UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

 

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

Commission file number: 000-23847

 

 

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

VIRGINIA   54-1873994

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

25020 Shore Parkway, Onley, Virginia 23418

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (757) 787-1335

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $0.275 par value   The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
  (NASDAQ Global Market)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes   ¨     No   x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes   ¨     No   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer   ¨     Accelerated filer   ¨     Non-accelerated filer   x     Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes   ¨     No   x

On June 30, 2007, the aggregate market value of the 2,108,615 shares of Common Stock of the registrant outstanding on such date, excluding shares held by affiliates of the registrant, was approximately $28.7 million. This figure is based on the closing price of $13.59 per share of the registrant’s Common Stock on June 30, 2007.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of March 5, 2008.

 

Class

 

Outstanding at March 5, 2008

Common Stock, $0.275 par value   2,504,479

 

 

 


This Form 10-K, including information incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K, contains certain forward-looking statements. For this purpose any statements contained in this Form 10-K that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate” or “continue” or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of factors.

PART I

Item 1.

BUSINESS

General

Shore Financial Corporation (the “Company”) is a Virginia corporation organized in September 1997 by Shore Bank (the “Bank”) for the purpose of becoming a unitary holding company of the Bank. The Company’s assets primarily consist of its investment in the Bank and approximately $5.0 million in cash and other investments. The business and management of the Company consists of the business and management of the Bank. The Bank is a Virginia chartered Federal Reserve member commercial bank that began business in 1961. The Company and the Bank are headquartered in Onley, Virginia.

The Bank operates out of a 19,000 square foot headquarters and operations facility and delivers its banking services through eight full-service banking centers and two investment offices located on the Eastern Shore of Virginia and Maryland, including the counties of Accomack and Northampton in Virginia and the Pocomoke City/Worcester County and Salisbury/Wicomico County market areas in Maryland. The Bank has a 22.6% market share of the banking deposits in the Accomack and Northampton Counties in Virginia and 3.1% of the market share in Wicomico County, Maryland, based on June 30, 2007 deposit information. The Pocomoke facility opened during September 2007 and, therefore, did not factor into the June 2007 deposit data. However, as of December 31, 2007, the Pocomoke facility had deposits totaling $4.0 million, which would represent 3.2% of the Pocomoke City deposit market as of June 30, 2007 on a pro forma basis. At December 31, 2007, the Company had consolidated assets of $266.7 million, Bank deposits of $196.6 million and stockholders’ equity of $27.7 million. Ninety-six dedicated employees staff the Company’s facilities.

The Bank offers a full menu of banking products and services in the communities it serves. For business customers, the Bank offers checking, cash management, remote deposit capture, credit card merchant services, internet banking and a variety of loan options, including operating lines of credit, equipment loans and real estate loans. The Bank is a leading real estate lender in its Virginia markets. For consumers, the Bank offers a totally free checking account, along with telephone and internet banking services, check cards, free use of the Bank’s twenty-two ATMs and a full compliment of retail banking products. The Bank has a mortgage banking division that offers a wide variety of residential loans that are originated on a pre-sold basis. The Bank does not securitize these loans.

The Company also offers other services that complement the core financial services offered by the Bank. The Bank’s subsidiary, Shore Investments, Inc. (“Shore Investments”), provides non-deposit investment products including stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and insurance products through its two locations and the Bank’s eight banking centers. An investment officer with over sixteen years of experience in the investment brokerage field manages Shore Investment’s Virginia office, while a Certified Financial Planner is the

 

2


investment officer in its Maryland office. Shore Investments has also invested in a Virginia title insurance agency, Bankers Title, LLC, that enables the Bank to offer title insurance policies to its real estate loan customers.

On January 8, 2008, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. (“HRB”). The Merger Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions of HRB’s acquisition of the Company through the merger of the Company with and into HRB (the “Merger”). Shore Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of HRB in the Merger and will operate separately from the Bank of Hampton Roads, a wholly-owned subsidiary of HRB.

Market Area

The Bank’s headquarters/operations center and five banking centers are located in Accomack and Northampton Counties, which together form the Eastern Shore of Virginia. These two counties run approximately seventy miles from the Maryland state line south and have thousands of miles of coastline on the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries on the west and the Atlantic Ocean on the east. They represent the southern portion of the Delmarva (Delaware-Maryland-Virginia) Peninsula.

The Eastern Shore of Virginia is 20 miles by bridge and tunnel from Hampton Roads, Virginia (Norfolk, Virginia Beach, Chesapeake, Portsmouth, Hampton, Suffolk), one of the largest population centers in the country. Tourism and agriculture, along with poultry and seafood processing are the predominant industries on the Eastern Shore.

Northamption County, Virginia has experienced significant development in recent years, especially on the southern end of the county. A planned-unit development named Bay Creek opened in spring 2001 that includes a 3,000-unit gated community and two golf courses designed by golf legends Arnold Palmer and Jack Nicklaus.

Accomack County, Virginia is the home of NASA’s Wallops Island Space Facility and the Regional Space Port Authority, as well as the tourist destinations of Chincoteague Island and the Assateague National Wildlife Refuge that draw over one million visitors annually. Until the recent slowdown in real estate activity, residential development was vibrant in Accomack County and is expected to continue in coming years. The space flight facility has recently had several successful rocket launches and plans exist for future launches and growth. Additionally, plans and funding initiatives have began for a Wallops Research Park that will house commercial operations that support the space flight facility as well as Basys, a company that retrofits large aircraft for private use and employs over one hundred people.

The Bank also has two banking centers in Salisbury, Maryland, the crossroads of the Delmarva Peninsula. Salisbury is the regional hub for industry, commerce, health care, recreation and the arts and is home to Perdue Farms, Peninsula Regional Medical Center, and Salisbury University, as well as a vibrant microwave and wireless communications industry. Along with a strong and diversified industrial base, wholesalers, retailers, and service firms serving ten counties in three states have made Wicomico County a regional supply center for the Eastern Shore of Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia.

During 2007, the Bank opened its eighth banking location in Pocomoke City, Maryland. Pocomoke is located in Worcester County, Maryland on the Maryland-Virginia border. It represents a new banking market for the Company that provides growth opportunities from the ever expanding Ocean City/Snow Hill markets and the bordering county of Somerset. Additionally, the branch serves the Bank’s customers located in northern Accomack County and allows the Bank to expand its customer base in this area. Since its opening in late September 2007, growth in the branch has exceeded expectations.

 

3


Competition

In its market area, the Bank competes with regional commercial banks and independent community banks with multiple offices on the Eastern Shore. These and certain other non-bank competitors have greater financial resources, diversified markets, and branch networks than the Bank and may be able to offer similar services at varying costs with higher lending limits. With nationwide banking, the Bank also faces the prospect of additional competitors entering its market area.

The Bank faces strong competition both in originating loans and in attracting deposits. Competition in originating loans comes primarily from commercial banks and mortgage lenders and to a lesser extent consumer finance companies, credit unions, and savings institutions. The Bank competes for loans principally on the basis of the quality of service it provides to borrowers, the interest rates and loan fees it charges and the types of loans it originates.

The Bank faces substantial competition in attracting deposits from other banks, money market and mutual funds, credit unions, insurance companies and brokerage houses. The ability of the Bank to attract and retain deposits depends on its ability to provide an investment opportunity that satisfies the requirements of investors as to rate of return, liquidity, risk, convenience and other factors. The Bank competes for these deposits by offering a variety of deposit accounts at competitive rates, having convenient business hours and by marketing the service it provides as the only locally-owned independent bank on the Eastern Shore of Virginia, one of four in Salisbury/Wicomico, Maryland and one of five in Pocomoke/Worcester, Maryland.

Credit Policies

The principal risk associated with each of the categories of loans in the Bank’s portfolio is the creditworthiness of its borrowers. Within each category, such risk is increased or decreased, depending on prevailing economic conditions. The Bank employs extensive written policies and procedures to mitigate credit risk. The loan portfolio is managed under a specifically defined credit process. This process includes formulation of portfolio management strategy, guidelines for underwriting standards and risk assessment, procedures for ongoing identification and management of credit deterioration, and regular portfolio reviews to estimate loss exposure and to ascertain compliance with the Bank’s policies.

In the normal course of business, the Bank makes various commitments and incurs certain contingent liabilities that are disclosed but not reflected in its annual financial statements, including commitments to extend credit. At December 31, 2007, commitments to extend credit totaled $50.3 million.

One-to-Four Family Residential Real Estate and Land Lending . The Bank’s primary lending program has been the origination of loans secured by one-to-four family residences and land, virtually all of which are located in its market area. At December 31, 2007, one-to-four family real estate and land loans aggregated $119.9 million or 54.1% of the Bank’s gross loans. The Bank evaluates both the borrower’s ability to make principal and interest payments and the value of the property that will secure the loan. Federal law permits the Bank to make loans in amounts of up to 100% of the appraised value of the underlying real estate. Generally, loans are made with a loan to value up to 90% for conventional mortgage loans on primary residences. The Bank generally originates mortgage loans that have an adjustable rate feature in which the rate changes every one, three or five years, but also offers some fifteen and thirty year fixed rate residential mortgages. Most adjustable rate loans are tied to comparable maturity U.S. Treasury Bills. Where loans are not indexed, they generally have a balloon feature. Additionally, the Bank offers conforming fixed rate mortgages through its mortgage banking division. There are unquantifiable risks resulting from potential increased costs to the borrower as a result of

 

4


repricing. Accordingly, it is possible that, during periods of rising interest rates, the risk of defaults on adjustable rate mortgages (“ARMs”) may increase due to the upward adjustment of interest costs to borrowers.

Construction Lending. The Bank makes local construction loans, primarily residential and small commercial loans. The construction loans are secured by the property for which the loan was obtained. At December 31, 2007, construction loans outstanding were $5.5 million or 2.5% of gross loans. The average life of a construction loan is less than twelve months and they either reprice daily based on the prime rate or are fixed during the construction period.

Commercial Real Estate Lending. The Bank also originates commercial real estate loans. Various types of commercial real estate secure these loans, including multifamily residential buildings, commercial buildings and offices, and raw land used for development. At December 31, 2007, commercial real estate loans aggregated $69.4 million or 31.3% of the Bank’s gross loans. The interest rates on commercial real estate loans are usually fixed for 1 to 5 years, generally amortize over 5 to 25 years and may have a call provision. The Bank’s commercial real estate loans are secured by properties in its market area.

In its underwriting of commercial real estate, the Bank may lend, under federal regulation, up to 100% of the security property’s appraised value, although the Bank’s loan to appraised value ratio on such properties is 80% or less in most cases. Commercial real estate lending entails significant additional risk, compared with residential mortgage lending. Commercial real estate loans may involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Additionally, the payment experience on loans secured by income producing properties is typically dependent on the successful operation of a business or a real estate project and thus may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or in the economy generally. The Bank’s commercial real estate loan underwriting criteria require an examination of debt service coverage ratios, the borrower’s creditworthiness and prior credit history and reputation, and the personal guarantees or endorsements of borrowers.

Commercial Loans. At December 31, 2007, commercial loans aggregated $9.2 million or 4.2% of the Bank’s gross loans. Commercial business loans generally have a higher degree of risk than residential mortgage loans, but have commensurably higher yields. To manage these risks, the Bank generally secures appropriate collateral and carefully monitors the financial condition of its large commercial exposures. Commercial business loans typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow generated by its business and are often secured by business assets, such as accounts receivable, equipment and inventory. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the business itself. Further, the collateral for commercial business loans may depreciate over time and cannot be appraised with as much precision as residential real estate. The Bank has a credit review and monitoring system to regularly review the cash flow and collateral of commercial borrowers.

Consumer Lending. The Bank offers various secured and unsecured consumer loans, including unsecured personal loans and lines of credit, home equity lines of credit, automobile loans, deposit account loans and installment and demand loans. At December 31, 2007, the Bank had consumer loans of $17.7 million or 8.0% of gross loans. Such loans are generally made to customers with whom the Bank has a preexisting relationship and are generally in amounts of under $200,000. The Bank originates virtually all of its consumer loans in its market area

Consumer loans may entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured, such as lines of credit, or secured by rapidly depreciable assets such as automobiles. In such cases, any repossessed

 

5


collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation. The remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.

Employees

At December 31, 2007, the Company had 87 full-time and 9 part-time employees. The Company considers relations with its employees to be good.

Regulation and Supervision

Set forth below is a brief description of certain laws and regulations that relate to the regulation of the Company and the Bank. The descriptions of these laws and regulations, as well as descriptions of laws and regulations contained elsewhere herein, do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to applicable laws and regulations.

The Company

General . The Company, as a bank holding company, is subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the “BHCA”) and the regulation, supervision and examination requirements of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). Bank holding companies are subject to extensive regulation by the Federal Reserve as set forth in Regulation Y, 12 C.F.R. Part 225. Regulation Y establishes the registration, reporting, examination, applications, acquisitions, control and divestiture, change in bank control, appraisals, and change in director and senior executive officers requirements applicable to bank holding companies. Regulation Y and the interpretations and rulings issued by the Federal Reserve thereunder identify various prohibited non-banking activities in which bank holding companies and their subsidiaries may not engage as well as various exempt activities in which a bank holding company and its subsidiaries may engage either with or, in some cases, without prior Federal Reserve approval. Regulation Y further confirms the authority of the Federal Reserve under the BHCA to impose criminal and civil penalties for violations of the BHCA and the regulations and orders issued thereunder and to issue cease and desist orders when necessary in connection therewith.

Activities Obligations and Restrictions. There are a number of obligations and restrictions imposed on bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries that are designed to reduce potential loss exposure to the depositors of the depository institutions and to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance funds. For example, under a policy of the Federal Reserve with respect to bank holding company operations, a bank holding company is required to serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary depository institutions and to commit resources to support such institutions in circumstances where it might not do so absent such policy.

Banking laws also provide that amounts received from the liquidation or other resolution of any insured depository institution by any receiver must be distributed (after payment of secured claims) to pay the deposit liabilities of the institution prior to payment of any other general or unsecured senior liability, subordinated liability, general creditor or stockholder. This provision would give depositors a preference over general and subordinated creditors and stockholders in the event a receiver is appointed to distribute the asset of any bank or savings bank subsidiaries.

 

6


Exchange Act. The Company is subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including the filing of annual, quarterly and other reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). As an Exchange Act reporting company, the Company is directly affected by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations enacted pursuant thereto (the “SOX Act”), the corporate responsibility and accounting reform legislation signed into law on July 30, 2002.

The Bank

General. As a state chartered commercial bank, the Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and examination requirements of the Bureau of Financial Institutions of the Virginia State Corporation Commission (“SCC”). The Bank is also subject to the regulation, supervision and examination requirements of the Federal Reserve and the FDIC. State and federal laws also govern the activities in which the Bank may engage, the investments it may make and the aggregate amount of loans that may be granted to one borrower. Various consumer and compliance laws and regulations also affect the Bank’s operations. The Federal Reserve and the SCC conduct periodic examinations to test the Bank’s compliance with various regulatory requirements. The SCC completed its most recent examination in March 2007, while the Federal Reserve completed a compliance examination of the Bank during November 2002 and a safety and soundness examination during April 2005. Federal and state laws preclude the Bank from disclosing the results of these examinations.

Insurance of Accounts. The FDIC insures the deposits of the Bank up to the limits set forth under applicable law. On February 15, 2006, federal legislation to reform federal deposit insurance was enacted. The new law merged the old Bank Insurance Fund and Savings Association Insurance Fund into the single Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”). On November 2, 2006, the FDIC adopted final regulations establishing a risk-based assessment system that is intended to more closely tie each bank’s deposit insurance assessments to the risk it poses to the DIF. Under the new risk-based assessment system, which became effective in the beginning of 2007, the FDIC evaluates each bank’s risk based on three primary factors: (1) its supervisory rating, (2) its financial ratios, and (3) its long-term debt issuer rating, if the bank has one. The new rates for most banks will vary between five and seven cents for every $100 of domestic deposits.

Applied to the Bank’s assessment base of approximately $202.9 million, this translates to an annual deposit premium estimated to be between $101,500 and $142,000. Most banks, including Shore Bank, have not been required to pay any deposit insurance premiums since 1995. As part of the reform, Congress provided credits to institutions that paid high premiums in the past to bolster the FDIC’s insurance reserves. As a result, according to the FDIC, the majority of banks had assessment credits to initially offset all of their premiums in 2007. The assessment credit for the Bank was calculated at $126,900. The assessment credit was not recognized up front, but has been recognized as a reduction in deposit premiums that would otherwise have been due. At December 31, 2007, the Company had $48,000 of this credit remaining to offset future deposit insurance premiums. The Company anticipates this credit to continue offsetting premiums through the second quarter of 2008, after which it will begin incurring quarterly premiums of approximately $25,000 based on the Bank’s December 2007 assessment base. The level of annual deposit premiums is dependent on the amount of the Bank’s deposit assessment base.

Check 21. On October 28, 2003, President Bush signed into law the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, also known as Check 21. Check 21 gives “substitute checks,” such as a digital image of a check and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check. Some of the major provisions of Check 21 include:

 

7


   

allowing check truncation without making it mandatory;

 

   

demanding that every financial institution communicate to accountholders in writing a description of its substitute check processing program and their rights under the law;

 

   

legalizing substitutions for and replacements of paper checks without agreement from consumers;

 

   

retaining in place the previously mandated electronic collection and return of checks between financial institutions only when individual agreements are in place;

 

   

requiring that when accountholders request verification, financial institutions produce the original check (or a copy that accurately represents the original) and demonstrate that the account debit was accurate and valid; and

 

   

requiring recrediting of funds to an individual’s account on the next business day after a consumer proves that the financial institution has erred.

This legislation will likely affect bank capital spending as many financial institutions assess whether technological or operational changes are necessary to stay competitive and take advantage of the new opportunities presented by Check 21.

Regulatory Capital Requirements . The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Generally, the Company and the Bank are required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8%. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2007, that the Company meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject. In fact, at December 31, 2007, the Bank exceeded all of its regulatory capital requirements, with total capital to risk-weighted assets, tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and tier 1 capital to average assets ratios of 13.57%, 12.31% and 8.77%, respectively.

Capital Distributions . The Bank is subject to legal limitations on capital distributions including the payment of dividends, if, after making such distribution, the institution would become “undercapitalized” (as such term is used in the statute). For all state member banks of the Federal Reserve seeking to pay dividends, the prior approval of the applicable Federal Reserve Bank is required if the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year will exceed the sum of the bank’s net profits for that year and its retained net profits for the preceding two calendar years. Federal law also generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distribution (including payment of a dividend or payment of a management fee to its holding company) if the depository institution would thereafter fail to maintain capital above regulatory minimums. Federal Reserve member banks are also authorized to limit the payment of dividends by any state member bank if such payment may be deemed to constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. In addition, under Virginia law, no dividend may be declared or paid that would impair a Virginia chartered bank’s paid-in capital. The SCC has general authority to prohibit payment of dividends by a Virginia chartered bank if it determines that the limitation is in the public interest and is necessary to ensure the bank’s financial soundness.

 

8


Financial Modernization Legislation. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (“GLBA”) was signed into law on November 12, 1999. The main purpose of GLBA is to permit greater affiliations within the financial services industry, primarily banking, securities and insurance. The provisions of GLBA that are believed to be of most significance to the Company are discussed below.

GLBA repeals sections 20 and 32 of the Glass-Steagall Act, which separated commercial banking from investment banking, and substantially amends the BHCA, which limited the ability of bank holding companies to engage in the securities and insurance businesses. To achieve this purpose, GLBA provides for a new type of company, the “financial holding company.” A financial holding company may engage in or acquire companies that engage in a broad range of financial services, including

 

   

Securities activities such as underwriting, dealing, brokerage, investment and merchant banking; and

 

   

Insurance underwriting, sales and brokerage activities.

A bank holding company may elect to become a financial holding company only if all of its depository institution subsidiaries are well-capitalized, well-managed and have at least a satisfactory Community Reinvestment Act rating. While the Company meets the requirements to become a financial holding company, it has not elected to be treated as a financial holding company under GLBA at this time.

GLBA, and certain regulations issued by federal banking agencies, also provide protections against the transfer and use by financial institutions of consumers’ nonpublic personal information. A financial institution must provide to its customers, at the beginning of the customer relationship and annually thereafter, the institution’s policies and procedures regarding the handling of customers’ nonpublic personal financial information. The privacy provisions generally prohibit a financial institution from providing a customer’s personal financial information to unaffiliated third parties unless the institution discloses to the customer that the information may be so provided and the customer is given the opportunity to opt out of such disclosure.

USA Patriot Act of 2001.   In October 2001, the USA Patriot Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”) was enacted in response to the terrorist attacks in New York, Pennsylvania and Washington, D.C. which occurred on September 11, 2001. The Patriot Act is intended to strengthen U.S. law enforcements and the intelligence communities’ abilities to work cohesively to combat terrorism on a variety of fronts. The potential impact of the Patriot Act on financial institutions of all kinds is significant and wide ranging. The Patriot Act contains sweeping anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and imposes various regulations, including standards for verifying client identification at account opening, and rules to promote cooperation among financial institutions, regulators and law enforcement entities in identifying parties that may be involved in terrorism or money laundering.

Reporting Terrorist Activities.   The Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) has sent, and will send, banking regulatory agencies lists of the names of persons suspected of involvement in terrorist attacks. The Bank has been requested, and will be requested, to search its records for any relationships or transactions with persons on those lists. If the Bank finds any relationships or transactions, it must file a suspicious activity report and contact the FBI.

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), which is a division of the Department of Treasury, is responsible for helping to ensure that United States entities do not engage in transactions with “enemies” of the United States, as definied by various Executive

 

9


Orders and Acts of Congress. OFAC has sent, and will send, banking regulatory agencies lists of names of persons and organizations suspected of aiding, harboring or engaging in terrorist acts. If the Bank finds a name on any transaction, account or wire transfer that is on an OFAC list, it must freeze such account, file a suspicious activity report and notify the FBI. The Bank has appointed a security officer to oversee the inspection of its accounts and the filing of any notifications. The Bank actively checks high-risk OFAC areas such as new accounts, wire transfers and customer files. The Bank performs these checks utilizing software, which is updated each time a modification is made to the lists provided by OFAC and other agencies of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons.

Other Regulations.   Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by the Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. The Bank’s loan operations will also be subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as:

 

   

the federal Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;

 

   

the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;

 

   

the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in extending credit;

 

   

the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1978, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies;

 

   

the Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies; and

 

   

the rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws.

In addition, the deposit operations of the Bank will be subject to:

 

   

the Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records; and

 

   

the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E issued by the Federal Reserve Board to implement that Act, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and clients’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services.

 

10


Item 1A.

RISK FACTORS

General economic conditions, either national or in the markets where the Company operates, may become unfavorable.

The Company is affected by general economic conditions in the United States and, in particular, the markets in which it operates. An economic downturn within the Company’s markets or the nation as a whole could negatively impact household and corporate incomes. This impact may lead to decreased demand for both loan and deposit products and increase the number of customers who fail to pay interest or principal on their loans.

Due to the limited number of markets in which the Company operates, it is less able than a larger institution to spread the risks of unfavorable local economic conditions across a large number of diversified economies. Moreover, we cannot give any assurance that we will benefit from any market growth or favorable economic conditions in our primary market areas if they do occur.

If the Company does not adjust to rapid changes in the financial services industry, its financial performance may suffer.

The Company’s ability to deliver strong financial performance and returns on investment to shareholders will depend in part on its ability to expand the scope of available financial services offerings to meet the needs and demands of its customers. In addition to the challenge of competing against other banks in attracting and retaining customers for traditional banking services, the Company’s competitors also include securities dealers, brokers, mortgage bankers, investment advisors, specialty finance and insurance companies who seek to offer one-stop financial services that may include services that banks have not been able or allowed to offer to their customers in the past. The increasingly competitive environment is primarily a result of changes in regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers.

Legislative or regulatory changes or actions, or significant litigation, could adversely impact the Company or the businesses in which the Company is engaged.

The Company is subject to extensive state and federal regulation, supervision and legislation that govern almost all aspects of its operations. Laws and regulations may change from time to time and are primarily intended for the protection of consumers, depositors and the deposit insurance funds. The impact of any changes to laws and regulations or other actions by regulatory agencies may negatively impact the Company or its ability to increase the value of its business. Additionally, actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against the Company could cause it to devote significant time and resources to defending itself and may lead to penalties that materially affect the Company and its shareholders. Future changes in the laws or regulations or their interpretations or enforcement could be materially adverse to the Company and its shareholders.

The Company is exposed to operational risk.

Similar to any corporation, the Company is exposed to many types of operational risk, including reputational risk, legal and compliance risk, the risk of fraud or theft by employees or outsiders, unauthorized transactions by employees or operational errors, including clerical or record-keeping errors or those resulting from faulty or disabled computer or telecommunications systems.

 

11


Negative public opinion can result from the Company’s actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending practices, corporate governance and acquisitions and from actions taken by government regulators and community organizations in response to those activities. Negative public opinion can adversely affect the Company’s ability to attract and keep customers and can expose it to litigation and regulatory action.

Given the volume of transactions at the Company, certain errors may be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and successfully rectified. The Company’s necessary dependence upon automated systems to record and process its transaction volume may further increase the risk that technical system flaws or employee tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses that are difficult to detect. The Company may also be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond its control (for example, computer viruses or electrical or telecommunications outages), which may give rise to disruption of service to customers and to financial loss or liability. The Company is further exposed to the risk that its external vendors may be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations (or will be subject to the same risk of fraud or operational errors by their respective employees as is the Company) and to the risk that the Company’s (or its vendors’) business continuity and data security systems prove to be inadequate.

Changes in interest rates could affect the Company’s income and cash flows.

The Company’s income and cash flows depend to a great extent on the difference between the interest rates earned on interest-earning assets such as loans and investment securities, and the interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond the Company’s control, including general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies (in particular, the Federal Reserve). Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, will influence the origination of loans, the prepayment speed of loans, the purchase of investments, the generation of deposits and the rates received on loans and investment securities and paid on deposits or other sources of funding. The impact of these changes may be magnified if the Company does not effectively manage the relative sensitivity of its assets and liabilities to changes in market interest rates. Fluctuations in these areas may adversely affect the Company and its shareholders.

Changes in accounting standards could impact reported earnings.

The accounting standard setters, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board, SEC and other regulatory bodies, periodically change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how it records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of prior period financial statements.

The preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires the use of estimates that may vary from actual results.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make significant estimates that affect the financial statements. Two of the Company’s most critical estimates are the level of the allowance for credit losses and the valuation of certain assets, including available-for-sale investment securities and real estate owned. Due to the inherent nature of these estimates, the Company cannot provide absolute assurance that it will not significantly increase the allowance for credit losses and/or sustain credit losses that are significantly higher than the provided allowance, nor that it will not recognize a significant loss or impairment of its investment securities and real estate owned assets. For more information on the sensitivity of these estimates, refer to the Critical Accounting Policies and Judgments section of Part II.

 

12


The Company’s stock price may fluctuate.

The Company’s stock price is publicly traded and, therefore, several factors exist that could cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These factors include:

 

   

actual or anticipated variations in earnings;

 

   

changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections regarding bank stocks;

 

   

the Company’s announcements of developments related to its businesses;

 

   

operating and stock performance of other companies deemed to be peers;

 

   

new technology used or services offered by traditional and non-traditional competitors;

 

   

news reports of trends, concerns and other issues related to the financial services industry; and

 

   

the low transaction volume of the Company’s stock.

The Company’s stock price may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to the Company’s performance. General market price declines or market volatility in the future could adversely affect the price of its common stock, and the current market price may not be indicative of future market prices.

Even though the Company’s common stock is currently traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market’s Global Market, it has less liquidity than the average stock quoted on a national securities exchange.

The trading volume in the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market has been relatively low when compared with larger companies listed on the NASDAQ Global Market or the stock exchanges. Because of this, it may be more difficult for shareholders to sell a substantial number of shares for the same price at which shareholders could sell a smaller number of shares. Additionally, volatility of the stock price may occur on relatively small trading volumes of the Company’s stock.

The Company cannot predict the effect, if any, that future sales of its common stock in the market, or the availability of shares of common stock for sale in the market, will have on the market price of the common stock. The Company can give no assurance that sales of substantial amounts of common stock in the market, or the potential for large amounts of sales in the market, would not cause the price of its common stock to decline or impair The Company’s future ability to raise capital through sales of its common stock.

 

13


Item 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

There are no unresolved staff comments currently outstanding.

Item 2.

PROPERTIES

The Company’s headquarters is located at 25020 Shore Parkway, Onley, Virginia, a two story colonial brick building built in 2004 that houses the Company’s corporate offices and operations center. The Bank operates eight branch banking offices (5 in Virginia, 2 in Salisbury, Maryland and 1 in Pocomoke City, Maryland), owning five of them free of any encumbrances, owning the building of one branch site free of any encumbrances, but is leases the land under an agreement expiring in 2009, with two remaining five-year renewals and leases the other two branch locations on a temporary basis. The Bank leases the temporary locations (one being a formed owned property sold during 2007) under two year leases to house two of its branches while the new locations are being constructed. Shore Investments leases office space under an agreement expiring in 2010, with two optional five-year renewal periods.

Item 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of its operations, the Company is a party to various legal proceedings. Based upon information currently available, management believes that such legal proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, or results of operations of the Company.

Item 4.

SUBMISSIONS OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007.

 

14


PART II

Item 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER

MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

The Company’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “SHBK.” The following table sets forth the per share high and low closing prices along with dividends that were paid quarterly on the common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market for the periods indicated:

 

       High    Low    Cash
Dividends
Paid

2006

        

First Quarter

   $ 15.13    $ 13.96    $ 0.058

Second Quarter

   $ 14.67    $ 13.75    $ 0.058

Third Quarter

   $ 17.56    $ 13.75    $ 0.058

Fourth Quarter

   $ 15.90    $ 14.50    $ 0.070

2007

        

First Quarter

   $ 14.75    $ 13.36    $ 0.070

Second Quarter

   $ 14.45    $ 13.00    $ 0.070

Third Quarter

   $ 13.83    $ 12.50    $ 0.070

Fourth Quarter

   $ 13.30    $ 11.33    $ 0.080

At February 22, 2008, there were 2,502,967 shares of common stock outstanding held by 878 stockholders of record.

 

15


Performance Graph

The following graph compares, for the five years ended December 31, 2007, the yearly cumulative total shareholder return on the Company’s common stock with (1) the yearly cumulative total shareholder return on stocks included in the Nasdaq composite stock index and (2) the yearly cumulative total shareholder return on stocks included in the SNL stock index for banks of with less than $500 million in total assets.

There can be no assurance that the Company’s stock performance in the future will continue with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below.

LOGO

 

       Period Ending

Index

   12/31/02    12/31/03    12/31/04    12/31/05    12/31/06    12/31/07

Shore Financial Corporation

   100.00    170.89    207.25    180.51    190.60    159.53

NASDAQ Composite

   100.00    150.01    162.89    165.13    180.85    198.60

SNL Bank < $500M Index

   100.00    145.97    168.49    178.39    187.41    152.17

Dividend Policy

On January 8, 2008, the Company declared a $0.08 per share quarterly cash dividend paid on February 1, 2008 to shareholders of record on January 25, 2008. The Company hopes to continue with a quarterly cash dividend on its common stock in the future. Any future determination as to payment of cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend on the Company’s earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Bank paid $700,000 and $1.0 million, respectively, in dividends to the Company.

 

16


Item 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

       Years Ended December 31,  
       2007     2006     2005     2004     2003  
     (In thousands, except per share data)  
Income Statement Data:           

Interest income

   $ 16,257     $ 15,113     $ 12,851     $ 10,697     $ 9,501  

Interest expense

     7,452       6,618       4,414       3,275       3,275  

Net interest income

     8,805       8,495       8,437       7,422       6,226  

Provision (recovery) for loan losses

     (73 )     59       304       419       380  

Noninterest income

     3,400       3,392       2,379       1,920       1,889  

Noninterest expense

     8,440       7,739       6,644       5,559       4,780  

Income taxes

     1,107       1,156       1,193       1,011       893  
                                        

Net income

   $ 2,731     $ 2,933     $ 2,675     $ 2,353     $ 2,062  
                                        
Per Share Data:           

Net income - basic (1)

   $ 1.09     $ 1.18     $ 1.08     $ 0.95     $ 0.84  

Net income - dilutive (1)

     1.08       1.16       1.06       0.93       0.83  

Cash dividends (1)

     0.29       0.25       0.22       0.18       0.14  

Book value at period end

     11.08       10.46       11.39       10.64       9.80  

Tangible book value at period end

     10.95       10.30       11.17       10.39       9.51  

Average shares outstanding (000’s) (1)

     2,500       2,492       2,485       2,474       2,444  
Balance Sheet Data (period end):           

Assets

   $ 266,667     $ 260,676     $ 247,419     $ 237,689     $ 196,550  

Loans, net of unearned income and allowance

     218,887       207,725       192,697       175,995       140,207  

Securities

     22,894       30,408       32,351       38,972       40,611  

Deposits

     196,564       198,103       188,970       192,737       158,891  

Stockholders’ equity

     27,721       26,126       23,629       21,959       20,201  
Performance Ratios:           

Return on average assets

     1.04 %     1.14 %     1.10 %     1.08 %     1.11 %

Return on average equity

     10.05 %     11.76 %     11.74 %     11.01 %     10.64 %

Net interest margin

     3.63 %     3.57 %     3.75 %     3.72 %     3.63 %

Efficiency (2)

     68.05 %     63.99 %     63.54 %     59.47 %     59.70 %
Asset Quality Ratios:           

Allowance for loan losses to period end loans

     1.22 %     1.36 %     1.49 %     1.35 %     1.41 %

Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans

     340.35 %     308.59 %     267.95 %     253.05 %     362.68 %

Nonperforming assets to period end loans and foreclosed properties

     0.36 %     0.44 %     0.56 %     0.53 %     0.39 %

Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans

     0.05 %     0.02 %     -0.08 %     0.01 %     -0.01 %
Capital and Liquidity Ratios:           

Leverage (3)

     10.40 %     10.02 %     9.55 %     9.24 %     10.28 %

Risk-based:

          

Tier 1 capital

     14.36 %     13.77 %     13.21 %     12.74 %     14.37 %

Total capital

     15.60 %     15.09 %     14.53 %     14.14 %     15.74 %

Average loans to average deposits

     106.48 %     104.48 %     96.93 %     87.60 %     79.78 %

 

(1) Earnings per share, dividends per share and average share data adjusted to reflect the six-for-five stock split effected by the Company during August 2006.
(2) Computed by dividing noninterest expense, net of nonrecurring expenses, by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income, net of security gains and losses.
(3) Computed as a percentage of stockholders’ equity to period end assets.

 

17


Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

The year 2007 represented a challenging period for the financial services world. The economy slowed as the real estate boom enjoyed over the past several years came to a halt and the cost of oil and consumer goods rose. Many large homebuilders and mortgage companies faced significant financial challenges due to the lack of housing demand and resulting mortgage demand. The true repercussions of the subprime loan business, a business not participated in by the Company, occurring in recent years reared its ugly head, also playing a large part in the mortgage company failures. The large financial institutions and investment firms holding the mortgage-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations and other offshoot products of the mortgage industry ended taking asset devaluations in the billions of dollars as the demand for these securities, that once appeared endless, became virtually nonexistent. Additionally, it became apparent that many of the subprime loans could not be repaid by the borrowers.

As a result of the subprime fallout, financial markets became nervous with access to low cost funding proving difficult as the capital markets became volatile and suspect of the industry as a whole. If this financial debacle wasn’t enough, rising energy costs began significantly affecting the cost of common goods and services, resulting in a decline in the average consumer’s disposal income. As this ordeal played out, it became rather apparent that many individuals had been living off of the rising equity in their homes in recent years as a result of the real estate boom and had become engrossed in debt that many couldn’t afford to service. Although the majority smaller financial institutions such as the Company do not engage in many of the business activities impacting the larger institutions during 2007, the disruptions in the capital markets and the economy as a whole impacted the Company’s financial performance during 2007.

The Company entered 2007 knowing even before the subprime meltdown came to light the year would be challenging. The real estate industry continued its decline that began during 2006 and, with the yield curve being relatively flat and funding costs continuing to rise, the Company’s net interest margin entered the year under significant pressure. In spite of these challenges, the Company was able to accomplish many strategic initiatives during the year and improve its net interest margin substantially.

During 2007, the Bank added its eighth branch in Pocomoke City, Maryland with growth already exceeding expectations; established three new advisory boards; began construction on a branch rebuild in Salisbury, Maryland and a branch relocation in Cape Charles, Virginia; added significant strength to its management team with the hiring of four experienced bank executives; introduced remote deposit capture to its commercial customers with twenty-four outlets operating after only seven months of offering the product; initiated a significant Online Banking upgrade which has resulted in a 40% increase in usage; rebranded the Bank’s image through the use of an outside marketing firm; implemented several successful deposit products and promotions; and culminated the year with the negotiation and subsequent announcement of the Company’s proposed merger with Hampton Roads Bankshares.

As for 2007 operating results, the Company producing earnings of $2.73 million during the year, compared to $2.93 million in 2006. These results represented shareholder return of $1.08 per diluted share compared to $1.16 in 2006. Although many of the aforementioned strategic initiatives impacted earnings, the Company benefited immediately from many of them during 2007 and should continue to do so going forward. The Company also benefited from other factors during the year, including an increase in its net interest margin from a low of 3.31% during January 2007 and 3.57% during 2006 to 3.63% for the 2007 year. As expected, interest rates in the Bank’s adjustable rate mortgage loan portfolio began adjusting up as a result of the Federal Reserve’s aggressive

 

18


monetary policy of interest rate tightening during the first half of 2006. Additionally, the Bank’s mortgage banking operation experienced a 69.8% increase in fees generated during the year as compared to 2006.

The Company’s total assets grew to $266.7 million at December 31, 2007, compared to $260.7 million at December 31, 2006, primarily resulting from a 5.2% increase in loans. Total gross loans ended 2007 at $221.6 million, compared to $210.6 million at December 31, 2006. Total deposits ended the year at $196.6 million, compared to $198.1 million at December 31, 2006. Continued growth in the Bank’s real estate loan portfolio, specifically those secured by one-to-four family residences, represented the largest portion of the increase. Deposits were impacted by the continued challenges and aggressive market competition surrounding retail funding and the maturity of $5.0 million in brokered certificates of deposit that were obtained during 2006. The Company’s shareholders’ equity was $27.7 million at December 31, 2007, compared to $26.1 million at the prior year end.

The Bank’s loan portfolio quality remained strong during 2007. The Bank experienced net loan charge-offs of $101,000 during 2007, which is 0.05% of average loans during the period, while the level of nonperforming assets to period end loans was 0.36% at December 31, 2007. The Bank had no other real estate owned (“OREO”) or other foreclosed assets at December 31, 2007 and maintained an allowance for loan losses to period end loans of 1.22%.

Results of Operation

General

Net interest income is the major component of the Company’s earnings and is equal to the amount by which interest income exceeds interest expense. Interest income is derived from interest-earning assets composed primarily of loans and securities. Interest expense results from interest-bearing liabilities, primarily consisting of deposits and short-term borrowings. Changes in the volume and mix of these assets and liabilities, as well as changes in the yields earned and rates paid, determine changes in net interest income. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing net interest income by average earning assets and represents the Company’s net yield on its earning assets.

Interest Income

2007 Compared to 2006

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company earned $16.3 million in interest income, representing a 7.6% increase over the $15.1 million earned for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company’s net interest income benefited from the improvement in its net interest margin and loan growth.

Contributing to the improved net interest margin was a 34 basis point increase in yields on earning assets from 6.33% during 2006 to 6.67% for the 2007 year. Loan yields made up the majority of this increase by improving from 6.57% during 2006 to 6.92% during 2007. Investment yield improved 14 basis points to 5.01% during the year.

Average loans outstanding increased $8.0 million to $214.3 million from $206.3 million during 2006. The Bank’s real estate mortgage loan portfolio experienced the most growth with an increase of 5.8% in average balances outstanding, while average commercial loans increased 3.8% and average consumer loans (including home equity lines) declined 7.9%. Real estate mortgage loan balances, which include construction loans, averaged $121.1 million during 2007, while commercial and consumer loans averaged $76.3 million and $16.8 million, respectively. The Bank realized gross loan production of $66.4 million during 2007 compared to $82.0 million during 2006, which illustrates the impact of a declining real estate market and the economy in general.

 

19


Average securities declined by $3.1 million to $28.4 million during 2007 compared to $31.5 million during 2006 as the Company continued using maturing securities to fund liquidity needs while the retail deposit market remained competitive. Also, profitable investment opportunities continued to be scarce during most of the year.

2006 Compared to 2005

During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company earned $15.1 million in interest income, representing a 17.6% increase over the $12.9 million earned for the year ended December 31, 2005. The Company’s net interest income benefited from growth in its loan portfolio and improved yields on earning assets, but was negatively impacted by increasing cost of funding.

Spearheaded by 10.7% growth in average loans outstanding resulting from $82.0 million on total loan production, average earning assets were $240.2 million during 2006, representing a $13.1 million increase over 2005. Average total loans increased $19.9 million to $206.3 million during 2006 from $186.4 million during 2005. The Bank’s real estate mortgage loan portfolio experienced the most growth with an increase of 17.0% in average balances outstanding, while average commercial loans increased 4.2% and average consumer loans (including home equity lines) were flat. Real estate mortgage loan balances, which include construction loans, averaged $114.5 during 2006, while commercial and consumer loans averaged $73.5 million and $18.2 million, respectively. The Bank realized strong loan production during the first half of 2006 while production levels slowed to a more moderate pace during the second half of the year. Average securities declined by $6.6 million to $31.5 million during 2006 compared to $38.1 million during 2005. The Company used maturing securities to fund liquidity needs during 2006 due to limited opportunities in the investment market and the rising cost of funds, mostly due to a flat yield curve.

Yields on earning assets continued to benefit from the Company’s asset sensitive financial position. Total yields improved to 6.33% during 2006 compared to 5.69% in 2005. Loans yielded 6.57% during the year, compared to 6.03% during 2005, resulting primarily from the repricing of adjustable rate loans and loan growth. The maturity of lower yielding investment securities helped improve the yield on securities to 4.87% during 2006, compared to 4.21% for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Interest Expense

2007 Compared to 2006

The Company’s interest expense increased $900,000 to $7.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $6.6 million during 2006, slowing significantly from prior year’s growth levels and contributing to the margin improvement. As mentioned, retail deposit growth remained challenging with total average deposits, including noninterest-bearing demand deposits, increasing only 1.9% to $201.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2007 from $197.4 million during 2006. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased 1.4% to $207.0 million during 2007, as compared to $204.1 million during 2006, while the cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 36 basis points from 3.24% during 2006 to 3.60% during 2007. The Company’s cost of funds (including demand deposits) was 3.17% during 2007, compared to 2.86% for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Interest rates rose quickly during the Federal Reserve’s aggressive tightening campaign between 2005 and 2006, resulting in a significant impact on the Company’s relatively short duration funding portfolio. As the rate increases ceased and ultimately resulted in the Federal Reserve lowing interest rates during late 2007, the Company’s funding costs became more manageable. Notwithstanding the current decline occurring primarily in short-term interest rates, the inability to attract significant low cost deposits continues to put pressure on funding costs. The Company does not expect a change in this trend for the immediate future.

 

20


The existing competition for retail deposits becomes very apparent when analyzing checking and savings account balances. Average account balances in this category were $65.5 million during 2007 and the cost of these funds for the year was 1.46%, representing a 2.3% decline in averages balances and a 50 basis point increase in cost over the prior year. To compensate for this decline and generate adequate liquidity to fund loan demand, the Bank continued to aggressively price its time deposits. Accordingly, average time deposit balances increased to $107.6 million and the cost of these funds increased by 30 basis points to 4.48% for the year. Average Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings and their related costs were flat during the year at $33.8 million and 4.94%, respectively, although the Bank began relying on them more late in the year as brokered deposits matured with new brokered deposit funding costs being noncompetitive and normal seasonal deposit declines occurred.

2006 Compared to 2005

As the yield curve became more inverted during 2006, the Company faced the challenge of obtaining cost-effective funding to support its loan growth and other liquidity needs. During the recent period of rising rates, customers became more interest rate sensitive and began moving funds out of lower yielding accounts into higher yielding accounts. Also, the uncertainty surrounding the direction of interest rates caused customers to demand shorter term time deposits as opposed those with longer terms. As the retail deposit market became more competitive, the Company looked to the wholesale funding markets for alternative liquidity needs. Although at different points in 2006 the wholesale markets provided less expensive funding than the retail market, the funds were still costly and, accordingly, negatively impacted the Company’s interest expense.

The Company’s interest expense increased $2.2 million to $6.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to $4.4 million during 2005. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased 5.6% to $204.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to $193.4 million during 2005, while the cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 96 basis points from 2.28% during 2005 to 3.24% during 2006. Total average deposits, including noninterest-bearing demand deposits, increased 2.7% to $197.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2006 from $192.3 million during 2005. The Company’s cost of funds (including demand deposits) was 2.86% during 2006, compared to 2.00% for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Average checking and savings account balances were $67.1 million during 2006 and the cost of these funds for the year was 96 basis points, representing a 18 basis point increase over the prior year. Average time deposit balances were $103.4 million and the cost of these funds increased by 93 basis points to 4.18% for the year. As part of the increased reliance on wholesale funding during 2006, the Bank purchased $7.0 million of brokered deposits and average Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings increased by $5.1 million to $33.7 million during the year. Of the total FHLB borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2006, $12.5 million represent amounts with fixed terms up to seven years while the remaining balance floats based on an overnight rate. The cost of these funds increased 133 basis points to 4.92% during 2006.

 

21


Net Interest Income

2007 Compared to 2006

As a result of the factors discussed above, the Company’s net interest income increased 3.6% to $8.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $8.5 million in 2006. Although the Company realized improvement in its net interest margin during 2007, the ever-changing interest rate environment and competition continues to make additional margin improvement challenging.

2006 Compared to 2005

As previously discussed, the Company’s net interest margin was negatively impacted by the flat yield curve, resulting in a decline of 18 basis points to 3.57%. The shape of the yield curve diluted the positive impact of being asset sensitive during 2006, primarily due to the fact that funding rates, which are primarily short-term, were increasing faster than rates on interest earning assets. As a result, the Company’s net interest income was relatively flat at $8.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to $8.4 million in 2005.

 

22


The following tables illustrate average balances of total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated, showing the average distribution of assets, liabilities, stockholders’ equity and the related income, expense, and corresponding weighted average yields and costs. The average balances used in these tables and other statistical data were calculated using daily average balances.

Average Balances, Income and Expenses, Yields and Rates

 

       Years Ended December 31,  
       2007     2006     2005  
(Dollars In Thousands)    Average
Balance
    Income/
Expense
   Yield/
Rate
    Average
Balance
    Income/
Expense
   Yield/
Rate
    Average
Balance
    Income/
Expense
   Yield/
Rate
 
Assets:                      

Securities (1)

   $ 28,394     $ 1,424    5.01 %   $ 31,504     $ 1,533    4.87 %   $ 38,141     $ 1,607    4.21 %

Loans (net of unearned income):

                     

Real estate mortgage

     121,144       7,653    6.32 %     114,500       6,837    5.97 %     97,888       5,503    5.62 %

Commercial

     76,326       5,744    7.53 %     73,529       5,207    7.08 %     70,573       4,540    6.43 %

Home equity lines

     13,738       1,151    8.38 %     15,286       1,242    8.13 %     15,636       985    6.30 %

Consumer

     3,069       284    9.25 %     2,962       271    9.15 %     2,319       205    8.84 %
                                                   

Total loans

     214,277       14,832    6.92 %     206,277       13,557    6.57 %     186,416       11,233    6.03 %

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

     3,019       125    4.14 %     2,385       109    4.57 %     2,481       81    3.26 %
                                                   

Total earning assets

     245,690       16,381    6.67 %     240,166       15,199    6.33 %     227,038       12,921    5.69 %
                                       

Less: allowance for loan losses

     (2,860 )          (2,873 )          (2,611 )     

Total nonearning assets

     20,394            19,239            19,841       
                                       

Total assets

   $ 263,224          $ 256,532          $ 244,268       
                                       
Liabilities                      

Interest-bearing deposits:

                     

Checking and savings

   $ 65,533     $ 959    1.46 %   $ 67,053     $ 641    0.96 %   $ 79,600     $ 620    0.78 %

Time deposits

     107,638       4,823    4.48 %     103,381       4,322    4.18 %     85,165       2,766    3.25 %
                                                   

Total interest-bearing deposits

     173,171       5,782    3.34 %     170,434       4,963    2.91 %     164,765       3,386    2.06 %

FHLB advances

     33,785       1,670    4.94 %     33,668       1,655    4.92 %     28,601       1,028    3.59 %
                                                   

Total interest-bearing liabilities

     206,956       7,452    3.60 %     204,102       6,618    3.24 %     193,366       4,414    2.28 %
                                 

Non-interest bearing liabilities:

                     

Demand deposits

     28,064            27,005            27,556       

Other liabilities

     1,035            475            554       
                                       

Total liabilities

     236,055            231,582            221,476       

Stockholders’ equity

     27,169            24,950            22,792       
                                       

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 263,224          $ 256,532          $ 244,268       
                                       

Net interest income (1)

     $ 8,929        $ 8,581        $ 8,507   
                                 

Interest rate spread (1)(2)(3)

        3.07 %        3.09 %        3.41 %

Net interest margin (1)(4)

        3.63 %        3.57 %        3.75 %

 

(1) Presented on a tax equivalent basis. The tax equivalent adjustment to net interest income was $125,000, $86,000 and $70,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
(2) Interest rate spread is the average yield earned on earning assets less the average rate incurred on interest-bearing liabilities.
(3) Net interest margin is derived by dividing net interest income by average total earning assets.

 

23


The following table describes the impact on the interest income of the Company resulting from changes in average balances and average rates for the periods indicated. The change in interest due to the mixture of volume and rate has been allocated solely to rate changes.

Volume and Rate Analysis

 

       Years Ended  
       December 31, 2007 compared to
December 31, 2006
    December 31, 2006 compared to
December 31, 2005
    December 31, 2005 compared to
December 31, 2004
 
       Change Due To:     Change Due To:     Change Due To:  
(Dollars In Thousands)    Volume     Rate     Increase
(Decrease)
    Volume     Rate     Increase
(Decrease)
    Volume     Rate     Increase
(Decrease)
 
Assets:                   

Securities

   $ (151 )   $ 42     $ (109 )   $ (280 )   $ 206     $ (74 )   $ (43 )   $ 53     $ 10  

Loans (net of unearned income):

                  

Real estate mortgage

     397       419       816       934       400       1,334       811       (39 )     772  

Commercial

     198       339       537       190       477       667       704       356       1,060  

Home equity lines

     (126 )     35       (91 )     (22 )     279       257       8       260       268  

Consumer

     10       3       13       57       9       66       (14 )     (1 )     (15 )
                                                                        

Total loans

     479       796       1,275       1,159       1,165       2,324       1,509       576       2,085  

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

     29       (13 )     16       (3 )     31       28       4       52       56  
                                                                        

Total earning assets

   $ 357     $ 825     $ 1,182     $ 876     $ 1,402     $ 2,278     $ 1,470     $ 681     $ 2,151  
                                                                        
Liabilities                   

Interest-bearing deposits:

                  

Checking and savings

   $ (15 )   $ 333     $ 318     $ (98 )   $ 119     $ 21     $ 32     $ 121     $ 153  

Time deposits

     178       323       501       592       964       1,556       1       206       207  
                                                                        

Total interest-bearing deposits

     163       656       819       494       1,083       1,577       33       327       360  

FHLB advances

     6       9       15       182       445       627       315       464       779  
                                                                        

Total interest-bearing liabilities

     169       665       834       676       1,528       2,204       348       791       1,139  
                                                                        

Change in net interest income

   $ 188     $ 160     $ 348     $ 200     $ (126 )   $ 74     $ 1,122     $ (110 )   $ 1,012  
                                                                        

Interest Sensitivity

Management evaluates interest rate sensitivity periodically through the use of an asset/liability management reporting model. Using this model, management determines the overall magnitude of interest sensitivity risk and then formulates policies governing asset generation and pricing, funding sources and pricing, and off-balance-sheet commitments in order to manage sensitivity risk. These decisions are based on management’s outlook regarding future interest rate movements, the state of the local and national economy, and other financial and business risk factors.

An important element of the Company’s asset/liability management process is monitoring its interest sensitivity gap. The interest sensitivity gap is the difference between interest sensitive assets and interest sensitive liabilities at a specific time interval. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities, and is considered negative when the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive assets during a given period. Generally, during a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap within shorter maturities would adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap within shorter maturities would result in an increase in net interest income. Conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap within shorter maturities would result in an increase in net interest income while a positive gap within shorter maturities would have the opposite effect. This gap can be managed by repricing assets or liabilities, by selling investments available for sale, by replacing an asset or liability at maturity, or by adjusting the interest rate during the life of an asset or liability. Matching the amounts of assets and liabilities maturing in the same time interval helps to hedge the risk and minimize the impact on net interest income in periods of rising or falling interest rates.

 

24


The following table presents the Company’s interest sensitivity position at December 31, 2007. This one-day position, which continually is changing, is not necessarily indicative of the Company’s position at any other time.

Interest Sensitivity Analysis

 

       December 31, 2007  
(Dollars In Thousands)    Within
90 Days
    91-365
Days
    1 to 5
Years
    Over 5
Years
    Total  
Interest-Earning Assets:           

Loans (1)

   $ 54,202     $ 73,519     $ 88,161     $ 5,704     $ 221,586  

Securities (2)

     2,352       2,002       12,366       6,174       22,894  

Money market and other short term securities

     4,037       —         —         —         4,037  

Other earning assets

     —         —         —         3,720       3,720  
                                        

Total earning assets

   $ 60,591     $ 75,521     $ 100,527     $ 15,598     $ 252,237  
                                        

Cumulative earning assets

   $ 60,591     $ 136,112     $ 236,639     $ 252,237     $ 252,237  
                                        
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:           

Money market savings

   $ 16,911     $ —       $ —       $ —       $ 16,911  

Interest checking (3)

     —         —         32,096       —         32,096  

Savings (3)

     2,306       1,053       14,577       —         17,936  

Certificates of deposit

     37,173       41,992       21,940       531       101,636  

FHLB advances

     11,700       7,000       22,000       417       41,117  
                                        

Total interest-bearing liabilities

   $ 68,090     $ 50,045     $ 90,613     $ 948     $ 209,696  
                                        

Cumulative interest-bearing liabilities

   $ 68,090     $ 118,135     $ 208,748     $ 209,696     $ 209,696  
                                        

Period gap

   $ (7,499 )   $ 25,476     $ 9,914     $ 14,650     $ 42,541  

Cumulative gap

   $ (7,499 )   $ 17,977     $ 27,891     $ 42,541     $ 42,541  

Ratio of cumulative interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities

     88.99 %     115.22 %     113.36 %     120.29 %     120.29 %

Ratio of cumulative gap to total earning assets

     -2.97 %     7.13 %     11.06 %     16.87 %     16.87 %

 

(1) Includes nonaccrual loans of $793,000, which are spread throughout the categories.
(2) All securities without specific maturities are included in the 1 to 5 years category since they are not considered as sensitive to interest rate changes.
(3) Management has determined that interest checking and savings accounts, excluding $996,000 in savings accounts with more frequent rate adjustment terms, are not sensitive to changes in related market rates and, therefore, they are placed in the 1 to 5 years and over 5 years categories, respectively.

Noninterest Income

2007 Compared to 2006

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company’s noninterest income was $3.40 million compared to $3.39 million in 2006. Noninterest income benefited from growth in mortgage banking fees and investments brokerage commissions, while a decline in loan production impacted loan fees during the year. Also impacting noninterest income for the year was a $135,500 decline in net gains from investing activities as compared to the prior year. Excluding gains from investing activities, core noninterest income increased 4.5% over that earned in 2006.

Mortgage banking fees increased 69.8% to $221,700 during 2007 as compared to 2006, while investment brokerage commissions grew to $387,400, or 14.9%, over the prior year. Although industry wide the mortgage banking business struggled and qualifying criteria became more stringent as a result of the subprime debacle, opportunities continued to exist in our markets for well qualified, long-term fixed rate loan products. These loans are pre-sold to third parties so the Company does not fund or securitize these products.

 

25


Accordingly, the Company does not have the exposure on its balance sheet and to its earnings that has plagued other companies in the financial services industry. Investment brokerage commissions benefited from increased activity and an increase in the Company’s commission percentage as a result of the improved production levels.

The Bank generates loan fees from late charges and prepayment penalties on loans and deposit account fees from charges related insufficient funds, check printing, cashiers checks, service charges, ATM, check cards and others. While these fees are generally core earnings that are not interest sensitive and have provided a stable source of income for the Bank, they can fluctuate during different economic cycles. With the reduction in gross loan production and loan prepayment activity, loan fees declined by 21% during 2007, while deposit account fees were relatively flat at $2.3 million during 2007 as a result of a flattening in courtesy overdraft fees generated. The Bank instituted a courtesy overdraft program during 2006 which, as expected, resulted in a significant increase in fees during 2006 over the prior year. However, also as anticipated, the initial boost in revenue realized during the first year of the program moderated to normal levels going forward.

2006 Compared to 2005

During 2006, the Company continued to benefit in growth of noninterest income, primarily in the areas of deposit account fees and investment brokerage commissions. During the year ended December 31, 2006, noninterest income increased to $3.39 million from $2.38 million in 2005, representing a 42.6% increase. The addition of a courtesy overdraft product helped increase deposit account fees to $2.29 million during 2006, representing a 70.2% increase over the $1.34 million generated in 2005. Deposit account fees consist of charges related insufficient funds, check printing, cashiers checks, service charges, ATM, check cards and others. These fees are core earnings that are not interest sensitive and have provided a stable source of income for the Bank.

Investment brokerage commissions benefited from increased production by the Company’s investment brokers during 2006, one of which was hired during 2005 with fifteen years experience. This resulted in an increase in investment brokerage commissions of 95.9% to $337,200, compared to $172,100 during 2005. The Company also experienced growth of 34.8% and 4.6% in loan fees and other income, respectively, and took advantage of investment portfolio profits by realizing $210,000 of net gains on sales of securities during 2006, compared to $315,900 of gains on the sales of investments and real estate in 2005. Loan fees primarily consist of late charges and prepayment penalties on loans and are also considered core earnings for the Bank.

Noninterest Expense

2007 Compared to 2006

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company’s noninterest expenses increased to $8.29 million from $7.74 million during 2006, while its efficiency ratio was 68.05% compared to 63.99% for 2006. As previously mentioned, the Company tackled many strategic initiatives during 2007 that will provide benefits going forward, but will impact noninterest expense in the short-term. One such initiative is rebuilding the Salisbury, Maryland branch facility which generated a $147,900 net loss upon disposal of the old facility. The 2007 expense included cost associated with opening the Bank’s eighth banking facility and additional personnel employed to enhance the Company’s loan administration, operations, mortgage banking and internet banking divisions, as well as, normal annual salary and benefit adjustments. Additionally, the Bank instituted a new marketing and branding program during the year that entailed a significant upfront investment, but will generate a more consistent message in the markets it serves.

 

26


As a result of the additional personnel, the new branch, normal salary and benefit adjustments and higher commissions paid to mortgage banking and investment brokerage employees due to production increases, compensation and benefits increased by 9.10% to $4.25 million during the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to $3.90 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. In spite of the branch addition and the leasing of two temporary locations due to the branch rebuild and branch relocation, occupancy and equipment expenses remained flat at $1.91 million during 2007, while data processing expenses increased a nominal 2.8% to $821,100. The new marketing and branding initiative caused marketing and promotion expenses to increase 54.7% to $204,700, while expenses related to the pending merger caused professional fees to increase 9.3% to $435,900. Other noninterest expenses increased to $670,300, or 11.6%, primarily resulting from higher employee expenses, courier costs and expenses related to increased check card and deposit account activity.

2006 Compared to 2005

During 2006, the Company’s noninterest expenses increased to $7.74 million from $6.64 million during 2005, while its efficiency ratio remained relatively flat at 63.99% compared to 63.54% for 2005. The majority of the increase occurred in compensation and benefits expense, primarily resulting from increases in commissions associated with operating the Company’s investment brokerage services, the expensing of stock options granted to non-executive employees and general increase in compensation and other benefits. Compensation and benefits increased by 24.0% to $3.90 million during the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to $3.14 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.

The Company also took on other customer service initiatives, including expansion of the Bank’s ATM network by seventeen machines, additional internet banking services and other new deposit products. As a result of these initiatives, occupancy and equipment expenses increased 9.8% to $1.91 million during 2006, compared to $1.74 million for 2005, while data processing costs, professional fees and other expenses increased 4.8%, 26.0% and 14.2%, respectively.

Provision for Loan Losses

2007 Compared to 2006

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company incurred a net reduction of $72,600 in the provision for loan losses, primarily resulting from an $118,000 downward adjustment to the allowance for loan losses. As discussed under the Asset Quality section below, management evaluates the allowance for loan losses on a regular basis using a methodology that considers various risk factors in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies . During the fourth quarter of 2007, the methodology revealed an excess in the allowance for loan losses and, accordingly, the Bank made the appropriate adjustment. Excluding this adjustment, the loan loss provision was $45,400 which primarily relates to the courtesy overdraft product and is fairly consistent with the $58,700 incurred during 2006.

2006 Compared to 2005

During 2006, the Company’s provision for loan losses was $58,700, primarily consisting of write-offs related to the Bank’s new courtesy overdraft product instituted during 2006. This amount represents a $245,000 decrease from the 2005 provision of $303,700, primarily resulting from the Bank’s methodology for evaluating the allowance for loan losses indicating that 2006 levels were commensurate with the risk existing in the Bank’s loan portfolio at that time.

 

27


Financial Condition

Loan Portfolio

The Bank’s loan portfolio is comprised of real estate mortgage loans, construction loans, commercial loans, home equity loans, and consumer loans. The primary market areas in which the Bank originates loans are the counties of Accomack and Northampton, Virginia, Salisbury/Wicomico County, Maryland and Pocomoke City/Worcester County, Maryland.

Total loans (excluding allowances for loan losses) increased to $221.6 million at December 31, 2007, a 5.2% increase over the $210.6 million outstanding at December 31, 2006. The growth resulted from gross loan production of approximately $66.4 million, primarily in the category of residential real estate. Residential real estate (including construction and land loans) increased 6.1% during 2007, while commercial loans grew 5.7% and consumer and home equity loans were flat during the year.

The following table summarizes the composition of the Bank’s loan portfolio at the dates indicated.

Loan Portfolio

 

       December 31,  
(Dollars In Thousands)    2007     2006     2005     2004     2003  

Residential mortgage

   $ 119,910     $ 111,890     $ 97,245     $ 86,537     $ 72,339  

Commercial mortgage

     69,448       64,698       61,917       59,414       39,621  

Commercial - other

     9,168       9,682       9,590       8,673       8,568  

Real estate construction (1)

     5,492       6,340       9,026       5,658       4,005  

Home equity lines of credit

     13,882       14,743       15,293       15,581       14,951  

Consumer

     3,842       3,381       2,559       2,378       2,508  
                                        

Total loans

     221,742       210,734       195,630       178,241       141,992  

Less:

          

Deferred loan (fees) cost, net

     (156 )     (136 )     (82 )     158       217  

Allowance for loan losses

     (2,699 )     (2,873 )     (2,851 )     (2,404 )     (2,002 )
                                        

Net loans

   $ 218,887     $ 207,725     $ 192,697     $ 175,995     $ 140,207  
                                        

 

(1) Amounts are disclosed net of loans in process of approximately $2.9 million, $2.8 million, $5.9 million, $4.2 million and $3.1 million for 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 

28


The following table sets forth the composition of the Bank’s loan portfolio by percentage at the dates indicated.

Loan Portfolio by Percentage

 

       December 31,  
       2007     2006     2005     2004     2003  

Residential mortgage

   54.08 %   53.10 %   49.71 %   48.55 %   50.95 %

Commercial mortgage

   31.32 %   30.70 %   31.65 %   33.33 %   27.90 %

Commercial - other

   4.13 %   4.59 %   4.90 %   4.87 %   6.03 %

Real estate construction

   2.48 %   3.01 %   4.61 %   3.18 %   2.82 %

Home equity lines of credit

   6.26 %   7.00 %   7.82 %   8.74 %   10.53 %

Consumer

   1.73 %   1.60 %   1.31 %   1.33 %   1.77 %
                              

Total loans

   100.00 %   100.00 %   100.00 %   100.00 %   100.00 %
                              

The following table presents the maturities of selected loans outstanding at December 31, 2007.

Maturity Schedule of Loans

 

       December 31, 2007
       Due in
one year
   Due after one
year through
five years
   Due after
five years
        Ater one year
(Dollars In Thousands)             Totals    Fixed
Rate
   Variable
Rate

Residential and commercial mortgages

   $ 23,683    $ 38,015    $ 127,503    $ 189,201    $ 35,067    $ 130,532

Commercial - other

     4,417      2,227      2,524      9,168      1,564      3,187

Real estate construction

     5,492      0      0      5,492      0      0

Home equity lines of credit

     13,882      0      0      13,882      0      0

Consumer

     2,594      926      322      3,842      1,164      84
                                         

Total

   $ 50,068    $ 41,168    $ 130,349    $ 221,585    $ 37,795    $ 133,803
                                         

Securities

When securities are purchased, they are classified as securities held to maturity if management has the positive intent and the Company has the ability to hold them until maturity. These investment securities are carried at cost adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discounts. Unrealized losses in the portfolio are not recognized unless management of the Company believes that other than a temporary decline has occurred. Securities held for indefinite periods of time and not intended to be held to maturity are classified as available for sale at the time of purchase. Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value. The net unrealized holding gain or loss on securities available for sale, net of deferred income taxes, is included in other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. A decline in the fair value of any securities available for sale below cost, that is deemed other than temporary, is charged to earnings and results in a new cost basis for the security. Cost of securities sold is determined on the basis of specific identification. The Company holds no securities classified as trading.

Investment Securities. The carrying value of investment securities (effected for all applicable fair value adjustments) amounted to $22.9 million at December 31, 2007, compared to $30.4 million and $32.4 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Decreases in securities primarily resulted from loan demand during 2005 through 2007, slow deposit growth during these periods and few adequate return opportunities in the investment market. The comparison of amortized cost to fair value is shown in Note 3 of the notes to the financial statements. Note 3 also provides an analysis of gross unrealized gains and losses of investment securities. Investment securities consist of the following:

 

29


Investment Securities Portfolio

 

       Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars In Thousands)    2007    2006    2005
Amortized Cost:         

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies

   $ 7,959    $ 12,942    $ 17,546

Tax-exempt municipal bonds

     6,413      6,414      3,996

Mortgage-backed securities

     1,056      1,263      1,528

Corporate bonds

     1,000      2,003      2,008

Common stock

     2,425      2,271      1,989

Preferred stock

     1,864      2,898      1,898

Other equity securities

     —        —        817
                    

Total available for sale securities

     20,717      27,791      29,782

Other investment securities

     2,670      2,443      2,461
                    

Total securities

   $ 23,387    $ 30,234    $ 32,243
                    

Securities Available for Sale. Securities available for sale are used as part of the Company’s interest rate risk management strategy and may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, liquidity needs, the need to increase regulatory capital and other factors. The fair value of securities available for sale totaled $20.2 million at December 31, 2007, compared to $28.0 million and $29.9 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The comparison of fair market value to amortized cost is shown in Note 3 of the notes to the financial statements. Note 3 also provides an analysis of gross unrealized gains and losses of securities available for sale. The following summarizes available for sale securities for the respective periods.

Securities Available for Sale

 

       Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars In Thousands)    2007    2006    2005
Fair Value:         

U.S. Treasury and other U.S.government agencies

   $ 8,056    $ 12,739    $ 17,287

Tax-exempt municipal bonds

     6,433      6,414      3,988

Mortgage-backed securities

     1,047      1,221      1,492

Corporate bonds

     1,004      2,022      2,060

Common stock

     1,928      2,691      2,369

Preferred stock

     1,756      2,878      1,897

Other equity securities

     —        —        797
                    

Total available for sale securities

     20,224      27,965      29,890

Other investment securities

     2,670      2,443      2,461
                    

Total securities

   $ 22,894    $ 30,408    $ 32,351
                    

 

30


The following table sets forth the maturity distribution and weighted average yields of the securities portfolio at December 31, 2007. The weighted average yields are calculated on the basis of carrying value of the investment portfolio and on the interest income of investments adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount.

Maturities of Investments

 

       Available-for-Sale  
(Dollars In Thousands)    Amortized
Cost
   Fair
Market
Value
   Weighted
Average
Yield
 

U.S. Government Agencies and other U.S. securities:

        

Within one year

   $ 1,000    $ 998    4.00 %

After one year to five years

     5,982      6,034    4.30 %

After five years

     977      1,024    4.99 %
                    

Total

     7,959      8,056    4.34 %
                    

Municipal Securities:

        

Within one year

     —        —      0.00 %

After one year to five years

     2,388      2,395    3.52 %

After five years

     4,025      4,038    3.88 %
                    
     6,413      6,433    3.74 %
                    

Mortgage Backed Securities:

        

Within one year

     —        —      0.00 %

After one year to five years

     255      252    3.47 %

After five years

     801      795    4.80 %
                    
     1,056      1,047    4.48 %
                    

Corporate Bonds:

        

Within one year

     1,000      1,004    6.24 %

After one year to five years

     —        —      0.00 %

After five years

     —        —      0.00 %
                    
     1,000      1,004    6.24 %
                    

Other Securities:

        

No stated maturity

     6,959      6,354    5.42 %
                    

Total securities

   $ 23,387    $ 22,894    4.59 %
                    

 

31


Deposits

The Bank depends on deposits to fund its lending activities, generate fee income opportunities, and create a captive market for loan products. The table below presents a history of average deposits and the rates paid on interest-bearing deposit accounts for the periods indicated.

Average Deposits and Average Rates Paid

 

       Years Ended December 31,  
       2007     2006     2005  
(Dollars In Thousands)    Average
Balance
   Average
Rate
    Average
Balance
   Average
Rate
    Average
Balance
   Average
Rate
 

Interest-bearing deposits:

               

Checking and savings

   $ 65,533    1.46 %   $ 67,053    0.96 %   $ 79,600    0.78 %

Certificates of deposit:

               

Less than $100,000

     78,968    4.42 %     77,327    4.10 %     66,146    3.16 %

$100,000 and over

     28,670    4.66 %     26,054    4.42 %     19,019    3.54 %
                                       

Total interest-bearing deposits

     173,171    3.34 %     170,434    2.91 %     164,765    2.06 %

Noninterest-bearing deposits

     28,064    0.00 %     27,005    0.00 %     27,556    0.00 %
                                       

Total average deposits

   $ 201,235    2.87 %   $ 197,439    2.51 %   $ 192,321    1.76 %
                                       

Deposits averaged $201.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2007, an increase of 1.9% and 4.6% over the $197.4 million and $192.3 million during 2006 and 2005, respectively. Certificates of deposit accounted for the largest portion of the increase, followed by noninterest-bearing demand deposits.

The following table is a summary of the maturity distribution of certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2007.

Maturities of CD’s of $100,000 or More

 

       December 31, 2007  
(Dollars In Thousands)    Amount    Percent  

Three months or less

   $ 10,447    37.19 %

Over three months to one year

     11,363    40.45 %

Over one year to five years

     6,282    22.36 %

Over five years

     —      0.00 %
             

Total

   $ 28,092    100.00 %
             

Capital Resources

Capital represents funds, earned or obtained, over which banks can exercise greater control in comparison with deposits and borrowed funds. The adequacy of the Company’s capital is reviewed by management on an ongoing basis with reference to the size, composition, and quality of the Company’s resources and consistent with regulatory requirements and industry standards. Management seeks to maintain a capital structure that will support anticipated asset growth and absorb potential losses.

 

32


Banking regulations established to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2007, that the Company meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

The following table details the components of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital and related ratios for the periods indicated.

Analysis of Capital

 

     December 31,  
(Dollars In Thousands)    2007     2006  

Tier 1 Capital:

    

Common stock

   $ 688     $ 687  

Additional paid-in capital

     8,400       8,373  

Retained earnings

     18,959       16,953  

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     (326 )     113  
                

Total capital (GAAP)

     27,721       26,126  

Less: Intangibles

     (340 )     (402 )

Net unrealized gain (loss) on debt and equity securities

     326       (113 )

Net unrealized losses on equity securities

     (399 )     —    
                

Total Tier 1 capital

     27,308       25,611  

Tier 2 Capital:

    

Allowable allowances for loan losses

     2,341       2,269  

Net unrealized gains on equity securities

     15       180  
                

Total Tier 2 capital

   $ 29,664     $ 28,060  
                

Risk-weighted assets

   $ 190,197     $ 185,991  

Capital Ratios (1):

    

Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio

     14.36 %     13.77 %

Total risk-based capital ratio

     15.60 %     15.09 %

Tier 1 capital to average adjusted total assets

     10.28 %     9.93 %

 

(1) The required minimum capital ratios for capital adequacy purposes, as defined collectively by the federal banking agencies, for Tier 1 risk-based capital, total risk-based capital, and Tier 1 capital to average adjusted assets was 4.0%, 8.0% and 4.0%, respectively. To be considered “well capitalized” under federal prompt corrective action regulations, these same required ratios are 6.0%, 10.0% and 5.0%, respectively. See Note 11 of the notes to the financial statements for a detail of the capital ratios.

Asset Quality

Allowance for loan losses . The allowance for loan losses represents an amount management believes is adequate to provide for probable loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management evaluates the allowance for loan losses on a regular basis using a methodology that considers various risk factors in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies . This methodology includes analyzing historical loan losses, existing doubtful accounts, the experience of its lenders, growth by loan category, specific

 

33


loan risk (i.e. construction loans), economic conditions and loan to value considerations. The outcome of this methodology results in range that is used to determine the Bank’s allowance for loan losses. However, risks of future losses cannot be quantified precisely or attributed to particular loans or classes of loans. Because those risks are influenced by general economic trends as well as conditions affecting individual borrowers, management’s judgment of the allowance is necessarily approximate and imprecise. The allowance is also subject to regulatory examinations and determinations as to adequacy, which may take into account such factors as the methodology used to calculate the allowance and the size of the allowance in comparison to peer banks identified by regulatory agencies.

Set forth below is a table detailing the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

     Years Ended December 31,  
(Dollars In Thousands)    2007     2006     2005     2004     2003  

Balance, beginning of period

   $ 2,873     $ 2,851     $ 2,404     $ 2,002     $ 1,603  

Loans charged off:

          

Commercial

     (43 )     —         (29 )     (11 )     —    

Real estate mortgage

     —         —         —         —         (4 )

Consumer

     (166 )     (108 )     (18 )     (27 )     (24 )
                                        

Total loans charged-off

     (209 )     (108 )     (47 )     (38 )     (28 )
                                        

Recoveries:

          

Commercial

     —         19       172       11       —    

Real estate mortgage

     —         —         —         —         —    

Consumer

     108       52       18       10       47  
                                        

Total recoveries

     108       71       190       21       47  
                                        

Net recoveries (charge-offs)

     (101 )     (37 )     143       (17 )     19  

Provision (recovery) for loan losses

     (73 )     59       304       419       380  
                                        

Balance, end of period

   $ 2,699     $ 2,873     $ 2,851     $ 2,404     $ 2,002  
                                        

Allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding at end of period

     1.22 %     1.36 %     1.49 %     1.35 %     1.41 %

Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans outstanding at end of period

     340.35 %     308.59 %     267.95 %     253.05 %     362.68 %

Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding during period

     0.05 %     0.02 %     -0.08 %     0.01 %     -0.01 %

During 2007, as has been the case over the past five years, the Bank’s charge-offs continued to be minimal. Over the past five years, charge-offs have primarily occurred in the consumer loan category. During 2004, the Bank obtained possession of property related to a loan of which $172,000 was charged during 2001. During 2005, the Bank sold the property, recovered all deficient amounts and recognized a gain of $149,000.

Although growth in the Bank’s loan portfolio during 2007 primarily occurred in the residential real estate category, a continued emphasis has been placed on growing the commercial and consumer loan categories over the last several years. Increased competition in the real estate mortgage arena and the desire to diversify contributed to this shift in lending and customer relationships. However, with this change comes increased risk associated with potential loan losses. Based on the results of management’s analysis, it believes that allowances for losses existing at December 31, 2007 are sufficient to cover any anticipated or unanticipated losses on loans outstanding in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies .

 

34


An allocation of the allowance for loan losses in dollars and as a percent of the total allowance is provided in the following tables. Because all of these factors are subject to change, the allocation is not necessarily predictive of future loan losses in the indicated categories.

Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses

 

     Commercial     Real Estate     Consumer  
(Dollars In Thousands)    Allowance
for Loan
Losses
   Percentage
of Loan
Allowance
    Allowance
for Loan
Losses
   Percentage
of Loan
Allowance
    Allowance
for Loan
Losses
   Percentage
of Loan
Allowance
 

December 31,

               

2007

   $ 1,664    61.67 %   $ 864    32.00 %   $ 171    6.33 %

2006

     1,846    64.25 %     864    30.06 %     163    5.68 %

2005

     1,949    68.37 %     242    8.49 %     660    23.14 %

2004

     1,556    64.73 %     242    10.07 %     606    25.20 %

2003

     1,175    58.69 %     278    13.89 %     549    27.42 %

The following table details information concerning nonaccrual and past due loans, as well as foreclosed assets.

Nonperforming Assets

 

     December 31,  
(Dollars In Thousands)    2007     2006     2005     2004     2003  

Nonaccrual loans:

          

Commercial

   $ 135     $ 73     $ 194     $ 374     $ 126  

Real estate mortgage

     482       832       811       272       321  

Home equity lines of credit

     171       24       —         120       28  

Consumer

     5       2       59       184       77  
                                        

Total nonaccrual loans

     793       931       1,064       950       552  

Other real estate owned

     —         —         —         —         —    
                                        

Total nonperforming assets

   $ 793     $ 931     $ 1,064     $ 950     $ 552  
                                        

Loans past due 90 or more days accruing interest

     —         —         —         —         —    

Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans

     340.35 %     308.59 %     267.95 %     253.05 %     362.68 %

Nonperforming assets to period end loans and other real estate owned

     0.36 %     0.44 %     0.56 %     0.53 %     0.39 %

Total nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans and foreclosed properties that are not producing income for the Bank. The Bank’s policy is that whenever a loan reaches 90 days delinquent interest accruals are suspended until six months after the loan becomes current again. In recent years, the Bank has experienced strong asset quality in its loan portfolio. Over the period, low interest rates and a strong real estate market created a vibrant lending environment and provided borrowers the opportunity to finance larger purchases at lower costs. Accordingly, trends in total nonperforming assets and the related ratios have been relatively positive for the periods presented.

At December 31, 2007, no loans were identified by the Bank as impaired as defined by generally accepted accounting principles and, accordingly, no specific allowances were provided with respect to impaired loans. At December 31, 2006, the Bank identified

 

35


one loan totaling $3,000 as impaired. However, the Bank did not allocate a valuation allowance for this loan at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2005, the Bank identified $314,000 of loans as impaired with a valuation allowance allocation of $47,000. At December 31, 2004, no loans were identified by the Bank as impaired and, accordingly, no specific allowances were provided with respect to impaired loans. At December 31, 2003, the Bank identified one impaired loan totaling $126,000 with no valuation allowance being place on this loan. The Bank obtained and sold the collateral for this loan during the first quarter of 2004 with the net proceeds being sufficient to satisfy all principal and interest amounts due.

In conjunction with the methodology described above to calculate the allowance for loan losses, the Bank closely monitors individual loans that are deemed to be potential problem loans. Loans are viewed as potential problem loans when possible credit problems of borrowers or industry trends cause management to have doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with current repayment terms. Those loans are subject to regular management attention, and their status is reviewed on a regular basis. In instances where management determines that a specific allowance should be set, the Bank takes such action as deemed appropriate.

As of December 31, 2007, all loans 60 days or more delinquent, including nonperforming loans, totaled $1.39 million. Additionally, other performing loans totaling $7.68 million existed that were current, but had other potential weaknesses that management considers to warrant additional monitoring. All loans in these categories are subject to constant management attention, and their status is reviewed on a regular basis. These loans are generally secured by residential and commercial real estate and equipment with appraised values that exceed the remaining principal balances on such loans.

Liquidity; Asset Management

Liquidity represents the Company’s ability to meet present and future obligations through the sale or maturity of existing assets or the acquisition of additional funds through liability management. Liquid assets include cash, interest-bearing deposits with banks, federal funds sold, investments maturing within one year, and investments that are categorized as available-for-sale. The Company’s ability to obtain deposits and purchase funds at favorable rates impacts its liability liquidity. As a result of the Company’s management of liquid assets and the ability to generate liquidity through liability funding, management believes that the Company maintains overall liquidity that is sufficient to satisfy its depositor’s requirements and meet its customers’ credit needs.

The table below summarizes the Company’s balance sheet liquidity position for the periods presented. Additionally, alternative sources of liquidity are available to the Company in the wholesale funding markets including its capacity to borrow additional funds or purchase brokered certificates of deposits. The Bank has an available line of credit with the FHLB for up to 25% of Bank assets, or approximately $66.1 million at December 31, 2007. However, the Bank may request an increase in this borrowing capacity from the FHLB. At December 31, 2007, the Bank had sufficient collateral pledged to borrow a total of approximately $87.3 million from the FHLB. The borrowing capacity is subject to certain collateral requirements as stipulated in the FHLB borrowing agreement. Additionally, the Bank maintains available borrowing arrangements of approximately $8.5 million with other institutions. Based on these factors, the Company maintains sufficient liquidity to meet anticipated needs.

 

36


Summary of Liquid Assets

 

     December 31,  
(Dollars In Thousands)    2007     2006     2005  

Cash and due from banks

   $ 11,265     $ 9,470     $ 9,176  

Available-for-sale and other securities

     22,894       30,408       32,351  
                        

Total liquid assets

   $ 34,159     $ 39,878     $ 41,527  
                        

Deposits and other liabilities

   $ 238,912     $ 234,550     $ 223,790  
                        

Ratio of liquid assets to deposits and other liabilities

     14.30 %     17.00 %     18.56 %
                        

Total cash and cash equivalents were $11.3 million at December 31, 2007, compared to $9.5 million and $9.2 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net cash flows from operating activities were $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to $3.7 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. This fluctuation primarily resulted from net income growth and other changes in normal operating activities during the periods.

Net cash flows used for investing activities were $5.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to $13.2 million and $11.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Loan growth declined in 2007 with net originations of $11.1 million, compared to net originations of $15.1 million and $17.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Other investment activities continued to be slow due to liquidity needs for loan growth.

Net cash flows from financing activities were $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to $9.8 million and $7.8 million during 2006 and 2005, respectively. Deposits declined $1.5 million in 2007, primarily due to run off of retail time deposits and maturing brokered time deposits, compared to growth of $9.1 million during 2006 and a decline of $3.8 million in 2005. As has been the case over the past three year, the Bank’s deposit markets continued to be very competitive during 2007, resulting in a more challenging environment to grow retail deposits profitably. Therefore, wholesale funding sources continued to be used during 2007 to fund liquidity shortfalls. During 2006, the Bank purchased $7.0 million of brokered time deposits since they were a less expensive alternative funding source to FHLB advances at that time. However, this wholesale product was less competitive during 2007 and, therefore, the Bank relied more heavily on FHLB borrowings to meet liquidity shortfalls. Net FHLB borrowings increased $5.9 million during 2007, while they were fairly flat at $1.2 million during 2006 and increased $12.1 million during 2005.

The Bank occasionally finds it necessary to borrow funds on a short-term basis due to fluctuations in loan and deposit levels. As discussed above, the Bank has arrangements with the FHLB and other institutions whereby it may borrow funds overnight and on terms. At December 31, 2007, the Bank had $41.1 million in outstanding FHLB advances, compared to $35.2 million at December 31, 2006.

 

37


The following table details information concerning the Bank’s short-term borrowings for the periods presented.

Summary of Borrowed Funds

 

     December 31,  
(Dollars In Thousands)    2007     2006     2005  

Actual period end balances

   $ 18,700     $ 24,750     $ 25,500  

Monthly average balance of short-term borrowings outstanding during the period

   $ 16,276     $ 19,542     $ 21,033  

Weighted-average interest rate on monthly average short-term borrowings

     5.29 %     5.09 %     3.34 %

Maximum month-end balance of short-term borrowings outstanding during the period

   $ 23,150     $ 29,150     $ 28,500  

Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments

The following table summarizes the Company’s significant contractual obligations, contingent liabilities and certain other commitments outstanding at December 31, 2007:

Contractural Obligations, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments

 

     Payments Due By Period

Contractural Obligations

   Total    Less Than
1 Year
   1-3 Years    3-5 Years    More Than
5 Years
(Dollars In Thousands)                         

Operating lease obligations

   $ 329    $ 135    $ 170    $ 24    $ —  

Other long-term liabilities reflected on the Company’s balance sheet under GAAP Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

     41,117      18,700      17,000      5,000      417

Other commitments

              

Standby letters of credit

     1,797      1,797      —        —        —  

Commitments to extend credit

     48,040      48,040      —        —        —  
                                  

Total contractual obligations

   $ 91,283    $ 68,672    $ 17,170    $ 5,024    $ 417
                                  

 

38


Return on Equity and Assets

The following table summarizes ratios considered to be significant indicators of the Company’s profitability and financial condition during the periods indicated.

Return on Equity and Assets

 

     December 31,  
     2007     2006     2005  

Return on average assets

   1.04 %   1.14 %   1.10 %

Return on average equity

   10.05 %   11.76 %   11.74 %

Average equity to average asset ratio

   10.32 %   9.73 %   9.33 %

Dividend payout ratio

   26.61 %   21.19 %   20.16 %

Critical Accounting Policies and Judgments

The accounting principles followed by the Company and the methods of applying these principles conform with generally accepted accounting principles and to general practices within the banking industry. Our most critical accounting policies require management’s judgment to ascertain the valuation of assets, liabilities, commitments and contingencies. These policies require the use of subjective and complex estimates, assumptions and judgments, which are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements and are important to our reported financial condition and results of operations. Accordingly, as this information changes, our financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported.

The allowance for loan losses is established and maintained at levels management deems adequate to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio, based upon our evaluation of the risks in the portfolio and changes in the nature and volume of loan activity. Management evaluates the allowance for loan losses on a regular basis using a methodology that considers historical loan losses, existing doubtful accounts, the experience of its lenders, growth by loan category, specific loan risk (i.e. construction loans), economic conditions and loan to value considerations. Additionally, we consider the impact of economic events and other market factors, the outcome of which is uncertain. While we use the best information available in establishing the allowance, actual economic conditions differing significantly from our assumptions in determining the loan loss valuation allowance may result in future adjustments, or regulators may require adjustments based upon information available to them at the time of their examinations. Although we believe that our allowance for loan losses is adequate and properly recorded in our financial statements, differing economic conditions or alternate methods of estimation could result in materially different amounts of loan losses.

The estimation of fair value is significant to several of our assets, including available-for-sale (“AFS”) investment securities and OREO. AFS securities are recorded at fair value, while OREO is generally recorded at the lower of cost or fair value (less estimated selling costs). Fair values can be volatile and may be influenced by a number of factors, including market interest rates, prepayment speeds, discount rates and market conditions, among others. Since these factors can change significantly and rapidly, fair values are difficult to predict and are subject to material changes, which could impact our financial condition.

 

39


Impact of Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140.” This statement amends Statements No. 133 and 140 by: permitting fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument with an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation; clarifying which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of Statement No. 133; establishing a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; clarifying that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and amending Statement No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. The statement was effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.” This statement amends Statement No. 140 with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. It requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time an obligation is undertaken to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain situations, and requires all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. The statement permits the choice between the “amortization method” and the “fair value measurement method” for the subsequent measurement of the servicing assets or liabilities, and allows for a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to trading securities at initial adoption. The statement also requires separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the statement of financial position, and additional disclosures for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The statement was effective for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2006. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement 109,” which provides guidance on the measurement, recognition, and disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, and disclosure. FIN 48 prescribes that a tax position should only be recognized if it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority. A tax position that meets this threshold is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is more likely than not (greater than 50 percent) realized upon ultimate settlement. The cumulative effect of applying FIN 48 is to be reported as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. FIN 48 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. While the Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, it does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In addition, the Statement establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. Lastly, SFAS No. 157 requires additional disclosures for each interim and annual period separately for each major category of assets and liabilities. The Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

40


In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”, which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and also establishes fair presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), Business Combinations , which replaces SFAS 141. This Statement establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired in the business combination, liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree as well as the goodwill acquired in a business combination. SFAS 141(R) also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable the users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combinations. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS 141(R) on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – Amendment of ARB No. 51 , which establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest, and the valuation of retained non-controlling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS 160 also establishes expanded disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interest of the parent’s owners and the interests of the non-controlling owners of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 160 on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Effects of Inflation

The Company believes that its net interest income and results of operations have not been significantly affected by inflation during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.

 

41


Item 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company uses a third party provider to perform computer modeling methodologies that assist in determining the overall magnitude of interest sensitivity risk. Based on these methodologies, management formulates policies governing asset generation and pricing, funding sources and pricing, and off-balance-sheet commitments in order to reduce sensitivity risk. These decisions are based on management’s outlook regarding future interest rate movements, the state of the local and national economy, and other financial and business risk factors.

The modeling methodologies used measure interest rate sensitivity by analyzing the potential impact on net interest income under various interest rate scenarios. One such scenario would assume a hypothetical 200 basis point instantaneous and parallel shift in the yield curve in interest rates. Accordingly, management modeled the impact of a 200 basis point decline in interest rates and a 200 basis point increase in interest rates at December 31, 2007. The model indicates that a 200 basis point instantaneous and parallel decrease in the yield curve in interest rates would cause net interest income to decrease by $206,000, while a 200 basis point instantaneous and parallel increase in the yield curve in interest rates would cause net interest income to increase by $61,000.

The computer model uses standard algebraic formula for calculating present value. The calculation discounts the future cash flows of the Company’s portfolio of interest rate sensitive instruments to present value utilizing techniques designed to approximate current market rates for securities, current offering rates for loans, and the cost of alternative funding for the given maturity of deposits and then assumes an instantaneous and parallel shift in these rates. The difference between these numbers represents the resulting hypothetical change in the fair value of interest rate sensitive instruments.

As with any modeling techniques, certain limitations and shortcomings are inherent in the Company’s methodology. Significant assumptions must be made in the calculation including: (1) no growth in volume or balance sheet mix; (2) constant market interest rates reflecting the average rate from the last month of the given quarter; and (3) pricing spreads to market rates derived from an historical analysis, or from assumptions by instrument type. Additionally, the computations do not contemplate certain actions management could undertake in response to changes in interest rates.

 

42


Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

 

     December 31,
2007
    December 31,
2006

ASSETS

    

Cash (including interest-earning deposits of approximately $4,036,500 and $2,267,000, respectively)

   $ 11,265,300     $ 9,469,800

Investment securities:

    

Available-for-sale (amortized cost of $20,716,600 and $27,791,300, respectively)

     20,224,400       27,965,300

Other investments, at cost

     2,669,600       2,442,700

Loans receivable, net

     218,887,300       207,725,200

Premises and equipment, net

     7,371,000       7,044,300

Other assets

     6,249,700       6,028,700
              

Total Assets

   $ 266,667,300     $ 260,676,000
              

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

Deposits:

    

Interest-bearing

   $ 168,579,200     $ 172,548,300

Noninterest-bearing

     27,984,700       25,554,500
              

Total deposits

     196,563,900       198,102,800

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

     41,116,700       35,233,300

Other liabilities

     1,266,000       1,213,600
              

Total liabilities

     238,946,600       234,549,700
              

Stockholders’ equity

    

Preferred stock, par value $1 per share, 500,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding

     —         —  

Common stock, par value $.275; 6,000,000 shares authorized; 2,500,927 and 2,497,327 issued and outstanding, respectively

     687,800       686,800

Additional capital

     8,400,000       8,372,600

Retained earnings

     18,959,200       16,953,400

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

     (326,300 )     113,500
              

Total stockholders’ equity

     27,720,700       26,126,300
              

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

   $ 266,667,300     $ 260,676,000
              

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

43


Consolidated Statements of Income

 

     Years Ended December 31,
     2007     2006    2005

Interest and dividend income

       

Loans

   $ 14,832,300     $ 13,556,500    $ 11,232,700

Investments

       

Taxable interest

     911,700       1,143,900      1,307,600

Tax-exempt interest

     241,600       167,400      135,600

Dividends

     271,100       244,700      174,600
                     

Total interest and dividend income

     16,256,700       15,112,500      12,850,500
                     

Interest expense

       

Deposits

     5,782,500       4,962,700      3,385,900

FHLB/other advances

     1,669,800       1,654,800      1,028,100
                     

Total interest expense

     7,452,300       6,617,500      4,414,000
                     

Net interest income

     8,804,400       8,495,000      8,436,500

Provision (recovery) for loan losses

     (72,600 )     58,700      303,700
                     

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

     8,877,000       8,436,300      8,132,800
                     

Noninterest income

       

Deposit account fees

     2,319,100       2,286,400      1,343,100

Loan fees

     125,700       159,100      118,000

Mortgage banking fees

     221,700       130,600      173,400

Commissions on investment brokerage sales

     387,400       337,200      172,100

Gains from investment securities activities

     74,500       210,000      166,400

Gains on sale of real estate

     —         —        149,500

Other

     272,000       268,600      256,900
                     

Total noninterest income

     3,400,400       3,391,900      2,379,400
                     

Noninterest expense

       

Compensation and employee benefits

     4,254,000       3,897,600      3,144,100

Occupancy and equipment

     1,906,200       1,911,000      1,740,800

Data processing

     821,100       799,000      762,200

Professional fees

     435,900       398,900      316,700

Marketing and promotion

     204,700       132,300      148,200

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

     147,900       —        6,500

Other

     670,300       600,400      525,600
                     

Total noninterest expense

     8,440,100       7,739,200      6,644,100
                     

Income before income taxes

     3,837,300       4,089,000      3,868,100

Income taxes

     1,106,700       1,155,900      1,192,800
                     

Net income

   $ 2,730,600     $ 2,933,100    $ 2,675,300
                     

Earnings Per Common Share:

       

Basic

   $ 1.09     $ 1.18    $ 1.08
                     

Diluted

   $ 1.08     $ 1.16    $ 1.06
                     

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

44


Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

 

     Number of
Shares
   Common
Stock
   Additional
Capital
   Retained
Earnings
    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
    Total  

Balance, December 31, 2004

   2,063,284    $ 680,900    $ 8,199,000    $ 12,494,400     $ 584,700     $ 21,959,000  

Common stock cash dividend declared

   —        —        —        (538,300 )     —         (538,300 )

Exercise of stock options, net of 1,492 of existing shares exchanged in lieu of exercise payment

   10,923      3,600      59,100      —         —         62,700  

Tax benefit associated with the exercise of stock options

   —        —        9,300      —         —         9,300  

Comprehensive income (loss)

   —        —        —        2,675,300       (539,400 )     2,135,900  
                                           

Balance, December 31, 2005

   2,074,207      684,500      8,267,400      14,631,400       45,300       23,628,600  

Common stock cash dividend declared

   —        —        —        (610,300 )     —         (610,300 )

Exercise of stock options

   7,804      2,300      53,900      —         —         56,200  

Compensation expense associated with the granting of stock options

   —        —        40,400      —         —         40,400  

Tax benefit associated with the exercise of stock options

   —        —        10,900      —         —         10,900  

6-for-5 Stock Split

   415,316      —        —        (800 )     —         (800 )

Comprehensive income

   —        —        —        2,933,100       68,200       3,001,300  
                                           

Balance, December 31, 2006

   2,497,327      686,800      8,372,600      16,953,400       113,500       26,126,300  

Common stock cash dividend declared

   —        —        —        (724,800 )     —         (724,800 )

Exercise of stock options

   3,600      1,000      21,700      —         —         22,700  

Tax benefit associated with the exercise of stock options

   —        —        5,700      —         —         5,700  

Comprehensive income (loss)

   —        —        —        2,730,600       (439,800 )     2,290,800  
                                           

Balance, December 31, 2007

   2,500,927    $ 687,800    $ 8,400,000    $ 18,959,200     $ (326,300 )   $ 27,720,700  
                                           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

45


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

     Years Ended December 31,  
     2007     2006     2005  

Cash flows from operating activities

      

Net income

   $ 2,730,600     $ 2,933,100     $ 2,675,300  

Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Provision (recovery of provision) for loan losses

     (72,600 )     58,700       303,700  

Depreciation and amortization

     688,900       746,200       731,500  

Gains from investment securities activities

     (74,500 )     (210,000 )     (166,400 )

Gain on sale of real estate

     —         —         (149,500 )

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

     147,900       —         6,500  

Other noncash operating activities

     (163,900 )     (104,600 )     (59,800 )

Changes in:

      

Deferred loan fees

     19,600       54,000       (34,100 )

Other assets

     (68,300 )     (213,400 )     (75,000 )

Other liabilities

     220,100       443,000       (255,100 )
                        

Net cash flows from operating activities

     3,427,800       3,707,000       2,977,100  
                        

Cash flows from investing activities

      

Purchase of available-for-sale securities

     (828,500 )     (4,984,900 )     (3,108,400 )

Proceeds from maturities, sales and calls of available-for-sale securities

     7,989,200       7,194,200       9,716,600  

Purchase of other investments

     (2,438,000 )     (2,804,500 )     (3,709,300 )

Proceeds from maturities, sales and calls of other investments

     2,211,100       2,822,700       2,981,300  

Proceeds from sale of real estate

     —         —         323,100  

Loan originations, net of repayments

     (11,109,100 )     (15,141,400 )     (17,144,500 )

Purchase of premises and equipment

     (1,099,400 )     (260,800 )     (115,200 )
                        

Net cash flows from investing activities

     (5,274,700 )     (13,174,700 )     (11,056,400 )
                        

 

46


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

     Years Ended December 31,  
     2007     2006     2005  

Cash flows from financing activities

      

Net increase (decrease) in demand deposits

   $ 8,729,700     $ (13,911,500 )   $ (2,177,400 )

Net increase (decrease) in time deposits

     (10,268,600 )     23,043,800       (1,590,000 )

Proceeds from FHLB advances

     300,900,000       169,400,000       133,600,000  

Repayments of FHLB advances

     (295,016,600 )     (168,216,700 )     (121,516,700 )

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

     22,700       56,200       62,700  

Payment of dividends on common stock

     (724,800 )     (610,300 )     (538,300 )
                        

Net cash flows from financing activities

     3,642,400       9,761,500       7,840,300  
                        

Change in cash and cash equivalents

     1,795,500       293,800       (239,000 )

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

     9,469,800       9,176,000       9,415,000  
                        

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

   $ 11,265,300     $ 9,469,800     $ 9,176,000  
                        

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

      

Cash paid during the period for interest

   $ 7,400,600     $ 6,204,300     $ 4,288,700  

Cash paid during the period for income taxes

   $ 1,265,000     $ 1,220,000     $ 1,158,500  

Conversion of Trust Preferred Stock investment to common stock

   $ —       $ —         72,000  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

47


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

Shore Financial Corporation (the “Company”) is a Virginia corporation organized in September 1997 by Shore Bank (the “Bank”) for the purpose of becoming a unitary holding company of the Bank. The Company became a unitary holding company of the Bank on March 16, 1998. The business and management of the Company consists of the business and management of the Bank. The Bank became a Virginia chartered, Federal Reserve member, commercial bank on March 31, 1998. Previously, the Bank was a federally chartered savings bank. The Company and the Bank are headquartered on the Eastern Shore in Onley, Virginia.

The Company’s assets primarily consist of approximately $4.7 million in cash and investments and its investment in the Bank. Currently, the Company does not participate in any other activities outside of controlling the Bank. The Bank provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers through its eight banking offices located on the Eastern Shore of Virginia and Maryland, including the counties of Accomack and Northampton, Virginia, and the Salisbury/Wicomico County area in Maryland. The Company’s common stock became publicly traded in August 1997, upon completing its subscription rights and initial public offerings, which included the sale of 431,250 shares of common stock.

Shore Investments, Inc. (“Shore Investments”), a subsidiary of the Bank, engages in financial activities supporting the Bank’s operations. These activities include, but are not limited to, the selling of investment and insurance products. The Bank’s subsidiary is invested in a title insurance agency and an investment company while the Company is invested in a trust company, all of which provide services to banking customers.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, the Bank and Shore Investments. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of real estate owned.

 

48


NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

Advertising

The Company expenses advertising costs as they are incurred.

Investment Securities

Investments in debt securities classified as held-to-maturity are stated at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts using the interest method. Management has a positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity and, accordingly, adjustments are not made for temporary declines in their market value below amortized cost. Investments in debt and equity securities classified as trading, if any, are stated at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses for trading securities are included in the statement of income. The Company had no such securities during the periods reported in the financial statements. All other investment securities with readily determinable fair values are classified as available-for-sale. Unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported, net of tax effect, in other comprehensive income until realized.

Investments in Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, VBA Investment Services, Bankers Title of Hampton Roads LLC, Community Bankers’ Bank and Maryland Financial Bank stock are stated at cost, as these securities are restricted and do not have readily determinable fair values.

Gains and losses on the sale of securities are determined using the specific identification method. Other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of individual held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost, if any, are included in earnings as realized losses.

Loans Receivable

Loans receivable consist of real estate loans secured by first deeds of trust on single-family residences, other residential property, commercial property and land located primarily in an area known as the Eastern Shore of Virginia and Maryland, as well as secured and unsecured consumer and commercial loans.

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off generally are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted for charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan yield using the interest method.

The Bank places loans on nonaccrual status after being delinquent greater than 90 days, or earlier, if the loans have developed inherent problems prior to being 90 days delinquent that indicate payments of principal or interest will not be made in full. Whenever the accrual of interest is stopped, a specific allowance is established through a charge to income for previously accrued but uncollected interest income. Thereafter, interest is recognized only as cash is received until six months after the loan is brought current.

 

49


NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Loans Receivable (Continued)

 

The allowance for loan losses represents an amount management believes is adequate to provide for probable loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management evaluates the allowance for loan losses on a regular basis using a methodology that considers various risk factors in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies . This methodology includes analyzing historical loan losses, existing doubtful accounts, the experience of its lenders, growth by loan category, specific loan risk (i.e. construction loans), economic conditions and loan to value considerations. However, risks of future losses cannot be quantified precisely or attributed to particular loans or classes of loans. Because those risks are influenced by general economic trends as well as conditions affecting individual borrowers, management’s judgment of the allowance is necessarily approximate and imprecise. The allowance is also subject to regulatory examinations and determinations as to adequacy, which may take into account such factors as the methodology used to calculate the allowance and the size of the allowance in comparison to peer banks identified by regulatory agencies. In the opinion of management, the present allowance is adequate to absorb reasonably foreseeable loan losses. Additions to the allowance are reflected in current operations. Charge-offs to the allowance are made when the loan is considered uncollectible or is transferred to real estate acquired in settlement of loans.

A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all principal and interest amounts according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. A performing loan may be considered impaired. The allowance for loan losses related to loans identified as impaired is primarily based on the excess of the loan’s current outstanding principal balance over the estimated fair value of the related collateral. For a loan that is not collateral-dependent, the allowance is recorded at the amount by which the outstanding principal balance exceeds the current best estimate of the future cash flows on the loan discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Bank does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures.

For impaired loans that are on nonaccrual status, cash payments received are generally applied to reduce the outstanding principal balance. However, all or a portion of a cash payment received on a nonaccrual loan may be recognized as interest income to the extent allowed by the loan contract, assuming management expects to fully collect the remaining principal balance on the loan.

Credit Related Financial Instruments

In the ordinary course of business, the Bank has entered into commitments to extend credit, including commitments under home equity lines of credit, overdraft protection arrangements, commercial lines of credit, and standby letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.

Transfers of Financial Assets

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Bank, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that restrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Bank does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

 

50


NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

Real Estate Owned

Real estate acquired through foreclosure is initially recorded at the lower of fair value or the loan balance at date of foreclosure. Subsequently, property that is held for resale is carried at the lower of cost or fair value minus estimated selling costs. Costs relating to the development and improvement of property are capitalized, whereas those relating to holding the property are charged to expense.

Management periodically performs valuations, and an allowance for losses is established by a charge to operations if the carrying value of a property exceeds its fair value minus estimated selling costs.

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using accelerated and straight-line methods over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Estimated useful lives are as follows:

 

Buildings

   25 to 40 years

Furniture and equipment

   5 to 15 years

Computer equipment and software

   3 to 5 years

Automobiles

   3 to 5 years

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes represent the cumulative tax effect from temporary differences in the recognition of taxable or deductible amounts for income tax and financial reporting purposes.

Prior to July 1, 1996, in computing federal income taxes, savings banks that met certain definitional tests and other conditions prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code were allowed, within limitations, to deduct from taxable income an allowance for bad debts based on actual loss experience, a percentage of taxable income before such deduction or an amount based on a percentage of eligible loans. The applicable percentage of taxable income used for the bad debt deduction was 8%. Effective July 1, 1996, the percentage of taxable income method and the percentage of eligible loans method for determining the bad debt deduction are no longer available. At December 31, 2007, the cumulative bad debt reserve, upon which no taxes have been paid on tax returns, was approximately $1.2 million. Of this amount, $783,000 represents that portion of the cumulative bad debt reserve for which financial statement income taxes have not been provided, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes .

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised, converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options, and are determined using the treasury stock method.

 

51


NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

Comprehensive Income

Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.

Segment Reporting

Public business enterprises are required to report information about operating segments in annual financial statements, and selected information about operating segments in financial reports issued to shareholders. Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available, and evaluated regularly by management in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Generally, financial information is required to be reported on the basis that it is used internally for evaluating segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources to segments.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Transactions

SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities , establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial condition and measure those instruments at fair value. The Company did not hold derivatives during the periods reported on in the consolidated financial statements.

On March 13, 2002, the FASB determined that loan commitments related to the acquisition or origination of mortgage loans that will be held for sale must be accounted for as derivative instruments, effective for fiscal quarter beginning after April 20, 2002. Accordingly, the Company adopted such accounting on July 1, 2002. The Company did not hold any mortgage loans for sale during the periods reported on in the consolidated financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include currency, balances due from banks, interest-earning deposits with maturities of ninety days or less and federal funds sold.

The Company is required to maintain reserves with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. The aggregate daily average reserves required for the final reporting period was $25,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, which was satisfied by the Company.

 

52


NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

The Company adopted Statement of Financial Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”), effective January 1, 2002. Accordingly, goodwill is no longer subject to amortization over its estimated useful life, but is subject to an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair value based test. Additionally, under SFAS 142, acquired intangible assets are separately recognized if the benefit of the asset can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, and amortized over their useful life. Branch acquisition transactions were outside the initial scope of SFAS 142 and, accordingly, intangible assets related to such transactions continued to amortize upon the adoption of SFAS 142. However, in October 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB Interpretation No. 9 . This statement amends previous interpretative guidance on the application of the purchase method of accounting to acquisitions of financial institutions, and requires the application of FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations , and FASB No. 142 to branch acquisitions if such transactions meet the definition of a business combination.

Management has evaluated the deposit acquisition that occurred in 2002. The acquisition of the Susquehanna Bank deposits in the Salisbury, Maryland market do not qualify as a business combination and the intangible asset related to this deposit acquisition will continue to be amortized over the estimated useful life of the deposits acquired.

Stock Compensation Plans

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock compensation using the intrinsic value based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees , whereby compensation cost is the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant date (or other measurement date) over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Stock options issued under the Company’s stock option plans prior to January 1, 2006 had no intrinsic value at the grant date, and under Opinion No. 25 no compensation cost was recognized for them. On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment . The standard eliminated the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions under the intrinsic value method and required that such transactions be accounted for using a fair value-based method which results in the recognition of compensation expense in the Company’s statement of income. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company recognized $900 and $40,300 of such expense, respectively.

 

53


NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure – an amendment of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation , was issued by the FASB in December, 2002. SFAS 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results.

In accordance with SFAS 148, the Company provides disclosures as if the fair value-based method of measuring all outstanding stock options was already adopted and recognized in 2005. The following table presents the effect on net income and on basic and diluted net income per share as if the fair value-based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards at December 31, 2005. Since the fair-value based method was adopted in 2006, no such disclosure is necessary for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

 

     Years Ended
December 31, 2005
 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)       

Net income, as reported

   $ 2,675,300  

Deduct:

  

Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

     (116,600 )
        

Pro forma net income

   $ 2,558,700  
        

Earnings per share:

  

Basic - as reported

   $ 1.08  
        

Basic - pro forma

   $ 1.03  
        

Diluted - as reported

   $ 1.06  
        

Diluted - pro forma

   $ 1.01  
        

 

54


NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

     Years Ended December 31,  
     2007     2006     2005  

Dividend yield

   2.10 %   1.90 %   1.90 %

Expected life (years)

   7.0     5.5     5.5  

Expected volatility

   25.00 %   25.00 %   25.00 %

Risk-free interest rate

   5.00 %   4.65 %   4.65 %

Accounting for Long-Lived Assets

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets . The statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. The statement specifies criteria for classifying assets as held for sale. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Guarantees

FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees (“FIN 45”), requires that a liability be recognized, at inception, for the fair value of certain guarantees and for the ongoing obligation, if any, to perform over the term of the guarantee. The recognition provisions of FIN 45 are effective for certain guarantees modified or issued after December 31, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operation or financial condition.

Lease Commitments

The Company enters into lease commitments for the use of certain real estate facilities as considered necessary to conduct its operations. These commitments are often for terms of five years with additional renewal options available and generally require monthly lease payments. These leases qualify as operating leases under applicable accounting guidance and, therefore, the monthly lease payments are expensed as incurred.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications of the prior years’ information have been made to conform to the December 31, 2007 presentation.

 

55


NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

Accounting Changes

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140.” This statement amends Statements No. 133 and 140 by: permitting fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument with an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation; clarifying which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of Statement No. 133; establishing a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; clarifying that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and amending Statement No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. The statement was effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.” This statement amends Statement No. 140 with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. It requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time an obligation is undertaken to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain situations, and requires all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. The statement permits the choice between the “amortization method” and the “fair value measurement method” for the subsequent measurement of the servicing assets or liabilities, and allows for a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to trading securities at initial adoption. The statement also requires separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the statement of financial position, and additional disclosures for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The statement was effective for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2006. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement 109,” which provides guidance on the measurement, recognition, and disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, and disclosure. FIN 48 prescribes that a tax position should only be recognized if it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority. A tax position that meets this threshold is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is more likely than not (greater than 50 percent) realized upon ultimate settlement. The cumulative effect of applying FIN 48 is to be reported as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. FIN 48 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

56


NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Concluded)

 

Accounting Changes (Concluded)

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. While the Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, it does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In addition, the Statement establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. Lastly, SFAS No. 157 requires additional disclosures for each interim and annual period separately for each major category of assets and liabilities. The Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”, which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and also establishes fair presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), Business Combinations , which replaces SFAS 141. This Statement establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired in the business combination, liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree as well as the goodwill acquired in a business combination. SFAS 141(R) also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable the users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combinations. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS 141(R) on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – Amendment of ARB No. 51 , which establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest, and the valuation of retained non-controlling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS 160 also establishes expanded disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interest of the parent’s owners and the interests of the non-controlling owners of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 160 on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

57


NOTE 3 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES

A summary of the amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities is as follows:

 

December 31, 2007    Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
    Estimated
Fair Value

Available-for-sale

          

Debt securities:

          

United States government and agency obligations

   $ 7,958,900    $ 99,700    $ (2,300 )   $ 8,056,300

Tax-exempt municipal bonds

     6,412,700      29,100      (8,500 )     6,433,300

Corporate bonds

     1,000,300      3,600      —         1,003,900

Mortgage-backed securities

     1,056,000      —        (8,700 )     1,047,300
                            

Total debt securities

     16,427,900      132,400      (19,500 )     16,540,800
                            

Marketable equity securities:

          

Common stock

     2,424,600      33,200      (530,100 )     1,927,700

Preferred stock

     1,864,100      —        (107,900 )     1,756,200
                            

Total marketable equity securities

     4,288,700      33,200      (638,000 )     3,683,900
                            
     20,716,600      165,600      (657,500 )     20,224,700
                            

Other investment securities (at cost):

          

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

     2,352,400      —        —         2,352,400

Federal Reserve Bank stock

     124,800      —        —         124,800

Community Bankers’ Bank stock

     63,300      —        —         63,300

Banker’s Title of Hampton Roads stock

     13,300      —        —         13,300

VBA Investment Services stock

     95,800      —        —         95,800

Maryland Financial Bank stock

     20,000      —        —         20,000
                            

Total other investment securities

     2,669,600      —        —         2,669,600
                            
   $ 23,386,200    $ 165,600    $ (657,500 )   $ 22,894,300
                            

 

58


NOTE 3 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)

 

December 31, 2006    Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
    Estimated
Fair

Value

Available-for-sale

          

Debt securities:

          

United States government and agency obligations

   $ 12,942,200    $ 1,200    $ (204,300 )   $ 12,739,100

Tax-exempt municipal bonds

     6,414,400      21,200      (21,700 )     6,413,900

Corporate bonds

     2,003,300      18,600      —         2,021,900

Mortgage-backed securities

     1,262,600      —        (41,300 )     1,221,300
                            

Total debt securities

     22,622,500      41,000      (267,300 )     22,396,200
                            

Marketable equity securities:

          

Common stock

     2,271,700      428,000      (9,800 )     2,689,900

Preferred stock

     2,897,100      13,900      (31,800 )     2,879,200
                            

Total marketable equity securities

     5,168,800      441,900      (41,600 )     5,569,100
                            
     27,791,300      482,900      (308,900 )     27,965,300
                            

Other investment securities:

          

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

     2,075,500      —        —         2,075,500

Federal Reserve Bank stock

     124,800      —        —         124,800

Community Bankers’ Bank stock

     63,300      —        —         63,300

Banker’s Title of Hampton Roads stock

     13,300      —        —         13,300

VBA Investment Services stock

     145,800      —        —         145,800

Maryland Financial Bank stock

     20,000      —        —         20,000
                            
     2,442,700      —        —         2,442,700
                            
   $ 30,234,000    $ 482,900    $ (308,900 )   $ 30,408,000
                            

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at December 31, 2007 by contractual maturity are shown below:

 

     Amortized
Cost
   Fair
Value

Available-for-sale

     

Due in one year or less

   $ 2,000,300    $ 2,002,300

Due after one year through five years

     8,624,800      8,680,500

Due after five years through ten years

     2,975,100      3,036,700

Due after ten years

     2,827,700      2,821,300
             
   $ 16,427,900    $ 16,540,800
             

At December 31, 2007 and 2006, investment securities with a carrying value of approximately $2.03 million and $974,000, respectively, were pledged as collateral for public deposits.

 

59


NOTE 3 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Concluded)

For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, proceeds from the sales of securities available for sale amounted to $831,000, $1.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Gross realized gains amounted to $156,000, $231,000 and $189,000, respectively, while gross realized losses were $83,000, $21,000 and $23,000, respectively. The tax provision applicable to these net realized gains and losses amounted to $25,000, $77,000 and $56,000, respectively.

The following table summarizes the Company’s investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2007.

 

     Less Than 12 Months     12 Months or More     Total  

Description of Securities

   Fair
Value
   Unrealized
Losses
    Fair
Value
   Unrealized
Losses
    Fair
Value
   Unrealized
Losses
 

United States government and agency obligations

   $ —      $ —       $ 1,997,600    $ (2,400 )   $ 1,997,600    $ (2,400 )

Tax-exempt municipal bonds

     —        —         1,705,200      (8,500 )     1,705,200      (8,500 )

Corporate bonds

     —        —         —        —         —        —    

Mortgage-backed securities

     —        —         1,047,400      (8,700 )     1,047,400      (8,700 )

Adjustable Rate Mortgage Fund

     —        —         —        —         —        —    
                                             

Subtotal, debt securities

     —        —         4,750,200      (19,600 )     4,750,200      (19,600 )
                                             

Federal Home Loan Mortgage

               

Corporation common stock

     —        —         —        (530,100 )     —        (530,100 )

Preferred stock

     505,000      (3,600 )     836,500      (28,200 )     1,341,500      (31,800 )

Other equity securities

     90,000      (4,100 )     70,400      (5,700 )     160,400      (9,800 )
                                             

Subtotal, equity securities

     595,000      (7,700 )     906,900      (564,000 )     1,501,900      (571,700 )
                                             

Total temporarily impaired securities

   $ 595,000    $ (7,700 )   $ 5,657,100    $ (583,600 )   $ 6,252,100    $ (591,300 )
                                             

There are a total of thirty-seven securities that have unrealized losses as of December 31, 2007: two United States government and agency securities, three United States agency MBS securities, three municipal securities, twenty-five common stock securities and four preferred stock securities. The debt securities are obligations of entities that are excellent credit risks. The impairment as noted is the result of interest rate market conditions and does not reflect on the ability of the issuers to repay the debt obligations. The losses in the common stock securities reflect recent swings in the equity markets. The impairment is the result of problems in the credit markets that should correct itself over time, resulting in a high probability of full recovery of investment. The preferred stock category represents ownership in three reputable companies whose credit ratings remain strong as measured by Moody’s and S&P. The Company maintains the ability and intent to hold all securities for the foreseeable future.

Other investment securities are accounted for using the cost method and are not included in the evaluation of impairment. However, these investments were reviewed by management and no identified events or changes in circumstances were identified that may have a significant adverse effect on their fair value.

 

60


NOTE 4 - LOANS RECEIVABLE

Loans receivable are summarized below:

 

     December 31,
     2007    2006

Real estate loans:

     

Coventional mortgage:

     

Secured by one-to-four family residences

   $ 88,739,500    $ 80,245,200

Commercial mortgages

     69,448,200      64,698,400

Land

     31,170,100      31,645,000

Short-term construction

     8,967,000      9,160,600

Home equity lines of credit

     13,882,300      14,742,800

Consumer loans

     3,842,000      3,380,800

Commercial loans:

     

Secured

     5,046,900      5,348,200

Unsecured

     4,121,200      4,333,500
             

Total loans

     225,217,200      213,554,500

Less:

     

Loans in process

     3,475,100      2,820,100

Deferred loan fees (costs), net

     156,000      136,400

Allowance for loan losses

     2,698,800      2,872,800
             
   $ 218,887,300    $ 207,725,200
             

The allowance for loan losses is summarized below:

 

     Years Ended December 31,
     2007     2006     2005

Balance at beginning of year

   $ 2,872,800     $ 2,850,700     $ 2,404,500

Provision (provision recovery) charged to expense

     (72,600 )     58,700       303,700

(Charge-offs) recoveries, net

     (101,400 )     (36,600 )     142,500
                      

Balance at end of the year

   $ 2,698,800     $ 2,872,800     $ 2,850,700
                      

 

61


NOTE 4 - LOANS RECEIVABLE (Concluded)

At December 31, 2007, the Bank did not identify any impaired loans as defined by generally accepted accounting principles. At December 31, 2006, the Bank identified $3,000 of loans as impaired as defined by generally accepted accounting principles. However, the Bank did not allocate a valuation allowance for this loan at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2005, the Bank identified $314,000 of loans as impaired as defined by generally accepted accounting principles. Impaired loans at December 2005 had a valuation allowance allocation of $47,000. During late 2007, the Company had one impaired loan of which the collateral was foreclosed on and sold prior to year end. For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the average recorded investment in impaired loans was $37,000, $155,000 and $100,000, respectively, and interest income recognized on impaired loans, all on the cash basis, was approximately $9,000, $5,000 and $15,000, respectively. No additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans. At December 31, 2007, nonaccrual loans were $793,100 and no loans existed that are past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest.

NOTE 5 - PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:

 

     December 31,  
     2007     2006  

Land

   $ 1,138,100     $ 739,500  

Buildings

     6,768,100       6,845,900  

Furniture and fixtures

     2,580,400       2,322,400  

Computer equipment & software

     1,005,500       904,800  

Automobiles

     110,000       145,200  

Construction in process

     173,700       59,300  
                
     11,775,800       11,017,100  

Less - accumulated depreciation

     (4,404,800 )     (3,972,800 )
                
   $ 7,371,000     $ 7,044,300  
                

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 amounted to $626,800, $681,200 and $666,400, respectively.

 

62


NOTE 6 - DEPOSITS

Deposits accounts are summarized below:

 

     December 31,
     2007    2006

Demand deposits:

     

Noninterest-bearing

   $ 27,984,700    $ 25,554,500
             

Interest-bearing:

     

Savings accounts

     17,936,100      19,155,500

Checking accounts

     32,096,400      24,561,300

Money market deposit accounts

     16,910,500      17,108,700
             

Total interest-bearing

     66,943,000      60,825,500
             

Total demand deposits

     94,927,700      86,380,000

Time deposits

     101,636,200      111,722,800
             
   $ 196,563,900    $ 198,102,800
             

The aggregate amount of certificates of deposit with a minimum denomination of $100,000 was approximately $28.1 million and $28.6 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Time deposits outstanding at December 31, 2007 mature as follows:

 

Within one year

   $ 79,154,000

One to two years

     8,054,000

Two to three years

     8,815,000

Three to four years

     2,552,000

Four to five years

     2,512,000

Thereafter

     549,200
      
   $ 101,636,200
      

 

63


NOTE 7 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The estimated fair values of the Bank's financial instruments as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

 

     Carrying
Amount
   Fair
Value
     (in thousands)

December 31, 2007

     

Financial assets

     

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 11,265    $ 11,265

Securities

     22,894      22,894

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses

     218,887      221,517

Accrued interest receivable

     1,119      1,119

Financial liabilities

     

Deposits

     196,564      190,538

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

     41,117      41,340

Accrued interest payable

     646      646

Unrecognized financial instruments

     

Commitments to extend credit

     N/A      N/A

December 31, 2006

     

Financial assets

     

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 9,470    $ 9,470

Securities

     30,408      30,408

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses

     207,725      208,046

Accrued interest receivable

     1,140      1,140

Financial liabilities

     

Deposits

     198,103      187,004

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

     35,233      35,078

Accrued interest payable

     594      594

Unrecognized financial instruments

     

Commitments to extend credit

     N/A      N/A

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value.

 

64


NOTE 7 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Concluded)

Cash and cash equivalents

For cash and cash equivalents, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Securities

Fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities. For restricted securities without readily determinable values, the carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Loan receivables

The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows, using market rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar remaining maturities. This calculation ignores loan fees and certain factors affecting the interest rates charged on various loans, such as the borrower's creditworthiness and compensating balances, and dissimilar types of real estate held as collateral.

Deposit liabilities

The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the balance sheet date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting remaining maturities amounts using market rates for similar replacement funding sources.

Accrued interest receivable and payable

The carrying amounts of accrued interest receivable and payable approximate their fair values.

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

The carrying value of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank due within ninety days from the balance sheet date approximates fair value. For those borrowings that mature beyond ninety days, the fair value of the borrowing is estimated by discounting future cash flows, using the current rates at which similar borrowings would be obtained from the Federal Home Loan Bank with similar remaining maturities.

Commitments to extend credit

The fair value of commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the borrowers. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. Because of the competitive nature of the marketplace, loan fees vary greatly with no fees charged in many cases. Therefore, management has concluded no value should be assigned.

 

65


NOTE 8 - ADVANCES FROM FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK

Borrowings (“advances”) from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) are scheduled to mature as follows:

 

     December 31,
     2007    2006

Within one year

   $ 18,700,000    $ 24,750,000

One to two years

     17,000,000      3,000,000

More than two years

     5,416,700      7,483,300
             
   $ 41,116,700    $ 35,233,300
             

Information regarding FHLB advances is summarized below:

 

     Years Ended December 31,
     2007    2006

Monthly average balance of borrowings outstanding

   $ 33,785,100    $ 33,667,800

Maximum month-end balance of borrowings outstanding

   $ 41,116,700    $ 42,683,300

The weighted average interest rate on advances was 4.94%, 4.92% and 3.59% for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These advances are collateralized by the Bank's investment in FHLB stock, qualifying real estate loans with a principal balance of approximately $105.3 million, and government agency and mortgage-backed securities with a fair market value of approximately $3.0 million held under a specific collateral agreement. The Bank has an available line of credit with the FHLB for up to 25% of Bank assets, or approximately $66.1 million at December 31, 2007. However, the Bank may request an increase in this borrowing capacity from the FHLB. At December 31, 2007 the Bank had sufficient collateral pledged to borrow a total of approximately $87.2 million from the FHLB. The borrowing capacity is subject to certain collateral requirements as stipulated in the FHLB borrowing agreement.

 

66


NOTE 9 - OTHER NONINTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSE

Other noninterest income and expense consists of the following:

 

     Years Ended December 31,
     2007    2006    2005

Other noninterest income

        

Income from real estate held for investment

   $ 5,900    $ 24,100    $ 31,600

Safe deposit box rental

     24,900      20,700      21,200

Increase in BOLI cash surrender value

     158,200      147,100      134,700

Miscellaneous fees and commissions

     83,000      76,700      69,400
                    
   $ 272,000    $ 268,600    $ 256,900
                    

Other noninterest expense

        

Education and seminars

   $ 52,200    $ 65,900    $ 39,200

Personnel costs

     101,000      93,300      77,700

Travel

     46,000      46,900      34,300

Courier cost

     33,100      27,000      26,700

Supervisory fees

     55,200      48,000      30,400

Loan costs

     34,300      43,000      48,300

ATM/VISA check card fees

     152,200      119,900      95,700

Insurance

     38,500      41,500      36,200

Bank service charges

     77,900      72,300      70,900

Deposit account write-offs

     43,600      7,700      26,300

Miscellaneous

     36,300      34,900      39,900
                    
   $ 670,300    $ 600,400    $ 525,600
                    

 

67


NOTE 10 - INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes (benefit) is summarized below:

 

     Years Ended December 31,  
     2007     2006     2005  

Current

      

Federal

   $ 1,152,400     $ 1,413,300     $ 1,378,300  

State

     —         —         2,000  
                        
     1,152,400       1,413,300       1,380,300  
                        

Deferred

      

Federal

     (45,700 )     (257,400 )     (187,500 )

State

     —         —         —    
                        
     (45,700 )     (257,400 )     (187,500 )
                        

Total

      

Federal

     1,106,700       1,155,900       1,190,800  

State

     —         —         2,000  
                        
   $ 1,106,700     $ 1,155,900     $ 1,192,800  
                        

 

     December 31,
     2007    2006

Deferred tax asset

     

Bad debts and other provisions

   $ 951,000    $ 976,000

Unrealized loss on securities available for sale

     168,000      —  

Other

     52,000      39,300
             

Total deferred tax asset

     1,171,000      1,015,300
             

Deferred tax liability

     

FHLB stock

     70,000      70,000

Depreciation

     227,000      285,000

Unrealized gain on securities available for sale

     —        59,000
             

Total deferred tax liability

     297,000      414,000
             

Net deferred tax asset

   $ 874,000    $ 601,300
             

 

68


NOTE 10 - INCOME TAXES (Concluded)

The differences between expected federal and state income tax expense at statutory rates to actual income tax expense are summarized as follows:

 

     Years Ended December 31,  
     2007     2006     2005  

Federal income tax expense - at statutory rate

   $ 1,305,000     $ 1,390,000     $ 1,315,000  

Tax effect of:

      

Tax exempt interest income

     (84,000 )     (53,000 )     (50,000 )

BOLI cash surrender value increase

     (54,000 )     (50,000 )     (46,000 )

Dividends received deduction

     (65,000 )     (58,000 )     (42,000 )

Other, net

     4,700       (73,100 )     15,800  
                        
   $ 1,106,700     $ 1,155,900     $ 1,192,800  
                        

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes , which was effective January 1, 2007. FIN 48 provides a comprehensive model for how the Company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the Company has taken or expects to take on its tax return. The Company does not have any unrecognized tax benefits as defined by FIN 48 and, therefore, there was no effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations as a result of implementing FIN 48.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and the state of Virginia. With few possible exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. or state income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2004.

NOTE 11 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and its banking subsidiary must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and its banking subsidiary to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2007, that the Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

 

69


NOTE 11 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)

 

As of December 31, 2007, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category. The Company and the Bank's actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the table.

 

                           To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
 
                          
                For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
   
     Actual      
(Dollars in Thousands)    Amount    Ratio     Amount    Ratio     Amount    Ratio  

As of December 31, 2007:

               

Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):

               

Consolidated

   $ 29,664    15.60 %   $ 15,216    8.00 %   $ N/A    N/A  

Shore Bank

     25,361    13.57 %     14,954    8.00 %     18,693    10.00 %

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):

               

Consolidated

   $ 27,308    14.36 %   $ 7,608    4.00 %   $ N/A    N/A  

Shore Bank

     23,020    12.31 %     7,477    4.00 %     11,216    6.00 %

Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):

               

Consolidated

   $ 27,308    10.28 %   $ 10,622    4.00 %   $ N/A    N/A  

Shore Bank

     23,020    8.77 %     10,498    4.00 %     13,123    5.00 %

As of December 31, 2006:

               

Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):

               

Consolidated

   $ 28,060    15.09 %   $ 14,879    8.00 %   $ N/A    N/A  

Shore Bank

     23,471    12.97 %     14,473    8.00 %     18,091    10.00 %

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):

               

Consolidated

   $ 25,611    13.77 %   $ 7,440    4.00 %   $ N/A    N/A  

Shore Bank

     21,180    11.71 %     7,236    4.00 %     10,855    6.00 %

Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):

               

Consolidated

   $ 25,611    9.93 %   $ 10,319    4.00 %   $ N/A    N/A  

Shore Bank

     21,180    8.27 %     10,247    4.00 %     12,809    5.00 %

Federal and state banking regulations place certain restrictions on dividends paid and loans or advances made by the Bank to the Company. The total amount of dividends that may be paid at any date is generally limited to the retained earnings (as defined) for the Bank for the current and past two years, and loans or advances are limited to 10 percent of the Bank’s capital stock and surplus on a secured basis. In addition, dividends paid by the Bank to the Company would be prohibited if the effect thereof would cause the Bank’s capital to be reduced below applicable minimum capital requirements.

At December 31, 2007, the Bank’s retained earnings available for the payment of dividends was $4.7 million. Accordingly, $18.8 million of the Company’s equity in the net assets of the Bank was restricted at December 31, 2007.

 

70


NOTE 11 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Concluded)

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.07 per share for the first, second and third quarters and $0.08 per share for the fourth quarter. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.058 per share for the first, second and third quarters and $0.07 per share for the fourth quarter. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.05 per share for the first and second quarters and $0.058 per share for the third and fourth quarters. During August 2006, the Company effected a six-for-five stock split. All 2005 and 2006 dividends per share have been adjusted to reflect the August 2006 stock split. On January 8, 2008, the Company declared a $0.08 per share quarterly cash dividend paid on February 1, 2008 to shareholders of record on January 25, 2008.

During October 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a Dividend Reinvestment Plan (“DRIP Plan”) whereby shareholders may elect to have cash dividends paid by the Company reinvested in its common stock, subject to certain limitations. Shareholders may also make optional cash payments to purchase additional shares of the Company’s common stock. The DRIP Plan document details the plan and was sent to each shareholder during November 2001.

During May 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the repurchase of 125,000 additional shares of common stock on the open market. The Company has not repurchased any shares of common stock under this plan.

NOTE 12 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

401k Profit Sharing Plan

The Company’s 401k Profit Sharing Plan Trust (the “Plan”) provides for retirement, death and disability benefits. An employee becomes eligible for participation in the Plan on the first day of the month following their ninety day anniversary date with the Company. However, an employee must be employed on the last day of the year to be eligible for profit sharing under the Plan.

Employees may elect to defer 2%-15% of their compensation, with the Company making matching contributions equal to 100% of the first 3% of compensation deferred, and 50% of the next 3%. Matching contributions made by the Company under the Plan totaled approximately $120,300, $107,900 and $87,600 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company may also elect to make discretionary contributions to the Plan. Accordingly, $120,000, $120,000 and $106,000 of such contributions were made during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

 

71


NOTE 12 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

 

Stock Option Plans

The Company currently has one stock option plan for employees in effect – the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2001 Plan”). The 1992 Stock Option Plan expired, but certain options deemed earned are still exercisable. The Company’s 2001 Plan is designed to attract and retain qualified personnel in key positions, provide employees with a proprietary interest in the Company as an incentive to contribute to the success of the Company and the Bank and reward employees for outstanding performance and the attainment of targeted goals. The 2001 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options intended to comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“incentive stock options”), as well as nonqualified stock options.

The 2001 Plan, approved by the Company’s shareholders on April 17, 2001, provides up to 388,800 shares of common stock (as adjusted for the December 2003 20% stock dividend and August 2006 six-for-five stock split) for granting restricted stock awards and stock options in the form of incentive stock options and nonstatutory stock options to employees of the Company. The 2001 Plan also provides for the granting of restricted stock awards. The 2001 Plan expires on April 16, 2011.

The 2001 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee formed by the Company’s Board of Directors, each member of which is a “nonemployee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The 2001 Plan is in effect for a period of ten years from the date of adoption by the Board of Directors.

Under the 2001 Plan, the committee determines which employees will be granted options, whether such options will be incentive or nonqualified options, the number of shares subject to each option, whether such options may be exercised by delivering other shares of common stock and when such options become exercisable. In general, the per share exercise price of an incentive stock option shall be at least equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date the option is granted. The per share exercise price of a nonqualified stock option shall be not less than 50% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date the option is granted.

Stock options shall become vested and exercisable in the manner specified by the committee. In general, each stock option or portion thereof shall be exercisable at any time on or after it vests and is exercisable for periods of up to 10 years after its date of grant. Stock options are nontransferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

The committee also determines which employees will be awarded restricted stock and the number of shares to be awarded. The value of the restricted stock is to be at least equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date the stock is granted. No shares of restricted stock have been awarded.

During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company did not grant incentive stock options under the 2001 Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company granted 16,897 incentive stock options under the 2001 Plan at an average exercise price of $16.40. During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company granted 500, 10,880 and 24,217 nonqualified stock options under the 2001 plan at an average exercise price of $13.10, $14.86 and $15.37, respectively.

 

72


NOTE 12 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

Stock Option Plan (continued)

 

The following table represents options outstanding under the Stock Plans:

 

     Years Ended December 31,
     2007    2006     2005
     Options     Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
   Options     Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
    Options     Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price

Outstanding - beginning of year

   137,989     $ 11.26       136,057     $ 10.85     111,479     $ 8.43

Granted

   500       13.10       10,880       14.86     41,114       15.79

Exercised

   (3,600 )     6.30       (8,328 )     (6.74 )   (14,898 )     6.22

Forfeited

   (4,800 )     14.95       (620 )     15.19     (1,638 )     12.61
                                          

Outstanding - end of year

   130,089     $ 11.35    $ 65,400    137,989     $ 11.26     136,057     $ 10.85
                                              

Exercisable - end of year

   128,369     $ 11.35    $ 70,500    136,529     $ 11.26     134,857     $ 10.84
                                              

Weighted average fair value of options granted

     $ 3.82         $ 3.89       $ 4.30
                              

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $27,300, $66,100 and $100,800, respectively.

 

Nonvested Shares

   Number of
Options
    Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

Nonvested at January 1, 2007

   1,460     $ 4.30

Granted

   500       3.82

Vested

   (240 )     3.90

Forfeited

   —         —  
            

Nonvested at December 31, 2007

   1,720     $ 3.87
            

As of December 31, 2007, there was $6,700 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period 4.17 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $900, $40,900 and $172,500 respectively.

Total compensation cost of share-based payment arrangements recognized in income during 2007 was $900. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for share-based compensation arrangements was $300 for 2007.

 

73


NOTE 12 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Concluded)

Stock Option Plan (concluded)

Cash received from option exercises under share-based payment arrangements for 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $22,700, $56,200 and $47,000, respectively. Tax deductions from option exercises of share-based arrangements received during 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $5,700, $10,900 and $9,300, respectively. During 2006 and 2007, no outstanding shares were exchanged towards the exercise of stock options, while 1,492 outstanding shares were exchanged towards the exercise of stock options during 2005.

Other information pertaining to options outstanding at December 31, 2007 is as follows:

 

     Options Outstanding    Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices    Number
Outstanding
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Number
Exercisable
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$5.56 - $8.90

   57,609    3.98    $ 7.06    57,609    $ 7.06

$13.50 - $16.40

   72,481    5.07    $ 14.87    70,761    $ 14.87
                  

Outstanding at end of year

   130,089          128,369   
                  

NOTE 13 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In the normal course of business, the Bank makes loans to and receives deposits from directors, officers and other related parties. Loans to employees are made on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other borrowers, except that the interest rate is reduced by a stated amount for primary residence loans, as long as such person remains employed by the Bank. At December 31, 2007, total deposit balances outstanding of related parties were $1.0 million. A summary of related party loan activity for the periods indicated is as follows:

 

Balance, December 31, 2006

   $ 4,449,400  

Originations

     401,100  

Repayments

     (1,634,600 )
        

Balance, December 31, 2007

   $ 3,215,900  
        

 

74


NOTE 13 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Concluded)

The Bank has a lease agreement with the Bank’s former Chairman of the Board of Directors to lease a lot at Four Corners Plaza, Onley, Virginia, for $2,000 per month expiring in 2009 with two five-year renewals. Each renewal will be at the option of the Bank and the leases will be based on the previous lease rate, after being adjusted for changes in the consumer price index. Shore Investments Inc. has a lease agreement with a partnership whereby the Company’s Chairman of the Board is the majority partner. The lease is for property located in Accomac, Virginia at $1,000 per month expiring in 2010 with two five-year renewal options available if the Bank chooses to exercise them. The Bank has a lease agreement with a director for two billboard signs at $400 per month each that expires in August 2011.

All related party transactions were consummated in terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s length transactions.

NOTE 14 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES AND OTHER RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Minimum future lease payments for these operating leases are as follows:

 

Years Ending December 31,

  

2008

   $ 134,700

2009

     84,000

2010

     48,000

2011

     38,000

2012

     24,300
      
   $ 329,000
      

Rental expense under operating leases was $104,200, $53,400 and $30,600 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The Company is a party to credit related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. The Company follows the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

 

75


NOTE 14 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES AND OTHER RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Concluded)

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The Bank evaluates each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the counter party. Collateral held varies but may include single-family residences, other residential property, commercial property and land. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Bank had outstanding commitments to originate loans, including outstanding construction loan commitments, with variable interest rates of approximately $11.4 million and $8.4 million, respectively. In addition, unused lines of credit, primarily at variable rates, amounted to approximately $37.1 million and $36.2 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Standby letters of credit at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $1.8 million and $984,000, respectively. The distribution of commitments to extend credit approximates the distribution of loans outstanding.

In the normal course of business, the Bank has entered into employment agreements with some of its key executives. The Company may terminate the employment agreements with proper notice as specified in the agreements. Termination without cause (as defined in the agreement) entitles the executive to base salary and benefits for a specified period of time from the date of termination, depending on the agreement.

The Bank has an agreement with a service company whereby the latter furnishes data processing services to the Bank. The contract was last renewed during 2005 for an additional 60 months that is similar to the previous agreement and to those entered into by other entities in the financial institution industry. The costs represent normal operating costs to the Bank.

Various legal claims also arise from time to time in the normal course of business that, in the opinion of management, will have no material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

76


NOTE 15 - EARNINGS PER SHARE RECONCILIATION

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations.

 

     Years Ended December 31,
     2007    2006    2005

Net income (numerator, basic and diluted)

   $ 2,730,600    $ 2,933,100    $ 2,675,300

Weighted average shares outstanding (denominator)

     2,499,800      2,492,100      2,485,100
                    

Earnings per common share - basic

   $ 1.09    $ 1.18    $ 1.08
                    

Effect of dilutive securities:

        

Weighted average shares outstanding

     2,499,800      2,492,100      2,485,100

Effect of stock options

     19,400      30,500      36,200
                    

Diluted average shares outstanding (denominator)

     2,519,200      2,522,600      2,521,300
                    

Earnings per common share - assuming dilution

   $ 1.08    $ 1.16    $ 1.06
                    

NOTE 16 - PARENT COMPANY

Since its inception, the Company’s business activities have been limited to investment activities related to the Bank and its excess cash. Dividends and management fees from the Bank and investment income represent the only sources of funds for the Company. Certain restrictions exist that limit the amount of dividends the Bank may declare without obtaining regulatory approval. At December 31, 2007, the Bank had approximately $4.7 million available to declare in dividends under existing regulatory guidelines.

The Company’s primary costs consist of its employees’ compensation expense, board of director’s expenses, public reporting requirements and annual fees associated with being a public company. During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Bank paid the Company management fees of $564,000, $480,000 and $431,000, respectively, for its proportion of operating costs.

 

77


NOTE 16 - PARENT COMPANY (Continued)

 

The Company’s condensed balance sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related condensed statements of income and cash flows for years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are provided below:

Condensed Balance Sheets

 

     December 31,
     2007    2006

Assets

     

Cash and due from banks

   $ 1,240,000    $ 682,000

Securities available-for-sale

     3,501,000      5,224,000

Investment in Shore Bank

     23,471,000      21,465,000

Other assets

     644,000      169,000
             

Total assets

   $ 28,856,000    $ 27,540,000
             

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

     

Liabilities

   $ 1,136,000    $ 1,414,000

Stockholders’ equity

     27,720,000      26,126,000
             

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 28,856,000    $ 27,540,000
             

Condensed Statements of Income

 

     Years Ended December 31,
     2007    2006    2005

Income

        

Dividends from Shore Bank

   $ 700,000    $ 1,000,000    $ 500,000

Management Fees from Shore Bank

     564,000      480,000      431,000

Investment income

     279,000      239,000      171,000

Gain on sales of securities

     125,000      246,000      185,000
                    

Total income

     1,668,000      1,965,000      1,287,000
                    

Expenses

        

Compensation and benefits

     456,000      441,000      412,000

Directors’ fees

     98,000      81,000      93,000

Accounting and professional fees

     140,000      147,000      97,000

Other

     133,000      137,000      73,000
                    

Total expenses

     827,000      806,000      675,000
                    

Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary

     841,000      1,159,000      612,000

Income tax expense

     —        —        —  
                    

Income before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary

     841,000      1,159,000      612,000

Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary (1)

     1,890,000      1,774,000      2,063,000
                    

Net income

   $ 2,731,000    $ 2,933,000    $ 2,675,000
                    

 

(1) Amount in parentheses represents the excess of dividends declared over net income of subsidiary.

 

78


NOTE 16 - PARENT COMPANY (Concluded)

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

 

       Years Ended December 31,  
     2007     2006     2005  

Operating Activities

      

Net income

   $ 2,731,000     $ 2,933,000     $ 2,675,000  

Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary

     (1,890,000 )     (1,774,000 )     (2,063,000 )

Other non-cash transactions

     (5,000 )     14,000       —    

Gain on sale of securities

     (125,000 )     (246,000 )     (185,000 )

Tax benefit from stock options

     6,000       11,000       9,000  

Compensation expense for stock options granted

     —         40,000       —    

Change in other assets

     (50,000 )     (30,000 )     (9,000 )

Change in other liabilities

     3,000       18,000       9,000  
                        

Cash flows from operating activities

     670,000       966,000       436,000  
                        

Investing Activities

      

Proceeds from sale and calls of available-for-sale securities

     1,836,000       593,000       855,000  

Purchase of available-for-sale securities

     (821,000 )     (1,643,000 )     (877,000 )

Purchase of premises and equipment

     (425,000 )     —         —    

Sale of premises and equipment

     —         —         —    

Other investing activities

     —         —         —    
                        

Cash flows from investing activities

     590,000       (1,050,000 )     (22,000 )
                        

Financing Activities

      

Proceeds from exercise of common stock options

     23,000       56,000       72,000  

Proceeds from borrowings

     —         1,000,000       —    

Payment of dividends on common stock

     (725,000 )     (610,000 )     (538,000 )
                        

Cash flows from financing activities

     (702,000 )     446,000       (466,000 )
                        

Change in cash and cash equivalents

     558,000       362,000       (52,000 )

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

     682,000       320,000       372,000  
                        

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

   $ 1,240,000     $ 682,000     $ 320,000  
                        

 

79


NOTE 17 - QUARTERLY CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME – UNAUDITED

Quarterly Condensed Statements of Income - Unaudited

 

     2007 Quarters Ended
     March 31    June 30    September 30    December 31

Total interest and dividend income

   $ 3,926,700    $ 4,049,600    $ 4,164,000    $ 4,116,400

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

     2,067,300      2,195,800      2,277,900      2,336,000

Noninterest income

     829,300      811,700      811,900      799,600

Noninterest expense

     1,973,300      2,244,900      2,060,500      2,013,500

Income before income taxes

     923,300      762,600      1,029,300      1,122,100

Net income

     637,100      574,300      730,400      788,800

Earnings per common share - diluted

     0.25      0.23      0.29      0.31

Dividends per common share

     0.070      0.070      0.070      0.070
                           

 

     2006 Quarters Ended
     March 31    June 30    September 30    December 31

Total interest and dividend income

   $ 3,495,800    $ 3,774,500    $ 3,852,100    $ 3,990,100

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

     2,102,500      2,093,900      2,045,400      2,194,500

Noninterest income

     795,400      842,200      838,500      915,800

Noninterest expense

     1,890,700      1,869,100      1,911,600      2,067,800

Income before income taxes

     1,007,200      1,067,000      972,300      1,042,500

Net income

     695,000      736,200      670,900      831,000

Earnings per common share - diluted

     0.27      0.29      0.27      0.33

Dividends per common share

     0.058      0.058      0.058      0.070
                           

NOTE 18 - SEGMENT INFORMATION

Management determines the Company’s operating segments and evaluates their performance by the markets in which the Bank operates. Currently, the Bank operates in two different geographical markets: Virginia and Maryland. Generally, each market possesses a different customer base and occasionally requires that management approach product pricing and promotion in different manners. However, products offered in each market are similar. Additionally, the Maryland market represents a newer market to the Bank than does the Virginia market.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates performance based on net interest income from operations and asset growth within the segments.

 

80


NOTE 18 - SEGMENT INFORMATION (Concluded)

Since the Company derives a significant portion of its revenues from interest income and interest expense is the most significant expense, the segments are reported below using net interest income for the periods indicated. The “Other” column primarily represents the Company’s investment activities resulting from excess cash available within the individual segments. The “Elimination” column represents intersegment activities and reconciles the segments to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

(In thousands)    Virginia    Maryland    Other     Elimination of
Intersegment
Transactions
    Total

Net Interest Income:

            

Year ended December 31, 2007

   $ 6,575    $ 1,824    $ (514 )   $ 919     $ 8,804

Year ended December 31, 2006

   $ 6,400    $ 1,752    $ (377 )   $ 720     $ 8,495

Year ended December 31, 2005

   $ 6,174    $ 1,690    $ 590     $ (17 )   $ 8,437

Assets:

            

December 31, 2007

   $ 206,469    $ 53,949    $ 38,745     $ (32,496 )   $ 266,667

December 31, 2006

   $ 198,692    $ 49,441    $ 43,531     $ (30,988 )   $ 260,676

NOTE 19 - BRANCH DEPOSIT ACQUISITION

On December 13, 2002, the Bank acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of the Salisbury, Maryland branch of Susquehanna Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Susquehanna Bankshares Inc. The approximate fair value of the net assets acquired and deposit liabilities assumed amounted to $50,000 and $17.5 million, respectively. The Bank realized proceeds of approximately $16.8 million from the transaction, net of a deposit premium intangible of $620,000. The Bank is amortizing this intangible over ten years. During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Bank realized amortization expense of $62,000, $62,000 and $62,000 respectively, on this asset and the accumulated amortization for the periods then ended was $310,000, $248,000 and $186,000, respectively.

NOTE 20 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Total comprehensive income consists of the following for the years indicated:

 

     Years Ended December 31,  
     2007     2006    2005  

Net income

   $ 2,730,600     $ 2,933,100    $ 2,675,300  

Other comprehensive income (loss)

     (439,800 )     68,200      (539,400 )
                       

Total comprehensive income

   $ 2,290,800     $ 3,001,300    $ 2,135,900  
                       

 

81


NOTE 20 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Concluded)

The components of other comprehensive income are as follows for the years indicated:

 

     Years Ended December 31,  
     2007     2006     2005  

Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities:

      

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period

   $ (591,600 )   $ 316,000     $ (674,600 )

Less: reclassification adjustment for gain included in income

     (74,500 )     (210,000 )     (166,400 )
                        

Total other comprehensive gain (loss) before tax effect

     (666,100 )     106,000       (841,000 )

Tax benefit (expense)

     226,300       (37,800 )     301,600  
                        

Net unrealized gain (loss)

   $ (439,800 )   $ 68,200     $ (539,400 )
                        

NOTE 21 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On January 8, 2008, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. (“HRB”). The Merger Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions of HRB’s acquisition of the Company through the merger of the Company with and into HRB (the “Merger”). Shore Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of HRB in the Merger and will operate separately from the Bank of Hampton Roads, a wholly-owned subsidiary of HRB. Scott C. Harvard will continue to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of Shore Bank. The headquarters of the surviving entity, Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., will be the current headquarters of HRB and its Board of Directors will be increased, as specified in the Merger Agreement, to include three new members who currently serve as directors of the Company.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, HRB will acquire all of the outstanding shares of the Company. The shareholders of the Company will receive, for each share of the Company common stock that they own immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger, either $22 per share in cash or 1.8 shares of common stock of HRB (the “Exchange Ratio”). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, shareholders of the Company will have the opportunity to elect to receive cash, shares of common stock of HRB, or a combination of both subject to the allocation and proration procedures set forth in the Merger Agreement. The allocation and proration procedures are intended to ensure that, in the aggregate, no less than 25% and no more than 45% of the total merger consideration will be cash and the remainder will be common stock of HRB. However, HRB has reserved the right to increase the cash portion of the consideration up to 50% of the total merger consideration if the shareholders of the Company in the aggregate elect to receive less than 55% of the total consideration in common stock of HRB.

 

82


NOTE 21 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT (Concluded)

In addition, at the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding option to purchase shares of the Company common stock under any of the Company’s stock plans shall vest pursuant to its terms and shall be converted into an option to acquire the number of shares of HRB common stock equal to the number of shares of common stock underlying the option multiplied by the Exchange Ratio. The exercise price of each option will be adjusted accordingly.

Consummation of the Merger is subject to a number of customary conditions including the approval of the Merger by the shareholders of each of the Company and HRB and the receipt of all required regulatory approvals. The Merger is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2008. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement either party may terminate the Merger Agreement in the event the Merger is not consummated by September 30, 2008. In addition, the Company may terminate the Merger Agreement in the event the Average Price of HRB common stock (as defined in the Merger Agreement) is less than $9.50 per share and HRB may terminate the Merger Agreement in the event such average price is greater than $14.94 per share. The termination of the Merger Agreement will, in certain circumstances, obligate the Company to pay HRB a termination fee of $1.0 million to $2.4 million depending on the triggering event and HRB to pay the Company a termination fee of $1.0 million.

On January 8, 2008, the Company declared a $0.08 per share quarterly cash dividend paid on February 1, 2008 to shareholders of record on January 25, 2008.

 

83


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors

Shore Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Shore Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. Shore Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries’ management is responsibility for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Shore Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

LOGO

Norfolk, Virginia

February 27, 2008

 

84


Item 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

Item 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the year. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective. There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

Disclosure controls and procedures are our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

85


MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL

CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management regularly monitors its internal control over financial reporting and takes appropriate action to correct any deficiencies that may be identified.

Management assessed the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. This assessment was based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

 

/s/ Scott C. Harvard

Scott C. Harvard
President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Steven M. Belote

Steven M. Belote

Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President

March 10, 2008

 

86


PART III

Item 10 .

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERANCE

The table below presents information concerning each director of the Company.

 

Name (Age)

  

Principal Occupation During Past Five Years (1)

Terrell E. Boothe (64)

Independent Director

   Retired. Director since 1985.

The Honorable D. Page Elmore (68)

Independent Director

   Representative, Maryland House of Delegates. Director since 1995.

Dr. Lloyd J. Kellam, III (53)

Independent Director

   Physician, Eastern Shore Physicians and Surgeons, Nassawadox, Virginia. Director since 1992.

Henry P. Custis, Jr. (62)

Independent Director

   Chairman of the Board of the Company and the Bank; Partner, Custis, Lewis & Dix, a law firm located in Accomac, Virginia. Director since 1987.

L. Dixon Leatherbury (58)

Independent Director

   President and General Manager, Leatherbury Equipment Co., Cheriton, Virginia; President, Wakefield Equipment Co., Wakefield, Virginia. Director since 1981.

Scott C. Harvard (53)

   President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank. Director since 1985.

Richard F. Hall, III (54)

Independent Director

   Owner, Loblolly Farms, Accomac, Virginia; Owner, Seaside Produce, Accomac, Virginia. Director since 1997.

 

(1) Includes service as a director of the Bank.

 

87


The table below presents information concerning each executive officer of the Company.

 

Name (Age)

  

Principal Occupation During Past Five Years (1)

Scott C. Harvard (53)

   President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank.

Steven M. Belote (42)

   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Bank.

J. Anderson Duer, Jr. (60)

   Senior Vice President/Lending of the Bank.

Brenda L. Payne (51)

   Senior Vice President of the Company; Senior Vice President/Operations and Risk Management of the Bank.

 

(1) Includes service as an officer of the Bank.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, directors and executive officers of the Company are required to file reports with the SEC indicating their holdings of and transactions in the Company’s equity securities. To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, insiders of the Company complied with all filing requirements during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

Nomination Procedures

During 2007, the Company did not have a nominating committee. The Company’s independent directors serve in that capacity as provided for in the Company’s bylaws. The Board of Directors does not believe that it is necessary to have a nominating committee because it believes that the functions of a nominating committee can be adequately performed by its independent members. In their capacity as the nominating committee, the independent members of the Board of Directors will accept for consideration shareholders’ nominations for directors if made in writing in accordance with the Company’s bylaws. The Company does not have a charter with respect to its director nominations process.

The Company’s bylaws state that subject to the rights of holders of any class or series of stock having a preference over the common stock as to dividends or upon liquidation, nominations for the election of directors shall be made by the Board of Directors or a committee appointed by the Board of Directors or by any shareholder entitled to vote in the election of directors generally. However, any shareholder entitled to vote in the election of directors generally may nominate one or more persons for election as

 

88


directors at a meeting only if written notice of such shareholder’s intent to make such nomination or nominations has been given, either by personal delivery or by United States mail, postage prepaid, to the Secretary of the Company not later than (i) with respect to an election to be held at an annual meeting of shareholders, ninety (90) days in advance of such meeting, and (ii) with respect to an election to be held at a special meeting of shareholders for the election of directors, the close of business on the seventh day following the date on which notice of such meeting is first given to shareholders. Each notice shall set forth: (a) the name and address of the shareholder who intends to make the nomination and of the person or persons to be nominated; (b) a representation that the shareholder is a holder of record of stock of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice; (c) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the shareholder and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the shareholder; (d) such other information regarding each nominee proposed by such shareholder as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the SEC, had the nominee been nominated, or intended to be nominated, by the Board of Directors; and (e) the consent of each nominee to serve as a director of the Company if so elected. The chairman of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure.

Qualifications for consideration as a director nominee may vary according to the particular areas of expertise that may be desired in order to complement the qualifications that already exist among the Board. Among the factors that the directors consider when evaluating proposed nominees are their independence, financial literacy, business experience, character, judgment and strategic vision. Other considerations would be their knowledge of issues affecting the business, their leadership experience and their time available for meetings and consultation on Company matters. The independent directors seek a diverse group of candidates who possess the background skills and expertise to make a significant contribution to the Board, the Company and its shareholders.

Corporate Governance

The Company has a Code of Professional Conduct for Finance Executives that is applicable to all directors and senior executive officers, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer (who is also the principal accounting officer). The Code of Professional Conduct for Finance Executives is available on the Company’s website under Shore Financial Corporation/Corporate Governance ( www.shorebank.com ). The Company intends to post amendments to or waivers, if any, from its Code of Professional Conduct for Finance Executives at this location on its website.

Corporate Governance documents located on the Company’s website include the following:

 

   

Audit Committee Charter

 

   

Code of Conduct for Employees and Directors

 

   

Code of Ethical Conduct for Financial Executives

 

   

Corporate Governance Committee Charter

 

   

Whistleblower Policy

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is comprised of L. Dixon Leatherbury (Chairman), Lloyd J. Kellam, III and Terrell E. Boothe. Mr. Leatherbury has been designated by the Board of Directors as the “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules. The committee has the sole authority and direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related services. The accounting firm engaged by the committee must report directly to the committee. The committee also reviews the reports of examination by the

 

89


regulatory agencies, the independent accountants and the internal auditor, and issues its report to the full Board. A copy of the committee’s charter is located on the Company’s website ( www.shorebank.com ). The Audit Committee met four times during 2007.

Item 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Report of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is responsible for discharging the responsibilities of the Board with respect to the compensation of executive officers. The Compensation Committee sets the performance goals and objectives for the chief executive officer and the other executive officers, evaluates their performance with respect to those goals and sets their compensation based upon their evaluation. In evaluating executive compensation, the Compensation Committee may review salary surveys, retain the services of compensation consultants and consider recommendations from the chief executive officer with respect to goals and compensation of the other executive officers. The Compensation Committee assesses the information it receives based on its judgment. The committee also reviews director compensation and administers the Company’s stock incentive plan. All decisions with respect to executive and director compensation and the stock incentive plan are approved by the Compensation Committee and recommended to the full Board of Directors.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 with management. In reliance on these reviews and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, that the CD&A be included in this report for filing with the SEC.

By the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

Terrell E. Boothe, Chairman

Henry P. Custis, Jr.

Richard F. Hall, III

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Philosophy

Total compensation is intended to reward performance, retain excellent employees, keep employees focused on the goals of the Company and be competitive in the marketplace. Executive compensation is designed to:

 

   

Reward executives for the enhancement of shareholder value.

 

   

Support an environment that rewards performance with respect to Company goals.

 

   

Attract and retain key executives critical to the long term success of the Company.

 

   

Integrate compensation programs with the short and long term strategic plans of the Company.

 

   

Align the interests of the executives with the long term interests of the shareholders.

 

90


The compensation programs of the Company for its executive officers are generally administered at the direction of the Compensation Committee and reviewed annually.

Compensation Overview

Elements of compensation for the executive officers include: base salary, a cash bonus incentive compensation plan, stock incentive awards, 401(k) plan, health, disability, life insurance and perquisites. The Compensation Committee generally determines base salaries for our executives during February of each year with any changes being effective in March of that same year. During this time, the committee also approves and adopts the new Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (“EICP”) for the year and typically considers stock awards to the executive officers and other eligible employees.

In determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee reviews all elements of each executive officer’s total compensation and considers both objective and subjective criteria. With respect to the objective portion of the performance evaluation, the committee specifically considers certain financial performance measures of the Company which may include, but are not limited to, net income and return on equity. Additionally, the Compensation Committee reviews the results of the Virginia Bankers Association’s annual compensation survey, comparing executive compensation with other similarly-sized banking companies across the Commonwealth of Virginia, the compensation of other executives from comparable public banking companies available through public filings, the performance of the Company’s stock and the shareholders’ return. As to the subjective component, the Compensation Committee considers the executive’s level of responsibility and performance and the individual’s contribution in achieving the Company’s long-term mission. Additionally, the Compensation Committee considers input from the President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) with respect to executive officers that report to him and makes appropriate recommendations to the Board of Directors. In determining the President and CEO’s compensation, the committee uses the same objective and subjective measures previously discussed and their subjective assessment of the President and CEO’s contributions to the overall success of the Company.

During 2007, the only executive officers of the Company who earned annual compensation in excess of $100,000 were Scott C. Harvard, President and CEO, J. Anderson Duer, Jr., Senior Vice President/Lending (Bank) and Steven M. Belote, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (the “named executive officers”). The following table provides information on the total compensation paid or accrued during the years indicated below to the named executive officers. The Company did not issue any stock awards during the year presented and the Company does not have a pension plan or a deferred compensation plan for its executive officers. Consequently, these items are eliminated from the table.

 

91


Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and Principal Position

        Annual Compensation    Option
Awards
   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation (1)
   All Other
Compensation (2)
   Total
Compensation
   Year    Salary    Bonus            

Scott C. Harvard
President and Chief Executive Officer

   2007

2006

   $

$

171,700

167,500

   $

$

 -0-

-0-

   $

$

 -0-

-0-

   $

$

 -0-

56,950

   $

$

31,450

31,893

   $

$

203,150

256,343

J. Anderson Duer, Jr.
Senior Vice President/Lending

   2007

2006

   $

$

100,500

98,000

   $

$

-0-

-0-

   $

$

-0-

-0-

   $

$

-0-

5,292

   $

$

9,115

9,816

   $

$

109,615

113,108

Steven M. Belote
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

   2007

2006

   $

$

107,300

104,000

   $

$

-0-

-0-

   $

$

-0-

-0-

   $

$

2,700

5,616

   $

$

9,210

9,611

   $

$

119,210

119,227

 

(1) Consists of cash amounts earned under the Company’s Executive Incentive Compensation Plan.
(2) Amounts shown include: (i) amounts accrued on behalf of each officer under the Company’s 401(k) Plan ($15,900 for Mr. Harvard); and (ii) the dollar value of life insurance premiums paid on behalf of each officer ($15,300 for Mr. Harvard).

Base Salary

The Compensation Committee determines the base salary of executive officers based on what it considers necessary or appropriate to attract the level of competence needed for the position. The committee reviews base salary levels annually, focusing on individual performance from prior years, current industry conditions and current market considerations to ensure that base salary levels for the Company’s executive officers are competitive within a range that the committee considers to be reasonable and necessary. The committee also reviews the Virginia Bankers Association’s Annual Salary Survey and the compensation of other executives from comparable public banking companies available through public filings in determining the base salaries for the Company’s executive officers.

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

The Company provides incentive compensation to its executive officers in the form of annual cash bonuses relating to shorter term financial and operational achievements during the year through the Company’s EICP. It is the committee’s general philosophy that management be rewarded for their performance as a team and, when considered appropriate, individually in the attainment of these goals. Accordingly, the EICP is designed to focus management on the Company’s overall corporate goals as well as various individual goals that the executive is in a position to impact directly. Although an executive officer may be eligible to receive an award under the plan, the granting of the awards to any individual or the officers as a group is entirely at the discretion of the committee.

 

92


During the year ended December 31, 2007, the committee designed the EICP around the Company achieving its overall corporate financial and operational goals. The committee measured three financial goals in 2007 and weighted their impact with respect to the bonus awards based on what the committee considered commensurate with the Company’s goals. These goals consisted of certain targets regarding net income, return on equity and individual goals for each officer that drove the Company’s overall performance. Each executive had the opportunity to earn payout percentages ranging from 20% to 60% of base compensation for the President and CEO and from 10% to 30% of base compensation for the other named executive officers.

Long Term Incentive Program - Stock Incentive Plan

The Company also provides long term incentive compensation to its executive officers and key employees under its 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2001 plan”). The 2001 plan provides for incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards. The Compensation Committee administers the 2001 plan and determines on what basis the options and shares are to be awarded. The committee’s philosophy on the long term incentive awards program is that it should:

 

   

Be designed to align the interest of executives with the long term interest of the shareholders.

 

   

Reward long term performance.

 

   

Help retain executives through business plan cycles where short term compensation may be reduced due to longer term strategic goals.

Stock Incentive Plan

The Company currently has one stock incentive plan for employees in effect – the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. The 1992 Stock Option Plan has expired, but certain options deemed earned are still exercisable. The 2001 plan is designed to attract and retain qualified personnel in key positions, provide employees with a proprietary interest in the Company as an incentive to contribute to the success of the Company and reward employees for outstanding performance and the attainment of targeted goals. The 2001 plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options intended to comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“incentive stock options”), as well as non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards. The 2001 plan is administered by the Compensation Committee, each member of which is a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. Unless sooner terminated, the 2001 plan is in effect for a period of ten years from the date of adoption by the Board of Directors.

Under the 2001 plan, the committee determines which executive officers will be granted options, whether such options will be incentive or non-qualified options, the number of shares subject to each option, whether such options may be exercised by delivering other shares of common stock and when such options become exercisable. In general, the per share exercise price of a stock option must be at least equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date the option is granted.

Stock options shall become vested and exercisable in the manner specified by the committee. In general, each stock option or portion thereof shall be exercisable at any time on or after it vests. Stock options are nontransferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. Non-qualified stock options may be transferred to immediate family members or a family trust.

The committee also determines which executive officers will be awarded restricted stock and the number of shares to be awarded. The compensation value the committee places on the restricted stock at the time of an award is at least equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the stock award. No shares of restricted stock have been awarded under the 2001 plan.

 

93


Stock Option Awards

The Compensation Committee typically determines stock option awards for its executive officers at the same time it is considering all executive performance and compensation. However, the committee may consider these grants at other times during the year if they consider it necessary. When the Compensation Committee decides to grant stock options they generally award them to all employees, including executive officers, on the same date as determined by the committee.

During 2007, the Company did not grant stock options to its named executive officers. Consequently, the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table has not been presented. The following table provides information concerning stock options outstanding to the named executive officers at December 31, 2007. The Company did not have any outstanding restricted stock awards at December 31, 2007 and, therefore, did not include items related to stock awards in the table below.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End

 

     Option Awards

Name

   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
   Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Unearned
Options
   Option
Exercise
Price per
Share (1)
   Option
Expiration Date

Scott C. Harvard

   11,520

11,520

11,241

7,406

6,097

13,657

   -0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

   -0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

   $

 

 

 

 

 

5.56

6.68

8.89

13.50

16.40

14.57

   5/31/2011

3/01/2012

3/01/2013

3/01/2014

3/01/2015

4/12/2015

J. Anderson Duer, Jr.

   2,880

1,440

1,440

2,400

2,400

   -0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

   -0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

   $

 

 

 

 

5.56

6.68

8.89

13.50

16.40

   5/31/2011

3/01/2012

3/01/2013

3/01/2014

3/01/2015

Steven M. Belote

   2,880

2,880

2,880

3,600

3,600

   -0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

   -0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

-0-

   $

 

 

 

 

5.56

6.68

8.89

13.50

16.40

   5/31/2011

3/01/2012

3/01/2013

3/01/2014

3/01/2015

 

(1) The exercise price is based on the market value of a share of common stock at the time the option was granted.

 

94


Options Exercised and Stock Vested

The following table provides information concerning stock options exercised or vested to the named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2007.

2007 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 

       Option Awards    Stock Awards

Name

   Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
   Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
   Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
   Value Realized
on Vesting
($)

Scott C. Harvard

   -0-      -0-    -0-    -0-

J. Anderson Duer, Jr.

   1,440    $ 10,600    -0-    -0-

Steven M. Belote

   -0-      -0-    -0-    -0-

General Benefits

The Company provides a range of employee benefits that cover life, health and disability insurance, vacation and personal leave, as well as 401(k) retirement and other plans. Management reviews employee benefits annually to determine their effectiveness in providing total compensation packages that are competitive in the marketplace. Management will recommend changes to the Compensation Committee as deemed necessary and the committee will make changes as considered appropriate based on its underlying benefit philosophy. The committee’s philosophy regarding the Company’s benefits is that they should:

 

   

Provide protection to employees so that the employees are not distracted and can focus on work.

 

   

Match competitive forms of benefits in the market.

 

   

Encourage retention of productive employees while avoiding entitlements.

 

   

Provide a vehicle to encourage retirement planning for employees.

401(k) Profit Sharing Plan

The Company maintains a 401(k) profit sharing plan (the “401(k) plan”). The 401(k) plan is designed to promote the future economic welfare of the Company’s employees and to encourage employee savings. Employee deferrals of salary and employer contributions made under the 401(k) plan, together with the income thereon, are accumulated in individual accounts maintained in trust on behalf of the employee participants and are made available to the employee participants upon retirement and under certain other circumstances as provided in the 401(k) plan. Employee deferrals of salary and employer contributions made under the 401(k) plan are made on a tax-deferred basis.

A full-time employee of the Company becomes eligible to participate in the 401(k) plan on their three month anniversary date of employment. Participants may elect to defer amounts between 2-15% of their annual compensation to the 401(k) plan, subject to certain limits imposed by law. The Company makes matching contributions equal to 100% of the first 3% of compensation deferred and 50% of the next 3%. The Company may also make discretionary profit sharing contributions, allocated to eligible employees on the basis of relative compensation, or “qualified nonelective contributions” allocated on the basis of relative compensation but only to eligible non-highly compensated employees. During 2007, the Company contributed $240,300 to the 401(k) plan, $16,200, $9,100 and $9,200 of which was for the benefit of Messrs. Harvard, Duer and Belote, respectively.

 

95


Employment Contracts, Termination and Change in Control Arrangements

In its quest to attract and retain key executives critical to the long term success of the Company, the committee will enter into employment contracts, termination and change in control agreements with executives that are considered vital to carrying out the Company’s mission. These arrangements are commonplace in the financial services industry for executive officers.

On December 14, 1999, the Company and Mr. Harvard entered into an employment agreement regarding his services to the Company. The agreement had a three year initial term, and on December 31 of each year automatically renews for successive two-year terms, unless the Company elects not to extend the term of the agreement. The employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $120,000, which is adjustable annually at the discretion of the Board, and annual cash bonuses in such amounts as determined by the Board. The Company may terminate Mr. Harvard’s employment at any time, but any termination by the Company other than “termination for cause” (as defined in the agreement) will not effect Mr. Harvard’s right to receive compensation or other benefits pursuant to the terms of the agreement. If Mr. Harvard is terminated for cause during the term of agreement, he will have no right to receive compensation or other benefits for any period after such termination. In the event that Mr. Harvard is terminated without cause, he shall receive his salary and certain benefits for a period of twelve months from the date of such termination. The employment agreement will terminate in the event that there is a change in control of the Company, at which time the change in control agreement described below between the Company and Mr. Harvard will become effective and any termination benefits will be determined and paid solely pursuant to the change in control agreement.

The Company also has an agreement with Mr. Harvard that becomes effective upon a change in control of the Company. Under the terms of this agreement, the Company or its successor agrees to continue Mr. Harvard in its employ for a term of three years after the date of a change in control. During the contract term, Mr. Harvard will retain commensurate authority and responsibilities and compensation benefits. He will receive a base salary at least equal to the immediate prior year, a bonus at least equal to the highest annual bonus paid for the two years before the change in control and would be eligible to participate in the most favorable incentive, savings, retirement, welfare benefits, fringe benefits and vacation plans and programs generally applicable to peer executives in the Company and its affiliates. If Mr. Harvard’s employment is terminated during the three years other than for cause or disability as defined in the agreement, or if he should terminate employment because a material term of the contract is breached by the Company, he will be entitled to a lump sum payment, in cash, within thirty days after the date of termination. This lump sum will be equal to 2.99 times the sum of Mr. Harvard’s base salary, annual bonus and equivalent benefits.

On March 1, 2000, the Company and Mr. Duer entered into an employment agreement regarding his services to the Company. The agreement had a one year initial term, and on March 1 of each year automatically renews for a one year term, unless the Company elects not to extend the term of the agreement. The employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $68,500, which is adjustable annually at the discretion of the Board, and other benefits as defined by the agreement. The Company may terminate Mr. Duer’s employment at any time, but any termination by the Company other than “termination for cause” (as defined in the agreement) will not effect Mr. Duer’s right to receive compensation or other benefits pursuant to the terms of the agreement. If Mr. Duer is terminated for cause during the term of agreement, he will have no right to receive compensation or other benefits for any period after such termination. In the event that Mr. Duer is terminated without cause, including termination following a change in control of the Company, or if he resigns after a change in control pursuant to the terms of his agreement, he shall receive his salary and certain benefits for a period of six months from the date of such termination.

 

96


On March 1, 2000, the Company and Mr. Belote entered into an employment agreement regarding his services to the Company. The agreement had a one year initial term, and on March 1 of each year automatically renews for a one year term, unless the Company elects not to extend the term of the agreement. The employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $65,000, which is adjustable annually at the discretion of the Board, and other benefits as defined by the agreement. The Company may terminate Mr. Belote’s employment at any time, but any termination by the Company other than “termination for cause” (as defined in the agreement) will not effect Mr. Belote’s right to receive compensation or other benefits pursuant to the terms of the agreement. If Mr. Belote is terminated for cause during the term of agreement, he will have no right to receive compensation or other benefits for any period after such termination. In the event that Mr. Belote is terminated without cause, including termination following a change in control of the Company, or if he resigns after a change in control pursuant to the terms of his agreement, he shall receive his salary and certain benefits for a period of six months from the date of such termination.

Compensation of Directors

The Compensation Committee determines the compensation of the Board of Directors of the Company. The committee reviews director compensation of peer companies in surveys provided by the Virginia Bankers Association and director compensation from comparable public banking companies available through public filings.

Each member of the Board of Directors of the Company receives an annual retainer of $9,000 regardless of whether he attends meetings of the Board plus $500 for each meeting attended, except for Henry P. Custis, Jr., who receives an annual retainer of $18,000 as Chairman of the Board of the Company plus the $500 attendance fee, and Mr. Harvard, who is not compensated for his service as director. In addition, each director, excluding Mr. Harvard, is paid $250 for each Company or Bank committee meeting attended. The chair of the Investment, Asset/Liability Management and Compensation committees is paid $500 per meeting attended, and the chair of the Audit committee is compensated $700 per meeting, with other audit committee members receiving $350 per meeting attended. The following table sets forth all of the director compensation for 2007.

Director Compensation

 

Name

   Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
   All Other Compensation    Total

Henry P. Custis, Jr

   $ 24,500    -0-    $ 24,500

Terrell E, Boothe (1)

   $ 18,800    -0-    $ 18,800

Richard F. Hall, III

   $ 18,300    -0-    $ 18,300

L. Dixon Leatherbury

   $ 19,300    -0-    $ 19,300

Dr. Lloyd J. Kellam, III (1)

   $ 17,000    -0-    $ 17,000

D. Page Elmore

   $ 15,400    -0-    $ 15,400

 

(1) Mr. Boothe has elected to defer the director fees earned for the Company into the Virginia Bankers Association’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan.

 

97


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2007 and up to the present time, there were transactions between the Company’s banking subsidiary and certain members of the Compensation Committee or their associates, all consisting of extensions of credit by the Bank in the ordinary course of business. Each transaction was made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates, collateral and repayment terms, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with the general public. In the opinion of management and the Company’s Board, none of the transactions involved more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features.

All members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors, and none of them are present or past employees or officers of the Company or its subsidiaries. None of the executive officers has served on the board or compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served on our board or compensation committee.

 

98


Item 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth, as of February 22, 2008, certain information as to the common stock beneficially owned by (i) the only persons or entities, including any “group” as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, who or which was known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) the directors of the Company, (iii) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table below and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

   Amount and Nature
of Beneficial
Ownership (1)
    Percent
of Class
 

Richard F. Hall,

Jr. P. O. Box 6

Accomac, Virginia 23301

   237,600 (2)   9.5 %

Directors and Named Executive Officers:

    

Terrell E. Boothe

   25,577 (2)   1.0 %

Henry P. Custis, Jr

   183,609 (3)   7.3 %

D. Page Elmore

   18,542     *  

Richard F. Hall, III

   58,450 (2)   2.2 %

Scott C. Harvard

   98,719 (2)(4)   3.8 %

Dr. Lloyd J. Kellam, III

   9,033 (2)   *  

L. Dixon Leatherbury

   47,448     1.8 %

J. Anderson Duer, Jr

   23,041 (4)   *  

Steven M. Belote

   23,028 (4)   *  

All directors and executive officers As a group (10 persons)

   506,007 (2)(5)   19.5 %

 

* Represents less than 1% of Company common stock.
(1) For purposes of this table, beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with the provisions of Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act under which, in general, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if he has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting of the security or the power to dispose of or direct the disposition of the security, or if he has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of the security within 60 days.
(2) Includes shares held by affiliated corporations, close relatives and minor children, and shares held jointly with spouses or as custodians or trustees, as follows: Mr. Hall Jr., 86,400 shares; Mr. Boothe, 252 shares; Mr. Hall III, 14,544 shares; Mr. Harvard, 1,657 shares; Dr. Kellam, 93 shares..
(3) Mr. Custis’s address is c/o Custis, Lewis & Dix, P.O. Box 577, Accomac, Virginia 23301.
(4) Includes 61,441, 10,560 and 15,840 shares that may be acquired by Messrs. Harvard, Duer and Belote, respectively, pursuant to currently exercisable options granted under the Company’s 1992 Stock Option Plan and 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.
(5) Includes 98,401 shares that may be acquired by executive officers pursuant to currently exercisable options granted under the Company’s 1992 Stock Option Plan and 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

99


Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2007, relating to the equity compensation plans of the Company pursuant to which grants of options to acquire shares of common stock may be granted from time to time.

 

     Number of Shares to be
Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
    Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
   Number of Shares
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plan

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders (1)

   130,089 (2)   $ 11.35    243,500

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

   —         —      —  
                 

Total

   130,089     $ 11.35    243,500
                 

 

(1) These plans are the Company’s 1992 Stock Option Plan and 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.
(2) Consists of options granted pursuant to the Company’s stock incentive plans.

 

Item 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Certain directors and executive officers of the Company and the Bank, members of their immediate families, and corporations, partnerships and other entities with which such persons are associated, are customers of the Bank. In the ordinary course of business, the Bank makes loans available to such parties which are made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other borrowers, except that the Bank reduces the interest rate by one percentage point on primary residential mortgage loans made to full-time employees. It is the belief of management that these loans neither involve more than the normal risk of collectibility nor present other unfavorable features.

The Bank has a lease agreement with Richard F. Hall, Jr., the former Chairman of the Bank and the father of Richard F. Hall, III, a director, with respect to the real property on which a branch office is located. The initial term of the lease began in 1987 for a twelve year period with four five-year renewals. Each renewal will be at the option of the Bank and the renewal leases will be based on the previous lease rate after being adjusted for changes in the consumer price index. The current lease payment is $2,000 per month.

The Bank’s subsidiary, Shore Investments Inc., has a lease agreement with Accawmacke Associates, a general partnership of which the Company’s Chairman, Henry P. Custis, Jr., is a partner, with respect to the real property on which an investment brokerage office is located. The initial term of the lease began in 2005 for a five year period with two five-year renewals at the option of Shore Investments. The current lease payment is $1,000 per month.

 

100


The Bank has a lease agreement with Richard F. Hall, III with respect to certain billboards the Bank uses for advertising. The lease began in 2006 for a five year period and current lease payments are $800 per month.

 

Item 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The following table shows the fees billed for the audit and other services provided by Goodman & Company, L.L.P. for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

 

     2006    2007

Audit Fees (1)

   $ 38,350    $ 42,050

Audit-related Fees (2)

     —        2,350

Tax Fees (3)

     3,800      3,750

All Other Fees

     —        —  
             

Total

   $ 42,150    $ 48,150
             

 

(1) Audit Fees: Audit fees represent professional services rendered in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Forms 10-Q for the fiscal years.
(2) Audit-related Fees: Audit-related fees represent professional services rendered in connection with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance and miscellaneous other accounting matters.
(3) Tax Fees: Tax fees consisted of tax return preparation and other tax related services rendered.

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit, audit related, and tax services on an annual basis, and in addition, authorizes individual engagements that exceed pre-established thresholds. Any additional engagement that falls below the pre-established thresholds must be reported by management at the Audit Committee meeting immediately following the initiation of such an engagement.

 

101


PART IV

Item 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(a)(1) Financial Statements

The following consolidated financial statements and reports of independent auditors of the Company are in Part II, Item 8 on pages 44 thru 87:

Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 2007 and 2006

Consolidated Statements of Income - Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity - Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules are omitted since they are not required, are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(a)(3) The following exhibits are filed as part of this Form 10-K and this list includes the Exhibit Index.

 

No.

  

Description

  3.1    Articles of Incorporation of Registrant, as amended.*****
  3.2    Bylaws of Registrant.*
10.1    Company’s 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan.*
10.2    Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Scott C. Harvard.***
10.3    Management Continuity Agreement between the Company and Scott C. Harvard.***
10.4    Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.****
10.5    Form of Employment Agreement between the Company and each of J. Anderson Duer, Jr. and Steven M. Belote.******
11.0    Earnings Per Share Computation.**

 

102


21.0    Subsidiaries of the Registrant — Reference is made to “Item 1. Business” for the required information.
31.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
31.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

* Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-35389) filed by the Company with the Commission on September 15, 1997.
** Information required herein is incorporated by reference from Note 15 on page 58 of the financial statements attached hereto to this Form 10-K.
*** Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2001.
**** Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-82838) filed by the Company with the Commission on February 15, 2002.
***** Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the Commission on September 6, 2006.
****** Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

103


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
By:  

/s/ Scott C. Harvard

 

Scott C. Harvard

President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 10, 2008

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

  

Capacity

  

Date

/s/ Henry P. Custis, Jr.

   Chairman of the Board and Director    March 10, 2008
Henry P Custis, Jr.      

/s/ Scott C. Harvard

   President (Principal Executive Officer) and Director    March 10, 2008
Scott C. Harvard      

/s/ Steven M. Belote

   Senior Vice President (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)    March 10, 2008
Steven M. Belote      

/s/ Terrell E. Boothe

   Director    March 10, 2008
Terrell E. Boothe      

/s/ D. Page Elmore

   Director    March 10, 2008
D. Page Elmore      

/s/ Richard F. Hall, III

   Director    March 10, 2008
Richard F. Hall, III      

/s/ Lloyd J. Kellam, III

   Director    March 10, 2008
Lloyd J. Kellam, III      

/s/ L. Dixon Leatherbury

   Director    March 10, 2008
L. Dixon Leatherbury      

 

104

Shore Finance Corp (MM) (NASDAQ:SHBK)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024 Click Here for more Shore Finance Corp (MM) Charts.
Shore Finance Corp (MM) (NASDAQ:SHBK)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024 Click Here for more Shore Finance Corp (MM) Charts.