Table of Contents

 
 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2008
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                      to                     
Commission File Number: 0-18933
ROCHESTER MEDICAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
MINNESOTA   41-1613227
State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)   Identification No.)
     
ONE ROCHESTER MEDICAL DRIVE,    
STEWARTVILLE, MN   55976
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
(507) 533-9600
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer þ   Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
11,822,886 Common Shares as of May 8, 2008.
 
 

 


 

Table of Contents

ROCHESTER MEDICAL CORPORATION

Report on Form 10-Q
for quarter ended
March 31, 2008
         
    Page
       
 
       
       
 
       
    1  
 
       
    2  
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    9  
 
       
    13  
 
       
    13  
 
       
       
 
       
    14  
 
       
    14  
 
       
    14  
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
  Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
  Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
ROCHESTER MEDICAL CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                 
    March 31,     September 30,  
    2008     2007  
    (unaudited)          
Assets:
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 9,118,124     $ 6,671,356  
Marketable securities
    26,456,481       30,465,244  
Accounts receivable, net
    6,854,479       5,527,518  
Inventories, net
    7,809,858       7,698,889  
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    704,401       6,480  
Deferred income tax asset
    1,105,255       876,032  
 
           
Total current assets
    52,048,598       51,245,519  
Property and equipment:
               
Land and buildings
    7,811,363       7,766,658  
Equipment and fixtures
    15,203,024       14,622,361  
 
           
 
    23,014,387       22,389,019  
Less accumulated depreciation
    (13,308,329 )     (12,709,984 )
 
           
Total property and equipment
    9,706,058       9,679,035  
Deferred income tax asset
    787,753       571,721  
Goodwill
    5,765,200       5,920,255  
Finite life intangibles, net
    7,426,253       7,821,562  
Patents, net
    238,342       257,353  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 75,972,204     $ 75,495,445  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity:
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 1,913,309     $ 1,091,874  
Accrued compensation
    752,160       1,109,533  
Accrued expenses
    108,600       869,404  
Current maturities of debt
    1,859,770       1,849,463  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    4,633,839       4,920,274  
Long-term liabilities:
               
Long-term debt, less current maturities
    5,487,887       6,066,246  
 
           
Total long-term liabilities
    5,487,887       6,066,246  
Shareholders’ equity:
               
Common stock, no par value:
               
Authorized — 40,000,000
               
Issued and outstanding shares (11,822,886 — March 31, 2008; 11,690,886 — September 30, 2007)
    51,689,723       50,150,739  
Retained earnings
    14,069,134       13,964,438  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    91,621       393,748  
 
           
Total shareholders’ equity
    65,850,478       64,508,925  
 
           
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 75,972,204     $ 75,495,445  
 
           
Note — The Balance Sheet at September 30, 2007 was derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

1


Table of Contents

ROCHESTER MEDICAL CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    March 31,     March 31,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
Net sales
  $ 9,215,238     $ 8,346,603     $ 17,438,526     $ 15,858,569  
Cost of sales
    4,942,975       3,919,245       9,025,460       7,655,589  
 
                       
Gross profit
    4,272,263       4,427,358       8,413,066       8,202,980  
 
                               
Operating expenses:
                               
Marketing and selling
    2,380,306       1,520,685       4,604,671       2,754,347  
Research and development
    304,257       240,495       533,200       443,265  
General and administrative
    2,016,767       1,709,553       3,631,885       3,758,699  
 
                       
Total operating expenses
    4,701,330       3,470,733       8,769,756       6,956,311  
 
                               
 
                       
Income (loss) from operations
    (429,067 )     956,625       (356,690 )     1,246,669  
 
                               
Other income (expense):
                               
Interest income
    355,646       439,503       808,986       514,353  
Interest expense
    (128,834 )     (153,184 )     (278,323 )     (312,822 )
Other income
                      38,605,000  
 
                       
Net income (loss) before income taxes
    (202,255 )     1,242,944       173,973       40,053,200  
 
                               
Income tax expense (benefit)
    (35,397 )     199,426       69,277       7,543,066  
 
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ (166,858 )   $ 1,043,518     $ 104,696     $ 32,510,134  
 
                       
 
                               
Net income (loss) per share — basic
  $ (0.01 )   $ 0.09       0.01     $ 2.89  
Net income (loss) per share — diluted
  $ (0.01 )   $ 0.08     $ 0.01     $ 2.64  
 
                               
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic
    11,822,435       11,367,295       11,776,083       11,233,207  
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — diluted
    11,822,435       12,475,859       12,557,214       12,331,312  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

2


Table of Contents

ROCHESTER MEDICAL CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2008     2007  
Operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 104,696     $ 32,510,134  
 
               
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation
    601,283       534,249  
Amortization
    361,924       358,359  
Stock based compensation
    786,142       1,461,445  
Deferred income tax
    (374,844 )     135,000  
Federal tax benefit of stock options exercised
    99,634        
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Deferred revenue
          (564,286 )
Accounts receivable
    (1,390,012 )     (155,431 )
Inventories
    (154,043 )     (1,646,575 )
Other current assets
    (326,728 )     18,701  
Accounts payable
    829,806       704,506  
Income tax payable
    (827,465 )     3,591,647  
Other current liabilities
    (249,623 )     (589,135 )
 
           
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
    (539,230 )     36,518,376  
 
               
Investing activities:
               
Capital expenditures
    (668,278 )     (1,092,202 )
Patents
    (11,556 )     (30,579 )
Purchases of marketable securities
    (48,791,975 )     (30,075,000 )
Sales and maturities of marketable securities
    52,416,875        
 
           
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
    2,945,066       (31,197,781 )
 
               
Financing activities:
               
Payments on long-term debt
    (568,053 )     (432,445 )
Payments on capital leases
          (17,248 )
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    653,208       2,234,277  
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    85,155       1,784,584  
 
               
Effect of exchange rate on cash
    (44,223 )     58,397  
 
               
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
    2,446,768       7,163,576  
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    6,671,356       2,906,698  
 
           
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 9,118,124     $ 10,070,274  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
               
Interest paid
  $ 138,586     $ 161,968  
Taxes paid
  $ 1,155,209     $ 3,750,000  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

3


Table of Contents

ROCHESTER MEDICAL CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
March 31, 2008
Note A — Basis of Presentation
          The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements which have been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements and the unaudited March 31, 2008 and 2007 condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission which include the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Operating results for the three-month and six-month periods ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending September 30, 2008.
Note B — Net Income (Loss) Per Share
          Net income (loss) per share is calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” The Company’s basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, increased to include dilutive potential common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options that were outstanding during the period. Net loss per share is computed without consideration for any dilutive securities. A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator in the basic and diluted net income (loss) per share calculation is as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    March 31,     March 31,     March 31,     March 31,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
Numerator:
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ (166,858 )   $ 1,043,518     $ 104,696     $ 32,510,134  
 
                               
Denominator:
                               
Denominator for basic net income per share-weighted average shares outstanding
    11,822,435       11,367,295       11,776,083       11,233,207  
Effect of dilutive stock options
          1,108,564       781,131       1,098,105  
 
                       
Denominator for diluted net income per share-weighted average shares outstanding
    11,822,435       12,475,859       12,557,214       12,331,312  
 
                       
 
                               
Basic net income (loss) per share
  $ (0.01 )   $ 0.09     $ 0.01     $ 2.89  
 
                       
Dilute net income (loss) per share
  $ (0.01 )   $ 0.08     $ 0.01     $ 2.64  
 
                       
          Employee stock options of 512,000 and 3,000 for the second quarter of fiscal years 2008 and 2007 and 30,000 and 1,000 for the six months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, have been excluded from the diluted net income per share calculation because their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock and their affect would have been antidilutive. Due to the net loss in the second quarter ended March 31, 2008, diluted shares were the same as basic shares since the effect of the options would have been anti-dilutive.

4


Table of Contents

Note C — Stock Based Compensation
          The Company has three stock option plans under which options have been granted to employees, including officers and directors of the Company, at a price not less than the fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the date the options were granted. Options under the 1991 Stock Option Plan are no longer granted because the 10-year granting period has expired. The granting period for the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan expires in 2011. Under the 1995 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan, options also may be granted to certain non-employees at a price not less than the fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the date the options are granted. Options generally expire ten years from the date of grant or at an earlier date as determined by the committee of the Board of Directors of the Company that administers the plans. Options granted under the 1991, 1995 and 2001 Plans generally vest over four years from the date of grant.
          Effective October 1, 2005, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”) which requires all share-based payments, including grants of stock options, to be recognized in the statement of operations as an operating expense based on their fair values over the requisite service period. The Company elected to utilize the modified-prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS 123(R). Under this transition method, the Company’s financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS 123(R). Stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 includes: (a) compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, October 1, 2005, based on grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation;” and (b) compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted subsequent to October 1, 2005, based on grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). The Company recorded approximately $535,000 and $786,000 of related stock-based compensation expense for the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2008, and approximately $359,000 and $1,461,000 of related stock-based compensation expense for the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2007. This stock-based compensation expense reduced both basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.05 and $0.03 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $0.06 and $0.13 for the six months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
          As of March 31, 2008, $2,008,844 of unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately fourteen months.
Stock Options
          In the second quarter of fiscal 2008 and 2007, 204,500 and 30,000 shares were granted respectively. The Black-Scholes option pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of stock-based awards with the following weighted average assumptions for the indicated periods.
                 
    2008   2007
Dividend yield
    0 %     0 %
Expected volatility
    54 %     53 %
Risk-free interest rate
    3.08 %     4.50 %
Expected holding period (in years)
    8.13       6.31  
Weighted-average grant-date fair value
  $ 11.14     $ 11.96  
          The risk-free rate is based on a treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected life of our stock options. The expected volatility, holding period, and forfeitures of options are based on historical experience.

5


Table of Contents

          The following table represents stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2008:
                         
            Weighted-     Weighted-  
            Average     Average  
    Number of     Exercise     Remaining  
    Shares     Price     Contract Life  
Outstanding options at beginning of period
    1,646,334     $ 5.98          
Granted
    204,500       11.14          
Exercised
    (1,000 )     2.56          
Canceled
    0                
 
                     
Outstanding options at end of period
    1,849,834     $ 6.55     5.94 Yrs.
 
                     
Outstanding options exercisable at end of period
    1,381,334     $ 5.51     4.97 Yrs.
 
                     
          Shares available for future stock option grants to employees and directors under existing plans were 353,500 at March 31, 2008. At March 31, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding was $7,950,700, and the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable was $7,017,875. Total intrinsic value of options exercised was $1,015,514 for the six months ended March 31, 2008.
Note D — Inventories
          Inventories consist of the following:
                 
    March 31,     September 30,  
    2008     2007  
Raw materials
  $ 1,833,803     $ 1,762,593  
Work-in-process
    3,260,105       3,202,035  
Finished goods
    2,817,072       2,851,288  
Reserve for inventory obsolescence
    (101,122 )     (117,027 )
 
           
 
  $ 7,809,858     $ 7,698,889  
 
           
Note E — Marketable Securities
          As of March 31, 2008, the Company had $26.5 million invested in marketable securities as a result of the cash settlements received from lawsuits. The marketable securities primarily consist of $19 million invested in U.S. treasury bills, $4.8 million invested in a high quality, investment grade municipal bond issued by the State of New Jersey with a variable interest rate that matures within the next 12 months, and $3 million invested in mutual funds. The Company is currently reporting an unrealized loss of $54,563 with respect to the municipal bond because the secondary market for auction rate securities is currently illiquid, and an unrealized loss of $399,742 related to the mutual fund as a result of the recent fluctuations in the credit markets impacting the current market value. The Company considers these unrealized losses temporary as it has the intent and ability to hold these investments long enough to avoid realizing any significant losses.
Note F — Income Taxes
          The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of its net deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Prior to fiscal 2005, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of the realization and timing of the benefits from those deferred tax assets as the Company had not achieved a sufficient level of sustained profitability. During 2005, management concluded that the Company had attained a sufficient level of sustained profitability to allow the valuation allowance to be reduced to reflect management’s estimate of the amount of deferred tax assets that will be realized in the near term. Considering projected levels of future income as well as the nature of the net deferred assets, management reduced the valuation allowance by $454,000 during 2005 resulting in a corresponding income tax benefit in the statement of operations, and management further reduced the allowance by $777,000 in 2006 to reflect management’s revised and increased estimates of future taxable income. During 2007, the Company’s earnings were sufficient to determine all deferred tax assets will be realized and the valuation allowance was therefore reduced to zero. The Company utilized its

6


Table of Contents

entire $21.0 million net operating loss in 2007 which reduced the overall effective state and federal income tax results. As a result, the Company recorded $8.4 million for income tax expense in 2007. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets and assess the requirements for a valuation allowance. For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company had an effective income tax rate of approximately 40%. The Company normally expects the effective tax rate on operating income to be in the range of 34-35%.
          In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (“FIN 48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 provides that the tax effects from an uncertain tax position can be recognized in the Company’s financial statements only if the position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 were effective as of the beginning of fiscal 2008, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The Company adopted FIN 48 in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. There was no material effect on the consolidated financial statements. As a result, there was no cumulative effect related to adopting FIN 48.
          It is the Company’s practice to recognize penalties and/or interest to income tax matters in income tax expense. As of October 1, 2007, the Company did not have any accrued interest or penalties related to FIN 48 adoption as there is no unrecognized tax benefit as of the date of adoption.
          The Company is subject to income tax examinations in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction, as well as in the UK and various state jurisdictions. The Company is not currently under examination by any taxing jurisdiction.
Note G — Comprehensive Income
          Comprehensive income includes net income and all other nonowner changes in shareholders’ equity during a period. The comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 consists of the following:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    March 31,     March 31,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
Net income (loss)
  $ (166,864 )   $ 1,043,518     $ 104,696     $ 32,510,134  
Foreign currency adjustment
    321,311       (8,181 )     81,818       197,428  
Unrealized (loss) gain on securities held
    (267,172 )           (383,945 )      
 
                       
Comprehensive income (loss)
  $ (112,725 )   $ 1,035,337     $ (197,431 )   $ 32,707,562  
 
                       
Note H — Line of Credit and Long-Term Debt
          In June 2006, in conjunction with an asset purchase agreement with Coloplast A/S, the Company entered into an unsecured loan note deed with Coloplast with an outstanding principal amount of $5,340,000. The promissory note is non-interest bearing and payable in five equal annual installments of $1,068,000 payable annually on June 2. The Company discounted the note at 6.90% which reflected the Company’s cost of borrowing at the date of the purchase agreement and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The outstanding balance on the promissory note at March 31, 2008 was $3,902,643.
          In June 2006, the Company entered into a $7,000,000 credit facility with U.S. Bank National Association. The credit facility consists of a $5,000,000 term loan payable in five years and accruing interest at a rate equal to 6.83%, and a revolving line of credit of up to $2,000,000, maturing annually on March 31, with interest payable monthly at a floating rate based on the quoted one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.60%. The Company has renewed the revolving line of credit through March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2008, the Company had no borrowings under the revolving line of credit and the term loan had an outstanding balance of $3,442,654. The obligations of the Company are secured by assets of the Company, including accounts receivable, investments, general intangibles, inventory, and equipment. The term loan agreement and revolving credit agreement require the Company to comply with certain financial covenants, including a fixed charge coverage ratio and minimum working capital of $8 million, and restrict certain additional indebtedness and liens. As of March 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with the bank covenants.

7


Table of Contents

Note I — Litigation Settlements
          The Company is a plaintiff in a lawsuit titled Rochester Medical Corporation vs. C.R. Bard, Inc.; Tyco International (US), Inc.; Tyco Health Care Group, L.P.; Novation LLC; VHA, Inc.; Premier, Inc.; and Premier Purchasing Partners, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Civil Action No. 504-CV-060. This suit alleges anti-competitive conduct against the defendants in the markets for standard and anti-infection Foley catheters as well as urethral catheters, and seeks an unspecified amount of damages and injunctive and other relief.
          On November 20, 2006, the Company announced that it had reached a settlement with Premier, Inc. and Premier Purchasing Partners, L.P. with respect to the lawsuit. Under the settlement agreement, Premier paid the Company $8,825,000 (net $5,155,000 after payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses) and was dismissed from the lawsuit.
          On December 14, 2006, the Company announced it had reached a settlement with C.R. Bard, Inc., whereby C.R. Bard, Inc. paid the Company $49,000,000 (net $33,450,000 after payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses) and was dismissed from the lawsuit.
          On August 6, 2007, the Company announced that it had reached a settlement with Novation LLC with respect to the lawsuit. Under the settlement agreement, Novation awarded the Company an Innovative Technology Contract for its urological catheter products and related accessories, including the Company’s advanced Infection Control catheters, and was dismissed from the lawsuit. The Innovation Technology Contract has a three-year term from the effective date of September 1, 2007. The litigation continues against Tyco, with a new trial date scheduled for December 2008.
          The net proceeds from the settlement payments is recorded in Other Income in the Statement of Operations for the six month period ended March 31, 2007.
Note J — Recently Issued Accounting Standards
          In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157" ). SFAS No. 157 establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure requirements pertaining to fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this guidance may have on its results of operations and financial position.
          In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 159 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
          In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R), among other things, establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination (i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquired business, (ii) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 141(R) for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. This standard will change the Company’s accounting treatment for business combinations on a prospective basis.
          In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160

8


Table of Contents

establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. It also establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary and requires expanded disclosures. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
          We develop, manufacture and market a broad line of innovative, technologically enhanced PVC-free and latex-free urinary continence and urine drainage care products for the extended care and acute care markets. Our products are comprised of our base products, which include our male external catheters and standard silicone Foley catheters, and our advanced products, which include our intermittent catheters, our anti-infection Foley catheters and our FemSoft Insert. We market our products under our Rochester Medical brand, and also supply our products to several large medical product companies for sale under brands owned by these companies, which are referred to as private label sales. The primary markets for our products are distributors, extended care facilities and individual hospitals and healthcare institutions. We sell our products both in the domestic market and internationally. For fiscal 2008, we intend to increase investment in our sales and marketing programs, primarily through cash generated from current operations, to support branded sales growth in the U.S. and Europe.
          The following discussion pertains to our results of operations and financial position for the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. Results of the periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the complete year. For the second quarter ended March 31, 2008, we reported a net loss of $0.01 per diluted share, compared to a net income of $0.08 per diluted share for the same period last year. Loss from operations was $429,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 compared to income from operations of $957,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, while net loss was $167,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 compared to a net income of $1,044,000 for the same period last year.
Results of Operations
          The following table sets forth, for the fiscal periods indicated, certain items from our statements of operations expressed as a percentage of net sales.
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    March 31,   March 31,
    2008   2007   2008   2007
Net Sales
    100 %     100 %     100 %     100 %
Cost of Sales
    54 %     47 %     52 %     48 %
 
                               
Gross Margin
    46 %     53 %     48 %     52 %
 
                               
Operating Expenses:
                               
Marketing and Selling
    26 %     18 %     26 %     17 %
Research and Development
    3 %     3 %     3 %     3 %
General and Administrative
    22 %     20 %     21 %     24 %
 
                               
Total Operating Expenses
    51 %     41 %     50 %     44 %
 
                               
Income from Operations
    (5 )%     12 %     (2) %     8 %
Interest Income (Expense), Net
    3 %     3 %     3 %     1 %
Other Income,
    0 %     0 %     0 %     243 %
 
                               
Net Income before taxes
    (2 )%     15 %     1 %     252 %
 
                               
Income tax expense
    0 %     2 %     0 %     48 %
 
                               
Net Income after taxes
    (2 )%     13 %     1 %     204 %
 
                               

9


Table of Contents

          The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, net sales information by product category (base products and advanced products), marketing method (private label and Rochester Medical ® branded sales) and distribution channel (domestic and international markets) (all dollar amounts below are in thousands):
                                                 
    Fiscal Quarter Ended March 31,  
            2008                     2007        
    Domestic     International     Total     Domestic     International     Total  
Private label sales:
                                               
Base products
  $ 2,095     $ 948     $ 3,043     $ 1,730     $ 1,294     $ 3,024  
Advanced products
     441              441        175        525        700  
 
                                   
Total private label sales
  $ 2,535     $ 948     $ 3,483     $ 1,905     $ 1,819     $ 3,724  
 
                                               
Branded sales:
                                               
Base products
  $ 1,000     $ 4,024     $ 5,024     $ 963     $ 3,086     $ 4,049  
Advanced products
     616       92        708        429        145        574  
 
                                   
Total branded sales
  $ 1,616     $ 4,116     $ 5,732     $ 1,392     $ 3,231     $ 4,623  
 
                                               
Total net sales:
  $ 4,151     $ 5,064     $ 9,215     $ 3,297     $ 5,050     $ 8,347  
 
                                   
                                                 
    Fiscal Year to Date Ended March 31  
            2008                     2007        
    Domestic     International     Total     Domestic     International     Total  
Private label sales:
                                               
Base products
  $ 3,423     $ 1,884     $ 5,307     $ 3,558     $ 2,300     $ 5,858  
Advanced products
     605              605        442        550        992  
 
                                   
Total private label sales
  $ 4,028     $ 1,884     $ 5,912     $ 4,000     $ 2,850     $ 6,850  
 
                                               
Branded sales:
                                               
Base products
  $ 1,997     $ 8,143     $ 10,140     $ 1,818     $ 6,123     $ 7,941  
Advanced products
    1,203        185       1,388        819        249       1,068  
 
                                   
Total branded sales
  $ 3,200     $ 8,328     $ 11,528     $ 2,637     $ 6,372     $ 9,009  
 
                                               
Total net sales:
  $ 7,228     $ 10,212     $ 17,440     $ 6,637     $ 9,222     $ 15,859  
 
                                   
Three Month and Six Month Periods Ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007
           Net Sales. Net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 increased 10% to $9,215,000 from $8,347,000 for the comparable quarter of last fiscal year. The sales increase primarily resulted from an increase in sales of branded product both domestically and in the U.K. Domestic sales of branded products increased by 16% for the quarter compared to the same period last year. Our international branded sales increased 27% compared to the same period last year. Private label sales decreased 6% for the quarter compared to the same period last year. However, last year included $525,000 of deferred revenue related to a private label agreement that was terminated. Excluding that deferred revenue, private label sales increased 9% for the quarter.
          Net sales for the six months ended March 31, 2008 increased 10% to $17,439,000 from $15,859,000 for the comparable six-month period of last fiscal year. Factors affecting the comparative six-month sales are generally consistent with those discussed above for the current quarter. However, excluding the deferred revenue, private label sales decreased 6% for the six months ended March 31, 2008.
           Gross Margin . Our gross margin as a percentage of net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 was 46% compared to 53% for the comparable quarter of last fiscal year. The decrease in gross margin this quarter was primarily due to material cost increases, a change in product mix, manufacturing variances and the recognition of $525,000 of deferred revenue in the prior year.

10


Table of Contents

           Marketing and Selling. Marketing and selling expense primarily includes costs associated with base salary paid to sales and marketing personnel, sales commissions, and travel and advertising expense. Marketing and selling expense for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 increased 57% to $2,380,000 from $1,521,000 for the comparable quarter of last fiscal year. The increase in marketing and selling expense is primarily due to increased sales personnel and related expenses incurred through the addition of sales and marketing staff in both our U.S. and U.K. operations, and increased advertising expense related to marketing in the U.K. and the U.S. acute care market. Marketing and selling expense as a percentage of net sales for the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was 26% and 18%, respectively.
          Marketing and selling expense for the six months ended March 31, 2008 increased 67% to $4,605,000 from $2,754,000 for the comparable six-month period of last fiscal year. Factors affecting the comparative six-month expense levels are generally consistent with those discussed above for the current quarter.
           Research and Development. Research and development expense primarily includes internal labor costs, as well as expense associated with third-party vendors performing validation and investigative research regarding our products and development activities. Research and development expense for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 increased 27% to $304,000 from $240,000 for the comparable quarter of last fiscal year. The increase in research and development expense relates primarily to increased expenses related to testing and development of new and enhanced products. Research and development expense as a percentage of net sales for the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was 3% and 3%, respectively.
          Research and development expense for the six months ended March 31, 2008 increased 20% to $533,000 from $443,000 for the comparable six-month period of last fiscal year. The factors affecting the increase in research and development expense for the six months ended March 31, 2008 are generally consistent with those discussed above for the current quarter.
           General and Administrative. General and administrative expense primarily includes payroll expense relating to our management and accounting, information technology and human resources staff, as well as fees and expenses of outside legal counsel and accounting advisors. General and administrative expense for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 increased 18% to $2,017,000 from $1,710,000 for the comparable quarter of last fiscal year. The increase in general and administrative expense is primarily related to increased legal fees associated with potential acquisitions, stock option compensation expenses and audit related expenses. General and administrative expense as a percentage of net sales for the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was 22% and 20%, respectively.
          General and administrative expense for the six months ended March 31, 2008 decreased 3% to $3,632,000 from $3,759,000 for the comparable six-month period of last fiscal year. The decrease in general and administrative expenses for the six month period primarily reflects an increase in legal and audit fees offset by a decrease in stock option compensation expenses from the prior year.
           Interest Income. Interest income for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 decreased 19% to $356,000 from $440,000 for the comparable quarter of last fiscal year. The decrease in interest income reflects lower amounts being invested than the previous year and at lower interest rates.
          Interest income for the six months ended March 31, 2008 increased 57% to $809,000 from $514,000 for the comparable six-month period of last fiscal year. The increase reflects significantly higher investment balances for the entire six months in fiscal 2008 resulting from proceeds of lawsuit settlements received late in the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
           Interest Expense . Interest expense for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 decreased $24,000 to $129,000 from the comparable quarter of last fiscal year. The decrease in interest expense reflects lower amounts of debt as a result of quarterly debt payments.
          Interest expense for the six months ended March 31, 2008 decreased $35,000 to $278,000 from $313,000 for the comparable six-month period of last fiscal year. The decrease in interest expenses are generally consistent with those discussed above for the current quarter.

11


Table of Contents

           Income Taxes . We recorded a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of our net deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Prior to fiscal 2005, we recorded a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of the realization and timing of the benefits from those deferred tax assets as we had not achieved a sufficient level of sustained profitability. During 2005, management concluded that we had attained a sufficient level of sustained profitability to allow the valuation allowance to be reduced to reflect management’s estimate of the amount of deferred tax assets that will be realized in the near term. During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, our earnings fully offset the valuation allowance. We utilized our entire $20.7 million net operating loss carryforward during fiscal 2007. For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company had an effective income tax rate of approximately 40%. In future periods of taxable earnings, we expect to report an income tax provision using an effective tax rate to be in the range of 34 — 35%.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
          Our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $35.6 million at March 31, 2008 compared to $37.1 million at September 30, 2007. The decrease in cash primarily resulted from cash provided from operations and the sale of common stock upon exercise of options offset by capital expenditures and repayment of long-term debt. As of March 31, 2008, we had $26.5 million invested in marketable securities as a result of the cash settlements received from lawsuits. The marketable securities primarily consist of $19 million invested in U.S. treasury bills, $4.8 million invested in a high quality, investment grade municipal bond issued by the State of New Jersey with a variable interest rate that matures within the next 12 months, and $3 million invested in mutual funds. We are currently reporting an unrealized loss of $54,563 with respect to the municipal bond because the secondary market for auction rate securities is currently illiquid, and an unrealized loss of $399,742 related to the mutual fund as a result of the recent fluctuations in the credit markets impacting the current market value. We consider these unrealized losses temporary as we have the intent and ability to hold these investments long enough to avoid realizing any significant losses.
          During the six-month period ended March 31, 2008, we used $539,000 of cash in operating activities compared to $36,518,000 of cash being provided by operations during the comparable period of the prior fiscal year. Decreased net cash from operating activities in the first six months of fiscal 2008 primarily reflects net income before depreciation and increases in accounts receivable, inventories and other current assets and decreases in income tax payable and other current liabilities, offset by increases in accounts payable. Accounts receivable balances during this period increased 25% or $1,390,000, primarily due to the timing of large shipments. Inventories increased 2% or $154,000. Accounts payable increased 76% or $830,000, primarily reflecting timing of expenses. Other current liabilities decreased 13% or $250,000 primarily reflecting payments of annual executive bonuses. Income tax payable decreased $827,000 in the current period due to various state tax payments. In addition, capital expenditures during this period were $668,000 compared to $1,092,000 for the comparable period last year.
          In June 2006, we entered into a $7,000,000 credit facility with U.S. Bank National Association. The credit facility consists of a $5,000,000 term loan payable in five years and accruing interest at a rate equal to 6.83%, and a revolving line of credit of up to $2,000,000, maturing annually on March 31, with interest payable monthly at a floating rate based on the quoted one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.60%. We have renewed the revolving line of credit through March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2008, we had no borrowings under the revolving line of credit and the term loan had an outstanding balance of $3,442,654. Our obligations are secured by our assets, including accounts receivable, investments, general intangibles, inventory, and equipment. The term loan agreement and revolving credit agreement require us to comply with certain financial covenants, including a fixed charge coverage ratio and minimum working capital of $8 million, and restrict certain additional indebtedness and liens. As of March 31, 2008, we were in compliance with the bank covenants.
          We believe that our capital resources on hand at March 31, 2008, together with cash generated from sales, will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital requirements for the foreseeable future as described in the Liquidity and Capital Resources portion of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. In the event that additional financing is needed, we may seek to raise additional funds through public or private financing. Any additional equity financing may be dilutive to shareholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve significant restrictive covenants. Failure to raise capital when needed could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that such financing, if required, will be available on terms satisfactory to us, if at all.

12


Table of Contents

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Information
          Statements other than historical information contained herein constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology such as “believe,” “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “intend,” “designed,” “estimate,” “should” or “continue” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Such forward-looking statements involve known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, the following:
    the uncertainty of market acceptance of new product introductions;
 
    the uncertainty of gaining new strategic relationships;
 
    the uncertainty of timing of revenues from private label sales (particularly with respect to international customers);
 
    the uncertainty of successfully integrating and growing our new UK operations and the risks associated with operating an international business;
 
    FDA and other regulatory review and response times;
 
    the securing of Group Purchasing Organization contract participation;
 
    the uncertainty of gaining significant sales from secured GPO contracts;
and other risk factors listed from time to time in our SEC reports, including, without limitation, the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
          Our primary financial instrument market risk results from fluctuations in interest rates. Our cash is invested in bank deposits and money market funds denominated in United States dollars and British pounds. The carrying value of these cash equivalents approximates fair market value. Our investments in marketable securities are subject to interest rate risk and the value thereof could be adversely affected due to movements in interest rates. We are currently reporting an unrealized loss of $54,563 with respect to a high quality, investment grade municipal bond issued by the State of New Jersey with a variable interest rate that matures within the next 12 months because the secondary market for auction rate securities is currently illiquid, and an unrealized loss of $399,742 related to a mutual fund as a result of the recent fluctuations in the credit markets impacting the current market value. We consider these unrealized losses temporary as we have the intent and ability to hold these investments long enough to avoid realizing any significant losses. Our revolving line of credit bears interest at a floating rate based on the quoted one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.60%. As of March 31, 2008, we had no borrowings under the revolving line of credit.
          In future periods, we believe a greater portion of our revenues could be denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, thereby increasing our exposure to exchange rate gains and losses on non-United States currency transactions. Sales through our subsidiary, Rochester Medical, Ltd., are denominated in British pounds, and fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the U.S. dollar and the British pound could adversely affect our financial results.
          Otherwise, we do not believe our operations are currently subject to significant market risks for interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices or other relevant market price risks of a material nature. We do not currently use derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk or enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge exposure to foreign currencies, or any other derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. In the future, if we believe an increase in our currency exposure merits further review, we may consider entering into transactions to mitigate that risk.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
           Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures . As of the end of the period covered by this report (the Evaluation Date) we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the Exchange Act)). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded

13


Table of Contents

that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
           Changes in Internal Controls . During our second fiscal quarter, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
          We are the plaintiff in a lawsuit titled Rochester Medical Corporation vs. C.R. Bard, Inc.; Tyco International (US), Inc.; Tyco Health Care Group, L.P.; Novation LLC; VHA, Inc.; Premier, Inc.; and Premier Purchasing Partners, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Civil Action No. 504-CV-060. This suit alleges anti-competitive conduct against the defendants in the markets for standard and anti-infection Foley catheters as well as urethral catheters, and seeks an unspecified amount of damages and injunctive and other relief.
          On November 20, 2006, we announced that we had reached a settlement with Premier, Inc. and Premier Purchasing Partners, L.P. with respect to the lawsuit. Under the settlement agreement, Premier paid us $8,825,000 (net $5,155,000 after payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses) and was dismissed from the lawsuit. On December 14, 2006, we announced we had reached a settlement with C.R. Bard, Inc., whereby C.R. Bard, Inc. paid us $49,000,000 (net $33,450,000 after payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses) and was dismissed from the lawsuit.
          On August 6, 2007, we announced that we had reached a settlement with Novation LLC with respect to the lawsuit. Under the settlement agreement, Novation awarded us an Innovative Technology Contract for our urological catheter products and related accessories, including our advanced Infection Control catheters, and was dismissed from the lawsuit. The Innovation Technology Contract has a three-year tem from the effective date of September 1, 2007. The litigation continues against Tyco, with a new trial date scheduled for December 2008.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
          The Annual Meeting of the Company’s shareholders was held on February 5, 2008. At the meeting, shareholders voted on the reelection of five directors for terms expiring at the Annual Meeting of the Company in 2009. Each of the directors was reelected by a vote as follows:
    Anthony J. Conway received 10,713,221 votes “For” and 189,965 votes were “Withheld.”
 
    Darnell L. Boehm received 10,562,296 votes “For” and 340,890 votes were “Withheld.”
 
    Peter R. Conway received 10,220,327 votes “For” and 682,859 votes were “Withheld.”
 
    Roger W. Schnobrich received 10,673,171 votes “For” and 230,015 votes were “Withheld.”
 
    Benson Smith received 10,559,286 votes “For” and 343,900 votes were “Withheld.”
Item 6. Exhibits
31.1   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
 
31.2   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
 
32.1   Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
 
32.2   Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

14


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  ROCHESTER MEDICAL CORPORATION
 
 
Date: May 12, 2008  By:   /s/ Anthony J. Conway    
    Anthony J. Conway   
    President and Chief Executive Officer    
 
     
Date: May 12, 2008  By:   /s/ David A. Jonas    
    David A. Jonas   
    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer    
 

15


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
31.1   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
 
31.2   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
 
32.1   Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
 
32.2   Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

16

Rochester Medical Corp. (MM) (NASDAQ:ROCM)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2024 to Jun 2024 Click Here for more Rochester Medical Corp. (MM) Charts.
Rochester Medical Corp. (MM) (NASDAQ:ROCM)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2023 to Jun 2024 Click Here for more Rochester Medical Corp. (MM) Charts.