UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended:
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
o
|
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number: 0-26001
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
22-3640393
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
West 80 Century Road
|
|
|
Paramus, New Jersey
|
|
07652
|
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(201) 967-1900
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
þ
As of November 2, 2009, the registrant had 525,312,983 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value,
outstanding.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and may be identified by the use
of such words as may, believe, expect, anticipate, should, plan, estimate, predict,
continue, and potential or the negative of these terms or other corresponding terminology.
Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to estimates with respect to
the financial condition, results of operations and business of Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. These
factors include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the timing and occurrence or non-occurrence of events may be subject to circumstances
beyond our control;
|
|
|
|
|
increases in competitive pressure among the financial institutions or from non-financial
institutions;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the interest rate environment may reduce interest margins or affect the value
of our investments;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in deposit flows, loan demand or real estate values may adversely affect our
business;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines may cause our financial
condition to be perceived differently;
|
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions, either nationally or locally in some or all of the areas in
which we do business, or conditions in the securities markets or the banking industry may
be less favorable than we currently anticipate;
|
|
|
|
|
legislative or regulatory changes that may adversely affect our business;
|
|
|
|
|
applicable technological changes that may be more difficult or expensive than we
anticipate;
|
|
|
|
|
success or consummation of new business initiatives that may be more difficult or
expensive than we anticipate;
|
|
|
|
|
litigation or matters before regulatory agencies, whether currently existing or
commencing in the future, that may delay the occurrence or non-occurrence of events longer
than we anticipate;
|
|
|
|
|
the risks associated with continued diversification of assets and adverse changes to
credit quality;
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties associated with achieving expected future financial results; and
|
|
|
|
|
the risk of an economic slowdown that would adversely affect credit quality and loan
originations.
|
Our ability to predict results or the actual effects of our plans or strategies is inherently
uncertain. As such, forward-looking statements can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might
make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statement
can be guaranteed. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this filing. We do not intend to update any of the
forward-looking statements after the date of this Form 10-Q or to conform these statements to
actual events.
Page 3
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
217,461
|
|
|
$
|
184,915
|
|
Federal funds sold and other overnight deposits
|
|
|
453,017
|
|
|
|
76,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
670,478
|
|
|
|
261,811
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
9,550,806
|
|
|
|
9,915,554
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
2,117,664
|
|
|
|
3,413,633
|
|
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities (fair value of $11,170,719 at September 30, 2009
and $9,695,445 at December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
10,751,866
|
|
|
|
9,572,257
|
|
Investment securities (fair value of $3,217,143 at September 30, 2009
and $50,512 at December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
3,238,044
|
|
|
|
50,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
25,658,380
|
|
|
|
22,951,530
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
31,122,330
|
|
|
|
29,418,888
|
|
Net deferred loan costs
|
|
|
80,649
|
|
|
|
71,670
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(114,833
|
)
|
|
|
(49,797
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
31,088,146
|
|
|
|
29,440,761
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock
|
|
|
877,017
|
|
|
|
865,570
|
|
Foreclosed real estate, net
|
|
|
12,777
|
|
|
|
15,532
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
310,520
|
|
|
|
299,045
|
|
Banking premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
71,110
|
|
|
|
73,502
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
152,109
|
|
|
|
152,109
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
43,998
|
|
|
|
85,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
58,884,535
|
|
|
$
|
54,145,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
$
|
22,523,737
|
|
|
$
|
17,949,846
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
|
590,212
|
|
|
|
514,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
23,113,949
|
|
|
|
18,464,042
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
15,100,000
|
|
|
|
15,100,000
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances
|
|
|
14,925,000
|
|
|
|
15,125,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds
|
|
|
30,025,000
|
|
|
|
30,225,000
|
|
Due to brokers
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
239,100
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
275,405
|
|
|
|
278,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
53,614,354
|
|
|
|
49,206,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 3,200,000,000 shares authorized;
741,466,555 shares issued; 524,889,925 shares outstanding
at September 30, 2009 and 523,770,617 shares outstanding
at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
7,415
|
|
|
|
7,415
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
4,670,808
|
|
|
|
4,641,571
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
2,347,827
|
|
|
|
2,196,235
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 216,576,630 shares at September 30, 2009 and
217,695,938 shares at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(1,740,467
|
)
|
|
|
(1,737,838
|
)
|
Unallocated common stock held by the employee stock ownership plan
|
|
|
(211,738
|
)
|
|
|
(216,244
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
196,336
|
|
|
|
47,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,270,181
|
|
|
|
4,938,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
58,884,535
|
|
|
$
|
54,145,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
Page 4
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Interest and Dividend Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans
|
|
$
|
424,521
|
|
|
$
|
394,748
|
|
|
$
|
1,252,011
|
|
|
$
|
1,110,121
|
|
Consumer and other loans
|
|
|
5,212
|
|
|
|
6,245
|
|
|
|
16,629
|
|
|
|
19,978
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity
|
|
|
128,996
|
|
|
|
123,890
|
|
|
|
368,212
|
|
|
|
372,354
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
|
|
114,821
|
|
|
|
101,410
|
|
|
|
374,995
|
|
|
|
259,872
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity
|
|
|
30,835
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
44,920
|
|
|
|
12,764
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
27,155
|
|
|
|
40,825
|
|
|
|
107,074
|
|
|
|
121,354
|
|
Dividends on Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock
|
|
|
12,281
|
|
|
|
12,510
|
|
|
|
30,698
|
|
|
|
40,729
|
|
Federal funds sold and other overnight deposits
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
4,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and dividend income
|
|
|
744,165
|
|
|
|
681,317
|
|
|
|
2,195,246
|
|
|
|
1,941,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
112,925
|
|
|
|
133,983
|
|
|
|
375,003
|
|
|
|
433,398
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
305,783
|
|
|
|
292,256
|
|
|
|
908,558
|
|
|
|
826,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
418,708
|
|
|
|
426,239
|
|
|
|
1,283,561
|
|
|
|
1,259,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
325,457
|
|
|
|
255,078
|
|
|
|
911,685
|
|
|
|
681,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
92,500
|
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses
|
|
|
285,457
|
|
|
|
250,078
|
|
|
|
819,185
|
|
|
|
671,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and other income
|
|
|
2,513
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
7,207
|
|
|
|
6,490
|
|
Gain on securities transactions, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
|
2,513
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
31,392
|
|
|
|
6,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits
|
|
|
34,043
|
|
|
|
32,052
|
|
|
|
103,166
|
|
|
|
94,896
|
|
Net occupancy expense
|
|
|
7,965
|
|
|
|
7,633
|
|
|
|
24,260
|
|
|
|
22,437
|
|
Federal deposit insurance assessment
|
|
|
10,930
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
23,294
|
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
FDIC special assessment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
9,982
|
|
|
|
8,793
|
|
|
|
30,843
|
|
|
|
26,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
|
|
62,920
|
|
|
|
49,423
|
|
|
|
202,661
|
|
|
|
145,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
225,050
|
|
|
|
202,836
|
|
|
|
647,916
|
|
|
|
531,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
89,964
|
|
|
|
80,928
|
|
|
|
257,248
|
|
|
|
210,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
135,086
|
|
|
$
|
121,908
|
|
|
$
|
390,668
|
|
|
$
|
321,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
489,545,739
|
|
|
|
484,759,567
|
|
|
|
488,048,312
|
|
|
|
483,915,018
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
491,992,378
|
|
|
|
495,715,998
|
|
|
|
491,356,241
|
|
|
|
495,298,081
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
Page 5
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
(Unaudited
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
$
|
7,415
|
|
|
$
|
7,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
4,641,571
|
|
|
|
4,578,578
|
|
Stock option plan expense
|
|
|
9,901
|
|
|
|
11,338
|
|
Tax benefit from stock plans
|
|
|
18,003
|
|
|
|
14,066
|
|
Allocation of ESOP stock
|
|
|
4,633
|
|
|
|
8,006
|
|
RRP stock granted
|
|
|
(6,771
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of RRP stock
|
|
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
4,670,808
|
|
|
|
4,613,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
2,196,235
|
|
|
|
2,002,049
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
390,668
|
|
|
|
321,280
|
|
Dividends paid on common stock ($0.44 and $0.32 per share, respectively)
|
|
|
(214,926
|
)
|
|
|
(154,809
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
(24,150
|
)
|
|
|
(11,871
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
2,347,827
|
|
|
|
2,156,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
(1,737,838
|
)
|
|
|
(1,771,106
|
)
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
(43,477
|
)
|
|
|
(3,600
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
34,077
|
|
|
|
20,018
|
|
RRP stock granted
|
|
|
6,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
(1,740,467
|
)
|
|
|
(1,754,688
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated common stock held by the ESOP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
(216,244
|
)
|
|
|
(222,251
|
)
|
Allocation of ESOP stock
|
|
|
4,506
|
|
|
|
4,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
(211,738
|
)
|
|
|
(217,745
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
47,657
|
|
|
|
16,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available for sale
arising
during period, net of tax expense (benefit) of $112,963 and ($24,160) in
2009 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
163,568
|
|
|
|
(34,983
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains in net income, net of tax
expense of $9,880 and $0 in 2009 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
(14,305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustment, net of tax
benefit of
$403 and $108 for 2009 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
(584
|
)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income(loss), net of tax
|
|
|
148,679
|
|
|
|
(35,139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
196,336
|
|
|
|
(18,517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
5,270,181
|
|
|
$
|
4,786,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
390,668
|
|
|
$
|
321,280
|
|
Other comprehensive income(loss), net of tax
|
|
|
148,679
|
|
|
|
(35,139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
539,347
|
|
|
$
|
286,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 6
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
390,668
|
|
|
$
|
321,280
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, accretion and amortization expense
|
|
|
48,690
|
|
|
|
20,061
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
92,500
|
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
Net gain on sale of securities
|
|
|
(24,185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation, including committed ESOP shares
|
|
|
22,511
|
|
|
|
24,880
|
|
Deferred tax benefit
|
|
|
(29,580
|
)
|
|
|
(15,757
|
)
|
Increase in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
(11,475
|
)
|
|
|
(36,457
|
)
|
Increase in other assets
|
|
|
(11,166
|
)
|
|
|
(7,590
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(25,868
|
)
|
|
|
30,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
452,095
|
|
|
|
347,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originations of loans
|
|
|
(4,656,065
|
)
|
|
|
(4,008,755
|
)
|
Purchases of loans
|
|
|
(2,451,388
|
)
|
|
|
(2,553,897
|
)
|
Principal payments on loans
|
|
|
5,340,970
|
|
|
|
2,218,412
|
|
Principal collection of mortgage-backed securities held to maturity
|
|
|
1,827,195
|
|
|
|
1,076,247
|
|
Purchases of mortgage-backed securities held to maturity
|
|
|
(3,017,731
|
)
|
|
|
(1,185,106
|
)
|
Principal collection of mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
|
|
1,604,549
|
|
|
|
750,785
|
|
Purchases of mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
|
|
(1,992,789
|
)
|
|
|
(4,279,939
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of mortgage backed securities available for sale
|
|
|
785,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and calls of investment securities held to maturity
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
1,358,485
|
|
Purchases of investment securities held to maturity
|
|
|
(3,040,329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and calls of investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
2,622,225
|
|
|
|
1,349,902
|
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
(1,331,300
|
)
|
|
|
(1,900,000
|
)
|
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock
|
|
|
(78,272
|
)
|
|
|
(137,189
|
)
|
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock
|
|
|
66,825
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
Purchases of premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
(4,881
|
)
|
|
|
(6,546
|
)
|
Net proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
12,218
|
|
|
|
4,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investment Activities
|
|
|
(4,262,862
|
)
|
|
|
(7,312,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits
|
|
|
4,649,907
|
|
|
|
2,134,081
|
|
Proceeds from borrowed funds
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
5,500,000
|
|
Principal payments on borrowed funds
|
|
|
(950,000
|
)
|
|
|
(366,000
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(214,926
|
)
|
|
|
(154,809
|
)
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(43,477
|
)
|
|
|
(3,600
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
9,927
|
|
|
|
8,147
|
|
Tax benefit from stock plans
|
|
|
18,003
|
|
|
|
14,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
|
|
4,219,434
|
|
|
|
7,131,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
408,667
|
|
|
|
167,428
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
261,811
|
|
|
|
217,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
|
|
$
|
670,478
|
|
|
$
|
384,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
1,282,653
|
|
|
$
|
1,242,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred to foreclosed real estate
|
|
$
|
14,998
|
|
|
$
|
11,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax payments
|
|
$
|
279,347
|
|
|
$
|
208,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 7
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Organization
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. (Hudson City Bancorp or the Company) is a Delaware corporation
organized in March 1999 by Hudson City Savings Bank (Hudson City Savings) in connection with the
conversion and reorganization of Hudson City Savings from a New Jersey mutual savings bank into a
two-tiered mutual savings bank holding company structure. Prior to June 7, 2005, a majority of
Hudson City Bancorps common stock was owned by Hudson City, MHC, a mutual holding company. On
June 7, 2005, Hudson City Bancorp, Hudson City Savings and Hudson City, MHC reorganized from a
two-tier mutual holding company structure to a stock holding company structure, and Hudson City MHC
was merged into Hudson City Bancorp.
2. Basis of Presentation
In our opinion, all the adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments) necessary for
a fair presentation of the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations
for the unaudited periods presented have been included. The results of operations and other data
presented for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily
indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the
statements of financial condition and the results of operations for the period. Actual results
could differ from these estimates. The allowance for loan losses is a material estimate that is
particularly susceptible to near-term change. The current economic environment has increased the
degree of uncertainty inherent in this material estimate.
Certain information and note disclosures usually included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the
preparation of the Form 10-Q. The consolidated financial statements presented should be read in
conjunction with Hudson City Bancorps audited consolidated financial statements and notes to
consolidated financial statements included in Hudson City Bancorps December 31, 2008 Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Page 8
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
3. Earnings Per Share
The following is a summary of our earnings per share calculations and reconciliation of basic to
diluted earnings per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
135,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
121,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
135,086
|
|
|
|
489,546
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
121,908
|
|
|
|
484,760
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive common
stock equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
135,086
|
|
|
|
491,992
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
121,908
|
|
|
|
495,716
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
390,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
321,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
390,668
|
|
|
|
488,048
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
321,280
|
|
|
|
483,915
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive common
stock equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
390,668
|
|
|
|
491,356
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
321,280
|
|
|
|
495,298
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 9
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
4. Fair Value and Unrealized Losses of Securities
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Companys investments
with unrealized losses that are deemed to be temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment
category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
$
|
2,271,003
|
|
|
$
|
(27,639
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,271,003
|
|
|
$
|
(27,639
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
283,509
|
|
|
|
(2,521
|
)
|
|
|
62,836
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
346,345
|
|
|
|
(2,695
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired
securities held to
maturity
|
|
|
2,554,512
|
|
|
|
(30,160
|
)
|
|
|
62,836
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
2,617,348
|
|
|
|
(30,334
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
367,807
|
|
|
|
(6,890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,807
|
|
|
|
(6,890
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
169,051
|
|
|
|
(1,448
|
)
|
|
|
40,111
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
209,162
|
|
|
|
(1,533
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired
securities available
for sale
|
|
|
536,858
|
|
|
|
(8,338
|
)
|
|
|
40,111
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
576,969
|
|
|
|
(8,423
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,091,370
|
|
|
$
|
(38,498
|
)
|
|
$
|
102,947
|
|
|
$
|
(259
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,194,317
|
|
|
$
|
(38,757
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
241,669
|
|
|
$
|
(1,873
|
)
|
|
$
|
628,203
|
|
|
$
|
(6,200
|
)
|
|
$
|
869,872
|
|
|
$
|
(8,073
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired
securities held to
maturity
|
|
|
241,669
|
|
|
|
(1,873
|
)
|
|
|
628,203
|
|
|
|
(6,200
|
)
|
|
|
869,872
|
|
|
|
(8,073
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
594,907
|
|
|
|
(5,093
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594,907
|
|
|
|
(5,093
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
408,040
|
|
|
|
(6,766
|
)
|
|
|
467,660
|
|
|
|
(18,109
|
)
|
|
|
875,700
|
|
|
|
(24,875
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired
securities available
for sale
|
|
|
1,002,947
|
|
|
|
(11,859
|
)
|
|
|
467,660
|
|
|
|
(18,109
|
)
|
|
|
1,470,607
|
|
|
|
(29,968
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,244,616
|
|
|
$
|
(13,732
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,095,863
|
|
|
$
|
(24,309
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,340,479
|
|
|
$
|
(38,041
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unrealized losses are primarily due to the changes in market interest rates subsequent to
purchase. We only purchase securities issued by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) and
do not own any
unrated or private label securities or other high-risk securities such as those backed by sub-prime
loans. Accordingly, it is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than
the Companys amortized cost basis. We do not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 since the decline in
market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality and the Company
has the intent and ability to hold these investments until there is a full recovery of the
unrealized loss, which may be at maturity.
5. Stock Repurchase Programs
Under our previously announced stock repurchase programs, shares of Hudson City Bancorp common
stock may be purchased in the open market and through other privately negotiated transactions,
depending on market conditions. The repurchased shares are held as treasury stock, which may be
reissued for general corporate use. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we purchased
4.0 million shares of our
Page 10
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
common stock at an aggregate cost of $43.5 million. As of September 30,
2009, there remained 50,123,550 shares that may be purchased under the existing stock repurchase
programs.
6. Fair Value Measurements
a) Fair Value Measurements
The Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. ASC Topic 820 applies only to fair value measurements already required or
permitted by other accounting standards and does not impose requirements for additional fair value
measures. ASC Topic 820 was issued to increase consistency and comparability in reporting fair
values.
We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and to determine
fair value disclosures. We did not have any liabilities that were measured at fair value at
September 30, 2009. Our securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring
basis. Additionally, from time to time, we may be required to record at fair value other assets or
liabilities on a non-recurring basis, such as foreclosed real estate owned, certain impaired loans
and goodwill. These non-recurring fair value adjustments generally involve the write-down of
individual assets due to impairment losses.
In accordance with ASC Topic 820-10-35-01, we group our assets at fair value in three levels, based
on the markets in which the assets are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to
determine fair value. These levels are:
Level 1 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active
markets.
Level 2 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted
prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based
valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3 Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not
observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect our own estimates of assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include
the use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques. The results
cannot be
determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the
asset or liability.
We base our fair values on the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 requires us to
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring
fair value.
Assets that we measure on a recurring basis are limited to our available-for-sale securities
portfolio. Our available-for-sale portfolio is carried at estimated fair value with any unrealized
gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in
shareholders equity. Substantially all of our available-for-sale portfolio consists of
mortgage-backed securities and investment securities issued by GSEs. The fair values for
substantially all of these securities are obtained from an independent nationally recognized
pricing service. Based on the nature of our securities, our independent pricing service provides
us with prices which are categorized as Level 2 since quoted prices in active markets for
Page 11
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
identical
assets are generally not available for the majority of securities in our portfolio. Various
modeling techniques are used to determine pricing for our mortgage-backed securities, including
option pricing and discounted cash flow models. The inputs to these models include benchmark
yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark
securities, bids, offers and reference data. We also own equity securities with a carrying value
of $7.2 million for which fair values are obtained from quoted market prices in active markets and,
as such, are classified as Level 1.
The following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine the carrying
value of our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Markets for Identical
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
Description
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Assets (Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
9,550,806
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,550,806
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
2,117,664
|
|
|
|
7,178
|
|
|
|
2,110,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale
|
|
$
|
11,668,470
|
|
|
$
|
7,178
|
|
|
$
|
11,661,292
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at September 30, 2009 were limited
to non-performing commercial and construction loans that are collateral dependent and foreclosed
real estate. Commercial and construction loans evaluated for impairment in accordance with FASB
guidance amounted to $10.8 million at September 30, 2009. Based on this evaluation, we established
an allowance for loan losses of $2.1 million for such impaired loans. The provision for loan
losses related to these loans amounted to $1.3 million for the first nine months of 2009. These
impaired loans are individually assessed to determine that the loans carrying value is not in
excess of the fair value of the collateral, less estimated selling costs. Since all of our
impaired loans at September 30, 2009 are secured by real estate, fair value is estimated through
current appraisals, where practical, or an inspection and a comparison of the property securing the
loan with similar properties in the area by either a licensed appraiser or real estate broker and,
as such, are classified as Level 3.
Foreclosed real estate represents real estate acquired as a result of foreclosure or by deed in
lieu of foreclosure and is carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs.
Fair value is estimated through current appraisals, where practical, or an inspection and a
comparison of the property
securing the loan with similar properties in the area by either a licensed appraiser or real estate
broker and, as such, foreclosed real estate properties are classified as Level 3. Foreclosed real
estate at September 30, 2009 amounted to $12.8 million. During the first nine months of 2009 and
2008, charge-offs to the allowance for loan losses related to loans that were transferred to
foreclosed real estate amounted to $2.9 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Write downs and
net loss on sale related to foreclosed real estate that were charged to non-interest expense
amounted to $2.0 million and $852,000 for those same respective periods.
Page 12
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine the carrying
value of our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Markets for Identical
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
Description
|
|
Assets (Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,787
|
|
Foreclosed real
estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,777
|
|
b) Fair Value Disclosures
The fair value of financial instruments represents the estimated amounts at which the asset or
liability could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a
forced liquidation sale. These estimates are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and
matters of judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions
could significantly affect the estimates. Further, certain tax implications related to the
realization of the unrealized gains and losses could have a substantial impact on these fair value
estimates and have not been incorporated into any of the estimates.
Carrying amounts of cash, due from banks and federal funds sold are considered to approximate fair
value. The carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (FHLB) stock equals cost. The
fair value of FHLB stock is based on redemption at par value.
The fair value of one- to four-family mortgages and home equity loans are generally estimated using
the present value of expected future cash flows, assuming future prepayments and using market rates
for new loans with comparable credit risk.
For time deposits and fixed-maturity borrowed funds, the fair value is estimated by discounting
estimated future cash flows using currently offered rates. Structured borrowed funds are valued
using an option valuation model which uses assumptions for anticipated calls of borrowings based on
market interest rates and weighted-average life. For deposit liabilities payable on demand, the
fair value is the carrying value at
the reporting date. There is no material difference between the fair value and the carrying
amounts recognized with respect to our off-balance sheet commitments.
Other important elements that are not deemed to be financial assets or liabilities and, therefore,
not considered in these estimates include the value of Hudson City Bancorps retail branch delivery
system, its existing core deposit base and banking premises and equipment.
Page 13
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The estimated fair value of Hudson City Bancorps financial instruments are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
217,461
|
|
|
$
|
217,461
|
|
|
$
|
184,915
|
|
|
$
|
184,915
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
453,017
|
|
|
|
453,017
|
|
|
|
76,896
|
|
|
|
76,896
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity
|
|
|
3,238,044
|
|
|
|
3,217,143
|
|
|
|
50,086
|
|
|
|
50,512
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
2,117,664
|
|
|
|
2,117,664
|
|
|
|
3,413,633
|
|
|
|
3,413,633
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock
|
|
|
877,017
|
|
|
|
877,017
|
|
|
|
865,570
|
|
|
|
865,570
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity
|
|
|
10,751,866
|
|
|
|
11,170,719
|
|
|
|
9,572,257
|
|
|
|
9,695,445
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
|
|
9,550,806
|
|
|
|
9,550,806
|
|
|
|
9,915,554
|
|
|
|
9,915,554
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
31,088,146
|
|
|
|
32,781,765
|
|
|
|
29,440,761
|
|
|
|
29,743,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
23,113,949
|
|
|
|
23,438,557
|
|
|
|
18,464,042
|
|
|
|
18,486,681
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
30,025,000
|
|
|
|
33,181,508
|
|
|
|
30,225,000
|
|
|
|
34,156,052
|
|
7. Postretirement Benefit Plans
We maintain non-contributory retirement and post-retirement plans to cover employees hired prior to
August 1, 2005, including retired employees, who have met the eligibility requirements of the
plans. Benefits under the qualified and non-qualified defined benefit retirement plans are based
primarily on years of service and compensation. Funding of the qualified retirement plan is
actuarially determined on an annual basis. It is our policy to fund the qualified retirement plan
sufficiently to meet the minimum requirements set forth in the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974. The non-qualified retirement plan, which is maintained for certain employees, is
unfunded.
In 2005, we limited participation in the non-contributory retirement plan and the post-retirement
benefit plan to those employees hired on or before July 31, 2005. We also placed a cap on paid
medical expenses at
the 2007 rate, beginning in 2008, for those eligible employees who retire after December 31, 2005.
As part of our acquisition of Sound Federal Bancorp, Inc. (Sound Federal) in 2006, participation
in the Sound Federal retirement plans and the accrual of benefits for such plans were frozen as of
the acquisition date.
Page 14
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The components of the net periodic expense for the plans were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
1,003
|
|
|
$
|
881
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,863
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(1,939
|
)
|
|
|
(2,135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
1,836
|
|
|
$
|
591
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
3,009
|
|
|
$
|
2,643
|
|
|
$
|
702
|
|
|
$
|
759
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5,589
|
|
|
|
5,046
|
|
|
|
1,587
|
|
|
|
1,632
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(5,817
|
)
|
|
|
(6,405
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
2,472
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
(1,173
|
)
|
|
|
(1,173
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
5,508
|
|
|
$
|
1,773
|
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we made contributions of $35.0 million
and $3.2 million, respectively, to the pension plans.
Page 15
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
8. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock Option Plans
A summary of the changes in outstanding stock options is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Average
|
|
Stock
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise Price
|
Outstanding at beginning of
period
|
|
|
26,728,119
|
|
|
$
|
10.35
|
|
|
|
29,080,114
|
|
|
$
|
7.91
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,375,000
|
|
|
|
12.11
|
|
|
|
4,025,000
|
|
|
|
15.96
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(4,240,913
|
)
|
|
|
2.33
|
|
|
|
(2,516,951
|
)
|
|
|
3.26
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,784
|
)
|
|
|
13.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
25,862,206
|
|
|
$
|
11.89
|
|
|
|
30,539,379
|
|
|
$
|
9.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2006, our shareholders approved the Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan
(the SIP Plan) authorizing us to grant up to 30,000,000 shares of common stock. In July 2006, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Hudson City Bancorp (the Committee),
authorized grants to each non-employee director, executive officers and other employees to purchase
shares of the Companys common stock, pursuant to the SIP Plan. Grants were made in 2006, 2007 and
2008 pursuant to the SIP Plan for 7,960,000, 3,527,500 and 4,025,000 options, respectively, at an
exercise price equal to the fair value of our common stock on the grant date, based on quoted
market prices. Of these options, 5,035,000 have vesting periods ranging from one to five years and
an expiration period of ten years. The remaining 10,477,500 shares have vesting periods ranging
from two to three years if certain financial performance measures are met. Subject to review and
verification by the Committee, we believe
we attained these performance measures and have therefore recorded compensation expense for the
2006, 2007 and 2008 grants.
During 2009, the Committee authorized stock option grants (the 2009 grants) pursuant to the SIP
Plan for 3,375,000 options at an exercise price equal to the fair value of our common stock on the
grant date, based on quoted market prices. Of these options, 2,875,000 will vest in January 2012 if
certain financial performance measures are met and employment continues through the vesting date.
The remaining 500,000 options will vest between January 2010 and April 2010. The 2009 grants have
an expiration period of ten years. We have determined that it is probable these performance
measures will be met and have therefore recorded compensation expense for the 2009 grants.
Page 16
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The fair value of the 2009 grants was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions. As a result of low employee
turnover, the assumption regarding the forfeiture rate of option grants had no effect on the fair
value estimate. The per share weighted-average fair value of the options granted during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 was $1.94.
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
4.80%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
29.72%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
1.68%
|
Expected option life
|
|
5.3 years
|
Compensation expense related to our outstanding stock options amounted to $3.0 million and $3.8
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $9.9 million and
$11.3 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Stock Awards
During 2009, the Committee authorized performance-based stock awards (the 2009 stock awards)
pursuant to the SIP Plan for 847,750 shares of our common stock. These shares were issued from
treasury stock and will vest in annual installments over a three-year period if certain performance
measures are met and employment continues through the vesting date. None of these shares may be
sold or transferred before the January 2012 vesting date. We have determined that it is probable
these performance measures will be met and have therefore recorded compensation expense for the
2009 stock awards. Expense for the 2009 stock awards is recognized over the vesting period and is
based on the fair value of the shares on the grant date which was $12.03. In addition to the 2009
stock awards, we have 56,157 shares of unvested stock awards that were granted in prior years.
Total compensation expense for stock awards amounted to $1.2 million and $330,000 for each of the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
and $3.5 million and $1.0 million, for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
9. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amendments to the
accounting and disclosure requirements for revenue recognition. These amendments, effective for
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 (early adoption is permitted), modify the criteria
for recognizing revenue in multiple element arrangements and the scope of what constitutes a
non-software deliverable. The Company is currently assessing the impact on its consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB Codification (the Codification) was issued. The Codification is the source
of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to
be applied by non-governmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority
of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The
Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other
non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification became
non-authoritative. The Codification was effective for financial statements issued for interim and
annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The implementation of the Codification did not
have an impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
Page 17
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting and disclosure requirements for the
consolidation of variable interest entities. The guidance affects the overall consolidation
analysis and requires enhanced disclosure on involvement with variable interest entities. The
guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We do not expect that
the guidance will have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or
financial statement disclosures.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting and disclosure requirements for
transfers of financial assets. The guidance defines the term participating interest to establish
specific conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale. If the
transfer does not meet those conditions, a transferor should account for the transfer as a sale
only if it transfers an entire financial asset or a group of entire financial assets and surrenders
control over the entire transferred asset(s). The guidance requires that a transferor recognize and
initially measure at fair value all assets obtained (including a transferors beneficial interest)
and liabilities incurred as a result of a transfer of financial assets accounted for as a sale. The
guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period
that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period,
and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. We do not expect that the guidance will
have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or financial statement
disclosures.
In May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance on subsequent events. The guidance establishes general
standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but
before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The guidance sets forth (a)
the period after the balance sheet date during which an entity should evaluate events or
transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements,
(b) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after
the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (c) the disclosures that an entity should
make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The guidance does
not result in significant changes in the subsequent events an entity reports, either through
recognition or disclosure, in the financial statements. The guidance requires the disclosure
of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date,
that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were
available to be issued. The guidance was effective for interim and annual periods after June 15,
2009. The guidance did not have any effect on our financial condition, results of operations or
financial statement disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued a staff position that provides additional guidance for estimating
fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly
decreased. The staff position notes that a reporting entity should evaluate various factors to
determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and activity for the asset or
liability when compared with normal activity for the asset or liability. These factors include, but
are not limited to: few recent transactions (based on volume and level of activity in the market),
price quotations are not based on current information, price quotations vary substantially over
time or among market makers, indexes that previously were highly correlated with the fair values of
the asset are demonstrably uncorrelated with recent fair values, abnormal liquidity risk premiums
or implied yields for quoted prices when compared with reasonable estimates of credit and other
non-performance risk for the asset class, abnormally wide bid-ask spread or significant increases
in the bid-ask spread, and little information is released publicly. If the reporting entity
concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume or activity for the asset or
liability in relation to normal market activity, then further analysis of the transactions or
quoted prices is needed. This would include a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple
valuation techniques to assist in the determination of a fair value of the asset or liability. The
staff position was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and was to
be applied prospectively. Our adoption of the staff position effective April
Page 18
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1, 2009, did not have
a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or financial statement
disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued a staff position requiring disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements. This staff
position requires an entity to disclose in the body or in the accompanying notes of its interim
financial statements and its annual financial statements the fair value of all financial
instruments, whether recognized or not recognized in the statements of financial position. Fair
value information disclosed in the interim period notes will be presented together with the related
carrying amount in a form that makes it clear whether the fair value and carrying amount represent
assets or liabilities and how the carrying amount relates to what is reported in the statements of
financial position. An entity will also disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to
estimate the fair value of financial instruments. This staff position was effective for interim
reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending
after March 15, 2009. We adopted the staff position in the second quarter of 2009 and have
provided the required interim period disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued a staff position which changes the method for determining whether an
other-than-temporary impairment exists for debt securities and the amount of the impairment to be
recognized in earnings. This staff position requires that an entity assess whether an impairment
of a debt security is other-than-temporary and, as part of that assessment, determine its intent
and ability to hold the security. If the entity intends to sell the debt security, an
other-than-temporary impairment shall be considered to have occurred. In addition, an
other-than-temporary impairment shall be considered to have occurred if it is more likely than not
that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost.
Other-than-temporary impairments that are attributable to credit losses are to be recognized in
income with the remaining decline in the fair value of a security recognized in other comprehensive
income. This staff position was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after (but not before) March 15,
2009. We adopted
the staff position effective April 1, 2009 which did not have a material impact on our financial
condition, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
In September 2008, FASB issued guidance which addresses whether share-based payments are
participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings
allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS) under the two-class method. The guidance
concluded that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends
or dividend equivalents are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of
EPS pursuant to the two-class method. Our restricted stock awards are considered participating
securities. The guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning after December 15, 2008. All prior-period EPS data presented shall be adjusted
retrospectively. The guidance did not have a material impact on our computation of EPS.
In December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance on non-controlling interests which establishes
accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The guidance clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a
subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in
the consolidated financial statements. The guidance requires that a parent recognize a gain or
loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. A parent deconsolidates a subsidiary as of
the date the parent ceases to have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. If a parent
retains a non-controlling equity investment in the former subsidiary, that investment is measured
at its fair value. The gain or loss on the deconsolidation of the subsidiary is measured using the
fair value of the non-controlling equity investment. The guidance requires
Page 19
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
expanded disclosures in
the consolidated financial statements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests
of the controlling (parent) and the non-controlling owners of a subsidiary. This includes a
reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the equity attributable to the parent and
the non-controlling owners and a schedule showing the effects of changes in a parents ownership
interest in a subsidiary on the equity attributable to the parent. The guidance was effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15,
2008. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material impact on our financial condition or
results of operations.
Page 20
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Executive Summary
We continue to focus on our traditional consumer-oriented business model by growing our franchise
through the origination and purchase of one- to four-family mortgage loans and funding this loan
production with deposit growth and borrowings. During 2009, we were able to fund our loan
production with deposit growth.
Our results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which, in part, is a direct
result of the market interest rate environment. Net interest income is the difference between the
interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, primarily mortgage loans, mortgage-backed
securities and investment securities, and the interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities,
primarily time deposits, interest-bearing transaction accounts and borrowed funds. Net interest
income is affected by the shape of the market yield curve, the timing of the placement and
repricing of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities on our balance sheet, the
prepayment rate on our mortgage-related assets and the calls of our borrowings. Our results of
operations may also be affected significantly by national and local economic and competitive
conditions, particularly those with respect to changes in market interest rates, credit quality,
government policies and actions of regulatory authorities. Our results are also affected by the
market price of our stock, as the expense of our employee stock ownership plan is related to the
current price of our common stock.
The Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve Bank (the FOMC) noted that economic
activity and conditions within the financial markets have improved in recent months. However, the
national unemployment rate increased to 9.8% in September 2009 as compared to 9.5% in June 2009 and
7.2% in December 2008. The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index for the New York metropolitan area,
where most of our lending activity occurs, declined by approximately 5.3% in the first nine months
of 2009 and by 9.15% in 2008. The S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index decreased by
4.8% in the first half of 2009 and by 18.2% in 2008. Lower household wealth and tight credit
conditions in addition to the increase in the national unemployment rate has resulted in the FOMC
maintaining the overnight lending rate at zero to 0.25% during the third quarter of 2009. As a
result, short-term market interest rates have remained at low levels during the third quarter of
2009. This allowed us to continue to re-price our short-term deposits thereby reducing our cost of
funds. While longer-term market interest rates increased during the third quarter of 2009, rates on
mortgage-related assets have declined slightly, although to a lesser extent than the decline in our
cost of funds. As a result, our net interest rate spread and net interest margin increased from
the second quarter of 2009 as well as from the third quarter of 2008.
Net income increased 10.8% for the third quarter of 2009 to $135.1 million as compared to $121.9
million for the third quarter of 2008. Net income increased 21.6% for the first nine months of
2009 to $390.7 million as compared to $321.3 million for the first nine months of 2008. These
increases occurred in the face of significantly higher deposit insurance fees, including an across
the industry special assessment imposed in the second quarter of 2009 by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (the FDIC), as well as a significantly higher provision for loan losses.
Net interest income increased $70.4 million, or 27.6%, to $325.5 million for the third quarter 2009
as compared to $255.1 million for the third quarter of 2008. During the third quarter of 2009, our
net interest rate spread increased 32 basis points to 2.02% and our net interest margin increased
22 basis points to 2.30% as compared to 2.08% for the third quarter in 2008. Net interest income
increased $230.2
Page 21
million, or 33.8%, to $911.7 million for the first nine months of 2009 as compared to $681.5
million for the same period in 2008. During the first nine months of 2009, our net interest rate
spread increased 36 basis points to 1.88% and our net interest margin increased 25 basis points to
2.18% as compared to 1.93% for the same period in 2008. The increases in our net interest rate
spread and net interest margin were due to a steeper yield curve which allowed us to reduce deposit
costs at a faster pace than the decrease in our mortgage yields.
The provision for loan losses amounted to $40.0 million for the third quarter of 2009 and $92.5
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $5.0 million and $10.5 million
for the same respective periods in 2008. The increase in the provision for loan losses reflects
the risks inherent in our loan portfolio due to decreases in real estate values in our lending
markets, the increase in non-performing loans, the increase in loan charge-offs, the continued
weakened economic conditions and rising levels of unemployment during the first nine months of
2009. Non-performing loans amounted to $517.6 million or 1.66% of total loans at September 30,
2009 as compared to $217.6 million or 0.74% of total loans at December 31, 2008. Net charge-offs
amounted to $13.2 million for the third quarter of 2009 and $27.5 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to $1.4 million and $2.6 million for the same respective periods in
2008. The increase in non-performing loans reflects the current weakened economic conditions
coupled with the continued deterioration of the housing market. The conditions in the housing
market are evidenced by declining house prices, reduced levels of home sales, increasing
inventories of houses on the market, and an increase in the length of time houses remain on the
market.
Total non-interest income was $31.4 million for the first nine months of 2009 as compared to $6.5
million for the comparable period in 2008. Included in non-interest income were net gains on
securities transactions, $24.0 million of which resulted from the sale of $761.6 million of
mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale. Proceeds from the securities sale were primarily
used to fund the purchase of first mortgage loans during the second quarter of 2009. In addition,
service charges and other income increased slightly for both the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the comparable periods in 2008.
Total non-interest expense increased $13.5 million, or 27.3%, to $62.9 million for the third
quarter of 2009 from $49.4 million for the third quarter of 2008. The increase is primarily due to
increases of $10.0 million in Federal deposit insurance expense, $2.0 million in compensation and
employee benefits expense, and $1.2 million in other non-interest expense. Total non-interest
expense increased $56.9 million, or 39.0%, to $202.7 million for the first nine months of 2009 from
$145.8 million for the same period in 2008. The increase is primarily due to the FDIC special
assessment of $21.1 million and increases of $21.5 million in Federal deposit insurance expense,
$8.3 million in compensation and employee benefits expense, and $4.1 million in other non-interest
expense.
We grew our assets by 8.7% to $58.88 billion at September 30, 2009 from $54.15 billion at December
31, 2008. We grew our assets by 21.9% during 2008. We slowed our growth rate in 2009 as mortgage
refinancing activity caused an increase in loan repayments and available reinvestment yields on
securities decreased. We may continue to grow at a slower rate than in the past until market
conditions provide for more profitable growth.
Loans increased $1.65 billion to $31.09 billion at September 30, 2009 from $29.44 billion at
December 31, 2008. While the residential real estate markets have weakened considerably during
the past year, low market interest rates and an increase in mortgage refinancing caused by market
interest rates that are at
Page 22
near-historic lows have resulted in increased loan originations. The increase in refinancing
activity has also resulted in an increase in principal repayments.
Total securities increased $2.71 billion to $25.66 billion at September 30, 2009 from $22.95
billion at December 31, 2008. The increase in securities was primarily due to purchases (including
purchases recorded in the third quarter of 2009 with settlement dates after September 30, 2009) of
mortgage-backed and investment securities of $5.01 billion and $4.57 billion, respectively,
partially offset by principal collections on mortgage-backed securities of $3.43 billion and sales
of mortgage-backed securities of $761.6 million and calls of investment securities of $2.67
billion.
The increase in our total assets during the first nine months of 2009 was funded primarily by an
increase in customer deposits. Deposits increased $4.65 billion to $23.11 billion at September 30,
2009 from $18.46 billion at December 31, 2008. The increase in deposits was attributable to growth
in our time deposits and money market accounts. Borrowed funds decreased $200.0 million to $30.03
billion at September 30, 2009 from $30.23 billion at December 31, 2008.
Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
Total assets increased $4.73 billion, or 8.7%, to $58.88 billion at September 30, 2009 from $54.15
billion at December 31, 2008.
Loans increased $1.65 billion, or 5.6%, to $31.09 billion at September 30, 2009 from $29.44 billion
at December 31, 2008 due primarily to the origination of residential first mortgage loans in New
Jersey, New York and Connecticut as well as our continued loan purchase activity. For the first
nine months of 2009, we originated $4.66 billion and purchased $2.45 billion of loans, compared to
originations of $4.01 billion and purchases of $2.55 billion for the comparable period in 2008.
The origination and purchases of loans were partially offset by principal repayments of $5.34
billion in the first nine months of 2009 as compared to $2.22 billion for the first nine months of
2008. Loan originations have increased primarily due to our competitive rates and an increase in
mortgage refinancing caused by market interest rates that are at near-historic lows. The increase
in refinancing activity occurring in the marketplace has also caused an increase in principal
repayments during the first nine months of 2009.
Our first mortgage loan originations and purchases during the first nine months of 2009 were
substantially all in one-to four-family mortgage loans. Approximately 45.0% of mortgage loan
originations for the first nine months of 2009 were variable-rate loans as compared to
approximately 58.0% for the comparable period in 2008. Approximately 46.0% of mortgage loans
purchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were fixed-rate mortgage loans.
Fixed-rate mortgage loans accounted for 74.4% of our first mortgage loan portfolio at September 30,
2009 and 75.7% at December 31, 2008.
Non-performing loans amounted to $517.6 million or 1.66% of total loans at September 30, 2009 as
compared to $217.6 million or 0.74% of total loans at December 31, 2008.
Page 23
The following table presents the geographic distribution of our total loan portfolio, as well as
the geographic distribution of our non-performing loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
Non-performing loans
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
Non-performing loans
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
43.6
|
%
|
|
|
44.6
|
%
|
|
|
44.8
|
%
|
|
|
40.4
|
%
|
New York
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
|
|
22.6
|
%
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total New York
metropolitan area
|
|
|
73.0
|
%
|
|
|
67.7
|
%
|
|
|
69.7
|
%
|
|
|
65.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
Illinois
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
Maryland
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Michigan
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
All others
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
%
|
|
|
32.3
|
%
|
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
|
|
34.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities increased $814.9 million to $20.30 billion at September 30, 2009
from $19.49 billion at December 31, 2008. This increase in total mortgage-backed securities
resulted from the purchase of $5.01 billion of mortgage-backed securities, primarily collateralized
mortgage obligations, all of which were issued by GSEs. The increase was partially offset by
repayments of $3.43 billion and sales of $761.6 million. At September 30, 2009, variable-rate
mortgage-backed securities accounted for 69.1% of our portfolio compared with 83.5% at December 31,
2008. The purchase of variable-rate mortgage-backed securities is a component of our interest rate
risk management strategy. Since our loan portfolio includes a concentration of fixed-rate mortgage
loans, the purchase of variable-rate mortgage-backed securities provides us with an asset that
reduces our exposure to interest rate fluctuations.
Total investment securities increased $1.90 billion to $5.36 billion at September 30, 2009 as
compared to $3.46 billion at December 31, 2008. The increase in investment securities is primarily
due to purchases of $4.57 billion. The increase was partially offset by calls of investment
securities of $2.67 billion.
Since we invest primarily in securities issued by GSEs, there were no debt securities past due or
securities for which the Company currently believes it is not probable that it will collect all
amounts due according to the contractual terms of the security.
Total cash and cash equivalents increased $408.7 million to $670.5 million at September 30, 2009 as
compared to $261.8 million at December 31, 2008. This increase is due to liquidity being provided
by strong deposit growth and increased repayments on mortgage-related assets. In addition, we have
maintained a higher level of Federal funds sold since other types of short- and medium-term
investments are currently providing relatively low yields. Other assets decreased $41.5 million,
primarily due to a decrease in deferred tax assets of $50.9 million.
Page 24
Total liabilities increased $4.40 billion, or 8.9%, to $53.61 billion at September 30, 2009 from
$49.21 billion at December 31, 2008. The increase in total liabilities primarily reflected a $4.65
billion increase in deposits, partially offset by a $200.0 million decrease in borrowed funds.
Total deposits increased $4.65 billion, or 25.2%, to $23.11 billion at September 30, 2009 as
compared to $18.46 billion at December 31, 2008. The increase in total deposits included a $2.39
billion increase in our time deposits, a $1.84 billion increase in our money market checking
accounts and a $337.6 million increase in our interest-bearing transaction accounts and savings
accounts. The increases in our deposits reflect our strategy to expand our branch network and to
grow deposits in our existing branches by offering competitive rates. At September 30, 2009 we had
131 branches as compared to 127 at December 31, 2008 and 125 at September 30, 2008. We also began
accepting deposits through our internet banking service in December 2008, which had $183.9 million
in deposits at September 30, 2009.
Borrowings amounted to $30.03 billion at September 30, 2009 as compared to $30.23 billion at
December 31, 2008. The decrease in borrowed funds was the result of repayments of $950.0 million
with a weighted average rate of 1.63%, largely offset by $750.0 million of new borrowings at a
weighted-average rate of 1.69%. During the first nine months of 2009, we modified $650.0 million
of borrowings to extend the call dates of the borrowings by between two and four years. Borrowed
funds at September 30, 2009 were comprised of $14.93 billion of FHLB advances and $15.10 billion of
securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
Substantially all of our borrowed funds are callable at the discretion of the lender after an
initial non-call period. As a result, if interest rates were to decrease, or remain consistent
with current rates, these borrowings would probably not be called and our average cost of existing
borrowings would not decrease even as market interest rates decrease. Conversely, if interest
rates increase above the market interest rate for similar borrowings, these borrowings would likely
be called at their next call date and our cost to replace these borrowings would increase. These
call features are generally quarterly, after an initial non-call period of one to five years from
the date of borrowing.
Our callable borrowings typically have a final maturity of ten years and may not be called for an
initial period of one to five years. We have used this type of borrowing primarily to fund our
loan growth because these borrowings have a longer duration than shorter-term non-callable
borrowings and have a lower cost than a non-callable borrowing with a maturity date similar to the
initial call date of the callable borrowing. However, during the first nine months of 2009, we
have been able to fund our asset growth with deposit inflows. We anticipate that we will be able
to continue to use deposit growth to fund our asset growth, however, we may use borrowings as a
supplemental funding source if deposit growth decreases. In order to fund our growth and provide
for our liquidity we may borrow a combination of short-term borrowings with maturities of three to
six months and longer term fixed-maturity borrowings with terms of two to five years. Our new
borrowings during the first nine months of 2009 consisted of non-callable borrowings of $400.0
million with maturities of one to three months and $350.0 million of non-callable borrowings with
maturities of two to three years.
The Company has two collateralized borrowings in the form of repurchase agreements totaling $100.0
million with Lehman Brothers, Inc. Lehman Brothers, Inc. is currently in liquidation under the
Securities Industry Protection Act. Mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost of
approximately $114.5 million are pledged as collateral for these borrowings. We intend to pursue
full recovery of the pledged collateral in accordance with the contractual terms of the repurchase
agreements. There can be no assurances that the final settlement of this transaction will result
in the full recovery of the collateral or the
Page 25
full amount of the claim. We have not recognized a loss in our financial statements related to
these repurchase agreements.
Due to brokers amounted to $200.0 million at September 30, 2009 as compared to $239.1 million at
December 31, 2008. Due to brokers at September 30, 2009 represents securities purchased in the
third quarter of 2009 with settlement dates in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Total shareholders equity increased $331.4 million to $5.27 billion at September 30, 2009 from
$4.94 billion at December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily due to net income of $390.7 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and a $148.6 million increase in accumulated other
comprehensive income, primarily due to an increase in the net unrealized gain on securities
available-for-sale. These increases to shareholders equity were partially offset by cash dividends
paid to common shareholders of $214.9 million and repurchases of our common stock of $43.5 million.
As of September 30, 2009, there remained 50,123,550 shares that may be purchased under our existing
stock repurchase programs. During the first nine months of 2009, we repurchased 4.0 million shares
of our outstanding common stock at a total cost of $43.5 million. The average price of shares
repurchased in the first nine months was $10.95. Our capital ratios remain in excess of the
regulatory requirements for a well-capitalized bank. See Liquidity and Capital Resources.
The accumulated other comprehensive income of $196.3 million at September 30, 2009 includes a
$223.9 million after-tax net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale ($378.5 million
pre-tax) partially offset by a $27.6 million after-tax accumulated other comprehensive loss related
to the funded status of our employee benefit plans.
At September 30, 2009, our shareholders equity to asset ratio was 8.95% compared with 9.12% at
December 31, 2008. For the first nine months of 2009, the ratio of average shareholders equity to
average assets was 9.05% compared with 9.94% for the same period in 2008. The lower
equity-to-assets ratios reflect our strategy to grow assets and pay dividends. Our book value per
share, using the period-end number of outstanding shares, less purchased but unallocated employee
stock ownership plan shares and less purchased but unvested recognition and retention plan shares,
was $10.75 at September 30, 2009 and $10.10 at December 31, 2008. Our tangible book value per
share, calculated by deducting goodwill and the core deposit intangible from shareholders equity,
was $10.43 as of September 30, 2009 and $9.77 at December 31, 2008.
Page 26
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Average Balance Sheet.
The following table presents the average balance sheets, average yields
and costs and certain other information for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The table presents the annualized average yield on interest-earning assets and the annualized
average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. We derived the yields and costs by dividing
annualized income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities, respectively, for the periods shown. We derived average balances from daily balances
over the periods indicated. Interest income includes fees that we considered to be adjustments to
yields. Yields on tax-exempt obligations were not computed on a tax equivalent basis. Nonaccrual
loans were included in the computation of average balances and therefore have a zero yield. The
yields set forth below include the effect of deferred loan origination fees and costs, and purchase
discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earnings assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans, net (1)
|
|
$
|
30,445,939
|
|
|
$
|
424,521
|
|
|
|
5.58
|
%
|
|
$
|
27,431,258
|
|
|
$
|
394,748
|
|
|
|
5.76
|
%
|
Consumer and other loans
|
|
|
369,556
|
|
|
|
5,212
|
|
|
|
5.64
|
|
|
|
418,760
|
|
|
|
6,245
|
|
|
|
5.97
|
|
Federal funds sold and other overnight deposits
|
|
|
475,094
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
181,122
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities at amortized cost
|
|
|
19,943,911
|
|
|
|
243,817
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
17,288,478
|
|
|
|
225,300
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
878,827
|
|
|
|
12,281
|
|
|
|
5.59
|
|
|
|
827,393
|
|
|
|
12,510
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
Investment securities, at amortized cost
|
|
|
4,996,795
|
|
|
|
57,990
|
|
|
|
4.64
|
|
|
|
3,373,018
|
|
|
|
41,699
|
|
|
|
4.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
57,110,122
|
|
|
|
744,165
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
49,520,029
|
|
|
|
681,317
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-earnings assets
|
|
|
1,068,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
769,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
58,178,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,289,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
$
|
759,757
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
727,060
|
|
|
|
1,378
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction accounts
|
|
|
1,831,426
|
|
|
|
7,351
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
1,609,380
|
|
|
|
12,248
|
|
|
|
3.03
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
4,109,583
|
|
|
|
17,606
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
2,484,464
|
|
|
|
20,112
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
15,311,050
|
|
|
|
86,531
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
11,435,317
|
|
|
|
100,245
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
22,011,816
|
|
|
|
112,925
|
|
|
|
2.04
|
|
|
|
16,256,221
|
|
|
|
133,983
|
|
|
|
3.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
15,100,000
|
|
|
|
154,175
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
|
|
14,046,628
|
|
|
|
144,769
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances
|
|
|
14,965,217
|
|
|
|
151,608
|
|
|
|
4.02
|
|
|
|
14,326,630
|
|
|
|
147,487
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds
|
|
|
30,065,217
|
|
|
|
305,783
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
|
|
|
28,373,258
|
|
|
|
292,256
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
52,077,033
|
|
|
|
418,708
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
44,629,479
|
|
|
|
426,239
|
|
|
|
3.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
542,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
587,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
330,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
873,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
52,950,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,501,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,228,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,787,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders
Equity
|
|
$
|
58,178,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,289,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/net interest rate spread (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
325,457
|
|
|
|
2.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
255,078
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets/net interest margin (3)
|
|
$
|
5,033,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,890,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of interest-earning assets to
interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
x
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount includes deferred loan costs and non-performing loans and is net of the allowance for
loan losses.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Determined by subtracting the annualized weighted average cost of total interest-bearing
liabilities from the annualized weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Determined by dividing annualized net interest income by total average interest-earning assets.
|
Page 27
General.
Net income was $135.1 million for the third quarter of 2009, an increase of $13.2
million, or 10.8%, compared with net income of $121.9 million for the third quarter of 2008. Basic
and diluted earnings per common share were $0.28 and $0.27, respectively, for the third quarter of
2009 as compared to $0.25 for both basic and diluted earnings per share for the third quarter of
2008. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, our annualized return on average shareholders
equity was 10.34%, compared with 10.19% for the corresponding period in 2008. Our annualized return
on average assets for the third quarter of 2009 was 0.93% as compared to 0.97% for the third
quarter of 2008. The increase in the annualized return on average equity is primarily due to the
increase in net income during the third quarter of 2009.
Interest and Dividend Income.
Total interest and dividend income for the third quarter of 2009
increased $62.9 million, or 9.2%, to $744.2 million as compared to $681.3 million for the third
quarter of 2008. The increase in total interest and dividend income was primarily due to a $7.59
billion, or 15.3%, increase in the average balance of total interest-earning assets to $57.11
billion for the third quarter of 2009 as compared to $49.52 billion for the third quarter of 2008.
The increase in the average balance of total interest-earning assets was partially offset by a
decrease of 29 basis points in the annualized weighted-average yield on total interest-earning
assets to 5.21% for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 from 5.50% for the same quarter in 2008.
Interest on first mortgage loans increased $29.8 million to $424.5 million for the third quarter of
2009 as compared to $394.7 million for the same quarter in 2008. This was primarily due to a $3.01
billion increase in the average balance of first mortgage loans, which reflected our continued
emphasis on the growth of our mortgage loan portfolio and an increase in mortgage originations due
to refinancing activity caused by market interest rates that are at near-historic lows. The
increase in the average balance of first mortgage loans was partially offset by an 18 basis point
decrease in the weighted-average yield to 5.58% for the third quarter of 2009 from 5.76% for the
third quarter of 2008. The decrease in the average yield earned was due to lower market interest
rates on mortgage products and also due to the continued mortgage refinancing activity. During the
first nine months of 2009, existing mortgage customers refinanced or modified approximately $2.08
billion in mortgage loans with a weighted average rate of 6.21% to a new weighted average rate of
5.42%. We allow existing customers to modify their mortgage loans, for a fee, with the intent of
maintaining our customer relationship in periods of extensive refinancing due to a low interest
rate environment. The modification changes the existing interest rate to the market rate for a
product currently offered by us with a similar or reduced term. We generally do not extend the
maturity date of the loan. To qualify for a modification, the loan should be current and our
review of past payment performance should indicate that no payments were past due in any of the 12
preceding months. In general, all other terms and conditions of the existing mortgage remain the
same.
Interest on consumer and other loans decreased $1.0 million to $5.2 million for the third quarter
of 2009 from $6.2 million for the third quarter of 2008. The average balance of consumer and other
loans decreased $49.2 million to $369.6 million for the third quarter of 2009 as compared to $418.8
million for the third quarter of 2008 and the average yield earned decreased 33 basis points to
5.64% as compared to 5.97% for the same respective periods.
Interest on mortgage-backed securities increased $18.5 million to $243.8 million for the third
quarter of 2009 as compared to $225.3 million for the third quarter of 2008. This increase was due
primarily to a $2.65 billion increase in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities to
$19.94 billion for the third quarter of 2009 as compared to $17.29 billion for the third quarter of
2008, partially offset by a 32 basis point decrease in the weighted-average yield to 4.89% for the
third quarter of 2009 as compared to 5.21% for the same period in 2008.
Page 28
The increase in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities provides us with a source of cash
flow from monthly principal and interest payments. The decrease in the weighted average yield on
mortgage-backed securities is a result of lower yields on securities purchased during the second
half of 2008 and the first nine months of 2009 when market interest rates were lower than the yield
earned on the existing portfolio as well as the repricing of our variable-rate securities.
Interest on investment securities increased $16.3 million to $58.0 million during the third quarter
of 2009 as compared to $41.7 million for the third quarter of 2008. This increase was due
primarily to a $1.63 billion increase in the average balance of investment securities to $5.00
billion for the third quarter of 2009 from $3.37 billion for the third quarter of 2008. This
increase was partially offset by a decrease of 31 basis points in the weighted-average yield to
4.64%.
Dividends on FHLB stock decreased $229,000, or 1.8%, to $12.3 million for the third quarter of 2009
as compared to $12.5 million for the third quarter of 2008. The decrease was due to a 46 basis
point decrease in the average yield to 5.59% as compared to 6.05% for the third quarter of 2008.
This decrease was partially offset by a $51.4 million increase in the average balance to $878.8
million for the third quarter of 2009 as compared to $827.4 million for the same quarter in 2008.
We cannot predict the future amount of dividends that the FHLB may pay or the timing and extent of
any changes in the dividend yield.
Interest Expense.
Total interest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 decreased
$7.5 million, or 1.8%, to $418.7 million as compared to $426.2 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008. This decrease was primarily due to a 61 basis point decrease in the
weighted-average cost of total interest-bearing liabilities to 3.19% for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 compared with 3.80% for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The decrease was
partially offset by a $7.45 billion, or 16.7%, increase in the average balance of total
interest-bearing liabilities to $52.08 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared
with $44.63 billion for the third quarter of 2008. This increase in interest-bearing liabilities
was primarily used to fund asset growth.
Interest expense on our time deposit accounts decreased $13.7 million to $86.5 million for the
third quarter of 2009 as compared to $100.2 million for the third quarter of 2008. This decrease
was due to a decrease in the annualized weighted-average cost of 125 basis points to 2.24% for the
third quarter of 2009 from 3.49% for the third quarter of 2008. This decrease was partially offset
by a $3.87 billion
increase in the average balance of time deposit accounts to $15.31 billion for the third quarter of
2009 from $11.44 billion for the third quarter of 2008. Interest expense on money market accounts
decreased $2.5 million to $17.6 million for the third quarter of 2009 as compared to $20.1 million
for the same quarter in 2008. This decrease was due to a 152 basis point decrease in the
annualized weighted-average cost to 1.70%, partially offset by a $1.63 billion increase in the
average balance to $4.11 billion. Interest expense on our interest-bearing transaction accounts
decreased $4.8 million to $7.4 million for the third quarter of 2009 from $12.2 million for the
same period in 2008. The decrease is due to a 144 basis point decrease in the annualized
weighted-average cost to 1.59%, partially offset by a $222.0 million increase in the average
balance to $1.83 billion.
The increases in the average balances of interest-bearing deposits reflect our strategy to expand
our branch network and to grow deposits in our existing branches by offering competitive rates.
Also, in response to the economic recession, households have increased their personal savings. The
U.S. household savings rate increased to an average of 4.10% for the first eight months of 2009 as
compared to 2.25% for the same period in 2008. We believe that this increase in the household
savings rate has
Page 29
contributed to our growth in deposits. The decrease in the average cost of
deposits for the third quarter of 2009 reflected lower market interest rates. At September 30,
2009, time deposits scheduled to mature within one year totaled $13.93 billion with an average cost
of 2.06%. These time deposits are scheduled to mature as follows: $5.22 billion with an average
cost of 1.97% in the fourth quarter of 2009, $4.65 billion with an average cost of 2.07% in the
first quarter of 2010, $2.63 billion with an average cost of 2.22% in the second quarter of 2010
and $1.43 billion with an average cost of 2.01% in the third quarter of 2010. The current rates
for our six month and one year time deposits are 1.40% and 1.75%, respectively. Based on our
deposit retention experience and current pricing strategy, we anticipate that a significant portion
of these time deposits will remain with us as renewed time deposits or as transfers to other
deposit products at prevailing rates.
Interest expense on borrowed funds increased $13.5 million to $305.8 million for the third quarter
of 2009 as compared to $292.3 million for the third quarter of 2008 primarily due to a $1.69
billion increase in the average balance of borrowed funds to $30.07 billion partially offset by a 6
basis point decrease in the annualized weighted-average cost of borrowed funds to 4.04%.
Borrowed funds were used to fund a significant portion of the growth in interest-earning assets
during 2008. We have been able to fund substantially all of our 2009 growth with deposits. We
anticipate that we will be able to continue to use deposit growth to fund our asset growth,
however, we may use borrowings as a supplemental funding source if deposit growth decreases. The
decrease in the average cost of borrowings for the third quarter of 2009 reflected new borrowings
in 2009 and 2008, when market interest rates were lower than existing borrowings and borrowings
that matured. Substantially all of our borrowings are callable quarterly at the discretion of the
lender after an initial non-call period of one to five years with a final maturity of ten years.
At September 30, 2009, we had $22.13 billion of borrowed funds with a weighted-average rate of
4.17% and with call dates within one year. We anticipate that none of the borrowings will be
called during the next twelve months assuming that market interest rates remain at current levels
or increase modestly. During the third quarter of 2009, we modified $350.0 million of borrowings
to extend the call dates of the borrowings by between two and four years. See Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
Net Interest Income.
Net interest income increased $70.4 million, or 27.6%, to $325.5 million
for the third quarter of 2009 compared with $255.1 million for the third quarter of 2008. Our net
interest rate spread increased 32 basis points to 2.02% for the third quarter of 2009 from 1.70%
for the same quarter in
2008. Our net interest margin increased 22 basis points to 2.30% for the third quarter of 2009 from
2.08% for the same quarter in 2008.
The increase in our net interest margin and net interest rate spread was primarily due to the
decrease in the weighted-average cost of interest-bearing liabilities
.
The yield curve steepened
during 2009, with short-term rates decreasing while longer-term rates increased slightly. While
long-term rates have increased slightly, market rates on mortgage loans remain at near-historic
lows, resulting in increased refinancing activity which resulted in a decrease in the yield we
earned on mortgage-related assets. However, we were able to reduce deposit costs to a greater
extent than the decrease in mortgage yields thereby increasing our net interest rate spread and net
interest margin.
Provision for Loan Losses.
The provision for loan losses amounted to $40.0 million for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $5.0 million for the quarter ended September 30,
2008. The allowance for loan losses (ALL) amounted to $114.8 million and $49.8 million at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. We recorded our provision for loan losses
during the first nine months of 2009 based on our ALL methodology that considers a number of
quantitative and qualitative
Page 30
factors, including the amount of non-performing loans, conditions in
the real estate and housing markets, current economic conditions, particularly increasing levels of
unemployment, and growth in the loan portfolio. See Critical Accounting Policies Allowance for
Loan Losses.
Our primary lending emphasis is the origination and purchase of one- to four-family first mortgage
loans on residential properties and, to a lesser extent, second mortgage loans on one- to
four-family residential properties. Our loan growth is primarily concentrated in one- to
four-family mortgage loans with original loan-to-value (LTV) ratios of less than 80%. The
average LTV ratio of our 2009 first mortgage loan originations and our total first mortgage loan
portfolio were 59.6% and 61.8%, respectively using the appraised value at the time of origination.
The value of the property used as collateral for our loans is dependent upon local market
conditions. As part of our estimation of the allowance for loan losses, we monitor changes in the
values of homes in each market using indices published by various organizations. Based on our
analysis of the data for the third quarter of 2009, we concluded that home values in the Northeast
quadrant of the United States, where most of our lending activity occurs, have continued to decline
from 2008 levels, as evidenced by reduced levels of sales, increasing inventories of houses on the
market, declining house prices and an increase in the length of time houses remain on the market.
However, the rate of decline in home values decreased during the third quarter of 2009.
We define the Northeast quadrant of the country generally as those states that are east of the
Mississippi River and as far south as South Carolina. At September 30, 2009, approximately 73.0%
of our total loans were in the New York metropolitan area. Additionally, the states of Virginia,
Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Michigan and Pennsylvania accounted for 4.8%, 3.8%,
3.7%, 2.7%, 1.6%, 1.4% and 1.8%, respectively, of total loans. The remaining 7.2% of the loan
portfolio is secured by real estate primarily in the remainder of the Northeast quadrant of the
United States. With respect to our non-performing loans, approximately 67.7% are in the New York
metropolitan area and 4.9%, 5.1%, 5.2%, 2.1%, 2.6%, 4.1% and 1.8% are located in the states of
Virginia, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Michigan and Pennsylvania, respectively.
The remaining 6.5% of our non-performing loans are secured by real estate primarily in the
remainder of the Northeast quadrant of the United States.
The national economy has been in a recessionary cycle for approximately 2 years with the housing
and real estate markets suffering significant losses in value. The faltering economy has been
marked by contractions in the availability of business and consumer credit, increases in corporate
borrowing rates, falling home prices, increasing home foreclosures and rising levels of
unemployment. Economic
conditions have improved slightly during the third quarter of 2009 although unemployment rates
continue to increase. We continue to closely monitor the local and national real estate markets
and other factors related to risks inherent in our loan portfolio. We determined the provision for
loan losses for the third quarter of 2009 based on our evaluation of the foregoing factors, the
growth of the loan portfolio, the recent increases in delinquent loans, non-performing loans and
net loan charge-offs, and the increasing trend in the unemployment rate.
At September 30, 2009, first mortgage loans secured by one-to four-family properties accounted for
98.7% of total loans. Fixed-rate mortgage loans represent 74.4% of our first mortgage loans.
Compared to adjustable-rate loans, fixed-rate loans possess less inherent credit risk since loan
payments do not change in response to changes in interest rates. In addition, we do not originate
or purchase loans with payment options, negative amortization loans or sub-prime loans.
Included in our loan portfolio at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are interest-only loans
of approximately $4.15 billion and $3.47 billion, respectively. These loans are originated as
adjustable rate mortgage loans with initial terms of five, seven or ten years with the
interest-only portion of the payment
Page 31
based upon the initial loan term, or offered on a 30-year
fixed-rate loan, with interest-only payments for the first 10 years of the obligation. At the end
of the initial 5-, 7- or 10-year interest-only period, the loan payment will adjust to include both
principal and interest and will amortize over the remaining term so the loan will be repaid at the
end of its original life. These loans are underwritten using the fully-amortizing payment amount.
We had $88.6 million and $16.6 million of non-performing interest-only loans at September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Non-performing loans amounted to $517.6 million at September 30, 2009 as compared to $217.6 million
at December 31, 2008. Non-performing loans at September 30, 2009 included $505.2 million of one-
to four-family first mortgage loans as compared to $207.0 million at December 31, 2008. The ratio
of non-performing loans to total loans was 1.66% at September 30, 2009 compared with 0.74% at
December 31, 2008. Loans delinquent 60 to 89 days amounted to $143.2 million at September 30, 2009
as compared to $104.7 million at December 31, 2008. Foreclosed real estate amounted to $12.8
million at September 30, 2009 as compared to $15.5 million at December 31, 2008. As a result of
our underwriting policies, our borrowers typically have a significant amount of equity, at the time
of origination, in the underlying real estate that we use as collateral for our loans. Due to the
steady deterioration of real estate values, the LTV ratios based on appraisals obtained at time of
origination do not necessarily indicate the extent to which we may incur a loss on any given loan
that may go into foreclosure.
As a result of the increase in non-performing loans, the ratio of the ALL to non-performing loans
decreased from 102.09% at December 31, 2006 to 22.19% at September 30, 2009. During this same
period, the ratio of the ALL to total loans increased from 0.17% to 0.37%. Historically, our
non-performing loans have been a negligible percentage of our total loan portfolio and, as a
result, our ratio of the ALL to non-performing loans was high and did not serve as a reasonable
measure of the adequacy of our ALL. The decline in the ratio of the ALL to non-performing loans
is not, absent other factors, an indication of the adequacy of the ALL since there is not
necessarily a direct relationship between changes in various asset quality ratios and changes in
the ALL and non-performing loans. In the current economic environment, a loan generally becomes
non-performing when the borrower experiences financial difficulty. In many cases, the borrower
also has a second mortgage or home equity loan on the property. In substantially all of these
cases, we do not hold the second mortgage or home equity loan as this is not a business we have
actively pursued.
While any first mortgage loan in our portfolio remains non-performing until final disposition
through foreclosure, the Companys losses to date have been modest due to our first lien position
and relatively low average LTV ratios. We generally obtain new collateral values for loans after
180 days of delinquency. If the estimated fair value of the collateral (less estimated selling
costs) is less than the recorded investment in the loan, we charge-off an amount to reduce the
loan to the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs. As a result, certain
losses inherent in our non-performing loans are being recognized as charge-offs which may result
in a lower ratio of the ALL to non-performing loans when accompanied by a concurrent increase in
total non-performing loans (i.e. due to the addition of new non-performing loans). Charge-offs
amounted to $4.5 million, consisting of 47 loans, in 2008 and $27.5 million, consisting of 330
loans, for the first nine months of 2009. These charge-offs were primarily due to the results of
our reappraisal process for our non-performing residential first mortgage loans with only 40
loans disposed of through the foreclosure process during the first nine months of 2009 with a
final loss on sale (after previous charge-offs) of $286,000. The results of our reappraisal
process and our recent charge-off history are also considered in the determination of the ALL.
At September 30, 2009 the average LTV ratio (using appraised values at the time of origination)
of our non-performing loans was 71.5% and was 61.8% for our total mortgage loan portfolio. Thus,
the ratio
Page 32
of the ALL to non-performing loans needs to be viewed in the context of the underlying
LTVs of the non-performing loans and the relative decline in home values.
As part of our estimation of the ALL, we monitor changes in the values of homes in each market
using indices published by various organizations including the Office of Federal Housing
Enterprise Oversight and Case-Shiller. Our Asset Quality Committee (AQC) uses these indices
and a stratification of our loan portfolio by state as part of its quarterly determination of the
ALL. We do not apply different loss factors based on geographic locations since, at September
30, 2009, 73.0% of our loan portfolio and 67.7% of our non-performing loans are located in the
New York metropolitan area. In addition, we obtain updated collateral values when a loan becomes
180 days past due which we believe identifies potential charge-offs more accurately than a house
price index that is based on a wide geographic area and includes many different types of houses.
However, we use the house price indices to identify geographic areas experiencing weaknesses in
housing markets to determine if an overall adjustment to the ALL is required based on loans we
have in those geographic areas and to determine if changes in the loss factors used in the ALL
quantitative analysis are necessary. Our quantitative analysis of the ALL accounts for increases
in non-performing loans by applying progressively higher risk factors to loans as they become
more delinquent.
Due to the nature of our loan portfolio, our evaluation of the adequacy of our ALL is performed
primarily on a pooled basis. Each month we prepare an analysis which categorizes the entire
loan portfolio by certain risk characteristics such as loan type (one- to four-family,
multi-family, commercial, construction, etc.), loan source (originated or purchased) and payment
status (i.e., current or number of days delinquent). Loans with known potential losses are
categorized separately. We assign potential loss factors to the payment status categories on the
basis of our assessment of the potential risk inherent in each loan type. These factors are
periodically reviewed for appropriateness giving consideration to charge-off history, delinquency
trends, portfolio growth and the status of the regional economy and housing market, in order to
ascertain that the loss factors cover probable and estimable losses inherent in the portfolio.
Based on our recent loss experience on non-performing loans, we increased the loss factors used
in our quantitative analysis of the ALL for certain loan types during the third quarter of 2009.
In addition to our quantitative systematic methodology, we also use qualitative analyses to
determine the adequacy of our ALL. Our qualitative analyses include further evaluation of economic
factors, such as
trends in the unemployment rate, as well as a ratio analysis to evaluate the overall measurement of
the ALL. This analysis includes a review of delinquency ratios, net charge-off ratios and the
ratio of the ALL to both non-performing loans and total loans. This qualitative review is used to
reassess the overall determination of the ALL and to ensure that directional changes in the ALL and
the provision for loan losses are supported by relevant internal and external data.
We consider the average LTV of our non-performing loans and our total portfolio in relation to the
overall changes in house prices in our lending markets when determining the ALL. This provides us
with a macro indication of the severity of potential losses that might be expected. Since
substantially all our portfolio consists of first mortgage loans on residential properties, the LTV
is particularly important to us when a loan becomes non-performing. The weighted average LTV in
our one- to four-family mortgage loan portfolio at September 30, 2009 was 61.8%, using appraised
values at the time of origination. The average LTV ratio of our non-performing loans was 71.5% at
September 30, 2009. Based on the valuation indices, house prices have declined in the New York
metropolitan area, where 67.7% of our non-performing loans were located at September 30, 2009, by
approximately 20% from the peak of the market in 2006 through June 2009 and by 30% nationwide
during that period. Accordingly, despite the
Page 33
worsening economic conditions in the marketplace in
terms of job losses and resulting increased delinquencies, our low average LTV at origination
compared to the decline in housing prices indicates that our expected future loss experience on
loans that are charged-off should remain consistent with our historical experience. However, there
can be no assurance whether significant further declines in house values may occur and result in
higher loss experience and increased levels of charge-offs and loan loss provisions.
Net charge-offs amounted to $13.2 million for the third quarter of 2009 as compared to net
charge-offs of $1.4 million for the corresponding period in 2008. Our charge-offs on
non-performing loans have historically been low due to the amount of underlying equity in the
properties collateralizing our first mortgage loans. Until this current recessionary cycle, it was
our experience that as a non-performing loan approached foreclosure, the borrower sold the
underlying property or, if there was a second mortgage or other subordinated lien, the subordinated
lien holder would purchase the property to protect their interest thereby resulting in the full
payment of principal and interest to Hudson City Savings. This process normally took approximately
12 months. However, due to the unprecedented level of foreclosures and the desire by most states
to slow the foreclosure process, we are now experiencing a time frame to repayment or foreclosure
ranging from 24 to 30 months from the initial non-performing period. As real estate prices
continue to decline, this extended time may result in further charge-offs. In addition, current
conditions in the housing market have made it more difficult for borrowers to sell homes to satisfy
the mortgage and second lien holders are less likely to repay our loan if the value of the property
is not enough to satisfy their loan. We continue to monitor closely the property values underlying
our non-performing loans during this timeframe and take appropriate charge-offs when the loan
balances exceed the underlying property values.
At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, commercial and construction loans evaluated for
impairment in accordance with FASB guidance amounted to $10.8 million and $9.5 million,
respectively. Based on this evaluation, we established an ALL of $2.1 million for loans classified
as impaired at September 30, 2009 compared to $818,000 at December 31, 2008.
Although we believe that we have established and maintained the ALL at adequate levels, additions
may be necessary if future economic and other conditions differ substantially from the current
operating environment. However, the markets in which we lend have experienced significant declines
in real estate values which we have taken into account in evaluating our ALL. No assurance can be
given in any
particular case that our LTV ratios will provide full protection in the event of borrower default.
Although we use the best information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains
an estimate that is subject to significant judgment and short-term change. See Critical
Accounting Policies.
Non-Interest Income.
Total non-interest income was $2.5 million for the third quarter 2009 as
compared to $2.2 million for the same quarter in 2008. Non-interest income primarily consists of
service charges on loans and deposits.
Non-Interest Expense.
Total non-interest expense increased $13.5 million, or 27.3%, to $62.9
million for the third quarter of 2009 from $49.4 million for the third quarter of 2008. The
increase is primarily due to increases of $10.0 million in Federal deposit insurance expense, $2.0
million in compensation and employee benefits expense and $1.2 million in other non-interest
expense.
The increase in Federal deposit insurance expense is due primarily to the increases in our deposit
insurance assessment rate to 18 basis points of deposits from 5 basis points as a result of a
restoration plan implemented by the FDIC to recapitalize the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). On
September 29, 2009,
Page 34
the FDIC published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would require insured
institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of
2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. If the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is adopted, we
expect that we may be required to prepay an estimated $150.5 million on December 30, 2009 for our
fourth quarter of 2009 and all of 2010, 2011 and 2012 FDIC assessments. The FDIC also voted to
adopt a uniform three-basis point increase in assessment rates effective on January 1, 2011.
The increase in compensation and employee benefits expense included a $2.3 million increase in
compensation costs, due primarily to normal increases in salary as well as additional full time
employees, a $759,000 increase in pension costs and a $282,000 increase in costs related to our
health plan. These increases were partially offset by a $1.4 million decrease in expense related
to our stock benefit plans. This decrease was due primarily to a decrease in ESOP expense as a
result of changes in the price of our common stock during 2009. At September 30, 2009, we had
1,483 full-time equivalent employees as compared to 1,406 at September 30, 2008. Included in other
non-interest expense for the third quarter of 2009 were write-downs on foreclosed real estate and
net losses on the sale of foreclosed real estate of $481,000 as compared to $516,000 for the third
quarter of 2008
.
Our efficiency ratio was 19.18% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to 19.21%
for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Our annualized ratio of non-interest expense to
average total assets for the third quarter of 2009 was 0.43% as compared to 0.39% for the third
quarter of 2008.
Income Taxes.
Income tax expense amounted to $90.0 million for the three months ended September
30, 2009 compared with $80.9 million for the corresponding period in 2008. Our effective tax rate
for the third quarter of 2009 was 39.98% compared with 39.90% for the third quarter of 2008.
Page 35
Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Average Balance Sheet.
The following table presents the average balance sheets, average yields
and costs and certain other information for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. The
table presents the annualized average yield on interest-earning assets and the annualized average
cost of interest-bearing liabilities. We derived the yields and costs by dividing annualized
income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities, respectively, for the periods shown. We derived average balances from daily balances
over the periods indicated. Interest income includes fees that we considered to be adjustments to
yields. Yields on tax-exempt obligations were not computed on a tax equivalent basis. Nonaccrual
loans were included in the computation of average balances and therefore have a zero yield. The
yields set forth below include the effect of deferred loan origination fees and costs, and purchase
discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earnings assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans, net (1)
|
|
$
|
29,832,820
|
|
|
$
|
1,252,011
|
|
|
|
5.60
|
%
|
|
$
|
25,742,402
|
|
|
$
|
1,110,121
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
Consumer and other loans
|
|
|
385,774
|
|
|
|
16,629
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
426,864
|
|
|
|
19,978
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
|
Federal funds sold and other overnight deposits
|
|
|
460,265
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
236,479
|
|
|
|
4,093
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities at amortized cost
|
|
|
19,738,127
|
|
|
|
743,207
|
|
|
|
5.02
|
|
|
|
16,105,296
|
|
|
|
632,226
|
|
|
|
5.23
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
876,773
|
|
|
|
30,698
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
774,729
|
|
|
|
40,729
|
|
|
|
7.01
|
|
Investment securities, at amortized cost
|
|
|
4,294,557
|
|
|
|
151,994
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
|
|
|
3,681,122
|
|
|
|
134,118
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
55,588,316
|
|
|
|
2,195,246
|
|
|
|
5.27
|
|
|
|
46,966,892
|
|
|
|
1,941,265
|
|
|
|
5.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-earnings assets
|
|
|
1,006,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
775,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
56,595,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
47,742,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
$
|
740,889
|
|
|
|
4,179
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
731,732
|
|
|
|
4,132
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction accounts
|
|
|
1,732,510
|
|
|
|
24,459
|
|
|
|
1.89
|
|
|
|
1,590,125
|
|
|
|
36,937
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
3,498,955
|
|
|
|
50,564
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
2,107,569
|
|
|
|
52,577
|
|
|
|
3.33
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
14,464,413
|
|
|
|
295,801
|
|
|
|
2.73
|
|
|
|
11,270,239
|
|
|
|
339,752
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
20,436,767
|
|
|
|
375,003
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
15,699,665
|
|
|
|
433,398
|
|
|
|
3.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
15,100,295
|
|
|
|
457,252
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
|
|
12,986,768
|
|
|
|
407,630
|
|
|
|
4.19
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances
|
|
|
15,076,250
|
|
|
|
451,306
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
13,468,861
|
|
|
|
418,712
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds
|
|
|
30,176,545
|
|
|
|
908,558
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
|
|
|
26,455,629
|
|
|
|
826,342
|
|
|
|
4.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
50,613,312
|
|
|
|
1,283,561
|
|
|
|
3.39
|
|
|
|
42,155,294
|
|
|
|
1,259,740
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
537,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
562,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
324,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
861,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
843,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
51,475,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,998,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,120,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,744,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
56,595,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
47,742,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/net interest rate spread (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
911,685
|
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
681,525
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets/net interest margin (3)
|
|
$
|
4,975,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,811,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of interest-earning assets to
interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
x
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount includes deferred loan costs and non-performing loans and is net of the allowance for
loan losses.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Determined by subtracting the annualized weighted average cost of total interest-bearing
liabilities from the annualized weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Determined by dividing annualized net interest income by total average interest-earning assets.
|
Page 36
General.
Net income was $390.7 million for the first nine months of 2009, an increase of $69.4
million, or 21.6%, compared with net income of $321.3 million for the first nine months of 2008.
Basic and diluted earnings per common share were both $0.80 for the first nine months of 2009 as
compared to basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.66 and $0.65, respectively, for the first
nine months of 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, our annualized return on average
shareholders equity was 10.17%, compared with 9.03% for the corresponding period in 2008. Our
annualized return on average assets for the first nine months of 2009 was 0.92% as compared to
0.90% for the first nine months of 2008. The increase in the annualized return on average equity
and assets is primarily due to the increase in net income during the first nine months of 2009.
Interest and Dividend Income.
Total interest and dividend income for the first nine months of
2009 increased $254.0 million, or 13.1%, to $2.20 billion as compared to $1.94 billion for the
first nine months of 2008. The increase in total interest and dividend income was primarily due to
an $8.62 billion, or 18.4%, increase in the average balance of total interest-earning assets to
$55.59 billion for the first nine months of 2009 as compared to $46.97 billion for the first nine
months of 2008. The increase in the average balance of total interest-earning assets was partially
offset by a decrease of 24 basis points in the annualized weighted-average yield on total
interest-earning assets to 5.27% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 5.51% for the
comparable period in 2008.
Interest on first mortgage loans increased $141.9 million, or 12.8%, to $1.25 billion for the first
nine months of 2009 as compared to $1.11 billion for the same period in 2008. This was primarily
due to a $4.09 billion increase in the average balance of first mortgage loans to $29.83 billion
during the first nine
months of 2009, which reflected our continued emphasis on the growth of our mortgage loan portfolio
and an increase in mortgage originations due to the refinancing activity caused by market interest
rates that are at near-historic lows. The increase in first mortgage loan income was partially
offset by a 15 basis point decrease in the weighted-average yield to 5.60% for the first nine
months of 2009 as compared to 5.75% for the same period in 2008. The decrease in the average yield
earned was due to lower market interest rates on mortgage products and also due to the continued
mortgage refinancing activity. During the first nine months of 2009, existing mortgage customers
refinanced approximately $2.08 billion in mortgage loans with a weighted average rate of 6.21% to a
new rate of 5.42%.
Interest on consumer and other loans decreased $3.4 million to $16.6 million for the first nine
months of 2009 from $20.0 million for the first nine months of 2008. The average balance of
consumer and other loans decreased $41.1 million to $385.8 million for the first nine months of
2009 as compared to $426.9 million for the first nine months of 2008 and the average yield earned
decreased 49 basis points to 5.75% as compared to 6.24% for the same respective periods.
Interest on mortgage-backed securities increased $111.0 million, or 17.6%, to $743.2 million for
the first nine months of 2009 as compared to $632.2 million for the first nine months of 2008.
This increase was due primarily to a $3.63 billion increase in the average balance of
mortgage-backed securities to $19.74 billion during the first nine months of 2009 as compared to
$16.11 billion for the first nine months of 2008, partially offset by a 21 basis point decrease in
the weighted-average yield to 5.02% as compared to 5.23% for the same respective periods.
The increase in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities is due to our purchase of these
securities which provide us with a source of cash flow from monthly principal and interest
payments. The decrease in the weighted average yield on mortgage-backed securities is a result of
lower yields on securities purchased during the second half of 2008 and the first nine months of
2009 when market
Page 37
interest rates were lower than the yield earned on the existing portfolio as well
as the repricing of our variable-rate securities.
Interest on investment securities increased $17.9 million to $152.0 million during the first nine
months of 2009 as compared to $134.1 million for the first nine months of 2008. This increase was
due primarily to a $613.4 million increase in the average balance of investment securities to $4.29
billion for the first nine months of 2009 from $3.68 billion for the first nine months of 2008.
The impact on interest income from the increase in the average balance of investment securities was
partially offset by a decrease in the average yield of investment securities of 14 basis points to
4.72%.
Dividends on FHLB stock decreased $10.0 million, or 24.6%, to $30.7 million for the first nine
months of 2009 as compared to $40.7 million for the first nine months of 2008. The decrease was
due primarily to a 234 basis point decrease in the average yield to 4.67% as compared to 7.01% for
the first nine months of 2008. The decrease in the average yield earned was partially offset by a
$102.1 million increase in the average balance to $876.8 million for the first nine months of 2009
as compared to $774.7 million for the same period in 2008. We cannot predict the future amount of
dividends that the FHLB may pay or the timing and extent of any changes in the dividend yield.
Interest Expense.
Total interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 increased
$23.8 million, or 1.9%, to $1.28 billion as compared to $1.26 billion for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. This increase was primarily due to an $8.45 billion, or 20.0%, increase in the
average balance of total interest-bearing liabilities to $50.61 billion for the first nine months
of 2009 compared with $42.16 billion for the corresponding period in 2008. The increase in the
average balance of total interest-bearing liabilities was partially offset by a 60 basis point decrease in the weighted-average cost
of total interest-bearing liabilities to 3.39% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared with 3.99% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Interest expense on our time deposit accounts decreased $44.0 million to $295.8 million for the
first nine months of 2009 as compared to $339.8 million for the first nine months of 2008. This
decrease was due to a decrease in the annualized weighted-average cost of 130 basis points to 2.73%
for the first nine months of 2009 from 4.03% for the first nine months of 2008. This decrease was
partially offset by a $3.19 billion increase in the average balance of time deposit accounts to
$14.46 billion for the first nine months of 2009 from $11.27 billion for the first nine months of
2008. Interest expense on money market accounts decreased $2.0 million to $50.6 million for the
first nine months of 2009 as compared to $52.6 million for the same period in 2008. This decrease
was due to a 140 basis point decrease in the annualized weighted-average cost to 1.93%, partially
offset by a $1.39 billion increase in the average balance to $3.50 billion. Interest expense on
our interest-bearing transaction accounts decreased $12.4 million to $24.5 million for the first
nine months of 2009 as compared to $36.9 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease is due
to a 121 basis point decrease in the annualized weighted-average cost to 1.89%, partially offset by
a $142.4 million increase in the average balance to $1.73 billion.
The increases in the average balances of interest-bearing deposits reflect our strategy to expand
our branch network and to grow deposits in our existing branches by offering competitive rates.
Also, in response to the economic recession, households have increased their personal savings. The
U.S. household savings rate increased to an average of 4.10% for the first eight months of 2009 as
compared to 2.25% for the same period in 2008. We believe that this increase in the household
savings rate has contributed to our growth in deposits. The decrease in the average cost of
deposits for the first nine months of 2009 reflected lower market interest rates.
Page 38
Interest expense on borrowed funds increased $82.3 million to $908.6 million for the first nine
months of 2009 as compared to $826.3 million for the first nine months of 2008. This was primarily
due to a $3.72 billion increase in the average balance of borrowed funds to $30.18 billion,
partially offset by a 14 basis point decrease in the annualized weighted-average cost of borrowed
funds to 4.03%.
Borrowed funds were used to fund a significant portion of the growth in interest-earning assets
during 2008. We have been able to fund substantially all of our 2009 growth with deposits. We
anticipate that we will be able to continue to use deposit growth to fund our asset growth,
however, we may use borrowings as a supplemental funding source if deposit growth decreases. The
decrease in the average cost of borrowings for the first nine months of 2009 reflected new
borrowings in 2009 and 2008, when market interest rates were lower than existing borrowings and
borrowings that matured. Substantially all of our borrowings are callable quarterly at the
discretion of the lender after an initial non-call period of one to five years with a final
maturity of ten years. At September 30, 2009, we had $22.13 billion of borrowed funds with a
weighted-average rate of 4.17% and with call dates within one year. We anticipate that none of the
borrowings will be called during the next twelve months assuming that market interest rates remain
at current levels or increase modestly. During the first nine months of 2009, we modified $650.0
million of borrowings to extend the call dates of the borrowings by between two and four years.
See Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Net Interest Income.
Net interest income increased $230.2 million, or 33.8%, to $911.7 million
for the first nine months of 2009 compared to $681.5 million for the first nine months of 2008.
Our net interest rate spread increased 36 basis points to 1.88% for the first nine months of 2009
from 1.52% for the
comparable period in 2008. Our net interest margin increased 25 basis points to 2.18% for the first
nine months of 2009 from 1.93% for the comparable period in 2008.
The increase in our net interest margin and net interest rate spread was primarily due to the
decrease in the weighted-average cost of interest-bearing liabilities
.
The yield curve steepened
during 2009, with short-term rates decreasing slightly while longer-term rates increased.
Notwithstanding the increase in long-term rates, market rates on mortgage loans remain at
near-historic lows, resulting in increased refinancing activity which resulted in a decrease in the
yield we earned on mortgage-related assets. However, we were able to reduce deposit costs to a
greater extent than the decrease in mortgage yields thereby increasing our net interest rate spread
and net interest margin.
Provision for Loan Losses.
The provision for loan losses amounted to $92.5 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $10.5 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008. The ALL amounted to $114.8 million and $49.8 million at September 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively. We recorded our provision for loan losses during the first half of 2009
based on our ALL methodology that considers a number of quantitative and qualitative factors,
including the amount of non-performing loans, which increased to $517.6 million at September 30,
2009 from $217.6 million at December 31, 2008, conditions in the real estate and housing markets,
current economic conditions, particularly increasing levels of unemployment, and growth in the loan
portfolio. See Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 Provision for Loan Losses.
Non-Interest Income.
Total non-interest income was $31.4 million for the first nine months of
2009 as compared to $6.5 million for the same period in 2008. Non-interest income primarily
consists of service charges on loans and deposits. Included in non-interest income for the first
nine months of 2009 were net gains on securities transactions of $24.2 million which resulted
primarily from the sale of $761.6 million
Page 39
of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale.
Proceeds from the securities sale were primarily used to fund the purchase of first mortgage loans
during the second quarter of 2009.
Non-Interest Expense.
Total non-interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
was $202.7 million as compared to $145.8 million during the corresponding 2008 period. The increase
is primarily due to the FDIC special assessment of $21.1 million, a $21.5 million increase in
Federal deposit insurance expense, an $8.3 million increase in compensation and employee benefits
expense, and a $4.1 million increase in other non-interest expense. The special assessment and the
increase in Federal deposit insurance expense are due primarily to the restoration plan implemented
by the FDIC to recapitalize the DIF. The increase in compensation and employee benefits expense
included a $6.1 million increase in compensation costs, due primarily to normal increases in salary
as well as additional full time employees, a $2.6 million increase in pension costs and a $2.9
million increase in costs related to our health plan. These increases were partially offset by a
$3.3 million decrease in expense related to our stock benefit plans. This decrease was due
primarily to a decrease in ESOP expense as a result of changes in the price of our common stock
during the first nine months of 2009. Included in other non-interest expense for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 were write-downs on foreclosed real estate and net losses on the sale of
foreclosed real estate, of $2.0 million as compared to $1.1 million for the comparable period in
2008.
Our efficiency ratio was 21.49% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to 21.21%
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing
non-interest expense by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. Our annualized
ratio of non-interest
expense to average total assets for the first nine months of 2009 was 0.48% as compared to 0.41%
for the first nine months of 2008.
Income Taxes.
Income tax expense amounted to $257.2 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 compared with $210.4 million for the corresponding period in 2008. Our effective tax rate
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 39.70% compared with 39.58% for the same period in
2008.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The term liquidity refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to fund loan
originations, loan and security purchases, deposit withdrawals, repayment of borrowings and
operating expenses. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, the proceeds from
principal and interest payments on loans and mortgage-backed securities, the maturities and calls
of investment securities and funds provided by our operations. Deposit flows, calls of investment
securities and borrowed funds, and prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities are strongly
influenced by interest rates, general and local economic conditions and competition in the
marketplace. These factors reduce the predictability of the receipt of these sources of funds. Our
membership in the FHLB provides us access to additional sources of borrowed funds, which is
generally limited to approximately twenty times the amount of FHLB stock owned. We also have the
ability to access the capital markets from time to time, depending on market conditions.
Our primary investing activities are the origination and purchase of one-to four-family real estate
loans and consumer and other loans, the purchase of mortgage-backed securities, and the purchase of
investment securities. These activities are funded primarily by borrowings, deposit growth and
principal and interest payments on loans, mortgage-backed securities and investment securities. We
originated $4.66 billion and purchased $2.45 billion of loans during the first nine months of 2009
as compared to
Page 40
$4.01 billion and $2.55 billion during the first nine months of 2008. While the
residential real estate markets have slowed during the past year, our competitive rates and an
increase in mortgage refinancing have resulted in increased origination production for the first
nine months of 2009. The increase in refinancing activity occurring in the marketplace has also
caused an increase in principal repayments which amounted to $5.34 billion for the first nine
months of 2009 as compared to
$2.22 billion for the same period in 2008. At September 30, 2009,
commitments to originate and purchase mortgage loans amounted to $469.0 million and $243.1 million,
respectively as compared to $348.5 million and $279.9 million, respectively at September 30, 2008.
Conditions in the secondary mortgage market have made it more difficult for us to purchase loans
that meet our underwriting standards. We expect that the amount of loan purchases may be at
reduced levels for the near-term.
Purchases of mortgage-backed securities during the first nine months of 2009 were $5.01 billion as
compared to $5.47 billion during the first nine months of 2008. The decrease in the purchases of
mortgage-backed securities was due to our ability to utilize deposit growth for increased mortgage
loan production during the first nine months of 2009. In addition, we increased our purchases of
investment securities since the yields on these securities were more attractive than the yields
currently being earned on mortgage-backed securities. We sold $761.6 million of mortgage-backed
securities during the first nine months of 2009, resulting in a gain of $24.0 million. We used the
proceeds from the sales to fund the purchase of first mortgage loans. There were no securities
sales in the first nine months of 2008.
We purchased $4.37 billion of investment securities during the first nine months of 2009 as
compared to $1.90 billion during the first nine months of 2008. Proceeds from the calls of
investment securities
amounted to $2.67 billion during the first nine months of 2009 as compared to $2.71 billion for the
corresponding period in 2008.
During the first nine months of 2009, principal repayments on loans totaled $5.34 billion as
compared to $2.22 billion for the first nine months of 2008. Principal payments on mortgage-backed
securities amounted to $3.43 billion and $1.83 billion for those same respective periods. These
increases in principal repayments were due primarily to the refinancing activity caused by market
interest rates that are at near-historic lows.
As part of the membership requirements of the FHLB, we are required to hold a certain dollar amount
of FHLB common stock based on our mortgage-related assets and borrowings from the FHLB. During the
first nine months of 2009, we purchased a net additional $11.4 million of FHLB common stock
compared with net purchases of $136.5 million during the first nine months of 2008.
Our primary financing activities consist of gathering deposits, engaging in wholesale borrowings,
repurchases of our common stock and the payment of dividends.
Total deposits increased $4.65 billion during the first nine months of 2009 as compared to an
increase of $2.13 billion for the first nine months of 2008. These increases reflect our growth
strategy, competitive pricing and the recent increases in the U.S. household savings rate during
this recessionary economy. Deposit flows are typically affected by the level of market interest
rates, the interest rates and products offered by competitors, the volatility of equity markets,
and other factors. Time deposits scheduled to mature within one year were $13.93 billion at
September 30, 2009. These time deposits have a weighted average rate of 2.06%. We anticipate that
we will have sufficient resources to meet this current funding commitment. Based on our deposit
retention experience and current pricing strategy, we anticipate that a significant portion of
these time deposits will remain with us as renewed time deposits or as transfers to other deposit
products at the prevailing interest rate.
Page 41
During the first nine months of 2009, we also used wholesale borrowings to fund our investing and
financing activities. Principal repayments of borrowed funds totaled $950.0 million, largely
offset by $750.0 million in new borrowings. At September 30, 2009, we had $22.13 billion of
borrowed funds with a weighted-average rate of 4.17% and with call dates within one year. We
anticipate that none of these borrowings will be called assuming current market interest rates
remain stable. We believe, given current market conditions, that the likelihood that a significant
portion of these borrowings would be called will not increase substantially unless interest rates
were to increase by at least 300 basis points. However, in the event borrowings are called, we
anticipate that we will have sufficient resources to meet this funding commitment by borrowing new
funds at the prevailing market interest rate, using funds generated by deposit growth or by using
proceeds from securities sales. In addition, at September 30, 2009 we had $200.0 million of
borrowings with a weighted average rate of 4.71% that are scheduled to mature within one year.
Our borrowings have traditionally consisted of structured callable borrowings with ten year final
maturities and initial non-call periods of one to five years. We have used this type of borrowing
primarily to fund our loan growth because they have a longer duration than shorter-term
non-callable borrowings and have a slightly lower cost than a non-callable borrowing with a
maturity date similar to the initial call date of the callable borrowing. However, during the
first nine months of 2009, we have been able to fund our asset growth with deposit inflows. We
anticipate that we will be able to continue to use deposit growth to fund our asset growth,
however, we may use borrowings as a supplemental funding source if deposit growth decreases. In
order to fund our growth and provide for our liquidity we may borrow a combination of short-term
borrowings with maturities of three to six months and longer term fixed-maturity borrowings with terms of two to five years. Our new borrowings in the first nine months
of 2009 consisted of non-callable borrowings of $400.0 million with maturities of one to three
months and $350.0 million of non-callable borrowings with maturities of two to three years.
Total cash and cash equivalents increased $408.7 million to $670.5 million at September 30, 2009 as
compared to $261.8 million at December 31, 2008. This increase is due to liquidity being provided
by the strong deposit growth and increased repayments on mortgage-related assets. In addition, we
have maintained a higher level of Federal funds sold since other types of short- and medium-term
investments are currently providing relatively low yields.
Cash dividends paid during the first nine months of 2009 were $214.9 million. During the first
nine months of 2009, we purchased 4.0 million shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost of
$43.5 million. At September 30, 2009, there remained 50,123,550 shares available for purchase
under existing stock repurchase programs.
The primary source of liquidity for Hudson City Bancorp, the holding company of Hudson City
Savings, is capital distributions from Hudson City Savings. During the first nine months of 2009,
Hudson City Bancorp received $258.5 million in dividend payments from Hudson City Savings. The
primary use of these funds is the payment of dividends to our shareholders and, when appropriate as
part of our capital management strategy, the repurchase of our outstanding common stock. Hudson
City Bancorps ability to continue these activities is dependent upon capital distributions from
Hudson City Savings. Applicable federal law may limit the amount of capital distributions Hudson
City Savings may make. At September 30, 2009, Hudson City Bancorp had total cash and due from banks
of $215.0 million.
At September 30, 2009, Hudson City Savings exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. Hudson
City Savings tangible capital ratio, leverage (core) capital ratio and total risk-based capital
ratio were 7.66%, 7.66% and 21.27%, respectively.
Page 42
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
We are a party to certain off-balance sheet arrangements, which occur in the normal course of our
business, to meet the credit needs of our customers and the growth initiatives of Hudson City
Savings. These arrangements are primarily commitments to originate and purchase mortgage loans, and
to purchase securities. We are also obligated under a number of non-cancelable operating leases.
The following table reports the amounts of our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1 Year to
|
|
|
3 Years to
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
Contractual Obligation
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
3 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loan originations
|
|
$
|
468,951
|
|
|
$
|
468,951
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Mortgage loan purchases
|
|
|
243,127
|
|
|
|
243,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed security purchases
|
|
|
760,150
|
|
|
|
760,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
149,746
|
|
|
|
8,797
|
|
|
|
17,967
|
|
|
|
17,383
|
|
|
|
105,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,621,974
|
|
|
$
|
1,481,025
|
|
|
$
|
17,967
|
|
|
$
|
17,383
|
|
|
$
|
105,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend money to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments to fund first mortgage loans
generally have fixed expiration dates of approximately 90 days and other termination clauses. Since
some commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do
not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. Hudson City Savings evaluates each customers credit-worthiness
on a case-by-case basis. Additionally, we have available home equity, commercial lines of credit,
and overdraft lines of credit, which do not have fixed expiration dates, of approximately $182.8
million. We are not obligated to advance further amounts on credit lines if the customer is
delinquent, or otherwise in violation of the agreement. The commitments to purchase first mortgage
loans and mortgage-backed securities had a normal period from trade date to settlement date of
approximately 90 days and 60 days, respectively.
Critical Accounting Policies
Note 2 to our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, contains a summary of our significant accounting policies. We believe
our policies with respect to the methodology for our determination of the ALL, the measurement of
stock-based compensation expense and the measurement of the funded status and cost of our pension
and other post-retirement benefit plans involve a higher degree of complexity and require
management to make difficult and subjective judgments which often require assumptions or estimates
about highly uncertain matters. Changes in these judgments, assumptions or estimates could cause
reported results to differ materially. These critical policies and their application are
continually reviewed by management, and are periodically reviewed with the Audit Committee and our
Board of Directors.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The ALL has been determined in accordance with GAAP, under which we are required to maintain an
adequate ALL at September 30, 2009. We are responsible for the timely and periodic determination of
the amount of the allowance required. We believe that our ALL is adequate to cover specifically
identifiable
Page 43
loan losses, as well as estimated losses inherent in our portfolio for which certain
losses are probable but not specifically identifiable.
Our primary lending emphasis is the origination and purchase of one- to four-family first mortgage
loans on residential properties and, to a lesser extent, second mortgage loans on one- to
four-family residential properties resulting in a loan concentration in residential first mortgage
loans at September 30, 2009. As a result of our lending practices, we also have a concentration of
loans secured by real property located primarily in New Jersey, New York and Connecticut. At
September 30, 2009, approximately 73.0% of our total loans are in the New York metropolitan area.
Additionally, the states of Virginia, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Michigan and
Pennsylvania accounted for 4.8%, 3.8%, 3.7%, 2.7%, 1.6%, 1.4% and 1.8%, respectively of total
loans. The remaining 7.2% of the loan portfolio is secured by real estate primarily in the
remainder of the Northeast quadrant of the United States. Based on the composition of our loan
portfolio and the growth in our loan portfolio, we believe the primary risks inherent in our
portfolio are the continued weakened economic conditions due to the recent U.S. recession,
continued high levels of unemployment, rising interest rates in the markets we lend and a
continuing decline in real estate market values. Any one or a combination of these adverse trends
may adversely affect our loan portfolio resulting in increased delinquencies, non-performing
assets, loan losses and future levels of loan loss provisions. We consider these trends in market
conditions in determining the ALL.
Due to the nature of our loan portfolio, our evaluation of the adequacy of our ALL is performed
primarily on a pooled basis. Each month we prepare an analysis which categorizes the entire
loan portfolio by certain risk characteristics such as loan type (one- to four-family,
multi-family, commercial, construction, etc.), loan source (originated or purchased) and payment
status (i.e., current or number of
days delinquent). Loans with known potential losses are categorized separately. We assign
potential loss factors to the payment status categories on the basis of our assessment of the
potential risk inherent in each loan type. These factors are periodically reviewed for
appropriateness giving consideration to charge-off history, delinquency trends, portfolio growth
and the status of the regional economy and housing market, in order to ascertain that the loss
factors cover probable and estimable losses inherent in the portfolio. Based on our recent loss
experience on non-performing loans, we increased the loss factors used in our quantitative
analysis of the ALL for certain loan types during the third quarter of 2009. We use this
analysis, as a tool, together with principal balances and delinquency reports, to evaluate the
adequacy of the ALL. Other key factors we consider in this process are current real estate market
conditions in geographic areas where our loans are located, changes in the trend of
non-performing loans, the results of our foreclosed property transactions, the current state of
the local and national economy, changes in interest rates and loan portfolio growth. Any one or
a combination of these adverse trends may adversely affect our loan portfolio resulting in
increased delinquencies, loan losses and future levels of provisions.
We maintain the ALL through provisions for loan losses that we charge to income. We charge losses
on loans against the ALL when we believe the collection of loan principal is unlikely. We
establish the provision for loan losses after considering the results of our review as described
above. We apply this process and methodology in a consistent manner and we reassess and modify the
estimation methods and assumptions used in response to changing conditions. Such changes, if any,
are approved by our AQC each quarter.
Hudson City Savings defines the population of potential impaired loans to be all non-accrual
construction, commercial real estate and multi-family loans. Impaired loans are individually
assessed to determine that the loans carrying value is not in excess of the fair value of the
collateral or the present value of the
Page 44
loans expected future cash flows. Smaller balance
homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment, such as residential mortgage
loans and consumer loans, are specifically excluded from the impaired loan analysis.
We believe that we have established and maintained the ALL at adequate levels. Additions may be
necessary if future economic and other conditions differ substantially from the current operating
environment. Although management uses the best information available, the level of the ALL remains
an estimate that is subject to significant judgment and short-term change.
Stock-Based Compensation
We recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments
based on the grant-date fair value for all awards granted, modified, repurchased or cancelled after
January 1, 2006 and for the portion of outstanding awards for which the requisite service was not
rendered as of January 1, 2006, in accordance with ASC 718-10. We granted performance-based stock
options in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 that vest if certain financial performance measures are met.
In accordance with ASC 718-10-30-6, we assess the probability of achieving these financial
performance measures and recognize the cost of these performance-based grants if it is probable
that the financial performance measures will be met. This probability assessment is subjective in
nature and may change over the assessment period for the performance measures.
We estimate the per share fair value of option grants on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model using assumptions for the expected dividend yield, expected stock price
volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option term. These assumptions are based on our
analysis of our historical
option exercise experience and our judgments regarding future option exercise experience and market
conditions. These assumptions are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and, therefore,
cannot be determined with precision. The Black-Scholes option pricing model also contains certain
inherent limitations when applied to options that are not traded on public markets.
The per share fair value of options is highly sensitive to changes in assumptions. In general, the
per share fair value of options will move in the same direction as changes in the expected stock
price volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option term, and in the opposite direction
of changes in the expected dividend yield. For example, the per share fair value of options will
generally increase as expected stock price volatility increases, risk-free interest rate increases,
expected option term increases and expected dividend yield decreases. The use of different
assumptions or different option pricing models could result in materially different per share fair
values of options.
Pension and Other Post-retirement Benefit Assumptions
Non-contributory retirement and post-retirement defined benefit plans are maintained for certain
employees, including retired employees hired on or before July 31, 2005 who have met other
eligibility requirements of the plans. We adopted ASC 715,
Retirement Benefits
. This ASC requires
an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial condition an asset for a plans
overfunded status or a liability for a plans underfunded status; (b) measure a plans assets and
its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employers fiscal year; and
(c) recognize, in comprehensive income, changes in the funded status of a defined benefit
post-retirement plan in the year in which the changes occur. The requirement to measure plan
assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employers fiscal year-end statement of
financial condition became effective for the Company on December 31, 2008. We have
Page 45
historically
used our fiscal year-end as the measurement date for plan assets and benefit obligations and
therefore the measurement date provisions of ASC 715 did not affect us.
We provide our actuary with certain rate assumptions used in measuring our benefit obligation. We
monitor these rates in relation to the current market interest rate environment and update our
actuarial analysis accordingly. The most significant of these is the discount rate used to
calculate the period-end present value of the benefit obligations, and the expense to be included
in the following years financial statements. A lower discount rate will result in a higher benefit
obligation and expense, while a higher discount rate will result in a lower benefit obligation and
expense. The discount rate assumption was determined based on a cash flow/yield curve model
specific to our pension and post-retirement plans. We compare this rate to certain market indices,
such as long-term treasury bonds, or the Moodys bond indices, for reasonableness. A discount rate
of 5.75% was selected for the December 31, 2008 measurement date and the 2009 expense calculation.
For our pension plan, we also assumed an annual rate of salary increase of 4.00% for future
periods. This rate is corresponding to actual salary increases experienced over prior years. We
assumed a return on plan assets of 8.25% for future periods. We actuarially determine the return on
plan assets based on actual plan experience over the previous ten years. The actual return on plan
assets was a net loss of 28.2% for 2008. The assumed return on plan assets of 8.25% is based on
expected returns in future periods. Our net loss on plan assets during 2008 is a result of the
current economic recession and conditions in the equity and credit markets. There can be no
assurances with respect to actual return on plan assets in the future. We continually review and
evaluate all actuarial assumptions affecting the pension plan, including assumed return on assets.
For our post-retirement benefit plan, the assumed health care cost trend rate used to measure the
expected cost of other benefits for 2008 was 9.00%. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to
4.75% for 2016
and remain at that level thereafter. Changes to the assumed health care cost trend rate are
expected to have an immaterial impact as we capped our obligations to contribute to the premium
cost of coverage to the post-retirement health benefit plan at the 2007 premium level.
Securities Impairment
Our available-for-sale securities portfolio is carried at estimated fair value with any unrealized
gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income/loss in
shareholders equity. Debt securities which we have the positive intent and ability to hold to
maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and are carried at amortized cost. The fair values for
our securities are obtained from an independent nationally recognized pricing service.
Substantially all of our securities portfolio is comprised of mortgage-backed securities and debt
securities issued by a GSE. The fair value of these securities is primarily impacted by changes in
interest rates. We generally view changes in fair value caused by changes in interest rates as
temporary, which is consistent with our experience. We conduct a periodic review and evaluation of
the securities portfolio to determine if a decline in the fair value of any security below its cost
basis is other-than-temporary. Our evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment considers the
duration and severity of the impairment, our intent and ability to hold the securities and our
assessments of the reason for the decline in value and the likelihood of a near-term
recovery. If we intend to sell the debt security, an other-than-temporary impairment is
considered to have occurred. In addition, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have
occurred if it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before
recovery of its amortized cost. Other-than-temporary impairments that are attributable to credit
losses are to be
Page 46
recognized in income with the remaining decline in the fair value of a security
recognized in other comprehensive income.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risk is presented as of December 31, 2008 in
Hudson City Bancorps Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following is an update of the discussion
provided therein.
General
As a financial institution, our primary component of market risk is interest rate volatility. Our
net income is primarily based on net interest income, and fluctuations in interest rates will
ultimately impact the level of both income and expense recorded on a large portion of our assets
and liabilities. Fluctuations in interest rates will also affect the market value of all
interest-earning assets, other than those that possess a short term to maturity.
The difference between rates on the yield curve, or the shape of the yield curve, impacts our net
interest income. The FOMC noted that there is evidence that the pace of economic contraction has
slowed since April 2009. However, the national unemployment rate increased to 9.8% in September
2009 as compared to 9.5% in June 2009 and 7.2% in December 2008. Lower household wealth and tight
credit conditions in addition to the increase in the national unemployment rate has resulted in the
FOMC maintaining the overnight lending rate at zero to 0.25% during the third quarter of 2009.
During this quarter, the Federal Reserve Bank has continued to purchase securities to attempt to
keep longer-term interest rates at a tight spread relative to short-term rates.
As a result of these measures, both short- and long-term market interest rates have remained at low
levels during the third quarter of 2009. However, the long-term interest rates have increased from
their prior year-end levels more than the short-term interest rates, causing a more positive slope
to the yield curve. Due to our investment and financing decisions, the more positive the slope of
the yield curve the more favorable the environment is generally for our ability to generate net
interest income. Our interest-bearing liabilities generally reflect movements in short- and
intermediate-term rates, while our interest-earning assets, a majority of which have initial terms
to maturity or repricing greater than one year, generally reflect movements in intermediate- and
long-term interest rates. A positive slope of the yield curve allows us to invest in
interest-earning assets at a wider spread to the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
The impact of interest rate changes on our interest income is generally felt in later periods than
the impact on our interest expense due to differences in the timing of the recognition of items on
our balance sheet. The timing of the recognition of interest-earning assets on our balance sheet
generally lags the current market rates by 60 to 90 days due to the normal time period between
commitment and settlement dates. In contrast, the recognition of interest-bearing liabilities on
our balance sheet generally reflects current market interest rates as we generally fund purchases
at the time of settlement. During a period of decreasing short-term interest rates, this timing
difference has a positive impact on our net interest income as our interest-bearing liabilities
reset to the lower interest rates. If short-term interest rates were to increase, the cost of our
interest-bearing liabilities would also increase and have an adverse impact on our net interest
income.
Also impacting our net interest income and net interest rate spread is the level of prepayment
activity on our interest-sensitive assets. The actual amount of time before mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed securities are repaid can be significantly impacted by changes in market interest
rates and mortgage
Page 47
prepayment rates. Mortgage prepayment rates will vary due to a number of
factors, including the regional economy in the area where the underlying mortgages were originated,
availability of credit, seasonal factors and demographic variables. However, the major factors
affecting prepayment rates are prevailing interest rates, related mortgage refinancing
opportunities and competition. Generally, the level of prepayment activity directly affects the
yield earned on those assets, as the payments received on the interest-earning assets will be
reinvested at the prevailing lower market interest rate. Prepayment rates are generally inversely
related to the prevailing market interest rate, thus, as market interest rates increase, prepayment
rates tend to decrease. Prepayment rates on our mortgage-related assets have increased during the
first nine months of 2009, due to the current low market interest rate environment. We believe the
higher level of prepayment activity may continue as market interest rates are expected to remain at
the current low levels for several quarters.
Calls of investment securities and borrowed funds are also impacted by the level of market interest
rates. The level of calls of investment securities are generally inversely related to the
prevailing market interest rate, meaning as rates decrease the likelihood of a security being
called would increase. The level of call activity generally affects the yield earned on these
assets, as the payment received on the security would be reinvested at the prevailing lower market
interest rate. During the first nine months of 2009 we saw an increase in call activity on our
investment securities as market interest rates remained at these historic lows. We anticipate
continued calls of investment securities due to the anticipated continuation of the low current
market interest rate environment.
Our borrowings have traditionally consisted of structured callable borrowings with ten year final
maturities and initial non-call periods of one to five years. However, during the first nine
months of 2009, deposit growth has funded the growth of our balance sheet. In order to fund future
growth and provide for
our liquidity, we may need to borrow a combination of short-term borrowings with maturities of
three to six months and longer term fixed-maturity borrowings with terms of two to five years.
The likelihood of a borrowing being called is directly related to the current market interest
rates, meaning the higher that interest rates move, the more likely the borrowing would be called.
The level of call activity generally affects the cost of our borrowed funds, as the call of a
borrowing would generally necessitate the re-borrowing of the funds at the higher current market
interest rate. During the first nine months of 2009 we experienced no call activity on our borrowed
funds due to the continued low levels of market interest rates. At September 30, 2009, we had
$22.13 billion of borrowed funds with a weighted-average rate of 4.17% and with call dates within
one year. We anticipate that none of these borrowings will be called assuming current market
interest rates remain stable or increase modestly. We believe, given current market conditions,
that the likelihood that a significant portion of these borrowings would be called will not
increase substantially unless interest rates were to increase by at least 300 basis points.
However, in the event borrowings are called, we anticipate that we will have sufficient resources
to meet this funding commitment by borrowing new funds at the prevailing market interest rate,
using funds generated by deposit growth or by using proceeds from securities sales.
Simulation Model.
Hudson City Bancorp continues to monitor the impact of interest rate
volatility in the same manner as at December 31, 2008, utilizing simulation models as a means of
analyzing the impact of interest rate changes on our net interest income and net present value of
equity. We have not reported the minus 100 or 200 basis point interest rate shock scenarios in
either of our simulation model analyses, as we believe, given the current interest rate environment
and historical interest rate levels, the resulting information would not be meaningful.
Page 48
As a primary means of managing interest rate risk, we monitor the impact of interest rate changes
on our net interest income over the next twelve-month period assuming a simultaneous and parallel
shift in the yield curve. This model does not purport to provide estimates of net interest income
over the next twelve-month period, but attempts to assess the impact of a simultaneous and parallel
interest rate change on our net interest income.
The following table reports the changes to our net interest income over various interest rate
change scenarios.
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Percent Change in
|
Interest Rates
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
|
(Basis points)
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
(3.15
|
)%
|
100
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
50
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
(50)
|
|
|
(5.37
|
)
|
|
The preceding table indicates that at September 30, 2009, in the event of a 200 basis point
increase in interest rates, we would expect to experience a 3.15% decrease in net interest income
as compared to a 2.83% decrease at December 31, 2008. The negative change to net interest income
in the increasing interest rate scenarios was primarily due to the increased expense of our
short-term time deposits. If market rates were to increase 50 basis points per quarter to effect a
200 basis point increase over a 12 month period, rather than an instantaneous 200 basis point increase as reported above, we would
expect to experience a 1.20% decrease in net interest income from the base case (no rate change)
analysis.
The preceding table also indicates that at September 30, 2009, in the event of a 50 basis point
decrease in interest rates, we would expect to experience a 5.37% decrease in net interest income.
This decrease is primarily due to the acceleration of prepayment speeds on our mortgage-related
assets and calls of our investment securities in the lower shocked environment, and the subsequent
replacement of these instruments at the lower prevailing market rate. If market rates were to
decrease incrementally 50 basis points over a twelve month period, rather than an instantaneous 50
basis point decrease as reported in the table above, we would expect to experience a 0.20% decrease
in net interest income from the base case analysis.
We also monitor our interest rate risk by modeling changes in the present value of equity in the
different rate environments. The present value of equity is the difference between the estimated
fair value of interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities. The changes in market value of assets
and liabilities, due to changes in interest rates, reflect the interest sensitivity of those assets
and liabilities as their values are derived from the characteristics of the asset or liability
(i.e., fixed-rate, adjustable-rate, rate caps, rate floors) relative to the current interest rate
environment. For example, in a rising interest rate environment the fair market value of a
fixed-rate asset will decline, whereas the fair market value of an adjustable-rate asset, depending
on its repricing characteristics, may not decline. Increases in the market value of assets will
increase the present value of equity whereas decreases in the market value of assets will decrease
the present value of equity. Conversely, increases in the market value of liabilities will decrease
the present value of equity whereas decreases in the market value of liabilities will increase the
present value of equity.
Page 49
The following table presents the estimated present value of equity over a range of interest rate
change scenarios at September 30, 2009. The present value ratio shown in the table is the present
value of equity as a percent of the present value of total assets in each of the different rate
environments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Value of Equity
|
As Percent of Present
|
Value of Assets
|
Change in
|
|
Present
|
|
Basis Point
|
Interest Rates
|
|
Value Ratio
|
|
Change
|
|
(Basis points)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
100
|
|
|
7.03
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
50
|
|
|
7.39
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
0
|
|
|
7.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50)
|
|
|
6.92
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
In the 200 basis point increase scenario, the present value ratio was 5.30% at September 30, 2009
as compared to 3.84% at December 31, 2008. The change in the present value ratio was negative 206
basis points at September 30, 2009 as compared to positive 8 basis points at December 31, 2008. The
decreases in the present value ratio and the sensitivity measure in the 200 basis point shock
scenario reflect the
pricing related to our borrowed funds and the decrease in the value of our primarily fixed-rate
assets in a higher interest rate environment. The increase in the present value ratio in the base
case and the 200 basis point shock scenario from December 31, 2008 reflects the higher long-term
market interest rates and tighter rate spreads that affect the pricing of our mortgage-related
assets. The increase in the present value ratio is also due to the pricing of our borrowings due to
the current higher long-term market interest rates as compared to the rates at December 31, 2008.
The decrease in the present value ratio in the negative basis point change was primarily due to
higher pricing of our borrowed funds as the structures will increase in duration.
The methods we used in simulation modeling are inherently imprecise. This type of modeling requires
that we make assumptions that may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond
to changes in market interest rates. For example, we assume the composition of the interest
rate-sensitive assets and liabilities will remain constant over the period being measured and that
all interest rate shocks will be uniformly reflected across the yield curve, regardless of the
duration to maturity or repricing. The table assumes that we will take no action in response to the
changes in interest rates. In addition, prepayment estimates and other assumptions within the model
are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties, and, therefore, cannot be determined with
precision. Accordingly, although the previous two tables may provide an estimate of our interest
rate risk at a particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to and do not provide a
precise forecast of the effect of changes in interest rates on our net interest income or present
value of equity.
GAP Analysis.
The following table presents the amounts of our interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities outstanding at September 30, 2009, which we anticipate to reprice or
mature in each of the future time periods shown. Except for prepayment or call activity and
non-maturity deposit decay rates, we determined the amounts of assets and liabilities that reprice
or mature during a particular period in accordance with the earlier of the term to rate reset or
the contractual maturity of the asset or liability. Assumptions used for decay rates are the same
as those used in the preparation of our December 31, 2008 model. Prepayment speeds on our
mortgage-related assets have increased from our December 31, 2008 analysis to reflect actual
prepayment speeds for these items. Callable investment securities and borrowed funds are reported
at the anticipated call date, for those that are callable within one year, or at their
Page 50
contractual
maturity date. Investment securities with step-up features, totaling $3.60 billion, are reported at
the earlier of their next step-up date or anticipated call date. We reported $1.55 billion of
investment securities at their anticipated call date. We have reported no borrowings at their
anticipated call date due to the low interest rate environment. We have excluded non-accrual
mortgage loans of $516.0 million and non-accrual other loans of $1.6 million from the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
two years
|
|
|
three years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
|
|
|
six months
|
|
|
one year to
|
|
|
to three
|
|
|
to five
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or less
|
|
|
to one year
|
|
|
two years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
five years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans
|
|
$
|
2,548,580
|
|
|
$
|
3,074,040
|
|
|
$
|
4,036,735
|
|
|
$
|
3,406,084
|
|
|
$
|
5,171,837
|
|
|
$
|
12,030,030
|
|
|
$
|
30,267,306
|
|
Consumer and other loans
|
|
|
117,555
|
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
|
|
19,825
|
|
|
|
2,896
|
|
|
|
12,024
|
|
|
|
194,718
|
|
|
|
349,931
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
453,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,017
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
2,490,922
|
|
|
|
2,096,592
|
|
|
|
4,479,028
|
|
|
|
4,478,719
|
|
|
|
5,324,347
|
|
|
|
1,433,064
|
|
|
|
20,302,672
|
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
877,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
877,017
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
1,557,175
|
|
|
|
300,105
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
1,198,428
|
|
|
|
5,355,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
8,044,266
|
|
|
|
5,473,650
|
|
|
|
8,535,588
|
|
|
|
9,287,699
|
|
|
|
11,408,208
|
|
|
|
14,856,240
|
|
|
|
57,605,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
57,015
|
|
|
|
57,015
|
|
|
|
76,020
|
|
|
|
76,020
|
|
|
|
190,049
|
|
|
|
304,077
|
|
|
|
760,196
|
|
Interest-bearing demand accounts
|
|
|
181,569
|
|
|
|
181,569
|
|
|
|
269,961
|
|
|
|
269,961
|
|
|
|
465,897
|
|
|
|
494,632
|
|
|
|
1,863,589
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
455,923
|
|
|
|
455,923
|
|
|
|
911,846
|
|
|
|
911,846
|
|
|
|
1,595,731
|
|
|
|
227,962
|
|
|
|
4,559,231
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
9,870,149
|
|
|
|
4,054,976
|
|
|
|
1,231,001
|
|
|
|
112,124
|
|
|
|
72,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,340,721
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
28,675,000
|
|
|
|
30,025,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
10,614,656
|
|
|
|
4,899,483
|
|
|
|
3,088,828
|
|
|
|
1,519,951
|
|
|
|
2,724,148
|
|
|
|
29,701,671
|
|
|
|
52,548,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate sensitivity gap
|
|
$
|
(2,570,390
|
)
|
|
$
|
574,167
|
|
|
$
|
5,446,760
|
|
|
$
|
7,767,748
|
|
|
$
|
8,684,060
|
|
|
$
|
(14,845,431
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,056,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap
|
|
$
|
(2,570,390
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,996,223
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,450,537
|
|
|
$
|
11,218,285
|
|
|
$
|
19,902,345
|
|
|
$
|
5,056,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap
as a percent of total assets
|
|
|
(4.37
|
)
%
|
|
|
(3.39
|
)
%
|
|
|
5.86
|
%
|
|
|
19.05
|
%
|
|
|
33.80
|
%
|
|
|
8.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative interest-earning assets
as a percent of interest-bearing
liabilities
|
|
|
75.78
|
%
|
|
|
87.13
|
%
|
|
|
118.55
|
%
|
|
|
155.75
|
%
|
|
|
187.11
|
%
|
|
|
109.62
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
The cumulative one-year gap as a percent of total assets was negative 3.39% at September 30, 2009
compared with negative 7.09% at December 31, 2008. The decline in the negative cumulative one-year
gap primarily reflects the increase in anticipated prepayment activity on our mortgage-related
assets and the growth during 2009 in our money market deposit accounts which have a longer decay
period than our traditional deposit funding source of short-term time deposits.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Ronald E. Hermance, Jr., our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and James C. Kranz,
our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our
Page 51
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of September 30, 2009. Based upon their
evaluation, they each found that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file and submit under the Exchange
Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required and that such information
was accumulated and communicated to our management as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosures.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring
in the ordinary course of business. We believe that these routine legal proceedings, in the
aggregate, are immaterial to our financial condition and results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
For a summary of risk factors relevant to our operations, please see Part I, Item 1A in our 2008
Annual Report on Form 10-K and our June 30, 2009 Form 10-Q. There has been no material change in
risk factors since June 30, 2009, except as described below.
Higher FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments could adversely affect our financial
condition.
FDIC insurance premiums have increased substantially in 2009 and we may have to pay significantly
higher FDIC premiums in the future and prepay insurance premiums. Market developments have
significantly depleted the insurance fund of the FDIC and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured
deposits. The FDIC adopted a revised risk-based deposit insurance assessment schedule on February
27, 2009, which raised regular deposit insurance premiums. On May 22, 2009, the FDIC also
implemented a five basis point special assessment of each insured depository institutions total
assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, but no more than 10 basis points times the
institutions assessment base for the second quarter of 2009, collected by the FDIC on September
30, 2009. The amount of this special assessment was $21.1 million. Additional special assessments
may be imposed by the FDIC for future quarters at the same or higher levels.
In addition, the FDIC recently announced a proposed rule that would require insured depository
institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of
2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. If the proposed rule is adopted, the prepaid assessments
would be collected on December 30, 2009. We have estimated that the total prepaid assessments would
be approximately $150.5 million, which would be recorded as a prepaid expense (an asset) as of
December 30, 2009. As of December 31, 2009 and each quarter thereafter, we would record an expense
for its regular quarterly assessment for the quarter and an offsetting credit to the prepaid
assessment until the asset is exhausted.
Page 52
These changes may cause the premiums charged by the FDIC to increase and could significantly
increase our noninterest expense in 2009 and in future periods. The prepayment of our FDIC
assessments also may temporarily reduce our liquidity.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table reports information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the third
quarter of 2009 and the stock repurchase plans approved by our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
that May Yet Be
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Average
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
the Plans or
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
per Share
|
|
or Programs
|
|
Programs (1)
|
|
July 1-July 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,123,550
|
|
August 1-August 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,123,550
|
|
September 1-September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,123,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
On July 25, 2007, Hudson City Bancorp announced the adoption of its eighth Stock Repurchase
Program, which authorized the repurchase of up to 51,400,000 shares of common stock. This program has no expiration date.
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matter was submitted during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 to a vote of security holders
of Hudson City Bancorp through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. *
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
The following information from the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009, filed
|
Page 53
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
with the SEC on November 6, 2009, has been
formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language: (i)
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, (ii)
Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, (iii)
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders
Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 , (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and (v)
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(tagged as blocks of text). *
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Pursuant to SEC rules, this exhibit will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
|
Page 54
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
Date: November 6, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Ronald E. Hermance, Jr.
|
|
|
|
Ronald E. Hermance, Jr.
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 6, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ James C. Kranz
|
|
|
|
James C. Kranz
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
Page 55
Hudson City Bancorp (NASDAQ:HCBK)
Historical Stock Chart
From Aug 2024 to Sep 2024
Hudson City Bancorp (NASDAQ:HCBK)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2023 to Sep 2024