UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number 000-51623
Cynosure, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
04-3125110
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
5 Carlisle Road
Westford, MA
|
|
01886
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code
(978) 256-4200
Securities registered
pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if
disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
x
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
¨
|
|
Accelerated filer
x
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
¨
|
|
Smaller reporting company
¨
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
x
Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the last sale price for such stock on June 30, 2008: $190,814,890.
The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of March 9, 2009:
|
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Number of Shares
|
Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
9,760,831
|
Class B Common Stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
2,939,161
|
|
|
Portions of the
registrants definitive Proxy Statement for its 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than
statements of historical facts, included in this Annual Report regarding our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenues, projected costs, prospects, plans, objectives of management and expected market growth are
forward-looking statements. The words anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, may, plan, predict, project, will,
would and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements
about:
|
|
|
our ability to identify and penetrate new markets for our products and technology;
|
|
|
|
our ability to innovate, develop and commercialize new products;
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory clearances;
|
|
|
|
our sales and marketing capabilities and strategy in the United States and internationally;
|
|
|
|
our intellectual property portfolio; and
|
|
|
|
our estimates regarding expenses, future revenues, capital requirements and needs for additional financing.
|
We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on
our forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. We have included important factors in the cautionary statements
included in this Annual Report, particularly in Item 1A of this Annual Report, and in our other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from the forward-looking
statements that we make.
You should read this Annual Report and the documents that we have filed as exhibits to the Annual Report
completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. It is routine for internal projections and expectations to change as the year or each quarter in the year progresses, and therefore
it should be clearly understood that the internal projections and beliefs upon which we base our expectations are made as of the date of this Annual Report and may change prior to the end of each quarter or the year. While we may elect to update
forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
3
PART I
Overview
We develop and market aesthetic treatment systems that are used by physicians and other practitioners to perform non-invasive procedures to remove hair,
treat vascular lesions, rejuvenate skin through the treatment of shallow vascular lesions and pigmented lesions, as well as multi-colored tattoos, temporarily reduce the appearance of cellulite, treat wrinkles, skin texture, skin discoloration and
skin tightening, and to perform minimally invasive procedures for LaserBodySculpting for the removal of unwanted fat. Our systems incorporate a broad range of laser and other light-based energy sources, including Alexandrite, pulse dye, Nd:Yag and
diode lasers, as well as intense pulsed light. We believe that we are one of only a few companies that currently offer aesthetic treatment systems utilizing Alexandrite and pulse dye lasers, which are particularly well suited for some applications
and skin types. We offer single energy source systems as well as workstations that incorporate two or more different types of lasers or pulsed light technologies. We offer multiple technologies and system alternatives at a variety of price points
depending primarily on the number and type of energy sources included in the system. Our newer products are designed to be easily upgradeable to add additional energy sources and handpieces, which provides our customers with technological
flexibility as they expand their practices. As the aesthetic treatment market evolves to include new customers, such as aesthetic spas and additional physician specialties, we believe that our broad technology base and tailored solutions will
provide us with a competitive advantage.
We sell 18 different aesthetic treatment systems and have focused our development and marketing
efforts on offering leading, or flagship, products for each of the major aesthetic procedure categories that we address. Our flagship products are:
|
|
|
the
Apogee Elite
system for hair removal;
|
|
|
|
the
Cynergy
system for the treatment of vascular lesions;
|
|
|
|
the
TriActive LaserDermology
system for the temporary reduction of the appearance of cellulite;
|
|
|
|
the
Affirm
and
Affirm CO2
systems for anti-aging, including treatments for wrinkles, skin texture, skin discoloration and skin tightening
|
|
|
|
the
Smartlipo
and
Smartlipo MPX
systems for LaserBodySculpting
SM
for the removal of unwanted fat; and
|
|
|
|
the
Accolade
system for the removal of benign pigmented lesions, including pigmented lesions known as Nevus of Ota and Nevus of Ito, as well as multi-colored
tattoos.
|
In addition to their primary applications, the
Apogee Elite
and
Cynergy
systems can each be used by practitioners
for a variety of other applications.
In January 2008, we introduced the
Accolade
, our sixth flagship product, which is a high
powered 755nm, Q-switched Alexandrite laser for the removal of benign pigmented lesions, including pigmented lesions known as Nevus of Ota and Nevus of Ito, as well as multi-colored tattoos.
In April 2008, we introduced the
Smartlipo MPX
workstation, the next generation of our workstations for laser lipolysis.
Smartlipo MPX
is
the only FDA-cleared, dual-wavelength laser system designed to efficiently liquefy fat and tighten skin through tissue coagulation.
In
July 2008, we introduced the
Affirm CO2
workstation, which, in contrast to the original
Affirm
workstation, uses an ablative approach, which involves the removal of upper layers of skin, to target the epidermal and dermal layer with
the objective of treating deep wrinkles and significant photoaging.
4
We sell our products through a direct sales force in North America, four European countries, Japan and
China and through international distributors in 55 other countries. As of December 31, 2008, we had sold more than 8,900 aesthetic treatment systems worldwide. See Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for revenue, net asset and
long-lived asset information by geographic region.
Corporate Information
We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in July 1991. Our principal executive offices are located at 5 Carlisle Road, Westford,
Massachusetts 01886, and our telephone number is (978) 256-4200.
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and, accordingly, file reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such reports, proxy statements and other information can be read and copied at the public reference
facilities maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission at the Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the
Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains material regarding issuers that file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Our website address is www.cynosure.com. The information on our website is not a part of this Annual Report. We make available free of
charge on our website our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Industry
Aesthetic Market Opportunity
InMedica, a division of IMS Research, an independent aesthetic treatment market research firm, estimates in the World Market for Aesthetic
Devices2008 Edition that the world market for professional aesthetic devices was estimated at $1.2 billion in 2007 and is forecast to grow to $1.9 billion in 2012, representing a compounded average annual growth rate of 9.5%.
Key factors contributing to growth in the markets for aesthetic treatment procedures and aesthetic laser equipment include:
|
|
|
the aging population of industrialized countries and the rising discretionary income of the baby boomer demographic segment;
|
|
|
|
the desire of many individuals to improve their appearance;
|
|
|
|
the development of technology that allows for safe and effective aesthetic treatment procedures;
|
|
|
|
the impact of managed care and reimbursement on physician economics, which has motivated physicians to establish or expand their elective aesthetic practices with
procedures that are paid for directly by patients; and
|
|
|
|
reductions in cost per procedure, which has attracted a broader base of clients and patients for aesthetic treatment procedures.
|
Expansion Into Non-Traditional Physician Customer and Medi-Spa Markets
Aesthetic treatment procedures that use lasers and other light-based equipment have traditionally been performed by dermatologists and plastic surgeons.
Based on published membership information from professional medical organizations, there are approximately 18,000 dermatologists and plastic surgeons in the
5
United States. A broader group of physicians in the United States, including primary care physicians, obstetricians and gynecologists, have incorporated
aesthetic treatment procedures into their practices. These non-traditional physician customers are largely motivated to offer aesthetic procedures by the potential for a reliable revenue stream that is unaffected by managed care and government payor
reimbursement economics. We believe that there are approximately 200,000 of these potential non-traditional physician customers in the United States and Canada, representing a significant market opportunity that is only beginning to be addressed by
suppliers of lasers and other light-based aesthetic equipment. Some physicians are electing to open medical spas, often adjacent to their conventional office space, where they perform aesthetic procedures in an environment designed to feel less like
a health care facility.
The Structure of Skin and Conditions that Affect Appearance
The human skin consists of several layers. The epidermis is the outer layer and contains the cells that determine pigmentation, or skin color. The dermis
is a thicker inner layer that contains hair follicles and large and small blood vessels. Beneath the dermis is a layer that contains subdermal fat. The dermis is composed of mostly collagen, which provides strength and flexibility to the skin.
The appearance of the skin may change over time due to a variety of factors, including age, sun damage, circulatory changes, deterioration
of collagen and the human bodys diminished ability to repair and renew itself. These changes include:
|
|
|
blood vessels and veins that are visible at the skins surface; and
|
|
|
|
the appearance of cellulite.
|
Changes to the skin caused by pigmentation are called pigmented lesions and are the result of the accumulation of excess melanin, the substance that gives skin its color. Pigmented lesions are characterized by the brown color of melanin and
include freckles, solar lentigines, also known as sun spots or age spots, and café au lait birthmarks. Changes to the skin caused by abnormally large or numerous blood vessels located under the surface of the skin are called vascular lesions.
Vascular lesions are characterized by blood vessels that are visible through the skin or that result in a red appearance of the skin. Vascular lesions may be superficial and shallow in the skin or deep in the skin. Shallow vascular lesions include
small spider veins, port wine birthmarks, facial veins and rosacea, a chronic skin condition that causes rosy coloration and acne-like pimples on the face. Deep vascular lesions include large spider veins and leg veins.
People with undesirable skin conditions or unwanted hair growth often seek aesthetic treatments, including treatments using non-invasive laser and
light-based technologies.
Non-Invasive Laser and Light-Based Aesthetic Treatments
A laser is a device that creates and amplifies a narrow, intense beam of light. Lasers have been used for medical and aesthetic applications since the
1960s. Intense pulsed light technology was introduced in the 1990s and uses flashlamps, rather than lasers, to generate multiple wavelengths of light with varying pulse durations, or time intervals, over which the energy is delivered.
By producing intense bursts of highly focused light, lasers and other light-based technologies selectively target hair follicles, veins or collagen in or
below the dermis, as well as cells responsible for pigmentation in the epidermis. When the target absorbs sufficient energy, it is destroyed. The degree to which energy is absorbed in
6
the skin depends upon the skin structure targetede.g., hair follicle or blood vesseland the skin typee.g., light or dark. Different types
of lasers and other light-based technologies are needed to effectively treat the spectrum of skin types and conditions. As a result, an active aesthetic practice may require multiple laser or other light-based systems in order to offer treatments to
its entire client base.
Different types of lasers are currently used for a wide range of aesthetic treatments. Each type of laser operates
at its own wavelength, measured in nanometers, which corresponds to a particular emission and color in the light spectrum. The most common lasers used for non-invasive aesthetic treatments are:
|
|
|
Pulse dye lasers
produce a yellow light that functions at a shallow penetration depth.
|
|
|
|
Alexandrite lasers
produce a near infrared invisible light that functions with high power at a deep penetration depth.
|
|
|
|
Diode lasers
produce a near infrared invisible light that functions at a deep penetration depth.
|
|
|
|
Nd:Yag lasers
produce a near infrared invisible light that functions over a wide range of penetration depths.
|
In addition to selecting the appropriate wavelength for a particular application, laser and other light-based treatments require an appropriate balance
among three other parameters to optimize safety and effectiveness for aesthetic treatments:
|
|
|
energy levelthe amount of light emitted to heat the target;
|
|
|
|
pulse durationthe time interval over which the energy is delivered; and
|
|
|
|
spot sizethe diameter of the energy beam.
|
As a result of the wide spectrum of aesthetic applications, patient skin types and users of technology, customer purchasing objectives for aesthetic treatment systems are diverse. We believe that as aesthetic spas and
non-traditional physician customers play increasingly important roles as purchasers of aesthetic treatment systems, the market for these products will become even more diverse. Specifically, we expect that owners of different types of aesthetic
treatment practices will place different emphases on various system attributes, such as breadth of treatment applications, return on investment, upgradeability and price. Accordingly, we believe that there is significant market opportunity for a
company that tailors its product offerings to meet the needs of a wide range of market segments.
Minimally Invasive Laser Treatments
Laser lipolysis is a minimally invasive procedure that not only complements but augments traditional liposuction. As the most
popular cosmetic surgical procedure in 2007, liposuction was performed approximately 500,000 times in the United States.
Our Solution
We offer tailored customer solutions to address the market for non-invasive light-based aesthetic treatment applications, including hair removal,
treatment of vascular lesions, skin rejuvenation through the treatment of shallow vascular lesions and pigmented lesions, as well as multi-colored tattoos, temporary reduction of the appearance of cellulite, treatment of wrinkles, skin texture, skin
discoloration and skin tightening through tissue coagulation, and for minimally invasive procedures for LaserBodySculpting for the removal of unwanted fat. We believe our laser and other light-based systems are reliable, user friendly and easily
incorporated into both physician practices and spas. We complement our product offerings with comprehensive and responsive service offerings, including assistance with training, aesthetic practice development consultation and product maintenance. As
of December 31, 2008, we had sold more than 8,900 aesthetic treatment systems.
7
We believe that the following factors enhance our market position:
|
|
|
Broad Technology Base.
Our products are based on a broad range of technologies and incorporate different types of lasers, such as Alexandrite, pulse dye,
Nd:Yag and diode, as well as intense pulsed light devices. We believe we are one of a few companies that currently offer aesthetic treatment systems using Alexandrite and pulse dye lasers, which are particularly well suited for some applications and
skin types. The following table provides information regarding the principal energy sources used in laser and other light-based aesthetic treatments that we offer and the primary application of each of these energy sources. The table also indicates
how many of the six largest competitors in our industry we believe also offer products using this energy source. See Competition below. We base our belief as to the six largest competitors in our industry and their product
offerings on public company filings and information available on company websites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competitive Offerings
|
Energy Source
|
|
Type of Light/Wavelength
|
|
Principal Applications
|
|
Cynosure
|
|
Six Largest
Competitors
|
Pulse Dye Laser
|
|
Visible light
(Yellow)(585/595 nm)
|
|
Vascular lesions, including
shallow and deep lesions
|
|
X
|
|
1 of 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alexandrite Laser
|
|
Near infrared invisible
light (755 nm)
|
|
Hair removal, particularly
for light skin
types
|
|
X
|
|
1 of 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diode Laser
|
|
Near infrared invisible
light (805/940/980
nm)
|
|
Hair removal, particularly for light skin types
Vascular
lesions, particularly shallow lesions Temporary reduction in the appearance of cellulite
|
|
X
|
|
4 of 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nd:Yag Laser
|
|
Near infrared invisible
light (1064 nm)
|
|
Hair removal, particularly for medium and dark skin types Vascular lesions, particularly deep lesions
|
|
X
|
|
5 of 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intense Pulsed Light
|
|
Visible/Near infrared
invisible light (400-950
nm)
|
|
Hair removal, all skin types Vascular lesions, particularly shallow lesions and pigmented lesions Temporary reduction in the appearance of cellulite
|
|
X
|
|
5 of 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Energy Source Workstations
(incorporating two or more energy sources)
|
|
Multiple
|
|
Multiple
|
|
X
|
|
3 of 6
|
|
|
|
Expansive Portfolio of Aesthetic Treatment Systems.
We sell 18 different aesthetic treatment systems so that customers can select the product best suited to
their practice or business. Our product portfolio includes single energy source systems as well as workstations that incorporate two or more different types of lasers or light-based technologies. By offering multiple technologies and system
alternatives at a variety of price points, we seek to provide customers with tailored solutions that meet the specific needs of their practices while providing significant flexibility in their level of investment.
|
8
|
|
|
Upgrade Paths Within Product Families.
We design our products to facilitate upgrading within product families. These upgrade paths provide our customers with
the opportunity to add additional energy sources and handpieces, which provides our customers with technological flexibility as they expand their practices.
|
|
|
|
Global Presence.
We have offered our products in international markets for over 17 years, with approximately 34% of our revenue generated from product sales
outside of North America in 2008. We target international markets through a direct sales force in four European countries, Japan and China and through international distributors in 55 other countries.
|
|
|
|
Strong Reputation Established Over 17-Year History.
We have been in the business of developing and marketing aesthetic treatment systems for over 17 years.
As a result of this history, we believe the Cynosure brand name is associated with a tradition of technological leadership.
|
Our
Business Strategy
Our goal is to become the worldwide leader in providing non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic treatment
systems. The key elements of our business strategy to achieve this goal are to:
|
|
|
Offer a Full Range of Tailored Aesthetic Solutions.
We believe that we have one of the broadest product portfolios in the industry, with multiple product
offerings incorporating a range of laser and light sources at various price points across many aesthetic applications. Our approach is designed to allow our customers to select products that best suit their client base, practice size and the types
of treatments that they wish to offer. This allows us to address the needs of the traditional physician customer market as well as the growing non-traditional physician customer market. Many of our newer products can be upgraded to systems with
greater functionality as our customers practices expand.
|
|
|
|
Launch Innovative New Products and Technologies for Emerging Aesthetic Applications.
Our research and development team builds on our broad range of laser and
light-based technologies to target unmet needs in significant aesthetic treatment markets. Since 2002, we have introduced 16 new products. We launched the
Apogee Elite
system, our flagship product for hair removal, in March 2004; the
Cynergy
system, our flagship product for the treatment of vascular lesions, in February 2005, and the
Affirm
system, our flagship product for anti-aging, in April 2006. In addition, we began to distribute the
TriActive
LaserDermology
system, our flagship product for the temporary reduction of the appearance of cellulite, in North America in February 2004. In November 2006, we began to distribute the
Smartlipo
system, which provides a minimally invasive
procedure for LaserBodySculpting for the removal of unwanted fat. During the second quarter of 2008 we presented the next generation of laser lipolysis to
Smartlipo
by introducing the MPX workstation.
Smartlipo MPX
is the only
FDA-approved, dual-wavelength laser system designed to efficiently liquefy fat and tighten skin through collagen remodeling. In the third quarter of 2008 we introduced the
Affirm CO2
workstation, which, in contrast to the original
Affirm
workstation, uses an ablative approach, which involves the removal of upper layers of skin, to target the epidermal and dermal layer with the objective of treating dyschromia, deep wrinkles and significant photoaging. We are also
working on new technologies for other emerging aesthetic applications.
|
|
|
|
Provide Comprehensive, Ongoing Customer Service.
We support our customers with a worldwide service organization that includes 23 field service engineers in
North America and 30 international field service engineers working directly for us or our international distributors. The field service engineers install our products and respond rapidly to service calls to minimize disruption to our customers
businesses. Most of our new products are modular in design to enable quick and efficient service and support. We maintain our service infrastructure with training and inventory hubs in Europe and the Asia/Pacific region.
|
|
|
|
Generate Additional Revenue from Existing Customer Base.
We believe that there are opportunities for us to generate additional revenue from existing
customers who are already familiar with our products.
|
9
Many of our existing traditional and non-traditional customers may be purchasers of additional aesthetic
treatment systems to address increasing treatment volumes or new treatment applications. We also expect that customers purchasing our new modular products will be candidates for technology upgrades to enhance the capabilities of their systems. In
addition, two of our six flagship products, our
Affirm
and
Smartlipo
systems, contain consumable parts and we generate additional revenue on sales of these consumable parts to our existing customers. As we continue to grow our service
organization, we are seeking to increase the percentage of our customers that enters into service contracts, which would provide additional recurring customer revenue.
Products
We offer a broad portfolio of aesthetic treatment systems that address a wide variety of
applications.
The following table provides information concerning our flagship products and their applications. We use the flagship
designation for our products that are our leading products for a particular application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
|
|
|
Laser/
Light
Source
|
|
Year
Introduced
|
|
Hair
Removal
|
|
Vascular
Lesions
|
|
Skin
Rejuve-
nation(1)
|
|
Pigmented
Lesions
|
|
Temporary
Reduction
of
Appearance
of
Cellulite
|
|
Acne
|
|
Tattoo
Removal
|
|
Anti-
Aging
|
|
LaserBody
Sculpting
and
Removal
of
Unwanted
Fat
|
Flagship Products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apogee Elite
|
|
Alexandrite
|
|
2004
|
|
Flagship
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nd:Yag
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apogee 5500
|
|
Alexandrite
|
|
2004
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acclaim 7000
|
|
Nd:Yag
|
|
2004
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cynergy
|
|
Pulse Dye
Nd:Yag
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Flagship
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vstar
|
|
Pulse Dye
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acclaim 7000
|
|
Nd:Yag
|
|
2004
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TriActive
LaserDermology(2)
|
|
Diode
Laser
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flagship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affirm / Affirm CO2
|
|
Nd:Yag
Pulsed
Light /
CO2
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flagship
|
|
|
Smartlipo(2)/ Smartlipo MPX
|
|
Nd:Yag
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flagship
|
Accolade
|
|
Alexandrite
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flagship
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
We consider skin rejuvenation to be the treatment of shallow vascular lesions and pigmented lesions to rejuvenate the skins appearance.
|
(2)
|
We distribute the
TriActive LaserDermology
and
Smartlipo
systems in North America pursuant to a distribution agreement with El.En S.p.A, which we refer to as El.En. We
distribute the
Smartlipo MPX
systems internationally pursuant to a distribution agreement with El.En.
|
System
Components
Each of our systems consists of a control console and one or more handpieces. Our control consoles are each comprised of
a graphical user interface, a laser or other light source, control system software and high voltage electronics. The graphical user interface allows the practitioner to set the appropriate laser or flashlamp parameters to meet the requirements of a
particular application and patient. The laser or other light source consists of electronics, a visible aiming beam, a focusing lens and a laser or flashlamp. Using the graphical user interface, the practitioner can independently adjust the
systems power level and pulse duration to optimize the desired treatments safety and effectiveness. The graphical user interface on our multiple energy workstations also allows the practitioner to change energy sources with the press of
a button. The graphical user interfaces on our intense pulsed light systems offer practitioners a choice between using programmed preset treatment settings that address a variety of skin types and treatment options or manually adjusting the energy
level and pulse duration settings. The control system software communicates the operators instructions from the graphical user interface to the systems components and manages system performance and calibration.
10
The handpieces on our laser systems deliver the laser energy through a maneuverable optical fiber to the
treatment area. These handpieces weigh approximately eight ounces and are ergonomically designed to allow the practitioner to use the system with one hand and without becoming fatigued. Other features of our laser system handpieces include:
|
|
|
interchangeable components that permit the practitioner to easily adjust the spot size; and
|
|
|
|
an integrated aiming beam of harmless visible light that allows the practitioner to verify the treatment area, thereby reducing the risk of unintended skin damage
and potentially reducing treatment time.
|
The handpieces for our intense pulsed light systems consist of the flashlamp, a
wavelength filter and, on some models, an integrated flashlamp cooling system. These handpieces weigh approximately two pounds and also are ergonomically designed to be operated with one hand.
Two of our eight flagship products, our
Affirm
and
Smartlipo
systems, contain consumable parts. The
Affirm
system contains a highly
durable micro lens array tip, which delivers the laser energy employed that can treat an average of ten treatment areas. We currently offer three different micro lens array tips, which cover a variety of treatment areas. The
Smartlipo
systems
contain a consumable laser fiber that delivers the laser energy directly to subcutaneous fat cells-causing them to rupture.
Practitioners
generally use our laser systems in combination with a cooling system. We offer our customers our
SmartCool
treatment cooling system, which we purchase from a third party supplier and sell as a private label product under the Cynosure
SmartCool
brand. Our
SmartCool
product has nine variable settings and allows the practitioner to provide a continuous flow of chilled air before, during and after treatment to cool and comfort the patients skin. The
SmartCool
handpiece, which is specially designed for use with our laser systems, interlocks with the laser handpiece. In contrast to some competitive cooling systems, there are no disposable supplies required to use our
SmartCool
system. In North
America, our
SmartCool
system is generally packaged and sold with our laser aesthetic treatment systems, and nearly all of our North American customers purchase a
SmartCool
system when they purchase one of our laser aesthetic treatment
systems. Outside of North America, our customers either purchase our
SmartCool
system when they purchase one of our aesthetic treatment systems or they purchase another cooling system from a third party supplier.
Applications
Practitioners
use our products to perform a variety of non-invasive procedures to remove hair, treat vascular and pigmented lesions, rejuvenate skin through the treatment of shallow vascular lesions and pigmented lesions, temporarily reduce the appearance of
cellulite, treat wrinkles, skin texture, skin discoloration and skin tightening through tissue coagulation, and to perform minimally invasive procedures for LaserBodySculpting for the removal of unwanted fat. These applications of our products are
described below.
Hair Removal.
In a typical laser or pulsed light hair removal treatment, the target area is first cleaned and
shaved. The practitioner then selects appropriate laser or pulsed light parameters based on the patients skin and hair types and pre-cools the treatment area. The practitioner next applies the handpiece to the target area and delivers laser or
pulsed light energy to the selected area. The laser or pulsed light removes hair by directing energy to the target melanin pigment of the hair follicle, destroying the hair follicle without harming the surrounding skin. This procedure can last from
a few minutes to one hour depending on the size of the treatment area and laser or pulsed light spot size. Chilled air is applied to the treatment area on a continuous basis to cool and comfort the patients skin. Generally, for permanent
reduction, hair removal requires three to six treatments spaced four to six weeks apart.
11
Our
Apogee Elite
workstation is our flagship product for hair removal. It is a two-in-one laser
system that contains both an Alexandrite laser, which is best suited for hair removal for patients with light skin types, and an Nd:Yag laser, which is best suited for hair removal for patients with medium and dark skin types or tanned skin. The
practitioner can switch between these two energy sources simply by pressing a button on the system console. Features of the
Apogee Elite
system include:
|
|
|
A wide range of separately adjustable power and pulse duration settings. This allows the practitioner to select the best settings for safe and efficient hair
removal depending on the patients skin and hair type. Some competitive systems do not permit pulse duration adjustment, which we believe may reduce the effectiveness of the treatment, particularly for thicker hair.
|
|
|
|
A large, 15 millimeter spot size and a laser beam that distributes energy evenly over the entire treatment area. This allows the practitioner to treat a targeted
area in an efficient manner. Some competitive systems have smaller spot sizes or beams that concentrate the energy in the middle of the treatment area of each pulse of light, which requires more overlap of the treatment areas of the individual
pulses of light to achieve an effective result.
|
|
|
|
A rapid pulse rate. This permits the practitioner to cover the treatment area quickly, which is particularly important when removing hair from large areas, such as
backs and legs.
|
In addition to the
Apogee Elite
system, each of our
Apogee 5500,
and
Acclaim 7000
systems can be used for hair removal.
Treatment of Vascular Lesions.
To treat vascular lesions the practitioner generally first
pre-cools the target area and then applies the system handpiece to deliver laser energy to the treatment area. Depending on the size of the treatment area, procedures last between 20 and 30 minutes. In some cases, a topical anesthetic is applied to
the treatment area to minimize pain. For spider veins, redness and rosacea, patients generally receive between two and four treatments spaced over two to three weeks. For port wine birthmarks, patients may receive ten or more treatments.
Our
Cynergy
workstation is our flagship product for the treatment of vascular lesions. The
Cynergy
system combines a pulse dye laser,
which is best suited for treating shallow vascular lesions, such as port wine birthmarks, facial veins and rosacea, and an Nd:Yag laser, which is best suited for treating large or deep veins, such as leg veins. The practitioner can switch between
these two energy sources simply by pressing a button on the system console. Other features of the
Cynergy
system include:
|
|
|
A wide range of separately adjustable power and pulse duration settings. This allows the practitioner to select the best settings for safe and efficient treatment
depending on the particular type and depth of the vascular lesion to be treated.
|
|
|
|
One of the most powerful pulse dye lasers currently available in the aesthetic treatment system market. The power of this laser allows a practitioner to provide
treatment with a spot size that is larger than would be effective with a less powerful laser, thereby enhancing treatment efficiency.
|
|
|
|
SixPulse
(TM) technology in the pulse dye laser, which distributes the power of one long pulse of energy into six micro pulses. This allows the practitioner
to deliver more energy with less patient discomfort.
|
|
|
|
A choice of five different spot sizes that are easily selected through the use of interchangeable headpiece components. This allows the practitioner to select the
appropriate spot size for the particular vascular lesion to be treated. For example, a large spot size is generally used for a large leg vein, while a small spot size is normally used for facial veins.
|
In March 2006, we obtained FDA clearance for our innovative
Multiplex
(TM) energy delivery system that is now available on the
Cynergy
system. Our
Multiplex
system mixes the energy from the two lasers included in
Cynergy
system by quickly following a pulse of energy from the pulse dye laser with a pulse of energy from the
12
Nd:Yag laser. Clinical studies that we conducted have shown that
Multiplex
delivery allows for more efficient treatment of vascular lesions by
reducing the amount of laser power required and allowing the laser energy to penetrate deeper into the target.
In addition to the
Cynergy
system, each of our
Apogee Elite, Acclaim 7000,
and
VStar
systems can be used for the treatment of vascular lesions.
Anti-Aging.
We believe the marketplace is moving towards a more non-invasive system with anti-aging procedures, including wrinkle reduction, pigmentation, redness and overall skin rejuvenation. Our
Affirm
and
Affirm
CO2
was created to address the needs of the anti-aging demand. Anti-aging treatments were historically performed by physicians who could only target one condition and one skin layer during each treatment. Previously, patients often faced longer,
more painful procedures that penetrated into the dermal layers and could potentially damage healthy skin.
Our
Affirm
system is our
flagship product for anti-aging, including treatments for wrinkles, skin texture, skin discoloration and skin tightening through tissue coagulation. The
Affirm
system is the first micro-rejuvenation system, which includes our patent pending
mid-infrared Combined Apex Pulse(TM), or CAP, delivery system and Xenon Pulsed Light, or XPL, technology in one system. Our proprietary CAP technology stimulates collagen production throughout the entire treatment area. Through precise thermal
manipulation of the epidermal and dermal tissue, it remodels collagen through the papillary dermis to promote collagen production and skin tightening. The laser energy is delivered through a durable and disposable tip that can treat an average of
ten treatment areas. The XPL portion of the system effectively eradicates dyschromia, a common condition associated with aging skin. The XPL provides enhanced outcomes by targeting superficial pigments, veins and the blush of rosacea associated with
sun damaged skin.
In 2007, we expanded our anti-aging aesthetic solution to include a new 1320 nm wavelength Nd:Yag laser. The
Affirm
product family now incorporates three energy sources and the new deep-heating component provided by the new 1320 nm wavelength Nd:Yag laser allows for tissue tightening, as a result of tissue coagulation, which complements the current 1440 nm
Nd:Yag laser for fractional micro-rejuvenation and the Xenon Pulsed Light system for discoloration. We began shipping these new upgradeable systems in mid-2007. Customers can also purchase the multi-energy
Affirm
workstations with three
separate energy sources as well as three different lens arrays that encompass the full range of anti-aging applications in a single platform.
In 2008, we introduced the
Affirm CO2
system, an ablative workstation with a proprietary scanning delivery system that combines ablative CO2 resurfacing and rejuvenation in a single laser system. The
Affirm CO2
system offers a
range of settings that enable physicians to customize the treatment based on the aesthetic goals and downtime expectations of individual patients. The
Affirm CO2
system is the newest flagship addition to the
Affirm
family of products
for anti-aging.
Skin Rejuvenation.
Skin rejuvenation involves the treatment of shallow vascular lesions and pigmented lesions to
rejuvenate the skins appearance. In a skin rejuvenation procedure, the practitioner applies the system handpiece to the target area and delivers laser or pulsed light energy. The energy destroys the shallow vascular lesions and pigmented
lesions and rejuvenates the skins appearance without damage to the treated or surrounding area through the improvement in skin texture and reduction or elimination of skin irregularities. Cooling is generally not required. Patients typically
receive between four to six treatments of approximately 30 minutes each. Treatments are spaced two to four weeks apart.
Each of our
Apogee Elite
,
Acclaim 7000
and
Cynergy
systems can be used for skin rejuvenation through the treatment of shallow vascular lesions and pigmented lesions.
Temporary Reduction of Appearance of Cellulite.
Cellulite is a deposit of fat that causes a dimple or other uneven appearance of the skin on
women, typically around the thighs, hips and buttocks. According to published reports, an estimated 80% of women have some degree of cellulite. In a treatment for the temporary reduction of
13
the appearance of cellulite, the practitioner applies the multifunction handpiece to deliver diode laser energy, as well as suction and manipulation therapy,
to the treatment area. The laser energy and suction and manipulation therapy enhance micro-circulation in the area of the cellulite. Treatment for the temporary reduction in the appearance of cellulite requires a series of treatments of
approximately 30 to 45 minutes each, depending on the treatment area and patient response.
Our
TriActive LaserDermology
system is
our flagship product for temporarily reducing the appearance of cellulite. The
TriActive
system contains six low-energy diode lasers, mechanical massage and suction features and localized cooling. The
TriActive
system is one of only
two light-based systems, and the only laser-based system, cleared by the FDA for use for the temporary reduction in the appearance of cellulite. In addition, the FDA has cleared
TriActive
system as an over-the-counter device, for sale and use
without physician supervision, because its diode lasers are sealed and do not pose a risk of exposure to operators eyes. We believe that
TriActive
system is the only light-based system for this application that has been so cleared by
the FDA, which significantly facilitates our marketing of
TriActive
system to the growing aesthetic spa market.
LaserBodySculpting for the Removal of Unwanted Fat.
Liposuction for body sculpting is the leading procedure to remove or reduce fat cells.
Our
Smartlipo
system is our flagship product for LaserBodySculpting for the removal of unwanted fat. The
Smartlipo
system was the first laser lipolysis system to offer a minimally invasive procedure for
the removal of unwanted fat. The
Smartlipo
LaserBodySculpting(SM) procedure enables aesthetic surgeons to treat localized deposits of fat. The
Smartlipo
LaserBodySculpting procedure is performed by inserting a small cannula, or metal
tube, containing a laser fiber and placing it under the skin in direct contact with the treatment area. The lasers energy causes the fat cells to rupture and melt. In addition, the lasers energy promotes collagen shrinkage and causes a
tissue tightening effect. LaserBodySculpting is a minimally invasive procedure; therefore, it can be performed under local anesthesia with minimal trauma in comparison to alternative liposuction procedures.
In 2007, we released two new
Smartlipo
workstations, the 10-watt and the 18-watt
Smartlipo
workstations, that are intended for high-volume
aesthetic laser practices, allowing a physician to reduce patient treatment times for laser-assisted liposuction procedures. The 10-watt and 18-watt
Smartlipo
workstations are available as a standalone unit or as an upgrade to existing
systems.
In February 2008, we introduced our
Accolade
system, which is our flagship solution for the removal of pigmented lesions.
The
Accolade
is a high powered 755 nm, Q-switched Alexandrite laser. The combination of various spot sizes and the lasers high repetition rates allow for rapid treatment. The target markets for
Accolade
include Japan, Korea and
China, where dermal lesions such as Nevus of Ota and Nevus of Ito are common.
In April 2008, we introduced the
Smartlipo MPX
workstation, the next generation of our workstations for laser lipolysis.
Smartlipo MPX
is the only FDA-cleared, dual-wavelength laser system designed to efficiently liquefy fat and tighten skin through tissue coagulation. The novel
Smartlipo MPX
platform utilizes our patented MultiPlex technology to combine the benefits of the 1064-nm and 1320-nm wavelengths in one laser output. MultiPlex technology enables the workstations two wavelengths to be blended, or fired
sequentially, for optimal fat liquefaction and skin tightening results through tissue coagulation. The two wavelengths can also be used individually and each offers unique characteristics. The 20 watt 1064-nm wavelength disrupts a broad region of
tissue while heating the treated areas evenly. The 1064-nm wavelength also mediates blood vessel coagulation enhancing hemostasis. The 12 watt 1320-nm wavelength is highly concentrated with less scatter, and is rapidly absorbed by the water in the
tissue. The combination of the two wavelengths creates a blended thermal and photomechanical effect that efficiently liquefies fat and tightens skin through tissue coagulation.
14
Sales and Marketing
We sell our aesthetic treatment systems to the traditional physician customer base of dermatologists and plastic surgeons as well as to the increasing number of non-traditional physician customers who are providing
aesthetic services using laser and light-based technology. Non-traditional physician customers can include primary care physicians, obstetricians and gynecologists.
We target potential customers through office visits, trade shows and trade journals. We also conduct clinical workshops featuring recognized expert panelists and opinion leaders to promote existing and new treatment
techniques using our products. We believe that these workshops enhance customer loyalty and provide us with new sales opportunities. We also use direct mail programs to target specific segments of the market that we seek to access, such as members
of medical societies and attendees at meetings sponsored by medical societies or associations. In addition, we have recently implemented a public relations program that has resulted in sales opportunities based on our products being featured in
several popular U.S. womens magazines
.
We do not provide financing to our customers to purchase our products. If a potential
customer requests financing, we refer the customer to third party financing sources.
Physician Sales
We sell our products to physicians in North America through a direct sales force. Outside of North America, we sell our products to physicians through a
direct sales force in four European countries, Japan and China and through independent distributors in 55 other countries.
We conduct our
own international sales and service operations through wholly-owned subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain, Japan and China. During 2008, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary in Mexico, Cynosure Mexico. In December 2008, we formed
a wholly-owned subsidiary, Cynosure Korea Limited, in Seoul, Korea through the acquisition of the aesthetic laser business of our distributor in Korea (See Note 6). We seek distributors in international markets where we do not believe that a direct
sales presence is warranted or feasible. In those markets, we select distributors that have extensive knowledge of our industry and their local markets. Our distributors sell, install and service our products. We require our distributors to invest
in service training and equipment, to stock and supply maintenance and service parts for our systems, to attend exhibitions and industry meetings and, in some instances, to commit to minimum sales amounts to gain or retain exclusivity. Currently, we
have written distribution agreements with 24 of our 25 third party distributors. Generally, the written agreements with our distributors have terms of between one and two years.
Service and Support
We support our customers with a range of services, including installation and
product training, business and practice development consulting and product service and maintenance. In North America, our field service organization has 23 field service engineers. Outside of North America, our sales and service subsidiaries and our
trained distributors employ 30 field service engineers.
In connection with direct sales of our aesthetic treatment systems, we arrange for
the installation of the system and initial product training. Generally, installation and initial training takes less than three hours. The installation is conducted by our field service engineers. We offer a service that is particularly appealing to
the non-traditional physician customer and aesthetic spa segments of the market, which have less familiarity with the business aspects of laser and light-based aesthetic treatments than dermatologists and cosmetic surgeons. The cost of installation
and initial training for North American purchasers are all included in the purchase price of our systems. We also offer for an additional charge a more comprehensive package of services from pre-qualified third party consultants.
15
We strive to respond to all service calls within 24 hours to minimize disruption of our customers
businesses. We have designed our products in a modular fashion to enable quick and efficient service and support. Specifically, we build these products with several separate components that can easily be removed and replaced when the product is
being serviced. We provide initial warranties on our products to cover parts and service, and we offer extended warranty packages that vary by type of product and level of service desired. Our base warranty covers parts and service for one year. We
offer extended warranty arrangements through service plans. We believe that we have a significant opportunity to increase our recurring customer revenues by increasing the percentage of our customers that enter into service contracts for our
systems.
Research and Development
Our
research and development team consists of 29 employees, including three physicists, with a broad base of experience in lasers and optoelectronics. Our research and development team works closely with opinion leaders and customers, both individually
and through our sponsored seminars, to understand unmet needs and emerging applications in the field of aesthetic skin treatments and to develop new products and improvements to our existing products. They also conduct and coordinate clinical trials
of our products. Our research and development team builds on the significant base of patented and proprietary intellectual property that we have developed in the fields of laser and other light-based technologies since our inception in 1991.
Our research and development expenses were approximately $7.5 million in 2008, $6.8 million in 2007 and $4.7 million in 2006, none of
which was customer sponsored. We do not expect our research and development expenditures to increase in absolute dollars, though we do expect them to increase as a percentage of revenues in 2009.
Manufacturing and Raw Materials
We manufacture all
of our products, other than the
TriActive LaserDermology, Smartlipo
systems and
Affirm CO2
, which are manufactured by El.En. and which we sell and market under our distribution agreement with El.En. We manufacture our products with
components and subassemblies purchased from third party suppliers. Accordingly, our manufacturing operations consist principally of assembly and testing of our systems and integration of our proprietary optics and software.
We design our products, including our
Apogee, Cynergy, Acclaim
and
Affirm
product families, so that they are built in a modular fashion
using fewer components. This approach enables us to manufacture our products more efficiently.
We purchase many of our components and
subassemblies from third party manufacturers on an outsourced basis. We use one third party to assemble and test many of the components and subassemblies for our
Affirm
,
Apogee, Cynergy and Acclaim
and product families. We also depend
exclusively on sole source suppliers for Alexandrite rods, which we use in the manufacture of our
Apogee
products, and for our
SmartCool
treatment cooling systems.
We do not have long-term contracts with our third party manufacturers or sole source suppliers. We generally purchase components and subassemblies as
well as our other supplies on a purchase order basis. If for any reason, our third party manufacturers or sole source suppliers are not willing or able to provide us with components, subassemblies or supplies in a timely fashion, or at all, our
ability to manufacture and sell many of our products could be impaired. To date, we have been able to obtain adequate outsourced manufacturing services and supplies of Alexandrite rods and air cooling systems from our third party manufacturers and
suppliers in a timely manner. We believe that over time alternative component and subassembly manufacturers and suppliers can be identified if our current third party manufacturers and suppliers fail to fulfill our requirements.
16
El.En. Commercial Relationship
The
TriActive LaserDermology, Smartlipo
systems and
Affirm CO2
sold by us were developed, and associated intellectual property rights are owned, by El.En. El.En. manufactures, and we distribute, these
products pursuant to distribution agreements between us and El.En. These agreements provide us with exclusive distribution rights in the United States and Canada for the
TriActive LaserDermology
and
Smartlipo
systems and
Affirm
CO2
. These agreements also provide us with exclusive distribution rights worldwide for the
Smartlipo MPX
systems. The transfer prices for products that we currently distribute under the agreements are specified in the agreement; however,
they may be changed by El.En. at its discretion upon 30 days notice.
El.En. is required to provide us with training, marketing and
other sales support for the products we distribute under these agreements. We are required to use best efforts to sell and promote these products, and we are responsible for obtaining and maintaining regulatory approvals for them. If El.En. wishes
to discontinue producing products that we distribute, it must make reasonable efforts to provide us with one years notice of its plan to do so.
The distribution agreement for the
Smartlipo
systems expires in 2014. The distribution agreement for the
Smartlipo MPX
systems expires in 2016. The distribution agreement relating to the
TriActive
LaserDermology
system will automatically renew for additional one-year terms unless either party provides notice of termination at least six months prior to the expiration of the initial term or any subsequent renewal term. We or El.En. may
terminate the distribution agreements at any time based upon material uncured breaches by, or the insolvency of, the other party. In addition, El.En. may terminate the distribution agreement for the
TriActive LaserDermology
and
Smartlipo
systems if we do not meet annual minimum purchase obligations specified in the agreements.
Patents, Proprietary Technology and Trademarks
Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain proprietary protection for our products, technology and know-how, to
operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others and to prevent others from infringing our proprietary rights. Our policy is to seek to protect our proprietary position by, among other methods, filing United States and foreign patent
applications related to our proprietary technology, inventions and improvements that are important to the development of our business. We also rely on trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovation and in-licensing opportunities to
develop and maintain our proprietary position.
As of December 31, 2008, we owned a total of 36 United States patents, as well as
foreign counterparts to 28 of these patents. Our patent portfolio includes patents and patent applications with claims directed to:
|
|
|
the design and method of use and operation of our pulse dye laser systems;
|
|
|
|
the design and method of use and operation of our Alexandrite laser systems for hair removal;
|
|
|
|
our Multiplex energy delivery system for our pulse dye lasers; and
|
|
|
|
the design of endoscopic laser and light delivery systems.
|
The expiration dates for our issued United States patents and patent application range from 2013 to 2030. Additionally, El.En. has applied for a patent covering the methods of use and operation of the
TriActive LaserDermology
system.
We do not consider any single patent or patent application that we hold to be material to our business.
The patent positions of companies
like ours are generally uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. Our ability to maintain and solidify our proprietary position for our technology will depend on our success in obtaining effective patent claims and enforcing those
claims once granted. We do not know whether any of our patent applications or those patent applications that we license will result in the issuance of any patents. Our issued patents and those that may issue in the future, or those licensed to us,
may be challenged,
17
invalidated or circumvented, which could limit our ability to stop competitors from marketing related products or shorten the term of patent protection that
we may have for our products. In addition, the rights granted under any issued patents may not provide us with competitive advantages against competitors with similar technology. Furthermore, our competitors may independently develop similar
technologies or duplicate any technology developed by us. Because of the extensive time required for development, testing and regulatory review of a potential product, it is possible that, before any of our products under development can be
commercialized, any related patent may expire or remain in force for only a short period following commercialization, thereby reducing any advantage of the patent.
In November 2006, we entered into a patent cross-license agreement with Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., which we refer to as Palomar. Under the cross-license agreement, we obtained a non-exclusive license to
integrate into our products certain hair removal technology covered by specified U.S. and foreign patents held by Palomar and Palomar obtained a non-exclusive license under certain U.S. and foreign patents held by us. In November 2006, we made a
payment to Palomar of $10 million for royalties related to sales prior to October 2006 of hair removal-only systems. In connection with this agreement, we also agreed to pay royalties to Palomar on future sales of certain hair removal-only
products. The royalty rate for sales of hair removal products ranges from 3.75% to 7.5% of net sales beginning October 1, 2006, depending upon product configuration and the number of energy sources. Our revenues from systems that do not include
hair removal capabilities and revenues from service are not subject to any past or future royalties under this agreement.
We rely, in some
circumstances, on trade secrets to protect our technology. Trade secrets, however, are difficult to protect. We seek to protect our proprietary technology and processes, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants,
scientific advisors and other contractors. These agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. To the extent
that our employees, consultants or contractors use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.
We use trademarks on nearly all of our products and believe that having distinctive marks is an
important factor in marketing our products. We have registered our
Cynosure
(R)
, Apogee
(R),
Apogee Elite
(R) and
SmartCool
(R) marks, among others, in the United States. Our other trademarks include
Affinity
(TM)
,
Acclaim
(R)
, Cynergy
(TM)
, CynosureSpa
(TM)
, Smartlipo
(TM)
, Affirm
(TM) and
LaserDermology
(SM). We have also registered some of our marks in a number of foreign countries. In addition, El.En. has registered the
TriActive
(R) and
Smartlipo
®
mark in the United States. Although we have a foreign trademark registration program for selected marks, we may not be able to register or use such
marks in each foreign country in which we seek registration.
Competition
Our industry is subject to intense competition. Our products compete against laser and other light-based products offered by public companies, such as
Candela Corporation, Cutera, Inc., Lumenis Ltd., Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., Syneron Medical Ltd. and Solta Medical, Inc., as well as several smaller specialized private companies, such as Alma Lasers, Ltd. Some of these competitors have
greater financial and human resources than we do and have established reputations, as well as worldwide distribution channels and sales and marketing capabilities that are larger and more established than ours. Additional competitors may enter the
market, and we are likely to compete with new companies in the future. Our products also compete against non-light-based medical products, such as BOTOX(R) and collagen injections, and surgical and non-surgical aesthetic procedures, such as face
lifts, chemical peels, abdominoplasty, liposuction, microdermabrasion, sclerotherapy and electrolysis.
Competition among providers of
aesthetic laser and other light-based products is characterized by significant research and development efforts and rapid technological progress. There are few barriers that would prevent new entrants or existing competitors from developing products
that would compete directly with ours.
18
There are many companies, both public and private, that are developing innovative devices that use both light-based and alternative technologies for
aesthetic and medical applications. Accordingly, our success depends in part on developing and commercializing new and innovative applications of laser and other light-based technology and identifying new markets for and applications of existing
products and technology.
To compete effectively, we have to demonstrate that our products are attractive alternatives to other devices and
treatments by differentiating our products on the basis of performance, reputation, quality of customer support and price. Breadth of product offering is also important. We believe that we perform favorably with respect to each of these factors.
However, we have encountered and expect to continue to encounter potential customers who, due to pre-existing relationships with our competitors, are committed to, or prefer the products offered by these competitors. Potential customers also may
decide not to purchase our products, or to delay such purchases, based on a decision to recoup the cost of expensive products that they may have already purchased from our competitors. In addition, we expect that competitive pressures may result in
price reductions and reduced margins over time for our products.
Government Regulation
Our products are medical devices subject to extensive and rigorous regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, as well as other
regulatory bodies. FDA regulations govern the following activities that we perform and will continue to perform to ensure that medical devices distributed domestically are safe and effective for their intended uses.
FDAs Regulation of Manufacturing
The FDA requires that we manufacture our products in accordance with its Quality System Regulation, or QSR. The QSR covers the methods and documentation of the design, testing, control, manufacturing, labeling, quality assurance, packaging,
storage and shipping of our products. The FDA enforces the QSR through periodic announced and unannounced inspections. Our last such inspection was in May 2008.
Our failure to maintain compliance with the QSR requirements could result in the shut down of, or restrictions on, our manufacturing operations and the recall or seizure of our products, which would have a material
adverse effect on our business. In the event that one of our suppliers fails to maintain compliance with our quality requirements, we may have to qualify a new supplier and could experience manufacturing delays as a result.
We maintain quality assurance and quality management certifications to enable us to market our products in the member states of the European Union, the
European Free Trade Association and some countries that have entered into Mutual Recognition Agreements with the European Union. In November 1998, our former facility was awarded the ISO 9001 and EN 46001 certifications. In October 2003, we received
our ISO 9001 updated certification as well as our certification for ISO 13485, which replaced our EN 46001 certification.
FDAs
Premarket Clearance and Approval Requirements
Unless an exemption applies, each medical device we wish to distribute commercially
in the United States requires either prior 510(k) clearance or premarket approval from the FDA. The FDA classifies medical devices into one of three classes. Devices deemed to pose lower risks are placed in either class I or II, which requires the
manufacturer to submit to the FDA a premarket notification requesting permission to distribute the device commercially. This process is generally known as 510(k) clearance. Class I devices are subject to general controls such as labeling and
adherence to FDAs QSR. Class II devices are subject to special controls such as performance standards and FDA guidelines as well as general controls. The FDA exempts some low risk devices from premarket notification requirements and the
requirement of compliance with certain provisions of the QSR. The FDA places devices in class III, requiring premarket approval, if insufficient information exists to determine that the application of general controls or special controls are
sufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety
19
and effectiveness and they are life-sustaining, life-supporting or implantable devices, or devices deemed not substantially equivalent to a previously
cleared 510(k) device or to a preamendment class III device in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, for which premarket approval applications have not been required. All of our current products are class II devices. Both
premarket notifications and premarket approval applications when submitted to FDA must be accompanied by a user fee, unless exempt.
510(k) Clearance
When a 510(k) clearance is required, we must submit a premarket notification to the FDA
demonstrating that our proposed device is substantially equivalent to a previously cleared 510(k) device or a device that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 for which the FDA has not yet called for the submission of premarket
approval applications, or premarket approval. By regulation, the FDA must clear or deny a 510(k) premarket notification within 90 days of submission of the application. As a practical matter, clearance often takes significantly longer. The FDA may
require further information, including clinical data, to make a determination regarding substantial equivalence.
Laser devices used for
aesthetic procedures, such as hair removal, have generally qualified for clearance under 510(k) procedures.
Premarket Approval
If the device cannot be cleared through the 510(k) process, the sponsor must submit a premarket approval application, which is
known as a PMA. The sponsor must support the PMA with extensive data, including but not limited to, technical, preclinical, clinical trials, manufacturing and labeling to demonstrate to the FDAs satisfaction the safety and effectiveness of the
device.
No device that we have developed has required premarket approval, nor do we currently expect that any future device or indication
will require premarket approval.
Product Modifications
After a device receives 510(k) clearance or a PMA approval, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would
constitute a major change in its intended use, will require a new clearance or approval. The FDA requires each manufacturer to make this determination initially, but the FDA can review any such decision and can disagree with a manufacturers
determination. We have modified aspects of various products since receiving regulatory clearance and believe that new 510(k) clearances are not required for these modifications. If the FDA disagrees with our determination not to seek a new 510(k)
clearance or PMA approval, the FDA may retroactively require us to seek 510(k) clearance or premarket approval. The FDA could also require us to cease marketing and distributing the modified device, and the recall any sold devices, until 510(k)
clearance or premarket approval is obtained. Also, in these circumstances, we may be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties.
Clinical Trials
We perform clinical trials to provide data to support the FDA clearance process for our products and
for use in our sales and marketing efforts. Human clinical studies are generally required in connection with approval of class III devices and may be required for clearance of class I and II devices. When FDA clearance or approval of a device
requires human clinical trials, and if the device presents a significant risk, as defined by the FDA, to human health, the FDA requires the device sponsor to file an investigational device exemption, or IDE, application with the FDA and
obtain IDE approval prior to commencing the human clinical trials. The sponsor must support the IDE application with appropriate data, such as animal and laboratory testing results, showing that it is safe to test the device in humans and that the
testing protocol is scientifically sound. The sponsor also must obtain approval from the institutional review board overseeing the clinical trial.
20
To date, we have not submitted any IDEs because we believe our devices present only
non-significant risks and, therefore, do not require IDE submission to the FDA. Instead, only institutional review board approval is required. Future clinical trials of our products may require that we submit and obtain approval of an
IDE from the FDA prior to commencing clinical trials. The FDA, and the institutional review board at each institution at which a clinical trial is being performed, may suspend a clinical trial at any time for various reasons, including a belief that
the subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk.
All clinical investigations of devices to determine safety and
effectiveness must be conducted in accordance with the FDAs IDE regulations which govern investigational device labeling, prohibit promotion of the investigational device, and specify an array of recordkeeping, reporting and monitoring
responsibilities of study sponsors and study investigators. Clinical trials must further comply with FDA regulations for institutional review board approval and for informed consent. Required records and reports are subject to inspection by the FDA.
The results of clinical testing may be unfavorable or inconclusive or, even if the intended safety and effectiveness success criteria are achieved, may not be considered sufficient for the FDA to grant approval or clearance of a product. The
commencement or completion of any of our clinical trials may be delayed or halted, or be inadequate to support approval of a PMA application, or 510(k) clearance, for numerous reasons, including, but not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
patients do not enroll in clinical trials or there is not patient follow-up at the rate we expect;
|
|
|
|
patients do not comply with trial protocols;
|
|
|
|
patients experience adverse side effects;
|
|
|
|
institutional review boards and third party clinical investigators may delay or reject our trial protocol;
|
|
|
|
third party clinical investigators decline to participate in a trial or do not perform a trial on our anticipated schedule or consistent with the clinical trial
protocol, good clinical practices, or other FDA requirements;
|
|
|
|
regulatory inspections of our clinical trials or manufacturing facilities, which may, among other things, require us to undertake corrective action or suspend or
terminate our clinical trials or invalidate our clinical trials; and
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions.
|
Our clinical trials may not generate favorable data to support any PMA or 510(k), and we may not be able to obtain such approvals or clearances on a timely basis, or at all. Delays in receipt of or failure to receive
such approvals or clearances or failure to comply with existing or future regulatory requirements would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Even if granted, the approvals or clearances may
include significant limitations on the intended use and indications for use for which our products may be marketed.
Clinical studies
conducted on 510(k) cleared devices, when used or investigated in accordance with the devices labeled instructions, are exempt from most of the FDAs IDE requirements.
Pervasive and Continuing Regulation
After a device is placed on the market, numerous regulatory requirements apply. These include:
|
|
|
establishment registration and device listing;
|
|
|
|
the quality system regulation, which requires manufacturers, including third-party manufacturers, to follow stringent design, testing, control, documentation and
other quality assurance procedures during all aspects of the manufacturing process;
|
|
|
|
labeling regulations and FDA prohibitions against the promotion of products for uncleared, unapproved or off-label uses, and other requirements related
to promotional activities;
|
21
|
|
|
medical device reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA if their device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury
or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur;
|
|
|
|
corrections and removal reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA field corrections and product recalls or removals if undertaken to
reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that may present a risk to health; and
|
|
|
|
post-market surveillance regulations, which apply when necessary to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and effectiveness data for the device.
|
The FDA may require us to maintain a system for tracking our products through the chain of distribution to the patient
level. The FDA has broad post-market and regulatory enforcement powers. We are subject to unannounced inspections by the FDA to determine our compliance with the QSR and other regulations. These inspections may include the manufacturing facilities
of our subcontractors. Thus, we must continue to spend time, money and effort to maintain compliance. The FDA inspected our current manufacturing facility in May 2008 and we believe that we are in substantial compliance with the QSR. Since 1994, we
have received five untitled letters from the FDA regarding alleged violations caused by our promotional activities. We have responded to these letters and the FDA found our responses acceptable.
We are also regulated under the Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act, which requires laser products to comply with performance standards,
including design and operation requirements. The law also requires manufacturers to certify in product labeling and in reports to the FDA that their products comply with all such standards. The law and applicable federal regulations also require
laser manufacturers to file new product and annual reports, maintain manufacturing, testing and sales records, and report product defects. Various warning labels must be affixed and certain protective devices installed, depending on the class of the
product.
Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in enforcement action by the FDA, which may include any of
the following sanctions:
|
|
|
untitled letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;
|
|
|
|
repair, replacement, refunds, recall or seizure of our products;
|
|
|
|
operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of production;
|
|
|
|
refusing or delaying our requests for 510(k) clearance or premarket approval of new products or new intended uses;
|
|
|
|
withdrawing 510(k) clearance or premarket approvals that are already granted; and
|
The FDA also
has the authority to require us to repair, replace or refund the cost of any medical device that we have manufactured or distributed. If any of these events were to occur, they could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are also subject to a wide range of federal, state and local laws and regulations, including those related to the environment, health and safety, land
use and quality assurance. We believe that compliance with these laws and regulations as currently in effect will not have a material adverse effect on our capital expenditures, earnings and competitive and financial position.
International
International
sales of medical devices are subject to foreign governmental regulations, which vary substantially from country to country. The time required to obtain clearance or approval by a foreign country may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA
clearance or approval, and the requirements may be different.
22
The primary regulatory environment in Europe is that of the European Union, which consists of 27
countries encompassing most of the major countries in Europe. The European Union has adopted numerous directives, and European Standardization Committees have promulgated voluntary standards, regulating the design, manufacture, clinical trials,
labeling and adverse event reporting for medical devices. Devices that comply with the requirements of a relevant directive will be entitled to bear CE conformity marking, indicating that the device conforms to the essential requirements of the
applicable directives and, accordingly, can be commercially distributed throughout the member states of the European Union and the member states of the European Free Trade Association, including Switzerland.
The method of assessing conformity varies depending on the type and class of the product, but normally involves a combination of self-assessment by the
manufacturer and a third party assessment by a Notified Body, an independent and neutral institution appointed by a country to conduct the conformity assessment. This third party assessment may consist of an audit of the manufacturers quality
system and specific testing of the manufacturers device. An assessment by a Notified Body in one member state of the European Union or the European Free Trade Association is required in order for a manufacturer to distribute the product
commercially throughout these countries. ISO 9001 and ISO 13845 certification are voluntary harmonized standards. Compliance establishes the presumption of conformity with the essential requirements for a CE marking. In November 1998, our former
facility was awarded the ISO 9001 and EN 46001 certifications. In October 2003, we received our ISO 9001 updated certification as well as our certification for ISO 13485, which replaced our EN 46001 certification.
Employees
As of December 31, 2008, we had 288
employees, including 132 employees in sales and marketing functions, 29 employees in research, development and engineering functions, 88 employees in manufacturing and service functions and 39 employees in general and administrative functions. We
believe that our future success will depend in part on our continued ability to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel. None of our employees is represented by a labor union, and we believe our employee relations are good.
23
The following
important factors, among others, could cause our actual operating results to differ materially from those indicated or suggested by forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report or presented elsewhere by management from time to time.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
We have a history of operating losses, and we may not maintain profitability.
Although we were profitable in 2004,
2005, 2007 and 2008, we incurred operating losses of approximately $0.7 million in 2006. Although we achieved net income of $10.2 million in 2008, we incurred a net loss of $2.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2008. We may not be able to sustain or
increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. If we are unable to maintain profitability, the market value of our stock may decline, and you could lose all or a part of your investment.
Macroeconomic conditions have led, and are likely to continue to lead, to decreased demand for our products.
The aesthetic laser and light-based treatment system industry in which we operate is particularly vulnerable to economic trends. Most treatments
performed using our products are elective procedures, the cost of which must be borne by the patient and are not reimbursable through government or private health insurance. Accordingly, the decision to undergo a treatment in which one of our
products is used is affected by the willingness of an individual to pay for such a treatment.
Consumer demand, and therefore our business,
is sensitive to a number of factors that affect consumer spending, including political and economic conditions, health of credit markets, disposable consumer income levels, consumer debt levels, interest rates and consumer confidence. Because
consumer demand has dramatically decreased in recent months, practitioners demand for our products has also decreased, and we expect that it will continue to do so. Decreased demand for aesthetic procedures and for our products has had, and is
likely to continue to have, an adverse effect on our operating results.
We may be exposed to credit risk of customers that have been
adversely affected by weakened markets
Due to adverse general business conditions, such as the recent turmoil in the financial
markets, the creditworthiness of our customers and potential customers may deteriorate over time, which may cause them to cancel or delay their purchase of our products. In addition, we may be subject to increased risk of non-payment of our accounts
receivables. We may also be adversely affected by bankruptcies or other business failures of our customers and potential customers. A significant delay in the collection of funds or a reduction of funds collected may impact our liquidity or result
in bad debts.
Our business and operations experienced rapid growth from 2004 through 2007, however, in 2008, our quarterly growth
rate slowed over the first three quarters, and in the fourth quarter, we experienced a decrease in revenue. If we fail to effectively manage our growth or fluctuations in our business, our business and operating results could be harmed.
We experienced several years of significant growth in our operations and the number of our employees. For example, our revenue increased
from $27.1 million in 2003 to $124.3 million in 2007, and $139.7 million in 2008. However, during 2008, our revenue growth began to slow during the first three quarters, and our revenue in the fourth quarter of 2008 was below our revenue in the
fourth quarter of 2007. We began 2003 with 138 employees and had 288 as of December 31, 2008. During the fourth quarter of 2008, due to the decrease in our revenue, we reduced our worldwide headcount by 17%, decreased spending on various
programs and implemented general cost-control initiatives intended to reduce our 2009 operating expenses. These fluctuations
24
have placed significant demands on our management, as well as our financial and operational resources. If we do not effectively manage our business
fluctuations, the efficiency of our operations and the quality of our products could suffer, which could adversely affect our business and operating results. To effectively manage these fluctuations, we will need to continue to:
|
|
|
implement appropriate operational, financial and management controls, systems and procedures;
|
|
|
|
expand variable manufacturing capacity and scale of production;
|
|
|
|
expand our sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure and capabilities; and
|
|
|
|
provide adequate training and supervision to maintain high quality standards.
|
Our competition may prevent us from achieving further market penetration or improving operating results.
Competition in the aesthetic laser industry is intense. Our products compete against products offered by public companies, such as Candela Corporation,
Cutera, Inc., Lumenis Ltd., Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., Syneron Medical Ltd. and Solta Medical, Inc., as well as several smaller specialized private companies, such as Alma Lasers, Ltd. Some of these competitors have greater financial and
human resources than we do and have established reputations, as well as worldwide distribution channels and sales and marketing capabilities that are larger and more established than ours. Additional competitors may enter the market, and we are
likely to compete with new companies in the future.
We also face competition from medical products, such as BOTOX(R) and collagen
injections, and surgical and non-surgical aesthetic procedures, such as face lifts, sclerotherapy, electrolysis, microdermabrasion and chemical peels. We may also face competition from manufacturers of pharmaceutical and other products that have not
yet been developed. As a result of competition with these companies, products and procedures, we could experience loss of market share and decreasing revenue as well as reduced prices and profit margins, any of which would harm our business and
operating results.
Our ability to compete effectively depends upon our ability to distinguish our company and our products from our
competitors and their products. Factors affecting our competitive position include:
|
|
|
product performance and design;
|
|
|
|
ability to sell products tailored to meet the applications needs of clients and patients;
|
|
|
|
quality of customer support;
|
|
|
|
sales, marketing and distribution capabilities;
|
|
|
|
success and timing of new product development and introductions; and
|
|
|
|
intellectual property protection.
|
If we fail to obtain Alexandrite rods or our air cooling system from our sole suppliers, our ability to manufacture and sell our products and components would be impaired.
We use Alexandrite rods to manufacture the lasers for our
Apogee
products. We depend exclusively on Northrop Grumman SYNOPTICS to supply
Alexandrite rods to us, and we are aware of no alternative supplier meeting our quality standards. We offer our
SmartCool
(R) treatment cooling systems for use with our laser aesthetic treatment systems, and we depend exclusively on Zimmer
Elektromedizin GmbH to supply
SmartCool
systems to us. Both Alexandrite lasers and our
SmartCool
systems are important to our business.
25
We do not have long-term arrangements with Northrop Grumman SYNOPTICS or Zimmer Elektromedizin for the
supply of Alexandrite rods or
SmartCool
systems, but instead purchase from them on a purchase order basis. Northrop Grumman SYNOPTICS and Zimmer Elektromedizin are not required, and may not be able or willing, to meet our future requirements
at current prices, or at all. Any extended interruption in our supplies of Alexandrite rods or our
SmartCool
treatment cooling systems could materially harm our business.
If we do not continue to develop and commercialize new products and identify new markets for our products and technology, we may not remain
competitive, and our revenues and operating results could suffer.
The aesthetic laser and light-based treatment system industry is
subject to continuous technological development and product innovation. If we do not continue to be innovative in the development of new products and applications, our competitive position will likely deteriorate as other companies successfully
design and commercialize new products and applications. Accordingly, our success depends in part on developing new and innovative applications of laser and other light-based technology and identifying new markets for and applications of existing
products and technology. If we are unable to develop and commercialize new products and identify new markets for our products and technology, our products and technology could become obsolete and our revenues and operating results could be adversely
affected.
To remain competitive, we must:
|
|
|
develop or acquire new technologies that either add to or significantly improve our current products;
|
|
|
|
convince our target customers that our new products or product upgrades would be attractive revenue-generating additions to their practices;
|
|
|
|
sell our products to non-traditional customers, including primary care physicians, gynecologists and other specialists;
|
|
|
|
identify new markets and emerging technological trends in our target markets and react effectively to technological changes; and
|
|
|
|
maintain effective sales and marketing strategies.
|
If our new products do not gain market acceptance, our revenues and operating results could suffer.
The commercial success of the products and technology we develop will depend upon the acceptance of these products by providers of aesthetic procedures and their patients and clients. It is difficult for us to predict how successful
recently introduced products, or products we are currently developing, will be over the long term. If the products we develop do not gain market acceptance, our revenues and operating results could suffer.
We expect that many of the products we develop will be based upon new technologies or new applications of existing technologies. It may be difficult for
us to achieve market acceptance of some of our products, particularly the first products that we introduce to the market based on new technologies or new applications of existing technologies.
If demand for our aesthetic treatment systems by non-traditional physician customers and spas does not increase, our revenues will suffer and our
business will be harmed.
The percentage of revenues from non-traditional physician customers and spa purchasers of our products
increased significantly beginning in 2004. We believe, and our growth expectations assume, that we and other companies selling lasers and other light-based aesthetic treatment systems have not fully penetrated these markets and that we will continue
to receive a significant percentage of our revenues from selling to these markets. If our expectations as to the size of these markets and our ability to sell our products to participants in these markets are not correct, our revenues will suffer
and our business will be harmed.
26
We rely upon third party suppliers for the components and subassemblies of many of our products,
making us vulnerable to supply shortages and price fluctuations, which could harm our business.
Many of the components and
subassemblies that comprise our aesthetic treatment systems are currently manufactured for us by a limited number of suppliers. In addition, one third party supplier assembles and tests many of the components and subassemblies for our
Apogee,
Cynergy, Affirm
and
Acclaim
product families. We do not have long-term contracts with any of these third parties, including the third party supplier that assembles many of our components and subassemblies, for the supply of parts or
services. Any interruption in the supply of components or subassemblies, or our inability to obtain substitute components or subassemblies from alternate sources at acceptable prices in a timely manner, or our inability to obtain assembly and
testing services, could impair our ability to meet the demand of our customers, which would have an adverse effect on our business and operating results.
We sell our products and services through subsidiaries and distributors in numerous international markets. Our operating results may suffer if we are unable to manage our international operations effectively.
We sell our products and services through subsidiaries and distributors in 61 foreign countries, and we therefore are subject to
risks associated with having international operations. Sales of our products outside of North America accounted for 34% of our revenue for 2008, 36% of our revenue for 2007 and 42% of our revenue in 2006.
Our international sales are subject to a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
foreign certification and regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing our foreign operations;
|
|
|
|
import and export controls; and
|
|
|
|
political and economic instability.
|
Revenue from our international sales could be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which would cause our operating results to suffer.
We face risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Revenues outside of North America that were recorded in U.S. dollars represented
approximately 44% of our total 2008 revenues outside of North America. Substantially all of the remaining 56% of our total 2008 revenues outside of North America were sales in euros, British pounds, Japanese yen and Chinese yuan renminbi. Since we
report our financial position and results of operations in U.S. dollars, our reported results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in the exchange rate between these currencies and the U.S. dollar. We have not historically engaged in
hedging activities relating to our non-U.S. dollar operations. We may incur negative foreign currency translation charges as a result of changes in currency exchange rates, which could cause our operating results to suffer.
We rely on third party distributors to market, sell and service a significant portion of our products. If these distributors do not commit the
necessary resources to effectively market, sell and service our products or if our relationships with these distributors are disrupted, our business and operating results may be harmed.
In North America, the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, France, Japan and China, we sell our products through our internal sales organization. Outside of
these markets, we sell our products through third party distributors. Our sales and marketing success in these other markets depends on these distributors, in particular their sales and service expertise and relationships with the customers in the
marketplace. Sales of our aesthetic treatment systems by third party distributors represented 16% of our product revenue in 2008, 17% of our product revenue in 2007 and 18% of our product revenue in 2006. We do not control these distributors, and
they may not be successful in marketing our products. Third party distributors may terminate their relationships with
27
us, or fail to commit the necessary resources to market and sell our products to the level of our expectations. Currently, we have written distributor
agreements in place with 24 of our 25 third party distributors. The third party distributors with which we do not have written distributor agreements may terminate their relationships with us and stop selling and servicing our products with little
or no notice. If current or future third party distributors do not perform adequately, or if we fail to maintain our existing relationships with these distributors or fail to recruit and retain distributors in particular geographic areas, our
revenue from international sales may be adversely affected and our operating results could suffer.
Because we do not require
training for users of our non-invasive products, and sell these products to non-physicians, there exists an increased potential for misuse of these products, which could harm our reputation and our business.
Federal regulations allow us to sell our products to or on the order of practitioners licensed by law to use or order the use of a prescription device.
The definition of licensed practitioners varies from state to state. As a result, our products may be purchased or operated by physicians with varying levels of training and, in many states, by non-physicians, including nurse
practitioners, chiropractors and technicians. Outside the United States, many jurisdictions do not require specific qualifications or training for purchasers or operators of our products. We do not supervise the procedures performed with our
non-invasive products, nor do we require that direct medical supervision occur. We and our distributors offer product training sessions, but neither we nor our distributors require purchasers or operators of our non-invasive products to attend
training sessions. The lack of required training and the purchase and use of our non-invasive products by non-physicians may result in product misuse and adverse treatment outcomes, which could harm our reputation and expose us to costly product
liability litigation.
Product liability suits could be brought against us due to defective design, material or workmanship or due to
misuse of our products. These lawsuits could be expensive and time consuming and result in substantial damages to us and increases in our insurance rates.
If our products are defectively designed, manufactured or labeled, contain defective components or are misused, we may become subject to substantial and costly litigation by our customers or their patients or clients.
Misusing our products or failing to adhere to operating guidelines for our products can cause severe burns or other damage to the eyes, skin or other tissue. We are routinely involved in claims related to the use of our products. Product liability
claims could divert managements attention from our core business, be expensive to defend and result in sizable damage awards against us. Our current insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover these claims. Moreover, in the future, we
may not be able to obtain insurance in amount or scope sufficient to provide us with adequate coverage against potential liabilities. Any product liability claims brought against us, with or without merit, could increase our product liability
insurance rates or prevent us from securing continuing coverage, could harm our reputation in the industry and reduce product sales. We would need to pay any product losses in excess of our insurance coverage out of cash reserves, harming our
financial condition and adversely affecting our operating results.
We may incur substantial expenses if our past practices are shown
to have violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
We previously used facsimiles to disseminate information about our clinical
workshops to large numbers of customers and potential customers. These facsimiles were transmitted by third parties retained by us, and were sent to recipients whose facsimile numbers were supplied by us as well as other recipients whose facsimile
numbers we purchased from other sources. In May 2005, we stopped sending unsolicited facsimiles to customers and potential customers.
Under the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA, recipients of unsolicited facsimile advertisements are entitled to damages of up to $500 per facsimile for inadvertent violations and up to $1,500 per facsimile for
knowing or willful violations. Recipients of unsolicited facsimile advertisements may seek
28
enforcement of the TCPA in state courts. The TCPA also permits states to initiate a civil action in a federal district court to enforce the TCPA against a
party who engages in a pattern or practice of violations of the TCPA. In addition, complaints may be filed with the Federal Communications Commission, which has the power to assess penalties against parties for violations of the TCPA.
In 2005, Dr. Ari Weitzner, individually and as putative representative of a purported class, filed a complaint against us under the TCPA in
Massachusetts Superior Court in Middlesex County seeking monetary damages, injunctive relief, costs and attorneys fees. The complaint alleges that we violated the TCPA by sending unsolicited advertisements by facsimile to the plaintiff and other
recipients without the prior express invitation or permission of the recipients. Based on discovery in this matter, the plaintiff alleges that approximately three million facsimiles were sent on our behalf by a third party to approximately 100,000
individuals. On February 6, 2008, several months after the close of discovery, the plaintiff served a motion for class certification, which we opposed. The court held a hearing on the plaintiffs class certification motion on June 17,
2008. We are not currently able to estimate the amount or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome of this lawsuit.
On
July 16, 2008, we commenced a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts requesting a declaration that Dr. Weitzners and the putative class claims are covered under our general
liability insurance policies. On August 11, 2008, our insurance company filed an Answer and Counterclaim against us seeking a declaration that our policy does not provide coverage for Dr. Weitzners claims. On August 19, 2008, we
filed a reply to the counterclaim. The insurance company filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on December 15, 2008, and we cross moved for Summary Judgment on January 15, 2009. The court held a hearing on the motions on February 26,
2009, and took the matter under advisement. We are not able to estimate the amount or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome of the lawsuit as the matter is still in the early stages of the proceedings.
We are vigorously defending the Weitzner lawsuit, but litigation is subject to numerous uncertainties and we are unable to predict the ultimate outcome
of this matter. Even if we prevail in this lawsuit, other individual or class action claims may be brought against us alleging past violations of the TCPA. Moreover, the amount of any potential liability in connection with this lawsuit or other
possible lawsuits will depend, to a large extent, on whether a class in a class action lawsuit is certified and, if one is certified, on the scope of the class, neither of which we can predict at this time.
We have not recorded a liability related to this lawsuit or other possible future lawsuits. However, we may determine in the future that an accrual is
required, and we may be required to pay damages in respect of this lawsuit or other possible future lawsuits arising out of our past transmission of facsimiles, any of which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows
and financial condition. Regardless of the outcome, this lawsuit or other possible future lawsuits may cause us to incur significant expenses and divert the attention of our management and key personnel from our business operations.
Our financial results may fluctuate from quarter to quarter, which makes our results difficult to predict and could cause our results to fall short
of expectations.
Our financial results may fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control.
For these reasons, comparing our financial results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful, and you should not rely on our past results as an indication of our future performance. Our future quarterly and annual expenses as a percentage of
our revenues may be significantly different from those we have recorded in the past or which we expect for the future. Our financial results in some quarters may fall below our expectations or the expectations of market analysts or investors. Any of
these events could cause our stock price to fall. Each of the risk factors listed in this Risk Factors section, and the following factors, may adversely affect our financial results:
|
|
|
continued availability of attractive equipment leasing terms for our customers, which may be negatively influenced by interest rate increases or lack of available
credit;
|
29
|
|
|
increases in the length of our sales cycle; and
|
|
|
|
reductions in the efficiency of our manufacturing processes.
|
If there is not sufficient demand for the procedures performed with our products, practitioner demand for our products could decline, which would adversely affect our operating results.
Most procedures performed using our aesthetic treatment systems are elective procedures that are not reimbursable through government or private health
insurance. The cost of these elective procedures must be borne by the patient. As a result, the decision to undergo a procedure that utilizes our products may be influenced by a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
patient awareness of procedures and treatments;
|
|
|
|
the cost, safety and effectiveness of the procedure and of alternative treatments;
|
|
|
|
the success of our and our customers sales and marketing efforts to purchasers of these procedures; and
|
|
|
|
consumer confidence, which may be affected by economic and other conditions.
|
If there is not sufficient demand for the procedures performed with our products, practitioner demand for our products would be reduced, which would
adversely affect our operating results.
We may be unable to attract and retain management and other personnel we need to succeed.
Our success depends on the services of our senior management and other key research and development, manufacturing, sales and
marketing employees. The loss of the services of one or more of these employees could have a material adverse effect on our business. We consider retaining Michael R. Davin, our president and chief executive officer, to be key to our efforts to
develop, sell and market our products and remain competitive. We have entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Davin; however, the employment agreement is terminable by him on short notice and may not ensure his continued service with our
company. Our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled employees. We cannot be certain that we will be able to do so.
Any acquisitions that we make could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition.
From time to time, we evaluate potential strategic acquisitions of complementary businesses, products or technologies, as well as consider joint ventures
and other collaborative projects. We may not be able to identify appropriate acquisition candidates or strategic partners, or successfully negotiate, finance or integrate any businesses, products or technologies that we acquire. We do not have any
experience with acquiring companies or products. Any acquisition we pursue could diminish our cash available to us for other uses or be dilutive to our stockholders, and could divert managements time and resources from our core operations.
El.En. has substantial control over us. In addition, El.En. and our executive officers and directors have the ability to control all
matters submitted to stockholders for approval.
In addition to the factors discussed below regarding El.En.s ability to
control the election of a majority of the members of our board of directors, El.En. and our executive officers and directors, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 23% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, if these stockholders
were to act together, they would be able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval. For example, these persons could control any amendment of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and approval of any merger,
consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. This concentration of voting power could delay or prevent an acquisition of our company on terms that other stockholders may desire. Please also see the discussion under Risks
Related to Our Relationship with El.En.El.En. has substantial control over us and could delay or prevent a change of control.
30
Provisions in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law may delay or prevent attempts
by our stockholders to change our management and hinder efforts to acquire a controlling interest in us.
Provisions of our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your
shares. These provisions may also prevent or frustrate attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our management. These provisions include:
|
|
|
a dual class capital structure that allows El.En. to control the election of a majority of the members of our board of directors;
|
|
|
|
the classification of the members of our directors who are elected by holders of our class A common stock and class B common stock, voting together as a single
class;
|
|
|
|
limitations on the removal of directors who are elected by holders of our class A common stock and class B common stock, voting together as a single class;
|
|
|
|
advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations;
|
|
|
|
the inability of class A stockholders to act by written consent or to call special meetings; and
|
|
|
|
the ability of our board of directors to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could be used to
institute a poison pill that would work to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer, effectively preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our board of directors.
|
The affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of our shares of capital stock entitled to vote is necessary to amend or repeal the above provisions
of our certificate of incorporation, and the right of the holders of shares of our class B common stock to elect a majority of the members of our board of directors may not be modified without the approval of the holders of at least a majority of
the shares of our class B common stock outstanding. In addition, absent approval of our board of directors, our bylaws may only be amended or repealed by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the voting power of our shares of
capital stock entitled to vote and the affirmative vote of holders of at least a majority of the shares of class B common stock outstanding.
In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder, generally a person which together with its
affiliates owns or within the last three years has owned 15% of our voting stock, for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a
prescribed manner. Accordingly, Section 203 may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company.
Our stock
price may be volatile.
Our class A common stock price may be volatile. The stock market in general has experienced extreme
volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. The market price for our class A common stock may be influenced by many factors, including:
|
|
|
the success of competitive products or technologies;
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries;
|
|
|
|
developments or disputes concerning patents or other proprietary rights;
|
|
|
|
the recruitment or departure of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;
|
|
|
|
market conditions in the our industry and issuance of new or changed securities analysts reports or recommendations; and
|
|
|
|
general economic, industry and market conditions.
|
31
Due to our current inability to sell certain of our Auction Rate Securities, the securities may
experience temporary decline in value, and funds associated with the securities may be inaccessible in excess of 12 months, resulting in an adverse impact to our income and results of operations.
Our marketable securities portfolio, which totaled $44.2 million at December 31, 2008, included Auction Rate Securities, or ARS, with a par value of
$21.1 million from various issuers collateralized by student loans and municipal debt. ARSs are securities with long-term contractual maturities but with interest rates that are reset every seven to 35 days by auctions. At the end of each reset
period, investors can sell or continue to hold the securities at par. On February 13, 2008, certain ARSs that we hold experienced failed auctions that limited the liquidity of these securities. Based on current market conditions, it is likely
that auction failures will continue.
Our auction rate securities are managed by UBS Financial Services Inc. (UBS). On November 3,
2008, we agreed to accept Auction Rate Security Rights (the Rights) from UBS offered through a prospectus filed on October 7, 2008. The Rights permit us to sell, or put, our auction rate securities back to UBS at par value at any time during
the period from June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012. We expect to exercise our ARS Rights and put our auction rate securities back to UBS on June 30, 2010, the earliest date allowable under the Rights offering. Although we have
accepted the Right, there is no guarantee that UBS will have the credit ability to honor these Rights in the future when they become exercisable.
As a result of our acceptance of the Rights, We have elected to reclassify our investments in auction rate securities as trading securities, as defined by SFAS No. 115, on the date of our acceptance of the Rights. As a result, we are
required to assess the fair value of these two separate assets; auction rate securities and the Rights; and record changes through the statement of operations each period until the Rights are exercised and the ARS are redeemed. There is no guarantee
that the fair value of the Rights will completely offset the discount on the fair value of the ARS as the assumptions used to value these assets will change over time, including the ability of UBS to honor the Rights. Therefore, we may be required
to recognize a loss in our statement of operations until we can exercise our right to redeem these ARS at par value beginning on June 30, 2010. Although we have the ability and intent to hold these securities until a successful auction,
redemption or the exercise of the Rights, we have classified the ARS at fair value of $16.8 million, or a discount of $4.3 million from par, and the Rights at fair value of $4.3 million in long-term investments and related financial instruments at
December 31, 2008, and recorded a net loss of approximately $43,000 through our statement of operations.
During the year ended
December 31, 2008, certain investments in ARS were successfully called at full par value and we received cash proceeds of approximately $8.2 million. In January 2009, an additional $1.7 million in cash proceeds was received by us related to
certain investments in ARSs that were successfully called at full par value.
Risks Related to Our Relationship with El.En.
El.En. has substantial control over us and could delay or prevent a change of control.
El.En., our largest stockholder, is able to control the election of a majority of the members of our board of directors. El.En. owns approximately 100% of
our outstanding class B common stock, which comprises 23% of our aggregate outstanding common. Until El.En. beneficially owns less than 20% of the aggregate number of shares of our class A common stock and class B common stock outstanding or less
than 50% of the number of shares of our class B common stock outstanding, El.En., as holder of a majority of the shares of our class B common stock, will have the right:
|
|
|
to elect a majority of the members of our board of directors;
|
|
|
|
to approve amendments to our bylaws adopted by our class A and class B stockholders, voting as a single class; and
|
32
|
|
|
to approve amendments to any provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation relating to the rights of holders of common stock, the powers, election and
classification of the board of directors, corporate opportunities and the rights of holders of class A common stock and class B common stock to elect and remove directors, act by written consent and call special meetings of stockholders.
|
In addition, the holders of shares of our class B common stock will vote with our class A stockholders for the election
of the remaining directors.
Because El.En. is the holder of a majority of the shares of our class B common stock, El.En.s approval
will be required for any of the actions described above. In addition, because El.En. will be able to control the election of a majority of our board, and because of its substantial holdings of our capital stock, El.En. will likely have the ability
to delay or prevent a change of control of our company that may be favored by other directors or stockholders and otherwise exercise substantial control over all corporate actions requiring board or stockholder approval.
El.En. and its subsidiaries market and sell products that compete with our products, and any competition by El.En. could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
El.En. is a leading laser manufacturer in Europe and a leading light-based medical device manufacturer
worldwide. El.En. and its subsidiaries develop and produce laser systems with scientific, industrial, commercial and medical applications. Although we have exclusive North American distribution rights for our
TriActive LaserDermology, Affirm CO2
and
Smartlipo
products and exclusive worldwide distribution rights for our
Smartlipo MPX
product, El.En. may compete with us in North America with its other products. In the event that our distribution agreements with El.En.
terminate, El.En. may compete with us in North America with these products. El.En. markets, sells, promotes and licenses products that compete with our products outside of North America. Our business could be materially and adversely affected by
competition from El.En.
Conflicts of interest may arise between us and El.En., and these conflicts might ultimately be resolved in a
manner unfavorable to us.
For financial reporting purposes, our financial results are included in El.En.s consolidated
financial statements. One of our directors, Andrea Cangioli, and the spouse of one of our directors, Leonardo Masotti, are also officers or directors of El.En. These two directors own or have an interest in substantial amounts of El.En. stock.
Ownership interests of our directors in El.En. stock, or service as a director of our company while at the same time serving as, or being the spouse of, a director or officer of El.En., could give rise to conflicts of interest when a director or
officer is faced with a decision that could have different implications for the two companies.
Conflicts may arise with respect to
possible future distribution and research and development arrangements with El.En. or another El.En. affiliated company in which the terms and conditions of the arrangements are subject to negotiation between us and El.En. or such other El.En.
affiliated company. These potential conflicts could also arise, for example, over matters such as:
|
|
|
the nature, timing, marketing, distribution and price of our products and El.En.s products that compete with each other;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property matters; and
|
|
|
|
business opportunities that may be attractive to both El.En. and us.
|
In order to address potential conflicts of interest between us and El.En., our restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions regulating and
defining the conduct of our affairs as they may involve El.En. and El.En. affiliated companies and El.En.s officers and directors who serve as our directors. These provisions recognize that we and El.En. and El.En. affiliated companies engage
and may continue to engage in the same or
33
similar business activities and lines of business and will continue to have contractual and business relations with each other. These provisions expressly
permit El.En. and its affiliated companies to compete against us and narrowly limit corporate opportunities that El.En. or its directors or officers who serve as our directors must make available to us.
Our class A share price may decline because of future sales of our shares by El.En.
El.En. may sell all or part of the shares of our class B common stock that it owns, at which time those shares would automatically convert into shares of
our class A common stock. El.En. is not subject to any contractual obligation to maintain its ownership position in our shares. Consequently, El.En. may not maintain its ownership of our common stock. Sales by El.En. of substantial amounts of our
common stock in the public market could adversely affect prevailing market prices for our class A common stock.
If El.En. sells the
shares of our stock held by it and no longer has control over us, our commercial relationship with El.En. may be adversely affected.
El.En. has advised us that it currently does not intend to sell its shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future. However, El.En.s plans and intentions may change at any time. El.En. is not subject to any contractual
obligation to maintain an ownership position in our shares.
If El.En. sells our shares and no longer has control over us, El.En. will
cease to include our financial results in its consolidated financial statements, and El.En.s interests may differ significantly from ours. If this occurs, our commercial relationship with El.En. may be adversely affected, which, in turn, could
have a material adverse effect on our business. For example, if El.En. does not have a continuing interest in our financial success, it may be more inclined to compete with us in North America and in other markets, not to enter into future
commercial agreements with us or to terminate or not renew our existing distribution agreements. If any of these events were to occur, it could harm our business.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
If we infringe or are alleged to infringe intellectual property rights of
third parties, our business could be adversely affected.
Our products may infringe or be claimed to infringe patents or patent
applications under which we do not hold licenses or other rights. Third parties may own or control these patents and patent applications in the United States and abroad. These third parties could bring claims against us that would cause us to incur
substantial expenses and, if successfully asserted against us, could cause us to pay substantial damages. Further, if a patent infringement suit were brought against us, we could be forced to stop or delay manufacturing or sales of the product that
is the subject of the suit.
As a result of patent infringement claims, or in order to avoid potential claims, we may choose or be required
to seek a license from the third party and be required to pay license fees or royalties or both. These licenses may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Even if we were able to obtain a license, the rights may be nonexclusive, which
could result in our competitors gaining access to the same intellectual property. Ultimately, we could be forced to cease some aspect of our business operations if, as a result of actual or threatened patent infringement claims, we are unable to
enter into licenses on acceptable terms. This could harm our business significantly.
There has been substantial litigation and other
proceedings regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in our industry. In addition to infringement claims against us, we may become a party to other types of patent litigation and other proceedings, including interference proceedings
declared by the United States Patent and Trademark Office and opposition proceedings in the European Patent Office, regarding intellectual property
34
rights with respect to our products and technology. The cost to us of any patent litigation or other proceeding, even if resolved in our favor, could be
substantial. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent
litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace. Patent litigation and other proceedings may also absorb significant management time.
If we are unable to obtain or maintain intellectual property rights relating to our technology and products, the commercial value of our technology
and products will be adversely affected and our competitive position could be harmed.
Our success and ability to compete depends in
part upon our ability to obtain protection in the United States and other countries for our products by establishing and maintaining intellectual property rights relating to or incorporated into our technology and products. We own a variety of
patents and patent applications in the United States and corresponding patents and patent applications in many foreign jurisdictions. To date, however, our patent estate has not stopped other companies from competing against us, and we do not know
how successful we would be should we choose to assert our patents against suspected infringers. Our pending and future patent applications may not issue as patents or, if issued, may not issue in a form that will be advantageous to us. Even if
issued, patents may be challenged, narrowed, invalidated or circumvented, which could limit our ability to stop competitors from marketing similar products or limit the length of term of patent protection we may have for our products. Changes in
either patent laws or in interpretations of patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our intellectual property or narrow the scope of our patent protection.
If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary information and know-how, the value of our technology and products could be
adversely affected.
In addition to patented technology, we rely upon unpatented proprietary technology, processes and know-how,
particularly with respect to our Alexandrite and pulse dye lasers. We generally seek to protect this information in part by confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and third parties. These agreements may be breached, and we may
not have adequate remedies for any such breach. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors.
Risks Related to Government Regulation
If we fail to obtain and maintain necessary U.S. Food and Drug Administration
clearances for our products and indications or if clearances for future products and indications are delayed or not issued, our business would be harmed.
Our products are classified as medical devices and are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and other federal, state and local authorities. These regulations relate to manufacturing, labeling, sale, promotion,
distribution, importing and exporting and shipping of our products. In the United States, before we can market a new medical device, or a new use of, or claim for, an existing product, we must first receive either 510(k) clearance or premarket
approval from the FDA, unless an exemption applies. Both of these processes can be expensive and lengthy and entail significant user fees, unless exempt. The FDAs 510(k) clearance process usually takes from three to 12 months, but it can last
longer. The process of obtaining premarket approval is much more costly and uncertain than the 510(k) clearance process. It generally takes from one to three years, or even longer, from the time the premarket approval application is submitted to the
FDA until an approval is obtained.
In order to obtain premarket approval and, in some cases, a 510(k) clearance, a product sponsor must
conduct well controlled clinical trials designed to test the safety and effectiveness of the product. Conducting clinical trials generally entails a long, expensive and uncertain process that is subject to delays and failure at any
35
stage. The data obtained from clinical trials may be inadequate to support approval or clearance of a submission. In addition, the occurrence of unexpected
findings in connection with clinical trials may prevent or delay obtaining approval or clearance. If we conduct clinical trials, they may be delayed or halted, or be inadequate to support approval or clearance, for numerous reasons, including:
|
|
|
FDA, other regulatory authorities or an institutional review board may place a clinical trial on hold;
|
|
|
|
patients may not enroll in clinical trials, or patient follow-up may not occur, at the rate we expect;
|
|
|
|
patients may not comply with trial protocols;
|
|
|
|
institutional review boards and third party clinical investigators may delay or reject our trial protocol;
|
|
|
|
third party clinical investigators may decline to participate in a trial or may not perform a trial on our anticipated schedule or consistent with the clinical
trial protocol, good clinical practices, or other FDA requirements;
|
|
|
|
third party organizations may not perform data collection and analysis in a timely or accurate manner;
|
|
|
|
regulatory inspections of our clinical trials or manufacturing facilities may, among other things, require us to undertake corrective action or suspend or terminate
our clinical trials, or invalidate our clinical trials;
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions; and
|
|
|
|
the interim or final results of the clinical trials may be inconclusive or unfavorable as to safety or effectiveness.
|
Medical devices may be marketed only for the indications for which they are approved or cleared. The FDA may not approve or clear indications that are
necessary or desirable for successful commercialization. Indeed, the FDA may refuse our requests for 510(k) clearance or premarket approval of new products, new intended uses or modifications to existing products. Our clearances can be revoked if
safety or effectiveness problems develop.
After clearance or approval of our products, we are subject to continuing regulation by
the FDA, and if we fail to comply with FDA regulations, our business could suffer.
Even after clearance or approval of a product,
we are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including the requirements that our facility be registered and our devices listed with the agency. We are subject to Medical Device Reporting regulations, which require us to report to the FDA if
our products may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunction in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. We must report corrections and removals to the FDA
where the correction or removal was initiated to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act caused by the device that may present a risk to health, and maintain records of other
corrections or removals. The FDA closely regulates promotion and advertising and our promotional and advertising activities could come under scrutiny. Since 1994, we have received five untitled letters from the FDA regarding alleged violations
caused by our promotional activities. We have responded to these letters and the FDA has found our responses acceptable. If the FDA objects to our promotional and advertising activities or finds that we failed to submit reports under the Medical
Device Reporting regulations, for example, the FDA may allege our activities resulted in violations.
The FDA and state authorities have
broad enforcement powers. Our failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements could result in enforcement action by the FDA or state agencies, which may include any of the following sanctions:
|
|
|
untitled letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;
|
|
|
|
repair, replacement, refunds, recall or seizure of our products;
|
36
|
|
|
operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;
|
|
|
|
refusing or delaying our requests for 510(k) clearance or premarket approval of new products or new intended uses;
|
|
|
|
withdrawing 510(k) clearance or premarket approvals that have already been granted; and
|
If any of
these events were to occur, they could harm our business.
Federal regulatory reforms may adversely affect our ability to sell our
products profitably.
From time to time, legislation is drafted and introduced in Congress that could significantly change the
statutory provisions governing the clearance or approval, manufacture and marketing of a device. In addition, FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the agency in ways that may significantly affect our business and our
products. It is impossible to predict whether legislative changes will be enacted or FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations changed, and what the impact of such changes, if any, may be.
We have modified some of our products without FDA clearance. The FDA could retroactively determine that the modifications were improper and require
us to stop marketing and recall the modified products.
Any modifications to one of our FDA-cleared devices that could significantly
affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change in its intended use, requires a new 510(k) clearance or a premarket approval. We may be required to submit extensive pre-clinical and clinical data depending on the nature
of the changes. We may not be able to obtain additional 510(k) clearances or premarket approvals for modifications to, or additional indications for, our existing products in a timely fashion, or at all. Delays in obtaining future clearances or
approvals would adversely affect our ability to introduce new or enhanced products in a timely manner, which in turn would harm our revenue and operating results. We have made modifications to our devices in the past and may make additional
modifications in the future that we believe do not or will not require additional clearances or approvals. If the FDA disagrees, and requires new clearances or approvals for the modifications, we may be required to recall and to stop marketing the
modified devices, which could harm our operating results and require us to redesign our products.
If we fail to comply with the
FDAs Quality System Regulation and laser performance standards, our manufacturing operations could be halted, and our business would suffer.
We are currently required to demonstrate and maintain compliance with the FDAs QSR. The QSR is a complex regulatory scheme that covers the methods and documentation of the design, testing, control,
manufacturing, labeling, quality assurance, packaging, storage and shipping of our products. Because our products involve the use of lasers, our products also are covered by a performance standard for lasers set forth in FDA regulations. The laser
performance standard imposes specific record keeping, reporting, product testing and product labeling requirements. These requirements include affixing warning labels to laser products as well as incorporating certain safety features in the design
of laser products. The FDA enforces the QSR and laser performance standards through periodic unannounced inspections. We have been, and anticipate in the future being, subject to such inspections. Our failure to comply with the QSR or to take
satisfactory corrective action in response to an adverse QSR inspection or our failure to comply with applicable laser performance standards could result in enforcement actions, including a public warning letter, a shutdown of or restrictions on our
manufacturing operations, delays in approving or clearing a product, refusal to permit the import or export of our products, a recall or seizure of our products, fines, injunctions, civil or criminal penalties, or other sanctions, such as those
described in the preceding paragraphs, any of which could cause our business and operating results to suffer.
37
If we fail to comply with state laws and regulations, or if state laws or regulations change, our
business could suffer.
In addition to FDA regulations, most of our products are also subject to state regulations relating to their
sale and use. These regulations are complex and vary from state to state, which complicates monitoring compliance. In addition, these regulations are in many instances in flux. For example, federal regulations allow our prescription products to be
sold to or on the order of licensed practitioners, that is, practitioners licensed by law to use or order the use of a prescription device. Licensed practitioners are defined on a state-by-state basis. As a result, some states permit
non-physicians to purchase and operate our products, while other states do not. Additionally, a state could change its regulations at any time to prohibit sales to particular types of customers. We believe that, to date, we have sold our
prescription products only to licensed practitioners. However, our failure to comply with state laws or regulations and changes in state laws or regulations may adversely affect our business.
We or our distributors may be unable to obtain or maintain international regulatory qualifications or approvals for our current or future products
and indications, which could harm our business.
Sales of our products outside the United States are subject to foreign regulatory
requirements that vary widely from country to country. In many countries, our third party distributors are responsible for obtaining and maintaining regulatory approvals for our products. We do not control our third party distributors, and they may
not be successful in obtaining or maintaining these regulatory approvals. In addition, the FDA regulates exports of medical devices from the United States.
Complying with international regulatory requirements can be an expensive and time consuming process, and approval is not certain. The time required to obtain foreign clearances or approvals may be longer than that
required for FDA clearance or approval, and requirements for such clearances or approvals may differ significantly from FDA requirements. Foreign regulatory authorities may not clear or approve our products for the same indications cleared or
approved by the FDA. The foreign regulatory approval process may include all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA clearance or approval in addition to other risks. Although we or our distributors have obtained regulatory approvals in the
European Union and other countries outside the United States for many of our products, we or our distributors may be unable to maintain regulatory qualifications, clearances or approvals in these countries or obtain qualifications, clearances or
approvals in other countries. For example, we are in the process of seeking regulatory approvals from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for the direct sale of our products into that country. If we are not successful in doing so,
our business will be harmed. We may also incur significant costs in attempting to obtain and in maintaining foreign regulatory clearances, approvals or qualifications.
Foreign regulatory agencies, as well as the FDA, periodically inspect manufacturing facilities both in the United States and abroad. If we experience delays in receiving necessary qualifications, clearances or
approvals to market our products outside the United States, or if we fail to receive those qualifications, clearances or approvals, or if we fail to comply with other foreign regulatory requirements, we and our distributors may be unable to market
our products or enhancements in international markets effectively, or at all. Additionally, the imposition of new requirements may significantly affect our business and our products. We may not be able to adjust to such new requirements.
New regulations may limit our ability to sell to non-physicians, which could harm our business.
Currently, we sell our products primarily to physicians and, outside the United States, to aestheticians. In addition, we recently began marketing our
products to the growing aesthetic spa market, where non-physicians under physician supervision perform aesthetic procedures at dedicated facilities. However, federal, state and international regulations could change at any time, disallowing sales of
our products to aestheticians, and limiting
38
the ability of aestheticians and non-physicians to operate our products. Any limitations on our ability to sell our products to non-physicians or on the
ability of aestheticians and non-physicians to operate our products could cause our business and operating results to suffer.
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
None.
We lease a 67,500
square foot facility in Westford, Massachusetts which houses our executive offices and our manufacturing, research and development and warehouse operations. The lease on this facility expires in December 2012. In addition, we lease an aggregate of
approximately 5,300 square feet of space at six other locations in Europe and the Asia/Pacific region that we use for sales and service purposes.
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
In May
2005, Dr. Ari Weitzner, individually and as putative representative of a purported class, filed a complaint against us under the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) in Massachusetts Superior Court in Middlesex County seeking
monetary damages, injunctive relief, costs and attorneys fees. The complaint alleges that we violated the TCPA by sending unsolicited advertisements by facsimile to the plaintiff and other recipients without the prior express invitation or
permission of the recipients. Under the TCPA, recipients of unsolicited facsimile advertisements are entitled to damages of up to $500 per facsimile for inadvertent violations and up to $1,500 per facsimile for knowing or willful violations. Based
on discovery in this matter, the plaintiff alleges that approximately three million facsimiles were sent on our behalf by a third party to approximately 100,000 individuals. On February 6, 2008, several months after the close of discovery, the
plaintiff served a motion for class certification, which we opposed. The court held a hearing on the plaintiffs class certification motion on June 17, 2008. We are not currently able to estimate the amount or range of loss that could
result from an unfavorable outcome of this lawsuit.
On July 16, 2008, we commenced a declaratory judgment action in the United States
District Court for the District of Massachusetts requesting a declaration that Dr. Weitzners and the putative class claims are covered under our general liability insurance policies. On August 11, 2008, our insurance company filed an
Answer and Counterclaim against us seeking a declaration that our policy does not provide coverage for Dr. Weitzners claims. On August 19, 2008, we filed a reply to the Counterclaim. The insurance company filed a Motion for Summary
Judgment on December 15, 2008, and we cross moved for Summary Judgment on January 15, 2009. The court held a hearing on the motions on February 26, 2009, and took the matter under advisement. We are not able to estimate the amount or
range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome of the lawsuit as the matter is still in the early stages of the proceedings.
On January 9, 2008, we commenced a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts against CoolTouch Inc., or CoolTouch, for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,206,873, or the 873 patent. Our complaint alleges
that CoolTouchs CoolLipo infringes on the 873 patent and seeks damages and injunctive relief. On January 31, 2008, CoolTouch answered our complaint, denying liability and alleging that the 873 patent is not infringed and is
invalid, and also asserted counterclaims against us in the same court alleging patent infringement by us. CoolTouchs counterclaim alleged that our Affirm product infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,122,029 and 6,451,007, and that our Smartlipo
product infringes U.S. Patent No. 7,217,265, and seeks damages in an unspecified amount, as well as injunctive relief. On February 18, 2009, CoolTouch dismissed its counterclaims with prejudice alleging that we infringe U.S. Patent Nos.
7,217,265 and 6,451,007. We are vigorously prosecuting our claims against CoolTouch and defending against CoolTouchs counterclaims. We are not able to estimate the amount or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome of the
lawsuit as the matter is still in the early stages of the proceedings.
39
In addition to the matters discussed above, from time to time, we are subject to various claims,
lawsuits, disputes with third parties, investigations and pending actions involving various allegations against us incident to the operation of its business, principally product liability. Each of these other matters is subject to various
uncertainties, and it is possible that some of these other matters may be resolved unfavorably to us. We establish accruals for losses that management deems to be probable and subject to reasonable estimate. We believe that the ultimate outcome of
these matters will not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 4.
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
None.
40
PART II
Item 5.
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuers Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market Price of and Dividends on Our Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters.
Our class A common stock trades on The Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol CYNO The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of our class A common stock on The
Nasdaq Global Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
30.57
|
|
$
|
15.85
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
39.18
|
|
$
|
26.11
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
39.10
|
|
$
|
26.14
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
45.00
|
|
$
|
25.20
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
28.24
|
|
$
|
17.58
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
26.24
|
|
$
|
19.66
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
25.23
|
|
$
|
17.38
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
18.15
|
|
$
|
6.64
|
There is no established public trading market for our class B common stock because, under the
terms of our restated certificate of incorporation, shares of our class B common stock will convert automatically into class A common stock upon any transfer of such shares, whether or not for value. Additionally, shares of our class B common stock
are also convertible into class A common stock upon the occurrence of events specified in our restated certificate of incorporation. Each share of our class B common stock is convertible into one share of class A common stock.
On March 9, 2009, the closing price per share of our class A common stock was $4.62, as reported on The Nasdaq Global Market. The number of record
holders of our class A common stock as of March 9, 2009 was 11. The number of record holders of our class B common stock as of March 9, 2009 was three.
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. Payment of future dividends, if any, will
be at the discretion of our board of directors.
Our total cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, long-term investments and related
financial instruments balance was $95.5 million.
We did not sell any unregistered securities during the period covered by this Annual
Report filed on Form 10-K.
41
The following graph compares cumulative total shareholder return on our class A common stock from
December 9, 2005, the date our class A common stock commenced trading on the Nasdaq National Market, through December 31, 2008 with the cumulative total return for the Nasdaq U.S. Index and the Nasdaq Medical Devices Index. This graph
assumes investment of $100 on December 9, 2005 in our class A common stock, the Nasdaq U.S. Index and the Nasdaq Medical Devices Index and assumes all dividends are reinvested. We have never paid dividends on our class A common stock and have
no present plans to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
12/09/2005
|
|
12/31/2005
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
12/31/2007
|
|
12/31/2008
|
NASDAQ Medical Dev/Ins/Sup
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
$
|
96.78
|
|
$
|
102.07
|
|
$
|
128.84
|
|
$
|
69.39
|
NASDAQ U.S. Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
97.91
|
|
|
109.52
|
|
|
103.70
|
|
|
65.17
|
Cynosure, Inc.
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
110.20
|
|
|
75.89
|
|
|
167.15
|
|
|
34.50
|
42
Item 6.
|
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
|
You should read the following selected consolidated financial data in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report and the Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this Annual Report. We have derived the consolidated statement of operat ions data for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and the consolidated balance
sheet data as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 from our audited consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report. We have derived the consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 from our audited consolidated financial statements, which are not included in this Annual Report. Our historical results for any
prior period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
139,662
|
|
|
$
|
124,315
|
|
|
$
|
78,401
|
|
|
$
|
56,262
|
|
|
$
|
40,364
|
|
Revenues from related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
139,662
|
|
|
|
124,315
|
|
|
|
78,401
|
|
|
|
56,262
|
|
|
|
41,633
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
48,705
|
|
|
|
44,507
|
|
|
|
32,920
|
|
|
|
25,843
|
|
|
|
20,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
90,957
|
|
|
|
79,808
|
|
|
|
45,481
|
|
|
|
30,419
|
|
|
|
21,168
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
53,062
|
|
|
|
42,058
|
|
|
|
26,213
|
|
|
|
17,506
|
|
|
|
12,627
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
7,497
|
|
|
|
6,827
|
|
|
|
4,673
|
|
|
|
3,199
|
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
17,837
|
|
|
|
11,346
|
|
|
|
8,975
|
|
|
|
5,103
|
|
|
|
4,108
|
|
Royalty settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
78,396
|
|
|
|
60,231
|
|
|
|
49,861
|
|
|
|
25,808
|
|
|
|
19,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
12,561
|
|
|
|
19,577
|
|
|
|
(4,380
|
)
|
|
|
4,611
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
(Loss) gain on investments
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,019
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
14,970
|
|
|
|
22,788
|
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
|
|
4,332
|
|
|
|
5,084
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
4,771
|
|
|
|
8,276
|
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
10,199
|
|
|
$
|
14,512
|
|
|
$
|
(650
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,160
|
|
|
$
|
5,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
12,581
|
|
|
|
11,993
|
|
|
|
11,084
|
|
|
|
6,522
|
|
|
|
5,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
12,806
|
|
|
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
11,084
|
|
|
|
7,715
|
|
|
|
5,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, long-term investments and related financial instruments
|
|
$
|
95,451
|
|
|
$
|
86,097
|
|
|
$
|
57,246
|
|
|
$
|
64,646
|
|
|
$
|
4,028
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
109,495
|
|
|
|
113,732
|
|
|
|
80,460
|
|
|
|
79,227
|
|
|
|
10,678
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
173,122
|
|
|
|
149,844
|
|
|
|
109,566
|
|
|
|
100,168
|
|
|
|
28,001
|
|
Capital lease obligation, net of current portion
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
30,531
|
|
|
|
20,332
|
|
|
|
5,820
|
|
|
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
2,310
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
140,354
|
|
|
|
120,878
|
|
|
|
85,870
|
|
|
|
83,151
|
|
|
|
14,640
|
|
43
Item 7.
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
Company Overview
You should read the following
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and the related notes and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Some of the information contained in this
discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should review
Item 1A of this Annual Report for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and
analysis.
Company Overview
We
develop and market aesthetic treatment systems used by physicians and other practitioners that incorporate laser and light-based energy sources. As of December 31, 2008, we had sold more than 8,900 aesthetic treatment systems worldwide.
We were incorporated in July 1991. In 2002, El.En. S.p.A., an Italian company that itself and through subsidiaries develops and markets
laser systems for medical and industrial applications, acquired a majority of our capital stock. In September 2003, we implemented and have since completed a comprehensive reorganization of our company, including:
|
|
|
redesigning many of our existing products;
|
|
|
|
introducing innovative new products and technologies;
|
|
|
|
streamlining and rationalizing our manufacturing processes;
|
|
|
|
reorganizing and expanding our research and development, sales and marketing and distribution capabilities; and
|
|
|
|
enhancing our customer service network.
|
Since the beginning of 2004, we have introduced 15 new aesthetic treatment systems, including our eight flagship products:
|
|
|
the
Apogee Elite
system, our flagship product for hair removal, in March 2004;
|
|
|
|
the
Cynergy
system, our flagship product for the treatment of vascular lesions, in February 2005;
|
|
|
|
the
TriActive LaserDermology
system, our flagship product for the temporary reduction of the appearance of cellulite, in February 2004;
|
|
|
|
the
Affirm
system, our flagship product for anti-aging, in April 2006;
|
|
|
|
the
Smartlipo
system
,
our flagship product for LaserBodySculpting
SM
for the removal of unwanted fat, in November 2006;
|
|
|
|
the
Accolade
system
,
our flagship product for the removal of pigmented lesion, in February 2008;
|
|
|
|
the
Smartlipo MPX
system, our flagship product for LaserBodySculpting
SM
for the next generation of laser lipolysis, in April 2008; and
|
|
|
|
the
Affirm CO2
system, our flagship product to treat deep wrinkles and significant photo damage, in July 2008.
|
As a result of our product development efforts, we incurred increased research and development expenses in absolute dollars, although not as a percentage
of revenues, during each of 2008 and 2007.
44
We have expanded our direct sales and marketing organization from 22 employees as of December 31,
2003 to 132 employees as of December 31, 2008. In addition, we have expanded our distribution relationships and have 25 distributors covering 55 countries as of December 31, 2008.
We redesigned or introduced a number of our products, including our
Apogee, Cynergy, Acclaim
and
Affirm
product families, so that they are
built in a modular fashion using fewer components. We began shipping these redesigned products in the second quarter of 2005. We believe that this approach allows our platform technology to be easily upgradeable, increases the scalability and
efficiency of our production process and facilitates improvements in field service diagnosis and repair.
In 2007, we released two new
Smartlipo
workstations, the 10-watt and the 18-watt
Smartlipo
workstations, that are intended for high-volume aesthetic laser practices, allowing a physician to reduce patient treatment times for laser-assisted liposuction procedures.
The 10-watt and 18-watt
Smartlipo
workstations are available as a standalone unit or as an upgrade to existing systems.
In January
2008, we introduced the
Accolade
, our sixth flagship product, which is a high powered 755nm, Q-switched Alexandrite laser for the removal of benign pigmented lesions, including pigmented lesions known as Nevus of Ota and Nevus of Ito, as well
as multi-colored tattoos.
In April 2008, we introduced the
Smartlipo MPX
workstation, the next generation of our workstations for
laser lipolysis.
Smartlipo MPX
is the only FDA-cleared,dual-wavelength laser system designed to efficiently liquefy fat and tighten skin through tissue coagulation.
In July 2008, we introduced the
Affirm CO2
workstation, which, in contrast to the original
Affirm
workstation, uses an ablative approach,
which involves the removal of upper layers of skin, to target the epidermal and dermal layer with the objective of treating dyschromia, deep wrinkles and significant photoaging.
Financial Operations Overview
From 2004 through 2007, we experienced significant growth in
operations and the number of our employees. Revenue increased from $27.1 million in 2003 to $124.3 million in 2007, and $139.7 million in 2008. However, during 2008, revenue growth began to slow during the first three quarters, and
revenues in the fourth quarter of 2008 decreased as compared to revenues in the fourth quarter 2007. We began 2003 with 138 employees and had 288 as of December 31, 2008. During the fourth quarter of 2008, due to the decrease in
revenues, we reduced our worldwide headcount by 17%, decreased spending on various programs and implemented general cost-control initiatives intended to reduce our 2009 operating expenses, although we were not required to incur any restructuring
charges.
Revenues
We generate revenues primarily from sales of our products and parts and accessories and, to a lesser extent, from services, including product warranty revenues. In 2008, we derived approximately 96% of our revenues from sales of our
products and 4% of our revenues from service. In 2007, we derived approximately 97% of our revenues from sales of our products and 3% of our revenues from service. In 2006, we derived approximately 95% of our revenues from sales of our products, 5%
of our revenues from service. Generally, we recognize revenues from the sales of our products upon delivery to our customers, revenues from service contracts and extended product warranties ratably over the coverage period, revenues from service in
the period in which the service occurs and revenues from our revenue sharing arrangement in the period the procedures are performed.
We
sell directly in North America, four European countries, Japan and China and use distributors to sell our products in other countries where we do not have a direct presence. In 2008, we derived 34%, in 2007, we derived 36% and in 2006, we derived
44% of our revenues from sales outside North America. As of December 31, 2008, we had 60 sales employees in North America, 34 sales employees in four European
45
countries, Japan and China and distributors that cover 55 countries. The following table provides revenue data by geographical region for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenues
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
56
|
%
|
Europe
|
|
20
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
26
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
11
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
13
|
|
Other
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for revenues
and asset data by geographic region.
Cost of Revenues
Our cost of revenues consists primarily of material, labor and manufacturing overhead expenses and includes the cost of components and subassemblies
supplied by third party suppliers. Cost of revenues also includes royalties incurred on products sold, service and warranty expenses, as well as salaries and personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation, for our operations
management team, purchasing and quality control.
Sales and Marketing Expenses
Our sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions and other personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation, for
employees engaged in sales, marketing and support of our products, trade show, promotional and public relations expenses and management and administration expenses in support of sales and marketing. We do not expect our sales and marketing expenses
to increase in absolute dollars, though we do expect them to increase as a percentage of revenues in 2009.
Research and Development
Expenses
Our research and development expenses consist of salaries and other personnel-related expenses, including stock-based
compensation, for employees primarily engaged in research, development and engineering activities and materials used and other overhead expenses incurred in connection with the design and development of our products. We expense all of our research
and development costs as incurred. We do not expect our research and development expenditures to increase in absolute dollars, though we do expect them to increase as a percentage of revenues in 2009.
General and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and other personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation, for executive, accounting and administrative personnel, professional fees and other general
corporate expenses. We do not expect our general and administrative expenses to increase in absolute dollars, though we do expect them to decrease as a percentage of revenues in 2009.
Interest Income (Expense), net
Interest income consists primarily of interest earned on our marketable securities and long-term investments portfolio consisting of state and municipal bonds, auction rate securities, corporate bonds, commercial paper, US government
sponsored enterprises and treasuries. Interest expense consists primarily of interest due on capitalized leases.
46
Provision for Income Taxes
As of December 31, 2008, we continued to maintain a valuation allowance only on the deferred tax assets related to our German operations. These
consist primarily of net operating loss carryforwards in the amount of $2.4 million, which do not expire and are available to reduce future taxable income in Germany. Valuation allowances are provided if, based on the weight of available evidence,
it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We continue to monitor the need for valuation allowances in each jurisdiction, and may adjust our positions in the future based on actual results.
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31,
2008 and 2007
The following table contains selected statement of operations data, which serves as the basis of the discussion of our
results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Change
2007 to 2008
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
As a % of
Revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
As a % of
Revenues
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
139,662
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
124,315
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
15,347
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
48,705
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
44,507
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
4,198
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
90,957
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
79,808
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
11,149
|
|
|
14
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
53,062
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
42,058
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
11,004
|
|
|
26
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
7,497
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6,827
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
10
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
17,837
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11,346
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6,491
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
78,396
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
60,231
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
18,165
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
12,561
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
19,577
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(7,016
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Loss on investments
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
73
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(909
|
)
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
14,970
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
22,788
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(7,818
|
)
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
4,771
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8,276
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(3,505
|
)
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
10,199
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
$
|
14,512
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
$
|
(4,313
|
)
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
Although our revenues in the fourth quarter of 2008 decreased as compared to the fourth quarter of 2007, revenues in the year ended December 31, 2008
exceeded revenues in 2007 by $15.3 million, or 12%. The increase in revenues was attributable to a number of factors (in thousands, except for percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Product sales in North America
|
|
$
|
85,188
|
|
$
|
73,728
|
|
$
|
11,460
|
|
16
|
%
|
Product sales outside North America
|
|
|
38,020
|
|
|
36,941
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
3
|
|
Original equipment manufacturer sales and revenue sharing
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
521
|
|
45
|
|
Parts, accessories and service sales
|
|
|
14,769
|
|
|
12,482
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
139,662
|
|
$
|
124,315
|
|
$
|
15,347
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Revenues from the sale of products in North America increased $11.5 million, or 16%, to $85.2 million in 2008, as compared to $73.7 million in 2007. The increase
was attributable to an increase in the number of product units sold and a higher average selling price due to a favorable change in product mix. The increase in North American revenues also resulted from the introduction of new products,
particularly our
Smartlipo MPX
system and
Affirm CO2
, which were introduced in the second and third quarter of 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from sales of products outside of North America increased $1.1 million, or 3%, to $38.0 million in 2008, as compared to $36.9 million in 2007. The increase
was mainly attributable to an increase in sales in Asia/Pacific of $3.2 million, or 82%, over 2007, resulting from our increased focus on direct selling, for which we receive higher average selling prices as compared to sales through distributors.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from original equipment manufacturer and other relationships and our revenue sharing arrangement increased $0.5 million, or 45%, to $1.7 million in 2008,
as compared to $1.2 million in 2007. This increase was mainly attributed to revenues from our European and Asia/Pacific subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from the sale of parts and accessories and services increased $2.3 million, or 18%, to $14.8 million in 2008, as compared to $12.5 million in 2007. The
increase was primarily attributable to an increase in revenues generated from service contracts year over year, which is related to the overall increase in volume of sales during the past three years. The increase was also attributable to an
increase in revenues generated from the sale of disposable components, related to our
Affirm
and
Smartlipo
systems that were introduced in late 2006, and the sale of other parts and accessories.
|
Cost of Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
48,705
|
|
|
$
|
44,507
|
|
|
$
|
4,198
|
|
9
|
%
|
Cost of revenues (as a percentage of total revenues)
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues increased $4.2 million, or 9%, to $48.7 million in 2008, as compared to $44.5
million in 2007. The increase in the cost of revenues was primarily attributable to an increase in direct labor, overhead and material costs associated with increased sales of our products and royalties incurred on the sale of hair-removal systems.
Our cost of revenues decreased as a percentage of revenues to 35% in 2008 from 36% in 2007, resulting in an increase in our gross margin of 1% from 2007 to 2008. The improved margin resulted primarily from higher average selling prices of our
products due to a favorable change in product and geographical mix, in part as a result of the introduction of our
Smartlipo MPX
and
Affirm CO2
systems during the second and third quarter of 2008, respectively, as well as higher
average selling prices on the
Affirm
and
Smartlipo
family of systems, year over year.
Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
53,062
|
|
|
$
|
42,058
|
|
|
$
|
11,004
|
|
26
|
%
|
Sales and marketing (as a percentage of total revenues)
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses increased $11.0 million, or 26%, to $53.1 million in 2008, as
compared to $42.1 million in 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $5.6 million in personnel costs, consulting costs and travel expenses associated with the expansion of our North American direct sales organization, which
was offset by a decrease of $0.2 million in commission expense. Personnel costs and travel
48
expenses associated with our international subsidiaries increased by $2.1 million, due to the expansion of our worldwide sales and marketing force,
particularly at the management level, which includes an increase of $0.3 million in commissions expense. Promotional costs increased $2.4 million, primarily due to our increased number of clinical workshops, trade shows and other promotional
efforts, as well as increased spending on international related marketing efforts. Sales and marketing expenses also increased due to an increase of $1.2 million in stock-based compensation expense and was partially offset by $0.4 million in other
administrative costs. Sales and marketing expenses increased as a percentage of revenue up to 38% of revenue for 2008 due primarily to lower than expected sales during the fourth quarter as a result of the current economic environment.
Research and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Research and development (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
7,497
|
|
|
$
|
6,827
|
|
|
$
|
670
|
|
10
|
%
|
Research and development (as a percentage of total revenues)
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses increased $0.7 million or 10%, to $7.5 million in 2008, as
compared to $6.8 million in 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $0.8 million in personnel costs and in increase in project research costs and product engineering expenses of $0.3 million related to the ongoing development
of new products and accessories. The increase is offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation expense of $0.4 million, which is due to the vesting of a variable stock option award to a non-employee that occurred in 2007 for which there is no
related stock-based compensation expense in 2008. As a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses remained relatively consistent, with no material difference as a percentage of revenue.
General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
General and administrative (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
17,837
|
|
|
$
|
11,346
|
|
|
$
|
6,491
|
|
57
|
%
|
General and administrative (as a percentage of total revenues)
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses increased $6.5 million, or 57%, to $17.8 million in 2008, as
compared to $11.3 million in 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in bad debt expense of $3.5 million, which related to both an increase in our allowance for doubtful accounts given the current economic environment, as well
as a $2.7 million write off of uncollectible accounts from certain customers, which were unable to meet their payment obligation to us during the fourth quarter. The increase also related to the increase of $0.9 million in administrative costs, an
increase in legal and professional services related costs of $1.4 million, and an increase of $0.7 million in stock-based compensation expense. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses increased to 13% in 2008 from 9% in
2007.
Interest Income, net; (Loss) Gain on Investment and Other (Expense) Income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
2,498
|
|
|
$
|
2,516
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
Loss on investment (in thousands)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
Other (expense) income, net (in thousands)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
(909
|
)
|
|
(105
|
)%
|
49
Interest income, net remained relatively consistent, year over year due to an overall increase in our
total investment portfolio of $3.3 million, or 4%, from $75.1 million as of December 31, 2007 to $78.4 million as of December 31, 2008, offset by decreases in interest rates. In 2008, we recognized an impairment loss on our investments in
auction rate securities of approximately $43,000. In 2007, we recognized a net loss of $0.2 million due to an impairment loss on the value of the securities received in 2006 in connection with the sale of our investment in Solx. The variance in
other (expense) income, net is a result of lower net foreign currency remeasurement gains (losses) during 2008 compared to the foreign currency remeasurement gains in 2007 due to the strengthening of the US dollar during 2008.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
4,771
|
|
|
$
|
8,276
|
|
|
$
|
(3,505
|
)
|
|
(42
|
)%
|
Provision as a percentage of income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes results from a combination of activities of both the domestic and
foreign subsidiaries. In 2008, we recorded an income tax provision of $4.8 million, representing an effective tax rate of 32%. In 2007, we recorded an income tax provision of $8.3 million, representing an effective tax rate of 36%. Our 2008
effective tax rate decreased from 2007, primarily due to an increased benefit from the 2008 and 2007 research and development tax credit, a relative increase in tax-exempt income, and a one-time intercompany bad debt deduction claimed in error that
was identified as a result of our 2003 IRS examination but was settled in December 2007. As the research and development tax credit statute will effectively expire on December 31, 2009, we are unable to predict whether this benefit will be available
to us in future tax periods.
Year Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
The following table contains selected statement of operations data, which serves as the basis of the discussion of our results of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Change
2006 to 2007
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
As a % of
Revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
As a % of
Revenues
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
124,315
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
78,401
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
45,914
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
44,507
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
32,920
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
11,587
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
79,808
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
45,481
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
34,327
|
|
|
75
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
42,058
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
26,213
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
15,845
|
|
|
60
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
6,827
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4,673
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2,154
|
|
|
46
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,346
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8,975
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2,371
|
|
|
26
|
|
Royalty settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
60,231
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
49,861
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
10,370
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
|
|
19,577
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(4,380
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
23,957
|
|
|
547
|
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
2
|
|
(Loss) gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
245
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before (benefit from) provision for income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
22,788
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
23,658
|
|
|
2,719
|
|
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
8,276
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,542
|
|
|
3,211
|
|
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
14,512
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
$
|
(650
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
$
|
15,162
|
|
|
2,333
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
Revenues
Revenues in the year ended December 31, 2007 exceeded revenues in 2006 by $45.9 million, or 59%. The increase in revenues was attributable to a number of factors (in thousands, except for percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Product sales in North America
|
|
$
|
73,728
|
|
$
|
39,784
|
|
$
|
33,944
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
Product sales outside North America
|
|
|
36,941
|
|
|
28,373
|
|
|
8,568
|
|
|
30
|
|
Original equipment manufacturer sales and revenue sharing
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Parts, accessories and service sales
|
|
|
12,482
|
|
|
9,061
|
|
|
3,421
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
124,315
|
|
$
|
78,401
|
|
$
|
45,914
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from the sale of products in North America increased $33.9 million, or 85%, to $73.7 million in 2007 as compared to $39.8 million in 2006. The increase was
attributable to an increase in the number of product units sold and a higher average selling price due to a favorable change in product mix. The increase in North American revenues resulted in part from the reorganization and expansion of our North
American sales organization, including the hiring of 20 additional direct sales employees between December 31, 2006 and 2007. The increase also resulted from the introduction of new products, particularly our
Affirm
and
Smartlipo
systems, which were introduced in late 2006.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from sales of products outside of North America increased $8.6 million, or 30%, to $36.9 million in 2007 as compared to $28.4 million in 2006. The increase
was mainly attributable to an increase in sales in Europe of $6.1 million, or 35%, over 2006, and an increase in sales in Asia/Pacific of $2.3 million, or 31%, over 2006, resulting from a favorable change in product mix and our increased focus on
direct selling, for which we receive higher average selling prices as compared to sales through distributors.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from original equipment manufacturer and other relationships and our revenue sharing arrangement remained relatively flat, year over year.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from the sale of parts and accessories and services increased $3.4 million, or 38%, to $12.5 million in 2007 as compared to $9.1 million in 2006. The
increase was primarily attributable to an increase in revenues generated from the sale of disposable components, related to our
Affirm
and
Smartlipo
systems that were introduced in late 2006, and parts. The increase also relates to an
increase in revenues generated from service contracts year over year, both of which are related to the overall increase in volume of sales during the past three years.
|
Cost of Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
44,507
|
|
|
$
|
32,920
|
|
|
$
|
11,587
|
|
35
|
%
|
Cost of revenues (as a percentage of total revenues)
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues increased $11.6 million, or 35%, to $44.5 million in 2007, as compared to $32.9
million in 2006. The increase in the cost of revenues was primarily attributable to an increase in direct labor, overhead and material costs associated with increased sales of our products and royalties incurred on the sale of hair-removal systems.
Included in cost of revenues for 2006 was a write off of $0.7 million related to inventory delivered under an agreement with Sona MedSpa, which was terminated in June 2006, for which there was no related expense in 2007. Our cost of revenues
decreased as a percentage of revenues to 36% in 2007 from 42% in 2006, resulting in an increase in our gross margin of 6% between the two years. The improved margin resulted primarily from higher average selling prices of our products due to a
favorable change in product mix, in part as
51
a result of the introduction of our
Affirm
and
Smartlipo
systems at the end of 2006 for which there was a full year of product sales in 2007
related to these new systems, a more favorable distribution mix toward direct sales and the write-off of inventory related to Sona MedSpa.
Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
42,058
|
|
|
$
|
26,213
|
|
|
$
|
15,845
|
|
60
|
%
|
Sales and marketing (as a percentage of total revenues)
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses increased $15.8 million, or 60%, to $42.1 million in 2007, as
compared to $26.2 million in 2006. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $8.4 million in personnel costs and travel expenses associated with the expansion of our North American direct sales organization, which includes an
increase of $4.1 million in commissions expense, an increase of $1.2 million in non-cash stock-based compensation expense, and an increase of $3.2 million in personnel costs and travel expenses associated with our international subsidiaries.
Promotional costs increased $3.0 million, primarily due to our increased number of clinical workshops and trade shows, as well as other promotional efforts. As a percentage of revenues, sales and marketing expenses remained relatively consistent,
with no material difference as a percentage of revenue.
Research and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Research and development (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
6,827
|
|
|
$
|
4,673
|
|
|
$
|
2,154
|
|
46
|
%
|
Research and development (as a percentage of total revenues)
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses increased $2.2 million or 46%, to $6.8 million in 2007, as
compared to $4.7 million in 2006. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $0.5 million in personnel costs and in increase in project research costs and product engineering expenses of $0.9 million related to the ongoing development
of new products and accessories. The increase is also attributable to an increase of $0.8 million in stock-based compensation expense. As a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses decreased to 5% in 2007 from 6% in 2006.
General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
General and administrative (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
11,346
|
|
|
$
|
8,975
|
|
|
$
|
2,371
|
|
26
|
%
|
General and administrative (as a percentage of total revenues)
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses increased $2.4 million, or 26%, to $11.3 million in 2007, as
compared to $9.0 million in 2006. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $1.3 million in personnel costs and an increase of $1.0 million in stock-based compensation expense. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative
expenses decreased to 9% in 2007 from 11% in 2006.
52
Royalty Settlement
On November 6, 2006, we entered into a patent cross-license agreement with Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. Under the cross-license agreement, we
obtained a non-exclusive license to integrate into our products certain hair removal technology covered by specified U.S. and foreign patents held by Palomar and Palomar obtained certain specified U.S. and foreign patents held by us. In November
2006, we made a payment to Palomar of $10 million for royalties related to sales prior to October 1, 2006 of hair removal-only systems including our Apogee family of products,
PhotoLight
,
Acclaim 7000
and the
PhotoSilk
Plus
. This was recorded as a royalty settlement within our operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006. In connection with this agreement, we also agreed to pay royalties to Palomar on our sales of certain hair-removal products
beginning October 1, 2006. The royalty rate for sales of hair-removal products ranges from 3.75% to 7.5% of net sales, depending upon product configuration and the number of energy sources. Royalty expense associated with such sales is recorded
as cost of revenues.
Interest Income, net; (Loss) Gain on Investment and Other Income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Interest income, net (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
2,516
|
|
|
$
|
2,579
|
|
$
|
(63
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
(Loss) gain on investment (in thousands)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
(245
|
)%
|
Other income, net (in thousands)
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Interest income (expense), net remained relatively consistent, year over year due to increases in
interest income from increased cash balances available for investment offset by decreases in investment yields as a result of transitioning our investment portfolio from investments in taxable securities to investments in tax-free securities. In
2007, we recognized a net loss of $0.2 million due to an impairment loss on the value of the securities received in 2006 in connection with the sale of our investment in Solx for which we recognized a gain of $0.1 million in 2006. Other income
increased to $0.9 million in 2007 from $0.8 million in 2006. The increase was partially attributable to the increase in foreign currency remeasurement gains, year over year.
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
8,276
|
|
|
$
|
(266
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,542
|
|
3211
|
%
|
Provision (benefit) as a percentage of income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
(31
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes results from a combination of activities of both the domestic and
foreign subsidiaries. In 2007, we recorded an income tax provision of $8.3 million, representing an effective tax rate of 36%. In 2006, we recorded an income tax benefit of $0.3 million, representing an effective tax rate of 31%. The increase in our
effective tax rate was due to a provision for income taxes of $0.7 million recorded in 2007 primarily related to a one-time intercompany bad debt deduction claimed in error that was identified as a result of our 2003 U.S. IRS examination, which was
settled in December 2007. We concluded the effect of this error was not material to our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and, as such, these financial statements were not restated. We also concluded that
providing for the correction of the error in 2007 would not have a material effect on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase in the effective tax rate related to the additional provision noted previously,
was partially offset by the reduction in foreign tax rates, the mixture of jurisdictional earnings, and the recognition of previously unbenefited deferred tax assets. In 2006, we recorded a benefit related to net operating losses generated in 2006,
which offsets the provision for current taxable income. Additionally, although we had an income tax provision of $8.3 million in 2007, we had no current U.S. federal income taxes payable due to the benefit from stock option exercises.
53
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We require cash to pay our operating expenses, make capital expenditures and pay our long-term liabilities. Since our inception, we have funded our operations through our 2005 initial public offering, private
placements of equity securities, short-term borrowings and funds generated from our operations.
At December 31, 2008, our cash, cash
equivalents, marketable securities, long-term investments and related financial instruments were $95.5 million, as compared to $86.1 million at December 31, 2007. Our cash and cash equivalents of $49.3 million are highly liquid investments with
maturity of 90 days or less at date of purchase and consist of time deposits and investments in money market funds with commercial banks and financial institutions. Our marketable securities of $25.1 million consist of investments in various state
and municipal governments, corporate bonds, commercial paper and US government sponsored enterprises, all of which mature by January 19, 2010. Our long-term investments and related financial instruments, which includes ARS with a fair market
value of $16.8 million and a related Right with a fair market value of $4.3 million, consist primarily of tax exempt certificates with an auction reset feature (auction rate securities), with underlying assets consisting generally of student loans,
which are substantially backed by the federal government.
In February 2008, auctions began to fail for auction rate securities and each
auction since then has failed. Based on the overall failure rate of these auctions, the frequency of the failures, and the underlying maturities of the securities, a portion of which are greater than 30 years, we have classified auction rate
securities as long-term assets on our consolidated balance sheet. During the year ended December 31, 2008, certain investments in ARSs were successfully called at full par value and we received cash proceeds of approximately $8.2 million. In
January 2009, an additional $1.7 million in cash proceeds was received by us related to certain investments in ARSs that were successfully called at full par value.
On November 3, 2008, we agreed to accept Auction Rate Security Rights, or Rights, from UBS Financial Services Inc. The Rights permit us to sell, or put, our auction rate securities back to UBS at par value at any
time during the period from June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012. We expect to exercise these Rights and put our auction rate securities back to UBS on June 30, 2010, the earliest date allowable under the Rights. These Rights are
nontransferable securities registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. As a result of accepting the Rights, we have released UBS and its employees/agents from all claims except claims for consequential damages directly or
indirectly relating to UBSs marketing and sale of ARS and agreed not to serve as a class representative or receive benefits under any class action settlement or investor fund. Simultaneously, we transferred our ARS investments, at their fair
value of $16.8 million, from available-for-sale to trading marketable securities. As a result of this transfer, the Company recognized an other-than-temporary loss of $4.3 million in (loss) gain on investments in our statement of operations. We
anticipate that any future changes in the fair value of the Rights will be offset by the changes in the fair value of the related ARS, both of which will be adjusted to their estimated fair value on an ongoing basis.
We measured the value of the Rights under the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
and recorded an offsetting gain
of $4.3 million in (loss) gain on investments, and a corresponding non-current asset.
Based on our expectations for future operating cash
flows and our other sources of cash, we do not anticipate the current lack of liquidity on these investments will affect our ability to execute our current business plan.
The recent disruptions in the financial and credit markets have also reduced access to cash by our customers and potential customers. If the capital spending of our customers or potential customers continues to
decrease, demand for our products would likely be adversely affected and our revenue will likely decline. Challenging economic and credit conditions also may impair the ability of our customers to pay for our products and services for which they
have contracted. While we continue to complete appropriate credit review of our customers prior to shipment of product and revenue recognition, we may be required to write off accounts receivable that become uncollectible.
54
Our future capital requirements depend on a number of factors, including the rate of market acceptance of
our current and future products, the resources we devote to developing and supporting our products and continued progress of our research and development of new products. Due to certain capital expenditures incurred during the year ended
December 31, 2008, including the expansion of our corporate headquarters facility and the implementation of a new financial software system, we expect that capital expenditures during the next 12 months will be less than our capital
expenditures during the 12 months ended December 31, 2008.
We believe that our current cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities, as well as cash generated from operations, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future.
Cash Flows
Net cash provided
by operating activities was $14.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. This resulted primarily from net income for the period of $10.2 million, approximately $11.4 million in depreciation and stock-based compensation expense, and
approximately $2.7 million in bad debt expense related to the write off of uncollectible accounts from certain customers affected by the overall economic environment during the fourth quarter of 2008, partially offset by approximately $2.8 million
in deferred income tax benefits. Net changes in working capital items reduced cash from operating activities by approximately $7.8 million, principally due to an increase in inventory for anticipated future sales and lower-than-expected sales for
the fourth quarter, as well as an increase in accounts receivable reflecting the record sales during 2008, an overall slowdown in collections as certain customers were affected by the overall economic environment and the tightening of the credit
markets and an increase in accounts payable and amounts due to a related party. These were partially offset by a decrease in accrued expenses. Net cash used in investing activities was $6.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, which
consisted primarily of $47.5 million used to purchase marketable securities and $5.9 million used for fixed asset purchases, offset by $48.1 million in proceeds generated from sales and maturities of securities. Net cash provided by financing
activities during the year ended December 31, 2008 was $2.9 million, principally relating to proceeds from option exercises of $1.6 million, tax benefits related to stock options of $1.8 million and partially offset by $0.5 million in payments
on capital lease obligations.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $21.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. This
resulted primarily from net income for the period of $14.5 million, increased by approximately $8.6 million in depreciation and stock-based compensation expense and decreased by approximately $1.8 million in deferred income tax benefits. Net changes
in working capital items decreased cash from operating activities by approximately $0.4 million principally related to an increase in inventory for anticipated future sales and an increase in accounts receivable reflecting the record sales during
the fourth quarter of 2007, offset by an increase in accrued expenses. Net cash used in investing activities was $8.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, which consisted primarily of $72.1 million used to purchase marketable
securities, offset by $68.2 million in proceeds generated from sales and maturities of securities, $4.2 million used for fixed asset purchases. Net cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2007 was $12.8 million,
principally relating to proceeds from option exercises of $6.1 million, tax benefits related to stock options of $7.4 million and offset by $0.4 million in payments on capital lease obligations.
Net cash used in operating activities was $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. This resulted primarily from net loss for the period of
$0.7 million, increased by approximately $4.9 million in depreciation and stock-based compensation expense and decreased by approximately $1.1 million in deferred income tax benefits and $0.6 million in accretion of discounts on marketable
securities. Net changes in working capital items decreased cash from operating activities by approximately $6.7 million principally related to the $10.0 million payment to Palomar during 2006, an increase in inventory for anticipated future sales
and an increase in accounts receivable reflecting the record sales during the fourth quarter of 2006. Net cash used in investing activities was $46.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, which consisted primarily of $188.9 million used
to purchase marketable securities, offset by $145.9 million in proceeds generated from sales and maturities of
55
securities, $3.2 million used for fixed asset purchases and $0.6 million used to purchase the remaining minority interest in Suzhou Cynosure Medical Devices,
Co. Net cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2006 was $0.5 million, principally relating to proceeds from option exercises of $0.5 million, tax benefits related to stock options of $0.4 million and offset by
$0.4 million in payments on capital lease obligations.
Contractual Obligations
Our major outstanding contractual obligations relate to our capital leases from equipment financings and our facilities leases. In addition, we guaranteed
the lease obligations for two facilities that are operated by Sona MedSpa and will be obligated to pay these leases if Sona MedSpa can not or does not make the required lease payments. We have summarized in the table below our fixed contractual cash
obligations as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Less Than
One Year
|
|
One to
Three Years
|
|
Three to
Five Years
|
|
More than
Five Years
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Capital lease obligations, including interest
|
|
$
|
951
|
|
$
|
470
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
$
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
4,627
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
2,176
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
Lease guarantees
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
5,682
|
|
$
|
1,690
|
|
$
|
2,681
|
|
$
|
1,311
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Since inception, we have not engaged in any off balance sheet financing activities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations set forth above are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates
and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those described below. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates and assumptions form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses,
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies require significant judgment and estimates by us in the preparation of our financial statements.
Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenue
In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 104,
Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,
we recognize revenue from sales of aesthetic treatment systems and accessories when each of the following four criteria are met:
|
|
|
there is persuasive evidence of an agreement;
|
|
|
|
the fee is fixed or determinable; and
|
|
|
|
collection is reasonably assured.
|
56
Revenue from the sale of service contracts is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the
contract period as services are provided. We are party to a revenue sharing arrangement with an operator and franchisor of spa franchises and recognize revenue from this arrangement in the period in which the procedures are performed.
We defer, until earned, payments that we receive in advance of product delivery or performance of services. When we enter into arrangements with multiple
elements, which may include sales of products together with service contracts and warranties, we allocate revenue among the elements based on each elements relative fair value in accordance with the principles of Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue Number 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.
This allocation requires us to make estimates of fair value for each element.
Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk
Our accounts receivable balance, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts, was $25.2 million as of December 31, 2008, compared with $24.1 million as of December 31, 2007. The allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2008 was $2.9 million and as of December 31,
2007 was $1.5 million. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon the aging of our receivable balances, known collectibility issues and our historical experience with losses. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we wrote off
uncollectible accounts totaling approximately $2.7 million as bad debt expense, related to certain customers inability to meet their payment obligations to us, primarily during the fourth quarter, which we believe was a result of the overall
economic environment. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2008, our credit losses were historically within our expectations and the allowances that we had established, however, we believe we may continue to experience credit losses, which could cause our
provisions for doubtful accounts to increase. We work to mitigate bad debt exposure through our credit evaluation policies, reasonably short payment terms and geographical dispersion of sales. Our revenues include export sales to foreign companies
located principally in Europe, the Asia/Pacific region and the Middle East. We obtain letters of credit for foreign sales that we consider to be at risk.
Inventories and Allowance for Excess and Obsolescence
We state all inventories at the lower
of cost or market value, determined on a first-in, first-out method. We monitor standard costs on a monthly basis and update them annually and as necessary to reflect changes in raw material costs and labor and overhead rates. Our inventory balance
was $30.2 million as of December 31, 2008 compared to $22.4 million as of December 31, 2007. Our inventory allowance as of December 31, 2008 was $1.5 million and as of December 31, 2007 was $1.6 million. We provide inventory
allowances when conditions indicate that the selling price could be less than cost due to physical deterioration, usage, obsolescence, reductions in estimated future demand and reductions in selling prices. We balance the need to maintain strategic
inventory levels with the risk of obsolescence due to changing technology and customer demand levels. Unfavorable changes in market conditions may result in a need for additional inventory reserves that could adversely impact our gross margins.
Conversely, favorable changes in demand could result in higher gross margins when we sell products.
Product Warranty Costs and
Provisions
We provide a one-year parts and labor warranty on end-user sales of our aesthetic treatment systems. Distributor sales
generally include a warranty on parts only. We estimate and provide for future costs for initial product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. We base product warranty costs on related material costs, technical support labor costs and
overhead. We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties by considering historical material, labor and overhead expenses and applying the experience rates to the outstanding warranty period for products sold. As we sell new products to our
customers, we must exercise considerable judgment in estimating the expected failure rates and warranty costs. If actual product failure rates, material usage, service delivery costs or overhead costs differ from our estimates, we would be required
to revise our estimated warranty liability.
57
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157). SFAS
No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under SFAS No. 157 as the exchange
price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under SFAS No. 157 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes the following fair value hierarchy based on three levels of
inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Level 2Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in
markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable markets data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Level 3Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
|
Our long-term investments and related financial instruments consist of tax exempt certificates with an auction reset
feature (auction rate securities or ARS) whose underlying assets are generally student loans, which are substantially backed by the federal government. In February 2008, auctions began to fail for these securities and each auction since then has
failed, with one exception. To date, we have collected all interest receivable on outstanding ARS when due and we expect to continue to do so in the future. During the year ended December 31, 2008, certain investments in ARS were successfully
called at full par value and we received cash proceeds of approximately $8.2 million. In January 2009, we received an additional $1.7 million in cash proceeds related to certain investments in ARSs that were successfully called at full par value.
While the auction failures will limit our ability to liquidate these investments, we believe that the ARS failures will not have an impact
on our ability to fund ongoing operations and growth initiatives. We continue to monitor efforts by the financial markets to find alternative means for restoring the liquidity of these investments.
As of December 31, 2008, we held $21.1 million, at par value, of auction rate securities investments. The auction rate securities are managed by UBS
Financial Services, Inc. (UBS). On November 3, 2008, we agreed to accept Auction Rate Security Rights (the Rights) from UBS offered through a prospectus filed on October 7, 2008. The Rights permit us to sell, or put, our ARS at par value
to UBS at any time during the period from June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012. We expect to exercise our ARS Rights and put our auction rate securities to UBS on June 30, 2010, the earliest date allowable under the
Rights.
As a result of accepting the Right, we transferred the ARS investments, at their fair value of $16.8 million, from
available-for-sale to trading marketable securities, in accordance with SFAS No. 115. As a result of this transfer, we recognized an other-than-temporary loss of $4.3 million in other income (expense) in the statement of operations, and we
anticipate that any future changes in the fair value of the ARS will be mostly offset by the changes in the fair value of the related Rights, both of which will be adjusted to their estimated fair value on an ongoing basis. As a result of the
illiquidity in the market for ARS investments, we have estimated the fair value of our ARS and the Rights using a Level 3 valuation methodology. We measured the value of the Rights under the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157, and
recorded a gain of $4.3 million in other income (expense), and a corresponding non-current asset within the consolidated balance sheet. Given the current failures in the auction markets to provide quoted market prices of the securities, as well
as the lack of any correlation of these instruments to other observable market data, we valued these securities using a discounted cash flow methodology with the most significant input categorized as Level 3. Significant inputs that went into the
model were the credit quality of the issuer, the percentage and types of guarantees (such as Federal Family
58
Education Loan Program FFELP), the probability of the auction succeeding or the security being called, the estimated period to liquidation, and an
illiquidity discount factor. Based on these inputs, discounts from par ranged from 17% to 44% with a weighted average discount across the portfolio of 21%.
Stock-Based Compensation
We follow the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement
No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment
, (SFAS No. 123(R)). SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to utilize an estimated forfeiture rate when calculating the expense for the period, whereas, SFAS No. 123 permitted companies to
record forfeitures based on actual forfeitures, which was our historical policy under SFAS No. 123.
During the year ended
December 31, 2008, we applied an estimated annual forfeiture rate of 5% in determining the expense recorded in the consolidated statements of income. Upon review of our actual rate of forfeitures since the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), and
in consideration of the reduction in force that took place during the fourth quarter of 2008, we changed our estimated forfeiture rate for certain option grants in 2008 from 5% to 14%. This change in estimate was recorded as a cumulative catch-up
adjustment of approximately $329,000 and as a reduction in stock-based compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2008.
The fair value of each stock option we granted is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. This option-pricing models require the input of various subjective assumptions, including the options expected life and the
price volatility of the underlying stock. Due to our initial public offering in December 2005, we believe there is not adequate information on the volatility of our own shares. As such, our estimated expected stock price volatility is based on a
weighted-average of our own historic volatility and the average volatility of other similar companies in the same industry. We believe this is more reflective and a better indicator of the expected future volatility, than using an average of a
comparable market index or of a comparable company in the same industry. Our expected term of options granted since adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) was derived from the short-cut method described in SECs Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 107. The risk-free rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that we have never paid cash dividends and have no present
intention to pay cash dividends.
We account for transactions in which services are received from non-employees in exchange for equity
instruments based on the fair value of such services received or of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured, in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R) and the Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18,
Accounting
for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services
, or EITF Issue No. 96-18.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting
for Income Taxes.
Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based upon the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for
the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. We reduce our deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that we will not realize some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets. We consider relevant evidence, positive and negative, to determine the need for a valuation allowance. Information evaluated includes our financial position and results of operations for the current and preceding
years, as well as an evaluation of currently available information about future years.
We account for uncertain tax positions under the
provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,
an Interpretation of FAS 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes,
(FIN 48), which we adopted effective January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for income taxes, by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest
and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
59
We generally report tax positions in our financial statements as they are reported on tax returns as
filed or expected to be filed. A tax benefit is reflected in the financial statements only if it is more-likely-than-not that we will be able to sustain the tax position, based on its technical merits. Tax benefits from uncertain tax
positions that reduce current or future income tax liabilities are reported in the financial statements only to the extent each benefit is recognized and measured, in accordance with the provisions of FIN 48.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(R),
Applying the Acquisition Method
(SFAS No. 141(R)), which replaces FASB Statement No. 141,
Business Combinations
. This Statement retains the fundamental
requirements in Statement 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This Statement
defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control. Statement 141 did not define the acquirer, although it
included guidance on identifying the acquirer, as does this Statement. This Statements scope is broader than that of Statement 141, which applied only to business combinations in which control was obtained by transferring consideration. By
applying the same method of accountingthe acquisition methodto all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses, this Statement improves the comparability of the information about
business combinations provided in financial reports. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities
. This Statement requires enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities to enable investors to better understand a companys use of derivative instruments and their effect on a companys financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. This Statement is effective for us beginning on January 1, 2009.
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
The following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We are exposed to market
risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity.
We maintain an investment portfolio consisting mainly of money market funds, state and municipal government obligations, some of which are auction rate securities, commercial paper, federal agency notes and corporate
obligations. The securities, other than money market funds and auction rate securities, are classified as available-for-sale and consequently are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). All investments other than auction rate securities mature by January 19, 2010. These available-for-sale securities are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market
interest rates increase, which could result in a realized loss if we are forced to sell an investment before its scheduled maturity. We currently have the ability and intent to hold our fixed income investments until maturity. We do not utilize
derivative financial instruments to manage our interest rate risks.
The following table provides information about our investment
portfolio in available-for-sale debt securities. For investment securities, the table presents principal cash flows (in thousands) and weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Investments (at fair value)
|
|
$
|
27,444
|
|
|
$
|
26,034
|
|
|
$
|
1,409
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Weighted average interest rate
|
|
|
4.05
|
%
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
|
|
6.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
60
We hold investments in auction-rate securities or (ARS) with underlying assets that generally consist of
student loans, which are substantially backed by the federal government. In February 2008, auctions began to fail for these securities and each auction since then has failed, with one exception. To date we have collected all interest receivable on
outstanding ARS when due and expects to continue to do so in the future. During the year ended December 31, 2008, certain investments in ARSs were successfully called at full par value and we received cash proceeds of approximately $8.2
million. In January 2009, an additional $1.7 million in cash proceeds was received by us related to certain investments in ARS that were successfully called at full par value.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we adjusted the carrying amount of our ARS to estimated fair market value. If uncertainties in the credit
and capital markets continue and these markets deteriorate further or we experience any additional rating downgrades on any investments in its portfolio, we may incur further temporary impairments or other-than-temporary impairments, which could
negatively affect our financial condition, cash flow and reported earnings.
As discussed further in Liquidity and Capital
Resources, in November 2008 we agreed to accept Auction Rate Security Rights, or (the Rights), from UBS Financial Services Inc., which permit us to sell, or put, our auction rate securities back to UBS at par value at any time during the
period from June 30, 2010 and July 2, 2012. Associated with the Rights, we classified $16.8 million of our ARS from available-for-sale securities to trading securities as of December 31, 2008 and recognized a loss of $4.3 million
in (loss) gain on investments, reflecting a reversal of the related temporary valuation allowance that was previously recorded within accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss) in shareholders equity. We elected to measure the value of the
Rights under the fair value option of FASB Statement No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115,
and recorded a gain of $4.3 million in
(loss) gain on investments, and a corresponding non-current asset. We expect that the future changes in the fair value of the ARS will be mostly offset by the fair value movements in the related Rights.
Foreign Currency Exchange.
A significant portion of our operations is conducted through operations in countries other than the United States.
Revenues from our international operations that were recorded in U.S. dollars represented approximately 44% of our total international revenues during the year ended December 31, 2008. Substantially all of the remainder of our revenues was from
sales in euros, British pounds, Japanese yen and Chinese yuan renminbi. Since we conduct our business in U.S. dollars, our main exposure, if any, results from changes in the exchange rate between these currencies and the U.S. dollar. Our functional
currency is the U.S. dollar. Our policy is to reduce exposure to exchange rate fluctuations by having most of our assets and liabilities, as well as most of our revenues and expenditures, in U.S. dollars, or U.S. dollar linked. Therefore, we believe
that the potential loss that would result from an increase or decrease in the exchange rate is immaterial to our business and net assets.
Item 8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
All financial statements and schedules required to be filed hereunder are included beginning on page F-1 and are incorporated in this report by reference
Item 9.
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
|
None.
Item 9A.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
Evaluation of
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2008. The term disclosure
61
controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and
forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated
and communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the
evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2008, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable
assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under
the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.
Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: 1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and 3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on
the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only
reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making its assessment, management used the criteria set forth in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway
Commission. A material weakness is a control deficiency (within the meaning of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 2), or combination of control deficiencies, that result in there being more than a remote
likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of their assigned functions. Based on managements assessment,
management determined that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 based on the COSO criteria.
Our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 has been audited by Ernst & Young, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report below.
62
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Cynosure, Inc.:
We have audited Cynosure Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Cynosure, Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in
all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control
based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors
of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Cynosure, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,
based on the COSO criteria
.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 of Cynosure, Inc. and our report dated March 12, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 12, 2009
63
Item 9B.
|
Other Information
|
None.
64
PART III
Item 10.
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this item with respect to our directors and executive officers will be contained in our 2009 Proxy Statement under the caption INFORMATION ABOUT OUR DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND 5%
STOCKHOLDERS and is incorporated in this report by reference.
The information required by this item with respect to
Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance will be contained in our 2009 Proxy Statement under the caption SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE and is incorporated in this report by reference.
The information required by this item with respect to corporate governance matters will be contained in our 2009 Proxy Statement under the
caption CORPORATE GOVERNANCE and is incorporated in this report by reference.
Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation
|
The
information required by this item will be contained in our 2009 Proxy Statement under the captions DIRECTOR COMPENSATION, COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS and EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION and is incorporated in this
report by reference.
Item 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information required by this item with regard to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management will be contained in our 2009 Proxy
Statement under the caption INFORMATION ABOUT OUR DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND 5% STOCKHOLDERSSecurity Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and is incorporated in this report by reference.
The information required by this item with regard to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be contained in our 2009
Proxy Statement under the caption EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONSecurities Authorized for Issuance under our Equity Compensation Plans and is incorporated in this report by reference.
Item 13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
|
The information required by this item will be contained in our 2009 Proxy Statement under the captions RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS and
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE and is incorporated in this report by reference
Item 14.
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this item will be contained in our 2009 Proxy Statement under the caption PROPOSAL 3RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM and is
incorporated in this report by reference.
65
PART IV
Item 15.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
1.
Financial Statements. The financial statements and notes thereto annexed to this report begin on page
F-1.
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Financial Statement Schedules. None
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Exhibits. The Exhibit Index annexed to this report, and immediately preceding the exhibits, is incorporated by reference.
|
66
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
CYNOSURE, INC.
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ M
ICHAEL
R.
D
AVIN
|
|
|
Michael R. Davin
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed by
the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
/
S
/ M
ICHAEL
R.
D
AVIN
Michael R. Davin
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
March 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
/s/ T
IMOTHY
W.
B
AKER
Timothy W. Baker
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
/s/ E
TTORE
V.
B
IAGIONI
Ettore V. Biagioni
|
|
Director
|
|
March 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
/s/ A
NDREA
C
ANGIOLI
Andrea Cangioli
|
|
Director
|
|
March 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
/s/ M
ARINA
H
ATSOPOULOS
Marina Hatsopoulos
|
|
Director
|
|
March 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
/s/ L
EONARDO
M
ASOTTI
Leonardo Masotti
|
|
Director
|
|
March 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
/s/ T
HOMAS
H.
R
OBINSON
Thomas H. Robinson
|
|
Director
|
|
March 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
/s/ G
EORGE
J.
V
OJTA
George J. Vojta
|
|
Director
|
|
March 13, 2009
|
67
CYNOSURE, INC.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cynosure, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cynosure, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Cynosure, Inc. at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Cynosure, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria
established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 12, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 12, 2009
F-2
CYNOSURE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
49,257
|
|
|
$
|
39,011
|
|
Marketable securities (Notes 4 and 5)
|
|
|
25,112
|
|
|
|
47,086
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $2,861 and $1,451 in 2008 and 2007, respectively
|
|
|
25,156
|
|
|
|
24,124
|
|
Amounts due from related parties (Note 11)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
30,248
|
|
|
|
22,442
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4,331
|
|
|
|
4,425
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
6,825
|
|
|
|
4,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
140,969
|
|
|
|
141,257
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
8,422
|
|
|
|
7,146
|
|
Long-term investments and related financial instruments (Notes 4 and 5)
|
|
|
21,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,649
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
173,122
|
|
|
$
|
149,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
5,095
|
|
|
$
|
2,810
|
|
Amounts due to related party (Note 11)
|
|
|
6,083
|
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
15,602
|
|
|
|
17,980
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
4,296
|
|
|
|
3,939
|
|
Capital lease obligation
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
31,474
|
|
|
|
27,525
|
|
Capital lease obligation, net of current portion
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
Other noncurrent liability
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value Authorized5,000 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 Issuedno shares as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A and Class B common stock, $0.001 par value Authorized70,000 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 Issued12,734
and 12,448 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
111,892
|
|
|
|
101,298
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
30,531
|
|
|
|
20,332
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(1,795
|
)
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
Treasury stock, 36 shares, at cost
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
140,354
|
|
|
|
120,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
173,122
|
|
|
$
|
149,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-3
CYNOSURE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
139,662
|
|
|
$
|
124,315
|
|
|
$
|
78,401
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
48,705
|
|
|
|
44,507
|
|
|
|
32,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
90,957
|
|
|
|
79,808
|
|
|
|
45,481
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
53,062
|
|
|
|
42,058
|
|
|
|
26,213
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
7,497
|
|
|
|
6,827
|
|
|
|
4,673
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
17,837
|
|
|
|
11,346
|
|
|
|
8,975
|
|
Royalty settlement (Note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
78,396
|
|
|
|
60,231
|
|
|
|
49,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
12,561
|
|
|
|
19,577
|
|
|
|
(4,380
|
)
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
(Loss) gain on investments (Notes 4 and 10)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
118
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
14,970
|
|
|
|
22,788
|
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
4,771
|
|
|
|
8,276
|
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
10,199
|
|
|
$
|
14,512
|
|
|
$
|
(650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
12,581
|
|
|
|
11,993
|
|
|
|
11,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
12,806
|
|
|
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
11,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4
CYNOSURE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
(LOSS)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A and B
Common Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
Deferred
Stock-
Based
Compensation
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss)
Income
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders
Equity
|
|
|
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
$0.001
Par
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
11,065
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
79,070
|
|
|
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
(1,426
|
)
|
|
|
(687
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
83,151
|
|
|
$
|
3,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation expense in excess of book deductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional IPO costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(650
|
)
|
|
$
|
(650
|
)
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
11,210
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
81,026
|
|
|
|
5,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(700
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
85,870
|
|
|
$
|
(663
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation expense in excess of book deductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
6,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,512
|
|
|
$
|
14,512
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
12,448
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
$
|
101,298
|
|
|
$
|
20,332
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(477
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(287
|
)
|
|
$
|
120,878
|
|
|
$
|
14,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation expense in excess of book deductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
286
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,199
|
|
|
$
|
10,199
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,376
|
)
|
|
|
(1,376
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
12,734
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
$
|
111,892
|
|
|
$
|
30,531
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,795
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(287
|
)
|
|
$
|
140,354
|
|
|
$
|
8,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
CYNOSURE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
10,199
|
|
|
$
|
14,512
|
|
|
$
|
(650
|
)
|
Reconciliation of net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,994
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
Loss (gain) on investments
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
7,422
|
|
|
|
5,777
|
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(2,819
|
)
|
|
|
(1,742
|
)
|
|
|
(1,079
|
)
|
Write off of accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Accretion of discounts on marketable securities
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(4,455
|
)
|
|
|
(3,496
|
)
|
|
|
(5,800
|
)
|
Due from related party
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(8,279
|
)
|
|
|
(4,184
|
)
|
|
|
(2,969
|
)
|
Net book value of demonstration inventory sold
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
1,574
|
|
|
|
(4,171
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
(3,261
|
)
|
|
|
2,451
|
|
Due to related party
|
|
|
3,826
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Tax benefit from stock option exercises
|
|
|
(1,774
|
)
|
|
|
(7,357
|
)
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
13,902
|
|
|
|
4,269
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
Other noncurrent liability
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
14,102
|
|
|
|
21,438
|
|
|
|
(4,103
|
)
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(5,937
|
)
|
|
|
(4,238
|
)
|
|
|
(3,190
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sales and maturities of securities
|
|
|
48,121
|
|
|
|
68,174
|
|
|
|
145,894
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(47,452
|
)
|
|
|
(72,140
|
)
|
|
|
(188,561
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(640
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(6,335
|
)
|
|
|
(8,192
|
)
|
|
|
(46,551
|
)
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on short-term loan and note payable to related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit on options exercised
|
|
|
1,774
|
|
|
|
7,357
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock and stock option exercises
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
|
|
6,062
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
Proceeds from initial public offering, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Payments on capital lease obligation
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
(440
|
)
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
12,811
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
10,246
|
|
|
|
25,321
|
|
|
|
(50,956
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
39,011
|
|
|
|
13,690
|
|
|
|
64,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
49,257
|
|
|
$
|
39,011
|
|
|
$
|
13,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes
|
|
$
|
8,432
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
$
|
2,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax refunds received
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,967
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental noncash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired under capital lease
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
204
|
|
|
$
|
775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes receivable related to stock options
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,077
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
CYNOSURE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Nature of the Business
Cynosure, Inc. (Cynosure or the Company) develops, manufactures and markets aesthetic treatment systems that are used by physicians and other
practitioners to perform non-invasive or minimally invasive procedures to remove hair, treat vascular lesions, rejuvenate skin through the treatment of shallow vascular lesions and pigmented lesions, as well as multi-colored tattoos, temporarily
reduce the appearance of cellulite, provide treatments for wrinkles, skin texture and skin discoloration and remove unwanted fat. Cynosure markets and sells its products primarily to the dermatology, plastic surgery and general medical markets, both
domestically and internationally. Cynosure is a Delaware corporation, incorporated on July 10, 1991, located in Westford, Massachusetts.
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Significant accounting policies followed in the preparation of these consolidated financial
statements are as follows:
Management Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosures at the date of the financial statements and during the reporting period. Components particularly subject to
estimation include the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, fair value of stock options and investments and accrued warranties. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cynosure, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Cynosure GmbH, Cynosure S.A.R.L., Cynosure UK Limited, Cynosure Spain, S.L.,Cynosure KK and
Suzhou Cynosure Medical Devices, Co. In September 2008, Cynosure established a wholly owned subsidiary, Cynosure Mexico, in Mexico. In December 2008, Cynosure established a wholly owned subsidiary, Cynosure Korea Limited, in Seoul, Korea (See Note
6). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Marketable Investments and
Long-term Investments and related financial instruments
Cynosure considers all short-term, highly liquid investments with original
maturities at the time of purchase of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. Cynosure accounts for investments in marketable securities and long-term investments as available-for-sale and trading securities in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS No.) No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
. Under SFAS No. 115, securities purchased to be held for indefinite periods of time and not intended at the time of purchase
to be held until maturity are classified as available-for-sale securities. Under SFAS No. 115, securities that are purchased and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are classified as
trading securities.
SFAS
No. 115 requires Cynosure to recognize all marketable securities on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. Cynosures marketable securities are stated at fair value based on quoted market prices. Adjustments to the fair
value of marketable securities that are classified as available-for-sale are recorded as increases or decreases, net of income taxes, within accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss) in shareholders equity and adjustments to the fair value
of marketable securities and long-term investments that are
F-7
classified as trading are recorded in earnings. The amortized cost of marketable debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and discounts
to maturity computed under the effective interest method. The cost of securities sold is determined by the specific identification method. Cynosure continually evaluates whether any marketable investments have been impaired and, if so, whether such
impairment is temporary or other than temporary.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Cynosures financial instruments consist of cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable, long-term investments and related
financial instruments and capital leases. Cynosures estimate of fair value for financial instruments, other than marketable securities, approximates their carrying value at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Cynosure adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
, for financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis
on January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 applies to all financial assets and financial liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair value basis, establishes a framework for measuring fair value of assets and liabilities and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. There was no impact to the consolidated financial statements as a result of the adoption of this Statement. The additional disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements are included in Note
4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk
Management works to mitigate its concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable through its credit evaluation policies, reasonably short
payment terms and geographical dispersion of sales. Revenue includes export sales to foreign companies located principally in Europe, the Asia/Pacific region and the Middle East. Cynosure obtains letters of credit for foreign sales considered by
management to be at risk. Cynosure maintains reserves for potential credit losses based upon the aging of its receivable balances, known collectibility issues and its historical experience with losses. In the event that it is determined that the
customer may not be able to meet its full obligation to Cynosure, Cynosure records a specific allowance to reduce the related receivable to the amount that Cynosure expects to recover given all information present. No customer accounted for 10% or
greater of revenue during 2006, 2007 or 2008. No customer accounted for 10% or greater of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2007 or 2008. Accounts receivable allowance activity consisted of the following for the years ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,451
|
|
|
$
|
1,009
|
|
|
$
|
696
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
2,289
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
(2,790
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(1,976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
2,861
|
|
|
$
|
1,451
|
|
|
$
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2008, Cynosure wrote off uncollectible accounts totaling
approximately $2.7 million as bad debt expense, related to certain customers inability to meet their payment obligations, primarily during the fourth quarter, which the company believes was a result of the overall economic environment.
In November 2006, Cynosure entered into a settlement agreement with Sona MedSpa pursuant to which each party released its claims
against each other in exchange for the payment by Sona MedSpa of $250,000 in cash to Cynosure. This settlement payment was initially recorded as an accrued expense in 2006 as it was subject to certain avoidance actions by a third-party and,
therefore, was subject to forfeiture. In 2007, the period during
F-8
which this settlement payment was subject to forfeiture lapsed; therefore, the settlement payment, which was in reimbursement for legal expenses, was
recorded as a reduction in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Inventory
Cynosure states all inventories at the lower of cost or market, determined on a
first-in, first-out method. Inventory includes material, labor and overhead and consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
3,680
|
|
$
|
1,467
|
Work in process
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
395
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
25,569
|
|
|
20,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,248
|
|
$
|
22,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in finished goods are lasers used for demonstration purposes. Cynosures policy is
to include demonstration lasers as inventory for a period of up to one year after production at which time the demonstration lasers are either sold or transferred to fixed assets at the lower of cost or market and depreciated over their estimated
useful life of three years. Similar to any other finished goods in inventory, Cynosure accounts for such demonstration inventory in accordance with the policy for excess and obsolescence review of Cynosures entire inventory.
Cynosures policy is to establish inventory reserves when conditions exist that suggest that inventory may be in excess of anticipated demand or is
obsolete based upon assumptions about future demand for products and market conditions. Cynosure regularly evaluates the ability to realize the value of inventory based on a combination of factors including the following: historical usage rates,
forecasted sales or usage, product end of life dates, estimated current and future market values and new product introductions. Assumptions used in determining managements estimates of future product demand may prove to be incorrect; in which
case the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory would have to be adjusted in the future. If inventory is determined to be overvalued, Cynosure recognizes such costs as cost of goods sold at the time of such determination. Although
Cynosure performs a detailed review of its forecasts of future product demand, any significant unanticipated changes in demand could have a significant impact on the value of Cynosures inventory and reported operating results. Inventory
reserve activity consisted of the following for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,568
|
|
|
$
|
995
|
|
|
$
|
1,019
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
1,527
|
|
|
$
|
1,568
|
|
|
$
|
995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cynosure purchases a significant raw material component from one vendor, who is the sole
manufacturer of this component. A delay in the production capabilities of this vendor could cause a delay in Cynosures manufacturing, and a possible loss of revenues, which would adversely affect operating results.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Assets under capital leases and leasehold improvements are
amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the
F-9
asset or the respective lease term. Included in property and equipment are certain lasers that are used for demonstration purposes, as well as lasers to
which Cynosure continues to hold title that are placed at customer locations under a revenue-sharing arrangement. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Cynosure continually evaluates whether events or circumstances have
occurred that indicate that the estimated remaining useful life of its long-lived assets may warrant revision or that the carrying value of these assets may be impaired. Cynosure evaluates the realizability of its long-lived assets based on
profitability and cash flow expectations for the related asset. Any write-downs are treated as permanent reductions in the carrying amount of the assets. Based on this evaluation, Cynosure believes that, as of each of the balance sheet dates
presented, none of Cynosures long-lived assets were impaired.
Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenue
Cynosure generates revenue from the sale of aesthetic treatment systems that are used by physicians and other practitioners to perform various
non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic procedures. These systems incorporate a broad range of laser and other light-based energy sources. Cynosure offers service and warranty contracts in connection with these sales.
Cynosure recognizes revenue in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104,
Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements
(SAB 104). Cynosure recognizes revenue from sales of its treatment systems and accessories upon delivery, provided there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the
fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility of the related receivable is reasonably assured. Revenues from the sales of service and warranty contracts are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period as services are
provided. Payments received by Cynosure in advance of product delivery or performance of services are deferred until earned. Multiple-element arrangements are evaluated in accordance with the principles of Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
Number 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables
(EITF 00-21), and Cynosure allocates revenue among the elements based upon each elements relative fair value.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, Cynosure entered into arrangements with two customers that included fees that were not considered to be
fixed or determinable. Therefore, revenue was recognized under these arrangements as payments became due. Cynosure recognized $3.0 million and $0.1 million of revenue during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, under these
arrangements which were completed during 2007. There was no revenue recognized under these arrangements during the year ended December 31, 2008.
In accordance with the provisions of EITF Issue Number 00-10,
Accounting for Shipping and Handling Costs
(EITF 00-10), Cynosure records shipping and handling costs billed to its customers as a component of
revenue, and the underlying expense as a component of cost of revenue. Shipping and handling costs included as a component of revenue totaled approximately $0.7 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively. Shipping and handling costs included as a component of cost of revenue totaled $0.8 million, $0.6 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Cynosure collects sales tax from its customers on product sales for which the customer is not tax exempt and remits such taxes to the appropriate
governmental authorities. Cynosure presents its sales taxes on a net basis; therefore, these taxes are excluded from revenues.
F-10
Product Warranty Costs
Cynosure typically provides a one-year parts and labor warranty on end-user sales of lasers. Distributor sales generally include a warranty on parts only.
Estimated future costs for initial product warranties are provided for at the time of revenue recognition. The following table sets forth activity in the accrued warranty account:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
3,094
|
|
|
$
|
2,803
|
|
|
$
|
2,265
|
|
Charged to expense
|
|
|
4,378
|
|
|
|
3,821
|
|
|
|
3,449
|
|
Costs incurred
|
|
|
(4,420
|
)
|
|
|
(3,530
|
)
|
|
|
(2,911
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
3,052
|
|
|
$
|
3,094
|
|
|
$
|
2,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and Development
Research and development costs consist of salaries and other personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation, of employees primarily
engaged in research, development and engineering activities and materials used and other overhead expenses incurred in connection with the design and development of Cynosures products. These costs are expensed as incurred.
Advertising Costs
Cynosure
expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs totaled $0.9 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Foreign Currency Translation
The financial statements of Cynosures foreign subsidiaries are translated from local currency into U.S. dollars using the current exchange rate at the balance sheet date for assets and liabilities, and the average exchange rate
prevailing during the period for revenue and expenses. The functional currency for Cynosures foreign subsidiaries is considered to be the local currency for each entity and, accordingly, translation adjustments for these subsidiaries are
included in accumulated other comprehensive income within stockholders equity. Certain intercompany and third party foreign currency-denominated transactions generated foreign currency remeasurement gains of approximately $17,000, $821,000 and
$812,000 during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which are included in other income (expense), net, in the consolidated statements of operations.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Comprehensive income (loss) is the
change in equity of a company during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances, excluding transactions resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of taxes
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
(1,879
|
)
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(1,795
|
)
|
|
$
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
The components of total other comprehensive (loss) income for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
(1,376
|
)
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain / (loss) on marketable securities
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Add-back: Reclassification adjustment for impairment of marketable security included in net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized gain on marketable securities
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(1,318
|
)
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation
Cynosure follows the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment
, (SFAS No. 123(R)). SFAS
No. 123(R) requires companies to utilize an estimated forfeiture rate when calculating the expense for the period, whereas, SFAS No. 123 permitted companies to record forfeitures based on actual forfeitures, which was Cynosures
historical policy under SFAS No. 123.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, Cynosure applied an estimated annual forfeiture
rate of 1% in determining the expense recorded in the consolidated statements of income. Upon review of its actual rate of forfeitures since the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and in consideration of managements expectations for future
forfeitures, Cynosure changed its estimated annual forfeiture rate in 2007 from 1% to 5%. This change in estimate was recorded as a cumulative catch-up adjustment of approximately $313,000 as a reduction in stock-based compensation expense during
the year ended December 31, 2007.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, Cynosure applied an estimated annual forfeiture rate
of 5% in determining the expense recorded in the consolidated statements of income. Upon review of its actual rate of forfeitures since the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and in consideration of the reduction in force that took place during the
fourth quarter of 2008, Cynosure changed its estimated forfeiture rate for certain option grants issued to the general workforce in 2008 from 5% to 14%. This change in estimate was recorded as a cumulative catch-up adjustment of approximately
$329,000 as a reduction in stock-based compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2008.
Cynosure recorded stock-based
compensation expense of $7.4 million, $5.8 million and $2.5 million and related tax benefits of $2.4 million, $1.8 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Additionally, as a result of
implementation of SFAS No. 123(R), as of January 1, 2006, Cynosure reversed approximately $1.4 million of remaining deferred stock-based compensation associated with the May 2005 option grants. Cynosure capitalized $50,000 and $65,000,
respectively, of stock-based compensation expense as a part of inventory as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.
F-12
Total stock-based compensation expense was recorded to cost of revenues and operating expenses based upon
the functional responsibilities of the individual holding the respective options, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
538
|
|
$
|
373
|
|
$
|
82
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
695
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
652
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
|
1,045
|
Other Expenses
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
7,422
|
|
$
|
5,777
|
|
$
|
2,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, there was $8.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related
to non-vested share awards that is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years. Cash received from option exercises was $1.6 million, $6.1 million and $484,000 during the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cynosure recognized $1.6 million, $8.4 million and $397,000 in tax benefits in excess of book deductions from these option exercises during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Cynosure granted 372,090, 588,050 and 522,150 stock options during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Cynosure uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the weighted average fair value of options, rather than a binomial model. The weighted-average fair value of the options granted during the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006 was $13.15, $18.84 and $11.52, respectively, using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
2.19% - 3.30%
|
|
3.35% - 4.77%
|
|
3.88% - 5.00%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term
|
|
5.8 years
|
|
5.8 years
|
|
5.8 years
|
Expected volatility
|
|
64% - 66%
|
|
70%
|
|
77% - 82%
|
Option-pricing models require the input of various subjective assumptions, including the
options expected life and the price volatility of the underlying stock. Due to Cynosures initial public offering in December 2005, Cynosure believes there is not adequate information on the volatility of its own shares. As such,
Cynosures estimated expected stock price volatility is based on a weighted-average of its own historic volatility and of the average volatilities of other similar companies in the same industry. Cynosure believes this is more reflective and a
better indicator of the expected future volatility, than using an average of a comparable market index or of a single comparable company in the same industry. Cynosures expected term of options granted during the twelve months ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was derived from the simplified method described in SECs Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107. The risk-free rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant. The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that Cynosure has never paid cash dividends and has no present intention to pay cash dividends.
Cynosure accounts for transactions in which services are received from non-employees in exchange for equity instruments based on the fair value of such
services received or of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured, in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R) and the Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18,
Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to
Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services
, or EITF Issue No. 96-18.
F-13
In July 2006, Cynosure entered into a consulting agreement with a former employee, who agreed to provide
services to the Company after his employment terminates for a period of one year from the effective date of the agreement. This consulting agreement can be terminated at any time by either party. In connection with this agreement, all vested
incentive stock options granted to this former employee were converted into an equivalent number of vested non-qualified stock options in order to avoid termination of such options and allow the former employee to exercise such options during the
term of the consulting agreement. This agreement also provided for an additional year of vesting of all of the unvested options previously granted to the former employee, while he was employed by the Company, throughout the term of the consulting
agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2007, Cynosure recorded approximately $0.7 million of additional stock-based compensation expense related to this agreement. This agreement expired in 2007 and no additional stock-based compensation
expense was recorded in the year ended December 31, 2008.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, Cynosure recorded
approximately $143,000 of stock compensation expense for an option grant to a former employee in connection with a legal settlement. This option grant was issued during the fourth quarter of 2008. Cynosure calculated the value of this option grant
using the Black-Scholes and using the following assumptions: (1) risk-free interest rate of 3.82%; (2) expected life of 10 years, which is the equivalent of the contractual life of the options; and (3) expected volatility of 63%. This
option grant became immediately exercisable upon issuance.
Income Taxes
Cynosure provides for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS No. 109). SFAS No. 109
recognizes tax assets and liabilities for the cumulative effect of all temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates that will be in
effect when these differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Cynosure accounts for uncertain tax positions following the provisions of FIN 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FAS
109, Accounting for Income Taxes
, (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes, by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also
provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact to Cynosure.
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
Basic net income (loss) per share is determined by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is determined by dividing net income by the diluted weighted
average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted weighted average shares reflect the dilutive effect, if any, of common stock options based on the treasury stock method.
The reconciliation of basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
12,581
|
|
11,993
|
Weighted average common equivalent shares
|
|
225
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
12,806
|
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
For the year ended December 31, 2008, options to purchase approximately 1.1 million were
excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted average common shares outstanding as their effect was antidilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2007, options to purchase approximately 249,000 were excluded from the calculation of diluted
weighted average common shares outstanding as their effect was antidilutive.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, the number of
basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding were the same. The Company had outstanding options to purchase approximately 2.2 million shares of the Companys common stock that were potential dilutive securities outstanding as of
December 31, 2006; however, any increase in the number of shares of common stock equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2006 would be antidilutive based on the net loss for that year and therefore were not included.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(R),
Applying the Acquisition Method
(SFAS No. 141(R)), which replaces FASB Statement No. 141,
Business Combinations
. This Statement retains the fundamental
requirements in Statement 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This Statement
defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control. Statement 141 did not define the acquirer, although it
included guidance on identifying the acquirer, as does this Statement. SFAS No. 141(R) scope is broader than that of Statement 141, which applied only to business combinations in which control was obtained by transferring consideration. By
applying the same method of accountingthe acquisition methodto all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses, this Statement improves the comparability of the information about
business combinations provided in financial reports. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities
. This Statement requires enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities to enable investors to better understand a companys use of derivative instruments and their effect on a companys financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. This Statement is effective for us beginning on January 1, 2009.
3. Royalty Settlement
On November 6, 2006, Cynosure entered into a non-exclusive cross patent agreement with Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc.
(Palomar). Under the cross-license agreement, Cynosure obtained a non-exclusive license to integrate into its products certain hair removal technology covered by specified U.S. and foreign patents held by Palomar and Palomar obtained a non-exclusive
license under certain U.S. and foreign patents held by Cynosure. In November 2006, Cynosure made a payment to Palomar of $10 million for royalties related to sales prior to October 1, 2006 of hair removal-only systems including Cynosures
Apogee family of products,
PhotoLight
,
Acclaim 7000
and the
PhotoSilk Plus
. Cynosure recorded this amount as a royalty settlement within Cynosures operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006.
In connection with this agreement, Cynosure also agreed to pay royalties to Palomar on Cynosures future sales of certain hair removal products.
The royalty rate for future sales of hair removal products ranges from 3.75% to 7.5% of net sales beginning October 1, 2006, depending upon product configuration and the number of energy sources. Royalty expense associated with such sales is
recorded as cost of revenues. Cynosures revenue from systems that do not include hair removal capabilities and revenue from service is not subject to any past or future royalties under the Palomar agreement.
F-15
4. Fair Value
Effective January 1, 2008, Cynosure adopted FASB Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally
accepted accounting principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under SFAS No. 157 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the
principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under SFAS No. 157 must maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes the following fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to
measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices
in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable markets data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
|
Cynosures long-term investments and related financial instruments consist of tax exempt certificates with an
auction reset feature (auction rate securities or ARS) whose underlying assets are generally student loans, which are substantially backed by the federal government. In February 2008, auctions began to fail for these securities and each auction
since then has failed, with one exception. To date the Company has collected all interest receivable on outstanding ARS when due and expects to continue to do so in the future. During the year ended December 31, 2008, certain investments in ARS
were successfully called at full par value and Cynosure received cash proceeds of approximately $8.2 million. In January 2009, an additional $1.7 million in cash proceeds was received by Cynosure related to certain investments in ARSs that were
successfully called at full par value.
While the auction failures will limit the Companys ability to liquidate these investments,
Cynosure believes that the ARS failures will not have an impact on its ability to fund ongoing operations and growth initiatives. Cynosure continues to monitor efforts by the financial markets to find alternative means for restoring the
liquidity of these investments.
As of December 31, 2008, Cynosure held $21.1 million, at par value, of auction rate securities
investments. The auction rate securities are managed by UBS Financial Services, Inc. (UBS). On November 3, 2008, Cynosure agreed to accept Auction Rate Security Rights (the Rights) from UBS offered through a prospectus filed on October 7,
2008. The Rights permit Cynosure to sell, or put, its ARS at par value to UBS at any time during the period from June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012. Cynosure expects to exercise its ARS Rights and put its auction rate securities to
UBS on June 30, 2010, the earliest date allowable under the Rights.
Simultaneously, Cynosure transferred the ARS investments, at their
fair value of $16.8 million, from available-for-sale to trading marketable securities, in accordance with SFAS No. 115. As a result of this transfer, Cynosure recognized an other-than-temporary loss of $4.3 million in other income
(expense) in the statement of operations, Cynosure anticipates that any future changes in the fair value of the ARS will be mostly offset by the changes in the fair value of the related Rights, both of which will be adjusted to their estimated fair
value on an ongoing basis. As a result of the illiquidity in the market for ARS investments, Cynosure has estimated the fair value of its ARS and the Rights using a Level 3 valuation methodology. Cynosure measured the value of the Rights under
the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157, and recorded a gain of $4.3 million in other income (expense), and a corresponding non-current asset within the consolidated balance sheet. Given the current failures in the auction markets to
provide quoted market prices of the securities, as well as the lack of any correlation of these instruments to other observable market data, Cynosure valued these securities using a
F-16
discounted cash flow methodology with the most significant input categorized as Level 3. Significant inputs that went into the model were the credit quality
of the issuer, the percentage and types of guarantees (such as Federal Family Education Loan Program FFELP), the probability of the auction succeeding or the security being called, the estimated period to liquidation, and an illiquidity
discount factor. Based on these inputs, discounts from par ranged from 17% to 44% with a weighted average discount across the portfolio of 21%.
In accordance with SFAS No. 157, the following table represents Cynosures fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (cash equivalents, marketable securities, long-term investments and related financial instruments) measured
at fair value as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
Money market funds(1)
|
|
$
|
34,219
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
34,219
|
State and municipal bonds(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,593
|
Corporate obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,343
|
US government sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,508
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,803
|
|
|
16,803
|
Auction rate securities rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,279
|
|
|
4,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
34,229
|
|
$
|
27,444
|
|
$
|
21,082
|
|
$
|
82,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Included in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2008.
|
(2)
|
$2.3 million included in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2008.
|
The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of Cynosures Level 3 financial assets for the year ended December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction
Rate
Securities
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
29,300
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment charge included in (loss) on investments
|
|
|
(4,322
|
)
|
Realized gain related to value of ARS Rights included in gain on investments
|
|
|
4,279
|
|
Net settlements
|
|
|
(8,175
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
21,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Marketable Securities, Long-term Investments and Related Financial Instruments
Cynosures available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2008 consist of approximately $27.5 million of investments in debt securities
consisting of state and municipal bonds, federal agency notes and corporate obligations and approximately $10,000 in equity securities. As of December 31, 2008, Cynosures equity securities consist of 5,340 shares of common stock of a
public company with a fair market value of approximately $10,000. These shares were acquired in connection with the sale of Cynosures investment in a private company during the year ended December 31, 2006 and are considered
available-for-sale securities in accordance with SFAS No. 115. (See Note 11 for further discussion.) Cynosures trading securities at December 31, 2008 consist of approximately $16.8 million of investments in auction rate securities.
All investments in available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair market value, with any unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. All investments in trading securities are recorded at
fair market value, with any adjustments recorded to earnings.
F-17
As of December 31, 2008, Cynosures marketable securities consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Available-for-sale Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal bonds
|
|
$
|
2,342
|
|
|
$
|
2,341
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,342
|
|
|
$
|
2,341
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal bonds
|
|
$
|
14,251
|
|
|
$
|
14,167
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
$
|
|
|
Corporate obligations
|
|
|
9,343
|
|
|
|
9,310
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
US government sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$
|
25,112
|
|
|
$
|
24,983
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
27,454
|
|
|
$
|
27,324
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
$
|
16,790
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities
|
|
$
|
44,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Excludes $4.3 million for fair value of ARS Rights
|
During the year ended December 31, 2007, Cynosure concluded that its equity security investment in shares of common stock of another public company was other than temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2007 due to its consistent
decline in value and public notification that the security is at risk of being delisted from the NASDAQ exchange. As such, Cynosure recorded an other than temporary impairment charge of approximately $235,000 on the investment, which is included in
the consolidated statement of operations, for the year ended December 31, 2007.
As of December 31, 2008, Cynosures
available-for-sale debt securities mature as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
Less Than One Year
|
|
One to Five Years
|
|
More than five years
|
State and municipal bonds
|
|
$
|
14,251
|
|
$
|
13,612
|
|
$
|
639
|
|
$
|
|
Corporate obligations
|
|
|
9,343
|
|
|
8,572
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
US government sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale debt securities
|
|
$
|
25,102
|
|
$
|
23,692
|
|
$
|
1,410
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Acquisitions
In December 2008, Cynosure established a wholly-owned subsidiary in Korea, Cynosure, Korea Limited. (Cynosure Korea) in order to acquire the aesthetic laser sales division of Orient MG CO, Ltd. (Orient MG), an
independent distributor of Cynosures products and services in the Korean market. On December 3, 2008, Cynosure Korea acquired the aesthetic laser business and assets of Orient MG through an asset purchase agreement for $1.0 million, which
consisted of a cash payment of $464,000 by Cynosure and Cynosures forgiveness of $536,000 in accounts payable due to Cynosure and $50,000 of direct legal costs. The business purpose of this acquisition was to gain the ability to sell directly
in Korea by acquiring the product registration licenses, customer lists and hire the employees operating this division from Orient MG. The assets acquired from Orient MG over which the purchase price was allocated in accordance with SFAS
No. 141,
Business Combinations
, included $164,000 of intangible assets, related to product registration rights and customer lists,
F-18
with the remaining purchase price of $886,000 allocated to goodwill. Cynosure assigned an estimated useful life of five years to the product registration
licenses, which was based on product lifecycles, and assigned an estimated useful life of two years to the customer lists. The resulting goodwill was recorded with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment at least annually, and on an
interim basis, as needed, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
.
On
August 31, 2006, Cynosure acquired the remaining 48% minority interest in Suzhou Cynosure Medical Devices Company, Ltd.s (Suzhou) outstanding common stock for a purchase price of $640,000 in cash. Cynosure did not incur any material
closing costs related to the purchase and, as such, the $640,000 cash consideration represents the entire purchase price. The business purpose of acquiring the minority interest was to gain complete control over Suzhou while extending the business
license of Suzhou. The purchase of the minority interest was contingent upon Chinese government approval of the shareholder transfer from the seller to Cynosure for the shares acquired and approval of extension of the business license of Suzhou for
a period of 20 years. The existing business license was set to expire on October 12, 2007. On November 10, 2006, Suzhou received such approval from the Chinese government, evidenced by the issuance of a new business license allowing
operations in China until October 12, 2027.
In accordance with SFAS No. 141,
the acquisition of the
minority interest was accounted for as a business combination, which required allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. As such, the aggregate purchase price of $640,000 was allocated to the net assets acquired
from the minority interest holders of Suzhou, which had a total value of $357,000 and consisted primarily of $263,000 of cash, $148,000 of accounts receivable, $487,000 of inventory, $36,000 of other assets, and $190,000 of other current liabilities
as of August 31, 2006, with the residual of $283,000 allocated to the business license, which is subject to amortization due to its limited useful life. This acquired intangible asset is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a 20-year period, which approximates the expected cash flows resulting from the underlying asset.
7. Segment and Geographic Information
In accordance
with SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information
(SFAS No. 131), operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available
for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance. Cynosures chief decision-maker, as defined under SFAS No. 131, is a combination of the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. Cynosure views its operations and manages its business as one segment, aesthetic treatment products and services.
The following table represents total revenue by geographic destination:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
United States
|
|
$
|
85,736
|
|
$
|
71,605
|
|
$
|
39,670
|
Europe
|
|
|
27,716
|
|
|
27,373
|
|
|
20,011
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
16,237
|
|
|
12,970
|
|
|
10,356
|
Other
|
|
|
9,973
|
|
|
12,367
|
|
|
8,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
139,662
|
|
$
|
124,315
|
|
$
|
78,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
Net assets by geographic area are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
136,672
|
|
|
$
|
118,074
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
6,116
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(4,416
|
)
|
|
|
(4,149
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
140,354
|
|
|
$
|
120,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets by geographic area are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
United States
|
|
$
|
9,035
|
|
$
|
7,829
|
Europe
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
589
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
169
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,071
|
|
$
|
8,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No individual country within Europe or Asia/Pacific represented greater than 10% of total revenue
or net assets for any period presented.
8. Balance Sheet Accounts
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Useful
Life
(Years)
|
|
2008
Cost
|
|
|
2007
Cost
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Equipment
|
|
3-5
|
|
$
|
3,038
|
|
|
$
|
2,857
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
5
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
Computer equipment and software
|
|
3
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
5
|
|
|
1,540
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
Demonstration equipment
|
|
3
|
|
|
13,200
|
|
|
|
10,422
|
|
Revenue sharing lasers
|
|
3
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
Construction in-progress
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,398
|
|
|
|
17,854
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
(13,976
|
)
|
|
|
(10,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,422
|
|
|
$
|
7,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in-progress, as of December 31, 2007, primarily relates to Cynosures
software development costs that are being capitalized in accordance with AICPAs Statement of Position (SOP) 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use
. During 2008, these costs were
transferred into use, are being capitalized as computer software and depreciated over their estimated useful life.
F-20
Depreciation expense relating to property and equipment was $3.6 million, $2.7 million and $2.3 million
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the cost of assets recorded under capitalized leases was approximately $2.8 million for both years, and the related accumulated
amortization was approximately $1.9 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Amortization expense of assets recorded under capitalized leases is included as a component of depreciation expense.
Accrued Expenses
Accrued
expenses consist of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Accrued payroll and taxes
|
|
$
|
2,719
|
|
$
|
2,991
|
Accrued employee benefits
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
432
|
Accrued warranty costs
|
|
|
3,614
|
|
|
3,392
|
Accrued commissions
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
|
3,534
|
Accrued legal fees
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
126
|
Accrued income tax
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
2,718
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
5,340
|
|
|
4,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,602
|
|
$
|
17,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Investment in Sona MedSpa
In October 2005, Cynosure entered into a preferred vendor agreement with Sona MedSpa International, Inc. (Sona MedSpa) whereby Cynosure sold certain laser systems to Sona Medspa for approximately $1.3 million, which
was recorded as deferred revenue as of December 31, 2005 because the fee was not fixed or determinable at the time of sale.
In March
2006, Sona MedSpa notified Cynosure that Sona MedSpa was uncertain that it had the financial resources to honor its commitments to Cynosure and Cynosure determined that the collectibility of the fee was not probable and, as a result, reversed the
related deferred revenue. Cynosure expensed as cost of goods sold approximately $0.7 million of inventory delivered under the agreement. Additionally, Cynosure provided an allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.5 million for accounts receivable
associated with services provided prior to the October 2005 preferred vendor agreement. In 2006, Cynosure terminated the agreement with Sona MedSpa.
In November 2006, Cynosure entered into a settlement agreement with Sona MedSpa pursuant to which each party released its claims against each other in exchange for the payment by Sona MedSpa of $250,000 in cash
to Cynosure. This settlement payment was initially recorded as an accrued expense in 2006 as it was subject to certain avoidance actions by a third-party and, therefore, was subject to forfeiture. In 2007, the period during which this settlement
payment was subject to forfeiture lapsed; therefore, the settlement payment, which was in reimbursement for legal expenses, was recorded as a reduction in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
10. Investment in OccuLogix, Inc.
In August 2006, Cynosure sold its 2% ownership interest in Solx, Inc., a private company, to OccuLogix, Inc., a public company, in exchange for
consideration consisting of (1) approximately $379,000 in cash, and (2) 133,511 shares of common stock of the acquiring company with a fair market value of approximately $270,000 at the time of the sale. As a result of this sale, during
the year ended December 31, 2006, Cynosure received approximately $105,000 in cash and recorded a gain of approximately $118,000, which is included in gain on sale of investment in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The
remaining cash
F-21
consideration of approximately $274,000 is to be paid in the following installments: $64,000 in August 2007, $105,000 in August 2008 and $105,000 upon the
achievement of a certain contingent event, as specified in the transaction agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2007, Cynosure received the August 2007 payment of $64,000 in cash and recorded this as gain on sale of investment in the
consolidated statements of operations. Cynosure did not receive any payment in the year ended December 31, 2008. Due to collection based on a contingent event and uncertainty regarding collection of the August 2008 payment, Cynosure deferred
the gain related to the remaining cash consideration of $210,000 and will record this as a gain if and when it receives the remaining cash payments.
The value of the shares of the acquiring companys common stock is included in Cynosures marketable securities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as they are considered available-for-sale
securities in accordance with SFAS No. 115
.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, Cynosure concluded that the value of these shares was other than temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2007 due to its consistent decline in
value and public notification that the security is at risk of being delisted from the NASDAQ exchange. As such, Cynosure recorded an impairment charge of approximately $235,000, net of related taxes, as an other than temporary impairment on the
investment in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007.
11. Related Party Transactions
Purchases of inventory from El.En. during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were approximately $15.8 million, $8.1
million and $3.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, amounts due to related party for these purchases were approximately $6.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively. Amounts due from El.En. as of December 31, 2008 and
2007 were $40,000 and $8,000, respectively, which represent services performed by Cynosure.
12. Stockholders Equity
Common Stock Authorized
Cynosure has a dual class capital structure consisting of $0.001 par value class A and class B common stock,. Cynosure has authorized 61,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value class A common stock and 8,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value class
B common stock. As of December 31, 2008, there were 9,759,562 shares of class A common stock issued and 2,975,297 shares of class B common stock issued.
The rights, preferences and privileges of each class of common stock are as follows:
Voting Rights
The holders of class A common stock and class B common stock have identical rights and will be entitled to one vote per share with
respect to each matter presented to Cynosure stockholders on which the holders of common stock are entitled to vote, except for the approval rights of the holders of the class B common stock applicable to specified amendments to Cynosures
certificate of incorporation and amendments of Cynosures bylaws by stockholders and except with respect to the election and removal of directors. El.En., Cynosures largest stockholder, is able to control the election of a majority of the
members of Cynosures board of directors. El.En. owns 99.98% of Cynosures outstanding class B common stock, which comprises 23% of Cynosures aggregate outstanding common stock. Until El.En. beneficially owns less than 20% of the
aggregate number of shares of Cynosures class A common stock and class B common stock outstanding or less than 50% of the number of shares of Cynosures class B common stock outstanding, El.En., as holder of a majority of the shares of
Cynosures class B common stock, will have the right:
|
|
|
to elect a majority of the members of Cynosures board of directors;
|
|
|
|
to approve amendments to the bylaws adopted by Cynosures class A and class B stockholders, voting as a single class; and
|
F-22
|
|
|
to approve amendments to any provisions of Cynosures restated certificate of incorporation relating to the rights of holders of common stock, the powers,
election and classification of the board of directors, corporate opportunities and the rights of holders of class A common stock and class B common stock to elect and remove directors, act by written consent and call special meetings of
stockholders.
|
In addition, the holders of shares of Cynosures class B common stock will vote with Cynosures class A
stockholders for the election of the remaining directors.
Conversion
Cynosures class A common stock is not convertible into any other shares of Cynosures capital stock.
Each share of class B common stock is convertible into one share of class A common stock at any time at the option of the holder. In addition, each share
of class B common stock shall convert automatically into one share of class A common stock upon any transfer of such share of class B common stock, whether or not for value.
Dividends
Subject to
preferences that may apply to any shares of preferred stock outstanding at the time, the holders of class A common stock and class B common stock shall be entitled to share equally, on a per share basis, in any dividends that Cynosures board
of directors may determine to issue from time to time.
Liquidation Rights
In the event of Cynosures liquidation or dissolution, the holders of class A common stock and class B common stock shall be entitled to share
equally, on a per share basis, in all assets remaining after the payment of all debts and other liabilities and subject to the prior rights of any outstanding preferred stock.
Preferred Stock
Cynosure has
authorized 5,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value preferred stock. The Board of Directors has full authority to issue this stock and to fix the voting powers, preference rights, qualifications, limitations, or restrictions thereof, including dividend
rights, conversion rights, redemption privileges and liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any series or designation of such series.
13. Stock-Based Compensation
1992 Stock Option Plan
In February 1992, the Board of Directors adopted, and the stockholders approved, the 1992 Stock Option Plan (the 1992 Plan). The 1992 Plan provided for
the grant of incentive stock options (ISOs), as well as nonstatutory options. The Board of Directors administered the 1992 Plan and had sole discretion to grant options to purchase shares of the Companys common stock.
The Board of Directors determined the term of each option, option price, number of shares for which each option was granted, whether restrictions would
be imposed on the shares subject to options and the rate at which each option was exercisable. The exercise price for options granted was determined by the Board of Directors, except that for ISOs, the exercise price could not be less than the fair
market value per share of the underlying common stock on the date granted (110% of fair market value for ISOs granted to holders of more than 10% of the voting stock of the Cynosure). The term of the options were set forth in the applicable option
agreements, except that in the case of ISOs, the option term was not to exceed ten years (five years for ISOs granted to holders of more than 10% of voting stock of the Cynosure). A maximum of 2,250,000 shares of common stock
F-23
were reserved for issuance in accordance with the 1992 Plan. Options granted under the 1992 Plan vested either (i) over a 50-month period at the rate of
24% after the first year and 2% each month thereafter until fully vested or (ii) after eight years with acceleration of vesting if certain performance measures were met, as defined in the agreements. All options granted under the 1992 Plan to
date were issued at fair market value as determined by the Board of Directors. The 1992 Plan expired on the tenth anniversary of the date of its adoption by the Board of Directors in February 2002. Options outstanding as of this date continue to
have force and effect in accordance with the provisions of the instruments evidencing such options.
2004 Stock Option Plan
In October 2004, the Board of Directors adopted and the stockholders approved the 2004 Stock Option Plan (the 2004 Plan). The 2004 Plan
provided for the grant of ISOs, as well as nonstatutory options. The Board of Directors administers the 2004 Plan and had sole discretion to grant options to purchase shares of Cynosures common stock.
The Board of Directors determines the term of each option, option price, number of shares for which each option is granted, whether restrictions would be
imposed on the shares subject to options and the rate at which each option is exercisable. The exercise price for options granted is determined by the Board of Directors, except that for ISOs, the exercise price could not be less than the fair
market value per share of the underlying common stock on the date granted (110% of fair market value for ISOs granted to holders of more than 10% of the voting stock of Cynosure). The term of the options is set forth in the applicable option
agreement, except that in the case of ISOs, the option term cannot exceed ten years. Options granted under the Plan vested either (i) over a 48-month period at the rate of 25% after the first year and 6.25% each quarter thereafter until fully
vested or (ii) over a vesting period determined by the Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2007, there are no shares available for future grant under the 2004 Plan.
2005 Stock Incentive Plan
In
August 2005, the Board of Directors adopted the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2005 Plan), which was approved by Cynosures stockholders in December 2005. The 2005 Plan provided for the grant of ISOs, as well as nonstatutory options. The Board
of Directors administers the 2005 Plan and had sole discretion to grant options to purchase shares of Cynosures common stock.
The
Board of Directors determines the term of each option, option price, number of shares for which each option is granted, whether restrictions would be imposed on the shares subject to options and the rate at which each option is exercisable. The
exercise price for options granted is determined by the Board of Directors, except that for ISOs, the exercise price could not be less than the fair market value per share of the underlying common stock on the date granted (110% of fair market value
for ISOs granted to holders of more than 10% of the voting stock of Cynosure). The term of the options is set forth in the applicable option agreement, except that in the case of ISOs, the option term cannot exceed ten years. The number of shares of
class A common stock reserved for issuance under the 2005 Plan is 1,588,369 shares. Options granted under the Plan vested either (i) over a 48-month period at the rate of 25% after the first year and 6.25% each quarter thereafter until fully
vested or (ii) over a vesting period determined by the Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2008, there are 268,051 shares available for future grant under the 2005 Plan.
F-24
Stock option activity under the 1992 Plan, the 2004 Plan and the 2005 Plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
Range
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in
thousands)
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2007
|
|
1,355,797
|
|
|
$
|
3.00 - $39.39
|
|
$
|
17.33
|
|
8.31 years
|
|
$
|
14,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
372,090
|
|
|
|
3.00 - 25.48
|
|
|
21.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
(286,075
|
)
|
|
|
3.00 - 23.97
|
|
|
5.65
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,970
|
Forfeited
|
|
(91,565
|
)
|
|
|
3.50 - 36.94
|
|
|
24.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2008
|
|
1,350,247
|
|
|
$
|
3.00 - $39.39
|
|
$
|
20.48
|
|
7.89 years
|
|
$
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest, December 31, 2008
|
|
1,300,341
|
|
|
$
|
3.00 - $39.39
|
|
$
|
18.23
|
|
7.66 years
|
|
$
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2008
|
|
702,588
|
|
|
$
|
3.00 - $39.39
|
|
$
|
17.75
|
|
7.36 years
|
|
$
|
1,086
|
14. Income Taxes
Income (loss) before income tax (benefit) provision and minority interest consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
11,735
|
|
$
|
17,694
|
|
$
|
(3,575
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
3,235
|
|
|
5,094
|
|
|
2,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,970
|
|
$
|
22,788
|
|
$
|
(870
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for (benefit from) income taxes consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
5,691
|
|
|
$
|
7,602
|
|
|
$
|
(125
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
7,590
|
|
|
|
10,018
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(2,360
|
)
|
|
|
(1,326
|
)
|
|
|
(1,064
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
(2,819
|
)
|
|
|
(1,742
|
)
|
|
|
(1,079
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,771
|
|
|
$
|
8,276
|
|
|
$
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
A reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to Cynosures effective tax rate is as follows for
the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) at federal statutory rate:
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
Increase (decrease) in tax resulting from -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Nondeductible expenses
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
Tax-exempt interest income
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
(18.1
|
)
|
Effect of foreign taxes
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
(22.1
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
Research and development credit
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
Write off of deferred assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
Effect of IRS Exam settlement
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
31.9
|
%
|
|
36.3
|
%
|
|
(30.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant components of Cynosures net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2008 and
2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards and temporary differences
|
|
$
|
880
|
|
|
$
|
652
|
|
Reserves and allowances
|
|
|
2,472
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,337
|
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
Other temporary differences
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
7,863
|
|
|
|
4,987
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
7,481
|
|
|
$
|
4,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, Cynosure had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $2.4 million, available to reduce future foreign income related to Germany. Foreign net operating loss carryforwards in Germany do not expire. The valuation allowance as of December 31, 2008, relates to foreign net operating loss
carryforwards. The valuation allowance as of December 31, 2007 relates to state tax credit carryforwards and German loss carryforwards.
In 2008, under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Cynosure recognized a total tax benefit of approximately $1.6 million for stock based compensation deductions, which were recorded though additional paid-in capital. This amount
represents the cash benefit that Cynosure expects to receive on its 2008 federal and state tax filings. Cynosure also has $0.3 million of state credits that when utilized, will benefit additional paid-in capital.
No amount for U.S. income tax has been provided on undistributed earnings of the Companys foreign subsidiaries because the Company considers such
earnings to be indefinitely reinvested. In the event of distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, Cynosure may be subject to both U.S. income taxes, subject to an adjustment, in any, for foreign tax credits, and foreign
withholding taxes payable to certain foreign tax authorities. Determination of the amount of U.S. income tax liability that would be incurred is not practicable because of the complexities associated with this hypothetical calculation.
F-26
Cynosure adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertain Tax
Positions,
on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, Cynosure had no material unrecognized tax benefits.
Cynosure files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and in various state and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, Cynosure is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by
tax authorities for years before 2006.
Cynosure classifies interest and penalties related to income taxes as a component of its provision
for income taxes, and the amount of interest and penalties recorded as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 in the statement of operations and balance sheet was immaterial.
During 2008, Cynosure settled a federal IRS audit of its 2003 to 2005 tax filings. Cynosure adjusted certain intercompany transactions and recorded a provision for income taxes of $960,000 for the tax liability.
No significant changes or material settlements for uncertain tax positions are expected in the next reporting year.
15. 401(k) Plan
Cynosure sponsors the Cynosure
401(k) defined contribution plan. Participation in the plan is available to all employees of Cynosure who meet certain eligibility requirements. The Plan is qualified under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, and is subject to
contribution limitations as set annually by the Internal Revenue Service. Employer matching contributions are at Cynosures discretion. Cynosures contributions to this plan totaled approximately $366,000, $135,000 and $42,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
16. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Commitments
Cynosure
leases its U.S. operating facility and certain foreign facilities under noncancelable operating lease agreements expiring through March 2012. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $1.1 million, $1.3
million and $1.0 million, respectively.
Cynosure leases certain equipment and vehicles under operating and capital lease agreements with
payments due through December 2012.
Commitments under Cynosures lease arrangements are as follows, in thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Leases
|
|
Capital
Leases
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,178
|
|
$
|
470
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,090
|
|
|
300
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
143
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
32
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
4,627
|
|
$
|
951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less amount representing interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
834
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
Lease Guarantees
During 2000 and 2001, Cynosure guaranteed the lease obligations for two locations that are operated by Sona MedSpa, and will be obligated to pay these
leases if Sona MedSpa cannot make the required lease payments. Minimum lease payments guaranteed by Cynosure as of December 31, 2008 are as follows, in thousands:
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
42
|
2010 and thereafter
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments guaranteed by Cynosure
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation
In May 2005, Dr. Ari Weitzner, individually and as putative representative of a purported class, filed a complaint against Cynosure under the federal
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) in Massachusetts Superior Court in Middlesex County seeking monetary damages, injunctive relief, costs and attorneys fees. The complaint alleges that Cynosure violated the TCPA by sending unsolicited
advertisements by facsimile to the plaintiff and other recipients without the prior express invitation or permission of the recipients. Under the TCPA, recipients of unsolicited facsimile advertisements are entitled to damages of up to $500 per
facsimile for inadvertent violations and up to $1,500 per facsimile for knowing or willful violations. Based on discovery in this matter, the plaintiff alleges that approximately three million facsimiles were sent on Cynosures behalf by a
third party to approximately 100,000 individuals. On February 6, 2008, several months after the close of discovery, the plaintiff served a motion for class certification, which Cynosure vigorously opposed on numerous factual and legal grounds,
including that a nationwide class action may not be maintained in a Massachusetts state court by Dr. Weitzner, a New York resident; individual issues predominate over common issues; a class action is not superior to other methods of resolving
TCPA claims; and Dr. Weitzner is an inadequate class representative. The Company also believes it has many merits defenses, including that the faxes in question do not constitute advertising within the meaning of the TCPA and many
recipients had an established business relationship with the Company and are thereby deemed to have consented to the receipt of facsimile communications. The court held a hearing on the plaintiffs class certification motion on June 17,
2008. Cynosure is not currently able to estimate the amount or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome of this lawsuit.
On July 16, 2008, Cynosure commenced a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts requesting a declaration that Dr. Weitzners and the putative class claims are covered
under the Companys general liability insurance policies. On August 11, 2008, Cynosures insurance company filed an Answer and Counterclaim against Cynosure seeking a declaration that the Companys policy does not provide
coverage for Dr. Weitzners claims. On August 19, 2008, Cynosure filed a reply to the Counterclaim. The insurance company filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on December 15, 2008, and Cynosure cross moved for Summary Judgment on
January 15, 2009. The court held a hearing on the motions on February 26, 2009, and took the matter under advisement. Cynosure is not able to estimate the amount or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome of the lawsuit
as the matter is still in the early stages of the proceedings. On January 9, 2008, Cynosure commenced a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts against CoolTouch Inc. for infringement of U.S. Patent
No. 6,206,873, or the 873 patent. Cynosures complaint alleges that CoolTouchs CoolLipo infringes on the 873 patent and seeks damages and injunctive relief. On January 31, 2008, CoolTouch answered Cynosures
complaint, denying liability and alleging that the 873 patent is not infringed and is invalid, and also asserted counterclaims against Cynosure in the same court alleging patent infringement by Cynosure. CoolTouchs counterclaim alleges that
Cynosures
Affirm
product infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,122,029 and 6,451,007, and that its
Smartlipo
product infringes U.S. Patent No. 7,217,265, and seeks damages in an unspecified amount, as well as injunctive relief.
Cynosure is vigorously prosecuting its claims against CoolTouch and defending against CoolTouchs counterclaims. Cynosure is not able to estimate the amount or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome of the lawsuit as the
matter is still in the early stages of the proceedings.
F-28
On March 3, 2009, Cynosure announced that the United States District Court for the District of
Massachusetts had issued a favorable set of rulings in a Markman hearing in the Companys patent infringement lawsuit against CoolTouch Inc. The lawsuit alleges that CoolTouchs 1320 nm CoolLipo laser system infringes on U.S. Patent
No. 6,206,873 (the 873 patent), which relates to methods for liquefying and removing subcutaneous fat cells through the use of laser energy. The 873 patent is owned by the companys largest shareholder, El.En. S.p.A.
The purpose of a Markman hearing is for the court to determine the meaning and scope of the patent claims that the plaintiff asserts are being infringed.
In Cynosures lawsuit, the meaning of four terms used in the 873 patent was contested by CoolTouch. In each instance, U.S. District court ruled in our favor regarding how those terms should be properly construed at trial.
In addition to the matters discussed above, from time to time, Cynosure is subject to various claims, lawsuits, disputes with third parties,
investigations and pending actions involving various allegations against Cynosure incident to the operation of its business, principally product liability. Each of these other matters is subject to various uncertainties, and it is possible that some
of these other matters may be resolved unfavorably to Cynosure. Cynosure establishes accruals for losses that management deems to be probable and subject to reasonable estimate. Cynosure believes that the ultimate outcome of these matters will not
have a material adverse impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
17. Summary Selected Quarterly Financial
Data (Unaudited)
During the fourth quarter of 2008, Cynosure recorded a write off of approximately $2.7 million related to
uncollectible accounts from certain customers affected by the overall economic environment and the tightening of the credit markets, which subsequently caused a number of practitioners to be unable to meet their payment obligations during the fourth
quarter.
The following table sets forth certain unaudited consolidated quarterly statement of operations data for the twelve quarters
ended December 31, 2008. This information is unaudited, but in the opinion of management, it has been prepared substantially on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and all necessary adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, have been included in the amounts stated below to state fairly the unaudited consolidated quarterly results of operations. The results of operations for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results of
operations for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2008
|
|
June 30,
2008
|
|
Sept. 30,
2008
|
|
Dec. 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
36,763
|
|
$
|
39,195
|
|
$
|
38,209
|
|
$
|
25,495
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
24,392
|
|
$
|
26,317
|
|
$
|
24,813
|
|
$
|
15,435
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
5,899
|
|
$
|
6,793
|
|
$
|
4,927
|
|
$
|
(5,058
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
4,870
|
|
$
|
4,660
|
|
$
|
3,163
|
|
$
|
(2,494
|
)
|
Basic net income per share
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
2007
|
|
June 30,
2007
|
|
Sept. 30,
2007
|
|
Dec. 31,
2007
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
26,077
|
|
$
|
30,132
|
|
$
|
31,533
|
|
$
|
36,573
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
16,155
|
|
$
|
19,064
|
|
$
|
20,488
|
|
$
|
24,101
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
2,875
|
|
$
|
4,489
|
|
$
|
5,567
|
|
$
|
6,646
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,118
|
|
$
|
2,711
|
|
$
|
4,377
|
|
$
|
5,306
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
F-29
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-127463))
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-127463))
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen certificate evidencing shares of class A common stock (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-127463))
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
1992 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-127463))
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
2004 Stock Option Plan, as amended (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-127463))
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
2005 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-127463))
|
|
|
10.4*
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008, between the Company and Michael Davin (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed December
19, 2008)
|
|
|
10.5*
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2003, between the Company and George Cho (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-127463))
|
|
|
10.6*
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008, between the Company and Douglas Delaney (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed December
19, 2008)
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Distribution Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2005, between the Company and El.En. S.p.A. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(333-127463))
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Distribution Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2005, between the Company and El.En. S.p.A. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(333-127463))
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Promissory Note, dated October 1, 2004, between the Company and El.En. S.p.A. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-127463))
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Lease, dated January 31, 2005, between Glenborough Fund V, Limited Partnership and the Company, as amended (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (333-127463))
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Reimbursement Agreement among the Company, El.En. S.p.A. and BRCT, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(333-127463))
|
|
|
10.12*
|
|
Option Agreement, dated December 17, 2003, between El.En. and Michael Davin (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(333-127463))
|
|
|
10.13*
|
|
Option Agreement, dated May 13, 2005, between El.En. and Michael Davin (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(333-127463))
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Non-Exclusive Patent License, dated November 6, 2006, between Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. and the Company (Incorporated by reference to the exhibit to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed November 7, 2006)
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
10.15*
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008, between the Company and Timothy W. Baker (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed December
19, 2008)
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
*
|
Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(c) of Form 10-K.
|
|
Confidential treatment granted as to certain portions, which portions have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
Cynosure (NASDAQ:CYNO)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Cynosure (NASDAQ:CYNO)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024