UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2009
Commission File Number 000-25193
CAPITAL CROSSING PREFERRED CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
04-3439366
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
1271
Avenue of the Americas,
46
th
Floor, New York, New York
(Address of principal executive offices)
(646) 333-8809
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants sole class of common stock was 100 shares,
$.01 par value per share, as of May 20, 2009. No common stock was held by non-affiliates of the
issuer.
Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Financial Statements
Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation
Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash account with parent
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits with parent
|
|
|
45,935
|
|
|
|
43,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
46,134
|
|
|
|
43,757
|
|
Loans held
for sale
|
|
|
35,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for investment, net of discounts and net deferred loan income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,998
|
|
Less allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(915
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for investment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
81,890
|
|
|
$
|
96,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,146
|
|
|
$
|
931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, Series B, 8% cumulative, non-convertible;
$.01 par value; $1,000 liquidation value per share plus
accrued dividends; 1,000 shares authorized, 937 shares
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, Series D, 8.50% non-cumulative, exchangeable;
$.01 par value; $25 liquidation value per share; 1,725,000 shares
authorized, 1,500,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 100 shares authorized,
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
95,121
|
|
|
|
95,121
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(14,392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
80,744
|
|
|
|
95,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
81,890
|
|
|
$
|
96,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
1
Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation
Statements of Income
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans
|
|
$
|
829
|
|
|
$
|
1,295
|
|
Interest on interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(915
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
Valuation allowance on loans held for sale
|
|
|
(15,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
(13,246
|
)
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan servicing and advisory services
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Other general and administrative
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(13,576
|
)
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholder
|
|
$
|
(14,392
|
)
|
|
$
|
730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
2
Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation
Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Earnings /
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
Series D
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit )
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
95,121
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
95,136
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,576
|
)
|
|
|
(13,576
|
)
|
Cumulative dividends on preferred stock, Series B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Dividends on preferred stock, Series D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
95,121
|
|
|
$
|
(14,392
|
)
|
|
$
|
80,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
Series D
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
115,354
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
115,369
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
Cumulative dividends on preferred stock, Series B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Dividends on preferred stock, Series D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
115,354
|
|
|
$
|
730
|
|
|
$
|
116,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
3
Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation
Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(13,576
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,546
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
allowance on loans held for sale
|
|
|
15,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(915
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan repayments
|
|
|
2,271
|
|
|
|
2,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
2,271
|
|
|
|
2,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,377
|
|
|
|
3,122
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
43,757
|
|
|
|
50,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
46,134
|
|
|
$
|
53,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
4
Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation
Notes to Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
Note 1.
Basis of Presentation
Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation (the Company) is a Massachusetts corporation
organized on March 20, 1998, to acquire and hold real estate assets. The Companys current
principal business objective is to hold mortgage assets that will generate net income for
distribution to stockholders. The Company may acquire additional mortgage assets in the future,
although management currently has no intention of acquiring additional assets other than in
connection with the potential asset exchange (or alternative transaction) described below.
Effective as of April 27, 2009, Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, the owner of all of the Companys common
stock, formally changed its name to Aurora Bank FSB (prior to and after the name change, Aurora
Bank). Aurora Bank is a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LBHI; LBHI with its
subsidiaries, Lehman Brothers). Prior to the merger with Aurora Bank, which is further discussed
below, the Company was a subsidiary of Capital Crossing Bank (Capital Crossing), a federally
insured Massachusetts trust company, and Capital Crossing owned all of the Companys common stock.
The Company operates in a manner intended to allow it to be taxed as a real estate investment
trust, or a REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As a REIT, the Company
generally will not be required to pay federal income tax if it distributes its earnings to its
stockholders and continues to meet a number of other requirements.
On March 31, 1998, Capital Crossing capitalized the Company by transferring mortgage loans
valued at $140.7 million in exchange for 1,000 shares of the Companys 8% Cumulative
Non-Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B, valued at $1.0 million and 100 shares of the Companys
common stock valued at $139.7 million.
On May 11, 2004, the Company closed its public offering of 1,500,000 shares of its 8.50%
Non-Cumulative Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series D. The net proceeds to the Company from the
sale of Series D preferred stock was $35.3 million. The Series D preferred stock is redeemable at
the option of the Company on or after July 15, 2009, with the prior consent of the Office of Thrift
Supervision (the OTS).
On February 14, 2007, Capital Crossing was acquired by Aurora Bank through a two step merger
transaction. An interim thrift subsidiary of Aurora Bank was merged into Capital Crossing.
Immediately following such merger, Capital Crossing was merged into Aurora Bank. Under the terms of
the agreement, Lehman Brothers paid $30.00 per share in cash in exchange for each outstanding share
of Capital Crossing.
All shares of the Companys 9.75% Non-Cumulative Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A and
10.25% Non-Cumulative Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series C were redeemed on March 23, 2007. The
Companys Series B preferred stock and Series D preferred stock remain outstanding and remain
subject to their existing terms and conditions, including the call feature with respect to the
Series D preferred stock.
The financial information as of March 31, 2009 and the results of operations, changes in
stockholders equity and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are
unaudited; however, in the opinion of management, the financial information reflects all
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). On February 5, 2009, as discussed below, the
Company agreed to transfer 207 loans secured primarily by commercial real estate and multifamily
residential real estate to Aurora Bank in exchange for 205 loans secured primarily by residential
real estate. As a result, during the quarter the Company reclassified all of its loan assets as
held for sale and now records these loan assets at the lower of their cost or fair value in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 65, Accounting for Certain
Mortgage Banking Activities. Prior to February 5, 2009, the Companys loan assets were recorded at
historical cost adjusted for the amortization of any purchase discount and deferred fees less an
allowance for loan losses. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected
for the entire year. These interim financial statements are intended to be read in conjunction with
the financial statements presented in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K as of, and for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
In
preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management is required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date
of the balance sheet and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly
susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the fair value of
loans held for sale. The fair value of the Companys loan portfolio is estimated based upon an
internal analysis by management which considers, among other factors, information, to the extent
available, about then current sale prices, bids, credit quality,
liquidity and other available information for loans with
similar characteristics as the Companys loan portfolio. For a more detailed discussion of the
basis for the estimates of the fair value of the Companys loan portfolio, please see Note 5, Fair
Market Value of Loans Held for Sale below. Prior to February 5, 2009, material estimates also
included the determination of the allowance for losses on loans, the allocation of purchase
discount on loans between accretable and nonaccretable portions, and the rate at which the discount
is accreted into interest income.
5
Note 2.
Recent Developments
Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
On September 15, 2008, LBHI, the parent company of Aurora Bank, filed a voluntary petition
under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy code. The bankruptcy filing of LBHI has materially and
adversely affected the capital and liquidity of Aurora Bank, the parent of the Company. This has
led to increased regulatory constraints being placed on Aurora Bank by its bank regulatory
authorities, primarily the OTS. Certain of these constraints apply to Aurora Banks subsidiaries,
including the Company. As more fully discussed below, both the bankruptcy filing of LBHI and the
increased regulatory constraints placed on Aurora Bank have negatively impacted the Companys
ability to conduct its business according to its business objectives.
Abandoned Liquidation of the Company.
On October 27, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board of Directors)
unanimously approved, subject to obtaining the approval of the OTS, the voluntary complete
liquidation and dissolution of the Company. The liquidation and dissolution was approved by Aurora
Bank, in its capacity as the holder of all of the outstanding common stock of the Company. In
connection with the anticipated liquidation and dissolution, the Board of Directors also approved
the voluntary delisting of the Series D preferred stock from The NASDAQ Stock Market, which was
expected to occur concurrently with the consummation of the liquidation and dissolution.
On October 28, 2008, Aurora Bank made a formal request to the OTS for a letter of
non-objection with respect to the liquidation and dissolution of the Company. Following requests
for additional information by the OTS, a second non-objection request was submitted by Aurora Bank
on November 12, 2008. The OTS did not approve or grant a non-objection letter with respect to the
liquidation and dissolution of the Company. On November 26, 2008, however, the OTS notified Aurora
Bank that the outstanding Series D preferred stock of the Company would be afforded Tier 1 capital
treatment at Aurora Bank at a time while Aurora Banks capital levels were continuing to decrease.
Accordingly, given the refusal of the OTS to approve or grant a non-objection letter with respect
to the proposed liquidation and dissolution, the Board of Directors approved the abandonment of the
proposed liquidation and dissolution of the Company and the delisting of the Series D preferred
stock.
Asset Exchange
On February 5, 2009, the Company and Aurora Bank entered into an Asset Exchange Agreement
pursuant to which the Company agreed to transfer 207 loans secured primarily by commercial real
estate and multifamily residential real estate (together, the Loans) to Aurora Bank in exchange
for 205 loans secured primarily by residential real estate (the Exchange). The Loans represented
substantially all of the Companys assets, excluding cash and interest-bearing deposits as of
December 31, 2008. The Exchange is subject to certain conditions to closing as well as the receipt
of a non-objection letter from the OTS. Aurora Bank has made a formal request to the OTS for a
letter of non-objection with respect to the Exchange, but it has not yet received the non-objection
by the OTS in response to such request and there can be no assurances that the OTS will provide
this non-objection or that the conditions to closing of the Exchange will be satisfied. If
non-objection by the OTS is not received or the conditions to closing are not satisfied, the
Exchange will not be consummated. The Company continues to consider potential alternative
transactions during the pendency of the request for non-objection by the OTS, however there can be
no assurances that any such alternative transaction will occur. As a result of entering into the
Asset Exchange Agreement, the Company reclassified all of its loan assets as held for sale and now
records these loan assets at the lower of their cost or fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 65,
Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities.
Aurora Bank Regulatory Actions and Capital Levels
On January 26, 2009, the OTS entered a cease and desist order against Aurora Bank (the
Order). The Order, among other things, required Aurora Bank to file various privileged
prospective operating plans with the OTS to manage the liquidity and operations of Aurora Bank
going forward, including a strategic plan to be activated whenever Aurora Banks capital ratios are
less than specified levels. This strategic plan will remain operative until the OTS confirms that
the Order has been lifted based, among other things, on Aurora Banks capital ratios. The Order
requires Aurora Bank to ensure that each of its subsidiaries, including the Company, complies with
the Order, including the operating restrictions contained in the Order. These operating
restrictions, among other things, restrict transactions with affiliates, contracts outside the
ordinary course of business and changes in senior executive officers, board members or their
employment arrangements without prior written notice to the OTS. More detailed information can be
found in the Order itself, which was entered against Aurora Bank under its former name, Lehman
Brothers Bank, FSB, a copy of which is available on the OTS website. In addition, on February 4,
2009, the OTS issued a prompt corrective action directive to Aurora Bank (the PCA Directive). The
PCA Directive requires Aurora Bank to, among other things, raise its capital ratios such that it
will be deemed to be adequately capitalized and places additional constraints on Aurora Bank and
its subsidiaries, including the Company. More detailed information can be found in PCA Directive
itself, which was entered against Aurora Bank under its former name, Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, a
copy of which is available on the OTS website.
6
The OTS has informed Aurora Bank that prior approval of the OTS is not required under the
Order or the PCA Directive for payment by the Company of dividends on the Series D preferred stock.
There can be no assurance, however, that future dividends on the Series D preferred stock will not
require prior approval of the OTS. There also can be no assurance that such approvals, if required,
will be received from the OTS or when or if Aurora Bank will achieve sufficient regulatory
capitalization levels to remove any such OTS approval requirement. Furthermore, any future
dividends on the Series D preferred stock will be payable only when, as and if declared by the
Board of Directors.
During the first quarter of 2009, the bankruptcy court issued orders permitting LBHI to take
certain actions intended to strengthen the capital position of Aurora Bank, including: (1) the
contribution of up to an aggregate of $30 million in cash to Aurora Bank, (2) the transfer of
ownership of certain servicing rights to a subsidiary of Aurora Bank, (3) the waiver of the payment
by Aurora Bank and its subsidiaries of certain servicing fees to LBHI and (4) the termination of
unfunded loan commitments of Aurora Bank and its subsidiaries with specified borrowers. These
actions, together with others taken by Aurora Bank, resulted in Aurora Bank being adequately
capitalized as of March 31, 2009 under applicable regulatory guidelines according to a recent
public filing by Aurora Bank with the OTS. The classification of Aurora Banks capitalization
level, however, is subject to review and acceptance by the OTS.
Note 3.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. This standard defines fair values, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in conformity with GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Prior to
this standard, there were varying definitions of fair value and limited guidance for applying those
definitions under GAAP. In addition, the guidance was dispersed among many accounting
pronouncements that require fair value measurements. This standard was intended to increase
consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and disclosures about fair value
measurements. The provisions of this standard became effective January 1, 2008. The Company applies
the provisions of SFAS No. 157 in the determination of the fair value of the loan assets for
purposes of the determination of the lower of cost or fair value of the loans held for sale.
In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value
When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. FSP 157-4 emphasizes that the objective of fair
value measurement described in SFAS No. 157 remains unchanged and provides additional guidance for
determining whether market activity for a financial asset or liability has significantly decreased
and for identifying circumstances that indicate that transactions are not orderly. FSP 157-4
indicates that if a market is determined to be inactive and the related market price is deemed to
be reflective of a distressed sale price, then management judgment may be required to estimate
fair value. Further, FSP 157-4 identifies factors to be considered when determining whether or not
a market is inactive. FSP 157-4 is effective for the Company, as of June 30, 2009, with early
adoption permitted as of March 31, 2009. The Company did not elect to early-adopt the FSP, and is
currently evaluating the impact of adoption on the Companys financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 amend SFAS No. 107, Disclosures
About Fair Value of Financial Instruments
"
, and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28,
Interim Financial Reporting
to require disclosures about fair values of financial instruments in
all interim financial statements. Once adopted, the disclosures required by FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1
are to be provided prospectively. FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 are effective for the Company, as of June
30, 2009, with early adoption permitted as of March 31, 2009. The Company did not elect to
early-adopt either FSP 107-1 or APB 28-1.
Note 4.
Loans
As a result of entering into the Asset Exchange Agreement and in accordance with SFAS No. 65,
Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities, effective February 5, 2009 all of the
Companys loan assets are considered held for sale and valued at the lower of their cost or fair
value. As discussed in more detail in Note 5 below, the fair value of the Companys loan portfolio
was estimated based upon an internal analysis by management which
considered, among other factors,
information, to the extent available, about then current sale prices,
bids, credit quality, liquidity and other available
information for loans with similar characteristics as the Companys loan portfolio.
The amount by which the cost of the Companys loan assets exceeded the fair value at the date
the loans were reclassified as held for sale was recognized as a valuation allowance. Subsequent
changes to the valuation allowance will be included in the determination of net income in the
period in which the change occurs. Increases in the fair value of the loan assets will be
recognized only up to the cost of the loans on the date they were classified as held for sale.
Any
remaining discount relating to the purchase of the loans by the
Company is not amortized
as interest revenue during the period the loans are classified as held for sale. Deferred revenue
associated with loans held for sale is deferred until the related loan is sold.
7
Commercial mortgage loans constituted approximately 60.3% of the fair value of the Companys
total loan portfolio at March 31, 2009. Commercial mortgage loans are generally subject to greater
risks than other types of loans. The Companys commercial mortgage loans, like most commercial
mortgage loans, generally lack standardized terms, tend to have shorter maturities than other
mortgage loans and may not be fully amortizing.
A summary of the fair value of the Companys loans, which were considered held for sale as of
March 31, 2009, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
21,463
|
|
Multi-family residential
|
|
|
13,484
|
|
One-to-four family residential
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
35,564
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
35,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred loan fees
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of valuation
allowance of $15,181
|
|
$
|
35,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the balances of the Companys loans, which were considered held for investment as
of December 31, 2008, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
31,647
|
|
Multi-family residential
|
|
|
20,384
|
|
One-to-four family residential
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
53,012
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of discounts
|
|
|
53,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(915
|
)
|
Net deferred loan fees
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
52,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company reversed a $915,000 allowance for
loan losses and recorded a valuation allowance of $15,181,000 to reflect the reclassification of
the Companys loan portfolio as held for sale. Because the Companys loan portfolio is now recorded
at its fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 65, Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking
Activities and the determination of fair value includes, among
other factors, consideration of the
creditworthiness of borrowers, no allowance for loan losses existed at March 31, 2009, compared to
an allowance for loan losses of approximately $1.1 million at March 31, 2008 and $915,000 at
December 31, 2008.
8
Activity in the allowance for loan losses follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
915
|
|
|
$
|
1,180
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(915
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the Companys loan portfolio is now classified as held for sale and recorded at its fair
value in accordance with SFAS No. 65, Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities, there
was no nonaccretable discount at March 31, 2009. At March 31, 2008, there was a nonaccretable
discount of $155,000 related to two loans (neither of which were non-performing) with an aggregate
net investment balance of $202,000. No loans were acquired in 2009 or 2008.
The estimated fair value of non-performing loans totaled $2.0 million as of March 31,
2009. Non-performing loans, net of discount, totaled $492,000 as of March 31, 2008. The
increase in non-performing assets is due to the fact that 11 loans, representing 8
borrowers, were not performing as of March 31, 2009.
Note 5.
Fair Market Value of Loans Held for Sale
As a result of entering into the Asset Exchange Agreement and in accordance with SFAS No. 65,
Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities, effective February 5, 2009 the Companys loans
have been reclassified as held for sale and are currently recorded at the lower of cost or fair value in the
Balance Sheet. SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value and establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. SFAS No. 157
defines fair value as the price at which an asset or liability could be exchanged in a current transaction
between knowledgeable, willing parties. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices
or inputs or derived from such prices or inputs. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, other
valuation methodologies are applied. At March 31, 2009, the fair value of the Companys loan portfolio
was estimated based upon an internal analysis by management which considered, among other factors,
information, to the extent available, about then current sale prices, bids, credit quality, liquidity and other
available information for loans with similar characteristics as the Companys loan portfolio. The valuation
of the loan portfolio involves some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is
dependent on the terms of the loans and the availability of market prices and inputs.
SFAS No. 157 requires the categorization of financial assets and liabilities based on a hierarchy of the
inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level I) and the lowest priority to
valuation methods using unobservable inputs (Level III). The three levels are described below:
Level I Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities at the measurement date.
Level II Inputs are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or
liability through correlation with market data at the measurement date and for the
duration of the instruments anticipated life.
Level III Inputs reflect managements best estimate of what market participants would
use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given
to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to
the model.
The loans categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of
significant input to its valuation.
The categorization of the level of judgment in the fair value determination of the Companys
loans at March 31, 2009 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level I
|
|
Level II
|
|
Level III
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Loans Held for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,546
|
|
|
$
|
35,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,546
|
|
|
$
|
35,546
|
|
|
|
|
9
The table presented below summarizes the change in balance sheet carrying value associated
with Level III loans during the three months ended March 31, 2009. Caution should be utilized when
evaluating reported net revenues for Level III loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Payments,
|
|
Net
|
|
Gains
/ (Losses)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Purchases
|
|
Transfers
|
|
Included In Revenue
(1)
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
and Sales
|
|
In/(Out)
|
|
Realized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Held for Sale
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
50,727
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
($15,181
|
)
|
|
$
|
35,546
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
50,727
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
($15,181
|
)
|
|
$
|
35,546
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The current period gains/ (losses) from changes in values of Level III
loans represent gains/ (losses) from changes in values of those loans only for the
period(s) in which the loans were classified as Level III.
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This report contains certain statements that constitute forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as expects,
anticipates, believes, estimates and other similar expressions or future or conditional verbs
such as will, should, would, and could are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. These statements are not historical facts, but instead represent the Companys current
expectations, plans or forecasts of its future results, growth opportunities, business outlook,
loan growth, credit losses, liquidity position and other similar matters, including, but not
limited to, the ability to pay dividends with respect to the Series D preferred stock, the
consummation of the pending asset exchange, future bank regulatory actions that may impact the
Company and the effect of the bankruptcy of LBHI on the Company. These statements are not
guarantees of future results or performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and
assumptions that are difficult to predict and often are beyond the Companys control. Actual
outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the Companys
forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement
and should consider all uncertainties and risks, including, among other things, the risks set forth
herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as well as those
discussed in any of the Companys other subsequent Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no
obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events
that arise after the date the forward-looking statement was made.
Possible events or factors could cause results or performance to differ materially from what
is expressed in our forward-looking statements. These possible events or factors include, but are
not limited to, those risk factors discussed under Item 1A Risk Factors in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 or in Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,
and the following: limitations by regulatory authorities on the Companys ability to implement its
business plan and restrictions on its ability to pay dividends; further regulatory limitations on
the business of Aurora Bank that are applicable to the Company; negative economic conditions that
adversely affect the general economy, housing prices, the job market, consumer confidence and
spending habits which may affect, among other things, the credit quality of our loan portfolios
(the degree of the impact of which is dependent upon the duration and severity of these
conditions); the level and volatility of interest rates; changes in consumer, investor and
counterparty confidence in, and the related impact on, financial markets and institutions;
legislative and regulatory actions which may adversely affect the Companys business and economic
conditions as a whole; the impact of litigation and regulatory investigations; various monetary and
fiscal policies and regulations; changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations and the
impact on the Companys financial statements; inability to consummate the pending asset exchange;
and changes in the nature and quality of the types of loans held by the Company.
The following discussion of the Companys financial condition, results of operations, capital
resources and liquidity should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this report and the audited financial statements and related notes
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
10
Executive Level Overview
Aurora Bank owns all of the Companys common stock. The Companys Series B preferred stock and
Series D preferred stock remain outstanding and remain subject to their existing terms and
conditions, including the call feature with respect to the Series D preferred stock.
All of the mortgage assets in the Companys loan portfolio at March 31, 2009 were acquired
from Capital Crossing, previously the sole common stockholder, and it is anticipated that
substantially all additional mortgage assets, if any assets are acquired in the future, will be
acquired from Aurora Bank, currently the sole common stockholder. As of March 31, 2009, the Company
held loans acquired from Capital Crossing with an aggregate fair value of approximately $35.5
million.
Commercial mortgage loans constituted approximately 60.3% of the fair value of the Companys
total loan portfolio at March 31, 2009. Commercial mortgage loans are generally subject to greater
risks than other types of loans. The Companys commercial mortgage loans, like most commercial
mortgage loans, generally lack standardized terms, tend to have shorter maturities than other
mortgage loans and may not be fully amortizing. For these reasons, the Company may experience
higher rates of default on its mortgage loans than it would if its loan portfolio was more
diversified and included a greater number of owner-occupied residential or other mortgage loans. In
the event that the Exchange is consummated, the Companys loan portfolio will consist primarily of
loans secured by residential real estate.
Properties underlying the Companys current mortgage assets are also concentrated primarily in
California, New England and Nevada. As of March 31, 2009, approximately 62.7% of the fair value of
the Companys mortgage loans were secured by properties located in California, 7.0% in New England
and 5.3% in Nevada. Beginning in 2007, throughout 2008 and continuing into 2009, the housing and
real estate sectors in California and Nevada were hit particularly hard by the recession with
higher overall foreclosure rates than the national average. If these regions experience further
adverse economic, political or business conditions, or natural hazards, the Company will likely
experience higher rates of loss and delinquency on its mortgage loans than if its loans were more
geographically diverse.
Net income available to the common stockholder decreased approximately $15.1 million to a net
loss of approximately $14.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to net
income of $730,000 for the same period in 2008. The decrease in net income available to the common
stockholder is primarily the result of recording a non-cash unrealized valuation allowance of
approximately $15.1 million associated with recording the loan portfolio at fair value as a result
of the reclassification of the Companys loan portfolio to held for sale in connection with the
signing of the Asset Exchange Agreement, which was partially offset by a $915,000 reversal of the
allowance for loan losses as a result of this change. The decline in net income also was caused by
a decrease in interest income resulting from the discontinuance of the amortization of purchase
discount and fees on loans as a result of the loans being reclassified to held for sale during the
first quarter of 2009, combined with an increase in general and administrative expenses during the
quarter. Because the Companys loan portfolio is now recorded at its fair value in accordance with
SFAS No. 65, Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities, no allowance for loan losses was
recorded at March 31, 2009, compared to an allowance for loan losses of approximately $1.1 million
at March 31, 2008.
Decisions regarding the utilization of the Companys cash are based, in large part, on its
current and future commitments to pay preferred stock dividends and its ability to pay dividends on
its preferred stock and common stock in amounts necessary to continue to preserve its status as a
REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. Future decisions regarding mortgage asset acquisitions and
returns of capital will be based on the levels of the Companys cash and cash equivalents at the
time, the preferred stock dividends at the time and the required income necessary to generate
adequate dividend coverage in the future, the dividends on its preferred stock and common stock
necessary to continue to preserve the Companys status as a REIT and other factors determined to be
relevant at the time.
Impact of Economic Recession
The U.S. economy is currently in a recession. Dramatic declines in the housing market over the
past year, with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures, unemployment and underemployment,
have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage loans and resulted in significant
write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities as
well as major commercial and investment banks. Reflecting concern about the stability of the
financial markets generally and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and institutional
investors have reduced or ceased providing funding to borrowers, including to other financial
institutions. This market turmoil and tightening of credit have led to an increased level of
delinquencies, decreased consumer spending, lack of confidence, increased market volatility and
widespread reduction of business activity generally. The resulting economic pressure on borrowers,
and lack of confidence in the financial markets have negatively impacted, and may further
negatively impact, the credit quality of our commercial loan portfolio and may impact the credit
quality of our residential loan portfolio. The depth and breadth of the downturn as well as the
resulting impacts on the credit quality of both our commercial and residential loan portfolios
remain unclear. We expect, however, continued market turbulence and economic uncertainty to
continue well into 2009. This may result in further reductions in the fair value of the loans held
for sale in future periods.
11
Bankruptcy of LBHI
On September 15, 2008, LBHI filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Aurora Bank is a subsidiary of LBHI. Aurora Bank has not been placed into
bankruptcy, reorganization, conservatorship or receivership and the Company has not filed for
bankruptcy protection. We expect, however, that the bankruptcy of LBHI may limit the ability of
LBHI to contribute capital to Aurora Bank now or in the future. In addition, the timing and amount
of any payments received by Aurora Bank with respect to debts owned to Aurora Bank by LBHI may be
limited by the bankruptcy of LBHI, which could in turn negatively impact the assets, capital levels
and regulatory capital ratios of Aurora Bank. During the first quarter of 2009, the bankruptcy
court issued orders permitting LBHI to take certain actions intended to strengthen the capital
position of Aurora Bank, including: (1) the contribution of up to an aggregate of $30 million in
cash to Aurora Bank, (2) the transfer of ownership of certain servicing rights to a subsidiary of
Aurora Bank, (3) the waiver of the payment by Aurora Bank and its subsidiaries of certain servicing
fees to LBHI and (4) the termination of unfunded loan commitments of Aurora Bank and its
subsidiaries with specified borrowers. These actions, together with others taken by Aurora Bank,
resulted in Aurora Bank being adequately capitalized as of March 31, 2009 under applicable
regulatory guidelines according to a recent public filing by Aurora Bank with the OTS. The
classification of Aurora Banks capitalization level, however, is subject to review and acceptance
by the OTS. The Company is dependent in virtually every phase of its operations on the management
of Aurora Bank and as a subsidiary of Aurora Bank is subject to regulation by federal banking
authorities. The bankruptcy of LBHI and its potential negative effects on Aurora Bank has resulted
in increased oversight, and we expect will continue to result in increased oversight, of the
Company by the OTS and may result in further restrictions on the Companys ability to conduct its
business.
Abandoned Liquidation of the Company
On October 27, 2008, the Board of Directors unanimously approved, subject to obtaining the
approval of the OTS, the voluntary complete liquidation and dissolution of the Company. The
liquidation and dissolution was approved by Aurora Bank, in its capacity as the holder of all of
the outstanding common stock of the Company. In connection with the anticipated liquidation and
dissolution, the Board of Directors also approved the voluntarily delisting of the Series D
preferred stock from The NASDAQ Stock Market, which was expected to occur concurrently with the
consummation of the liquidation and dissolution.
On October 28, 2008, Aurora Bank made a formal request to the OTS for a letter of
non-objection with respect to the liquidation and dissolution of the Company. Following requests
for additional information by the OTS, a second formal non-objection request was submitted by
Aurora Bank on November 12, 2008. The OTS did not approve or grant a non-objection letter with
respect to the liquidation and dissolution of the Company. On November 26, 2008, however, the OTS
notified Aurora Bank that the outstanding Series D preferred stock of the Company would be afforded
Tier 1 capital treatment at Aurora Bank at a time while Aurora Banks capital levels were
continuing to decrease. Accordingly, given the refusal of the OTS to approve or grant a
non-objection letter with respect to the proposed liquidation and dissolution, the Board of
Directors approved the abandonment of the proposed liquidation and dissolution of the Company and
the delisting of the Series D preferred stock.
Asset Exchange
On February 5, 2009, the Company and Aurora Bank entered into an Asset Exchange Agreement
pursuant to which the Company agreed to transfer 207 loans secured primarily by commercial real
estate and multifamily residential real estate to Aurora Bank in exchange for 205 loans secured
primarily by residential real estate. The Loans represented substantially all of the Companys
assets, excluding cash and interest-bearing deposits, as of December 31, 2008. The Exchange is
subject to certain conditions to closing as well as the receipt of a non-objection letter from the
OTS. Aurora Bank has made a formal request to the OTS for a letter of non-objection with respect to
the Exchange, but it has not yet received the non-objection by the OTS in response to such request
and there can be no assurances that the OTS will provide this non-objection or that the conditions
to closing of the Exchange will be satisfied. If non-objection by the OTS is not received or the
conditions to closing are not satisfied, the Exchange will not be consummated. The Company
continues to consider potential alternative transactions during the pendency of the request for
non-objection by the OTS, however there can be no assurances that any such alternative transaction
will occur. As a result of entering into the Asset Exchange Agreement, the Company reclassified all
of its loan assets as held for sale and now records these loan assets at the lower of their cost or
fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 65, Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities.
Regulatory Actions Involving Aurora Bank
On January 26, 2009, the OTS entered a cease and desist order against Aurora Bank. The Order,
among other things, required Aurora Bank to file various privileged prospective operating plans
with the OTS to manage the liquidity and operations of Aurora Bank going forward, including a
strategic plan to be activated whenever Aurora Banks capital ratios are less than specified
levels. This strategic plan will remain
12
operative until the OTS confirms that the Order has been lifted based,
among other things, on Aurora Banks capital ratios. The Order requires Aurora Bank to ensure that
each of its subsidiaries, including the Company, complies with the Order, including the operating
restrictions contained in the Order. These operating restrictions, among other things, restrict
transactions with affiliates, contracts outside the ordinary course of business and changes in
senior executive officers, board members or their employment arrangements without prior written
notice to the OTS. In addition, on February 4, 2009, the OTS issued a prompt corrective action
directive to Aurora Bank. The PCA Directive requires Aurora Bank to, among other things, raise its
capital ratios such that it will be deemed to be adequately capitalized and places additional
constraints on Aurora Bank and its subsidiaries, including the Company. More detailed information
can be found in the Order and the PCA Directive themselves, which were entered against Aurora Bank
under its former name, Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, copies of which are available on the OTS
website.
The OTS has informed Aurora Bank that prior approval of the OTS is not required under the
Order or the PCA Directive for payment by the Company of dividends on the Series D preferred stock.
There can be no assurance, however, that future dividends on the Series D preferred stock will not
require prior approval of the OTS. There also can be no assurance that such approvals, if required,
will be received from the OTS or when or if Aurora Bank will achieve sufficient regulatory
capitalization levels to remove any such OTS approval requirement. Furthermore, any future
dividends on the Series D preferred stock will be payable only when, as and if declared by the
Board of Directors. The bankruptcy of LBHI and its potential negative effects on Aurora Bank has
resulted in increased oversight, and we expect will continue to result in increased oversight, of
the Company by the OTS and may result in further restrictions on the Companys ability to conduct
its business.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon
our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of
revenues and expenses in the reporting period. Our actual results may differ from these estimates.
We describe below those accounting policies that require material subjective or complex judgments
and that have the most significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Our
management evaluates these estimates on an ongoing basis, based upon information currently
available and on various assumptions management believes are reasonable as of the date on the front
cover of this report. Although a number of our significant accounting policies have changed since
all of the Companys loan assets are now considered held for sale and, as discussed further below,
valued at the lower of their cost or fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 65, Accounting for
Certain Mortgage Banking Activities, the remainder of the Companys significant accounting
policies summarized in Note 1 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 remain in effect.
Loans Held for Sale.
On February 5, 2009, the Company agreed to transfer 207 loans secured
primarily by commercial real estate and multifamily residential real estate to Aurora Bank in
exchange for 205 loans secured primarily by residential real estate. As a result, during the
quarter the Company reclassified all of its loan assets as held for sale and now records these loan
assets at the lower of their cost or fair value in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 65, Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities. Prior to
February 5, 2009, the Companys loan assets were recorded at historical cost less an allowance for
loan losses. The fair value of the Companys loan portfolio as of March 31, 2009 was estimated
based upon an internal analysis by management which considered, among
other factors, information, to
the extent available, about then current sale prices, bids, credit
quality, liquidity and other available information for
loans with similar characteristics as the Companys loan portfolio.
The amount by which the cost of the Companys loan assets exceeded the fair value at the date
the loans were reclassified as held for sale was recognized as a valuation allowance. Subsequent
changes to the valuation allowance will be included in the determination of net income in the
period in which the change occurs. Increases in the fair value of the loan assets will be
recognized only up to the cost of the loans on the date they were classified as held for sale.
Any remaining discount relating to the purchase of the loans by the Company are not amortized
as interest revenue during the period the loans are classified as held for sale. Deferred revenue
associated with loans held for sale is deferred until the related loan is sold.
Discounts on Acquired Loans.
Prior to entering into the Asset Exchange Agreement on February
5, 2009, in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) No. 03-3 Accounting for Certain Loans or
Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer, the Company reviewed acquired loans for differences
between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from the Companys initial
investment in the acquired loans to determine if those differences were attributable, at least in
part, to credit quality. If those differences were attributable to credit quality, the loans
contractually required payments receivable in excess of the amount of its cash flows expected at
acquisition, or nonaccretable discount, was not accreted into income. Prior to February 5, 2009,
SOP No. 03-3 required that the Company recognize the excess of all cash flows expected at
acquisition over the Companys initial investment in the loan as interest income using the interest
method over the term of the loan. This excess is referred to as accretable discount.
13
No loans acquired since the adoption of SOP No. 03-3 were within the scope of the SOP.
Loans which, at acquisition, do not have evidence of deterioration of credit quality since
origination are outside the scope of SOP No. 03-3. For such loans, the discount, representing the
excess of the amount of reasonably estimable and probable discounted future cash collections over
the purchase price, was accreted into interest income using the interest method over the term of
the loan. Prepayments were not considered in the calculation of accretion income. Additionally,
discount was not accreted on non-performing loans.
There was judgment involved in estimating the amount of the Companys future cash flows on
acquired loans. The amount and timing of actual cash flows could differ materially from
managements estimates. If cash flows cannot be reasonably estimated for any loan, and collection
was not probable, the cost recovery method of accounting was used. Under the cost recovery method,
any amounts received were applied against the recorded amount of the loan. Nonaccretable discount
was generally offset against the related principal balance when the amount at which a loan was
resolved or restructured was determined. There was no effect on the income statement as a result of
these reductions.
Subsequent to acquisition, if cash flow projections improve, and it was determined that the
amount and timing of the cash flows related to the nonaccretable discount were reasonably estimable
and collection was probable, the corresponding decrease in the nonaccretable discount was
transferred to the accretable discount and was accreted into interest income over the remaining
life of the loan on the interest method. If cash flow projections deteriorated subsequent to
acquisition, the decline was accounted for through a provision for loan losses included in
earnings.
Allowance for Loan Losses.
Prior to entering into the Asset Exchange Agreement on February 5,
2009 and reclassifying the loans as held for sale, the Company maintained an allowance for probable
loan losses that were inherent in its loan portfolio. Since the loan portfolio is now classified as
held for sale and recorded at the lower of its cost or fair value, the Company will no longer
maintain an allowance for loan losses. In prior periods, arriving at an appropriate level of
allowance for loan losses required a high degree of judgment. The allowance for loan losses was
increased or decreased through a provision for loan losses.
In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management made significant
judgments. Aurora Bank initially reviewed the Companys loan portfolio to identify loans for which
specific allocations were considered prudent. Specific allocations included the results of
measuring impaired loans under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 114
Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. Next, management considered the level of loan
allowances deemed appropriate for loans determined not to be impaired under SFAS No. 114. The
allowance for these loans was determined by a formula whereby the portfolio was stratified by type
and internal risk rating categories. Loss factors were then applied to each strata based on various
considerations including collateral type, loss experience, delinquency trends, current economic
conditions and industry standards. The allowance for loan losses was managements estimate of the
probable loan losses incurred as of the balance sheet date.
The determination of the allowance for loan losses required managements use of significant
estimates and judgments. In making this determination, management considered known information
relative to specific loans, as well as collateral type, loss experience, delinquency trends,
current economic conditions and industry trends, generally. Based on these factors, management
estimated the probable loan losses incurred as of the reporting date and increased or decreased the
allowance through a change in the provision for loan losses. Loan losses were charged against the
allowance when management believed the net investment of the loan, or a portion thereof, was
uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, were credited to the allowance when cash payments
were received.
Gains and losses on sales of loans were determined using the specific identification method.
The excess (deficiency) of any cash received as compared to the net investment was recorded as gain
(loss) on sales of loans. There were no loans sold during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
14
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
Interest income
The following table sets forth the yields on the Companys interest-earning assets for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Loans, net (1)
|
|
$
|
48,847
|
|
|
$
|
829
|
|
|
|
6.88
|
%
|
|
$
|
64,730
|
|
|
$
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
8.05
|
%
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
44,398
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
52,146
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
1.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
93,245
|
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
%
|
|
$
|
116,876
|
|
|
$
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For purposes of providing a meaningful yield comparison, the forgoing table reflects the
average cost of the loans, net of discounts, and not the fair value of the loan portfolio.
Non-performing loans are excluded from average balance calculations.
|
The decline in interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2008 is primarily due to a decrease in the average balance of loans and
interest-bearing deposits and a decrease in the yield on loans.
The average cost of the loans, net of discounts, for the three months ended March 31, 2009
totaled $48.8 million compared to $64.7 million for the same period in 2008. This decrease is
primarily attributable to loan payoffs and amortization. No loans have been acquired by the Company
since 2005 and management currently has no intention of acquiring additional loans other than in
connection with the potential asset exchange (or alternative transaction). For the three months
ended March 31, 2009, the yield on the loan portfolio decreased to 6.88% compared to 8.05% for the
same period in 2008. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, interest and fee income recognized
on loan payoffs decreased $13,000, or 12.6%, to $90,000 from $103,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2008. The level of interest and fee income recognized on loan payoffs varies for numerous
reasons, as further discussed below. The yield from regularly scheduled interest and accretion
income decreased to 6.13% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 7.41% for the same period
in 2008 primarily as a result of decreases in market interest rates as well as the payoff or
paydown of a number of fixed high-rate loans during the first quarter of 2009.
The average balance of interest-bearing deposits decreased $7.7 million or 14.9% to $44.4
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $52.1 million for the same period in
2008. The changes in the average balances of interest-bearing deposits are the result of periodic
dividend payments partially offset by cash inflows from loan repayments. The interest rate on
interest-bearing deposits remained static for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to
the same period in 2008.
The table above presents the average cost balance of the Companys loans, net of discounts,
and does not present the loans at their fair value. Therefore, income on loans includes the
portion of the purchase discount that is accreted into income over the remaining lives of the
related loans using the interest method. Because the carrying value of the loan portfolio is net of
purchase discount, the related yield on this portfolio generally is higher than the aggregate
contractual rate paid on the loans. The total yield includes the excess of a loans expected
discounted future cash flows over its net investment, recognized using the interest method.
When a loan is paid off, the excess of any cash received over the net investment is recorded
as interest income. In addition to the amount of purchase discount that is recognized at that time,
income may also include interest owed by the borrower prior to Capital Crossings acquisition of
the loan, interest collected if on non-performing status, prepayment fees and other loan fees
(other interest and fee income). The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
components of interest and fees on loans. There can be no assurance regarding future interest
income, including the yields and related level of such income, or the relative portion attributable
to loan payoffs as compared to other sources.
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Regularly scheduled interest and accretion income
|
|
$
|
739
|
|
|
|
6.13
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
7.41
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fee income recognized on loan payoffs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretable discount
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
Other interest and fee income
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
829
|
|
|
|
6.88
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
8.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of loan payoffs and related discount income is influenced by several factors,
including the interest rate environment, the real estate market in particular areas, the timing of
transactions, and circumstances related to individual borrowers and loans. The amount of individual
loan payoffs is often times a result of negotiations between the Company and the borrower. Based
upon credit risk analysis and other factors, the Company will, in certain instances, accept less
than the full amount contractually due in accordance with the loan terms.
Provision
for
loan
losses
Prior to entering into the Asset Exchange Agreement on February 5, 2009 and reclassifying the
loans as held for sale, the Company maintained an allowance for probable loan losses that were
inherent in its loan portfolio. Since the loan portfolio is now classified as held for sale and
recorded at the lower of its cost or fair value, the Company will no longer maintain an allowance
for loan losses as the determination of fair value includes consideration of, among other factors,
the creditworthiness of borrowers. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company
recorded a $915,000 reversal of the allowance for loan losses and recorded a valuation allowance of
$15,181,000 to reflect the change to record the Companys loan portfolio at fair value. Prior to
the reclassification of the loan portfolio, the determination of the allowance for loan losses
required managements use of significant estimates and judgments. In making this determination,
management considered known information relative to specific loans, as well as collateral type,
loss experience, delinquency trends, current economic conditions and industry trends, generally.
Based on these factors, management estimated the probable loan losses incurred as of the reporting
date and increased or decreased the allowance through a change in the provision for loan losses.
The Company recorded a reduction of the allowance for loan losses of $115,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 due to the decrease in the balance of loans due to payoffs without a
significant change in the credit profile of the remaining portfolio during the period.
Operating
expenses
Loan servicing and advisory expenses decreased $4,000, or 8.3%, to $44,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 from $48,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 primarily as a
result of the decrease in the average balance of the loan portfolio.
Other general and administrative expenses increased $243,000, or 565.1%, to $286,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 from $43,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 primarily
as a result of the increase in legal expenses related to the Exchange and SEC reporting matters.
Management believes that these legal expenses resulted in a one-time increase in general and
administrative expenses and do not represent a trend.
Preferred
stock
dividends
Preferred stock dividends remained the same for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared
to the same period in 2008. The Company, subject to directives of the OTS, intends to pay dividends
on its preferred stock and common stock in amounts necessary to continue to preserve its status as
a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. The OTS has informed Aurora Bank that prior approval of the
OTS is not required under the Order or the PCA Directive for payment by the Company of dividends on
the Series D preferred stock. There can be no assurance, however, that future dividends on the
Series D preferred stock will not require prior approval of the OTS. There also can be no assurance
that such approvals, if required, will be received from the OTS or when or if Aurora Bank will
achieve sufficient regulatory capitalization levels to remove any such OTS approval requirement.
Furthermore, any future dividends on the Series D preferred stock will be payable only when, as and
if declared by the Board of Directors.
16
Changes in Financial Condition
Interest-bearing
deposits
with
parent
Interest-bearing deposits with parent consist entirely of money market accounts with Aurora
Bank. The balance of interest-bearing deposits increased $2.4 million to $45.9 million at March 31,
2009 compared to $43.5 million at December 31, 2008. The increase in the balance of
interest-bearing deposits is primarily a result of cash flows from loan repayments.
Loan
portfolio
A summary of the fair value of the Companys loans, which were considered held for sale as of
March 31, 2009, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
21,463
|
|
Multi-family residential
|
|
|
13,484
|
|
One-to-four family residential
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
35,564
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
35,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred loan fees
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of valuation allowance
of $15,181
|
|
$
|
35,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the balances of the Companys loans, which were considered held for investment as
of December 31, 2008, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
31,647
|
|
Multi-family residential
|
|
|
20,384
|
|
One-to-four family residential
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
53,012
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of discounts
|
|
|
53,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(915
|
)
|
Net deferred loan fees
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
52,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in the total amount of loans is primarily attributable the reclassification of
the Companys loans to held for sale in connection with entering into the Asset Exchange Agreement
and the related valuation allowance recorded to reflect the loans at the lower of their cost or
fair value. The Company has historically acquired primarily performing commercial real estate and
multifamily residential mortgage loans. During the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2008, the Company did not acquire any loans from Aurora Bank.
17
The Company intends that each loan acquired from Aurora Bank in the future, if any are
acquired in the future, will be a whole loan, and will be originated or acquired by Aurora Bank in
the ordinary course of its business. The Company also intends that all loans held by it will be
serviced pursuant to its master service agreement with Aurora Bank.
The estimated fair value of non-performing loans totaled $2.0 million as of March 31, 2009.
Non-performing loans, net of discount, totaled $492,000 as of March 31, 2008. The increase in
non-performing assets is due to the fact that 11 loans, representing 8 borrowers, were not
performing as of March 31, 2009. Loans generally are placed on non-performing status and the
accrual of interest is generally discontinued when the collectability of principal and interest is
not probable or estimable. Unpaid interest income previously accrued on such loans is reversed
against current period interest income. A loan is returned to accrual status when it is brought
current in accordance with managements anticipated cash flows at the time of acquisition and collection
of future principal and interest is probable and estimable.
Allowance
for
Loan
Losses
Prior to entering into the Asset Exchange Agreement on February 5, 2009 and reclassifying the
loans as held for sale, the Company maintained an allowance for probable loan losses that were
inherent in its loan portfolio. Since the loan portfolio is now classified as held for sale and
recorded at the lower of its cost or fair value, the Company will no longer maintain an allowance
for loan losses as the determination of fair value includes consideration of, among other factors,
the creditworthiness of borrowers. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company
recorded a $915,000 reversal of the allowance for loan losses and recorded a valuation allowance of
$15,181,000 to reflect the change to record the Companys loan portfolio at fair value. Prior to
the reclassification of the loan portfolio, the determination of the allowance for loan losses
required managements use of significant estimates and judgments. In making this determination,
management considered known information relative to specific loans, as well as collateral type,
loss experience, delinquency trends, current economic conditions and industry trends, generally.
Based on these factors, management estimated the probable loan losses incurred as of the reporting
date and increased or decreased the allowance through a change in the provision for loan losses.
The following table sets forth certain information relating to the activity in the allowance
for loan losses for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
915
|
|
|
$
|
1,180
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(915
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in the allowance for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was attributable to
the decrease in the balance of loans due to payoffs without a significant change in the credit
profile of the remaining portfolio during the period.
Interest Rate Risk
The Companys income consists primarily of interest income. If there is a decline in market
interest rates, the Company may experience a reduction in interest income and a corresponding
decrease in funds available to be distributed to its stockholders. The reduction in interest income
may result from downward adjustments of the indices upon which the interest rates on floating-rate
loans and interest-bearing deposits are based and from prepayments of mortgage loans with fixed
interest rates, resulting in reinvestment of the proceeds in lower yielding assets. The Company
does not intend to use any derivative products to manage its interest rate risk. The majority of
the Companys loan portfolio consists of fixed rate loans with contractual interest rates that are
not affected by changes in market interest rates. Approximately 27% of the Companys loan
portfolio, however, is comprised of floating-rate loans with contractual interest rates that may
fluctuate based on changes in market interest rates. In addition, negative fluctuations in interest
rates could reduce the amount of interest paid on interest-bearing cash deposits of the Company,
which could negatively impact the amount of cash available to pay dividends on the Series D
preferred stock. The Company is not able to precisely quantify the potential impact on its
operating results or funds available for distribution to stockholders from material changes in
interest rates.
18
Significant Concentration of Credit Risk
Concentration of credit risk generally arises with respect to the Companys loan portfolio
when a number of borrowers engage in similar business activities, or activities in the same
geographical region. Concentration of credit risk indicates the relative sensitivity of Companys
performance to both positive and negative developments affecting a particular industry or
geographic region. The Companys balance sheet exposure to geographic concentrations directly
affects the credit risk of the loans within its loan portfolio.
At March 31, 2009, 62.7%, 7.0% and 5.3% of the fair value of the Companys real estate loan
portfolio consisted of loans in California, New England and Nevada respectively. At December 31,
2008, 64.5%, 7.4% and 5.1% of the Companys net real estate loan portfolio consisted of loans
located in California, New England and Nevada, respectively. Consequently, the portfolio may
experience a higher default rate in the event of adverse economic, political or business
developments or natural hazards in California, New England or Nevada that may affect the ability of
property owners to make payments of principal and interest on the underlying mortgages. Beginning
in 2007, throughout 2008 and continuing into 2009, the housing and real estate sectors in
California and Nevada were hit particularly hard by the recession with higher overall foreclosure
rates than the national average. If these regions experience further adverse economic, political or
business conditions, or natural hazards, the Company will likely experience higher rates of loss
and delinquency on its mortgage loans than if its loans were more geographically diverse.
Liquidity Risk Management
The objective of liquidity management is to ensure the availability of sufficient cash flows
to meet all of the Companys financial commitments. In managing liquidity risk, the Company takes
into account various legal limitations placed on a REIT. The Companys principal liquidity need is
to pay dividends on its preferred shares and common shares.
If and to the extent that any additional assets are acquired in the future, such acquisitions
are intended to be funded primarily with available cash balances or through repayment of principal
balances of mortgage assets by individual borrowers. The Company does not have and does not
anticipate having any material capital expenditures. To the extent that the Board of Directors
determines that additional funding is required, the Company may raise such funds through additional
equity offerings, debt financing or retention of cash flow (after consideration of provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code requiring the distribution by a REIT of at least 90% of its REIT taxable
income and taking into account taxes that would be imposed on undistributed income), or a
combination of these methods. The Company does not currently intend to incur any indebtedness. The
organizational documents of the Company limit the amount of indebtedness which it is permitted to
incur without the approval of the Series D preferred stockholders to no more than 100% of the total
stockholders equity of the Company. Any such debt may include intercompany advances made by Aurora
Bank to the Company.
The Company may also issue additional series of preferred stock, subject to OTS approval.
However, the Company may not issue additional shares of preferred stock ranking senior to the
Series D preferred shares without the consent of holders of at least two-thirds of the Series D
preferred shares, each voting as a separate class, outstanding at that time. Although the Companys
charter does not prohibit or otherwise restrict Aurora Bank or its affiliates from holding and
voting shares of Series D preferred stock, to the Companys knowledge the amount of shares of
Series D preferred stock held by Aurora Bank or its affiliates is insignificant (less than 1%).
Additional shares of preferred stock ranking on a parity with the Series D preferred shares may not
be issued without the approval of a majority of the Companys independent directors.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The Companys asset and liability structure is substantially different from that of an
industrial company in that virtually all of the Companys assets are monetary in nature. Management
believes the impact of inflation on financial results depends upon the Companys ability to react
to changes in interest rates and by such reaction, reduce the inflationary impact on performance.
Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction, or at the same magnitude, as the
prices of other goods and services.
Various information disclosed elsewhere in this quarterly report will assist the reader in
understanding how the Company is positioned to react to changing interest rates and inflationary
trends. In particular, the discussion of market risk and other maturity and repricing information
of the Companys assets is contained in Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk below.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates.
Currently, approximately 27% of the Companys loan portfolio is comprised of floating-rate loans
with contractual interest rates that may fluctuate based on changes in market interest rates. In
addition, negative fluctuations in interest rates could reduce the amount of interest paid on
interest-bearing cash deposits
19
of the Company. The Companys market risk arises primarily from
interest rate risk inherent in holding loans. To that end, Aurora Bank actively monitors the
interest rate risk exposure of the Company pursuant to an advisory agreement.
Aurora Bank reviews, among other things, the sensitivity of the Companys assets to interest
rate changes, the book and market values of assets, purchase and sale activity, and anticipated
loan payoffs. Aurora Banks senior management also approves and establishes pricing and funding
decisions with respect to the Companys overall asset and liability composition.
The Companys methods for evaluating interest rate risk include an analysis of its
interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within a given time period. Since the Company has no
interest-bearing liabilities, a period of rising interest rates would tend to result in an increase
in net interest income. A period of falling interest rates would tend to adversely affect net
interest income.
The following table sets forth the Companys interest-rate-sensitive assets categorized by
repricing dates and weighted average yields at March 31, 2009. For fixed rate instruments, the
repricing date is the maturity date. For adjustable-rate instruments, the repricing date is deemed
to be the earliest possible interest rate adjustment date. Assets that are subject to immediate
repricing are placed in the overnight column.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
Over One
|
|
|
Over Two
|
|
|
Over Three
|
|
|
Over Four
|
|
|
Over
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
to Two
|
|
|
to Three
|
|
|
to Four
|
|
|
to Five
|
|
|
Five
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Overnight
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
45,935
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,935
|
|
|
$
|
45,935
|
|
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate loans (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,175
|
|
|
|
7,634
|
|
|
|
6,090
|
|
|
|
3,589
|
|
|
|
2,709
|
|
|
|
5,691
|
|
|
|
34,888
|
|
|
|
25,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.03
|
%
|
|
|
7.10
|
%
|
|
|
6.84
|
%
|
|
|
6.48
|
%
|
|
|
6.35
|
%
|
|
|
6.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustable-rate loans (1)
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
10,327
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
13,092
|
|
|
|
7,993
|
|
|
|
|
8.04
|
%
|
|
|
5.54
|
%
|
|
|
6.32
|
%
|
|
|
6.33
|
%
|
|
|
6.21
|
%
|
|
|
6.14
|
%
|
|
|
5.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rate-sensitive assets
|
|
$
|
46,671
|
|
|
$
|
19,502
|
|
|
$
|
8,294
|
|
|
$
|
6,622
|
|
|
$
|
3,977
|
|
|
$
|
2,983
|
|
|
$
|
5,866
|
|
|
$
|
93,915
|
|
|
$
|
79,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Loans are presented at net amounts and exclude non-performing loans.
|
Based on the Companys experience, management applies the assumption that, on average,
approximately 12% of the outstanding fixed and adjustable-rate loans will prepay annually.
The Companys loan portfolio is subject to general market risk, including, without limitation,
negative economic conditions that adversely affect the general economy, housing prices, the job
market, consumer confidence and spending habits which may affect, among other things, the credit
quality of our loan portfolios (the degree of the impact of which is dependent upon the duration
and severity of these conditions); the level and volatility of interest rates; changes in consumer,
investor and counterparty confidence in, and the related impact on, financial markets and
institutions; and various monetary and fiscal policies and regulations. The fair value of the
Companys loan portfolio and the amount of the Companys loans that are non-performing may be
negatively affected by these factors.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of its President and Chief Financial Officer,
evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), as of March 31, 2009. Based on this evaluation, the Companys President and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2009, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
(1) designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to the
President and Chief Financial Officer by others within the entity, particularly during the period
in which this report was being prepared, and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
No change to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
20
PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, the Company may be involved in routine litigation incidental to its
business, including a variety of legal proceedings with borrowers, which would contribute to the
Companys expenses, including the costs of carrying non-performing assets.
In addition, the Company has received letters from two holders of the Series D preferred stock
threatening litigation in connection with the abandoning of the liquidation of the Company and the
approval of the Exchange. One of these holders brought suit against the Company in the Superior
Court of Massachusetts to compel the Company to produce certain books and records for the benefit
of the stockholder and to reimburse the stockholder for related attorneys fees. The Company
believes that it has supplied the stockholder with all records required under Massachusetts law and
intends to vigorously defend itself in this proceeding.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
A number of risk factors, including, without limitation, the risks factor set forth below and
the risk factors found in Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period
ended December 31, 2008, may cause the Companys actual results to differ materially from
anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied in any forward-looking
statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or any other report filed by the Company
with the SEC. All of these factors should be carefully reviewed, and the reader of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q should be aware that there may be other factors that could cause difference in
future results, performance or achievements.
If the Company is unable to consummate the Exchange or an alternative transaction, the Companys
results of operations could be negatively affected.
On February 5, 2009, the Company and Aurora Bank entered into an Asset Exchange Agreement
pursuant to which the Company agreed to transfer 207 loans secured primarily by commercial real
estate and multifamily residential real estate to Aurora Bank in exchange for 205 loans secured
primarily by residential real estate. The Exchange is subject to certain conditions to closing as
well as the receipt of a non-objection letter from the OTS. Aurora Bank has made a formal request
to the OTS for a letter of non-objection with respect to the Exchange, but it has not yet received
the non-objection by the OTS in response to such request and there can be no assurances that the
OTS will provide this non-objection or that the conditions to closing of the Exchange will be
satisfied. If non-objection by the OTS is not received or the conditions to closing are not
satisfied, the Exchange will not be consummated. As a result of entering into the Asset Exchange
Agreement, the Company now carries all of its loan assets at the lower of their cost or fair value
and recorded a non-cash unrealized valuation allowance of approximately $15.1 million associated
with the reclassification of the Companys loan portfolio to held for sale. To the extent that the
fair value of the loan assets decreases before the consummation of the Exchange or an alternative
transaction, the Company may have to record an additional non-cash unrealized valuation allowance
as a result of any further decline, which could negatively affect the Companys results of
operations.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, one matter was submitted for approval to Aurora
Bank, the sole common stockholder of the Company. The Exchange was submitted to, and approved by,
Aurora Bank, the sole common stockholder of the Company on January 30, 2009. No matters were
submitted to a vote of the holders of the Series D preferred stock during this period.
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Asset Exchange Agreement between the Company and Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB (currently known as
Aurora Bank FSB), dated February 5, 2009, incorporated by reference from the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the President.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of the President and Chief Financial Officer.
|
21
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Capital Crossing
Preferred Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
CAPITAL CROSSING PREFERRED CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 20, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Lana Franks
|
|
|
|
Lana Franks
|
|
|
|
President (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 20, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Thomas OSullivan
|
|
|
|
Thomas OSullivan
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
22
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
Exhibit
|
|
Item
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Asset Exchange Agreement between the Company and Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB (currently
known as Aurora Bank FSB), dated February 5, 2009, incorporated by reference from the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the President.
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Chief
Financial Officer.
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of the President and Chief Financial
Officer.
|
|
|
26
|
|
23
Capital Crossing Preferred (MM) (NASDAQ:CCPCN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Capital Crossing Preferred (MM) (NASDAQ:CCPCN)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024