UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended August 31, 2008
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________ to ___________
Commission File Number 000-50643
GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada 86-0933274
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
1600 N Desert Drive, Suite 301, Tempe, AZ 85281
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(480) 994-0772
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
|
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller
reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.): Yes [ ] No [X]
At September 30, 2008, 6,625,114 shares of Global Entertainment Corporation
common stock were outstanding.
GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
INDEX
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED AUGUST 31, 2008
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements 3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - As of August 31, 2008
(Unaudited) and May 31, 2008 3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) -
Three Months Ended August 31, 2008 and 2007 4
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders'
Equity - Year Ended May 31, 2008 and Three Months Ended
August 31, 2008 (Unaudited) 5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) -
Three Months Ended August 31, 2008 and 2007 6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations 17
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 22
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures 22
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 23
Item 1A. Risk Factors 24
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 24
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities 24
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 24
Item 5. Other Information 24
Item 6. Exhibits 24
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF AUGUST 31, 2008 (UNAUDITED) AND MAY 31, 2008
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
August 31, May 31,
2008 2008
-------- --------
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 563 $ 443
Restricted cash 1,250 --
Accounts receivable, net of $2 allowance
August 31, 2008 and May 31, 2008 1,197 1,111
Prepaid expenses and other assets 299 239
Investment in Wenatchee project 47,209 34,473
Assets to be disposed -- 2,167
-------- --------
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 50,518 38,433
Property and equipment, net 229 266
Goodwill 519 519
Deferred income tax asset 112 --
Other assets 265 108
Minority interests 46 38
-------- --------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 51,689 $ 39,364
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable $ 7,281 $ 7,718
Accrued liabilities 990 750
Deferred revenues 527 24
Notes payable - current portion 39,651 27,220
Liabilities related to assets to be disposed -- 233
-------- --------
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 48,449 35,945
Deferred income tax liability 117 117
Notes payable - long-term portion 153 180
-------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES 48,719 36,242
-------- --------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock - $.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued or outstanding -- --
Common stock - $.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized;
6,625,114 shares issued and outstanding as of August 31, 2008
and May 31, 2008 7 7
Paid-in capital 10,938 10,930
Accumulated deficit (7,975) (7,815)
-------- --------
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 2,970 3,122
-------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 51,689 $ 39,364
======== ========
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2008 AND 2007
(UNAUDITED) (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
Three Months Ended August 31,
-------------------------------
2008 2007
---------- ----------
REVENUES:
Project management fees $ 465 $ 125
Facility management fees 445 964
License fees 375 917
Ticket service fees 620 779
Project development fees 209 181
Advertising sales commissions 245 255
Other revenue -- 3
---------- ----------
TOTAL REVENUES 2,359 3,224
---------- ----------
OPERATING COSTS:
Cost of revenues 979 1,700
General and administrative costs 1,496 3,013
---------- ----------
TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 2,475 4,713
---------- ----------
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS (116) (1,489)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest income 3 45
Interest expense (7) (8)
Minority interests 8 2
---------- ----------
TOTAL OTHER INCOME 4 39
---------- ----------
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES (112) (1,450)
INCOME TAX BENEFIT -- --
---------- ----------
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS (112) (1,450)
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF INCOME TAXES (48) (68)
---------- ----------
NET LOSS $ (160) $ (1,518)
========== ==========
LOSS PER SHARE:
Basic -
Loss from continuing operations $ (0.02) $ (0.22)
Loss from discontinued operations -- (0.01)
---------- ----------
Net loss $ (0.02) $ (0.23)
========== ==========
Diluted -
Loss from continuing operations $ (0.02) $ (0.22)
Loss from discontinued operations -- (0.01)
---------- ----------
Net loss $ (0.02) $ (0.23)
========== ==========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic 6,625,114 6,508,700
========== ==========
Diluted 6,625,114 6,508,700
========== ==========
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2008 AND THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2008 (UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
Common Stock
------------------- Paid-in Accumulated
Shares Amount Capital Deficit Total
------ ------ ------- ------- -----
BALANCE AT MAY 31, 2007 6,508,173 $ 7 $ 10,731 $ (3,784) $ 6,954
Exercise of options 13,941 -- -- -- --
Issuance of restricted stock 3,000 -- 36 -- 36
Issuance of stock 100,000 -- 163 -- 163
Net loss for the fiscal year
ended May 31, 2008 -- -- -- (4,031) (4,031)
--------- ------ --------- --------- ---------
BALANCE AT MAY 31, 2008 6,625,114 7 10,930 (7,815) 3,122
Issuance of restricted stock -- -- 8 -- 8
Net loss for the three months
ended August 31, 2008 -- -- -- (160) (160)
--------- ------ --------- --------- ---------
BALANCE AT AUGUST 31, 2008 6,625,114 $ 7 $ 10,938 $ (7,975) $ 2,970
========= ====== ========= ========= =========
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2008 AND 2007
(UNAUDITED) (IN THOUSANDS)
Three Months Ended August 31,
-----------------------------
2008 2007
-------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss $ (160) $ (1,518)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities -
Depreciation 34 38
Unbilled earnings on Wenatchee project (174) --
Other non-cash items 8 --
Discontinued operations and related impairment charges 5 (34)
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of businesses
acquired and disposed -
Accounts receivable (64) 1,643
Prepaid expenses and other assets (217) (96)
Accounts payable (443) (1,115)
Accrued liabilities 240 196
Deferred revenues 503 429
-------- --------
Net cash used in operating activities (268) (457)
-------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment -- (37)
Investment in Wenatchee project (12,556) (7,541)
Proceeds from disposition of Cragar, net of expenses 1,790 --
-------- --------
Net cash used in investing activites (10,766) (7,578)
-------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Notes payable proceeds 12,679 6,549
Notes payable payments (275) --
Deposit of restricted cash (1,250) --
-------- --------
Net cash provided by financing activities 11,154 6,549
-------- --------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 120 (1,486)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD 443 4,252
-------- --------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD $ 563 $ 2,766
======== ========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
Interest paid $ 7 $ 8
======== ========
Income taxes paid (received) $ -- $ --
======== ========
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND USE OF ESTIMATES
DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY
Global Entertainment Corporation (referred to in this report as "we," "us,"
"Global,", "Company" or "GEC") is an integrated event and entertainment company
that is engaged, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, in sports management,
multipurpose events center and related real estate development, facility and
venue management and marketing, and venue ticketing. We are primarily focused on
projects located in mid-size communities in the United States.
Our current operating subsidiaries are Western Professional Hockey League, Inc.,
Global Properties I, International Coliseums Company, Inc., Global Entertainment
Marketing Systems, Inc., Global Entertainment Ticketing, and Encore Facility
Management.
We, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Western Professional Hockey League,
Inc., are the operator of the Western Professional Hockey League (WPHL), a minor
league professional hockey organization, and are the licensor of the
independently owned hockey teams which participate in the league. WPHL has
entered into a joint operating agreement with the Central Hockey League, Inc.
(CHL Inc.). The effect of the joint operating agreement is that the two leagues
had their respective teams join together and operate under the Central Hockey
League name (as the League). The terms of the joint operating agreement define
how the League will operate.
The League is a structured licensed sports league, which includes competing
teams located in various states, including Texas, Colorado, Kansas, Louisiana,
Mississippi, South Dakota, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Arizona. There are 17 teams
in the 2008-09 season and there were 17 teams in the 2007-08 season. In each
season 13 teams were licensed by WPHL. In each season, 4 teams, each of which
was an original CHL, Inc. team, continue to operate under a sanction agreement
that requires direct payments to the League pursuant to the terms and conditions
of the original CHL, Inc. agreements.
Global Properties I (GPI) provides services in targeted mid-sized communities
across the United States related to the development of multipurpose events
centers and surrounding multi-use real estate development.
GPI, along with International Coliseums Company, Inc. (ICC), develops
multipurpose events centers in mid-market communities. ICC's development of
multipurpose events centers promotes the development of the League by assisting
potential licensees in securing quality venues in which to play minor
professional hockey league games. The inter-relationship between GPI, ICC and
WPHL is a key factor in the viability of a managed multipurpose entertainment
facility.
Global Entertainment Marketing Systems, Inc. (GEMS), promotes, markets, and
sells various services related to multipurpose entertainment facilities,
including all contractually obligated income (COI) sources such as facility
naming rights, luxury suite sales, club seat license sales, and facility
sponsorship agreements.
Global Entertainment Ticketing (GetTix) provides ticketing services for the
multipurpose event centers developed by GPI and ICC, existing League licensees,
and various other entertainment venues, theaters, concert halls, and other
facilities and event coordinators. GetTix provides a full ticketing solution by
way of box office, phone, internet and print-at-home service that utilizes
distribution outlets in each market. GetTix uses third-party, state-of-the-art
software to deliver ticketing capabilities that include database flexibility,
easy season and group options, financial reporting and marketing resources.
7
Encore Facility Management (Encore) provides a full complement of multipurpose
events center operational services. These services provide administrative
oversight in the areas of facility/property management and finance, event
bookings, and food and beverage. Encore is currently involved with facility
management of multipurpose events centers developed by GPI and ICC. Facility
management operations are conducted under separate limited liability companies.
On August 1, 2008, we closed a transaction pursuant to which we sold
substantially all of the assets of our subsidiary Cragar Industries, Inc.
(Cragar), a licensor of an automotive aftermarket wheel trademark and brand -
CRAGAR(R). The assets consisted primarily of intangible property, including
trademarks, service marks and domain names. The purchase price was approximately
$1.9 million in cash. Of the cash proceeds, $0.1 million was used for
transaction-related costs and $1.25 million has been set aside in a restricted
account as security for a letter of credit. The remainder of the funds was made
available for working capital and general corporate purposes.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Global
Entertainment Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries, WPHL, GPI, ICC,
GEMS, Encore, GetTix and Cragar, as well as the limited liability companies
formed for facility management. Intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they
do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for fair presentation have been included.
Operating results for the three month period ended August 31, 2008, are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
May 31, 2009, or for any other period.
For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes
included in our report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2008.
Certain reclassifications are reflected in prior periods for the purpose of
consistent presentation.
USE OF ESTIMATES
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the
reported revenues and expenses. Actual results may vary from the estimates that
were assumed in preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Significant accounting policies are described in the audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in our Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended May 31, 2008. We believe our critical accounting policies and
material estimates include, but are not limited to, revenue recognition, the
allowance for doubtful accounts, arena guarantees, the carrying value of
goodwill, the realization of deferred income tax assets, the fair value of
liability related to the secondary guarantee related to a worker's compensation
program, and the allocation of expenses, division of profit or loss relating to
the joint operating agreement, and the application of the
percentage-of-completion method. Due to the uncertainties inherent in the
estimation process and the significance of these items, it is at least
reasonably possible that the estimates in connection with these items could be
materially revised within the next year.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN No. 48), "An
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109," which clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company's financial statements in
accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". This
8
interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. It reflects the benefit recognition
approach, where a tax benefit is recognized when it is more likely than not to
be sustained based on the technical merits of the position. We adopted the
interpretation on June 1, 2007, and there was no impact on our financial
position or results of operations. We have not been examined by any major tax
jurisdictions.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements". The
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. We adopted this statement prospectively effective
June 1, 2008, and there was no impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities". This statement permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. An entity shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the
fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting
date. We adopted this statement prospectively effective June 1, 2008 and there
was no impact on our financial position or results of operations. We have not
elected the fair value option for any eligible items.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51". This statement
establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The statement also
provides consolidated income statement presentation guidance and requires
expanded disclosures. This statement is effective for our fiscal year beginning
June 1, 2009, and interim periods within that year. The statement will be
applied prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements,
which will be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. We have not yet
evaluated the effect this statement will have on our financial position or
results of operations.
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE (EPS)
Basic earnings (loss) per share of common stock is computed by dividing the net
income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by
dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common
stock and dilutive securities outstanding during the period. Dilutive securities
are not included in the weighted average number of shares when inclusion would
increase the income per share or decrease the loss per share. The computation of
diluted EPS equals the basic calculation in each year presented because common
stock equivalents were antidilutive due to losses from continuing operations for
each of the years presented.
9
Reconciliations of the numerators and denominators in the EPS computations for
loss from continuing operations follow:
Three Months Ended August 31,
-------------------------------
2008 2007
---------- ----------
NUMERATOR (in thousands):
Basic and diluted - loss from continuing
operations $ (112) $ (1,450)
========== ==========
DENOMINATOR:
Basic EPS - weighted average shares outstanding 6,625,114 6,508,700
Effect of dilutive securities -- --
---------- ----------
Diluted EPS - weighted average shares outstanding 6,625,114 6,508,700
========== ==========
Number of shares of common stock which could
be purchased with average outstanding securities
not included in diluted EPS because effect would
be antidilutive -
Stock options (average price of $4.89 and $4.76) 390,148 567,457
Warrants (average price of $6.32) 275,760 275,760
Restricted stock 20,500 12,935
|
The impacts of all outstanding options, warrants and restricted stock
outstanding at August 31, 2008, were not included in the calculation of diluted
EPS for the three months ended August 31, 2008, because to do so would be
antidilutive. Outstanding options, warrants and restricted stock could
potentially dilute EPS in the future.
INVESTMENT IN WENATCHEE PROJECT
We are providing construction management services under an agreement with the
City of Wenatchee, Washington, related to a multi-purpose events center in that
city. Investment in Wenatchee project of $47.2 million on the condensed
consolidated balance sheets represents costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings on this construction project, which we own until construction is
complete and the facility is sold. Revenues earned on this project are recorded
based on the ratio of costs incurred to the total costs expected to be incurred.
For this purpose, only costs related to performance under the contract are
considered. This cost-to-cost method is used because management believes costs
are the best available measure of our progress on this fixed-price contract,
which may be modified by incentive and penalty provisions. At August 31, 2008,
investment in Wenatchee project consisted of costs incurred of $46.1 million and
estimated earnings of $1.3 million. Estimated earnings of $1.1 million have been
included in project management fees and $0.2 million in project development fees
in the condensed consolidated statements of operations from the start of the
project through August 31, 2008. Under the terms of our construction management
agreement, we are not able to bill the City for our services and will receive
our revenue out of the proceeds from the sale of the facility.
At August 31, 2008 and May 31, 2008, approximately $5.9 million of payables
related to expenditures on the project were included in accounts payable.
Costs associated with the project, including all direct and indirect costs,
including contract supervision and interest during the construction period, are
being recorded as investment in Wenatchee project until the building is
completed. Accumulated interest through August 31, 2008, totals $1.2 million. We
expect project costs to total between $52 million and $54 million. The Greater
Wenatchee Regional Events Center Public Facilities District (PFD) has exercised
its option under a lease to buy the events center upon completion of
construction, which occurred in the first week of October 2008. As further
discussed in the following note, the PFD intends to issue bonds to finance its
purchase of the facility; however, as of the date of this filing the bonds have
not yet been issued.
10
NOTES PAYABLE
In August 2007, we entered into an agreement with Marshall Financial Group, LLC
(Marshall) to borrow up to $52.0 million for the construction of a multi-purpose
events center in Wenatchee, Washington. The outstanding principal balance of the
note bears interest at a rate of prime plus 0.25% (5.25% at August 31, 2008).
The note is payable in its entirety in August 2009. Financial covenants of the
Marshall note require that we maintain a level of stockholders' equity of not
less than $9.0 million and unrestricted cash, cash equivalents, time deposits
and marketable securities of not less than $3.5 million. As of August 31, 2008,
we were not in compliance with these financial covenants.
The PFD entered into an agreement with us in May 2007 to lease the events center
upon substantial completion which occurred in the first week of October 2008.
The PFD has exercised its right under the lease to purchase the facility. The
PFD intends to issue bonds to finance its purchase of the facility; however, as
of the date of this filing the bonds have not yet been issued. Credit markets
are currently unfavorable. The success of the bond issuance cannot be
guaranteed. The PFD may lease the facility from us on a short-term basis or
obtain other financing. The lease in place with the PFD bears interest at prime
plus 4.0% or the federal funds rate plus 7.0%, whichever is lower.
We, the PFD and Marshall are currently discussing alternatives to facilitate
completion of the sale of the center to the PFD and our repayment of the
construction loan. We are unable to obtain a waiver regarding noncompliance with
the financial covenants of the Marshall note pending resolution of these
matters. While we are working toward a timely resolution with the PFD and
Marshall, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so on terms acceptable
to us, if at all.
When the sale of the events center to the PFD is completed we will be required
to pay the construction loan in full. As of August 31, 2008, the $39.5 million
outstanding balance on the construction loan is classified as short-term notes
payable in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Interest on the Marshall
note accumulates monthly and increases both note payable and investment in
Wenatchee project in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.
We have a $1.75 million line of credit, with a bank, that matures on November 1,
2008, and bears interest at a rate of prime plus 2% (7.0% at August 31, 2008).
As of August 31, 2008, and through the date of this filing, we have received no
cash advances on this credit facility. Effective June 2008, we are required to
deposit cash in the amount of any requested cash advances. At August 31, 2008,
we had a maximum borrowing capacity of $0.5 million, as a result of a $1.25
million letter of credit in favor of Marshall, which reduced our available line
of credit. We deposited $1.25 million of the proceeds from the disposition of
Cragar with the bank in August 2008, as additional security for the letter of
credit. These funds are restricted, and unavailable to us, while the letter of
credit is outstanding. The letter of credit currently expires in August 2009,
however we expect the letter of credit to be surrendered by Marshall when we
repay our construction loan with proceeds from the sale of the events center in
Wenatchee, Washington.
The credit facility has been secured by substantially all of our tangible and
intangible assets. In order to borrow, we must meet certain financial covenants,
including maintaining a minimum current ratio (current assets compared to
current liabilities) of 1.05 as of the end of each fiscal quarter, a minimum
consolidated tangible net worth of $5 million as of the date of the amendment,
August 21, 2006, and an increase in tangible net worth of at least 75% of
consolidated net income plus 100% of all increases of equity (including the
amount of any stock offering or issuance) on each anniversary date of May 31
thereafter until maturity. We must maintain a zero balance for a consecutive 30
day period during the term of the facility. As of August 31, 2008, we were not
in compliance with these covenants, but the bank has waived these violations.
11
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
PURCHASE COMMITMENTS
We have purchase commitments for construction, furniture and fixtures totaling
approximately $5 million at August 31, 2008, primarily related to our
construction project in Wenatchee, Washington.
LITIGATION
As with all entertainment facilities there exists a degree of risk that the
general public may be accidentally injured. As of August 31, 2008, there were
various claims outstanding in this regard that management does not believe will
have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations. To
mitigate this risk, we maintain insurance coverage, which we believe effectively
covers any reasonably foreseeable potential liability. There is no assurance
that our insurance coverage will adequately cover all liabilities to which we
may be exposed.
We are a plaintiff and a counter-defendant in a lawsuit involving our
franchisee, Blue Line Hockey, LLC (Blue Line), which operates the Youngstown
Steelhounds. Our claim is for approximately $0.1 million in unpaid franchise and
assessment fees owed by Blue Line, plus our attorneys' fees. Blue Line's
counterclaim alleges that the WPHL fraudulently induced Blue Line's principal to
enter the license agreement by failing to comply with franchise disclosure
requirements, and that the WPHL made fraudulent representations to induce Blue
Line into signing the franchise agreement. Blue Line seeks rescission of the
license agreement, reimbursement of its franchise fee, $0.5 million of lease
payments, and reimbursement of travel expenses for the 2005-2006 season.
Although the outcome of this matter cannot be predicted with certainty, we
believe that we have both valid claims and valid defenses to the counterclaims.
Thus, we intend to vigorously prosecute our claims and defend the counterclaims.
No liability has been established at August 31, 2008, related to this matter.
CONTINGENCIES
We enter into indemnification provisions under our agreements with other
companies in our ordinary course of business, typically with business partners
and customers. Under these provisions we generally indemnify and hold harmless
the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party
as a result of our activities. The maximum potential amount of future payments
we could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is
unlimited. We have not incurred material costs to defend lawsuits or settle
claims related to these indemnification agreements. As a result, we believe the
estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal. Accordingly, we have no
liabilities recorded for these agreements as of August 31, 2008.
As of August 31, 2008, we have entered into various employment contracts with
key employees. Under certain circumstances we may be liable to pay amounts based
on the related contract terms.
GUARANTEES
We have entered into a contract with the entertainment facility in Rio Rancho,
New Mexico which guarantees certain economic performance standards. The term of
this contract is for a period of 10 years and expires in December 2014. In the
event these economic performance standards are not reached, we are obligated to
subsidize the difference between the actual performance and the guaranteed
performance. There are no recourse provisions under this agreement. The maximum
amount of future payments we could be required to make under the performance
guarantee is theoretical due to various unknown factors. However, the subsidy
would be limited to the cumulative operating losses of the facility for each
year of the guarantee. We have never made a material subsidy from this guarantee
and do not believe that any potential subsidy would be material.
In February 2008, we entered into a management agreement with the City of Allen,
Texas relative to a multi-purpose event center to be constructed in that city.
The initial term of this agreement is fifteen years, with an option by the city
to renew for an additional five years under certain conditions. This agreement
12
includes a guarantee that the event center will operate at a break-even point
and without cost to the city, not including any capital reserves and any other
off-sets described in the agreement. This guarantee requires that all amounts
reasonably required for the operation and maintenance of the event center will
be generated by the operation of the event center, or otherwise paid by us.
Should we be obligated to fund any operational shortfalls, the agreement
provides for reimbursement to us from future profits from the event center. The
maximum amount of future payments we could be required to make under this
operational guarantee is theoretical due to various unknown factors. However,
the guarantee would be limited to the operational loss from the facility for
each year of the guarantee, less any reimbursements from the facility. We do not
believe that any potential guarantee payments would be material based on the
operating results of similar facilities. The facility is expected to open in the
fall of 2009.
In May 2008, we entered into a management agreement with the City of
Independence, Missouri relative to a multi-purpose event center to be
constructed in that city. The initial term of this agreement ends fifteen years
from facility opening. The city may renew the agreement for an additional five
years under the same terms. The facility is expected to open in the fall of 2009
and has an operating year ended June 30. Our compensation under the agreement
may only come from the facility operating account, which is to be funded by
facility operations, as defined in the agreement. The management agreement
includes a guarantee that we will subsidize the operations of the facility to
the extent that funds in the facility operating account and a temporary
operating account are not adequate. Under the terms of the agreement the city
shall advance $0.5 million to fund a temporary operating reserve account, which
may be used to fund shortfalls in the facility operations account. Excess funds
in the facility operating account each operating year, after paying operating
expenses, our base Encore fee and GEMS commission, are to be used in the
following priority: 1) to reimburse us for any subsidy payments we have made, 2)
to replenish the temporary operating reserve account, 3) to fund the capital
reserve account and 4) to pay on a co-equal basis our incentive fee and deposits
to three additional reserve accounts. The maximum amount of future payments we
could be required to make under the guarantee is theoretical due to various
unknown factors. However, once the temporary operating reserve account is
depleted, the guarantee subsidy payments would be limited to the operational
loss each operating year, plus the amount of our Encore and GEMS fees. We do not
expect to make guarantee subsidy payments based on operating results of similar
facilities, however, no assurance can be made that a payment pursuant to this
guarantee would not be paid in the future and that such payment would not be
material.
In addition, under the terms of the management agreement with the City of
Independence, an amount not to exceed $0.50 per ticket, and excess operating
funds, are to be used to fund a capital reserve account up to $150 thousand in
each of the first five operating years and up to $250 thousand thereafter.
Should the capital reserve account not be fully funded for two consecutive
years, the management agreement terminates, unless the city elects to renew the
agreement.
As of August 31, 2008, we provide a secondary guarantee on a standby letter of
credit in favor of Ace American Insurance Company for $1.5 million related to a
guarantee under a workers compensation program. This letter of credit is fully
collateralized by a third party and our secondary guarantee of this letter of
credit does not affect our borrowing capacity under our line of credit. No
amounts have been drawn on this letter of credit as of August 31, 2008. We
believe the amount of payments under this guarantee is negligible, and as such,
have assigned no value to this guarantee at August 31, 2008.
In addition to our commitments and guarantees described above we also have the
commitments and guarantees described in the PVEC, LLC Joint Venture Note.
PVEC, LLC JOINT VENTURE
During the fiscal year 2006, we entered into a joint venture partnership
agreement with Prescott Valley Signature Entertainment, LLC to form Prescott
Valley Events Center, LLC (PVEC, LLC) to engage in the business of developing,
managing, and leasing the Prescott Valley Events Center in Prescott Valley,
Arizona. We are the managing member of PVEC, LLC. Construction of the center,
which opened in November 2006, was funded by proceeds from the issuance of $35
million in Industrial Development Authority of the County of Yavapai Convention
Center Facilities Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 (the Bonds).
13
We account for our investment in PVEC, LLC under the equity method. Our interest
in this entity is not a controlling one, as we do not own a majority voting
interest and as our ability to affect the business operations is significantly
limited by the partnership operating agreement. The PVEC, LLC operating
agreement also provides that a majority-in-interest of the members may replace
the managing member, or if the managing member is in default, a
majority-in-interest of the remaining members may replace the managing member.
Each member must contribute $1 thousand for a 50% interest in the joint venture.
We will also contribute $250 thousand as preferred capital while Prescott Valley
Signature Entertainment, LLC contributed land with an approximate value of $1.5
million as preferred capital. Because we have committed to pay our initial
capital contributions, these amounts are recorded in accounts payable in our
condensed consolidated balance sheets. Further, because PVEC, LLC is sustaining
losses, and profitable future operation is not assured, we recorded losses on
our investment, in the amount of $251 thousand, to bring our investment to zero.
Our investment remains zero at August 31, 2008.
Each member will receive a 5% return on preferred capital contributions and will
share equally in the gain or loss of PVEC, LLC. If funds available to PVEC, LLC
are insufficient to fund operations, the members agree to contribute 100% of the
cash needed until each member's preferred capital account balances are equal and
50% of the cash needed if its preferred capital contribution balances are equal.
PVEC, LLC is obligated to make lease payments equal to debt service payments on
the Bonds. In the event of any shortfalls in debt service payments, amounts will
first be paid by escrow accounts funded by 2% of the transaction privilege tax
(TPT) collected from the surrounding project area and from a lockbox account
containing 1) our initial contribution to PVEC of $250 thousand, 2) $100
thousand per year (increasing annually by inflation) from the Town of Prescott
Valley and 3) earnings from the events center.
We have a limited guarantee of the cash flow of PVEC, LLC as cash flows from
operations of the center are used to pay first operating expenses, second our
base management fee (4% of the center's operating revenue), third debt service
and then other items. The maximum losses under this guarantee are limited to our
management fee. We do not believe any potential payments under this guarantee
would be material.
Our consolidated financial statements reflect the following related to
transactions between us and PVEC, LLC (in thousands).
Three Months Ended August 31,
-----------------------------
2008 2007
---- ----
Facility management fees, exclusive of payroll (Encore) $ 17 $ 1
Facility management fees, payroll related (Encore) 155 254
Advertising sales commission (GEMS) 67 68
Ticket service fees (GetTix) 41 47
Cost of revenues, facility payroll (Encore) 155 254
August 31, May 31,
2008 2008
---- ----
Accounts payable $ 536 $ 502
Accrued liabilities 5 --
Accounts receivable -- 101
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On August 1, 2008, we closed a transaction under which we sold substantially all
of the assets of Cragar Industries, Inc. (Cragar), a licensor of an automotive
aftermarket wheel trademark and brand name - CRAGAR(R). The assets consisted
14
primarily of intangibles, including trademarks, service marks and domain names.
The net cash purchase price of $1.8 million was allocated primarily to the
trademarks, with the remainder to tooling, inventory and other assets.
The assets and liabilities of Cragar, included in our condensed consolidated
balance sheets in assets to be disposed and liabilities related to assets to be
disposed are as follows (in thousands):
May 31,
2008
--------
Receivables $ 116
Prepaid expenses and other assets 154
Deferred income tax asset 134
Trademarks 1,763
--------
Assets to be disposed $ 2,167
========
Accounts payable $ 37
Accrued liabilities 120
Deferred income tax liabiliy 22
Deferred revenues 54
--------
Liabilities related to assets to be disposed $ 233
========
|
We expect other cash flows from Cragar in fiscal 2009, to consist primarily of
the collection of receivables and payment of liabilities existing as of the
August 1, 2008, date of sale, which were largely unchanged from those existing
at May 31, 2008.
The following table presents selected operating data for Cragar (in thousands):
Three Months Ended August 31,
-----------------------------
2008 2007
---- ----
Revenues $ 60 $ 247
Loss on disposal (51) --
Loss before income taxes (48) (68)
Loss from discontinued operations, net
of income tax (48) (68)
|
SEGMENT INFORMATION
Each of our subsidiaries is a separate legal entity with a separate management
structure. Our corporate operations exist solely to support our subsidiary
segments. As such, certain corporate overhead costs are allocated to the
operating segments. There are no differences in accounting principles between
the operations.
At August 31, 2008 and May 31, 2008, goodwill relates to our ICC segment.
15
Three Months Ended
-------------------------------
Income (Loss)
Gross Before Identifiable
Revenues Income Taxes Assets
-------- ------------ ------
August 31, 2008
Global Entertainment Corporate Operations $ 101 $ (445) $49,945(a)
Central Hockey League/WPHL 274 3 491
Global Properties I 209 27 408
International Coliseums 463 337 143
Encore Facility Management 445 (51) 91
Global Entertainment Marketing Systems 245 150 144
Global Entertainment Ticketing 622 (133) 467
Discontinued Operations -- (48) --
------- ------- -------
Global Entertainment Coporation Consolidated $ 2,359 $ (160) $51,689
======= ======= =======
August 31, 2007
Global Entertainment Corporate Operations $ 163 $(1,480) $11,477(a)
Central Hockey League/WPHL 756 370 629
Global Properties I 31 (164) 267
International Coliseums 275 34 525
Encore Facility Management 964(b) (290) 317
Global Entertainment Marketing Systems 255 38 210
Global Entertainment Ticketing 780 42 526
Discontinued Operations -- (68) 3,144
------- ------- -------
Global Entertainment Coporation Consolidated $ 3,224 $(1,518) $17,095
======= ======= =======
|
(a) Global Entertainment Corporate Operations assets include the investment in
Wenatchee project of $47.2 million at August 31, 2008 and $7.7 million at
August 31, 2007. Global Entertainment Corporate Operations assets include
cash and cash equivalents of $0.6 million at August 31, 2008, and $2.8
million at August 31, 2007.
(b) Encore facility management fees for the quarter ended August 31, 2007,
include $0.3 million in revenues from the management contract with the
Chevrolet Center in Youngstown, Ohio, cancelled in September 2007.
16
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING DISCLOSURE
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Safe Harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 regarding future events, including statements concerning our
future operating results and financial condition and our future capital needs
and sources. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates,
forecasts, and projections as well as our beliefs and assumptions. Words such as
"outlook", "believes", "expects", "appears", "may", "will", "should",
"anticipates" or the negatives thereof or comparable terminology, are intended
to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements
are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions
that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results may differ materially
and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Factors
that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited
to those discussed in our report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31,
2008, under the section entitled "Risk Factors." You should not place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of
this Quarterly Report. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly
any forward-looking statements for any reason, unless otherwise required by law.
GENERAL
The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant
factors affecting our financial position and operating results during the
periods included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements.
DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY
Global Entertainment Corporation (referred to in this report as "we," "us,"
"Global,", "Company" or "GEC") is an integrated event and entertainment company
that is engaged, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, in sports management,
multipurpose events center and related real estate development, facility and
venue management and marketing, and venue ticketing. We are primarily focused on
projects located in mid-size communities in the United States.
Our current operating subsidiaries are Western Professional Hockey League, Inc.,
Global Properties I, International Coliseums Company, Inc., Global Entertainment
Marketing Systems, Inc., Global Entertainment Ticketing, and Encore Facility
Management.
We, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Western Professional Hockey League,
Inc., are the operator of the Western Professional Hockey League (WPHL), a minor
league professional hockey organization, and are the licensor of the
independently owned hockey teams which participate in the league. WPHL has
entered into a joint operating agreement with the Central Hockey League, Inc.
(CHL Inc.). The effect of the joint operating agreement is that the two leagues
had their respective teams join together and operate under the Central Hockey
League name (as the League). The terms of the joint operating agreement define
how the League will operate.
The League is a structured licensed sports league, which includes competing
teams located in various states, including Texas, Colorado, Kansas, Louisiana,
Mississippi, New Mexico, South Dakota, Oklahoma, and Arizona. There are 17 teams
in the 2008-2009 season and there were 17 teams in the 2007-08 season. In each
season 13 teams were licensed by WPHL. In each season, 4 teams, each of which
was an original CHL, Inc. team, continue to operate under a sanction agreement
that requires direct payments to the League pursuant to the terms and conditions
of the original CHL, Inc. agreements.
Global Properties I (GPI) provides services in targeted mid-sized communities
across the United States related to the development of multipurpose events
centers and surrounding multi-use real estate development.
GPI, along with International Coliseums Company, Inc. (ICC), develops
multipurpose events centers in mid-market communities. ICC's development of
multipurpose events centers promotes the development of the League by assisting
potential licensees in securing quality venues in which to play minor
17
professional hockey league games. The inter-relationship between GPI, ICC and
WPHL is a key factor in the viability of a managed multipurpose entertainment
facility.
Global Entertainment Marketing Systems, Inc. (GEMS), promotes, markets, and
sells various services related to multipurpose entertainment facilities,
including all contractually obligated income (COI) sources such as facility
naming rights, luxury suite sales, club seat license sales, and facility
sponsorship agreements.
Global Entertainment Ticketing (GetTix) provides ticketing services for the
multipurpose event centers developed by GPI and ICC, existing League licensees,
and various other entertainment venues, theaters, concert halls, and other
facilities and event coordinators. GetTix provides a full ticketing solution by
way of box office, phone, internet and print-at-home service that utilizes
distribution outlets in each market. GetTix uses third-party, state-of-the-art
software to deliver ticketing capabilities that include database flexibility,
easy season and group options, financial reporting and marketing resources.
Encore Facility Management (Encore) provides a full complement of multipurpose
events center operational services. These services provide administrative
oversight in the areas of facility/property management and finance, event
bookings, and food and beverage. Encore is currently involved with facility
management of multipurpose events centers developed by GPI and ICC. Facility
management operations are conducted under separate limited liability companies.
On August 1, 2008, we closed a transaction pursuant to which we sold
substantially all of the assets of our subsidiary Cragar Industries, Inc.
(Cragar), a licensor of an automotive aftermarket wheel trademark and brand -
CRAGAR(R). The assets consisted primarily of intangible property, including
trademarks, service marks and domain names. The purchase price was approximately
$1.9 million in cash. Of the cash proceeds, $0.1 million was used for
transaction-related costs and $1.25 million has been set aside in a restricted
account as security for a letter of credit. The remainder of the funds was made
available for working capital and general corporate purposes.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES, ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
Significant accounting policies are described in the audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in our Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended May 31, 2008. We believe our most critical accounting policies
and estimates relate to revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful
accounts, arena guarantees, the carrying value of goodwill, the realization of
deferred income tax assets, the fair value of liability related to the secondary
guarantee related to a worker's compensation program, and the allocation of
expenses, division of profit or loss relating to the joint operating agreement,
and the application of the percentage-of-completion method. Due to the
uncertainties inherent in the estimation process and the significance of these
items, it is at least reasonably possible that the estimates in connection with
these items could be materially revised within the next year.
OVERVIEW AND FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
During fiscal year 2008 we decided to divest of Cragar. As a result, the
operations of Cragar have been classified as loss from discontinued operations
in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for all periods
presented. Revenues and operating costs in the condensed consolidated statements
of operations now exclude all accounts of Cragar.
18
THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2008, COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31,
2007
REVENUES (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
---------------------------------------------
August 31, % of August 31, % of
2008 Revenue 2007 Revenue Change % Change
---- ------- ---- ------- ------ --------
Project management fees $ 465 19.7 $ 125 3.9 $ 340 272.0
Facility management fees 445 18.9 964 29.9 (519) (53.8)
License fees 375 15.9 917 28.4 (542) (59.1)
Ticket service fees 620 26.3 779 24.2 (159) (20.4)
Project development fees 209 8.9 181 5.6 28 15.5
Advertising sales commissions 245 10.4 255 7.9 (10) (3.9)
Other revenue -- -- 3 0.1 (3) (100.0)
------ ------- ------ ------- ------ -------
Gross Revenues $2,359 100.0 $3,224 100.0 $ (865) (26.8)
====== ======= ====== ======= ====== =======
|
Total revenues decreased $0.9 million, or 26.8%, to $2.4 million for the three
months ended August 31, 2008, from $3.2 million for the three months ended
August 31, 2007. The ICC project management revenues increase of $0.3 million
was offset by the decrease in facility management revenues of $0.5 million,
decrease in license fees of $0.5 million and the decrease in ticket service fees
of $0.2 million.
ICC project management revenues increased $0.3 million to $0.5 million for the
quarter ended August 31, 2008, from $0.1 million in the prior year quarter.
Project management fees for the quarter ended August 31, 2008, includes $0.3
million of fees on the project in Independence, Missouri beginning in February
2008 and the project in Allen, Texas beginning in June 2008. Each project is
anticipated to have a twenty-month duration. In addition to the projects in
Independence, Missouri and Allen, Texas, ICC is also managing the construction
project in Wenatchee, Washington.
Facility management fees decreased $0.5 million, or 53.8%, to $0.4 million for
the three months ended August 31, 2008, from $1.0 million in the prior year
quarter. The cancellation of the management contract with the Chevrolet Center
in Youngstown, Ohio, effective September 2007 contributed $0.3 million of the
decrease. The remainder of the decrease is the result of year-over-year
decreases in fees from centers under management in both quarters with the
decline in the number of events held and decline in attendance at facilities in
Rio Rancho, New Mexico and Prescott Valley, Arizona. Encore's current facility
management contracts include the facilities in Rio Rancho, New Mexico and
Prescott Valley, Arizona, and preopening service fees for Wenatchee, Washington.
Encore principally manages employees under each of its current facility
management contracts and, therefore, payroll costs from such employees are
recognized by Encore as facility management fee revenue and are also included in
cost of revenues.
License fees decreased $0.5 million, or 59.1%, to $0.4 million for the quarter
ended August 31, 2008, from $0.9 million for the quarter ended August 31, 2007.
The prior year quarter included $0.4 million of license transfer fees. Since
license transfer fees are not regularly recurring and are difficult to predict,
there is no assurance that we will be able to increase or sustain our operating
capital through this source.
Ticket service fees decreased $0.2 million, or 20.4%, to $0.6 million for the
three months ended August 31, 2008, from $0.8 million for the prior year
quarter. This decrease in ticket service fees reflects 1) the $0.1 million
reduction in fees due to the discontinuance of services to Chevrolet Center in
Youngstown, Ohio, in the spring of 2008 and 2) decreased sales with the decline
in the number of events held and attendance at events.
19
OPERATING COSTS (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
---------------------------------------------
August 31, % of August 31, % of
2008 Revenue 2007 Revenue Change % Change
---- ------- ---- ------- ------ --------
Cost of revenues $ 979 41.5 $ 1,700 52.7 $ (721) (42.4)
General and administrative costs 1,496 63.4 3,013 93.5 (1,517) (50.3)
------- ----- ------- ----- ------- ----
Total Operating Costs $ 2,475 104.9 $ 4,713 146.2 $(2,238) (47.5)
======= ===== ======= ===== ======= ====
|
Total operating costs decreased by $2.2 million, or 47.5%, to $2.5 million for
the quarter ended August 31, 2008, from $4.7 million in the prior year quarter.
Cost of revenues decreased by $0.7 million, or 42.4%, to $1.0 million for the
quarter ended August 31, 2008, from $1.7 million for the prior year quarter.
This decrease resulted primarily from 1) a $0.3 million decrease in facility
management payroll associated with the decline in the number of events held and
attendance in facilities in Rio Rancho, New Mexico and Prescott Valley, Arizona
and 2) a $0.3 million decrease in facility management payroll associated with
the facility in Youngstown, Ohio, due to cancellation of the management
agreement.
General and administrative expenses decreased $1.5 million, or 50.3%, to $1.5
million for the quarter ended August 31, 2008, from $3.0 million in the prior
year quarter. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is comprised
of 1) a $1.2 million decrease in legal and settlement costs due to a reduction
in legal defense costs with the settlement of several matters since August 31,
2007, and 2) a $0.2 million reduction in severance expenses.
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
---------------------------------------------
August 31, % of August 31, % of
2008 Revenue 2007 Revenue Change % Change
---- ------- ---- ------- ------ --------
Loss from Continuing Operations $ (112) (4.8) $(1,450) (45.0) $1,338 (92.3)
====== ==== ======= ===== ====== =====
|
Loss from continuing operations was $0.1 million for the three months ended
August 31, 2008, compared to a net loss of $1.5 million for the three months
ended August 31, 2007. The improvement of $1.3 million is primarily attributable
to the $1.2 million decrease in legal and settlement costs.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of August 31, 2008, we have $0.6 million in cash and cash equivalents,
including cash collected for GetTix tickets of approximately $0.6 million for
events scheduled to occur in the future, and $1.25 million in restricted cash,
On August 1, 2008, we closed a transaction under which we sold substantially all
of the assets of Cragar. The assets consisted primarily of intangible property,
including trademarks, service marks and domain names. The purchase price was
approximately $1.8 million net of transaction-related costs and, as discussed in
greater detail below, $1.25 million of the cash received has been set aside in a
restricted account as security for a letter of credit. The remainder of the
funds was available for working capital and general corporate purposes.
Cash used by operating activities in the quarter ended August 31, 2008, was $0.3
million compared to cash used by operating activities of $0.5 million in the
prior year first quarter.
Cash used in investing activities increased $3.2 million to $10.8 million for
the quarter ended August 31, 2008, compared to cash used in investing activities
of $7.6 million in the prior year first quarter. Construction costs for the
events center in Wenatchee, Washington increased $5.0 million. The construction
20
costs are being funded primarily with a construction loan with Marshall
Financial Group, LLC, as reflected as a source of funds in the financing
section. Offsetting the increased construction costs were the $1.8 million
proceeds from the disposition of Cragar, net of transaction-related costs.
Cash provided by financing activities totaled $11.2 million for the quarter
ended August 31, 2008, compared to cash provided by financing activities of $6.5
million in the prior year first quarter. During the 2008 quarter we received
$12.7 million in proceeds from the construction loan with Marshall Financial
Group, LLC. We were also required to set aside $1.25 million in a restricted
account as security for a letter of credit.
In August 2007, we entered into the agreement with Marshall Financial Group, LLC
(Marshall) to borrow up to $52.0 million for the construction of a multi-purpose
events center in Wenatchee, Washington. The outstanding principal balance of the
note bears interest at a rate of prime plus 0.25% (5.25% at August 31, 2008).
The note is payable in its entirety in August 2009. Financial covenants of the
Marshall note require that we maintain a level of stockholders' equity of not
less than $9.0 million and unrestricted cash, cash equivalents, time deposits
and marketable securities of not less than $3.5 million. As of August 31, 2008,
we were not in compliance with these financial covenants.
The Greater Wenatchee Regional Events Center Public Facilities District (PFD)
entered into an agreement with us in May 2007 to lease the events center upon
substantial completion, which occurred in the first week of October 2008. The
PFD has exercised its right under the lease to purchase the facility. The PFD
intends to issue bonds to finance its purchase of the facility; however, as of
the date of this filing the bonds have not yet been issued. Credit markets are
currently unfavorable. The success of the bond issuance cannot be guaranteed.
The PFD may lease the facility from us on a short-term basis or obtain other
financing. The lease in place with the PFD bears interest at prime plus 4.0% or
the federal funds rate plus 7.0%, whichever is lower.
We, the PFD and Marshall are currently discussing alternatives to facilitate
completion of the sale of the center to the PFD and our repayment of the
construction loan. We are unable to obtain a waiver regarding noncompliance with
the financial covenants of the Marshall note pending resolution of these
matters. While we are working toward a timely resolution with the PFD and
Marshall, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so on terms acceptable
to us, if at all.
When the sale of the events center to the PFD is completed we will be required
to pay the construction loan in full. As of August 31, 2008, the $39.5 million
outstanding balance on the construction loan is classified as short-term notes
payable in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Interest on the Marshall
note accumulates monthly and increases both notes payable and investment in
Wenatchee project in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.
We have a $1.75 million line of credit that matures on November 1, 2008, and
bears interest at a rate of prime plus 2% (7.0% at August 31, 2008). As of
August 31, 2008, and through the date of this filing, we have received no cash
advances on this credit facility. Effective June 2008, we are required to
deposit cash in the amount of any requested cash advances. At August 31, 2008,
and as of the date of this filing, we had a maximum borrowing capacity of $0.5
million, as a result of a $1.25 million letter of credit in favor of Marshall,
which reduced our available line of credit. We deposited $1.25 million of the
proceeds from the disposition of Cragar with the bank in August 2008, as
additional security for the letter of credit. These funds are restricted, and
unavailable to us, as long as the letter of credit is outstanding. The letter of
credit currently expires in August 2009; however we expect the letter of credit
to be surrendered by Marshall when we repay our construction loan with proceeds
from the sale of the events center in Wenatchee, Washington.
The credit facility has been secured by substantially all of our tangible and
intangible assets. In order to borrow, we must meet certain financial covenants,
including maintaining a minimum current ratio (current assets compared to
current liabilities) of 1.05 as of the end of each fiscal quarter, a minimum
consolidated tangible net worth of $5 million as of the date of the amendment,
August 21, 2006, and an increase in tangible net worth of at least 75% of
consolidated net income plus 100% of all increases of equity (including the
amount of any stock offering or issuance) on each anniversary date of May 31
thereafter until maturity. We must maintain a zero balance for a consecutive 30
day period during the term of the facility. As of August 31, 2008, we were not
in compliance with these covenants, but the bank has waived these violations.
21
We continue to evaluate the profitability of, and synergies among, our various
subsidiaries and may determine to dispose of one or more of them, as we move
forward with our business plan. Based on our current forecast and historical
results, we expect to have adequate cash flow from available sources to fund our
operating needs through August 31, 2009. We expect cash and cash flow will be
low in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 until the sale of the Wenatchee events
center. We do not expect to borrow under the line of credit, since any advances
will require us to deposit cash in the amount of the requested advance. If we
continue to not comply with contractually obligated financial covenants, our
business or profitability deteriorates or we incur unexpected expenses or asset
impairments, it could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and
financial resources. We may be required to refinance all or part of our existing
debt. We cannot guarantee that we would be able to do so on terms acceptable to
us, if at all.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, "An Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109," which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of
a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation
reflects the benefit recognition approach, where a tax benefit is recognized
when it is more likely than not to be sustained based on the technical merits of
the position. We adopted this interpretation effective June 1, 2007, and there
was no impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 "Fair Value Measurements". The
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. We adopted this statement prospectively effective
June 1, 2008, and there was no impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities". This statement permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. An entity shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the
fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting
date. We adopted this statement prospectively effective June 1, 2008, and there
was no impact on our financial position or results of operations. We have not
elected the fair value option for any eligible items.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51". This statement
establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The statement also
provides consolidated income statement presentation guidance and requires
expanded disclosures. This statement is effective for our fiscal year beginning
June 1, 2009, and interim periods within that year. The statement will be
applied prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements,
which will be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. We have not yet
evaluated the effect the statement will have on our financial position or
results of operations.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Not applicable.
ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 as of August 31, 2008. Based on
that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the
period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
22
Our management, including its principal executive officer and the principal
financial officer, do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures
will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a
control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and
the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of
the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if
any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include
the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls
can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two
or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any
system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected. We
monitor our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls and makes
modifications as necessary; our intent in this regard is that the disclosure
controls and procedures will be maintained as dynamic systems that change
(including with improvements and corrections) as conditions warrant.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING.
There have not been changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as
such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act)
during the first quarter of fiscal 2009 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As with all entertainment facilities there exists a degree of risk that the
general public may be accidentally injured at one of the facilities we develop,
design or manage. As of August 31, 2008, there were various claims outstanding
in this regard that management does not believe will have a material effect on
our financial condition or results of operations. To mitigate this risk, we
maintain insurance coverage, which we believe effectively covers any reasonably
foreseeable potential liability. There is no assurance, however, that our
insurance coverage will adequately cover all liabilities to which we may be
exposed.
We are a plaintiff and a counter-defendant in a lawsuit involving a former
licensee, Blue Line Hockey, LLC (Blue Line), which operates the Youngstown
Steelhounds. This suit was filed in Maricopa County Superior Court of Arizona on
November 7, 2006. Our claim is for approximately $0.1 million in unpaid license
and assessment fees owed by Blue Line, plus our attorneys' fees. Blue Line's
counterclaim alleges that WPHL fraudulently induced Blue Line's principal to
enter the license agreement by failing to comply with franchise disclosure
requirements, and that WPHL made fraudulent representations to induce Blue Line
into signing the license agreement. Blue Line seeks rescission of the license
agreement, $0.5 million of lease payments, reimbursement of its franchise fee,
and reimbursement of travel expenses for the 2005-2006 season. Although the
outcome of this matter cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that we
have both valid claims and valid defenses to the counterclaims. Thus, we intend
to vigorously prosecute our claims and defend the counterclaims. No liability
has been established at August 31, 2008, related to this matter.
We were a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Nustadia Developments Inc. and PBK
Architects. The suit arose out of certain contracts between us and the
plaintiffs, pursuant to which we agreed to use architectural design and
development management services of the plaintiffs with respect to certain arena
development projects. The suit sought direct damages of $4.5 million and other
unspecified damages for alleged breach of contract, tortious interference with
business expectancy, and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair
dealing. This suit was filed in December 2005, in the Maricopa County Superior
Court of Arizona. We settled the matter in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008
and are currently waiting for dismissal.
23
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Refer to our report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008, under
Item 1A. "Risk Factors."
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
See Exhibit Index attached.
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Global Entertainment Corporation
(Registrant)
October 15, 2008 By /s/ Richard Kozuback
-----------------------------------------------
Richard Kozuback
President & Chief Executive Officer
October 15, 2008 By /s/ James Yeager
-----------------------------------------------
James Yeager
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
|
25
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated herein pursuant to
Regulation S-K, Item 601:
Exhibit
-------
10.1 Asset Purchase Agreement between Danbom Temporary, Inc. and
Cragar Industries, Inc., dated July 31, 2008 (1)
31.1 Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350-Section 302,
signed by Richard Kozuback, Chief Executive Officer.*
31.2 Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350-Section 302,
signed by James Yeager, Chief Financial Officer.*
32 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350-Section 906,
signed by Richard Kozuback, Chief Executive Officer and James
Yeager, Chief Financial Officer.*
----------
|
* Filed herewith.
(1) Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our current report on
Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on August 8, 2008.
Global Entertainment (AMEX:GEE)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2024 to Jun 2024
Global Entertainment (AMEX:GEE)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2023 to Jun 2024