0001512228 false 2022 --06-30 FY
Unlimited Unlimited 1 9929 109005 P24M P4Y 163 P2Y P2Y P2Y P2Y P3Y
P3Y 2022-11-09 2023-09-18 2023-11-15 2023-12-14 2023-12-16
2024-12-17 2025-05-30 9989000 2022-12-18 2023-05-10 2024-06-30
2025-02-19 252 873 P1Y3M19D 0 61 0001512228 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
0001512228 2021-12-31 0001512228 2022-09-06 0001512228 2022-06-30
0001512228 2021-06-30 0001512228 2020-07-01 2021-06-30 0001512228
2019-07-01 2020-06-30 0001512228 2020-06-30 0001512228 2019-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:CommonStockMember 2019-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember 2019-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 2019-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:CommonStockMember 2020-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember 2020-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 2020-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:CommonStockMember 2021-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember 2021-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 2021-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:CommonStockMember 2019-07-01 2020-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember 2019-07-01 2020-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember
2019-07-01 2020-06-30 0001512228 us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2020-07-01 2021-06-30 0001512228 us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2020-07-01 2021-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 2020-07-01
2021-06-30 0001512228 us-gaap:CommonStockMember 2021-07-01
2022-06-30 0001512228 us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember 2021-07-01
2022-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 2021-07-01
2022-06-30 0001512228 us-gaap:CommonStockMember 2022-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember 2022-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 2022-06-30
0001512228 niobf:Entity0896800BCLtdMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
0001512228 niobf:Entity0896800BCLtdMember 2020-07-01 2021-06-30
0001512228 niobf:Entity0896800BCLtdMember 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:Entity0896800BCLtdMember 2021-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ElkCreekResourcesCorpMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ElkCreekResourcesCorpMember 2020-07-01 2021-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ElkCreekResourcesCorpMember 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ElkCreekResourcesCorpMember 2021-06-30 0001512228
niobf:Entity0896800BCLtdMember niobf:ShareExchangeAgreementMember
niobf:ElkCreekResourcesCorpMember 2011-07-01 2012-06-30 0001512228
niobf:Entity0896800BCLtdMember niobf:ShareExchangeAgreementMember
2011-07-01 2012-06-30 0001512228 niobf:ShareExchangeAgreementMember
currency:CAD 2011-07-01 2012-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ShareExchangeAgreementMember currency:CAD 2012-06-30
0001512228 niobf:OptionAgreementMember
niobf:ElkCreekResourcesCorpMember 2021-04-21 2021-04-23 0001512228
niobf:LandholderArrangementMember niobf:ElkCreekResourcesCorpMember
2021-04-21 2021-04-23 0001512228 us-gaap:LandMember 2022-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:LandMember 2021-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:BuildingMember 2022-06-30 0001512228 us-gaap:BuildingMember
2021-06-30 0001512228 niobf:ConvertibleSecurityMember 2022-06-30
0001512228 niobf:NordminConvertibleNoteMember 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:NordminConvertibleNoteMember 2021-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ConvertibleSecurityMember 2021-06-30 0001512228 2021-02-16
2021-02-19 0001512228 2021-02-19 0001512228 2021-02-18 2021-02-19
0001512228 us-gaap:RevolvingCreditFacilityMember 2017-01-16
0001512228 2017-01-16 0001512228
niobf:LindIIIConvertibleSecurityMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
0001512228 2021-02-17 2022-02-18 0001512228
niobf:LindIIIConvertibleSecurityMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
0001512228 2021-02-17 2021-02-19 0001512228
niobf:NordminConvertibleNoteMember currency:CAD 2021-07-01
2022-06-30 0001512228 niobf:ConvertibleSecurityMember
niobf:LindAssetManagementIVLLCMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
0001512228 niobf:NordminAgreementMember
niobf:NordminConvertibleNoteMember currency:CAD 2022-06-30
0001512228 niobf:ConvertibleSecurityMember currency:CAD 2022-06-30
0001512228 niobf:NordminConvertibleNoteMember
niobf:NordminAgreementMember 2020-12-16 2020-12-18 0001512228
niobf:NordminConvertibleNoteMember niobf:NordminAgreementMember
2020-12-18 0001512228
us-gaap:MeasurementInputRiskFreeInterestRateMember 2020-12-30
0001512228 us-gaap:MeasurementInputExpectedDividendRateMember
2020-12-30 0001512228 us-gaap:MeasurementInputPriceVolatilityMember
2020-12-30 0001512228 us-gaap:MeasurementInputExpectedTermMember
2021-07-01 2022-06-30 0001512228 niobf:ConvertibleSecurityMember
2021-06-30 0001512228 niobf:ConvertibleSecurityMember 2020-06-30
0001512228 niobf:ConvertibleSecurityMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
0001512228 niobf:ConvertibleSecurityMember 2020-07-01 2021-06-30
0001512228 niobf:ConvertibleSecurityMember 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:NordminConvertibleNoteMember 2020-06-30 0001512228
niobf:NordminConvertibleNoteMember 2020-07-01 2021-06-30 0001512228
niobf:NordminConvertibleNoteMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:PrivatePlacementMember currency:CAD 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:PrivatePlacementMember currency:CAD 2022-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:PrivatePlacementMember currency:CAD
us-gaap:WarrantMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:PrivatePlacementMember currency:CAD 2021-05-08 2021-05-10
0001512228 us-gaap:PrivatePlacementMember currency:CAD 2021-05-10
0001512228 us-gaap:PrivatePlacementMember currency:CAD
us-gaap:WarrantMember 2021-05-09 2021-05-10 0001512228
niobf:LongTermIncentivePlanMember 2020-11-03 2020-11-05 0001512228
currency:CAD 2022-06-30 0001512228 currency:CAD 2021-07-01
2022-06-30 0001512228 currency:CAD 2019-06-30 0001512228
currency:CAD 2019-07-01 2020-06-30 0001512228 currency:CAD
2020-06-30 0001512228 currency:CAD 2020-07-01 2021-06-30 0001512228
currency:CAD 2021-06-30 0001512228 niobf:ExercisePrice0.47Member
2021-07-01 2022-06-30 0001512228 niobf:ExercisePrice0.47Member
2022-06-30 0001512228 niobf:ExercisePrice0.47Member currency:CAD
2022-06-30 0001512228 niobf:ExercisePrice0.84Member 2021-07-01
2022-06-30 0001512228 niobf:ExercisePrice0.84Member 2022-06-30
0001512228 niobf:ExercisePrice0.84Member currency:CAD 2022-06-30
0001512228 niobf:ExercisePrice0.54Member 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
0001512228 niobf:ExercisePrice0.54Member 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice0.54Member currency:CAD 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice0.75Member 2021-07-01 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice0.75Member 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice0.75Member currency:CAD 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice0.75OneMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice0.75OneMember 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice0.75OneMember currency:CAD 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice1.36Member 2021-07-01 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice1.36Member 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice1.36Member currency:CAD 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice1.10Member 2021-07-01 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice1.10Member 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice1.10Member currency:CAD 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice0.80Member 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice1.63Member 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:ExercisePrice0.97Member 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:GeneralSecurityAgreementMember
srt:ChiefExecutiveOfficerMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:GeneralSecurityAgreementMember niobf:MarkSmithMember
2021-04-30 0001512228 niobf:MarkSmithMember 2020-07-01 2021-06-30
0001512228 niobf:NonRevolvingCreditFacilityAgreementMember
srt:ChiefExecutiveOfficerMember 2020-06-30 0001512228
niobf:NonRevolvingCreditFacilityAgreementMember
srt:ChiefExecutiveOfficerMember 2019-07-01 2020-06-30 0001512228
niobf:AmendedNonRevolvingCreditFacilityAgreementMember
srt:ChiefExecutiveOfficerMember 2020-01-17 0001512228
niobf:AmendedNonRevolvingCreditFacilityAgreementMember
srt:ChiefExecutiveOfficerMember 2020-04-03 0001512228
niobf:AmendedNonRevolvingCreditFacilityAgreementMember
srt:ChiefExecutiveOfficerMember 2020-06-10 0001512228
niobf:FeasibilityStudyAndEngineeringMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
0001512228 niobf:FeasibilityStudyAndEngineeringMember 2020-07-01
2021-06-30 0001512228 niobf:FeasibilityStudyAndEngineeringMember
2019-07-01 2020-06-30 0001512228
niobf:FieldManagementAndOtherMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
0001512228 niobf:FieldManagementAndOtherMember 2020-07-01
2021-06-30 0001512228 niobf:FieldManagementAndOtherMember
2019-07-01 2020-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:ExplorationAndProductionEquipmentMember 2021-07-01
2022-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:ExplorationAndProductionEquipmentMember 2020-07-01
2021-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:ExplorationAndProductionEquipmentMember 2019-07-01
2020-06-30 0001512228 niobf:GeologistsAndFieldStaffMember
2021-07-01 2022-06-30 0001512228
niobf:GeologistsAndFieldStaffMember 2020-07-01 2021-06-30
0001512228 niobf:CorporateOfficeMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:ForeignCountryMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:ForeignCountryMember 2020-07-01 2021-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:ForeignCountryMember 2019-07-01 2020-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:DomesticCountryMember 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:DomesticCountryMember 2020-07-01 2021-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:DomesticCountryMember 2019-07-01 2020-06-30
0001512228 us-gaap:ForeignCountryMember 2022-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:ForeignCountryMember 2021-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:DomesticCountryMember 2022-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:DomesticCountryMember 2021-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member 2022-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member 2022-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member 2022-06-30 0001512228
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member 2021-06-30 iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares iso4217:USD xbrli:shares xbrli:pure niobf:number
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
(Mark
One)
☒ |
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 |
For
the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2022 |
|
OR |
|
☐ |
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For
the transition period
from
to
Commission
file number:
000-55710 |
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
British Columbia, Canada |
|
|
98-1262185 |
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
|
7000
South Yosemite Street,
Suite 115
Centennial,
CO
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
80112
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (855)
264-6267
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of each class |
Trading
Symbol(s) |
Name
of each exchange on which registered |
Not
Applicable |
Not
Applicable |
Not
Applicable |
Securities
registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: Common Shares,
without par value
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ☐
No ☒
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ☐
No ☒
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit such files).
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting
company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
Accelerated Filer |
☐ |
Accelerated
Filer |
☐ |
Non-Accelerated Filer
|
☒
|
Smaller
Reporting Company
|
☒
|
|
Emerging
Growth Company |
☐ |
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and
attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of
its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b)
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered
public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit
report.
☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ☐
No ☒
At December 31, 2021, the aggregate market value of the
registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was $245.4
million based on the closing sale price as reported on the
Toronto Stock Exchange and the daily exchange rate as reported by
the Bank of Canada for conversion of Canadian dollars into U.S.
dollars. There were
278,127,688 common shares outstanding on September 6,
2022.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The
registrant incorporates by reference in Part III hereof portions of
its definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A for its 2022 annual
general meeting of shareholders.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Contents
Glossary of Terms
0896800 |
0896800
B.C. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and 100% owner
of ECRC |
2019
NI 43-101 Elk Creek Technical Report |
A
CIM-compliant NI 43-101 technical report for the Elk Creek Project
filed on SEDAR on May 29, 2019, with an effective date of April 16,
2019 |
2022
Elk Creek Feasibility Study |
A
feasibility study prepared by qualified persons, the results of
which are summarized in the 2022 NI 43-101 Elk Creek Technical
Report and the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report
Summary. |
2022
NI 43-101 Elk Creek Technical Report |
A
CIM-compliant NI 43-101 technical report for the Elk Creek Project
filed on SEDAR on June 28, 2022, with an effective date of June 28,
2022 |
Air
Permit |
A
State of Nebraska permit which describes all the prospective air
emissions from a facility |
CIM |
Canadian
Institute of Mining and Metallurgy |
Common
Shares |
The
Common Shares, without par value, in the capital stock of NioCorp
as the same are constituted on the date hereof, as traded on the
TSX |
COVID-19 |
The
disease caused by a novel strain of coronavirus that the World
Health Organization declared a global pandemic in March
2020 |
deposit |
A
mineralized body which has been physically delineated by sufficient
drilling, trenching, and/or underground work, and found to contain
a sufficient average grade of metal or metals to warrant further
exploration and/or development expenditures. Such a deposit does
not qualify as a commercially mineable ore body or as containing
reserves or ore, unless final legal, technical, and economic
factors are resolved. |
diamond
drilling |
A
type of rotary drilling in which diamond bits are used as the
rock-cutting tool to produce a recoverable drill core sample of
rock for observation and analysis |
Dodd-Frank
Act |
The
United States Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act of 2010 |
ECRC |
Elk
Creek Resources Corp., a private Nebraska corporation and wholly
owned subsidiary of 0896800 |
Elk
Creek Project |
NioCorp’s
niobium, scandium, and titanium project located on the Elk Creek
Property |
Elk
Creek Property |
NioCorp’s
Carbonatite property located in Southeast Nebraska, USA on which
the Elk Creek Project is located |
EPA |
The
United States Environmental Protection Agency |
Exchange
Act |
United
States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
Ferroniobium
or FeNb |
An
iron-niobium alloy, with a niobium content of 60-70% |
grade |
A
particular quantity of metal or mineral, relative to other
constituents, in a specified quantity of rock |
HSLA
steel |
High-strength
low-alloy steel |
Lind
III |
Lind
Global Asset Management III, LLC, an entity managed by The Lind
Partners, a New York based asset management firm |
Lind
III Agreement |
NioCorp’s
definitive convertible security funding agreement with Lind III
dated February 16, 2021 |
Lind
III Convertible Security |
a
convertible security dated as of February 16, 2021, issued to Lind
III pursuant to the Lind III Agreement with a face value of
$11,700,000 (representing $10,000,000 in funding plus an implied
8.5% interest rate per annum for the term of the Lind III
Convertible Security) |
Lind
III Warrants |
8,558,000
Common Share purchase warrants, exercisable at a price per Common
Share of C$0.97, expiring February 19, 2025, and issued on February
19, 2021, to Lind III pursuant to the Lind III
Agreement |
LoM |
Life
of Mine, the period from the beginning of construction to the end
of mine life |
Mark
Smith |
Chief
Executive Officer, President, and Executive Chairman of
NioCorp |
NAAQS |
The
U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards limits on atmospheric
concentration of six pollutants that cause smog, acid rain, and
other health hazards, as established by the EPA |
NDEE |
Nebraska
Department of Environment and Energy |
NI
43-101 |
National
Instrument 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators
entitled “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” |
niobium
or Nb |
The
element niobium (atomic number 41), a transition metal primarily
used in the production of HSLA steel |
Nb2O5 |
Niobium
pentoxide, a commercial form of refined niobium |
NioCorp,
we, us, our or the Company |
NioCorp
Developments Ltd. |
NSR |
Net
Smelter Return, the net revenue that the owner of a mining property
receives from the sale of the mine’s products less transportation
and refining costs |
Nordmin |
The
Nordmin Group of Companies |
Nordmin
Note |
A
convertible note in the principal amount of approximately
$1,872,000 issued by the Company to Nordmin pursuant to a
convertible note and warrant subscription agreement, dated as of
December 18, 2020, between NioCorp and Nordmin |
Offtake
Agreement |
An
agreement between NioCorp and a third party for the purchase and
sale of products to be produced from the Elk Creek
Project |
OTP |
An
option to purchase agreement between NioCorp’s wholly owned
subsidiary ECRC and an individual landowner relating to land and/or
mineral rights |
Rare
earth elements, rare earths or REEs |
A
group of 15 elements referred to as the lanthanide series in the
periodic table of elements. Scandium and yttrium, while not true
REEs, are also included in this categorization because they exhibit
similar properties to the lanthanides and are found in the same ore
bodies. Individual mineral deposits may not contain all REEs in
economically recoverable quantities. |
Rare
earth products |
Commercial
rare earth products currently being examined for production by the
Company, including neodymium-praseodymium oxide (sometimes referred
to as didymium oxide), dysprosium oxide, and terbium oxide. These
are the primary rare earths compounds used to manufacture the
world’s most powerful permanent magnets. |
scandium
or Sc |
The
element scandium (atomic number 21), a transition metal used as an
alloying agent with aluminum that provides high strength and lower
weight for aerospace industry components and other applications
that need lightweight metals. It also is used in the electrolyte
layer of solid oxide fuel cells. |
Sc2O3 |
Scandium
trioxide, the primary form of refined scandium |
SEC |
United
States Securities and Exchange Commission |
Securities
Act |
United
States Securities Act of 1933, as amended |
SEDAR |
System
for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval, the electronic
filing system for the disclosure documents of issuers across
Canada |
S-K
1300 |
Subpart
1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC |
S-K
1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary |
A
technical report summary for the Elk Creek Project that conforms to
S-K 1300 reporting standards and filed as Exhibit 96.1 to this
Annual Report on Form 10-K |
Smith
Credit Agreement |
A
non-revolving credit facility agreement with Mark Smith, dated
January 16, 2017, as amended, of which $2.0 million is outstanding
at June 30, 2022 and $0.7 million remains available for
borrowing. |
titanium
or Ti |
The
element titanium (atomic number 22), a transition metal which in
its oxide form is a common pigment in paper, paint, and plastic. In
its metallic form, titanium is used in aerospace applications,
armor, chemical processing applications, marine hardware
applications, medical implants, power generation, and in sporting
goods. |
TiO2 |
Titanium
dioxide, a commercial form of refined titanium |
TSF |
An
engineered and lined tailings storage facility constructed as a
permanent repository for wastes produced from mining and production
of niobium, scandium and titanium products |
TSX |
The
Toronto Stock Exchange |
U.S. |
The
United States of America |
USACE |
The
United States Army Corps of Engineers |
U.S.
GAAP |
United
States generally accepted accounting principles |
USGS |
The
United States Geological Service |
S-K 1300 Definitions
cut-off
grade |
The
grade (i.e., the concentration of metal or mineral in rock) that
determines the destination of the material during mining. For
purposes of establishing “prospects of economic extraction,” the
cut-off grade is the grade that distinguishes material deemed to
have no economic value (it will not be mined in underground mining
or if mined in surface mining, its destination will be the waste
dump) from material deemed to have economic value (its ultimate
destination during mining will be a processing facility). Other
terms used in similar fashion as cut-off grade include net smelter
return, pay limit, and break-even stripping ratio. |
development
stage issuer |
An
issuer that is engaged in the preparation of mineral reserves for
extraction on at least one material property |
development
stage property |
A
property that has mineral reserves disclosed, pursuant to
Regulation S-K 1300, but no material extraction |
economically
viable |
When
used in the context of mineral reserve determination, means that
the qualified person has determined, using a discounted cash flow
analysis, or has otherwise analytically determined, that extraction
of the mineral reserve is economically viable under reasonable
investment and market assumptions |
feasibility
study |
A
comprehensive technical and economic study of the selected
development option for a mineral project, which includes detailed
assessments of all applicable modifying factors, as defined under
S-K 1300, together with any other relevant operational factors, and
detailed financial analysis that are necessary to demonstrate, at
the time of reporting, that extraction is economically viable. The
results of the study may serve as the basis for a final decision by
a proponent or financial institution to proceed with, or finance,
the development of the project.
(1) A
feasibility study is more comprehensive, and with a higher degree
of accuracy, than a pre-feasibility study. It must contain mining,
infrastructure, and process designs completed with sufficient rigor
to serve as the basis for an investment decision or to support
project financing.
(2)
The confidence level in the results of a feasibility study is
higher than the confidence level in the results of a
pre-feasibility study. Terms such as full, final,
comprehensive, bankable, or definitive
feasibility study are equivalent to feasibility study.
|
indicated
mineral resource |
That
part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality
are estimated on the basis of adequate geological evidence and
sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with an
indicated mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified
person to apply modifying factors in sufficient detail to support
mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the
deposit. Because an indicated mineral resource has a lower level of
confidence than the level of confidence of a measured mineral
resource, an indicated mineral resource may only be converted to a
probable mineral reserve. |
inferred
mineral resource |
That
part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality
are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and
sampling. The level of geological uncertainty associated with an
inferred mineral resource is too high to apply relevant technical
and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic
extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability.
Because an inferred mineral resource has the lowest level of
geological confidence of all mineral resources, which prevents the
application of the modifying factors in a manner useful for
evaluation of economic viability, an inferred mineral resource may
not be considered when assessing the economic viability of a mining
project, and may not be converted to a mineral reserve. |
measured
mineral resource |
That
part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality
are estimated on the basis of conclusive geological evidence and
sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with a
measured mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person
to apply modifying factors, as defined in this section, in
sufficient detail to support detailed mine planning and final
evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because a
measured mineral resource has a higher level of confidence than
the level of confidence of either an indicated mineral resource or
an inferred mineral resource, a measured mineral resource may be
converted to a proven mineral reserve or to a probable mineral
reserve. |
mineral
reserve |
An
estimate of tonnage and grade or quality of indicated and measured
mineral resources that, in the opinion of the qualified person, can
be the basis of an economically viable project. More specifically,
it is the economically mineable part of a measured or indicated
mineral resource, which includes diluting materials and allowances
for losses that may occur when the material is mined or
extracted. |
mineral
resource |
A
concentration or occurrence of material of economic interest in or
on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade or quality, and quantity
that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. A
mineral resource is a reasonable estimate of mineralization, taking
into account relevant factors such as cut-off grade, likely mining
dimensions, location or continuity, that, with the assumed and
justifiable technical and economic conditions, is likely to, in
whole or in part, become economically extractable. It is not merely
an inventory of all mineralization drilled or sampled. |
modifying
factors |
The
factors that a qualified person must apply to indicated and
measured mineral resources and then evaluate in order to establish
the economic viability of mineral reserves. A qualified person must
apply and evaluate modifying factors to convert measured and
indicated mineral resources to proven and probable mineral
reserves. These factors include, but are not restricted to: mining;
processing; metallurgical; infrastructure; economic; marketing;
legal; environmental compliance; plans, negotiations, or agreements
with local individuals or groups; and governmental factors. The
number, type and specific characteristics of the modifying factors
applied will necessarily be a function of and depend upon the
mineral, mine, property, or project. |
probable
mineral reserve |
The
economically mineable part of an indicated and, in some cases, a
measured mineral resource |
production
stage issuer |
An
issuer that is engaged in material extraction of mineral reserves
on at least one material property |
production
stage property |
A
property with material extraction of mineral reserves |
proven
mineral reserve |
The
economically mineable part of a measured mineral resource and can
only result from conversion of a measured mineral
resource |
qualified
person |
An
individual who is:
(1) A
mineral industry professional with at least five years of relevant
experience in the type of mineralization and type of deposit under
consideration and in the specific type of activity that person is
undertaking on behalf of the registrant; and
|
|
(2) An
eligible member or licensee in good standing of a recognized
professional organization at the time the technical report is
prepared. For an organization to be a recognized professional
organization, it must:
(i)
Be either:
(A)
An organization recognized within the mining industry as a
reputable professional association; or
(B) A
board authorized by U.S. federal, state or foreign statute to
regulate professionals in the mining, geoscience or related
field;
(ii)
Admit eligible members primarily on the basis of their
academic qualifications and experience;
(iii)
Establish and require compliance with professional standards of
competence and ethics;
(iv) Require
or encourage continuing professional development;
(v)
Have and apply disciplinary powers, including the power
to suspend or expel a member regardless of where the member
practices or resides; and
(vi)
Provide a public list of members in good
standing.
|
relevant
experience |
For
purposes of determining whether a party is a qualified person, that
the party has experience in the specific type of activity that the
person is undertaking on behalf of the registrant. If the qualified
person is preparing or supervising the preparation of a technical
report concerning exploration results, the relevant experience must
be in exploration. If the qualified person is estimating, or
supervising the estimation of mineral resources, the relevant
experience must be in the estimation, assessment and evaluation of
mineral resources and associated technical and economic factors
likely to influence the prospect of economic extraction. If the
qualified person is estimating, or supervising the estimation of
mineral reserves, the relevant experience must be in engineering
and other disciplines required for the estimation, assessment,
evaluation and economic extraction of mineral reserves.
(1) Relevant
experience also means, for purposes of determining whether a party
is a qualified person, that the party has experience evaluating the
specific type of mineral deposit under consideration (e.g., coal,
metal, base metal, industrial mineral, or mineral brine). The type
of experience necessary to qualify as relevant is a facts and
circumstances determination. For example, experience in a
high-nugget, vein-type mineralization such as tin or tungsten would
likely be relevant experience for estimating mineral resources for
vein-gold mineralization, whereas experience in a low grade
disseminated gold deposit likely would not be relevant.
Note
1 to Paragraph (1) of the Definition of Relevant Experience: It
is not always necessary for a person to have five years’ experience
in each and every type of deposit in order to be an eligible
qualified person if that person has relevant experience in similar
deposit types. For example, a person with 20 years’ experience in
estimating mineral resources for a variety of metalliferous
hard-rock deposit types may not require as much as five years of
specific experience in porphyry-copper deposits to act as a
qualified person. Relevant experience in the other deposit types
could count towards the experience in relation to porphyry-copper
deposits.
|
|
(2)
For a qualified person providing a technical report for exploration
results or mineral resource estimates, relevant experience also
requires, in addition to experience in the type of mineralization,
sufficient experience with the sampling and analytical techniques,
as well as extraction and processing techniques, relevant to the
mineral deposit under consideration. Sufficient experience means
that level of experience necessary to be able to identify, with
substantial confidence, problems that could affect the reliability
of data and issues associated with processing.
(3)
For a qualified person applying the modifying factors, as defined
by this section, to convert mineral resources to mineral reserves,
relevant experience also requires:
(i) Sufficient
knowledge and experience in the application of these factors to the
mineral deposit under consideration; and
(ii) Experience
with the geology, geostatistics, mining, extraction and processing
that is applicable to the type of mineral and mining under
consideration.
|
Metric Equivalents
For
ease of reference, the following factors for converting Imperial
measurements into metric equivalents are provided:
To
convert from Imperial
|
To
metric
|
Multiply
by
|
Acres |
Hectares |
0.4047 |
Feet
(“ft”) |
Meters
(“m”) |
0.3048 |
Miles |
Kilometers
(“km”) |
1.6093 |
Tons |
Tonnes
(“t”) |
0.9072 |
1
mile = 1.6093 kilometers |
1
acre = 0.4047 hectares |
2,204.62
pounds = 1 metric tonne = 1 tonne |
2000
pounds (1 short ton) = 0.9072 tonnes |
Mineral
Reserves and Resources
Information
concerning our mining property in this Annual Report on Form
10-K has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of
S-K 1300, which first became applicable to us for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2022. All mineral resource and mineral reserve
estimates included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been
prepared in accordance with S-K 1300. Previously, we prepared our
estimates of mineral resources and mineral reserves following only
NI 43-101 and CIM. The 2022 NI 43-101 Elk Creek Technical
Report and S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary, filed as
Exhibit 96.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are based on the
2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study and are substantively identical to
one another except for internal references to the regulations under
which the report is made, and certain organizational differences.
In addition, S-K 1300 requires us to disclose our mineral
resources, in addition to our mineral reserves, as of the end of
our most recently completed fiscal year. You are cautioned that
mineral resources are subject to further exploration and
development and are subject to additional risks and no assurance
can be given that they will eventually convert to future reserves.
Inferred resources, in particular, have a great amount of
uncertainty as to their existence and their economic and legal
feasibility. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or
all of the inferred resource exists or is economically or legally
mineable. See Item 1A, Risk Factors.
Currency and Exchange Rates
All
dollar amounts in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are expressed in
U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. The Company’s accounts are
maintained in U.S. dollars and the Company’s financial statements
are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Some of the Company’s
material agreements use Canadian dollars and the Company’s Common
Shares, as traded on the TSX, are traded in Canadian dollars. As
used herein, “C$” represents Canadian dollars.
The
following table sets forth the rate of exchange for the Canadian
dollar, expressed in U.S. dollars in effect at the end of the
periods indicated, the average of exchange rates in effect during
such periods, and the high and low exchange rates during such
periods based on the daily rate of exchange as reported by the Bank
of Canada for conversion of Canadian dollars into U.S.
dollars.
|
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30,
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
Canadian
Dollars to U.S. Dollars |
|
|
Rate
at end of period |
0.7760 |
0.8068 |
0.7338 |
Average
rate for period |
0.7900 |
0.7807 |
0.7453 |
High
for period |
0.8111 |
0.8306 |
0.7710 |
Low
for period |
0.7669 |
0.7344 |
0.6898 |
PART I
Introduction
NioCorp
was incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia
under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) on February
27, 1987, under the name “IPC International Prospector Corp.” On
May 22, 1991, we changed our name to “Kingston Resources Ltd.”
On June 29, 2001, we changed our name to “Butler Developments
Corp.” On February 12, 2009, we changed our name to “Butler
Resource Corp.” On March 4, 2010, we changed our name to
“Quantum Rare Earth Developments Corp.” On March 4, 2013, we
changed our name to “NioCorp Developments Ltd.”
NioCorp
is a reporting issuer in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan,
Ontario, and New Brunswick. Our registered and records office is
located at 595 Burrard Street, Suite 2600, Vancouver, British
Columbia V7X 1L3 (ATTN: Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP). Our
principal executive office is located at 7000 South Yosemite
Street, Suite 115, Centennial, Colorado 80112.
Historical Development of the Business
During
2009 and 2010, the Company commenced mineral exploration activities
in the Elk Creek, Nebraska area, including negotiations with local
landowners for land access agreements. The acquisition of the Elk
Creek Property was closed in December 2010 and involved the
purchase of all of the issued and outstanding common shares of
0859404 BC Ltd., a private British Columbia company, which in turn
held 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of ECRC and was
signatory to the option agreements covering the Elk Creek Property
area. A new Canadian company, 0886338 BC Ltd. was formed to merge
with 0859404 BC Ltd., and this merged entity was subsequently
amalgamated into 0896800.
The
Company commenced a field exploration program in 2011, which
included verification of previous work which was completed on the
Elk Creek Property in the 1970s and 1980s, re-assaying of historic
drill core, an airborne geophysical survey and the completion of
five new diamond drillholes. The available data for the Elk Creek
Property was compiled into an updated NI 43-101 resource estimate
for the Elk Creek Project, which was issued in April 2012.
Additional drilling and NI 43-101 technical reports, including
resource updates and preliminary economic assessments, were
completed and issued by the Company in 2014 and 2015.
During
fiscal years 2016 and 2017, the Company focused on feasibility
study development, and on June 30, 2017, we announced the
completion of a NI 43-101 technical report for the Elk Creek
Project (the “2017 NI 43-101 Elk Creek Technical Report”). In
connection with a review by the Ontario Securities and Exchange
Commission, on December 15, 2017, the Company filed a revised 2017
NI 43-101 Elk Creek Technical Report. This revised report contained
no changes to any previously reported numbers or forecasted
economic returns of the Elk Creek Project from those contained in
the originally filed 2017 NI 43-101 Elk Creek Technical
Report.
During
fiscal year 2019, we received a new mine design based on detailed
underground engineering conducted by Nordmin. On April 16, 2019, we
announced the results of the updated underground mine design and
supporting infrastructure, the results of an update to the Elk
Creek Project, and the 2019 NI 43-101 Elk Creek Technical Report
based on the new mine design. During fiscal year 2020, the Company
focused efforts on advancing detailed engineering of the surface
and underground facilities and negotiating the follow-on contracts
associated with the planned construction of the surface and
underground features of the project, as well as obtaining the Air
Permit. The Air Permit required the completion of an air quality
model that demonstrates compliance with the NAAQS. The final Air
Permit was issued by the State of Nebraska on June 2, 2020, for the
Elk Creek Project.
During
fiscal year 2021, we obtained funding which allowed us to purchase
land and mineral rights at the Elk Creek Property and continue
early project execution activities. With the acquisition of the
land and mineral rights, the Company now owns the surface land on
which the Elk Creek Project’s mine infrastructure and supporting
operations will be located once sufficient project financing is
obtained, along with ownership of the mineral rights to more than
90% of the Elk Creek Project’s mineral resources and mineral
reserves.
During
fiscal year 2022, we focused efforts towards refining our Elk Creek
Project mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates. This work
included additional assays of historical drill core to fill data
gaps in the existing resource database and re-modeling of the Elk
Creek Project to include REEs. Based on this re-interpretation of
the geologic data, an update to the mine plan was also completed.
Accordingly of this work, we issued the 2022 NI 43-101 Elk Creek
Technical Report on June 28, 2022. Finally, to comply with the
regulations under S-K 1300, we are filing the S-K 1300 Elk Creek
Technical Report Summary as an exhibit to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
During fiscal year 2022 we also advanced our efforts to optimize
our process design to contemplate the recovery and production of
REEs, including completion of bench and pilot scale testing on
elements of the current metallurgical flowsheet as well as
illustrating that NioCorp can recover and produce high purity,
fully separated magnetic rare earth products, such as
neodymium-praseodymium oxide, dysprosium oxide, and terbium oxide
in addition to the niobium, scandium, and titanium products already
planned for production by the Company, once Project financing is
secured and additional work has been completed on the technical and
economic feasibility of adding REEs to the Elk Creek Projects’
existing planned product suite. Following the success of this
testing, the Company advanced the construction of a
demonstration-scale test plant (the “Demonstration Plant”) located
in Trois-Rivières, Quebec. Construction of the Demonstration Plant
encountered supply chain delays which negatively impacted our
estimation of the completion date; however, as of September 6,
2022, construction of the Demonstration Plant was substantially
completed, and commissioning has been initiated. The Demonstration
Plant is expected to confirm the results of the bench and pilot
scale testing noted above, as well as provide updated recovery
percentages for the niobium, scandium, titanium and REEs we intend
to produce. The Demonstration Plant results would then be used to
finalize the design of the optimized production plant for the Elk
Creek Project along with demonstrating potential metallurgical
recoveries for the prospective magnetic rare earth products.
Information
regarding the Elk Creek Project is discussed below under Item 2.,
“Properties.”
Emerging Growth Company Status
Prior
to June 30, 2022, we qualified as an “emerging growth company” as
defined in Section 101 of the United States Jumpstart Our Business
Startups Act of 2012. We lost our status as an emerging growth
company as of June 30, 2022, and are now subject to Section 14A(a)
and (b) of the Exchange Act beginning with our fiscal year starting
July 1, 2022. However, notwithstanding the loss of our status as an
emerging growth company, we will continue to be exempt from Section
404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for so long as we are
neither a “large accelerated filer” nor an “accelerated filer” as
those terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange
Act.
Corporate Structure
The
Company’s business operations are conducted primarily through ECRC.
The table below provides an overview of the Company’s current
subsidiaries and their activities.
Name
|
State/Province
of Formation
|
Ownership
|
Business
|
0896800
B.C. Ltd. |
British
Columbia |
100%
by the Company |
The
only business of 0896800 is to hold the shares of ECRC |
Elk
Creek Resources Corp. |
Nebraska |
100%
by 0896800 |
The
business of ECRC is the development of the Elk Creek
Project |
Business Operations
NioCorp
is a mineral exploration company engaged in the acquisition,
exploration, and development of mineral properties. NioCorp,
through ECRC, is developing a superalloy materials project that, if
and when developed, will produce niobium, scandium, and titanium
products. Known as the “Elk Creek Project,” it is located near Elk
Creek, Nebraska, in the southeast portion of the state.
|
● |
Niobium
is used to produce various superalloys that are extensively used in
high performance aircraft and jet turbines. It also is used in HSLA
steel, a stronger steel used in automobiles, bridges, structural
systems, buildings, pipelines, and other applications that
generally enables those applications to be stronger and lighter in
mass. This “lightweighting” benefit often results in environmental
benefits, including reduced fuel consumption and material usage,
which can result in fewer air emissions. |
|
● |
Scandium
can be combined with aluminum to make super-high-performance alloys
with increased strength and improved corrosion resistance. Scandium
also is a critical component of advanced solid oxide fuel cells, an
environmentally preferred technology for high-reliability,
distributed electricity generation. |
|
● |
Titanium
is a component of various superalloys and other applications that
are used for aerospace applications, weapons systems, protective
armor, medical implants and many others. It also is used in
pigments for paper, paint, and plastics. |
During
fiscal year 2022, the Company also advanced work on the
determination of the economic potential of expanding its currently
planned product suite from the Elk Creek Project to include
REEs.
Our
primary business strategy is to advance our Elk Creek Project to
commercial production. We are focused on obtaining additional funds
to carry out our near-term planned work programs associated with
securing the project financing necessary to complete mine
development and construction of the Elk Creek Project.
Competitive Business Conditions
There
is aggressive competition within the minerals industry to discover
and acquire mineral properties considered to have commercial
potential. We compete for the opportunity to participate in
promising exploration projects with other entities. In addition, we
compete with others in efforts to obtain financing to acquire and
explore mineral properties, acquire and utilize mineral exploration
equipment, and hire qualified mineral exploration personnel. We may
compete with other mining companies for mining claims in regions
adjacent to our existing claims, or in other parts of the world
should we dedicate resources to doing so in the future. These
companies may be better capitalized than us and we may have
difficulty in expanding our holdings through the staking or
acquisition of additional mining claims or other mineral
tenures.
In
competing for qualified mineral exploration personnel, we may be
required to pay compensation or benefits relatively higher than
those paid in the past, and the availability of qualified personnel
may be limited in high-demand mining periods, such as was the case
in past years when the price of gold and other metals was higher
than it is now.
Cycles
The
mining business is subject to mineral price cycles. The
marketability of minerals and mineral concentrates is also affected
by worldwide economic cycles. At the present time, strong demand
for some minerals in many countries is lifting commodity prices,
although it is difficult to assess how long such trends may
continue. Fluctuations in supply and demand in various regions
throughout the world are common.
The
following table sets forth commodity prices for the last five
calendar years for the ferroniobium, scandium trioxide and titanium
dioxide products the Company anticipates extracting from its Elk
Creek Project. These pricing surveys may not be representative of
the pricing that the Company anticipates achieving for its products
once commercial production begins from its Elk Creek
Project.
Year
|
Ferroniobium
U.S.
Price ($/kg-Nb)(1)
|
Sc2O3
U.S.
Price ($/kg)(2)
|
TiO2
U.S.
Price ($/kg)(3)
|
2021 |
$44 |
$2,200 |
$1.50 |
2020 |
37 |
3,800 |
1.18 |
2019 |
39 |
3,900 |
1.13 |
2018 |
38 |
4,600 |
1.03 |
2017 |
37 |
4,600 |
0.74 |
|
(1) |
Source:
Argus Metal Prices, average annual ending price, 2021. Ferroniobium
65% niobium content, FOB U.S. warehouse. |
|
(2) |
Source:
USGS Mineral Commodity Summary, 2022. Sc2O3,
99.99% purity, 5-kilogram (“kg”) lot size. |
|
(3) |
Source:
USGS Mineral Commodity Summary, 2022. Rutile mineral concentrate,
bulk, minimum 95% TiO2, f.o.b. Australia. |
As
NioCorp is a development stage issuer and has not yet generated any
revenue from the operation of the Elk Creek Project, it is not
currently significantly affected by changes in commodity demand and
prices, except to the extent that same impact the availability of
capital for mineral exploration and development projects. As it
does not carry on production activities, NioCorp’s ability to fund
ongoing exploration is affected by the availability of financing,
which is, in turn, affected by the strength of the economy and
other general economic factors.
Economic Dependence
Other
than land and mineral right option agreements and the offtake
agreements, NioCorp’s business is not substantially dependent on
any contract such as a contract to sell the major part of its
product or services or to purchase the major part of its
requirements for goods, services or its raw materials, or any
franchise or license or other agreement to use a patent, formula,
trade secret, process or trade name upon which its business
depends.
Government Regulation
The
exploration and development of a mining prospect is subject to
regulation by a number of federal and state government authorities.
These include the EPA and the USACE as well as the various state
and local environmental protection agencies. The regulations
address many environmental issues relating to air, soil, and water
contamination, and apply to many mining related activities
including exploration, mine construction, mineral extraction, ore
milling, water use, waste disposal, and use of toxic substances. In
addition, we are subject to regulations relating to labor
standards, occupational health and safety, mine safety, general
land use, export of minerals, and taxation. Many of the regulations
require permits or licenses to be obtained, the absence of which
and/or inability to obtain such permits or licenses will adversely
affect our ability to conduct our exploration, development, and
operation activities. The failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of permits and licenses may result in fines or other
penalties or in revocation of a permit or license or loss of a
prospect.
General
While
none of the lands on which the Elk Creek Project is proposed to be
built are owned by the U.S. Government, mining rights are governed
by the General Mining Law of 1872, as amended, which allows for the
location of mining claims on certain federal lands upon the
discovery of a valuable mineral deposit and compliance with
location requirements. The exploration of mining properties and
development and operation of mines is governed by both federal and
state laws. Federal laws that govern mining claim location and
maintenance and mining operations on federal lands are generally
administered by the Bureau of Land Management. Additional federal
laws, governing mine safety and health, also apply. State laws also
require various permits and approvals before exploration,
development or production operations can begin. Among other things,
a reclamation plan must typically be prepared and approved, with
financial assurance provided in the amount of projected reclamation
costs. The financial assurance is used to ensure that proper
reclamation takes place and will not be released until that time.
Local jurisdictions may also impose permitting requirements, such
as conditional use permits or zoning approvals.
Environmental
Regulation
Our
mineral projects are subject to various federal, state and local
laws and regulations governing protection of the environment. These
laws are continually changing and, in general, are becoming more
restrictive. The development, operation, closure, and reclamation
of mining projects in the U.S. requires numerous notifications,
permits, authorizations, and public agency decisions. Compliance
with environmental and related laws and regulations requires us to
obtain permits issued by regulatory agencies and to file various
reports and keep records of our operations. Certain of these
permits require periodic renewal or review of their conditions and
may be subject to a public review process during which opposition
to our proposed operations may be encountered. We are currently
operating under various permits for activities connected to mineral
exploration, reclamation, and environmental considerations. Our
policy is to conduct business in a way that safeguards public
health and the environment. We believe that our operations are
conducted in material compliance with applicable laws and
regulations.
Changes
to current local, state, or federal laws and regulations in the
jurisdictions where we operate could require additional capital
expenditures and increased operating and/or reclamation costs.
Although we are unable to predict what additional legislation, if
any, might be proposed or enacted, additional regulatory
requirements could impact the economics of our projects.
Environmental
Regulation - U.S. Federal Laws
The
Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (“CERCLA”), and comparable state statutes, impose strict,
joint, and several liability on current and former owners and
operators of sites and on persons who disposed of or arranged for
the disposal of hazardous substances found at such sites. It is not
uncommon for the government to file claims requiring clean-up
actions and/or demands for reimbursement for government-incurred
clean-up costs or natural resource damages. It is also not uncommon
for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims
for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by
hazardous substances released into the environment. The Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), and comparable state
statutes, govern the disposal of solid waste and hazardous waste
and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for
noncompliance, as well as requirements for corrective actions.
CERCLA, RCRA, and comparable state statutes can impose liability
for clean-up of sites and disposal of substances found on
exploration, mining and processing sites long after activities on
such sites have been completed.
The
Clean Air Act, as amended (“CAA”), restricts the emission of air
pollutants from many sources, including mining and processing
activities. Any future mining operations by the Company may produce
air emissions, including fugitive dust and other air pollutants
from stationary equipment, storage facilities, and the use of
mobile sources such as trucks and heavy construction equipment,
which are subject to review, monitoring and/or control requirements
under the CAA and state air quality laws. New facilities may be
required to obtain permits before work can begin, and existing
facilities may be required to incur capital costs in order to
remain in compliance. In addition, permitting rules may impose
limitations on our production levels or result in additional
capital expenditures in order to comply with the rules.
The
National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) requires federal
agencies to integrate environmental considerations into their
decision-making processes by evaluating the environmental impacts
of their proposed actions, including issuance of permits to mining
facilities and assessing alternatives to those actions. If a
proposed action could significantly affect the environment, the
agency must prepare either a detailed statement known as an
Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”), or a less detailed
statement known as an Environmental Assessment (“EA”). The EPA,
other federal agencies, and any interested third parties can review
and comment on the scope of the EIS or EA and the adequacy of any
findings set forth in the draft and final EIS or EA. This process
can cause delays in issuance of required permits or result in
changes to a project to mitigate its potential environmental
impacts, which can in turn impact the economic feasibility of a
proposed project.
The
Clean Water Act (“CWA”), and comparable state statutes, impose
restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants into
waters of the U.S. The discharge of pollutants into regulated
waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the terms of a
permit issued by the EPA or an analogous state agency. The CWA
regulates storm water from mining facilities and requires a storm
water discharge permit or Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan for
certain activities. Such a permit requires the regulated facility
to monitor and sample storm water run-off from its operations. The
CWA and regulations implemented thereunder also prohibit discharges
of dredged and fill material in wetlands and other waters of the
U.S. unless authorized by an appropriately issued permit. The CWA
and comparable state statutes provide for civil, criminal, and
administrative penalties for unauthorized discharges of pollutants,
and impose liability on parties responsible for those discharges
for the costs of cleaning up any environmental damage caused by the
release and for natural resource damages resulting from the
release.
The
Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”) and the Underground Injection
Control (“UIC”) program promulgated thereunder, regulate the
drilling and operation of subsurface injection wells. The EPA
directly administers the UIC program in some states and in others
the responsibility for the program has been delegated to the state.
The program requires that a permit be obtained before drilling a
disposal or injection well. Violation of these regulations and/or
contamination of groundwater by mining-related activities may
result in fines, penalties, and remediation costs, among other
sanctions and liabilities under the SDWA and state laws. In
addition, third-party claims may be filed by landowners and other
parties claiming damages for alternative water supplies, property
damages, and bodily injury.
Environmental
Regulation − Nebraska
Nebraska
has a well-developed set of environmental regulations and
responsible agencies but does not have clearly defined regulations
with respect to permitting mines. As such, review of the project
and the issuance of permits by Nebraska agencies and regulatory
bodies could potentially impact the total time to market for our
Elk Creek Project. Other Nebraska regulations govern operating and
design standards for the construction and operation of any source
of air emissions and landfill operations. Any changes to these laws
and regulations could have an adverse impact on our financial
performance and results of operations by, for example, requiring
changes to operating conditions, technical criteria, fees, or
surety requirements. The most stringent permit related to air
quality is known as a Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(“PSD”) Permit, which requires the applicant to demonstrate
compliance with NAAQS and Best Available Control Technology
(“BACT”) for the control of air emissions. If the facility exceeds
the potential to emit thresholds for such a permit and is thus
subject to PSD requirements, permanent construction at the project
site may not begin until the responsible agency issues the PSD
Permit. For facilities in Nebraska with potential emissions below
PSD thresholds, a state air construction permit is needed. The
state permit also requires a demonstration of compliance with NAAQS
but does not require a BACT demonstration and further allows
construction at a subject facility to proceed ahead of permit
issuance through an established variance process.
Human Capital
The
Company’s ability to continue to progress the Elk Creek Project
will depend on its ability to attract and retain individuals with
(among other skills) financial, administrative, engineering,
geological and mining skills, and knowledge of our industry and
targeted markets. Much of the necessary specialized skills and
knowledge required by the Company as a mineral exploration company
are available from the Company’s current management team and Board
of Directors. The Company retains outside consultants if additional
specialized skills and knowledge are required.
As of
June 30, 2022, we had eight full-time employees as well as one
contract employee. In addition, we use consultants with specific
skills to assist with various aspects of our corporate affairs,
project evaluation, due diligence, corporate governance and
property management.
Our
compensation programs are designed to align compensation of our
employees with the Company’s performance and to provide the proper
incentives to attract, retain and motivate employees to achieve
superior results. The structure of our compensation programs
balances competitive wages and benefits and incentive earnings for
both short-term and long-term performance.
Our
priority to maintain a culture of ethical performance as a core
value is reflected in the Company’s Code of Conduct (as defined
below) and other related policies. Oversight is provided by the
Company’s Board of Directors and, for specific areas of
performance, by committees of the Board of Directors. Employees are
required to review the Code of Conduct on a periodic basis. Our
compensation programs also include consideration of ethical
performance in determining incentive awards.
The
Company also provides a robust suite of benefits to our employees,
including 401(k) participation, medical-insurance options, and
programs to encourage and support the whole person.
Forward-Looking Statements
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K and the exhibits attached hereto contain
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), and “forward-looking information” within the
meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation
(collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Such forward-looking
statements concern our anticipated results and developments in the
operations of the Company in future periods, planned exploration
activities, the adequacy of the Company’s financial resources, and
other events or conditions that may occur in the future.
Forward-looking
statements have been based upon our current business and operating
plans, as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors; our cash
and other funding requirements and timing and sources thereof;
results of feasibility studies; the accuracy of mineral resource
and reserve estimates and assumptions on which they are based; the
results of economic assessments and exploration activities; and
current market conditions and project development plans. The
material assumptions used to develop the forward-looking statements
and forward-looking information included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K include: our expectations of mineral prices; our
forecasts and expected cash flows; our projected capital and
operating costs; accuracy of mineral resource estimates and
resource modeling and feasibility study results; expectations
regarding mining and metallurgical recoveries; timing and
reliability of sampling and assay data; anticipated political and
social conditions; expected national and local government policies,
including legal reforms; successful advancement of the Company’s
required permitting processes; and the ability to successfully
raise additional capital.
Forward-looking
statements are frequently, but not always, identified by words such
as “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,”
“potential,” “possible,” and similar expressions, or statements
that events, conditions, or results “will,” “may,” “could,” or
“should” (or the negative and grammatical variations of any of
these terms) occur or be achieved. Any statements that express or
involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations,
beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, or future
events or performance (often, but not always, using words or
phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect,” “is expected,”
“anticipates” or “does not anticipate,” “plans,” “estimates,” or
“intends,” or stating that certain actions, events, or results
“may,” “could,” “would,” “might,” or “will” be taken, occur or be
achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be
forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements reflect
the Company’s current views with respect to future events and are
subject to certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and
assumptions. Many factors could cause actual results, performance,
or achievements to be materially different from any future results,
performance, or achievements that may be expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements, including, among others, risks
related to the following:
Risks
Related to Our Business:
|
● |
risks
related to our ability to operate as a going concern; |
|
● |
risks
related to our requirement of significant additional
capital; |
|
● |
risks
related to our limited operating history; |
|
● |
risks
related to our history of losses; |
|
● |
risks
related to cost increases for our exploration and, if warranted,
development projects; |
|
● |
risks
related to a disruption in, or failure of, our information
technology (“IT”) systems, including those related to
cybersecurity; |
|
● |
risks
related to equipment and supply shortages; |
|
● |
risks
related to current and future offtake agreements, joint ventures,
and partnerships; |
|
● |
risks
related to our ability to attract qualified management; |
|
● |
risks
related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic or other global
health crises on our business plans, financial condition and
liquidity; and |
|
● |
risks
related to the ability to enforce judgment against certain of our
directors. |
Risks
Related to Mining and Exploration:
|
● |
risks
related to estimates of mineral resources and reserves; |
|
● |
risks
related to mineral exploration and production
activities; |
|
● |
risks
related to our lack of mineral production from our
properties; |
|
● |
risks
related to the results of our metallurgical testing; |
|
● |
risks
related to the price volatility of commodities; |
|
● |
risks
related to the establishment of a reserve and resource for REEs and
the development of a viable recovery process for REEs; |
|
● |
risks
related to the estimation of mineral resources and mineral
reserves; |
|
● |
risks
related to changes in mineral resource and reserve
estimates; |
|
● |
risks
related to competition in the mining industry; |
|
● |
risks
related to the management of the water balance at our Elk Creek
Project; |
|
● |
risks
related to claims on the title to our properties; |
|
● |
risks
related to potential future litigation; and |
|
● |
risks
related to our lack of insurance covering all our
operations. |
Risks
Related to Government Regulations:
|
● |
risks
related to our ability to obtain or renew permits and licenses for
production; |
|
● |
risks
related to government and environmental regulations that may
increase our costs of doing business or restrict our
operations; |
|
● |
risks
related to changes in federal and/or state laws that may
significantly affect the mining industry; |
|
● |
risks
related to the impacts of climate change, as well as actions taken
or required by governments related to strengthening resilience in
the face of potential impacts from climate change; and |
|
● |
risks
related to land reclamation requirements. |
Risks
Related to Our Debt:
|
● |
risks
related to covenants contained in agreements with our secured
creditors that may affect our assets; and |
|
● |
risks
related to the extent to which our level of indebtedness may impair
our ability to obtain additional financing. |
Risks
Related to Our Common Shares:
|
● |
risks
related to qualifying as a “passive foreign investment company”
under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended;
and |
|
● |
risks
related to our Common Shares, including price volatility, lack of
dividend payments, dilution and penny stock rules. |
This
list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect our
forward-looking statements. Some of the important risks and
uncertainties that could affect forward-looking statements are
described further under the Item 1A., – “Risk Factors,” below.
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or
should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may
vary materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated, or
expected. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any
such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date
made. We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after
the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of
anticipated or unanticipated events, except as required by
law.
Available Information
We
maintain a website at http://www.niocorp.com. Our Common Shares are
currently registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, and
we are currently required to file reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q or
8-K. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K (which includes our audited
financial statements), Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current
Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed or furnished
pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are
available on our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file such reports with, or
furnish those reports to, the SEC. The SEC maintains an internet
site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and
other information regarding issuers that file electronically with
the SEC (http://www.sec.gov). We do not intend to send security
holders a printed version of our Annual Report as it will be
available online.
We
maintain a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors,
Officers and Employees (“Code of Conduct”). A copy of our Code of
Conduct may be found on our website in the “About Us” section under
the main title “Corporate Governance.” Our Code of Conduct contains
information regarding whistleblower procedures.
We
are not including the information contained on or accessible
through our website or the SEC’s website as a part of, or
incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
Our
business activities are subject to significant risks, including
those described below. You should carefully consider these risks.
If any of the described risks actually occurs, our business,
financial position and results of operations could be materially
adversely affected. Such risks are not the only ones we face, and
additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or
that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business.
This report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks
and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from
those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of
a number of factors, including the risks described below. See
“Forward-Looking Statements” under Item 1.,
“Business.”
Risks Related to Our Business
Our
ability to operate as a going concern is in doubt.
The
notes that accompany our financial statements for the year ended
June 30, 2022, disclose that substantial doubt exists as to our
ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared
under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern. We
are a development stage issuer and we have incurred losses since
our inception.
We
currently have no historical recurring source of revenue and our
ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability
to raise capital to fund our future exploration and working capital
requirements or our ability to profitably execute our business
plan. Our plans for the long-term return to and continuation as a
going concern include financing our future operations through sales
of our Common Shares and/or debt and the potential profitable
exploitation of our Elk Creek Project. Additionally, capital
markets and general economic conditions in the U.S. and Canada may
impose significant obstacles to raising the required funds. As
discussed further below, while we have been successful in doing so
in the past, there can be no assurance we will be able to raise
funds in the future. These factors raise substantial doubt about
our ability to continue as a going concern.
We
will require significant additional capital to fund our business
plan.
We
will be required to expend significant funds to develop our
existing properties and to identify and acquire additional
properties to diversify our property portfolio. We anticipate that
we will be required to make substantial capital expenditures for
the development of our Elk Creek Project.
As of
June 30, 2022, the Company had cash of $5.3 million and working
capital of $2.0 million, compared to cash of $7.3 million and
working capital of $3.4 million on June 30, 2021.
As of
June 30, 2022, the Company’s current planned operational needs are
approximately $9.5 million through the end of fiscal 2023. From the
date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company anticipates
that it does not have sufficient cash to continue to fund basic
operations for the next twelve months. This includes general
overhead costs, expected costs relating to securing financing
necessary for the Elk Creek Project, satisfying outstanding
accounts payable, and potential retirement of our short-term debt
obligations. Access to additional funds will be utilized to fund
basic operations as well as to further advance the Elk Creek
Project through substantive near-term milestones.
We
are actively pursuing such additional sources of debt and equity
financing, and while we have been successful in doing so in the
past, there can be no assurance we will be able to do so in the
future.
Our
ability to obtain necessary funding for these purposes, in turn,
depends upon a number of factors, including the status of the
national and worldwide economy and the price of the products we
intend to produce. We may not be successful in obtaining the
required financing or, if we can obtain such financing, such
financing may not be on terms that are favorable to us.
Our
inability to access sufficient capital for our operations could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results
of operations, or prospects. Sales of substantial amounts of
securities may have a highly dilutive effect on our ownership or
share structure. Sales of a large number of Common Shares in the
public markets, or the potential for such sales, could decrease the
trading price of the Common Shares and could impair our ability to
raise capital through future sales of Common Shares. We have not
yet commenced commercial production at any of our properties and,
as such, have not generated positive cash flows to date and have no
reasonable prospects of doing so unless successful commercial
production can be achieved at our Elk Creek Project. We expect to
continue to incur negative investing and operating cash flows until
such time as we enter into successful commercial production. This
will require us to deploy our working capital to fund such negative
cash flow and to seek additional sources of financing. There is no
assurance that any such financing sources will be available or
sufficient to meet our requirements. There is no assurance that we
will be able to continue to raise equity capital or to secure
additional debt financing, or that we will not continue to incur
losses.
We
have a limited operating history on which to base an evaluation of
our business and prospects.
Since
our inception, we have had no revenue from operations. We have no
history of producing products from any of our properties. Our Elk
Creek Project is a development stage property. Advancing our Elk
Creek Project from a development stage property to a production
stage property will require significant capital and time, and
successful commercial production from the Elk Creek Property will
be subject to permitting and construction of the mine, processing
plants, roads, and other related works and infrastructure. As a
result, we are subject to all of the risks associated with
developing and establishing new mining operations and business
enterprises including:
|
● |
the
timing and cost, which can be considerable, of further exploration,
preparing feasibility studies, permitting, engineering and
construction of infrastructure, mining, and processing
facilities; |
|
● |
the
availability and costs of drilling equipment, exploration
personnel, skilled labor, and mining and processing equipment, if
required; |
|
● |
the
availability and cost of appropriate smelting and/or refining
arrangements, if required; |
|
● |
compliance
with environmental and other governmental approval and permit
requirements; |
|
● |
the
availability of funds to finance exploration, development,
permitting, and construction activities, as warranted; |
|
● |
potential
opposition from non-governmental organizations, local groups, or
local residents that may delay or prevent development
activities; |
|
● |
potential
increases in exploration, construction, and operating costs due to
changes in the cost of fuel, power, materials, and supplies;
and |
|
● |
potential
shortages of mining, mineral processing, hydrometallurgical,
pyrometallurgical, construction, and other facilities-related
supplies. |
The
costs, timing, and complexities of exploration, development,
engineering and construction activities may be increased by the
location of our properties and competition from other mineral
exploration and mining companies. It is common for exploration
companies to experience unexpected problems and delays during
development, if commenced, including engineering, procurement,
construction, commissioning and ramp-up. Accordingly, our
activities may not result in profitable operations and we may not
succeed in establishing operations or profitably producing products
at any of our current or future properties, including our Elk Creek
Project.
We
have a history of losses and expect to continue to incur losses in
the future.
We
have incurred losses since inception, have negative cash flow from
operating activities, and expect to continue to incur losses in the
future. We incurred the following losses from operations during
each of the following periods:
|
● |
$9,929
for the year ended June 30, 2022; |
|
● |
$4,390
for the year ended June 30, 2021; and |
|
● |
$4,001
for the year ended June 30, 2020. |
We
expect to continue to incur losses unless and until such time as
one of our properties enters into commercial production and
generates sufficient revenues to fund continuing operations. We
recognize that if we are unable to generate significant revenues
from operations and dispositions of our properties, we will not be
able to earn profits or continue operations. At this early stage of
our operation, we also expect to face the risks, uncertainties,
expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered by companies at
the start-up stage of their business development. We cannot be sure
that we will be successful in addressing these risks and
uncertainties and our failure to do so could have a materially
adverse effect on our financial condition.
Increased
costs could affect our financial condition.
We
anticipate that costs at our projects that we may explore or
develop will frequently be subject to variation from one year to
the next due to a number of factors, such as changing ore grade,
metallurgical performance, and revisions to mine plans, if any, in
response to the physical shape and location of the ore body. In
addition, costs are affected by the price of commodities such as
fuel, steel, aluminum, iron, chemicals, natural gas, fresh water,
electricity, and government actions such as tariffs. Such
commodities are at times subject to volatile price movements,
including increases that could make production at certain
operations less profitable or not profitable at all. A material
increase in costs at any significant location could have a
significant effect on our profitability.
A
disruption in, or failure of our third-party service providers’ IT
systems, including those related to cybersecurity, could adversely
affect our business operations and financial
performance.
We
rely on the accuracy, capacity and security of our third-party
service providers’ IT systems for the operations of many of our
business processes and to comply with regulatory, legal and tax
requirements. We are dependent on third parties to provide
important IT services relating to, among other things, operational
technology at our facilities, human resources, electronic
communications and certain finance functions. Despite the security
measures that our third-party service providers have implemented,
including those related to cybersecurity, their systems could be
breached or damaged by computer viruses, natural or man-made
incidents or disasters, or unauthorized physical or electronic
access. Though our third-party service providers have controls in
place, we cannot provide assurance that a cyber-attack will not
occur. Furthermore, we may have little or no oversight with respect
to security measures employed by third-party service providers,
which may ultimately prove to be ineffective at countering threats.
Failures of our third-party service providers’ IT systems, whether
caused maliciously or inadvertently, may result in the disruption
of our business processes, or in the unauthorized release of
sensitive, confidential or otherwise protected information or
result in the corruption of data, which could adversely affect our
business operations and financial performance. In addition, we may
be required to incur significant costs to protect against and, if
required, remediate the damage caused by such disruptions or system
failures in the future.
A
shortage of equipment and supplies could adversely affect our
ability to operate our business.
We
are dependent on various supplies and equipment to carry out our
mining exploration and, if warranted, project development
operations. The shortage of such supplies, equipment, and parts
could have a material adverse effect on our ability to carry out
our operations and could therefore limit, or increase the cost of,
production. Ongoing disruptions to the world’s economy, including
issues related to supply chains and the COVID-19 pandemic, may
delay our ability to secure supplies and equipment for the Elk
Creek Project on a timely basis
Joint
ventures and other partnerships, including offtake arrangements,
may expose us to risks.
We
have entered into three offtake agreements and one letter of intent
related to our Elk Creek Project as well as agreements related to
the supply of natural gas and electricity to the project site, and
may enter into joint ventures or partnership arrangements,
including additional offtake agreements, with other parties in
relation to the exploration, development, and production of certain
of the properties in which we have an interest. Any failure of such
other companies to meet their obligations to us or to third
parties, or any disputes with respect to the parties’ respective
rights and obligations, or price fluctuations and termination
provisions related to such agreements, could have a material
adverse effect on us, the development and production at our
properties, including the Elk Creek Project, the joint ventures, if
any, or their properties and therefore could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, financial performance,
cash flows and the price of the Common Shares.
We
may experience difficulty attracting and retaining qualified
management to meet the needs of our anticipated growth, and the
failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material
adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We
are dependent on a relatively small number of key employees,
including our Chief Executive Officer. The loss of any officer
could have an adverse effect on us. We have no life insurance on
any individual, and we may be unable to hire a suitable replacement
for them on favorable terms, should that become
necessary.
The
effect on the capital markets and the economy of recent global
events, including the COVID-19 pandemic, could have an adverse
effect on NioCorp’s business plans, financial condition and
liquidity.
As a
result of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of
Ukraine, certain events have affected the global and United States
economies, including increased inflation, supply chain issues,
additional volatility in commodity prices, and uncertain capital
markets with declines in leading market indexes. In addition, in
the U.S., the Federal Reserve has begun raising interest rates
sharply, the continuation of which could lead to a recession with
uncertain and potentially severe impacts upon most operating
sectors. We cannot predict how this will affect our business, but
the impact may be adverse.
Although
it is not possible to predict the ultimate impact of the COVID-19
pandemic, or other global health crises, on NioCorp’s business
plans, financial position or liquidity, such impacts that may be
material include, but are not limited to: (i) inability to obtain
necessary licenses or permits due to impacts on the operations of
local, state and federal regulatory agencies, (ii) delays in the
completion of the mine and surface engineering designs and
uncertainty regarding our ability to finalize necessary
Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (“EPC”) agreements as a
result of disruptions in the businesses of our engineering
consultants and key contractors for the Elk Creek Project, (iii)
reduced availability and productivity of our employees, (iv)
increased operational risks as a result of remote work
arrangements, including the potential effects on internal controls,
as well as cybersecurity risks and increased vulnerability to
security breaches, information technology disruptions and other
similar events, (v) a negative impact on our liquidity position,
and (vi) increased costs and less ability to access funds under our
existing credit facility and the capital markets. The full extent
to which the COVID-19 pandemic, or other global health crises, and
our precautionary measures may continue to impact our business will
depend on future developments, which continue to be highly
uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time.
In
addition, we cannot predict the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic,
or other global health crises, will have on our customers,
suppliers, vendors, and other business partners, and each of their
financial conditions; however, any material effect on these parties
could adversely impact us. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, or
other global health crises, may also exacerbate other risks
discussed herein, any of which could have a material effect on us.
This situation is changing rapidly, and additional impacts may
arise that we are not aware of currently.
It
may be difficult to enforce judgments or bring actions outside the
U.S. against us and certain of our directors.
We
are a Canadian corporation and, as a result, it may be difficult or
impossible for an investor to do the following:
|
● |
enforce
in courts outside the U.S. judgments obtained in U.S. courts based
upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws
against these persons and the Company; or |
|
● |
bring
in courts outside the U.S. an original action to enforce
liabilities based upon U.S. federal securities laws against these
persons and the Company. |
Risks Related to Mining and Exploration
We
face numerous uncertainties in estimating our mineral reserves and
resources and inaccuracies in our estimates could result in lower
than expected revenues, higher than expected costs and decreased
profitability.
A
mineral is economically recoverable when the price at which we may
sell the mineral exceeds the costs and expenses of mining and
selling the mineral. Forecasts of our future performance are based
on, among other things, estimates of our mineral reserves. We base
our reserve and resource information on engineering, economic and
geological data assembled and analyzed by qualified persons, which
include various engineers and geologists on our staff and of third
parties. Our estimates are also subject to SEC regulations
regarding classification of reserves and resources, including S-K
1300. Our reserve and resource estimates as to both quantity and
quality are updated from time to time to reflect additional
information received. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in
estimating quantities and qualities of mineral reserves and
resources, including many factors beyond our control.
Estimates
of mineral reserves and resources necessarily depend upon a number
of variable factors and assumptions, any one of which may, if
incorrect, result in an estimate that varies considerably from
actual results. These factors and assumptions include, but are not
limited to:
|
● |
geologic
and mining conditions, which may not be fully identified by
available exploration data and may differ from our
experience; |
|
● |
demand
for the minerals that we plan to produce; |
|
● |
current
and future market prices for minerals and contractual
arrangements; |
|
● |
current
and future operating costs and capital expenditures may exceed
estimates, notwithstanding that, under S-K 1300, operating cost and
capital expenditure estimates in feasibility studies must have an
accuracy level of at least ±15% and a contingency range not
exceeding 10%; |
|
● |
severance
and excise taxes, royalties and development and reclamation
costs; |
|
● |
future
mining technology improvements; |
|
● |
the
effects of regulation by governmental agencies; |
|
● |
the
ability to obtain, maintain and renew all required
permits; |
|
● |
employee
health and safety; and |
|
● |
historical
production from the area compared with production from other
producing areas. |
The
conversion of reported mineral resources to mineral reserves should
not be assumed, and the reclassification of reported mineral
resources from lower to higher levels of geological confidence
should not be assumed. As such, actual mineral tonnage recovered
from identified reserves, and revenues and expenditures with
respect to our reserves, may vary materially from estimates. Thus,
these estimates may not accurately reflect our actual reserves. Any
material inaccuracy in our estimates related to our reserves could
result in lower than expected revenues, higher than expected costs
or decreased profitability, which could materially and adversely
affect our business, results of operations, financial position and
cash flows.
The
nature of mineral exploration and production activities involves a
high degree of risk and the possibility of uninsured
losses.
Exploration
for and the production of minerals is highly speculative and
involves much greater risk than many other businesses. Most
exploration programs do not result in the discovery of
mineralization, and any mineralization discovered may not be of
sufficient quantity or quality to be profitably mined. Our
operations are, and any future development or mining operations we
may conduct will be, subject to all of the operating hazards and
risks normally incident to exploring for and developing mineral
properties, such as, but not limited to:
|
● |
economically
insufficient mineralized material; |
|
● |
fluctuation
in production costs that make production uneconomical; |
|
● |
unanticipated
variations in grade and other geologic problems; |
|
● |
difficult
surface or underground conditions; |
|
● |
metallurgical,
pyrometallurgical, and other processing problems; |
|
● |
mechanical
and equipment performance problems; |
|
● |
failure
of dams, stockpiles, wastewater transportation systems, or
impoundments; |
|
● |
unusual
or unexpected rock formations; and |
|
● |
personal
injury, fire, flooding, cave-ins, and landslides. |
Any
of these risks can materially and adversely affect, among other
things, the development of properties, production quantities and
rates, costs and expenditures, potential revenues, and production
dates. We currently have very limited insurance to guard against
some of these risks. If we determine that capitalized costs
associated with any of our mineral interests are not likely to be
recovered, we would incur a write-down of our investment in these
interests. All of these factors may result in losses in relation to
amounts spent that are not recoverable, or that result in
additional expenses.
We
have no history of producing commercial products from our current
mining properties and there can be no assurance that we will
successfully establish mining operations or profitably produce
minerals.
We
have no history of producing commercial products from our current
mining properties. We do not produce commercial products and do not
currently generate operating earnings. While we seek to move our
Elk Creek Project from a development stage property to a production
stage property, such efforts will be subject to all of the risks
associated with establishing new mining operations and business
enterprises, including:
|
● |
the
timing and cost, which are considerable, of the construction of
mining and processing facilities; |
|
● |
the
availability and costs of skilled labor and equipment; |
|
● |
compliance
with environmental and other governmental approval and permit
requirements; |
|
● |
the
availability of funds to finance construction and development
activities; |
|
● |
potential
opposition from non-governmental organizations, local groups, or
local residents that may delay or prevent development activities;
and |
|
● |
potential
increases in construction and operating costs due to changes in the
cost and availability of labor, fuel, power, materials, equipment
and supplies, and the time elapsed since the most recent estimates
of cost and availability were made. |
It is
common in new mining and processing operations to experience
unexpected problems and delays during engineering, procurement,
construction, commissioning, and initial operations. In addition,
our management and workforce will need to be expanded, and
sufficient housing and other support systems for our workforce will
have to be established. This could result in delays in the
commencement of production and increased costs of production.
Accordingly, we cannot assure you that our activities will result
in profitable operations or that we will successfully establish
mining and processing operations.
Results
of metallurgical testing by us may not be favorable to, or as
expected by, us.
We
have completed significant bench, mini-pilot, and pilot scale
metallurgical testing on material from the Elk Creek Project and
will continue to complete necessary metallurgical testing at the
bench, mini-pilot, and pilot scale as the exploration and, if
warranted, development of the Elk Creek Project progresses. There
can be no assurance that the results of such metallurgical testing
will be favorable to, or will be as expected by, us. Furthermore,
there can be no certainty that metallurgical recoveries obtained in
bench or pilot scale tests will be achieved in either subsequent
testing or commercial operations. The development of a complete
metallurgical process to produce saleable final products from the
Elk Creek Project is a complex and resource-intensive undertaking
that may result in overall schedule delays and increased project
costs for us.
Price
volatility could have dramatic effects on our results of operations
and our ability to execute our business plan.
The
price of commodities varies on a daily basis. Niobium is a
specialty metal and not a commonly traded commodity such as copper,
zinc, gold, or iron ore. The price of niobium tends to be set
through a limited long-term offtake market, contracted between very
few suppliers and purchasers. The world’s largest supplier of
niobium, Companhia Brasileira de Metalurgia e Mineração, supplies
approximately 85% of the world’s niobium. Any attempt to suppress
the price of niobium by such supplier, or an increase in production
by any supplier in excess of any increased demand, would have
negative consequences on the price of niobium and, potentially, on
our value. The price of niobium may also be reduced by the
discovery of new niobium deposits, which could not only increase
the overall supply of niobium (causing downward pressure on its
price) but could draw new firms into the niobium industry that
would compete with us.
Sc2O3
is used in solid oxide fuel cells and has the potential to become a
valuable alloy with aluminum in the aerospace and automotive
industries. Supply of scandium has been sporadic in recent years,
and there are no primary scandium mines in the world at present.
Production primarily occurs as a by-product from existing
metallurgical plants, primarily in Russia, Canada, the Philippines,
and China. Our management believes the Elk Creek Project would
significantly increase the world’s supply of scandium trioxide.
Although the Company’s market studies indicate a positive outlook
for demand, there is no assurance at present that the Company could
sell all of its production. In addition, the sale of scandium
represents a significant portion of the Elk Creek Project revenue;
achieving the revenue projected in the Company’s studies is subject
to market growth in scandium, which is a developing market with a
risk of oversupply and/or undersupply disrupting
pricing.
Titanium
metal is used in various superalloys and other applications for
aerospace applications, armor, and medical implants, and in oxide
form is a key component of pigments used in paper, paint, and
plastics. The Elk Creek Project would produce a small quantity of
titanium dioxide relative to other producers. As a small producer,
we would be subject to fluctuations in the price of TiO2
that would result from normal variations in supply and demand for
this commodity.
We
may not be able to establish a viable recovery process for
REEs.
The
market for rare earth products requires particular levels of purity
and chemical form, which are achieved through the extraction and
separation of individual REEs from each other as well as from the
other constituents in the rare earth ore. At present, the Company
has not completed the engineering or testing of a process for
producing commercial rare earth products and has further not
declared a REE reserve estimate for the Elk Creek deposit. The
completion of the work necessary to demonstrate an economically
feasible rare earth recovery system will require significant
expenditures of cash and considerable time to complete. There is no
guarantee that the Company will be successful in demonstrating
positive economics for a rare earth recovery system tied to the Elk
Creek Project, nor is there any guarantee that once constructed,
the rare earth recovery system will operate as designed and produce
saleable commercial products.
Estimates
of resources and reserves are subject to evaluation uncertainties
that could result in project failure.
Our
exploration and future mining operations, if any, are and would be
faced with risks associated with being able to accurately predict
the quantity and quality of resources/reserves within the earth
using statistical sampling techniques. Estimates of any
resources/reserves on any of our properties would be made using
samples obtained from appropriately placed trenches, test pits,
underground workings, and intelligently designed drilling. There is
an inherent variability of assays between check and duplicate
samples taken adjacent to each other and between sampling points
that cannot be reasonably eliminated. Additionally, there also may
be unknown geologic details that have not been identified or
correctly appreciated at the current level of accumulated knowledge
about our properties. This could result in uncertainties that
cannot be reasonably eliminated from the process of estimating
resources/reserves. If these estimates were to prove to be
unreliable, we could implement an exploitation plan that may not
lead to commercially viable operations in the future.
Any
material changes in mineral resource/reserve estimates and grades
of mineralization will affect the economic viability of placing a
property into production and a property’s return on
capital.
Mineral
resource/reserve estimates may require adjustments or downward
revisions. In addition, the grade of ore ultimately mined, if any,
may differ from that indicated by our feasibility studies and drill
results. Minerals recovered in small scale tests may not be
duplicated in large scale tests under on-site conditions or at
commercial production scale.
The
resource and reserve estimates included in the S-K 1300 Elk Creek
Technical Report Summary and contained in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K have been determined based on assumed future prices,
cut-off grades, and operating costs that may prove to be
inaccurate. Extended declines in market prices for our products may
render portions of our resource/reserve estimates uneconomic and
may result in reduced reported resources/reserves or may adversely
affect any commercial viability determinations we may reach. Any
material reductions in estimates of resources/reserves could have a
material adverse effect on our Common Share price and on the value
of our properties.
We
face intense competition in the mining industry.
The
mining industry is intensely competitive in all of its phases. As a
result of this competition, some of which is with large established
mining companies with substantial capabilities and with greater
financial and technical resources than ours, we may be unable to
acquire additional properties, if any, or financing on terms we
consider acceptable. We also compete with other mining companies in
the recruitment and retention of qualified managerial and technical
employees. If we are unable to successfully compete for qualified
employees, our exploration and development programs may be slowed
down or suspended. We compete with other companies that produce our
planned commercial products for capital. If we are unable to raise
sufficient capital, our exploration and development programs may be
jeopardized or we may not be able to acquire, develop, or operate
additional mining projects.
Difficulties
in water balance management at our Elk Creek Project could
negatively affect our potential production and economics at the
project.
The
Company has conducted three field investigations and two major
technical studies into the hydrogeology of the Elk Creek
carbonatite, which is the geologic formation which hosts the
mineralized material that would be extracted by the Company’s
mining operations. The Company expects to encounter significant
amounts of water in the carbonatite, which will need to be pumped
out of the formation to facilitate a mining operation. Water
quality analyses have demonstrated that this water will have
elevated temperature and salt content when compared to other water
resources in the area. While the Company has developed plans to
treat water produced from the mine for use in its operations, there
is no guarantee that the permits needed for the treatment of the
water or the disposal of the resultant waste products will be
issued by the State of Nebraska, nor is there any guarantee that
such permits will be issued in a timely fashion. Further, based on
such plans, the operations will rely on a water treatment system to
achieve zero discharge of wastewater, and there is no guarantee
that this system will function as designed or achieve nameplate
treatment capacity.
Title
to our properties may be subject to other claims that could affect
our property rights and claims.
There
are risks that title to our properties may be challenged or
impugned. Our Elk Creek Project is located in Nebraska and may be
subject to prior unrecorded agreements or transfers or native land
claims, and title may be affected by undetected defects. Our
current leases give us an option to purchase additional property,
which, along with the property we already own, will allow us to
construct the Elk Creek Project once sufficient project financing
is obtained. The rights of the current owners to sell the property
subject to these options may be subject to prior unrecorded or
unknown claims to title. We have investigated our rights to explore
and exploit the Elk Creek Project resource/reserve and, to the best
of our knowledge, our rights in relation to lands covering the Elk
Creek Project resource/reserve are in good standing. However, there
may be valid challenges to the title of our properties that, if
successful, could impair development and/or operations. Further,
our current land agreements, which are important for operations,
are of fixed duration and expire between December 2024 and May
2040.
Our
properties and operations may be subject to litigation or other
claims.
From
time to time our properties or operations may be subject to
disputes that may result in litigation or other legal claims. We
may be required to assert or defend against these claims, which
will divert resources and management time from operations. The
costs of these claims or adverse filings may have a material effect
on our business and results of operations.
We do
not currently insure against all the risks and hazards of mineral
exploration, development, and mining operations.
Exploration,
development, mining, and surface operations involve various
hazards, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents,
metallurgical and other processing problems, unusual or unexpected
rock formations, structural cave-ins or slides, flooding, fires,
and periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather
conditions. These risks could result in damage to or destruction of
mineral properties, facilities, or other property, personal injury,
environmental damage, delays in operations, increased cost of
operations, monetary losses, and possible legal liability. We may
not be able to obtain insurance to cover these risks at
economically feasible premiums or at all. We may elect not to
insure where premium costs are disproportionate to our perception
of the relevant risks. The payment of such insurance premiums and
of such liabilities would reduce the funds available for
exploration and production activities.
Risks Related to Government Regulation
We
may not be able to obtain or renew all required permits and
licenses to place any of our properties into production.
Our
current and future operations, including development activities and
commencement of production, if warranted, on the Elk Creek Project,
require permits from governmental authorities and such operations
are and will be governed by laws and regulations governing
prospecting, development, mining, production, exports, taxes, labor
standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances,
land use, environmental protection, mine safety, and other matters.
Companies engaged in mineral property exploration and the
development or operation of mines and related facilities generally
experience increased costs, as well as delays in production and
other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable
laws, regulations, and permits. We cannot predict if all permits
that we may require for continued exploration, development, or
construction of mining facilities and conduct of mining operations
will be obtainable or renewable on reasonable terms, if at all.
Costs related to applying for and obtaining permits and licenses
may be prohibitive and could delay our planned exploration and
development activities. Failure to comply with applicable laws,
regulations, and permitting requirements may result in enforcement
actions, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial
authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may
include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures,
installation of additional equipment, or remedial
actions.
Facilities
associated with the Elk Creek Project, such as the mine, surface
plant, tailings facilities, stockpiles and supporting
infrastructure, are likely to either temporarily or permanently
impact waterbodies and wetlands that are subject to regulation by
the USACE as Waters of the United States (“WOUS”). We believe that
we have obtained the necessary USACE permits to construct the
project, but changes to the design or layout of the facility may
trigger the USACE to require us to obtain and maintain additional
permits for the Elk Creek Project. The duration of this permitting
exercise is dictated by the USACE and would need to be completed
before facilities that would impact WOUS could be constructed. We
may experience delays or additional costs in relation to obtaining
the necessary permits and these delays and additional costs could
negatively affect the economics of the Elk Creek Project and our
results of operations.
Parties
engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those
suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may
have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of
applicable laws or regulations. Amendments to current laws,
regulations, and permits governing operations and activities of
mining companies, or more stringent implementation thereof, could
have a material adverse impact on our operations and cause
increases in capital expenditures or production costs or reduction
in levels of production at producing properties or require
abandonment or delays in development of new mining
properties.
We
are subject to significant governmental regulations that affect our
operations and costs of conducting our business.
Our
current and future operations, including exploration and, if
warranted, development of the Elk Creek Project, are and will be
governed by laws and regulations, including:
|
● |
laws
and regulations governing mineral concession acquisition,
prospecting, development, mining, and production; |
|
● |
laws
and regulations related to exports, taxes, and fees; |
|
● |
labor
standards and regulations related to occupational health and mine
safety; and |
|
● |
environmental
standards and regulations related to waste disposal, toxic
substances, land use reclamation, and environmental
protection. |
Companies
engaged in exploration activities often experience increased costs
and delays in production and other schedules as a result of the
need to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permits.
Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permits
may result in enforcement actions, including the forfeiture of
mineral claims or other mineral tenures, orders issued by
regulatory or judicial authorities requiring operations to cease or
be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital
expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or costly
remedial actions. We may be required to compensate those suffering
loss or damage by reason of our mineral exploration activities and
may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for
violations of such laws, regulations, and permits.
Existing
and possible future laws, regulations, and permits governing
operations and activities of exploration companies, or more
stringent implementation, could have a material adverse impact on
our business and cause increases in capital expenditures or require
abandonment or delays in exploration. Our Elk Creek Project is
located in Nebraska, and while the State does have a comprehensive
and modern set of environmental regulations, it does not have
specific regulations with respect to permitting or reclaiming mines
which could potentially impact the total time to market for the
project.
Our
activities are subject to environmental laws and regulations that
may change, thereby increasing our costs of doing business and
restricting our operations.
All
phases of our operations are subject to environmental regulation in
the jurisdictions in which we operate. Environmental legislation is
evolving in a manner that may require stricter standards and
enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more
stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a
heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their
officers, directors, and employees. These laws address emissions
into the air, discharges into water, management of waste,
management of hazardous substances, protection of natural
resources, antiquities and endangered species, and reclamation of
lands disturbed by mining operations. Compliance with environmental
laws and regulations, and future changes in these laws and
regulations, may require significant capital outlays and may cause
material changes or delays in our operations and future activities.
It is possible that future changes in these laws or regulations
could have a significant adverse impact on our properties or some
portion of our business, causing us to re-evaluate those activities
at that time.
Regulations
and pending legislation governing issues involving climate change
could result in increased operating costs, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
A
number of governments or governmental bodies have introduced or are
contemplating legislative and/or regulatory changes in response to
concerns about the potential impact of climate change. Legislation
and increased regulation regarding climate change could impose
significant costs on us, on our future venture partners, if any,
and on our suppliers, including costs related to increased energy
requirements, capital equipment, environmental monitoring and
reporting, and other costs necessary to comply with such
regulations. Any adopted future climate change regulations could
also negatively impact our ability to compete with companies
situated in areas not subject to such limitations. Given the
emotion, political significance, and uncertainty surrounding the
impact of climate change and how it should be dealt with, we cannot
predict how legislation and regulation will affect our financial
condition, operating performance, and ability to compete.
Furthermore, even without such regulation, increased awareness and
any adverse publicity in the global marketplace about potential
impacts on climate change by us or other companies in our industry
could harm our reputation. The potential physical impacts of
climate change on our operations are highly uncertain and could be
particular to the geographic circumstances in areas in which we
operate and may include changes in rainfall and storm patterns and
intensities, water shortages, changing sea levels, and changing
temperatures. These impacts may adversely impact the cost,
production, and financial performance of our operations.
Land
reclamation requirements for our properties may be burdensome and
expensive.
Although
variable depending on location and the governing authority, land
reclamation requirements are generally imposed on mineral
exploration companies (as well as companies with mining operations)
in order to minimize long-term effects of land
disturbance.
Reclamation
may include requirements to:
|
● |
control
dispersion of potentially deleterious effluents; |
|
● |
treat
ground and surface water to achieve water quality standards;
and |
|
● |
reasonably
re-establish pre-disturbance landforms and vegetation. |
In
order to carry out reclamation obligations imposed on us in
connection with our potential development activities, we must
allocate financial resources that might otherwise be spent on
further exploration and development programs. We plan to set up a
provision for our reclamation obligations on our properties, as
appropriate, but this provision may not be adequate. If we are
required to carry out unanticipated reclamation work, our financial
position could be adversely affected.
Risks Related to Our Debt
In
the event of certain breaches with our Secured Creditors, our
assets may be affected.
We
have, in connection with the Smith Credit Agreement, granted
security interests to Mark Smith (the “Secured Creditor”) over all
of the assets of the Company in consideration of the debt
facilities provided by the Secured Creditor. In the event of
certain breaches of the terms of the Smith Credit Agreement, the
Secured Creditor may be entitled to execute on its security
interest and seize or retain our assets, including the shares of
0896800 and ECRC, as well as any assets of either subsidiary.
Certain rights of the Secured Creditor to execute on its security
interests are subject to notice and cure provisions in respect of
default by us; however, any such exercise could materially damage
our value and our ability to retain or progress development of the
Elk Creek Project.
The
level of our indebtedness from time to time could impair our
ability to obtain additional financing.
From
time to time, we may enter into transactions to acquire assets or
the shares of other companies or to fund development of the Elk
Creek Project. These transactions may be financed partially or
wholly with debt, which may increase our debt levels above industry
standards. Our articles of incorporation do not limit the amount of
indebtedness that we may incur. Our indebtedness could impair our
ability to obtain additional financing in the future on a timely
basis to take advantage of business opportunities that may arise.
Our ability to service our debt obligations will depend on our
future operations, which are subject to prevailing industry
conditions and other factors, many of which are beyond our
control.
Risks Related to the Common Shares
We
believe that we may be a “passive foreign investment company” for
the current taxable year and for one or more future taxable years,
which may result in materially adverse U.S. federal income tax
consequences for U.S. investors.
We
generally will be designated as a “passive foreign investment
company” under the meaning of Section 1297 of the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (a “PFIC”) if, for a tax year, (a)
75% or more of our gross income for such year is “passive income”
(generally, dividends, interest, rents, royalties, and gains from
the disposition of assets producing passive income) or (b) at least
50% or more of the value of our assets produce, or are held for the
production of, passive income, based on the quarterly average of
the fair market value of such assets. U.S. shareholders should be
aware that we believe we were classified as a PFIC during our tax
years ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 and based on current business
plans and financial expectations, believe that we may be a PFIC for
the current and one or more future taxable years. If we are a PFIC
for any taxable year during a U.S. shareholder’s holding period,
then such U.S. shareholder generally will be required to treat any
gain realized upon a disposition of Common Shares or warrants, or
any “excess distribution” received on its Common Shares, as
ordinary income, and to pay an interest charge on a portion of such
gain or distribution. These consequences will be mitigated with
respect to the Common Shares, but not the warrants, if the
shareholder makes a timely and effective “qualified electing fund”
or “QEF” election or a “mark-to-market” election with respect to
the Common Shares. A U.S. shareholder who makes a QEF election
generally must include in income on a current basis for U.S.
federal income tax purposes its share of our net capital gain and
ordinary earnings for any taxable year in which we are a PFIC,
whether or not we distribute any amount to our shareholders. A U.S.
shareholder who makes a mark-to-market election generally must
include as ordinary income each year the excess of the fair market
value of the Common Shares over the taxpayer’s basis therein. Each
U.S. shareholder should consult its own tax advisors regarding the
PFIC rules and the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares and
warrants.
Our
Common Share price may be volatile and as a result you could lose
all or part of your investment.
In
addition to volatility associated with equity securities in
general, the value of your investment could decline due to the
impact of any of the following factors upon the market price of the
Common Shares:
|
● |
disappointing
results from our exploration and/or, if warranted, project
development efforts; |
|
● |
decline
in demand for Common Shares; |
|
● |
downward revisions in securities analysts’
estimates or changes in general market conditions;
|
|
● |
technological innovations by competitors
or in competing technologies;
|
|
● |
investor perception of our industry or our
prospects; and
|
|
● |
general economic trends.
|
In
the past fiscal year, the trading price of our stock on the TSX has
ranged from a low of C$0.76 to a high of C$1.75. In addition, stock
markets in general have experienced extreme price and volume
fluctuations, and the market prices of securities have been highly
volatile. These fluctuations are often unrelated to operating
performance and may adversely affect the market price of the Common
Shares. As a result, you may be unable to sell any Common Shares
you acquire at a desired price.
We
have never paid dividends on the Common Shares.
We
have not paid dividends on the Common Shares to date, and we may
not be in a position to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
Our ability to pay dividends with respect to the Common Shares will
depend on our ability to successfully develop one or more
properties and generate earnings from operations. Further, our
initial earnings, if any, will likely be retained to finance our
operations. Any future dividends on Common Shares will depend upon
our earnings, our then-existing financial requirements, and other
factors, and will be at the discretion of our Board of
Directors.
Investors’
interests in the Company will be diluted and investors may suffer
dilution in their net book value per Common Share if we issue
additional employee/Director/consultant options or if we sell
additional Common Shares to finance our operations.
In
order to further expand the Company’s operations and meet our
objectives, any additional growth and/or expanded exploration
activity will likely need to be financed through sale of and
issuance of additional Common Shares, including, but not limited
to, raising funds to explore the Elk Creek Project. Furthermore, to
finance any acquisition activity, should that activity be properly
approved, and depending on the outcome of our exploration programs,
we likely will also need to issue additional Common Shares to
finance future acquisitions, growth, and/or additional exploration
programs of any or all of our projects or to acquire additional
properties. We will also in the future grant to some or all of our
directors, officers, and key employees and/or consultants, options
to purchase Common Shares as non-cash incentives. The issuance of
any equity securities could, and the issuance of any additional
Common Shares will, cause our existing shareholders to experience
dilution of their ownership interests.
If we
issue additional Common Shares or decide to enter into joint
ventures with other parties in order to raise financing through the
sale of equity securities, investors’ interests in the Company will
be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book
value per Common Share depending on the price at which such
securities are sold.
We
are subject to the continued listing criteria of the TSX and our
failure to satisfy these criteria may result in delisting of the
Common Shares.
The
Common Shares are currently listed on the TSX. In order to maintain
the listing, we must maintain certain financial and share
distribution targets, including maintaining a minimum number of
public shareholders. In addition to objective standards, the TSX
may delist the securities of any issuer if, in the TSX’s opinion,
the issuer’s financial condition and/or operating results appear
unsatisfactory; if it appears that the extent of public
distribution or the aggregate market value of the security has
become so reduced as to make continued listing on the TSX
inadvisable; if the issuer sells or disposes of principal operating
assets or ceases to be an operating company; if an issuer fails to
comply with the listing requirements of the TSX; or if any other
event occurs or any condition exists which makes continued listing
on the TSX, in the opinion of the TSX, inadvisable.
If
the TSX delists the Common Shares, investors may face material
adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, a lack of a
trading market for the Common Shares, reduced liquidity, decreased
analyst coverage of the Company, and an inability for us to obtain
additional financing to fund our operations.
The
issuance of additional Common Shares may negatively impact the
trading price of our securities.
We
have issued Common Shares in the past and will continue to issue
Common Shares to finance our activities in the future. In addition,
outstanding options, warrants, and broker warrants to purchase
Common Shares may be exercised, resulting in the issuance of
additional Common Shares. The issuance by us of additional Common
Shares would result in dilution to our shareholders, and even the
perception that such an issuance may occur could have a negative
impact on the trading price of the Common Shares.
Broker-dealers
may be discouraged from effecting transactions in Common Shares
because they are considered a penny stock and are subject to the
penny stock rules.
Our
Common Shares are currently considered a “penny stock.” The SEC has
adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any
equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than
$5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share,
subject to certain exceptions. The Common Shares are covered by the
penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice
requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than
established customers and “accredited investors.” The term
“accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets
in excess of $5.0 million or individuals with a net worth in excess
of $1.0 million or annual income exceeding $200 or $300, jointly
with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer,
prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from
the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a
form prepared by the SEC, which provides information about penny
stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market.
The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid
and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the
broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly
account statements showing the market value of each penny stock
held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and
the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be
given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the
transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or
with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock
rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not
otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a
special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable
investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written
agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may
have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the
secondary market for the Common Shares. Consequently, these penny
stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade in
the Common Shares.
|
ITEM
1B. |
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
Elk
Creek Project, Nebraska
Our
principal mineral property is the Elk Creek Property, a niobium,
scandium and titanium development stage property. The Elk Creek
Project has established indicated and inferred resources along with
probable reserves and the Company has completed a feasibility study
for the project. The below information is in part summarized or
extracted from our S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary,
which is filed as Exhibit 96.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Company does not have any other material properties.
The qualified persons responsible for preparing the S-K 1300 Elk
Creek Technical Report Summary are Dahrouge Geological Consulting
USA Ltd.; Understood Mineral Resources Ltd.; Optimize Group; Tetra
Tech; Adrian Brown Consultants Inc.; Metallurgy Concept Solutions;
Magemi Mining Inc.; L3 Process Development; A2GC; Scott Honan,
M.Sc, SME-RM, NioCorp; Everett Bird, P.E., Cementation; Matt Hales,
P.E., Cementation; Mahmood Khwaja, P.E., CDM Smith; Martin Lepage,
P.Eng, Ing., Cementation; and Wynand Marx, M.Eng, BBE Consulting. A
matrix of the sections for which each qualified person is
responsible is included in the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report
Summary. Except for Scott Honan, none of the qualified persons is
affiliated with the Company. Mr. Honan is the Chief Operating
Officer of the Company.
Property
Description and Location
The
Elk Creek Property is a carbonatite deposit located in Johnson
County, southeast Nebraska, USA. The carbonatite contains elements
of economic significance, including niobium, titanium, and
scandium, as well as potential economic significance for rare earth
products. The Elk Creek Property is situated as shown below and is
located within the USGS Tecumseh Quadrangle Nebraska SE (7.5 minute
series) mapsheet in Sections 1-6, 9-11; Township 3N; Range 11E and
Sections 19-23, 25-36; Township 4N, Range 11E, at approximately
40°16’ north and 96°11’ west in the State of Nebraska, in central
USA. The Elk Creek Property is approximately 45 miles southeast of
Lincoln, Nebraska, the state capital of Nebraska.

Title
and Ownership
Land
in the project area is exclusively owned by private entities, and
there is no federal or state land in the project area. The Company
has secured its rights to the project area by purchasing land from
private landowners or by entering into agreements with the
landowners as described below.
The
Company currently owns one 226.43-acre parcel of land and
associated mineral rights, and an additional 40 acres of mineral
rights, within the carbonatite footprint. The Elk Creek Project’s
mine infrastructure and a portion of the supporting operations is
planned to be located on this land parcel. Ownership of the mineral
rights discussed above includes a 2% NSR royalty and grants us
access to more than 90% of the Elk Creek Project’s mineral
resources and mineral reserves.
As of
June 30, 2022, the total book value of the Elk Creek Property and
associated buildings and equipment was $16.9 million.
The
Company also holds eight OTPs that are associated with the Elk
Creek Project and one perpetual easement of a land parcel along the
Missouri River. The current optioned land package covers an area of
1,396 acres and is reflective of the land needed to secure the
remaining mineral resources and mineral reserves held under the
OTPs along with the land needed for the development and operations
of the Elk Creek Project for its proposed 38-year operating
life.
In
general, exercise of an OTP is accomplished by paying the greater
of a fixed amount per acre or a multiple of the appraised value at
the time of purchase. If the land is not purchased by the Company
during the term of the OTP and the land in question is needed for
the project, the Company will negotiate a new OTP with the
landowner. The OTP is accompanied by a negotiated payment to the
landowner that is paid upon execution of the OTP by the Company and
the landowner. As of June 30, 2022, the Company is obligated to
make payments totalling approximately $61 over the next 13 years to
maintain our rights under these OTPs. Details on the current OTPs
held by the Company are shown in the table below.
Active
Lease Agreements (OTP’s) Covering the Elk Creek Project as of
September 2022
Agreement
Identifier |
Hectares |
Acres |
Agreement
Expiry |
Beethe007 |
66.27 |
163.75 |
20-Jan-26 |
Heidemann005 |
79.55 |
196.57 |
16-Mar-25 |
Nielsen001 |
100.90 |
249.32 |
25-Jun-25 |
Nielsen002 |
11.91 |
29.43 |
25-Jun-25 |
Woltemath80S |
32.37 |
80.00 |
4-Dec-24 |
Woltemath002 |
152.49 |
376.81 |
4-Dec-24 |
Woltemath003J |
89.03 |
220.00 |
25-Mar-25 |
Shuey001 |
32.37 |
80.00 |
27-May-40 |
The
OTPs are between NioCorp’s wholly owned subsidiary ECRC and the
individual landowners. Land subject to the OTP agreements is
currently used for agricultural purposes, including growing row
crops (corn and soybeans) and pasturing livestock. The land owned
by ECRC houses the company drill core and geological sample
repository in two steel core shed buildings and the company
maintains a cover crop (sorghum and rye) on portions of the
property that were formerly used for growing row crops. The former
landowner maintains a residence and several outbuildings on the
property subject to a life estate that accompanied the purchase of
the property by the Company in fiscal year 2021.
The
agreements that involve mineral rights include a 2% NSR royalty
attached with the OTP. The OTPs grant the Company an exclusive
right to explore and evaluate the property for the term thereof,
with an option to purchase the surface rights or a combination of
the mineral and surface rights at any time during the term. As the
Woltemath80S agreement is limited to an option to purchase the
surface rights only, it does not contain an NSR
provision.
Land
Tenure Map as of September 2022

The
current estimated mineral resource and reserve is wholly contained
within land owned by the Company and parcel Woltemath003J. The
Company considers these two properties to be the only properties on
which the Company’s development of the Elk Creek Project is
substantially dependent.
As
part of the OTPs, where required, the Company has also secured
surface rights, which allow for access to the land for drilling
activities and associated mineral exploration and project
development work.
Accessibility,
Physiography, Climate and Infrastructure
The
Elk Creek Property is easily accessible year-round as it is
situated approximately 45 miles southeast of Lincoln, Nebraska, the
state capital, and approximately 68 miles south of Omaha, Nebraska.
Access to the site can be completed via road or from one of the
regional airports. There are several regular flights to both
Lincoln and Omaha; however, the Elk Creek Property is most easily
accessible from Lincoln. From Lincoln Municipal Airport, the Elk
Creek Property is accessed via paved roads on the main network and
a secondary network of gravel roads. The drive from the Lincoln
Municipal Airport to the property is typically 1 hour and 15
minutes, and from Omaha’s Eppley Airport, the drive is
approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes.
The
Elk Creek Property is immediately adjacent to paved Nebraska state
highway 50, and the mineral resource and mineral reserve are
centered in Township 4N, Range 11E, Section 33. This section is
immediately southwest of the junction of Nebraska state highways 50
and 62. Rail access is available in the town of Elk Creek, which is
located 3 miles east of the project area. Water is available at the
project site from a well, as well as from Elk Creek, which crosses
Section 33. Water is also available from the Johnson County Rural
Water system, which has distribution infrastructure on the north
side of the Section 33 and from the Pawnee County Rural Water
system, which has distribution infrastructure on the south side of
Section 33. Electricity is provided at the Company’s Core Storage
sheds located on the west side of Section 33 on land owned by the
Company from the Omaha Public Power District (“OPPD”). Personnel
are available from the local surrounding towns, including Elk Creek
(3 miles east), Tecumseh (6 miles north), Steinauer (5 miles
south), Pawnee City (10 miles south) and Syracuse (20 miles north).
Due to the project’s location in Nebraska, there are no ports
nearby.
Southeast
Nebraska is situated in a Humid Continental Climate (Dfa) on the
Köppen climate classification system. In eastern Nebraska, this
climate is generally characterized by hot humid summers and cold
winters. Average winter temperatures vary between 13°F to 35°F.
Average summer temperatures vary between 64°F to 90°F. Exploration,
construction and operational activities may be conducted all year
round.
Average
monthly precipitation (rain and snowfall) varies between 0.9 and
5.0 inches. Average yearly precipitation is between 31 and 33
inches with an average yearly snowfall of approximately 28 inches.
Nebraska is located within an area known for tornadoes which runs
through the central U.S. where thunderstorms are common in the
spring and summer months. Tornadoes primarily occur during the
spring and summer and may occur into the autumn months.
There
are several local communities near the Elk Creek Property,
including Elk Creek and Tecumseh, that will provide local housing
for the Elk Creek Project. There are a number of other communities
within driving distance and the large cities of Lincoln and Omaha
are within reasonable driving distance. Mining activities currently
taking place in the area are limited to limestone and aggregate
operations to support the local cement manufacturing and
construction industries.
The
Elk Creek Project is expected to incorporate surface and
underground infrastructure, as well as tailings storage facilities.
The offsite infrastructure is expected to include a new high
voltage transmission line constructed by the local utility company
and providing power to an on-site primary sub-station and a natural
gas pipeline built by the owner of the interstate pipeline. Water
used for all on-site process needs and activities will be supplied
from mine dewatering activities, local groundwater wells and from a
local water utility. See “—2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study”
below for additional information regarding proposed infrastructure
related to the Elk Creek Project.
The
local topography of eastern Nebraska is relatively low-relief with
shallow rolling hills intersected by shallow river valleys.
Elevation varies from about 1,066 to 1,280 ft above sea level.
Bedrock outcrop exposure is nonexistent in the Elk Creek Project
area.
The
majority of the area around the Elk Creek Project is used for
cultivation of corn and soybeans, along with uses as grazing land.
Native vegetation typical of eastern Nebraska is upland tall-grass,
prairie and upland deciduous forests.
Geology
and Mineralization
Geology
The
Elk Creek Property includes a Carbonatite that has intruded older
Precambrian granitic and low- to medium-grade metamorphic basement
rocks. The Carbonatite is an elliptical magmatic body with a
northwest-trending long axis perpendicular to the strike of the 1.1
billion years ago Midcontinent Rift System, near the northern part
of the Nemaha uplift. The Carbonatite consists predominantly of
dolomite, calcite and ankerite, with lesser chlorite, barite,
phlogopite, pyrochlore, serpentine, fluorite, sulfides and quartz.
It is, however, believed from stratigraphic reconstruction based on
drill core observation in the area that the carbonatite is
unconformably overlain by approximately 200 m of essentially
flat-lying Palaeozoic marine sedimentary rocks, including
carbonates, sandstones and shales of Pennsylvanian age.
Mineralization
The
property hosts niobium, titanium, and scandium mineralization as
well as REEs and barium mineralization that occurs within the Elk
Creek Carbonatite. The current known extents of the Carbonatite
unit are approximately 950 m along strike, 300 m wide, and 750 m in
dip extent, below the unconformity. Niobium, titanium and scandium
are considered the main elements of interest.
The
deposit contains significant concentrations of niobium. Based on
the metallurgical testwork completed to date at a number of
laboratories using QEMSCAN® analysis, the niobium mineralization is
known to be fine grained, and that 77% of the niobium occurs in the
mineral pyrochlore, while the balance occurs in an
iron-titanium-niobium oxide mineral of varying
composition.
Within
the Elk Creek Carbonatite, a host of other elements exist with
varying degrees of concentration. The Company has completed both
whole rock analysis and multi-element analysis on all samples for
the 2014 drilling program, described below, plus resampling of
selected historical core/pulps between 2011 and 2014.
Historical Exploration
Drilling
at the Elk Creek Property was conducted in three phases. The first
was during the 1970’s and 1980’s by the Molybdenum Company of
America (“Molycorp”), the second in 2011 by Quantum Rare Earth
Developments Corp (“Quantum” - NioCorp under its former name), and
the third and latest program from 2014 to 2016 by NioCorp. To date,
129 diamond core holes have been completed for a total of 64,981 m
over the entire geological complex. Of these, a total of 48 holes
(33,909 m) have been completed to date in the mineralized area and
are used in the current mineral resource and reserve estimates.
Five additional holes, with a total length of 3,353.1 m, were
drilled for hydrogeologic and geotechnical purposes in 2015. No
sampling has been completed of these five holes to date and
therefore they have not been considered for the mineral resource or
reserve estimates.
All
drilling has been completed using a combination of Tricone, Reverse
Circulation (“RC”) or Diamond Drilling (“DDH”) in the upper portion
of the hole within the Pennsylvanian sediments. All drilling within
the underlying Carbonatite has been completed using DDH
methods.
Summary
of Drilling Database within Elk Creek Deposit Area
Year |
|
Company |
|
|
Number
of Holes |
|
|
Average
Depth
(m)
|
|
|
Sum
Length
(m)
|
|
1970-1980 |
|
Molycorp |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
596.6 |
|
|
|
16,108.2 |
|
2011 |
|
Quantum |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
772.6 |
|
|
|
2,317.7 |
|
2014-2015 |
|
NioCorp |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
845.4 |
|
|
|
15,482.8 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
700.9 |
|
|
|
33,908.7 |
|
Molycorp, 1973-1986
Between
1973 and 1974, Molycorp completed six drillholes: EC-1 to EC-4,
targeting the Elk Creek anomaly, and two other holes outside the
Elk Creek anomaly area. Drillholes were typically carried out by RC
drilling through the overlying sedimentary rocks and diamond
drilling through the Ordovician-Cambrian basement rocks.
Molycorp
continued their drill program from 1977 and, in May 1978, Molycorp
made its discovery of the current mineral resource with drillhole
EC-11. EC-11 is located on Section 33, Township 4N, and Range 11.
The Carbonatite hosting the Elk Creek Project was intersected at a
vertical depth of 203.61 m (668 ft).
Molycorp
continued its drilling program through to 1984, which mainly
centered on the Elk Creek Project within a radius of roughly 2 km.
By 1984, Molycorp had completed 57 drillholes within the Elk Creek
gravity anomaly area, which included 25 drillholes over the Elk
Creek Project area.
From
1984 to 1986, drilling was focused on the Elk Creek gravity anomaly
area. The anomaly area is roughly 7 km in diameter and drilling was
conducted on a grid pattern of approximately 610 m by 610 m
(roughly 2,000 ft by 2,000 ft) with some closer spaced drillholes
in selected areas.
By
1986, a total of 106 drillholes were completed for a total of
approximately 46,797 m (153,532 ft). The deepest hole reached a
depth of 1,038 m (3,406 ft) and bottomed in carbonatite.
Quantum, 2010-2011
In
April 2011, Quantum conducted a preliminary drill program (three
holes) on the Elk Creek deposit and two REE exploration targets
(two holes), which have been excluded from the current mineral
resource and reserve estimation, as they do not intersect the
Nb2O5 anomaly and are located to the
east. The objectives of the drill program over the Elk Creek
Property were to verify the presence of higher-grade niobium
mineralization at depth, and to infill drill the known niobium
deposit in order to upgrade the resource category of the previous
resource estimate and expand the known resource. The drill program
was also established to collect sufficient sample material for
metallurgical characterization and process development studies of
the niobium mineralization.
The
2011 program consisted of five inclined drillholes, totaling 3,420
m of NQ size diameter core. Inclusive of this total, three
drillholes, totaling 2,318 m, were drilled into the known Elk Creek
deposit.
NioCorp, 2014 to present
NioCorp
commenced drilling on the Elk Creek Property using a three-phased
program. The three-phased program was originally based on 14
drillholes for approximately 12,150 m (announced in a press release
on April 29, 2014), but was subsequently expanded during the
program to 18 drillholes for approximately 15,482 m. Three of the
18 drillholes were drilled for the purpose of metallurgical
characterization and process development studies. Two of these
drillholes, NEC14-MET-01 and NEC14-MET-02, were not assayed, while
NEC14-MET-03 was quarter cored with one quarter being assayed and
the remainder used for metallurgical testwork. The drilling has
been orientated to intersect the geological model from the
southwest and northeast (perpendicular to the strike), with the
exception of NEC14-011 and NEC14-012, which were oriented southeast
and northwest, respectively.
During
fiscal year 2022, NioCorp collected a total of 1,095 samples
originating from 18 diamond drill holes completed by MolyCorp, as
discussed above. These samples were collected, and subsequently
assayed, in order to fill in gaps in our records regarding REE
grades and tonnage that may exist in the deposit. Assaying was
conducted at Actlabs in Ancaster, Ontario. The assay results were
subjected to a Quality Assurance and Quality Control (“QA/QC”)
program consistent with industry best practices.
A
list of the drillholes, sample storage location, and number of
assay results, related to the records gaps noted above, are
presented below and are represented as blue drillhole intervals.
Each sample represented a 5-foot section of drill core. All of the
holes noted below were drilled into the Elk Creek carbonatite in
the vicinity of the mineral resource for the Elk Creek
Project.
2021
Sampling Summary
Resource
Area Drillholes |
Source
/ Storage Facility
|
Samples
selected for REE and Sc Assays |
EC-011 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
65 |
EC-014 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
16 |
EC-015 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
151 |
EC-016 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
26 |
EC-018 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
92 |
EC-019 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
53 |
EC-020 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
30 |
EC-021 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
45 |
EC-022 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
57 |
EC-024 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
19 |
EC-026 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
86 |
EC-027 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
34 |
EC-029 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
27 |
EC-030 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
25 |
EC-031 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
47 |
EC-032 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
111 |
EC-034 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
54 |
EC-037 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
74 |
EC-054 |
Molycorp
Samples / Mead Core Warehouse |
83 |
|
Total |
1,095 |
Resource
Area Assay Distribution Showing REE Assays (Red) and REE Assay Gaps
(Blue).

Internal Controls
NioCorp
integrated a series of routine QA/QC procedures throughout the
sampling and analytical analysis for drilling programs to ensure
the highest level of quality was maintained throughout the process
leading to the estimate of mineral reserves and mineral resources
for the Elk Creek Project. This included the insertion of duplicate
samples taken from various stages of the process, insertion of
known control samples (standard reference materials, certified
reference materials (“CRM”), and blanks) and sending third-party
pulps to the secondary lab (SGS Canada Inc.).
Sample
tickets were assigned initially at the core shed using barcodes
with duplicate tickets placed inside and on the outside of the bag.
Sample identification was confirmed using barcode labelling and
visual sample type comparisons before sample shipment. The use of
barcoded samples ensured both shipment forms and analytical labs
used accurate information. Multiple types of QC samples were
inserted at this stage of the process, which includes the
following:
|
● |
Field
quartz blanks (1 in 20, or 5%) were inserted within or immediately
after samples collected from mineralized intervals, targeting zones
of elevated visual mineralization, where possible. |
|
● |
CRMs
(1 in 20, or 5%) were inserted in the field with the sample
sequence. |
|
● |
Field
quarter-core duplicates (1 in 20, or 5%) were inserted to test
mineralization and sampling variability. |
Additional
details on the QA/QC program can be found in Section 8 of the S-K
1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary.
Mineral
deposits, including the Elk Creek deposit, are inherently uncertain
because of variability at all scales and sparse sampling. In
addition to uncertainty associated with estimation, there are
specific risks and sources of uncertainty associated with the Elk
Creek deposit. See Item 1A, Risk Factors.
S-K
1300 and other similarly purposed International Codes (JORC, 2012;
NI 43-101, 2014) are designed to require disclosure to the public
of risks relating to mineral resource and reserve estimation as
identified and evaluated by a qualified person. The qualified
persons responsible for the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report
Summary address the technical risks in various sections and
consider that no material technical risks are identified.
Additional descriptions of the risks and uncertainty associated
with reported mineral reserves and resources can be found in
Section 11 of the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report
Summary.
2022
Elk Creek Feasibility Study
During
fiscal year 2022, the Company launched geological, metallurgical,
engineering, and other analyses to assess the feasibility of adding
REE production to its plans once sufficient work has been
completed. The Company and its consultants were required to
complete additional assays of historical drill core to fill data
gaps in the existing resource database to establish an REE mineral
resource. The mine plan was also updated. To comply with S-K 1300
regulations, we are filing the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report
Summary as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was
based on the economic and process results of the feasibility study
conducted by the qualified persons, which were also presented in
the 2022 NI 43-101 Elk Creek Technical Report.
The Elk Creek Project is planned as an underground mining operation
using a long-hole stoping mining method and paste backfill,
operating with a processing rate of 2,764 tonnes per day. Expected
total production over the 38-year mine life includes 171,140 tonnes
of payable niobium, 3,676 tonnes of Sc2O3,
and 431,793 tonnes of TiO2. Estimated up-front direct
capital costs are $760 million, in addition to indirect costs of
$187 million, pre-production capital costs of $92 million, an
overall contingency of $102 million, and pre-production net revenue
credit of $257 million.
Financial Analysis Included in the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility
Study
The
metrics reported in the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary
are based on the cash flow model results. The metrics are on both a
pre-tax and after-tax basis, on a 100% equity basis with no Elk
Creek Project financing inputs and are in first quarter 2019 U.S.
constant dollars. Foreign exchange impacts were deemed negligible
as most, if not all, costs and revenues are denominated in U.S.
dollars. Key criteria used in the analysis are discussed in detail
throughout this section. “US$” refers to whole U. S.
Dollars.
Principal Project Assumptions Included in the 2022 Elk Creek
Feasibility Study
Description |
Value |
Pre-Production
Period |
4
years |
Process
Plant Life |
38
years |
Mine
Operating Days per Year |
365 |
Mill
Operating Days per Year |
365 |
Discount
Rate, End of Period |
@
8% |
Commercial
Production Year |
2025 |
Summary of Key Evaluation Metrics Included in the 2022 Elk Creek
Feasibility Study
Description |
|
Value |
|
Ore Mined (kt) |
|
|
36,655 |
|
Ore Mining Rate (t/d) |
|
|
2,764 |
|
Niobium Grade |
|
|
0.81 |
% |
Scandium Grade (parts per million, “ppm”) |
|
|
70.2 |
|
TiO2
Grade |
|
|
2.92 |
% |
Contained
Nb2O5 (kt) |
|
|
297 |
|
Contained Sc (t) |
|
|
2,573 |
|
Contained
TiO2 (kt) |
|
|
1,071 |
|
Total Ore Processed (kt) |
|
|
36,655 |
|
Processing Rate (kt/y) |
|
|
1,009 |
|
Average
Recovery, Nb2O5 |
|
|
82.4 |
% |
Average Recovery Sc |
|
|
93.1 |
% |
Average
Recovery TiO2 |
|
|
40.3 |
% |
Recovered
Nb2O5 (kt) |
|
|
245 |
|
Recovered Sc (t) |
|
|
2,395 |
|
Recovered
TiO2 (kt) |
|
|
432 |
|
Realized Market Prices |
|
|
|
|
Nb (US$/kg) |
|
$ |
46.55 |
|
TiO2
(US$/kg) |
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
Sc2O3
(US$/kg) |
|
$ |
3,674 |
|
Payable Metal |
|
|
|
|
Nb (t) |
|
|
171,140 |
|
Sc2O3
(t) |
|
|
3,676 |
|
TiO2
(t) |
|
|
431,793 |
|
Summary Projected Economic Results Included in the 2022 Elk Creek
Feasibility Study
Description |
|
Value ($000) |
|
Total Gross Revenue |
|
$ |
21,899,726 |
|
Operating Costs: |
|
|
|
|
Mining Cost |
|
|
(1,553,325 |
) |
Process Cost |
|
|
(3,911,116 |
) |
Site G&A Cost |
|
|
(300,400 |
) |
Concentrate Freight Cost |
|
|
(10,472 |
) |
Other Infrastructure Costs |
|
|
(200,407 |
) |
Water Management Cost |
|
|
(609,195 |
) |
Tailings Management Cost |
|
|
(73,822 |
) |
Property Tax |
|
|
(217,540 |
) |
Royalties |
|
|
(300,503 |
) |
Annual Bond Premium |
|
|
(5,500 |
) |
Total Operating Costs |
|
|
(7,182,280 |
) |
Operating
Margin (EBITDA1) |
|
|
14,717,445 |
|
Effective Tax Rate |
|
|
16.42 |
% |
Total Taxes |
|
|
(2,246,186 |
) |
Working Capital |
|
|
- |
|
Operating Cash Flow |
|
$ |
12,471,258 |
|
Totals
may not sum due to rounding. |
1 |
The
term “EBITDA” refers to earnings before interest, taxes
depreciation and amortization. See “Non-GAAP Financial Performance
Measures” below for a discussion of the use of non-GAAP financial
measures. |
Operating Cost Estimates Included in the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility
Study
The
following LoM unit operating costs include the pre-production and
first/last years of production.
Description |
|
LoM US$/t ore |
|
Mining Cost |
|
$ |
42.38 |
|
Process Cost |
|
|
106.70 |
|
Water Management Cost |
|
|
16.62 |
|
Site G&A Cost |
|
|
8.20 |
|
Other Infrastructure |
|
|
5.47 |
|
Tailings Management Cost |
|
|
2.01 |
|
Other Expenses |
|
|
6.22 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
187.59 |
|
Royalties/Annual Bond Premium |
|
|
8.35 |
|
Total LoM Operating Costs |
|
$ |
195.94 |
|
Totals
may not sum due to rounding. |
Capital Cost Estimates Included in the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility
Study
The
following table shows the breakout in LoM initial capital and
sustaining capital cost estimates (excluding closure and
reclamation of $44 million), which total $1,562 million. This
includes a total initial capital cost of $1,141 million, including
a 10% contingency.
|
($000,000) |
Description |
Initial |
Sustaining |
Total |
Capitalized
Preproduction Expenses |
$ |
77 |
$ |
- |
$ |
77 |
Site
Preparation and Infrastructure |
41 |
15 |
56 |
Processing
Plant |
367 |
96 |
464 |
Water
Management and Treatment |
74 |
24 |
97 |
Mining
Infrastructure |
257 |
198 |
455 |
Tailings
Management |
21 |
79 |
100 |
Site
Wide Indirects |
7 |
- |
7 |
Processing
Indirects |
96 |
- |
96 |
Mining
Indirects |
41 |
- |
41 |
Commissioning |
15 |
- |
15 |
Owner’s
Costs |
34 |
- |
34 |
Mine
Water Management Indirects |
9 |
- |
9 |
Contingency |
102 |
9 |
111 |
Total
Capital Costs |
$ |
1,141 |
$ |
422 |
$ |
1,562 |
Totals
may not sum due to rounding. |
Planned Mining Operations
The
Elk Creek Project is planned as an underground mining operation
using a long-hole stoping mining method and paste backfill, with
shaft access to minimize development through water bearing
horizons. The mine will utilize jumbo drills for lateral
development and tophammer and down-the-hole drills for vertical
development and production stoping. Rock bolters will be used for
ground support and probe holes will be used to support mine
grouting where required. Ore will be remotely mucked from the
bottom stope accesses using 14 tonne Load-Haul-Dump units (“LHD”).
The LHDs will transport the ore to an ore pass directly or to
remuck bays to maximize the efficiency of the stope mucking
operations. When needed, a second LHD and a fleet of 40 tonne haul
trucks will be used to transport ore from the remuck bays to the
grizzly feeding the underground material handling system. Multiple
remuck bays are used on each level to avoid interference between
the LHD and the haul trucks. The ore is fed through the grizzlys
with rock breakers into an underground crusher (the “Primary
Crusher”) and via a material handling system to the
surface.
Planned Processing Operations
Planned
ore process operations include mineral processing,
hydrometallurgical processing (“Hydromet”), and pyrometallurgical
processing (“Pyromet”) housed in separate buildings.
The
mineral processing building will house all of its equipment within
a single large building. Ore from the Primary Crusher (located in
the underground mine) will be fed to the secondary cone crusher
system, operating in closed circuit with a double deck screen. The
screen undersize from the cone crusher system will be fed to a
high-pressure grinding roll unit (“HPGR”), operating in closed
circuit with another double deck screen. The HPGR screen undersize
is the comminution product that will report to the Hydromet
process.
The
Hydromet plant building will be a multi-level engineered steel
structure, which will house equipment on two levels. Ore from
mineral processing will be fed through 15 individual processes
required to separate the three recoverable products. The purpose of
the Hydromet processing steps is to leach the pay metals into
solution using two separate acid leaches (Hydrochloric Acid Leach
and Sulfuric Acid Bake), remove impurities, separate the three pay
metals, and perform precipitation/processing to final solid oxide
forms. Outputs from the Hydromet Process include saleable
TiO2 and Sc2O3, with
Nb2O5 reporting to the Pyromet plant for
final processing. The Hydromet plant will be supported by a
Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration plant and a Sulfuric Acid
Plant.
The Pyromet building will house most of its equipment within a
single building. The purpose of the Pyromet plant is to reduce the
Nb2O5 coming from the Hydromet plant by
converting it into a saleable FeNb metal. Aluminum shots and iron
oxide pellets will be introduced to an electric arc furnace on a
continuous basis along with fluxing agents and
Nb2O5 to produce a saleable ferroniobium
metal.
Proposed Production Plan and Schedule
Based on the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study, the operating mine
life is approximately 38 years with a nominal processing rate of
2,764 tonnes per day. The Elk Creek Project timeline is based on 39
months to mechanical completion after Authorization to Proceed,
plus an additional six months of commissioning and ramp-up to 100%
of production capacity for a total of 45 months and assumes no
financing constraints. The NioCorp board must approve a
construction program and budget before construction of the Elk
Creek Project can begin. This approval, along with the receipt of
all required governmental permits and approvals and the completion
of project financings, will determine whether and when construction
of the Elk Creek Project can begin.
Proposed Tailings Storage
The tailings produced by the process plant will consist of filtered
water leach residue, calcined excess oxide, and slag. Four TSFs
will be constructed sequentially to contain the tailings over the
life of the Elk Creek Project and would contain approximately
14.5 million tonnes of tailings. The tailings facilities have
been designed to incorporate two independent areas: a
composite-lined tailings solids storage area; and an area with
double lined containment, including a leak collection and recovery
system for management of stormwater runoff and drainage from the
tailings solids. The TSFs will store predominantly dry (i.e., not
in a slurry consistency) tailings from the plant with embankment
construction based on a “downstream” construction method. Facility
closure is considered in the design.
Proposed Salt Management
The crystalline salt produced as a waste product of heating and
evaporating brine from the reverse osmosis (“RO”) water treatment
plant will be transported by conveyor to the temporary salt staging
area and then be transported by truck to the dedicated salt
management cells (“SMC”). Two SMCs will be constructed sequentially
to contain the salt over the life of the project and would contain
approximately 1.63 million cubic meters of salt. The SMCs design
will incorporate a composite-lined storage area with double-lined
containment including a leak collection and recovery system for
management of stormwater runoff and drainage.
Proposed Water Management
For
the first several years of construction, the advancement of the
shaft and underground workings will require limited dewatering,
anticipated to be through lower-level sumping and pumping for
surface collection and disposal. Initially, water will be stored in
the lined SMC #1 during construction or will be trucked off-site
for treatment at a local publicly owned treatment works. Excess
water in the SMCs will be spray evaporated within the footprint of
the SMC, to avoid the reintroduction of soluble salts into the
water treatment system. Temporary on-site storage or off-site
shipment and disposal of the crystallizer solid waste may be
necessary until construction of SMC #1 is completed.
Once
full operations commence, we anticipate a shortfall of
approximately 3,700 gallons per minute of operational and
processing water, as the underground mine dewatering is only
expected to produce 1,000 gallons per minute. To make up this
shortfall, we would purchase fresh water from a local utility and
from local landowners.
Once
tailings begin being deposited in the TSF, internal contact water
(from residual moisture in the tailings and precipitation falling
within the impoundment footprint) will need to be actively managed.
This water will be collected and treated using lime softening to
precipitate hydroxide and carbonate solid forms for many of the
inorganic constituents. The treated water will be filtered to
remove the solids (which will be returned to the TSF for disposal),
and the clean water will be pumped to the process plant RO system
for further treatment. The clean water from the process plant RO
unit will be used in the process plant, and the reject concentrate
will be crystallized and deposited into the SMCs.
Proposed Source of Power
The
local power utility (Omaha Public Power District) will provide
power from nearby transmission lines to the site. This will require
that an approximate 18-mile transmission line be installed by the
utility to provide the site sub-station with the required site
power demand. The local power utility will also design and install
the main substation that will be owned and maintained by the
utility. This infrastructure will be paid back through rate charges
on the electrical usage.
Proposed Source of Natural Gas
Natural
gas, to be used throughout the Elk Creek Project during the
construction and operation phases of the project, will be brought
to the site via pipeline from the local utility company. NioCorp
has a natural gas transportation contract with Tallgrass Energy,
which operates the Rockies Express (“REX”) pipeline. Tallgrass will
construct a 45 kilometer (28 mile) gas pipeline lateral from the
main REX pipeline system in Kansas to the project site. The lateral
will be sized to provide a minimum of 27.5 dekatherms of gas per
day. Natural gas will be distributed to all on-site facilities
utilizing buried high-density polyethylene natural gas distribution
pipe. Natural gas piping above ground and located inside of
facilities will consist predominately of carbon steel pipe. Maximum
on-site pipeline distribution pressure will be 100 pounds per
square inch gauge. Natural gas will be used for facility heating,
water heating, and for gas-fired process equipment.
Markets
Market studies for niobium, TiO2 and
Sc2O3 are an important part of the proposed
Elk Creek operation. These commodities, especially niobium and
Sc2O3, are thinly traded without an
established publicly available price discovery mechanism. Hence,
detailed third-party market studies provide the basis for
assumptions used in the economic analysis.
The
economic analysis in the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study used the
2019 U.S. dollar base price of $47/kg Nb as the forward-looking
price for steel grade (65%) ferroniobium based on published
independent third-party reports. The base price is adjusted to a
realized price to account for the discount provisions contained in
the two ferroniobium offtake agreements that the Company has
concluded.
NioCorp engaged OnG Commodities LLC (“OnG”) to produce a market
assessment in April 2017. The study examines current scandium
production trends (approximately 20 tons/year) from existing
and emerging producers plus an outlook for supply to 2028. The
outlook then reviewed the current and emerging applications for
scandium, including fuel cells, aerospace, industrial and other
uses, plus an outlook for demand to 2028. Based on these inputs,
OnG provided pricing forecasts and global demand volumes by year to
2028 based estimated production costs and supply-demand balances.
The pricing sheet for the OnG Commodities report was updated for
NioCorp in 2019.
No
formal market study was done for TiO2 as it only
represents 2% of overall revenue in the economic analysis. All
market information for titanium and TiO2 is derived from
USGS Commodity Market Summaries (Bedinger, 2019).
Taxation Rates Included in the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility
Study
Taxes
that may be levied on the Elk Creek Project include corporate
income tax rates of 21% for federal and 5.84% for Nebraska. The Elk
Creek Project is eligible for federal depletion allowances and
credits, as well as various state incentives. The calculated
effective income tax rate for the Elk Creek Project is
16.42%.
Design Considerations for Environmental
Performance
The
current mine design incorporates these following strategies and
technologies designed to minimize environmental impacts of
operation:
|
● |
Zero
Process Liquid Discharge: The Elk Creek facility will now operate
as a “Zero Process Liquid Discharge” facility, with no releases of
process liquids. Instead, both naturally occurring, brackish
(slightly salty) water produced during mining operations, and water
used in ore processing, will be treated on site for use in
operations. A solid salt will be produced from water treatment
operations which will be stored on site. |
|
● |
Additional
Protection of Groundwater Resources Through Artificial Ground
Freezing: The Elk Creek Project’s new mine design will utilize
artificial ground freezing as part of the process of sinking the
production and ventilation shafts. Artificial ground freezing
creates a temporary frozen barrier that helps to protect
groundwater resources in the area while shaft-sinking operations
are underway. |
|
● |
Avoidance
of Permanent Impacts to Federally Jurisdictional Waters: We
designed the layout of the Elk Creek Project to minimize or avoid
permanent impacts to any federally jurisdictional waters and/or
wetlands on the property. This reduced the expected environmental
impacts and allowed the Elk Creek Project to secure a Clean Water
Act Section 404 permit from the USACE under the Nationwide Permit
program, a much more efficient and less expensive process than an
individual Section 404 permit. No other NEPA-level federal permits
are now expected to be required for the Elk Creek
Project. |
|
● |
Recycling
of Reagents Used in Mineral Processing: Metallurgical and process
breakthroughs that we accomplished in 2016 and 2017 are expected to
help reduce the volume of material planned for disposal in the Elk
Creek Project’s tailings storage areas. As more of this material is
recycled, the environmental footprint of the Elk Creek Project is
reduced. |
|
● |
Utilizing
Tailings as Underground Mine Backfill: We plan to fill underground
voids concurrently with mining operations using a paste backfill
material that contains mine waste material that typically would be
stored in above-ground mine tailings storage areas. |
The
Company has not identified any significant encumbrances to the
property it owns or holds under OTP agreements. The Company has not
had any permit violations or fines since the filing of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2021.
Permitting
requirements for the project have been identified. The Company
holds an Air Construction Permit from the State of Nebraska and a
Special Use Permit from Johnson County, both of which are necessary
to allow the start of project construction. In addition, the Elk
Creek Project will be required to obtain a series of permits for
operations from federal, state, and local agencies. The majority of
these permits are ministerial in nature and present minimal risk to
the Company, and typically involve the completion of an application
and the payment of a nominal fee. Three permits from the state of
Nebraska are discretionary in nature, where an application and fee
are provided to the state and the state must make a decision as to
whether or not the permit will be granted. While the risk involved
in such permits is low, such discretionary permits require more
processing time by the state and do require the state agency to
make a decision in favor of issuance of the permit. These three
permits include the following:
|
● |
Air
Operating Permit; and |
|
● |
Radioactive
Materials License. |
The
cost and schedule for obtaining both the discretionary and
ministerial permits is included in the overall execution plan for
the Elk Creek Project. Additional details on the project’s
permitting requirements can be found in Section 17 of the S-K 1300
Elk Creek Technical Report Summary.
Mineral Reserves and
Resources
The
mineral reserves and mineral resources disclosed below are based on
the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary. Mineral reserves
and mineral resources at the Elk Creek Project as of June 30, 2022
are summarized in the tables below. Further discussion and
background regarding the approaches used to establish mineral
reserves and mineral resources is contained in Chapters 11 and 12
of the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary.
Elk
Creek Project In Situ Mineral Resource Estimate (niobium, titanium,
and scandium) excluding reserves as of June 30, 2022
Class |
NSR
Cutoff |
Tonnage
(Mt) |
|
|
Indicated |
US$180 |
151.7 |
Nb2O5
(%) |
Nb2O5
(kt) |
0.43 |
649.8 |
TiO2
(%) |
TiO2
(kt) |
2.02 |
3,067 |
Sc
(ppm) |
Sc
(t) |
56.42 |
8,558 |
Inferred |
US$180 |
108.3 |
Nb2O5
(%) |
Nb2O5
(kt) |
0.39 |
426.6 |
TiO2
(%) |
TiO2
(kt) |
1.92 |
2,082 |
Sc
(ppm) |
Sc
(t) |
52.28 |
5,660 |
Elk
Creek Project In Situ Mineral Resource Estimate (rare earth oxides)
excluding reserves as of June 30, 2022
Class |
NSR
Cut-off |
Tonnage
(Mt) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicated |
US$180 |
151.7 |
La2O3
(%) |
La2O3
(kt) |
Ce2O3
(%) |
Ce2O3
(kt) |
Pr2O3
(%) |
Pr2O3
(kt) |
|
|
0.0766 |
116.2 |
0.1320 |
200.2 |
0.0140 |
21.3 |
|
|
Nd2O3
(%) |
Nd2O3
(kt) |
Sm2O3
(%) |
Sm2O3
(kt) |
Eu2O3
(%) |
Eu2O3
(kt) |
|
|
0.0511 |
77.5 |
0.0116 |
17.6 |
0.0040 |
6.0 |
|
|
Gd2O3
(%) |
Gd2O3
(kt) |
Tb2O3
(%) |
Tb2O3
(kt) |
Dy2O3
(%) |
Dy2O3
(kt) |
|
|
0.0096 |
14.6 |
0.0011 |
1.6 |
0.0044 |
6.7 |
|
|
Ho2O3
(%) |
Ho2O3
(kt) |
Er2O3
(%) |
Er2O3
(kt) |
Tm2O3(%) |
Tm2O3
(kt) |
|
|
0.0006 |
1.0 |
0.0015 |
2.2 |
0.0002 |
0.3 |
|
|
Yb2O3
(%) |
Yb2O3
(kt) |
Lu2O3
(%) |
Lu2O3
(kt) |
Y2O3
(%) |
Y2O3
(kt) |
|
|
0.0010 |
1.5 |
0.0001 |
0.2 |
0.0187 |
28.4 |
|
|
LREO
(%) |
LREO
(kt) |
HREO
(%) |
HREO
(kt) |
TREO
(%) |
TREO
(kt) |
|
|
0.2737 |
415.2 |
0.0528 |
80.0 |
0.3265 |
495.2 |
|
|
Inferred |
US$180 |
108.3 |
La2O3
(%) |
La2O3
(kt) |
Ce2O3
(%) |
Ce2O3
(kt) |
Pr2O3
(%) |
Pr2O3
(kt) |
|
|
0.0943 |
102.1 |
0.1576 |
170.6 |
0.0163 |
17.7 |
|
|
Nd2O3
(%) |
Nd2O3
(kt) |
Sm2O3
(%) |
Sm2O3
(kt) |
Eu2O3
(%) |
Eu2O3
(kt) |
|
|
0.0575 |
62.2 |
0.0116 |
12.6 |
0.0038 |
4.1 |
|
|
Gd2O3
(%) |
Gd2O3
(kt) |
Tb2O3
(%) |
Tb2O3
(kt) |
Dy2O3
(%) |
Dy2O3
(kt) |
|
|
0.0090 |
9.8 |
0.0010 |
1.1 |
0.0042 |
4.6 |
|
|
Ho2O3
(%) |
Ho2O3
(kt) |
Er2O3
(%) |
Er2O3
(kt) |
Tm2O3(%) |
Tm2O3
(kt) |
|
|
0.0006 |
0.7 |
0.0014 |
1.5 |
0.0002 |
0.2 |
|
|
Yb2O3
(%) |
Yb2O3
(kt) |
Lu2O3
(%) |
Lu2O3
(kt) |
Y2O3
(%) |
Y2O3
(kt) |
|
|
0.0010 |
1.1 |
0.0001 |
0.1 |
0.0182 |
19.7 |
|
|
LREO
(%) |
LREO
(kt) |
HREO
(%) |
HREO
(kt) |
TREO
(%) |
TREO
(kt) |
|
|
0.3257 |
352.6 |
0.0512 |
55.5 |
0.3769 |
408.1 |
|
|
Notes:
|
a. |
Classification
of mineral resources in the above tables is in accordance with the
S-K 1300 classification system. Mineral resources in this table are
reported exclusive of mineral reserves. |
|
b. |
Mineral
resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated
economic viability. |
|
c. |
The
mineral resources are reported at a Diluted Net Smelter Return
(NSR) Cut-off of US$180/tonne. |
|
d. |
The
diluted NSR is defined as: |
|
● |
Diluted
NSR (US$) = |
Revenue
per block Nb2O5 (diluted) + Revenue
per block TiO2 (diluted) + Revenue per block
Sc (diluted) |
Diluted
tonnes per block |
|
● |
The
diluted revenue from Nb2O5, TiO2,
and Sc per block used the following factors: |
|
● |
Nb2O5
Revenue: a 94% grade recovery, a 0.696 factor to convert
Nb2O5 to Nb, 82.36% assumption for plant
recovery, and a US$39.60 selling price per kg of ferroniobium as of
June 30, 2022. |
|
● |
TiO2 Revenue: a 94% grade
recovery, a 40.31% assumption for plant recovery, and an US$0.88
selling price per kg of titanium oxide as of June 30, 2022.
|
|
● |
Sc
Revenue: a 94% grade recovery, a 1.534 factor to convert Sc to
Sc2O3, 93.14% assumption for plant recovery,
and a US$3,675 selling price per kg of scandium oxide as of June
30, 2022. |
|
● |
The
diluted tonnes are a 6% increase in the total tonnes of the
block. |
|
e. |
Price
assumptions for FeNb, Sc2O3, and
TiO2 as shown in note d, above, are based upon
independent market analyses for each product. |
|
f. |
Numbers
may not sum due to rounding. The rounding is not considered to be
material. |
|
g. |
Rare
Earth Oxides (REO) were evaluated as a potential by-product to the
mining of niobium, titanium, and scandium; thus, the estimated
values of the REOs are reported using the previously determined
diluted NSR as derived from the Nb2O5,
TiO2, and Sc mineral resources and are assigned a price
of $0 |
|
h. |
The
stated Light Rare Earth Oxides (LREO) grade (%) is the summation of
La2O3 (%), Ce2O3 (%),
Pr2O3 (%), and Nd2O3
(%) estimates. |
|
i. |
The
stated Heavy Rare Earth Oxides (HREO) grade (%) is the summation of
Sm2O3 (%), Eu2O3 (%),
Gd2O3 (%), Tb2O3 (%),
Dy2O3 (%), Ho2O3 (%),
Er2O3 (%), Tm2O3 (%),
Yb2O3 (%), Lu2O3 (%),
and Y2O3 (%) estimates. |
|
j. |
The
stated Total Rare Earth Oxide (TREO) grade (%) is the summation of
LREO (%) and HREO (%). |
|
k. |
The
effective date of the mineral resource, including by-products, is
June 30, 2022. |
Elk
Creek Project Underground In Situ Mineral Reserves Estimate for Elk
Creek as of June 30, 2022
Classification |
Tonnage
(kt)
|
Nb2O5
Grade
(%)
|
Contained
Nb2O5
(t)
|
Payable
Nb
(t)
|
TiO2
Grade
(%)
|
Contained
TiO2
(t)
|
Payable
TiO2
(t)
|
Sc
Grade
(ppm)
|
Contained
Sc
(t)
|
Payable
Sc2O3
(t)
|
Proven |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Probable |
36,656 |
0.81 |
297,278 |
170,409 |
2.92 |
1,071,182 |
431,793 |
70.2 |
2,573 |
3,677 |
Total |
36,656 |
0.81 |
297,278 |
170,409 |
2.92 |
1,071,182 |
431,793 |
70.2 |
2,573 |
3,677 |
All
figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimates. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
|
● |
The
Qualified Person for the mineral reserve estimate is Optimize Group
Inc. The estimate has an effective date of June 30,
2022. |
|
● |
The
mineral reserve is based on the mine design, mine plan, and
cash-flow model utilizing an average cut-off grade of 0.679%
Nb2O5 with an NSR of US$180/mt. |
|
● |
The
estimate of mineral reserves may be materially affected by metal
prices, environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation,
socio-political, marketing, infrastructure development, or other
relevant issues. |
|
● |
The
economic assumptions used to define mineral reserve cut-off grade
are as follows: |
|
● |
Annual
life of mine (LOM) production rate of ~7,450 tonnes of FeNb/annum
during the years of full production. |
|
● |
Initial
elevated five-year production rate ~ 7,500 tonnes of FeNb/annum
when full production is reached. |
|
● |
Mining
dilution of ~6% was applied to all stopes and development, based on
3% for the primary stopes, 9% for the secondary stopes, and 5% for
ore development. |
|
● |
Mining
recoveries of 95% were applied in longhole stopes and 62.5% in sill
pillar stopes. |
Parameter |
Value |
Unit |
Mining
Cost |
42.38 |
US$/t
mined |
Processing |
106.70 |
US$/t
mined |
Water
Management and Infrastructure |
16.62 |
US$/t
mined |
Tailings
Management |
2.01 |
US$/t
mined |
Other
Infrastructure |
5.47 |
US$/t
mined |
General
and Administrative |
8.91 |
US$/t
mined |
Royalties/Annual
Bond Premium |
8.34 |
US$/t
mined |
Other
Costs |
6.29 |
US$/t
mined |
Total
Cost |
196.72 |
US$/t
mined |
Nb2O5
to Niobium Conversion
|
69.60 |
% |
Niobium
Process Recovery |
82.36 |
% |
Niobium
Price |
39.60 |
US$/kg |
TiO2
Process Recovery |
40.31 |
% |
TiO2
Price |
0.88 |
US$/kg |
Sc
Process Recovery |
93.14 |
% |
Sc to
Sc2O3 Conversion |
153.40 |
% |
Sc
Price |
3,675.00 |
US$/kg |
|
● |
Price
assumptions are as follows: FeNb US$39.60/kg Nb,
Sc2O3 US$3,675/kg, and TiO2
US$0.88/kg. Price assumptions are based upon independent market
analyses for each product as of June 30, 2022. |
|
● |
Price
and cost assumptions are based on the pricing of products at the
“mine-gate,” with no additional down-stream costs required. The
assumed products are ferroniobium (metallic alloy shots consisting
of 65%Nb and 35% Fe), a titanium dioxide product in powder form,
and scandium trioxide in powder form. |
|
● |
The
mineral reserve has an average LOM NSR of
US$563.06/tonne. |
|
● |
Optimize
Group has provided detailed estimates of the expected costs based
on the knowledge of the style of mining (underground) and potential
processing methods (by 3rd party Qualified Persons). |
|
● |
Mineral
reserve effective date is June 30, 2022. The financial model was
run after the estimate of the NSR above, which reflects a total
cost per tonne of US$196.72 versus US$189.91. This is not
considered a material change. |
|
● |
Price
variances for commodities are based on independent market studies
versus earlier projected pricing. The independent market studies do
not have a negative effect on the reserve. |
Comparison of Mineral Resources and
Mineral Reserves
The
following tables compares the Elk Creek Project mineral reserve
estimate as of June 30, 2022, to the Elk Creek Project mineral
reserve estimate as of June 30, 2021.
|
|
Nb2O5 |
Contained |
Payable |
TiO2 |
Contained |
Payable |
Sc |
Contained |
Payable |
|
Classification |
Tonnage
(kt) |
Grade
(%)
|
Nb2O5
(t)
|
Nb
(t)
|
Grade
(%)
|
TiO2
(t)
|
TiO2
(t)
|
Grade
(ppm)
|
Sc
(t)
|
Sc2O3
(t)
|
|
Mineral
Reserve, as of June 30, 2022 |
Proven |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Probable |
36,656 |
0.81 |
297,278 |
170,409 |
2.92 |
1,071,182 |
431,793 |
70.2 |
2,573 |
3,677 |
Total |
36,656 |
0.81 |
297,278 |
170,409 |
2.92 |
1,071,182 |
431,793 |
70.2 |
2,573 |
3,677 |
Mineral
Reserve, as of June 30, 2021 |
Proven |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Probable |
36,313 |
0.81 |
293,321 |
168,861 |
2.86 |
1,039,050 |
418,841 |
65.7 |
2,387 |
3,410 |
Total |
36,313 |
0.81 |
293,321 |
168,861 |
2.86 |
1,039,050 |
418,841 |
65.7 |
2,387 |
3,410 |
Percentage
Change |
Proven |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Probable |
1% |
0% |
1% |
1% |
2% |
3% |
3% |
7% |
8% |
8% |
Total |
1% |
0% |
1% |
1% |
2% |
3% |
3% |
7% |
8% |
8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
minor increases in probable mineral reserves were based on changes
made to the overall mining plan, which impacted the estimation of
the grade of ore to be mined and delivered to the surface
production plant.
The
reporting of our mineral resource under S-K 1300 is exclusive of
our mineral reserve, whereas in the prior year under NI 43-101
guidelines, our mineral resource was reported inclusive of our
mineral reserve. As the mineral resource as of June 30, 2022 and
2021, were calculated and reported under differing methodologies,
no meaningful comparison is available.
Environmental
and Social
A
number of key permits and environmental management requirements
have been identified for the Elk Creek Project, some of which need
to be implemented as soon as practicable in order to maintain the
proposed Elk Creek Project schedule.
|
● |
While
not necessarily complex, the timing generally required to complete
permitting through any federal regulatory agency requires that
NioCorp engage key agencies (in this case the USACE and possibly
the EPA) early on in Elk Creek Project development and consider the
siting and orientation of facilities carefully to minimize the risk
of a protracted National Environmental Policy Act analysis of the
Elk Creek Project. At the present time, the company believes that
we have completed the major federal permitting actions needed for
project construction, although changes to the design or location of
project facilities may require that additional federal permits be
obtained. |
|
● |
Construction
at the facility requires the Air Permit from the State of Nebraska,
which was issued to the Company on June 2, 2020. The Air Permit
describes all the prospective air emissions from the facility and
required the completion of an air quality model that demonstrates
compliance with the NAAQS. On April 15, 2022, the Company announced
that the NDEE advised the Company that periodic extensions to the
Elk Creek Project’s Air Permit are no longer required because the
Company has met the regulatory definition of “construction,
reconstruction, or modification of the source” since the permit was
issued. |
|
● |
A
radioactive materials license will be needed from the Nebraska
Department of Health and Human Services (“NDHHS”), Office of
Radiological Health. Because of their limited experience with hard
rock mining in the State of Nebraska, much less mining that
includes Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material, the NDHHS may
require additional information and more time to approve the Elk
Creek Project under a Broad Scope License. The Company has been
working with NDHHS on this aspect of project permitting since
2014. |
|
● |
Documentation
of existing baseline environmental conditions at the Elk Creek
Project site was initiated in 2014 and will continue as needed
throughout the permitting process. |
|
● |
Surface
water monitoring will continue throughout the permitting process
and extend into construction and operations as part of the
Environmental Management System and likely State of Nebraska permit
requirements. |
|
● |
A
wetland delineation and potential jurisdictional waters assessment
was conducted in late 2014 to identify wetland and drainage
features within the proposed Elk Creek Project boundary which
resulted in a formal JD being issued by the USACE on September 6,
2016. |
|
● |
The
major land-use authorization for the project was received from
Johnson County, Nebraska, on December 24, 2019, in the form of a
Special Use Permit for the project. This land-use permit is a
necessary precursor to any project-related construction activities.
County zoning permits will be required for individual buildings
constructed at the site, and the County requirement is that such
applications must be submitted five days before construction
commences. |
|
● |
Closure
costs for the Elk Creek Project have been estimated at just over
$44 million, including approximately $13.5 million for reclamation
and closure of the TSFs and $16.6 million for plant and building
removal and reclamation. |
|
● |
Community
engagement has occurred in parallel with Nebraska field operations
and has included public meetings, presentations to public agencies,
communications with local and state politicians, meetings with
environmental groups, and one-on-one meetings with area
landowners. |
Other
Elk Creek Project Activities
On
August 9, 2021, the Company announced the completion of the first
phase of testing of Elk Creek Project ore samples using HPGR
technology. Testing confirmed that the ore that NioCorp expects to
mine from the Elk Creek Project site, subject to receipt of
necessary funding, can be successfully processed using HPGR
technology, an energy efficient and low-emission alternative for
reducing the size of the ore to enable the recovery of niobium,
scandium, and titanium.
During
the quarter ended September 30, 2021, NioCorp completed an
engagement with Cementation US, Inc. (“Cementation”) to provide a
detailed cost estimate for the engineering associated with the
temporary and permanent construction associated with the Elk Creek
Project’s underground mine, along with a series of technical
reviews and optimization studies around key elements of the
existing mine design. Should project financing be obtained, this
work will accelerate Cementation’s ability to mobilize and commence
mine construction and may result in cost savings during project
execution should Cementation’s optimization recommendations be
adopted by the Company.
During
the quarter ended December 31, 2021, NioCorp engaged Olsson
Associates to assist with the preparation of an Equator Principles
program for the Company, which includes an environmental and social
assessment of the Elk Creek Project along with internal procedures
and management systems to formalize the Company’s longstanding
commitment to leading Environmental and Social Governance (“ESG”)
practices. The Equator Principles are used by signatory financing
entities to assess the ESG practices of financing
opportunities
At
present, the Company is maintaining the property in anticipation of
obtaining project financing that will facilitate the construction,
commissioning, and operation of the Elk Creek Project. The property
is characterized as a development stage property and is expected to
move to a production stage property should financing be
obtained.
Proposed
Activities
Our
long-term financing efforts continued through fiscal year 2022.
However, the COVID-19 pandemic and other recent worldwide events
have created general global economic uncertainty as well as
uncertainty in capital markets, supply chain disruptions, increased
interest rates, and the potential for geographic recessions. During
fiscal year 2022, these events continued to create uncertainty with
respect to overall project funding and timelines. The full extent
to these events may continue to impact our business will depend on
future developments, which continue to be highly uncertain and
cannot be predicted at this time.
As
funds become available through the Company’s fundraising efforts,
we expect to undertake the following activities:
|
● |
Continuation
of the Company’s efforts to secure federal, state and local
permits; |
|
● |
Continued
evaluation of the potential to produce rare earth
products; |
|
● |
Negotiation
and completion of offtake agreements for the remaining uncommitted
production from the project; |
|
● |
Negotiation
and completion of engineering, procurement and construction
agreements; |
|
● |
Completion
of the final detailed engineering for the underground portion of
the Elk Creek Project; |
|
● |
Initiation
and completion of the final detailed engineering for surface
project facilities; |
|
● |
Construction
of natural gas and electrical infrastructure under existing
agreements to serve the Elk Creek Project site; |
|
● |
Completion
of water supply agreements and related infrastructure to deliver
fresh water to the project site; |
|
● |
Initiation
of revised mine groundwater investigation and control
activities; |
|
|
● |
Initiation
of long-lead equipment procurement activities; and |
|
|
● |
Construction
and operation of a small-scale demonstration plant to address
process recommendations contained in the 2019 NI 43-101 Elk Creek
Technical Report and to quantify REE metallurgical
performance. |
Non-GAAP
Financial Performance Measures
Non-GAAP
financial performance measures are intended to provide additional
information only and do not have any standard meaning prescribed by
U.S. GAAP. These measures should not be considered in isolation or
as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance
with U.S. GAAP.
The
S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary uses non-GAAP financial
performance measures, such as EBITDA, Averaged Annual EBITDA, and
Averaged EBITDA Margin, for purposes of projecting the economic
results of the Elk Creek Project. We are unable to provide a
reconciliation of these forward-looking non-GAAP measures to the
most comparable U.S. GAAP financial performance measures because
certain information needed to reconcile those non-GAAP measures to
the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial performance measures is
dependent on future events, some of which are outside the control
of the Company, such as FeNb, Sc2O3 and
TiO2 prices, interest rates and exchange rates.
Moreover, estimating such U.S. GAAP measures with the required
precision necessary to provide a meaningful reconciliation is
extremely difficult and could not be accomplished without
unreasonable effort.
Corporate
Headquarters
We
lease our principal executive office space at 7000 South Yosemite
Street, Suite 115, Centennial, Colorado.
|
ITEM 3. |
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS |
As of September 6, 2022, we are not a party to any legal
proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s business, financial condition or operating results.
Further, to the Company’s knowledge, no such proceedings have been
threatened against the Company.
|
ITEM 4. |
MINE
SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Pursuant
to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, issuers that are
operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal
or other mine in the U.S. are required to disclose specified
information about mine health and safety in their periodic reports.
These reporting requirements are based on the safety and health
requirements applicable to mines under the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”) which is administered by the
U.S. Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration
(“MSHA”). During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, the Company
and its subsidiaries and their properties or operations were not
subject to regulation by MSHA under the Mine Act and thus no
disclosure is required under Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank
Act.
PART II
|
ITEM 5. |
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Market Information
The
Common Shares were first listed and posted for trading on the
Vancouver Stock Exchange on December 1, 1987. On March 9, 2015, the
Common Shares commenced trading on the TSX under the trading symbol
“NB.” In addition, the Company trades on the U.S. Over-the-Counter
Bulletin Board and the OTCQX under the symbol “NIOBF” and on the
Frankfurt Stock Exchange as “BR3.”
The
over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices
without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not reflect
actual transactions.
Holders
As of
June 30, 2022, we had 18,490 holders of record of the Common
Shares.
Dividends
We
have not paid any cash dividends on the Common Shares since our
inception and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the
foreseeable future. We plan to retain our earnings, if any, to
provide funds for the expansion of our business.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
See Equity
Compensation Plan Information under Item 12.,
“Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters,” for information on plans
approved by our shareholders.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Company
We
did not make any repurchases in the quarter ended June 30,
2022.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
The
following Common Shares were issued pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of
the Securities Act, in connection with the voluntary conversion of
a portion of the amount outstanding under the Lind III Convertible
Security and based upon representations and warranties of Lind III
in connection therewith.
Date
|
Conversion
Amount ($000) |
Shares
Issued |
Conversion
Price/Share |
June
22, 2022 |
$600 |
1,088,808 |
$0.7132 |
July
27, 2022 |
600 |
1,025,796 |
0.7504 |
August
8, 2022 |
250 |
431,286 |
0.7496 |
Exchange
Controls
There
are no governmental laws, decrees, or regulations in Canada that
restrict the export or import of capital, including foreign
exchange controls, or that affect the remittance of dividends,
interest or other payments to non-resident holders of the
securities of NioCorp, other than Canadian withholding tax. See
“Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S.
Residents” below.
Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S.
Residents
The
following summarizes certain Canadian federal income tax
consequences generally applicable under the Income Tax Act (Canada)
and the regulations enacted thereunder (collectively, the “Canadian
Tax Act”) and the Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention (1980) (the
“Convention”) to the holding and disposition of Common
Shares.
Comment
is restricted to holders of Common Shares each of whom, at all
material times for the purposes of the Canadian Tax Act and the
Convention, (i) is resident solely in the U.S., (ii) is entitled to
the benefits of the Convention, (iii) holds all Common Shares as
capital property, (iii) holds no Common Shares that are “taxable
Canadian property” (as defined in the Canadian Tax Act) of the
holder, (iv) deals at arm’s-length with and is not affiliated with
NioCorp, (v) does not and is not deemed to use or hold any Common
Shares in a business carried on in Canada, and (vi) is not an
insurer that carries on business in Canada and elsewhere (each such
holder, a “U.S. Resident Holder”).
Certain
U.S.-resident entities that are fiscally transparent for U.S.
federal income tax purposes (including limited liability companies)
may not in all circumstances be regarded by the Canada Revenue
Agency (the “CRA”) as entitled to the benefits of the Convention.
Members of or holders of an interest in such an entity that holds
Common Shares should consult their own tax advisers regarding the
extent, if any, to which the CRA will extend the benefits of the
Convention to the entity in respect of its Common
Shares.
Generally,
a holder’s Common Shares will be considered to be capital property
of the holder provided that the holder is not a trader or dealer in
securities, did not acquire, hold, or dispose of the Common Shares
in one or more transactions considered to be an adventure or
concern in the nature of trade (i.e. speculation), and does not
hold the Common Shares in the course of carrying on a
business.
Generally,
a holder’s Common Shares will not constitute “taxable Canadian
property” of the holder at a particular time at which the Common
Shares are listed on a “designated stock exchange” (which currently
includes the TSX) unless both of the following conditions are
true:
|
(i) |
at
any time during the 60-month period that ends at the particular
time, 25% or more of the issued shares of any class of the capital
stock of NioCorp were owned by or belonged to one or any
combination of: |
|
b. |
persons
with whom the holder did not deal at arm’s length, and |
|
c. |
partnerships
in which the holder or a person referred to in clause (B) holds a
membership interest directly or indirectly through one or more
partnerships, and |
|
(ii) |
at
any time during the 60-month period that ends at the particular
time, more than 50% of the fair market value of the Common Shares
was derived directly or indirectly from, one or any combination of,
real or immovable property situated in Canada, “Canadian resource
properties” (as defined in the Canadian Tax Act), “timber resource
properties” (as defined in the Canadian Tax Act), or options in
respect of, or interests in any of the foregoing, whether or not
the property exists. |
This
summary is based on the current provisions of the Canadian Tax Act
and the Convention in effect on the date hereof, all specific
proposals to amend the Canadian Tax Act and Convention publicly
announced by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance (Canada) on or
before the date hereof, and the current published administrative
and assessing policies of the CRA. It is assumed that all such
amendments will be enacted as currently proposed, and that there
will be no other material change to any applicable law or
administrative or assessing practice, although no assurance can be
given in these respects. Except as otherwise expressly provided,
this summary does not take into account any provincial,
territorial, or foreign tax considerations, which may differ
materially from those set out herein.
This
summary is of a general nature only, is not exhaustive of all
possible Canadian federal income tax considerations, and is not
intended to be and should not be construed as legal or tax advice
to any particular U.S. Resident Holder. U.S. Resident Holders are
urged to consult their own tax advisers for advice with respect to
their particular circumstances. The discussion below is qualified
accordingly.
A
U.S. Resident Holder who disposes or is deemed to dispose of one or
more Common Shares generally should not thereby incur any liability
for Canadian federal income tax in respect of any capital gain
arising as a consequence of the disposition.
A
U.S. Resident Holder to whom NioCorp pays or is deemed to pay a
dividend on the holder’s Common Shares will be subject to Canadian
withholding tax, and NioCorp will be required to withhold the tax
from the dividend and remit it to the CRA for the holder’s account.
The rate of withholding tax under the Canadian Tax Act is 25% of
the gross amount of the dividend but should generally be reduced
under the Convention to 15% (or, if the U.S. Resident Holder is a
company which is the beneficial owner of at least 10% of the voting
stock of NioCorp, 5%) of the gross amount of the dividend. For this
purpose, a company that is a resident of the U.S. for purposes of
the Canadian Tax Act and the Convention and is entitled to the
benefits of the Convention shall be considered to own the voting
stock of NioCorp owned by an entity that is considered fiscally
transparent under the laws of the U.S. and that it is not a
resident of Canada, in proportion to the Company’s ownership
interest in that entity.
|
ITEM 7. |
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The
following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”)
provides information that management believes is relevant to an
assessment and understanding of the consolidated financial
condition and results of operations of NioCorp and subsidiaries.
This item should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated
Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. Discussions related to fiscal year 2021
performance as compared to fiscal 2020 performance can be found in
Item 7., “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2021.
Summary of Consolidated Financial and Operating
Performance
|
|
|
For the
year ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
($000) |
|
Operating
expenses |
|
|
|
$ |
7,796 |
|
|
$ |
4,092 |
|
|
$ |
3,432 |
|
Net
loss |
|
|
|
9,929 |
|
|
4,390 |
|
|
4,001 |
|
Net
loss per share (basic and diluted) |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company’s net loss increased to $9.9 million for fiscal year 2022
from $4.4 million for fiscal year 2021. This increased net loss in
fiscal year 2022 as compared to fiscal year 2021 is primarily due
to increased exploration expenditures associated with process
development costs and rare earth review costs, as well increased
non-cash costs of our fiscal year 2022 Option grants, which were
fully vested and expensed on the grant dates.
The
Company had no revenues during the fiscal years presented below.
Operating expenses incurred related primarily to performing
exploration and feasibility study related activities, as well as
the activities necessary to support corporate and shareholder
duties and are detailed in the following table.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
the year ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($000) |
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
related costs |
|
|
$ |
2,150 |
|
|
$ |
1,655 |
|
|
$ |
1,376 |
|
Professional
fees |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Exploration
expenditures |
|
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
Other
operating expenses |
|
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
Total
operating expenses |
|
|
|
7,796 |
|
|
|
4,092 |
|
|
|
3,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Loss
on extinguishment |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Change
in financial instrument fair value |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
Foreign
exchange loss (gain) |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
(729 |
) |
|
|
179 |
|
Interest
expense |
|
|
|
1,906 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
Loss
(gain) on equity securities |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Income
tax benefit |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net
Loss |
|
|
$ |
9,929 |
|
|
$ |
4,390 |
|
|
$ |
4,001 |
|
Significant
items affecting operating expenses are noted below:
Employee
related costs for fiscal year 2022 increased as compared to
fiscal year 2021 primarily due to increased share-based
compensation costs which primarily reflected the impact of
increased Common Share values on the fair value calculations in the
Black-Scholes model, as well as the number of Options
granted.
Professional
fees increased in fiscal year 2022 as compared to fiscal year
2021, primarily due to the timing of legal services related to SEC
filings, including our shelf registration statement on Form S-3
filed in November 2021.
Exploration
expenditures increased in fiscal year 2022 as compared to
fiscal year 2021 reflecting work performed in fiscal year 2022 to
advance the development of a demonstration-scale test plant to
verify process improvement efforts as well as to potentially
incorporate REEs into our planned production. Fiscal year 2021
expenditures primarily related to the ongoing personnel costs, as
well as ongoing engineering and metallurgical projects and project
advancement activities.
Other
operating expenses include investor relations, general office
expenditures, equity offering and proxy expenditures, board-related
expenditures, and other miscellaneous costs. These costs increased
in fiscal year 2022 as compared to fiscal year 2021 primarily due
to increased financial advisory fees and investor relations fees
associated with our ongoing financing efforts. In addition,
share-based compensation for directors and other advisors increased
in fiscal year 2022 as compared to fiscal year 2021 due to
increased share-based compensation costs, which primarily reflected
the impact of increased Common Share values in the Black Scholes
model. Options issued in both periods were fully vested upon
issuance and expensed on the grant date.
Other
significant items impacting the change in the Company’s net loss
are noted below:
Other
income for fiscal year 2021 represents the one-time forgiveness
of the Company’s U.S. Small Business Administration Loan, which
occurred on November 18, 2020.
Loss
on extinguishment for fiscal year 2021 represents the one-time
loss incurred in connection with the December 18, 2020, conversion
of the Nordmin Note.
Foreign
exchange (gain) loss is primarily due to changes in the U.S.
dollar against the Canadian dollar rate as applied to U.S.
dollar-denominated debt instruments which are carried on the
Canadian parent company books, and the fiscal year 2022 loss
reflected the impacts of a strengthened U.S. dollar to Canadian
dollar, whereas the fiscal year 2021 gain primarily reflects the
impact of a weakened U. S. dollar.
Interest
expense increased in fiscal year 2022 as compared to fiscal
year 2021 primarily due to the accretion of the Nordmin Note, which
was issued in December 2020, as well as accretion of the Lind III
Convertible Security, which was issued in February 2021.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We
have no revenue generating operations from which we can internally
generate funds. To date, our ongoing operations have been financed
by the sale of our equity securities by way of private placements,
convertible securities issuances, and the exercise of incentive
stock options and share purchase warrants. While we believe we will
be able to secure additional private placement financings in the
future, we cannot predict the size or pricing of any such
financings. In addition, we may raise funds through the sale of
interests in our mineral properties, although current market
conditions and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have reduced
the number of potential buyers/acquirers of any such
interests.
As of
June 30, 2022, the Company had cash of $5.3 million and working
capital of $2.0 million, compared to cash of $7.3 million and
working capital of $3.4 million on June 30, 2021. The slight
decline in working capital surplus for fiscal year 2022 is due to
the timing of cash inflows from financing activities and warrant
exercises, as discussed below under “Financing Activities,”
and was partially offset by exploration-related expenditures and
general corporate overhead expenditures.
We
expect that the Company will operate at a loss for the foreseeable
future. The Company’s current planned operational needs are
approximately $9.5 million through June 30, 2023, inclusive of the
repayment of amounts outstanding under the Smith Credit Agreement
which is due on June 30, 2023.
In addition to outstanding accounts payable and short-term
liabilities, our average monthly expenditures through June 30, 2023
are expected to be approximately $550 per month where approximately
$295 is for corporate overhead, lease extensions and estimated
costs related to securing financing necessary for advancement of
the Elk Creek Project. Approximately $255 per month is planned for
expenditures relating to the advancement of the Elk Creek Project
by ECRC. The Company’s ability to continue operations and fund our
current work plan is dependent on management’s ability to secure
additional financing.
The
Company anticipates that it may not have sufficient cash to
continue to fund basic operations for the next twelve months, and
additional funds totaling $3.5 million to $4.5 million are likely
to be necessary to continue advancing the project in the areas of
financing, permitting, and detailed engineering. Management is
actively pursuing such additional sources of debt and equity
financing, and while it has been successful in doing so in the
past, there can be no assurance it will be able to do so in the
future.
Elk
Creek property and lease commitments are $8 through June 30, 2023,
exclusive of costs incurred to exercise our current land and
mineral right option agreements, which expire at various times
between December 2024 and May 2040. To maintain its currently held
properties and fund its currently anticipated general and
administrative costs and planned exploration and development
activities at the Elk Creek Project for the fiscal year ending June
30, 2023, the Company will likely require additional financing
during the current fiscal year. Should such financing not be
available in that timeframe, we will be required to reduce our
activities and will not be able to carry out all our presently
planned activities at the Elk Creek Project.
We
currently have no further material funding commitments or
arrangements for additional financing at this time (other than the
potential exercise of options and warrants) and there is no
assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing on
acceptable terms, if at all. There is significant uncertainty that
we will be able to secure any additional financing in the current
equity or debt markets. The quantity of funds to be raised and the
terms of any proposed equity or debt financing that may be
undertaken will be negotiated by management as opportunities to
raise funds arise. Management intends to pursue funding sources of
both debt and equity financing, including but not limited to the
issuance of equity securities in the form of Common Shares,
warrants, subscription receipts, or any combination thereof in
units of the Company pursuant to private placements to accredited
investors or pursuant to equity lines of credit or public offerings
in the form of underwritten/brokered offerings, at-the-market
offerings, registered direct offerings, or other forms of equity
financing and public or private issuances of debt securities
including secured and unsecured convertible debt instruments or
secured debt project financing. Management does not currently know
the terms pursuant to which such financings may be completed in the
future, but any such financings will be negotiated at arm’s-length.
Future financings involving the issuance of equity securities or
derivatives thereof will likely be completed at a discount to the
then-current market price of the Company’s securities and will
likely be dilutive to current shareholders.
Based
on the conditions described within, management has concluded and
the audit opinion and notes that accompany our financial statements
for the year ended June 30, 2022, disclose that substantial doubt
exists as to our ability to continue in business. The financial
statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been
prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going
concern. As defined under S-K 1300, we are a development stage
issuer, and we have incurred losses since our inception. The
Company anticipates that it may not have sufficient cash, including
warrant exercises subsequent to June 30, 2022, to continue to fund
basic operations for the next twelve months, therefore, additional
funds are likely to be necessary to continue advancing the project
in the areas of financing, permitting, and detailed engineering.
While the COVID-19 pandemic did negatively impact our ability to
obtain project financing during fiscal years 2021 and 2022, the
full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic and our precautionary
measures may continue to impact our business will depend on future
developments, which continue to be highly uncertain and cannot be
predicted at this time. In addition, recent worldwide events have
created general global economic uncertainty as well as uncertainty
in capital markets, supply chain disruptions, increased interest
rates, and the potential for geographic recessions. We believe that
the going concern uncertainty cannot be alleviated with confidence
until the Company has entered into a business climate where funding
of its planned ongoing operating activities is secured.
We
have no exposure to any asset-backed commercial paper. Other than
cash held by our subsidiaries for their immediate operating needs
in Colorado and Nebraska, all of our cash reserves are on deposit
with major U.S. and Canadian chartered banks. We do not believe
that the credit, liquidity, or market risks with respect thereto
have increased as a result of the current market conditions.
However, in order to achieve greater security for the preservation
of our capital, we have, of necessity, been required to accept
lower rates of interest, which has also lowered our potential
interest income.
Operating Activities
During
the year ended June 30, 2022, the Company’s operating activities
consumed $6.2 million of cash (2021: $4.7 million). The cash used
in operating activities for fiscal year 2022 reflects the Company’s
funding of losses of $9.9 million, partially offset by non-cash
adjustments and changes in working capital items. Overall, fiscal
year 2022 operational outflows were higher than fiscal year 2021
due primarily to increased exploration expenditures. Going forward,
the Company’s working capital requirements are expected to increase
substantially in connection with the development of the Elk Creek
Project.
Investing Activities
During
the year ended June 30, 2022, the Company’s investing activities
consumed $16 of cash (2021: $6.3 million). The cash used in
investing activities for fiscal year 2021 reflects the Company’s
purchase of the land and mineral rights discussed above under Part
I., Item 2, “Properties - Other Elk Creek Project
Activities.”
Financing Activities
Net
cash provided by financing activities was $4.3 million in fiscal
year 2022 (2021: $18.1 million). This decrease in financing inflows
primarily reflect the timing of cash inflows from the Lind III
Agreement, private placements, and warrant exercises during the
respective fiscal years.
The
following is a discussion of significant financing transactions for
fiscal year 2022:
|
● |
On
June 30, 2022, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement
(the “June 2022 Private Placement”) of units (the “Units”) of the
Company. A total of 4,981,035 Units were issued at a price per 2022
Unit of C$0.96, for total gross proceeds to the Company of
approximately C$4.8 million. Each Unit consists of one Common Share
and one common share purchase warrant (“June 2022 Warrant”). Each
June 2022 Warrant entitles the holder to acquire one Common Share
at a price of C$1.10 at any time prior to July 1, 2024. Proceeds of
the June 2022 Private Placement will be used for continued
advancement of the Company’s Elk Creek Critical Minerals Project
and for working capital and general corporate purposes. The Company
paid cash commissions of C$62 and 65,100 warrants (the “Finder
Warrants”), having the same terms as the June 2022 Warrants, to
finders outside of the United States. The Finder Warrants were
valued at C$18 using a risk-free rate of 3.2%, expected volatility
of 64% and expected life of two years. |
|
● |
On
July 23, 2021, the Company repaid $358 to Mr. Smith, representing a
partial principal repayment of $318 on the Smith Credit Agreement
plus accrued interest. |
Cash Flow Considerations
The
Company has historically relied upon equity financings, and to a
lesser degree, debt financings, to satisfy its capital requirements
and will continue to depend heavily upon equity capital to finance
its activities. The Company may pursue debt financing in the medium
term if it is able to procure such financing on terms more
favorable than available equity financing; however, there can be no
assurance the Company will be able to obtain any required financing
in the future on acceptable terms.
The
Company has limited financial resources compared to its proposed
expenditures, no source of operating income, and no assurance that
additional funding will be available to it for current or future
projects, although the Company has been successful in the past in
financing its activities through the sale of equity
securities.
The
ability of the Company to arrange additional financing in the
future will depend, in part, on the prevailing capital market
conditions and its success in developing the Elk Creek Project. Any
quoted market for the Common Shares may be subject to market trends
generally, notwithstanding any potential success of the Company in
creating revenue, cash flows, or earnings, and any depression of
the trading price of the Company’s Common Shares could impact its
ability to obtain equity financing on acceptable terms.
Historically,
the Company has used net proceeds from issuances of Common Shares
to provide sufficient funds to meet its near-term exploration and
development plans and other contractual obligations when due.
However, further development and construction of the Elk Creek
Project will require substantial additional capital resources. This
includes near-term funding and, ultimately, long-term funding
(including debt and equity financing) for Elk Creek Project
construction and other costs.
Debt Covenants
The
Lind III Convertible Security contains financial and non-financial
covenants customary for a facility of this size and nature, and
includes a financial covenant defining an event of default as all
present and future liabilities of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries, exclusive of related party loans, for an amount or
amounts exceeding C$2.0 million, and which have not been satisfied
on time or within 90 days of invoice, or have become prematurely
payable as a result of its default or breach. In addition, The
Smith Credit Agreement contains financial and non-financial
covenants customary for a facility of its size and nature. The
Company was in compliance with these covenants as of June 30,
2022.
Environmental
Our
mining and exploration activities are subject to various federal
and state laws and regulations governing the protection of the
environment. We have made, and expect to make in the future,
expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot
predict the full amount of such future expenditures. As of June 30,
2022 and 2021, we had accrued $48 and $48, respectively, related to
estimated environmental obligations.
Forward-Looking Statements
The
foregoing discussion and analysis, as well as certain information
contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, contain
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, and
are intended to be covered by the safe harbor created thereby. See
the discussion in “Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 1.,
“Business.”
Accounting Developments
For a
discussion of Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements and
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements, see Note 3 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note
3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. As described in Note 3, we are
required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts and related disclosures of assets, liabilities, revenue,
and expenses. Our estimates are based on our experience and our
interpretation of economic, political, regulatory, and other
factors that affect our business prospects. Many of the inputs into
our estimation process are subject to uncertainty over time and
therefore, actual results may differ significantly from our
estimates. Note 3 also discloses recent accounting pronouncements
applicable to the Company.
We
believe that our most critical accounting estimates are related to
the carrying value of our long term assets; accounting for income
taxes; and valuation of deferred tax assets, as they require us to
make assumptions that are highly uncertain at the time the
accounting estimates are made and changes in them are reasonably
likely to occur from period to period. Management has discussed the
development and selection of these critical accounting estimates
with the Audit Committee of our board of directors, and the Audit
Committee has reviewed the disclosures presented below. In
addition, there are other items within our financial statements
that require estimation, but are not deemed to be critical.
However, changes in estimates used in these and other items could
have a material impact on our financial statements.
Carrying Value of Long-Lived Assets
The
recoverability of the carrying values of mineral properties is
dependent upon economic reserves being discovered or developed on
the properties, permitting, financing, start-up, and commercial
production from, or the sale/lease of, or other strategic
transactions related to these properties. Development and/or
start-up of a project will depend on, among other things,
management’s ability to raise sufficient capital for these
purposes. We assess the carrying cost of our mineral properties for
impairment whenever information or circumstances indicate the
potential for impairment. Key inputs include events and
circumstances such as our inability to obtain all the necessary
permits, changes in the legal status of our mineral properties,
government actions, the results of exploration activities and
technical evaluations and changes in economic conditions, including
the price of commodities or input prices. Many of these inputs are
subjective and are subject to uncertainty over time. Such
evaluations compare estimated future net cash flows with our
carrying costs and future obligations on an undiscounted basis. If
it is determined that the estimated future undiscounted cash flows
are less than the carrying value of the property, an impairment
loss will be recorded, measured by the amount by which the carrying
amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Where
estimates of future net cash flows are not determinable and where
other conditions indicate the potential for impairment, management
uses available market information and/or third-party valuation
experts to assess if the carrying value can be recovered and to
estimate fair value.
We
review and evaluate our long-lived assets, other than mineral
properties, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
An impairment loss is measured and recorded based on the estimated
fair value of the long-lived assets being tested for impairment and
their carrying amounts.
Income Taxes
We
account for income taxes using the liability method, recognizing
certain temporary differences between the financial reporting basis
of our liabilities and assets and the related income tax basis for
such liabilities and assets. This method generates a net deferred
income tax liability or asset, as measured by the statutory tax
rates in effect. We derive our deferred income tax expense or
benefit by recording the change in the net deferred income tax
liability or asset balance for the year. With respect to the
earnings we derive from the operations of our consolidated
subsidiaries, in those situations where the earnings are
indefinitely reinvested, no deferred taxes have been provided on
the unremitted earnings (including the excess of the carrying value
of the net equity of such entities for financial reporting purposes
over the tax basis of such equity) of our consolidated
subsidiaries.
We
are subject to reviews of our income tax filings and other tax
payments, and disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over
the interpretation of its contracts or laws. We recognize and
record potential tax liabilities and record tax liabilities for
anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax
jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to
which, additional taxes will be due. We adjust these reserves in
light of changing facts and circumstances; however, due to the
complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution
may result in a payment that is materially different from our
current estimate. If our estimate of tax liabilities proves to be
different than the ultimate assessment, an additional expense or
benefit would result. We recognize interest and penalties, if any,
related to unrecognized tax benefits in Income tax benefit
(expense). In certain jurisdictions, we must pay a portion of
the disputed amount to the local government in order to formally
appeal the assessment. Such payment is recorded as a receivable if
we believe the amount is ultimately recoverable.
Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets
Our
deferred income tax assets include certain future tax benefits. We
record a valuation allowance against any portion of those deferred
income tax assets when we believe, based on the weight of available
evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the deferred income tax asset will not be realized. We review the
likelihood that we will realize the benefit of our deferred tax
assets and therefore the need for valuation allowances on a
quarterly basis, or more frequently if events indicate that a
review is required. In determining the requirement for a valuation
allowance, the historical and projected financial results of the
legal entity or consolidated group recording the net deferred tax
asset is considered, along with all other available positive and
negative evidence.