UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

☒     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2021

OR

☐     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 000-54509

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 800-947-9197

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by checkmark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act): Yes ☐ No ☒

On June 30, 2021, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1,451,996, based upon the closing price on that date of the common stock of the registrant on the OTC Link alternative quotation system of $1.50. For purposes of this response, the registrant has assumed that its directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of 5% or more of its common stock are deemed to be affiliates of the registrant.

As of April 14, 2022, the Company had 27,712,260 outstanding shares of common stock.

Documents incorporated by reference: None.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This report includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, which include but are not limited to, statements concerning our business strategy, plans and objectives, projected revenues, expenses, gross profit, income, and mix of revenue. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs and certain assumptions made by us. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” “potential,” “believes,” “seeks,” “hopes,” “estimates,” “should,” “may,” “will,” “with a view to” and variations of these words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements do not guarantee future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements.

Item 1. Business

Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Good Hemp, Inc. is referred to as “we,” “our,” “us,” the “Company,” or “Good Hemp.”

The Company was formed as a Nevada corporation on November 26, 2007. The Company was involved in exploration and development of mining properties until September 30, 2013, when it discontinued operations. In June 2017, the Company’s creditors filed a petition in the District Court of Harris County, Texas for the appointment of a receiver. In August of 2017, the court appointed a receiver (who was subsequently appointed as an officer and director of the Company), and in February 2018, the receiver appointed William Alessi as a director of the Company and then resigned as a director and officer of the Company.

On February 6, 2019, the Company acquired trademarks and intellectual property, which includes all rights and trade secrets to the hemp-derived CBD-infused line of consumer beverages sold under the “Good Hemp” brand. Since then, the Company has been conducting operations under the “Good Hemp” trade name and through the http://www.goodhemplivin.com/ website. Information on this website is not a part of this report on Form 10-Q.

On April 30, 2019, the Company acquired from Mr. Spoone the “CANNA HEMP” and “CANNA” trademarks including all rights and trade secrets and related inventory. At June 30, 2021, the Company had not attributed any value to these acquired trademarks.

On August 24, 2020, with an effective date of July 1, 2020, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with Paul Hervey (“Hervey”), an individual, for the purpose of cultivating hemp on approximately 9 acres of farmland and in approximately 3,700 square feet of greenhouse space in North Carolina (referred to as “Olin Farms”). In October 2021, Olin Farms ceased operations, and the limited liability company joint venture entity was dissolved in North Carolina.

On February 9, 2021, the Company formed Good Hemp Wellness, LLC, a limited liability company formed under the laws of the State of North Carolina, to sell CBD products to customers through chiropractic offices. In October 2021, this company was dissolved in North Carolina, and it is being treated as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements. The Company plans to sell Good Hemp Wellness CBD inventory directly.

On April 1, 2021, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase Diamond Creek Group, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company which sells the Diamond Creek brand of high alkaline water products, for a total purchase price of $643,000. On April 2, 2021, the Company closed the acquisition and paid the initial $500,000 portion of the purchase price, and on April 23, 2021, paid the $143,000 purchase price balance.

The Company is a North Carolina based company that is made up of industry veterans focused on exploiting niche markets in the beverage industry. The Company’s current products include high alkaline water products, hemp-based beverage products under the Good Hemp® brand, and CBD softgels under the Good Hemp Wellness brand. Good Hemp® products include two lines of hemp-based beverages described below. Good Hemp® products have been sold throughout the United States since 2016 via Amazon.com, as well as local retailers.

Products

Good Hemp® 2oh!, CANNA HEMP and CANNA are a line-up of refreshing, all-natural, “good-for-you”, ready-to-drink waters in six flavors: blueberry-blast, island coco-lime, kiwi-strawberry, lemon-twist, mango-fandango and Q-cumbermint. Each Good Hemp® 2oh! beverage is 16.9 fluid ounces infused with 10 mg of hemp oil (CBD rich), 6g of prebiotic fiber, has 0 g of sugar, contains no artificial sweeteners or artificial flavors, is gluten free, vegan, and contains 0 net carbs.

Good Hemp® fizz is a line-up of carbonated refreshing, all-natural, “good-for-you”, “ready-to-drink carbonated beverages in three flavors: blueberry-bam, mango-tango and citrus-twist. Each Good Hemp® fizz beverage is 12 fluid ounces infused with 10 mg of hemp oil (CBD rich), 6 g of prebiotic fiber, contains no artificial sweeteners or artificial flavors, is gluten free and vegan.

Good Hemp Wellness is a line of CBD soft gels that uses a proprietary super absorption formula which minimizes the nutrients lost during the digestive process and allows consumers to absorb more CBD in smaller doses.

Diamond Creek High Alkaline Water is a 9.5pH high alkaline natural spring water, sourced from the highest quality, award winning springs. Diamond Creek is available in one gallon, one liter and half liter bottles and aids in balancing the body’s pH while providing superior hydration resulting from a proprietary ionization process.

Our Growth Strategy & Recent Merger Agreements

We are focused on expanding our US distribution reach to service more national chain stores; increase awareness of our brands in the United States; securing additional chain, convenience and key account distributors and store listings for our brands nationwide and internationally; increasing our warehouse direct-to-retail channel.

We are looking for strategic acquisitions and partnerships in the beverage sector, such as Diamond Creek Group, LLC (“Diamond Creek”), which we acquired in 2021.

On March 8, 2022, we entered into a Plan and Agreement of Merger (the “PXS Merger Agreement”) with Petro X Solutions, Inc. (“PXS”), a Wyoming corporation, pursuant to which a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company will merge (the “PXS Merger”) with and into PXS, with PXS becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary as a result of the PXS Merger. Pursuant to the PXS Merger Agreement, an aggregate of 100,000,000 shares of Company common stock will be issued to the shareholders of PXS in the PXS Merger. The PXS Merger closing is to occur upon the satisfaction of several conditions, including (i) customary closing conditions, including the receipt of necessary approval from each of the Company and PXS, the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the other party, performance by the other party of its obligations under the PXS Merger Agreement, and the absence of any material adverse changes in the condition of the other party, and (ii) the reformation of promissory notes payable to our current management. Our management sees no impediment to the consummation of the PXS Merger.

PXS markets competitively-priced, environmentally-friendly products that are designed to work as well as or better than their toxic competitors. Its primary product, EnviroXstreamTM, is a plant-based, non-toxic, safe, yet powerful, cleaner/degreaser technology that expedites the natural bio-degradation process of hydrocarbons and other compounds. EnviroXstreamTM is currently a California South Coast AQMD-Certified Clean Air Solvent, and in the past has been, an EPA-designated Safer Choice product. EnviroXstreamTM distinguishes itself by its efficacy, which is buttressed by its “green” credentials.

On March 14, 2022, we entered into another Plan and Agreement of Merger dated March 9, 2022 (the "Restoration Merger Agreement"), with Restoration Artechs, Inc. ("Restoration"), a California corporation, pursuant to which a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company will merge (the "Restoration Merger") with and into Restoration, with Restoration becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary as a result of the Restoration Merger. Pursuant to the Restoration Merger Agreement, 25,000,000 shares of Company common stock will be issued to the shareholder of Restoration in the Restoration Merger. The Restoration Merger closing is to occur upon the satisfaction of several conditions, including (i) customary closing conditions, including the receipt of necessary approval from each of the Company and Restoration, the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the other party, performance by the other party of its obligations under the Restoration Merger Agreement, and the absence of any material adverse changes in the condition of the other party, and (ii) the reformation of promissory notes payable to our current management. Our management sees no impediment to the consummation of the Restoration Merger.

Restoration is a Carlsbad, California-based restoration service company specializing in surface restoration, especially commercial and residential stainless steel surfaces. Through its subsidiary, Barry’s Restore It All Products, LLC, it markets and sells to businesses and consumers Scratch-B-GoneTM, a stainless steel surface restoration kit, among other products.

Prominent Industry Acquisitions

Monster Beverage Corporation – In 2014, Coca Cola purchased a 16.7% stake in Monster for $2.15 billion. Monster’s sales over the last 12 months were more than $2.6 billion.

VOSS Water® - slightly more than a 50% interest was sold for $105 million to the Reignwood Group (the parent company of Red Bull China). Voss’s sales increased by 25% in 2015 to $77.5 million.

Vita Coco® - a 25% interest was sold for $165 million resulting in a valuation of $660 million. Vita Coco’s sales increased 31% in 2014 to $421 million.

Sweet Leaf Tea® and Tradewinds brands – Nestle purchased these brands for $100 million when sales were $53 million in 2010.

SUJA Juice - In 2015, Coca Cola invested $90 million for a 30% stake and the merchant banking arm of Goldman Sachs also agreed to pay $60 million for a 20% interest which places a value of $300 million. Sales were $42 million in 2014 and sales are projected to be more than $70 million for 2015.

Bai Brands - Dr Pepper Snapple has invested $15 million for a 3% interest which places a value of $500 million on the brand. Bai Brands was projecting sales of $125 million for 2015.

Vitamin Water® - Coca-Cola® purchased Vitamin Water® for a reported $4.1 billion when they were selling approximately 10 million cases per year and had approximately $200 million in sales.

SOBE® - Pepsi-Cola® purchased SOBE® for a reported $378 million when they were selling approximately 3 million cases per year and had approximately $60 million in sales.

FUZE® - Coca-Cola® purchased FUZE® for a reported $300 million when FUZE®, at the time, was selling approximately 7 million cases per year and had approximately $140m in sales.

Arizona Iced Tea® - turned down an offer from Coca-Cola® for $2.1 billion. At the time of the offer, Arizona Iced Tea® was selling approximately 25 million cases per year and had $500m in sales.

Industry Background

Non-alcoholic beverages are among the most widely distributed food products in the world and are being sold through more than 400,000 retailers in the United States, our core market. The United States has more than 2,600 beverage companies and 500 bottlers of beverage products. Collectively they account for more than $100 billion in annual sales. It is estimated that globally more than $300 billion worth of non-alcoholic beverages are sold annually. The beverage market is controlled by two giants, The Coca-Cola Company (“Coke”) and PepsiCo, combining for over 70% of the non-alcoholic beverage market. Carbonated beverage sales are slipping, while non-carbonated beverage sales are growing. The demand for “better-for you” and functional drinks are two of the fastest growing beverage categories. Experts predict that beverage companies that only offer carbonated beverages will have to work hard to off-set flagging demand. Industry watchers believe that growth will be largely confined to non-carbonated beverages and will chiefly affect functional drinks.

Bottled water maintains a steady growth pace, ranking at the top of beverage sales by volume in the United States. Total bottled water sales reached $18.1B from 2019-2020 seeing a 5.7% year over year growth. The global bottled water market size is expected to reach USD 505.19 billion by 2028, according to a new report by Grand View Research, Inc. It is expected to expand at a CAGR of 11.1% from 2021 to 2028. The growing awareness regarding the adverse health effects of consuming sugary drinks, such as weight gain, obesity, diabetes, and heart disease, is supporting the consumption of alternative beverages, such as still and sparkling water.

The growth of the market is primarily attributed to rising awareness regarding the importance of hydration. According to a study conducted by the International Bottled Water Association in 2018, it was revealed that 93% of American citizens want bottled water to be sold in most stores selling beverages. A substantial part of the population prefers to quench their thirst using bottled water over other beverages.

Increasing preference for nutrient-fortified water is trending owing to the rising importance of health and wellness among buyers. Bottled water demand has been increasing among travelers, working professionals, and for use in households.

Since the signing of the 2018 Farm Bill, there has been a significant boost in CBD store fronts, both brick and mortar, and online retailers across the country. In 2019, total sales of hemp-derived CBD consumer products in the U.S. were approximately $1.2 billion. In the last year, consumers likely have become more dependent on hemp-CBD products due to the events of 2020. We believe these and other factors are the reason some experts have projected CBD-related sales in 2020 to be nearly $2 billion and grow to $6.9 billion by 2025.

Distribution Systems

Our distribution strategy is comprised of traditional beverage distribution through established channels.

Direct Store Delivery (“DSD”) – DSD players, and regional and local distributors touch over 90% of retail chains in the US. DSDs primarily distribute beverages, chips, snacks and milk and provide pre-sales, delivery and merchandising services to their customers. Service levels are daily and weekly, and they require 25% to 30% gross profit from sales to their customers. We will grant these independent distributors the exclusive right in defined territories to distribute finished cases of one or more of our products through written agreements. These agreements typically include compensation to those distributors in the event we provide product directly to one of our regional retailers located in the distributor’s region. We will choose our distributors based on their perceived ability to build our brand franchise in convenience stores and grocery stores.

Direct to Retail Channel (“Warehouse Direct”) – We are targeting listings with large retail convenience store and grocery store chains where we ship direct to the chain stores warehousing system. Retailers must have warehousing and delivery capabilities. Services to retailers will be provided by an assigned broker, approved by us, to oversee pre-sale and merchandising services. Our direct to retail channel of distribution is an important part of our strategy to target large national or regional restaurant chains, retail accounts, including mass merchandisers and premier food-service businesses. Through these programs, we will negotiate directly with the retailer to carry our products, and the account is serviced through the retailer’s appointed distribution system. These arrangements are terminable at any time by these retailers or us and will contain no minimum purchase commitments.

Direct to Consumer – Our brands are available for direct retail purchase on Amazon and Goodhemplivin.com. Additionally, specialty stores can set up wholesale account at goodhemplivin.com.

Production Facilities

Our strategy is to outsource the manufacturing and warehousing of our products to independent contract manufacturers (“co-packers”). We purchase our raw materials from North American suppliers which deliver to our third-party co-packers. We use two or more co-packers to manufacture and package our products. Once our products are manufactured, we store finished product in a warehouse adjacent to each co-packer or in third party warehouses. Our co-packers have been chosen based on their proximity to markets covered by our distributors. Most of the ingredients used in the formulation of our products are off-the shelf and thus readily available. Under normal circumstances, no ingredient has a lead time greater than three-to-six weeks. Other than minimum case volume requirements per production run for most co-packers, we do not have annual minimum production commitments with our co-packers. Our co-packers may terminate their arrangements with us at any time, in which case we could experience disruptions in our ability to deliver products to our customers. We regularly review our contract packing needs considering regulatory compliance and logistical requirements and may add or change co-packers based on those needs.

Raw Materials

Substantially all the raw materials used in the preparation, bottling and packaging of our products are purchased by us or by our contract manufacturers in accordance with our specifications. The raw materials used in the preparation and packaging of our products consists primarily of juice concentrates, natural flavors, stevia, pure cane sugar, bottles, labels, trays and enclosures. These raw materials are purchased from suppliers selected by us or by our contract manufacturers. We believe that we have adequate sources of raw materials, which are available from multiple suppliers.

We purchase our flavor concentrate from several flavor concentrate suppliers. Generally, all natural flavor suppliers own the proprietary rights to the flavors. The development of new products and flavors, independent suppliers bear a large portion of the expense for product development, thereby enabling us to develop new products and flavors at relatively low cost. We anticipate that for future flavors and additional products, we may purchase flavor concentrate from other flavor houses with the intention of developing other sources of flavor concentrate for each of our products. If we must replace a flavor supplier, we could experience disruptions in our ability to deliver products to our customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

New Product Development

Our product philosophy will continue to be based on developing products in those segments of the market that offer the greatest chance of success such as health, wellness and natural refreshment and rehydration, and we will continue to seek out underserved market niches. We believe we can quickly respond, given our technical and marketing expertise, to changing market conditions with new and innovative products. We are committed to developing products that are distinct, meet a quantifiable need, are proprietary, lend themselves to a markup on production costs of least a 60%, project a quality and healthy image, and can be distributed through existing distribution channels. We are identifying brands of other companies with a view to acquiring them or taking on the exclusive distribution of their products.

Intellectual Property

We own the following intellectual property: Good Hemp® trademark, Good Hemp 2oh!, Good Hemp fizz!, Canna Hemp and Canna beverage formulations.

Seasonality

Our sales are expected to be seasonal and experience fluctuations in quarterly results because of many factors. Historically, the industry experiences an increase in revenues during the warm weather months of April through September. Timing of customer purchases will vary each year and sales can be expected to shift from one quarter to another. Thus, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as any indication of future performance or results expected for the entire fiscal year.

Other Information

As of December 31, 2021, the Company had two employees.

The Company’s office is located at 20311 Chartwell Center Drive, Ste. 1469, Cornelius, North Carolina, 28031.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Risks Related to our Financial Condition and Capital Requirements

We have experienced recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows from operating activities and anticipate that we will continue to incur operating losses in the future.

We have experienced recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows from operating activities. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses related to our ongoing operations and generate operating losses for the foreseeable future. The size of our losses will depend, in part, on the rate of future expenditures and our ability to generate revenues. We incurred a net loss of approximately $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, and our accumulated deficit increased to approximately $13.2 million as of December 31, 2021.

We may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays, and other unknown factors that may adversely affect our financial condition. Our prior losses and expected future losses have had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on our financial condition. If our products do not achieve sufficient market acceptance and our revenues do not increase significantly, we may never become profitable. Even if we achieve profitability in the future, we may not be able to sustain profitability in subsequent periods. Our failure to become and remain profitable would decrease the value of our company and could impair our ability to raise capital, expand our business, diversify our product offerings or continue our operations. A decline in the value of our company could cause you to lose all or part of your investment.

If we are not able to successfully execute on our future operating plans, our financial condition and results of operation may be materially adversely affected, and we may not be able to continue as a going concern.

It is critical that we meet our sales goals and increase sales going forward as our operating plan already reflects prior significant cost containment measures and may make it difficult to achieve top-line growth if further significant reductions become necessary. If we do not meet our sales goals, our available cash and working capital will decrease and our financial condition will be negatively impacted.

We may need additional financing in the future, which may not be available when needed or may be costly and dilutive.

We will require additional financing to support our working capital needs in the future. The amount of additional capital we may require, the timing of our capital needs and the availability of financing to fund those needs will depend on a number of factors, including our strategic initiatives and operating plans, the performance of our business and the market conditions for debt or equity financing. Additionally, the amount of capital required will depend on our ability to meet our sales goals and otherwise successfully execute our operating plan. We believe it is imperative that we meet these sales objectives in order to lessen our reliance on external financing in the future. We intend to continually monitor and adjust our operating plan as necessary to respond to developments in our business, our markets and the broader economy. Although we believe various debt and equity financing alternatives will be available to us to support our working capital needs, financing arrangements on acceptable terms may not be available to us when needed. Additionally, these alternatives may require significant cash payments for interest and other costs or could be highly dilutive to our existing shareholders. Any such financing alternatives may not provide us with sufficient funds to meet our long-term capital requirements. If necessary, we may explore strategic transactions that we consider to be in the best interest of the company and our shareholders, which may include, without limitation, public or private offerings of debt or equity securities, a rights offering, and other strategic alternatives; however, these options may not ultimately be available or feasible when needed.

If we are unable to continue as a going concern, our securities will have little or no value.

Although our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, were prepared under the assumption that we would continue our operations as a going concern, the report of our independent registered public accounting firm that accompanies our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, contains a going concern qualification in which such firm expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, based on the financial statements at that time. Specifically, as noted above, we have experienced recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows from operating activities, and we expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future. These prior losses and expected future losses have had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on our financial condition. In addition, as noted above, continued operations and our ability to continue as a going concern may be dependent on our ability to obtain additional financing in the near future and thereafter, and there are no assurances that such financing will be available to us at all or will be available in sufficient amounts or on reasonable terms. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. If we are unable to generate additional funds in the future through sales of our products, financings or from other sources or transactions, we will exhaust our resources and will be unable to continue operations. If we cannot continue as a going concern, our shareholders would likely lose most or all of their investment in us.

We have a limited operating history.

The Company, while incorporated in 2007, began carrying on its current beverage business in 2019 and did not generate revenue from the sale of products until that year. We are therefore subject to many of the risks common to early-stage enterprises, including under-capitalization, cash shortages, limitations with respect to personnel, financial, and other resources and lack of revenues. There is no assurance that we will be successful in achieving a return on shareholders’ investment, and the likelihood of success must be considered in light of the early stage of our beverage operations.

We may incur significant debt to finance our operations.

There is no assurance that we will not incur debt in the future, that we will have sufficient funds to repay our indebtedness, or that we will not default on our debt, jeopardizing our business viability. Furthermore, we may not be able to borrow or raise additional capital in the future to meet the Company’s needs or to otherwise provide the capital necessary to conduct our business.

Risk Factors Relating to Our Business and Industry

We compete in an industry that is brand-conscious, so brand name recognition and acceptance of our products are critical to our success.

Our business is substantially dependent upon awareness and market acceptance of our products and brands by our target market: trendy, young and/or health-conscious consumers looking for a distinctive tonality and/or the perceived benefits of hemp in their beverage choices. In addition, our business depends on acceptance by our independent distributors and retailers of our brands as beverage brands that have the potential to provide incremental sales growth. If we are not successful in the growth of our brand and product offerings, we may not achieve and maintain satisfactory levels of acceptance by independent distributors and retail consumers. In addition, we may not be able to effectively execute our marketing strategies in light of the various closures and event cancellations caused by the COVID-19 outbreak. Any failure of our brands to maintain or increase acceptance or market penetration would likely have a material adverse effect on our revenues and financial results.

Our brand and image are keys to our business and any inability to maintain a positive brand image could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our success depends on our ability to maintain brand image for our existing products and effectively build up brand image for new products and brand extensions. We cannot predict whether our advertising, marketing and promotional programs will have the desired impact on our products’ branding and on consumer preferences. In addition, negative public relations and product quality issues, including negative perceptions regarding the hemp industry, whether real or imagined, could tarnish our reputation and image of the affected brands and could cause consumers to choose other products. Our brand image can also be adversely affected by unfavorable reports, studies and articles, litigation, or regulatory or other governmental action, whether involving our products or those of our competitors.

Competition from traditional and large, well-financed non-alcoholic beverage manufacturers may adversely affect our distribution relationships and may hinder development of our existing markets, as well as prevent us from expanding our markets.

The beverage industry is highly competitive. We compete with other beverage companies not only for consumer acceptance but also for shelf space in retail outlets and for marketing focus by our distributors, all of whom also distribute other beverage brands. Our products compete with all non-alcoholic beverages, most of which are marketed by companies with substantially greater financial resources than ours. Some of these competitors are placing severe pressure on independent distributors not to carry competitive hemp brands such as ours. We also compete with regional beverage producers and “private label” soft drink suppliers.

Our direct competitors in the sparkling, flavored-water, and energy drink beverage categories include traditional large beverage companies and distributors, and regional premium soft and energy drink companies. These national and international competitors have advantages such as lower production costs, larger marketing budgets, greater financial and other resources and more developed and extensive distribution networks than ours. We may not be able to grow our volumes or maintains our selling prices, whether in existing markets or as we enter new markets.

Increased competitor consolidations, market-place competition, particularly among branded beverage products, and competitive product and pricing pressures could impact our earnings, market share and volume growth. If, due to such pressure or other competitive threats, we are unable to sufficiently maintain or develop our distribution channels, we may be unable to achieve our current revenue and financial targets. As a means of maintaining and expanding our distribution network, we intend to introduce product extensions and additional brands. We may not be successful in doing this, or it may take us longer than anticipated to achieve market acceptance of these new products and brands, if at all. Other companies may be more successful in this regard over the long term. Competition, particularly from companies with greater financial and marketing resources than ours, could have a material adverse effect on our existing markets, as well as on our ability to expand the market for our products.

We compete in an industry characterized by rapid changes in consumer preferences and public perception, so our ability to continue developing new products to satisfy our consumers’ changing preferences will determine our long-term success.

Failure to introduce new brands, products or product extensions into the marketplace as current ones mature and to meet our consumers’ changing preferences could prevent us from gaining market share and achieving long-term profitability. Product lifecycles can vary, and consumers’ preferences and loyalties change over time. Although we try to anticipate these shifts and innovate new products to introduce to our consumers, we may not succeed. Customer preferences also are affected by factors other than taste, such as health and nutrition considerations and obesity concerns, shifting consumer needs, changes in consumer lifestyles, increased consumer information and competitive product and pricing pressures. Sales of our products may be adversely affected by the negative publicity associated with these issues. In addition, there may be a decreased demand for our products as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak. If we do not adequately anticipate or adjust to respond to these and other changes in customer preferences, we may not be able to maintain and grow our brand image and our sales may be adversely affected.

We may experience a reduced demand for some of our products due to health concerns (including obesity) and legislative initiatives against sweetened beverages.

Consumers are concerned about health and wellness; public health officials and government officials are increasingly vocal about obesity and its consequences. There has been a trend among some public health advocates and dietary guidelines to recommend a reduction in sweetened beverages, as well as increased public scrutiny, new taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (as described below), and additional governmental regulations concerning the marketing and labeling/packing of the beverage industry. Additional or revised regulatory requirements, whether labeling, tax or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Further, increasing public concern with respect to sweetened beverages could reduce demand for our sweetened beverage products.

Legislative or regulatory changes that affect our products, including new taxes, could reduce demand for products or increase our costs.

Taxes imposed on the sale of certain of our products by federal, state, and local governments in the United States, or other countries in which we operate could cause consumers to shift away from purchasing our beverages. Several municipalities in the United States have implemented or are considering implementing taxes on the sale of certain “sugared” beverages, including non-diet soft drinks, fruit drinks, energy drinks, teas, and flavored waters to help fund various initiatives. These taxes could materially affect our business and financial results as we current sell flavored water beverages, sparkling beverages, and energy drink beverages.

Our ability to develop and commercialize hemp beverages and comply with laws and regulations governing cannabis, hemp or related products will affect our operational results.

As of December 31, 2021, approximately forty-eight states authorized industrial hemp programs pursuant to the 2018 farm bill (the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018, the “2018 Farm Bill”), which legalized the regulated production of hemp.

The 2018 Farm Bill was signed into law on December 20, 2018. The 2018 Farm Bill removed hemp from the U.S. Controlled Substances Act (the “CSA”) and established a federal regulatory framework for hemp production in the United States. Among other provisions, the 2018 Farm Bill: (a) explicitly amends the CSA to exclude all parts of the cannabis plant (including its cannabinoids, derivatives, and extracts) containing a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis from the CSA’s definition of “marihuana”; (b) permits the commercial production and sale of hemp; (c) precludes states, territories, and Indian tribes from prohibiting the interstate transport of lawfully-produced hemp through their borders; and (d) establishes the USDA as the primary federal agency regulating the cultivation of hemp in the United States, while allowing states, territories, and Indian tribes to obtain (or retain) primary regulatory authority over hemp activities within their borders after receiving approval of their proposed hemp production plan from the USDA. Any such plan submitted by a state, territory, or Indian tribe to the USDA must meet or exceed minimum federal standards and receive USDA approval. Any state, territory, or Indian tribe that does not submit a plan to the USDA, or whose plan is not approved by the USDA, will be regulated by the USDA; provided that, states retain the ability to prohibit hemp production within their borders.

Marijuana continues to be classified as a Schedule I substance under the CSA. As a result, any cannabinoids (including CBD) derived from marijuana, as opposed to hemp, or any products derived from hemp containing in excess of 0.3% THC on a dry-weight basis, remain Schedule I substances under U.S. federal law. Cannabinoids derived from hemp are indistinguishable from those derived from marijuana, and confusion surrounding the nature of our beverage products containing CBD and any hemp we cultivate and sale in connection with our joint venture with Hervey to cultivate hemp, inconsistent interpretations of the definition of “hemp”, inaccurate or incomplete testing, farming practices and law enforcement vigilance or lack of education could result in our products being intercepted by federal and state law enforcement as marijuana and could interrupt and/or have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business. The Company could be required to undertake processes that could delay shipments, impede sales or result in seizures, proper or improper, that would be costly to rectify or remove and which could have a material adverse effect on the business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition of the Company. If the Company mistakes in processing or labeling and THC in excess of 0.3% on a dry-weight basis was found in our products, the Company could be subject to enforcement and prosecution under local, state, and federal laws which would have a negative impact on the Company’s business and operations.

Under the 2018 Farm Bill, states have authority to adopt their own regulatory regimes, and as such, regulations will likely continue to vary on a state-by-state basis. States take varying approaches to regulating the production and sale of hemp and hemp-derived products under state food and drug laws. The variance in state law and that state laws governing hemp production are rapidly changing may increase the chance of unfavorable law enforcement interpretation of the legality of Company’s operations as they relate to the cultivation of hemp. Further, such variance in state laws that may frequently change increases the Company’s compliance costs and risk of error.

While some states explicitly authorize and regulate the production and sale of hemp products or otherwise provide legal protection for authorized individuals to engage in commercial hemp activities, other states maintain outdated drug laws that do not distinguish between marijuana, hemp and/or hemp-derived CBD, resulting in hemp being classified as a controlled substance under state law. In these states, sale of CBD, notwithstanding origin, is either restricted to state medical or adult-use marijuana program licensees or remains otherwise unlawful under state criminal laws. Variance in hemp regulation across jurisdictions is likely to persist. This patchwork of state laws may, for the foreseeable future, materially impact the Company’s business and financial condition, limit the accessibility of certain state markets, cause confusion amongst regulators, and increase legal and compliance costs.

There are no express protections in the United States under applicable federal or state law for possessing or processing hemp biomass derived from lawful hemp not exceeding 0.3% THC on a dry weight basis and intended for use in finished product, but that may temporarily exceed 0.3% THC during the interim processing stages. While it is a common occurrence for hemp biomass to have variance in THC content during interim processing stages after cultivation but prior to use in finished products, there is risk that state or federal regulators or law enforcement could take the position that such hemp biomass is a Schedule I controlled substance in violation of the CSA and similar state laws. Further, there is a risk that North Carolina state regulators (where hemp will be cultivated pursuant to our joint venture with Paul Hervey) and/or law enforcement may interpret provisions of North Carolina law prohibiting unlawful marijuana activity to apply to in-process hemp at any joint venture facility so that such activity is considered unlawful under state law.

In the event that the Company’s operations are deemed to violate any laws or if we are deemed to be assisting others to violate a state or federal law, the Company could be subject to enforcement actions and penalties, and any resulting liability could cause the Company to modify or cease its operations.

Continued development of the industrial hemp and cannabis industries will be dependent upon new legislative authorization of industrial hemp and cannabis at the state level, and further amendment or supplementation of legislation at the federal level. Any number of events or occurrences could slow or halt progress all together in this space. While progress within the industrial hemp and cannabis industries is currently encouraging, growth is not assured. While there appears to be ample public support for favorable legislative action, numerous factors may impact or negatively affect the legislative process(es) within the various states where we have business interests. Any one of these factors could slow or halt use of industrial hemp and cannabis, which could negatively impact our business and financial results.

In addition, the general manufacture, labeling and distribution of our beverage products is regulated by various federal, state, and local agencies. These governmental authorities may commence regulatory or legal proceedings, which could restrict the permissible scope of our product claims or the ability to sell products in the future. The FDA regulates our products to ensure that the products are not adulterated or misbranded. In particular, we would be subject to regulation by the federal government and other state and local agencies as a result of the development and commercialization of cannabidiol (CBD) products. The shifting compliance environment and the need to build and maintain robust systems to comply with different compliance in multiple jurisdictions increases the possibility that we may violate one or more of the requirements. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of such laws or any other governmental regulations that apply to our business, we may be subject to penalties, including, without limitation, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect the ability to operate our business and its financial results.

International expansion efforts would likely significantly increase our operational expenses.

We may in the future expand into other geographic areas, which could increase our operational, regulatory, compliance, reputational and foreign exchange rate risks. The failure of our operating infrastructure to support such expansion could result in operational failures and regulatory fines or sanctions. Future international expansion could require us to incur a number of up-front expenses, including those associated with obtaining regulatory approvals, as well as additional ongoing expenses, including those associated with infrastructure, staff and regulatory compliance. We may not be able to successfully identify suitable acquisition and expansion opportunities or integrate such operations successfully with our existing operations.

Our reliance on distributors, retailers and brokers could affect our ability to efficiently and profitably distribute and market our products, maintain our existing markets and expand our business into other geographic markets.

Our ability to maintain and expand our existing markets for our products, and to establish markets in new geographic distribution areas, is dependent on our ability to establish and maintain successful relationships with reliable distributors, retailers and brokers strategically positioned to serve those areas. Most of our distributors, retailers and brokers sell and distribute competing products, including non-alcoholic and alcoholic beverages, and our products may represent a small portion of their businesses. The success of our distribution network will depend on the performance of the distributors, retailers, and brokers in our network. There is a risk they may not adequately perform their functions within the network by, without limitation, failing to distribute to sufficient retailers or positioning our products in localities that may not be receptive to our product. Our ability to incentivize and motivate distributors to manage and sell our products is affected by competition from other beverage companies who have greater resources than we do. To the extent that our distributors, retailers and brokers are distracted from selling our products or do not employ sufficient efforts in managing and selling our products, including re-stocking the retail shelves with our products, our sales and results of operations could be adversely affected. Furthermore, such third parties’ financial position or market share may deteriorate, which could adversely affect our distribution, marketing and sales activities.

Our ability to maintain and expand our distribution network and attract additional distributors, retailers and brokers will depend on a number of factors, some of which are outside our control. Some of these factors include:

We may not be able to successfully manage all or any of these factors in any of our current or prospective geographic areas of distribution. Our inability to achieve success with regards to any of these factors in a geographic distribution area will have a material adverse effect on our relationships in that particular geographic area, thus limiting our ability to maintain or expand our market, which will likely adversely affect our revenues and financial results.

We incur significant time and expense in attracting and maintaining key distributors, and loss of distributors or retails accounts would harm our business.

Our marketing and sales strategy depends in large part on the availability and performance of our independent distributors. We currently do not have, nor do we anticipate in the future that we will be able to establish, long-term contractual commitments from some of our distributors. We may not be able to maintain our current distribution relationships or establish and maintain successful relationships with distributors in new geographic distribution areas. Moreover, there is the additional possibility that we may have to incur additional expenditures to attract and maintain key distributors in one or more of our geographic distribution areas in order to profitably exploit our geographic markets.

If we lose distributors or national or regional retail accounts, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. While we continually seek to expand and upgrade our distributor network and retail relationships, we may not be able to maintain our distributor or retailer base. The loss of any of our distributors or retail accounts could have adverse effects on our revenues, liquidity and financial results, could negatively impact our ability to retain our relationships with our other distributors and our ability to expand our market, and would place increased dependence on our other independent distributors and national accounts.

We rely on suppliers, manufacturers and contractors, and events adversely affecting them would adversely affect us.

The Company intends to maintain a full supply chain for the provision of its hemp-based beverage products. Due to the novel and variable regulatory landscape for hemp and CBD production in the United States, the Company’s third-party hemp and beverage suppliers, manufacturers and contractors may elect, at any time, to decline or withdraw services necessary for the Company’s operations. Loss of these suppliers, manufacturers and contractors, including for non-hemp-based ingredients in the Company’s beverage products, may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

In addition, any significant interruption, negative change in the availability or economics of the supply chain or increase in the prices for the ingredients in the Company’s products provided by any such third-party suppliers, manufacturers and contractors could materially impact the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Any inability to secure required supplies or to do so on appropriate terms could have a materially adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Wholesale price volatility may adversely affect operations.

The beverage industry is margin-based with gross profits typically dependent on the excess of sales prices over costs. Consequently, profitability is sensitive to fluctuations in wholesale and retail prices caused by changes in supply (which itself depends on other factors such as weather, fuel, equipment and labor costs, shipping costs, economic situation and demand), taxes, government programs and policies for the beverage and hemp industries (including price controls and wholesale price restrictions that may be imposed by government agencies responsible for the regulation of sweetened beverages and hemp), and other market conditions, all of which are factors beyond the control of the Company. The Company’s operating income will be sensitive to changes in the price of hemp and other beverage ingredients, and the overall condition of the beverage and hemp industries, as the Company’s profitability is directly related to the price of hemp and our other beverage ingredients. There is currently not an established market price for hemp, and the price of hemp is affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control. Ingredient price volatility may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Results of future clinical research could reduce the demand for hemp beverage products.

To date, there is limited standardization in the research of the effects of hemp and hemp-based CBD, and future clinical research studies may lead to conclusions that dispute or conflict with the Company’s understanding and belief regarding the medical benefits, viability, safety, efficacy, dosing and social acceptance of hemp and hemp-based CBD. Research in the United States and internationally regarding the medical benefits, viability, safety, efficacy and dosing of hemp and isolated cannabinoids (such as CBD) remains in relatively early stages.

Future research and clinical trials may draw opposing conclusions to statements in this prospectus or could reach different or negative conclusions regarding the medical benefits, viability, safety, efficacy, dosing or other facts and perceptions related to hemp and CBD, which could adversely affect social acceptance of hemp and CBD products and the demand for the Company’s beverage products.

The Company may sustain losses that cannot be recovered through insurance or other preventative measures.

There is no assurance that the Company will not incur uninsured liabilities and losses as a result of the conduct of its business. While the Company currently has some liability insurance coverage, once capital is available to purchase additional liability insurance, the Company plans to increase its comprehensive liability insurance. The Company also intends to evaluate the availability and cost of property casualty and business interruption insurance, neither of which the Company currently has. Should uninsured losses occur, shareholders could lose their invested capital.

The Company may be subject to product liability claims and other claims of our customers and partners.

The sale of beverage products to consumers involves a certain level of risk of product liability claims and the associated adverse publicity. Because consumption of the Company’s beverage products could cause injury to consumers if packaging or ingredients are defective, we are subject to a risk of claims for such injuries and damages. We could also be named as co-parties in product liability suits that are brought against manufacturing partners that produce our beverage products, packaging for those products, or the ingredients in those products.

In addition, our customers and partners may bring suits against us alleging damages for the failure of our products to meet stated specifications or other requirements. Any such suits, even if not successful, could be costly, disrupt the attention of our management and damage our negotiations with distributors and/or customers. Any attempt by us to limit our product liability in our contracts may not be enforceable or may be subject to exceptions. While we do have product liability insurance, our amounts of coverage may be inadequate to cover all potential liability claims. Insurance coverage, particularly as it relates to products relating to the hemp industry, is expensive, and additional coverage may be difficult to obtain. Also, additional insurance coverage may not be available in the future on acceptable terms and may not be sufficient to cover potential claims. We cannot be sure that our contract manufacturers or manufacturing partners who produce our beverage products, packaging and ingredients will have adequate insurance coverage themselves to cover against potential claims. If we experience a large insured loss, it may exceed any insurance coverage limits we have at that time, or our insurance carrier may decline to cover us or may raise our insurance rates to unacceptable levels, any of which could impair our financial position and potentially cause us to go out of business.

If we encounter product recalls or other product quality issues, our business may suffer.

Product quality issues, real or imagined, or allegations of product contamination, even when false or unfounded, could tarnish our image and could cause consumers to choose other products. In addition, because of changing government regulations or implementation thereof, or allegations of product contamination, we may be required from time to time to recall products entirely or from specific markets. Product recalls could affect our profitability and could negatively affect brand image.

It is difficult to predict the timing and amount of our sales because our distributors are not required to place minimum orders with us.

Our independent distributors and national accounts are not generally required to place minimum monthly orders for our products. In order to reduce their inventory costs, independent distributors typically order products from us on a “just in time” basis in quantities and at such times based on the demand for the products in a particular distribution area. Accordingly, we cannot predict the timing or quantity of purchases by any of our independent distributors or whether any of our distributors will continue to purchase products from us in the same frequencies and volumes as they may have done in the past. Additionally, our larger distributors and regional partners may make orders that are larger than we have historically been required to fill. Shortages in inventory levels, supply of raw materials or other key supplies could negatively affect us.

If we do not adequately manage our inventory levels, our operating results could be adversely affected.

We need to maintain adequate inventory levels to be able to deliver products to distributors on a timely basis. Our inventory supply depends on our ability to correctly estimate demand for our products. Our ability to estimate demand for our products is imprecise, particularly for new products, seasonal promotions and new markets. If we materially underestimate demand for our products or are unable to maintain sufficient inventory of raw materials, we might not be able to satisfy demand on a short-term basis. If we overestimate distributor or retailer demand for our products, we may end up with too much inventory, resulting in higher storage costs, increased trade spend and the risk of inventory spoilage. If we fail to manage our inventory to meet demand, we could damage our relationships with our distributors and retailers and could delay or lose sales opportunities, which would unfavorably impact our future sales and adversely affect our operating results. In addition, if the inventory of our products held by our distributors and retailers is too high, they will not place orders for additional products, which would also unfavorably impact our sales and adversely affect our operating results.

If we fail to maintain relationships with our independent contract manufacturers, our business could be harmed.

We do not manufacture our products but instead outsource the manufacturing process to third-party bottlers and independent contract manufacturers (co-packers). We do not own the manufacturing facilities, or the equipment required to manufacture and package our beverage products, and we do not anticipate bringing the manufacturing process in-house in the future. Our ability to maintain effective relationships with contract manufacturers and other third parties for the production and delivery of our beverage products in a particular geographic distribution area is important to the success of our operations within each distribution area. Competition for contract manufacturers’ business is intense, especially in the United States, and this could make it more difficult for us to obtain new or replacement manufacturers, or to locate back-up manufacturers, in our various distribution areas, and could also affect the economic terms of our agreements with our existing manufacturers. We may not be able to maintain our relationships with current contract manufacturers or establish satisfactory relationships with new or replacement contract manufacturers, whether in existing or new geographic distribution areas. The failure to establish and maintain effective relationships with contract manufacturers for a distribution area could increase our manufacturing costs and thereby materially reduce gross profits from the sale of our products in that area. Poor relations with any of our contract manufacturers could adversely affect the amount and timing of product delivered to our distributors for resale, which would in turn adversely affect our revenues and financial condition. In addition, our agreements with our contract manufacturers are terminable at any time, and any such termination could disrupt our ability to deliver products to our customers.

Our dependence on independent contract manufacturers could make management of our manufacturing and distribution efforts inefficient or unprofitable.

We are expected to arrange for our contract manufacturing needs sufficiently in advance of anticipated requirements, which is customary in the contract manufacturing industry for comparably sized companies. Based on the cost structure and forecasted demand for the particular geographic area where our contract manufacturers are located, we must evaluate which of contract manufacturers to use. To the extent demand for our products exceeds available inventory or the production capacity of our contract manufacturing arrangements, or orders are not submitted on a timely basis, we will be unable to fulfill distributor orders on demand. Conversely, we may produce more product inventory than warranted by the actual demand for it, resulting in higher storage costs and the potential risk of inventory spoilage. Our failure to accurately predict and manage our contract manufacturing requirements and our inventory levels may impair relationships with our independent distributors and key accounts, which, in turn, would likely have a material adverse effect on our ability to maintain effective relationships with those distributors and key accounts.

Increases in costs or shortages of raw materials could harm our business and financial results.

The principal raw materials we use or supply to our contract manufacturers include plastic bottles and lids, aluminum cans, labels and cardboard cartons, aluminum closures, hemp, and other beverage ingredients. In addition, certain of our contract manufacturing arrangements allow such contract manufacturers to increase their charges to us based on their own cost increases. These manufacturing and ingredient costs are subject to fluctuation. Substantial increases in the prices of ingredients, raw materials and packaging materials, used to produce our products, to the extent that they cannot be recouped through increases in the prices of finished beverage products, would increase our operating costs and could reduce our profitability. If the supply of these raw materials is impaired or if prices increase significantly, it could affect the affordability of our products and reduce sales.

If we or our contract manufacturers are unable to secure sufficient ingredients or raw materials including glass, sugar, and other key supplies, we might not be able to satisfy demand for our beverage products on a short-term basis. Moreover, in the past there have been industry-wide shortages of concentrates, supplements and sweeteners, and these shortages could occur again from time to time in the future, which could interfere with and delay production of our products and could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.

In addition, suppliers could fail to provide ingredients or raw materials on a timely basis, or fail to meet our performance expectations, for a number of reasons, including, for example, disruption to the global supply chain as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, which could cause a serious disruption to our business, increase our costs, decrease our operating efficiencies and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Increases in costs of energy and increased regulations may have an adverse impact on our gross margin.

Over the past few years, volatility in the global oil markets has resulted in high fuel prices, which many shipping companies have passed on to their customers by way of higher base pricing and increased fuel surcharges. If fuel prices increase, we expect to experience higher shipping rates and fuel surcharges, as well as energy surcharges on our raw materials. It is hard to predict what will happen in the fuel markets in 2021 and beyond. Due to the price sensitivity of our products, we may not be able to pass such increases on to our customers.

Disruption within our supply chain, contract manufacturing or distribution channels could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability, through our suppliers, business partners, contract manufacturers, independent distributors, and retailers, to make, move and sell products is critical to our success. Damage or disruption to our suppliers or to manufacturing or distribution capabilities due to weather, natural disaster, fire or explosion, terrorism, pandemics such as influenza and the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), labor strikes or other reasons, could impair the manufacture, distribution and sale of our products. Many of these events are outside of our control. Failure to take adequate steps to protect against or mitigate the likelihood or potential impact of such events, or to effectively manage such events if they occur, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel, our efficiency and operations would be adversely affected; in addition, staff turnover causes uncertainties and could harm our business.

Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees in such areas as finance, sales, marketing and product development and distribution. We compete to hire new employees, and, in some cases, must train them and develop their skills and competencies. We may not be able to provide our employees with competitive salaries, and our operating results could be adversely affected by increased costs due to increased competition for employees, higher employee turnover or increased employee benefit costs.

Recently, we have experienced significant changes in our sales personnel, and more could occur in the future. Changes to operations, policies and procedures, which can often occur with the appointment of new personnel, can create uncertainty, may negatively impact our ability to execute quickly and effectively, and may ultimately be unsuccessful. In addition, transition periods are often difficult as the new Company personnel gain detailed knowledge of our operations, and friction can result from changes in strategy and management style. Employee turnover inherently causes some loss of institutional knowledge, which can negatively affect strategy and execution. Until we integrate new personnel, and unless they are able to succeed in their positions, we may be unable to successfully manage and grow our business, and our financial condition and profitability may suffer.

Further, to the extent we experience additional personnel turnover, our operations, financial condition, and employee morale could be negatively impacted. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified management and sales personnel, our business could suffer. Moreover, our operations could be negatively affected if employees are quarantined as the result of exposure to a contagious illness such as COVID-19.

If we lose the services of our Chief Executive Officer, our operations could be disrupted, and our business could be harmed.

Our business plan relies significantly on the continued services of William Alessi, who we hired as our Chief Executive Officer in February 2018. If we were to lose the services of Mr. Alessi, our ability to execute our business plan could be materially impaired.

Management cannot guarantee that its relationship with the Company does not create conflicts of interest.

The relationship of management to the Company could create conflicts of interest. While management has a fiduciary duty to the Company, it also determines its compensation from the Company. Management’s compensation from the Company has not been determined pursuant to arm’s-length negotiation.

We are required to indemnify our directors and officers.

The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws provide that we will indemnify its officers and directors to the maximum extent permitted by Nevada law, provided that the officer or director acted in bad faith or breached his or her duty to us or our stockholders, that the officer or director acted in bad faith, or that it is more likely than not that it will ultimately be determined that the officer or director has not met the standards of conduct which make it permissible for under Nevada law for the Company to indemnify the officer or director. If we were called upon to indemnify an officer or director, then the portion of its assets expended for such purpose would reduce the amount otherwise available for the Company’s business.

If we fail to protect our trademarks and trade secrets, we may be unable to successfully market our products and compete effectively.

We rely on a combination of trademark and trade secrecy laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property rights. Failure to protect our intellectual property could harm our brand and our reputation, and adversely affect our ability to compete effectively. Further, enforcing or defending our intellectual property rights, including our trademarks and trade secrets, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources. We regard our intellectual property, particularly our trademarks and trade secrets, as crucial to our business and our success. However, the steps taken by us to protect these proprietary rights may not be adequate and may not prevent third parties from infringing or misappropriating our trademarks, trade secrets or similar proprietary rights. In addition, other parties may seek to assert infringement claims against us, and we may have to pursue litigation against other parties to assert our rights. Any such claim or litigation could be costly. In addition, any event that would jeopardize our proprietary rights or any claims of infringement by third parties could have a material adverse effect on our ability to market or sell our brands, profitably exploit our products, or recoup our associated research and development costs.

Our business is subject to many regulations and noncompliance is costly.

The production, marketing and sale of our beverages, including contents, labels, caps and containers, are subject to the rules and regulations of various federal, provincial, state and local health agencies. If a regulatory authority finds that a current or future product or production batch or “run” is not in compliance with any of these regulations, we may be fined, or production may be stopped, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Similarly, any adverse publicity associated with any noncompliance may damage our reputation and our ability to successfully market our products. Furthermore, the rules and regulations are subject to change from time to time and while we closely monitor developments in this area, we cannot anticipate whether changes in these rules and regulations will impact our business adversely. Additional or revised regulatory requirements, whether labeling, environmental, tax or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Significant additional labeling or warning requirements may inhibit sales of affected products.

Various jurisdictions may seek to adopt significant additional product labeling or warning requirements relating to the chemical content or perceived adverse health consequences of our beverage products. These types of requirements, if they become applicable to one or more of our products under current or future environmental or health laws or regulations, may inhibit sales of such products. In California, a law requires that a specific warning appear on any product that contains a component listed by the state as having been found to cause cancer or birth defects. This law recognizes no generally applicable quantitative thresholds below which a warning is not required. If a component found in one of our products is added to the list, or if the increasing sensitivity of detection methodology that may become available under this law and related regulations as they currently exist, or as they may be amended, results in the detection of an infinitesimal quantity of a listed substance in one of our beverages produced for sale in California, the resulting warning requirements or adverse publicity could affect our sales.

Litigation or legal proceedings could expose us to significant liabilities and damage our reputation.

We may become party to litigation claims and legal proceedings. Litigation involves significant risks, uncertainties, and costs, including distraction of management attention away from our business operations. We evaluate litigation claims and legal proceedings to assess the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and to estimate, if possible, the amount of potential losses. Based on these assessments and estimates, we establish reserves and disclose the relevant litigation claims or legal proceedings, as appropriate. These assessments and estimates are based on the information available to management at the time and involve a significant amount of management judgment. Actual outcomes or losses may differ materially from those envisioned by our current assessments and estimates. Our policies and procedures require strict compliance by our employees and agents with all U.S. and local laws and regulations applicable to our business operations, including those prohibiting improper payments to government officials. Nonetheless, our policies and procedures may not ensure full compliance by our employees and agents with all applicable legal requirements. Improper conduct by our employees or agents could damage our reputation or lead to litigation or legal proceedings that could result in civil or criminal penalties, including substantial monetary fines, as well as disgorgement of profits.

Climate change may negatively affect our business.

There is growing concern that a gradual increase in global average temperatures may cause an adverse change in weather patterns around the globe resulting in an increase in the frequency and severity of natural disasters. While warmer weather has historically been associated with increased sales of our products, changing weather patterns could have a negative impact on agricultural productivity, which may limit availability or increase the cost of certain key ingredients such as sugar cane, natural flavors and supplements used in our products. Also, increased frequency or duration of extreme weather conditions may disrupt the productivity of our facilities, the operation of our supply chain or impact demand for our products. In addition, the increasing concern over climate change may result in more regional, federal, and global legal and regulatory requirements and could result in increased production, transportation, and raw material costs. As a result, the effects of climate change could have a long-term adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

Our business and operations would be adversely impacted in the event of a failure or interruption of our information technology infrastructure or as a result of a cybersecurity attack.

The proper functioning of our own information technology (IT) infrastructure is critical to the efficient operation and management of our business. We may not have the necessary financial resources to update and maintain our IT infrastructure, and any failure or interruption of our IT system could adversely impact our operations. In addition, our IT is vulnerable to cyberattacks, computer viruses, worms and other malicious software programs, physical and electronic break-ins, sabotage, and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems. We believe that we have adopted appropriate measures to mitigate potential risks to our technology infrastructure and our operations from these IT-related and other potential disruptions. However, given the unpredictability of the timing, nature and scope of any such IT failures or disruptions, we could potentially be subject to downtimes, transactional errors, processing inefficiencies, operational delays, other detrimental impacts on our operations or ability to provide products to our customers, the compromising of confidential or personal information, destruction or corruption of data, security breaches, other manipulation or improper use of our systems and networks, financial losses from remedial actions, loss of business or potential liability, and/or damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, competitive position, financial condition or results of operations.

Our results of operations may fluctuate from quarter to quarter for many reasons, including seasonality.

Our sales are seasonal, and we experience fluctuations in quarterly results as a result of many factors. We historically have generated a greater percentage of our revenues during the warm weather months of April through September. Timing of customer purchases will vary each year, and sales can be expected to shift from one quarter to another. As a result, management believes that period-to-period comparisons of results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as any indication of future performance or results expected for the fiscal year.

In addition, our operating results may fluctuate due to a number of other factors including, but not limited to:

Due to these and other factors, our results of operations have fluctuated from period to period and may continue to do so in the future, which could cause our operating results in a particular quarter to fail to meet market expectations.

Changes in our effective tax rate may impact our results of operations.

We are subject to taxes in the U.S. and other jurisdictions. Tax rates in these jurisdictions may be subject to significant change due to economic and/or political conditions. A number of other factors may also impact our future effective tax rate including:

In December 2017, enacted legislation in the United States significantly revised the Internal Revenue Code. The enacted federal income tax law, among other things, contained significant changes to corporate taxation, including reduction of the corporate tax rate from a top marginal rate of 35% to a flat rate of 21% beginning in 2018, limitation of the tax deduction for interest expense to 30% of adjusted earnings, limitation of the deduction for net operating losses to 80% of current year taxable income and elimination of net operating loss carrybacks, one time taxation of offshore earnings at reduced rates regardless of whether they are repatriated, immediate deductions for certain new investments instead of deductions for depreciation expense over time, and modifying or repealing many business deductions and credits (including reducing the business tax credit for certain clinical testing expenses incurred in the testing of certain drugs for rare diseases or conditions).

Notwithstanding the reduction in the corporate income tax rate, the overall impact of the new federal tax law remains uncertain and our business and financial condition could be adversely affected. In addition, it is uncertain if and to what extent various states will conform to the newly enacted federal tax law. The impact of this tax reform on holders of our common stock is also uncertain and could be adverse. We urge shareholders to consult with their legal and tax advisors with respect to this legislation and the potential tax consequences of investing in or holding our common stock.

Global economic, political, social and other conditions, including the COVID-19 pandemic, may continue to adversely impact our business and results of operations.

The beverage industry, and particularly those companies selling premium beverages like us, can be affected by macro-economic factors, including changes in national, regional, and local economic conditions, unemployment levels and consumer spending patterns, which together may impact the willingness of consumers to purchase our products as they adjust their discretionary spending. Adverse economic conditions may adversely affect the ability of our distributors to obtain the credit necessary to fund their working capital needs, which could negatively impact their ability or desire to continue to purchase products from us in the same frequencies and volumes as they have done in the past. If we experience similar adverse economic conditions in the future, sales of our products could be adversely affected, collectability of accounts receivable may be compromised and we may face obsolescence issues with our inventory, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and financial condition.

Additionally, while the extent of the impact on our business and financial condition is unknown at this time, we may be negatively affected by COVID-19 and actions taken to address and limit the spread of COVID-19, such as travel restrictions, event cancellations, and limitations affecting the supply of labor and the movement of raw materials and finished products. If available manufacturing capacity is reduced as a result of the COVID-19, it could negatively affect the timely supply, pricing and availability of finished products. Moreover, we will also be negatively impacted by current and future closures of restaurants, independent accounts, convenience chains, and retail store chains resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak. The current closures of restaurants and independent accounts will negatively affect our revenues and cash flows, especially with respect to our fountain business, which comprised approximately 9% of the Company’s revenues in 2019. Although the current status of retail and convenience chains remains unknown at this time, the future closure of these types of establishments will also adversely impact our business and financial condition.

Overall, the Company does not yet know the full extent of potential delays or impacts on its business, financing activities, or the global economy as a whole. However, these effects could have a material impact on the Company’s liquidity, capital resources, operations and business and those of third parties on which we rely.

Changes in accounting standards and subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by management related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial results.

The United States generally accepted accounting principles and related pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regard to a wide variety of matters that are relevant to our business, such as, but not limited to, stock-based compensation, trade spend and promotions, and income taxes are highly complex and involve many subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by our management. Changes to these rules or their interpretation or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates or judgments by our management could significantly change our reported results.

If we are unable to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, our stock price and investor confidence could be materially and adversely affected.

We are required to maintain both disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting that are effective. Because of their inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting, however well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the controls will prevent or detect misstatements. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there is only the reasonable assurance that our controls will succeed in achieving their goals under all potential future conditions. The failure of controls by design deficiencies or absence of adequate controls could result in a material adverse effect on our business and financial results, which could also negatively impact our stock price and investor confidence.

Risk Factors Related to Our Common Stock

The price of our common stock may be volatile, and a shareholder’s investment in our common stock could suffer a decline in value.

There has been significant volatility in the volume and market price of our common stock, and this volatility may continue in the future. In addition, factors such as quarterly variations in our operating results, litigation involving us, general trends relating to the beverage industry, actions by governmental agencies, national economic and stock market considerations as well as other events and circumstances beyond our control, including the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak, could have a significant impact on the future market price of our common stock and the relative volatility of such market price.

A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could result in a reduction in the liquidity of our common stock and a reduction in our ability to raise capital. If we are unable to raise the funds required for all of our planned operations and key initiatives, we may be forced to allocate funds from other planned uses, which may negatively impact our business and operations, including our ability to develop new products and continue our current operations.

Any future equity or debt issuances by us may have dilutive or adverse effects on our existing shareholders.

From time to time, we may issue additional shares of common stock or convertible securities. The issuance of these securities could dilute our shareholders’ ownership in our company and may include terms that give new investors rights that are superior to those of our current shareholders. Moreover, any issuances by us of equity securities may be at or below the prevailing market price of our common stock and in any event may have a dilutive impact on our shareholders’ ownership interest, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Our common stock is traded on the OTC Link ATS, which may have an unfavorable impact on our stock price and liquidity.

Our stock is traded on the OTC Link Alternative Trading System (ATS) operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. The OTC Link ATS is a significantly more limited market than the national securities exchanges such as the New York Stock Exchange, or Nasdaq stock exchange, and there are lower financial or qualitative standards that a company must meet to have its stock quoted on the OTC Link ATS. The OTC Link ATS is an inter-dealer quotation system much less regulated than the major exchanges, and trading in our common stock may be subject to abuses, volatility and shorting, which may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market price of our common stock for reasons unrelated to operating performance. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has adopted rules that require a broker-dealer to have reasonable grounds for believing an investment is suitable for that customer when recommending an investment to a customer. FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for some customers and may make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may result in a limited ability to buy and sell our stock. We currently do not meet applicable listing standards of a market senior to the OTC Link ATS, and we may never apply or qualify for future listing on Nasdaq or a senior market or national securities exchange.

Our common shares are subject to the “Penny Stock” rules of the SEC, and the trading market in our securities will likely be limited, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our stock.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:

Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

We do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our shares of common stock in the near future, so our shareholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell their shares.

We intend to retain any future earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. There is no assurance that future dividends will be paid, and if dividends are paid, there is no assurance with respect to the amount of any such dividend. Unless we pay dividends, our shareholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell such shares.

A small group of Company officers and directors hold a majority of the control of the Company.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s executive officers and directors owned approximately 64.8% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. By virtue of such stock ownership, the principal shareholders are able to control the election of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors and to generally exercise control over the affairs of the Company. Such concentration of ownership could also have the effect of delaying, deterring, or preventing a change in control of the Company that might otherwise be beneficial to stockholders. There can be no assurance that conflicts of interest will not arise with respect to such directors or that such conflicts will be resolved in a manner favorable to the Company.

Even if a market develops for our shares, our shares may be thinly traded with wide share price fluctuations, low share prices and minimal liquidity.

If an established market for our shares develops, our share price may be volatile with wide fluctuations in response to several factors, including: potential investors’ anticipated feeling regarding our results of operations; increased competition; and our ability or inability to generate future revenues. In addition, our share price may be affected by factors that are unrelated or disproportionate to our operating performance. Our share price might be affected by general economic, political, and market conditions, such as recessions, interest rates, commodity prices, or international currency fluctuations. Additionally, stocks traded on the OTC Link ATS are usually thinly traded, highly volatile and not followed by analysts. These factors, which are not under our control, may have a material effect on our share price.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties.

None. The Company’s office space is provided free of charge by its officer and director, William Alessi.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business. As of December 31, 2021, there were no pending or threatened lawsuits that could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

The Company’s common stock is not traded on any national securities exchange but is quoted on the alternative trading system operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. (the OTC Link ATS) under the “GHMP” trading symbol at the OTC Pink level. The following table summarizes the high and low historical trading prices of the Company’s common stock for the periods indicated as reported by OTCMarkets.com (as historic high and low bid prices are not reported by OTCMarkets.com).

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2020

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2021

Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends as may be declared by the Board of Directors. The Company’s Board of Directors is not restricted from paying any dividends but is not obligated to declare a dividend. No cash dividends have ever been declared and it is not anticipated that cash dividends will ever be paid.

We are currently authorized to issue 30,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001, of which 250,000 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding as of October 16, 2020. On July 21, 2020, we filed with the State of Nevada a Certificate of Designation designating 250,000 shares of the Company’s authorized preferred stock as Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B-1 Preferred Stock”). Each share of Series B-1 Preferred Stock is convertible into 1.667 shares of Company common stock (subject to a 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation). The Series B-1 Preferred Stock entitles the holder to piggy-back registration rights and one vote per share and has no liquidation or dividend preferences. Also, on July 21, 2020, we filed with the State of Nevada a Certificate of Designation designating 750,000 shares of the Company’s authorized preferred stock as Series B-2 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B-2 Preferred Stock”). Each share of Series B-2 Preferred Stock is convertible into a number of shares of Company common stock equal to $1.00 divided by (i) the lesser of $0.60 or 60% of the 14-day average closing price of the Company’s common stock at the time of conversion (the “Market Price”) if the conversion occurs within 6 months of July 21, 2020, or (ii) 60% of the Market Price if the conversion occurs at least six months after July 21, 2020 (subject to a 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation). The Series B-2 Preferred Stock entitles the holder to one vote per share and has no liquidation or dividend preferences or other rights. No shares of Series B-2 Preferred Stock are outstanding although we have granted Todd Braun, one of the Selling Security Holders, warrants to purchase all 750,000 designated but unissued shares of Series B-2 Preferred Stock. We have not designated any other series of preferred stock, but our Board of Directors has the authority to designate the rights and preferences of each series of preferred stock without action by our stockholders, and then to issue shares of preferred stock. As a result, preferred shares could be issued quickly and easily, negatively affecting the rights of holders of common shares and could be issued with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control or make removal of management more difficult. Because we may issue preferred stock in order to raise capital for our operations, your ownership interest may be diluted which would result in your percentage of ownership in us decreasing.

As of December 31, 2021, the Company had 23,805,630 outstanding shares of common stock which were owned by approximately 37 shareholders of record.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Not applicable.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.

The statements contained in the following MD&A and elsewhere throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including any documents incorporated by reference, that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “may,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “estimate,” “target,” “project,” “intend” and similar words or expressions. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections, or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s beliefs, objectives, and expectations as of the date hereof, are based on the best judgement of our management. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in such statements, including, without limitation, the following: economic, social and political conditions, global economic downturns resulting from extraordinary events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and other securities industry risks; interest rate risks; liquidity risks; credit risk with clients and counterparties; risk of liability for errors in clearing functions; systemic risk; systems failures, delays and capacity constraints; network security risks; competition; reliance on external service providers; new laws and regulations affecting our business; net capital requirements; extensive regulation, regulatory uncertainties and legal matters; failure to maintain relationships with employees, customers, business partners or governmental entities; the inability to achieve synergies or to implement integration plans and other consequences associated with risks and uncertainties detailed in our filings with the SEC, including our most recent filings on Forms 10-K and 10-Q.

We caution that the foregoing list of factors is not exclusive, and new factors may emerge, or changes to the foregoing factors may occur, that could impact our business. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise these statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent required by the federal securities laws.

Certain information contained in this discussion and elsewhere in this report may include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is subject to the safe harbor created by that act. The safe harbor created by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act will not apply to certain “forward looking statements” because we issued “penny stock” (as defined in Section 3(a)(51) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 3(a)(51-1) under the Exchange Act) during the three year period preceding the date(s) on which those forward looking statements were first made, except to the extent otherwise specifically provided by rule, regulation or order of the Securities and Exchange Commission. We caution readers that certain important factors may affect our actual results and could cause such results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements which may be deemed to have been made in this Report or which are otherwise made by or on our behalf. For this purpose, any statements contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “explore,” “consider,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” “estimate,” “plan,” or “propose” or the negative variations of those words or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Factors that may affect our results include, but are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties associated with:

We are also subject to other risks detailed from time to time in our other filings with Securities and Exchange Commission and elsewhere in this report. Any one or more of these uncertainties, risks and other influences could materially affect our results of operations and whether forward-looking statements made by us ultimately prove to be accurate. Our actual results, performance and achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether from new information, future events or otherwise.

We qualify as an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act. As a result, we are permitted to, and intend to, rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements. For so long as we are an emerging growth company, we will not be required to:

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. Our financial statements may therefore not be comparable to those of companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.

We will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our total annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which would occur if the market value of our ordinary shares that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three year period.

Plan of Operation

The Company was formed as a Nevada corporation on November 26, 2007. The Company was involved in exploration and development of mining properties until September 30, 2013, when it discontinued operations. In June 2017, the Company’s creditors filed a petition in the District Court of Harris County, Texas for the appointment of a receiver. In August of 2017, the court appointed a receiver (who was subsequently appointed as an officer and director of the Company), and in February 2018, the receiver appointed William Alessi as a director of the Company and then resigned as a director and officer of the Company.

On February 6, 2019, the Company acquired trademarks and intellectual property, which includes all rights and trade secrets to the hemp-derived CBD-infused line of consumer beverages sold under the “Good Hemp” brand. Since then, the Company has been conducting operations under the “Good Hemp” trade name and through the http://www.goodhemplivin.com/ website. Information on this website is not a part of this report on Form 10-Q.

On April 30, 2019, the Company acquired from Mr. Spoone the “CANNA HEMP” and “CANNA” trademarks including all rights and trade secrets and related inventory. At June 30, 2021, the Company had not attributed any value to these acquired trademarks.

On August 24, 2020, with an effective date of July 1, 2020, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with Paul Hervey (“Hervey”), an individual, for the purpose of cultivating hemp on approximately 9 acres of farmland and in approximately 3,700 square feet of greenhouse space in North Carolina (referred to as “Olin Farms”). In October 2021, Olin Farms ceased operations, and the limited liability company joint venture entity was dissolved in North Carolina.

On February 9, 2021, the Company formed Good Hemp Wellness, LLC, a limited liability company formed under the laws of the State of North Carolina, to sell CBD products to customers through chiropractic offices. In October 2021, this company was dissolved in North Carolina, and it is being treated as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements. The Company plans to sell Good Hemp Wellness CBD inventory directly.

On April 1, 2021, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase Diamond Creek Group, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company which sells the Diamond Creek brand of high alkaline water products, for a total purchase price of $643,000. On April 2, 2021, the Company closed the acquisition and paid the initial $500,000 portion of the purchase price, and on April 23, 2021, paid the $143,000 purchase price balance.

The Company is a North Carolina based company that is made up of industry veterans focused on exploiting niche markets in the hemp and beverage industries. The Company’s products include high alkaline water products, hemp-based beverage products under Good Hemp® brand, and CBD softgels under the Good Hemp Wellness brand. Good Hemp® products include two lines of hemp-based beverages described below. Good Hemp® products have been sold throughout the United States since 2016 via Amazon.com, as well as local retailers.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

Results of Operations

For the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020

Revenues

We had $1,222,067 and $415,796 of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Revenue increased in 2021 as compared to 2020 as a result of increasing sales volumes resulting from increased online advertising efforts and engaging several additional beverage distributors in 2020.

Cost of Sales

We had $1,122,181 and $342,824 of cost of sales for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, as a percentage of revenue, it was 91.8% and 82.5%, respectively.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $2,357,823 and $1,388,074, respectively. The increase in expenses for 2021 compared to 2020 were comprised primarily of amortization of the branding agreement of $1,753,714.

Other Income (Expenses)

Other expenses for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $2,484,407 and $146,853, respectively. The gain (loss) on derivatives for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was ($1,694,431) and $39,811, respectively.

Net Loss

Net loss for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $4,816,176 and $1,461,955, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We had a cash balance of $15,121 and negative working capital of $5,053,486 at December 31, 2021 and a cash balance of $21,233 and negative working capital of $2,2,16,462 at December 31, 2020.

The Company’s anticipated capital requirements for the next 12 months will consist of expenses of being a public company and general and administrative expenses all of which we currently estimate will cost $1,500,000, excluding revenue related expenses and salaries. In the event there are unanticipated expenses and we need additional funds, we may seek to raise additional funding that we require in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock. However, we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock to fund such additional expenses. We currently do not have any agreements, arrangements or understandings with any person or entity to obtain funds through bank loans, lines of credit or any other sources.

Sources and Uses of Cash

Operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2021 used $727,660 of net cash. Net cash used in investing activities was $690,600 for the year ended December 31, 2021. Net cash provided by financing activities of $1,373,513 was received from the issuance of preferred and common stock and convertible notes payable during the year ended December 31, 2021.Operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2020 used $121,522 of net cash. Net cash used in investing activities was $63,433 for the year ended December 31, 2020. Net cash provided by financing activities of $158,100 was received from the issuance of common stock and shareholder advances during the year ended December 31, 2020.

The Company has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and some of its earlier plans to further diversify its operations and expand its operating subsidiaries have been paused due to the economic uncertainty.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues, or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Critical Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates in the accompanying financial statements include the amortization period for intangible assets, valuation and impairment valuation of intangible assets, depreciable lives of the web site and property and equipment, valuation of warrant and beneficial conversion feature debt discounts, valuation of share-based payments and the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.

Changes in Accounting Principles. No significant changes in accounting principles were adopted during fiscal 2021 and 2020.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ASC 360-10, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” This statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements. The Company measures their financial assets and liabilities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. For certain of our financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses escrow liability and short-term loans the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities.

We have adopted accounting guidance for financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. The adoption did not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. This standard does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. This guidance does not apply to measurements related to share-based payments. This guidance discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The guidance utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore developed using estimates and assumptions developed by us, which reflect those that a market participant would use.

Revenue Recognition. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. ASU 2014-09 was effective for the Company in its first quarter of 2019.

Subsequently, the FASB has issued the following standards related to ASU 2014-09: ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (“ASU 2016-08”); ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing (“ASU 2016-10”); and ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients (“ASU 2016-12”). The Company must adopt ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-12 with ASU 2014-09 (collectively, the “new revenue standards”).

The new revenue standards may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. The Company adopted the new revenue standards in its first quarter of 2018 utilizing the full retrospective transition method.

Stock-Based Compensation. The Company accounts for stock-based instruments issued to employees in accordance with ASC Topic 718. ASC Topic 718 requires companies to recognize in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees. The Company accounts for non-employee share-based awards in accordance with ASC Topic 505-50. The value of the portion of an award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense over the requisite service periods using the straight-line attribution method. The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

Inflation

In the opinion of management, inflation has not had a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of its operations.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 8. Financial Statements

GOOD HEMP, INC.

Contents

Boyle CPA, LLC

Certified Public Accountants & Consultants

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and

Board of Directors of Good Hemp, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Good Hemp, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.  In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Substantial Doubt About the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company’s continuing operating losses, working capital deficiency and accumulated deficit raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year from the issuance of the financial statements. Management’s plans are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis of Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits.  We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks.  Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Boyle CPA, LLC

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.

Red Bank, NJ

April 22, 2022

GOOD HEMP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GOOD HEMP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GOOD HEMP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

For the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GOOD HEMP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GOOD HEMP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Good Hemp, Inc. (the “Company” or “Good Hemp”), formerly known as Keyser Resources, Inc., and Lone Star Gold, Inc., was incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 26, 2007.

The Company was involved in the exploration and development of mining properties until September 30, 2013, when it discontinued operations. In 2017, the Company was put into receivership and in 2018, it emerged from receivership. On September 11, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors, pursuant to Nevada Revised Statute 92A.280, amended the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company from Lone Star Gold, Inc. to Good Hemp, Inc. The amendment was filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on September 12, 2019.

The Company is now a North Carolina based company that is made up of industry veterans focused on exploiting niche markets in the hemp industry. Good Hemp® includes two lines of hemp-based beverages. Good Hemp® 2oh! is a hemp-derived, CBD-infused line of flavored waters, and Good Hemp® fizz! is a line of carbonated hemp oil infused sodas. Good Hemp® products have been sold throughout the United States since 2016 via Amazon.com, as well as local retailers.

By establishing a comprehensive distribution system, Good Hemp® has secured listings for its products with regional and national grocery and convenience chain stores.

On July 21, 2020, the Company filed with the State of Nevada a Certificate of Designation designating 250,000 shares of the Company’s authorized preferred stock as Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B-1 Preferred Stock”). Each share of Series B-1 Preferred Stock is convertible into 1.667 shares of Company common stock (subject to a 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation). The Series B-1 Preferred Stock entitles the holder to piggy-back registration rights and one vote per share.

Also, on July 21, 2020, the Company filed with the State of Nevada a Certificate of Designation designating 750,000 shares of the Company’s authorized preferred stock as Series B-2 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B-2 Preferred Stock”). Each share of Series B-2 Preferred Stock is convertible into a number of shares of Company common stock equal to $1.00 divided by (i) the lesser of $0.60 or 60% of the 14-day average closing price of the Company’s common stock at the time of conversion (the “Market Price”) if the conversion occurs within 6 months of July 21, 2020, or (ii) 60% of the Market Price if the conversion occurs at least 6 months after July 21, 2020 (subject to a 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation). The Series B-2 Preferred Stock entitles the holder to one vote per share.

On February 9, 2021, the Company formed Good Hemp Wellness, LLC, a limited liability company formed under the laws of the State of North Carolina to sell CBD products to customers through chiropractic offices. Effective February 10, 2021, the Company entered into an Operating Agreement with Simple Growth Solutions, LLC governing the operation of the Joint Venture Subsidiary and providing that (i) Good Hemp Wellness will be owned initially 66.66% by the Company and 33.34% by Simple Growth; (ii) the Joint Venture Subsidiary will be managed by a Board of Managers consisting of three managers, two of which shall be appointed by the Company, and one of which shall be appointed by Simple Growth. In October 2021, Good Hemp Wellness, LLC was dissolved. This company is being treated as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements.

On April 1, 2021, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase Diamond Creek Group, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company which sells the Diamond Creek brand of high alkaline water products, for a total purchase price of $643,000. On April 2, 2021, the Company closed the acquisition and paid the initial $500,000 portion of the purchase price, and on April 23, 2021, paid the $143,000 purchase price balance. See note 4 for the purchase price allocation.

The outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19) resulted in increased travel restrictions, and shutdown of businesses, which may cause slower recovery of the economy. We may experience impact from quarantines, market downturns and changes in customer behavior related to pandemic fears and impact on our workforce if the virus continues to spread. In addition, one or more of our customers, partners, service providers or suppliers may experience financial distress, delayed or defaults on payment, file for bankruptcy protection, sharp diminishing of business, or suffer disruptions in their business due to the outbreak. The extent to which the coronavirus impacts our results will depend on future developments and reactions throughout the world, which are highly uncertain and will include emerging information concerning the severity of the coronavirus and the actions taken by governments and private businesses to attempt to contain the coronavirus. It is likely to result in a potential material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Wider-spread COVID-19 globally could prolong the deterioration in economic conditions and could cause decreases in or delays in advertising spending and reduce and/or negatively impact our short-term ability to grow our revenues. Any decreased collectability of accounts receivable, bankruptcy of small and medium businesses, or early termination of agreements due to deterioration in economic conditions could negatively impact our results of operations.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The Company follows the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and has a year-end of December 31^st.

Management further acknowledges that it is solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices, establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control and preventing and detecting fraud. The Company’s system of internal accounting control is designed to assure, among other items, that 1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are recorded; and 3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely manner to produce financial statements which present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective periods being presented.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the recoverability of long-lived assets and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

Consolidation

The financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its’ wholly-owned subsidiaries Diamond Creek Group, LLC and Good Hemp Wellness, LLC.  Good Hemp Wellness, LLC was discontinued during 2021.  All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to make the December 31, 2020 balances comparable to December 31, 2021.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets that management expects to hold and use is based on the fair value of the asset. Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The FASB issued ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for financial assets and liabilities. ASC 820-10 provides a framework for measuring fair value and requires expanded disclosures regarding fair value measurements. ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available. The following summarizes the three levels of inputs required by the standard that the Company uses to measure fair value:

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. We evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash equivalents include demand deposits, money market funds, and all highly liquid debt instructions with original maturities of three months or less.

The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions of high credit worthiness. At times, its cash and cash equivalents with a particular financial institution may exceed any applicable government insurance limits. The Company’s management plans to assess the financial strength and credit worthiness of any parties to which it extends funds, and as such, it believes that any associated credit risk exposures are limited.

Inventory

Inventory consisting of raw materials and finished product is stated at the lower of cost (first in, first out method) or net realizable value.

Concentration and Credit Risk

At December 31, 2021, all the Company’s receivables were with 3 customers, comprising 47%, 31% and 22% of the balance. Sales to these three customers comprised 63% of the Company's sales during the year ended December 31, 2021.

Cash - The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions of high credit worthiness. At times, its cash and cash equivalents with a particular financial institution may exceed any applicable government insurance limits. The Company’s management plans to assess the financial strength and credit worthiness of any parties to which it extends funds, and as such, it believes that any associated credit risk exposures are limited.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Trade accounts receivable consists of product sales to customers. Trade accounts receivable are generally due 30 days after issuance of the invoice. Receivables past due more than 120 days are considered delinquent. Delinquent receivables are written off based on specific circumstances of the customer. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, an allowance was not deemed necessary.

Derivative Financial Instruments

For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company used a Black Scholes valuation model to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement or conversion of the instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

Commitment and Contingencies

The Company follows ASC 450-20, Loss Contingencies, to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

The Company follows ASC 440-10, Commitments, to report accounting for certain commitments.

Net Loss Per Common Share

The Company computes net income or loss per share in accordance with ASC 260 Earnings per Share. Under the provisions of the Earnings per Share Topic ASC, basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss available to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The calculation of diluted net loss per share gives effect to common stock equivalents; however, potential common shares are excluded if their effect is anti-dilutive.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for its income taxes in accordance with ASC 740 Income Taxes, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred tax assets that would otherwise be recorded for income tax benefits primarily relating to operating loss carryforwards as realization cannot be determined to be more likely than not.

The statement establishes a more-likely-than-not threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements. Also, the statement implements a process for measuring those tax positions which meet the recognition threshold of being ultimately sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. There are no uncertain tax positions taken by the Company on its tax returns and the adoption of the statement had no material impact to the Company’s financial statements. The Company files tax returns in the US and states in which it has operations and is subject to taxation. Tax years subsequent to 2017 remain open to examination by U.S. federal and state tax jurisdictions.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 606. The Company performs the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The Company applies the five-step model to arrangements that meet the definition of a contract under Topic 606, including when it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of Topic 606, the Company evaluates the goods or services promised within each contract related performance obligation and assesses whether each promised good or service is distinct. The Company recognizes as revenue, the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied.

The Company recognizes revenue upon completion of our performance obligations or expiration of the contractual time to use services such as professional service hours purchased in bulk for a given time period.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by FASB that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. If not discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.

NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared using generally accepted in the United States of American applicable to a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has recurring losses, an accumulated deficit and a working capital deficiency. As reflected in the financial statements, the Company had a working capital deficit of $5,053,486 at December 31, 2021 and had a loss of $4,816,176 for the year ended December 31, 2021. Management’s plans include raising capital in the debt and equity markets. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until its operations become established enough to be considered reliably profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year from the issuance of these financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 4 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS

On February 6, 2019, the Company, entered into an Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with S. Mark Spoone, a Colorado corporation (the “Seller”), to acquire all of Mr. Spoone’s intellectual property associated with Mr. Spoone’s “Good Hemp” hemp-derived CBD-infused line of consumer beverages, for a purchase price consisting of 12,000,000 shares of the Company’s Class A preferred shares for a total value of $12,000. The transaction was completed on February 12, 2019.

On April 30, 2019, the Company acquired from S. Mark Spoone the CANNA HEMP and CANNA trademarks including all rights and trade secrets and related inventory for consideration totaling $32,462.39. At December 31, 2021, the Company had not attributed any value to the acquired trademarks.

Effective February 28, 2020, the Company entered into a Branding Agreement (the “Branding Agreement”) with Spire Holdings, LLC (“Spire”), pursuant to which the Company would immediately issue Spire 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Spire Shares”), and Spire would provide the Company (i) 7 primary NASCAR Cup Series No. 77 entry automobile, team and drivers (“Car”) sponsorships, and (ii) 25 associate or secondary sponsorships in connection with the Car, subject to NASCAR and network television approval. Pursuant to the Branding Agreement, Spire has some antidilution protection and piggyback registration rights with respect to the Spire Shares.

On February 10, 2021, the Company and Spire entered into an Amendment to Branding Agreement amending the sponsorship dates to be during the 2021-2022 NASCAR Cup Series racing seasons instead of the 2020-2021 racing season.

The Company recorded an intangible asset in the amount of $2,700,000 based on the closing price of GHMP common shares of $0.45 on February 28,2020. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company determined that it had utilized approximately 36% of the services provided under the branding agreement and has recognized $964,286 as expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company determined that it had utilized 100% of the services provided under the branding agreement and has recognized $1,735,714 as expenses. The following summarizes the branding agreement:

On April 1, 2021, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase Diamond Creek Group, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company which sells the Diamond Creek brand of high alkaline water products, for a total purchase price of $643,000. On April 2, 2021, the Company closed the acquisition and paid the initial $500,000 portion of the purchase price, and on April 23, 2021, paid the $143,000 purchase price balance. During 2021, a major customer chose not to continue purchasing products from Diamond Creek. The Company evaluated goodwill and determined that it was impaired by $161,309. The determination was based upon the loss of a major customer of Diamond Creek, with the resulting decline in revenues. The purchase price was allocated as follows:

 Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information

The following table provides unaudited supplemental pro forma results for the Company for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 as if the Diamond Creek Group, LLC acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2020:

The unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information was prepared based on the historical information of the Company and Diamond Creek Group LLC. The unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information does not give effect to the potential impact of current financial conditions, any anticipated synergies, operating efficiencies or cost savings that may result from the acquisitions or any integration costs. Unaudited pro forma balances are not necessarily indicative of operating results had the Diamond Creek Group LLC acquisition occurred on January 1, 2020 or of future results.

NOTE 5 – NOTES PAYABLE

On March 30, 2020, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with Power Up Lending Group Ltd., a Virginia corporation (the “Investor”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the Investor a 10% Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”), dated March 23, 2020, in the principal amount of $67,500. The Note was funded by the Investor on March 30, 2020, and on such date pursuant to the SPA, the Company reimbursed the Investor for expenses for legal fees and due diligence of $2,500. The SPA includes customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and customary closing conditions.

The Note matures 12 months after the date of the Note on March 23, 2021. The Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock beginning on the date which is 180 days from the date of the Note, at a conversion price equal to 65% multiplied by the lowest closing bid price during the 20 trading day period ending on the last complete trading day prior to the date of conversion; provided, however, that the Investor may not convert the Note to the extent that such conversion would result in the Investor’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock being in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The beneficial ownership limitation may not be waived by the Investor.

The Note carries a prepayment penalty if the Note is paid off in 60, 90, 120,150, or 180 days following the Note date. The prepayment penalty is based on the then-outstanding principal at the time of payoff, plus accrued and unpaid interest, multiplied by 115%, 120%, 125%, 130%, and 135% respectively. After the expiration of 180 days following the issue date, the Company shall have no right of prepayment. As of December 31, 2021, this note has been paid in full.

Effective April 8, 2020, the Company and its lender, GS Capital Partners, LLC, entered into a forbearance agreement relating to the Lender’s promissory note dated October 8, 2019, in the original principal amount of $103,000, pursuant to which the Company would pay the Lender $40,000 by April 10, 2020, and $80,000 by May 10, 2020. The Company made both payments, with the final payment made on May 11, 2020, since May 10, 2020, was a Sunday, and the lender’s note is now considered paid in full.

Effective May 8, 2020, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with Power Up Lending Group Ltd., a Virginia corporation (“Power Up”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the Power Up an 8% Convertible Promissory Note, dated May 7, 2020, in the principal amount of $42,000. The note was funded by the Power Up on May 8, 2020, and on such date pursuant to the securities purchase agreement, the Company reimbursed the Power Up for expenses for legal fees and due diligence of $2,000. The securities purchase agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and customary closing conditions. The note matures 12 months after the date of the note on May 7, 2021. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock beginning on the date which is 180 days from the date of the note, at a conversion price equal to 65% multiplied by the lowest closing bid price during the 20 trading day period ending on the last complete trading day prior to the date of conversion; provided, however, that Power Up may not convert the note to the extent that such conversion would result in Power Up’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock being in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The beneficial ownership limitation may not be waived by Power Up. The note carries a prepayment penalty if the note is paid off in 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, or 180 days following the note date. The prepayment penalty is based on the then-outstanding principal at the time of payoff, plus accrued and unpaid interest, multiplied by 112%, 115%, 118%, 125%, 130%, and 135% respectively. After the expiration of 180 days following the issue date, the Company shall have no right of prepayment. As of December 31, 2021, this note has been paid in full.

On July 31, 2020, the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note (the “JRF Note”) to JRF AZ Investments II, LP (the “JRF Investor”), in the principal amount of $60,000, which was funded on July 31, 2020. The JRF Note matured nine months after the date of the note and was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to 60% of the average closing price during the 10 trading-day period ending on the trading day prior to conversion. On August 1, 2020, the JRF Investor elected to convert the entire JRF Note into Company common stock and was subsequently issued 111,359 shares of Company common stock in conversion thereof.

On August 4, 2020, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with DGF Services, Inc. The note is for $10,000 bearing interest at 7% per annum and has a conversion price of $0.60 per share. The note matures on February 3, 2021. On March 15, 2021, the Company issued 17,405 shares of common stock for the conversion of principal and interest of $10,456. See Note 9.

On August 18, 2020, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with Power Up Lending Group pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the Investor an 8% Convertible Promissory Note, dated August 18, 2020, in the principal amount of $128,000. The note was funded by the Investor on August 18, 2020, and on such date pursuant to the securities purchase agreement, the Company reimbursed the Investor for expenses for legal fees and due diligence of $2,000. The securities purchase agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and customary closing conditions. The note matures 12 months after the date of the note on August 17, 2021. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock beginning on the date which is 180 days from the date of the note, at a conversion price equal to 65% multiplied by the lowest closing bid price during the 20 trading day period ending on the last complete trading day prior to the date of conversion; provided, however, that the Investor may not convert the note to the extent that such conversion would result in the Investor’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock being in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The beneficial ownership limitation may not be waived by the Investor. The note carries a prepayment penalty if the note is paid off in 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, or 180 days following the note date. The prepayment penalty is based on the then-outstanding principal at the time of payoff, plus accrued and unpaid interest, multiplied by 112%, 115%, 118%, 125%, 130%, and 135% respectively. After the expiration of 180 days following the issue date, the Company shall have no right of prepayment. On February 16, 2021, the Company paid the note, accrued interest and prepayment penalty in full.

On February 4, 2021, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with Power Up Lending Group pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the Investor an 8% Convertible Promissory Note, dated February 4, 2021, in the principal amount of $127,000. The note was funded by the Investor on February 4, 2021, and on such date pursuant to the securities purchase agreement, the Company reimbursed the Investor for expenses for legal fees and due diligence of $2,000. The securities purchase agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and customary closing conditions. The note matures 12 months after the date of the note on February 4, 2022. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock beginning on the date which is 180 days from the date of the note, at a conversion price equal to 65% multiplied by the lowest closing bid price during the 20 trading day period ending on the last complete trading day prior to the date of conversion; provided, however, that the Investor may not convert the note to the extent that such conversion would result in the Investor’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock being in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The beneficial ownership limitation may not be waived by the Investor. The note carries a prepayment penalty if the note is paid off in 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, or 180 days following the note date. The prepayment penalty is based on the then-outstanding principal at the time of payoff, plus accrued and unpaid interest, multiplied by 112%, 115%, 118%, 125%, 130%, and 135% respectively. After the expiration of 180 days following the issue date, the Company shall have no right of prepayment. On August 2, 2021, the Company paid the note, accrued interest and prepayment penalty in full.

On February 16, 2021, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with Power Up Lending Group pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the Investor an 8% Convertible Promissory Note, dated February 16, 2021, in the principal amount of $78,750. The note was funded by the Investor on February 16, 2021, and on such date pursuant to the securities purchase agreement, the Company reimbursed the Investor for expenses for legal fees and due diligence of $2,000. The securities purchase agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and customary closing conditions. The note matures 12 months after the date of the note on February 16, 2022. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock beginning on the date which is 180 days from the date of the note, at a conversion price equal to 65% multiplied by the lowest closing bid price during the 20 trading day period ending on the last complete trading day prior to the date of conversion; provided, however, that the Investor may not convert the note to the extent that such conversion would result in the Investor’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock being in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The beneficial ownership limitation may not be waived by the Investor. The note carries a prepayment penalty if the note is paid off in 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, or 180 days following the note date. The prepayment penalty is based on the then-outstanding principal at the time of payoff, plus accrued and unpaid interest, multiplied by 112%, 115%, 118%, 125%, 130%, and 135% respectively. After the expiration of 180 days following the issue date, the Company shall have no right of prepayment. On August 11, 2021, the Company paid the note, accrued interest and prepayment penalty in full.

Effective February 16, 2021, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with AES Capital Management, LLC, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to an 8% Convertible Redeemable Promissory Note (“AES Note”) in the principal amount of $78,750. The AES Note was funded by the investor on February 16, 2021, and on such date pursuant to AES Note, the Company reimbursed the investor for loan fees of $3,750, receiving net funding of $75,000. On August 26, 2021, the Company paid the note, accrued interest and prepayment penalty in full.

On March 26, 2021, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with Leonite Capital LLC (“Leonite”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the Investor an 8% Convertible Promissory Note, dated March 26, 2021, in the principal amount of $568,182. The note was funded by the Investor on March 26, 2021, and on such date pursuant to the securities purchase agreement, the Company reimbursed the Investor for expenses for legal fees and due diligence of $2,000. The securities purchase agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and customary closing conditions. The note matures 12 months after the date of the note on March 26, 2022. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock beginning on the date which is 180 days from the date of the note, at a conversion price equal to 65% multiplied by the lowest closing bid price during the 20 trading day period ending on the last complete trading day prior to the date of conversion; provided, however, that the Investor may not convert the note to the extent that such conversion would result in the Investor’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock being in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The beneficial ownership limitation may not be waived by the Investor. The note carries a prepayment penalty if the note is paid off in 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, or 180 days following the note date. The prepayment penalty is based on the then-outstanding principal at the time of payoff, plus accrued and unpaid interest, multiplied by 112%, 115%, 118%, 125%, 130%, and 135% respectively. After the expiration of 180 days following the issue date, the Company shall have no right of prepayment. The financing required the Company to issue 65,000 shares of common stock to Leonite (see Note 9).

On April 21, 2021, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “GS Capital SPA”) with GS Capital Partners, LLC, a New York limited liability company, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the investor a 5% Convertible Redeemable Promissory Note (the “GS Capital Note”), dated April 21, 2021, in the principal amount of $85,750. The GS Capital Note included a $8,000 original issue discount, and was funded by the investor on April 22, 2021, and on such date pursuant to the GS Capital SPA, the Company reimbursed the investor for legal fees of $3,750, receiving net funding of $74,000. The GS Capital SPA includes customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and customary closing conditions. The GS Capital Note matures 12 months after the date of the note on April 21, 2022. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at any time at a conversion price equal to 65% multiplied by the lowest closing bid price during the 20 trading day period prior to the date of conversion (and including the conversion date); provided, however, that the investor may not convert the note to the extent that such conversion would result in the investor’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock being in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The note carries a prepayment penalty if it is paid off in 180 days following the note date. The prepayment penalty is based on the then-outstanding principal at the time of payoff, plus accrued and unpaid interest, multiplied by 105% if prepaid within 60 days, 120% if prepaid from 61 days-120 days, and 125% if prepaid between 121 days-180 days of issuance. After the expiration of 180 days, the Company shall have no right of prepayment. On October 27, 2021, the Company issued 52,848 shares of common stock for the conversion of principal and interest of $11,027. On November 17, 2021, the Company issued 83,043 shares of common stock for the conversion of principal and interest of $8,745. On December 13, 2021, the Company issued 224,964 shares of common stock for the conversion of principal and interest of $8,774. See Note 9. As of December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance of this note was $58,000.

On April 20, 2021, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Power Up SPA”) with Power Up Lending Group Ltd., a Virginia corporation, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the investor a 5% Convertible Promissory Note (the “Power Up Note”), dated April 20, 2021, in the principal amount of $82,000. The Power Up Note was funded by the investor on April 23, 2021, and on such date pursuant to the Power Up SPA, the Company reimbursed the investor for expenses for legal fees and due diligence of $2,000, receiving net funding of $80,000. The Power Up SPA includes customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and customary closing conditions. The Power Up Note matures 12 months after the date of the Power Up Note on April 20, 2022. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock beginning on the date which is 180 days from the date of the note, at a conversion price equal to 65% multiplied by the lowest closing bid price during the 20 trading day period ending on the last complete trading day prior to the date of conversion; provided, however, that the investor may not convert the note to the extent that such conversion would result in the investor’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock being in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The beneficial ownership limitation may not be waived by the investor. The note carries a prepayment penalty if the note is paid off in 180 days following the note date. The prepayment penalty is based on the then-outstanding principal at the time of payoff, plus accrued and unpaid interest, multiplied by 125%. After the expiration of 180 days following the issue date, the Company shall have no right of prepayment. On October 20, 2021, the Company paid the note, accrued interest and prepayment penalty in full.

On May 4, 2021, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with Metrospaces, Inc., a Florida corporation, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the investor a 5% Convertible Redeemable Note, dated April 4, 2021, in the principal amount of $50,000. The note was funded by the investor on May 4, 2021, with the Company receiving funding of $50,000. The securities purchase agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and customary closing conditions. The note matures 12 months after the date of the note on May 4, 2022. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at any time at a conversion price equal to 65% multiplied by the lowest closing price during the 20 trading day period prior to the date of conversion (and including the conversion date); provided, however, that the investor may not convert the note to the extent that such conversion would result in the investor’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock being in excess of 9.9% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The note carries a prepayment penalty if it is paid off in 180 days following the note date. The prepayment penalty is based on the then-outstanding principal at the time of payoff, plus accrued and unpaid interest, multiplied by 115% if prepaid within 60 days, 120% if prepaid from 61 days-120 days, and 125% if prepaid between 121 days-180 days of issuance. After the expiration of 180 days, the Company shall have no right of prepayment.

On August 13, 2021, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with Geneva Roth Remark Holdings, Inc., a New York corporation, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the investor a Convertible Note, dated August 13, 2021, in the principal amount of $250,375. The Note included a $25,375 original issue discount and was funded by the investor on August 13, 2021, with the Company receiving funding of $225,000. The note carries a one-time interest charge of 10% of $25,037. The note has mandatory monthly payments of $27,541 starting on September 30, 2021 until the note is paid in full. The securities purchase agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and customary closing conditions. The note matures 12 months after the date of the note on August 13, 2022. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at any time at a conversion price equal to 75% multiplied by the lowest closing price during the previous trading day period prior to the date of conversion (and including the conversion date); provided, however, that the investor may not convert the note to the extent that such conversion would result in the investor’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock being in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The Company made the first note payment on $27,541 prior to September 30, 2021. However, the Company has not made any of the required payments for October, November and December 2021 as required by the note agreement.

On October 5, 2021, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Jefferson SPA”) with Jefferson Street Capital, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the investor a 10% Convertible Redeemable Promissory Note (the “Jefferson Note”), dated October 5, 2021, in the principal amount of $275,000. The Jefferson Note included a $25,000 original issue discount, and was funded by the investor on October 13, 2021, and on such date pursuant to the Jefferson Note, the Company reimbursed the investor for loan fees of $20,000, receiving net funding of $230,000. The Jefferson SPA includes customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and customary closing conditions. The Jefferson Note matures on August 20, 2022. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at any time at a conversion price equal to 75% multiplied by the lowest closing bid price during the 10 trading day period prior to the date of conversion (and including the conversion date); provided, however, that the investor may not convert the note to the extent that such conversion would result in the investor’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock being in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. As of December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance of this note was $275,000.

On October 19, 2021, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Sixth Street SPA”) with Sixth Street Lending, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the investor a 5% Convertible Redeemable Promissory Note (the “Sixth St Note”), dated October 19, 2021, in the principal amount of $87,500. The Sixth St Note was funded by the investor on October 22, 2021, and on such date pursuant to the Sixth St Note, the Company reimbursed the investor for loan fees of $2,500, receiving net funding of $85,000. The Sixth Street SPA includes customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and customary closing conditions. The Sixth St Note matures on October 19, 2022. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock beginning on the date which is 180 days from the date of the note, at a conversion price equal to 65% multiplied by the lowest closing bid price during the 20 trading day period ending on the last complete trading day prior to the date of conversion; provided, however, that the investor may not convert the note to the extent that such conversion would result in the investor’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock being in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The beneficial ownership limitation may not be waived by the investor. The note carries a prepayment penalty if the note is paid off in 180 days following the note date. The prepayment penalty is based on the then-outstanding principal at the time of payoff, plus accrued and unpaid interest, multiplied by 125%. After the expiration of 180 days following the issue date, the Company shall have no right of prepayment. As of December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance of this note was $87,500.

NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

All related party transactions are recorded at the exchange amount which is the value established and agreed to by the related party. Mr. William Alessi, CEO, is the Principal Executive Officer and director of the Company. The JanBella Group is an entity controlled by Mr. Alessi. Chris Chumas is a director and a minority shareholder of the Company.

A payable to a related party of $17,574 to Maurice Bideaux, the Company’s former chief executive officer and director, was forgiven by Mr. Bideaux in 2010. An additional advance from Mr. Bideaux of $38,910 was forgiven by Mr. Bideaux in 2021.

On July 18, 2019, the Company issued promissory notes to Mr. Alessi, JanBella Group and Mr. Chumas to evidence the amounts they advanced to the Company. The notes are due on demand, bear interest at 10% per year, and are secured by all of the Company's assets. At the option of the noteholders, the notes may be converted into shares of the Company's common stock. The number of shares which will be issued upon any conversion of the notes will be determined by dividing the principal amount to be converted (plus, at the option of the noteholder, accrued and unpaid interest) by the lower of (i) $0.001 or, (ii) 50% of the lowest bid price during the forty-five consecutive trading day period ending on the trading day immediately prior to the conversion date.

On January 29, 2020, the Company issued 7,000,000 shares of its common stock to each of William Alessi and Chris Chumas, respectively, for partial conversion of their promissory notes in the principal amount of $7,000 each, respectively.

On October 15, 2021, the Company paid $50,287 to both Mr. Alessi and Mr. Chumas as payments against the promissory notes held by these individuals.

The following table presents principal amounts due, and common and preferred shares held by William Alessi and Chris Chumas as of December 31, 2021:

_________ 

⁽¹⁾ Includes 6,971,000 shares held in the name of Mr. Alessi’s trust, and 50 shares held in the name of Mr. Alessi’s IRA.

⁽²⁾ Mr. Alessi’s entity.

See Part II – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds regarding the sale of unregistered securities and use of proceeds.

NOTE 7 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

The Company analyzed the conversion option for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and hedging, and determined that the instrument should be classified as a liability since the conversion option becomes effective at issuance resulting in there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options. The Company determined our derivative liabilities to be a Level 3 fair value measurement and used the Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate the fair value as of September 30, 2020. The Black-Scholes model requires six basic data inputs: the exercise or strike price, time to expiration, the risk-free interest rate, the current stock price, the estimated volatility of the stock price in the future, and the dividend rate. Changes to these inputs could produce a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. The fair value of each convertible note is estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the assumptions utilized in estimating fair values of the liabilities measured on a recurring basis are as follows:

The fair value measurements of the derivative liabilities at December 31, 2021 is summarized:

The fair value measurements of the derivative liabilities at December 31, 2020 is summarized:

NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Matters

The Company is subject, from time to time, to claims by third parties under various legal disputes. The defense of such claims, or any adverse outcome relating to any such claims, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity, financial condition and cash flows. As of December 31, 2021, the Company did not have any legal actions pending against it.

Commitments

The Company entered into various Seed Resale Agreements to sell Hemp seeds to growers. The Company is obligated to purchase from the growers’ minimum future quantities of hemp biomass.

NOTE 9 – CAPITAL STOCK

On January 29, 2020, the Company issued 7,000,000 shares of its common stock to each of William Alessi and Chris Chumas, respectively, for partial conversion of promissory notes in the principal amount of $7,000 each, respectively.

On February 28, 2020, the Company entered into a Branding Agreement (the “Branding Agreement”) with Spire Holdings, LLC (“Spire”), pursuant to which the Company would immediately issue Spire 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Spire Shares”), and Spire would provide the Company (i) 7 primary NASCAR Cup Series No. 77 entry automobile, team and drivers (“Car”) sponsorships, and (ii) 25 associate or secondary sponsorships in connection with the Car, subject to NASCAR and network television approval. Pursuant to the Branding Agreement, Spire has some anti-dilution protection and piggyback registration rights with respect to the Spire Shares.

On July 29, 2020, the Company sold a third party investor (the “Investor”) the following securities (the “Securities”) for an aggregate purchase price of $250,000: (i) 250,000 shares of the Series B-1 Preferred Stock, (ii) non-cashless warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock for $1.00 per share terminating on January 21, 2021, (iii) non-cashless warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock for $1.00 per share terminating on July 21, 2021, and (iv) non-cashless warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock for $1.00 per share terminating on January 21, 2022.

Effective July 1, 2020, Scott Shellady was appointed to serve as the Chief Strategic Officer of the Company. On June 24, 2020, the Company entered into a consulting services agreement with Mr. Shellady, pursuant to which Mr. Shellady would (i) render marketing, sales, distribution, and branding services to the Company; and (ii) would be paid $5,000 per month and 100,000 shares of Company common stock for services rendered during the initial term from July 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020.

Effective July 31, 2020, the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note to JRF AZ Investments II, LP in the principal amount of $60,000, which was funded on July 31, 2020. The Note matured six months after the date of the Note and was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to 60% of the average closing price during the 10-trading day period ending on the trading day prior to conversion. On August 1, 2020, JRF AZ Investments II, LP elected to convert the entire Note into Company common stock and was subsequently issued 111,359 shares of Company common stock in conversion thereof.

On August 24, 2020, with an effective date of July 1, 2020, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with Paul Hervey (“Hervey”), an individual, for the purpose of cultivating hemp. Hervey is a licensed hemp cultivator in good standing under the laws of North Carolina with approximately 3,700 square feet of greenhouse cultivation space and approximately 9 acres of farmable land (the “Facility”). Under the joint venture agreement, Good Hemp will contribute up to $160,000 for the preparation of the Facility, as well as up to $174,000 as ongoing operational expenses for the joint venture, and Hervey will contribute exclusive use of the Facility, as well as purchase services and/or purchase or lease necessary equipment for the planting, cultivation and irrigation for growing hemp, and profits shall be split equally by the parties after reimbursement of expenses paid by the parties. The joint venture shall conduct business under the name “Olin Farms, LLC”. On or about August 20, 2020, the Company compensated Hervey $53,433.33 for the initial expenses of the joint venture. The payment was made as follows: (i) a check payable to Hervey in the amount of $33,433.33, and (ii) the issuance of 40,000 shares of Company common stock in lieu of a $20,000 cash payment.

On March 15, 2021, the Company issued 30,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for services.

On March 23, 2021, the Company issued 17,405 shares of common stock to DGF Services, Inc. for a conversion of $10,456 in convertible debt. See Note 5.

On March 25, 2021, the Company issued 65,000 shares of common stock to Leonite in conjunction with financing. See Note 5.

On June 16, 2021, the Company issued 166,400 shares of common stock to two investors under the S-1 registration at $1.25 per share for a total of $208,000 in cash.

On July 26, 2021, the Company issued 60,000 shares of common stock to one investor under the S-1 registration at $1.25 per share for a total of $75,000 in cash.

On July 30, 2021, an investor (the “Investor”) exercised a non-cashless warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock for $1.00 per share for $250,000 in cash.

On July 30, 2021, the investor holding 500,000 shares of Series B-2 Preferred Stock converted these shares into 833,333 common shares according to the conversion rights.

On August 27, 2021, two warrant holders exercised cashless warrants. The Company issued 8,808 shares of common stock in relation to these warrants being exercised.

On October 27, 2021, the Company issued 52,848 shares of common stock to GS Capital, LLC for a conversion of $11,027 in convertible debt. See Note 5.

On November 17, 2021, the Company issued 83,043 shares of common stock to GS Capital, LLC for a conversion of $8,745 in convertible debt. See Note 5.

On December 13, 2021, the Company issued 224,964 shares of common stock to GS Capital, LLC for a conversion of $8,774 in convertible debt. See Note 5.

See Part II – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds regarding the sale of unregistered securities and use of proceeds.

NOTE 10 – JOINT VENTURE

On August 24, 2020, with an effective date of July 1, 2020, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with Paul Hervey (“Hervey”) for the purpose of cultivating hemp. Hervey is a licensed hemp cultivator in good standing under the laws of North Carolina with approximately 3,700 square feet of greenhouse cultivation space and approximately 9 acres of farmable land (the “Facility”). Under the joint venture agreement, Good Hemp will contribute up to $160,000 for the preparation of the Facility, as well as up to $174,000 as ongoing operational expenses for the joint venture, and Hervey will contribute exclusive use of the Facility, as well as purchase services and/or purchase or lease necessary equipment for the planting, cultivation and irrigation for growing hemp, and profits shall be split equally by the parties after reimbursement of expenses paid by the parties. The joint venture shall conduct business under the name “Olin Farms, LLC”. On or about August 20, 2020, the Company compensated Hervey $53,433.33 for the initial expenses of the joint venture. The payment was made as follows: (i) a check payable to Hervey in the amount of $33,433.33, and (ii) the issuance of 40,000 shares of Company common stock in lieu of a $20,000 cash payment. On or about August 21, 2020, the Company made an initial cash contribution to Olin Farms, LLC, in the amount of $10,000.00. In October 2021, the Company made the decision to terminate this joint venture and all operations have been stopped and Olin Farms, LLC was dissolved. The Company recognized a loss on investment of $66,655.

NOTE 11 – INCOME TAXES

The company operates in the United States; accordingly, federal and state income taxes have been provided based upon the tax laws and rates of the United States deferred taxes are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates, which will be in effect when these differences reverse.

The Company is subject to United States income taxes at a rate of 21%. The reconciliation of the provision for income taxes at the United States statutory rate compared to the Company’s income tax expense as reported is as follows:

NOTE 12 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

The Company decided during the year to discontinue operations of its majority owned subsidiary, Good Hemp Wellness, LLC. In October 2021, the Company dissolved this entity in accordance with the laws and regulations of North Carolina.

In accordance with the provisions of ASC 205-20, there were no assets and liabilities to reflect as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.

In accordance with the provisions of ASC 205-20, the Company has not included in the results of continuing operations the results of operations of the discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The results of operations for this entity for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 have been reflected as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, and consist of the following:

In accordance with the provisions of ASC 205-20, the Company has separately reported the cash flow activity of the discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The cash flow activity from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 have been reflected as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and consist of the following:

NOTE 13 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated all transactions from December 31, 2021, through the financial statement issuance date for subsequent event disclosure consideration and noted no significant subsequent event that needs to be disclosed other than as set forth below.

On March 8, 2022, the Company entered into a Plan and Agreement of Merger (the “PXS Merger Agreement”) with Petro X Solutions, Inc. (“PXS”), a Wyoming corporation, pursuant to which a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company will merge (the “PXS Merger”) with and into PXS, with PXS becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary as a result of the PXS Merger. Pursuant to the PXS Merger Agreement, an aggregate of 100,000,000 shares of Company common stock will be issued to the shareholders of PXS in the PXS Merger. The PXS Merger closing is to occur upon the satisfaction of several conditions, including (i) customary closing conditions, including the receipt of necessary approval from each of the Company and PXS, the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the other party, performance by the other party of its obligations under the PXS Merger Agreement, and the absence of any material adverse changes in the condition of the other party, and (ii) the reformation of promissory notes payable to our current management.

On March 14, 2022, the Company entered into another Plan and Agreement of Merger dated March 9, 2022 (the "Restoration Merger Agreement"), with Restoration Artechs, Inc. ("Restoration"), a California corporation, pursuant to which a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company will merge (the "Restoration Merger") with and into Restoration, with Restoration becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary as a result of the Restoration Merger. Pursuant to the Restoration Merger Agreement, 25,000,000 shares of Company common stock will be issued to the shareholder of Restoration in the Restoration Merger. The Restoration Merger closing is to occur upon the satisfaction of several conditions, including (i) customary closing conditions, including the receipt of necessary approval from each of the Company and Restoration, the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the other party, performance by the other party of its obligations under the Restoration Merger Agreement, and the absence of any material adverse changes in the condition of the other party, and (ii) the reformation of promissory notes payable to our current management.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, there have been no disagreements with our independent registered public accounting firm on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of the accounting firm would have caused them to make reference thereto in their report on the financial statements.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act were not effective as of December 31, 2021, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, and summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and our disclosure controls and procedures were also ineffective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive and financial officers to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of the CEO to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal controls over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records which in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the Company’s assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

In evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, management used the criteria established in the Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on the criteria established by COSO, management (with the participation of the CEO and CFO) identified the following material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, which arose from the limited number of number of staff at the Company and the inability to achieve proper segregation of duties:

As a result of these material weaknesses, management concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Security and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

The Company’s management, including the CEO and acting CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of the control system must reflect that there are resource constraints and that the benefits must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Except as set forth above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The following table sets for the names, ages and positions of our board members and executive officers as of March 23, 2022:

Directors are generally elected at an annual shareholders’ meeting and hold office until the next annual shareholders’ meeting, or until their successors are elected and qualified. Executive officers are elected by directors and serve at the board’s discretion.

Mr. Alessi, appointed as a member of our Board of Directors and our Chief Executive Officer and President on February 10, 2018, has been the Founder and CEO of Alpha Modus, Corp., a software and technology company, since August 2014, and the Managing Director of Hybrid Titan Management, LLC since September 11, 2000. He was formerly the interim CEO of RMD Entertainment Group, Inc. from April of 2017 through October of 2017, and was the interim CEO of Land Star, Inc. from April of 2017 to December of 2017. On December 10, 2021, Mr. Alessi resigned as CEO of the Company but remained the President of the Company. On or about January 14, 2022, was reappointed as our CEO.   

Mr. Chumas, appointed as a member of our Board of Directors on July 11, 2019, served as an IBM sales executive from 2008-2017. In 2017, he began working with erwin, Inc. as an Enterprise Solution Strategist. He also serves as the Chief Strategy Officer and on the Board of Alpha Modus, Corp. since 2018.

Mr. Sperry, appointed as our Chief Financial Officer on June 22, 2021, has fifteen years of experience in public company accounting. His industry background includes audits for both private and publicly traded companies in various industries including manufacturing, distribution, mining, energy, and not for profit organizations. He has served as outside controller for several public companies over the last eleven years and has been responsible for SEC filings and compliance. Mr. Sperry was a licensed CPA in the State of Utah from February 2001 through September 2014, and he has operated his own accounting and business consulting practice for the past twelve years. He obtained his Bachelor’s degree in accounting from Westminster College and his Master’s degree in business administration (MBA) from Utah State University.

The Company believes that its directors are qualified to serve as directors due to their experience in the capital markets and retail industries, and their general business knowledge.

The Company does not have an independent director, as that term is defined in Section 803 of the NYSE Company Guide. The Company does not have a financial expert.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Pursuant to Section 78.7502 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, we have the power to indemnify any person made a party to any lawsuit by reason of being a director or officer of the Company, or serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. Our articles of incorporation provide that the Company shall indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada law.

With regard to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Corporation in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the common shares being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by a controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and will be governed by the final adjudication of such case.

Director Compensation

There are no formal agreements with our directors for compensation, although they have received shares for their services from time to time.

Director Independence

During the period ended December 31, 2021, we had no independent directors.

Involvement on Certain Material Legal Proceedings During the Last Five Years

No director, officer, significant employee or consultant has been convicted in a criminal proceeding, exclusive of traffic violations.

No bankruptcy petitions have been filed by or against any business or property of any director, officer, significant employee or consultant of the Company nor has any bankruptcy petition been filed against a partnership or business association where these persons were general partners or executive officers.

No director, officer, significant employee or consultant has been permanently or temporarily enjoined, barred, suspended or otherwise limited from involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities.

No director, officer or significant employee has been convicted of violating a federal or state securities or commodities law.

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance

The Company maintains directors’ and officers’ liability insurance insuring our directors and officers against liability for acts or omissions in their capacities as directors or officers.

Code of Ethics

We intend to adopt a code of ethics that applies to our officers, directors and employees, including our principal executive officer and principal accounting officer, but have not done so to date due to our relatively small size. We intend to adopt a written code of ethics in the near future.

Board Composition

Our By-Laws provide that the Board of Directors shall consist of not less than one nor more than fifteen directors. Each director of the Company serves until his successor is elected and qualified, subject to removal by the Company’s majority shareholders. Each officer shall hold their offices for such terms and shall exercise such powers and perform such duties as shall be determined by the Board of Directors and shall hold his office until his successor is elected and qualified, or until his earlier resignation or removal.

No Committees of the Board of Directors; No Financial Expert

We do not presently have a separately constituted audit committee, compensation committee, nominating committee, executive committee or any other committees of our Board of Directors. Nor do we have an audit committee or financial expert. Management has determined not to establish an audit committee at present because our limited resources and limited operating activities do not warrant the formation of an audit committee or the expense of doing so. As such, our entire Board of Directors acts as our audit committee. We do not have a financial expert serving on the Board of Directors or employed as an officer based on management’s belief that the cost of obtaining the services of a person who meets the criteria for a financial expert under Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K is beyond our limited financial resources and the financial skills of such an expert are simply not required or necessary for us to maintain effective internal controls and procedures for financial reporting in light of the limited scope and simplicity of accounting issues raised in our financial statements at this stage of our development.

Compliance with Section 16(A) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own 10% or more of a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership with the SEC. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the rules and regulations of the SEC to furnish the Company with copies of all reports filed by them in compliance with Section 16(a).

Based solely on our review of certain reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the reports required to be filed with respect to transactions in our common stock during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, were timely, except that Ms. Setzer and Mr. Shellady did not timely file a Form 3 or Form 4 upon their appointments as executive officers of the Company.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The following table summarizes the compensation earned by the Company’s principal executive officers during the two years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

Summary Compensation Table