FIFG First Foods Group Inc (QB)

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Our current and prospective investors should carefully consider the following risks and all other information contained in this report, including our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” before making investment decisions regarding our securities. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face, but include the most significant factors currently known by us. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, also may become important factors that affect us. If any of the following risks materialize, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially harmed. In that case, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose some or all of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business:

We have limited operating history, our financial position is not robust, and we lack profitable operations to date.

The Company has incurred net losses since inception and will likely continue to incur net losses while it builds its business and as such it may not achieve or maintain profitability. The Company’s limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate its business and prospects, and there is no assurance that the business of the Company will grow or that it will become profitable. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had a purchase concentration of 49% and 14% from two vendors. The concentration of the Company’s purchases creates a potential risk to future supply in the event that the Company is not able to obtain supplies from other vendors.

We have limited cash on hand which creates substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

In their reports for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, our auditors have expressed that substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern. We have incurred operating losses since our formation and expect to incur losses and negative operating cash flows for the twelve months following the audit report. We also expect to continue to incur significant operating and capital expenditures and anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially in the foreseeable future. As a result, we will need to generate significant revenues or otherwise raise funds in order to achieve and maintain profitability. Our failure to achieve or maintain profitability could negatively impact the value of our common stock.

We will need additional financing which may not be available.

Since our formation, we have raised substantial equity and debt financing to support the growth of our business. Because we intend to continue to make investments to support the growth of our business, we require additional capital to pursue our business objectives and growth strategy and respond to business opportunities, challenges or unforeseen circumstances, including participating in merchant cash advances. Accordingly, on a regular basis we need, or we may need, to engage in equity or debt financings to secure additional funds. However, additional funds may not be available when we need them, in amounts we need, on terms that are acceptable to us or at all. Volatility in the credit markets in general or in the market for small business or merchant cash advances in particular may also have an adverse effect on our ability to obtain debt financing. Furthermore, the cost of our borrowing may increase due to market volatility, changes in the risk premiums required by lenders or if traditional sources of debt capital are unavailable. Volatility or depressed valuations or trading prices in the equity markets may similarly adversely affect our ability to obtain equity financing. If we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock. In particular, we may require additional access to capital to support our merchant cash advance participation. In order to participate in merchant cash advances, we have used, and expect to continue to use, our available cash on hand. If we are unable to adequately maintain our cash resources, we may delay non-essential capital expenditures; implement cost cutting procedures; delay or reduce future hiring; or reduce our rate of future participation compared to the current level. There can be no assurance that we can obtain sufficient sources of external capital to support the growth of our business. Delays in doing so or failure to do so may require us to reduce merchant cash advance participation or reduce our operations, which would harm our ability to pursue our business objectives as well as harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may not be successful in our potential business combinations.

The Company may, in the future, pursue acquisitions of other complementary businesses. The Company may also pursue strategic alliances and joint ventures that leverage its core industry experience to expand its product offerings and geographic presence. The Company has limited experience with respect to acquiring other companies and limited experience with respect to forming collaborations, strategic alliances and joint ventures. If the Company were to make any acquisitions, it may not be able to integrate these acquisitions successfully into its existing business and could assume unknown or contingent liabilities. Any future acquisitions the Company makes could also result in large and immediate write-offs or the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, any of which could harm the Company’s operating results. Integrating an acquired company also may require management resources that otherwise would be available for ongoing development of the Company’s existing business.

If we fail to attract and retain key personnel, our business and operating results may be harmed.

Our future success depends to a significant degree on the skills, experience and efforts of key personnel in our senior management, whose vision for our company, knowledge of our business and expertise would be difficult to replace. If any one of our key personnel leaves, is unable to work, or fails to perform and we are unable to find a qualified replacement, we may be unable to execute our business strategy.

The specialty food industry is very competitive, which may result in limited revenue for us, as well as increased expenses associated with marketing our products.

The specialty food business is highly competitive. We have retained a Chief Marketing Officer to expand our wholesale and retail market presence. We plan to compete against other providers of quality foods, some of which sell their services globally, and some of these providers have considerably greater resources than we have. These competitors may have greater marketing and sales capacity, established distribution networks, significant goodwill and global name recognition.

We may license our Holy Cacao name, brand, and recipes, and sell the Company’s Holy Cacao packaging material in those states where such activity is legal.

New legislation or regulation, or the application of existing laws and regulations to the medical and consumer hemp industries could add additional costs and risks to doing business. We and our licensees, if any, will be subject to regulations applicable to businesses generally and laws or regulations directly applicable to communications over the Internet and access to e-commerce. It is reasonable to assume that as hemp use becomes more mainstream that the FDA and or other federal, state and local governmental agencies will impose regulations covering the purity, privacy, quality control, security and many other aspects of the industry, all of which will likely raise the cost of compliance thereby reducing profits or even making it more difficult to continue operations, either of which scenarios, if they occur, could have a negative impact on our business and operations.

The market may not readily accept our products.

Demand and market acceptance for our licensed brand and packaging for our hemp infused products are subject to a high level of uncertainty. This will also be true as we try to expand into the wholesaling of additional health-related products. The successful introduction of any new product requires a focused, efficient strategy to create awareness of and desire for the products. Our marketing strategy may be unsuccessful and is subject to change as a result of a number of factors, including changes in market conditions (including the emergence of new market segments which in our judgment can be readily exploited through the use of our technology), the nature of possible license and distribution arrangements and strategic alliances which may become available to us in the future and general economic, regulatory and competitive factors. There can be no assurance that our strategy will result in successful product commercialization or that our efforts will result in initial or continued market acceptance for our buyer’s proposed products. We currently have only limited resources to enhance our technology or to develop new products.

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, competitors may be able to use our technology or trademarks, which could weaken our competitive position.

We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights. We also intend to enter into confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, consultants and customers, and control access to and distribution of our packaging and other proprietary information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products.

We have entered into the Merchant Cash Advance (“MCA”) business which carries separate risk from the food industry.

Reliance on proprietary merchant cash advance credit models, which involve the use of qualitative factors that are inherently judgmental, could result in merchant defaults which would affect our profitability.

The MCA participations and MCA’s that we own will be relatively illiquid, and we may not be able to liquidate those investments in a timely manner.

Any MCA participations and MCA’s that we make or otherwise acquire will likely be relatively illiquid with no established market for their purchase and sale, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to liquidate those investments in a timely manner. Although these investments will likely generate income, the return of capital and the realization of gains, if any, from such investments generally will occur only upon the partial or complete disposition of such MCA participation or advance, or its repayment or collection.

Our MCA participations and advances may become uncollectible, and large amounts of uncollectible participations and advances may materially affect our performance.

Our MCA participations and advances will be relatively illiquid and substantial risks are involved. Most, and possibly all, of the merchants who receive cash advances from the MCA providers we use are required to sign a confession of judgement, which legally requires the merchant to pay back the advance, as long as the merchant continues as a going concern. Although we use background checks and other forms of due-diligence information to mitigate the risk of uncollectible debt resulting from bankruptcy, no assurance can be made that we will be able to do so. If our MCA portfolio contains a large portion of uncollectible debt, our performance will likely be negatively affected. In addition, if any business defaults on an MCA transaction, we may be required to expend monies in connection with foreclosure proceedings and other remedial actions, which expenditures could materially and adversely affect our financial performance. Although our MCA’s, both direct and syndicated, will be structured so as not to be characterized as loans, MCA’s present many of the same risks. For example, we may be unable to collect the full amount of the merchant cash advance receivable we acquire through an advance. In any such case, here again we may be required to expend monies in connection with remedial actions, which expenditures could materially and adversely affect our financial performance.

We will have the right to obtain credit lines as part of our investment strategy, even though we presently do not intend to do so. Any leverage we incur in building and growing our business may substantially increase our risk of loss.

Although we do not presently have intentions to obtain credit lines, we will not be restricted from doing so and we may in the future determine that this is an effective way to capitalize the Company. In such a case, the use of leverage (debt) may increase both net returns as well as risk since we may not be able to pay interest obligations associated with our own borrowing.

Our MCA participations may be concentrated, which could lead to increased risk.

Our MCA participations may be concentrated in a limited number of investments or investments to one business or affiliated businesses. Thus, our stockholders may have limited diversification. In addition, if we make an investment in a single transaction with the intent of refinancing or selling a portion of the investment, there is a risk that we will be unable to successfully complete such a refinancing or sale. This could lead to increased risk as a result of having an unintended long-term investment and reduced diversification.

If third parties default or file for bankruptcy, we could suffer losses.

We could suffer losses if our MCA recipients were to default. Any such default or bankruptcy could have a material and adverse impact on our results of operation, our financial condition and our business prospects.

We will incur increased costs and demands upon management as a result of complying with the laws and regulations affecting public companies, which could harm our results of operations and our ability to attract and retain qualified executives and board members.

As a public company we incur significant legal, accounting, and other expenses and these expenses will increase after we cease to be a “smaller reporting company.” In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and rules subsequently implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), impose various requirements on public companies, including requiring changes in corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, we expect these rules and regulations and future regulations will continue to increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time consuming and costly. For example, we expect these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or to incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. These rules and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or our board committees or as executive officers. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting annually and the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures quarterly. In particular, we are required to perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm potentially to attest to, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or “Section 404.” As long as we remain a “smaller reporting company” we may elect to avail ourselves of the exemption from the requirement that our independent registered public accounting firm attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404. However, we may no longer avail ourselves of this exemption when we cease to be a “smaller reporting company” and, when our independent registered public accounting firm is required to undertake an assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, the cost of our compliance with Section 404 will correspondingly increase. Our compliance with applicable provisions of Section 404 will require that we incur substantial accounting expense and expend significant management time on compliance-related issues as we implement additional corporate governance practices and comply with reporting requirements. Moreover, if we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 applicable to us in a timely manner, or if we or our independent registered public accounting firm identifies deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources. Furthermore, investor perceptions of our company may suffer if deficiencies are found, and this could cause a decline in the market price of our stock. Irrespective of compliance with Section 404, any failure of our internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our stated operating results and harm our reputation. We expect to have in place accounting, internal audit and other management systems and resources that will allow us to maintain compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act at the end of any phase-in periods permitted by Nasdaq, the NYSE, the SEC and the JOBS Act. If we are unable to implement these changes effectively or efficiently, it could harm our operations, financial reporting or financial results and could result in an adverse opinion on internal control from our independent registered public accounting firm.

Our business is subject to regulation, and changes in laws and regulations governing our business, or changes in the interpretation of such laws and regulations, could negatively affect our business.

Over the last few years, federal and state regulatory and other policymaking entities have taken an increased interest in marketplace and online lending, including online small business lending. For example, in July 2015, the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a public request for information regarding expanding access to credit through online marketplace lending. Activity in various states has also increased, including in the states of California and New York. In December 2015, the California Department of Business Oversight announced an inquiry into the marketplace lending industry and requested information from fourteen marketplace and online lenders. The New York Department of Financial Services opened a formal investigation of marketplace and online lending in March 2019. In May 2019, the Federal Trade Commission held a forum, “Strictly Business,” that explored small business lending practices, regulations, and policies. The forum consisted of three panels: (1) Overview of the Small Business Financing Marketplace, (2) Case Study on Merchant Cash Advances, and (3) Consumer Protection Risks and the Path Ahead. These initiatives were presented as information gathering projects to assist federal and state officials in better understanding, among other things, the methods, role and impact of online and marketplace lending on credit markets. These initiatives either have resulted, or are expected to result, in policy recommendations that could impact merchant cash advance business practices and operations, if the recommendations result in new laws or regulations. As of December 31, 2020, the above federal and state initiatives have not resulted in formal regulation that could foreclose the future of merchant cash advances as a viable financial product. However, the aforementioned regulatory authorities have continued to respond to complaints that provide a glimpse into what merchant cash advance companies should expect in a regulated future for the industry. In particular, authorities consistently warn against the recharacterization of merchant cash advances as loans, which provides significant guidance for not only the drafting of MCA agreements, but also the underwriting and marketing of MCA. Also, if a federal or state regulatory authority were to enact legislation requiring licensure by commercial lenders or imposing certain applicable rate caps or other provisions inconsistent with current merchant cash advance business practices and alternative solutions were not available, we could be required to reevaluate our participation in merchant cash advances. We expect these and other types of legislative and regulatory activities to continue in the future as marketplace and online lending grow and become the subject of greater public interest. For example, with the prospect of easing regulatory burdens at the federal level under the current administration, some states have indicated their intention to take more aggressive regulatory action. We cannot predict the outcome of these or other comparable future activities, when or whether they will lead to new laws, regulations or other actions or what they might be. However, the impact and cost of any possible future changes to laws or regulations could be substantial and could also require us to change our business practices and operations in a manner that adversely impacts our business. Changes in laws or regulations, including recent changes under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (and any related Treasury regulations, rules or interpretations, if and when issued), or the regulatory application or judicial interpretation of the laws and regulations applicable to us could adversely affect our ability to operate in the manner in which we currently conduct business or make it more difficult or costly for us to participate in merchant cash advances. A material failure to comply with any such laws or regulations could result in regulatory actions, lawsuits and damage to the merchant cash advance industry, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. A proceeding relating to one or more allegations or findings of our merchant cash advance provider’s violation of such laws could impair the ability to collect payments on advances or to participate in additional advances.

Public perception of merchant cash advance businesses as predatory or abusive could adversely affect our business.

In recent years, much of the media reporting on the merchant cash advance industry has focused on the cost to a small business for this type of financing arrangement, which is higher than the interest typically charged by traditional banking institutions in situations where they are willing to engage in traditional credit transactions. On occasion, media reports have characterized merchant cash advance businesses as predatory or abusive toward small business clients. If this negative characterization of our business becomes widely accepted, demand for our services could significantly decrease, which could adversely affect our results of operations primarily by decreasing our revenues. Negative perception of our business activities could also result in our industry being subject to more restrictive laws and regulations and greater exposure to litigation.

General economic conditions will likely affect our charge-offs and demand for our services, and accordingly, our results of operations could be adversely affected by a general economic slowdown or other negative economic conditions.

Provision for MCA participation losses and MCA losses, net of recoveries, may comprise one of our largest operating expenses. Any changes in economic factors that adversely affect MCA customers, such as an economic downturn or high unemployment, could result in higher loss experiences than anticipated, which could in turn adversely affect our charge-offs. Moreover, a sustained deterioration in the economy would likely cause a decrease in demand for merchant cash advance services. Any general economic conditions negatively affecting our charge-offs or demand for our services could materially and adversely affect our operating results.

When we make MCA’s either by ourselves or as part of a syndicated group, we will be subject to the risk of fraud by small business clients seeking the advance.

We will be subject to fraud risk whenever we make an MCA by ourselves or as part of a syndicated group. Small business recipients of the advance may, for example, present information that is false. In any such case, we will likely be unable to collect our receivable relating to an MCA. Widespread fraud of this type could adversely affect our operating results and the prospects for our business. This could also be a concern with respect to our MCA participations.

Coronavirus (“COVID-19”) creates significant uncertainty regarding potential business disruptions that could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) surfaced. The spread of COVID-19 around the world in 2020 has caused significant volatility in U.S. and international markets. There is significant uncertainty around the breadth and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19, as well as its impact on the U.S. and international economies and, as such, the Company is unable to determine if it will have a material impact to its operations in the future. The Company’s operations have been affected by the recent and ongoing outbreak of COVID-19 which in March 2020, was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The ultimate disruption which may be caused by the outbreak is uncertain; however, it has resulted in a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, MCA operations and cash flows. COVID-19 has not had an adverse impact on the Company’s primary operations; Holy Cacao. As of December 31, 2019, the Company disclosed areas that either have or may be affected include, but are not limited to, disruption to the Company’s customers and revenue, labor workforce, unavailability of products and supplies used in operations, and the decline in value of assets held by the Company, including, inventories and merchant cash advance receivables.

Risks Related to the Securities Markets and Ownership of Our Common and Preferred Stock

Our Common Stock is Subject to the “Penny Stock” Rules of the SEC and the Trading Market in our Securities is Limited, Which Makes Transactions in Our Stock Cumbersome and May Reduce the Value of an Investment in Our Stock.

The SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price, for warrants or options or conversion price for convertible notes, of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

Shares eligible for future sale under Rule 144 and/or Rule 905 may adversely affect the market for our securities.

From time to time, certain of our stockholders who hold restricted securities may be eligible to sell all or some of their shares of common stock by means of ordinary brokerage transactions in the open market pursuant to and reliant upon certain exceptions promulgated under the Securities Act. Although current stockholders may have no current intention or ability to sell their shares, any substantial sales by holders of our common stock in the future pursuant to such exceptions may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our securities.

The price of our common stock is subjected to volatility.

The market for the Company’s common stock may be highly volatile. The trading price of the Company’s common stock is subject to wide fluctuations in response to, among other things, quarterly variations in operating and financial results, and general economic and market conditions. In addition, statements or changes in opinions, ratings, or earnings estimates made by brokerage firms or industry analysts relating to their markets or relating to the Company could result in an immediate and adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. The highly volatile nature of the Company’s stock prices may cause investment losses for their shareholders. If securities class action litigation is brought against the Company, such litigation could result in substantial costs while diverting management’s attention and resources.

Our Board of Directors has sole discretion to create new classes of preferred stock.

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of preferred stock with such rights and preferences as our Board of Directors may determine from time to time in its sole discretion. Accordingly, under the Certificate of Incorporation, the Board may designate and issue preferred stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting, redemption or other rights that could impact the rights of the holders of our common shares.

Disruptions in global financial markets and deteriorating global economic conditions could cause lower returns to investors.

Disruptions in global financial markets and deteriorating global economic conditions could adversely affect the value of the Company’s common stock. The current state of the economy and the implications of future potential weakening may negatively impact market fundamentals, resulting in lower revenues and values for the Company’s business opportunities and investments.

If we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from quotation by the OTCQB, which would limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of shareholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

Companies quoted on the OTCQB must be current in their publicly filed reports containing information mandated under Section 13 of the Exchange Act, in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTCQB. If we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTCQB. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be adversely affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of shareholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

We have not voluntarily implemented various corporate governance measures.

Federal legislation, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has resulted in the adoption of various corporate governance measures designed to promote the integrity of the corporate management and the securities markets. Some of these measures have been adopted in response to legal requirements. Others have been adopted by companies in response to the requirements of national securities exchanges, such as the NYSE or Nasdaq, on which their securities are listed. As directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX 404”), the SEC has adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report of management on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting in its annual reports. While we expect to expend significant resources in developing the necessary documentation and testing procedures required by SOX 404, the Company as of this filing does not have effective controls. At present, there is no precedent available with which to measure compliance adequately. In the event we identify significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that we cannot remediate in a timely manner, investors and others may lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements and our ability to obtain equity or debt financing could suffer. Also, among the corporate governance measures that are required under the rules of national securities exchanges are those that address board of directors’ independence, audit committee oversight and the adoption of a Code of Ethics. The Company has not adopted exchange-mandated corporate governance measures and, since our securities are not listed on a national securities exchange, we are not required to do so. It is possible that if we were to adopt some or all of these corporate governance measures, stockholders would benefit from somewhat greater assurances that internal corporate decisions were being made by disinterested directors and that policies had been implemented to define responsible conduct. For example, in the absence of audit, nominating and compensation committees comprised of at least a majority of independent directors, decisions concerning matters such as compensation packages to our senior officers and recommendations for director nominees may be made by a majority of directors who have an interest in the outcome of the matters being decided. Prospective investors should bear in mind our current lack of corporate governance measures in formulating their investment decisions.

We have a large number of authorized but unissued shares of our common and preferred stock.

We have a large number of authorized but unissued shares of common and preferred stock, which our management may issue without further stockholder approval, thereby causing dilution of your holdings of our common stock. Our management will continue to have broad discretion to issue shares of our common and preferred stock in a range of transactions, including capital-raising transactions, mergers, acquisitions and other transactions, without obtaining stockholder approval. If our management determines to issue shares of our common or preferred stock with conversion rights or special voting rights from the large pool of authorized but unissued shares for any purpose in the future, your ownership position would be diluted without your further ability to vote on that transaction. Under the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, the Board of Directors may designate and issue preferred stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting, redemption or other rights that are senior in right to common stock. For example, the Company’s Class A Preferred Stock provides 50% voting rights to the Company’s two founding Directors.

Shares of our common stock may continue to be subject to illiquidity because our shares may continue to be thinly traded and may never become eligible for trading on a national securities exchange.

While we may at some point be able to meet the requirements necessary for our common stock to be listed on a national securities exchange, we cannot assure you that we will ever achieve a listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange. Our shares are currently only eligible for quotation on the OTCQB, which is not an exchange. Initial listing on a national securities exchange is subject to a variety of requirements, including minimum trading price and minimum public “float” requirements, and could also be affected by the general skepticism of such markets concerning companies that are the result of mergers with inactive publicly-held companies. There are also continuing eligibility requirements for companies listed on public trading markets. If we are unable to satisfy the initial or continuing eligibility requirements of any such market, then our stock may not be listed or could be delisted. This could result in a lower trading price for our common stock and may limit your ability to sell your shares, any of which could result in you losing some or all of your investments.

The market valuation of our business may fluctuate due to factors beyond our control and the value of your investment may fluctuate correspondingly.

The market valuation of smaller reporting companies, such as us, frequently fluctuate due to factors unrelated to the past or present operating performance of such companies. Our market valuation may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

As a result, the value of your investment in us may fluctuate.

We have never paid dividends on our common stock.

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not presently intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Investors should not look to dividends as a source of income. In the interest of reinvesting initial profits back into our business, we do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, any economic return will initially be derived, if at all, from appreciation in the fair market value of our stock, and not as a result of dividend payments.

Insiders have substantial control over us, which could limit your ability to influence the outcome of key transactions, including a change of control.

Two of our directors have perpetual voting rights with respect to all company matters. They may have interests that differ from yours and may vote in a way with which you disagree and which may be adverse to your interests. This concentration of voting power may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change of control of our company, could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of our company and might ultimately affect the market price of our common stock.