Quarterly Report (10-q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10‑Q

☑ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to ___________

Commission File Number : 001-32171


Bimini Capital Management, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland		72-1571637
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3305 Flamingo Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32963

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(772) 231-1400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ý No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer", "smaller reporting company", and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Check one:


Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	☒
		Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ý

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

Title of each Class	Latest Practicable Date	Shares Outstanding
Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value	August 9, 2019	11,608,555
Class B Common Stock, $0.001 par value	August 9, 2019	31,938
Class C Common Stock, $0.001 par value	August 9, 2019	31,938

BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements		1
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)		1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)		2
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited)		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)		4
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		5
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		25
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		48
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures		48

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings		49
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors		49
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		49
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		49
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures		49
ITEM 5. Other Information		49
ITEM 6. Exhibits		50
SIGNATURES		51

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	(Unaudited)
	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
ASSETS:
Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value
Pledged to counterparties	$	211,118,462		$	212,349,874
Unpledged		52,000			74,318
Total mortgage-backed securities		211,170,462			212,424,192
Cash and cash equivalents		5,883,398			4,947,801
Restricted cash		2,656,085			1,292,687
Orchid Island Capital, Inc. common stock, at fair value		9,667,429			9,713,030
Accrued interest receivable		750,193			780,535
Property and equipment, net		3,261,351			3,298,067
Deferred tax assets, at fair value		22,603,791			23,202,821
Other assets		3,768,804			3,740,543
Total Assets	$	259,761,513		$	259,399,676

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

LIABILITIES:
Repurchase agreements	$	200,656,000		$	200,396,000
Junior subordinated notes due to Bimini Capital Trust II		26,804,440			26,804,440
Accrued interest payable		818,485			678,262
Other liabilities		1,412,628			2,566,353
Total Liabilities		229,691,553			230,445,055

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 100,000 shares
designated Series A Junior Preferred Stock, 9,900,000 shares undesignated;
no shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018		-			-
Class A Common stock, $0.001 par value; 98,000,000 shares designated: 12,708,555
shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2019 and 12,709,269 shares issued
and outstanding as of December 31, 2018		12,709			12,709
Class B Common stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares designated, 31,938 shares
issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018		32			32
Class C Common stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares designated, 31,938 shares
issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018		32			32
Additional paid-in capital		334,917,723			334,919,265
Accumulated deficit		(304,860,536	)		(305,977,417	)
Stockholders’ Equity		30,069,960			28,954,621
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	259,761,513		$	259,399,676
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

-1-

BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
For the Six and Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			2019			2018
Revenues:
Advisory services	$	3,261,116		$	4,060,459		$	1,653,796		$	1,966,994
Interest income		4,324,093			4,080,776			2,133,677			2,000,510
Dividend income from Orchid Island Capital, Inc. common stock		729,617			881,621			364,809			410,410
Total revenues		8,314,826			9,022,856			4,152,282			4,377,914
Interest expense
Repurchase agreements		(2,652,893	)		(1,746,554	)		(1,340,029	)		(937,288	)
Junior subordinated notes		(806,147	)		(709,485	)		(399,592	)		(372,152	)
Net revenues		4,855,786			6,566,817			2,412,661			3,068,474

Other expense:
Unrealized gains (losses) on mortgage-backed securities		5,276,251			(6,813,783	)		2,224,016			(1,933,977	)
Realized losses on mortgage-backed securities		-			(103,356	)		-			(103,356	)
Unrealized (losses) gains on Orchid Island Capital, Inc. common stock		(45,601	)		(2,675,263	)		(334,408	)		228,005
(Losses) gains on derivative instruments		(5,621,756	)		2,610,422			(3,364,345	)		869,710
Gains (losses) on retained interests in securitizations		275,115			(251,831	)		-			(169,167	)
Other income		494			915			248			308
Total other expense		(115,497	)		(7,232,896	)		(1,474,489	)		(1,108,477	)

Expenses:
Compensation and related benefits		2,087,625			2,102,531			1,016,844			1,036,076
Directors' fees and liability insurance		321,308			321,225			160,666			160,612
Audit, legal and other professional fees		284,027			298,506			145,395			122,754
Administrative and other expenses		526,029			667,455			275,058			331,295
Total expenses		3,218,989			3,389,717			1,597,963			1,650,737

Net income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)		1,521,300			(4,055,796	)		(659,791	)		309,260
Income tax provision (benefit)		404,419			(1,004,310	)		(158,069	)		86,980

Net income (loss)	$	1,116,881		$	(3,051,486	)	$	(501,722	)	$	222,280

Basic and Diluted Net income (loss) Per Share of:
CLASS A COMMON STOCK
Basic and Diluted	$	0.09		$	(0.24	)	$	(0.04	)	$	0.02
CLASS B COMMON STOCK
Basic and Diluted	$	0.09		$	(0.24	)	$	(0.04	)	$	0.02
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
CLASS A COMMON STOCK
Basic and Diluted		12,708,587			12,729,666			12,708,555			12,770,265
CLASS B COMMON STOCK
Basic and Diluted		31,938			31,938			31,938			31,938
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

-2-

BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Unaudited)
For the Six and Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

	Stockholders' Equity
	Common			Additional			Accumulated
	Stock			Paid-in Capital			Deficit			Total
Balances, January 1, 2018	$	12,725		$	334,878,779		$	(279,199,256	)	$	55,692,248
Net loss		-			-			(3,273,766	)		(3,273,766	)
Class A common shares sold directly to employees		83			199,914			-			199,997
Amortization of stock based compensation		-			2,869			-			2,869
Balances, March 31, 2018	$	12,808		$	335,081,562		$	(282,473,022	)	$	52,621,348
Net income		-			-			222,280			222,280
Class A common shares repurchased and retired		(31	)		(73,316	)		-			(73,347	)
Amortization of stock based compensation		-			2,869			-			2,869
Balances, June 30, 2018	$	12,777		$	335,011,115		$	(282,250,742	)	$	52,773,150

Balances, January 1, 2019	$	12,773		$	334,919,265		$	(305,977,417	)	$	28,954,621
Net income		-			-			1,618,603			1,618,603
Class A common shares repurchased and retired		-			(1,542	)		-			(1,542	)
Balances, March 31, 2019	$	12,773		$	334,917,723		$	(304,358,814	)	$	30,571,682
Net loss		-			-			(501,722	)		(501,722	)
Balances, June 30, 2019	$	12,773		$	334,917,723		$	(304,860,536	)	$	30,069,960
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

-3-

BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

	2019			2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	1,116,881		$	(3,051,486	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Stock based compensation		-			5,738
Depreciation		36,716			38,901
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)		599,030			(809,502	)
(Gains) losses on mortgage-backed securities, net		(5,276,251	)		6,917,139
(Gains) losses on retained interests in securitizations		(275,115	)		251,831
Unrealized losses on Orchid Island Capital, Inc. common stock		45,601			2,675,263
Realized and unrealized losses on forward settling TBA securities		1,801,321			330,078
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable		30,342			75,909
Other assets		(28,261	)		(237,926	)
Accrued interest payable		140,223			(25,584	)
Other liabilities		(395,183	)		(146,735	)
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(2,204,696	)		6,023,626

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
From mortgage-backed securities investments:
Purchases		(3,285,372	)		(5,080,712	)
Sales		-			9,089,456
Principal repayments		9,815,353			14,240,674
Payments received on retained interests in securitizations		-			401,549
Proceeds from termination of retained interests		275,115			-
Purchases of property and equipment		-			(15,392	)
Net settlement of forward settling TBA contracts		(2,559,863	)		13,672
NET CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES		4,245,233			18,649,247

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from repurchase agreements		574,564,000			848,802,237
Principal repayments on repurchase agreements		(574,304,000	)		(873,562,509	)
Class A common shares repurchased and retired		(1,542	)		(73,347	)
Class A common shares sold directly to employees		-			199,997
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES		258,458			(24,633,622	)

NET INCREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH		2,298,995			39,251
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, beginning of the period		6,240,488			8,752,860
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, end of the period	$	8,539,483		$	8,792,111

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest expense	$	3,318,817		$	2,481,623
Income taxes	$	(46,700	)	$	303,458
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

-4-

BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

June 30, 2019

NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business Description

Bimini Capital Management, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Bimini Capital” or the “Company”) formed in September 2003, is a holding company. The Company operates in two business segments through its principal wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, Bimini Advisors Holdings, LLC and Royal Palm Capital, LLC.

Royal Palm Capital, LLC maintains an investment portfolio, consisting primarily of MBS investments, for its own benefit. Royal Palm Capital, LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are collectively referred to as "Royal Palm."

Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bimini Capital, Bimini Advisors and Royal Palm. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated from the consolidated financial statements.

Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”)

Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 810, Consolidation, requires the consolidation of a variable interest entity ("VIE") by an enterprise if it is deemed the primary beneficiary of the VIE. Bimini Capital has a common share investment in a trust used in connection with the issuance of Bimini Capital's junior subordinated notes. See Note 8 for a description of the accounting used for this VIE.

The Company obtains interests in VIEs through its investments in mortgage-backed securities. The interests in these VIEs are passive in nature and are not expected to result in the Company obtaining a controlling financial interest in these VIEs in the future. As a result, the Company does not consolidate these VIEs and accounts for the interest in these VIEs as mortgage-backed securities. See Note 3 for additional information regarding the Company’s investments in mortgage-backed securities. The maximum exposure to loss for these VIEs is the carrying value of the mortgage-backed securities.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they may not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the six and three month periods ended June 30, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2019.

-5-

The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2018 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates affecting the accompanying consolidated financial statements include determining the fair values of MBS, investment in Orchid common shares, derivatives and retained interests, determining the amounts of asset valuation allowances, and the computation of the income tax provision or benefit and the deferred tax asset allowances recorded for each accounting period.

Statement of Comprehensive Income

In accordance with ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income , a statement of comprehensive income has not been included as the Company has no items of other comprehensive income (loss). Comprehensive income (loss) is the same as net income (loss) for all periods presented.

Segment Reporting

The Company’s operations are classified into two principal reportable segments: the asset management segment and the investment portfolio segment. These segments are evaluated by management in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as the Company’s accounting policies with the exception that inter-segment revenues and expenses are included in the presentation of segment results. For further information see Note 15.

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on deposit with financial institutions and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase. Restricted cash includes cash pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements and derivative instruments. The following table presents the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

(in thousands)
	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
Cash and cash equivalents		$	5,883,398		$	4,947,801
Restricted cash			2,656,085			1,292,687
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		$	8,539,483		$	6,240,488

The Company maintains cash balances at several banks and excess margin with an exchange clearing member. At times, balances may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses related to these balances. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insures eligible accounts up to $250,000 per depositor at each financial institution. At June 30, 2019, the Company’s cash deposits exceeded federally insured limits by approximately $4.5 million. The Company also maintains excess margin in accounts with derivative exchanges. Restricted cash balances are uninsured, but are held in separate accounts that are segregated from the general funds of the counterparty. The Company limits uninsured balances to only large, well-known banks and exchange clearing members and believes that it is not exposed to significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents or restricted cash balances.

-6-

Advisory Services

Orchid is externally managed and advised by Bimini Advisors pursuant to the terms of a management agreement. Under the terms of the management agreement, Orchid is obligated to pay Bimini Advisors a monthly management fee and a pro rata portion of certain overhead costs and to reimburse the Company for any direct expenses incurred on its behalf. Revenues from management fees are recognized over the period of time in which the service is performed.

Mortgage-Backed Securities

The Company invests primarily in mortgage pass-through (“PT”) certificates, collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”), and interest-only (“IO”) securities and inverse interest-only (“IIO”) securities representing interest in or obligations backed by pools of mortgage-backed loans. The Company has elected to account for its investment in MBS under the fair value option. Electing the fair value option requires the Company to record changes in fair value in the consolidated statement of operations, which, in management’s view, more appropriately reflects the results of our operations for a particular reporting period and is consistent with the underlying economics and how the portfolio is managed.

The Company records MBS transactions on the trade date. Security purchases that have not settled as of the balance sheet date are included in the MBS balance with an offsetting liability recorded, whereas securities sold that have not settled as of the balance sheet date are removed from the MBS balance with an offsetting receivable recorded.

The fair value of the Company’s investment in MBS is governed by ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement . The definition of fair value in ASC Topic 820 focuses on the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability either occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability, or in the absence of a principal market, occurs in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. Estimated fair values for MBS are based on independent pricing sources and/or third-party broker quotes, when available.

Income on PT MBS is based on the stated interest rate of the security. Premiums or discounts present at the date of purchase are not amortized. Premium lost and discount accretion resulting from monthly principal repayments are reflected in unrealized gains on MBS in the consolidated statements of operations. For IO securities, the income is accrued based on the carrying value and the effective yield. The difference between income accrued and the interest received on the security is characterized as a return of investment and serves to reduce the asset’s carrying value. At each reporting date, the effective yield is adjusted prospectively for future reporting periods based on the new estimate of prepayments and the contractual terms of the security. For IIO securities, effective yield and income recognition calculations also take into account the index value applicable to the security. Changes in fair value of MBS during each reporting period are recorded in earnings and reported as unrealized gains or losses on mortgage-backed securities in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The amount reported as unrealized gains or losses on mortgage backed securities thus captures the net effect of changes in the fair market value of securities caused by market developments and any premium or discount lost as a result of principal repayments during the period.

Orchid Island Capital, Inc. Common Stock

The Company has elected the fair value option for its investment in Orchid common shares. The change in the fair value of this investment and dividends received on this investment are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations. We estimate the fair value of our investment in Orchid on a market approach using “Level 1” inputs based on the quoted market price of Orchid’s common stock on a national stock exchange. Electing the fair value option requires the Company to record changes in fair value in the consolidated statements of operations, which, in management’s view, more appropriately reflects the results of our operations for a particular reporting period and is consistent with how the investment is managed.

-7-

Retained Interests in Securitizations

Retained interests in the subordinated tranches of securities created in securitization transactions were initially recorded at their fair value when issued by Royal Palm. These retained interests currently have a recorded fair value of zero, but may generate cash flows in the future. Any cash received from the retained interests are reflected in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Realized gains and subsequent adjustments to fair value are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses derivative instruments to manage interest rate risk, facilitate asset/liability strategies and manage other exposures, and it may continue to do so in the future. The principal instruments that the Company has used to date are Treasury Note (“T-Note”) and Eurodollar futures contracts, and “to-be-announced” (“TBA”) securities transactions, but it may enter into other derivatives in the future.

The Company accounts for TBA securities as derivative instruments if either the TBA securities do not settle in the shortest period of time possible or if the Company cannot assert that it is probable at inception of the TBA transaction, or throughout its term, that it will take physical delivery of the MBS for a long position, or make delivery of the MBS for a short position, upon settlement of the trade. Gains and losses associated with TBA securities transactions are reported in gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Derivative instruments are carried at fair value, and changes in fair value are recorded in the consolidated operations for each period. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are not designated as hedge accounting relationships, but rather are used as economic hedges of its portfolio assets and liabilities.

Holding derivatives creates exposure to credit risk related to the potential for failure by counterparties to honor their commitments. In addition, the Company may be required to post collateral based on any declines in the market value of the derivatives. In the event of default by a counterparty, the Company may have difficulty recovering its collateral and may not receive payments provided for under the terms of the agreement. To mitigate this risk, the Company uses only well-established commercial banks as counterparties.

Financial Instruments

ASC Topic 825 , Financial Instruments , requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, either in the body of the financial statements or in the accompanying notes. MBS, Orchid common stock and derivative assets and liabilities are accounted for at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets. The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value for these instruments are presented in Note 14 of the consolidated financial statements.

The estimated fair value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accrued interest receivable, other assets, repurchase agreements, accrued interest payable and other liabilities generally approximates their carrying value as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

It is impractical to estimate the fair value of the Company’s junior subordinated notes. Currently, there is a limited market for these types of instruments and the Company is unable to ascertain what interest rates would be available to the Company for similar financial instruments. Further Information regarding these instruments is presented in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.

-8-

Property and Equipment, net

Property and equipment, net, consists of computer equipment with a depreciable life of 3 years, office furniture and equipment with depreciable lives of 8 to 20 years, land which has no depreciable life, and buildings and improvements with depreciable lives of 30 years. Property and equipment is recorded at acquisition cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.

Repurchase Agreements

The Company finances the acquisition of the majority of its PT MBS through the use of repurchase agreements under master repurchase agreements. Pursuant to ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing , the Company accounts for repurchase transactions as collateralized financing transactions, which are carried at their contractual amounts, including accrued interest, as specified in the respective agreements.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation , to account for stock and stock-based awards. For stock and stock-based awards issued to employees, a compensation charge is recorded against earnings over the vesting period based on the fair value of the award. The Company applies a zero forfeiture rate for its equity based awards, as such awards have been granted to a limited number of employees and historical forfeitures have been minimal. A significant forfeiture, or an indication that significant forfeitures may occur, would result in a revised forfeiture rate which would be accounted for prospectively as a change in an estimate. For transactions with non-employees in which services are performed in exchange for the Company’s common stock or other equity instruments, the transactions are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the service received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more readily measurable at the date of the issuance of the common stock.

Earnings Per Share

The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share , which requires companies with complex capital structures, common stock equivalents or two (or more) classes of securities that participate in dividend distributions to present both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the consolidated statement of operations. Basic EPS is calculated as income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is calculated using the treasury stock or two-class method, as applicable for common stock equivalents. However, the common stock equivalents are not included in computing diluted EPS if the result is anti-dilutive.

Outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock, participating and convertible into Class A Common Stock, are entitled to receive dividends in an amount equal to the dividends declared, if any, on each share of Class A Common Stock. Accordingly, shares of the Class B Common Stock are included in the computation of basic EPS using the two-class method and, consequently, are presented separately from Class A Common Stock.

The shares of Class C Common Stock are not included in the basic EPS computation as these shares do not have participation rights. The outstanding shares of Class B and Class C Common Stock are not included in the computation of diluted EPS for the Class A Common Stock as the conditions for conversion into shares of Class A Common Stock were not met.

-9-

Income Taxes

Income taxes are provided for using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. The measurement of net deferred tax assets is adjusted by a valuation allowance if, based on the Company’s evaluation, it is more likely than not that they will not be realized.

The Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns for years ended on or after December 31, 2015 remain open for examination. Although management believes its calculations for tax returns are correct and the positions taken thereon are reasonable, the final outcome of tax audits could be materially different from the tax returns filed by the Company, and those differences could result in significant costs or benefits to the Company. For tax filing purposes, Bimini Capital and Bimini Advisors are consolidated as a single tax paying entity. Royal Palm files as a separate tax paying entity.

The Company measures, recognizes and presents its uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes . Under that guidance, the Company assesses the likelihood, based on their technical merit, that tax positions will be sustained upon examination based on the facts, circumstances and information available at the end of each period. The measurement of uncertain tax positions is adjusted when new information is available, or when an event occurs that requires a change. The Company recognizes tax positions in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authority based on the technical merits of the position. A position that meets this standard is measured at the largest amount of benefit that will more likely than not be realized upon settlement. The difference between the benefit recognized and the tax benefit claimed on a tax return is referred to as an unrecognized tax benefit and is recorded as a liability in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company records income tax-related interest and penalties, if applicable, within the income tax provision.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. ASU 2016-13 requires credit losses on most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments to be measured using an expected credit loss model (referred to as the current expected credit loss (CECL) model). ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application is permitted for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 2. ADVISORY SERVICES

Bimini Advisors serves as the manager and advisor for Orchid pursuant to the terms of a management agreement. As Manager, Bimini Advisors is responsible for administering Orchid's business activities and day-to-day operations. Pursuant to the terms of the management agreement, Bimini Advisors provides Orchid with its management team, including its officers, along with appropriate support personnel. Bimini Advisors is at all times subject to the supervision and oversight of Orchid's board of directors and has only such functions and authority as delegated to it. Bimini Advisors receives a monthly management fee in the amount of:

·	One-twelfth of 1.5% of the first $250 million of Orchid’s month-end equity, as defined in the management agreement,

·	One-twelfth of 1.25% of Orchid’s month-end equity that is greater than $250 million and less than or equal to $500 million, and

·	One-twelfth of 1.00% of Orchid’s month-end equity that is greater than $500 million.

-10-

Orchid is obligated to reimburse Bimini Advisors for any direct expenses incurred on its behalf and to pay to Bimini Advisors an amount equal to Orchid's pro rata portion of certain overhead costs set forth in the management agreement. The management agreement has been renewed through February 20, 2020 and provides for automatic one-year extension options thereafter. Should Orchid terminate the management agreement without cause, it will be obligated to pay to Bimini Advisors a termination fee equal to three times the average annual management fee, as defined in the management agreement, before or on the last day of the current automatic renewal term.

The following table summarizes the advisory services revenue from Orchid for the six and three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 .

(in thousands)
	Six Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
Management fee	$	2,611	$	3,318	$	1,327	$	1,606
Allocated overhead		650		742		327		361
Total	$	3,261	$	4,060	$	1,654	$	1,967

At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the net amount due from Orchid was approximately $0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively. These amounts are included in “other assets” in the consolidated balance sheets.

NOTE 3. MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES

The following table presents the Company’s MBS portfolio as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

(in thousands)
	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Fixed-rate MBS	$	209,080	$	209,675
Interest-Only MBS		1,472		2,021
Inverse Interest-Only MBS		618		728
Total	$	211,170	$	212,424

NOTE 4. REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had outstanding repurchase agreement obligations of approximately $200.7 million with a net weighted average borrowing rate of 2.63%. These agreements were collateralized by MBS with a fair value, including accrued interest, of approximately $211.9 million, and cash pledged to counterparties of approximately $1.9 million. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had outstanding repurchase agreement obligations of approximately $200.4 million with a net weighted average borrowing rate of 2.56%. These agreements were collateralized by MBS with a fair value, including accrued interest, of approximately $213.1 million, and cash pledged to counterparties of approximately $0.2 million.

-11-

As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company’s repurchase agreements had remaining maturities as summarized below:

($ in thousands)
	OVERNIGHT			BETWEEN 2			BETWEEN 31			GREATER
	(1 DAY OR			AND			AND			THAN
	LESS)			30 DAYS			90 DAYS			90 DAYS			TOTAL
June 30, 2019
Fair value of securities pledged, including accrued
interest receivable	$	1,692		$	89,115		$	116,520		$	4,540		$	211,867
Repurchase agreement liabilities associated with
these securities	$	1,146		$	84,967		$	110,355		$	4,188		$	200,656
Net weighted average borrowing rate		2.94	%		2.64	%		2.62	%		2.64	%		2.63	%
December 31, 2018
Fair value of securities pledged, including accrued
interest receivable	$	-		$	107,876		$	105,251		$	-		$	213,127
Repurchase agreement liabilities associated with
these securities	$	-		$	101,327		$	99,069		$	-		$	200,396
Net weighted average borrowing rate		-			2.56	%		2.56	%		-			2.56	%

If, during the term of a repurchase agreement, a lender files for bankruptcy, the Company might experience difficulty recovering its pledged assets , which could result in an unsecured claim against the lender for the difference between the amount loaned to the Company plus interest due to the counterparty and the fair value of the collateral pledged to such lender , including the accrued interest receivable, and cash posted by the Company as collateral, if any. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had an aggregate amount at risk (the difference between the amount loaned to the Company, including interest payable, and the fair value of securities and cash pledged (if any), including accrued interest on such securities) with all counterparties of approximately $12.4 million and $12.4 million, respectively. Summary information regarding amounts at risk with individual counterparties greater than 10% of equity at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 is presented in the table below.

($ in thousands)
			% of			Weighted
			Stockholders'			Average
	Amount		Equity			Maturity
Repurchase Agreement Counterparties	at Risk		at Risk			(in Days)
June 30, 2019
ED&F Man Capital Markets Inc.	$	5,681		18.9	%		29
Mirae Asset Securities (USA) Inc.		3,411		11.3	%		51
December 31, 2018
ED&F Man Capital Markets Inc.	$	4,037		13.9	%		17
Mirae Asset Securities (USA) Inc.		3,506		12.1	%		40

NOTE 5. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In connection with its interest rate risk management strategy, the Company economically hedges a portion of the cost of its repurchase agreement funding and junior subordinated notes by entering into derivatives and other hedging contracts. To date the Company has entered into Eurodollar and T-Note futures contracts, but may enter into other contracts in the future. The Company has not elected hedging treatment under GAAP, and as such all gains or losses (realized and unrealized) on these instruments are reflected in earnings for all periods presented.

In addition, the Company utilizes TBA securities as a means of investing in and financing MBS or as a means of reducing its exposure to MBS. The Company accounts for TBA securities as derivative instruments.

-12-

Derivative Liabilities, at Fair Value

The table below summarizes fair value information about our derivative liabilities as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

(in thousands)
Derivative Instruments and Related Accounts	Balance Sheet Location	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Liabilities
TBA Securities	Other liabilities	$	179	$	938
Total derivative liabilities, at fair value		$	179	$	938

Margin Balances Posted to Counterparties
Futures contracts	Restricted cash	$	685	$	520
TBA securities	Restricted cash		66		543
Total margin balances on derivative contracts		$	751	$	1,063

Eurodollar and T-Note futures are cash settled futures contracts on an interest rate, with gains and losses credited or charged to the Company’s cash accounts on a daily basis. A minimum balance, or “margin”, is required to be maintained in the account on a daily basis. The tables below present information related to the Company’s Eurodollar and T-note futures positions at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

($ in thousands)
As of June 30, 2019
	Repurchase Agreement Funding Hedges
	Average		Weighted			Weighted
	Contract		Average			Average
	Notional		Entry			Effective			Open
Expiration Year	Amount		Rate			Rate			Equity ⁽¹⁾
Eurodollar Futures Contracts (Short Positions)
2019	$	150,000		2.71	%		1.96	%	$	(568	)
2020		150,000		2.84	%		1.61	%		(1,849	)
2021		100,000		2.80	%		1.57	%		(1,231	)
Total / Weighted Average	$	130,000		2.80	%		1.68	%	$	(3,648	)

Treasury Note Futures Contracts (Short Position) ⁽²⁾
September 2019 5-year T-Note futures
(Sep 2019 - Sep 2024 Hedge Period)	$	25,000		2.60	%		2.15	%	$	(581	)

($ in thousands)
As of June 30, 2019
	Junior Subordinated Debt Funding Hedges
	Average		Weighted			Weighted
	Contract		Average			Average
	Notional		Entry			Effective			Open
Expiration Year	Amount		Rate			Rate			Equity ⁽¹⁾
2019	$	26,000		1.72	%		1.96	%	$	31
2020		19,500		1.92	%		1.63	%		(57	)
Total / Weighted Average	$	21,667		1.84	%		1.76	%	$	(26	)

-13-

($ in thousands)
As of December 31, 2018
	Repurchase Agreement Funding Hedges
	Average		Weighted			Weighted
	Contract		Average			Average
	Notional		Entry			Effective			Open
Expiration Year	Amount		Rate			Rate			Equity ⁽¹⁾
2019	$	125,000		2.56	%		2.67	%	$	139
2020		150,000		2.84	%		2.49	%		(523	)
2021		100,000		2.80	%		2.46	%		(346	)
Total / Weighted Average	$	125,000		2.74	%		2.54	%	$	(730	)

($ in thousands)
As of December 31, 2018
	Junior Subordinated Debt Funding Hedges
	Average		Weighted			Weighted
	Contract		Average			Average
	Notional		Entry			Effective			Open
Expiration Year	Amount		Rate			Rate			Equity ⁽¹⁾
2019	$	26,000		1.63	%		2.68	%	$	271
2020		26,000		1.95	%		2.49	%		142
2021		26,000		2.22	%		2.46	%		61
Total / Weighted Average	$	26,000		1.93	%		2.54	%	$	474

(1)	Open equity represents the cumulative gains (losses) recorded on open futures positions from inception.

(2)	T-Note futures contracts were valued at a price of $118.16 at June 30, 2019. The notional contract values of the short positions were $29.5 million.

The following table summarizes our contracts to purchase and sell TBA securities as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

($ in thousands)
			Notional									Net
			Amount			Cost			Market			Carrying
			Long (Short) ⁽¹⁾			Basis ⁽²⁾			Value ⁽³⁾			Value ⁽⁴⁾
June 30, 2019
30-Year TBA Securities:
	3.5	%	$	(65,000	)	$	(66,280	)	$	(66,459	)	$	(179	)
December 31, 2018
30-Year TBA Securities:
	3.0	%	$	(50,000	)	$	(47,844	)	$	(48,782	)	$	(938	)

(1)	Notional amount represents the par value (or principal balance) of the underlying Agency MBS.

(2)	Cost basis represents the forward price to be paid (received) for the underlying Agency MBS.

(3)	Market value represents the current market value of the TBA securities (or of the underlying Agency MBS) as of period-end.

(4)	Net carrying value represents the difference between the market value and the cost basis of the TBA securities as of period-end and is reported in derivative assets (liabilities), at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets.

-14-

(Losses) Gains On Derivative Instruments

The table below presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of operations for the six and three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

(in thousands)
	Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			2019			2018
Eurodollar futures contracts (short positions)
Repurchase agreement funding hedges	$	(2,831	)	$	1,624		$	(1,860	)	$	534
Junior subordinated debt funding hedges		(409	)		557			(189	)		142
T-Note futures contracts (short positions)
Repurchase agreement funding hedges		(581	)		759			(581	)		-
Net TBA securities		(1,801	)		(330	)		(734	)		194
(Losses) gains on derivative instruments	$	(5,622	)	$	2,610		$	(3,364	)	$	870

Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features

The use of derivatives creates exposure to credit risk relating to potential losses that could be recognized in the event that the counterparties to these instruments fail to perform their obligations under the contracts. The Company attempts to minimize this risk in several ways. For instruments which are not centrally cleared on a registered exchange, the Company limits its counterparties to major financial institutions with acceptable credit ratings , and by monitoring positions with individual counterparties. In addition, the Company may be required to pledge assets as collateral for its derivatives, whose amounts vary over time based on the market value, notional amount and remaining term of the derivative contract. In the event of a default by a counterparty, the Company may not receive payments provided for under the terms of its derivative agreements, and may have difficulty recovering its assets pledged as collateral for its derivatives. The cash and cash equivalents pledged as collateral for the Company’s derivative instruments are included in restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheets.

NOTE 6. PLEDGED ASSETS

Assets Pledged to Counterparties

The table below summarizes Bimini’s assets pledged as collateral under its repurchase agreements and derivative agreements as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

($ in thousands)
	June 30, 2019						December 31, 2018
	Repurchase		Derivative				Repurchase		Derivative
Assets Pledged to Counterparties	Agreements		Agreements		Total		Agreements		Agreements		Total
PT MBS - at fair value	$	209,078	$	-	$	209,078	$	209,675	$	-	$	209,675
Structured MBS - at fair value		2,040		-		2,040		2,675		-		2,675
Accrued interest on pledged securities		748		-		748		777		-		777
Restricted cash		1,905		751		2,656		230		1,063		1,293
Total	$	213,771	$	751	$	214,522	$	213,357	$	1,063	$	214,420

-15-

Assets Pledged from Counterparties

The table below summarizes assets pledged to Bimini from counterparties under repurchase agreements as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Cash received as margin is recognized in cash and cash equivalents with a corresponding amount recognized as an increase in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

($ in thousands)
Assets Pledged to Bimini	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Cash	$	21	$	371
Total	$	21	$	371

NOTE 7. OFFSETTING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The Company’s derivatives and repurchase agreements are subject to underlying agreements with master netting or similar arrangements, which provide for the right of offset in the event of default or in the event of bankruptcy of either party to the transactions. The Company reports its assets and liabilities subject to these arrangements on a gross basis. The following tables present information regarding those assets and liabilities subject to such arrangements as if the Company had presented them on a net basis as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

(in thousands)
Offsetting of Liabilities
										Gross Amount Not Offset in the
							Net Amount			Consolidated Balance Sheet
				Gross Amount			of Liabilities			Financial
	Gross Amount			Offset in the			Presented in the			Instruments				Cash
	of Recognized			Consolidated			Consolidated			Posted as				Posted as				Net
	Liabilities			Balance Sheet			Balance Sheet			Collateral				Collateral				Amount
June 30, 2019
Repurchase Agreements		$	200,656		$	-		$	200,656		$	(198,751	)		$	(1,905	)		$	-
TBA securities			179			-			179			-				(66	)			113
		$	200,835		$	-		$	200,835		$	(198,751	)		$	(1,971	)		$	113
December 31, 2018
Repurchase Agreements		$	200,396		$	-		$	200,396		$	(200,166	)		$	(230	)		$	-
TBA securities			938			-			938			-				(543	)			395
		$	201,334		$	-		$	201,334		$	(200,166	)		$	(773	)		$	395

The amounts disclosed for collateral received by or posted to the same counterparty are limited to the amount sufficient to reduce the asset or liability presented in the consolidated balance sheet to zero in accordance with ASC 210-20-50. The fair value of the actual collateral received by or posted to the same counterparty typically exceeds the amounts presented. See Note 6 for a discussion of collateral posted for, or received against, repurchase obligations and derivative instruments.

NOTE 8. TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES

During 2005, Bimini Capital sponsored the formation of a statutory trust, known as Bimini Capital Trust II (“BCTII”) of which 100% of the common equity is owned by Bimini Capital. It was formed for the purpose of issuing trust preferred capital securities to third-party investors and investing the proceeds from the sale of such capital securities solely in junior subordinated debt securities of Bimini Capital. The debt securities held by BCTII are the sole assets of BCTII.

-16-

As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the outstanding principal balance on the junior subordinated debt securities owed to BCTII was $26.8 million. The BCTII trust preferred securities and Bimini Capital's BCTII Junior Subordinated Notes have a rate of interest that floats at a spread of 3.50% over the prevailing three-month LIBOR rate. As of June 30, 2019, the interest rate was 5.91%. The BCTII trust preferred securities and Bimini Capital's BCTII Junior Subordinated Notes require quarterly interest distributions and are redeemable at Bimini Capital's option, in whole or in part and without penalty. Bimini Capital's BCTII Junior Subordinated Notes are subordinate and junior in right of payment to all present and future senior indebtedness.

BCTII is a VIE because the holders of the equity investment at risk do not have substantive decision making ability over BCTII’s activities. Since Bimini Capital's investment in BCTII’s common equity securities was financed directly by BCTII as a result of its loan of the proceeds to Bimini Capital, that investment is not considered to be an equity investment at risk. Since Bimini Capital's common share investment in BCTII is not a variable interest, Bimini Capital is not the primary beneficiary of BCTII. Therefore, Bimini Capital has not consolidated the financial statements of BCTII into its consolidated financial statements, and this investment is accounted for on the equity method.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements present Bimini Capital's BCTII Junior Subordinated Notes issued to BCTII as a liability and Bimini Capital's investment in the common equity securities of BCTII as an asset (included in other assets). For financial statement purposes, Bimini Capital records payments of interest on the Junior Subordinated Notes issued to BCTII as interest expense.

NOTE 9. COMMON STOCK

The table below presents information related to Bimini Capital’s Class A Common Stock issued during the six and three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

	Six Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,
Shares Issued Related To:	2019		2018		2019		2018
Shares sold directly to employees		-		83,332		-		-
Total shares of Class A Common Stock issued		-		83,332		-		-

There were no issuances of Bimini Capital's Class B Common Stock and Class C Common Stock during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

Stock Repurchase Plan

On March 26, 2018, the Board of Directors of Bimini Capital Management, Inc. (the “Company”) approved a Stock Repurchase Plan (“Repurchase Plan”). Pursuant to Repurchase Plan, the Company may purchase up to 500,000 shares of its Class A Common Stock from time to time, subject to certain limitations imposed by Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Share repurchases may be executed through various means, including, without limitation, open market transactions. The Repurchase Plan does not obligate the Company to purchase any shares. The Repurchase Plan was originally set to expire on November 15, 2018, but it was extended by the Board of Directors until November 15, 2019. The authorization for the Share Repurchase Plan may be terminated, increased or decreased by the Company’s Board of Directors in its discretion at any time.

From the inception of the Repurchase Plan through June 30, 2019, the Company repurchased a total of 70,404 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $166,945, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $2.37 per share.

Tender Offer

In July 2019, the Company completed a “modified Dutch auction” tender offer and paid an aggregate of $2.2 million, excluding fees and related expenses, to repurchase 1.1 million shares of Bimini Capital’s Class A common stock, which were retired, at a price of $2.00 per share. The financial statement impact of the completion of this tender offer will be reported in our September 30, 2019 quarterly results.

-17-

NOTE 10. STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS

On August 12, 2011, Bimini Capital’s shareholders approved the 2011 Long Term Compensation Plan (the “2011 Plan”) to assist the Company in recruiting and retaining employees, directors and other service providers by enabling them to participate in the success of Bimini Capital and to associate their interests with those of the Company and its stockholders. The 2011 Plan is intended to permit the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), stock awards, performance units and other equity-based and incentive awards. The maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2011 Plan pursuant to the exercise of options and SARs, the grant of stock awards or other equity-based awards and the settlement of incentive awards and performance units is equal to 4,000,000 shares.

Performance Units

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Bimini Capital (the "Committee") has issued, and may in the future issue additional, Performance Units under the 2011 Plan to certain officers and employees. “Performance Units” represent the participant’s right to receive an amount, based on the value of a specified number of shares of common stock, if the terms and conditions prescribed by the Committee are satisfied. The Committee will determine the requirements that must be satisfied before Performance Units are earned, including but not limited to any applicable performance period and performance goals. Performance goals may relate to the Company’s financial performance or the participant’s performance or such other criteria determined by the Committee, including goals stated with reference to the performance measures discussed below. If Performance Units are earned, they will be settled in cash, shares of common stock or a combination thereof.

The following table presents the activity related to Performance Units during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:

($ in thousands, except per share data)
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019					2018
			Weighted					Weighted
			Average					Average
			Grant Date					Grant Date
			Fair Value					Fair Value
	Shares		Per Share		Shares			Per Share
Unvested, beginning of period		-	$	-			41,000	$	0.84
Granted		-		-			-		-
Vested and issued		-		-			-		-
Unvested, end of period		-	$	-			41,000	$	0.84

Compensation expense during the period			$	-				$	6
Unrecognized compensation expense at period end			$	-				$	5
Weighted-average remaining vesting term (in years)				-					0.5
Intrinsic value of unvested shares at period end			$	-				$	97

NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

From time to time, the Company may become involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Management is not aware of any significant reported or unreported contingencies at June 30, 2019.

-18-

NOTE 12. INCOME TAXES

The total income tax provision (benefit) recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $0.4 million and $(1.0) million, respectively, on consolidated pre-tax book income (loss) of $1.5 million and $(4.1) million in the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The total income tax provision (benefit) recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $(0.2) million and $0.1 million, respectively, on consolidated pre-tax book income (loss) of $(0.7) million and $0.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The Company’s tax provision is based on a projected effective rate based on annualized amounts applied to actual income to date and includes the expected realization of a portion of the tax benefits of federal and state net operating losses carryforwards (“NOLs”). In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of capital loss and NOL carryforwards is dependent upon the generation of future capital gains and taxable income in periods prior to their expiration. The Company currently provides a valuation allowance against a portion of the NOLs since the Company believes that it is more likely than not that some of the benefits will not be realized in the future. The Company will continue to assess the need for a valuation allowance at each reporting date.

NOTE 13. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Shares of Class B common stock, participating and convertible into Class A common stock, are entitled to receive dividends in an amount equal to the dividends declared on each share of Class A common stock if, and when, authorized and declared by the Board of Directors. Following the provisions of FASB ASC 260, the Class B common stock is included in the computation of basic EPS using the two-class method, and consequently is presented separately from Class A common stock. Shares of Class B common stock are not included in the computation of diluted Class A EPS as the conditions for conversion to Class A common stock were not met at June 30, 2019 and 2018.

Shares of Class C common stock are not included in the basic EPS computation as these shares do not have participation rights. Shares of Class C common stock are not included in the computation of diluted Class A EPS as the conditions for conversion to Class A common stock were not met at June 30, 2019 and 2018.

The Company has dividend eligible stock incentive plan shares that were outstanding during the six and three months ended June 30, 2018. The basic and diluted per share computations include these unvested incentive plan shares if there is income available to Class A common stock, as they have dividend participation rights. The stock incentive plan shares have no contractual obligation to share in losses. Because there is no such obligation, the incentive plan shares are not included in the basic and diluted EPS computations when no income is available to Class A common stock even though they are considered participating securities.

-19-

The table below reconciles the numerator and denominator of EPS for the six and three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

(in thousands, except per-share information)
	Six Months Ended June 30,					Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018			2019			2018
Basic and diluted EPS per Class A common share:
Income (loss) attributable to Class A common shares:
Basic and diluted	$	1,114	$	(3,043	)	$	(501	)	$	221
Weighted average common shares:
Class A common shares outstanding at the balance sheet date		12,709		12,713			12,709			12,713
Unvested dividend-eligible stock incentive plan shares
outstanding at the balance sheet date		-		-			-			41
Effect of weighting		-		17			-			16
Weighted average shares-basic and diluted		12,709		12,730			12,709			12,770
Income (loss) per Class A common share:
Basic and diluted	$	0.09	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.04	)	$	0.02

(in thousands, except per-share information)
	Six Months Ended June 30,					Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018			2019			2018
Basic and diluted EPS per Class B common share:
Income (loss) attributable to Class B common shares:
Basic and diluted	$	3	$	(8	)	$	(1	)	$	1
Weighted average common shares:
Class B common shares outstanding at the balance sheet date		32		32			32			32
Weighted average shares-basic and diluted		32		32			32			32
Income (loss) per Class B common share:
Basic and diluted	$	0.09	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.04	)	$	0.02

NOTE 14. FAIR VALUE

Authoritative accounting literature establishes a framework for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities and defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price). A fair value measure should reflect the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including the assumptions about the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique, the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset and the risk of non-performance. Required disclosures include stratification of balance sheet amounts measured at fair value based on inputs the Company uses to derive fair value measurements. These stratifications are:

·	Level 1 valuations, where the valuation is based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets (which include exchanges and over-the-counter markets with sufficient volume),

Level 2 valuations, where the valuation is based on quoted market prices for similar instruments traded in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market, and

Level 3 valuations, where the valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market, but observable based on Company-specific data. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s own estimates for assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques typically include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, but may also include the use of market prices of assets or liabilities that are not directly comparable to the subject asset or liability.

-20-

MBS, Orchid common stock, retained interests and TBA securities were all recorded at fair value on a recurring basis during the six and three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. When determining fair value measurements, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset. When possible, the Company looks to active and observable markets to price identical assets. When identical assets are not traded in active markets, the Company looks to market observable data for similar assets. Fair value measurements for the retained interests are generated by a model that requires management to make a significant number of assumptions, and this model resulted in a value of zero at both June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

The Company's MBS and TBA securities are valued using Level 2 valuations, and such valuations currently are determined by the Company based on independent pricing sources and/or third party broker quotes, when available. Because the price estimates may vary, the Company must make certain judgments and assumptions about the appropriate price to use to calculate the fair values. The Company and the independent pricing sources use various valuation techniques to determine the price of the Company’s securities. These techniques include observing the most recent market for like or identical assets, spread pricing techniques (option adjusted spread, zero volatility spread, spread to the U.S. Treasury curve or spread to a benchmark such as a TBA security), and model driven approaches (the discounted cash flow method, Black Scholes and SABR models which rely upon observable market rates such as the term structure of interest rates and volatility). The appropriate spread pricing method used is based on market convention. The pricing source determines the spread of recently observed trade activity or observable markets for assets similar to those being priced. The spread is then adjusted based on variances in certain characteristics between the market observation and the asset being priced. Those characteristics include: type of asset, the expected life of the asset, the stability and predictability of the expected future cash flows of the asset, whether the coupon of the asset is fixed or adjustable, the guarantor of the security if applicable, the coupon, the maturity, the issuer, size of the underlying loans, year in which the underlying loans were originated, loan to value ratio, state in which the underlying loans reside, credit score of the underlying borrowers and other variables if appropriate. The fair value of the security is determined by using the adjusted spread.

The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

(in thousands)
				Quoted Prices
				in Active		Significant
				Markets for		Other			Significant
				Identical		Observable			Unobservable
	Fair Value			Assets		Inputs			Inputs
	Measurements			(Level 1)		(Level 2)			(Level 3)
June 30, 2019
Mortgage-backed securities	$	211,170		$	-	$	211,170		$	-
Orchid Island Capital, Inc. common stock		9,667			9,667		-			-
TBA securities		(179	)		-		(179	)		-
December 31, 2018
Mortgage-backed securities	$	212,424		$	-	$	212,424		$	-
Orchid Island Capital, Inc. common stock		9,713			9,713		-			-
TBA securities		(938	)		-		(938	)		-

-21-

The following table illustrates a roll forward for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:

(in thousands)
	Retained Interests in Securitizations
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018
Balances, January 1	$	-		$	653
Gain (loss) included in earnings		275			(252	)
Collections		(275	)		(401	)
Balances, June 30	$	-		$	-

During the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, there were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities between levels 1, 2 or 3.

NOTE 15. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company’s operations are classified into two principal reportable segments: the asset management segment and the investment portfolio segment.

The asset management segment includes the investment advisory services provided by Bimini Advisors to Orchid and Royal Palm. As discussed in Note 2, the revenues of the asset management segment consist of management fees and overhead reimbursements received pursuant to a management agreement with Orchid. Total revenues received under this management agreement for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, were approximately $3.3 million and $4.1 million, respectively, accounting for approximately 39% and 45% of consolidated revenues, respectively.

The investment portfolio segment includes the investment activities conducted by Royal Palm. The investment portfolio segment receives revenue in the form of interest and dividend income on its investments.

Segment information for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 is as follows:

(in thousands)
	Asset			Investment
	Management			Portfolio			Corporate			Eliminations			Total
2019
Advisory services, external customers	$	3,261		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	3,261
Advisory services, other operating segments ⁽¹⁾		137			-			-			(137	)		-
Interest and dividend income		-			5,053			1			-			5,054
Interest expense		-			(2,653	)		(806	) ⁽²⁾		-			(3,459	)
Net revenues		3,398			2,400			(805	)		(137	)		4,856
Other		-			18			(134	) ⁽³⁾		-			(116	)
Operating expenses ⁽⁴⁾		(1,272	)		(1,947	)		-			-			(3,219	)
Intercompany expenses ⁽¹⁾		-			(137	)		-			137			-
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	2,126		$	334		$	(939	)	$	-		$	1,521

-22-


	Asset			Investment
	Management			Portfolio			Corporate			Eliminations			Total
2018
Advisory services, external customers	$	4,060		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	4,060
Advisory services, other operating segments ⁽¹⁾		120			-			-			(120	)		-
Interest and dividend income		-			4,962			-			-			4,962
Interest expense		-			(1,746	)		(709	) ⁽²⁾		-			(2,455	)
Net revenues		4,180			3,216			(709	)		(120	)		6,567
Other		-			(7,539	)		306	⁽³⁾		-			(7,233	)
Operating expenses ⁽⁴⁾		(1,498	)		(1,892	)		-			-			(3,390	)
Intercompany expenses ⁽¹⁾		-			(120	)		-			120			-
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	2,682		$	(6,335	)	$	(403	)	$	-		$	(4,056	)

(1)	Includes fees paid by Royal Palm to Bimini Advisors for advisory services.

(2)	Includes interest on junior subordinated note.

(3)	Includes gains (losses) on Eurodollar futures contracts entered into as a hedge on junior subordinated notes and fair value adjustments on retained interests in securitizations.

(4)	Corporate expenses are allocated based on each segment’s proportional share of total revenues.

Assets in each reportable segment as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were as follows:

(in thousands)
	Asset			Investment
	Management			Portfolio			Corporate			Total
June 30, 2019		$	1,476		$	245,693		$	12,593		$	259,762
December 31, 2018			1,488			245,866			12,046			259,400

NOTE 16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Relationships with Orchid

At both June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company owned 1,520,036 shares of Orchid common stock, representing approximately 2.8% and 3.1% of Orchid’s outstanding common stock on such dates. The Company received dividends on this common stock investment of approximately $0.7 million and $0.4 million during the six and three months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, and approximately $0.9 million and $0.4 million during the six and three months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.

Robert Cauley, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, also serves as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Orchid, receives compensation from Orchid, and owns shares of common stock of Orchid. In addition, Hunter Haas, the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer of the Company, also serves as Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Secretary of Orchid, is a member of Orchid’s Board of Directors, receives compensation from Orchid, and owns shares of common stock of Orchid. Robert J. Dwyer and Frank E. Jaumot, our independent directors, each own shares of common stock of Orchid.

-23-

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to those statements included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. The discussion may contain certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are those that are not historical in nature. As a result of many factors, such as those set forth under “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and any subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements.

Overview

Bimini Capital Management, Inc. ("Bimini Capital" or the "Company") is a holding company that was formed in September 2003. The Company’s principal wholly-owned operating subsidiaries are Bimini Advisors Holdings, LLC and Royal Palm Capital, LLC. We operate in two business segments: the asset management segment, which includes the investment advisory services provided by Bimini Advisors to Orchid, and the investment portfolio segment, which includes the investment activities conducted by Bimini Capital and Royal Palm.

Bimini Advisors Holdings, LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Bimini Advisors, LLC (an investment advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission), are collectively referred to as “Bimini Advisors.” Bimini Advisors serves as the external manager of the portfolio of Orchid Island Capital, Inc. ("Orchid"). From this arrangement, the Company receives management fees and expense reimbursements. As manager, Bimini Advisors is responsible for administering Orchid's business activities and day-to-day operations. Pursuant to the terms of the management agreement, Bimini Advisors provides Orchid with its management team, including its officers, along with appropriate support personnel. Bimini Advisors is at all times subject to the supervision and oversight of Orchid's board of directors and has only such functions and authority as delegated to it. In addition, the Company receives dividends from its investment in Orchid common shares.

Royal Palm Capital, LLC (collectively with its wholly-owned subsidiaries referred to as “Royal Palm”) maintains an investment portfolio, consisting primarily of residential mortgage-backed securities ("MBS") issued and guaranteed by a federally chartered corporation or agency ("Agency MBS"). Our investment strategy focuses on, and our portfolio consists of, two categories of Agency MBS: (i) traditional pass-through Agency MBS ("PT MBS") and (ii) structured Agency MBS, such as collateralized mortgage obligations ("CMOs"), interest only securities ("IOs"), inverse interest only securities ("IIOs") and principal only securities ("POs"), among other types of structured Agency MBS.

Stock Repurchase Plan

On March 26, 2018, the Board of Directors of the “Company approved a Stock Repurchase Plan (“Repurchase Plan”). Pursuant to Repurchase Plan, we may purchase up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock from time to time, subject to certain limitations imposed by Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Share repurchases may be executed through various means, including, without limitation, open market transactions. The Repurchase Plan does not obligate the Company to purchase any shares. The Repurchase Plan was originally set to expire on November 15, 2018, but it was extended by the Board of Directors until November 15, 2019. The authorization for the Share Repurchase Plan may be terminated, increased or decreased by the Company’s Board of Directors in its discretion at any time.

Through June 30, 2019, we repurchased a total of 70,404 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $166,945, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $2.37 per share.

-24-

Tender Offer

Factors that Affect our Results of Operations and Financial Condition

A variety of industry and economic factors may impact our results of operations and financial condition. These factors include:

•

interest rate trends;

•

the difference between Agency MBS yields and our funding and hedging costs;

•

competition for, and supply of, investments in Agency MBS;

•

actions taken by the U.S. government, including the presidential administration, the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”), the Federal Open Market Committee (the “FOMC”) and the U.S. Treasury;

•

prepayment rates on mortgages underlying our Agency MBS, and credit trends insofar as they affect prepayment rates; and

•

the equity markets and the ability of Orchid to raise additional capital; and

•

other market developments.

In addition, a variety of factors relating to our business may also impact our results of operations and financial condition. These factors include:

•

our degree of leverage;

•

our access to funding and borrowing capacity;

•

our borrowing costs;

•

our hedging activities;

•

the market value of our investments;

•

the requirements to qualify for a registration exemption under the Investment Company Act;

•

our ability to use net operating loss carryforwards and net capital loss carryforwards to reduce our taxable income;

•

the impact of possible future changes in tax laws; and

•

our ability to manage the portfolio of Orchid and maintain our role as manager.

Results of Operations

Described below are the Company’s results of operations for the six and three months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to the six and three months ended June 30, 2018.

Net Income (Loss) Summary

Consolidated net income for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $1.1 million, or $0.09 basic and diluted income per share of Class A Common Stock, as compared to consolidated net loss of $3.1 million, or $0.24 basic and diluted loss per share of Class A Common Stock, for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Consolidated net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was $0.5 million, or $0.04 basic and diluted loss per share of Class A Common Stock, as compared to consolidated net income of $0.2 million, or $0.02 basic and diluted income per share of Class A Common Stock, for the three months ended June 30, 2018.

-25-

The components of net income (loss) for the six and three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, along with the changes in those components are presented in the table below:

(in thousands)
	Six Months Ended June 30,									Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			Change			2019			2018			Change
Advisory services revenues	$	3,261		$	4,060		$	(799	)	$	1,654		$	1,967		$	(313	)
Interest and dividend income		5,054			4,962			92			2,498			2,411			87
Interest expense		(3,459	)		(2,455	)		(1,004	)		(1,740	)		(1,310	)		(430	)
Net revenues		4,856			6,567			(1,711	)		2,412			3,068			(656	)
Other expense		(116	)		(7,233	)		7,117			(1,474	)		(1,108	)		(366	)
Expenses		(3,219	)		(3,390	)		171			(1,598	)		(1,651	)		53
Net income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)		1,521			(4,056	)		5,577			(660	)		309			(969	)
Income tax provision (benefit)		404			(1,005	)		1,409			(158	)		87			(245	)
Net income (loss)	$	1,117		$	(3,051	)	$	4,168		$	(502	)	$	222		$	(724	)

GAAP and Non-GAAP Reconciliation

Economic Interest Expense and Economic Net Interest Income

We use derivative instruments, specifically Eurodollar and Treasury Note (“T-Note”) futures contracts and TBA short positions to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk on repurchase agreements in a rising rate environment.

We have not designated our derivative financial instruments as hedge accounting relationships, but rather hold them for economic hedging purposes. Changes in fair value of these instruments are presented in a separate line item in our consolidated statements of operations and not included in interest expense. As such, for financial reporting purposes, interest expense and cost of funds are not impacted by the fluctuation in value of the derivative instruments.

For the purpose of computing economic net interest income and ratios relating to cost of funds measures, GAAP interest expense has been adjusted to reflect the realized and unrealized gains or losses on certain derivative instruments the Company uses that pertain to each period presented. We believe that adjusting our interest expense for the periods presented by the gains or losses on these derivative instruments would not accurately reflect our economic interest expense for these periods. The reason is that these derivative instruments may cover periods that extend into the future, not just the current period. Any realized or unrealized gains or losses on the instruments reflect the change in market value of the instrument caused by changes in underlying interest rates applicable to the term covered by the instrument, not just the current period.

For each period presented, we have combined the effects of the derivative financial instruments in place for the respective period with the actual interest expense incurred on borrowings to reflect total economic interest expense for the applicable period. Interest expense, including the effect of derivative instruments for the period, is referred to as economic interest expense. Net interest income, when calculated to include the effect of derivative instruments for the period, is referred to as economic net interest income. This presentation includes gains or losses on all contracts in effect during the reporting period, covering the current period as well as periods in the future.

We believe that economic interest expense and economic net interest income provide meaningful information to consider, in addition to the respective amounts prepared in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP measures help management to evaluate its financial position and performance without the effects of certain transactions and GAAP adjustments that are not necessarily indicative of our current investment portfolio or operations. The unrealized gains or losses on derivative instruments presented in our consolidated statements of operations are not necessarily representative of the total interest rate expense that we will ultimately realize. This is because as interest rates move up or down in the future, the gains or losses we ultimately realize, and which will affect our total interest rate expense in future periods, may differ from the unrealized gains or losses recognized as of the reporting date.

-26-

Our presentation of the economic value of our hedging strategy has important limitations. First, other market participants may calculate economic interest expense and economic net interest income differently than the way we calculate them. Second, while we believe that the calculation of the economic value of our hedging strategy described above helps to present our financial position and performance, it may be of limited usefulness as an analytical tool. Therefore, the economic value of our investment strategy should not be viewed in isolation and is not a substitute for interest expense and net interest income computed in accordance with GAAP.

The tables below present a reconciliation of the adjustments to interest expense shown for each period relative to our derivative instruments, and the consolidated statements of operations line item, gains (losses) on derivative instruments, calculated in accordance with GAAP for each quarter in 2019 and 2018.

Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments - Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Operations (GAAP)
(in thousands)
	Recognized in
	Statement of			TBA						Junior
	Operations			Securities			Repurchase			Subordinated
Three Months Ended	(GAAP)			Income (Loss)			Agreements			Debt
June 30, 2019	$	(3,364	)	$	(734	)	$	(2,441	)	$	(189	)
March 31, 2019		(2,257	)		(1,068	)		(969	)		(220	)
December 31, 2018		(3,835	)		(1,214	)		(2,184	)		(437	)
September 30, 2018		948			349			478			121
June 30, 2018		870			194			534			142
March 31, 2018		1,741			(523	)		1,849			415

(in thousands)
	Recognized in
	Statement of			TBA						Junior
	Operations			Securities			Repurchase			Subordinated
Six Months Ended	(GAAP)			Income (Loss)			Agreements			Debt
June 30, 2019	$	(5,622	)	$	(1,801	)	$	(3,412	)	$	(409	)
June 30, 2018		2,610			(330	)		2,383			557

Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments - Attributed to Current Period (Non-GAAP)
(in thousands)
	Attributed to Current Period (Non-GAAP)									Attributed to Future Periods (Non-GAAP)
				Junior									Junior
	Repurchase			Subordinated						Repurchase			Subordinated
Three Months Ended	Agreements			Debt			Total			Agreements			Debt			Total
June 30, 2019	$	(226	)	$	43		$	(183	)	$	(2,215	)	$	(232	)	$	(2,447	)
March 31, 2019		5			65			70			(974	)		(285	)		(1,259	)
December 31, 2018		134			68			202			(2,318	)		(505	)		(2,823	)
September 30, 2018		(35	)		11			(24	)		513			110			623
June 30, 2018		(108	)		(19	)		(127	)		642			161			803
March 31, 2018		(154	)		(33	)		(187	)		2,003			448			2,451

-27-

(in thousands)
				Junior									Junior
	Repurchase			Subordinated						Repurchase			Subordinated
Six Months Ended	Agreements			Debt			Total			Agreements			Debt			Total
June 30, 2019	$	(221	)	$	108		$	(113	)	$	(3,191	)	$	(517	)	$	(3,708	)
June 30, 2018		(262	)		(52	)		(314	)		2,645			609			3,254

Economic Net Portfolio Interest Income
(in thousands)
			Interest Expense on Repurchase Agreements							Net Portfolio
					Effect of					Interest Income
	Interest		GAAP		Non-GAAP			Economic		GAAP		Economic
Three Months Ended	Income		Basis		Hedges ⁽¹⁾			Basis ⁽²⁾		Basis		Basis ⁽³⁾
June 30, 2019	$	2,134	$	1,340	$	(226	)	$	1,566	$	794	$	568
March 31, 2019		2,190		1,313		5			1,308		877		882
December 31, 2018		2,227		1,235		134			1,101		992		1,126
September 30, 2018		2,054		1,049		(35	)		1,084		1,005		970
June 30, 2018		2,001		938		(108	)		1,046		1,063		955
March 31, 2018		2,080		808		(154	)		962		1,272		1,118

(in thousands)
			Interest Expense on Repurchase Agreements							Net Portfolio
					Effect of					Interest Income
	Interest		GAAP		Non-GAAP			Economic		GAAP		Economic
Six Months Ended	Income		Basis		Hedges ⁽¹⁾			Basis ⁽²⁾		Basis		Basis ⁽³⁾
June 30, 2019	$	4,324	$	2,653	$	(221	)	$	2,874	$	1,671	$	1,450
June 30, 2018		4,081		1,746		(262	)		2,008		2,335		2,073

(1)	Reflects the effect of derivative instrument hedges for only the period presented.

(2)	Calculated by subtracting the effect of derivative instrument hedges attributed to the period presented from GAAP interest expense.

(3)	Calculated by adding the effect of derivative instrument hedges attributed to the period presented to GAAP net portfolio interest income.

Economic Net Interest Income
(in thousands)
	Net Portfolio				Interest Expense on Junior Subordinated Notes
	Interest Income						Effect of					Net Interest Income
	GAAP		Economic		GAAP		Non-GAAP			Economic		GAAP		Economic
Three Months Ended	Basis		Basis ⁽¹⁾		Basis		Hedges ⁽²⁾			Basis ⁽³⁾		Basis		Basis ⁽⁴⁾
June 30, 2019	$	794	$	568	$	400	$	43		$	357	$	394	$	211
March 31, 2019		877		882		406		65			341		471		541
December 31, 2018		992		1,126		393		68			325		599		801
September 30, 2018		1,005		970		388		11			377		617		593
June 30, 2018		1,063		955		372		(19	)		391		691		564
March 31, 2018		1,272		1,118		337		(33	)		370		935		748

-28-

(in thousands)
	Net Portfolio				Interest Expense on Junior Subordinated Notes
	Interest Income						Effect of					Net Interest Income
	GAAP		Economic		GAAP		Non-GAAP			Economic		GAAP		Economic
Six Months Ended	Basis		Basis ⁽¹⁾		Basis		Hedges ⁽²⁾			Basis ⁽³⁾		Basis		Basis ⁽⁴⁾
June 30, 2019	$	1,671	$	1,450	$	806	$	108		$	698	$	865	$	752
June 30, 2018		2,335		2,073		709		(52	)		761		1,626		1,312

(1)	Calculated by adding the effect of derivative instrument hedges attributed to the period presented to GAAP net portfolio interest income.

(2)	Reflects the effect of derivative instrument hedges for only the period presented.

(3)	Calculated by subtracting the effect of derivative instrument hedges attributed to the period presented from GAAP interest expense.

(4)	Calculated by adding the effect of derivative instrument hedges attributed to the period presented to GAAP net interest income.

Segment Information

We have two operating segments. The asset management segment includes the investment advisory services provided by Bimini Advisors to Orchid and Royal Palm. The investment portfolio segment includes the investment activities conducted by Royal Palm. Segment information for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 is as follows:

(in thousands)
	Asset			Investment
	Management			Portfolio			Corporate			Eliminations			Total
2019
Advisory services, external customers	$	3,261		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	3,261
Advisory services, other operating segments ⁽¹⁾		137			-			-			(137	)		-
Interest and dividend income		-			5,053			1			-			5,054
Interest expense		-			(2,653	)		(806	) ⁽²⁾		-			(3,459	)
Net revenues		3,398			2,400			(805	)		(137	)		4,856
Other		-			18			(134	) ⁽³⁾		-			(116	)
Operating expenses ⁽⁴⁾		(1,272	)		(1,947	)		-			-			(3,219	)
Intercompany expenses ⁽¹⁾		-			(137	)		-			137			-
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	2,126		$	334		$	(939	)	$	-		$	1,521


	Asset			Investment
	Management			Portfolio			Corporate			Eliminations			Total
2018
Advisory services, external customers	$	4,060		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	4,060
Advisory services, other operating segments ⁽¹⁾		120			-			-			(120	)		-
Interest and dividend income		-			4,962			-			-			4,962
Interest expense		-			(1,746	)		(709	) ⁽²⁾		-			(2,455	)
Net revenues		4,180			3,216			(709	)		(120	)		6,567
Other		-			(7,539	)		306	⁽³⁾		-			(7,233	)
Operating expenses ⁽⁴⁾		(1,498	)		(1,892	)		-			-			(3,390	)
Intercompany expenses ⁽¹⁾		-			(120	)		-			120			-
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	2,682		$	(6,335	)	$	(403	)	$	-		$	(4,056	)

(1)	Includes advisory services revenue received by Bimini Advisors from Royal Palm.

(2)	Includes interest on junior subordinated note.

(3)	Includes gains (losses) on Eurodollar futures contracts entered into as a hedge on junior subordinated notes and fair value adjustments on retained interests in securitizations.

(4)	Corporate expenses are allocated based on each segment’s proportional share of total revenues.

-29-

Assets in each reportable segment were as follows:

(in thousands)
	Asset			Investment
	Management			Portfolio			Corporate			Total
June 30, 2019		$	1,476		$	245,693		$	12,593		$	259,762
December 31, 2018			1,488			245,866			12,046			259,400

Asset Management Segment

Advisory Services Revenue

Advisory services revenue consists of management fees and overhead reimbursements charged to Orchid for the management of its portfolio pursuant to the terms of a management agreement. We receive a monthly management fee in the amount of:

·	One-twelfth of 1.5% of the first $250 million of Orchid’s month-end equity, as defined in the management agreement,

·	One-twelfth of 1.25% of Orchid’s month-end equity that is greater than $250 million and less than or equal to $500 million, and

·	One-twelfth of 1.00% of Orchid’s month-end equity that is greater than $500 million.

In addition, Orchid is obligated to reimburse us for any direct expenses incurred on its behalf and to pay to us an amount equal to Orchid's pro rata portion of certain overhead costs set forth in the management agreement. The management agreement has been renewed through February 2020 and provides for automatic one-year extension options. Should Orchid terminate the management agreement without cause, it will be obligated to pay to us a termination fee equal to three times the average annual management fee, as defined in the management agreement, before or on the last day of the automatic renewal term.

The following table summarizes the advisory services revenue received from Orchid in each quarter during 2019 and 2018.

(in thousands)
	Average		Average		Advisory Services
	Orchid		Orchid		Management		Overhead
Three Months Ended	MBS		Equity		Fee		Allocation		Total
June 30, 2019	$	3,307,885	$	363,961	$	1,327	$	327	$	1,654
March 31, 2019		3,051,509		363,204		1,285		322		1,607
December 31, 2018		3,264,230		395,911		1,404		434		1,838
September 30, 2018		3,601,776		431,962		1,482		391		1,873
June 30, 2018		3,717,690		469,974		1,606		361		1,967
March 31, 2018		3,745,298		488,906		1,712		381		2,093

Investment Portfolio Segment

Net Portfolio Interest Income

We define net portfolio interest income as interest income on MBS less interest expense on repurchase agreement funding. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, we generated $1.7 million of net portfolio interest income, consisting of $4.3 million of interest income from MBS assets offset by $2.7 million of interest expense on repurchase liabilities. For the comparable period ended June 30, 2018, we generated $2.3 million of net portfolio interest income, consisting of $4.1 million of interest income from MBS assets offset by $1.7 million of interest expense on repurchase liabilities. The $0.2 million increase in interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was due to a $10.7 million increase in average MBS balances, combined with a 2 basis point ("bp") increase in yields earned on the portfolio. The $0.9 million increase in interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was due to a combination of a $9.0 million increase in average repurchase liabilities and an 83 bp increase in cost of funds.

-30-

Our economic interest expense on repurchase liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $2.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively, resulting in $1.5 million and $2.1 million of economic net portfolio interest income, respectively.

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, we generated $0.8 million of net portfolio interest income, consisting of $2.1 million of interest income from MBS assets offset by $1.3 million of interest expense on repurchase liabilities. For the three months ended June 30, 2018, we generated $1.1 million of net portfolio interest income, consisting of $2.0 million of interest income from MBS assets offset by $0.9 million of interest expense on repurchase liabilities. The $0.1 million increase in interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was due to a $16.7 million increase in average MBS balances, offset by a 7 bp decrease in yields earned on the portfolio. The $0.4 million increase in interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was due to a combination of a $15.3 million increase in average repurchase liabilities and a 65 bp increase in cost of funds.

Our economic interest expense on repurchase liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $1.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively, resulting in $0.6 million and $1.0 million of economic net portfolio interest income, respectively.

The tables below provide information on our portfolio average balances, interest income, yield on assets, average repurchase agreement balances, interest expense, cost of funds, net interest income and net interest rate spread for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 and each quarter in 2019 and 2018 on both a GAAP and economic basis.

($ in thousands)
	Average				Yield on			Average		Interest Expense				Average Cost of Funds
	MBS		Interest		Average			Repurchase		GAAP		Economic		GAAP			Economic
Three Months Ended	Held ⁽¹⁾		Income ⁽²⁾		MBS			Agreements ⁽¹⁾		Basis		Basis ⁽²⁾		Basis			Basis ⁽³⁾
June 30, 2019	$	211,406	$	2,134		4.04	%	$	199,901	$	1,340	$	1,566		2.68	%		3.13	%
March 31, 2019		212,033		2,190		4.13	%		199,771		1,313		1,308		2.63	%		2.62	%
December 31, 2018		212,317		2,227		4.20	%		202,069		1,235		1,101		2.44	%		2.18	%
September 30, 2018		198,367		2,054		4.14	%		189,582		1,049		1,084		2.21	%		2.29	%
June 30, 2018		194,677		2,001		4.11	%		184,621		938		1,046		2.03	%		2.27	%
March 31, 2018		207,261		2,080		4.01	%		197,001		808		962		1.64	%		1.96	%

($ in thousands)
	Average				Yield on			Average		Interest Expense				Average Cost of Funds
	MBS		Interest		Average			Repurchase		GAAP		Economic		GAAP			Economic
Six Months Ended	Held ⁽¹⁾		Income ⁽²⁾		MBS			Agreements ⁽¹⁾		Basis		Basis ⁽²⁾		Basis			Basis ⁽³⁾
June 30, 2019	$	211,719	$	4,324		4.08	%	$	199,836	$	2,653	$	2,874		2.66	%		2.88	%
June 30, 2018		200,969		4,081		4.06	%		190,811		1,746		2,008		1.83	%		2.11	%

-31-

($ in thousands)
	Net Portfolio				Net Portfolio
	Interest Income				Interest Spread
	GAAP		Economic		GAAP			Economic
Three Months Ended	Basis		Basis ⁽²⁾		Basis			Basis ⁽⁴⁾
June 30, 2019	$	794	$	568		1.36	%		0.91	%
March 31, 2019		877		882		1.50	%		1.51	%
December 31, 2018		992		1,126		1.76	%		2.02	%
September 30, 2018		1,005		970		1.93	%		1.85	%
June 30, 2018		1,063		955		2.08	%		1.84	%
March 31, 2018		1,272		1,118		2.37	%		2.05	%

($ in thousands)
	Net Portfolio				Net Portfolio
	Interest Income				Interest Spread
	GAAP		Economic		GAAP			Economic
Six Months Ended	Basis		Basis ⁽²⁾		Basis			Basis ⁽⁴⁾
June 30, 2019	$	1,671	$	1,450		1.42	%		1.20	%
June 30, 2018		2,335		2,073		2.23	%		1.95	%

(1)

Portfolio yields and costs of borrowings presented in the tables above and the tables on pages 33 and 34 are calculated based on the average balances of the underlying investment portfolio/repurchase agreement balances and are annualized for the periods presented. Average balances for quarterly periods are calculated using two data points, the beginning and ending balances.

(2)	Economic interest expense and economic net interest income presented in the tables above and the tables on page 31 include the effect of derivative instrument hedges for only the period presented.

(3)	Represents interest cost of our borrowings and the effect of derivative instrument hedges attributed to the period related to hedging activities divided by average MBS.

(4)	Economic net interest spread is calculated by subtracting average economic cost of funds from yield on average MBS.

Interest Income and Average Earning Asset Yield

Our interest income was $4.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $4.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Average MBS holdings were $211.7 million and $201.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The $0.2 million increase in interest income was due to combination of a 2 bp increase in yields and a $10.7 million increase in average MBS holdings.

Our interest income was $2.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018. Average MBS holdings were $211.4 million and $194.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The $0.1 million increase in interest income was due to a $16.7 million increase in average MBS holdings, offset by a 7 bp decrease in yields.

-32-

The tables below present the average portfolio size, income and yields of our respective sub-portfolios, consisting of structured MBS and PT MBS, for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, and for each quarter during 2019 and 2018.

($ in thousands)
	Average MBS Held						Interest Income						Realized Yield on Average MBS
	PT		Structured				PT		Structured				PT			Structured
Three Months Ended	MBS		MBS		Total		MBS		MBS		Total		MBS			MBS			Total
June 30, 2019	$	209,171	$	2,235	$	211,406	$	2,111	$	23	$	2,134		4.04	%		4.01	%		4.04	%
March 31, 2019		209,469		2,564		212,033		2,143		47		2,190		4.09	%		7.42	%		4.13	%
December 31, 2018		209,971		2,346		212,317		2,181		46		2,227		4.15	%		7.85	%		4.20	%
September 30, 2018		196,305		2,062		198,367		2,008		46		2,054		4.09	%		8.94	%		4.14	%
June 30, 2018		192,368		2,309		194,677		1,959		42		2,001		4.07	%		7.16	%		4.11	%
March 31, 2018		204,786		2,475		207,261		2,054		26		2,080		4.01	%		4.29	%		4.01	%

($ in thousands)
	Average MBS Held						Interest Income						Realized Yield on Average MBS
	PT		Structured				PT		Structured				PT			Structured
Six Months Ended	MBS		MBS		Total		MBS		MBS		Total		MBS			MBS			Total
June 30, 2019	$	209,320	$	2,399	$	211,719	$	4,254	$	70	$	4,324		4.06	%		5.83	%		4.08	%
June 30, 2018		198,577		2,392		200,969		4,013		68		4,081		4.04	%		5.68	%		4.06	%

Interest Expense on Repurchase Agreements and the Cost of Funds

Our average outstanding balances under repurchase agreements were $199.8 million and $190.8 million, generating interest expense of $2.7 million and $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Our average cost of funds was 2.66% and 1.83% for six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. There was an 83 bp increase in the average cost of funds and a $9.0 million increase in average outstanding repurchase agreements during the six months ended June 30, 2019, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Our economic interest expense was $2.9 million and $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. There was a 77 bp increase in the average economic cost of funds to 2.88% for the six months ended June 30, 2019 from 2.11% for the six months ended June 30, 2018. The $0.9 million increase in economic interest expense was due to the $9.0 million increase in average outstanding repurchase agreements during the six months ended June 30, 2019, combined with the negative performance of our derivative holdings attributed to the current period.

Our average outstanding balances under repurchase agreements were $199.9 million and $184.6 million, generating interest expense of $1.3 million and $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Our average cost of funds was 2.68% and 2.03% for three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. There was a 65 bp increase in the average cost of funds and a $15.3 million increase in average outstanding repurchase agreements during the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2018.

Our economic interest expense was $1.6 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. There was an 86 basis point increase in the average economic cost of funds to 3.13% for the three months ended June 30, 2019 from 2.27% for the three months ended June 30, 2018. The $0.6 million increase in economic interest expense was due to the $15.3 million increase in average outstanding repurchase agreements during the three months ended June 30, 2019, combined with the negative performance of our derivative agreements attributed to the current period.

-33-

Because all of our repurchase agreements are short-term, changes in market rates have a more immediate impact on our interest expense. Our average cost of funds calculated on a GAAP basis was 23 bps above the average one-month LIBOR and 19 bps above the average six-month LIBOR for the quarter ended June 30, 2019. Our average economic cost of funds was 68 bps above the average one-month LIBOR and 64 bps above the average six-month LIBOR for the quarter ended June 30, 2019. The average term to maturity of the outstanding repurchase agreements increased from 31 days at December 31, 2018 to 37 days at June 30, 2019.

The tables below present the average outstanding balances under our repurchase agreements, interest expense and average economic cost of funds, and average one-month and six-month LIBOR rates for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, and for each quarter in 2019 and 2018, on both a GAAP and economic basis.

($ in thousands)
	Average
	Balance of		Interest Expense				Average Cost of Funds
	Repurchase		GAAP		Economic		GAAP			Economic
Three Months Ended	Agreements		Basis		Basis		Basis			Basis
June 30, 2019	$	199,901	$	1,340	$	1,566		2.68	%		3.13	%
March 31, 2019		199,771		1,313		1,308		2.63	%		2.62	%
December 31, 2018		202,069		1,235		1,101		2.44	%		2.18	%
September 30, 2018		189,582		1,049		1,084		2.21	%		2.29	%
June 30, 2018		184,621		938		1,046		2.03	%		2.27	%
March 31, 2018		197,001		808		962		1.64	%		1.96	%

($ in thousands)
	Average
	Balance of		Interest Expense				Average Cost of Funds
	Repurchase		GAAP		Economic		GAAP			Economic
Six Months Ended	Agreements		Basis		Basis		Basis			Basis
June 30, 2019	$	199,836	$	2,653	$	2,874		2.66	%		2.88	%
June 30, 2018		190,811		1,746		2,008		1.83	%		2.11	%

							Average GAAP Cost of Funds						Average Economic Cost of Funds
							Relative to Average						Relative to Average
	Average LIBOR						One-Month			Six-Month			One-Month			Six-Month
Three Months Ended	One-Month			Six-Month			LIBOR			LIBOR			LIBOR			LIBOR
June 30, 2019		2.45	%		2.49	%		0.23	%		0.19	%		0.68	%		0.64	%
March 31, 2019		2.50	%		2.77	%		0.13	%		(0.14	)%		0.12	%		(0.15	)%
December 31, 2018		2.39	%		2.74	%		0.05	%		(0.30	)%		(0.21	)%		(0.56	)%
September 30, 2018		2.17	%		2.55	%		0.04	%		(0.34	)%		0.12	%		(0.26	)%
June 30, 2018		1.99	%		2.48	%		0.04	%		(0.45	)%		0.28	%		(0.21	)%
March 31, 2018		1.69	%		2.11	%		(0.05	)%		(0.47	)%		0.27	%		(0.15	)%


							Average GAAP Cost of Funds						Average Economic Cost of Funds
							Relative to Average						Relative to Average
	Average LIBOR						One-Month			Six-Month			One-Month			Six-Month
Six Months Ended	One-Month			Six-Month			LIBOR			LIBOR			LIBOR			LIBOR
June 30, 2019		2.48	%		2.63	%		0.18	%		0.03	%		0.40	%		0.25	%
June 30, 2018		1.84	%		2.30	%		(0.01	)%		(0.47	)%		0.27	%		(0.19	)%

-34-

Dividend Income

We have owned 1,520,036 shares of Orchid common stock since March 2017. Orchid paid total dividends of $0.48 per share and $0.24 per share during the six and three months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, and $0.58 per share and $0.27 per share during the six and three months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. During the six and three months ended June 30, 2019, we received dividends on this common stock investment of approximately $0.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively, compared to $0.9 million and $0.4 million during the six and three months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.

Junior Subordinated Notes

Interest expense on our junior subordinated debt securities was $0.8 million and $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The average rate of interest paid for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was 6.17% compared to 5.43% for the comparable period in 2018.

Interest expense on our junior subordinated debt securities was $0.4 million and $0.4 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The average rate of interest paid for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was 6.08% compared to 5.66% for the comparable period in 2018.

The junior subordinated debt securities pay interest at a floating rate. The rate is adjusted quarterly and set at a spread of 3.50% over the prevailing three-month LIBOR rate on the determination date. As of June 30, 2019, the interest rate was 5.91%.

Gains or Losses and Other Income

The table below presents our gains or losses and other income for the six and three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

(in thousands)
	Six Months Ended June 30,									Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			Change			2019			2018			Change
Realized gains (losses) on sales of MBS	$	-		$	(103	)	$	103		$	-		$	(103	)	$	103
Unrealized gains (losses) on MBS		5,276			(6,814	)		12,090			2,224			(1,934	)		4,158
Total gains (losses) on MBS		5,276			(6,917	)		12,193			2,224			(2,037	)		4,261
(Losses) gains on derivative instruments		(5,622	)		2,610			(8,232	)		(3,364	)		870			(4,234	)
Gains (losses) on retained interests in securitizations		275			(252	)		527			-			(169	)		169
Unrealized (losses) gains on
Orchid Island Capital, Inc. common stock		(46	)		(2,675	)		2,629			(334	)		228			(562	)

We invest in MBS with the intent to earn net income from the realized yield on those assets over their related funding and hedging costs, and not for the purpose of making short term gains from trading in these securities. However, we have sold, and may continue to sell, existing assets to acquire new assets, which our management believes might have higher risk-adjusted returns in light of current or anticipated interest rates, federal government programs or general economic conditions or to manage our balance sheet as part of our asset/liability management strategy. We did not sell any MBS during the six months ended June 30, 2019. During the six and three months ended June 30, 2018, the Company received proceeds of $9.1 million from the sales of MBS.

-35-

The fair value of our MBS portfolio and derivative instruments, and the gains (losses) reported on those financial instruments, are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table below presents historical interest rate data for each quarter end during 2019 and 2018.

	5 Year			10 Year			15 Year			30 Year			Three
	U.S. Treasury			U.S. Treasury			Fixed-Rate			Fixed-Rate			Month
	Rate ⁽¹⁾			Rate ⁽¹⁾			Mortgage Rate ⁽²⁾			Mortgage Rate ⁽²⁾			Libor ⁽³⁾
June 30, 2019		1.76	%		2.00	%		3.24	%		3.80	%		2.40	%
March 31, 2019		2.24	%		2.41	%		3.72	%		4.27	%		2.61	%
December 31, 2018		2.51	%		2.69	%		4.09	%		4.64	%		2.80	%
September 30, 2018		2.95	%		3.06	%		4.08	%		4.63	%		2.40	%
June 30, 2018		2.73	%		2.85	%		4.04	%		4.57	%		2.34	%
March 31, 2018		2.56	%		2.74	%		3.91	%		4.44	%		2.31	%

(1)	Historical 5 Year and 10 Year U.S. Treasury Rates are obtained from quoted end of day prices on the Chicago Board Options Exchange.

(2)	Historical 30 Year and 15 Year Fixed Rate Mortgage Rates are obtained from Freddie Mac’s Primary Mortgage Market Survey.

(3)	Historical LIBOR are obtained from the Intercontinental Exchange Benchmark Administration Ltd.

Operating Expenses

For the six and three months ended June 30, 2019, our total operating expenses were approximately $3.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively, compared to approximately $3.4 million and $1.7 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. The table below presents a breakdown of operating expenses for the six and three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

(in thousands)
	Six Months Ended June 30,							Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		Change			2019		2018		Change
Compensation and related benefits	$	2,088	$	2,103	$	(15	)	$	1,017	$	1,036	$	(19	)
Legal fees		96		106		(10	)		70		40		30
Accounting, auditing and other professional fees		188		193		(5	)		75		83		(8	)
Directors’ fees and liability insurance		321		321		-			161		161		-
Administrative and other expenses		526		667		(141	)		275		331		(56	)
	$	3,219	$	3,390	$	(171	)	$	1,598	$	1,651	$	(53	)

Financial Condition:

Mortgage-Backed Securities

As of June 30, 2019, our MBS portfolio consisted of $211.2 million of agency or government MBS at fair value and had a weighted average coupon of 4.25%. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, we received principal repayments of $9.8 million compared to $14.2 million for the comparable period ended June 30, 2018. The average prepayment speeds for the quarters ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were 10.5% and 13.1%, respectively.

-36-

The following table presents the 3-month constant prepayment rate (“CPR”) experienced on our structured and PT MBS sub-portfolios, on an annualized basis, for the quarterly periods presented. CPR is a method of expressing the prepayment rate for a mortgage pool that assumes that a constant fraction of the remaining principal is prepaid each month or year. Specifically, the CPR in the chart below represents the three month prepayment rate of the securities in the respective asset category. Assets that were not owned for the entire quarter have been excluded from the calculation. The exclusion of certain assets during periods of high trading activity can create a very high, and often volatile, reliance on a small sample of underlying loans.

			Structured
	PT MBS		MBS		Total
Three Months Ended	Portfolio (%)		Portfolio (%)		Portfolio (%)
June 30, 2019		9.9		14.6		10.5
March 31, 2019		5.7		13.4		6.8
December 31, 2018		5.5		11.7		6.6
September 30, 2018		8.6		13.5		9.5
June 30, 2018		13.4		11.6		13.1
March 31, 2018		7.2		16.8		8.6

The following tables summarize certain characteristics of our PT MBS and structured MBS as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

($ in thousands)
					Weighted
			Percentage		Average
			of	Weighted	Maturity
		Fair	Entire	Average	in	Longest
Asset Category		Value	Portfolio	Coupon	Months	Maturity
June 30, 2019
Fixed Rate MBS	$	209,080	99.0%	4.25%	316	1-May-49
Interest-Only MBS		1,472	0.7%	3.69%	908	25-Dec-39
Inverse Interest-Only MBS		618	0.3%	4.16%	260	25-Apr-41
Total MBS Portfolio	$	211,170	100.0%	4.25%	320	1-May-49
December 31, 2018
Fixed Rate MBS	$	209,675	98.7%	4.26%	327	1-Aug-48
Interest-Only MBS		2,021	1.0%	3.69%	293	15-Jul-48
Inverse Interest-Only MBS		728	0.3%	4.06%	272	25-Apr-41
Total MBS Portfolio	$	212,424	100.0%	4.25%	327	1-Aug-48

($ in thousands)
	June 30, 2019					December 31, 2018
			Percentage of					Percentage of
Agency	Fair Value		Entire Portfolio			Fair Value		Entire Portfolio
Fannie Mae	$	193,306		91.5	%	$	193,437		91.1	%
Freddie Mac		17,797		8.4	%		18,881		8.9	%
Ginnie Mae		67		0.1	%		106		0.0	%
Total Portfolio	$	211,170		100.0	%	$	212,424		100.0	%

-37-

	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Weighted Average Pass-through Purchase Price	$	106.77	$	106.81
Weighted Average Structured Purchase Price	$	6.39	$	6.39
Weighted Average Pass-through Current Price	$	106.89	$	103.87
Weighted Average Structured Current Price	$	7.54	$	8.67
Effective Duration ⁽¹⁾		2.497		3.935

(1)

Effective duration is the approximate percentage change in price for a 100 basis point change in rates. An effective duration of 2.497 indicates that an interest rate increase of 1.0% would be expected to cause a 2.497% decrease in the value of the MBS in our investment portfolio at June 30, 2019. An effective duration of 3.935 indicates that an interest rate increase of 1.0% would be expected to cause a 3.935% decrease in the value of the MBS in our investment portfolio at December 31, 2018. These figures include the structured securities in the portfolio but do include the effect of our hedges. Effective duration quotes for individual investments are obtained from The Yield Book, Inc.

The following table presents a summary of our portfolio assets acquired during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

($ in thousands)
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019								2018
		Total Cost		Average Price		Weighted Average Yield				Total Cost		Average Price		Weighted Average Yield
PT MBS		$	3,285	$	104.12		3.35	%		$	5,081	$	106.17		2.65	%

Our portfolio of PT MBS is typically comprised of adjustable-rate MBS, fixed-rate MBS and hybrid adjustable-rate MBS. We generally seek to acquire low duration assets that offer high levels of protection from mortgage prepayments provided that they are reasonably priced by the market. Although the duration of an individual asset can change as a result of changes in interest rates, we strive to maintain a hedged PT MBS portfolio with an effective duration of less than 2.0. The stated contractual final maturity of the mortgage loans underlying our portfolio of PT MBS generally ranges up to 30 years. However, the effect of prepayments of the underlying mortgage loans tends to shorten the resulting cash flows from our investments substantially. Prepayments occur for various reasons, including refinancing of underlying mortgages, loan payoffs in connection with home sales, and borrowers paying more than their scheduled loan payments, which accelerates the amortization of the loans.

The duration of our IO and IIO portfolio will vary greatly depending on the structural features of the securities. While prepayment activity will always affect the cash flows associated with the securities, the interest only nature of IO’s may cause their durations to become extremely negative when prepayments are high, and less negative when prepayments are low. Prepayments affect the durations of IIO’s similarly, but the floating rate nature of the coupon of IIOs (which is inversely related to the level of one month LIBOR) causes their price movements - and model duration - to be affected by changes in both prepayments and one month LIBOR - both current and anticipated levels. As a result, the duration of IIO securities will also vary greatly.

Prepayments on the loans underlying our MBS can alter the timing of the cash flows received by us. As a result, we gauge the interest rate sensitivity of its assets by measuring their effective duration. While modified duration measures the price sensitivity of a bond to movements in interest rates, effective duration captures both the movement in interest rates and the fact that cash flows to a mortgage related security are altered when interest rates move. Accordingly, when the contract interest rate on a mortgage loan is substantially above prevailing interest rates in the market, the effective duration of securities collateralized by such loans can be quite low because of expected prepayments.

-38-

We face the risk that the market value of our PT MBS assets will increase or decrease at different rates than that of our structured MBS or liabilities, including our hedging instruments. Accordingly, we assess our interest rate risk by estimating the duration of our assets and the duration of our liabilities. We generally calculate duration and effective duration using various third-party models or obtain these quotes from third parties. However, empirical results and various third-party models may produce different duration numbers for the same securities.

The following sensitivity analysis shows the estimated impact on the fair value of our interest rate-sensitive investments and hedge positions as of June 30, 2019, assuming rates instantaneously fall 100 bps, rise 100 bps and rise 200 bps, adjusted to reflect the impact of convexity, which is the measure of the sensitivity of our hedge positions and Agency MBS’ effective duration to movements in interest rates.

($ in thousands)
	Fair		$ Change in Fair Value									% Change in Fair Value
MBS Portfolio	Value		-100BPS			+100BPS			+200BPS			-100BPS			+100BPS			+200BPS
Fixed Rate MBS	$	209,080	$	4,509		$	(8,010	)	$	(18,866	)		2.16	%		(3.83	)%		(9.02	)%
Interest-Only MBS		1,472		(480	)		544			862			(32.61	)%		36.95	%		58.51	%
Inverse Interest-Only MBS		618		(65	)		24			(69	)		(10.44	)%		3.82	%		(11.12	)%
Total MBS Portfolio	$	211,170	$	3,964		$	(7,442	)	$	(18,073	)		1.88	%		(3.52	)%		(8.56	)%

($ in thousands)
	Notional		$ Change in Fair Value									% Change in Fair Value
	Amount ⁽¹⁾		-100BPS			+100BPS			+200BPS			-100BPS			+100BPS			+200BPS
Eurodollar Futures Contracts
Repurchase Agreement Hedges	$	130,000	$	(3,250	)	$	3,250		$	6,500			(1.02	)%		1.02	%		2.03	%
Junior Subordinated Debt Hedges		26,000		(325	)		325			650			(1.02	)%		1.02	%		2.04	%
Treasury Futures		25,000		(1,158	)		1,118			2,198			(4.63	)%		4.47	%		8.79	%
TBA Contracts		65,000		(998	)		2,641			6,733			(1.50	)%		3.97	%		10.13	%
	$	246,000	$	(5,731	)	$	7,334		$	16,081

Gross Totals			$	(1,767	)	$	(108	)	$	(1,992	)

(1)	Represents the average contract/notional amount of Eurodollar futures contracts.

In addition to changes in interest rates, other factors impact the fair value of our interest rate-sensitive investments and hedging instruments, such as the shape of the yield curve, market expectations as to future interest rate changes and other market conditions. Accordingly, in the event of changes in actual interest rates, the change in the fair value of our assets would likely differ from that shown above and such difference might be material and adverse to our stockholders.

Repurchase Agreements

As of June 30, 2019, we had established borrowing facilities in the repurchase agreement market with a number of commercial banks and other financial institutions and had borrowings in place with six of these counterparties. We believe these facilities provide borrowing capacity in excess of our needs. None of these lenders are affiliated with us. These borrowings are secured by our MBS.

As of June 30, 2019, we had obligations outstanding under the repurchase agreements of approximately $200.7 million with a net weighted average borrowing cost of 2.63%. The remaining maturity of our outstanding repurchase agreement obligations ranged from 1 to 101 days, with a weighted average maturity of 37 days. Securing the repurchase agreement obligation as of June 30, 2019 are MBS with an estimated fair value, including accrued interest, of $211.9 million and a weighted average maturity of 317 months. Through August 9, 2019, we have been able to maintain our repurchase facilities with comparable terms to those that existed at June 30, 2019 with maturities through October 9, 2019.

-39-

The table below presents information about our period-end, maximum and average repurchase agreement obligations for each quarter in 2019 and 2018.

($ in thousands)
	Ending		Maximum		Average		Difference Between Ending
	Balance		Balance		Balance		Repurchase Agreements and
	of Repurchase		of Repurchase		of Repurchase		Average Repurchase Agreements
Three Months Ended	Agreements		Agreements		Agreements		Amount			Percent
June 30, 2019	$	200,656	$	200,776	$	199,901	$	755			0.38	%
March 31, 2019		199,146		200,113		199,771		(625	)		(0.31	)%
December 31, 2018		200,396		203,746		202,069		(1,673	)		(0.83	)%
September 30, 2018		203,742		204,988		189,582		14,160			7.47	%
June 30, 2018		175,422		193,753		184,621		(9,199	)		(4.98	)%
March 31, 2018		193,820		204,998		197,001		(3,181	)		(1.61	)%

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is our ability to turn non-cash assets into cash, purchase additional investments, repay principal and interest on borrowings, fund overhead and fulfill margin calls. Our principal immediate sources of liquidity include cash balances, unencumbered assets, the availability to borrow under repurchase agreements, and fees and dividends received from Orchid. Our borrowing capacity will vary over time as the market value of our interest earning assets varies. Our balance sheet also generates liquidity on an on-going basis through payments of principal and interest we receive on our MBS portfolio. Management believes that we currently have sufficient liquidity and capital resources available for (a) the acquisition of additional investments consistent with the size and nature of our existing MBS portfolio, (b) the repayments on borrowings, (c) the payment of overhead and operating expenses, and (d) the payment of other accrued obligations.

Our hedging strategy typically involves taking short positions in Eurodollar futures, T-Note futures, TBAs or other instruments. Since inception we have primarily used short positions in Eurodollar futures. When the market causes these short positions to decline in value we are required to meet margin calls with cash. This can reduce our liquidity position to the extent other securities in our portfolio move in price in such a way that we do not receive enough cash through margin calls to offset the Eurodollar related margin calls. If this were to occur in sufficient magnitude, the loss of liquidity might force us to reduce the size of the levered portfolio, pledge additional structured securities to raise funds or risk operating the portfolio with less liquidity.

Our master repurchase agreements have no stated expiration, but can be terminated at any time at our option or at the option of the counterparty. However, once a definitive repurchase agreement under a master repurchase agreement has been entered into, it generally may not be terminated by either party. A negotiated termination can occur, but may involve a fee to be paid by the party seeking to terminate the repurchase agreement transaction.

Under our repurchase agreement funding arrangements, we are required to post margin at the initiation of the borrowing. The margin posted represents the haircut, which is a percentage of the market value of the collateral pledged. To the extent the market value of the asset collateralizing the financing transaction declines, the market value of our posted margin will be insufficient and we will be required to post additional collateral. Conversely, if the market value of the asset pledged increases in value, we would be over collateralized and we would be entitled to have excess margin returned to us by the counterparty. Our lenders typically value our pledged securities daily to ensure the adequacy of our margin and make margin calls as needed, as do we. Typically, but not always, the parties agree to a minimum threshold amount for margin calls so as to avoid the need for nuisance margin calls on a daily basis.

-40-

As discussed above, we invest a portion of our capital in structured MBS. We generally do not apply leverage to this portion of our portfolio. The leverage inherent in the structured securities replaces the leverage obtained by acquiring PT securities and funding them in the repurchase market. This structured MBS strategy has been a core element of the Company’s overall investment strategy since 2008. However, we have and may continue to pledge a portion of our structured MBS in order to raise our cash levels, but generally will not pledge these securities in order to acquire additional assets.

In future periods we expect to continue to finance our activities through repurchase agreements. As of June 30, 2019, we had cash and cash equivalents of $5.9 million. We generated cash flows of $14.2 million from principal and interest payments on our MBS portfolio and had average repurchase agreements outstanding of $199.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2019. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2019, we received approximately $3.4 million in management fees and expense reimbursements as manager of Orchid and approximately $0.7 million in dividends from our investment in Orchid common stock.

In July 2019, we completed a “modified Dutch auction” tender offer and paid an aggregate of $2.2 million, excluding fees and related expenses, to repurchase 1.1 million shares of our Class A common stock, which were retired, at a price of $2.00 per share. In order to fund the share-repurchase we sold MBS assets with an approximate fair market at time of sale, including accrued interest, of $44.0 million. We anticipate being able to replenish our RMBS portfolio with available cash beginning in the third quarter of 2019.

The table below summarizes the effect that certain future contractual obligations existing as of June 30, 2019 will have on our liquidity and cash flows.

(in thousands)
	Obligations Maturing
	Within One Year		One to Three Years		Three to Five Years		More than Five Years		Total
Repurchase agreements	$	200,656	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	200,656
Interest expense on repurchase agreements ⁽¹⁾		1,282		-		-		-		1,282
Junior subordinated notes ⁽²⁾		-		-		-		26,000		26,000
Interest expense on junior subordinated notes ⁽¹⁾		1,622		3,116		3,120		17,864		25,737
Other		250
Totals	$	203,810	$	3,116	$	3,120	$	43,864	$	253,910

(1)	Interest expense on repurchase agreements and junior subordinated notes are based on current interest rates as of June 30, 2019 and the remaining term of liabilities existing at that date.

(2)	We hold a common equity interest in Bimini Capital Trust II. The amount presented represents our net cash outlay.

Outlook

Orchid Island Capital Inc.

To the extent Orchid is able to increase its capital base over time, we will benefit via increased management fees. In addition, Orchid is obligated to reimburse us for direct expenses paid on its behalf and to pay to us Orchid’s pro rata share of overhead as defined in the management agreement. As a stockholder of Orchid, we will also continue to share in distributions, if any, paid by Orchid to its stockholders. Our operating results are also impacted by changes in the market value of our holdings of Orchid common shares, although these market value changes do not impact our cash flows from Orchid.

The independent Board of Directors of Orchid has the ability to terminate the management agreement and thus end our ability to collect management fees and share overhead costs. Should Orchid terminate the management agreement without cause, it will be obligated to pay us a termination fee equal to three times the average annual management fee, as defined in the management agreement, before or on the last day of the current automatic renewal term.

-41-

Interest Rates and the MBS Market

The transition in the outlook for the economy and interest rate policy on the part of the Fed that started during the fourth quarter of 2018 continued during the second quarter of 2019. After switching from a tightening bias and hiking the Fed Funds rate for the ninth time in December 2018, the Fed shifted to a balanced outlook during the first quarter of 2019. The Fed shifted again during the second quarter of 2019. The domestic economy in the U.S. appeared to be slowing somewhat, mainly as a result of the manufacturing sector slowing from the torrid pace of 2018. Growth in the consumer/consumption sector remains solid, supported by a still strong job market with greater than 3% wage growth. However, growth overseas is clearly slowing. These developments, coupled with inflation moving below the Fed’s 2% target, caused the Fed to shift its policy outlook from stable to leaning towards an easing policy. The Fed did ease the target for the Fed Funds rate at their meeting which concluded on July 31, 2019.

The Fed was not the only central bank to shift its policy outlook. The European Central Bank (the “ECB”) also adopted a more accommodative outlook at their meeting on June 6, 2019. The shift in policy on the part of the Fed and the ECB was brought about by several developments. Central to these developments are the significant risks to the global growth outlook, coupled with declining inflation expectations. The greatest risk to global growth is in turn the deteriorating trade environment. Trade talks between the U.S. and China broke down in early May 2019 and were not resurrected, as had been expected, at the G-20 meeting in late June 2019. Secondly, as part of his efforts to address the immigration crisis at the southern border of the U.S., President Trump surprised the market in late May 2019 with threats to impose significant tariffs on goods imported from Mexico. Negotiations followed shortly thereafter. The tariffs have been set aside for now, but the impact on market sentiment and risk premiums was significant. Trade uncertainty is the most frequently cited concern by central bankers across the globe – especially the ECB and the Fed. The manufacturing side of the global economy has clearly been slowing, as global purchasing manager surveys have declined and are on the verge of breaking below the psychologically important 50 level. Adding to growth pessimism during the second quarter of 2019, the Prime Minister of the U.K., Theresa May, resigned as her efforts to orchestrate an orderly Brexit from the European Union (the “EU”) floundered. On Wednesday, July 24, 2019, Boris Johnson became the new Prime Minister; however, the outlook for an orderly Brexit remains uncertain.

The market reaction to the announcement of the possible tariffs on Mexican imported goods was a significant rally as rates declined and the U.S. Treasury curve inverted (as reflected by the spread between 3-month treasury bills and the ten-year U.S. Treasury note), briefly before recovering into positive territory in early July. As reflected by Fed Funds futures contracts, the market expected the Fed to lower the Fed Funds target range with two or three 25 bp moves over the balance of 2019 as of June 30, 2019. There has been a pronounced shift in the tone of the Fed chairman and the various members of the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”). Based on their public comments, the chairman and the various other governors appear to be focused on the outlook for trade negotiations, global growth and inflation levels/expectations going forward. They appear to be willing to look past the current state of growth – which remains solid. This was again the case at the Chairman’s press conference following their meeting on July 31, 2019 after the Fed had lowered the Fed Funds rate by 25 bps. Shortly thereafter, trade tensions increased significantly when the administration announced potential additional tariffs of 10% on up to $300 billion of additional goods imported from China commencing September 1, 2019. The Chinese retaliated in the following days and the markets have reacted with a significant “risk off” sell-off in risk assets and corresponding rally in safe haven assets. The curve has since inverted again.

The Agency MBS market had a positive total return for the second quarter of 2.0% per data provided by Bank of Merrill Lynch/ICE Data Indices. With the decline in interest rates occurring over the course of the quarter, longer duration coupons outperformed shorter duration coupons and 30-year securities outperformed 15-year securities. However, returns versus equivalent duration U.S. Treasuries were negative across the Agency MBS universe. As interest rates fell, rate volatility rose, both realized and implied, and prepayment fears increased. Both of these developments are typically bad for MBS securities. As interest rates settled into a range near the end of the second quarter and into the third quarter, volatility has declined and Agency MBS assets have outperformed comparable duration U.S. Treasuries.

-42-

In June 2019 the Uniform MBS (“UMBS”) began trading. UMBS are passthrough securities representing an interest in a pool of residential mortgages that are issued and guaranteed by either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. The UMBS were designed to eliminate differences in underwriting, servicing and trading levels between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities and to increase liquidity in the TBA market. It remains to be seen how effective the UMBS program will be at accomplishing these objectives. The other significant development in the Agency MBS market was the continued deterioration in the TBA market. With lower rates available to borrowers and rates continuing to decline into the third quarter – refinancing activity has increased and all agency loans outside of the specified pool market continue to exhibit very poor prepayment behavior. The collateral generally has historically high gross weighted average coupons for any given coupon, higher loan balances and higher FICO scores – all consistent with higher prepayment expectations. This has led to a material increase in premiums charged for pools with more desirable prepayment characteristics. While these premiums have increased, and are very high for the current level of rates, the all-in price for specified securities is historically low for the level of rates. This is because the dollar prices for the various TBA securities is very low for the level of rates – reflecting the very poor prepayment characteristics of the TBA collateral.

Recent Regulatory Developments

In September 2017, the FOMC announced that it would implement a balance sheet normalization policy by gradually decreasing the Fed’s reinvestment of U.S. Treasuries and Agency MBS. More specifically, principal payments received by the Fed will be reinvested only to the extent they exceed gradually rising caps until the FOMC determines that the Fed is holding no more securities than necessary to implement monetary policy efficiently and effectively. In October 2017, the FOMC commenced this balance sheet normalization program. At the conclusion of the March 2019 FOMC meeting, the Fed said that the FOMC intends to slow the pace of the decline in its holdings of U.S. Treasuries and Agency MBS over coming quarters provided that the economy and money market conditions evolve about as expected. The Fed specified that the FOMC intends to reduce the run-off of its holdings of U.S. Treasury securities by reducing the cap on monthly redemptions from the current level of $30 billion to $15 billion beginning in May 2019, and continue to allow its holdings of Agency MBS to decline, consistent with the aim of holding primarily U.S. Treasury securities in the long run. Beginning in October 2019 principal payments from Agency MBS or agency debt will be reinvested in U.S. Treasury securities subject to a maximum of $20 billion per month, with any principal payments in excess of that maximum reinvested in Agency MBS.

In 2017, policymakers announced that LIBOR will be replaced by 2021. The directive was spurred by the fact that banks are uncomfortable contributing to the LIBOR panel given the shortage of underlying transactions on which to base levels and the liability associated with submitting an unfounded level. LIBOR will be replaced with a new SOFR, a rate based on U.S. repo trading. The new benchmark rate will be based on overnight Treasury General Collateral repo rates. The rate-setting process will be managed and published by the Fed and the Treasury’s Office of Financial Research. Many banks believe that it may take four to five years to complete the transition to SOFR, despite the 2021 deadline. We will monitor the emergence of this new rate carefully as it will likely become the new benchmark for hedges and a range of interest rate investments.

In January 2019, the Trump administration made statements of its plans to work with Congress to overhaul Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and expectations to announce a framework for the development of a policy for comprehensive housing finance reform soon. At this time, however, no decisions have been made on any reform plan.

The scope and nature of the actions the U.S. government or the Fed will ultimately undertake are unknown and will continue to evolve. Although the Trump administration has made statements of its intentions to reform housing finance and tax policy, many of these potential policy changes will require congressional action. In addition, the Fed has made statements regarding additional increases to the Federal Funds Rate in 2019 and beyond.

-43-

Effect on Us

Regulatory developments, movements in interest rates and prepayment rates as well as loan modification programs affect us in many ways, including the following:

Effects on our Assets

A change in or elimination of the guarantee structure of Agency MBS may increase our costs (if, for example, guarantee fees increase) or require us to change our investment strategy altogether. For example, the elimination of the guarantee structure of Agency MBS may cause us to change our investment strategy to focus on non-Agency MBS, which in turn would require us to significantly increase our monitoring of the credit risks of our investments in addition to interest rate and prepayment risks.

Lower long-term interest rates can affect the value of our Agency MBS in a number of ways. If prepayment rates are relatively low (due, in part, to the refinancing problems described above), lower long-term interest rates can increase the value of higher-coupon Agency MBS. This is because investors typically place a premium on assets with yields that are higher than market yields. Although lower long-term interest rates may increase asset values in our portfolio, we may not be able to invest new funds in similarly-yielding assets.

If prepayment levels increase, the value of our Agency MBS affected by such prepayments may decline. This is because a principal prepayment accelerates the effective term of an Agency MBS, which would shorten the period during which an investor would receive above-market returns (assuming the yield on the prepaid asset is higher than market yields). Also, prepayment proceeds may not be able to be reinvested in similar-yielding assets. Agency MBS backed by mortgages with high interest rates are more susceptible to prepayment risk because holders of those mortgages are most likely to refinance to a lower rate. IOs and IIOs, however, may be the types of Agency MBS most sensitive to increased prepayment rates. Because the holder of an IO or IIO receives no principal payments, the values of IOs and IIOs are entirely dependent on the existence of a principal balance on the underlying mortgages. If the principal balance is eliminated due to prepayment, IOs and IIOs essentially become worthless. Although increased prepayment rates can negatively affect the value of our IOs and IIOs, they have the opposite effect on POs. Because POs act like zero-coupon bonds, meaning they are purchased at a discount to their par value and have an effective interest rate based on the discount and the term of the underlying loan, an increase in prepayment rates would reduce the effective term of our POs and accelerate the yields earned on those assets, which would increase our net income.

Higher long-term rates can also affect the value of our Agency MBS. As long-term rates rise, rates available to borrowers also rise. This tends to cause prepayment activity to slow and extend the expected average life of mortgage cash flows. As the expected average life of the mortgage cash flows increases, coupled with higher discount rates, the value of Agency MBS declines. Some of the instruments the Company uses to hedge our Agency MBS assets, such as Euro Dollar futures, swaps, interest rate futures and swaptions, are stable average life instruments. This means that to the extent we use such instruments to hedge our Agency MBS assets, our hedges may not adequately protect us from price declines, and therefore may negatively impact our book value. It is for this reason we use interest only securities in our portfolio. As interest rates rise, the expected average life of these securities increases, causing generally positive price movements as the number and size of the cash flows increase the longer the underlying mortgages remain outstanding. We believe this makes interest only securities desirable hedge instruments for pass-through Agency MBS.

-44-

As the economy has rebounded from the financial crisis, the Fed has taken steps to remove the considerable accommodation that was employed to combat the crisis. At the conclusion of its meeting in September 2017, the Fed announced it would implement caps on the amount of Agency MBS assets it would allow to run off, or not be re-invested, starting in October 2017. Previously the Fed would re-invest all of the principal repayments it received each month on the Agency MBS assets it had acquired during its quantitative easing programs. By capping the amount they would allow to run off each month, the Fed was effectively limiting the amount it would re-invest. Per the Fed’s September 2017 announcement, the cap reached $20 billion per month in October 2018. At the time of the Fed’s announcement in September 2017, its monthly re-investments were approximately $20 billion per month as well, so this implied the Fed would stop, or nearly stop, re-investing its monthly pay-downs beyond October 2018. The purchases each month by the Fed have been a significant source of demand in the Agency MBS market and as it was reduced slowly over the course of 2018 and essentially eliminated beyond October 2018, the removal of this source of demand negatively impacted Agency MBS prices. The extent this negatively impacts the Agency MBS market was a function of the level of supply each month – as the supply/demand balance affects the price of any asset – and whether or not another source of demand was present to replace the Fed. At the conclusion of the March 2019 FOMC meeting, the Fed said that the FOMC intends to slow the pace of the decline in its holdings of U.S. Treasuries and Agency MBS over coming quarters provided that the economy and money market conditions evolve about as expected. The Fed specified that the FOMC intends to reduce the run-off of its holdings of U.S. Treasury securities by reducing the cap on monthly redemptions from the current level of $30 billion to $15 billion beginning in May 2019, and continue to allow its holdings of Agency MBS to decline, consistent with the aim of holding primarily U.S. Treasury securities in the long run. Beginning in October 2019 principal payments from Agency MBS or agency debt were to be reinvested in U.S. Treasury securities subject to a maximum of $20 billion per month, with any principal payments in excess of that maximum reinvested in Agency MBS. The Fed announced at their July 31, 2019 meeting that the end of their balance sheet run-off would be moved up two months to August of 2019.

Because we base our investment decisions on risk management principles rather than anticipated movements in interest rates, in a volatile interest rate environment we may allocate more capital to structured Agency MBS with shorter durations. We believe these securities have a lower sensitivity to changes in long-term interest rates than other asset classes. We may attempt to mitigate our exposure to changes in long-term interest rates by investing in IOs and IIOs, which typically have different sensitivities to changes in long-term interest rates than PT MBS, particularly PT MBS backed by fixed-rate mortgages.

If Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were to modify or end their repurchase programs, our investment portfolio could be negatively impacted.

Effects on our borrowing costs

We leverage our PT MBS portfolio and a portion of our structured Agency MBS with principal balances through the use of short-term repurchase agreement transactions. The interest rates on our debt are determined by market levels of both the Federal Funds Rate and LIBOR. An increase in the Federal Funds Rate or LIBOR would increase our borrowing costs, which could affect our interest rate spread if there is no corresponding increase in the interest we earn on our assets. This would be most prevalent with respect to our Agency MBS backed by fixed rate mortgage loans because the interest rate on a fixed-rate mortgage loan does not change even though market rates may change.

In order to protect our net interest margin against increases in short-term interest rates, we may enter into interest rate swaps, which economically convert our floating-rate repurchase agreement debt to fixed-rate debt, or utilize other hedging instruments such as Eurodollar and T-Note futures contracts or interest rate swaptions.

-45-

Summary

The turn in the outlook for interest rate policy from the Fed was completed during the second quarter of 2019. The multi-year tightening cycle that began in late 2015 ended in December of 2018. After a brief period with a balanced outlook, the Fed lowered the Fed Funds target range at their July 31, 2019 meeting. The Fed and their outlook for policy is now aligned with the other major central banks. The strength of the domestic economy alone does not appear to justify the change in policy, at least not yet. While the manufacturing side of the economy has slowed noticeably from the level observed in 2018, the consumer and consumption side has not. The job market in the U.S. has not generated the gains seen in prior years, but job gains are still above the level needed to reduce excess slack in the economy, to the extent it exists. Instead the Fed is focused on international trade – especially trade between the U.S. and China, the threat of escalating tariffs, a global growth deceleration, especially in China and the EU, a potential no-deal Brexit and fading inflation expectations. The equity markets in the U.S. have performed very well year to date. It appears the markets assume the world’s central banks will intervene in order to sustain the current economic expansion. Shortly after the Fed meeting on July 31, 2019 , trade tensions between the U.S. and China deteriorated further as the administration announced a new round of tariffs on imported Chinese goods that are scheduled to start on September 1, 2019. The Chinese subsequently retaliated and the markets had a severe negative reaction. Going forward, the tug of war between a surprisingly resilient domestic economy and rapidly deteriorating conditions abroad will pull at the Fed, leaving the outlook for monetary policy and rates generally clouded, albeit with an inverted curve reflecting the markets expectation of several future rate cuts.

The Agency MBS market generated a positive 2.0% return for the second quarter, although this return lagged that of comparable duration treasury securities. In the aggregate the Agency MBS sector underperformed comparable duration treasuries by 0.70%. The decline in interest rates stoked fears of increased levels of prepayment activity. With generic loan characteristics of Agency MBS quite poor, coupled with the seasonal peak in prepayment activity, the decline in rates available to borrowers and subsequent surge in production volumes overwhelmed Agency MBS performance. Heightened levels of volatility also negatively impacted performance. Since the end of the second quarter, the rates market appears to have settled into a range and volatility has abated, allowing Agency MBS to do quite well, despite still elevated levels of daily production of new loans/securities.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. GAAP requires our management to make some complex and subjective decisions and assessments. Our most critical accounting policies involve decisions and assessments which could significantly affect reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. There have been no changes to our critical accounting estimates as discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Capital Expenditures

At June 30, 2019, we had no material commitments for capital expenditures.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At June 30, 2019, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Inflation

Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are interest rate sensitive in nature. As a result, interest rates and other factors influence our performance far more so than does inflation. Changes in interest rates do not necessarily correlate with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates. Our activities and balance sheet are measured with reference to historical cost and/or fair market value without considering inflation.

-46-

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report (the “evaluation date”), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded our disclosure controls and procedures, as designed and implemented, were effective as of the evaluation date (1) in ensuring that information regarding the Company and its subsidiaries is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, by our employees, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and (2) in providing reasonable assurance that information we must disclose in our periodic reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by the SEC’s rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

-47-

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not party to any material pending legal proceedings as described in Item 103 of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 20, 2019.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On March 26, 2018, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares of the Company's Class A common stock. The maximum remaining number of shares that may be repurchased under this authorization is 429,596 shares. The authorization expires on November 15, 2019 . The Company did not repurchase any of its common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2019.

The Company did not have any unregistered sales of its equity securities during the three months ended June 30, 2019.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

-48-

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No

3.1	Articles of Amendment and Restatement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form S-11/A, filed with the SEC on April 29, 2004
3.2	Articles Supplementary, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 3, 2005, filed with the SEC on November 8, 2005
3.3	Articles of Amendment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 10, 2006, filed with the SEC on February 15, 2006
3.4	Articles of Amendment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 24, 2007, filed with the SEC on September 24, 2007
3.5	Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 24, 2007, filed with the SEC on September 24, 2007
31.1	Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002*
31.2	Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002*
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**
32.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**

101.INS		Instance Document***
101.SCH		Taxonomy Extension Schema Document***
101.CAL		Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document***
101.DEF		Additional Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document***
101.LAB		Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document***
101.PRE		Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document***

Filed herewith.

Furnished herewith

***

Submitted electronically herewith .

-49-

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

Date: August 9, 2019		By:	/s/ Robert E. Cauley
			Robert E. Cauley Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 9, 2019		By:	/s/ G. Hunter Haas, IV
			G. Hunter Haas, IV President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)