UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒ Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2020
OR
☐ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission File Number 001-14015
APPLIED ENERGETICS,
INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
|
|
77-0262908
|
(State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(IRS
Employer
Identification Number) |
2480 W Ruthrauff
Road, Suite 140 Q |
|
|
Tucson,
Arizona |
|
85705 |
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip
Code) |
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code
(520) 628-7415
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer,
or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”,
“smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer: ☐ |
Accelerated
filer: ☐ |
Non-accelerated
filer: ☐ |
Smaller
reporting company: ☒ |
|
Emerging growth company
☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the exchange act.
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ☐ No ☒
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each
Class |
|
Trading Symbol(s) |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which
Registered |
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per
share |
|
AERG |
|
OTCQB |
As of August 11, 2020, there were 212,143,146 shares of the
issuer's common stock, par value $.001 per share, outstanding.
APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
APPLIED ENERGETICS,
INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
June
30,
2020 |
|
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
446,976 |
|
|
$ |
88,415 |
|
Other
receivable |
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
2,880 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
159,101 |
|
|
|
52,686 |
|
Total current
assets |
|
|
608,956 |
|
|
|
143,981 |
|
Long-term
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
receivable |
|
|
582,377 |
|
|
|
582,377 |
|
Property and
equipment - net |
|
|
28,017 |
|
|
|
36,568 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
1,666,667 |
|
|
|
2,083,334 |
|
Total long-term assets |
|
|
2,277,061 |
|
|
|
2,702,279 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
2,886,017 |
|
|
$ |
2,846,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’
(DEFICIT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable |
|
$ |
422,015 |
|
|
$ |
472,868 |
|
Accrued officer
compensation |
|
|
206,000 |
|
|
|
206,000 |
|
Notes payable including accrued interest of $233,541 at June 30,
2020 and $119,218 at December 31, 2019 |
|
|
3,956,972 |
|
|
|
3,467,890 |
|
Due to related
parties |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Accrued
expenses |
|
|
55,526 |
|
|
|
23,588 |
|
Accrued
dividends |
|
|
48,079 |
|
|
|
48,079 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
66,368 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
4,804,960 |
|
|
|
4,268,425 |
|
Long-term
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes payable |
|
|
1,132,760 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
Total
liabilities |
|
|
5,937,720 |
|
|
|
5,768,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and
contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ (deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, 2,000,000
shares authorized; 13,602 shares issued and outstanding at June 30,
2020 and at December 31, 2019 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Common stock, $.001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized;
212,143,146 and 206,569,063 shares issued and outstanding at June
30, 2020 and at December 31, 2019, respectively |
|
|
212,143 |
|
|
|
206,569 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
|
|
88,412,212 |
|
|
|
85,907,523 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(91,676,072 |
) |
|
|
(89,036,271 |
) |
Total stockholders’ (deficit) |
|
|
(3,051,703 |
) |
|
|
(2,922,165 |
) |
TOTAL LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) |
|
$ |
2,886,017 |
|
|
$ |
2,846,260 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements (unaudited).
APPLIED ENERGETICS,
INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
For the three months ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
$ |
1,128,324 |
|
|
$ |
610,446 |
|
Selling and
marketing |
|
|
71,840 |
|
|
|
53,999 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
65,317 |
|
|
|
95,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating
expenses |
|
|
1,265,481 |
|
|
|
760,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(1,265,481 |
) |
|
|
(760,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (expense) |
|
|
(109,229 |
) |
|
|
(26,485 |
) |
Total other (expense) |
|
|
(109,229 |
) |
|
|
(26,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(1,374,710 |
) |
|
|
(786,820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(8,501 |
) |
|
|
(8,501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(1,383,211 |
) |
|
$ |
(795,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per
common share – basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding, basic and diluted |
|
|
212,319,137 |
|
|
|
203,814,063 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements (unaudited).
APPLIED ENERGETICS,
INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and
administrative |
|
|
2,218,744 |
|
|
|
1,067,165 |
|
Selling and
marketing |
|
|
153,526 |
|
|
|
106,333 |
|
Research and
development |
|
|
122,796 |
|
|
|
168,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating
expenses |
|
|
2,495,066 |
|
|
|
1,342,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(2,485,066 |
) |
|
|
(1,342,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income |
|
|
15,833 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Interest (expense) |
|
|
(170,568 |
) |
|
|
(30,925 |
) |
Total other
income |
|
|
(154,735 |
) |
|
|
(30,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(2,639,801 |
) |
|
|
(1,372,973 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
dividends |
|
|
(17,003 |
) |
|
|
(17,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(2,656,804 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,389,976 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per
common share – basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding, basic and diluted |
|
|
208,765,721 |
|
|
|
204,006,788 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements (unaudited).
APPLIED ENERGETICS,
INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
For the six months ended June 30, 2020
(Unaudited)
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional
Paid-in |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Total
Stockholders' |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Deficit |
|
Balance
as of December 31, 2019 |
|
|
13,602 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
206,569,062 |
|
|
$ |
206,569 |
|
|
$ |
85,907,523 |
|
|
$ |
(89,036,271 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,922,165 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
439,956 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
439,956 |
|
Common stock issued on exercise of stock option and warrant |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Sale of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,710,000 |
|
|
|
3,710 |
|
|
|
1,109,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,113,000 |
|
Net loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2020 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,265,091 |
) |
|
|
(1,265,091 |
) |
Balance as of March 31, 2020 |
|
|
13,602 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
210,304,062 |
|
|
$ |
210,304 |
|
|
$ |
87,458,494 |
|
|
$ |
(90,301,362 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,632,550 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
344,430 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
344,430 |
|
RSA-based non-cash compensation |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
18,750 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
6,508 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,527 |
|
Common stock issued on exercise of stock option and warrant |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
72,450 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
73,500 |
|
Sale of common stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,770,334 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
529,330 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
531,100 |
|
Cancellation of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2020 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,374,710 |
) |
|
|
(1,374,710 |
) |
|
|
|
13,602 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
212,143,146 |
|
|
$ |
212,143 |
|
|
$ |
88,412,212 |
|
|
$ |
(91,676,072 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,051,703 |
) |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements (unaudited).
APPLIED ENERGETICS,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
For the six months ended June 30, 2019
(Unaudited)
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional
Paid-in |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Total Stockholders' |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Deficit |
|
Balance
as of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
13,602 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
201,697,396 |
|
|
$ |
201,697 |
|
|
$ |
82,637,749 |
|
|
$ |
(83,479,931 |
) |
|
$ |
(640,471 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
122,950 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
122,950 |
|
Sale of common stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
147,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Net loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(586,155 |
) |
|
|
(586,155 |
) |
Balance as of March 31, 2019 |
|
|
13,602 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
204,197,396 |
|
|
$ |
204,197 |
|
|
$ |
82,908,199 |
|
|
$ |
(84,066,086 |
) |
|
$ |
(953,676 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
386,318 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
386,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2019 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(786,820 |
) |
|
|
(786,820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2019 |
|
|
13,602 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
204,197,396 |
|
|
$ |
204,197 |
|
|
$ |
83,294,517 |
|
|
$ |
(84,852,906 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,354,178 |
) |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements (unaudited).
APPLIED ENERGETICS,
INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
|
|
(2,639,801 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,372,974 |
) |
Adjustments to
reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash stock based
compensation expense |
|
|
790,913 |
|
|
|
509,268 |
|
Amortization of
future compensation payable |
|
|
416,667 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
8,551 |
|
|
|
6,481 |
|
Amortization of
prepaid expenses |
|
|
98,183 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Interest
expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
30,925 |
|
Changes in
assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable |
|
|
9,888 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other
receivable |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
Customer
deposits |
|
|
66,368 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Prepaids and
deposits |
|
|
(106,422 |
) |
|
|
(17,871 |
) |
Long term
receivables - net |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(141,182 |
) |
Accounts
payable |
|
|
(57,097 |
) |
|
|
(75,200 |
) |
Accrued
interest |
|
|
120,568 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Accrued expenses and compensation |
|
|
31,939 |
|
|
|
(377,855 |
) |
Net
cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(1,260,243 |
) |
|
|
(1,378,408 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes
payable |
|
|
132,760 |
|
|
|
1,150,000 |
|
Proceeds from
issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,644,100 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Repayment on notes
payable |
|
|
(233,306 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants |
|
|
75,250 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,618,804 |
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents |
|
|
358,561 |
|
|
|
(78,408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
88,415 |
|
|
|
178,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
446,976 |
|
|
$ |
100,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow
Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for
interest |
|
$ |
21,869 |
|
|
$ |
1,320 |
|
Cash paid for
taxes |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements (unaudited).
APPLIED ENERGETICS,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30, 2020
(Unaudited)
1. |
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION AND GOING CONCERN |
The
accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of Applied Energetics, Inc. and its
wholly owned subsidiary North Star Power Engineering, Inc. as of
June 30, 2020 (collectively, "company," "Applied Energetics," "we,"
"our" or "us"). All intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
(which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair
presentation of the results for the interim periods presented have
been made. The results for the six-month period ended June 30,
2020, may not be indicative of the results for the entire year. The
interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the company's audited
consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going
concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. For
the six months ended June 30, 2020, the company incurred a net loss
of approximately $2,640,000, had negative cash flows from
operations of $1,260,000 and may incur additional future losses due
to the reduction in government contract activity. Additionally, as
of June 30, 2020, the company had a working capital deficit
(current liabilities less current assets) of $4,196,000. These
matters raise substantial doubt as to the company’s ability to
continue as a going concern. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic
contributes to this uncertainty.
The
company’s existence is dependent upon management’s ability to
develop profitable operations. Management is devoting substantially
all of its efforts to developing its business and raising capital
and there can be no assurance that the company’s efforts will be
successful. No assurance can be given that management’s actions
will result in profitable operations or the resolution of its
liquidity problems. The accompanying consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result should
the company be unable to continue as a going concern for one year
from the date the financials are issued.
In
order to improve the company’s liquidity, the company’s management
is actively pursuing additional equity financing through
discussions with investment bankers and private investors. There
can be no assurance that the company will be successful in its
effort to secure additional equity financing.
The
financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability of assets and the amount or classification of
liabilities that might be necessary should the company be unable to
continue as a going concern.
LIQUIDITY
AND MANAGEMENT’S PLAN
The
accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared on a
going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets
and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.
For the six months ended June 30, 2020, the company incurred a net
loss of approximately $2,640,000, had negative cash flows from
operations of approximately $1,260,000 and conducted financing
activities yielding $1,644,000 in proceeds from the issuance of
common stock, proceeds from notes payable of $133,000, proceeds
from the exercise of options and warrants of $75,000, partially
offset by payments on notes payable of $233,000 and expects to
incur additional future losses due to the reactivation of its
business activities. These matters raise substantial doubt as to
the company’s ability to continue as a going concern unless the
company is able to obtain additional financing for its continuing
operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments
relating to the recoverability of assets and the amount or
classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the
company be unable to continue as a going concern.
As of
June 30, 2020, the company had approximately $447,000 in cash and
cash equivalents.
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30, 2020
(Unaudited)
USE
OF ESTIMATES
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with
United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”)
requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Management bases its assumptions on historical
experiences and on various other estimates that it believes to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the
basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. In
addition, management considers the basis and methodology used in
developing and selecting these estimates, the trends in and amounts
of these estimates, specific matters affecting the amount of and
changes in these estimates, and any other relevant matters related
to these estimates, including significant issues concerning
accounting principles and financial statement presentation. Such
estimates and assumptions could change in the future, as more
information becomes known which could materially impact the amounts
reported and disclosed herein. Significant estimates include
measurements of income tax assets and liabilities.
Multiple
contract proposals have been submitted to various government
agencies in 2019 and 2020. Due to the COVID-19-related closures of
multiple agencies and work-from-home orders across various regions
of the United States, we anticipate that reviews and funding
decisions on these proposals might be delayed longer than
anticipated as resources are focused on other matters within the
government.
REVENUE
RECOGNITION
A
majority of revenue under long-term government contracts is
recorded under the percentage of completion method. Revenue,
billable monthly under cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts, is recorded
as costs are incurred and includes estimated earned fees in the
proportion that costs incurred to date bear to total estimated
costs. Costs include direct labor, direct materials, subcontractor
costs and manufacturing and administrative overhead allowable under
the contract. General and administrative expenses allowable under
the terms of contracts are allocated per contract, depending on its
direct labor and material proportion to total direct labor and
material of all contracts. As contracts can extend over one or more
accounting periods, revisions in earnings estimated during the
course of work are reflected during the accounting period in which
the facts become known. When the current contract estimate
indicates a loss, a provision is made for the total anticipated
loss in the current period. We do not generally provide an
allowance for returns from our government customers because our
customer agreements do not provide for a right of
return.
Revenue
for other products and services is recognized when such products
and services are delivered or performed and, in connection with
certain sales to government agencies, when the products and
services are accepted, which is normally negotiated as part of the
initial contract. Revenue from commercial, non-governmental,
customers is based on fixed price contracts where the sale is
recognized upon acceptance of the product or performance of the
service and when payment is probable. Contract costs are deferred
in the same manner as inventory costs and are charged to operations
as the related revenue from contracts is recognized. When a current
contract estimate indicates a loss, a provision is made for the
total anticipated loss in the period in which such facts become
evident.
DEFERRED REVENUE
Deferred revenue represents customer deposits on a project
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The
company has reviewed issued accounting pronouncements and plans to
adopt those that are applicable to it. The company does not expect
the adoption of any other pronouncements to have an impact on its
results of operations or financial position.
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30, 2020
(Unaudited)
2. |
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION |
Share-Based
Compensation
For the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, share-based
compensation expense totaled approximately $791,000 and $509,000,
respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019,
share-based compensation expense totaled approximately $351,000 and
$272,000, respectively.
We
determine the fair value of option grant share-based awards at
their grant date, using a Black-Scholes-Merton Option-Pricing Model
applying the assumptions in the following table:
|
|
six
months ended June 30 |
|
|
2020 |
|
2019 |
|
Expected life (years) |
|
N/A |
|
|
5.50-6.75 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
N/A |
|
|
- |
|
Expected volatility |
|
N/A |
|
|
232 |
% |
Risk free interest rates |
|
N/A |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
Weighted average fair value of options at grant date |
|
N/A |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
For
the six months ended June 30, 2020, options to purchase 900,000
shares of common stock were exercised, no options to purchase stock
were granted, no options were forfeited or expired, and no
restricted stock awards were granted; no restricted stock units
were granted, vested or forfeited. At June 30, 2020, options to
purchase 30,500,000 shares of common stock were outstanding with a
weighted average exercise price of $0.147, a weighted average
remaining contract term of approximately 6.1 years with an
aggregate intrinsic value of $4,484,000. At June 30, 2020, options
to purchase 22,075,000 shares of common stock were
exercisable.
As of
June 30, 2020, there was approximately $1,259,000 of unrecognized
compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted and
outstanding, net of estimated forfeitures. The cost is expected to
be recognized on a weighted average basis over a period of
approximately two years.
Basic
net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss
available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period before giving effect to
stock options, stock warrants, restricted stock agreements,
restricted stock units and convertible securities outstanding,
which are considered to be dilutive common stock equivalents.
Diluted net loss per common share is calculated based on the
weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive shares
outstanding during the period after giving effect to convertible
preferred stock, stock options, warrants and restricted stock
units. Contingently issuable shares are included in the computation
of basic loss per share when issuance of the shares is no longer
contingent. Due to the losses from continuing operations for the
three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, basic and diluted loss
per common share were the same, as the effect of potentially
dilutive securities would have been anti-dilutive.
Potentially
dilutive securities not included in the diluted loss per share
calculation, due to net losses from continuing operations, were as
follows:
|
|
Six
months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase common
shares |
|
|
30,500,000 |
|
|
|
32,750,000 |
|
Warrants to purchase common
shares |
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
950,000 |
|
Unvested restricted stock
agreements |
|
|
31,250 |
|
|
|
68,750 |
|
Convertible
preferred stock |
|
|
48,174 |
|
|
|
44,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total potentially
dilutive securities |
|
|
34,079,424 |
|
|
|
33,813,382 |
|
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30, 2020
(Unaudited)
Dividends
on Preferred Stock are accrued when the amount and kind of dividend
is determined and are payable quarterly on the first day of
February, May, August and November, in cash or shares of common
stock. The holders of shares of Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock are entitled to receive dividends at the initial rate of 6.5%
of the liquidation preference per share (the "Initial Dividend
Rate"), payable, at the option of the corporation, in (i) cash,
(ii) shares of our common stock (valued for such purpose at 95% of
the weighted average of the last sales prices of our common stock
for each of the trading days in the ten trading day period ending
on the third trading day prior to the applicable dividend payment
date) provided that the issuance and/or resale of all such shares
of our common stock are then covered by an effective registration
statement or (iii) any combination of the foregoing. If the company
fails to pay dividends in the five business days following a
dividend payment date (a "Payment Default"), the dividend rate
shall immediately and automatically increase to 7.5% of the
liquidation preference per share for as long as such Payment
Default continues (or return to the Initial Dividend Rate at such
time as such Payment Default no longer continues), and if a Payment
Default shall occur on two consecutive Dividend Payment Dates, the
dividend rate shall immediately and automatically increase to 10%
of the Liquidation Preference for as long as such Payment Default
continues and shall immediately and automatically return to the
Initial Dividend Rate at such time as the Payment Default is no
longer continuing.
As of
June 30, 2020, we had 13,602 shares of our 6.5% Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding. The company has not paid
the dividends commencing with the quarterly dividend due August 1,
2013. Dividend arrearages as of June 30, 2020 was approximately
$238,000. Our Board of Directors suspended the declaration of the
dividend, commencing with the dividend payable as of February 1,
2015 since we did not have a surplus (as such term is defined in
the Delaware General Corporation Law) as of December 31, 2014,
until such time as we have a surplus or net profits for a fiscal
year. Our Series A Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of
$25.00 per Share.
Other
assets primarily represents prepaid assets for insurance premiums
and deposits with attorneys as well as the current portion of
deferred compensation.
In
our litigation, the company was required to place a bond with a
surety. The company does not have access to these funds and it is
out of our control to use them (refer note 11).
Deferred
compensation represents the remaining amortization of the note
payable issued in the acquisition of Applied Optical
Sciences.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2020, the company entered into a
premium financing agreement to finance its director and officer
insurance policy. The principal is approximately $108,000, with
nine monthly payments of $12,498 and an interest rate of 9.7%. The
balance at June 30, 2020 is $60,000 included in current notes
payable.
On
April 28, 2020, the Company entered into a loan agreement with
Alliance Bank of Arizona, N.A. for a loan in the amount of $133,000
pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) under the
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act enacted on March
27, 2020 (the “CARES Act”). This loan is evidenced by a promissory
note dated April 27, 2020 and matures two years from the
disbursement date. This loan bears interest at a rate of 1.00% per
annum, with the first six months of interest deferred. Principal
and interest are payable monthly commencing six months after the
disbursement date and may be prepaid by the Company at any time
prior to maturity with no prepayment penalties. This loan contains
customary events of default relating to, among other things,
payment defaults or breaches of the terms of the loan. Upon the
occurrence of an event of default, the lender may require immediate
repayment of all amounts outstanding under the note.
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30, 2020
(Unaudited)
Following the end of the quarter, in July and August, 2020, we
received $4,049,000 in bridge funding pursuant to 10% Convertible
Promissory Notes. These notes are convertible into shares of our
common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per share, as
negotiated with the holders based on the prevailing market price of
the common stock leading up to the issuance of the notes. At any
time after October 15, 2020 until July 15, 2021, the date of
maturity, (i) each investor may elect to convert these notes into
shares of our common stock, at a conversion price of $0.30 per
share and (ii) the company may elect to prepay, either in cash or
in shares of common stock at a price of $0.30 per share, at the
option of the holder, the amount of principal and interest then
outstanding under each note. In the event we elect to prepay the
notes, we will notify the holders, each of whom will then have five
business days to notify the company if they prefer to receive such
prepayment in cash or stock. These notes are payable in full at
maturity. In lieu of repayment of the principal and interest on the
notes at maturity, the Company may elect to convert the amounts due
into shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.15 per share.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2019, the company received $1,150,000
from eight non-affiliated individuals based on 10% promissory
notes. The notes mature September 1, 2019. The notes are
accompanied by a Common Stock Purchase Warrant entitling the holder
to purchase one share of the company’s common stock, par value
$0.001 per share, for each $2.00 of Note principle, at an exercise
price of $0.07 per share, for two years from the date of
issuance.
The
following reconciles notes payable as of June 30, 2020 and December
31, 2019:
|
|
June 30,
2020 |
|
|
December 31,
2019 |
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
5,175,154 |
|
|
$ |
4,934,329 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
233,541 |
|
|
|
119,218 |
|
Payments on
notes payable |
|
|
(318,963 |
) |
|
|
(85,657 |
) |
Total |
|
|
5,089,732 |
|
|
|
4,967,890 |
|
Less-Notes
payable - current |
|
|
(3,956,972 |
) |
|
|
(3,467,890 |
) |
Notes payable -
non-current |
|
$ |
1,132,760 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
Of the notes payable at June 30, 2020, $1,099,000 were due
September 1, 2019, $1,297,000 were due December 1, 2019, $60,000,
payable monthly over eight monthly payments, is due December 12,
2020, $133,000 were due April 28, 2022 and $2,500,000 is payable in
$500,000 semi-annual payments is due May 24, 2022. The notes due on
September 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019 have an interest rate of
10%, the note due on December 12, 2020 has an interest rate of
9.7%, the note due on April 28, 2022 has an interest rate of 1.0%
and the note due on May 24, 2022 has interest rate of 0%. All notes
are unsecured and not convertible. Interest expense on these notes
was $55,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2020 and $19,000 for the
quarter ended June 30, 2019. Interest expense on these notes was
$121,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and $31,000 for the
six months ended June 30, 2019. Interest expense includes a $50,000
penalty interest for not making the first $500,000 payment on the
note payable for the AOS acquisition.
9. |
DUE
TO RELATED PARTIES |
It came to the board’s attention that on July 31, 2018, our now
deceased CEO deposited $50,000 into the company’s account. Although
it has been suggested that the funds may have been intended for use
toward Mr. Dearmin’s healthcare, the board does not know for
certain what the purpose of the funds were or the nature of any
intended investment. Accordingly, the board is investigating the
appropriate disposition of the funds which will likely be to the
estate of Mr. Dearmin. Until such a determination is made, the
board does not intend to use these funds for any corporate purpose.
For reporting purposes, the company has treated the deposit as a
Due to related parties as reported on the balance sheet.
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30, 2020
(Unaudited)
On
January 13, 2020, the company received $45,000 from an individual
based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the
company issued 150,000 shares of its common stock.
On
January 13, 2020, the company received $60,000 from two individuals
based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the
company issued 200,000 shares of its common stock.
On
January 15, 2020, the company received $30,000 from two individuals
based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the
company issued 100,000 shares of its common stock
On
January 22, 2020, the company received $204,000 from an individual
based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the
company issued 680,000 shares of its common stock.
On
January 23, 2020, the company received $204,000 from an individual
based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the
company issued 680,000 shares of its common stock.
On
January 24, 2020, the company received $60,000 from an individual
based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the
company issued 200,000 shares of its common stock.
On
January 30, 2020, the company received $1,750 from an individual
based on the exercise of a warrant for which the company issued
25,000 shares of its common stock.
On
February 19, 2020, the company received $510,000 from an individual
based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the
company issued 1,700,000 shares of its common stock.
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, 2,000,000
shares authorized; 13,602 shares issued and outstanding at June 30,
2020 and at December 31, 2019.
The $351,000 stock-based compensation for the quarter ended June
30, 2020 was comprised of $177,000 option expense and $167,000 was
the amortization of 5,000,000 shares of stock valued at $0.4014
over three years for the acquisition of Applied Optical Sciences as
well as the recognition of $7,000 for the restricted stock
agreements, partially offset by a reversal of $1,000 for the
cancellation of 1,000,000 shares.
On
April 8, 2020, the company received $11,000 from an individual
based on a warrant exercise for which the company issued 150,000
shares of its common stock.
On
April 8, 2020, the company received $63,000 from an individual
based on an option exercise for which the company issued 900,000
shares of its common stock.
On
April 8, 2020, the company received $60,000 from an individual
based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the
company issued 200,000 shares of its common stock.
On
April 23, 2020, the company received $71,000 from an individual
based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the
company issued 237,000 shares of its common stock.
On
April 29, 2020, the company received $400,000 from an individual
based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the
company issued 1,333,333 shares of its common stock.
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30, 2020
(Unaudited)
We have entered into a Mutual Release and Hold Harmless Agreement
with a stockholder resolving claims related to the issuance of
1,000,000 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share,
to that stockholder, as directed by prior company CEO George
Farley, as compensation for valuation services. The shares have
been returned and cancelled.
In June 2020, we issued 18,750 shares of common stock based on a
restricted stock agreement with a contractor. The closing price of
our common stock on grant date was $0.35 a share.
During
January 2019, the company received $150,000 from three individuals
based on subscription agreements with the company for which the
company issued 2,500,000 shares of its common stock.
11.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As
previously reported, on July 3, 2018, we commenced a lawsuit in the
Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against the company’s
former director and principal executive officer George Farley and
AnneMarieCo LLC (“AMC”).
The
lawsuit alleges to the following six causes of action:
|
1. |
Breach
of Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty against George Farley |
|
2. |
Breach
of Fiduciary Duty of Care against George Farley |
|
3. |
Aiding
and Abetting Breach of Fiduciary Duty against AMC |
|
4. |
Conversion
against George Farley |
|
5. |
Fraudulent
Transfer against George Farley and AMC |
|
6. |
Injunctive
Relief against George Farley and AMC |
This
report provides an update on the progress of the
litigation.
In
connection with the lawsuit, the company requested a temporary
restraining order prohibiting Mr. Farley and AMC from selling their
25 million shares of the company’s common stock which the company
alleges were improperly issued. On July 20, 2018, the Delaware
Court of Chancery, Vice Chancellor Tamika Montgomery-Reeves
presiding, entered a “status quo” order upon the stipulation of the
parties, whereby Mr. Farley and AMC agreed not to transfer,
alienate or sell any of their shares pending a ruling on the
company’s motion for a preliminary injunction.
On
July 26, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered a scheduling
order setting dates and deadlines for, among other matters, a
hearing and briefing schedule on the amount of the bond the company
would be required to post to maintain the “status quo” order
through the preliminary injunction hearing, a hearing and briefing
schedule on the motion for a preliminary injunction, and a
discovery schedule.
Also,
in connection with the lawsuit, on August 8, 2018, the company
filed a motion to disqualify Mr. Farley’s attorney, Ryan Whalen,
who had previously represented the company.
On
August 14, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order
requiring the company to post a bond in the total amount of
$200,446.52. On August 21, 2018, the company posted the bond via
Atlantic Specialty Insurance company acting as surety. Pursuant to
the contract between the company and Atlantic Specialty Insurance
company, the company deposited $200,446.52 in cash as collateral
for the surety agreement.
On
August 23, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery court extended the
hearing date on the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction
to October 23, 2018, and simultaneously ordered an increase in the
bond amount of $55,446.52. On August 30, 2018, the company posted
the increased bond amount, again with Atlantic Specialty Insurance
Company acting as surety, and deposited the additional $55,446.52
in cash with the surety.
On
September 7, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered an order
setting a briefing schedule on the company’s motion to disqualify
Mr. Whalen.
On
September 10, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered an order
governing the production and exchange of confidential documents and
information among the parties in discovery.
In
another Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 13, 2018, the
company updated the status of the litigation to include events that
occurred up to that date. This report further updates the progress
of the litigation.
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30, 2020
(Unaudited)
On
October 16, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered a
scheduling order continuing the hearing date on the company’s
motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants George
Farley and AMC to December 14, 2018.
The
October 16, 2018 order also required the company to increase its
bond amount by an additional $185,301.86 ($80,301.86 for AMC and
$105,000.00 for Mr. Farley) to account for the continued hearing
date. On October 24, 2018, the company posted the additional bond
amount of $185,301.86.
On
October 16, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order
denying the company’s motion to disqualify Mr. Whalen.
On
January 23, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a
Memorandum Opinion, granting a preliminary injunction prohibiting
Mr. Farley and AMC from selling their 25 million shares of the
company’s common stock, which the company alleges were improperly
issued. On January 24, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued
a revised Memorandum Opinion correcting calculations regarding the
increased bond amount.
In
granting the preliminary injunction, the Court found that the
company met “its considerable burden” of demonstrating it was
likely to win its lawsuit against Mr. Farley and AMC. Specifically,
the Court found it was “reasonably probable” Mr. Farley had
unlawfully issued the 25 million shares without proper
authorization, Mr. Farley had breached his duty of loyalty to the
company, Mr. Farley was unlikely to prove the stock issuance was
procedurally or substantively “fair” to the company, and Mr. Farley
had fraudulently transferred 20 million of the shares to AMC.
Finally, the Court ruled because Farley and AMC’s 25 million shares
represented approximately one eighth of the company’s outstanding
ownership, the injunction was necessary to protect the company’s
capital structure, ability to attract new investors, ability to
raise new capital and continue deployment of its plans now underway
to revitalize its business.
In
its Memorandum Opinion, the Court also required that the company
post additional bond money, bringing the total cash collateral for
the surety agreement to $582,377.26. The company posted the
additional bond amount, and deposited the additional cash amount
with the surety, on January 29, 2019.
On
March 4, 2019, the company filed an amended complaint adding claims
against Mr. Farley concerning loans Mr. Farley caused the company
take from PowerUp Lending Group Ltd. and Auctus Fund LLC from
September 2017 through March 2018. Mr. Farley responded to the
amended complaint by filing a motion to dismiss the lawsuit based
on Delaware Court of Chancery Rules 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(7). On
September 28, 2019, the Delaware Chancery Court denied this
motion.
On
July 7, 2019, the company filed a motion to reduce or eliminate the
cash bond requirement. As previously reported, the cash bond was
required by the Delaware Chancery Court. On September 30, 2019, the
Delaware Chancery Court denied the motion.
On
July 19, 2019, Mr. Farley and AMC filed answers and amended counter
claims in response to the Company’s amended complaint. The amended
counter claims add claims under Delaware General Corporate Law
section 205, seeking to validate the stock issuances at issue in
the litigation.
On
July 29, 2019, the Delaware Chancery Court entered a scheduling
order which, among other deadlines, rescheduled the trial date to
begin on January 21, 2020. However, the judge presiding in the
case, Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves, was subsequently appointed
and confirmed to the Delaware Supreme Court.
The
case was reassigned to Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster. On January
14, 2020, Vice Chancellor Laster held a scheduling conference. On
January 29, 2020, the Delaware Chancery Court entered a scheduling
order setting the trial date for July 20, 2020. On June 2, 2020,
the Delaware Chancery Court issued a scheduling order setting dates
for pre-trial motion practice, hearings and conferences leading up
to a trial date of September 21-24, 2020.
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30, 2020
(Unaudited)
On
September 26, 2019, the company filed a motion for partial summary
judgment concerning the issuance of company stock to Mr. Farley
without having been authorized by a quorum of the board of
directors. The previous hearing date of November 20, 2019, was
postponed while the case awaited a new judge assignment. The motion
was heard on July 23, 2020, by Vice Chancellor Laster.
On
August 3, 2020, in our ongoing litigation against George Farley,
the company’s former CEO, and AnneMarieCo., LLC, the Chancery Court
of the State of Delaware issued an Opinion granting in part and
denying in part the company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
The Court granted the company’s motion in the following respect:
“Farley could not validly take action as the sole remaining
director between February 10, 2016, and March 9, 2018. The stock
that he issued to himself is invalid, as is the compensation that
he attempted to grant to himself. The shares that he gifted to
AnneMarieCo remain invalid, notwithstanding their transfer to
AnneMarieCo.” The court denied the motion in all other respects,
rejecting the company’s argument that Section 205 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law is unavailable for the defendants to
petition the court cure the invalidity of the stock and
compensation, leaving open the possibility for the court to
reinstate the shares and/or compensation in whole or in part under
Section 205. The trial is now scheduled for September 21-23,
2020.
In a
related matter, on February 8, 2019, the company filed a complaint
against Stein Riso Mantel McDonough, LLP (“Stein Riso”), its former
counsel, in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York alleging the following:
|
1. |
breach
of fiduciary duty; |
|
3. |
aiding
and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty; |
|
4. |
voidance
of fees under New York Rules of Professional Conduct
1.8; |
|
5. |
violation
of New York Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5; |
|
7. |
breach
of contract; and |
The
complaint against Stein Riso followed the issuance, on January 23,
2019, of a Memorandum Opinion granting the company’s motion for a
preliminary injunction by the Delaware Court of Chancery in the
case against George Farley and AMC. Stein Riso has responded to the
complaint by filing a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The company amended its
complaint in response. On July 31, 2019, Stein Riso responded to
the company’s amended complaint by filing another motion to dismiss
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The company
filed an opposition to this motion on August 14, 2019. Stein Riso
filed a reply brief on September 13, 2019.
On
May 31, 2020, the United States District Court issued an opinion
and order denying in part and granting in part the motion of Stein
Riso to dismiss the company’s complaint. The court rejected Stein
Riso’s arguments that the allegations in the company’s complaint
did not adequately allege Stein Riso committed malpractice and
aided and abetted breaches of fiduciary duties by George Farley,
the company’s former CEO and the defendant in a related action in
the Delaware Chancery Court. The court dismissed a separate cause
of action which the company had pled for “rescission and
restitution” for Stein Riso’s alleged violations of the New York
Rules of Professional Conduct, finding it was “duplicative” of our
professional malpractice cause of action. The court also dismissed
the company’s cause of action against Stein Riso for securities
fraud.
On
June 25, 2020, the United States District Court issued a civil case
management plan and scheduling order. On July 24, 2020, the company
filed a motion to amend its complaint to add Dennis Stein and Ivan
Dreyer, individual attorneys at Stein Riso, as defendants. The
United States District Court has ordered the parties to appear at a
mediation on August 13, 2020.
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30, 2020
(Unaudited)
On
July 3, 2019, Gusrae, Kaplan & Nusbaum and its partner, Ryan
Whalen, counsel for defendants, George Farley and AnneMarie Co.
LLC, in the litigation brought by the company and pending in
Delaware, filed a claim in the District Court for the Southern
District of New York against the company its directors, officers,
attorneys and a consultant. The action alleges libel, securities
fraud and related claims. The company believes that this suit lacks
merit and intends to dispute these allegations. The company filed a
motion to dismiss the complaint on October 24, 2019. On December
13, 2019, Gusrae Kaplan and Mr. Whalen filed an opposition to the
Company’s motion. On January 10, 2020, the company filed a reply
brief. The United States District Court has not yet ruled on the
motion.
As
with any litigation, the company cannot predict the outcome with
certainty, but the company expects to provide further updates on
the status of the litigation as circumstances warrant.
We
may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings arising
from the normal course of business.
Following the end of the quarter, in July and August, 2020, we
received $4,049,000 in bridge funding pursuant to 10% Convertible
Promissory Notes. These notes are convertible into shares of our
common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per share, as
negotiated with the holders based on the prevailing market price of
the common stock leading up to the issuance of the notes. At any
time after October 15, 2020 until July 15, 2021, the date of
maturity, (i) each investor may elect to convert these notes into
shares of our common stock, at a conversion price of $0.30 per
share and (ii) the company may elect to prepay, either in cash or
in shares of common stock at a price of $0.30 per share, at the
option of the holder, the amount of principal and interest then
outstanding under each note. In the event we elect to prepay the
notes, we will notify the holders, each of whom will then have five
business days to notify the company if they prefer to receive such
prepayment in cash or stock. These notes are payable in full at
maturity. In lieu of repayment of the principal and interest on the
notes at maturity, the Company may elect to convert the amounts due
into shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.15 per share.
The
company’s management has evaluated subsequent events occurring
after June 30, 2020, the date of our most recent balance sheet,
through the date our financial statements were issued.
ITEM
2. |
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS |
Our
discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and the related
disclosures included elsewhere herein and in the Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2019 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 31, 2020.
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain
statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the securities
laws. Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not
relate solely to the historical or current facts and can be
identified by the use of forward-looking words such as "may",
"believe", "will", “would”, “could”, “should”, "expect", "project",
"anticipate", “estimates", “possible”, "plan", "strategy",
"target", "prospect" or "continue" and other similar terms and
phrases. These forward-looking statements are based on the current
plans and expectations of our management and are subject to a
number of uncertainties and risks that could significantly affect
our current plans and expectations, as well as future results of
operations and financial condition and may cause our actual
results, performance or achievements to be materially different
from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors that
could cause our actual results to differ materially from our
expectations are described in Item 1A (Risk Factors) of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2019. Although
we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking
statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such
expectations will prove to have been correct. We do not assume any
obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect
actual results, changes in assumptions, or changes in other factors
affecting such forward-looking statements.
Applied
Energetics, Inc., (the “Company”) is a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. Our executive
office is located at 2480 W Ruthrauff Road, Suite 140 Q, Tucson,
Arizona, 85705; (520) 628-7415. www.aergs.com
Applied
Energetics, Inc., specializes in the development and manufacture of
advanced high-performance lasers, high voltage electronics,
advanced optical systems, and integrated guided energy systems for
defense, aerospace, industrial, and scientific customers
worldwide.
Technology
and Patents
AERG
has developed, successfully demonstrated and holds all crucial
intellectual property rights to a dynamic Directed Energy
technology called Laser Guided Energy (“LGETM”) and
Laser Induced Plasma Channel (“LIPCTM”). LGE and LIPC
are technologies that can be used in a new generation of high-tech
weapons. The Department of Defense (DOD) previously recognized two
key types of Directed Energy Weapon (“DEW”) technologies, High
Energy Lasers (“HEL”), and High-Power Microwave (“HPM”). Neither
HEL nor HPM is owned by a single entity. The DOD then designated a
third DEW technology, LGE. Applied Energetics’s LGE and LIPC
technologies are wholly owned by Applied Energetics and patent
protected with 26 current patents and an additional 11 Government
Sensitive Patent Applications (“GSPA”). These GSPA’s are held under
secrecy orders of the US government and allow the company greatly
extended protection rights.
Applied
Energetics technology is vastly different from conventional
directed energy weapons, i.e. HEL, and HPM. LGE uses Ultra-Short
Pulse (USP) laser technology to combine the speed and precision of
lasers with the overwhelming impact on targeted threats with
high-voltage electricity. This unique directed energy solution
allows extremely high peak power and energy, with target and
effects tenability, and is effective against a wide variety of
potential targets. A key element of LGE is its novel ability to
offer selectable and tunable properties that can help protect
non-combatants and combat zone infrastructure.
As
Applied Energetics moves toward the future, our corporate strategic
roadmap builds upon the significant value of the company’s USP
capabilities and key intellectual property, including LGE and LIPC,
to offer our prospective partners, co-developers and system
integrators a variety of next-generation Ultra Short-Pulse and
frequency-agile optical sources from the ultraviolet to the far
infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum to address
numerous challenges within the military, medical device, and
advanced manufacturing market sectors.
Key
Relationships and Business Development
Gregory
Quarles joined Applied Energetics, to serve as its Chief Executive
Officer and a member of the board of directors, effective May 6,
2019. He leads the company in its development of next generation
advanced defense technologies based on compact ultra-short pulse
optical systems and laser guided energy. Dr. Quarles is an
experienced CEO, board member and renowned physicist with over 30
years of experience driving cutting-edge laser, optics, and
photonics technology development and operations within advanced
industrial companies. Additionally, Dr. Quarles is a globally
recognized leader for his strategic partnerships with the
Department of Defense and his innovative work in the progression of
global materials research, specifically developing new laser and
integrated photonic devices for a variety of military, medical, and
industrial applications.
Pursuant to a Consulting Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2019, with
SWM Consulting, LLC, an entity owned by Stephen W. McCahon. Dr.
McCahon serves as our Chief Scientist. This relationship gives us
the technical and industry knowhow to utilize the company’s
intellectual property in the development of a next generation of
Ultra-Short Pulse Lasers. The Consulting Agreement provides for a
combination of cash and equity compensation, as we have previously
disclosed, for which Dr. McCahon leads Applied Energetics’
scientific efforts including: leading the scientific team,
developing new intellectual property, assisting with business
development, transferring legacy knowledge to new team members,
recruiting and training talent, working with executives on
corporate strategy, assisting in budget development for R&D,
meeting with clients on technical concepts, attending conferences,
and producing thought leadership for the company. Dr. McCahon works
closely with Dr. Quarles on the company’s research and development
activities and in the proposal and fulfilment of research and
development contracts for branches of the Department of Defense,
agencies of the federal government and other defense contractors
and in other internal research and development activities relating
to lasers and advanced optical sources.
We have also reorganized the company’s Scientific Advisory Board
and, effective April 30, 2019, AERG entered into a Scientific
Advisory Board Agreement with Charles Hale. This agreement provides
for Mr. Hale’s service on the Scientific Advisory Board for
compensation consisting of a non-qualified stock option to purchase
1,500,000 shares of Company’s common stock at an exercise price
equal to $0.369 per share. The option is subject to vesting
annually over three years with the first installment twelve months
from the date of the agreement. The option expires ten (10) years
from the date of the Agreement. Prior to entering into the
agreement, Applied Energetics and Mr. Hale agreed that he would
forfeit options to purchase 1,500,000 shares at an exercise price
of $0.25 per share which had been granted under his prior
Consulting Agreement.
Pursuant to our July 16, 2018, Master Services Agreement, Westpark
Advisors, LLC assists the company in its comprehensive sales and
marketing strategy for the greater Washington DC area and broader
Department of Defense markets. Westpark Advisors focuses on the
company’s next generation USP laser technologies, along with Laser
Guided Energy and the company’s other novel laser technologies and
is to provide business development, program management and strategy
consulting services, including sales and marketing of the company’s
product line. Westpark Advisors’ Managing Director, Patrick
Williams provides full-time support to the company under this
agreement.
Under our February 15, 2019, Consulting and Advisory Services
Agreement, WCCventures, LLC provides advice and guidance to
management including business strategy, marketing and capital
needs.
AERG also retains corporate communications firm Cameron Associates
(“CA”), to provide investor relations services on behalf of the
company including counselling, management on appropriate investor
communications, preparing and distributing press releases and other
public documents, orchestrating conference calls and responding to
investor inquiries.
Effective
April 29, 2019, AERG. established its Board of Advisors and
appointed Christopher Donaghey as its first member. Chris Donaghey
currently serves as the senior vice president and head of corporate
development for Science Applications International Corporation
(“SAIC”), a $6.5 billion revenue defense and government agency
technology integrator. As an executive of SAIC, Donaghey works
closely with SAIC’s senior management to support the development
and implementation of SAIC’s strategic plan with an emphasis on
M&A to complement organic growth strategies and value creation.
In his role on Applied Energetics’ Board of Advisors, Mr. Donaghey
has significant input into the strategic direction of the company
and provides assistance in building lasting relationships in our
defense markets.
Recent
Developments
As of March 4, 2020, AERG executed a contract agreement having a
value of $165,919.77 with the US Army under their STTR program for
a 90-day Phase 1 research program to investigate Standoff
Electronic Denial systems using ultrashort pulse lasers. The Army
anticipates funding one (1) STTR Phase II for each of seven (7)
“special topics” and Phase II contracts are limited to a maximum of
$1,100,000 over a period between 6 and 18 months.
Sequential/Subsequent Phase II funding, as well as non-SBIR/STTR
funding, may also be available. The final report for this Phase I
contract was submitted on July 3, 2020 and the US Army subsequently
accepted the Phase I Final Report and invited AERG to participate
in the Phase II process through the submission of a Phase II
proposal no later than August 11, 2020. The Applied Energetics
Phase II STTR proposal was submitted and accepted on August 10,
2020, and we await the review of this proposed technological
advance for the US Army Standoff Electronic Denial topic.
On
April 28, 2020 AERG was awarded a loan for $132,760 through the
Small Business Administration (SBA) Paycheck Protection Program
(PPP). The terms of this loan were twenty four months with a 1%
annual interest rate. These funds were issued to cover payroll
costs over 8 weeks of May and June 2020. Through the utilization of
this PPP loan, AERG was able to keep all employees fully engaged
during these two months of the pandemic. Our strategy is to follow
the guidelines set forth by the SBA on the PPP program which will
allow AERG to apply for a waiver of the loan because of this full
employment retention, and have the loan convert to a
grant.
Multiple
proposals have been submitted to various government agencies in
2019 and 2020. Due to the closures of multiple agencies and
work-from-home orders across various regions of the United States,
we anticipate that reviews and funding decisions on these proposals
might be delayed longer than anticipated as resources are focused
on other matters within the government.
On
August 3, 2020, in our ongoing litigation against George Farley,
the company’s former CEO, and AnneMarieCo., LLC, the Chancery Court
of the State of Delaware issued an Opinion granting in part and
denying in part the company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
The Court granted the company’s motion in the following respect:
“Farley could not validly take action as the sole remaining
director between February 10, 2016, and March 9, 2018. The stock
that he issued to himself is invalid, as is the compensation that
he attempted to grant to himself. The shares that he gifted to
AnneMarieCo remain invalid, notwithstanding their transfer to
AnneMarieCo.” The court denied the motion in all other respects,
rejecting the company’s argument that Section 205 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law is unavailable for the defendants to
petition the court cure the invalidity of the stock and
compensation, leaving open the possibility for the court to
reinstate the shares and/or compensation in whole or in part under
Section 205. Following assignment of a new vice chancellor in the
case, we were awaiting a July 20, 2020 trial date based on the
Delaware Chancery’s January 29, 2020 scheduling order. However,
because of delays due to the Coronavirus, the trial is now
scheduled for September 21-23, 2020. We cannot be certain whether
the Coronavirus will further affect the timing of the trial. For a
more detailed discussion of this litigation, see “Legal
Proceedings” elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
Path
Forward
We believe that USP optical sources, LGE and LIPC are the
cornerstone to AERG’s future and remain the key areas of our
R&D focus for the near term. We plan to continue building our
management team with highly qualified individuals, including
possibly an additional director. We also intend to recruit
additional personnel, including in the areas of R&D, marketing
and finance. We have worked to align key innovations with our
roadmap to encourage and enable internal filing for a broad,
strategic and robust portfolio of IP and continue surveying the
literature for acquisitions of parallel IP to that end. We also
intend to pursue strategic corporate acquisitions in related fields
and technology. We continue our active pursuit of additional debt
and equity financing through discussions with investment bankers
and private investors.
Our goal on the AERG Strategic Plan is to increase the energy, peak
power and frequency agility of USP optical sources while decreasing
the size, weight, and cost of these systems. We are in the process
of developing this breadth of very high peak power USP lasers and
additional optical sources that have a very broad range of
applicability for threat disruption for the Department of Defense,
commercial, and medical applications. Although the historical
market for AERG’s LGE and USP technology is the U.S. Government,
the USP technologies are expected to provide numerous platforms for
commercial additive and subtractive manufacturing and medical
device and imaging markets, creating a substantially larger market
for our products to address.
The
ongoing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic does present
unique risks and uncertainties that may alter or otherwise affect
our path forward. Our management continues to monitor the possible
effects of the COVID-19 on the execution of our plan of operations,
our prospective contracts, and the availability of financing to
fund our strategic and operational plans going forward. Despite
these challenges, we have continued to execute our business
development plans and to deliver on our government contracts as per
the timeline commitments. During the quarter, we submitted multiple
proposals and have been engaged in meetings on a daily and weekly
basis with various agencies and departments both remotely and in
person in Washington, DC and at various other government
facilities. Dr. Quarles, our CEO, has traveled to DC on multiple
occasions during the quarter, and remains very committed to
pursuing this business even in these challenging times. The
interest in our technology and applications remains high, and we
continue to submit proposals for all appropriate
opportunities.
Through our analysis of the market, and in discussions with
potential customers, we would also conclude that customers are
becoming more receptive and interested in directed energy
technologies. According to the Department of Defense fiscal 2019
budget, its directed energy spending grew from approximately $500
million in 2017 to over $1 billion in 2019, an increase of 100%.
The 2020 budget reflected directed energy spending of $1.2 billion,
an additional increase of 20% over 2019, and from 2017 through
2020, the directed energy budget grew from approximately $500
million to approximately $1.2 billion, averaging approximately 40%
per year. As a result, we continue to be even more optimistic about
our future and the growing opportunities in directed energy
applications. As the US Congress finalizes their Appropriations
process for the 2021 budget, the AERG team anticipates a
continuation of strong funding for the Directed Energy community.
With our existing patent portfolio, and through further
advancements of our technologies, we believe we have the
substantial building blocks needed to become a significant and
successful developer in our marketplace.
Market
for Our Technology
Directed
Energy Weapons
Directed
energy weapon system means military action involving the use of
directed energy to incapacitate, damage, or destroy enemy
equipment, facilities, and assets. Previous to LGE, the only two
viable directed energy weapon systems were High Energy Laser (HEL),
which uses heat to burn targets and High Power Radio Frequency
(HP-RF), weapons that use electromagnetic energy at specific
frequencies to disable electronic systems.
HEL
and HP-RF directed energy technologies have been under development
for decades with numerous DoD and other government contractors
participating. The unique attributes of directed energy weapon
systems —the ability to create precise effects against multiple
targets near-instantaneously and at a very low cost per shot—have
great potential to help the DoD in addressing future warfare
requirements. The DoD invests research and development dollars into
directed energy solutions to fill gaps identified by warfighters.
For example, in future conflicts with capable enemies possessing
large inventories of guided missiles, it may be operationally risky
and cost-prohibitive for the U.S. military to continue to rely
exclusively on a limited number of kinetic missile interceptors.
Such a “missile competition” could allow an adversary to impose
costs on U.S. forces by compelling them to intercept each incoming
missile with far more expensive kinetic munitions. The DoD has made
significant leaps in both performance and maturity as a result of
many years of research.
Laser
Guided Energy
AERG’s
patented LGE weapon technology works via wireless electrical energy
transmission through the atmosphere, to disable vehicles and other
threats to our security. AERG has developed the underlying
technologies that allow a user to precisely control where the
directed energy goes in direction, range, and magnitude. AERG’s LGE
technologies are combined to create “laser filaments” as the laser
passes through the atmosphere. The filaments in turn create Laser
Induced Plasma Channels (“LIPC”) which enable the transmission of
electrical energy.
Our
development of LGE has led to a third directed energy technology
creating a generational opportunity for a completely new weapon
system development. The Company uniquely owns the critical
intellectual property for LGE. The unique properties and
demonstrated target effects of LGE allow for mission areas and
applications that are not accessible to either HEL or RF directed
energy. Therefore, LGE fills numerous requirements in the urban and
asymmetric warfare environment. There is a very broad range of
targets and effects that LGE addresses that are uniquely different
from HEL and RF directed energy and therefore we do not compete
directly within those application spaces.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2020 and
2019:
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
General and
administrative |
|
$ |
(1,128,324 |
) |
|
$ |
(610,446 |
) |
Selling and marketing |
|
|
(71,840 |
) |
|
|
(53,999 |
) |
Research and development |
|
|
(65,317 |
) |
|
|
(95,890 |
) |
Interest
(expense) |
|
|
(109,229 |
) |
|
|
(26,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
|
$ |
(1,374,710 |
) |
|
$ |
(786,820 |
) |
General and Administrative
General
and administrative expenses increased approximately $518,000 to
$1,128,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to
$610,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 primarily due to
the increase of $475,000 of professional expenses, an increase in
building costs of $28,000 and an increase in salaries and employee
benefits of $15,000.
Selling and Marketing
Selling
and marketing expenses increased approximately $18,000 to $72,000
for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $54,000 for
the three months ended June 30, 2019 primarily due to the
continuation of business development activities through our Master
Services Agreement with Westpark Advisors as well as the addition
of other consultants in this field.
Research and Development
Research
and development expenses decreased approximately $31,000 to $65,000
for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $96,000 for
the three months ended June 30, 2019 primarily due to the
allocation of part of management’s pay from research and
development to consulting expense.
Interest Expense
Interest
expense increased approximately $83,000 to $109,000 for the three
months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $26,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2019 primarily due to increased levels of debt as
well as the $50,000 penalty interest on the note payable for the
AOS acquisition.
Net Loss
Our
operations for the three months ended June 30, 2020 resulted in a
net loss of approximately $1,375,000, an increase of approximately
$588,000 compared to the approximately $787,000 net loss for the
three months ended June 30, 2019 primarily due to an increase in
professional fees, an increase in building costs, an increase in
salaries and employee benefits, an increase in selling and
marketing and an increase in interest expense offset by a decrease
in research and development costs.
Comparison
of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and
2019:
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
General and administrative |
|
$ |
(2,218,744 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,067,165 |
) |
Selling and marketing |
|
|
(153,526 |
) |
|
|
(106,333 |
) |
Research and development |
|
|
(122,796 |
) |
|
|
(168,550 |
) |
Other
income |
|
|
15,833 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Interest
(expense) |
|
|
(170,568 |
) |
|
|
(30,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
|
$ |
(2,639,801 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,372,973 |
) |
Revenue
Revenue
increased $10,000 to $10,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2020
compared to $-0- for the six months ended June 30, 2019 based on a
contract we acquired in the purchase of Applied Optical
Sciences.
General and Administrative
General
and administrative expenses increased approximately $1,152,000 to
$2,219,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to
$1,067,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 primarily due to
the increase of $979,000 of professional expenses, an increase in
salaries and employee benefits of $94,000, an increase in building
costs of $42,000, an increase in travel expense of $18,000 and an
increase in supplies and insurance expense of $14,000.
Selling and Marketing
Selling
and marketing expenses increased approximately $47,000 to $154,000
for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $106,000 for the
six months ended June 30, 2019 primarily due to the continuation of
business development activities through our Master Services
Agreement with Westpark Advisors as well as the addition of other
consultants in this field.
Research and Development
Research
and development expenses decreased approximately $46,000 to
$123,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to
$169,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 primarily due to
the allocation of part of management’s pay from research and
development to consulting expense.
Other Income
Other
income increased approximately $16,000 to $16,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $-0- for the six months
ended June 30, 2019 to reflect the income from time and effort
expenses on the subcontract to the Missile Defense Agency (thru
AlionSciences) as a subject matter expert on a series of program
reviews.
Interest Expense
Interest
expense increased approximately $140,000 to $171,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $31,000 for the six months
ended June 30, 2019 primarily due to increased levels of debt as
well as the $50,000 penalty interest on the note payable for the
AOS acquisition.
Net Loss
Our
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2020 resulted in a net
loss of approximately $2,640,000, an increase of approximately
$1,267,000 compared to the approximately $1,373,000 net loss for
the six months ended June 30, 2019 primarily due to an increase in
professional fees, an increase in salaries and employee benefits,
an increase in selling and marketing, an increase in supplies and
insurance expense and an increase in interest expense offset by a
decrease in research and development costs and an increase in other
income.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2020, we had approximately $447,000 of cash and cash
equivalents, an increase of approximately $359,000 from December
31, 2019. During the first six months of 2020, the net cash outflow
from operating activities was approximately $1,260,000. This amount
was comprised primarily of our net loss of $2,640,000, an increase
in prepaid expenses and deposits of $106,000, a decrease in
accounts payable of $57,000, partially offset by noncash stock
based compensation of $791,000, amortization of future compensation
payable of $417,000, an increase in accrued interest of $121,000,
amortization of prepaid expenses of $98,000, an increase in
customer deposits of $66,000, an increase in accrued expenses and
compensation of $32,000, a decrease in accounts receivable of
$10,000 and depreciation and amortization of $9,000. Financing
activities reflected $1,644,000 in proceeds from issuance of common
stock, $133,000 in proceeds from notes payable and proceeds from
the exercise of warrants and options of $75,000, partially offset
by the repayment on notes payable of $233,000 resulting in net cash
inflow of approximately $359,000.
Following the end of the quarter, in July and August, 2020, we
received $4,049,000 in bridge funding pursuant to 10% Convertible
Promissory Notes. These notes are convertible into shares of our
common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per share, as
negotiated with the holders based on the prevailing market price of
the common stock leading up to the issuance of the notes. At any
time after October 15, 2020 until July 15, 2021, the date of
maturity, (i) each investor may elect to convert these notes into
shares of our common stock, at a conversion price of $0.30 per
share and (ii) the company may elect to prepay, either in cash or
in shares of common stock at a price of $0.30 per share, at the
option of the holder, the amount of principal and interest then
outstanding under each note. In the event we elect to prepay the
notes, we will notify the holders, each of whom will then have five
business days to notify the company if they prefer to receive such
prepayment in cash or stock. These notes are payable in full at
maturity. In lieu of repayment of the principal and interest on the
notes at maturity, the Company may elect to convert the amounts due
into shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.15 per share.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going
concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. For
the six-months ended June 30, 2020, the company incurred a net loss
of approximately $2,640,000, had negative cash flows from
operations of $1,260,000 and may incur additional future losses due
to the reduction in Government contract activity. These matters
raise substantial doubt as to the company’s ability to continue as
a going concern.
The
company’s existence is dependent upon management’s ability to
develop profitable operations. Management is devoting substantially
all of its efforts to developing its business and raising capital
and there can be no assurance that the company’s efforts will be
successful. No assurance can be given that management’s actions
will result in profitable operations or the resolution of its
liquidity problems. The accompanying consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result should
the company be unable to continue as a going concern.
In
order to improve the company’s liquidity, the company’s management
is actively pursuing additional debt and equity financing through
discussions with investment bankers and private investors. There
can be no assurance that the company will be successful in its
effort to secure additional debt and equity financing.
The
financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability of assets and the amount or classification of
liabilities that might be necessary should the company be unable to
continue as a going concern.
In
their report accompanying our financial statements, our independent
auditors stated that our financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2019 were prepared assuming that we would continue as
a going concern, and that they have substantial doubt as to our
ability to continue as a going concern. Our auditors’ have noted
that our recurring losses from operations and need to raise
additional capital to sustain operations raise substantial doubt
about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Backlog
of Orders
At
May 12, 2020, we had a backlog (workload remaining on signed
contracts) of approximately $166,000, to be completed within the
next twelve months.
ITEM
4. |
Controls
and Procedures |
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June
30, 2020. Based on that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer
has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of
June 30, 2020 are not effective to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There
was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting
that occurred during the period covered by this report, which has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. |
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS |
As
previously reported, on July 3, 2018, we commenced a lawsuit in the
Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against the company’s
former director and principal executive officer George Farley and
AnneMarieCo LLC (“AMC”).
The
lawsuit alleges to the following six causes of action:
|
1. |
Breach
of Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty against George Farley |
|
2. |
Breach
of Fiduciary Duty of Care against George Farley |
|
3. |
Aiding
and Abetting Breach of Fiduciary Duty against AMC |
|
4. |
Conversion
against George Farley |
|
5. |
Fraudulent
Transfer against George Farley and AMC |
|
6. |
Injunctive
Relief against George Farley and AMC |
This
report provides an update on the progress of the
litigation.
In
connection with the lawsuit, the company requested a temporary
restraining order prohibiting Mr. Farley and AMC from selling their
25 million shares of the company’s common stock which the company
alleges were improperly issued. On July 20, 2018, the Delaware
Court of Chancery, Vice Chancellor Tamika Montgomery-Reeves
presiding, entered a “status quo” order upon the stipulation of the
parties, whereby Mr. Farley and AMC agreed not to transfer,
alienate or sell any of their shares pending a ruling on the
company’s motion for a preliminary injunction.
On
July 26, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered a scheduling
order setting dates and deadlines for, among other matters, a
hearing and briefing schedule on the amount of the bond the company
would be required to post to maintain the “status quo” order
through the preliminary injunction hearing, a hearing and briefing
schedule on the motion for a preliminary injunction, and a
discovery schedule.
Also,
in connection with the lawsuit, on August 8, 2018, the company
filed a motion to disqualify Mr. Farley’s attorney, Ryan Whalen,
who had previously represented the company.
On
August 14, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order
requiring the company to post a bond in the total amount of
$200,446.52. On August 21, 2018, the company posted the bond via
Atlantic Specialty Insurance company acting as surety. Pursuant to
the contract between the company and Atlantic Specialty Insurance
company, the company deposited $200,446.52 in cash as collateral
for the surety agreement.
On
August 23, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery court extended the
hearing date on the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction
to October 23, 2018, and simultaneously ordered an increase in the
bond amount of $55,446.52. On August 30, 2018, the company posted
the increased bond amount, again with Atlantic Specialty Insurance
Company acting as surety, and deposited the additional $55,446.52
in cash with the surety.
On
September 7, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered an order
setting a briefing schedule on the company’s motion to disqualify
Mr. Whalen.
On
September 10, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered an order
governing the production and exchange of confidential documents and
information among the parties in discovery.
In
another Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 13, 2018, the
company updated the status of the litigation to include events that
occurred up to that date. This report further updates the progress
of the litigation.
On
October 16, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered a
scheduling order continuing the hearing date on the company’s
motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants George
Farley and AMC to December 14, 2018.
The
October 16, 2018 order also required the company to increase its
bond amount by an additional $185,301.86 ($80,301.86 for AMC and
$105,000.00 for Mr. Farley) to account for the continued hearing
date. On October 24, 2018, the company posted the additional bond
amount of $185,301.86.
On
October 16, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order
denying the company’s motion to disqualify Mr. Whalen.
On
January 23, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a
Memorandum Opinion, granting a preliminary injunction prohibiting
Mr. Farley and AMC from selling their 25 million shares of the
company’s common stock, which the company alleges were improperly
issued. On January 24, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued
a revised Memorandum Opinion correcting calculations regarding the
increased bond amount.
In
granting the preliminary injunction, the Court found that the
company met “its considerable burden” of demonstrating it was
likely to win its lawsuit against Mr. Farley and AMC. Specifically,
the Court found it was “reasonably probable” Mr. Farley had
unlawfully issued the 25 million shares without proper
authorization, Mr. Farley had breached his duty of loyalty to the
company, Mr. Farley was unlikely to prove the stock issuance was
procedurally or substantively “fair” to the company, and Mr. Farley
had fraudulently transferred 20 million of the shares to AMC.
Finally, the Court ruled because Farley and AMC’s 25 million shares
represented approximately one eighth of the company’s outstanding
ownership, the injunction was necessary to protect the company’s
capital structure, ability to attract new investors, ability to
raise new capital and continue deployment of its plans now underway
to revitalize its business.
In
its Memorandum Opinion, the Court also required that the company
post additional bond money, bringing the total cash collateral for
the surety agreement to $582,377.26. The company posted the
additional bond amount, and deposited the additional cash amount
with the surety, on January 29, 2019.
On
March 4, 2019, the company filed an amended complaint adding claims
against Mr. Farley concerning loans Mr. Farley caused the company
take from PowerUp Lending Group Ltd. and Auctus Fund LLC from
September 2017 through March 2018. Mr. Farley responded to the
amended complaint by filing a motion to dismiss the lawsuit based
on Delaware Court of Chancery Rules 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(7). On
September 28, 2019, the Delaware Chancery Court denied this
motion.
On
July 7, 2019, the company filed a motion to reduce or eliminate the
cash bond requirement. As previously reported, the cash bond was
required by the Delaware Chancery Court. On September 30, 2019, the
Delaware Chancery Court denied the motion.
On
July 19, 2019, Mr. Farley and AMC filed answers and amended counter
claims in response to the Company’s amended complaint. The amended
counter claims add claims under Delaware General Corporate Law
section 205, seeking to validate the stock issuances at issue in
the litigation.
On
July 29, 2019, the Delaware Chancery Court entered a scheduling
order which, among other deadlines, rescheduled the trial date to
begin on January 21, 2020. However, the judge presiding in the
case, Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves, was subsequently appointed
and confirmed to the Delaware Supreme Court.
The
case was reassigned to Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster. On January
14, 2020, Vice Chancellor Laster held a scheduling conference. On
January 29, 2020, the Delaware Chancery Court entered a scheduling
order setting the trial date for July 20, 2020. On June 2, 2020,
the Delaware Chancery Court issued a scheduling order setting dates
for pre-trial motion practice, hearings and conferences leading up
to a trial date of September 21-24, 2020.
On
September 26, 2019, the company filed a motion for partial summary
judgment concerning the issuance of company stock to Mr. Farley
without having been authorized by a quorum of the board of
directors. The previous hearing date of November 20, 2019, was
postponed while the case awaited a new judge assignment. The motion
was heard on July 23, 2020, by Vice Chancellor Laster.
On
August 3, 2020, in our ongoing litigation against George Farley,
the company’s former CEO, and AnneMarieCo., LLC, the Chancery Court
of the State of Delaware issued an Opinion granting in part and
denying in part the company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
The Court granted the company’s motion in the following respect:
“Farley could not validly take action as the sole remaining
director between February 10, 2016, and March 9, 2018. The stock
that he issued to himself is invalid, as is the compensation that
he attempted to grant to himself. The shares that he gifted to
AnneMarieCo remain invalid, notwithstanding their transfer to
AnneMarieCo.” The court denied the motion in all other respects,
rejecting the company’s argument that Section 205 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law is unavailable for the defendants to
petition the court cure the invalidity of the stock and
compensation, leaving open the possibility for the court to
reinstate the shares and/or compensation in whole or in part under
Section 205. The trial is now scheduled for September 21-23,
2020.
In a
related matter, on February 8, 2019, the company filed a complaint
against Stein Riso Mantel McDonough, LLP (“Stein Riso”), its former
counsel, in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York alleging the following:
|
1. |
breach
of fiduciary duty; |
|
2. |
legal
malpractice; |
|
3. |
aiding
and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty; |
|
4. |
voidance
of fees under New York Rules of Professional Conduct
1.8; |
|
5. |
violation
of New York Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5; |
|
6. |
securities
fraud; |
|
7. |
breach
of contract; and |
|
8. |
unjust
enrichment. |
The
complaint against Stein Riso followed the issuance, on January 23,
2019, of a Memorandum Opinion granting the company’s motion for a
preliminary injunction by the Delaware Court of Chancery in the
case against George Farley and AMC. Stein Riso has responded to the
complaint by filing a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The company amended its
complaint in response. On July 31, 2019, Stein Riso responded to
the company’s amended complaint by filing another motion to dismiss
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The company
filed an opposition to this motion on August 14, 2019. Stein Riso
filed a reply brief on September 13, 2019.
On
May 31, 2020, the United States District Court issued an opinion
and order denying in part and granting in part the motion of Stein
Riso to dismiss the company’s complaint. The court rejected Stein
Riso’s arguments that the allegations in the company’s complaint
did not adequately allege Stein Riso committed malpractice and
aided and abetted breaches of fiduciary duties by George Farley,
the company’s former CEO and the defendant in a related action in
the Delaware Chancery Court. The court dismissed a separate cause
of action which the company had pled for “rescission and
restitution” for Stein Riso’s alleged violations of the New York
Rules of Professional Conduct, finding it was “duplicative” of our
professional malpractice cause of action. The court also dismissed
the company’s cause of action against Stein Riso for securities
fraud.
On June 25, 2020, the United States District Court issued a civil
case management plan and scheduling order. On July 24, 2020, the
company filed a motion to amend its complaint to add two individual
attorneys at Stein Riso as defendants. The United States District
Court has ordered the parties to appear at a mediation on August
13, 2020.
On
July 3, 2019, Gusrae, Kaplan & Nusbaum and its partner, Ryan
Whalen, counsel for defendants, George Farley and AnneMarie Co.
LLC, in the litigation brought by the company and pending in
Delaware, filed a claim in the District Court for the Southern
District of New York against the company its directors, officers,
attorneys and a consultant. The action alleges libel, securities
fraud and related claims. The company believes that this suit lacks
merit and intends to dispute these allegations. The company filed a
motion to dismiss the complaint on October 24, 2019. On December
13, 2019, Gusrae Kaplan and Mr. Whalen filed an opposition to the
Company’s motion. On January 10, 2020, the company filed a reply
brief. The United States District Court has not yet ruled on the
motion.
As
with any litigation, the company cannot predict the outcome with
certainty, but the company expects to provide further updates on
the status of the litigation as circumstances warrant.
We
may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings arising
from the normal course of business.
ITEM
2. |
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
On April 8, 2020, we received $60,000 from an individual based on a
subscription agreement with the company for which we issued 200,000
shares of its common stock.
On April 23, 2020, we received $72,000 from an individual based on
a subscription agreement with the company for which we issued
240,000 shares of its common stock.
On April 29, 2020, we received $400,000 from an individual based on
a subscription agreement with the company for which we issued
1,333,333 shares of its common stock.
In
June 2020, we issued 18,750 shares of common stock based on a
restricted stock agreement with a contractor.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
By |
/s/
Gregory J Quarles |
|
|
Gregory
J Quarles |
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
(and
Principal Financial Officer) |
|
Date:
August 12, 2020
30