As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 22, 2021 Registration No. 333-252828                  

 

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

PRE-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

         
British Columbia, Canada   5900   98-1463868
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
  (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

 

450 Lexington Avenue, #3308
New York, New York 10163
United States
(646) 600-9181

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

James A. Doherty, Esq.
450 Lexington Avenue, #3308
New York, New York 10163
United States
(646) 600-9181

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

Copies to:

James A. Doherty
Acreage Holdings, Inc.
450 Lexington Avenue, #3308
New York, New York 10163

United States

(646) 600-9181

Robert Fonn

DLA Piper (Canada) LLP

Suite 6000, 1 First Canadian Place

PO Box 367, 100 King St W

Toronto, Ontario M5X 1E2 Canada

(416) 369 5280

Jessica S Lochmann

Foley & Lardner LLP

777 East Wisconsin Avenue

Milwaukee, WI 53202

United States

(414) 297-5817

     

 

From time to time after the effective date of this registration statement

(Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to public)

 

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box. x

 

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer x Smaller reporting company x
  Emerging growth company x

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of Securities Act. ¨

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

Title of each class of
securities to be registered
  Amount to be
registered
    Proposed
Maximum
Aggregate
Offering Price
per unit
    Proposed
Maximum
Aggregate
Offering Price
   

Amount of
registration
fee(3)(4)

 
Class E Subordinate Voting Shares Underlying Warrants (exercisable at $4.00)     4,259,633                   $ 23,087,211 (1)        
Class D Subordinate Voting Shares Underlying Warrants (exercisable at $4.00)     1,825,556             $ 4,719,063 (2)        
Class E Subordinate Voting Shares     17,980             $

97,452

(1)        
Class D Subordinate Voting Shares     7,705             $ 19,918 (2)        
Class E Subordinate Voting Shares Underlying Warrants (exercisable at $3.15)     1,556,929             $ 8,438,556 (1)        
Class D Subordinate Voting Shares Underlying Warrants (exercisable at $3.01)     697,666             $ 1,803,467 (2)        
Total                   $

38,165,667

    $ 4,164 (5)

 

(1) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(c) under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) based on the average of the high and low prices of our Class E subordinate voting shares reported on the OTCQX on April 20, 2021.

 

(2) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act based on the average of the high and low prices of our Class D subordinate voting shares reported on the OTCQX on April 20, 2021.

 

(3) Pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act, the registration fee has been calculated on the basis of the maximum aggregate offering price and the number of securities being registered has been omitted.

 

(4) The registration fee has been calculated in accordance with Rule 457 under the Securities Act based on the current statutory fee of $109.10 per million.

 

Pursuant to Rule 457(p) under the Securities Act, a registration fee of $96,960 was paid with respect to securities available for issuance under a Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-232313) filed on June 24, 2019, as amended on August 9, 2019, and declared effective on August 12, 2019 (the “Prior F-10”). In connection with a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-239332) filed on June 22, 2020, as amended on August 21, 2020, and declared effective on September 3, 2020 (the “Prior S-3”), and pursuant to Rule 457(p), $89,046 was available to offset the filing fees associated with the Prior S-3, which represented the registration fees associated with $734,705,886 of unsold securities under the Prior F-10. The $52,955 registration fee associated with the Prior S-3 was entirely offset against the prepaid registration fees made in connection with the securities available for issuance under the Prior F-10, with $36,091 remaining to be applied to future filings. Pursuant to Rule 415(a)(6), the offering of the unsold securities registered under the Prior F-10 was deemed terminated as of the date of effectiveness of the Prior S-3.

 

Pursuant to Rule 457(p), $88,737 is presently available for offset, which represents (i) the $36,091 prepaid registration fees remaining from the Prior F-10 after entirely offsetting the registration fees in connection with the Prior S-3 and (ii) the registration fees associated with $52,646 of unsold securities under the Prior S-3. Of this amount, $35,725 was used with respect to the filing of a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-249583) filed on October 20, 2020 but never declared effective (the “Non-Effective S-3”). The Non-Effective S-3 has been withdrawn by a filing of withdrawal request on January 26, 2021. Any fees associated with the Non-Effective S-3 now remain available for use. Accordingly, the $4,164 registration fee associated with this registration statement is hereby entirely offset against the prepaid registration fees made in connection with the securities available for issuance under the Prior F-10 and Prior S-3 with $84,573 remaining to be applied to future filings. Pursuant to Rule 415(a)(6), the offering of the unsold securities registered under the Prior S-3 will be deemed terminated as of the date of effectiveness of this registration statement.

 

(5) Previously paid.

 

The Registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act, or until this registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

 

 

 

The information in this Prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the Securities and Exchange Commission declares our registration statement effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

 

Subject to Completion April 22, 2021

 

PROSPECTUS

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.

 

4,259,633 Class E Subordinate Voting Shares Underlying Warrants (exercisable at $4.00) Previously Issued

1,825,556 Class D Subordinate Voting Shares Underlying Warrants (exercisable at $4.00) Previously Issued

17,980 Class E Subordinate Voting Shares

7,705 Class D Subordinate Voting Shares

1,556,929 Class E Subordinate Voting Shares Underlying Warrants (exercisable at $3.15) Previously Issued

697,666 Class D Subordinate Voting Shares Underlying Warrants (exercisable at $3.01) Previously Issued

 

This Prospectus relates to the resale of Class E subordinate voting shares, no par value (the “Fixed Shares”) and Class D subordinate voting shares, no par value (the “Floating Shares”) as set out herein, including by the security holders named herein (the “February Warrant Selling Security Holders”) of 4,259,633 Fixed Shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants previously issued by us in February 2020, with an exercise price of $4.00 per Fixed Share, subject to adjustment, and which expire five years after their issuance (the “February Fixed Warrants”) and to 1,825,556 Class D Floating Shares, issuable upon the exercise of warrants previously issued by us in February 2020, with an exercise price of $4.00 per Floating Share, subject to adjustment, and which expire five years after their issuance (the “February Floating Warrants” and together with the February Fixed Warrants, the “February Warrants”).

 

This Prospectus also relates to the resale by Pilgrim Foresight Fund, LLC (“Pilgrim” or the “Commitment Shares Selling Security Holder”) of 17,980 Fixed Shares and 7,705 Floating Shares issued during two transactions completed in 2020 and further described below.

 

In addition, this Prospectus relates to the resale by the security holders named herein (the “November Warrant Selling Security Holders” and together with the February Warrant Selling Security Holders and the Commitment Shares Selling Security Holder, the “Selling Security Holders”) of 1,556,929 Fixed Shares, issuable upon the exercise of warrants previously issued by us in November 2020, with an exercise price of $3.15 per Fixed Share, subject to adjustment, and which expire four years after their issuance (the “November Fixed Warrants”) and 697,666 Floating Shares, issuable upon the exercise of warrants previously issued by us in November 2020, with an exercise price of $3.01 per Floating Share, subject to adjustment, and which expire four years after their issuance (the “November Floating Warrants” and together with the November Fixed Warrants, the “November Warrants” and the November Warrants along with the February Warrants, the “Warrants”).

 

The Fixed Shares are currently listed on the Canadian Securities Exchange (the “CSE”) under the trading symbol “ACRG.A.U”, quoted on the OTCQX® Best Market by OTC Markets Group (“OTCQX”) under the trading symbol “ACRHF”, and traded on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (“FRA”) under the trading symbol “0VZ1”. The Floating Shares are currently listed on the CSE under the trading symbol “ACRG.B.U”, quoted on the OTCQX under the trading symbol “ACRDF”, and traded on the FRA under the trading symbol “0VZ2”. On April 20, 2021, the last reported sale price of the Fixed Shares on the OTCQX was $5.23 per Fixed Share and on the CSE was $5.24 per Fixed Share. On April 20, 2021, the last reported sale price of the Floating Shares on the OTCQX was $2.60 per Floating Share and on the CSE was $2.60 per Floating Share.

 

Investing in the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares involves risks. See “Risk Factors” on page 14.

 

These Fixed Shares and Floating Shares have not been approved or disapproved by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or any state securities commission nor has the SEC or any state securities commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this Prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

 
THE DATE OF THIS PROSPECTUS IS           , 2021.

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS ii
   
IMPLICATIONS OF BEING AN EMERGING GROWTH COMPANY iii
   
SUMMARY 1
   
THE OFFERING 10
   
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA 12
   
RISK FACTORS 14
   
USE OF PROCEEDS 40
   
MARKET FOR OUR SHARES 41
   
SELLING SECURITY HOLDERS 42
   
DILUTION 47
   
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 49
   
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. 51
   
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES 60
   
BUSINESS 68
   
PROPERTIES 125
   
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 127
   
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 131
   
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT 136
   
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 138
   
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 140
   
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION 141
   
DESCRIPTION OF FIXED SHARES 143
   
DESCRIPTION OF FLOATING SHARES 144
   
CERTAIN CANADIAN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS 145
   
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS 149
   
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 154
   
LEGAL MATTERS 154
   
EXPERTS 154
   
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION 154
   
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS F-1

 

i

 

 

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

 

This Prospectus relates to the resale by the February Warrant Selling Security Holders named herein of 4,259,633 Fixed Shares, issuable upon the exercise of the February Fixed Warrants and 1,825,556 Floating Shares, issuable upon the exercise of the February Floating Warrants.

 

This Prospectus also relates to the resale by the Commitment Shares Selling Security Holders named herein of 17,980 Fixed Shares and 7,705 Floating Shares issued during two transactions completed in 2020 and further described below.

 

In addition, this Prospectus relates to the resale by the November Warrant Selling Security Holders named herein of 1,556,929 Fixed Shares, issuable upon the exercise of the November Fixed Warrants and to 697,666 Floating Shares, issuable upon the exercise of the November Floating Warrants.

 

Under this Registration Statement on Form S-1, the Selling Security Holders may sell from time to time in one or more offerings the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares described in this Prospectus. Any statement contained in the prospectus concerning the provisions of any document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement or otherwise filed with the SEC is not necessarily complete, and in each instance, reference is made to the copy of the document filed. You should review the complete document to evaluate these statements.

 

You should carefully read this Prospectus and any free writing prospectus that we have authorized before making an investment decision. You should rely only on the information contained in this Prospectus any free writing prospectus that we have authorized. We have not authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with additional, different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it.

 

This Prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should not assume that the information in this Prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front of each such document. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since those dates.

 

The information contained in this Prospectus, the documents and any free writing prospectus that we have authorized are accurate only as of their respective dates, regardless of the time of delivery of this Prospectus or of any sale of our Fixed Shares or Floating Shares. In this Prospectus, unless the context otherwise indicates, the terms “Acreage,” the “Company,” “Registrant,” “we,” “our” and “us” or similar terms refer to Acreage Holdings, Inc., including our subsidiaries. Any references in this Prospectus to our financial statements include, unless the context indicates otherwise, the related notes.

 

References in this Prospectus to “$” are to United States dollars. Canadian dollars are indicated by the symbol “C$”.

 

Owning Fixed Shares or Floating Shares may subject you to tax consequences in Canada, the United States or in other applicable jurisdictions. You should read the tax discussion in this Prospectus with respect to the offering of Fixed Shares and Floating Shares and consult your own tax advisor with respect to your own particular circumstances.

 

You should rely only on the information contained in this Prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this Prospectus. The distribution or possession of this Prospectus in or from certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law. This Prospectus is not an offer to sell these Fixed Shares or Floating Shares and is not soliciting an offer to buy these Fixed Shares or Floating Shares in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted or where the person making the offer or sale is not qualified to do so or to any person to whom it is not permitted to make such offer or sale. The information contained in this Prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this Prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this Prospectus or of any sale of the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

 

ii

 

 

IMPLICATIONS OF BEING AN EMERGING GROWTH COMPANY

 

As a company with less than $1.07 billion in revenue during our most recently completed fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act. As an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of specified reduced disclosure and other exemptions from requirements that are otherwise applicable to public companies that are not emerging growth companies. These provisions include:

 

Reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements;

 

Exemptions from non-binding shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements; and

 

Exemption from the auditor attestation requirement in the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting.

 

We may take advantage of these exemptions for up to five years, ending on December 31, 2024, or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We would cease to be an emerging growth company if we have more than $1.07 billion in annual revenues as of the end of a fiscal year, if we are deemed to be a large-accelerated filer under the rules of the SEC or if we issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt over a three-year period.

 

iii

 

 

SUMMARY

 

The Company

 

Acreage Holdings, Inc. (“Acreage”, “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company”) is a vertically integrated, multi-state operator in the U.S. cannabis industry. Our operations include (i) cultivating cannabis plants, (ii) manufacturing branded consumer products, (iii) distributing cannabis flower and manufactured products, and (iv) retailing high-quality, effective and dosable cannabis products to consumers. We appeal to medical and adult recreational use (“adult-use”) customers through brand strategies intended to build trust and loyalty.

 

We are a British Columbia company that began trading on the Canadian Securities Exchange on November 15, 2018 following the completion of the reverse takeover transaction (the “RTO”) between us and High Street Capital Partners, LLC (“High Street”), which is an indirect subsidiary of ours, on November 14, 2018. We were originally incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) on July 12, 1989 as Applied Inventions Management Inc. On August 29, 2014, we changed our name to Applied Inventions Management Corp. We redomiciled from Ontario into British Columbia and changed our name to Acreage Holdings, Inc. on November 9, 2018.

 

Kevin Murphy, our Chairman, began investing in the cannabis space in 2011 with minority investments in dispensaries located in medical-use states on the east coast of the United States. High Street was founded by Mr. Murphy in April 2014 to invest in the burgeoning U.S. regulated cannabis market and, until April 2018, was an investment holding company and engaged in the business of investing in cannabis companies. As part of the formation of High Street in 2014, Mr. Murphy contributed his cannabis related investment portfolio valued at approximately $14 million to High Street in exchange for 20,000,000 Class B membership units of High Street.

 

We and High Street have invested in geographically diverse licensed entities that operate in both the adult-use and medical-use authorized U.S. states. The companies and other entities in which we and High Street have a direct or indirect ownership interest (collectively, the “Subsidiaries”) focus on all aspects of the state regulated cannabis industry. As a result of its experience investing in the industry, and, in many cases, active involvement with the Subsidiaries, High Street’s management gained significant experience in cultivation, processing and dispensing of cannabis and cannabis infused products.

 

From inception until April 2018, when High Street began the process of converting its minority investments in many of the Subsidiaries into controlling interests, the principal business activity of High Street was to provide debt and equity capital to existing cannabis license holders, cannabis license applicants and related management companies which are party to financing and consulting services agreements with High Street-owned entities in certain U.S. states where medical-use and/or adult-use of cannabis is legal. Such investments included straight debt securities (secured or unsecured), convertible debt instruments and/or common or preferred equity securities issued by the Subsidiaries. As an investor in these Subsidiaries, High Street was generally entitled to hold board seats and played an advisory role in the management and operations of such Subsidiaries, which afforded High Street the opportunity to build its institutional knowledge in the cannabis space. Additionally, being an investor in the Subsidiaries provided High Street with the ability to develop a vertically-integrated U.S. cannabis market participant with one of the largest footprints in the industry at the time.

 

High Street is a Delaware limited liability company, or LLC, rather than a corporation. Unlike a corporation, generally all profits and losses of the business carried on by an LLC “pass through” to each member of the LLC. LLC members report their respective shares of such profits and losses on their U.S. federal tax returns. Membership equity interests in High Street are represented by units.

 

1

 

 

Since 2018, we have been, and continue to be, committed to providing access to cannabis’ beneficial properties by creating high quality products and consumer experiences.

 

Strategy and the Acreage Operations Footprint

 

As of the date of this Prospectus, Acreage owns and operates cannabis businesses or has management or consulting services or other agreements to assist in operations in place with licensed operators in 13 states. Through its subsidiaries, Acreage is engaged in, or has management or consulting services agreements in place with license holders to assist in the manufacture, possession, sale or distribution of cannabis in the adult-use or medical cannabis marketplace in California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon and Pennsylvania.

 

During 2020 as part of an overall strategic plan to focus on key, profitable operations we decided to continue to develop operations in the following nine core states of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Illinois and Ohio. We expect this shift in focus to lead to margin improvements and accelerate our pathway to achieve positive returns.

 

Acreage is dedicated to unlocking the transformational power of cannabis to heal and change the world in order to achieve its full potential in helping all people live better lives. Our mission is to champion and provide access to cannabis’ beneficial properties by creating the highest quality medical and adult-use products and consumer experiences. Our operational strategy to deliver on our vision and mission revolves around four primary areas of focus: (1) cultivation; (2) retail; (3) processing/manufacturing and (4) wholesale. While we focus on these four areas, we have determined that we have just one reportable business segment: the production and sale of cannabis products.

 

Amended Arrangement with Canopy Growth Corporation

 

On June 24, 2020, we entered into a proposal agreement (the “Proposal Agreement”) with Canopy Growth Corporation (“Canopy Growth”) which set out, among other things, the terms and conditions upon which us and Canopy Growth were proposing to enter into an amending agreement (the “Amending Agreement”) which, among other things, provided for certain amendments to the arrangement agreement entered into with Canopy Growth dated April 18, 2019, as amended on May 15, 2019 (the “Original Arrangement Agreement” and, as further amended on September 23, 2020, the “Arrangement Agreement”) and the amendment and restatement of the plan of arrangement implemented by us on June 24, 2019 ((the “Amended Plan of Arrangement”) to implement the arrangement contemplated in the Arrangement Agreement (the “Amended Arrangement”) pursuant to the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (“BCBCA”). The effectiveness of the Amending Agreement and the implementation of the Amended Plan of Arrangement was subject to the conditions set out in the Proposal Agreement, which included, among others, approval by: (i) the Supreme Court of British Columbia (the “Court”) at a hearing upon the procedural and substantive fairness of the terms and conditions of the Amended Arrangement; and (ii) our shareholders, as required by applicable corporate and securities laws.

 

The Amended Arrangement was approved by our shareholders at our special meeting held on September 16, 2020 and a final order approving the Amended Arrangement was obtained from the Court on September 18, 2020.

 

2

 

 

Following the satisfaction of various conditions set forth in the Proposal Agreement, on September 23, 2020, we entered into the Arrangement Agreement with Canopy Growth and implemented the Amended Plan of Arrangement effective at 12:01 a.m. (Vancouver time) (the “Amendment Time”) on September 23, 2020 (the “Amendment Date”).

 

Pursuant to the Amended Plan of Arrangement, among other things, Canopy Growth made a cash payment of $37,500,024 (the “Aggregate Amendment Option Payment”), which was delivered to our shareholders and certain holders of securities convertible or exchangeable into our shares. Holders of our then outstanding Class A subordinate voting shares (the “SVS”), Class B proportionate voting shares (the “PVS”), Class C multiple voting shares (the “MVS”), and certain other parties, received approximately $0.30 per SVS, being their pro rata portion (on an as-converted to SVS basis) of the Aggregate Amendment Option Payment, based on the number of our outstanding shares and certain holders of securities convertible or exchangeable into our shares, as of the close of business on September 22, 2020, the record date for payment of the Aggregate Amendment Option Payment. The Aggregate Amendment Option Payment was distributed to such holders of record on or about September 25, 2020.

 

Upon implementation of the Amended Plan of Arrangement, our articles were amended to, among other things, create three new classes of shares in our authorized share structure, being Fixed Shares, Floating Shares and Class F multiple voting shares (the “Fixed Multiple Shares”), and, in connection with such amendment, we completed a capital reorganization (the “Capital Reorganization”) effective as of the Amendment Time whereby: (i) each then outstanding SVS was exchanged for 0.7 of a Fixed Share and 0.3 of a Floating Share; (ii) each then outstanding PVS was exchanged for 28 Fixed Shares and 12 Floating Shares; and (iii) each then outstanding MVS was exchanged for 0.7 of a Fixed Multiple Share and 0.3 of a Floating Share.

 

At the Amendment Time, on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Amended Plan of Arrangement, each option, restricted share unit, compensation option and warrant to acquire SVS that was outstanding immediately prior to the Amendment Time was exchanged for a replacement option, restricted stock unit, compensation option or warrant, as applicable, to acquire Fixed Shares (a “Fixed Share Replacement Security”) and a replacement option, restricted stock unit, compensation option or warrant, as applicable, to acquire Floating Shares (a “Floating Share Replacement Security”) in order to account for the Capital Reorganization.

 

As a condition to implementation of the Amended Arrangement, an affiliate of Canopy Growth advanced the first tranche of $50,000,000 of a loan of up to $100,000,000 (the “Hempco Loan”) to Universal Hemp, LLC, an affiliate of the Company that operates solely in the hemp industry in full compliance with all applicable laws (“Universal Hemp”) pursuant to a secured debenture (the “Debenture”) bearing interest at a rate of 6.1% per annum and maturing 10 years from the date thereof. All interest payments made pursuant to the Debenture are payable in cash by Universal Hemp. The Debenture is not convertible and is not guaranteed by Acreage.. A further $50,000,000 advance will be made available upon satisfaction of specified conditions precedent. In accordance with the terms of the Debenture, the funds cannot be used, directly or indirectly, in connection with or for any cannabis or cannabis-related operations in the United States, unless and until such operations comply with all applicable laws of the United States.

 

Pursuant to the Amended Plan of Arrangement, upon the occurrence, or waiver (at the discretion of Canopy Growth), of a change in federal laws in the United States to permit the general cultivation, distribution and possession of marijuana (as defined in the relevant legislation) or to remove the regulation of such activities from the federal laws of the United States (the “Triggering Event” and the date on which the Triggering Event occurs, the “Triggering Event Date”), Canopy Growth, will, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions set out in the Arrangement Agreement: (i) acquire all of the issued and outstanding Fixed Shares (following the mandatory conversion of the Fixed Multiple Shares into Fixed Shares) on the basis of 0.3048 (the “Fixed Exchange Ratio”) of a common share of Canopy Growth (each, a “Canopy Growth Share”) for each Fixed Share held at the time of the acquisition of the Fixed Shares (the “Acquisition Time”), subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Amended Plan of Arrangement (the “Canopy Call Option”); and (ii) have the right (but not the obligation) (the “Floating Call Option”), exercisable for a period of 30 days following the Triggering Event Date to acquire all of the issued and outstanding Floating Shares. Upon exercise of the Floating Call Option, Canopy Growth may acquire the Floating Shares for cash or for Canopy Shares or a combination thereof, in Canopy Growth’s sole discretion. If paid in cash, the price per Floating Share shall be equal to the volume-weighted average trading price of the Floating Shares on the CSE (or other recognized stock exchange on which the Floating Shares are primarily traded as determined by volume) for the 30 trading day period prior to the exercise (or deemed exercise) of the Canopy Call Option, subject to a minimum amount of $6.41 (the “Floating Cash Consideration”). If paid in Canopy Shares, each Floating Share will be exchanged for a number of Canopy Growth Shares equal to (i) the volume-weighted average trading price of the Floating Shares on the CSE (or other recognized stock exchange on which the Floating Shares are primarily traded as determined by volume) for the 30 trading day period prior to the exercise (or deemed exercise) of the Canopy Call Option, subject to a minimum amount of $6.41, divided by (ii) the volume-weighted average trading price (expressed in US$) of the Canopy Growth Shares on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) (or such other recognized stock exchange on which the Canopy Growth Shares are primarily traded if not then traded on the NYSE) for the 30 trading day period immediately prior to the exercise (or deemed exercise) of the Canopy Call Option (the “Floating Ratio”). The Floating Ratio is subject to adjustment in accordance with the Amended Plan of Arrangement if Acreage issues greater than the permitted number of Floating Shares prior to the Acquisition Date. No fractional Canopy Shares will be issued pursuant to the Amended Plan of Arrangement. The Floating Call Option cannot be exercised unless the Canopy Call Option is exercised (or deemed to be exercised). The closing of the acquisition of the Floating Shares pursuant to the Floating Call Option, if exercised, will take place concurrently with the closing of the acquisition of the Fixed Shares (the “Acquisition”) pursuant to the Canopy Call Option, if exercised. The Canopy Call Option and the Floating Call Option will expire 10 years from the Amendment Time.

 

3

 

 

At the Acquisition Time, on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Amended Plan of Arrangement, each Fixed Share Replacement Security will be exchanged for a replacement option, restricted stock unit, compensation option or warrant, as applicable, to acquire from Canopy Growth such number of Canopy Growth Shares as is equal to: (i) the number of Fixed Shares that were issuable upon exercise of such Fixed Share Replacement Security immediately prior to the Acquisition Time, multiplied by (ii) the Fixed Exchange Ratio in effect immediately prior to the Acquisition Time (provided that if the foregoing would result in the issuance of a fraction of a Canopy Growth Share, then the number of Canopy Growth Shares to be issued will be rounded down to the nearest whole number).

 

In the event that the Floating Call Option is exercised and Canopy Growth acquires the Floating Shares at the Acquisition Time, on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Amended Plan of Arrangement, each Floating Share Replacement Security will be exchanged for a replacement option, restricted stock unit, compensation option or warrant, as applicable, to acquire from Canopy Growth such number of Canopy Shares as is equal to: (i) the number of Floating Shares that were issuable upon exercise of such Floating Share Replacement Security immediately prior to the Acquisition Time, multiplied by (ii) the Floating Ratio (provided that if the foregoing would result in the issuance of a fraction of a Canopy Growth Share, then the number of Canopy Growth Shares to be issued will be rounded down to the nearest whole number).

 

In the event that Floating Call Option is exercised, and Canopy Growth acquires the Floating Shares at the Acquisition Time, we will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Canopy Growth. If Canopy Growth completes the Acquisition of the Fixed Shares but does not acquire the Floating Shares, the Floating Call Option will terminate, and the Floating Shares shall remain outstanding. In such event, the Amending Agreement provides for, among other things: (i) various Canopy Growth rights that extend beyond the Acquisition Date and continue until Canopy Growth the date (the “End Date”) Canopy Growth ceases to hold at least 35% of the issued and outstanding Acreage shares. These include, among other things, rights to nominate a majority of Acreage’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) following the Acquisition Time, and restrictions on Acreage’s ability to incur certain indebtedness without Canopy Growth’s consent

 

The Amending Agreement also provides that Acreage may issue a maximum of 32,700,000 shares (or convertible securities in proportion to the foregoing), which will include (i) 3,700,000 Floating Shares which are to be issued solely in connection with the exercise of stock options granted to Acreage management (the “Option Shares”); (ii) 8,700,000 Floating Shares other than the Option Shares; and (iii) 20,300,000 Fixed Shares, without a revision to the Fixed Exchange Ratio. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Amending Agreement provides that Acreage may not issue any equity securities, without Canopy Growth’s prior consent, other than: (i) upon the exercise or conversion of convertible securities outstanding as of the Amendment Date; (ii) contractual commitments existing as of the Amendment Date; (iii) the Option Shares; (iv) the issuance of up to $3.0 million worth of Fixed Shares pursuant to an at-the-market offering to be completed no more than four times during any one-year period; (v) the issuance of up to 500,000 Fixed Shares in connection with debt financing transactions that are otherwise in compliance with the terms of the Arrangement Agreement, as amended by the Amending Agreement; or (vi) pursuant to one private placement or public offering of securities during any one-year period for aggregate gross proceeds of up to $20.0 million, subject to specific limitations as set out in the Amending Agreement.

 

For more information, please refer to the Amending Agreement included as an exhibit to this Registration Statement.

 

Pursuant to the Amending Agreement, Acreage agreed to submit an Approved Business Plan to Canopy Growth on a quarterly basis that complies with certain specified criteria, including a business plan for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2020 through December 31, 2029 attached as a Schedule to the Proposal Agreement (the “Initial Business Plan”). The Initial Business Plan contains annual revenue and earnings targets for each of Acreage’s fiscal years ending on December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2029, as outlined below:

 

Fiscal Year Ending     Pro-Forma Net Revenue Target
(in US$000’s)
    Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Target (in US$000’s)  
2020       166,174       (22,499 )
2021       253,296       36,720  
2022       289,528       53,222  
2023       375,274       102,799  
2024       558,599       166,744  
2025       641,047       190,385  
2026       740,194       218,108  
2027       848,498       244,402  
2028       973,402       273,434  
2029       1,120,177       305,840  

 

4

 

 

A number of factors may cause Acreage to fail to meet the Pro-Forma Net Revenue Targets or the Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Targets set forth in the Initial Business Plan and outlined above. See “Risk Factors”.

 

In the event that Acreage has not satisfied: (i) 90% of the Pro-Forma Net Revenue Target or the Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Target set forth in the Initial Business Plan, measured on a quarterly basis, an Interim Failure to Perform will occur and the Austerity Measures shall become applicable. The Austerity Measures include, among other things:

 

(a) restrictions on Acreage’s ability to issue shares (or securities convertible into shares) other than:

 

(i) upon the exercise or conversion of convertible securities outstanding as such date; and

 

(ii) contractual commitments existing as of the;

 

(b) prohibitions on entering into any contract in respect of Company Debt, other than in respect of trade payables or similar obligations incurred in the ordinary course;

 

(c) granting any options to acquire Fixed Shares or Floating Shares;

 

(d) making payments of fees owed to the Board;

 

(e) making short-term incentive or bonus payments to any Acreage employee;

 

(f) entering into any contract with respect to the disposition of any assets other than inventory in the ordinary course;

 

(g) entering into any contract with respect to any business combination, merger or acquisition of assets, other than assets acquired in the ordinary course;

 

(h) making any new capital investments or incurring any new capital expenditures; and

 

(i) increasing the number of Acreage employees that have a base salary of $150,000 or more or more than five full time employees that would be included in corporate overhead expenditures.

 

The Austerity Measures provide significant restrictions on Acreage’s ability to take certain actions otherwise permitted by the Amended Arrangement Agreement; (ii) 80% of the Pro-Forma Net Revenue Target or the Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Target set forth in the Initial Business Plan, as determined on an annual basis (commencing in respect of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021), a Material Failure to Perform will occur and (a) certain restrictive covenants applicable to Canopy Growth under the Amended Arrangement Agreement will cease to apply in order to permit Canopy Growth to acquire, or conditionally acquire, a competitor of the Company in the United States should it wish to do so, and (b) an event of default under the Debenture will likely occur resulting in the Hempco Loan becoming immediately due and payable; and (iii) 60% of the Pro-Forma Net Revenue Target or the Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Target set forth in the Initial Business Plan for the trailing 12 month period ending on the date that is 30 days prior to the proposed Acquisition Time, a Failure to Perform shall occur and a material adverse impact will be deemed to have occurred for purposes of Section 6.2(2)(h) of the Arrangement Agreement and Canopy Growth will not be required to complete the Acquisition of the Fixed Shares pursuant to the Canopy Call Option.

 

5

 

 

Recent Developments

 

Standby Equity Distribution Agreement and Commitment Shares

 

On May 29, 2020, we entered into a standby equity distribution agreement (the “Standby Equity Distribution Agreement” or “SEDA”) with SAFMB Concord LP (the “Institutional Investor”), pursuant to which we may, in our discretion, periodically sell to the Institutional Investor, and pursuant to which the Institutional Investor may, at its discretion, require us to sell to it, up to $35.0 million Fixed Shares and up to $15.0 million Floating Shares. For each Fixed Share or Floating Share purchased under the SEDA, the Institutional Investor will pay us the greater of (i) 95% of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares on the CSE or other principal market on which the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares are traded (the “Principal Market”) for the five consecutive trading days immediately following the date we or the Institutional Investor delivers notice requiring the Institutional Investor to purchase or us to sell the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares under the SEDA; or (ii) the lowest price allowable under the rules of the Principal Market.

 

As of the date of this Prospectus, we have not drawn down against the SEDA. It is a condition of the Institutional Investor’s obligation to purchase our shares under the SEDA that we borrow an amount equal to the amount of the purchase price for the shares requested to be sold under a credit agreement with the Institutional Investor, and all conditions precedent to such borrowing under such credit agreement are satisfied prior to completion of the sale of any such shares under the SEDA.

 

The Institutional Investor’s obligation to purchase, and our obligation to sell, Fixed Shares and Floating Shares under the SEDA is subject to certain conditions, including obtaining requisite relief from applicable Canadian securities regulators in respect of transactions of this nature, us filing and maintaining the effectiveness of a registration statement, and a supplement to our Canadian shelf prospectus, qualifying the issue of the commitment shares described below and up to an aggregate of $35.0 million of Fixed Shares and $15.0 million of Floating Shares sold under the SEDA, and is limited to $500,000 per advance.

 

6

 

 

On each of September 28, 2020 and January 25, 2021, the Company entered into letter agreements (the “Letter Agreements”) with the institutional investor extending the termination deadline of the SEDA to the earliest of November 30, 2020 and June 30, 2021, respectively, and the date that the Company has obtained both a receipt from the Ontario Securities Commission for a short-form final base shelf prospectus and a declaration from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission that its registration statement is effective, in each case qualifying an At-The-Market equity offering program. On March 11, 2021, the SEDA termination deadline was further extended to April 15, 2022.

 

Appointment of New Director

 

On January 11, 2021, we announced that Katie Bayne was appointed to our Board of Directors and Audit Committee.

 

Compass Neuroceuticals Litigation

 

In February 2021, a JAMS arbitration was initiated in Atlanta by Acreage Georgia LLC (“Acreage Georgia”), a subsidiary of the Company, against its former consultant, Compass Neuroceuticals, Inc. (“Compass”), stemming from Compass’ breach of the consulting agreement entered into between the parties in June 2019, related to the preparation of an application for a Class 1 cultivation license in Georgia. Acreage Georgia is alleging damages, including lost profits, of approximately $9.0 million. Compass filed counterclaims for breach, also in the $9.0 million range. A final arbitration hearing is currently scheduled for August 2021. The matter is in its early stages, therefore, it is too early to ascertain the materiality of any potential settlement or judgment, but the Company plans to defend itself vigorously in this matter.

 

Sale of Acreage Florida

 

On February 25, 2021, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell its ownership interests in Acreage Florida, Inc. (“Acreage Florida”) for an aggregate purchase price of $60.0 million. Acreage Florida is licensed to operate medical marijuana dispensaries, a processing facility and a cultivation facility in the state of Florida. The agreement also includes the sale of property in Sanderson, Florida. The aggregate purchase price includes an upfront cash payment of $5.0 million, an additional $20.0 million in cash, $7.0 million of the buyer’s common stock and the issuance of $28.0 million in promissory notes upon the closing of the transaction expected in the second quarter of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions, including the procurement of all necessary approvals for the transfer to the buyer of the Florida license for the operation of medical marijuana businesses.

 

3.55% Credit facility and collateral

 

On March 7, 2021, the Company extended the maturity date related to our $22.0 million in borrowings pursuant to a loan transaction with IP Investment Company, LLC to March 31, 2021, which operates as cash collateral for the credit facility with an institutional lender. On March 29, 2021, the Company further extended the maturity date of Tranche B of the loan transaction with IP Investment Company, which is $21.0 million of the $22.0 million aggregate amount of the loan transaction, to June 30, 2021.

 

On March 11, 2021, the Company accelerated the maturity date related to its $21.0 million in borrowings pursuant to a loan transaction with an institutional investor to June 15, 2021, related to the loan described above with IP Investment Company, LLC. Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 for further discussion.

 

The Securities Offered under this Prospectus

 

A. Warrants Issued in February 2020

 

On February 10, 2020, we closed an offering made pursuant to an agency agreement dated February 10, 2020 between us and Canaccord Genuity Corp. (the “February 2020 Offering”). The February 2020 Offering consisted of (i) 6,085,192 special warrants (the “Special Warrants”) and (ii) up to 4,056,795 units issuable upon the exercise of an option granted to the lead purchaser (“Additional Units”). The Special Warrants were automatically converted into units (“Initial Units”) each comprised of one SVS and one SVS purchase warrant (each, an “Initial Warrant”). Each Additional Unit is comprised of one SVS and one SVS purchase warrant.

 

7

 

 

In connection with the Amended Arrangement, we and the Warrant Agent entered into the Supplemental Indenture to amend the Warrant Indenture. In accordance with the Supplemental Indenture, each outstanding Warrant at the Amendment Time, of which there were 6,085,192, was exchanged for: (i) 0.7 of a Fixed Warrant; and (ii) 0.3 of a Floating Warrant. Upon completion of the Amended Arrangement, there were 4,259,633 Fixed Warrants and 1,825,556 Floating Warrants outstanding, each having an exercise price of $4.00.

 

This Prospectus registers the resale the Fixed Shares and Floating Shares now underlying the February Warrants offered as part of the February 2020 Offering.

 

B. Loan Transaction

 

On February 7, 2020, we entered into a credit agreement (the “February Credit Agreement”) through our subsidiary, HSCP CN Holdings ULC (the “Borrower”), by and among the Borrower, Acreage Finance Delaware, LLC (the “Guarantor”), and the institutional lender party thereto and its administrative agent.

 

The February Credit Agreement provides for a secured credit facility in the amount of up to $100.0 million, which may be drawn down on by the Borrower in three tranches, maturing on the date that is two years from the date the first tranche is drawn down on. The obligations under the February Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the Guarantor, and secured by a first priority lien (the “Security Interest”) over $50.0 million in cash deposited in a bank account by us (the “Restricted Account”).

 

In order to fund the Restricted Account, on March 6, 2020, our subsidiary, the IP Borrower entered into the Original Credit Agreement, which provided for a credit facility in the amount of up to $50.0 million (“Credit Facility”) to be available in two advances. The maturity date for the first advance of borrowings under the March Credit Agreement, subject to acceleration in certain instances, is 366 days from the closing date of the Credit Facility. All funds drawn under the Credit Facility are required to be deposited into the Restricted Account as security for repayment of funds borrowed and amounts owing pursuant to the February Credit Agreement.

 

On March 11, 2020, IP Borrower drew the first advance of $22.0 million (the “Borrowed Amount”) under the Original Credit Agreement and deposited the funds into the Restricted Account (the “Loan Transaction”). Kevin Murphy, our Chair and former Chief Executive Officer, loaned $21.0 million of the Borrowed Amount to the IP Lender in connection with the Loan Transaction (the “Murphy Amount”).

 

Interest on the principal amount borrowed under the Credit Facility was to be satisfied by the IP Borrower delivering to the IP Lender 83,333 SVS per month (or 58,333 Fixed Shares and 24,999 Floating Shares), or 1,000,000 SVS (or 700,000 Fixed Shares and 300,000 Floating Shares) in the aggregate (the “Interest Shares”). We were advised that Mr. Murphy was not a member, an officer nor a director of IP Lender and that Mr. Murphy was entitled to receive, assuming full repayment of the Borrowed Amount at maturity, $23.1 million along with up to 304,001 SVS, forming part of the Interest Shares, which entitlement to Interest Shares he forfeited in accordance with the Amended Arrangement.

 

8

 

 

In connection with, and as a condition to the implementation of, the Amended Arrangement, the Original Credit Agreement was amended in accordance with the Credit Agreement Amendment. The Credit Agreement Amendment provides that: (i) with respect to the Murphy Amount, effective as of the Amendment Time, the Original Credit Agreement was amended to (a) remove any entitlement to “Interest Shares” (as defined in the Original Credit Agreement) in respect of this amount, (b) provide for an interest rate of 12% per annum payable in cash, (c) amend Section 9.3 of the Original Credit Agreement to amend the obligation of IP Borrower to cause us to sell up to 8,800,000 SVS to repay the amount outstanding such that the obligation was reduced to cause the issuance of up to 2,000,000 Fixed Shares, and (ii) with respect to $1.0 million of the principal amount advanced pursuant to the Original Credit Agreement, the lender is entitled to (a) 16,799 Fixed Shares and 7,199 Floating Shares, (b) upon maturity of the Original Credit Agreement, a return of $1.1 million and (c) otherwise be treated in accordance with the current terms of the Original Credit Agreement.

 

IP Lender was entitled to 23,999 SVS under the Original Credit Agreement, of which 12,000 SVS were issued to IP Lender prior to the Capital Reorganization. The 12,000 SVS issued to IP Lender prior to the Capital Reorganization were subsequently transferred to Pilgrim Foresight Fund, LLC (“Pilgrim”), an affiliate of IP Lender, pursuant to applicable securities laws. Subsequent to the Capital Reorganization, the SVS originally issued to IP Lender and currently held by Pilgrim were exchanged for 8,400 Fixed Shares and 3,600 Floating Shares. In accordance with the Credit Agreement Amendment, IP Lender received an additional 8,399 Fixed Shares and 3,599 Floating Shares, with such shares replacing the 11,999 SVS IP Lender was entitled to pursuant to the Original Credit Agreement. Upon the extension of the maturity of the portion of the Loan Transaction held by the IP Lender to March 31, 2021, we issued an additional 1,181 Fixed Shares and 506 Floating Shares to the IP Lender.

 

This Prospectus registers the resale of the 17,980 Fixed Shares and 7,705 Floating Shares by Pilgrim in connection with the Loan Transaction (the “Loan Shares”). We will not receive any cash proceeds from the sale of the Loan Shares.

 

C. Warrants Issued in November 2020

 

On November 3, 2020, we announced that we had received initial commitments and funding from the Term Loan Lenders for a first advance of $28.0 million under the Facility at an annual interest rate of 15% with a maturity of 48 months from closing.

 

In connection with the advance, we issued the lenders an aggregate of 1,556,929 November Fixed Warrants with each November Fixed Warrant exercisable for one Fixed Share and 697,666 November Floating Warrants with each November Floating Warrant exercisable for one Floating Share. The exercise price of each November Fixed Share Warrant is $3.15 and the exercise price of each November Floating Share Warrant is $3.01. The November Warrants are exercisable for a period of four years.

 

Fixed Shares

 

Holders of Fixed Shares are entitled to notice of and to attend at any meeting of our shareholders, except a meeting at which only holders of another particular class or series of our shares shall have the right to vote. At each such meeting, holders of Fixed Shares are entitled to one vote in respect of each Fixed Share held.

 

Any Fixed Shares resold pursuant to this Prospectus will be subject in all respects to the Canopy Call Option to acquire such Fixed Shares.

 

Our Fixed Shares are described in greater detail in this Prospectus under “Description of Fixed Shares.”

 

Floating Shares

 

Holders of Floating Shares are entitled to notice of and to attend at any meeting of our shareholders, except a meeting at which only holders of another particular class or series of our shares shall have the right to vote. At each such meeting, holders of Floating Shares are entitled to one vote in respect of each Floating Share held.

 

Any Floating Shares resold pursuant to this Prospectus will be subject in all respects to the Floating Call Option to acquire such Floating Shares.

 

Our Floating Shares are described in greater detail in this Prospectus under “Description of Floating Shares.”

 

Risk Factors

 

See “Risk Factors,” as well as other information included in this Prospectus, for a discussion of factors you should read and consider carefully before investing in our securities.

 

Corporate Information

 

Our principal executive offices are located at 450 Lexington Avenue, #3308 New York, New York 10163 and our telephone number is (646) 600-9181.

 

9

 

 

THE OFFERING

 

Fixed Shares Offered by Selling Security Holders

4,259,633 Fixed Shares issuable upon exercise of the February Fixed Warrants. Each February Fixed Warrant has an exercise price of $4.00 per share, has been exercisable since issuance and will expire five years from the issuance date.

 

17,980 Fixed Shares comprised in the Commitment Shares

 

1,556,929 Fixed Shares issuable upon exercise of the November Fixed Warrants. Each November Fixed Warrant has an exercise price of $3.15 per share, has been exercisable since issuance and will expire four years from the issuance date.

   
Floating Shares Offered by Selling Security Holders

1,825,556 Floating Shares issuable upon exercise of the February Floating Warrants. Each February Floating Warrant has an exercise price of $4.00 per share, has been exercisable since issuance and will expire five years from the issuance date.

 

7,705 Floating Shares comprised in the Commitment Shares.

 

697,666 Floating Shares issuable upon exercise of the November Floating Warrants. Each November Floating Warrant has an exercise price of $3.01 per share, has been exercisable since issuance and will expire four years from the issuance date.

   
Fixed Shares To Be Outstanding After This Offering If All Fixed Warrants Are Exercised 78,334,284 Fixed Shares.
   
Floating Shares To Be Outstanding After This Offering If All Floating Warrants Are Exercised 34,171,655 Floating Shares.
   
Use Of Proceeds

All proceeds from the sale of Fixed Shares and Floating Shares offered hereby will be for the account of the Selling Security Holders. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of Fixed Share or Floating Shares offered pursuant to this Prospectus. Assuming the exercise of all of the previously issued Warrants, we will receive gross proceeds of $31,345,056. We do not expect to pay any expenses in connection with the exercise of any the Warrants.

 

The net proceeds from the exercise of the Warrants will be used to fund our working capital and for general corporate purposes.

 

See “Use of Proceeds” on page 39.

   
Risk Factors This investment involves a high degree of risk. You should read the “Risk Factors” section of this Prospectus and of any free writing prospectus we authorize for use in connection with this offering for a discussion of factors to consider before deciding to purchase Fixed Shares or Floating Shares.
   
Trading Symbol The Fixed Shares are currently listed on the CSE under the trading symbol “ACRG.A.U”, quoted on the OTCQX under the trading symbol “ACRHF”, and traded on the FRA under the trading symbol “0VZ1”. The Floating Shares are currently listed on the CSE under the trading symbol “ACRG.B.U”, quoted on the OTCQX under the trading symbol “ACRDF”, and traded on the FRA under the trading symbol “0VZ2”.

 

The number of Fixed Shares shown above to be outstanding after this offering is based on 72,517,722 Fixed Shares outstanding (including 589,165 Fixed Shares held by Acreage Holdings America, Inc. (the “Acreage Subsidiary”)) as of April 1, 2021, and excludes 909,244 Fixed Shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

 

10

 

 

The number of Floating Shares shown above to be outstanding after this offering is based on 31,648,433 Floating Shares outstanding (including 252,499 Floating Shares held by the Acreage Subsidiary) as of April 1, 2021, and excludes 1,382,582 Floating Shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

 

Under our equity compensation plan, we are entitled to issue up to 15% of the aggregate fixed and floating shares outstanding from time to time. As of April 1, 2021, there were approximately 8.7 million shares available for issuance under our equity compensation plan.

 

11

 

 

SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA

 

The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data for the periods, and as of the dates, indicated. The (i) consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and (ii) consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Acreage Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The information set forth below for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 2017 is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations, and should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this prospectus to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of the information presented below.

 

Selected Financial Data

 

    Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands, except per share amounts)   2020     2019     2018     2017  
Revenues, net   $ 114,545     $ 74,109     $ 21,124     $ 7,743  
Net operating loss     (364,811 )     (191,444 )     (41,133 )     (7,047 )
Net loss     (360,118 )     (195,162 )     (32,261 )     (9,536 )
Net loss attributable to Acreage     (150,268       (150,268 )     (27,483 )     (8,543 )
Net loss per share attributable to Acreage, basic and diluted     (2.87 )     (1.74 )     (0.41 )     (0.19 )
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted     99,980       86,185       66,699       45,076  

 

    December 31,  
    2020     2019     2018  
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 32,542     $ 26,505     $ 104,943  
Total assets     562,053       691,677       554,582  
Total long-term liabilities     204,602       139,730       35,447  

 

12

 

 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference herein contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable United States securities legislation (“forward-looking statements”), including the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based upon our current beliefs, expectations, and assumptions regarding the future of the business, future plans and strategies, and other future conditions. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the words such as “expect”, “likely”, “may”, “will”,, “would”, “could”, “should”, “continue”, “contemplate”, “intend”, or “anticipate”, “believe”, “envision”, “estimate”, “expect”, “plan”, “predict”, “project”, “target”, “potential”, “proposed”, “estimate” and other similar words, including negative and grammatical variations thereof, or statements that certain events or conditions “may” or “will” happen, or by discussions of strategy. Forward-looking statements include estimates, plans, expectations, opinions, forecasts, projections, targets, guidance, or other statements that are not statements of fact. Such forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Prospectus. Forward-looking statements in this Prospectus include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to:

 

the future implications to the business, financial results and performance of the Company arising, directly or indirectly, from COVID-19;
the anticipated benefits of the Amended Arrangement with Canopy Growth, as defined below;
the occurrence or waiver of the Triggering Event, as defined below, the ability of Acreage to meets its performance targets and financial thresholds agreed upon with Canopy Growth as part of the Amended Arrangement;
the likelihood of the Triggering Event occurring or being waived by the outside date;
the likelihood of Canopy Growth completing the acquisition of the Fixed Shares and/or Floating Shares;
risks related to the ability of the Company to finance its business and fund its obligations;
other expectations and assumptions concerning the transactions contemplated between Canopy Growth and Acreage;
the available funds of Acreage and the anticipated use of such funds;
the availability of financing opportunities for Acreage and the risks associated with the completion thereof;
regulatory and licensing risks;
changes in general economic, business and political conditions, including changes in the financial and stock markets;
risks related to infectious diseases, including the impacts of COVID-19;
legal and regulatory risks inherent in the cannabis industry;
risks associated with economic conditions, dependence on management and currency risk;
risks relating to U.S. regulatory landscape and enforcement related to cannabis, including political risks;
risks relating to anti-money laundering laws and regulation;
other governmental and environmental regulation;
public opinion and perception of the cannabis industry;
risks related to contracts with third-party service providers;
risks related to the enforceability of contracts and lack of access to U.S. bankruptcy protections;
reliance on the expertise and judgment of senior management of Acreage;
risks related to proprietary intellectual property and potential infringement by third parties;
the concentrated voting control of Acreage’s founder and the unpredictability caused by Acreage’s capital structure;
risks relating to the management of growth;
increasing competition in the industry;
risks inherent in an agricultural business;
risks relating to energy costs;
risks associated with cannabis products manufactured for human consumption including potential product recalls;
reliance on key inputs, suppliers and skilled labor;
cybersecurity risks;
ability and constraints on marketing products;
fraudulent activity by employees, contractors and consultants;
tax and insurance related risks;
risks related to the economy generally;
risk of litigation;
conflicts of interest;
risks relating to certain remedies being limited and the difficulty of enforcement judgments and effecting service outside of Canada;
risks related to future acquisitions or dispositions;
sales by existing shareholders;
limited research and data relating to cannabis

 

as well as those risk factors described under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference herein and therein and as described from time to time in documents filed by us with securities regulatory authorities. A description of additional assumptions used to develop such forward-looking statements and a description of additional risk factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements can be found in Part I, Item 1A under the heading “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 dated March 25, 2021.

 

Readers are cautioned that the above list of cautionary statements is not exhaustive. A number of factors could cause actual events, performance or results to differ materially from what is projected in forward-looking statements. The purpose of forward-looking statements is to provide the reader with a description of management’s expectations, and such forward-looking statements may not be appropriate for any other purpose. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained in this Prospectus. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. The forward-looking statements contained in this Prospectus are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. Potential purchasers of our securities should read this entire Prospectus, and consult their own professional advisors to ascertain and assess the income tax and legal risks and other aspects associated with holding our securities.

 

13

 

 

RISK FACTORS

 

Before deciding to invest in our securities, prospective investors in our securities should consider carefully the risk factors and the other information contained in this Prospectus relating to a specific offering of our securities.

 

Before making an investment decision, prospective purchasers of our securities should carefully consider the information described in this Prospectus. Some of the risk factors described herein are interrelated and, consequently, investors should treat such risk factors as a whole. If any event arising from these risks occurs, our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and the investor’s investment in our securities could be materially adversely affected. Additional risks and uncertainties of which we are currently unaware or that are unknown or that we currently consider to be immaterial could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation. We cannot assure an investor that we will successfully address any or all of these risks.

 

Risks Specifically Related to Regulatory Matters

 

The Company’s Business Activities are Illegal under U.S. Federal Law.

 

Cannabis (with the exception of hemp containing no more than 0.3% THC by dry weight) is illegal under U.S. federal law. In those states in which the use of cannabis has been legalized, its use remains a violation of federal law pursuant to the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (the “CSA”). The CSA classifies marijuana (cannabis) as a Schedule I controlled substance, and as such, medical and adult use cannabis consumption is illegal under U.S. federal law. Unless and until Congress amends the CSA with respect to cannabis (and the President approves such amendment), there is a risk that federal authorities may enforce current federal law. If that occurs, the Subsidiaries or other entities in which the Company may have an interest from time to time may be deemed to be producing, cultivating or dispensing cannabis and drug paraphernalia in violation of federal law, or the Company may be deemed to be facilitating the selling or distribution of cannabis and drug paraphernalia in violation of federal law with respect to the Company’s investment in the Subsidiaries. Since federal law criminalizing the use of cannabis preempts state laws that legalize its use, strict enforcement of federal law regarding cannabis is a significant risk which would greatly harm the Company’s business, prospects, results of operation, and financial condition. As all of our operations are cannabis-related and conducted in the United States, our balance sheet and operating statement exposure to U.S. marijuana related activities is 100% in each case.

 

The activities of the Subsidiaries are, and will continue to be, subject to evolving regulation by governmental authorities. The Subsidiaries are directly or indirectly engaged in the medical and adult use cannabis industry in the U.S. where such activities are permitted under state law. The legality of the production, cultivation, extraction, distribution, retail sales, transportation and use of cannabis differs between states in the U.S. Due to the current regulatory environment in the U.S., new risks may emerge, and management may not be able to predict all such risks.

 

There are 37 states in the U.S., in addition to Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, that have laws and/or regulations that recognize, in one form or another, legitimate medical uses for cannabis and consumer use of cannabis in connection with medical treatment. Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, Washington, D.C., the Northern Mariana Islands and Guam have legalized cannabis for adult use.

 

The funding by the Company of the activities of the Subsidiaries involved in the medical and adult use cannabis industry through equity investments, loans or other forms of investment, may be illegal under the applicable federal laws of the U.S. and other applicable laws. There can be no assurances that the federal government of the U.S. or other jurisdictions will not seek to enforce the applicable laws against the Company. The consequences of such enforcement would be materially adverse to the Company and the Company’s business, including its reputation, profitability, the market price of its publicly traded shares, and could result in the forfeiture or seizure of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

 

The U.S. administration under President Obama attempted to address the inconsistent treatment of cannabis under state and federal law in the Cole Memorandum which Deputy Attorney General James Cole sent to all U.S. Attorneys in August 2013 that outlined certain priorities for the DOJ relating to the prosecution of cannabis offenses. The Cole Memorandum held that enforcing federal cannabis laws and regulations in jurisdictions that have enacted laws legalizing cannabis in some form and that have also implemented strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems to control the cultivation, processing, distribution, sale and possession of cannabis, conduct in compliance with those laws and regulations was not a priority for the DOJ. Instead, the Cole Memorandum directed U.S. Attorney’s Offices discretion not to investigate or prosecute state law compliant participants in the medical cannabis industry who did not implicate certain identified federal government priorities, including preventing interstate diversion or distribution of cannabis to minors.

 

14

 

 

On January 4, 2018, then U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions formally issued the Sessions Memorandum, which rescinded the Cole Memorandum effective upon its issuance. The Sessions Memorandum stated, in part, that current law reflects “Congress’ determination that cannabis is a dangerous drug and cannabis activity is a serious crime”, and Mr. Sessions directed all U.S. Attorneys to enforce the laws enacted by Congress and to follow well-established principles that govern all federal prosecutions when deciding whether to pursue prosecutions related to cannabis activities. As a result, federal prosecutors could, and still can, use their prosecutorial discretion to decide to prosecute actors compliant with their state laws. Although there have not been any identified prosecutions of state law compliant cannabis entities, there can be no assurance that the federal government will not enforce federal laws relating to cannabis in the future. Jeff Sessions resigned as U.S. Attorney General on November 7, 2018. On February 14, 2019, William Barr was confirmed as U.S. Attorney General. However, in a written response to questions from U.S. Senator Cory Booker made as a nominee, Attorney General Barr stated “I do not intend to go after parties who have complied with state law in reliance on the Cole Memo.” Nonetheless, there is no guarantee that state laws legalizing and regulating the sale and use of cannabis will not be repealed or overturned, or that local governmental authorities will not limit the applicability of state laws within their respective jurisdictions. Unless and until the United States Congress amends the CSA with respect to cannabis (and as to the timing or scope of any such potential amendments there can be no assurance), there is a risk that federal authorities may enforce current U.S. federal law.

 

The Department of Justice under Mr. Barr did not take a formal position on federal enforcement of laws relating to cannabis. Mr. Barr has stated publicly that his preference would be to have a uniform federal rule against cannabis, but, absent such a uniform rule, his preference would be to permit the existing federal approach of leaving it up to the states to make their own decisions.

 

President Biden has nominated Merrick Garland to serve as Attorney General in his administration. It is not yet known whether the Department of Justice under President Biden and Attorney General Garland will re-adopt the Cole Memorandum or announce a substantive cannabis enforcement policy. If the Department of Justice policy under Attorney General Garland were to aggressively pursue financiers or owners of cannabis-related businesses, and United States Attorneys followed such Department of Justice policies through pursuing prosecutions, then the Company could face (i) seizure of its cash and other assets used to support or derived from its cannabis operations, (ii) the arrest of its employees, directors, officers, managers and investors, and charges of ancillary criminal violations of the CSA for aiding and abetting and conspiring to violate the CSA by virtue of providing financial support to cannabis companies that service or provide goods to state-licensed or permitted cultivators, processors, distributors, and/or retailers of cannabis, and/or (iii) the barring of its employees, directors, officers, managers and investors who are not United States citizens from entry into the United States for life.

 

One legislative safeguard for the medical cannabis industry, appended to federal appropriations legislation, remains in place. Currently referred to as the “Rohrabacher-Blumenauer Amendment”, this so-called “rider” provision has been appended to the Consolidated Appropriations Acts for fiscal years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019. Under the terms of the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer rider, the federal government is prohibited from using congressionally appropriated funds to enforce federal cannabis laws against regulated medical cannabis actors operating in compliance with state and local law. On December 20, 2019, then President Donald Trump signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 which included the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer Amendment, which prohibits the funding of federal prosecutions with respect to medical cannabis activities that are legal under state law. On December 27, 2020, the omnibus spending bill passed including the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer Amendment, extending its application until September 30, 2021. There can be no assurances that the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer Amendment will be included in future appropriations bills to prevent the federal government from using congressionally appropriated funds to enforce federal cannabis laws against regulated medical cannabis actors operating in compliance with state and local law.

 

There is no guarantee that state laws legalizing and regulating the sale and use of cannabis will not be repealed, amended or overturned, or that local governmental authorities will not limit the applicability of state laws within their respective jurisdictions. Unless and until the United States Congress amends or repeals the CSA with respect to medical and/or adult-use cannabis (and as to the timing or scope of any such potential amendment or repeal there can be no assurance), there is a significant risk that federal authorities may enforce current federal law. If the federal government begins to enforce federal laws relating to cannabis in states where the sale and use of cannabis is currently legal, or if existing applicable state laws are repealed or curtailed, the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects would be materially adversely affected.

 

Marijuana (cannabis) remains a Schedule I controlled substance under the CSA, and neither the Cole Memorandum nor its rescission nor the continued passage of the Rohrabacher/Blumenauer Amendment has altered that fact. The federal government of the United States has always reserved the right to enforce federal law in regard to the sale and disbursement of medical or adult-use marijuana, even if state law sanctions such sale and disbursement. If the United States federal government begins to enforce United States federal laws relating to cannabis in states where the sale and use of cannabis is currently legal, or if existing applicable state laws are repealed or curtailed, the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects would be materially adversely affected.

 

The uncertainty of U.S. federal enforcement practices going forward and the inconsistency between U.S. federal and state laws and regulations presents major risks for the business and operations of the Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries.

 

Nature of the Business Model

 

Since the cultivation, processing, production, distribution, and sale of cannabis for any purpose, medical, adult use or otherwise, remain illegal under U.S. federal law, it is possible that any of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries may be forced to cease activities. The United States federal government, through, among others, the DOJ, its sub agency the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), has the right to actively investigate, audit and shut down cannabis growing facilities, processors and retailers. The U.S. federal government may also attempt to seize the property of the Company, High Street or any Subsidiary. Any action taken by the DOJ, the DEA and/or the IRS to interfere with, seize, or shut down the operations of the Company, High Street or any Subsidiary will have an adverse effect on their businesses, operating results and financial condition.

 

15

 

  

U.S. State Regulatory Uncertainty

 

There is no assurance that state laws legalizing and regulating the sale and use of cannabis will not be repealed, amended or overturned, or that local governmental authorities will not limit the applicability of state laws within their respective jurisdictions. If the U.S. federal government begins to enforce U.S. federal laws relating to cannabis in states where the sale and use of cannabis is currently legal, or if existing state laws are repealed or curtailed, the Company’s business or operations in those states or under those laws would be materially and adversely affected. Federal actions against any individual or entity engaged in the cannabis industry or a substantial repeal of cannabis related legislation could adversely affect the Company, its business and its assets or investments.

 

Certain U.S. states where medical and/or adult use cannabis is legal have or are considering special taxes or fees on the cannabis industry. It is uncertain at this time whether other states are in the process of reviewing such additional taxes and fees. The implementation of special taxes or fees could have a material adverse effect upon the businesses, results of operations and financial condition of the Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries.

 

The Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries are Subject to Applicable Anti-Money Laundering Laws and Regulations

 

The Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries are subject to a variety of laws and regulations domestically in the U.S. that involve money laundering, financial record-keeping and proceeds of crime, including the U.S. Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970 (commonly known as the “Bank Secrecy Act”), as amended by Title III of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “USA Patriot Act”), and the rules and regulations thereunder, and any related or similar rules, regulations or guidelines, issued, administered or enforced by governmental authorities in the U.S.. The Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries are also subject to similar laws and regulations in Canada, including the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (Canada), as amended. Further, under U.S. federal law, banks or other financial institutions that provide a cannabis business with a checking account, debit or credit card, small business loan, or any other service could be found guilty of money laundering, aiding and abetting, or conspiracy.

 

Despite these laws, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) issued a memorandum on February 14, 2014 (the “FinCEN Memorandum”) outlining the pathways for financial institutions to bank state-sanctioned cannabis businesses in compliance with federal enforcement priorities. The FinCEN Memorandum echoed the enforcement priorities of the Cole Memorandum. Under these guidelines, financial institutions must submit a Suspicious Activity Report (“SAR”) in connection with all cannabis-related banking activities by any client of such financial institution, in accordance with federal money laundering laws. These cannabis-related SARs are divided into three categories - cannabis limited, cannabis priority, and cannabis terminated - based on the financial institution’s belief that the business in question follows state law, is operating outside of compliance with state law, or where the banking relationship has been terminated, respectively.

 

The FinCEN Memorandum states that in some circumstances, it is permissible for banks to provide services to cannabis-related businesses without risking prosecution for violation of federal money laundering laws. It refers to supplementary guidance included in the Cole Memorandum.

 

The rescission of the Cole Memorandum has not yet affected the status of the FinCEN Memorandum, nor has the Department of the Treasury given any indication that it intends to rescind the FinCEN Memorandum itself.

 

Although the FinCEN Memorandum remains intact, it is unclear whether the current administration will continue to follow the guidelines of the FinCEN Memorandum. The DOJ continues to have the right and power to prosecute crimes committed by banks and financial institutions, such as money laundering and violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, that occur in any state including states that have in some form legalized the sale of cannabis. Further, the conduct of the DOJ’s enforcement priorities could change for any number of reasons. A change in the DOJ’s priorities could result in the DOJ’s prosecuting banks and financial institutions for crimes that were not previously prosecuted.

 

If any of the operations of High Street or any of the Subsidiaries, or any proceeds thereof, any dividend distributions or any profits or revenues derived from these operations were found to be in violation of money laundering legislation or otherwise, such transactions may be viewed as proceeds from a crime under one or more of the statutes noted above. This may restrict the ability of the Company, High Street or any of the Subsidiaries to declare or pay dividends or effect other distributions.

 

16

 

 

Restricted Access to Banking

 

In February 2014, FinCEN issued the FinCEN Memorandum (which is not law) which provides guidance with respect to financial institutions providing banking services to cannabis business, including burdensome due diligence expectations and reporting requirements. This guidance does not provide any safe harbors or legal defenses from examination or regulatory or criminal enforcement actions by the DOJ, FinCEN or other federal regulators. Thus, most banks and other financial institutions in the United States do not appear to be comfortable providing banking services to cannabis-related businesses, or relying on this guidance, which can be amended or revoked at any time by the executive branch. In addition to the foregoing, banks may refuse to process debit card payments and credit card companies generally refuse to process credit card payments for cannabis-related businesses. As a result, the Company may have limited or no access to banking or other financial services in the United States. In addition, federal money laundering statutes and Bank Secrecy Act regulations discourage financial institutions from working with any organization that sells a controlled substance, regardless of whether the state it resides in permits cannabis sales. While the United States House of Representatives has passed the SAFE Banking Act, which would permit commercial banks to offer services to cannabis companies that are in compliance with state law, it remains under consideration by the Senate, and if Congress fails to pass the SAFE Banking Act, the Company’s inability, or limitations on the Company’s ability, to open or maintain bank accounts, obtain other banking services and/or accept credit card and debit card payments may make it difficult for the Company to operate and conduct its business as planned or to operate efficiently.

  

Lack of Access to U.S. Bankruptcy Protections; Other Bankruptcy Risks

 

Because cannabis remains illegal under U.S. federal law, many courts have denied cannabis businesses bankruptcy protections, thus making it very difficult for lenders to recoup their investments in the cannabis industry in the event of a bankruptcy. If the Company, High Street or any of the Subsidiaries were to experience a bankruptcy, there is no guarantee that U.S. federal bankruptcy protections would be available, which would have a material adverse effect.

 

Additionally, there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to effectively enforce its interests in High Street and its underlying Subsidiaries. A bankruptcy or other similar event related to an investment of the Company that precludes a party from performing its obligations under an agreement may have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, bankruptcy or other similar proceedings are often a complex and lengthy process, the outcome of which may be uncertain and could result in a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Heightened Scrutiny by Canadian Authorities

 

Because cannabis is illegal under U.S. federal law, the business, operations and investments of the Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries in the U.S., and any future businesses, operations and investments, may become the subject of heightened scrutiny by securities regulators, stock exchanges and other authorities in Canada. As a result, the Company may be subject to significant direct and indirect interaction with Canadian public officials. There can be no assurance that this heightened scrutiny will not in turn lead to the imposition of certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to invest or hold interests in other entities in the U.S. or any other jurisdiction, or have consequences for its stock exchange listing or Canadian reporting obligations, in addition to those described herein. See “The Company’s Business Activities are Illegal under U.S. Federal Law”.

 

On February 8, 2018, the Canadian Securities Administrators published Staff Notice 51-352 - Issuers with U.S. Marijuana-Related Activities (“Staff Notice 51-352”) describing the Canadian Securities Administrators’ disclosure expectations for specific risks facing issuers with cannabis-related activities in the U.S. Staff Notice 51-352 confirms that a disclosure-based approach remains appropriate for issuers with U.S. cannabis-related activities. Staff Notice 51-352 includes additional disclosure expectations that apply to all issuers with U.S. cannabis-related activities, including those with direct and indirect involvement in the cultivation and distribution of cannabis, as well as issuers that provide goods and services to third parties involved in the U.S. cannabis industry.

 

CDS Clearing and Depository Services Inc. (“CDS”) is Canada’s central securities depository, clearing and settling trades in the Canadian equity, fixed income and money markets. On February 8, 2018, following discussions with the Canadian Securities Administrators and recognized Canadian securities exchanges, the TMX Group, which is the owner and operator of CDS, announced the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with Aequitas NEO Exchange Inc., the CSE and the Toronto Stock Exchange confirming that it relies on such exchanges to review the conduct of listed issuers. The MOU notes that securities regulation requires that the rules of each of the exchanges must not be contrary to the public interest and that the rules of each of the exchanges have been approved by the securities regulators. Pursuant to the MOU, CDS will not ban accepting deposits of or transactions for clearing and settlement of securities of issuers with cannabis-related activities in the U.S.

 

Even though the MOU indicated that there are no plans of banning the settlement of securities of issuers with U.S. cannabis related activities through CDS, there can be no guarantee that the settlement of securities will continue in the future. If such a ban were to be implemented, it would have a material adverse effect on the ability of holders of Fixed Shares and Floating Shares to make and settle trades. In particular, the Fixed Shares and Floating Shares would become highly illiquid until an alternative (if available) was implemented, and investors would have no ability to effect a trade of the Fixed Shares and Floating Shares through the facilities of a stock exchange.

 

Constraints on Marketing Products

 

The development of the Company’s business and operating results may be hindered by applicable restrictions on sales and marketing activities imposed by government regulatory bodies for products containing cannabis or ingredients derived from cannabis, including but not limited, to the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and state regulatory agencies that may institute new regulatory requirements. The regulatory environment in the United States limits the Company’s ability to compete for market share in a manner similar to other industries. If the Company is unable to effectively market its products and compete for market share, or if the costs of compliance with government legislation and regulation cannot be absorbed through increased selling prices for its products, the Company’s sales and operating results could be adversely affected.

 

17

 

 

Reliance on Management or Consulting Services Agreements with Subsidiaries and Affiliates

 

The Company’s Subsidiaries and other affiliates provide assistance and advice regarding the medicinal cannabis business in certain cases through management services agreements entered into with state-licensed entities. Under such agreements, the Subsidiaries and affiliates perform certain management and operational services. In exchange for providing these services, the subsidiaries and affiliates receive management fees which are a key source of revenue for the Company. Payment of such fees is dependent on the continuing validity and enforceability of the relevant management services agreements. If such agreements are found to be invalid or unenforceable by regulators, whether on the basis that they relate to activities that are illegal under U.S. federal law or otherwise, or are terminated by the counter-party, this could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.

 

European Anti-Money Laundering Laws and Regulation

 

European laws, regulations and their enforcement, particularly those pertaining to anti-money laundering, relating to making and/or holding investments in cannabis-related practices or activities are in flux and vary dramatically from jurisdiction to jurisdiction across Europe (including without limitation, the United Kingdom). The enforcement of these laws and regulations and their effect on shareholders are uncertain and involve considerable risk. In the event that any of the Company’s operations, or any proceeds thereof, any dividends or distributions therefrom, or any profits or revenues accruing from such operations are found to be in violation of such laws or regulation, such transactions (including holding of shares in the Company) could expose any shareholder(s) in that jurisdiction to potential prosecution and/or criminal and civil sanction.

 

Tax Risks Related to Controlled Substances

 

Limits on U.S. deductibility of certain expenses may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Section 280E (“Section 280E”) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) prohibits businesses from deducting certain expenses associated with the trafficking of controlled substances (within the meaning of Schedule I and II of the CSA). IRS has applied Section 280E in tax audits against various cannabis businesses in the U.S. that are permitted under applicable state laws. Although the IRS issued a clarification allowing the deduction of certain expenses, the scope of such items is interpreted very narrowly, and the bulk of operating costs and general administrative costs are not permitted to be deducted. While there are currently several pending cases before various administrative and federal courts challenging these restrictions, there is no guarantee that these courts will issue an interpretation of Section 280E that is favorable to cannabis businesses.

 

If our tax filing positions were to be challenged by federal, state and local or foreign tax jurisdictions, we may not be wholly successful in defending our tax filing positions. We record reserves for unrecognized tax benefits based on our assessment of the probability of successfully sustaining tax filing positions. Management exercises significant judgment when assessing the probability of successfully sustaining tax filing positions, and in determining whether a contingent tax liability should be recorded and, if so, estimating the amount. If our tax filing positions are successfully challenged, payments could be required that are in excess of reserved amounts or we may be required to reduce the carrying amount of our net deferred tax asset, either of which result could be significant to our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Emerging Growth Company Status

 

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”). Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have elected to use this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will not be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies.

 

For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we intend to take advantage of certain other exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies including, but not limited to, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We cannot predict if investors will find our Fixed Shares and Floating Shares less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Fixed Shares and Floating Shares less attractive as a result, then there may be a less active trading market for our Fixed Shares and Floating Shares and our stock price may be more volatile.

 

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the last day of the year in which we have total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more; (ii) the last day of the year following the fifth anniversary of the first sale of the common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), expected to be December 31, 2024; (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in nonconvertible debt during the previous three years; or (iv) the date on which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer under the rules of the SEC.

 

18

 

 

Limited Trademark Protection

 

The Subsidiaries will not be able to register any U.S. federal trademarks in classes covering their cannabis-related products or services under the current state of federal law. Because producing, manufacturing, processing, possessing, distributing, and selling cannabis is illegal under the CSA, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) will not permit the registration of any trademark that does not comply with the CSA. As a result, the Subsidiaries will unlikely be able to protect their cannabis product trademarks beyond the geographic areas in which they conduct business pursuant to the relevant state’s law. The use of such trademarks outside the states in which the Subsidiaries operate by one or more other persons could have a material adverse effect on the value of such trademarks.

 

Civil Asset Forfeiture

 

Because the cannabis industry remains illegal under U.S. federal law, any real or personal property owned by participants in the cannabis industry, such as the Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries, which is used in the course of conducting such business, or any property or monies deemed to be proceeds of an illegal cannabis business, could be subject to seizure by law enforcement and subsequent civil asset forfeiture, even in the absence of a criminal charge or conviction.

 

FDA Regulation

 

Cannabis containing more than 0.3% THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) remains a Schedule I controlled substance under U.S. federal law. If the federal government reclassifies cannabis to a Schedule II controlled substance, it is possible that the FDA would regulate it under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 or under the Public Health Service Act. Additionally, the FDA may issue rules, regulations or guidance including good manufacturing practices, related to the growth, cultivation, harvesting and processing of medical cannabis. If regulated by the FDA as a drug, clinical trials would be needed to demonstrate efficacy and safety. It is also possible that the FDA would require that facilities where medical-use cannabis is grown register with the FDA and comply with certain federally prescribed regulations.

 

In addition, while the FDA has not yet pursued enforcement actions against the cannabis industry, it has sent numerous warning letters to sellers of CBD products making health claims. The FDA could turn its attention to the cannabis industry especially relating to claims of concern. In the event that some or all of these regulations or enforcement actions are imposed, what the impact this would have on the cannabis industry is unknown, including what costs, requirements and possible prohibitions may be enforced. If the Subsidiaries are unable to comply with the regulations or registration as prescribed by the FDA, it may have an adverse effect on the business, operating results and financial condition of the Company and/or High Street.

 

Laws and Regulations Affecting the Industry in which the Company Operates are Constantly Changing

 

The constant evolution of laws and regulations affecting the cannabis industry could detrimentally affect the Company. The current and proposed operations of the Subsidiaries are subject to a variety of local, state and federal medical cannabis laws and regulations relating to the manufacture, management, transportation, storage and disposal of cannabis, as well as laws and regulations relating to consumable products health and safety, the conduct of operations and the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are broad in scope and subject to evolving interpretations, which could require the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries to incur substantial costs associated with compliance or alter certain aspects of their business plans. In addition, violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt certain aspects of the business plans of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries and result in a material adverse effect on certain aspects of their planned operations. These laws and regulations are rapidly evolving and subject to change with minimal notice. Regulatory changes may adversely affect the Company's profitability or cause it to cease operations entirely. The cannabis industry may come under scrutiny or further scrutiny by the FDA, USDA, DEA, IRS, SEC, the DOJ, the Financial Industry Regulatory Advisory or other federal or applicable state or nongovernmental regulatory authorities or self-regulatory organizations that supervise or regulate the production, distribution, sale or use of cannabis for medical or adult use purposes in the United States. It is impossible to determine the extent of the impact of any new laws, regulations or initiatives that may be proposed, or whether any proposals will become law. The regulatory uncertainty surrounding the industry may adversely affect the business and operations of the Company, including without limitation, the costs to remain compliant with applicable laws and the impairment of its business or the ability to raise additional capital. In addition, the Company will not be able to predict the nature of any future laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, and it is possible that regulations may be enacted in the future that will be directly applicable to its business. For example, see the “Risk Factors - Heightened Scrutiny by Canadian Authorities” related to CDS above.

 

Limitation on Ownership of Licenses

 

In certain states, the cannabis laws and regulations limit, not only the number of cannabis licenses issued, but also the number of cannabis licenses that one person may own. For example, in Massachusetts, no person may have an ownership interest, or control over, more than three license holders in any category - cultivation, processing or dispensing. In Maryland, the Department of Health has taken the position that the law prevents having a material ownership interest in more than one license holder in any one of these three categories. In New Jersey, there are restrictions on overlapping ownership of license holders. In Florida, there are also limitations on owning more than one of the vertically-integrated medical cannabis licenses offered in that state. The Company believes that, where such restrictions apply, it may still capture significant share of revenue in the market through wholesale sales, exclusive marketing relations, provision of management or consulting services, franchising and similar arrangement with other operators. Nevertheless, such limitations on the acquisition of ownership of additional licenses within certain states may limit the Company’s ability to grow organically or to increase its market share in such states.

 

19

 

 

Risks Generally Related to the Company

 

Our Results of Operations May Continue to be Negatively Impacted by the COVID-19 Outbreak

 

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) emerged in Wuhan, China. Since then, it has spread to several other countries and infections have been reported around the world. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 a global pandemic.

 

In response to the outbreak, governmental authorities in the United States, Canada and internationally have introduced various recommendations and measures to try to limit the pandemic, including travel restrictions, border closures, non-essential business closures, quarantines, self-isolations, shelters-in-place and social distancing. The COVID-19 outbreak and the response of governmental authorities to try to limit it are having a significant impact on the private sector and individuals, including unprecedented business, employment and economic disruptions. The continued spread of COVID-19 in the United States, Canada and globally could continue to have an adverse impact on our business, operations and financial results, including through disruptions in our cultivation and processing activities, supply chains and sales channels, as well as a deterioration of general economic conditions including a possible national or global recession. Shelter-in-place orders and social distancing practices designed to limit the spread of COVID-19 may affect our retail business. Due to the speed with which the COVID-19 situation is developing and the uncertainty of its magnitude, outcome and duration, it is not possible to estimate its impact on our business, operations or financial results; however, the impact could be material. We own a cultivational, processing and wholesale license and lease a property in Medford, Oregon and in part as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we temporarily halted cultivation/processing operations in Oregon.

 

Unfavorable Publicity or Consumer Perception

 

The legal cannabis industry in the U.S. is at an early stage of its development. Cannabis has been, and is expected to continue to be, a controlled substance for the foreseeable future. Consumer perceptions regarding legality, morality, consumption, safety, efficacy and quality of cannabis are mixed and evolving. Consumer perception can be significantly influenced by scientific research or findings, regulatory investigations, litigation, media attention and other publicity regarding the consumption of cannabis products. There can be no assurance that future scientific research, findings, regulatory proceedings, litigation, media attention or other research findings or publicity will be favorable to the cannabis market or any particular product, or consistent with earlier publicity. Future research reports, findings, regulatory proceedings, litigation, media attention or other publicity that are perceived as less favorable than, or that question, earlier research reports, findings or publicity could have a material adverse effect on the demand for cannabis and on the business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows of the Subsidiaries and accordingly High Street and the Company. Further, adverse publicity, reports or other media attention regarding cannabis in general, or associating the consumption of cannabis with illness or other negative effects or events, could have such a material adverse effect.

 

Public opinion and support for medical and adult use cannabis use has traditionally been inconsistent and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. While public opinion and support appears to be rising for legalizing medical and adult use cannabis, it remains a controversial issue subject to differing opinions surrounding the level of legalization (for example, medical cannabis as opposed to legalization in general).

 

The ability to gain and increase market acceptance of the Subsidiaries’ products may require the Company, High Street and/or the Subsidiaries to establish and maintain its brand name and reputation. In order to do so, substantial expenditures on product development, strategic relationships and marketing initiatives may be required. There can be no assurance that these initiatives will be successful and their failure may have an adverse effect on the Company, High Street and/or the Subsidiaries.

 

Further, a shift in public opinion may also result in a significant influence over the regulation of the cannabis industry in Canada, the U.S. or elsewhere. A negative shift in the perception of the public with respect to medical cannabis in the U.S. or any other applicable jurisdiction could affect future legislation or regulation. Among other things, such a shift could cause state jurisdictions to abandon initiatives or proposals to legalize medical cannabis, thereby limiting the number of new state jurisdictions into which the Company could expand. Any inability to fully implement the Company’s expansion strategy may have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Limited Operating History

 

The Company presently generates losses, and will only start generating profits in future periods if at all, and accordingly, the Company is therefore expected to remain subject to many of the risks common to early-stage enterprises for the foreseeable future, including challenges related to laws, regulations, licensing, integrating and retaining qualified employees; making effective use of limited resources; achieving market acceptance of existing and future solutions; competing against companies with greater financial and technical resources; acquiring and retaining customers; and developing new solutions. There can be no assurance that the Subsidiaries will be successful in addressing these risks, and the failure to do so in any one area could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

 

20

 

 

Competition with the Company

 

There is potential that the Company will face intense competition from other companies, some of which can be expected to have longer operating histories and more financial resources and experience than the Company. Increased competition by larger and better financed competitors could materially and adversely affect the business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of the Company.

 

Because of the early stage of the industry in which the Company operates, the Company expects to face additional competition from new entrants. To become and remain competitive, the Company will require research and development, marketing, sales and support. In addition, the Company will have to establish and leverage best practices, standardize operating procedures and generate operational efficiencies through services shared among the Subsidiaries and other organizational methodologies. Pressure from the Company’s competitors may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

 

Competition with the Subsidiaries

 

There is potential that the Subsidiaries will face intense competition from other companies, some of which can be expected to have longer operating histories and more financial resources and experience than the Subsidiaries. Currently, the cannabis industry is generally comprised of individuals and small to medium-sized entities; however, the risk remains that large conglomerates and companies who also recognize the potential for financial success through investment in this industry could strategically purchase or assume control of larger dispensaries, processing plants and cultivation facilities. In doing so, these larger competitors could establish price setting and cost controls which would effectively “price out” many of the individuals and small to medium-sized entities who currently make up the bulk of the participants in the varied businesses operating within and in support of the medical and adult-use cannabis industry. Competition between companies in the cannabis industry also relies heavily on the ability to attract community support.

 

Because of the early stage of the industry in which the Subsidiaries operate, the Company expects the Subsidiaries to face additional competition from new entrants. To become and remain competitive, the Subsidiaries will require research and development, marketing, sales and support. The Company may not have sufficient resources to maintain research and development, marketing, sales and support efforts on a competitive basis which could materially and adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Subsidiaries and, in turn, the Company.

 

In addition, medical cannabis products compete against other healthcare drugs and a high volume of cannabis continues to be sold illegally on the illicit market.

 

Dependence on Performance of Subsidiaries

 

The Company is dependent on the operations, assets and financial health of the Subsidiaries. Accordingly, if the financial performance of any Subsidiary declines this will adversely affect the Company’s investment in such Subsidiary, the ability to realize a return on such investment and the financial results of the Company. The Company will conduct due diligence on each new entity prior to making any investment. Nonetheless, there is a risk that there may be some liabilities or other matters that are not identified through the due diligence or ongoing monitoring that may have an adverse effect on the business, and this could have a material adverse impact on the business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of the Company.

 

Competition from Synthetic Production and Technological Advances

 

The pharmaceutical industry may attempt to dominate the cannabis industry, and in particular, legal cannabis, through the development and distribution of synthetic products which emulate the effects and treatment of organic cannabis. If they are successful, the widespread popularity of such synthetic products could change the demand, volume and profitability of the cannabis industry. This could materially adversely affect the ability of the Company to secure long-term profitability and success through the sustainable and profitable operation of its business. There may be unknown additional regulatory fees and taxes that may be assessed in the future.

 

Ability to Identify Investments

 

A key element of the Company’s growth strategy will in part involve identifying and making acquisitions of interests in, or the businesses of, entities involved in the legal cannabis industry. The Company’s ability to identify such potential acquisition opportunities and make debt and/or equity investments is not guaranteed. Achieving the benefits of future acquisitions will depend in part on successfully identifying and capturing such opportunities in a timely and efficient manner and in structuring such arrangements to ensure a stable and growing stream of revenues.

 

21

 

 

Risks Associated with Failure to Manage Growth Effectively

 

The growth of High Street and the Company has placed and may continue to place significant demands on management and their operational and financial infrastructures. As the operations of the Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries grow in size, scope and complexity and as new opportunities are identified and pursued, the Company and High Street may need to increase in scale its infrastructure (financial, management, informational, personnel and otherwise). In addition, the Company will need to effectively execute on business opportunities and continue to build on and deploy its corporate development and marketing assets as well as access sufficient new capital, as may be required. The ability of the Company and High Street to successfully complete the proposed acquisitions and to capitalize on other growth opportunities may redirect the limited resources of the Company and/or High Street and require expansion of its infrastructure. This will require the commitment of financial, operational and technical resources in advance of an increase in the volume of business, with no assurance that the volume of business will increase.

 

There can be no assurance that the Company or High Street will be able to respond adequately or quickly enough to the changing demands that its proposed acquisition plans will impose on management, team members and existing infrastructure, and changes to the operating structure of the Company and High Street may result in increased costs or inefficiencies that cannot be anticipated. Changes as the Company and High Street grow may have a negative impact on their operations, and cost increases resulting from the inability to effectively manage its growth could adversely impact its profitability. In addition, continued growth could also strain the ability to maintain reliable service levels for its clients, develop and approve its operational, financial and management controls, enhance its reporting systems and procedures and recruit, train and retain highly-skilled personnel. Failure to effectively manage growth could result in difficulty or delays in servicing clients, declines in quality or client satisfaction, increases in costs, difficulties in introducing new products or applications or other operational difficulties, and any of these difficulties could adversely impact the business performance and results of operations of the Company and High Street.

 

Future Material Acquisitions or Dispositions of Strategic Transactions

 

Material acquisitions, dispositions and other strategic transactions involve a number of risks, including: (i) potential disruption of the Company’s ongoing business, (ii) distraction of management, (iii) the Company may become more financially leveraged, (iv) the anticipated benefits and cost savings of those transactions may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected, (v) increasing the scope and complexity of the Company’s operations, and (vi) loss or reduction of control over certain of the Company’s assets. Additionally, the Company or High Street may issue additional equity interests in connection with such transactions, which would dilute a shareholder’s holdings in the Company.

 

Proposed Transactions

 

The Company’s pending transactions are subject to certain conditions, many of which are outside of the control of the Company and there can be no assurance that they will be completed, on a timely basis or at all. As a consequence, there is a risk that one or more of the proposed transactions will not close in a timely fashion or at all. If one or more of the proposed transactions is not completed for any reason, the ongoing business of the Company may be adversely affected and, without realizing any of the benefits of having completed such transactions, the Company will be subject to a number of risks, including, without limitation, (i) the Company may experience negative reactions from the financial markets, including negative impacts on the Company’s stock price, (ii) in the case of a proposed acquisition, the Company may need to find an alternative use for any capital earmarked for such proposed acquisitions, (iii) in the case of a proposed disposition, the Company will not receive the anticipated proceeds of such disposition and accordingly may not be able to execute on other business opportunities for which such proceeds have been earmarked, and (iv) matters relating to the proposed transactions will require substantial commitments of time and resources by management of the Company which would otherwise have been devoted to day-to-day operations and other opportunities that may have been beneficial to the Company.

 

If one or more of the proposed transactions are not completed, the risks described above may materialize and they may adversely affect the business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects and stock price of the Company.

 

Acreage may be restricted from making Non-Core Divestitures within the prescribed time limit

 

The Debenture requires that we divest from our assets outside of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Illinois and Ohio (the “Identified States”) within 18 months of the date the Debenture is executed.

 

Canopy Growth has provided its consents to the Company with respect to the proposed divestiture by us of all assets outside of the Identified States (the “Non-Core Divestitures). The Debenture will provide that, among other things, if the Non-Core Divestitures are not completed within 18 months from the Amendment Date, whether as a result of regulatory delays or otherwise, such failure shall constitute an event of default thereunder. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the Debenture, the Loan will become immediately due and payable.

 

The Company may not have adequate resources to repay the Debenture. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to raise the necessary amount of capital to repay the Debenture or otherwise refinance these obligations. Accordingly, failure to complete the Non-Core Divestitures within the prescribed time would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects and could threaten its ability to satisfy its obligations or continue as a going concern.

 

In addition, if the Loan is required to be repaid prior to the maturity date, it would have an immediate and lasting material adverse effect on Acreage and its ability to complete the Acquisition. If the Amended Arrangement is not completed, Acreage will be subject to the restrictive covenants and consent requirements under the Existing Arrangement.

 

Ability to Access Public and Private Capital

 

The Company may require equity and/or debt financing to undertake capital expenditures or to undertake acquisitions or other transactions. If the Company is required to access capital markets to carry out its development objectives, the state of capital markets and other financial systems could affect the Company’s access to, and cost of, capital. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to the Company when needed or on terms that are commercially viable. The Company’s inability to raise financing to fund capital expenditures or acquisitions could limit its growth and may have a material adverse effect upon future profitability.

 

22

 

 

The Company may have access to equity financing from the public capital markets in Canada and the U.S. by virtue of its status as a reporting issuer in each of the provinces of Canada (other than Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island and Quebec), and under the Exchange Act. The Company also may have access to equity and debt financing from the prospectus exempt (private placement) markets in Canada and the U.S. The Company also has relationships with sources of private capital (such as funds and high net worth individuals) that could be investigated at a higher cost of capital. While the Company is not able to obtain bank financing in the U.S. or financing from other U.S. federally regulated entities, it currently has access to equity financing through the public and private markets in Canada and the U.S., and to debt financing in the U.S. through certain specialty lenders. Furthermore, the Amending Agreement provides that the Company may not issue any equity securities, without Canopy Growth’s prior consent, other than: (i) upon the exercise or conversion of convertible securities outstanding as of the Amendment Date; (ii) contractual commitments existing as of the Amendment Date; (iii) the Option Shares; (iv) the issuance of up to $3,000,000 worth of Fixed Shares pursuant to an at-the-market offering to be completed no more than four times during any one-year period; (v) the issuance of up to 500,000 Fixed Shares in connection with debt financing transactions that are otherwise in compliance with the terms of the Arrangement Agreement, as amended by the Amending Agreement; or (vi) pursuant to one private placement or public offering of securities during any one-year period for aggregate gross proceeds of up to $20,000,000, subject to specific limitations as set out in the Amending Agreement.

 

However, additional equity financing may be dilutive to shareholders of the Company and could involve the sale of securities with rights and preferences superior to those of the Fixed Shares or the Floating Shares. Debt financing may involve restrictions on the Company’s financing and operating activities. Debt financing may be convertible into other securities of the Company or involve the issuance of equity fees, either of which may result in immediate or resulting dilution. In either case, additional financing may not be available to the Company on acceptable terms or at all. If the Company is unable to raise additional funds as needed, the scope of its operations or growth may be reduced and, as a result, the Company may be unable to fulfill its long-term goals. In this case, investors may lose all or part of their investment. Any default under such debt instruments could have a material adverse effect on the Company, its business or the results of operations.

 

Investments May be Pre-Revenue

 

The Company may make investments in companies with no significant sources of operating cash flow and no revenue from operations. The Company’s investment in such companies are subject to risks and uncertainties that new companies with no operating history may face. In particular, there is a risk that the Company’s investment in these pre-revenue companies will not be able to meet anticipated revenue targets or generate no revenue at all. The risk is that underperforming pre-revenue companies may lead to these businesses failing which could have a materially adverse impact on the business, financial condition and operating results of the Company.

 

Enforceability of Judgments Against Subsidiaries

 

High Street and the Subsidiaries are organized under the laws of various U.S. states. All of the assets of these entities are located outside of Canada and certain of the experts retained by the Company or its affiliates are residents of countries other than Canada. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for shareholders of the Company to effect service within Canada upon such persons, or to realize against them in Canada upon judgments of courts of Canada predicated upon the civil liability provisions of applicable Canadian provincial securities laws or otherwise. There is some doubt as to the enforceability in the U.S. by a court in original actions, or in actions to enforce judgments of Canadian courts, of civil liabilities predicated upon such applicable Canadian provincial securities laws or otherwise. A court in the U.S. may refuse to hear a claim based on a violation of Canadian provincial securities laws or otherwise on the grounds that such jurisdiction is not the most appropriate forum to bring such a claim. Even if a court in the U.S. agrees to hear a claim, it may determine that the local law in the U.S., and not Canadian law, is applicable to the claim. If Canadian law is found to be applicable, the content of applicable Canadian law must be proven as a fact, which can be a time-consuming and costly process. Certain matters of procedure will also be governed by U.S. law in such circumstances.

 

Research and Market Development

 

Although the Company through High Street and the Subsidiaries, will be committed to researching and developing new markets and products and improving existing products, there can be no assurances that such research and market development activities will prove profitable or that the resulting markets and/or products, if any, will be commercially viable or successfully produced and marketed.

 

Due to the early stage of the legal cannabis industry, forecasts regarding the size of the industry and the sales of products by the Subsidiaries is inherently subject to significant unreliability. A failure in the demand for products to materialize as a result of competition, technological change or other factors could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition of High Street and the Subsidiaries, and consequently, the Company.

 

Results of Future Clinical Research

 

Research in Canada, the U.S. and internationally regarding the medical benefits, viability, safety, efficacy, dosing and social acceptance of cannabis or isolated cannabinoids (such as CBD and THC), and associated terpenoids remains in early stages. There have been relatively few clinical trials on the benefits of cannabis or isolated cannabinoids (such as CBD and THC). Although the Company believes that the articles, reports and studies support its beliefs regarding the medical benefits, viability, safety, risks, efficacy, dosing and social acceptance of cannabis, future basic research and clinical trials may prove such statements to be incorrect, or could raise concerns regarding, and perceptions relating to, cannabis. Future research studies and clinical trials may reach negative conclusions regarding the medical benefits, viability, safety, efficacy, dosing, social acceptance or other facts and perceptions related to cannabis, which could have a material adverse effect on the demand for the Company’s products with the potential to lead to a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

 

23

 

 

Environmental Risk and Regulation

 

The operations of the Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries are subject to environmental regulation in the various jurisdictions in which they operate. These regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards and land reclamation. They also set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors (or the equivalent thereof) and employees. There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulation, if any, will not adversely affect the operations of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries.

 

Governmental Approvals and Permits and Laws

 

Government approvals and permits are currently, and may in the future be, required in connection with the operations of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries. To the extent such approvals are required and not obtained, the Company, High Street or any of the Subsidiaries may be curtailed or prohibited from their production of medical and adult-use cannabis or from proceeding with the development of their operations as currently proposed.

 

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. The Subsidiaries may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of their operations and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

 

The Subsidiaries may not be able to obtain or maintain the necessary licenses, permits, certificates, authorizations or accreditations to operate their respective businesses, or may only be able to do so at great cost. In addition, the Subsidiaries may not be able to comply fully with the wide variety of laws and regulations applicable to the cannabis industry. Failure to comply with or to obtain the necessary licenses, permits, certificates, authorizations or accreditations could result in restrictions on a Subsidiary’s ability to operate in the cannabis industry, which could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition of the Company, High Street and/or the Subsidiaries.

 

Amendments to current laws, regulations and permits governing the production of medical and adult-use cannabis, or more stringent implementation thereof, could have a material adverse impact on the Company, High Street or any of the Subsidiaries and cause increases in expenses, capital expenditures or production costs or reduction in levels of production or require abandonment or delays in development.

 

Enforceability of Contracts

 

Since cannabis remains illegal at the federal level, courts in multiple U.S. states have on several occasions found cannabis-related contracts unenforceable due to illegality under federal law, even in the absence of any violation of state law. Therefore, there is uncertainty that the Company, High Street or any of the Subsidiaries will be able to legally enforce their respective material agreements.

 

Liability and Enforcement Complaints

 

The participation of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries in the cannabis industry may lead to litigation, formal or informal complaints, enforcement actions, and inquiries by various federal, state, or local governmental authorities against the Company, High Street or any of the Subsidiaries. Litigation, complaints, and enforcement actions could consume considerable amounts of financial and other corporate resources, which could have an adverse effect on the future cash flows, earnings, results of operations and financial condition of the Company, High Street or any of the Subsidiaries.

 

Service Providers

 

As a result of any adverse change to the approach in enforcement of the U.S. cannabis laws, adverse regulatory or political changes, additional scrutiny by regulatory authorities, adverse changes in the public perception in respect to the consumption of cannabis or otherwise, third-party service providers to the Company, High Street or any of the Subsidiaries could suspend or withdraw their services, which may have a material adverse effect on the business, revenues, operating results, financial condition or prospects of the Company, High Street or any of the Subsidiaries.

 

Reliance on Management or Consulting Services Agreements with Subsidiaries and Affiliates

 

The Subsidiaries and other affiliates provide assistance and advice in the medicinal cannabis business in certain cases through management or consulting services agreements entered into with state-licensed entities. Under such agreements, the Subsidiaries and affiliates perform certain operational or administrative services. In exchange for providing these services, the Subsidiaries and affiliates receive management fees which are a source of revenue. Payment of such fees is dependent on the continuing validity and enforceability of the relevant agreements. If such agreements are found to be invalid or unenforceable, or are terminated by the counter-party, this could have a material adverse effect on the business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.

 

24

 

 

Product Liability

 

Certain of the Subsidiaries manufacture, process and/or distribute products designed to be ingested by humans, and therefore face an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims, regulatory action and litigation if products are alleged to have caused significant loss or injury. In addition, the manufacture and sale of cannabis products involve the risk of injury to consumers due to tampering by unauthorized third parties or product contamination. Previously unknown adverse reactions resulting from human consumption of cannabis products alone or in combination with other medications or substances could occur. The Company, High Street and/or the Subsidiaries may be subject to various product liability claims, including, among others, that the products produced by them caused injury or illness, include inadequate instructions for use or include inadequate warnings concerning possible side effects or interactions with other substances. A product liability claim or regulatory action could result in increased costs, could adversely affect the reputation of the Company, High Street or any of the Subsidiaries, and could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition of the Company, High Street or any of the Subsidiaries. There can be no assurances that product liability insurance will be obtained or maintained on acceptable terms or with adequate coverage against potential liabilities.

 

Product Recalls

 

Cultivators, manufacturers and distributors of products are sometimes subject to the recall or return of their products for a variety of reasons, including product defects, such as contamination, unintended harmful side effects or interactions with other substances, packaging safety and inadequate or inaccurate labeling disclosure. If any of the products produced by the Subsidiaries are recalled due to an alleged product defect or for any other reason, the Subsidiaries could be required to incur the unexpected expense of the recall and any legal proceedings that might arise in connection with the recall and may lose a significant amount of sales and may not be able to replace those sales at an acceptable margin or at all. Additionally, if one of the products produced by a Subsidiary were subject to recall, the image of that product and the Subsidiary and potentially the Company could be harmed. A recall for any of the foregoing reasons could lead to decreased demand for products produced by the Subsidiaries and could have a material adverse effect on their results of operations and financial condition as well as those of the Company.

 

Risks Inherent in an Agricultural Business

 

Medical and adult-use cannabis is an agricultural product. There are risks inherent in the cultivation business, such as insects, plant diseases and similar agricultural risks. Although the products are usually grown indoors or in green houses under climate-controlled conditions, with conditions monitored, there can be no assurance that natural elements will not have a material adverse effect on the production of the Subsidiaries’ products and, consequentially, on the business, financial condition and operating results of the Company.

 

Reliance on Key Inputs

 

The cultivation, extraction and processing of cannabis and derivative products is dependent on a number of key inputs and their related costs including raw materials, electricity, water and other local utilities. Any significant interruption or negative change in the availability or economics of the supply chain for key inputs could materially impact the business, financial condition and operating results of the Subsidiaries, and consequently, the Company. Some of these inputs may only be available from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. If a sole source supplier was to go out of business, the relevant Subsidiary might be unable to find a replacement for such source in a timely manner or at all. Any inability to secure required supplies and services or to do so on appropriate terms could have a materially adverse impact on the business, financial condition and operating results of a Subsidiary, and consequently, the Company.

 

In addition, medical cannabis growing operations consume considerable energy, making the Subsidiaries vulnerable to rising energy costs. Rising or volatile energy costs may adversely impact the business of the Subsidiaries and their ability to operate profitably which may, in turn, adversely impact the Company.

 

Key Personnel

 

The success of the Company will depend on the abilities, experience, efforts and industry knowledge of senior management and other key employees of the Company and High Street. If one or more of the executive officers or key personnel of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries were unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, the Company, High Street or the relevant Subsidiary, as applicable, might not be able to replace them easily or at all. The long-term loss of the services of any key personnel for any reason could have a material adverse effect on business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of the Company. In addition, if any of the executive officers or key employees of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries joins a competitor or forms a competing company, the Company, High Street or the relevant Subsidiary may lose know-how, key professionals and staff members. Further, the hiring of any officer and the nomination of any director to the board of directors of the Company is subject to such proposed officer or director satisfying the criteria agreed to with Canopy Growth in the Amendment Agreement or otherwise obtaining prior written consent from Canopy Growth.

 

25

 

 

Talent Pool

 

As the Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries grow, they will need to hire additional human resources to continue to develop their businesses. However, experienced talent in the areas of medical cannabis research and development, growing cannabis and extraction is difficult to source, and there can be no assurance that the appropriate individuals will be available or affordable. Without adequate personnel and expertise, the growth of the business of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries may suffer. There can be no assurance that any of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries will be able to effectively manage growth, and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries.

 

Fraudulent or Illegal Activity by Employees, Contractors and Consultants

 

The Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries are exposed to the risk that any of their employees, independent contractors, consultants or business counterparties may engage in fraudulent or other illegal activity. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless and/or negligent conduct or disclosure of unauthorized activities to the Company, High Street or any Subsidiary that violates, (i) government regulations, (ii) manufacturing standards, (iii) federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations, or (iv) laws that require the true, complete and accurate reporting of financial information or data. It may not always be possible for the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries to identify and deter misconduct by its employees and other third parties, and the precautions taken by the Company to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against the Company, High Street or any of the Subsidiaries, and it is not successful in defending itself or asserting its rights, those actions could have a significant impact on the business of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries, including the imposition of civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, monetary fines, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, and curtailment of the operations of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of the Company, High Street or any of the Subsidiaries.

 

Intellectual Property

 

The success of the Company will depend, in part, on the ability of the Subsidiaries to maintain and enhance trade secret protection over their existing and potential proprietary techniques and processes. The Subsidiaries may be vulnerable to competitors who develop competing technology, whether independently or as a result of acquiring access to the proprietary products and trade secrets of the Subsidiaries, notwithstanding the Subsidiaries’ use and enforcement of non-disclosure and non-compete agreements. In addition, effective future patent, copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in certain foreign countries and may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions. Failure of the Subsidiaries to adequately maintain and enhance protection over their proprietary techniques and processes could have a materially adverse impact on the business, financial condition and operating results of the Company.

 

The Company May be Exposed to Infringement or Misappropriation Claims by Third Parties

 

The Company’s success may likely depend on the ability of the Subsidiaries to use and develop new extraction technologies, recipes, know-how and new strains of cannabis without infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties. The Company cannot ensure that third parties will not assert intellectual property claims against it. The Company is subject to additional risks if entities licensing intellectual property to the Company do not have adequate rights in any such licensed materials. If third parties assert copyright or patent infringement or violation of other intellectual property rights against the Company, it will be required to defend itself in litigation or administrative proceedings, which can be both costly and time consuming and may significantly divert the efforts and resources of management personnel. An adverse determination in any such litigation or proceedings to which the Company may become a party could subject it to significant liability to third parties, require it to seek licenses from third parties, to pay ongoing royalties or subject the Company to injunctions prohibiting the development and operation of its products and services.

 

Insurance Coverage

 

There is a risk that a greater number of state regulatory agencies will begin requiring entities engaged in certain aspects of the business or industry of legal cannabis to post a bond or significant fees when applying for example for a dispensary license or renewal as a guarantee of payment of sales and franchise tax. The Company is not able to quantify at this time the potential scope for such bonds or fees in the states in which it currently or may in the future have operations. Any bonds or fees of material amounts could have a negative impact on the ultimate success of the business of the Subsidiaries and High Street, and consequently, the Company.

 

The Company’s business is subject to numerous risks and hazards generally, including adverse environmental conditions, accidents, labor disputes and changes in the regulatory environment. Such occurrences could result in damage to assets, personal injury or death, environmental damage, delays in operations, monetary losses and possible legal liability.

 

26

 

 

Although High Street maintains insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as it considers to be reasonable, its insurance does not cover all the potential risks associated with its operations. The Company may also be unable to maintain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums. Insurance coverage may not continue to be available or may not be adequate to cover any resulting liability. Moreover, insurance against risks such as environmental pollution or other hazards encountered in the operations of High Street and the Subsidiaries is not generally available on acceptable terms. The Company might also become subject to liability for pollution or other hazards which may not be insured against or which the Company may elect not to insure against because of premium costs or other reasons. Losses from these events may cause the Company to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect upon its business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects.

 

Litigation

 

Any of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries may become party to litigation from time to time in the ordinary course of business which could adversely affect their businesses. Should any litigation in which any of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries becomes involved result in a decision or verdict against them, such decision or verdict could materially adversely affect the ability of the Company, High Street or any Subsidiary to continue operating and could materially adversely impact the market price for Fixed Shares and Floating Shares as well as result in the expenditure of significant resources. Even if any of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries are involved in litigation and wins, litigation can redirect significant resources from business operations to prosecuting or defending such litigation, which can adversely affect the business, operations or financial condition of the Company, High Street and/or the Subsidiaries, as applicable.

 

Internal Controls

 

Effective internal controls are necessary for the Company to provide reliable financial reports and to help prevent fraud. Although the Company will implement a number of safeguards in efforts to ensure the reliability of its financial reports, including those imposed on the Company under U.S. and Canadian laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company cannot be certain that such measures will ensure that the Company will maintain adequate control over financial reporting. Failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm the Company’s ability to meet its reporting obligations. If the Company or its auditors discover a material weakness, the disclosure of that fact, even if quickly remedied, could reduce the market’s confidence in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and adversely affect the trading price of the Fixed Shares and Floating Shares.

 

We are exposed to potential risks from legislation requiring companies to evaluate internal controls under Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. As an emerging growth company, we will be exempt from auditor attestation requirements concerning any such report so long as we are an emerging growth company. Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 

Operational Risks

 

The Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries may be affected by a number of operational risks and may not be adequately insured for certain risks, including: labor disputes; catastrophic accidents; fires; blockades or other acts of social activism; changes in the regulatory environment; impact of non-compliance with laws and regulations; natural phenomena, such as inclement weather conditions, floods, earthquakes and ground movements. There is no assurance that the foregoing risks and hazards will not result in damage to, or destruction of, the Subsidiaries’ properties, dispensary facilities, grow facilities and extraction facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage, or have an adverse impact on the Subsidiaries’ operations, costs, monetary losses, potential legal liability and adverse governmental action, any of which could have an adverse impact on the future cash flows, earnings and financial condition of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries. Also, the Subsidiaries may be subject to or affected by liability or sustain loss for certain risks and hazards against which they may elect not to insure because of the cost. This lack of insurance coverage could have an adverse impact on future cash flows, earnings, results of operations and financial condition of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries.

 

Conflicts of Interest

 

Certain of the Company’s directors and officers are, and may continue to be, involved in other business ventures through their direct and indirect participation in corporations, partnerships, joint ventures, etc. that may become potential competitors of the products and services the Company intends to provide. Situations may arise in connection with potential acquisitions or investment opportunities where the other interests of these directors and officers conflict with or diverge from the Company’s interests. In accordance with applicable corporate law, directors who have a material interest in or who are a party to a material contract or a proposed material contract with the Company are required, subject to certain exceptions, to disclose that interest and generally abstain from voting on any resolution to approve the contract. In addition, the directors and officers are required to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company. However, in conflict of interest situations, the Company’s directors and officers may owe the same duty to another company and will need to balance their competing interests with their duties to the Company. Circumstances (including with respect to future corporate opportunities) may arise that may be resolved in a manner that is unfavorable to the Company.

 

27

 

 

Effect of General Economic and Political Conditions

 

The business of each of the Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries, is subject to the impact of changes in national or North American economic conditions including, but not limited to, recessionary or inflationary trends, equity market conditions, consumer credit availability, interest rates, consumers’ disposable income and spending levels, job security and unemployment, and overall consumer confidence. These economic conditions may be further affected by political events throughout the world that cause disruptions in the financial markets, either directly or indirectly. Adverse economic and political developments could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of the Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries.

 

Information Technology Systems and Cyber Security Risk

 

The Subsidiaries’ use of technology is critical in their respective continued operations. The Subsidiaries are susceptible to operational, financial and information security risks resulting from cyber-attacks and/or technological malfunctions. Successful cyber-attacks and/or technological malfunctions affecting the Subsidiaries or their service providers can result in, among other things, financial losses, the inability to process transactions, the unauthorized release of customer information or confidential information and reputational risk.

 

The Subsidiaries have not experienced any material losses to date relating to cybersecurity attacks or other information breaches. However, there can be no assurance that the Subsidiaries will not incur such losses in the future. As cybersecurity threats continue to evolve, the Subsidiaries may be required to use additional resources to continue to modify or enhance protective measures or to investigate security vulnerabilities.

 

Security Risks

 

The business premises of the Company’s operating locations may be targets for theft. While the Subsidiaries have implemented security measures at each location and continue to monitor and improve their security measures, their cultivation, processing and dispensary facilities could be subject to break-ins, robberies and other breaches in security. If there was a breach in security and a Subsidiary fell victim to a robbery or theft, the loss of cannabis plants, cannabis oils, cannabis flowers and cultivation and processing equipment could have a material adverse impact on the business, financial condition and results of operation of such Subsidiary and, consequentially, the Company and High Street.

 

As the Subsidiaries’ businesses involve the movement and transfer of cash which is collected from dispensaries or patients/customers and deposited into its bank, there is a risk of theft or robbery during the transport of cash. The Subsidiaries have engaged security firms to provide security in the transport and movement of large amounts of cash. While the Subsidiaries have taken robust steps to prevent theft or robbery of cash during transport, there can be no assurance that there will not be a security breach during the transport and the movement of cash involving the theft of product or cash.

 

Past Performance Not Indicative of Future Results

 

The investment and operational performance of High Street prior to the completion of the RTO is not indicative of the future operating results of the Company. There can be no assurance that the historical operating results achieved by High Street or its affiliates will be achieved by the Company, and the Company’s performance may be materially different.

 

Going Concern Risk

 

The Company will continually monitor its capital requirements based on its capital and operational needs and the economic environment and may raise new capital as necessary. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern will depend on its ability to realize profits from High Street and or the ability to raise additional equity or debt in the private or public markets. While the Company and High Street have been successful in raising equity and debt to date, there can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in completing an equity or debt financing or in achieving profitability in the future.

 

As reflected in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 (the “Consolidated Financial Statements”), the Company had an accumulated deficit and a negative net working capital (current liabilities greater than current assets) as of December 31, 2020, as well as a net loss and negative cash flow from operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

However, management believes that substantial doubt of our ability to meet our obligations for the next twelve months from the date of the financial statements included herein were first made available has been alleviated due to, but not limited to, (i) access to future capital commitments (see Note 17 of the Consolidated Financial Statements), (ii) continued sales growth from our consolidated operations, (iii) latitude as to the timing and amount of certain operating expenses as well as capital expenditures, (iv) restructuring plans that have already been put in place to improve the Company’s profitability.

 

28

 

 

If the Company is unable to raise additional capital whenever necessary, it may be forced to decelerate or curtail its footprint buildout or other operational activities until such time as additional capital becomes available. Such limitation of the Company’s activities would allow it to slow its rate of spending and extend its use of cash until additional capital is raised. However, management cannot provide any assurances that we will be successful in accomplishing any of our plans. Management also cannot provide any assurance as to unforeseen circumstances that could occur at any time within the next twelve months or thereafter which could increase our need to raise additional capital on an immediate basis. There are limits on the number of shares we can issue provided for in the Arrangement Agreement. See “Amended Arrangement with Canopy Growth Corporation”.

 

Indemnification

 

The Company’s Articles provide that the Company will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify directors and officers for certain liabilities incurred by them by virtue of having been a director or officer of the Company.

 

The Company may also have contractual indemnification obligations under any future employment agreements with its officers or agreements entered into with its directors. The foregoing indemnification obligations could result in it incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage awards against directors and officers, which the Company may be unable to recoup. These provisions and the resulting costs may also discourage it from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties, and may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by its shareholders against its directors and officers even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit it and its shareholder.

 

Difficulty in Enforcing Judgments and Effecting Service of Process on Directors and Officers

 

Certain directors and officers of the Company reside outside of Canada and some or all of the assets of such persons are located outside of Canada. Therefore, it may not be possible for shareholders to collect or to enforce judgments obtained in Canadian courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of applicable Canadian securities laws against such persons. Moreover, it may not be possible for shareholders to effect service of process within Canada upon such persons.

 

Risks Related to Ownership

 

Voting Control

 

As a result of the Class F Multiple Voting Shares (the “Fixed Multiple Shares”) held by Mr. Murphy, he exercises a significant majority of the voting power in respect of our shares. The Fixed Shares and the Floating Shares are each entitled to one vote per share and the Fixed Multiple Shares are entitled to 4,300 votes per share. As a result, Mr. Murphy has the ability to control the outcome of all matters submitted to the Company’s shareholders for approval, including the election and removal of directors and any arrangement or sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company. This concentrated control could delay, defer, or prevent a change of control of the Company, an arrangement or amalgamation involving the Company or sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company that its other shareholders support. Conversely, this concentrated control could allow Mr. Murphy, as the holder of the Fixed Multiple Shares, to cause the Company to consummate such a transaction that the Company’s other shareholders do not support. In addition, the holder of the Fixed Multiple Shares may cause the Company to make long-term strategic investment decisions and take risks that may not be successful and may seriously harm the Company’s business.

 

As a member of the Board, Mr. Murphy owes fiduciary duties to the Company, including those of care and loyalty, and must act in good faith and with a view to the best interests of the Company. As a shareholder, even a controlling shareholder, Mr. Murphy will be entitled to vote his shares, and shares over which he has voting control, in his own interests, which may not always be in the interests of the Company’s shareholders generally. Because Mr. Murphy holds most of his economic interest in the Company’s business through High Street, rather than through the Company, he may have conflicting interests with holders of our shares. For example, Mr. Murphy may have different tax positions from the Company, which could influence his decisions regarding whether and when the Company should dispose of assets or incur new or refinance existing indebtedness, especially in light of the existence of the Tax Receivable Agreement, and whether and when the Company should undergo certain changes of control within the meaning of the Tax Receivable Agreement or terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement. In addition, the structuring of future transactions may take into consideration these tax or other considerations even where no similar benefit would accrue to the Company. In addition, the significant ownership of Mr. Murphy in the Company and his resulting ability to effectively control the Company may discourage someone from making a significant equity investment in the Company, or could discourage transactions involving a change in control, including transactions in which holders of our shares might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over the then-current market price.

 

Unpredictability Caused by Voting Control

 

Although other companies have dual class or multiple voting share structures, given the unique capital structure of the Company and the concentration of voting control held by the Mr. Murphy, as the sole holder of the Fixed Multiple Shares, this structure and control could result in a lower trading price for, or greater fluctuations in the trading price of, the Fixed Shares and the Floating Shares, or may result in adverse publicity to the Company or other adverse consequences.

 

29

 

 

Price Volatility of Publicly Traded Securities

 

In recent years, the securities markets in the U.S. and Canada have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market prices of securities of many companies have experienced wide fluctuations in price which have not necessarily been related to the operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. There can be no assurance that fluctuations in price of the Fixed Shares and the Floating Shares will not occur. The market price of the Fixed Shares and the Floating Shares could be subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in quarterly and annual operating results, the results of any public announcements the Company makes, general economic conditions, and other factors. Increased levels of volatility and resulting market turmoil may adversely impact the price of the Fixed Shares and the Floating Shares.

 

Price Volatility Caused by COVID-19

 

The COVID-19 outbreak, and the response of governmental authorities to try to limit it, are having a significant impact on the securities markets in the U.S. and Canada. Since the COVID-19 outbreak commenced, the securities markets in the U.S. and Canada have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility and wide fluctuations in the market prices of securities of many companies, which have not necessarily been related to the operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. The speed with which the COVID-19 situation has developed and continues to develop and the uncertainty of its magnitude, outcome and duration may adversely impact the price of the Fixed Shares or the Floating Shares. See “Our Results of Operations May be Negatively Impacted by the COVID-19 Outbreak” and “Price Volatility of Publicly Traded Securities”.

 

Dividends

 

Holders of our shares will not have a right to dividends on such shares unless declared by the Board. It is not anticipated that the Company will pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Dividends paid by the Company would be subject to tax and, potentially, withholdings. The declaration of dividends is at the discretion of the Board, even if the Company has sufficient funds, net of its liabilities, to pay such dividends, and the declaration of any dividend will depend on the Company’s financial results, cash requirements, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant by the Board. Furthermore, the Company cannot declare, set aside or pay any dividend in respect of our shares without the prior written consent of Canopy Growth. See “Amended Arrangement with Canopy Growth Corporation”.

 

Dilution

 

The Company and High Street may issue additional securities in the future, which may dilute a shareholder’s holdings in the Company and the Company’s revenue per share. The Board has discretion to determine the price and the terms of further issuances. Moreover, additional Fixed Shares and Floating Shares will be issued by the Company on the exercise of options under the Company’s Omnibus Incentive Plan, upon the exercise of the outstanding warrants and upon the redemption of outstanding Units. Moreover, additional Fixed Shares and Floating Shares will be issued by the Company on the exercise, conversion or redemption of certain outstanding securities of the Company, Acreage Holdings America, Inc. (“USCo”), Acreage Holdings WC, Inc. (“USCo2”) and High Street in accordance with their terms. The Company may also issue Fixed Shares and Floating Shares to finance future acquisitions. The Company cannot predict the size of future issuances of Fixed Shares and Floating Shares or the effect that future issuances and sales of Fixed Shares and Floating Shares will have on the market price of the Fixed Shares and the Floating Shares. Issuances of a substantial number of additional Fixed Shares and Floating Shares, or the perception that such issuances could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for the Fixed Shares and the Floating Shares.

 

Costs of Maintaining a Public Listing

 

As a public company, there are costs associated with legal, accounting and other expenses related to regulatory compliance. Securities legislation and the rules and policies of the CSE require listed companies to, among other things, adopt corporate governance and related practices, and to continuously prepare and disclose material information, all of which add to a company’s legal and financial compliance costs. The Company may also elect to devote greater resources than it otherwise would have on communication and other activities typically considered important by publicly traded companies.

 

Cash Flow From Operations

 

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company sustained net losses from operations and had negative cash flow from operating activities. As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s accumulated deficit was approximately $475.2 million. Additionally, as of December 31, 2020, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash was approximately $54.6 million. See “Sufficiency of Capital”.

 

30

 

 

Sufficiency of Capital

 

Should the Company’s costs and expenses prove to be greater than currently anticipated, or should the Company change its current business plan in a manner that will increase or accelerate its anticipated costs and expenses, the depletion of its working capital would be accelerated. To the extent it becomes necessary to raise additional cash in the future as its current cash and working capital resources are depleted, the Company will seek to raise it through the public or private sale of assets, debt or equity securities, the procurement of advances on contracts or licenses, funding from joint-venture or strategic partners, debt financing or short-term loans, or a combination of the foregoing. The Company may also seek to satisfy indebtedness without any cash outlay through the private issuance of debt or equity securities. The Company cannot guarantee that it will be able to secure the additional cash or working capital it may require to continue our operations. Failure by the Company to obtain additional cash or working capital on a timely basis and in sufficient amounts to fund its operations or to make other satisfactory arrangements may cause the Company to delay or indefinitely postpone certain of its activities, including potential acquisitions, or to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell material assets, seek additional capital (if available) or seek compromise arrangements with its creditors. The foregoing could materially and adversely impact the business, operations, financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

  

United States Tax Classification of the Company

 

Although the Company is and will continue to be a British Columbia company, the Company is also treated as a United States corporation for United States federal income tax purposes under section 7874 of the Code and is subject to United States federal income tax on its worldwide income. However, for Canadian tax purposes, the Company is, regardless of any application of section 7874 of the Code, to be treated as being resident of Canada under the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Tax Act”). As a result, the Company will be subject to taxation both in Canada and the United States which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

 

Any dividends received by shareholders who are residents of Canada for purposes of the Tax Act will generally be subject to U.S. withholding tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as provided in an applicable treaty. In addition, a Canadian foreign tax credit or deduction may not be available under the Tax Act in respect of such taxes.

 

Dividends received by U.S. resident shareholders will not be subject to U.S. withholding tax but will be subject to Canadian withholding tax under the Tax Act at a 25% rate or such lower rate as provided in an applicable treaty. Dividends paid by the Company will be characterized as U.S. source income for purposes of the foreign tax credit rules under the Code. Accordingly, U.S. shareholders generally will not be able to claim a credit for any Canadian tax withheld unless, depending on the circumstances, they have an excess foreign tax credit limitation due to other foreign source income that is subject to a low or zero rate of foreign tax.

 

Dividends received by shareholders that are neither Canadian nor U.S. residents will generally be subject to U.S. withholding tax and will also be subject to Canadian withholding tax. These dividends may not qualify for a reduced rate of U.S. withholding tax under any income tax treaty otherwise applicable to a shareholder of the Company, subject to examination of the relevant treaty.

 

The Company is treated as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes under section 7874 of the Code. As a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the taxation of the Company’s non-U.S. holders of Fixed Shares or the Floating Shares upon a disposition of Fixed Shares or the Floating Shares generally depends on whether the Company is classified as a United States real property holding corporation (a “USRPHC”) under the Code. The Company believes that it is not currently, and has never been, a USRPHC. However, the Company has not sought and does not intend to seek formal confirmation of its status as a non-USRPHC from the IRS. If the Company ultimately is determined by the IRS to constitute a USRPHC, its non-U.S. holders of the Fixed Shares and the Floating Shares may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain associated with the disposition of the Fixed Shares and the Floating Shares.

 

EACH SHAREHOLDER SHOULD SEEK TAX ADVICE, BASED ON SUCH SHAREHOLDER’S PARTICULAR FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES, FROM AN INDEPENDENT TAX ADVISOR, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, IN CONNECTION WITH THE COMPANY’S CLASSIFICATION AS A U.S. DOMESTIC CORPORATION FOR UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES UNDER SECTION 7874(b) OF THE CODE, THE APPLICATION OF THE CODE, THE APPLICATION OF A U.S. TAX TREATY, THE APPLICATION OF U.S. FEDERAL ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES, THE APPLICATION OF U.S. FEDERAL TAX WITHHOLDING REQUIREMENTS, THE APPLICATION OF U.S. ESTIMATED TAX PAYMENT REQUIREMENTS AND THE APPLICATION OF U.S. TAX RETURN FILING REQUIREMENTS.

 

Risks Related to the Company’s Organizational Structure

 

Corporate Structure Risks

 

The Company is a holding company and has no material assets other than its indirect ownership of Units of High Street. As such, the Company has no independent means of generating revenue or cash flow. The Company has determined that High Street will be a variable interest entity (a “VIE”) and that it will be the primary beneficiary of High Street. Accordingly, pursuant to the VIE accounting model, the Company will consolidate High Street in its consolidated financial statements. In the event of a change in accounting guidance or amendments to the Amended and Restated LLC Agreement which governs High Street (the “A&R LLC Agreement”) resulting in the Company no longer having a controlling interest in High Street, the Company may not be able to consolidate High Street’s results of operations with its own, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations. Moreover, the Company’s ability to pay its taxes and operating expenses or declare and pay dividends in the future, if any, will be dependent upon the financial results and cash flows of High Street and the Subsidiaries and distributions it receives indirectly from High Street. There can be no assurance that any of High Street or the Subsidiaries will generate sufficient cash flow to distribute funds to the Company or that applicable state law and contractual restrictions will permit such distributions.

 

31

 

 

High Street will continue to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, as such, will not be subject to any entity-level U.S. federal income tax. Instead, taxable income will be allocated to the holders of Units. Accordingly, holders of Units will incur income taxes on their allocable share of any net taxable income of High Street. Under the terms of the A&R LLC Agreement, High Street will be obligated to make tax distributions to holders of Units. USCo intends, as its manager, to cause High Street to make cash distributions to the owners of Units in an amount sufficient to (i) fund their tax obligations in respect of taxable income allocated to them, and (ii) cover the operating expenses of USCo, USCo2 and the Company, including payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement. However, High Street’s ability to make such distributions may be subject to various limitations and restrictions, such as restrictions on distributions that would either violate any contract or agreement to which High Street is then a party, including debt agreements, or any applicable law, or that would have the effect of rendering High Street insolvent. If the Company does not have sufficient funds to pay tax or other liabilities or to fund its operations, it may have to borrow funds, which could materially adversely affect its liquidity and financial condition and subject it to various restrictions imposed by any such lenders. In addition, if High Street does not have sufficient funds to make distributions, the Company’s ability to declare and pay cash dividends will also be restricted or impaired.

 

High Street Tax Receivable Agreement

 

USCo is a party to the tax receivable dated November 14, 2018 (the “Tax Receivable Agreement”) between USCo, High Street and certain executive employees of the Company (the “Tax Receivable Recipients”). Under the Tax Receivable Agreement, USCo is required to make cash payments to the Tax Receivable Recipients equal to 65% of the tax benefits, if any, that USCo actually realizes, or in certain circumstances is deemed to realize, as a result of (i) the increases in its share of the tax basis of assets of High Street resulting from any redemptions or exchanges of Units from the High Street Members, and (ii) certain other tax benefits related to USCo making payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement. Although the actual timing and amount of any payments that USCo makes to the Tax Receivable Recipients under the Tax Receivable Agreement will vary, it expects those payments will be significant. Any payments made by USCo to the Tax Receivable Recipients under the Tax Receivable Agreement may generally reduce the amount of overall cash flow that might have otherwise been available to it. Furthermore, USCo’s future obligation to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement could make the Company a less attractive target for an acquisition. Payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement are not conditioned on any Tax Receivable Recipient’s continued ownership of Units or our shares after the completion of the RTO.

 

The actual amount and timing of any payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of redemptions or exchanges by the holders of Units, the amount of gain recognized by such holders of Units, the realized tax benefit by USCo, the amount and timing of the taxable income USCo generates in the future, and the applicable federal and state tax rates.

 

The Company’s organizational structure, including the Tax Receivable Agreement, confers certain benefits upon the Tax Receivable Recipients that will not benefit the holders of our shares to the same extent as it will benefit the Tax Receivable Recipients. High Street is a party to the Tax Receivable Agreement, which provides for the payment by USCo to the Tax Receivable Recipients of 65% of the amount of tax benefits, if any, that High Street actually realizes, or in some circumstances is deemed to realize, as a result of (i) the increases in the tax basis of assets of High Street resulting from any redemptions or exchanges of Units from the High Street Members, and (ii) certain other tax benefits related to USCo making payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement. An additional 20% of such tax benefits will be paid to certain executives of High Street upon the Tax Receivable Bonus Plan. Although USCo will retain 15% of the amount of such tax benefits, this and other aspects of the Company’s organizational structure may adversely impact the Company’s financial results.

 

The Tax Receivable Agreement provides that upon certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control or if, at any time, USCo elects an early termination of the Tax Receivable Agreement, then its obligations, or its successor’s obligations, under the Tax Receivable Agreement to make payments thereunder would be based on certain assumptions, including an assumption that USCo would have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize all potential future tax benefits that are subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement.

 

As a result of the foregoing, (i) USCo could be required to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement that are greater than the specified percentage of the actual benefits it ultimately realizes in respect of the tax benefits that are subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement, and (ii) if it elects to terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement early, it would be required to make an immediate cash payment equal to the present value of the anticipated future tax benefits that are the subject of the Tax Receivable Agreement, which payment may be made significantly in advance of the actual realization, if any, of such future tax benefits. In these situations, USCo’s obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control of the Company. There can be no assurance that USCo will be able to fund or finance its obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement.

 

32

 

 

Payments Made Under the Tax Receivable Agreement

 

Payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be based on the tax reporting positions that USCo determines, and the IRS or another tax authority may challenge all or part of the tax basis increases, as well as other related tax positions USCo takes, and a court could sustain such challenge. If the outcome of any such challenge would reasonably be expected to materially affect a recipient’s payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, then USCo will not be permitted to settle or fail to contest such challenge without the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed) of each Tax Receivable Recipient that directly or indirectly owns at least 10% of the outstanding Units of High Street. USCo will not be reimbursed for any cash payments previously made under the Tax Receivable Agreement in the event that any tax benefits initially claimed by USCo and for which payment has been made are subsequently challenged by a taxing authority and are ultimately disallowed. Instead, any excess cash payments made by USCo to a Tax Receivable Recipient will be netted against any future cash payments that USCo might otherwise be required to make under the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement. However, USCo might not determine that USCo has effectively made an excess cash payment to a Tax Receivable Recipient for a number of years following the initial time of such payment and, if any of USCo tax reporting positions are challenged by a taxing authority, USCo will not be permitted to reduce any future cash payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement until any such challenge is finally settled or determined. As a result, payments could be made under the Tax Receivable Agreement in excess of the tax savings that USCo realizes in respect of the tax attributes with respect to a Tax Receivable Recipient that are the subject of the Tax Receivable Agreement.

 

Fluctuations in the Company’s tax obligations and effective tax rate and realization of the Company’s deferred tax assets may result in volatility of the Company’s operating results.

 

The Company will be subject to taxes by the Canadian federal, state, local and foreign tax authorities, and the Company’s tax liabilities will be affected by the allocation of expenses to differing jurisdictions. The Company records tax expenses based on estimates of future earnings, which may include reserves for uncertain tax positions in multiple tax jurisdictions, and valuation allowances related to certain net deferred tax assets. At any one time, many tax years may be subject to audit by various taxing jurisdictions. The results of these audits and negotiations with taxing authorities may affect the ultimate settlement of these matters. The Company expects that throughout the year there could be ongoing variability in the quarterly tax rates as events occur and exposures are evaluated. The Company’s future effective tax rates could be subject to volatility or adversely affected by a number of factors, including:

 

changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities;

expected timing and amount of the release of any tax valuation allowances;

tax effects of share-based compensation;

changes in tax laws, regulations or interpretations thereof; or

future earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where the Company has lower statutory tax rates and higher than anticipated earnings in countries where the Company has higher statutory tax rates.

 

In addition, the Company’s effective tax rate in a given financial statement period may be materially impacted by a variety of factors including but not limited to changes in the mix and level of earnings, varying tax rates in the different jurisdictions in which the Company, High Street and the Subsidiaries operate, fluctuations in valuation allowances, deductibility of certain items, or by changes to existing accounting rules or regulations. Further, tax legislation may be enacted in the future which could negatively impact the Company’s current or future tax structure and effective tax rates. The Company, High Street or any Subsidiary may be subject to audits of income, sales, and other transaction taxes by federal, state, local, and foreign taxing authorities. Outcomes from these audits could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results and financial condition of the Company, High Street or the Subsidiaries.

 

Under Sections 3(a)(1)(A) and (C) of the United States Investment Company Act 1940 (the “1940 Act”), a company generally will be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the 1940 Act if (i) it is, or holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities or (ii) it engages, or proposes to engage, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. The Company does not believe it is an “investment company,” as such term is defined in either of those sections of the 1940 Act.

 

The Company indirectly controls and operates High Street. On that basis, the Company believes that its interest in High Street is not an “investment security” as that term is used in the 1940 Act. However, if the Company were to cease participation in the management of High Street, its interest in High Street could be deemed an “investment security” for purposes of the 1940 Act.

 

The Company and High Street intend to conduct their operations so that the Company will not be deemed an investment company. However, if the Company were to be deemed an investment company, restrictions imposed by the 1940 Act, including limitations on the Company’s capital structure and the Company’s ability to transact with affiliates, could make it impractical for the Company to continue its business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.

 

33

 

 

Risks Related to the Acquisition

 

The Arrangement Agreement and the Amending Agreement each contain restrictive covenants which may adversely limit management’s discretion in operating our business.

 

The Arrangement Agreement and the Amending Agreement each contain restrictive covenants that may potentially impair the discretion of our management with respect to certain business matters. These covenants place restrictions on, among other things, the ability of us to make any material change to the nature of our business, to pay distributions or make certain other payments, to create liens or encumbrances, to issue securities, or to take on indebtedness not permitted by the Arrangement Agreement and to sell or otherwise dispose of certain assets. A failure to comply with these terms, if not cured or waived, could result in a breach of the Arrangement Agreement.

 

If we do not comply with the initial business plan set forth in the Proposal Agreement, there may be significant restrictions on the operation of our business and Canopy Growth may not be required to complete the Acquisition.

 

Pursuant to the Arrangement Agreement, we are required to comply with the initial business plan set forth in the Proposal Agreement (the “Initial Business Plan”). The Initial Business Plan sets forth certain Pro-Forma Net Revenue Targets (as defined in the Arrangement Agreement) and Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Targets (as defined in the Arrangement Agreement) for each applicable fiscal year of the Initial Business Plan.

 

If, at the end of a fiscal quarter (commencing with the fiscal quarter dated December 31, 2020), our Pro-Forma Revenue (as defined in the Arrangement Agreement) is less than 90% of the Pro-Forma Net Revenue Target set forth in the Initial Business Plan or if the Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Arrangement Agreement) is less than 90% of the Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Target set forth in the Initial Business Plan, an Interim Failure to Perform (as defined in the Arrangement Agreement) will be deemed to have occurred and the Austerity Measures (as defined in the Arrangement Agreement) will become applicable. The Austerity Measures place significant restrictions on our ability to take certain actions in the operation of our business. Among other things, the Austerity Measures prevent us from issuing any Fixed Shares, Fixed Multiple Shares or Floating Shares, granting any New Options (as defined in the Arrangement Agreement) or Floating Options (as defined in the Arrangement Agreement), entering into any contract in respect of Company Debt (as defined in the Arrangement Agreement) (other than in the ordinary course of business), or paying any fees owing to members of our Board. The Austerity Measures also prevent us and our subsidiaries from entering into any business combination, merger or acquisition of assets (other than in the ordinary course of business), from making any new capital investments or incurring any new capital expenditures, and from entering into any contract to dispose of any assets (other than in the ordinary course of business). The Austerity Measures will apply until the non-compliance causing the Interim Failure to Perform is cured by us and our subsidiaries, as applicable. However, if an Interim Failure to Perform occurs and the Austerity Measures are implemented, the ability of us to conduct our business in the ordinary course will be significantly restricted. Accordingly, the occurrence of an Interim Failure to Perform will increase the possibility that a Material Failure to Perform (as defined in the Arrangement Agreement) and/or a Failure to Perform (as defined in the Arrangement Agreement) will occur.

 

A Material Failure to Perform will be deemed to occur if our Pro-Forma Revenue is less than 80% of the Pro-Forma Net Revenue Target or the Consolidated EBITDA is less than 80% of the Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Target, as determined on an annual basis (commencing in respect of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021). The occurrence of a Material Failure to Perform is considered a breach of a material term of the Arrangement Agreement incapable of being cured. Consequently, certain restrictive covenants under the Arrangement Agreement which relate to exclusivity and non-competition of Canopy Growth in favor of us, including the restriction preventing Canopy Growth from acquiring a competitor of ours in the United States, will terminate. In addition, the occurrence of a Material Failure to Perform is likely to constitute an event of default under the Debenture, causing the Hempco Loan to become immediately due and payable. If the Hempco Loan is required to be repaid prior to the maturity date, it would have an immediate and lasting material adverse effect on us and our ability to complete the Acquisition.

 

In addition, if our Pro-Forma Revenue is less than 60% of the Pro-Forma Net Revenue Target or the Consolidated EBITDA is less than 60% of the Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Target for the trailing 12 month period ending on the date that is 30 days prior to the proposed Acquisition Time, a Failure to Perform shall occur and a material adverse impact will be deemed to have occurred for purposes of Section 6.2(2)(h) of the Arrangement Agreement. In the event of a Failure to Perform, Canopy Growth will not be required to complete the Acquisition.

 

The Company could fail to receive the necessary regulatory approval

 

The Arrangement is not required to be completed unless the Arrangement receives approval under the United States Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and approvals of each of the TSX, NYSE and CSE, including the approval of the listing of the Canopy Growth Shares to be issued pursuant to the Acquisition on the TSX and NYSE.

 

34

 

 

If Canopy Growth fails to complete the Acquisition or the Acquisition is completed on different terms, there could be a material adverse effect on our business.

 

There can be no assurance that the Acquisition will be completed, or if completed, that it will be completed on the same or similar terms to those set out in the Arrangement Agreement. The completion of the Acquisition is subject to the satisfaction of a number of conditions which include, among others, (i) obtaining necessary approvals, including the Acquisition Regulatory Approvals (as defined in the Arrangement Agreement), (ii) performance by us, and Canopy Growth, of our, and its, respective obligations and covenants in the Arrangement Agreement, and (iii) cannabis production, distribution and sale becoming legal under United States federal law, or being removed from regulation under such law. If these conditions are not fulfilled or waived or the Acquisition is not completed for any other reason, our shareholders will not receive Canopy Growth Shares as consideration for their shares of Acreage, or, if applicable, the Floating Cash Consideration. Certain of these conditions, including the occurrence of the Triggering Event Date, are outside of our control. There can be no certainty, nor can we provide any assurance, that all conditions precedent will be satisfied or waived, or, if satisfied or waived, when they will be satisfied or waived and, accordingly, the Acquisition may not be completed.

 

In addition, if the Acquisition is not completed, our ongoing business may be adversely affected as a result of the costs (including opportunity costs) incurred in respect of pursuing the Acquisition, and we could experience negative reactions from the financial markets, which could cause a decrease in the market price of the Fixed Shares, particularly if the market price reflects market assumptions that the Acquisition will be completed or completed on certain terms. We may also experience negative reactions from our customers and employees and there could be negative impact on our ability to attract future acquisition opportunities. Failure to complete the Acquisition or a change in the terms of the Acquisition could each have a material adverse effect on Acreage’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

If we issue more Fixed Shares or Floating Shares than permitted under the Arrangement Agreement or if we, or one of our subsidiaries, make a $20.0 million payout in certain situations, the holders of our Fixed Shares or Floating Shares may receive fewer Canopy Growth Shares upon completion of the Acquisition.

 

There is a fixed maximum number of Canopy Growth Shares that may be issued in connection with the Acquisition. In the event that we issue more Fixed Shares than the permitted threshold under the Arrangement Agreement or if we or any of our subsidiaries are required to make a payout over $20.0 million in order to either (i) settle, (ii) satisfy a judgment, or (iii) acquire the disputed minority non-controlling interest, in connection with the claim filed by EPMMNY LLC against certain of our subsidiaries, the Fixed Exchange Ratio will be automatically reduced. In addition, in the event that we issue more Floating Shares than the permitted threshold under the Arrangement Agreement, the Floating Ratio will be automatically reduced. Any such reduction of the Fixed Exchange Ratio or Floating Ratio will result in the holders of Fixed Shares or Floating Shares, as applicable, receiving fewer Canopy Growth Shares upon completion of the Acquisition.

 

Risks Related to the Acquisition by Canopy Growth of the Fixed Shares only and not the Floating Shares

 

There is the possibility that Canopy Growth will only acquire the Fixed Shares and not the Floating Shares as part of the Acquisition. If Canopy were to do so then some risks include, but are not limited to: risks associated with holding securities of a company with a majority controlling shareholder; risk that there may not be an active trading market for the Floating Shares; risk that the Floating Shares will not trade at an intrinsic value; risks that the Company will be restricted from pursuing strategic and organic growth opportunities without Canopy Growth’s consent; risk of loss of revenue under the Management Services Agreements; and risks that Canopy Growth may compete with the Company or divert opportunities to its other investees that participate in the U.S. cannabis industry.

 

Additional risks and uncertainties, including those currently unknown or considered immaterial by the Company and Canopy Growth, may also adversely affect the business of the Company or Canopy Growth following the Acquisition of the Fixed Shares only and not the Floating Shares.

 

The Exchange Ratio may be decreased in certain instances

 

There is a fixed maximum number of Canopy Growth Shares to be issued in connection with the Acquisition. In addition, in the event that the Company issues more shares than the permitted threshold under the Arrangement Agreement or if the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is required to make a payout over $20.0 million in order to either (i) settle, (ii) satisfy a judgment, or (iii) acquire the disputed minority non-controlling interest, in connection with the claim filed by EPMMNY LLC against certain Subsidiaries, the Fixed Exchange Ratio will be automatically reduced. Any such reduction of the Fixed Exchange Ratio will result in the shareholders of the Company receiving fewer Canopy Growth Shares upon completion of the Acquisition.

 

The Company will incur substantial transaction-related costs in connection with the Acquisition

 

The Company expects to incur a number of non-recurring transaction-related costs associated with completing the Acquisition which will be incurred whether or not the Acquisition is completed. Such costs may offset any expected cost savings and other synergies from the Acquisition.

 

35

 

 

The Canopy Growth Shares to be received by shareholders as a result of the Acquisition will have different rights from the Fixed Shares and the Floating Shares

 

Following completion of the Acquisition, shareholders will no longer be shareholders of the Company, a corporation governed by the British Columbia Business Corporations Act, but will instead be shareholders of Canopy Growth, a corporation governed by the Canada Business Corporations Act (“CBCA”). There may be important differences between the current rights of shareholders and the rights to which such shareholders will be entitled as shareholders of Canopy Growth under the CBCA and Canopy Growth’s constating documents.

 

The Company and Canopy Growth may not integrate successfully

 

The Acquisition will involve the integration of companies that previously operated independently. As a result, the Acquisition will present challenges to Canopy Growth’s management, including the integration of the operations, systems and personnel of the two companies, and special risks, including possible unanticipated liabilities, unanticipated costs, diversion of management’s attention and the loss of key employees. The difficulties management encounters in the transition and integration process could have an adverse effect on the revenues, level of expenses and operating results of Canopy Growth following completion of the Acquisition. If actual results are less favorable than the Company and Canopy Growth currently estimate, the combined company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity could be materially adversely impacted.

 

The ability to realize the benefits of the Acquisition will depend in part on successfully consolidating functions and integrating operations, procedures and personnel in a timely and efficient manner, as well as on the combined company’s ability to realize the anticipated growth opportunities and synergies, efficiencies and cost savings from integrating the Company’s and Canopy Growth’s businesses following completion of the Acquisition.

 

Most operational and strategic decisions and certain staffing decisions with respect to the combined company have not yet been made. These decisions and the integration of the two companies will present challenges to management, including the integration of systems and personnel of the two companies and special risks, including possible unanticipated liabilities, unanticipated costs, and the loss of key employees. The performance of the combined company’s operations after completion of the Acquisition could be adversely affected if the combined company cannot retain key employees to assist in the integration and operation of the combined company. As a result of these factors, it is possible that the cost reductions and synergies expected from the combination of the Company and Canopy Growth will not be realized.

 

This integration will require the dedication of substantial management effort, time and resources, which may divert management’s focus and resources from other strategic opportunities following completion of the Acquisition and from operational matters during this process. The amount and timing of the synergies the parties hope to realize may not occur as planned. In addition, the integration process may result in the disruption of ongoing business that may adversely affect the ability of the combined company to achieve anticipated benefits of the Acquisition.

 

Canopy Growth may issue additional equity securities

 

Canopy Growth may issue equity securities to finance its activities, including in order to finance acquisitions. If Canopy Growth issues additional equity securities, whether prior to or following the Acquisition, the ownership interest of existing shareholders of the Company in Canopy Growth assuming completion of the Acquisition may be diluted and some or all of Canopy Growth’s financial measures on a per share basis could be reduced. Moreover, if the intention to issue additional equity securities becomes publicly known, Canopy Growth’s share price may be materially adversely affected.

 

Following the completion of the Acquisition, the combined company may issue additional equity securities

 

Following the completion of the Acquisition, the combined company may issue equity securities to finance its activities, including in order to finance acquisitions. If the combined company were to issue additional equity securities, the ownership interest of existing shareholders may be diluted and some or all of the combined company’s financial measures on a per share basis could be reduced. Moreover, as the combined company’s intention to issue additional equity securities becomes publicly known, the combined company’s share price may be materially adversely affected.

 

The Acquisition will affect the rights of the Company’s shareholders

 

Following the completion of the Acquisition, shareholders will no longer have a direct interest in the Company, its assets, revenues or profits. In the event that the actual value of Company’s assets or business, as at the effective date of the Acquisition exceeds the implied value of the Company under the Arrangement, shareholders will not be entitled to additional consideration for their shares.

 

36

 

 

Canopy Growth may be acquired before the completion of the Acquisition

 

In the event of any business consolidation, amalgamation, arrangement, merger, redemption, compulsory acquisition or similar transaction of or involving Canopy Growth, or a sale or conveyance of all or substantially all of the assets of Canopy Growth to any other body corporate, trust, partnership or other entity, but excluding, for greater certainty, any transactions involving Canopy Growth and one or more of its subsidiaries (a “Canopy Growth Change of Control”) before the completion of the Acquisition, shareholders of the Company will not be entitled to vote or exercise any dissent rights in connection with such proposed acquisition, however, all such shareholders of the Company will be bound by the terms of any such acquisition if approved. Accordingly, in the event of the exercise or deemed exercise of the Canopy Call Option or the Floating Call Option following a successful Canopy Growth Change of Control, it is anticipated that shareholders of the Company would receive securities of the entity resulting from such Canopy Growth Change of Control. The projected synergies and anticipated benefits of being acquired by Canopy Growth may not be realized if the Company is acquired in turn by a third-party purchaser or successor entity, as applicable, following a successful Canopy Growth Change of Control. The Company and such third-party purchaser or successor entity may not successfully integrate. If actual results are less favorable than the Company and Canopy Growth currently estimate, the business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity of any such third-party purchaser or successor entity, as applicable, could be materially adversely impacted.

  

Risks Related to the Fixed Shares and Floating Shares

 

We cannot guarantee returns on our Fixed Shares or Floating Shares.

 

There is no guarantee that either the Fixed Shares or the Floating Shares will earn any positive return in the short term or long term. A holding of Fixed Shares or Floating Shares is speculative and involves a high degree of risk and should be undertaken only by holders whose financial resources are sufficient to enable them to assume such risks and who have no need for immediate liquidity in their investment. A holding of Fixed Shares or Floating Shares is appropriate only for holders who have the capacity to absorb a loss of some or all of their investment.

 

Our Fixed Shares and Floating Shares may have a volatile market price.

 

The market price of the Fixed Shares and Floating Shares may be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control. This volatility may affect the ability of holders of Fixed Shares or Floating Shares to sell their securities at an advantageous price. Market price fluctuations in the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares may be due to our operating results failing to meet expectations of securities analysts or investors in any period, downward revision in securities analysts’ estimates, adverse changes in general market conditions or economic trends, acquisitions, dispositions or other material public announcements by us or our competitors, along with a variety of additional factors. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares.

 

Financial markets historically at times have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the market prices of equity securities of companies and that have often been unrelated to the operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. Accordingly, the market price of the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares may decline even if our operating results, underlying asset values or prospects have not changed. Additionally, these factors, as well as other related factors, may cause decreases in asset values that are deemed to be other than temporary, which may result in impairment losses. There can be no assurance that continuing fluctuations in price and volume will not occur. If such increased levels of volatility and market turmoil continue, our operations could be adversely impacted, and the trading price of the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares may be materially adversely affected.

 

Our securityholders resident in the United States may have difficulty settling trades because we operate in the cannabis sector.

 

Given the heightened risk profile associated with cannabis in the United States, capital markets participants may be unwilling to assist with the settlement of trades for U.S. resident securityholders of companies with operations in the United States cannabis industry which may prohibit or significantly impair the ability of securityholders in the United States to trade the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares. In the event residents of the United States are unable to settle trades of the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares, this may affect the pricing of the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares in the secondary market, the transparency and availability of trading prices and the liquidity of these securities.

 

There can be no assurance as to the liquidity of the trading market for our Fixed Shares or Floating Shares.

 

Our shareholders may be unable to sell significant quantities of Fixed Shares or Floating Shares into the public trading markets without a significant reduction in the price of their Fixed Shares or Floating Shares, or at all. There can be no assurance that there will be sufficient liquidity of the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares on the trading market, or that we will continue to meet the listing requirements of one or more of the CSE, OTCQX or FRA or achieve listing on any other public listing exchange.

 

Our Fixed Shares may trade at a price that is not indicative of our performance or at a discount to the Fixed Exchange Ratio.

 

There is no guarantee that the Fixed Shares will trade at a price that reflects our performance or at a price relative to the trading price of the Canopy Growth Shares based upon the Fixed Exchange Ratio. Given the uncertainties regarding the completion of the Acquisition, it is possible the Fixed Shares will trade at a significant discount to the Fixed Exchange Ratio.

 

37

 

 

Our Floating Shares may trade at a price that is not indicative of our performance or the minimum price required to be paid by Canopy Growth pursuant to the Floating Call Option.

 

The intrinsic value of the Floating Shares is indeterminate. There is no guarantee that the Floating Shares will trade at a price that reflects our performance nor at the minimum price required to be paid by Canopy Growth pursuant to the Floating Call Option. Moreover, the Floating Shares will not trade at a price that is necessarily proportionate to the trading price of the Fixed Shares.

 

Our credit agreements contain restrictive covenants which may adversely limit management’s discretion in operating our business.

 

Our credit agreements and the Debenture contain restrictive covenants that limit the discretion of management with respect to certain limited matters. A failure to comply with these terms could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in accelerated repayment and may have a material and adverse consequence on our business, operations or financial condition, on a consolidated basis.

 

If certain U.S. states do not legalize recreational cannabis use within a proximate timeframe, we may not be able to comply with the Initial Business Plan which may result in significant restrictions on the operation of our business and Canopy Growth may not be required to complete the Acquisition.

 

The Initial Business Plan has been prepared based on the assumption that certain regulatory initiatives legalizing recreational cannabis will be approved in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Maine and Ohio within a proximate timeframe. If some or all of the anticipated regulatory initiatives do not occur in the foregoing states within the contemplated timeline, or at all, it will have a significant adverse impact on our ability to meet the Pro-Forma Net Revenue Targets and Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Targets prescribed in the Initial Business Plan, which will likely result in an Interim Failure to Perform that could lead to a Material Failure to Perform and ultimately, a Failure to Perform.

 

Risks Related to our Articles

 

Our Articles contain a forum selection provision under Article 30, which, among other things, identifies the Supreme Court of British Columbia and the Court of Appeal of British Columbia as the exclusive forum for certain litigation. Given that, under United States law, investors cannot waive compliance by us with U.S. federal securities laws, it is uncertain whether the forum selection provision applies to actions arising under U.S. federal securities laws, and if it does, whether a British Columbia Court would enforce such provision. It is also uncertain whether a breach of U.S. securities law in and of itself would give rise to a direct cause of action in British Columbia, although indirect causes of action may arise thereunder as a result of, without limitation, breach, misrepresentation or the like. In the event it was determined that the forum selection provision applies to actions arising under U.S. federal securities laws or, if it did, a British Columbia court refused to enforce such provision or a breach of U.S. securities law did not give rise to a cause of action in British Columbia, there is a risk that we would be required to litigate any such breach in a jurisdiction which is less favorable to us, which could result in additional costs and financial losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Risks Related to the United States Regulatory System

 

Our employees, directors, officers, managers and/or investors could face detention, denial of entry or lifetime bans from the United States for their business associations with us.

 

Because cannabis remains illegal under United States federal law, those investing in Canadian companies with operations in the United States cannabis industry could face detention, denial of entry or lifetime bans from the United States for their business associations with United States cannabis businesses. Entry happens at the sole discretion of U.S. Customers and Border Protection (“CBP”) officers on duty, and these officers have wide latitude to ask questions to determine the admissibility of a non-United States citizen or foreign national. The government of Canada has started warning travelers on its website that previous use of cannabis, or any substance prohibited by United States federal laws, could mean denial of entry to the United States. Business or financial involvement in the cannabis industry in the United States could also be reason enough for United States border guards to deny entry. On September 21, 2018, CBP released a statement outlining its current position with respect to enforcement of the laws of the United States. It stated that Canada’s legalization of cannabis will not change CBP enforcement of United States laws regarding controlled substances and because cannabis continues to be a controlled substance under United States law, working in or facilitating the proliferation of the legal cannabis industry in U.S. states where it is deemed legal may affect admissibility to the United States. On October 9, 2018, CBP released an additional statement regarding the admissibility of Canadian citizens working in the legal cannabis industry. CBP stated that a Canadian citizen working in or facilitating the proliferation of the legal cannabis industry in Canada coming into the United States for reasons unrelated to the cannabis industry will generally be admissible to the United States; however, if such person is found to be coming into the United States for reasons related to the cannabis industry, such person may be deemed inadmissible. As a result, CBP has affirmed that, employees, directors, officers, managers and investors of companies involved in business activities related to cannabis in the United States who are not United States citizens face the risk of being barred from entry into the United States for life.

 

38

 

 

Uncertainty regarding the regulations under the U.S. 2018 Farm Bill, and undeveloped shared state-federal regulations over hemp cultivation and production, may impact our hemp business.

 

The Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, otherwise known as the Farm Bill was signed into law on December 20, 2018. Under Section 10113 of the Farm Bill, state departments of agriculture must consult with the state’s governor and chief law enforcement officer to devise a plan that must be submitted to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture the (“USDA”). A state’s plan to license and regulate hemp can only commence once the Secretary of USDA approves that state’s plan. In states opting not to devise a hemp regulatory program, the USDA will need to construct a regulatory program under which hemp cultivators in those states must apply for licenses and comply with a federally-run program. Even if a state creates a plan in conjunction with its governor and chief law enforcement officer, the Secretary of the USDA must approve such plan. There can be no guarantee that any state plan will be approved. Review times may be extensive. Although interim rules for hemp production under the Farm Bill are now in place federally, the timing of finalized federal rules and regulations, in addition to state specific rules and regulations, cannot be assured. There may be amendments and the ultimate plans, if approved by the states and the USDA, may materially limit our hemp business depending upon the scope of the regulations.

 

Laws and regulations affecting our industry governing operations under the Farm Bill are in development.

 

As a result of the Farm Bill’s passage, there will be a constant evolution of laws and regulations affecting the hemp industry that could detrimentally affect our operations. Local, state and federal hemp laws and regulations may be broad in scope and subject to changing interpretations. These changes may require us to incur substantial costs associated with legal and compliance fees and ultimately require us to alter our business plan. Furthermore, violations of these laws, or alleged violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our operations. In addition, we cannot predict the nature of any future laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, and it is possible that regulations may be enacted in the future that will be directly applicable to our business.

 

The possible FDA Regulation of hemp and industrial hemp-derived CBD, and the possible registration of facilities where hemp is grown and hemp-derived products are produced, if implemented, could negatively affect our hemp business.

 

As a result of the passage of the Farm Bill, at some indeterminate future time, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”)  may choose to change its position concerning products containing hemp, or cannabidiol (“CBD”) and other cannabinoids derived from hemp, and may choose to enact regulations that are applicable to such products, including, but not limited to: the processing of hemp into hemp products and applicability of good manufacturing practices to such processing; regulations covering the physical facilities where hemp is grown and/or processed; and possible testing to determine efficacy and safety of products containing hemp-derived CBD. In this hypothetical event, the proposed products, which we plan to introduce will likely contain CBD and may be subject to regulation. In the hypothetical event that some or all of these regulations are imposed, we do not know what the impact would be on the hemp industry in general, and what costs, requirements and possible prohibitions may be enforced. If we are unable to comply with the conditions and possible costs of possible regulations and/or registration, as may be prescribed by the FDA, we may be unable to continue to operate segments of our hemp business.

 

Our current officers and directors do not have experience in the hemp business.

 

Although management has business experience in cannabis, they have limited experience in the hemp-based product business or retail business. Therefore, without industry-specific experience, their business experience may not be enough to effectively start-up and maintain a hemp-based product company. As a result, the implementation of our hemp business plan may be delayed, or eventually, unsuccessful.

 

39

 

 

USE OF PROCEEDS

 

This Prospectus relates to the Fixed Shares and Floating Shares that may be offered and sold from time to time by the Selling Security Holders. We will not receive any of the proceeds resulting from the sale of the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares by the Selling Security Holders. The Selling Security Holders will receive all of the proceeds from this offering.

 

Assuming the exercise of all of the previously issued Warrants, we will receive gross proceeds of $31,345,056. We do not expect to pay any expenses in connection with the exercise of any the Warrants.

 

The net proceeds from the exercise of the Warrants will be used to fund our working capital and for general corporate purposes. However, there can be no assurance that any Warrants will be exercised.

 

40

 

  

MARKET FOR OUR SHARES

 

Our Fixed Shares and Floating Shares are currently listed on the Canadian Securities Exchange (“CSE”) under the trading symbol “ACRG.A.U” and “ACRG.B.U, respectively, quoted on the OTCQX under the trading symbol “ACRHF” and “ACRDF”, respectively, and are traded on the FRA under the symbols “0VZ1” and “0VZ2”, respectively.

 

41

 

 

SELLING SECURITY HOLDERS

 

With respect to the resale by the February Warrant Selling Security Holders of 4,259,633 Fixed Shares and 1,825,556 Floating Shares, by the Commitment Shares Selling Security Holders of 17,980 Fixed Shares and 7,705 Floating Shares and by the November Warrant Selling Security Holders of 1,556,929 Fixed Shares and 697,666 Floating Shares, the following tables set forth certain information with respect to the below Selling Security Holders including (i) the Fixed Shares and Floating Shares beneficially owned by each Selling Security Holder prior to this offering, (ii) the number of Fixed Shares and Floating Shares being offered by each Selling Security Holder pursuant to this Prospectus and (iii) each Selling Security Holder’s beneficial ownership after completion of this offering, assuming that all of the Fixed Shares and Floating Shares covered hereby (but no other securities, if any, held by each Selling Security Holder) are sold to third parties.

 

The tables are based on information supplied to us by each Selling Security Holder, with beneficial ownership and percentage ownership determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to our shares. This information does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose. In computing the number of Fixed Shares and Floating Shares beneficially owned by each Selling Security Holder and the percentage ownership of each Selling Security Holder, Fixed Shares and Floating Shares subject to stock options or other rights to acquire our Fixed Shares or Floating Shares held by each Selling Security Holder that are exercisable as of or will be exercisable within 60 days after April 22, 2021, are deemed outstanding. Such shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The percentage of beneficial ownership after this offering is based on 72,517,722 Fixed Shares and 31,648,433 Floating Shares outstanding (including 589,165 Fixed Shares and 252,499 Floating Shares held by the Acreage Subsidiary) on April 1, 2021.

 

The registration of these Fixed Shares and Floating Shares does not mean that the below Selling Security Holders will sell or otherwise dispose of all or any of those securities. The Selling Security Holders may sell or otherwise dispose of all, a portion or none of such shares from time to time. We do not know the number of shares, if any, that will be offered for sale or other disposition by the Selling Security Holders under this Prospectus. Furthermore, the Selling Security Holders may have sold, transferred or disposed of the Fixed Shares or Floating Shares covered hereby in transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, since the date on which we filed this Prospectus.

 

42

 

 

     

Beneficial Ownership Before this
Offering

         

Beneficial Ownership After this
Offering(3)

 
Selling Security Holder(1)    

Number of
Fixed Shares
Owned

 

Percentage of
Outstanding
Fixed Shares(2)

   

Maximum
Number of
Fixed Shares
to be Sold
Pursuant to
this
Prospectus

   

Number of
Fixed Shares
Owned

   

Percentage of
Outstanding
Fixed Shares

 
February Warrant Security Holders                              
Investor Company ITF 5J5636 Anson Investments Master Fund LP (4)     1,703,854   2.3 %   1,703,853     0     0 %
Anson Investments Master Fund LP - 6040208925 (4)     283,976   *     283,976     0     0 %
Investor Company ITF 5J5C40 Anson East Master Fund LP (4)     496,957   *     496,957     0     0 %
Investor Company ITF 5J5904 AC Anson Investments LTD. (4)     411,764   *     411,764     0     0 %
Investor Company ITF 5J5988 Anson Opportunities Master Fund LP (4)     298,174   *     298,174     0     0 %
Nomis Bay Ltd (5)     638,945   *     638,945     0     0 %
BPY LTD (6)     425,963   *     425,963     0     0 %
Commitment Shares Selling Security Holder                              
Pilgrim Foresight Fund, LLC (7)     29,271   *     17,980     11,291       *
November Warrant Security Holders                              
William Ryan Goldman     41,703   *     41,703     0     0 %
Tricia M. Hedberg Revocable Trust u/a July 18, 2006 (8)     166,814   *     166,814     0     0 %
Thomas E. Bernard     278,024   *     278,024     0     0 %
Stephen Oplinger     55,604   *     55,604     0     0 %
Jayvee & Co ITF
PDRF0002002 - Pender Corporate Bond Fund (9)
    556,048   *     556,048     0     0 %
Max Bertz     13,901   *     13,901     0     0 %
Matthew Dillig Revocable Trust (10)     27,802   *     27,802     0     0 %
Intrepid Income Fund (11)     111,209   *     111,209     0     0 %
Hanley Foundation (12)     55,604   *     55,604     0     0 %
CKP South LLC (13)     55,604   *     55,604     0     0 %
AMFCO-4 LLC (14)     166,814   *     166,814     0     0 %
Armory Fund LP(14)     27,802   *     27,802     0     0 %

 

43

 

 

* Less than one percent.
   
(1) This table and the information in the notes below are based upon information supplied by the Selling Security Holder.
   
(2) The actual number of Fixed Shares offered hereby and included in the registration statement, of which this Prospectus forms a part, includes, in accordance with Rule 416 under the Securities Act, such indeterminate number of additional Fixed Shares as may become issuable in connection with any proportionate adjustment for any stock splits, stock combinations, stock dividends, recapitalizations or similar events with respect to our Fixed Shares.
   
(3) The “Beneficial Ownership After this Offering” assumes the sale of all shares offered by the Selling Security Holders pursuant to this Prospectus.
   
(4) Anson Advisors Inc. (“AAI”) and Anson Funds Management LP (“AFM”, and together with AAI, “Anson”) are the Co-Investment Advisers of Anson Investments Master Fund LP (“AIMF”), Anson East Master Fund LP (“AEMF”), Anson Opportunities Master Fund LP (“AOMF”) and AC Anson Investments Ltd. (“AC”, and together with AIMF,AEMF and AOMF, the “Anson Funds”). Anson holds voting and dispositive power over the securities held by the Anson Funds. Bruce Winson is the managing member of Anson Management GP LLC, which is the general partner of AFM. Moez Kassam and Amin Nathoo are directors of AAI. Mr. Winson, Mr. Kassam and Mr. Nathoo each disclaim beneficial ownership of these securities except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein. The principal business address of the Anson Funds is Walkers Corporate Limited, Cayman Corporate Centre, 27 Hospital Road, George Town, Grand Cayman KY1-9008, Cayman Islands.
   
(5) Investment decisions for Nomis Bay Ltd. regarding the shares listed above are made by its Director, Mr. Peter Poole. The address of Nomis Bay Ltd. is Wessex House 3rd Floor, 45 Reid Street, Hamilton, HM 12, Bermuda.
   
(6) Investment decisions for BPY Limited regarding the shares listed above are made by its Director, Mr. Peter Poole. The address of BPY Limited is Wessex House 3rd Floor, 45 Reid Street, Hamilton, HM 12, Bermuda.
   
(7) Investment decisions for Pilgrim regarding the shares listed above are made by its Managing Member, Mr. Kevin J. Murphy. The address of Pilgrim is 21 Pilgrim Road Rye, New York 10580.
   
(8) Investment decisions for Tricia M. Hedberg Revocable Trust u/a July 18, 2006 (the “Trust”) regarding the shares listed above are made by its Trustee, Mr. Jeremy Hedberg. The address of the Trust is 420 Mississippi River Blvd., St. Paul, Minnesota 55105.
   
(9) Investment decisions for Jayvee & Co ITF PDRF0002002 - Pender Corporate Bond Fund (“Pender”) regarding the shares listed above are made by its Portfolio Member, Mr. Geoff Castle.  The address of Pender is1830-1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6E 3X2, Canada.
   
(10) Investment decisions for the Matthew Dillig Revocable Trust (the “Dillig Trust”) regarding the shares listed above are made by its Trustee, Mr. Matthew Dillig. The address of the Dillig Trust is 1304 Trapp Lane, Winnetka, Illinois, 60093.
   
(11) Investment decisions for Intrepid Income Fund regarding the shares listed above are made by its Vice President and Portfolio Manager, Mr. Hunter Hayes. The address of Intrepid Income Fund is 1400 March Landing Parkway, Suite 106, Jacksonville Beach, Florida 32250.
   
(12) Investment decisions for the Hanley Foundation regarding the shares listed above are made by Mr. George Hanley.  The address of the Hanley Foundation is 900 Bay Dr. Apt. 904, Miami Beach, Florida, 33141.
   
(13) Investment decisions for CKP South LLC regarding the shares listed above are made by its Managing Member, Mr. Philip DeSantis.
   
(14) Seaport Global Asset Management, LLC (“SGAM”) is the manager of Armory Fund, LP and AMFCO-4, LLC.  Stephen C. Smith is the Chief Executive Officer of SGAM.  The business address of Mr. Smith is 319 Clematis Street, Suite 1000, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 and the business address of SGAM is 360 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, New York 10017.  Mr. Smith and SGAM also have voting control and investment discretion over the securities described herein held by Armory Fund, LP and AMFCO-4 LLC.  As a result, Mr. Smith and SGAM may be deemed to have beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of the securities described herein held by Armory Fund, LP and AMFCO-4, LLC.

 

44

 

 

   

Beneficial Ownership Before this
Offering

       

Beneficial Ownership After this
Offering(3)

 
Selling Security Holder(1)  

Number of
Floating
Shares Owned

 

Percentage of
Outstanding
Floating
Shares(2)

 

Maximum
Number of
Floating
Shares to be
Sold Pursuant
to this
Prospectus

   

Number of
Floating
Shares Owned

   

Percentage of
Outstanding
Floating
Shares

 
February Warrant Security Holders                          
Investor Company ITF 5J5636 Anson Investments Master Fund LP (4)   730,225   *   730,223     0     0 %
Anson Investments Master Fund LP - 6040208925 (4)   121,704   *   121,704     0     0 %
Investor Company ITF 5J5C40 Anson East Master Fund LP (4)   212,981   *   212,981     0     0 %
Investor Company ITF 5J5904 AC Anson Investments LTD. (4)   176,470   *   176,470     0     0 %
Investor Company ITF 5J5988 Anson Opportunities Master Fund LP (4)   127,788   *   127,788     0     0 %
Nomis Bay Ltd (5)   273,833   *   273,833     0     0 %
BPY LTD (6)   182,555   *   182,555     0     0 %
Commitment Shares Selling Security Holder                          
Pilgrim Foresight Fund, LLC (7)   12,544   *   7,705     4,839     *  
November Warrant Security Holders                          
William Ryan Goldman   18,687   *   18,687     0     0 %
Tricia M. Hedberg Revocable Trust u/a July 18, 2006 (8)   74,750   *   74,750     0     0 %
Thomas E. Bernard   124,584   *   124,584     0     0 %
Stephen Oplinger   24,916   *   24,916     0     0 %
Jayvee & Co ITF
PDRF0002002 - Pender Corporate Bond Fund (9)
  249,169   *   249,169     0     0 %
Max Bertz   6,229   *   6,229     0     0 %
Matthew Dillig Revocable Trust (10)   12,458   *   12,458     0     0 %
Intrepid Income Fund (11)   49,833   *   49,833     0     0 %
Hanley Foundation (12)   24,916   *   24,916     0     0 %
CKP South LLC (13)   24,916   *   24,916     0     0 %
AMFCO-4 LLC (14)   74,750   *   74,750     0     0 %
Armory Fund LP(14)   12,458   *   12,458     0     0 %

 

45

 

 

* Less than one percent.
   
(1) This table and the information in the notes below are based upon information supplied by the Selling Security Holder.
   
(2) The actual number of Floating Shares offered hereby and included in the registration statement, of which this Prospectus forms a part, includes, in accordance with Rule 416 under the Securities Act, such indeterminate number of additional Floating Shares as may become issuable in connection with any proportionate adjustment for any stock splits, stock combinations, stock dividends, recapitalizations or similar events with respect to our Floating Shares.
   
(3) The “Beneficial Ownership After this Offering” assumes the sale of all shares offered by the Selling Security Holders pursuant to this Prospectus.
   
(4) Anson Advisors Inc. (“AAI”) and Anson Funds Management LP (“AFM”, and together with AAI, “Anson”) are the Co-Investment Advisers of Anson Investments Master Fund LP (“AIMF”), Anson East Master Fund LP (“AEMF”), Anson Opportunities Master Fund LP (“AOMF”) and AC Anson Investments Ltd. (“AC”, and together with AIMF,AEMF and AOMF, the “Anson Funds”). Anson holds voting and dispositive power over the securities held by the Anson Funds. Bruce Winson is the managing member of Anson Management GP LLC, which is the general partner of AFM. Moez Kassam and Amin Nathoo are directors of AAI. Mr. Winson, Mr. Kassam and Mr. Nathoo each disclaim beneficial ownership of these securities except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein. The principal business address of the Anson Funds is Walkers Corporate Limited, Cayman Corporate Centre, 27 Hospital Road, George Town, Grand Cayman KY1-9008, Cayman Islands.
   
(5) Investment decisions for Nomis Bay Ltd. regarding the shares listed above are made by its Director, Mr. Peter Poole. The address of Nomis Bay Ltd. is Wessex House 3rd Floor, 45 Reid Street, Hamilton, HM 12, Bermuda.
   
(6) Investment decisions for BPY Limited regarding the shares listed above are made by its Director, Mr. Peter Poole. The address of BPY Limited is Wessex House 3rd Floor, 45 Reid Street, Hamilton, HM 12, Bermuda.
   
(7) Investment decisions for Pilgrim regarding the shares listed above are made by its Managing Member, Mr. Kevin J. Murphy. The address of Pilgrim is 21 Pilgrim Road Rye, New York 10580.
   
(8) Investment decisions for Tricia M. Hedberg Revocable Trust u/a July 18, 2006 (the “Trust”) regarding the shares listed above are made by its Trustee, Mr. Jeremy Hedberg. The address of the Trust is 420 Mississippi River Blvd., St. Paul, Minnesota 55105.
   
(9) Investment decisions for Jayvee & Co ITF PDRF0002002 - Pender Corporate Bond Fund (“Pender”) regarding the shares listed above are made by its Portfolio Member, Mr. Geoff Castle.  The address of Pender is1830-1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6E 3X2, Canada.
   
(10) Investment decisions for the Matthew Dillig Revocable Trust (the “Dillig Trust”) regarding the shares listed above are made by its Trustee, Mr. Matthew Dillig. The address of the Dillig Trust is 1304 Trapp Lane, Winnetka, Illinois, 60093.
   
(11) Investment decisions for Intrepid Income Fund regarding the shares listed above are made by its Vice President and Portfolio Manager, Mr. Hunter Hayes. The address of Intrepid Income Fund is 1400 March Landing Parkway, Suite 106, Jacksonville Beach, Florida 32250.
   
(12) Investment decisions for the Hanley Foundation regarding the shares listed above are made by Mr. George Hanley.  The address of the Hanley Foundation is 900 Bay Dr. Apt. 904, Miami Beach, Florida, 33141.
   
(13) Investment decisions for CKP South LLC regarding the shares listed above are made by its Managing Member, Mr. Philip DeSantis.
   
(14) Seaport Global Asset Management, LLC (“SGAM”) is the manager of Armory Fund, LP and AMFCO-4, LLC.  Stephen C. Smith is the Chief Executive Officer of SGAM.  The business address of Mr. Smith is 319 Clematis Street, Suite 1000, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 and the business address of SGAM is 360 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, New York 10017.  Mr. Smith and SGAM also have voting control and investment discretion over the securities described herein held by Armory Fund, LP and AMFCO-4 LLC.  As a result, Mr. Smith and SGAM may be deemed to have beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of the securities described herein held by Armory Fund, LP and AMFCO-4, LLC.

 

46

 

 

DILUTION

 

Fixed Share Dilution

 

Net tangible book value per share represents the amount of total tangible assets less total liabilities attributable to the Fixed Share class, divided by the number of Fixed Shares outstanding as of December 31, 2020.

 

After giving effect to the issuance of an aggregate of 4,259,633 Fixed Shares to the February Warrant Selling Security Holders assuming exercise of the February Warrants of $4.00, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value as of December 31, 2020 would have been $79,726,542, or $1.05 per Fixed Share. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $0.18 per Fixed Share to our already existing shareholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $2.95 per Fixed Share to purchasers in this offering.

 

After giving effect to the issuance of an aggregate of 1,556,929 Fixed Shares to the November Warrant Selling Security Holders assuming exercise of the November Warrants in this offering at an exercise price of $3.15, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value as of December 31, 2020 would have been $67,592,336, or $0.93 per Fixed Share. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $0.05 per Fixed Share to our already existing shareholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $2.22 per Fixed Share to purchasers in this offering.

 

Floating Share Dilution

 

Net tangible book value per share represents the amount of total tangible assets less total liabilities attributable to the Floating Share class, divided by the number of Floating Shares outstanding as of December 31, 2020.

 

We have not given effect to the issuance of an aggregate of 1,825,556 Floating Shares in this offering at an exercise price of $4.00 as the market price of Floating Shares as of date of the offering is below the exercise price.

 

Additionally, we have not given effect to the issuance of an aggregate of 697,666 Floating Shares in this offering at an exercise price of $3.01 as the market price of Floating Shares as of date of the offering is below the exercise price.

 

The following table illustrates this calculation on a per share basis for each respective share class and its related exercise price:

 

    Fixed     Fixed     Total  
Underlying warrant exercise price per share   $ 4.00     $ 3.15          
Net tangible book value as of December 31, 2020   $ 62,688,010     $ 62,688,010     $ 89,554,300  
Increase attributable to exercise of warrants under this offering   $ 17,038,532     $ 4,904,326     $ 21,942,858  
    $ 79,726,542     $ 67,592,336     $ 111,497,158  
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share as of December 31, 2020   $ 1.05     $ 0.93          
Dilution per share to investors participating in this offering   $ 2.95     $ 2.22          

 

 

47

 

 

The above discussion and table are based on 71,346,440 Fixed Shares and 30,628,238 Floating Shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020, after giving effect to the Capital Reorganization, and excludes (i) Fixed and Floating Shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and (ii) Fixed and Floating Shares authorized and available for issuance under our equity compensation plan.

 

48

 

 

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data for the periods, and as of the dates, indicated. The (i) consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and (ii) consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 have been derived from the unaudited interim condensed consolidated and the audited consolidated financial statements of Acreage Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

 

The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes presented in this prospectus. Our consolidated financial statements and unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and on a going-concern basis that contemplates continuity of operations and realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.

 

The information set forth below for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations, and should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this prospectus to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of the information presented below.

 

Selected Financial Data

 

      Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)     2020   2019     2018     2017  
                         
Revenues, net     $ 114,545 $ 74,109     $ 21,124     $ 7,743  
Net operating loss       (364,811)   (191,444 )     (41,133 )     (7,047 )
Net loss       (360,118)   (195,162 )     (32,261 )     (9,536 )
Net loss attributable to Acreage       (150,268   (150,268 )     (27,483 )     (8,543 )
Net loss per share attributable to Acreage, basic and diluted       (2.87)   (1.74 )     (0.41 )     (0.19 )
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted       99,980   86,185       66,699       45,076  

 

49

 

 

    December 31,  
    2020     2019     2018  
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 32,542     $ 26,505     $ 104,943  
Total assets     562,053       691,677       554,582  
Total long-term liabilities     204,602       139,730       35,447  

 

50

 

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the consolidated and combined financial statements and the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes presented in this prospectus. In addition to historical information, the discussion in this section contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Future results could differ materially from those discussed below for many reasons, including the risks described in “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

Overview

 

This management discussion and analysis, which we refer to as the MD&A, of the financial condition and results of operations of Acreage Holdings Inc. (“Acreage”, “we”, “our” or the “Company”) is for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. It is supplemental to, and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 and the accompanying notes for each respective period. Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which we refer to as GAAP. Financial information presented in this MD&A is presented in thousands of United States dollars (“$” or “US$”), unless otherwise indicated.

 

This MD&A contains certain “forward-looking statements” and certain “forward-looking information” as defined under applicable United States securities laws. Please refer to the discussion of forward-looking statements and information set out under the heading “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information,” identified in the “Risks and Uncertainties” section of this MD&A. As a result of many factors, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements and information.

 

Acreage is a leading multi-state operator in the U.S. cannabis industry. Our operations include (i) cultivating cannabis plants, (ii) manufacturing branded consumer products, (iii) distributing cannabis flower and manufactured products, and (iv) retailing high-quality, effective and dosable cannabis products to consumers. We appeal to medical and adult-use customers through brand strategies intended to build trust and loyalty.

 

Operational and Regulation Overview

 

We believe Acreage’s operations are in material compliance with all applicable state and local laws, regulations and licensing requirements in the states which we operate. However, cannabis is illegal under U.S. federal law. Substantially all our revenue is derived from U.S. cannabis operations.

 

 

COVID-19

 

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) emerged in Wuhan, China. Since then, it has spread to other countries and infections have been reported around the world. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 a global pandemic.

 

In response to the outbreak, governmental authorities in the United States, Canada and internationally have introduced various recommendations and measures to try to limit the pandemic, including travel restrictions, border closures, non-essential business closures, quarantines, self-isolations, shelters-in-place and social distancing. The COVID-19 outbreak and the response of governmental authorities to try to limit it are having a significant impact on the private sector and individuals, including unprecedented business, employment and economic disruptions. Management has been closely monitoring the impact of COVID-19, with a focus in the health and safety of our employees, business continuity and supporting our communities. We have implemented various measures to reduce the spread of the virus, including implementing social distancing measures at our cultivation facilities, manufacturing facilities, and dispensaries, enhancing cleaning protocols at such facilities and dispensaries and encouraging employees to adhere to preventative measures recommended by local, state, and federal health officials. COVID-19 has had minimal impact on our overall performance but at some locations there has been some impact to our day-to-day operations.

 

51

 

 

Results of Operations

 

The following table presents selected financial data derived from the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. The selected financial information set out below may not be indicative of the Company’s future performance.

 

Summary Results of Operations               Better/(Worse)   Better/(Worse)
in thousands, except per share amounts   Year Ended December 31,   2020 vs. 2019   2019 vs. 2018
    2020   2019   2018   $   %   $   %
Revenues, net   $ 114,545      $ 74,109      $ 21,124      $ 40,436      55  %   $ 52,985      251  %
Operating loss   (364,811)     (191,444)     (41,133)     (173,367)     (91)     (150,311)     (365)  
Net loss attributable to Acreage   (286,588)     (150,268)     (27,483)     (136,320)     (91)     (122,785)     (447)  
Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to Acreage   $ (2.87)     $ (1.74)     $ (0.41)     $ (1.13)     (65) %   $ (1.33)     (324) %

 

52

 

 

Revenues, net, cost of goods sold and gross profit

 

The Company derives its revenues from sales of cannabis and cannabis-infused products through retail dispensary, wholesale, manufacturing and cultivation businesses, as well as from management or consulting fees from entities for whom we provide management or consulting services. As of December 31, 2020, Acreage owned and operated five dispensaries in Oregon (three in Portland, one in Eugene and one in Springfield), four in New York (Buffalo, Farmingdale, Middletown, and Queens), two in New Jersey (Atlantic City and Egg Harbor), three in Connecticut (Bethel, South Windsor and Uncasville), two in Massachusetts (Worcester and Shrewsbury), two in Illinois (Chicago and Rolling Meadows), one in Maine (South Portland), and one in Florida (Spring Hill). Acreage has cultivation facilities in Sinking Spring, Pennsylvania, Sterling, Massachusetts, Syracuse, New York, Freeport, Illinois Sanderson, Florida and Egg Harbor, New Jersey. Acreage also collects management services revenues, substantially all in Maine.

 

Gross profit is revenue less cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold include costs directly attributable to inventory sold such as direct material, labor, and overhead. Such costs are further affected by various state regulations that limit the sourcing and procurement of cannabis and cannabis-related products, which may create fluctuations in gross profit over comparative periods as the regulatory environment changes.

  

Gross profit               Better/(Worse)   Better/(Worse)
in thousands   Year Ended December 31,   2020 vs. 2019   2019 vs. 2018
    2020   2019   2018   $   %   $   %
Retail revenue, net   $ 86,380      $ 54,401      $ 17,475      $ 31,979      59  %   $ 36,926      211  %
Wholesale revenue, net   27,971      18,539      2,969      9,432      51      15,570      524   
Other revenue, net   194      1,169      680      (975)     (83)     489      72   
Total revenues, net   $ 114,545      $ 74,109      $ 21,124      $ 40,436      55  %   $ 52,985      251  %
Cost of goods sold, retail   (51,018)     (33,844)     (10,038)     (17,174)     (51)     (23,806)     (237)  
Cost of goods sold, wholesale   (14,369)     (9,821)     (1,666)     (4,548)     (46)     (8,155)     (489)  
Total cost of goods sold   $ (65,387)     $ (43,665)     $ (11,704)     $ (21,722)     (50) %   $ (31,961)     (273) %
Gross profit   $ 49,158      $ 30,444      $ 9,420      $ 18,714      61  %   $ 21,024      223  %
Gross margin   43  %   41  %   45  %       %       (4) %
n/m - Not Meaningful                            

 

53

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2020 vs. 2019

 

Retail revenue saw a net increase of 59% for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the corresponding prior period. The increase in retail revenue, net of $31,979 for the year ended December 31, 2020, was primarily due to increased demand and production across various states (primarily Connecticut, New York, Florida and Massachusetts), along with impact of CCF which was acquired in June 2020, and further driven by the impact of NCC LLC (“NCC”), a dispensary license holder in Illinois acquired in March 2019, becoming fully operational during the year, coupled with an expansion in sales as adult-use sales became legalized in the state of Illinois in January 2020. These increases were partially offset by the net impact of decreased business in Maryland Medicinal Research & Caring, LLC (“MMRC”) ($557) as well as the divestiture of Acreage North Dakota, LLC ($491), which occurred in May 2020.

 

Wholesale revenue, net increased 51% for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the corresponding prior period. The increases in wholesale revenue, net for the year ended December 31, 2020 were primarily due to increased capacity coupled with growing operations in our Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Illinois and New Jersey cultivation facilities. This resulted in higher yields and product mix in each of the respective markets.

 

Cost of goods sold increased 50% for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the prior period. Cost of goods sold, retail increased in line with the retail revenue increases. Cost of goods sold, wholesale increased as a result of increases to wholesale revenue. In addition, the increase was further driven by the initial set up costs and consequential expansion impact of various cultivation facilities. The suspension of operations at Form Factory Holdings, LLC (“Form Factory”), a manufacturer and distributor of cannabis-based edibles and beverages, since March 2020 further increased costs of goods sold ($824), wholesale as a result of consequential inventory write-offs.

 

54

 

 

The increase in gross profit was driven by the factors discussed above. Gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2020 was 42.9%, compared to 41.1% for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

Excluding Form Factory, the average estimated wholesale price per gram sold during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $6.65 and $6.78, respectively. Excluding Form Factory, the average estimated wholesale cost per gram sold during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $3.16 and $3.30, respectively.

 

Year ended December 31, 2019 vs. 2018

 

The increase in total revenues during the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily driven by acquisitions, which contributed 183%. Acquisitions drove 198% and 118% of retail and wholesale revenue increases, respectively. The remaining increase in wholesale revenue was primarily driven by our Pennsylvania cultivation facility.

 

The increase in total cost of goods sold during the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily driven by acquisitions, which contributed 206%. Acquisitions contributed 217% and 135% to the retail and wholesale costs of goods sold, respectively. The remaining increase in wholesale cost of goods sold was primarily driven by our Pennsylvania cultivation facility.

 

The increase in gross profit was driven by the factors discussed above. Acquisitions contributed 155% to the increase. Gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2019 was 41.1%, compared to 44.6% for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

55

 

 

Excluding Form Factory, the average estimated wholesale price per gram sold during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $6.78 and $7.17, respectively. Excluding Form Factory, the average estimated wholesale cost per gram sold during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $3.30 and $4.03, respectively.

 

Revenue by geography

 

While the Company operates under one operating segment, the production and sale of cannabis products, the below revenue breakout by geography is included as management believes it provides relevant and useful information to investors.

 

Revenue by region               Better/(Worse)   Better/(Worse)
in thousands   Year Ended December 31,   2020 vs. 2019   2019 vs. 2018
    2020   2019   2018   $   %   $   %
New England   $ 48,325      $ 36,875      $ 9,139      $ 11,450      31  %   $ 27,736      303   
Mid-Atlantic   37,300      19,797      3,122      17,503      88      16,675      534   
Midwest   17,347      6,839      20      10,508      154      6,819      n/m
West   10,206      10,598      8,843      (392)     (4)     1,755      20   
South   1,367      —      —      1,367      n/m   —      n/m
Total revenues, net   $ 114,545      $ 74,109      $ 21,124      $ 40,436      55  %   $ 52,985      251  %
                             
n/m - Not Meaningful                            

 

56

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

Total operating expenses consist primarily of loss on impairments, compensation expense at our corporate offices as well as operating subsidiaries, professional fees, which includes, but is not limited to, legal and accounting services, depreciation and other general and administrative expenses.

 

57

 

 

Operating expenses                     Better/(Worse)     Better/(Worse)  
in thousands   Year Ended December 31,     2020 vs. 2019     2019 vs. 2018  
    2020     2019     2018     $     %     $     %  
General and administrative   $ 50,469     $ 56,224     $ 18,647     $ 5,755       10 %   $ (37,577 )     (202 )%
Compensation expense     41,704       42,061       15,356       357       1       (26,705 )     (174 )
Equity-based compensation expense     92,064       97,538       11,230       5,474       6       (86,308 )     (769 )
Marketing     1,820       5,009       1,571       3,189       64       (3,438 )     (219 )
Loss on impairments     188,023       13,463             (174,560 )     n/m       (13,463 )     n/m  
Loss on notes receivable     8,161                   (8,161 )     n/m             n/m  
Write down of assets held-for-sale     11,003                   (11,003 )     n/m             n/m  
Loss on legal settlements     14,555                   (14,555 )     n/m             n/m  
Depreciation and amortization     6,170       7,593       3,749       1,423       19       (3,844 )     (103 )
Total operating expenses   $ 413,969     $ 221,888     $ 50,553     $ (192,081 )     (87 )%   $ (171,335 )     (339 )%
                                                         
n/m - Not Meaningful                                                        

 

Year ended December 31, 2020 vs. 2019

 

General and administrative expenses decreased during the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily due to cost reduction measures and the Company’s overall strategic plan to focus on key, profitable operations. Compensation expense and Equity-based compensation expense remained relatively flat during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the corresponding prior period. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company determined certain businesses and assets met the held-for-sale criteria. In accordance with ASC 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment, the assessed disposal groups for such assets held-for-sale were written down to fair value less costs to sell, resulting in the recognition of a charges of $11,003 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company recognized an impairment losses of $188,023 on certain intangible assets and capital assets during the year December 31, 2020 as a result of our impairment testing, primarily due to declines in future cash flow projections at Form Factory and certain cannabis licenses and management services contracts. These impairments resulted in the recognition of a tax provision benefit and an associated reversal of deferred tax liabilities of $31,498 year ended December 31, 2020. The Company recognized a loss on notes receivable and associated accrued interest during the year ended December 31, 2020, as it was determined that the notes were no longer collectible. The increase in Loss from legal settlements was driven by the recognition of litigation accruals during the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

Year ended December 31, 2019 vs. 2018

 

Increases to compensation expenses during the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily driven by stock compensation to attract and retain talent and increased headcount to scale our operations. Increases to general and administrative expenses were primarily driven by the increased volume and complexity of services such as legal and other professional services required as the Company’s operations increased during the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company recognized an impairment loss on certain intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2019 as a result of our annual impairment testing, primarily due to declines in future cash flow projections at Form Factory and certain management services contracts.

 

58

 

 

Total other income (loss)

 

Other income (loss)                     Better/(Worse)     Better/(Worse)  
in thousands   Year Ended December 31,     2020 vs. 2019     2019 vs. 2018  
    2020     2019     2018     $     %     $     %  
Income (loss) from investments, net   $ 98     $ (480 )   $ 21,777     $ 578       n/m     $ (22,257 )     n/m  
Interest income from loans receivable     6,695       3,978       1,178       2,717       68       2,800       238  
Interest expense     (15,853 )     (1,194 )     (4,617 )     (14,659 )     n/m       3,423       74  
Other loss, net     (3,487 )     (1,033 )     (7,930 )     (2,454 )     (238 )     6,897       87  
Total other (loss) income   $ (12,547 )   $ 1,271     $ 10,408     $ (13,818 )     n/m     $ (9,137 )     (88 )
                                                         
n/m - Not Meaningful                                                        

 

Year ended December 31, 2020 vs. 2019

 

Income from investments, net increased during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to the corresponding prior period, primarily due to increased ownership interest resulting from the internalization of GreenAcreage Real Estate (“GreenAcreage”) as well as the mark-to-market fluctuations in our portfolio. This increase is partially offset by the impact of the equity method investment described in Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements, as well as the absence of treasury bills during the year ended December 31, 2020. Interest expense increased during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to the corresponding prior period, primarily due to the effects of increased financing transactions as well as the Company’s failed sale-leaseback transactions. Interest income from loans receivable increased during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to the corresponding prior period, as our amount of outstanding loans increased. The increase in Other loss, net was primarily driven by losses from asset sales and disposals partially offset by gains on certain capital assets sold and exchanged (refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 for further information) during the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

Year ended December 31, 2019 vs. 2018

 

The decline in income (loss) from investments, net was due to the roll up of our investments to consolidated subsidiaries during the year ended December 31, 2019. The improvement to other loss, net was driven by increased expenses related to our public listing incurred during the year ended December 31, 2019. The decline in interest expense was due to the conversion of our convertible notes to equity at the time of our public listing. Interest income from loans receivable increased as our amount of outstanding loans increased.

 

59

 

 

Net loss

 

Net loss                     Better/(Worse)     Better/(Worse)  
in thousands   Year Ended December 31,     2020 vs. 2019     2019 vs. 2018  
    2020     2019     2018     $     %     $     %  
Net loss   $ (360,118 )   $ (195,162 )   $ (32,261 )   $ (164,956 )     (85 )%   $ (162,901 )     (505 )%
Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interests   $ (73,530 )   $ (44,894 )   $ (4,778 )   $ (28,636 )     (64 )     (40,116 )     (840 )
Net loss attributable to Acreage Holdings, Inc.   $ (286,588 )   $ (150,268 )   $ (27,483 )   $ (136,320 )     (91 )%   $ (122,785 )     (447 )%
                                                         
n/m - Not Meaningful                                                        

 

The increases in net loss are driven by the factors discussed above.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

Liquidity

 

Sources and uses of cash

 

Our primary uses of capital include acquisitions, capital expenditures, servicing of outstanding debt and operating expense. Our primary sources of capital include funds generated by cannabis sales as well as financing activities. Through December 31, 2020, we have primarily used private financing as a source of liquidity for short-term working capital needs and general corporate purposes.

 

The Company’s significant financing transactions for the year ended December 31, 2020 are as follows:

 

In February 2020, the Company raised $27,887, net of issuance costs, from a private placement of 6,085 special warrants priced at $4.93 per special warrant. The warrants were automatically exercised into units of the Company in March 2020 for no additional consideration, with each unit consisting of one SVS and one SVS purchase warrant with an exercise price of $5.80 and an expiry date of February 10, 2025.

 

In March 2020, the Company borrowed $21,000 from an institutional lender pursuant to a credit facility. The credit facility permits the Company to borrow up to $100,000, which may be drawn down by the Company in four tranches, maturing 2 years from the date of the first draw down. The Company will pay an annual interest rate of 3.55% on the first advance of debt for a term of two years. The borrowed amounts under the credit facility are fully collateralized by $22,000 of restricted cash, which was borrowed pursuant to the loan transaction described below. Any additional draws must be fully cash collateralized as well.

 

Additionally, in March 2020, the Company closed $22,000 in borrowings pursuant to a loan transaction with IP Investment Company, LLC. The maturity date is 366 days from the closing date of the loan transaction (refer to Note 10, 14 and 17 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 for further discussion).

 

In May 2020, the Company reached a definitive agreement with an institutional lender for $50,000 of financing commitments under a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement. The investor may, at its discretion, purchase, and the Company may, at its discretion, periodically sell to the investor up to $35,000 and $15,000 of the Company’s Fixed Shares and Floating Shares, respectively at a purchase price of 95% of the market price over the course of 24 months from the effective date (refer to Note 10 and 17 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 for further discussion).

 

Additionally, in May 2020, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement an investor, pursuant to which the Company sold and issued $11,000 in principal amount under a secured convertible debenture, with gross proceeds to the Company of $10,000 before transaction fees (the “Convertible Debenture”).

 

On June 16, 2020, the Company entered into a short-term definitive funding agreement with an institutional investor for gross proceeds of $15,000 (less transaction costs of approximately $943) (the “Bridge Loan”). The secured note has a maturity date of four months and bears an interest rate of 60% per annum. It is secured by, among other items, the Company’s cannabis operations in Illinois, New Jersey and Florida, as well as the Company’s U.S. intellectual property.

 

In September 2020, the Company closed on a financing transaction described in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 where a subsidiary of Canopy Growth advanced gross proceeds of $50,000 (less transaction costs of approximately $4,025) to Universal Hemp, LLC, an affiliate of the Company, pursuant to the terms of a secured debenture. In accordance with the terms of the debenture, the funds cannot be used, directly or indirectly, in connection with or for any cannabis or cannabis-related operations in the United States, unless and until such operations comply with all applicable laws of the United States. An additional $50,000 may be advanced pursuant to the debenture subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions by Universal Hemp, LLC.

 

Additionally, in September 2020, the Company received gross proceeds of $33,000 (less transaction costs of approximately $959) from an institutional lender and used a portion of the proceeds to retire its short-term $11,000 Convertible Debenture and its short-term Bridge Loan aggregating approximately $18,000 in October 2020. The loan is unsecured, matures in three years and bears interest at a 7.5% annual interest rate (refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 “September 2020 Transactions” for additional disclosures regarding the Institutional Lender and the Investment Partnership).

 

60

 

 

In October 2020, the Company’s subsidiary received initial commitments and funding from a syndicate of lenders gross of $28,000 (less origination discounts and issuance costs of approximately $840 and $1,136, respectively) pursuant to a senior secured term loan facility at an annual interest rate of 15% with a maturity of 4 years from closing. The total amount available under the senior secured term loan facility is $70,000 (refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 for further discussion).

 

In November 2020, the Company entered into a loan agreement with a cannabis-focused real estate investment trust for a construction financing loan in the amount of $13,320 (with transaction costs of approximately $1,399). The loan agreement provides for an annual interest rate of 16% and a term of 18 months. The loan will be used to complete the expansion of the Company’s cultivation and processing factory in Illinois (the “Illinois Property”). The loan is secured by the Illinois Property and is subject to periodic advances to the Company to fund the completion of improvements or real property collateral or fund other amounts as permitted under the loan agreement.

 

Our ability to fund our operations, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and other obligations depends on our future operating performance and ability to obtain financing, which are subject to prevailing economic conditions, as well a financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.

 

We expect that our cash on hand and cash flows from operations, along with our ability to obtain private and/or public financing, will be adequate to support the capital needs of the existing operations as well as expansion plans for the next 12 months. While our liquidity risk has increased since our RTO transaction as a result of the Company’s rapid growth and continued expansion resulting in negative operating cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2020, we believe we have alleviated the risk. See Item 7A - “Liquidity Risk”.

 

Cash flows

 

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash were $54,639 as of December 31, 2020, an increase of $28,039 from December 31, 2019. The following table details the change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

 

Cash flows                     Better/(Worse)     Better/(Worse)  
in thousands   Year Ended December 31,     2020 vs. 2019     2019 vs. 2018  
    2020     2019     2018     $     %     $     %  
Net cash used in operating activities   $ (67,678 )   $ (70,879 )   $ (35,536 )   $ 3,201       5 %   $ (35,343 )     (99 )%
Net cash used in investing activities     (69,302 )     (14,609 )     (235,692 )     (54,693 )     (374 )     221,083       94  
Net cash provided by financing activities     165,019       7,050       359,766       157,969       n/m       (352,716 )     (98 )
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash   $ 28,039     $ (78,438 )   $ 88,538     $ 106,477       n/m     $ (166,976 )     n/m  
                                                         
n/m - Not Meaningful                                                        

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

Cash used in operating activities was relatively flat during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared with the corresponding prior period.

 

The increases in cash used in operating activities were primarily driven by an increase in general and administrative and compensation expenses during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

Cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the corresponding prior period, was primarily driven by the long-term investments of $35,067, the acquisition of Compassionate Care Foundation, Inc. (“CCF”) for $9,983, net of cash acquired, $15,477 spent on capital expenditures to build out our owned operations and $14,809 advanced to entities, net of collections, with which we have a management or consulting services arrangement. This is partially offset by proceeds received from the sale of capital assets and the proceeds from the sale of Acreage North Dakota, LLC for $4,756 and $997, respectively.

 

Cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily driven by the maturing of short-term investments, which contributed $149,828. Offsetting this cash receipt were cash disbursements of $77,617 spent on the advanced payments and purchases of cannabis license holders and management contracts, $47,085 spent on capital expenditures to build out our owned operations and $35,981 advanced to entities, net of collections, with which we have a management or consulting services arrangement.

 

61

 

 

Cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2018 was primarily driven by the purchase of $148,684 in short-term investments, $61,267 spent on the advanced payments and purchases of cannabis license holders and management contracts, $22,351 spent on capital expenditures to build out our owned operations, and $10,964 advanced to entities, net of collections, with which we have a management or consulting services arrangement. Proceeds of $9,634 related to the sale of an investment partially offset these outflows.

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

Cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily driven by proceeds from raising $31,117 as a result of the proceeds from a private placement and the issuance of warrants, $160,587 related to financing proceeds, $7,100 of related party debt proceeds, as well as $22,000 related to collateral received pursuant to a portion of the financing proceeds. This is partially offset by the repayment debt of $25,821, repayment of short-term related party debt of $22,100 as well as payments of deferred financing costs of $7,864.

 

Cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily driven by proceeds from financing of $19,052 related to sale-leaseback transactions that were subsequently classified as finance leases and $15,000 in proceeds from short-term related party debt, partially offset by $12,333 in debt repayments and $10,306 paid to settle taxes withheld.

 

Cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2018 was primarily driven by $298,644 in net proceeds from the private placement that preceded the RTO and $116,890 in net proceeds from our Series E funding round. Partially offsetting these proceeds were payments of $21,054 to settle tax obligations on behalf of certain investors, $19,643 used to purchase additional ownership in non-controlling interests and $17,838 in debt repayments.

 

Capital Resources

 

Capital structure and debt

 

Our debt outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 is as follows:

 

Debt balances   December 31, 2020     December 31, 2019  
NCCRE loan   $ 470     $ 492  
Seller’s notes     2,581       2,810  
Related party debt           15,000  
Financing liability (related party)     15,253       19,052  
Finance lease liabilities     5,174       6,132  
3.55% Credit facility due 2022     20,043        
3.55% Credit facility collateral (related party)     22,169        
Convertible debenture            
Bridge loan            
7.5% Loan due 2023 (related party)     32,124        
6.1% Secured debenture due 2030 (related party)     46,085        
Hempco Foros promissory note     2,000        
Senior secured term loan facility     22,870        
Construction financing loan     4,438        
Canwell settlement promissory note     7,250        
Total debt   $ 180,457     $ 43,486  
Less: current portion of debt     27,139       15,300  
Total long-term debt   $ 153,318     $ 28,186  

  

62

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

Commitments

 

The Company provides revolving lines of credit to several of its portfolio companies. Refer to Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 for further information.

 

Definitive agreements

 

On April 17, 2019, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Deep Roots, a vertically integrated license holder in Nevada, for consideration of 4,762 High Street units and $20,000 in cash. We announced the termination of the agreement by Deep Roots on April 3, 2020 following March 31, 2020, the end date for consummating the transaction. The agreement was terminated due to the ongoing moratorium imposed by the Nevada Department of Taxation. The delay prevented the parties from obtaining the consents, approvals and authorizations necessary to consummate the merger prior to the outside date provided in the agreement.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all ownership interests in GCCC Management, LLC, a management company overseeing the operations of Greenleaf Compassionate Care Center, Inc., a non-profit cultivation and processing facility in Rhode Island, for cash consideration of $10,000. The agreement terminated in April 2020.

 

On February 25, 2020, we entered into an agreement to sell all of our operations in Florida for an aggregate purchase price of $60,000. The sale is expected to close during the second quarter of 2021 subject to customary closing conditions including the procurement of all necessary approvals for the transfer to the Buyer of the Florida license for the operation of the medical marijuana businesses.

 

Surety bonds

 

The Company has indemnification obligations with respect to surety bonds primarily used as security against non-performance in the amount of $5,000 as of December 31, 2020, for which no liabilities are recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

 

The Company is subject to other capital commitments and similar obligations. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, such amounts were not material.

 

Contingencies

 

As of December 31, 2020, the Company had maximum obligations of $8,750 and 280 Fixed Shares and 120 Floating Shares, related to consulting fees payable which are contingent upon successful acquisition of certain state cannabis licenses. No reserve for the contingencies has been recorded as of December 31, 2020.

 

The Company’s operations are subject to a variety of local and state regulations. Failure to comply with one or more of those regulations could result in fines, restrictions on its operations, or losses of permits that could result in the Company ceasing operations. While management of the Company believes that the Company is in compliance with applicable local and state regulations as of December 31, 2020, cannabis regulations continue to evolve and are subject to differing interpretations. As a result, the Company may be subject to regulatory fines, penalties, or restrictions in the future.

 

The Company may be, from time to time, subject to various administrative, regulatory and other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Contingent liabilities associated with legal proceedings are recorded when a liability is probable, and the contingent liability can be reasonably estimated.

 

Standby Equity Distribution Definitive Agreement

 

On May 29, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement with an institutional lender for $50,000 of financing commitments under a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (“SEDA”). The investor may, at its discretion, purchase, and the Company may, at its discretion, periodically sell to the investor, up to $35,000 and $15,000 of the Company’s Fixed Shares and Floating Shares, respectively, at a purchase price of 95% of the market price over the course of 24 months from the effective date. In consideration for entering the SEDA, the Company issued the investor 200 SVS as commitment shares. Pursuant to the Amended Arrangement, the shares have since been exchanged for 140 Fixed Shares and 60 Floating Shares.

 

On each of September 28, 2020 and January 25, 2021, the Company entered into letter agreements (the “Letter Agreements”) with the institutional investor extending the termination deadline of the SEDA to the earliest of November 30, 2020 and June 30, 2021, respectively, and the date that we have obtained both a receipt from the Ontario Securities Commission for a short-form final base shelf prospectus and a declaration from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission that its registration statement is effective, in each case qualifying an At-The-Market equity offering program. On March 11, 2021, the SEDA termination deadline was further extended to April 15, 2022.

 

63

 

 

Contractual obligations

 

Our contractual obligations include amounts reflected on our balance sheet, as well as off-balance sheet arrangements. As of December 31, 2020, our significant contractual arrangements were as follows:

 

Contractual obligations                              
in thousands   Total     Less than
1 year
    1-3 years     3-5 years     5+ years  
Off-balance sheet arrangements                                        
Purchase obligations   $                          
                                         
On-balance sheet arrangements                                        
Operating lease obligations     30,935       4,733       6,208       5,881       14,113  
Finance lease obligations     16,887       680       1,423       1,509       13,275  
Debt obligations     160,030       27,139       62,353       24,453       46,085  
Total   $ 207,852     $ 32,552     $ 69,984     $ 31,843     $ 73,473  

 

Critical accounting policies and estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The estimates and underlying assumptions are evaluated on an ongoing basis and are based on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable.

 

The estimates and assumptions management believes could have a significant impact on our financial statements are discussed below. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

Taxes

 

Provisions for taxes are made using the best estimate of the amount expected to be paid based on a qualitative assessment of all relevant factors. The Company reviews the adequacy of these provisions at the end of the reporting period. It is possible, however, that at some future date, an additional liability could result from audits by taxing authorities. If the final outcome of these tax-related matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will affect the tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made.

 

64

 

 

Business combinations

 

The Company must assess whether an entity being purchased constitutes a business, which requires an assessment of inputs and processes in place at the acquiree. The fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management to make significant estimates. Judgment is required to determine when the Company gains control of an investment. This requires an assessment of the relevant activities of the investee that significantly affect its returns, including operating and capital expenditure decision-making, financing of the investee, key management personnel changes and when decisions in relation to those activities are under the control of the Company or require unanimous consent from the investors. Investments in which the Company does not gain control are accounted for as equity-method investments (if the Company has significant influence) or as investments held at fair value with changes recognized through net income (if the Company has no significant influence). Refer to Note 3 and Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 for further discussion.

 

Impairment on notes receivable

 

At each reporting date the Company assesses whether the credit risk on its promissory notes receivable has increased significantly since initial recognition.

 

Impairment of intangible assets

 

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not subject to amortization and are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that they might be impaired. Finite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets are tested for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

 

Indefinite-lived and long-lived intangible assets are tested at the individual business unit level, which is the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of other assets and liabilities. In testing for impairment, indefinite-lived intangibles and long-lived intangible assets are tested before goodwill. Indefinite-lived intangibles, long-lived assets and goodwill are first assessed qualitatively to determine whether it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired.

 

If it is determined qualitatively that an asset is likely impaired, a quantitative assessment will be performed. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed quantitatively by determining the present value of discounted cash flows and comparing it to the carrying amount of such assets. Finite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets are tested for impairment by determining the undiscounted cash flows expected from the use and eventual disposition of the asset, and comparing it to its carrying amount. Goodwill is tested quantitatively by determining the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing it to the carrying amount, including goodwill, of the reporting unit. If the fair value is greater than the reporting unit’s carrying value, the goodwill is not deemed impaired. If the fair value is less than the carrying amount, the implied fair value of goodwill must be determined to compare to the carrying value of the goodwill.

 

As of December 31, 2020, our goodwill held at our single reportable segment was $31,922.

 

The Company estimated the recoverable amounts of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets by estimating the higher of their fair value less costs of disposal and value in use, which are Level 3 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. The key assumptions that drove management's determination of the recoverable amounts of the reporting units were:

 

Revenue multiples of comparable industry peers.
Expected proceeds from a sale in an orderly transaction.
Expected cash flows based on our business plans for the reporting units and underlying assets.
In order to risk-adjust the cash flow projections in determining value in use, we utilized an after-tax discount rate of approximately 11.10%.

 

Management assigned value to each input based on past experience and industry expectations. The tests performed through the year ended December 31, 2020 resulted in the impairment of certain finite and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 for further information. The Company does not believe a slight change in the key assumptions would cause the recoverable amount of any non-impaired reporting unit to fall below its carrying amount.

 

Assets held for sale and liabilities related to assets held for sale

 

The Company classifies long-lived assets or disposal groups as held for sale in the period when the following held for sale criteria are met: (i) the Company commits to a plan to sell; (ii) the long-lived asset or disposal group is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such long-lived assets or disposal groups; (iii) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell have been initiated; (iv) the sale is probable within one year; (v) the asset or disposal group is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and (vi) it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. In accordance with ASC 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment, long-lived assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2020, management determined certain businesses and assets met the held-for-sale criteria. Upon classification of the disposal groups as held for sale, the Company tested each disposal group for impairment and recognized charges of $11,003 for the year ended December 31, 2020 to write the disposal groups down to its fair value less costs to sell. Additionally, all assets and liabilities determined within these disposal groups were transferred into Assets held-for-sale and Liabilities related to assets held for sale on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 for further information. The Company’s determination of businesses and assets which meet the held-for-criteria, including the process of estimating the fair value measurements pursuant to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, requires the use of significant judgements and estimates. Such assets did not meet the criteria for reporting as discontinued operations.

 

Emerging growth company status

 

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”). Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have elected to use this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will be not subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that have made this election.

 

For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we intend to take advantage of certain other exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies including, but not limited to, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We cannot predict if investors will find our Fixed or Floating Shares less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Fixed or Floating Shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Fixed or Floating Shares and our stock price may be more volatile.

 

65

 

 

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the last day of the year in which we have total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more; (ii) the last day of the year following the fifth anniversary of the first sale of common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration under the Securities Act, which is December 31, 2024; (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in nonconvertible debt during the previous three years; or (iv) the date on which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer under the rules of the SEC.

 

Regulatory Disclosures

 

In accordance with the Canadian Securities Administrators Staff Notice 51-352 (Revised) - Issuers with U.S. Marijuana-Related Activities, we have provided in Item 1 a discussion of the federal and state-level U.S. regulatory regimes in those jurisdictions where the Company is currently involved, through High Street, in the cannabis industry. See Item 1 - Regulatory Framework.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

The Company has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments and other risks to which it is exposed and assesses the impact and likelihood of those risks. These risks include market, credit, liquidity, asset forfeiture, banking and interest rate risk.

 

Market risk

 

Strategic and operational risks arise if the Company fails to carry out business operations and/or to raise sufficient equity and/or debt financing. These strategic opportunities or threats arise from a range of factors that might include changing economic and political circumstances and regulatory approvals and competitor actions. The risk is mitigated by consideration of other potential development opportunities and challenges which management may undertake.

 

Credit risk

 

The Company’s exposure to non-payment or non-performance by its counterparties is a credit risk. The maximum credit exposure as of December 31, 2020 is the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and accounts, notes and other receivables. The Company does not have significant credit risk with respect to customers. The Company mitigates its credit risk on its notes and other receivables by securing collateral, such as capital assets, and by its review of the counterparties and their businesses. The Company considers a variety of factors when determining interest rates for notes receivable, including the creditworthiness of the counterparty, market interest rates prevailing at the note’s origination, and duration and terms of the note. The Company determined expected credit losses to be immaterial due to collateral held. Analysis of collateral held and future expected cash flows within the cannabis industry were considered in its expected credit loss assessment.

 

Liquidity risk

 

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. The Company endeavors to ensure that there is sufficient liquidity in order to meet short-term business requirements, after taking into account the Company’s cash holdings. As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s financial liabilities consist of accounts payable and accrued liabilities, lease liabilities and long-term debt. The Company manages its liquidity risk by reviewing its capital requirements on an ongoing basis.

 

As reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit and a negative net working capital (current liabilities greater than current assets) as of December 31, 2020, as well as a net loss and negative cash flow from operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the issuance of these financial statements.

 

However, management believes that substantial doubt of our ability to meet our obligations for the next twelve months from the date these financial statements were first made available has been alleviated due to, but not limited to, (i) access to future capital commitments, (ii) continued sales growth from our consolidated operations, (iii) latitude as to the timing and amount of certain operating expenses as well as capital expenditures, (iv) restructuring plans that have already been put in place to improve the Company’s profitability, (v) the Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (refer to Note 13 and 17 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 for further discussion) and (vi) the anticipated Non-Core Divestitures (refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 for further discussion).

 

If the Company is unable to raise additional capital whenever necessary, it may be forced to decelerate or curtail its footprint buildout or other operational activities until such time as additional capital becomes available. Such limitation of the Company’s activities would allow it to slow its rate of spending and extend its use of cash until additional capital is raised. However, management cannot provide any assurances that we will be successful in accomplishing any of our plans. Management also cannot provide any assurance as to unforeseen circumstances that could occur at any time within the next twelve months or thereafter which could increase our need to raise additional capital on an immediate basis.

 

66

 

 

Asset forfeiture risk

 

Because the cannabis industry remains illegal under U.S. federal law, any property owned by participants in the cannabis industry which are either used in the course of conducting such business, or are the proceeds of such business, could be subject to seizure by law enforcement and subsequent civil asset forfeiture. Even if the owner of the property were never charged with a crime, the property in question could still be seized and subject to an administrative proceeding by which, with minimal due process, it could be subject to forfeiture.

 

Banking risk

 

Notwithstanding that a majority of states have legalized medical marijuana, there has been no change in U.S. federal banking laws related to the deposit and holding of funds derived from activities related to the marijuana industry. Given that U.S. federal law provides that the production and possession of cannabis is illegal, there is a strong argument that banks cannot accept for deposit funds from businesses involved with the marijuana industry. Consequently, businesses involved in the marijuana industry often have difficulty accessing the U.S. banking system and traditional financing sources. The inability to open bank accounts with certain institutions may make it difficult to operate the businesses of the Company, its subsidiaries and investee companies, and leaves their cash holdings vulnerable. The Company has banking relationships in all jurisdictions in which it operates.

 

In addition, the Company maintains cash with various U.S. banks and credit unions with balances in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund limits, respectively. The failure of a bank or credit union where the Company has significant deposits could result in a loss of a portion of such cash balances in excess of the insured limit, which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and the market price of the Company’s Fixed Shares and Floating Shares.

 

Interest rate risk

 

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or the future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate as a result of changes in market interest rates. The Company’s interest-bearing loans and borrowings are all at fixed interest rates. The Company considers cash flow interest rate risk to be immaterial.

 

Capital risk management

 

The Company considers its capital structure to include contributed capital, accumulated deficit, non-controlling interests and any other component of equity. The Company’s objectives when managing its capital are to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern, to meet its capital expenditures for its continued operations and to maintain a flexible capital structure which optimizes the cost of capital within a framework of acceptable risk. The Company manages its capital structure and adjusts it as appropriate given changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust its capital structure, the Company may issue new shares, issue new debt, or acquire or dispose of assets. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

 

Management reviews its capital management approach on an ongoing basis and believes that this approach, given the relative size of the Company, is reasonable. There have been no changes to the Company’s capital management approach during the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

As reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit and a negative net working capital (current liabilities greater than current assets) as of December 31, 2019, as well as a net loss and negative cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2020. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the issuance of these financial statements.

 

However, management believes that substantial doubt of our ability to meet our obligations for the next twelve months from the date these financial statements were first made available has been alleviated due to, but not limited to, (i) access to future capital commitments, (ii) continued sales growth from our consolidated operations, (iii) latitude as to the timing and amount of certain operating expenses as well as capital expenditures, (iv) restructuring plans that have already been put in place to improve the Company’s profitability, (v) the Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (refer to Note 13 and 17 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 for further discussion) and (vi) the anticipated Non-Core Divestitures (refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 for further discussion).

 

If the Company is unable to raise additional capital whenever necessary, it may be forced to decelerate or curtail its footprint buildout or other operational activities until such time as additional capital becomes available. Such limitation of the Company’s activities would allow it to slow its rate of spending and extend its use of cash until additional capital is raised. However, management cannot provide any assurances that we will be successful in accomplishing any of our plans. Management also cannot provide any assurance as to unforeseen circumstances that could occur at any time within the next twelve months or thereafter which could increase our need to raise additional capital on an immediate basis.

 

67

 

 

BUSINESS

 

Introduction

 

Acreage Holdings, Inc. is a vertically integrated, multi-state operator in the U.S. cannabis industry. Our operations include (i) cultivating cannabis plants, (ii) manufacturing branded consumer products, (iii) distributing cannabis flower and manufactured products, and (iv) retailing high-quality, effective and dosable cannabis products to consumers. We appeal to medical and adult recreational use (“adult-use”) customers through brand strategies intended to build trust and loyalty.

 

We are a British Columbia company that began trading on the Canadian Securities Exchange on November 15, 2018 following the completion of the reverse takeover transaction (the “RTO”) between us and High Street Capital Partners, LLC (“High Street”), which is an indirect subsidiary of ours, on November 14, 2018. We were originally incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) on July 12, 1989 as Applied Inventions Management Inc. On August 29, 2014, we changed our name to Applied Inventions Management Corp. We redomiciled from Ontario into British Columbia and changed our name to Acreage Holdings, Inc. on November 9, 2018.

 

Kevin Murphy, our Chairman, began investing in the cannabis space in 2011 with minority investments in dispensaries located in medical-use states on the east coast of the United States. High Street was founded by Mr. Murphy in April 2014 to invest in the burgeoning U.S. regulated cannabis market and, until April 2018, was an investment holding company and engaged in the business of investing in cannabis companies. As part of the formation of High Street in 2014, Mr. Murphy contributed his cannabis related investment portfolio valued at approximately $14 million to High Street in exchange for 20,000,000 Class B membership units of High Street.

 

We and High Street have invested in geographically diverse licensed entities that operate in both the adult-use and medical-use authorized U.S. states. The companies and other entities in which we and High Street have a direct or indirect ownership interest (collectively, the “Subsidiaries”) focus on all aspects of the state regulated cannabis industry. As a result of its experience investing in the industry, and, in many cases, active involvement with the Subsidiaries, High Street’s management gained significant experience in cultivation, processing and dispensing of cannabis and cannabis infused products.

 

From inception until April 2018, when High Street began the process of converting its minority investments in many of the Subsidiaries into controlling interests, the principal business activity of High Street was to provide debt and equity capital to existing cannabis license holders, cannabis license applicants and related management companies which are party to financing and consulting services agreements with High Street-owned entities in certain U.S. states where medical-use and/or adult-use of cannabis is legal. Such investments included straight debt securities (secured or unsecured), convertible debt instruments and/or common or preferred equity securities issued by the Subsidiaries. As an investor in these Subsidiaries, High Street was generally entitled to hold board seats and played an advisory role in the management and operations of such Subsidiaries, which afforded High Street the opportunity to build its institutional knowledge in the cannabis space. Additionally, being an investor in the Subsidiaries provided High Street with the ability to develop a vertically-integrated U.S. cannabis market participant with one of the largest footprints in the industry at the time.

 

High Street is a Delaware limited liability company, or LLC, rather than a corporation. Unlike a corporation, generally all profits and losses of the business carried on by an LLC “pass through” to each member of the LLC. LLC members report their respective shares of such profits and losses on their U.S. federal tax returns. Membership equity interests in High Street are represented by units.

 

Since 2018, we have been, and continue to be, committed to providing access to cannabis’ beneficial properties by creating high quality products and consumer experiences.

 

Strategy and the Acreage Operations Footprint

 

As of the date of this Prospectus, Acreage owns and operates cannabis businesses or has management or consulting services or other agreements to assist in operations in place with licensed operators in 13 states. Through its subsidiaries, Acreage is engaged in, or has management or consulting services agreements in place with license holders to assist in, the manufacture, possession, sale or distribution of cannabis in the adult-use or medical cannabis marketplace in California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon and Pennsylvania.

 

During 2020 as part of an overall strategic plan to focus on key, profitable operations we decided to continue to develop operations in the following nine core states of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Illinois and Ohio. We expect this shift in focus to lead to margin improvements and accelerate our pathway to achieve positive returns.

 

Acreage is dedicated to unlocking the transformational power of cannabis to heal and change the world in order to achieve its full potential in helping all people live better lives. Our mission is to champion and provide access to cannabis’ beneficial properties by creating the highest quality medical and adult-use products and consumer experiences. Our operational strategy to deliver on our vision and mission revolves around four primary areas of focus: (1) cultivation; (2) retail; (3) processing/manufacturing and (4) wholesale. While we focus on these four areas, we have determined that we have just one reportable business segment: the production and sale of cannabis products.

 

68

 

 

Operational Highlights

 

We and entities with which we have management or consulting services agreements have cultivating, processing & manufacturing, wholesaling, and retailing and/or distributing operations in 13 states.

 

We own 20 operational dispensaries. We have or will have management or consulting services agreements, including pending acquisitions, with entities operating 9 dispensaries.

 

We own and operate, or will operate, six cultivation/manufacturing or processing facilities in six states. We have management or consulting services agreements and operate four cultivation/manufacturing or processing facilities in four states. Manufacturing and processing facilities are co-located with cultivation facilities.

 

Cultivation

 

Consistently growing high-quality cannabis is the one of the most important aspects of our business. In general, cannabis cultivation takes place in three settings: indoor, outdoor and in greenhouses. While it is cost effective to grow cannabis outdoors, it is also very hard to control pest infestations without the use of significant amounts of pesticides, and is subject to other risks such as severe weather, diseases and mold. As a result, cannabis grown outdoors is significantly lower in quality than cannabis grown indoors or in greenhouses. Our focus is growing the highest quality medicinal and adult-use cannabis. We therefore currently grow all of our cannabis in indoor and greenhouse facilities, which allows us to grow in organic conditions under ideal climate controls and without the use of pesticides or fertilizers. We require significant capital to build and outfit our facilities. Beginning in October 2019, we began entering into sale and leaseback transactions with a real estate investment trust to finance (See Note 14 of the Consolidated Financial Statements) its cultivation construction and expansions. We will continue to pursue transactions with real estate investment trusts when such transactions are advantageous to us and our shareholders.

 

Acreage or the entities with which it has management or consulting services or other agreements to assist in operations have 10 operating cultivation facilities. As of December 31, 2020, Acreage has 65,612 square feet of canopy for cannabis cultivation. As announced on April 3, 2020, we halted cultivation operations in Iowa and have since surrendered the Iowa license, in part as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Acreage has also temporarily halted cultivation/processing operations in Oregon, in part as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

Retail

 

Acreage both operates licensed retail adult-use and medicinal cannabis dispensaries and has management or consulting services agreements with licensed dispensaries and provides assistance (but does not control) such entities in exchange for fees for such services. We and our contractual affiliates currently operate 29 dispensaries in 10 states. We seek to build out as many dispensaries as we are permitted by state rules and regulations under our existing licenses and we also continually evaluate acquisition targets to expand our dispensary footprint. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we announced the temporary closure of a dispensary in Maryland and the permanent closure of one in North Dakota, and the conversion of a dispensary in Queens, New York to delivery-only, in part as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

We design our dispensaries to provide the best possible experience to our customers. Where possible and to the extent permissible under state law, we feature our own cultivated and manufactured products, but also feature other in-demand medicinal and adult-use products from other producers. Our flagship dispensary brand is The Botanist, which first launched in 2018. However, we also operate retail dispensaries under other names. In each instance, we consider whether to convert dispensaries to The Botanist brand and plan to do so where it makes sense commercially and is permissible by law. We view retail operations as one of our primary sources of cash flow for the foreseeable future.

 

Our flagship The Botanist retail concept brings a unique, consistent and scalable retail design and customer experience to cannabis that appeals to a wide range of adult-use and medicinal cannabis customers nationwide. Emphasizing the holistic and natural qualities of cannabis and delivered in an immersive retail experience that blends nature and science, The Botanist looks to deliver a level of education, sense of community, and welcoming experience lacking in most cannabis dispensaries. The staff is highly trained and knowledgeable to help provide insight and guidance to customers and patients as they explore the far-reaching benefits of cannabis.

 

69

 

 

Processing & Manufacturing

 

In states where we are appropriately licensed, we take the high-quality cannabis flower we grow and process or manufacture that flower into various forms for consumer and patient consumption, including pre-rolls, and concentrated extracts for use in gel caps, edibles, beverages, and vape cartridges. Our manufacturing and processing facilities are capital intensive, and we may enter into sale and leaseback transactions with a real estate investment trust to finance build-outs of our facilities, when such transactions are advantageous to us and our shareholders.

 

Acreage has one of the top extraction teams in the cannabis industry. With our deep technical cannabis experience supported with an in-house data analytics team, Acreage has an agile product development workflow to continuously produce, test and launch new products. Data-driven decision making informs which products to scale in which markets across our footprint, acknowledging the diversity of markets in the United States. Acreage brands all hold the same consumer promise: that we will deliver the best possible cannabis products across all price points.

 

Acreage or the entities with which it has management or consulting services or other agreements to assist in operations have licenses to operate processing and manufacturing facilities in 10 states. In most states, Acreage’s processing facilities are co-located with its cultivation facilities. Depending on the state, these manufacturing and processing facilities primarily produce our developed “House of Brands” products under the brand names The Botanist, Prime, Natural Wonder, and Live Resin Project, as well as licensed brands such as Canopy Growth’s Tweed. We use or plan to use a variety of extraction methods ranging from CO2 to butane to ethanol depending on the product requirements.

 

Wholesale

 

In addition to sales through our dispensaries, we have adopted a strategy of selling our flower and branded products in states with cultivation and processing operations and where allowable by law. We and our contractual affiliates sell branded products to licensed cannabis dispensaries in 9 states. We view wholesale operations as a crucial business strategy for both cash flow generation and distribution of our developed brands for long-term brand building success. We believe our footprint affords us a competitive advantage to building long-term brand equity. We plan to increase wholesale revenue in states where we currently wholesale products and also to begin wholesale operations in new states where allowable by law.

 

70

 

 

Operations Summary Chart By Entity

 

State Entity Adult-Use /
Medicinal
Dispensary
Licenses
Cultivation /
Processing/
Distribution
Licenses
Operational
Dispensaries
Operational
Cultivation /
Processing
Facilities
California3,4,5 CWG Botanicals, Inc.2,5 Adult-Use / Medicinal 3 1
Kanna, Inc. Adult-Use / Medicinal 1
Gravenstein Foods LLC Adult-Use / Medicinal 1
Connecticut D&B Wellness, LLC Medicinal 1 1
Prime Wellness of Connecticut, LLC Medicinal 1 1
Thames Valley Apothecary, LLC Medicinal 1 1
Florida Acreage Florida, Inc.7 Medicinal 1 1 1 1
Illinois6 In Grown Farms LLC 2 Adult-Use / Medicinal 2 1
NCC LLC Adult-Use / Medicinal 1 1
NCC 2 LLC Adult-Use 1 1
Maine Wellness Connection of Maine2 Medicinal 3 1 3 1
NPG, LLC Adult-Use 1 1
           
Massachusetts The Botanist, Inc. Medicinal 3 1 2 1
Michigan1 N/A Medicinal 3
New Hampshire2 Prime Alternative Treatment Centers of NH, Inc. Medicinal 2 1 1 1
New Jersey Compassionate Care Foundation, Inc. Medicinal 3 1 2 1
New York8 NYCANNA, LLC (d/b/a The Botanist) Medicinal 4 1 4 1
Ohio Greenleaf Apothecaries, LLC2 Medicinal 5 5
Greenleaf Therapeutics, LLC2 Medicinal 1
Greenleaf Gardens, LLC2 Medicinal   1 1
Oregon HSCP Oregon, LLC Adult-Use 2 1 2
22nd & Burn, Inc. Adult-Use 1 1
The Firestation 23, Inc. Adult-Use 1 1
East 11th, Inc. Adult-Use 1 1
Gesundheit Foods LLC Adult-Use 2
Pennsylvania Prime Wellness of Pennsylvania, LLC Medicinal 1 1
    Total 36 18 29 10

 

(1) Acreage has a relationship in the state to develop our footprint there, and provides goods and/or services including but not limited to financing, management, consulting and/or administrative services with a license holder in order to assist in the operations of its cannabis dispensary.
(2) Acreage provides goods and/or services including but not limited to financing, management, consulting and/or administrative services with these license holders to assist in the operations of their cannabis businesses.
(3) Separate grow/process licenses.
(4) A distribution license has been issued in this U.S. state.
(5) Acreage has entered into an agreement to acquire CWG. The acquisition remains subject to regulatory approval.
(6) In Grown Farms LLC 2 owns an Adult-Use/Medicinal cultivation and processing license and owns an Industrial HEMP processing license.
(7) Acreage Florida, Inc. d/b/a the Botanist holds one license issued by the Florida Department of Health Office of Medical Marijuana Use (“OMMU”). The one license authorizes the Botanist to cultivate, process, transport, and dispense marijuana products. On April 1, 2020, the OMMU removed the restriction of allowing the licensee to operate up to 40 dispensaries. The OMMU does not impose a limit of the number of dispensaries that the Botanist may operate. On February 25, 2020, we entered into an agreement to sell all of our operations in Florida for an aggregate purchase price of $60.0 million. The sale is expected to close during the second quarter of 2021 subject to customary closing conditions including the procurement of all necessary approvals for the transfer to the purchaser of the Florida license for the operation of the medical marijuana businesses.

 

71

 

 

Marketing and Brand Development

 

Acreage employs full-time, in-house marketing, retail, and product development functions. These functions engage in a range of brand-building activities and strategies, including market research, consumer insights research, new brand development, product innovation, copy & content production, design, packaging, retail operations and sales, to support business performance and growth at the local and national levels.

 

Acreage employs a focused ‘House of Brands’ approach to target specific consumer needs. Our brand development strategy includes in-house organic development where we see opportunities to add value. Acreage sells its developed, acquired, and licensed branded products in 12 states, with plans to significantly increase distribution and expand form factors in 2021.

 

Acreage’s portfolio of product brands includes the following:

 

The Botanist

 

The Botanist is a retail and product brand created to help wellness seekers. We’re here to listen and help guide guests as they discover cannabis and the power of herbal wellness. The Botanist is deeply rooted in health and wellness and focused on the holistic power of cannabis to help people live balanced lifestyles.

 

All The Botanist products (both formulas and devices) undergo rigorous testing and follow state regulations. Many steps are taken to ensure our products are safe for consumption. They are formulated to deliver consistent, repeatable effects through accurate dosing and a passionate legacy of craft cultivation.

 

Superflux

 

Superflux embraces cannabis as a catalyst for creativity, culture, and connection. Its innovative line of raw cannabis concentrates products, extracted from fresh from plants at the height of their maturity, and curated strain selections deliver the most flavorful, aromatic cannabis experience available - welcoming an entirely new level of access to this connoisseur category. Superflux is slated to launch in 2021.

 

Live Resin Project

 

Live Resin Project is expected to roll into Acreage’s Superflux brand, slated to launch in 2021.

 

Tweed

 

Tweed is a Canopy Growth-developed brand; Acreage is responsible for its U.S. expansion. Tweed allows consumers to find their fit, offering an easy-to-understand product architecture. The brand launched in the U.S. with flower and is slated to expand into a full portfolio of classic yet innovative products. Tweed believes in being a good neighbor to the communities we serve, including providing responsible access to quality cannabis throughout our network.

 

Prime Wellness

 

Prime Wellness is a product brand, committed to advancing health and wellness, enabling access to expertly crafted medicine to offer potential alternatives for patients living with a qualifying medical condition, improve the quality of life for patients and caregivers through science and cannabis, and empowering communities with information to better understand the benefits of compassionate and effective use.

 

Prime’s high-quality products are distributed in 100% of Pennsylvania’s medical dispensaries, one of the largest medical cannabis markets in the country.

 

Competition

 

The cannabis industry is highly competitive. We compete on quality, price, brand recognition, and distribution strength. Our cannabis products compete with other products for consumer purchases, as well as shelf space in retail dispensaries and wholesaler attention. We compete with thousands of cannabis producing companies from small “mom and pop” operations to multi-billion-dollar market cap multi-state operators. Our principal multi-state operator competitors include but are not limited to Curaleaf Holdings, Inc., Harvest Health & Recreation, Inc., iAnthus Capital Holdings, Inc., Green Thumb Industries Inc. and Cresco Labs Inc.

 

72

 

 

Sources and Availability of Production Materials

 

The principal components in the production of our cannabis consumer packaged goods include cannabis grown internally or acquired through wholesale channels, other agricultural products, and packaging materials (including glass, plastic and cardboard).

 

Due to the U.S. federal prohibition on cannabis, Acreage must source cannabis within each individual state in which it operates. While there are opportunities for centralized sourcing of some packaging materials, given each state’s unique regulatory requirements, multi-state operators do not currently have access to nationwide packaging solutions.

 

Government Regulation

 

Cannabis companies operate in a highly regulated industry. We are subject to the laws and regulations in the states and localities in which we operate, and such laws vary by state and locality. Where we produce products, we are subject to environmental laws and regulations, and may be required to obtain additional permits and licenses to operate our facilities. Where we market and sell products, we may be subject to laws and regulations on brand registration, packaging and labeling, distribution methods and relationships, pricing and price changes, sales promotions, advertising and public relations. We are also subject to rules and regulations relating to changes in officers or directors, ownership or control.

 

We comply in all material respects with all applicable governmental laws and regulations in the states in which we operate (including the applicable licensing requirements), with the exception of the U.S. federal prohibition of cannabis. We believe that the cost of administration and compliance with, and liability under, such laws and regulations does not have, and is not expected to have, a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Seasonality

 

In certain regions, especially on the West Coast, the cannabis industry can be subject to seasonality in some states that allow home grow. Because homegrown plants are typically harvested in the late summer or early fall, there can be some deceleration in retail and wholesale sales trends during these months as these private supplies are consumed.

 

Intellectual Property

 

As discussed above, we have developed a “House of Brands” that we believe will be valued consumer brands and a key pillar of our business strategy. Accordingly, we protect our brands and trademarks to the extent permissible under applicable law. We have applied for trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office which we believe are protectable under U.S. federal law and have applied for and received trademark protection at the state level. We have also submitted trademark applications in the European Union and Canada.

 

We hold no patents. We also do not have any patents pending.

 

Emerging Growth Company

 

We qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we intend to avail ourselves of exemptions from various requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

 

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have elected to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards. As a result, we will not be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

 

73

 

 

Circumstances could cause us to lose emerging growth company status. We will qualify as an emerging growth company until the earliest of:

 

The last day of our first fiscal year during which we have total annual gross revenues of $1 billion or more;
The last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of our initial public offering, which is December 31, 2024;
The date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period; or
The date on which we qualify as a “large accelerated filer” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (qualifying as a large accelerated filer means, among other things, having a public float in excess of $700 million).

 

Human Capital

 

As of April 1, 2021, we had approximately 665 employees, 615 of whom were in field operations and 50 of whom were in corporate administration and management. We offer our employees opportunities to grow and develop their careers and provide them with a wide array of company paid benefits and compensation packages which we believe are competitive relative to our peers in the industry.

 

Employee safety and health in the workplace is one of our core values. The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored for us the importance of keeping our employees safe and healthy. In response to the pandemic, we have taken actions aligned with the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to protect our workforce so they can more safely and effectively perform their work.

 

The Company’s number and levels of employees are continually aligned with the pace and growth of its business and management believes it has sufficient human capital to operate its business successfully.

 

Acquisitions

 

As part of our strategy to deliver on our vision and mission, we may from time to time acquire entities or licenses to increase our existing presence in states where we or businesses with which we have agreements already operate or to expand our footprint into new states. The consideration we issue in connection with such acquisitions may include cash, equity in Acreage or High Street, notes payable or a mix of these forms of consideration. The following transactions were completed or entered into in 2020:

 

Compassionate Care Foundation, Inc. (“CCF”)

 

In 2020, we completed the acquisition of CCF, a vertically integrated medical cannabis operator in New Jersey with licenses to conduct growing, processing, wholesale, and dispensary operations. On November 15, 2019, we entered into an agreement to acquire CCF, which closed on June 26, 2020. CCF operates a medicinal cultivation and processing facility and medicinal dispensaries in Egg Harbor and Atlantic City. A third dispensary is planned to be constructed in Monroe.

 

74

 

 

Canopy Growth Corporation Arrangement

 

On June 19, 2019, the shareholders of the Company and of Canopy Growth Corporation (“Canopy Growth”) separately approved the arrangement between the two companies, and on June 21, 2019, the Supreme Court of British Columbia granted a final order approving the arrangement. Effective June 27, 2019, the Articles of the Company were amended to provide Canopy Growth with the option (the “Canopy Growth Call Option”) to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company (each, an “Acreage Share”), with a requirement to do so upon a change in federal laws in the United States to permit the general cultivation, distribution and possession of marijuana (as defined in the relevant legislation) or to remove the regulation of such activities from the federal laws of the United States, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set out in the arrangement agreement entered into between Acreage and Canopy Growth on April 18, 2019, as amended on May 15, 2019 (the “Original Arrangement Agreement”).

 

On June 24, 2020, we entered into a proposal agreement (the “Proposal Agreement”) with Canopy Growth which set out, among other things, the terms and conditions upon which us and Canopy Growth were proposing to enter into an amending agreement (the “Amending Agreement”) which, among other things, provided for certain amendments to the Original Arrangement Agreement and, as further amended on September 23, 2020 (the “Arrangement Agreement”) and the amendment and restatement of the plan of arrangement implemented by us on June 24, 2019 ((the “Amended Plan of Arrangement”) to implement the arrangement contemplated in the Arrangement Agreement (the “Amended Arrangement”) pursuant to the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (“BCBCA”)). The effectiveness of the Amending Agreement and the implementation of the Amended Plan of Arrangement was subject to the conditions set out in the Proposal Agreement, which included, among others, approval by: (i) the Supreme Court of British Columbia (the “Court”) at a hearing upon the procedural and substantive fairness of the terms and conditions of the Amended Arrangement; and (ii) our shareholders, as required by applicable corporate and securities laws.

 

The Amended Arrangement was approved by our shareholders at our special meeting held on September 16, 2020 and a final order approving the Amended Arrangement was obtained from the Court on September 18, 2020.

 

Following the satisfaction of various conditions set forth in the Proposal Agreement, on September 23, 2020, we entered into the Amending Agreement with Canopy Growth and implemented the Amended Plan of Arrangement effective at 12:01 a.m. (Vancouver time) (the “Amendment Time”) on September 23, 2020 (the “Amendment Date”).

 

Pursuant to the Amended Plan of Arrangement, among other things, Canopy Growth made a cash payment of $37,500,024 (the “Aggregate Amendment Option Payment”), to our shareholders and certain holders of securities convertible or exchangeable into our shares. Holders of our then outstanding Class A subordinate voting shares (the “SVS”), Class B proportionate voting shares (the “PVS”), Class C multiple voting shares (the “MVS”), and certain other parties, received approximately $0.30 per SVS, being their pro rata portion (on an as-converted to SVS basis) of the Aggregate Amendment Option Payment, based on the number of our outstanding shares and certain holders of securities convertible or exchangeable into our shares, as of the close of business on September 22, 2020, the record date for payment of the Aggregate Amendment Option Payment. The Aggregate Amendment Option Payment was distributed to such holders of record on or about September 25, 2020.

 

Upon implementation of the Amended Plan of Arrangement, our articles were amended to, among other things, create three new classes of shares in our authorized share structure, being Fixed Shares, Floating Shares and Class F multiple voting shares (the “Fixed Multiple Shares”), and, in connection with such amendment, we completed a capital reorganization (the “Capital Reorganization”) effective as of the Amendment Time whereby: (i) each then outstanding SVS was exchanged for 0.7 of a Fixed Share and 0.3 of a Floating Share; (ii) each then outstanding PVS was exchanged for 28 Fixed Shares and 12 Floating Shares; and (iii) each then outstanding MVS was exchanged for 0.7 of a Fixed Multiple Share and 0.3 of a Floating Share.

 

At the Amendment Time, on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Amended Plan of Arrangement, each option, restricted share unit, compensation option and warrant to acquire SVS that was outstanding immediately prior to the Amendment Time was exchanged for a replacement option, restricted stock unit, compensation option or warrant, as applicable, to acquire Fixed Shares (a “Fixed Share Replacement Security”) and a replacement option, restricted stock unit, compensation option or warrant, as applicable, to acquire Floating Shares (a “Floating Share Replacement Security”) in order to account for the Capital Reorganization.

 

75

 

 

As a condition to implementation of the Amended Arrangement, an affiliate of Canopy Growth advanced the first tranche of $50,000,000 of a loan of up to $100,000,000 (the “Hempco Loan”) to Universal Hemp, LLC, an affiliate of the Company that operates solely in the hemp industry in full compliance with all applicable laws (“Universal Hemp”) pursuant to a secured debenture (the “Debenture”) bearing interest at a rate of 6.1% per annum and maturing 10 years from the date thereof. All interest payments made pursuant to the Debenture are payable in cash by Universal Hemp. The Debenture is not convertible and is not guaranteed by Acreage. A further $50,000,000 advance will be made available upon satisfaction of specified conditions precedent. In accordance with the terms of the Debenture, the funds cannot be used, directly or indirectly, in connection with or for any cannabis or cannabis-related operations in the United States, unless and until such operations comply with all applicable laws of the United States. Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 for further discussion.

 

76

 

 

Pursuant to the Amended Plan of Arrangement, upon the occurrence, or waiver (at the discretion of Canopy Growth), of a change in federal laws in the United States to permit the general cultivation, distribution and possession of marijuana (as defined in the relevant legislation) or to remove the regulation of such activities from the federal laws of the United States (the “Triggering Event” and the date on which the Triggering Event occurs, the “Triggering Event Date”), Canopy Growth, will, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions set out in the Arrangement Agreement: (i) acquire all of the issued and outstanding Fixed Shares (following the mandatory conversion of the Fixed Multiple Shares into Fixed Shares) on the basis of 0.3048 (the “Fixed Exchange Ratio”) of a common share of Canopy Growth (each, a “Canopy Growth Share”) for each Fixed Share held at the time of the acquisition of the Fixed Shares (the “Acquisition Time”), subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Amended Plan of Arrangement (the “Canopy Call Option”); and (ii) have the right (but not the obligation) (the “Floating Call Option”), exercisable for a period of 30 days following the Triggering Event Date to acquire all of the issued and outstanding Floating Shares. Upon exercise of the Floating Call Option, Canopy Growth may acquire the Floating Shares for cash or for Canopy Growth Shares or a combination thereof, in Canopy Growth’s sole discretion. If paid in cash, the price per Floating Share shall be equal to the volume-weighted average trading price of the Floating Shares on the CSE (or other recognized stock exchange on which the Floating Shares are primarily traded as determined by volume) for the 30 trading day period prior to the exercise (or deemed exercise) of the Canopy Call Option, subject to a minimum amount of $6.41 (the “Floating Cash Consideration”). If paid in Canopy Growth Shares, each Floating Share will be exchanged for a number of Canopy Growth Shares equal to (i) the volume-weighted average trading price of the Floating Shares on the CSE (or other recognized stock exchange on which the Floating Shares are primarily traded as determined by volume) for the 30 trading day period prior to the exercise (or deemed exercise) of the Canopy Call Option, subject to a minimum amount of $6.41, divided by (ii) the volume-weighted average trading price (expressed in US$) of the Canopy Growth Shares on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) (or such other recognized stock exchange on which the Canopy Growth Shares are primarily traded if not then traded on the NYSE) for the 30 trading day period immediately prior to the exercise (or deemed exercise) of the Canopy Call Option (the “Floating Ratio”). The Floating Ratio is subject to adjustment in accordance with the Amended Plan of Arrangement if Acreage issues greater than the permitted number of Floating Shares prior to the Acquisition Date. No fractional Canopy Shares will be issued pursuant to the Amended Plan of Arrangement. The Floating Call Option cannot be exercised unless the Canopy Call Option is exercised (or deemed to be exercised). The closing of the acquisition of the Floating Shares pursuant to the Floating Call Option, if exercised, will take place concurrently with the closing of the acquisition of the Fixed Shares (the “Acquisition”) pursuant to the Canopy Call Option, if exercised. The Canopy Call Option and the Floating Call Option will expire 10 years from the Amendment Time.

 

At the Acquisition Time, on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Amended Plan of Arrangement, each Fixed Share Replacement Security will be exchanged for a replacement option, restricted stock unit, compensation option or warrant, as applicable, to acquire from Canopy Growth such number of Canopy Growth Shares as is equal to: (i) the number of Fixed Shares that were issuable upon exercise of such Fixed Share Replacement Security immediately prior to the Acquisition Time, multiplied by (ii) the Fixed Exchange Ratio in effect immediately prior to the Acquisition Time (provided that if the foregoing would result in the issuance of a fraction of a Canopy Growth Share, then the number of Canopy Growth Shares to be issued will be rounded down to the nearest whole number).

 

In the event that the Floating Call Option is exercised and Canopy Growth acquires the Floating Shares at the Acquisition Time, on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Amended Plan of Arrangement, each Floating Share Replacement Security will be exchanged for a replacement option, restricted stock unit, compensation option or warrant, as applicable, to acquire from Canopy Growth such number of Canopy Growth Shares as is equal to: (i) the number of Floating Shares that were issuable upon exercise of such Floating Share Replacement Security immediately prior to the Acquisition Time, multiplied by (ii) the Floating Ratio (provided that if the foregoing would result in the issuance of a fraction of a Canopy Growth Share, then the number of Canopy Growth Shares to be issued will be rounded down to the nearest whole number).

 

In the event that Floating Call Option is exercised, and Canopy Growth acquires the Floating Shares at the Acquisition Time, we will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Canopy Growth. If Canopy Growth completes the Acquisition of the Fixed Shares but does not acquire the Floating Shares, the Floating Call Option will terminate, and the Floating Shares shall remain outstanding. In such event, the Amending Agreement provides for, among other things: (i) various Canopy Growth rights that extend beyond the Acquisition Date and continue until Canopy Growth the date (the “End Date”) Canopy Growth ceases to hold at least 35% of the issued and outstanding Acreage shares. These include, among other things, rights to nominate a majority of Acreage’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) following the Acquisition Time, and restrictions on Acreage’s ability to conduct mergers and acquisitions above certain thresholds or incur certain indebtedness without Canopy Growth’s consent

 

77

 

 

The Amending Agreement also provides that Acreage may issue a maximum of 32,700,000 shares (or convertible securities in proportion to the foregoing), which will include (i) 3,700,000 Floating Shares which are to be issued solely in connection with the exercise of stock options granted to Acreage management (the “Option Shares”); (ii) 8,700,000 Floating Shares other than the Option Shares; and (iii) 20,300,000 Fixed Shares, without a revision to the Fixed Exchange Ratio. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Amending Agreement provides that Acreage may not issue any equity securities, without Canopy Growth’s prior consent, other than: (i) upon the exercise or conversion of convertible securities outstanding as of the Amendment Date; (ii) contractual commitments existing as of the Amendment Date; (iii) the Option Shares; (iv) the issuance of up to $3.0 million worth of Fixed Shares pursuant to an at-the-market offering to be completed no more than four times during any one-year period; (v) the issuance of up to 500,000 Fixed Shares in connection with debt financing transactions that are otherwise in compliance with the terms of the Arrangement Agreement, as amended by the Amending Agreement; or (vi) pursuant to one private placement or public offering of securities during any one-year period for aggregate gross proceeds of up to $20.0 million, subject to specific limitations as set out in the Amending Agreement.

 

For more information, please refer to the Amending Agreement included as an exhibit to this Registration Statement.

 

Pursuant to the Amending Agreement, Acreage agreed to submit an Approved Business Plan to Canopy Growth on a quarterly basis that complies with certain specified criteria, including a business plan for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2020 through December 31, 2029 attached as a Schedule to the Proposal Agreement (the “Initial Business Plan”). The Initial Business Plan contains annual revenue and earnings targets for each of Acreage’s fiscal years ending on December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2029, as outlined below:

 

Fiscal Year Ending     Pro-Forma Net Revenue Target (in
US$thousands)
    Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Target
(in US$thousands)
 
2020       166,174       (22,499)  
2021       253,296       36,720  
2022       289,528       53,222  
2023       375,274       102,799  
2024       558,599       166,744  
2025       641,047       190,385  
2026       740,194       218,108  
2027       848,498       244,402  
2028       973,402       273,434  
2029       1,120,177       305,840  

 

78

 

 

A number of factors may cause Acreage to fail to meet the Pro-Forma Net Revenue Targets or the Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Targets set forth in the Initial Business Plan and outlined above. See “Risk Factors”.

 

In the event that Acreage has not satisfied: (i) 90% of the Pro-Forma Net Revenue Target or the Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Target set forth in the Initial Business Plan, measured on a quarterly basis, an Interim Failure to Perform will occur and the Austerity Measures shall become applicable. The Austerity Measures include, among other things:

 

(a) restrictions on Acreage’s ability to issue shares (or securities convertible into shares) other than:

 

(i) upon the exercise or conversion of convertible securities outstanding as such date; and

 

(ii) contractual commitments existing as of the;

 

(b) prohibitions on entering into any contract in respect of Company Debt, other than in respect of trade payables or similar obligations incurred in the ordinary course;

 

(c) granting any options to acquire Fixed Shares or Floating Shares;

 

(d) making payments of fees owed to the Board;

 

(e) making short-term incentive or bonus payments to any Acreage employee;

 

(f) entering into any contract with respect to the disposition of any assets other than inventory in the ordinary course;

 

(g) entering into any contract with respect to any business combination, merger or acquisition of assets, other than assets acquired in the ordinary course;

 

(h) making any new capital investments or incurring any new capital expenditures; and

 

(i) increasing the number of Acreage employees that have a base salary of $150,000 or more or more than five full time employees that would be included in corporate overhead expenditures.

 

The Austerity Measures provide significant restrictions on Acreage’s ability to take certain actions otherwise permitted by the Amended Arrangement Agreement; (ii) 80% of the Pro-Forma Net Revenue Target or the Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Target set forth in the Initial Business Plan, as determined on an annual basis (commencing in respect of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021), a Material Failure to Perform will occur and (a) certain restrictive covenants applicable to Canopy Growth under the Amended Arrangement Agreement will cease to apply in order to permit Canopy Growth to acquire, or conditionally acquire, a competitor of the Company in the United States should it wish to do so, and (b) an event of default under the Debenture will likely occur resulting in the Hempco Loan becoming immediately due and payable; and (iii) 60% of the Pro-Forma Net Revenue Target or the Consolidated Adj. EBITDA Target set forth in the Initial Business Plan for the trailing 12 month period ending on the date that is 30 days prior to the proposed Acquisition Time, a Failure to Perform shall occur and a material adverse impact will be deemed to have occurred for purposes of Section 6.2(2)(h) of the Arrangement Agreement and Canopy Growth will not be required to complete the Acquisition of the Fixed Shares pursuant to the Canopy Call Option.

 

79

 

 

Company Information

 

Our website is http://www.acreageholdings.com. Our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are accessible free of charge at http://investors.acreageholdings.com/docs as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, such as ourselves, that file electronically with the SEC. The Internet address of the SEC’s site is http://www.sec.gov.

 

We also have adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all employees, directors and officers. A copy of the Code of Conduct is available without charge to any person desiring a copy of the Code of Conduct. You may request a copy of the Code of Conduct by submitting written request to us at our principal offices at 450 Lexington Ave, #3308, New York, New York 10163.

 

Our Board Mandate and the Charters of the Board’s Audit Committee and Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee (which serves as the Board’s compensation and nominating committee) are available on our website. All materials are accessible on our website at investors.acreageholdings.com. Amendments to, and waivers granted to our directors and executive officers under our code of conduct or charters, if any, will be posted in this area of our website. Copies of these materials are available in print to any shareholder who requests them. Shareholders should direct such requests in writing to Investor Relations Department, Acreage Holdings, Inc., 450 Lexington Ave, #3308, New York, New York 10163, or by emailing our Investor Relations team at investors@acreageholdings.com.

 

The information regarding our website and its content is for your convenience only. The content of our website is not deemed to be incorporated by reference in this report or filed with the SEC.

 

80

 

 

Regulatory Framework

 

In accordance with the Canadian Securities Administrators Staff Notice 51-352 (Revised) - Issuers with U.S. Marijuana-Related Activities (“Staff Notice 51-352”), below is a discussion of the federal and state-level U.S. regulatory regimes in those jurisdictions where the Company is currently involved, through High Street , in the cannabis industry. High Street is, through its subsidiaries, engaged in, or has management, consulting services or other agreements in place with license holders to assist in the manufacture, possession, sale or distribution of cannabis in the adult-use or medical cannabis marketplace in California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon and Pennsylvania. In accordance with Staff Notice 51-352, the Company will evaluate, monitor and reassess this disclosure, and any related risks, on an ongoing basis and the same will be supplemented and amended to investors in public filings, including in the event of government policy changes or the introduction of new or amended guidance, laws or regulations regarding cannabis regulation. Any non-compliance, citations or notices of violation which may have an impact on the Company’s license, business activities or operations will be promptly disclosed by the Company.

 

United States Federal Overview

 

The United States federal government regulates drugs through the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 811) (the “CSA”) which schedules controlled substances, including cannabis, based on their approved medical use and potential for abuse. Cannabis is classified as a Schedule I controlled substance. The U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) defines Schedule I drugs, substances or chemicals as “drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.” The United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) has not approved cannabis as a safe and effective drug for any condition. The FDA has approved CBD, a component of cannabis, for a narrow segment of medical conditions.

 

State laws that permit and regulate the production, distribution and use of cannabis for adult-use or medical purposes are in direct conflict with the CSA, which makes cannabis distribution and possession federally illegal. Although certain states and territories of the U.S. authorize medical or adult-use cannabis production and distribution by licensed or registered entities, under U.S. federal law, the possession, cultivation, and transfer of cannabis and any related drug paraphernalia is illegal and any such acts are criminal acts under any and all circumstances under the CSA. Although the Company’s activities are believed to be compliant with applicable United States state and local law, strict compliance with state and local laws with respect to cannabis may neither absolve the Company of liability under United States federal law, nor may it provide a defense to any federal proceeding which may be brought against the Company.

 

81

 

 

As of the date of this Prospectus, medical use of cannabis is legal, with a doctor's recommendation, in thirty-six (36) states, four (4) out of five (5) permanently inhabited U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia, with one (1) state pending enactment until a future date. Thirteen (13) other states have laws that limit THC content, for the purpose of allowing access to products that are rich in cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive component of cannabis. The recreational use of cannabis is legal in fourteen (14) states, the District of Columbia, the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam, with two (2) states pending enactment until a future date. Another sixteen (16) states and the U.S. Virgin Islands have decriminalized its use.

 

The U.S. administration under President Obama attempted to address the inconsistent treatment of cannabis under state and federal law in the Cole Memorandum which Deputy Attorney General James Cole sent to all U.S. Attorneys in August 2013 that outlined certain priorities for the DOJ relating to the prosecution of cannabis offenses. The Cole Memorandum held that enforcing federal cannabis laws and regulations in jurisdictions that have enacted laws legalizing cannabis in some form and that have also implemented strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems to control the cultivation, processing, distribution, sale and possession of cannabis, conduct in compliance with those laws and regulations was not a priority for the DOJ. Instead, the Cole Memorandum directed U.S. Attorney’s Offices discretion not to investigate or prosecute state law compliant participants in the medical cannabis industry who did not implicate certain identified federal government priorities, including preventing interstate diversion or distribution of cannabis to minors.

 

On January 4, 2018, then U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions formally issued the Sessions Memorandum, which rescinded the Cole Memorandum effective upon its issuance. The Sessions Memorandum stated, in part, that current law reflects “Congress’ determination that cannabis is a dangerous drug and cannabis activity is a serious crime”, and Mr. Sessions directed all U.S. Attorneys to enforce the laws enacted by Congress and to follow well-established principles that govern all federal prosecutions when deciding whether to pursue prosecutions related to cannabis activities. As a result, federal prosecutors could, and still can, use their prosecutorial discretion to decide to prosecute actors compliant with their state laws. Although there have not been any identified prosecutions of state law compliant cannabis entities, there can be no assurance that the federal government will not enforce federal laws relating to cannabis in the future. Jeff Sessions resigned as U.S. Attorney General on November 7, 2018.

 

On February 14, 2019, William Barr was confirmed as U.S. Attorney General. However, in a written response to questions from U.S. Senator Cory Booker made as a nominee, Attorney General Barr stated “I do not intend to go after parties who have complied with state law in reliance on the Cole Memo.” Nonetheless, there is no guarantee that state laws legalizing and regulating the sale and use of cannabis will not be repealed or overturned, or that local governmental authorities will not limit the applicability of state laws within their respective jurisdictions. Unless and until the United States Congress amends the CSA with respect to cannabis (and as to the timing or scope of any such potential amendments there can be no assurance), there is a risk that federal authorities may enforce current U.S. federal law.

 

The Department of Justice under Mr. Barr did not take a formal position on federal enforcement of laws relating to cannabis. Mr. Barr has stated publicly that his preference would be to have a uniform federal rule against cannabis, but, absent such a uniform rule, his preference would be to permit the existing federal approach of leaving it up to the states to make their own decisions.

 

President Biden has nominated Merrick Garland to serve as Attorney General in his administration. It is not yet known whether the Department of Justice under President Biden and Attorney General Garland, will re-adopt the Cole Memorandum or announce a substantive cannabis enforcement policy. If the Department of Justice policy under Attorney General Garland, were to aggressively pursue financiers or owners of cannabis-related businesses, and United States Attorneys followed such Department of Justice policies through pursuing prosecutions, then the Company could face (i) seizure of its cash and other assets used to support or derived from its cannabis operations, (ii) the arrest of its employees, directors, officers, managers and investors, and charges of ancillary criminal violations of the CSA for aiding and abetting and conspiring to violate the CSA by virtue of providing financial support to cannabis companies that service or provide goods to state-licensed or permitted cultivators, processors, distributors, and/or retailers of cannabis, and/or (iii) the barring of its employees, directors, officers, managers and investors who are not United States citizens from entry into the United States for life.

 

The Company believes it is still unclear what prosecutorial effects will be created by the rescission of the Cole Memorandum. The sheer size of the cannabis industry, in addition to participation by state and local governments and investors, suggests that a large-scale enforcement operation would more than likely create unwanted political backlash for the DOJ. Regardless, cannabis remains a Schedule I controlled substance at the federal level, and neither the Cole Memo nor its rescission has altered that fact. The federal government of the United States has always reserved the right to enforce federal law in regard to the sale and disbursement of medical or adult-use cannabis, even if state law sanctioned such sale and disbursement. The Company believes, from a purely legal perspective, that the criminal risk today remains similar to the risk on January 3, 2018. It remains unclear whether the risk of enforcement has been altered. Additionally, under United States federal law, it may potentially be a violation of federal money laundering statutes for financial institutions to take any proceeds from the sale of cannabis or any other Schedule I controlled substance. Canadian banks are likewise hesitant to deal with cannabis companies, due to the uncertain legal and regulatory framework of the industry. Banks and other financial institutions, particularly those that are federally chartered in the United States, could be prosecuted and possibly convicted of money laundering for providing services to cannabis businesses. While Congress is considering legislation that may address these issues, there can be no assurance that such legislation passes.

 

82

 

 

Despite these laws, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) issued a memorandum on February 14, 2014 (the “FinCEN Memorandum”) outlining the pathways for financial institutions to bank state-sanctioned cannabis businesses in compliance with federal enforcement priorities. The FinCEN Memorandum echoed the enforcement priorities of the Cole Memorandum and states that in some circumstances, it is permissible for banks to provide services to cannabis-related businesses without risking prosecution for violation of federal money laundering laws. Under these guidelines, financial institutions must submit a Suspicious Activity Report (“SAR”) in connection with all cannabis-related banking activities by any client of such financial institution, in accordance with federal money laundering laws. These cannabis-related SARs are divided into three categories - cannabis limited, cannabis priority, and cannabis terminated - based on the financial institution’s belief that the business in question follows state law, is operating outside of compliance with state law, or where the banking relationship has been terminated, respectively. On the same day that the FinCEN Memorandum was published, the DOJ issued a memorandum (the “2014 Cole Memorandum”) directing prosecutors to apply the enforcement priorities of the Cole Memorandum in determining whether to charge individuals or institutions with crimes related to financial transactions involving the proceeds of cannabis-related conduct. The 2014 Cole Memorandum has been rescinded as of January 4, 2018, along with the Cole Memorandum, removing guidance that enforcement of applicable financial crimes against state-compliant actors was not a DOJ priority.

 

However, former Attorney General Sessions’ revocation of the Cole Memorandum and the 2014 Cole Memorandum has not affected the status of the FinCEN Memorandum, nor has the Department of the Treasury given any indication that it intends to rescind the FinCEN Memorandum itself. Though it was originally intended for the 2014 Cole Memorandum and the FinCEN Memorandum to work in tandem, the FinCEN Memorandum is a standalone document which explicitly lists the eight enforcement priorities originally cited in the Cole Memorandum. As such, the FinCEN Memorandum remains intact, indicating that the Department of the Treasury and FinCEN intend to continue abiding by its guidance. However, in the United States, it is difficult for cannabis-based businesses to open and maintain a bank account with any bank or other financial institution.

 

Although the Cole Memorandum has been rescinded, one legislative safeguard for the medical cannabis industry, appended to federal appropriations legislation, remains in place. Currently referred to as the “Rohrabacher-Blumenauer Amendment”, this so-called “rider” provision has been appended to the Consolidated Appropriations Acts for fiscal years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019. Under the terms of the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer rider, the federal government is prohibited from using congressionally appropriated funds to enforce federal cannabis laws against regulated medical cannabis actors operating in compliance with state and local law. On December 20, 2019, then President Donald Trump signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 which included the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer Amendment, which prohibits the funding of federal prosecutions with respect to medical cannabis activities that are legal under state law. On December 27, 2020, the omnibus spending bill passed including the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer Amendment, extending its application until September 30, 2021. There can be no assurances that the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer Amendment will be included in future appropriations bills to prevent the federal government from using congressionally appropriated funds to enforce federal cannabis laws against regulated medical cannabis actors operating in compliance with state and local law.

 

Despite the legal, regulatory, and political obstacles the cannabis industry currently faces, the industry has continued to grow. It was anticipated that the federal government would eventually repeal the federal prohibition on cannabis and thereby leave the states to decide for themselves whether to permit regulated cannabis cultivation, production and sale, just as states are free today to decide policies governing the distribution of alcohol or tobacco.

 

Given current political trends, however, these developments are considered unlikely in the near-term. As an industry best practice, despite the recent rescission of the Cole Memorandum, the Company abides by the following to ensure compliance with the guidance provided by the Cole Memorandum:

 

ensure that its operations are compliant with all licensing requirements as established by the applicable state, county, municipality, town, township, borough, and other political/administrative divisions;
ensure that its cannabis related activities adhere to the scope of the licensing obtained (for example: in the states where cannabis is permitted only for adult-use, the products are only sold to individuals who meet the requisite age requirements);
implement policies and procedures to ensure that cannabis products are not distributed to minors;
implement policies and procedures in place to ensure that funds are not distributed to criminal enterprises, gangs or cartels;
implement an inventory tracking system and necessary procedures to ensure that such compliance system is effective in tracking inventory and preventing diversion of cannabis or cannabis products into those states where cannabis is not permitted by state law, or cross any state lines in general;

 

83

 

 

ensure that its state-authorized cannabis business activity is not used as a cover or pretense for trafficking of other illegal drugs, and is not engaged in any other illegal activity, or any activities that are contrary to any applicable anti-money laundering statutes; and
ensure that its products comply with applicable regulations and contain necessary disclaimers about the contents of the products to prevent adverse public health consequences from cannabis use and prevent impaired driving.

 

In addition, the Company may (and frequently does) conduct background checks to ensure that the principals and management of its operating subsidiaries are of good character, and have not been involved with other illegal drugs, engaged in illegal activity or activities involving violence, or use of firearms in cultivation, manufacturing or distribution of cannabis. The Company will also conduct ongoing reviews of the activities of its cannabis businesses, the premises on which they operate and the policies and procedures that are related to possession of cannabis or cannabis products outside of the licensed premises, including the cases where such possession is permitted by regulation. See “Risk Factors.”

 

The Cole Memorandum and the Rohrabacher/Blumenauer Amendment gave medical cannabis operators and investors in states with legal regimes greater certainty regarding federal enforcement as to establish cannabis businesses in those states. Nonetheless, there is no guarantee that state laws legalizing and regulating the sale and use of cannabis will not be repealed or overturned, or that local governmental authorities will not limit the applicability of state laws within their respective jurisdictions. Unless and until the United States Congress amends the CSA with respect to cannabis (and as to the timing or scope of any such potential amendments there can be no assurance), there is a risk that federal authorities may enforce current U.S. federal law.

 

Despite the expanding market for legal cannabis, traditional sources of financing, including bank lending or private equity capital, are lacking which can be attributable to the fact that cannabis remains a Schedule I substance under the CSA. These traditional sources of financing are expected to remain scarce unless and until the federal government legalizes cannabis cultivation and sales.

 

Pursuant to Staff Notice 51-352, issuers with U.S. cannabis-related activities are expected to clearly and prominently disclose certain prescribed information in prospectus filings and other required disclosure documents. In accordance with the Staff Notice 51-352, below is a table of concordance that is intended to assist readers in identifying those parts of this prospectus that address the disclosure expectations outlined in Staff Notice 51-352.

 

84

 

 

Industry Involvement Specific Disclosure Necessary to Fairly Present all Material Facts, Risks and Uncertainties Annual Report Cross Reference
All Issuers with U.S. Marijuana-Related Activities Describe the nature of the Company’s involvement in the U.S. marijuana industry and include the disclosures indicated for at least one of the direct, indirect and ancillary industry involvement types noted in this table.

“Description of the Business”

 

“Regulatory Overview”

 

Prominently state that marijuana is illegal under U.S. federal law and that enforcement of relevant laws is a significant risk. “Regulatory Overview - United States Federal Overview”
“Risk Factors - Risks Related to the United States Regulatory System - The Company’s business activities, while compliant with applicable state and local U.S. law, are illegal under U.S. federal law”
Discuss any statements and other available guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in any jurisdiction where the Company conducts U.S. marijuana-related activities.

“Regulatory Overview - United States Federal Overview”

 

“Risk Factors - Risks Related to Regulatory Matters - The Company’s Business Activities are Illegal under U.S. Federal Law”

 

“Risk Factors - Risks Related to Regulatory Matters - U.S. State Regulatory Uncertainty”

 

Outline related risks including, among others, the risk that third-party service providers could suspend or withdraw services and the risk that regulatory bodies could impose certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to operate in the U.S.

“Risk Factors - Risks Related to Regulatory Matters - The Company’s Business Activities are Illegal under U.S. Federal Law”

 

“Risk Factors - Risks Generally Related to the Company - Service Providers”

 

Given the illegality of marijuana under U.S. federal law, discuss the Company’s ability to access both public and private capital and indicate what financing options are / are not available in order to support continuing operations. “Risk Factors - Risks Generally Related to the Company - Ability to Access Public and Private Capital”
Quantify the Company’s balance sheet and operating statement exposure to U.S. marijuana-related activities. At the date of this Prospectus, 100% of the Company’s operations are in the United States.
Disclose if legal advice has not been obtained, either in the form of a legal opinion or otherwise, regarding (a) compliance with applicable state regulatory frameworks and (b) potential exposure and implications arising from U.S. federal law. The Company and its subsidiaries have obtained legal advice regarding (a) compliance with applicable state regulatory frameworks, and (b) potential exposure and implications arising from U.S. federal law.

 

85

 

 

Industry Involvement Specific Disclosure Necessary to Fairly Present all Material Facts, Risks and Uncertainties Annual Report Cross Reference
U.S. Marijuana Issuers with direct involvement in cultivation or distribution Outline the regulations for U.S. states in which the Company operates and confirm how the Company complies with applicable licensing requirements and the regulatory framework enacted by the applicable U.S. state.

“Description of the Business”

 

“Regulatory Overview - State-Level Overview & Compliance Summary”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - California”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Connecticut”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Florida”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Illinois”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Maine”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Massachusetts”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Michigan”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - New Hampshire”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - New Jersey”

 

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - New York”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Ohio”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Oregon”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Pennsylvania”

 

Discuss the Company’s program for monitoring compliance with U.S. state law on an ongoing basis, outline internal compliance procedures and provide a positive statement indicating that the Company is in compliance with U.S. state law and the related licensing framework. Promptly disclose any non-compliance, citations or notices of violation which may have an impact on the Company’s license, business activities or operations. “Regulatory Overview - State-Level Overview & Compliance Summary”

 

86

 

 

Industry Involvement Specific Disclosure Necessary to Fairly Present all Material Facts, Risks and Uncertainties Annual Report Cross Reference
U.S. Marijuana Issuers with indirect involvement in cultivation or distribution Outline the regulations for U.S. states in which the Company’s investee(s) operate.

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - California”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Maine”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Massachusetts”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - New Jersey”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Ohio”

 

Provide reasonable assurance, through either positive or negative statements, that the investee’s business is in compliance with applicable licensing requirements and the regulatory framework enacted by the applicable U.S. state. Promptly disclose any non-compliance, citations or notices of violation, of which the Company is aware, that may have an impact on the investee’s license, business activities or operations.

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - California”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Maine”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Massachusetts”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - New Jersey”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Ohio”

 

 

 

U.S. Marijuana Issuers with material ancillary involvement Provide reasonable assurance, through either positive or negative statements, that the applicable customer’s or investee’s business is in compliance with applicable licensing requirements and the regulatory framework enacted by the applicable U.S. state.

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Maine”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Massachusetts”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - New Jersey”

 

“Regulatory Overview - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level - Ohio”

 

 

 

 

In accordance with Staff Notice 51-352, the Company will evaluate, monitor and reassess the foregoing disclosure, and any related risks, on an ongoing basis and any supplements or amendments hereto will be reflected in, and provided to, investors in public filings of the Company, including in the event of government policy changes or the introduction of new or amended guidance, laws or regulations regarding cannabis regulation. Any non-compliance, citations or notices of violation which may have a material impact on any subsidiary’s licenses, business activities or operations will be promptly disclosed by the Company.

 

The following chart sets out, for each of the subsidiaries and other entities through which the Company conducts its operations, the U.S. state(s) in which it operates, the nature of its operations (adult-use/medicinal), whether such activities carried on are direct, indirect or ancillary in nature (as such terms are defined in Staff Notice 51-352), the number of sales, cultivation and other licenses held by such entity and whether such entity has any operational cultivation or processing facilities.

 

87

 

 

State Entity Adult-Use / Medicinal Direct / Indirect / Ancillary Dispensary Licenses Cultivation / Processing / Distribution License Operational Dispensaries Operational Cultivation / Processing Facilities
California CWG Botanicals, Inc.1, 2,4 Adult-Use / Medicinal Ancillary 3 1
Kanna, Inc. Adult-Use / Medicinal Direct 1
Gravenstein Foods LLC3 Adult-Use / Medicinal Direct 1
Connecticut D&B Wellness, LLC Medicinal Direct 1 1
Prime Wellness of Connecticut, LLC Medicinal Direct 1 1
Thames Valley Apothecary, LLC Medicinal Direct 1 1

Florida5

 

 

Acreage Florida, Inc. Medicinal Direct 1 1 1 1
Illinois In Grown Farms LLC1 Adult-Use / Medicinal Direct 1 1
NCC LLC Adult-Use / Medicinal Direct 1 1
NCC 2 LLC Adult-Use Direct 1 1
Maine Wellness Connection of Maine1 Medicinal Ancillary 3 1 3 1
NPG LLC Adult-Use Direct 1 1
Massachusetts The Botanist, Inc. Medicinal Direct 3 1 2 1
Michigan N/A Medicinal Direct 3
New Hampshire1 Prime Alternative Treatment Centers of NH, Inc. Medicinal Ancillary 2 1 1 1
New Jersey Compassionate Care Foundation, Inc. Medicinal Direct 3 1 2 1
New York NYCANNA, LLC Medicinal Direct 4 1 4 1
Ohio Greenleaf Apothecaries, LLC1 Medicinal Ancillary 5 5
Greenleaf Therapeutics, LLC1 Medicinal Ancillary 1
Greenleaf Gardens, LLC1 Medicinal Ancillary 1 1
Oregon High Street Oregon, LLC Adult-Use Direct 2 1 2
22nd & Burn, Inc. Adult-Use Direct 1 1
The Firestation 23, Inc. Adult-Use Direct 1 1
East 11th, Inc. Adult-Use Direct 1 1
Gesundheit Foods LLC4 Adult-Use Direct 2
Pennsylvania Prime Wellness of Pennsylvania, LLC Medicinal Direct 1 1

 

88

 

 

Notes:

 

(1) Acreage provides goods and/or services including but not limited to financing, management, consulting and/or administrative services with these license holders to assist in the operations of their cannabis businesses.
(2) Separate grow/process licenses.
(3) A distribution license has been issued in this U.S. state.
(4) Acreage has entered into an agreement to acquire CWG. The acquisition remains subject to regulatory approval.
(5) On February 25, 2020, we entered into an agreement to sell all of our operations in Florida for an aggregate purchase price of $60.0 million. The sale is expected to close during the second quarter of 2021 subject to customary closing conditions including the procurement of all necessary approvals for the transfer to the purchaser of the Florida license for the operation of the medical marijuana businesses.

 

The above-noted licenses have been entered into in the ordinary course of business. The Company is not substantially dependent on any one such license and, as such, does not consider such licenses as material contracts.

 

State-Level Overview & Compliance Summary

 

While the Company and High Street are in compliance with the rules, regulations and license requirements governing each state in which the subsidiaries and contractual parties operate, there are significant risks associated with their business and the business of the subsidiaries and contractual parties. Further, the rules and regulations as outlined below are not a full complement of all the rules that the subsidiaries are required to follow in each applicable state.

 

Although each state has its own laws and regulations regarding the operation of cannabis businesses, certain of the laws and regulations are consistent across jurisdictions. As a general matter, to operate legally under state law, cannabis operators must obtain a license from the state and in certain states must also obtain local approval. In those states where local approval is required, local authorization is a prerequisite to obtaining state licenses, and local governments are permitted to prohibit or otherwise regulate the types and number of cannabis businesses allowed in their locality. The license application and license renewal processes are unique to each state. However, each state’s application process requires a comprehensive criminal history, regulatory history, financial and personal disclosures, coupled with stringent monitoring and continuous reporting requirements designed to ensure only good actors are granted licenses and that licensees continue to operate in compliance with the state regulatory program.

 

License applicants for each state must submit standard operating procedures describing how the operator will, among other requirements, secure the facility, manage inventory, comply with the state’s seed-to-sale tracking requirements, dispense cannabis, and handle waste, as applicable to the license sought. Once the standard operating procedures are determined compliant and approved by the applicable state regulatory agency, the licensee is required to abide by the processes described and seek regulatory agency approval before any changes to such procedures may be made. Licensees are additionally required to train their employees on compliant operations and are only permitted to transact with other legal and licensed businesses.

 

As a condition of each state’s licensure, operators must consent to inspections of the commercial cannabis facility as well as the facility’s books and records to monitor and enforce compliance with state law. Many localities have also enacted similar standards for inspections and have already commenced both site-visits and compliance inspections for operators who have received state temporary or annual licensure.

 

To strengthen the communication and transparency between High Street and its subsidiaries, High Street and its subsidiaries utilize a third-party enterprise compliance platform, which facilitates a regulatory document control workflow for each state and can issue alerts for time sensitive information requests for events such as license renewal or an impending inspection. The software features a robust auditing system that allows for both internal as well as third-party compliance auditing, covering all state, municipal, facility and operational requirements. The third-party software facilitates the implementation and maintenance of compliant operations and can track all required licensing maintenance criteria, which includes countdown features and automatically generated reminders for initiating renewals and required reporting. Though the Company and High Street strive to comply with all aspects of the required state regulations, they believe that the core to ensuring a comprehensive compliance program is to weigh the risk of each regulation and ensure on a regular basis that the operators are properly controlling these risks.

 

89

 

 

Acreage monitors the applicable rules and regulations of each state in which it has, indirectly through its subsidiaries, licenses, permits, or operations. Acreage maintains a database and tracks each license or permit held by its subsidiaries, showing the renewal date, inspection schedules, and the results of any regulatory inspection reports. Acreage enhances its compliance program through subscription to a web-based service that provides access to cannabis-related state, county, municipal and federal rules and regulations which organizes the laws into distinct categories (such as taxation, zoning, application and licensing, and packaging and labeling) and sorts them by license type (such as cultivation, dispensary and testing). Acreage will also monitor any action taken by its subsidiaries in response to a change of governing regulations or suggestions from regulators.

 

Acreage’s legal compliance team continually monitors and reviews correspondence and changes to, and updates of, rules or regulatory policies impacting Acreage and the operation of the businesses carried on by its subsidiaries in each U.S. state in which it has operations. Acreage has employed an experienced team of legal and compliance professionals with expertise in regulatory and corporate compliance to oversee its activities. The team led by the Company’s General Counsel, includes a former Assistant U.S. Attorney; a former SEC enforcement attorney and experienced compliance professional; and three experienced corporate attorneys and one paralegal. Acreage has a Director of Operational Compliance who oversees a team that focuses on state-by-state operational compliance issues. Acreage’s legal compliance team has implemented internal policies and procedures at corporate and subsidiary levels designed to mitigate any lapses in its overall infrastructure and facilitate compliance with relevant laws and regulations. Acreage strives to ensure its overall operations are in compliance with U.S. state law and the related licensing framework (see “Regulatory Framework - The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level). Marijuana remains a Schedule I controlled substance in the U.S. and therefore federally illegal. Acreage has not received any non-compliance citations or notices of violation which may have a material impact on its licenses, business activities or operations.

 

Acreage is classified as having a “direct,” “indirect” and “ancillary” involvement in the United States cannabis industry and it, each of its subsidiaries and, to the best of its knowledge, each entity through which it has ancillary involvement in the United States cannabis industry, is in compliance with applicable United States state law and related licensing requirements and the regulatory framework enacted by each of the states in which it has operations. The Company is not subject to any citations or notices of violation with applicable licensing requirements and the regulatory frameworks which may have a material impact on its licenses, business activities or operations. The Company uses reasonable commercial efforts to ensure that its business is in compliance with applicable licensing requirements and the regulatory frameworks enacted by each state, through the advice of its Director of Legal Compliance, and its Director of Compliance, who monitor and review its business practices and changes to U.S. federal and state enforcement priorities and rules. The Company’s General Counsel and his legal team work with external legal counsel to ensure that the Company is in on-going compliance with applicable state law. These advisors have provided legal advice to the subsidiaries regarding, among other things, (a) compliance with applicable state regulatory frameworks, and (b) potential exposure and implications arising from U.S. federal law. In addition, the Company has designated individuals with responsibility for overseeing day-to-day compliance at each facility in which the Company maintains operational control.

 

The Company will continue to use reasonable commercial efforts to ensure it is in compliance with applicable licensing requirements and the regulatory framework enacted in states where it conducts business by continuous review of its licenses and affirmation certifications from management. The Company has engaged state and local regulatory/compliance counsel engaged in jurisdictions in which it operates.

 

The Company has a commitment to training its personnel on the relevant issues in order to facilitate its overall compliance effort. The Company’s training program includes, among other items, the following topics:

 

importance of compliance with state and local laws
dispensing procedures
patient privacy
security and safety policies and procedures
inventory control
quality control
cash management and control
transportation procedures

 

The Company’s training program emphasizes security and inventory control to ensure strict monitoring of cannabis and inventory from delivery to sale or disposal. Only authorized, properly trained employees are allowed to access the Company’s computerized seed- to-sale system. All of the Company’s facilities are monitored 24-hours a day, seven days a week. Visitors to the facilities are only permitted in strict accordance with relevant state laws and appropriately monitored and logged in.

 

The Company’s compliance team closely monitors and promptly addresses all compliance notifications from the regulators and inspectors in each market, in an effort to resolve any issues identified on a timely basis. The Company keeps records of all compliance notifications received from the state regulators or inspectors and how and when the issue was resolved.

 

90

 

 

Further, the Company has created comprehensive standard operating procedures that include detailed descriptions and instructions for receiving shipments of inventory, inventory tracking, recordkeeping and record retention practices related to inventory, as well as procedures for performing inventory reconciliation and ensuring the accuracy of inventory tracking and recordkeeping. The Company maintains records of its inventory at all licensed facilities. Adherence to the Company’s standard operating procedures is mandatory and ensures that the Company’s operations are compliant with the rules set forth by the applicable state and local laws, regulations, ordinances, licenses and other requirements. The Company ensures adherence to standard operating procedures by regularly conducting internal inspections and is committed to ensuring any issues identified are resolved quickly and thoroughly.

 

In order to comply with industry best practices, despite the rescission of the Cole Memorandum, the Company continues to do the following to ensure compliance with the guidance provided by the Cole Memorandum:

 

Ensure the operations are compliant with all licensing requirements that are set forth with regards to cannabis operation by the applicable state, county, municipality, town, township, borough, and other political/administrative divisions. To this end, the Company uses its internal Legal Department including its Legal Compliance team and retains appropriately experienced legal counsel to conduct the necessary due diligence to ensure compliance of such operations with all applicable regulations;
The activities relating to cannabis business adhere to the scope of the licensing obtained. For example, in Florida only medical cannabis is permitted and therefore the products are only sold to patients who have the appropriate recommendation in the state registry and have a valid state-issued medical identification card;
The Company only works through licensed operators, which must pass a range of requirements, adhere to strict business practice standards and be subjected to strict regulatory oversight whereby sufficient checks and balances ensure that no revenue is distributed to criminal enterprises, gangs and cartels; and
The Company conducts reviews of products and product packaging to ensure that the products comply with applicable regulations and contain necessary disclaimers about the contents of the products to prevent adverse public health consequences from cannabis use and prevent impaired driving.

 

The Company will continue to monitor compliance on an ongoing basis in accordance with its compliance program and standard operating procedures. While the Company’s operations strive to be in compliance with all applicable state laws, regulations and licensing requirements, some of such activities remain illegal under United States federal law. For the reasons described above and the risks further described in Risk Factors below, there are significant risks associated with the business of the Company. See “Risk Factors”.

 

The Regulatory Landscape on a U.S. State Level

 

California

 

California Legislative History

 

In 1996, California voters passed Proposition 215, the Compassionate Use Act allowing physicians to legally recommend medical cannabis for patients who would benefit from cannabis. The Compassionate Use Act legalized the use, possession and cultivation of medical cannabis for a set of qualifying conditions including AIDS, anorexia, arthritis, cachexia, cancer and chronic pain. The law established a not-for-profit patient/caregiver system but there was no state licensing authority to oversee the businesses that emerged as a result.

 

In September 2015, the California legislature passed three bills, collectively known as the “Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act”. The Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act established a licensing and regulatory framework for the medical cannabis businesses in California. Multiple agencies oversee different aspects of the program and require businesses obtain a state license and local approval to operate.

 

In November 2016, voters in California passed Proposition 64, the Adult Use of Marijuana Act (“AUMA”) creating an adult-use cannabis program for individuals 21 years of age or older. AUMA contained conflicting provisions with the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act. Consequently, in June 2017, the California State Legislature passed Senate Bill No. 94, known as the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (“MAUCRSA”), which combined the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act and AUMA to provide a set of regulations to govern medical and adult-use licensing regime for cannabis businesses. The three agencies that regulate cannabis at the state level are: (a) the California Department of Food and Agriculture, via CalCannabis, which issues licenses to cannabis cultivators; (b) the California Department of Public Health, via the Manufactured Cannabis Safety Branch, which issues licenses to cannabis manufacturers; and (c) the California Department of Consumer Affairs, via the Bureau of Cannabis Control, which issues licenses to cannabis distributors, testing laboratories, retailers, and micro-businesses. These agencies also oversee the various aspects of implementing and maintaining California’s cannabis landscape, including the statewide track and trace system.

 

91

 

 

To legally operate a medical or adult-use cannabis business in California, the operator must have both local approval and a state license. This requires license holders to operate in cities with cannabis licensing and approval programs. Municipalities in California are authorized to determine the number of licenses they will issue to cannabis operators, or can choose to outright ban the cultivation, manufacturing or the retail sale of cannabis. MAUCRSA went into effect on January 1, 2018.

 

On May 18, 2018, the California Department of Consumer Affairs, the California Department of Public Health and the California Department of Food and Agriculture proposed to re-adopt their emergency cannabis regulations. The three licensing authorities proposed changes to the regulatory provisions to provide greater clarity to licensees and to address issues that have arisen since the emergency regulations went into effect in December 2017. Highlighted among the changes are that applicants may now complete one license application which will allow for both medical and adult-use cannabis activity. These emergency cannabis regulations were officially readopted on June 4, 2018 and came into effect on June 6, 2018. On January 16, 2019, California’s three state cannabis licensing authorities announced that the Office of Administrative Law officially approved state regulations for cannabis businesses. The final cannabis regulations took effect immediately and superseded the previous emergency regulations.

 

California Licenses

 

Although vertical integration across multiple license types is allowed under the state regulations, it is not required. CWG Botanicals, Inc. (“CWG”) holds three licenses in California and has received local approval to operate under such licenses. HSRC NorCal, LLC (“HSRC”), a subsidiary of the Company, has entered into a management or consulting services agreement with CWG but does not own or control CWG at this time. CWG holds cultivation/grow, manufacturing and distribution licenses. The manufacturing license is denoted as a Type 7 which provides CWG the authorization to manufacture cannabis products using volatile solvent as well as non-volatile extraction methods. Each license issued gives CWG the ability to operate as a medical and adult-use provider. Gravenstein Foods LLC (“Gravenstein”), a subsidiary of Form Factory, holds a temporary manufacturing license. The manufacturing license is denoted as a Type 6 which provides Gravenstein the authorization to manufacture cannabis products using only non-volatile extraction methods. On July 15, 2019, Kanna, Inc. (“Kanna”), a subsidiary of the Company, was awarded an Adult-Use and Medicinal - Retailer Provisional License, which allows Kanna to open a dispensary and was awarded an Adult-Use and Medicinal - Retailer Provisional License, which allows Kanna to open a dispensary.

 

California License Types

 

Once an operator obtains local approval, the operator must obtain state licenses before conducting any commercial marijuana activity. There are 12 different license types that cover all commercial activity. License types 1-3 authorize the cultivation of medical and/or adult-use marijuana plants. Type 4 licenses are for nurseries that cultivate and sell clones and “teens” (immature marijuana plants that have established roots but require further vegetation prior to being sent into the flowering period). Type 6 and 7 licenses authorize manufacturers to process marijuana biomass into certain value-added products such as shatter or marijuana distillate oil with the use of volatile or non-volatile solvents, depending on the license type. Type 8 licenses are held by testing facilities who test samples of marijuana products and generate “certificates of analysis,” which include important information regarding the potency of products and whether products have passed or failed certain threshold tests for pesticide and microbiological contamination. Type 9 licenses are issued to “non-storefront” retailers, commonly called delivery services, who bring marijuana products directly to customers and patients at their residences or other chosen delivery location. Type 10 licenses are issued to storefront retailers, or dispensaries, which are open to the public and sell marijuana products onsite. Type 11 licenses are known as “Transport-Only” distribution licenses, and they allow the distributor to transport marijuana and marijuana products between licensees, but not to retailers. Type 12 licenses are issued to distributors who move marijuana and marijuana products to all license types, including retailers.

 

The below table lists the licenses issued to CWG, Gravenstein, and Kanna, Inc.:

 

Subsidiary License Number City Expiration Date Description
CWG Botanicals, Inc. CCL18-0000104 Oakland 4/17/2021 Grow
CWG Botanicals, Inc. CDPH- 10002775 Oakland 4/24/2021 Manufacturing
CWG Botanicals, Inc. C11-0000434-LIC Oakland 6/19/2021 Distribution
Gravenstein Foods LLC CDPH-10003051 Oakland 5/1/2021 Manufacturing
Kanna, Inc. C10-0000419-LIC Oakland 7/14/2021 Retailer

 

92

 

 

In September 2018, the Governor of California approved the Senate Bill 1459 (“SB-1459”). SB-1459 created a new scheme of provisional licenses for cannabis operators. This provisional licensing scheme was essentially intended to replace the temporary licensing scheme. SB-1459 was necessary because the three main state cannabis licensing agencies - the Bureau of Cannabis Control (“BCC”), California Department of Public Health (“CDPH”), and California Department of Food and Agriculture (“CDFA”) - and localities which issue permits to cannabis operators, were all backlogged with numerous applications and couldn’t process all of the applications in time for applicants to get operational in 2018. The steps, per SB-1459 to obtain a provisional license are as follows: (1) an applicant must hold or previously have held a temporary license for the same commercial cannabis activity for which it seeks a provisional, and (2) the applicant must submit a completed annual license application and proof that California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) compliance is underway. Provisional licenses last for 12 months and can be issued through the end of 2019. The measure was intended to give local agencies more time to do a CEQA review and contained a sunset date of January 1, 2020.

 

Despite the efforts of SB 1459, a large backlog of cannabis applications has persisted. In a continuing effort to alleviate this problem the Legislature followed up SB 1459 recently with the passage of SB 97/AB 97, the 2019 Cannabis Trailer Bill. The 2019 Cannabis Trailer Bill extends the ability of state licensing agencies to issue provisional permits to qualified applicants from January 1, 2020 to January 1, 2022. In addition, the measure extended the provisions from SB 94 that provided a CEQA exemption for local governments from July 1, 2019 to July 1, 2021.

 

Currently CWG holds one provisional license for distribution, one provisional license for manufacturing and one provisional license for cultivation. Gravenstein holds one provisional manufacturing license. Kanna holds a provisional license for a dispensary. Gravenstein and Kanna are currently not operational. Those license holders which have a provisional or annual license, must be compliant with METRC 30 days after receiving their licenses. An application for renewal of a cultivation license shall be submitted to the state at least 30 calendar days prior to the expiration date of the current license. A license holder that does not submit a completed license renewal application to the state within 30 calendar days after the expiration of the current license forfeits their eligibility to apply for a license renewal and, instead, would be required to submit a new license application. The license holders must ensure that no cannabis may be sold, delivered, transported or distributed by a producer from or to a location outside of the state.

 

Retail Compliance in California

 

California requires that certain warnings, images, and content information be printed on all marijuana packaging. BCC regulations also include certain requirements about tamper-evident and child-resistant packaging. Distributors and retailers are responsible for confirming that products are properly labeled and packaged before they are sold to a customer.

 

Consumers aged 21 and up may purchase marijuana in California from a dispensary with an “adult-use” license. Some localities still only allow medicinal dispensaries. Consumers aged 18 and up with a valid physician’s recommendation may purchase marijuana from a medicinal-only dispensary or an adult-use dispensary. Consumers without valid physician’s recommendations may not purchase marijuana from a medicinal-only dispensary. All marijuana businesses are prohibited from hiring employees under the age of 21.

 

California Record-keeping/Reporting

 

California has selected METRC as the T&T system used to track commercial cannabis activity. CWG uses a third-party platform, QuantumLeap, which feeds data to METRC to meet all reporting requirements.

 

Licensees are required to maintain records for at least seven years from the date a record is created. These records include: (a) a cultivation plan, (b) all supporting documentation for data or information input into the T&T system, (c) all unique identifiers (“UID”) assigned to product in inventory and all unassigned UIDs, (d) financial records related to the licensed commercial cannabis activity, including bank statements, tax records, sales invoices and receipts, and records of transport and transfer to other licensed facilities, (e) records related to employee training for the T&T system, and (f) permits, licenses, and other local authorizations to conduct the licensee’s commercial cannabis activity.

 

California Inventory/Storage

 

Each licensee is required to assign an account manager to oversee the T&T system. The account manager is fully trained on the system and is accountable to record all commercial cannabis activities accurately and completely. The licensee is expected to correct any data that is entered into the T&T system in error within three business days of discovery of the error.

 

93

 

 

The licensee is required to report information in the T&T system for each transfer of cannabis or non-manufactured cannabis products to, or cannabis or non-manufactured cannabis products received from, other licensed operators. Licensees must use the T&T system for all inventory tracking activities at a licensed premise, including, but not limited to, reconciling all on-premise and in-transit cannabis or non-manufactured cannabis product inventories at least once every 14 business days. The licensee must store cannabis and cannabis products in a secure place with locked doors.

 

California Security

 

A licensee is required to maintain an alarm system capable of detecting and signaling the presence of a threat requiring urgent attention and to which law enforcement are expected to respond. A licensee must also ensure a professionally qualified alarm company operator or one of its registered alarm agents installs, maintains, monitors, and responds to the alarm system.

 

The manufacturing and cultivation of cannabis must use a digital video surveillance system which runs 24 hours a day, seven days a week and effectively and clearly records images of the area under surveillance. Each camera must be placed in a location that clearly records activity occurring within 20 feet of all points of entry and exit on the licensed premises. The areas that will be recorded on the video surveillance system should include the following: (a) areas where cannabis goods are weighed, packed, stored, loaded, and unloaded for transportation, prepared, or moved within the premises, (b) limited-access areas, (c) security rooms, and (d) areas storing a surveillance-system storage device with at least one camera recording the access points to the secured surveillance recording area. Surveillance recordings must be kept for a minimum of 90 days.

 

California Transportation

 

Transporting cannabis goods between licensees and a licensed facility may only be performed by persons holding a distributor license. The vehicle or trailer used must not contain any markings or features on the exterior which may indicate or identify the contents or purpose. All cannabis products must be locked in a box, container, or cage that is secured to the inside of the vehicle or trailer. When left unattended, vehicles must be locked and secured. At a minimum, the vehicle must be equipped with an alarm system, motion detectors, pressure switches, duress, panic, and hold-up alarms.

 

California Inspections

 

All licensees are subject to annual and random inspections of their premises. Cultivators may be inspected by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the California Regional Water Quality Control Boards, and the California Department of Food and Agriculture. Manufacturers are subject to inspection by the California Department of Public Health, and Retailers, Distributors, Testing Laboratories, and Delivery services are subject to inspection by the Bureau of Cannabis Control. Inspections can result in notices to correct, or notices of violation, fines, or other disciplinary action by the inspecting agency.

 

Marijuana Taxes in California

 

Several types of taxes are imposed in California for adult-use sale. As of January 1, 2020, the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration raised the tax rate on wholesale cannabis from 60% to 80%. Cultivators have the choice of being taxed at $9.65, per dry-weight ounce of cannabis flowers or $1.35 per ounce of wet-weight plants. Further, cultivators are required to pay $2.87 per ounce for fresh frozen biomass. California also imposes an excise tax of 15%. Cities and counties apply their sales tax along with the state’s excise and many cities and counties have also authorized the imposition of special cannabis business taxes which can range from 2% to 10% of gross receipts of the business. The Company has retained legal counsel and/or other advisors in connection with California’s marijuana regulatory program. The Company has developed standard operating procedures for licenses who are operational.

 

U.S. Attorney Statements in California

 

To the knowledge of management of the Company, other than as disclosed in this Prospectus, there have not been any statements or guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in California.

 

Connecticut

 

Connecticut Legislative History

 

Connecticut’s Medical Marijuana Program (the “CT Program”) was enacted on June 1, 2012 with the signing into law of Act 12-55, the Act Concerning the Palliative Use of Marijuana (the “CT Act”). The CT Program protects patients and caregivers who hold valid medical cannabis registration cards from prosecution for possession of cannabis obtained from licensed dispensaries. Patients are eligible for a medical cannabis registration card if they have a qualifying debilitating medical condition, obtain a medical cannabis recommendation from a CT Program registered physician, and register as a qualified patient through the CT Program. In August 2018, the list of qualifying debilitating medical conditions was raised from 22 to 31 adding among other conditions, muscular dystrophy, chronic neuropathic pain and severe rheumatoid arthritis to the list which already included, among others, cancer, HIV/AIDS, Parkinson’s disease, and Multiple Sclerosis. In 2019, the list of qualifying conditions was expanded from 31 to 36 adding among other conditions, Tourette syndrome and intractable neuropathic pain that is unresponsive to standard medical treatments. Caregivers may register with the CT Program if they are designated by a qualifying patient, receive certification from a registered physician, and pass a criminal background check. The good standing of patients, caregivers, and physicians under the CT Program is subject to timely reporting and annual renewal requirements.

 

94

 

 

In April 2014, Connecticut’s Department of Consumer Protection (the “CT DCP”) initially approved six dispensary licenses. In January 2016, the CT DCP approved three additional dispensaries and in December 2018 the CT DCP approved nine additional dispensaries bringing the total to 18. Connecticut began accepting written certifications from physicians to qualify patients on October 1, 2012. As of May 24, 2020, there were approximately 41,203 patients certified to obtain cannabis through the CT Program.

 

Connecticut Licenses

 

The CT DCP is responsible for the CT Program and is authorized to issue dispensary and producer/grower licenses. As of January 31, 2021, there were 50,034 patients with an approved medical ID card, Currently, the CT DCP has issued 18 dispensary and four producer/grower licenses. Three of the 18 dispensary licenses have been issued to our subsidiary.

 

The table below lists the licenses issued to the Company’s indirect subsidiaries operating in Connecticut:

 

Subsidiary License number City Expiration
Date
Description
D&B Wellness, LLC MMDF.0000003 Bethel 5/13/2021 Dispensary Facility
Prime Wellness of Connecticut, LLC MMDF.0000004 South Windsor 4/10/2021 Dispensary Facility
Thames Valley Apothecary, LLC MMDF.0000005 Uncasville 4/15/2021 Dispensary Facility

 

Each license qualifies a dispensary to purchase medical cannabis in good faith from licensed medical cannabis producers and to dispense cannabis to qualifying patients or primary caregivers that are registered under the CT Program. Dispensary license holders are required to ensure that no cannabis is sold, delivered, transported, or distributed to a location outside of Connecticut. Under the CT Program, dispensary licenses are renewed annually. Renewal applications must be submitted 45 days prior to license expiration and any renewal submitted more than 30 days after expiration will not be renewed.

 

Connecticut Record-keeping/Reporting

 

Connecticut does not mandate use of any singular unified T&T system by which all dispensary license holders submit data directly to the state. Acreage’s license holders, D&B Wellness, LLC, d/b/a Compassionate Care Center of Connecticut, and Prime Wellness of Connecticut, LLC, use a third-party solution, THC BioTrack, to push data to the state in order to meet all reporting requirements. Thames Valley Apothecary, LLC (“Thames Valley”) uses Leaf Logix Technology as their third-party solution.

 

The CT Program provides strict guidelines for reporting via the license holder’s third-party T&T system. Every cannabis sale must be documented at the point of sale including recording the date and purchaser’s signature. At least once per day, all sales must be uploaded via the T&T system to the Connecticut Prescription Monitoring Program which accumulates and tracks medical cannabis purchases across all Connecticut dispensaries. The CT Program requires that records are kept for a minimum of three years.

 

95

 

 

Connecticut Inventory

 

Upon receipt of a cannabis product, each product must be cataloged and entered in the dispensary’s T&T system. The information required by the CT Program includes the quantity of product received, its lot number, expiration date, and strain. Only registered dispensary pharmacists may accept delivery of cannabis and related products. A delivery receipt for cannabis and cannabis products must be signed by the accepting dispensary pharmacist and be attached to the delivery manifest. Each delivery manifest must be kept on file for three years. Once per week, a count of cannabis product stock is to be conducted by a dispensary pharmacist which includes tracking the producer’s name, type and quantity of cannabis, and a summary of inventory findings. Any discrepancies must be rectified and documented. Any unrectified discrepancy must be disclosed to the dispensary manager who, if necessary, will notify the CT DCP. Annual controlled substance inventories are required to be conducted on a date specified by the dispensary manager and to be kept on file for three years.

 

Connecticut Storage/Security

 

The CT Program requires that dispensaries adhere to strict cannabis storage and security guidelines to maintain control against diversion, theft, and loss of cannabis or cannabis products. Each dispensary is required to (a) establish a security plan including approved safes for storage of all cannabis products, (b) maintain daily supplies of product in locked cabinets, (c) install safes accessible only to the dispensary pharmacist or manager, (d) utilize commercial grade motion detectors and video cameras in all areas that contain cannabis, and (e) install cameras directed at all safes, vaults, dispensing and sale areas, or any other area where cannabis is stored or handled.

 

Furthermore, the CT Act prescribes that dispensaries must retain and present all video upon request of the CT DCP. Specifically, dispensaries must (a) make the latest 24 hours of video readily available for immediate viewing upon request of a state authorized representative, and (b) retain all videos for at least 30 calendar days. Additionally, dispensaries must install strategically placed duress and panic alarms, both silent and audible, that trigger a law enforcement response. Employees are also required to wear panic alarm buttons for an additional level of safety and security.

 

Connecticut Training & Education

 

All dispensary staff pharmacists must go through a training program on cannabis and cannabis products. Such training must include covering the chemical components of cannabis and use of ancillary cannabis delivery devices. Pharmacist training should prepare pharmacists how to best assess the needs of qualified patients during required new-patient private consultations. During such consultations, pharmacists are required to educate new patients on their qualified debilitating medical condition, allergies, medication profile, cannabis use, and cannabis delivery methods. Pharmacists have sole responsibility to recommend products based on the patients’ individual needs.

 

Like dispensary staff pharmacists, dispensary technicians and employees also must meet training guidelines as set forth by the CT Program. Dispensary technicians must be trained on professional conduct, ethics, patient confidentiality, and developments in the field of medical cannabis use, among other pertinent topics commensurate with the technician’s professional responsibilities. Dispensary employees, among other things, must be trained on the proper use of security measures and controls, procedures for responding to an emergency, and patient confidentiality. A record of all staff training and patient education must be maintained and made available for review at the request of the DPH.

 

Connecticut Inspections

 

For the purposes of supervision and enforcement of the CT Program, the Connecticut Commissioner of Consumer Protection is authorized to (i) enter, at reasonable times, any place, including a vehicle, in which marijuana is held, dispensed, sold, produced, delivered, transported, manufactured or otherwise disposed of, (ii) inspect within reasonable limits and in a reasonable manner, such place and all pertinent equipment, finished and unfinished material, containers and labeling, and all things in such place, including records, files, financial data, sales data, shipping data, pricing data, employee data, research, papers, processes, controls and facilities, and (iii) inventory any stock of marijuana therein and obtain samples of any marijuana or marijuana product, any labels or containers for marijuana, paraphernalia, and of any finished and unfinished material.

 

U.S. Attorney Statements in Connecticut

 

To the knowledge of management of the Company, there have not been any statements or guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in Connecticut.

 

Florida

 

Florida Legislative History

 

On June 16, 2014, the Florida state governor signed Senate Bill 1030, also known as the Compassionate Medical Cannabis Act of 2014 (“CMCA”). The CMCA legalized low THC for medical patients suffering from cancer or “a physical medical condition that chronically produces symptoms of seizures”, such as epilepsy, “or severe and persistent muscle spasms”. The CMCA requires physician approval and determination that no other satisfactory alternative treatment options exist for that patient. The CMCA also authorizes medical centers to conduct research on low THC cannabis.

 

On November 8, 2016, Amendment 2 was added to Florida’s state constitution. Amendment 2 protects qualifying patients, caregivers, physicians, and medical cannabis dispensaries and their staff from criminal prosecution or civil sanctions under Florida law. Amendment 2 also expanded the definition of debilitating diseases to include 12 conditions including HIV/AIDS, Crohn’s disease and post-traumatic stress disorder. Amendment 2 became effective on January 3, 2017. Amendment 2 provides a regulatory framework that requires licensed producers, which are statutorily defined as Medical Marijuana Treatment Centers (each, a “MMTC”), to cultivate, process and dispense medical cannabis in a vertically integrated marketplace.

 

96

 

 

Florida Licenses

 

Licenses are issued by the Florida Department of Health (“FDH”) and is overseen by the Office of Medical Marijuana Use (“OMMU”). Applicants are required to provide comprehensive business plans with demonstrated knowledge and experience on execution, detailed facility plans, forecasted performance and robust financial resources. Technical ability on plant and medical cannabis cultivation, infrastructure, processing, dispensing and safety are also assessed.

 

License holders are permitted to maintain one license. However, the one license allows the licensee to open one cultivation/processing site and an unlimited number of dispensaries. Each licensee is required to cultivate, process and dispense medical cannabis. The license permits the sale of derivative products produced from extracted cannabis plant oil as medical cannabis to qualified patients. As of December 25, 2020, there were 456,594 patients with an approved medical ID card, 22 approved medical cannabis treatment centers and 301 approved retail dispensing locations . Licensed medical cannabis treatment centers are authorized to cultivate, process and dispense medical cannabis.

 

On January 4, 2019, High Street completed the acquisition of Acreage Florida, Inc. (“Acreage Florida”). Acreage Florida acquired a cultivation and production facility in Sanderson, Florida, and has secured via lease agreements eight locations to build or remodel dispensaries in Hollywood, Spring Hill, Daytona, Orange Park, St. Petersburg, North Miami Beach and two locations in Miami. Acreage Florida opened its first dispensary in Spring Hill in March 2020.

 

The table below lists the licenses issued to the subsidiaries:

 

Subsidiary License number City Expiration
Date
Description
Acreage Florida, Inc. d/b/ The Botanist MMTC-2018-0014   9/11/2021 Vertical

 

Under its license, Acreage Florida is permitted to sell cannabis to those patients who are entered into Florida’s electronic medical marijuana use registry by a qualified physician and possess a state-issued medical marijuana identification card. The physician determines patient eligibility as well as the routes of administration (e.g. topical, oral, inhalation) and number of milligrams per day a patient is able to obtain under the program. The physician may order a certification for up to three 70-day supply limits of marijuana, following which the certification expires and a new certification must be issued by a physician. The number of milligrams dispensed, the category of cannabis (either low-THC or medical cannabis) and whether a delivery device such as a vaporizer has been authorized is all recorded in the registry for each patient transaction. On March 18, 2019, Governor Ron DeSantis signed SB 182 into law, repealing the ban on smoking medical cannabis. Patients and their doctors now have greater access to administer medical cannabis and to decide for themselves which mode of administration is best for them. Effective August 27, 2020 the OMMU amended the Florida Administrative code to allow the purchase of edibles. SB 182 also allows patients to receive up to 2.5 ounces of whole flower cannabis every 35 days as recommended by their doctor and requires patients under the age of 18 to have a terminal condition and to get a second opinion from a pediatrician before smoking medical cannabis.

 

Dispensaries may be located in any location throughout the State of Florida as long as the local government has not issued a prohibition against MMTC dispensaries in their respective municipality. Provided there is not a ban, the Company may locate a dispensary in a site zoned for a pharmacy so long as the location is greater than 500 feet from a public or private elementary, middle, or secondary school.

 

On February 25, 2020, we entered into an agreement to sell all of our operations in Florida for an aggregate purchase price of $60.0 million. The sale is expected to close during the second quarter of 2021 subject to customary closing conditions including the procurement of all necessary approvals for the transfer to the purchaser of the Florida license for the operation of the medical marijuana businesses.

 

Florida Reporting Requirements

 

Florida regulators require MMTCs to establish, maintain, and control a computer software tracking system that traces cannabis from seed to sale and allows real-time, 24-hour access by the OMMU to such data. The tracking system must allow for integration of other seed-to-sale systems and, at a minimum, include notification of certain events, including when marijuana seeds are planted, when marijuana plants are harvested and destroyed and when cannabis is transported, sold, stolen, diverted, or lost. Each medical marijuana treatment center shall use the seed-to-sale tracking system established by the department or integrate its own seed-to-sale tracking system with the seed-to-sale tracking system established by the department. Additionally, the OMMU also maintains a patient and physician registry and the licensee must comply with all requirements and regulations relative to the provision of required data or proof of key events to said system in order to retain its license. Florida requires all MMTCs to abide by representations made in their original application to the State of Florida. Any changes or expansions must be requested via an amendment or variance process.

 

97

 

 

Florida Licensing Requirements

 

Licenses issued by the FDH may be renewed biennially so long as the licensee continues to meet the requirements of the Florida Statute 381.986 and pays a renewal fee. License holders can only own one license within the State of Florida. MMTCs can operate an unlimited number of dispensaries. Applicants must demonstrate (and licensed MMTCs must maintain) that: (i) they have been registered to do business in the State of Florida for the previous five years, (ii) they possess a valid certificate of registration issued by the Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, (iii) they have the technical and technological ability to cultivate and produce cannabis, including, but not limited to, low-THC cannabis, (iv) they have the ability to secure the premises, resources, and personnel necessary to operate as an MMTC, (v) they have the ability to maintain accountability of all raw materials, finished products, and any by-products to prevent diversion or unlawful access to or possession of these substances, (vi) they have an infrastructure reasonably located to dispense cannabis to registered qualified patients statewide or regionally as determined by the OMMU, (vii) they have the financial ability to maintain operations for the duration of the two-year approval cycle, including the provision of certified financial statements to the OMMU, (viii) all owners, officers, board members and managers have passed a Level II background screening, inclusive of fingerprinting, and ensure that a medical director is employed to supervise the activities of the MMTC, and (ix) they have a diversity plan and veterans plan accompanied by a contractual process for establishing business relationships with veterans and minority contractors and/or employees. Upon approval of the application by the OMMU, the applicant must post a performance bond of up to US$5 million, which may be reduced to US$2 million once the licensee has served 1,000 patients.

 

Florida Inventory Storage

 

OMMU regulators require that the MMTC license holder establish, maintain, and control a computer software tracking system that traces cannabis from seed to sale and allows real-time, 24-hour access by the department to data from all MMTCs and cannabis testing laboratories. At a minimum, the T&T system will track when cannabis seeds are planted, harvested and destroyed, and when cannabis is transported, sold, stolen, diverted, or lost. The OMMU has not chosen a unified system. Therefore, the licensee can choose their own T&T system.

 

Florida Security

 

With respect to security requirements for cultivation, processing and dispensing facilities, a MMTC must maintain a fully operational alarm system that secures all entry points and perimeter windows, and is equipped with motion detectors, pressure switches, duress, panic and hold-up alarms. The MMTC must also have a 24-hour video surveillance system with the following features: (a) cameras positioned for the clear identification of persons and activities in controlled areas including growing, processing, storage, disposal and point-of-sale rooms, (b) cameras fixed on entrances and exits to the premises, and (c) ability to record images clearly and accurately together with the time and date. Facilities may not display products or dispense cannabis or cannabis delivery devices in the waiting area and may not dispense cannabis from its premises between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. However, it may perform all other operations and deliver cannabis to qualified patients 24 hours a day.

 

Cannabis must be stored in a secured, locked room or a vault. A MMTC must have at least two employees, or two employees of a security agency, on the premises at all times where cultivation, processing, or storing of cannabis occurs. A cannabis transportation manifest must be maintained in any vehicle transporting cannabis or a cannabis delivery device. The manifest must be generated from the MMTC’s seed-to-sale tracking system. Further, a copy of the transportation manifest must be provided to the MMTC when receiving a delivery. Each MMTC must retain copies of all cannabis transportation manifests for at least three years. Cannabis and cannabis delivery devices must be locked in a separate compartment or container within the vehicle and employees transporting cannabis or cannabis delivery devices must always have their employee identification on them. Lastly, at least two people must be in a vehicle transporting cannabis, and at least one person must remain in the vehicle while the cannabis is physically delivered.

 

Florida Transportation

 

When transporting cannabis to dispensaries or to patients for delivery, a manifest must be prepared and transportation must be done using an approved vehicle. The cannabis must be stored in a separate, locked area of the vehicle and at all times there must be two people in a delivery vehicle. During deliveries, one person must remain with the vehicle. The delivery employees must at all times have identification badges. The manifest for all deliveries must be generated by the State approved tracking software. The manifest must include the following information: (i) departure date and time; (ii) name, address and license number of the originating MMTC; (iii) name and address of the receiving entity; (iv) the quantity, form and delivery device of the cannabis; (v) arrival date and time; (vi) the make, model and license plate of the delivery vehicle; and (vii) the name and signatures of the MMTC delivery employees. These manifests must be kept by the MMTC for inspection for at least three years. During the delivery, a copy of the manifest is also provided to the recipient.

 

98

 

 

Florida Inspections

 

The OMMU may conduct announced or unannounced inspections of MMTC’s to determine compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The OMMU is to inspect an MMTC upon receiving a complaint or notice that the MMTC has dispensed cannabis containing mold, bacteria, or other contaminants that may cause an adverse effect to humans or the environment. The OMMU is to conduct at least a biennial inspection of each MMTC to evaluate the MMTC’s records, personnel, equipment, security, sanitation practices, and quality assurance practices.

 

U.S. Attorney Statements in Florida

 

To the knowledge of management of the Company, there have not been any statements or guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in Florida.

 

Illinois

 

Illinois Legislative history

 

The Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act (the “IL Medical Act”) was signed into law in August 2013 and took effect on January 1, 2014. The IL Medical Act provides medical cannabis access to registered patients who suffer from a list of over 50 medical conditions including epilepsy, cancer, HIV/AIDS, Chronic pain, Crohn’s disease and post- traumatic stress disorder. As of December 30, 2020, approximately 150,000 patients have been registered under the IL Medical Act and are qualified to purchase cannabis and cannabis products from registered dispensaries. On August 12, 2019, changes to the Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Program became effective.

 

On June 25, 2019, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed into law the Cannabis Regulation & Tax Act (the “IL Adult Use Act” and, together with the IL Medical Act, the “IL Acts”), which permits persons 21 years of age or older to possess, use, and purchase limited amounts of cannabis for personal use. The IL Adult Use Act went into effect on January 1, 2020.

 

Illinois Licenses

 

Oversight and implementation under the Acts are divided among three Illinois state departments: the Department of Public Health (the “IL DPH”), the Department of Agriculture (the “IL DA”), and the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (the “IL DFPR”). The IL DPH oversees the following IL Medical Act mandates: (a) establish and maintain a confidential registry of caregivers and qualifying patients authorized to engage in the medical use of cannabis, (b) distribute educational materials about the health risks associated with the abuse of cannabis and prescription medications, (c) adopt rules to administer the patient and caregiver registration program, and (d) adopt rules establishing food handling requirements for cannabis-infused products that are prepared for human consumption.

 

It is the responsibility of the IL DA to enforce the provisions of the IL Acts relating to the registration and oversight of cultivation centers and the responsibility of the IL DFPR to enforce the provisions of the IL Acts relating to the registration and oversight of dispensing organizations. The IL DPH, IL DA and IL DFPR may enter into inter-governmental agreements, as necessary, to carry out the provisions of the IL Acts.

 

Illinois has issued a limited amount of dispensary, producer/grower, and processing licenses. As of December 31, 2020 there were 55 licensed dispensaries and 22 licensed cultivators. NCC LLC (d/b/a Nature’s Care Company) (“NCC”), an indirect Subsidiary of the Company, was awarded both medical and adult-use cannabis dispensary licenses and In Grown Farms, LLC 2 (“IGF”), an indirect Subsidiary of the Company, was awarded both medical and adult-use cultivation/processing licenses as well as a license to process industrial Hemp.

 

Under the IL Adult Use Act, medical cannabis operators have the ability to apply for “early approval” for adult-use licenses. Medical dispensaries are permitted to apply for one adult-use license at its medical dispensary site and one additional early approval license at a secondary site. NCC received an adult-use license on February 3, 2020 for its Rolling Meadows dispensary. On August 30, 2020, NCC received a second license from the IL DFPR for a Registered Adult Use Dispensing Organization. NCC has opened a second adult only dispensary in Chicago.

 

99

 

 

The table below lists the licenses issued to the subsidiaries:

 

Subsidiary License number City Expiration Description
NCC LLC DISP.000024 Rolling Meadows 1/22/2021 Medical Cannabis Dispensary Facility
NCC LCC AUDO.000050 Rolling Meadows 3/31/2021 Registered Adult Use Dispensing Organization
IGF 1503060729 Freeport 3/9/2021

Medical Cannabis Cultivation/

Processing Facility

IGF 1503060729-EA Freeport 3/31/2021 Early Approval Adult Use Cultivation
NCC LLC AUDO.000064 Chicago 3/31/2021 Registered Adult Use Dispensing Organization
IGF 1204-321 Freeport 12/31/2022 Industrial Hemp Processor

 

Under the IL Medical Act, dispensary, grower, and processing licenses are valid for one year. After the initial term, licensees are required to submit renewal applications. Pursuant to the IL Act, registration renewal applications must be received 45 days prior to expiration and may be denied if the licensee has a history of non-compliance and penalties.

 

Under the IL Adult Use Act, an early approval adult-use dispensing license is valid until March 31, 2021. Renewal applications and required fees must be submitted to the IL DFPR 60 days prior to expiration.

 

Illinois Dispensing Limitations

 

Dispensing organizations may not dispense more than 2.5 ounces of usable cannabis to qualifying patients, provisional patients, or designated caregivers during a period of 14 days, unless pre-approved by the IL DFPR.

 

Dispensing limitations for adult-use purchasers are as follows:

 

Illinois Residents: 30 grams of flower, 500 mg THC in cannabis infused products, and/or 5 grams of cannabis concentrate.
     
Non-Illinois Residents: 15 grams of flower, 250 mg THC in cannabis infused products, and/or 250 milligrams of cannabis concentrate.

 

Illinois Record-keeping/Reporting

 

Illinois uses the BioTrack THC T&T system to manage the flow of reported data between each licensee and the state. NCC also uses the T&T system to ensure all reporting requirements are met. Information processed through the T&T system must be maintained in a secure location at the dispensing organization for five years.

 

Licensees are mandated by the IL Acts to maintain records electronically and make them available for inspection by the IL DFPR upon request. Records that must be maintained and made available, as described in the IL Acts, include: (a) operating procedures, (b) inventory records, policies, and procedures, (c) security records, and (d) staffing plans. All dispensing organization records, including business records such as monetary transactions and bank statements, must be kept for a minimum of three years. Records of destruction and disposal of all cannabis not sold, including notification to the IL DFPR and State Police, must be retained at the dispensary organization for a period of not less than five years.

 

Illinois Inventory/Storage

 

The IL Acts have similar requirements regarding inventory tracking and storage. An organization’s agent-in-charge has primary oversight of the dispensing organization’s cannabis inventory control system. Under the IL Acts, a dispensary’s inventory control system must be real-time, web-based, and accessible by the IL DFPR 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The T&T system used by NCC complies with such requirements.

 

100

 

 

The inventory control system of a dispensing organization must record all cannabis sales, waste, and acquisitions. Specifically, the inventory system must track and reconcile through the T&T system each day’s cannabis beginning inventory, acquisitions, sales, disposal and ending inventory. Tracked information must include (a) product descriptions including the quantity, strain, variety and batch number of each product received, (b) the name and registry identification number of the permitted cultivation center providing the cannabis, (c) the name and registry identification number of the permitted cultivation center agent delivering the cannabis, (d) the name and registry identification number of the dispensing organization agent receiving the cannabis, and (e) the date of acquisition. Dispensary managers are tasked with conducting and documenting monthly audits of the dispensing organization’s daily inventory according to generally accepted accounting principles.

 

The inventory control system of a cultivator and processing organization must conduct a weekly inventory of cannabis stock, which includes at a minimum, the date of the inventory, a summary of the inventory findings, the name, signature and title of the individuals who conducted the inventory and the agent-in-charge who oversaw the inventory, and the product name and quantity of cannabis plants or cannabis-infused products at the facility. The record of all cannabis sold must include the date of sale, the name of the dispensary facility to which the cannabis was sold and the batch number, product name and quantity of cannabis sold.

 

In addition, the T&T permits NCC to set up separate sales reports for (i) sales to qualifying patients and (ii) sales to purchasers, and NCC uses such software to generate separate such reports as is required by the IL Adult Use Act.

 

Storage of cannabis and cannabis product inventory is also regulated by the IL Acts. Inventory must be stored on the dispensary’s licensed premises in a restricted access area. Appropriate storage temperatures, containers, and lighting are required to ensure the quality and purity of cannabis inventory is not adversely affected.

 

Illinois Security

 

Under the IL Acts, dispensaries must implement security measures to deter and prevent entry into and theft from restricted access areas containing either cannabis or currency. Mandated security measures include security systems, panic alarms, and locked doors or barriers between the facility’s entrance and limited access areas. Admission to the limited access areas must be restricted to only purchasers, registered qualifying patients, designated caregivers, principal officers, and agents conducting business with the dispensing organization. Visitors and persons conducting business with the licensee in limited access areas must always wear identification badges and be escorted by a licensee’s agent authorized to enter the restricted access area, and such persons must be pre-approved by the IL DFPR. A visitor’s log must be kept on-site and be maintained for five years.

 

The IL Acts provide that 24-hour video surveillance of both a licensee’s interior and exterior are required to be taken and kept for at least 90 days. Unless prohibited by law, video of all interior dispensary areas, including all points of entry and exit, safes, sales areas, and storage areas must be kept. Unobstructed video of the exterior perimeter, including the storefront, grow facility and the parking lot, must also be kept. Video surveillance cameras are required to be angled to allow for facial recognition and the capture of clear and certain identification of any person entering or exiting the dispensary area. Additionally, all video must be taken in lighting sufficient for clear viewing during all times of night or day. The IL Acts also require all security equipment to be inspected and tested within regular 30-day intervals.

 

Illinois Transportation

 

Prior to transporting any cannabis or cannabis-infused product, a cultivation facility must:

 

Complete a shipping manifest using a form prescribed by the IL DA; and
Securely transmit a copy of the manifest to the dispensary facility that will receive the products and to the IL DA before the close of business the day prior to transport. The manifest must be made available to the Illinois State Police upon request.

 

The cultivation facility shall maintain all shipping manifests and make them available at the request of the IL DA.

 

Cannabis products that are being transported shall:

 

Only be transported in a locked, safe and secure storage compartment that is part of the motor vehicle transporting the cannabis, or in a locked storage container that has a separate key or combination pad; and
Not be visible from outside the motor vehicle.

 

101

 

 

Any motor vehicle transporting cannabis is required travel directly from the cultivation facility to the dispensary facility, or a testing laboratory, and must not make any stops in between except to other dispensary facilities or laboratories, for refueling or in case of an emergency. A cultivation center shall ensure that all delivery times and routes are randomized. A cultivation center shall staff all transport motor vehicles with a minimum of two employees. At least one delivery team member shall remain with the motor vehicle at all times that the motor vehicle contains cannabis. Each delivery team member shall have access to a secure form of communication with personnel at the cultivation center and the ability to contact law enforcement through the 911 emergency system at all times that the motor vehicle contains cannabis. Each delivery team member shall possess his or her department issued identification card at all times when transporting or delivering cannabis and shall produce it for the IL DA or IL DA’s authorized representative or law enforcement official upon request.

 

Illinois Inspections

 

Dispensing organizations are subject to random and unannounced dispensary inspections and cannabis testing by the IL DFPR and Illinois State Police. The IL DFPR and its authorized representatives may enter any place, including a vehicle, in which cannabis is held, stored, dispensed, sold, produced, delivered, transported, manufactured or disposed of and inspect in a reasonable manner, the place and all pertinent equipment, containers and labeling, and all materials, data and processes, and inventory any stock of cannabis and obtain samples of any cannabis or cannabis product, any labels or containers for cannabis, or paraphernalia.

 

The IL DFPR may conduct an investigation of an applicant, application, dispensing organization, principal officer, dispensary agent, third party vendor or any other party associated with a dispensing organization for an alleged violation of the IL Acts or to determine qualifications to be granted a registration by the IL DFPR. The IL DFPR may require an applicant or dispensing organization to produce documents, records or any other material pertinent to the investigation of an application or alleged violations of the IL Act.

 

Cannabis cultivation centers are also subject to random inspections by the IL DA.

 

Guarantee of Cannabis and Cannabis-Infused Product Variety

 

The IL Adult Use Act requires that dispensing organizations maintain inventory from any one supplier representing greater than 40% of the dispensing organization’s total Inventory. NCC monitors inventory offered for sale on a weekly basis and ensure that no single cultivator’s products comprise more than 40% of the inventory offered for sale at NCC. NCC produces a periodic inventory report from BioTrackTHC to determine the inventory percentages of purchases by cultivator.

 

The IL Adult Use Act further requires that a dispensing organization have a policy to prioritize serving patients and other medical program participants over purchasers.

 

U.S. Attorney Statements in Illinois

 

To the knowledge of management of the Company, other than as disclosed in this Prospectus, there have not been any statements or guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in Illinois. See “Risk Factors - The Company’s Business Activities are Illegal under U.S. Federal Law”.

 

Maine

 

Maine Legislative history

 

Maine has allowed qualified patients with specific conditions to grow for their own usage and possess limited amounts of medical cannabis since November 1999, but the law lacked any distribution mechanism. On November 3, 2009, Maine voters approved Question 5, which established dispensaries and caregivers are able to grow and dispense up to 2.5 oz. of medical grade cannabis every two weeks to persons with one of 17 debilitating and chronic medical conditions including HIV/AIDS, Crohn’s disease, cancer and post-traumatic stress disorder. The registered dispensaries and caregivers were regulated by the Maine Department of Health and Human Services (“MDHHS”), but oversight was recently shifted to the Maine Department of Administrative and Financial Services (“MDAFS”).

 

In November 2016, Maine approved cannabis legalization at the ballot. On January 27, 2017, the legislature approved a moratorium on implementing parts of the law regarding retail sales and taxation until at least February 2018, giving time to resolve issues and promulgate rules. The portion of the law that allows persons over 21 years to grow six mature plants and possess, transport and gift up to 2.5 ounces became effective on January 30, 2017 (although this was limited to three mature plants in the 2018 legislation). A 17-member special legislative committee was formed to address the complex issues surrounding full implementation of the law. In April 2018, the Governor of Maine vetoed the bill to legalize cannabis for adult-use. However, in May 2018, Maine lawmakers overrode the Governor’s veto clearing the way for adult-use. In February 2019, MDAFS created the Office of Marijuana Policy (“OMP”) to oversee all aspects of adult-use marijuana. The adult-use regulations were adopted in June 2019. Furthermore, a mandatory “opt-in” mechanism allows municipalities to control whether they want retail cannabis establishments in their communities. The State of Maine first made adult-use applications available on December 5, 2019 and the first conditional licenses were issued on March 13, 2020. The OMP intended to launch adult-use in spring 2020, before the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the postponement of these plans. The first active licenses were issued to adult-use establishments on Tuesday, September 8, 2020. Actively licensed adult-use marijuana stores were able to begin retail sales to the public on or after October 9, 2020.

 

102

 

 

Maine Registration Certificates

 

The Maine Medical Use of Marijuana Program Rules and the enabling statute, the Maine Medical Use of Marijuana Act, govern the Maine Medical Use of Marijuana Program (“MMUMP”). The MDHHS was originally responsible for administering the MMUMP to ensure qualifying patients’ access to safe cannabis for medical use and was responsible for issuing dispensary registration certificates as well as caregiver certificates. The MMUMP through the MDHHS issued eight dispensary registration certificates. However, the MMUMP was transferred to the MDAFS in May 2018, as part of LD 1719, which implemented the adult-use program.

 

Northeast Patient Group d/b/a Wellness Connection of Maine (“WCM”), a contractual party and debtor of the Company, holds four of the eight vertically integrated dispensary certificates of registration. The South Portland location was converted to adult-use and is owned directly by a subsidiary of Acreage.

 

The table below lists the certificates issued to WCM and our subsidiary:

 

MSA Party Certificate of
Registration
City Expiration Date Description
WCM DSP107 Portland 4/11/2021 Dispensary
WCM DSP103 Gardiner 12/22/2021 Dispensary
WCM DSP108 Brewer 6/15/2021 Dispensary
WCM DSP102 Auburn Not applicable Cultivation

 

Subsidiary License number City Expiration Description
NPG LLC AMS338 South Portland 11/22/2021 Adult Use Dispensary

 

The Maine vertically integrated dispensary certificate of registration is valid for one year from the date of issuance. Each certificate of registration for dispensaries allows cultivation, processing and dispensing. WCM cultivates and processes at one centralized location for its three operational dispensaries. The cultivation facility and retail site of a dispensary must comply with all requirements and prohibitions of the Maine statutes and regulations. Failure to comply may result in enforcement action including, but not limited to, termination of the registration certificate. The dispensary must receive both state licensing and municipal approval. The South Portland dispensary location is an adult-use dispensary and operates separately from our managed dispensaries in Maine.

 

The dispensary must submit an application for the renewal of a current registration certificate with all required documentation and the required fees 60 days prior to the expiration date. Failure to submit a timely, complete renewal packet may be grounds for denial of the renewal and may result in expiration of the registration certificate to operate the dispensary. Once the application is received and validated, an inspection is scheduled which is conditional for the renewal. The certificate of registration holders must ensure that no cannabis may be sold, delivered, transported or distributed by a producer from or to a location outside of Maine.

 

Maine Record-keeping/Reporting

 

Maine does not yet have a unified, mandatory T&T system, although one will be implemented through the development of the adult-use program. However, WCM tracks seed-to-sale via an integrated platform. Required information is forwarded to the MMUMP through email. The operating documents of a registered dispensary must include procedures to ensure accurate record keeping. Registered dispensaries must maintain at least the following: business records, including records of assets and liabilities, tax returns, contracts, monetary transactions, checks, invoices and vouchers which the dispensary keeps as its books of accounts. Business records also include the sales record that indicates the name of the qualifying patient or primary caregiver to whom cannabis has been distributed, sold or donated, including the quantity and form. The registered dispensary must also keep on file and available for MDHHS (now MDAFS) inspection upon request, a copy of each current patient’s registry identification, a copy of the medical provider written certification and the MMUMP approved dispensary designation form. All business records must be available upon request by the MDHHS (now MDAFS) and maintained and retained for six years.

 

103

 

 

Maine Inventory/Storage

 

All cultivation facilities for medical use are restricted to cultivating in an enclosed, locked facility or area. Cannabis at a registered dispensary must be kept under double lock and inventoried daily by two cardholders. Each patient’s transactions are recorded and controlled in the POS system to prevent any patient to access more than the allowed limit. WCM monitors inventory daily and reports inventory supply monthly.

 

Maine Security

 

Cultivation of cannabis for medical use requires implementation of appropriate security measures to discourage theft of cannabis, ensure safety and prevent unauthorized entrance to a cultivation site in accordance with the MMUMP statute and rules. Requirements include but are not limited to an enclosed, locked facility and enclosed outdoor areas must have durable locks to discourage theft and unauthorized entrance.

 

Registered dispensaries must implement appropriate security measures to deter and prevent unauthorized entrance into areas containing cannabis and the theft of cannabis at the registered dispensary and the grow location for the cultivation of cannabis. Security measures to protect the premises, the public, qualifying patients, primary caregivers and principal officers, board members and employees of the registered dispensary must include, but are not limited to (a) on-site parking, (b) exterior lighting sufficient to deter nuisance activity and facilitate surveillance, (c) devices or a series of devices, including, but not limited to, a signal system interconnected with a radio frequency method such as cellular, private radio signals, or other mechanical or electronic device to detect an unauthorized intrusion, and (d) interior electronic monitoring, video cameras, and panic buttons. Electronic monitoring and video camera recordings must be maintained by the medical dispensary and cultivation facility a minimum of 14 days. Electronic monitoring and video camera recordings must be maintained by the adult-use dispensary and facility a minimum of 45 days.

 

Maine Inspections

 

Registered dispensaries, including all retail and cultivation locations, are subject to inspection at least annually by the MDAFS in accordance with this rule and the statute. Submission of an application for a dispensary registration certificate constitutes permission for entry and inspection of dispensary locations. Failure to cooperate with required inspections may be grounds to revoke the dispensary's registration certificate. During an inspection, the MDAFS may identify violations of this rule, the statute and the dispensary's policies and procedures. The dispensary shall receive written notice of the nature of the violations. The dispensary shall notify the MDAFS in writing with a postmark date within ten business days of the date of the notice of violations and identify the corrective actions taken and the date of the correction.

 

During an inspection, the MDAFS shall (1) collect soil and plant samples, and samples of products containing marijuana prepared at the dispensary, (2) place the dispensary's registration number on each sample container, (3) label the sample containers with the description and quantity of its content, (4) seal sample containers, and (5) have dispensary and MDAFS staff initial each sample container.

 

U.S. Attorney Statements in Maine

 

To the knowledge of management of the Company, other than as disclosed in this Prospectus, there have not been any statements or guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in Maine. See “Risk Factors - The Company’s Business Activities are Illegal under U.S. Federal Law”.

 

Massachusetts

 

Massachusetts Legislative history

 

The Massachusetts Medical Use of Marijuana Program (the “MA Program”) was formed pursuant to the Act for the Humanitarian Medical Use of Marijuana (the “MA ACT”). The MA Program allows registered persons to purchase medical cannabis and applies to any patient, personal caregiver, Medical Marijuana Treatment Center (“MTC”). To qualify for the program, patients must have a debilitating condition as defined by the MA Program. Currently there are over nine conditions that allow a patient to acquire cannabis in Massachusetts, including AIDS/HIV, ALS, cancer and Crohn’s disease. As of May 31, 2019, approximately 59,000 patients have been registered to purchase medical cannabis products in Massachusetts. The MA Program is administrated by the Cannabis Control Commission (“CCC”).

 

104

 

 

In November 2016, Massachusetts voted affirmatively on a ballot petition to legalize and regulate cannabis for adult-use. The Massachusetts legislature amended the law on December 28, 2016, delaying the date adult-use cannabis sales would begin by six months. The delay allowed the legislature to clarify how municipal land-use regulations would treat the cultivation of cannabis and authorized a study of related issues. After further debate, the state House of Representatives and state Senate approved H.3818 which became Chapter 55 of the Acts of 2017, An Act to Ensure Safe Access to Marijuana, and established the CCC. The CCC consists of five commissioners and regulates the Massachusetts Recreational Marijuana Program as well as the MA Program. Adult-use of cannabis in Massachusetts started in July 2018.

 

Massachusetts Licenses

 

Under the MA Program, MTCs are heavily regulated. Vertically integrated MTCs grow, process, and dispense their own cannabis. As such, each MTC is required to have a retail facility as well as cultivation and processing operations, although retail operations may be separate from grow and cultivation operations. A MTC’s cultivation location may be in a different municipality or county than its retail facility. MTC’s are required to be Massachusetts non-profit corporations.

 

The MA Program mandates a comprehensive application process for MTCs. Each MTC applicant must submit a Certificate of Good Standing, comprehensive financial statements, a character competency assessment, and employment and education histories of the senior partners and individuals responsible for the day-to-day security and operation of the MTC. Municipalities may individually determine what local permits or licenses are required if an MTC wishes to establish an operation within its boundaries.

 

The table below lists the licenses issued to the subsidiaries and entities operating in Massachusetts with which the Company has a consulting services agreement:

 

Subsidiary License
Number
City Expiration Date Description
The Botanist, Inc. RMD-905 Sterling 5/17/2021 MTC Cultivation/Processing
The Botanist, Inc. RMD-905 Worcester 5/17/2021 MTC Dispensary
The Botanist, Inc. Provisional Leominster Not applicable RMD Dispensary
The Botanist, Inc. RMD-1225 Shrewsbury 6/06/2021 RMD Dispensary

 

Effective as of February 13, 2020, South Shore Biopharma, LLC and MA RMD SVCS, LLC, subsidiaries of the Company, entered into termination and separation agreements with PCMV and Health Circle, respectively. SSBP previously entered into a termination and separation agreement with Mass Medi Spa, Inc. Following termination, PCMV and Health Circle still have notes outstanding to the Company for all amounts previously advanced by the Company. As of the date hereof, notes payable of approximately $6 million and $4.3 million remain outstanding for PCMV and Health Circle, respectively. Our Shrewsbury and Worcester locations presently operate as adult-use dispensaries.

 

Each Massachusetts dispensary, grower and processor license is valid for one year and must be renewed no later than 60 calendar days prior to expiration. As in other states where cannabis is legal, the CCC can deny or revoke licenses and renewals for multiple reasons, including (a) submission of materially inaccurate, incomplete, or fraudulent information, (b) failure to comply with any applicable law or regulation, including laws relating to taxes, child support, workers compensation and insurance coverage, (c) failure to submit or implement a plan of correction (d) attempting to assign registration to another entity, (e) insufficient financial resources, (f) committing, permitting, aiding, or abetting of any illegal practices in the operation of the MTC, (g) failure to cooperate or give information to relevant law enforcement related to any matter arising out of conduct at an MTC, and (h) lack of responsible MTC operations, as evidenced by negligence, disorderly or unsanitary facilities or permitting a person to use a registration card belonging to another person. Additionally, license holders must ensure that no cannabis is sold, delivered, or distributed by a producer from or to a location outside of this state.

 

Massachusetts Dispensary Requirements (Medical)

 

A MTC is to follow its written and approved operation procedures in the operation of its dispensary locations. Operating procedures shall include (i) security measures in compliance with the MA Program; (ii) employee security policies including personal safety and crime prevention techniques; (iii) hours of operation and after-hours contact information; (iv) a price list for marijuana; (v) storage protocols in compliance with state law; (vi) a description of the various strains of marijuana that will be cultivated and dispensed, and the forms that will be dispensed; (vii) procedures to ensure accurate recordkeeping including inventory protocols; (viii) plans for quality control; (ix) a staffing plan and staffing records; (x) diversion identification and reporting protocols; and (xi) policies and procedures for the handling of cash on MTC premises including storage, collection frequency and transport to financial institutions. The siting of dispensary locations is expressly subject to local/municipal approvals pursuant to state law, and municipalities control the permitting application process that a MTC must comply with. More specifically, a MTC is to comply with all local requirements regarding siting, provided however that if no local requirements exist, a MTC shall not be sited within a radius of 500 feet of a school, daycare center, or any facility in which children commonly congregate. The 500-foot distance under this section is measured in a straight line from the nearest point of the facility in question to the nearest point of the proposed MTC. The MA Program requires that MTCs limit their inventory of seeds, plants, and useable marijuana to reflect the projected needs of registered qualifying patients. A MTC may only dispense to a registered qualifying patient who has a current valid certification.

 

105

 

 

Massachusetts Record-keeping/Reporting (Medical)

 

Massachusetts uses METRC as the T&T system. Individual licensees, whether directly or through a third-party application programming interface (an “API”), are required to push data to the state to meet all reporting requirements. Each of Health Circle, Inc., Mass Medi-Spa, Inc., Patient Centric Martha’s Vineyard, Ltd. and The Botanist, Inc. use or will use METRC to capture and send all required data points for cultivation, manufacturing, and retail as required by applicable law.

 

The MA Program requires that MTC records be readily available for inspection by the Department of Health upon request. Among the records that are required to be maintained and made available are: (a) operating procedures, (b) inventory records, and (c) seed-to-sale tracking records for all cannabis and cannabis infused products.

 

Massachusetts Inventory/Storage (Medical)

 

Through the T&T system, MTCs are required to record all actions related to each individual cannabis plant. This robust inventorying requirement includes tracking how each plant is handled and processed from seed and cultivation, through growth, harvest and preparation of cannabis infused products, if any, to final sale of finished products. This system must chronicle every step, ingredient, activity, transaction, and dispensary agent, registered qualifying patient, or personal caregiver who handles, obtains, or possesses the product. To meet this tracking requirement, the inventory tracking process is mandated to utilize unique plant and batch identification numbers. Besides capturing all processes associated with each cannabis plant, MTCs must also establish and abide by inventory controls and procedures for conducting inventory reviews and comprehensive inventories of cultivating, finished, and stored cannabis products. To ensure inventories are accurate, MTCs are not only required to conduct monthly inventories but also to compare monthly inventories to the T&T system records.

 

The MA Program requires all cannabis and cannabis infused products be securely stored. MTCs must ensure that all safes, vaults, and other equipment or areas used for the production, cultivation, harvesting, processing, or storage of cannabis and cannabis infused products are securely locked and protected against unauthorized entry. The MA Program also specifies that limited access areas, accessible only to authorized personnel, must be established in each dispensary. Furthermore, only the minimum number of employees essential to business operations may be given access to the limited access areas.

 

Massachusetts Security (Medical)

 

Adequate security systems that prevent and detect diversion, theft, or loss of cannabis are required of each MTC under the MA Program. Such security systems must utilize commercial grade equipment and are required to include (a) a perimeter alarm on all entry and exit points and perimeter windows, (b) a failure notification system that provides an audible, text, or visual notification of any failure in the surveillance system, and (c) a duress alarm, panic alarm, or holdup alarm connected to local public safety or law enforcement authorities.

 

To ensure MTCs meet the rigorous security standards laid out by the MA Program, use of surveillance cameras is mandated. MTCs must install video cameras in the following areas: (a) all areas that may contain cannabis, (b) all points of entry and exit, and (c) in any parking lot. Video cameras must be appropriate for the lighting conditions of the area under surveillance. Interior video cameras must be directed at all safes, vaults, sales areas, and areas where cannabis is cultivated, harvested, processed, prepared, stored, handled, or dispensed. Video surveillance is required to be operational 24 hours a day, seven days a week and all recordings must be retained for at least 90 calendar days.

 

Massachusetts Transportation (Medical)

 

The MA Program regulates the means and methods by which cannabis is transported. A MTC transporting cannabis must ensure the product is in a secure, locked storage compartment. If a cannabis establishment, pursuant to a cannabis transporter license is transporting cannabis products for more than one cannabis establishment at a time, the cannabis products for each cannabis establishment must be kept in separate locked storage compartments during transportation and separate manifests are required for each cannabis establishment. Vehicles transporting cannabis must be equipped with an approved alarm system and functioning heating and air conditioning systems appropriate for maintaining correct temperatures for storage of cannabis products. Additionally, cannabis products may not be visible from outside the vehicle and MTCs must ensure that all transportation times and routes are randomized. Cannabis and cannabis infused products may not be transported outside Massachusetts.

 

106

 

 

Massachusetts CCC Inspections (Medical)

 

The CCC or its agents may inspect a MTC and affiliated vehicles at any time without prior notice. A MTC shall immediately upon request make available to the CCC information that may be relevant to a CCC inspection, and the CCC may direct a MTC to test marijuana for contaminants. Any violations found will be noted in a deficiency statement that will be provided to the MTC, and the MTC shall thereafter submit a Plan of Correction to the CCC outlining with particularity each deficiency and the timetable and steps to remediate the same. The CCC shall have the authority to suspend or revoke a certificate of registration in accordance with 935 CMR 501.510 of the Regulation of adult-use cannabis in Massachusetts.

 

Regulation of the Adult Use Cannabis Market in Massachusetts

 

Adult-use (recreational) marijuana has been legal in Massachusetts since December 15, 2016, following a ballot initiative in November of that year. The CCC, a regulatory body created in 2018, licenses adult-use cultivation, processing and dispensary facilities (collectively, “Marijuana Establishments”) pursuant to 935 CMR 500.000 et seq. The first adult-use marijuana facilities in Massachusetts began operating in November 2018.

 

Massachusetts Licensing Requirements (Adult-Use)

 

Many of the same application requirements exist for a Marijuana Establishment license as a MTC application, and each owner, officer or member must undergo background checks and fingerprinting with the CCC. Applicants must submit the location and identification of each site, and must establish a property interest in the same, and the applicant and the local municipality must have entered into a host agreement authorizing the location of the adult-use Marijuana Establishment within the municipality, and said agreement must be included in the application. Applicants must include disclosure of any regulatory actions against it by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, as well as the civil and criminal history of the applicant and its owners, officers, principals or members. The application must include the MTC applicant’s plans for separating medical and adult-use operations, proposed timeline for achieving operations, liability insurance, business plan, and a detailed summary describing and/or updating or modifying the MTC’s existing medical marijuana operating policies and procedures for adult-use including security, prevention of diversion, storage, transportation, inventory procedures, quality control, dispensing procedures, personnel policies, record keeping, maintenance of financial records and employee training protocols.

 

No person or entity may own more than 10% or “control” more than three licenses in each Marijuana Establishment class (i.e., marijuana retailer, marijuana cultivator, marijuana product manufacturer). Additionally, there is a 100,000 square foot cultivation canopy for adult-use licenses; however, there is no canopy restriction for MTC license holders relative to their cultivation facility.

 

Massachusetts Dispensary Requirements (Adult-Use)

 

Marijuana retailers are subject to certain operational requirements in addition to those imposed on marijuana establishments generally. Dispensaries must immediately inspect patrons’ identification to ensure that everyone who enters is at least twenty-one years of age. Dispensaries may not dispense more than one ounce of marijuana or five grams of marijuana concentrate per transaction. Point-of-sale systems must be approved by the CCC, and retailers must record sales data. Records must be retained and available for auditing by the CCC and Department of Revenue. Dispensaries must also make patient education materials available to patrons. Such materials must include:

 

A warning that marijuana has not been analyzed or approved by the FDA, that there is limited information on side effects, that there may be health risks associated with using marijuana, and that it should be kept away from children;
A warning that when under the influence of marijuana, driving is prohibited by M.G.L. c. 90, § 24, and machinery should not be operated;
Information to assist in the selection of marijuana, describing the potential differing effects of various strains of marijuana, as well as various forms and routes of administration;
Materials offered to consumers to enable them to track the strains used and their associated effects;
Information describing proper dosage and titration for different routes of administration, with an emphasis on using the smallest amount possible to achieve the desired effect;
A discussion of tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal;
Facts regarding substance abuse signs and symptoms, as well as referral information for substance abuse treatment programs;
A statement that consumers may not sell marijuana to any other individual;

 

107

 

 

Information regarding penalties for possession or distribution of marijuana in violation of Massachusetts law; and
Any other information required by the CCC.

 

Massachusetts Security and Storage Requirements (Adult-Use)

 

Each marijuana establishment must implement sufficient safety measures to deter and prevent unauthorized entrance into areas containing marijuana and theft of marijuana at the establishment. Security measures taken by the establishments to protect the premises, employees, consumers and general public shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

 

Positively identifying individuals seeking access to the premises of the Marijuana Establishment or to whom or marijuana products are being transported pursuant to 935 CMR 500.105(14) to limit access solely to individuals 21 years of age or older;
Adopting procedures to prevent loitering and ensure that only individuals engaging in activity expressly or by necessary implication permitted by these regulations and its enabling statute are allowed to remain on the premises;
Disposing of marijuana in accordance with 935 CMR 500.105(12) in excess of the quantity required for normal, efficient operation as established within 935 CMR 500.105;
Securing all entrances to the Marijuana Establishment to prevent unauthorized access;
Establishing limited access areas pursuant to 935 CMR 500.110(4), which shall be accessible only to specifically authorized personnel limited to include only the minimum number of employees essential for efficient operation;
Storing all finished marijuana products in a secure, locked safe or vault in such a manner as to prevent diversion, theft and loss;
Keeping all safes, vaults, and any other equipment or areas used for the production, cultivation, harvesting, processing or storage of marijuana products securely locked and protected from entry, except for the actual time required to remove or replace marijuana;
Keeping all locks and security equipment in good working order;
Prohibiting keys, if any, from being left in the locks or stored or placed in a location accessible to persons other than specifically authorized personnel;
Prohibiting accessibility of security measures, such as combination numbers, passwords or electronic or biometric security systems, to persons other than specifically authorized personnel;
Ensuring that the outside perimeter of the marijuana establishment is sufficiently lit to facilitate surveillance, where applicable;
Ensuring that all marijuana products are kept out of plain sight and are not visible from a public place without the use of binoculars, optical aids or aircraft;
Developing emergency policies and procedures for securing all product following any instance of diversion, theft or loss of marijuana, and conduct an assessment to determine whether additional safeguards are necessary;
Developing sufficient additional safeguards as required by the CCC for marijuana establishments that present special security concerns; and
Sharing the marijuana establishment's security plan and procedures with law enforcement authorities and fire services and periodically updating law enforcement authorities and fire services if the plans or procedures are modified in a material way.
Marijuana must be stored in special limited access areas, and alarm systems must meet certain technical requirements, including the ability to record footage to be retained for at least 90 days.

 

Massachusetts Transportation Requirements (Adult-Use)

 

Marijuana products may only be transported between licensed marijuana establishments by registered marijuana establishment agents. A licensed marijuana transporter may contract with a licensed marijuana establishment to transport that licensee's marijuana products to other licensed establishments. The originating and receiving licensed establishments shall ensure that all transported marijuana products are linked to the seed-to-sale tracking program. For the purposes of tracking, seeds and clones will be properly tracked and labeled in a form and manner determined by the CCC. Any marijuana product that is undeliverable or is refused by the destination marijuana establishment shall be transported back to the originating establishment. All vehicles transporting marijuana products shall be staffed with a minimum of two marijuana establishment agents. At least one agent shall remain with the vehicle at all times that the vehicle contains marijuana or marijuana products. Prior to the products leaving a marijuana establishment for the purpose of transporting marijuana products, the originating marijuana establishment must weigh, inventory, and account for, on video, all marijuana products to be transported. Within eight hours after arrival at the destination marijuana establishment, the destination establishment must re-weigh, re-inventory, and account for, on video, all marijuana products transported. When videotaping the weighing, inventorying, and accounting of marijuana products before transportation or after receipt, the video must show each product being weighed, the weight, and the manifest. Marijuana products must be packaged in sealed, labeled, and tamper or child-resistant packaging prior to and during transportation. In the case of an emergency stop during the transportation of marijuana products, a log must be maintained describing the reason for the stop, the duration, the location, and any activities of personnel exiting the vehicle. A marijuana establishment or a marijuana transporter transporting marijuana products is required to ensure that all transportation times and routes are randomized. An establishment or transporter transporting marijuana products shall ensure that all transport routes remain within Massachusetts. All vehicles and transportation equipment used in the transportation of cannabis products or edibles requiring temperature control for safety must be designed, maintained, and equipped as necessary to provide adequate temperature control to prevent the cannabis products or edibles from becoming unsafe during transportation, consistent with applicable requirements pursuant to 21 CFR 1.908(c).

 

108

 

 

Vehicles used for transport must be owned or leased by the marijuana establishment or transporter, and they must be properly registered, inspected, and insured in Massachusetts. Marijuana may not be visible from outside the vehicle, and it must be transported in a secure, locked storage compartment. Each vehicle must have a global positioning system, and any agent transporting marijuana must have access to a secure form of communication with the originating location.

 

Massachusetts CCC Inspections

 

The CCC or its agents may inspect a marijuana establishment and affiliated vehicles at any time without prior notice in order to determine compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. All areas of a marijuana establishment, all marijuana establishment agents and activities, and all records are subject to such inspection. Marijuana establishments must immediately upon request make available to the Commission all information that may be relevant to a CCC inspection, or an investigation of any incident or complaint. A marijuana establishment must make all reasonable efforts to facilitate the CCC's inspection, or investigation of any incident or complaint, including the taking of samples, photographs, video or other recordings by the CCC or its agents, and to facilitate the CCC's interviews of marijuana establishment agents. During an inspection, the CCC may direct a Marijuana Establishment to test marijuana for contaminants as specified by the CCC, including but not limited to mold, mildew, heavy metals, plant-growth regulators, and the presence of pesticides not approved for use on marijuana by the Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources.

 

Moreover, the CCC is authorized to conduct a secret shopper program to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.

 

U.S. Attorney Statements in Massachusetts

 

On July 10, 2018, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, Andrew Lelling, issued a statement regarding the legalization of adult-use marijuana in Massachusetts. Mr. Lelling stated that since he has a constitutional obligation to enforce the laws passed by Congress, he would not immunize the residents of Massachusetts from federal law enforcement. He did state, however, that his office’s resources would be primarily focused on combating the opioid epidemic. He stated that considering those factors and the experiences of other states that have legalized adult-use marijuana, his office’s enforcement efforts would focus on the areas of (i) overproduction, (ii) targeted sales to minors and (iii) organized crime and interstate transportation of drug proceeds.

 

To the knowledge of management of the Company, other than as disclosed in this Prospectus, there have not been any statements or guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in Massachusetts. See “Risk Factors - The Company’s Business Activities are Illegal under U.S. Federal Law.”

 

Michigan

 

Michigan Legislative History

 

In 2008, the Michigan Compassionate Care Initiative established a medical cannabis program for serious and terminally ill patients. This program, which was approved by the House but not acted upon, defaulted to a public initiative on the November ballot. Proposal 1 was approved by 63% of voters on November 8, 2008. Proposal 1 was then written into law and approved by Michigan’s lawmakers in December 2008. The resulting Act became the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (“MMMA”).

 

In 2016, the Michigan legislature passed two new acts and also amended the original MMMA. The first act, amended effective January 1, 2019, established a licensing and regulation framework for medical marihuana growers, processors, secure transporters, provisioning centers, and safety compliance facilities. The second act established a “seed-to-sale” system to track marihuana that is grown, processed, transferred, stored, or disposed of under the Medical Marihuana Facilities Licensing Act.

 

The passage of the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (“MRTMA”) by voter initiative on November 6, 2018, made Michigan the tenth state to legalize the recreational use of marijuana. On December 1st, 2019, adult-use cannabis sales commenced. On June 22, 2020, the Marijuana Regulatory Agency promulgated administrative rules governing medical and adult-use cannabis licensing.

 

109

 

 

The Marijuana Regulatory Agency is responsible for the oversight of medical and adult-use cannabis in Michigan and consists of the Licensing Division, the Enforcement Division and the Michigan Medical Marihuana Program Division. The MMMA provides access to state residents to cannabis and cannabis related products under one of 11 debilitating conditions, including epilepsy, cancer, HIV/AIDS, cancer and post-traumatic stress disorder. In July 2018, the Licensing Division approved 11 additional conditions to the list of aliments to qualify for medical cannabis. The additional 11 include chronic pain, colitis and spinal cord injury.

 

Michigan Licenses

 

HSCP’s subsidiaries have secured real estate assets in strategic locations, including in Detroit, Bay City, and Battle Creek. Kevin Michigan, LLC (“Kevin Michigan”), which is not affiliated with any HSCP entity, has secured municipal approval for medical marijuana dispensaries in Detroit, Bay City, and Battle Creek, and has a state operating license for its Detroit medical marijuana dispensary. HSCP’s subsidiaries lease real estate to Kevin Michigan, provide consulting services to Kevin Michigan with respect to its Detroit facility, and sublicense certain intellectual property to Kevin Michigan. We currently have no operations in Michigan.

 

U.S. Attorney Statements in Michigan

 

On November 8, 2018, United States Attorneys Matthew Schneider and Andrew Birge for the Eastern and Western Districts of Michigan, respectively, issued a joint statement regarding the legalization of adult-use marijuana in Michigan. They stated that since they had taken oaths to protect and defend the Constitution and the laws of the United States, they would not immunize the residents of Michigan from federal law enforcement. They stated that they would continue to the investigation and prosecution of marijuana crimes as they do with any other crime. They stated they would consider the federal law enforcement priorities set by the DOJ, the seriousness of the crime, the deterrent effect of prosecution, and the cumulative impact of the crime on a community, while also considering their ability to prosecute with limited resources. They stated that combating illegal drugs was just one of many priorities, and that even within the area of drugs, they were focused on combating the opioid epidemic. They stated that they have not focused on prosecution of low-level offenders, which they stated would not change (unless aggravating factors were present). They did state that certain crimes involving marijuana could pose serious risks and harm to a community, including interstate trafficking, involvement of other illegal drugs or activity, persons with criminal records, presence of firearms or violence, criminal enterprises, gangs and cartels, bypassing local laws and regulations, potential for environmental contamination, risks to minors, and cultivation on federal property.

 

To the knowledge of management of the Company, other than as disclosed in this Prospectus, there have not been any statements or guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in Michigan. See “Risk Factors - The Company’s Business Activities are Illegal under U.S. Federal Law”.

 

New Hampshire

 

New Hampshire Legislative history

 

New Hampshire’s Therapeutic Cannabis Program (the “NH Program”) was enacted on July 23, 2013, when the New Hampshire governor signed House Bill 573 into law allowing New Hampshire residents with qualifying medical conditions to use cannabis for medical purposes. Among the 18 qualifying medical conditions included in HB 573 are cancer, HIV/AIDS, ALS and Crohn’s disease. On June 28, 2017, the New Hampshire governor signed HB 160 which added post-traumatic stress disorder and other medical conditions to the law. On January 8, 2020 the New Hampshire House voted to add insomnia and opioid use disorder to the list of qualifying conditions, though the opioid use disorder carries significant restrictions. The New Hampshire legislature placed the responsibility for administering the NH Program within the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services (the “DHHS”). The first New Hampshire dispensary began serving patients on April 30, 2016. On July 18, 2017, the governor of New Hampshire signed into law HB 640, a cannabis decriminalization bill. Under HB 640, effective September 16, 2017, penalties for non-registered and non-medical possession of three-quarters of an ounce or less of cannabis were reduced from a criminal misdemeanor to a civil violation punishable only by a fine. As of June 2019, approximately 8,302 patients have been registered to purchase medical cannabis products in New Hampshire.

 

110

 

 

New Hampshire Licenses

 

The DHHS oversees the issuance of licenses and the rules and regulations for cannabis businesses, known as Alternative Treatment Centers (each, an “ATC”). ATCs are not-for-profit entities registered under the New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated Section 126-X:7. ATCs are business entities that acquire, possess, cultivate, manufacture, deliver, transfer, transport, sell, supply, and dispense cannabis and related materials to qualified patients and other ATCs. ATCs are issued a notice of registration approval only after the DHHS has inspected and determined that the ATC is in full compliance with all regulatory and statute requirements. DHHS has issued licenses to four qualifying ATCs and in March 2018 lawmakers passed legislation calling for two additional dispensaries.

 

The table below lists the license issued to Prime Alternative Treatment Centers of NH, Inc. (“PATC”), an entity that has a management services agreement with Prime Alternative Treatment Center Consulting, LLC, a subsidiary of the Company; Prime Alternative Treatment Center Consulting, LLC does not own or control PATC:

 

MSA Party License Number City Expiration
Date
Description
Prime Alternative Treatment Centers of NH, Inc. ATC-001 Merrimack 6/30/2021 Grow / Manufacturing and Dispensary

 

ATC grower, processing, and dispensary licenses are valid for one year and expire on June 30th of the following year. License holders are required to submit a renewal application at least 120 days prior to the expiration of the current registration and include updates to the ATC’s original application as appropriate. Additionally, ATCs must ensure that no cannabis is transported outside of the state. The cultivation and processing facility is located in Peterborough, NH and the dispensary is located in Merrimack, NH.

 

New Hampshire Record-keeping/Reporting

 

New Hampshire selected BioTrackTHC as the T&T system for commercial cannabis activity. PATC currently uses a BioTrackTHC that pushes the data to New Hampshire’s T&T system to meet all reporting requirements.

 

Each ATC is required to maintain records in accordance with the records retention schedule established by the DHHS. As part of the records retention schedule, ATCs must keep a record of each transaction including the amount of cannabis dispensed, the amount paid, and the registry identification number of the qualifying patient, designated caregiver, or ATC and the qualifying patient’s provider. ATC’s are required to submit annual reports to the state that include (a) a description of efforts to educate qualifying patients and designated caregivers, (b) the annual financial report of the ATC including expenditures, liabilities, monetary reserves, and revenues received for sales of cannabis by strain and by type, (c) the total number of qualifying patients and designated caregivers served, and (d) reports on security issues including an aggregate account of all reportable incidents. Additionally, ATCs must maintain current and accurate records for each qualifying patient and designated caregiver registered with the ATC. The NH Program mandates all records be kept for a minimum of four years.

 

New Hampshire Inventory/Storage

 

Comprehensive inventory procedures and controls are required to be established and followed under the NH Program. Regular inventory counts and reviews designed to enable timely detection of any diversion, theft, or loss are specifically required by the NH Program. As part of the comprehensive inventory plan, ATCs must reconcile daily all on-premises and in-transit cannabis and be able to present such inventory records for review upon request of the state. In addition to daily inventories, monthly inventories are also mandated and must record all cannabis available for dispensing, mature cannabis plants, and seedlings at each authorized location.

 

Comprehensive storage guidelines are detailed under the NH Program. All cannabis and cannabis infused products, whether in the process of cultivation, processing, transport, testing, or available for sale, must be securely stored to prevent diversion, theft or loss. Additionally, cannabis must only be accessible by ATC agents who are specifically authorized to handle cannabis and to whom access is essential for efficient ATC operation. At the end of each business day, any cannabis or cannabis infused products must be returned to a secure storage location. Similarly, after cultivation and/or processing, all cannabis must be securely stored.

 

New Hampshire Security

 

Protecting dispensary facility patients, employees, and safeguarding cannabis against theft are all goals of the NH Program. ATCs are required to have security systems designed to prevent and detect diversion, theft, or loss of cannabis as well as unauthorized intrusion. Such security systems must include: (a) a perimeter alarm at all entry points and perimeter windows, and (b) a duress, panic, and holdup alarm connected to local public safety or law enforcement authorities or to an alarm monitoring company. Additionally, two agents must be present at the premises during all hours of operations.

 

111

 

 

Like dispensary facilities, security of cultivation facilities is also highly regulated under the NH Program. All phases of cannabis cultivation are required to take place in specially designated, secure, limited access areas that are monitored by surveillance camera systems. Surveillance cameras must cover all points of facility entry and exit, the parking lot, the entrance to the video surveillance room, and any areas that may contain cannabis. Surveillance video must be active 24 hours a day, seven days a week and all recordings must be retained for at least 90 calendar days. The NH Program mandates that all security equipment be maintained in good working order and shall be inspected and tested at regular intervals of at no more than 30 calendar days.

 

New Hampshire Transportation

 

ATCs must create transport manifests for each transportation event, which must include pertinent information including departure date and time, identifying information and license number of the originating ATC, identifying information of the destination entity, product type and quantity, estimated time of arrival and name of employee transporting the product. The originating ATC must transmit a copy of the manifest to the destination entity prior to transport. The manifest must be signed and dated upon departure and arrival.

 

All cannabis must be tracked as inventory and must be transported in containers so as to not be visible or recognizable from outside the vehicle. The vehicle must not be marked as transporting cannabis nor bear the name of the ATC. Vehicles must not remain unattended at any time.

 

New Hampshire Inspections

 

Alternative treatment centers shall be subject to inspection by the DHHS at any time. During an inspection, the department may review the alternative treatment center's records, including its confidential dispensing and data collection records, which shall track transactions and product effectiveness according to qualifying patients' registry identification numbers to protect their confidentiality.

 

U.S. Attorney Statements in New Hampshire

 

To the knowledge of management of the Company, other than as disclosed in this Prospectus, there have not been any statements or guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in New Hampshire. See “Risk Factors - The Company’s Business Activities are Illegal under U.S. Federal Law”.

 

New Jersey

 

New Jersey Legislative history

 

On January 18, 2010, the governor of New Jersey signed into law S.119, the Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act (the “NJ Act”), permitting the use of medical cannabis for persons with debilitating conditions including cancer, HIV/AIDS, ALS, Crohn’s disease and any terminal illness. The law permits the New Jersey Department of Health (“NJDH”) to create rules to add other illnesses to the permitted conditions. The NJ Law does not permit patients to grow their own cannabis but rather mandates that cannabis must be acquired through ATCs licensed by the State.

 

Caregivers for patients are permitted to collect cannabis on behalf of the patient. Under the NJ Act, six ATCs received licenses from the State. The ATCs are non-profit entities and have the exclusive right to produce and sell medical cannabis in New Jersey.

 

On March 27, 2018 through executive order No. 6 (2018), Governor Phil Murphy expanded the medical cannabis program, announcing the 20-plus recommendations presented by the NJDH on March 23, 2018. The NJDH’s recommendations and next steps included certain measures that took effect immediately (e.g. the addition of debilitating conditions and the reduction of registration fees) and other recommendations (e.g. the home delivery model) that require further regulatory or statutory enactment.

 

In February 2019, the NJDH amended the list of debilitating conditions to include opioid use disorder, which had been accepted as petition by the review panel. The NJDH also implemented measures to streamline the enrollment process for patients, allow physicians to opt out of being listed publicly, and have started the permitting process for six new ATCs.

 

In the 2020 general election, New Jersey residents voted two-to-one in favor of recreational cannabis legalization. The state has to pass legalization and decriminalization bills, which will then get signed into law by Governor Phil Murphy. Once that happens, the state’s Cannabis Regulatory Commission (CRC) will be fully appointed, and that five-person body must issue regulations within six (6) months of the effective date of the law for every part of the industry — from growing to distribution.

 

112

 

 

New Jersey Licenses

 

The NJDH is responsible for administering the NJ Act to ensure qualifying patients’ access to safe cannabis for medical use in New Jersey. The NJDH is responsible for issuing permits to entities who will operate an ATC. New Jersey is a vertical state where the dispensary needs to be in the same location as the growing and processing facilities. One of the recommendations in executive order No. 6 is to allow existing license holders to have up to two additional dispensaries not attached to the growing facility. The NJDH has issued twelve permits. The NJDH previously accepted applications for an additional six vertical permits. The NJDH is seeking new applicants to operate up to 24 additional Alternative Treatment Centers (ATCs): Up to 8 in the northern region of the state, up to 8 in the central region, up to 7 in the southern region, and up to 1 “at-large” to be determined during the award process.

 

ATC permits expire annually on December 31. A permit renewal application must be submitted at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. An ATC that seeks to renew its permit shall submit to the permitting authority an application for renewal with all required documentation and the required fees. An ATC shall update and ensure the correctness of all information submitted in previous applications for a permit or otherwise on file with the NJDH. Prior to the issuance of any permit, every principal officer, owner, director and board member of an ATC must certify stating that he or she submits to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New Jersey and agrees to comply with all the requirements of the laws of New Jersey pertaining to New Jersey’s Medicinal Marijuana Program. Failure to provide correct and current up-to-date information is grounds for denial of the application for renewal of the permit.

 

As of January 2021, approximately 101,496 patients were registered and have medical licenses allowing them to purchase cannabis products from an ATC.

 

Compassionate Care Foundation, Inc. (“CCF”) is a vertically integrated medical cannabis operator in New Jersey with licenses to conduct growing, processing, wholesale, and dispensary operations.in Egg Harbor, New Jersey. On October 4, 2013, the New Jersey Department of Health issued CCF a license to operate its facilities. The license has been renewed without issue. On June 26, 2020 we closed on the purchase of CCF and it is currently a wholly-owned subsidiary.

 

The table below lists the permit issued to CCF:

 

MSA Party Permit Number City Expiration Date Description
CCF 10042013 Egg Harbor 12/31/2021 Cultivate and Dispense
CCF 10042013 Atlantic City 12/31/2021 Dispense

 

New Jersey Record-keeping/Reporting

 

New Jersey does not have a unified T&T system. All information is forwarded to the MMMP through email. The ATC collects and submits to the NJDH for each calendar year statistical data on (a) the number of registered qualified patients and registered primary caregivers, (b) the debilitating medical conditions of the qualified patients, (c) patient demographic data, (d) summary of the patient surveys and evaluation of services and (e) other information as the NJDH may require. The ATC must retain records for at least two years.

 

New Jersey Inventory/Storage

 

The ATC will establish inventory controls and procedures for the conduct of inventory reviews and comprehensive inventories of cultivating, stored, usable and unusable cannabis. The ATC will conduct a monthly inventory of cultivating, stored, usable and unusable cannabis. Through a unified T&T system is not currently in place, an ATC is required to have a T&T system for tracking inventory and dispensing cannabis products to patients. CCF uses BioTrackTHC as its T&T system. An ATC is authorized to possess two ounces of usable cannabis per registered qualifying patient plus an additional supply, not to exceed the amount needed to enable the alternative treatment center to meet the demand of newly registered qualifying patients.

 

Per regulatory requirements an ATC, at a minimum, must (a) establish inventory controls and procedures for the conduct of inventory reviews and comprehensive inventories of cultivating, stored, usable and unusable cannabis, (b) conduct a monthly inventory of cultivating, stored, usable and unusable cannabis, (c) perform a comprehensive inventory inspection at least once every year from the date of the previous comprehensive inventory, and (d) promptly transcribe inventories taken by use of an oral recording device. If cannabis is disposed of, the ATC must maintain a written record of the date, the quantity disposed of, the manner of disposal and the persons present during the disposal, with their signatures. ATCs must keep disposal records for at least two years. Results of the inventory inspection should document the date of the inventory review, a summary of the inventory findings and the name, signature and title of the individuals who conducted the inventory inspection.

 

113

 

 

An ATC shall limit access to medicinal cannabis storage areas to the absolute minimum number of specifically authorized employees. In the event non-employee maintenance personnel, business guests or visitors to be present in or pass through medical cannabis storage areas, the ATC must have a dedicated person who is specifically authorized by policy or job description to supervise the activity. The ATC must ensure that the storage of usable cannabis prepared for dispensing to patients is in a locked area with adequate security.

 

New Jersey Security

 

An ATC is required to implement effective controls and procedures to guard against theft and diversion of cannabis including systems to protect against electronic records tampering. At a minimum, every ATC must (a) install, maintain in good working order and operate a safety and security alarm system that provides suitable protection 24 hours a day, seven days a week against theft and diversion, (b) immediately notify the state or local police agencies of an unauthorized breach of security. An ATC must conduct maintenance inspections and tests of the security alarm system at intervals not to exceed 30 days from the previous inspection.

 

A video surveillance system must be installed and operated to clearly monitor all critical control activities of the ATC and must operate in good working order at all times. The ATC must provide two monitors for remote viewing via telephone lines to the NJDH offices. This security system must be approved by State of New Jersey’s Medicinal Marijuana Program prior to permit issuance. The original tapes or digital pictures produced by the system must be stored in a safe place for a minimum of 30 days.

 

New Jersey Transportation

 

An ATC that is authorized by permit to cultivate medicinal marijuana at one location and to dispense it at a second location shall transport only usable marijuana from the cultivation site to the dispensing site according to a delivery plan submitted to the Department. Each vehicle must be staffed with at least two registered ATC employees. At least one delivery team member shall remain with the vehicle at all times that the vehicle contains medicinal marijuana. Each delivery team member shall have access to a secure form of communication with the ATC, such as a cellular telephone, at all times that the vehicle contains medicinal marijuana. Each delivery team member must possess their ATC employee identification card at all times and shall produce it to NJDH staff or law enforcement officials upon demand.

 

Each transport vehicle needs to be equipped with a secure lockbox or locking cargo area, which shall be used for the sanitary and secure transport of medicinal marijuana. Each ATC must maintain current commercial automobile liability insurance on each vehicle used for transport of medicinal marijuana in the amount of one million dollars per incident. Each ATC must ensure that vehicles used to transport medicinal marijuana bear no markings that would either identify or indicate that the vehicle is used to transport medicinal marijuana, and each trip must be completed in a timely and efficient manner, without intervening stops or delays. Each ATC shall maintain a record of each transport of medicinal marijuana in a transport logbook, which must include dates and times of trips, names of employees on the delivery team, relevant facts about the products transported and the signatures of the delivery team.

 

ATCs must report any vehicle accidents, diversions, losses, or other reportable events that occur during transport to the permitting authority in accordance with New Jersey law.

 

Home delivery is not permitted under New Jersey law. An ATC may not deliver marijuana to the home or residence of a registered qualifying patient or primary caregiver.

 

New Jersey Inspections

 

An ATC is subject to onsite assessment by the NJDH at any time. The NJDH may enter an ATC without notice to carry out an onsite assessment in accordance New Jersey laws and regulations. All ATCs are required to provide the NJDH or the NJDH’s designee immediate access to any material and information so requested. Submission of an application for an ATC permit constitutes permission for entry and onsite assessment of an ATC, and failure to cooperate with an onsite assessment and or to provide the NJDH access to the premises or information may be grounds to revoke the permit of the ATC and to refer the matter to state law enforcement agencies.

 

114

 

 

An onsite assessment may include (1) the review of all ATC documents and records and conferences with qualifying patients and primary caregivers and other persons with information, and the making and retaining of copies and/or extracts, (2) the use of any computer system at the ATC to examine electronic data, (3) the reproduction and retention of any document and/or electronic data in the form of a printout or other output, (4) the examination and collection of samples of any marijuana found at the ATC, and (5) the seizure and detention of any marijuana or thing believed to contain marijuana found at the ATC.

 

U.S. Attorney Statements in New Jersey

 

To the knowledge of management of the Company, other than as disclosed in this Prospectus, there have not been any statements or guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in New Jersey. See “Risk Factors - The Company’s Business Activities are Illegal under U.S. Federal Law”.

 

New York

 

New York Legislative history

 

In July 2014, the New York Legislature and Governor enacted the Compassionate Care Act (the “CCA”) to provide a comprehensive, safe and effective medical cannabis program. The CCA bill which is part of the Title V-A in Article 33, Title 10, Chapter 13 of the Public Health Law is scheduled to sunset in seven (7) years, in 2021. The CCA provides access to the program to those who suffer from one of 31 qualifying serious conditions including, debilitating or life-threatening conditions including cancer, HIV/AIDS, ALS and chronic pain. Patients must also have one of the following associated or complicating conditions: cachexia or wasting syndrome, severe or chronic pain, severe nausea, seizures, or severe or persistent muscle spasms.

 

Pursuant to the CCA, only a limited number of product offerings are allowed including metered liquid or oil preparations, solid and semi-solid preparations (e.g. capsules, chewable and effervescent tablets), metered ground plant preparations, and topical forms and transdermal patches. Medical cannabis may not be incorporated into the food products unless approved by the Commissioner of Health and smoking of cannabis flower is prohibited.

 

As of March 30, 2021, New York passed an adult-use bill which created an Office of Cannabis Management to oversee New York’s recreational, medical and agricultural cannabis markets. It sets a 9 percent sales tax on cannabis, an additional 4 percent tax split between the county and municipalities, plus another tax based on THC content of $0.50 per milligram for flower, $0.80 per milligram for concentrated cannabis and $0.30 per milligram for edibles. Forty percent of excess revenue from sales will be dedicated to reinvestment in communities disproportionately affected by the state’s drug laws, 40% towards public education and 20% used toward drug treatment, prevention, and education. Recreational use is for adults 21 or older. It is intended for cities, towns, and villages to have the ability to opt-out of having adult-use dispensaries and consumption sites in their communities.

 

The legislation also allows for limited home grow of three mature and three immature plants, includes equity programs to ensure broad opportunities for participation in the new industry, ends penalties for possession of less than three ounces of cannabis, and calls for automatic expungement of records for people with previous convictions for activities that are no longer criminalized. And it sets a new range of criminal penalties for unlawful possession and sale of cannabis, as well as incorporates impairment by cannabis into the infraction of driving while ability impaired.

 

New York Licenses

 

The New York Department of Health (“NYDOH”) has issued licenses to ten registered organizations which hold vertically integrated licenses. Each registered organization has one cultivation/processing license and four dispensary licenses.

 

As of September 1, 2020, there were 124,718 certified patients allowed to purchase cannabis products from a dispensary.

 

115

 

 

The table below lists the licenses approved to be issued to NYCANNA, LLC (“NYCANNA”), an indirect subsidiary of the Company:

 

Subsidiary License number City Expiration Date Description
NYCANNA, LLC MM0601M Dewitt 7/31/2021 Acquiring possession, sale, transporting, distributing and dispensing medical marijuana
NYCANNA, LLC MM0602D Jamaica 7/31/2021 Acquiring possession, sale, transporting, distributing and dispensing medical marijuana
NYCANNA, LLC MM0603D Farmingdale 7/31/2021 Acquiring possession, sale, transporting, distributing and dispensing medical marijuana
NYCANNA, LLC MM0604D Buffalo 7/31/2021 Acquiring possession, sale, transporting, distributing and dispensing medical marijuana
NYCANNA, LLC MM0605D Wallkill 7/31/2021 Acquiring possession, sale, transporting, distributing and dispensing medical marijuana

 

The New York dispensary, growing and processing licenses are valid for two years from the date of issuance and the license holders are required to submit a renewal application not be more than six months nor less than four months prior to expiration. License holders must ensure that no cannabis is sold, delivered, transported or distributed by a producer from or to a location outside of New York.

 

New York Record-keeping/Reporting

 

The NYDOH uses the BioTrack THC T&T system used to track commercial cannabis activity. NYCANNA also uses BioTrack THC to push the data to the NYDOH to meet all reporting requirements. Each month, each registered organization is required to file reports with the NYDOH which provides information showing all products dispensed during the month. All other data shall be pulled from the T&T system. The data must include (a) documentation, including lot numbers where applicable, of all materials used in the manufacturing of the approved medical cannabis product to allow tracking of the materials including but not limited to soil, soil amendment, nutrients, hydroponic materials, fertilizers, growth promoters, pesticides, fungicides, and herbicides, (b) cultivation, manufacturing, packaging and labeling production records, and (c) laboratory testing results. The records are required to be maintained for a period of five years.

 

New York Inventory/Storage

 

A record of all approved medical cannabis products that have been dispensed must be filed with the NYDOH electronically through BioTrack THC no later than 24 hours after the cannabis was dispensed to the certified patient or designated caregiver. The information filed must include (a) a serial number for each approved medical cannabis product dispensed to the certified patient or designated caregiver, (b) an identification number for the registered organization’s dispensing facility, (c) the patient’s name, date of birth and gender, (d) the patient’s address, including street, city, state and zip code, and (e) the patient’s registry identification card number.

 

All cannabis that is not part of a finished product must be stored in a secure area or location within the registered organization accessible only to a minimum number of employees essential for efficient operation and in such a manner as approved by the NYDOH in advance, to prevent diversion, theft or loss and against physical, chemical and microbial contamination and deterioration. Cannabis must be returned to its secure location immediately after completion of manufacture, distribution, transfer or analysis.

 

New York Security

 

All facilities operated by a registered organization, including any manufacturing facility and dispensing facility, must have a security system to prevent and detect diversion, theft or loss of cannabis and/or medical cannabis products, utilizing commercial grade equipment which include (a) a perimeter alarm, (b) a duress alarm, (c) a panic alarm, and (d) a holdup alarm.

 

The manufacturing and dispensing facilities must direct cameras at all approved safes, approved vaults, dispensing areas, cannabis sales areas and any other area where cannabis is manufactured, stored, handled, dispensed or disposed of. The manufacturing and dispensing facilities must angle the cameras to allow for the capture of clear and certain identification of any person entering or exiting the facilities. The surveillance cameras must record 24 hours, seven days a week. Recordings from all video cameras must be readily available for immediate viewing by a state authorized representative upon request and must be retained for at least 90 days. A registered organization must test the security and surveillance equipment no less than semi-annually at each manufacturing and dispensing facility that is operated under the registered organization’s registration. Records of security tests must be maintained for five years.

 

116

 

 

New York Transportation

 

Cannabis products must be transported in a locked storage compartment that is part of the vehicle transporting the cannabis and in a storage compartment that is not visible from outside the vehicle. An employee of a registered organization, when transporting approved medical cannabis products must (a) travel directly to his or her destination(s) and may not make any unnecessary stops in between, (b) ensure that all approved medical cannabis product delivery times are randomized, (c) appoint each vehicle with a minimum of two employees where at least one transport team member remains with the vehicle at all times, (d) possess a copy of the shipping manifest at all times when transporting or delivering approved medical cannabis products, and (e) keep the manifest in a safe compartment for a minimum of five years.

 

New York Inspections

 

Medical marijuana facilities in New York must make its books, records and manufacturing and dispensing facilities available to the department or its authorized representatives for monitoring, on-site inspection, and audit purposes, including but not limited to periodic inspections and/or evaluations of facilities, methods, procedures, materials, staff and equipment to assess compliance with requirements of New York law.

 

U.S. Attorney Statements in New York

 

To the knowledge of management of the Company, other than as disclosed in this Prospectus, there have not been any statements or guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in New York. See “Risk Factors - The Company’s Business Activities are Illegal under U.S. Federal Law”.

 

Ohio

 

Ohio Legislative History

 

Effective September 8, 2016, House Bill 523 legalized the use of medical cannabis for 21 debilitating conditions as prescribed by a licensed physician. On implementation, the Ohio Medical Marijuana Control Program (“OMMCP”) will allow people with certain medical conditions including Alzheimer’s disease, HIV/AIDS, ALS, cancer, and traumatic brain injury to legally purchase medical cannabis. On July 8, 2020 Ohio Medical Board added Cachexia to the list of qualifying conditions. Though Ohio was required to implement a fully operational OMMCP by September 8, 2018 with a controlled system for cultivation, laboratory-testing, physician/patient registration and dispensing, the timeline was delayed until November 2018. Regulatory oversight is shared between three offices; (a) the Ohio Department of Commerce with respect to overseeing cultivators, processors and testing laboratories; (b) the Ohio Board of Pharmacy with respect to overseeing retail dispensaries and the registration of patients and caregivers, and (c) the State Medical Board of Ohio with respect to certifying physicians to recommend medical cannabis. The OMMCP will permit limited product types including oils, tinctures, plant materials and edibles. Adult-use and the smoking of cannabis flower are prohibited. As of December 31, 2020, there were approximately 160,000 registered patients allowed to purchase cannabis products from a dispensary.

 

Ohio Licenses

 

Prior to September 8, 2018, the Ohio Board of Pharmacy was permitted to issue up to 60 dispensary provisional licenses. After September 8, 2018, additional provisional licenses are permitted to be issued if the population, the number of patients seeking to use medical cannabis products and the availability of all forms of cannabis products support additional licenses. To be considered for approval of a provisional dispensary or a processing license, the applicant must complete all mandated requirements. To obtain a certificate of operation for a medical cannabis dispensary or processing facility, the prospective licensee must be capable of operating in accordance with Chapter 3796 of the Revised Code, the Medical Marijuana Control Program. Dispensary Certificates of operation carry two-year terms, while certificates of operation for cultivators and processors must be renewed annually.

 

117

 

 

A certificate of operation will expire on the date identified on the certificate. A licensee will receive written or electronic notice 90 days before the expiration of its certificate of operation. The licensee must submit the renewal information at least 45 days prior to the date the existing certificate expires. The information required for the license renewal includes, but is not limited to, the following: (a) a roster that includes the dispensary’s employees’ names, (b) the history of compliance with regulations, and (c) the number and severity of any violations. If a licensee’s renewal application is not filed prior to the expiration date of the certificate of operation, the certificate of operation will be suspended for a maximum of 30 days. After 30 days, if the dispensary has not successfully renewed the certificate of operation, including the payment of all applicable fees, the certificate of operations will be deemed expired. The original implementation deadline of September 8, 2018 was missed by Ohio, as noted above. Starting in January 2019, Ohio patients were able to purchase medical cannabis.

 

Greenleaf Apothecaries, LLC (“GLA”) has been issued five dispensary licenses and Greenleaf Therapeutics, LLC (“GLT”) has been issued one provisional processing license. Greenleaf Gardens, LLC (“GLG”) has been issued one provisional grow license. The Company has entered into a master service agreement with GLA, GLT and GLG. The table below lists the locations of the licenses.

 

The table below lists the licenses issued to GLA, GLT and GLG:

 

MSA Party License Number City Expiration Date Description
GLA MMD.0700044 Akron 7/31/2021 Dispensary Facility
GLA MMD.0700042 Cleveland 7/31/2021 Dispensary Facility
GLA MMD.0700004 Canton 7/31/2021 Dispensary Facility
GLA MMD.0700005 Wickliffe 7/31/2021 Dispensary Facility
GLA MMD.0700043 Columbus 7/31/2021 Dispensary Facility
GLT MMCPP00064 Middlefield 7/31/2021 Processing
GLG MMCPC00143 Middlefield 11/12/2021 Cultivation

 

GLA currently has five operational dispensaries, one in each of the cities set out in the table above. In October 2019, GLA entered into a settlement agreement with the Ohio Board of Pharmacy that provides, among other provisions, that the process of closing the acquisition of GLA will be completed 18 months following the date the final dispensary became operational, which occurred on November 8, 2019. GLT and GLG also became operational in 2020.

 

The Company is currently in discussions for finalizing the purchases of GLA, GLT and GLG.

 

Ohio Record-keeping/Reporting

 

A holder of a processing license must maintain the following records: (a) samples sent for testing, (b) disposal of products, (c) tracking of inventory, (d) form and types of medical cannabis maintained at the processing facility on a daily basis, (e) production records, including extraction, refining, manufacturing, packaging and labeling, (f) financial records, and (g) purchase invoices, bills of lading, manifests, sales records, copies of bills of sale, and any supporting documents, including the items and/or services purchased, from whom the items were purchased, and the date of purchase.

 

A holder of a dispensary license must maintain the following records: (a) confidential storage and retrieval of patient information or other medical cannabis records, (b) records of all medical cannabis received, dispensed, sold, destroyed, or used, (c) dispensary operating procedures, (d) a third-party vendor list, (e) monetary transactions, and (f) journals and ledgers. All records relating to the purchase or return, dispensing, distribution, destruction, and sale of medical cannabis must be maintained under appropriate supervision and control to restrict unauthorized access on the licensed premises for a five-year period.

 

Ohio Inventory/Storage

 

Ohio has selected METRC as the T&T system. Individual licensees, whether directly or through third-party APIs, are required to push data to the state to meet all reporting requirements. A holder of a processing license must track and submit through the inventory tracking system any information the Ohio Department of Commerce determines necessary for maintaining and tracking medical cannabis extracts and products.

 

A holder of a processing or cultivation license must conduct weekly inventory of medical cannabis which includes (a) the date of the inventory, (b) net weight of plant material and the net weight and volume of medical cannabis extract, (c) net weight and unit count of medical cannabis products prepared or packaged for sale to a dispensary, and (d) a summary of the inventory findings. On an annual basis and as a condition for renewal of a processing license, a holder of a processing license shall conduct a physical, manual inventory of plant material, medical cannabis extract, and medical cannabis products on hand at the processor and compare the findings to an annual inventory report generated using the inventory tracking system. A holder of a processing license must store plant material, medical cannabis extract, and medical cannabis product inventory on the premises in a designated, enclosed, locked area and accessible only by authorized individuals.

 

118

 

 

A holder of a dispensary license must use the METRC T&T system to push data to the Ohio Board of Pharmacy on a real-time basis. The following data must be transmitted: (a) each transaction and each day’s beginning inventory, acquisitions, sales, disposal and ending inventory, (b) acquisitions of medical cannabis from a licensed processor or cultivator holding a plant-only processor designation, (c) name and license number of the licensed dispensary employee receiving the medical cannabis and, (d) other information deemed appropriate by the Ohio State Board of Pharmacy. A dispensary’s designated representative shall conduct the inventory at least once a week. Records of each day’s beginning inventory, acquisitions, sales, disposal and ending inventory shall be kept for a period of three years.

 

The dispensary licensee must restrict access areas and keep stock of medical cannabis in secured area enclosed by a physical barrier with suitable locks and an alarm system capable of detecting entry at a time when licensed dispensary employees are not present. Medical cannabis must be stored at appropriate temperatures and under appropriate conditions to help ensure that its identity, strength, quality and purity are not adversely affected.

 

Ohio Security

 

All licensees must have a security system that remains operational at all times and that uses commercial grade equipment to prevent and detect diversion, theft or loss of medical cannabis, including (a) a perimeter alarm, (b) motion detectors, and (c) duress and panic alarms. A dispensary must also employ a holdup alarm, which means a silent alarm signal generated by the manual activation of a device intended to signal a robbery in progress.

 

Video cameras at a dispensary must be positioned at each point of egress and each point of sale. The cameras must capture the sale, the individuals and the computer monitors used for the sale. Video surveillance recording must operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Recording from all video cameras during hours of operation must be made available for immediate viewing by the Ohio State Board of Pharmacy upon request and must be retained for at least six months.

 

Video cameras at a processing or cultivation facility must be directed at all approved safes, approved vaults, cannabis sales areas, and any other area where plant material, medical cannabis extract, or medical cannabis products are being processed, stored or handled. Video surveillance must take place 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Recordings from all video cameras during hours of operation must be readily available for immediate viewing by the Ohio regulatory bodies upon request and must be retained for at least six months.

 

Ohio Transportation

 

Medical marijuana entities must maintain a transportation log containing the names and addresses of the medical marijuana entities sending and receiving the shipment, names and registration numbers of the registered employees transporting the medical marijuana or the products containing medical marijuana, the license plate number and vehicle type that will transport the shipment, the time of departure and estimated time of arrival, the specific delivery route, which includes street names and distances; and the total weight of the shipment and a description of each individual package that is part of the shipment, and the total number of individual packages. Copies of the log described above must be transmitted to the recipient and to the Ohio Department of Commerce before the close of business the day prior to the trip.

 

Vehicles transporting medical marijuana or marijuana products must be insured as required by law, store the products in locked compartments, ensure that the products are not visible from outside the vehicle, be staffed with two employees registered with the department (with one remaining with the vehicle at all times) and have access to the 911 emergency system. Vehicles must not be marked with any marks or logos.

 

Trips must be direct, other than to refuel the vehicle. Drivers must have their employee identification cards at all times and must ensure that delivery times and routes are randomized. A copy of the transportation log must be carried during the trip.

 

Ohio Inspections

 

The submission of an application that results in the issuance of a provisional license or certificate of operation for a cultivator or processor irrevocably gives the Ohio Department of Commerce consent to conduct all inspections necessary to ensure compliance with the cultivator's application, state and local law and regulators. An inspector conducting an inspection pursuant to this rule shall be accompanied by a “type 1” key employee during the inspection. The inspector may review and make copies of records, enter any area of a facility, inspect vehicles, equipment, premises, and question employees, among other actions.

 

119

 

 

Dispensaries in Ohio are subject to random and unannounced dispensary inspections and medical marijuana testing by the Ohio Board of Pharmacy. The Ohio Board of Pharmacy and its representatives may enter facilities and vehicles where medical marijuana is held and conduct inspections in a reasonable manner each place and all pertinent equipment, containers and materials and data. The Ohio Board of Pharmacy may also obtain any medical marijuana or related products from such facility.

 

U.S. Attorney Statements in Ohio

 

To the knowledge of management of the Company, other than as disclosed in this Prospectus, there have not been any statements or guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in Ohio. See “Risk Factors - United States Regulatory Uncertainty”.

 

Oregon

 

Oregon Legislative History

 

Oregon has both a medical and adult-use cannabis program. The Oregon Medical Marijuana Act (“OMM”) was established by Oregon Ballot Measure 67 in 1998 to allow for the cultivation, possession and use of cannabis by patients upon doctor recommendation. The OMM removed criminal penalties for medical cannabis for patients with debilitating medical conditions whose doctor verified the condition and determined medical cannabis may alleviate the condition. Qualifying conditions include cancer, chronic pain, glaucoma and HIV/AIDS. The Oregon Medical Marijuana Program (“OMMP”) administers the program within the Oregon Department of Human Services. Patients obtain permits through the Oregon Department of Human Services.

 

In 2014, Measure 91 was approved which legalized non-medical cultivation and uses of cannabis effective July 1, 2015. Oregon Governor Kate Brown signed an emergency bill declaring cannabis sales legal to adult-use users from commercial dispensaries effective October 1, 2015. Effective January 1, 2017, cannabis was permitted to be sold for adult-use only by businesses that obtained a recreational retailer license from the Oregon Liquor Control Commission (“OLCC”). Medical cannabis dispensaries that did not obtain a retailer license were no longer permitted to sell cannabis for adult-use after 2016. Holders of retailer licenses are permitted to sell cannabis for medical use to an OMMP patient 18 years of age or older whereas the minimum age to purchase cannabis for adult-use is 21.

 

Oregon Licenses

 

Oregon does not limit the number of retailer, grower or processing licenses The OLCC regulates all retailer, producer, processor and lab license holders who have been approved to hold adult-use licenses and all producers and retailers if they sell both medical and adult-use cannabis. The Oregon Health Administration regulates all growers and dispensaries who hold only medical licenses. To operate legally under state law, cannabis operators must obtain a state license and local approval. Applicants for each license class are subject to the respective requirements and criteria of the OLCC which include but are not limited to criminal background checks, zoning requirements, readiness inspection, and state registration.

 

The table below lists the licenses issued to Acreage’s indirect subsidiaries operating in Oregon:

 

Subsidiary License Number City Expiration Date Description
East 11th Incorporated 1004151A29E Eugene See below Dispensary Facility
22nd and Burn Inc. 100400192AC Portland See below Dispensary Facility
The Firestation 23 Inc. 1003660E75D Portland See below Dispensary Facility
HSCP Oregon, LLC 1004152E8C9 Springfield See below Dispensary Facility
HSCP Oregon, LLC 020-1003642197C Medford See below Producer License
HSCP Oregon, LLC 10026747951 Portland See below Dispensary Facility
Gesundheit Foods LLC 1013975ABC8 Milwaukie 7/18/2021 Processor
Gesundheit Foods LLC 1013984A526 Milwaukie 7/18/2021 Wholesaler

 

On January 14, 2020, each of East 11th Incorporated, 22nd and Burn Inc., The Firestation 23 Inc. and HSCP Oregon, LLC Dispensary in Springfield received a letter from the OLCC permitting these entities to continue to operate while the OLCC reviews their renewal applications. On July 28, 2020, HSCP Oregon, LLC received a letter from the OLLC permitting the producer to continue to operate while the OLCC reviews their renewal applications. On March 10, 2020, HSCP Oregon, LLC received a letter from the OLLC permitting the dispensary in Portland to continue to operate while the OLCC reviews their renewal applications.

 

120

 

 

The retailer, producer and processer licenses are valid for one year and the licensees are required to submit a renewal application at least 20 days before the date of expiration. The license holders must ensure that no cannabis is sold, delivered, transported or distributed by a producer from or to a location outside of Oregon. On June 3, 2020, Gesundheit Foods LLC requested to temporarily close its wholesaler and processor operations under regulation 845-025-1160 (c). On July 14, 2020 HSCP Oregon, LLC requested to temporarily close its Medford location producer operations under regulation 845-025-1160 (c).

 

Oregon Record-keeping/Reporting

 

Oregon uses the METRC T&T system and allows other third-party system integration via an API to track cannabis. The subsidiaries in Oregon use a third-party T&T system to push the data to the state through an API to meet all reporting requirements. All cannabis products dispensed are documented at point of sale via the T&T system. License holders must maintain the documentation from the T&T system in a secure locked location at each dispensing or growing location for three years as required by the OLCC.

 

The OLCC requires all cannabis licensees to have and maintain records that clearly reflect all financial transactions and the financial condition of the business. The following records may be kept in either paper or electronic form and must be maintained for a three year period and be made available for inspection if requested by the OLCC: (a) purchase invoices and supporting documents for items and services purchased for use in the production, processing, research, testing and sale of cannabis items that include from whom the items were purchased and the date of purchase, (b) bank statements for any accounts, (c) accounting and tax records, (d) documentation of all financial transactions, including contracts and agreements for services performed or received, and (e) all employee records, including training.

 

Oregon Inventory/Storage

 

OLCC licensees must report the following to Oregon’s Cannabis Tracking System (“CTS”) (a) a reconciliation of all on-premise and in-transit cannabis item inventories each day, (b) all information for seeds, usable cannabis, CBD concentrates and extracts by weight, (c) the wet weight of all harvested cannabis plants immediately after harvest, (d) all required information for CBD products by unit count, and (e) for retailer license holders, the price before tax and amount of each item sold to consumers and the date of each transaction. The data must be transmitted for each individual transaction before the retailer opens the next business day.

 

All cannabis items on a licensed retailer’s premises must be held in a safe or vault. All usable cannabis, cut and drying mature cannabis plants, CBD concentrates, extracts or products on the licensed premises of a licensee other than a retailer are to be kept in a locked, enclosed area within the licensed premises that is secured with at a minimum, a steel door with a steel frame or equivalent, and a commercial grade, non-residential door lock.

 

All licensees must keep all video recordings and archived required records not stored electronically in a locked storage area. Current records may be kept in a locked cupboard or desk outside the locked storage area during hours when the licensed business is open.

 

Oregon Security

 

A licensed premise must have a fully operational security alarm system, activated at all times when the licensed premises is closed for business. Among other features the security alarm system for the licensed premises must (a) be able to detect unauthorized entry onto the licensed premises and unauthorized activity within any limited access area where mature cannabis plants, usable cannabis, CBD concentrates, extracts or products are present, (b) be programmed to notify the licensee, a licensee representative or other authorized personnel in the event of an unauthorized entry, and (c) either have at least two operational “panic buttons” located inside the licensed premises that are linked with the alarm system that immediately notifies a security company or law enforcement, or have operational panic buttons physically carried by all employees present on the licensed premises that are linked with the alarm system that immediately notifies a security company or law enforcement.

 

A licensed premise must have a fully operational video surveillance recording system. Among other requirements, a licensed premise must have cameras that continuously record, 24 hours a day, seven days a week: (a) in all areas where mature cannabis plants, usable cannabis, CBD concentrates, extracts or products may be present on the licensed premises; and (b) all points of ingress and egress to and from areas where mature cannabis plants, usable cannabis, CBD concentrates, extracts or products are present. A licensee must keep all surveillance recordings for a minimum of 90 calendar days and have the surveillance room or surveillance area with limited access.

 

121

 

 

Oregon Transportation

 

Licensed producers which transport cannabis to licensed retailers must comply with the following: (a) a licensee must keep cannabis items in transit shielded from public view, (b) the cannabis items must be of secured (locked-up) during transport, (c) the transport must be equipped with an alarm system, (d) the transport must be temperature controlled if perishable cannabis items are being transported, (e) the transport must provide arrival date and estimated time of arrival information, (f) all cannabis items must be packaged in shipping containers and labeled with a unique identifier, and (g) the transport must provide a copy of the printed manifest and any printed receipts for cannabis items delivered to law enforcement officers or other representatives of a government agency if requested to do so while in transit.

 

Oregon Inspections

 

All marijuana licensees may be subject to safety inspections of licensed premises by state or local government officials to determine compliance with state or local health and safety laws. The OLCC also may conduct an inspection at any time to ensure that a registrant, licensee or permittee is in compliance with Oregon state laws. A licensee, licensee representative, or permittee must cooperate with the OLCC during an inspection. If licensee, licensee representative or permittee fails to permit the OLCC to conduct an inspection the OLCC may seek an investigative subpoena to inspect the premises and gather books, payrolls, accounts, papers, documents or records.

 

U.S. Attorney Statements in Oregon

 

To the knowledge of management of the Company, other than as disclosed in this Prospectus, there have not been any statements or guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in Oregon. See “Risk Factors - The Company’s Business Activities are Illegal under U.S. Federal Law”.

 

Pennsylvania

 

Pennsylvania Legislative History

 

The Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Program (the “PA Program”) was established by the Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Act (the “PA Act”) on April 17, 2016. The PA Program provides access to medical cannabis for qualified state residents who suffer from 23 specific medical conditions including epilepsy, chronic pain, HIV, AIDS, cancer, and post-traumatic stress disorder. To qualify under the PA Program, medical cannabis patients must both register with the Pennsylvania Department of Health (the “PADOH”) and obtain either an identification card or authorization letter from the PADOH. As of November 11, 2020, more than 425,000 patients in Pennsylvania have registered to participate in the medical marijuana program, and more than 280,000 have active identification cards and are able to purchase medical marijuana at a dispensary. On February 15, 2018, dispensaries licensed under the PA Program began selling medical cannabis to qualified patients. Pennsylvania currently allows sale of medical cannabis to qualified patients in the following forms: pill, oil, topical forms including gels, creams, or ointments, tincture, and liquids. On August 1, 2018, the Pennsylvania Health Secretary approved the sale of dry leaf cannabis.

 

Pennsylvania Permits

 

The PA Act allows the PADOH to issue up to 25 grower/processor permits and 50 dispensary permits (each dispensary permit allows the holder to open up to three separate dispensary sites). On June 29, 2017, the PADOH issued 12 cultivation/processing permits and 27 dispensary permits. Permits are granted to applicants who demonstrate, among other things: (a) the ability to implement and maintain effective security measures and controls to prevent diversion, (b) a clear criminal background free of illegal conduct, (c) compliance with municipality zoning requirements, (d) well-defined standard operating procedures, and (e) a verified diversity plan. Prior to awarding permits, the PA Program requires the PADOH to verify all applicant information including through interviews of principals, operators, financial backers, and employees engaged and to be engaged in the permit applicant’s cannabis operations.

 

On July 31, 2018, the PADOH announced it issued an additional 13 grower/processor permits and 23 dispensary permits.

 

122

 

 

The table below lists the permit issued to Prime Wellness of Pennsylvania LLC (“PWPA”), an indirect Subsidiary of the Company.

 

Subsidiary Permit City Expiration Date Description
Prime Wellness of Pennsylvania LLC GP- 1005-17 Sinking Spring 6/20/2021 Grow/Processing Facility

 

Dispensary, grower, and processing permits are valid for one year from the date of issuance and permit holders are required to submit renewal applications in accordance with the PA Act. The PADOH must renew a permit unless it determines the applicant is unlikely to maintain effective control against diversion of medical cannabis and the applicant is unlikely to comply with all laws as prescribed under the PA Act. Additionally, permit holders must ensure that no cannabis is sold, delivered, transported, or distributed outside of Pennsylvania.

 

Pennsylvania Record keeping/Reporting

 

The PA Act requires each licensed medical cannabis grower/processor or dispensary to report information to the PADOH every three months including, but not limited to, (a) the amount of medical cannabis sold by the grower/processor, (b) the total value and amounts of medical cannabis sold by the grower/processor, (c) the amount of medical cannabis purchased by each dispensary, (d) the cost and amounts of medical cannabis sold to each dispensary, and (e) the total amount and dollar value of medical cannabis sold by each dispensary.

 

To monitor reporting requirements under the PA Act, the PADOH selected MJ Freeway as the T&T system to implement a seed-to-sale electronic tracking. PWPA also uses MJ Freeway to push data and ensure compliance with all reporting requirements.

 

Pennsylvania Inventory/Storage

 

The PA Act requires each medical cannabis grower/processor maintains inventory and storage data in an electronic format through MJ Freeway. The following information is tracked to ensure a compliant cannabis business operation: (a) the number, weight, and type of seeds used, (b) the number of immature medical cannabis plants, (c) the number of mature medical cannabis plants, (d) the number of medical cannabis products ready for sale, and (d) the number of damaged, defective, expired, or contaminated seeds, immature medical cannabis plants, medical cannabis plants and medical cannabis products awaiting disposal.

 

Robust physical inventory controls and procedures are required of each medical cannabis grower/processor under the PA Act. The following procedures are mandated to ensure physical inventory counts match electronic records: (a) monthly inventory counts of both medical cannabis plants in the process of growing and medical cannabis products that are stored for future sale, (b) comprehensive inventory counts of seeds, immature medical cannabis plants and medical cannabis plants, and (c) written or electronic records created and maintained for each inventory count conducted.

 

Additionally, each medical cannabis grower/processor must separately store in locked, limited access areas all seeds, immature medical cannabis plants, medical cannabis plants and medical cannabis that is expired, damaged, deteriorated, mislabeled or contaminated.

 

Pennsylvania Security

 

The PA Act mandates each medical cannabis grower/processor must use security and surveillance systems including stringent video backup requirements to safeguard their medical cannabis and related products. Security requirements include: (a) alarm systems that cover all facility entrances, exits, areas that contain medical cannabis, safes, and the perimeter of the facility, and (b) professionally-monitored security and surveillance systems that operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and record all activity in images capable of clearly revealing facial detail. All images captured by each surveillance camera must be stored for a minimum of two (2) years in a format that may be easily accessed for investigative purposes. Furthermore, all recordings must be kept in a locked cabinet, closet or other secure place to protect them from tampering or theft.

 

The PA Act also specifies requirements for the alarm system. The alarm system must include: (a) a silent security alarm signal, (b) an audible security alarm signal generated by the manual activation of a device intended to signal a life-threatening or emergency situation requiring law enforcement response, and (c) an electrical, electronic, mechanical, or other device capable of being programmed to send a pre-recorded voice message requesting dispatch, when activated, over a telephone line, radio, or other communication system to a law enforcement, public safety, or emergency services agency.

 

Pennsylvania Transportation

 

A medical cannabis grower/processor must transport and deliver medical cannabis to a medical cannabis organization or an approved laboratory within Pennsylvania in accordance with the following: (a) deliveries must be made between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., (b) a global positioning system must be used to ensure safe and efficient delivery, (c) medical cannabis may not be visible from outside of the transport vehicle, (d) vehicles must be equipped with a secure cargo area, (e) each transport vehicle must be staffed with at least two individuals and at least one delivery team member must remain with the medical cannabis at all times, and (f) a printed or electronic transport manifest must accompany every delivery.

 

123

 

 

Pennsylvania Inspections

 

The PADOH may conduct announced or unannounced inspections or investigations to determine the medical marijuana organization’s compliance with its license and Pennsylvania laws and regulations. During an inspection or investigation, the PADOH may review the site, facility, vehicles, books, records, papers, documents, data, and other physical or electronic information. The PADOH may also question employees, officers, investors or similar persons and any other person or entity providing services to the medical marijuana organization.

 

The PADOH may also conduct an inspection of a grower/processor facility’s equipment, instruments, tools and machinery that are used to grow, process and package medical marijuana, including containers and labels. The PADOH and its authorized agents will have free access to review and, if necessary, make copies of books, records, papers, documents, data, or other physical or electronic information that relates to the business of the medical marijuana organization, including financial data, sales data, shipping data, pricing data and employee data.

 

The PADOH and its authorized agents have the right to access any area within a site or facility and are permitted to collect test samples for testing at an approved laboratory.

 

Failure of a medical marijuana organization to provide the PADOH and its authorized agents immediate access to any part of a medical marijuana organization’s site or facility, requested material, physical or electronic information, or individual as part of an inspection or investigation may result in the imposition of a civil monetary penalty, suspension or revocation of its permit, or an immediate cessation of operations pursuant to a cease and desist order issued by the PADOH.

 

U.S. Attorney Statements in Pennsylvania

 

To the knowledge of management of the Company, other than as disclosed in this Prospectus, there have not been any statements or guidance made by federal authorities or prosecutors regarding the risk of enforcement action in Pennsylvania. See “Risk Factors - United States Regulatory Uncertainty”.

 

124

 

 

PROPERTIES

 

The following table sets forth our owned and leased locations by geographic location as of December 31, 2020. The Company has entered into sale-and-leaseback transactions with GreenAcreage Real Estate Corp. and will continue to enter into such transactions with real estate investment trusts when deemed beneficial to the Company’s strategy. As a result, the Company’s real estate profile may continue to shift to leased properties.

 

The tables and footnotes below summarize the Company’s real estate profile as of December 31, 2020:

 

Regions Operational In Development Owned Leased
New England  
Connecticut 3 3
Maine(1) 3 3
Maine 1 1
Massachusetts 2 1 3
New Hampshire(1) 1 1 2
Mid-Atlantic  
New Jersey 2 1 3
New York 4 4
Midwest  
Illinois 2 2
Michigan 3 3
Ohio(1) 5 5
West  
California 1 1
Oregon 5 5
South  
Florida 1 7 8
Total 29 14 4 39

 

(1) Acreage provides services including but not limited to financing, management, consulting and/or administrative services with these license holders to assist in the operations of their cannabis businesses.

 

125

 

 

Cultivation/Processing Facilities

 

Regions Operational In Development Owned Leased
New England  
Maine(1) 1 1
Massachusetts 1 1
New Hampshire(1) 1 1
Mid-Atlantic  
New Jersey 1 1 1 1
New York 1 1
Pennsylvania 1 1
Midwest  
Illinois 1 1
Iowa(2) 1
Ohio(1) 1 1
West  
California(1) 1 1
Oregon(3) 1
South  
Florida 1 1
Total 10 1 5 8

 

(1) Acreage provides services including but not limited to financing, management, consulting and/or administrative services with these license holders to assist in the operations of their cannabis businesses.

(2) Acreage owns a property in Iowa but surrendered its license in June 2020.

(3) Acreage owns a cultivational, processing and wholesale license and leases a property in Medford, Oregon. We temporarily halted cultivation/processing operations in Oregon, in part as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

126

 

 

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

Our Articles provide that each director shall hold office until the close of our next annual general meeting, or until his or her successor is duly elected or appointed, unless his or her office is earlier vacated. Our Board currently consists of six directors, of whom three are considered to be independent persons. See “Director Independence” for details on the independence of our directors.

 

The following table sets forth our directors and executive officers and their respective positions.

 

Name   Age     Position
John Boehner     71     Director
Kevin P. Murphy     58     Director and Chairman of the Board
Douglas Maine     72     Director
Brian Mulroney     81     Director
William C. Van Faasen     72     Director
Katie J. Bayne     54     Director
Filippo “Peter” Caldini     56     Chief Executive Officer
Robert J. Daino     56     Chief Operating Officer
Steve Goertz     50     Chief Financial Officer
James A. Doherty, III     42     General Counsel and Secretary

 

Director and Executive Officer Biographies

 

John A. Boehner, Director: John A. Boehner is a former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives. Mr. Boehner served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1991 to October 2015 and served as Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives from January 2011 to October 2015. Prior to entering public service, Speaker Boehner spent years running a small business representing manufacturers in the packaging and plastics industry. He championed a number of major reform projects as a Member of Congress. During his nearly five years as Speaker, Mr. Boehner developed a reputation for bringing Republicans and Democrats together in support of major policy initiatives. Mr. Boehner’s business experience and extensive service and leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives, and his insight into public policy, governmental relations and regulatory matters qualify him to serve on our Board.

 

Kevin P. Murphy, Director: Kevin P. Murphy is currently Chairman of the Board and has served in such capacity since November 2018. Mr. Murphy was previously the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Prior to serving in this role, Mr. Murphy served as Founder and Chief Executive Officer of High Street (which was founded in 2014). Prior to his role at High Street, Mr. Murphy was most recently a Founding Member and Managing Partner of Tandem Global Partners, a boutique investment firm focused on the emerging markets. Previously Mr. Murphy was Managing Partner at Stanfield Capital Partners, where he served as a member of the Operating and Management team that oversaw all aspects of Stanfield’s business, including risk management, sales and distribution, client services, legal, compliance and operations. Mr. Murphy also previously worked at Gleacher NatWest (Partner and Dir. of Marketing), Schroders (Sr. VP of Sales), Lazard Freres (VP) and Cantor Fitzgerald (VP). Mr. Murphy graduated with a B.A. from Holy Cross College. Mr. Murphy’s insight into our Company from his previous role as the Chief Executive Officer and his extensive knowledge of the cannabis industry and his experiences serving in leadership positions prior to joining the Company qualify him to serve on our Board.

 

The Right Honorable Brian Mulroney, Director: Brian Mulroney is a senior partner and international business consultant for Norton Rose Fulbright, an international law firm. Prior to joining Norton Rose Fulbright, Mr. Mulroney was the eighteenth Prime Minister of Canada from 1984 to 1993 and leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada from 1983 to 1993. He served as the Executive Vice President of the Iron Ore Company of Canada and President beginning in 1977. Prior to that, Mr. Mulroney served on the Cliché Commission of Inquiry in 1974. Mr. Mulroney is the Chairman of Quebecor Inc. and serves as a director of the Blackstone Group L.P. and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation. Mr. Mulroney also serves as chairman of the International Advisory Board of Barrick Gold Corporation and is a member of the advisory group of Lion Capital LLP. Mr. Mulroney’s extensive public service as a Prime Minister of Canada, and his insight into public policy, governmental relations and regulatory matters, as well as his business experience at Iron Ore Company of Canada and his service as a director of Blackstone and Wyndham, qualify him to serve on our Board.

 

Douglas L. Maine, Director: Douglas L. Maine joined International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”), an IT services and technology company, in 1998 as Chief Financial Officer following a 20-year career with MCI (now part of Verizon) where he was Chief Financial Officer from 1992-1998. He was named General Manager, General Manager, Consumer Products Industry in 2003 and retired from IBM in 2005. Mr. Maine previously served as a director of the following public companies: Orbital-ATK, Inc. from 2006-2017, BroadSoft, Inc. from 2006-2017, Rockwood Holdings, Inc. from 2005-2015 and Albemarle from 2015-2020. Mr. Maine’s executive business and financial management experience at MCI and IBM, as well as his experience as a director of multiple other public companies, qualify him to serve on our Board.

 

127

 

 

William C. Van Faasen, Director: William C. Van Faasen served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company from June- December 2020. Prior to that role, Mr. Van Faasen was Chairman of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, a state licensed private health insurance company under the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, from 2002 to 2007, interim President and Chief Executive Officer from March 2010 to September 2010 and Chair of the Board of Directors from September 2010 to March 2014 when he was named, and currently serves as, Chair Emeritus. Mr. Van Faasen joined Blue Cross in 1990 as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and served as President from 1992 to 2004 and Chief Executive Officer from 1992 to 2005. Mr. Van Faasen has served in operational, marketing, and health care capacities for over 20 years and has been engaged in numerous civic and community activities, including Chair of the Initiative for a New Economy, Chair of Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce and Chair of United Way Massachusetts Bay. Mr. Van Faasen currently serves as a board member of Eversource Energy and the lead director of Liberty Mutual Group. Previously, Mr. Van Faasen served on the boards of Boston Private Industry Council, the Boston Minuteman Council, Boy Scouts of America, the BCBSMA Foundation, BankBoston, Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, IMS Health, PolyMedica Corporation and Tier Technologies. Mr. Van Faasen’s service as chief executive and chief operating experience, and his service Chairman, at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, a private health insurance company in a highly regulated industry, qualify him to serve on our Board.

 

Katie J. Bayne, Director: Katie Bayne, is the Founder of Bayne Advisors, a strategic consulting and advising firm, Katie partners with client companies to solve complex challenges that impede progress. Ms. Bayne is also a Senior Advisor at Guggenheim Securities, working on opportunity identification and workforce development. Ms. Bayne also sits on the board of directors of the purpose-driven lifestyle brand, The Honest Company. A longtime marketing, strategy and general management leader at Coca-Cola, Katie worked in various roles of increasing responsibility, eventually becoming the Chief Marketing Officer, North America and then the President, North America Brands. Since 2003, she has served as an Independent Board Director on three public Fortune 500 companies, in the varied businesses of homebuilding and specialty retailing. Ms. Bayne has a BA and an MBA from Duke University and is a member of the Board of Visitors at Duke’s Fuqua School of Business. Ms. Bayne’s experience as Chief Marketing Officer, North America of Coca-Cola, as well as her experience as an advisor and director of multiple other public companies, qualify her to serve on our Board.

 

Filippo “Peter” Caldini, Chief Executive Officer: Peter Caldini joined Acreage Holdings in December 2020 as Chief Executive Officer after serving for 18 months as the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Bespoke Capital Acquisition Corp., a cannabis-focused Special Purpose Acquisition Corporation. Mr. Caldini has over 30 years of experience building and restructuring multinational organizations around the world, with a strong emphasis in consumer healthcare and consumer packaged goods. Mr. Caldini developed extensive commercial management expertise in heavily regulated industries while at Pfizer Inc., Bayer AG and Wyeth, LLC. Mr. Caldini was the Regional President North America for Pfizer Consumer Healthcare from 2017 to 2019, where he drove brand acceleration, marketing strategy, trade execution, global e-commerce and more for the second largest OTC consumer healthcare company in the region with over U.S. $2.1 billion in net sales. Prior to that role he was the Regional President EMEA of Pfizer Consumer Healthcare from 2016 to 2017 and led the Northern European cluster from 2015 to 2016. Mr. Caldini was at Bayer from 2009 to 2014, with roles including the head of sub-region Emerging Markets EMEA, the General Manager of Bayer Consumer Care China and the head of the Nutritionals Strategic Business unit, the global leader in nutritional supplements with brands One-A-Day, Berocca, and Supradyn. From 2002 to 2009 Mr. Caldini was at Wyeth LLC where he was responsible for affiliates across LATAM and AsiaPac and also managed the Centrum brand globally. Mr. Caldini has a Masters of International Economics and Management from Bocconi University in Milan, Italy, an MBA from Northeastern University and a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Boston University.

 

Robert J. Daino, Chief Operating Officer: Robert Daino has a proven track record of success in driving an entrepreneurial spirit into both newly created and established organizations resulting in significant growth. As an investor, advisor and eventually the CEO of Terradiol, Mr. Daino helped lead the organization through an ownership transition. Prior to Terradiol, Mr. Daino was the President & CEO of WCNY Public Media where he transformed the station into a national leader, with a unique business model, gaining public engagement from all fifty states and 17 countries. In addition, Mr. Daino created the first of its kind central casting outsourcing service which has transformed public broadcasting in the United States. As the President & CEO of Promergent, Mr. Daino built a highly successful and profitable business. Mr. Daino is a leader in providing process, change and document management software and services. Throughout his 13-year career at General Electric, Mr. Daino held a host of technical and senior management roles across the organization, leading change, growth, and top company performance

 

128

 

 

Steve Goertz, Chief Financial Officer: Steve Goertz brings more than 25 years of finance, capital markets and strategic planning experience at a variety of industries that are complimentary to the Chief Financial Officer role at Acreage. Previously Mr. Goertz served as Chief Financial Officer of sgsco, a private equity owned global marketing services organization where he led the restructuring of the finance function and participated in the rationalization of an organization built through acquisitions. Prior to that, Mr. Goertz was the Chief Financial Officer of goeasy Ltd., a TSX-listed consumer finance company, where he co-led the transformation of the business from a hard goods retailer to a leading non-bank financial services organization. In this role, he was also responsible for the development of systems and the establishment of a risk management discipline and successfully transformed the capital structure through a series of equity and debt offering. Mr. Goertz also served in various finance and accounting roles at Sobeys, Maple Leaf Foods, and Deloitte. Prior to joining Acreage, Mr. Goertz gained considerable cannabis capital markets experience having spent the past 14 months working with Bespoke Capital Acquisition Corp, a special purpose acquisition corporation, focused on the cannabis industry in the U.S. and globally.

 

James A. Doherty, III, General Counsel and Secretary: James Doherty has been recognized as a Rising Star of Young Attorneys for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania by Philadelphia Magazine. Mr. Doherty routinely represents a variety of clients in the highly regulated gaming and casino industry. His practice also has an emphasis on professional liability, civil rights, and employment and labor disputes. Mr Doherty also acts as special counsel to a number of public and municipal entities. Mr. Doherty maintains an active appellate practice, having successfully argued cases before the Superior Court, Commonwealth Court and Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Before joining Acreage, Mr. Doherty served as a law clerk for the Honorable Thomas I. Vanaskie, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and as special counsel to the Executive Director of the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board. He was a featured speaker for the Pennsylvania Gaming Law Update Continuing Legal Education and a delegate to the General Litigation Forum. Jim is also a member of the Civil Rights Committee for the Lackawanna County Bar Association.

 

Familial Relationships

 

As of December 31, 2020, there are no familial relationships among any of our officers or directors.

 

Director Independence

 

The Board is currently comprised of six members. Three of the six directors are considered to be independent under the CSA Guidelines and in accordance with National Instrument 52-110 - Audit Committees (“NI 52-110”). Under NI 52-110, an independent director is one who is free from any direct or indirect relationship which could, in the view of the Board, be reasonably expected to interfere with such director’s exercise of independent judgment. The directors of the Company who are independent are Brian Mulroney, Douglas Maine and Katie Bayne.

 

The independent directors meet for in camera sessions without non-independent directors and members of management at the end of each regular Board meeting (unless they waive such requirement).

 

Board Committees

 

Our Board currently has a Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee and an Audit Committee.

 

Audit Committee

 

The Audit Committee has access to all of the Company’s books, records, facilities and personnel and may request any information about the Company as it may deem appropriate. It also has the authority to retain and compensate special legal, accounting, financial and other consultants or advisors to advise the Audit Committee, and is responsible for the pre-approval of all non-audit services to be provided by our auditors.

 

The Audit Committee met nine times during 2020. The Audit Committee is currently comprised of three members: Douglas Maine (Chair), Katie Bayne, and William Van Faasen. Two of the members of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements pursuant to NI 52-110 and each of the members is financially literate within the meaning of NI 52-110.

 

As of the date hereof, the following are the members of our Audit Committee:

 

Name    

Independent (1)

   

Financially Literate (2)

Douglas Maine     Yes     Yes
William C. Van Faasen     No     Yes
Katie Bayne     Yes     Yes

 

 

Notes:

 

(1) In accordance with National Instrument 52-110 - Audit Committees, an independent director is one who is free from any direct or indirect relationship which could, in the view of the Board, be reasonably expected to interfere with such director’s exercise of independent judgment.

 

(2) A member of the Audit Committee is financially literate if he or she has the ability to read and understand a set of financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of the issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by our financial statements.

 

Relevant Education and Experience

 

Each member of the Audit Committee has experience relevant to his or her responsibilities as an Audit Committee member. See “Director and Executive Officer Biographies” for a description of the education and experience of each Audit Committee member.

 

Audit Committee’s Charter

 

The Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which sets out the Audit Committee’s responsibilities. A copy of the Audit Committee’s Charter is accessible on our website at investors.acreageholdings.com.

 

129

 

 

Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee

 

The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee met three times during 2020. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee is currently comprised of John Boehner and Kevin P. Murphy Chair.

 

The principal duties and responsibilities of the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee are to assist the Board in discharging its oversight of:

 

executive and director compensation;

executive compensation disclosure;

management development and succession;

the Company’s overall approach to corporate governance;

the size, composition and structure of the Board and its committees;

orientation and continuing education for directors;

related party transactions and other matters involving conflicts of interest; and

any additional matters delegated to the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee by the Board.

 

Board Qualifications

 

We believe that each of the members of our Board has the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that make him or her suitable to serve as our director, in light of our highly regulated cannabis business, our complex operations and number of employees. See “Director and Executive Officer Biographies” for a description of the education, experience, and qualifications of each director.

 

Conflicts of Interest

 

Certain of the Company’s directors and officers are, and may continue to be, involved in other business ventures through their direct and indirect participation in corporations, partnerships, joint ventures, etc. that may become potential competitors of the products and services the Company intends to provide. Situations may arise in connection with potential acquisitions or investment opportunities where the other interests of these directors and officers conflict with or diverge from the Company’s interests. In accordance with applicable corporate law, directors who have a material interest in or who are a party to a material contract or a proposed material contract with the Company are required, subject to certain exceptions, to disclose that interest and generally abstain from voting on any resolution to approve the contract. In addition, the directors and officers are required to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company. However, in conflict of interest situations, the Company’s directors and officers may owe the same duty to another company and will need to balance their competing interests with their duties to the Company. Circumstances (including with respect to future corporate opportunities) may arise that may be resolved in a manner that is unfavorable to the Company.

 

Ethical Business Conduct

 

The directors of the Company have adopted a formal written code of ethics and business conduct (the “Code”) in addition to compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations. The Code is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

 

honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

avoidance of conflicts of interest with the interests of the Company;

protection and proper use of corporate assets and opportunities;

compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

the prompt reporting of any violations of the Code to an appropriate person or person identified in the Code; and

accountability for adherence to the Code.

 

The Code sets the minimum standards expected to be met or exceeded in all business and dealings of the Company and provides guidelines to help address new situations. The directors of the Company expect the Company’s employees, officers, directors and representatives to act with honesty and integrity and to avoid any relationship or activity that might create, or appear to create, a conflict between their personal interest and the interests of the Company.

 

130

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The following discussion of the Company’s compensation philosophy, executive compensation programs and compensation paid to certain of its executive officers relates primarily to the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

 

The Company’s “Named Executive Officers” consist of the Chief Executive Officer and the two most highly compensated executive officers of the Company other than the Chief Executive Officer (each a “Named Executive Officer” and collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”). Since the Company had three different Chief Executive Offices during 2020, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, the Company’s Named Executive Officers were: (i) Kevin Murphy, our Chief Executive Officer until June 25, 2020; (ii) William Van Faasen, our interim Chief Executive Officer from June 25, 2020 until December 21, 2020, (iii) Filippo (Peter) Caldini, our Chief Executive Officer effective December 21, 2020, (iv) Robert Daino, our Chief Operating Officer; and (v) Glen Leibowitz, our former Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Leibowitz’s employment with us terminated on April 2, 2021.

 

Compensation Components

 

The executive compensation program during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 consisted of two principal components: (i) base salaries and (ii) equity-based compensation. Mr. Daino and Mr. Leibowitz also received a cash bonus, as described below. We also provided our executives standard retirement benefits and certain other benefits described below.

 

Base Salaries

 

Base salaries are intended to provide an appropriate level of fixed compensation that will assist in employee retention and recruitment. Base salaries will be determined on an individual basis, taking into consideration the past, current and potential contribution to the Company’s success, the position and responsibilities of the Named Executive Officers and competitive industry pay practices for other high growth, premium brand companies of similarly sized companies in the industry. The amount of base salary that we paid to each of our Named Executive Officers for 2020 is shown below in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

Equity-Based Compensation

 

The long-term component of compensation for executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, is based on Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) or other security-based compensation. This component of compensation is intended to reinforce management’s commitment to long term improvements in the Company’s performance.

 

The Board believes that incentive compensation in the form of stock option grants and other security-based compensation awards which vest over time is beneficial and necessary to attract and retain both senior executives and managerial talent at other levels. Furthermore, the Board believes stock option grants and other security-based compensation awards are an effective long-term incentive vehicle because they are directly tied to share price over a longer period, up to 10 years, and motivate executives to deliver sustained long term performance and increase shareholder value, and have a time horizon that aligns with long-term corporate goals.

 

During 2020, we granted the following equity awards to our Named Executive Officers for their service as employees. Named Executive Officers who also served as directors during 2020 received additional equity awards for their service as a director, which are included in the Outstanding Equity Awards table and described below under the heading “Director Compensation.”

 

Awards to Mr. Caldini. When we hired Mr. Caldini to be our Chief Executive Officer, we entered into an offer letter with him (which is described below under the heading “Employment and Severance Agreements”) where we agreed to grant him specific equity awards. Specifically, we agreed to grant him (i) an initial equity award with a value of up to $1,200,000, consisting of $800,000 of RSUs and $400,000 of options, each subject to a three-year vesting schedule in one-third increments per year, (ii) a one-time additional equity award of $2,000,000, consisting of $1,000,000 of options and $1,000,000 of RSUs, each subject to performance-based vesting based on the achievement of certain financial performance targets in fiscal years 2021 and 2022, and (iii) an additional equity award of $500,000, consisting of 50% options and 50% RSUs, each subject to vesting upon the achievement of certain financial performance targets in fiscal year 2022. The total number of RSUs and options granted subject to the equity awards was determined by dividing the ascribed value for each award by the closing price the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date.  For options in particular, the value of the equity awards specified in the offer letter may be different than the value of these awards when computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718.

 

Awards to Mr. Murphy and Mr. Van Faasen. We granted fully vested Class A Subordinate Voting Shares (which were converted into Fixed Shares and Floating Shares in connection with the Capital Reorganization) to Mr. Murphy and Mr. Van Faasen while each served as our Chief Executive Officer during 2020. Mr. Murphy’s awards were fully vested at the time of grant in lieu of any cash awards. Mr. Van Faasen was awarded fully vested shares each quarter during the duration of the search for the Company’s permanent Chief Executive Officer.

 

Awards to Mr. Daino and Mr. Leibowitz. We granted Time-Vesting RSUs to Mr. Daino and Mr. Leibowitz on February 20, 2020, a small portion of which were vested at grant in lieu of a cash award and the remainder of which vest in three annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the grant date, contingent on the grantee’s continued employment on the relevant vesting date. We also granted each of Mr. Daino and Mr. Leibowitz options with respect to Floating Shares on December 31, 2020, which have an exercise price of $2.05, were immediately vested as of the grant date, and which expire on December 31, 2025. This award of options with respect to Floating Shares was granted for the extreme efforts exerted by Mr. Daino and Mr. Leibowitz during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

 

We granted each of the awards described above under our Omnibus Plan, which we adopted on November 14, 2018 in connection with the RTO. The value of the vested shares, RSUs and stock options that we granted during 2020 appear in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns, respectively, of the Summary Compensation Table below.

 

131

 

 

Cash Bonus

 

The Company paid a cash bonus to each of Mr. Daino and Mr. Leibowitz for services provided in 2020 in the amount of $150,000 each.

 

Other Compensation and Retirement Plans

 

In addition to the benefits described above, we also provide our Named Executive Officers with a limited number of other benefits which disclosed and described in the Summary Compensation Table and related footnotes below. Our Named Executive Officers were also eligible to defer compensation into our tax-qualified 401(k) plan on the same basis as our other salaried employees. At this time, the Company does not make any matching or other company contributions to the 401(k) plan. We do not provide any other retirement plans or benefits to our Named Executive Officers other than the 401(k) plan.

 

Employment and Severance Agreements

 

We entered into an offer letter with Mr. Caldini (the “Caldini Offer Letter”) at the time we hired him to be our Chief Executive Officer. The Caldini Offer Letter provides that Mr. Caldini will be eligible to receive the following benefits while employed by the Company: (i) a base salary of $400,000 per year; (ii) an annual bonus, with a target equal to 100% of base salary, that may be earned based on achievement of financial performance goals set by the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”); (iii) an additional annual bonus opportunity, up to 200% of base salary, based on “outperformance” of certain financial performance goals set by the Compensation Committee; (iv) participation in the Company’s Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan; and (v) participation in the Company’s other benefit plans generally available to the Company’s employees. In the event that we terminate Mr. Caldini’s employment without “cause” (as defined in the Caldini Offer Letter), then Mr. Caldini would be entitled to receive 12 months of base salary continuation and subsidized medical coverage as severance.

 

The Caldini Offer Letter also provides that Mr. Caldini was entitled to receive certain equity awards upon hire. Each of these awards are discussed above under the heading “Equity-Based Compensation” and included in the Summary Compensation Table and Outstanding Equity Awards table below.

 

We also entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Leibowitz whereby the vesting schedules of all of his outstanding equity awards were accelerated to April 2, 2021. As part of the separation agreement, Mr. Leibowitz was also retained as a consultant for an initial six-month period that shall renew for one additional six-month period unless otherwise terminated by Mr. Leibowitz. Mr. Leibowitz did not receive any other benefits in connection with his departure.

 

We have not entered into any other employment, severance, change in control, or similar agreements with any of our Named Executive Officers.

 

Restrictions on Hedging

 

The Company’s Insider Trading and Reporting Policy prohibits the Company’s officers (including the Named Executive Officers), directors and employees from buying or selling financial instruments that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in market value of equity securities of the Company granted as compensation or held, directly or indirectly, by such individuals.

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table sets out the compensation for the Company’s Named Executive Officers for the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:

 

Name and
Principal Position
 

Fiscal

Year

    Salary
(US$)
   

Bonus

(US$)

    Stock
Awards
(US$)(1)
    Option
Awards
(US$)
    Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(US$)
    All Other
Compensation
(US$)(2)
    Total
Compensation
(US$)
 
Filippo (Peter) Caldini
Chief Executive Officer
    2020     $ 12,500       -     $ 2,050,001     $ 849,744       -       -     $ 2,912,245  
William Van Faasen
Interim Chief Executive Officer(3)
    2020     $ 182,765       -     $ 789,586     $ 18,927       -       -     $ 991,278  
Kevin P. Murphy
    2020     $ 187,500       -     $ 642,190     $ 18,927       -     $ 47,047     $ 895,663  
Former Chief Executive Officer(4)     2019     $ 375,000       -     $ 16,627,588       -       -     $ 36,230     $ 17,038,818  
Robert Daino     2020     $ 350,000     $ 150,000     $ 1,896,636     $ 201,952       -     $ 52,053     $ 2,650,641  
Chief Operating Officer     2019     $ 350,000       -     $ 16,627,588       -       -     $ 128,114     $ 17,105,702  
Glen Leibowitz
Former Chief Financial Officer
    2020     $ 300,000     $ 150,000     $ 1,570,188     $ 431,952              -       -     $ 2,452,140  

 

Notes:

 

(1) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of all RSUs and vested stock awards that the Company granted to each Named Executive Officer during 2020, as computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, which excludes the effect of estimated forfeitures. Further information regarding the valuation of equity awards can be found in Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

(2) Represents the cost of the apartment that the Company provided when the executive was required to be present at the Company’s office in New York City through March 31, 2020 (Mr. Murphy – $27,975; Mr. Daino – $23,470) plus a tax gross up on such benefit (Mr. Murphy – $26,000; Mr. Daino – $22,522).

 

(3) Includes amounts paid to Mr. Van Faasen for his service as the Interim Chief Executive Officer from June 25, 2020 until December 21, 2020 and his service as a non-employee director during 2020. All amounts included in this table are for his service as the Interim Chief Executive Officer, other (i) $651,736 in the stock column, which represents the value of RSUs that he received on February 20, 2020 and December 31, 2020 for his service as a director, and (ii) the full amount reflected in the option column, which represents the value of the options that he received on December 31, 2020 for his service as a director.

 

(4) Includes amounts paid to Mr. Murphy for his service as the Chief Executive Officer from January 1, 2020 until June 25, 2020, and for his service as a non-employee director from June 25, 2020 to December 31, 2020. All amounts included in this table are for his service as the Chief Executive Officer, other than (i) $435,002 in the stock column, which represents the value of RSUs that he received on December 31, 2020 for his service as a director and (ii) the full amount reflected in the option column, which represents the value of the options that he received on December 31, 2020 for his service as a director.

 

132

 

 

Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2020

 

The following table sets out information concerning all outstanding share-based awards and option-based awards granted by the Company to the Company’s Named Executive Officers as at December 31, 2020.

 

        Option Awards(1)     Stock Awards  
Name   Share Type  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options -
Exercisable

(#)

   

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options -
Unexercisable

(#)(1)

   

 

Option
Exercise
Price (US$)

    Option
Expiration
Date
    Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock that
Have Not Vested
(#)
    Market Value of Shares or
Units of Stock That Have
Not Vested (US$)(2)
 
Peter Caldini   Fixed     -       366,667 (3)   $ 3.15     12/31/2025       455,556 (6)   $ 1,435,001  
    Floating     -       241,464 (4)   $ 2.05     12/31/2025       300,000 (7)   $ 615,000  
William Van Faasen   Fixed     -       -       -     -       52,691 (8)   $ 165,977  
    Floating     -       19,512 (5)   $ 2.05     12/31/2025       100,632 (9)   $ 206,295  
Kevin P. Murphy   Fixed     -       -       -     -       544,326 (10)   $ 1,714,626  
    Floating     -       19,512 (5)   $ 2.05     12/31/2025       311,331 (11)   $ 638,229  
Robert Daino   Fixed     -       -       -     -       761,624 (12)   $ 2,399,115  
    Floating     219,513       -     $ 2.05     12/31/2025       326,409 (13)   $ 669,139  
Glen Leibowitz   Fixed     -       -       -     -       720,791 (14)   $ 2,270,491  
    Floating     469,513       -     $ 2.05     12/31/2025       308,910 (15)   $ 633,266  

 

Notes:

 

(1) Each Named Executive Officer who held option awards that were granted on November 14, 2018 agreed to cancel such awards for no consideration in connection with the Amending Agreement entered into with Canopy Growth.

 

(2) Calculated as the Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested multiplied by the closing market price of a Fixed Share or Floating Share, as applicable, on December 31, 2020, which was and $3.15 and $2.05, respectively.

 

(3) Represents 88,889 options that vest in three annual installments on each anniversary of the grant date of December 31, 2020; 222,222 options that vest based on the Company achieving at least 90% of its Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA target in 2021 and 2022, with 50% of such options being allocated to fiscal 2021 performance and 50% being allocated to fiscal 2022 performance; and 55,556 options that vest if the Company achieves 100% or more of the Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Target for its fiscal 2022 year.

 

(4) Represents 58,537 options that vest in three annual installments on each anniversary of the grant date of December 31, 2020; 146,342 options that vest based on the Company achieving at least 90% of its Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA target in 2021 and 2022, with 50% of such options being allocated to fiscal 2021 performance and 50% being allocated to fiscal 2022 performance; and 36,585 options that vest if the Company achieves 100% or more of the Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Target for its fiscal 2022 year.

 

(5) One fourth of these options vest at the end of each quarter in 2021.

 

(6) Represents 177,778 RSUs that vest in three annual installments on each anniversary of the grant date of December 31, 2020; 222,222 RSUs that vest based on the Company achieving at least 90% of its Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA target in 2021 and 2022, with 50% of such RSUs being allocated to fiscal 2021 performance and 50% being allocated to fiscal 2022 performance and 55,556 RSUs that vest if the Company achieves 100% or more of the Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Target for its fiscal 2022 year.

 

(7) Represents 117,073 RSUs that vest in three annual installments on each anniversary of the grant date of December 31, 2020; 146,342 RSUs that vest based on the Company achieving at least 90% of its Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA target in 2021 and 2022, with 50% of such RSUs being allocated to fiscal 2021 performance and 50% being allocated to fiscal 2022 year; and 36,585 RSUs that vest if the Company achieves 100% or more of the Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Target for its fiscal 2022 year.

 

(8) Represents 32,666 RSUs that vest on February 20, 2021 and 20,025 that vest on November 14, 2021.

 

(9) Represents 78,049 RSUs that vest in four quarterly installments at the end of each quarter in 2021; 14,000 RSUs that vest on February 20, 2021; 8,583 RSUs that vest on November 14, 2021.

 

(10) Represents 515,463 RSUs that vest 1/3 on June 27, 2021 and 2/3 three months following the Acquisition Time; and 28,863 RSUs that vest in four quarterly installments on February 14, 2021, May 14, 2021, August 14, 2021 and November 14, 2021.

 

(11) Represents 12,370 RSUs that vest in four substantially equal quarterly installments on February 14, 2021, May 14, 2021, August 14, 2021 and November 14, 2021; 78,049 RSUs that vest in four quarterly installments at the end of each quarter in 2021 and 220,912 RSUs that vest 1/3 on June 27, 2021 and 2/3 three months following the Acquisition Time.

 

(12) Represents 233,333 RSUs that vest in three substantially equal installments on February 20 of 2021, 2022 and 2023; 12,828 RSUs that vest in four substantially equal quarterly installments on February 14, 2021, May 14, 2021, August 14, 2021 and November 14, 2021; and 515,463 RSUs that vest 1/3 on June 27, 2021 and 2/3 three months following the Acquisition Time.

 

(13) Represents 99,999 RSUs that vest in three substantially equal installments on February 20 of 2021, 2022 and 2023; 5,498 RSUs that vest in four substantially equal quarterly installments on February 14, 2021, May 14, 2021, August 14, 2021 and November 14, 2021; and 220,912 RSUs that vest 1/3 on June 27, 2021 and 2/3 three months following the Acquisition Time.

 

(14) Represents 192,500 RSUs that vest in three substantially equal installments on February 20 of 2021, 2022 and 2023; 12,828 RSUs that vest in four substantially equal quarterly installments on February 14, 2021, May 14, 2021, August 14, 2021 and November 14, 2021; and 515,463 RSUs that vest 1/3 on June 27, 2021 and 2/3 three months following the Acquisition Time.

 

(15) Represents 82,500 RSUs that vest in three substantially equal installments on February 20 of 2021, 2022 and 2023; 5,498 RSUs that vest in four substantially equal quarterly installments on February 14, 2021, May 14, 2021, August 14, 2021 and November 14, 2021; and 220,912 RSUs that vest 1/3 on June 27, 2021 and 2/3 three months following the Acquisition Time.

 

133

 

 

Termination and Change of Control Benefits

 

The Named Executive Officers are not entitled to any payments following or in connection with any termination, resignation, retirement, change in control or change in the responsibilities of the Named Executive Officers, except for the following:

 

  •  As disclosed above under the heading “Employment and Severance Agreements,” in the event that we terminate Mr. Caldini’s employment without “cause” (as defined in the Caldini Offer Letter), then Mr. Caldini would be entitled to receive 12 months of base salary continuation and subsidized medical coverage as severance.

 

A portion of each of Messrs. Murphy, Daino and Leibowitz’s RSUs vest solely upon Canopy Growth’s acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding Fixed Shares, as disclosed in the footnotes to the Outstanding Equity Awards table above. In addition, pursuant to the terms of certain lock-up and incentive agreements among the Company, Canopy Growth, and each of Mr. Murphy, Mr. Daino and Mr. Leibowitz, such individuals are subject to a non-compete covenant that continues for one year after their termination of employment for any reason, but if the Company terminates their employment without cause, then we would be required to pay them one year of severance to enforce the non-compete.

 

Pursuant to the terms of our Omnibus Incentive Plan, all outstanding stock options will become fully exercisable immediately before a change in control, and any RSUs (other than the Special Canopy Growth RSUs, which are subject to the conditions described above) will become fully vested upon the change in control (assuming, if applicable, that any performance criteria were achieved at the target level), unless the surviving entity agrees to assume the awards or issue substitute awards.

 

In connection with the Amending Agreement, the Company entered into agreements with Mr. Daino and Mr. Leibowitz that provide that if either (i) the Company terminates their employment or (ii) if any of Mr. Daino, Mr. Leibowitz, Mr. Doherty (our General Counsel and Secretary), Mr. Boehner, Mr. Mulroney, Mr. Maine or Mr. Van Faasen resigns from any and all positions with the Company on or after the one year anniversary of the Amendment Date, then the Company will accelerate the vesting of all of their RSUs outstanding as of such date.

 

When Mr. Leibowitz’s employment terminated effective April 2, 2021, the only benefit that he received was the accelerated vesting described in the fourth bullet above.

 

Director Compensation

 

During 2020, each non-employee director received the following compensation (provided that they were serving as a non-employee director on the relevant grant date): (i) RSUs that were granted on February 20, 2020 and which vest on the first anniversary thereof provided the director is still providing services on such date, for Board services completed during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020; (ii) fully-vested Floating Shares and Fixed Shares on December 31, 2020, for Board services to be completed during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and (iii) RSUs and option awards with respect to Floating Shares that were granted on December 31, 2020 and that vest in four quarterly installments during 2021 contingent on the director continuing to provide services through the relevant vesting date. This third grant awarded on December 31, 2020 was granted to the Board members for the extreme efforts exerted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. We also reimbursed our directors for any out-of-pocket travel expenses incurred in order to attend meetings of the Board, committees of the Board or meetings of the Company’s Shareholders. We did not provide our directors with any cash retainers or pay any fees for attending Board meetings.

 

Director Compensation Table

 

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation earned by the non-executive directors during the 12 months ended December 31, 2020. Compensation earned by Mr. Murphy and Mr. Van Faasen as directors are included in the Summary Compensation Table above.

 

Name  

Fees Earned
(US$)

   

Share-Based
Awards
(US$)(1)(2)

   

Option
Awards
(US$)(3)

   

All Other
Compensation
(US$)

   

Total (US$)

 
John Boehner     -     $ 625,836     $ 18,927       -     $ 644,763  
Douglas Maine     -     $ 676,737     $ 18,927       -     $ 695,663  
Brian Mulroney     -     $ 625,836     $ 18,927       -     $ 644,763  

 

134

 

 

Notes:

 

  (1) Represents the grant date fair value, as computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, of the following RSU grants made during 2020 for each director:

 

    2/20/2020
RSUs – Class A
Subordinate Voting
    12/31/2020 – Fully
Vested Fixed Shares
    12/31/2020 – Fully
Vested Floating Shares
    12/31/2020 – Floating
RSUs
 
John Boehner     41,667       19,841       91,464       78,049  
Douglas Maine     46,667       21,825       100,611       78,049  
Brian Mulroney     41,667       19,841       91,464       78,049  

 

(2) As of December 31, 2020, the directors had the following number of RSUs (i) with respect to Fixed Shares outstanding: Mr. Boehner – 29,166; Mr. Maine – 52,691; and Mr. Mulroney – 104,357; and (ii) with respect to Floating Shares outstanding: Mr. Boehner – 90,549; Mr. Maine – 100,632; and Mr. Mulroney – 122,774.

 

(3) Represents the grant date fair value, as computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, of the grant of 19,512 options with respect to Floating Shares, which vest at the end of each of the four quarters in 2021, have an exercise price of $2.05 per share, and expire on December 31, 2025. As of December 31, 2020, these were the director’s only outstanding option awards.

 

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Acreage Holdings, Inc. Omnibus Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”) under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2020:

 

Plan Category   Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
    Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
    Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders     13,589,797     $ 6.01       7,023,338  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders                  
Total     13,589,797     $ 6.01       7,023,338  

 

Subject to adjustment provisions as provided in the Omnibus Plan, the maximum number of Fixed Shares and Floating Shares that may be issued under the Omnibus Plan shall be equal to 15% of the number of issued and outstanding Fixed Shares and Floating Shares from time to time, on an as converted to Fixed Shares and Floating Shares basis. Such awards may be made in any form permitted under the Omnibus Plan, in any combinations approved by the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee.

 

135

 

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our shares as of April 1, 2021 by: each current director and director nominee; each executive officer appearing in the Statement of Executive Compensation; all directors and executive officers as a group; and any person who is known to us to to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares based on our review of the reports regarding ownership filed with the SEC in accordance with Sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner/Class of Stock(1)   Share Ownership and
Percentage of
Class(2)
    Percentage of Aggregate Voting Power  
Kevin P. Murphy             83.9 %
Class D Subordinate Voting Shares(3)     2,013,084       5.7 %
                 
Class E Subordinate Voting Shares     4,173,165       5.4 %
                 
Class F Multiple Voting Shares     117,600       100 %
                 
Common Units of High Street Capital Partners, LLC     15,957,908       69.2 %
                 
John Boehner             *  
Class D Subordinate Voting Shares(3)     207,132       *  
                 
Class E Subordinate Voting Shares     96,237       *  
                 
Class F Multiple Voting Shares            
                 
Common Units of High Street Capital Partners, LLC     360,107       1.6 %
                 
Douglas Maine             *  
Class D Subordinate Voting Shares(3)     223,281       *  
                 
Class E Subordinate Voting Shares     114,559       *  
                 
Class F Multiple Voting Shares            
                 
Common Units of High Street Capital Partners, LLC            
                 
Brian Mulroney             *  
Class D Subordinate Voting Shares(3)     283,563       *  
                 
Class E Subordinate Voting Shares     274,577       *  
                 
Class F Multiple Voting Shares            
                 
Common Units of High Street Capital Partners, LLC            
                 
William C. Van Faasen             *  
Class D Subordinate Voting Shares(3)     281,536       *  
                 
Class E Subordinate Voting Shares     269,507       *  
                 
Class F Multiple Voting Shares            
                 
Common Units of High Street Capital Partners, LLC            
                 
Katie J. Bayne             *  
Class D Subordinate Voting Shares     91,464       *  
                 
Class E Subordinate Voting Shares     16,448       *  
                 
Class F Multiple Voting Shares            
                 
Common Units of High Street Capital Partners, LLC            
                 
Patricia Lopez             *  
Class D Subordinate Voting Shares           *  
                 
Class E Subordinate Voting Shares           *  
                 
Class F Multiple Voting Shares            
                 
Common Units of High Street Capital Partners, LLC            
                 
Peter Caldini             *  
Class D Subordinate Voting Shares(3)     300,000       *  
                 
Class E Subordinate Voting Shares     455,556       *  
                 
Class F Multiple Voting Shares            
                 
Common Units of High Street Capital Partners, LLC            
                 
Robert Daino             *  
Class D Subordinate Voting Shares(3)     680,724       1.9 %
                 
Class E Subordinate Voting Shares     1,076,281       1.4 %
                 
Class F Multiple Voting Shares            
                 
Common Units of High Street Capital Partners, LLC            
                 
Glen Leibowitz             *  
Class D Subordinate Voting Shares(3)     822,608       2.3%  
                 
Class E Subordinate Voting Shares     823,996       1.1  
                 
Class F Multiple Voting Shares            
                 
Common Units of High Street Capital Partners, LLC     216,064        
                 
All directors and executive officers as a group (10 people)             84.3 %
Class D Subordinate Voting Shares(3)     4,780,259       13.6 %
                 
Class E Subordinate Voting Shares     7,404,444       9.6  
                 
Class F Multiple Voting Shares     117,600       100 %
                 
Common Units of High Street Capital Partners, LLC     16,528,388       71.7 %

 

136

 

 

Notes:

 

  * Less than 1%.
     
  (1) Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each beneficial owners is 450 Lexington Avenue, #3308, New York, NY 10163.
     
  (2) All information with respect to beneficial ownership is based upon filings made by the respective beneficial owners with the SEC or information provided to us by such beneficial owners. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all Shares shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws.
     
  (3) Includes 4,878 Class D Subordinate Voting Shares subject to acquisition by John Boehner, 4,878 Class D Subordinate Voting Shares subject to acquisition by Kevin P. Murphy, 4,878 Class D Subordinate Voting Shares subject to acquisition by Douglas Maine, 4,878 Class D Subordinate Voting Shares subject to acquisition by William C. Van Faasen, 4,878 Class D Subordinate Voting Shares subject to acquisition by Brian Mulroney, 219,513 Class D Subordinate Voting Shares subject to acquisition by Robert Daino, 469,513 Class D Subordinate Voting Shares subject to acquisition by Glen Leibowitz, in each case, pursuant to the exercise of stock options held as of April 1, 2021 that were then vested or that will vest within 60 days thereafter.

 

137

 

 

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

Related Party Transaction Policy

 

The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee is charged with reviewing and approving all related-party transactions and preparing reports for the Board on such-related party transactions.

 

Related Party Transactions

 

$15.0 Million Loan

 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, Mr. Kevin Murphy, the Company’s Chairman made a non-interest bearing loan of $15.0 million to us, which was subsequently repaid in March, 2020.

 

$5.0 Million Loan

 

In January 2020, Kevin Murphy loaned $5.0 million to us, which was repaid on March 4, 2020.

 

HSCP CN Holdings ULC Loan

 

On February 7, 2020, we entered into a credit agreement (the “February Credit Agreement”) through our subsidiary, HSCP CN Holdings ULC (the “Borrower”), by and among the Borrower, Acreage Finance Delaware, LLC (the “Guarantor”), and the institutional lender party thereto and its administrative agent.

 

The February Credit Agreement provides for a secured credit facility in the amount of up to $100.0 million, which may be drawn down on by the Borrower in three tranches, maturing on the date that is two years from the date the first tranche is drawn down on. The obligations under the February Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the Guarantor, and secured by a first priority lien (the “Security Interest”) over $50.0 million in cash deposited in a bank account by us (the “Restricted Account”).

 

In order to fund the Restricted Account, on March 6, 2020, our subsidiary, the IP Borrower entered into the Original Credit Agreement, which provided for a credit facility in the amount of up to $50.0 million (“Credit Facility”) to be available in two advances. The maturity date for the first advance of borrowings under the March Credit Agreement, subject to acceleration in certain instances, is 366 days from the closing date of the Credit Facility. All funds drawn under the Credit Facility are required to be deposited into the Restricted Account as security for repayment of funds borrowed and amounts owing pursuant to the February Credit Agreement.

 

On March 11, 2020, IP Borrower drew the first advance of $22.0 million (the “Borrowed Amount”) under the Original Credit Agreement and deposited the funds into the Restricted Account (the “Loan Transaction”). Kevin Murphy, our Chair and former Chief Executive Officer, loaned $21.0 million of the Borrowed Amount to the IP Lender in connection with the Loan Transaction.

 

Interest on the principal amount borrowed under the Credit Facility was to be satisfied by the IP Borrower delivering to the IP Lender 83,333 SVS per month (or 58,333 Fixed Shares and 24,999 Floating Shares), or 1,000,000 SVS (or 700,000 Fixed Shares and 300,000 Floating Shares) in the aggregate (the “Interest Shares”). We were advised that Mr. Murphy was not a member, an officer nor a director of IP Lender and that Mr. Murphy was entitled to receive, assuming full repayment of the Borrowed Amount at maturity, $23.1 million along with up to 304,001 SVS, forming part of the Interest Shares, which entitlement to Interest Shares he forfeited in accordance with the Amended Arrangement.

 

In connection with, and as a condition to the implementation of, the Amended Arrangement, the Original Credit Agreement was amended in accordance with the Credit Agreement Amendment. The Credit Agreement Amendment provides that: (i) with respect to the Murphy Amount, effective as of the Amendment Time, the Original Credit Agreement was amended to (a) remove any entitlement to “Interest Shares” (as defined in the Original Credit Agreement) in respect of this amount, (b) provide for an interest rate of 12% per annum payable in cash, (c) amend Section 9.3 of the Original Credit Agreement to amend the obligation of IP Borrower to cause us to sell up to 8,800,000 SVS to repay the amount outstanding such that the obligation was reduced to cause the issuance of up to 2,000,000 Fixed Shares, and (ii) with respect to $1.0 million of the principal amount advanced pursuant to the Original Credit Agreement, the lender is entitled to (a) 16,799 Fixed Shares and 7,199 Floating Shares, (b) upon maturity of the Original Credit Agreement, a return of $1.1 million and (c) otherwise be treated in accordance with the current terms of the Original Credit Agreement.

 

IP Lender was entitled to 23,999 SVS under the Original Credit Agreement, of which 12,000 SVS were issued to IP Lender prior to the Capital Reorganization. The 12,000 SVS issued to IP Lender prior to the Capital Reorganization were subsequently transferred to Pilgrim Foresight Fund, LLC (“Pilgrim”), an affiliate of IP Lender, pursuant to applicable securities laws. Subsequent to the Capital Reorganization, the SVS originally issued to IP Lender and currently held by Pilgrim were exchanged for 8,400 Fixed Shares and 3,600 Floating Shares. In accordance with the Credit Agreement Amendment, IP Lender received an additional 8,399 Fixed Shares and 3,599 Floating Shares, with such shares replacing the 11,999 SVS IP Lender was entitled to pursuant to the Original Credit Agreement. Upon the extension of the maturity of the portion of the Loan Transaction held by the IP Lender to March 31, 2021, we issued an additional 1,181 Fixed Shares and 506 Floating Shares to the IP Lender.

 

138

 

 

This Prospectus registers the resale of the 16,799 Fixed Shares and 7,199 Floating Shares by Pilgrim in connection with the Loan Transaction (the “Loan Shares”). We will not receive any cash proceeds from the sale of the Loan Shares.

 

GreenAcreage Real Estate

 

We have an investment carried at fair value through profit and loss in GreenAcreage Real Estate (“GreenAcreage”). We also have an equity method investment in the management company of GreenAcreage resulting from the Chairman’s board involvement. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company sold and subsequently leased back several of its capital assets in a transaction with GreenAcreage. The subsequent leases met the criteria for finance leases, and as such, the transactions do not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment. On July 15, 2020, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a definitive agreement with GreenAcreage to internalize the Company’s management operations.

 

September 2020 Transactions

 

As disclosed in the Company’s financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2020, Note 10, September 2020 Transactions, on September 23, 2020, pursuant to the implementation of the Amended Arrangement, a subsidiary of Canopy Growth advanced gross proceeds of $50.0 million (less transaction costs of approximately $4.0 million) to Universal Hemp, an affiliate of the Company, pursuant to the terms of the Debenture. In accordance with the terms of the Debenture, the funds cannot be used, directly or indirectly, in connection with or for any cannabis or cannabis-related operations in the United States, unless and until such operations comply with all applicable laws of the United States. Furthermore, Acreage engaged an investment advisor (the “Investment Advisor”) which, under its Investment Advisor’s sole discretion, invested on behalf of Universal Hemp $34.0 million on September 28, 2020.

 

As a result, Universal Hemp, a subsidiary of the Company, acquired 34,019 class B units, at $1 par value per unit, which represented 100% financial interest in an Investment Partnership, a Canada-based limited partnership. The Investment Partnership and the general partner were independently formed by an institutional investor. The institutional investor is a Canadian alternative asset manager, along with its affiliates and subsidiaries (the “Institutional Investor”). The Investment Partnership’s General Partner and limited partner hold class A units and class B units and are owned and controlled by an affiliated entity of the Institutional Investor and the Investment Advisor, respectively. On September 28, 2020, the Company received gross proceeds of $33.0 (less transaction costs of approximately $959,000) from an institutional lender and used a portion of the proceeds of this loan to retire its short-term $11.0 million convertible note and its short-term note aggregating approximately $18.0 million in October 2020, with the remainder being used for working capital purposes. The Institutional Lender is controlled by the class A and class B unitholders of the Investment Partnership. The Investment Partnership is an investor in the Institutional Lender.

  

Board of Directors Independence

 

The Board is currently comprised of six members. Three of the six directors are considered to be independent under the CSA Guidelines and in accordance with National Instrument 52-110 - Audit Committees (“NI 52-110”). Under NI 52-110, an independent director is one who is free from any direct or indirect relationship which could, in the view of the Board, be reasonably expected to interfere with such director’s exercise of independent judgment. The directors of the Company who are independent are Brian Mulroney, Douglas Maine, and Katie Bayne. Mr. Murphy is not independent, given that he was previously the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. Van Faasen is not independent given that he previously served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mr. Boehner is not independent because he received more than C$75,000 in direct compensation from High Street for advisory services and related matters within a twelve-month period during the past three years. Douglas Maine is the current lead independent director of the Company. The lead independent director is expected to coordinate the activities of the other independent directors and to perform such other duties and responsibilities as the Board may direct.

 

The independent directors meet for in camera sessions without non-independent directors and members of management at the end of each regular Board meeting (unless they waive such requirement).

 

Promoters

 

Mr. Murphy may be considered a promoter of the Company, as he has taken the initiative in reorganizing and financing the business of the Company pursuant to the RTO. Other than as disclosed in this Prospectus, there is nothing of value, including money, property, contracts, options or rights of any kind received or to be received by Mr. Murphy directly or indirectly from the Company, High Street or any Subsidiary thereof nor any assets, services or other consideration received or to be received by the Company, High Street or any Subsidiary thereof in return. Except as disclosed in this Annual Report, no asset has been acquired within the Company’s two most recently completed financial years or during the Company’s current financial year, or is to be acquired by the Company, High Street or any Subsidiary, from Mr. Murphy for valuable consideration. Mr. Murphy beneficially owns, controls or directs, 117,600 Fixed Multiple Shares, representing 100% of the issued and outstanding Fixed Multiple Shares, 3,599,807 Fixed Shares, representing approximately 5.06% of the issued and outstanding Fixed Shares, 1,593,174 Floating Shares, representing approximately 5.21% of the issued and outstanding Floating Shares, 378,000 stock options exercisable to acquire 378,000 Fixed Shares, 162,000 stock options exercisable to acquire 162,000 Floating Shares, 551,541 restricted share units to acquire 551,541 Fixed Shares, 236,374 restricted share units to acquire 236 374 Floating Shares and 15,957,908 High Street Units, which High Street Units may be exchanged for Fixed Shares and Floating Shares or, at the Company’s option, cash.

 

139

 

 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

The Company is a party to a variety of legal proceedings that arise out of operations in the normal course of business. While the results of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the final outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on our results of operations or financial condition. Below is a brief description of our material pending legal proceedings.

 

EPMMNY

 

On November 2, 2018, EPMMNY LLC (“EPMMNY”) filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, asserting claims against 16 defendants, including NYCANNA, Impire State Holdings LLC, NY Medicinal Research & Caring, LLC (each, a wholly-owned subsidiary of High Street) and High Street. The Index Number for the action is 655480/2018. EPMMNY alleges that it was wrongfully deprived of a minority equity interest and management role in NYCANNA by its former partner, New Amsterdam Distributors, LLC, which attempted to directly or indirectly sell or transfer EPMMNY’s alleged interest in NYCANNA to other entities in 2016 and 2017, including Impire, NYMRC and High Street. EPMMNY alleges that it is entitled to the value of its alleged minority interest in NYCANNA or minority ownership in NYCANNA. EPMMNY also alleges that certain defendants misused its alleged intellectual property and/or services, improperly solicited its employees, and aided and abetted or participated in the transfer of equity and/or business opportunities from EPMMNY. High Street intends to vigorously defend this action, which the Company firmly believes is without merit. EPMMNY alleges that it was improperly deprived of its equity stake in NYCANNA before NYCANNA was acquired by High Street. High Street is also entitled to full indemnity from the claims asserted against it by EPMMNY pursuant to the purchase agreement pertaining to its acquisition of NYCANNA and personal guarantee by the largest shareholders of the seller. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on April 1, 2019. The motion was fully briefed and submitted to the Court on July 18, 2019, and oral argument was heard on September 6, 2019. The motion remains pending before the Court. A Special Referee hearing relating to the motion to dismiss has been scheduled for May 2021. The plaintiff also filed a motion seeking a preliminary injunction of any transfer of our assets. This motion was fully briefed and we are awaiting the courts decision.

 

Compass Neuroceuticals

 

In February 2021, a JAMS arbitration was initiated in Atlanta by Acreage Georgia LLC (“Acreage Georgia”) against its former consultant, Compass Neuroceuticals, Inc. (“Compass”), stemming from Compass’ breach of the consulting agreement entered into between the parties in June 2019, related to the preparation of an application for a Class 1 cultivation license in Georgia. Acreage Georgia is alleging damages, including lost profits, of approximately $9.0 million. Compass filed counterclaims for breach, also in the $9.0 million range. A final arbitration hearing is currently scheduled for August 2021. The matter is in its early stages, therefore, it is too early to ascertain the materiality of any potential settlement or judgment, but the Company plans to defend itself vigorously in this matter.

 

140

 

 

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

 

We are registering the securities offered by this prospectus on behalf of the Selling Security Holders named herein. The Selling Security Holders, which as used herein includes donees, pledgees, transferees or other successors-in-interest selling such securities received after the date of this prospectus from a selling stockholder as a gift, pledge, limited liability company or partnership distribution or other transfer, may, from time to time, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of any or all of their securities on the CSE, the OTCQX, the FRA or any other stock exchange, market or trading facility on which such securities are traded or in private transactions. These dispositions may be at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, at prices related to the prevailing market price, at varying prices determined at the time of sale or at negotiated prices.

 

The Selling Security Holders may use any one or more of the following methods when disposing of their securities or interests therein:

 

· ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;

· in underwritten transactions;

· block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the securities as agent, but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;

· purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;

· an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;

· privately negotiated transactions;

· short sales;

· through the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions, whether through an options exchange or otherwise;

· broker-dealers may agree with the Selling Security Holders to sell a specified number of such securities at a stipulated price;

· distribution to members, limited partners or stockholders of Selling Security Holders;

· a combination of any such methods of sale; and

· any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

 

The Selling Security Holders may, from time to time, pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the securities owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell their securities, from time to time, under this prospectus, or under an amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act amending the list of Selling Security Holders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as Selling Security Holders under this prospectus. The Selling Security Holders also may transfer their securities in other circumstances, in which case the transferees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus.

 

In connection with the sale of our securities or interests therein, the Selling Security Holders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in turn engage in short sales of our securities in the course of hedging the positions they assume. The Selling Security Holders may also sell their securities short and deliver these securities to close out their short positions, or loan or pledge such securities to broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities. The Selling Security Holders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or the creation of one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealers or other financial institutions of securities offered by this prospectus, which securities such broker-dealers or other financial institutions may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).

 

The aggregate proceeds to the Selling Security Holders from the sale of the securities offered by them will be the purchase price of the security less discounts or commissions, if any. Each of the Selling Security Holders reserves the right to accept and, together with their agents from time to time, to reject, in whole or in part, any proposed purchase of their securities to be made directly or through agents. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the resale of securities being offered by the Selling Security Holders named herein. However, we will receive proceeds from the exercise of the warrants if they are exercised by a holder thereof for cash.

 

The Selling Security Holders also may resell all or a portion of their securities in open market transactions in reliance upon Rule 144 under the Securities Act provided that the rule is available and they meet the criteria and conform to the requirements of that rule.

 

The Selling Security Holders and any broker-dealers that act in connection with the sale of securities might be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act and any commissions received by such broker-dealers and any profit on the resale of the securities sold by them while acting as principals might be deemed to be underwriting discounts or commissions under the Securities Act.

 

To the extent required, the securities to be sold, the names of the Selling Security Holders, the respective purchase prices and public offering prices, the names of any agent, dealer or underwriter, and any applicable commissions or discounts with respect to a particular offer will be set forth in an accompanying prospectus supplement or, if appropriate, a post-effective amendment to the registration statement that includes this prospectus.

 

141

 

 

We have advised the Selling Security Holders that the anti-manipulation rules of Regulation M under the Exchange Act may apply to sales of securities in the market and to the activities of the Selling Security Holders and their affiliates. In addition, we will make copies of this prospectus (as it may be supplemented or amended from time to time) available to the Selling Security Holders for the purpose of satisfying the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act. The Selling Security Holders may indemnify any broker-dealer that participates in transactions involving the sale of their securities against certain liabilities, including liabilities arising under the Securities Act.

 

All discounts, commissions or fees incurred in connection with the sale of securities offered hereby will be paid by the Selling Security Holders.

 

142

 

 

DESCRIPTION OF FIXED SHARES

 

Holders of Fixed Shares are entitled to notice of and to attend at any meeting of our shareholders, except a meeting of which only holders of another particular class or series of our shares shall have the right to vote. At each such meeting, holders of Fixed Shares are entitled to one vote in respect of each Fixed Share held.

 

As long as any Fixed Shares remain outstanding, we may not, without the consent of the holders of the Fixed Shares expressed by separate special resolution, alter or amend our Articles if the result would prejudice or interfere with any right or special right attached to the Fixed Shares.

 

Holders of Fixed Shares are entitled to receive, as and when declared by our Board, dividends in cash or our property. No dividend may be declared on the Fixed Shares unless we simultaneously declare dividends on: (i) the Fixed Multiple Shares, in an amount per Fixed Multiple Share equal to the amount of the dividend declared per Fixed Share; and (ii) the Floating Shares, in an amount per Floating Share equal to the amount of the dividend declared per Fixed Share.

 

In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, whether voluntary or involuntary, or in the event of any other distribution of assets among our shareholders for the purpose of winding up our affairs, the holders of Fixed Shares are entitled to participate pari passu with the holders of Floating Shares and Fixed Multiple Shares, with the amount of such distribution per Fixed Share equal to each of: (i) the amount of such distribution per Floating Share; and (ii) the amount of such distribution per Fixed Multiple Share.

 

Holders of Fixed Shares are not entitled to a right of first refusal to subscribe for, purchase or receive any part of any issue of shares, or bonds, debentures or our other securities.

 

There may be no subdivision or consolidation of the Fixed Shares unless, simultaneously, the Floating Shares and Fixed Multiple Shares are subdivided or consolidated utilizing the same divisor or multiplier.

 

Any Fixed Shares resold pursuant to this Prospectus, will be subject in all respects to the Canopy Call Option to acquire such Fixed Shares.

 

143

 

 

DESCRIPTION OF FLOATING SHARES

 

Holders of Floating Shares are entitled to notice of and to attend at any meeting of our shareholders, except a meeting of which only holders of another particular class or series of our shares shall have the right to vote. At each such meeting, holders of Floating Shares are entitled to one vote in respect of each Floating Share held.

 

As long as any Floating Shares remain outstanding, we may not, without the consent of the holders of the Floating Shares expressed by separate special resolution, alter or amend our Articles if the result would be to prejudice or interfere with any right or special right attached to the Floating Shares or affect the rights of the holders of Fixed Shares, Floating Shares or Fixed Multiple Shares on a per share basis. In connection with the exercise of the voting rights in respect of any such approvals, each holder of Floating Shares has one vote in respect of each Floating Share held.

 

Holders of Floating Shares are entitled to receive, as and when declared by the Board, dividends in cash or our property. No dividend may be declared on the Floating Shares unless we simultaneously declare dividends on: (i) the Fixed Shares in an amount equal to the dividend declared per Floating Shares; and (ii) on the Fixed Multiple Shares in an amount equal to the dividend declared per Floating Share.

 

In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, whether voluntary or involuntary, or in the event of any other distribution of assets among our shareholders for the purpose of winding up our affairs, the holders of Floating Shares are entitled to participate pari passu with: (i) the holders of Fixed Shares in an amount equal to the amount of such distribution per Fixed Share; (ii) the holders of Fixed Multiple Share in an amount equal to the amount of such distribution per Fixed Multiple Share.

 

Holders of Floating Shares are not entitled to a right of first refusal to subscribe for, purchase or receive any part of any issue of shares, or bonds, debentures or our other securities.

 

There may be no subdivision or consolidation of the Floating Shares unless, simultaneously, the Fixed Shares and Fixed Multiple Shares are subdivided or consolidated using the same divisor or multiplier.

 

Any Floating Shares resold pursuant to this Prospectus will be subject in all respects to the Floating Call Option to acquire such Floating Shares.

 

Forum Selection Provision

 

Our Articles contain a forum selection provision under Article 30, which, among other things, identifies the Supreme Court of British Columbia and the Court of Appeal of British Columbia as the exclusive forum for certain litigation, however, it is uncertain whether such provision would apply to actions arising under U.S. federal securities laws, and if it does, whether a British Columbia Court would enforce such provision given that investors cannot waive compliance by us with U.S. federal securities laws. If the forum selection provision does in fact apply to a cause of actions arising under U.S. federal securities laws and a British Columbia court were to enforce Article 30 of our Articles, it is nevertheless true that investors cannot waive compliance by us with U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, which would seemingly include procedural and therefore likely jurisdictional provisions. It also remains uncertain as to whether a breach of U.S. securities law in and of itself would give rise to a direct cause of action in British Columbia. We believe that if a British Columbia Court were to enforce Article 30 of our Articles in an action brought by an investor against us under U.S. federal securities laws, the investor would be obliged to bring such action in a British Columbia Court and prove U.S. federal securities laws by expert evidence in such an action.

 

144

 

 

CERTAIN CANADIAN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

 

In the opinion of DLA Piper (Canada) LLP, Canadian counsel to the Company, the following is a general summary, as of the date hereof, of the principal Canadian federal income tax considerations under the Tax Act generally applicable to an investor who, as beneficial owner, acquires Fixed Shares or Floating Shares qualified for sale by this Prospectus, as capital property and deals at arm’s length with the Company and is not affiliated with the Company (a “Holder”). Generally, the Fixed Shares and Floating Shares will be considered to be capital property to a Holder unless they are held or acquired in the course of carrying on a business of trading in or dealing in securities or as part of an adventure or concern in the nature of trade. In this summary, the Fixed Shares and Floating Shares are collectively referred to as the “Subordinate Voting Shares”.

 

This summary is based on the facts set out in this Prospectus, the current provisions of the Tax Act (including the regulations thereunder), all specific proposals to amend the Tax Act publicly announced by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance (Canada) (“Tax Proposals”) before the date of this Prospectus, the current published administrative policies and assessing practices of the Canada Revenue Agency and the Canada - United States Tax Convention (1980), as amended (the “Treaty”). No assurance can be made that the Tax Proposals will be enacted in the form proposed or at all. This summary is not exhaustive of all possible Canadian federal income tax considerations and, except as mentioned above, does not take into account or anticipate any changes in law or administrative policy or assessing practice, whether by legislative, regulatory, administrative or judicial decision or action, nor does it take into account provincial, or foreign income tax legislation or considerations, which may differ significantly from the Canadian federal income tax considerations discussed herein.

 

The Company is a Canadian corporation for purposes of the Tax Act. As referenced under “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” and under “Risk Factors – United States Tax Classification of the Company”, the Company is also classified as a U.S. domestic corporation for United States federal income tax purposes, with related consequences and potential consequences to the Company and its shareholders. Accordingly, all prospective purchasers, including Holders as defined above, should review the discussion under “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” and under “Risk Factors – United States Tax Classification of the Company”, and consult with their own tax advisors in this regard before purchasing Subordinate Voting Shares. For the purposes of the discussion of Canadian federal income tax considerations below, it has been assumed that the Company is and will be classified as a U.S. domestic corporation for United States federal income tax purposes at all relevant times. No legal opinion or tax ruling has been sought or obtained in this regard or with respect to any other assumptions made for purposes of this summary.

 

This summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular Holder, and no representation concerning the tax consequences to any particular Holder or prospective Holder are made. Accordingly, prospective Holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to an investment in the Offering having regard to their particular circumstances.

 

Holders Resident in Canada

 

This portion of the summary applies to a Holder who, for purposes of the Tax Act and at all relevant times, is or is deemed to be a resident of Canada (a “Canadian Holder”). Canadian Holders whose Subordinate Voting Shares do not otherwise qualify as capital property may in certain circumstances make an irrevocable election in accordance with subsection 39(4) of the Tax Act to have their Subordinate Voting Shares and every other “Canadian security” (as defined in the Tax Act) owned by such Canadian Holder in the taxation year of the election and in all subsequent taxation years deemed to be capital property. Canadian Holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to whether the election is available and advisable in their particular circumstances.

 

This summary is not applicable to: (a) a Canadian Holder that is a “financial institution”, as defined in the Tax Act for purposes of the mark-to-market rules, (b) a Canadian Holder, an interest in which would be a “tax shelter investment” as defined in the Tax Act, (c) a Canadian Holder that is a “specified financial institution” as defined in the Tax Act, or (d) a Canadian Holder which has made an election under the Tax Act to determine its Canadian tax results in a foreign currency. This summary does not apply to a Canadian Holder who has entered or will enter into a “derivative forward agreement” or “synthetic disposition arrangement” under the Tax Act with respect to the Subordinate Voting Shares. This summary does not address the possible application of the “foreign affiliate dumping” rules that may be applicable to a Canadian Holder that is a corporation resident in Canada (for the purposes of the Tax Act) and is, or becomes, or does not deal at arm’s length with a corporation resident in Canada that is, or that becomes as part of a transaction or event or series of transactions or events that includes the acquisition of the Subordinate Voting Shares, controlled by a non-resident corporation (or pursuant to the Proposed Amendments, a non-resident person or a group of persons comprised of any combination of non-resident corporations, non-resident individuals or non-resident trusts that do not deal with each other at arm's length), for purposes of the rules in section 212.3 of the Tax Act. Any such Canadian Holder to which this summary does not apply should consult its own tax advisor with respect to the tax consequences of the Offering.

 

For purposes of the Tax Act, all amounts relating to the acquisition, holding or disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares (including dividends, adjusted cost base and proceeds of disposition) must generally be expressed in Canadian Dollars. Amounts denominated in any other currency must be converted into Canadian Dollars generally based on the exchange rate quoted by the Bank of Canada on the date such amounts arise or such other rate of exchange as is acceptable to the Minister of National Revenue (Canada).

 

145

 

 

Dividends on Subordinate Voting Shares

 

In the case of a Canadian Holder who is an individual, dividends received or deemed to be received on the Subordinate Voting Shares will be included in computing the Canadian Holder’s income and will be subject to the gross-up and dividend tax credit rules that apply to taxable dividends received from taxable Canadian corporations. Provided that appropriate designations are made by the Company, any such dividend will be treated as an “eligible dividend” for the purposes of the Tax Act and a Canadian Holder who is an individual will be entitled to an enhanced dividend tax credit in respect of such dividend. There may be limitations on the Company’s ability to designate dividends and deemed dividends as eligible dividends.

 

Dividends received or deemed to be received on the Subordinate Voting Shares by a Canadian Holder that is a corporation will be required to be included in computing the corporation’s income for the taxation year in which such dividends are received, but such dividends will generally be deductible in computing the corporation’s taxable income. In certain circumstances, subsection 55(2) of the Tax Act will treat a taxable dividend received by a Canadian Holder that is a corporation as proceeds of disposition or a capital gain. Canadian Holders that are corporations should consult their own tax advisors having regard to their own circumstances.

 

A Canadian Holder that is a “private corporation” or a “subject corporation” (each as defined in the Tax Act) may be liable under Part IV of the Tax Act to pay a refundable tax on dividends received or deemed to be received on the Subordinate Voting Shares to the extent that such dividends are deductible in computing the Canadian Holder’s taxable income for the taxation year.

 

Dividends received by a Canadian Holder who is an individual (including certain trusts) may result in such Canadian Holder being liable for alternative minimum tax under the Tax Act. Canadian Holders who are individuals should consult their own tax advisors in this regard.

 

As the Company is treated as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes pursuant to section 7874 of the Code, a Canadian Holder may be subject to United States withholding tax on dividends received on the Subordinate Voting Shares (see “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations”). Any United States withholding tax paid by or on behalf of a Canadian Holder in respect of dividends received on the Subordinate Voting Shares by a Canadian Holder may be eligible for foreign tax credit or deduction treatment where applicable under the Tax Act. Generally, a foreign tax credit in respect of a tax paid to a particular foreign country is limited to the Canadian tax otherwise payable in respect of income sourced in that country. Dividends received on the Subordinate Voting Shares by a Canadian Holder may not be treated as income sourced in the United States for these purposes. Canadian Holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the availability of any foreign tax credits or deductions under the Tax Act in respect of any United States withholding tax applicable to dividends on the Subordinate Voting Shares.

 

Dispositions of Subordinate Voting Shares

 

Upon a disposition or deemed disposition of a Subordinate Voting Share, a capital gain (or loss) will generally be realized by a Canadian Holder to the extent that the proceeds of disposition are greater (or less) than the aggregate of the adjusted cost base of such Subordinate Voting Share to the Canadian Holder immediately before the disposition and any reasonable costs of disposition. The adjusted cost base of a Subordinate Voting Share to a Canadian Holder will be determined in accordance with the Tax Act by averaging the cost to the Canadian Holder of a Subordinate Voting Share with the adjusted cost base of all other Subordinate Voting Shares held by the Canadian Holder as capital property. Such capital gain (or capital loss) will be subject to the treatment described below under “Holders Resident in Canada — Taxation of Capital Gains and Capital Losses”.

 

Taxation of Capital Gains and Capital Losses

 

Generally, one-half of any capital gain realized by a Canadian Holder in a taxation year will be included in computing the Canadian Holder’s income in that taxation year (a “taxable capital gain”) and, generally, one-half of any capital loss realized in a taxation year (an “allowable capital loss”) must be deducted from the taxable capital gains realized by the Canadian Holder in the same taxation year, in accordance with the rules contained in the Tax Act. Allowable capital losses in excess of taxable capital gains realized by a Canadian Holder in a particular taxation year may be carried back and deducted in any of the three preceding taxation years or carried forward and deducted in any subsequent taxation year against net taxable capital gains realized by the Canadian Holder in such taxation year, subject to and in accordance with the rules contained in the Tax Act.

 

Capital gains realized by an individual and certain trusts may give rise to a liability for alternative minimum tax under the Tax Act. A Canadian Holder that is, throughout the year, a “Canadian-controlled private corporation”, as defined in the Tax Act, may be subject to an additional refundable tax on its “aggregate investment income” which is defined to include taxable capital gains.

 

The amount of any capital loss realized by a Canadian Holder that is a corporation on the disposition of a Subordinate Voting Share may be reduced by the amount of dividends received or deemed to be received by it on such share (or on a share for which the share has been substituted) to the extent and under the circumstances prescribed by the Tax Act. Similar rules may apply where a corporation is a member of a partnership or a beneficiary of a trust that owns shares, directly or indirectly, through a partnership or a trust. Canadian Holders to whom these rules may apply should consult their own tax advisors.

 

146

 

 

As the Company is treated as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes pursuant to section 7874 of the Code, a Canadian Holder may be subject to United States tax on a gain realized on the disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares if the Company is classified as a USRPHC under the Code. United States tax, if any, levied on any gain realized on a disposition of a Subordinate Voting Share may be eligible for a foreign tax credit under the Tax Act to the extent and under the circumstances described in the Tax Act. Generally, a foreign tax credit in respect of a tax paid to a particular foreign country is limited to the Canadian tax otherwise payable in respect of income sourced in that country. Gains realized on the disposition of a Subordinate Voting Share by a Canadian Holder may not be treated as income sourced in the United States for these purposes. Canadian Holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the availability of a foreign tax credit, having regard to their own particular circumstances. See also “Certain United States Income Tax Considerations” and “Risk Factors – United States Tax Classification of the Company”.

 

Non-Canadian Holders

 

This section of the summary applies to a Holder who, for the purposes of the Tax Act and any applicable income tax treaty or convention, and at all relevant times, is not, and is not deemed to be, resident in Canada, and does not use or hold, and is not deemed to use or hold, the Subordinate Voting Shares in the course of carrying on a business in Canada (a “Non-Canadian Holder”). This section does not apply to an insurer who carries on an insurance business in Canada and elsewhere or an “authorized foreign bank” (as defined in the Tax Act). Such Non-Canadian Holders should consult their own tax advisors.

 

Dividends on Subordinate Voting Shares

 

Dividends paid or credited or deemed to be paid or credited to a Non-Canadian Holder on the Subordinate Voting Shares will be subject to Canadian withholding tax. The Tax Act imposes withholding tax at a rate of 25% on the gross amount of the dividend, although such rate may be reduced by virtue of an applicable tax treaty. For example, under the Treaty, where dividends on the Subordinate Voting Shares are considered to be paid to a Non-Canadian Holder that is the beneficial owner of the dividends and is a U.S. resident for the purposes of, and is entitled to all of the benefits of, the Treaty, the applicable rate of Canadian withholding tax is generally reduced to 15%. The Company will be required to withhold the applicable withholding tax from any dividend and remit it to the Canadian government for the Non-Canadian Holder’s account.

 

Dispositions of Subordinate Voting Shares

 

A Non-Canadian Holder who disposes of or is deemed to have disposed of a Subordinate Voting Share will not be subject to income tax under the Tax Act unless the Subordinate Voting Share is, or is deemed to be, “taxable Canadian property” (as defined in the Tax Act) of the Non-Canadian Holder at the time of disposition and the Non-Canadian Holder is not entitled to relief under an applicable income tax treaty or convention between Canada and the country of residence of the Non-Canadian Holder.

 

Generally, provided that the Subordinate Voting Shares are, at the time of disposition, listed on a “designated stock exchange” (which currently includes the CSE), the Subordinate Voting Shares will not constitute taxable Canadian property of a Non-Canadian Holder unless, at any time during the 60-month period immediately preceding the disposition the following two conditions were met: (i) 25% or more of the issued shares of any class or series of the capital stock of the Company were owned by one or any combination of (a) the Non-Canadian Holder, (b) persons with whom the Non-Canadian Holder did not deal at arm’s length (for the purposes of the Tax Act), and (c) partnerships in which the Non-Canadian Holder or a person described in (b) holds a membership interest directly or indirectly through one or more partnerships; and (ii) more than 50% of the fair market value of such shares was derived, directly or indirectly, from one or any combination of: (a) real or immovable property situated in Canada, (b) Canadian resource property (as defined in the Tax Act), (c) timber resource property (as defined in the Tax Act) or (d) options in respect of, or interests in any of, the foregoing property, whether or not such property exists. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Subordinate Voting Shares may otherwise be deemed to be taxable Canadian property to a Non-Canadian Holder for purposes of the Tax Act in certain circumstances. Non-Canadian Holders for whom the Subordinate Voting Shares are, or may be, taxable Canadian property should consult their own tax advisors.

 

In the event that a Subordinate Voting Share constitutes taxable Canadian property of a Non-Canadian Holder and any capital gain that would be realized on the disposition thereof is not exempt from tax under the Tax Act pursuant to an applicable income tax treaty or convention, the income tax consequences discussed above for Canadian Holders under “Dispositions of Subordinate Voting Shares” will generally apply to the Non-Canadian Holder. Non-Canadian Holders should consult their own tax advisor in this regard.

 

ELIGIBILITY FOR INVESTMENT

 

In the opinion of DLA Piper (Canada) LLP, Canadian counsel to the Company, based on the current provisions of the Tax Act, the Fixed Shares and the Floating Shares, if issued on the date hereof, would be "qualified investments" under the Tax Act for trusts governed by a registered retirement savings plan, registered retirement income fund, tax-free savings account, registered education savings plan, registered disability savings plan (collectively referred to as "Registered Plans") and a deferred profit sharing plan, provided that the Fixed Shares and the Floating Shares are listed on a designated stock exchange for the purposes of the Tax Act (which currently includes the CSE).

 

147

 

 

Notwithstanding that a Fixed Share or Floating Share may be a qualified investment for a Registered Plan, if the Fixed Share or Floating Share is a "prohibited investment" within the meaning of the Tax Act for the Registered Plan, the holder, annuitant or subscriber of the Registered Plan, as the case may be, will be subject to penalty taxes as set out in the Tax Act. The Fixed Shares and Floating Shares will not generally be a "prohibited investment" for a Registered Plan if the holder, annuitant or subscriber, as the case may be, (i) deals at arm's length with the Company for the purposes of the Tax Act and (ii) does not have a "significant interest" (as defined in the Tax Act) in the Company. In addition, the Fixed Shares and Floating Shares will not be a "prohibited investment" if they are "excluded property" within the meaning of the Tax Act, for the Registered Plan.

 

Holders, annuitants and subscribers of Registered Plans should consult their own tax advisors with respect to whether Fixed Shares or Floating Shares would be a prohibited investment having regard to their particular circumstances.

 

148

 

 

CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

 

The following is a general summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of (i) Warrants and (ii) Fixed Shares or Floating Shares that are issued upon the exercise of Warrants (“Warrant Shares”) that are applicable to U.S. Holders and certain Non-U.S. Holders (as defined below), that own Warrants or Warrant Shares. This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury regulations promulgated under the Code (“Treasury Regulations”), administrative pronouncements or practices and judicial decisions, all as of the date hereof. Future legislative, judicial, or administrative modifications, revocations, or interpretations, which may or may not be retroactive, may result in U.S. federal income tax consequences significantly different from those discussed herein. This discussion is not binding on the IRS. No ruling has been or will be sought or obtained from the IRS with respect to any of the U.S. federal tax consequences discussed herein. There can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge any of the conclusions described herein or that a U.S. court will not sustain such a challenge. This summary assumes that the Warrants are held as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment), in the hands of a warrant holder at all relevant times and the Warrant Shares to be issued upon the exercise of the Warrants would be capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code.

 

This summary does not address U.S. federal income tax consequences to holders subject to special rules, including holders that (i) are banks, financial institutions, or insurance companies; (ii) are regulated investment companies or real estate investment trusts; (iii) are brokers, dealers, or traders in securities or currencies; (iv) are tax-exempt organizations; (v) hold the Warrants or Warrant Shares as part of hedges, straddles, constructive sales, conversion transactions, or other integrated investments; (vi) acquire the Warrants or Warrant Shares as compensation for services or through the exercise or cancellation of employee stock options or warrants; (vii) have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar; or (viii) are U.S. expatriates. In addition, this discussion does not address any U.S. federal estate, gift, or other non-income tax, or any state, local, or non-U.S. tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of the Warrants or Warrant Shares or the impact of the alternative minimum tax.

 

If an entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds the Warrants, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in such partnership generally will depend on the status of such partner and on the activities of the partner and the partnership. A person that is a partner of an entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes where such entity holds the Warrants or Warrant Shares is urged to consult its tax advisor.

 

THIS DISCUSSION IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TAX ADVICE. PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX RULES TO THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES AS WELL AS THE STATE, LOCAL, AND NON-U.S. TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF WARRANTS OR WARRANT SHARES.

 

U.S. Holders

 

The discussion in this section is addressed to a holder of Warrants or Warrant Shares that is a “U.S. Holder” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As used herein, “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of Warrants or Warrant Shares that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (i) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States; (ii) a corporation created or organized under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, including any State thereof and the District of Columbia; (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or (iv) a trust that (a) is subject to the primary jurisdiction of a court within the United States and for which one or more U.S. persons have authority to control all substantial decisions or (b) has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

 

Tax Classification of the Company as a U.S. Domestic Corporation

 

A corporation is generally considered for U.S. federal income tax purposes to be a tax resident in the jurisdiction of its organization or incorporation. Accordingly, under the generally applicable U.S. federal income tax rules, the Company, which is incorporated under the laws of Canada, would be classified as a non-U.S. corporation (and, therefore, not a U.S. tax resident) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, Section 7874 of the Code, provides an exception to this general rule, under which a non-U.S. incorporated entity may, in certain circumstances, be treated as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. These rules are complex and there is limited guidance regarding their application.

 

Under Section 7874, a corporation created or organized outside the United States (i.e., a non-U.S. corporation) will nevertheless be treated as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes (and, therefore, as a U.S. tax resident subject to U.S. federal income tax on its worldwide income) if each of the following three conditions are met: (i) the non-U.S. corporation, directly or indirectly, acquires substantially all of the properties held directly or indirectly by a U.S. corporation or partnership (including through the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares or interests of the U.S. corporation or partnership (including a limited liability company classified as a partnership); (ii) the non-U.S. corporation’s “expanded affiliated group” does not have “substantial business activities” in the non-U.S. corporation’s country of organization or incorporation and tax residence relative to the expanded affiliated group’s worldwide activities; and (iii) after the acquisition, the former shareholders or owners of the acquired U.S. corporation or partnership hold at least 80% (by either vote or value) of the shares of the non-U.S. acquiring corporation by reason of holding shares or interest in the U.S. acquired corporation or partnership (taking into account the receipt of the non-U.S. corporation’s shares in exchange for the U.S. corporation’s or partnership shares or interests) as determined for purposes of Section 7874 (this test is referred to as the ”80% ownership test”).

 

149

 

 

 For purposes of Section 7874, the Company believes that the three conditions described above have been met by reason of the RTO, and the Company has taken the position that it is treated as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A number of significant and complicated U.S. federal income tax consequences may result from such classification, and this summary does not attempt to describe all such U.S. federal income tax consequences. Section 7874 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder do not address all the possible tax consequences that arise from the Company being treated as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, there may be additional or unforeseen U.S. federal income tax consequences to the Company that are not discussed in this summary.

 

Generally, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its worldwide taxable income (regardless of whether such income is “U.S. source” or “foreign source”) and will be required to file a U.S. federal income tax return annually with the IRS. The Company is subject to tax in Canada. It is unclear how the foreign tax credit rules under the Code will operate in certain circumstances, given the treatment of the Company as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and the taxation of the Company in Canada. Accordingly, it is possible that the Company will be subject to double taxation with respect to all or part of its taxable income. It is anticipated that such U.S. and Canadian tax treatment will continue indefinitely and that the Warrant Shares will be treated indefinitely as shares in a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, notwithstanding future transfers.

 

Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders

 

Exercise, Sale, Redemption or Expiration of Warrant

 

Generally, no U.S. federal income tax will be imposed upon the U.S. Holder of a Warrant upon exercise of such Warrant to acquire Warrant Shares. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in a Warrant will generally be the amount of the purchase price that was paid for or allocated to the Warrant. Upon exercise of a Warrant, the tax basis of the Warrant Shares acquired thereby would be equal to the sum of the tax basis of the Warrant in the hands of the U.S. Holder plus the exercise price paid, and the holding period of the Warrant Shares would begin on the date following the date that the Warrant is exercised (or possibly the date of exercise) and will not include the period during which the U.S. Holder held the Warrant.

 

In general, if you are a U.S. Holder of a Warrant, you will recognize gain or loss upon the sale or other taxable disposition of the Warrant (provided that the Warrant Shares to be issued on the exercise of such Warrant would have been a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code if acquired by the U.S. Holder) in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale and your adjusted tax basis in the Warrant. If a Warrant lapses without exercise, the U.S. Holder will generally realize a capital loss equal to its tax basis in the Warrant.

 

Prospective U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of acquiring, holding, exercising and disposing of Warrants.

 

Distributions

 

The Company does not anticipate declaring or paying dividends to holders of Warrant Shares in the foreseeable future. However, if the Company decides to make any such distributions, such distributions with respect to Warrant Shares will be taxable as dividend income when paid to the extent of the Company’s current or accumulated earnings and profits as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. To the extent that the amount of a distribution with respect to the Company’s Warrant Shares exceeds its current and accumulated earnings and profits, such distribution will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Warrant Shares, and thereafter as a capital gain which will be a long-term capital gain if the U.S. Holder has held such stock at the time of the distribution for more than one year. Distributions on the Company’s Warrant Shares constituting dividend income paid to U.S. Holders that are U.S. corporations may qualify for the dividends received deduction, subject to various limitations. Distributions on Company’s Warrant Shares constituting dividend income paid to U.S. Holders that are individuals may qualify for the reduced rates applicable to qualified dividend income.

 

Sale or Redemption

 

A U.S. Holder will generally recognize capital gain or loss on a sale, exchange, redemption (other than a redemption that is treated as a dividend) or other disposition of the Company’s Warrant Shares equal to the difference between the amount realized upon the disposition and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares so disposed. Such capital gain or loss will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the shares disposed of exceeds one year at the time of disposition. Long-term capital gains of non-corporate taxpayers are generally taxed at a lower maximum marginal tax rate than the maximum marginal tax rate applicable to ordinary income. The deductibility of net capital losses by individuals and corporations is subject to limitations.

 

150

 

 

 Additional Tax on Net Investment Income

 

Certain U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates and trusts are required to pay a 3.8 percent tax on “net investment income” (or in the case of an estate or trust, “undistributed net investment income”), which generally includes, among other things, dividends on, and capital gains from the sale or other disposition of, the stocks and securities, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. You are urged to consult your own tax advisors regarding the applicability of this additional tax to your ownership and disposition of Warrant Shares and Warrants.

 

Foreign Tax Credit Limitations

 

Because the Company is subject to tax both as a U.S. domestic corporation and as a Canadian corporation, a U.S. Holder may pay, through withholding, Canadian tax, as well as U.S. federal income tax, with respect to dividends paid on its Warrant Shares. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. Holder may elect for any taxable year to receive either a credit or a deduction for all foreign income taxes paid by the holder during the year. Complex limitations apply to the foreign tax credit, including a general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of a taxpayer’s U.S. federal income tax that the taxpayer’s foreign source taxable income bears to the taxpayer’s worldwide taxable income. In applying this limitation, items of income and deduction must be classified, under complex rules, as either foreign source or U.S. source. The status of the Company as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes will cause dividends paid by the Company to be treated as U.S. source rather than foreign source income for this purpose. As a result, a foreign tax credit may be unavailable for any Canadian tax paid on dividends received from the Company. Similarly, to the extent a sale or disposition of Warrants or Warrant Shares by a U.S. Holder results in Canadian tax payable by the U.S. Holder (for example, because the Warrants or Warrant Shares constitute taxable Canadian property within the meaning of the Tax Act), a U.S. foreign tax credit may be unavailable to the U.S. Holder for such Canadian tax. In each case, however, the U.S. Holder may be able to take a deduction for the U.S. Holder’s Canadian tax paid, provided that the U.S. Holder has not elected to credit other foreign taxes during the same taxable year. The foreign tax credit rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding these rules.

 

Foreign Currency

 

The amount of any distribution paid to a U.S. Holder in foreign currency, or the amount of proceeds paid in foreign currency on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of Warrants or Warrant Shares, generally will be equal to the U.S. dollar value of such foreign currency based on the exchange rate applicable on the date of receipt (regardless of whether such foreign currency is converted into U.S. dollars at that time). A U.S. Holder will have a basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt. Any U.S. Holder who converts or otherwise disposes of the foreign currency after the date of receipt may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as ordinary income or loss, and generally will be U.S. source income or loss for foreign tax credit purposes. Different rules apply to U.S. Holders who use the accrual method of tax accounting. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own U.S. tax advisors.

 

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

 

Information returns will be filed with the IRS in connection with payments of dividends and the proceeds from a sale or other disposition of Warrant or Warrants Shares payable to a U.S. Holder that is not an exempt recipient, such as a corporation. Certain U.S. Holders may be subject to backup withholding with respect to the payment of dividends on Warrant Shares and to certain payments of proceeds on the sale or redemption of Warrants or Warrant Shares unless such U.S. Holders provide proof of an applicable exemption or a correct taxpayer identification number, and otherwise comply with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules.

 

Any amount withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a U.S. Holder is allowable as a credit against such U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax, which may entitle the U.S. Holder to a refund, provided that the U.S. Holder timely provides the required information to the IRS. Moreover, certain penalties may be imposed by the IRS on a U.S. Holder who is required to furnish information but does not do so in the proper manner. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the application of backup withholding in their particular circumstances and the availability of and procedure for obtaining an exemption from backup withholding under current Treasury Regulations.

 

Non-U.S. Holders

 

The discussion in this section is addressed to holders of Warrants and Warrant Shares that are “Non-U.S. Holders” that do not hold Warrants or Warrant Shares in connection with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. For purposes of this discussion, a “Non-U.S. Holder” is any beneficial owner of the Company’s Warrants or Warrant Shares that is neither a “U.S. Holder” nor an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 

Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. Holders

 

Exercise, Sale or Redemption of Warrant

 

Generally, no U.S. federal income tax will be imposed upon the Non-U.S. Holder of a Warrant upon exercise of such Warrant to acquire Warrant Shares. A Non-U.S. Holder’s tax basis in a Warrant will generally be the amount of the purchase price that was allocated to the Warrant. Upon exercise of a Warrant, the tax basis of the Warrant Shares acquired thereby would be equal to the sum of the tax basis of the Warrant in the hands of the Non-U.S. Holder plus the exercise price paid, and the holding period of the Warrant Shares would begin on the date following the date that the Warrant is exercised (or possibly the date of exercise) and will not include the period during which the U.S. Holder held the Warrant.

 

151

 

 

In general, if you are a Non-U.S. Holder of a Warrant, the tax consequences of the sale or redemption of a Warrant should be the same as described below under “Non-U.S. Holders — Sale or Redemption” related to the sale or redemption of Warrant Shares.

 

Prospective Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of acquiring, holding, exercising and disposing of Warrants.

 

Distributions

 

Generally, distributions treated as dividends as described above under “U.S. Holders — Distributions” paid to a Non-U.S. Holder of the Company’s Warrant Shares will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at a rate of 30% of the gross amount of the dividends (or such lower rate specified by an applicable income tax treaty, provided the Non-U.S. Holder furnishes a valid IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E, or other applicable documentation, certifying qualification for the lower treaty rate). A Non-U.S. Holder that does not timely furnish the required documentation for a reduced treaty rate, but that qualifies for a reduced treaty rate, may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by timely filing an appropriate claim for refund with the IRS. Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding their entitlement to benefits under any applicable income tax treaty.

 

Sale or Redemption

 

Subject to the discussions below under “Non-U.S. Holders – Information Reporting and Backup Withholding” and “Additional Withholding Tax on Payments Made to Foreign Accounts”, a Non-U.S. Holder will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain realized upon the sale or other taxable disposition of the Company’s Warrant Shares unless:

 

· the Non-U.S. Holder is a non-resident alien individual present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year of the disposition and certain other requirements are met; or

· Warrant Shares constitutes a U.S. real property interest, or USRPI, by reason of Company’s status as a U.S. real property holding corporation, or USRPHC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 

Gain described in the first bullet point above will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 30% (or such lower rate specified by an applicable income tax treaty), which may be offset by U.S. source capital losses of the Non-U.S. Holder (even though the individual is not considered a resident of the United States), provided the Non-U.S. Holder has timely filed U.S. federal income tax returns with respect to such losses.

 

With respect to the second bullet point above, the Company believes it currently is not, and does not anticipate becoming, a USRPHC. Because the determination of whether the Company is a USRPHC depends, however, on the fair market value of Company’s USRPIs relative to the fair market value of the Company’s non-U.S. real property interests and other business assets, there can be no assurance the Company currently is not a USRPHC or will not become one in the future. Even if the Company is or were to become a USRPHC, gain arising from the sale or other taxable disposition by a Non-U.S. Holder of the Company’s Warrant Shares will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax if the Warrant Shares are “regularly traded”, as defined by applicable Treasury Regulations, on an established securities market, and such Non-U.S. Holder owned, actually and constructively, 5% or less of the Warrant Shares throughout the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of the sale or other taxable disposition or the Non-U.S. Holder’s holding period.

 

Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding potentially applicable income tax treaties that may provide for different rules.

 

Information Reporting and Withholding

 

Payments of dividends on the Company’s Warrant Shares will not be subject to withholding, provided the applicable withholding agent does not have actual knowledge or reason to know the holder is a United States person and the holder either certifies its non-U.S. status, such as by furnishing a valid IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E, or otherwise establishes an exemption. However, information returns are required to be filed with the IRS in connection with any dividends on the Company’s Warrant Shares paid to the Non-U.S. Holder, regardless of whether any tax was actually withheld. In addition, proceeds of the sale or other taxable disposition of the Company’s Warrants or Warrant Shares within the United States or conducted through certain U.S.-related brokers generally will not be subject to withholding or information reporting, if the applicable withholding agent receives the certification described above and does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that such holder is a United States person, or the holder otherwise establishes an exemption. Proceeds of a disposition of Warrants or Warrant Shares conducted through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker generally will not be subject to withholding or information reporting.

 

Copies of information returns that are filed with the IRS may also be made available under the provisions of an applicable treaty or agreement to the tax authorities of the country in which the Non-U.S. Holder resides or is established.

 

152

 

 

Withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against a Non-U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

 

Additional Withholding Tax on Payments Made to Foreign Accounts

 

Withholding taxes may be imposed under Sections 1471 to 1474 of the Code (such Sections commonly referred to as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or “FATCA”) on certain types of payments made to non-U.S. financial institutions and certain other non-U.S. entities. Specifically, a 30% withholding tax may be imposed on dividends on, or gross proceeds from the sale or other disposition of, the Company’s Warrant Shares paid to a “foreign financial institution” or a “non-financial foreign entity” (each as defined in the Code), unless (1) the foreign financial institution undertakes certain diligence and reporting obligations, (2) the non-financial foreign entity either certifies it does not have any “substantial United States owners”, as defined in the Code, or furnishes identifying information regarding each substantial United States owner, or (3) the foreign financial institution or non-financial foreign entity otherwise qualifies for an exemption from these rules. If the payee is a foreign financial institution and is subject to the diligence and reporting requirements in (1) above, it must enter into an agreement with the U.S. Department of the Treasury requiring, among other things, that it undertake to identify accounts held by certain “specified United States persons” or “United States-owned foreign entities” (each as defined in the Code), annually report certain information about such accounts, and withhold 30% on certain payments to non-compliant foreign financial institutions and certain other account holders. Foreign financial institutions located in jurisdictions that have an intergovernmental agreement with the United States governing FATCA may be subject to different rules.

 

Under the applicable Treasury Regulations and administrative guidance, withholding under FATCA generally applies to payments of dividends on the Company’s Warrant Shares. While withholding under FATCA would have also applied to payments of gross proceeds from the sale or other disposition of the Warrants and Warrant Shares on or after January 1, 2019, recently proposed Treasury Regulations eliminate FATCA withholding on payments of gross proceeds entirely. Taxpayers generally may rely on these proposed Treasury Regulations until final Treasury Regulations are issued.

 

Investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the potential application of withholding under FATCA to their investment in Warrants or Warrant Shares.

 

153

 

 

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

 

Our transfer agent and registrar is Odyssey Trust Company located at 835 - 409 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1T2.

 

LEGAL MATTERS

 

Certain Canadian legal matters in connection with the offering of Fixed Shares or Floating Shares will be passed upon on behalf of Acreage by DLA Piper (Canada) LLP.

 

EXPERTS

 

The following persons or companies are named as having prepared or certified a report, valuation, statement or opinion directly in this Prospectus, and whose profession or business gives authority to the report, valuation, statement or opinion made by the expert.

 

Marcum LLP is our independent registered public accounting firm, and audited our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

 

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. This Prospectus is part of a registration statement and, as permitted by SEC rules, does not contain all of the information included in the registration statement. Whenever a reference is made in this Prospectus to any of our contracts or other documents, the reference may not be complete and, for a copy of the contract or document, you should refer to the exhibits that are part of the registration statement. Our SEC filings and information omitted from this Prospectus but contained in the Registration Statement is available on our profile at www.sec.gov.

 

154

 

 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F- 2
   
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 F-3
   
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 F-4
   
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 F-5
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 F-6
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-8

 

F-1

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of

Acreage Holdings, Inc.

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Acreage Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”).

 

In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Change in Accounting Principle

 

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases, effective January 1, 2019, due to the adoption of the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 842, Leases.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

/s/ Marcum LLP

Marcum LLP

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.

 

 

New York, NY

March 25, 2021

 

F-2

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

 

(in thousands)   December 31, 2020     December 31, 2019  
ASSETS                
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 32,542     $ 26,505  
Restricted cash     22,097       95  
Inventory     23,715       18,083  
Notes receivable, current     2,032       2,146  
Assets held-for-sale     62,971        
Other current assets     4,663       8,506  
Total current assets     148,020       55,335  
Long-term investments     34,126       4,499  
Notes receivable, non-current     97,901       79,479  
Capital assets, net     89,136       106,047  
Operating lease right-of-use assets     17,247       51,950  
Intangible assets, net     138,983       285,972  
Goodwill     31,922       105,757  
Other non-current assets     4,718       2,638  
Total non-current assets     414,033       636,342  
TOTAL ASSETS   $ 562,053     $ 691,677  
                 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   $ 18,913     $ 32,459  
Taxes payable     14,780       4,740  
Interest payable     3,504       291  
Operating lease liability, current     1,492       2,759  
Debt, current     27,139       15,300  
Non-refundable deposits on sale     750        
Liabilities related to assets held for sale     18,154        
Other current liabilities     13,010       1,604  
Total current liabilities     97,742       57,153  
Debt, non-current     153,318       28,186  
Operating lease liability, non-current     16,609       47,522  
Deferred tax liability     34,673       63,997  
Other liabilities     2       25  
Total non-current liabilities     204,602       139,730  
TOTAL LIABILITIES     302,344       196,883  
Commitments and contingencies                
Common stock, no par value - unlimited authorized, 101,250 and 90,646 issued and outstanding, respectively            
Additional paid-in capital     737,290       615,678  
Treasury stock, 842 common stock held in treasury     (21,054 )     (21,054 )
Accumulated deficit     (475,205 )     (188,617 )
Total Acreage Shareholders' equity     241,031       406,007  
Non-controlling interests     18,678       88,787  
TOTAL EQUITY     259,709       494,794  
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   $ 562,053     $ 691,677  

 

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-3

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

    Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands, except per share amounts)   2020     2019     2018  
Retail revenue, net   $ 86,380     $ 54,401     $ 17,475  
Wholesale revenue, net     27,971       18,539       2,969  
Other revenue, net     194       1,169       680  
Total revenues, net     114,545       74,109       21,124  
Cost of goods sold, retail     (51,018 )     (33,844 )     (10,038 )
Cost of goods sold, wholesale     (14,369 )     (9,821 )     (1,666 )
Total cost of goods sold     (65,387 )     (43,665 )     (11,704 )
Gross profit     49,158       30,444       9,420  
                         
OPERATING EXPENSES                        
General and administrative     50,469       56,224       18,647  
Compensation expense     41,704       42,061       15,356  
Equity-based compensation expense     92,064       97,538       11,230  
Marketing     1,820       5,009       1,571  
Loss on impairments     188,023       13,463        
Loss on notes receivable     8,161              
Write down of assets held-for-sale     11,003              
Loss on legal settlements     14,555              
Depreciation and amortization     6,170       7,593       3,749  
Total operating expenses     413,969       221,888       50,553  
                         
Net operating loss   $ (364,811 )   $ (191,444 )   $ (41,133 )
                         
Income (loss) from investments, net     98       (480 )     21,777  
Interest income from loans receivable     6,695       3,978       1,178  
Interest expense     (15,853 )     (1,194 )     (4,617 )
Other loss, net     (3,487 )     (1,033 )     (7,930 )
Total other (loss) income     (12,547 )     1,271       10,408  
                         
Loss before income taxes   $ (377,358 )   $ (190,173 )   $ (30,725 )
                         
Income tax benefit (expense)     17,240       (4,989 )     (1,536 )
                         
Net loss   $ (360,118 )   $ (195,162 )   $ (32,261 )
                         
Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interests     (73,530 )     (44,894 )     (4,778 )
                         
Net loss attributable to Acreage Holdings, Inc.   $ (286,588 )   $ (150,268 )   $ (27,483 )
                         
Net loss per share attributable to Acreage Holdings, Inc. - basic and diluted:   $ (2.87 )   $ (1.74 )   $ (0.41 )
                         
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted     99,980       86,185       66,699  

 

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-4

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

                Attributable to shareholders of the parent              
(in thousands)   LLC
Membership
Units
    Pubco Shares
(as converted)
    Share
Capital
    Treasury
Stock
    Accumulated
Deficit
    Shareholders’
Equity
    Non-controlling
Interests
    Total
Equity
 
December 31, 2017   $ 49,375     $     $ 29,454     $     $ (10,861 )   $ 18,593     $ 10,030     $ 28,623  
Issuance of Class D units     17,018             105,514                   105,514             105,514  
Issuance of Class E units, net     19,352             116,124                   116,124             116,124  
Interest expense settled with PIK units     330       66       1,912                   1,912             1,912  
Conversion of notes to equity     6,473             30,759                   30,759             30,759  
Issuance of warrants                 3,285                   3,285             3,285  
Issuance of Pubco shares in redemption of membership units     (66,820 )     65,978       280       (21,054 )           (20,774 )           (20,774 )
RTO-related issuances, net           12,626       298,004                   298,004             298,004  
Formation of NCI at RTO and adjustments for changes in ownership     (27,340 )           (133,943 )                 (133,943 )     133,943        
Establishment of deferred tax liability due to RTO                 (30,175 )                 (30,175 )           (30,175 )
Capital contributions, net                                         2,767       2,767  
Increase in non-controlling interests from business acquisitions                                         7,241       7,241  
Purchase of non-controlling interests                 (21,798 )                 (21,798 )     (12,305 )     (34,103 )
Other equity transactions           398       4,426             (5 )     4,421       (5,976 )     (1,555 )
Equity-based compensation expense and related issuances     1,612       96       10,915                   10,915             10,915  
Net loss                             (27,483 )     (27,483 )     (4,778 )     (32,261 )
December 31, 2018   $     $ 79,164     $ 414,757     $ (21,054 )   $ (38,349 )   $ 355,354     $ 130,922     $ 486,276  
Issuances for business acquisitions/purchases of intangible assets           5,364       104,748                   104,748       4,356       109,104  
NCI adjustments for changes in ownership           2,784       (2,766 )                 (2,766 )     2,766        
Capital distributions, net                                         (4,363 )     (4,363 )
Other equity transactions           589       11,707                   11,707             11,707  
Equity-based compensation expense and related issuances           2,745       87,232                   87,232             87,232  
Net loss                             (150,268 )     (150,268 )     (44,894 )     (195,162 )
December 31, 2019   $     $ 90,646     $ 615,678     $ (21,054 )   $ (188,617 )   $ 406,007     $ 88,787     $ 494,794  
Issuances for private placement           6,085       27,887                   27,887             27,887  
Beneficial conversion feature on convertible note (See Note 10)                 523                   523             523  
Issuances on conversion of debenture           327       550                   550             550  
Issuance of warrants                 3,229                   3,229             3,229  
NCI adjustments for changes in ownership     3,861       583       (3,395 )                 (3,395 )     3,395        
Capital contributions, net                                         26       26  
Other equity transactions           276       754                   754             754  
Equity-based compensation expense and related issuances           3,333       92,064                   92,064             92,064  
Net loss                             (286,588 )     (286,588 )     (73,530 )     (360,118 )
December 31, 2020   $ 3,861     $ 101,250     $ 737,290     $ (21,054 )   $ (475,205 )   $ 241,031     $ 18,678     $ 259,709  

 

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-5

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

    Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)   2020     2019     2018  
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                        
Net loss   $ (360,118 )   $ (195,162 )   $ (32,261 )
Adjustments for:                        
Depreciation and amortization     6,170       7,593       3,749  
Equity-settled expenses, including compensation     92,818       102,898       19,360  
Gain on business divestiture     (217 )            
Gain on sale of investment                 (1,500 )
Loss on disposal of capital assets     2,461       363        
Loss on impairment     188,023       13,463        
Loss on notes receivable     8,161              
Bad debt expense     195              
Non-cash interest expense     7,023       67       2,838  
Non-cash operating lease expense     122       1,684        
Deferred tax (income) expense     (32,405 )     (3,844 )     (56 )
Non-cash loss from investments, net     949       1,272       (19,340 )
Other non-cash (income) expense, net           (2,394 )     469  
Write-down of assets held-for-sale     11,003              
                         
Change, net of acquisitions in:                        
Inventory     (2,531 )     (6,941 )     (3,641 )
Other assets     4,011       (5,053 )     (3,075 )
Interest receivable     (2,284 )     (4,002 )     (1,208 )
                         
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities     (11,572 )     17,217       95  
Taxes payable     10,233       3,778       (152 )
Interest payable     3,213       (250 )     398  
Other liabilities     7,067       (1,568 )     (1,212 )
Net cash used in operating activities   $ (67,678 )   $ (70,879 )   $ (35,536 )
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                        
Purchases of capital assets   $ (15,477 )   $ (47,085 )   $ (22,351 )
Investments in notes receivable     (14,809 )     (39,145 )     (15,483 )
Collection of notes receivable     254       3,164       4,519  
Cash paid for long-term investments     (35,067 )     (4,158 )     (2,201 )
Proceeds from business divestiture     997              
Proceeds from sale of investment                 9,634  
Proceeds from sale of capital assets     4,756       172        
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired     (9,983 )     (21,205 )     (32,147 )
Purchases of intangible assets           (58,488 )     (6,445 )
Deferred acquisition costs and deposits           2,076       (22,675 )
Distributions from investments     27       232       141  
Proceeds from (purchase of) short-term investments           149,828       (148,684 )
Net cash used in investing activities   $ (69,302 )   $ (14,609 )   $ (235,692 )
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                        
Proceeds from related party debt   $ 7,100     $ 15,000     $  
Repayment of related party loan     (22,100 )            
Proceeds from financing (refer to Note 14 for related party financing)     160,587       19,052        
Deferred financing costs paid     (7,864 )            
Proceeds from issuance of private placement units and warrants, net     31,117              
Collateral received from financing agreement     22,000              
Proceeds from issuance of membership units, net                 116,890  
Proceeds from issuance of subscription receipts, net                 298,644  
Settlement of taxes withheld           (10,306 )     (21,054 )
Purchase of non-controlling interest                 (19,643 )
Repayment of debt     (25,821 )     (12,333 )     (17,838 )
Capital contributions (distributions) - non-controlling interests, net           (4,363 )     2,767  
Net cash provided by financing activities   $ 165,019     $ 7,050     $ 359,766  
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash   $ 28,039     $ (78,438 )   $ 88,538  
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash - Beginning of period     26,600       105,038       16,500  
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash - End of period   $ 54,639     $ 26,600     $ 105,038  

 

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-6

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

    Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)   2020     2019     2018  
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:                  
Interest paid - non-lease   $ 5,617     $ 685     $ 1,381  
Income taxes paid     3,027       4,555       1,744  
OTHER NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                        
Capital assets not yet paid for   $ 2,479     $ 8,188     $ 393  
Exchange of intangible assets to notes receivable (Note 4)     18,800              
Holdback of Maine HSCP notes receivable (Note 6)     917              
Promissory note conversion (Note 6)     10,087              
Deferred tax liability related to business acquisition (Note 3)     3,077              
Beneficial conversion feature (Note 10)     523              
Convertible note conversion     550              
Unpaid debt issuance costs     3,000              
Exchange of investments for land and building (Note 5)     4,464              
Issuance of Class D units for land                 2,600  
Issuance of SVS for operating lease           3,353        

 

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-7

 

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS

 

Acreage Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”, “Pubco” or “Acreage”) was originally incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) on July 12, 1989 as Applied Inventions Management Inc. On August 29, 2014, the Company changed its name to Applied Inventions Management Corp. The Company continued into British Columbia and changed its name to “Acreage Holdings, Inc.” on November 9, 2018. The Company’s Class E subordinate voting shares (“Fixed Shares”) and Class D subordinate voting shares (“Floating Shares”) are listed on the Canadian Securities Exchange under the symbols “ACRG.A.U” and “ACRG.B.U”, respectively, quoted on the OTCQX under the symbols “ACRHF” and “ACRDF”, respectively, and traded on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbols “0VZ1” and “0VZ2”, respectively. The Company indirectly owns, operates and has contractual relationships with cannabis cultivation facilities, dispensaries and other cannabis-related companies in the United States (“U.S.”).

 

High Street Capital Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as “Acreage Holdings” (“HSCP”), was formed on April 29, 2014. The Company became the indirect parent of HSCP on November 14, 2018 in connection with the reverse takeover (“RTO”) transaction described below.

 

The Company’s principal place of business is located at 450 Lexington Avenue, #3308, New York, New York in the U.S. The Company’s registered and records office address is Suite 2800, Park Place, 666 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia in Canada.

 

The RTO transaction

 

On September 21, 2018, the Company, HSCP, HSCP Merger Corp. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company), Acreage Finco B.C. Ltd. (a special purpose corporation) (“Finco”), Acreage Holdings America, Inc. (“USCo”) and Acreage Holdings WC, Inc. (“USCo2”) entered into a business combination agreement (the “Business Combination Agreement”) whereby the parties thereto agreed to combine their respective businesses, which would result in the RTO of Pubco by the security holders of HSCP, which was deemed to be the accounting acquiror. On November 14, 2018, the parties to the Business Combination Agreement completed the RTO.

 

Canopy Growth Corporation transaction

 

On June 27, 2019, the Company and Canopy Growth Corporation (“Canopy Growth” or “CGC”) implemented the Prior Plan of Arrangement (as defined in Note 13) contemplated by the Original Arrangement Agreement (as defined in Note 13). Pursuant to the Prior Plan of Arrangement, Canopy Growth was granted an option to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company in exchange for the payment of 0.5818 of a common share in the capital of Canopy Growth for each Class A subordinate voting share (each, a “SVS”) held (with the Class B proportionate voting shares (the “PVS”) and Class C multiple voting shares (the “MVS”) being automatically converted to SVS immediately prior to consummation of the Acquisition (as defined in Note 13), which original exchange ratio was subject to adjustment in accordance with the Original Arrangement Agreement. Canopy Growth was required to exercise the option upon a change in federal laws in the United States to permit the general cultivation, distribution and possession of marijuana (as defined in the relevant legislation) or to remove the regulation of such activities from the federal laws of the United States (the “Triggering Event”) and, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions set out in the Original Arrangement Agreement, Canopy Growth was required to acquire all of the issued and outstanding SVS (following the mandatory conversion of the PVS and MVS into SVS).

 

On June 24, 2020, Canopy Growth and the Company entered into an agreement to, among other things, amend the terms of the Original Arrangement Agreement and the terms of the Prior Plan of Arrangement (the “Amended Arrangement”). On September 16, 2020, the Company’s shareholders voted in favor of a special resolution authorizing and approving the terms of, among other things, the Amended Arrangement. Subsequently, on September 18, 2020, the Company obtained a final order from the Supreme Court of British Columbia approving the Amended Arrangement, and on September 23, 2020 the Company and Canopy Growth entered into the Amending Agreement (as defined in Note 13) and implemented the Amended Arrangement. Pursuant to the Amended Arrangement, the Company’s articles were amended to create the Fixed Shares, the Floating Shares and the Class F multiple voting shares (the “Fixed Multiple Shares”), and each outstanding SVS was exchanged for 0.7 of a Fixed Share and 0.3 of a Floating Share, each outstanding PVS was exchanged for 28 Fixed Shares and 12 Floating Shares; and each outstanding MVS was exchanged for 0.7 of a Fixed Multiple Share and 0.3 of a Floating Share. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion.

 

Pursuant to the implementation of the Amended Agreement, on September 23, 2020, a subsidiary of Canopy Growth advanced gross proceeds of $50,000 to Universal Hemp, LLC, an affiliate of the Company. The debenture bears interest at a rate of 6.1% per annum. Refer to Note 10 for further discussion.

 

F-8

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

COVID-19

 

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) emerged in Wuhan, China. Since then, it has spread to other countries and infections have been reported around the world. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 a global pandemic.

 

In response to the outbreak, governmental authorities in the United States, Canada and internationally have introduced various recommendations and measures to try to limit the pandemic, including travel restrictions, border closures, non-essential business closures, quarantines, self-isolations, shelters-in-place and social distancing. The COVID-19 outbreak and the response of governmental authorities to try to limit it are having a significant impact on the private sector and individuals, including unprecedented business, employment and economic disruptions. Management has been closely monitoring the impact of COVID-19, with a focus in the health and safety of our employees, business continuity and supporting our communities. We have implemented various measures to reduce the spread of the virus, including implementing social distancing measures at our cultivation facilities, manufacturing facilities, and dispensaries, enhancing cleaning protocols at such facilities and dispensaries and encouraging employees to adhere to preventative measures recommended by local, state, and federal health officials.

 

2.            SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Basis of presentation and going concern

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which implies we will continue to meet our obligations for the next twelve months as of the date these financial statements are issued.

 

As reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2020, as well as a net loss and negative cash flow from operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the issuance of these financial statements.

 

However, management believes that substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to meet its obligations for the next twelve months from the date these financial statements were issued has been alleviated due to, but not limited to, (i) access to future capital commitments, (ii) continued sales growth from our consolidated operations, (iii) latitude as to the timing and amount of certain operating expenses as well as capital expenditures, (iv) restructuring plans that have already been put in place to improve the Company’s profitability, (v) the Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (refer to Note 13 and 17 for further discussion) and (vi) the anticipated Non-Core Divestitures (refer to Note 3 for further discussion).

 

If the Company is unable to raise additional capital whenever necessary, it may be forced to decelerate or curtail its footprint buildout or other operational activities until such time as additional capital becomes available. Such limitation of the Company’s activities would allow it to slow its rate of spending and extend its use of cash until additional capital is raised. However, management cannot provide any assurances that we will be successful in accomplishing any of our plans. Management also cannot provide any assurance as to unforeseen circumstances that could occur at any time within the next twelve months or thereafter which could increase our need to raise additional capital on an immediate basis.

 

Use of estimates

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates presented and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, assumptions relating to equity-based compensation expense, estimated useful lives for property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets and the assessment of potential impairment charges on goodwill, intangible assets and investments in equity and notes receivable.

 

F-9

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Emerging growth company

 

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”). Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies.

 

Functional and presentation currency

 

The consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes are expressed in U.S. dollars. Financial metrics are presented in thousands. Other metrics, such as shares outstanding, are presented in thousands unless otherwise noted.

 

Basis of consolidation

 

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Acreage, its subsidiaries and variable interest entities (“VIEs”) where we are considered the primary beneficiary, if any, after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions. Investments in business entities in which Acreage lacks control but is able to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for using the equity method. Our proportionate share of net income or loss of the entity is recorded in Income (loss) from investments, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

VIEs

 

In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, we assess whether we have the power to direct matters that most significantly impact the activities of the VIE and have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. There were no material consolidated VIEs as of December 31, 2020 or 2019.

 

Non-controlling interests (“NCI”)

 

Non-controlling interests represent ownership interests in consolidated subsidiaries by parties that are not shareholders of Pubco. They are shown as a component of Total equity in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, and the share of loss attributable to non-controlling interests is shown as a component of Net loss in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Changes in the parent company’s ownership that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions.

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

The Company defines cash equivalents as highly liquid investments held for the purpose of meeting short-term cash commitments that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash, with original maturities of three months or less. The Company maintains cash with various U.S. banks and credit unions with balances in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund limits, respectively. The failure of a bank or credit union where the Company has significant deposits could result in a loss of a portion of such cash balances in excess of the insured limit, which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and the market price of the Company’s Fixed Shares and Floating Shares.

 

F-10

 

 

Restricted cash

 

Restricted cash represents funds contractually held for specific purposes (refer to Note 10) and, as such, not available for general corporate purposes.

 

Cash and restricted cash, as presented on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, consists of $32,542 and $22,097 as of December 31, 2020, respectively, and $26,505 and $95 as of December 31, 2019, respectively.

 

Investments

 

The Company classifies its short-term investments in debt securities as held-to-maturity and accounts for them at amortized cost. Due to the short maturities, the carrying value approximates fair value. Refer to Note 5 for further discussion.

 

The Company accounts for long-term equity investments in which we are able to exercise significant influence, but do not have control over, using the equity method.

 

On January 1, 2018, we early adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-01 - Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”), which, among other provisions, requires the equity investments not accounted for using the equity method to be carried at fair value, with changes recognized in net income (“FV-NI”). For investments not accounted for using the equity method without a readily determinable fair value, a measurement alternative is available, allowing measurement at cost, less any impairment plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. There was no change to the Company’s accounting for investments, as it elected the measurement alternative for all former cost method investments. Refer to Note 5 for further discussion.

 

Inventory

 

The Company’s inventories include the direct costs of seeds and growing materials, indirect costs such as utilities, labor, depreciation and overhead costs, and subsequent costs to prepare the products for ultimate sale, which include direct costs such as materials and indirect costs such as utilities and labor. All direct and indirect costs related to inventory are capitalized when they are incurred, and they are subsequently classified to Cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Inventory is valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value, defined as estimated selling price in the ordinary cost of business, less costs of disposal. The Company measures inventory cost using specific identification for its retail inventory and the average cost method for its cultivation inventory.

 

Fair value of financial instruments

 

The Company accounts for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with ASC 820 - Fair Value Measurements. ASC 820 utilizes a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used to make the measurements. The hierarchy is summarized as follows:

 

1. Level 1 - quoted prices (unadjusted) that are in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

 

2. Level 2 - inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (prices) for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or indirectly (derived from prices) for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions

 

3. Level 3 - inputs for assets or liabilities that are not based upon observable market data

 

There were no material transfers in or out of Level 3 during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. The Company did not have any liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. The Company has Level 3 assets in equity-method investments and investments carried at FV-NI utilizing net asset value per share. Changes in fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are analyzed each reporting period based on changes in estimates or assumptions and recorded as appropriate.

 

F-11

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Notes receivable

 

The Company provides financing to various related and non-related businesses within the cannabis industry. These notes are classified as held for investment and are accounted for as financial instruments in accordance with ASC 310. The Company recognizes impairment on notes receivable when, based on all available information, it is probable that a loss has been incurred based on past events and conditions existing at the date of the financial statements. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized an impairment loss on a note receivable which was determined not collectible and recorded a loss on notes receivable in the amount of $8,161 in Loss on notes receivable on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. No impairment loss was recognized in the years ended December 31, 2019 or 2018.

 

Capital assets

 

Capital assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses, if any. Land and construction in process are not depreciated. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method for all other asset classes. The estimated useful life of buildings range from 10 to 40 years, and the estimated useful life of furniture, fixtures and equipment range from 3 to 10 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of their useful lives or the life of the lease. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. When capital assets are disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed and a gain or loss is included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

Leases

 

On January 1, 2019, the Company early adopted ASU 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842) using the modified retrospective approach. The Company elected the package of practical expedients contained in the new standard which, among other provisions, allows companies to retain existing lease classification under Topic 840 at transition. As such, there will be minimal impact on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company has also made an accounting policy election to not recognize right of use assets or lease liabilities for leases with an initial term of 12 months or less, and to continue recognizing the related expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Sale-leasebacks are assessed to determine whether a sale has occurred under ASC 606. If a sale is determined not to have occurred, the underlying “sold” assets are not derecognized and a financing liability is established in the amount of cash received. At such time that the lease expires, the assets are then derecognized along with the financing liability, with a gain recognized on disposal for the difference between the two amounts, if any.

 

On the date of adoption, the Company recognized right of use assets and lease liabilities on its Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, which reflect the present value of the Company's current minimum lease payments over the lease terms, which include options that are reasonably certain to be exercised, discounted using the Company’s estimated incremental borrowing rate. Refer to Note 8 for further discussion.

 

Intangible assets

 

Intangible assets such as management contracts are amortized over their estimated useful lives, while indefinite-lived intangibles such as cannabis licenses are not amortized.

 

Convertible debt

 

The Company assesses its financial instruments for embedded features that may require bifurcation from their host. If the embedded features do not meet the criteria for bifurcation, the convertible instrument is accounted for as a single hybrid instrument.

 

Business combinations

 

The Company’s growth strategy includes acquisition of retail, cultivation, processing and other cannabis related companies, the primary purpose of which is to continue to build a diversified portfolio of assets in the U.S. cannabis sector. These business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method on the date that control is transferred. The consideration transferred in the acquisition is measured at fair value, along with identifiable net assets acquired. Fixed Shares and Floating Shares issued are valued based on the closing price on the Canadian Securities Exchange. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets or liabilities of an acquired business and represents expected synergies associated with the acquisition such as the benefits of assembled workforces, expected earnings and future market development. These benefits were not recognized separately from goodwill because they do not meet the recognition criteria for identifiable intangible assets.

 

F-12

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Based on the Company’s tax status discussed below, goodwill is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. A bargain purchase gain is recognized when the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets or liabilities acquired is negative. The Company expenses transaction costs, other than those associated with the issue of debt or equity securities, in connection with a business combination as incurred. The Company measures non-controlling interests acquired, if any, at acquisition date fair value.

 

Impairment of long-lived assets

 

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not subject to amortization and are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that they might be impaired. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested at the individual business level. The Company may first assess qualitative factors and, if it determines it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying value, then proceed to a quantitative test if necessary.

 

Finite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets are tested for impairment based on undiscounted cash flows when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

 

F-13

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Income taxes

 

The Company will be treated as a U.S corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes under U.S. Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 7874 and be subject to U.S. federal income tax. However, for Canadian tax purposes, the Company is expected, regardless of any application of IRC Section 7874, to be treated as a Canadian resident company (as defined in the Income Tax Act (Canada)) for Canadian income tax purposes. As a result, the Company will be subject to taxation both in Canada and the U.S. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is management’s expectation that the Company’s activities will be conducted in such a manner that income from operations will not be subjected to double taxation.

 

HSCP operates in the U.S. as a limited liability company that is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal, state and local income tax purposes. As a result, HSCP’s income from its U.S. operations is not subject to U.S. federal income tax because the income is attributable to its members. Accordingly, the Company’s U.S. tax provision is based on the portion of HSCP’s income attributable to the Company and excludes the income attributable to other members of HSCP, whose income is included in Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, the Company also records a tax provision for the corporate entities owned directly by HSCP.

 

Income tax expense is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Current tax expense is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at year end, adjusted for amendments to tax payable with regards to previous years.

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities and the related deferred tax expense or recovery are recognized for deferred tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amount of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply when the asset is realized or the liability settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that substantive enactment occurs.

 

A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable income will be available against which the asset can be utilized.

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxing authority and the Company intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.

 

Certain Acreage subsidiaries are subject to IRC Section 280E. This section disallows deductions and credits attributable to a trade or business of trafficking in controlled substances. Under U.S. law, marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance.

 

F-14

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Revenue recognition

 

The Company early adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) on January 1, 2018. The new standard provides for a single model that applies to all contracts with customers with two types of recognition: at a point in time or over time. The Company has applied Topic 606 retrospectively for all periods presented and determined that there is no change to the comparative periods or transitional adjustments required as a result of adoption. The Company’s accounting policy for revenue recognition under Topic 606 is as follows:

 

1. Identify the contract with a customer;
2. Identify the performance obligation(s);
3. Determine the transaction price;
4. Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligation(s);
5. Recognize revenue when/as performance obligation(s) are satisfied.

 

Revenue from the direct sale of cannabis to customers for a fixed price is recognized when the Company transfers control of the good to the customer. The Company disaggregates its revenues from the direct sale of cannabis to customers on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as Retail revenue, net and Wholesale revenue, net.

 

Revenue from management contracts is recognized over time as the management services are provided. The Company provides management services to other cannabis companies for a fee structure that varies based on the contract. The services that may be provided are broadly defined and span the entire scope of the business. The Company evaluates the nature of its promise to the customer in these contracts and determines that its promise is to provide a management service. The service comprises various activities that may vary each day (such as support for cultivation, finance, accounting, human resources, retail, etc.). The Company disaggregates its management contract revenue on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as Other revenue, net.

 

Amounts disclosed as revenue are net of allowances, discounts and rebates.

 

Equity-settled payments

 

The Company issues equity-based awards to employees and non-employee directors for services. The Company measures these awards based on their fair value at the grant date and recognizes compensation expense over the requisite service period. The Company generally issues new shares to satisfy conversions, option and warrant exercises, and RSU vests. Forfeitures are accounted for as they occur.

 

Loss per share

 

Net loss per share represents the net loss attributable to shareholders divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period on an as converted basis. Basic and diluted loss per share are the same as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, as the issuance of shares upon conversion, exercise or vesting of outstanding units would be anti-dilutive in each period. There were 45,541, 41,526, and 38,061 anti-dilutive shares outstanding as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

 

Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted

 

As of December 2019, the Company early adopted ASU 2017-04 - Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”). The objective of ASU 2017-04 is to simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment. Under previous GAAP, entities were required to test goodwill for impairment using a two-step approach. Under the amendments in ASU 2017-04, an entity performs its goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. The adoption of ASU 2017-04 did not have an effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13 - Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”), which was subsequently revised by ASU 2018-19. The ASU introduces a new model for assessing impairment on most financial assets. Entities will be required to use a forward-looking expected loss model, which will replace the current incurred loss model, which will result in earlier recognition of allowance for losses. The ASU will be effective for the Company’s first interim period of fiscal 2023, and the Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard.

 

F-15

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

3. ACQUISITIONS, DIVESTITURES AND ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

 

Acquisitions

 

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company completed the following business combination. The preliminary purchase price allocation is as follows:

 

Purchase Price Allocation   CCF (1)  
Assets acquired:        
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 17  
Inventory     1,969  
Other current assets     3,164  
Capital assets, net     4,173  
Operating lease ROU asset     4,455  
Goodwill     5,247  
Intangible assets - cannabis licenses     10,000  
Other non-current assets     10  
Liabilities assumed:        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities     (228 )
Taxes payable     (17 )
Other current liabilities     (4,248 )
Operating lease liability     (4,455 )
Fair value of net assets acquired   $ 20,087  
         
Consideration paid:        
Cash   $ 10,000  
Settlement of pre-existing relationship     10,087  
Total consideration   $ 20,087  

 

The operating results of the above acquisition were not material to the periods presented.

 

(1) On June 26, 2020, a subsidiary of the Company acquired 100% of Compassionate Care Foundation, Inc. (“CCF”), a New Jersey vertically integrated medical cannabis nonprofit corporation.

 

The settlement of pre-existing relationship included in the transaction price includes a $7,952 line of credit as well as interest receivable of $2,135 which were both previously recorded in Notes receivable, non-current in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. The carrying value of these amounts approximated their fair value.

 

F-16

 

  

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

The Company completed the preliminary purchase price allocation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the assistance of an independent valuation firm. The Company is still in the process of completing the valuations. The preliminary purchase price allocation is based upon preliminary valuations and our estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the purchase price allocation period (generally one year from the acquisition date). The primary areas of the purchase price allocations that are not yet finalized relate to the valuation of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the residual goodwill.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company completed the following business combinations, and has allocated each purchase price as follows:

 

Purchase Price Allocation   Thames Valley
(1)
    NCC
(2)
    Form Factory (3)     Total  
Assets acquired:                                
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 106     $ 696     $ 4,276     $ 5,078  
Inventory     39       170       520       729  
Other current assets     1       36       1,136       1,173  
Capital assets, net           539       3,988       4,527  
Operating lease ROU asset                 10,477       10,477  
Goodwill     3,596       4,192       65,303       73,091  
Intangible assets - cannabis licenses     14,850       2,500       40,372       57,722  
Intangible assets - customer relationships                 4,600       4,600  
Intangible assets - developed technology                 3,100       3,100  
Other non-current assets           25       403       428  
Liabilities assumed:                                
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities     (121 )     (24 )     (1,572 )     (1,717 )
Other current liabilities           (621 )     (74 )     (695 )
Debt                 (494 )     (494 )
Operating lease liability                 (10,477 )     (10,477 )
Deferred tax liability     (3,399 )     (461 )     (14,519 )     (18,379 )
Other liabilities           (175 )     (23 )     (198 )
Fair value of net assets acquired   $ 15,072     $ 6,877     $ 107,016     $ 128,965  
                                 
Consideration paid:                                
Cash   $ 15,072     $     $ 3,711     $ 18,783  
Deferred acquisition costs and deposits           100             100  
Subordinate Voting Shares           3,948       95,266       99,214  
Settlement of pre-existing relationship           830       8,039       8,869  
Fair value of previously held interest           1,999             1,999  
Total consideration   $ 15,072     $ 6,877     $ 107,016     $ 128,965  
                                 
Subordinate Voting Shares issued           211       4,770       4,981  

 

The operating results of the above acquisitions were not material to the periods presented.

 

(1) On January 29, 2019, the Company acquired 100% of Thames Valley Apothecary, LLC (“Thames Valley”), a dispensary license holder in Connecticut.

 

(2) On March 4, 2019, the Company acquired the remaining 70% ownership interest in NCC LLC (“NCC”), a dispensary license holder in Illinois. The market price used in valuing SVS issued was $18.70 per share. As a result of this acquisition, the previously held interest in NCC was re-measured, resulting in a gain of $999, which was recorded in Income from investments, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

The settlement of pre-existing relationship included in the transaction price includes a $550 promissory note receivable as well as an amount receivable of $280 which was previously recorded in Other current assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. The carrying value of these amounts approximated their fair value.

 

F-17

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

(3) On April 16, 2019, the Company acquired 100% of Form Factory Holdings, LLC (“Form Factory”), a manufacturer and distributor of cannabis-based edibles and beverages. The Company expects to benefit primarily from utilizing the intangible assets acquired, which include cannabis licenses in California and Oregon, existing customer relationships, and developed technology, which will complement Acreage’s existing business and enable the Company to create and distribute proprietary brands of various types at scale. The useful life of the developed technology was determined to be 19 years, and the useful life of the customer relationships was determined to be 5 years.

 

The market price used in valuing unrestricted SVS issued was $20.45 per share. Certain SVS are subject to clawback should certain indemnity conditions arise and as such, a discount for lack of marketability was applied that correlates to the period of time these shares are subject to restriction.

 

The Company also recorded an expense of $2,139 in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 in connection with the acquisition of Form Factory that represents stock compensation fully vested on the acquisition date. 86 shares valued at $1,753 were issued and recorded in Other equity transactions on the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, with the remainder settled in cash.

 

The settlement of pre-existing relationship included in the transaction price included a $7,924 promissory note receivable and $115 of interest receivable. The carrying value of these amounts approximated their fair value.

 

Deferred acquisition costs and deposits

 

The Company’s subsidiaries make advance payments to certain acquisition targets for which the transfer is pending certain regulatory approvals prior to the acquisition date.

 

As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company’s subsidiaries had no deferred acquisition costs outstanding.

 

Divestitures

 

On May 8, 2020, a subsidiary of the Company sold all equity interests in Acreage North Dakota, LLC, a medical cannabis dispensary holder and operator, for $1,000. This resulted in a gain on sale of $217 recorded in Other loss, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

Assets Held for Sale

 

On June 30, 2020, the Company determined certain businesses and assets met the held-for-sale criteria. The Company has identified the following businesses as their separate disposal groups: Acreage Florida, Inc., Kanna, Inc., Maryland Medicinal Research & Caring, LLC (“MMRC”) and certain Oregon entities comprising 22nd & Burn, Inc., The Firestation 23, Inc. and East 11th Incorporated and a dispensary in Springfield, Oregon, collectively (“Cannabliss”). As further disposal groups, the Company has identified certain assets owned in HSCP Oregon, LLC (comprising Medford and Powell) and Michigan as held-for-sale.

 

In accordance to ASC 205-20-45 - Discontinued Operations, a disposal of a component of an entity shall be reported in discontinued operations if the divestiture represents a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the entity’s operations and financial results. Management determined that the expected divestitures will not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results and thus will not report the expected divestitures of these assets as discontinued operations.

 

Upon classification of the disposal groups as held for sale, the Company tested each disposal group for impairment and recognized charges of $11,003 within Write down of assets held-for-sale on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2020 to write the disposal groups down to its fair value less costs to sell. Additionally, all assets and liabilities determined within these disposal groups were transferred into Assets held-for-sale and Liabilities related to assets held for sale on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, 2020 from each of their previous respective financial statement captions. Refer to table below for further details.

 

The preliminary fair values of the major classes of assets and liabilities of the businesses and assets classified as held-for-sale on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position are presented below and are subject to change based on developments during the sales process.

 

F-18

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

    December 31, 2020
    Acreage Florida, Inc.   Kanna, Inc.   MMRC(1)   Michigan   OR - Cannabliss   OR - Medford   OR - Powell   Total
Inventory   $ 587      $ —      $ —      $ —      $ 379      $ 100      $ 127      $ 1,193   
Notes receivable, current   —      —      —      —      —      31      —      31   
Other current assets   161      —      20      —          —      —      182   
Total current assets classified as held-for-sale   748      —      20      —      380      131      127      1,406   
Capital assets, net   7,137      1,156      286      7,469      83      2,252          18,390   
Operating lease right-of-use assets   10,305      944      362      —      925      321      164      13,021   
Intangible assets, net   26,190      970      802      —      —      —      —      27,962   
Goodwill   —      —      —      —      2,192      —      —      2,192   
Total assets classified as held for sale   $ 44,380      $ 3,070      $ 1,470      $ 7,469      $ 3,580      $ 2,704      $ 298      $ 62,971   
                                 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   $ (247)     $ (132)     $ (3)     $ —      $ (260)     $ —      $ —      $ (642)  
Taxes payable   —          —      —      (179)     —      —      (178)  
Operating lease liability, current   (501)     (250)     (29)     —      (184)     (133)     (122)     (1,219)  
Other current liabilities   (89)     —      —      —      —      —      —      (89)  
Total current liabilities classified as held-for-sale   (837)     (381)     (32)     —      (623)     (133)     (122)     (2,128)  
Operating lease liability, non-current   (14,107)     (610)     (325)     —      (688)     (278)     (22)     (16,030)  
Deferred tax liabilities   —      —      —      —          —      —       
Total liabilities classified as held-for-sale   $ (14,944)     $ (991)     $ (357)     $ —      $ (1,307)     $ (411)     $ (144)     $ (18,154)  

 

(1) On August 11, 2020, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a transaction of sale for MMRC for $1,500 with a buyer. The Company’s applicable subsidiary, when permitted by state law, will transfer all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of MMRC to the buyer. In the interim, and subject to regulatory approval, the buyer and MMRC will enter into a management services agreement for the management and operation of MMRC until such time as the Company can transfer the equity of MMRC to the buyer.

 

F-19

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

4.            INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

 

Intangible assets

 

The following table details our intangible asset balances by major asset classes:

 

Intangibles   December 31,
2020
  December 31,
2019
Finite-lived intangible assets:        
Management contracts   $ 19,580      $ 52,438   
Customer relationships   —      4,600   
Developed technology   —      3,100   
    19,580      60,138   
Accumulated amortization on finite-lived intangible assets:        
Management contracts   (5,262)     (5,750)  
Customer relationships   —      (649)  
Developed technology   —      (114)  
    (5,262)     (6,513)  
Finite-lived intangible assets, net   14,318      53,625   
         
Indefinite-lived intangible assets        
Cannabis licenses   124,665      232,347   
         
Total intangibles, net   $ 138,983      $ 285,972   

 

The intangible assets balance as of December 31, 2020 excludes intangible assets reclassified to assets held for sale. Refer to Note 3 for further discussion. The average useful life of finite-lived intangible assets ranges from five to eight years.

 

Impairment of intangible assets

 

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus emerged in Wuhan, China, which since then, has spread worldwide. As a result of the recent global economic impact and uncertainty due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company concluded a triggering event had occurred and accordingly, performed interim impairment testing for the period ending March 31, 2020.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company performed a quantitative analysis and concluded certain of the indefinite-lived cannabis licenses had a fair value below the carrying value. Accordingly, during the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company recognized impairment charges of $92,798 and $9,514, respectively, with respect to its indefinite-lived intangible assets at Acreage Florida, Inc., Form Factory Holdings, LLC and Kanna, Inc. The charge is recognized in Loss on impairment on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

The Company evaluated the recoverability of the related finite-lived intangible assets to be held and used by comparing the carrying amount of the assets to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the assets, or comparable market sales data to determine if the carrying value is recoverable. During the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company recognized impairment charges of $8,324 and $3,949, respectively, with respect to its finite-lived intangible assets at Form Factory, CWG Botanicals, Inc. (“CWG”) and MA-SSBP. The charge is recognized in Loss on impairment on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

These impairments resulted in the recognition of a tax provision benefit and an associated reversal of deferred tax liabilities of $31,498 during the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

F-20

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

WCM Refinancing

 

On March 6, 2020, a subsidiary of the Company closed on a refinancing, transaction and conversion related to Northeast Patients Group, operating as Wellness Connection of Maine (“WCM”), a medical cannabis business in Maine, resulting in ownership of WCM by three individuals. In connection with the transaction, WCM converted from a non-profit corporation to a for-profit corporation. Refer to Note 6 for further discussion. Concurrently, a portion of the management contract was converted into a promissory note of $18,800 in Notes receivable, non-current on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position in exchange for the previously held management contract. An impairment was determined as the differential between the net carrying value of the previously held management contract and the promissory note received in exchange. This resulted in an impairment loss to finite-lived intangible assets of $9,395 in Loss on impairment on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

Modification of management contract

 

On October 7, 2019, the Company modified the terms of its Management Service Agreement (“MSA”) with Greenleaf Apothecaries, LLC (“GLA”). As a result of this modification, the Company exchanged certain future cash flows under the MSA in exchange for a note receivable of $12,500. In connection with this modification, the Company reduced the carrying value of the MSA by $10,106, recorded a gain of $2,394 and reduced the associated deferred tax liability by $2,730, with a corresponding increase to Other equity transactions in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity.

 

Purchases of intangible assets

 

The Company determined that the below purchases of intangible assets did not qualify as business combinations as the entities were non-operational at the time of purchase.

 

2019

 

On January 4, 2019, the Company purchased a vertically-integrated license in Florida to operate a cultivation and processing facility and up to 40 medical cannabis dispensaries by acquiring Acreage Florida, Inc. (formerly known as Nature’s Way Nursery of Miami, Inc.). Total consideration of $70,103 included: (i) $53,747 in cash, (ii) $12,000 of previously-paid deferred acquisition costs and (iii) $4,356 in HSCP units (198 units). The HSCP units issued were valued based on the market price of SVS (for which HSCP units are convertible) at the transaction date, which was $22.00 per share. In addition to the intangible asset purchased, the Company also acquired $361 of equipment, recorded in Capital assets, net and a $190 surety bond, recorded in Other non-current assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. A deferred tax liability of $16,049 was also recorded in connection with this purchase.

 

On July 2, 2019, the Company acquired Kanna, Inc. (“Kanna”), a dispensary license holder in Oakland, California, for total consideration of $7,525 which included: (i) $1,991 in cash and (ii) $5,534 in Subordinate Voting Shares (383 shares). A deferred tax liability of $2,316 was also recorded in connection with this purchase. The SVS issued were valued based on the market price at the transaction date, which was $15.81 per share. Certain SVS are subject to clawback should certain indemnity conditions arise and as such, a discount for lack of marketability was applied that correlates to the period of time these shares are subject to restriction.

 

Amortization expense recorded during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $2,789, $5,276 and $3,128, respectively.

 

Expected annual amortization expense for existing intangible assets subject to amortization at December 31, 2020 is as follows for each of the next five fiscal years:

 

Amortization of Intangibles   2021   2022   2023   2024   2025
Amortization expense   $ 2,164      $ 2,164      $ 2,164      $ 2,164      $ 2,164   

 

Goodwill

 

The following table details the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill:

 

Goodwill   Total
December 31, 2018   $ 32,116   
Acquisitions   73,091   
Adjustment to purchase price allocation   550   
December 31, 2019   $ 105,757   
Acquisitions   5,247   
Impairment   (76,890)  
Transferred to held-for-sale   (2,192)  
December 31, 2020   $ 31,922   

 

Also as a result of the recent global economic impact and uncertainty due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company concluded a triggering event had occurred and accordingly, performed interim impairment testing for the period ending March 31, 2020.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company recognized impairment charges of $65,304 and nil, respectively, with respect to its goodwill related to Form Factory. The Company applied the discounted cash flow approach to determine the fair value of Form Factory. The charge is recognized in Loss on impairment on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

Pursuant to the WCM refinancing described above, the Company recognized an impairment loss to goodwill of $11,586 on Loss of impairment on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2020. This was determined as the differential between the net carrying value of the previously held management contract and the promissory note received in exchange.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company made final adjustments to the purchase price allocation with respect to certain acquisitions made during the year ended December 31, 2018 within the one-year measurement period.

 

5. INVESTMENTS

 

The carrying values of the Company’s investments in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:

 

Investments   December 31, 2020   December 31, 2019
Investments held at FV-NI   34,126      4,376   
Equity method investments   —      123   
Total long-term investments   $ 34,126      $ 4,499   

 

F-21

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Income from investments, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 is as follows:

 

  Year Ended December 31,
Investment income   2020   2019   2018
Short-term investments   $ —      $ 738      $ 406   
Investments held at FV-NI   1,158      (2,218)     6,570   
Equity method investments   (1,060)     1,000      13,301   
Gain from investments held for sale   —      —      1,500   
Income from investments, net   $ 98      $ (480)     $ 21,777   

 

Income from investments without readily determinable fair value for the year ended December 31, 2018 primarily resulted from the remeasurement of previously held investments at the time of acquisition, in which the Company previously had an investment carried at cost (prior to January 1, 2018) or for which the measurement alternative was elected (January 1, 2018 and beyond), as further discussed in Note 3.

 

Income from equity method investments for the year ended December 31, 2018 was primarily driven by the remeasurement of previously held investments at the time of acquisition, as further discussed in Note 3.

 

Short-term investments

 

The Company from time to time invests in U.S. Treasury bills which are classified as held-to-maturity and measured at amortized cost. These range in original maturity from three to six months, and bear interest ranging from 2.2% - 2.4%. During the year ended December 31, 2019, short-term investments in U.S. Treasury bills in the amount of $149,828 matured.

 

Investments in equity without readily determinable fair value (formerly cost method investments)

 

The Company adopted ASU 2016-01 on January 1, 2018. Prior to adoption, investments in equity securities that did not give the Company significant influence over the investee were classified as cost method investments and held at their initial cost, assessed periodically for impairment. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-01, the Company elected to use the available measurement alternative for investments without readily determinable fair values (which are classified as Level 3 investments in the fair value hierarchy). The measurement alternative requires the investments to be held at cost and adjusted for impairment and observable price changes, if any.

 

In October 2018, the Company resigned as a manager of Florida Wellness, LLC (“FLW”), an entity in which the Company owned 44% and consolidated due to control as manager. FLW in turn owned 15% of San Felasco Nurseries, LLC (“SFN”), which the Company classified as an investment carried at cost (prior to January 1, 2018) and for which the measurement alternative was elected (January 1, 2018 and beyond). In connection with its resignation, the Company exchanged its share of the investment in SFN for a note receivable of $2,028. The Company also issued warrants to FLW and recognized expense of $1,423 during the year ended December 31, 2018, recorded in Income from investments, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The remaining $4,775 interest in FLW as well as the NCI’s portion of a note receivable of $880 was eliminated through de-consolidation of the non-controlling interest in Other equity transactions in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity.

 

Investments held at FV-NI

 

The Company has investments in equity of several companies that do not result in significant influence or control. These investments are carried at fair value, with gains and losses recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

In November 2020, the Company completed an exchange of all its equity interests in GreenAcreage Real Estate and its equity method investment in the management company of GreenAcreage in exchange for land and building previously accounted for as a failed sales-leaseback transaction (refer to Notes 7 and 14 for further discussion).

 

Equity method investments

 

The Company accounts for investments in which it can exert significant influence but does not control as equity method investments in accordance with ASC 810.

 

With a portion of the proceeds for the 6.1% loan received by Universal Hemp, LLC (“Universal Hemp”), Acreage engaged an investment advisor (the “Investment Advisor”) which, under the Investment Advisor’s sole discretion, invested on behalf of Universal Hemp $34,019 on September 28, 2020. As a result, Universal Hemp acquired 34,019 class B units, at $1 par value per unit, which represented 100% financial interest in an Investment Partnership, a Canada-based limited partnership. An affiliate of the Institutional Investor holds Class A units of the Investment Partnership. The general partner of the Investment Partnership is also an affiliate of the Institutional Investor. The Class B units are held by the Investment Advisor as an agent for Universal Hemp. Universal Hemp, through its investment with the Investment Advisor was determined to hold significant influence in the Investment Partnership in accordance with ASC 810 due to 1) the economic financial interest, and 2) the entitlement to matters as they pertain to ‘Extraordinary Resolution’ items as defined within the Investment Partnership Agreement. As a result, the Company accounted for the investment in the Investment Partnership under the equity method until December 2020. See Note 10 (“September 2020 Transactions”).

 

In December 2020, as the Company no longer held significant influence due to the removal of the Extraordinary Resolution entitlements and other revisions in the Investment Partnership Agreement, the Company changed its accounting for the Investment Partnership to recognize the investment at fair value, with gains and losses recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s equity method investments were not deemed significant to the Company’s financial statements and as such, additional disclosure is omitted. The Company purchased the remaining interests in the majority of its equity method investments during the year ended December 31, 2018. Refer to Notes 3 and 4 for further discussion.

 

Investments held for sale

 

In the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company initiated a plan to sell its equity interest in Compass Ventures, Inc., Greenhouse Compass, LLC, HSGH Properties, LLC and HSGH Properties Union, LLC (together, “Compass Ventures”). During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company sold its investment in Compass Ventures for cash proceeds of $9,634, recognizing a $1,500 net gain on the sale.

 

6.            NOTES RECEIVABLE

 

Notes receivable as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 consisted of the following:

 

    December 31,
2020
  December 31,
2019
Notes receivable   $ 94,171      $ 75,851   
Interest receivable   5,762      5,774   
Total notes receivable   $ 99,933      $ 81,625   
Less: Notes receivable, current   2,032      2,146   
Notes receivable, non-current   $ 97,901      $ 79,479   

 

Interest income on notes receivable during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 totaled $6,695, $3,978 and $1,178, respectively.

 

Activity during the year ended December 31, 2020

 

On March 6, 2020, a subsidiary of the Company closed on a refinancing transaction and conversion related to Northeast Patients Group, operating as WCM, a medical cannabis business in Maine, resulting in ownership of WCM by three individuals. In connection with the transaction, WCM converted from a non-profit corporation to a for-profit corporation. WCM previously had a series of agreements with Wellness Pain & Management Connection LLC (“WPMC”), which resulted in an outstanding balance of $18,800 due to WPMC as of closing of this transaction. A restated consulting agreement was put in place, whereby WCM agrees to pay a fixed annual fee of $120, payable monthly, in exchange for a suite of consulting services. In addition, a promissory note payable to WPMC was signed in the amount of $18,800 to convert the existing payment due into a fixed, secured debt obligation.

 

F-22

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

In order to fund the transaction of WCM, a subsidiary of the Company created a new Maine corporation, named Maine HSCP, Inc. (“Maine HSCP”). At closing, a subsidiary of the Company contributed $5,700 to Maine HSCP, and then sold 900 shares of Maine HSCP, constituting all of the outstanding equity interests of Maine HSCP, to three qualifying individuals in exchange for promissory notes of $1,900 each. Each note is secured by a pledge of the shares in Maine HSCP, and payment of the note is to be made solely from dividends paid to the shareholder by Maine HSCP, except for amounts to be paid to the shareholder to cover tax obligations. As of December 31, 2020, the Company recorded a holdback reserve of $917 for the State of Maine as a result of finalization of valuation by the State. The Company’s relevant subsidiary has the option, exercisable at any time, to buy back the shares, at the higher of fair market value or the remaining balance under the promissory notes. The individuals also have the right at any time to put the shares to the Company’s subsidiary on the same terms. The net equity impact to the Company was nil, and the option described above is only redeemable if permissible pursuant to Maine regulations.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company wrote off the convertible note receivable and the accrued interest of $8,000 and $161, respectively, as the Company determined that the note was not collectible and recorded a loss on notes receivable of $8,161.

 

Activity during the year ended December 31, 2019

 

On July 1, 2019, the Company entered into a $8,000 convertible note receivable with a west coast social equity program. Upon certain conditions related to a subsequent capital raise, the Company will obtain the right to convert its financing receivable to an ownership interest. The line of credit matures in June 2022 and bears interest at a rate of 8% per annum.

 

On October 7, 2019, the Company recorded a note receivable of $12,500 in connection with the MSA modification described in Note 4. The note is payable monthly and bears interest at a rate of prime plus 10% for the unpaid portion of any monthly payments.

 

The Company provides revolving lines of credit to several entities under management services agreements which are included in notes receivable. The relevant terms and balances are detailed below.

 

Lines of Credit           Balance as of
Counterparty   Maximum Obligation   Interest Rate   December 31,
2020
  December 31,
2019
Greenleaf (1)   $ 31,200      3.25% - 4.75%   $ 29,422      $ 22,569   
CWG Botanicals, Inc. ("CWG") (2)   12,000      8%   9,767      9,152   
Compassionate Care Foundation, Inc. (“CCF”) (3)   12,500      18%   —      7,152   
Prime Alternative Treatment Center, Inc. ("PATC") (4)   4,650      15%   4,650      4,650   
Patient Centric of Martha’s Vineyard, Ltd. (“PCMV”) (5)   9,000      15%   6,873      5,758   
Health Circle, Inc. (6)   8,000      15%   4,331      3,988   
Total   $ 77,350          $ 55,043      $ 53,269   

 

(1) During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company extended lines of credit to Greenleaf Apothecaries, LLC, Greenleaf Therapeutics, LLC and Greenleaf Gardens, LLC (together “Greenleaf”), which mature in June 2023.

 

(2) The revolving line of credit due from CWG, the license holder managed by NorCal, matures in December 2021.

 

(3) In September 2018, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a management agreement to provide certain advisory and consulting services to CCF for a monthly fee based on product sales.

 

On November 15, 2019, certain changes in New Jersey state laws occurred to allow for-profit entities to hold cannabis licenses and certain regulatory approvals. Accordingly, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a Reorganization Agreement with CCF, whereby the management agreement will terminate and any outstanding obligations on the line of credit will convert to a direct ownership interest in CCF, which will convert to a for-profit entity. On June 26, 2020, the transactions contemplated by the Reorganization Agreement closed and the line of credit converted into equity in CCF’s successor entity. Please see Note 3 for additional details.

 

(4) PATC is a non-profit license holder in New Hampshire to which the Company’s consolidated subsidiary PATCC provides management or other consulting services. The line of credit matures in August 2022.

 

(5) In November 2018, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a services agreement with PCMV. The line of credit matures in November 2023. The services agreement was terminated in February 2020.

 

(6) Health Circle, Inc. is a non-profit license holder in Massachusetts that formerly had a services agreement with the Company’s consolidated subsidiary MA RMDS SVCS, LCC. The line of credit matures in November 2032. The services agreement was terminated in February 2020.

 

F-23

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

7. CAPITAL ASSETS, net

 

Net property and equipment consisted of:

 

    December 31,
2020
  December 31,
2019
Land (1)   $ 3,811      $ 9,839   
Building   34,114      34,522   
Right-of-use asset, finance leases   5,077      5,954   
Construction in progress   13,697      17,288   
Furniture, fixtures and equipment   18,062      21,019   
Leasehold improvements   23,681      22,682   
Capital assets, gross   $ 98,442      $ 111,304   
Less: accumulated depreciation   (9,306)     (5,257)  
Capital assets, net   $ 89,136      $ 106,047   

 

Depreciation of capital assets for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 includes $3,381, $2,317, and $621 of depreciation expense, and $2,479, $1,556, and $724 that was capitalized to inventory, respectively.

 

(1) During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company sold parcels of land for an aggregate sale price of $2,166. In connection with these transactions, the Company recorded a loss on sale of $981 in Other loss, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

Sale-leasebacks

 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company sold and subsequently leased back several of its capital assets in a transaction with GreenAcreage Real Estate Corp. (“GreenAcreage”), a related party (refer to Note 14 for further discussion). The Company sold assets and subsequently leased them back for total proceeds of $19,052. The subsequent leases met the criteria for finance leases, and as such, the transactions do not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment. The “sold” assets remain within land, building and leasehold improvements, as appropriate, for the duration of the lease and a financing liability equal to the amount of proceeds received is recorded within debt (see Note 10). Upon lease termination, the sale will be recognized by removing the remaining carrying values of the capital assets and financing liability, with any difference recognized as a gain.

 

In November 2020, the Company completed an exchange of all its equity interests in GreenAcreage Real Estate and its equity method investment in the management company of GreenAcreage in exchange for land and building previously accounted for as a failed sales-leaseback transaction and recognized a gain of $1,473 in Other loss, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

8.       LEASES

 

The Company leases land, buildings, equipment and other capital assets which it plans to use for corporate purposes and the production and sale of cannabis products. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and are expensed in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on the straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company does not have any material variable lease payments, and accounts for non-lease components separately from leases.

 

Balance Sheet Information   Classification   December 31, 2020   December 31, 2019
Right-of-use assets            
Operating   Operating lease right-of-use assets   $ 17,247      $ 51,950   
Finance   Capital assets, net   4,776      5,832   
Total right-of-use assets       $ 22,023      $ 57,782   
             
Lease liabilities            
Current            
Operating   Operating lease liability, current   $ 1,492      $ 2,759   
Financing   Debt, current   —      49   
Non-current            
Operating   Operating lease liability, non-current   16,609      47,522   
Financing   Debt, non-current   5,174      6,083   
Total lease liabilities       $ 23,275      $ 56,413   
             
Statement of Operations Information   Classification   Year Ended
December 31, 2020
 

Year Ended
December 31, 2019

Short-term lease expense   General and administrative   $ 1,258      $ 1,262   
Operating lease expense   General and administrative   6,252      5,351   
Finance lease expense:            
Amortization of right of use asset   Depreciation and amortization   161      122   
Interest expense on lease liabilities   Interest expense   820      290   
Sublease income   Other loss, net   (37)     (110)  
Net lease cost       $ 7,196      $ 5,653   
             
Statement of Cash Flows Information   Classification  

Year Ended
December 31, 2020

 

Year Ended
December 31, 2019

Cash paid for operating leases   Net cash used in operating activities   $ 6,130      $ 3,667   
Cash paid for finance leases - interest   Net cash used in operating activities   $ 1,316      $ 223   

 

The Company’s rent expense during the year ended December 31, 2018 was $1,604.

 

The following represents the Company’s future minimum payments required under existing leases with initial terms of one year or more as of December 31, 2020:

 

F-24

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Maturity of lease liabilities   Operating Leases     Finance Leases  
2021 (1)   $ 4,733     $ 680  
2022     3,254       701  
2023     2,954       722  
2024     2,916       743  
2025     2,965       766  
Thereafter     14,113       13,275  
Total lease payments   $ 30,935     $ 16,887  
Less: interest     11,852       11,713  
Present value of lease liabilities   $ 19,083     $ 5,174  
                 
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)     8       14  
Weighted average discount rate     11 %     15 %

 

(1) Includes minimum payments under existing operating leases currently classified as held-for-sale (refer to Note 3 for further discussion).

 

As of December 31, 2020, there have been no leases entered into that have not yet commenced.

 

9. INVENTORY

 

    December 31, 2020   December 31, 2019
Retail inventory   $ 1,803      $ 1,784   
Wholesale inventory   18,055      11,993   
Cultivation inventory   2,317      3,021   
Supplies & other   1,540      1,285   
Total   $ 23,715      $ 18,083   

 

F-25

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

10. DEBT

 

The Company’s debt balances consist of the following:

 

Debt balances   December 31, 2020     December 31, 2019  
NCCRE loan   $ 470     $ 492  
Seller’s notes     2,581       2,810  
Related party debt           15,000  
Financing liability (related party)     15,253       19,052  
Finance lease liabilities     5,174       6,132  
3.55% Credit facility due 2022     20,043        
3.55% Credit facility collateral (related party)     22,169        
Convertible debenture            
Bridge loan            
7.5% Loan due 2023 (related party)     32,124        
6.1% Secured debenture due 2030 (related party)     46,085        
Hempco Foros promissory note     2,000        
Senior secured term loan facility     22,870        
Construction financing loan     4,438        
Canwell settlement promissory note     7,250        
Total debt   $ 180,457     $ 43,486  
Less: current portion of debt     27,139       15,300  
Total long-term debt   $ 153,318     $ 28,186  

 

The interest expense related to the Company’s debt during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 consists of the following:

 

    Year Ended December 31,  
Interest expense   2020     2019     2018  
Convertible notes:                        
Cash interest   $     $     $ 869  
PIK interest                 1,912  
Accretion                 926  
Convertible note interest   $     $     $ 3,707  
NCCRE loan     18       19       22  
Seller’s notes     297       416       888  
Related party debt     18              
Interest expense on financing liability (related party)     1,700       469        
Interest expense on finance lease liabilities     820       290        
3.55% Credit facility due 2022     1,257              
3.55% Credit facility collateral (related party)     2,212              
Convertible debenture     2,872              
Bridge loan     3,993              
7.5% Loan due 2023 (related party)     727              
6.1% Secured debenture due 2030 (related party)     940              
Hempco Foros promissory note     43              
Senior secured term loan facility     956              
Total interest expense   $ 15,853     $ 1,194     $ 4,617  

 

Convertible notes

 

The Company issued senior secured convertible notes in November 2017 for a total principal amount of $31,294, net of issuance costs. The debt contained a conversion feature and attached warrants, neither of which met the criteria for bifurcation. In connection with the RTO on November 14, 2018, the notes and PIK interest mandatorily converted to 6,473 Class A membership units, and the Company issued 1,878 warrants to purchase Pubco shares at $25 per share, which expire on November 14, 2021. The carrying value of the debt, including unamortized discount, was credited to Share capital in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and no gain or loss was recognized.

 

NCC Real Estate, LLC (“NCCRE”) loan

 

NCCRE, which is owned by the Company’s consolidated subsidiary HSC Solutions, LLC, entered into a $550 secured loan with a financial institution for the purchase of a building in Rolling Meadows, Illinois in December 2016. The building is leased to NCC. The promissory note payable carries a fixed interest rate of 3.7% and is due in December 2021.

 

Seller’s notes

 

The Company issued Seller’s notes payable in connection with several transactions, bearing interest at rates ranging from 3.5% to 10%.

 

F-26

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Related party debt

 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, Kevin Murphy, the Chairman of the board of directors, made a non-interest bearing loan of $15,000 to Acreage. In January 2020, Mr. Murphy made an additional non-interest bearing loan of $5,000 to Acreage. These amounts were subsequently repaid in March 2020.

 

In October 2020, Mr. Murphy made an interest bearing loan of $2,100 to the Company, bearing interest at 9.9% per annum. This amount was subsequently repaid in November 2020.

 

In addition, Mr. Murphy has an interest in the credit facility disclosed below under “3.55% Credit facility and collateral”, in connection with which he loaned $21,000 of the $22,000 borrowed by the Company to the Lender (as defined below), which amount remains outstanding.

 

Financing liability (related party)

 

In connection with the Company’s failed sale-leaseback transaction (refer to Note 7), a financing liability was recognized equal to the cash proceeds received. The Company will recognize the cash payments made on the lease as interest expense, and the principal will be derecognized upon expiration of the lease.

 

3.55% Credit facility and collateral

 

On March 11, 2020, the Company borrowed $21,000 from an institutional lender pursuant to a credit facility. The credit facility permits the Company to borrow up to $100,000, which may be drawn down by the Company in four tranches, maturing two years from the date of the first draw down. The Company will pay an annual interest rate of 3.55% on the first advance of debt for a term of two years. The borrowed amounts under the credit facility are fully collateralized by $22,000 of restricted cash, which was borrowed pursuant to the loan transaction described below. Any additional draws must be fully cash collateralized as well.

 

Also on March 11, 2020, the Company closed $22,000 in borrowings pursuant to a loan transaction with IP Investment Company, LLC (the “Lender”). The maturity date is 366 days from the closing date of the loan transaction. The Company will pay monthly interest on the collateral in the form of 27 SVS through the maturity date. The Lender may put any unsold interest shares to the Company upon maturity at a price of $4.50 per share. Kevin Murphy, the Chairman of the board of directors, loaned $21,000 of the $22,000 borrowed by the Company to the Lender. The loan is secured by the non-U.S. intellectual property assets, a cannabis state license and 12,000 SVS shares of the Company.

 

Pursuant to the Amended Arrangement, the monthly interest on the collateral payable to Kevin Murphy was modified to cash payments for the remaining duration of the term at an interest rate of 12% per annum, payable upon maturity. The remaining interest will continue to be paid monthly in the form of 2 Fixed Shares and 1 Floating Share through the maturity date.

 

The Company has determined such equity interest on collateral to be a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument that is recorded as a liability in accordance with ASC 480 - Distinguishing liabilities from equity (“ASC 480”). The liability is calculated based upon the share interest multiplied by the maturity price of $4.50 per share. The equity and cash liability amounted to $88 and $81, respectively as of December 31, 2020 and was recorded in Debt, current within the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

 

Convertible debenture

 

On May 29, 2020, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with an Investment Fund (the “Investor”), pursuant to which the Company sold and issued $11,000 in principal amount under a secured convertible debenture, with gross proceeds to the Company of $10,000 before transaction fees (the “Convertible Debenture”).

 

The Convertible Debenture bears interest at 15% per annum and was secured by the Company’s medical cannabis dispensaries in Connecticut. The Convertible Debenture was convertible by the holder in whole or in part after September 30, 2020. Prior to September 30, 2020, the holder could convert only up to $550 of principal amount. The Convertible Debenture may not be converted to common stock to the extent such conversion would result in the holder beneficially owning more than 4.99% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The Convertible Debenture was convertible into Class A Subordinate Voting Shares of the Company at a conversion price of $1.68 per share, subject to the conversion limitations described above. On September 4, 2020, the holder accordingly converted $550 of the principal amount.

 

The maturity date is the earlier of (i) May 29, 2021 or (ii) on the consummation of one or more debt, equity or a combination of debt and equity financing transactions in which the Company receives gross proceeds of $40,000 or more. The Company accreted all discounts to Interest expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

F-27

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

The Company recorded beneficial conversion of $523, representing 5% of the principal amount which was convertible in Share Capital in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, and an equivalent discount was recorded against the carrying value of the Convertible Debenture. The beneficial conversion feature was determined in accordance with ASC 470-20 - Debt with conversion and other options and is calculated at its intrinsic value being the difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the common stock into which the debt is convertible at the commitment date, being $3.28 per share, multiplied by the number of shares into which the debt is convertible. The Company had the right to redeem up to 95% of the principal amount on or prior to September 29, 2020 without penalty.

 

On September 29, 2020, the Company retired the convertible debenture, utilizing the proceeds received from the 7.5% Loan due 2023 entered into on the same date as described below.

 

The Company determined the conversion feature above did not meet the characteristics of a derivative instrument in accordance with ASC 815 - Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”), as the conversion feature is indexed to its own stock and is classified under Share Capital in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity. As such, there was no derivative liability associated with the Convertible Debenture under ASC 815.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded amortization of debt discount of $1,524.

 

Bridge loan

 

On June 16, 2020, the Company entered into a short-term definitive funding agreement with an institutional investor for gross proceeds of $15,000 (less transaction costs of approximately $943). The secured note has a maturity date of 4 months and bears an interest rate of 60% per annum. It is secured by, among other items, the Company’s cannabis operations in Illinois, New Jersey and Florida, as well as the Company’s U.S. intellectual property. In the event of default, the Company is obligated to pay the lender an additional fee of $6,000. The Company may pre-pay the secured note without penalty or premium at any time following the 90th day after closing.

 

In October 2020, the Company retired the short-term definitive funding agreement and paid in aggregate $18,050 to retire the full principal balance and accrued interest.

 

September 2020 transactions

 

On September 23, 2020, pursuant to the implementation of the Amended Arrangement (See Note 13), a subsidiary of Canopy Growth advanced gross proceeds of $50,000 (less transaction costs of approximately $4,025) to Universal Hemp, an affiliate of the Company, pursuant to the terms of a secured debenture (“6.1% Loan”). In accordance with the terms of the debenture, the funds cannot be used, directly or indirectly, in connection with or for any cannabis or cannabis-related operations in the United States, unless and until such operations comply with all applicable laws of the United States. An additional $50,000 may be advanced pursuant to the debenture subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions by Universal Hemp. The debenture bears interest at a rate of 6.1% per annum, matures 10 years from the date hereof or such earlier date in accordance with the terms of the debenture and all interest payments made pursuant to the debenture are payable in cash by Universal Hemp. The debenture is not convertible and is not guaranteed by Acreage.

 

With a portion of the proceeds for the 6.1% Loan received by Universal Hemp, Acreage engaged an Investment Advisor which, under the Investment Advisor’s sole discretion, invested on behalf of Universal Hemp $34,019 on September 28, 2020. As a result, Universal Hemp acquired 34,019 class B units, at $1.00 par value per unit, which represented 100% financial interest in the Investment Partnership, a Canada-based limited partnership. An affiliate of the Institutional Investor holds class A units of the Investment Partnership. The general partner of the Investment Partnership is also an affiliate of the Institutional Investor. The class B units are held by the Investment Advisor as an agent for Universal Hemp. Upon execution of the limited partnership agreement, $1,019 was distributed to the class A unit holders of the Investment Partnership.

 

On September 28, 2020 the Company received gross proceeds of $33,000 (less transaction costs of approximately $959) from an affiliate of the Institutional Investor (the “Lender”) and used a portion of the proceeds of this loan to retire its short-term $11,000 convertible note (as described above) and its short-term note aggregating approximately $18,000 in October 2020, with the remainder being used for working capital purposes. The loan is unsecured, matures in 3 years and bears interest at a 7.5% annual interest rate. The Lender is controlled by the Institutional Investor. The Investment Partnership is the investor in the Lender.

 

F-28

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Hempco Foros promissory note

 

In October 2020, Foros Securities LLC extended a promissory note of $2,000 to the Company bearing interest at 10% per annum. The promissory note matures at the earlier of July 5, 2021 or the date the principal is repaid in full.

 

Senior secured term loan facility

 

In October 2020, the Company’s subsidiary received initial commitments and funding from a syndicate of lenders for gross proceeds of $28,000 (before origination discounts and issuance costs of approximately $840 and $1,136, respectively) pursuant to a senior secured term loan facility at an annual interest rate of 15% with a maturity of 4 years from closing. The total amount available under the senior secured term loan facility is $70,000.

 

In connection with the advance, the Company issued the lenders an aggregate of 1,557 Fixed Share Warrants with each Fixed Share Warrant exercisable for one Fixed Share and 698 Floating Share Warrants with each Floating Share Warrant exercisable for one Floating Share. The exercise price of each Fixed Share Warrant is $3.15 and the exercise price of each Floating Share Warrant is $3.01. The warrants are exercisable for a period of 4 years.

 

Construction financing loan

 

In November 2020, the Company entered into a loan agreement with a cannabis-focused real estate investment trust for a construction financing loan in the amount of $13,320 (with transaction costs of approximately $1,399). The loan agreement provides for an annual interest rate of 16% and a term of 18 months. The loan will be used to complete the expansion of the Company’s cultivation and processing factory in Illinois (the “Illinois Property”). The loan is secured by the Illinois Property and is subject to periodic advances to the Company to fund the completion of improvements or real property collateral or fund other amounts as permitted under the loan agreement.

 

CanWell promissory note

 

In November 2020, the Company issued a promissory note to the Canwell LLC (“Canwell”), which is non-interest bearing and payable based on a payment schedule with ten payments in the aggregate amount of $7,750 through December 31, 2024.

 

11.       SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

The table below details the change in Pubco shares outstanding by class for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:

 

Shareholders’ Equity   Subordinate
Voting
Shares
    Subordinate
Voting Shares Held in Treasury
    Proportionate
Voting
Shares (as converted)
    Multiple
Voting
Shares
    Total Shares
Outstanding
 
December 31, 2018     21,943       (842 )     57,895       168       79,164  
Issuances     8,698                         8,698  
NCI conversions     2,784                         2,784  
PVS conversions     34,752             (34,752 )            
December 31, 2019     68,177       (842 )     23,143       168       90,646  
Issuances     9,518                         9,518  
NCI conversions     583                         583  
PVS conversions     1,231             (1,231 )            
Exchange pursuant to Amended Agreement     (79,509 )     842       (21,912 )     (168 )     (100,747 )
September 22, 2020                              

 

Shareholders’ Equity   Fixed
Shares
    Floating
Shares
    Fixed Shares
Held in
Treasury
    Floating
Shares Held
in
Treasury
    Fixed
Multiple
Shares
    Total Shares
Outstanding
 
September 23, 2020     70,994       30,476       (589 )     (253 )     118       100,746  
Issuances     352       152                         504  
December 31, 2020     71,346       30,628       (589 )     (253 )     118       101,250  

 

Pursuant to the Amended Arrangement, on September 23, 2020, Acreage completed a capital reorganization whereby (i) each existing SVS was exchanged for 0.7 of a Fixed Share and 0.3 of a Floating Share; (ii) each existing PVS was exchanged for 28 Fixed Shares and 12 Floating Shares; and (iii) each existing MVS was exchanged for 0.7 of a Fixed Multiple Share and 0.3 of a Floating Share. No fractional Fixed Shares, Fixed Multiple Shares or Floating Shares were issued pursuant to the Capital Reorganization. See Note 13 for further information.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 327 SVS (subsequently converted to 229 and 98 Fixed Shares and Floating Shares, respectively) as a result of the conversion of $550 of the Convertible Debenture (See Note 10), recorded in Issuances upon conversion of debenture on the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity. The Company also issued 200 SVS (subsequently converted to 140 Fixed Shares and 60 Floating Shares), in relation to the issuance of the commitment shares under the Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (See Note 13), recorded in Other equity transactions on the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 208 SVS as compensation for consulting services of $3,424, recorded in Other equity transactions on the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity.

 

Warrants

A summary of the warrants activity outstanding is as follows:

 

Warrants   January 1, 2020 to September 22, 2020     September 23, 2020 to December 31, 2020  
    SVS     Fixed Shares     Floating Shares  
Beginning balance     2,040       5,684       2,436  
Granted     6,085       1,557       698  
Expired     (4 )     (110 )     (47 )
Modification pursuant to Amended Arrangement     (8,121 )            
Ending balance           7,131       3,087  

 

F-29

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.  
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Warrants   Year ended December 31, 2019  
    SVS  
Beginning balance     2,259  
Granted     4  
Expired     (223 )
Ending balance     2,040  

 

On February 10, 2020, the Company raised $27,887, net of issuance costs, from a private placement of 6,085 special warrants priced at $4.93 per unit. Each special warrant was automatically exercised on March 2, 2020 for no additional consideration, into one unit comprised of one SVS and one SVS purchase warrant with an exercise price of $5.80 and a five-year term. Pursuant to the Amended Arrangement, the exercise price was thereafter amended to $4.00. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion. The Company evaluated the warrants for liability or equity classification in accordance with ASC 480 and determined that equity treatment was appropriate as the warrants only require settlement through the issuance of the Company’s common stock, which are not redeemable, and do not represent an obligation to issue a variable number of shares. Accordingly, the warrants were classified as equity and are not subject to remeasurement at each balance sheet date.

 

In November 2020, in connection with the senior secured credit term loan facility, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,557 Fixed Share Warrants with each Fixed Share Warrant exercisable for one Fixed Share and 698 Floating Share Warrants with each Floating Share Warrant exercisable for one Floating Share. The exercise price of each Fixed Share Warrant is $3.15 and the exercise price of each Floating Share Warrant is $3.01. The warrants are exercisable for a period of 4 years. Refer to Note 10 for further discussion.

 

Pursuant to the Amended Arrangement, the exercise price of all other warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2020 is $17.50 and $7.50 per Fixed Share and Floating Share, respectively. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion.

 

The weighted-average remaining contractual life of the warrants outstanding is approximately 4 years. There was no aggregate intrinsic value for warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2020.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 4 warrants with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $6.74 per share, and an expense of $27 was recorded in General and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

The exercise price of all warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2019 is $25 per share, and the weighted-average remaining contractual life of the warrants outstanding is approximately 2 years. There was no aggregate intrinsic value for warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2019.

 

Non-controlling interests - convertible units

The Company has NCIs in consolidated subsidiaries USCo2 and HSCP. The non-voting shares of USCo2 and HSCP units make up substantially all of the NCI balance as of December 31, 2020 and are convertible for either 0.7 of a Fixed Share and 0.3 of a Floating Share of Pubco or cash, as determined by the Company. Summarized financial information of HSCP is presented below. USCo2 does not have discrete financial information separate from HSCP.

 

F-30

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

HSCP net asset reconciliation   December 31, 2020     December 31, 2019  
Current assets   $ 144,938     $ 55,296  
Non-current assets     410,269       584,812  
Current liabilities     (80,649 )     (46,434 )
Non-current liabilities     (171,485 )     (75,219 )
Other NCI balances     (742 )     (1,041 )
Accumulated equity-settled expenses     (206,315 )     (111,934 )
Net assets   $ 96,016     $ 405,480  
HSCP/USCo2 ownership % of HSCP     18.68 %     21.64 %
Net assets allocated to USCo2/HSCP   $ 17,936     $ 87,746  
Net assets attributable to other NCIs     742       1,041  
Total NCI   $ 18,678     $ 88,787  

 

    Year Ended December 31,  
HSCP Summarized Statement of Operations   2020     2019  
Net loss allocable to HSCP/USCo2   $ (372,386 )   $ (191,511 )
HSCP/USCo2 weighted average ownership % of HSCP     19.66 %     23.44 %
Net loss allocated to HSCP/USCo2   $ (73,211 )   $ (44,890 )
Net loss allocated to other NCIs     (319 )     (4 )
Net loss attributable to NCIs   $ (73,530 )   $ (44,894 )

 

As of December 31, 2020, USCo2’s non-voting shares owned approximately 0.56% of HSCP units. USCo2’s capital structure is comprised of voting shares (approximately 70%), all of which are held by the Company, and of non-voting shares (approximately 30%) held by certain former HSCP members. Certain executive employees and profits interests holders own approximately 18.12% of HSCP units. The remaining 81.32% interest in HSCP is held by USCo and represents the members’ equity attributable to shareholders of the parent.

 

During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had several transactions with HSCP and USCo2 that changed its ownership interest in the subsidiaries but did not result in loss of control. These transactions included business acquisitions and the redemption of HSCP and USCo2 convertible units for Pubco shares (as shown in the table below), and resulted in a $3,395 and $2,766 allocation from NCI to shareholders' equity for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company made cash payments in the amount of $4,278 to HSCP and USCo2 unit holders in satisfaction of redemption requests the Company chose to settle in cash, as well as for LLC unitholders tax liabilities in accordance with the HSCP operating agreement.

 

F-31

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.  
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
(in thousands, except per share data)  

 

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of convertible units is as follows:

 

    Year Ended December 31,  
Convertible Units   2020     2019  
Beginning balance     25,035       27,340  
Issuance of NCI units           198  
Vested LLC C-1s canceled     (1,310 )     (416 )
LLC C-1s vested     1,000       755  
NCI units settled in cash           (58 )
NCI units converted to Pubco     (583 )     (2,784 )
Ending balance     24,142       25,035  

 

12.       EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE

 

Equity-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods presented is as follows:

 

Equity-based compensation expense   Year Ended December 31,  
    2020     2019     2018  
Equity-based compensation - Plan   $ 57,624     $ 62,946     $ 9,862  
Equity-based compensation - Plan (Plan of Arrangement Awards) (1)     17,139       23,056        
Equity-based compensation - other     17,301       11,536       1,368  
Total equity-based compensation expense   $ 92,064     $ 97,538     $ 11,230  

 

(1) In accordance with the Prior Plan of Arrangement (as defined in Note 13) with Canopy Growth, awards were granted in July 2019, and amortized based on the vesting schedule set forth herein.

 

Amended Arrangement with Canopy Growth

 

On September 23, 2020, the Company announced the implementation of the Amended Arrangement (as defined in Note 13). Pursuant to the Amended Arrangement, the Company’s articles have been amended to create new Fixed Shares, Floating Shares and Fixed Multiple Shares. Consequently, the Company’s equity-based compensation was modified into new equity awards of the Company. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion.

 

Equity-based compensation - Plan (Acreage Holdings, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan)

 

In connection with the RTO transaction, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted an Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended May 7, 2019, June 19, 2019 and September 23, 2020 (the “Plan”), which permits the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, share units, performance shares, performance units and other stock-based awards up to an amount equal to 15% of the issued and outstanding Subordinate Voting Shares of the Company.

 

Pursuant to the Amended Arrangement, the Company retained the Plan described above, the upper limit of issuances being up to an amount equal to 15% of the issued and outstanding Fixed Shares and Floating Shares of the Company.

 

F-32

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”)

 

    January 1, 2020 to
September 22, 2020
   

Year Ended

December 31, 2019

 

Restricted Share Units

(Fair value information expressed in whole dollars)

  RSUs     Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
    RSUs     Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Unvested, beginning of period     7,843     $ 15.10       2,032     $ 24.53  
Granted (1)     4,970       3.60       7,986       14.28  
Forfeited     (2,654 )     11.29       (117 )     17.85  
Vested     (2,998 )     11.60       (2,058 )     21.06  
Unvested, end of period     7,161     $ 9.99       7,843     $ 15.10  
Vested and unreleased     136      $ 16.33                  
Exchanged pursuant to Amended Agreement     (7,297 )     N/A                  
Outstanding, September 22, 2020          $                  

 

    September 23, 2020 to December 31, 2020  
    Fixed Shares     Floating Shares  

Restricted Share Units

(Fair value information expressed in whole dollars)

  RSUs     Weighted
Average
Grand Date
Fair Value
    RSUs     Weighted
Average
Grand Date
Fair Value
 
Unvested, September 23, 2020 (1)     5,012     $ 9.99       2,148     $ 9.99  
Granted     623     $ 3.21       1,193     $ 2.07  
Forfeited     (94 )   $ 4.66       (40 )   $ 4.66  
Vested     (422 )   $ 10.32       (613 )   $ 4.41  
Unvested, end of period     5,119     $ 9.24       2,688     $ 7.83  
Vested and unreleased     211     $ 8.99       522     $ 3.16  
Outstanding, end of the period     5,330     $ 9.23       3,210     $ 7.07  

 

RSUs of the Company generally vest over a period of two years. The fair value for RSUs is based on the Company’s share price on the date of the grant. The Company recorded $37,801 and $59,627 as compensation expense during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The fair value of RSUs vested during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $10,779 and $23,470, respectively.

 

The total weighted average remaining contractual life and aggregate intrinsic value of unvested RSUs at December 31, 2020 was approximately 2 years and $21,635, respectively. Unrecognized compensation expense related to these awards at December 31, 2020 was $84,325 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2 years.

 

There were 211 Fixed RSUs and 522 Floating RSUs that were pending delivery or deferred as of December 31, 2020. 80 vested RSUs were pending delivery or deferred as of December 31, 2019. On February 20, 2020, the Company issued 1,505 RSUs to certain executives with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $5.11 per share. 148 of the 1,505 RSUs vested immediately. Certain shares are subject to restriction thus a discount for lack of marketability was applied that correlates to the period of time. On March 13, 2020, the Company issued 630 RSUs to employees of the Company. All of these units vested immediately, with a fair market value of $2.15, which was the closing price of the Company’s subordinate voting shares on March 13, 2020. On December 31, 2020, the Company issued 559 Fixed RSUs and 1,166 Floating RSUs to certain executives with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $3.15 and $2.05 per share, respectively. 103 of the 559 Fixed RSUs and 476 of the 1,166 Floating RSUs vested immediately, 178 Fixed RSUs and 117 Floating RSUs vest annually over 3 years, 278 Fixed RSUs and 183 Floating RSUs vest based on certain performance conditions and 390 Floating RSUs vest quarterly over one year.

 

(1) Equity-based compensation - Plan (Plan of Arrangement Awards)

 

Included in the RSUs granted during the year ended December 31, 2020 are “Plan of Arrangement Awards” issued in connection with the RSUs which were granted in June and July 2019:

 

On June 27, 2019, pursuant to the Original Arrangement Agreement (as defined in Note 13), 4,909 RSUs were awarded in total to five executive employees under the Plan. These awards vest as follows: 25% in June 2020, 25% in June 2021 and 50% three months following the Acquisition (as defined in Note 13). The Company recorded $12,186 as compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2020 in connection with these awards. A discount for lack of marketability was applied that correlates to the period of time certain of these shares are subject to restriction.

 

F-33

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

On July 31, 2019, the Company issued 1,778 RSUs to employees with unvested RSUs and stock options ("make-whole awards") as at the date of the Option Premium payment (as defined in Note 13). The RSUs were issued to provide additional incentive for employees that were not eligible to receive the full Option Premium and were subject to the same vesting terms as the unvested options and RSUs held as of the grant date. The Company recorded $4,953 as compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2020 in connection with these awards.

 

Stock options

 

    January 1, 2020 to
September 22, 2020
    Year Ended December 31, 2019  
Stock Options
(Exercise price expressed in whole dollars)
  Options     Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
    Options     Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Options outstanding, beginning of period     5,608     $ 21.56       4,605     $ 25.00  
Granted     191       5.75       1,785       14.04  
Forfeited     (1,301 )     15.59       (782 )     24.68  
Exercised                        
Modification pursuant to Amended Arrangement     (4,498 )     N/A              
Options outstanding, September 22, 2020         $       5,608     $ 21.56  

 

    September 23, 2020 to December 31, 2020  
    Fixed Shares     Floating Shares  
Stock Options
(Exercise price expressed in whole dollars)
  Options     Weighted Average Exercise Price     Options     Weighted Average Exercise Price  
Options outstanding, September 23, 2020     3,148     $ 15.83       1,349     $ 6.78  
Granted     367     $ 3.15       1,308     $ 2.05  
Forfeited     (33 )   $ 10.37       (14 )   $ 4.44  
Exercised         $           $  
Cancelled     (1,926 )   $ 17.26       (825 )   $ 7.40  
Options outstanding, end of period     1,556     $ 11.18       1,818     $ 3.12  
                                 
Options exercisable, end of period     810     $ 15.42       1,316     $ 3.25  

 

Stock options of the Company generally vest over a period of three years and have an expiration period of 10 years. The weighted average contractual life remaining for options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2020 was approximately 7 years and 4 years, respectively. The Company recorded $36,962 and $26,375 as compensation expense during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, in connection with these awards.

 

On December 31, 2020, the Company issued 367 Fixed Options and 1,308 Floating Options to certain executives with an exercise price of $3.15 and $2.05 per share, respectively. 89 of the 367 Fixed Options and 59 of the 1,308 Floating Options vest annually over three years, 278 Fixed Options and 183 Floating Options vest based on certain performance conditions, 968 Floating Options were fully exercisable at grant date and 98 Floating options vest quarterly over one year. On December 31, 2020, 1,926 Fixed options and 825 Floating options were surrendered by option holders. In accordance with ASC 718, previously unrecognized compensation was recognized on cancellation date. The Company recorded $30,685 as compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2020 for the canceled options.

 

As of December 31, 2020, unamortized expense related to stock options totaled $5,254 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1 year. As of December 31, 2020, the aggregate intrinsic value for unvested options outstanding was nil and $7 for the Fixed Share options and the Floating Share options, respectively.

 

The fair values of Subordinate Voting Share options granted were calculated using a Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions:

 

Black-Scholes inputs   January 1, 2020 to
September 22, 2020
   

Year Ended
December 31, 2019

 
Weighted average grant date fair value range   $ 3.79       $4.76 - $16.72  
Assumption ranges:                
Risk-free rate     1.60 %     1.50% - 2.60%  
Expected dividend yield     %     —%  
Expected term (in years)     6       6  
Expected volatility     75 %     75% - 85%  

The fair values of Fixed and Floating Share options granted were calculated using a Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions:

 

Black-Scholes inputs   September 23, 2020 to December 31, 2020  
    Fixed Shares     Floating Shares  
Weighted average grant date fair value range     $1.06 - $1.63       $0.92 - $1.06  
Assumption ranges:                
Risk-free rate     0.20 %     0.20%  
Expected dividend yield     %     —%  
Expected term (in years)     3.25 - 3.5       2.5 - 3.5  
Expected volatility     75 %     75%  

 

Volatility was estimated by using the average historical volatility of a representative peer group of publicly traded cannabis companies. The expected term represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate is based on U.S. Treasury bills with a remaining term equal to the expected term.

 

Equity-based compensation - other

 

HSCP C-1 Profits Interests Units (“Profits Interests”)

 

These membership units qualify as profits interests for U.S. federal income tax purposes and were accounted for in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. HSCP amortizes awards over service period and until awards are fully vested.

 

F-34

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

The following table summarizes the status of unvested Profits Interests for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018:

 

   

Year Ended
December 31, 2020

   

Year Ended
December 31, 2019

   

Year Ended
December 31, 2018

 

Profits Interests

(Fair value information expressed in whole dollars)

  Number
of Units
    Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair
Value
    Number
of Units
    Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair
Value
    Number
of Units
    Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair
Value
 
Unvested, beginning of period     1,000     $ 0.43       1,825     $ 0.43           $  
Class C-1 units granted                             4,284       0.48  
Class C-1 units canceled                 (70 )     0.43       (847 )     0.64  
Class C-1 vested     (1,000 )     0.43       (755 )     0.43       (1,612 )     0.43  
Unvested, end of period                   1,000     $ 0.43       1,825     $ 0.43  

 

The Company recorded $70, $369 and $1,053 as compensation expense in connection with these awards during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The fair value of Profits Interests vested during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 and 2018 was $1,239, $13,141 and $690, respectively.

 

As of December 31, 2019, unamortized expense related to unvested Profits Interests totaled $70 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1 year.

 

Restricted Shares (“RSs”)

 

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Form Factory (refer to Note 3), 1,369 restricted shares with a grant date fair value of $20.45 were issued to former employees of Form Factory subject to future service conditions, which fully vest 24 months from the acquisition date. The fair value for RSs is based on the Company’s share price on the date of the grant. In connection with these awards, the Company recorded compensation expense of $17,231 and $9,528 during the year ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. There was no comparable RS activity during the years ended December 31, 2018.

 

F-35

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Employee settlement

 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 82 Subordinate Voting Shares and recognized $1,639 of compensation expense in settlement of post-employment expenses.

 

Forgiveness of notes receivable

 

The Company forgave $315 of notes receivable from certain employees in recognition of services rendered during the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

13.            COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Commitments

 

The Company provides revolving lines of credit to several of its portfolio companies. Refer to Note 6 for further discussion.

 

Definitive agreements

 

On April 17, 2019, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Deep Roots Medical LLC (“Deep Roots”), a vertically integrated license holder in Nevada, for consideration of 4,762 HSCP units and $20,000 in cash. The Company announced the termination of the agreement by Deep Roots on April 3, 2020 following March 31, 2020, the end date for consummating the transaction.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all ownership interests in GCCC Management, LLC, a management company overseeing the operations of Greenleaf Compassionate Care Center, Inc., a non-profit cultivation and processing facility in Rhode Island, for cash consideration of $10,000. The agreement terminated in April 2020.

 

Prior Plan of Arrangement with Canopy Growth

 

On June 19, 2019, the shareholders of the Company and of Canopy Growth separately approved the proposed plan of arrangement (the “Prior Plan of Arrangement”) involving the two companies, and on June 21, 2019, the Supreme Court of British Columbia granted a final order approving the Prior Plan of Arrangement. Effective June 27, 2019, the articles of the Company were amended pursuant to the Prior Plan of Arrangement to provide that, upon the occurrence (or waiver by Canopy Growth) of the Triggering Event, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set out in the arrangement agreement entered into between Acreage and Canopy Growth on April 18, 2019, as amended on May 15, 2019 (the “Original Arrangement Agreement”), Canopy Growth will acquire (the “Acquisition”) all of the issued and outstanding shares in the capital of the Company (each, an “Acreage Share”). Under the terms of the Original Arrangement Agreement, holders of Acreage Shares and certain securities convertible or exchangeable into SVS as of the close of business on June 26, 2019, received approximately $2.63, being their pro rata portion (on an as converted to SVS basis) of $300,000 (the “Option Premium”) paid by Canopy Growth.

 

F-36

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

HSCP unit holders are required to convert their units within three years following the closing of the Acquisition as will holders of non-voting shares of USCo2.

 

Second Amendment to the Arrangement Agreement with Canopy Growth

 

On June 24, 2020, Acreage and Canopy Growth entered into a proposal agreement (the “Proposal Agreement”) which set out, among other things, the terms and conditions upon which the parties were proposing to enter into an amending agreement (the “Amending Agreement”) to amend the Original Arrangement Agreement, amend and restate the Prior Plan of Arrangement (the “Amended Plan of Arrangement”) and implement the Amended Plan of Arrangement pursuant to the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia). The effectiveness of the amendment to the Original Arrangement Agreement and the implementation of the Amended Plan of Arrangement was subject to the conditions set out in the Proposal Agreement, which included, among others, approval by (i) the Supreme Court of British Columbia at a hearing upon the procedural and substantive fairness of the terms and conditions of the Amended Arrangement; and (ii) the shareholders of Acreage as required by applicable corporate and securities laws.

 

Following the satisfaction of various conditions set forth in the Proposal Agreement, on September 23, 2020, Acreage and Canopy Growth entered into the Amending Agreement (and together with the Original Arrangement Agreement, the “Arrangement Agreement”) and implemented the Amended Arrangement effective at 12:01 a.m. (Vancouver time) (the “Amendment Time”) on September 23, 2020 (the “Amendment Date”). Pursuant to the Amended Plan of Arrangement, Canopy Growth made a cash payment of $37,500 to Acreage’s shareholders and certain holders of securities convertible or exchangeable into shares of Acreage. Acreage also completed a capital reorganization (the “Capital Reorganization”) effective as of the Amendment Time whereby: (i) each existing SVS was exchanged for 0.7 of a Fixed Share and 0.3 of a Floating Share; (ii) each issued and outstanding PVS was exchanged for 28 Fixed Shares and 12 Floating Shares; and (iii) each issued and outstanding MVS was exchanged for 0.7 of a Fixed Multiple Share and 0.3 of a Floating Share.

 

At the Amendment Time, on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Amended Plan of Arrangement, each option, restricted share unit, compensation option and warrant to acquire existing SVS that was outstanding immediately prior to the Amendment Time, was exchanged for a replacement option, restricted stock unit, compensation option or warrant, as applicable, to acquire Fixed Shares (a “Fixed Share Replacement Security”) and a replacement option, restricted stock unit, compensation option or warrant, as applicable, to acquire Floating Shares (a “Floating Share Replacement Security”) in order to account for the Capital Reorganization.

 

Pursuant to the Amended Plan of Arrangement, upon the occurrence or waiver (at the discretion of Canopy Growth) of the Triggering Event (the “Triggering Event Date”), Canopy Growth will, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions set out in the Arrangement Agreement: (i) acquire all of the issued and outstanding Fixed Shares (following the mandatory conversion of the Fixed Multiple Shares into Fixed Shares) on the basis of 0.3048 of a common share of Canopy Growth (each whole common share, a “Canopy Growth Share”) for each Fixed Share held (the “Fixed Exchange Ratio”) at the time of the acquisition of the Fixed Shares (the “Acquisition Time”), subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Amended Plan of Arrangement (the “Canopy Call Option”); and (ii) have the right (but not the obligation) (the “Floating Call Option”), exercisable for a period of 30 days following the Triggering Event Date to acquire all of the issued and outstanding Floating Shares at a price to be determined based upon the 30 day volume-weighted average trading price of the Floating Shares, subject to a minimum price of $6.41, as may be adjusted in accordance with the terms of the Amended Plan of Arrangement, to be payable, at the option of Canopy Growth, in cash, Canopy Growth Shares or a combination thereof. If any portion is paid in Canopy Growth Shares, the number of Canopy Growth Shares to be exchanged for each Floating Share shall be determined on the basis of a 30 day volume-weighted average calculation using the Floating Shares (the “Floating Ratio”). The closing of the acquisition of the Floating Shares pursuant to the Floating Call Option, if exercised, will take place concurrently with the closing of the acquisition of the Fixed Shares pursuant to the Canopy Call Option, if exercised. The Canopy Call Option and the Floating Call Option will expire 10 years from the Amendment Time.

 

F-37

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

At the Acquisition Time, on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Amended Plan of Arrangement, each Fixed Share Replacement Security will be exchanged for a replacement option, restricted stock unit, compensation option or warrant, as applicable, to acquire from Canopy Growth such number of Canopy Growth Shares as is equal to: (i) the number of Fixed Shares that were issuable upon exercise of such Fixed Share Replacement Security immediately prior to the Acquisition Time, multiplied by (ii) the Fixed Exchange Ratio in effect immediately prior to the Acquisition Time (provided that if the foregoing would result in the issuance of a fraction of a Canopy Growth Share, then the number of Canopy Growth Shares to be issued will be rounded down to the nearest whole number).

 

F-38

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

In the event that the Floating Call Option is exercised and Canopy Growth acquires the Floating Shares at the Acquisition Time, on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Amended Plan of Arrangement, each Floating Share Replacement Security will be exchanged for a replacement option, restricted stock unit, compensation option or warrant, as applicable, to acquire from Canopy Growth such number of Canopy Growth Shares as is equal to: (i) the number of Floating Shares that were issuable upon exercise of such Floating Share Replacement Security immediately prior to the Acquisition Time, multiplied by (ii) the Floating Ratio (provided that if the foregoing would result in the issuance of a fraction of a Canopy Growth Share, then the number of Canopy Growth Shares to be issued will be rounded down to the nearest whole number).

 

In the event that the Floating Call Option is exercised and Canopy Growth acquires the Floating Shares at the Acquisition Time, Acreage will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Canopy Growth.

 

The Amending Agreement also provides for, among other things, amendments to the definition of Purchaser Approved Share Threshold (as defined in the Arrangement Agreement) to change the number of shares of Acreage available to be issued by Acreage without an adjustment in the Fixed Exchange Ratio such that Acreage may issue a maximum of 32,700 shares (or convertible securities in proportion to the foregoing), which will include (i) 3,700 Floating Shares which are to be issued solely in connection with the exercise of stock options granted to Acreage management (the “Option Shares”); (ii) 8,700 Floating Shares other than the Option Shares; and (iii) 20,300 Fixed Shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Amending Agreement provides that Acreage may not issue any equity securities, without Canopy Growth’s prior consent, other than: (i) upon the exercise or conversion of convertible securities outstanding as of the Amendment Date; (ii) contractual commitments existing as of the Amendment Date; (iii) the Option Shares; (iv) the issuance of up to $3,000 worth of Fixed Shares pursuant to an at-the-market offering to be completed no more than four times during any one-year period; (v) the issuance of up to 500 Fixed Shares in connection with debt financing transactions that are otherwise in compliance with the terms of the Arrangement Agreement, as amended by the Amending Agreement; or (vi) pursuant to one private placement or public offering of securities during any one-year period for aggregate gross proceeds of up to $20,000, subject to specific limitations as set out in the Amending Agreement.

 

In addition, the Amending Agreement provides for, among other things: (i) various Canopy Growth rights that extend beyond the Acquisition Date and continue until Canopy Growth ceases to hold at least 35% of the issued and outstanding Acreage shares (such date being the “End Date”), including, among others, rights to nominate a majority of Acreage’s Board of Directors (the “Acreage Board”) following the Acquisition Time, restrictions on Acreage’s ability to incur certain indebtedness without Canopy Growth’s consent; (ii) restrictive covenants in respect of the business conduct in favor of Canopy Growth; (iii) termination of non-competition and exclusivity rights granted to Acreage by Canopy Growth in the Arrangement Agreement in the event that Acreage does not meet certain specified financial targets on an annual basis during the term of the Canopy Call Option as further described below; (iv) implementation of further restrictions on Acreage’s ability to operate its business, including its ability to hire certain employees or make certain payments or incur any non-trade-payable debt without Canopy Growth’s consent in the event that Acreage does not meet certain specified financial targets on a quarterly basis during the term of the Canopy Call Option as further described below; and (v) termination of the Arrangement Agreement and Canopy Growth’s obligation to complete the acquisition of the Fixed Shares pursuant to the Canopy Call Option in the event that Acreage does not meet certain specified financial targets in the trailing 12 month period as further described below. Each of the financial targets referred to above is specified in the Amending Agreement and related to the performance of Acreage relative to a business plan for Acreage for each fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 through December 31, 2029 set forth in the Proposal Agreement (the “Initial Business Plan”).

 

The Amending Agreement precludes Acreage from entering into any contract in respect of Company Debt (as defined in the Arrangement Agreement) if, among other restrictions: (i) such contract would be materially inconsistent with market standards for companies operating in the United States cannabis industry; (ii) such contract prohibits a prepayment of the principal amount of such Company Debt, requires a make-whole payment for the interest owing during the remainder of the term of such contract or charges a prepayment fee in an amount greater than 3.0% of the principal amount to be repaid; (iii) such contract would provide for interest payments to be paid through the issuance of securities as opposed to cash; or (iv) such contract has a principal amount of more than $10,000 or a Cost of Capital (as defined in the Amending Agreement) that is greater than 30.0% per annum; provided that, if such Company Debt is fully secured by cash in a blocked account, the Cost of Capital may not be greater than 3.0% per annum. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Canopy Growth’s consent will not be required for Acreage or any of its subsidiaries to enter into a maximum of two transactions for Company Debt that would require consent based on the foregoing during any one-year period, in accordance with the following terms: (i) the principal amount of the Company Debt per transaction may not exceed $10,000, (ii) the Company Debt is not convertible into any securities; and (iii) the contract does not provide for the issuance of more than 500 Acreage shares (or securities convertible into or exchangeable for 500 Acreage shares).

 

F-39

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

The Amending Agreement also provides for certain financial reporting obligations and that Acreage may not nominate or appoint any new director or appoint any new officer that does not meet certain specified criteria. The Amending Agreement also requires Acreage to submit a business plan to Canopy Growth on a quarterly basis that complies with certain specified criteria, including the Initial Business Plan. In the event that Acreage has not satisfied: (i) 90% of the minimum revenue and earnings targets set forth in the Initial Business Plan measured on a quarterly basis, certain additional restrictive covenants will become operative as austerity measures for Acreage’s business; (ii) 80% of the minimum revenue and earnings targets set forth in the Initial Business Plan, as determined on an annual basis, certain restrictive covenants applicable to Canopy Growth under the Arrangement Agreement will cease to apply in order to permit Canopy Growth to acquire, or conditionally acquire, a competitor of Acreage in the United States should it wish to do so; and (iii) 60% of the minimum revenue and earnings targets set forth in the Initial Business Plan for the trailing 12 month period ending on the date that is 30 days prior to the proposed Acquisition Time, a material adverse impact will be deemed to have occurred for purposes of Section 6.2(2)(h) of the Arrangement Agreement and Canopy Growth will not be required to complete the acquisition of the Fixed Shares pursuant to the Canopy Call Option.

 

The Amending Agreement also requires Acreage to limit its operations to the Identified States (as defined in the Amending Agreement). In connection with the execution of the Proposal Agreement, Acreage was provided with consent from Canopy Growth to divest of all assets outside of the Identified States (the “Non-Core Divestitures”).

 

In addition, the Amending Agreement includes certain covenants that will apply following the Acquisition Time until the earlier of the date on which the Floating Shares are acquired by Canopy Growth or the End Date. Such covenants include, among others, pre-emptive rights and top-up rights in favor of Canopy Growth, restrictions on M&A activities, approval rights for Acreage’s quarterly business plan, nomination rights for a majority of the directors on the Acreage Board and certain audit and inspection rights.

 

Debenture

 

In connection with the implementation of the Amended Arrangement, pursuant to a secured debenture dated September 23, 2020 (the “Debenture”) issued by Universal Hemp, LLC, an affiliate of Acreage that operates solely in the hemp industry in full compliance with all applicable laws (the “Borrower”), to 11065220 Canada Inc., an affiliate of Canopy Growth (the “Lender”), the Lender agreed to provide a loan of up to $100,000 (the “Loan”), $50,000 of which was advanced on the Amendment Date (the “Initial Advance”), and $50,000 of the Loan will be advanced in the event that the following conditions, among others, are satisfied: (a) the Borrower’s EBITDA (as defined in the Debenture) for any 90 day period is greater than or equal to 2.0 times the interest costs associated with the Initial Advance; and (b) the Borrower’s business plan for the 12 months following the applicable 90 day period supports an Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Debenture) of at least 2.00:1.

 

The principal amount of the Loan will bear interest from the date of advance, compounded annually, and be payable on each anniversary of the date of the Debenture in cash in U.S. dollars at a rate of 6.1% per annum. The Loan will mature 10 years from the date of the Initial Advance.

 

The Loan must be used exclusively for U.S. hemp-related operations and on the express condition that such amount will not be used, directly or indirectly, in connection with or for the operation or benefit of any of the Borrower’s affiliates other than subsidiaries of the Borrower exclusively engaged in U.S. hemp-related operations and not directly or indirectly, towards the operation or funding of any activities that are not permissible under applicable law. The Loan proceeds must be segregated in a distinct bank account and detailed records of debits to such distinct bank account will be maintained by the Borrower.

 

F-40

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

No payment due and payable to the Lender by the Borrower pursuant to the Debenture may be made using funds directly or indirectly derived from any cannabis or cannabis-related operations in the United States, unless and until the Triggering Event Date.

 

The Debenture includes usual and typical events of default for a financing of this nature, including, without limitation, if: (i) Acreage is in breach or default of any representation or warranty in any material respect pursuant to the Arrangement Agreement; (ii) the Non-Core Divestitures are not completed within 18 months from the Amendment Date; and (iii) Acreage fails to perform or comply with any covenant or obligation in the Arrangement Agreement which is not remedied within 30 days after written notice is given to the Borrower by the Lender. The Debenture also includes customary representations and warranties, positive covenants and negative covenants of the Borrower.

 

Surety bonds

 

The Company has indemnification obligations with respect to surety bonds primarily used as security against non-performance in the amount of $5,000 as of December 31, 2020, for which no liabilities are recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

 

The Company is subject to other capital commitments and similar obligations. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, such amounts were not material.

 

F-41

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Contingencies

 

As of December 31, 2020, the Company has consulting fees payable in Fixed Shares and Floating Shares which are contingent upon successful acquisition of certain state cannabis licenses. The Company had maximum obligations of $8,750 and 280 Fixed Shares and 120 Floating Shares. No reserve for the contingencies has been recorded as of December 31, 2020.

 

The Company’s operations are subject to a variety of local and state regulations. Failure to comply with one or more of those regulations could result in fines, restrictions on its operations, or losses of permits that could result in the Company’s applicable subsidiaries ceasing operations. While management of the Company believes that the Company’s subsidiaries is in compliance with applicable local and state regulations as of December 31, 2020, cannabis regulations continue to evolve and are subject to differing interpretations. As a result, the Company’s subsidiaries may be subject to regulatory fines, penalties, or restrictions in the future.

 

The Company and its subsidiaries may be, from time to time, subject to various administrative, regulatory and other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Contingent liabilities associated with legal proceedings are recorded when a liability is probable, and the contingent liability can be reasonably estimated.

 

Standby Equity Distribution Definitive Agreement

 

On May 29, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement with an institutional lender for $50,000 of financing commitments under a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (“SEDA”). The investor may, at its discretion, purchase, and the Company may, at its discretion, periodically sell to the investor, up to $35,000 and $15,000 of the Company’s Fixed Shares and Floating Shares, respectively, at a purchase price of 95% of the market price over the course of 24 months from the effective date. In consideration for entering the SEDA, the Company issued the investor 200 SVS as commitment shares. Pursuant to the Amended Arrangement, the shares have since been exchanged for 140 Fixed Shares and 60 Floating Shares. Refer to Note 17 for further discussion.

 

New York outstanding litigation

 

On November 2, 2018, EPMMNY LLC (“EPMMNY”) filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, asserting claims against 16 defendants, including NYCANNA, Impire State Holdings LLC, NY Medicinal Research & Caring, LLC (each, a wholly-owned subsidiary of High Street) and High Street. The Index Number for the action is 655480/2018. EPMMNY alleges that it was wrongfully deprived of a minority equity interest and management role in NYCANNA by its former partner, New Amsterdam Distributors, LLC, which attempted to directly or indirectly sell or transfer EPMMNY’s alleged interest in NYCANNA to other entities in 2016 and 2017, including Impire, NYMRC and High Street. EPMMNY alleges that it is entitled to the value of its alleged minority interest in NYCANNA or minority ownership in NYCANNA. EPMMNY also alleges that certain defendants misused its alleged intellectual property and/or services, improperly solicited its employees, and aided and abetted or participated in the transfer of equity and/or business opportunities from EPMMNY. High Street intends to vigorously defend this action, which the Company firmly believes is without merit. EPMMNY alleges that it was improperly deprived of its equity stake in NYCANNA before NYCANNA was acquired by High Street. High Street is also entitled to full indemnity from the claims asserted against it by EPMMNY pursuant to the purchase agreement pertaining to its acquisition of NYCANNA and personal guarantee by the largest shareholders of the seller. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on April 1, 2019. The motion was fully briefed and submitted to the Court on July 18, 2019, and oral argument was heard on September 6, 2019. The motion remains pending before the Court. A Special Referee hearing relating to the motion to dismiss has been scheduled for May 2021. The plaintiff also filed a motion seeking a preliminary injunction of any transfer of our assets. This motion was fully briefed and we are awaiting the court’s decision.

 

F-42

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

CanWell Dispute

 

The CanWell dispute is comprised of five separate proceedings:

 

i. CanWell's petition filed in Rhode Island Superior Court (C.A. KM-2019-0948) to compel arbitration of claims arising out of WPMC withdrawal as a member of the CanWell entities as well as other disputes, including issues relating to termination of the Alternative Dosage Agreement (“ADA”) (relating to the Maine dispensary).

 

ii. CanWell's petition filed in Rhode Island Superior Court (C.A. No. KM-2019-1047) to compel arbitration of WPMC's redemption of the CanWell entity's interest in WPMC, including issues relating to termination of the ADA.

 

iii. An arbitration proceeding relating to WPMC's withdrawal from the CanWell entities. A procedural meeting with the arbitrator took place on November 5, 2019.

 

iv. An arbitration that will soon be underway with the American Arbitration Association on the issue of whether WPMC had the right to redeem CanWell's interest in WPMC.

 

v. A civil action pending in Maine (Docket No. CUMSC-CV-19-0357) which was filed by Northeast Patients Group d/b/a Wellness Connection of Maine against CanWell, LLC and CanWell Processing (Maine), LLC, relating to the termination of the ADA. While no Acreage affiliate is currently a party to this action, the issue being litigated relates to the termination of the ADA, which is one of the issues that CanWell is attempting to arbitrate in Rhode Island.

 

vi. A declaratory judgment action pending in Delaware, High Street Capital Partners, LLC v. CanWell, LLC, CanWell Processing (Maine), LLC, and CanWell Processing (Rhode Island), LLC (Court of Chancery, No. 2019-0957-MTZ) seeking a declaratory judgment that, as a matter of law, High Street is not subject to any non-compete provision with regard to the agreements detailed above. This case remains in the preliminary stages of litigation.

 

The Court issued an order on January 29, 2020 that determined that the arbitrability of the ADA Disputes is to be decided by an arbitrator, not the Court.

 

Following the parties’ entering into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on proposed settlement terms that would settle each of the matters listed above, the parties have now reached a final confidential settlement agreement. As part of that agreement, the Company has accrued for $7,750 in Loss on legal settlements on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2020. In connection with this settlement agreement, the Company issued a promissory note in the amount of $7,750 to CanWell, which is non-interest bearing and is payable in periodic payments through December 31, 2024, of which the first payment of $500 was made in November 2020.

 

Lease Dispute

 

On or around December 2019, it is alleged that a wholly-owned subsidiary of HSCP entered into three five-year leases to occupy approximately 70 square feet of commercial space on a cannabis cultivation campus in California. As of November 24, 2020, HSCP and its wholly-owned subsidiary entered into a confidential settlement and release agreement with the commercial landlord, pursuant to which HSCP will make six payments to the commercial landlord totaling $6,336, which the Company has accrued for in Loss on legal settlements on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for year ended December 31, 2020. The first and second payments of $1,000 was made in November 2020 and December 2020, respectively, and the final payment will be due on December 31, 2021.

 

F-43

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

14.            RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

Transactions with related parties are entered into in the normal course of business and are measured at the amount established and agreed to by the parties.

 

Related party notes receivable

 

Acreage has certain outstanding notes receivable with related parties. Refer to Note 6 for further discussion.

 

GreenAcreage

 

The Company has an investment carried at fair value through profit and loss in GreenAcreage Real Estate (“GreenAcreage”). The Company also has an equity method investment in the management company of GreenAcreage resulting from Kevin Murphy’s board involvement. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company sold and subsequently leased back several of its capital assets in a transaction with GreenAcreage. The subsequent leases met the criteria for finance leases, and as such, the transactions do not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment.

 

F-44

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

On July 15, 2020, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a definitive agreement with GreenAcreage to internalize the Company’s management operations.

 

In November 2020, the Company completed an exchange of all its equity interests in GreenAcreage and its equity method investment in the management company of GreenAcreage in exchange for a land and building previously accounted for as a failed sales-leaseback transaction.

 

September 2020 Transactions

 

As disclosed in footnote 10 to the consolidated financial statements, ”September 2020 Transactions”, on September 23, 2020, pursuant to the implementation of the Amended Arrangement, a subsidiary of Canopy Growth advanced gross proceeds of $50,000 (less transaction costs of approximately $4,025) to Universal Hemp, an affiliate of the Company, pursuant to the terms of a secured debenture. In accordance with the terms of the debenture, the funds cannot be used, directly or indirectly, in connection with or for any cannabis or cannabis-related operations in the United States, unless and until such operations comply with all applicable laws of the United States. Acreage then engaged an investment advisor (the “Investment Advisor”) which, under the Investment Advisor’s sole discretion, invested on behalf of Universal Hemp, $34,019 of the proceeds on September 28, 2020.

 

As a result, Universal Hemp, a subsidiary of the Company, acquired 34,019 class B units, at $1 par value per unit, which represented 100% financial interest in an Investment Partnership, a Canada-based limited partnership. An affiliate of the Institutional Investor holds Class A Units of the Investment Partnership. The general partner of the Investment Partnership is also an affiliate of the Institutional Investor. The class B units are held by the Institutional Investor as agent for Universal Hemp. On September 28, 2020, the Company received gross proceeds of $33,000 (less transaction costs of approximately $959) from an affiliate of the Institutional Lender (the “Lender”) and used a portion of the proceeds of this loan to retire its short-term $11,000 convertible note and its short-term note aggregating approximately $18,000 in October 2020, with the remainder being used for working capital purposes. The Lender is controlled by the Institutional Lender. The Investment Partnership is the investor in the Lender.

 

Related party debt

 

In December 2019, Kevin Murphy, the Chairman of the board of directors, made a non-interest bearing loan of $15,000 to Acreage. In January 2020, Mr. Murphy made an additional non-interest bearing loan of $5,000 to Acreage. These amounts were subsequently repaid in March 2020.

 

In October 2020, Kevin Murphy made an interest bearing loan of $2,100 to the Company, bearing interest at 9.9% per annum. This amount was subsequently repaid in November 2020.

 

Michigan consulting agreement

 

Pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement by and between Kevin Michigan, LLC and High Street (the “Michigan Consulting Agreement”), High Street provides certain consulting services to Kevin Michigan, LLC, which includes, but is not limited to, services related to application support, provisioning center administration and operation, local and state regulatory filings, human resource matters, and marketing matters. The Michigan Consulting Agreement explicitly states that High Street is not able to direct or control the business of Kevin Michigan, LLC. Additionally, there are certain leases held by and between Kevin Michigan, LLC, as lessee and certain wholly owned subsidiaries of High Street, as lessors.

 

As of December 31, 2020, Kevin Michigan, LLC is not operational, and no consulting fees or rents has been paid to High Street or its wholly owned subsidiaries. Kevin Michigan, LLC is owned and controlled by our Chairman, Kevin Murphy.

 

F-45

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

3.55% Credit facility and collateral

 

On March 11, 2020, the Company closed $22,000 in borrowings pursuant to a loan transaction with the Lender. The maturity date is 366 days from the closing date of the loan transaction. The Company will pay monthly interest on the collateral in the form of 27 SVS through the maturity date. The Lender may put any unsold interest shares to the Company upon maturity at a price of $4.50 per share. Kevin Murphy, the Chairman of the board of directors, loaned $21,000 of the $22,000 borrowed by the Company to the Lender. The loan is secured by the non-U.S. intellectual property assets, a cannabis state license and 12,000 SVS shares of the Company. Refer to Note 10 for further discussion.

 

Pursuant to the Amended Arrangement, the monthly interest on the collateral payable to Kevin Murphy was modified to cash payments for the remaining duration of the term at an interest rate of 12% per annum, payable upon maturity. The remaining interest will continue to be paid monthly in the form of 2 Fixed Shares and 1 Floating Share through the maturity date.

 

15.            INCOME TAXES

 

The domestic and foreign components of loss before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

    Year Ended December 31,  
    2020     2019     2018  
Domestic   $ (376,905 )   $ (190,173 )   $ (30,725 )
Foreign     (453 )            
Loss before income taxes   $ (377,358 )   $ (190,173 )   $ (30,725 )

 

F-46

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

The provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

    Year Ended December 31,  
Income tax provision   2020     2019     2018  
Current taxes:                        
Federal   $ 10,375     $ 6,351     $ 1,117  
State     4,790       2,482       475  
Total current     15,165       8,833       1,592  
Deferred taxes:                        
Federal     (21,173 )     (2,625 )     (38 )
State     (11,232 )     (1,219 )     (18 )
Total deferred     (32,405 )     (3,844 )     (56 )
Total income tax provision (benefit)   $ (17,240 )   $ 4,989     $ 1,536  

 

F-47

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

The table below reconciles the expected statutory federal income tax to the actual income tax provision (benefit):

 

 

Year Ended

December 31, 2020

   

Year Ended

December 31, 2019

   

Year Ended

December 31, 2018

 
Tax provision reconciliation   $     %     $     %     $     %  
Computed expected federal income tax benefit   $ (79,245 )     21.0 %   $ (39,936 )     21.0 %   $ (6,452 )     21.0 %
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:                                                
State taxes     (35,715 )     9.5       (20,151 )     10.6       (3,022 )     9.8  
Nondeductible permanent items     76,128       (20.2 )     49,231       (25.9 )     4,483       (14.6 )
Pass-through entities & non-controlling interests     20,001       (5.3 )     13,465       (7.1 )     6,375       (20.7 )
Increase in valuation allowance     1,518       (0.4 )     1,816       (1.0 )     149       (0.5 )
Other     73             564       (0.2 )     3        
Actual income tax provision (benefit)   $ (17,240 )     4.6 %   $ 4,989       (2.6 )%   $ 1,536       (5.0 )%

 

The following table presents a reconciliation of gross unrecognized tax benefits:

 

  Year Ended December 31,  
Unrecognized tax benefits   2020     2019     2018  
Balance at beginning of period   $ 1,867     $ 1,394     $ 1,391  
Increase based on tax positions related to current period                  
Increase based on tax positions related to prior period     6,565       500       3  
Decrease based on tax positions related to prior period     (574 )            
Decrease related to settlements with taxing authorities     (139 )     (27 )      
Balance at end of period   $ 7,719     $ 1,867     $ 1,394  

 

Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded as components of the provision for income taxes. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had interest accrued of approximately $506 and $210, respectively. Accrued interest and penalties are included in Other current liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

 

F-48

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

The principal components of deferred taxes as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:

 

Deferred taxes   December 31, 2020     December 31, 2019  
Deferred tax assets:                
Net operating losses   $ 2,786     $ 1,295  
Other     697       670  
Total deferred tax assets     3,483       1,965  
Valuation allowance     (3,483 )     (1,965 )
Net deferred tax asset            
Deferred tax liabilities:                
Partnership basis difference     (34,673 )     (63,997 )
Net deferred tax liability     (34,673 )     (63,997 )
                 
Net deferred tax liabilities   $ (34,673 )   $ (63,997 )

 

The Company assesses available positive and negative evidence to estimate if it is more likely than not to use certain jurisdiction-based deferred tax assets including net operating loss carryovers. On the basis of this assessment, a valuation allowance was recorded during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

 

As of December 31, 2020, the Company has $4,596 of domestic federal net operating loss carryovers with no expiration date. As of December 31, 2020, the Company has various state net operating loss carryovers that expire at different times, the earliest of which is 2023.  The statute of limitations with respect to our federal returns remains open for tax years 2018 and forward.  For certain acquired subsidiaries, the federal statue remains open with respect to tax years 2014 and forward.

 

As the Company operates in the cannabis industry, it is subject to the limitations of IRC Section 280E, under which the Company is only allowed to deduct expenses directly related to sales of product. This results in permanent differences between ordinary and necessary business expenses deemed non-deductible under IRC Section 280E. Therefore, the effective tax rate can be highly variable and may not necessarily correlate with pre-tax income or loss.

 

In connection with the RTO transaction, the Company entered into a tax receivable agreement with certain members of HSCP, who represent a portion of the NCI, in which it agreed to pay 65% of any realized tax benefits upon conversion of HSCP units into Subordinate Voting Shares to such members. In addition, 20% of any realized tax benefits will be paid to certain HSCP members pursuant to the Company’s tax receivable bonus plan. The Company will retain the remaining 15% of the realized tax benefits.

 

On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was enacted in response to COVID-19 pandemic. Under ASC 740, the effects of changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period which the new legislation is enacted. The CARES Act made various tax law changes including among other things (i) increasing the limitation under Section 163(j) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “IRC”) for 2020 and 2019 to permit additional expensing of interest (ii) enacting a technical correction so that qualified improvement property can be immediately expensed under IRC Section 168(k), (iii) making modifications to the federal net operating loss rules including permitting federal net operating losses incurred in 2020, 2019, and 2018 to be carried back to the five preceding taxable years in order to generate a refund of previously paid income taxes and (iv) enhancing the recoverability of alternative minimum tax credits. Given the Company is subject to 280E, the CARES Act did not have an impact on the financial statements.

 

F-49

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)

 

16.            REPORTABLE SEGMENTS

 

The Company prepares its segment reporting on the same basis that its Chief Operating Decision Maker manages the business, and makes operating decisions. The Company operates under one operating segment, which is its only reportable segment: the production and sale of cannabis products. The Company’s measure of segment performance is net income, and derives its revenue primarily from the sale of cannabis products, as well as related management or consulting services which were not material in all periods presented. All of the Company’s operations are located in the United States.

 

17.            SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

Compass Neuroceuticals Litigation

 

In February 2021, a JAMS arbitration was initiated in Atlanta by Acreage Georgia LLC (“Acreage Georgia”) against its former consultant, Compass Neuroceuticals, Inc. (“Compass”), stemming from Compass’ breach of the consulting agreement entered into between the parties in June 2019, related to the preparation of an application for a Class 1 cultivation license in Georgia. Acreage Georgia is alleging damages, including lost profits, of approximately $9,000. Compass filed counterclaims for breach, also in the $9,000 range. A final arbitration hearing is currently scheduled for August 2021. The matter is in its early stages, therefore, it is too early to ascertain the materiality of any potential settlement or judgment, but the Company plans to defend itself vigorously in this matter.

 

Sale of Acreage Florida

 

On February 25, 2021, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell its ownership interests in Acreage Florida, Inc. (“Acreage Florida”) for an aggregate purchase price of $60,000. Acreage Florida is licensed to operate medical marijuana dispensaries, a processing facility and a cultivation facility in the state of Florida. The agreement also includes the sale of property in Sanderson, Florida. The aggregate purchase price includes an upfront cash payment of $5,000, an additional $20,000 in cash, $7,000 of the buyer’s common stock and $28,000 in promissory notes upon the closing of the transaction expected in the second quarter of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions, including the procurement of all necessary approvals for the transfer to the buyer of the Florida license for the operation of medical marijuana businesses.

 

3.55% Credit facility and collateral

 

On March 7, 2021, the Company extended the maturity date related to its $22,000 in borrowings pursuant to a loan transaction with IP Investment Company, LLC to March 31, 2021, which operates as cash collateral for the credit facility with an institutional lender.

 

On March 11, 2021, the Company accelerated the maturity date related to its $21,000 in borrowings pursuant to a loan transaction with an institutional investor to June 15, 2021, related to the loan described above with IP Investment Company, LLC. Refer to Note 10 for further discussion.

 

Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (SEDA)

 

On each of September 28, 2020 and January 25, 2021, the Company entered into letter agreements (the “Letter Agreements”) with the institutional investor extending the termination deadline of the SEDA to the earliest of November 30, 2020 and June 30, 2021, respectively, and the date that the Company has obtained both a receipt from the Ontario Securities Commission for a short-form final base shelf prospectus and a declaration from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission that its registration statement is effective, in each case qualifying an At-The-Market equity offering program. On March 11 2021, the SEDA termination deadline was further extended to April 15, 2022

 

F-50

 

 

PROSPECTUS

 

 

 

ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.

 

4,259,633 Class E Subordinate Voting Shares Underlying Warrants (exercisable at $4.00) Previously Issued

1,825,556 Class D Subordinate Voting Shares Underlying Warrants (exercisable at $4.00) Previously Issued

17,980 Class E Subordinate Voting Shares

7,705 Class D Subordinate Voting Shares

1,556,929 Class E Subordinate Voting Shares Underlying Warrants (exercisable at $3.15) Previously Issued

697,666 Class D Subordinate Voting Shares Underlying Warrants (exercisable at $3.01) Previously Issued

 

, 2021

 

II-1

 

 

PART II

 

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

 

ITEM 13- OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION

 

    Amount  
SEC Registration Fee   $ 4,164  
Legal Fees and Expenses*   $ 60,000  
Accounting Fees and Expenses*   $ 17,500  
Printing Expenses*   $ 15,000  
Miscellaneous Expenses*   $  
Total*   $ 96,664  

 

* Except for the SEC Registration Fee, all other amounts are estimates based on expenses incurred in connection with the filing of the registration statement. Expenses in connection with the offer and sale of securities are expected to increase depending on the securities offered.

 

ITEM 14- INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

 

Under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (the “BCBCA”) the Registrant may indemnify a director or officer, a former director or officer, or an individual who acts or acted as a director or officer of an affiliate of the Registrant, or at the Registrant’s request as a director or officer (or in a similar capacity) of another corporation or other legal entity, against all judgments, penalties or fines awarded or imposed in, or amounts paid in settlement of, any legal proceeding or investigative action, whether current, threatened, pending or completed, in which such individual or any of his or her heirs and personal or other legal representatives is or may be joined as a party, or is or may liable for in respect of a judgment, penalty or fine in, or expenses related to such legal proceeding or investigative action because of serving in such capacity, on condition that (i) the individual acted honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Registrant or such other corporation or legal entity, and (ii) in the case of such a proceeding or investigative action other than a civil proceeding, the individual had reasonable grounds for believing that his or her conduct was lawful. The Registrant may also indemnify a person described above in respect of all costs, charges and expenses, including legal and other fees, actually and reasonably incurred by such person in respect of such a legal proceeding or investigative action, providing such person complies with (i) and (ii) above. The Registrant may provide indemnification in respect of such costs, charges and expenses after the final disposition of such legal proceeding or investigative action, and may pay such costs, charges and expenses as they are incurred in advance of such final disposition, provided it obtains a written undertaking that such person will repay the amounts advanced if it is ultimately determined that the individual did not comply with (i) and (ii) above. Under the BCBCA, an individual described above is entitled to indemnification from the Registrant in respect of such costs, charges and expenses after the final disposition of such legal proceeding or investigative action as a matter of right if the individual has not been reimbursed for such costs, charges and expenses and is wholly successful in the outcome of such legal proceeding or investigative action, or is substantially successful on the merits thereof, providing such individual complies with (i) and (ii) above. On application of the Registrant or an individual described above, the Supreme Court of British Columbia may order the Registrant to indemnify a person described above in respect of any liability incurred by such person in respect of such a legal proceeding or investigative action, and to pay some or all of the expenses incurred by such individual in respect of such legal proceeding or investigative action.

 

In accordance with the BCBCA, the Articles of the Registrant provide that the Registrant must indemnify a person named above, and such person’s heirs and legal personal representatives, against all judgments, penalties or fines awarded or imposed in, or amounts paid in settlement of, any legal proceeding or investigative action, whether current, threatened or completed, which such individual or any of his or her heirs and legal personal representatives is or may be joined as a party, or is or may be liable for in respect of a judgment, penalty or fine in, or costs, charges and expenses, including legal and other fees relating to such legal proceeding or investigative action, because of that person having been a director or officer of the Registrant, provided that (i) the individual acted honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Registrant; and (ii) in the case of such a legal proceeding or investigative action other than a civil proceeding, the person had reasonable grounds for believing that his or her conduct was lawful.

 

A policy of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance is maintained by the Registrant which insures directors and officers for losses as a result of claims against the directors and officers of the Registrant in their capacity as directors and officers and also reimburses the Registrant for payments made pursuant to the indemnity provisions under the Articles of the Registrant and the BCBCA.

 

II-2

 

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, the registrant has been informed that in the opinion of the Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.

 

II-3

 

 

ITEM 15- RECENT SALE OF UNREGISTERED Securities

 

February 2020 Offering

 

On February 10, 2020, we closed an offering made pursuant to an agency agreement dated February 10, 2020 between us and Canaccord Genuity Corp. (the “February 2020 Offering”). The February 2020 Offering consisted of (i) 6,085,192 special warrants (the “Special Warrants”) and (ii) up to 4,056,795 units issuable upon the exercise of an option granted to the lead purchaser (“Additional Units”). The Special Warrants were automatically converted into units (“Initial Units”) each comprised of one SVS and one SVS purchase warrant (each, an “Initial Warrant”). Each Additional Unit is comprised of one SVS and one SVS purchase warrant.

 

In connection with the Amended Arrangement, we and the Warrant Agent entered into the Supplemental Indenture to amend the Warrant Indenture. In accordance with the Supplemental Indenture, each outstanding Warrant at the Amendment Time, of which there were 6,085,192, was exchanged for: (i) 0.7 of a Fixed Warrant; and (ii) 0.3 of a Floating Warrant. Upon completion of the Amended Arrangement, there were 4,259,633 Fixed Warrants and 1,825,556 Floating Warrants outstanding, each having an exercise price of $4.00.

 

Convertible Debenture

 

Effective May 29, 2020, we entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with YA, II PN, Ltd. (“Yorkville”) and each of the investors listed on the Schedule of Buyers attached thereto. The Securities Purchase Agreement provided for the offer and sale of a $11,000,000 principal amount convertible debenture (the “Convertible Debenture”). The Convertible Debenture bore interest at 15% per annum and was secured by our medical cannabis dispensaries in Connecticut. The Convertible Debenture was convertible by Yorkville in whole or in part after September 30, 2020. Prior to September 30, 2020, Yorkville could convert only $550,000 of principal amount. The Convertible Debenture was convertible into SVS at a conversion price of $1.68 per share, subject to the conversion limitations described above. We had the right to redeem up to 95% of the principal amount on or prior to September 29, 2020 without penalty.

 

On September 4, 2020, Yorkville exercised its right to convert $550,000 of the principal amount into SVS at a conversion price of $1.68 per share and received 327,380 SVS. Subsequent to the Capital Reorganization, the SVS issued to Yorkville were exchanged for 229,166 Fixed Shares and 98,214 Floating Shares.

 

On September 29, 2020, we redeemed 95% of the principal amount of the Convertible Debenture.

 

Standby Equity Distribution Agreement

 

We agreed to issue to SAFMB 200,000 SVS as commitment shares in consideration for entering into the SEDA. Subsequent to the Capital Reorganization, the SVS issued to SAFMB were exchanged for 140,000 Fixed Shares and 60,000 Floating Shares (the “Commitment Shares”).

 

February Credit Agreement

 

On February 7, 2020, we entered into a credit agreement (the “February Credit Agreement”) through our subsidiary, HSCP CN Holdings ULC (the “Borrower”), by and among the Borrower, Acreage Finance Delaware, LLC (the “Guarantor”), and the institutional lender party thereto and its administrative agent.

 

The February Credit Agreement provides for a secured credit facility in the amount of up to $100.0 million, which may be drawn down on by the Borrower in three tranches, maturing on the date that is two years from the date the first tranche is drawn down on. The obligations under the February Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the Guarantor, and secured by a first priority lien (the “Security Interest”) over $50.0 million in cash deposited in a bank account by us (the “Restricted Account”).

 

In order to fund the Restricted Account, on March 6, 2020, our subsidiary, the IP Borrower entered into the Original Credit Agreement, which provided for a credit facility in the amount of up to $50.0 million (“Credit Facility”) to be available in two advances. The maturity date for the first advance of borrowings under the March Credit Agreement, subject to acceleration in certain instances, is 366 days from the closing date of the Credit Facility. All funds drawn under the Credit Facility are required to be deposited into the Restricted Account as security for repayment of funds borrowed and amounts owing pursuant to the February Credit Agreement.

 

On March 11, 2020, IP Borrower drew the first advance of $22.0 million (the “Borrowed Amount”) under the Original Credit Agreement and deposited the funds into the Restricted Account (the “Loan Transaction”). Kevin Murphy, our Chair and former Chief Executive Officer, loaned $21.0 million of the Borrowed Amount to the IP Lender in connection with the Loan Transaction.

 

Interest on the principal amount borrowed under the Credit Facility was to be satisfied by the IP Borrower delivering to the IP Lender 83,333 SVS per month (or 58,333 Fixed Shares and 24,999 Floating Shares), or 1,000,000 SVS (or 700,000 Fixed Shares and 300,000 Floating Shares) in the aggregate (the “Interest Shares”). We were advised that Mr. Murphy was not a member, an officer nor a director of IP Lender and that Mr. Murphy was entitled to receive, assuming full repayment of the Borrowed Amount at maturity, $23.1 million along with up to 304,001 SVS, forming part of the Interest Shares, which entitlement to Interest Shares he forfeited in accordance with the Amended Arrangement.

 

II-4

 

 

In connection with, and as a condition to the implementation of, the Amended Arrangement, the Original Credit Agreement was amended in accordance with the Credit Agreement Amendment. The Credit Agreement Amendment provides that: (i) with respect to the Murphy Amount, effective as of the Amendment Time, the Original Credit Agreement was amended to (a) remove any entitlement to “Interest Shares” (as defined in the Original Credit Agreement) in respect of this amount, (b) provide for an interest rate of 12% per annum payable in cash, (c) amend Section 9.3 of the Original Credit Agreement to amend the obligation of IP Borrower to cause us to sell up to 8,800,000 SVS to repay the amount outstanding such that the obligation was reduced to cause the issuance of up to 2,000,000 Fixed Shares, and (ii) with respect to $1.0 million of the principal amount advanced pursuant to the Original Credit Agreement, the lender is entitled to (a) 16,799 Fixed Shares and 7,199 Floating Shares, (b) upon maturity of the Original Credit Agreement, a return of $1.1 million and (c) otherwise be treated in accordance with the current terms of the Original Credit Agreement.

 

IP Lender was entitled to 23,999 SVS under the Original Credit Agreement, of which 12,000 SVS were issued to IP Lender prior to the Capital Reorganization. The 12,000 SVS issued to IP Lender prior to the Capital Reorganization were subsequently transferred to Pilgrim Foresight Fund, LLC (“Pilgrim”), an affiliate of IP Lender, pursuant to applicable securities laws. Subsequent to the Capital Reorganization, the SVS originally issued to IP Lender and currently held by Pilgrim were exchanged for 8,400 Fixed Shares and 3,600 Floating Shares. In accordance with the Credit Agreement Amendment, IP Lender received an additional 8,399 Fixed Shares and 3,599 Floating Shares, with such shares replacing the 11,999 SVS IP Lender was entitled to pursuant to the Original Credit Agreement. Upon the extension of the maturity of the portion of the Loan Transaction held by the IP Lender to March 31, 2021, we issued an additional 1,181 Fixed Shares and 506 Floating Shares to the IP Lender.

 

This Prospectus registers the resale of the 17,980 Fixed Shares and 7,705 Floating Shares received by Pilgrim in connection with the Loan Transaction (the “Loan Shares”). We will not receive any cash proceeds from the sale of the Loan Shares.

 

Warrants Issued in November 2020

 

On November 3, 2020, we announced that we had received initial commitments and funding from a syndicate of lenders for a first advance of $28.0 million pursuant to a senior secured term loan facility at an annual interest rate of 15% with a maturity of 48 months from closing.

 

In connection with the advance, we issued the lenders an aggregate of 1,556,929 November Fixed Warrants with each November Fixed Warrant exercisable for one Fixed Share and 697,666 November Floating Warrants with each November Floating Warrant exercisable for one Floating Share. The exercise price of each November Fixed Share Warrant is $3.15 and the exercise price of each November Floating Share Warrant is $3.01. The November Warrants are exercisable for a period of four years.

 

II-5

 

 

ITEM 16- EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

Other than contracts made in the ordinary course of business, the following are the material contracts and other material exhibits as of the date of this registration statement:

 

         
Exhibit
No.
Description of Document Schedule
Form
File Number Exhibit/Form   Filing Date   Filed or
Furnished
Herewith
2.1 Arrangement Agreement between Canopy Growth Corporation and Acreage Holdings Inc., dated April 18, 2019.† 6-K 000-56021 99.2   4/30/2019    
2.2 First Amendment to Arrangement Agreement between Canopy Growth Corporation and Acreage Holdings, Inc., dated May 15, 2019. 6-K 000-56021 99.2   6/20/2019    
2.3 Second Amendment to Arrangement Agreement between Canopy Growth Corporation and Acreage Holdings, Inc., dated September 23, 2020. † 8-K 000-56021 10.1   9/28/2020    
2.4 Agency Agreement, between Canaccord Genuity Corp. and Acreage Holdings, Inc., dated February 10, 2020. 8-K 000-56021 1.1   2/13/2020    
2.5 Proposal Agreement Between Canopy Growth Corporation and Acreage Holdings Inc. dated June 24, 2020 8-K 000-56021 2.1   6/30/2020    
3.1 Articles of Incorporation. 8-A 000-56071 3.1   9/23/2020    
4.1 Form of Indenture. S-3 333-249583 4.1   10/21/2020    
4.2 Credit Agreement dated February 7, 2020.** 8-K 000-56021 4.1   2/13/2020    
4.3 Special Warrant Indenture, between Acreage Holdings, Inc. and Odyssey Trust Company, dated February 10, 2020. 8-K 000-56021 4.2   2/13/2020    
4.4 Warrant Indenture, between Acreage Holdings, Inc. and Odyssey Trust Company, dated February 10, 2020. 8-K 000-56021 4.3   2/13/2020    
4.5 Credit Agreement,  by and among Acreage Finance Delaware, LLC, Acreage IP Holdings, LLC, Prime Wellness of Connecticut, LLC, D&B Wellness, LLC, Thames Valley Apothecary, LLC and IP Investment Company, LLC., dated March 11, 2020. 10-K 000-56021 4.5   5/29/2020    
4.6 Security Agreement, by and among Acreage IP Holdings, LLC and IP Investment Company, LLC, dated March 11, 2020. 10-K 000-56021 4.6   5/29/2020    
4.7 Guaranty, dated March 11, 2020, of Acreage IP Holdings, LLC to IP Investment Company, LLC. 10-K 000-56021 4.7   5/29/2020    

 

II-6

 

 

         
Exhibit
No.
Description of Document Schedule
Form
File Number Exhibit/Form   Filing Date   Filed or
Furnished
Herewith
4.8 Second Amending Agreement, effective March 11, 2020 to Credit Agreement originally dated February 7, 2020.** 10-K 000-56021 4.8   5/29/2020    
4.9 Debenture issued to Universal Hemp, LLC to 11065220, dated as of September 23, 2020 8-K 000-56021 10.2   9/28/2020    
4.10 Amendment to Credit Agreement by and among Acreage Finance Delaware, LLC, Acreage IP Holdings, LLC, Prime Wellness of Connecticut, LLC, D&B Wellness, LLC, Thames Valley Apothecary, LLC and IP Investment Company, LLC, dated as of September 23, 2020. 8-K 000-56021 10.3   9/28/2020    
4.11 Amendment to Warrant Indenture between Acreage Holdings, Inc. and Odyssey Trust Company, dated as of September 23, 2020. 8-K 000-56021 10.4   9/28/2020    
4.12 Loan Agreement, dated September 28, 2020.** 8-K 000-56021 10.1   9/30/20/20    
4.13 Loan Agreement among High Street Capital Partners, LLC, the Lenders who may become parties thereto and Acquiom Agency Services LLC, as administrative and collateral agent for the Lenders, dated October 30, 2020. 8-K 000-56021 10.1   11/4/2020    
4.14 Construction Loan and Security Agreement by and among In Grown Farms, LLC 2, for the benefit of Pelorus Fund, LLC and the Lender, dated November 25, 2020. 8-K 000-56021 10.1   12/2/2020    
4.15 Description of Securities. 10-K 000-56021 4.9   3/25/2020    
5.1 Opinion of DLA Piper (Canada) LLP. S-1           X
10.1 Acreage Holdings, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated September 23, 2020.+ S-1 333-252818 10.1   2/8/2021  
10.2 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement S-1 333-252818 10.2   2/8/2021  
10.3 Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement S-1 333-252818 10.3   2/8/2021  
10.4 Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Agreement, dated November 14, 2018. 40-F 000-56021 99.42   1/29/2019    
10.5 First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Agreement, dated November 14, 2018, dated May 10, 2019. 10-K 000-56021 10.6   5/29/2020    
10.6 Second Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Agreement, dated November 14, 2018, dated June 27, 2019. 10-K 000-56021 10.7   5/29/2020    

 

II-7

 

 

         
Exhibit
No.
Description of Document Schedule
Form
File Number Exhibit/Form   Filing Date   Filed or
Furnished
Herewith
10.7 Third Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Agreement, dated November 14, 2018, dated September 23, 2020. S-1 333-252818 10.7   2/8/2021  
10.8 Tax Receivables Agreement, by and among Acreage Holdings America, Inc., High Street Capital Partners, LLC and the members of the High Street Capital Partners, LLC, dated November 14, 2018. 40-F 000-56021 99.43   1/29/2019    
10.9 Coattail Agreement, between Acreage Holdings, Inc. and Odyssey Trust Fund, dated November 14, 2018. 40-F 000-56021 99.41   1/29/2019    
10.10 Support Agreement, between Acreage Holdings, Inc. and Acreage Holdings WC, Inc., dated November 14, 2018. 40-F 000-56021 99.44   1/29/2019    
10.11 Support Agreement, by and among Acreage Holdings, Inc., Acreage Holdings America, Inc. and High Street Capital Partners, dated November 14, 2018. 40-F 000-56021 99.45   1/29/2019    
10.14 Standby Equity Distribution Agreement, between Acreage Holdings, Inc. and SAFMB Concord LP, dated May 29, 2020. S-3 333-239332 10.15   6/22/2020    
10.15 Loan Agreement between High Street Capital Partners, LLC and ALBF Investments, LLC, dated June 15, 2020. S-3 333-239332 10.16   6/22/2020    
10.17 Form of Voting Support and Lock-Up Agreement. 8-K 000-56021 1.1   8/19/2020    
10.18 Second Amendment to the Arrangement Agreement between Acreage Holdings, Inc. and Canopy Growth Corporation, dated September 23, 2020.†† 8-K 000-56021 10.1   9/28/2020    
10.19 Debenture between Universal Hemp, LLC to 11065220 Canada Inc., dated September 23, 2020.†† 8-K 000-56021 10.2   9/28/2020    

 

II-8

 

 

         
Exhibit
No.
Description of Document Schedule
Form
File Number Exhibit/Form   Filing Date   Filed or
Furnished
Herewith
10.20 Letter amending the Standby Equity Distribution Agreement by and between the Institutional Investor and Acreage Holdings, Inc., dated September 28, 2020 8-K 000-56021 10.1   1/28/21    
10.21 Letter amending the Standby Equity Distribution Agreement by and between the Institutional Investor and Acreage Holdings, Inc., dated January 25, 2021 8-K 000-56021 10.2   1/28/21    
10.22 Separation Agreement between Tyson Macdonald and Acreage Holdings, Inc., effective March 9, 2020. S-1 333-252818 10.22   2/8/2021  
10.23 Stock Purchase Agreement by and among RWB Florida LLC, Red, White & Bloom Inc., High Street Capital Partners, LLC and Acreage Florida, Inc. dated February 24, 2021 10-K 000-56021 10.28   3/25/2021    
10.24 Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement by and among Acreage Finance Delaware, LLC, Acreage IP Holdings, LLC and IP Investment Company, LLC, originally dated as of March 11, 2020. 8-K 000-56021 10.1   3/11/2021    
10.25 Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement by and among Acreage Finance Delaware, LLC, Acreage IP Holdings, LLC and IP Investment Company, LLC, originally dated as of March 11, 2020. 8-K 000-56021 10.2   3/11/2021    
10.26 Letter amending the Standby Equity Distribution Agreement by and between the Institutional Investor and Acreage Holdings, Inc., dated March 11, 2021 10-K 000-56021 10.31   3/25/2021    
10.27 Third Amending Agreement, effective March 11, 2021, to Credit Agreement originally dated February 7, 2020** 10-K 000-56021 10.32   3/25/2021    
21.1 Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2020. 10-K 000-56021 21.1   3/25/2021    
23.1 Consent of Marcum LLP, the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of Acreage Holdings, Inc. S-1           X
23.2 Consent of DLA Piper (Canada) LLP (contained in Exhibit 5.1 hereto). S-1           X
24.1 Power of Attorney (contained in the signature page of the Form S-1 Registration Statement filed with the Commission on February 8, 2021). S-1           X

 

+ Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.

 

* Document has been furnished, is not deemed filed and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of the Registrant’s filings under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in any such filing.

 

**Portions of the exhibit have been redacted on the basis that the information redacted would likely cause competitive harm to the registrant if publicly disclosed.

 

† Certain schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit will be furnished supplementally to the SEC upon request.

 

†† Portions of these exhibits are redacted pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of Regulation S-K.

 

ITEM 17 – UNDERTAKINGS

 

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

 

(1)  To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

 

(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;

 

(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of this registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement.

 

(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in this registration statement or any material change to such information in this registration statement.

 

II-9

 

 

Provided, however, that Paragraphs (1)(i), (1)(ii) and (1)(iii) of this section do not apply if the registration statement is on Form S-1, Form S-3, Form SF-3 or Form S-3 and the information required to be included in a post-effective amendment by those paragraphs is contained in reports filed with or furnished to the Commission by the registrant pursuant to section 13 or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act that are incorporated by reference in the registration statement, or is contained in a form of prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) that is part of the registration statement.

 

(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

 

(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

 

(4) That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser:

 

If the registrant is subject to Rule 430C , each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A , shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.

 

(5) That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities, the undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:

 

(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;

 

(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;

 

(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and

 

(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.

 

II-10

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of New York, State of New York, on April 22, 2021.

 

  ACREAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
   
  By:

/s/ Steve Goertz

    Name: Steve Goertz
    Title: Chief Financial Officer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on April 22, 2021.

 

Signature   Title
     
 /s/ Peter Caldini   Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Peter Caldini    
     

/s/ Steve Goertz

  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Steve Goertz

   
     

*

  Director
Kevin Murphy    
     

*

  Director
John Boehner    
     

*

  Director
Douglas Maine    
     

*

  Director
Brian Mulroney    
     

*

  Director
William Van Faasen    
     

*

  Director
Katherine J. Bayne    

 

* By: /s/ James A. Doherty  
Name: James A. Doherty  
Title: Attorney-in-Fact  

 

S-1

 

 

Acreage (QX) (USOTC:ACRDF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Acreage (QX) Charts.
Acreage (QX) (USOTC:ACRDF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Acreage (QX) Charts.