UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
 |
Filed by the
Registrant |
 |
Filed by a
Party other than the Registrant |
Check the
appropriate box: |
 |
Preliminary
Proxy Statement |
 |
CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE
OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE
14a-6(e)(2)) |
 |
Definitive
Proxy Statement |
 |
Definitive
Additional Materials |
 |
Soliciting
Material Pursuant to ss.240.14a-12 |

Rockwell Automation, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of
Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
 |
No fee
required. |
 |
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11. |
|
(1) |
Title of each
class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
(2) |
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
(3) |
Per unit price
or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined): |
|
(4) |
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
(5) |
Total fee
paid: |
 |
Fee paid
previously with preliminary materials. |
 |
Check box
if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing. |
|
(1) |
Amount
Previously Paid: |
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule
or Registration Statement No.: |
|
(3) |
Filing
Party: |
|
(4) |
Date
Filed: |

BLAKE D. MORET
CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
December 14, 2021
“ROCKWELL RETURNED TO GROWTH THIS
YEAR, AS AUTOMATION OF ESSENTIAL MANUFACTURING PROCESSES HELPED THE
WORLD RECOVER.”
Dear Fellow Shareowners:
The initial challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated
Rockwell Automation’s transformation in 2020 and we made great
progress in building on and operationalizing changes in fiscal
2021. Across all three business segments, in sales and marketing,
and through our other functional areas, we have picked up the pace
to create a pure play industrial automation and information company
unlike any other.
Rockwell returned to growth this year, as automation of essential
manufacturing processes helped the world recover. We stepped up
investment in both internal development and acquisitions to expand
our value in new industries and applications. Additional
investments underscored our commitment to our people, who remain
the foundation of our success.
The outlook for 2022 is exciting, as high backlog, continued strong
orders, and very good execution give us confidence in our forecast.
Continued very low order cancellation rates and direct line of
sight to end customer projects validate the durability of this
demand, and continued supply chain challenges are prudently
embedded in even the top end of our guidance range.
Our mid- and long-term differentiation is strengthened by the
growing capabilities of our management team, important new product
releases showcased at our Automation Fair last month, and an
evolving partner eco-system that is recognized as the best in the
business.
The Rockwell Board has embraced this transformation, encouraging a
sense of urgency and relentless quest for finding new ways to win.
The evolution of our culture is modeled by the Board and seen
throughout our 24,500 worldwide employees, creating a shared
purpose that more rapidly integrates new talent with experienced
Rockwell employees. I’m proud of the way that new employees from
recent acquisitions such as Plex, Fiix, Kalypso, and ASEM are
having an influence that goes beyond their acquired businesses. I’m
also grateful for the way that the thousands of other employees who
have joined Rockwell in the last year are being welcomed by their
management and human resources teams, under conditions that remain
very difficult. As I meet with new hires, I’m impressed by the
diverse perspectives they bring and by their conviction that what
we do matters.
Our technology and people are helping to build a more resilient
economy through solutions that enable safe, secure remote operation
of manufacturing processes. We are unlocking new agility with
advanced material handling products and software that simulates and
optimizes new production. And we are helping industrial companies
grow more sustainably, by running existing processes more
efficiently and by helping renewable energy producers lower their
costs and increase their capacity. Our rock-solid automation
products and new sources of value have never been more in demand,
and nobody is better positioned to bring them together for even
more impact.
We’re working every day to do extraordinary things for our
customers. Thank you for your trust in and your ownership of
Rockwell Automation.
BLAKE D. MORET
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Back to
Contents
MEETING INFORMATION
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2022
5:30 p.m. CST
VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING
Attend the meeting online and vote at
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ROK2022
TO THE SHAREOWNERS OF ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC.
You are cordially invited to attend our 2022 Annual Meeting of
Shareowners on Tuesday, February 1, 2022, at 5:30 p.m. (Central
Standard Time). The meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of
shareowners conducted via live audio webcast for the following
purposes:
Item 1 - to elect as
directors the four nominees named in the accompanying proxy
statement;
Item 2 - to approve on
an advisory basis the compensation of our named executive
officers;
Item 3 - to approve the
selection by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors of
Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for fiscal year 2022;
and to transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting.
RECORD DATE
December 6, 2021
WHO MAY VOTE
You may vote if you were a shareowner of record at the close of
business on the December 6, 2021 record date.
IMPORTANT MEETING INFORMATION
You will find information about the business to be conducted at the
meeting in the attached proxy statement. Due to the continued
public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to support the
health and well-being of our shareowners, employees and
communities, this year’s annual meeting will be held online via a
live audio webcast. Shareowners will be able to listen to the
annual meeting live online, submit questions, and vote their shares
virtually. You can read about our performance in the accompanying
2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, we make available on
our Investor Relations website at
https://ir.rockwellautomation.com/investors a variety of
information for investors.
Your vote is important to us. Whether or not you plan to attend the
meeting, it is important that your shares are represented and
voted. We encourage you to vote before the meeting by returning
your proxy card or voting via the internet or by telephone. If you
decide to attend the meeting, you will still be able to vote online
during the meeting, even if you previously submitted your proxy. If
you plan to attend the meeting, please follow the instructions on
page 73 of this proxy statement for login instructions.
DISTRIBUTION
We are furnishing our proxy materials to our shareowners over the
internet using “Notice and Access” delivery. This method reduces
the environmental impact of our annual meeting. Certain shareowners
will receive a printed copy of our proxy materials.
By order of the Board of Directors,
REBECCA W. HOUSE
Secretary
December 14, 2021
HOW TO CAST YOUR VOTE:
You can vote by any of the following methods:
|
INTERNET
|
BY TELEPHONE
|
BY MAIL
|
ONLINE AT THE MEETING
|
(www.proxyvote.com) until
January 31, 2022
|
(1-800-690-6903) until
January 31, 2022
|
Complete, sign and return your proxy by mail by January 27,
2022
|
You may vote your shares
during the meeting by visiting our annual meeting website.
|
Note: The Board of Directors solicits votes by the execution and
prompt return of the accompanying proxy in the enclosed return
envelope or by use of the Company’s telephone or internet voting
procedures.
|
Back to
Contents
PROXY
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this
proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the
information that you should consider and you should read the entire
proxy statement carefully before voting. Page references are
supplied to help you find further information in this proxy
statement.
VOTING MATTERS
We are asking you to vote on the following proposals at the Annual
Meeting:
ITEM
|
BOARD RECOMMENDATION
|
PAGE
|
Item 1: Election as directors of the four nominees named in this
proxy statement
|
FOR each nominee
|
24
|
Item 2: Advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named
executive officers
|
FOR
|
34
|
Item 3: Vote to approve the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP
as our independent registered public accounting firm for
fiscal 2022
|
FOR
|
63
|
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
•
All directors and nominees are independent except our Chairman
•
Our Lead Independent Director’s responsibilities are outlined in a
Lead Independent Director Charter
•
Balanced director tenure with three directors having more than nine
years of service and five with less than six years of service
•
Director term limits and mandatory retirement age
•
Balanced director ages with three directors under age 60
•
Diverse Board, with three female directors and two African-American
directors
•
Highly engaged Board with only two directors having missed one of
the meetings of the Board or Committees on which they serve
•
Annual Board, Committee, individual director, and Lead Independent
Director evaluations and assessment of Board leadership
structure
•
By-laws provide for proxy access by shareowners
•
Code of Conduct for all employees and directors, with Board
oversight of Code of Conduct matters relating to senior officers
and directors
•
Stock ownership requirements for officers and directors
•
Anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies for officers and
directors
•
Ethics training annually for all employees and directors
•
Long-standing commitment to corporate responsibility and
sustainability
•
Active shareowner outreach and engagement
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 2
Back to
Contents
The following chart highlights Board composition and certain key
attributes of our director nominees and continuing directors on the
Board. Additional information about each director’s experience and
qualifications is set forth in their profiles.
|
WILLIAM P.
GIPSON
|
J. PHILLIP
HOLLOMAN
|
STEVEN R.
KALMANSON
|
JAMES P.
KEANE
|
BLAKE D.
MORET
|
PAM
MURPHY
|
DONALD R.
PARFET
|
LISA A.
PAYNE
|
THOMAS W.
ROSAMILIA
|
PATRICIA A.
WATSON
|
Committee
Membership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
Compensation and Talent Management
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
Board Composition and Corporate Governance
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Technology
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Other Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age
|
64
|
66
|
69
|
62
|
59
|
48
|
69
|
63
|
60
|
55
|
Tenure
|
1
|
8
|
10
|
10
|
5
|
2
|
13
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
Independent
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Diverse Gender or Ethnicity
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Other Public Company Boards
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
Term Expiring
|
2023
|
2024
|
2024
|
Nominee
|
Nominee
|
2023
|
2023
|
2024
|
Nominee
|
Nominee
|
Chair
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 3
Back to
Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
We seek sustained growth and performance through a business
strategy that depends on our executives for planning and execution.
We believe it is important to align the compensation of our leadership with this growth
and performance strategy through pay for performance, with
appropriate levels of risk that are aligned with shareowner
interests. We believe our shareowners support this philosophy based
on positive shareowner approval of our executive compensation
program.
We strive to align our compensation programs with best practices
that address shareowner interests as provided in the Compensation
Discussion & Analysis section. Our executive compensation
program includes:
Element
|
Form of Award
|
Program Components
|
Period
|
2021 Total Target Direct
Compensation Mix
|
|
|
CEO
|
Other NEOs
|
Base Salary
|
Cash
|
Competitive pay based on scope, experience, and performance
|
One year
|
 |
 |
|
|
Annual
Incentive (ICP)
|
Cash
|
Performance on four key financial goals with adjustment for company
performance against strategic goals and individual performance
|
One year
|
 |
 |
AT-RISK PAY
|
PERFORMANCE BASED
|
Long-Term Incentive (LTI)
|
Performance Shares (40%)
|
Realized value based on TSR performance relative to the S&P 500
Selected GICS (Capital Goods, Software and Services, and
Technology, Hardware, and Equipment)
|
Vest after three years
|
 |
 |
Stock Options (30%)
|
Realized value based on appreciation in stock price relative to
original grant price
|
Vest over three years in three equal annual installments
|
Time-based Restricted Stock (30%)
|
Realized value based on our stock price performance
|
Vest over three years in three equal annual installments
|
|
We have a long-standing and strong orientation toward pay for
performance in our executive compensation program. In response to
the evolving conditions and uncertainty the COVID-19 pandemic
presented, we implemented temporary cost reduction actions,
including reduction in executive compensation, that began in fiscal
2020 and ended during the first quarter of fiscal 2021. Reflecting
our pay-for-performance orientation, no adjustments were made to
fiscal 2020 performance targets or our zero annual incentive and
below target performance share payout.
Economic conditions stabilized in fiscal 2021, and the Company
benefited from the work done by all our employees to achieve strong
fiscal 2021 financial results. Again, in accordance with our
pay-for-performance orientation, we took actions in fiscal 2021 to
recognize these results. The actions taken in fiscal 2020 and 2021,
outlined below, applied consistently across all participants in
these programs:
Our compensation actions helped to minimize workforce reductions
and enabled us to make strategic investments that enhance value to
our customers across diverse industries and deliver value to our
shareowners through fast growth from areas of new value.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 4
Back to
Contents
PROXY
STATEMENT
2022 ANNUAL MEETING
This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy are furnished in
connection with the solicitation by our Board of Directors (our
Board) of proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting of Shareowners
of Rockwell Automation on February 1, 2022 (the Annual
Meeting) and at any adjournment of the Annual Meeting. We will
refer to the company in this proxy statement as “we,” “us,” “our,”
the “Company” or “Rockwell Automation.”
|
THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND FORM OF PROXY ARE BEING DISTRIBUTED OR
MADE AVAILABLE TO SHAREOWNERS BEGINNING ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 22,
2021.
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION OVERVIEW
We are a global leader in industrial automation and digital
transformation. We connect the imaginations of people with the
potential of technology to expand what is humanly possible, making
the world more productive and more sustainable. Our hardware and
software products, solutions and services are designed to meet our
customers’ needs to reduce total cost of ownership, maximize asset
utilization, improve time to market and reduce enterprise business
risk.
Our principal executive office is located at 1201 South Second
Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204, USA. Our telephone number is +1
(414) 382-2000, and our website is located at
https://www.rockwellautomation.com. Our common stock trades
on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol ROK.
|
THIS PROXY STATEMENT INCLUDES STATEMENTS RELATED TO THE EXPECTED
FUTURE RESULTS OF THE COMPANY AND ARE THEREFORE FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS. ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE
PROJECTIONS DUE TO A WIDE RANGE OF RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES,
INCLUDING THOSE THAT ARE LISTED IN OUR SEC FILINGS.
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 5
Back to
Contents
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR
LETTER
DONALD R. PARFET
LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR
“THE BOARD IS ACTIVELY ENGAGED WITH
THE COMPANY’S INITIATIVES THAT UNDERSCORE OUR COMMITMENT TO
MAINTAINING A STRONG AND INCLUSIVE CULTURE.”
Dear Fellow Shareowners:
On behalf of our Board, thank you for your investment in the
Company and the trust you place in us to oversee your interests in
its success. The Board is committed to independent oversight and
strong corporate governance to enhance the value of your investment
over the long term. As always, this year we worked closely with the
Company’s management team to guide its strategic priorities as it
addressed near-term challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic and
invested in opportunities that will drive the Company’s growth and
create long-term shareowner value. I am pleased to update you on
the Board’s priorities and actions over the past year.
Board Oversight of Company
Strategy and Risk
In addition to the Company’s outstanding work to manage through the
challenges brought on by the pandemic, this year was pivotal for
the Company’s continued strategic transformation. The Company
successfully operationalized its three new business segments that
align with the value we deliver to customers. This year was also
notable for the addition of new senior leaders who are adding
expertise and different perspectives to help deliver the Company’s
strategy. The Board was actively involved in their recruitment and
hiring, and we are committed to adding leaders who are not only
well-positioned to drive growth and value, but also share our
commitment to our strong culture, including a keen focus on
integrity, diversity, equity, and inclusion. In September we
announced the completion of the acquisition of Plex Systems, which
further accelerates growth in strategic areas of focus. The Board’s
conversations on this transaction, as well as the other
acquisitions this year, were part of our broader discussions at
Board meetings where directors engaged in meaningful dialogue about
the Company’s corporate strategy and key risks and opportunities.
Our directors diligently provide this oversight with a purposefully
curated mix of skills and experiences. As a Board we are aligned on
the Company’s strategic direction and committed to open
communication with the management team.
Board Oversight of Environmental,
Social and Governance Initiatives
The Company’s strategy incorporates and is informed by our
environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives. The
management team worked proactively with and received guidance from
the Board as it addressed not only traditional human capital
management issues but also novel issues presented by the pandemic.
The Board is actively engaged with the Company’s initiatives that
underscore our commitment to maintaining a strong and inclusive
culture. Directors were involved in the recruitment of our new
Chief Diversity, Equity and Inclusion officer, participated in
diversity and inclusion programs with our employees, and continued
our practice of meeting key talent across the organization. Our
involvement with the Company’s stakeholders does not stop with
employees. The Board reviews shareowner communications sent to its
attention and is informed about shareowner feedback provided during
the Company’s year-round investor engagements. We continue to use
shareowner input to inform our governance practices to ensure they
remain strong. I encourage you to review the Company’s annual
Sustainability Report, which provides additional information about
our Sustainability Strategy across ESG initiatives, which is
focused on creating a sustainable Company, sustainable communities,
and sustainable customers.
Again, thank you for your investment in the Company. It is my
privilege to serve as Lead Independent Director of the Board, and I
greatly value your continued support.
DONALD R. PARFET
Lead Independent Director
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 6
Back to
Contents
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND
GOVERNANCE
Sustainability is central to our mission to make the world more
productive and more sustainable, and to our promise of Expanding
Human Possibility. We have long understood that sustainability is a
key imperative for our business and our stakeholders and we
continuously adapt our sustainability approach to meet new
challenges and make a meaningful, lasting difference in the world.
Under the three sustainability pillars of Environmental, Social,
and Governance (ESG), we prioritize the topics we believe will
create the most value and help us deliver three outcomes:
Sustainable Customers, Sustainable Company, and Sustainable
Communities.
Rockwell Automation is uniquely positioned to have a positive
impact on the world because we help our customers to achieve their
own sustainability goals. We offer innovative ways to reduce waste,
increase operational and resource efficiency, and enable customers
to successfully navigate sustainable digital transformation. We
strive to operate our own business with maximum efficiency with a
focus on programs and initiatives to maximize resource efficiency
(energy, water, waste) to reduce demand and emissions. In 2010, we
set a goal to cut greenhouse gas emissions intensity 30%, from a
2008 baseline, by 2022. Through various resource efficiency
initiatives, in 2018 we met our goal four years early. In November
2020, we announced our goal to be carbon neutral by 2030 (scope 1
and 2 emissions). In 2021 we released our first Global Reporting
Initiative report and announced the creation of our new
sustainability team tasked with driving our holistic strategy for
all aspects of sustainability. We also plan to release our first
ever Task Force on Climate-Related Disclosures (TCFD) report by
late December.
We are committed to making a positive impact on the world by
investing in the communities where our employees live and work.
Programs and activities that build science, technology,
engineering, and math (STEM) skills are our key philanthropic
focus. We invest heavily in university and workforce training
programs that address shortages of skilled manufacturing talent
while providing access to family-supporting jobs. Every partnership
is designed to provide equitable access to people with diverse
backgrounds and experiences.
Our diverse workforce and inclusive culture are a competitive
advantage that improve our ability to recruit and retain top
talent, maximizing innovation, teamwork, and problem-solving to
accelerate business growth. In 2021 we increased investments to
promote diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) more broadly across
our organization and hired our first Chief Diversity, Equity and
Inclusion Officer. He leads the team responsible for designing and
operationalizing our holistic DEI strategy that reaches employees,
suppliers, and commercial and community partners. Our strategy
builds on over a decade of work, with newer initiatives focused on
including progress on strategic company goals, including DEI, in
our executive compensation program and formally training leaders to
manage and sponsor employees across difference. Our culture extends
to our responsible supply chain practices. Our suppliers and
distributors follow our Supplier and PartnerNetwork Codes of
Conduct and abide by social compliance standards to support human
rights, labor rights, security, and diversity and inclusion.
Integrity guides our every action as we inspire, enable and equip
our people to innovate, outperform our competitors, and deliver on
the needs of our customers. Our culture is focused on four tenets:
strengthening our commitment to and demonstration of integrity,
diversity, equity and inclusion, comparing ourselves to the best
alternatives, increased speed of decision making, and ensuring a
steady stream of fresh ideas, all in an effort to create an
inclusive environment where all employees can and want to do their
best work.
We believe the health and safety of our employees is integral to
operational excellence. We strive for zero workplace injuries and
illnesses and operate in a manner that recognizes safety as
fundamental to the employee experience. We demonstrate leadership
with our safety performance and have consistently reported
best-in-class recordable case rate measures.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 7
Back to
Contents
Our Governance pillar includes a focus on ethics and integrity,
cybersecurity, product quality and safety, enterprise risk
management, corporate governance and engaging our stakeholders. The
following provides an overview of certain of our corporate
governance practices and Board attributes:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
|
ALIGNMENT WITH SHAREOWNERS
|
 |
•
Plurality vote with director resignation policy for failure to
receive a majority of votes cast in uncontested director
elections
•
Lead Independent Director
•
All directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting
•
Generally directors do not stand for re-election after
age 72
|
|
 |
•
Annual equity grants align interests of directors and officers with
those of shareowners
•
Annual advisory approval of executive compensation by
shareowners
•
Stock ownership requirements for officers and directors
•
Active shareowner outreach and engagement
|
BOARD COMPOSITION
|
|
COMPENSATION
|
 |
•
Number of independent directors - 9
•
Diverse Board with different backgrounds, experiences and
expertise, as well as balanced mix of ages and tenure of
service
•
All Board members have experience with corporate governance
matters
•
Audit Committee has financial experts
•
Three female directors and two African-American directors
|
|
 |
•
No employment agreements with officers
•
Limited use of change of control agreements
•
Executive compensation is tied to performance – 67% of CEO pay and
62% of other NEO pay is performance-based
•
Anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies for directors and
officers
•
Recoupment policy and clawback agreements
|
BOARD PROCESSES
|
|
INTEGRITY AND COMPLIANCE
|
 |
•
Independent directors meet without management present
•
Annual Board and Committee self-assessments and individual director
and Lead Independent Director evaluations
•
Board orientation program
•
Guidelines on Corporate Governance approved by Board
•
Board plays active role in strategy, risk and ESG oversight
•
Full Board regularly reviews succession planning for CEO and senior
management
|
|
 |
•
Code of Conduct for employees, officers and directors
•
Supplier and PartnerNetwork Codes of Conduct
•
Board oversight of Code of Conduct matters relating to senior
officers and directors
•
Environmental, health and safety policies
•
Annual training on ethics is required for all employees and the
Board
•
Commitment to corporate responsibility and sustainability
•
Annual Sustainability Report
|
SHAREOWNER RIGHTS
|
|
OTHER
|
 |
•
Confidential voting policy
•
By-laws provide proxy access to shareowners
|
|
 |
•
Employees may vote their shares in Company-sponsored plans
•
An independent inspector tabulates shareowner votes for the Annual
Meeting
•
Disclosure Committee ensures timely and accurate disclosures in SEC
reports
•
No multiple voting rights, enhanced voting rights, voting
certificates, or non-voting shares
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 8
Back to
Contents
BOARD’S ROLE AND
RESPONSIBILITIES
The Board is responsible for overseeing the business and affairs of
the Company, including corporate governance, corporate
responsibility, business strategy, enterprise risk, business
performance, capital management, executive compensation, and human
capital management, including succession planning and development
of the executive management team. The Board is focused on helping
the Company achieve long-term value creation for its shareowners
and other stakeholders and maintaining the Company’s strong
commitment to integrity and ethical conduct in all of the Company’s
relationships and business transactions.
BOARD’S ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT
The Board provides oversight of management’s program of enterprise
risk management and reviews significant risks through both the
whole Board and its Committees. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended September 30, 2021 contains a detailed description
of the most significant enterprise risks that we face.

BOARD RESPONSIBILITY
The Board has primary responsibility for oversight of management’s
program of enterprise risk management for the Company.
The standing Committees of the Board address the risks related
to their respective areas of oversight. Our risk oversight is
aligned with the Board’s oversight of the Company’s strategies and
business plans. Thus, the Board ordinarily receives reports on the
risks implicated by the Company’s strategic decisions
concurrent with the deliberations leading to those decisions. The
full Board annually receives an update on the enterprise risk
management program and receives reports from management on
enterprise risks that are not specifically assigned to a
Committee.
In general, the Committees oversee the following risks:
|
|
|
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE
|
|
|
COMPENSATION AND TALENT
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
|
•
Responsible for reviewing the overall guidelines and policies that
govern our process for risk assessment and management
•
Provides oversight regarding financial risks
•
Receives regular reports on management policies and practices
relating to the Company’s financial statements and the
effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting
•
Receives regular reports from the Company’s independent auditors
and general auditor, as well as the Chief People and Legal Officer,
the Chief Compliance Officer, and the Ombuds, regarding legal and
compliance risks
|
|
|
•
Considers the risk implications of the incentives created by our
compensation programs
|
|
|
•
Oversees risk implications for our strategies and initiatives
relating to talent management
|
|
|
TECHNOLOGY
COMMITTEE
|
|
|
•
Oversees risks related to technology, including information and
product and service security
|
|
|
•
Conducts an annual review of the cybersecurity risks associated
with product and service security and secure development
environments, including a detailed review of management action
plans to address any audit findings relating to those risks
|
|
|
BOARD COMPOSITION AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
|
|
|
•
Oversees governance-related risks, including conflicts of interest,
director independence, Board and Committee structure and
performance, and Code of Conduct matters, including for senior
executives and directors
|
|
|
•
Oversees risk implications of policies and practices with respect
to corporate responsibility and culture, involving diversity,
equity and inclusion, safety and environmental protection and
sustainability
|

MANAGEMENT
RESPONSIBILITY
The responsibility for managing risk rests with executive
management. Management periodically reports to the Board regarding
the system that is used to assess, manage and monitor risks.
Management also reports to the Board on the risks it has assessed
to be the most significant, together with management’s plans to
mitigate those risks. Executive officers are assigned
responsibility for managing the risks deemed most
significant.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 9
Back to
Contents
BOARD’S ROLE IN MANAGEMENT SUCCESSION PLANNING
Our Board considers succession planning and development to be a
critical part of the Company’s long-term strategy. The Board
oversees CEO and senior management succession and development plans
and receives regular reports on employee engagement and retention
matters. The Board also takes an active role in the oversight of
overall talent management and has opportunities to engage with high
potential and emerging leaders and interact with and assess talent
throughout the organization. In particular, the Board Composition
and Corporate Governance Committee defines the skills, attributes
and other criteria to be used for succession plans and recruitment
for the CEO, and the Compensation and Talent Management Committee
oversees the succession and development of other senior management.
At least annually the full Board reviews senior management
succession and development plans with our CEO. With regard to CEO
succession planning, the Board regularly discusses potential CEO
candidates and their development and preparedness.
BOARD’S ROLE IN ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Corporate responsibility and sustainability are important
priorities for the Board and the Company. We have a strong
commitment to being an ethical and responsible company acting with
integrity and respect for each other, our communities and the
environment, which starts with the tone set by the Board. We adhere
to a Code of Conduct that applies to all employees and directors.
The Code of Conduct is based on principles and laws that guide the
decisions and actions of our employees.
The Board has primary responsibility for oversight of ESG matters,
including initiatives and programs related to sustainability,
corporate culture, and human capital management, with the standing
Committees supporting the Board by addressing these specific ESG
matters related to their respective areas of oversight. The Board
Composition and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and assesses
the Company’s policies and practices with respect to matters
affecting the Company’s culture and corporate responsibilities,
including environmental protection and sustainability. In relation
to human capital management in particular, the standing Committees
of the Board address the risks related to their respective areas of
oversight as outlined below.
BOARD OVERSIGHT OF HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
Area
|
|
Committee
|
Employee Wellness and Safety
|
•
We strive for zero workplace injuries and illnesses and operate in
a manner that recognizes safety as fundamental to the Company being
a great place to work.
•
We provide wellness and employee assistance programs to create a
workplace that is healthier and more productive.
|
•
Board Composition
and Corporate Governance
•
Compensation and Talent Management
|
CEO Succession Planning
|
•
We define the necessary skills and attributes of the CEO based on
the Company’s short and long-term strategy.
•
We regularly review CEO succession plans, including emergency CEO
succession.
|
•
Board Composition
and Corporate Governance
|
Ethics and Compliance
|
•
It is critical that all our employees let integrity guide every
action, constantly adhering to our Company’s Code of Conduct, so we
win the right way.
|
•
Board Composition and Corporate Governance
|
Culture
|
•
Culture is the foundation for our accelerated growth. At Rockwell,
we focus on four tenets of our culture: strengthening our
commitment to and demonstration of integrity, diversity, equity and
inclusion, comparing ourselves to the best alternatives, increased
speed of decision making, and ensuring a steady stream of fresh
ideas.
|
•
Board Composition and Corporate Governance
|
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
|
•
Our diverse and inclusive culture allows us to fully leverage
innovation and teamwork while delivering our commitments to
employees, customers and shareowners. We want to achieve a
workforce that reflects the communities where we live and work
globally.
|
•
Board Composition
and Corporate Governance
|
Talent/Workforce Management
|
•
The strategic management of talent means we hire and retain the
right talent, both for immediate needs and for meeting the
requirements of future business strategies. We foster this
management with programs that focus on:
•
Acquiring and retaining the best talent for our business needs
•
Talent development and training
•
Succession planning for senior management
|
•
Compensation and Talent Management
|
Employee Engagement
|
•
We want to be a place where everyone can and wants to do their best
work, which is why we measure employee engagement to remove
barriers, take rapid action, and improve employee experience.
|
•
Compensation and Talent Management
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 10
Back to
Contents
Area
|
|
Committee
|
Succession Planning for Senior Leaders
|
•
We focus on leadership development to ensure we are building the
necessary skills and talent for the future.
•
We actively manage the pipeline of key Company talent.
|
•
Compensation and Talent Management
|
Executive Compensation
|
Our executive compensation program is designed to
•
Motivate executives to create shareowner value
•
Attract and retain executive talent
•
Balance rewards based on performance from our financial results and
strategic goals with appropriate risk-taking
|
•
Compensation and Talent Management
|
Total Rewards - Broader Workforce
|
•
We are committed to providing competitive compensation, benefits,
and well-being programs to ensure we attract, motivate, and retain
talent across our global workforce.
|
•
Compensation and Talent Management
|
SHAREOWNER ENGAGEMENT
We believe that effective corporate governance should include
regular engagement with our shareowners. We are committed to
fostering strong relationships and an open dialogue with
shareowners through our ongoing program of outreach to shareowners
that is management-led and overseen by the Board. During the fall,
we invite our largest shareowners (excluding brokerage accounts) to
discuss our ESG practices and executive compensation program. We
also solicit input on topics of importance to our shareowners. We
conduct additional outreach with our largest shareowners during the
proxy season, with post-meeting follow-up as appropriate. In
addition, throughout the year our Investor Relations team along
with our CEO and CFO engage with our shareowners frequently.
In fall 2021, we invited shareowners representing approximately
half of our outstanding shares to calls and received feedback from
shareowners representing over 20% of our outstanding shares. Our
discussions focused on ESG initiatives, practices and trends,
including sustainability practices and opportunities, diversity,
equity and inclusion, and our executive compensation program. We
also received feedback on other topics important to our
shareowners.
Shareowner feedback from our outreach calls and any shareowner
letters that we receive are presented to and discussed with the
Board. The Board values the views of shareowners and considers
shareowner feedback in establishing and evaluating appropriate
policies and practices. Acting in line with shareowner feedback and
other input, in the past our Board proactively adopted a proxy
access by-law and enhanced disclosure of director skills, Board
processes, ESG matters, and the Audit Committee’s review of auditor
tenure and rotation in our proxy statement.
We believe that regular engagement with our shareowners helps to
strengthen our relationships with shareowners, helps us to better
understand shareowner views on our ESG practices and initiatives,
and provides us with insights into ESG and compensation topics and
trends.
COMMUNICATIONS TO THE BOARD
AND OMBUDS
Shareowners and other interested parties may send communications to
the Board, an individual director, the Lead Independent Director,
the non-management directors as a group, or a Board Committee at
the following address:
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
c/o Corporate Secretary
1201 South Second Street
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204, USA
Attn: Board of Directors
The Secretary will receive and process all communications before
forwarding them to the addressee. The Secretary will forward all
communications unless the Secretary determines that a communication
is a business solicitation or advertisement, or requests general
information about us.
In accordance with procedures approved by the Audit Committee,
concerns about accounting, internal controls or auditing matters
should be reported to the Ombuds as outlined in our Code of
Conduct, which is available on our website at
https://ir.rockwellautomation.com, select “Integrity &
Compliance” from the Corporate Governance dropdown menu, select the
“Integrity & Sustainability” tile, then the “Ethics &
Compliance” tile, and finally the “Rockwell Automation Code of
Conduct.” The Code of Conduct is also available in print to any
shareowner upon request. The Ombuds and Chief Compliance Officer
are required to report promptly to the Audit Committee all reports
of questionable accounting or auditing
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 11
Back to
Contents
matters that the Ombuds receives and all matters involving
allegations of a serious violation of the Code of Conduct by a
senior executive or director that the Chief Compliance Officer
receives. You may contact the Ombuds by addressing a letter to:
Ombuds
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
1201 South Second Street
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204, USA
You may also contact the Ombuds by telephone at
+1 (800) 552-3589 (US only) or +1 (414) 382-8484,
e-mail at ombudsman@ra.rockwell.com,
fax at +1 (414) 382-8485, or,
if you wish to remain anonymous, by going to:
https://rockwellautomationombudsman.alertline.com.
BOARD STRUCTURE
The Board takes a flexible approach to its leadership structure,
allowing it to adapt its structure depending on current
circumstances. The Board reviews its leadership structure at least
annually and will vary that structure in order to ensure effective
oversight and operations. The Board regularly evaluates whether to
separate or combine the roles of Chairman and CEO, and the
leadership structure depends on the current performance of the
Company and the experience and knowledge of the CEO. Currently, the
Board has combined the roles of Chairman and CEO and Mr. Moret
serves in both capacities. The Board believes that this structure
enhances overall Board effectiveness and interaction with
management, and provides the Company with strong, clear leadership
and strategic vision.
The Board believes that a unified leadership structure continues to
work well and is the right model for us to successfully execute our
strategy. In making this decision, the Board considers the
Company’s performance, operating and governance environment,
investor feedback, and the Board’s composition, functioning and
effectiveness. The Board believes that Mr. Moret has the skills,
experience and character to provide the Company with strong and
effective leadership, including:
•
long experience and deep knowledge of the Company, its customers
and its business operations and strategy,
•
deep industry knowledge and expertise, and
•
proven leadership skills with the vision necessary to lead the
Board and our Company.
The leadership structure of the Board and Company is further
strengthened by:
•
the leadership provided by our Lead Independent Director, with
defined roles and responsibilities set forth in a Lead Independent
Director Charter,
•
refreshment/election of new directors,
•
our process for evaluating Board and Committee structure, including
rotation of directors on Committees and Committee chair
positions,
•
the independence of all members of the Audit, Board Composition and
Corporate Governance, and Compensation and Talent Management
Committees,
•
our governance guidelines and practices,
•
our processes for evaluating the Board and management, and focus on
Board succession planning,
•
our effective shareowner engagement practices, and
•
our strong commitment to integrity and compliance with the highest
standards of legal and ethical conduct.
LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR
Our Guidelines on Corporate Governance require the appointment of a
Lead Independent Director in the event the Chairman is a management
director. The Board believes that this framework further
strengthens the leadership of the Company. In February 2016, the
Board elected Donald R. Parfet to serve as Lead Independent
Director. Mr. Parfet is an experienced director having served as a
senior executive of a pharmaceutical company and currently serving
as a director of two other public companies, including one of which
he serves as non-executive chairman. The Board adopted a separate
charter for the Lead Independent Director to formalize existing
practices and strengthen the role.
The Board’s independent oversight function is further enhanced
because the directors have complete access to management, the Board
and the Committees may retain their own advisors, and there is an
annual evaluation by the independent Compensation and Talent
Management Committee in collaboration with the Lead Independent
Director of our CEO’s performance against predetermined goals with
input from the other independent directors.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 12
Back to
Contents
The following chart sets forth the primary roles and
responsibilities of the Chairman and the Lead Independent Director.
We believe the Board’s leadership structure is appropriate for the
Company, providing effective independent oversight of management
and ensuring a highly independent, engaged and functioning
Board.
BLAKE D. MORET
|
|
DONALD R. PARFET
|
Chairman since 2018
|
|
Lead Independent Director since 2016
|
•
Provides strategic vision for the Company as Chairman and CEO
•
Establishes the agenda for Board meetings
•
Presides at meetings of the Board
•
Ensures provision of proper meeting materials and attendance of
executives and advisors for meetings of the Board
•
Consults with the Board Composition and Corporate Governance
Committee on matters of corporate governance
•
Consults with the Board Composition and Corporate Governance
Committee on Committee composition
•
Acts as Chairman of and presides at meetings of shareowners
•
Calls special meetings of the Board
•
Consults with the Board Composition and Corporate Governance
Committee on leadership structure of the Board
•
Does not serve on any Committees but attends all Committee
meetings
|
|
•
Works to ensure the Board functions with appropriate independence
from management
•
Acts as a key liaison between the Chairman and the independent
directors
•
Communicates Board feedback to the Chairman after each Board
meeting
•
Collaborates with the Chairman to develop Board meeting agendas
•
Collaborates with the Compensation and Talent Management Committee
to conduct the annual evaluation of the performance of the Chairman
and CEO
•
Collaborates with the Chairman and Board Composition and Corporate
Governance Committee on matters related to Board effectiveness
•
Presides at independent director sessions of the Board
•
Presides at Board meetings if the Chairman is not present
•
Calls meetings of the independent directors when necessary
•
Does not serve on any Committees but attends all Committee
meetings
|
BOARD MEETINGS AND
COMMITTEES
Our business is managed under the direction of the Board. The Board
has established four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the
Board Composition and Corporate Governance Committee, the
Compensation and Talent Management Committee and the Technology
Committee, whose principal functions are briefly described below.
Each Committee has a written charter that sets forth the duties and
responsibilities of the Committee. Current copies of the Committee
charters are available on our website at
https://ir.rockwellautomation.com/corporate-governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.
The Committees review and assess the adequacy of their charters
each year and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for
approval. During fiscal 2021, the Board Composition and Corporate
Governance Committee and the Compensation and Talent Management
Committee amended their charters to clarify and define their
respective responsibilities with respect to oversight of corporate
responsibility, diversity, equity and inclusion and talent
management and employee engagement. The Audit Committee and
Technology Committee did not make any changes to their charters
during fiscal 2021.
In fiscal 2021, the Board held nine meetings and on four occasions
acted by written consent in lieu of a meeting. Eight of the
directors attended 100% of the meetings and three directors did not
attend one of the meetings of the Board or the Committees on which
they served. All directors attended 89% or more of the total number
of meetings. Under our Guidelines on Corporate Governance,
directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareowners.
All directors attended the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareowners.
INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR
SESSIONS
The independent directors meet in executive session without any
officer or member of management present in conjunction with regular
meetings of the Board and each Committee. The Lead Independent
Director presides over independent director sessions of the Board,
and Committee Chairs preside over executive sessions of their
respective Committees. Following each executive session, the Lead
Independent Director and the Committee Chairs discuss with the
Chairman and CEO appropriate matters from these sessions.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 13
Back to
Contents
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
Audit Committee
|
Current Members
|
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
|
James P. Keane (Chair)
William P. Gipson
Pam Murphy
Patricia A. Watson
Number of Meetings in Fiscal 2021: Seven
|
•
Assist the Board in overseeing and monitoring the integrity of our
financial reporting processes, our internal control and disclosure
control systems, the integrity and audits of our financial
statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements,
the qualifications and independence of our independent registered
public accounting firm, and the performance of our internal audit
function and independent registered public accounting firm.
•
Appoint our independent registered public accounting firm, subject
to shareowner approval.
•
Approve all audit and audit-related fees and services and permitted
non-audit fees and services of our independent registered public
accounting firm.
•
Review with our independent registered public accounting firm and
management our annual audited and quarterly financial
statements.
•
Discuss with management our quarterly earnings releases.
•
Review with our independent registered public accounting firm and
management the quality and adequacy of our internal controls.
•
Discuss with management our financial risk assessment and risk
management policies.
|
INDEPENDENCE:
|
•
All members of the Audit Committee meet the independence and
financial literacy standards and requirements of the NYSE and the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Board has determined
that Mr. Keane and Ms. Murphy qualify as “audit committee financial
experts” as defined by the SEC.
|
|
Board Composition and Corporate Governance Committee
|
Current Members
|
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
|
Steven R. Kalmanson (Chair)
J. Phillip Holloman
James P. Keane
Lisa A. Payne
Number of Meetings in Fiscal 2021: Five
|
•
Consider and recommend to the Board qualified candidates for
election as directors of the Company.
•
Review leadership structure of the Board.
•
Consider matters of corporate governance and review adequacy of our
Guidelines on Corporate Governance.
•
Administer the Company’s related person transactions policy.
•
Annually assess and report to the Board on the performance of the
Board as a whole and of the individual directors.
•
Recommend to the Board the members of the Committees of the Board
and the director to serve as Lead Independent Director.
•
Conduct an annual review of director compensation and recommend to
the Board any changes. See “Director Compensation” below.
•
Define skills and attributes used in the evaluation for CEO
succession planning and recruitment and review the criteria with
the Board in the context of the Company’s strategy and needs.
•
Review the application of the Company’s Code of Conduct to the
Company’s senior executive officers and directors, address any
misconduct or matters involving a senior executive or director, and
report and make recommendations to the Board as to any such matters
as appropriate.
•
Review and assess the Company’s policies and practices with respect
to matters affecting our corporate responsibilities, including
diversity, equity and inclusion, Company culture, environmental
protection and sustainability, employee health and safety,
community relations, and corporate social responsibility.
|
INDEPENDENCE:
|
•
All members of the Board Composition and Corporate Governance
Committee are independent directors as defined by the NYSE.
|
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 14
Back to
Contents
Compensation and Talent Management Committee
|
Current Members
|
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
|
Lisa A. Payne (Chair)
J. Phillip Holloman
Steven R. Kalmanson
Thomas W. Rosamilia
Number of Meetings in Fiscal 2021: Six, plus three actions taken by written
consent
|
•
Evaluate the performance of our senior executives, including the
CEO.
•
Make recommendations to the Board with respect to compensation
plans.
•
Review and approve salaries, incentive compensation, equity awards
and other compensation of officers.
•
Review the salary plan for the CEO and other executives who
directly report to the CEO.
•
Oversee succession and development plans for senior management.
•
Review and discuss with the Company’s management strategies and
initiatives relating to talent management and employee
engagement.
•
Review and approve corporate goals and objectives.
•
Oversee the design and competitiveness of the Company’s overall
compensation programs and benefits.
•
Oversee the work and independence of any advisor retained by the
Compensation and Talent Management Committee.
|
INDEPENDENCE:
|
•
All members of the Compensation and Talent Management Committee are
independent directors as defined by the NYSE and are not eligible
to participate in any of our compensation plans or programs, except
our 2020 Long-Term Incentives Plan for annual retainer fees in the
form of equity awards and Directors Deferred Compensation Plan.
|
ROLE OF INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANTS:
|
•
The Compensation and Talent Management Committee has engaged Willis
Towers Watson, an executive compensation consulting firm that is
directly accountable to the Compensation and Talent Management
Committee, to provide advice on compensation trends and market
information to assist the Compensation and Talent Management
Committee in fulfilling its duties, including the following
responsibilities: review executive compensation and advise of
changes to be considered to improve effectiveness consistent with
our compensation philosophy; provide market data and
recommendations on CEO and other executive compensation; review
materials and attend Compensation and Talent Management Committee
meetings; and advise the Compensation and Talent Management
Committee on best practices for governance of executive
compensation as well as areas of possible concern or risk in the
Company’s programs. The Compensation and Talent Management
Committee annually reviews the performance and independence of the
consultants.
•
Willis Towers Watson serves as the Compensation and Talent
Management Committee’s advisor and is directly engaged by and is
accountable to the Compensation and Talent Management Committee,
and has not been engaged by management for other services, except
as described in this section. During fiscal 2021, Willis Towers
Watson was paid approximately $209,000 for executive compensation
advice, other services to the Compensation and Talent Management
Committee, director compensation advice and other services to the
Board Composition and Corporate Governance Committee. During fiscal
2021, Willis Towers Watson was also paid approximately $3,288,000,
of which $2,912,000 or 89% was for core actuarial services and
$376,000 or 11% was for other human resources services to the
Company and its benefit plans. The engagements for these other
services were recommended by management and approved by the
Compensation and Talent Management Committee.
In fiscal 2021, the Compensation and Talent Management Committee
utilized Willis Towers Watson to serve as its independent
compensation consultant after assessing the firm’s independence,
taking into consideration the following factors, among others:
•
The Compensation and Talent Management Committee’s oversight of the
relationship between the Company and Willis Towers Watson mitigates
the possibility that management could misuse other engagements to
influence Willis Towers Watson’s compensation work for the
Compensation and Talent Management Committee.
•
Willis Towers Watson has adopted internal safeguards to ensure that
its executive compensation advice is independent and has provided
the Compensation and Talent Management Committee with a written
assessment of the independence of its advisory work to the
Compensation and Talent Management Committee for fiscal 2021.
•
The Compensation and Talent Management Committee retains ultimate
decision-making authority for all executive pay matters and
understands Willis Towers Watson’s role is simply that of
advisor.
•
There are no significant business or personal relationships between
Willis Towers Watson and any of our executives or members of the
Compensation and Talent Management Committee.
Based on this assessment, the Compensation and Talent Management
Committee has concluded that it is receiving objective and
independent advice from Willis Towers Watson and that its work for
the Company does not raise any conflict of interest.
The Compensation and Talent Management Committee intends to
continue to oversee all relationships between the Company and
Willis Towers Watson to ensure that the Compensation and Talent
Management Committee continues to receive objective compensation
advice from Willis Towers Watson. In addition, the Compensation and
Talent Management Committee will review and approve the type and
scope of all services provided by Willis Towers Watson and the
amounts paid by the Company for such services.
|
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 15
Back to
Contents
Technology Committee
|
Current Members
|
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
|
Thomas W. Rosamilia (Chair)
William P. Gipson
Pam Murphy
Patricia A. Watson
Number of Meetings in Fiscal 2021: Four
|
•
Review and assess our innovation and technology matters, including
investments in technology, research and development, technology
initiatives, and our strategy and approach to technical talent
management.
•
Assist in oversight of risks associated with technology, including
information security, product and service safety and security, and
technical talent.
•
Review and assess practices with respect to customer needs for
technology development and messaging and marketing of our
technologies.
•
Periodically review our intellectual property strategy and
activities.
|
INDEPENDENCE:
|
•
All members of the Technology Committee are independent directors
as defined by the NYSE.
|
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 16
Back to
Contents
BOARD PROCESSES
BOARD AND COMMITTEE EVALUATIONS
The Board and its Committees conduct self-assessments annually at
their October/November meetings. The Board Composition and
Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews the style and
manner in which the evaluations will be conducted to ensure they
are effective for the Company and its strategy. The Board will vary
its evaluation approach based on the needs of the Board at any
given time and change it from time to time to enable different
forms of feedback. The Board uses different approaches for its
evaluations, including written questionnaires and in-depth
confidential interviews with individual directors conducted by the
Chair of the Board Composition and Corporate Governance Committee,
and meetings with certain members of management, and has explored
the use of a third-party facilitator. The Chair of the Board
Composition and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the Board
evaluation process, including the evaluation of the Lead
Independent Director. The current annual evaluation process is
summarized below.
| ACTION |
| DESCRIPTION |
|
|

APPROACH
|
The Board Composition and Corporate Governance Committee annually
reviews the manner in which it conducts evaluations. |
 |
|

PREPARATION
|
Each director receives materials for the annual evaluation of (i)
the Board’s performance and contributions of individual directors,
(ii) his or her Committees, and (iii) Lead Independent Director
performance. The materials include the Board and Committee
self-assessment process, Committee charters, suggested topics for
discussion, and information on attendance, Committee composition
and meeting agenda items. |
 |
|

PERFORMANCE
REVIEW
|
Each director is asked to consider a list of questions to assist
with the evaluation of the Board, individual directors and
Committees, including topics such as Board composition, Committee
composition and effectiveness, the conduct and effectiveness of
meetings, quality of discussions, roles and responsibilities,
quality and quantity of information provided, opportunities for
improvement and follow through on recommendations. As part of this
process, directors are asked to provide feedback on the performance
of other directors, including the Lead Independent Director. For
fiscal 2021, the Chair of the Board Composition and Corporate
Governance Committee held meetings with each director and certain
senior executives to obtain their feedback. |
 |
|

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REVIEW
|
The Board reviews its Guidelines on Corporate Governance, including
the guidelines for determining director independence, and revises
them as appropriate to promote effective board functioning, and
receives reports from the Chief People and Legal Officer on recent
governance developments, regulations and best practices. Each
Committee reviews its charter and confirms compliance with all
charter requirements. In addition, the Board Composition and
Corporate Governance Committee reviews the Board Membership
Criteria. |
 |
|

EVALUATION REPORT
|
The Chair of the Board Composition and Corporate Governance
Committee prepares a written report summarizing the annual
evaluation of Board performance, including findings and
recommendations. The report is reviewed and discussed by the Board
Composition and Corporate Governance Committee and then distributed
to the Board for consideration and discussion at the next Board
meeting. The Committee Chairs report to the Board on their
Committee evaluations, noting any actionable items. Past
evaluations have identified a wide range of topics for Board focus
such as strategy, Board communications, risk management,
acquisitions, and succession planning. |
 |

ACTIONABLE
ITEMS
|
The Board and Committees address areas of focus and any actionable
items throughout the year. |
 |
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 17
Back to
Contents
DIRECTOR EDUCATION
Our Board believes in continuous improvement of Board effectiveness
and functioning as well as individual skills and knowledge. All new
directors are required to participate in our director orientation
program to familiarize them with the Company’s business, strategic
plans, significant financial, accounting and risk management
issues, ethics and compliance programs, corporate governance
practices, sustainability strategy, principal officers, and
internal and independent auditors.
In addition to annual ethics training, we also provide directors
with regular presentations and memoranda on key business, ESG, and
other important topics intended to help directors stay current on
practices and emerging issues and in carrying out their
responsibilities, with focus last year on compliance matters,
corporate culture and sustainability. Directors from time-to-time
tour Company facilities and attend our trade shows and investor
events. In addition, directors receive presentations and reports
from our auditors, consultants and other outside advisors and
participate in outside continuing education programs to increase
their knowledge and understanding of the duties and
responsibilities of directors and the Company, regulatory
developments, emerging trends, and best practices.
RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
The Board adopted a written policy regarding how it will review and
approve related person transactions (as defined below). The Board
Composition and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for
administering this policy. The policy is available on our website
at
https://ir.rockwellautomation.com/corporate-governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.
The policy defines a related person transaction as any transaction
in which the Company is or will be a participant, in which the
amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any Related Person
or any of their immediate family members has or will have a direct
or indirect material interest. Related Persons include directors,
director nominees, executive officers, and shareowners who own more
than 5% of the Company’s securities. The policy sets forth certain
transactions, arrangements and relationships not reportable under
SEC rules that do not constitute related person transactions.
Under this policy, each director, director nominee and executive
officer must report each proposed or existing transaction between
us and that individual or any of that individual’s immediate family
members to our Chief People and Legal Officer. Our Chief People and
Legal Officer will assess and determine whether any transaction
reported to her, or of which she learns, constitutes a related
person transaction. If our Chief People and Legal Officer
determines that a transaction constitutes a related person
transaction, she will refer it to the Board Composition and
Corporate Governance Committee. The Board Composition and Corporate
Governance Committee will approve or ratify a related person
transaction only if it determines that the transaction is in, or is
not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its
shareowners. In determining whether to approve or ratify a related
person transaction, the Board Composition and Corporate Governance
Committee will consider factors it deems appropriate,
including:
•
the fairness to the Company;
•
whether the terms of the transaction would be on the same basis if
a related person was not involved;
•
the business reasons for the Company to participate in the
transaction;
•
whether the transaction may involve a conflict of interest;
•
the nature and extent of the related person’s and our interest in
the transaction; and
•
the amount involved in the transaction.
There are no related person transactions to report in this proxy
statement.
Rebecca W. House, the Company’s Senior Vice President, Chief People
and Legal Officer and Secretary, is married to a partner in the law
firm of Foley & Lardner LLP (Foley). The Company has used Foley
to perform various legal services for many years, significantly
predating Ms. House joining the Company in January 2017. Ms.
House’s spouse does not have a material interest in Foley’s
relationship with the Company because he is not involved in
providing or supervising services that Foley performs for the
Company, he does not receive any direct compensation from the fees
the Company pays to Foley, and the fees paid by the Company to
Foley in the last fiscal year were less than one-half of one
percent of Foley’s annual revenues. Under the Company’s related
person transactions policy, the Board Composition and Corporate
Governance Committee reviewed the Company’s relationship and
transactions with Foley and concluded that they comply with the
policy and do not constitute related person transactions. The Board
Composition and Corporate Governance Committee also approved
additional guidelines that require the Company’s CFO to review and
pre-approve any recommendations to engage Foley for legal services.
The Company elected to voluntarily disclose its relationship with
Foley in this proxy statement.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 18
Back to
Contents
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS
You will find current copies of the following corporate governance
documents on our website at
https://ir.rockwellautomation.com/corporate-governance/governance-documents/default.aspx:
•
Board of Directors Guidelines on Corporate Governance
•
Audit Committee Charter
•
Compensation and Talent Management Committee Charter
•
Board Composition and Corporate Governance Committee Charter
•
Technology Committee Charter
•
Lead Independent Director Charter
•
Related Person Transactions Policy
•
Hiring Policy for Employees of Outside Auditor
•
Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy
•
Shareowner Communications to the Board and Ombudsman
•
Certificate of Incorporation
We will provide printed copies of any of these documents to any
shareowner upon written request to Rockwell Automation Shareowner
Relations, 1201 South Second Street, Milwaukee, WI 53204, USA.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 19
Back to
Contents
ELECTION OF
DIRECTORS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
INTRODUCTION
Our certificate of incorporation provides that the Board will
consist of three classes of directors serving staggered three-year
terms that are as nearly equal in number as possible. One class of
directors is elected each year with terms extending to the third
succeeding Annual Meeting after election.
The Board has nominated four directors for election at this Annual
Meeting. The Board has nominated all four of these current
directors, upon the recommendation of the Board Composition and
Corporate Governance Committee, for election as directors with
terms expiring at the 2025 Annual Meeting. Mr. Keane was reassigned from the
class of directors with terms expiring in 2023 to the class with
terms expiring in 2025 to better align director tenure across
director classes.
Proxies properly submitted will be voted at the meeting, unless
authority to do so is withheld, for the election of the
four nominees
specified below, subject to applicable NYSE regulations. If for any
reason any of these nominees is not a candidate when the election
occurs (which is not expected), proxies and shares properly
authorized to be voted will be voted at the meeting for the
election of a substitute nominee. Alternatively, the Board may
decrease the number of directors.
The Board has adopted Guidelines on Corporate Governance
that contain general principles regarding the responsibilities
and function of our Board and Board Committees. The Guidelines
on Corporate Governance set forth the Board’s governance
practices with respect to leadership structure, Board meetings
and access to senior management, director compensation,
director qualifications, Board performance, management
development and succession planning, director stock
ownership, and enterprise risk management. The Guidelines
on Corporate Governance are available on our website at
https://ir.rockwellautomation.com/corporate-governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Our Guidelines on Corporate Governance require that a
substantial majority of the members of the Board be
independent directors. For a director to be independent, the
Board must affirmatively determine that the director has no direct
or indirect material relationship with the Company. The Board has
established guidelines, which are contained in our Guidelines
on Corporate Governance, to assist it in determining director
independence in conformity with the NYSE listing requirements.
These guidelines are available on our website at
https://ir.rockwellautomation.com/corporate-governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.
After considering these guidelines and the independence criteria of
the NYSE, the Board has determined that none of the current
directors, other than Mr. Moret (who is a current employee of the
Company), have a material relationship with the Company and each of
the directors, other than Mr. Moret, is independent. There were no
transactions, relationships or arrangements that required review by
the Board for purposes of determining director independence in
fiscal 2021.
NOMINATION PROCESS
The Board Composition and Corporate Governance Committee is
responsible for screening potential director candidates and
recommending qualified candidates to the full Board.
The Committee will consider director candidates recommended by
shareowners. Shareowners can recommend director candidates by
writing to the Corporate Secretary at Rockwell Automation, 1201
South Second Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204, USA. The
recommendation must include the candidate’s name, biographical data
and qualifications and any other information required by the SEC to
be included in a proxy statement with respect to a director
nominee. Any shareowner recommendation must be accompanied by a
written statement from the candidate indicating his or her
willingness to serve if nominated and elected. The recommending
shareowner also must provide evidence of being a shareowner of
record of our common stock at that time.
In addition to recommending director candidates to the Committee,
shareowners may nominate candidates for election to the Board
directly at the Annual Meeting by following the procedures and
providing the information set forth in our by-laws. See
“Shareowner Proposals for 2023 Annual Meeting” set forth
later in this proxy statement. Eligible shareowners may also use
our proxy access by-law to nominate candidates for election to our
Board provided the shareowners and nominees satisfy specified
requirements.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 20
Back to
Contents
The Committee, the Chairman and CEO or other members of the Board
may identify a need to add new members to the Board or fill a
vacancy on the Board. In that case, the Committee will initiate a
search for qualified director candidates, seeking input from senior
management and Board members, and to the extent it deems it
appropriate, outside search firms. The Committee will evaluate
qualified candidates and then make its recommendation to the
Board.
DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS
In making its recommendations to the Board with respect to director
candidates, the Committee considers various criteria set forth in
our Board Membership Criteria (see Exhibit A to the Committee’s
Charter), including experience, professional background,
specialized expertise, diversity and concern for the best interests
of shareowners as a whole. In addition, directors must be of the
highest character and integrity, be free of conflicts of interest
with the Company, and have sufficient time available to devote to
the affairs of the Company. The Committee from time to time reviews
with the Board our Board Membership Criteria.
The Committee will evaluate properly submitted shareowner
recommendations under substantially the same criteria and in
substantially the same manner as other potential candidates.
We believe that our directors should possess the highest character
and integrity and be committed to working constructively with
others to oversee the management of the business and affairs of the
Company. Our Board Membership Criteria provide that our directors
should (i) have a variety of experience and backgrounds, (ii) have
high level managerial experience or be accustomed to dealing with
complex problems, and (iii) represent the balanced best interests
of all shareowners, considering the overall composition and needs
of the Board and factors such as diversity, age, and specialized
expertise in the areas of corporate governance, finance, industry,
international operations, technology and risk management. The Board
Membership Criteria attach importance to directors’ experience,
ability to collaborate, integrity, ability to provide constructive
and direct feedback, lack of bias, and independence. Our Board
seeks to maintain members with strong collective abilities that
allow it to fulfill its responsibilities.
BOARD SKILLS, QUALIFICATIONS, AND EXPERIENCE
The Board has determined that all of the Company’s directors are
financially literate and possess the skills, judgment, experience,
reputation, and commitment to make a constructive contribution to
the Board. In addition, there are seven distinct sets of skills or
experience described below that we believe should be represented on
our Board to enable the Board to effectively fulfill its governance
responsibilities and provide guidance to the management team on the
Company’s strategy and execution of that strategy. The Board
Composition and Corporate Governance Committee strives to ensure
that our directors have an appropriate balance of these
talents.
Skills and Experience
|
|
Relevance to Rockwell Automation’s Strategy
|
|
No. of
Directors
|
Public Company CEO or Executive
Leadership, including hands-on responsibility for
strategic and operational planning, financial reporting,
compliance, risk management, and talent management, and a track
record of success in delivering growth strategies. Specific
attributes include ability to manage complexity, ethical approach
to conducting business, ability to resolve conflict, and ability to
lead high-functioning teams.
|
|
Rockwell Automation is a large global public company with complex
organizational, operational, and business processes. Directors with
experience leading large companies provide unique insights on
strategy and operations needed to drive strong results and achieve
enterprise goals.
|
|
 |
Global Business,
including a track record of growing market share and revenue in
markets around the world; an understanding of how to drive growth
in both mature and emerging markets, as well as regulated and free
markets; and insight into the talent needs of diverse geographic
markets.
|
|
Rockwell Automation does business in more than 100 countries. Our
global presence is important to our competitive advantage.
Directors who understand global business opportunities and
challenges and global talent needs provide guidance on how to drive
growth in markets around the world.
|
|
 |
Financial/Accounting,
including an understanding of finance and financial reporting
processes, and awareness of strategies to ensure accurate and
compliant reporting and robust financial controls. Directors with a
financial/accounting background may meet regulatory requirements to
be deemed a “Financial Expert”.
|
|
Rockwell Automation’s business involves complex financial
transactions and reporting. Directors with a high level of
financial literacy assist in evaluating our financial position,
capital structure, financial strategy, and financial reporting.
|
|
 |
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 21
Back to
Contents
Skills and Experience
|
|
Relevance to Rockwell Automation’s Strategy
|
|
No. of
Directors
|
Industry/Operational/Manufacturing,
including experience in industrial automation and information,
knowledge of markets and vertical market segments, exposure to OT
and IT and familiarity with operational processes (discrete,
hybrid, continuous process), and experience in overseeing
manufacturing operations or in developing, marketing, and
delivering services/solutions to address manufacturing needs.
|
|
Experience in industrial automation and manufacturing industries is
key to providing guidance on our growth and performance strategy.
Directors with this type of experience provide insight on
marketplace dynamics and key performance indicators to drive our
strategic plan and business operations.
|
|
 |
Relevant Technology and
Innovation, including experience in leveraging software
technology to solve customer issues, proficiency in commercializing
disruptive innovations and developing innovative business models,
and knowledge of digitization, mobility, cybersecurity, data
management and analysis, and integrated software/hardware.
|
|
Rockwell Automation is committed to enabling the next generation of
smart manufacturing and The Connected Enterprise. As a company
focused on technology and innovation, we value directors with
technology experience and knowledge, who can provide important
insights on our innovation strategy and execution of that
strategy.
|
|
 |
Sales and Marketing,
including experience growing market share/revenue through
innovative marketing and effective selling, a history of building
brand awareness and equity, knowledge of how to enhance enterprise
reputation and image, and an understanding of the voice of the
customer and the power of differentiating a brand in a way that is
compelling to target customers.
|
|
Rockwell Automation seeks to grow market share and build brand
awareness. Directors with experience in marketing and selling
provide effective oversight of this aspect of our growth and
performance strategy.
|
|
 |
Risk and Governance
Oversight, including experience serving on other public
company boards and/or committees, a history of overseeing,
managing, and mitigating risks, including cybersecurity, regulatory
compliance, intellectual property, and customer management; and an
understanding of how to assess and develop strategies to address
ESG matters, including corporate culture, corporate responsibility
and social issues.
|
|
Rockwell Automation prioritizes corporate governance and
responsibility. In the ordinary course of business we face various
risks, including operating, regulatory compliance, information
security, financial risks, and customer management. An
understanding of these matters, and experience addressing them, is
important for oversight of enterprise risk management and risk
mitigation. Directors who have experience with ESG matters support
our goals to evolve our culture with employees who can and want to
do their best work and to contribute to the communities where we
live and work.
|
|
 |
BOARD REFRESHMENT, TENURE AND DIVERSITY
A continuing priority of the Board is ensuring the Board is
composed of directors who bring diverse perspective and viewpoints
and have a variety of skills, experiences and backgrounds to enable
the Board to effectively fulfill its governance responsibilities
and represent the long-term interests of shareowners. The Board is
mindful that director tenure is an important consideration in
evaluating Board composition.
The Board does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity
but recognizes the value of a diverse Board and thus has included
diversity as a factor that is taken into consideration in its Board
Membership Criteria. The Board believes that it is important that
its members reflect diverse viewpoints so that, as a group, the
Board includes a sufficient mix of perspectives to allow the Board
to best fulfill its responsibilities to shareowners.
The Board believes that tenure should be discussed and evaluated by
the Board from time to time and depends on the Board’s current
situation and the needs of the Company. The Board believes that it
contains an ideal balance of newer and longer-tenured directors, so
we get the benefit of both fresh perspectives and extensive
experience. Three directors have served at least nine years, while
five directors were added to the Board in the past six years. The
Board believes its current tenure mix is appropriate for the Board
at this time and recognizes the merits of a board with balanced
tenure. Our directors with longer service are highly valued for
their experience and Company-specific knowledge. They have a deep
understanding of our business, provide historical context as the
Board reviews and evaluates the Company’s strategy, and enhance
Board dynamics and the Board’s relationship with management.
The Board regularly reviews director succession and the mix of
Board composition, diversity and experience, especially when adding
a new member. As part of this process, the Board evaluates the
contributions and tenure of current Board members and compares them
to the skills that might benefit the Company in light
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 22
Back to
Contents
of emerging needs. The Board seeks people with a variety of
occupational and personal backgrounds to ensure that the Board
benefits from a range of perspectives and to enhance the diversity
of the Board in such areas as experience, geography, race, gender,
and ethnicity. The Board also conducts annual self-assessments and
director evaluations. The Board believes it is in the best position
to determine the appropriate length of service for a director and
overall board tenure, with its current mix providing for a highly
effective and functioning Board. In addition to director
refreshment, the Board considers refreshment of continuing
directors at the Board Committee level by regularly evaluating and
rotating Committee Chairs and members. In February 2020, the Board
updated its Guidelines on Corporate Governance to implement formal
term limits for directors in order to ensure proper Board
refreshment and alignment of director attributes and skills with
the Company’s evolving strategy. A non-management director will not
be nominated for re-election to the Board after he or she has
served on the Board for 15 years or, if earlier, attained age 72,
subject to limited exceptions for up to one additional three-year
term.
SHAREOWNER ALIGNMENT
Our Board believes its interests are aligned with shareowners, both
economically and in carrying out its responsibility of oversight of
the Company’s strategic priorities and the creation of shareowner
value.
Our director compensation program is designed to align director
compensation directly with the interests of shareowners by paying a
meaningful portion of director compensation in shares of our common
stock. To further align their interests with shareowners, directors
can defer cash fees to restricted stock units that are paid out in
shares. In addition, directors are subject to stock ownership
requirements. They are required to own shares of our common stock
equal in value to five times the portion of the annual retainer
payable in cash (with the cash retainer for fiscal 2021 at
$107,500) and may not sell any shares of our common stock until
their stock ownership requirements are met. None of our directors
receive compensation for their Board service from any source other
than the Company.
We seek to maintain a Board with experienced leaders who are
familiar with governance issues and compliance with the laws and
regulations applicable to our business. Our Board monitors
shareowner views and considers shareowner feedback and perspectives
in establishing and evaluating Company policies and practices.
SUMMARY
We have provided certain information about the capabilities,
experience and other qualifications of our directors in their
profiles. The Board considered these qualifications in particular
in concluding that each current director is qualified to serve as a
director of the Company. In addition, the Board has determined that
each director is financially literate and possesses the skills,
judgment, experience, reputation, and commitment to make a
constructive contribution to the Board.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 23
Back to
Contents
NOMINEES FOR ELECTIONS AS DIRECTORS WITH TERMS
EXPIRING IN 2025
James P. Keane
|

Age 62
Director since: 2011
Committees: Audit (Chair)
Board Composition and Corporate Governance
INDEPENDENT
|
Retired President and Chief Executive Officer, Vice Chair,
Steelcase Inc. (office furniture)
|
EXPERIENCE:
|
Mr. Keane served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Steelcase Inc. from March 2014 to October 2021. He has held several
leadership roles since joining Steelcase in 1997. He served as
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2001 through
2006. He was named President of the Steelcase Group in 2006, where
he had responsibility for the sales, marketing, and
product-development activities of certain brands–primarily in North
America. In 2011, he assumed leadership of the Steelcase brand
across the Americas and Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. From
November 2012 to April 2013, he served as Chief Operating Officer,
responsible for the design, engineering and development,
manufacturing, sales, and distribution of all brands in all
countries where Steelcase does business. From April 2013 to March
2014, Mr. Keane served as President and Chief Operating
Officer.
|
|
OTHER LEADERSHIP POSITIONS:
|
Mr. Keane has served as Vice Chair since October 2021 and as a
director since April 2013 of Steelcase and will serve in that role
until his retirement in January 2022. He also serves as a director
for the Business Roundtable since February 2020 and as a director
or trustee of a number of civic and charitable organizations.
|
QUALIFICATIONS:
|
As retired President, Chief Executive Officer and a current board
member of a global public company, Mr. Keane brings current
business experience and knowledge to the Board. Through his
executive roles at Steelcase, he has extensive leadership
experience and a comprehensive understanding of business
operations, processes, and strategy, as well as risk management,
sales, marketing, and product development. In addition, he has a
high level of financial literacy and accounting experience, having
served as CFO of Steelcase. His understanding of financial
statements, accounting principles, internal controls, and audit
committee functions provides the Board with expertise in addressing
the complex financial issues that the Company manages. Mr. Keane
received his Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from the
University of Illinois and holds a master’s degree in management
from the Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.
|
|
KEY QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
|
•
Industry/Operational/Manufacturing
•
Risk and Governance Oversight
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 24
Back to
Contents
Blake D. Moret
|
Age 59
Director since: 2016
Committees:
None
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
EXPERIENCE:
|
Mr. Moret became our President and Chief Executive Officer in July
2016, and Chairman of the Board in January 2018. He served as
Senior Vice President, Control Products and Solutions, from April
2011 until July 2016.
|
OTHER LEADERSHIP POSITIONS:
|
Mr. Moret has been a director of PTC, Inc. since July 2018, where
he serves on the Corporate Governance Committee. He also serves on
the Executive Committee of the National Association of
Manufacturers (NAM) and on the Board of FIRST Robotics and as a
director or member of a number of business, civic, and community
organizations.
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS:
|
As our Chairman and CEO, Mr. Moret has proven leadership skills and
deep knowledge of the Company and its business operations and
strategy. Mr. Moret is accelerating the Company strategy by
focusing on understanding customer needs and their best
opportunities for productivity, combining our technology and domain
expertise to deliver positive business outcomes, and simplifying
our customers’ experience. He began his career as a sales trainee
with the Company in 1985, serving in senior positions across the
organization, including marketing, solutions, services, product
groups, and international assignments in Europe and Canada. In his
previous role, he served as Senior Vice President, Control Products
and Solutions, one of the Company’s two previous business segments.
Mr. Moret contributes his risk and governance oversight skills
gained through his experience serving on a public company board. He
has a deep understanding of the Company’s values, culture, people,
technology, and customers. He understands how to drive change and
growth in a changing global economy. Mr. Moret brings valuable
insights to the Board regarding our operations, technology,
culture, industry trends, competitive positioning, and strategic
direction. Mr. Moret received his Bachelor of Science degree in
mechanical engineering from the Georgia Institute of
Technology.
|
|
KEY QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
•
Industry/Operational/Manufacturing
•
Relevant Technology and Innovation
|
•
Risk and Governance Oversight
|
Thomas W. Rosamilia
|
Age 60
Director since: 2016
Committees: Compensation and Talent Management
Technology (Chair)
INDEPENDENT
|
Senior Vice President, Cloud and Cognitive Software and Chairman,
IBM North America (technology)
|
EXPERIENCE:
|
Mr. Rosamilia is Senior Vice President, Cloud and Cognitive
Software and Chairman for IBM North America. In this role he
directs IBM’s product design and investment strategy, expert labs,
global software product development, marketing and field operations
across the company’s vast software portfolio. He joined IBM in 1983
as a software developer and has held a series of leadership
positions, including General Manager of IBM’s WebSphere software
division, General Manager of IBM Systems and Technology Group, Vice
President of IBM Corporate Strategy, Senior Vice President of IBM
Systems and Technology Group and IBM Integrated Supply Chain, and
most recently as Senior Vice President, IBM Systems. In November
2015, he was appointed Economic Advisor to the Governor of
Guangdong Province of the People’s Republic of China. Mr. Rosamilia
led the global IBM Systems business and acted as a local
representative of IBM Corporate Headquarters in Beijing, China from
2017 to 2018.
|
|
OTHER LEADERSHIP POSITIONS:
|
Mr. Rosamilia has served on the boards of several charitable and
business organizations.
|
QUALIFICATIONS:
|
Mr. Rosamilia brings a high level of technological, strategic, and
global business experience to the Board. Through his leadership
experience at IBM, he has a deep understanding of technology
development, operations, risk management, security, and strategy.
He led IBM’s semiconductor, servers, storage, and system software
business; all of IBM’s supply chain; and IBM’s Global Business
Partners organization. During that time, he oversaw the
transformation of IBM’s Systems & Technology Group business to
better address clients’ higher-value, data-driven IT requirements,
which included making major investments in strategic businesses and
initiatives while exiting businesses that were not aligned with
client demands. In 2013, Mr. Rosamilia helped to lead the creation
of the OpenPOWER Foundation, a collaboration around open server
product design and development. Mr. Rosamilia has also overseen the
divestiture of IBM’s global semiconductor manufacturing business
and the divestiture of IBM’s x86 server business. As General
Manager of IBM Systems & Technology Group’s System z and Power
Systems, he was responsible for all facets of both businesses,
including strategy, marketing, sales, operations, technology
development, and overall financial performance. Mr. Rosamilia
received his Bachelor of Science degree, with majors in computer
science and economics, from Cornell University. He also completed
the IBM Strategic Leadership Forum at Harvard Business School.
|
|
KEY QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
|
•
Industry/Operational/Manufacturing
|
•
Relevant Technology and Innovation
•
Risk and Governance Oversight
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 25
Back to
Contents
Patricia A. Watson
|
Age 55
Director since: 2017
Committees: Audit
Technology
INDEPENDENT
|
President, Cloud Collaboration, Intrado Corporation (global
provider of technology enabled services)
|
EXPERIENCE:
|
Ms. Watson has served as the President, Cloud Collaboration at
Intrado Corporation since September 2020 and previously held the
role of Co-President, Enterprise Collaboration upon joining the
company in January 2020. She is the former Senior Executive Vice
President and Chief Information Officer of Total System Services
(TSYS), a role she held from 2015 until 2019 when Global Payments,
Inc. acquired TSYS. Before joining TSYS, she served as Vice
President and Global Chief Information Officer for The Brink’s
Company. Previously Ms. Watson worked with Bank of America for more
than fourteen years in technology positions of increasing
responsibility and spent ten years in the United States Air Force
as executive staff officer, flight commander, and director of
operations.
|
|
OTHER LEADERSHIP POSITIONS:
|
Ms. Watson has been a director of USAA Federal Savings Bank since
September 2020, where she serves on the Member and Technology and
Nominating and Governance Committees. She also served as a director
for Texas Capital Bancshares from 2016 to 2020.
|
QUALIFICATIONS:
|
Ms. Watson brings extensive technology and executive experience to
the Board. She has strong strategic leadership, business, financial
oversight, and technical skills. As President of Intrado’s Cloud
Collaboration Ms. Watson is responsible for delivering Unified
Collaboration as a Service (Ucaas) for enterprise and mid-market
clients leveraging cloud-based technologies. She has experience
setting company enterprise technology strategy to enable future
global growth. Her background and expertise in information
technology and cybersecurity give her critical insights into new
technologies, business models, risk identification and management,
and talent and strategy. She has valuable experience and knowledge
in the areas of audit and control and compliance. She also brings
the benefits of her board experience at USAA Federal Savings Bank
and Texas Capital Bancshares. Ms. Watson holds a Bachelor of
Science degree in mathematics from St. Mary’s College at Notre Dame
and an M.B.A. from the University of Dayton.
|
|
KEY QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
|
|
•
Relevant Technology and Innovation
•
Risk and Governance Oversight
|
 |
ITEM 1: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE
“FOR” THE ELECTION AS DIRECTORS OF THE FOUR NOMINEES
DESCRIBED ABOVE.
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 26
Back to
Contents
J. Phillip Holloman
|
Age 66
Director since: 2013
Committees: Board Composition and Corporate Governance
Compensation and Talent Management
INDEPENDENT
|
Retired President and Chief Operating Officer, Cintas Corporation
(corporate identity uniforms and related business services)
|
EXPERIENCE:
|
Mr. Holloman served as President and Chief Operating Officer of
Cintas Corporation from 2008 to July 2018. He joined Cintas in 1996
and served in various positions, including Vice
President–Engineering/Construction from 1996 to 2000, Vice
President–Distribution/Production Planning from 2000 to 2003,
Executive Champion of Six Sigma Initiatives from 2003 to 2005, and
Senior Vice President–Global Supply Chain Management from 2005
until 2008.
|
OTHER LEADERSHIP POSITIONS:
|
Mr. Holloman has been a director of PulteGroup since November 2020
where he serves on the Audit and Finance & Investment
Committees. He joined the BlackRock Fixed Income Board of Directors
in June 2021 where he serves on the Audit Committee. He also serves
on the Board of Trustees for the University of Cincinnati, as Board
Chair for the Urban League of Greater Southwestern Ohio and as a
director or member of several educational and civic
organizations.
|
QUALIFICATIONS:
|
As the retired President and Chief Operating Officer of Cintas, Mr.
Holloman brings significant leadership and operational and
financial oversight experience to our Board. He has extensive
knowledge and experience in the areas of process improvement,
operations, sales and marketing, and management. During his tenure,
he led teams that built 37 new Cintas rental processing facilities
and standardized the utilization of automated processing equipment
systems. In that time he also led his functions’ succession
planning, improvement of diversity and inclusion practices, and the
creation of staff development plans, and served as executive
champion of the supplier diversity initiative. He also implemented
a process that reduced the time it took to achieve target operating
efficiency by 75 percent. In the areas of distribution and
production planning, Mr. Holloman and his team, using Six Sigma
methodologies, improved profit, service levels, and internal
customer satisfaction while reducing inventory levels. He also
participated in developing the compensation and benefits strategy
for the organization. Mr. Holloman’s leadership and operational
experience give him a comprehensive understanding of processes,
strategy, risk, and governance management, as well as how to drive
change and financial growth. Mr. Holloman received his Bachelor of
Science degree in Engineering from the University of
Cincinnati.
|
KEY QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
•
Industry/Operational/Manufacturing
•
Relevant Technology and Innovation
|
•
Risk and Governance Oversight
|
Steven R. Kalmanson
|
Age 69
Director since: 2011
Committees: Board Composition and Corporate Governance
(Chair)
Compensation and Talent Management
INDEPENDENT
|
Retired Executive Vice President, Kimberly-Clark Corporation
(consumer package goods)
|
EXPERIENCE:
|
Mr. Kalmanson joined Kimberly-Clark Corporation in 1977 and held
various marketing and business management positions within the
consumer products businesses. He was appointed President, Adult
Care in 1990; President, Child Care in 1992; President, Family Care
in 1994; Group President of the Consumer Tissue segment in 1996;
Group President-North Atlantic Personal Care in 2004; and Group
President-North Atlantic Consumer Products from 2005 until his
retirement as Executive Vice President in 2008. Mr. Kalmanson was
president and sole owner of Maxair, Inc., an aviation services
company, from 1988 to 2011.
|
QUALIFICATIONS:
|
Mr. Kalmanson brings extensive marketing, business and executive
management experience to the Board, having served in various senior
officer positions for a global public company. Throughout his
career, he successfully initiated and managed risk and change to
assist in the transformation of Kimberly-Clark from a pulp and
paper company to a globally-recognized consumer package goods
conglomerate marketing some of the most recognized brands in the
world. In addition to his U.S. experience, Mr. Kalmanson has
international management experience through his responsibilities
for Kimberly-Clark’s European and Canadian businesses and sales
organizations, global procurement and supply chain organizations,
and marketing research and services organizations. He successfully
innovated, restaged and grew Kimberly-Clark’s global consumer
brands and businesses. He has experience leading mergers and
acquisitions, organizational restructurings and facility closures,
and divestitures. He also has experience in sustainability through
his responsibilities for developing conservation plans and
strategies to reduce the environmental impact of manufacturing
activities. During his tenure, Mr. Kalmanson was also responsible
for developing and executing management recruitment, development
and succession plans for his business units. In addition, he owned
and operated his own aviation services business for over two
decades, which gives him insights into economic, operational,
regulatory, and other challenges faced by the Company. Mr.
Kalmanson was born and raised in Johannesburg, South Africa and
received his Bachelor degree in Commerce and holds an M.B.A. from
the University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
|
KEY QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
•
Industry/Operational/Manufacturing
|
•
Risk and Governance Oversight
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 27
Back to
Contents
Lisa A. Payne
|
Age 63
Director since: 2015
Committees: Compensation and Talent Management (Chair)
Board Composition and Corporate Governance
INDEPENDENT
|
Former Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, Taubman Centers,
Inc. (real estate investment trust)
|
EXPERIENCE:
|
Ms. Payne served as Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of
Taubman Centers, Inc. from 2005 to 2016. She joined Taubman in
1997, serving as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
and Administrative Officer until 2005. Before joining Taubman, she
was an investment banker with Goldman Sachs & Co. for ten
years. Ms. Payne also served as Chairman of the Board of Soave
Enterprises LLC and President of Soave Real Estate Group (property
management) from 2016 through March 2017.
|
OTHER LEADERSHIP POSITIONS:
|
Ms. Payne served as a director of Taubman from 1997 until March
2016. She has been a director of Masco Corporation since 2006,
where she serves as Chair of the Board and on the Audit (Chair) and
Organization & Compensation Committees. Ms. Payne served as a
director of J.C. Penney, Inc. from 2016 until December 2020. She is
a former trustee of Munder Series Trust and Munder Series Trust II,
two open-end management investment companies. She also serves as a
director or trustee of several educational and charitable
organizations.
|
QUALIFICATIONS:
|
Ms. Payne brings strong leadership, operational, and finance
experience to our Board. During her tenure at Taubman, she led the
company through key operational and strategic initiatives. Her
executive experience and leadership roles give her critical
insights into company operations, growth strategy, competition,
compensation plans, employee engagement, diversity and inclusion
initiatives, and information technology that assists our Board in
its oversight function. Her past experience as a CFO and investment
banker provide the Board with financial, accounting, and corporate
finance expertise. She has a high level of financial literacy and
accounting experience that provides the Board with expertise in
understanding and overseeing financial reporting and internal
controls. In addition, her board and board committee experience at
Taubman, Masco, and J.C. Penney give her significant insight into
the governance, compensation, risk management, and
compliance-related matters of public companies. Ms. Payne received
her Bachelor of Science degree in Biology from Elizabethtown
College and holds an M.B.A. from the Fuqua School of Business
Administration, Duke University.
|
|
KEY QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
|
|
•
Relevant Technology and Innovation
•
Risk and Governance Oversight
|
William P. Gipson
|
Age 65
Director since: 2020
Committees:
Audit
Technology
INDEPENDENT
|
Retired President Enterprise Packaging Transformation and Chief
Diversity and Inclusion Officer, The Procter & Gamble Company
(consumer goods company)
|
EXPERIENCE:
|
Mr. Gipson served as President Enterprise Packaging Transformation
and Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer of Procter & Gamble
from 2017 until his retirement in 2019. He joined Procter &
Gamble in 1985 and held management positions of increasing
responsibility including serving as Senior Vice President of
Research and Development, Asia Innovation Centers in Singapore,
Japan and China from 2015 to 2017, and Beauty Care Sector Senior
Vice President for R&D from 2011 to 2015.
|
|
OTHER LEADERSHIP POSITIONS:
|
Mr. Gipson has been a director of ManpowerGroup since November
2020. He also serves on several not-for-profit Boards, including
Executive Leadership Council, CityLink, University of Alabama STEM
Pathway to an MBA and previously served on the Boards of The United
Negro College Fund and The National Action Council for Minorities
in Engineering.
|
QUALIFICATIONS:
|
Mr. Gipson brings extensive leadership, innovation, business
transformation and global business experience to the Board. He
leverages his experience as a former top executive for a global
public company to guide the Company in the areas of product,
packaging and process innovation and market expansion. He also
concurrently served as Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer for
eight years until his retirement, which adds robust and
knowledgeable experiences to draw from in the Board’s role in
oversight of Company culture and diversity and inclusion
initiatives. Mr. Gipson has international management experiences
having served in leadership roles in South America and Singapore
supporting Procter & Gamble’s efforts in each region, in
particular creating a half billion dollar business for a product
new to South America. Mr. Gipson received his Bachelor of Science
degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Alabama.
|
|
KEY QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
•
Industry/Operational/Manufacturing
•
Relevant Technology and Innovation
|
•
Risk and Governance Oversight
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 28
Back to
Contents
Pam Murphy
|
Age 48
Director since: 2019
Committees: Audit
Technology
INDEPENDENT
|
Chief Executive Officer, Imperva, Inc. (cybersecurity and software
services provider)
|
EXPERIENCE:
|
Ms. Murphy is Chief Executive Officer of Imperva, Inc., a cyber
security software and services provider. Before assuming her
current role, she served as chief operating officer for Infor,
Inc., a global leader in business cloud software products for
industry-specific companies and markets, having joined Infor in
2010. Prior to Infor, Ms. Murphy spent 11 years at Oracle
Corporation, with responsibility for global sales operations,
consulting operations in Europe, Middle East and Africa and field
finance for Oracle’s global business units. Before Oracle, she
provided strategy, direction and counsel to clients at Andersen
Consulting and Arthur Andersen.
|
|
OTHER LEADERSHIP POSITIONS:
|
Ms. Murphy has been a director of MeridianLink, Inc., a leading
provider of cloud-based software solutions for financial
institutions since July 2021, where she serves on the Audit
Committee.
|
QUALIFICATIONS:
|
As Chief Executive Officer of Imperva, Ms. Murphy brings strong
leadership and operational experience to the Board. She has
extensive technology, business development and strategy, global
business, and finance experience. This expertise and Ms. Murphy’s
strong executive leadership and risk management skills were gained
in her current role and in previous roles as Chief Operating
Officer of Infor, Inc., a global leader in business cloud software
products (2011-2019), Senior Vice President, Corporate Operations
of Infor (2010-2011) and as Oracle’s Vice President, Finance &
Operations (2007-2010) and Consulting Operations for Europe
(2000-2007). Her background and expertise in leading technology
companies include a wide range of responsibilities for global
operational and financial functions, which aids in the provision of
Board oversight in these areas. Ms. Murphy’s experience with
leading and building teams to sell to the manufacturing industry,
go-to-market solutions, and leading sales and marketing functions
brings additional depth to her role on the Board. Ms. Murphy
received her Bachelor of Commerce in Accounting and Finance from
the University of Cork, Ireland.
|
|
KEY QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
•
Industry/Operational/Manufacturing
|
•
Risk and Governance Oversight
•
Relevant Technology and Innovation
|
Donald R. Parfet
|
Age 69
Director since: 2008
Lead Independent Director
Committees: None
INDEPENDENT
|
Managing Director, Apjohn Group, LLC (business development);
General Partner, Apjohn Ventures Fund LP (venture capital fund)
|
EXPERIENCE:
|
Mr. Parfet has served as Managing Director of Apjohn Group since
2001. Before that, he served as Senior Vice President of Pharmacia
Corporation (pharmaceuticals).
|
OTHER LEADERSHIP POSITIONS:
|
Mr. Parfet has been a director of Kelly Services, Inc. since 2004,
where he serves as non-executive Chairman of the Board, and a
director of Masco Corporation since 2012, where he serves on the
Nominating and Governance and Organization and Compensation
Committees. From 2003 until November 2019, Mr. Parfet served as a
director of Sierra Oncology, Inc. He also serves as a director or
trustee of a number of business, civic, and charitable
organizations.
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS:
|
Mr. Parfet brings extensive finance and industry experience to the
Board. He has served as General Partner of a venture capital fund
since 2003. In this role, he is an active investor in early stage
pharmaceutical companies, which requires evaluating financial and
development risk associated with emerging medicines. During his
years at The Upjohn Company and its successor, Pharmacia &
Upjohn, he had extensive financial and corporate staff management
responsibilities and ultimately senior operational responsibilities
for multiple global business units. He is experienced in leading
business development, strategic planning, risk assessment, human
resource planning, and financial planning and control, as well as
the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and research
instruments. Mr. Parfet has board oversight and corporate
governance experience from his current service on other boards. Mr.
Parfet received his Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from the
University of Arizona and holds an M.B.A. from the University of
Michigan.
|
|
KEY QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
|
|
•
Industry/Operational/Manufacturing
•
Risk and Governance Oversight
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 29
Back to
Contents
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Our director compensation program is designed to attract and retain
qualified directors, fairly compensate directors for the time they
spend in fulfilling their duties and align their compensation
directly with the interests of shareowners. The Board Composition
and Corporate Governance Committee determines the form and amount
of director compensation, with discussion and approval by the full
Board. The Committee relies on Willis Towers Watson to provide
advice on director compensation trends. The Committee benchmarks
its director compensation on an annual basis relative to proxy data
available for companies of similar size ($5-10 billion revenue
range). The market data analysis is a significant factor in our
compensation determinations. As shown, using equity within the
director compensation program, the Board believes that a meaningful
portion of director compensation should be in the form of our
common stock to further align the economic interests of directors
and shareowners. Employees who serve as directors do not receive
any compensation for their director service.
In response to the macroeconomic situation caused by the COVID-19
pandemic, we instituted temporary cost reductions, including salary
reductions for our executives. Consistent with those actions,
effective April 1, 2020, the Board reduced the quarterly cash
payments for its annual cash retainer, Committee Chair Fees, and
the Lead Independent Director fee, by 50%. These amounts were
reinstated to the full amount effective January 2021.
ANNUAL DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
There are three elements of our director compensation program: an
annual retainer, equity awards and Committee Chair fees. The
following table describes each element of director compensation for
fiscal 2021.
|
|
Annual Retainer
|
|
Equity Awards
|
|
Committee Chair
Fees(3)(4)
|
|
Lead Independent
Director Fee
|
Cash
|
|
Common Stock
|
Common Stock
|
Cash
|
Cash
|
Annual Amount
|
|
$107,500
|
|
$107,500(1)
|
|
$40,000(2)
|
|
Varies by Committee and role
|
|
$35,000
|
First Fiscal Quarter Reduced Amount(3)
|
|
$13,438
|
|
Not Applicable
|
|
Not Applicable
|
|
Varies by Committee and role
|
|
$4,375
|
Timing of Payment/Award
|
|
Paid in equal installments on 1st business day of each
quarter
|
|
Granted on 1st business day of fiscal year (or pro-rata
amount upon initial election to the Board)
|
|
Granted on date of Annual Shareowners Meeting (or pro-rata amount
upon initial election to the Board)
|
|
Paid in equal installments on 1st business day of each
quarter
|
|
Paid in equal installments on 1st business day of each
quarter
|
Deferral Election Available
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
Dividend/Dividend Equivalent Eligible
|
|
Not Applicable
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
Not Applicable
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(1)
The $107,500 equated to 490 shares granted under the 2020 Long term
Incentives Plan on October 1, 2020 based on the closing price of
our common stock on the NYSE on that date of $219.52. A prorated
amount of $98,542, which equated to 406 shares, was granted to Mr.
Gipson, who was elected as a director on November 4, 2020, based on
the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on that date of
$242.69.
(2)
The $40,000 equated to 159 shares granted under the 2020 Long term
Incentives Plan on February 2, 2021 based on the closing price of
our common stock on the NYSE on that date of $252.52. A prorated
amount of $10,000, which equated to 42 shares, was granted to Mr.
Gipson when he was elected as a director on November 4, 2020, based
on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on that date
of $242.69.
(3)
Effective April 1, 2020, the quarterly cash payments for annual
cash retainer, Committee Chair fees, and Lead Independent Director
fee were reduced by 50% to align costs with anticipated market
conditions in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and were reinstated to
the full amount effective January 2021. The first fiscal quarter of
fiscal 2021 had reduced cash payments.
(4)
Committee Chair fees recognize the greater workload and
responsibilities of directors who serve in these roles. Annual
Committee member fees were eliminated effective for fiscal 2020 to
allow for consistency, simplicity, and flexibility for Committee
member rotations.
|
|
|
Audit
Committee
|
Compensation and
Talent Management
Committee
|
Board Composition
and Corporate
Governance Committee
|
Technology
Committee
|
|
|
Chair Annual Amount
|
$25,000
|
$20,000
|
$20,000
|
$20,000
|
|
|
Chair Reduced Fiscal 2021 Amount
|
$21,875
|
$17,500
|
$17,500
|
$17,500
|
|
|
Member
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 30
Back to
Contents
Share-based compensation to non-employee directors is delivered
under the 2020 Long-Term Incentives Plan effective February 5, 2020
and includes an annual limit of $750,000 on total compensation of
each non-employee director, including cash- and share-based
compensation.
Under the terms of our Directors Deferred Compensation Plan,
directors may elect to defer all or part of the cash payment of
Board retainer or Committee fees until such time as the director
specifies, with interest on deferred amounts accruing quarterly at
120% of the federal long-term rate set each month by the Secretary
of the Treasury. In addition, each director has the opportunity
each year to defer all or any portion of the annual grants of
common stock, cash retainer, and Committee fees by electing to
instead receive restricted stock units valued, in the case of cash
deferrals, at the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on
the date each payment would otherwise be made in cash.
We reimburse directors for transportation, lodging and other
expenses actually incurred in attending Board and Committee
meetings. We also reimburse directors for similar travel, lodging
and other expenses for their spouses to accompany them to a limited
number of Board meetings held as retreats to which we invite
spouses for business purposes. From time to time and when
available, directors and their spouses are permitted to use our
corporate aircraft for travel to Board meetings. In fiscal 2021 we
hosted one in-person Board retreat and spouses were not in
attendance at any meetings during fiscal 2021.
Directors are eligible to participate in a matching gift program
under which we match donations made to eligible educational, arts
or cultural institutions. Gifts are matched up to an annual
calendar year maximum of $10,000. This same program is available to
all our U.S. salaried employees.
DIRECTOR STOCK OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT
Non-employee directors are subject to stock ownership requirements
and may not sell any shares of our common stock until the
requirement is met. To further align directors’ and shareowners’
economic interests, our Guidelines on Corporate Governance provide
that non-management directors are required to own, within five
years after joining the Board, shares of our common stock
(including restricted stock units) equal in value to five times the
portion of the annual retainer that is payable in cash. All
directors met the requirements as of September 30, 2021, except for
Mr. Gipson, who joined the Board in November 2020 and is within the
five-year compliance window.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL 2022
As stated above, in fiscal 2021 we provided equity awards to our
non-employee directors equal to 50% of the annual retainer
($107,500) on October 1, 2020, and $40,000 on the same date as our
annual shareowner meeting on February 2, 2021. Effective October 1,
2021, we consolidated the equity award timing to coincide with the
date of the annual long term incentive awards for our management
team on the date of the Compensation and Talent Management
Committee meeting in December. On December 7, 2021, each director
received shares equal to $147,500 granted under the 2020 Long Term
Incentives Plan based on the closing price of our common stock on
the NYSE on that date. No other changes were made to director
compensation.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 31
Back to
Contents
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table shows the total compensation earned by each of
our non-employee directors during fiscal 2021.
Name
|
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash(1)
($)
|
|
Stock
Awards(2)
($)
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
|
Change in
Pension Value
and Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(3)
($)
|
|
All Other
Compensation(4)
($)
|
|
Total
($)
|
William P. Gipson(5)
|
|
89,091
|
|
148,542
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
1,186
|
|
238,819
|
J. Phillip Holloman
|
|
94,063
|
|
147,500
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
49,143
|
|
290,706
|
Steven R. Kalmanson
|
|
111,563
|
|
147,500
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
259,063
|
James P. Keane
|
|
115,938
|
|
147,500
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
263,438
|
Lawrence D. Kingsley(6)
|
|
111,563
|
|
147,500
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
15,233
|
|
274,296
|
Pam Murphy
|
|
94,063
|
|
147,500
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
241,563
|
Donald R. Parfet
|
|
124,688
|
|
147,500
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
19,253
|
|
291,441
|
Lisa A. Payne
|
|
111,563
|
|
147,500
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
10,000
|
|
269,063
|
Thomas W. Rosamilia
|
|
94,063
|
|
147,500
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
10,000
|
|
251,563
|
Patricia A. Watson
|
|
94,063
|
|
147,500
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
500
|
|
242,063
|
(1)
This column represents the amount of cash compensation earned in
fiscal 2021 for Board and Committee service (whether or not
deferred and whether or not the directors elected to receive
restricted stock units in lieu of cash fees). Includes the Lead
Independent Director fee for Mr. Parfet. Effective April 1, 2020,
the quarterly cash payments for annual cash retainer, Committee
Chair fees, and the Lead Independent Director fee were reduced by
50% to align costs with anticipated market conditions in light of
the COVID-19 pandemic and were reinstated to the full amount
effective January 2021. The first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2021 had
reduced cash payments.
(2)
Values in this column represent the grant date fair value of stock
awards computed in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP). On October 1, 2020, each
director, except Mr. Gipson, received 490 shares under the 2020
Long Term Incentives Plan with an aggregate grant date fair value
of $107,500 in payment of the common stock portion of the annual
retainer. A prorated amount of $108,542, which equated to 448
shares, was granted to Mr. Gipson, who was elected as a director on
November 4, 2020. On February 2, 2021 (the date of our Annual
Meeting), each director received 159 shares of common stock under
the 2020 Long Term Incentives Plan with an aggregate grant date
fair value of $40,000. The amounts shown do not correspond to the
actual value that may be realized by the directors. Directors may
elect to defer the annual share awards by electing instead to
receive the same number of restricted stock units. As of September
30, 2021, 467, 11,672, 3,559 and 2,162 restricted stock awards
granted under the 2020 Long-Term Incentives Plan and 2003 Directors
Stock Plan as compensation for services as directors were
outstanding for Messrs. Gipson, Holloman, Kingsley, and Parfet,
respectively.
(3)
Aggregate earnings in fiscal 2021 on the directors’ deferred cash
compensation balances were $4,503 for Mr. Kingsley and $2,797 for
Ms. Murphy. We do not pay “above market” interest on non-qualified
deferred compensation; therefore, this column does not include
these amounts.
(4)
This column consists of cash dividend equivalents paid on
restricted stock units for Messrs. Gipson, Holloman, Kingsley and
Parfet, of $1,186, $49,143, $15,233, and $9,253, respectively, and
for Mr. Parfet, Ms. Payne, Mr. Rosamilia, and Ms. Watson, the
Company’s matching donations under the Company’s matching gift
program of $10,000, $10,000, $10,000, and $500, respectively. This
column does not include the perquisites and personal benefits
provided to each director because the aggregate amount provided to
each director was less than $10,000.
(5)
Mr. Gipson was elected as a director on November 4, 2020.
(6)
Mr. Kingsley resigned effective December 1, 2021 and the Board
reduced the number of directors from eleven to ten effective
December 3, 2021.
|
COMPENSATION AND TALENT
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation and Talent Management Committee has reviewed and
discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
contained in this proxy statement. Based on this review and
discussion, the Compensation and Talent Management Committee
recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Compensation and Talent
Management Committee
Lisa A. Payne, Chair
J. Phillip Holloman
Steven R. Kalmanson
Thomas W. Rosamilia
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 32
Back to
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 33
Back to
Contents
Every year our shareowners have the opportunity to provide an
advisory vote on our executive compensation. This advisory vote is
one of many ways you can convey your views about our compensation
programs and policies.
Our compensation philosophy is designed to attract, retain, and
motivate executive talent and emphasize pay for performance,
including the creation of shareowner value. We encourage you to
read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) and
compensation tables that follow for a detailed discussion of our
compensation programs and policies. We believe our compensation
programs and policies are aligned with shareowner interests and
worthy of your continued support as they are supported by a strong
framework of compensation governance and are effective in
implementing our compensation philosophy and achieving our short-
and long-term goals with the appropriate level of risk.
The following resolution will be submitted for a shareowner vote at
the 2022 Annual Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the shareowners of the Company approve, on an
advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive
officers listed in the 2021 Summary Compensation Table included in
the proxy statement for this meeting, as such compensation is
disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K in this proxy
statement under the section entitled “Executive Compensation,”
including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the
compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation
disclosures set forth under that section.”
Although this vote is not binding on the Company, the Board values
your views. The Board and Compensation and Talent Management
Committee will review the results of the vote and take them into
consideration in addressing future compensation policies and
decisions.
 |
ITEM 2: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR”
THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS.
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This CD&A describes our executive compensation philosophy and
program, as well as the specific compensation paid during fiscal
year 2021 to the five current executives shown below, as well as
two former SVP & Chief Financial Officers, Patrick P.
Goris(1) and Steven W.
Etzel(1), during fiscal 2021. We
refer to these individuals as our “named executive officers,” or
NEOs.
BLAKE D. MORET
|
NICHOLAS C. GANGESTAD(1)
|
FRANK C. KULASZEWICZ
|
SCOTT A. GENEREUX
|
REBECCA W. HOUSE
|
Chairman, President &
Chief Executive Officer
|
SVP & Chief Financial
Officer
|
SVP, Lifecycle Services
|
SVP, Chief Revenue
Officer
|
SVP, Chief People and Legal Officer & Secretary
|
(1)
Mr. Goris terminated as SVP & Chief Financial Officer
effective November 13, 2020 and Mr. Etzel served as interim SVP
& Chief Financial Officer until Mr. Gangestad was hired on
March 1, 2021.
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 34
Back to
Contents
COMPENSATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Objectives
|
Philosophy
|
Results Focus
|
Our executive compensation program is designed to:
•
Motivate executives to create shareowner value
•
Attract and retain executive talent
•
Balance rewards with appropriate risk-taking based on performance
from our financial results and strategic company goals
|
Our executive compensation philosophy is built on the following
practices:
•
Align compensation with the Company’s strategy
•
Motivate superior long-term performance
•
Pay for performance by establishing goals tied to the Company’s
results
•
Provide market-competitive pay
•
Recognize that the quality of our leadership has a direct impact on
our performance
|
Our performance measures are aligned with shareowner
interests:
•
Relative Total Shareowner Return (TSR)
•
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (EPS)
•
Organic Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) Growth
•
Strategic Company and individual goals
|
COMPONENTS OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
PROGRAM
Element
|
Form of Award
|
Program Components
|
Period
|
2021 Total Target Direct
Compensation Mix
|
|
|
CEO
|
Other NEOs
|
Base Salary
|
Cash
|
Competitive pay based on scope, experience, and performance
|
One year
|
 |
 |
|
|
Annual
Incentive (ICP)
|
Cash
|
Performance on four key financial goals with adjustment for company
performance against strategic goals and individual performance
|
One year
|
 |
 |
AT-RISK PAY
|
PERFORMANCE BASED
|
Long-Term Incentive (LTI)
|
Performance Shares (40%)
|
Realized value based on TSR performance relative to the S&P 500
Selected GICS (Capital Goods, Software and Services, and
Technology, Hardware, and Equipment)
|
Vest after three years
|
|
|
Stock Options (30%)
|
Realized value based on appreciation in stock price relative to
original grant price
|
Vest over three years in three equal annual installments
|
 |
 |
Time-based Restricted Stock (30%)
|
Realized value based on our stock price performance
|
Vest over three years in three equal annual installments
|
|
|
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 35
Back to
Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION BEST PRACTICES
We employ the following best practices to effectively manage our
executive compensation program:
|
•
Compensation program design and annual benchmarking of executive
pay levels based on data from nationally recognized compensation
consulting firms
•
Rigorous executive stock ownership requirements
•
Overseen by independent directors with significant Compensation and
Talent Management Committee (Committee) experience and knowledge of
the drivers of our long-term performance
|
•
Clawback policy of incentives for all our officers
•
Annual assessment of compensation plan risk
•
Incentive thresholds and targets reward improved year-over-year and
long-term financial performance
•
Balanced use of absolute and relative performance incentive
metrics
|
•
No employment agreements with officers
•
Limited use of change of control agreements, including no excise
tax gross-ups, with a double-trigger requirement for equity
vesting
•
Limited use of perquisites
•
Annual review of compensation consultant independence and
performance
|
SHAREOWNER SUPPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
At our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareowners our shareowners voted to
approve our executive compensation programs on an advisory basis.
We have always received shareowner approval for our executive
compensation programs. In 2021, we engaged with shareowners to
discuss our executive compensation program and feedback from our
outreach calls was presented to the Committee. We believe these
voting results and shareowner feedback received represent an
endorsement of our executive compensation philosophy and pay
programs.
2021 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
Despite continued challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic,
including supply chain constraints, the Company achieved several
key financial, operational, and strategic performance milestones in
fiscal 2021 including:
•
Record revenue levels – reported sales up 10.5%, organic sales up
6.7% year over year
•
Diluted EPS $11.58, Adjusted EPS $9.43 and up 20% year over
year
•
Double digit growth in organic annual recurring revenue – a new
incentive metric aligned with our strategic intent to increase our
resilience and move the business towards greater recurring revenue
streams
•
Cash provided by operating activities and free cash flow (FCF)
performance remained strong with FCF conversion of 103% of Adjusted
Income
•
Acquired Plex Systems and Fiix Inc. to accelerate our strategy to
bring The Connected Enterprise to life by combining
industry-leading cloud technology with our existing software
portfolio and domain expertise
The table below demonstrates the year-over-year results for the
financial measures used in our annual incentive plan:
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 36
Back to
Contents
COMPENSATION ACTIONS DURING FISCAL 2021
We have a long-standing and strong orientation toward pay for
performance in our executive compensation program. The COVID-19
pandemic had a significant impact on our business. We prioritized
the safety of our employees, customers, and communities while
demonstrating agility and ability to maintain production and
business operations. In response to the evolving conditions and
uncertainty the COVID-19 pandemic presented, we implemented
temporary cost reduction actions, including reduction in executive
compensation, that began in fiscal 2020 and ended during the first
quarter of fiscal 2021. Reflecting our pay-for-performance
orientation, our fiscal 2020 financial performance resulted in no
payouts earned under our fiscal 2020 annual incentive compensation
plan (ICP) and a below target number of performance shares earned
for the performance period from October 1, 2017 to September 30,
2020. Also, despite the pandemic’s negative impact on the Company,
no adjustments were made to fiscal 2020 performance targets or
incentive payouts.
Economic conditions stabilized in fiscal 2021, and the Company
benefited from the work done by all our employees to achieve strong
fiscal 2021 financial results. Again, in accordance with our
pay-for-performance orientation, we took actions in fiscal 2021 to
recognize these results. The actions taken in fiscal 2020 and
2021, outlined below, applied consistently across all participants
in these programs:
We are performance oriented and set stretch financial goals,
balancing rewards with appropriate risk. We had overall above
target financial performance and progress towards key strategic
goals, resulting in fiscal 2021 ICP awards above target for our
NEOs, average payout of 139.1% of target. Please reference 2021
Performance and Payout Results section below for further
information.
For the performance period from October 1, 2018 to September 30,
2021, our three year TSR of 74.4% was at the 67th percentile of the
S&P 500 Index and above our target of 60th percentile,
resulting in 144% of the target number of performance shares
earned. Please reference the 2019-2021 Performance Share Payout
Results section below for further information.
Our strategy is to bring The Connected Enterprise to life by
integrating control and information across the enterprise. We
improve customer outcomes by combining advanced industrial
automation with the latest information technology. Our growth and
performance strategy seeks to:
•
increase market share of our core automation platforms by expanding
our vertical end market focus, strengthening our competitive
differentiation in areas like Motion and advanced material
handling, and expanding our market presence in Europe and Asia;
•
drive double digit growth in Information Solutions and Connected
Services;
•
acquire companies that accelerate what we are doing in Information
Solutions and Connected Services (e.g., operations management
software and industrial cybersecurity services), advanced material
handling offerings, and our market presence in Europe and Asia;
•
increase our internal capabilities through the hiring of executive
talent to enhance the organization capabilities and bolster
executive benchstrength;
•
expand our operational capacity and resiliency;
•
deploy human and financial resources to strengthen our technology
leadership and our intellectual capital business model;
•
deploy human and financial resources to strengthen our technology
leadership and our intellectual capital business model;
•
continuously improve quality and customer experience; and
•
drive annual cost productivity.
We believe:
•
Our employees’ knowledge of our customers and their applications
and our technology are key factors that make our long-term business
strategy work.
•
It is important to align the compensation of our leadership with
our long-term business strategy. Our short- and long-term incentive
plans focus the management team’s efforts in the areas that are
critical to the success of our long-term business strategy.
•
The quality of our leadership has a direct impact on our
performance and success.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 37
Back to
Contents
•
Rockwell Automation has a long-standing and strong orientation
toward pay for performance in its executive compensation program.
We maintain this orientation throughout economic cycles that may
cause fluctuation in our operating results and compensation
outcomes.
•
A significant portion of an executive’s compensation should be
variable. The variable portions of our annual incentive plan (ICP)
and long term incentives (LTI) are directly linked to our
performance and the creation of shareowner value. As shown in the
charts below, 88% of the CEO’s target compensation, and
approximately 81% of the other NEOs’ target compensation, was
compensation at-risk in fiscal 2021:
The table below outlines the typical timing and annual review
process that our Committee follows.
The Committee may deviate from this timing to make compensation
changes regarding executives who are promoted or hired during the
year or to respond to unusual conditions, such as the COVID-19
pandemic, that require decisions on a different timetable.
Willis Towers Watson, the Committee’s independent compensation
consultant, the CEO, and certain other executives assist the
Committee with its review of compensation of our officers.
PEER GROUP
The Committee believes it is important to clearly understand the
relevant market for executive talent to inform its decision-making
and to ensure that our executive compensation program supports our
recruitment and retention needs. The compensation review process
incorporates the prevalent market practice of using a defined peer
group for benchmarking NEO pay levels and practices. Reflecting our
growth in information technology and industrial operational
technology software solutions, we incorporate specific industry
sectors as part of the selection process for a relevant benchmark
to our labor market for executive talent.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 38
Back to
Contents
Following a review process led by Willis Towers Watson, the
Committee selected the following 20 companies to constitute the
2021 peer group (the “Compensation Peer Group”) at their September
2020 meeting. The only change from the 2020 peer group was to
remove Symantec Corporation as they were acquired by Broadcom
Inc.
We also consider broader market data in setting each element of our
NEOs’ and other officers’ compensation. In particular, the
Committee reviewed custom industry market data from the results of
surveys provided by Willis Towers Watson and Aon Hewitt. This
custom benchmarking includes specific industry sectors that best
represent our labor market, size-adjusted based on revenue to yield
an index of approximately 275 companies. The Company is near to or
above the median revenue of both this group and the Compensation
Peer Group (collectively, the “Peer Groups”).
We believe our compensation review process provides an appropriate
picture of where we compete for talent and aligns with best
practices in the market.
USE OF TALLY SHEETS
We consider the total compensation (earned or potentially
available) for each NEO in establishing each element of
compensation. As part of our compensation review process, the
Committee conducts a total compensation review or “Tally Sheet”.
This review encompasses three years of all elements of
compensation, including base salary, annual incentives, realized
value of LTI grants, perquisites, health benefits, and retirement
benefits. We also review each NEOs’ Company stock ownership as well
as potential termination payments. Based upon the results of this
analysis, the Committee concluded that our compensation programs
are in line with our compensation philosophy.
ROLE OF MANAGEMENT
The Committee assesses the performance of the CEO and sets the
CEO’s compensation in executive session without the CEO present.
The CEO reviews the performance of our other officers, including
the other NEOs, with the Committee and makes recommendations
regarding each element of their compensation for the Committee’s
review and approval. The Committee and the CEO are assisted in
their review by Willis Towers Watson and the Senior Vice President,
Chief People & Legal Officer. The other NEOs do not play a role
in their own compensation determinations other than discussing
their performance with the CEO.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 39
Back to
Contents
BASE SALARY
The Committee reviews base salaries for our officers on an annual
basis, as well as at the time of hire, promotion or other change in
responsibilities. In determining our NEOs’ base salaries, the
Committee considers:
•
the median market data of the Peer Groups for their positions;
•
our performance and the performance of the NEOs’ business segments
(where applicable), as well as the NEOs’ performance compared to
operating and leadership objectives;
•
scope, experience, skills, and recent significant promotions or
changes in role or responsibilities;
•
internal equity among the NEOs;
•
expected future contributions and leadership; and
•
salary increase plans for other employees.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we instituted temporary cost
reductions, including base salary reductions of 25% for Mr. Moret
and 15% for the other officers reporting to our CEO effective from
April 27 to December 6, 2020. The table below summarizes the
changes in NEO base salary during fiscal 2021.
Name
|
|
Temporary
Reduction
(%)
|
|
October 1, 2020
Reduced Base
Salary
($)
|
|
December 7,
2020
Reinstated
Base Salary
($)
|
|
Base Salary
Upon Hire or
Promotion
|
July 5, 2021
Increase
(%)
|
|
September 30,
2021 Base
Salary ($)
|
|
|
FY2021
Salary
($)
|
|
FY2021
Bonus
($)
|
Blake D. Moret
|
|
(25
|
%)
|
872,925
|
|
1,163,900
|
|
|
—
|
|
1,163,900
|
|
|
1,111,502
|
|
—
|
Nicholas C. Gangestad (1)
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
800,000
|
—
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
472,031
|
|
750,000
|
Scott A. Genereux (2)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
600,000
|
—
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
300,000
|
Rebecca W. House
|
|
(15
|
%)
|
510,000
|
|
600,000
|
|
—
|
3
|
%
|
618,000
|
|
|
588,207
|
|
—
|
Frank C. Kulaszewicz
|
|
(15
|
%)
|
595,765
|
|
700,900
|
|
—
|
3
|
%
|
721,927
|
|
|
687,124
|
|
—
|
Steven W. Etzel (1)
|
(15
|
%)
|
331,520
|
|
—
|
|
600,000
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
317,537
|
|
480,000
|
Patrick P. Goris (1)
|
|
(15
|
%)
|
510,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
62,529
|
|
—
|
(1)
Mr. Goris terminated as SVP & Chief Financial Officer effective
November 13, 2020. Mr. Etzel served as interim SVP & Chief
Financial Officer effective November 13, 2020 when his base
salary increased to $600,000 until he retired April 30, 2021.
Additionally, Mr. Etzel received a $480,000 cash bonus for his
interim service. Mr. Gangestad was hired March 1, 2021 and received
a $750,000 cash sign-on bonus with a two- year clawback
provision.
(2)
Mr. Genereux was hired February 1, 2021 and received a $300,000
cash sign-on bonus with a two-year clawback provision.
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 40
Back to
Contents
ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
We provide annual incentive opportunities to our NEOs under our
ICP.
NEO TARGETS
At the start of each fiscal year, or upon hire, we establish for
each executive an incentive compensation target equal to a
percentage of the individual’s base salary effective as of the
fiscal year-end period. For the NEOs, the target is based on the
median of the Peer Groups, with adjustments to reflect internal
equity and other subjective factors.
Effective for fiscal 2021, the targets as a percentage of base
salary (annual incentive targets) for our NEOs are provided below.
Mr. Moret increased from 130% to 140% and Ms. House and Mr.
Kulaszewicz increased from 70% to 80% to reflect each officer’s
scope of role, internal equity, and position relative to the market
benchmarks. The table below summarizes the fiscal 2021 annual and
prorated incentive targets for our NEOs eligible for fiscal 2021
ICP awards which can range from 0 to 200% of target incentive, in
line with our pay-for-performance orientation:
Name
|
Annual
Incentive
Target
(%)
|
|
Fiscal Year 2021
Prorated Incentive
Target
(%)
|
|
Blake D. Moret
|
140
|
%
|
—
|
|
Nicholas C. Gangestad (1)
|
100
|
%
|
58
|
%
|
Scott A. Genereux (1)
|
80
|
%
|
53
|
%
|
Rebecca W. House
|
80
|
%
|
—
|
|
Frank C. Kulaszewicz
|
80
|
%
|
—
|
|
(1)
For Messrs. Gangestad and Genereux, fiscal 2021 incentive is
prorated for time worked in the fiscal period based on March 1,
2021 and February 1, 2021 date of hire, respectively.
|
2021 ICP MEASURES AND GOALS
The Committee annually reviews the compensation measures and
weightings and our fiscal 2021 ICP was designed to reward our
executives for achieving Company financial results. The following
table indicates the fiscal 2021 ICP financial measures and
weightings for assessment of Company-wide financial performance for
all the NEOs:

Beginning in fiscal 2021, organic annual recurring revenue growth
was added as one of the four incentive compensation measures, in
lieu of return on invested capital (ROIC). Annual recurring revenue
(ARR) enables measurement of progress in growing our recurring
revenue business. It represents the annual contract value of all
active recurring revenue contracts at any point in time. Recurring
revenue is defined as a revenue stream that is contractual,
typically for a period of 12 months or more, and has a high
probability of renewal. The probability of renewal is based on
historical revenue experience of the individual revenue streams, or
management’s best estimates if historical renewal experience is not
available. Organic ARR growth is calculated as the dollar change in
ARR between September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020 and adjusted
to exclude the effects of currency translation and acquisitions,
divided by ARR as of September 30, 2020. Organic ARR growth,
combined with organic sales growth, adjusted EPS, and free cash
flow directly link incentive metrics to key company financial goals
with a balance between earnings, sales, and capital management.
The Committee uses the Company’s annual operating plan as the basis
for setting goals for adjusted EPS, organic sales growth, free cash
flow, and organic ARR growth under our incentive compensation
plans. The ICP financial goals for fiscal 2021 are shown below. The
Committee determined that meeting these goals would require
significant effort and achievement on the part of the management
team and all Company employees in the continued execution of our
strategy. Target goals for adjusted EPS and organic sales growth
were set at the midpoint of external guidance and higher than the
performance levels achieved in fiscal 2020. Moreover, the Committee
determined that no payments would be made under the ICP if adjusted
EPS was less than $7.60—regardless of performance against any of
the other financial goals. The Committee determined that the
organic ARR growth of 25% and free cash flow goal of $1,043
million, set at 103% of adjusted income, were appropriate based on
economic conditions and long-term sales growth expectations.
Beginning in fiscal 2021, the Company has changed its adjusted EPS
definition to exclude the impact of purchase accounting
depreciation and amortization attributable to Rockwell Automation,
Inc. and the related tax effects of such exclusion ($0.28 in fiscal
2021). We believe this new definition provides more useful
information about our operating performance and allows management
and investors to better compare our operating performance period
over period, given our increased inorganic investments.
While achieving our financial goals is extremely important in
determining our annual incentive compensation, the ICP award
process was refined in 2021 to include an adjustment based on
strategic company goal performance. In 2021, our strategic goals
were focused on organizational development and our cultural
evolution that are foundational to driving business results and are
inclusive of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals.
Having the right environment where all people can be engaged and
productive is critical to our success. A positive or negative ten
percent adjustment to the fiscal 2021 annual ICP formula payout
based on financial measure performance could be made based on the
CEO and Committee’s assessment of progress made in four tenets of
our culture: strengthening our commitment to
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 41
Back to
Contents
and demonstration of integrity, diversity, equity and inclusion,
comparing ourselves to the best alternatives, increased speed of
decision making, and ensuring a steady stream of fresh ideas.
Additionally, the Committee can adjust the NEO payout based on
individual performance downwards to zero or upwards to two times
the NEOs target annual incentive amount.
2021 PERFORMANCE AND PAYOUT RESULTS
The following table shows the 2021 Company financial goals used to
determine award payouts under our ICP for fiscal 2021 and our
performance compared to those goals. Based on our above target
performance of adjusted EPS, organic sales growth, and free cash
flow performance, and progress toward our new organic ARR growth
measure, we have 2021 ICP plan performance of 134.1% of target
incentive for our NEOs.
As noted above, the ICP award process was refined to include an
adjustment based on strategic company goal performance. In 2021, we
made progress on all four of our culture tenets. In particular, our
attraction and integration of new talent, including executive
leaders and talent from recent acquisitions, demonstrated a
successful focus on ensuring we have a steady stream of fresh
ideas. Given the impact this progress had on our fiscal year 2021
results and how it positions us well for the future, upon
recommendation of our CEO, the Committee made a positive adjustment
of 5% of target to the calculated FY 2021 Incentive Plan
Performance for all of our ICP plan participants, including our
NEOs. This adjustment highlights the importance of our culture to
delivering our strategy. No other individual NEO payout adjustments
were made in 2021.

(1)
Adjusted EPS is a non-GAAP earnings measure that excludes
non-operating pension and postretirement benefit (cost) credit,
purchase accounting depreciation and amortization attributable to
Rockwell Automation, net income (loss) attributable to
noncontrolling interests, and gains and losses on investments,
including their respective tax effects. Non-operating pension and
postretirement benefit (cost) credit is defined as all components
of our net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost except
for service cost. In fiscal 2021, the adjusted EPS used for ICP
purposes excluded a $0.71 gain from a legal settlement net of tax
and a discrete tax benefit and excluded $0.38 of one-time
incremental accelerated investment costs net of tax and negative
impacts from acquisitions that were not a part of our original
fiscal 2021 target. Historically, exclusions from adjusted EPS for
ICP purposes have been both positive, such as in 2020, and
negative, such as in 2021.
(2)
Organic sales growth for the Company as used for ICP purposes is a
non-GAAP financial measure and excludes the positive effects of
changes in currency exchange rates (2.3%) and acquisitions and
inorganic investments (1.5%). When we acquire businesses, we
exclude sales in the current period for which there are no
comparable sales in the prior period. We determine the effect of
changes in currency exchange rates by translating the respective
period’s sales using the same currency exchange rates that were in
effect during the prior year.
(3)
ARR is a key metric that enables measurement of progress in growing
our recurring revenue business. It represents the annual contract
value of all active recurring revenue contracts at any point in
time. Recurring revenue is defined as a revenue stream that is
contractual, typically for a period of 12 months or more, and has a
high probability of renewal. The probability of renewal is based on
historical renewal experience of the individual revenue streams, or
management’s best estimate if historical renewal experience is not
available. Organic ARR growth is calculated as the dollar change in
ARR, adjusted to exclude the effects of currency translation and
acquisitions, divided by ARR as of the prior period. The effects of
currency translation are excluded by calculating Organic ARR on a
constant currency basis. When we acquire businesses, we exclude the
effect of ARR in the current period for which there was no
comparable ARR in the prior period.
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 42
Back to
Contents
(4)
We calculated free cash flow, a non-GAAP performance measure, for
ICP purposes as cash provided by operating activities ($1,261
million), minus capital expenditures ($120 million), minus
adjustments of ($36 million). This reflects $55 million of positive
adjustments for the settlement of interest rate swaps, the impact
of one-time incremental accelerated investments and the
acquisitions. It also reflects $91 million of negative adjustment
related to the cash received from a legal settlement, and an
adjustment for a voluntary contribution to the US pension trust
that was not made but included in the target. All amounts are net
of tax. See Note 7, Long-term and Short-term Debt, to our audited
consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, for
additional information regarding the interest rate swaps. Our
definition of free cash flow for ICP purposes takes into
consideration capital investments required to maintain the
operations of our businesses and execute our strategy. Cash
provided by operating activities adds back non-cash depreciation
expense to earnings but does not reflect a charge for necessary
capital expenditures. Our definition of free cash flow may differ
from definitions used by other companies.
|
The following table includes the fiscal 2021 incentive payment
calculations for our NEOs. Mr. Etzel is excluded as he received a
one-time bonus of $480,000 as part of his interim assignment as SVP
& Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Goris was not eligible because
of his termination on November 13, 2020.
Name
|
Fiscal Year
End Base
Salary
($)
|
Annual
Incentive
Target
(%)
|
Fiscal 2021
Prorated
Incentive
Target
(%)
|
Fiscal 2021
Incentive
plan earned
payout
(%)
|
Fiscal 2021
Incentive
Payments
($)
|
Blake D. Moret
|
1,163,900
|
140%
|
—
|
139.1%
|
2,266,600
|
Nicholas C. Gangestad
|
800,000
|
100%
|
58%
|
139.1%
|
649,100
|
Scott A. Genereux
|
600,000
|
80%
|
53%
|
139.1%
|
445,200
|
Rebecca W. House
|
618,000
|
80%
|
—
|
139.1%
|
687,800
|
Frank C. Kulaszewicz
|
721,927
|
80%
|
—
|
139.1%
|
803,400
|
LONG-TERM INCENTIVES (LTI)
The principal purpose of our long-term incentives is to reward
management for creating shareowner value and to align the financial
interests of management and shareowners. The creation of shareowner
value is important not only in absolute terms, but also relative to
the value created as compared to other investment alternatives
available to our shareowners. The Committee approves annual LTI
awards for the CEO and executive officers, including the other
NEOs, by individual and the CEO recommends to the Committee the LTI
awards for other employees in total as a group.
As a critical element of our executive compensation program,
at-risk long-term incentives make up the largest component of total
pay for our NEOs. In fiscal 2021, the overall structure of our LTI
program for executives continued to have three components but the
allocation of stock options, performance shares, and restricted
stock was adjusted to the following percentages of the total LTI
value:
This allocation of LTI awards considers a review of market practice
for our Peer Groups, our pay-for-performance philosophy, and strong
emphasis on creating shareowner value and attracting and retaining
talent.
We generally make LTI awards near the beginning of each fiscal year
at the same time the Committee performs its annual management
performance evaluation and takes other compensation actions. Annual
LTI awards for officers occur on the same date as annual LTI awards
for our other professional and managerial employees. As the grant
date for our annual LTI awards generally occurs on the day the
Committee meets in the first quarter of our fiscal year, the grant
date is set in advance when the schedule of Committee meetings is
arranged. We do not grant LTI awards in anticipation of the release
of material non-public information. Similarly, we do not time the
release of information based on LTI award grant dates.
We occasionally award LTI awards to new executives as they are
hired or promoted during the year. These awards are approved by the
Committee or through CEO delegation, and the award date is the date
the award is approved or, if later, the start date for a new
executive or promotion date.
In determining the fiscal 2021 LTI awards for the NEOs, the
following factors were considered:
•
information on each NEO’s total compensation compared to the
compensation for similar positions at the companies in the Peer
Groups;
•
our practice of moving compensation to market-competitive levels
over two to three years following a significant promotion and to
recognize development in an NEO’s role (which affected compensation
for Messrs. Moret, Goris, and Wlodarczyk);
•
internal comparisons with other officers;
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 43
Back to
Contents
•
historical information regarding the NEOs’ long-term compensation
opportunities; and
•
past and expected future contributions to our long-term
performance.
The following table includes the aggregate grant date fair value of
awards granted in fiscal 2021. These amounts were determined using
the valuation method described in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards
Table. Mr. Moret received an LTI award that was 15% higher than
prior year because of his leadership and competencies demonstrated
in the role and his position to market median of our Compensation
Peer Group. Messrs. Gangestad and Genereux were hired March 1, 2021
and February 1, 2021, respectively, and amounts below reflect LTI
awards upon hire of restricted stock units that vest in three equal
increments at one, two, and three years after the grant date. The
awards for Messrs. Gangestad and Genereux were required to induce
them to join the Company and were intended to recognize they did
not participate in the Company’s fiscal 2021 annual LTI awards
delivered December 2020. Ms. House received a one-time LTI award of
$300,000 of restricted shares that vest three years after the award
date in recognition of her promotion to Chief People & Legal
Officer in addition to her annual LTI award of $1.2 million. Mr.
Etzel received an LTI award of restricted stock in recognition of
his agreement to delay his retirement to serve as interim SVP &
Chief Financial Officer after Mr. Goris terminated from this role
on November 13, 2020. Mr. Etzel’s LTI award vested on October 31,
2021, which was six months after his April 30, 2021 retirement.
Name
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
2021 LTI
($)
|
|
Stock
Options
($)
|
Performance
Shares(1)
($)
|
Restricted
Stock
($)
|
Blake D. Moret
|
|
|
|
|
6,504,183
|
|
1,952,544
|
|
2,600,922
|
|
1,950,717
|
Nicholas C. Gangestad
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,997
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,000,997
|
Scott G. Genereux
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,016
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,000,016
|
Rebecca W. House
|
|
|
|
|
1,503,013
|
|
360,555
|
|
481,432
|
|
661,026
|
Frank C. Kulaszewicz
|
|
|
|
|
1,302,379
|
|
391,064
|
|
520,185
|
|
391,130
|
Steven W. Etzel
|
|
|
|
|
601,848
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
601,848
|
(1)
This column represents performance shares at target level
performance and can range from 0 to 200%.
|
STOCK OPTIONS
We believe that stock options are an appropriate vehicle to reward
management for increases in shareowner value, as they provide no
value unless our share price increases. Our stock option grants
vest in three equal increments one, two, and three years after the
grant date, and have a 10-year life. The exercise price of all
stock options is the fair market value of our stock at the close of
trading on the date of the grant. We do not reprice stock options,
and it is prohibited by our long-term incentive plan.
PERFORMANCE SHARES
Performance shares are designed to reward management for our
relative TSR performance compared to our benchmarks over a
three-year period. The payouts of performance shares granted will
be made in shares of our common stock or cash, as determined by the
Committee, and will range from 0% to 200% of the target number of
shares awarded. The performance shares are not eligible for
dividends.
For performance shares awarded in fiscal 2021, we changed our
relative performance benchmark group index to include companies
that are more aligned with the Company’s strategic direction as
indicated below. We also updated the payout formula, as summarized
below, to align more closely to our Compensation Peer Groups’
prevalent practices to ensure we can attract and retain talent. The
number of shares earned will be interpolated for results between
those percentiles. If performance shares are earned but absolute
TSR is negative, the number of shares earned will be capped at
target.
|
Threshold
|
Target
|
Maximum
|
Rockwell Automation TSR Performance Relative to S&P 500
Selected GICS (Capital Goods, Software and Services, and
Technology, Hardware, and Equipment) over a Three-Year Period
|
25th
Percentile
|
50th
Percentile
|
75th
Percentile
|
Percent of Target Shares Earned
|
50%
|
100%
|
200%
|
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 44
Back to
Contents
For performance shares awarded in fiscal 2019 and 2020, our
relative TSR performance is compared to the S&P 500 Index and
payout formula, as shown below. The number of shares earned will be
interpolated for results between those percentiles. If performance
shares are earned but absolute TSR for the three-year period is
negative, the number of shares earned will be reduced by 50%.
|
Threshold
|
Target
|
Maximum
|
Rockwell Automation TSR Performance Relative to S&P 500
Index
over a Three-Year Period
|
30th
Percentile
|
60th
Percentile
|
75th
Percentile
|
Percent of Target Shares Earned
|
0%
|
100%
|
200%
|
2019-2021 PERFORMANCE SHARE PAYOUT RESULTS
For the performance period from October 1, 2018, to September 30,
2021, our three-year TSR of 74.4% was at the 67th percentile of the companies in the S&P
500 Index, above the target 60th
percentile, resulting in 144% of the target number of performance
shares being earned. See footnote 4 to the Outstanding Equity
Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table for information about the number of
shares earned by the NEOs.
The following line graph compares the cumulative TSR of our common
stock against the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index
for the three-year period from October 1, 2018, to
September 30, 2021, assuming in each case a fixed investment
of $100 at the respective closing prices on September 30, 2018, and
reinvestment of all dividends. Our cumulative three-year
performance outpaced the S&P 500 Index, over the same
period.
The cumulative total returns on Rockwell Automation common stock
and the S&P 500 Index as of each September 30 plotted in the
above graph are as follows:
|
9/30/2018
|
9/30/2019
|
9/30/2020
|
9/30/2021
|
Rockwell Automation*
|
$
|
100.00
|
$
|
89.96
|
$
|
122.96
|
$
|
166.39
|
S&P 500 Index
|
$
|
100.00
|
$
|
104.25
|
$
|
120.05
|
$
|
156.07
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
$
|
3.51
|
$
|
3.88
|
$
|
4.08
|
$
|
4.28
|
* Includes the reinvestment of all dividends in our common
stock.
|
We believe the TSR we have delivered, and the payout history of our
long-term incentive plan demonstrates our pay-for-performance
philosophy and our emphasis on long-term incentives that are
aligned with the interest of shareowners.
RESTRICTED STOCK
We grant restricted shares primarily to attract and retain high
quality executives.
We previously granted shares of restricted stock that cliff-vested
after three years, if continuously employed through the vesting
date, and paid dividends quarterly in cash at the same time
dividends were paid to shareowners. Effective with our annual
awards granted on December 10, 2020, we grant restricted stock
units that vest in three equal increments at one, two, and
three years after the grant date. The restricted stock units
accrue dividend equivalents that are paid in cash upon vesting of
the underlying shares. We believe these changes align to prevalent
market practice and better position us to attract and retain
talent.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 45
Back to
Contents
OUTSTANDING LTI AWARDS
Below includes a summary of our outstanding LTI awards granted
during the last three years.
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
|
2022
|
|
2023
|
|
December 4, 2018
Grant Date
2019-2021 Vest
Period
|
•
45% Stock options -
vest over three years in three equal annual installments
•
40% Performance shares
- vest after three years based on TSR relative to
S&P 500 with target payout at 60th percentile
•
15% Restricted stock -
vest after three years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 5, 2019
Grant Date
2020-2022 Vest Period
|
•
45% Stock options -
vest over three years in three equal annual installments
•
40% Performance shares
- vest after three years based on TSR relative to
S&P 500 with target payout at 60th percentile
•
15% Restricted stock -
vest after three years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 10, 2020
Grant Date
2021-2023 Vest
Period
|
•
30% Stock options -
vest over three years in three equal annual installments
•
40% Performance shares
- vest after three years based on TSR relative to
S&P 500 Capital Goods, Software and Services, and Technology,
Hardware & Equipment with target payout at 50th percentile
•
30% Restricted stock -
vest over three years in three equal annual installments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERQUISITES
During fiscal 2021, our officers received a very limited perquisite
package that included personal liability insurance, annual
physicals, and, if applicable, recreational activities at Board
retreats, relocation assistance, expatriate benefits, and personal
use of the Company plane. Upon retirement, officers may elect to
continue the personal liability insurance coverage at their own
expense. On occasion, and with the approval of our CEO, officers
may have a family member accompany them on the Company plane when
traveling on business. Personal use of the Company plane is
generally prohibited; however, during fiscal 2021, Mr. Moret
had three personal use trips to minimize the health risks during
the COVID-19 pandemic. In line with our policy, Mr. Moret incurred
taxable income for that travel. We do not in any way compensate
officers for any income tax owed for personal travel.
OTHER
Our NEOs receive the same benefits as other eligible U.S. salaried
employees. They participate on the same basis as other eligible
U.S. salaried employees in our health and welfare plans, pension
plan and 401(k) savings plan. Our non-qualified pension and savings
plans use the same formulas as our qualified plans and provide
benefits that may not be paid under our qualified plans due to
limitations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the “Code”). Our deferred compensation plan offers investment
measurement options similar to those in our 401(k) savings plan and
does not have any guaranteed rates of return.
The Compensation and Talent Management Committee engages Willis
Towers Watson annually to conduct a review of all of our
compensation programs relative to the potential for incentives to
motivate excessive risk-taking in a way that could materially
affect the Company. Willis Towers Watson reviews the measures used
in each program, the target-setting process, and the overall
governance of our compensation plans. The 2021 review concluded
that we have strong governance procedures and that our plans do not
present a material risk to the Company or encourage excessive
risk-taking by participants.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 46
Back to
Contents
Willis Towers Watson determined our compensation programs do not
encourage our executives to take excessive risk due to, among many
considerations, the following plan design elements:
|
|
|
•
Our ICP provides a balance among organic sales and ARR growth,
earnings, and cash flow performance, limiting the effect of
over-performance in one area at the expense of others
•
Payouts under our ICP are capped at twice the NEO’s ICP target,
limiting excessive rewards for short-term results
•
Our recoupment policy and clawback agreements mitigate against
risk
|
•
The Compensation and Talent Management Committee can reduce or
withhold an incentive payment if it determines that the executive
has caused the Company to incur excessive risk
•
A majority of the total direct compensation for our NEOs is in the
form of long-term incentives
•
Our mix of equity award types appropriately motivates long-term
performance
|
•
A majority of our equity awards vest over a period of several
years, which encourages a long-term focus
•
Our NEOs are subject to stock ownership requirements, which align
their long-term interests with the interests of our other
shareowners
|
Based on our shareowner advisory vote on executive compensation, as
well as input gained during shareowner outreach, the Compensation
and Talent Management Committee determined that our current
executive compensation program is well aligned with shareowner
interests and expectations.
PEER GROUP
Following a rigorous process review of our Compensation Peer Group,
led by Willis Towers Watson, the Compensation and Talent Management
Committee removed Regal Beloit and Vishay Intertechnology from the
2022 peer group to better align our peer group with our Company’s
revenue and market capitalization. Additions to the 2022 peer group
include Palo Alto Networks to increase the peer group focus on the
Systems and Software industry sector in alignment with the business
strategy and Emerson Electric Co. as a direct competitor for
talent.
BASE SALARY
The salaries for NEOs, excluding Messrs. Moret, Etzel and Goris,
were increased 3.25% effective on January 3, 2022, consistent with
the merit increases for all employees.
ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
For fiscal 2022, NEOs annual incentive compensation measures will
be subject to ICP financial measures that remain the same as in
fiscal 2021 as explained above.
In fiscal 2022, there were no changes in the annual incentive
compensation target as a percentage of base salary for our NEOs
except for Mr. Moret who was increased from 140% to 150% by the
Committee. Target amounts will generally be earned under our ICP if
we achieve our financial goals for the year, and maximum payouts
will be earned if we significantly exceed the goals. In determining
the payout curves, the Committee considered:
•
actual fiscal 2021 performance,
•
the rate of growth required to achieve our goals, and
•
the impact of global macroeconomic factors on the Company’s
business prospects.
The Committee determined that no payments will be made under the
ICP if Adjusted EPS is less than $9.20—regardless of performance
against any of the other financial measures.
While achieving our financial goals is extremely important in
determining our annual incentive compensation, the 2022 ICP award
process will continue to include an adjustment based on strategic
company goal performance. In 2022, our strategic goals will
continue to be focused on organizational development and our
cultural evolution that are foundational to driving business
results and are inclusive of environmental, social, and governance
(ESG) goals. Having the right environment where all people can be
engaged and productive is critical to our success. A positive or
negative ten percent adjustment to the fiscal 2022 annual ICP
formula payout based on financial measure performance could be made
based on the CEO and Committee’s assessment of progress made in
four tenets of our culture: strengthening our commitment to and
demonstration of integrity, diversity, equity and inclusion,
comparing ourselves to the best alternatives, increased speed of
decision making, and ensuring a steady stream of fresh ideas.
Additionally, the Committee can adjust the NEO payout based on
individual performance downwards to zero or upwards to two times
the NEOs target annual incentive amount.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 47
Back to
Contents
LONG-TERM INCENTIVES
In fiscal 2022, the overall structure of our long-term incentive
program for executives will continue to have three components and
remain unchanged from fiscal 2021. At its December 2021 meeting,
the Committee approved the following annual grants of equity awards
to the NEOs for fiscal 2022:
Name
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
2022 LTI
($)
|
|
Stock
Options
($)
|
Performance
Shares at
Target
($)
|
Restricted
Stock Units
($)
|
Blake D. Moret
|
|
|
|
|
9,000,000
|
|
30,794
|
|
7,481
|
|
7,698
|
Nicholas C. Gangestad
|
|
|
|
|
3,200,000
|
|
10,949
|
|
2,660
|
|
2,737
|
Scott G. Genereux
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
6,844
|
|
1,663
|
|
1,711
|
Rebecca W. House
|
|
|
|
|
1,800,000
|
|
6,159
|
|
1,497
|
|
1,540
|
Frank C. Kulaszewicz
|
|
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
4,448
|
|
1,081
|
|
1,112
|
We calculated the number of options, performance shares, and
restricted stock units using the closing price of our common stock
of $350.76 on the December 7, 2021, grant date. The exercise price
of options continues to be the closing price on the date of the
grant. The awards have terms and conditions as described in the
Long-Term Incentives section above.
CHANGE OF CONTROL AND SEVERANCE
We have change of control agreements with each of the NEOs and
certain other officers. Our current agreements are effective if
there is a change of control (as defined in the agreements) on or
before September 30, 2022. These agreements are reviewed and
renewed every three years.
For a description of the purpose and value of the change of control
agreements, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of
Control.”
We do not have severance agreements in place with the NEOs for
terminations other than those covered by our change of control
agreements. However, we have at times entered into severance
agreements with executives in connection with the termination of
their employment, with the terms and conditions depending upon the
individual circumstances of the termination, the transition role we
expect from the executive, and the Company’s best interests.
STOCK OWNERSHIP POLICY
We believe our focus on pay for performance is sharpened by
aligning the long-term financial interests of our officers with
those of our other shareowners. Accordingly, our stock ownership
policy sets the following minimum ownership requirements for our
officers. Our policy requires the following ownership requirement
for our NEOs:
|
Common Stock Market Value
(Multiple of Base Salary)
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
6
|
Senior Vice Presidents
|
3
|
Officers must meet the ownership requirement within
five years. There is also a hold-until-met requirement that
prohibits an officer below the ownership guideline from selling his
or her shares of stock, except for sales to cover taxes, the
exercise price of stock options, and transaction costs. In
addition, the policy expressly encourages officers to use Rule
10b5-1 trading plans for transactions involving sales of Company
common stock.
Effective October 27, 2021, the Board adopted an updated stock
ownership policy that excludes stock option value in determining
stock ownership. Shares owned directly (including restricted shares
and restricted stock units) or through our savings plans (including
share equivalents under our non-qualified savings plans) are
considered in determining whether an officer meets the ownership
requirements.
As of September 30, 2021, all NEOs met the stock ownership
requirements, regardless of the exclusion of stock option
values.
OFFICER TRADING RESTRICTIONS
Under our trading procedures, an officer may not engage in any
transactions involving Company securities, including gifts and
option exercises, without first obtaining pre-clearance of the
transaction from our Chief People and Legal Officer or Assistant
Secretary. Generally, trading is only permitted during announced
trading periods. Employees subject to trading restrictions,
including officers, may enter into a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), that would allow trades outside a trading period.
Our policy on Rule 10b5-1 trading plans requires (i) plans to be
entered into during an open trading window, (ii) trades to occur
during a trading window unless the plan uses a limit price or is
used to pay taxes on equity vesting outside a window, (iii) a
60-day wait before the first trade can occur (unless the trade is
to cover taxes on equity vesting before then), and (iv) Company
approval. Plans can be amended only during an open trading window
and cannot be terminated except in extraordinary circumstances,
subject in both cases to approval by our Chief People and Legal
Officer.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 48
Back to
Contents
We also have an anti-hedging policy that prohibits employees from
engaging in any transaction that is designed or intended to hedge
or otherwise limit exposure to decreases in the market value of
Company stock, and an anti-pledging policy that prohibits officers
from pledging Company securities.
RECOUPMENT POLICY, CLAWBACKS AND OTHER
POST-EMPLOYMENT PROVISIONS
Our recoupment policy applies to current and former officers
subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act and includes a three-year
lookback for incentive compensation from the time of a material
restatement if a recoupment is required. Under the policy, in the
event of a material restatement of our consolidated financial
statements (other than any restatement required pursuant to a
change in the applicable accounting rules), our Compensation and
Talent Management Committee may, to the extent permitted by law and
to the extent it determines that it is in our best interest to do
so, require reimbursement or payment to us of the excess amount of
any incentive compensation received by the officer during the three
fiscal years preceding the date on which the Company determines, or
reasonably should have determined, such restatement is required,
over the amount of incentive compensation that would have been
received by the officer had it been based on the restated financial
statements or restated performance measure results.
The Compensation and Talent Management Committee believes that the
Company’s clawback policy is in keeping with good standards of
corporate governance and mitigates the potential for excessive risk
taking by Company executives.
Additionally, our equity award agreements contain certain
post-employment restrictive covenants, including two-year
non-competition and non-solicitation covenants, that give the
Company the right, in the event of a breach, to recoup the gain on
any shares of Company common stock acquired during the
two years before the date of the officer’s retirement or other
termination of employment.
DEDUCTIBILITY
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 enacted significant changes to
Section 162(m) of the Code, including the repeal of the
“performance-based” compensation exemption and the expansion of the
definition of “covered employees”. As a result of these changes, we
expect that compensation to NEOs in excess of $1 million will not
be deductible by the Company unless it qualifies for limited
transition relief that applies to certain arrangements in place as
of November 2, 2017, that have not been materially modified.
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION | FY2021 PROXY
STATEMENT 49
Back to
Contents
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth the total compensation of each of
the NEOs for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021, 2020 and
2019.
Name and
Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary(1)
($)
|
Bonus(2)
($)
|
Stock
Awards(3)
($)
|
Option
Awards(4)
($)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(5)
($)
|
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(6)
($)
|
All Other
Compensation(7)
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Blake D. Moret
President & Chief
Executive Officer
|
2021
|
|
1,111,502
|
|
0
|
|
4,551,639
|
|
1,952,544
|
|
2,266,600
|
|
3,572,868
|
|
128,317
|
|
13,583,470
|
2020
|
|
1,030,769
|
|
0
|
|
3,133,316
|
|
2,520,180
|
|
0
|
|
2,595,298
|
|
93,092
|
|
9,372,656
|
2019
|
|
1,123,103
|
|
0
|
|
2,806,825
|
|
2,251,076
|
|
1,105,600
|
|
4,344,133
|
|
79,428
|
|
11,710,165
|
Nicholas C.
Gangestad(8)
Senior Vice President
& Chief Financial Officer
|
2021
|
|
472,031
|
|