ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is organized as follows:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Overview. A discussion of our business and other highlights affecting the company to provide context for the remainder of this MD&A.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. A discussion of accounting policies and estimates that we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Results of Operations. An analysis of our financial results comparing fiscal year 2019 to fiscal year 2018 and fiscal year 2018 to fiscal year 2017. A discussion of the results of operations is followed by a more detailed discussion of the results of operations by segment.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources. An analysis of changes in our cash flows and a discussion of our liquidity and financial condition.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Contractual and Other Obligations. An overview of contractual obligations, retirement and post-retirement benefit plan contributions, cost-saving plans, uncertain tax positions and off-balance sheet arrangements.
|
The discussion of financial condition and results of our operations that follows provides information that will assist the reader in understanding our Consolidated Financial Statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial statements from year to year, and the primary factors that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles, policies and estimates affect our Consolidated Financial Statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this document.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
OVERVIEW
We are a leading global provider of personal computing and other access devices, imaging and printing products, and related technologies, solutions, and services. We sell to individual consumers, SMBs and large enterprises, including customers in the government, health, and education sectors. We have three reportable segments: Personal Systems, Printing and Corporate Investments. The Personal Systems segment offers commercial and consumer desktop and notebook PCs, workstations, thin clients, commercial mobility devices, retail POS systems, displays and other related accessories, software, support, and services. The Printing segment provides consumer and commercial printer hardware, supplies, solutions and services, as well as scanning devices. Corporate Investments include HP Labs and certain business incubation and investment projects.
|
|
|
|
•
|
In Personal Systems, our strategic focus is on profitable growth through market segmentation with respect to enhanced innovation in multi-operating systems, multi-architecture, geography, customer segments and other key attributes. Additionally, we are investing in end point services and solutions. We are focused on services including DaaS as the market begins to shift to contractual solutions. We believe that we are well positioned due to our competitive product lineup.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
In Printing, our strategic focus is on Contractual solutions and Graphics, as well as expanding our footprint in the 3D printing and digital manufacturing marketplace. In Contractual solutions we have a continued focus on Managed Print Services and Instant Ink. In Graphics, we are focused on innovations such as our Indigo and Latex product offerings.
|
We continue to experience challenges that are representative of trends and uncertainties that may affect our business and results of operations. One set of challenges relates to dynamic market trends, such as forecasted declining PC Client markets and home printing markets. A second set of challenges relates to changes in the competitive landscape. Our primary competitors are exerting competitive pressure in targeted areas and are entering new markets, our emerging competitors are introducing new technologies and business models, and our alliance partners in some businesses are increasingly becoming our competitors in others. A third set of challenges relates to business model changes and our go-to-market execution in an evolving distribution and reseller landscape, with increasing online and omnichannel presence. Additional challenges we face at the segment level are set forth below.
|
|
|
|
•
|
In Personal Systems, we face challenges with industry component availability and a competitive pricing environment.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
In Printing, a competitive pricing environment, including from non-original supplies (which includes imitation, refill or remanufactured alternatives), and a weakened market in certain geographies with associated pricing sensitivity of our customers present challenges. We also face challenges in Printing due to our multi-tier distribution network, primarily in EMEA, including limiting grey marketing and the potential misuse of pricing programs. We also obtain many Printing components from single sources due to technology, availability, price, quality or other considerations. For instance, we source the majority of our A4 and a portion of our A3 portfolio of laser printer engines and laser toner cartridges from Canon. Any decision by either party to not renew our agreement with Canon or to limit or reduce the scope of the agreement could adversely affect our net revenue from LaserJet products; however, we have a long-standing business relationship with Canon and anticipate renewal of this agreement.
|
Our business and financial performance also depend significantly on worldwide economic conditions. Accordingly, we face global macroeconomic challenges, tariff-driven headwinds, uncertainty in the markets, volatility in exchange rates, weaker macroeconomic conditions and evolving dynamics in the global trade environment. The full impact of these and other global macroeconomic challenges on our business cannot be known at this time.
To address these challenges, we continue to pursue innovation with a view towards developing new products and services aligned with generating market demand and meeting the needs of our customers and partners. In addition, we continue to work on improving our operations and adapting our business models, with a particular focus on enhancing our end-to-end processes, analytics and efficiencies. We also continue to work on optimizing our sales coverage models, aligning our sales incentives with our strategic goals, improving channel execution and inventory management, strengthening our capabilities in our areas of strategic focus, strengthening our pricing discipline, and developing and capitalizing on market opportunities.
Specifically, in October 2019, we announced cost-reduction and operational efficiency initiatives intended to simplify the way we work, move closer to our customers and facilitate specific investment in our business. These efforts include transforming our operating model to integrate our sales force into a single commercial organization and reducing structural costs across the company through our restructuring plan approved in September 2019 (the “Fiscal 2020 Plan”). We expect to invest some of the savings from these efforts across our businesses, including investing to build our digital capabilities. Over time, we expect these investments will make us more efficient and allow us to advance our positions in Personal Systems and Printing, while also disrupting new industries where we see attractive medium to long-term growth opportunities. However, the rate at which we are able to invest in our business and the returns that we are able to achieve from these investments will be
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
affected by many factors, including the efforts to address the execution, industry and macroeconomic challenges facing our business as discussed above. As a result, we may experience delays in the anticipated timing of activities related to these efforts, and the anticipated benefits of these efforts may not materialize.
We typically experience higher net revenues in our fourth quarter compared to other quarters in our fiscal year due in part to seasonal holiday demand. Historical seasonal patterns should not be considered reliable indicators of our future net revenues or financial performance.
For a further discussion of trends, uncertainties and other factors that could impact our operating results, see the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
General
The Consolidated Financial Statements of HP are prepared in accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), which require management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net revenue and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying amount of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the Audit Committee of HP’s Board of Directors. Management believes that the accounting estimates employed and the resulting amounts are reasonable; however, actual results may differ from these estimates. Making estimates and judgments about future events is inherently unpredictable and is subject to significant uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. Should any of these estimates and assumptions change or prove to have been incorrect, it could have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
A summary of significant accounting policies is included in Note 1, “Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference. An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, if different estimates reasonably could have been used, or if changes in the estimate that are reasonably possible could materially impact the financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect the significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue depicting the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we are expected to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. We evaluate customers’ ability to pay based on various factors like historical payment experience, financial metrics and customer credit scores.
We enter into contracts to sell our products and services, and while many of our sales contracts contain standard terms and conditions, there are contracts which contain non-standard terms and conditions. Further, many of our arrangements include multiple performance obligations. As a result, significant contract interpretation may be required to determine the appropriate accounting, including the identification of performance obligations that are distinct, the allocation of the transaction price among performance obligations in the arrangement and the timing of transfer of control of promised goods or services for each of those performance obligations.
We evaluate each performance obligation in an arrangement to determine whether it represents a distinct good or services. A performance obligation constitutes distinct goods or services when the customer can benefit from the goods or services either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer and the performance obligation is distinct within the context of the contract.
Transaction price is the amount of consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for transferring goods or services to the customer. If the transaction price includes a variable amount, we estimate the amount using either the expected value or most likely amount method. We reduce the transaction price at the time of revenue recognition for customer and distributor programs and incentive offerings, rebates, promotions, other volume-based incentives and expected returns. We use estimates to determine the expected variable consideration for such programs based on historical experience, expected consumer behavior and market conditions.
When a sales arrangement contains multiple performance obligations, such as hardware and/or services, we allocate revenue to each performance obligation in proportion to their selling price. The selling price for each performance obligation is based on its standalone selling price (“SSP”). We establish SSP using the price charged for a performance obligation when sold
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
separately (“observable price”) and, in some instances, using the price established by management having the relevant authority. When observable price is not available, we establish SSP based on management’s judgment considering internal factors such as margin objectives, pricing practices and controls, customer segment pricing strategies and the product life-cycle. Consideration is also given to market conditions such as competitor pricing strategies and technology industry life cycles. We may modify or develop new go-to-market practices in the future, which may result in changes in selling prices, impacting standalone selling price determination applying the aforementioned management judgments and estimates. This may change the pattern and timing of revenue recognition for identical arrangements executed in future periods but will not change the total revenue recognized for any given arrangement. In most arrangements with multiple performance obligations, the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation at the inception of the arrangement based on their relative selling price.
Revenue is recognized when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied by transferring control of a promised good or service to a customer. We generally invoice the customer upon delivery of the goods or services and the payments are due as per contract terms. For fixed price support or maintenance and other service contracts that are in the nature of stand-ready obligations, payments are generally received in advance from customers and revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the duration of the contract. In instances when revenue is derived from sales of third-party vendor products or services, we record revenue on a gross basis when we are a principal in the transaction and on a net basis when we are acting as an agent between the customer and the vendor. We consider several factors to determine whether we are acting as a principal or an agent, most notably whether we are the primary obligor to the customer, have established our own pricing and have inventory and credit risks.
Warranty
We accrue the estimated cost of product warranties at the time we recognize revenue. We evaluate our warranty obligations on a product group basis. Our standard product warranty terms generally include post-sales support and repairs or replacement of a product at no additional charge for a specified period. While we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of our component suppliers, we base our estimated warranty obligation on contractual warranty terms, repair costs, product call rates, average cost per call, current period product shipments and ongoing product failure rates, as well as specific product class failure outside of our baseline experience. Warranty terms generally range from 90 days to three years for parts, labor and onsite services, depending upon the product. Over the last three fiscal years, the annual warranty expense and actual warranty costs have averaged approximately 1.8% of annual net revenue.
Restructuring and Other Charges
We have engaged in restructuring actions which require management to estimate the timing and amount of severance and other employee separation costs for workforce reduction and enhanced early retirement programs, fair value of assets made redundant or obsolete, and the fair value of lease cancellation and other exit costs. We accrue for severance and other employee separation costs under these actions when it is probable that benefits will be paid and the amount is reasonably estimable. The rates used in determining severance accruals are based on existing plans, historical experiences and negotiated settlements. Other charges include non-recurring costs that are distinct from ongoing operational costs incurred in connection with the Separation or information technology rationalization efforts. For a full description of our restructuring actions, refer to our discussions of restructuring in “Results of Operations” below and in Note 3, “Restructuring and Other Charges” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefits
Our pension and other post-retirement benefit costs and obligations depend on various assumptions. Our major assumptions relate primarily to discount rates, mortality rates, expected increases in compensation levels and the expected long-term return on plan assets. The discount rate assumption is based on current investment yields of high-quality fixed-income securities with maturities similar to the expected benefits payment period. Mortality rates help predict the expected life of plan participants and are based on a historical demographic study of the plan. The expected increase in the compensation levels assumption reflects our long-term actual experience and future expectations. The expected long-term return on plan assets is determined based on asset allocations, historical portfolio results, historical asset correlations and management’s expected returns for each asset class. We evaluate our expected return assumptions annually including reviewing current capital market assumptions to assess the reasonableness of the expected long-term return on plan assets. We update the expected long-term return on assets when we observe a sufficient level of evidence that would suggest the long-term expected return has changed. In any fiscal year, significant differences may arise between the actual return and the expected long-term return on plan assets. Historically, differences between the actual return and expected long-term return on plan assets have resulted from changes in target or actual asset allocation, short-term performance relative to expected long-term performance, and to a lesser extent, differences between target and actual investment allocations, the timing of benefit payments compared to expectations, and the use of derivatives intended to effect asset allocation changes or hedge certain investment or liability exposures. For the
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
recognition of net periodic benefit cost, the calculation of the expected long-term return on plan assets uses the fair value of plan assets as of the beginning of the fiscal year unless updated as a result of interim re-measurement.
Our major assumptions vary by plan, and the weighted-average rates used are set forth in Note 4, “Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference. The following table provides the impact a change of 25 basis points in each of the weighted-average assumptions of the discount rate, expected increase in compensation levels and expected long-term return on plan assets would have had on our net periodic benefit cost for fiscal year 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Periodic
Benefit Cost
in millions
|
|
Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
Expected increase in compensation levels
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets
|
$
|
28
|
|
Taxes on Earnings
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) made significant changes to the U.S. tax law. The TCJA lowered our U.S. statutory federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, while also imposing a one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings.
In December 2017, the SEC staff issued SAB No. 118, which allows registrants to record provisional amounts during a one year “measurement period”. In January 2019, we completed our accounting for the tax effects of the TCJA with no material changes to the provisional amounts recorded during the measurement period.
In January 2018, the FASB released guidance on the accounting for tax on the Global Minimum Tax provisions of TCJA. The Global Minimum Tax provisions impose a tax on foreign income in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. We have elected to treat the Global Minimum Tax inclusions as period costs.
As a result of certain employment actions and capital investments we have undertaken, income from manufacturing activities in certain jurisdictions is subject to reduced tax rates and, in some cases, is wholly exempt from taxes for fiscal years through 2027.
Material changes in our estimates of cash, working capital and long-term investment requirements in the various jurisdictions in which we do business could impact how future earnings are repatriated to the United States, and our related future effective tax rate. The effects of the TCJA related to these policies are referenced and discussed in detail in Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
We calculate our current and deferred tax provisions based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from the final positions reflected in our income tax returns. We adjust our current and deferred tax provisions based on income tax returns which are generally filed in the third or fourth quarters of the subsequent fiscal year.
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which we expect the differences to reverse.
We record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that we are more likely than not to realize. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, we consider future market growth, forecasted earnings, future taxable income, the mix of earnings in the jurisdictions in which we operate and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. In the event we were to determine that it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all or part of our deferred tax assets in the future, we would increase the valuation allowance and recognize a corresponding charge to earnings or other comprehensive income in the period in which we make such a determination. Likewise, if we later determine that we are more likely than not to realize the deferred tax assets, we would reverse the applicable portion of the previously recognized valuation allowance. In order for us to realize our deferred tax assets, we must be able to generate sufficient taxable income in the jurisdictions in which the deferred tax assets are located.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and approximately 58 other countries, and we are subject to routine corporate income tax audits in many of these jurisdictions. We believe that positions taken on our tax returns are fully supported, but tax authorities may challenge these positions, which may not be fully sustained on examination by the relevant tax authorities. Accordingly, our income tax provision includes amounts intended to satisfy assessments that may result from these challenges. Determining the income tax provision for these potential assessments and recording the related effects
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
requires management judgments and estimates. The amounts ultimately paid on resolution of an audit could be materially different from the amounts previously included in our income tax provision and, therefore, could have a material impact on our income tax provision, net income and cash flows. Our accrual for uncertain tax positions is attributable primarily to uncertainties concerning the tax treatment of our domestic operations, including the allocation of income among different jurisdictions, intercompany transactions, pension and related interest. For a further discussion on taxes on earnings, refer to Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Inventory
We state our inventory at the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis. We make adjustments to reduce the cost of inventory to its net realizable value at the product group level for estimated excess or obsolescence. Factors influencing these adjustments include changes in demand, technological changes, product life cycle and development plans, component cost trends, product pricing, physical deterioration and quality issues.
Business Combinations
We allocate the fair value of purchase consideration to the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in the acquiree generally based on their fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair value of these assets acquired, liabilities assumed and non-controlling interests in the acquiree is recorded as goodwill and may involve engaging independent third-parties to perform an appraisal. When determining the fair values of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in the acquiree, management makes significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets.
Critical estimates in valuing intangible assets include, but are not limited to, expected future cash flows, which includes consideration of future growth rates and margins, attrition rates, future changes in technology and brand awareness, loyalty and position, and discount rates. Fair value estimates are based on the assumptions management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. Amounts recorded in a business combination may change during the measurement period, which is a period not to exceed one year from the date of acquisition, as additional information about conditions existing at the acquisition date becomes available.
Goodwill
We review goodwill for impairment annually during our fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. We can elect to perform a qualitative assessment to test a reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment or perform a quantitative impairment test. Based on a qualitative assessment, if we determine that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than 50 percent) to be less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test will be performed.
In the quantitative impairment test, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount with the fair values derived most significantly from the income approach, and to a lesser extent, the market approach. Under the income approach, we estimate the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. We base cash flow projections on management’s estimates of revenue growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions. We base the discount rate on the weighted-average cost of capital adjusted for the relevant risk associated with business-specific characteristics and the uncertainty related to the reporting unit’s ability to execute on the projected cash flows. Under the market approach, we estimate fair value based on market multiples of revenue and earnings derived from comparable publicly-traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting unit. We weight the fair value derived from the market approach depending on the level of comparability of these publicly-traded companies to the reporting unit. When market comparables are not meaningful or not available, we estimate the fair value of a reporting unit using only the income approach.
If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount of the net assets assigned to that reporting unit, goodwill is not impaired. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, goodwill is impaired and the excess of the reporting unit’s carrying value over the fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.
Our annual goodwill impairment analysis, performed using the qualitative assessment option as of the first day of the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019, resulted in a conclusion that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values. As a result, we concluded that a quantitative impairment test was not necessary.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
We use derivative instruments to manage a variety of risks, including risks related to foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and existing assets and liabilities. We use forwards, swaps and at times, options to hedge certain foreign currency, interest rate and, return on certain investments exposures. We do not use derivative instruments for speculative purposes. As of October 31, 2019, the gross notional value of our derivative portfolio was $24 billion. Assets and liabilities related to derivative instruments are measured at fair value and were $392 million and $166 million, respectively, as of October 31, 2019.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Fair value is the price we would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In the absence of active markets for the identical assets or liabilities, such measurements involve developing assumptions based on market observable data and, in the absence of such data, internal information that is consistent with what market participants would use in a hypothetical transaction that occurs at the measurement date. The determination of fair value often involves significant judgments about assumptions such as determining an appropriate discount rate that factors in both risk and liquidity premiums, identifying the similarities and differences in market transactions, weighting those differences accordingly and then making the appropriate adjustments to those market transactions to reflect the risks specific to the asset or liability being valued. We generally use industry standard valuation models to measure the fair value of our derivative positions. When prices in active markets are not available for the identical asset or liability, we use industry standard valuation models to measure fair value. Where applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to present value using market-based observable inputs, including interest rate curves, HP and counterparty credit risk, foreign currency exchange rates, and forward and spot prices.
For a further discussion on fair value measurements and derivative instruments, refer to Note 9, “Fair Value” and Note 10, “Financial Instruments”, respectively, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Loss Contingencies
We are involved in various lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings including those consisting of intellectual property (“IP”), commercial, securities, employment, employee benefits and environmental matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. We record a liability when we believe that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine both the probability of having incurred a liability and the estimated amount of the liability. We review these matters at least quarterly and adjust these liabilities to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other updated information and events, pertaining to a particular case. Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, we share responsibility with Hewlett Packard Enterprise for certain matters, as discussed in Note 14, “Litigation and Contingencies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise has agreed to indemnify us in whole or in part with respect to certain matters. Based on our experience, we believe that any damage amounts claimed in the specific litigation and contingencies matters further discussed in Note 14, “Litigation and Contingencies”, are not a meaningful indicator of HP’s potential liability. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. However, we believe we have valid defenses with respect to legal matters pending against us. Nevertheless, cash flows or results of operations could be materially affected in any particular period by the resolution of one or more of these contingencies. We believe we have recorded adequate provisions for any such matters and, as of October 31, 2019, it was not reasonably possible that a material loss had been incurred in excess of the amounts recognized in our financial statements.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
For a summary of recent accounting pronouncements applicable to our consolidated financial statements see Note 1, “Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenue from our international operations has historically represented, and we expect will continue to represent, a majority of our overall net revenue. As a result, our net revenue growth has been impacted, and we expect it will continue to be impacted, by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. In order to provide a framework for assessing performance excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, we supplement the year-over-year percentage change in net revenue with the year-over-year percentage change in net revenue on a constant currency basis, which excludes the effect of foreign currency exchange fluctuations calculated by translating current period revenues using monthly average exchange rates from the comparative period and hedging activities from the prior-year period and does not adjust for any repricing or demand impacts from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. This information is provided so that net revenue can be viewed with and without the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, which is consistent with how management evaluates our net revenue results and trends, as management does not believe that the excluded items are reflective of ongoing operating results. The constant currency measures are provided in addition to, and not as a substitute for, the year-over-year percentage change in net revenue on a GAAP basis. Other companies may calculate and define similarly labeled items differently, which may limit the usefulness of this measure for comparative purposes.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Results of operations in dollars and as a percentage of net revenue were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
% of Net Revenue
|
|
Dollars
|
|
% of Net Revenue
|
|
Dollars
|
|
% of Net Revenue
|
|
|
Dollars in millions
|
|
Net revenue
|
$
|
58,756
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
58,472
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
52,056
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
47,586
|
|
|
81.0
|
%
|
|
47,803
|
|
|
81.8
|
%
|
|
42,478
|
|
|
81.6
|
%
|
|
Gross profit
|
11,170
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
|
10,669
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
9,578
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
Research and development
|
1,499
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
5,368
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
5,099
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
4,532
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
275
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
132
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
362
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
Acquisition-related charges
|
35
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
123
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
125
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
116
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
80
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
3,877
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
3,831
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
(1,354
|
)
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
(818
|
)
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
Earnings before taxes
|
2,523
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
3,013
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
3,276
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
Benefit from (provision for) taxes
|
629
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
Net earnings
|
$
|
3,152
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,327
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,526
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
Net Revenue
In fiscal year 2019, total net revenue increased 0.5% (increased 2.0% on a constant currency basis) as compared to the prior-year period. Net revenue from the United States remained flat at $20.6 billion and net revenue from outside of the United States increased 0.7% to $38.2 billion. The increase in net revenue was primarily driven by growth in Notebooks, Desktops and Workstations in Personal Systems, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts and a decline in Printing Supplies.
In fiscal year 2018, total net revenue increased 12.3% (increased 10.1% on a constant currency basis) as compared to the prior-year period. Net revenue from the United States increased 6.6% to $20.6 billion and net revenue from outside of the United States increased 15.7% to $37.9 billion. The increase in net revenue was primarily driven by growth in Notebooks, Desktops, Supplies, Commercial Printing Hardware revenue and favorable foreign currency impacts.
A detailed discussion of the factors contributing to the changes in segment net revenue is included under “Segment Information” below.
Gross Margin
Our gross margin was 19.0% for fiscal year 2019 compared with 18.2% for fiscal year 2018. The increase was primarily due to higher rate in Personal Systems driven by lower supply chain costs.
Our gross margin was 18.2% for fiscal year 2018 compared with 18.4% for fiscal year 2017. The decrease was primarily due to higher Commercial Hardware unit placements in Printing and an increase in commodity and logistics costs in Personal Systems, partially offset by higher pricing in Personal Systems and favorable foreign currency impacts.
A detailed discussion of the factors contributing to the changes in segment gross margins is included under “Segment Information” below.
Operating Expenses
Research and Development (“R&D”)
R&D expense increased 7% in fiscal year 2019 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to continuing investments in innovation and key growth initiatives.
R&D expense increased 18% in fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to continuing investment in Printing, including the acquisition of Samsung’s printer business.
Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”)
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
SG&A expense increased 5% in fiscal year 2019 as compared to the prior-year period, primarily driven by increased investments in key growth initiatives and go-to-market in Personal Systems and investment in digital infrastructure.
SG&A expense increased 13% in fiscal year 2018 as compared to the prior-year period, primarily driven by incremental go-to-market investments to support revenue growth, including the acquisition of Samsung’s printer business.
Restructuring and other Charges
Restructuring and other charges increased by $143 million in fiscal year 2019 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to charges from the Fiscal 2020 Plan and the restructuring plan approved in October 2016 (the “Fiscal 2017 Plan”), which was later amended in May 2018.
Restructuring and other charges decreased by $230 million in fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to lower charges from the Fiscal 2017 Plan.
Acquisition-related Charges
Acquisition-related charges for the fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 relate primarily to third-party professional and legal fees, and integration-related costs, as well as fair value adjustments of certain acquired assets such as inventory.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization expense increased by $36 million in fiscal year 2019 compared to the prior-year period, due to intangible assets resulting primarily from the acquisition of the Apogee group.
Amortization expense increased by $79 million in fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior-year period, due to intangible assets resulting primarily from the acquisition of Samsung’s printer business.
Interest and Other, Net
Interest and other, net expense increased by $536 million in fiscal year 2019 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to tax indemnifications related to the termination of the tax matters agreement (“TMA”) with Hewlett Packard Enterprise during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019.
Interest and other, net expense increased by $726 million in fiscal year 2018 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to the reversal of indemnification receivables from Hewlett Packard Enterprise pertaining to various income tax audit settlements, and loss on extinguishment of debt.
Benefit from (Provision for) Taxes
Our effective tax rates were (24.9%), (76.8%) and 22.9% in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. In fiscal year 2019, our effective tax rate generally differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% primarily due to the resolution of various audits, changes in valuation allowances, and impacts of U.S. tax reform. In fiscal year 2018, our effective tax rate generally differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 23.3% primarily due to transitional impacts of U.S. tax reform and resolution of various audits and tax litigation. In fiscal year 2017, our effective tax rate generally differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to favorable tax rates associated with certain earnings in lower-tax jurisdictions throughout the world. The jurisdictions with favorable tax rates that had the most significant impact on our effective tax rate in the periods presented were Puerto Rico, Singapore, China, Malaysia and Ireland. Additionally, the overall effective tax rate in fiscal year 2017 was impacted by adjustments to valuation allowances and state income taxes.
For a reconciliation of our effective tax rate to the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21%, 23.3% and 35% in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and further explanation of our provision for income taxes, see Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
In fiscal year 2019, we recorded $1.3 billion of net income tax benefit related to discrete items in the provision for taxes. This amount includes tax benefits related to audit settlements of $1.0 billion, $75 million due to ability to utilize tax attributes, $57 million of restructuring benefits and net valuation allowance releases of $94 million. We also recorded benefits of $78 million related to U.S. tax reform as a result of new guidance issued by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). These benefits were partially offset by uncertain tax position charges of $51 million. In fiscal year 2019, in addition to the discrete items mentioned above, we recorded excess tax benefits of $20 million associated with stock options, restricted stock units and performance-adjusted restricted stock units.
In fiscal year 2018, we recorded $2.8 billion of net income tax benefit related to discrete items in the provision for taxes which include impacts of the TCJA. As discussed in the Note 6 “Taxes on Earnings” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report, we had not yet completed our analysis of the full impact of the TCJA. However, as of October 31, 2018, we recorded a provisional tax benefit of $760 million related to $5.6 billion net benefit for the decrease in our deferred tax liability on unremitted foreign earnings, partially offset by $3.3 billion net expense for the deemed repatriation tax payable in installments over eight years, a $1.2 billion net expense for the remeasurement of our deferred assets and liabilities to the new U.S. statutory tax rate and a $317 million net expense related to realization on U.S. deferred taxes that are expected to be
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
realized at a lower rate. Fiscal year 2018 also included tax benefits related to audit settlements of $1.5 billion and valuation allowance releases of $601 million pertaining to a change in our ability to utilize certain foreign and U.S. deferred tax assets due to a change in our geographic earnings mix. These benefits were partially offset by other net tax charges of $34 million. In fiscal year 2018, in addition to the discrete items mentioned above, we recorded excess tax benefits of $42 million associated with stock options, restricted stock units and performance-adjusted restricted stock units.
In fiscal year 2017, we recorded $72 million of net income tax benefit related to discrete items in the provision for taxes. These amounts primarily include tax benefits of $84 million related to restructuring and other charges, $12 million related to U.S. federal provision to return adjustments, $45 million related to Samsung acquisition-related charges, and $13 million of other net tax benefits. In addition, we recorded tax charges of $11 million related to changes in state valuation allowances, $22 million of state provision to return adjustments, and $49 million related to uncertain tax positions.
Segment Information
A description of the products and services for each segment can be found in Note 2, “Segment Information,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference. Future changes to this organizational structure may result in changes to the segments disclosed.
Realignment
Effective at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal year 2019, we implemented an organizational change to align our business unit financial reporting more closely with our current business structure. The organizational change resulted in the transfer of certain Samsung-branded product categories from Commercial to Consumer within the Printing segment. We reflected this change to our business unit information in prior reporting periods on an as-if basis. The reporting change had no impact to previously reported segment net revenue, consolidated net revenue, earnings from operations, net earnings or net earnings per share (“EPS”).
Personal Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Dollars in millions
|
|
Net revenue
|
$
|
38,694
|
|
|
$
|
37,661
|
|
|
$
|
33,321
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
$
|
1,898
|
|
|
$
|
1,402
|
|
|
$
|
1,206
|
|
|
Earnings from operations as a % of net revenue
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
The components of net revenue and the weighted net revenue change by business unit were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue
|
|
Weighted Net Revenue Change
Percentage Points (1)
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notebooks
|
$
|
22,928
|
|
|
$
|
22,547
|
|
|
$
|
19,782
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
Desktops
|
12,046
|
|
|
11,567
|
|
|
10,298
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
Workstations
|
2,389
|
|
|
2,246
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
Other
|
1,331
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
Total Personal Systems
|
$
|
38,694
|
|
|
$
|
37,661
|
|
|
$
|
33,321
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
(1) Weighted Net Revenue Change Percentage Points measures contribution of each business unit towards overall segment revenue growth. It is calculated by dividing the change in revenue of each business unit from the prior-year period by total segment revenue for the prior-year period.
Fiscal Year 2019 compared with Fiscal Year 2018
Personal Systems net revenue increased 2.7% (increased 4.9% on a constant currency basis) in fiscal year 2019 as compared to the prior-year period. The net revenue increase was primarily due to growth in Notebooks, Desktops and Workstations, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts. The net revenue increase was driven by a 2.2% increase in unit volume and 0.5% increase in average selling prices (“ASPs”) as compared to the prior-year period. The increase in unit volume was primarily due to growth in Notebooks and Desktops. The increase in ASPs was primarily due to positive mix shifts and higher pricing, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts. Commercial revenue increased 7.0% primarily
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
driven by higher unit volume partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts, and consumer revenue decreased by 5.5% primarily driven by lower unit volume, respectively, in fiscal year 2019 as compared to the prior-year period.
Net revenue increased 1.7% in Notebooks, 4.1% in Desktops and 6.4% in Workstations in fiscal year 2019 as compared to the prior-year period.
Personal Systems earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue increased by 1.2 percentage points in fiscal year 2019 as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to in an increase in gross margin, partially offset by an increase in operating expenses. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to lower supply chain costs and higher ASPs. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to increased investments in key growth initiatives and go-to-market.
Fiscal Year 2018 compared with Fiscal Year 2017
Personal Systems net revenue increased 13.0% (increased 10.5% on a constant currency basis) in fiscal year 2018 as compared to the prior-year period. The net revenue increase was primarily due to growth in Notebooks and Desktops and favorable foreign currency impacts. The net revenue increase was driven by a 6.6% increase in unit volume and 6.0% increase in ASPs as compared to the prior-year period. The increase in unit volume was primarily due to growth in Notebooks and Desktops. The increase in ASPs was primarily due to higher pricing driven by increased commodity and logistics costs, favorable foreign currency impacts and positive mix shifts. Consumer and Commercial revenue increased 11% and 14%, respectively, in fiscal year 2018 as compared to the prior-year period, driven by growth in Notebooks, Desktops and Workstations as a result of higher unit volume combined with higher ASPs.
Net revenue increased 14% in Notebooks, 12% in Desktops and 10% in Workstations in fiscal year 2018 as compared to the prior-year period.
Personal Systems earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue increased by 0.1 percentage points in fiscal year 2018 as compared to the prior-year period. The increase was primarily due to higher ASPs, partially offset by an increase in commodity and logistics costs.
Printing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Dollars in millions
|
|
Net revenue
|
$
|
20,066
|
|
|
$
|
20,805
|
|
|
$
|
18,728
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
$
|
3,202
|
|
|
$
|
3,314
|
|
|
$
|
3,142
|
|
|
Earnings from operations as a % of net revenue
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
The components of the net revenue and weighted net revenue change by business unit were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue
|
|
Weighted Net Revenue Change Percentage Points(1)
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplies
|
$
|
12,921
|
|
|
$
|
13,575
|
|
|
$
|
12,524
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
Commercial Hardware
|
4,612
|
|
|
4,514
|
|
|
3,792
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
Consumer Hardware
|
2,533
|
|
|
2,716
|
|
|
2,412
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
Total Printing
|
$
|
20,066
|
|
|
$
|
20,805
|
|
|
$
|
18,728
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
11.1
|
|
(1) Weighted Net Revenue Change Percentage Points measures the contribution of each business unit towards overall segment revenue growth. It is calculated by dividing the change in revenue of each business unit from the prior period by total segment revenue for the prior-year period.
Fiscal Year 2019 compared with Fiscal Year 2018
Printing net revenue decreased 3.6% (decreased 3.0% on a constant currency basis) for fiscal year 2019 as compared to prior-year period. The decline in net revenue was primarily driven by a decline in Supplies, Consumer Hardware revenue and unfavorable foreign currency impacts, partially offset by an increase in Commercial Hardware revenue. Net revenue for Supplies decreased 4.8% as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to demand weakness. Printer unit volume
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
decreased 4.8% compared to the prior-year period. The decrease in printer unit volume was driven by unit decrease in Consumer Hardware.
Net revenue for Commercial Hardware increased 2.2% as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to the acquisition of the Apogee group.
Net revenue for Consumer Hardware decreased 6.7% as compared to the prior-year period due to a 5.4% decrease in printer unit volume and 1.7% decrease in ASPs. The unit volume decrease was driven by InkJet Home Consumer business and LaserJet Home business. The decrease in ASPs was primarily due to unfavorable foreign currency impacts.
Printing earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue increased by 0.1 percentage points for the fiscal year 2019 as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to higher gross margin. The gross margin increased primarily due to rate improvement in Commercial Hardware partially offset by lower Supplies revenue.
Fiscal Year 2018 compared with Fiscal Year 2017
Printing net revenue increased 11.1% (increased 9.5% on a constant currency basis) for fiscal year 2018 as compared to prior-year period. The increase in net revenue was primarily driven by the increase in Supplies and Hardware revenue and favorable foreign currency impacts. Net revenue for Supplies increased 8.4% as compared to the prior-year period, including the acquisition of Samsung’s printer business. Printer unit volume increased 12.7% while ASPs increased 1.7% as compared to the prior-year period. The increase in Printer unit volume was primarily driven by unit increases in Commercial and Consumer Hardware, including the Samsung-branded printers. Printer ASPs increased primarily due to favorable foreign currency impacts, partially offset by the dilution impact from Samsung-branded low-end A4 products.
Net revenue for Commercial Hardware increased 19.0% as compared to the prior-year period, including revenue from Samsung-branded printers, LaserJet and PageWide printers. The unit volume increased by 39.6% while the ASPs decreased by 17.0%. The unit volume increased primarily due to Samsung-branded printers. The decrease in ASPs was primarily due to the dilution impact from Samsung-branded low-end A4 products.
Net revenue for Consumer Hardware increased 12.6% as compared to the prior-year period due to a 9.3% increase in printer unit volume and a 3.4% increase in ASPs. The unit volume increase was driven by Samsung-branded printers, InkJet and LaserJet Home business. The increase in ASPs was primarily due to favorable foreign currency impacts.
Printing earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue decreased by 0.9 percentage points for the fiscal year 2018 as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to an increase in operating expenses and lower gross margin. The gross margin decreased primarily due to lower Supplies mix and the dilution impact of Samsung-branded low-end products, partially offset by favorable foreign currency impacts and operational improvements. Operating expenses increased primarily driven by the acquisition of Samsung’s printer business and increases in investments in key growth initiatives and go-to-market.
Corporate Investments
The loss from operations in Corporate Investments for the fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 was primarily due to expenses associated with HP Labs and our incubation and investment projects.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We use cash generated by operations as our primary source of liquidity. We believe that internally generated cash flows are generally sufficient to support our operating businesses, capital expenditures, acquisitions, restructuring activities, maturing debt, income tax payments and the payment of stockholder dividends, in addition to investments and share repurchases. We are able to supplement this short-term liquidity, if necessary, with broad access to capital markets and credit facilities made available by various domestic and foreign financial institutions. While our access to capital markets may be constrained and our cost of borrowing may increase under certain business, market and economic conditions, our access to a variety of funding sources to meet our liquidity needs is designed to facilitate continued access to capital resources under all such conditions. Our liquidity is subject to various risks including the risks identified in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1A and market risks identified in the section entitled “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in Item 7A, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Our cash and cash equivalents balances are held in numerous locations throughout the world, with the majority of those amounts held outside of the United States. We utilize a variety of planning and financing strategies in an effort to ensure that our worldwide cash is available when and where it is needed. Our cash position remains strong, and we expect that our cash balances, anticipated cash flow generated from operations and access to capital markets will be sufficient to cover our expected near-term cash outlays.
Amounts held outside of the United States are generally utilized to support non-U.S. liquidity needs and may from time to time be distributed to the United States. The TCJA made significant changes to the U.S. tax law, including a one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings. The payments associated with this one-time transition tax will be paid over eight years and began in fiscal year 2019. We expect a significant portion of the cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
will no longer be subject to U.S. income tax consequences upon a subsequent repatriation to the United States as a result of the transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings. However, a portion of this cash may still be subject to foreign income tax or withholding tax consequences upon repatriation. As we evaluate the future cash needs of our operations, we may revise the amount of foreign earnings considered to be permanently reinvested in our foreign subsidiaries and how to utilize such funds, including reducing our gross debt level, or other uses.
Liquidity
Our cash and cash equivalents, marketable debt securities and total debt were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In billions
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
7.0
|
|
|
Marketable debt securities(1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
Total debt
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes highly liquid U.S. treasury notes, U.S. agency securities, non-U.S. government bonds, corporate debt securities, money market and other funds. We classify these investments within Other current assets in Consolidated Balance Sheets, including those with maturity dates beyond one year, based on their highly liquid nature and availability for use in current operations.
|
Our key cash flow metrics were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
4,654
|
|
|
$
|
4,528
|
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(438
|
)
|
|
(716
|
)
|
|
(1,717
|
)
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(4,845
|
)
|
|
(5,643
|
)
|
|
(1,251
|
)
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
(629
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,831
|
)
|
|
$
|
709
|
|
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased marginally by $0.1 billion for fiscal year 2019 as compared to fiscal year 2018.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $0.9 billion for fiscal year 2018 as compared to fiscal year 2017. The increase was primarily due to higher earnings from operations and cash generated from working capital management activities.
Working Capital Metrics
Management utilizes current cash conversion cycle information to manage our working capital level. The table below presents the cash conversion cycle:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable (“DSO”)
|
35
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
Days of supply in inventory (“DOS”)
|
41
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable (“DPO”)
|
(107
|
)
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
Cash conversion cycle
|
(31
|
)
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
(30
|
)
|
The cash conversion cycle is the sum of days of DSO and DOS less DPO. Items which may cause the cash conversion cycle in a particular period to differ from a long-term sustainable rate include, but are not limited to, changes in business mix, changes in payment terms, extent of receivables factoring, seasonal trends and the timing of revenue recognition and inventory purchases within the period.
DSO measures the average number of days our receivables are outstanding. DSO is calculated by dividing ending accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, by a 90-day average of net revenue. For fiscal years 2019 and
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
2018, the increase in DSO compared to fiscal years 2018 and 2017, respectively, was primarily due to unfavorable revenue linearity.
DOS measures the average number of days from procurement to sale of our product. DOS is calculated by dividing ending inventory by a 90-day average of cost of goods sold. For fiscal year 2019, the decrease in DOS compared to fiscal year 2018 was primarily due to reduction in inventory driven by reclassification of certain balances to other current assets pursuant to adoption of the new revenue standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. For fiscal year 2018, the DOS was lower primarily due to a focus on inventory management.
DPO measures the average number of days our accounts payable balances are outstanding. DPO is calculated by dividing ending accounts payable by a 90-day average of cost of goods sold. For fiscal year 2019, the increase in DPO compared to fiscal year 2018 was higher primarily due to working capital management activities, partially offset by lower inventory purchasing volume. For fiscal year 2018, the DPO remained flat compared to fiscal year 2017.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $0.3 billion for fiscal year 2019 as compared to fiscal year 2018, primarily due to lower net payments for acquisitions.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $1.0 billion for fiscal year 2018 as compared to fiscal year 2017, primarily due to a decrease in investments classified as available-for-sale investments within Other current assets by $1.6 billion, and collateral related to our derivatives of $0.4 billion, partially offset by the payment of $1.0 billion for the acquisition of Samsung’s printer business.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities decreased by $0.8 billion in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018, primarily due to lower payment of debt of $1.5 billion, partially offset by a decrease in outstanding commercial paper amounts of $0.7 billion.
Net cash used in financing activities increased by $4.4 billion in fiscal year 2018 compared to fiscal year 2017, primarily due to the payment to repurchase approximately $1.85 billion of debt, higher share repurchase amount of $1.1 billion and higher outstanding commercial paper of $0.9 billion in fiscal year 2017.
Capital Resources
Debt Levels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Dollars in millions
|
|
Short-term debt
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
|
$
|
1,072
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
$
|
4,780
|
|
|
$
|
4,524
|
|
|
$
|
6,747
|
|
|
Debt-to-equity ratio
|
(4.3)x
|
|
|
(9.4)x
|
|
|
(2.3)x
|
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
We maintain debt levels that we establish through consideration of a number of factors, including cash flow expectations, cash requirements for operations, investment plans (including acquisitions), share repurchase activities, our cost of capital and targeted capital structure.
Short-term debt decreased by $1.1 billion for fiscal year 2019 as compared to fiscal year 2018, primarily due to a decrease in outstanding commercial paper amounts of $0.9 billion.
Long-term debt decreased by $2.2 billion for fiscal year 2018 as compared to fiscal year 2017 primarily due to the payment to repurchase approximately $1.85 billion in aggregate principal amount of U.S. Dollar Global Notes.
Our debt-to-equity ratio is calculated as the carrying amount of debt divided by total stockholders’ deficit. Our debt-to-equity ratio changed by 5.1x in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018, primarily due to an increase in stockholders’ deficit balance of $0.6 billion.
Our debt-to-equity ratio changed by 7.1x in fiscal year 2018 compared to fiscal year 2017, primarily due to a decrease in stockholders’ deficit balance of $2.8 billion.
Our weighted-average interest rate reflects the effective interest rate on our borrowings prevailing during the period and reflects the effect of interest rate swaps. For more information on our interest rate swaps, see Note 10, “Financial Instruments” in the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Available Borrowing Resources
We had the following resources available to obtain short or long-term financing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31, 2019
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2016 Shelf Registration Statement
|
Unspecified
|
|
|
Uncommitted lines of credit
|
$
|
724
|
|
The 2016 Shelf Registration Statement will expire in December 2019, around which time we expect to file a new shelf registration statement.
As of October 31, 2019, we maintain a senior unsecured committed revolving credit facility with aggregate lending commitments of $4.0 billion, that will be available until March 30, 2023 and is primarily to support the issuance of commercial paper. Funds borrowed under this revolving credit facility may also be used for general corporate purposes.
For more information on our borrowings, see Note 11, “Borrowings”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Credit Ratings
Our credit risk is evaluated by major independent rating agencies based upon publicly available information as well as information obtained in our ongoing discussions with them. While we do not have any rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity of a material amount of our debt, previous downgrades have increased the cost of borrowing under our credit facility, have reduced market capacity for our commercial paper and have required the posting of additional collateral under some of our derivative contracts. In addition, any further downgrade to our credit ratings by any rating agencies may further impact us in a similar manner, and, depending on the extent of any such downgrade, could have a negative impact on our liquidity and capital position. We can access alternative sources of funding, including drawdowns under our credit facility, if necessary, to offset potential reductions in the market capacity for our commercial paper.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
CONTRACTUAL AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS
Our contractual and other obligations as of October 31, 2019, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
Total
|
|
1 Year or
Less
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
More than 5 Years
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Principal payments on debt(1)
|
$
|
4,539
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
1,955
|
|
|
$
|
1,245
|
|
|
$
|
1,210
|
|
|
Interest payments on debt(2)
|
1,890
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
Purchase obligations(3)
|
372
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations(4)
|
1,340
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations(5)
|
676
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Total(6)(7)(8)(9)
|
$
|
8,817
|
|
|
$
|
1,052
|
|
|
$
|
3,149
|
|
|
$
|
1,762
|
|
|
$
|
2,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amounts represent the principal cash payments relating to our short-term and long-term debt and do not include any fair value adjustments, discounts or premiums.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Amounts represent the expected interest payments relating to our short-term and long-term debt. We have outstanding interest rate swap agreements accounted for as fair value hedges that have the economic effect of changing fixed interest rates associated with some of our U.S. Dollar Global Notes to variable interest rates. The impact of our outstanding interest rate swaps at October 31, 2019 was factored into the calculation of the future interest payments on debt.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. These purchase obligations are related principally to inventory and other items. Purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty. Purchase obligations also exclude open purchase orders that are routine arrangements entered into in the ordinary course of business as they are difficult to quantify in a meaningful way. Even though open purchase orders are considered enforceable and legally binding, the terms generally allow us the option to cancel, reschedule, and adjust terms based on our business needs prior to the delivery of goods or performance of services.
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Amounts represent the operating lease obligations, net of total sublease income of $130 million.
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
Amounts represent the capital lease obligations, including total capital lease interest obligations of $64 million.
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plan Contributions. In fiscal year 2020, we expect to contribute approximately $76 million to non-U.S. pension plans, $36 million to cover benefit payments to U.S. non-qualified plan participants and $6 million to cover benefit claims for our post-retirement benefit plans. Our policy is to fund our pension plans so that we meet at least the minimum contribution required by local government, funding and taxing authorities. Expected contributions and payments to our pension and post-retirement benefit plans are excluded from the contractual obligations table because they do not represent contractual cash outflows as they are dependent on numerous factors which may result in a wide range of outcomes. For more information on our retirement and post-retirement benefit plans, see Note 4, “Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
Cost Savings Plans. As a result of our approved restructuring plans, including the Fiscal 2020 plan, we expect to make future cash payments of approximately $1.0 billion. We expect to make future cash payments of $418 million in fiscal year 2020 with remaining cash payments through fiscal year 2023. These payments have been excluded from the contractual obligations table because they do not represent contractual cash outflows and there is uncertainty as to the timing of these payments. For more information on our restructuring activities that are part of our cost improvements, see Note 3, “Restructuring and Other Charges”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
Uncertain Tax Positions. As of October 31, 2019, we had approximately $509 million of recorded liabilities and related interest and penalties pertaining to uncertain tax positions. We are unable to make a reasonable estimate as to when cash settlement with the tax authorities might occur due to the uncertainties related to these tax matters. Payments of these obligations would result from settlements with taxing authorities. For more information on our uncertain tax positions, see Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
Payment of one-time transition taxes under the TCJA. The TCJA made significant changes to U.S. tax law resulting in a one-time gross transition tax of $3.0 billion on accumulated foreign earnings. We expect the actual cash payments for the tax to be much lower as we expect to reduce the overall liability by more than half once existing and future credits and other balance sheet tax attributes are used. The payments associated with this one-time transition tax will be paid over eight years and began in fiscal year 2019.
|
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As part of our ongoing business, we have not participated in transactions that generate material relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
We have third-party short-term financing arrangements intended to facilitate the working capital requirements of certain customers. For more information on our third-party short-term financing arrangements, see Note 7 “Supplementary Financial Information” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate risks that could impact our financial position and results of operations. Our risk management strategy with respect to these market risks may include the use of derivative instruments. We use derivative contracts only to manage existing underlying exposures. Accordingly, we do not use derivative contracts for speculative purposes. Our risks, risk management strategy and a sensitivity analysis estimating the effects of changes in fair value for each of these exposures are outlined below.
Actual gains and losses in the future may differ materially from the sensitivity analyses based on changes in the timing and amount of foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate movements and our actual exposures and derivatives in place at the time of the change, as well as the effectiveness of the derivative to hedge the related exposure.
Foreign currency exchange rate risk
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk inherent in our sales commitments, anticipated sales, anticipated purchases and assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We transact business in over 40 currencies worldwide, of which the most significant foreign currencies to our operations for fiscal year 2019 were the euro, Chinese yuan renminbi, the Japanese yen and the British pound. For most currencies, we are a net receiver of the foreign currency and therefore benefit from a weaker U.S. dollar and are adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to the foreign currency. Even where we are a net receiver of the foreign currency, a weaker U.S. dollar may adversely affect certain expense figures, if taken alone.
We use a combination of forward contracts and at times, options designated as cash flow hedges to protect against the foreign currency exchange rate risks inherent in our forecasted net revenue and, to a lesser extent in cost of sales. In addition, when debt is denominated in a foreign currency, we may use swaps to exchange the foreign currency principal and interest obligations for U.S. dollar-denominated amounts to manage the exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We also use other derivatives not designated as hedging instruments consisting primarily of forward contracts to hedge foreign currency balance sheet exposures. Alternatively, we may choose not to hedge the risk associated with our foreign currency exposures, primarily if such exposure acts as a natural hedge for offsetting amounts denominated in the same currency or if the currency is too difficult or too expensive to hedge.
We have performed sensitivity analyses for continuing operations as of October 31, 2019 and 2018, using a modeling technique that measures the change in the fair values arising from a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in the levels of foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar, with all other variables held constant. The analyses cover all of our foreign currency derivative contracts offset by underlying exposures. The foreign currency exchange rates we used in performing the sensitivity analysis were based on market rates in effect at October 31, 2019 and 2018. The sensitivity analyses indicated that a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates would result in a foreign exchange fair value loss of $81 million and $75 million at October 31, 2019 and October 31, 2018, respectively.
Interest rate risk
We also are exposed to interest rate risk related to debt we have issued and our investment portfolio.
We issue long-term debt in either U.S. dollars or foreign currencies based on market conditions at the time of financing. We often use interest rate and/or currency swaps to modify the market risk exposures in connection with the debt to achieve U.S. dollar LIBOR-based floating interest expense. The swap transactions generally involve the exchange of fixed for floating interest payments. However, we may choose not to swap fixed for floating interest payments or may terminate a previously executed swap if we believe a larger proportion of fixed-rate debt would be beneficial.
In order to hedge the fair value of certain fixed-rate investments, we may enter into interest rate swaps that convert fixed interest returns into variable interest returns. We may use cash flow hedges to hedge the variability of LIBOR-based interest income received on certain variable-rate investments. We may also enter into interest rate swaps that convert variable rate interest returns into fixed-rate interest returns.
We have performed sensitivity analyses as of October 31, 2019 and 2018, using a modeling technique that measures the change in the fair values arising from a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in the levels of interest rates across the entire yield curve, with all other variables held constant. The analyses cover our debt, investments and interest rate swaps. The analyses use actual or approximate maturities for the debt, investments and interest rate swaps. The discount rates used were based on the market interest rates in effect at October 31, 2019 and 2018. The sensitivity analyses indicated that a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in interest rates would have resulted in a loss in the fair values of our debt and investments, net of interest rate swaps, of $49 million at October 31, 2019 and $69 million at October 31, 2018.
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of HP Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of HP Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of October 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at October 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated December 12, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Adoption of New Accounting Standard
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method for recognizing revenue as a result of the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), and the amendments effective November 1, 2018 under the modified retrospective method. See below for discussion of our related critical audit matter.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes
|
|
Description of the Matter
|
As described in Notes 1 and 6 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company is subject to income taxes in the United States and approximately 58 other countries and is subject to routine corporate income tax audits in many of those jurisdictions. Uncertainty in the Company’s tax positions may arise as tax laws are subject to interpretation and the Company’s positions are subject to examination by taxing authorities, which may result in assessments of additional amounts owed. Determining the income tax provision for these potential assessments and recording the related effects requires significant management judgment in estimating whether a tax position’s technical merits are more-likely-than-not to be sustained and measuring the amount of tax benefit that qualifies for recognition.
Additionally, the Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount which are more likely than not to be realized. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, the Company considers certain subjective factors such as future market growth, forecasted earnings, future taxable income, mix of earnings in the jurisdictions in which they operate and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.
Our assessment of management’s analyses of the reserve for uncertain tax positions and the realizability of its deferred tax assets are significant to our audit because the amounts are material to the financial statements and the assessment process involves significant judgment. For example, management’s assumptions that may be affected by future market and economic conditions or interpretations of tax laws and legal rulings are challenging to audit.
|
|
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
|
We tested controls over management’s processes relating to the recording of unrecognized tax benefits, including controls over the Company’s process to assess the technical merits of its uncertain tax positions, and the realizability of deferred tax assets, including the development of the above described assumptions and judgments.
Our audit procedures included an evaluation of the Company’s key assumptions and judgments and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used to determine the amount of unrecognized tax benefits recognized. For example, we evaluated the measurement of the amounts recorded taking into consideration the applicable tax laws. We also evaluated the key assumptions and judgments used by management in determining the need for a valuation allowance and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the Company’s process. For example, we compared the projections of future taxable income with the actual results of prior periods as well as management’s consideration of current industry and economic trends. In each of these areas, we involved our tax professionals to assess the technical merits of the Company’s tax positions. This included assessing the Company’s correspondence with the relevant tax authorities and evaluating income tax opinions or other third-party advice obtained by the Company.
|
|
Revenue Recognition
|
|
Description of the Matter
|
As described in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company enters into certain contracts to sell their products and services that contain non-standard terms and conditions and multiple performance obligations. For such contracts, significant interpretation may be required to determine the appropriate accounting, including the allocation of the transaction price among performance obligations in the arrangement and the timing of the transfer of control of promised goods or services for each of those performance obligations.
In addition, the Company reduces revenue for customer and distributor programs and incentive offerings including rebates, promotions, other volume-based incentives and expected returns. The Company uses significant estimates to determine the expected variable consideration for such programs based on factors like historical experience, forecasted sales, expected customer behavior and market conditions. Also, as discussed above, the Company adopted the new revenue recognition standard, which added further complexity and judgment related to the transition amount recorded at the date of adoption.
Our assessment of management’s evaluation of the appropriate accounting for revenue contracts and the determination of the variable consideration for sales incentives and implementation of the new revenue recognition standard are significant to our audit because the amounts are material to the financial statements and the assessment process involves significant judgment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
|
We tested relevant controls over the identified risks related to the Company’s implementation of the new revenue recognition standard and the accounting for revenue recognition, including the controls to evaluate the appropriate accounting treatment for contracts containing non-standard terms and conditions and multiple performance obligations and the controls related to the estimation process to record the variable consideration related to certain sales incentives.
Our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating how the Company applied the new revenue recognition standard to its contracts and assessing how the Company applied judgment to determine the transition amount and disclosures, inspection of contracts entered into during the period, evaluation of management’s judgments related to the interpretation of certain contract provisions including the identification of performance obligations, the method of allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the arrangement, and the assessment of the appropriateness of the amount of revenue recognized. We also evaluated the Company’s key assumptions and judgments and tested the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used to determine the variable consideration for sales incentives. This included analyzing data related to the historical experience of sales incentive payments as well as understanding the current market dynamics that can affect the estimate of variable consideration to assess the Company’s judgments and estimates.
|
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2000
San Jose, California
December 12, 2019
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of HP Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited HP Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, HP Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of HP Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2019, and the related notes and our report dated December 12, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Jose, California
December 12, 2019
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
HP’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. HP’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. HP’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of HP; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of HP are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of HP; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of HP’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
HP’s management assessed the effectiveness of HP’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2019, utilizing the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013 framework). Based on the assessment by HP’s management, we determined that HP’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2019. The effectiveness of HP’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2019 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, HP’s independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears on page 54 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ENRIQUE LORES
|
|
/s/ STEVE FIELER
|
|
Enrique Lores
President and Chief Executive Officer
December 12, 2019
|
|
Steve Fieler
Chief Financial Officer
December 12, 2019
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions, except per share amounts
|
|
Net revenue
|
$
|
58,756
|
|
|
$
|
58,472
|
|
|
$
|
52,056
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
47,586
|
|
|
47,803
|
|
|
42,478
|
|
|
Research and development
|
1,499
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
5,368
|
|
|
5,099
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
275
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
Acquisition-related charges
|
35
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
116
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
54,879
|
|
|
54,641
|
|
|
48,688
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
3,877
|
|
|
3,831
|
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
(1,354
|
)
|
|
(818
|
)
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
Earnings before taxes
|
2,523
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
|
3,276
|
|
|
Benefit from (provision for) taxes
|
629
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
Net earnings
|
$
|
3,152
|
|
|
$
|
5,327
|
|
|
$
|
2,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
3.30
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
2.07
|
|
|
$
|
3.26
|
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used to compute net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
1,515
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
Diluted
|
1,524
|
|
|
1,634
|
|
|
1,702
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Net earnings
|
$
|
3,152
|
|
|
$
|
5,327
|
|
|
$
|
2,526
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized components of available-for-sale debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period
|
1
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
4
|
|
|
Losses (gains) reclassified into earnings
|
3
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
4
|
|
|
Change in unrealized components of cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period
|
252
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
(651
|
)
|
|
(Gains) losses reclassified into earnings
|
(380
|
)
|
|
258
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
599
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
|
Change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses) gains arising during the period
|
(303
|
)
|
|
11
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit
|
43
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
Curtailments, settlements and other
|
42
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
62
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
Change in cumulative translation adjustment
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before taxes
|
(338
|
)
|
|
653
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
(42
|
)
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes
|
(380
|
)
|
|
573
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
$
|
2,772
|
|
|
$
|
5,900
|
|
|
$
|
2,546
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions, except par value
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
4,537
|
|
|
$
|
5,166
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
6,031
|
|
|
5,113
|
|
|
Inventory
|
5,734
|
|
|
6,062
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
3,875
|
|
|
5,046
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
20,177
|
|
|
21,387
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
2,794
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
6,372
|
|
|
5,968
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
4,124
|
|
|
5,069
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
33,467
|
|
|
$
|
34,622
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and short-term borrowings
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
14,793
|
|
|
14,816
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
10,143
|
|
|
8,852
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
25,293
|
|
|
25,131
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
4,780
|
|
|
4,524
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
4,587
|
|
|
5,606
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value (300 shares authorized; none issued)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value (9,600 shares authorized; 1,458 and 1,560 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2019, and 2018 respectively)
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
835
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(818
|
)
|
|
(473
|
)
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(1,225
|
)
|
|
(845
|
)
|
|
Total stockholders’ deficit
|
(1,193
|
)
|
|
(639
|
)
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
|
$
|
33,467
|
|
|
$
|
34,622
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
$
|
3,152
|
|
|
$
|
5,327
|
|
|
$
|
2,526
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
744
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
297
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
275
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
Deferred taxes on earnings
|
133
|
|
|
(3,653
|
)
|
|
238
|
|
|
Other, net
|
254
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
(761
|
)
|
|
(491
|
)
|
|
(453
|
)
|
|
Inventory
|
(68
|
)
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
(1,346
|
)
|
|
Accounts payable
|
(53
|
)
|
|
1,429
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
Taxes on earnings
|
(851
|
)
|
|
389
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
Restructuring and other
|
(154
|
)
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
1,686
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
(363
|
)
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
4,654
|
|
|
4,528
|
|
|
3,677
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in property, plant and equipment
|
(671
|
)
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
(402
|
)
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
—
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities and other investments
|
(80
|
)
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
(1,400
|
)
|
|
Maturities and sales of available-for-sale securities and other investments
|
771
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
Collateral posted for derivative instruments
|
(32
|
)
|
|
(1,165
|
)
|
|
(1,170
|
)
|
|
Collateral returned for derivative instruments
|
32
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
Payments made in connection with business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
(458
|
)
|
|
(1,036
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(438
|
)
|
|
(716
|
)
|
|
(1,717
|
)
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Payments of) Proceeds from short-term borrowings with original maturities less than 90 days, net
|
(856
|
)
|
|
743
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term borrowings with original maturities greater than 90 days
|
—
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
887
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt, net of issuance costs
|
127
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Payment of short-term borrowings with original maturities greater than 90 days
|
—
|
|
|
(1,596
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
Payment of debt
|
(680
|
)
|
|
(2,098
|
)
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
Settlement of cash flow hedges
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
Stock-based award activities
|
(61
|
)
|
|
52
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
(2,405
|
)
|
|
(2,557
|
)
|
|
(1,412
|
)
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
(970
|
)
|
|
(899
|
)
|
|
(894
|
)
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(4,845
|
)
|
|
(5,643
|
)
|
|
(1,251
|
)
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(629
|
)
|
|
(1,831
|
)
|
|
709
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
5,166
|
|
|
6,997
|
|
|
6,288
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
4,537
|
|
|
$
|
5,166
|
|
|
$
|
6,997
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
951
|
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
|
Interest expense paid
|
$
|
240
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
322
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of assets under capital leases
|
$
|
366
|
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-in Capital
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Loss
|
|
Total Stockholders' Deficit
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
In millions, except number of shares in thousands
|
|
Balance October 31, 2016
|
1,712,091
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
1,030
|
|
|
$
|
(3,498
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,438
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,889
|
)
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,526
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,546
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other
|
18,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
(81,043
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(926
|
)
|
|
(520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(1,447
|
)
|
|
Cash dividends ($0.53 per common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(894
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(894
|
)
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
Balance October 31, 2017
|
1,649,580
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
|
$
|
(2,386
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,418
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,408
|
)
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,327
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,900
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other
|
21,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
(111,038
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
(2,515
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(2,547
|
)
|
|
Cash dividends ($0.56 per common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(899
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(899
|
)
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
Balance October 31, 2018
|
1,560,270
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
663
|
|
|
$
|
(473
|
)
|
|
$
|
(845
|
)
|
|
$
|
(639
|
)
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,152
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,772
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other
|
15,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
(117,598
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
(2,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
|
Cash dividends ($0.64 per common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(968
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(968
|
)
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
Adjustment for adoption of accounting standards (Note 1)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
Balance October 31, 2019
|
1,457,719
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
835
|
|
|
$
|
(818
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,225
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,193
|
)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of HP and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP.
Principles of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of HP and its subsidiaries and affiliates in which HP has a controlling financial interest or is the primary beneficiary. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Reclassifications
Effective at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal year 2019, HP implemented an organizational change to align its business unit financial reporting more closely with its current business structure. HP reflected this change to its business unit information in prior reporting periods on an as-if basis. The reporting change had no impact to previously reported segment net revenue, consolidated net revenue, earnings from operations, net earnings or net EPS.
HP has reclassified certain prior-year amounts to conform to the current-year presentation as a result of the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-07, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost”. This adoption had no impact on previously reported consolidated net revenue, net earnings or net EPS.
For detailed discussion see Note 2, “Segment Information”.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in HP’s Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ materially from those estimates.
Foreign Currency Translation
HP predominantly uses the U.S. dollar as its functional currency. Assets and liabilities denominated in non-U.S. dollars are remeasured into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates for monetary assets and liabilities and at historical exchange rates for nonmonetary assets and liabilities. Net revenue, costs and expenses denominated in non-U.S. dollars are recorded in U.S. dollars at monthly average exchange rates prevailing during the period. HP includes gains or losses from foreign currency remeasurement in Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Certain foreign subsidiaries designate the local currency as their functional currency, and HP records the translation of their assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars at the balance sheet dates as translation adjustments and includes them as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Separation Transaction
In connection with the Separation, HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise entered into a separation and distribution agreement, an employee matters agreement and various other agreements which remain enforceable that provide a framework for the continuing relationships between the parties. For more information on the impacts of these agreements, see Note 7, “Supplementary Financial Information”, Note 14, “Litigation and Contingencies” and Note 15, “Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties”.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2018, the FASB issued guidance, which eliminates the stranded tax effects in other comprehensive income resulting from the TCJA. Because the amendments only relate to the reclassification of the income tax effects of the TCJA, the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from operations is not affected. HP early adopted this guidance in the third quarter of fiscal year 2019. The implementation of this guidance resulted in a $69 million reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive loss to accumulated deficit.
In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance, which addresses the improvement of the presentation of net periodic pension and net periodic post-retirement benefit cost. The guidance requires entities to present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. Additionally, the guidance requires that companies present the other components of the net periodic benefit cost separately from the line item that includes service cost and any other subtotal of income from operations. The amendments in this guidance are to be applied retrospectively for presentation in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. A practical expedient allows companies to use the amount disclosed in its pension and other post-retirement plan note for the prior comparative periods as the estimation basis for applying the retrospective presentation
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
requirements. HP adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 and elected to use the practical expedient. The adoption of this guidance has no impact on net earnings. The reclassification resulted in an increase in total cost and expenses and a reduction in interest and other, net of $233 million for the twelve months ended October 31, 2018.
In November 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which addresses the presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The guidance requires entities to present the changes in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. HP adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. The implementation of this guidance did not have any impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting for Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The guidance (Topic 740) requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. It also requires modified retrospective transition with a cumulative catch-up adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of adoption. HP adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. The implementation of this guidance resulted in $353 million of net reduction to its prepaid tax asset adjusted through accumulated deficit. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019, HP corrected this impact to $47 million by recording a deferred tax asset adjusted through accumulated deficit.
In August 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting standards for the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. HP adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. The implementation of this guidance did not have any impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. The guidance (Topic 825-10) primarily addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The amendments should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption, with other amendments related specifically to equity securities without readily determinable fair values applied prospectively. HP adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. The implementation of this guidance did not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. The amendments (Topic 606) are based on the principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. HP adopted the new revenue standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 using the modified retrospective method applied to contracts that were not completed as of November 1, 2018. HP recognized the net impact of adoption as an increase to accumulated deficit by $212 million, net of tax, on November 1, 2018.
The primary changes that impact the Consolidated Financial Statements are as below:
Variable consideration - HP estimates the transaction price for elements of consideration which are variable in nature. Certain distributor programs and incentive offerings which were recorded at the date the sales incentives were offered, are now recorded at the time of revenue recognition based on estimates.
Costs to obtain a contract - The incremental costs to obtain a contract are primarily comprised of eligible sales commissions which were previously expensed as incurred. HP has capitalized such eligible sales commission costs for contracts with terms of more than one year and amortized those costs over the expected period of the benefit.
The adoption has led to certain balance sheet reclassifications pertaining to return asset and liability and repurchase reserves which impacts accounts receivable, net, inventory, other current assets and other current liabilities balances.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In August 2017, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting standards for derivatives and hedging. The amendment improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better represent the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements and made certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance in current U.S. GAAP. HP is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. Earlier adoption is permitted. Based on the current assessment, HP expects that the implementation of this guidance will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which requires credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, not based on incurred losses. Further, credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities should be recorded through an allowance for credit losses limited to the amount by which fair value is below
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
amortized cost. HP is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2021. Earlier adoption is permitted. HP is currently evaluating the timing and the impact of this guidance on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance (“Topic 842”), which amends the existing accounting standards for leases. Consistent with current guidance, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification. Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for all leases with lease terms of more than twelve months. HP will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2020 and will apply the modified retrospective transition option made available in July 2018 by the FASB, whereby comparative periods will not be retrospectively presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements. HP will also elect the package of practical expedients not to reassess prior conclusions related to contracts containing leases, lease classification and initial direct costs and the lessee practical expedient to combine lease and non-lease components for certain asset classes.
HP has established a cross-functional implementation team to assist in determining the scope of impact, identifying changes to its business processes, implementing a new system solution and evaluating changes to internal controls to support adoption of the new standard. HP currently expects the adoption of Topic 842 to result in an increase in right of use assets and a corresponding increase in lease liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet of approximately $1.0 billion to $1.5 billion. Upon adoption, HP will also record revenue upfront on certain aspects of its MPS and DaaS offerings and will reflect the financing of these offerings as cash flows from financing activities on the Statement of Cash Flows. HP has substantially completed the process of quantifying the impacts that will result from applying the new guidance, and the assessment will be finalized during the first quarter of fiscal year 2020.
Revenue Recognition
General
HP recognizes revenues at a point in time or over time depicting the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which HP expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. HP follows the five-step model for revenue recognition as summarized below:
1. Identify the contract with a customer - A contract with customer exists when (i) it is approved and signed by all parties,
(ii) each party’s rights and obligations can be identified, (iii) payment terms are defined, (iv) it has commercial substance and (v) the customer has the ability and intent to pay. HP evaluates customers’ ability to pay based on various factors like historical payment experience, financial metrics and customer credit scores. While the majority of our sales contracts contain standard terms and conditions, there are certain contracts with non-standard terms and conditions.
2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract - HP evaluates each performance obligation in an arrangement to
determine whether it is distinct, such as hardware and/or service. A performance obligation constitutes distinct goods or services when the customer can benefit from such goods or services either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer and the performance obligation is distinct within the context of the contract.
3. Determine the transaction price - Transaction price is the amount of consideration to which HP expects to be entitled in
exchange for transferring goods or services to the customer. If the transaction price includes a variable amount, HP estimates the amount it expects to be entitled to using either the expected value or most likely amount method.
HP reduces the transaction price at the time of revenue recognition for customer and distributor programs and incentive
offerings, rebates, promotions, other volume-based incentives and expected returns. HP uses estimates to determine the expected variable consideration for such programs based on factors like historical experience, expected consumer behavior and market conditions.
HP has elected the practical expedient of not accounting for significant financing components if the period between
revenue recognition and when the customer pays for the product or service is one year or less.
4. Allocate the transaction price to performance obligations in the contract - When a sales arrangement contains multiple
performance obligations, such as hardware and/or services, HP allocates revenue to each performance obligation in proportion to their selling price. The selling price for each performance obligation is based on its SSP. HP establishes SSP using the price charged for a performance obligation when sold separately (“observable price”) and, in some instances, using the price established by management having the relevant authority. When observable price is not available, HP establishes SSP based on management judgment considering internal factors such as margin objectives, pricing practices and controls, customer segment pricing strategies and the product life-cycle. Consideration is also given to market conditions such as competitor pricing strategies and technology industry life cycles.
5. Recognize revenue when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied - Revenue is recognized when, or as, a
performance obligation is satisfied by transferring control of a promised good or service to a customer. HP generally invoices the customer upon delivery of the goods or services and the payments are due as per contract terms. For fixed
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
price support or maintenance contracts that are in the nature of stand-ready obligations, payments are generally received in advance from customers and revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the duration of the contract.
HP reports revenue net of any taxes collected from customers and remitted to government authorities, and the collected taxes are recorded as other current liabilities until remitted to the relevant government authority. HP includes costs related to shipping and handling in cost of revenue.
HP records revenue on a gross basis when HP is a principal in the transaction and on a net basis when HP is acting as an agent between the customer and the vendor. HP considers several factors to determine whether it is acting as a principal or an agent, most notably whether HP is the primary obligor to the customer, has established its own pricing and has inventory and credit risks.
Hardware
HP transfers control of the products to the customer at the time the product is delivered to the customer and recognizes revenue accordingly, unless customer acceptance is uncertain or significant obligations to the customer remain unfulfilled.
Services
HP recognizes revenue from fixed-price support, maintenance and other service contracts over time depicting the pattern of service delivery and recognizes the costs associated with these contracts as incurred.
Contract Assets and Liabilities
Contract assets are rights to consideration in exchange for goods or services that HP has transferred to a customer when such right is conditional on something other than the passage of time. Such contract assets are not material to HP’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contract liabilities are recorded as deferred revenues when amounts invoiced to customers are more than the revenues recognized or when payments are received in advance for fixed price support or maintenance contracts. The short-term and long-term deferred revenues are reported within the other current liabilities and other non-current liabilities respectively.
Cost to obtain a contract and fulfillment cost
Incremental direct costs of obtaining a contract primarily consist of sales commissions. HP has elected the practical expedient to expense as incurred the costs to obtain a contract with a benefit period equal to or less than one year. For contracts with a period of benefit greater than one year, HP capitalizes incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer and amortizes these costs over their expected period of benefit provided such costs are recoverable.
Fulfillment costs consist of set-up and transition costs related to other service contracts. These costs generate or enhance resources of HP that will be used in satisfying the performance obligation in the future and are capitalized and amortized over the expected period of the benefit, provided such costs are recoverable.
See Note 7, “Supplementary Financial Information” for details on net revenue by region, cost to obtain a contract and fulfillment cost, contract liabilities and value of remaining performance obligations.
Transition disclosure
In accordance with the modified retrospective method transition requirements, HP has presented the financial statement line items impacted and adjusted to compare to presentation under the prior GAAP for the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of October 31, 2019 and for Consolidated Statement of Earnings for fiscal year ended October 31, 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31, 2019
|
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET ITEMS
|
As Reported
|
|
Effect of Adoption
|
|
Balances Without Adoption of Topic 606
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
$
|
6,031
|
|
|
$
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
5,813
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
5,734
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
5,922
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
3,875
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
3,687
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
$
|
4,124
|
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
4,093
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
$
|
10,143
|
|
|
$
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
9,708
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
$
|
(818
|
)
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
|
$
|
(632
|
)
|
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2019
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS ITEMS
|
|
As Reported
|
|
Effect of Adoption
|
|
Balances Without Adoption of Topic 606
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
58,756
|
|
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
58,723
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
3,877
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
|
|
Earnings before taxes
|
|
2,523
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
|
|
Benefit from taxes
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
3,152
|
|
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
3,126
|
|
|
Opening Balance Sheet Adjustments:
The following table presents the adoption impact of the new accounting standards to HP’s previously reported financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported on
October 31, 2018
|
|
Adjustments under Topic 606
|
|
Other (1)
|
|
As Restated on
November 1, 2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
$
|
5,113
|
|
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,326
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
6,062
|
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,859
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
5,046
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
5,159
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
$
|
5,069
|
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,145
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
$
|
8,852
|
|
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,310
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(845
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(847
|
)
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
$
|
(473
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(730
|
)
|
|
(1) Other includes $47 million adjustment related to Topic 740.
Stock-Based Compensation
HP determines stock-based compensation expense based on the measurement date fair value of the award. HP recognizes compensation cost only for those awards expected to meet the service and performance vesting conditions on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. HP determines compensation costs at the aggregate grant level for service-based awards and at the individual vesting tranche level for awards with performance and/or market conditions. HP estimates the forfeiture rate based on its historical experience.
Retirement and Post-Retirement Plans
HP has various defined benefit, other contributory and non-contributory retirement and post-retirement plans. HP generally amortizes unrecognized actuarial gains and losses on a straight-line basis over the average remaining estimated service life of participants. In limited cases, HP amortizes actuarial gains and losses using the corridor approach. See Note 4, “Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans” for a full description of these plans and the accounting and funding policies.
Advertising cost
Costs to produce advertising are expensed as incurred during production. Costs to communicate advertising are expensed when the advertising is first run. Such costs totaled approximately $652 million, $568 million and $544 million in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Restructuring and Other Charges
HP records charges associated with management-approved restructuring plans to reorganize one or more of HP’s business segments, to remove duplicative headcount and infrastructure associated with business acquisitions or to simplify business processes and accelerate innovation. Restructuring charges can include severance costs to reduce a specified number of
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
employees, enhanced early retirement incentives, infrastructure charges to vacate facilities and consolidate operations, and contract cancellation costs. HP records restructuring charges based on estimated employee terminations, committed early retirements and site closure and consolidation plans. HP accrues for severance and other employee separation costs under these actions when it is probable that benefits will be paid and the amount is reasonably estimable. The rates used in determining severance accruals are based on existing plans, historical experiences and negotiated settlements. Other charges include non-recurring costs, including those as a result of the Separation or information technology rationalization efforts, and are distinct from ongoing operational costs.
Taxes on Earnings
HP recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts using enacted tax rates in effect for the year the differences are expected to reverse. HP records a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
HP records accruals for uncertain tax positions when HP believes that it is not more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. HP makes adjustments to these accruals when facts and circumstances change, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an estimate. The provision for income taxes includes the effects of adjustments for uncertain tax positions, as well as any related interest and penalties.
Accounts Receivable
HP establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts for accounts receivable. HP records a specific reserve for individual accounts when HP becomes aware of specific customer circumstances, such as in the case of a bankruptcy filing or deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position. If there are additional changes in circumstances related to the specific customer, HP further adjusts estimates of the recoverability of receivables. HP maintains bad debt reserves for all other customers based on a variety of factors, including the use of third-party credit risk models that generate quantitative measures of default probabilities based on market factors, the financial condition of customers, the length of time receivables are past due, trends in the weighted-average risk rating for the portfolio, macroeconomic conditions, information derived from competitive benchmarking, significant one-time events and historical experience. The past due or delinquency status of a receivable is based on the contractual payment terms of the receivable.
HP has third-party short-term financing arrangements intended to facilitate the working capital requirements of certain customers. These financing arrangements, which in certain cases provide for partial recourse, result in the transfer of HP’s trade receivables to a third party. HP reflects amounts transferred to, but not yet collected from the third party in accounts receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For arrangements involving an element of recourse, the fair value of the recourse obligation is measured using market data from similar transactions and reported as a current liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Concentrations of Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject HP to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, investments, receivables from trade customers and contract manufacturers and derivatives.
HP maintains cash and cash equivalents, investments, derivatives and certain other financial instruments with various financial institutions. These financial institutions are located in many different geographic regions, and HP’s policy is designed to limit exposure from any particular institution. As part of its risk management processes, HP performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions. HP has not sustained material credit losses from instruments held at these financial institutions. HP utilizes derivative contracts to protect against the effects of foreign currency, interest rate and, on certain investment exposures. Such contracts involve the risk of non-performance by the counterparty, which could result in a material loss. The likelihood of which HP deems to be remote.
HP sells a significant portion of its products through third-party distributors and resellers and, as a result, maintains individually significant receivable balances with these parties. If the financial condition or operations of these distributors’ and resellers’ aggregated business deteriorates substantially, HP’s operating results could be adversely affected. The ten largest distributor and reseller receivable balances, which were concentrated primarily in North America and Europe, collectively represented approximately 32% and 39% of gross accounts receivable as of October 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. No single customer accounts for more than 10% of gross accounts receivable as of October 31, 2019 or 2018. Credit risk with respect to other accounts receivable is generally diversified due to HP’s large customer base and their dispersion across many different industries and geographic markets. HP performs ongoing credit evaluations of the financial condition of its third-party
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
distributors, resellers and other customers and may require collateral, such as letters of credit and bank guarantees, in certain circumstances.
HP utilizes outsourced manufacturers around the world to manufacture HP-designed products. HP may purchase product components from suppliers and sell those components to its outsourced manufacturers thereby creating receivable balances from the outsourced manufacturers. The three largest outsourced manufacturer receivable balances collectively represented 77% and 72% of HP’s supplier receivables of $1,165 million and $1,074 million as of October 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. HP includes the supplier receivables in Other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets on a gross basis. HP’s credit risk associated with these receivables is mitigated wholly or in part, by the amount HP owes to these outsourced manufacturers, as HP generally has the legal right to offset its payables to the outsourced manufacturers against these receivables. HP does not reflect the sale of these components in net revenue and does not recognize any profit on these component sales until the related products are sold by HP, at which time any profit is recognized as a reduction to cost of revenue.
HP obtains a significant number of components from single source suppliers due to technology, availability, price, quality or other considerations. The loss of a single source supplier, the deterioration of HP’s relationship with a single source supplier, or any unilateral modification to the contractual terms under which HP is supplied components by a single source supplier could adversely affect HP’s net revenue and gross margins.
Upon completion of the Separation on November 1, 2015, HP recorded net income tax indemnification receivables from Hewlett Packard Enterprise for certain income tax liabilities that HP is jointly and severally liable for, but for which it is indemnified by Hewlett Packard Enterprise under the tax matters agreement (“TMA”). The TMA was terminated during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019. The net payable as of October 31, 2019 was $98 million and net receivable as of October 31, 2018 was $1.0 billion.
Inventory
HP values inventory at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed using standard cost which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis. Adjustments, if required, to reduce the cost of inventory to market (net realizable value) are made, for estimated excess, obsolete or impaired balances.
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
HP reflects property, plant and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation. HP capitalizes additions and improvements and expenses maintenance and repairs as incurred. Depreciation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives are five to 40 years for buildings and improvements and three to 15 years for machinery and equipment. HP depreciates leasehold improvements over the life of the lease or the asset, whichever is shorter. HP depreciates equipment held for lease over the initial term of the lease to the equipment’s estimated residual value. On retirement or disposition, the asset cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the Consolidated Balance Sheets with any gain or loss recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Internal Use Software and Cloud Computing Arrangements
HP capitalizes external costs and directly attributable internal costs to acquire or create internal use software which are incurred subsequent to the completion of the preliminary project stage. These costs relate to activities such as software design, configuration, coding, testing, and installation. Costs related to post-implementation activities such as training and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Once the software is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, capitalized development costs are amortized straight-line over the estimated useful life of the software, not to exceed five years.
HP also enters into certain cloud-based software hosting arrangements that are accounted for as service contracts. For internal-use software obtained through a hosting arrangement that is in the nature of a service contract, HP incurs certain implementation costs such as integrating, configuring, and software customization, which are consistent with costs incurred during the application development stage for on-premise software. HP applies the same guidance to determine costs that are eligible for capitalization. For these arrangements, HP amortizes the capitalized development costs straight-line over the fixed, non-cancellable term of the associated hosting arrangement plus any reasonably certain renewal periods. HP also applies the same impairment model to both internal-use software and capitalized implementation costs in a software hosting arrangement that is in the nature of a service contract.
Business Combinations
HP includes the results of operations of the acquired business in HP’s consolidated results prospectively from the acquisition date. HP allocates the purchase consideration to the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in the acquired entity generally based on their fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair value of these assets acquired, liabilities assumed and non-controlling interests in the
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
acquired entity is recorded as goodwill. The primary items that generate goodwill include the value of the synergies between the acquired company and HP and the value of the acquired assembled workforce, neither of which qualify for recognition as an intangible asset. Acquisition-related charges are recognized separately from the business combination and are expensed as incurred. These charges primarily include, direct third-party professional and legal fees, and integration-related costs.
Goodwill
HP reviews goodwill for impairment annually during its fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. HP can elect to perform a qualitative assessment to test a reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment or HP can directly perform the quantitative impairment test. Based on the qualitative assessment, if HP determines that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than 50 percent) to be less than its carrying amount, a quantitative impairment test will be performed.
In the quantitative impairment test, HP compares the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount with the fair values derived most significantly from the income approach, and to a lesser extent, the market approach. Under the income approach, HP estimates the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. HP bases cash flow projections on management’s estimates of revenue growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions. HP bases the discount rate on the weighted-average cost of capital adjusted for the relevant risk associated with business-specific characteristics and the uncertainty related to the reporting unit’s ability to execute on the projected cash flows. Under the market approach, HP estimates fair value based on market multiples of revenue and earnings derived from comparable publicly-traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting unit. HP weights the fair value derived from the market approach depending on the level of comparability of these publicly-traded companies to the reporting unit. When market comparables are not meaningful or not available, HP estimates the fair value of a reporting unit using only the income approach.
In order to assess the reasonableness of the estimated fair value of HP’s reporting units, HP compares the aggregate reporting unit fair value to HP’s market capitalization on an overall basis and calculates an implied control premium (the excess of the sum of the reporting units’ fair value over HP’s market capitalization on an overall basis). HP evaluates the control premium by comparing it to observable control premiums from recent comparable transactions. If the implied control premium is determined to not be reasonable in light of these recent transactions, HP re-evaluates its reporting unit fair values, which may result in an adjustment to the discount rate and/or other assumptions. This re-evaluation could result in a change to the estimated fair value for certain or all reporting units.
If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount of the net assets assigned to that reporting unit, goodwill is not impaired. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, goodwill is impaired and the excess of the reporting unit’s carrying value over the fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.
Debt and Marketable Equity Securities Investments
HP determines the appropriate classification of its investments at the time of purchase and re-evaluates the classifications at each balance sheet date. Debt and marketable equity securities are generally considered available-for-sale. All highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents. Marketable debt securities with maturities of twelve months or less are classified as short-term investments and marketable debt securities with maturities greater than twelve months are classified based on their availability for use in current operations. Marketable equity securities, including mutual funds, are classified as either short-term or long-term based on the nature of each security and its availability for use in current operations.
Debt and marketable equity securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of applicable taxes, in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Consolidated Statement of Earnings and the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are calculated based on the specific identification method and included in interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. HP monitors its investment portfolio for potential impairment on a quarterly basis. When the carrying amount of an investment in debt securities exceeds its fair value and the decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary (i.e., when HP does not intend to sell the debt securities and it is not more likely than not that HP will be required to sell the debt securities prior to anticipated recovery of its amortized cost basis), HP records an impairment charge to Interest and other, net in the amount of the credit loss and the remaining amount, if any, is recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Derivatives
HP uses derivative instruments, primarily forwards, swaps, and at times, options, to hedge certain foreign currency, interest rate, and return on certain investment exposures. HP also may use other derivative instruments not designated as hedges, such as forwards used to hedge foreign currency balance sheet exposures. HP does not use derivative instruments for
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
speculative purposes. See Note 10, “Financial Instruments” for a full description of HP’s derivative instrument activities and related accounting policies.
Loss Contingencies
HP is involved in various lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. HP records a liability for contingencies when it believes it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. See Note 14, “Litigation and Contingencies” for a full description of HP’s loss contingencies and related accounting policies.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 2: Segment Information
HP is a leading global provider of personal computing and other access devices, imaging and printing products, and related technologies, solutions and services. HP sells to individual consumers, SMBs and large enterprises, including customers in the government, health and education sectors.
HP’s operations are organized into three reportable segments: Personal Systems, Printing and Corporate Investments. HP’s organizational structure is based on many factors that the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) uses to evaluate, view and run its business operations, which include, but are not limited to, customer base and homogeneity of products and technology. The segments are based on this organizational structure and information reviewed by HP’s CODM to evaluate segment results. The CODM uses several metrics to evaluate the performance of the overall business, including earnings from operations, and uses these results to allocate resources to each of the segments.
A summary description of each segment is as follows:
Personal Systems offers commercial and consumer desktop and notebook PCs, workstations, thin clients, commercial mobility devices, retail POS systems, displays and other related accessories, software, support and services. HP groups commercial notebooks, commercial desktops, commercial services, commercial mobility devices, commercial detachables and convertibles, workstations, retail POS systems and thin clients into commercial PCs and consumer notebooks, consumer desktops, consumer services and consumer detachables into consumer PCs when describing performance in these markets. Described below are HP’s global business capabilities within Personal Systems:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Commercial PCs are optimized for use by enterprise, public sector and SMB customers, with a focus on robust designs, security, serviceability, connectivity, reliability and manageability in networked and cloud- based environments. Additionally, HP offers a range of services and solutions to enterprise, public sector and SMB customers to help them manage the lifecycle of their PC and mobility installed base.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Consumer PCs are optimized for consumer usage, focusing on gaming, consuming multi-media for entertainment, managing personal life activities, staying connected, sharing information, getting things done for work including creating content, staying informed and security.
|
Personal Systems groups its global business capabilities into the following business units when reporting business performance:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Notebooks consists of consumer notebooks, commercial notebooks, mobile workstations and commercial mobility devices;
|
• Desktops includes consumer desktops, commercial desktops, thin clients, and retail POS systems;
|
|
|
|
•
|
Workstations consists of desktop workstations and accessories; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Other consists of consumer and commercial services as well as other Personal Systems capabilities.
|
Printing provides consumer and commercial printer hardware, supplies, solutions and services, as well as scanning devices. Printing is also focused on imaging solutions in the commercial and industrial markets. Described below are HP’s global business capabilities within Printing.
|
|
|
|
•
|
Office Printing Solutions delivers HP’s office printers, supplies, services and solutions to SMBs and large enterprises. It also includes some Samsung-branded and OEM hardware and solutions. HP goes to market through its extensive channel network and directly with HP sales.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Home Printing Solutions delivers innovative printing products, supplies, services and solutions for the home, home business and micro business customers utilizing both HP’s Ink and Laser technologies (including laser technology from some Samsung-branded products).
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Graphics Solutions delivers large-format, commercial and industrial solutions and supplies to print service providers and packaging converters through a wide portfolio of printers and presses (HP DesignJet, HP Latex, HP Stitch, HP Indigo and HP PageWide Web Presses) and related components.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
3D Printing & Digital Manufacturing offers a portfolio of additive manufacturing solutions and supplies to help customers succeed in their additive and digital manufacturing journey. HP offers complete solutions in collaboration with an ecosystem of partners.
|
Printing groups its global business capabilities into the following business units when reporting business performance:
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)
|
|
|
|
•
|
Commercial Hardware consists of office printing solutions, graphics solutions and 3D Printing & Digital Manufacturing, excluding supplies;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Consumer Hardware consists of home printing solutions, excluding supplies; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Supplies comprises a set of highly innovative consumable products, ranging from ink and laser cartridges to media, graphics supplies and 3D Printing & Digital Manufacturing supplies, for recurring use in consumer and commercial hardware.
|
Corporate Investments includes HP Labs and certain business incubation and investment projects.
The accounting policies HP uses to derive segment results are substantially the same as those used by HP in preparing these financial statements. HP derives the results of the business segments directly from its internal management reporting system.
HP does not allocate certain operating expenses, which it manages at the corporate level, to its segments. These unallocated amounts include certain corporate governance costs and infrastructure investments, stock-based compensation expense, restructuring and other charges, acquisition-related charges and amortization of intangible assets. Pursuant to the adoption of ASU 2017-07 in the first quarter of fiscal year of 2019, HP now reclassifies market-related retirement credits and all other components (excluding the service cost component) of net periodic benefit cost to Interest and other, net in Consolidated Statement of Earnings. HP reflected this change in prior reporting periods on an as-if basis. This adoption did not have a material impact to previously reported segment earnings from operations.
Realignment
Effective at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal year 2019, HP implemented an organizational change to align its business unit financial reporting more closely with its current business structure. The organizational change resulted in the transfer of certain Samsung-branded product categories from Commercial to Consumer within the Printing segment. HP reflected this change to its business unit information in prior reporting periods on an as-if basis. The reporting change had no impact to previously reported segment net revenue, consolidated net revenue, earnings from operations, net earnings or net EPS.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)
Segment Operating Results from Operations and the reconciliation to HP consolidated results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
|
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notebooks
|
$
|
22,928
|
|
|
$
|
22,547
|
|
|
$
|
19,782
|
|
|
Desktops
|
12,046
|
|
|
11,567
|
|
|
10,298
|
|
|
Workstations
|
2,389
|
|
|
2,246
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
Other
|
1,331
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
Personal Systems
|
38,694
|
|
|
37,661
|
|
|
33,321
|
|
|
Supplies
|
12,921
|
|
|
13,575
|
|
|
12,524
|
|
|
Commercial Hardware
|
4,612
|
|
|
4,514
|
|
|
3,792
|
|
|
Consumer Hardware
|
2,533
|
|
|
2,716
|
|
|
2,412
|
|
|
Printing
|
20,066
|
|
|
20,805
|
|
|
18,728
|
|
|
Corporate Investments
|
2
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Total segment net revenue
|
58,762
|
|
|
58,471
|
|
|
52,057
|
|
|
Other
|
(6
|
)
|
|
1
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Total net revenue
|
$
|
58,756
|
|
|
$
|
58,472
|
|
|
$
|
52,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Systems
|
$
|
1,898
|
|
|
$
|
1,402
|
|
|
$
|
1,206
|
|
|
Printing
|
3,202
|
|
|
3,314
|
|
|
3,142
|
|
|
Corporate Investments
|
(96
|
)
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
Total segment earnings from operations
|
$
|
5,004
|
|
|
$
|
4,634
|
|
|
$
|
4,261
|
|
|
Corporate and unallocated costs and other
|
(404
|
)
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
(297
|
)
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
(275
|
)
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
Acquisition-related charges
|
(35
|
)
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
(116
|
)
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
(1,354
|
)
|
|
(818
|
)
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
Total earnings before taxes
|
$
|
2,523
|
|
|
$
|
3,013
|
|
|
$
|
3,276
|
|
Segment Assets
HP allocates assets to its business segments based on the segments primarily benefiting from the assets. Total assets by segment and the reconciliation of segment assets to HP consolidated assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Personal Systems
|
$
|
14,092
|
|
|
$
|
13,447
|
|
|
Printing
|
14,309
|
|
|
13,706
|
|
|
Corporate Investments
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Corporate and unallocated assets
|
5,062
|
|
|
7,464
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
33,467
|
|
|
$
|
34,622
|
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)
Major Customers
No single customer represented 10% or more of HP’s net revenue in any fiscal year presented.
Geographic Information
Net revenue by country is based upon the sales location that predominately represents the customer location. For each of the fiscal years of 2019, 2018 and 2017, other than the United States, no country represented more than 10% of HP net revenue.
Net revenue by country in which HP operates was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
|
|
United States
|
$
|
20,605
|
|
|
$
|
20,602
|
|
|
$
|
19,321
|
|
|
Other countries
|
38,151
|
|
|
37,870
|
|
|
32,735
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
$
|
58,756
|
|
|
$
|
58,472
|
|
|
$
|
52,056
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment by country in which HP operates was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
United States
|
$
|
1,260
|
|
|
$
|
935
|
|
|
Singapore
|
372
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
Other countries
|
1,162
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net
|
$
|
2,794
|
|
|
$
|
2,198
|
|
No single country other than those represented above exceeds 10% or more of HP’s total net property, plant and equipment in any fiscal year presented.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 3: Restructuring and Other Charges
Summary of Restructuring Plans
HP’s restructuring activities in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 summarized by plan were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2020 Plan
|
|
Fiscal 2017 Plan
|
|
Other prior year plans (2)
|
Total
|
|
|
Severance and EER
|
|
Infrastructure and other
|
|
Severance
|
|
Infrastructure and other (1)
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Accrued balance as of October 31, 2016
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
Charges
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
Non-cash and other adjustments
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
6
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
Accrued balance as of October 31, 2017
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
Charges (reversals)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
Non-cash and other adjustments
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
29
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
Accrued balance as of October 31, 2018
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Charges
|
82
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
Non-cash and other adjustments
|
(6
|
)
|
(3
|
)
|
—
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
Accrued balance as of October 31, 2019
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
Total costs incurred to date as of October 31, 2019
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
1,317
|
|
|
$
|
1,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reflected in Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Infrastructure and other includes adjustment of carrying amount of held for sale assets of $52 million in fiscal year 2017 and reversal of adjustments of $29 million for the fiscal year 2018 associated with the consolidation of manufacturing into global hubs.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes prior-year plans which are substantially complete. HP does not expect any further material activity associated with these plans.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Includes reclassification of liability related to the Enhanced Early Retirement (“EER”) plan of $6M for certain healthcare and medical savings account benefits to pension and other post retirement plans. See Note 4 “Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans” for further information.
|
Fiscal 2020 Plan
On September 30, 2019, HP’s Board of Directors approved the Fiscal 2020 Plan intended to optimize and simplify its operating model and cost structure that HP expects will be implemented through fiscal 2022. HP expects to reduce global headcount by approximately 7,000 to 9,000 employees through a combination of employee exits and voluntary EER. HP estimates that it will incur pre-tax charges of approximately $1.0 billion relating to labor and non-labor actions. HP expects to incur approximately $0.9 billion primarily in labor costs related to workforce reductions and the remaining costs will relate to infrastructure, non-labor actions and other charges.
Fiscal 2017 Plan
On October 10, 2016, HP’s Board of Directors approved the Fiscal 2017 Plan, which included severance costs related to labor actions and infrastructure costs related to non-labor actions and other charges. Approximately 5,300 employees exited as part of the Fiscal 2017 Plan. HP incurred $390 million in severance costs and $305 million in infrastructure costs related to non-labor and other charges. The Fiscal 2017 Plan is substantially complete. HP does not expect any further costs associated with the plan.
Other charges
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 3: Restructuring and Other Charges (Continued)
Other charges include non-recurring costs, including those as a result of the Separation or information technology rationalization efforts, and are distinct from ongoing operational costs. These costs primarily relate to information technology costs such as advisory, consulting and non-recurring labor costs. HP incurred $28 million, $33 million and $135 million of other charges in fiscal year 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
Defined Benefit Plans
HP sponsors a number of defined benefit pension plans worldwide. The most significant defined benefit plan, the HP Inc. Pension Plan (“Pension Plan”) is a frozen plan in the United States.
HP reduces the benefit payable to certain U.S. employees under the Pension Plan for service before 1993, if any, by any amounts due to the employee under HP’s frozen defined contribution Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan (“DPSP”). At October 31, 2019 and 2018, the fair value of plan assets of the DPSP was $543 million and $536 million, respectively. The DPSP obligations are equal to the plan assets and are recognized as an offset to the Pension Plan when HP calculates its defined benefit pension cost and obligations. The Pension Plan and the DPSP both remain entirely with HP post-Separation.
Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
HP sponsors retiree health and welfare benefit plans, of which the most significant are in the United States. Under the HP Inc. Retiree Welfare Benefits Plan, certain pre-2003 retirees and grandfathered participants with continuous service to HP since 2002 are eligible to receive partially-subsidized medical coverage based on years of service at retirement. HP’s share of the premium cost is capped for all subsidized medical coverage provided under the HP Inc. Retiree Welfare Benefits Plan. HP currently leverages the employer group waiver plan process to provide HP Inc. Retiree Welfare Benefits Plan post-65 prescription drug coverage under Medicare Part D, thereby giving HP access to federal subsidies to help pay for retiree benefits.
Certain employees not grandfathered for partially subsidized medical coverage under the above programs, and employees hired after 2002 but before August 2008, are eligible for credits under the HP Inc. Retiree Welfare Benefits Plan. Credits offered after September 2008 are provided in the form of matching credits on employee contributions made to a voluntary employee beneficiary association upon attaining age 45 or as part of early retirement programs. On retirement, former employees may use these credits for the reimbursement of certain eligible medical expenses, including premiums required for coverage.
Defined Contribution Plans
HP offers various defined contribution plans for U.S. and non-U.S. employees. Total defined contribution expense was $107 million in fiscal year 2019, $110 million in fiscal year 2018 and $103 million in fiscal year 2017.
U.S. employees are automatically enrolled in the HP Inc. 401(k) Plan when they meet eligibility requirements, unless they decline participation. The employer matching contributions in the HP Inc. 401(k) Plan is 100% of an employee’s contributions, up to a maximum of 4% of eligible compensation.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)
Pension and Post-Retirement Benefit Expense
The components of HP’s pension and post-retirement (credit) benefit cost recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Service cost
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
491
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(581
|
)
|
|
(717
|
)
|
|
(677
|
)
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
Amortization and deferrals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
59
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
Prior service benefit
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
Net periodic (credit) benefit cost
|
(31
|
)
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
72
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
Curtailment gain
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Settlement loss
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total (credit) benefit cost
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(205
|
)
|
|
$
|
(132
|
)
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
(42
|
)
|
|
$
|
(42
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43
|
)
|
The components of net periodic benefit costs other than the service cost component are included in Interest and other, net in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
The weighted-average assumptions used to calculate the total periodic benefit (credit) cost were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
|
|
Discount rate
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
Expected increase in compensation levels
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
Funded Status
The funded status of the defined benefit and post-retirement benefit plans was as follows:
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Change in fair value of plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets — beginning of year
|
$
|
10,018
|
|
|
$
|
10,838
|
|
|
$
|
850
|
|
|
$
|
815
|
|
|
$
|
388
|
|
|
$
|
351
|
|
|
Acquisition/ deletion of plan
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
40
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
2,499
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
85
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
44
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Participant contributions
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
(523
|
)
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
Settlement
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Currency impact
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Transfers
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Fair value of assets — end of year
|
$
|
12,017
|
|
|
$
|
10,018
|
|
|
$
|
969
|
|
|
$
|
850
|
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
|
$
|
388
|
|
|
Change in benefits obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation — beginning of year
|
$
|
11,167
|
|
|
$
|
12,266
|
|
|
$
|
1,227
|
|
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
|
Acquisition/ deletion of plan
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Service cost
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
491
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Participant contributions
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
2,065
|
|
|
(965
|
)
|
|
219
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
Benefits paid
|
(523
|
)
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
Plan amendments
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
Curtailment
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Settlement
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Transfers
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Currency impact
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation — end of year
|
$
|
13,191
|
|
|
$
|
11,167
|
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
|
$
|
1,227
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
Funded status at end of year
|
$
|
(1,174
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,149
|
)
|
|
$
|
(488
|
)
|
|
$
|
(377
|
)
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
$
|
13,191
|
|
|
$
|
11,167
|
|
|
$
|
1,320
|
|
|
$
|
1,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average assumptions used to calculate the projected benefit obligations for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
|
|
Discount rate
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
Expected increase in compensation levels
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
The net amounts of non-current assets and current and non-current liabilities for HP’s defined benefit and post-retirement benefit plans recognized on HP’s Consolidated Balance Sheet were as follows:
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
(36
|
)
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
(1,138
|
)
|
|
(1,117
|
)
|
|
(495
|
)
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
Funded status at end of year
|
$
|
(1,174
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,149
|
)
|
|
$
|
(488
|
)
|
|
$
|
(377
|
)
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
The following table summarizes the pre-tax net actuarial loss (gain) and prior service benefit recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss for the defined benefit and post-retirement benefit plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31, 2019
|
|
|
U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
$
|
1,371
|
|
|
$
|
413
|
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
|
Prior service benefit
|
—
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
Total recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss (gain)
|
$
|
1,371
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
(229
|
)
|
The following table summarizes HP’s pre-tax net actuarial loss (gain) and prior service benefit that are expected to be amortized from Accumulated other comprehensive loss and recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) during the next fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
Prior service benefit
|
—
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
Total expected to be recognized in net periodic benefit cost (credit)
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
Defined benefit plans with projected benefit obligations exceeding the fair value of plan assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Aggregate fair value of plan assets
|
$
|
12,017
|
|
|
$
|
10,018
|
|
|
$
|
905
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
Aggregate projected benefit obligation
|
$
|
13,191
|
|
|
$
|
11,167
|
|
|
$
|
1,410
|
|
|
$
|
1,194
|
|
Defined benefit plans with accumulated benefit obligations exceeding the fair value of plan assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Aggregate fair value of plan assets
|
$
|
12,017
|
|
|
$
|
10,018
|
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
734
|
|
|
Aggregate accumulated benefit obligation
|
$
|
13,191
|
|
|
$
|
11,167
|
|
|
$
|
1,226
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)
Fair Value of Plan Assets
The table below sets forth the fair value of plan assets by asset category within the fair value hierarchy as of October 31, 2019. Refer to Note 9, “Fair Value” for details on fair value hierarchy. Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the Net Asset Value (“NAV”) per share as a practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table provide a reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the total value of plan assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31, 2019
|
|
|
U.S. Defined Benefit Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans
|
|
Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Asset Category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities(1)
|
$
|
697
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
755
|
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
Debt securities(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
—
|
|
|
6,098
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,098
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Government
|
—
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Real Estate Funds
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Insurance Contracts
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Common Collective Trusts and 103-12 Investments Entities(3)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Investment Funds(4)
|
324
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents(5)
|
4
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Other(6)
|
(517
|
)
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
1
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
Net plan assets subject to leveling
|
$
|
508
|
|
|
$
|
8,709
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
9,217
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
647
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments using NAV as a Practical Expedient:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative Investments(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
Common Contractual Funds(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Common Collective Trusts and 103-12 Investment Entities(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Investment Funds(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Investments at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
The table below sets forth the fair value of plan assets by asset category within the fair value hierarchy as of October 31, 2018.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31, 2018
|
|
|
U.S. Defined Benefit Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans
|
|
Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Asset Category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities(1)
|
$
|
794
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
842
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
Debt securities(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
—
|
|
|
4,941
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,941
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Government
|
—
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Real Estate Funds
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Insurance Contracts
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Common Collective Trusts and 103-12s(3)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Investment Funds(4)
|
253
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents(5)
|
5
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Other(6)
|
(108
|
)
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(341
|
)
|
|
2
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
Net plan assets subject to leveling
|
$
|
944
|
|
|
$
|
6,532
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7,476
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
691
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments using NAV as a Practical Expedient:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative Investments(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
Common Contractual Funds(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Common Collective Trusts and 103-12 Investment Entities(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Investment Funds(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Investments at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
388
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Investments in publicly-traded equity securities are valued using the closing price on the measurement date as reported on the stock exchange on which the individual securities are traded.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
The fair value of corporate, government and asset-backed debt securities is based on observable inputs of comparable market transactions. Also included in this category is debt issued by national, state and local governments and agencies.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Department of Labor 103-12 IE (Investment Entity) designation is for plan assets held by two or more unrelated employee benefit plans which includes limited partnerships and venture capital partnerships. Certain common collective trusts and interests in 103-12 entities are valued using NAV as a practical expedient.
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Includes publicly traded funds of investment companies that are registered with the SEC, funds that are not publicly traded and a non-U.S. fund-of-fund arrangement. The non-U.S. fund-of-fund arrangement is a custom portfolio valued at NAV consisting primarily of fixed income and common contractual funds.
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
Includes cash and cash equivalents such as short-term marketable securities. Cash and cash equivalents include money market funds, which are valued based on NAV. Other assets were classified in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input (e.g., quoted prices and observable inputs) that is significant to the fair value measure in its entirety.
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Includes primarily reverse repurchase agreements, unsettled transactions, and derivative instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
Alternative Investments primarily include private equities and hedge funds. The valuation of alternative investments, such as limited partnerships and joint ventures, may require significant management judgment. For alternative investments, valuation is based on NAV as reported by the asset manager or investment company and adjusted for cash flows, if necessary. In making such an assessment, a variety of factors are reviewed by management, including but not limited to the timeliness of NAV as reported by the asset manager and changes in general economic and market conditions subsequent to the last NAV reported by the asset manager.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Private equities include limited partnerships such as equity, buyout, venture capital, real estate and other similar funds that invest in the United States and internationally where foreign currencies are hedged.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Hedge funds include limited partnerships that invest both long and short primarily in common stocks and credit, relative value, event-driven equity, distressed debt and macro strategies. Management of the hedge funds has the ability to shift investments from value to growth strategies, from small to large capitalization stocks and bonds, and
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)
from a net long position to a net short position.
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
The Common Contractual Fund is an investment arrangement in which institutional investors pool their assets. Units may be acquired in different sub-funds focused on equities, fixed income, alternative investments and emerging markets. Each sub-fund is invested in accordance with the fund’s investment objective and units are issued in relation to each sub-fund. While the sub-funds are not publicly traded, the custodian strikes a NAV either once or twice a month, depending on the sub-fund. These assets are valued using NAV as a practical expedient.
|
Plan Asset Allocations
Refer to the fair value hierarchy table above for actual assets allocations across the benefit plans. The weighted-average target asset allocations across the benefit plans represented in the fair value tables above were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 Target Allocation
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
U.S. Defined Benefit Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
|
|
Equity-related investments
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
40.6
|
%
|
|
48.2
|
%
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
70.6
|
%
|
|
36.0
|
%
|
|
36.1
|
%
|
|
Real estate
|
|
—
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
Other
|
|
—
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Investment Policy
HP’s investment strategy is to seek a competitive rate of return relative to an appropriate level of risk depending on the funded status of each plan and the timing of expected benefit payments. The majority of the plans’ investment managers employ active investment management strategies with the goal of outperforming the broad markets in which they invest. Risk management practices include diversification across asset classes and investment styles and periodic rebalancing toward asset allocation targets. A number of the plans’ investment managers are authorized to utilize derivatives for investment or liability exposures, and HP may utilize derivatives to affect asset allocation changes or to hedge certain investment or liability exposures.
The target asset allocation selected for each U.S. plan reflects a risk/return profile HP believes is appropriate relative to each plan’s liability structure and return goals. HP conducts periodic asset-liability studies for U.S. plans to model various potential asset allocations in comparison to each plan’s forecasted liabilities and liquidity needs and to develop a policy glide path which adjusts the asset allocation with funded status. A 2018 asset-liability study reconfirmed the current policy glide path for the U.S. pension plan. Due to higher interest rates at the beginning of fiscal year 2019, the investment portfolio interest rate exposure was increased in accordance with the policy hedge path. HP invests a portion of the U.S. defined benefit plan assets and post-retirement benefit plan assets in private market securities such as private equity funds to provide diversification and a higher expected return on assets.
Outside the United States, asset allocation decisions are typically made by an independent board of trustees for the specific plan. As in the United States, investment objectives are designed to generate returns that will enable the plan to meet its future obligations. In some countries, local regulations may restrict asset allocations, typically leading to a higher percentage of investment in fixed income securities than would otherwise be deployed. HP reviews the investment strategy and provides a recommended list of investment managers for each country plan, with final decisions on asset allocation and investment managers made by the board of trustees for the specific plan.
Basis for Expected Long-Term Rate of Return on Plan Assets
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets reflects the expected returns for each major asset class in which the plan invests and the weight of each asset class in the target mix. Expected asset returns reflect the current yield on government bonds, risk premiums for each asset class and expected real returns which considers each country’s specific inflation outlook. Because HP’s investment policy is to employ primarily active investment managers who seek to outperform the broader market, the expected returns are adjusted to reflect the expected additional returns net of fees.
Retirement Incentive Program
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)
As part of the Fiscal 2020 Plan, HP announced the voluntary EER program for its U.S. employees in October 2019. Voluntary participation in the EER program was limited to those employees who are at least 50 years old with 20 or more years of service at HP. Employees accepted into the EER program will leave HP on dates ranging from December 31, 2019 to September 30, 2020. The EER benefit will be a cash lump sum payment which is calculated based on years of service at HP at the time of the retirement and ranging from 13 to 52 weeks of pay.
All employees participating in the EER program are offered the opportunity to continue health care coverage at the active employee contribution rates for up to 36 months following retirement. In addition, HP is providing up to $12,000 in employer credits under the Retirement Medical Savings Account program. HP will recognize a special termination benefits expense as restructuring and other charges.
Future Contributions and Funding Policy
In fiscal year 2020, HP expects to contribute approximately $76 million to its non-U.S. pension plans, $36 million to cover benefit payments to U.S. non-qualified plan participants and $6 million to cover benefit claims for HP’s post-retirement benefit plans. HP’s policy is to fund its pension plans so that it makes at least the minimum contribution required by local government, funding and taxing authorities.
Estimated Future Benefits Payments
As of October 31, 2019, HP estimates that the future benefits payments for the retirement and post-retirement plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year
|
|
U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Non-U.S.
Defined
Benefit Plans
|
|
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
730
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
2021
|
|
752
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
2022
|
|
769
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
2023
|
|
788
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
2024
|
|
809
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Next five fiscal years to October 31, 2029
|
|
4,020
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
135
|
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 5: Stock-Based Compensation
HP’s stock-based compensation plans include incentive compensation plans and an employee stock purchase plan.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense and Related Income Tax Benefits for Operations
Stock-based compensation expense and the resulting tax benefits for operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
(47
|
)
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
Cash received from option exercises and purchases under the HP Inc. 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2011 ESPP”) was $59 million in fiscal year 2019, $158 million in fiscal year 2018 and $118 million in fiscal year 2017. The benefit realized for the tax deduction from option exercises in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $3 million, $23 million and $15 million, respectively.
Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plans
HP’s stock-based incentive compensation plans include equity plans adopted in 2004 and 2000, as amended and restated (“principal equity plans”), as well as various equity plans assumed through acquisitions under which stock-based awards are outstanding. Stock-based awards granted under the principal equity plans include restricted stock awards, stock options and performance-based awards. Employees meeting certain employment qualifications are eligible to receive stock-based awards. The aggregate number of shares of HP’s stock authorized for issuance under the 2004 principal equity plan is 593.1 million. No further grants may be made under the 2000 principal equity plan and all outstanding awards under this plan will remain outstanding according to the terms of the plan.
Restricted stock awards are non-vested stock awards that may include grants of restricted stock or restricted stock units. Restricted stock awards and cash-settled awards are generally subject to forfeiture if employment terminates prior to the lapse of the restrictions. Such awards generally vest one to three years from the date of grant. During the vesting period, ownership of the restricted stock cannot be transferred. Restricted stock has the same dividend and voting rights as common stock and is considered to be issued and outstanding upon grant. The dividends paid on restricted stock are non-forfeitable. Restricted stock units do not have the voting rights of common stock, and the shares underlying restricted stock units are not considered issued and outstanding upon grant. However, shares underlying restricted stock units are included in the calculation of diluted net EPS. Restricted stock units have forfeitable dividend equivalent rights equal to the dividend paid on common stock. HP expenses the fair value of restricted stock awards ratably over the period during which the restrictions lapse. The majority of restricted stock units issued by HP contain only service vesting conditions. However, starting in fiscal year 2014, HP began granting performance-adjusted restricted stock units that vest only on the satisfaction of both service and the achievement of certain performance goals including market conditions prior to the expiration of the awards.
Stock options granted under the principal equity plans are generally non-qualified stock options, but the principal equity plans permit some options granted to qualify as incentive stock options under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Stock options generally vest over three to four years from the date of grant. The exercise price of a stock option is equal to the closing price of HP’s stock on the option grant date. The majority of stock options issued by HP contain only service vesting conditions. However, starting in fiscal year 2011 through fiscal year 2016, HP granted performance-contingent stock options that vest only on the satisfaction of both service and market conditions prior to the expiration of the awards.
Restricted Stock Units
HP uses the closing stock price on the grant date to estimate the fair value of service-based restricted stock units. HP estimates the fair value of restricted stock units subject to performance-adjusted vesting conditions using a combination of the closing stock price on the grant date and the Monte Carlo simulation model. The weighted-average fair value and the assumptions used to measure the fair value of restricted stock units subject to performance-adjusted vesting conditions in the Monte Carlo simulation model were as follows:
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 5: Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Weighted-average fair value(1)
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
Expected volatility(2)
|
26.5
|
%
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
|
30.5
|
%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate(3)
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
Expected performance period in years(4)
|
2.9
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The weighted-average fair value was based on performance-adjusted restricted stock units granted during the period.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
The expected volatility was estimated using the historical volatility derived from HP’s common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
The risk-free interest rate was estimated based on the yield on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues.
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
The expected performance period was estimated based on the length of the remaining performance period from the grant date.
|
A summary of restricted stock units activity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
30,784
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
31,822
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
28,710
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
Granted
|
17,216
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
16,364
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
15,858
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
Vested
|
(16,934
|
)
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
(15,339
|
)
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
(11,915
|
)
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
(1,106
|
)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
(831
|
)
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
29,960
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
30,784
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
31,822
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
The total grant date fair value of restricted stock units vested in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $273 million, $224 million and $162 million, respectively. As of October 31, 2019, total unrecognized pre-tax stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock units for operations was $267 million, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 1.4 years.
Stock Options
HP utilizes the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula to estimate the fair value of stock options subject to service-based vesting conditions. HP estimates the fair value of stock options subject to performance-contingent vesting conditions using a combination of a Monte Carlo simulation model and a lattice model as these awards contain market conditions. The weighted-average fair value and the assumptions used to measure fair value were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended
October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Weighted-average fair value(1)
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
Expected volatility(2)
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
28.0
|
%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate(3)
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
Expected dividend yield(4)
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
Expected term in years(5)
|
6.0
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The weighted-average fair value was based on stock options granted during the period.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
For all awards granted in fiscal year 2019 and 2018, expected volatility was estimated based on a blended volatility (50% historical volatility and 50% implied volatility from traded options on HP's common stock). For the awards granted in
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 5: Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
fiscal year 2017, expected volatility was estimated using the leverage-adjusted average of the term-matching volatilities of peer companies due to the lack of volume of forward traded options, which precluded the use of implied volatility.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
The risk-free interest rate was estimated based on the yield on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues.
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
The expected dividend yield represents a constant dividend yield applied for the duration of the expected term of the award.
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
For awards subject to service-based vesting, the expected term was estimated using a simplified method; and for performance-contingent awards, the expected term represents an output from the lattice model.
|
A summary of stock options activity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
In
thousands
|
|
|
|
In years
|
|
In
millions
|
|
In
thousands
|
|
|
|
In years
|
|
In
millions
|
|
In
thousands
|
|
|
|
In years
|
|
In
millions
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
7,086
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,067
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,218
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
2,451
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
(2,429
|
)
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,644
|
)
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,407
|
)
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(848
|
)
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
7,093
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
7,086
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
18,067
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest
|
7,093
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
7,084
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
17,692
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
4,707
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
4,707
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
10,898
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value that option holders would have realized had all option holders exercised their options on the last trading day of fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017. The aggregate intrinsic value is the difference between HP’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the fiscal year and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options. The total intrinsic value of options exercised in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $20 million, $109 million and $77 million, respectively. The total grant date fair value of options vested in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $9 million, $12 million and $19 million, respectively.
As of October 31, 2019, total unrecognized pre-tax stock-based compensation expense related to stock options was $8 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average vesting period of 2 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
HP sponsors the 2011 ESPP, pursuant to which eligible employees may contribute up to 10% of base compensation, subject to certain income limits, to purchase shares of HP’s common stock.
Pursuant to the terms of the 2011 ESPP, employees purchase stock under the 2011 ESPP at a price equal to 95% of HP’s closing stock price on the purchase date. No stock-based compensation expense was recorded in connection with those purchases because the criteria of a non-compensatory plan were met. The aggregate number of shares of HP’s stock authorized for issuance under the 2011 ESPP is 100 million.
Shares Reserved
Shares available for future grant and shares reserved for future issuance under the stock-based incentive compensation plans and the 2011 ESPP were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Shares available for future grant
|
265,135
|
|
|
305,767
|
|
|
419,071
|
|
|
Shares reserved for future issuance
|
301,608
|
|
|
343,076
|
|
|
468,531
|
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings
Provision for Taxes
On December 22, 2017, the TCJA was enacted into law. Given the significance of the legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118), which allows registrants to record provisional amounts during a one year “measurement period”.
As of January 31, 2019, HP completed its accounting for the tax effects of the TCJA with no material changes to the provisional amounts recorded during the measurement period.
In January 2018, the FASB released guidance on the accounting for tax on the Global Minimum Tax provisions of TCJA. The Global Minimum Tax provisions impose a tax on foreign income in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. HP has elected to treat Global Minimum Tax inclusions as period costs.
The domestic and foreign components of earnings before taxes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
U.S.
|
$
|
(1,021
|
)
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
3,544
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
3,290
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,523
|
|
|
$
|
3,013
|
|
|
$
|
3,276
|
|
The (benefit from) provision for taxes on earnings was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
U.S. federal taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
$
|
(987
|
)
|
|
$
|
751
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
Deferred
|
149
|
|
|
(3,132
|
)
|
|
197
|
|
|
Non-U.S. taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
386
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
Deferred
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(563
|
)
|
|
4
|
|
|
State taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
(160
|
)
|
|
61
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Deferred
|
(14
|
)
|
|
41
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
$
|
(629
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,314
|
)
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
As a result of U.S. tax reform, HP revised its estimated annual effective tax rate to reflect the change in the U.S. federal statutory tax rate from 35% to 23.3% in fiscal year 2018, under transitional tax rate rules, and 21% in fiscal year 2019.
The differences between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and HP’s effective tax rate were as follows:
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate from operations
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
State income taxes from operations, net of federal tax benefit
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
Impact of foreign earnings, net
|
(6.4
|
)%
|
|
(10.9
|
)%
|
|
(13.2
|
)%
|
|
Foreign-derived intangible income deduction
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Global Minimum Tax
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
U.S. Tax Reform impacts
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
|
(35.8
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Research and development (“R&D”) credit
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
Valuation allowances
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
(9.3
|
)%
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
Uncertain tax positions and audit settlements
|
(41.1
|
)%
|
|
(50.3
|
)%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
Indemnification related items
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
Other, net
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
(24.9
|
)%
|
|
(76.8
|
)%
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
The jurisdictions with favorable tax rates that have the most significant effective tax rate impact in the periods presented include Puerto Rico, Singapore, China, Malaysia and Ireland.
In fiscal year 2019, HP recorded $1.3 billion of net income tax benefits related to discrete items in the provision for taxes. This amount includes tax benefits related to audit settlements of $1.0 billion, $75 million due to ability to utilize tax attributes, $57 million of restructuring benefits and net valuation allowance releases of $94 million. HP also recorded benefits of $78 million related to U.S. tax reform as a result of new guidance issued by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). These benefits were partially offset by uncertain tax position charges of $51 million. In fiscal year 2019, in addition to the discrete items mentioned above, HP recorded excess tax benefits of $20 million associated with stock options, restricted stock units and performance-adjusted restricted stock units.
In fiscal year 2018, HP recorded $2.8 billion of net income tax benefits related to discrete items in the provision for taxes which include impacts of the TCJA. HP had not yet completed its analysis of the full impact of the TCJA. However, as of October 31, 2018, HP recorded a provisional tax benefit of $760 million related to $5.6 billion net benefit for the decrease in its deferred tax liability on unremitted foreign earnings, partially offset by $3.3 billion net expense for the deemed repatriation tax payable in installments over eight years, a $1.2 billion net expense for the remeasurement of its deferred assets and liabilities to the new U.S. statutory tax rate and a $317 million valuation allowance on net expense related to deferred tax assets that are expected to be realized at a lower rate. HP also recorded tax benefits related to audit settlements of $1.5 billion and valuation allowance releases of $601 million pertaining to a change in our ability to utilize certain foreign and U.S. deferred tax assets due to a change in our geographic earnings mix. These benefits were partially offset by other net tax charges of $34 million. In fiscal year 2018, in addition to the discrete items mentioned above, HP recorded excess tax benefits of $42 million associated with stock options, restricted stock units and performance-adjusted restricted stock units.
In fiscal year 2017, HP recorded $72 million of net income tax benefits related to discrete items in the provision for taxes. These amounts primarily include tax benefits of $84 million related to restructuring and other charges, $12 million related to U.S. federal provision to return adjustments, $45 million related to Samsung acquisition-related charges, and $13 million of other net tax benefits. In addition, HP recorded tax charges of $11 million related to changes in state valuation allowances, $22 million of state provision to return adjustments, and $49 million related to uncertain tax positions. In fiscal year 2017, in addition to the discrete items mentioned above, HP recorded excess tax benefits of $19 million associated with stock options, restricted stock units and performance-adjusted restricted stock units, which are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings as a component of the provision for income taxes.
As a result of certain employment actions and capital investments HP has undertaken, income from manufacturing and services in certain countries is subject to reduced tax rates, and in some cases is wholly exempt from taxes, through 2027. The gross income tax benefits attributable to these actions and investments were estimated to be $386 million ($0.25 diluted EPS) in fiscal year 2019, $578 million ($0.35 diluted net EPS) in fiscal year 2018 and $471 million ($0.28 diluted net EPS) in fiscal year 2017.
Uncertain Tax Positions
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)
A reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
7,771
|
|
|
$
|
10,808
|
|
|
$
|
10,858
|
|
|
Increases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For current year’s tax positions
|
79
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
For prior years’ tax positions
|
172
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
Decreases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For prior years’ tax positions
|
(37
|
)
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
Statute of limitations expirations
|
(15
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Settlements with taxing authorities
|
(7,041
|
)
|
|
(2,953
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
929
|
|
|
$
|
7,771
|
|
|
$
|
10,808
|
|
As of October 31, 2019, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $929 million, of which up to $803 million would affect HP’s effective tax rate if realized. As of October 31, 2018, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $7.8 billion of which up to $1.5 billion would affect HP’s effective tax rate if realized. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $6.8 billion primarily related to the resolution of various audits. HP recognizes interest income from favorable settlements and interest expense and penalties accrued on unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. As of October 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, HP had accrued $56 million, $160 million and $257 million, respectively, for interest and penalties.
HP engages in continuous discussion and negotiation with taxing authorities regarding tax matters in various jurisdictions. While HP does not expect complete resolution of certain tax years with various tax authorities in the next 12 months, it is reasonably possible that its existing unrecognized tax benefits may be reduced by an immaterial amount within the next 12 months.
HP is subject to income tax in the United States and approximately 58 other countries and is subject to routine corporate income tax audits in many of these jurisdictions. In addition, HP is subject to numerous ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. The IRS is conducting an audit of HP’s 2016 income tax return.
With respect to major state and foreign tax jurisdictions, HP is no longer subject to tax authority examinations for years prior to 2002. No material tax deficiencies have been assessed in major state or foreign tax jurisdictions as of October 31, 2019.
The U.S. Tax Court ruled in May 2012 against HP related to certain tax attributes claimed by HP for the tax years 1999 through 2003. HP appealed the U.S. Tax Court determination by filing a formal Notice of Appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. This case was argued before the Ninth Circuit in November 2016. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion in November 2017 affirming the Tax Court determinations. In fiscal year 2018, HP decided against further appeal.
HP believes it has provided adequate reserves for all tax deficiencies or reductions in tax benefits that could result from federal, state and foreign tax audits. HP regularly assesses the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of HP’s tax provision. HP adjusts its uncertain tax positions to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular audit. However, income tax audits are inherently unpredictable and there can be no assurance that HP will accurately predict the outcome of these audits. The amounts ultimately paid on resolution of an audit could be materially different from the amounts previously included in the Provision for taxes and therefore the resolution of one or more of these uncertainties in any particular period could have a material impact on net income or cash flows.
HP has not provided for U.S. federal income and foreign withholding taxes on $5.7 billion of undistributed earnings from non-U.S. operations as of October 31, 2019 because HP intends to reinvest such earnings indefinitely outside of the United States. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable. The TCJA taxed HP’s historic earnings and profits of its non-U.S. subsidiaries. HP will remit these taxed reinvested earnings for which deferred U.S. federal and withholding taxes have been provided where excess cash has accumulated and HP determines that it is advantageous for business operations, tax or cash management reasons.
Deferred Income Taxes
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)
The significant components of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and credit carryforwards
|
$
|
7,856
|
|
|
$
|
8,204
|
|
|
Intercompany transactions—excluding inventory
|
714
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
Fixed assets
|
115
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
Warranty
|
195
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
Employee and retiree benefits
|
396
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
Deferred Revenue
|
145
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
Capitalized research and development
|
193
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
420
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Other
|
556
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
Gross Deferred Tax Assets
|
10,590
|
|
|
10,530
|
|
|
Valuation allowances
|
(7,930
|
)
|
|
(7,906
|
)
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets
|
2,660
|
|
|
2,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries
|
(27
|
)
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
Intangible assets
|
—
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
Other
|
(73
|
)
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities
|
(100
|
)
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Assets
|
$
|
2,560
|
|
|
$
|
2,331
|
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
$
|
2,620
|
|
|
$
|
2,431
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
(60
|
)
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
Total
|
$
|
2,560
|
|
|
$
|
2,331
|
|
As of October 31, 2019, HP had recorded deferred tax assets for net operating loss carryforwards as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross NOLs
|
|
Deferred Taxes on NOLs
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
Initial Year of Expiration
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
|
Federal
|
$
|
372
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
2023
|
|
State
|
2,634
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
2019
|
|
Foreign
|
26,317
|
|
|
7,434
|
|
|
(7,357
|
)
|
2021
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
29,323
|
|
|
$
|
7,679
|
|
|
$
|
(7,438
|
)
|
|
As of October 31, 2019, HP had recorded deferred tax assets for various tax credit carryforwards as follows:
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carryforward
|
|
Valuation
Allowance
|
|
Initial
Year of
Expiration
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
|
|
Tax credits in state and foreign jurisdictions
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
(42
|
)
|
|
2021
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance
The deferred tax asset valuation allowance and changes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
7,906
|
|
|
$
|
8,807
|
|
|
$
|
8,520
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
(339
|
)
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
297
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, currency translation and charges to other accounts
|
363
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
|
$
|
7,906
|
|
|
$
|
8,807
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets as of October 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were reduced by valuation allowances of $7.9 billion, $7.9 billion and $8.8 billion, respectively. In fiscal year 2019, the deferred tax asset valuation allowance increased by $24 million primarily associated with the recognition of the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers other than inventory, see Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for detailed information. This increase was partially offset by the impact of tax rate changes in foreign jurisdictions and state valuation allowance releases. In fiscal year 2018, the deferred tax valuation allowance decreased by $901 million primarily associated with foreign net operating losses and U.S. deferred tax assets that are anticipated to be realized at a lower effective rate than the federal statutory tax rate due to certain future U.S. international tax reform implications. In fiscal year 2017, the deferred tax asset valuation allowance increased by $287 million primarily associated with foreign net operating losses.
Note 7: Supplementary Financial Information
Accounts Receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
$
|
6,142
|
|
|
$
|
5,242
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
(111
|
)
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
6,031
|
|
|
$
|
5,113
|
|
The allowance for doubtful accounts related to accounts receivable and changes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
60
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Deductions, net of recoveries
|
(78
|
)
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 7: Supplementary Financial Information (Continued)
HP has third-party arrangements, consisting of revolving short-term financing, which provide liquidity to certain partners to facilitate their working capital requirements. These financing arrangements, which in certain circumstances may contain partial recourse, result in a transfer of HP’s receivables and risk, to the third-party. As these transfers qualify as true sales under the applicable accounting guidance, the receivables are de-recognized from the Consolidated Balance Sheets upon transfer, and HP receives a payment for the receivables from the third-party within a mutually agreed upon time period. For arrangements involving an element of recourse, the recourse obligation is measured using market data from the similar transactions and reported as a current liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The recourse obligations as of October 31, 2019 and 2018 were not material. The costs associated with the sales of trade receivables for fiscal year 2019, 2018 and 2017 were not material.
The following is a summary of the activity under these arrangements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Balance at beginning of year (1)
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
Trade receivables sold
|
10,257
|
|
|
10,224
|
|
|
9,553
|
|
|
Cash receipts
|
(10,186
|
)
|
|
(10,202
|
)
|
|
(9,562
|
)
|
|
Foreign currency and other
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
7
|
|
|
Balance at end of year (1)
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
(1) Amounts outstanding from third parties reported in Accounts Receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Finished goods
|
$
|
3,855
|
|
|
$
|
4,019
|
|
|
Purchased parts and fabricated assemblies
|
1,879
|
|
|
2,043
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,734
|
|
|
$
|
6,062
|
|
Other Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Supplier and other receivables
|
$
|
1,951
|
|
|
$
|
2,025
|
|
|
Prepaid and other current assets
|
967
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
Value-added taxes receivable
|
957
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investments (1)
|
—
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,875
|
|
|
$
|
5,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
See Note 9 “Fair Value” and Note 10, “Financial Instruments” for detailed information.
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 7: Supplementary Financial Information (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Land, buildings and leasehold improvements
|
$
|
1,977
|
|
|
$
|
1,893
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment, including equipment held for lease
|
5,060
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
|
|
7,037
|
|
|
6,109
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
(4,243
|
)
|
|
(3,911
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
2,794
|
|
|
$
|
2,198
|
|
Depreciation expense was $623 million, $448 million and $353 million in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Other Non-Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Deferred tax assets(1)
|
$
|
2,620
|
|
|
$
|
2,431
|
|
|
Tax indemnifications receivable(2)
|
42
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
Intangible assets(3)
|
661
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
Other(4)
|
801
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,124
|
|
|
$
|
5,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
See Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings” for detailed information.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
See Note 15, “Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties” for detailed information.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
See Note 8, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” for detailed information.
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Includes marketable equity securities and mutual funds classified as available-for-sale investments of $56 million and $53 million at October 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. See Note 10, “Financial Instruments” for detailed information
|
Other Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Sales and marketing programs
|
$
|
3,361
|
|
|
$
|
2,758
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
1,178
|
|
|
1,095
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
1,103
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
|
Other accrued taxes
|
1,060
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
Warranty
|
663
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
Tax liability
|
237
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
Other
|
2,541
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,143
|
|
|
$
|
8,852
|
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 7: Supplementary Financial Information (Continued)
Other Non-Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Tax liability(1)
|
$
|
848
|
|
|
$
|
2,063
|
|
|
Pension, post-retirement, and post-employment liabilities
|
1,762
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
1,069
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability(1)
|
60
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
Other
|
848
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,587
|
|
|
$
|
5,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
See Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings” for detailed information.
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Tax indemnifications(1)
|
$
|
(1,186
|
)
|
|
$
|
(662
|
)
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
—
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
Interest expense on borrowings
|
(242
|
)
|
|
(312
|
)
|
|
(309
|
)
|
|
Other, net
|
74
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,354
|
)
|
|
$
|
(818
|
)
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Fiscal year ended October 31, 2019 and 2018, includes an adjustment of $764 million and $676 million respectively, of indemnification receivable, primarily related to resolution of various income tax audit settlements. Fiscal year ended October 31, 2019, also includes an adjustment of $417 million pursuant to the termination of the TMA with Hewlett Packard Enterprise. See Note 15, “Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties” for further information.
|
Net Revenue by Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Americas
|
$
|
25,244
|
|
|
$
|
25,644
|
|
|
$
|
23,891
|
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
20,275
|
|
|
20,470
|
|
|
17,507
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific and Japan
|
13,237
|
|
|
12,358
|
|
|
10,658
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
$
|
58,756
|
|
|
$
|
58,472
|
|
|
$
|
52,056
|
|
Value of Remaining Performance Obligations
As of October 31, 2019, the estimated value of transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations was $4.4 billion. HP expects to recognize approximately $1.8 billion of the unearned amount in next 12 months and $2.6 billion thereafter.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 7: Supplementary Financial Information (Continued)
HP has elected the practical expedients and accordingly does not disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations if:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the contract has an original expected duration of one year or less; or
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the revenue from the performance obligation is recognized over time on an as-invoiced basis when the amount corresponds directly with the value to the customer; or
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the portion of the transaction price that is variable in nature is allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied performance obligation.
|
The remaining performance obligations are subject to change and may be affected by various factors, such as termination of contracts, contract modifications and adjustment for currency.
Costs of Obtaining Contracts
As of October 31, 2019, deferred contract fulfillment and acquisition costs balances were $47 million and $30 million, included in Other Current Assets and Other Non-Current Assets, respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the twelve months ended October 31, 2019, the Company amortized $108 million of these costs.
Contract Liabilities
As of October 31, 2019 and November 1, 2018, HP’s contract liabilities balances were $2.1 billion and $1.9 billion, included in Other Current Liabilities and Other Non-Current Liabilities, respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The increase in the contract liabilities balance for fiscal year 2019 is primarily driven by sales of fixed price support and maintenance services, partially offset by $922 million of revenue recognized that were included in the opening contract liabilities balance as of November 1, 2018.
Note 8: Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
Goodwill allocated to HP’s reportable segments and changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Systems
|
|
Printing
|
|
Total
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2017(1)
|
$
|
2,593
|
|
|
$
|
3,029
|
|
|
$
|
5,622
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
7
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2018(1)
|
2,600
|
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
5,968
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
13
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2019(1)
|
$
|
2,613
|
|
|
$
|
3,759
|
|
|
$
|
6,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $0.8 billion related to Corporate Investments.
|
Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. As of October 31, 2019, our reporting units are consistent with the reportable segments identified in Note 2, “Segment Information”. There were no goodwill impairments in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017. Personal Systems had a negative carrying amount of net assets as of October 31, 2019 and 2018, primarily as a result of a favorable cash conversion cycle.
Intangible Assets
HP’s acquired intangible assets were composed of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31, 2019
|
|
As of October 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Net
|
|
Gross
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Customer contracts, customer lists and distribution agreements
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
Technology, patents and trade name
|
|
652
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
$
|
1,037
|
|
|
$
|
376
|
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
713
|
|
|
$
|
260
|
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 8: Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Continued)
For fiscal year 2019, the increase in gross intangible assets was primarily due to intangible assets resulting from the acquisition of the Apogee group.
The weighted-average useful lives of intangible assets acquired during the period are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Useful Life
|
|
Customer contracts, customer lists and distribution agreements
|
10
|
|
Technology, patents and trade name
|
7
|
As of October 31, 2019, estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets was as follows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year
|
In millions
|
|
2020
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
2021
|
116
|
|
|
2022
|
116
|
|
|
2023
|
114
|
|
|
2024
|
80
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
121
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
661
|
|
Note 9: Fair Value
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Fair Value Hierarchy
HP uses valuation techniques that are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs are developed using market data such as publicly available information and reflect the assumptions market participants would use, while unobservable inputs are developed using the best information available about the assumptions market participants would use. Assets and liabilities are classified in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement:
Level 1—Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2—Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and market-corroborated inputs.
Level 3—Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to observable inputs and lowest priority to unobservable inputs.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 9: Fair Value (Continued)
The following table presents HP’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31, 2019
|
|
As of October 31, 2018
|
|
|
Fair Value
Measured Using
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
Measured Using
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,283
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,283
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,620
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,620
|
|
|
Financial institution instruments
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Government debt(1)
|
2,422
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,422
|
|
|
2,217
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
Financial institution instruments
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Government debt(1)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
Marketable equity securities and Mutual funds
|
6
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
—
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
Other derivatives
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
2,428
|
|
|
$
|
1,725
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,153
|
|
|
$
|
2,270
|
|
|
$
|
2,998
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
5,275
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
—
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
Other derivatives
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
(1) Government debt includes instruments such as U.S. treasury notes, U.S. agency securities and non-U.S. government bonds. Money market funds invested in government debt and trade in active markets are included in Level 1.
Valuation Techniques
Cash Equivalents and Investments: HP holds time deposits, money market funds, mutual funds, other debt securities primarily consisting of corporate and foreign government notes and bonds, and common stock and equivalents. HP values cash equivalents and equity investments using quoted market prices, alternative pricing sources, including net asset value, or models utilizing market observable inputs. The fair value of debt investments was based on quoted market prices or model-driven valuations using inputs primarily derived from or corroborated by observable market data, and, in certain instances, valuation models that utilize assumptions which cannot be corroborated with observable market data.
Derivative Instruments: From time to time, HP uses forward contracts, interest rate and total return swaps and, in the past, option contracts to hedge certain foreign currency interest rate and return on certain investment exposures. HP uses industry standard valuation models to measure fair value. Where applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to present value using market-based observable inputs, including interest rate curves, HP and counterparty credit risk, foreign exchange rates, and forward and spot prices for currencies and interest rates. See Note 10, “Financial Instruments” for a further discussion of HP’s use of derivative instruments.
Other Fair Value Disclosures
Short- and Long-Term Debt: HP estimates the fair value of its debt primarily using an expected present value technique, which is based on observable market inputs using interest rates currently available to companies of similar credit standing for similar terms and remaining maturities, and considering its own credit risk. The portion of HP’s debt that is hedged is reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as an amount equal to the debt’s carrying amount and a fair value adjustment representing changes in the fair value of the hedged debt obligations arising from movements in benchmark interest rates. The fair value of
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 9: Fair Value (Continued)
HP’s short- and long-term debt was $5.4 billion at October 31, 2019 compared to its carrying amount of $5.1 billion at that date. The fair value of HP’s short- and long-term debt was $6.0 billion as compared to its carrying value of $6.0 billion at October 31, 2018. If measured at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, short- and long-term debt would be classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Other Financial Instruments: For the balance of HP’s financial instruments, primarily accounts receivable, accounts payable and financial liabilities included in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities. If measured at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, these other financial instruments would be classified in Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Non-Marketable Equity Investments and Non-Financial Assets: HP’s non-marketable equity investments are measured at cost less impairment, adjusted for observable price changes. HP’s non-financial assets, such as intangible assets, goodwill and property, plant and equipment, are recorded at fair value in the period an impairment charge is recognized. If measured at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets these would generally be classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 10: Financial Instruments
Cash Equivalents and Available-for-Sale Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31, 2019
|
|
As of October 31, 2018
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gain
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Loss
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gain
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Loss
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Cash Equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt
|
$
|
1,283
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,283
|
|
|
$
|
1,620
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,620
|
|
|
Financial institution instruments
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Government debt
|
2,422
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,422
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
Total cash equivalents
|
3,705
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
|
3,996
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,996
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt(1)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
366
|
|
|
Financial institution instruments(1)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Government debt(1)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
313
|
|
|
Marketable equity securities and Mutual funds
|
40
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale investments
|
40
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
764
|
|
|
Total cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments
|
$
|
3,745
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,761
|
|
|
$
|
4,752
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
HP classifies its marketable debt securities as available-for-sale investments within Other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, including those with maturity dates beyond one year, based on their highly liquid nature and availability for use in current operations.
|
All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition are considered cash equivalents. As of October 31, 2019 and 2018, the carrying amount of cash equivalents approximated fair value due to the short period of time to maturity. Interest income related to cash, cash equivalents and debt securities was approximately $80 million in fiscal year 2019, $116 million in fiscal year 2018, and $66 million in fiscal year 2017. The estimated fair value of the available-for-sale investments may not be representative of values that will be realized in the future.
Equity securities in privately held companies are included in Other non-current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These amounted to $46 million and $36 million as of October 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Derivative Instruments
HP uses derivatives to offset business exposure to foreign currency and interest rate risk on expected future cash flows and on certain existing assets and liabilities. As part of its risk management strategy, HP uses derivative instruments, primarily forward contracts, interest rate swaps, total return swaps and, at times, option contracts to hedge certain foreign currency, interest rate and, return on certain investment exposures. HP may designate its derivative contracts as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges and classifies the cash flows with the activities that correspond to the underlying hedged items. Additionally, for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments, HP categorizes those economic hedges as other derivatives. HP recognizes all derivative instruments at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
As a result of its use of derivative instruments, HP is exposed to the risk that its counterparties will fail to meet their contractual obligations. Master netting agreements mitigate credit exposure to counterparties by permitting HP to net amounts due from HP to counterparty against amounts due to HP from the same counterparty under certain conditions. To further limit credit risk, HP has collateral security agreements that allow HP’s custodian to hold collateral from, or require HP to post collateral to, counterparties when aggregate derivative fair values exceed contractually established thresholds which are generally based on the credit ratings of HP and its counterparties. If HP’s or the counterparty’s credit rating falls below a specified credit rating, either party has the right to request full collateralization of the derivatives’ net liability position. The fair value of derivatives with credit contingent features in a net liability position was $45 million and $68 million as of October 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, all of which were fully collateralized within two business days.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 10: Financial Instruments (Continued)
Under HP’s derivative contracts, the counterparty can terminate all outstanding trades following a covered change of control event affecting HP that results in the surviving entity being rated below a specified credit rating. This credit contingent provision did not affect HP’s financial position or cash flows as of October 31, 2019 and 2018.
Fair Value Hedges
HP enters into fair value hedges, such as interest rate swaps, to reduce the exposure of its debt portfolio to changes in fair value resulting from changes in interest rates by achieving a primarily U.S. dollar London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)-based floating interest expense.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, HP recognizes the change in fair value of the derivative instrument, as well as the offsetting change in the fair value of the hedged item, in Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings in the period of change.
Cash Flow Hedges
HP uses forward contracts and at times, option contracts designated as cash flow hedges to protect against the foreign currency exchange rate risks inherent in its forecasted net revenue and, to a lesser extent, cost of revenue and operating expenses. HP’s foreign currency cash flow hedges mature predominantly within twelve months; however, hedges related to long-term procurement arrangements extend several years.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, HP initially records changes in fair value for the effective portion of the derivative instrument in Accumulated other comprehensive loss as a separate component of stockholders’ deficit in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and subsequently reclassifies these amounts into earnings in the period during which the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings. HP reports the effective portion of its cash flow hedges in the same financial statement line item as changes in the fair value of the hedged item.
Other Derivatives
Other derivatives not designated as hedging instruments consist primarily of forward contracts used to hedge foreign currency-denominated balance sheet exposures. HP uses total return swaps to hedge its executive deferred compensation plan liability.
For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, HP recognizes changes in fair value of the derivative instrument, as well as the offsetting change in the fair value of the hedged item, in Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings in the period of change.
Hedge Effectiveness
For interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges, HP measures hedge effectiveness by offsetting the change in fair value of the hedged item with the change in fair value of the derivative. For foreign currency options and forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges, HP measures hedge effectiveness by comparing the cumulative change in fair value of the hedge contract with the cumulative change in fair value of the hedged item, both of which are based on forward rates. HP recognizes any ineffective portion of the hedge in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings in the same period in which ineffectiveness occurs. Amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings in the period they arise.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 10: Financial Instruments (Continued)
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
The gross notional and fair value of derivative instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31, 2019
|
|
As of October 31, 2018
|
|
|
Outstanding
Gross
Notional
|
|
Other
Current
Assets
|
|
Other
Non-Current
Assets
|
|
Other
Current
Liabilities
|
|
Other
Non-Current
Liabilities
|
|
Outstanding
Gross
Notional
|
|
Other
Current
Assets
|
|
Other
Non-Current
Assets
|
|
Other
Current
Liabilities
|
|
Other
Non-Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
$
|
750
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
15,639
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
17,147
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
16,389
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
18,147
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
7,146
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,437
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Other derivatives
|
134
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
7,280
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,559
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
$
|
23,669
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
23,706
|
|
|
$
|
408
|
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
Offsetting of Derivative Instruments
HP recognizes all derivative instruments on a gross basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. HP does not offset the fair value of its derivative instruments against the fair value of cash collateral posted under its collateral security agreements. As of October 31, 2019 and 2018, information related to the potential effect of HP’s master netting agreements and collateral security agreements was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
(ii)
|
|
(iii) = (i)–(ii)
|
|
(iv)
|
|
(v)
|
|
|
|
(vi) = (iii)–(iv)–(v)
|
|
|
Gross Amount
Recognized
|
|
Gross Amount
Offset
|
|
Net Amount
Presented
|
|
Gross Amounts
Not Offset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
Financial
Collateral
|
|
|
|
Net Amount
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
As of October 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets
|
$
|
392
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
392
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
259
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
As of October 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents the cash collateral posted by counterparties as of the respective reporting date for HP’s asset position, net of derivative amounts that could be offset, as of, generally, two business days prior to the respective reporting date.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Represents the collateral posted by HP through re-use of counterparty cash collateral as of the respective reporting date for HP’s liability position, net of derivative amounts that could be offset, as of, generally, two business days prior to the respective reporting date.
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 10: Financial Instruments (Continued)
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings
The pre-tax effect of derivative instruments and related hedged items in a fair value hedging relationship for fiscal years ended October 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative Instruments and Related Hedged Items
|
|
Derivative Instrument
|
|
Location
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Hedged Item
|
|
Location
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(60
|
)
|
|
Fixed-rate debt
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
The pre-tax effect of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships for fiscal years ended October 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI
on Derivatives (Effective Portion)
|
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI
Into Earnings (Effective Portion)
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
(651
|
)
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
(239
|
)
|
|
$
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
Total
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
(651
|
)
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
|
$
|
(258
|
)
|
|
$
|
(199
|
)
|
As of October 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, no portion of the hedging instruments’ gain or loss was excluded from the assessment of effectiveness for fair value or cash flow hedges. Hedge ineffectiveness for fair value and cash flow hedges was not material for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017.
As of October 31, 2019, HP expects to reclassify an estimated accumulated other comprehensive income of approximately $104 million, net of taxes, to earnings within the next twelve months associated with cash flow hedges along with the earnings effects of the related forecasted transactions. The amounts ultimately reclassified into earnings could be different from the amounts previously included in accumulated OCI based on the change of market rate, and therefore could have different impact on earnings.
The pre-tax effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments recognized in Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Gain Recognized in Income on Derivatives
|
|
|
Location
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
$
|
(119
|
)
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
|
Other derivatives
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
14
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 11: Borrowings
Notes Payable and Short-Term Borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Amount
Outstanding
|
|
Weighted-Average
Interest Rate
|
|
Amount
Outstanding
|
|
Weighted-Average
Interest Rate
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
307
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
565
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
Notes payable to banks, lines of credit and other
|
50
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
44
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
U.S. Dollar Global Notes(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Shelf Registration Statement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,350 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.827% in December 2010 at 3.75%, due December 2020
|
$
|
648
|
|
|
$
|
648
|
|
|
$1,250 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.799% in May 2011 at 4.3%, due June 2021
|
667
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
$1,000 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.816% in September 2011 at 4.375%, due September 2021
|
538
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
$1,500 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.707% in December 2011 at 4.65%, due December 2021
|
695
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
$500 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.771% in March 2012 at 4.05%, due September 2022
|
499
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
$1,200 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.863% in September 2011 at 6.0%, due September 2041
|
1,199
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
2012 Shelf Registration Statement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$750 issued at par in January 2014 at three-month USD LIBOR plus 0.94%, due January 2019
|
—
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
$1,250 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.954% in January 2014 at 2.75%, due January 2019
|
—
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
4,246
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
Other, including capital lease obligations, at 0.51%-8.43%, due in calendar years 2019-2029
|
853
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
Fair value adjustment related to hedged debt
|
4
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
Unamortized debt issuance cost
|
(16
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
(307
|
)
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
$
|
4,780
|
|
|
$
|
4,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
HP may redeem some or all of the fixed-rate U.S. Dollar Global Notes at any time in accordance with the terms thereof. The U.S. Dollar Global Notes are senior unsecured debt.
|
In December 2016, HP filed a shelf registration statement (the “2016 Shelf Registration Statement”) with the SEC to enable the company to offer for sale, from time to time, in one or more offerings, an unspecified amount of debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares and warrants.
As disclosed in Note 10, “Financial Instruments”, HP uses interest rate swaps to mitigate some of the exposure of its debt portfolio to changes in fair value resulting from changes in interest rates by achieving a primarily U.S. dollar LIBOR-based floating interest expense. Interest rates shown in the table of long-term debt have not been adjusted to reflect the impact of any interest rate swaps.
As of October 31, 2019, aggregate future maturities of debt at face value (excluding unamortized debt issuance cost of $16 million and discounts on debt issuance of $2 million less fair value adjustment related to hedged debt of $4 million), including capital lease obligations were as follows:
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 11: Borrowings (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year
|
In millions
|
|
2020
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
2021
|
251
|
|
|
2022
|
2,015
|
|
|
2023
|
1,273
|
|
|
2024
|
42
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
1,213
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
5,151
|
|
Extinguishment of Debt
In March 2018, HP commenced and completed a cash tender offer (the “Tender Offer") to purchase approximately $1.85 billion in aggregate principal amount of outstanding U.S. Dollar 4.650% Global Notes due December 9, 2021, 4.375% Global Notes due September 15, 2021 and 4.300% Global Notes due June 1, 2021. In connection with the Tender Offer, HP also solicited consents from holders of its 4.650% Notes due December 2021, (the “4.650% Notes”) to amend the indenture under which the 4.650% Notes were issued to, among other things, eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants of the indenture (the “Proposed Amendments”). Holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding 4.650% Notes consented to the Proposed Amendments, and as a result, a supplemental indenture was executed on March 26, 2018 to effect the Proposed Amendments. This extinguishment of debt resulted in a loss of $126 million, which was recorded as "Interest and other, net" on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the year ended October 31, 2018.
Commercial Paper
As of October 31, 2019, HP maintained two commercial paper programs. HP’s U.S. program provides for the issuance of U.S. dollar-denominated commercial paper up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $6.0 billion. HP’s euro commercial paper program provides for the issuance of commercial paper outside of the United States denominated in U.S. dollars, euros or British pounds up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $6.0 billion or the equivalent in those alternative currencies. The combined aggregate principal amount of commercial paper outstanding under those programs at any one time cannot exceed the $6.0 billion authorized by HP’s Board of Directors.
Credit Facility
As of October 31, 2019, HP maintained a $4.0 billion senior unsecured committed revolving credit facility to support the issuance of commercial paper or for general corporate purposes. Commitments under the revolving credit facility will be available until March 30, 2023. Commitment fees, interest rates and other terms of borrowing under the credit facilities vary based on HP’s external credit ratings. As of October 31, 2019, HP was in compliance with the financial covenants in the credit agreement governing the revolving credit facility.
Available Borrowing Resources
As of October 31, 2019, HP and HP’s subsidiaries had available borrowing resources of $724 million from uncommitted lines of credit in addition to the senior unsecured committed revolving credit facility discussed above.
Note 12: Stockholders’ Deficit
Share Repurchase Program
HP’s share repurchase program authorizes both open market and private repurchase transactions. In fiscal year 2019, HP executed share repurchases of 118 million shares and settled total shares for $2.4 billion. In fiscal year 2018, HP executed share repurchases of 111 million shares and settled total shares for $2.6 billion. In fiscal year 2017, HP executed share repurchases of 80 million shares and settled total shares for $1.4 billion. Share repurchases executed during fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017 included 0.9 million shares, 1.0 million shares, and 1.5 million shares settled in November 2019, November 2018, and November 2017, respectively.
The shares repurchased in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 were all open market repurchase transactions. On June 19, 2018, HP’s Board of Directors authorized $4.0 billion for future repurchases of its outstanding shares of common stock. On September 30, 2019, the Board authorized an additional $5.0 billion for future repurchases of its outstanding shares of common stock. As of October 31, 2019, HP had approximately $6.5 billion remaining under the share repurchase authorizations approved by HP’s Board of Directors.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 12: Stockholders’ Deficit (Continued)
Taxes related to Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended
October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Tax effect on change in unrealized components of available-for-sale debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax (provision) benefit on unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect on change in unrealized components of cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax (provision) benefit on unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period
|
(37
|
)
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
42
|
|
|
Tax provision (benefit) on (gains) losses reclassified into earnings
|
46
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
26
|
|
|
Tax effect on change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit (provision) on (losses) gains arising during the period
|
64
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
Tax provision on amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit
|
(11
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
Tax (provision) benefit on curtailments, settlements and other
|
(104
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
Tax effect on change in cumulative translation adjustment
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Tax (provision) benefit on other comprehensive (loss) income
|
$
|
(42
|
)
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 12: Stockholders’ Deficit (Continued)
Changes and reclassifications related to Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended
October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized components of available-for-sale debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
Losses (gains) reclassified into earnings
|
3
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
|
Change in unrealized components of cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period
|
215
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
(609
|
)
|
|
(Gains) losses reclassified into earnings
|
(334
|
)
|
|
232
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
531
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
Change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses) gains arising during the period
|
(239
|
)
|
|
11
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit(1)
|
32
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Curtailments, settlements and other
|
(62
|
)
|
|
1
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
49
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
Change in cumulative translation adjustment:
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes
|
$
|
(380
|
)
|
|
$
|
573
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
These components are included in the computation of net pension and post-retirement benefit (credit) charges in Note 4,
|
“Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans”.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes as of October 31, 2019 and changes during fiscal year 2019 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized
gains on
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
Net unrealized
gains (losses) on
cash flow
hedges
|
|
Unrealized
components
of defined
benefit plans
|
|
Change in cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
291
|
|
|
$
|
(1,141
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(845
|
)
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
|
1
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
4
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
Reclassifications of losses (gains) into earnings
|
3
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
Reclassifications of curtailments, settlements and other into earnings
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
(1,410
|
)
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
(1,225
|
)
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 13: Earnings Per Share
HP calculates basic net EPS using net earnings and the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net EPS includes any dilutive effect of restricted stock units, stock options, performance-based awards and shares purchased under the 2011 employee stock purchase plan.
A reconciliation of the number of shares used for basic and diluted net EPS calculations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended
October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
In millions, except per share amounts
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
$
|
3,152
|
|
|
$
|
5,327
|
|
|
$
|
2,526
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used to compute basic net EPS
|
1,515
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of employee stock plans
|
9
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used to compute diluted net EPS
|
1,524
|
|
|
1,634
|
|
|
1,702
|
|
|
Net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
3.30
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
2.07
|
|
|
$
|
3.26
|
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive weighted-average stock-based compensation awards(1)
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
HP excludes from the calculation of diluted net EPS stock options and restricted stock units where the assumed proceeds exceed the average market price, because their effect would be anti-dilutive. The assumed proceeds of a stock option include the sum of its exercise price, and average unrecognized compensation cost. The assumed proceeds of a restricted stock unit represent unrecognized compensation cost.
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies
HP is involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including those identified below, consisting of IP, commercial, securities, employment, employee benefits and environmental matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. HP accrues a liability when management believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. HP believes it has recorded adequate provisions for any such matters and, as of October 31, 2019, it was not reasonably possible that a material loss had been incurred in excess of the amounts recognized in HP’s financial statements. HP reviews these matters at least quarterly and adjusts its accruals to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, HP shares responsibility with Hewlett Packard Enterprise for certain matters, as indicated below, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise has agreed to indemnify HP in whole or in part with respect to certain matters. Based on its experience, HP believes that any damage amounts claimed in the specific matters discussed below are not a meaningful indicator of HP’s potential liability. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. However, HP believes it has valid defenses with respect to legal matters pending against it. Nevertheless, cash flows or results of operations could be materially affected in any particular period by the resolution of one or more of these contingencies.
Litigation, Proceedings and Investigations
Copyright Levies. Proceedings are ongoing or have been concluded involving HP in certain European countries, including litigation in Belgium and other countries, seeking to impose or modify levies upon IT equipment (such as multifunction devices (“MFDs”) and PCs), alleging that these devices enable the production of private copies of copyrighted materials. The levies are generally based upon the number of products sold and the per-product amounts of the levies, which vary. Some European countries that do not yet have levies on digital devices are expected to implement similar legislation to enable them to extend existing levy schemes, while other European countries have phased out levies or are expected to limit the scope of levy schemes and applicability in the digital hardware environment, particularly with respect to sales to business users. HP, other companies and various industry associations have opposed the extension of levies to the digital environment and have advocated alternative models of compensation to rights holders.
Reprobel, a collecting society administering the remuneration for reprography to Belgian copyright holders, requested by extrajudicial means that HP amend certain copyright levy declarations submitted for inkjet MFDs sold in Belgium from January 2005 to December 2009 to enable it to collect copyright levies calculated based on the generally higher copying speed when the MFDs are operated in draft print mode rather than when operated in normal print mode. In March 2010, HP filed a lawsuit against Reprobel in the Court of First Instance of Brussels seeking a declaratory judgment that no copyright levies are payable on sales of MFDs in Belgium or, alternatively, that payments already made by HP are sufficient to comply with its obligations. The Court of Appeal in Brussels (the “Court of Appeal”) stayed the proceedings and referred several questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”). On November 12, 2015, the CJEU published its judgment providing that a national legislation such as the Belgian one at issue in the main proceedings is incompatible with EU law on multiple legal points, as argued by HP, and returned the proceedings to the referring court. On May 12, 2017, the Court of Appeal held that (1) reprographic copyright levies are due notwithstanding the lack of conformity of the Belgian system with EU law in certain aspects and (2) the applicable levies are to be calculated based on the objective speed of each MFD as established by an expert appointed by the Court of Appeal. HP appealed this decision before the Belgian Supreme Court on January 18, 2018.
Based on industry opposition to the extension of levies to digital products, HP’s assessments of the merits of various proceedings and HP’s estimates of the number of units impacted and the amounts of the levies, HP has accrued amounts that it believes are adequate to address the ongoing disputes.
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Oracle Corporation. On June 15, 2011, HP filed suit against Oracle Corporation (“Oracle”) in California Superior Court in Santa Clara County in connection with Oracle’s March 2011 announcement that it was discontinuing software support for HP’s Itanium-based line of mission critical servers. HP asserted, among other things, that Oracle’s actions breached the contract that was signed by the parties as part of the settlement of the litigation relating to Oracle’s hiring of Mark Hurd. The matter eventually progressed to trial, which was bifurcated into two phases. HP prevailed in the first phase of the trial, in which the court ruled that the contract at issue required Oracle to continue to offer its software products on HP’s Itanium-based servers for as long as HP decided to sell such servers. The second phase of the trial was then postponed by Oracle’s appeal of the trial court’s denial of Oracle’s “anti-SLAPP” motion, in which Oracle argued that HP’s damages claim infringed on Oracle’s First Amendment rights. On August 27, 2015, the California Court of Appeals rejected Oracle’s appeal. The matter was remanded to the trial court for the second phase of the trial, which began on May 23, 2016 and was submitted to the jury on June 29, 2016. On June 30, 2016, the jury returned a verdict in favor of HP, awarding HP
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)
approximately $3.0 billion in damages, which included approximately $1.7 billion for past lost profits and $1.3 billion for future lost profits. On October 20, 2016, the court entered judgment for HP for this amount with interest accruing until the judgment is paid. Oracle’s motion for new trial was denied on December 19, 2016, and Oracle filed its notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment on January 17, 2017. On February 2, 2017, HP filed a notice of cross-appeal challenging the trial court’s denial of prejudgment interest. The case is fully briefed and awaiting the Court of Appeals to schedule oral argument. HP expects that the appeals process could take several years to complete. Litigation is unpredictable, and there can be no assurance that HP will recover damages, or that any award of damages will be for the amount awarded by the jury’s verdict. The amount ultimately awarded, if any, would be recorded in the period received. No adjustment has been recorded in the financial statements in relation to this potential award. Pursuant to the terms of the separation and distribution agreement, HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise will share equally in any recovery from Oracle once Hewlett Packard Enterprise has been reimbursed for all costs incurred in the prosecution of the action prior to the Separation.
Forsyth, et al. vs. HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise. This is a purported class and collective action filed on August 18, 2016 in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, against HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise alleging the defendants violated the Federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, California public policy and the California Business and Professions Code by terminating older workers and replacing them with younger workers. Plaintiffs seek to certify a nationwide collective class action under the ADEA comprised of all U.S. residents employed by defendants who had their employment terminated pursuant to a workforce reduction (“WFR”) plan on or after May 23, 2012 and who were 40 years of age or older. Plaintiffs also seek to represent a Rule 23 class under California law comprised of all persons 40 years or older employed by defendants in the state of California and terminated pursuant to a WFR plan on or after May 23, 2012. Following a partial motion to dismiss, a motion to strike and a motion to compel arbitration that the defendants filed in November 2016, the plaintiffs amended their complaint. New plaintiffs were added, but the plaintiffs agreed that the class period for the nationwide collective action should be shortened and now starts on December 9, 2014. On January 30, 2017, the defendants filed another partial motion to dismiss and motions to compel arbitration as to several of the plaintiffs. On March 20, 2017, the defendants filed additional motions to compel arbitration as to a number of the opt-in plaintiffs. On September 20, 2017, the Court granted the motions to compel arbitration as to the plaintiffs and opt-ins who signed WFR release agreements, and also stayed the entire case until the arbitrations are completed. On November 30, 2017, three named plaintiffs and twelve opt-in plaintiffs filed a single arbitration demand. An additional arbitration claimant was added later by stipulation. On December 22, 2017, the defendants filed a motion to (1) stay the case pending arbitrations and (2) enjoin the demanded arbitration and require each plaintiff to file a separate arbitration demand. On February 6, 2018, the Court granted the motion to stay and denied the motion to enjoin. Pre-arbitration mediation proceedings took place on October 4 and 5, 2018, and the claims of all 16 arbitration claimants were resolved. Between November 2018 and April 2019, an additional 154 individuals filed consents to opt‐in to the action as party‐plaintiffs. Of the new opt-ins, 145 signed separation agreements that include class waivers and mandatory arbitration provisions. The addition of these opt-ins brings the total number of named and opt-in plaintiffs to 193. Mediation proceedings took place in June 2019 with respect to the 145 opt-ins who signed separation agreements, and the parties are continuing to engage in settlement discussions. The stay of the litigation remains in place.
Jackson, et al. v. HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise. This putative nationwide class action was filed on July 24, 2017 in federal district court in San Jose, California. The plaintiffs purport to bring the lawsuit on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated African-Americans and individuals over the age of 40. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants engaged in a pattern and practice of racial and age discrimination in lay-offs and promotions. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on September 29, 2017. On January 12, 2018, the defendants moved to transfer the matter to the federal district court in the Northern District of Georgia. The defendants also moved to dismiss the claims on various grounds and to strike certain aspects of the proposed class definition. The Court dismissed the action on the basis of improper venue. On July 23, 2018, the plaintiffs refiled the case in the Northern District of Georgia. On August 9, 2018, the plaintiffs also filed a notice of appeal of the dismissal order with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On October 1, 2018, the Georgia court granted the plaintiffs’ unopposed motion to stay and administratively close the Georgia action until the Ninth Circuit appeal is decided.
India Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Proceedings. On April 30 and May 10, 2010, the India Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (the “DRI”) issued show cause notices to Hewlett-Packard India Sales Private Limited (“HP India”), a subsidiary of HP, seven HP India employees and one former HP India employee alleging that HP India underpaid customs duties while importing products and spare parts into India and seeking to recover an aggregate of approximately $370 million, plus penalties. Prior to the issuance of the show cause notices, HP India deposited approximately $16 million with the DRI and agreed to post a provisional bond in exchange for the DRI’s agreement to not seize HP India products and spare parts and to not interrupt the transaction of business by HP India.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)
On April 11, 2012, the Bangalore Commissioner of Customs issued an order on the products-related show cause notice affirming certain duties and penalties against HP India and the named individuals of approximately $386 million, of which HP India had already deposited $9 million. On December 11, 2012, HP India voluntarily deposited an additional $10 million in connection with the products-related show cause notice. The differential duty demand is subject to interest. On April 20, 2012, the Commissioner issued an order on the parts-related show cause notice affirming certain duties and penalties against HP India and certain of the named individuals of approximately $17 million, of which HP India had already deposited $7 million. After the order, HP India deposited an additional $3 million in connection with the parts-related show cause notice so as to avoid certain penalties.
HP India filed appeals of the Commissioner’s orders before the Customs Tribunal along with applications for waiver of the pre-deposit of remaining demand amounts as a condition for hearing the appeals. The Customs Department has also filed cross-appeals before the Customs Tribunal. On January 24, 2013, the Customs Tribunal ordered HP India to deposit an additional $24 million against the products order, which HP India deposited in March 2013. The Customs Tribunal did not order any additional deposit to be made under the parts order. In December 2013, HP India filed applications before the Customs Tribunal seeking early hearing of the appeals as well as an extension of the stay of deposit as to HP India and the individuals already granted until final disposition of the appeals. On February 7, 2014, the application for extension of the stay of deposit was granted by the Customs Tribunal until disposal of the appeals. On October 27, 2014, the Customs Tribunal commenced hearings on the cross-appeals of the Commissioner’s orders. The Customs Tribunal rejected HP India’s request to remand the matter to the Commissioner on procedural grounds. The hearings scheduled to reconvene on April 6, 2015 and again on November 3, 2015 and April 11, 2016 were canceled at the request of the Customs Tribunal. A hearing on the merits of the appeal scheduled for January 15, 2019 has been cancelled. Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, Hewlett Packard Enterprise has agreed to indemnify HP in part, based on the extent to which any liability arises from the products and spare parts of Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s businesses.
Neodron Patent Litigation. United States. On May 21, 2019, Neodron Ltd. (“Neodron”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Hewlett Packard Enterprise in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. On the same day, Neodron filed a companion complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 against seven sets of respondents, including Hewlett Packard Enterprise. On May 23 and June 14, 2019, Neodron filed amended complaints in the ITC and the Western District of Texas, respectively, to replace Hewlett Packard Enterprise with HP. Both complaints allege that certain touch-controlled devices infringe four patents owned by Neodron. On June 19, 2019, the ITC instituted an investigation. The ITC hearing is scheduled to begin on March 23, 2020, and the ITC’s target date for completion of the investigation is October 26, 2020. The district court action is stayed pending resolution of the ITC proceedings. In the ITC proceeding, Neodron seeks an order enjoining HP from importing, selling for importation, or selling after importation certain touch-controlled notebook computers and tablets. On June 28, 2019, Neodron filed a second lawsuit in the Western District of Texas, asserting four additional patents against HP touch-controlled devices. Neodron amended its complaint in the second lawsuit to assert a total of eight patents against HP touch-controlled devices. Neodron seeks unspecified damages and a permanent injunction, among other remedies.
Germany. On October 29, 2019, Neodron served HP with a claim of patent infringement at the Munich State Court in Germany. The patent asserted in the German case is related to a patent asserted in the ITC. This case will consist of an initial hearing in March 2020 and formal hearing in late 2020. If the German court finds infringement of a valid patent, the court may issue an injunction as part of any remedy.
Slingshot Printing LLC Litigation. On June 11, 2019, Slingshot Printing LLC filed three complaints in U.S. District Court in the Western District of Texas alleging HP infringes or has infringed sixteen patents. On September 20, 2019, Slingshot filed a fourth complaint and amended the three earlier complaints, alleging that HP infringes or has infringed thirty-two patents. The accused products include inkjet printers, cartridges, and printheads. The complaints seek monetary damages.
Parziale v. HP, Inc. On August 27, 2019, a purported consumer class action was filed against HP arising out of the supplies authentication protocol in certain OfficeJet printers. The complaint, which was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, captioned Parziale v. HP, Inc., alleges two causes of action under Florida Consumer Protection statutes: (1) violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, F.S.A. §§ 501.201 et seq., and (2) violation of the Florida Misleading Advertisement Law, F.S.A. §§ 817.41 et seq. The named plaintiff, a Florida resident who purchased OfficeJet printers in Florida, seeks to represent a nationwide class of “[a]ll United States Citizens who, between the applicable statute of limitations and the present, had an HP Printer that was modified to reject third party ink cartridges or refilled HP ink cartridges.” On October 30, 2019, HP moved to dismiss the complaint. On November 13, 2019, plaintiff filed an
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)
amended complaint, adding the following new causes of action to the case: (1) violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1030 et seq., (2) trespass to chattels, and (3) tortious interference with business relations.
Autonomy-Related Legal Matters
Investigations. As a result of the findings of an ongoing investigation, HP has provided information to the U.K. Serious Fraud Office, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the SEC related to the accounting improprieties, disclosure failures and misrepresentations at Autonomy that occurred prior to and in connection with HP’s acquisition of Autonomy. On January 19, 2015, the U.K. Serious Fraud Office notified HP that it was closing its investigation and had decided to cede jurisdiction of the investigation to the U.S. authorities. On November 14, 2016, the DOJ announced that a federal grand jury indicted Sushovan Hussain, the former CFO of Autonomy. Mr. Hussain was charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, securities fraud, and multiple counts of wire fraud. The indictment alleged that Mr. Hussain engaged in a scheme to defraud purchasers and sellers of securities of Autonomy and HP about the true performance of Autonomy’s business, its financial condition, and its prospects for growth. A jury trial commenced on February 26, 2018. On April 30, 2018, the jury found Mr. Hussain guilty of all charges against him. On November 15, 2016, the SEC announced that Stouffer Egan, the former CEO of Autonomy’s U.S.-based operations, settled charges relating to his participation in an accounting scheme to meet internal sales targets and analyst revenue expectations. On November 29, 2018, the DOJ announced that a federal grand jury indicted Michael Lynch, former CEO of Autonomy, and Stephen Chamberlain, former VP of Finance of Autonomy. Dr. Lynch and Mr. Chamberlain were charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and multiple counts of wire fraud. HP is continuing to cooperate with the ongoing enforcement actions.
Autonomy Corporation Limited v. Michael Lynch and Sushovan Hussain. On April 17, 2015, four former HP subsidiaries that became subsidiaries of Hewlett Packard Enterprise at the time of the Separation (Autonomy Corporation Limited, Hewlett Packard Vision BV, Autonomy Systems, Limited, and Autonomy, Inc.) initiated civil proceedings in the U.K. High Court of Justice against two members of Autonomy’s former management, Michael Lynch and Sushovan Hussain. The Particulars of Claim seek damages in excess of $5 billion from Messrs. Lynch and Hussain for breach of their fiduciary duties by causing Autonomy group companies to engage in improper transactions and accounting practices. On October 1, 2015, Messrs. Lynch and Hussain filed their defenses. Mr. Lynch also filed a counterclaim against Autonomy Corporation Limited seeking $160 million in damages, among other things, for alleged misstatements regarding Lynch. The Hewlett Packard Enterprise subsidiary claimants filed their replies to the defenses and the asserted counter-claim on March 11, 2016. The parties are actively engaged in the disclosure process. Trial began on March 25, 2019 and is scheduled to continue through the remainder of 2019.
Environmental
HP’s business is subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations that could result in costs or other sanctions that adversely affect our business and results of operations. For example, HP is subject to laws and regulations concerning environmental protection, including laws addressing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the clean-up of contaminated sites, the content of HP’s products and the recycling, treatment and disposal of those products, including batteries. In particular, HP faces increasing complexity in its product design and procurement operations as it adjusts to new and future requirements relating to the chemical and materials composition of its products, their safe use, the energy consumption associated with those products, climate change laws and regulations, and product repairability, reuse and take-back legislation. HP could incur substantial costs, its products could be restricted from entering certain jurisdictions, and it could face other sanctions, if it were to violate or become liable under environmental laws or if its products become noncompliant with environmental laws. HP’s potential exposure includes fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party property damage or personal injury claims and clean-up costs. The amount and timing of costs to comply with environmental laws are difficult to predict.
HP is party to, or otherwise involved in, proceedings brought by U.S. or state environmental agencies under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), known as “Superfund,” or state laws similar to CERCLA, and may become a party to, or otherwise involved in, proceedings brought by private parties for contribution towards clean-up costs. HP is also conducting environmental investigations or remediations at several current or former operating sites pursuant to administrative orders or consent agreements with state environmental agencies.
The separation and distribution agreement includes provisions that provide for the allocation of environmental liabilities between HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise including certain remediation obligations; responsibilities arising from the chemical and materials composition of their respective products, their safe use and their energy consumption; obligations under product take back legislation that addresses the collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of products; and other
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)
environmental matters. HP will generally be responsible for environmental liabilities related to the properties and other assets, including products, allocated to HP under the separation and distribution agreement and other ancillary agreements. Under these agreements, HP will indemnify Hewlett Packard Enterprise for liabilities for specified ongoing remediation projects, subject to certain limitations, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a payment obligation for a specified portion of the cost of those remediation projects. In addition, HP will share with Hewlett Packard Enterprise other environmental liabilities as set forth in the separation and distribution agreement. HP is indemnified in whole or in part by Hewlett Packard Enterprise for liabilities arising from the assets assigned to Hewlett Packard Enterprise and for certain environmental matters as detailed in the separation and distribution agreement.
Note 15: Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties
Guarantees
In the ordinary course of business, HP may issue performance guarantees to certain of its clients, customers and other parties pursuant to which HP has guaranteed the performance obligations of third parties. Some of those guarantees may be backed by standby letters of credit or surety bonds. In general, HP would be obligated to perform over the term of the guarantee in the event a specified triggering event occurs as defined by the guarantee. HP believes the likelihood of having to perform under a material guarantee is remote.
Cross-Indemnifications with Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Under the separation and distribution agreement, HP agreed to indemnify Hewlett Packard Enterprise, each of its subsidiaries and each of their respective directors, officers and employees from and against all liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from, among other matters, the liabilities allocated to HP as part of the Separation. Hewlett Packard Enterprise similarly agreed to indemnify HP, each of its subsidiaries and each of their respective directors, officers and employees from and against all liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from, among other matters, the liabilities allocated to Hewlett Packard Enterprise as part of the Separation. HP expects Hewlett Packard Enterprise to fully perform under the terms of the separation and distribution agreement.
For information on cross-indemnifications with Hewlett Packard Enterprise for litigation matters, see Note 14, “Litigation and Contingencies”.
In connection with the Separation, HP entered into the TMA with Hewlett Packard Enterprise, effective on November 1, 2015. The TMA provided that HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise will share certain pre-Separation income tax liabilities. The TMA was terminated during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019.
Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, HP enters into contractual arrangements under which HP may agree to indemnify a third party to such arrangement from any losses incurred relating to the services they perform on behalf of HP or for losses arising from certain events as defined within the particular contract, which may include, for example, litigation or claims relating to past performance. HP also provides indemnifications to certain vendors and customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the vendors’ and customers’ use of HP’s software products and services and certain other matters. Some indemnifications may not be subject to maximum loss clauses. Historically, payments made related to these indemnifications have been immaterial.
HP records tax indemnification receivables from various third parties for certain tax liabilities that HP is jointly and severally liable for, but for which it is indemnified by those same third parties under existing legal agreements. HP records a tax indemnification payable to various third parties under these agreements when management believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The actual amount that the parties pay or may be obligated to pay could vary depending on the outcome of certain unresolved tax matters, which may not be resolved for several years. The net payable and net receivable as of October 31, 2019 and October 31, 2018 were $57 million and $1.0 billion, respectively. During fiscal year 2019, $1.0 billion of indemnification receivables was reduced primarily due to resolution of various tax matters amounting to $0.8 billion.
Warranties
HP accrues the estimated cost of product warranties at the time it recognizes revenue. HP engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of its component suppliers; however, contractual warranty terms, repair costs, product call rates, average cost per call, current period product shipments and ongoing product failure rates, as well as specific product class failures outside of HP’s baseline experience, affect the estimated warranty obligation.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 15: Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties (Continued)
HP’s aggregate product warranty liabilities and changes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended October 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
915
|
|
|
$
|
898
|
|
|
Accruals for warranties issued
|
1,051
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
Adjustments related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates)
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
Settlements made (in cash or in kind)
|
(1,041
|
)
|
|
(1,010
|
)
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
922
|
|
|
$
|
915
|
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 16: Commitments
Lease Commitments
HP leases certain real and personal property under non-cancelable operating leases. Certain leases require HP to pay property taxes, insurance and routine maintenance and include renewal options and escalation clauses. Rent expense was approximately $0.2 billion in each of fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017.
As of October 31, 2019, future minimum operating lease commitments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year
|
In millions
|
|
2020
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
2021
|
242
|
|
|
2022
|
192
|
|
|
2023
|
162
|
|
|
2024
|
126
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
438
|
|
|
Less: Sublease rental income
|
(130
|
)
|
|
Total
|
$
|
1,340
|
|
Unconditional Purchase Obligations
As of October 31, 2019, HP had unconditional purchase obligations of $372 million. These unconditional purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on HP and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased, fixed, minimum or variable price provisions and the approximate timing of the transaction. These unconditional purchase obligations are primarily related to inventory and service support. Unconditional purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty.
As of October 31, 2019, unconditional purchase obligations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year
|
In millions
|
|
2020
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
2021
|
111
|
|
|
2022
|
67
|
|
|
2023
|
18
|
|
|
2024
|
—
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
—
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
372
|
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 17: Acquisitions
Acquisitions in Fiscal Year 2019
On November 1, 2018, HP completed the acquisition of the Apogee group. This acquisition furthers HP’s plan to disrupt the A3 copier market and builds on its printing strategy to enhance its A3 and A4 product portfolio; build differentiated solutions and tools to expand its MPS, and invest in its direct and indirect go-to-market capabilities. Apogee augments HP’s services portfolio in contractual office printing and MPS, where solutions are increasingly important for SMBs. HP reports the financial results of the above business in the Printing segment.
The table below presents the purchase price allocation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Goodwill
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets
|
292
|
|
|
Net liabilities assumed
|
(196
|
)
|
|
Total fair value of consideration
|
$
|
478
|
|
Acquisitions in Fiscal Year 2018
On November 1, 2017, HP completed the acquisition of Samsung’s printer business. With this acquisition, HP now offers the industry’s strongest portfolio of A3 multifunction printers that deliver the simplicity of printers with the high performance of copiers. The fully integrated portfolio, including next-generation PageWide technologies, offers opportunities to grow managed print and document services as sales models shift from transactional to contractual. HP reports the financial results of the above business in the Printing segment.
The table below presents the purchase price allocation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Goodwill
|
$
|
339
|
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets
|
521
|
|
|
Net assets assumed
|
191
|
|
|
Total fair value of consideration
|
$
|
1,051
|
|
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Quarterly Summary
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three-month fiscal periods
ended in fiscal year 2019
|
|
|
January 31
|
|
April 30
|
|
July 31
|
|
October 31
|
|
Net revenue
|
$
|
14,710
|
|
|
$
|
14,036
|
|
|
$
|
14,603
|
|
|
$
|
15,407
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
12,098
|
|
|
11,307
|
|
|
11,698
|
|
|
12,483
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
926
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
$
|
803
|
|
|
$
|
782
|
|
|
$
|
1,179
|
|
|
$
|
388
|
|
|
Net earnings per share:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per share
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three-month fiscal periods
ended in fiscal year 2018
|
|
|
January 31
|
|
April 30
|
|
July 31
|
|
October 31
|
|
Net revenue
|
$
|
14,517
|
|
|
$
|
14,003
|
|
|
$
|
14,586
|
|
|
$
|
15,366
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
11,935
|
|
|
11,301
|
|
|
11,898
|
|
|
12,669
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
913
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
$
|
1,938
|
|
|
$
|
1,058
|
|
|
$
|
880
|
|
|
$
|
1,451
|
|
|
Net earnings per share:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per share
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Net EPS for each quarter is computed using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during that quarter, while EPS for the fiscal year is computed using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the year. Hence, the sum of the EPS for each of the four quarters may not equal the EPS for the fiscal year.
|