By Mike Colias and Nora Naughton
Even as General Motors Co. and the United Auto Workers union
come closer to resolving their biggest work confrontation in
decades, a larger, unsettled issue is the inevitable pain for U.S.
workers from GM's long-range bet on electric cars.
GM's need to free up cash to invest in electrics has led it to
make deep costs in its core business, including its decision to
close four U.S. factories -- a main point of friction in the
longest walkout at GM since 1970.
For the UAW, there's no avoiding the harsh reality of a wider
transition taking hold across the auto industry: Building electric
vehicles requires far fewer workers, making it near-impossible to
avoid job losses and wage cuts. In addition, fewer components are
needed, and many of them are imported.
That means the union, which represents about 225,000 workers at
U.S. auto makers and suppliers, faces a fight to play a central
role in the industry's electric-focused future.
The engine and transmission have long been at the heart of the
automobile -- and a sector employing hundreds of thousands in the
U.S. But electric cars have fewer moving parts and are less complex
to assemble, requiring roughly 30% fewer workers to build compared
with a gas-engine vehicle, analysts and industry executives say.
Morgan Stanley estimates widespread adoption of electric vehicles
globally could eliminate 3 million auto-industry jobs.
The closed factories are the most visible sign of GM Chief
Executive Mary Barra's focus on redirecting capital to develop
electric and driverless cars, capital-intensive bets with an
uncertain payoff. GM plans 20 new electric models, mostly in China,
over the next few years, funded in part by the plant closures and
other moves aimed at boosting cash flow by $6 billion a year.
"We are willing to make tough and strategic decisions to not
only meet our commitments but to secure the company's future," Ms.
Barra told analysts earlier this year.
Nearly all GM's U.S. sales are gas-powered vehicles today and
that's not expected to change soon. But signs of the shift to
electrics are everywhere. For instance, the company's luxury
Cadillac brand recently changed the badge on the rear ends of its
vehicles to reflect a measurement of torque -- an appealing trait
of driving electric cars -- rather than horsepower or engine
size.
Union officials worry that GM and its two Detroit rivals -- Ford
Motor Co. and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV -- could over time
outsource much of the mechanical guts of an electric car to
nonunion suppliers. Today, most of the batteries installed in a
plug-in car are purchased from LG Corp., Panasonic Corp. and other
Asian-based suppliers.
At the bargaining table, the UAW's role in GM's electric-vehicle
plans has been a focal point. GM floated a proposal to build a new
electric-car battery factory in Ohio, near one of the assembly
plants it is closing, that it hopes will replenish some of the
factory jobs lost earlier this year, people close to the talks have
said.
But the plant would likely employ UAW workers numbering in the
hundreds, compared to the more than 3,000 union-represented
employees assembling compact cars at the factory in Lordstown,
Ohio, just a few years ago. The jobs would pay less too, people
close to the talks said: Around $15-17 per hour, to be competitive
with other, nonunion battery-cell facilities owned by Tesla Inc.
and LG, the people said, far less than the nearly $30-an-hour full
wage at GM's Lordstown factory.
GM's proposal for the battery plant already has some workers
frustrated.
Brian DiRenzo, 37 years old, one of the thousands of workers
affected when GM closed its Lordstown factory in March, says he has
no interest in working at a battery-cell plant because of the lower
pay and is holding out hope the Lordstown factory will be revived.
"Workers deserve a car in that plant, not some phony battery
plant," he said.
While it is still uncertain how fast the demand for electric
cars will grow -- or whether battery costs will come down enough to
make them affordable -- nearly all the major car companies are
moving to electrify their vehicle lineups.
Along with GM, Volkswagen AG, BMW AG and other major auto makers
are placing big bets on electrics, prodded by tougher emissions
standards in Europe and China. Ford, which is also restructuring
its business to slash costs, has said it is spending $11 billion on
electrified models through 2022.
Labor leaders in the U.S. and Europe are trying to preserve jobs
by pressing car companies and suppliers to build electric cars and
parts domestically.
In Germany this week, labor officials were beaming as Volkswagen
opened the doors of a new line to produce battery cells at its
engine factory in Salzgitter. A few years ago, VW committed to a
deal with the union to produce three electric-vehicle models in
Germany by converting factories that it would have otherwise shut
down.
When Porsche AG was deciding where to build its first
all-electric car, the Taycan sedan introduced this month, labor
leaders convinced workers to take a cut in their annual bonuses to
persuade management to build the car in Stuttgart.
The UAW is pressing for similar moves in the U.S.
"We want new investment in technology and products to help keep
us on the cutting edge, and training to make sure our workers are
competitive, " UAW President Gary Jones said at the union's
bargaining convention in the spring.
Beijing is requiring car companies to sell a minimum number of
electric vehicles. In the European Union, the heavy cost for auto
makers to comply with tightening emissions regulations over the
next decade represents "the largest risk to the EU auto industry in
recent memory," according to analysts at Evercore ISI.
Collectively, car companies are spending around $225 billion
globally to develop electric cars over the next several years,
consulting firm AlixPartners estimates. Still, electric vehicles
account for less than 2% of overall U.S. sales today, and even
bullish forecasts expect their market share will remain under 20%
in 2030.
The capital crunch is sparking industry consolidation. A
now-scuttled merger bid between Fiat Chrysler and Renault SA this
year was driven by the need for scale to compete in electric cars
and other budding technologies.
China is GM's biggest market by sales, adding to the urgency to
expand electric vehicles across its major markets to leverage its
scale.
Globally, 42% of GM's plants make engines or transmissions,
signaling that efforts to retool its manufacturing operations could
result in significant costs, as well as labor strife, Credit Suisse
analyst Dan Levy said in a report this week.
GM President Mark Reuss, an engineer and professional racecourse
test driver, sees an eventual end for gas engines. He says GM has
wrung nearly all the efficiency it can from them, and electrics are
the only way for it to hit tougher emissions regulations
globally.
"I don't know where to spend money anymore" on gas engines, Mr.
Reuss said in an interview.
Scott Harwick, an electrician at GM's assembly plant in Detroit,
which is targeted for closure, is hopeful the factory will get a
new life producing electric vehicles. GM negotiators have raised
the prospect in contract talks of building an electric pickup truck
at the plant, people close to the talks say.
"We'd love to have an electric pickup here," said Mr. Harwick,
49, during a break from the picket lines last week. "I don't care
what it is -- we just want something that sells."
William Boston contributed to this article.
Write to Mike Colias at Mike.Colias@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
September 27, 2019 10:11 ET (14:11 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
General Motors (NYSE:GM)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
General Motors (NYSE:GM)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024