UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
_______________________________
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
_______________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed by the Registrant ☒ |
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ |
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
☐ |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
☐ |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-16(e)(2)) |
☒ |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
☐ |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
☐ |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
CITIZENS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ No fee required.
☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary
materials.
☐ Fee computed on table in exhibit required
by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11.
2022
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
AND
PROXY STATEMENT
A MESSAGE FROM OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
April 25, 2022
Dear Shareholders,
On behalf of the entire Board of Directors, it is my privilege to
invite you to our 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on
Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. Central Time, at our
headquarters located at 11815 Alterra Parkway, Suite 1500, Austin,
Texas 78758. Holders of record of our Class A common stock as of
April 12, 2022 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the
Annual Meeting.
The last 12 months have been an exciting year for Citizens as we
transitioned from a controlled company for the first time in over
30 years. Thank you for your continued support and encouragement as
we have worked through the challenges that face corporations in
today's demanding business environment. I look forward to
continuing our partnerships to deliver on the promises to our
policyholders, our independent agents and consultants, our
employees and to you, our shareholders.
We hope the material contained in this accompanying Proxy Statement
demonstrates how seriously we take the trust you place in us
through your ownership of Citizens shares, and we ask that you vote
in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations as a
sign of your support for our continuing efforts.
Sincerely,
Gerald W. Shields
Chief Executive Officer and President
Citizens, Inc.
NOTICE OF 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHEN:
Tuesday, June 7, 2022
10:00 a.m., Central Time
|
WHERE:
Citizens, Inc. Headquarters
11815 Alterra Parkway, Suite 1500, Austin, Texas 78758
|
The Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form
10-K are available free of charge at
www.envisionreports.com/cia
|
ITEMS OF BUSINESS:
(1) To elect each of the nine director
nominees identified in the accompanying Proxy Statement to serve
until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until his or her
successor is duly elected and qualified;
(2) To ratify the appointment of Grant
Thornton LLP as the Company's independent registered public
accounting firm for 2022;
(3) To approve, on a non-binding advisory
basis, executive compensation (“Say-on-Pay”); and
(4) To transact such other business as may
properly come before the Annual Meeting, or at any postponement or
adjournment thereof.
RECORD DATE:
Close of business on April 12, 2022.
On or about April 25, 2022, proxy materials or a Notice of
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be sent to
shareholders who own our Class A common stock as of the Record Date
in connection with our solicitation of proxies for this year’s
Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Sheryl Kinlaw
Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
Austin, Texas
April 25, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
PROXY SUMMARY |
|
About Citizens |
|
2021 Highlights |
|
Items of Business at our 2022 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders |
|
How to Vote |
|
|
|
PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
OUR FOCUS ON ESG |
|
Our Commitment to Good Corporate Governance |
|
Governance Summary |
|
Our Culture of Responsibility and Ethics |
|
Social Matters Matter |
|
Focus on the Environment |
|
|
|
BOARD MATTERS |
|
Board’s Roles and Responsibilities |
|
Risk Oversight |
|
Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors |
|
Board Selection |
|
Board Refreshment |
|
Director Independence |
|
Director Nominees |
|
Board Leadership Structure |
|
Board Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors |
|
Succession Planning |
|
Board Processes |
|
Board and Committee Evaluation Process |
|
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions |
|
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation |
|
Communications with the Board |
|
Director Compensation |
|
|
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS |
|
Proposal No. 2 – Ratification of Appointment of our Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
Appointment and Oversight of Independent Auditor |
|
Audit
Committee Pre-Approval of Services
|
|
Audit Committee and Meetings |
|
Primary Responsibilities and 2021 Actions |
|
Audit Committee Report |
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
|
Proposal No. 3 – Advisory Vote on Executive
Compensation |
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
|
Report of the Compensation Committee |
|
Compensation Tables |
|
Shield's Consulting Agreement |
|
Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change-in-Control |
|
CEO Pay Ratio |
|
|
|
STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION |
|
Security Ownership of Directors and Management |
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners |
|
|
|
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING |
|
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
PROXY SUMMARY
This proxy summary highlights selected information that is provided
in more detail throughout this Proxy Statement, which is first
being sent or made available to shareholders of Citizens, Inc., a
Colorado corporation, on or about April 25, 2022. This summary
does not contain all of the information you should consider before
voting, so please read the full Proxy Statement carefully before
voting. For more information regarding our 2021 performance, please
read our 2021 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
ABOUT CITIZENS
Citizens, Inc. is an insurance holding company incorporated in
Colorado serving the life insurance needs of individuals in the
United States since 1969 and internationally since 1975. Through
our insurance subsidiaries, we now provide insurance benefits to
residents in 31 U.S. states and more than 75 different countries.
We pursue a strategy of offering traditional insurance products in
niche markets where we believe we are able to achieve competitive
advantages. At December 31, 2021, we had approximately
$1.9 billion of assets
and approximately
$4.2 billion of insurance in force.
2021 HIGHLIGHTS
IN 2021, WE BECAME A NON-CONTROLLED COMPANY
Throughout most of our history, the Company was led and controlled
by our founder Harold E. Riley and his family members. Mr. Riley
passed away in 2017 and in 2020, a change-in-control of our Company
occurred when the shares held by the Harold E. Riley Trust were
transferred to the Harold E. Riley Foundation (the “Foundation”).
As a result of this change-in-control:
•On
August 5, 2020, Geoffrey Kolander, our Chief Executive Officer and
President resigned and Gerald W. Shields, the Vice Chairman of the
Board of Directors of the Company, was appointed Interim Chief
Executive Officer; and
•In
February 2021, the Company entered into an agreement with the
Foundation to purchase all of the outstanding shares of Class B
common stock for a purchase price of $9.1 million (the “B Share
Transaction”).
In April 2021, the Company and the Foundation obtained all
regulatory approval required to consummate the the B Share
Transaction. In accordance with Colorado law, the shares of Class B
common stock are now classified as authorized, but unissued shares.
Our Board of Directors (the "Board") has resolved not to vote the
shares of Class B common stock as long as they are so classified.
Accordingly, since April 2021:
•the
Company has only one class of stock outstanding: the Class A common
stock, which is registered under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and listed on the New York Stock Exchange
(“NYSE”);
•the
Class B Shares do not have any voting rights;
•the
holders of the Class A shares are entitled to elect all of the
directors at the Company’s annual meetings; and
•for
the first time in over 30 years, we are no longer a “controlled”
company as defined under the NYSE rules.
2021 PRIORITIES
Because we became a non-controlled company for the first time in
over 30 years, the Board and management were able to reset and
clearly define our priorities in order to set a course for
long-term profitable growth. Our growth strategy consists of the
following four pillars:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Year Sales Increase |
|
Improve Policy Retention |
|
Roadmap Execution |
|
Financials & Expense Discipline |
|
|
Achieve first year sales growth across all markets. |
|
Improve first year policy retention (measured on 15-month
renewal). |
|
Maintain and execute on the approved 5 Quarter Roadmap. |
|
Maintain and execute on the approved budget and sales
plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our first-year premiums in 2021 increased by 11.2% compared to
2020. We believe this increase was driven by our focused marketing
campaigns, including a campaign intended to recruit new agents, the
introduction of new products, and higher sales in 2021 compared to
2020 due to COVID-19 impacts in 2020.
Our surrenders decreased by $3.2 million in 2021 from 2020, which
we believe was in large part due to our retention
efforts.
Accordingly, our retention improved in both our Life Insurance and
our Home Service Insurance segments.
We achieved above expectations on our 5-quarter roadmap -
importantly, we delivered 12 new or revised products tailored more
specifically to our customer’s needs, and also delivered the
infrastructure to more efficiently deliver and service those
products and our customers.
We achieved budgeted net income, partly as a result of gains due to
our diversified investment strategy and also partly as a result of
focus on controllable operating expenses. Operating Expenses are
our second largest expense and thus drive our operating results.
Our general operating expenses decreased by $10.3 million in 2021
as compared to 2020. General operating expenses in 2020 included
$10.0 million of severance payments to our former CEO related to
the change in control of the Company.
See "Financial Highlights" below and additionally, for specific
information on performance on each of the four pillars, see
"Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis –
2021 Executive Compensation Decisions in Detail – Calculating the
2021 Annual Bonus" on page
43.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (2021 compared to 2020)
At December 31, 2021, we had $1.9 billion in total assets, an
increase from $1.8 billion at December 31, 2020, and we had $27.3
million in cash and cash equivalents. We did not have any debt at
December 31, 2021.
During 2021, we reported net income of $36.8 million, compared to a
net loss of $11.0 million in 2020. In comparison to 2020, the $47.8
million increase in net income was primarily due to:
↑ $43.8 million tax benefit;
↑ $9.5 million increase in investment related gains;
and
↓ $10.3 million of general expenses.
The increase in net income was partially offset by:
↑ $4.2 million in death claim benefits;
↑ $6.5 million in future policy benefit reserves; and
↑ $12.6 million goodwill impairment.
GOVERNANCE UPDATES
As we have transitioned from a controlled company to a
non-controlled company over the past year, we have enhanced our
corporate governance practices. Since our 2021 annual meeting of
stockholders, we have:
•added
diversity
by electing two women to the Board in 2021 with deep insurance
expertise
◦Cynthia
H. Davis has been an insurance underwriter for over 30 years, with
extensive experience in the international markets
◦Mary
Taylor is the former insurance commissioner of the State of Ohio
and a Certified Public Accountant
•updated
our
Board refreshment policy
◦mandatory
retirement
at age 75 (directors as of June 1, 2022 grandfathered to age
80)
◦12-year
term limit
(policy effective June 2022)
•added
individual director self-assessments
to annual governance tasks to better assess board and individual
performance
•adopted
Stock Ownership Guidelines
for our directors, Chief Executive Officer and other Section 16
officers
•adopted
a
Director Resignation Policy
for uncontested elections
ITEMS OF BUSINESS AT OUR 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
The following table summarizes the proposals to be voted upon at
the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to
be held on June 7, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. Central Time at our
headquarters in Austin, Texas, and the Board’s voting
recommendation with respect to each proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL 1 |
VOTING
STANDARD
|
OUR BOARD’S RECOMMENDATION |
READ MORE STARTING ON PAGE… |
1. |
Election of Directors |
Majority of Votes Cast |
FOR each Nominee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
AGE |
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION and
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
|
DIRECTOR SINCE
|
INDEPENDENT
|
Gerald W. Shields |
64 |
Citizens’ Chief Executive Officer and President; Vice-Chairman of
the Board |
2017 |
No |
Christopher W. Claus |
61 |
Retired financial and investment executive USAA of San
Antonio |
2017 |
Yes |
Cynthia H. Davis |
56 |
Life Insurance underwriter at NFP Corp. / Partners
Financial |
2021 |
Yes |
Jerry D. Davis, Jr. |
71 |
Chairman of the Board; Retired life insurance company CEO and
Chairman |
2017 |
Yes |
Francis A. Keating II |
78 |
Chairman of the Board of Regents, University of Oklahoma; Former
Governor of Oklahoma; Former President and CEO, American Council of
Life Insurers; Former President and CEO, American Bankers
Association; Former Partner at Holland & Knight LLP |
2017 |
Yes |
Dr. Terry S. Maness |
72 |
Dean at Baylor University’s Hankamer School of Business; Former
Chairman of the Department of Finance, Insurance and Real Estate at
Baylor University |
2011 |
Yes |
J. Keith Morgan |
71 |
Retired senior legal executive; Former Chief Legal Officer at
TIAA-CREF Life Insurance Co. |
2021 |
Yes |
Dr. Robert B. Sloan, Jr. |
73
|
President and Chief Executive Officer at Houston Baptist
University
|
2007 |
Yes |
Mary Taylor |
56
|
Vice President, Operations and Finance at Northeast Ohio Medical
University; CPA; former Lieutenant Governor of Ohio and former
Director of the Ohio Department of Insurance
|
2021 |
Yes |
The current size of the Board is 10 members. Pursuant to our
Director refreshment policy, Dean Gage is retiring as of the date
of the Annual Meeting. The Board does not currently anticipate
filling the vacancy created by Dean Gage’s retirement but plans to
reduce the size of the Board to 9 members as of the date of the
Annual Meeting. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of
persons than the number of nominees named herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL 2 |
VOTING
STANDARD
|
OUR BOARD’S RECOMMENDATION |
READ MORE STARTING ON PAGE… |
2. |
Ratify the Appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm for 2022 |
Majority of Votes Cast |
FOR |
|
Grant Thornton LLP is an independent registered public accounting
firm with significant expertise and reasonable fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL 3 |
VOTING
STANDARD
|
OUR BOARD’S RECOMMENDATION |
READ MORE STARTING ON PAGE… |
3. |
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation |
Majority of Votes Cast |
FOR |
|
COMPENSATION BEST PRACTICES
Since the death of our founder, Harold E. Riley, in 2017, our
Compensation Committee has taken, and continues to take, critical
steps to enhance our executive compensation program and move
towards market best practices and
pay-for-performance.
The following table summarizes some highlights of our compensation
practices that drive our named executive officer compensation
program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHAT WE DO
|
WHAT WE DON'T DO
|
*Align
our executive pay with performance
*Set
quantifiable performance objectives that incentivize executives to
drive revenue and improve profitability
*Annual
restricted stock unit (“RSU”) grants to executive officers require
achievement of performance goals to receive, then vest over 3
year
*Change-in-control
severance limited to 2x salary and annual cash incentive pay for
CEO and 6 months’ salary and annual cash incentive pay for other
executive officers
*Stock
ownership guidelines
*Annual
say-on-pay advisory vote
*Performance-based
compensation clawback policy
*Engage
independent compensation consultant
*Benchmark
executive compensation against competitive market
practices
|
–While
the Company is party to an employment contract with the Chief
Executive Officer (2 year term with annual 1 year renewal), it does
not provide guaranteed salary increases nor non-performance bonus
arrangements
–No
“single trigger” change-in-control payout provisions
–No
hedging, short sales or pledging of shares by directors or
officers
–No
supplemental executive retirement plan
–Limited
perquisites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL 4 |
4. |
Transact such Other Business as May Properly Come Before the Annual
Meeting or at any Postponement of Adjournment thereof |
Should any other business come before the Annual Meeting, the
persons named in the proxy will vote on such business based on
their best judgment and discretion. At this time, management is not
aware of and does not expect any other matters to be raised at the
Annual Meeting.
|
HOW TO VOTE
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage
you to submit your proxy or voting instructions as soon as
possible. Shareholders of record may vote using any of the
following methods:
VOTE IN ADVANCE.
Votes submitted in advance must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time on June 6, 2022. You may vote in advance by any of the
following methods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ONLINE:
|
Go to http://www.envisionreports.com/cia or scan the QR code. Login
details are located on your proxy card. |
|
|
|
|
BY TELEPHONE:
Call toll-free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683)
within the USA, U.S. territories and Canada.
|
Please have your proxy card and the last four digits of your Social
Security Number or Tax Identification Number available. Follow the
simple instructions the recorded message provides you |
|
|
BY MAIL:
If you requested printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you
will receive a proxy card, and you may vote by marking, signing and
dating your proxy card and returning it in the postage-paid
envelope provided by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on June 6,
2022. The named proxies will vote your stock according to your
directions. If you submit a signed proxy card without indicating
your vote, the person voting the proxy will vote your stock in
favor of the proposals.
|
|
|
VOTE AT THE MEETING
|
|
|
|
IN PERSON:
You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you are a
beneficial owner of our shares (i.e, your stock is held in the name
of a bank, broker or other holder of record), admission is based on
proof of ownership, such as a recent brokerage statement and voting
in person requires you to obtain a proxy, executed in your favor,
by such bank, broker or other holder to be able to vote at the
Annual Meeting.
|
If your shares are held in a bank or brokerage
account,
your bank or broker will provide you with materials and
instructions for voting your shares. Please check with your bank or
broker and follow the voting procedures they provide to vote your
shares.
If you have any questions or require assistance with voting your
shares, you may also contact Alliance Advisors, LLC at 200
Broadacres Drive, Bloomfield, New Jersey 07003. Shareholders may
call toll free:
1-800-574-5928.
PROXY STATEMENT
The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Citizens, Inc. (the
“Company”) is furnishing you this Proxy Statement to solicit
proxies on its behalf for the items to be voted at the 2022 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders (“Annual Meeting”).
Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2022
Time: 10:00 a.m. Central Time
Place: The Company’s principal executive
office at
11815 Alterra Parkway, Suite 1500
Austin, Texas 78758
The proxies also may be voted at any adjournments or postponements
of the Annual Meeting.
The Board is first furnishing the proxy materials to holders of the
Company’s Class A common stock on or about April 25,
2022.
All properly executed written proxies and all properly completed
proxies submitted by Internet, telephone or mail that are delivered
pursuant to this solicitation will be voted at the Annual Meeting
in accordance with the directions given in the proxy unless the
proxy is revoked prior to completion of voting at the Annual
Meeting. Voting by proxy will not limit your right to vote at the
Annual Meeting if you later decide to attend in person. Other than
the approval of the items of business listed above, we do not
anticipate that any other matters will be raised at the Annual
Meeting.
Only owners of record of shares of Class A common stock as of the
close of business on April 12, 2022, the Record Date, are
entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or at any
adjournments or postponements thereof. Each shareholder of record
on the Record Date is entitled to one vote for each share of Class
A common stock held by such shareholder on all matters coming
before the Annual Meeting. As of close of business on the Record
Date, there were 50,428,935 shares of Class A common stock issued
and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual
Meeting.
We intend to hold our Annual Meeting in person. However, we are
actively monitoring the coronavirus (COVID-19) situation. We are
sensitive to the public health and travel concerns that our
shareholders may have and the protocols that federal, state and
local governments may impose. In the event it is not possible or
advisable to hold the Annual Meeting in person, we will announce
alternative meeting arrangements, which may include changing the
location of the meeting or holding a virtual meeting solely by
means of remote communication online, as promptly as practicable.
You are encouraged to monitor our investor relations website
at
https://www.citizensinc.com/investors-investor-information
for any updated information about the Annual Meeting.
OUR FOCUS ON ESG
We believe that creating long-term value for our shareholders
implicitly requires enacting and executing sustainable business
practices and strategies that, while delivering competitive returns
and executing on our strategic initiatives, also take into account
Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) issues. Our Board plays a
pivotal role in ESG, with oversight of all elements of the
programs.
We focus on the following areas of ESG:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOVERNANCE
|
SOCIAL
|
ENVIRONMENT
|
|
|
|
Shareholder Voting Rights |
Pay Equity |
Environmental Stewardship |
Executive Compensation |
Employee Engagement |
Responsible Investing |
Risk Oversight |
Diversity & Inclusion |
|
Board Composition and Independence |
Talent Attraction & Retention (learning and
training) |
|
|
Employee Wellness |
|
OUR COMMITMENT TO GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Good corporate governance is a key element of our ESG focus. While
the Board is responsible for providing oversight over governance,
social and environmental issues, its key priority is ensuring that
it functions well and that our management team (to whom the Board
has delegated the authority to manage the day-to-day operations of
the Company) functions well, and that the Board understands and
provides guidance with respect to key risks that might affect our
Company and shareholders. Below is a Governance Summary which
highlights our governance practices.
GOVERNANCE SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highly Independent and Diverse Board
|
■Our
CEO is the only non-independent director
■We
elected
two women
to the Board in 2021
■All
Board
committees
are composed
entirely
of
independent directors
■We
have adopted
a heightened standard of director independence
- an independent director may only receive up to $25,000 in
consulting fees or other income from the Company outside of Board
compensation
■Independent
directors hold executive sessions at least three times per year
without management present
■Directors
bring a wide array of qualifications, skills and attributes to our
Board;
see
Director Nominees beginning on page
16
|
Independent Board Chair
|
■Independent
Board Chair structure provides effective checks and balances to
ensure the
exercise of independent judgment
by the Board
|
Board Refreshment
|
■3
of our 9
director nominees were first elected in
2021
■7
of our 9
director nominees have been elected in the
past 5 years
■Mandatory
retirement
age at 75 (any director as of June 1, 2022 grandfathered to age
80)
■12-year
term limit
(policy effective June 2022)
|
Director Accountability
|
■Over
75% average director attendance rate at Board and committee
meetings in 2021
■Comprehensive
orientation
for three new directors in 2021
■Annual
Board and committee self-evaluations and starting in 2022,
individual director assessments
■Director
Resignation Policy
|
Shareholder Voting Rights
|
■Holders
of our Class A common stock elect
all
directors
annually
(no staggered board; no dual classes of outstanding voting
stock)
|
Executive Compensation Practices
|
■We
have an
annual “say on pay”
advisory vote. In 2021,
76%
of our shareholders voted in favor of "say on pay"
■Stock
Ownership Guidelines
|
No Hedging or Pledging Company Stock
|
■Our
directors and officers are
prohibited
from entering into
hedging
transactions or
pledging
the Company’s securities
|
ERM and ESG
|
■Our
Board and Audit Committee oversee our Enterprise Risk Management
(ERM) program and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
matters
|
NYSE Listing Standards
|
■As
of the date of this Proxy Statement, we are in compliance with all
applicable NYSE listing standards
|
Key Corporate Governance Documents
|
|
|
•Corporate
Governance Guidelines
|
•Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics
◦Includes
our Insider Trading Policy
|
•Committee
Charters
•Stock
Ownership Guidelines
•Director
Resignation Policy
|
The documents listed above are available in the Investors –
Corporate Governance section of our website at
https://www.citizensinc.com/english-investors-corporate-governance.
Printed copies of all of these documents are also available free of
charge upon written request to our Secretary, at Citizens, Inc.
Attn: Secretary, P. O. Box 149151, Austin, Texas
78714-9151.
The Key Corporate Governance Documents, together with our Articles
of Incorporation and our Bylaws, form the governance framework for
the Board and its committees. We believe good governance
strengthens the Board and management’s accountability. The Board
regularly (and at least annually) reviews its Corporate Governance
Guidelines and other corporate governance documents and from time
to time revises them when it believes it serves the interests of
the Company and its shareholders to do so and in response to
feedback from shareholders, changing regulatory and governance
requirements and best practices.
OUR CULTURE OF RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS
As part of our commitment to ESG, we maintain an active ethics
program. Our ethics program is rooted in our seven core
values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEGRITY |
We will build trust through fair, honest and ethical relationships
by adhering to a strong moral compass. |
PERSEVERANCE |
We will steadfastly pursue our mission despite obstacles,
difficulties or delays in achieving success. |
EXCELLENCE |
We deliberately pursue high standards and are committed to
achieving higher standards. |
SELFLESS SERVICE |
We promote the assistance of others, not for personal gain, but for
the enhancement of others. |
LEADERSHIP |
We identify and take ownership of our areas of influence; guiding,
developing and mentoring others along the way. |
ACCOUNTABILITY |
We are responsible for our actions and we accept the outcome of
those actions. |
COMMITMENT |
With dedication we pursue this mission, vision and core values to
bring success to our employees, policyholders, shareholders, agents
and associates. |
Our Board, officers and employees are obligated to adhere to our
core values. In that way, we can ensure that we continue to be good
stewards of the investments in us by our shareholders, employees,
policyholders and independent consultants.
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“Code of Ethics”) forms
the core of our ethics program and provides general statements of
our expectations regarding ethical standards we expect our
directors, officers and employees to adhere to while acting on our
behalf. The Code of Ethics protects our shareholders by prohibiting
conflicts of interest and usurping of corporate opportunities, as
well as by protecting the Company’s information and assets and
requiring fair dealing. If the Board grants any waivers from our
Code of Ethics to any of our directors or executive officers, or if
we amend our Code of Ethics, we will, as required, disclose these
matters on a timely basis.
Additionally, our ethics program includes monitoring of the
corruption risks that are most applicable to our industry and
company, including anti-money laundering (“AML”) and anti-bribery.
To that extent, our Board has direct oversight of the AML program,
which is managed by the Vice President of Compliance. Our AML
policy requires that all employees and independent agents who sell
our products participate in annual AML training. Our AML program
has is audited by an external, independent third-party and, in
2021, no deficiencies were found.
SOCIAL MATTERS MATTER
Our Company revolves around people. We insure people’s lives. We
believe in always doing the right thing for our customers, our
employees and agents, our shareholders and our
community.
Empowering and Engaging Our People
The Company’s focus continues to be fostering a culture that
provides equal opportunity for all, and is inclusive and attractive
for all of our employees and independent sales agents. Below are
some of the key initiatives that we have undertaken to foster such
an environment.
Pay Equity.
We are committed to provide a fair or living wage for all
employees. In 2021, the Company’s outside counsel performed a pay
equity audit and concluded that neither gender nor race drive or
predict compensation.
Culture of Engagement.
We have town hall meetings at least quarterly where all employees
are invited to listen to updates from management on results and key
initiatives, as well as ask questions. Confidential surveys are
provided to employees after each town hall to give our employees
the opportunity to provide feedback and suggest additional topics.
Additionally, our compliance officer meets regularly with employees
to determine whether they have any concerns with compliance, ethics
or fraud, or any other general concerns regarding the Company.
Through these surveys and one-on-one meetings, we are able to
identify opportunities for improvement, and to create action plans
based on feedback as appropriate.
Culture of Diversity and Inclusion.
The Company continues to prioritize our efforts in creating and
sustaining a culture of diversity and inclusion. The Company
derives a great deal of strength from our diverse workforce.
Additionally, in 2021, our Board elected two new women and a woman
was appointed as our Chief Legal Officer.
The pie charts below illustrate the gender, racial and ethnic
make-up of our total employee workforce as of December 31,
2021:
Culture of Wellness.
We are committed to helping our employees have the opportunity to
live healthy and active lives. To help ensure the health of our
employees, we provide them with a comprehensive benefits package
that includes health insurance, dental and vision insurance,
fitness center access and wellness programs. We offer a discount on
employee contributions towards health costs for employees who
complete an annual wellness exam. Additionally, in response to the
ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we have decided to offer a permanent
hybrid working environment, where certain employees can work
part-time in the office and part-time at home. We follow government
mandates and suggestions, including vaccine and mask requirements,
in order to ensure the safety of our employees.
Culture of Learning and Training.
At the Company, we believe in continuous learning. We offer
industry specific training (such as anti-money laundering training,
which is required for all employees, and we pay for LOMA education
courses), as well as routine training on information
security.
FOCUS ON THE ENVIRONMENT
Environmental Stewardship.
We are committed to operating in an environmentally responsible
manner and strive to be a good steward of the environment. We are
headquartered in Austin, Texas, one of the United States’
“greenest” cities. In 2020 we moved into a new leased headquarter
building, which was designed to be highly energy efficient and has
achieved LEED Gold Certification. The building is outfitted with
LED lighting and motion detecting light sensors that help reduce
unnecessary energy consumption. As a participant in the Austin
Energy Green Building Program, the building was designed and built
in a manner that reduced the impact of construction on the
environment and utilized materials sourced locally. In addition,
the landscaping was designed with native grasses and plants to
minimize the use of irrigation and the office has refillable water
stations to save use of plastic.

Reducing the amount of paper we use is another key focus for us. In
2021, our Home Service Insurance segment revitalized its product
offerings and moved from 100% paper applications to use of an
online portal application for its new products. In our Life
Insurance segment, over 95% of our applications were electronic in
2021. Additionally, we continually monitor our office operations
for opportunities to reduce or eliminate the use of paper,
including by using electronic signature and distribution software
for our policyholders, agents and standard documents. Updated
payment processing systems eliminate the need for our policyholders
to mail their checks to us, which helps not only reduce paper
usage, but also air and road transportation use that might
negatively impact our environment.
These efforts help us reduce our carbon footprint in an effort to
be good stewards of the environment.
Responsible Investing.
In addition to financial considerations and prudent
diversification, we evaluate ESG criteria when making investment
decisions for our investment portfolio. We believe that good
governance practices and a commitment to corporate responsibility
can enhance investment opportunities and meaningfully affect
investment performance. We also believe long-term sustainability
concerns impact both investors and society and thus should be
considered when making investment decisions. We made our first
investment in a private equity fund focused on global renewal power
generation (wind and solar energy) in 2020 and will continue to
seek other responsible investing opportunities in the
future.
BOARD MATTERS
THE BOARD IS PRIMARILY RESPONSIBLE FOR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
Overseeing Citizens’ strategic initiatives, overall performance and
direction |
|
|
● |
Overseeing risk, cybersecurity and internal controls |
|
|
● |
Overseeing investment of the Company’s assets |
|
|
● |
Monitoring executive performance, compensation and succession
planning |
|
|
● |
Establishing broad corporate policies, including in relation to
organizational development, governance, and corporate social
responsibility |
|
THE BOARD’S ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
RISK OVERSIGHT
Effective risk oversight is an important priority for the Board.
Our enterprise risk management (ERM) function identifies and
manages the Company’s key risks. The process starts with our
executive management team, who identifies key strategic, financial
and operational risks to the Company (collectively, the “Enterprise
Risks”) and manages the Enterprise Risks on a day-to-day basis. On
a quarterly basis, the management team reviews and discusses the
Enterprise Risks with the Audit Committee, whose charter gives it
oversight of the guidelines and policies that govern the ERM
process. Although risk oversight is conducted primarily through the
Audit Committee, in certain areas described below, other committees
of the Board have responsibility (e.g., the Compensation Committee
for compensation risk) and the full Board has responsibility for
general oversight of the ERM process and Enterprise Risks. The
Board satisfies this responsibility through full reports by each
committee chair regarding the committees’ considerations and
actions, as well as through regular reports directly from executive
officers responsible for oversight of particular Enterprise Risks
within the Company.
Selected Area of ERM Oversight in 2021
Key Enterprise Risks discussed among executive management, the
Audit Committee and the Board during 2021 included the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
Mortality risks (both COVID and non-COVID deaths) |
|
|
● |
The impact of surrenders on the Company’s operations and the
Company's initiatives to retain policies |
|
|
● |
The low interest-rate environment and its impact on the Company’s
investments |
|
|
● |
Risks to the Company’s strategic goals, including risks related to
first year sales both internationally and domestically |
|
|
● |
Catastrophic events that impacted the Company, especially as
related to climate change, such as Hurricane Ida in
2021 |
|
|
● |
Regulatory risk related primarily to the Company’s international
operations |
|
|
● |
Operational risks related to the transformation of the Home
Services Insurance business |
|
|
● |
Financial risks related to the statutory capital ratios of the
insurance subsidiaries |
|
|
● |
Information and data security risks |
|
|
● |
Anti-money laundering risks |
|
Discussions of these topics can be found in the Company’s Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 11, 2022.
While the Audit Committee has primary responsibility for overseeing
the Company’s ERM function, the other committees of the Board
consider risks within their areas of responsibility and apprise the
Board of significant risks and management’s response to those
risks. For example, the Compensation Committee considers the risks
that may be presented by our executive compensation philosophy and
programs, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
oversees the Company’s governance practices, director succession,
committee composition and leadership to manage risks associated
with corporate governance. The Investment Committee oversees risks
related to the Company’s assets and investment
portfolio.
Oversight of Information Security Risk and
Cybersecurity
Because we gather and maintain confidential and personal data on
our information systems for the purpose of conducting our insurance
subsidiaries’ operations, the Board considers Information Security
and cybersecurity to be key Enterprise Risks. The Audit Committee
and the Board evaluate the adequacy and appropriateness of the
Company’s Information Security program and controls. The Board and
Audit Committee both receive regular reports from and engage with
the Information Security officer and other management personnel on
key risk areas and related mitigation and control efforts related
to Information Security and cybersecurity.
The Company’s Information Security officer provides executive
direction with respect to implementation of the Company’s
Information Security program throughout the organization. This
officer reviews risks associated with the confidentiality,
integrity, and availability of critical business systems and
sensitive customer and Company data. In conjunction with our Vice
Presidents of IT and of Compliance, the Information Security
officer conducts risk assessments that measure the likelihood and
probable impact of information security events that could adversely
affect the Company’s operations, finances and reputation. Quarterly
updates are provided to the Audit Committee and updates are
provided to the Board at each of its regular meetings on changes to
cybersecurity and privacy regulations, top threats facing the
Company and key risks and mitigation efforts. The Chair of the
Audit Committee also provides quarterly reports to the full Board
on any material information security topics presented to the Audit
Committee.
While the Board and management personnel set the tone for the
Company’s Information Security program, the Company has a robust
information security training and compliance program. All employees
receive annual training on Information Security, and our IT
department has implemented a security risk awareness program to
help the Company’s employees learn how to maintain sound security
practices.
|
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 1:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
|
What Am I Voting On? |
|
Holders of Class A common stock are being asked to elect nine
directors to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders,
or until their respective successors are duly elected and
qualified.
|
|
Voting Recommendation: FOR |
|
The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
believe the skills, qualities, attributes, and experience of our
directors provide the Company with business acumen and a diverse
range of perspectives to engage each other and management to
effectively address the Company’s evolving needs and represent the
best interests of the Company’s shareholders. |
|
Voting Standard: |
|
Director nominees receiving the highest number of votes cast by
Class A shareholders in their favor will be elected to the Board.
Cumulative voting in the election of directors is not permitted and
proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the
number of nominees named herein. Under our Director Resignation
Policy, if a director receives more “withhold” votes than “for”
votes, such director will be required to submit his or her
resignation for Board consideration. |
|
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be disregarded and have no
impact on the vote, other than for establishing a
quorum. |
|
Each of the director nominees has consented to serving as a
nominee, being named in this Proxy Statement, and serving on the
Board if elected. If for any reason any nominee herein named is not
a candidate when the election takes place (which is not expected),
the proxy will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee at
the discretion of the persons named in the proxy.
BOARD SELECTION
Responsibility for Selection of Director Candidates
The Board is responsible for selecting director candidates to stand
for election by shareholders. The Board has delegated the screening
process for potential directors to the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee, which identifies, interviews and recruits
candidates for the Board. Upon identifying suitable potential Board
members, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee then
recommends individuals qualified to become Board members to the
Board for its consideration.
Qualification Standards for Directors
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers
director nominees who are recommended by its members, by other
Board members, by management or by shareholders, as well as those
identified by third parties known to the members or management. In
evaluating potential nominees to the Board, the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee has adopted standards related to the
qualifications of directors of the Company (the “Director
Standards”). The Director Standards include, without limitation,
independence, character and core values, ability to exercise sound
judgment, diversity, demonstrated leadership, and relevant skills
and experience in the areas of corporate needs of the Company such
as insurance regulation, insurance distribution, finance and
accounting, and public company experience.
The Board discusses and promotes efforts to enhance diversity in
its Board composition. The Board is committed to diversity and in
2021, added two female directors, both with extensive insurance
industry experience. The Board views diversity in the context of
the following factors: age, race, gender and ethnicity, geographic
knowledge, industry experience, board tenure and
culture.
Nominations by Shareholders
Our Board has a policy to consider properly submitted shareholder
recommendations for candidates for a director position, which
candidates must satisfy the Committee Standards. A shareholder
wishing to propose a candidate for the Board’s consideration should
follow the procedures in our Bylaws pertaining to shareholder
nominations and proposals.
BOARD REFRESHMENT
|
|
|
•3
new directors in 2021
|
•7
new directors since 2017
|
|
|
|
The Company is focused on active board refreshment and continually
evaluates the composition of the Board to ensure that it has the
right balance of skills, experience, perspective, and rigorous
oversight through independent judgment.
In order to encourage refreshment, facilitate an orderly transition
of legacy board members, increase diversity and expertise /
experience in areas of need, the Board has adopted a Board
Refreshment and Replacement Plan. Pursuant to the
plan:
•Dean
Gage, who has served on the Board since 2000, is retiring at the
2022 Annual Meeting; and
•Another
“legacy” board member (elected prior to 2017) will retire at the
2023 Annual Meeting.
|

The Board does not currently anticipate filling the vacancy created
by Dean Gage’s retirement but instead plans to reduce the size of
the Board to 9 members as of the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee continues to
search for members that bring additional diversity to our Board,
including racial or ethnic diversity.
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
|
|
It is the policy of the Company that the Board consist of a
majority of independent directors. The Board determines whether a
director or nominee is “independent” in accordance with the NYSE
Listed Company Manual, which requires an affirmative determination
that each independent director has no material relationship with
the Company or its affiliates or any executive officer of the
Company or his or her affiliates that in the judgment of the Board
would impair their effectiveness or independent judgment as a
director.
In addition to the standards contained in the NYSE Listed Company
Manual, the Board has determined that in order to be deemed
independent, a director may not receive more than $25,000 in
consulting fees or other income from the Company, other than
director fees (the “Enhanced Independence Standards”).
|
The Board has determined that all current Board members and
nominees, other than Mr. Shields, our Chief Executive Officer, are
independent as set forth under the NYSE Listed Company Manual
independence requirements and under our Enhanced Independence
Standards.
DIRECTOR NOMINEES
The Company’s Board consists of a diverse group of leaders in their
respective fields and almost all have extensive experience in the
life insurance industry. In these positions, they have gained broad
management and industry experience, including strategic planning,
business development, compliance, risk management, and leadership
development. In addition, some of our directors have experience
serving as executive officers, or on boards of directors, of other
public or private companies where they have gained experience in
governance and compensation matters. Two of our directors are
former elected officials who had oversight for insurance
responsibilities in their elected roles, and thus bring unique
perspectives to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald W. Shields, 64
|
Citizens’ Chief Executive Officer and President since January 1,
2022; served as Interim Chief Executive Officer and President from
August 2020 through December 31, 2021 |
|
Director since 2017; Vice-Chairman of the Board since February
2020 |
|
Other Current Public Boards: 0 |
|
Certifications: FLMI |
|
Education: B.A. - Accounting and Computer Science, Baylor
University |
Mr. Shields, our Chief Executive Officer and President, is a
seasoned life insurance executive who brings life insurance and
information technology experience to our Board. He has more than 30
years’ experience in health insurance management, as well as
professional certifications from Harvard University’s Kennedy
School of Government, Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Chief
Network Officers Program, and Aubrey Daniels International. He has
been named twice in CIO Magazine’s Top 100 CIOs of the Year and has
also been the recipient of ComputerWorld’s Top 100 CIO
Award.
Prior to Citizens, Mr. Shields served as Chief Information Officer
at FirstCare Health Plans from July 2015 to October 2018, and as
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer at American
Family Life Assurance Company of New York from 2002 to
2011.
Mr. Shields’ significant technology and insurance experience are
instrumental to the Board’s oversight as the Company advances its
strategic technology objectives. Mr. Shields recently completed the
Cyber Security Oversight Certificate from Carnegie Mellon
Institute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher W. Claus, 61
Independent Director
|
|
Retired executive of USAA of San Antonio |
|
Director since 2017 |
|
Committees: Investment Committee (Chair), Compensation Committee,
Executive Committee |
|
Other Current Public Boards: 1 (TrueCar, Inc.) |
|
Education: B.A. - Business, University of Minnesota -
Duluth
M.B.A. – University of St. Thomas
|
Mr. Claus
had a 20-year career as an executive at USAA of San Antonio, Texas
serving in various roles, including Executive Vice President of
USAA’s Enterprise Advice Group from 2013 to 2014, President of
USAA’s Financial Advice and Solutions Group from 2007 to 2013, and
President of USAA’s Investment Management Company from 2001 to
2006.
Mr. Claus is an experienced executive with insurance and asset
management expertise critical to the success of our Board. In his
role as Chairman of our Investment Committee, Mr. Claus has
strengthened the Board’s oversight of the Company’s assets under
management. Further, having served as President of USAA’s
Investment Management Company, Mr. Claus strengthens the Board’s
oversight function of our executive team’s strategic
initiatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cynthia H. Davis, 56
Independent Director
|
|
Life Insurance Underwriter at NFP Corp. / Partners
Financial |
|
Director since 2021 |
|
Committees: Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee |
|
Other Current Public Boards: 0 |
|
Certifications: FLMI, FALU, LOMA certified Associate - Customer
Service |
|
Education: B.A. – Economics, University of Georgia
|
Ms. Davis is a seasoned executive in the life insurance industry
with over 30 years of underwriting in both the carrier and
brokerage side. She is currently the Vice President and Senior
Underwriting Consultant at NFP/Partners Financial providing
underwriting expertise specializing in complex high net worth
cases, foreign nationals and offshore insurance. Previously, Ms.
Davis was the Chief Underwriter at Financial Industries Corporation
(FIC) and Great American. Ms. Davis is also involved with the Texas
Wide Underwriting planning board.
Ms. Davis’ brings to the Board deep knowledge of the insurance
industry, which she developed during her long and successful career
in the life insurance industry. With significant global experience
with both reinsurers and high net worth foreign insureds, she adds
valuable and unique expertise to our Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jerry D. “Chip” Davis, 71
Independent Director
|
|
Retired life insurance company CEO - National Farm Life Insurance
Company |
|
Director since 2017; Chairman of the Board since February
2020 |
|
Committees: Compensation Committee, Executive Committee, Investment
Committee |
|
Other Current Public Boards: 0 |
|
Certifications: FLMI |
|
Education: B.S. – Business, Tarleton State
Masters – Business Administration – Tarleton State
University
|
Mr. Davis is a seasoned and proven life insurance executive, having
had a 43-year insurance career with National Farm Life Insurance
Company (“NFLIC”). Mr. Davis began his career with NFLIC as a
Mortgage Loan officer in 1977 and become Senior Vice President and
Chief Investment Officer in 1981. He served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of NFLIC from 2004 to January 2016. Mr. Davis has
served on the board of NFLIC since 2004 and currently serves as
chairman.
Mr. Davis’ career as a life insurance executive and service as
Chief Investment Officer of a life insurance company brings
tremendous experience to our Board and Investment Committee.
Specifically, he has experience dealing with state insurance
regulators and auditors. His service as as Chief Investment Officer
of NFLIC strengthens the investment Committee’s oversight of the
Company’s assets under management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francis A. “Frank” Keating, II, 78
Independent Director
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Regents of the University of
Oklahoma |
|
Director since 2017 |
|
Committees: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
(Chair) |
|
Other Current Public Boards: 1 (BancFirst Corporation) |
|
Education: B.A. – History, Georgetown University
J.D. – University of Oklahoma College of Law
|
|
Governor Keating is the former Governor of the State of Oklahoma, a
position in which he served from 1995 to 2003. More recently, he
was as a partner at the law firm of Holland & Knight from
February 2016 to December 2018. He served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of the American Bankers Association from 2011 to
2016, and President and Chief Executive Officer of the American
Council of Life Insurers, the trade association for the life
insurance and retirement security industry, from 2003 to
2011.
Mr. Keating has held significant leadership positions in both the
public and private sectors, which make him a valuable addition to
our Board. In addition to serving as the Governor of Oklahoma, his
impressive career included serving as assistant secretary of the
Treasury and associate attorney general under President Ronald
Reagan. He was later general counsel and acting deputy secretary
for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) under
President George H.W. Bush. During his tenure at the Treasury
Department and HUD, he worked on significant issues affecting
insurance, banking, and the financial services industries. In
addition to his current public board, Gov. Keating formerly served
on the board of Stewart Title Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Stewart Information Services Corp., a publicly held title insurance
and real estate services company, from 2006 to January 2017, where
he chaired the Nominations and Corporate Governance
Committee.
Mr. Keating’s impressive legal and public service career further
strengthens our Board’s governance and oversight function. Further,
his background as Chief Executive Officer of the American Council
of Life Insurers, the preeminent advocacy group for life insurance
companies, brings life insurance industry experience and
connections to our Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Terry S. Maness, 73
Independent Director
|
|
Dean at Baylor University’s Hankamer School of Business |
|
Director since 2011 |
|
Committees: Audit Committee (Chair) |
|
Other Current Public Boards: 0 |
|
Certifications: Certified Cash Manager |
|
Education: B.A. and M.S. – Economics, Baylor
University
M.B.A. and Doctor of Business Administration – Indiana
University
|
Dr. Maness has served as Dean at Baylor University's Hankamer
School of Business since 1997 and will be named Dean Emeritus upon
his retirement effective August 1, 2022. Previously, Dr. Maness
served as Acting Dean at Baylor University from 1996 to 1997,
Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs at Baylor University from
1978 to 1981 and Chairman of the Department of Finance, Insurance
and Real Estate at Baylor University from 1985 to 1996. Dr. Maness
is an owner of Business Value Consultants and has owned such
company since 1989.
Dr. Maness’ background as Dean of one of America’s leading business
schools brings a strong academic presence to our board. He has
operated effectively at the highest levels in the academic and
business community. He is the author of five books about financial
analysis and financial management, and also a contributing author
to various publications, such as
Journal of Finance,
Journal of Banking and Finance,
Journal of Financial Education,
Journal of Portfolio Management,
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,
Journal of Futures Markets,
Journal of Cash Management
and
Corporate Controller.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Keith Morgan, 71
Independent Director
|
|
Retired senior legal executive; Former Chief Legal Officer at
TIAA-CREF |
|
Director since 2021 |
|
Committees: Investment Committee |
|
Other Current Public Boards: 0 |
|
Education: B.A. – Economics, Duke University
J.D., University of Virginia Law School
|
|
Military Veteran |
Mr. Morgan has decades of experience as a senior legal executive,
most recently (2015 - 2018) as Chief Legal Officer & Senior
Executive VP at TIAA-CREF, a $1 trillion retirement, insurance and
asset management company. Mr. Morgan specializes in securities law,
financial regulation, international transactions and mergers and
acquisitions. Prior to TIAA-CREF, he spent nearly 20 years at GE,
serving as general counsel and senior vice president of GE
Commercial Finance Ltd. and GE Capital Corporation. Before joining
GE, Mr. Morgan served as the managing partner of Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher's London, Paris, and Saudi Arabia offices. Earlier in his
career, he served in the U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General's
Corps.
Mr. Morgan’s experience as the Chief Legal Officer of major
insurance and asset management companies has provided him with a
substantive understanding of the risks, including investment risks,
related to a highly regulated company such as
Citizens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Robert B. Sloan, 73
Independent Director
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer at Houston Baptist
University |
|
Director since 2007 |
|
Committees: Compensation Committee (Chair), Audit Committee,
Executive Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee |
|
Other Current Public Boards: 0 |
|
Education: B. A – Psychology and Religion, Baylor
University
Master of Divinity – Princeton Theological
Seminary
Doctor of Theology – University of Basel,
Switzerland
|
Dr. Sloan has served as President and Chief Executive Officer at
Houston Baptist University since 2006. Previously, Dr. Sloan served
as Chancellor at Baylor University from 2005 to 2006 and President
and Chief Executive Officer at Baylor University from 1995 to 2005.
While at Baylor, Dr. Sloan was selected by the Big 12 Athletic
Conference board of directors to be Chairman of their Board of
Directors, and also convened and was asked to serve as chair of the
“Group of Six”, a gathering of presidents of the big six athletic
conferences. Dr. Sloan was also involved in an ex officio capacity
on investment committees both at the foundation level and at the
trustee level for the universities that he served.
Dr. Sloan has served as Chief Executive Officer of two major
academic institutions and has valuable insight into organizational
structure, executive decision-making, financial operations and
leadership. His executive management skills and extensive
experience with organization strategy and governance provide
invaluable insight and guidance to our Board’s oversight
function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Taylor, 56
Independent Director
|
|
Vice President, Operations and Finance at Northeast Ohio Medical
University |
|
Director since 2021 |
|
Committees: Audit Committee |
|
Other Current Public Boards: 0 |
|
Certifications: CPA |
|
Education: B.S. – Accounting, University of Akron
Master of Taxation, University of Akron
|
Ms. Taylor is a Certified Public Accountant and recognized tax and
auditing expert with over 30 years of experience in the public and
private sector. Since February 2020, she has served as the Vice
President, Operations and Finance at Northeast Ohio Medical
University. During 2019, she served as Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Welty Building Company and from August
2019 through March 2020 also served as the Chair of the Finance and
Operations Advisory Committee.
She has served in the following elected positions:
•2011
to 2019 - Lieutenant Governor of Ohio
◦Served
as the Director of the Ohio Department of Insurance from 2011 to
2017
•
2007 to 2011 - Auditor of State of Ohio
•2003
to 2006 - State Representative in Ohio
◦Served
on the Finance, Ways and Means, and Education
Committees
Ms. Taylor has extensive experience in transforming operations,
implementing automation in insurance and delivering results in
complex tax cases with the IRS and the Department of Labor. Her
unique mix of experience gives her a valuable perspective and
ability to oversee management’s efforts to grow and develop
Citizens’ business and its interactions with regulators as well as
the ability to enhance shareholder value by leveraging her
financial and risk management expertise and deep understanding of
the insurance business.
BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE
|
|
|
•Separate
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
The Board believes that the best and most effective leadership
structure for Citizens and its shareholders at this time is to have
separate chief executive officer and chairman roles. This structure
allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus his time and energy on
operating and managing the Company while enhancing the Board’s
ability to exercise independent oversight of Citizens’ management
on behalf of its shareholders.
Jerry D. “Chip” Davis, Jr. has served as the Company’s Chairman
since February 2020. The Board elected Mr. Davis to serve as
Chairman due to his 40+ years’ experience in the life insurance
industry, including as a leader of a life insurance company. Mr.
Davis as an Independent Director.
BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
The Company’s business affairs are conducted under the direction of
the Board. The Board met 8 times during 2021, and each director
attended or participated in 75% or more of the aggregate of (i) the
total number of meetings of the Board held during 2021, and (ii)
the total number of meetings held by each committee of the Board on
which such director served during 2021. We expect all of our
directors to attend our annual meeting of shareholders and all
directors serving at the time attended the 2021 annual
meeting.
Select officers and employees regularly attend Board meetings to
present information on our business and strategy, and Board members
have access to our officers and employees outside of Board
meetings. Board members are encouraged to make site visits to meet
with our employees, and to accept invitations to attend and speak
at internal Company meetings.
To promote open discussion, our independent directors hold
regularly scheduled executive sessions without management present.
These sessions allow the independent directors to review key
decisions and discuss matters in a manner independent of
management.
To assist it in carrying out its duties, the Board has delegated
certain authority to five separately-designated standing committees
shown in the table below along with the number of meetings held in
2021. All committees are chaired by and consist entirely of
independent directors. The Committee Chairs review and approve
agendas for all meetings of their respective
Committees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Committee
|
Compensation Committee |
Investment Committee
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
Executive Committee |
4 meetings |
12 meetings |
4 meetings |
6 meetings |
Met by UWC |
Christopher W. Claus |
|
• |
|
|
• |
Cynthia H. Davis |
|
|
|
• |
|
Jerry D. Davis, Jr. |
|
• |
• |
|
|
Dr. E. Dean Gage |
|
|
|
• |
• |
Francis A. Keating II |
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Terry S. Maness |
|
|
|
|
|
J. Keith Morgan |
|
|
• |
|
|
Gerald W. Shields (CEO) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Robert B. Sloan, Jr. |
•
|
|
|
• |
• |
Mary Taylor |
•
|
|
|
|
|
The primary responsibilities of each of the committees are defined
in its charter (other than the Executive Committee, which does not
have a charter) and summarized below. The charters for the Audit,
the Compensation and the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committees incorporate the requirements of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) and the NYSE to the extent applicable.
Current, printable versions of these charters are available on
Citizens’ website at https://www.citizensinc.com/english-investors-corporate-governance.
Audit Committee
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board’s
oversight and monitoring of:
•the
Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the
audits of its consolidated financial statements;
•the
adequacy of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting;
•the
integrity of the Company's consolidated financial
statements;
•the
qualifications and independence of the Company's independent
auditor;
•the
appointment, retention, performance, and compensation of the
Company's independent auditor and the performance of the internal
audit function;
•the
Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements related
to matters within the scope of the Committee’s
responsibilities;
•the
Company’s enterprise risk management program; and
•any
related party transactions.
Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The Board has determined that all of the members of the Audit
Committee are “financially literate” within the meaning of the NYSE
listing standards. In addition, the Board has determined that Dr.
Terry S. Maness (Chair) qualifies as an “audit committee financial
expert” within the meaning of applicable SEC regulations. For
additional information on the Audit Committee’s role and its
oversight of the Independent Auditor during 2021, see “Audit
Committee Report” on page
28.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee is responsible for:
•evaluating
and approving director and executive officer compensation, plans
and programs;
•reviewing
and taking actions with respect to incentive compensation and
equity-based plans;
•reviewing
market data to assess the competitive position of the Company’s
director and executive compensation;
•retaining
a compensation consultant to assist the committee and the Board in
evaluating director and executive officer
compensation;
•reviewing,
discussing and approving the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement; and
•evaluating
the risks and rewards associated with the Company’s compensation
policies and practices.
For additional information about the Compensation Committee, see
the section entitled “Executive Compensation—Compensation
Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page
31.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance committee is responsible
for:
•identifying,
recruiting and recommending candidates for the Board;
•developing,
approving, or recommending to the Board for approval, and
assessing, corporate governance policies for the
Company;
•overseeing
the evaluation of the Board; and
•apprising
the Board of corporate governance developments and practices,
considering the long-term best interests of the Company’s
shareholders.
Investment Committee
The Investment Committee is responsible for:
•overseeing
the management of the Company’s investment activities;
•reviewing
the performance of management and engaged investment advisors;
and
•ensuring
conformance of the Company’s investments with the Company’s
investment guidelines and relevant regulations.
Executive Committee
The Executive Committee exercises the powers of the Board, as
needed, in between regularly scheduled Board meetings. The Board
then reviews and ratifies the actions of the Executive Committee.
In 2021, the Executive Committee did not meet in person but acted
by unanimous written consent of the members three
times.
SUCCESSION PLANNING
Our Board oversees our Chief Executive Officer succession planning.
Gerald W. Shields was appointed Interim Chief Executive Officer on
August 5, 2020, upon the resignation of our former Chief Executive
Officer, Geoffrey Kolander, in connection with a change-in-control
of the Company. From August 2020 and throughout 2021, the Board
engaged an independent third party search firm to conduct a search
for a new Chief Executive Officer. After interviewing several
candidates, the Board appointed Mr. Shields as Chief Executive
Officer, effective January 1, 2022.
The Board is in the process of working with Mr. Shields to create a
new Chief Executive Officer succession plan, with the goal of
hiring a new Chief Executive Officer at the expiration of Mr.
Shield’s Employment Agreement, which is scheduled for December 31,
2023.
BOARD PROCESSES
BOARD AND COMMITTEE EVALUATION PROCESS
The Board and each committee conduct an annual self-assessment.
This evaluation is intended to assess whether the Board and the
committees are functioning effectively. As part of this
self-assessment, the directors are asked to consider the Board’s
role, relations with management, composition and meetings. Each
committee is asked to consider its role and the responsibilities
articulated in the committee’s charter, the composition of the
committee and the committee meetings. The self-assessment responses
and comments are compiled by the Secretary of the Company and
presented to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for
initial review. The responses and comments are reviewed with each
committee and the full Board and are utilized by the Board and each
committee to improve their operations and processes.
In early 2022, in preparation for the 2022 Annual Meeting, we began
conducting individual assessments of each director as well. Our
Chairman and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee participated on each call with each of the other
directors. The purpose of these calls was to get one-on-one
feedback of such director’s contributions to the Board and
follow-up with respect to their Board and committee
assessments.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company identifies related persons using known business
affiliations, quarterly disclosure meetings and information
provided by directors and executive officers in their annual
questionnaires.
The Company has in place the following process controls to identify
and approve transactions with related persons:
•Management
discusses related persons and affiliates as a standing agenda item
during each quarterly disclosure meeting. Management requires that
any new related person or affiliate transactions or changes to
previously identified related party transactions be
reported;
•Potential
related and affiliated party transactions are reviewed and analyzed
at the affiliated entity/ subsidiary level (within the Citizens,
Inc. holding company structure) and, if deemed to be affiliated
transactions, those transactions are evaluated for consolidated
financial reporting purposes as part of quarterly financial
reporting and entry support is provided for each transaction;
and
•Each
director and executive officer completes an annual questionnaire
that identifies any related person transactions. These forms are
reviewed by the Company's legal counsel and by the
Board.
All related person transactions must be approved by the Audit
Committee in accordance with the Audit Committee
charter.
When a related person transaction is proposed, the Audit Committee
reviews: (1) the related person’s name and relationship to the
Company; (2) the person’s interest in the transaction with the
Company, including the related person’s position or relationship
with, or ownership in, a firm, corporation, or other entity that is
a party to or has an interest in the transaction; and (3) the
approximate dollar value of the amount involved in the transaction,
the nature and business purpose of the transaction and the related
party’s interest in the transaction.
The Company is not aware of any transaction, or series of
transactions, since January 1, 2021, or any currently proposed
transactions to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is to
be a party, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 in a
single fiscal year and in which any director, nominee for director,
executive officer, 5% shareholder or any member of the immediate
family of the foregoing persons had, or will have, a direct or
indirect material interest.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER
PARTICIPATION
Each of Jerry D. Davis, Jr., Dr. Robert B. Sloan, Jr. and
Christopher W. Claus served as a member of the Compensation
Committee during 2021 and currently serves on the Compensation
Committee. None of the members of the Compensation Committee is or
has been an executive officer of the Company, nor did any of them
have any relationships requiring disclosure by the Company under
Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K. None of the Company’s executive
officers served as a director or a member of a compensation
committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of
any other entity, an executive officer of which served as a
director of the Company or member of the Compensation Committee
during 2021.
COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD
The Board has established a process to facilitate communication by
shareholders and other interested parties with directors.
Communications can be addressed to directors in care of the
Secretary of the Company at:
Citizens, Inc.
P. O. Box 149151
Austin, TX 78714-9151.
Communications may be distributed to all directors, or to any
individual director, as appropriate. At the direction of the Board,
all mail received may be opened and screened for security purposes.
In addition, items that are unrelated to the duties and
responsibilities of the Board shall not be distributed. Such items
include but are not limited to: spam; junk mail and mass mailings;
product complaints or inquiries; new product suggestions; resumes
and other forms of job inquiries; surveys; and business
solicitations or advertisements.
In addition, material that is trivial, obscene, unduly hostile,
threatening or illegal or similarly unsuitable items will be
excluded; however, any communication that is excluded will be made
available to any independent, non-employee director upon
request.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The following table shows information regarding the compensation
earned or paid during 2021 to members of the Board, none of whom
were Company employees during 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)
|
Stock Awards
($)
(1)
|
All Other Compensation
($)
|
TOTAL
($)
|
Christopher W. Claus |
112,500 |
10,499 |
— |
122,999 |
Cynthia H. Davis |
43,750 |
8,748 |
— |
52,498 |
Jerry D. Davis, Jr. |
112,500 |
10,499 |
— |
122,999 |
Dr. E. Dean Gage |
105,000 |
10,499 |
— |
115,499 |
Francis A. Keating |
112,500 |
10,499 |
— |
122,999 |
Dr. Terry S. Maness |
112,500 |
10,499 |
— |
122,999 |
J. Keith Morgan |
43,750 |
8,748 |
— |
52,498 |
Gerald W. Shields
(2)
|
— |
|
10,499 |
— |
10,499 |
Dr. Robert B. Sloan, Jr. |
115,000 |
10,499 |
— |
125,499 |
Mary Taylor |
43,750 |
8,748 |
— |
52,498 |
Constance K. Weaver
(3)
|
43,750 |
— |
— |
43,750 |
(1)The
amounts reported in the Stock Awards column reflect the aggregate
grant date fair value of awards of RSUs computed in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 718 (“ASC Topic 718”). The grant date fair value
is measured based on the closing price of the Company’s Class A
common stock on the date of grant. See Note 11 to the Company’s
audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2021, included in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Each non-employee director who was elected at our June 2, 2021
annual meeting received an annual director award of 2,023 RSUs on
June 2, 2021, the date of the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Each of the RSUs will vest one year from the date of grant, June 2,
2022. As of December 31, 2021, each such non-employee director held
2,023 RSUs.
Ms. Davis, Mr. Morgan and Ms. Taylor were each appointed to the
Board on August 1, 2021 and each received 1,632 RSUs on that date,
reflecting the annual pro-rata amount received by each director
elected at the 2021
Annual Meeting. These RSUs will also vest on June 2, 2022. As of
December 31, 2021, each of Ms. Davis, Mr. Morgan and Ms. Taylor
held 1,632 RSUs.
(2)Mr.
Shields was not an employee during 2021. Since the consulting
agreement under which he served as our Interim Chief Executive
Officer did not provide for any equity compensation, he received
his non-employee director RSUs in 2021. The amount reflected in
this table is also included in the Summary Compensation Table on
page
46.
(3)Ms.
Weaver did not stand for re-election to the Board in 2021 due to
employment obligations. The amount reported in the Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash Column reflects the prorated cash retainer and fees
for service as director paid until the expiration of her term, June
1, 2021.
Narrative to the Director Compensation Table
Non-employee directors receive compensation for their service on
the Board as follows (amounts are per year, beginning as of the
date of election and paid in 24 equal installments throughout the
year, subject to continued service):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual cash retainer |
$105,000 |
Additional cash retainer for Chair of the Board and Chair of each
committee of the Board (per chair) |
$10,000 |
Annual Equity retainer (RSUs) |
$10,500 |
We also provide up to a $5,000 reimbursement to each director for
director education. This amount is not reflected in the
compensation table above, as we consider it a normal course
reimbursement necessary for a director to provide service to the
Company. Directors do not receive fees for attending Board or
Committee meetings. No other compensation was paid to our
non-employee directors.
The annual equity retainer is paid in the form of RSUs, which are
granted on the date of each annual meeting of shareholders (each,
an “Annual Director Award”). In 2021, the seven non-employee
directors who were elected at the annual meeting of stockholders
held on June 2, 2021 (Claus, J. Davis, Gage, Keating, Maness,
Shields and Sloan), each received 2,023 RSUs. Ms. Davis, Mr. Morgan
and Ms. Taylor were each appointed on August 1, 2021 and each
received a pro-rated amount of the annual equity retainer, which
resulted in an award of 1,632 RSUs. The number of RSUs subject to
each Annual Director Award was determined by dividing the awarded
annual equity retainer value by the per share closing price of the
Company’s Class A common stock on the date of grant and rounding to
the nearest whole share. The RSUs have a one-year vesting schedule
to coincide with each director's term of office. Upon vesting, the
Company will deliver one share of Class A common stock for each
RSU.
The Compensation Committee annually reviews each element of and the
total compensation of our non-employee director compensation
program. During 2021, the Compensation Committee worked with Pearl
Meyer, our independent compensation consultants, to evaluate the
director compensation program in light of the Company's adoption of
a new peer group ("New Peer Group", see discussion in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis below). Pearl Meyer provided
the Compensation Committee with an analysis of the competitiveness
of the Company's non-employee director compensation program in
effect at the time, market observations, and relevant compensation
trends and based upon such review determined that our director
compensation was below market (at the 10th
percentile of the New Peer Group) and that total board cost was
also below market (at the 25th
percentile). The below-market compensation is due primarily to the
low value of the annual equity retainer. Although Pearl Meyer’s
recommendations included a phased approach to increasing the annual
equity retainer and cash retainers for chair positions in order to
bring total non-employee director compensation closer to the median
of the New Peer Group, the Compensation Committee determined not to
take any action during 2021 due to (i) the larger than average
board size, and (ii) the Company’s decrease in available cash on
hand from 2020 to 2021 due to the severance payment to Geoffrey
Kolander and purchase of the Class B common stock.
AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS
|
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 2:
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF OUR INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
|
What Am I Voting On? |
|
Holders of Class A common stock are being asked to ratify the
appointment of Grant Thornton LLP to serve as the Company’s
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2022. |
|
Voting Recommendation: FOR |
|
Grant Thornton LLP is an independent registered public accounting
firm with significant expertise, reasonable fees and appropriately
limited ancillary services. The Audit Committee appointed Grant
Thornton LLP in June 2021 and believes that its retention continues
to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
One or more members of Grant Thornton are expected to attend the
Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if
they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to questions
at the Annual Meeting. |
|
Voting Standard: |
|
Proposal No. 2 will be approved if the votes cast
FOR
the proposal exceed the votes cast
AGAINST
it. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be disregarded and have
no impact on the vote, other than for establishing a
quorum.
|
|
APPOINTMENT AND OVERSIGHT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to
select, evaluate and, if necessary, replace our independent
registered public accounting firm. On June 16, 2021, the Audit
Committee dismissed Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and engaged
Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”) to serve as its independent
registered public accounting firm (the “Independent Auditor”) for
the year ending December 31, 2021. Deloitte had served as the
Company’s Independent Auditor since 2017 and Grant Thornton was
selected based on an evaluation of capabilities that would best
meet the needs of the Company based on the Company’s size and
market position. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and December
31, 2019: (i) Deloitte’s report on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements did not contain an adverse opinion or a
disclaimer of opinion, nor was the report qualified or modified as
to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles; (ii) for
such periods and the three months ended March 31, 2021, there were
no disagreements (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation
S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K) on
any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial
statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which
disagreement(s), if not resolved to the satisfaction of Deloitte,
would have caused Deloitte to make reference to the subject matter
of the disagreement(s) in connection with such reports; and (iii)
for such periods and the three months ended March 31, 2021, there
were no “reportable events” (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K).
During the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 and
through March 31, 2021, neither the Company nor anyone on its
behalf has consulted Grant Thornton with respect to (i) the
application of accounting principles to a specified transaction,
either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that
might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements; or (ii)
any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as
defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related
instructions) or a reportable event.
Our Audit Committee has appointed Grant Thornton as our Independent
Auditor to audit our consolidated financial statements for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. In considering Grant
Thornton’s appointment and compensation for audit and permitted
non-audit services, the Audit Committee considered, among other
factors:
•Grant
Thornton’s status as a registered public accounting firm with the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)
as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”)
and the Rules of the PCAOB;
•Grant
Thornton’s independence;
•external
data relating to Grant Thornton’s performance, including PCAOB
reports on Grant Thornton and its peer firms;
•the
firm’s capability and expertise in handling the complexity of the
Company’s operations;
•the
professional qualifications and experience of key members of the
engagement team, including the lead audit partner, for the audit of
the Company’s consolidated financial statements; and
•the
appropriateness of the Independent Auditor’s fees, on both an
absolute basis and as compared to its peer firms.
The members of the Audit Committee believe that the continued
retention of Grant Thornton to serve as the Company’s Independent
Auditor is in the best interests of the Company and its
shareholders. Their appointment is being presented to the
shareholders for ratification. If the shareholders do not ratify
this appointment, the Audit Committee will consider such results
and determine whether to recommend and appoint a different
independent registered public accounting firm to audit our
consolidated financial statements in the future.
AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL OF SERVICES
To help assure independence of the Independent Auditor, our Audit
Committee has established a policy whereby all audit, review,
attest and non-audit engagements of the principal accountant or
other firms must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee;
provided, however, that de minimis non-audit services may instead
be approved in accordance with applicable SEC rules. This policy is
set forth in our Audit Committee Charter. Of the fees shown in the
table which were billed by our Independent Auditors in 2021 and
2020, 100% were approved by the Audit Committee.
FEES
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the
following fees were billed to us by Deloitte:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUDIT FEES |
2021 |
2020 |
Audit Fees |
$278,958 |
$1,347,565 |
Audit-Related Fees |
$20,213 |
— |
Tax Fees |
— |
— |
All Other Fees |
— |
— |
TOTAL |
$299,171 |
$1,347,565 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, the following fees
were billed to us by Grant Thornton:
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUDIT FEES |
2021 |
Audit Fees |
$1,030,320 |
Audit-Related Fees |
— |
|
Tax Fees |
— |
|
All Other Fees |
— |
|
TOTAL |
$1,030,320 |
AUDIT COMMITTEE AND MEETINGS
The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities relating to the Company’s financial statements,
financial reporting process, internal controls, internal audit
function and annual independent audit. In their oversight role, the
members of the Audit Committee rely without independent
verification on the information provided to them and on the
representations made by our management and the Independent
Auditor.
The Audit Committee is comprised of all independent directors who
meet the financial literacy requirements of the NYSE and
additional, heightened independence criteria applicable to members
of the Audit Committee under SEC and NYSE rules. The Board has
designated Dr. Terry S. Maness (Chairman) as “Audit Committee
financial expert” under the SEC rules.
Regular audit committee meetings generally take place immediately
before a Board meeting to maximize interaction with the Board. The
Audit Committee also meets before the Company issues its quarterly
and annual financial results. The meetings typically include the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, along with
other members of senior management, and the internal
auditors.
At each regular committee meeting, the Audit Committee conducts a
review session at which senior management provides briefings on
current issues, trends and developments, and is briefed by the
Chief Financial Officer on the Company's financial results and the
Chief Information Security Officer on information security matters.
In addition, the internal auditors provide their report.
Representatives of the Independent Auditor attend the meeting and
present their findings. The Audit Committee also meets separately
with the Independent Auditor representatives and/or the lead audit
partner upon request. The Audit Committee reports regularly to the
Board.
PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES AND 2021 ACTIONS
The Audit Committee represents and assists the Board in fulfilling
its oversight responsibility relating to the integrity of the
Company’s financial statements, financial reporting process and
system of internal controls, including the internal audit function.
The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s compliance with legal,
regulatory and public disclosure requirements, and the Independent
Auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance. The Audit
Committee also generally oversees the Company’s overall enterprise
risk management program and approves any related party
transactions.
During 2021, among other things, the Audit Committee:
•Reviewed
and discussed with management the Company’s quarterly and annual
results;
•Appointed
Grant Thornton and dismissed Deloitte as the Company’s independent
auditor;
•Reviewed
the activities and findings of the Company’s internal audit
function;
•Actively
engaged with the Chief Information Security Officer on security and
cybersecurity matters and reviewed information security and
cybersecurity risks;
•Reviewed
compliance risks, including anti-money laundering risks, with the
Company’s compliance officer;
•Reviewed
the Audit Committee charter;
•Performed
a self-assessment; and
•Met
independently with the independent auditor.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Management is responsible for preparing our consolidated financial
statements and the reporting process and Grant Thornton, our
Independent Auditor, is responsible for auditing those financial
statements in accordance with auditing standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB). The
Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the conduct of these
activities by our management and the Independent
Auditor.
The Audit Committee is also responsible for establishing procedures
to address complaints regarding accounting, internal control or
auditing issues, as well as the anonymous submission by employees
of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters. In this
context, the Audit Committee routinely meets and holds discussions
with management and the Independent Auditor. Management represented
to the Audit Committee that our consolidated financial statements
were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), and the Audit
Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial
statements with management and the Independent
Auditor.
During 2021, the Audit Committee:
•Reviewed
and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with
management;
•Discussed
with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed
by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC;
•Received
the written disclosures and the letter from the independent
accountant required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB
regarding the independent accountant's communications with the
audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the
independent accountant the independent accountant's independence;
and
•Based
on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit
Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial
statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2021, for filing with the
SEC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Dr. Terry S. Maness (Chairman)
Dr. Robert B. Sloan, Jr.
Mary Taylor
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The Executive Officers of the Company are appointed by, and serve
at the discretion of, the Board of Directors. The following sets
forth certain information as of the date of this proxy statement
regarding our Executive Officers:
Gerald W. Shields, 64
Chief Executive Officer and President
See the discussion under “Board
Nominees”
for Mr. Shields’ information.
Jeffery P. Conklin, 52
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Chief
Investment Officer
Professional Experience:
Mr. Conklin joined the Company in May 2017 and has served as Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer since September 20, 2019. He has
also served as Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and
Treasurer of the Company since September 2017, and Chief Investment
Officer since March 2019. Prior to assuming his current positions,
Mr. Conklin served as Interim Chief Financial Officer from March
2019 to September 20, 2019, and Vice President, Chief Accounting
Officer from May 2017 to September 2017. Mr. Conklin came to the
Company with over 20 years of life insurance and financial
reporting experience, having worked at American International
Group, Inc. from 2004 to 2017 in various capacities, including Vice
President of Financial Reporting and Vice President of Special
Projects. In addition to financial reporting, Mr. Conklin brings
the Company expertise in budgeting, financial analysis and
implementation of strategic accounting initiatives.
Education:
B. A. – Business / Accounting, Olivet
College
Sheryl Kinlaw, 53
Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
Professional Experience:
Ms. Kinlaw was appointed as Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and
Secretary of the Company in July 2021. She previously served as
Interim Chief Legal Officer from April 2021 until her appointment
in July 2021 and has provided outside counsel services to the
Company since March 2020. Prior to joining Citizens as Chief Legal
Officer, Ms. Kinlaw was principal of her own law firm since 2013
where she provided dedicated outsourced general counsel and
specialized legal counsel services. Clients included both insurance
carriers and independent marketing organizations that distribute
insurance products. Prior to forming her own law firm, Ms. Kinlaw
served as a partner and the securities practice chair at Culhane
Meadows, PLLC, and senior level counsel for two public companies–
FIC Insurance Group (Austin) and THQ (Los Angeles). Ms. Kinlaw is
licensed to practice law in Colorado and Texas.
Education: B.A.
– Economics / International Studies, University of California, Los
Angeles (UCLA)
J.D. – University of Texas School of Law
Robert M. Mauldin, III, 61
Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer
Professional Experience:
Mr. Mauldin has served as Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer
of the Company since joining the Company in July 2017. Mr. Mauldin
came to the Company with over 25 years of experience in marketing,
product management and innovation and implementing numerous
industry-first initiatives that continue to shape the financial
services industry today. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Mauldin
served as Senior Vice President, Operations at USI Inc. from
September 2015 to July 2017 and Senior Vice President, Marketing at
Bank of America from 1992 to September 2015. Mr. Mauldin brings
expertise in product development, project management, change
management, process improvement, strategic planning and innovation
to the Company.
Education: B.
A. – Political Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel
Hill
Harvey J. L. Waite, 61
Vice President, Chief Actuary
Professional Experience:
Mr. Waite has served as Vice President, Chief Actuary of the
Company since April 2020. Prior to assuming his current position,
Mr. Waite served as Interim Chief Actuary from August 2018 to April
2020 and Pricing Actuary Consultant from November 2017 to July
2018. Mr. Waite came to the Company with over 20 years of
actuarial, product and financial experience, including life
insurance company experience. Previously, Mr. Waite worked at Bank
of America from 2006 to 2017 in various capacities, including
Senior Vice President, Actuarial Risk Executive, and Senior Vice
President, Credit Risk Executive. Prior to that, Mr. Waite served
as Vice President, Actuary at Fleet Credit Card Services (which was
acquired by Bank of America in 2004) from 2000 to 2006. Mr. Waite
also served in various capacities at Academy Life Insurance Company
(an AEGON company) from 1996 to 2000, including Vice President and
Chief Actuary and Assistant Vice President and
Actuary.
Education: HBSc
– Mathematics / Actuarial Science, University of Western
Ontario
Professional Designations:
FSA, MAAA
|
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 3:
ANNUAL ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(“Say-on-Pay”)
|
|
What Am I Voting On? |
|
Holders of Class A common stock are being asked to approve, on an
advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as
described in the Executive Compensation section of this proxy
statement.
|
|
Voting Recommendation: FOR |
Our Compensation Committee provides independent oversight of our
executive compensation with the assistance of an independent
compensation consultant. We believe our executive compensation
program is working effectively and is aligned with our business
goals and strategy and demonstrates a strong link between pay and
performance. |
|
Voting Standard: |
|
Proposal No. 3 will be approved if the votes cast
FOR
the proposal exceed the votes cast
AGAINST
it. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be disregarded and have
no impact on the vote, other than for establishing a
quorum.
|
|
Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the
Company or the Board. However, the Compensation Committee will
consider the outcome of the vote when considering future executive
pay.
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the
compensation of our named executive officers (“Named Executive
Officers”) for 2021, and the compensation philosophy and objectives
on which it is based. Our Named Executive Officers for 2021
were:
•Gerald
W. Shields*,
Chief Executive Officer and President
•Jeffery
P. Conklin,
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Chief
Investment Officer
•Sheryl
Kinlaw,
Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
•Robert
M. Mauldin III,
Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer
•Harvey
J. L. Waite,
Vice President,
Chief Actuary
*
During 2021, Mr. Shields served as Interim Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to an independent Consulting Agreement, which governed the
terms of his compensation. Mr. Shields’ compensation arrangement
during 2021 is described below in the section entitled “Consulting
Agreement with Mr. Shields” on page
48.
Mr. Shields was appointed Chief Executive Officer and President
effective January 1, 2022. His employment agreement was filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on December 21, 2021.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through 2016 |
|
Throughout most of our history, the Company was led and controlled
by our founder Harold E. Riley and his family members. Mr. Riley’s
compensation philosophy was to pay only cash compensation to the
executive officers and historically, Citizens did not include
performance-based incentives or equity awards in its executive
compensation program.
|
|
|
Cash Compensation only |
|
(non-performance based) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
In 2017, after the appointment of Geoffrey Kolander as Chief
Executive Officer, the Company engaged an independent compensation
consultant for the first time and following its compensation
review, the Compensation Committee implemented pay-for-performance
elements in the executive compensation program.
In 2017, our shareholders approved our first equity incentive plan,
the Citizens, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan, which allowed us to
incorporate long-term equity as a component of our executive
compensation program.
|
|
|
•Added
pay-for-performance elements for first time
|
|
◦Cash
incentive-based bonuses
|
|
|
|
•Shareholders
approved our first equity incentive plan
|
|
As illustrated below, we have made progress with our executive
compensation program since 2017. We have listened to our
shareholders, engaged Pearl Meyer as a strategic partner with
respect to our compensation program, and revised our peer group to
better reflect our company, industry and financial
size.
|
|
|
2018 |
•Added
equity - based incentive compensation to enhance alignment of
executives and shareholders
|
◦RSUs
with 2-year time-based vesting terms
|
|
|
|
2020 |
Based on negative say-on-pay vote at 2019 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, implemented formulaic scorecard to assess and measure
performance for annual incentives
|
|
|
|
2021 |
•Incorporated
more quantifiable financial and operating metrics in annual
incentive program to give less discretion in awarding
bonuses
|
•Awarded
RSUs based on achievement of performance goals and once received,
lengthened vesting period to 3 years
|
•In
December 2021, entered into new CEO agreement (effective January 1,
2022) with market-based compensation below the median of our peer
group and standard double trigger severance provisions
|
As a result of this progress, not only do we believe that our
executive compensation program is better aligned with our peer
companies (as discussed below), but we have been able to reduce our
overall executive compensation for the Named Executive Officers as
follows during the last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary |
Bonus |
Stock Awards |
Non- Equity Incentive Plan Compensation |
All Other Compensation
(4)
|
Total |
2019
(1)
|
$ 2,328,379 |
$300,000 |
$ 2,980,015 |
$ 1,688,600 |
61,243 |
$ 7,358,237 |
2020
(2)
|
2,276,433 |
125,000 |
1,881,947 |
1,087,812 |
530,018 |
5,901,210 |
2021
(3)
|
2,092,945 |
0 |
609,912 |
1,037,430 |
161,892 |
3,902,179 |
(1)Subject
to footnote 4 below, compensation data is as disclosed in Summary
Compensation Table included in Schedule 14A Proxy Statement filed
with the SEC on April 23, 2020.
(2)Subject
to footnote 4 below, compensation data is as disclosed in Summary
Compensation Table included in Schedule 14A Proxy Statement filed
with the SEC on April 20, 2021.
(3)Subject
to footnote 4 below, compensation data is as disclosed in Summary
Compensation Table on page
46
herein.
(4)Excludes
a one-time severance payment to the former Chief Financial Officer
in 2019 in the amount of $28,125 and a one-time severance payment
to the former Chief Executive Officer in 2020 in the amount of
$8,800,000.
THE ROLE OF SHAREHOLDERS; SAY-ON-PAY
The Company is committed to delivering increasing shareholder value
through sustainable growth. We believe that, as part of this
commitment, it is important to maintain ongoing dialogue with
shareholders to solicit and respond to feedback about our executive
compensation programs.
In April 2021, for the first time in over 30 years, we became a
non-controlled company. We immediately established a formal
investor relation function, led by our Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Legal Officer. We reviewed the concerns that our shareholders
had in 2019 and 2020 that led to negative say-on-pay votes in those
two years and despite a
76%
approval in 2021, reached out to shareholders after becoming a
non-controlled company in an effort to understand their ongoing
concerns.
What We Heard
Through these engagement efforts, we received a range of helpful
and insightful responses and feedback. Commentary focused on the
following:
•Shareholders
are happy that we are no longer a controlled company and welcomed
the opportunity to discuss compensation-related matters directly
with the Company.
•Shareholders
were not happy with our former chief executive officer’s
compensation package and appreciated our commitment to create a
compensation package for the new incumbent that was in-line with
market standards, specifically market pay-for-performance
compensation and no single-trigger severance
provisions.
•Shareholders
wanted to see awards of performance-based RSUs or PSUs that have
different metrics than our non-equity incentive plan
awards.
•A
shareholder asked us to implement Stock Ownership Guidelines in
order to better align director and executive officer interests with
shareholder interests.
How We Responded
Based on our 2021 shareholder outreach program and changes we made
to our executive compensation program in early 2021, we received a
positive say-on-pay advisory vote at our 2021 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, with 76%
voting in favor of our executive compensation program. While
pleased with the positive vote, we continue making changes to
improve our program, including the following changes:
•We
optimized our peer group to better reflect our Company's
competitive profile (see “Peer Company Data” starting on
page
36);
•We
made changes to our CEO compensation package to bring it in line
with market expectations and peer group CEO compensation,
drastically reducing overall costs to the Company;
•We
Implemented performance-based RSU awards for our executive officers
that are only awarded if the pre-approved performance-based goals
are met. These RSUs also carry 3-year vesting terms to enhance
retention of our executive officers and align their interests with
those of our shareholders; and
•We
implemented Stock Ownership Guidelines for our directors, CEO and
other Section 16 officers.
Changes to our Chief Executive Officer Compensation
In December 2021, the Board appointed Mr. Shields as the Chief
Executive Officer, effective January 1, 2022, and entered into an
Employment Agreement with him (the “Shields Employment Agreement”).
During the search for a permanent Chief Executive Officer, the
Compensation Committee worked extensively with Pearl Meyer, the
Company’s external compensation consultant, to structure a market
compensation package. The Shields Employment Agreement reflects
this structure and provides the following:
Base salary: $775,000
Short-term cash incentive opportunity: target of
$600,000
Long-term equity incentive opportunity: target of
$250,000
Relocation payment: $15,000
Additionally, the Shields Employment Agreement contains a standard,
double-trigger severance payment in the event he is terminated in
connection with a change-in-control of the Company, with pay
limited to two times the sum of Mr. Shield's base salary at the
time of termination and Mr. Shields' most recent annual bonus. The
initial term of the Shields Employment Agreement is two
years.
The chart below compares Mr. Kolander’s compensation in 2019 and
2020 (the compensation that received the negative say-on-pay vote)
to the compensation offered to Mr. Shields pursuant to his
Employment Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
Salary: |
Kolander: |
$1,000,000 |
Shields: |
$775,000 |
|
|
Non-Performance Based Compensation: |
Kolander: |
$300,000 cash retention bonus and $1,000,000 fully vested
RSUs |
Shields: |
$0 |
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Target Compensation (cash): |
Kolander |
$1,200,000 |
Shields: |
$600,000 |
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Target Compensation (equity): |
Kolander: |
$1,200,000 |
Shields: |
$250,000 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES
We have adopted the following compensation policies and practices
to help achieve our compensation philosophy and
objectives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay for Performance |
A substantial portion of compensation for our Named Executive
Officers is performance-based and aligned with creation of
shareholder value through an annual incentive cash bonus and
long-term equity grants that are only awarded if pre-approved
performance goals are achieved. |
No pension or other special benefits |
We do not provide pensions or supplemental executive retirement,
health or insurance benefits. |
Limited perquisites |
We provide very limited perquisites to our Named Executive
Officers. |
Stock Ownership Guidelines |
We require our Named Executive Officers to hold a certain amount of
the Company’s Class A common stock. |
Prohibition on hedging, pledging and short sales |
We prohibit short sales, transactions in derivatives, hedging and
pledging of our securities by our Named Executive
Officers. |
Development of Peer Group |
We seek to align our Named Executive Officers’ compensation so that
it is competitive with our industry peers. |
Independent Compensation Committee |
Our Compensation Committee is comprised of 100% independent
members. |
Independent compensation consultant |
The Compensation Committee has directly retained Pearl Meyer as an
independent compensation consultant. |
WHAT GUIDES OUR PROGRAM
Our Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain
and motivate high-performing executive officers and rewards them
for achieving strategic goals that enhance shareholder value. We
are guided by the following philosophy and objectives:
•Compensation
should be competitive.
Our total compensation should be competitive with our peer
companies to enable us to attract and retain the best executive
talent possible. In developing competitive compensation programs,
we review compensation from companies in our peer group companies
and also use survey sources which include compensation data of
executive officers of financial services and insurance
companies.
•Compensation
should be tied to performance.
In order to align our executive compensation program with our
strategic business goals, we pay for performance. Annual incentive
bonus opportunities consisting of cash and equity grants in the
form of performance-based RSUs are evaluated annually based on
achievement of pre-set milestones that are established based on the
Company's highest priorities.
•Compensation
should focus on creating enduring value for our
shareholders.
We believe that the use of long-term equity incentives serves to
retain our executive officers and encourage them to focus on the
Company’s long-term performance and success, and aligns executive
compensation with the interests of our shareholders. Accordingly,
we grant our executive officers RSUs that once earned, vest over
three years.
Key Elements of Executive Compensation
The key elements of our executive compensation program include an
annual base salary and an annual bonus opportunity that consists of
both cash and equity.
•Base
Salary.
This is
fixed
compensation and is measured primarily by
individual
experience and knowledge brought to such position. The purpose is
to compensate executive officers fairly for the responsibility of
the position held.
•Annual
Bonus Opportunity.
This is
variable
compensation and is measured primarily by
corporate
performance.
◦Cash
Incentive Bonus.
Purpose is to motivate and reward executive officers for achieving
our short-term business objectives.
◦Equity
Incentive Bonus.
Purposes are to: (1) motivate executive officers by linking
incentives to the achievement of our annual performance goals and
the performance of our Class A common stock over the long term; and
(2) reinforce the link between the interests of our executive
officers and shareholders.
The Compensation Committee’s goal is to create a competitive
compensation package for each Named Executive Officer using the
Competitive Compensation Data (as described below in the section
titled “Peer Company Data”) to help determine each element of our
executive pay.
THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
The Role of the Compensation Committee.
Our executive compensation program is administered by the
Compensation Committee, which is composed entirely of independent
directors. The Compensation Committee is responsible for designing
our executive compensation program, including each element of the
program, and determining and approving total executive
compensation. Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews a
competitive analysis and assessment of our executive compensation
and approves executive compensation based on this review. The
Compensation Committee’s decisions with respect to our executive
officers’ compensation are then reviewed and approved by the
independent members of the Board.
The Role of the Chief Executive Officer.
At the Compensation Committee’s request, the Chief Executive
Officer provides input regarding the performance and appropriate
compensation of the other Named Executive Officers. The
Compensation Committee considers the Chief Executive Officer’s
evaluation and his direct knowledge of each executive officer’s
performance and contributions when making compensation decisions.
The Chief Executive Officer is not present during voting or
deliberations by the Compensation Committee regarding his own
compensation.
The Role of the Compensation Consultant.
The Compensation Committee engaged
Pearl Meyer as its independent compensation consultant in 2021. The
Compensation Committee selects and retains Pearl Meyer’s services
and annually reviews their performance. As part of the review
process, the Compensation Committee considers the independence of
the compensation consultant in accordance with SEC rules. During
2021, Pearl Meyer provided no services to the Company other than
services for the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee
therefore concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would
prevent Pearl Meyer from serving as an independent consultant to
the Compensation Committee.
In 2021, Pearl Meyer worked with the Compensation Committee to
evaluate the following:
•CEO
compensation
•Executive
officer compensation
•Director
compensation
•Peer
Group
As part of this evaluation, Pearl Meyer researched and analyzed
industry compensation data sources and compensation data from the
Company’s peer group of comparable public companies in order to
assess the competitiveness and reasonableness of the Company’s
compensation programs. Based on this analysis, Pearl Meyer
recommended to the Committee (i) levels of compensation for a new
Chief Executive Officer, depending on experience (proven or
emerging), (ii) potential changes to director compensation (see
discussion on page
25),
and (iii) a revised peer group (see discussion below).
Peer Company Data.
The use of compensation data from a peer group of public companies
that are comparable in industry, size (e.g., assets, market
capitalization) and performance (the “Peer Company Data”) is an
important aspect of determining our executive compensation. Since
we compete for executive talent with comparable companies,
utilizing the Peer Company Data helps us create a competitive
compensation program that is structured to be compatible with our
pay-for-performance compensation philosophy.
As disclosed in our 2021 Proxy Statement, in setting executive
officer compensation for 2021, the Compensation Committee used Peer
Company Data from the following comparable companies (the “2020 /
2021 Peer Group”):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
° |
American Equity Investment Life Holding Company |
° |
MBIA Inc. |
° |
AMERISAFE, Inc. |
° |
National Western Life Group, Inc. |
° |
FBL Financial Group, Inc. |
° |
On Deck Capital, Inc. |
° |
FedNat Holding Company |
° |
Primerica, Inc. |
° |
HCI Group, Inc. |
° |
Regional Management Corp. |
° |
Globe Life Inc. (formerly known as Torchmark Corp.) |
° |
World Acceptance Corporation |
° |
Independence Holding Company |
|
|
In June 2021, as part of our ongoing efforts to improve our
executive compensation program, Pearl Meyer evaluated our 2020 /
2021 Peer Group and determined that (i) it was smaller than peer
groups established by other public companies based on Pearl Meyer’s
experience, (ii) there was very limited overlap with the peer group
used by proxy advisory firm ISS in its review of the Company's
executive compensation programs, and (iii) three of the companies
(American Equity Investment Life Holding Company, Globe Life Inc.
and National Western Life Group, Inc.) had total assets greater
than the typical financial criteria range Pearl Meyer utilizes when
evaluating potential peer group candidates. Based upon such
evaluation, Pearl Meyer recommended, and our Compensation Committee
approved, a new peer group, consisting of the following companies
(collectively, the “New Peer Group”):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company (in order of assets) |
Primary Industry |
Total Assets* ($M) |
PRA Group, Inc. |
Consumer Finance |
$4,279 |
United Insurance Holdings Corp. |
Property and Casualty Insurance |
$2,803 |
Maiden Holdings, Ltd. |
Reinsurance |
$2,703 |
Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. |
Consumer Finance |
$2,096 |
Safety Insurance Group, Inc. |
Property and Casualty Insurance |
$2,046 |
Stewart Information Services Corporation |
Property and Casualty Insurance |
$2,043 |
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. |
Property and Casualty Insurance |
$2,015 |
Global Indemnity Group, LLC |
Property and Casualty Insurance |
$1,898 |
Medallion Financial Corp. |
Consumer Finance |
$1,689 |
AMERISAFE, Inc. |
Property and Casualty Insurance |
$1,495 |
CURO Group Holdings Corp. |
Consumer Finance |
$1,408 |
FedNat Holding Company |
Property and Casualty Insurance |
$1,286 |
EZCORP, Inc. |
Consumer Finance |
$1,196 |
Independence Holding Company |
Life and Health Insurance |
$1,125 |
Regional Management Corp. |
Consumer Finance |
$1,098 |
HCI Group, Inc. |
Property and Casualty Insurance |
$1,017 |
World Acceptance Corporation |
Consumer Finance |
$954 |
|
|
|
75th
Percentile
|
|
$2,046 |
50th
Percentile
|
|
$1,689 |
25th
Percentile
|
|
$1,196 |
|
|
|
Citizens, Inc. |
Life and Health Insurance |
$1,782 |
Percentile |
|
53% |
* Total Assets as of June 7, 2021, based on publicly disclosed
information as of such date.
We believe that the New Peer Group size is more in line with
typical practices since the larger number of peers reduces the
impact of outlier compensation practices on analysis outcomes. We
further believe that establishing a peer group that positions the
Company near the 50th
percentile is more in line with total asset criteria for peer
groups. Lastly, the New Peer Group is likely to have greater
overlap with the ISS peer group created to assess our 2021 pay
practices.
Information We Use to Determine Executive Compensation
As mentioned above, the use of Peer Company Data plays an important
role in determining our executive compensation. In addition to
reviewing Peer Company Data, Pearl Meyer reviewed data sourced from
LOMA, an international trade association for the insurance and
financial services industry (with the Peer Company Data,
collectively, the “Competitive Compensation Data”).
We review the Competitive Compensation Data as a reference point in
setting our executive officers’ base salaries and annual incentive
bonus opportunities to ensure that we are offering competitive
compensation packages to our named executive officers. The
Compensation Committee considered the Competitive Compensation Data
in setting executive officer compensation for 2021, and in
determining competitive compensation packages for newly hired or
promoted executive officers. The Compensation Committee believes,
based on feedback from Pearl Meyer, that in order for our executive
compensation program to be competitive, the Company should pay
total compensation to each executive officer of at least the
25th
percentile. The Compensation Committee started with the
25th
percentile of compensation in setting executive compensation levels
for 2021 and then considered additional factors, including the need
to have a competitive bonus opportunity in order to retain and
motivate the executive officers in light of the recent leadership
change, the Company’s 2020 performance and performance in early
2021, and an individual executive officer’s role and potential
contribution to the future success of the Company.
Additionally, throughout 2021, the Company conducted a search for a
permanent Chief Executive Officer, and Pearl Meyer assisted the
Compensation Committee in structuring a compensation package for a
new Chief Executive Officer. In June 2021, the New Peer Group was
established, as discussed above. Pearl Meyer used Peer Group Data
from the New Peer Group as part of new Competitive Compensation
Data to recommend to the Compensation Committee a Chief Executive
Officer compensation range. The recommendations included base
salary, short-term incentives and long-term incentives for both an
“emerging” and a “proven” Chief Executive Officer candidate. Based
upon Pearl Meyer’s recommendations, the Compensation Committee
established a compensation range to offer to a new Chief Executive
Officer, which included compensation at approximately the median of
peer group Chief Executive Officers for an experienced Chief
Executive Officer candidate and approximately the
25th
percentile
for an “emerging” Chief Executive Officer candidate. This
recommendation and approval was based on the Company’s position in
the 53% percentile of its New Peer Group.
2021 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISIONS IN DETAIL
Components of Total Compensation
Annual Base Salary
Annual base salary is a customary, fixed element of compensation
intended to attract and retain executive officers. Base salaries
are set when an executive officer is hired or promoted into his or
her position and may be modified based on each executive officer’s
experience, responsibilities, market demand and consideration of
the Competitive Compensation Data.
Based upon a review of the Competitive Compensation Data and other
considerations such as the Company’s 2020 performance and the
continued COVID-19 impact on the Company’s operations, except for
the increase in Mr. Shields’ consulting fee, the Compensation
Committee did not make any increases to the base salary levels of
the Company’s named executive officers in 2021. Ms. Kinlaw’s base
salary was set upon her appointment to her position on July 1, 2021
based on the Competitive Compensation Data.
Our Named Executive Officers were paid the following base salaries
for 2021:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers |
2021 |
Gerald W. Shields
(1)
|
$806,000 |
Jeffery P. Conklin |
$430,000 |
Sheryl Kinlaw
(2)
|
$300,000 |
Robert M. Mauldin III |
$350,000 |
Harvey J. L. Waite |
$340,000 |
(1)Prior
to January 1, 2022, Mr. Shield’s annual base salary was established
by the Shields Consulting Agreement, which in 2021 was increased
from $14,500 per week to $15,500 per week to reflect Mr. Shields’
leadership of and direction to the Company during the end of 2020,
while navigating through significant internal and external
disruptions, uncertainties and challenges including a change in
control, change in leadership, litigation and a global
pandemic.
(2)Ms.
Kinlaw’s base salary was pro-rated to reflect her July 1, 2021
employment date and thus the actual base salary amount received was
$150,000.
Annual Bonus Opportunity
Our executive officers are eligible to earn annually a bonus that
consists of a cash incentive (the “Cash Bonus”) and an equity
incentive (the “Equity Bonus” and collectively with the Cash Bonus,
the “Annual Bonus”). The Annual Bonus is designed to place at risk
a portion of each officer’s total direct compensation and pay for
performance delivered during the year.
There are
three steps
to establishing the Annual Bonus opportunity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Establish Performance Objectives ("Milestones") |
At the beginning of the year, the Compensation Committee, with
input from the Chief Executive Officer, establishes the performance
objectives for the year. The goal of the performance objectives is
to tie the Annual Bonus opportunity to achievement of the Company’s
highest priorities (short-term goals) within our strategic
initiatives (longer-term goals).
In 2021, the performance objectives (the “2021 Milestones”)
were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Year Sales Increase |
|
Improve Policy Retention |
|
Roadmap Execution |
|
Financials & Expense Discipline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Achieve first year sales of $x million annualized
premium.
Targets
are established by business segment, with specific targets for
payout at 80% of goal, 100% of goal and 120% of goal for EACH of
International Life Insurance, Domestic Life Insurance and Home
Services Insurance.
|
|
Improve 1st year policy retention (Measured on 15-month
renewal).
Targets
are established by business segment with specific targets for
payout at 80% of retention goal, 100% of retention goal and 120%
retention goal for EACH of International Life Insurance and Home
Services Insurance.
|
|
Maintain and execute on the approved 5 Quarter
Roadmap:
•Focus
on delivering the approved roadmap to improve sales and service
across the 3 markets and 3 sales levers (Product, Promotions and
Process)
•Deliver
xx new products across International, Domestic and Home Service
markets
•Execute
on Home Services Insurance transformation plan
•Execute
on LDTI to successfully meet LDTI schedule and budget
|
|
•120
% Payout Stretch Goal: Positive Net Pre-tax income
•100%
Payout Goal: Break even Net Pre-tax income
•80%
Payout goal: Achieve budgeted Net Pre-tax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Setting the Annual Bonus Opportunity |
The Annual Bonus opportunity for each Named Executive Officer is
set by the Compensation Committee, based on peer group analysis
provided by Pearl Meyer, as described above in “Information We Use
to Determine Executive Compensation”. In 2021, the Compensation
Committee lowered the target Annual Bonus opportunity from the 2020
level to (i) better reflect the Competitive Compensation Data, and
(ii) to further refine the Annual Bonus opportunity to allow for an
increased bonus based on exceeding the 2021 Milestones,
i.e.
stretch goals (reflected as the 120% opportunity in the 2021
Milestones).
The 2021 target Annual Bonus opportunity for each Named Executive
Officer was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers
|
Base Salary
|
Cash Bonus
Target Value
|
Equity Bonus Target Value
|
TOTAL ANNUAL BONUS OPPORTUNITY
(% of Salary)
|
Gerald W. Shields(1)
|
$806,000 |
$700,000 |
$0 |
87% |
Jeffery P. Conklin |
$430,000 |
$175,000 |
$116,960 |
68% |
Sheryl Kinlaw(2)
|
$150,000 |
$68,000 |
$50,000 |
79% |
Robert M. Mauldin III |
$350,000 |
$142,800 |
$95,200 |
68% |
Harvey J. L. Waite |
$340,000 |
$122,400 |
$81,600 |
60% |
(1)Mr.
Shields’ Consulting Agreement did not provide for an Annual Bonus
opportunity. In September 2021, anticipating that Mr. Shields would
serve as the Company’s Interim Chief Executive Officer through at
least the end of 2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed the
compensation levels that it had discussed for a new CEO candidate,
which levels are based on the Competitive Compensation Data.
Following such review, the Compensation Committee determined that
pursuant to the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy, Mr.
Shields should have the opportunity to receive a short-term
incentive cash bonus for driving the corporate goals in 2021 (the
“STI”) and that such STI should be (a) in-line with what the
Compensation Committee had discussed for the new CEO’s short-term
cash bonus opportunity, and (b) based on the approved 2021
Milestones.
(2)Ms.
Kinlaw’s target Annual Bonus Opportunity for 2021 was pro-rated to
reflect her employment start date of July 1, 2021. The amounts
reflected in the table above are the pro-rated amounts. Ms.
Kinlaw’s Annual Bonus opportunity
was higher than the other officers (other than the CEO) in order to
bring her total compensation opportunity closer to the median of
the Competitive Compensation Data.
For Mr. Conklin, Mr. Mauldin and Mr. Waite, the Cash Bonus
constituted 60% of the target Annual Bonus opportunity and the
Equity Bonus constituted 40% of the target Annual Bonus
opportunity. The higher weighting of the Cash Bonus portion was
based on recommendation from Pearl Meyer. As discussed in the
footnote above, the Shields Consulting Agreement was amended in
September 2021 to provide a Cash Bonus opportunity of up to
$700,000. Ms. Kinlaw’s Annual Bonus opportunity was set upon her
appointment in July 2021 - her Cash Bonus constituted 58% and her
Equity Bonus constituted 42% of her Annual Bonus
opportunity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tying the Annual Bonus Opportunity to the Milestones |
As discussed above, over the last few years, the Compensation
Committee has continued to refine our executive compensation
program. In 2021, as we became a non-controlled Company for the
first time in over 30 years, the Compensation Committee
incorporated more quantifiable financial and operating metrics in
our performance objectives in order to have less discretion in
awarding the Annual Bonus to our Named Executive Officers. This
allows the Compensation Committee to tie a percentage of each Named
Executive Officer’s Annual Bonus opportunity to the milestone(s)
that such person is responsible for driving. We believe that this
step provides clear objectives to motivate the Company’s leadership
to meet high standards of values-driven leadership in addition to
delivering strong financial results.
In 2021, the Compensation Committee weighed the milestones as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers |
Milestone 1-
First Year Sales Increase |
Milestone 2-
Improved Policy Retention
|
Milestone 3-
Roadmap Execution
|
Milestone 4-
Financials & Expense Discipline
|
Individual Performance |
Gerald W. Shields |
25% |
25% |
25% |
25% |
- |
Jeffery P. Conklin |
20% |
15% |
25% |
40% |
- |
Sheryl Kinlaw
(1)
|
25% |
10% |
20% |
35% |
10% |
Robert M. Mauldin III |
40% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
- |
Harvey J. L. Waite |
25% |
20% |
35% |
20% |
- |
(1)Ms.
Kinlaw’s Annual Bonus opportunity included an individual
performance aspect in 2021 in order to incentivize her to achieve
certain legal and compliance tasks that were not reflected in the
2021 Milestones. Her future Annual Bonus opportunities will not
include individual performance percentages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Year Sales Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Achieve first year sales of $x million annualized
premium.
Targets
are established by business segment, with specific targets for
payout at 80% of goal, 100% of goal and 120% of goal for EACH of
International Life Insurance, Domestic Life Insurance and Home
Services Insurance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MILESTONE
1 |
|
|
|
Weight |
x |
80% |
= |
Payout |
|
INTERNATIONAL |
33.3% |
|
0.8 |
|
0.2664 |
|
DOMESTIC |
33.3% |
|
0.8 |
|
0.2664 |
|
HOME SERVICE |
33.3% |
|
0.8 |
|
0.2664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight |
x |
100% |
= |
Payout |
|
INTERNATIONAL |
33.3% |
|
1 |
|
0.333 |
|
DOMESTIC |
33.3% |
|
1 |
|
0.333 |
|
HOME SERVICE |
33.3% |
|
1 |
|
0.333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight |
x |
120% |
= |
Payout |
|
INTERNATIONAL |
33.3% |
|
1.2 |
|
0.3996 |
|
DOMESTIC |
33.3% |
|
1.2 |
|
0.3996 |
|
HOME SERVICE |
33.3% |
|
1.2 |
|
0.3996 |
|
The threshold amount that a Named Executive Officer could earn for
this Milestone (other than $0 for no achievement) would be 80%
achievement of
either
International, Domestic or Home Service, which would result in a
26.7% payout for Milestone 1. The maximum amount that a Named
Executive Officer could earn for this Milestone would be
achievement of 120% of all three revenue goals, which would result
in a 120% payout for Milestone 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve Policy Retention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve 1st year policy retention (Measured on 15-month
renewal).
Targets
are established by business segment with specific targets for
payout at 80% of retention goal, 100% of retention goal and 120%
retention goal for EACH of International Life Insurance and Home
Services Insurance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MILESTONE
2 |
|
|
|
Weight |
x |
80% |
= |
Payout |
|
INTERNATIONAL |
50% |
|
0.8 |
|
0.4 |
|
HOME SERVICE |
50% |
|
0.8 |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight |
x |
100% |
= |
Payout |
|
INTERNATIONAL |
50% |
|
1 |
|
0.5 |
|
HOME SERVICE |
50% |
|
1 |
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight |
x |
120% |
= |
Payout |
|
INTERNATIONAL |
50% |
|
1.2 |
|
0.6 |
|
HOME SERVICE |
50% |
|
1.2 |
|
0.6 |
|
The threshold amount that a Named Executive Officer could earn for
this Milestone (other than $0 for no achievement) would be 80%
achievement of
either
International or Home Service, which would result in a 40% payout
for Milestone 2. The maximum amount that a Named Executive Officer
could earn for this Milestone would be achievement of 120% of both
retention goals, which would result in a 120% payout for Milestone
2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roadmap Execution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintain and execute on the approved 5 Quarter
Roadmap:
•Focus
on delivering the approved roadmap to improve sales and service
across the 3 markets and 3 sales levers (Product, Promotions and
Process)
•Deliver
xx new products across International, Domestic and Home Service
markets
•Execute
on Home Services Insurance transformation plan
•Execute
on LDTI to successfully meet LDTI schedule and budget
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MILESTONE
3 |
|
|
|
Weight |
x |
80% |
= |
Payout |
|
|
100% |
|
0.8 |
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight |
x |
100% |
= |
Payout |
|
|
100% |
|
1 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight |
x |
120% |
= |
Payout |
|
|
100% |
|
1.2 |
|
1.2 |
|
The threshold amount that a Named Executive Officer could earn for
this Milestone (other than $0 for no achievement) would be 80%
achievement of roadmap execution, which would result in an 80%
payout for Milestone 3. The maximum amount that a Named Executive
Officer could earn for this Milestone would be achievement of 120%
of roadmap execution, which would result in a 120% payout for
Milestone 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financials & Expense Discipline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
•120
% Payout Stretch Goal: Positive Net Pre-tax income
•100%
Payout Goal: Break even Net Pre-tax income
•80%
Payout goal: Achieve budgeted Net Pre-tax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MILESTONE
4 |
|
|
|
Weight |
x |
80% |
= |
Payout |
|
|
100% |
|
0.8 |
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight |
x |
100% |
= |
Payout |
|
|
100% |
|
1 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight |
x |
120% |
= |
Payout |
|
|
100% |
|
1.2 |
|
1.2 |
|
The threshold amount that a Named Executive Officer could earn for
this Milestone (other than $0 for no achievement) would be 80%
achievement of financials & expense discipline, which would
result in an 80% payout for Milestone 4. The maximum amount that a
Named Executive Officer could earn for this Milestone would be
achievement of 120% of financials & expense discipline, which
would result in a 120% payout for Milestone 4.
|
Thus, the overall Annual Bonus opportunity for each named Executive
Officer is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold Achievement of each Milestone(1)
|
Target
(100% Achievement of each Milestone)
|
120% Achievement of each Milestone |
Gerald W. Shields |
$396,725 |
$700,000 |
$840,000 |
Jeffery P. Conklin |
$184,928 |
$291,960 |
$350,352 |
Sheryl Kinlaw
(2)
|
$64,517 |
$118,000 |
$139,240 |
Robert M. Mauldin III |
$120,618 |
$238,000 |
$285,600 |
Harvey J. L. Waite |
$119,697 |
$204,000 |
$244,800 |
(1)Calculated
for each Named Executive Officer by multiplying the weighting for
each Milestone by the threshold achievement percentage needed for a
payout, as set forth above, then adding all 4 factors, which would
result in the following percentages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers |
Threshold Achievement Multiplier* |
Gerald W. Shields |
56.7% |
Jeffery P. Conklin |
63.3% |
Sheryl Kinlaw |
54.7% |
Robert M. Mauldin III |
50.7% |
Harvey J. L. Waite |
58.7% |
* Rounded to nearest tenth of a percent.
(2)Threshold
achievement for Ms. Kinlaw assumes $0 payout on personal goal; 120%
achievement of each Milestone assumes a 100% payout on personal
goal.
Calculating the 2021 Annual Bonus
Because the calculation of the Annual Bonus opportunity is
formulaic, following conclusion of the 2021 fiscal year, the
Compensation Committee only had to determine the achievement of
each of the 2021 Milestones in order to calculate the 2021 Annual
Bonus amount for each Named Executive Officer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 Milestone |
Percentage of Milestone Achieved |
2021 Key Accomplishments/Results |
First Year Sales Growth |
26.7% |
•Achieved
80% of first year sales growth for international sales
•Did
not achieve first year sales growth for domestic life insurance
sales or Home Services Insurance segment sales
|
Retention Improvement |
120% |
•Achieved
stretch retention goals for both international life insurance and
Home Services Insurance segment
|
Roadmap Execution |
120% |
•Delivered
above plan on 5-quarter roadmap, which included deliveries
of:
◦New
and enhanced products
◦Quarterly
portal releases and numerous infrastructure and service-related
projects
•LDTI
project implementation met timeline
•Home
Services Insurance transformation continued on plan
|
Financial and Expense Discipline |
80% |
•Achieved
budgeted and Plan Net Pre-tax income
|
Once the achievement percentages are set for each milestone, the
Annual Bonus was calculated for each Named Executive Officer by
multiplying the percentage achieved for each milestone by such
Named Executive Officer’s weighting for each such milestone to
determine the
bonus multiplier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named
Executive Officer |
First Year Sales Growth |
= |
Retention Improve-ment |
= |
Roadmap Execution |
= |
Financial & Expense Discipline |
= |
Personal Goal |
TOTAL |
Gerald W. Shields |
.25 x .267 |
.067 |
.25 x 1.2 |
.3 |
.25 x 1.2 |
.3 |
.25 x .80 |
.2 |
- |
.867 |
Jeffery P. Conklin |
.20 x .267 |
.053 |
.15 x 1.2 |
.18 |
.25 x 1.2 |
.3 |
.40 x .80 |
.32 |
- |
.853 |
Sheryl Kinlaw |
.25 x .267 |
.067 |
.10 x 1.2 |
.12 |
.2 x 1.2 |
.24 |
.35 x .80 |
.28 |
.1 |
.807 |
Robert M. Mauldin III
(1)
|
.40 x .467 |
.187 |
.20 x 1.2 |
.24 |
.20 x 1.2 |
.24 |
.20 x .80 |
.16 |
- |
.827 |
Harvey J. L. Waite |
.25 x .267 |
.067 |
.20 x 1.2 |
.24 |
.35 x 1.2 |
.42 |
.20 x .80 |
.16 |
- |
.887 |
(1)Robert
Mauldin was given 60% payout on the Home Services’ first year sales
increase target. The Home Services sales team missed the 80% payout
by less than $100,000. The Compensation Committee gave dispensation
for the hurricane that impacted the Home Services sales by
approximately $200,000, thus the Compensation Committee and Board
approved 60% credit to the Mr. Mauldin and two sales
leaders.
The total (bonus multiplier) is then multiplied by each Named
Executive Officer’s target Annual Bonus opportunity to determine
the Annual Bonus earned. The Cash Bonus amounts paid to the Named
Executive Officers are reported under “Non-equity Incentive Plan
Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table on page
46.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers
|
Cash Bonus Target Value
|
x |
Cash Bonus Paid
|
Equity Bonus Target Value
|
x |
Equity Bonus Granted
|
Gerald W. Shields |
$700,000 |
.867 |
$606,667 |
0 |
|
0 |
Jeffery P. Conklin |
$175,000 |
.853 |
$149,334 |
$116,960 |
.853 |
$99,806 |
Sheryl Kinlaw |
$68,000 |
.807 |
$54,853 |
$50,000 |
.807 |
$40,333 |
Robert M. Mauldin III |
$142,800 |
.827 |
$118,048 |
$95,200 |
.827 |
$78,669 |
Harvey J. L. Waite |
$122,400 |
.887 |
$108,528 |
$81,600 |
.887 |
$72,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
$1,208,200 |
|
$1,037,430 |
$343,760 |
|
$291,161 |
The Equity Bonus is calculated by dividing the Equity Bonus Granted
amount set forth in the table above by the closing price of our
Class A common stock on March 31, 2022, the payout date for the
Annual Bonus. The Equity Bonus was paid in the form of a grant of
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs), which vest over a 3-year period
following the date of payment. Thus, our Equity Bonus component has
both a performance-based component, i.e., the RSUs aren’t granted
unless the established milestones are achieved, and a time-based
component, i.e., once the performance goals are achieved, a Named
Executive Officer receives the stock over the following three
years, subject to continued service with the Company. We believe
this component of pay thus aligns the interests of our executives
with shareholders’ interests in creating long-term shareholder
value and promoting the stability and retention of the executive
team over longer periods.
OTHER COMPENSATION PRACTICES POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
Inducement Equity Grants
In order to attract and retain talent, from time-to-time we offer
inducement equity awards that vest over 3-year terms. We believe
that such awards allow us to recruit talent and incentivize
employees to remain at Citizens in order to help drive our
strategic goals. In 2021, we granted Ms. Kinlaw an inducement
equity grant of 24,000 RSUs.
Compensation Clawback
The terms of all outstanding RSU awards held by our Named Executive
Officers allow us to recoup “excess compensation” that may be paid
in respect of RSUs in the event the Company is required to restate
its audited financial statements for any of the prior three fiscal
years as a result of material noncompliance with financial
reporting requirements under federal securities laws. “Excess
compensation” means the excess of (i) the actual
amount of performance-based compensation received by an individual
over (ii) the compensation that would have been received based on
the restated financial results during such period.
Prohibition on Hedging, Pledging and Short Sales
The Company prohibits all directors and officers from engaging in
(i) any transactions in derivatives of the Company’s securities,
including the use of financial instruments such as prepaid variable
forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds, or
any other transactions that hedge or offset, or are designed to
hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of the Company’s
securities, (ii) pledging of the Company securities as collateral
and (iii) short sales of the Company’s securities.
Other Benefits
Our Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in other
benefits on the same basis as other employees, including our
health, dental and vision insurance plans, our 401(k) Retirement
Plan and paid time off plan. Additionally, Robert Mauldin and
Harvey Waite live outside of Texas and while Mr. Shields was
serving as Interim Chief Executive Officer in 2021, his primary
residence was not in Austin, Texas. We reimbursed these executives
for travel expenses incurred in commuting between their principal
residence and our executive offices, as well as lodging
expenses.
Pursuant to the Shields Consulting Agreement, Mr. Shields received
perquisites in the amount of $18,176, which primarily consisted of
travel and lodging from his home to the Company’s headquarters in
Austin, Texas. No perquisites or personal benefits exceeded $10,000
for any of our other Named Executive Officers.
Risk Considerations
In establishing and reviewing the Company’s executive compensation
program, the Compensation Committee considers whether the program
encourages unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. Additional risk
considerations are discussed above under “Board Matters – Board’s
Roles and Responsibilities - Risk Oversight.”
Severance Arrangements
As previously disclosed, throughout 2021, the Company’s Board
engaged in a search for a permanent chief executive officer. In
order to assure the retention and continued attention to their
duties and responsibilities during a potential change in the
Company’s leadership, in November 2021, the Company entered into
Executive Change in Leadership Agreement with each of Mr. Conklin,
Ms. Kinlaw, Mr. Mauldin and Mr. Waite (each, a “Change in
Leadership Agreement”). Each Change in Leadership Agreement
provided for cash severance and other benefits in connection with a
qualifying termination following (i) a Change in Leadership, which
is defined as the “replacement of the interim CEO, Gerald W.
Shields, with the New CEO”, or (ii) a “Change of
Control”.
Potential payments and benefits provided pursuant to the Change in
Leadership Agreements and a more detailed description of the
agreements are set forth below in the section entitled “Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” beginning on
page
50.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company did not have any other
severance arrangements in place with any of its executive
officers.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and
discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by
Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on
such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended
to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be
included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by
reference
in the Company’s 2021 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
which the Board approved unanimously.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Dr. Robert B. Sloan, Jr. (Chairman)
Christopher W. Claus
Jerry D. Davis, Jr.
COMPENSATION TABLES
The following tables, footnotes and narrative discuss the
compensation of each of our Named Executive Officers for 2021, 2020
and 2019, as applicable.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
(1)
|
Bonus
($)
(2)
|
Stock Awards
($)
(3)
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)
(4)
|
All Other Compensation ($)
|
|
Total
($)
|
Gerald W. Shields |
2021 |
822,945 |
— |
10,499 |
606,667 |
18,176 |
(5)
|
1,458,287
|
Chief
Executive
Officer and President
|
2020 |
295,600 |
125,000 |
9,450 |
— |
75,625 |
(5)
|
505,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffery P. Conklin |
2021 |
430,000 |
— |
214,460 |
149,334 |
10,012 |
(6)
|
803,806 |
Vice
President, Chief
Financial Officer,
Chief Investment
Officer and Treasurer
|
2020 |
430,000 |
— |
322,499 |
214,463 |
10,317 |
(6)
|
977,279 |
2019 |
364,775 |
— |
187,502 |
140,000 |
8,258 |
|
700,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheryl Kinlaw |
2021 |
150,000 |
— |
130,320 |
54,853 |
115,485 |
(6)(7)
|
450,658 |
Vice
President, Chief
Legal Officer and
Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Mauldin III |
2021 |
350,000 |
— |
205,670 |
118,048 |
7,761 |
(6)
|
681,479 |
Vice President, Chief
Marketing Officer
|
2020 |
350,000 |
— |
262,498 |
164,850 |
8,636 |
(6)
|
785,984 |
|
2019 |
308,000 |
— |
230,000 |
138,600 |
6,634 |
|
683,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harvey J. L. Waite |
2021 |
340,000 |
— |
48,963 |
108,528 |
10,458 |
(6)
|
507,949 |
Vice
President, Chief
Actuary
|
2020 |
255,000 |
— |
— |
48,960 |
72,458 |
(6)(8)
|
376,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)The
2021 and 2020 salary for Mr. Shields reflects the consulting fees
paid to him under the terms of the Consulting Agreement for his
service as Interim Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company (as an independent contractor and not an employee). Mr.
Shields was appointed Interim Chief Executive Officer and President
effective August 5, 2020 and held that position through December
31, 2021.
The 2021 salary for Ms. Kinlaw reflects the prorated salary based
on her 6 months of service in the role of Vice President, Chief
Legal Officer and Secretary of the Company effective July 1,
2021.
The 2020 salary for Mr. Waite reflects the prorated salary based on
his 9 months of service in the role of Vice President, Chief
Actuary of the Company effective April 1, 2020.
(2)The
2020 bonus amount for Mr. Shields reflects bonus awarded to Mr.
Shields in 2021 to compensate him for the leadership he provided to
the Company in 2020 and thus we consider it “earned” during 2020.
For more information about the bonus, see the section entitled
“Shields Consulting Agreement” on page
48.
(3)The
amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of awards of
RSUs granted under the Citizens, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan and do
not reflect compensation actually received. The granted RSUs have
3-year vesting terms, subject to acceleration under certain
circumstances as described herein. The grant date fair value is
computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718 and is measured based on
the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock on the date
of grant. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are
included in Footnote 11 to the Company’s audited financial
statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, included in
the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The 2021 RSU awards granted to Mr. Conklin, Mr. Mauldin and Mr.
Waite represent incentive plan RSUs granted on January 29, 2021 for
achievement of 2020 performance goals.
The RSUs granted to Ms. Kinlaw represent an inducement grant made
to Ms. Kinlaw on her employment start date. All of the RSUs vest
equally over 3-years from the date of grant.
The Shields Consulting Agreement did not provide for any equity
incentive compensation. The RSUs reflected in the table represent
time-based RSUs granted to him in both 2021 and 2020 for his
service as a non-employee director.
(4)The
amounts reflect the performance-based cash incentive bonus earned
by each Named Executive Officer in each year in recognition of
achievement of the relevant performance goals achieved for the
prior fiscal year. In January 2022 the Compensation Committee
recommended and in March 2022, the Board approved, the non-equity
incentive plan compensation set forth above for each Named
Executive Officer for achievement of the 2021 Milestones. See
“Annual Bonus Opportunity” starting on page
38
for additional discussion on achievement and payout of the 2021
Milestones.
(5)2021
– This amount reflects perquisites paid to Mr. Shields under the
Shields Consulting Agreement, which primarily consisted of travel
and lodging from his home to the Company’s headquarters in Austin,
Texas.
2020 - This amount represents director compensation fees received
by Mr. Shields in his capacity as non-employee director prior to
his appointment as Interim Chief Executive Officer and President
effective August 5, 2020.
(6)This
amount represents the Company’s contributions to the respective
Named Executive Officer’s defined contribution plan.
(7)Includes
the amount paid to Ms. Kinlaw as outside counsel prior to April 1,
2021 and as Interim Chief Legal Officer (as a consultant) from
April 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021.
(8)Includes
consulting fees earned by Mr. Waite, in accordance with the terms
of his Consulting Agreement with the Company from January 1, 2020
to March 31, 2020.
The amounts in the salary, bonus, and non-equity incentive plan
compensation columns of the “Summary Compensation Table – 2021,
2020, and 2019” reflect actual amounts earned in the relevant years
(even if paid in a subsequent year), while the amounts in the stock
awards column reflect the fair market values of equity granted
during the year and not actual amounts paid. The tables entitled
“Outstanding Equity Awards at 2021 Year-End” and “Stock Vested –
2021” provide further information on the Named Executive Officers’
potential realizable value and actual value realized with respect
to their RSU awards. The “Summary Compensation Table – 2021, 2020,
and 2019” should be read in conjunction with the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis and the subsequent tables and narrative
descriptions.
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
The following table shows information regarding plan-based awards
granted to the Named Executive Officers in 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
(1)
|
Estimated Future
Payouts
Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(1)
|
All Other
Stock
Awards: Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
|
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock
Awards
($)
(2)
|
Name
|
Award Type
|
Grant
Date
|
Threshold
($)
|
Target
($)
|
Maximum
($)
|
Threshold
(#)
|
Target
(#)
|
Maximum
(#)
|
Gerald W. Shields
(3)
|
Cash Incentive
|
|
396,725 |
|
700,000 |
|
840,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
Time-Based RSUs
|
6/2/2021
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
2,023 |
|
10,499 |
|
Jeffery P. Conklin
|
Cash Incentive
(4)
|
|
110,845 |
|
175,000 |
|
210,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
Performance-Based RSUs
(5)
|
3/9/2021
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
74,083 |
|
116,960 |
|
140,352 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Sheryl Kinlaw
|
Cash Incentive
(4)
|
|
37,179 |
|
68,000 |
|
80,240 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
Inducement Grant RSUs
(6)
|
7/1/2021
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
24,000 |
|
130,320 |
|
|
Performance-Based RSUs
(5)
|
7/1/2021
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
27,338 |
|
50,000 |
|
59,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Robert M. Mauldin III
|
Cash Incentive
(4)
|
|
72,371 |
|
142,800 |
|
171,360 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
Performance-Based RSUs
(5)
|
3/9/2021
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
48,247 |
|
95,200 |
|
114,240 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Harvey J. L. Waite
|
Cash Incentive
(4)
|
|
71,818 |
|
122,400 |
|
146,880 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
Performance-Based RSUs
(5)
|
3/9/2021
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
47,879 |
|
81,600 |
|
97,920 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(1)The
threshold value represents achievement of at least 80% of each 2021
Milestone, the target amount represents achievement of 100% of each
2021 Milestone and the maximum value represents the achievement of
120% or greater of each 2021 Milestone. Ms. Kinlaw’s threshold,
target and maximum are pro-rated to reflect her July 1, 2021 start
date.
(2)The
grant date fair value of awards of time-based RSUs is calculated in
accordance with ASC Topic 718 based on the closing price of the
Company’s Class A common stock on the date of grant. Assumptions
used in the calculation
of these amounts are included in Footnote 11 to the Company’s
audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2021, included in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
(3)The
Shields Consulting Agreement did not provide for equity incentive
plan awards. Mr. Shields’ time-based RSU grant represents an annual
director award of RSUs granted to Mr. Shields on June 2, 2021. The
terms of his annual director award are discussed above in “Director
Compensation” starting on page
24.
(4)Represents
the cash portion of the Annual Bonus opportunity based on
achievement of the 2021 Milestones. The material terms of the
Annual Bonus opportunity are discussed in “Annual Bonus
Opportunity” starting on page
38.
(5)Represents
the equity portion of the Annual Bonus opportunity based on
achievement of the 2021 Milestones. The awards are RSUs that are
granted based upon achievement of milestones and once received by a
Named Executive Officer, subject to three-year vesting terms. The
material terms of the Annual Bonus opportunity are discussed in
“Annual Bonus Opportunity” starting on page
38.
The Grant Date is the date that the Annual Bonus opportunity was
approved by the Board of Directors, except in the case of Ms.
Kinlaw, whose Grant Date was her employment start
date.
(6)Represents
an equity inducement grant awarded to Ms. Kinlaw on her start date.
The award is a grant of RSUs that are subject to three-year vesting
terms.
Shields Consulting Agreement
In connection with his appointment as Interim Chief Executive
Officer and President, the Company entered into a Consulting
Agreement with Gerald W. Shields effective August 5, 2020 (as
amended, the “Shields Consulting Agreement”). Under the Shields
Consulting Agreement, Mr. Shields served as Interim Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Company.
2020 Compensation
– In 2020, Mr. Shields received a consulting fee of $14,500 per
week (representing an annualized consulting fee of $754,000)
(“Initial Consulting Fee”). The Board and Compensation Committee
considered market data provided by Pearl Meyer when setting the
Initial Consulting Fee. Additionally, in March 2021, the
Compensation Committee and the Board approved a bonus of $125,000,
which was paid to Mr. Shields on March 23, 2021, to compensate Mr.
Shields for the leadership that he provided to the Company in 2020,
while navigating through significant internal and external
disruptions, uncertainties and challenges including a change in
control, change in leadership, litigation and a global pandemic.
Such bonus was also intended to compensate Mr. Shields for his loss
of board fees.
2021 Compensation
– Effective January 1, 2021, the Board and Compensation Committee
authorized an increase in the Initial Consulting Fee to $15,500 per
week (representing an annualized consulting fee of $806,000). In
September 2021, in recognition that Mr. Shields would lead the
Company for most, if not all of 2021, the Board approved the
addition of a short-term incentive bonus opportunity for Mr.
Shields of up to $700,000. The earn-out of the bonus opportunity
was based on the 2021 Milestones approved by the Board for the
Named Executive Officers.
Pursuant to the Shields Consulting Agreement, Mr. Shields was also
entitled to reimbursement of reasonable and necessary expenses for
travel incurred, both from his home (located greater than 100 miles
from Austin, Texas), and business expenses.
The foregoing summary of the Shields Consulting Agreement is not
complete and is subject to, and qualified by reference to, (i) the
full text of the Shields Consulting Agreement filed as
Exhibit 10.1
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
August 11, 2020, (ii) the Amendment to the Shields Consulting
Agreement filed as
Exhibit 10.9
to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on
March 10, 2021, and (iii) Amendment No. 2 to the Shields Consulting
Agreement filed as
Exhibit 10.1
to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC
on November 4, 2021.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2021 YEAR-END
The following table shows information regarding the outstanding RSU
awards held by each of the Named Executive Officers as of December
31, 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Grant Date
|
Number of
Shares
or Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
(#)
|
Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested
(1)
($)
|
Gerald W. Shields
|
6/2/2021
|
2,023
(2)
|
10,742 |
|
Jeffery P. Conklin
|
4/15/2020
|
29,054
(3)
|
154,277 |
|
1/29/2021
|
35,448
(4)
|
188,229 |
|
Sheryl Kinlaw
|
7/1/2021
|
24,000
(5)
|
127,440 |
|
Robert M. Mauldin III
|
4/15/2020
|
23,649
(3)
|
125,574 |
|
1/29/2021
|
33,995
(4)
|
180,513 |
|
Harvey J. L. Waite
|
1/29/2021
|
8,093
(4)
|
42,974 |
|
(1)The
dollar amounts are determined by multiplying the number of RSUs by
$5.31, the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock on
December 31, 2021, the last trading day of the Company’s fiscal
year.
(2)All
of the RSUs are scheduled to vest on June 2, 2022 (the first
anniversary of the date of the grant), provided that Mr. Shields
continues to serve as a director through the vesting
date.
(3)All
of these RSUs vested on April 15, 2022 (the second anniversary of
the date of the grant).
(4)One-third
of the RSUs vested subsequent to December 31, 2021, on January 29,
2022 (the first anniversary of the date of the grant). One-third of
the RSUs are scheduled to vest on January 29, 2023 (the second
anniversary of the date of the grant) and the remaining one-third
are scheduled to vest on January 29, 2024 (the third anniversary of
the date of grant), provided that the Named Executive Officer
continues to be employed with the Company through the vesting
date.
(5)Represents
equity inducement grant awarded to Ms. Kinlaw on her start
date.
STOCK VESTED
The following table shows information regarding the vesting of RSUs
during 2021 that were granted to the Named Executive Officers prior
to 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)
|
Value Realized on Vesting ($)(1)
|
Gerald W. Shields
|
1,575
|
8,174
|
Jeffery P. Conklin
|
42,277
|
249,384
|
Sheryl Kinlaw
|
–
|
–
|
Robert M. Mauldin III
|
39,849
|
235,881
|
Harvey J. L. Waite
|
–
|
–
|
(1)The
dollar amounts are determined by multiplying the number of shares
that vested by the per share closing price of the Company’s Class A
common stock on the vesting date.
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN
CONTROL
At December 31, 2021, the following agreements contain provisions
whereby a Named Executive Officer may receive a payment following
termination of employment or a change in control of the
Company:
•RSU
Agreements
•Executive
Change in Leadership Agreements
RSU Agreements
Pursuant to the terms of the award agreements for RSUs granted to
all recipients under our Omnibus Incentive Plan, certain unvested
RSUs shall become vested on an accelerated basis in the following
circumstances:
(a)death
or Disability (as Disability is defined in §22(e)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code);
(b)Termination
of employment without Cause; or
(c)Change
in Control
(a)
Death or Disability
– 100% vested
(b)
Termination of employment without Cause
– pro-rata vesting occurs calculated by reference to the numbers of
completed months of employment or service from the most recent
vesting date (or grant date, as the case may be) as a fraction of
the number of months that make up the period from the most recent
vesting date (or grant date, as the case may be) through the next
vesting date.
“Cause” means:
•a
material breach of any agreement to which the recipient and the
Company are parties;
•any
act (other than retirement) or omission to act, including without
limitation, the commission of any crime (other than ordinary
traffic violations) that may have a material and adverse effect on
the business of the Company or on the recipient’s ability to
perform services for the Company; or
•any
material misconduct or neglect of duties in connection with the
business or affairs of the Company.
(c)
Change in Control
– 100% vested if “Termination of Employment or Service in
Connection with a Change of Control”
“Termination of Employment or Service in Connection with a Change
of Control” means a termination of employment within the one-year
period beginning on the date of a Change in Control:
•by
the Company for any reason other than Cause; or
•by
the recipient for Good Reason
“Good Reason” generally means a material reduction in base salary
or wage rate or target incentive opportunity; or the relocation of
the principal place of employment to a location more than fifty
miles from the Named Executive Officer’s principal place of
employment as of immediately prior to the Change of Control
(subject to certain cure rights).
A “Change of Control” generally occurs when:
•we
sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our
assets;
•we
consummate a merger or consolidation of the Company with or into
another corporation where our shareholders do not continue to hold
at least a majority of the surviving entity;
•any
person, entity or group (other than the Company) becomes a
beneficial owner of, or shall have obtained voting control over,
more than a certain percentage of the outstanding shares of the
Class A common stock
•under
certain circumstances, our directors cease to constitute a majority
of the Board; or
•
our shareholders approve a plan of complete liquidation or
dissolution of the Company.
The following table shows the amounts that each of the Named
Executive Officers would have become entitled to under the terms of
their RSU grant agreements had their employment or service been
terminated on December 31, 2021. These benefits would not be
duplicative of any payments made pursuant to the Change in
Leadership Agreements described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death or Disability
($)
(1)
|
Termination without Cause
($)
(1)
|
Termination of Employment or Service in Connection with a Change of
Control
($)
(1)
|
Gerald W. Shields |
10,742
|
6,266
|
10,742
|
Jeffery P. Conklin |
342,506
|
275,394
|
342,506
|
Sheryl Kinlaw |
127,440
|
63,720
|
127,440
|
Robert M. Mauldin III |
306,087
|
249,186
|
306,087
|
Harvey J. L. Waite |
42,974
|
39,393
|
42,974
|
(1)
The dollar amounts are determined by multiplying the number of
shares subject to the accelerated RSUs by $5.31, the closing price
of the Company’s Class A common stock on December 31,
2021.
The foregoing summary is not complete and is subject to, and
qualified by reference to, the full text of the Form of Citizens,
Inc. Employee Restricted Stock Unit Agreement filed as
Exhibit 10.6
to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on
March 29, 2018.
Executive Change in Leadership Agreements
On November 3, 2021, the Company entered into an Executive Change
in Leadership Agreement (the “Change in Leadership Agreement”) with
each of its Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Shields). The
Compensation Committee and the Board determined that the Change in
Leadership Agreement would, among other things, help preserve
leadership continuity in light of the Company’s search for a
permanent Chief Executive Officer.
Pursuant to the Change in Leadership Agreements, a Named Executive
Officer would become entitled to a payment if, within one year of
November 3, 2021:
(a)There
is a Change in Leadership or a Change of Control;
AND
(b)The
Named Executive Officer is terminated without Cause within one year
of the Change in Leadership or Change of Control.
“Change in Leadership” means the replacement of Gerald W. Shields
with a new Chief Executive Officer.
“Change of Control” generally has the same meaning as described
above.
Under such circumstances, a Named Executive Officer would be
entitled to:
•6
months base salary
•A
pro-rata portion of the target Annual Bonus opportunity for the
year in which the Named Executive Officer is terminated, plus, if
the termination occurs before a bonus is paid for a prior fiscal
year (e.g., terminated in January of a calendar year), the Named
Executive Officer shall receive 100% of the target bonus for such
prior year if he or she has not already been paid as of the date of
termination;
•reimbursement
of six (6) months of COBRA continuation payments; and
•vesting
of all outstanding RSUs
(collectively, the “Termination Payment”).
The following table shows the estimated Termination Payment each
Named Executive Officer (other than Mr. Shields) would have become
entitled to under the terms of the Change in Leadership Agreement
had there been a Change in Leadership or Change of Control and his
or her employment had been terminated without Cause on December 31,
2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits |
Jeffery P. Conklin |
Sheryl Kinlaw |
Robert M. Mauldin III |
Harvey J. L. Waite |
6-months COBRA ($) |
$7,382
|
$0
|
$11,833
|
$11,833
|
6-month base salary ($) |
215,000
|
150,000
|
175,000
|
170,000
|
Pro-rata (365 / 365) payout of target bonus |
291,960
|
118,000
|
238,000
|
204,000
|
Acceleration of Vesting of RSUs ($)
(1)
|
342,506
|
127,440
|
306,087
|
42,974
|
Total ($) |
$856,848
|
$395,440 |
$730,920 |
$428,807 |
(1)The
dollar amounts are determined by multiplying the number of shares
subject to the accelerated RSUs by $5.31, the closing price of the
Company’s Class A common stock on December 31, 2021.
(2)Ms.
Kinlaw did not participate in the Company's health plan in 2021 and
thus no COBRA benefits would have been paid.
The foregoing summary of the Change in Leadership Agreements is not
complete and is subject to, and qualified by reference to, the full
text of the Change in Leadership Agreement filed as
Exhibit 10.2
to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC
on November 4, 2021.
CEO PAY RATIO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Consulting Fee
($)
|
Stock Awards
($)
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
|
All Other Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Gerald W. Shields |
822,945 |
10,499 |
606,667
|
18,176(5)
|
1,458,287
|
CEO Pay Ratio:
approximately 24 to 1
The total annual compensation of Mr. Shields for 2021 ($1,458,287)
was 24 times the median annual total compensation of all of our
employees ($60,036).
Calculation of Mr. Shields total annual
compensation:
As disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table of this Proxy
Statement on page
46,
Mr. Shields had annual total compensation of $1,458,287 in
2021.
Calculation of median annual total compensation of all our
employees:
We identified our median employee by examining the total cash
compensation for all of the 215 employees who were employed by us
on December 31, 2021. Mr. Shields was not an employee as of such
date.
We believe the use of total cash compensation for all employees is
a consistently applied compensation measure that reasonably
reflects the annual compensation of our employees. We included all
employees, whether employed on a full-time or part-time basis and
did not exclude any non-U.S. employees. We did not make any
assumptions, adjustments or estimates with respect to total cash
compensation (except for the fact that we annualized the
compensation for any full-time or part-time employees who were not
employed by us for all of 2021).
STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table provides information as of April 12, 2022,
on the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock by (1) each
of our directors and nominees, (2) each of the other named
executive officers and (3) all of our directors and executive
officers as a group.
Each person listed below has sole voting and investment power for
all shares held by such person.
The address for each person listed below is: Citizens, Inc., 11815
Alterra Parkway, Suite 1500, Austin, Texas 78758.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER
|
CLASS A SHARES OWNED
|
PERCENT OF
CLASS
(1)
|
Directors and Nominees |
|
|
Christopher W. Claus |
13,911 |
*
|
Cynthia H. Davis |
0 |
*
|
Jerry D. Davis, Jr. |
4,591 |
*
|
Dr. E. Dean Gage
|
6,370 |
*
|
Francis A. Keating II |
4,591 |
*
|
Dr. Terry S. Maness |
4,591 |
*
|
J. Keith Morgan |
0 |
*
|
Gerald W. Shields |
16,470 |
*
|
Dr. Robert B. Sloan, Jr. |
43,662 |
*
|
Mary Taylor |
0 |
*
|
Other Named Executive Officers |
Jeffery P. Conklin |
56,130 |
*
|
Sheryl Kinlaw |
1,280 |
*
|
Robert M. Mauldin III |
46,851 |
*
|
Harvey J. L. Waite |
3,906 |
*
|
Directors and executive officers as a group |
(14 individuals) |
202,353 |
*
|
* Less
than one percent (1%).
(1)Based
on 50,428,935 shares of Class A common stock outstanding as of
April 12, 2022.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Except as otherwise noted, the following table provides information
as of April 12, 2022, with respect to the number of shares of
our Class A common stock owned by each person known by the Company
to be the beneficial owner of more than 5 percent of our Class A
common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER
|
CLASS A SHARES OWNED |
PERCENT OF
CLASS
(1)
|
Galindo, Arias & Lopez (as trustee of four non-U.S. trusts
and/or record holder)
c/o Gala Trust and Management Services, Inc., Scotia Plaza, 9th
Floor, Federico Boyd Avenue 18 and 51 Street, Panama 5, Republic of
Panama
|
4,121,765 |
8.2%
(2)
|
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd
Street
New York, NY 10055
|
3,462,158 |
6.9%
(3)
|
(1)Based
on 50,428,935 shares of Class A common stock outstanding as of
April 12, 2022. The ownership percentages set forth in this
column are based on the assumption that each of the beneficial
owners continued to own the number of shares reflected in the table
above on such date.
(2)The
information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Galindo, Arias
& Lopez (“GA&L”), Gala Trust and Management Services, Inc.
(“Gala Management”) and GAMASE Insureds Trust (“Gamase,” and
together with GA&L and Gala Management, the “GALA”) with the
SEC on February 4, 2019, reporting beneficial ownership as of
December 31, 2018. GALA has not filed a Schedule 13G/A with the SEC
regarding ownership of the Company’s stock since such date. As of
such date, the reporting persons reported that GA&L has shared
dispositive power with respect to 4,121,765 shares of Class A
common stock, Gala Management has shared dispositive power with
respect to 2,787,731 shares of Class A common stock and Gamase has
shared dispositive power with respect to 2,526,980 shares of Class
A common stock.
To our knowledge, GA&L is the sole owner of Gala Management and
Regal Trust (BVI) Ltd. (“Regal”), who serves as trustee for trusts
that hold shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. Gala
Management serves as trustee of Gamase, which holds 2,526,980
shares, and as trustee of an additional trust that holds 260,751
shares of our Class A common stock, making Gala Management the
indirect beneficial owner of 2,787,731 shares. Regal serves as
trustee of two trusts, one of which holds 1,101,321 shares of Class
A common stock and the other of which holds 232,713 shares, making
Regal the indirect beneficial owner of 1,334,034 shares. As sole
owner of Gala Management and Regal, GA&L is deemed to
beneficially own all shares beneficially owned by them, or a total
of 4,121,765 shares of the Company’s outstanding Class A common
stock.
(3)The
information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc.
with the SEC on February 1, 2022, reporting beneficial ownership as
of December 31, 2021. BlackRock, Inc. reported with respect to our
Class A common stock: sole voting power - 3,397,603 shares; sole
dispositive power - 3,462,158 shares; no shared voting or
dispositive power.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
ANNUAL MEETING
The Annual Meeting will be held at the Company’s principal
executive office at 11815 Alterra Parkway, Suite 1500, Austin,
Texas 78758 on Tuesday, June 7, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. Central
Daylight Time.
ATTENDING THE ANNUAL MEETING
If you plan on attending the Annual Meeting in person, you will be
required to present a valid, government-issued photo identification
(e.g., driver’s license or passport) to enter the Annual Meeting.
If you are a shareholder of record, your ownership of Common Stock
will be verified against the list of shareholders of record as of
the Record Date prior to being allowed to enter the Annual Meeting.
If you are a beneficial owner and hold your shares of Common Stock
in “street name” (i.e., your shares of Common Stock are held in a
brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee), you will need to
provide evidence of beneficial ownership as of the Record Date,
such as an account statement or letter from the shareholder of
record (i.e., your broker, bank or other nominee), and a copy of
the voting instruction form provided by the shareholder of
record.
Seating at the Annual Meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (Central
Daylight Time) on June 7, 2022. The health and safety of our
shareholders and other participants at the Annual Meeting is of the
utmost importance. In light of public health concerns related to
the coronavirus (COVID-19), we intend to institute safety
precautions at the Annual Meeting consistent with applicable
guidelines of public health authorities, which will include
appropriate social distancing and may include seating shareholders
in a separate room from the presenters, with full opportunity to
hear the presenters, vote and participate in any discussion, and
may take other actions as necessary to protect all attendees from
undue risk of exposure to the virus. We suggest arriving at least
30 minutes early to the Annual Meeting to allow sufficient time to
complete the admission process. Cameras, recording devices and
other electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual
Meeting. Admission will close ten minutes before the Annual Meeting
begins. If you do not provide a valid, government-issued photo
identification or do not comply with the other procedures described
above, you will not be admitted to the Annual Meeting. The Company
reserves the right to remove from the Annual Meeting persons who
disrupt the Annual Meeting or who do not comply with the rules and
procedures for the conduct of the Annual Meeting.
PROXY MATERIALS
The proxy materials for the Annual Meeting include the Notice of
Annual Meeting, this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form
10-K. If you received a paper copy of these materials, the proxy
materials also include a proxy card or voting instruction
form.
NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
We are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily via
“Notice and Access” delivery pursuant to SEC rules. On or about
April 25, 2022, we mailed to our shareholders (other than
those who previously requested a printed set) a “Notice Regarding
the Availability of Proxy Materials” (the “notice”) containing
instructions on how to access the proxy materials via the Internet.
Utilizing this method of proxy delivery expedites receipt of proxy
materials by our shareholders and reduces our cost of producing and
mailing the full set of proxy materials. If you receive a notice by
mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in
the mail. Instead, the notice instructs you on how to access the
proxy materials and vote over the Internet. If you received a
notice by mail and would like to receive paper copies of our proxy
materials in the mail, you may follow the instructions in the
notice for making this request. The notice also contains
instructions on how you may request to receive an electronic copy
of our proxy materials by e-mail.
Our proxy materials are also available on our website at
www.citizensinc.com. If you vote by Internet, simply go to
www.envisionreports.com/cia and follow the prompts regarding
electronic distribution consent on that site.
PROXY SOLICITATION
We bear all expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation
of proxies. We have engaged Alliance Advisors, LLC to assist with
the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $10,000, plus expenses.
Our directors, officers and employees also may solicit proxies by
mail, telephone and personal contact. They will not receive any
additional compensation for these activities. We will reimburse
banking institutions, brokerage firms, custodians, nominees and
fiduciaries for their costs in forwarding proxy materials to
beneficial owners of our Class A common stock.
VOTING
Each share of the Company’s Class A common stock may cast one vote
on each matter. Only shareholders of record at the close of
business on April 12, 2022 are entitled to vote at the Annual
Meeting. As of the Record Date, we had 50,428,935 shares of Class A
common stock outstanding and entitled to vote and 0 shares of Class
B common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Our Class B common
stock is classified as authorized but unissued stock and will not
be voted at any shareholder meeting while it is classified in such
status. If your shares are registered directly in your name with
the Company’s registrar and transfer agent, Computershare Trust
Company, N.A. (“Computershare”), you are considered a shareholder
of record with respect to those shares. If your shares are held in
a bank or brokerage account, you are considered the “Beneficial
Owner” of those shares and should
respond to the communication you receive from the holder of record
as soon as possible so your shares can be represented at the Annual
Meeting.
VOTING PROCEDURES
Shareholders of record may vote using any of the methods listed
below. If you vote in advance (methods 1, 2 or 3, we must receive
your vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on June 6,
2022.
1. BY
MAIL:
If you requested printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you
will receive a proxy card, and you may vote by marking, signing and
dating your proxy card and returning it in the postage-paid
envelope provided. The named proxies will vote your stock according
to your directions. If you submit a signed proxy card without
indicating your vote, the person voting the proxy will vote your
stock in favor of the proposals.
2.