UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the
Registrant X
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
|
X
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12
|
CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
Fee computed in table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per
Exchange Act Rules 14(a)-6(i)(1) and 0-11
|
30 Corporate Drive, Suite 200
Burlington, MA 01803
+1 (781) 270-1200
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on October 4, 2022
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the
“Annual Meeting”) of CIRCOR International, Inc. (the “Company,”
“we,” “us” or “our”) will be held on October 4, 2022, at 3:00 PM
Eastern Daylight Savings Time (“EDT”). The Annual Meeting will be
held as a virtual meeting conducted exclusively via live webcast
at
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CIR2022.
The Annual Meeting is being called for the purpose of considering
and voting upon the following proposals:
1.To
elect six directors, Samuel R. Chapin, Tina M. Donikowski, Bruce
Lisman, Helmuth Ludwig, John (Andy) O'Donnell and Jill D. Smith,
for one-year terms, such terms to continue until the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders in 2023 and until each such director’s successor is
duly elected and qualified or until such director’s earlier death,
resignation or removal;
2.To
ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of the Company's Board
of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent
auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022;
3.To
consider an advisory vote approving the compensation of the
Company’s Named Executive Officers; and
4.To
act upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual
Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has fixed the
close of business on August 22, 2022 as the record date for
determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote
at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements
thereof. Only holders of record of the Company's common stock, par
value $0.01 per share, at the close of business on that date will
be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and
any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Our Board recommends you vote “FOR” each of the nominees proposed
by our Board for election as directors (Proposal 1), “FOR” the
ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the
Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December
31, 2022 (Proposal 2), and “FOR” the advisory vote approving the
compensation of our Named Executive Officers
(Proposal 3).
AFTER CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, THE COMPANY HAS DETERMINED TO HOLD A
VIRTUAL MEETING IN ORDER TO FACILITATE STOCKHOLDER ATTENDANCE AND
PARTICIPATION BY ENABLING STOCKHOLDERS TO PARTICIPATE FROM ANY
LOCATION AND AT NO COST. YOU WILL BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING
ONLINE, VOTE YOUR SHARES ELECTRONICALLY AND SUBMIT QUESTIONS DURING
THE MEETING BY VISITING
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CIR2022.
To participate in the virtual meeting, you will need the 16-digit
control number included on your proxy card or voting instruction
form. The meeting webcast will begin promptly at 3:00 PM (EDT). We
encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. Online
check-in will begin at 2:45 PM (EDT), and you should allow ample
time for check-in procedures. If you encounter any difficulties
accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time,
please call the technical support number that will be posted on the
Virtual Stockholder Meeting log-in page.
If your shares are held by a broker, bank or other custodian
(commonly referred to as shares held "in street name"), the holder
of your shares will provide you with a copy of this Proxy
Statement, a voting instruction form and directions on how to
provide voting instructions. These directions may allow you to vote
over the internet or by telephone. Unless you provide voting
instructions, your shares will not be voted on any matter except
for the ratification of the selection of our independent auditors
(Proposal 2). To ensure your shares are voted in each of the other
matters, we encourage you to provide instructions on how to vote
your shares no later than 5:00 PM (EDT) on October 3, 2022. A list
of our registered holders will be available to stockholders of
record electronically during the Annual Meeting. If you would like
to review the list, please email
officeofthegeneralcounsel@CIRCOR.com.
Having your shares represented and voted at the Annual Meeting is
extremely important. All stockholders are cordially invited to
attend the Annual Meeting online.
WHETHER YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, AND TO FACILITATE
TIMELY RECEIPT OF YOUR VOTE, PLEASE VOTE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. YOU
ARE URGED TO DATE, SIGN AND RETURN YOUR PROXY CARD IN THE ENVELOPE
PROVIDED TO YOU, OR TO VOTE BY INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE AS
DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT, EVEN IF YOU PLAN TO VIRTUALLY
ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, SO THAT YOUR SHARES CAN BE VOTED
REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU ATTEND. VOTING NOW WILL NOT LIMIT YOUR
RIGHT TO CHANGE YOUR VOTE OR TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING; IF YOU
SHOULD BE PRESENT AT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND DESIRE TO VOTE DURING
THE MEETING, YOU MAY WITHDRAW YOUR PROXY AT SUCH TIME. ONLY THE
LATEST VALIDLY EXECUTED PROXY THAT YOU TIMELY SUBMIT WILL BE
COUNTED. IF YOUR SHARES ARE HELD IN THE NAME OF A BROKER, BANK OR
OTHER HOLDER OF RECORD, FOLLOW THE VOTING INSTRUCTIONS YOU RECEIVED
FROM THE HOLDER OF RECORD IN ORDER TO VOTE YOUR
SHARES.
Helmuth Ludwig
Chair, CIRCOR Board of Directors
September 8, 2022
WHETHER YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU ARE REQUESTED TO
COMPLETE YOUR PROXY CARD AS INDICATED ABOVE. YOUR PROXY CARD IS
REVOCABLE UNTIL THE TIME SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY’S PROXY
STATEMENT, AND, IF YOU ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU MAY VOTE
DURING THE MEETING EVEN IF YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED YOUR PROXY
CARD.
PROXY STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
PROXY STATEMENT
|
|
PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
|
Director Nominations |
|
Composition of Director Nominees and Continuing
Directors |
|
Director Biographies and Qualifications |
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
|
Role of the Board |
|
Key Areas of Board Oversight |
|
Board Leadership Structure |
|
Principles of Corporate Governance |
|
Director Independence |
|
Board Meetings and Committees |
|
Corporate Governance Framework |
|
Directors Candidates |
|
Communication with Independent Directors |
|
Stockholder Engagement |
|
Board Evaluation Process |
|
Director Compensation |
|
Reimbursement for Training and Reasonable Related
Travel |
|
Stock Ownership Guidelines |
|
Code of Conduct & Business Ethics/Compliance Training/Reporting
of Concerns |
|
Environmental & Social Commitments |
|
Corporate Political Contributions |
|
Related Person Transactions |
|
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT |
|
MANAGEMENT
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
|
|
Overview |
|
Executive Summary |
|
What Guides Our Program |
|
2021 Executive Compensation In Detail |
|
Other Executive Compensation Practices & Policies |
|
SUMMARY OF CASH AND CERTAIN OTHER COMPENSATION AND OTHER PAYMENTS
TO THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
|
Summary Compensation
Table
|
|
2021 All Other Compensation
Table
|
|
2021 Grants of Plan-Based
Awards
|
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020
Fiscal Year-End
|
|
2021 Option Exercises and Stock
Vested
|
|
2021 Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation
|
|
SEVERANCE AND OTHER BENEFITS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR
CHANGE OF CONTROL
|
|
CEO PAY RATIO
|
|
COMMITTEE REPORTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL 2 - RATIFICATION OF AUDITORS
|
|
PROPOSAL 3 - ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
|
EXPENSES OF SOLICITATION
|
|
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR ANNUAL MEETING IN
2020
|
|
“HOUSEHOLDING” OF ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS
|
|
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS |
|
OTHER MATTERS
|
|
Forward-Looking Statements
This Proxy Statement contains certain statements that are
“forward-looking statements” as that term is defined under the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). The
words “may,” “hope,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,”
“intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue”
and other expressions which are predictions of or indicate future
events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters,
identify forward-looking statements. We believe that it is
important to communicate our future expectations to our
stockholders, and we, therefore, make forward-looking statements in
reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of the Act. However, there
may be events in the future that we are not able to accurately
predict or control, and our actual results may differ materially
from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements, including statements about
our future performance, the outcome, if any, of the Board of
Director's review of strategic alternatives, the Company's exit
from the Pipeline Engineering business, the expected and potential
direct and indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our
business, our ability to remediate the material weaknesses in our
internal control over financial reporting, the number of new
product launches and future cash flows from operating activities
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors,
which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to
differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such
differences include, but are not limited to, the duration and scope
of the COVID-19 pandemic; any adverse changes in governmental
policies; variability of raw material and component pricing;
changes in our suppliers’ performance; fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates; changes in tariffs or other taxes related
to doing business internationally; our ability to hire and retain
key personnel; our ability to operate our manufacturing facilities
at efficient levels, including our ability to prevent cost overruns
and reduce costs; our ability to generate increased cash by
reducing our working capital; our prevention of the accumulation of
excess inventory; fluctuations in interest rates; our ability to
successfully defend product liability actions; the inability to
identify or execute a strategic transaction; the impact on the
Company of the situation in Russia and the Ukraine; as well as the
uncertainty associated with the current worldwide economic
conditions and the continuing impact on economic and financial
conditions in the United States and around the world, including as
a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, natural disasters, terrorist
attacks and similar matters. For a discussion of these risks,
uncertainties and other factors, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk
Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2021. We undertake no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result
of new information, future events, or otherwise.

30 Corporate Drive, Suite 200
Burlington, MA 01803
+ (781) 270-1200
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on October 4, 2022
This Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”) is furnished in
connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of
Directors (the “Board”) of CIRCOR International, Inc. (the
“Company,” “CIRCOR,” “we,” “us” or “our”) for use at the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held on October 4,
2022, at 3:00 PM Eastern Daylight Savings Time ("EDT"), and any
adjournments or postponements thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). The
Annual Meeting will be held as a virtual meeting conducted
exclusively via live webcast at
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CIR2022.
Our annual report to stockholders and our proxy materials
(including this Proxy Statement and a form of proxy) were first
sent or given to stockholders on or about September 8,
2022.
At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders of the Company will be
asked to consider and vote upon the following matters:
1.To
elect six directors, Samuel R. Chapin, Tina M. Donikowski, Bruce
Lisman, Helmuth Ludwig, John (Andy) O'Donnell and Jill D. Smith,
for one-year terms, such terms to continue until the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders in 2023 and until each such director’s successor is
duly elected and qualified or until such director's earlier death,
resignation or removal;
2.To
ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Company of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2022;
3.To
consider an advisory vote approving the compensation of the
Company’s Named Executive Officers;
4.To
act upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual
Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Record Date
The Board has fixed the close of business on August 22, 2022 as the
record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to
notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”).
Only holders of record of the Company’s common stock, par value
$0.01 per share (the “common stock”), at the close of business on
the Record Date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the
Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. As of
the Record Date, there were 20,361,631 shares of common stock
outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each holder
of our outstanding common stock as of the close of business on the
Record Date will be entitled to one vote for each share held of
record with respect to each matter submitted at the Annual
Meeting.
Voting Requirements
The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of at least a
majority of the total number of outstanding shares of common stock
entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Shares present
virtually during the Annual Meeting will be considered shares of
common stock represented in person at the meeting. For Proposal 1,
the election of six directors, each nominee shall be elected as a
director of the Company if such nominee receives a majority of the
votes cast at the Annual Meeting with respect to such nominee
(i.e., the number of shares voted “for” a director nominee must
exceed the number of shares voted “against” such nominee). The
approval of a majority of the votes cast is also necessary to
approve Proposal 2, the ratification of the selection of Ernst
& Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2022; and Proposal 3, the
consideration of an advisory vote approving the compensation of the
Company’s Named Executive Officers.
Abstentions and
“Broker Non-Votes”
Abstentions and “broker non-votes” (i.e., shares represented at the
meeting held by brokers or nominees as to which instructions have
not been received from the beneficial owners or persons entitled to
vote such shares and with respect to which the broker or nominee
does not have discretionary voting power to vote such shares) will
be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present
for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. With respect
to the election of directors (Proposal 1), votes may be cast “for,”
“against” or “abstain” for each nominee. With respect to Proposals
2 and 3, votes may be cast "for," "against" or "abstain." In the
case of Proposals 1, 2 and 3, under our By-Laws, abstentions are
not considered votes on such matter and will have the effect of
reducing the number of affirmative votes required to achieve a
majority for such matters by reducing the total number of shares
from which the majority is calculated. Proposals 1 and 3 are each
“non-discretionary” items and, therefore, brokers and nominees do
not have discretionary voting power with respect to such matters.
If you do not instruct your broker how to vote with respect to such
matter, your broker may not vote with respect to these items, and
broker non-votes will have the effect of reducing the number of
affirmative votes required to achieve a majority for such matter by
reducing the total number of shares from which the majority is
calculated.
How to Vote Your Shares
AFTER CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, THE COMPANY HAS DETERMINED TO HOLD A
VIRTUAL MEETING IN ORDER TO FACILITATE STOCKHOLDER ATTENDANCE AND
PARTICIPATION BY ENABLING STOCKHOLDERS TO PARTICIPATE FROM ANY
LOCATION AND AT NO COST. YOU WILL BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING
ONLINE, VOTE YOUR SHARES ELECTRONICALLY AND SUBMIT QUESTIONS DURING
THE MEETING BY VISITING
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com.
To participate in the virtual meeting, you will need the 16-digit
control number included on your proxy card or voting instruction
form. The meeting webcast will begin promptly at 3:00 PM (EDT). We
encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. Online
check- in will begin at 2:45 PM (EDT), and you should allow ample
time for check-in procedures. If you encounter any difficulties
accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time,
please call the technical support number that will be posted on the
virtual meeting login page.
We are committed to ensuring that stockholders will be afforded the
same rights and opportunities to participate in the virtual Annual
Meeting as they would at an in-person meeting. You will be able to
attend the meeting online, vote your shares electronically and
submit questions during the meeting by visiting
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CIR2022. We will try to answer as
many stockholder-submitted questions as time permits that comply
with the meeting rules of conduct. However, we reserve the right to
edit inappropriate language or to exclude questions that are not
pertinent to meeting matters or that are otherwise inappropriate.
If we receive substantially similar questions, we will group such
questions together and provide a single response to avoid
repetition. If we are unable to respond to a stockholder’s properly
submitted question due to time constraints, we will either post the
response on the investor relations section of our website following
the Annual Meeting, or respond directly to that stockholder using
the contact information provided.
If your shares are held by a broker, bank or other custodian
(commonly referred to as shares held "in street name"), the holder
of your shares will provide you with a copy of this Proxy
Statement, a voting instruction form and directions on how to
provide voting instructions. These directions may allow you to vote
over the internet or by telephone. Unless you provide voting
instructions, your shares will not be voted on any matter except
for the ratification of the selection of our independent auditors
(Proposal 2). To ensure your shares are counted in each of the
other matters, we encourage you to provide instructions on how to
vote your shares no later than 5:00 PM (EDT) on October 3, 2022. A
list of our registered holders will be available to stockholders of
record electronically during the Annual Meeting. If you would like
to review the list, please email
officeofthegeneralcounsel@CIRCOR.com.
Having your shares represented and voted at the Annual Meeting is
extremely important.
WHETHER YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, AND TO FACILITATE
TIMELY RECEIPT OF YOUR VOTE, PLEASE VOTE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. YOU
ARE URGED TO DATE, SIGN AND RETURN YOUR PROXY CARD IN THE ENVELOPE
PROVIDED TO YOU, OR TO VOTE BY INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE AS
DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT, EVEN IF YOU PLAN TO VIRTUALLY
ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, SO THAT YOUR SHARES CAN BE VOTED
REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING. VOTING NOW
WILL NOT LIMIT YOUR RIGHT TO CHANGE YOUR VOTE OR TO ATTEND THE
ANNUAL MEETING. IF YOU SHOULD BE PRESENT AT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND
DESIRE TO VOTE DURING THE MEETING, YOU MAY WITHDRAW YOUR PROXY CARD
AT SUCH TIME. ONLY THE LATEST VALIDLY EXECUTED PROXY CARD THAT YOU
TIMELY SUBMIT WILL BE COUNTED. IF YOUR SHARES ARE HELD IN THE NAME
OF A BROKER, BANK OR OTHER HOLDER OF RECORD, FOLLOW THE VOTING
INSTRUCTIONS YOU RECEIVED FROM THE HOLDER OF RECORD IN ORDER TO
VOTE YOUR SHARES.
If you are a stockholder whose shares are registered in your name,
you may vote your shares by one of the following
methods:
1.By
attending the Annual Meeting online. During the Annual Meeting
visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting/CIR2022 and enter the 16-digit
control number included in your proxy materials or proxy card. Have
your proxy card or voting instruction form available when you
access the virtual meeting webpage.
2.Vote
by Internet
by going to the web address
www.proxyvote.com
in advance of the Annual Meeting. The voting system is available 24
hours a day until 11:59 p.m. EDT on Monday, October 3, 2022. Once
you enter the internet voting system, you can record and confirm
(or change) your voting instructions. You must have the 16-digit
control number that is on your proxy card when voting.
3.Vote
by telephone
by dialing 1-800-690-6903 or use the telephone number shown on your
proxy card. The telephone voting systems is available 24 hours a
day in the United States until 11:59 Eastern Time on Monday,
October 3, 2022. Once you enter the telephone voting system, a
series of prompts will tell you how to record and confirm (or
change) your voting instructions.
4.Vote
by mail. If you received a proxy card, mark your voting
instructions on the card, sign, date and return it in the
postage-paid envelope provided. For your mailed proxy card to be
counted, we must receive it before 8:00 a.m. EDT on Monday, October
3, 2022. If you vote by Internet or telephone, please do not mail
your proxy card.
Common stock represented by properly executed proxy cards received
by the Company and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting
in accordance with the instructions contained therein.
If instructions are not given in your proxy card, properly executed
proxy cards will be voted “FOR” the election of the Board’s
nominees for director,
“FOR”
ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the
Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December
31, 2022, and “FOR” approval of the resolution regarding
compensation of the Company’s Named Executive
Officers.
How to Revoke a Previously Submitted Proxy Card
Any properly completed proxy card given by stockholders whose
shares are registered in their name pursuant to this solicitation
may be revoked by one of the following methods:
1.You
may revoke your proxy and change your vote by attending the Annual
Meeting online and voting electronically during the meeting.
However, your attendance online at the Annual Meeting will not
automatically revoke your proxy unless you properly vote
electronically during the Annual Meeting or specifically request
that your prior proxy be revoked by delivering a written notice
revocation prior to the Annual Meeting to the Corporate Secretary
at the Company's Corporate headquarters at 30 Corporate Drive,
Suite 200, Burlington, MA 01803;
2.Properly
casting a new vote via the Internet or by telephone at any time
before the closure of the Internet or telephone voting facilities;
or
3.Duly
completing a later-dated proxy card relating to the same shares and
delivering it to the Corporate Secretary before the taking of the
vote at the Annual Meeting.
To be effective, any written notice of revocation or subsequent
proxy cards must be sent so as to be delivered to the Corporate
Secretary at the Company’s corporate headquarters before the taking
of the vote at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in
“street name,” you must follow the instructions on your voting
instructions form to revoke or amend any prior voting
instructions.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for
the Stockholder Meeting to be held on October 4, 2022:
This Proxy Statement, a form of the Company’s proxy card, a letter
to stockholders from the Chair of our Board, a letter to
stockholders from our President and Chief Executive Officer,
together with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2021 (“Fiscal Year 2021”), are available for
viewing, printing and downloading at
www.proxy.CIRCOR.com.
Except where otherwise incorporated by reference, none of the
Annual Report, the letter from the Chair of our Board to our
stockholders, or the letter from our President and Chief Executive
Officer to our stockholders is a part of the proxy solicitation
material. Except for the availability of this Proxy Statement and
the Company’s form of proxy card for the Annual Meeting, which are
available for viewing, printing and downloading at
www.proxy.CIRCOR.com,
the information on the Company’s website is not part of this Proxy
Statement.
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Under our Articles of Organization and By-Laws, our board has
completed its transition from a classified board to the annual
election of all directors. At the Annual Meeting (and at each
annual meeting of stockholders thereafter), all directors will
stand for election for one-year terms expiring at the next
succeeding annual meeting of stockholders.
Our board has nominated Samuel R. Chapin, Tina M. Donikowski, Bruce
Lisman, Helmuth Ludwig, John (Andy) O'Donnell, and Jill D. Smith
for re-election as directors, each to hold office until the 2023
annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective
successors have been duly elected and qualified or until their
earlier death, resignation or removal.
Our Board recommends a vote FOR each of our nominees.
Vote Required For Approval; Effect of Abstentions and Broker
Non-Votes
A quorum being present, each nominee shall be elected as a director
of the Company if such nominee receives a majority of the votes
cast at the meeting with respect to such nominee. Abstentions and
broker non-votes will have no effect on this Proposal
1.
Information Regarding Director Nominees and Other Continuing
Directors
The following table provides information about each nominee for
director and the other continuing directors. Detailed information
about each individual’s qualifications, experience, skills and
expertise along with select professional and community
contributions can be found below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
Position |
Age |
Director Since |
Audit |
Compensation |
N&CG* |
Independent |
Samuel R. Chapin |
Director |
65 |
2019 |
t |
|
l |
X |
Tina M. Donikowski |
Director |
63 |
2017 |
l |
l |
t |
X |
Bruce Lisman |
Director |
75 |
2020 |
l |
l |
|
X |
Helmuth Ludwig
t
|
Chair |
60 |
2016 |
|
|
|
X |
John (Andy) O'Donnell |
Director |
74 |
2011 |
|
t |
l |
X |
Jill D. Smith |
Director |
64 |
2020 |
l |
|
l |
X |
t
Chair l
Member
*N&CG: Nominating & Corporate Governance
Committee
Director Nominations
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recognizes that
the challenges and needs of the Company will vary over time and,
accordingly, considers that the selection of director nominees
should be based on skill sets most pertinent to the issues facing
or likely to face the Company at the time of nomination as well as
the diversity the nominee would add to the Board. When assessing
nominees to serve as director, the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee believes that the Company will benefit from a
diversity of background and experience, as well as gender and
racial/ethnic diversity, on the Board. In addition, there are
certain general attributes that the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee seeks from all director candidates,
including:
•A
commitment to ethics and integrity;
•A
commitment to personal and organizational
accountability;
•A
history of achievement that reflects superior standards for
themselves and others; and
•A
willingness to express alternate points of view while, at the same
time, being respectful of the opinions of others and working
collaboratively with colleagues.
Our Principles of Corporate Governance require that a majority of
directors must be independent. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee’s position is that, absent special
circumstances, all directors other than the Chief Executive
Officer, if he or she is serving on the Board, should be
independent. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
annually assesses the adequacy of the foregoing criteria for Board
membership and have concluded that, based on the
background and experience as described below of each director, the
Board reflects diversity in business and professional experience
and skills.
As a matter of good corporate governance, we generally limit the
number of public company directorships any director of the Company
may hold to three, including that of the Company. This policy
assists the Board in continuing to focus on and carry out the Board
activities of the Company efficiently. Previously, Ms. Donikowski
was granted an exception to this policy so that she could serve on
one additional public company board; such additional board
membership ceased in 2022.
Composition of Director Nominees and Continuing
Directors
Our Board members have a varied set of skills and experience,
creating a diversity of skills and viewpoints. Among our six
nominees:
•6
of 6 are independent
•33%
are women
•33%
of our directors are born outside the United States
•The
average age is 66.8 years of age.
•The
average tenure on the Board is 4.7 years.
Director Biographies and Qualifications
Our nominees and other continuing directors have extensive
experience and qualifications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapin |
Donikowski |
Lisman |
Ludwig |
O’Donnell |
Smith |
Geography |
Asia |
|
X |
|
|
X |
X |
Europe |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
S America |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Industry/End Market |
Industrial |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
Defense Aerospace |
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
Food & Bev |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Function
|
CEO – Public, Private |
X |
|
|
|
X |
X |
CEO – Div. Pres. |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Commercial – Sales / Channel |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Commercial - Marketing |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
R&D / NPD |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
Finance - CFO |
X |
X |
|
|
|
X |
Finance - Cap markets |
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
HR – Talent Management |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
Tech – IT/cyber |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
Tech – Digitization |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
Ops – Manufacturing |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
Ops – Supply Chain |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
M&A - Transactions |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
M&A - Integration |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
Actively Employed (Y/N) |
N |
N |
N |
Y |
N |
N |
Director Nominees
Samuel R. Chapin.
Mr. Chapin has served as a member of the Board since January 2019.
Mr. Chapin served as Executive Vice Chairman at the Bank of America
Merrill Lynch, a multinational investment bank, from 2010 to his
retirement in June 2016.
Mr. Chapin joined Merrill Lynch in 1984 as a member of the Mergers
and Acquisitions group and he was named a Managing Director in
Investment Banking in 1993. Mr. Chapin was named Senior Vice
President and head of Merrill Lynch’s Global Investment Banking
Division in 2001 and was named Vice Chairman in 2003. While at
Merrill Lynch and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Mr. Chapin was
responsible for managing relationships with a number of the firm’s
largest corporate clients. He currently serves on the Board of
Directors of PerkinElmer, Inc., and O-I Glass, Inc. and the Board
of Trustees at Lafayette College. Mr. Chapin’s qualifications to
sit on our Board include his experience and significant knowledge
of the industrials market with a mastery of strategic M&A
accrued over more than 35 years in investment banking.
Tina M. Donikowski.
Ms. Donikowski has served as a member of the Board since March
2017. Ms. Donikowski retired from General Electric Company, a
diversified industrial company, in October 2015 after 38 years with
the company. She served in a number of senior positions during her
career at General Electric Company, including most recently as Vice
President, Global Locomotive Business, GE Transportation, from
January 2013 until her retirement. She currently also serves on the
Board of Directors TopBuild Corp., a leading installer and
distributor of insulation and building material products to the
U.S. construction industry based in Daytona Beach, Florida;
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of
highly engineered precision power, measurement, and control
solutions for mission-critical applications and processes; and
Eriez Magnetics, a privately held manufacturer and designer of
magnetic, vibratory, and metal detection applications based in
Erie, Pennsylvania. Previously she served on the board of Atlas
Copco AB, a world-leading provider of sustainable productivity
solutions based in Stockholm, Sweden. Ms. Donikowski’s
qualifications to sit on our Board include her extensive experience
in leading technology businesses and her strong operations
background.
Bruce Lisman.
Mr. Lisman has served as a member of the Board since June 2020. Mr.
Lisman retired in 2009 from JP Morgan Chase & Co., a
multinational investment firm, where he had served as Chairman of
the Global Equities Division. From 1987 to 2008, he was Head or
Co-Head of the Global Equity Division at Bear Stearns Companies.
Mr. Lisman serves as a director of Myers Industries, Inc., a
material handling and distribution company, Associated Capital., a
financial services company that was spun-off from GAMCO Investors,
Inc., and National Life Group, a mutual life insurance company.
Prior board service includes PC Construction, an engineering and
construction company as Chairman from 2013 to 2019, and as a member
until 2021, and The Pep Boys, a nationwide auto parts retailer. Mr.
Lisman’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his financial
global business and leadership expertise.
Helmuth Ludwig.
Dr. Ludwig has served as a member of the Board since January
2016. From October 2016 until his retirement in December 2019,
he served as Global CIO for Siemens, a leading technology company.
He previously served among other roles as CEO of the Siemens
Industry Sector in North America from October 2011 to September
2014 and as President of Siemens PLM Software from August 2007 to
September 2010 where he is credited for having successfully led the
integration of the organization’s 50 legal entities and multiple
facilities across 26 countries. Earlier in his career, Dr.
Ludwig held a number of international assignments at Siemens in
Europe, Latin America, and Asia. Dr. Ludwig serves as a
member of the board of Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo since July 2020. He
teaches as a Professor of Practice for Strategy and
Entrepreneurship at Southern Methodist University Cox School of
Business in Dallas and is a Board Leadership Fellow with the
National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD). Dr.
Ludwig is a known expert and regular speaker at industry
conferences on the Internet of Things and “Industry 4.0.” Dr.
Ludwig’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his proven
manufacturing leadership skills, extensive international
experience, and his success in leading the integration and
simplification of a complex global enterprise.
John (Andy) O'Donnell.
Mr. O'Donnell has served as a member of the Board since
November 2011. Until his retirement in January 2014,
Mr. O'Donnell had worked at Baker Hughes, an oilfield services
company, since 1975. He served as Vice President of Baker Hughes
since 1998 and was appointed to Vice President, Office of the Chief
Executive Officer in 2012, a role in which he served until his
retirement. From 2009 to 2011, Mr. O'Donnell was
President, Western Hemisphere Operations of Baker Hughes. He was
President of Baker Petrolite Corporation from 2005 to 2009 and
President of Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids from 2004 to 2005. He
served as Vice President, Business Process Development at Baker
Hughes from 1998 to 2002 and as Vice President of Manufacturing at
Baker Oil Tools from 1990 to 1998. Mr. O'Donnell also serves
on the Board of Directors of Cactus, Inc., where he is a member of
its Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committees. Mr. O'Donnell’s qualifications to sit on our Board
include his experience in international energy markets and leading
multinational sales, marketing, service and manufacturing
operations.
Jill D. Smith.
Ms. Smith has served as a member of the Board since January 2020.
Ms. Smith most recently served as President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director of Allied Minds plc, an intellectual property
commercialization company focused on technology and life sciences
from March 2017 until her retirement in June 2019. She previously
had served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of
DigitalGlobe, Inc., a global provider of satellite imagery products
and services, from 2005 to 2011. Ms. Smith started her career as a
consultant at Bain & Company where she rose to Partner. She
then joined Sara Lee as
Vice President and subsequently went on to serve as President and
Chief Executive Officer of SRDS, a business-to-business publishing
firm and later as President and Chief Executive Officer of eDial, a
VoIP collaboration company. Furthermore, she served as Chief
Operating Officer of Micron Electronics, and co-founded and led
Treacy & Company, a consulting and boutique investment firm.
Ms. Smith currently serves on the Board of Directors of R1 RCM
Inc., where she is a member of the Audit and Human Capital
Committee, AspenTech, where she is Chair of the Board and Chair of
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and MDA, where
she is Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee and a
member of the Human Resource Development and Compensation
Committee. Ms. Smith’s qualifications to sit on our Board includes
her extensive experience as a technology executive, including as a
CEO focused on growing innovative companies.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Role of the Board
The Board is elected by the Company’s stockholders to oversee their
interests in the value and health of the Company and drive
long-term value creation. The Board oversees the implementation of
and compliance with standards of accountability and monitors the
effectiveness of management policies and decisions, including those
related to financial and other internal controls, compliance with
laws and regulations and corporate governance. It has retained
oversight authority of the Company, except for those matters
reserved to or shared with the stockholders.
Key Areas of Board Oversight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy |
Risk |
Succession Planning |
Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) Matters |
•The
Board oversees the Company’s annual business plan and monitors
strategic planning
•Business
strategy is a key focus at the Board level and embedded in the work
of Board committees
•Company
management is charged with developing and executing business
strategy and provides regular performance updates to the
Board
|
•The
Board oversees risk management, including the enterprise risk
management process
•Board
committees, which meet regularly and report back to the full Board,
play significant roles in carrying out the risk oversight
function
•Company
management is charged with managing risk, through robust internal
processes and effective internal controls
•The
Audit Committee oversees financial risk, related party
transactions, and cybersecurity
•The
Compensation Committee oversees the balance of risk and
incentives
•The
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee oversees employee
health and safety
|
•The
Board oversees succession planning and talent development for the
Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the executive leadership
team
•The
Compensation Committee has primary responsibility for developing
succession plans for the CEO
•The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee manages the emergency
CEO succession planning process
•The
CEO is charged with preparing, and reviewing with the Compensation
Committee, talent development plans for senior executives and their
potential successors
|
•The
Board oversees execution of the Company’s ESG
strategies
•The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees ESG
elements, with a particular focus on the Company’s Diversity &
Inclusion initiatives, human capital management and employee health
and safety
|
Strategy.
The Board has oversight responsibility for management’s
establishment and execution of corporate strategy. Elements of
strategy are discussed at every regularly scheduled Board meeting.
Senior management presents a consolidated annual business plan, and
the Board discusses the Company’s results relative to the plan
periodically throughout the year. At least once a year, each of the
business groups presents an in-depth review of their business to
the Board, which includes a review of strategic goals and
performance relative to strategy. In 2020, the Board reviewed the
Company’s five-year strategic plan.
Risk.
The Board and its committees oversee key Company risks. The Board
regularly reviews the Company’s top enterprise risks from
management, assessing, among other concerns, risks associated with
the Company’s products, customers, supply chain, management, staff,
efficiency, and cybersecurity. The Board receives regular reports
on management’s risk mitigation measures. Committees have
responsibility for assisting the Board in its oversight of risk,
including focus on certain risk areas,
such as cybersecurity, related party transactions, and
environmental, health and safety (including employee health and
safety), and the committee calendars include periodic reviews and
discussions on those topics.
Succession Planning.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the
emergency CEO succession process on an annual basis, while the full
Board reviews overall succession planning. Such planning includes a
review with the CEO of the succession planning for key executives
of the Company.
ESG Matters.
Primary responsibility for assisting the Board with ESG matter
oversight belongs to the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee. With this responsibility, the committee reviews
sustainability matters, governance items, progress on increasing
diversity and inclusion and the Company's human capital strategy,
plans and associated activities.
Board Leadership Structure
The Board has established a leadership structure that separates the
roles of Chair of the Board and CEO. In doing so, the Board
considered that separating the roles of Chair and CEO would most
effectively provide the Company access to the judgments and
experience of the Chair of the Board and the CEO, while providing a
mechanism for the Board’s independent oversight of management. The
Company's President and Chief Executive Officer is currently not a
member of the Board. As Chair of the Board, Mr. Helmuth Ludwig
presides over the meetings of the Board and the stockholders,
utilizing his experience in corporate governance, familiarity with
the Company and leadership. In addition to presiding over Board
meetings, Mr. Ludwig approves Board agendas and schedules, monitors
activity of the Board’s committees, communicates regularly with the
CEO and other management on behalf of the Board, monitors and
participates in communication with major stockholders, leads the
annual performance evaluations of the CEO and leads the CEO
succession planning process.
Principles of Corporate Governance
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has developed,
and the full Board has adopted, a set of Principles of Corporate
Governance. The Principles of Corporate Governance are available on
the Company’s website at
www.CIRCOR.com
under the “Investors” sub-link, and a hard copy will be provided by
the Company free of charge to any stockholder who requests it by
writing to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s corporate
headquarters. An annual review is conducted by the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee to assess compliance with the
Principles of Corporate Governance.
In addition, to align the interests of the directors and executive
officers of the Company with the interests of the stockholders, the
Principles of Corporate Governance include Stock Ownership
Guidelines for directors and executive officers.
Director Independence
The Board, upon consideration of all relevant facts and
circumstances and upon recommendation of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee, has affirmatively determined that
each of Mr. Chapin, Ms. Donikowski, Mr. Lisman, Mr. Ludwig, Mr.
O’Donnell and Ms. Smith is independent of the Company. The Board
also previously determined that David Dietz and Peter Wilver, each
a former director who served during part of Fiscal Year 2021, were
independent of the Company prior to their respective retirements
from the Board in Fiscal Year 2021 and that and Arthur George, Jr.,
a former director who served during part of Fiscal Year 2022, was
independent of the Company prior to his resignation from the Board
in Fiscal Year 2022. In evaluating the independence of each
director, the Board applied the standards and guidelines set forth
in the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and
New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) regulations in determining that
each director has no material relationship with the Company,
directly or as a partner, stockholder or affiliate of an
organization that has a relationship with the Company. The bases
for the Board’s determination include, but are not limited to, the
following:
•No
director is an employee of the Company, or its subsidiaries or
affiliates.
•No
director has an immediate family member who is an officer of the
Company or its subsidiaries or has any other current or past
material relationship with the Company.
•No
director receives, or in the past three years, has received, any
compensation from the Company other than compensation for services
as a director.
•No
director has a family member who has received any compensation
during the past three years from the Company.
•No
director, during the past three years, has been affiliated with, or
had an immediate family member who has been affiliated with, a
present or former internal or external auditor of the
Company.
•No
executive officer of the Company serves on the compensation
committee or the board of directors of any corporation that employs
a director or a member of any director’s immediate
family.
•No
director is an officer or employee (or has an immediate family
member who is an officer or employee) of an organization that sells
products and services to, or receives products and services from,
the Company in excess of the greater of $1 million or 2% of such
organization’s consolidated gross revenues in any fiscal
year.
Board Meetings and Committees
We believe that our current Board leadership structure fosters
appropriate oversight for the Company for a number of reasons, the
most significant of which are discussed below. The Board’s
oversight is coordinated primarily through the committees of the
Board, as disclosed in the descriptions of each of the committees
below and in the charters of each of the committees (which are
available on the Company’s website at
www.CIRCOR.com
under the “Investors” sub-link). The full Board, however, retains
responsibility for general oversight of the Company’s long-term
health and stakeholder interests. The Board held 5 meetings during
Fiscal Year 2021.
Our Board maintains three standing committees: an Audit Committee,
a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee. The following table sets forth the number of meetings
held during Fiscal Year 2021 by each committee of the Board. Each
of our directors attended at least 75% of the total number of
meetings of the Board and of the committees of which such director
then served.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOARD COMMITTEE OVERVIEW |
Committee |
Oversight Responsibilities |
2021 Meetings
|
Audit |
•Oversees
integrity of financial statements
•Responsible
for appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of work of
the independent auditor
•Reviews
scope and results of annual audit with independent
auditor
•Reviews
annual/quarterly operating results with independent
auditor
•Considers
the adequacy of internal accounting procedures/controls; considers
the effect of these on auditor independence
•Oversees
internal audit function
•Oversees
financial and cybersecurity risks
•Reviews
and approves related party transactions
•Meets
in executive session separately with each of the Chief Financial
Officer, Internal Audit lead and our independent auditor engagement
partner
|
7 |
Compensation |
•Determines
and oversees pay for performance compensation
philosophy
•Oversees
compensation arrangements for executive officers and other senior
level employees
•Reviews
general compensation levels for other employees
•Determines
incentive compensation awards to be granted to eligible
persons
|
5 |
Nominating &
Corporate Governance |
•Establishes
criteria for selection of new directors
•Identifies
individuals qualified to become directors
•Recommends
director candidates to the Board for nomination as
directors
•Makes
recommendations regarding director compensation
•Reviews
ESG matters, including diversity & inclusion initiatives, human
capital and governance
•Provides
oversight of the Company’s corporate governance
•Manages
CEO emergency succession planning process
•Drives
evaluation process for Board and its committees
|
5 |
Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee, which consists of Mr. Chapin, Ms. Donikowski,
Mr. Lisman, and Ms. Smith (each of whom has been affirmatively
determined by the full Board to be an independent director, as well
as meeting the stricter independence standards applicable to audit
committee members under NYSE listing standards and the rules of the
SEC), oversees the integrity of the Company’s financial statements
and is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation,
retention and oversight of the work of the firm of independent
auditors (the “Auditors”) that audits the Company’s financial
statements and performs services related to the audit. Among other
responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviews the scope and results
of the audit with the Auditors, reviews with management and the
Auditors the Company’s annual and quarterly operating results,
considers the adequacy of the Company’s internal accounting
procedures and controls and considers the effect of such procedures
on the Auditors’ independence. The Audit Committee also is
responsible for overseeing the Company’s internal audit function,
the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and
cybersecurity issues, and the
review and approval of related party transactions. To satisfy these
oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee separately meets
regularly with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Vice
President of Internal Audit, and the Auditors. Pursuant to the
requirements of the NYSE, the Audit Committee operates in
accordance with a charter (the “Audit Committee Charter”), which is
available on the Company’s website at
www.CIRCOR.com
under the “Investors” sub-link. The Company will provide a hard
copy of the Audit Committee Charter to stockholders free of charge
upon written request to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s
corporate headquarters. Each member of the Audit Committee meets
the financial literacy requirements of the NYSE and, in addition,
the Board has determined that at least one of the Committee’s
members, Mr. Chapin, is an “audit committee financial expert” under
the disclosure standards adopted by the SEC.
Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee, which consists of Mr. O’Donnell, Ms.
Donikowski, and Mr. Lisman (each of whom has been affirmatively
determined by the full Board to be an independent director, as well
as meeting the stricter independence standards applicable to
compensation committee members under NYSE listing standards and the
rules of the SEC), sets and oversees the Company’s compensation
philosophy and policy, reviews and determines the compensation
arrangements for the Company’s CEO; reviews the recommendations of
the CEO and approves the compensation arrangements for all other
officers and senior level employees; reviews general compensation
levels for other employees as a group; determines the awards to be
granted to eligible persons under the Company's 2019 Stock Option
and Incentive Plan (the "2019 Pan:); and takes such other action as
may be required in connection with the Company’s compensation and
incentive plans, including with respect to compensation and
risk-management issues. The Compensation Committee has the sole
authority from the Board for the appointment, compensation and
oversight of the Company’s outside compensation
consultant.
The Compensation Committee engaged Semler Brossy (“Semler”) in the
last quarter of the year ended December 31, 2021 ("Fiscal Year
2021") as its compensation consultant. In so doing, the
Compensation Committee affirmatively determined that Semler is
independent and has no conflict of interest as contemplated under
rules adopted by the SEC and the NYSE, and has conducted annual
reviews to confirm that Semler remains free of conflict per these
rules. Semler reports directly to the Compensation Committee and
does not provide any additional services to the Company. The
executive compensation services provided by Semler include
assisting in defining the Company’s executive compensation
strategy, providing market benchmark information, recommending the
composition of the compensation peer group used as a benchmark by
the Compensation Committee, advising with respect to the design of
both short-term and long-term incentive compensation plans, and
summarizing regulatory and governance guidelines. In making its
compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee relies
significantly on the information provided by Semler.
The Compensation Committee operates in accordance with a charter
(the “Compensation Committee Charter”), which is available on the
Company’s website at
www.CIRCOR.com
under the “Investors” sub-link. The Company also will provide a
hard copy of the Compensation Committee Charter to stockholders
free of charge upon written request to the Corporate Secretary at
the Company’s corporate headquarters.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which consists
of Ms. Donikowski, Mr. Chapin, Mr. O'Donnell, and Ms. Smith (each
of whom has been affirmatively determined by the full Board to be
an independent director), is responsible for establishing criteria
for selection of new directors, identifying individuals qualified
to become directors and recommending candidates to the Board for
nomination as directors. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board a
set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Company,
overseeing the evaluation process of the Board and the evaluation
of its committees, recommending to the Board appropriate levels of
director compensation and, together with the Audit Committee,
monitoring compliance with the Company’s Code of Conduct &
Business Ethics. The committee also oversees ESG, including human
capital, employee safety and diversity & inclusion initiatives.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates in
accordance with a charter (the “Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee Charter”), which is available on the Company’s website
at
www.CIRCOR.com
under the “Investors” sub-link. The Company also will provide a
hard copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Charter to stockholders free of charge upon written request to the
Corporate Secretary at the Company’s corporate
headquarters.
Ad Hoc Committees.
From time to time, the Board may establish ad hoc committees and
delegate certain of its authority for the purpose of addressing
particular matters (including, for example, the approval of
financing or credit agreements or other matters that the Board
thinks would be appropriate for review by an ad hoc committee).
There were no ad hoc committees in 2021. The Board established a a
special ad hoc committee on February 4, 2022, to assist with its
strategic alternatives review. Mr. Ludwig, Mr. Chapin, and Mr.
Lisman serve on the committee.
Executive Session.
Independent directors meet at least twice a year in executive
session without management, and at such other times as may be
requested by any independent director. During Fiscal Year 2021, the
Chair of the Board presided at meetings
of the Company’s independent directors held in executive session
without management. These sessions promote candor and discussion of
matters in a setting that is independent of
management.
Corporate Governance Framework
We have adopted Corporate Governance Principles that together with
our Board committee charters and our Code of Conduct provide our
governance framework. The following is a summary of our governance
framework:
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
|
We seek to implement corporate governance practices that ensure the
Company is managed for the long-term benefit of our stockholders.
To that end, we review and refine our corporate governance
policies, procedures and practices on an ongoing basis. |
Board and Board Committees |
Number of Independent Directors / Total Number of
Directors |
6/6 |
All Board Committees Consist of Independent Directors |
ü |
Risk Oversight by Full Board and Committees |
ü |
Separate Chair and CEO |
ü |
Regular Executive Sessions of Independent Directors |
ü |
Periodic Board and Committee Self-Evaluations |
ü |
Director Education and Orientation |
ü |
Periodic Equity Grants to Directors |
ü |
Majority voting standard for uncontested director
elections |
ü |
Declassified Board of Directors |
ü |
Stockholder Rights, Accountability and Other Governance
Practices |
|
Annual Advisory Stockholder Vote on Executive Compensation (“Say on
Pay”) |
ü |
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executives |
ü |
Policies Prohibiting Hedging and Pledging |
ü |
Absence of a Stockholder Rights Plan (also known as a “Poison
Pill”) |
ü |
Strong Commitment to Environmental and Sustainability
Matters |
ü |
No Related Party Transactions |
ü |
Director Candidates
In evaluating director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee applies the skills, experience, qualifications
and demeanor of the individual against the general criteria
described above in “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors for a Term
of One Year” and a developed skills matrix, taking into
consideration issues facing the Board and considering the diversity
of the Board. From time to time the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee uses a professional search firm to help
identify, evaluate and conduct due diligence on potential new
director candidates. Using a search firm allows the committee to
extend its reach for potential candidates as well as further ensure
a diverse pool. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
also evaluates director candidates recommended by stockholders in
the same manner as candidates from any other sources as described
below. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee develops a
short list that is shared with the Board for consideration and then
vetted. Final candidates are recommended to the Board to be
nominated for election at the annual meeting of
stockholders.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider
director candidates recommended by stockholders, provided that such
recommendations are submitted to the Company not less than 120
calendar days prior to the first anniversary date on which the
Company’s Proxy Statement was released to stockholders in
connection with the previous year’s annual meeting of
stockholders.
To be considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee for nomination and inclusion in the Company’s Proxy
Statement for its annual meeting to be held in 2023, stockholder
recommendations for directors must be received by the Corporate
Secretary at the Company’s corporate headquarters prior to May 11,
2023. Any such notice also must include (i) the
name and address of record of the stockholder; (ii) a
representation that the stockholder is a record holder of common
stock or, if the stockholder is not a record holder, evidence of
ownership in accordance with Rule 14a-8(b)(2) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); (iii) the
name, age, business and residential address, educational
background, current principal occupation or employment, and
principal occupation or employment for the preceding five full
fiscal years of the proposed director candidate; (iv) a description
of the qualifications of the proposed director candidate which
address the general criteria for directors as expressed in the
Company’s most recent Proxy Statement; (v) a description of all
arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and the
proposed director candidate; and (vi) the consent of the proposed
director candidate to be named in the Proxy Statement and to serve
as a director if elected at such meeting. Stockholders must also
submit any other information regarding the proposed candidate that
is required to be included in a Proxy Statement filed pursuant to
the rules of the SEC. Recommendations of director candidates that
meet the criteria described above will be forwarded to the Chair of
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for further
review and consideration by such committee. Stockholders also have
the right to directly nominate director candidates, without any
action or recommendation on the part of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee or the Board, by following the
procedures set forth in the Third Amended and Restated By-Laws of
the Company (the “By-Laws”).
Communication with Independent Directors
The Board has established a process through which interested
parties, including stockholders, may communicate with the
independent directors. Specifically, communications may be
addressed directly to the Chair of the Board, who, as discussed
above, is an independent director, and sent to CIRCOR’s Corporate
Secretary, by sending an email to
bod@circor.com
or by writing to the following address: Board of Directors, c/o
Corporate Secretary, CIRCOR International, Inc., 30 Corporate
Drive, Suite 200, Burlington, MA 01803, who will forward your
communication to the Chair.
Stockholder Engagement
We periodically conduct investor outreach throughout the year
involving our directors, senior management and investor relations
and legal departments. This helps management and the Board
understand and focus on the issues that matter most to our
stockholders. In 2021 and 2022, we met with investors to provide
visibility and transparency into our business, our performance and
our governance practices, and to better understand their
expectations.
Board Evaluation Process
Our Board continually seeks to improve its performance. Our
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the formal
evaluation process of the Board and its committees. On an annual
basis, the Board solicits and reviews feedback of self-evaluations
submitted by the directors, addressing matters such as the
composition of the Board, the relationship between the Board and
management of the Company, conduct of meetings of the Board and
strategic priorities for the Board. Each of the committees of the
Board undertakes a similar self-evaluation process. The Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the feedback from these
evaluations and identifies key areas of focus for the Board and the
individual committees.
Director Attendance at Annual Meeting
To date, our Board has not adopted a formal policy regarding
director attendance at annual meetings of our stockholders.
However, the Board typically schedules a meeting of the Board
either on or the day before the date of the annual meeting of
stockholders, and our directors, therefore, are encouraged to (and
typically do) attend the annual meeting. At our last annual meeting
of stockholders, which was held on May 25, 2021, all of our
then-serving directors were in attendance.
Director Compensation
The form and amount of director compensation are reviewed
periodically by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee,
most recently in December 2021. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee reviews our data from the Peer Group
Companies, which are outlined in the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis section of this document, as was prepared by ISS Corporate
Solutions, Inc. ("ISS") and broad survey data concerning director
compensation practices, levels, and trends for companies comparable
to the Company in revenue, business, and complexity. It also
considers the significant amount of time that our non-employee
directors spend in fulfilling their duties to the Company as well
as the required level of skill to serve on our Board. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends changes,
if any, to the Board for approval. Employee directors do not
receive separate compensation for service as
directors.
The Company uses a combination of cash and stock-based incentive
compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve as
non-employee directors on the Board. Cash compensation is paid
quarterly, in arrears. Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic
on the Company’s operations, the Board reduced each category of fee
and retainer our directors receives
by 15% in 2020. These retainer and fee reductions taken during 2020
to non-employee, director cash compensation were commensurate with
the reduction senior management took to their cash compensation in
light of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the Company. The
cash compensation reductions were lifted at the February 2021 Board
meeting effective April 1, 2021 after considering both internal and
external factors. The cash compensation our non-employee directors
earned in 2021 is as follows:
Annual Cash Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Retainer (Board Member) |
$72,188 |
Annual Retainer (Chair of the Board) |
$182,875 |
Chair Fee (Audit Committee) |
$19,250 |
Chair Fee (Compensation Committee) |
$14,438 |
Chair Fee (Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee) |
$9,625 |
Committee Membership Fee (per committee) |
$4,813 |
Annual Equity Grant
Our non-employee directors are also eligible to receive an annual
equity grant under our 2019 Plan. If a director joins the Board
during the middle of the year, the annual equity grant is pro-rated
based on the quarter in which the director joins the Board. In
2021, the targeted value of such grant was $105,000 which was the
same amount targeted for the annual equity grant in 2020. On March
17, 2021, each director, with the exception of Mr. Wilver, who
retired from the Board in April 2021, received a grant of 2,827
time-based restricted stock units (“Time RSUs”) which becomes
vested and settles in shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis
thirteen months from the date of grant, provided the non-employee
director is still providing services on the Board. The number of
Time RSUs was determined by dividing $105,000 by the average
closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange
based on the last 20 trading days weighted for volume through March
16, 2021, rounded up to the nearest whole share. The average
closing share price through March 16, 2021 was $37.15.
2021 Director Compensation
The following table shows the compensation our non-employee
directors earned for their services in 2021:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
Fees Earned in Cash
(1)
|
Stock
Awards
(2)
|
Total |
Samuel Chapin |
$98,063 |
$112,571 |
$210,634 |
David F. Dietz |
$60,563 |
$112,571 |
$173,134 |
Tina M. Donikowski |
$81,813 |
$112,571 |
$194,384 |
Bruce Lisman |
$81,813 |
$112,571 |
$194,384 |
Helmuth Ludwig |
$182,875 |
$112,571 |
$295,446 |
John (Andy) O'Donnell |
$91,438 |
$112,571 |
$204,009 |
Jill D. Smith |
$86,625 |
$112,571 |
$199,196 |
Peter M. Wilver |
$28,333 |
$0 |
$28,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The amounts shown in this column reflect the fees earned in Fiscal
Year 2021 for Board and committee service. The 15% reduction in
fees approved by the Board effective April 1, 2020 was lifted
effective April 1, 2021. Mr. Wilver and Mr. Dietz both retired from
the Board effective April 30, 2021 and September 30, 2021,
respectively. Mr. Chapin became Chair of the Audit Committee
effective January 1, 2021 taking over from Mr. Wilver. Director
fees continue to be paid quarterly in arrears.
|
(2) |
Reflects the grant date fair value of the annual equity grant made
in Time RSUs to each of the directors in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic
718. For a discussion of the assumptions related to the calculation
of the amounts in this column, refer to Note 13 (“Share-Based
Compensation”) to our audited consolidated financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2021 included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K filed with the SEC on July 26, 2022. The grant date fair
value of the Time RSUs was based on the Company's previous day
closing stock price prior to the grant date of March 17, 2021 of
$39.82. Mr. Wilver did not receive an annual grant in 2021 due to
his planned retirement. |
The total number of Time RSUs held by each non-employee director as
of December 31, 2021 was 2,827.
Deferred Compensation
Prior to 2019, non-employee directors were eligible to participate
in the Management Stock Purchase Plan (MSPP), which allowed them to
purchase RSUs at a discount of 33% to the closing price of the
Company’s common stock ("MSPP RSUs"), with RSU settlement deferred
for a minimum period of three years. In 2021, the last of these
MSPP RSUs were settled and distributed in shares. As of December
31, 2021, there were no outstanding balances for non-employee
directors under the MSPP.
Reimbursement for Training and Reasonable Related
Travel
Each of our directors has a budget of up to $5,000 USD (plus travel
costs) per year for relevant educational training. When possible,
directors are encouraged to share training opportunities with other
boards that they serve on and to split the costs for such
opportunities between those boards and the Company. Each of our
non-employee directors are also reimbursed for reasonable travel
and other expenses incurred in attending meetings.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Company has adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines for non-employee
directors to further align their interests with the interests of
the stockholders. These guidelines establish an expectation that,
within a five-year period, each director shall achieve an equity
interest in the Company at least equal to five times such
director’s annual retainer fee. In calculating an individual’s
equity interest, credit is given for (i) the value of actual shares
of common stock owned beneficially, (ii) the before-tax value of
all vested stock options, and (iii) the before-tax value of all
outstanding RSU awards. An annual review is conducted by our
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to assess compliance
with the guidelines. As of February 11, 2022, our directors met
their applicable ownership guidelines, or were on track to achieve
their ownership guidelines by the applicable target compliance
date.
Code of Conduct & Business Ethics/Compliance Training/Reporting
of Concerns
The Company has implemented and regularly monitors compliance with
a comprehensive Code of Conduct & Business Ethics (the “Code of
Conduct”), which applies uniformly to all directors, executive
officers and employees. Among other things, the Code of Conduct
addresses conflicts of interest, confidentiality, fair dealing,
protection and proper use of Company assets, compliance with
applicable laws (including insider trading and anti-bribery laws)
and reporting of illegal or unethical behavior. The Code of Conduct
is available on the Company’s website at
www.CIRCOR.com
under the “Investors” sub-link, and a hard copy will be provided by
the Company free of charge to any stockholder who requests it by
writing to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s corporate
headquarters.
The Company has undertaken a number of additional steps to further
the tenets of the Code of Conduct. Through a third-party provider,
the Company maintains an online training program pursuant to which
all officers and all employees with company-issued email accounts
must take a series of courses designed to demonstrate the ways in
which certain activities might run afoul of the Code of Conduct. In
addition, although all employees are encouraged to personally
report any ethical concerns without fear of retribution, the
Company, through a third-party provider, maintains a HelpLine, a
toll-free telephone and web-based system through which employees
may report concerns confidentially and anonymously (the
“HelpLine”). The HelpLine facilitates the communication of ethical
concerns and serves as the vehicle through which employees may
communicate confidentially and anonymously with (i) the Audit
Committee regarding any concerns relating to accounting or auditing
issues and (ii) the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
regarding any other concerns.
Environmental & Social Commitments
Our purpose is
Keeping Society Safe, Productive and Moving,
which is built on our vision, mission, values and Absolutes of
safety, ethics and controls. Our commitment to address the
Environmental & Social needs is reflected in our culture, and
how we build our products and conduct our business. We deliver on
that commitment for our people and our communities by investing
resources in ways that address ESG needs of our stakeholders. In
addition, in 2020, we adopted a Human Rights policy to further
codify our commitments in this area.
Products support environmental and safety
measures.
CIRCOR’s portfolio of flow and motion control products for the
world’s most severe-service and mission-critical applications —
from valves to instrumentation, actuation to pumps, motors to
regulators — make our customers’ operations safer, and reduce
waste, power consumption and emissions. Examples of the positive
social and environmental benefits our products provide
include:
Safety:
•The
bottom unheading and center feed devices from our Refinery Valves
business have directly contributed to reduced fatalities at coking
refineries, by automating processes and removing workers from
danger zones.
•Our
Aerospace & Defense team in the United Kingdom supplies the
Royal Navy and all NATO allies with submarine escape systems, the
key piece of which is a specialized calibrated valve. This valve
adapts to ambient water pressure to deliver enough pressurized air
to a submariner to allow him or her to escape from a submarine that
may be grounded on the sea-floor.
•Our
commercial aerospace teams develop and manufacture backup blowdown
systems designed to ensure landing gear doors will open in the
event that the primary hydraulic systems fail.
Health & Safety:
•Our
Zenith-brand metering pump is used to extrude the sophisticated
fibers and plastics that are used in Kevlar bulletproof vests,
surgical tubing and surgical thread.
•During
the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic, our Uxbridge site worked
with ventilator manufacturers to design, manufacture and sell a
regulator and non-return valve for ventilators needed to support
those infected with COVID-19.
Reduced environmental waste:
A line of isolation valves from the Refinery Valves business
provides an improved sealing capability as compared to legacy
technologies. This reduces the amount of positive-pressure steam
required in the process, which in turn drastically reduces both
water usage and wastewater runoff for refiners.
Emissions:
•The
Industrial group pumps team offers a smart engine cooling system,
which senses engine temperatures on commercial ships and throttles
back the cooling pumps when they are not needed. This allows
shippers to save energy and reduce emissions.
•Pumps
from the Industrial group in Germany enable a reduction in sulfur
dioxide pollutants from marine vessels in support of IMO 2020
pollutant reduction standards.
Productivity:
Our engineers work every day to enhance the efficiency of our pumps
to allow our customers to reduce their carbon footprint and drive
productivity in their facilities.
People are at our core.
We focus our energy and resources on training and development, and
our talent management practices strive to attract, engage, develop
and retain a diverse, inclusive and engaged employee
base.
Employee investments and initiatives include:
•Expanded
diversity & inclusion focus and investment, including training,
policies and employee resource groups;
•Formal
and informal mentorship programs across CIRCOR;
•Leadership
and management development programs at all levels of our management
structure;
•A
formalized rotational management training program for recent MBA
and engineering graduates to bring fresh management and technical
talent into the organization; and
•Educational
assistance programs encouraging the continuing training of our U.S.
employees by providing financial assistance for educational courses
related to their jobs and careers.
As a result of these and other initiatives, we successfully filled
50% of senior level roles in 2021 with internal
promotions.
We continue to strive to ensure the health, safety and general
well-being of our teams, including increasing onsite safety
measures, providing work from home flexibility where possible and
providing wellness seminars to employees. Actions we haven taken in
response to the pandemic’s challenges include the
following:
•Encouraging
those who are sick to stay home and continuing to use
work-from-home where necessary to minimize potential
outbreaks;
•Encouraging
vaccination and fully covering the cost of COVID-19
vaccines;
•Increasing
cleaning protocols across all locations;
•Establishing
physical distancing procedures for employees who need to be
onsite;
•Providing
additional personal protective equipment and cleaning
supplies;
•Implementing
protocols to address actual and suspected COVID-19 cases and
potential exposure;
•Utilizing
of masks to be worn as recommended by local law; and
•Expanding
our Employee Assistance Program to all of our employees
worldwide.
Commitment to safety and environmental protection in our
operations.
CIRCOR is committed to protecting the environment and the health
and safety of our employees, customers and the global communities
where we operate, and safety is one of our Absolutes. Our culture
of safety includes an ongoing training program, stand downs when
injury events occur and encouraging our employees to speak up if
they see a safety hazard. We empower our employees with measures
including our Proactive Observation Program and Stop Work
Authority. In 2021, we instituted a Safety Action Plan to reinforce
the fundamentals of safety and focus on leading indicators. By
incorporating Environmental, Health, and Safety (“EHS”) management
into our business model, CIRCOR can offer high quality,
cost-effective, reliable, safe and innovative products and services
while conserving resources for future generations.
To fulfill this commitment, we endeavor to:
•Design,
manage and operate our facilities in an environmentally responsible
and safety-conscious manner in order to maximize safety, promote
energy efficiency and manage our environmental impact throughout
the product life cycle.
•Set
objectives and targets that result in continuous improvement of our
environmental, health and safety performance. In 2021 our Total
Recordable Incident Rate was 0.83 and our Lost Time Incident Rate
was 0.48. Improvement of these metrics is a key element of our
safety initiatives in 2022.
•Train
and inform employees of their responsibilities to protect the
environment and the health and safety of themselves and their
fellow employees.
•Ensure
that leadership takes responsibility for taking immediate action to
remove safety hazards when they are identified and
reported.
•Through
continued prioritization on the adoption of our CIRCOR Operating
System (“COS”), drive improved safety metrics and develop a culture
of sustainability and safety.
CIRCOR's COS creates a disciplined culture of continuous
improvement for driving operational excellence in, among other
things, sustainability and employee health and safety. Qualitative
and quantitative performance metrics define site certification
levels to help attain and sustain a high level of environmental,
health and safety standards and culture. Through COS and our larger
EHS program, employees are trained to proactively manage all types
of risks, offer proactive suggestions and own decisions. COS
certification in this area is measured by the development of a
robust safety program and culture, management and audits,
sustainable practices and employee engagement and risk surveys. As
sites move from bronze to silver and then ultimately to a gold
certification level, their rigor and performance must also
improve.
CIRCOR derives all of its energy from the local electricity and
natural gas grids. Some sites have gas-fueled electricity
generators that are used only in the case of local power outage. We
encourage the use of cleaner burning natural gas to diesel or
gasoline for emergency and testing protocols. Furthermore, we do
not maintain a significant number of fleet vehicles. As a result of
the foregoing, our use of natural gas and other fossil fuels is
limited and associated greenhouse gas emissions are
limited.
Corporate Political Contributions
CIRCOR does not use corporate funds to make contributions to
political parties or candidates, whether federal, state or local.
Consistent with this approach, CIRCOR does not direct corporate
funds to political organizations (that is, organizations organized
under Section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code) or for
communications to support or oppose specific political candidates
(such as through electioneering communications or other corporate
independent expenditures).
We do not have a company-sponsored Political Action Committee. We
encourage employees to be engaged in their communities and value
the right and responsibility of employees to participate as private
citizens in political and governmental affairs. Any decisions about
whether to be involved in such affairs is personal and
voluntary.
CIRCOR is a member of various organizations, including industry
groups and trade associations, which further our business, economic
and community interests. These groups help keep the Company
informed on developments and trends in the manufacturing industry
and issues important to us as a global company and employer. These
organizations may support their
member companies through educational forums, political activities
and advocacy to advance issues of common concern to the
manufacturing industry or the business community at
large.
Related Party Transactions
The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a Related Party
Transactions Policy that requires that any proposed transaction
involving the Company or a subsidiary of the Company in which a
director or executive officer has direct economic or beneficial
interest shall be reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee of
the Board.
Since the beginning of Fiscal Year 2021, the Company was not a
party to any transaction in which the amount involved exceeded
$120,000 and in which an executive officer, director, director
nominee or 5% stockholder (or their immediate family members) had a
material direct or indirect interest, and no such person was
indebted to the Company.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
The members of the Compensation Committee in Fiscal Year 2021 were
Mr. Dietz, Ms. Donikowski, Mr. Lisman, Mr. Wilver and Mr.
O’Donnell, with Mr. Wilver and Mr. Dietz retiring from the Board
effective April 30, 2021 and September 30, 2021, respectively. None
of the Company’s executive officers serves as a member of the Board
or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more of its
executive officers serving as a member of the Company’s
Compensation Committee. In addition, none of the Company’s
executive officers serves as a member of the compensation committee
of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers
serving as a member of the Board.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of September 1, 2022,
by:
•all
persons known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common
stock;
•each
of our current directors;
•our
NEOs included in the Summary Compensation Table appearing in this
Proxy Statement; and
•all
current directors and executive officers as a group.
The number of shares beneficially owned by each stockholder is
determined under rules issued by the SEC and includes voting or
investment power with respect to securities. Under these rules,
beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual
or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power and
includes any shares as to which the individual or entity has the
right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days after
September 1, 2022, through the exercise of any stock option, RSU or
other right. The inclusion in this Proxy Statement of such shares,
however, does not constitute an admission that the named
stockholder is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of such
shares. As of the record date of August 22, 2022, a total of
20,361,631 shares of our common stock were
outstanding.
Unless otherwise indicated below, to our knowledge, all persons
listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to
their shares of common stock except, to the extent authority is
shared by spouses under applicable law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common
Stock Beneficially Owned
|
Name of Beneficial Owner(1)
|
Number(2)
|
Percent(2)
|
BlackRock, Inc.(3)
|
3,154,113 |
|
15.5 |
% |
|
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(4)
|
2,836,534 |
|
13.9 |
% |
|
The Vanguard Group(5)
|
1,797,708 |
|
8.8 |
% |
|
Gabelli Entities(6)
|
1,592,907 |
|
7.8 |
% |
|
Royce & Associates, LP(7)
|
1,220,740 |
|
6.0 |
% |
|
Segall Bryant & Hamill, LLCs(8)
|
1,323,695 |
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Buckhout(9)
|
86,305 |
|
* |
|
Samuel R. Chapin |
10,994 |
|
* |
|
Tina Donikowski |
15,396 |
|
* |
|
Arthur L George, Jr.s(10)
|
— |
|
* |
|
Abhishek Khandelwal(11)
|
10,489 |
|
* |
|
Bruce Lisman |
8,797 |
|
* |
|
Helmuth Ludwig |
27,120 |
|
* |
|
Sumit Mehrotra(12)
|
19,832 |
|
* |
|
Tony Najjar |
31,493 |
|
* |
|
John (Andy) O'Donnell |
35,368 |
|
* |
|
Arjun Sharma |
65,013 |
|
* |
|
Jill D. Smith |
7,871 |
|
* |
|
Jessica W. Wenzell |
1,138 |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
All current executive officers and directors as a group
(ten)(13)
|
203,190 |
|
1.0 |
% |
|
*
Less than 1%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The address of each stockholder in the table is c/o CIRCOR
International, Inc., 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 200, Burlington, MA
01803, except that the address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd
Street, New York, NY 10055; the address of T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc. is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202; the
address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA
19355; the address of the Gabelli Entities (as defined in Footnote
6) is One Corporate Center, Rye, NY 10580; ; the address of Royce
& Associates is 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY
10151. |
(2) |
The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding used in
calculating the percentage for each listed person and the directors
and executive officers as a group includes the number of shares of
Common Stock underlying stock options held by such person or group
that are exercisable, and RSUs that vest within 60 days after March
31, 2022, but excludes shares of Common Stock underlying stock
options or RSUs held by any other person. Amounts in the table
include: 10,107 options for Mr. Najjar and 22,389 options for Mr.
Sharma. |
(3) |
The information is based on a Schedule 13F-HR filed with the SEC on
August 12, 2022 on behalf of BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”).
According to the filing, BlackRock has sole investment discretion
over 3,154,113 shares and sole voting authority over 3,128,587
shares. The firm does not have the authority to vote 25,526 of the
reported shares. |
(4) |
This information is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
August 10, 2022, on behalf of T. Rowe Price Investment Management,
Inc. (“Price Investment”) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund,
Inc. (“T. Rowe Small Cap”) and a Form 13G/A filed with the SEC on
August 10, 2022, on behalf of on behalf of T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc. (“Price Associates”). According to the filings,
Price Investment has sole dispositive power over 2,831,271 shares
and sole voting authority over 969,248 shares. T. Rowe Small Cap
has sole voting authority over 1,839,666 shares. Price Associates
has sole dispositive power and sole voting authority over 5,263
shares. Price Investment and Price Associates do not serve as
custodians of the assets of any of their clients; in each instance,
only the client or the client’s custodian or trustee bank has the
right to receive dividends paid with respect to, and proceeds from
the sale of, such securities. The ultimate power to direct the
receipt of dividends paid with respect to, and the proceeds from
the sale of, such securities, is vested in the individual and
institutional clients which Price Investment and Price Associates
serves as an investment adviser. Any and all discretionary
authority which has been delegated to Price Investment and Price
Associates may be revoked in whole or in part at any time. Not more
than 5% of the class of such securities is owned by any one client
subject to the investment advice of Price Investment and Price
Associates. With respect to securities owned by any one of the
registered investment companies sponsored by Price Investment or
Price Associates which it also serves as investment adviser (the
“T. Rowe Price Funds”), only the custodian for each of such T. Rowe
Price Funds has the right to receive dividends paid with respect
to, and proceeds from the sale of, such securities. No other person
is known to have such right, except that the shareholders of each
such T. Rowe Price Fund participate proportionately in any
dividends and distributions so paid.
|
(5) |
The information is based on a Schedule 13F-HR/a filed with the SEC
on August 12, 2022 on behalf of The Vanguard Group. According to
the filing, The Vanguard Group has sole investment discretion over
1,797,708 shares, and shared voting authority over 34,607 shares.
The firm does not have the authority to vote 1,763,101 of the
reported shares. |
(6) |
The information is based on an amended Schedule 13D filed with the
SEC on August 11, 2022, on behalf of Mario J. Gabelli and various
entities which Mr. Gabelli directly or indirectly controls or for
which he acts as chief investment officer including, but not
limited to, Gabelli Funds, LLC, GAMCO Asset Management Inc.,
Gabelli & Company Investment Advisors, Inc., Teton Advisors,
Inc., GGCP, Inc., GAMCO Investors, Inc., and Associated Capital
Group, Inc. (collectively, the “Gabelli Entities”). According to
the amended Schedule 13D, the Gabelli Entities engage in various
aspects of the securities business, primarily as investment
advisors to institutional and individual clients, including
registered investment companies and pension plans, and as general
partners (or the equivalent of) in private investment partnerships
or private funds and as a registered broker-dealer. Certain of the
Gabelli Entities may also make investments for their own accounts.
According to the amended Schedule 13D, Gabelli Funds, LLC, GAMCO
Asset Management Inc. and Teton Advisors, Inc. beneficially owned
591,353, 1,269,884 and 74,266 shares, respectively. Gabelli &
Company Investment Advisers, Inc. and the Gabelli Foundation, Inc.
beneficially owned 58,953 and 26,000 shares, respectively. Mr.
Gabelli, GAMCO Investors, Inc., GGCP, Inc. and Associated Capital
Group, Inc. are deemed to beneficially own the shares owned
beneficially by each of the Gabelli Entities. Subject to certain
limitations, each of the Gabelli Entities has sole dispositive and
voting power, either for its own benefit or for the benefit of its
investment clients or partners, as the case may be, in the shares
beneficially owned by such entity, except that (i) GAMCO Asset
Management Inc. does not have the authority to vote 26,100 of the
reported shares, (ii) Gabelli Funds, LLC has sole dispositive and
voting power with respect to the shares of the Company held by the
various funds so long as the aggregate voting interest of all joint
filers does not exceed 25% of their total voting interest in the
Company and, in that event, the proxy voting committee of each such
fund shall respectively vote that fund's shares, (iii) at any time,
the proxy voting committee of each such fund may exercise in its
sole discretion the entire voting power with respect to the shares
held by such fund under special circumstances such as regulatory
considerations, and (iv) the power of Mr. Gabelli, Associated
Capital Group, Inc., GAMCO Investors, Inc., and GGCP, Inc. is
indirect with respect to shares beneficially owned directly by
other Gabelli Entities. |
(7) |
The information is based on the Schedule 13F-HR filed with the SEC
on August 4, 2022 on behalf of Royce & Associates LP ("Royce
Associates"). According to the filing, Royce Associates has sole
investment discretion and and sole voting authority over 1,220,740
shares. |
(8) |
The information is based on a Form 13F-HR filed with the SEC on
August 15, 2022 on behalf of Segall Bryant & Hamill, LLC.
According to the filing, Segall Bryant & Hamill has sole voting
authority over 1,064,830 shares. The firm does not have the
authority to vote 258,865 of the reported shares. |
(9) |
Mr. Buckhout terminated his employment with the Company on January
19, 2022 and information provided is as of that date. |
(10) |
Arthur L. George, Jr. joined the Board of Directors on January 26,
2022 and resigned on July 22, 2022, due to health
reasons. |
(11) |
Mr. Khandelwal terminated his employment with the Company on
December 31, 2021, and information provided is as of that
date. |
(12) |
Mr. Mehrotra terminated his employment with the Company on July 5,
2021, and information provided is as of that date. |
(13) |
Includes 33,984 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise
of outstanding stock options that will be exercisable within 60
days after March 31, 2022. |
MANAGEMENT
Our executive officers and key employees, and their respective ages
and positions, as of August 31, 2022, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Tony Najjar
|
61 |
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Arjun ("AJ") Sharma
|
45 |
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Business
Development |
Jessica Wenzell |
47 |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary and Chief
People Officer |
Amit Goel |
45 |
Vice President, Finance, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer |
Tanya Dawkins
|
61 |
Vice President, Corporate Treasurer
|
Tony Najjar.
Mr. Najjar was named Chief Operating Officer and Interim President
and Chief Executive Officer effective January 19, 2022, and
President and Chief Executive Officer on August 10, 2022. He
previously served as the President, Aerospace and Defense Group
from February 2018 through January 2022. He served as Vice
President, Aerospace and Defense in the Advance Flow Solutions
Group from October 2016 to February 2018 and Vice President, Sales
& Marketing, Aerospace and Defense Group, from April 2015 to
October 2016. Before joining CIRCOR, Mr. Najjar served as Programs
Manager, Business Development and Mergers & Acquisitions at
Rockwell Collins, a multinational manufacturing company, from
October 2011 to April 2015. He has spent nearly 36 years in the
aerospace and defense industry in engineering, sales, and general
management roles, including leadership positions at Rockwell
Collins and Kaiser Aerospace. Mr. Najjar holds both a bachelor's
degree and a Master of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering
from Oklahoma State University and an MBA from Pepperdine
University.
Arjun ("AJ") Sharma.
Mr. Sharma was appointed as our Interim Chief Financial Officer
effective January 1, 2022, and continues to serve as our Senior
Vice President, Business Development, a position he has held since
2009, overseeing the Company’s mergers and acquisitions and
strategic planning functions. On August 10, 2022, he was appointed
Chief Financial Officer, while retaining his oversight of the
business development function. Prior to joining CIRCOR,
Mr. Sharma served as managing director at Global Equity
Partners, a venture capital and strategy consulting firm, from
January 2009 to September 2009, where he was responsible for
executing equity investments and leading client engagements on
acquisitions, divestitures, and growth strategy. From 2007 to 2008,
he was Director of Mergers and Acquisitions at Textron Inc., a
multi-industry company with a global network of aircraft, defense,
industrial and finance businesses, where he was responsible for
developing the company’s M&A strategy and leading acquisition
and divestiture transactions. From 2002 to 2007, Mr. Sharma
held various positions of increasing responsibility at SPX
Corporation, a Fortune 500 multi-industry company, culminating in
his appointment as Director of Corporate Development. Mr. Sharma
holds a Master of Science degree in Finance from Drexel University
and a Bachelor of Commerce degree from Delhi University. Mr. Sharma
is a graduate of the PLD program at Harvard Business
School.
Jessica Wenzell.
Ms. Wenzell was appointed as Chief People Officer effective
November 15, 2021 and continues to serve as our Senior Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary, roles she has held since
joining CIRCOR in September 2020. Prior to joining CIRCOR, Ms.
Wenzell served in executive roles of increasing responsibility at
General Electric Company for over 14 years. From January 2018 to
August 2020, she was GE’s Executive Counsel – Strategic
Transactions, leading cross-functional, legal entity carve-out
activities for divestitures. Her previous roles at GE included
Executive Counsel – Indirect Sourcing & Properties (August 2017
to March 2018); Executive Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer for GE
Oil & Gas (August 2013 to July 2017); and General Counsel for
GE Measurement & Control (2010 to 2013). Ms. Wenzell began her
career at Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP in the
Corporate & Securities Practice Group. She received her
Bachelor’s degree in Political Science from the University of
California, San Diego and her J.D. from the University of
California, Hastings College of the Law, San
Francisco.
Amit Goel.
Mr. Goel joined CIRCOR as Vice President, Finance, Corporate
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer in September 2020. Prior to
joining CIRCOR, Mr. Goel served in roles of increasing
responsibility at Ernst & Young, LLP for over 17 years. From
July 2017 to September 2020, he was a Partner in the Firm's
National Accounting Office. His previous roles at EY included Audit
Partner (July 2013 to June 2017), Senior Manager of Audit Services
(October 2010 to June 2013); Senior to Manager, Audit Services
(September 2003 to September 2010), Mr. Goel is a Certified Public
Accountant, a Chartered Financial Analyst and a Chartered
Accountant. He received his Bachelor of Commerce from Sydenham
College of Commerce & Economics from Mumbai University in
India. On August 22, 2022, Mr. Goel notified the Company of his
intention to resign effective September 9, 2022.
Tanya Dawkins.
Ms. Dawkins has served as Vice President, Corporate Treasurer since
March 2018. She previously served as Senior Director, Corporate
Treasurer from September 2015 to March 2018. From 2001 to September
2015, Ms. Dawkins held a variety of senior finance positions at
CIRCOR, including Global Treasury Manager, External Reporting
Manager, and Corporate Accounting Manager. Prior to joining
CIRCOR, Ms. Dawkins served as Director of Finance for GenRad
Corporation (now part of Teradyne). Ms. Dawkins previously had
spent 10 years at Digital Equipment Corporation in a variety of
senior finance positions. She is a Certified Treasury
Professional and holds a Bachelor of Business Administration in
Finance from the University of Texas at Austin, and an MBA from
Simmons Graduate School of Management.
Under the By-Laws, each of the officers of the Company holds office
until the regular annual meeting of the Board of Directors
following the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or
her successor is elected and qualified or until his or her earlier
death, resignation or removal.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Overview
In this section, we describe the executive compensation program for
our Named Executive Officers (the “NEOs”). Our intent is to help
stockholders understand the framework of our overall program, its
objectives and the rationale for the Compensation Committee’s
compensation decisions. Our NEOs for Fiscal Year 2021 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer |
Position During Fiscal Year 2021 |
Scott Buckhout
(1)
|
President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) |
Abhishek Khandelwal
(2)
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) |
Tony Najjar
(3)
|
President, Aerospace and Defense Group |
Arjun Sharma
(4)
|
Senior Vice President, Business Development |
Jessica Wenzell
(5)
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary & Chief
People Officer |
Sumit Mehrotra
(6)
|
Former President, Industrial Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Buckhout terminated employment with CIRCOR on January 19,
2022. |
(2) |
Mr. Khandelwal terminated employment with CIRCOR on December 31,
2021. |
(3) |
Mr. Najjar was named Chief Operating Officer and Interim President
and Chief Executive Officer effective January 19, 2022 in
connection with Mr. Buckhout's departure and is no longer serving
in the role of President, Aerospace and Defense Group. He was
appointed President and Chief Executive Officer on August 10,
2022. |
(4) |
Mr. Sharma was appointed as our interim Chief Financial Officer
effective January 1, 2022 and continues to serve as our Senior Vice
President, Business Development. Mr. Sharma was appointed Chief
Financial Officer on August 10, 2022. |
(5) |
Ms. Wenzell was appointed as our Chief People Officer effective
November 15, 2021 and continues to serve as our Senior Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary |
(6) |
Mr. Mehrotra terminated employment with CIRCOR on July 5,
2021. |
In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, in certain cases, we
refer to Messrs. Buckhout, Khandelwal, and Sharma and Ms. Wenzell
as “Corporate NEOs” and Messrs. Najjar and Mehrotra as “Group
NEOs.”
Executive Summary
Our Business: 2021 Performance Overview
CIRCOR is a leading provider of severe service and mission critical
flow and motion control solutions and other highly engineered
products for the Industrial and Aerospace & Defense markets
that include recognized, market-leading brands. We have a global
presence with approximately 3,100 employees worldwide and customers
in approximately 100 countries. We operate 21 major manufacturing
facilities located in North America, Western Europe, Morocco, China
and India. We sell our products directly to end-user customers and
original equipment manufacturers, as well as through Engineering,
Procurement and Construction companies and our channel partner
network. The Company has two reportable business segments: the
Industrial segment (“Industrial Group”) and the Aerospace &
Defense segment (“Aerospace & Defense Group” or “A&D
Group”).
In 2021 our business continued to feel the impact of the COVID-19
pandemic. Throughout this continued time of uncertainty, the
Company’s top priority remains the health and safety of our
employees, customers, and suppliers. As the COVID-19 pandemic
evolves, we continue to implement appropriate measures to ensure
our employees around the world have the necessary protection and
our business continues to operate with as little disruption as
possible. We believe that these actions along with the Company’s
continued focus on new product innovation, cost productivity and
the CIRCOR Operating System serve to best position the Company for
potential end market recovery across our Industrial and Aerospace
& Defense segments.
We continue to implement actions to mitigate the impact from lower
demand and an increasingly competitive environment. In addition, we
are investing in products and technologies designed to help solve
our customers’ most difficult problems. We intend to further
simplify CIRCOR by standardizing technology, consolidating
suppliers and achieving world class operational excellence.
Attracting and retaining talented personnel remains an essential
underpinning to the enhancement of our global sales, operations,
product management and engineering organizations.
2021 Financial Achievements (in thousands, except
percentages)
The following table highlights certain measures that serve as our
compensation performance metrics for our performance-based
compensation and the level of achievement of these metrics in
2021:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Plan Metrics
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan Metrics
|
|
Net Sales
|
Adjusted Operating Income(1)
|
Adjusted Working Capital % of Sales(2)
|
Free Cash Flow(3)
|
Adjusted Operating Margin(4)
|
Adjusted Measurement Cash Flow(5)
|
Relative Total Shareholder Return(6)
|
CIRCOR (overall including Corporate expenses)(7)
|
N/A |
$51.4 |
N/A |
$(3.9) |
|
|
see note (6) |
Aerospace & Defense Group
|
$250.1 |
$55.3 |
37.8% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Industrial Group(8)
|
$415.0 |
$23.2 |
19.0% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Adjusted Operating Income (“AOI”), a non-GAAP measure, is defined
as GAAP operating income excluding intangible amortization and
amortization of fair value step-ups of inventory and fixed assets
from acquisitions completed after December 31, 2011, the impact of
restructuring-related inventory write-offs, impairment charges and
special charges or gains. |
(2) |
"Adjusted Working Capital % of Sales" or "(AWC % of Sales": a
non-GAAP measure, is defined as the sum of Adjusted Working Capital
balances at year-end divided by Net Sales. “Adjusted Working
Capital” includes the following accounts: Trade Accounts
Receivable, Unbilled Receivables (short and long term), Inventory,
Trade Accounts Payable, Customer Advances (short and long term),
and Deferred Revenue.
|
(3) |
Free Cash Flow, a non-GAAP financial measure calculated by
subtracting GAAP capital expenditures, net of proceeds from asset
sales, from GAAP operating cash flow. |
(4) |
Adjusted Operating Margin (“AOM”), a non-GAAP measure, is defined
as Adjusted Operating Income divided by Net Sales. Adjusted
Operating Income is defined as GAAP operating income excluding
intangible amortization and amortization of fair value step-ups of
inventory and fixed assets from acquisitions completed after
December 31, 2011, the impact of restructuring-related inventory
write-offs, impairment charges and special charges or
gains. |
(5) |
“Adjusted Measurement Cash Flow” or “Adjusted MCF” with respect to
a fiscal year is calculated by adding the Company’s cash provided
by operating businesses less Corporate General and Administrative
spend for that year. Specifically, Adjusted MCF excludes cash flows
from income taxes, corporate special charges, and restructuring
costs but includes interest expense. |
(6) |
“Relative Total Shareholder Return” or “Relative TSR” is calculated
by ranking the Company and a list of specified peer companies
within the S&P 600 SmallCap Industrial Index from highest to
lowest according to their respective TSR and expressing the
Company's performance as its corresponding percentile within the
group of companies. Results are not yet reportable as the
applicable, three-year period ends in 2024.
|
(7) |
Corporate refers to the group of employees that provides services
to the Aerospace & Defense Group and the Industrial Group or
support management of Company-wide functions. |
(8) |
For purposes of calculating incentive compensation in the
Industrial Group, Refinery Valves is excluded. |
Key Compensation Actions Taken During 2021
The Company’s financial results and the overall business
environment were considered when determining compensation paid for
2021. Please see
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal Year 2021
for a more detailed description of the Company’s financial
results.
2021 was, in many respects, a step towards a more stable and
predictable business environment following a difficult year in 2020
that was dominated by reaction to the impact of the COVID-19
pandemic to our business. Compensation actions taken by the
Compensation Committee in 2021 reflected this return to
forward-looking strategy, including the following:
•Return
to Standard Compensation Programs and Process:
Following the extraordinary
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic to our business in 2020 and the
corresponding actions the Compensation Committee took to adjust
compensation practices and costs, in 2021 we returned to our
typical cadence of determination of annual incentive awards based
on pre-established business goals and metrics approved by the
Compensation Committee.
•Revised
Metric for Short-Term Incentives:
The Compensation Committee determined that Adjusted Working Capital
% of Sales would replace the free cash flow metric previously used
as one of the Short-Term Incentive Plan measures for Group NEOs.
This change was made to eliminate overlap with another of the
Short-Term Incentive Plan measures, AOI.
•New
Metric for Long-Term Incentives:
The Compensation Committee determined that a change to the
structure of performance-based stock awards would further align NEO
compensation to stockholder interest. The Compensation Committee
also considered the difficulty of setting multi-year financial
goals in
the current business environment. Effective with the 2021 annual
Long-Term Incentive ("LTI") award, the performance metric for the
performance-based portion of NEO awards is Relative TSR, which
links the number of shares that our NEOs earn to the Company’s TSR
performance relative to the TSR of peer industrial companies, as
described more fully below under
2021 Long-Term Incentive.
•New
Compensation Consultant:
As part of its governance routine, the Compensation Committee
conducted a comprehensive review of independent compensation
consultants that could assist the Committee in fulfilling its
responsibilities. As a result of its review, the Compensation
Committee selected Semler Brossy as its independent consultant
effective October 2021, replacing its former consultant, Pearl
Meyer.
•Updated
Peer Group:
The Compensation Committee conducted its annual review of the group
of peer companies that we compare our compensation practices to. As
a result of its review and in order to ensure that the peer group
continues to be comprised of similarly sized companies that align
to our industry, changes were made to five of the seventeen
companies in our peer group referenced for fiscal 2021. The updated
peer group will be referenced for 2022 compensation
decisions.
•Retention
Incentives for Certain NEOs:
In connection with Mr. Khandelwal's termination of employment in
December 2021, the Compensation Committee approved retention awards
to Mr. Sharma and Ms. Wenzell, each of whom are integral to our
financial reporting, disclosure and corporate governance processes.
These awards were made to retain experienced executives to provide
leadership for these important functions through the end of 2022
while we searched for a new leader for the finance
function.
Following the completion of 2021, our Compensation Committee made
the following decisions with respect to incentive-based
compensation based on 2021 performance results:
•Annual
Short-Term Incentives:
The 2021 Short-Term Incentive Plan (“2021 STI Plan”) payouts for
NEOs were determined based on the Company's performance on the
metrics approved by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of
2021. The Compensation Committee did not use its discretion to
modify any of the performance results when determining payouts,
however, the Committee determined it is in the best interest of the
Company to exercise the Committee’s discretion to adjust the
amounts earned by Mr. Buckhout and Mr. Mehrotra under the 2021 STI
Plan to zero based on the significant accounting irregularities
discovered by the Company with respect to the Pipeline Engineering
business unit. As announced in the Form 8-K filed on March 14,
2022, the Pipeline Engineering accounting irregularities occurred
over multiple years under the leadership of Messrs. Buckhout and
Mehrotra and impacted the actual performance of the STI financial
metrics, the inability to rely on the Company’s prior financial
statements due to the misstatements, and led to the restatement of
three years of the Company’s financial results. The 2021 STI Plan
results for our NEOs are set forth below under
2021 Short-Term Incentive Plan Results.
•Outstanding
Long-Term Incentives:
While a certain portion of our LTI awards were significantly
impacted by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on performance
results, the Compensation Committee did not use its discretion to
modify any of the performance results to reflect COVID-19 business
impact when determining the number of earned shares under our
performance-based stock awards. However, the Committee did consider
the impact of the Pipeline Engineering matters on the three-year
performance results of the 2019 performance award and used its
discretion to reduce the number of shares vesting in the final
tranche of our 2019 performance awards to zero. The second tranche
of our 2020 performance awards earned 0% of target, as set forth
below under
Prior Year PSU Results.
The vesting of our 2021 performances awards will be determined
following the completion of the performance period in
2024.
•Pipeline
Engineering:
Based on the significant accounting irregularities discovered by
the Company with respect to the its Pipeline Engineering business
unit as announced via Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2022, which
occurred over multiple years under the leadership of Messrs.
Buckhout and Mehrotra, the impacts thereof on actual performance of
the STI financial metrics, the inability to rely on the Company’s
prior financial statements due to the misstatements, and the
impending restatement of the Company’s financial results, the
Committee determined it is in the best interest of the Company to
exercise the Committee’s discretion to adjust the amounts earned by
Mr. Buckhout and Mr. Mehrotra under the 2021 STI Plan to
zero.
2021 Stockholder Engagement, Say-on-Pay Results & Program
Changes
The Company regularly evaluates its compensation programs and
considers the results of its most recent stockholder advisory vote
on executive compensation (“say-on-pay”), as well as feedback
received directly from stockholders through our ongoing
engagement.
At the May 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, we received
say-on-pay support of approximately 97%. This result indicated
continued support for the Company’s executive compensation program.
Highlights of our executive compensation program
include:
•Short-term
incentive plans for business groups aligned to critical
metrics.
The short-term incentive plan is designed to ensure appropriate
focus on the respective business groups as well as overall
corporate performance. Specifically, Group NEO bonuses are based on
70% Group results and 30% Company-wide metrics, and Corporate NEO
bonuses are based 60% on the incentive scores of the A&D and
Industrial Groups and 40% based on Company-wide metrics. As such,
for our 2021 STI Plan, Group Presidents in A&D and Industrial
Groups were measured on their group-specific performance metrics
based 35% on Group AOI, 30% on CIRCOR AOI, 20% on Group Adjusted
Working Capital % of Sales and 15% on Group Net Sales. Corporate
NEOs were measured on the incentive scores of the Aerospace &
Defense Group and Industrial Groups excluding the impact of CIRCOR
AOI on Group scores, each counting for 30% of the total incentive
score, CIRCOR AOI (30% of score) and CIRCOR Free Cash Flow (10% of
the score).
•Equity
vehicle mix for NEOs aligned with long-term
objectives.
2021 LTI awards were a mix of 50% performance-based restricted
stock units (“PSUs”) and 50% restricted stock units (“RSUs”). We
use an equal mix of PSUs and RSUs to provide both long-term
performance and long-term retention incentives to our NEOs in
support of our business strategy.
•TSR
performance metric for long-term awards.
For 2021 LTI awards, we replaced the previous AOM and Adjusted
Measurement Cash Flow metrics used for our PSUs with a three-year
Relative TSR metric.
The Compensation Committee changed to a Relative TSR metric to more
closely align management and stockholder interests by incorporating
another metric of importance to stockholders and to remove some of
the difficulty of setting multi-year financial goals in a still
stabilizing market.
•Replenishment
of equity plan share pool.
At our 2021 annual meeting, stockholders approved the replenishment
of our share reserve under our 2019 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan, which is the primary vehicle that we use to provide long-term
incentive awards to our employees, including our NEOs.
Going forward, we plan to continue to engage with our stockholders
and consider their perspectives regarding compensation and
governance matters.
CEO Pay At-A-Glance (Target v. Realized)
The chart below shows target and realized compensation for Mr.
Buckhout. Target total direct compensation represents base salary,
target annual bonus, and target annual LTI awards. Realized
compensation represents base salary, annual bonus actually paid in
cash, and the value realized upon the exercise of stock options or
vesting of PSUs or RSUs, including RSUs granted under our
Management Stock Purchase Plan during each year. Realized
compensation has trailed target total direct compensation over the
prior three years, reflecting the rigor of our goal-setting process
for annual bonus and PSU awards and the pay for performance nature
of our overall executive compensation program.
|
|
|
Mr. Buckhout's 2021 compensation includes $1,137,758 related to the
vesting of a special RSU award issued on March 4, 2020, for
retention purposes. His 2021 STI amount earned was adjusted to
zero, as further discussed herein. |
Good Compensation Governance
The Compensation Committee continually evaluates the Company's
compensation policies and practices to ensure that they are
consistent with good governance principles. Below are highlights of
what we do and what we do not do:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What We Do |
What We Do Not Do |
ü |
We place the majority of weight on performance-based, at-risk, and
long-term compensation. |
X |
We do not provide any compensation-related tax gross-ups (except in
connection with relocation expenses). |
ü |
We deliver rewards that are based on achieving long-term objectives
and the creation of stockholder value. |
X |
We do not provide significant perquisites. |
ü |
We target total direct compensation at approximately the market
median for our peer group. |
X |
We do not allow officers or directors to hedge Company
stock. |
ü |
We maintain stock ownership guidelines for our directors and
executives, including our CEO and other NEOs. |
X |
We do not allow officers or directors to pledge Company
stock. |
ü |
We have “double-trigger” change in control vesting of cash
severance payments and new equity awards. |
X |
We do not reprice or replace out-of-the-money stock options without
stockholder approval. |
ü |
Our Compensation Committee seeks advice from an independent
compensation consultant. |
X |
We do not have contracts that guarantee employment with any
executive (all employment is terminable-at-will). |
ü |
We maintain a clawback policy with respect to incentive-based cash
and equity compensation. |
|
|
ü |
We cap annual bonus payouts to eliminate potential windfalls for
executives. |
|
|
ü |
We cap the vesting value of TSR-based PSUs to eliminate potential
windfalls for executives. |
|
|
ü |
We encourage executives to invest their cash incentives in the
Company through our Management Stock Purchase Plan
(MSPP). |
|
|
What Guides Our Program
Our Compensation Guiding Principles
The philosophy underlying our executive compensation program is to
attract, retain and motivate highly qualified and talented
executives and reward the achievement of specific annual, long-term
and strategic goals that promote the profitable growth of the
Company and enhance stockholder value. To this end, the following
principles guide the structure of our program:
•Link
to business priorities and performance.
A significant portion of an executive’s total compensation should
be “at risk,” subject to the attainment of certain specific and
measurable performance goals and objectives. We select performance
metrics that are most directly tied to the creation of enterprise
value and that our management team can meaningfully influence. As
performance goals are met or exceeded, executives are rewarded
commensurately. Conversely, if goals are not met, actual earned
compensation will be lower than target compensation.
•Alignment
of executives with stockholders' interests.
Our compensation program should encourage our executives to hold a
meaningful amount of equity. In addition, we believe compensation
to our executives should be based on a balance of short- and
long-term financial performance factors. This approach also
supports our retention strategy and promotes our
achievement-oriented culture.
•Competitiveness
of Pay Position.
Target total direct compensation should be competitive with that
being offered to individuals holding comparable positions at other
public companies with which we compete for executive talent. In
general, we position target total direct compensation for our NEOs,
as well as each element of total target compensation, to be at or
around the median target compensation for executives with similar
positions at our peer group companies.
•Maintenance
of Governance Standards.
We believe that maintaining best-practice executive compensation
governance standards is in the best interests of our stockholders
and executives and critical to the ability to manage
risk.
Elements of Compensation
Our compensation philosophy is supported by the following elements
of compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay Element |
How It’s Paid |
What It Does |
How It Links to Performance |
Base Salary |
Cash
(Fixed) |
Provides a competitive, fixed rate of pay relative to similar
positions in the market and enables the Company to attract and
retain critical executive talent
|
Based on job scope, level of responsibilities, individual
performance, experience, tenure and market levels
|
Short-Term Incentive Plan |
Cash
(At-Risk) |
Focuses executives on achieving annual financial and strategic
goals that enhance long-term stockholder value |
Tied to achievement of targets relating to AOI, Free Cash Flow,
Working Capital and Net Sales
No formulaic payouts for performance below threshold
Award capped at 300% of target value
|
Long-Term Incentive (LTI) Plan |
PSUs |
Provides incentives for executives to execute on longer-term goals
that will increase stockholder returns |
Tied to achievement of Relative TSR when compared to peer
industrial companies
Vesting follows three-year period based on performance
results
Number of shares is capped at 200% of target (100% of target if TSR
is negative)
|
RSUs |
Supports leadership retention strategy |
Annual vesting over a three-year period
•Paid
in CIRCOR shares at vesting
|
|
|
|
How We Further Foster Stock Ownership and Strengthen Alignment with
Stockholders
In order to more closely align the interests of our executives with
those of our stockholders, our NEOs are also eligible to
participate in the MSPP, which is designed to encourage our NEOs to
invest up to 100% of their own earned incentive compensation in
equity of the Company.
The Compensation Committee approves the participants in the MSPP.
Participants are entitled to purchase RSUs under the MSPP at a
discount of 33% from the fair market value of the Company’s Common
Stock on the annual grant date using all or a portion of their
pre-tax, short-term incentive award. RSUs purchased under the MSPP
vest in whole after a three-year period. Any NEO who resigns from
the Company (other than due to retirement) prior to vesting may
lose the benefits associated with the discounted purchase price of
RSUs purchased under the MSPP, as well as any further appreciation
in stock price and accrued dividends associated with such
RSUs.
|
Total Pay Mix at Target
A significant portion of our NEOs' compensation is designed “at
risk,” subject to the attainment of specific and measurable
performance goals and objectives or subject to the valuation of the
Company’s stock price. For example, as shown in the diagram below,
82% of the target total direct compensation of our CEO and 63% of
the target total direct compensation of our other NEOs serving at
year-end is allocated to a combination of PSUs, RSUs and target
bonus; and therefore, based on achieving financial and operating
metrics or based on the valuation of the Company's stock
price.
The above diagram reflects annualized target total direct
compensation as of year-end 2021, which we define to include
annualized base salaries, target short-term incentive amounts and
the target LTI award amounts used to determine the number of target
shares underlying PSU and RSU awards.
The Decision-Making Process
The Role of the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee oversees the executive compensation
program for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee is comprised of
independent, non-employee members of the Board. The Committee works
very closely with its independent consultant and management to
examine the effectiveness of the Company's executive compensation
program throughout the year. Attracting and retaining a team of
outstanding executives with complementary skills is one of the
Company’s priorities.
When making decisions regarding the compensation of the NEOs, the
Compensation Committee considers information from a variety of
sources. The Compensation Committee also regularly assesses our
incentive plan measures in light of current business context,
relevance to stockholders and alignment with peer company
practices. The Compensation Committee analyzes both individual
elements, total compensation and pay mix for each of the NEOs.
While actual compensation reflects the Company’s performance, the
Company’s goal is for total target compensation, as well as each
element of total target compensation, to be at or around the median
target compensation for executives with similar positions at our
peer group companies (described in further detail below). The
Compensation Committee also incorporates flexibility into its
compensation programs and into the assessment process to respond to
changing business needs, and to take into consideration individual
performance, including the relative complexity and strategic
importance of specific roles.
In setting meaningful performance goals for our STI Plan, the
Compensation Committee carefully considers a number of factors,
including the general economic and industry climate, anticipated
customer spending, projected revenue from current contracts and
renewals and deals in the pipeline. Based on these factors, a range
of performance scenarios is developed. Goals are then set at the
threshold, target and maximum performance levels with the target
goals aligning with the Company’s operating plan. CIRCOR strives
for alignment between our STI Plan performance targets and our
operating plan and the financial guidance we provide
externally. In setting performance goals for our LTI Plan, the
Compensation Committee considers the same factors as for the STI
Plan but over a multi-year timeframe, its long-term objectives and
the degree of difficulty in setting extended multi-year financial
goals based on the economic and industry climates. We believe
achievement of the meaningful performance targets and shareholder
return goals that result from this rigorous goal-setting process
will drive long-term value creation for our investors.
The Compensation Committee makes all final compensation and equity
award decisions regarding our NEOs, except for the CEO, whose
compensation is determined by the independent members of the full
Board, based upon recommendations of the Compensation
Committee.
The Role of Management.
The CEO reviews his recommendations pertaining to other executives
(non-NEO) pay with the Committee providing transparency and
oversight. Decisions on non-NEO executive pay are made by the CEO.
The CEO does not participate in the deliberations of the Committee
regarding his own compensation.
The Role of the Independent Consultant.
The Compensation Committee engages an independent compensation
consultant to provide expertise on competitive pay practices,
program design, and an objective assessment of any inherent risks
of any programs. Pursuant to authority granted to it under its
charter, the Committee changed its independent consultant in
October 2021 from Pearl Meyer to Semler Brossy. Semler Brossy, as
Pearl Meyer before it, reports directly to the Committee and does
not provide any additional services to management. The Committee
has conducted an independence assessment of its consultants in
accordance with SEC rules.
The Role of Market References - Peer Group
Companies.
Our executive compensation program considers the compensation
practices of companies with which the Company competes or could
compete for executive talent. In its review of 2021 executive
compensation, the Compensation Committee compared the Company’s
overall compensation structure (mix of pay) and levels for the NEOs
(total annual compensation, as well as each component of their
total compensation) with the peer group companies.
Peer group companies generally have similar business models (e.g.,
multiple product lines, significant concentration of international
sales, manufacturing operations) and are within comparable size
ranges (e.g., market capitalization, revenue). For the purposes of
setting 2021 compensation, and with the support of Pearl Meyer, the
Compensation Committee considered the following list of peer group
companies (the “Peer Group Companies”) which was unchanged from the
prior year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peer
Group Companies for Setting 2021 Compensation |
Albany International Corp. |
ESCO Technologies, Inc. |
SPX FLOW, Inc. |
Altra Industrial Motion Corp. |
Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.(1)
|
Standex International Corporation |
Barnes Group Inc. |
Mueller Water Products, Inc. |
Tennant Company |
Chart Industries, Inc.(1)
|
NN, Inc.(1)
|
TriMas Corporation |
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.(1)
|
Rexnord Corporation |
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. |
EnPro Industries, Inc.(1)
|
SPX Corporation |
|
(1)
This company is one of the five companies that the Compensation
Committee subsequently removed from our peer group list in
preparation for 2022 compensation planning. New companies added to
the peer group for 2022 compensation planning are: Astrec
Industries, Inc, Ducommun Incorporated, Helios Technologies, Inc.,
Kadant Inc. and Kaman Corporation.
|
The Committee also reviewed supplemental industry market survey
data as part of its subjective determination of 2021 target
compensation levels for our NEOs. When reviewing market survey
data, to the extent available the Compensation Committee relies on
size-appropriate industry survey data based on annual
revenue.
2021 Executive Compensation in Detail
As set forth above, the principal elements of the Company’s
executive compensation program consist of base salary, annual
short-term incentives, the MSPP and long-term incentives. 2021 base
salaries for our NEOs, in the aggregate, were slightly below the
market median for our peer group, and target total cash (base
salaries plus target short-term incentives) and target total direct
compensation (target total cash plus target LTI) in the aggregate
approximated the market median for our peer
group, although in each case there were variations in market
position by executive due to factors including tenure, experience
in current role, individual performance, and consideration of past
awards.
Base Salary
NEOs' base salaries are determined by evaluating factors such as
the responsibilities and complexity of the position, the experience
and performance of the individual, market data for similar roles,
overall company performance and internal equity within the
Company.
At the beginning of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee
generally reviews and adjusts the base salaries for each of the
Company’s executives, with any adjustments to become effective on
April 1st
of that year. NEOs who were employed by the Company at that time
received base salary increases ranging between 3.0% to 10.0%, to
better align their pay with the market. Base salaries for each NEO
are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEO |
2020
Year-End Base Salary |
2021
Year-End Base Salary |
% Change |
Scott Buckhout |
$790,000 |
$810,000 |
2.5% |
Abhishek Khandelwal |
$400,000 |
$440,000 |
10.0% |
Tony Najjar |
$385,000 |
$396,500 |
3.0% |
Arjun Sharma |
$360,000 |
$371,000 |
3.1% |
Jessica Wenzell
(1)
|
$340,000 |
$390,000 |
14.7% |
Sumit Mehrotra
(2)
|
$412,000 |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Ms. Wenzell received a 10.0% merit increase in April 2021 and a
4.3% increase in November 2021 in connection with her taking on the
additional role of Chief People Officer.
|
(2) |
Mr. Mehrotra received a 3.0% merit increase in April 2021 prior to
his termination of employment on July 5, 2021. |
The salaries for Messrs. Buckhout, Najjar, Sharma and Mehrotra were
increased to maintain alignment of their compensation relative to,
in the case of Messrs. Buckhout and Mehrotra, executives in
comparable positions within our peer companies, and in the case of
Messrs. Sharma and Najjar, market benchmarks determined based on
general industry survey data. The salaries for Mr. Khandelwal and
Ms. Wenzell were increased more significantly in order to more
appropriately align salary level relative to median market practice
for these roles.
Short-Term Incentive Plan
Target Award Opportunities.
The STI Plan provides our NEOs the opportunity to earn a
performance-based annual cash bonus. Actual bonus payouts depend on
the achievement of pre-established performance objectives and can
range from 0% to 300% of target award amounts, depending on the
financial measure. Target annual award opportunities for the NEOs
are approved by the Compensation Committee and are intended to be
competitive in the market in which the Company competes for talent
and reflect the level of responsibility of the role. They are,
therefore, set at or around the median for comparable positions in
the market. For 2021, target award amounts, which are stated as a
percentage of base salary, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEO |
Target Award Opportunity (as % of base salary) |
Scott Buckhout |
110% |
Abhishek Khandelwal(1)
|
70% |
Tony Najjar |
60% |
Arjun Sharma |
60% |
Jessica Wenzell |
60% |
Sumit Mehrotra(2)
|
60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Khandelwal was not eligible to receive any payments under the
2021 STI Plan as a result of his termination of employment on
December 31, 2021.
|
(2) |
Mr. Mehrotra was eligible to participate in the 2021 STI Plan on a
pro-rated basis pursuant to the terms of his separation agreement
in connection with his termination of employment on July 5,
2021 |
Performance Measures, Weightings and Goals.
Our STI Plan pays participants based on levels of performance
against rigorous metrics established by the Compensation Committee.
The performance measures vary depending upon the role and
responsibility of the NEO.
For 2021, STI awards for Corporate NEOs were based on achievements,
as calculated based on the following performance measures and
weightings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Measures |
Weightings |
Aerospace & Defense Group(1)
|
30% |
Industrial Group(1)
|
30% |
CIRCOR AOI |
30% |
CIRCOR Free Cash Flow |
10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Reflects Group STI Plan results calculated pursuant to the table
below but excluding the impact of CIRCOR AOI on such
results
|
For purposes of calculating STI awards for Group NEOs,
group-specific AOI, Adjusted Working Capital % of Sales, Net Sales
and CIRCOR AOI are considered.
For 2021, STI awards for Group NEOs were based on the achievement
of the following performance measures and weightings for each group
(which impact all NEOs):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Measures |
Weightings |
Group AOI |
35% |
CIRCOR AOI |
30% |
Group Adjusted Working Capital % of Sales |
20% |
Group Net Sales |
15% |
The table below summarizes the Threshold, Target, Stretch and Above
Stretch performance levels and the calculated results for each
performance measure in effect for our NEOs in 2021. For performance
between Threshold, Target, Stretch and Above Stretch, bonus pool
funding is determined by linear interpolation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measure(1)
|
Threshold |
Target |
Stretch |
Above Stretch |
Achievement
Results(1)
|
A&D Group AOI |
$44.8M |
$64.0M |
$83.1M |
$102.3M |
$55.3M |
A&D Group AWC % of Sales |
29.9% |
23.0% |
16.1% |
9.2% |
37.8% |
A&D Group Net Sales |
$225.6M |
$282.0M |
$338.4M |
$394.8M |
$250.1M |
Industrial Group AOI |
$28.8M |
$41.2M |
$53.5M |
$65.9M |
$23.2M |
Industrial Group AWC % of Sales |
30.4% |
23.4% |
16.3% |
9.3% |
19.0% |
Industrial Group Net Sales |
$331.9M |
$414.8M |
$497.8M |
$580.8M |
$415.0M |
CIRCOR AOI |
$66.7M |
$83.4M |
$100.1M |
$116.8M |
$51.4M |
CIRCOR Free Cash Flow |
$32.9M |
$47.0M |
$61.1M |
$75.2M |
($3.9M) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Funding as % of Target Bonus
(2)
|
50.0% |
100.0% |
200% |
300.0% |
See table below |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Threshold, Target, Stretch and Above Stretch are calculated using a
set foreign exchange rate. That same rate is used to calculate
Achievement Results. The Compensation Committee believes that it is
important to use a set exchange rate for metric and result
calculations to reduce the impact on the level of achievement of
metrics caused by fluctuations in exchange rates, which are beyond
the control of our NEOs.
|
(2) |
To achieve funding above Target level with respect to Group AWC% of
Sales, Group AOI achievement must be at or above Threshold; to
achieve funding above Target level with respect to Group Net Sales,
Group AOI achievement must be at or above Target; to achieve
funding above Target level with respect to CIRCOR Free Cash Flow,
CIRCOR AOI achievement must be at or above Threshold. |
The above performance measures include non-GAAP financial measures;
for reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure, see
[Exhibit A].
Based on the outlook at the time the goals were set and with input
from Pearl Meyer, the Compensation Committee concluded that these
performance goals struck an appropriate balance in providing both a
reasonable probability of attainment and sufficient rigor and
motivation of superior performance. The Compensation Committee
considered the probability of achievement of different levels of
performance as well as the uncertainty concerning the Company’s
performance in 2021.
2021 Short-Term Incentive Plan Results
The calculated results of our 2021 STI Plan, as reflected in the
table above, fell short of our targets, in part due to the slow
pace of recovery from the waning impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on
our business and also due to the impact of the [PE accounting
corrections on our financial results]. Our NEOs shared in the STI
payments based on the STI Plan funding results of their respective
business Group as set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEO |
STI Plan Group Alignment |
STI Plan Funding Result |
Target STI Plan Amount |
Actual Award
(as a % of Target) |
Actual Award
(in Dollars) |
Scott Buckhout(1)
|
Corporate |
31.2% |
$891,000 |
—% |
$— |
Abhishek Khandelwal(2)
|
Corporate |
31.2% |
$308,000 |
—% |
$— |
Tony Najjar |
Aerospace & Defense Group |
37.9% |
$237,900 |
37.9% |
$90,057 |
Arjun Sharma |
Corporate |
31.2% |
$222,600 |
31.2% |
$69,505 |
Jessica Wenzell |
Corporate |
31.2% |
$234,000 |
31.2% |
$73,064 |
Sumit Mehrotra(1)(3)
|
Industrial Group |
35.0% |
$129,793 |
—% |
$— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Based on the significant accounting irregularities discovered by
the Company with respect to the Pipeline Engineering business unit
as announced in the Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2022, which
occurred over multiple years under the leadership of Messrs.
Buckhout and Mehrotra, the impacts thereof on actual performance of
the STI financial metrics, the inability to rely on the Company’s
prior financial statements due to the misstatements, and the
impending restatement of the Company’s financial results, the
Committee determined it is in the best interest of the Company to
exercise the Committee’s discretion to adjust the amounts earned by
Mr. Buckhout and Mr. Mehrotra under the 2021 STI Plan to
zero. |
(2) |
Mr. Khandelwal did not receive any payments under the 2021 STI Plan
as a result of his termination of employment on December 31,
2021.
|
(3) |
Mr. Mehrotra was eligible to participate in the 2021 STI Plan on a
pro-rated basis pursuant to the terms of his separation agreement
in connection with this termination of employment on July 5, 2021.
The Company agreed to Mr. Mehrotra's eligibility for a 2021 bonus
payout in exchange for his mutually agreed date of termination and
the orderly transition of his responsibilities to other employees.
Due to the Pipeline Engineering accounting irregularities, Mr.
Mehrotra's 2021 STI payment was adjusted to zero. |
Historical Alignment of Performance and STI Plan
Results
The chart below depicts our track record of past payouts for
Corporate NEOs, under our STI Plan, over the last five
years:
|
|
|
*2020
Result: reflects adjustment approved by the Compensation Committee
from the actual 28.3% of target achieved.
|
Management Stock Purchase Plan (“MSPP”)
In connection with our 2021 STI Plan payments, consistent with past
practice, many of our NEOs made an advanced election to apply all
or a portion of their 2021 STI Plan cash bonus payment towards the
purchase of RSUs under the MSPP. The table below outlines the MSPP
deferral election made by our NEOs prior to the beginning of
2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEO |
2021 Cash Bonus Deferral - Election |
Scott Buckhout
(1)
|
70% |
Abhishek Khandelwal |
—% |
Tony Najjar |
30% |
Arjun Sharma |
100% |
Jessica Wenzell |
—% |
Sumit Mehrotra
(1)
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Although Messrs. Buckhout and Mehrotra each elected to participate
in the MSPP with respect to the 2021 STI payout, no MSPP awards
were granted since they did not receive a 2021 STI
payment. |
Long-Term Incentive Awards
LTI awards are intended to provide executives with a continuing
stake in the long-term success of the Company and to align their
interests with those of stockholders. LTI awards are also used to
attract, retain and motivate executives responsible for the
Company’s long-term success.
The Compensation Committee evaluates the Long Term Incentive Plan
(the “LTI Plan”) annually relative to its objectives as well as
practices within the Peer Group Companies. For our 2021 LTI grants,
we introduced a new performance measure for our PSUs of Relative
TSR, which compares our performance against a peer group of
companies within the S&P 600 SmallCap Industrial Index, as
described in more detail below. In addition to eliminating the
difficulty of setting multi-year financial targets during an
uncertain business environment, the change to using Relative TSR
award structure for our LTI program eliminates redundancy of
financial metrics between our STI and LTI Plans, further aligns our
NEO compensation with stockholder interests by rewarding for TSR
performance above peers and also aligns the three-year cliff
performance and vesting periods with peer market
practice.
The 2021 LTI Plan included an equal mix of PSUs based on the
Relative TSR measure and time-based RSUs. The Committee believes
that using a mix of performance and time-based awards provides
balance to the LTI Plan with substantial alignment to shareholder
interests with the TSR measure and mitigates retention risk for our
NEOs in periods when performance may lag our
peers. Vesting of LTI awards is subject to continued employment
with the Company on the date of vesting, creating a retention
incentive for our NEOs.
Target LTI awards for each of our NEOs in 2021 was expressed in
dollar amounts and varied based on consideration of factors such as
role, level of responsibility, performance and past award
history:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEO |
PSUs(1)
|
RSUs(1)
|
Total Value |
Scott Buckhout(2)
|
$1,425,000 |
$1,425,000 |
$2,850,000 |
Abhishek Khandelwal(2)
|
$225,000 |
$225,000 |
$450,000 |
Tony Najjar(3)
|
$200,000 |
$200,000 |
$400,000 |
Arjun Sharma |
$200,000 |
$200,000 |
$400,000 |
Jessica Wenzell(4)
|
$125,000 |
$125,000 |
$250,000 |
Sumit Mehrotra(2)
|
$200,000 |
$200,000 |
$400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The number of share units underlying the PSUs and RSUs was
determined based on the average per share price of the Company’s
common stock for the 20 consecutive trading days ending on March
16, 2021, rounding up for any fractional shares. The corresponding
grant date fair value of these awards as reported in the Summary
Compensation Table and Grants of Plan Based Awards Table differs
from the values listed above since we generally account for these
types of awards using the closing price of the Company’s common
stock on the trading day preceding the grant date and, with regard
to PSUs, the grant date fair value is determined based on a Monte
Carlo simulation that takes into account the probability of all
possible stock price outcomes and Relative TSR performance between
the start of the performance period (February 26, 2021) and the
grant date (March 17, 2021).
|
(2) |
Awards for Messrs. Buckhout, Khandelwal and Mehrotra were
subsequently forfeited in connection with their termination of
employment, with the exception of the first vesting tranche
(one-third) of Mr. Buckhout's RSU award which vested pursuant to
his termination agreement. |
(3) |
Mr. Najjar's target award was increased to $500,000, to be
effective with the 2022 award cycle, in connection with his
appointment as Chief Operating Officer and Interim President and
Chief Executive Officer effective January 19, 2022. He was
appointed President and Chief Executive Officer on August 10, 2022,
with no change to his LTI award. |
(4) |
Ms. Wenzell's target award was increased to $350,000, to be
effective with the 2022 award cycle, in connection with her
appointment as Chief People Officer effective November 15,
2021. |
2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan
In conjunction with its annual review of the compensation program
design, the Compensation Committee determined that a change to the
structure of future PSU awards from using internal financial
measures to using Relative TSR would (1) eliminate the difficulty
of setting multi-year financial targets during an uncertain
business environment, (2) eliminate redundancy of financial metrics
between our STI and LTI plans, (3) further align our NEO
compensation with stockholder interests by rewarding for TSR
performance above peers and (4) align the three-year cliff
performance and vesting periods with peer market practice.
Effective with the 2021 LTI awards, the performance metric for the
PSU portion of NEO awards is based on Relative TSR, which will
measures the Company’s return to stockholders in the form of stock
price appreciation and assuming reinvestment of any dividends over
a three-year period relative to that of other peer industrial
companies (the "TSR Peer Group"). The TSR Peer Group is comprised
of a custom group of companies listed on the S&P 600 SmallCap
Industrial Index, which includes other mid-sized industrial
companies that are comparable to the current profile of the
Company.
For purposes of above, "S&P 600 SmallCap Industrial Index"
means each company that was in the S&P 600 SmallCap Industrial
Index as of February 26, 2021 and continues to be a member of such
index through February 29, 2024 (and including any companies that
become bankrupt or insolvent prior to such date) but excluding the
following companies that the Compensation Committee determined were
inappropriate comparisons: Exponent, Inc., Forrester Research,
Inc., Heidrick and Struggles International, Inc, Interface, Inc.,
Kelly Services, Inc., Korn Ferry, Matthews International
Corporation, Pitney Bowes, Inc., Resources Connection Inc., True
Blue Inc., Unifirst Corporation, US Ecology Inc., and Viad Corp.
The companies excluded from the TSR Peer Group were removed due to
the higher concentration of services in their business mix relative
to the Company.
Final award value is determined after completion of the three-year
performance period based on the following schedule, subject in each
case to (1) a vesting limit of no more than the number of target
shares awarded if absolute TSR over the three year performance
period is negative (the "Negative Return Cap") and (2) a limit on
the value of shares than can vest, determined as of the last day of
the performance period, equal to a maximum of six hundred percent
(600%) of the product of (i) the number of target shares awarded,
times (ii) the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the
grant date (the “600% Cap”). If the 600% Cap is exceeded, the
number of PSUs that would otherwise become earned PSUs will be
reduced to the extent necessary to avoid the 600% Cap being
exceeded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
TSR Relative to the TSRs of the S&P 600 SmallCap Industrial
Companies
for the Performance Period |
Earned
Vesting
Percentage
(% of target shares awarded that will vest)(1)
|
Below 25th Percentile |
0% |
25th Percentile |
50% |
50th Percentile |
100% |
75th Percentile or Higher |
200% (Maximum) |
(1) Subject to the Negative Return Cap and/or the 600% Cap, as
applicable, as defined in the preceding paragraph. |
As of December 31, 2021, the Company's Relative TSR from the
beginning of the performance period of February 26, 2021 was below
25th percentile.
Prior Year PSU Results
LTI awards made to our NEOs in 2020 and 2019 were also delivered in
a 50/50 mix of RSUs and PSUs. The actual realizable value of these
PSUs is determined based on cumulative performance over three
years. For each performance year in the three-year performance
period, cumulative goals were set for adjusted cash flow and
adjusted operating margin and performance is assessed at the end of
each year to determine the number of shares to vest.
The PSUs will vest only if the pre-established cumulative goals are
met. PSUs that do not vest in years one or two of the performance
period due to performance results may vest in a subsequent year up
to 100% if the cumulative performance in years two and/or three, as
applicable, is 100% of target or above. Performance at threshold
achievement level results in .01% of target shares vesting;
performance at target achievement level results in 100% of target
shares vesting; and performance at maximum achievement level or
better results in a maximum of 200% of target shares
vesting.
For the second vesting tranche of the PSUs granted in 2020
(reflecting cumulative results for 2020 and 2021), the Company’s
performance fell below the threshold for Adjusted MCF and Average
AOM resulting in zero shares vesting, as detailed
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Measures
(50/50 weighting) |
Performance Range |
Actual Performance |
%
Payout |
Shares Earned and Vested |
Threshold |
Target |
Maximum |
Fiscal Years 2020-2021 Adjusted MCF |
$83.2M
|
$104.0M
|
$124.8M
|
$23.7M |
—% |
0 |
Fiscal Years 2020-2021 AOM |
10.8% |
13.5% |
16.1% |
7.2% |
—% |
0 |
With regard to the third and last vesting tranche of the 2019 PSUs
granted in 2019 (reflecting cumulative results for 2019, 2020 and
2021), the Company underachieved its cumulative targets for Free
Cash Flow and Average AOM. As a result of the impact of the
Pipeline Engineering matters on the Company's financial performance
over the three-year performance period of this award, the
Compensation Committee exercised the Committee’s discretion to
adjust the amounts earned under the last tranche of the 2019 PSU
award to zero, as described in more detail in note (2) to the table
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
Measures
(50/50 weighting) |
Performance Range |
Actual Performance |
%
Payout (2) |
Shares Earned and Vested (2) |
Threshold |
Target |
Maximum |
Fiscal Years 2019-2021 Adjusted FCF(1)
|
$12.9M |
$185.4M |
$154.1M |
($33.6M) |
—% |
0 |
Fiscal Years 2019-2021 AOM |
6.72% |
9.60% |
12.48% |
6.88% |
—% |
0 |
(1) "Adjusted Free Cash Flow" for this award is is calculated by
adding the Company’s cash provided by operating activities less
capital expenditures for that year.
|
(2) Based on the significant accounting irregularities discovered
by the Company with respect to the Pipeline Engineering business
unit as announced via Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2022, the impacts
thereof on actual performance of the PSU financial metrics, the
inability to rely on the Company’s prior financial statements due
to the misstatements, and the impending restatement of the
Company’s financial results, the Committee determined it is in the
best interest of the Company to exercise the Committee’s discretion
to adjust the amounts earned under the last tranche of the 2019 PSU
award to zero.
|
Retention Incentive Compensation
In connection with the Mr. Khandelwal's termination of employment
in December 2021 and our search for a new chief financial officer,
the Compensation Committee approved retention awards for two of our
NEOs that are integral to our financial
reporting, disclosure and corporate governance processes. These
awards were made to retain experienced executives to provide
continuity of leadership for these important functions through the
end of 2022. See also
2022 Compensation Actions Update
below for discussion on additional retention issued in
2022.
•Mr.
Sharma, in connection with his appointment to Interim Chief
Financial Officer effective January 1, 2022, will receive (1) an
additional $4,500 per bi-weekly pay period during the term of his
interim role, (2) payment on his behalf up to $65,000 towards an
executive management education program, (3) a retention bonus
installment in the amount of $95,000 following June 30, 2022, and
(4) a second retention bonus installment in the amount of $45,000
following December 31, 2022. The stipend was eliminated following
Mr. Sharma's appointment to Chief Financial Officer on August 10,
2022.
•Ms.
Wenzell, in connection with her General Counsel role, received a
retention bonus installment in the amount of $100,000 following the
filing of our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2021, and will receive a second retention bonus
installment in the amount of $50,000 following December 31,
2022.
Payment of each bonus installment is subject to (1) continued
employment, (2) absence of a notice from the executive or from the
Company of intent to terminate employment and (3) satisfactory
performance through the applicable scheduled installment payment
dates and, additionally, payment of the first bonus installment is
subject to repayment to the Company in the event of termination of
employment for cause prior to December 31, 2022. Mr. Sharma's
retention installments, to the extent not already paid, are subject
to full payment in the event the Company terminates his employment
without cause. Ms. Wenzell's retention installments, to the extent
not already paid, are subject to payment on a pro-rata basis in the
event the Company provides notice of its intent to terminate her
employment without cause. Effective with amendments made in August
of 2022 for both Mr. Sharma and Ms. Wenzell, any unpaid retention
installments will become payable upon a qualifying termination as
defined in CIRCOR’s NEO Change in Control Agreements.
Long-Term Incentive Granting Practices
Most LTI awards are granted at the time of the annual grant in the
first quarter of the year, although awards may be granted as part
of the hiring process or in connection with a change in
responsibility. LTI awards granted during the year have a grant
date no earlier than the date of approval. Grants for our executive
officers are typically reviewed and approved at a regularly
scheduled Compensation Committee meeting or by written consent in
advance of the individual’s employment commencement or promotion
date. For these awards, the grant date is the date of the meeting
if the individual receiving the grant has already commenced
employment. If the individual has not yet commenced employment, the
date of grant is the business day following the individual’s first
day of employment.
For our 2021 annual LTI awards, the number of share units
underlying each award was determined by dividing the award value by
the average per share price of the Company’s common stock for the
20 consecutive trading days ending on March 16, 2021, rounding up
for any fractional shares. This method was introduced in the first
quarter of 2020, in lieu of using the closing price on the grant
date, during a highly volatile period in the trading price of our
stock. Using this approach ensures that the number of share units
awarded is not inflated due the closing price on the grant
date.
Other Executive Compensation Practices & Policies
Stock Ownership Guidelines
To further align the interests of the executive officers of the
Company with the interests of the stockholders, the Company has
adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines for executive officers. These
guidelines establish an expectation that, within a five-year
period, each NEO shall achieve and maintain an equity interest in
the Company at least equal to a specified multiple of such
individual’s annual base salary. The applicable multiples are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position |
Target |
Chief Executive Officer |
5x annual base salary |
Chief Financial Officer |
3x annual base salary |
Other NEOs |
2x annual base salary |
In calculating an individual’s equity interest, credit is given for
(i) the value of actual shares of Common Stock owned beneficially,
(ii) the before-tax value of all vested stock options and (iii) the
before-tax value of all outstanding RSU awards (including those
which the individual has received in lieu of bonus compensation).
The calculation of an individual’s equity
interest, however, does not include the value of any outstanding
equity awards subject to risk of forfeiture by virtue of
performance.
An annual review is conducted by our Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee to assess compliance with the guidelines. As
of December 31, 2021, each of our NEOs met their applicable
ownership guidelines, or, for NEOs who have been with the Company
for less than five years, were on track to achieve their ownership
guidelines by the applicable target compliance date. No adjustments
to stock ownership guidelines were made due to the COVID-19
pandemic.
Clawback Policy
Under our clawback policy, in the event of a restatement of the
Company’s financial results, the Board may recover or require
reimbursement of incentive compensation received by a NEO during
the three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date on
which we are required to prepare a restatement. In addition, if the
Board determines that a NEO engaged in misconduct, then the Board
shall take such action as it deems to be in the Company’s best
interest and necessary to remedy the misconduct or acts/omissions
of the NEO and prevent their recurrence, including recovery or
required reimbursement of incentive compensation. Misconduct for
this purpose includes, but is not limited to, fraudulent, criminal
or other willful misconduct, any action or inaction that causes
harm, willful and material breach of Company policies, breach of
confidentiality obligations or withholding of material information
from or misstatement to the Board. Any recoupment under this policy
may be in addition to, and shall not otherwise limit, any other
remedies that may be available to the Company under applicable law,
including disciplinary actions up to and including termination of
employment.
Insider Trading, Anti-Hedging & Anti-Pledging
Policies
We maintain an insider trading policy that prohibits hedging the
economic risk of ownership of our stock by all directors, executive
officers and certain designated employees. No person who is
considered an “insider” of the Company, which includes each of our
NEOs and directors, may directly or indirectly sell any securities
of the Company that are not owned by the person at the time of the
sale (short sale). Such persons also may not purchase or sell puts,
calls, options or other derivative instruments in respect of our
securities at any time without the approval of the Company’s
Clearance Officer. We also do not allow officers or directors to
pledge Company stock.
Risk Assessment and Mitigation of Compensation Policies and
Practices
The Compensation Committee has reviewed our incentive compensation
programs, discussed the concept of risk as it relates to our
compensation program, considered various mitigating factors and
reviewed these items with its independent consultant, Pearl Meyer.
In addition, our Compensation Committee asked Pearl Meyer to
conduct an independent risk assessment of our executive
compensation program. Based on these reviews and discussions, the
Compensation Committee does not believe our compensation program
creates risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Other Benefits
The Company maintains a defined contribution 401(k) plan in which
substantially all of our U.S. employees, including our NEOs, are
eligible to participate. We also maintain a nonqualified deferred
compensation plan to provide benefits, at the Company’s discretion,
that would otherwise be provided under the qualified 401(k) plan to
certain participants but for the imposition of certain maximum
statutory limits imposed on qualified plan benefits (for example,
annual limits on eligible pay and contributions).
We also provide our NEOs with a limited number of perquisites as
part of their compensation arrangements, which we consider to be
reasonable and consistent with competitive practice. These
perquisites include annual car allowances and financial
counseling/tax preparation services, which, in total, comprise a de
minimis part of the NEO’s target total direct
compensation.
Severance and Change in Control Agreements
In order to attract and retain key executives, the Company has
entered into severance and change of control agreements with our
NEOs, including special severance agreements entered into with
Messrs. Buckhout and Mehrotra in connection with their termination
of employment, as discussed in “Severance
and Other Benefits upon Termination of Employment or Change of
Control.”
The agreements are intended to support management continuity and
align with market practice. The change of control agreements are
intended to maintain focus on stockholder value creation in the
event of an actual or threatened change of control. Pursuant to
Company policy, the Company does not provide tax gross-ups in
connection with any compensatory
arrangements. As a result, we do not have any change of control
agreements that provide for tax gross-ups. More detail is provided
below in “Severance
and Other Benefits upon Termination of Employment or Change of
Control.”
2022 Compensation Actions Update
As the Company remained in a period of significant volatility in
2022, including the departure of Mr. Buckhout on January 19, 2022,
the announcement that our Board initiated a review of potential
strategic alternatives in response to multiple inquiries from third
parties about a possible transaction, and the restatement of the
Company's financial statements, the Compensation Committee and/or
the Board took the following actions:
•For
Mr. Najjar, in connection with his appointment to Chief Operating
Officer and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer effective
January 19, 2022, the Board approved (1) an increase in base salary
from $396,500 to $425,000, (2) an increase in STI target for 2022
from 60% to 65% of base salary, (3) a 2022 LTI grant in the amount
of $500,000, and (4) for his interim role, additional compensation
of $20,000 per month during the term of his interim role and a
$250,000 RSU grant schedule to vest one year following grant (with
vesting accelerated if Mr. Najjar’s employment with the Company is
terminated for a reason other than for cause) to be granted upon
the earlier of the conclusion of his interim role or immediately
prior to a change of control event. In connection with Mr. Najjar’s
appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer on August 10,
2022, (1) his annual base salary was increased to $665,000, (2) the
stipend was eliminated, (3) his STI target for 2022 was increased
from 65% to 75% of his salary and (4) the RSU grant described above
was made.
•In
connection with his appointment as Chief Financial Officer on
August 10, 2022, (1) Mr. Sharma’s base salary was increased to
$499,000, (2) the stipend was eliminated, and (3) his STI target
for 2022 was increased from 60% to 65%.
•On
July 20, 2022, the Compensation Committee approved a retention
award for Mr. Najjar in the amount of $40,000, scheduled to vest in
two equal installments on August 31, 2022 and November 30,
2022.
•For
Mr. Sharma, on July 20, 2022 the Compensation Committee approved an
additional retention award of $74,000, scheduled to vest in two
equal installments on August 31, 2022 and November 30,
2022.
•For
Ms. Wenzell, on July 20, 2022 the Compensation Committee approved
an additional retention award of $78,000, scheduled to vest in two
equal installments on August 31, 2022 and November 30,
2022.
Additionally, in connection with the filing delay of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2021 and the corresponding delay in the grant of our 2022 LTI
awards, the Compensation Committee conditionally approved the cash
settlement of these LTI awards in the event that a change in
control transaction is consummated prior to the grant date. This
action was taken to provide our executives with a measure of
certainty regarding their compensation during a period of
significant uncertainty about the future ownership and leadership
structure of the Company. Pending LTI awards were made on August
15, 2022.
SUMMARY OF CASH AND CERTAIN OTHER COMPENSATION AND
OTHER PAYMENTS TO THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following sections provide a summary of cash and certain other
amounts earned by the NEOs in Fiscal Year 2021 (and the preceding
two fiscal years). Except where noted, the information in the
Summary Compensation Table generally pertains to compensation to
the NEOs for Fiscal Year 2021. We encourage you to read the
following tables closely. The narratives preceding the tables and
the footnotes accompanying each table are important parts of each
table. Also, we encourage you to read this section in conjunction
with the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above.
2021 Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and
Principal Position |
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
Stock
Awards
(1)
|
Option
Awards(2)
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(3)
|
All Other Compensation(4)
|
Total
|
(a) |
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e) |
(f) |
(g)
|
(h)
|
(i)
|
Scott Buckhout
President and Chief Executive Officer (5)
|
2021 |
$805,385 |
$— |
$3,410,115 |
$— |
$— |
$14,001 |
$4,229,501 |
2020 |
$754,017 |
$405,586 |
$2,193,689 |
$— |
$246,164 |
$3,582 |
$3,603,038 |
2019 |
$761,077 |
$— |
$1,259,320 |
$1,375,000 |
$— |
$13,449 |
$3,408,846 |
Abhishek Khandelwal
Chief Financial Officer (6)
|
2021 |
$430,769 |
$— |
$502,973 |
$— |
$— |
$26,001 |
$959,743 |
2020 |
$273,077 |
$234,470 |
$428,641 |
$— |
$51,268 |
$11,032 |
$998,488 |
Tony Najjar
President, Aerospace and Defense Group
|
2021 |
$393,846 |
$— |
$477,828 |
$— |
$90,057 |
$14,031 |
$975,762 |
2020 |
$345,962 |
$79,356 |
$368,095 |
$— |
$128,544 |
$2,835 |
$924,792 |
Arjun Sharma
Senior Vice President, Business Development
|
2021 |
$368,462 |
$— |
$526,926 |
$— |
$69,505 |
$22,401 |
$987,294 |
2020 |
$315,712 |
$100,813 |
$395,605 |
$— |
$61,187 |
$14,342 |
$887,659 |
2019 |
$301,412 |
$— |
$187,500 |
$62,500 |
$— |
$25,762 |
$577,174 |
Jessica Wenzell
Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Chief People
Officer
|
2021 |
$368,000 |
$— |
$279,469 |
$— |
$73,064 |
$13,890 |
$734,423 |
Sumit Mehrotra
Former President, Industrial Group (7)
|
2021 |
$219,162 |
$— |
$480,616 |
$— |
$— |
$48,671 |
$748,449 |
2020 |
$407,077 |
$110,127 |
$304,632 |
$— |
$25,833 |
$213,927 |
$1,061,596 |
2019 |
$383,846 |
$— |
$240,000 |
$80,000 |
$— |
$371,533 |
$1,075,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Reflects the grant date fair value of PSUs and time-based
restricted stock units (“Time RSUs”), including MSPP RSUs
attributable to the 33% discount on restricted stock units
purchased under our Management Stock Purchase Plan (MSPP) in 2021
in connection with our 2020 STI Plan. For more details about these
grants, please refer to the section below entitled
“2021
Grants of Plan-Based Awards.”
A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the amounts in
this column may be found in Note 14 (“Share-Based Compensation”) to
our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2021 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
with the SEC on July 26, 2022.
|
(2) |
Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options
awards. For a discussion of the assumptions related to the
calculation of the amounts in this column, refer to Note 14
(“Share-Based Compensation”) to our audited consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2021 included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on July 26,
2022. |
(3) |
Reflects the amounts earned under our STI Plan by each NEO, whether
received in cash or RSUs. Some of our NEOs elected to use all or a
portion of their short-term incentive to purchase RSUs under our
MSPP in 2021 and 2020. There were no annual bonus payments made to
NEOs for 2019. The number of RSUs purchased by each NEO is as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEO |
Year |
Percentage of Bonus Used to Purchase RSUs
|
Amount of Bonus Excluding Sign-On Bonus
|
Amount of Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
|
Amount of Bonus Plus Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation
|
Amount of Bonus Used to Purchase RSUs
|
Number of Purchased RSUs
|
|
Scott Buckhout
|
2021 |
70% |
— |
— |
$0 |
— |
|
— |
|
2020 |
70% |
$405,586 |
$246,164 |
$651,750 |
$456,225 |
17,100 |
|
2019 |
65% |
— |
— |
$0 |
— |
|
— |
|
Abhishek Khandelwal
|
2021 |
—% |
$— |
$— |
$— |
$— |
— |
|
2020 |
—% |
$84,470 |
$51,268 |
$135,738 |
— |
|
— |
|
Tony Najjar
|
2021 |
30% |
— |
$90,057 |
$90,057 |
27,017 |
|
2,040 |
|
2020 |
30% |
79,356 |
128,544 |
$207,900 |
62,370 |
|
2,337 |
|
Arjun Sharma
|
2021 |
100% |
$— |
$69,505 |
$69,505 |
$69,505 |
5,249 |
|
2020 |
100% |
$100,813 |
$61,187 |
$162,000 |
$162,000 |
6,072 |
|
2019 |
100% |
$— |
$— |
$— |
$— |
— |
|
Jessica Wenzell |
2021 |
—% |
— |
$73,064 |
$73,064 |
— |
|
— |
|
Sumit Mehrotra
|
2021 |
100% |
$— |
$— |
$— |
— |
|
— |
|
2020 |
50% |
$110,127 |
$25,833 |
$135,960 |
$67,980 |
2,548 |
|
2019 |
100% |
$— |
$— |
$— |
$— |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under our MSPP, the purchase price for RSUs is 67% of the closing
price of our Common Stock on the date of grant. The grant date fair
value of the 33% discount is referred to as MSPP RSUs, and the MSPP
RSUs have been included under the Stock Awards column as additional
compensation to NEOs. The total number of RSUs purchased in
connection with the 2021 STI Plan was determined by dividing the
dollar amount of the bonus indicated in the above table by $13.24,
which was 67% of the closing price of our Common Stock on August
15, 2022. For the 2020 STI Plan, the total number of RSUs purchased
was determined by dividing the dollar amount of the bonus indicated
in the above table by $26.68, which is 67% of the closing price of
our Common Stock on March 16, 2021. The actual number of RSUs
purchased under the MSPP may be reduced to pay for tax withholding.
Although Messrs. Buckhout and Mehrotra each elected to participate
in the MSPP with respect to the 2021 STI payout, no MSPP awards
were granted since they did not receive a 2021 STI
payment. |
(4) |
See “2021 All Other Compensation Table” for specific items in this
category.
|
(5) |
Mr. Buckhout terminated employment with CIRCOR on January 19, 2022.
The equity awards granted to Mr. Buckhout in 2021 and disclosed in
the Summary Compensation Table were forfeited except for 12,787
RSUs that vested pursuant to his separation agreement.
|
(6) |
Mr. Khandelwal terminated employment with CIRCOR on December 31,
2021. The equity awards granted to Mr. Khandelwal in 2021 and
disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table were
forfeited.
|
(7) |
Mr. Mehrotra terminated employment with CIRCOR on July 5, 2021. The
equity awards granted to Mr. Mehrotra in 2021 and disclosed in the
Summary Compensation Table were forfeited. |
2021 All Other Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Perquisites
and Other
Personal
Benefits (1)
|
Tax
Preparation
and
Financial
Planning
|
Life Insurance
Premiums
(2)
|
|
Payments
Relating to
Employee
Savings
Plan
(3)
|
Other
(4)
|
Total |
Scott Buckhout
|
$1,201 |
$— |
$1,200 |
|
$11,600 |
$— |
$14,001 |
Abhishek Khandelwal
|
$13,201 |
$— |
$1,200 |
|
$11,600 |
$— |
$26,001 |
Tony Najjar |
$1,201 |
$— |
$1,200 |
|
$11,600 |
$30 |
$14,031 |
Arjun Sharma
|
$9,601 |
$— |
$1,200 |
|
$11,600 |
$— |
$22,401 |
Jessica Wenzell |
$1,186 |
$— |
$1,104 |
|
$11,600 |
$— |
$13,890 |
Sumit Mehrotra
|
$5,128 |
$5,887 |
$626 |
|
$7,175 |
$48,671 |
$67,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The amounts shown in this column reflect each NEO’s annual car
allowance and the cost of group accident and disability insurance
that provides for higher coverage levels than generally available
to other employees.
|
(2) |
The amounts shown in this column reflect group term life insurance
premiums paid on behalf of each NEO.
|
|
|
(3) |
The amounts shown in this column reflect Company matching
contributions to each NEO’s 401(k) savings account of up to 4.0% of
eligible compensation subject to the limits imposed by IRS
regulations.
|
(4) |
For Mr. Mehrotra, the amount shown in this column reflects payment
for accrued vacation.
|
2021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table summarizes the grant of plan-based awards made
to our NEOs in 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Type of
Award (1)
|
Grant
Date
|
Approval Date |
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (2)
|
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (3)
|
All Other Stock
Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units
(#)
|
Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (4) (5)
|
Thresh-hold
($)
|
Target
($)
|
Maxi-mum
($)
|
Thresh-hold
(#)
|
Target
(#)
|
Maxi-mum
(#)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
(i)
|
(l)
|
Scott Buckhout
|
STI
|
|
|
445,500 |
891,000 |
2,673,000 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
PSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/3/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
19,180 |
38,359 |
76,718 |
— |
1,657,876 |
Time RSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/3/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
38,361 |
1,527,535 |
MSPP RSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/1/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
5,643 |
224,704.26 |
Abhishek Khandelwal
|
STI
|
|
|
154,000 |
308,000 |
924,000 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
PSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/3/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
3,029 |
6,057 |
12,114 |
|
261,784 |
Time RSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/3/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
6,057 |
241,190 |
Tony Najjar
|
STI
|
|
|
118,950 |
237,900 |
713,700 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
PSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/3/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
2,692 |
5,384 |
10,768 |
— |
232,696 |
Time RSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/3/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
5,385 |
214,431 |
MSPP RSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/1/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
771 |
30,701 |
Arjun Sharma
|
STI
|
|
|
111,300 |
222,600 |
667,800 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
PSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/3/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
2,692 |
5,384 |
10,768 |
— |
232,696 |
Time RSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/3/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
5,385 |
214,431 |
MSPP RSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/1/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2,004 |
79,799 |
Jessica Wenzell |
STI
|
|
|
117,000 |
234,000 |
702,000 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
PSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/3/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
1,683 |
3,365 |
6,730 |
— |
145,435 |
Time RSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/3/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3,366 |
134,034 |
Sumit Mehrotra
|
STI
|
|
|
127,350 |
254,700 |
764,100 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
PSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/3/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
2,692 |
5,384 |
10,768 |
— |
232,696 |
Time RSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/3/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
5,385 |
214,431 |
MSPP RSU
|
3/17/2021 |
3/1/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
841 |
33,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Type of Award:
|
|
"STI" refers to cash awards that are subject to performance
conditions under the STI Plan
|
|
"PSU" refers to RSU awards that are subject to performance
conditions
|
|
"Time RSU" refers to RSU awards that are subject to time-based
vesting only
|
|
"MSPP RSU" refers to the portion of Time RSU awards granted under
our Management Stock Purchase Plan (MSPP) that are attributable to
the 33% discounted purchase price. Each of our NEOs, other than Mr.
Khandelwal and Ms. Wenzell, elected to use a portion of his or her
short-term incentive bonus awarded under our 2020 STI Plan to
purchase Time RSUs at a price equal to 67% of the closing price of
our Common Stock on the business day prior to the date of grant.
See footnote (3) to the “Summary Compensation Table” for a
description of the actual amount of annual bonus earned by each of
the NEOs, the corresponding amount of each NEO’s bonus that was
used to purchase RSUs and the total number of RSUs
purchased.
|
|
The Time RSU, PSU, and MSPP RSU awards were granted under our LTI
Plan. See Summary Compensation Table and the footnotes thereto for
additional information on these types of awards.
|
(2) |
The amounts in these columns indicate the threshold, target and
maximum performance bonus amounts payable under our STI Plan prior
to deducting any amounts the NEO elected to use to purchase RSUs
under the MSPP. The potential bonus amounts payable under the STI
Plan are based on the achievement of specific financial performance
metrics. The NEOs would receive a bonus payout equal to 50% of
their target bonus at the threshold level of performance and 300%
of their target bonus at the maximum level of performance. If none
of the threshold performance metrics are met, no bonus would be
payable to the NEOs under the STI Plan unless otherwise determined
by the Compensation Committee.
|
(3) |
The amounts in these columns indicate the threshold, target and
maximum number of shares that the NEO could receive if an award
payout is achieved under the PSUs. These potential share amounts
are based on achievement of relative total shareholder return goals
compared to a specified index of small-sized industrial companies
during the performance period beginning on February 26, 2021 and
ending on February 29, 2024. The NEO would receive 50% of the
target number of shares at the threshold level of performance and
200% of the target number of shares at the maximum level of
performance. If the threshold performance target is not met, then
our NEOs will not receive any shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair
values of the PSUs reflected in column (g) and Time RSUs and MSPP
RSUs reflected in column (i), each calculated in accordance with
accounting guidance.
|
(5) |
Included in this column is the grant date fair value of the target
number of PSUs granted to each NEO, which we consider to be the
probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant
date. The following table shows for each NEO the grant date fair
value of the target number of PSUs granted to each such officer
that is included in the Summary Compensation Table and the grant
date fair value of the maximum number of PSUs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEO |
Target Number of PSUs
|
Grant Date Fair Value of Target Number of PSUs
|
Maximum Number of PSUs
|
Grant Date Fair Value of Maximum Number of PSUs
|
Scott Buckhout |
38,359 |
$1,657,876 |
$76,718 |
$3,315,752 |
Abhishek Khandelwal
|
6,057 |
$261,784 |
$12,114 |
$523,567 |
Tony Najjar |
5,384 |
$232,696 |
$10,768 |
$465,393 |
Arjun Sharma |
5,384 |
$232,696 |
$10,768 |
$465,393 |
Jessica Wenzell |
3,365 |
$145,435 |
$6,730 |
$290,871 |
Sumit Mehrotra |
5,384 |
$232,696 |
$10,768 |
$465,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The target number of PSUs awarded in 2021 is earned if our relative
total shareholder return goals are achieved during the performance
period beginning on February 26, 2021 and ending on February 29,
2024. The maximum number of PSUs that can be earned is two times
the target number of PSUs. See “Long Term Equity Incentives” in
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more
details.
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2021 Fiscal Year-End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
Name |
Type
of
Award
(1)
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable
(#)(2) |
Number of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options
Unexercisable (#) (2)
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying
unexercised unearned options (#)
|
Option Exercise Price
($)
|
Option Expiration
Date
|
Award
Grant
Date
|
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That
Have Not Vested (#)
|
Market Value
of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not
Vested
($) (3)
|
Equity Incentive Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or
Other
Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned
Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
(3)
|
(a) |
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
(i)
|
(j)
|
(k)
|
Scott Buckhout |
Perf Option
|
150,000 (4)
|
— |
— |
$41.17 |
4/09/2023
|
4/09/2013
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Option
|
39,141 |
— |
— |
$51.84 |
2/23/2022
|
2/23/2015
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Option
|
79,977 |
— |
— |
$38.89 |
2/23/2023
|
2/23/2016
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Option
|
55,788 |
— |
— |
$60.99 |
2/27/2024
|
2/27/2017
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Option
|
98,775 |
— |
— |
$42.62 |
3/05/2025
|
3/05/2018
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Option
|
38,711 |
77,422 |
— |
$33.63 |
3/04/2026
|
3/04/2019
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
MSPP RSU
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/04/2019
|
19,486 |
$529,629 (5) |
— |
— |
|
PSU
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/27/2020 |
— |
— |
68,445 |
$1,860,335 (6) |
|
Time RSU |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/27/2020 |
45,630 |
$1,240,223 (7) |
— |
— |
|
MSPP RSU
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/17/2021 |
17,100 |
$464,778 (5) |
— |
— |
|
PSU
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/17/2021 |
— |
— |
38,359 |
$1,042,598 (8) |
|
Time RSU |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/17/2021 |
38,361 |
$1,042,652 (7) |
— |
— |
Abhishek Khandelwal (9)
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Tony Najjar
|
Option
|
2,730 |
— |
— |
$38.89 |
2/23/2023
|
2/23/2016
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Option
|
1,449 |
— |
— |
$60.99 |
2/27/2024
|
2/27/2017
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Option
|
1,704 |
— |
— |
$42.62 |
3/05/2025
|
3/05/2018
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Option
|
2,816 |
1,408 |
— |
$33.63 |
3/04/2026
|
3/04/2019
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
MSPP RSU
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/04/2019
|
5,183 |
$140,874 (5) |
— |
— |
|
Time RSU
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/04/2019
|
496 |
$13,481 (7) |
— |
— |
|
PSU
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/27/2020 |
— |
— |
8,406 |
$228,475 (6) |
|
Time RSU |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/27/2020 |
5,604 |
$152,317 (7) |
— |
— |
|
MSPP RSU
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/17/2021 |
2,337 |
$63,520 (5) |
— |
— |
|
PSU
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/17/2021 |
— |
— |
5,384 |
$146,337 (8) |
|
Time RSU |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/17/2021 |
5,385 |
$146,364 (7) |
— |
— |
Arjun Sharma |
Option
|
2,799 |
— |
— |
$32.76 |
3/05/2022
|
3/05/2012
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Option
|
3,663 |
— |
— |
$51.84 |
2/23/2022
|
2/23/2015
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Option
|
8,406 |
— |
— |
$38.89 |
2/23/2023
|
2/23/2016
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Option
|
5,943 |
— |
— |
$60.99 |
2/27/2024
|
2/27/2017
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Option
|
2,760 |
— |
— |
$42.62 |
3/05/2025
|
3/05/2018
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Option
|
3,520 |
1760 |
— |
$33.63 |
3/04/2026
|
3/04/2019
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
MSPP RSU
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/04/2019
|
6,612 |
$179,714 (5) |
— |
— |
|
Time RSU
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/04/2019
|
620 |
$16,852 (7) |
— |
— |
|
PSU
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/27/2020 |
— |
— |
9,609 |
$261,173 (6) |
|
Time RSU |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/27/2020 |
6,406 |
$174,115 (7) |
— |
— |
|
MSPP RSU |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/17/2021 |
6,072 |
$165,037 (5) |
— |
— |
|
PSU
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/17/2021 |
— |
— |
5,384 |
$146,337 (8) |
|
Time RSU |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/17/2021 |
5,385 |
$146,364 (7) |
— |
— |
Jessica Wenzell |
Time RSU |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
11/9/2020 |
1,158 |
$31,474 (7) |
— |
— |
|
PSU
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/17/2021 |
— |
— |
3,365 |
$91,461 (8) |
|
Time RSU |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3/17/2021 |
3,366 |
$91,488 (7) |
— |
— |
Sumit Mehrotra (10) |
|
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Type of Award: |
|
"Time RSU" refers to RSU awards that are subject to time-based
vesting only |
|
"PSU" refers to RSU awards that are subject to performance
conditions |
|
"Perf Option" refers to inducement stock option awards that are
subject to a service period and a market vesting
condition |
|
"Option" refers to stock option awards that are subject to
time-based vesting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"MSPP RSU" refers to RSU awards subject to time-based vesting
pursuant to our Management Stock Purchase Plan |
|
With the exception of the Perf Option award to Mr. Buckhout on
April 9, 2013, which was granted as special inducement award under
Section 303A.08 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual), each of these
awards was granted under our 1999, 2014 or 2019 Stock Option and
Incentive Plans. |
(2) |
The Options listed in these columns were granted pursuant to our
Equity Incentive Plan in effect at the time of grant. The Option
grants on March 5, 2012 vested ratably 33% per year generally
beginning on the first anniversary from such date and have a
ten-year term. The Option grants on February 23, 2015, February 23,
2016, February 27, 2017, March 5, 2018 and March 4, 2019 vest
ratably 33% per year generally beginning on the first
anniversary from such date and have a seven-year term. |
(3) |
The amounts shown in these columns reflect the market value of
unvested RSUs calculated by multiplying the number of such unvested
RSUs by $27.18, the closing price of our Common Stock on
December 31, 2021. |
(4) |
On April 9, 2013, a special inducement stock option award of
200,000 shares was granted to Mr. Buckhout with an exercise price
of $41.17 per share. This stock option award includes both a
service period and a market vesting condition. In 2014, certain of
these targets were achieved and 150,000 shares vested and remain
exercisable. The remaining 50,000 shares were canceled during 2018
due to lack of performance achievement. |
(5) |
The amounts reflect the unvested portion of MSPP RSUs pursuant to
the MSPP provisions allowing executives to receive MSPP RSUs in
lieu of a specified percentage or dollar amount of their short-term
incentive cash bonus. Such MSPP RSUs vest in whole on the date that
is three years from the date of the grant, provided that the NEO is
then employed with the Company, at which time they convert into
shares of Common Stock and are issued to the executive unless the
executive has selected a longer deferral period. For example,
awards with a grant date of March 4, 2019 vest on March 4, 2022. To
the extent that an executive does not earn a vested benefit when
terminating employment before the scheduled vesting date, the
unvested MSPP RSUs are cancelled and the Company returns the
corresponding annual incentive cash bonus used to purchase those
MSPP RSUs plus interest at the one-year U.S. Treasury bill rate. If
all of the unvested MSPP RSUs disclosed in the table above were
cancelled on December 31, 2021 due to an NEO’s voluntary
resignation, the amount that would be required to be returned to
each NEO is as follows: Mr. Buckhout $909,564; Mr. Najjar $182,901;
and Mr. Sharma $315,831. In the event of retirement, disability or
an involuntary termination for any reason prior to the third
anniversary of the grant date, the NEO vests in a pro-rata amount
of the MSPP RSUs (based on number of full years that the NEO was
employed by the Company after the grant date divided by three), and
the remaining unvested MSPP RSUs would be cancelled for a return of
the corresponding bonus with interest. See the tables for each NEO
under the heading “Severance and Other Benefits Upon Termination of
Employment or Change of Control” for an estimate of these
amounts. |
(6) |
The amounts reflect the unvested portion of long-term incentive
grants in the form of PSUs pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan in
effect at the time of grant, including PSUs that did not meet the
performance threshold to vest on December 31, 2020 and December 31,
2021 but that remain eligible to vest on December 31, 2022. Such
grants are subject to financial performance conditions for the
three year period ending December 31, 2022 and reflect the target
amount of the award. |
(7) |
The amounts reflect the unvested portion of long-term incentive
grants in the form of Time RSUs pursuant to our Equity Incentive
Plan, in effect at the time of grant. Such grants generally vest
ratably over a three-year period, beginning on the first
anniversary of the date of grant, subject to any longer deferral
period selected by the executive. |
(8) |
The amounts reflect the unvested portion of long-term incentive
grants in the form of PSUs pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan in
effect at the time of grant. Such grants are subject to relative
total shareholder return conditions during the performance period
beginning on February 26, 2021 and ending on February 29, 2024 and
reflect the target amount of the award.
|
(9) |
Mr. Khandelwal terminated employment on December 31, 2021 and his
outstanding awards were forfeited immediately there
following. |
(10) |
Mr. Mehrotra terminated employment July 5, 2021 and had no
outstanding awards as of December 31, 2021. |
2021 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
|
Value Realized
on
Exercise ($)
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)(1)
|
Value Realized
on
Vesting ($)(2)
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
Scott Buckhout(3)
|
— |
— |
89,193 |
3,200,542 |
Abhishek Khandelwal(4)
|
— |
— |
14,837 |
$524,785 |
Tony Najjar(5)
|
— |
— |
19,173 |
710,587 |
Arjun Sharma(6)
|
— |
— |
23,616 |
864,945 |
Jessica Wenzell(7)
|
— |
— |
579 |
$16,461 |
Sumit Mehrotra(8)
|
4,506 |
$25,372 |
16,824 |
$611,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
With respect to shares acquired upon vesting of RSUs, NEOs have
shares withheld to pay associated income taxes. The number of
shares reported represents the gross number prior to withholding of
such shares. In certain cases, the actual receipt of shares
underlying vested RSUs may have been deferred pursuant to a
previous election made by the NEO. This table reports the number of
shares vested regardless of whether distribution actually was
made. |
(2) |
The amounts shown in this column reflect the value realized upon
vesting of Time RSUs, PSUs, and MSPP RSUs determined by multiplying
the number of share units that vested (prior to withholding of any
shares to pay associated income taxes) and the closing price of our
Common Stock on the day prior to vesting. The amounts reported
include the value of MSPP RSUs that were purchased with the
following Short-Term Incentive award amounts earned prior to 2021:
$208,495 for Mr. Buckhout, $26,339 for Mr. Najjar, $107,443 for Mr.
Sharma, and $93,110 for Mr. Mehrotra. |
(3) |
Mr. Buckhout had 30,020 RSUs vest on March 4, 2021 with a price of
$37.90, 7,301 MSPP RSUs and 29,057 PSUs vest on March 5, 2021 with
a price of $35.08, and 22,815 RSUs vest on April 27, 2021 with a
price of $34.51. |
(4) |
Mr. Khandelwal had 14,837 RSUs vest on April 2, 2021 with a price
of $35.37. |
(5) |
Mr. Najjar had 14,041 RSUs vest on March 4, 2021 with a price of
$37.90, 922 MSPP RSUs and 196 RSUs and 1,212 PSUs vest on March 5,
2021 with a price of $35.08, and 2,802 RSUs vest on April 27, 2021
with a price of $34.51. |
(6) |
Mr. Sharma had 13,589 RSUs vest on March 4, 2021 with a price of
$37.90, 3,762 MSPP RSUs and 1,100 RSUs and 1,962 PSUs vest on March
5, 2021 with a price of $35.08, and 3,203 RSUs vest on April 27,
2021 with a price of $34.51. |
(7) |
Ms. Wenzell had 579 RSUs vest on December 9, 2021 with a price of
$28.43. |
(8) |
Mr. Mehrotra exercised 4,506 stock options on March 10, 2021 with
an exercise price of $33.63 and a market price of $39.26.
Additionally, he had 7,998 RSUs vest on March 4, 2021 with a price
of $37.90, 3,209 MSPP RSUs and 392 RSUs and 2,423 PSUs vest on
March 5, 2021 with a price of $35.08, and 2,802 RSUs vest on April
27, 2021 with a price of $34.51. |
2021 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The Company sponsors a nonqualified deferred compensation plan to
provide benefits that would have otherwise been provided to
participants in our 401(k) plan but for the imposition of certain
maximum statutory limits imposed on qualified plans, such as annual
limits on eligible pay and contributions. The Company also may, in
its discretion, make the same contributions to the nonqualified
deferred compensation plan but only with respect to compensation in
excess of the annual limit of eligible pay. In 2021, the Company
elected not to make core contributions to the nonqualified deferred
compensation plan. Any contribution credits that we provided
to participants under the nonqualified deferred compensation plan
are invested in a rabbi trust, at the discretion of the plan
participants, in one or more mutual funds selected by the plan
participants.
The same mutual funds that we make available under our 401(k) plan
are also available under the nonqualified 401(k) excess plan and
there are no minimum or guaranteed rates of return to the
participants on such investments. Distributions from the
nonqualified deferred compensation plan are made in lump sum in
connection with a participant’s separation from
service.
As discussed above, our MSPP allows our NEOs to defer the payment
of their short-term incentive compensation in the form of RSUs. We
also permit the grantees of our MSPP RSUs to defer the settlement
of MSPP RSUs beyond the vesting date. The deferral period is a
stated period of years selected in advance by the grantee. In
general, if the grantee’s employment terminates before the end of
the deferral period for reasons other than retirement, the MSPP
RSUs will be settled in shares of our common stock upon termination
of employment. If the grantee retires before the end of the
deferral period, the MSPP RSUs will be settled in shares of our
common stock at the end of the deferral period. During the deferral
period, any dividends that would otherwise be paid on the deferred
MSPP RSUs accumulate in cash and will be paid out at the same time
that the deferred MSPP RSUs are settled. Information regarding
short-term incentive compensation that was used to purchase MSPP
RSUs is set forth in the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2021 Fiscal
Year-End Table.
Under either deferred compensation arrangement, if a distribution
is made on account of separation from service, the distribution
will be delayed by six months if the participant is considered a
specified employee within the meaning of Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code.
The following table outlines employee and employer contributions to
each deferred compensation arrangement for Fiscal Year 2021. The
table also includes earnings or losses during Fiscal Year 2021, and
the aggregate balances as of December 31, 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name (a)
|
Item
|
Executive
Contributions
in Last FY (b)(1)
|
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY (c)
|
Aggregate
Earnings/(Loss) in
Last FY (d) (2)
|
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions (e)
|
Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
(f) (3)
|
Scott Buckhout
|
Excess 401K
|
$120,808 |
$— |
$21,188 |
$— |
$250,047 |
Abhishek Khandelwal
|
Excess 401K
|
$— |
$— |
$— |
$— |
$— |
Tony Najjar
|
Excess 401K
|
$— |
$— |
$— |
$— |
$— |
Arjun Sharma
|
Excess 401K
|
$— |
$— |
$13,440 |
$— |
$96,040 |
Jessica Wenzell |
Excess 401K
|
$— |
$— |
$— |
$— |
|