Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to
Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
☑ |
Filed by the
Registrant |
☐ |
Filed by a party
other than the Registrant |
|
CHECK THE
APPROPRIATE BOX: |
☐ |
|
Preliminary Proxy
Statement |
☐ |
|
Confidential, for
Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2)) |
☑ |
|
Definitive Proxy
Statement |
☐ |
|
Definitive
Additional Materials |
☐ |
|
Soliciting
Material under §240.14a-12 |

3M Company
(Name of Registrant as
Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
PAYMENT OF FILING
FEE (CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY): |
☑ |
|
No fee
required |
☐ |
|
Fee paid
previously with preliminary materials |
☐ |
|
Fee computed on
table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules
14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 |
Table of Contents

Accelerating
our
transformation

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting
& Proxy Statement
Tuesday,
May 9, 2023
8:30
a.m., Central Daylight Time
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MMM2023
Table of Contents
A
letter to
our shareholders |
March
22, 2023
Dear
Shareholder:
On
behalf of the Board of Directors and our senior management team, we
are pleased to invite you to attend 3M’s Annual Meeting of
Shareholders on Tuesday, May 9, 2023, at 8:30 a.m., Central
Daylight Time at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MMM2023. To
leverage technology to enable shareholder participation from any
location, the 2023 Annual Meeting will be held exclusively
online.
2022
was an important year for 3M. The company focused on delivering for
customers and shareholders in a slowing macroeconomic environment,
while taking actions to position 3M for the future. As we managed
through external challenges — from supply chain disruptions, to
COVID-related lockdowns, to softening in key end markets — we
applied 3M science to solve customer needs, and introduce new
innovations across our market-leading businesses. We drove strong
pricing, proactively managed costs, strengthened our balance sheet
and reduced total debt by $1.4 billion — while returning $4.8
billion to shareholders through dividends and share
repurchases.
At the
same time, we continued to build 3M for long-term success. We
managed our portfolio — including the divestiture of our Food
Safety business, planned spin-off of our Health Care business, and
commitment to exit per- and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) manufacturing by
the end of 2025 — while advancing strategies to resolve legal
matters. We invested in growth and productivity, and followed
through on sustainability commitments. We supported employees with
new flexible work arrangements and factory investments, and
advanced diversity, equity, and inclusion with new initiatives from
each of our businesses.
We are
building a stronger company. Looking forward, our focus remains on
executing our strategic priorities and delivering the best
performance for our customers, shareholders, and all stakeholders
in 2023.
We
sincerely hope you will join us at our virtual Annual Meeting. You
will have a chance at the meeting to vote on the matters set forth
in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.
There will also be time for your questions and comments.
Shareholders who wish to submit questions in advance of the meeting
may do so by using their 16-digit control number to access
www.proxyvote.com.
For
information on how to attend the meeting, please read
“Participating in the virtual Annual Meeting” on page 110 of the
accompanying Proxy Statement.
Your
vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual
Meeting, please vote as soon as possible. You may vote your proxy
on the Internet, by telephone, or if this Proxy Statement was
mailed to you, by completing and mailing the enclosed traditional
proxy card. Please review the instructions on the proxy card or the
electronic proxy material delivery notice regarding each of these
voting options.
Thank
you for your ongoing support of 3M.
Sincerely,
 |

Michael
F. Roman
Chairman
of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
 |

Michael
L. Eskew
Lead
Independent Director
|
2023 Proxy
Statement 3
Table of Contents
Notice
of 2023
annual meeting of shareholders |
 |
Time and
Date
8:30 a.m.,
Central Daylight Time
Tuesday, May 9, 2023 |
|
|
|
 |
Where |
Virtual only
at
www.virtualshareholder
meeting.com/MMM2023 |
|
|
How to
vote |
Whether or not
you plan to attend the virtual meeting, please vote your proxy
either by using the Internet or telephone as further explained in
this Proxy Statement or by filling in, signing, dating, and
promptly mailing a proxy card. |
|
|
 |
By
Telephone |
In the U.S. or
Canada, you
may vote your shares toll-free
by calling 1-800-690-6903. |
|
|
 |
By
Internet |
You may vote
your shares
online at www.proxyvote.com. |
|
|
 |
By
Mail |
You may vote
by mail by
marking, dating, and signing
your proxy card or voting
instruction form and returning it
in the postage-paid envelope. |
|
|
|
By Online
Voting |
You may vote
online at the
virtual Annual Meeting. |
Important
Notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 9, 2023. |
The Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement, and 2022 Annual
Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. Enter the
16-digit control number located in the box next to the arrow on the
Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card to
view these materials.
THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND PROXY CARD, AND THE NOTICE OF INTERNET
AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS, ARE BEING DISTRIBUTED TO
SHAREHOLDERS ON OR ABOUT MARCH 22, 2023.
Record date
You are entitled to vote if you were a shareholder of record at the
close of business on Tuesday, March 14, 2023.
Adjournments and postponements
Any action on the items of business described above may be
considered at the Annual Meeting at the time and on the date
specified above or at any time and date to which the Annual Meeting
may be properly adjourned or postponed.
Annual report
Our 2022 Annual Report, which is not part of the proxy soliciting
materials, is enclosed if the proxy materials were mailed to you.
The Annual Report is accessible on the Internet by visiting
www.proxyvote.com, if you have received the Notice of
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or previously consented
to the electronic delivery of proxy materials.
By order of the Board of Directors,

Michael M. Dai
Vice
President, Associate General Counsel and Secretary
3M
Company
3M Center, St. Paul, Minnesota 55144
Attending the virtual Annual Meeting
To leverage technology to enable shareholder participation from
any location, the 2023 Annual Meeting will be held exclusively
online.
To be admitted to the Annual Meeting
at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MMM2023, you need to
enter the 16-digit control number on your proxy card, voting
instruction, or Notice of Internet Availability you previously
received. See additional instructions on page 110.
We have worked to offer the same
participation opportunities as were provided at the in-person
portion of our past meetings. At the virtual Annual Meeting, you or
your proxyholder may participate, vote and examine a list of
shareholders of record entitled to vote at the meeting by accessing
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MMM2023. If you wish to
submit questions in advance of the virtual meeting, you may do so
by using your 16-digit control number to access
www.proxyvote.com. During the virtual meeting, you may type
in your questions on the meeting website as well. See additional
instructions on page 111.
4 3M
Company
Table of Contents
2023 Proxy
Statement 5
Table of Contents
Special
Note About Forward-Looking Statements
This
proxy statement contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995,
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements involve risks and
uncertainties that could cause results to differ materially from
those projected. Please refer to the section entitled “Risk
Factors” in our Forms 10-K and 10-Q. The information contained
herein is as of the date of this proxy statement. We assume no
obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained
herein as a result of new information or future events or
developments, except as required by law.
No
Incorporation By Reference
This
proxy statement includes website addresses and references to
additional materials found on those websites. These websites and
materials are not incorporated by reference herein.
6 3M
Company
Table of Contents
Proposal
1 |
|
Elect the 10 Directors Identified
in this Proxy Statement (page
18) |

“FOR” each
nominee to
the Board
|
|
● Elect the 10 directors identified in this Proxy
Statement, each for a term of one year.
● Our nominees are distinguished leaders who
bring a mix of skills and qualifications to the Board and can
represent the interests of all shareholders.
● As proven leaders, our nominees are
well-positioned to guide 3M’s strategic directions.
● Our recent Board refreshment brings new skills
and experience to the Board and enhances its oversight of various
areas important to the Company.
|
Diversity of skills, experience and
perspective
The Nominating
and Governance Committee identifies, reviews, and recommends
nominees to the Board for approval. The Committee seeks individuals
with distinguished records of leadership and success and who will
make substantial contributions to Board operations and effectively
represent the interests of all shareholders. The Committee
considers a wide range of factors and experiences, including
ensuring an experienced, qualified Board with expertise in the
following key areas most relevant to 3M. The numbers indicated in
the diagram below represent the number of director nominees who the
Committee believes possess each of the skills and experiences.
 |
Leadership. Significant leadership experience with
understanding of complex global organizations, strategy, risk
management, and how to drive change and growth. |
|
 |
Finance. Financial metrics measures our performance. All
directors must understand finance and financial reporting
processes. All, but one, Audit Committee members qualify as “audit
committee financial experts.” |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Manufacturing. As a vertically integrated Company,
manufacturing experience is important to understanding the
operations and capital needs of the Company. |
|
 |
Global. Global business experience is critical to 3M’s
international growth with 60 percent of sales from outside the U.S.
in 2022. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Supply Chain. Directors with expertise in the management of
the upstream and downstream relationships with suppliers and
customers provide important perspectives on achieving efficient
operations. |
|
 |
Risk Management. Directors with experience in risk
management and oversight, including environmental, social, and
cybersecurity, play an important role in the Board’s oversight of
risks. |
|
|
 |
Technology. As a diversified technology, science-based
Company, directors with technology backgrounds understand 3M’s 51
technology platforms and the importance of investing in new
technologies for future growth. |
|
 |
Marketing. Organic growth is one of 3M’s financial metrics
and directors with marketing expertise provide important
perspectives on developing new markets. |
2023 Proxy
Statement 7
Table of Contents
Corporate governance
dashboard
Director nominees, board diversity of skills
and experience

8 3M
Company
Table of Contents

2023 Proxy
Statement 9
Table of Contents
The
Qualifications and Attributes, and Demographic Background
information below reflect the 10 Director Nominees for this Annual
Meeting.
Qualifications and
Attributes |
Brown |
Chow |
Dillon |
Eskew |
Fitterling |
Hood |
Kereere |
Page |
Pizarro |
Roman |
 |
Leadership |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
 |
Manufacturing |
■ |
|
|
■ |
■ |
|
|
■ |
|
■ |
 |
Supply Chain |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
 |
Technology |
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
|
■ |
■ |
 |
Finance |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
 |
Global |
■ |
■ |
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
 |
Risk Management |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
 |
Marketing |
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
|
|
Demographic Background |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenure (Years) |
10 |
<1 |
8 |
20 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
7 |
<1 |
5 |
Age (Years) |
67 |
56 |
71 |
73 |
61 |
51 |
57 |
71 |
57 |
63 |
Gender (Male/Female) |
M |
F |
M |
M |
M |
F |
F |
M |
M |
M |
Race/Ethnicity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
African American/Black |
■ |
|
|
|
|
|
■ |
|
|
|
Asian |
|
■ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hispanic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
■ |
|
Caucasian/White |
|
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
|
■ |
|
■ |
Corporate governance
highlights
Our Board’s Best
Practices
|
|
Annual director
elections
Diverse board in all
aspects
Effective lead
independent director
Regular board
refreshment with balanced mix of tenure
Regular shareholder
engagement
|
|
|
Committed to
sustainability and social responsibility
Extensive oversight of
environmental, social and enterprise risk management
Annual board, committee
and individual director self-evaluation
Annual “say-on-pay”
shareholder vote
|
|
|
Strong alignment
between company performance and executive compensation
Comprehensive clawback
policy
Annual compensation
risk assessment
Robust stock ownership
guidelines for executive officers and directors
|
Board refreshment
We regularly add
directors to infuse new ideas and fresh perspectives into the
boardroom. Four out of the nine independent director nominees
standing for this year’s election have joined our board within the
past five years, and all four have diverse traits, such as gender,
racial, or ethnic diversity. In recruiting directors, we focus on
how the experience and skill set of each individual complements
those of their fellow directors to create a balanced board with
diverse viewpoints and backgrounds, deep expertise, and strong
leadership experience.
10 3M
Company
Table of Contents
Shareholder outreach and
engagement
Shareholder
engagement is fundamental to our commitment to good governance and
essential to maintaining our strong corporate governance practices.
We engage regularly with our global investors to share updates on
our strategic, financial, and operating performance and to
understand valuable shareholder perspectives on governance and
sustainability issues about which they care most. We aim to seek a
collaborative and mutually beneficial approach to issues of
importance to investors that affect our business. Shareholder
feedback is shared with the appropriate Board committees or the
full Board to ensure our governance policies reflect priorities
that are important to our shareholders.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Participants |
|
|
Topics Discussed |
|
|
Feedback |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During
2022, members of senior management met with a cross-section of
shareholders owning approximately:

or
22% of our
outstanding
shares
33% of our
institutional
shareholders
Two of our directors — our Lead
Independent Director and Chairman of the Board — participated in
our 2022 engagement.
|
|
|
Board /
Corporate Governance
● Process related to health care business spin-off
● Board composition, including refreshment, skills
matrix, and diversity
● Director orientation, education, and evaluation
● Risk oversight (sustainability and
litigation/regulatory)
● Executive compensation
● Board interactions with management and broader
organization
Operations / Supply
Chain
● Current challenges, strategy, and business model
evolution
Environmental / Social /
Sustainability
● Carbon/water stewardship goals, plastics reduction,
investments, and pathway to achieve goals
Litigation
● PFAS and other litigation management
● Impact on culture
|
|
|
Investors
provided valuable comments and perspectives on the Company’s
governance practices, including the process related to the
Company’s planned spin-off of its health care business; the Board’s
overall diversity; director refreshment (including director skills
matrix); risk oversight; litigation management; and the Company’s
actions in managing supply chain challenges and environmental
stewardship, social justice, and sustainability matters, including
investments, progress towards goals, and the addition of an
environmental, social, and governance (ESG) modifier to the
Company’s executive compensation program.
The feedback from
these meetings was shared with the Board of Directors and helped
inform the Board on corporate governance practices and trends.
|
3M’s sustainability
highlights
At 3M, we are
people committed to helping other people. We seek to observe,
understand, and solve. Every day we help tackle problems, big and
small, in pursuit of our promise to improve lives. Our goals and
sustainability metrics reflect a heightened commitment to thinking
holistically about how our operations and products can unlock the
power of people, ideas, and science to reimagine what’s possible,
inspiring progress to transform aspirations into action and
delivering on our promises across science, society, and
sustainability.
In 2022, we
continued to follow through on our sustainability goals, including
our $1 billion commitment to achieve carbon neutrality, reduce
water use, improve water quality, and reduce our use of plastics.
Since announcing our carbon neutrality goal, we’ve seen an
additional 37.8 percent reduction of Scope 1 and 2 emissions
building from a 78.8 percent reduction over the last two decades
while more than doubling our revenue. We are also ahead of schedule
installing state-of-the-art filtration technologies around the
world, and we now have capabilities running at all three of our
largest water-using sites in the United States, and in Zwijndrecht.
Since 2021, we achieved a 54.2 million pound reduction in the
2023 Proxy
Statement 11
Table of Contents
use of virgin
fossil-based plastic in our packaging and products toward our goal
of 125 million pounds by 2025. We’ve incorporated recycled and
bio-based materials and reduced plastic use in products and
packaging such as tapes and dispensers, sponges, packaging,
workspace solutions, insulation, optical films, floor pads,
sorbents, and more.
We believe a
sustainable future is one in which ecosystems and communities
thrive and opportunities are equitable and accessible for all. We
advance meaningful actions toward a more equitable future for our
global employee base, including training, development, and
recruitment efforts focused on underrepresented populations. We
foster an inclusive culture that supports and appreciates
differences and provides fair and equal opportunities for everyone.
And we continue our efforts toward building a diverse workforce
around the world. We recognize the importance of equal access to
science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education
and careers. Equitable opportunities in STEM lead to stronger
communities, a stronger 3M, and a brighter collective future. To
advance our social justice and impact agenda, we created a 3M
Equity & Community organization to support our goals and
commitments to progress equity in our workplaces, business
practices, and communities globally. This holistic and
cross-functional organization connects our teams and strategies
across the areas of diversity and inclusion in our workforce;
3Mgives dedicated to building community partnerships and supporting
volunteerism with a focus on closing the opportunity gap for
underrepresented groups in STEM and skilled trades, and
administering our $50 million social justice fund; and Social
Justice Strategy & Initiatives dedicated to leading
workstreams across the enterprise to address policies and practices
advancing equitable societal solutions, including environmental
justice, supplier diversity, product development, and policy
advocacy.
We apply our
expertise to create bold ambitions to shape a sustainable future in
three priority areas: Science for Circular, Science for Climate,
and Science for Community.

Science for Circular
|
|
|

Science for Climate
|
|
|

Science for Community
|
We see the
circular economy as an opportunity to create impactful solutions,
inspire leadership, and implement disruptive change across all
industries. In September 2022, 3M was one of 85 global businesses,
financial institutions, and NGOs to endorse the Business Coalition
for a Global Plastics Treaty, a common vision for an effective and
ambitious global treaty to end plastic pollution. This vision will
guide policy engagements with governments to accelerate progress
toward a circular economy.
3M is on the
Water Resilience Coalition leadership committee joining other
leading companies to inspire others and accelerate our collective
impact. 3M is also taking steps to reduce water use and improve
water quality through installation of technologies at key
manufacturing sites worldwide. This includes a commitment to
install state-of-the art water purification technology at its
largest water-using facilities. Since 2019, we have reduced our
water usage by 16.8 percent indexed to net sales.
We continue to
advance our goal of 100 percent of products entering 3M’s new
product commercialization process to include descriptions of their
sustainability impact, such as an environmental or social challenge
like improving air quality, reducing GHG emissions, or improving
patient and worker safety.
|
|
|
We are advancing
our impact through bigger intermediate and long-term goals and
actions that align with the latest findings by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). During Climate
Week NYC, 3M solutions for decarbonization, electrification, energy
efficiency, and sustainable infrastructure were included in an
interactive display.
3M is in the
middle of a three-year partnership with the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to advance the
Paris Agreement and UN sustainable development goals. This
collaboration helps us highlight technology and solutions that
inspire forward movement on climate commitments.
Expanding our
access to opportunities to invest in climate technology companies,
3M is invested in TPG Rise Climate Fund, a multi-billion dollar
climate impact investing fund that deploys mission-driven capital
at scale.
Through select 3M
product platforms, we helped our customers avoid emitting over 121
metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the last five years alone.
Examples include helping customers in electronics, automotive, and
construction industries improve their energy efficiency and reduce
waste through the use of 3M materials and solutions.
|
|
|
We recognize the
importance of cultivating a connected community by listening,
understanding, and acting, bringing forward community voices and
perspectives to advise 3M on plans for directing a $50 million
investment to address racial opportunity gaps.
Since 2021, we’ve
supported over 1 million unique STEM and skilled trades learning
experiences, putting us well on track to deliver on our goal to
create 5 million such experiences by the end of 2025. Data from
3M’s State of Science Index (SOSI) helps guide our strategic STEM
investments with insights from across the globe.
In 2022, we
created the new role of director of environmental justice to
elevate and advance a global environmental justice program. We now
have a cohesive strategy and approach for working alongside
underserved communities, especially in areas where we have a
manufacturing presence.
In support of the
United Nations LGBTI Standards of Conduct for Business, 3M joined
other companies in committing to processes, policies, and programs
that promote equality and safety, prevent harassment and
discrimination, and advance LGBTQI+ individuals in the workplace
and the community.
|
12 3M
Company
Table of Contents
Proposal
2 |
|
Ratification of the Appointment of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for
2023 (page 51) |

“FOR”
|
|
● Ratify the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) as 3M’s independent registered
public accounting firm for 2023.
● Based on its assessment of the qualifications
and performance of PwC, the Audit Committee believes that it is in
the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to retain
PwC.
|
Executive
compensation
Proposal
3 |
|
Advisory Approval of Executive
Compensation
(page 55) |

“FOR”
|
|
● Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation
of our Named Executive Officers.
● Our executive compensation program
appropriately aligns our executives’ compensation with the
performance of the Company and its business units as well as their
individual performance.
|
2022 was a
pivotal year for 3M. The Company took decisive actions that are
foundational for our future, while maintaining an unwavering focus
on the priorities of our shareholders, the needs of our customers,
and our broader stakeholders.
Navigating macroeconomic
challenges
The combination
of ongoing litigation challenges together with significant external
uncertainties, including inflation, supply chain disruptions, and
slowing sales in key end-markets, impacted the Company’s total
shareholder return performance. In response, the Company took
action to address inflation through selling price actions,
proactively managed costs as demand softened throughout the year,
and continued to address litigation challenges. To address supply
chain disruptions, we did what was necessary to serve customers and
reduce cycle times. We also navigated COVID-related lockdowns in
China, reached agreement with the Flemish government to restart
operations in Zwijndrecht, and exited our Russian business.
Building a stronger, leaner, and a more
focused 3M
In 2022, we
delivered the following financial results:
● |
Organic sales growth of 1.2 percent, which included a 2.0 percent
headwind from the decline in disposable respirator demand and the
Russia exit; |
|
|
● |
Adjusted EPS of
$10.10;(1) |
|
|
● |
Adjusted free
cash flow of $4.7 billion;(1) |
|
|
● |
Adjusted free
cash flow conversion of 82 percent;(1) |
|
|
● |
Reduced total
debt by $1.4 billion to strengthen our balance sheet; and |
|
|
● |
Returned $4.8
billion to shareholders through dividends and share
repurchases. |
We divested our
Food Safety business, receiving approximately $1 billion in
consideration and reducing our outstanding share count by 16
million. We continued to progress the spin-off of our Health Care
business, which will create two world-class public companies, each
better positioned to drive growth and value creation. We also
simplified and streamlined our supply chain organization and
advanced our digital strategies to better serve customers.
(1) |
See
Appendix A to this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of adjusted
earnings per share, adjusted free cash flow, and adjusted free cash
flow conversion to our results for the most directly comparable
financial measures as determined in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP). |
2023 Proxy
Statement 13
Table of Contents
As always, we put
3M science to work to solve customer needs and continued to make
progress against our sustainability commitments to support employee
health, safety, and well-being — including new flexible work
arrangements and investments in our factories — and to advance
diversity, equity, and inclusion priorities throughout our
organization and the communities we serve.
Executive compensation program aligned with
shareholders
Despite many of
our positive financial and strategic results during 2022, as
previously mentioned, we also faced several business challenges
relating to ongoing litigation and an extremely fluid global
macroeconomic and geopolitical environment with slowing growth,
inflation, and supply chain disruptions. 3M’s executive
compensation program outcomes for 2022 reflected our slower than
expected growth with pay realized by the Company’s executives in
2022 closely aligned with the experience of
our shareholder.
● |
The
short-term incentive program paid out at 54 percent of target for
our CEO and between 40.3 percent and 84.8 percent of target for our
other Named Executive Officers; |
|
|
● |
The long-term
performance shares for the 2020-2022 performance period were earned
at 94.8 percent of target, which represented 84.4 percent of the
initial target grant value after considering the change in market
value of 3M’s common stock over the performance period and
accounting for the dividend equivalents associated with earned
performance shares; and |
|
|
● |
The Company’s
2022 performance also resulted in accruals significantly below
target, at 6.8 percent and zero percent of target, for the 2022
performance year of the outstanding 2021 performance share awards
(2021 – 2023 performance period, where 2022 performance is weighted
30 percent) and 2022 performance share awards (2022 – 2024
performance period, where 2022 performance is weighted 50 percent),
respectively. |
Performance
metrics used in 3M’s 2022 annual and long-term incentive programs
reflected sharpened focus on the Company’s performance against the
operating plan, cash flow growth, inventory, and receivables
performance to position us for the future. The Compensation and
Talent Committee also approved a new ESG performance payout
modifier for the 2022 annual incentive program to support progress
toward 3M’s sustainability priorities and updated the benchmark
used for the relative performance metric in the 2022-2024 long-term
incentive program to improve alignment with 3M’s business
portfolio.
As we enter 2023,
we are taking decisive actions to streamline the organization and
improve our manufacturing and supply chain operations. We are
staying close to our customers and continuing to invest in
innovation as we forge the foundation for 3M’s sustainable growth
built on the strength of 3M’s people, industry-leading innovation,
advanced manufacturing, global capabilities, and our iconic
brands.
14 3M
Company
Table of Contents
Recent business
accomplishments
Below
are a few noteworthy accomplishments from January 1, 2022, through
March 1, 2023.

Performance
|
|
● 2022
organic sales growth of 1.2 percent, $10.10 adjusted earnings per
share, adjusted free cash flow of $4.7 billion with adjusted free
cash flow conversion of 82 percent, while focusing on our customers
and managing through an uncertain global macroeconomic and
geopolitical environment*
● Maintained
strong spending discipline, addressed inflation through selling
price actions, and drove operational improvements to address supply
chain challenges
|
|
● Strengthened
the balance sheet providing financial flexibility, reduced total
debt by $1.4 billion, while returning $4.8 billion to shareholders
in 2022 via dividends and gross share repurchases
● Over
105 consecutive years of paying dividends to shareholders and 65
consecutive years of ordinary dividend increases
*See
Appendix A to this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of these
non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measures.
|
|
|
|
|
|

Innovating for
the future
|
|
● Continued
to innovate for customers and capitalize on growth, productivity,
and sustainability opportunities
● Invested
$3.6 billion in the combination of research and development and
capital expenditures to position 3M for the future, including
investments focused on growth, productivity, and sustainability —
particularly water and air stewardship
● 3M
innovation reduced customer greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by
helping avoid emitting over 121 million metric tons of
CO2 equivalent. At the same time, reduced 54.2 million
pounds of virgin fossil-based plastic use in products and
packaging
|
|
● Launched
139 new products across our four market-leading business
groups
● Awarded
a total of 2,600 patents from patent offices around the world in
2022, including 562 patents granted to 3M by the United States
Patent and Trademark Office, which brings to nearly 132,000 total
patents awarded to 3M since our inception
● Invested
in projects to reduce water usage, install purification technology
at largest water-using locations and return higher quality water to
the environment after usage
|

Portfolio
management
|
|
● Announced
the spin-off of our Health Care business with a focus on creating a
leading global diversified healthcare company and a more focused
3M
● Enhanced
shareholder value through active portfolio management, including
the divestiture of our Food Safety business, consumer skin care
brands Neobun™ and Neoplast™ in Thailand, and
floor care products business in Europe, and the acquisition of
LeanTec’s technology assets to advance digital solutions for auto
body shops
● Prioritized
investments in growth, productivity, and sustainability
|
|
● Continued
to invest in growth opportunities, aligned to global trends that
take best advantage of 3M innovation, including in automotive
electrification, industrial automation, biopharma processing, and
home improvement
● Following
through on sustainability commitments: investing $1 billion over 20
years to accelerate air and water stewardship and plastics
reduction goals
● Committed
to exit PFAS manufacturing by the end of 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|

Transforming
3M operating
model
|
|
● Advanced
our business group-led operating model, including simplifying and
streamlining our organization and further aligning to customers and
go-to-market models for improved growth, operating agility, and
accountability |
|
● Focused
on transformation including adjusting our operations and supply
chain structure to the changing economic realities and advancing
our digital strategies to better serve customers and improve
efficiency of operations |
|
|
|
|
|

People and
culture
|
|
● Advanced
diversity, equity, and inclusion within 3M and its communities with
new investments and initiatives; issued annual diversity, equity,
and inclusion report to strengthen accountability and
transparency
● Continued
to focus on employee health, safety, and well-being, including new
flexible work arrangements and factory investments
|
|
● Honored
by Ethisphere® Institute as one of “The World’s Most
Ethical Companies®” for the 9th consecutive
year
● Recognized
as one of the “25 incredible companies that are building the best
workplace cultures in the world.” 3M also secured 15 National Best
Workplaces™ Awards
|
2023
Proxy Statement 15
Table of Contents
Elements of 2022
target total direct compensation
The
table below shows how the 2022 target Total Direct Compensation of
the Named Executive Officers identified on page 57 (NEOs) was
apportioned among base salary, annual incentives, performance share
awards, stock options, and restricted stock units (RSUs),
summarizes the rationale for providing each such element, and lists
the performance metrics, weightings, and modifiers used for annual
and long-term incentives granted in 2022.
|
|
|
|
2022
Pay Elements(1) |
|
|
|
2022
Performance Metrics, Weightings, and
Modifiers(2) |
|
|
|
|
CEO |
Other
NEOs |
|
Why
It Is Provided |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
● Compensate
executives for their normal day-to-day responsibilities |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
● Motivate
executives to stay focused on day-to-day operations by aligning a
significant portion of Total Cash Compensation with the near-term
financial performance of the Company and its business
units |
|
● Local
Currency Sales (of 3M or a business unit, as applicable) vs. Plan
(50%)
● Operating
Income (of 3M or a business unit, as applicable) vs. Plan
(30%)
● 3M
Operating Cash Flow Conversion vs. Plan (20%)
● Individual
performance (± 20%)
● ESG
modifier (± 10% of target)
|
|
|
Performance
Shares |
|
● Motivate
executives to focus on continuously improving performance in key
financial metrics believed to drive long-term shareholder
value
● Retain
executive talent
|
|
● Earnings
per Share Growth (33.3%)
● Free
Cash Flow Growth (33.3%)
● Relative
Organic Sales Growth (33.3%)
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
Stock
Options(3) |
|
● Motivate
executives to build long-term shareholder value
● Retain
executive talent
|
|
● Vesting
is based on continued service, while value of the options is based
on stock price appreciation (100%) |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
Restricted
Stock Units(3) |
|
● Motivate
executives to build long-term shareholder value
● Retain
executive talent
|
|
● Vesting
is based on continued service, while value of the RSUs is based on
total shareholder return (100%) |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
(1) |
Percentages
shown reflect the apportionment (or, in the case of the percentages
shown for the Other NEOs, the average apportionment) of the
components of target total direct compensation that are expected to
be recurring. Such amounts do not reflect special items such as
hiring bonuses, one-time make-whole and inducement awards granted
in connection with the commencement of employment, or retention
awards. The percentages shown for the Other NEOs also do not
reflect items provided to Ms. Poul, who retired in 2022. If Ms.
Poul had been included, the percentages shown would have been as
follows: Base Salary — 16%; AIP — 16%; PSAs — 34%; Stock Options —
17%; and RSUs — 17%. Numbers may not add to 100 percent due to
rounding. |
(2) |
In
determining the level of achievement of the performance goals
established under the AIP and the performance share awards for any
given period, the costs, sales and impact on assets and liabilities
from acquisitions are excluded in the year that the acquisition is
completed. The Compensation and Talent Committee also makes other
adjustments from time to time for special items that it believes
are unrelated to the operational performance of the Company for the
relevant measurement period (e.g., changes in tax laws or
accounting principles, asset write-downs, the impact of
restructurings, divestitures, or asset sales, unusual tax
transactions, litigation or claim judgments and settlements, and
other special items described in management’s discussion and
analysis of financial conditions and results of operations
appearing in the Company’s annual/quarterly report to shareholders
for the applicable period). These adjustments can have either a
positive or negative impact on award payouts. |
(3) |
For the
Company’s CEO, the Compensation and Talent Committee chose to
deliver 50 percent of the target grant value of his annual
long-term incentive awards in the form of performance shares and
the remaining 50 percent in the form of stock options. Each of the
Company’s other executives was given an opportunity to indicate a
preference to receive 50 percent of the target grant value of their
annual long-term incentive awards in the form of RSUs, stock
options, or an equal split of both stock options and RSUs.
Regardless of an executive’s indicated preference, the remaining 50
percent of the target grant value of his or her 2022 annual
long-term incentive awards was delivered in the form of performance
shares. The percentages shown reflect the apportionment of stock
options and RSUs based on the elections for 2022 made by the NEOs
(other than our CEO, who was not offered an opportunity to make an
election). |
16 3M
Company
Table of Contents
Say-on-pay results
3M has
a history of strong say-on-pay results. As it has in past years,
the Compensation and Talent Committee will consider the results of
this year’s say-on-pay proposal, as well as feedback from our
shareholders, when making future executive compensation
decisions.
For
information concerning our investor outreach efforts, see
“Shareholder outreach and engagement” on page 11.
|
|
3-year
average
votes cast in favor
of say-on-pay
proposal |
 |
Recent noteworthy
compensation program actions
Since
January 1, 2022, the Compensation and Talent Committee took the
noteworthy actions described below as part of the Company’s
executive compensation program.
● |
Effective
for the 2022 annual incentive compensation program offered to
eligible employees, updated the metrics and weightings with the
intent of sharpening focus on performance against the operating
plan, prioritizing operating cash flow conversion as a key driver
of operating value, and enhancing focus on inventory and
receivables performance. For more information about the new design,
see “Annual incentive” on page 71. |
|
|
● |
Added a
new ESG modifier to the formula used to calculate the annual
incentive compensation earned by the Company’s senior executives,
including our Named Executive Officers. Beginning in 2022, amounts
earned by the Company’s senior executives may be increased 10
percent of target, decreased 10 percent of target, or left
unchanged based on the Compensation and Talent Committee’s
assessment of 3M’s performance against a selection of pre-set goals
ESG goals. For more information about the new ESG modifier, see
“Annual incentive — ESG Modifier” on page 72. |
|
|
● |
Effective
for grants made to executives in 2022, updated the metrics,
weightings, and certain other aspects of the Company’s performance
share awards. The changes generally are intended to strengthen the
link to value creation for 3M in the current environment and better
align the macro benchmark used as the basis of the relative metric
with 3M’s business portfolio. For more information, see “Long-term
incentives — 2022 performance share awards” on page 72. |
|
|
● |
Beginning
with the annual grants made in 2022, increased (from 25 percent to
50 percent) the portion of the target grant value that the
Company’s executives (other than our CEO) may ask to receive in the
form of stock options, restricted stock units, or a combination of
both. Regardless of an executive’s indicated preference, the
remaining 50 percent of the target grant value of his or her
annual long-term incentive awards was delivered in the form of
performance shares. |
|
|
● |
Effective
August 11, 2022, amended the Executive Severance Plan to cap at
target the amount of any payment under the Annual Incentive Plan
that relates to the period following the participant’s termination
of employment. |
Proposal
4
|
|
Advisory
Approval on the Frequency of Advisory Votes on Executive
Compensation (page 56) |

Every
“1 year”
|
|
● Approve,
on an advisory basis, the frequency at which the Company holds
advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive
officers.
● The
Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote in favor of
conducting an advisory vote on executive compensation every “1
year.”
|
2023
Proxy Statement 17
Table of Contents
Corporate
governance at 3M |
Proposal
1
|
|
Elect
the 10 Directors Identified in this Proxy Statement |

“FOR” each
nominee to
the Board
|
|
● Elect
the 10 directors identified in this Proxy Statement, each for a
term of one year.
● Our
nominees are distinguished leaders who bring a mix of skills and
qualifications to the Board and can represent the interests of all
shareholders.
|

18 3M
Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate
governance at 3M |
At the 2023
Annual Meeting, 10 directors are to be elected to hold office until
the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors
have been elected and qualified. All nominees are presently 3M
directors who were elected by shareholders at the 2022 Annual
Meeting, except for Ms. Anne H. Chow and Mr. Pedro J. Pizarro, both
of whom joined the board on February 9, 2023 and are standing for
election for the first time. A director search firm assisted with
the identification of Ms. Chow and Mr. Pizarro for recommendation
by the Nominating and Governance Committee for their election to
the Board. We expect each nominee for election as a director to be
able to serve if elected. If any nominee is not able to serve,
proxies will be voted in favor of the remainder of those nominated
and may be voted for substitute nominees, unless the Board chooses
to reduce the number of directors serving on the Board. Each
nominee elected as a director will continue in office until his or
her successor has been elected and qualified, or until his or her
earlier death, resignation, or retirement. Pamela J. Craig, Muhtar
Kent, and Dambisa F. Moyo are not seeking re-election for personal
reasons unrelated to the Company and will retire from their service
on the 3M Board on May 9, 2023, when their terms expire. We thank
Ms. Craig, Mr. Kent, and Ms. Moyo for their many contributions to
the Board and to the Company. The decision of three directors not
to stand for re-election dovetails with the Company’s objective of
maintaining its more traditional board size. With two new directors
elected to the Board as of February 9, 2023, no additional director
replacements are being announced at this time. The Company will
continue to refresh its Board of Directors regularly with the
skills and experiences deemed most critical for setting strategic
objectives and positioning 3M to drive long-term shareholder value.
In addition, the Board has appointed two new committee chairs. As
of April 5, 2023, Thomas K. Brown will chair the Nominating and
Governance Committee and James R. Fitterling will chair the
Compensation and Talent Committee.
The
Nominating and Governance Committee reviewed the Board Membership
Criteria (described on page 26) and the specific experience,
qualifications, attributes, and skills of each nominee, including
membership(s) on the boards of directors of other public companies.
The following pages contain biographical and other information
about the nominees. Following each nominee’s biographical
information, we have provided information concerning the particular
experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills that are deemed
most critical to 3M’s long-term success and led the Nominating and
Governance Committee and the Board to determine that each nominee
should serve as a director. In addition, the majority of our
directors serve or have served on boards and board committees
(including as committee chairs) of other public companies, which
the Board believes provides them with additional board leadership
and governance experience, exposure to best practices, and
substantial knowledge and skills that further enhance the
functioning of our Board.
2023 Proxy
Statement 19
Table of Contents
Corporate
governance at 3M |
|
Nominees for
director
|
|
|

Age 67
Director since 2013
Other current directorships
● ConAgra Foods, Inc.
3M Board committee(s)
●
Audit
● Nominating and Governance (Chair-elect)
Directorships within the past five
years
● Tower International, Inc.
|
|
Thomas
“Tony” K. Brown Independent
Retired Group Vice President, Global Purchasing, Ford Motor
Company
Professional
Highlights
Mr. Brown is the Retired Group Vice President, Global
Purchasing, Ford Motor Company, a global automotive industry
leader. Mr. Brown served in various leadership capacities in
global purchasing since joining Ford in 1999. In 2008, he became
Ford’s Group Vice President, Global Purchasing, with responsibility
for approximately $90 billion of production and non-production
procurement for Ford operations worldwide. He retired from Ford on
August 1, 2013. From 1997 to 1999 he served in leadership positions
at United Technologies Corporation, including its Vice President,
Supply Management. From 1991 to 1997 he served as Executive
Director, Purchasing and Transportation at QMS Inc. From 1976 to
1991 he served in various managerial roles at Digital Equipment
Corporation.
Nominee
Qualifications
Mr. Brown’s bachelor’s degree in
business administration from American International College in
Springfield, Massachusetts, his leadership roles, including his
experience serving as a director of the public companies listed,
and his knowledge of and extensive experiences in global
purchasing, management, and supply chain at Ford Motor Company and
other companies, qualify him to serve as a director of 3M.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Age
56
Director since
2023
Other current directorships
● Franklin Covey Co. (lead independent
director)
3M Board committee(s)
● Compensation and Talent
● Science, Technology &
Sustainability
|
|
Anne H.
Chow Independent
Retired Chief Executive Officer, AT&T Business
Professional
Highlights
Ms. Chow is the retired Chief Executive Officer of AT&T
Business, which provides solutions to businesses across all
industries as well as the public sector. She is also the
founder and CEO of The Rewired CEO, a business service firm, and
serves as Adjunct Professor of Executive Education at the Kellogg
School of Management, Northwestern University. Ms. Chow served as
the CEO of AT&T Business from 2019 to 2022 after having served
in various executive leadership positions at AT&T since 2000,
including President — National Business, President — Integrator
Solutions, and Senior Vice President — Premier Client Group. At
AT&T Business, Ms. Chow was responsible for nearly 3 million
business customers in more than 200 countries and territories
around the world, including nearly all the world’s Fortune 1000
companies. Her responsibilities encompassed AT&T’s full suite
of business services across wireless, networking, cybersecurity,
and advanced solutions, covering more than $35 billion in revenues
with an organization of over 35,000 people. She has a long track
record of community leadership involvement in board and advisory
roles at organizations such as the Girl Scouts of the USA, New
Jersey Chamber of Commerce, and the Asian American Justice Center.
Reflective of her impact in driving success at the intersection of
people, culture, and technology, Ms. Chow was named to Fortune’s
Most Powerful Women in Business twice, Forbes inaugural CEO Next
List of Leaders set to revolutionize American business, and
recognized with Linkage’s Legends in Leadership Award.
Nominee
Qualifications
Ms. Chow’s master’s degree in
business administration from Cornell University, her bachelor’s and
master’s degrees in electrical engineering from Cornell University,
her decades of executive leadership positions at AT&T,
including as CEO of AT&T Business, and her extensive global and
cross-functional experience in management, technology,
cybersecurity, marketing and sales, operations, strategy, business
and culture transformation, finance, and ESG matters, as well as
her experience as a director at another public company, qualify her
to serve as a director of 3M.
|
20
3M Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate
governance at 3M |
|
|
|

Age 71
Director since
2015
Other current directorships
● Union Pacific Corporation
3M Board committee(s)
● Audit (Chair)
● Nominating and Governance
|
|
David
B. Dillon Independent
Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, The
Kroger Co.
Professional
Highlights
Mr. Dillon is the Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, The Kroger Co., a large retailer that operates
retail food and drug stores, multi-department stores, jewelry
stores, and food production facilities throughout the U.S. Mr.
Dillon retired on December 31, 2014 as Chairman of the Board of
Kroger, where he was Chairman since 2004 and was the Chief
Executive Officer from 2003 through 2013. Mr. Dillon served as
President of Kroger from 1995 to 2003 and was elected Executive
Vice President in 1990. Mr. Dillon served as Director of The Kroger
Co. from 1995 through 2014. Mr. Dillon began his retailing career
at Dillon Companies, Inc. (later a subsidiary of The Kroger Co.) in
1976 and advanced through various management positions, including
its President from 1986-1995.
Nominee
Qualifications
Mr. Dillon’s bachelor’s degree in
business from the University of Kansas and his law degree from
Southern Methodist University, his leadership roles and experiences
at The Kroger Co., including serving as Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer, his knowledge of and extensive experiences
in leading one of the world’s largest retailers, his experiences in
Kroger’s successful $13 billion merger with Fred Meyer, Inc., his
leadership in sustainability, his skills in financial and audit
matters, and his experiences as a director at the public companies
listed, qualify him to serve as a director of 3M.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Age 73
Director since
2003
Other current directorships
● None
3M Board committee(s)
● Audit
● Compensation and Talent
Directorships within the past five
years
● The Allstate Corporation
● Eli Lilly and Company
● International Business Machines
Corporation
|
|
Michael
L. Eskew Independent
Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Professional
Highlights
Mr. Eskew is the Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), a provider of
specialized transportation and logistics services. Mr. Eskew
was appointed Executive Vice President in 1999 and Vice Chairman in
2000 before becoming Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of UPS in
January 2002. He retired as Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer at the end of 2007 but remained as a director of
UPS until December 31, 2014.
Nominee
Qualifications
Mr. Eskew’s bachelor’s degree in
industrial engineering from Purdue University, his leadership roles
and experiences at UPS, including serving as Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer, his knowledge of and extensive
experiences in global logistics, his skills in financial and audit
matters, and his experiences as a director at the public companies
listed, qualify him to serve as a director of 3M. Mr. Eskew is our
Lead Independent Director.
|
2023 Proxy
Statement 21
Table of Contents
Corporate
governance at 3M |
|
|
|
|

Age 61
Director since
2021
Other current directorships
● Dow Inc.
3M Board committee(s)
● Compensation and Talent (Chair-elect)
|
|
James
R. Fitterling Independent
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Dow Inc.
Professional
Highlights
Mr. Fitterling is the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Dow Inc., one of the world’s leading global
materials science companies. Mr. Fitterling was named CEO-elect
of Dow in March 2018 prior to becoming CEO in July 2018, and he was
elected Chairman in April 2020. Before that, he served as President
and Chief Operating Officer of Dow and also previously served as
Chief Operating Officer for the Materials Science division of
DowDuPont. In his 37-year career with the company, Mr. Fitterling
has spent 10 years in Asia, and has held leadership positions with
P&L responsibility in many of the company’s operations. A
strong advocate for inclusion and diversity, Mr. Fitterling was
named # 1 LGBT + Executive in 2018 on the “OUTstanding in Business”
list published by Financial Times. Mr. Fitterling serves as
the Chair of the Board of Directors of the National Association of
Manufacturers and immediate past Chair of the Board of Directors
for the American Chemistry Council.
Nominee
Qualifications
Mr. Fitterling’s bachelor’s degree in
mechanical engineering from the University of Missouri — Columbia,
his extensive leadership roles and experiences at Dow, including
serving as its Chairman and CEO, his many years of international
business experiences, his deep understanding and appreciation of
materials science and innovation, and his strong track record of
advancing environmental, social and governance goals, qualify him
to serve as a director of 3M.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Age 51
Director since
2017
Other current directorships
● None
3M Board committee(s)
● Compensation and Talent
● Science, Technology &
Sustainability
|
|
Amy E.
Hood Independent
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Microsoft
Corporation
Professional
Highlights
Ms. Hood is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Microsoft Corporation, a worldwide provider of software,
services and solutions. Ms. Hood is responsible for leading
Microsoft’s worldwide finance organization, including acquisitions,
treasury activities, tax planning, accounting and reporting, and
internal audit and investor relations. Prior to this role, Ms. Hood
was Chief Financial Officer of Microsoft’s Business Division,
responsible for the company’s productivity applications and
services including Microsoft Office 365, Office, SharePoint,
Exchange, Dynamics ERP and Dynamics CRM. During her time in the
Business Division, Ms. Hood helped lead the transition to the
company’s Office 365 service, and she was deeply involved in the
strategy development and overall execution of the company’s
successful acquisitions of Skype and Yammer. Ms. Hood joined
Microsoft in 2002 and previously held positions in the Server and
Tools Business as well as the corporate finance organization. Prior
to 2002, she worked at Goldman Sachs & Co. in various
investment banking and capital markets groups roles.
Nominee
Qualifications
Ms. Hood’s bachelor’s degree in
economics from Duke University and M.B.A. from Harvard University,
her extensive leadership roles and experiences at Microsoft
Corporation, especially in strategic business development, finance,
and digitization, qualify her to serve as a director of 3M.
|
22
3M Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate
governance at 3M |
|
|
|

Age 57
Director since
2022
Other current directorships
● None
3M Board committee(s)
● Compensation and Talent
|
|
Suzan
Kereere Independent
Head of Global Business Solutions, Fiserv, Inc.
Professional
Highlights
Ms. Kereere is the Head of Global Business Solutions, Fiserv,
Inc., a global fintech and payments company with solutions for
banking, global commerce, merchant acquiring, billing and payments,
and point-of-sale. Most recently, she served as Chief Growth
Officer at Fiserv, leading enterprise strategy and business
development initiatives. Prior to Fiserv, she held executive
leadership roles in global merchant sales and acquiring at VISA
from 2016 to 2021 and in merchant services, network business,
customer services, business and corporate travel, including serving
as head of U.S. National Merchant Business and head of Global
Network Business at American Express where she worked from 1988 to
2016. She has led businesses in Europe, Australia, Asia and North
America. Ms. Kereere is a director at Electronic Transactions
Association.
Nominee
Qualifications
Ms. Kereere’s bachelor’s degree in
Economics from Tufts University and M.B.A. degree from Columbia
University Business School, her decades of experience and expertise
in leading payments and technology platform business at Fortune 100
companies across global business lines and regional high growth
start-ups, her accomplishments in digital transformation, sales
optimization, front-line customer engagement and inclusive growth,
and her track record of championing for equity in the corporate
space and bringing analytics to the race and inclusion discussion,
qualify her to serve as a director of 3M.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Age 71
Director since
2016
Other current directorships
● Deere & Company
● Eaton Corporation plc
● Corteva Agriscience
(non-executive chair)
3M Board committee(s)
● Compensation and Talent
● Science, Technology & Sustainability
(Chair)
|
|
Gregory
R. Page Independent
Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,
Cargill
Professional
Highlights
Mr. Page is the Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, Cargill, an international marketer, processor
and distributor of agricultural, food, financial and industrial
products and services. Mr. Page was named Corporate Vice
President & Sector President, Financial Markets and Red
Meat Group of Cargill in 1998, Corporate Executive Vice President,
Financial Markets and Red Meat Group in 1999, President and Chief
Operating Officer in 2000, and became Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer in 2007. He served as Executive Chairman of
the Board of Cargill from December 2013 until his retirement from
Cargill in September 2015, and Executive Director of Cargill from
September 2015 to September 2016. Mr. Page was a director and past
non-executive Chair of the Board of Big Brothers Big Sisters of
America, retiring in 2022. He is past President and board member of
the Northern Star Council of the Boy Scouts of America. Mr. Page is
a board member at Alight, a nonprofit company serving primarily
refugees and displaced people.
Nominee
Qualifications
Mr. Page’s bachelor’s degree in
economics from the University of North Dakota, his leadership roles
and experiences while serving as Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer at Cargill, his expertise and knowledge of
financial and audit matters and corporate governance, and his
experiences as a director at the public companies listed, qualify
him to serve as a director of 3M.
|
2023 Proxy Statement
23
Table of Contents
Corporate
governance at 3M |
|
|
|
|

Age 57
Director since
2023
Other current directorships
●
Edison International
3M Board committee(s)
●
Audit
|
|
Pedro
J. Pizarro Independent
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director, Edison
International
Professional
Highlights
Dr. Pizarro has been President and Chief Executive Officer of
Edison International, the parent company of Southern California
Edison (SCE), one of the nation’s largest electric utilities,
since 2016. Edison International is also the parent company of
Edison Energy, a portfolio of competitive businesses providing
commercial and industrial customers with energy management and
procurement services. Prior to that, he served as President of SCE
from 2014 to 2016. From 2011 to 2014, Dr. Pizarro served as
President of Edison Mission Energy, an indirect subsidiary of
Edison International until the sale of its principal assets in
2014. He has held a wide range of other senior executive positions
at the Edison International companies since joining in 1999,
including Executive Vice President responsible for SCE’s
transmission and distribution system, power procurement and
generation. Dr. Pizarro also previously served as Vice President
and Senior Vice President of Power Procurement, and Vice President
of Strategy and Business Development. Dr. Pizarro is a vice
chairman of the Edison Electric Institute, a director of the
Electric Power Research Institute, a member of the Electricity
Subsector Coordinating Council, and a Trustee of the California
Institute of Technology. Prior to his work at the Edison
International companies, Dr. Pizarro was a senior engagement
manager with McKinsey & Company.
Nominee
Qualifications
Dr. Pizarro’ bachelor’s degree in
chemistry from Harvard University, his Ph.D. in chemistry from the
California Institute of Technology, his extensive leadership
experiences with Edison International, including as President and
Chief Executive Officer, his extensive board service, and his
knowledge and experiences with leadership, risk management,
technology, safety and operations, workforce management,
cybersecurity, regulatory and government affairs, business
resiliency, mergers and acquisitions, and strategic planning
qualify him to serve as a director of 3M.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Age 63
Director since
2018
Other current directorships
●
Abbott Laboratories
3M Board committee(s)
●
None
|
|
Michael
F. Roman
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, 3M
Company
Professional
Highlights
Mr. Roman is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of 3M Company since May 2019. Mr. Roman previously
served as Chief Executive Officer from July 1, 2018 to May 14,
2019; Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President from
July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018 with direct responsibilities for 3M’s
five business groups and the Company’s international operations.
Mr. Roman previously served as Executive Vice President, Industrial
Business Group, of 3M Company from June 2014 to July 2017. Mr.
Roman served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Business
Development, from May 2013 to June 2014. Prior to that, he was Vice
President and General Manager of Industrial Adhesives and Tapes
Division from September 2011 to May 2013. Mr. Roman also has lived
in and led 3M businesses around the world, including the United
States, Europe, and Asia.
Nominee
Qualifications
Mr. Roman’s bachelor’s and master’s
degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota
and the University of Southern California, his distinguished 3M
career over 30 years with leadership roles across multiple
geographies and businesses, his experience in managing 3M’s four
business groups and international operations, his knowledge and
skills in key areas such as manufacturing, supply chain,
technology, finance, and risk management, and his accomplishments
in sales growth, operational efficiency and value creation across a
wide range of global businesses, qualify him to serve as a director
of 3M.
|
24
3M Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate
governance at 3M |
|
 |
|
Recommendation of the
board
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote
“FOR” the election of these nominees as directors. Proxies
solicited by the Board of Directors will be voted “FOR”
these nominees unless a shareholder indicates otherwise in voting
the proxy.
|
|
|
|
|
2023 Proxy Statement
25
Table of Contents
Corporate
governance at 3M |
|
Board membership
criteria
3M’s
Corporate Governance Guidelines contain Board Membership Criteria
that include a list of key skills and characteristics deemed
critical to serve 3M’s long-term business strategy and expected to
be represented on 3M’s Board. The Nominating and Governance
Committee periodically reviews with the Board the appropriate
skills and characteristics required of Board members given the
current Board composition. It is the intent of the Board that the
Board, itself, will be a high-performance organization creating
competitive advantage for the Company. To perform as such, the
Board will be composed of individuals who have distinguished
records of leadership and success in their arena of activity and
who will make substantial contributions to Board operations and
effectively represent the interests of all shareholders. The
Committee’s and the Board’s assessment of Board candidates
includes, but is not limited to, consideration of:
● |
Roles in and contributions
valuable to the business community; |
|
|
● |
Personal
qualities of leadership, character, judgment, and whether the
candidate possesses and maintains throughout service on the Board a
reputation in the community at large of integrity, trust, respect,
competence, and adherence to the highest ethical
standards; |
|
|
● |
Relevant
knowledge and diversity of background and experience in business,
manufacturing, technology, finance and accounting, marketing,
international business, government, and other areas;
and |
|
|
● |
Whether
the candidate is free of conflicts and has the time required for
preparation, participation, and attendance at all
meetings. |
In addition to these
minimum requirements, the Committee will also evaluate whether the
nominee’s skills are complementary to the existing Board members’
skills, the Board’s needs for particular expertise in certain
areas, and will assess the nominee’s impact on Board dynamics,
effectiveness, and diversity of experience and
perspectives.
Director nominees —
diversity of skills and experience
The diagram
below summarizes the director nominees’ key skills and experiences
in the areas that are most relevant to 3M and shows the number of
director nominees who possess each of the skills and
experiences:
 |
|
Leadership.
Significant leadership experience with understanding of complex
global organizations, strategy, risk management, and how to drive
change and growth. |
|
 |
|
Finance. Financial
metrics measures our performance. All directors must understand
finance and financial reporting processes. All, but one, Audit
Committee members qualify as “audit committee financial
experts.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Manufacturing. As a
vertically integrated Company, manufacturing experience is
important to understanding the operations and capital needs of the
Company. |
|
 |
|
Global. Global
business experience is critical to 3M’s international growth with
60 percent of sales from outside the U.S. in 2022. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Supply
Chain. Directors with expertise in the management of the
upstream and downstream relationships with suppliers and customers
provide important perspectives on achieving efficient
operations. |
|
 |
|
Risk
Management. Directors with experience in risk management and
oversight, including environmental, social, and cybersecurity, play
an important role in the Board’s oversight of risks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Technology. As a
diversified technology, science-based Company, directors with
technology backgrounds understand 3M’s 51 technology platforms and
the importance of investing in new technologies for future
growth. |
|
 |
|
Marketing. Organic
growth is one of 3M’s financial metrics and directors with
marketing expertise provide important perspectives on developing
new markets. |
26 3M
Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate
governance at 3M |
Diversity
For 3M,
diversity, in its myriad manifestations, is fundamental to
innovation, performance, and relevancy. The Board of Directors
regards diversity as an important factor in selecting board
nominees to serve on the Board. When selecting nominees, it
actively considers diversity in recruitment and nomination of
directors, such as gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and
national origin. The current composition of our Board reflects
those ongoing efforts and the continued importance of diversity to
the Board.
Board
self-evaluation process
The Board
conducts a multi-step annual self-evaluation to determine whether
it, its committees and its directors are functioning effectively,
consider opportunities for continual enhancement, and as part of
its annual director nomination process.
1 |
|
Evaluations
by Board Leadership |
|
|
● Chairman/Lead
Director/Nominating and Governance (N&G) Committee Chair meet
in the fall to evaluate the performance and skills of each
director
● Information
is shared and discussed with the N&G Committee and considered
in the nomination process
|
2 |
|
One-on-One
Discussions with N&G Chair |
|
|
● N&G Chair
meets individually with each director to discuss:
● Effectiveness
of Board and committees
● Opportunities
for improvement
● Director’s
self-evaluation
● Director’s
evaluation of other Board members
● Other topics
selected by director
● N&G Chair
shares comments and feedback with the Board and N&G
Committee
|
3 |
|
Annual
Questionnaires |
|
|
● Each director
completes a questionnaire on the functioning of the Board and
committees
● Results are
discussed at subsequent Board and committee meetings
|
4 |
|
Feedback
Incorporated |
|
|
● As a result
of this process:
● The Board and
its committees identify potential areas for improvement, as well as
existing practices which have contributed to high
effectiveness
● Items
requiring follow-up are monitored on a going-forward basis by the
full Board, committees and/or committee chairs, as
applicable
● The N&G
Committee considers the performance and contributions of each
director as part of its annual nomination process to ensure our
directors continue to possess the necessary skills and experience
to effectively oversee the Company; on occasion, the N&G
Committee has not re-nominated a director
|
While this formal
self-evaluation is conducted on an annual basis, directors share
perspectives, feedback, and suggestions year-round. The Board and
each committee conducted an evaluation of its performance in
2022.
2023 Proxy
Statement 27
Table of Contents
Corporate
governance at 3M |
|
Director nomination
process
In addition
to its annual assessment and nomination of incumbent directors, the
Nominating and Governance Committee oversees the process for
selecting new director candidates.
Identification,
evaluation, and selection of nominees
Director nomination
process

The
Committee also focuses on overall Board-level succession planning
at the director level, periodically reviews the appropriate size
and composition of the Board and anticipates future vacancies and
needs of the Board. In the event the Committee recommends an
increase in the size of the Board or a vacancy occurs, the
Committee considers qualified nominees from several sources,
including current Board members and nominees recommended by
shareholders and other persons.
The
Committee may from time to time retain a director search firm to
help the Committee identify qualified director nominees for
consideration by the Committee. In 2022, the Committee retained
Russell Reynolds to help identify future Board
candidates.
28 3M
Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate
governance at 3M |
Shareholder
nominations
The
Nominating and Governance Committee has a policy to consider
properly submitted shareholder recommendations for candidates for
membership on the Board of Directors. Shareholders proposing
individuals for consideration by the Committee must include at
least the following information about the proposed nominee: the
proposed nominee’s name, age, business or residence address,
principal occupation or employment, and whether such person has
given written consent to being named in the Proxy Statement as a
nominee and to serving as a director if elected. Shareholders
should send the required information about the proposed nominee
to:
 |
|
Corporate
Secretary
3M Company
3M Center
Building 220-9E-02
St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 |
For an individual proposed
by a shareholder to be considered by the Committee for
recommendation as a Board nominee for the 2024 Annual Meeting, the
Corporate Secretary must receive the proposal by November 23, 2023.
Such proposals must be sent via registered, certified, or express
mail (or other means that allows the shareholder to determine when
the proposal was received by the Company). The Corporate Secretary
will refer properly submitted shareholder proposed nominations to
the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee for
consideration at a future Committee meeting. Individuals proposed
by shareholders in accordance with these procedures will receive
the same consideration received by individuals identified to the
Committee through other means.
Shareholder
nominations — advance notice bylaw
In
addition, 3M’s Bylaws permit shareholders to nominate directors at
an annual meeting of shareholders or at a special meeting at which
directors are to be elected in accordance with the notice of
meeting. Shareholders intending to nominate a person for election
as a director must comply with the requirements set forth in the
Company’s Bylaws. With respect to nominations to be acted upon at
our 2024 Annual Meeting, our Bylaws would require, among other
things, that the Corporate Secretary receive written notice from
the record shareholder no earlier than November 23, 2023, and no
later than December 23, 2023. The notice must contain the
information required by the Bylaws, a copy of which is available on
our website at www.3M.com, under Investor Relations —
Governance. Nominations received after December 23, 2023, will not
be acted upon at the 2024 Annual Meeting.
Shareholder
nominations — universal proxy rules
In addition
to satisfying the foregoing advance notice requirements under 3M’s
Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act),
shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director
nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that
sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the
Exchange Act no later than March 10, 2024, which is 60 days prior
to the anniversary date of the 2023 Annual Meeting. Shareholders
utilizing universal proxy are also required to follow other
requirements contained in 3M’s Bylaws, including the requirements
for shareholder nominations set forth in our advance notice bylaw
provision discussed above.
Proxy
access nominations
Further,
pursuant to the proxy access Bylaw adopted by the Board in November
2015, a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders,
continuously owning for three years at least three percent of our
outstanding common shares may nominate and include in our proxy
materials up to the greater of two directors and 20 percent of the
number of directors currently serving, if the shareholder(s) and
nominee(s) satisfy the Bylaw requirements. For eligible
shareholders to include in our proxy materials nominees for the
2023 Annual Meeting, proxy access nomination notices must be
received by the Company no earlier than November 23, 2023, and no
later than December 23, 2023. The notice must contain the
information required by the Bylaws.
Director orientation
and continuing education
Our
orientation programs familiarize new directors with 3M’s
businesses, strategic plans, and policies, and help prepare them
for their role on their assigned committees. Continuing education
programs assist directors in maintaining skills and knowledge
necessary for the performance of their duties. These programs may
be part of regular Board and Committee meetings or provided by
academic or other qualified third parties. The programs have also
included visits to the Company’s laboratories and manufacturing
facilities.
2023 Proxy
Statement 29
Table of Contents
Corporate
governance at 3M |
|
Director
independence
The Board
has adopted a formal set of Director Independence Guidelines with
respect to the determination of director independence, which either
conform to or are more exacting than the independence requirements
of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards, and the
full text of which is available on our website at
www.3M.com, under Investor Relations — Governance. In
accordance with these Guidelines, a director or nominee for
director must be determined to have no material relationship with
the Company other than as a director. The Guidelines specify the
criteria by which the independence of our directors will be
determined, including strict guidelines for directors and their
immediate family members with respect to past employment or
affiliation with the Company or its independent registered public
accounting firm. The Guidelines also prohibit Audit and
Compensation and Talent Committee members from having any direct or
indirect financial relationship with the Company and restrict both
commercial and not-for-profit relationships of all directors with
the Company. Directors may not be given personal loans or
extensions of credit by the Company, and all directors are required
to deal at arm’s length with the Company and its subsidiaries, and
to disclose any circumstance that might be perceived as a conflict
of interest.
In
accordance with these Guidelines, the Board undertook its annual
review of director independence. During this review, the Board
considered transactions and relationships between each director, or
any member of his or her immediate family and the Company and its
subsidiaries and affiliates in each of the most recent three
completed fiscal years. The Board also considered whether there
were any transactions or relationships between the Company and a
director or any members of a director’s immediate family (or any
entity of which a director or an immediate family member is an
executive officer, general partner, or significant equity holder).
The Board considered that in the ordinary course of business,
transactions may occur between the Company and its subsidiaries and
companies at which some of our directors are or have been officers.
In particular, the Board considered the annual amount of sales to
3M for each of the most recent three completed fiscal years by each
of the companies where directors serve or have served as an
executive officer, as well as purchases by those companies from 3M.
The Board determined that the amount of sales and purchases in each
fiscal year was below one percent of the annual revenues of each of
those companies, the threshold set forth in the Director
Independence Guidelines. The Board also considered charitable
contributions to not-for-profit organizations with which our
directors or immediate family members are affiliated, none of which
exceeded the threshold set forth in our Director Independence
Guidelines.
As a result
of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that the
following directors are independent under these Guidelines: Thomas
“Tony” K. Brown, Anne H. Chow, David B. Dillon, Michael L. Eskew,
James R. Fitterling, Amy E. Hood, Suzan Kereere, Gregory R. Page,
and Pedro J. Pizarro. The Board has also determined that members of
the Audit Committee and Compensation and Talent Committee received
no compensation from the Company other than for service as a
director. Michael F. Roman, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, is considered to not be independent because of
his employment by the Company.
Corporate governance
practices and policies
The Company
believes that good corporate governance practices serve the
long-term interests of shareholders, strengthen the Board and
management, and further enhance the public trust 3M has earned from
more than a century of operating with uncompromising integrity and
doing business the right way. The following sections provide an
overview of 3M’s corporate governance practices, which are
published on the Company’s website, including the Corporate
Governance Guidelines, our shareholder outreach and engagement
practices, the Codes of Conduct for directors and employees, public
policy engagement, and other important governance-related
policies.
30 3M
Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate
governance at 3M |
Corporate governance
highlights
 |
Board
compositions and independence |
|
|
 |
Board and
board committee practices |
● Diverse board
in all aspects
● Five
directors have joined our board within the past five years,
including two women directors and four directors with other diverse
traits
● 92 percent
independent board
● 100 percent
independent board committees
● 50 percent of
board committees chaired by a director with diverse
attributes
● Lead
Independent Director with robust authority
● Regular
executive sessions for independent directors
● Full access
to management and employees
|
|
|
● Annual board,
committee and individual director self-evaluation
process
● Comprehensive
onboarding and continuing education program
● Strong Audit
Committee financial expertise
● Regular board
refreshment with a balanced mix of tenure
● Mandatory
director retirement policy
● Active
consideration of diversity in director nomination
process
● Regular
shareholder outreach and engagement with director
participation
|
 |
Shareholder
rights |
|
|
 |
Board
oversight areas |
● Annual
election of all directors
● Majority
voting for director elections
● Market-standard
proxy access right
● No
supermajority voting requirements
● Shareholder
right to call special meetings
● No poison
pill
● Processes for
director nomination by shareholders and communicating with the
Board
|
|
|
● Long-term
strategic plans and capital allocation
● Enterprise
risk management, including cybersecurity
● Environmental
stewardship and sustainability
● Diversity and
inclusion, equity in workplaces, communities and business
practices
● Human capital
management
● CEO and
management succession planning
● Political
activities and contributions
|
 |
Executive
compensation governance |
● Compensation
opportunities aligned with market and predominantly
at-risk
● Incentive
programs incorporate performance metrics that are important to our
shareholders and drive long-term growth
● Comprehensive
clawback policy
● Robust stock
ownership guidelines for executive officers and
directors
● No hedging or
pledging by executive officers and directors
● No employment
or change in control agreements with any senior executives,
including CEO
● Annual
‘say-on-pay’ vote
|
2023 Proxy
Statement 31
Table of Contents
Corporate governance at 3M |
|
Corporate governance
guidelines
The Board
has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which provide a
framework for the effective governance of the Company. The
guidelines address matters such as the respective roles and
responsibilities of the Board and management, the Board’s
leadership structure, the responsibilities of the independent Lead
Director, director independence, the Board Membership Criteria,
Board committees, and Board and management evaluation. The Board’s
Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing
and reviewing the Guidelines at least annually and recommending any
proposed changes to the Board for approval. Some key governance
guidelines, not otherwise addressed in our Proxy Statement, are set
forth below. The Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Certificate
of Incorporation and Bylaws, the charters of the Board committees,
the Director Independence Guidelines, and the Codes of Conduct
provide the framework for the governance of the Company and are
available on our website at www.3M.com, under Investor
Relations — Governance.
|
Mandatory Retirement
Age |
|
|
● |
The retirement age of a nonemployee director is 74. A director
elected to the Board prior to their 74th birthday may
continue to serve until the annual shareholder meeting coincident
with or following their 74th birthday. Absent special
circumstances, directors will not be nominated for election after
their 74th birthday. |
|
|
Outside Board
Policy |
|
|
● |
Independent directors who also serve as CEOs of publicly-traded
companies or in equivalent positions should not serve on more than
two boards of public companies in addition to the 3M Board, and
other independent directors should not serve on more than four
other boards of public companies in addition to the 3M Board.
Independent directors must advise the Chairman/CEO before accepting
an invitation to serve on another for-profit board. |
|
|
Access to Employees and Outside
Advisors |
|
|
● |
Board members have complete access to all members of 3M management
and its employees, as well as outside advisors. |
|
|
Communication with
directors
The Board
of Directors has adopted the following process for shareholders and
other interested parties to send communications to members of the
Board. Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate
with the Lead Independent Director, the chairs of the Audit,
Compensation and Talent, Nominating and Governance, and Science,
Technology & Sustainability Committees of the Board, or
with any of our other independent directors, or all of them as a
group, by sending a letter to the following address: Corporate
Secretary, 3M Company, 3M Center, Building 220-9E-02, St. Paul, MN
55144-1000. The Corporate Secretary reviews communications to the
independent directors and forwards those communications to the
independent directors as discussed below. Communications involving
substantive accounting or auditing matters will be immediately
forwarded to the Chair of the Audit Committee and the Company’s
Chief Compliance Officer consistent with time frames established by
the Audit Committee for the receipt of communications dealing with
these matters. Communications that pertain to non-financial matters
will be forwarded promptly. Items that are unrelated to the duties
and responsibilities of the Board will not be forwarded, such as:
business solicitation or advertisements, product-related inquiries,
mass mailings, resumes or other job-related inquiries, and
unsolicited commercial e-mails.
3M’s
codes of conduct
More than a
century of operating with uncompromising integrity has earned 3M
trust from our customers, credibility with our communities, and
dedication from our employees. All of our employees, including our
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief
Accounting Officer, are required to abide by 3M’s Code of Conduct
to ensure that our business is conducted in a consistently legal
and ethical manner. The Code forms the foundation of a
comprehensive process that includes compliance with corporate
policies and procedures and a Company-wide focus on uncompromising
integrity in every aspect of our operations. Our Code of Conduct
covers many topics, including antitrust and competition law,
conflicts of interest, financial reporting, protection of
confidential information, and compliance with all laws and
regulations applicable to the conduct of our business.
32 3M
Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate governance at 3M |
Employees
are required to report any conduct that they believe in good faith
to be an actual or apparent violation of the Code of Conduct. The
Audit Committee has adopted procedures to receive, retain, and
treat complaints received regarding accounting, internal accounting
controls, or auditing matters, and to allow for the confidential
and anonymous submission by employees or others of concerns
regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. Information
on how to submit any such communications can be found on 3M’s
Investor Relations website, under Governance — Governance Documents
— Employee Business Conduct Policies — “Report a concern or ask a
question.” Our Chief Compliance Officer, who has direct reporting
obligations to the Audit Committee, periodically reports to the
Audit Committee on compliance with the Company’s Code of Conduct,
including the effectiveness of the Company’s compliance
program.
The Board
also has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for
Directors of the Company. This Code incorporates long-standing
principles of conduct the Company and the Board follow to ensure
the Company’s business and the activities of the Board are
conducted with integrity and adherence to the highest ethical
standards, and in compliance with the law. The Company’s Code of
Conduct for employees and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
for Directors are available on our website at www.3M.com
under Investor Relations — Governance — Governance
Documents.
Public
policy engagement
The Company
believes that transparency with respect to the consideration,
processes, and oversight of our engagement with lawmakers is
important to our shareholders, and continuously makes efforts to
give our shareholders useful information about our public policy
engagement. Since 2007, the Company has voluntarily published a
detailed explanation of the Company’s political activities which is
available on our website at www.3M.com under Investor
Relations — Governance — Governance Documents — “Lobbying and
Political Activities Governance.” There, the Company explains its
principles and governance procedures and provides detailed
information about 3M’s lobbying, political activities, and
engagement with industry associations. We discuss our positions on
important public policy issues, the factors we consider when
evaluating contribution proposals, and the processes we use for
legal, financial, executive, and Board oversight of our political
activities and contributions. We also provide links to the reports
the 3M Political Action Committee files monthly with the Federal
Election Commission and the Company’s quarterly Lobbying Disclosure
reports, as well as a detailed list of our contributions to state
candidates and political parties, and contributions to “527”
political organizations. The Company also discloses on its website
the trade associations the Company joined where $25,000 or more of
the dues are allocated for lobbying purposes by the trade
association. Certain tax-exempt organizations, organized under U.S.
Internal Revenue Code §501(c)(4) and known as “social welfare”
organizations, may engage in lobbying activities related to their
primary purpose. If the portion of any of our dues or other
contribution in excess of $25,000 are allocated to lobbying
activities, we will disclose the association and amount so
allocated. The Company believes that these disclosures on our
website, which exceed the disclosures required by law, offer
transparency respecting the Company’s public policy engagement and
political activities.
Related
person transaction policy and procedures
The Board
of Directors has adopted a written Related Person Transaction
Policy and Procedures that is administered by the Nominating and
Governance Committee. This Policy applies to any transaction or
series of transactions in which the Company or a subsidiary is a
participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a Related
Person (as that term is defined in the Policy) has a direct or
indirect material interest and which is required to be disclosed
under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. Transactions that fall within
this definition are referred to the Committee for approval or other
action. Based on its consideration of all of the relevant facts and
circumstances, the Committee decides whether or not to approve a
transaction and approves only those transactions that are in the
best interests of the Company and its shareholders. In the course
of its review and approval or ratification of a transaction, the
Committee considers:
● |
The nature of the Related Person’s interest
in the transaction; |
|
|
● |
The material terms of the transaction, including whether the
transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally
available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar
circumstances; |
|
|
● |
The significance of the transaction to the Related Person; |
|
|
● |
The significance of the transaction to the Company; |
|
|
● |
Whether the related person is involved in the negotiation of
the terms of the transaction or receives any special benefit as a
result of the transaction; |
|
|
● |
Whether the transaction would impair the judgment of a director
or executive officer to act in the best interest of the Company and
its shareholders; and |
|
|
● |
Any other matters the Committee deems appropriate. |
2023 Proxy
Statement 33
Table of Contents
Corporate governance at 3M |
|
Any
Committee member who is a Related Person with respect to a
transaction under review may not participate in the deliberations
or vote respecting such approval, except that such a director may
be counted in determining the presence of a quorum at a meeting at
which the Committee considers the transaction. There were no
Related Person Transactions that were referred to the Committee in
2022.
Policy
on adoption of a rights plan
In 2002 and
2003, a 3M shareholder submitted a shareholder proposal to 3M
regarding the approval process for adopting a shareholders’ rights
plan (also known as a “poison pill”). 3M does not have a rights
plan and is not currently considering adopting one. The Board
continues to believe, however, that there may be circumstances
under which adoption of a rights plan would give the Board the
negotiating power and leverage necessary to obtain the best result
for 3M shareholders in the context of a takeover effort.
Following
consideration of the favorable vote the shareholder proposal
received and in light of this belief, the Board adopted and has
reaffirmed a statement of policy on this topic. The Board’s policy
is that it will only adopt a rights plan if either: (1)
shareholders have approved adoption of the rights plan; or (2) the
Board (including a majority of the independent members of the
Board), in its exercise of its fiduciary responsibilities, makes a
determination that, under the circumstances existing at the time,
it is in the best interests of 3M’s shareholders to adopt a rights
plan without the delay in adoption resulting from seeking
shareholder approval.
The Board
has directed the Nominating and Governance Committee to review this
policy statement on an annual basis and to report to the Board on
any recommendations it may have concerning the policy. The terms of
the policy, as in effect, are included in 3M’s published Corporate
Governance Guidelines in addition to this Proxy
Statement.
Key areas of Board
oversight
Board’s
role in strategy
Each year
management presents to the Board, and the Board discusses and
approves, detailed long-term strategic plans for the Company. In
addition to the Company’s overall strategic plan, financial
strategic plan, and enterprise strategic plans and priorities,
including enterprise operations and sustainability matters, the
discussions also focused on breakout sessions with the directors on
strategic plans and priorities for each of the four business
groups. Information about these plans and priorities can be found
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Board’s
role in risk oversight
The Board
oversees the Company’s risk profile and management’s processes for
assessing and managing risk. The Board has delegated to the Audit
Committee the primary responsibility for oversight of policies and
procedures with respect to Company risk assessment and risk
management activities, the Company’s major risk exposures, and
management monitoring and mitigation activities. The Board has also
delegated oversight of specific risks to various
committees.
The Board
reviews enterprise risks at least annually. The full Board review
has included, among other things, portfolio management; major
litigation; fluorochemical stewardship; supply chain resiliency;
human capital management; sustainability; cybersecurity and
information security; geopolitical risks; and environmental,
health, and safety compliance. Other categories of risk and certain
sustainability elements have been assigned to designated Board
committees as summarized below. The chair of each committee that
oversees risk provides a summary of the matters discussed with the
committee to the full Board following each committee meeting, and
the minutes of each committee meeting are also provided to all
Board members.
The Board
believes that its practices related to oversight of risk, including
through delegation to its committees and the sharing of information
with the full Board, is appropriate for a diversified technology
and manufacturing company like 3M. The Board also believes its
oversight of risk is enhanced by its current leadership structure
(further discussed below) because the CEO, who is ultimately
responsible for the Company’s management of risk, also chairs
regular Board meetings. Given his in-depth knowledge and
understanding of the Company, the CEO is best able to bring key
business issues and risks to the Board’s attention. A summary of
risk oversight roles is included on the following page.
34 3M
Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate governance at 3M |
|
|
Board of
directors |
|
|
● |
Oversees the Company’s risk profile and management’s
processes for assessing and managing risk |
|
|
● |
Reviews enterprise risks at least
annually |
|
|
● |
Delegated to Audit Committee the primary
responsibility for oversight of risk assessment and risk management
activities |
|
|
● |
Assigned other important risks and certain
sustainability elements to designated Board committees as
identified below and receive reports from them |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Audit
● Financial statements / internal controls /
audit / independent accounting firm
● Contingent liabilities and long-term benefit
obligations
● Cybersecurity
● Capital allocation and structure
● Credit ratings and cost of capital
● Use of financial instruments to manage foreign
currency, commodity, and interest rate risks
● Ethics and compliance
|
|
Compensation and
Talent
● Executive compensation
● Annual review of Company’s risk assessment of its
compensation policies and practices for its employees, including
talent sourcing, diversity, and retention strategies
● Talent development and equal employment
opportunities
● Succession planning
|
|
|
|
Nominating and
Governance
● Corporate governance practices
● Director nominations and Board and committee
composition
● Corporate officer appointments and succession
planning
● Related person transactions
● Shareholder proposals and engagement
● Public policy, social responsibility, and political
activities
|
|
Science, Technology &
Sustainability
● Research and development
● Sustainability / environmental and product
stewardship / environmental, health and safety legal and regulatory
compliance
● Emerging science and technology, disruptive
innovations, materials vulnerability, and geopolitical issues
impacting the Company’s strategy, global business continuity, and
financial results
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Auditor |
|
● |
The Senior Vice
President and General Auditor, Corporate Auditing (Auditor) is
responsible for leading the risk assessment and management
process |
|
|
● |
The Auditor, through
consultation with the Company’s senior management, periodically
assesses the major risks facing the Company and works with the
executives who are responsible for managing specific risks |
|
|
● |
The Auditor, whose
appointment and performance is reviewed and evaluated by the Audit
Committee, periodically reviews with the Audit Committee the major
risks facing the Company and the steps management has taken to
monitor and mitigate those risks |
|
|
● |
The
Auditor’s risk management report, which is provided in advance of
the meeting, is reviewed with the entire Board by either the chair
of the Audit Committee or the Auditor |
|
|
Management |
|
|
● |
Provides
consultation to the Auditor during the assessment of the major
risks facing the Company |
|
|
● |
Manages and
mitigates risks |
|
|
● |
Reports, as needed,
to the full Board on how a particular risk is being managed and
mitigated |
|
|
2023 Proxy
Statement 35
Table of Contents
Corporate governance at 3M |
|
Board’s role in
management succession planning and human capital
management
The Board
plans the succession to the position of Chairman, CEO, and other
senior management positions. To assist the Board, the Chairman/CEO
and Chief Human Resources Officer annually assess senior managers
and their succession potential for the position of Chairman/CEO and
other senior management positions. The Board also reviews the
Company’s strategies and plans to recruit, retain, develop,
protect, and fairly compensate its global workforce, with focuses
on health and safety, development, diversity, equity and inclusion,
and compensation and benefits. Information about the Company’s
human capital can be found in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Board’s
role in sustainability
We are
guided by the principles of sound science and corporate
responsibility. We believe in an equitable and inclusive world, so
we think, work, and act to drive meaningful change that endures.
Together, we commit to creating a more sustainable world for future
generations.
In
collaboration with our employees, customers, partners, government,
and communities, we apply our expertise and technology to help
solve shared global challenges. We recognize and consistently seek
opportunities to do more. It is our ambition to meet the increasing
expectations of our customers, employees, investors, and
stakeholders — and grow our business — by continuing to make bold
sustainability commitments and taking stronger actions.
We use a
science-based approach to reimagine what’s possible as we rise to
the challenges that are most material to 3M and critical to our
planet and its people. Our goals and sustainability metrics reflect
a heightened commitment to thinking holistically about how our
people, products, and operations can all contribute to a better and
brighter future. Our goals and ambitions continue to grow and gain
momentum as we recognize how much still needs to be done to make
the world more sustainable for future generations. Our
sustainability strategy is a systemic approach, seeking to drive
innovation and holistic impact against shared global needs. We set
impactful and measurable goals that demonstrate our sustainability
commitments and progress. As a global science, technology, and
manufacturing company, we believe 3M is uniquely positioned to
bring our full capabilities to advance meaningful impact, not only
in our workplaces but also in our communities. As we advance our
initiatives with determination, we know systemic change requires
resources and long-term dedication.
We report
on these efforts annually in our Global Impact Report. As a global
corporation contributing to society through diverse markets, we
believe that we have significant opportunities and responsibilities
to advance the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals across
the world. We are also a participant of the United Nations Global
Compact, a policy initiative for businesses to demonstrate their
commitment to ten principles in the areas of human rights, labor,
environment, and anti-corruption. We align our Global Impact Report
to the guidelines of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board
(SASB) and the Task Force for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures
(TCFD) recommendations for helping businesses disclose
climate-related financial information. As we build on our global
capabilities and diverse technologies, we have clear commitments
and bold ambitions to shape a sustainable future within our
Strategic Sustainability Framework and its three priority areas:
Science for Circular, Science for Climate, and Science for
Community. Within these pillars, we build partnerships, implement
projects, and create processes that move us forward in the areas
where we can make the greatest impact.
36 3M
Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate governance at 3M |
In December
2022, 3M announced the exit of all PFAS manufacturing by end of
2025 and to work to discontinue use of PFAS across the product
portfolio by end of 2025, positioning 3M for continued sustainable
growth. With these two actions, 3M is committing to innovate toward
a world less dependent upon PFAS.
Our robust
governance framework includes oversight by our Board of Directors,
which receives regular sustainability updates and reviews related
risks as part of 3M’s enterprise risk management. The Science,
Technology & Sustainability Committee of the Board of
Directors has primary oversight responsibility of 3M’s
sustainability and stewardship activities, including, among others,
environmental and product stewardship efforts, environmental,
health & safety, and legal and regulatory compliance. The
company’s Environmental Responsibility and Sustainability
Committee, comprising 3M top executive management, provides
leadership, oversight and strategy for sustainability and develops
and monitors adherence with related policies and
procedures.
3M is a
pay-for-performance company. Beginning in 2022, a new ESG modifier
has been added to the formula used to calculate the annual
incentive compensation earned by the Company’s senior executives.
Amounts earned by them will be increased 10 percent of target,
decreased 10 percent of target, or left unchanged based on the
Compensation and Talent Committee’s assessment of 3M’s performance
against a set of objective ESG metrics. For more information, see
“Annual incentive — ESG Modifier” on page 72.
Board of Directors |
|
● Receives regular sustainability updates at Board
meetings
● Reviews sustainability-related risks as part of 3M’s
enterprise risk program
|
|
|
|
Science, Technology & Sustainability
Committee of the Board of Directors |
|
● Provides primary oversight of 3M’s
sustainability and stewardship activities
● Reviews 3M’s sustainability policies and program to
identify and analyze significant sustainability, materials
vulnerability and geopolitical issues that may impact 3M’s overall
business strategy, global business continuity and financial
results
|
|
|
|
Environmental Responsibility and
Sustainability Committee |
|
● Provides leadership, oversight, and strategy to
encourage and ensure sustainability opportunities are
recognized
● Develops and monitors adherence with strong
sustainability-related policies and procedures
● Includes 3M’s CEO, EVP &
CFO & Transformation Officer, CTO & EVP
Environmental Responsibility, Group President Enterprise
Operations, EVP & Chief HR Officer, EVP & Chief
Legal Affairs Officer, SVP & Chief Strategy Officer, and
EVP Country Governance & Services
|
|
|
|
Chief Sustainability Officer |
|
● Leads 3M’s sustainability activities
● Reports to the Environmental Responsibility and
Sustainability Committee and other internal and external groups
|
|
|
|
Sustainability leaders in business groups,
geographic areas, and enterprisewide |
|
● Drives Strategic Sustainability Framework
priorities and initiatives consistent with the scope of their
role
● Leads customer relationships to solve shared global
challenges
|
|
|
|
Through
engagement with our Board of Directors, executive leadership team
and business groups, our work across 3M’s Strategic Sustainability
Framework is advancing progress towards our sustainability
commitments and metrics.
To learn
more on our sustainability strategy, priority areas, and progress,
please visit www.3M.com/ESG.
2023 Proxy
Statement 37
Table of Contents
Corporate governance at 3M |
|
Our priority
areas

Science for
Circular
Design solutions that do more with
less material, advancing a global circular economy.
|
|
A
circular economy does more with less, keeps products and materials
in use, designs out waste and pollution, and regenerates natural
systems. At the core is an opportunity to develop technologies and
business models that are restorative and regenerative by design. At
3M, we see circular economy as an opportunity to inspire
leadership, innovation and disruptive change, all driving impact
for a more sustainable future.
Goals
● Reduce global water use by the following
amounts: 10 percent by 2022, 20 percent by 2025, and 25 percent by
2030, indexed to sales.(1),(2)
● For 3M’s global manufacturing operations,
enhance the quality of water returned to the environment from
industrial processes by 2030.(3),(4) Our initial focus
is on implementing state of-the-art water purification technology
at the largest water use locations globally and having them
operational in 2024.
● Engage 100 percent of water-stressed/scarce
communities where 3M manufactures, on community-wide approaches to
water management by 2025.
● Drive supply chain sustainability through
targeted raw material traceability and supplier performance
assurance by 2025.
● Reduce manufacturing waste by an additional 10
percent, indexed to sales by 2025.
● Achieve zero landfill status at more than 30
percent of manufacturing sites by 2025.
● Require a Sustainability Value Commitment (SVC)
for every new product.(5)
● Reduce dependence on virgin fossil-based plastic by
125 million pounds by 2025.(6)
|

Science for
Climate
Innovate to decarbonize industry,
accelerate global climate change solutions and improve our
environmental footprint.
|
|
At 3M,
we support the global consensus set forth in the 2015 Paris
Agreement and we are acting on the 2018 findings of the Special
Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change into our goals, operations and actions. The global
climate crisis impacts businesses, our communities and our
families. We believe that by working together, we can drive
necessary system change. We recognize the work to be done and are
inspired by the opportunity to chart our collective path
forward.
Goals
● Improve energy efficiency, indexed to net
sales, by 30 percent by 2025.
● Increase renewable energy to 50 percent of
total electricity use by 2025 and to 100 percent by 2050.
● Reduce Scope 1 and 2 market-based GHG emissions
at least 50 percent by 2030, 80 percent by 2040 and achieve
carbon neutrality in our operations by 2050.(2),(7)
● Help our customers reduce their GHGs by 250
million tons of CO2 equivalent emissions through the use of 3M
products by 2025.
|
38 3M
Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate governance at 3M |

Science for
Community
Create a more positive world through science and inspire people
to join us.
|
|
3M recognizes the crucial role of science in improving lives,
protecting health and safety, and helping solve global challenges.
We know we need new technologies, creative scientists, and
evidence-based policies and decisions to drive impactful change. We
recognize the importance of well-trained STEM graduates and the
critical need for equitable access to STEM education and careers
which drives us to advance diversity, equity, inclusion and social
justice within our company and community. We believe in the power
of science, sharing our expertise, and investing in the bright
minds of tomorrow. Together we will lead and design a sustainable
future for all.
Goals
● Invest cash and products for education,
community, and environmental programs by 2025.
● Double the pipeline of global diverse talent in
management to build a diverse workforce
by 2030.(8)
● Provide 300,000 work hours of skills-based
volunteerism by 3M employees to improve lives and help solve
society’s toughest challenges by 2025.(9)
● Provide training to five million people
globally on worker and patient safety by 2025.
● Invest $50 million to address racial
opportunity gaps in the U.S. through workforce development and STEM
education initiatives by 2025(6)
● Double the representation of underrepresented
groups from entry-level through management in our U.S.
workforce.(10),(11),(12)
● Double the representation of underrepresented
groups in management positions in our U.S.
workforce.(10),(11),(12)
● Advance economic equity by creating 5 million
unique STEM and skilled trades learning experiences for
underrepresented individuals by the end of 2025(13)
● Maintain or achieve 100 percent pay equity
globally(12)
|
(1) |
Expanded commitment
from 10 percent between 2015 and 2025. |
(2) |
2019 will be the baseline measure
year for these new commitments. |
(3) |
By improving the weighted average
of priority constituents, including select metals, biochemical
oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, cyanide compounds, fluoride,
total nitrogen, oil and grease, PFAS, total dissolved solids, total
suspended solids, sulfate, and others. |
(4) |
Water used by manufacturing or
industrial processes, including all water use not defined as
domestic (sanitary, cafeteria, etc.). |
(5) |
For projects passing a ‘gate’ in
our new product commercialization process; an SVC describes how the
product drives positive impact for our stakeholders in alignment
with our Strategic Sustainability Framework. |
(6) |
Established in 2021. |
(7) |
Expanded 3M’s 2025 goal to stay
below 50 percent of our 2002 baseline, meaning 3M’s 2030 Scope 1
and 2 emissions will now be reduced more than 85 percent from 2002
levels. |
(8) |
In 2021, 3M updated the goal
maturity date to 2030 from 2025. |
(9) |
Goal was initiated in 2019.
Skills-based volunteering is primarily delivered through the 3M
Impact program. |
(10) |
Underrepresented groups in our 3M
U.S. workforce include Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino
employees. |
(11) |
2020 is the baseline measurement
year. |
(12) |
Established in 2020 to drive trend
and trajectory progress over time. |
(13) |
2021 is the baseline measurement
year. 3M defines underrepresented individuals in the U.S. using
National Science Foundation research. For global definitions, we
rely on gender diversity and local context for marginalized
populations. |
2023
Proxy Statement 39
Table of Contents
Corporate
governance at 3M |
|
Board structure and
processes
Board’s leadership
structure
Our Corporate Governance
Guidelines allow the independent directors flexibility to split or
combine the Chairman and CEO responsibilities. The independent
directors annually review our leadership structure to determine the
structure that is in the best interest of 3M and its
shareholders.
The Board’s
current leadership structure is characterized by:
● |
A combined Chairman of the
Board and CEO; |
● |
A strong, independent, and
highly experienced Lead Independent Director with well-defined
responsibilities that support the Board’s oversight
responsibilities; |
● |
A robust committee
structure consisting entirely of independent directors with
oversight of various types of risks; and |
● |
An engaged
and independent Board. |
The Board
believes that this leadership structure provides independent board
leadership and engagement while deriving the benefits of having our
CEO also serve as Chairman of the Board. As the individual with
primary responsibility for managing the Company’s day-to-day
operations and with in-depth knowledge and understanding of the
Company, the CEO is best positioned to chair regular Board meetings
as the directors discuss key business and strategic issues. Coupled
with the Lead Independent Director, this combined structure
provides independent oversight while avoiding unnecessary confusion
regarding the Board’s oversight responsibilities and the day-to-day
management of business operations.
The Board
believes that adopting a rigid policy on whether to separate or
combine the positions of Chairman of the Board and CEO would
inhibit the Board’s ability to provide for a leadership structure
that would best serve shareholders. As a result, the Board has
rejected adopting a policy permanently separating or combining the
positions of Chairman and CEO in its Corporate Governance
Guidelines, which are reviewed at least annually and available on
our website at www.3M.com, under Investor Relations —
Governance. Instead, the Board adopted an approach that allows it,
in representing the shareholders’ best interests, to decide who
should serve as Chairman or CEO, or both.
The Board
believes that combining the roles of CEO and Chairman contributes
to an efficient and effective Board. The Board believes that to
drive change and continuous improvement within the Company,
tempered by respect for 3M’s traditions and values, the CEO must
have maximum authority. The CEO is primarily responsible for
effectively leading significant change, improving operational
efficiency, driving growth, managing the Company’s day-to-day
business, managing the various risks facing the Company, and
reinforcing the expectation for all employees of continuing to
build on 3M’s century-old tradition of uncompromising integrity and
doing business the right way.
The Board
also believes that the Company’s corporate governance measures
ensure that strong, independent directors continue to effectively
oversee the Company’s management and key issues related to
executive compensation, CEO evaluation and succession planning,
strategy, risk, and integrity. The Corporate Governance Guidelines
provide, in part, that:
● |
Independent directors
comprise a substantial majority of the Board; |
● |
Directors are elected
annually by a majority vote in uncontested director
elections; |
● |
Only independent directors
serve on the Audit, Compensation and Talent, Nominating and
Governance, and Science, Technology & Sustainability
Committees; |
● |
The committee chairs
establish their respective agendas; |
● |
The Board and committees
may retain their own advisors; |
● |
Independent directors have
complete access to management and employees; |
● |
Independent directors meet
in executive session without the CEO or other employees during each
regular Board meeting; and |
● |
The Board
and each committee regularly conduct a self-evaluation to determine
whether it and its committees function effectively. |
The Board has also
designated one of its members to serve as Lead Independent
Director, with responsibilities that are similar to those typically
performed by an independent chairman.
40 3M
Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate
governance at 3M |
Lead
Independent Director
Since 2012,
our Lead Independent Director has been Michael Eskew, a highly
experienced director. He recently served on the boards of The
Allstate Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company, and International
Business Machines Corporation, and is the former Chairman and CEO
of United Parcel Service, Inc. His responsibilities include, but
are not limited to, the following:
● |
Presides at all meetings
of the Board at which the Chairman is conflicted or not present,
including executive sessions of the independent
directors; |
● |
Acts as a key liaison
between the Chairman/CEO and the independent directors; |
● |
Approves the meeting
agendas for the Board, and approves the meeting schedules to assure
that there is sufficient time for preparation and discussion of all
agenda items; |
● |
Has the authority to
approve the materials to be delivered to the directors in advance
of each Board meeting and provides feedback regarding the quality,
quantity, and timeliness of those materials (this duty not only
gives the Lead Director approval authority with respect to
materials to be delivered to the directors in advance of each Board
meeting but also provides a feedback mechanism so that the
materials may be improved for future meetings); |
● |
Has the authority to call
meetings of the independent directors; |
● |
Communicates Board member
feedback to the Chairman/CEO (except that the chair of the
Compensation and Talent Committee leads the discussion of the
Chairman/CEO’s performance and communicates the Board’s evaluation
of that performance to the Chairman/CEO); |
● |
If requested by major
shareholders, ensures that he is available, when appropriate, for
consultation and direct communication; and |
● |
Performs
such other duties as requested by the independent
directors. |
Executive
sessions
As an
agenda item for every regularly scheduled Board and committee
meeting, independent directors regularly meet in executive session,
without the Chairman/CEO or other members of management present, to
consider such matters as they deem appropriate. The Lead
Independent Director presides over the Board’s executive
sessions.
2023 Proxy
Statement 41
Table of Contents
Corporate
governance at 3M |
|
Board
committees
Board and committee
information
The Board
currently has the following standing committees: Audit;
Compensation and Talent; Nominating and Governance; and Science,
Technology & Sustainability. The current members of our
committees, the principal functions of each committee, and the
number of meetings held in 2022 are shown below. Each member is
independent under our Director Independence Standards, as well as
applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules and NYSE
listing standards.
Each
committee has adopted, and annually reviews, a charter setting
forth its roles and responsibilities. Those charters are available
at www.3M.com > Investor Relations > Governance >
Governance Documents > Committee Charters.
Board
committee composition
Name of
Non-employee Director |
|
Audit |
|
Compensation
and Talent |
|
Nominating
and
Governance |
|
Science,
Technology
& Sustainability |
Thomas
“Tony” K. Brown |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Anne H.
Chow |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
Pamela J.
Craig |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
David B.
Dillon |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Michael L.
Eskew |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
James R.
Fitterling |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Amy E.
Hood |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
Muhtar
Kent |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Suzan
Kereere |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Dambisa F.
Moyo |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Gregory R.
Page |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
Pedro J.
Pizarro |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committee
member
Chair
42 3M
Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate
governance at 3M |
Audit
Committee Meetings
in 2022: 10 |
|
|
|
David B. Dillon
(chair) |
Thomas “Tony” K.
Brown
 |
Pamela J.
Craig*
 |
Michael L.
Eskew
 |
Dambisa F.
Moyo*
 |
Pedro J.
Pizarro**
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The
Board of Directors has determined that all Audit Committee members
are “independent” and “financially literate” under the NYSE listing
standards and that members of the Audit Committee received no
compensation from the Company other than for service as a
director.
The
Board has also determined that the following Audit Committee
members — David B. Dillon (chair), Pamela J. Craig, Michael L.
Eskew, Dambisa F. Moyo, and Pedro J. Pizarro — have “accounting or
related financial management expertise” under the NYSE listing
standards and are “audit committee financial experts” as that term
is defined by applicable Securities and Exchange Commission
regulations.
Introduction
The Audit
Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the integrity of
the Company’s financial statements; compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements; the qualifications, independence, and
performance of the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm (Independent Accounting Firm); the performance of
the Company’s internal auditing department; and the Company’s
financial risk assessment and management; and furnishes a report
for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement.
Roles
and Responsibilities
● Reviews the Company’s annual audited and quarterly
consolidated financial statements and internal controls over
financial reporting;
● Reviews the Company’s financial reporting process
and internal controls over financial reporting, including any major
issues regarding accounting principles and financial statement
presentation, and critical accounting policies to be used in the
consolidated financial statements;
● Reviews and discusses with management and the
Independent Accounting Firm the Company’s report on internal
controls over financial reporting and the Independent Accounting
Firm’s audit of internal controls over financial reporting;
● Reviews earnings press releases prior to
issuance;
● Appoints, oversees, and approves compensation of the
Independent Accounting Firm;
● Reviews with the Independent Accounting Firm the
scope of the annual audit, including fees and staffing, and
approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by
the Independent Accounting Firm;
● Reviews findings and recommendations of the
Independent Accounting Firm and management’s response to the
recommendations of the Independent Accounting Firm;
● Discusses policies with respect to risk assessment
and risk management, the Company’s major risk exposures, and the
steps management has taken to monitor and mitigate such
exposures;
● Periodically reviews the Company’s capital
allocation and capital structure strategies, insurance coverage,
funding for pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, and
global tax planning;
● Periodically reviews the Company’s global Treasury
activities, including risks associated with cash investments,
counterparties, and use of derivatives and other financial
instruments for risk management purposes;
|
|
● Periodically reviews and approves the Company’s use
of swaps exemption pursuant to Dodd-Frank derivatives clearing
policy;
● Quarterly obtains reports from senior management,
including the Chief Information Officer, regarding the progress on
the phased implementation of the global enterprise resource
planning system, information technology networks and systems, and
the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s information
security policies and internal controls regarding information
security;
● Periodically obtains reports from the Company’s
senior internal auditing executive, who has direct reporting
obligations to the Committee, on the annual audit plan, scope of
work, and the results of internal audits and management’s response
thereto;
● Periodically obtains reports from the Company’s
Chief Compliance Officer, who has direct reporting obligations to
the Committee, on compliance with the Company’s Code of Conduct,
and at least annually, on the implementation and effectiveness of
the Company’s compliance and ethics program;
● Reviews with the Company’s General Counsel legal
matters that may have a material impact on the consolidated
financial statements and any material reports or inquiries received
from regulators or government agencies regarding compliance;
and
● Establishes procedures for (i) the receipt,
retention, and treatment of complaints received by the Company
regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing
matters; and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by Company
employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing
matters and periodically review with the Chief Compliance Officer
and the Company’s senior internal auditing executive these
procedures and any significant complaints received.
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Until Ms. Craig’s and Ms.
Moyo’s retirement in May 2023. |
Financially
literate |
Financial
expert |
** |
Effective
February 9, 2023. |
|
|
2023 Proxy
Statement 43
Table of Contents
Corporate
governance at 3M |
|
Compensation and
Talent Committee
Meetings in 2022:
5 |
|
Pamela J.
Craig*
(chair) |
James R.
Fitterling* |
Anne H.
Chow** |
Michael L.
Eskew |
Amy E.
Hood |
Suzan
Kereere |
Gregory R.
Page |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The
Board of Directors has determined that all Compensation and Talent
Committee members are “independent” under the NYSE listing
standards, including the listing standards applicable to
compensation committee members.
The
Board has also determined that each Compensation and Talent
Committee member qualifies as a “Non-Employee Director” under Rule
16b-3 of the Exchange Act.
Introduction
The
Compensation and Talent Committee reviews the Company’s
compensation practices and policies, annually reviews and approves
(subject to ratification by the independent directors of the Board)
the compensation for the CEO, annually reviews and approves the
compensation for the other senior executives, evaluates CEO
performance, reviews and discusses with management of the Company
the Compensation Discussion and Analysis prepared in accordance
with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s disclosure rules for
executive compensation, and furnishes a report for inclusion in the
Company’s Proxy Statement.
Roles
and Responsibilities
● Reviews disclosures in the Company’s Proxy Statement
regarding advisory votes on executive compensation and the
frequency of such votes;
● Approves the adoption, amendment, and termination of
incentive compensation and deferred compensation programs for
employees of the Company;
● Approves the adoption, amendment, or termination of
equity compensation programs or, if shareholder approval would be
required, recommends such actions to the Board;
● Approves, subject to ratification by the independent
directors of the Board, employment agreements and severance
arrangements for the CEO, as appropriate;
● Approves employment agreements and severance
arrangements for the senior executives of the Company (other than
the CEO), as appropriate;
● Oversees the administration of the Company’s stock
and long-term incentive compensation programs, and determines the
employees who receive awards and the size of their awards under
such programs;
● Approves the adoption and amendment of Company
guidelines covering ownership of Company common stock by
executives, and annually reviews compliance with these
guidelines;
|
|
● Reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of
Directors concerning any amendment to a retirement benefit plan
that would require Board approval;
● Annually reviews a risk assessment of the Company’s
compensation policies and practices for its employees;
● Periodically reviews and discusses with the
Company’s management matters relating to internal pay equity;
● Reviews shareholder proposals relating to executive
compensation matters and makes recommendations to the Board
regarding responses;
● Periodically reviews and discusses with management
matters relating to talent sourcing, diversity, and retention
strategies; talent development; internal pay equity; and equal
employment opportunities;
● Periodically reviews with the Chairman/CEO their
assessment of the Company’s senior executives and succession plans
relating to their positions; and
● Has the authority to retain compensation
consultants, counsel, or other advisors as it deems appropriate,
including the authority to approve such advisors’ fees and
retention terms.
|
The Committee may delegate
its authority to subcommittees of one or more Committee members or
to senior executives of the Company as it deems appropriate,
subject to compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations, and
plan requirements. The Committee has delegated authority to the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and to its Executive Vice
President and Chief Human Resources Officer, to grant certain
stock-based awards to eligible, non-executive employees, subject to
certain limits.
* |
Ms. Craig will
continue to serve on the committee until her retirement in May
2023. Mr. Fitterling is expected to become committee chair in
connection with Ms. Craig’s retirement. |
** |
Effective
February 9, 2023. |
44 3M
Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate
governance at 3M |
Nominating
and Governance
Committee Meetings
in 2022: 6 |
Muhtar Kent*
(chair) |
Thomas
“Tony” K. Brown* |
David B.
Dillon |
Dambisa F.
Moyo** |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The
Board of Directors has determined that all Nominating and
Governance Committee members are “independent” under the NYSE
listing standards.
Introduction
The
Nominating and Governance Committee establishes the Board
Membership Criteria, assists the Board by identifying individuals
qualified to become Board members, recommends to the Board matters
of corporate governance, facilitates the annual review of the
performance of the Board and its committees, and periodically
reviews CEO and management succession plans.
Roles
and Responsibilities
● Selects and recommends director candidates to the
Board of Directors, in light of the Board Membership Criteria
adopted by the Board, either to be submitted for election at the
Annual Meeting or to fill any vacancies on the Board, including
consideration of any shareholder nominees for director (submitted
in accordance with the Company’s Bylaws);
● Reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of
Directors concerning the composition and size of the Board and its
committees, the Board Membership Criteria, frequency of meetings,
and changes in compensation for non-employee directors;
● Reviews the Company’s Corporate Governance
Guidelines at least annually, and recommends any proposed changes
to the Board for approval;
● Develops and recommends to the Board standards to be
applied in making determinations on the types of relationships that
constitute material relationships between the Company and a
director for purposes of determining director independence;
|
|
● Reviews and approves any transaction between the
Company and any related person, which is required to be disclosed
under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission;
● Develops and recommends to the Board for its
approval an annual self-assessment process of the Board and its
committees and oversees the process;
● Reviews periodically with the Chairman/CEO
succession plans relating to positions held by elected corporate
officers, and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to
the selection of individuals to occupy these positions;
● Periodically reviews the corporate contribution
program (3Mgives) and the contribution activities of the 3M
Foundation, which is funded by the Company; and
● Periodically reviews the Company’s positions and
engagement on important public policy, social responsibility, and
corporate governance issues affecting its business, including
political contributions by 3M and its Political Action Committee,
and shareholder engagement.
|
* |
Mr. Kent will
continue to serve on the committee until his retirement in May
2023. Mr. Brown is expected to become committee chair in connection
with Mr. Kent’s retirement. |
** |
Until Ms.
Moyo’s retirement in May 2023. |
2023 Proxy
Statement 45
Table of Contents
Corporate
governance at 3M |
|
Science,
Technology & Sustainability
Committee Meetings
in 2022: 8 |
Gregory R. Page
(chair) |
Anne H.
Chow* |
Amy E.
Hood |
Muhtar
Kent** |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The
Board of Directors has determined that all Science,
Technology & Sustainability Committee members are
“independent” under the NYSE listing standards.
Introduction
The
responsibility of the Science, Technology & Sustainability
Committee of the 3M Board of Directors is to oversee the twin
demands of developing products to meet the ever-changing needs of
our customers while ensuring that those products cause no harm to
people or to our planet. The Science, Technology &
Sustainability Committee is responsible for providing the general
oversight of the significant scientific and technological aspects
of 3M’s businesses and the Company’s sustainability and stewardship
activities.
Roles
and Responsibilities
● Monitors and reviews the overall strategy,
direction, and effectiveness of the Company’s research and
development activities;
● Reviews management’s strategy and allocation of
resources for research and development activities, including
product line extensions and new product platforms;
● Reviews the Company’s policies and programs on
sustainability; environmental and product stewardship; and
environmental, health, and safety, including for compliance with
all applicable laws and regulations;
|
|
● Assists the Board in identifying and analyzing
significant emerging science and technology, disruptive
innovations, sustainability, materials vulnerability, and
geopolitical issues that may impact the Company’s overall business
strategy, global business continuity, and financial results;
and
● Annually reviews the Company’s sustainability
report.
|
* |
Effective
February 9, 2023. |
** |
Until Mr.
Kent’s retirement in May 2023. |
Meeting
attendance
During
2022, the Board of Directors held five regularly scheduled meetings
and six special meetings. Overall attendance at Board and committee
meetings was 93 percent. During 2022, all of our director nominees
who were directors during 2022 attended at least 75 percent of all
Board and committee meetings on which they served.
The Company
has a long-standing policy that directors are expected to attend
the Annual Meeting of Shareholders unless extenuating circumstances
prevent them from attending. All directors who were members of the
Board as of May 2022 attended last year’s Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
46 3M
Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate governance at 3M |
Director
compensation
Philosophy and
Process
The
Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing
and making recommendations to the Board regarding all changes to
the compensation of our non-employee directors. The Board reviews
the recommendations of the Nominating and Governance Committee and
determines the form and amount of director compensation.
In
developing its recommendations, the Nominating and Governance
Committee is guided by the following goals:
● |
Compensation should fairly
pay directors for work required in a company of 3M’s size and
complexity; |
|
|
● |
A
significant portion of the total compensation should be paid in
common stock (or common stock equivalents) to align directors’
interests with the long-term interests of shareholders;
and |
|
|
● |
The
structure of the compensation should be simple and
transparent. |
The Nominating and
Governance Committee works with an independent compensation
consultant to support its objectives of maintaining a reasonable
and appropriate program. For 2022, Frederic W. Cook & Co.,
Inc. (FW Cook) provided the Nominating and Governance Committee
with expert advice on the compensation of non-employee directors,
in addition to analyzing market data on director compensation at
the same peer group of companies approved by the Compensation and
Talent Committee for evaluating Named Executive Officer
compensation. Neither the Company nor the Nominating and Governance
Committee has any arrangement with any other compensation
consultant who has a role in determining or recommending the amount
or form of director compensation. For more information on the peer
group, see “Executive compensation peer group” on page
69.
Directors
who are employees of the Company do not receive payment for their
Board service.
Elements of annual
compensation for non-employee directors
Our
non-employee directors receive annual compensation, as summarized
below, that is intended to approximate the peer-group median mix
(cash vs. equity) and provide an overall target total direct
compensation that is consistent with 3M’s size and
market-capitalization value relative to its peers. To better align
the interests of our directors with those of our shareholders, the
annual stock retainer is subject to a rigorous hold-until-departure
requirement. For more information on the peer group, please see the
section entitled “Executive compensation peer group” on page 69 of
this Proxy Statement. |
|
In May
2022, the Nominating and Governance Committee considered a director
compensation study prepared by FW Cook and recommended not to
change the non-employee directors’ compensation arrangements, which
the Board accepted. |

|
Abbreviations: AC = Audit Committee; STSC =
Science, Technology & Sustainability Committee |
|
|
* |
Unless a director elects otherwise (see “Alternative Times and
Forms of Payment” below), the annual cash retainer, annual Lead
Director fee and annual Committee Chair fee are paid in cash on a
quarterly basis, and the annual stock retainer is paid shortly
after the Annual Meeting in deferred stock units (DSUs). All such
cash fees are prorated based on the number of days of relevant
service during the calendar quarter in which the fees are earned,
and directors joining the Board after the Annual Meeting receive a
prorated annual stock retainer. |
2023 Proxy
Statement 47
Table of Contents
Corporate governance at 3M |
|
DSUs. Each DSU
represents the right to receive one share of 3M common stock at a
future date. For fees paid in DSUs, the number of units credited to
the director’s recordkeeping account is determined by dividing the
value of the fees to be paid by the closing price for a share of 3M
common stock on the NYSE for the last trading day immediately
preceding the earliest date such amount otherwise could have been
paid to the director if taken on a current basis. The Company also
credits the director’s account with an additional number of DSUs
for each ordinary cash dividend paid on the shares of the Company’s
common stock. Appropriate adjustments to the DSUs credited to each
director’s account will be made for stock splits, stock dividends,
spinoffs, mergers, consolidations, payments of dividends other than
in cash, and similar circumstances affecting 3M common stock.
Unless a different time or form of payment is elected (see
“Alternative Times and Forms of Payment” below), the shares of 3M
common stock underlying the DSUs will be distributed in a single
lump sum during the month of January in the first year after the
director leaves the Board.
Alternative Times and
Forms of Payment. In lieu of receiving all or a portion of the
annual stock retainer in DSUs, a director may elect to receive
shares of 3M common stock on a current basis, but the net after-tax
portion of such shares must be retained by the director until he or
she leaves the Board. Similarly, in lieu of cash fees, a director
may opt to receive 3M common shares, DSUs, or deferred cash.
Directors also may elect to receive distribution of their deferred
cash or settlement of their DSUs as follows:
● |
a single lump sum during the month of
January in the first or second year following the year in which
they leave the Board; or |
|
|
● |
in a series of three, five, or ten annual installments
beginning during the month of January in the first year after they
leave the Board. |
2022 director
compensation table
The table
below shows the amounts earned by our non-employee directors in
2022. As Ms. Chow and Mr. Pizarro joined the Board on February 9,
2023, they did not earn any director compensation during
2022.
Non-employee
Director |
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)(3) |
|
Stock
Awards
($)(4) |
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)(5) |
|
|
Total
($) |
Thomas “Tony” K. Brown |
|
135,000 |
|
185,000 |
|
578 |
|
|
320,578 |
Pamela J. Craig(1) |
|
152,778 |
|
185,000 |
|
5,622 |
|
|
343,400 |
David B. Dillon(1) |
|
160,000 |
|
185,000 |
|
1,082 |
|
|
346,082 |
Michael L. Eskew(1) |
|
175,000 |
|
185,000 |
|
6,351 |
|
|
366,352 |
James R. Fitterling |
|
135,000 |
|
185,000 |
|
277 |
|
|
320,278 |
Herbert L. Henkel(2) |
|
48,215 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
48,215 |
Amy E. Hood |
|
135,000 |
|
185,000 |
|
1,096 |
|
|
321,096 |
Muhtar Kent(1) |
|
155,000 |
|
185,000 |
|
1,098 |
|
|
341,098 |
Suzan Kereere(2) |
|
130,000 |
|
231,123 |
|
756 |
|
|
361,880 |
Dambisa F. Moyo |
|
135,000 |
|
185,000 |
|
1,021 |
|
|
321,021 |
Gregory R. Page(1) |
|
160,000 |
|
185,000 |
|
1,027 |
|
|
346,027 |
Patricia A. Woertz(1),(2) |
|
50,437 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
50,437 |
FOOTNOTES TO 2022 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE |
|
|
(1) |
Lead Director or Committee Chair during all
or a portion of 2022. |
|
|
(2) |
Director compensation prorated according to effective date of
election, appointment, or retirement: Ms. Kereere was appointed to
the Board, effective February 10, 2022; Ms. Craig succeeded Ms.
Woertz as Chair of the Compensation and Talent Committee, effective
February 10, 2022; and each of Mr. Henkel and Ms. Woertz retired
from the Board, effective May 10, 2022. |
|
|
(3) |
This column represents the amount of all fees earned or paid in
cash for services as a director, including the annual cash retainer
and the annual lead director and committee chair fees. With respect
to Suzan Kereere, the amount shown also includes $10,000 for her
services on a special committee. The table below shows the amount
of cash compensation earned during 2022 that each director elected
to receive in 3M common shares or DSUs and the number of shares or
DSUs received, excluding adjustments for dividend equivalents. For
more information concerning all 3M stock-based holdings of the
directors, see “Security ownership of management” beginning on page
108. |
48 3M
Company
Table of Contents
|
Corporate governance at 3M |
|
|
|
Cash Fees
Paid in Common Shares
or DSUs at Director’s Election |
|
3M Common Shares
or DSUs Received |
|
Non-Employee Directors |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
Thomas “Tony” K. Brown |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Pamela J. Craig |
|
— |
|
— |
|
David B. Dillon |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Michael L. Eskew |
|
175,000 |
|
1,351 |
|
James R. Fitterling |
|
135,000 |
|
1,042 |
|
Herbert L. Henkel |
|
48,215 |
|
332 |
|
Amy E. Hood |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Muhtar Kent |
|
155,000 |
|
1,216 |
|
Suzan Kereere |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Dambisa F. Moyo |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Gregory R. Page |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Patricia A. Woertz |
|
50,437 |
|
348 |
(4) |
This column represents the grant date fair
value of the stock awards made in 2022, computed in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation. In
addition to the amount shown for the annual stock retainer each
director received shortly following his or her election to the
Board at the 2022 Annual Meeting, the amount shown for Ms. Kereere
includes $46,123 attributable to the prorated annual stock retainer
she received for her service to the Board from the date of her
appointment through the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting. |
|
|
|
The Company does not grant stock options to non-employee
directors. Since all stock awards vest on the grant date, there are
no unvested stock awards outstanding at year end. |
|
|
(5) |
This column includes the incremental cost of complimentary
products and matching gifts. Non-employee directors are eligible to
participate in the Company’s matching gift program on the same
terms as 3M employees. Under this program, the 3M Foundation will
match up to $5,000 a year in contributions made by the director to
eligible educational institutions and up to $1,000 a year in
contributions by the director to eligible charitable
organizations. |
Reasonableness of
non-employee director compensation
As
described above, our philosophy on director compensation is to pay
directors fairly for work required in a company of our size and
complexity, provide a significant portion of the total compensation
in the form of equity-based compensation to align directors’
interests with the long-term interests of our shareholders, and
structure compensation in a simple and transparent manner. We
believe that the application of this philosophy has resulted in a
non-employee director compensation program that reflects
best-in-class design with the following provisions:
● |
Retainer-only compensation delivered in a
combination of cash and stock-based awards with no fees for
attending meetings that are an expected part of board service. |
|
|
● |
Additional retainers for special roles having greater
responsibilities, such as Lead Director and committee chairs, to
recognize the incremental additional time and effort required. |
|
|
● |
Equity delivered in the form of current or deferred full-value
shares, where annual grants are based on a competitive fixed-value
formula and immediate vesting helps avoid director
entrenchment. |
|
|
● |
A requirement that directors hold until the end of their Board
service all annual stock retainers earned on or after October 1,
2007, which includes net after-tax shares attributable to current
payments and pre-tax shares attributable to deferrals. |
|
|
● |
Flexible voluntary deferral provisions. |
|
|
● |
No material benefits or perquisites. |
|
|
● |
Our 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan, most recently approved by
shareholders at the 2021 Annual Meeting, includes a $600,000 annual
compensation limit on all forms of compensation for non-employee
directors. |
2023 Proxy
Statement 49
Table of Contents
Corporate governance at 3M |
|
Stock retention
requirement
The Board requires each
director to hold the net after-tax shares (or, if deferred, a
number of DSUs equal to the number of pre-tax shares underlying the
DSUs) attributable to all annual stock retainers earned on or after
October 1, 2007, until the director leaves the Board. Information
regarding accumulated stock and DSUs is set forth under “Security
ownership of management” beginning on page 108. |
|
Shares or
DSUs issued to 3M’s directors as part of their annual stock
retainer are subject to rigorous hold-until-departure
requirements. |
Prohibition of
hedging, pledging, and other actions
The Company’s stock
trading policies prohibit the Company’s directors and executive
officers from (1) purchasing any financial instrument that is
designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of the
Company’s common stock, including prepaid variable forward
contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds; (2) engaging
in short sales related to the Company’s common stock; (3) placing
standing orders; (4) maintaining margin accounts; and (5) pledging
3M securities as collateral for a loan. All discretionary
transactions in 3M securities by directors and executive officers
must be pre-cleared with the Company’s Legal Affairs department and
conducted during approved trading windows. |
|
● No
hedging
● No
short sales
● No
standing orders
● No
margin accounts
● No
pledging
|
50 3M
Company
Table of Contents
Proposal
2 |
|
Ratification of the Appointment of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for
2023 |

“FOR”
|
|
● Ratify the appointment of PwC as 3M’s
independent registered public accounting firm for 2023.
● Based on its assessment of the qualifications
and performance of PwC, the Audit Committee believes that it is in
the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to retain
PwC.
Recommendation of the
Audit Committee
The Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote
“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PwC as the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2023.
Proxies solicited by the Board of Directors will be voted
“FOR” ratification unless a shareholder indicates otherwise
in voting the proxy.
|
The Audit Committee is
directly responsible for the appointment, compensation (including
approval of all fees), retention, and oversight of the Company’s
Independent Accounting Firm retained to perform the audit of our
financial statements and our internal control over financial
reporting.
The Audit
Committee has appointed PwC to serve as 3M’s Independent Accounting
Firm for 2023. PwC has been 3M’s Independent Accounting Firm since
1998. Prior to that, 3M’s Independent Accounting Firm was
Coopers & Lybrand from 1975 until its merger with Price
Waterhouse in 1998. In accordance with SEC rules and PwC policy,
audit partners are subject to rotation requirements to limit the
number of consecutive years an individual partner may provide
service to our Company. For lead and concurring audit partners, the
maximum number of consecutive years of service in that capacity is
five years. The process for selection of the Company’s lead audit
partner pursuant to this rotation policy involves a meeting between
the Chair of the Audit Committee and the candidate for the role, as
well as discussion by the full Committee and with
management.
The Audit
Committee annually reviews PwC’s independence and performance in
connection with the Audit Committee’s determination of whether to
retain PwC or engage another firm as our Independent Accounting
Firm. In the course of these reviews, the Audit Committee
considers, among other things:
● |
PwC’s historical and
recent performance on the 3M audit, including input from those 3M
employees with substantial contact with PwC throughout the year
about PwC’s quality of service provided, and the independence,
objectivity, and professional skepticism demonstrated throughout
the engagement by PwC and its audit team; |
|
|
● |
an
analysis of PwC’s known legal risks and significant
proceedings; |
|
|
● |
external
data relating to audit quality and performance, including recent
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board reports on PwC and its
peer firms; |
|
|
● |
PwC’s
independence; |
|
|
● |
the
appropriateness of PwC’s fees, on both an absolute basis and as
compared to its peer firms; |
|
|
● |
PwC’s
tenure as our independent auditor and its familiarity with our
global operations and businesses, accounting policies and practices
and internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
|
● |
PwC’s
capability and expertise in handling the breadth and complexity of
our global operations, including the Company’s phased
implementation of an enterprise resource planning system on a
worldwide basis over the next several years. |
Based on this evaluation,
the Audit Committee believes that PwC is independent and that it is
in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders to retain
PwC to serve as our Independent Accounting Firm for
2023.
2023 Proxy
Statement 51
Table of Contents
We are asking our
shareholders to ratify the selection of PwC as our Independent
Accounting Firm for 2023. Although ratification is not required by
our Bylaws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of
PwC to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good
corporate governance. If the selection of PwC is not ratified, the
Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select
another Independent Accounting Firm. Even if the selection is
ratified, the Audit Committee may in its discretion select a
different Independent Accounting Firm at any time during the year
if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests
of the Company and our shareholders.
PwC
representatives are expected to attend the Annual Meeting where
they will be available to respond to appropriate questions and, if
they desire, to make a statement.
Audit
Committee report
The Audit
Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on
behalf of the Board of Directors. The management of the Company is
responsible for (i) the preparation of complete and accurate annual
and quarterly consolidated financial statements (financial
statements) in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States, (ii) maintaining appropriate
accounting and financial reporting principles and policies and
internal controls designed to assure compliance with accounting
standards and laws and regulations, and (iii) an assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The
Independent Accounting Firm is responsible for planning and
conducting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) an audit of the Company’s annual
consolidated financial statements and a review of the Company’s
quarterly financial statements and expressing opinions on the
Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial
reporting based on the integrated audits.
In this
context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with
management and the Independent Accounting Firm regarding the fair
and complete presentation of the Company’s results and the
assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. The Audit Committee has discussed significant accounting
policies applied by the Company in its financial statements, as
well as alternative treatments. Management has represented to the
Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial
statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, and the Audit Committee
has reviewed and discussed the consolidated audited financial
statements with management and the Independent Accounting Firm. The
Audit Committee has discussed with the Independent Accounting Firm
matters required to be discussed pursuant to the applicable
requirements of the PCAOB and the Securities and Exchange
Commission with Audit Committees.
In
addition, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with the
Independent Accounting Firm the auditor’s independence from the
Company and its management. As part of that review, the Audit
Committee has received the written disclosures and the letters
required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the
Independent Accounting Firm’s communications with the Audit
Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has
discussed the Independent Accounting Firm’s independence from the
Company.
The Audit
Committee also has considered whether the Independent Accounting
Firm’s provision of non-audit services to the Company is compatible
with the auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee has concluded
that the Independent Accounting Firm is independent from the
Company and its management.
The Audit
Committee has discussed with the Company’s Internal Audit
Department and Independent Accounting Firm the overall scope of and
plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with
the Internal Auditor, Chief Compliance Officer, the General
Counsel, and representatives of the Independent Accounting Firm in
regular and executive sessions, to discuss the results of their
examinations, the evaluations of the Company’s internal controls,
and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting and
compliance programs.
In reliance
on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit
Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board
has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2022, for filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Submitted by the Audit Committee
David B. Dillon,
Chair
Thomas “Tony” K.
Brown
Pamela J.
Craig
Michael L.
Eskew
Dambisa F.
Moyo
Pedro J.
Pizarro joined the Audit Committee after the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 was filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and his name is
therefore not included in the above report.
52 3M
Company
Table of Contents
Audit Committee policy
on pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services of the
independent accounting firm
The Audit
Committee is responsible for appointing and overseeing the work of
the Independent Accounting Firm. The Audit Committee has
established a policy requiring its pre-approval of all audit and
permissible non-audit services provided by the Independent
Accounting Firm.
The policy
identifies the guiding principles that must be considered by the
Audit Committee in approving services to ensure that the
Independent Accounting Firm’s independence is not impaired;
describes the Audit, Audit-Related, Tax and All Other services that
may be provided and the non-audit services that may not be
performed; and sets forth the pre-approval requirements for all
permitted services. The policy provides for the pre-approval of
specific types of Audit, Audit-Related, Tax and Other services and
a limited fee estimate range for such services on an annual basis.
The policy also requires specific pre-approval of all permitted
services not already included in the annual pre-approval. The
Independent Accounting Firm is required to report periodically to
the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided in
accordance with their pre-approval and the fees for the services
performed to date.
The Audit
Committee’s policy delegates to its Chair the authority to address
requests for pre-approval of services in certain limited
circumstances between Audit Committee meetings. The chair, in his
discretion, must either seek immediate approval by e-mail from the
other Audit Committee members, or report any pre-approval decisions
to the Audit Committee for its approval at its next scheduled
meeting.
The Audit
Committee may not delegate to management the Audit Committee’s
responsibility to pre-approve permitted services of the Independent
Accounting Firm.
All Audit,
Audit-Related, Tax and All Other services described below were
approved by the Audit Committee before services were
rendered.
Fees of
the independent accounting firm
The
following table represents fees billed for professional services
rendered by PwC for the audit of the Company’s consolidated
financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2021 and
2022, and fees billed for other services rendered by PwC during
those periods.
Audit and non-audit
fees ($ in millions)
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
21.9 |
|
|
$ |
26.5 |
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Tax Fees |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
All Other Fees |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
22.9 |
|
|
$ |
27.2 |
|
In the above table, in
accordance with SEC rules, “Audit” fees consisted of audit work and
review services, as well as work generally only the independent
registered public accounting firm can reasonably be expected to
provide, such as statutory audits, comfort letters, consents, and
review of documents filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. In 2021 and 2022, these fees also included services
related to the carve-out audit of the Food Safety business. In
2022, these fees also included services related to the carve-out
audit of the Health Care business. “Audit-related” fees consisted
principally of internal control and system audit procedures for
periods prior to the rollout of the ERP system, agreed-upon
procedures, employee benefit plan audits, and other attestation
services. “Tax” fees consisted principally of tax compliance
services in foreign jurisdictions, assistance with transfer pricing
documentation, and advice on foreign and domestic tax related
matters. “All Other” fees consist of licenses for accounting
research software and other permissible services that do not fall
into the three categories listed above.
2023 Proxy
Statement 53
Table of Contents
Audit Committee
restrictions on hiring employees of the independent accounting
firm
The Audit
Committee has adopted restrictions on the hiring by the Company of
any PwC partner, director, manager, staff, reviewing actuary,
reviewing tax professional, and any other persons having
responsibility for providing audit assurance on any aspect of PwC’s
certification of the Company’s financial statements. Audit
assurance includes all work that results in the expression of an
opinion on financial statements, including audits of statutory
accounts.
54 3M
Company
Table of Contents
Proposal
3 |
|
Advisory Approval of
Executive Compensation |

“FOR”
|
|
● Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation
of our Named Executive Officers.
● Our executive compensation program
appropriately aligns our executives’ compensation with the
performance of the Company and its business units as well as their
individual performance.
Recommendation of the
Board
The
Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” this
proposal for the reasons discussed below. Proxies solicited by the
Board of Directors will be voted “FOR” this proposal unless
a shareholder indicates otherwise in voting the proxy.
|
Section
14A of the Exchange Act provides our shareholders with the
opportunity to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of
the Named Executive Officers as described in this Proxy Statement.
The Company has asked shareholders to vote on this type of
proposal, known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, every year since
2011.
We
believe that our executive compensation program is consistent with
our core compensation principles and is structured to assure that
those principles are implemented. At the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders held on May 10, 2022, approximately 88 percent of the
votes cast on this issue voted to approve the compensation of the
Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in last year’s
Proxy Statement. Although the vote was non-binding, the
Compensation and Talent Committee believes this level of approval
percentage indicates that our shareholders strongly support our
core compensation principles and our executive compensation
program.
Thus,
the Company is submitting to shareholders the following resolution
for their consideration and approval:
“RESOLVED, that the
shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the
Company’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy
Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (including in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and
related narrative).”
We encourage you to read
the entire Compensation Discussion and Analysis portion of this
Proxy Statement to learn more about our executive compensation
program and the impact that our financial performance has on the
annual and long-term incentive compensation earned by our
leadership team.
While
the Board of Directors and the Compensation and Talent Committee
intend to carefully consider the results of the voting on this
proposal when making future decisions regarding executive
compensation, the vote is not binding on the Company or the Board
and is advisory in nature. The Company currently holds advisory
votes on the compensation of named executive officers annually.
Assuming that the Company’s shareholders vote in favor of
maintaining the same frequency when voting on Proposal 4, the next
such advisory vote is expected to occur at the 2024 Annual
Meeting.
2023 Proxy
Statement 55
Table of Contents
Proposal
4 |
|
Advisory Approval on the Frequency
of Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation |

Every
“1 year”
|
|
● Approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of
advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive
officers.
Recommendation of the
Board
The
Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote in favor of
conducting an advisory vote on executive compensation every “1
year.” Proxies solicited by the Board of Directors will be
voted in favor of conducting an advisory vote on executive
compensation every “1 year” unless a shareholder indicates
otherwise in voting the proxy.
|
As
required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the Company is
providing its shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory
vote on the frequency with which shareholders will be offered the
opportunity to cast future advisory votes on the compensation of
its named executive officers. Shareholders may choose from the
following alternatives: 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, or to abstain
from voting on this proposal.
After
careful consideration, the Board of Directors recommends annual (“1
Year”) advisory votes on the compensation of the Company’s
executives. It continues to believe that annual votes will provide
the clearest and most useful feedback from shareholders to the
Company and the Compensation and Talent Committee in this important
area and will confirm the Company’s commitment to frequent and
transparent communications with investors.
Shareholders
are not voting to approve or disapprove of the Board’s
recommendation. Instead, shareholders have four choices with
respect to this proposal: “1 Year,” “2 Years,” “3 Years,” or
“Abstain.” For the reasons discussed above, we are asking our
shareholders to vote for a frequency of “1 Year” when voting on
this proposal.
While
the Board of Directors and especially the Compensation and Talent
Committee intend to carefully consider the results of the voting on
this proposal, the vote is not binding on the Company or the Board
and is advisory in nature.
56 3M
Company
Table of Contents
Compensation
discussion and analysis
This
Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes 3M’s executive
compensation program, explains how 3M’s Compensation and Talent
Committee oversees and implements this program, and reviews the
2022 compensation for the executive officers identified below.
Throughout this Compensation Discussion and Analysis and elsewhere
in this Proxy Statement, we refer to this group of individuals as
the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs.” The titles shown below
reflect the position of each Named Executive Officer as of March 1,
2023.
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Michael F. Roman
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Monish Patolawala
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Transformation
Officer |
|
Peter D. Gibbons
Group President, Enterprise Operations |
|
Jeffrey R. Lavers
Group President, Consumer and Interim Group President, Health
Care |
|
Michael G. Vale
Group President, Safety and Industrial |
|
Mojdeh Poul(1)
Former Group President, Health Care |
(1) |
Ms. Poul retired from employment with the
Company, effective July 1, 2022. |
See
Appendix B to this Proxy Statement for the meaning of certain
capitalized terms used throughout this Compensation Discussion and
Analysis.
2023 Proxy
Statement 57
Table of Contents
Section I:
Executive overview
2022
was a pivotal year for 3M. The Company took decisive actions that
are foundational for our future, while maintaining an unwavering
focus on the priorities of our shareholders, the needs of our
customers, and our broader stakeholders.
Navigating
macroeconomic challenges
The
combination of ongoing litigation challenges together with
significant external uncertainties, including inflation, supply
chain disruptions, and slowing sales in key end-markets, impacted
the Company’s total shareholder return performance. In response,
the Company took action to address inflation through selling price
actions, proactively managed costs as demand softened throughout
the year, and continued to address litigation challenges. To
address supply chain disruptions, we did what was necessary to
serve customers and reduce cycle times. We also navigated
COVID-related lockdowns in China, reached agreement with the
Flemish government to restart operations in Zwijndrecht, and exited
our Russian business.
Building a stronger,
leaner, and a more focused 3M
In
2022, we delivered the following financial results:
● |
Organic sales growth of 1.2 percent, which
included a 2.0 percent headwind from the decline in disposable
respirator demand and the Russia exit; |
|
|
● |
Adjusted EPS of $10.10;(1) |
|
|
● |
Adjusted free cash flow of $4.7 billion;(1) |
|
|
● |
Adjusted free cash flow conversion of 82
percent;(1) |
|
|
● |
Reduced total debt by $1.4 billion to strengthen our balance
sheet; and |
|
|
● |
Returned $4.8 billion to shareholders through dividends and
share repurchases. |
We
divested our Food Safety business, receiving approximately $1
billion in consideration and reducing our outstanding share count
by 16 million. We continued to progress the spin-off of our Health
Care business, which will create two world-class public companies,
each better positioned to drive growth and value creation. We also
simplified and streamlined our supply chain organization and
advanced our digital strategies to better serve
customers.
As
always, we put 3M science to work to solve customer needs and
continued to make progress against our sustainability commitments
to support employee health, safety, and well-being — including new
flexible work arrangements and investments in our factories — and
to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion priorities throughout
our organization and the communities we serve.
Executive compensation
program aligned with shareholders
Despite
many of our positive financial and strategic results during 2022,
as previously mentioned, we also faced several business challenges
relating to ongoing litigation and an extremely fluid global
macroeconomic and geopolitical environment with slowing growth,
inflation, and supply chain disruptions. 3M’s executive
compensation program outcomes for 2022 reflected our slower than
expected growth with pay realized by the Company’s executives in
2022 closely aligned with the experience of our
shareholder.
● |
The short-term incentive program paid out at
54 percent of target for our CEO and between 40.3 percent and 84.8
percent of target for our other Named Executive Officers; |
|
|
● |
The long-term performance shares for the 2020-2022 performance
period were earned at 94.8 percent of target, which represented
84.4 percent of the initial target grant value after considering
the change in market value of 3M’s common stock over the
performance period and accounting for the dividend equivalents
associated with earned performance shares; and |
|
|
● |
The Company’s 2022 performance also resulted in accruals
significantly below target, at 6.8 percent and zero percent of
target, for the 2022 performance year of the outstanding 2021
performance share awards (2021 – 2023 performance period, where
2022 performance is weighted 30 percent) and 2022 performance share
awards (2022 – 2024 performance period, where 2022 performance is
weighted 50 percent), respectively. |
(1) |
See Appendix A to this Proxy Statement for a
reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most
directly comparable GAAP financial measures. |
58 3M
Company
Table of Contents
Performance
metrics used in 3M’s 2022 annual and long-term incentive programs
reflected sharpened focus on the Company’s performance against the
operating plan, cash flow growth, inventory, and receivables
performance to position us for the future. The Committee also
approved a new ESG performance payout modifier for the 2022 annual
incentive program to support progress toward 3M’s sustainability
priorities and updated the benchmark used for the relative
performance metric in the 2022-2024 long-term incentive program to
improve alignment with 3M’s business portfolio.
As we
enter 2023, we are taking decisive actions to streamline the
organization and improve our manufacturing and supply chain
operations. We are staying close to our customers and continuing to
invest in innovation as we forge the foundation for 3M’s
sustainable growth built on the strength of 3M’s people,
industry-leading innovation, advanced manufacturing, global
capabilities, and our iconic brands.
2023 Proxy
Statement 59
Table of Contents
Recent
business accomplishments
Below are a
few noteworthy accomplishments from January 1, 2022, through March
1, 2023.
Performance |
|
● 2022 organic sales growth of 1.2 percent,
$10.10 adjusted earnings per share, adjusted free cash flow of $4.7
billion with adjusted free cash flow conversion of 82 percent,
while focusing on our customers and managing through an uncertain
global macroeconomic and geopolitical environment*
● Maintained strong spending discipline,
addressed inflation through selling price actions, and drove
operational improvements to address supply chain challenges
|
|
●
Strengthened the balance sheet providing financial
flexibility, reduced total debt by $1.4 billion, while returning
$4.8 billion to shareholders in 2022 via dividends and gross share
repurchases
●
Over 105 consecutive years of paying dividends to
shareholders and 65 consecutive years of ordinary dividend
increases
*
See Appendix A to this Proxy
Statement for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures
to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innovating
for the future |
|
● Continued to innovate for customers and
capitalize on growth, productivity, and sustainability
opportunities
● Invested $3.6 billion in the combination of
research and development and capital expenditures to position 3M
for the future, including investments focused on growth,
productivity, and sustainability — particularly water and air
stewardship
●
3M innovation reduced customer GHG emissions by
helping avoid emitting over 121 million metric tons of
CO2 equivalent. At the same time, reduced 54.2 million
pounds of virgin fossil-based plastic use in products and
packaging
|
|
● Launched 139 new products across our four
market-leading business groups
● Awarded a total of 2,600 patents from patent
offices around the world in 2022, including 562 patents granted to
3M by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, which brings
to nearly 132,000 total patents awarded to 3M since our
inception
●
Invested in projects to reduce water usage, install
purification technology at largest water-using locations and return
higher quality water to the environment after usage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio
management |
|
● Announced the spin-off of our Health Care
business with a focus on creating a leading global diversified
healthcare company and a more focused 3M
●
Enhanced shareholder value through active portfolio
management, including the divestiture of our Food Safety business,
consumer skin care brands Neobun™ and Neoplast™ in Thailand, and
floor care products business in Europe, and the acquisition of
LeanTec’s technology assets to advance digital solutions for auto
body shops
●
Prioritized investments in growth, productivity,
and sustainability
|
|
●
Continued to invest in growth opportunities,
aligned to global trends that take best advantage of 3M innovation,
including in automotive electrification, industrial automation,
biopharma processing, and home improvement
● Following through on sustainability
commitments: investing $1 billion over 20 years to accelerate air
and water stewardship and plastics reduction goals
● Committed to exit PFAS manufacturing by the
end of 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transforming
3M operating
model |
|
● Advanced our business group-led operating
model, including simplifying and streamlining our organization and
further aligning to customers and go-to-market models for improved
growth, operating agility, and accountability |
|
● Focused on transformation including adjusting
our operations and supply chain structure to the changing economic
realities and advancing our digital strategies to better serve
customers and improve efficiency of operations |
|
|
|
|
|
People
and
culture |
|
●
Advanced diversity, equity, and inclusion within 3M
and its communities with new investments and initiatives; issued
annual diversity, equity, and inclusion report to strengthen
accountability and transparency
● Continued to focus on employee health, safety,
and well-being, including new flexible work arrangements and
factory investments
|
|
●
Honored by Ethisphere® Institute as one
of “The World’s Most Ethical Companies®” for the
9th consecutive year
● Recognized as one of the “25 incredible
companies that are building the best workplace cultures in the
world.” 3M also secured 15 National Best Workplaces™ Awards
|
60
3M Company
Table of Contents
Elements of 2022
target total direct compensation
The table
below shows how the 2022 target Total Direct Compensation of the
Named Executive Officers was apportioned among base salary, annual
incentives, performance share awards, stock options, and restricted
stock units (RSUs), summarizes the rationale for providing and key
characteristics of each such element, and lists the performance
metrics, weightings, and modifiers used for annual and long-term
incentives granted in 2022.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 Pay
Elements(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
2022
Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO |
Other
NEOs |
|
Why It Is
Provided |
|
Key
Characteristics |
|
Metrics,
Weightings,
and Modifiers(2) |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
● Compensate executives for their normal
day-to-day responsibilities |
|
● Only component of compensation that is
considered to be fixed rather than variable in nature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
● Motivate executives to stay focused on
day-to-day operations by aligning a significant portion of Total
Cash Compensation with the near-term financial performance of the
Company and its business units |
|
● Performance metrics and goals approved
by the Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent
directors
● Payouts based on performance against
preestablished business objectives over a 12-month period
● Payouts adjusted or left unchanged based
on individual performance against preestablished goals and
objectives and the Committee’s determination of 3M’s holistic
performance against a set of preestablished objective ESG
metrics
● Payouts cannot exceed 200% of an
executive’s weighted-average target annual incentive amount
|
|
● Local Currency Sales (of 3M or a
business unit, as applicable) vs. Plan (50%)
● Operating Income (of 3M or a business
unit, as applicable) vs. Plan (30%)
● 3M Operating Cash Flow Conversion vs.
Plan (20%)
● Individual performance multiplier (±
20%)
● ESG modifier (± 10% of target)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Performance
Shares
 |

|
|
● Motivate executives to focus on
continuously improving performance in key financial metrics
believed to drive long-term shareholder value
● Retain executive talent
|
|
● Performance metrics and goals approved
by the Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent
directors
● Payouts based on performance against
preestablished goals over three years
● Maximum payout equal to 200% of the
target number of performance shares
● Cash-settled dividend equivalent rights
that are payable only if the underlying shares are earned
|
|
● Earnings per Share Growth (33.3%)
● Free Cash Flow Growth (33.3%)
● Relative Organic Sales Growth
(33.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Options(3)

|

|
|
● Motivate executives to build long-term
shareholder value
● Retain executive talent
|
|
● Provide value only if stock price
increases
● Exercise price equal to the grant date
closing price for a share of 3M common stock
● Ratable three-year vesting schedule
● Maximum term of 10 years
|
|
● Vesting is based on continued service,
while value of the options is based on stock price appreciation
(100%) |
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units(3)

|

|
|
● Motivate executives to build long-term
shareholder value
● Retain executive talent
|
|
● Three-year “cliff” vesting schedule
● Cash-settled dividend equivalent rights
that are payable only if the underlying shares are earned
|
|
● Vesting is based on continued service,
while value of the RSUs is based on total shareholder return
(100%) |
(1) |
Percentages shown reflect the apportionment
(or, in the case of the percentages shown for the Other NEOs, the
average |
2023 Proxy
Statement 61
Table of Contents
|
apportionment) of the components of target total direct
compensation that are expected to be recurring. Such amounts do not
reflect special items such as hiring bonuses, one-time make-whole
and inducement awards granted in connection with the commencement
of employment, or retention awards. The percentages shown for the
Other NEOs also do not reflect items provided to Ms. Poul, who
retired in 2022. If Ms. Poul had been included, the percentages
shown would have been as follows: Base Salary — 16%; AIP — 16%;
PSAs — 34%; Stock Options — 17%; and RSUs — 17%. Numbers may not
add to 100 percent due to rounding. |
(2) |
In determining
the level of achievement of the performance goals established under
the AIP and the performance share awards for any given period, the
costs, sales and impact on assets and liabilities from acquisitions
are excluded in the year that the acquisition is completed. The
Committee also makes other adjustments from time to time for
special items that it believes are unrelated to the operational
performance of the Company for the relevant measurement period
(e.g., changes in tax laws or accounting principles, asset
write-downs, the impact of restructurings, divestitures, or asset
sales, unusual tax transactions, litigation or claim judgments and
settlements, and other special items described in management’s
discussion and analysis of financial conditions and results of
operations appearing in the Company’s annual/quarterly report to
shareholders for the applicable period). These adjustments can have
either a positive or negative impact on award payouts. |
(3) |
For the Company’s
CEO, the Committee chose to deliver 50 percent of the target grant
value of his annual long-term incentive awards in the form of
performance shares and the remaining 50 percent in the form of
stock options. Each of the Company’s other executives was given an
opportunity to indicate a preference to receive 50 percent of the
target grant value of their annual long-term incentive awards in
the form of RSUs, stock options, or an equal split of both stock
options and RSUs. Regardless of an executive’s indicated
preference, the remaining 50 percent of the target grant value of
his or her 2022 annual long-term incentive awards was delivered in
the form of performance shares. The percentages shown reflect the
apportionment of stock options and RSUs based on the NEO’s 2022
elections (other than our CEO, who was not offered an opportunity
to make an election). |
62
3M Company
Table of Contents
Paying
for performance
One
objective of our incentive compensation program is to align our
Named Executive Officers’ real pay delivery with performance. The
Company’s performance directly impacted incentive compensation pay
outcomes for our Named Executive Officers as discussed
below.
2022
annual incentive compensation
For the Named Executive Officers whose 2022
annual incentive compensation payout was calculated based on the
Company’s overall performance, the payout (before any adjustment
for individual performance) was 54.0 percent of the target amount.
The payouts reflect the Committee’s view of our performance against
the financial goals established for 2022, as shown below, and its
decision not to increase or decrease the payouts using the ESG
modifier. |
|
All 2022 financial performance targets for the AIP were set at
or above 2021 results. In approving these targets, the Committee
considered 3M’s internal business plans, which were reviewed and
approved by the Board and reflected external market conditions,
continuing uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and other
items. The targets were intended to be challenging and provide a
similar level of rigor as those established for past years in order
to provide a consistent incentive compensation
opportunity. |
Dollar
Amounts in Millions

(1) |
See Appendix A for the calculation of
Operating Income and Operating Cash Flow Conversion. |
For more information
concerning the calculation of the 2022 annual incentive payout for
each Named Executive Officer, including the threshold, target, and
maximum goals and attainments used to calculate the annual
incentive payouts of the Named Executive Officers who are paid, in
part, based on the performance of a business group, see “2022 AIP
attainments and payouts” on page 75.
Performance share
award payouts and accruals (long-term incentive
compensation)
The
three-year performance period for the 2020 performance share awards
issued to the Named Executive Officers ended on December 31, 2022.
Based on the financial results achieved during 2020 – 2022 and
excluding dividend equivalents, the Named Executive Officers
received 94.8 percent of the target performance shares subject to
their 2020 performance share awards. After considering the change
in the market value of 3M’s common stock over the three-year
performance period and the additional shares delivered pursuant to
the dividend equivalent rights granted as part of the 2020
performance share awards, the value of the total number of 3M
shares delivered to the Named Executive Officers in settlement of
these awards (determined using the closing price of a share of 3M
common stock on the NYSE for December 31, 2022) equaled 84.4
percent of the initial target grant value approved by the
Committee.
2023 Proxy
Statement 63
Table of Contents
When
evaluating the payouts for these awards against the Company’s
performance, it is important to keep in mind the weightings applied
to each year (2020 — 50 percent; 2021 — 30 percent; and 2022 — 20
percent) and each metric (Relative Organic Volume Growth — 40
percent; Return on Invested Capital — 20 percent; Earnings per
Share Growth — 20 percent; and Free Cash Flow Conversion — 20
percent). As illustrated in the charts below, the payout of 2020
performance share awards reflects the mixed results achieved during
the performance period.
2020
performance share award results (2020-2022 performance
period)
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
Levels |
|
Payout
Level
(% of
Target) |
|
Performance
Year and
Weighting |
|
Actual
Result* |
|
Actual
Payout
(% of
Target) |
Earnings Per Share Growth |
|
|
Threshold** |
|
4% |
|
4% |
|
Year 1 – 50% |
|
–5.7% |
|
0% |
|
Target |
|
8% |
|
20% |
|
Year 2 – 30% |
|
14.4% |
|
12% |
|
Maximum |
|
12% |
|
40% |
|
Year 3 – 20% |
|
–0.2% |
|
0% |
Relative Organic Volume Growth |
 |
|
Threshold** |
|
–1% |
|
8% |
|
Year 1 – 50% |
|
2.6% |
|
40% |
|
Target |
|
0.5% |
|
40% |
|
Year 2 – 30% |
|
0.1% |
|
9.4% |
|
Maximum |
|
2% |
|
80% |
|
Year 3 – 20% |
|
–7.2% |
|
0% |
Return on Invested Capital |
 |
|
Threshold** |
|
18% |
|
4% |
|
Year 1 – 50% |
|
17.1% |
|
0% |
|
Target |
|
20% |
|
20% |
|
Year 2 – 30% |
|
19.5% |
|
4.8% |
|
Maximum |
|
23% |
|
40% |
|
Year 3 – 20% |
|
18.4% |
|
1.5% |
Free Cash Flow Conversion |
 |
|
Threshold** |
|
95% |
|
4% |
|
Year 1 – 50% |
|
132% |
|
20% |
|
Target |
|
100% |
|
20% |
|
Year 2 – 30% |
|
101% |
|
7.1% |
|
Maximum |
|
105% |
|
40% |
|
Year 3 – 20% |
|
82% |
|
0% |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.8% |
|
|
* |
Results reflect certain
adjustments that the Committee believed were appropriate to better
reflect the Company’s performance during the performance period.
See Appendix A to this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of
earnings per share, free cash flow, and free cash flow conversion
to our results for the most directly comparable financial measures
as reported under GAAP, and the calculation of return on invested
capital. |
** |
No payout is provided for below threshold performance. |
The Company’s 2022
performance will also impact the payouts of the 2021 performance
share awards and 2022 performance share awards, where the weighting
of 2022 performance is 30 percent and 50 percent, respectively. To
illustrate this point, the charts below show the percent of target
performance shares accrued each year during the relevant
performance period based on the Company’s performance.
Percent
of target performance shares accrued by year*
(excluding dividend equivalents)
 |
|
The final
payout percentage for each performance share award equals the sum
of the payout percentages for each year during the performance
period based on the Company’s performance against the financial
goals approved by the Committee at the beginning of the performance
period. |
* |
Amounts shown reflect the percent of target
shares accrued based on the performance results for the specified
year. The sum of the percentages accrued for each year during the
performance period may differ slightly from the final total payout
reported due to rounding. |
For more
information concerning the overall status of the performance share
awards that were outstanding on December 31, 2022, the metrics,
goals and weightings for such awards, and the impact that the
Company’s 2022 performance had on such awards, see “Status of
outstanding performance share awards” and “Performance share
accruals based on 2022 performance” beginning on pages 78 and 80,
respectively.
64
3M Company
Table of Contents
Impact
of changes in stock price
The
performance of 3M’s stock has a material impact on the amount of
compensation realized by our Named Executive Officers. Our stock
ownership guidelines also require covered executives, including the
Named Executive Officers, to own amounts of Company stock having a
value exceeding a specified multiple of their base salary. If the
market price of 3M’s stock declines, so does the value of the stock
they own. Similarly, all long-term incentives awarded to our Named
Executive Officers are equity-based and therefore increase or
decrease in value consistent with 3M’s total shareholder return or,
in the case of stock options, the value of 3M’s common
stock.
The stock
and stock options held by our Named Executive Officers throughout
2022 decreased in value during the year as the closing price for a
share of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE decreased from
$177.63 on December 31, 2021, to $119.92 on December 30, 2022, at
which time all outstanding stock options held by our Named
Executive Offers were underwater. Likewise, the value of the
performance shares and restricted stock units held by our Named
Executive Officers throughout the year decreased consistent with
the one-year total shareholder return for the Company’s
stock.
The chart
below shows how our CEO’s target Total Direct Compensation for each
of the last three fiscal years compared to his realizable pay as of
the end of each such year and demonstrates that our compensation
programs have been working as the Committee intended to align our
CEO’s realizable pay to the Company’s performance. Realizable pay
provides a retrospective look at pay versus performance that
reflects the intrinsic value of equity awards granted during the
year.
Target Total Direct
Compensation vs. Realizable CEO Compensation ($
millions)

Amounts
reflected in the realizable compensation figures shown in the chart
above reflect (a) base salary earned during the year specified; (b)
annual incentive compensation earned during the year specified; (c)
the intrinsic value of all stock options granted to our CEO during
the year specified, as determined using the closing price for a
share of 3M common stock on the NYSE for December 30, 2022
($119.92); and (d) the intrinsic value of performance share awards
(including the related dividend equivalents) granted to our CEO
during the year specified, as determined based on actual
performance results for years 2020 through 2022, assuming target
performance for years after 2022, and using the closing price for a
share of 3M common stock on the NYSE for December 30, 2022
($119.92). These amounts do not correspond to amounts reported in
the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable fiscal
year.
2023 Proxy Statement
65
Table of Contents
Say-on-pay
results
3M has a
history of strong say-on-pay results. As it has in past years, the
Committee will consider the results of this year’s say-on-pay
proposal, as well as feedback from our shareholders, when making
future executive compensation decisions.
For
information concerning our investor outreach efforts, see
“Shareholder outreach and engagement” on page 11.
|
|
3-year
average votes cast in favor of say-on-pay proposal |
 |
Recent noteworthy
compensation program actions
Since
January 1, 2022, the Committee took the noteworthy actions
described below as part of the Company’s executive compensation
program.
● |
Effective for the 2022
annual incentive compensation program offered to eligible
employees, updated the metrics and weightings with the intent of
sharpening focus on performance against the operating plan,
prioritizing operating cash flow conversion as a key driver of
operating value, and enhancing focus on inventory and receivables
performance. For more information about the new design, see “Annual
incentive” on page 71. |
● |
Added a new ESG modifier to the
formula used to calculate the annual incentive compensation earned
by the Company’s senior executives, including our Named Executive
Officers. Beginning in 2022, amounts earned by the Company’s senior
executives may be increased 10 percent of target, decreased 10
percent of target, or left unchanged based on the Committee’s
assessment of 3M’s performance against a selection of pre-set
objective ESG goals. For more information about the new ESG
modifier, see “Annual incentive — ESG Modifier” on page 72. |
● |
Effective for grants made to
executives in 2022, updated the metrics, weightings, and certain
other aspects of the Company’s performance share awards. The
changes generally are intended to strengthen the link to value
creation for 3M in the current environment and better align the
macro benchmark used as the basis of the relative metric with 3M’s
business portfolio. For more information, see “Long-term incentives
— 2022 performance share awards” on page 72. |
● |
Beginning with the annual grants
made in 2022, increased (from 25 percent to 50 percent) the portion
of the target grant value that the Company’s executives (other than
our CEO) may ask to receive in the form of stock options,
restricted stock units, or a combination of both. Regardless of an
executive’s indicated preference, the remaining 50 percent of the
target grant value of his or her 2022 annual long-term incentive
awards was delivered in the form of performance shares. |
● |
Effective August 11, 2022, amended the Executive Severance Plan
to cap at target the amount of any payment under the Annual
Incentive Plan that relates to the period following the
participant’s termination of employment. |
66
3M Company
Table of Contents
Compensation
policies and practices
Our
compensation program is designed to provide appropriate performance
incentives and avoid compensation practices that do not promote the
interests of our shareholders.
|
We do
|
|
|
We do not
|
|
Maintain strong alignment between corporate performance and
executive officer compensation by having a majority of Total Direct
Compensation consist of performance-based compensation.
Conduct
an annual assessment for the purpose of identifying and mitigating
significant economic and reputational risks in the design of our
incentive compensation programs.
Have
a comprehensive clawback policy that covers both cash and equity
compensation and includes provisions addressing reputational and
financial risk as well as risk management failures.
Maintain
a long-term incentive plan that provides for forfeiture of awards
if an employee engages in misconduct.
Use
an independent compensation consultant retained by, and reporting
directly to, the Committee.
Limit
the number and amount of executive perquisites.
Prohibit
our executive officers from hedging or pledging 3M common
stock.
Maintain
robust stock ownership guidelines for executive officers.
Conduct
competitive benchmarking to align executive compensation with the
market.
|
|
|
Have
employment or change in control agreements with any of our
executive officers.
Provide
tax gross ups on executive perquisites, other than for taxable
relocation benefits.
Have
agreements that would provide automatic “single-trigger”
accelerated vesting of equity compensation or excise tax gross-up
payments to any of our executive officers upon a change in
control.
Pay
dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned equity awards.
Reprice
stock options without the approval of 3M shareholders, except for
“anti-dilution” adjustments (such as adjustments in connection with
a stock split, spinoff, etc.).
|
Section
II: How we determine executive compensation
Principles
The
Company maintains global compensation principles that are intended
to ensure that our compensation practices are fair and reasonable
as applied to both executive and non-executive employees. These
principles align with the Company’s vision and strategies, balance
both individual and enterprise performance, and seek to provide
wages and benefits that are competitive in the most-relevant
markets to employees based on roles, responsibilities, skills, and
performance.
With
respect to 3M’s executive compensation program, we use the
following core principles, which are intended to support our
pay-for-performance philosophy:
● |
Total Direct Compensation should be
competitive to attract the best talent to 3M, motivate executives
to perform at their highest levels, reward individual contributions
that improve the Company’s ability to deliver outstanding
performance, and retain those executives with the leadership
abilities and skills necessary for building long-term shareholder
value; |
|
|
● |
The portion of Total Direct Compensation that is at-risk and
performance-based should increase with the level of an individual’s
responsibility; |
|
|
● |
The program should balance incentives for delivering
outstanding long-term, sustainable performance against the
potential to encourage inappropriate risk-taking; |
|
|
● |
The metrics and targets for earning performance-based
incentives should be consistent with, and aligned to, increasing
shareholder value over the long term; and |
|
|
● |
A significant portion of each executive’s personal net worth
should be tied to the value of 3M common stock as further
motivation to build long-term shareholder value and mitigate the
risk of inappropriate risk-taking. |
To monitor and support the
effectiveness of this program, the Committee periodically reviews
the compensation principles used for setting target annual Total
Cash Compensation for the Company’s global workforce and approves
the methodology for determining annual long-term incentive target
grant values for employees eligible to receive such awards. The
Company also periodically compares its pay components to those of
other premier companies and adjusts them as necessary to stay
competitive and attract, retain, and motivate a highly qualified,
diverse workforce at all levels throughout the organization, not
just for its executives.
2023 Proxy
Statement 67
Table of Contents
Roles
and responsibilities
The
Company believes that a collaborative process best ensures that
compensation decisions reflect the principles of our executive
compensation program. Set forth below is a summary of the roles and
responsibilities of the key participants that were involved in
making decisions relating to the compensation that our Named
Executive Officers earned in 2022.
Responsible Party |
|
Primary Roles and Responsibilities Relating to Compensation
Decisions |
Compensation and Talent Committee (Composed solely of
independent, non-employee directors and reports to the Board)
|
|
● Reviews the design of, and risks
associated with, the Company’s compensation policies and
practices;
● Approves the compensation of our Chief
Executive Officer, subject to ratification by the independent
members of the Board of Directors;
● Approves the compensation of our other
Named Executive Officers;
● Approves the performance metrics, goals,
modifiers, payout slopes, and other elements used in the
performance-based long-term and short-term incentive compensation
arrangements of our executive officers;
● Approves annual performance goals and
objectives for our Chief Executive Officer;
● Conducts an annual evaluation of our
Chief Executive Officer’s performance and reviews such evaluation
with the independent members of the Board of Directors; and
● Approves all changes to the composition
of the executive compensation peer group.
|
Independent Non-employee Members of the Board of
Directors |
|
● Considers the Committee’s annual
evaluation of our Chief Executive Officer’s performance; and
● Considers the Committee’s actions
regarding the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and, if
deemed appropriate, ratifies such actions.
|
Independent Consultant to the Compensation and Talent
Committee* (FW Cook) |
|
● Provides the Committee with advice
regarding the design of all elements of the Company’s executive
compensation program;
● Reviews and provides an assessment of the
material economic and reputational risks associated with the
Company’s incentive compensation programs;
● Reviews and provides an independent
assessment of materials provided to the Committee by management of
the Company;
● Provides advice and recommendations to
the Committee regarding the composition of compensation peer
groups;
● Provides expert knowledge of regulatory
developments, marketplace trends, and best practices relating to
executive compensation and competitive pay levels;
● Makes recommendations regarding the
compensation of the Named Executive Officers (including our Chief
Executive Officer); and
● Regularly attends and actively
participates in meetings of the Committee, including executive
sessions.
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Assisted by our Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources
Officer and other Company employees)
|
|
● Approves annual performance goals and
objectives for the Named Executive Officers (other than
himself);
● Conducts an annual performance evaluation
for each of the Named Executive Officers (other than himself) and
presents the results to the Committee; and
● Makes recommendations to the Committee
with respect to the compensation of the Named Executive Officers
(other than himself) based on the final assessment of their
performance.
|
|
|
* |
During 2022, the Committee was assisted by
its independent compensation consultant, FW Cook. Other than the
support that it provided to the Committee, FW Cook provided no
other services to the Company or 3M management, except for
independent advisory support to the Nominating and Governance
Committee on the compensation of 3M’s non-employee directors so
that valuation methodologies and peer groups are consistent with
those used for executives and other employees. During the year, the
Committee considered an evaluation of the independence of FW Cook
based on the relevant regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the NYSE listing standards. The Committee concluded
that the services performed by FW Cook did not raise any noteworthy
conflicts of interest. |
68 3M
Company
Table of Contents
Use
of market data
We
compete for executive talent in a global market. To ensure that we
are providing Total Direct Compensation that is competitive, the
Committee annually considers the available pay data of two peer
groups: an executive compensation peer group and a survey peer
group.
Executive
compensation peer group
For
2022, the executive compensation peer group consisted of the
companies identified below (which remained the same as in the
previous year), as recommended by the Committee’s independent
compensation consultant and approved by the Committee. The
companies in this executive compensation peer group were selected
because (1) their performance was monitored regularly by the same
market analysts who monitor the performance of 3M (investment
peers) and they are considered major business-segment competitors
used internally for performance comparisons, or (2) they met
certain criteria based on similarity of their business, market
capitalization (based on an eight-quarter rolling average), annual
revenues, and/or Midwest corporate headquarters, and compete with
3M for capital or talent.
(Dollars
in millions)
Latest Four Quarters Revenues(1) |
|
Johnson & Johnson |
$ 94,943 |
The Procter & Gamble Company |
$ 80,281 |
General Electric Company |
$ 76,555 |
The Boeing Company |
$ 66,608 |
Caterpillar Inc. |
$ 59,427 |
Deere & Company |
$ 55,646 |
Abbott Laboratories |
$ 43,653 |
Honeywell International Inc. |
$ 35,466 |
3M Company |
$ 34,229 |
Danaher Corporation |
$ 31,471 |
Medtronic plc |
$ 30,806 |
Johnson Controls International plc |
$ 25,505 |
Eaton Corporation plc |
$ 20,752 |
Kimberly-Clark Corporation |
$ 20,175 |
Emerson Electric Co. |
$ 19,846 |
Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
$ 17,182 |
TE Connectivity Ltd. |
$ 16,304 |
Illinois Tool Works Inc. |
$ 15,932 |
Corning Incorporated |
$ 14,189 |
DuPont de Nemours, Inc. |
$ 13,017 |
75th Percentile |
$ 57,537 |
Mean |
$ 38,829 |
Median |
$ 30,806 |
25th Percentile |
$ 18,514 |
3M Percentile Rank |
59% |
|
|
Trailing Eight-Quarter Average Market
Capitalization(1) |
Johnson & Johnson |
$ 441,620 |
The Procter & Gamble Company |
$
345,223 |
Danaher Corporation |
$
199,600 |
Abbott Laboratories |
$
199,175 |
Honeywell International Inc. |
$
134,831 |
Medtronic plc |
$
132,946 |
Deere & Company |
$
111,398 |
The Boeing Company |
$
110,910 |
Caterpillar Inc. |
$
110,735 |
General Electric Company |
$ 94,693 |
3M Company |
$ 83,375 |
Illinois Tool Works Inc. |
$ 66,274 |
Eaton Corporation plc |
$ 60,440 |
Emerson Electric Co. |
$ 52,773 |
Johnson Controls International plc |
$ 44,408 |
Kimberly-Clark Corporation |
$ 43,863 |
TE Connectivity Ltd. |
$ 41,703 |
Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
$ 37,266 |
DuPont de Nemours, Inc. |
$ 34,678 |
Corning Incorporated |
$ 29,484 |
75th Percentile |
$ 133,889 |
Mean |
$ 120,633 |
Median |
$ 94,693 |
25th Percentile |
$ 44,135 |
3M Percentile Rank |
48% |
(1) |
All data shown was obtained from
Standard & Poor’s Capital IQ. Revenues are stated in
millions for the latest four quarters disclosed as of February 28,
2023. Market Capitalizations are stated in millions as of February
28, 2023. |
The
Committee, with assistance from its independent compensation
consultant, periodically reviews the composition of the executive
compensation peer group to determine whether any changes are
appropriate. Following its review in August 2022, the Committee
determined that no changes were needed at that time.
The
Company receives market surveys with pay data and information on
the executive compensation practices at the companies in 3M’s
executive compensation peer group from Aon plc.
Survey
peer group
For
2022, there were approximately 350 comparator companies in the
survey peer group. Although the number and identity of the
companies varies from year to year and from survey to survey, each
of the companies included in the survey peer group had annual
revenue exceeding $10 billion. All companies in the survey peer
group also participate in one or more executive compensation
surveys obtained from three consulting firms: Aon plc, FW Cook, and
Willis Towers Watson plc. Pay data for the survey peer group is
statistically regressed (based on annual revenues) to
recognize
2023 Proxy
Statement 69
Table of Contents
the
different sizes of the comparator companies as compared to the size
of 3M. The pay data for the survey peer group is then used to
assess the reasonableness of the executive compensation peer group
data received, helping to ensure that the Company’s compensation
objectives are being met. The Committee does not review the
identity of the companies in the survey peer group.
How
the Committee establishes target compensation levels
The
Committee considers pay data from the executive compensation peer
group as one of several reference points it uses to inform its
decisions about overall compensation opportunities and specific
compensation elements. The Committee does not benchmark specific
compensation elements or total compensation to any specific
percentile relative to the Peer Groups or the broader United States
market. The Committee instead applies informed judgment in
establishing targeted pay levels for the Named Executive Officers,
considering pay data from the executive compensation peer group and
other factors, such as:
● |
the breadth and complexity of the
executive’s duties and responsibilities; |
|
|
● |
the quality of the executive’s leadership; |
|
|
● |
the financial and operational performance of the business
activities for which the executive is responsible; |
|
|
● |
the executive’s ability to successfully achieve assigned goals
related to company culture; |
|
|
● |
the annual performance evaluation that Mr. Roman, assisted by
3M’s Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer and
other Company employees, completes for each Named Executive Officer
(other than himself) and the annual performance evaluation that the
Committee completes for Mr. Roman; |
|
|
● |
the executive’s ability to successfully achieve assigned goals
related to environmental, social, and governance matters, including
sustainability goals; |
|
|
● |
the executive’s performance rating for the prior year; |
|
|
● |
experience and time in their current position (or other
positions with comparable duties and responsibilities); and |
|
|
● |
internal pay equity. |
The
Committee also uses information on the executive compensation
practices at companies in the executive compensation peer group
when considering design changes to the Company’s executive
compensation program. Overall, the Company believes that use of
this information from the Peer Groups enables the Committee to
create better alignment between executive pay and performance and
to help ensure that 3M can attract and retain high-performing
executive leaders.
Section
III: Overview of compensation program design
Target
total direct compensation mix for 2022
The
illustrations below show how the 2022 target Total Direct
Compensation of our CEO and other Named Executive Officers was
apportioned among base salary, annual incentives, performance share
awards, restricted stock units, and stock options. To provide a
better representation of the intended mix of annual compensation
provided to the Named Executive Officers, the percentages shown
below do not take into consideration non-recurring special items
such as one-time make-whole and inducement awards granted in
connection with the commencement of employment or retention
awards.
Abbreviations:
AIP = annual incentive pay; PSAs = performance share awards; RSUs =
restricted stock units.
* |
Amounts shown reflect the average
apportionment for all Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Roman
and Ms. Poul. If Ms. Poul had been included, the percentages shown
would have been as follows: Base Salary — 16%; AIP — 16%; PSAs —
34%; Stock Options — 17%; and RSUs — 17%. Numbers may not add to
100 percent due to rounding. |
70
3M Company
Table of Contents
Annual
incentive
3M
provides its executives with an opportunity to earn annual
incentive compensation under the 3M Annual Incentive Plan, which we
refer to as the “AIP.” Participation in the AIP is intended to
align a significant portion of participants’ Total Cash
Compensation with the near-term financial performance of the
Company and its business units. Each executive is assigned a target
amount of annual incentive compensation as part of his or her
target Total Cash Compensation, but the actual amount paid under
the AIP depends on the financial performance of 3M and its relevant
business units and the executive’s individual performance, in each
case, measured against preestablished goals and
objectives.
New
AIP design for 2022. In consultation with its independent
compensation consultant and following discussions with management
of the Company, the Committee approved significant changes to the
design of the AIP offered to the Company’s executive officers in
2022 by:
● |
replacing the business unit and total 3M
economic profit metrics with new metrics tied to business unit
Operating Income and total 3M Operating Cash Flow Conversion to
sharpen focus on performance against the operating plan, prioritize
Operating Cash Flow Conversion as a key driver of operating value,
and enhance focus on inventory and receivables performance as key
contributors to cash; |
|
|
● |
updating the weightings to place a stronger emphasis on items
within the control of the business units and improve alignment with
market practices; and |
|
|
● |
adding a modifier to incentivize the executive team to exceed
the Committee’s expectations on progress toward our ESG goals and
hold them accountable when they fall short of the Committee’s
expectations. |
Basic
calculation. For 2022, the amount a participant earned under
the AIP was calculated using the formula shown below.

2023 Proxy Statement
71
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
Business performance factor. The
business performance factor is determined based on the performance
of 3M and, in some cases, the business unit(s) for which each Named
Executive Officer had responsibility throughout the year against
three metrics, as indicated in the table below. |
|
|
The 2022 performance target for each metric and business unit
shown was set at or above 2021 results. |
Performance
Metric |
|
|
|
Local
Currency
Sales vs. Plan |
|
Operating
Income
vs. Plan |
|
Operating
Cash
Flow Conversion
vs. Plan |
Weighting |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Business Unit Used
to Calculate Business
Performance Factor |
|
Mr. Roman |
|
3M Worldwide |
|
3M Worldwide |
|
3M Worldwide |
|
Mr. Patolawala |
|
3M Worldwide |
|
3M Worldwide |
|
3M Worldwide |
|
Mr. Gibbons |
|
3M Worldwide |
|
3M Worldwide |
|
3M Worldwide |
|
Mr. Lavers |
|
Consumer & 3M |
|
Consumer & 3M |
|
3M Worldwide |
|
|
|
Worldwide |
|
Worldwide |
|
|
|
Mr. Vale |
|
Safety and Industrial |
|
Safety and Industrial |
|
3M Worldwide |
|
Ms. Poul |
|
Health Care |
|
Health Care |
|
3M Worldwide |
Individual performance
multiplier. The amount of annual incentive compensation paid to
an eligible employee may be increased, decreased, or left unchanged
depending on his or her performance during the year. When
determining the individual performance multipliers to be used for
the Named Executive Officers, the Committee considers the
individual performance of the Named Executive Officers using the
performance evaluations described under “How the Committee
establishes target compensation levels” on page 70.
ESG
Modifier. Amounts earned by senior executives may be increased
by 10 percent of target, decreased by 10 percent of target, or left
unchanged based on the Committee’s determination of 3M’s holistic
performance against a set of preestablished, objective ESG metrics
(referred to as the “ESG Scorecard”). For 2022, the metrics
included on the ESG Scorecard related to the Company’s carbon and
water commitments; operational improvements in the area of
environment, health, and safety; progress on key social measures;
and on-time completion of required ethics and compliance
training.
Long-term
incentives
In
order to improve alignment with the Company’s practices for
non-executive employees and mitigate potential retention challenges
associated with pay delivery, the Committee increased (from 25
percent to 50 percent) the portion of the target grant value that
the Company’s executives (other than our CEO) may ask to receive in
the form of RSUs, stock options, or an equal split of both stock
options and RSUs. Regardless of an executive’s indicated
preference, the remaining 50 percent of the target grant value of
his or her 2022 annual long-term incentive awards was delivered in
the form of performance shares. For the Company’s CEO, the
Committee chose to deliver 50 percent of the target grant value of
his annual long-term incentive awards in the form of performance
shares and the remaining 50 percent in the form of stock options.
The terms of the 2022 performance share awards, 2022 stock options,
and 2022 restricted stock units are described in detail
below.
In
limited circumstances, our Named Executive Officers also may
receive other equity awards on an ad hoc basis as new hires or for
recognition and retention, promotions, or other purposes. For
additional information about a special restricted stock unit award
granted to Mr. Lavers in July 2022 in connection with a significant
expansion of his duties and responsibilities and as a further
incentive for Mr. Lavers to remain with the Company, see “Section
V: 2022 compensation decisions and performance highlights — Jeffrey
R. Lavers — Compensation Decisions” on page 84.
2022
performance share awards
In
consultation with its independent compensation consultant and
following discussions with management of the Company, the Committee
approved significant changes to the design of the performance
shares awarded in 2022 by:
● |
replacing the Free Cash Flow Conversion
metric with a Free Cash Flow Growth metric that is intended to
strengthen the link to shareholder returns by measuring cash flow
improvement; |
|
|
● |
replacing the Relative Organic Volume Growth metric with a
Relative Organic Sales Growth metric that is intended to enhance
alignment with the Company’s operating plan and external
guidance; |
72 3M
Company
Table of Contents
|
|
● |
eliminating
the Return on Invested Capital metric in order to place greater
emphasis on other metrics that are believed to have a stronger link
to value creation for 3M in the current environment;
and |
|
|
● |
changing
the benchmark used for the relative metric (from the Worldwide IPI
to a weighted blend of the Worldwide IPI and the Worldwide GDP for
the relevant period) in order to improve alignment of the macro
benchmark with 3M’s business portfolio. |
Performance
shares awarded in 2022 will result in the issuance of actual shares
of 3M common stock to 3M’s Named Executive Officers if the Company
achieves certain financial goals over the years 2022, 2023, and
2024. The number of shares of 3M common stock that will be issued
for each 2022 performance share is linked to the Company’s
performance as measured by the equally weighted criteria of
Earnings per Share Growth, Relative Organic Sales Growth, and Free
Cash Flow Growth. These performance criteria were selected because
they are aligned with 3M’s operating plan and the financial
objectives communicated to shareholders, and the Committee believes
that they are important drivers of long-term shareholder value.
Attainment of these three independent performance criteria is
measured separately for each calendar year during the three-year
measurement period, with each year weighted as follows: 2022 — 50
percent; 2023 — 30 percent; and 2024 — 20 percent. However, the
targets against which the Company’s performance is measured over
the course of the three-year performance period are fixed at the
time the grant is awarded, subject to adjustments only in limited
circumstances (such as a stock split, spinoff, etc.).
The
actual number of shares of 3M common stock that will be delivered
at the end of the three-year performance period ending on December
31, 2024, may be anywhere from 0 percent to 200 percent of the
target number of performance shares awarded, depending on the
performance of the Company over the course of the performance
period. However, an executive may forfeit all or a portion of such
shares if he or she does not remain employed by the Company
throughout the three-year performance period. Each performance
share award also includes cash-settled dividend equivalent rights
that are payable only on the final number of shares
earned.
For
awards tied to the achievement of performance goals over the years
2022, 2023, and 2024, the Committee approved the targets shown
below for determining the number of shares of 3M common stock to be
delivered for each target performance share awarded, with the total
number of shares actually delivered being the sum of the number of
shares earned as a result of the Company’s achievement of each of
the three financial goals. If the Company’s performance as measured
by any of these performance criteria falls between any of the
percentages listed below, the number of shares of 3M common stock
earned will be determined by linear interpolation.
2022
Performance Share Award Targets |
|
|
|
|
2022
Performance
Levels* |
|
2023-2024
Performance
Levels* |
|
Payout Level
(% of Target) |
Earnings Per Share Growth |
 |
|
Threshold** |
|
1% |
|
3% |
|
6 2/3% |
|
|
Target |
|
4% |
|
6% |
|
33 1/3% |
|
|
Maximum |
|
7% |
|
9% |
|
66 2/3% |
Relative Organic Sales Growth |
 |
|
Threshold** |
|
–1.5% |
|
–1.5% |
|
6 2/3% |
|
|
Target |
|
0.0% |
|
0.0% |
|
33 1/3% |
|
|
Maximum |
|
1.5% |
|
1.5% |
|
66 2/3% |
Free
Cash Flow Growth |
 |
|
Threshold** |
|
-7% |
|
3% |
|
6 2/3% |
|
|
Target |
|
-4% |
|
6% |
|
33 1/3% |
|
|
Maximum |
|
-1% |
|
9% |
|
66 2/3% |
* |
After
considering the Company’s 2022 operating plan and its long-term
strategic plan, the Committee decided to set the threshold, target,
and maximum goals as shown based on expectations for each year,
with certain goals being set higher for 2023 and 2024. The
Committee believes all of the goals were set consistent with, and
aligned to, the Company’s strategic priorities and its objective of
increasing shareholder value over the long term. The 2022 Free Cash
Flow Growth target was set below 2021 results due to an anticipated
increase in capital expenditures for growth and sustainability
investments and the cash impact from capitalization of research and
development for U.S. tax purposes. The 2023-2024 Free Cash Flow
Growth target was set at a higher level, reflecting expectations
for a stronger macroeconomic environment. Each of the targets was
intended to be challenging and provide a similar level of rigor as
those established for past years in order to provide a consistent
incentive compensation opportunity. |
** |
No payout is
provided for below threshold performance. |
The above
targets are not a prediction of how 3M will perform during the
years 2022 through 2024 or any other period in the future. The sole
purpose of these formulas, which were approved by the Committee at
the time the awards were granted, is to establish a method for
determining the number of shares of 3M common stock to be delivered
for the performance share awards described above. 3M is not
providing any guidance, nor updating any prior guidance, of its
future performance with the disclosure of these formulas, and you
are cautioned not to rely on these formulas as a prediction of 3M’s
future performance.
2023 Proxy
Statement 73
Table of Contents
2022
stock options
Stock
options granted to the Named Executive Officers in 2022 as part of
their annual long-term incentive compensation have the following
features:
● |
an exercise price equal to the closing price
of a share of 3M common stock on the NYSE for the date of
grant; |
|
|
● |
a ratable three-year vesting schedule; and |
|
|
● |
a maximum term of 10 years. |
2022 restricted stock
units
Restricted
stock unit awards granted to the Named Executive Officers in 2022
as part of their annual long-term incentive compensation have the
following features:
● |
a three-year “cliff” vesting schedule;
and |
|
|
● |
cash-settled dividend equivalent rights that are payable only
if the underlying shares are earned. |
Benefits and
perquisites
The
Company’s Named Executive Officers participate in the same health
care, disability, life insurance, pension, and 401(k) benefit plans
available to most of the Company’s U.S. employees. They also are
eligible to receive certain additional benefits and perquisites
that are provided for the executives’ convenience (relocation
assistance for moves required by 3M, financial planning assistance,
and meals when attending to 3M business, for example), financial
security (nonqualified deferred compensation plans and additional
group term life insurance coverage, for example), personal security
(home security equipment/monitoring, for example) or personal
health (on-site exercise facilities and physical exams, for
example). Our Named Executive Officers and other employees also may
receive Company tickets for sporting or other events. The Company
believes that the benefits and perquisites offered generally are
similar to those of our peers and assist in attracting and
retaining executives. In some cases, there is no incremental cost
to the Company associated with providing these additional benefits
and perquisites (physical exams and certain tickets to events, for
example) or the executives pay all or a substantial portion of the
incremental costs incurred by the Company (on-site exercise
facilities, for example).
These
additional benefits and perquisites generally are provided on a
consistent basis only to a limited group of our most senior U.S.
employees (including all of the Named Executive Officers), although
enhanced personal security equipment and monitoring is provided
only to our Chief Executive Officer.
The
Company also operates aircraft that are used by our senior officers
and other employees to conduct company business. For personal
security reasons, the Board of Directors requires our Chief
Executive Officer to use the Company’s aircraft for all air travel,
both business and personal. Our Chief Executive Officer’s spouse
and other guests also may accompany him on flights.
The
incremental cost to the Company of providing these additional
benefits to the Named Executive Officers is reflected in the All
Other Compensation Table. No tax gross ups are provided on any of
these additional benefits and perquisites other than taxable
relocation benefits.
74
3M Company
Table of Contents
Section
IV: Incentive compensation attainments and awards
2022
AIP attainments and payouts
During
2022, the Committee provided the Named Executive Officers with the
opportunity to earn short-term incentive compensation under the
AIP. Each Named Executive Officer’s target annual incentive for the
year equaled the difference between his or her target Total Cash
Compensation and annual base salary (weighted to reflect mid-year
adjustments, if appropriate).
Business
performance factor. For purposes of measuring business
performance against the targets established for 2022 and converting
that performance into a business performance factor determined in
accordance with the terms of the AIP, each Named Executive Officer
was assigned to an appropriate business unit for each metric (the
entire Company, in some cases). The metrics, relevant business
unit, goals, and attainments used to calculate the business
performance factor for each Named Executive Officer are shown
below.
Business
performance factor calculation for Mr. Roman, Mr. Patolawala, Mr.
Gibbons, and, for the period July 1 thru December 31, Mr.
Lavers*, **
Dollar
amounts in millions
Performance
Metric |
|
Business
Unit |
|
Threshold
($) |
|
Target
($) |
|
Maximum
($) |
|
Actual vs.
Target |
|
Payout
% |
|
Weighting |
|
Weighted
Payout % |
Local
Currency
Sales vs. Plan |
|
3M
Worldwide |
|
 |
|
97% |
|
71.9% |
|
|
|
36.0% |
Operating
Income vs.
Plan |
|
3M
Worldwide |
|
 |
|
88% |
|
40% |
|
 |
|
12.0% |
Operating
Cash Flow
Conversion
vs. Plan |
|
3M
Worldwide |
|
 |
|
86% |
|
30% |
|
|
|
6.0% |
Business
Performance Factor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.0% |
Business
performance factor calculation for Mr. Lavers for the period
January 1 thru June 30*, **
Dollar
amounts in millions
Performance
Metric |
|
Business
Unit |
|
Threshold
($) |
|
Target
($) |
|
Maximum
($) |
|
Actual vs.
Target |
|
Payout
% |
|
Weighting |
|
Weighted
Payout % |
Local
Currency
Sales vs. Plan |
|
Consumer |
|
 |
|
93% |
|
34.4% |
|
|
|
17.2% |
Operating
Income vs.
Plan |
|
Consumer |
|
 |
|
79% |
|
0% |
|
 |
|
0.0% |
Operating
Cash Flow
Conversion
vs. Plan |
|
3M
Worldwide |
|
 |
|
86% |
|
30% |
|
|
|
6.0% |
Business
Performance Factor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.2% |
2023
Proxy Statement 75
Table of Contents
Executive compensation |
Executive compensation |
Business
performance factor calculation for Mr.
Vale*
Dollar
amounts in millions
Performance
Metric |
|
Business
Unit |
|
Threshold
($) |
|
Target
($) |
|
Maximum
($) |
|
Actual vs.
Target |
|
Payout
% |
|
Weighting |
|
Weighted
Payout % |
Local
Currency
Sales vs. Plan |
|
Safety
and Industrial |
|
 |
|
101% |
|
112.5% |
|
 |
|
56.3% |
Operating
Income vs.
Plan |
|
Safety
and Industrial |
|
 |
|
95% |
|
75% |
|
 |
|
22.5% |
Operating
Cash Flow
Conversion
vs. Plan |
|
3M
Worldwide |
|
 |
|
86% |
|
30% |
|
|
|
6.0% |
Business
Performance Factor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84.8% |
Business
performance factor calculation for Ms.
Poul*
Dollar
amounts in millions
|
|
* |
Results
reflect certain adjustments that the Committee believed were
appropriate to better reflect the Company’s performance during the
performance period. See Appendix A to this Proxy Statement for a
reconciliation of Operating Income and Operating Cash Flow
Conversion to our results for the most directly comparable
financial measures as reported under GAAP. |
** |
Consistent
with the approach taken for other employees who participate in the
AIP and support multiple businesses, Mr. Lavers was assigned to the
3M Worldwide business unit for the portion of the year that he
served as both Group President, Consumer and Interim Group
President, Health Care. |
Individual
performance multiplier. The amount of annual incentive
compensation paid to an eligible employee may be increased,
decreased, or left unchanged depending on his or her performance
during the year. The Committee determined the individual
performance multiplier for each Named Executive Officer, as shown
in the table under “Final 2022 AIP payouts” below, based upon the
annual performance evaluation completed for each Named Executive
Officer other than Ms. Poul. The Committee generally does not
conduct detailed performance assessments for executives who depart
the Company before the end of the year, but instead discusses the
former executive’s performance with the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer to determine whether a sufficient basis exists to increase
or decrease the executive’s AIP payout for the year on the basis of
individual performance. Following this approach, the Committee
discussed Ms. Poul’s 2022 performance with Mr. Roman and decided
not to increase or decrease the amount of her prorated 2022 AIP
payout based on individual performance. For a listing of selected
2022 performance highlights of each Named Executive Officer (other
than Ms. Poul), see “Section V: 2022 compensation decisions and
performance highlights” beginning on page 81.
76 3M
Company
Table of Contents
ESG
Modifier. Amounts earned by the Company’s senior executives may
be increased by 10 percent of target, decreased by 10 percent of
target, or left unchanged based on the Committee’s assessment of
3M’s overall performance against a collection of pre-set objective
ESG goals. For 2022, the ESG goals approved by the Committee
related to the Company’s carbon and water commitments, operational
improvements in the area of environment, health, and safety,
progress on key social measures, and on-time completion of required
ethics and compliance training. 3M successfully achieved most of
its 2022 ESG goals. After reviewing the Company’s performance, the
Committee decided not to increase or decrease the senior
executives’ 2022 annual incentive payouts using the ESG
modifier.
Final
2022 AIP payouts. At its meeting in February 2023, the
Committee approved (and with respect to Mr. Roman, the independent
members of the Board of Directors ratified) a payment under the AIP
to each Named Executive Officer, as shown below.
|
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
(d) |
|
(e)
= (a) × (b) ×
(c) + (d)
|
Named
Executive Officer |
|
Total
Weighted-
Average Target
AIP Payout*
($) |
|
Business
Performance
Factor
|
|
|
Individual
Performance
Multiplier**
|
|
ESG
Modifier
($)
|
|
Approved 2022
AIP Payout
($)
|
Michael
F. Roman |
|
2,460,938 |
|
54.0% |
|
|
100% |
|
— |
|
1,327,676 |
Monish
Patolawala |
|
1,224,917 |
|
54.0% |
|
|
120% |
|
— |
|
793,011 |
Peter
D. Gibbons |
|
774,299 |
|
54.0% |
|
|
100% |
|
— |
|
417,734 |
Jeffrey
R. Lavers |
|
729,370 |
|
40.3% |
*** |
|
100% |
|
— |
|
293,751 |
Michael
G. Vale |
|
773,381 |
|
84.8% |
|
|
100% |
|
— |
|
655,440 |
Mojdeh
Poul |
|
369,242 |
|
49.5% |
|
|
100% |
|
— |
|
183,107 |
|
|
* |
Amounts
shown reflect mid-year adjustments to target Total Cash
Compensation. The amounts shown for Ms. Poul also have been
prorated to reflect the portion of the year worked for the
Company. |
|
|
** |
For a
listing of selected 2022 performance highlights of each Named
Executive Officer, see “Section V: 2022 compensation decisions and
performance highlights” beginning on page 81. |
|
|
*** |
The
final Business Performance Factor shown reflects differences in the
target annual incentive compensation opportunity in effect for Mr.
Lavers during the portions of the year he was assigned to different
business units. |
2022
long-term incentive awards
After
considering the most recent long-term incentive compensation data
available from companies in the Peer Groups and after taking into
account its evaluation of their individual performance during 2021,
the Committee approved (and in the case of Mr. Roman, the
independent members of the Board of Directors ratified) the final
target grant values shown below for the Named Executive Officers’
2022 long-term incentive compensation awards. For ease of
comparison, the table below also shows the final target
compensation values of the Named Executive Officers’ 2021 long-term
incentive compensation awards.
Name |
|
Target
Grant
Value of 2021
Annual Awards
($) |
|
|
Target
Grant
Value of 2022
Annual Awards
($) |
|
Michael
F. Roman |
|
10,500,000 |
|
|
11,000,000 |
|
Monish
Patolawala |
|
4,290,000 |
|
|
5,590,000 |
|
Peter
D. Gibbons (joined 3M effective November 29, 2021) |
|
— |
* |
|
3,020,000 |
|
Jeffrey
R. Lavers |
|
2,081,000 |
|
|
2,700,000 |
** |
Michael
G. Vale |
|
2,705,300 |
|
|
3,020,000 |
|
Mojdeh
Poul |
|
2,081,000 |
|
|
3,926,000 |
|
|
|
* |
Excludes
the target grant value of special one-time make-whole and
inducement awards granted in connection with his commencement of
employment. |
|
|
** |
In May
2022, the Board approved a significant expansion of Mr. Lavers’
duties and responsibilities, effective July 1, 2022, to include
serving as the Interim Group President, Health Care, in addition to
his existing role as Group President, Consumer. The target grant
value of Mr. Lavers’ 2022 annual awards shown here excludes the
value of a special restricted stock unit award granted to him in
connection with the expansion of his duties and responsibilities
and as a further incentive for Mr. Lavers to remain with the
Company. For additional information, see “Section V: 2022
compensation decisions and performance highlights — Jeffrey R.
Lavers — Compensation Decisions” on page 84. |
2023
Proxy Statement 77
Table of Contents
Each of
the Company’s executives (other than its CEO) was given an
opportunity to indicate a preference to receive 50 percent of
the target grant value of their annual long-term incentive awards
in the form of RSUs, stock options, or an equal split of both stock
options and RSUs. Regardless of an executive’s indicated
preference, the remaining 50 percent of the target grant value of
their 2022 annual long-term incentive awards was delivered in the
form of performance shares. For the Company’s CEO, the Committee
chose to deliver 50 percent of the target grant value of his annual
long-term incentive awards in the form of performance shares and
the remaining 50 percent in the form of stock options.
Status
of outstanding performance share awards
The
Company’s annual award cycle and three-year performance periods
result in an overlap of awards. For example, the performance goals
for 2022 performance share awards relate to the years 2022, 2023,
and 2024. Similarly, the performance goals for 2021 performance
share awards relate to the years 2021, 2022, and 2023, and so on,
as shown below. Performance against the goals established for each
award are measured separately for each calendar year during the
measurement period, with each year weighted as shown below in
parenthesis. The Committee believes this structure reduces
motivation to maximize performance in any one period by providing
the highest-level rewards only by building sustainable long-term
results.
Award |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
2023 |
|
2019
PSA |
|
|
Year 1
(50%) |
|
|
|
Year 2
(30%) |
|
|
|
Year 3
(20%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020
PSA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1
(50%) |
|
|
|
Year 2
(30%) |
|
|
|
Year 3
(20%) |
|
|
|
|
|
2021
PSA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1
(50%) |
|
|
|
Year 2
(30%) |
|
|
|
Year 3
(20%) |
|
The
Committee periodically reviews the Company’s performance against
the goals established for each performance share award throughout
the duration of its measurement period. The tables below summarize
the status of the different performance share awards held by the
Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2022.
2022
PSA (2022-2024 measurement period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-year
Performance Period –
Actual Performance Level Achieved(1) |
Performance
Measures |
|
Performance
Levels |
|
2022
(Year 1;
weighted |
|
2023
(Year 2;
weighted |
|
2024
(Year 3;
weighted |
and
Weighting |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
at
50%) |
|
at
30%) |
|
at
20%) |
Earnings
per Share
Growth (33 1/3%)(2) |
|
2022:
1:0%
2023/24: 3.0% |
|
2022:
4:0%
2023/24: 6.0% |
|
2022:
7:0%
2023/24: 9.0% |
|
-0.2% |
|
|
|
|
Relative
Organic Sales
Growth (33 1/3%)(3) |
|
-1.5% |
|
0.0% |
|
1.5% |
|
-1.7% |
|
|
|
|
Free
Cash Flow
Growth (33 1/3%) |
|
2022:
-7:0%
2023/24: 3.0% |
|
2022:
-4:0%
2023/24: 6.0% |
|
2022:
-1:0%
2023/24: 9.0% |
|
-21.5% |
|
|
|
|
2021
PSA (2021-2023 measurement period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-year
Performance Period –
Actual Performance Level Achieved(1) |
|
|
Performance
Levels |
|
2021
(Year 1;
weighted |
|
2022
(Year 2;
weighted |
|
2023
(Year 3;
weighted |
Performance
Measures and Weighting |
|
Threshold |
|
Target
|
|
Maximum |
|
at
50%) |
|
at
30%) |
|
at
20%) |
Earnings
per Share Growth (20%)(2) |
|
4.0% |
|
8.0% |
|
12.0% |
|
14.4% |
|
-0.2% |
|
|
Relative
Organic Volume Growth (40%)(4) |
|
-1.0% |
|
0.5% |
|
2.0% |
|
0.1% |
|
-7.2% |
|
|
Return
on Invested Capital (20%) |
|
16.0% |
|
18.0% |
|
21.0% |
|
19.5% |
|
18.4% |
|
|
Free
Cash Flow Conversion (20%) |
|
95.0% |
|
100.0% |
|
105.0% |
|
100.9% |
|
81.8% |
|
|
78 3M
Company
Table of Contents
2020
PSA (2020-2022 measurement period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-year
Performance Period –
Actual Performance Level Achieved(1) |
|
|
Performance
Levels |
|
2020
(Year 1; |
|
2021
(Year 2; |
|
2022
(Year 3; |
Performance
Measures and Weighting |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
weighted
at 50%) |
|
weighted
at 30%) |
|
weighted
at 20%) |
Earnings
per Share Growth (20%)(2) |
|
4.0% |
|
8.0% |
|
12.0% |
|
-5.7% |
|
14.4% |
|
-0.2% |
Relative
Organic Volume Growth (40%)(4) |
|
-1.0% |
|
0.5% |
|
2.0% |
|
2.6% |
|
0.1% |
|
-7.2% |
Return
on Invested Capital (20%) |
|
18.0% |
|
20.0% |
|
23.0% |
|
17.1% |
|
19.5% |
|
18.4% |
Free
Cash Flow Conversion (20%) |
|
95.0% |
|
100.0% |
|
105.0% |
|
132.3% |
|
100.9% |
|
81.8% |
|
|
(1) |
Results
reflect certain adjustments that the Committee believed were
appropriate to better reflect the Company’s performance during the
performance period. See Appendix A to this Proxy Statement for a
reconciliation of earnings per share, free cash flow, and free cash
flow conversion to our results for the most directly comparable
financial measures as reported under GAAP, and the calculation of
return on invested capital. |
|
|
(2) |
For
purposes of calculating Earnings per Share Growth for any given
fiscal year, the baseline earnings per share figure is set equal to
the final adjusted earnings per share figure used to calculate the
Earnings per Share Growth attainment for the preceding year. As a
result, any increase in earnings per share attributable to
adjustments in one fiscal year necessarily will make it more
difficult for the Company to achieve its Earnings per Share Growth
target in the following year. |
|
|
(3) |
The
reported level of performance for Relative Organic Sales Growth has
been determined, in part, using a weighted blend of Worldwide IPI
and Worldwide GDP, as reported by S&P Global Market
Intelligence on January 17, 2023. |
|
|
(4) |
The
reported level of performance achieved for Relative Organic Volume
Growth has been determined, in part, using the Worldwide IPI for
each relevant period, as reported by S&P Global Market
Intelligence on January 17, 2023. The final performance level
achieved may vary based on changes in reported Worldwide IPI for
the relevant period. |
2023
Proxy Statement 79
Table of Contents
Performance
share accruals based on 2022 performance
The
table below shows the number of shares of 3M common stock that were
accrued (excluding dividend equivalents) for the outstanding
performance share awards held by each Named Executive Officer based
on the Company’s performance during 2022.
Name |
|
Performance
Share Award |
|
Target
Number of
Performance
Shares |
|
Fraction
of Each
Target Performance
Share Accrued
Based on 2022
Performance |
|
Total Number of
Shares Accrued
Based on 2022
Performance(1) |
|
Market Value of
Shares Accrued
Based on 2022
Performance(2)
($) |
Michael
F. Roman |
|
2022
PSA |
|
37,997 |
|
0.000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
2021
PSA |
|
29,761 |
|
0.068 |
|
2,027 |
|
243,037 |
|
|
2020
PSA |
|
32,676 |
|
0.014 |
|
471 |
|
56,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
299,470 |
Monish
Patolawala(3) |
|
2022
PSA |
|
19,310 |
|
0.000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
2021
PSA |
|
12,160 |
|
0.068 |
|
828 |
|
99,305 |
|
|
2020
PSA |
|
11,825 |
|
0.014 |
|
170 |
|
20,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
119,734 |
Peter
D. Gibbons(4) |
|
2022
PSA |
|
10,432 |
|
0.000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
— |
Jeffrey
R. Lavers |
|
2022
PSA |
|
9,327 |
|
0.000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
2021
PSA |
|
5,899 |
|