Clinical Study Shows Targeted End-tidal Control Anesthesia Delivery Improves Efficiency and Accuracy to Help Optimize Patient Care
August 20 2024 - 8:30AM
Business Wire
- Published in Anesthesia and Analgesia, results from the
multi-site trial evaluating End-tidal Control software provide
compelling evidence for enhanced accuracy and efficiency of
anesthesia delivery compared to conventional anesthetic gas
delivery methods.1
- End-tidal Control is the first FDA-approved software that
automatically adjusts and maintains exhaled oxygen and exhaled
anesthetic concentrations, with more accuracy in reaching the
clinician’s target versus manual control. The utilization of
End-tidal Control software reduces manual adjustments by
clinicians, enabling them to focus on time with their
patients.2
- Results support End-tidal Control’s ability to reduce
anesthetic agent usage, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and
costs, compared to manual control. 1
GE HealthCare (Nasdaq: GEHC) today announced the publication of
the MASTER trial results in the peer-reviewed journal Anesthesia
and Analgesia, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of End-tidal
Control software for inhaled anesthetic administration for surgical
patients.1* End-tidal Control software automatically achieves and
maintains clinician-set targets of end-tidal anesthetic agent and
oxygen concentrations. The results highlight End-tidal Control’s
performance in achieving and maintaining targeted agent and oxygen
concentrations during anesthesia delivery compared to conventional
manual control.
As healthcare systems continue to face workforce challenges,
sicker patients, and increasing costs and administrative demands,
the need for efficient care is critical. Automation in anesthesia
gas delivery can help reduce manual intervention and cognitive
burden for clinicians, while decreasing costs and optimizing
patient care.
To ease the way to more efficient care, automated anesthesia gas
delivery can also help support low-flow anesthesia —a technique in
which anesthetic gas flow is reduced to the lowest level consistent
with safe patient care. “In the dynamic surgical environment, the
repeated manual adjustment of fresh gas flows and anesthetic
vaporizer settings required to deliver low-flow anesthesia can be
challenging for anesthesia clinicians. Results from the MASTER
trial showed that End-Tidal Control software was able to achieve
and sustain desired oxygen and anesthetic agent concentrations more
consistently and timely compared to conventional methods,” said
Trial Investigator Melinda S. Seering, MD, Clinical Associate
Professor of Anesthesia at University of Iowa Healthcare. “As less
anesthetic agent is needed to maintain the respective targets,
End-tidal Control software can help enhance patient safety in the
operating room, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions and
costs.”**
The randomized, controlled MASTER trial (Multi-site
Anesthesia Randomized Controlled STudy of End
Tidal Control Compared to Conventional Anesthesia Results)
was conducted across four U.S.-based hospitals and analyzed data
from 210 adult patients (18 years of age and older) scheduled for
surgical procedures under general inhaled anesthesia. The study
assessed the safety and efficacy of End-tidal Control software
compared to conventional manual control in achieving and
maintaining provider-set targets for end-tidal anesthetic agent and
oxygen concentrations during patient care.
Study results showed that the End-tidal Control arm
achieved:***
- Targeted end-tidal anesthetic concentrations within 5%
of the set value 98 ± 2% of the time, compared to 46 ± 32% of the
time with manual control (p < 0.0001).
- Targeted end-tidal oxygen concentrations within 5% of
the set value 86 ± 23% of the time, compared to 41 ± 33% of the
time with manual control (p < 0.0001).
- Faster response times for achieving 90% of the initial
desired end-tidal anesthetic concentration (median 75 seconds),
compared to manual control (median 158 seconds) (p=0.0013).
Additionally, results support End-tidal Control’s ability to
significantly reduce anesthetic agent usage, reducing greenhouse
gas emissions and costs, compared to manual control.**** A separate
study also showed a potential 44% decline in the rate of greenhouse
emissions when employing End-tidal Control software.3
“Anesthesia professionals are focused on patient safety and have
a history of utilizing technology to deliver improved clinical
outcomes. End-tidal Control enables clinicians to automatically
manage adequate oxygen and anesthetic delivery. Clinicians no
longer have to continually adjust fresh gas flow and vaporizer
settings, freeing up their time to focus on other tasks,” said John
Beard, MD, anesthesiologist and Chief Medical Officer of Patient
Care Solutions, GE HealthCare. “Results from the MASTER trial
reinforce the value of End-tidal Control software in surgical
settings to potentially help reduce unnecessary variability in care
and meet the unique needs of individual patients.”
GE HealthCare designs anesthesia solutions to support care that
can think one step ahead. End-tidal Control software can be used
with the Aisys™ CS2 Anesthesia Delivery System to enhance
perioperative care. Additionally, the American Medical Association
recently approved a new Category III CPT code to help facilities
track patient outcomes associated with the use of End-tidal Control
software, in addition to its other benefits. For more information,
please visit:
https://www.gehealthcare.com/products/anesthesia-delivery/aisys-cs2
* End-tidal Control in the United States is indicated for
patients 18 years of age and older.
** The MASTER trial was funded by GE HealthCare. The views
expressed are solely those of Dr. Melinda S. Seering, do not
reflect the opinions or beliefs of the University of Iowa and are
based on upon her own opinions and on results that were achieved in
the trial. Since there is no “typical” hospital/clinical setting
and many variables exist, i.e. hospital size, case mix, staff
expertise, etc. there can be no guarantee that others will achieve
the same results.
*** Median percent deviation from the clinician’s desired
end-tidal anesthetic and oxygen targets with End-tidal Control was
1.68% and 1.63% respectively, whereas with the manual control,
deviations were 17.6% and 16% respectively (p<0.0001).
**** Studies have shown End-tidal Control can reduce anesthetic
agent consumption by over 25% depending on agent.
About GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
GE HealthCare is a leading global medical technology,
pharmaceutical diagnostics, and digital solutions innovator,
dedicated to providing integrated solutions, services, and data
analytics to make hospitals more efficient, clinicians more
effective, therapies more precise, and patients healthier and
happier. Serving patients and providers for more than 125 years, GE
HealthCare is advancing personalized, connected, and compassionate
care, while simplifying the patient’s journey across the care
pathway. Together our Imaging, Ultrasound, Patient Care Solutions,
and Pharmaceutical Diagnostics businesses help improve patient care
from diagnosis, to therapy, to monitoring. We are a $19.6 billion
business with approximately 51,000 colleagues working to create a
world where healthcare has no limits.
Follow us on LinkedIn, X , Facebook, Instagram, and Insights for
the latest news, or visit our website https://www.gehealthcare.com/
for more information.
1 McCabe, M., et al. End-Tidal Control Versus Manual Control of
Inhalational Anesthesia Delivery: A Randomized Controlled
Noninferiority Trial, Anesthesia & Analgesia 2024. 2 Lucangelo,
U., Garufi, G., Marras, E. et al. End-tidal versus
manually-controlled low-flow anaesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput 28,
117–121 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-013-9516-8. Also
refer to the Et Control User’s Reference Manual (5824844-USA). 3
Tay. S, et al. Financial and environmental costs of manual versus
automated control of end-tidal gas concentrations, Anaesthesia
Intensive Care 2013; 41: 95-105.
View source
version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240820714523/en/
GE HealthCare Media Contact: Jennifer Purdue M +1 267 593
9735 jennifer.purdue@gehealthcare.com
GE HealthCare Technologies (NASDAQ:GEHC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2024 to Oct 2024
GE HealthCare Technologies (NASDAQ:GEHC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2023 to Oct 2024