JPM-K JP Morgan Chase and Co

Observation Dates and Coupon Payment Dates

^†The Notes are not callable until the second Observation Date, February 6, 2023.

Each of the Observation Dates, and therefore the Coupon Payment Dates, is subject to postponement in the event of a market disruption event and as described under “General Terms of Notes — Postponement of a Determination Date — Notes Linked to Multiple Underlyings” and “General Terms of Notes — Postponement of a Payment Date” in the accompanying product supplement.

What Are the Tax Consequences of the Notes?

You should review carefully the section entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in the accompanying product supplement no. UBS-1-II. In determining our reporting responsibilities we intend to treat (i) the Notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes as prepaid forward contracts with associated contingent coupons and (ii) any Contingent Coupons as ordinary income, as described in the section entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences — Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders — Notes Treated as Prepaid Forward Contracts with Associated Contingent Coupons” in the accompanying product supplement. Based on the advice of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, our special tax counsel, we believe that this is a reasonable treatment, but that there are other reasonable treatments that the IRS or a court may adopt.

Sale, Exchange or Redemption of a Note. Assuming the treatment described above is respected, upon a sale or exchange of the Notes (including redemption upon an automatic call or at maturity), you should recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale or exchange and your tax basis in the Notes, which should equal the amount you paid to acquire the Notes (assuming Contingent Coupons are properly treated as ordinary income, consistent with the position referred to above). This gain or loss should be short-term capital gain or loss unless you hold the Notes for more than one year, in which case the gain or loss should be long-term capital gain or loss, whether or not you are an initial purchaser of the Notes at the issue price. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. If you sell your Notes between the time your right to a Contingent Coupon is fixed and the time it is paid, it is likely that you will be treated as receiving ordinary income equal to the Contingent Coupon. Although uncertain, it is possible that proceeds received from the sale or exchange of your Notes prior to an Observation Date but that can be attributed to an expected Contingent Coupon payment could be treated as ordinary income. You should consult your tax adviser regarding this issue.

As described above, there are other reasonable treatments that the IRS or a court may adopt, in which case the timing and character of any income or loss on the Notes could be materially affected. In addition, in 2007 Treasury and the IRS released a notice requesting comments on the U.S. federal income tax treatment of “prepaid forward contracts” and similar instruments. The notice focuses in particular on whether to require investors in these instruments to accrue income over the term of their investment. It also asks for comments on a number of related topics, including the character of income or loss with respect to these instruments and the relevance of factors such as the nature of the underlying property to which the instruments are linked. While the notice requests comments on appropriate transition rules and effective dates, any Treasury regulations or other guidance promulgated after consideration of these issues could materially affect the tax consequences of an investment in the Notes, possibly with retroactive effect. The discussions above and in the accompanying product supplement do not address the consequences to taxpayers subject to special tax accounting rules under Section 451(b) of the Code. You should consult your tax adviser regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the Notes, including possible alternative treatments and the issues presented by the notice described above.

Non-U.S. Holders — Tax Considerations. The U.S. federal income tax treatment of Contingent Coupons is uncertain, and although we believe it is reasonable to take a position that Contingent Coupons are not subject to U.S. withholding tax (at least if an applicable Form W-8 is provided), a withholding agent may nonetheless withhold on these payments (generally at a rate of 30%, subject to the possible reduction of that rate under an applicable income tax treaty), unless income from your Notes is effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States (and, if an applicable treaty so requires, attributable to a permanent establishment in the United States). If you are not a United States person, you are urged to consult your tax adviser regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the Notes in light of your particular circumstances.

Section 871(m) of the Code and Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder (“Section 871(m)”) generally impose a 30% withholding tax (unless an income tax treaty applies) on dividend equivalents paid or deemed paid to Non-U.S. Holders with respect to certain financial instruments linked to U.S. equities or indices that include U.S. equities. Section 871(m) provides certain exceptions to this withholding regime, including for instruments linked to certain broad-based indices that meet requirements set forth in the applicable Treasury regulations. Additionally, a recent IRS notice excludes from the scope of Section 871(m) instruments issued prior to January 1, 2023 that do not have a delta of one with respect to underlying securities that could pay U.S.-source dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes (each an “Underlying Security”). Based on certain determinations made by us, our special tax counsel is of the opinion that Section 871(m) should not apply to the Notes with regard to Non-U.S. Holders. Our determination is not binding on the IRS, and the IRS may disagree with this determination. Section 871(m) is complex and its application may depend on your particular circumstances, including whether you enter into other transactions with respect to an Underlying Security. You should consult your tax adviser regarding the potential application of Section 871(m) to the Notes.

In the event of any withholding on the Notes, we will not be required to pay any additional amounts with respect to amounts so withheld.

Key Risks

An investment in the Notes involves significant risks. Investing in the Notes is not equivalent to investing directly in either or both of the Underlyings. These risks are explained in more detail in the “Risk Factors” sections of the accompanying prospectus supplement, the accompanying product supplement and the accompanying underlying supplement. We also urge you to consult your investment, legal, tax, accounting and other advisers before you invest in the Notes.

Risks Relating to the Notes Generally

The lower the correlation between two Underlyings, the greater the potential for one of those Underlyings to close below its Coupon Barrier or Downside Threshold on an Observation Date or the Final Valuation Date, respectively. Although the correlation of the Underlyings’ performance may change over the term of the Notes, the Contingent Coupon Rate is determined, in part, based on the correlation of the Underlyings’ performance, as calculated using internal models of our affiliates at the time when the terms of the Notes are finalized. A higher Contingent Coupon Rate is generally associated with lower correlation of the Underlyings, which reflects a greater potential for missed Contingent Coupons and for a loss of principal at maturity. The correlation referenced in setting the terms of the Notes is calculated using internal models of our affiliates and is not derived from the returns of the Underlyings over the period set forth under “Correlation of the Underlyings” below. In addition, other factors and inputs other than correlation may impact how the terms of the Notes are set and the performance of the Notes. Furthermore, because the closing price of one share of each Underlying must be greater than or equal to its Initial Value on a quarterly Observation Date (after an initial six-month non-call period) in order for the notes to be automatically called prior to maturity, the Notes are less likely to be automatically called on any Observation Date than if the Notes were linked to a single Underlying.

held by the Underlyings and received the dividends on the Underlyings or those equity securities. This is because the calculation agent will determine whether the Notes will be called and whether a Contingent Coupon is payable and, if the Notes are not called, will calculate the amount payable to you at maturity of the Notes by reference to the closing price of one share of each Underlying on the relevant Observation Date, without taking into consideration the value of dividends on the Underlyings or the equity securities held by the Underlyings.

Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest

Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes

The Notes are not designed to be short-term trading instruments. Accordingly, you should be able and willing to hold your Notes to maturity. See “— Risks Relating to the Notes Generally — Lack of Liquidity” above.

Additionally, independent pricing vendors and/or third party broker-dealers may publish a price for the Notes, which may also be reflected on customer account statements. This price may be different (higher or lower) than the price of the Notes, if any, at which JPMS may be willing to purchase your Notes in the secondary market.

Risks Relating to the Underlyings

investment adviser, the implementation of which is subject to a number of constraints, may not produce the intended results. These constraints could adversely affect the market price of the shares of the Underlyings, and consequently, the value of the Notes.

During periods of market volatility, securities underlying each Underlying may be unavailable in the secondary market, market participants may be unable to calculate accurately the net asset value per share of that Underlying and the liquidity of that Underlying may be adversely affected. This kind of market volatility may also disrupt the ability of market participants to create and redeem shares of an Underlying. Further, market volatility may adversely affect, sometimes materially, the prices at which market participants are willing to buy and sell shares of an Underlying. As a result, under these circumstances, the market value of shares of an Underlying may vary substantially from the net asset value per share of that Underlying. For all of the foregoing reasons, the performance of each Underlying may not correlate with the performance of its Underlying Index as well as the net asset value per share of that Underlying, which could materially and adversely affect the value of the Notes in the secondary market and/or reduce any payment on the Notes.

Hypothetical Examples

Hypothetical terms only.  Actual terms may vary.  See the cover page for actual offering terms.

The examples below illustrate the hypothetical payments on a Coupon Payment Date, upon an automatic call or at maturity under different hypothetical scenarios for a $10.00 Note on an offering of the Notes, with the assumptions set forth below.* We cannot predict the closing price of one share of either Underlying on any day during the term of the Notes, including on any Observation Date. You should not take these examples as an indication or assurance of the expected performance of the Notes. Numbers in the examples below have been rounded for ease of analysis. In these examples, we refer to the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF and the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF as the “IVE Fund” and the “IWN Fund,” respectively.

The examples below are purely hypothetical. These examples are intended to illustrate (a) under what circumstances the Notes will be subject to an automatic call, (b) how the payment of a Contingent Coupon with respect to any Observation Date will depend on whether the closing price of one share of either Underlying on that Observation Date is less than its Coupon Barrier, (c) how the value of the payment at maturity on the Notes will depend on whether the Final Value of either Underlying is less than its Downside Threshold and (d) how the total return on the Notes may be less than the total return on a direct investment in either or both Underlyings in certain scenarios. The “total return” as used in this pricing supplement is the number, expressed as a percentage, that results from comparing the total payments per $10.00 principal amount Note over the term of the Notes to the $10.00 initial issue price.

Because the closing price of one share of each Underlying is greater than or equal to its Initial Value on the second Observation Date (which is approximately six months after the Trade Date and is the first Observation Date on which the Notes are callable), the Notes are automatically called on that Observation Date. JPMorgan Financial will pay you on the Call Settlement Date $10.2413 per $10.00 principal amount Note, which is equal to your principal amount plus the Contingent Coupon due on the Coupon Payment Date that is also the Call Settlement Date. No further amounts will be owed to you under the Notes.

In addition, because the closing price of one share of each Underlying was greater than or equal to its Coupon Barrier on the first Observation Date, JPMorgan Financial will pay the Contingent Coupon of $0.2413 on the first Coupon Payment Date. Accordingly, JPMorgan Financial will have paid a total of $10.4826 per $10.00 principal amount Note for a 4.826% total return over the shortened six (6) month term of the Notes as a result of the automatic call.

Because the closing price of one share of at least one Underlying was less than its Initial Value on each Observation Date on and after the second Observation Date (which is approximately six months after the Trade Date and is the first Observation Date on which the Notes are callable), the Notes are not automatically called. Because the Final Value of each Underlying is greater than or equal to its Downside Threshold, JPMorgan Financial will pay you on the Maturity Date $10.2413 per $10.00 principal amount Note, which is equal to your principal amount plus the Contingent Coupon due on the Coupon Payment Date that is also the Maturity Date.

In addition, because the closing price of one share of each Underlying was greater than or equal to its Coupon Barrier on the first and second Observation Dates, JPMorgan Financial will pay the Contingent Coupon of $0.2413 on the first and second Coupon Payment Dates. However, because the closing price of one share of at least one Underlying was less than its Coupon Barrier on the third through eleventh Observation Dates, JPMorgan Financial will not pay any Contingent Coupon on the Coupon Payment Dates following those Observation Dates. Accordingly, JPMorgan Financial will have paid a total of $10.7239 per $10.00 principal amount Note for a 7.239% total return over the approximately three (3) year term of the Notes.

Because the closing price of one share of at least one Underlying is less than its Initial Value on each Observation Date on and after the second Observation Date (which is approximately six months after the Trade Date and is the first Observation Date on which the Notes are callable), the Notes are not automatically called. Because the Final Value of at least one Underlying is less than its Downside Threshold on the Final Valuation Date, at maturity, JPMorgan Financial will pay you a total of $4.50 per $10.00 principal amount Note, for a -55.00% total return on the Notes, calculated as follows:

$10.00 × (1 + Lesser Performing Underlying Return)

Step 1: Determine the Underlying Return of each Underlying:

Underlying Return of the IVE Fund:

Underlying Return of the IWN Fund:

Step 2: Determine the Lesser Performing Underlying. The IVE Fund is the Underlying with the lower Underlying Return.

Step 3: Calculate the Payment at Maturity:

$10.00 × (1 + Lesser Performing Underlying Return) = $10.00 × (1 + -55.00%) = $4.50

In addition, because the closing price of one share of at least one Underlying is less than its Coupon Barrier on each Observation Date, JPMorgan Financial will not pay any Contingent Coupons over the term of the Notes. Accordingly, JPMorgan Financial will have paid a total of $4.50 per $10.00 principal amount Note for a -55.00% total return over the approximately three (3) year term of the Notes.

The hypothetical returns and hypothetical payments on the Notes shown above apply only if you hold the Notes for their entire term or until automatically called. These hypotheticals do not reflect fees or expenses that would be associated with any sale in the secondary market. If these fees and expenses were included, the hypothetical returns and hypothetical payments shown above would likely be lower.

The Underlyings

Included on the following pages is a brief description of the Underlyings. This information has been obtained from publicly available sources, without independent verification. Set forth below is a table that provides the quarterly high and low closing prices of one share of each Underlying. This information given below is for the four calendar quarters in each of 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 and the first and second calendar quarters of 2022. Partial data is provided for the third calendar quarter of 2022. We obtained the closing prices of one share information set forth below from the Bloomberg Professional^® service (“Bloomberg”), without independent verification. You should not take the historical values of either Underlying as an indication of future performance.

The iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF

The iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF is an exchange-traded fund of iShares^® Trust, a registered investment company, that seeks to track the investment results, before fees and expenses, of an index composed of large-capitalization U.S. equities that exhibit value characteristics, which we refer to as the Underlying Index with respect to the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF.  The Underlying Index for the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF is currently the S&P 500^® Value Index.  The S&P 500^® Value Index is a float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the full performance of companies included in the S&P 500^® Index that exhibit relatively strong value characteristics (determined by reference to (1) book-value-to-price ratio, (2) earnings-to-price ratio and (3) sales-to-price ratio) and relatively weak growth characteristics (determined by reference to earnings-per-share growth, sales-per-share growth and upward share price momentum) and a portion of the performance of companies with more balanced value and growth characteristics (where greater weight is allocated to companies with relatively stronger value characteristics and relatively weaker growth characteristics).  For additional information about the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF, see “Fund Descriptions — The iShares^® ETFs” in the accompanying underlying supplement.  For purposes of the accompanying underlying supplement, the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF is an “iShares^® ETF.”  For additional information about the S&P 500^® Value Index, see Annex A in this pricing supplement.

Historical Information Regarding the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF

The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low closing prices of one share of the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF, based on daily closing prices of one share of the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF as reported by Bloomberg, without independent verification. The closing price of one share of the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF on August 5, 2022 was $144.84. We obtained the closing prices of one share of the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF above and below from Bloomberg, without independent verification. The closing prices above and below may have been adjusted by Bloomberg for certain actions, such as stock splits. You should not take the historical prices of one share of the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF as an indication of future performance.

The graph below illustrates the daily performance of the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF from January 3, 2012 through August 5, 2022, based on information from Bloomberg, without independent verification. The dotted line represents the Downside Threshold and Coupon Barrier of $101.39, equal to 70% of the closing price of one share of the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF on August 5, 2022.

Past performance of the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF is not indicative of the future performance of the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF.

The iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF

The iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF is an exchange-traded fund of iShares^® Trust, a registered investment company, that seeks to track the investment results, before fees and expenses, of an index composed of small capitalization U.S. equities that exhibit value characteristics, which we refer to as the Underlying Index with respect to the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF. The Underlying Index for the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF is currently the Russell 2000^® Value Index. The Russell 2000^® Value Index measures the capitalization-weighted price performance of the stocks included in the Russell 2000^® Index that are determined by FTSE Russell to be value oriented, with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. For additional information about the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF, see “Fund Descriptions — The iShares^® ETFs” in the accompanying underlying supplement. For purposes of the accompanying underlying supplement, the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF is an “iShares^® ETF.” For additional information about the Russell 2000^® Value Index, see Annex B in this pricing supplement.

Historical Information Regarding the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF

The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low closing prices of one share of the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF, based on daily closing prices of one share of the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF as reported by Bloomberg, without independent verification. The closing price of one share of the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF on August 5, 2022 was $150.67. We obtained the closing prices of one share of the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF above and below from Bloomberg, without independent verification. The closing prices above and below may have been adjusted by Bloomberg for certain actions, such as stock splits. You should not take the historical prices of one share of the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF as an indication of future performance.

The graph below illustrates the daily performance of the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF from January 3, 2012 through August 5, 2022, based on information from Bloomberg, without independent verification. The dotted line represents the Downside Threshold and Coupon Barrier of $105.47, equal to 70% of the closing price of one share of the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF on August 5, 2022.

Past performance of the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF is not indicative of the future performance of the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF.

Correlation of the Underlyings

The graph below illustrates the daily performance of the iShares^® S&P 500 Value ETF and the iShares^® Russell 2000 Value ETF from January 3, 2012 through August 5, 2022. For comparison purposes, each Underlying has been normalized to have a closing price of one share of $100.00 on January 3, 2012 by dividing the closing price of one share of that Underlying on each day by the closing price of one share of that Underlying on January 3, 2012 and multiplying by 100.00. We obtained the closing prices used to determine the normalized closing prices set forth below from Bloomberg, without independent verification.

Past performance of the Underlyings is not indicative of the future performance of the Underlyings.

The correlation of a pair of Underlyings represents a statistical measurement of the degree to which the returns of those Underlyings were similar to each other over a given period in terms of timing and direction.  The correlation between a pair of Underlyings is scaled from 1.0 to -1.0, with 1.0 indicating perfect positive correlation (i.e., the value of both Underlyings are increasing together or decreasing together and the ratio of their returns has been constant), 0 indicating no correlation (i.e., there is no statistical relationship between the returns of that pair of Underlyings) and -1.0 indicating perfect negative correlation (i.e., as the value of one Underlying increases, the value of the other Underlying decreases and the ratio of their returns has been constant).

The closer the relationship of the returns of a pair of Underlyings over a given period, the more positively correlated those Underlyings are. The graph above illustrates the historical performance of each Underlying relative to each other over the time period shown and provides an indication of how close the relative performance of each Underlying has historically been to the other Underlying.

The lower (or more negative) the correlation between the Underlyings, the less likely it is that the Underlyings will move in the same direction and, therefore, the greater the potential for one of the Underlyings to close below its Coupon Barrier or Downside Threshold on any Observation Date or the Final Valuation Date, respectively.  This is because the less positively correlated the Underlyings are, the greater the likelihood that at least one of the Underlyings will decrease in value.  However, even if the Underlyings have a higher positive correlation, one or both of the Underlyings might close below its Coupon Barrier or Downside Threshold on any Observation Date or the Final Valuation Date, respectively, as both of the Underlyings may decrease in value together.

Although the correlation of the Underlyings’ performance may change over the term of the Notes, the Contingent Coupon Rate is determined, in part, based on the correlation of the Underlyings’ performance calculated using internal models of our affiliates at the time when the terms of the Notes are finalized.  A higher Contingent Coupon Rate is generally associated with lower correlation of the Underlyings, which reflects a greater potential for missed Contingent Coupons and for a loss of principal at maturity.  The correlation referenced in setting the terms of the Notes is calculated using internal models of our affiliates and is not derived from the returns of the Underlyings over the period set forth above.  In addition, other factors and inputs other than correlation may impact how the terms of the Notes are set and the performance of the Notes.