UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. ___)
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed
by a party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
| ☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
| ☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted
by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| ☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
| ☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
| ☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Precigen, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if
Other Than The Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
☒ |
No
fee required. |
|
|
|
|
☐ |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
|
☐ |
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
PRECIGEN, INC.
20374 Seneca Meadows Parkway
Germantown, Maryland 20876
NOTICE OF 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held On June 9, 2022
To Our Shareholders:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2022 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Precigen, Inc. (“Precigen,” “we,” “us,”
“our,” or the “Company”) to be held in virtual meeting format only at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time, Thursday, June 9,
2022, for the following purposes:
|
1. |
to elect the ten nominees named in the accompanying Proxy Statement to the Board of Directors, each to serve a one-year term expiring at the earlier of the next Annual Meeting or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified; |
|
2. |
to ratify the appointment by the Audit Committee of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022; |
|
|
|
|
3. |
to approve a non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation of the named executive officers; |
|
4. |
to approve an amendment to the Precigen, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock which may be subject to awards thereunder by 10 million; |
|
5. |
to approve an amendment to the Precigen, Inc. 2019 Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Service Providers to increase the number of shares of common stock which may be subject to awards thereunder by 7 million; and |
|
|
|
|
6. |
to transact any other business that may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. |
To join the meeting webcast, go to www.VirtualShareholderMeeting.com/PGEN2022
shortly before the meeting time and follow the instructions.
As of the date of this notice, we have not received
notice of any matters, other than those set forth above, that may properly be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are
properly presented for consideration at the meeting, the persons named as proxies on the proxy card, or their duly constituted substitutes,
will be deemed authorized to receive notice on behalf of and to vote the shares represented by proxy or otherwise act on those matters
in accordance with their business judgment.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of
business on April 12, 2022 as the record date for determining those shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.
As permitted by rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing our Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “2021 Annual Report”) over the internet to our shareholders. This means that
our shareholders will receive only a notice containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the internet. If you would
like to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, the notice contains instructions on how you can request copies of these documents.
Your vote is very important to us. Please
read the Proxy Statement and then, regardless of whether you are able to attend the Annual Meeting, vote your shares as promptly as possible.
Please note that in the
absence
of specific instructions as to how to vote, brokers may not vote your shares on the election of directors, the non-binding proposal to
approve the compensation of the named executive officers, the proposal to approve an amendment to the Precigen,
Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan or the proposal to approve an amendment to the Precigen, Inc. 2019 Incentive Plan
for Non-Employee Service Providers. You may revoke your proxy and change your vote by entering new instructions on either
the telephone or internet voting system before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 8, 2022, by submitting a proxy with a later date before
the polls close at the Annual Meeting, by delivering a written revocation to our Corporate Secretary such that it is received before
the polls close at the Annual Meeting, or by voting your shares at the Annual Meeting. Please note that voting in advance in any of the
ways described will not prevent you from attending the Annual Meeting should you choose to do so. Whether or not you attend the Annual
Meeting, please vote your shares as promptly as possible.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
DONALD P. LEHR
Corporate Secretary
Germantown, Maryland
April 29, 2022
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY
OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON June 9, 2022
Our Proxy Statement and our 2021 Annual Report are available online,
free of charge, at https://materials.proxyvote.com.
table
of contents
____________________
Page
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING |
1 |
Corporate Governance |
8 |
General |
8 |
Corporate Governance Guidelines |
8 |
Board Standards of Independence |
8 |
Board Meetings and Attendance at Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
9 |
Board Leadership Structure |
9 |
The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight |
11 |
Board Committees |
11 |
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics |
14 |
Communications with the Board |
15 |
Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock |
16 |
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports |
17 |
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
18 |
Background |
18 |
Vote Required and Board Recommendation |
18 |
Nominees for Election as Directors |
18 |
Director Compensation |
27 |
Non-Employee Director Compensation |
27 |
Director Compensation Table for 2021 |
28 |
Equity Ownership for Board of Directors |
29 |
PROPOSAL 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
29 |
Background |
29 |
Required Vote and Board Recommendation |
30 |
Principal Accountant Fees |
30 |
Pre-Approval Policy |
31 |
Audit Committee Report |
32 |
PROPOSAL 3 NON-BINDING PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
33 |
General |
33 |
Vote Required and Board Recommendation |
33 |
Identification of Executive Officers |
35 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
37 |
Executive Summary |
37 |
Key Compensation Corporate Governance Practices |
38 |
Our Compensation Philosophy |
39 |
Principles of Our Compensation Framework |
39 |
Developments in Executive Compensation for 2021 |
39 |
Elements of Our Compensation Program |
40 |
Employment Agreement with Dr. Sabzevari |
44 |
The Compensation Review Process |
44 |
Establishing Total Direct Remuneration |
46 |
Consideration of Say-on-Pay Vote Results |
46 |
Other Executive Compensation Practices |
47 |
Compensation and Human Capital Management Committee Report |
48 |
Compensation Risk Assessment |
48 |
Summary Compensation Table |
49 |
All Other Compensation Table for 2021 |
50 |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2021 |
51 |
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2021 Fiscal Year End |
52 |
Stock Awards Vested for 2021 |
53 |
Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control |
53 |
Equity Compensation Plan Information |
58 |
CEO Pay Ratio |
58 |
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions |
60 |
Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions |
61 |
PROPOSAL 4 APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE PRECIGEN, INC. AMENDED
AND RESTATED 2013 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN |
63 |
Overview |
63 |
Share Increase |
63 |
Text of the Amendment |
65 |
Summary of the Material Terms of the 2013 Plan |
65 |
Types of Awards |
66 |
Vote Required and Board Recommendation |
70 |
PROPOSAL 5 APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE
PRECIGEN, INC. 2019 INCENTIVE PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE SERVICE PROVIDERS |
71 |
Overview |
71 |
Share Increase |
71 |
Text of the Amendment |
72 |
Summary of the Material Terms of the 2019 Plan |
72 |
Types of Awards |
74 |
Vote Required and Board Recommendation |
77 |
CERTAIN MATTERS RELATING TO PROXY MATERIALS AND ANNUAL REPORTS |
78 |
Electronic Access of Proxy Materials and Annual Reports |
78 |
“Householding” of Proxy Materials and Annual Reports for Record Owners |
78 |
Separate Copies for Beneficial Owners |
78 |
OTHER MATTERS |
78 |
PRECIGEN, INC.
20374 Seneca Meadows Parkway
Germantown, Maryland 20876
PROXY STATEMENT
2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy
card are being furnished to you by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Precigen, Inc. to solicit your proxy to vote your
shares at our Annual Meeting, or at any adjournments or postponements thereof. The Annual Meeting will be held via an interactive webcast
and will be called to order at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time, on Thursday, June 9, 2022. To join the meeting webcast, go to www.VirtualShareholderMeeting.com/PGEN2022
at least fifteen minutes before the meeting time and follow the instructions. You will need the 16-digit control number on your proxy
card or voting instructions to join the meeting.
On or about April 29, 2022, we will commence mailing
a notice to shareholders containing instructions on how to access the Proxy Statement, including the accompanying notice and the 2021
Annual Report, and on how to vote. These materials are being made available to you on the internet at www.proxyvote.com, however, we will
promptly deliver printed versions of these materials to you by mail upon your request if submitted by May 26, 2022.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
|
1. |
Who is asking for my vote and why am I receiving this document? |
The Board asks that you vote on the matters listed
in the Notice of 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which are more fully described in this Proxy Statement. We are providing this Proxy
Statement and related proxy card to our shareholders in connection with the solicitation by the Board of proxies to be voted at the Annual
Meeting. A proxy, if duly executed and not revoked, will be voted and, if it contains any specific instructions, will be voted in accordance
with those instructions.
|
2. |
Who is entitled to vote? |
Only holders of record of outstanding shares of
our common stock at the close of business on April 12, 2022, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close
of business on April 12, 2022, there were 207,693,277 outstanding shares of common stock. Each share of common stock is entitled to one
vote on each matter properly brought before the Annual Meeting.
A proxy is your legal designation of another person
to vote the stock you own. If you designate someone as your proxy or proxy holder in a written document, that document is called a proxy
or a proxy card. Dr. Helen Sabzevari and Mr. Donald P. Lehr, or each of them, have been designated as proxies or proxy holders for the
Annual Meeting. A proxy properly executed and received by our Corporate Secretary by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 8, 2022 and not revoked
will be voted in accordance with the terms thereof.
|
4. |
What is a voting instruction? |
A voting instruction is the instruction form you
receive from your bank, broker, or its nominee if you hold your shares of common stock in street name. The instruction form instructs
you how to direct your bank, broker, or its nominee, as record holder, to vote your shares of common stock.
Shareholders are being asked to vote on each of
the following items of business:
|
· |
the election to the Board of the ten nominees named in this Proxy Statement, each to serve a one-year term expiring at the earlier of the next Annual Meeting or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified; |
|
· |
the ratification of the appointment by the Audit Committee of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022; |
|
· |
the approval of a non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation of the named executive officers; |
|
· |
the approval of an amendment to the Precigen, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) to increase the number of shares of common stock which may be subject to awards thereunder by 10 million; and
|
|
· |
the approval of an amendment to the Precigen, Inc. 2019 Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Service Providers (the “2019 Plan”) to increase the number of shares of common stock which may be subject to awards thereunder by 7 million. |
In addition, any other matters that properly come
before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof will be considered. The persons named in the enclosed proxy card
or voting instruction will vote the shares of common stock represented by the proxy in the manner as the Board may recommend, or otherwise
at the proxy holders’ discretion. Neither management nor the Board presently knows of any other such matters.
|
6. |
How many votes must be present to hold the Annual Meeting? |
A majority of the outstanding shares of common
stock entitled to be cast as of the record date must be present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. This is referred
to as a quorum. Abstentions and shares of record held by a broker or its nominee (“broker shares”) that are not voted on any
matter (“broker non-votes”) are included in determining the existence of a quorum.
|
7. |
What are the voting requirements to elect directors and approve the other proposals described in the Proxy Statement? |
The vote required to elect directors and approve
each of the matters scheduled for a vote at the annual meeting is set forth below:
Proposal |
Vote Required |
1. |
Election of directors |
Majority of votes cast |
2. |
Ratification of appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP |
Majority of votes cast |
3. |
Advisory vote on executive compensation |
Majority of votes cast |
4. |
Approval of an amendment to the 2013 Plan to increase the number of
shares of common stock which may be subject to awards thereunder by 10 million
|
Majority of votes cast |
5. |
Approval of an amendment to the 2019 Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock which may be subject to awards thereunder by 7 million |
Majority of votes cast |
Votes may be cast by proxy or in person. A “majority”
of votes cast means that more votes were cast “for” the proposal than “against.” Abstentions and broker non-votes
(described under “How are abstentions and broker non-votes counted?”) are not considered as votes cast and will have no effect
on the vote outcome for Proposals 1, 2,3, 4 and 5. As it relates to the election of our directors, our Corporate Governance Guidelines
provide that any nominee for director in an uncontested election who receives a greater number of shareholder votes cast “against”
his or her election than votes “for” his or her election must, promptly following certification of the shareholder vote, tender
his or her resignation to the Board for consideration. For more details regarding the director resignation policy, please see “Election
of Directors.”
|
8. |
What are the voting recommendations of the Board? |
For the reasons set forth in more detail later
in this Proxy Statement, the Board unanimously recommends that you vote:
|
· |
FOR the proposed nominees to the Board named in this Proxy Statement; |
|
· |
FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP; |
|
· |
FOR the approval of the non-binding advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers; |
|
· |
FOR the approval of an amendment to the 2013 Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock which may be subject to awards thereunder by 10 million; and
|
|
· |
FOR the approval of an amendment to the 2019 Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock which may be subject to awards thereunder by 7 million. |
Registered shareholders (shareholders who hold
common stock in certificated form or book entry form on the records of our transfer agent as opposed to through a bank, broker or other
nominee) may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy. There are three ways for registered shareholders to vote by proxy before
the Annual Meeting:
|
· |
By Internet: Connect to the internet at www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions included on the proxy card or voting instruction. Your proxy will be voted according to your instructions. If you vote by internet, you do not need to mail in a proxy card or voting instruction. |
|
· |
By Telephone: Call 1-800-690-6903 and follow the instructions included on the proxy card or voting instruction. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to mail in a proxy card or voting instruction. |
|
· |
By Mail: If you received your proxy materials by mail, complete, properly sign, date, and mail the enclosed proxy card. |
Registered shareholders are urged to deliver proxies
by using the internet, calling the toll-free telephone number, or by completing and mailing the proxy card. The internet and telephone
voting procedures are designed to authenticate shareholders’ identities, to allow shareholders to give their proxies, and to confirm
that such instructions have been recorded properly. Instructions for voting over the internet or by telephone are included on the enclosed
proxy card. If you received your proxy materials via mail, registered shareholders may send their proxies by completing, signing, and
dating the enclosed proxy card and returning it as promptly as possible in the enclosed prepaid envelope. The deadline for voting via
the internet or telephone is 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 8, 2022.
Shareholders who hold common stock through banks, brokers, or other
nominees (“street name shareholders”) who wish to vote at the Annual Meeting should receive voting instructions from the institution
that holds their shares. Please contact the institution that holds your shares if you have not received voting instructions. Street name
shareholders may also be eligible to vote their shares electronically by following the voting instructions provided by the bank, broker,
or other nominee that
holds the shares, using either the toll-free telephone number or the
internet address provided on the voting instruction; or by completing, dating, and signing the voting instruction and returning it promptly
in the enclosed prepaid envelope.
Shareholders can also vote via the internet during the virtual Annual
Meeting by visiting: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PGEN2022. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the record date,
April 12, 2022, are entitled to participate in and to vote at the virtual Annual Meeting. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will
need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or on your proxy card or on your
voting instruction form.
|
10. |
Can I attend the Annual Meeting? |
Yes. The Annual Meeting is open to all holders
of our common stock as of the record date, April 12, 2022. However, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to
vote your shares in advance. In light of the public health impact of COVID-19 and to support the health and well-being of our shareholders,
management and Board, the Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only. You can attend the Annual Meeting live via the
internet by visiting: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PGEN2022. Online check-in will begin at 8:45 a.m. Eastern Time. Please allow
ample time for the online check-in process. Please note that there is no in-person location for you to attend.
To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will
need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on your proxy card or any additional
voting instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.
|
11. |
How do I attend the virtual Annual Meeting? How can I ask questions during the Annual Meeting? What if I experience technical difficulties at log-in or during the Annual Meeting? |
Our virtual Annual Meeting will be conducted on
the internet via webcast. You will be able to participate online and submit your questions during the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PGEN2022.
Shareholders will be able to vote their shares electronically during the Annual Meeting. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will
need the 16-digit control number on your proxy card of voting instruction form. The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 am Eastern
Time.
Shareholders may submit questions during the Annual
Meeting. If you wish to submit a question, you may do so by logging into the virtual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PGEN2022,
typing your question into the “Ask a Question” field, and clicking “Submit”. Questions pertinent to the Annual
Meeting will be addressed during the Annual Meeting, subject to time constraints.
If you encounter any difficulties accessing the
virtual Annual Meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual
Annual Meeting login page for assistance. Technical assistance will be available through the conclusion of the Annual Meeting.
|
12. |
How will my shares be voted if I sign, date, and submit my proxy or voting instruction, but do not provide complete voting instructions with respect to each proposal? |
Shareholders should specify their vote for each
matter on the proxy or voting instruction. The proxies solicited by this Proxy Statement vest in the proxy holders voting rights with
respect to the election of directors (unless the shareholder marks the proxy to withhold that authority) and on all other matters voted
upon at the Annual Meeting.
Unless otherwise directed in the enclosed proxy
card, the persons named as proxies therein will vote all properly executed, returned, and not-revoked proxy cards or voting instruction
cards: (i) “FOR” the election of the ten director nominees listed thereon; (ii) “FOR” the proposal
to ratify the appointment by
the Audit
Committee of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022;
(iii) “FOR” the non-binding proposal to approve the compensation of our named executive officers; (iv) “FOR”
the approval of the amendment to the Precigen, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) to
increase the number of shares of common stock which may be subject to awards thereunder by 10 million; and (v) “FOR”
the approval of the amendment to the Precigen, Inc. 2019 Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Service Providers (the“2019 Plan”)
to increase the number of shares of common stock which may be subject to awards thereunder by 7 million.
|
13. |
How will my shares be voted if I do not return my proxy or my voting instruction? |
It will depend on how your ownership of shares
of common stock is registered. If you own your shares as a record holder, which means that your shares of common stock are registered
in your name, if you do not vote in advance of the Annual Meeting by submitting a proxy, your unvoted shares will not be represented at
the Annual Meeting and will not count toward the quorum requirement, as explained under “How many votes must be present to hold
the Annual Meeting?,” unless you attend the Annual Meeting to vote them in person.
If you are a street name shareholder and your
shares are registered in the name of your bank, broker or its nominee, your shares may be voted even if you do not provide your bank,
broker, or other nominee with voting instructions. Your bank, broker, or other nominee may vote your shares in its discretion on “routine”
matters. However, your bank, broker, or other nominee may not vote your shares on proposals that are not considered routine. When a proposal
is not a routine matter and your bank, broker, or other nominee has not received your voting instructions with respect to such proposal,
your bank, broker, or other nominee cannot vote your shares on that proposal. When a bank, broker, or other nominee does not cast a vote
for a routine or a non-routine matter, it is called a “broker non-vote.”
Therefore, please note that in the absence of
your specific instructions as to how to vote, your bank, broker, or other nominee may not vote your shares with respect to the election
of directors, the non-binding proposal to approve the compensation of the named executive officers, the proposal to approve an amendment
to the Precigen, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan or the proposal to approve
an amendment to the Precigen, Inc. 2019 Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Service Providers. These matters are not considered
routine matters. However, the ratification of the appointment by the Audit Committee of Deloitte & Touche LLP is a routine matter
for which brokerage firms may vote on behalf of their clients if no voting instructions are provided. Therefore, if you are a street name
shareholder whose shares of common stock are held with a bank, broker, or other nominee and you do not return your voting instructions,
your bank, broker, or other nominee may vote your shares on the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm. Please return your proxy so your vote can be counted.
|
14. |
How are abstentions and broker non-votes counted? |
Only votes cast “for” or “against”
are included in determining the votes cast with respect to any matter presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. As described
above, when brokers do not have discretion to vote or do not exercise such discretion, the inability or failure to vote is referred to
as a “broker non-vote.” Proxies marked as abstaining, and any proxies returned by brokers as “non-votes” on behalf
of shares held in street name because beneficial owners’ did not vote on one or more matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting,
will be treated as present for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. Broker non-votes and abstentions
will not be included in the vote total for the proposal to elect the nominees for director and will not affect the outcome of the vote
for the proposal. In addition, under Virginia corporate law, abstentions are not counted as votes cast on a proposal. Therefore, abstentions
and broker non-votes will not count either in favor of or against (i) the election of directors, (ii) the ratification of the appointment
of Deloitte & Touche LLP, (iii) the non-binding proposal to approve the compensation of the named executive officers, (iv) the approval
of the amendment to the Precigen, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) to increase the
number of shares of common stock which may be subject to awards thereunder by 10 million and (v) the
approval
of the amendment to the Precigen, Inc. 2019 Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Service Providers (the “2019 Plan”) to increase
the number of shares of common stock which may be subject to awards thereunder by 7 million.
|
15. |
What if I change my mind after I vote? |
Whether you vote by internet, telephone, or by
mail, you may later revoke your proxy and change your vote before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 8, 2022 by:
|
· |
entering new instructions on either the telephone or internet voting system before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 8, 2022; |
|
· |
delivering a properly signed proxy with a later date than the previously submitted proxy card before the polls close at the Annual Meeting; |
|
· |
delivering a written revocation to our Corporate Secretary at 20374 Seneca Meadows Parkway, Germantown, Maryland 20876; or |
|
· |
voting virtually at the Annual Meeting. |
Attendance at the virtual Annual Meeting alone
without voting will not revoke a previously granted proxy. If you are a street name shareholder whose stock is held with a bank, broker,
or other nominee, you must follow the instructions found on the voting instruction card provided by the bank, broker, or other nominee,
or contact your bank, broker, or other nominee to change or revoke your previously given proxy.
|
16. |
Who pays the cost of proxy solicitation? |
We will pay all expenses of soliciting proxies,
including clerical work, printing, and postage. Our officers and other employees may personally solicit proxies or solicit proxies by
internet, telephone, mail, or facsimile, but we will not provide any compensation for such solicitations. We will also reimburse banks,
brokers, and other persons holding shares in their names or in the names of nominees for expenses incurred sending material to beneficial
owners and obtaining proxies from beneficial owners.
|
17. |
Could other matters be decided in the Annual Meeting? |
The Board does not know of any other business
that may be brought before the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting or at any
adjournment or postponement thereof, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on such matters as they,
in their discretion, may determine.
|
18. |
How do I make a shareholder proposal for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders? |
Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we must receive any proposals from shareholders intended for inclusion in the
proxy statement for our 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders no later than 120 days before the anniversary date of the distribution of
this Proxy Statement (i.e., December 30, 2022). Holders of common stock who wish to have proposals submitted for inclusion in the proxy
statement for our 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders should consult the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC with respect to such
proposals, including certain information required to be in the proposal, the permissible number and length of proposals, and other matters
governed by such rules and regulations.
The Bylaws also set forth the procedures a shareholder
must follow to nominate directors or to bring other business before shareholder meetings. For a shareholder to nominate a candidate for
director or bring other matters from the floor at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we must receive notice of the nomination no
earlier than the close of business on February 9, 2023 and no later than the close of business on March 11, 2023, provided, however, that
if our 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is scheduled to be
held before
May 10, 2023 or after August 18, 2023, notice shall be delivered not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior
to such meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the
10th day following the day we announce the new meeting date. For the nomination of a candidate for director, the notice must
describe various matters as set forth in our Bylaws, including regarding the nominee, including name, address, occupation, and shares
held. For bringing other matters from the floor at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the notice must include a description of
the proposed business, the reasons therefor, and other matters specified in our Bylaws. In each case, the notice must be timely given
in writing to our Corporate Secretary, whose address is 20374 Seneca Meadows Parkway, Germantown, Maryland 20876.
Corporate
Governance
General
Our business and affairs are managed under the
direction of the Board in accordance with the Virginia Stock Corporation Act, our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, and
our Bylaws. Our Bylaws provide that the number of directors shall be fixed from time to time by the Board, but shall not be more than
ten. The Board is currently comprised of the following ten individuals: Randal Kirk, the Executive Chairman of the Board, Cesar Alvarez,
Steven Frank, Vinita Gupta, Fred Hassan, Jeffrey Kindler, Dean Mitchell, Dr. Helen Sabzevari, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”),
Robert Shapiro, and James Turley. Each of our current directors is being nominated for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting. For
more information regarding the nominees for election to the Board, see “Nominees for Election as Directors.”
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board has adopted corporate governance guidelines
(the “Corporate Governance Guidelines”) that set forth the practices of the Board with respect to the qualification, selection
and election of directors, director orientation and continuing education, director responsibilities, Board composition and performance,
director access to management and independent advisors, director compensation guidelines, management evaluation and succession, policies
regarding the Lead Independent Director, meetings of the non-management directors, the policy on communicating with the non-management
directors, and various other issues. A copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines is available on our website at http://investors.precigen.com
under the caption “Governance.” Neither the Corporate Governance Guidelines, our website nor any documents or information
contained therein are incorporated by reference to this proxy statement.
Board Standards of Independence
The Board has set forth our independence standards
in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. These standards provide that a majority of the Board must be independent under the independence
standards established by the Corporate Governance Guidelines and The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) as in effect from time
to time. For a Board member or candidate for election to the Board to qualify as independent, the Board must determine that the person
and his or her family members do not have a material relationship with us (either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of
an organization that has a relationship with us) or any of our affiliates. Under the categorical standards adopted by the Board, a member
of the Board is not independent if:
|
· |
The director is, or has been within the last three years, our employee, or whose family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of the Company; |
|
· |
The director has received, or has a family member serving as an executive officer who has received, during any 12-month period within the three years preceding the determination of independence, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from us, other than director and committee fees, compensation made to a family member who is an employee (other than an executive officer) of the Company, and benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan or non-discretionary compensation; |
|
· |
(i) The director is a current partner of a firm that is our internal or external auditor; (ii) the director has a family member who is a current partner of such a firm; or (iii) the director, or a family member, was within the last three years a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on our audit within that time; |
|
· |
The director or a family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of our present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee; or |
|
· |
The director is or a family member is, a partner in (excluding limited partners), or a controlling shareholder or executive officer of, any organization to which we made, or from which we received, payments for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $200,000, or 5%, of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues. |
With the exception of Mr. Kirk, our Executive
Chairman of the Board, and Dr. Sabzevari, our CEO, the Board has affirmatively determined that each of Cesar Alvarez, Steven Frank, Vinita
Gupta, Fred Hassan, Jeffrey Kindler, Dean Mitchell, Robert Shapiro, and James Turley is independent in accordance with the above standards
and applicable Nasdaq guidelines.
In determining that Mr. Alvarez is independent,
the Board considered that Mr. Alvarez is the Senior Chairman of Greenberg Traurig, LLP (“Greenberg Traurig”). As discussed
under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions,” Greenberg Traurig provides legal services to us from time to
time for which it has received, and may continue to receive, customary fees. During 2021, we paid Greenberg Traurig $9,767 for legal services,
constituting less than 5% of Greenberg Traurig’s annual gross revenues. As the Senior Chairman, Mr. Alvarez does not participate
in the provision of such services and does not materially benefit from the engagement, and his compensation from Greenberg Traurig is
not based on such services provided to us. The Board has determined that this relationship is not material and that it does not impair
Mr. Alvarez’s independence.
In determining that Mr. Turley is independent,
the Board considered that Mr. Turley is the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ernst & Young LLP. From time to time, Ernst
&Young provides strategy consulting, valuation and technical accounting services to us, for which it receives customary fees. As Mr.
Turley retired from Ernst & Young over eight years ago in June 2013, Mr. Turley does not participate in such services and does not
materially benefit from the engagement. The Board has determined that this relationship is not material and that it does not impair Mr.
Turley’s independence.
Board Meetings and Attendance at Annual Meeting of Shareholders
There were 5 meetings of the Board held either
in person or by teleconference in 2021. Each director attended at least 80% of the combined meetings of the Board and the committees on
which he or she served during the year scheduled during the time each member was a director, including all regularly scheduled meetings.
Our independent directors meet in executive session without management at least quarterly.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that
all directors are strongly encouraged to attend all annual and special meetings of our shareholders. All members of the Board at the time
of the 2021 Annual Meeting attended the 2021 Annual Meeting.
Board Leadership Structure
As specified in the Corporate Governance Guidelines,
the Board does not have a policy on whether the role of the CEO and Executive Chairman should be separate or, if it is to be separate,
whether the Chairman should be selected from the non-employee directors or be an employee. Currently, the roles are separate. Mr. Kirk
currently serves as Executive Chairman and Dr. Sabzevari serves as CEO. Prior to Dr. Sabzevari assuming the role of CEO in January 2020
and Mr. Kirk becoming Executive Chairman, Mr. Kirk had served as Chairman of the Board since February 2008 and CEO since April 2009. We
believe that separating the Executive Chairman and CEO roles at this time allows us to efficiently develop and implement corporate strategy
consistent with the Board’s oversight role while also facilitating strong day-to-day executive leadership.
The Board believes that Mr. Kirk is well situated
to serve as Executive Chairman because his unique and extensive experience and deep understanding of our business as well as his broad
business experience as CEO of, and significant investor in, multiple successful biotech companies enable him to deliver strategic insight
on key issues, to serve as a valuable bridge between the Board and management, and to
provide
valuable leadership experience. Mr. Kirk’s Executive Chairman responsibilities include the following:
|
· |
advising and supporting the CEO on governance matters; |
|
· |
serving as a liaison between the Board and senior management; |
|
· |
acting as a source of institutional knowledge; |
|
· |
together with the Lead Independent Director, and with input from the non-management and independent Board members, preparing the Board’s agenda; |
|
· |
chairing and guiding discussion at Board meetings; and |
|
· |
performing such other duties and responsibilities as may be delegated to the Executive Chairman by the Board from time to time. |
The Board established the position of Lead Independent
Director in the Corporate Governance Guidelines to serve as a principal liaison between the independent directors and the Executive Chairman
and the CEO as well as to coordinate the activities of the other independent directors. Mr. Shapiro currently serves as our Lead Independent
Director. In his role as Lead Independent Director, Mr. Shapiro is in frequent contact with the Executive Chairman and the CEO and is
regularly consulted on material matters. We currently maintain a significant majority of independent directors (Mr. Kirk and Dr. Sabzevari
are the only non-independent directors). The Lead Independent Director is elected by the independent directors and ensures that the Board
operates independently of management, and that directors and shareholders have an independent leadership contact.
The responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director
of the Board include the following:
|
· |
presiding over meetings of the non-management and independent Board members and, as appropriate, provide prompt feedback to the CEO and Executive Chairman; |
|
· |
together with the Executive Chairman, and with input from the non-management and independent Board members, preparing the Board’s agenda; |
|
· |
serving as a point of contact between non-management and independent Board members and the CEO on board-wide matters; |
|
· |
calling executive sessions of the Board or of the non-management and independent Board members; |
|
· |
serving as a “sounding board” and mentor to the CEO; |
|
· |
taking the lead in assuring that the Board carries out its responsibilities in circumstances where the Executive Chairman is incapacitated or otherwise unable to act; |
|
· |
consulting with the Chairman of the Compensation and Human Capital Management Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) to provide performance feedback and compensation information to the CEO and the Executive Chairman; and |
|
· |
performing such other duties and responsibilities as may be delegated to the Lead Independent Director by the Board from time to time. |
As part of the Board’s annual assessment
process, the Board evaluates the Board’s leadership structure to ensure that it remains appropriate. The Board recognizes that there
may be circumstances in the future that would lead it to combine the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board or to have an independent
Chairman,
but believes that the absence of a policy requiring either the separation or combination of these roles provides the Board with the flexibility
to determine the best leadership structure.
The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
The Board is responsible for our risk oversight,
and each committee of the Board is responsible for risk oversight within such committee’s area of responsibility and regularly reports
to the Board regarding the same. Management is responsible for our risk management, including providing working to ensure our policies
are carried out and processes are executed in accordance with our performance goals and risk tolerance. On a regular basis, our management
team identifies, discusses, and assesses financial risk from current macroeconomic, industry, and company perspectives. Our management
team also provides regular reports to the Board and its committees on areas of our material risk, including operational, financial, legal,
and regulatory as well as strategic and reputational risks.
The Audit Committee is responsible for discussing
with management our major financial risk exposures and the steps and processes management has taken to monitor and control such exposures,
including our risk assessment and risk management policies. As part of its regular reporting process, management reports and reviews with
the Audit Committee our material risks, including, but not limited to, proposed risk factors and other public disclosures, mitigation
strategies, and our internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee also engages in regular periodic discussions with
the Chief Financial Officer and other members of management regarding risks, as appropriate.
In carrying out its responsibilities, the Compensation
Committee considers the impact of executive and employee compensation on our risk profile, as well as overseeing the development, implementation
and effectiveness of our human capital management policies, programs and initiatives, including with respect to recruitment, retention
and development of our employees. The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities also include the consideration of succession planning
for our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers.
The Nominating and Governance Committee’s
responsibilities include the consideration of corporate governance matters and risks. The Nominating and Governance Committee also oversees
the Company’s environmental, social and governance, or ESG matters. The Nominating and Governance Committee’s duties include
considering with management public policy issues that may affect the Company, including pertinent ESG matters.
Each committee regularly reports to the Board.
Moreover, the Board reviews and oversees our various financial policies, financing programs, capital and operating plans, benefit plan
management, ESG matters and certain risk management policies. We believe the current leadership structure of the Board supports the risk
oversight functions described above by providing independent leadership at each of the committee levels, with ultimate oversight by the
full Board, as led by the Executive Chairman and the Lead Independent Director.
Board Committees
The Board maintains three standing committees:
the Audit Committee; the Compensation Committee; and the Nominating and Governance Committee. Each of these committees has a separate
chairperson and is composed entirely of directors that meet the applicable independence requirements of the SEC and Nasdaq. Each committee
operates under a written charter that is reviewed periodically and, has been approved, by the Board. A current copy of each committee’s
charter is available on our website at http://investors.precigen.com under the caption “Governance.” In addition, from time
to time, the Board may create ad hoc committees for specific purposes.
Audit Committee
The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs.
Kindler, Mitchell, and Shapiro. Mr. Kindler is the chair of the Audit Committee. During 2021, the Audit Committee met 9 times. The Board
has determined
that each
member of the Audit Committee is “independent” within the meaning of the enhanced independence standards for audit committee
members in the Exchange Act, and the rules thereunder, as incorporated into the listing standards of Nasdaq, and the independence standards
of our Corporate Governance Guidelines as discussed above under “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Board Standards of Independence.”
The Board has further determined that Mr. Kindler qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of
SEC regulations and is “financially sophisticated” within the meaning of the Nasdaq rules. The Audit Committee assists the
Board in its oversight of our accounting and financial reporting process and the audits of our consolidated financial statements. The
Audit Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things, overseeing:
|
· |
our accounting and financial reporting processes; |
|
· |
the integrity of our consolidated financial statements; |
|
· |
our compliance with laws and regulations; |
|
· |
our independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence; and |
|
· |
the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm. |
The Audit Committee appoints, compensates, oversees,
and evaluates the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm for each fiscal year and approves the audit and non-audit
fees we pay to such firm. The Audit Committee also reviews the scope and the results of the work of the independent registered public
accounting firm and reviews the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting. The functions and responsibilities of the Audit
Committee are further described in the “Audit Committee Report.”
Compensation Committee
The members of the Compensation Committee are
Messrs. Hassan, Kindler, and Turley. Mr. Turley is the chair of the Compensation Committee. During 2021, the Compensation Committee met
7 times. The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include, among others:
|
· |
developing and maintaining an executive compensation policy and monitoring the results of that policy; |
|
· |
considering the impact of our compensation policy and practices on our risk profile; |
|
· |
recommending to the Board for approval compensation and benefit plans; |
|
· |
reviewing and approving annually corporate and personal goals and objectives to serve as the basis for the CEO’s compensation, evaluating the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives and determining the CEO’s compensation based on that evaluation; |
|
· |
determining and approving annual compensation for other executive officers; |
|
· |
approving grants of equity-based incentives to the extent provided under the our equity compensation plans, subject to the Committee’s authority to delegate the power to grant awards to employees or non-executive service providers who are not directors or executive officers; |
|
· |
reviewing and making recommendations to the Board regarding the compensation of non-employee directors, including the Executive Chairman; |
|
· |
reviewing and discussing with management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” to the extent required by SEC rules; |
|
· |
preparing the Compensation Committee report when required by SEC rules; |
|
· |
reviewing any executive employment-related agreements, proposed severance or retirement arrangements, or change and control or similar agreements, and any amendments or waivers to any such agreements; |
|
· |
overseeing the development, implementation and effectiveness of the Company’s human capital management policies, programs and initiatives, including with respect to recruiting, retaining and developing our employees; |
|
· |
overseeing the succession planning process with respect
to the Chief Executive Officer and other key executive offiers; and
|
| · | reviewing and recommending to the Board for approval our
approach with respect to the advisory vote on executive compensation, or say-on-pay, and the frequency of the say-on-pay advisory vote. |
The Compensation Committee charter specifies that
each member must be a “non-employee director” for purposes of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act. In addition, the current members
of this Committee have been members of other public company boards of directors, are current or former executive officers of public companies,
or have or have had comparable positions. The Board has determined that the members of this Committee are “non-employee directors”
(within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act) and “independent directors” (as defined under the applicable Nasdaq
listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines as discussed above under “Corporate Governance — Board Standards
of Independence”).
The processes and procedures followed by the Compensation
Committee in considering and determining executive compensation, including the role of the outside compensation consultant, are described
below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — The Compensation Review Process.”
Nominating and Governance Committee
The members of the Nominating and Governance Committee
are Mr. Alvarez, Ms. Gupta, and Mr. Shapiro. Mr. Alvarez is the chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee. During 2021, the Nominating
and Governance Committee met 3 times. The Nominating and Governance Committee’s responsibilities include, among others:
|
· |
considering and reviewing periodically the desired composition of the Board, including such factors as diversity of backgrounds and expertise and tenure, and ensuring that the Board is composed so as to satisfy SEC listing requirements and Nasdaq rules, including the independence of directors and the financial and accounting experience of directors; |
|
· |
establishing and reviewing qualifications and standards for individual directors in the context of the current composition of the Board, the Company’s operating requirements, and the long-term interests of our shareholders, and periodically reviewing these qualifications and standards; |
|
· |
identifying, nominating, and evaluating candidates for election to the Board; |
|
· |
making recommendations to the Board regarding the size of the Board, the tenure and classifications of directors, and the composition of the Board’s committees; |
|
· |
reviewing and evaluating our various governance policies and guidelines, including pertinent ESG matters; |
|
· |
reviewing committee structure and effectiveness; and |
|
· |
considering other corporate governance and related matters as requested by the Board. |
The Board has determined that all members of the
Nominating and Governance Committee are “independent” within the meaning of the listing standards of Nasdaq and the independence
standards set by the Board as discussed above in “Corporate Governance — Board Standards of Independence.”
Director Candidate Recommendations by Shareholders
The Nominating and Governance Committee’s
charter provides that the Committee will consider director candidate recommendations by shareholders. Shareholder recommendations for
candidates to be nominees will be evaluated under the same standards as potential nominees recommended by management or the non-management
members of the Board. Shareholders should submit any such director recommendations to the Nominating and Governance Committee through
the method described in our Bylaws. The Nominating and Governance Committee did not receive any recommendations from any shareholders
in connection with the 2022 Annual Meeting.
Nominating and Governance Committee Process for Identifying
and Evaluating Director Candidates
The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies
and evaluates all director candidates in accordance with the director qualification standards described in the Corporate Governance Guidelines.
The Committee evaluates a candidate’s qualifications to serve as a member of the Board based on the background, diversity, and expertise
in relevant industries of individual Board members as well as the background and expertise of the Board as a whole. Nominees will be required
to bring the skills, talents, knowledge, and expertise to ensure that the composition, structure, and operation of the Board serve the
best interests of our shareholders. In addition, the Committee will evaluate a candidate’s independence and his or her background
and expertise in the context of the Board’s needs.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Nominating
and Governance Committee charter provides that we will consider diversity, including diversity of backgrounds, in considering the composition
of and evaluating nominees to the Board. Both our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Nominating and Governance Committee charter
specifically provide that diversity includes diversity of viewpoints, experience, race, ethnicity, gender and age.
Racial or ethnic minorities and women currently
comprise 40% of our directors nominees, based on director self-identification. Specifically, women comprise 20% of our director nominees
and racial and ethnic minorities comprise 40% of our director nominees. However, we have no formal requirement regarding Board diversity.
Our priority in selection of Board members is identification of members who will further the interests of our shareholders through their
established records of professional accomplishment, the ability to contribute positively to the collaborative culture among Board members,
knowledge of our business, and understanding of the competitive landscape of the industries in which we operate. We will consider, in
identifying first-time candidates, assessing nominees for director (including incumbent directors), or evaluating individuals recommended
by shareholders, the current composition of the Board in light of the diverse communities and geographies we serve and the interplay of
the candidate’s or nominee’s diverse individual experience, education, skills, background, and other qualities and attributes
with those of the other Board members. The Nominating and Governance Committee and Board monitor the Board’s effectiveness through
the Board’s self-evaluation process. As described under “Nominees for Election as Directors,” the Nominating and Governance
Committee and the Board believe that the current composition of the Board reflects a group of highly talented individuals with diverse
backgrounds, skills, professional, and industry experience, and other personal qualities and attributes best suited to perform oversight
responsibilities for us and our shareholders.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a written code of business conduct
and ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to our directors, officers, and employees, including our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer,
principal
accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions. The Code of Conduct covers a broad range of professional
conduct, including employment policies, conflicts of interest, intellectual property, and the protection of confidential information,
as well as adherence to all laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of our business.
A copy of the Code of Conduct is available on
our website at http://investors.precigen.com under the caption “Governance.” If we make any substantive amendments to, or
grant any waivers from, the Code of Conduct for any officer or director, we intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05
of Form 8-K by disclosing the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website.
Political Contributions
In general, it is not our practice to make financial
or in-kind political contributions with corporate assets, even when permitted by applicable law.
Communications with the Board
We have established a policy pursuant to which
shareholders wishing to communicate with the Board as a group, the Lead Independent Director or individual directors may do so by writing
to the following address: Precigen, Inc., 20374 Seneca Meadows Parkway, Germantown, Maryland 20876; Attn: Corporate Secretary.
The communication must prominently display the
legend “BOARD COMMUNICATION” in order to indicate to the Corporate Secretary that it is a communication for the Board. Upon
receiving such a communication, the Corporate Secretary will promptly forward the communication to the relevant individual or group to
which it is addressed. The Board has requested that certain items that are unrelated to the Board’s duties and responsibilities
be excluded, such as spam, junk mail and mass mailings, resumes, and other forms of job inquiries, surveys, and business solicitations
or advertisements.
The Corporate Secretary will not forward any communication
determined in his or her good faith belief to be frivolous, unduly hostile, threatening, illegal, or similarly unsuitable. Each communication
subject to this policy that was not forwarded because it was determined by the Corporate Secretary to be frivolous is retained for a reasonable
period of time in our files and made available at the request of any member of the Board to whom such communication was addressed.
Beneficial
Ownership of Common Stock
The following table sets forth information regarding
beneficial ownership of our share capital as of March 31, 2022 by (i) each of our directors, (ii) each of our named executive officers,
(iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group, and (iv) each person, or group of affiliated persons, known by us to beneficially
own more than 5% of our shares of common stock.
The percentage ownership information is based
on an aggregate 207,693,277 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2022.
Except as otherwise noted below, the address for
each person or entity listed in the table is c/o Precigen, Inc., 20374 Seneca Meadows Parkway, Germantown, Maryland 20876.
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Outstanding Shares
Beneficially Owned (1) |
|
Right to Acquire
Beneficial Ownership (2) |
|
Total Shares
Beneficially Owned |
|
Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned |
Directors/director nominees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RJ Kirk and Affiliates (3) |
|
|
83,465,566 |
|
|
|
285,248 |
|
|
|
83,750,814 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
% |
Cesar L. Alvarez |
|
|
304,396 |
|
|
|
322,521 |
|
|
|
626,917 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Steven Frank |
|
|
378,047 |
|
|
|
322,521 |
|
|
|
700,568 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Vinita Gupta (4) |
|
|
194,864 |
|
|
|
313,316 |
|
|
|
508,180 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Fred Hassan |
|
|
198,731 |
|
|
|
328,536 |
|
|
|
527,267 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jeffrey B. Kindler |
|
|
264,411 |
|
|
|
322,520 |
|
|
|
586,931 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Dean J. Mitchell |
|
|
221,970 |
|
|
|
322,521 |
|
|
|
544,491 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Robert B. Shapiro (5) |
|
|
324,123 |
|
|
|
322,520 |
|
|
|
646,643 |
|
|
|
* |
|
James Turley |
|
|
206,904 |
|
|
|
361,122 |
|
|
|
568,026 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named executive officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Helen Sabzevari |
|
|
734,150 |
|
|
|
2,990,959 |
|
|
|
3,725,109 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Harry Thomasian Jr. |
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
|
8,109 |
|
|
|
34,609 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Donald P. Lehr |
|
|
304,880 |
|
|
|
469,445 |
|
|
|
774,325 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jeffrey Perez |
|
|
316,462 |
|
|
|
459,551 |
|
|
|
776,013 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Rick Sterling (8) |
|
|
340,020 |
|
|
|
429,472 |
|
|
|
769,492 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Brad Osborne (8) |
|
|
60,380 |
|
|
|
132,936 |
|
|
|
193,316 |
|
|
|
* |
|
James V. Lambert (8) |
|
|
12,356 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
23,356 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Current executive officers and directors as a group (6) |
|
|
86,941,004 |
|
|
|
6,828,889 |
|
|
|
93,769,893 |
|
|
|
43.7 |
% |
Greater than 5% shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ares Trading SA (7) |
|
|
20,647,152 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9.9 |
% |
____________________
|
* |
Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1% of our outstanding shares of common stock. |
|
(1) |
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and includes sole or shared voting or investment power with respect to shares of our common stock. The information set forth in the table above is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose, and the inclusion of any shares deemed beneficially owned in this table does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership of those shares. Except as otherwise noted, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of the shares of common stock beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws, where applicable. |
|
(2) |
Consists of shares of common stock subject to stock options exercisable as of, or within 60 days of, March 31, 2022 and restricted stock units vesting within 60 days of March 31, 2022. Shares of common stock subject to stock options that are exercisable as of, or within 60 days of, March 31, 2022 and restricted stock units vesting within 60 days of March 31, 2022 are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding the option or the restricted stock unit for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of that person, but are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of any other person. |
|
(3) |
Includes shares held by the following entities over which Mr. Kirk (or an entity
over which he exercises exclusive control) exercises exclusive control: 479,857 shares held by JPK 2008 LLC, 3,597,953 shares held
by JPK 2009 LLC, 1,612,186 shares held by JPK 2012, LLC, 13,520,789 shares held by Kapital Joe, LLC, 447,405 shares held by Kellie
L. Banks (2009) Long Term Trust, 1,403 shares held by Lotus Capital (2000) Co., Inc., 478,894 shares held by MGK 2008 LLC, 3,838,992
shares held by MGK 2009 LLC, 1,594,863 shares held by MGK 2011, LLC, 19,037,059 shares held by R.J. Kirk Declaration of Trust, 16,406,828
shares held by Sunset 2020 LLC, 19,711 shares held by Third Security Incentive 2006 LLC, 832,500 shares held by Third Security Incentive
2007, 691,929 shares held by Third Security Incentive 2009, 1,384,408 shares held by Third Security Incentive 2010 LLC, 118,266 shares
held by Third Security Senior Staff 2006 LLC, 4,995,000 shares held by Third Security Senior Staff 2007, 3,223,803 shares held by
Third Security Senior Staff 2008 LLC, 989,252 shares held by Third Security Senior Staff 2015 LLC, 58,800 shares held by Third Security
Senior Staff LLC, 311,287 shares held by Third Security Staff 2001 LLC, 59,133 shares held by Third Security Staff 2006 LLC, 2,497,500
shares held by Third Security Staff 2007, 1,383,858 shares held by Third Security Staff 2009, 1,839,946 shares held by Third Security
Staff 2010 LLC, 989,243 shares held by Third Security Staff 2015 LLC, 567,535 shares held by ZSK 2008 LLC, and 342,685 shares held
by ZSK 2009 LLC, 1,000,000 shares held by Parkview 2020. Also includes 1,144,481 shares held by Alana D. Czypinski, Mr. Kirk’s
spouse. |
|
(4) |
Includes 3,000 shares held in the Sharma-Gupta Marital Property Trust, an affiliate of Vinita Gupta. |
|
(5) |
Includes 82,966 shares held in the Robert B. Shapiro Revocable Trust, an affiliate of Robert Shapiro. |
|
(6) |
Consists of 13 persons as of March 31, 2022. |
|
(7) |
Information is based on the Schedule 13G that was filed with the SEC on January 24, 2022 by Ares Trading SA (“Ares Trading”) and certain other information known to us. Ares Trading is a dominantly controlled subsidiary of Merck Serono S.A., Coinsins, Switzerland, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Merck Serono S.A., Coinsins, Switzerland is a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Merck Serono S.A., Coinsins, Switzerland and Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany may be deemed to possess sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the securities held of record by Ares Trading. The address of Ares Trading is Zone Industrielle de l’Outriettaz, 1170 Aubonne, Switzerland. |
|
(8) |
Messrs. Sterling, Osborne and Lambert’s employment was terminated on April 2, 2021, June 10,
2021 and February 18, 2022, respectively. Beneficial ownership included in the table above is as of each individual’s last date
of employment. |
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our
executive officers, directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in
ownership with the SEC and provide us with copies of such reports. Based solely on a review of the copies of these reports furnished to
us, we believe that all such filing requirements applicable to such officers and directors and greater than 10% shareholders were complied
with during 2021.
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Background
Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and
Governance Committee, the Board has unanimously nominated our ten incumbent directors, all of whom were elected by our shareholders at
our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting and to hold office until their successors have
been elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. Each nominee has consented to being named as such and to serve
as a director if elected.
Our Bylaws provide that, in uncontested director
elections (i.e., an election where the number of nominees is not greater than the number of directors to be elected), a nominee for director
will be elected to the Board if the votes cast for such nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against such nominee’s election.
However, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at any meeting of the shareholders for which (i) the Corporate Secretary
receives a notice that a shareholder has nominated a person for election to the Board in compliance with the advance notice requirements
for shareholder nominees for director set forth in the Bylaws and (ii) such nomination has not been withdrawn by such shareholder on or
prior to the 10th day preceding the date we first mail the notice of meeting for such meeting to the shareholders (i.e., if there is a
contested director election). If directors are to be elected by a plurality of the votes cast, the shareholders may withhold votes, but
will not be permitted to vote against a nominee.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that
any nominee for director in an uncontested election who receives a greater number of shareholder votes cast “against” his
or her election than votes “for” his or her election must, promptly following certification of the shareholder vote, tender
his or her resignation to the Board for consideration. The Nominating and Governance Committee will then evaluate the best interests of
the Company and will recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation. Following the Board’s receipt
of this recommendation and determination as to whether to accept the resignation, we will disclose the Board’s decision and an explanation
of how the decision was reached.
There were no nominee recommendations from shareholders
or from any group of shareholders submitted in accordance with our Bylaws. Proxies solicited by the Board will be voted in favor of the
nominees listed below unless otherwise specified in the proxy. We know of no reason why the nominees would not be available for election
or, if elected, would be unable to serve. While we do not anticipate that any of the nominees will be unable to serve, if any should be
unable to serve, the proxy holders reserve the right to substitute another person designated by the Board.
Vote Required and Board Recommendation
Each director nominee must receive the affirmative
vote of a majority of the votes cast in order to be elected. As this proposal is not considered a “routine item,” your bank,
broker, or other nominee cannot vote your shares without receiving your voting instructions. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not
count “for” or “against” the election of any nominee.
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS
VOTE “FOR” ALL OF THE PROPOSED DIRECTOR NOMINEES.
Nominees for Election as Directors
Set forth below is information for each nominee
concerning the individual’s age, principal occupation, employment and directorships during the past five years, positions with the
Company, the year in which he or she first joined the Board, and his or her term of office as a director. Also set forth below is a brief
discussion of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills that led to the Board’s conclusion that, in light of
our business and structure, each nominee should serve as a director.
Name,
Tenure, and Age |
Business
Experience During Past Five Years and Other Affiliations |
Randal Kirk
Executive Chairman of the Board
Director since 2008
Age 68
|
Mr. Kirk has served as Executive Chairman of the Board since
January 2020 and previously served as Chairman of the Board from February 2008 until December 31, 2019 and as our CEO from April
2009 until December 31, 2019. Mr. Kirk provides a wealth of
strategic, operational, and management experience. Mr. Kirk currently serves as Chairman and Senior Managing Director of
Third Security, LLC, an investment management firm founded by Mr. Kirk in March 1999. Additionally, Mr. Kirk founded and became
Chairman of the Board of New River Pharmaceuticals Inc. (a biopharmaceutical company previously traded on Nasdaq prior to its
acquisition by Shire plc in 2007) in 1996, and was President and CEO between October 2001 and April 2007.
Since May 2015, Mr. Kirk has served as a member of the board of directors
of the Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine. Previously, Mr. Kirk served as a member of the board of directors of Scios, Inc. (previously
traded on Nasdaq prior to its acquisition by Johnson & Johnson) between February 2000 and May 2002, as a member of the board of directors
of Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: HALO), a clinical-stage biotechnology company, from May 2007 to May 2018, as a member of the board
of directors of ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc. (Nasdaq: ZIOP), a biotechnology company, from January 2011 to October 2018, and as a member of
the board of directors of Clinical Data, Inc. (previously traded on Nasdaq prior to its acquisition by Forest Laboratories, Inc. in April
2011) from September 2002 to April 2011, and was Chairman of the board of directors from December 2004 to April 2011.
Mr. Kirk served on the board of visitors of Radford University from
July 2003 to June 2009, was Rector of the board of directors from September 2006 to September 2008 and served on the board of directors
of the Radford University Foundation, Inc. from September 1998 to May 2011. He served on the board of visitors of the University of Virginia
and Affiliated Schools from July 2009 to October 2012, on the Virginia Advisory Council on Revenue Estimates from July 2006 to October
2012 and on the Governor’s Economic Development and Jobs Creation Commission from April 2010 to October 2012. Mr. Kirk received
a B.A. in Business from Radford University and a J.D. from the University of Virginia.
We believe that Mr. Kirk’s business experience, including his
extensive business experience as CEO of multiple companies, his experience as an investor, his service on committees of academic institutions
and other public company boards, combined with his business acumen and judgment, provides the Board with valuable strategic and operational
expertise and leadership skills.
|
Name,
Tenure, and Age |
Business
Experience During Past Five Years and Other Affiliations |
Cesar Alvarez
Director since 2008
Age 74
|
Mr. Alvarez
has served as a Board member since 2008. Mr. Alvarez has been the Senior Chairman of the international law firm of Greenberg Traurig,
LLP since 2012. He previously served as the law firm’s Executive Chairman, and as its Chief Executive Officer from 1997 to 2012.
During his tenure as Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman, Mr. Alvarez led the firm to become one of the top ten law firms
in the United States by leading its growth from 325 lawyers in eight offices to approximately 1,850 attorneys and government professionals
in more than 36 locations in the United States, Europe, Asia, and Latin America. Mr. Alvarez also serves as Vice-Chairman of the board
of directors of Watsco, Inc. (NYSE: WSO), a distributor of air conditioning, heating and refrigeration equipment and related parts and
supplies; and a director of The St. Joe Company (NYSE: JOE), a real estate development company. Mr. Alvarez served on the board of directors
of Fairholme Funds, Inc., a family of publicly traded focused investment funds from May 2008 to February 2020 and Sears Holding Corporation,
a retail company, from January 2013 to May 2017. Mr. Alvarez served on the board of directors of Mednax, Inc. (NYSE: MD), a provider
of physician services, including newborn, maternal fetal, pediatric subspecialties, and anesthesia care from March 1997 to July 2020.
Mr. Alvarez holds a Bachelor of Science, a Master of Business Administration, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Florida. |
|
We believe Mr. Alvarez’s qualifications to serve on the Board
include his experience as Chief Executive Officer, Executive Chairman, and Senior Chairman of one of the nation’s largest law firms
with approximately $2 billion in revenues with 2,200 law professionals providing services in 42 locations across the country and abroad,
as well as his many years of corporate experience, both advising clients in the fields of corporate and securities and serving on the
boards of directors of publicly traded and private companies.
|
|
|
Steven Frank
Director since 2008
Age 62
|
Mr. Frank has served as a Board member since February 2008. Mr. Frank
has served as a Director of EXUMA Biotechnology Inc., a clinical-stage biotechnology company, since June 2020. Mr. Frank joined J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC, an investment bank, in June 2008 and currently serves as Chairman of Global Healthcare Investment Banking. Mr. Frank had
previously been the head of Bear Stearns’ Worldwide Health Care Investment Banking group in New York for 16 years and has provided
general investment banking services to all types of healthcare companies. Specifically, Mr. Frank has led or played major roles in hundreds
of mergers and acquisitions and financing transactions across the spectrum of deal structures. He has specialized in transactions involving
pharmaceutical, medical device, and biotechnology companies. Prior to joining Bear Stearns in 1993, Mr. Frank served for over ten years
as an institutional investor, primarily at State Farm Insurance Company, where he focused on a multibillion-dollar life-sciences portfolio.
Mr. Frank holds a B.S. from Illinois State University and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago.
Mr. Frank also has been on the Executive Board of Frost Museum of Science
since June 2020.
We believe Mr. Frank’s extensive knowledge of our industry and
of finance and capital structure strengthen the Board’s collective qualifications, skills, and experience.
|
Name,
Tenure, and Age |
Business
Experience During Past Five Years and Other Affiliations |
Vinita Gupta
Director since 2017
Age 54
|
Ms. Gupta has served as a Board member since April 2017. Since September
2012, Ms. Gupta has served as the chief executive officer of Lupin Limited (“Lupin”). Lupin, headquartered in Mumbai, India,
is an innovation led global pharmaceutical company developing and delivering a wide range of branded and generic formulations, biotechnology
products and APIs. Ms. Gupta has served as a director of Lupin since 2001 and serves on its Risk Management Committee. In addition, Ms.
Gupta has served as the Chief Executive Officer and chairperson of Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the U.S. wholly owned subsidiary of Lupin,
since 2003. Ms. Gupta served as director on the board of Lupin’s Japanese subsidiary Kyowa Pharmaceuticals from 2007 until the sale
of that business in 2019. Ms. Gupta has held various positions at Lupin since joining the company in 1993. In 2017, Ms. Gupta also became
a member of the Global Advisory Board at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.
|
|
Ms. Gupta was named 2015 Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year
and won the 2016 Forbes India Leadership Awards – Entrepreneur of the Year. Ms. Gupta is regularly named in Forbes Asia Top 50 Power
Business women listings for Asia Pacific. Ms. Gupta graduated from the University of Mumbai with a degree in pharmacy and received her
MBA from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.
We believe Ms. Gupta’s qualifications to serve on our board of
directors include her strong leadership and management experience within the pharmaceutical industry, including serving as the chief executive
officer of a global pharmaceutical corporation and her significant knowledge of operations, strategy, government relations, regulatory,
finance and investments and mergers and acquisitions, including the fact that she was not only responsible for setting up Lupin’s
business in the U.S and Europe but was instrumental in formulating and executing strategies that have helped Lupin emerge as a global
pharmaceutical corporation.
|
|
|
Name,
Tenure, and Age |
Business
Experience During Past Five Years and Other Affiliations |
Fred Hassan
Director since 2016
Age 76
|
Mr. Hassan has served as a Board member since June 2016. Mr. Hassan
joined Warburg Pincus LLC, a global private equity investment institution, in 2010 and currently serves as Director. Previously, Mr. Hassan
served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Schering-Plough from 2003 to 2009. Before assuming these roles, from 2001 to 2003, Mr.
Hassan was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Pharmacia Corporation, a company formed as a result of the merger of Monsanto Company
and Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. He joined Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. as Chief Executive Officer in 1997. Mr. Hassan previously held
leadership positions with Wyeth serving as Executive Vice President, and was a member of the board from 1995 to 1997. Earlier in his career,
he spent a significant tenure with Sandoz Pharmaceuticals and headed the company’s U.S. pharmaceuticals business.
Mr Hassan has been a director of BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (Nasdaq: BBIO)
since August 2021 and a director of Prometheus Biosciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: RXDX) since May 2021.Mr. Hassan served as a director of Time
Warner Inc. from October 2009 to June 2018 and a director of Amgen, Inc. (Nasdaq: AMGN) since July 2015. In the course of his career,
he has held numerous directorships, including those at Avon Products, Inc. from 1999 to 2013, Bausch & Lomb from 2010 until its acquisition
by Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. (NYSE: VRX) (“Valeant”) in 2013, and Valeant from 2013 to 2014.
Mr. Hassan has chaired notable pharmaceutical industry organizations
including The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) and The International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
Associations (IFPMA) and is also a member of The Business Council. Mr. Hassan received a B.S. degree in chemical engineering from the
Imperial College of Science and Technology at the University of London and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
We believe Mr. Hassan’s qualifications to serve on the Board
include his strong leadership and management experience within our industry, including significant knowledge of operations, strategy,
government relations, regulatory, finance and investments, and mergers and acquisitions.
|
|
|
Jeffrey Kindler
Director since 2011
Age 66
|
Mr. Kindler has served as a Board member since November 2011. He is the Chief Executive Officer of Centrexion Corporation, a privately held clinical stage biopharmaceutical company, since October 2013; an Operating Partner at Artis Ventures, a leading venture capital firm, since April 2020; and a Senior Advisor at Blackstone, one of the world’s leading investment firms, since August 2020, Senior Advisor at Blackstone, an investment firm, since August 2020. Mr. Kindler was Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Pfizer, Inc. (NYSE: PFE), a pharmaceutical company, from 2006 until his retirement in December 2010. He joined Pfizer in 2002 as Executive Vice President and General Counsel and assumed positions of increasing responsibility until being named Chief Executive Officer in 2006. Prior to joining Pfizer, he was Vice President of Litigation and Legal Policy at General Electric Company, Executive Vice President and General Counsel at McDonald’s, and President at Partner Brands.
|
|
In addition to serving on Precigen’s Board, Mr. Kindler currently
serves on the boards of Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: TERN), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, and Perrigo Company plc
(NYSE; TASE: PRGO), a healthcare company. Mr. Kindler also serves as a board member for a number of privately held companies and for several
civic, charitable, educational and other organizations. He also serves as Chairman of the GLG Institute. Previously, Mr. Kindler served
on the board of PPD, Inc. (Nasdaq: PPD), a provider of drug development services, Siga Technologies, Inc. (Nasdaq: SIGA), a developer
of novel antiviral therapeutics, vTv Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: VTVT), a development-stage biopharmaceutical company, and Chipotle Mexican
Grill, Inc. (NYSE: CMG), a chain of Mexican restaurants. Mr. Kindler received a B.A. from Tufts University and a J.D. from Harvard Law
School.
We believe Mr. Kindler brings leadership, extensive business, operating,
legal and policy, and corporate strategy experience to the Board, along with tremendous knowledge of several of the industries in which
we operate as well as the fundamentals of our business.
|
Name,
Tenure, and Age |
Business
Experience During Past Five Years and Other Affiliations |
Dean Mitchell
Director since 2009
Age 66
|
Mr. Mitchell has served as a Board member since March 2009. In July
2013, Mr. Mitchell was appointed Executive Chairman and board member of Covis Pharma Holdings S.a.r.l., a private specialty pharmaceutical
company, which was sold in March 2020 to Apollo Capital. In 2020, he joined the boards of Kinnate Biopharma Inc. (Nasdaq: KNTE) and Praxis
Precision Medicines Inc. (Nasdaq: PRAX), in both cases as Chairman. Since 2012, he has served as a non-executive board member of ImmunoGen,
Inc. (Nasdaq: IMGN), a public oncology company, and since July 2014 he has served as a board member of Theravance Biopharma, Inc. (Nasdaq:
TBPH), a public specialty pharmaceutical company. Mr. Mitchell also has served as Chairman and board member of PaxVax Inc., a private
specialty vaccine company, since December 2015.
Previously, Mr. Mitchell was President and Chief Executive Officer
and a board member of Lux Biosciences, Inc., a privately held ophthalmology company, from July 2010 until June 2013. Prior to that, he
was President and Chief Executive Officer of Alpharma Inc., a global specialty pharmaceutical company, and also was appointed a member
of its board of directors in July 2006. Alpharma Inc. was acquired by King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in December 2008, and Mr. Mitchell ceased
to be an officer and a director of Alpharma Inc. in December 2008. Prior to this, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Guilford
Pharmaceuticals Inc., a public company, from December 2004 until its acquisition by MGI Pharma Inc., a public biopharmaceutical company
focused in oncology and acute care, in October 2005, and was a non-executive director of MGI Pharma Inc. until its acquisition by Eisai
Co., Ltd. in January 2008. Mr. Mitchell was at Bristol-Myers Squibb, a public company, from 2001 until 2004 in several key leadership
roles including President International, President U.S. Primary Care and Vice President, Strategy. He also spent 15 years at Glaxo SmithKline,
a public company, and its predecessor companies, most recently as Senior Vice President, Clinical Development and Product Strategy from
1999 to 2001, and prior to that as Vice President and General Manager, Specialty Divisions, Strategic Planning and Business Development,
from 1995 to 1999. Mr. Mitchell received an M.B.A. from City University Business School, in London, U.K., and a B.Sc. degree in biology
from Coventry University, U.K.
We believe Mr. Mitchell brings to the Board extensive experience in
the pharmaceutical industry, specifically in the areas of management, business and corporate development, sales and marketing, and clinical
development as well as his significant experience serving on boards of directors of companies in our industry.
|
Name,
Tenure, and Age |
Business
Experience During Past Five Years and Other Affiliations |
Helen Sabzevari
Director since 2020
Age 60
|
Dr. Sabzevari has served as Board member since June 2020, as our President
and Chief Executive Officer since January 2020, and as President of PGEN Therapeutics, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, since December
2017. Dr. Sabzevari also has served as a board member of Kinnate Biopharma Inc. (Nasdaq: KNTE) since June 2021. From July 2017 to December
2017, Dr. Sabzevari served as our Senior Vice President, Health Therapeutics as well as Head of Research and Development. Prior to joining
the Company, from 2015 to 2017, Dr. Sabzevari co-founded and served as Chief Scientific Officer of Compass Therapeutics LLC, a fully integrated
drug discovery and development company focused on manipulating the immune system to treat human disease. From 2008 to 2014, Dr. Sabzevari
served as Senior Vice President of Immuno-Oncology as well as Global Head of Immunotherapy, Oncology, Global Research and Early Development
at EMD Serono (a subsidiary of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). From 1998 to 2008, Dr. Sabzevari led the Molecular Immunology Group at
the Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology at the US National Cancer Institute, where she was focused on design, development, and
delivery of novel vaccines and immunotherapies for a range of human cancers. Dr. Sabzevari received her doctorate degree in cell and molecular
immunology and completed her postdoctoral work at the department of immunology at the Scripps Research Institute, working on various immunotherapeutic
modalities in the treatment of cancer and autoimmune diseases.
We believe Dr. Sabzevari brings to the Board expertise in research
and development of immunotherapy-based therapeutics, experience translating novel treatments from preclinical stage into the clinic, and
extensive leadership experience and knowledge of the industry.
|
|
|
Robert Shapiro
Lead Independent Director
Director since 2011
Age 83
|
Mr. Shapiro has served as a Board member since November 2011. Mr. Shapiro is Chairman, Managing Director and Co-Founder of Sandbox Industries, which manages venture funds, including the BlueCross BlueShield Venture Partners funds and the Cultivan Sandbox Food & Agriculture Venture Funds. Mr. Shapiro has served as Managing Director of Sandbox Industries since its formation in 2004. He was formerly Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Monsanto Company from 1995 to 2000. Upon the merger of Monsanto Company with Pharmacia & Upjohn, he served as Chairman of the newly formed Pharmacia Corporation. Previously, Mr. Shapiro was President and Chief Operating Officer of Monsanto Company from 1992 to 1995 and President of Monsanto Company’s Agriculture Group from 1990 to 1992, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The NutraSweet Company, a subsidiary of Monsanto Company, from 1985 to 1990 and President of the NutraSweet Group of G.D. Searle & Co., or Searle, from 1982 to 1985, where he previously served as Vice President and General Counsel. Before joining Searle, Mr. Shapiro was Vice President and General Counsel of General Instrument Corporation from 1972 to 1979. Prior to this, he practiced law in New York City; served in government as Special Assistant to the General Counsel and later to the Undersecretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation; and served as a professor of law at Northeastern University in Boston and the University of Wisconsin in Madison. |
Name,
Tenure, and Age |
Business
Experience During Past Five Years and Other Affiliations |
|
Mr. Shapiro previously served on the boards of directors of the New
York Stock Exchange (later NYSE Euronext), Citigroup Inc., Rockwell International, Silicon Graphics Inc. and Sapphire Energy, Inc. He
currently serves as a director of Advanced Animal Diagnostics, Inc., a privately held corporation. Mr. Shapiro has served on the President’s
Advisory Committee on Trade Policy and on the White House Domestic Policy Review of Industrial Innovation. He is a fellow of the American
Academy of Arts and Sciences. Mr. Shapiro is a graduate of Harvard College and holds a J.D. from Columbia University School of Law.
We believe Mr. Shapiro brings to the Board particular knowledge and
experience in: strategic planning and leadership of complex organizations; accounting, finance and capital structure; legal, regulatory
and government affairs; people management; and board practices of other entities, which strengthen the Board’s collective qualifications,
skills, and experience.
|
|
|
James Turley
Director since 2014
Age 66
|
Mr. Turley has served as a Board member since April 2014. Mr. Turley
also serves on the board of directors of Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C), a leading global bank, Citibank, N.A., the commercial banking operations
of Citigroup Inc., since July 2013, Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR), a global leader in bringing technology and engineering together
to provide innovative solutions for customers in industrial, commercial, and consumer markets around the world, since July 2013, and Northrop
Grumman Corporation (NYSE: NOC), a leading global security company providing innovative systems, products and solutions to government
and commercial customers worldwide, since April 2015. Mr. Turley previously served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ernst
& Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) from 2001 until his retirement in June 2013. From 1994 to 2001, Mr. Turley served as
Regional Managing Partner of Ernst & Young.
Mr. Turley is also a board member of the Boy Scouts of America, a board
member of Kohler Co. (a privately held company) since April 2016 and St. Louis Trust Company (a privately-held company) since April 2019.
He is also a board member of the MUNY Theatre of St. Louis and Forest Park Forever. Mr. Turley holds an undergraduate degree and a master’s
degree in accounting from Rice University.
We believe Mr. Turley’s extensive management experience as the
former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of one of the world’s largest accounting firms, his accounting and financial expertise,
and his experience in serving on the boards of directors of publicly traded companies make him well qualified to serve on the Board. Having
served as Chair and CEO of Ernst & Young, Mr. Turley developed significant expertise in the areas of compensation, litigation, corporate
affairs, and corporate governance. Mr. Turley also possesses extensive knowledge and expertise in the areas of financial reporting, business,
and risk management.
|
BOARD DIVERSITY MATRIX
The following matrix is provided in accordance with applicable Nasdaq
listing requirements:
Board Diversity Matrix (as of April 29, 2022) |
Total Number of Directors |
10 |
|
Female |
Male |
Part I: Gender Identity: |
Directors |
2 |
8 |
Part II: Demographic Background: |
Asian |
1 |
1 |
Hispanic or Latinx |
- |
1 |
Middle Eastern |
1 |
- |
White |
- |
6 |
Director
Compensation
Non-Employee Director Compensation
The compensation of our non-employee directors
is established by the Compensation Committee and the Board. This compensation is periodically reviewed by the Compensation Committee based
on market practice information provided by our outside compensation consultant, to ensure continued alignment with company goals and shareholder
interest. Under our non-employee director compensation policy adopted in December 2017, our non-employee directors received in 2021 the
compensation set forth in the table below. We also reimburse our non-employee directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred
in connection with attending Board and committee meetings.
Element
of Compensation |
Compensation
Amount |
Annual Retainer for Board Chair (1) |
$100,000 |
Annual Retainer for Other Board Members (1) |
$50,000 |
Committee Chair Additional Retainer (1) |
$12,500 |
Committee Member Additional Retainer (1) |
$6,500 |
Annual Equity Awards |
Options with a value of $125,000 (2)
RSUs with a value of $125,000 (3) |
Initial Appointment Equity Awards |
Options with a value of $180,000 (4)
RSUs with a value of $180,000 (5) |
____________________
|
(1) |
Non-employee directors have the option to receive shares of common stock, valued at the fair market value at the time of issuance, in lieu of cash retainers. We do not issue, nor do we pay cash for, fractional shares. Annual retainer fees are payable in advance at the first regularly scheduled meeting of the Board for the calendar year. |
|
(2) |
All non-employee directors are entitled to an annual grant of options to purchase shares of common stock (with an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant), which are granted at the first regularly scheduled meeting of the Board for the calendar year and are fully vested at the time of grant. |
|
(3) |
All non-employee directors are entitled to an annual grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”), which are granted at the first regularly scheduled meeting of the Board for the calendar year and vest in full on the one year anniversary of the date of the grant. |
|
(4) |
Any newly appointed non-employee director receives, upon appointment, a one-time grant of options to purchase shares of common stock (with an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant), with one quarter of such options vesting each year on the anniversary of appointment to the Board, subject to continued Board service. |
|
(5) |
Any newly appointed non-employee director receives, upon appointment, a one-time grant of RSUs, which vest in full on the one year anniversary of appointment to the Board, subject to continued Board service. |
Director
Compensation Table for 2021
The following table discloses all compensation
provided to the non-employee directors for the most recently completed fiscal year ended December 31, 2021:
Name(1) |
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(2)
($) |
|
Stock Awards(3)(5)
($) |
|
Option Awards(4)(5)
($) |
|
Total
($) |
Randal Kirk |
|
|
99,999 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
599,999 |
|
Cesar Alvarez |
|
|
62,497 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
312,497 |
|
Steven Frank |
|
|
49,999 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
299,999 |
|
Vinita Gupta |
|
|
56,499 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
306,499 |
|
Fred Hassan |
|
|
56,499 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
306,499 |
|
Jeffrey Kindler |
|
|
68,997 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
318,997 |
|
Dean Mitchell |
|
|
56,499 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
306,499 |
|
Robert Shapiro |
|
|
62,998 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
312,998 |
|
James Turley |
|
|
62,497 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
312,497 |
|
________________
|
(1) |
Dr. Sabzevari, our CEO, is a named executive officer and therefore
the compensation she received is shown in the Summary Compensation Table and not included in this table. Dr. Sabzevari is an employee
of the Company and receives no compensation for her service as a director.
Mr. Kirk, our Executive Chairman, is a non-employee member of the Board.
|
|
(2) |
Our directors may elect to receive any portion of their annual retainer fees in shares of our common stock instead of cash. During 2021, each of our directors elected to receive all annual retainer fees in shares of our common stock. The following table provides the number of shares of our common stock received in lieu of the cash retainer by each non-employee director for 2021: |
Name |
Shares
of Common Stock Received
(#) |
Randal Kirk |
12,970 |
Cesar Alvarez |
8,106 |
Steven Frank |
6,485 |
Vinita Gupta |
7,328 |
Fred Hassan |
7,328 |
Jeffrey Kindler |
8,949 |
Dean Mitchell |
7,328 |
Robert Shapiro |
8,171 |
James Turley |
8,106 |
|
(3) |
Represents the aggregate grant date fair market value of the annual grant of RSUs, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC Topic 718”). |
|
(4) |
Represents the aggregate grant date fair market value of the annual grant of stock options, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. For a full description of the assumptions we use in computing this amount, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021, which is included in our 2021 Annual Report. |
|
(5) |
The following table provides information regarding the aggregate outstanding equity awards held by each non-employee director as of December 31, 2021: |
Name |
|
RSUs Outstanding (#) |
|
Stock Options Outstanding (#) |
|
Randal Kirk |
|
|
39,312 |
|
|
|
118,870 |
|
|
Cesar Alvarez |
|
|
16,212 |
|
|
|
242,300 |
|
|
Steven Frank |
|
|
16,212 |
|
|
|
242,300 |
|
|
Vinita Gupta |
|
|
16,212 |
|
|
|
230,127 |
|
|
Fred Hassan |
|
|
16,212 |
|
|
|
245,347 |
|
|
Jeffrey Kindler |
|
|
16,212 |
|
|
|
242,299 |
|
|
Dean Mitchell |
|
|
16,212 |
|
|
|
242,300 |
|
|
Robert Shapiro |
|
|
16,212 |
|
|
|
242,299 |
|
|
James Turley |
|
|
16,212 |
|
|
|
277,933 |
|
|
Equity Ownership for Board of Directors
The Board believes that directors should hold
meaningful equity ownership positions in the Company to help align the interests of directors with those of shareholders. Under our stock
ownership guidelines for directors, non-employee directors are expected to be beneficial owners of shares of our common stock with a market
value equivalent to at least five times the amount of annual cash retainer fees (not including any additional retainer for service as
a Committee Chair or Lead Independent Director, and as adjusted from time to time). Non-employee directors have five years to satisfy
the ownership requirement, which is measured from the later of June 2018 (when the current requirement was adopted) or the date of appointment
for newly appointed non-employee directors. Compliance with the requirement is measured on an annual basis each year using the closing
price of our common stock as of December 31st. As of December 31, 2021, each of our non-employee directors is either in satisfaction of
the ownership requirement, or is on track to satisfy the ownership requirement within the five-year period.
For purposes of the equity ownership guidelines
described above, a non-employee director’s shareholdings include, in addition to shares held outright, any stock underlying vested
but unexercised stock options assuming the stock options have been “net exercised”. Stock underlying equity awards that remain
unvested will not count towards the requirement, regardless of whether the award is time- or performance-based.
Until a non-employee director has met our equity
ownership guidelines, he or she is expected to hold 100% of any stock acquired through exercise of a stock option or vesting and settlement
of restricted stock units, net of shares sold to cover the cost of acquisition and any applicable tax obligation. In addition, non-employee
directors must further hold all net shares for a minimum of one year following exercise, in the case of stock options, or vesting, in
the case of other equity awards.
PROPOSAL 2
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Background
After consideration of the firm’s qualifications
and past performance, the Board, through the Audit Committee, has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as our
independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.
Deloitte was initially engaged as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. The Audit Committee has again selected Deloitte as our
independent registered accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022 and believes that the retention of Deloitte for the 2022
fiscal year is in the best interest of us and our shareholders.
Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules
of the SEC promulgated thereunder, the Audit Committee is solely responsible for the selection, appointment, compensation, and oversight
of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm. Although submission of the appointment of an independent registered
public accounting firm to shareholders for ratification is not required by law, the
Board considers
the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm to be an important matter of shareholder concern and is submitting
the appointment of Deloitte for ratification by our shareholders, as a matter of good corporate practice. One or more representatives
of Deloitte are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and to be available
to respond to appropriate questions.
If shareholders do not ratify the selection of
Deloitte, the Audit Committee may, but is not required to, reconsider its selection if the shareholders’ action so warrants. Even
if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, exercising its own discretion, may select different auditors at any time during the
year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interests and in the best interests of our shareholders.
Required Vote and Board Recommendation
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast on the matter is required for the approval of this item. As this proposal is considered a “routine item,” your bank,
broker, or other nominee may vote your shares “for” the proposal without receiving your voting instructions. Abstentions and
broker non-votes will not count either in favor of or against the proposal.
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS
VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Principal Accountant Fees
The following table summarizes the aggregate fees
billed by Deloitte for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and, for comparison purposes, the aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. The Audit Committee approved all of the services described below.
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, |
|
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
1,731,700 |
|
|
$ |
1,669,500 |
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
Tax Fees |
|
|
234,084 |
|
|
|
196,928 |
|
All Other Fees |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total Fees |
|
$ |
1,965,784 |
|
|
$ |
2,041,428 |
|
Audit Fees
Audit fees include professional services rendered
by our independent auditors for the audit of our annual financial statements, including the reviews of the financial statements included
in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. This category also includes fees for assistance with complex accounting transactions, fees for
audits provided in connection with subsidiaries and statutory filings or services that generally only the principal auditor can reasonably
provide to a client, and consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
Audit-Related Fees
Audit-related fees consist of amounts for a comfort
letter issued in connection with a registration statement.
Tax Fees
Tax fees include original and amended tax returns,
studies supporting tax return amounts as may be required by Internal Revenue Service regulations, claims for refunds, assistance with
tax audits and other work directly affecting or supporting the payment of taxes, planning, research, and advice supporting our efforts
to maximize the tax efficiency of our operations.
All Other Fees
All other fees are fees for products or services
other than those in the above three categories. In fiscal years 2021 and 2020, our independent auditors did not provide any services other
than those described above.
Pre-Approval Policy
The Audit Committee has adopted a written policy
for the provision of audit services and permitted non-audit services by our independent registered public accounting firm. Our Chief Financial
Officer has primary responsibility to the Audit Committee for administration and enforcement of this policy and for reporting non-compliance.
Under the policy, the Audit Committee receives a presentation of an annual plan for audit services and for any proposed audit-related,
tax, or other non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, but management may, from time to
time, seek approval of certain additional audit or non-audit services not provided for in the budget. Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X provides
an exception to the requirement for pre-approval of non-audit services for de minimis amounts under certain circumstances. Our
policy does not include the de minimis exception, and during fiscal years 2021 and 2020, no non-audit services were performed pursuant
to the de minimis exception.
Audit
Committee Report
In accordance with the Audit Committee Charter,
the Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of the integrity of our accounting, auditing, and
financial reporting practices. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, the Audit Committee met 9 times.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed our
audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021 with management and Deloitte. Management has the responsibility
for the preparation of our financial statements and Deloitte has the responsibility for the audit of those statements. Based on the above-mentioned
review and discussions with management and Deloitte, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that our audited financial statements
be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, for filing with the SEC.
In addition, the Audit Committee reviewed and
discussed the interim financial information contained in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q with our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief
Financial Officer, our Chief Legal Officer, and the independent registered public accounting firm prior to public release.
In discharging its oversight responsibility as
to the audit process, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte required under the applicable
requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) regarding Deloitte’s communications with the
Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm its independence. The
Audit Committee also discussed with management the quality and adequacy of our internal controls. The Audit Committee reviewed with Deloitte
their audit plans, audit scope, and identification of audit risks.
The Audit Committee members are not professional
accountants or auditors, and their functions are not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management or our independent
registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee oversees our financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Our management
has primary responsibility for the financial statements and reporting process, including our internal control over financial reporting.
Deloitte is responsible for performing an integrated audit of our financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in
accordance with the auditing standards of the PCAOB.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with
Deloitte the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC, and, with and without management
present, discussed and reviewed the results of Deloitte’s audit of the financial statements. The Audit Committee also considered,
as it determined appropriate, tax matters, and other areas of financial reporting and the audit process over which the Audit Committee
has oversight.
In connection with the evaluation, appointment,
and retention of the independent auditors, the Audit Committee annually reviews the qualifications, performance, and independence of the
independent auditor, and lead engagement partner, and assures the regular rotation of the lead engagement partner as required. In doing
so, the Audit Committee considers a number of factors including, but not limited to: quality of services provided; technical expertise
and knowledge of the industry; effective communication; and objectivity. The Audit Committee also considers whether the non-audit services
provided by Deloitte are compatible with maintaining Deloitte’s independence. The Audit Committee reappointed Deloitte, subject
to shareholder ratification, as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.
The Audit Committee
Jeffrey Kindler, Chair
Dean Mitchell
Robert Shapiro
PROPOSAL 3
NON-BINDING PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF THE
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
General
The Board has determined to provide our shareholders
the opportunity to vote each year to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in
this Proxy Statement. The compensation of our named executive officers is described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation
tables and the accompanying narratives herein.
The Compensation Committee designs our executive
compensation program to attract, motivate, and retain executive officers who are critical to our success. Under these programs, our named
executive officers are rewarded for the achievement of our near-term and longer-term financial and strategic goals and for driving corporate
financial performance and stability. The programs contain elements of cash and equity-based compensation and are designed to align the
interests of our executives with those of our shareholders.
Our compensation program reflects competition
and reasonable practices in the marketplace. The mix of compensation components is competitive with that of other companies of similar
size and operational characteristics, links compensation to individual and corporate performance and encourages stock ownership by senior
management. The Compensation Committee continues to review, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, our executive
compensation program to ensure continued alignment with market practice with a focus on tying executive pay to long-term shareholder value
creation. Based on its review of the total compensation of our named executive officers for 2021, the Compensation Committee believes
that the total compensation for each of the named executive officers is reasonable and effectively achieves the objective of aligning
compensation with the achievement of our financial goals and creation of shareholder value without encouraging our named executive officers
to take unnecessary or excessive risks.
The Compensation Discussion and Analysis section
of this Proxy Statement and the accompanying tables and narrative provide a comprehensive review of our named executive officer compensation
objectives, program, and rationale. We urge you to read this disclosure before voting on this proposal.
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the
Board is requesting shareholders approve an advisory vote on the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that our shareholders approve, on a non-binding
advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in the Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,
the Summary Compensation Table, the other related tables and the accompanying narrative.”
As an advisory vote, your vote on this proposal
will be non-binding on the Board. However, the Board values the opinions that our shareholders express in their votes and will consider
the outcome of the vote when making future executive compensation decisions as it deems appropriate.
We seek shareholder approval of our executive
compensation on an annual basis. The next opportunity for our shareholders to approve on a non-binding basis the compensation of our named
executive officers will be at our 2023 Annual Meeting.
Vote Required and Board Recommendation
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast on the matter is required for the approval of this item. As this proposal is not considered a “routine item,” your bank,
broker, or other nominee cannot vote
your shares
without receiving your voting instructions. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count either in favor of or against the proposal.
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS
VOTE TO APPROVE THE NON-BINDING ADVISORY PROPOSAL APPROVING THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
Identification
of Executive Officers
Set forth below is information regarding the position,
age, and business experience of each of our executive officers.
Helen Sabzevari, Ph.D., age 60, Chief Executive
Officer. For more information about Dr. Sabzevari, please see her biography under “Nominees for Election as Directors.”
Harry Thomasian Jr., age 60, Chief
Financial Officer. Mr. Thomasian has served as our Chief Financial Officer since October 2021. Mr. Thomasian has over 35
years of international business experience in the areas of accounting, corporate financings and advisory services. Prior to joining
Precigen, he was with Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”), one of the world’s largest global professional services firms,
since 1986. Mr. Thomasian most recently served as a senior client service partner, the Baltimore office Growth Markets Leader and was
the co-leader for the Firm’s life sciences practice for the Chesapeake Region. He was previously a senior partner in
EY’s Capital Markets Center in Tokyo, Japan, and has held various other global, regional and local leadership positions with
EY. In addition, Mr. Thomasian has significant experience as a member of Boards of Directors (including chairing various committees)
for a number of not-for-profit institutions. Mr. Thomasian earned a B.S. in accountancy from Bentley University. He also completed
EY’s executive education program in strategic leadership at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School. Mr. Thomasian is a
Certified Public Accountant.
Donald P. Lehr, age 47, Chief Legal Officer.
Mr. Lehr has served as our Chief Legal Officer since 2011. From 2009 to 2011 he served as our Associate General Counsel. Mr. Lehr has
broad experience in the areas of corporate, securities, and general business law. Prior to joining us, he practiced law with the law firm
of Hogan Lovells US LLP (formerly Hogan & Hartson, LLP) in Baltimore, Maryland from 2002 to 2009. While at Hogan Lovells, his practice
included the representation of privately and publicly held corporations across many industries, including biotechnology, pharmaceuticals,
healthcare, software, technology, and manufacturing. Prior to his time at Hogan Lovells, Mr. Lehr served as a judicial clerk for the Honorable
Irma S. Raker of the Court of Appeals of Maryland. Mr. Lehr received a B.A. from Swarthmore College and received a J.D. from the University
of Maryland School of Law.
Jeffrey Perez, age 50, Senior Vice President,
Intellectual Property Affairs. Mr. Perez has served as our Senior Vice President, Intellectual Property Affairs since August 2014.
Until April 20, 2020 Mr. Perez served as a member of the board of directors of AquaBounty Technologies Inc., a public biotechnology company
(Nasdaq: AQB) that was our majority-owned subsidiary until October 2019. Before joining Precigen, Mr. Perez was Managing Director and
Associate General Counsel and Intellectual Property at Third Security, LLC, where he evaluated potential investments of Third Security’s
managed investment funds. Additionally, Mr. Perez worked with Third Security portfolio companies in evaluating and developing their intellectual
property strategies and general corporate activities. Prior to joining Third Security, Mr. Perez practiced intellectual property law with
the law firm of Hunton & Williams LLP in Washington D.C. Mr. Perez’s previous work involved client consultation, litigation,
agreement work, opinion drafting, and patent procurement. Mr. Perez received a B.S. from Cornell University and his J.D. from George Mason
University School of Law.
Rick Sterling, age 58, Former Chief Financial
Officer. Mr. Sterling served as our Chief Financial Officer from 2007 through April 2, 2021. Prior to joining us, he was
with KPMG where he worked in the audit practice for over 17 years, with a client base primarily in the healthcare, technology, and manufacturing
industries. Mr. Sterling is currently a member of the board of directors of AquaBounty Technologies Inc., a (Nasdaq: AQB) that was our
majority-owned subsidiary until October 2019.
D. Bradford (“Brad”) Osborne,
age 42, Former Vice President, Finance and Accounting. Mr. Osborne has served as our Vice President, Finance and Accounting 2016
through June 10, 2021. From 2011 to 2016 he served as our Senior Director, Finance and Accounting and Executive Director, Finance and
Accounting. Effective April 2, 2021, Mr. Osborne was appointed to serve as our principal accounting officer for an interim period while
the Company searched for Mr. Sterling’s replacement as Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining us, Mr. Osborne was the Accounting
Director, Portfolio Investments for Third
Security,
LLC, where he advised Third Security’s portfolio companies on accounting and finance matters. Prior to Third Security, Mr. Osborne
was with KPMG LLP where he worked in the audit practice for over six years beginning his career as an Associate and advancing to Senior
Manager. His client base was primarily in the life sciences and manufacturing industries.
James V. Lambert, age 57, Former
Executive Director, Finance for PGEN Therapeutics, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Effective June 10, 2021,
the Company appointed James V. Lambert, to serve as principal accounting officer for an interim period until Mr. Thomasian was
appointed as the Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Lambert joined PGEN Therapeutics in June 2017 in connection with our acquisition of
GenVec, Inc. and served in the role of Executive Director, Finance until February 18, 2022. From 2014 to 2017 Mr. Lambert served in
the positions of GenVec’s Senior Director and then Vice President, Accounting and Finance, Corporate Controller and Treasurer.
During this period Mr. Lambert also served as GenVec’s principal financial officer and principal accounting officer.
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The Compensation Committee oversees our executive
compensation programs. In this role, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves all compensation decisions relating to our named
executive officers. To assist with its duties, the Compensation Committee has engaged an independent compensation consultant to provide
competitive compensation data and assist with the analysis and implementation of various aspects of our executive compensation decisions.
See “—The Compensation Review Process” below for a discussion of the role of the compensation consultants engaged by
the Compensation Committee in 2021.
This section discusses the principles underlying
our executive compensation programs, policies, and decisions and explains the process the Compensation Committee uses to determine compensation
and benefits for our named executive officers. It also provides qualitative information regarding the manner and context in which compensation
is earned by and awarded to our named executive officers and is intended to place in perspective the data presented in the tables and
narrative that follow.
The discussion and analysis of our compensation
program for our named executive officers should be read in conjunction with the tables and text elsewhere in this Proxy Statement that
describe the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our named executive officers.
The individuals who served as our principal executive
officer and principal financial officers during 2021, as well as the other individuals included in the Summary Compensation Table, are
referred to throughout this Proxy Statement as the “named executive officers” and, to the extent they remain employed by us,
together with the other executives of management, as the “executive officers.” As previously disclosed, the Company undertook
an extensive search process for a permanent chief financial officer in 2021 following the resignation of Rick Sterling from his position
as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer on April 2, 2021, which included D. Bradford Osborne and James V. Lambert successively
serving as interim principal financial and accounting officers before the Company hired Harry Thomasian Jr. in October 2021 as its permanent
Chief Financial Officer.
Accordingly, our named executive officers for
2021 are:
Name |
Position |
Helen Sabzevari, Ph.D. |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Harry Thomasian Jr.(1) |
Chief Financial Officer |
Donald P. Lehr |
Chief Legal Officer |
Jeffrey Perez |
Senior Vice President, Intellectual Property Affairs |
Rick Sterling (2) |
Former Chief Financial Officer |
Brad Osborne (3) |
Former Interim CFO and Interim Principal Accounting Officer |
James V. Lambert (4) |
Former Interim CFO and Interim Principal Accounting Officer |
| (1) | Mr. Thomasian was appointed as the Company’s CFO effective October 18, 2021. |
| (2) | Mr. Sterling’s employment terminated on April 2, 2021. |
| (3) | Mr. Osborne served as interim CFO and interim principal accounting officer from April 2, 2021 to June 10, 2021, after which he terminated
his employment with us. |
| (4) | Mr. Lambert served as interim CFO and interim principal accounting officer from June 10, 2021 to October 18, 2021, after which he
stepped down from that position and continued his employment with the Company as Executive Director, Finance for PGEN Therapeutics, Inc.,
a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company until February 18, 2022, when he terminated his employment with us. |
Executive Summary
Our goal for our executive compensation is to
provide a comprehensive package that is sufficient to attract, motivate, and retain executives of outstanding ability, performance, and
potential. The Compensation Committee seeks to establish and maintain an appropriate relationship between executive compensation and the
creation of shareholder value. The Compensation Committee believes that the most
effective
compensation program is one that provides competitive base pay, rewards the achievement of established annual and long-term goals and
objectives, and provides incentives for retention.
The Compensation Committee assists the Board in
fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the compensation of our executive officers. The Compensation Committee is responsible
for:
|
· |
establishing and administering the base salaries and annual incentive awards of our executive officers, and |
|
· |
administering and making recommendations and awards under our equity incentive plans. |
The Compensation Committee regularly reviews the
compensation paid to our executive officers to ensure it is fair, reasonable, and competitive and is substantially tied to our performance.
The Compensation Committee evaluates, both subjectively and objectively, our financial performance, competitive position, future potential,
and the individual and group performance of the members of executive management. In such evaluation, the Compensation Committee reviews
data prepared by management and employs the business experience of the individual members of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation
Committee also utilizes the assistance of an independent compensation consultant, as described below under “—The Compensation
Review Process”.
2021 was another transformational year for the
Company. We made significant clinical progress in across our principal pipeline, including UltraCAR-T, AdenoVerse, and ActoBiotics, and
we completed a secondary offering and additional organizational steps to both continue the Company’s focus as a healthcare company
and strengthen the Company’s balance sheet. For 2021, after taking into account the overall position of the Company and with a focus
on retention and cash preservation, the Compensation Committee retained the existing base salaries for our executive officers, and made
annual incentive awards consisting of a mixture of cash and equity, but no long-term incentive awards were made to executive officers
for 2021.
Key Compensation Corporate Governance Practices
The Compensation Committee and the Board regularly
review evolving practices in executive compensation and corporate governance. We have adopted certain policies and practices that we believe
are consistent with industry best practices, as tailored to our specific business model and strategic direction. We have also strived
to adopt policies that will foster our growth and the continual realization of value to our shareholders by encouraging appropriate risk
taking and entrepreneurship in support of our unique and dynamic business model. The Compensation Committee and the Board also actively
scrutinize the anticipated effect of compensation practices on our ultimate goals.
What We Do:
|
· |
We ensure independence in establishing our executive compensation program. |
|
· |
We conduct an annual review and assessment of potential and existing risks arising from our compensation programs and policies. |
|
· |
The Compensation Committee engages an independent compensation consultant to advise on executive and director compensation matters. |
|
· |
We assess risks relating to our executive compensation program. |
|
· |
We use equity awards that vest over time and deliver greater value as our stock price increases. |
What We Do Not Do:
|
· |
We do not allow hedging of Company stock. |
|
· |
We do not provide excessive perquisites. |
|
· |
We do not provide for tax gross-ups, except for de minimis amounts related to short-term and long-term disability insurance premiums. |
|
· |
We do not allow repricing of stock options without shareholder approval. |
|
· |
We do not offer guaranteed bonuses. |
Our Compensation Philosophy
Our compensation philosophy is guided by the principle
of pay-for-performance. Our compensation programs are designed to support our business goals by rewarding achievement of short-term and
progress towards long-term objectives in a manner that links compensation of our executive officers with the value created for our shareholders.
While aligning our executive officers’ compensation with our short-term and long-term business goals, we aim to provide the incentives
needed to attract, motivate, reward, and retain our management talent, which is crucial to our long-term success.
Principles of Our Compensation Framework
Our executive compensation program is designed
to attract, retain, motivate, and reward talented individuals who will execute our business plan so that we can succeed in the competitive
and highly volatile business environment in which we operate. The Compensation Committee believes that the compensation program for our
executive officers should reward the achievement of our short-term and long-term objectives and that compensation should be related to
the value created for our shareholders. Furthermore, the compensation program should reflect competition and best practices in the marketplace.
The following objectives serve as the Compensation Committee’s guiding principles for all compensation decisions:
|
· |
Our executive compensation and benefits should attract, motivate, reward, and retain the management talent necessary to achieve our business objectives at compensation levels that are fair, equitable, and competitive with those of comparable companies. |
|
· |
Compensation should be set based on the leadership of each executive officer, which reflects skill sets, experience, and achievement, to create a competitive framework for talent acquisition and retention. |
|
· |
Compensation should be linked to individual and corporate performance by aligning our executive compensation program to company-wide performance, which is assessed in terms of financial and non-financial performance and creation of long-term value for our shareholders. |
In addition, the Compensation Committee believes
that the various elements of our compensation program effectively align compensation with performance measures that are directly related
to our financial goals and creation of shareholder value without encouraging executives to take unnecessary and excessive risks.
Developments in Executive Compensation for 2021
We review our executive compensation practices
annually to ensure that our plans and practices are supportive of our goals, remain competitive, and are in keeping with the best interests
of our shareholders. In 2021, the company continued a strategic process through which it focused its operations on its healthcare programs.
As part of this process, the Company undertook an extensive executive search process following Mr. Sterling’s resignation to identify
a permanent CFO with the qualifications to contribute to our growth, which ultimately resulted in the appointment of Mr. Thomasian as
CFO, effective October 18, 2021. Mr.
Thomasian
has been overseeing our corporate financial strategy and planning, and provides a critically important strategic perspective to our business
development and corporate financing initiatives.
In addition, as described in more detail under
“—The Compensation Review Process”, in June 2021, the Compensation Committee engaged Aon Radford as its new independent
compensation consultant to undertake a holistic review of the Company’s executive and director compensation programs and to advise
on the Company’s compensation programs. The Compensation Committee is working closely with Aon Radford to implement enhancements
to the Company’s compensation programs that further promote the Company’s pay for performance philosophy and drive long-term
shareholder value creation.
Elements of Our Compensation Program
The Compensation Committee has a mix of compensation
components that it utilizes, with the intent to make each component of total direct compensation competitive while also linking compensation
to individual and corporate performance and encouraging stock ownership by our executive officers. The table below describes each compensatory
element in our program and briefly explains how it promotes our objectives. We believe the combination of these elements provides an appropriate
balance of rewards, incentives, and benefits to our executives and enables us to meet our desired compensation objectives, strengthen
our ability to attract and retain highly qualified individuals, and to appropriately link pay to performance.
Element
of
Compensation |
Description |
How This
Element
Promotes Our Objectives |
|
Annual Compensation |
|
Base Salary |
Fixed annual compensation that is certain in payment and provides continuous income. |
Aids in both recruitment and retention; designed to be competitive in the marketplace. |
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Awards |
Performance-based compensation for achieving goals and objectives. |
Motivates and rewards achievement of annual corporate objectives by providing at-risk comprehensive pay opportunities linked to performance. |
|
|
|
Long-Term Compensation |
|
Equity Incentive Awards |
Generally, grants of options and/or RSUs that are part of our long-term
incentive program; time-based vesting, generally over four years. However, after taking into account the overall position of
the Company during the business transitions made during the year, the Compensation Committee did not grant long-term incentive awards
for 2021.
In early 2022, the Compensation Committee determined that it would
be appropriate to grant stock options for 2022, while it continues to evaluate appropriate long-term incentives for the Company’s
executives.
|
Promotes retention, increases long-term equity ownership, and aligns executive and long-term shareholder interests by linking a portion of their compensation to changes in company stock price. |
Element
of
Compensation |
Description |
How This
Element
Promotes Our Objectives |
Other Compensation |
|
Post-Termination
Payments and Benefits |
Payments and benefits upon termination of an executive’s employment in specified circumstances, such as termination other than for cause, resignation for good reason, retirement, death, disability, or a change in control, as described in greater detail herein. |
Provides assurance of financial security, which is desirable in lateral recruiting and executive retention and permits objective evaluation by executives of potential changes to our strategy and structure. |
|
|
|
Other Benefits |
Executives participate in employee benefit plans generally available to our employees. |
Fair and competitive programs to provide for the health and well-being of executives and their families. |
We do not provide our executives with any meaningful
perquisites that are not provided to employees generally. We also do not have any deferred compensation programs or retirement programs
other than our 401(k) Plan that is generally available to all employees. We enroll all eligible employees, other than our Executive Chairman,
in the same health, dental, and life and disability insurance programs.
Base Salary
General
Base salary levels for our executive officers
with the exception of our CEO are recommended to the Compensation Committee by our CEO and are subject to approval by the Compensation
Committee and the Board. In setting the base salary level for each executive officer (other than our CEO), the Compensation Committee
generally considers the executive officer’s experience level, demonstrated capabilities, time and placement in position, our geographic
region, individual performance, and potential future contributions to our Company. In addition, the Compensation Committee may consider
executive compensation data for the industry as a whole, including data from similarly situated companies. Base salaries are reviewed
annually by the Compensation Committee. When making decisions to adjust executive salaries, the Compensation Committee will also consider
our overall financial performance in addition to the factors identified above. No particular weight is assigned to any one factor. Taking
into account the overall position of the Company, the Compensation Committee determined not to make any changes to base salary for our
named executive officers in 2021.
The following table sets forth the 2021 annualized
base salaries for each of our NEOs. In connection with their service as interim principal financial and accounting officers, no changes
were made to the base salaries provided to Messrs. Osborne and Lambert.
Name |
2021 Base Salary |
Dr. Helen Sabzevari |
$1,000,000 |
Harry Thomasian Jr. |
$440,000 |
Donald Lehr |
$575,000 |
Jeffrey Perez |
$500,000 |
Rick Sterling |
$515,000 |
D. Bradford Osborne |
$315,000 |
James Lambert |
$240,400 |
Annual Incentive Awards
General
Our NEOs are eligible to receive annual bonuses based on corporate
and individual performance achievement, as determined by the Compensation Committee following the completion of the applicable performance
year, and subject to the NEO’s continued employment through the applicable payment date. Each NEO is provided a discretionary annual
target bonus opportunity that is set as a percentage of base salary, except that Dr. Sabzevari’s employment agreement provides for
eligibility for an annual bonus of between 75% and 150% of Dr. Sabzevari’s annual base salary.
Following the end of the 2021 performance year,
the Compensation Committee reviewed the performance of the Company and Dr. Sabzevari, including a detailed accounting of the Company’s
achievements in the areas of research and development, business development, and corporate operations. They discussed these accomplishments
with Dr. Sabzevari and, subsequently, with members of the Board and the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant.
Based on the significant accomplishments of the Company under Dr. Sabzevari’s leadership, the Compensation Committee recommended
to the Board the approval of a performance bonus in an aggregate amount equal to 150% of Dr. Sabzevari’s base salary. The Compensation
Committee also approved Dr. Sabzevari’s incentive bonus to be paid 50% in cash and 50% in shares of the Company’s common stock.
Accordingly, Dr. Sabzevari received a cash bonus in the amount of $750,000 and 340,909 RSUs granted on March 18, 2022 that will become
100% vested subject to continued employment through May 12, 2022.
The Compensation Committee utilized a similar
approach in considering the annual bonuses for the other named executive officers. In addition to considering the Company’s achievements,
they also took under advisement the recommendations of Dr. Sabzevari and the guidance of the compensation consultants. Based on these
considerations, the Compensation Committee recommended the following performance bonuses for each of Messrs. Thomasian, Perez and Lehr,
each of which was paid in the form of both cash and RSUs, with 50% paid in cash and 50% granted in RSUs based on the grant date fair market
value of the Company’s shares, with the value of any partial shares paid in cash as reflected in the table below. The RSU grants
to Messrs. Thomasian, Perez and Lehr were made on March 18, 2022 and will become 100% vested subject to continued employment though May
16, 2022.
Name |
Annual Target Bonus (% of Base Salary) |
Total Value of Target Bonus ($) |
Total Value of Actual Bonus ($) |
Actual Cash Payment ($) |
RSUs Granted (#) |
Harry Thomasian Jr. |
40% |
$35,681 (1) |
$35,681 |
$17,842 |
8,109 |
Jeffrey Perez |
40% |
200,000 |
140,000 |
70,000 |
22,697 |
Donald P. Lehr |
40% |
230,000 |
161,000 |
80,502 |
26,102 |
(1) Represents Mr. Thomasian’s target
bonus prorated from his employment date to the end of the year. His annualized target bonus (without proration) was $176,000.
Messrs. Sterling, Osborne and Lambert did not
receive annual performance bonuses for the year 2021, as they were not employed by the Company on the date that bonuses were paid.
Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards
Our primary objectives in granting long-term equity
incentive awards are to encourage significant ownership of our common stock by management and to provide long-term financial incentives
linked directly to our long-term performance. The Compensation Committee believes that significant ownership of our common stock by senior
management helps to align the interests of management and the shareholders. However, after taking into account the overall position of
the Company during the business transitions made during the year, the Compensation Committee did not make grants of long-term incentive
awards to its executives for 2021, except as noted below.
In connection with the annual long-term incentive
compensation program for non-executives, and in connection with the commencement of Mr. Thomasian’s employment in October 2021 and
pursuant to the terms of his offer of employment, stock options were granted to Mr. Thomasian, as set forth in the following table. In
addition, Messrs. Osborne and Lambert were awarded incentive grants in 2021 as follows:
Name |
Grant Date |
Number of Stock Options |
Vesting Schedule |
D. Bradford Osborne |
4/21/2021 |
30,000 |
Equal annual installments over 4 years from the grant date |
James Lambert |
4/21/2021 |
10,000 |
Harry Thomasian Jr. |
10/18/2021 |
180,000 |
In addition, in early 2022, the Compensation Committee
approved grants of stock options to Dr. Sabzevari and Messrs. Thomasian, Lehr and Perez, each of which vests in equal annual installments
over four years from the grant date.
Although we do not currently have a formal policy
with respect to the grant of equity incentive awards to our executive officers, or any formal equity ownership guidelines applicable to
them, we believe that equity grants provide our executives with a strong link to our long-term performance, create an ownership culture,
and help to align the ownership interests of our executives and our shareholders. The Compensation Committee continues to work closely
with its independent compensation consultant to review and evaluate the Company’s approach to long-term equity incentive compensation
for its executive officers in a manner that promotes long-term shareholder interests. The Compensation Committee believes that broad and
significant employee ownership of our common stock effectively motivates the building of shareholder wealth.
With the exception of significant promotions and
new hires, equity grants, when awarded, have generally been awarded toward the beginning of the fiscal year. The Compensation Committee
selects this timing because it enables us to consider our prior year performance and the participants’ and our expectations for
the next performance period.
Other Benefits
The Compensation Committee believes employee benefits
are an essential component of our competitive total compensation package. These benefits are designed to attract and retain our employees.
The executive officers may participate in, and we make contributions on their behalf to, the same benefit plans that are provided to all
of our eligible employees, which include medical, health and dental insurance, long-term disability insurance, accidental death and disability
insurance, and our 401(k) Plan. As part of the 401(k) Plan, we generally match 100% of the first 3% of compensation contributed by the
employee into the 401(k) Plan subject to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and our 401(k) Plan limits.
We have disclosed all company matches for our named executive officers in the column labeled
“All
Other Compensation,” in the Summary Compensation Table herein, and separately disclosed each amount in the All Other Compensation
Table for 2021 herein.
Employment Agreement with Dr. Sabzevari
In connection with her appointment to the position
of President and CEO in January 2020, we entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Sabzevari (the “CEO Employment Agreement”).
The term under the CEO Employment Agreement commenced on January 1, 2020 and continues until terminated in accordance with the CEO Employment
Agreement.
Dr. Sabzevari’s initial annual base salary
under the CEO Employment Agreement is $1,000,000. On January 5, 2020 (the “Grant Date”), pursuant to the terms of the CEO
Employment Agreement, Dr. Sabzevari received a grant of (i) restricted stock units in the amount of 500,000 shares of Precigen common
stock, which vested on the first anniversary of the Grant Date (the “RSU Grant”), (ii) incentive stock options to purchase
up to 1,500,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $5.95 (the “FMV”), 50% of which vested on the first anniversary
of the Grant Date and the remaining 50% of which vest in equal installments on each of the next three anniversaries of the Grant Date
(together with the RSU Grant, the “CEO Initial Equity Grants”), (iii) incentive stock options to purchase up to 1,500,000
shares of Precigen common stock with an exercise price of twice the FMV, and (iv) incentive stock options to purchase up to 1,500,000
shares of Precigen common stock with an exercise price of three times the FMV (together with (iii), the “CEO Performance Equity
Grants”). Each of the CEO Performance Equity Grants vest in four equal annual installments on each of the first four anniversaries
of the Grant Date.
The CEO Employment Agreement also provides for
eligibility for an annual bonus of between 75% and 150% of Dr. Sabzevari’s annual base salary, contingent upon continuous employment
by us and Dr. Sabzevari’s performance during the bonus period and through the date on which the bonus is paid, as determined in
the sole discretion of the Board. Pursuant to the CEO Employment Agreement, Dr. Sabzevari will be entitled to participate in all employee
benefit plans that are generally made available to senior Precigen exempt executives.
Severance provisions in the CEO Employment Agreement
are further discussed below in the section “Potential Payments upon Termination or a Change in Control.”
The Compensation Review Process
Process for Approval of Compensation Measures
Management makes a recommendation to the Compensation
Committee and the Board regarding key financial goals, operational goals, and performance measures that will guide us for the relevant
fiscal year. The Compensation Committee, together with the Board, reviews these recommendations and modifies them as the Board deems appropriate
and the revised goals and performance objectives become the compensation measures for the executive officers. For 2022, the Compensation
Committee intends to update the Company’s executive compensation programs to enhance and promote its pay for performance philosophy.
Role of the Compensation Committee and Management
Governance of our compensation program is the
responsibility of the Compensation Committee, which consists solely of independent directors. At the direction of the Compensation Committee,
our CEO prepares compensation recommendations regarding the compensation of each of our executive officers, other than for the CEO, and
presents those recommendations to the Compensation Committee for approval. The Compensation Committee evaluates the overall performance
of the executive officers based on our achievement of corporate performance objectives and goals and individual performance. The Compensation
Committee then reviews and takes into account all elements of executive compensation in setting policies and determining compensation
amounts. The Compensation Committee does not delegate authority to its outside advisor or to other parties.
Role of Compensation Consultants
As discussed above, the Compensation Committee
is authorized to retain experts, consultants, and other advisors to aid in the discharge of its duties.
From August 2014 through June 2021, the Compensation
Committee had engaged F. Daniel Siciliano as its outside compensation consultant. Mr. Siciliano is the co-founder of Stanford’s
Arthur and Toni Rembe Rock Center for Corporate Governance, a fellow and the immediate past Faculty Director and Professor of the Practice
at Stanford Law School. Mr. Siciliano is a noted authority on matters related to executive compensation and corporate governance. Mr.
Siciliano was retained to (i) review our historical compensation practices, (ii) advise the Compensation Committee on compensation standards
and trends, (iii) assist in the implementation of compensation policies and programs, and (iv) review recommendations from management
on compensation matters. All work completed by Mr. Siciliano was subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Siciliano’s
role included providing independent advice and counsel to the Compensation Committee.
In June 2021, the Compensation Committee engaged
Aon Consulting (“Aon”) as its independent compensation consultant to aid the Compensation Committee in its annual review of
the Company’s executive compensation practices for continuing appropriateness and reasonableness and to make recommendations regarding
executive officer compensation levels and structures. In reviewing the Company’s executive compensation practices, the Compensation
Committee also considers other sources to evaluate external market, industry and peer-company practices. Aon has no other business relationship
with us and receives no payments from us other than fees for services to the Compensation Committee.
In retaining Mr. Siciliano and Aon, the Compensation
Committee separately considered the six factors set forth in Section 10C-1(b)(4)(i) through (vi) of the Exchange Act and the listing standards
of Nasdaq, based on such consideration, determined that neither the engagement of Mr. Siciliano nor Aon raised any conflicts of interest.
Use of Peer Group
In and prior to 2021, we did not undertake any
formal peer group analysis of executive compensation or target compensation to specific benchmarks against any peer group companies because,
due to the unique and rapidly evolving nature of our business, no practical robust cohort of peer companies was available to use as a
formal peer group for our Company.
However, in June 2021, the Compensation Committee
engaged Aon to assist in the analysis of the Company’s peer group to align with governance and market best practices in preparation
for the 2022 compensation review cycle. In that capacity, Aon provided the Compensation Committee with a peer group analysis and made
recommendations to the Compensation Committee in structuring the compensation program for the CEO and other executive officers.
The peer analysis conducted by Aon considered
our peer companies to be U.S. based pre-commercial bio/pharma companies predominantly in Phase II/III clinical trials, and companies specializing
in oncology, gene therapy, vaccine development and/or a diverse portfolio with one or more of the specialties. The peer group that resulted
from this screening method consisted of 22 potential companies as the following:
Company Name |
Agenus |
Allogene Therapeutics |
Atara Biotherapeutics |
Caribou Biosciences, Inc.
|
CytomX Therapeutics
|
Fate Therapeutics
|
Gritstone bio
|
IDEAYA Biosciences
|
Inovio Pharmaceuticals
|
Iovance Biotherapeutics
|
Legend Biotech
|
Molecular Templates
|
NGM Biopharmaceuticals
|
Poseida Therapeutics
|
Precision BioSciences
|
REGENXBIO
|
Revolution Medicines
|
Sana Biotechnology
|
Sorrento Therapeutics
|
TCR2 Therapeutics
|
VBI Vaccines
|
Xencor
|
|
|
|
At the time the potential peer group was proposed
to the Compensation Committee, the peer group had the following median statistics:
Measure |
50th Percentile |
Precigen’s Position |
Market Capitalization |
$1.37 billion |
$1.38 billion (50th percentile) |
Revenues |
$36.0 million |
$97.9 million (92nd percentile) |
Annualized 3-Year TSR |
10% |
-22% (14th percentile) |
The Compensation Committee plans to continue to
monitor certain compensation practices at a variety of similarly situated or similarly structured companies with special attention to
the 2021 peer group analysis in assessing and making compensation decisions going forward.
Establishing Total Direct Remuneration
Total direct remuneration is the sum of base salary,
annual incentive awards, long-term equity incentive awards (if any), and other benefits. A major portion of each executive officer’s
remuneration is established by performance-based incentives, which require achievement of performance objectives and goals as a condition
to earning annual incentive awards, and long-term equity incentive awards, the value of which depends on our stock price upon vesting
or exercise. The at-risk portion of total direct remuneration provides increased pay for higher levels of corporate and/or business sector
performance.
In setting each executive officer’s total
direct remuneration opportunity, the Compensation Committee takes into account factors such as the responsibilities, experience, performance,
contributions, and service of the executive. We do not set total direct remuneration or the component parts at levels to achieve a mathematically
precise market position. In determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee reviews all components of each executive officer’s
total compensation, including retirement benefits and the costs of any perquisites received, to ensure such compensation meets the goals
of the program. As a part of this review, the Compensation Committee considers corporate performance and the recommendations of senior
management. The Compensation Committee also takes into consideration individual and overall company operating performance to ensure executive
compensation reflects past performance as well as future potential and, we believe, adequately differentiates among employees, based on
the scope and complexity of the employee’s job position, individual performance and experience and our ability to pay. The Compensation
Committee reviews annually each executive officer’s performance prior to considering changes in compensation. The individual performance
of each executive officer is evaluated in light of our overall performance approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board. The Compensation
Committee and the Board believe that the competitive environment, including for executive talent, is dynamic and evolving. For this reason,
while the Compensation Committee believes the total compensation for each of the executive officers is reasonable and appropriate, the
Compensation Committee continues to actively consider methods to further improve the effectiveness of our approach to executive compensation.
Consideration of Say-on-Pay Vote Results
The Board has determined to provide our shareholders
the opportunity to vote each year to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in our
Proxy Statement (“say-on-pay”). As an advisory vote, the vote on executive compensation is non-binding on the Board and should
not be construed as (i) overruling a decision by the Board, (ii) creating or implying any change to our fiduciary duties, or (iii) creating
or implying any additional fiduciary duties for the Board. Although the
vote is
non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders, and consider our shareholders’ views
when making executive compensation decisions, as they deem appropriate.
At our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we
held a non-binding shareholder say-on-pay vote as well as a non-binding shareholder say-on-pay frequency vote on executive compensation.
Our shareholders approved our 2021 executive compensation proposal, with 81.1% of the shares that were cast on the proposal voted in favor
of the say-on-pay resolution. We did not make any significant changes in our policies or programs in response to this vote. However, we
will continue to consider the outcome of the say-on-pay vote for future compensation decisions for our executive officers. In addition,
our shareholders approved the option of “one year” for the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.
Other Executive Compensation Practices
Anti-Hedging Policy
To ensure alignment of the interests of our shareholders,
directors and executive officers, our Insider Trading Policy does not permit directors, officers, or employees to engage in short-term
or speculative transactions involving our securities, including short sales, publicly traded options, or hedging of our securities.
Compensation Recovery Policies
It is the Board’s policy that in the event
the Board determines that a significant restatement or correction of our financial results or other metrics is required for the prior
fiscal year for which audited financial statements have been completed, and, had the results or metrics been properly calculated initially,
our officers would have received less compensation, the Board has the authority to obtain reimbursement of any portion of any performance
based compensation paid or awarded, whether cash or equity based, to the officers and to other employees responsible for accounting
errors resulting in the restatement or correction that is greater than would have been paid or awarded calculated based upon the restated
or corrected financial results or metrics. Further, it is the policy of the Board to seek recoupment in all instances where Section 304
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to seek recoupment.
United States Federal Income Tax Limits on Deductibility
Prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017, a public corporation’s covered employees included
its CEO and three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than the chief financial officer), and certain “qualified
performance-based compensation” was excluded from the $1 million deduction limit. The TCJA made certain changes to Section 162(m)
of the Code, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, including, among others, expanding the definition of “covered
employee” to include the chief financial officer and repealing the qualified performance-based compensation exception, subject to
a transition rule for remuneration provided pursuant to a written binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017, and which was not modified
in any material respect on or after that date. Our policy is to qualify compensation paid to our executive officers for deductibility
for federal income tax purposes to the extent feasible. However, to retain highly skilled executives and remain competitive with other
employers, the Compensation Committee may authorize compensation that would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code or otherwise
if it determines that such compensation is in the best interests of us and our shareholders.
Compensation
and Human Capital Management Committee Report
The Compensation and Human Capital Management
Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management
and, based on such review and discussion, the Compensation and Human Capital Management Committee recommended to the Board that it be
included in this Proxy Statement.
THE COMPENSATION AND HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
Compensation Risk Assessment
As part of its oversight of our executive compensation
program, the Compensation Committee considers the impact of our executive compensation program, and the incentives created by the compensation
awards that it administers, on our risk profile. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews our compensation policies and procedures,
including the incentives that they create and factors that may reduce the likelihood of excessive risk-taking, to determine whether they
present a significant risk to us. The Compensation Committee concluded that our compensation programs are designed with the appropriate
balance of risk and reward in relation to our overall business strategy and that the balance of compensation elements discourages excessive
risk taking. The Compensation Committee, therefore, determined that the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for
employees are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider compensation
risk implications while deliberating the design of our executive compensation programs. In its discussions, the Compensation Committee
considered the attributes of our programs, including:
|
· |
appropriate pay philosophy in light of our business model; |
|
· |
balance with respect to the mix of cash and equity compensation, and measures of performance against both annual and multiyear standards; |
|
· |
long-term incentives linked to stock price performance; |
|
· |
long-term incentives generally have multiyear vesting to ensure a long-term focus and appropriate balance against short-term goals; |
|
· |
independent Compensation Committee oversight, with Compensation Committee discretion to reduce incentives based on subjective evaluation of individual performance; and |
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the compensation
paid to or accrued by our named executive officers during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary
($) |
|
Bonus
(1)($) |
|
Stock Awards
(2)($) |
|
Option Awards
(3)($) |
|
All Other
Compensation(4)($) |
|
Total
($) |
Helen Sabzevari
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2021 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
750,002 |
|
|
|
749,998 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
$16,170 |
|
|
|
2,516,168 |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
750,002 |
|
|
|
4,115,000 |
|
|
|
14,529,600 |
|
|
|
15,314 |
|
|
|
20,409,916 |
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
950,017 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15,090 |
|
|
|
1,465,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harry Thomasian Jr.(5)
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2021 |
|
|
91,667 |
|
|
|
17,842 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
618,750 |
|
|
|
4,415 |
|
|
|
732,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald P. Lehr
Chief Legal Officer
|
|
2021 |
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
|
80,502 |
|
|
|
201,246 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
35,262 |
|
|
|
892,011 |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
|
201,254 |
|
|
|
570,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
31,957 |
|
|
|
1,378,211 |
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
950,006 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
31,733 |
|
|
|
1,556,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Perez
Senior Vice President, IP Affairs
|
|
2021 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
174,994 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
33,542 |
|
|
|
778,536 |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
175,006 |
|
|
|
570,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30,716 |
|
|
|
1,275,722 |
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
950,006 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30,492 |
|
|
|
1,480,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rick Sterling(6)
Former Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2021 |
|
|
132,712 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
382,285 |
|
|
|
514,996 |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
515,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
570,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
32,064 |
|
|
|
1,117,064 |
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
515,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
950,006 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
31,840 |
|
|
|
1,496,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Osborne(7)
Former Interim CFO and Interim Principal Accounting Officer
|
|
2021 |
|
|
140,740 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
44,095 |
|
|
|
179,868 |
|
|
|
36,575 |
|
|
|
401,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James V. Lambert(8)
Former Interim CFO and Interim Principal Accounting Officer
|
|
2021 |
|
|
240,400 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
12,498 |
|
|
|
59,956 |
|
|
|
33,769 |
|
|
|
346,623 |
|
____________________
|
(1) |
Represents discretionary cash bonuses paid in the year following the applicable year’s
service period. |
|
(2) |
Represents the grant date fair value computed by us for financial reporting purposes, computed in
accordance with ASC Topic 718. For a full description of the assumptions we use in computing these amounts, see Note 2 to our
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021, which is included in our 2021 Annual Report. This column
does not include for 2021 the grant date fair value of RSUs granted as part of the incentive award for performance in 2021 because
the awards were granted in 2022. However, it does include for 2021, 2020 and 2019 the grant date fair value of RSUs granted as part
of the incentive award for performance in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
|
(3) |
Represents the grant date fair value computed by us for financial reporting purposes, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For a full description of the assumptions we use in computing these amounts, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021, which is included in our 2021 Annual Report. The actual value a named executive officer may receive depends on market prices and there can be no assurance that the amounts reflected in the Option Awards column will actually be realized. No gain to a named executive officer is possible without an appreciation in stock value after the date of grant. |
|
(4) |
The amounts in this column are further detailed in the “All Other Compensation Table for 2021.” |
|
(5) |
Mr. Thomasian commenced his employment with us as Chief Financial Officer on October 18, 2021. Accordingly, no information is displayed for 2020 or 2019.
|
|
(6) |
Mr. Sterling ceased serving as Chief Financial Officer, effective April 2, 2021.
|
|
(7) |
Mr. Osborne served as interim CFO and interim principal accounting officer from April 2 to June 10, 2021, and was not a named executive officer prior to 2021. Accordingly, no information is displayed for 2020 or 2019.
|
|
(8) |
Mr. Lambert served as interim CFO and interim principal accounting officer from June 10 to October 18, 2021, and was not a named executive officer prior to 2021. Accordingly, no information is displayed for 2020 or 2019. |
All
Other Compensation Table for 2021
The table below reflects the types and dollar
amounts of perquisites, additional compensation, and other personal benefits provided to the named executive officers during 2021. For
purposes of computing the dollar amounts of the items listed below, we used the actual out-of-pocket costs to us of providing the perquisite
or other personal benefit to the named executive officer. The named executive officers paid any taxes associated with these benefits without
reimbursement from us.
Name |
|
Company-Paid Welfare and Life Benefits Premiums
($) |
|
401(k) Plan Company Contributions
($) |
|
|
Termination
Payments
($)
|
|
Total
($) |
Helen Sabzevari |
|
|
7,470 |
|
|
|
8,700 |
|
|
|
— |
|
16,170 |
|
Harry Thomasian Jr. |
|
|
4,415 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
4,415 |
|
Donald P. Lehr |
|
|
26,562 |
|
|
|
8,700 |
|
|
|
— |
|
35,262 |
|
Jeffrey Perez |
|
|
24,842 |
|
|
|
8,700 |
|
|
|
— |
|
33,542 |
|
Rick Sterling |
|
|
26,881 |
|
|
|
5,467 |
|
|
|
349,937 |
(1) |
382,285 |
|
Brad Osborne |
|
|
3,645 |
|
|
|
8,700 |
|
|
|
24,230 |
(1) |
36,575 |
|
James V. Lambert |
|
|
26,182 |
|
|
|
7,587 |
|
|
|
— |
|
33,769 |
|
____________________
|
(1) |
For Mr. Sterling, the amounts represent severance payments and benefits of (i) 18 months of base salary and (ii) reimbursement for 18 months of expected COBRA premiums, as well as a payment in respect of accrued and unused paid time off. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control” on Page 53 for additional details. For Mr. Osborne, the amounts represent a payment in respect of accrued and unused paid time off. |
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards for 2021
The following table presents information regarding
grants of plan-based awards to the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
Name |
|
Grant Date |
|
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) |
|
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) |
|
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Share) |
|
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards($)(1) |
Helen Sabzevari |
|
3/25/2021 |
|
|
97,276 |
(2) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
749,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Harry Thomasian Jr. |
|
10/18/2021 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
180,000 |
(3) |
|
|
4.72 |
|
|
|
618,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald P. Lehr |
|
3/25/2021 |
|
|
26,102 |
(2) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
201,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Perez |
|
3/25/2021 |
|
|
22,697 |
(2) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
174,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rick Sterling |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Osborne |
|
3/19/2021 |
|
|
5,384 |
(2) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
44,095 |
|
|
|
4/21/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
8.17 |
|
|
|
179,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James V. Lambert |
|
3/19/2021 |
|
|
1,526 |
(2) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
12,498 |
|
|
|
4/21/2021 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
8.17 |
|
|
|
59,956 |
|
____________________
|
(1) |
Represents the grant date fair value of the equity awards determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718. |
|
(2) |
Award was granted for performance in 2020. |
|
(3) |
Mr. Thomasian received a stock option grant in the amount set forth in the table above pursuant to his employment offer letter. |
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2021 Fiscal Year End
The following table sets forth specified information
concerning unexercised stock options and unvested RSUs held by each of the named executive officers as of December 31, 2021. Outstanding
equity awards held by Messrs. Sterling and Osborne were forfeited in connection with their terminations of employment, and no such awards
were outstanding at year-end.
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
Name |
|
Grant Date |
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options: Exercisable |
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options: Unexercisable(1) |
|
Option
Exercise Price ($) |
|
Option
Expiration Date |
|
Number
of Shares or Units of Stock Not Vested (#)(1) |
|
Market
Value of Shares or Units of Stock Not Vested ($) |
Helen Sabzevari |
|
7/17/2017 |
|
150,000 |
|
— |
|
28.23 |
|
7/17/2027 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
1/2/2018 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
9,765 |
|
36,228 |
|
|
1/4/2019 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
6,887 |
|
25,551 |
|
|
1/25/2019 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
28,445 |
|
105,531 |
|
|
1/5/2020 |
|
750,000 |
|
750,000 |
|
5.95 |
|
1/5/2030 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
1/5/2020 |
|
375,000 |
|
1,125,000 |
|
11.90 |
|
1/5/2030 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
1/5/2020 |
|
375,000 |
|
1,125,000 |
|
17.85 |
|
1/5/2030 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harry Thomasian Jr. |
|
10/18/2021 |
|
— |
|
180,000 |
|
4.72 |
|
10/18/2031 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald P. Lehr |
|
3/20/2014 |
|
207,855 |
|
— |
|
29.56 |
|
3/20/2024 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
2/2/2017 |
|
225,000 |
|
— |
|
20.94 |
|
2/2/2027 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
1/2/2018 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
9,765 |
|
36,228 |
|
|
1/4/2019 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
37,878 |
|
140,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Perez |
|
8/25/2014 |
|
202,733 |
|
— |
|
19.52 |
|
8/25/2024 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
2/2/2017 |
|
225,000 |
|
— |
|
20.94 |
|
2/02/2027 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
1/2/2018 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
9,765 |
|
36,228 |
|
|
1/4/2019 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
37,878 |
|
140,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James V. Lambert (2) |
|
6/6/2017 |
|
10,000 |
|
— |
|
22.56 |
|
4/21/2027 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
1/2/2018 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
2,170 |
|
8,015 |
|
|
4/21/2021 |
|
— |
|
10,000 |
|
8.17 |
|
4/21/2031 |
|
— |
|
— |
____________________
|
(1) |
Each award vests in four equal annual installments beginning on the anniversary of the grant date.
|
|
(2) |
Upon Mr. Lambert’s resignation from the Company effective February 18, 2022, all of Mr.
Lambert’s unvested options were forfeited. Under the Precigen, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Omnibus Incentive
Plan, he has one year from the date of his termination to exercise his vested options. His restricted stock units vested in full
prior to his resignation. |
Stock
Awards Vested for 2021
The following table sets forth specified information
concerning stock vesting for each of the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
Name |
|
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting (#) |
|
|
|
Value Realized on
Vesting ($)(1) |
|
Helen Sabzevari |
|
|
9,766 |
|
|
|
99,613 |
|
|
|
|
3,444 |
|
|
|
37,712 |
|
|
|
|
14,223 |
|
|
|
155,742 |
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
4,785,000 |
|
|
|
|
97,276 |
|
|
|
871,593 |
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harry Thomasian Jr. |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald P. Lehr |
|
|
9,766 |
|
|
|
99,613 |
|
|
|
|
18,940 |
|
|
|
207,393 |
|
|
|
|
26,102 |
|
|
|
176,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Perez |
|
|
9,766 |
|
|
|
99,613 |
|
|
|
|
18,940 |
|
|
|
207,393 |
|
|
|
|
22,697 |
|
|
|
157,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rick Sterling |
|
|
9,766 |
|
|
|
99,613 |
|
|
|
|
18,940 |
|
|
|
207,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Osborne |
|
|
4,340 |
|
|
|
44,268 |
|
|
|
|
6,887 |
|
|
|
75,413 |
|
|
|
|
5,384 |
|
|
|
44,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James V. Lambert |
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
22,134 |
|
|
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
12,498 |
|
____________________
|
(1) |
The amounts in the “Value Realized on Vesting” column are calculated based on the closing market price per share of our common stock on the date of vesting. This calculation differs from the grant date fair value of the equity awards determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718. |
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control
Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers
Messrs. Lehr and Perez are each party to
an employment agreement with the Company entered into in April 2019 that provide for certain severance rights upon termination
“without Cause” or resignation by the executive officer for “Good Reason.” Pursuant to the terms of these
employment agreements, subject to the execution of a release of claims, the named executive officer would be entitled to receive (i)
payment equivalent to 18 months of his base pay, and (ii) the named executive officer’s expected cost of COBRA premiums for
continued medical coverage for up to 18 months.
“Cause” under these employment agreements
means (i) material failure to observe and comply with any of our material written policies to our satisfaction; (ii) continued failure
to substantially perform material duties; (iii) uncured willful failure to carry out, or comply with, in any material respect, any lawful
and reasonable written directive; (iv) commission of any act or omission that results in, or that may reasonably be expected to result
in, a conviction, plea of no contest or imposition of unadjudicated probation for any felony or any crime involving moral turpitude; (v)
the employee’s incarceration; (vi) commission of any act of dishonesty, illegal conduct, fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation,
material misconduct, or breach of fiduciary duty either against us or our affiliates or that is reasonably expected to be materially injurious
to us or our affiliates; or (vii) uncured material or willful breach of any agreement with us.
“Good Reason” under these employment
agreements means (i) a material diminution in the employee’s authority, duties or responsibilities; (ii) a material reduction in
the employee’s base salary (other than a general reduction in compensation applying to other similarly situated employees); or (iii)
the relocation of the primary office from which the employee is required to work to a location more than 50 miles from the current office
location where the employee primarily works, which relocation increases the employee’s one-way commute.
In connection with his termination of
employment, Mr. Sterling received the same payments and benefits as described above for Messrs. Lehr and Perez and under the
“Potential Payments upon Termination or a Change in Control” table below under the terms of his employment agreement
with the Company. Mr. Thomasian’s employment arrangements do not provide for any termination payments or benefits.
Employment Agreement with Dr. Sabzevari
Pursuant to the CEO Employment Agreement, in the
event Dr. Sabzevari’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by Dr. Sabzevari for Good Reason, subject to her
execution of a release of claims, Dr. Sabzevari would be eligible to receive (i) an amount equal to 18 months of her then-current base
annual salary (or, in the event of a material reduction of Dr. Sabzevari’s base salary giving rise to Good Reason, her pre-reduction
base salary), (ii) a pro rata portion of her maximum annual performance bonus for the calendar year of her termination plus any annual
bonus for the calendar year prior to the date of her termination of employment that would have been earned but for her termination date
occurring prior to the date of payment of such bonus, (iii) full acceleration of any unvested portion of the Initial Equity Grants, (iv)
full acceleration of any unvested portion of the Performance Equity Grants in the event such termination occurs within 12 months of a
Change in Control, as defined our Amended and Restated 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) (see “Equity Award
Provisions” below), and (v) if elected, payment or reimbursement for COBRA healthcare continuation coverage for up to 18 months
following the termination date.
Regardless of the reason of termination, under
the CEO Employment Agreement Dr. Sabzevari will be entitled to receive (i) any earned, but unpaid, base salary through the date of termination,
(ii) a cash payout of accrued but unused vacation, and (iii) any amounts owed for reimbursement of expenses pursuant to applicable Precigen
reimbursement policies.
“Cause” under CEO Employment Agreement
has generally the same meaning as “Cause” in the employment agreements with the other named executive officers, except that
a continued failure to substantially perform material duties does not constitute cause and that only material acts of dishonesty, illegal
conduct, fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation, material misconduct, or breach of fiduciary duty constitute Cause.
“Good Reason” under Dr. Sabzevari’s
Employment Agreement has generally the same meaning as “Good Reason” in the employment agreements with the other named executive
officers, except that a reduction in her base salary of more than 5%, other than a general reduction for similarly situated employees
not to exceed 10%, constitutes “Good Reason.”
Equity Award Provisions
To ensure that we will have the continued dedicated
service of certain executives, including some of our named executive officers, notwithstanding the possibility, threat, or occurrence
of a Change in Control, our stock option and RSU award agreements with our named executive officers contain change in control provisions.
Specifically, these agreements provide that in the event a Change in Control occurs and no provision is made for the continuance, assumption
or substitution of the option award by the Company or its successor in connection with the Change in Control, then the award will vest
in full, to the extent not already vested, on the earlier of the date of the Change in Control or the date the award is to be terminated
in connection with the Change in Control, provided the executive has remained continuously employed by the Company or any affiliate from
the grant date until such time.
The Compensation Committee believes that the Change
in Control provisions in our 2013 Plan and our stock option awards serve the best interests of our Company and our shareholders by ensuring
that if a Change in Control is ever under consideration, our executives are able to perform their duties and responsibilities and advise
the Board about the potential transaction in the best interests of shareholders, without being unduly influenced by the distracting uncertainty
and risk associated with a Change in Control, such as fear of the economic consequences of losing their equity awards as a result of a
Change in Control.
A “Change in Control” is defined in
the 2013 Plan to mean generally the occurrence of any of the following events:
|
(a) |
the accumulation in any number of related or unrelated transactions by any person of beneficial ownership (as such term is used in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of more than 50% of the combined voting power of our voting stock; provided that for purposes of this subsection (a), a Change in Control will not be deemed to have occurred if the accumulation of more than 50% of the voting power of our voting stock results from any acquisition of voting stock (i) directly from the Company that is approved by the Incumbent Board (as defined in the 2013 Plan), (ii) by the Company, (iii) by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by us or any affiliate, or (iv) by any person pursuant to a merger, consolidation, reorganization or other transaction (a “Business Combination”) that would not cause a Change in Control under subsection (b), (c) or (d) below; |
|
(b) |
consummation of a Business Combination, unless, immediately following that Business Combination, (i) all or substantially all of the persons who were the beneficial owners of our voting stock immediately prior to that Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the then outstanding shares of common stock and more than 50% of the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the entity resulting from that Business Combination (including, without limitation, an entity that as a result of that Business Combination owns the Company or all or substantially all of our assets either directly or through one or more subsidiaries) in substantially the same proportions relative to each other as their ownership, immediately prior to that Business Combination, of our voting stock: |
|
(c) |
a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, except pursuant to a Business Combination that would not cause a Change in Control under subsection (b) above or (d) below; |
|
(d) |
approval by the shareholders of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company, except pursuant to a Business Combination that would not cause a Change in Control under subsection (b) and (c) above; |
|
(e) |
the acquisition by any person, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of our management and policies (i) through the ownership of securities which provide the holder with such power, excluding voting rights attendant with such securities, or (ii) by contract; provided that a Change in Control will not be deemed to have occurred if such power was acquired (x) directly from the Company in a transaction approved by the Incumbent Board, (y) by an employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any affiliate or (z) by any person pursuant to a Business Combination that would not cause a Change in Control under subsections (b), (c) or (d) above; or |
|
(f) |
During any period of two consecutive years, the Incumbent Board ceases to constitute a majority of the Board. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a “Change
in Control” does not include any accumulation of beneficial ownership or any Business Combination pursuant to which more than 50%
of the beneficial ownership of the combined voting power of our voting stock is owned by (i) Randal J. Kirk, his spouse, his descendants
and the spouses of his descendants, (ii) trusts and other entities established generally for the benefit of Randal J. Kirk, his spouse,
his descendants and the spouses of his descendants, (iii) Third Security Staff 2001 LLC and any related funds, investors or entities,
and/or (iv) any entities established by any of the foregoing.
In addition, our stock option and RSU award agreements
with our named executive officers provide for the full vesting of the awards in the event of termination by reason of the named executive
officer’s death or disability.
Potential Payments
The following table shows the potential payments
upon termination without cause or for good reason by the executive officer, a change in control of the Company, incapacity or death for
the named executive officers based on agreements and plans in effect as of December 31, 2021. The amounts in this table are calculated
assuming the triggering event occurred on December 31, 2021 and all executives were paid in a lump sum payment.
With respect to Messrs. Sterling and Osborne,
each named executive officer received the amounts set forth under the terms of their agreements in place at the time of their employment
terminations. For Mr. Sterling, he received, subject to his execution of a release of claims, severance of (i) payment equivalent to 18
months of his base pay, and (ii) the expected cost of COBRA premiums for continued medical coverage for 18 months. Mr. Osborne was not
entitled to receive, and did not receive, any severance payments or benefits in connection with his termination of employment.
|
|
|
|
Potential Payments upon Termination or a Change in Control |
|
|
|
|
Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason (Prior to a Change in Control) ($) |
|
Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason (Within 12 Months of a Change in Control) ($) |
|
Change in Control (No Termination) (1) ($) |
|
Incapacity(2) ($) |
|
Death(3)
($) |
Helen Sabzevari |
|
Accelerated Equity |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
167,310 |
|
|
|
167,310 |
|
|
|
167,310 |
|
|
|
167,310 |
|
|
|
Severance Payment |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Prorated Bonus |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Other Compensation (PTO) |
|
|
95,683 |
|
|
|
95,683 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
95,683 |
|
|
|
95,683 |
|
|
|
Benefit Plans |
|
|
11,036 |
(4) |
|
|
11,036 |
(4) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
630,000 |
|
|
|
1,545,000 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,106,719 |
|
|
|
3,274,029 |
|
|
|
167,310 |
|
|
|
892,993 |
|
|
|
1,807,993 |
|
Harry Thomasian Jr. |
|
Accelerated Equity |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Severance Payment |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Other Compensation (PTO) |
|
|
10,585 |
|
|
|
10,585 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,585 |
|
|
|
10,585 |
|
|
|
Benefit Plans |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
630,000 |
|
|
|
1,425,000 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
10,585 |
|
|
|
10,585 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
640,585 |
|
|
|
1,435,585 |
|
Donald P. Lehr |
|
Accelerated Equity |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
176,756 |
|
|
|
176,756 |
|
|
|
176,756 |
|
|
|
Severance Payment |
|
|
862,500 |
|
|
|
862,500 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Other Compensation (PTO) |
|
|
55,288 |
|
|
|
55,288 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
55,288 |
|
|
|
55,288 |
|
|
|
Benefit Plans |
|
|
46,781 |
(4) |
|
|
46,781 |
(4) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
630,000 |
|
|
|
1,545,000 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
964,569 |
|
|
|
964,569 |
|
|
|
176,756 |
|
|
|
862,044 |
|
|
|
1,777,044 |
|
Jeffrey Perez |
|
Accelerated Equity |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
176,756 |
|
|
|
176,756 |
|
|
|
176,756 |
|
|
|
Severance Payment |
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Other Compensation (PTO) |
|
|
48,077 |
|
|
|
48,077 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
48,077 |
|
|
|
48,077 |
|
|
|
Benefit Plans |
|
|
41,556 |
(4) |
|
|
41,556 |
(4) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
630,000 |
|
|
|
1,545,000 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
839,633 |
|
|
|
839,633 |
|
|
|
176,756 |
|
|
|
854,832 |
|
|
|
1,769,832 |
|
James V. Lambert (5) |
|
Accelerated Equity |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,051 |
|
|
|
8,051 |
|
|
|
8,051 |
|
|
|
Severance Payment |
|
|
69,346 |
|
|
|
69,346 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Other Compensation (PTO) |
|
|
18,492 |
|
|
|
18,492 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
18,492 |
|
|
|
18,492 |
|
|
|
Benefit Plans |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
630,000 |
|
|
|
962,000 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
87,838 |
|
|
|
87,838 |
|
|
|
8,051 |
|
|
|
656,543 |
|
|
|
988,543 |
|
____________________
|
(1) |
In the event of a change in control, as described above, unvested stock options and RSUs vest immediately unless provision is made for the continuance, assumption, or substitution of the option award by the Company or its successor. For purposes of this table, we assume that no such provision has been made. This column reflects the value of the accelerated vesting, which is calculated (i) for stock options by multiplying the number of shares subject to accelerated vesting under outstanding stock options by the difference between $3.71 (which was the closing market price per share of our common stock on December 31, 2021, the last trading day of fiscal 2021) and the per-share exercise price of the applicable accelerated stock option and (ii) for RSUs by multiplying the number of shares subject to accelerated vesting under outstanding RSUs by $3.71. |
|
(2) |
The named executive officer would also be eligible for benefits payable under the long-term disability insurance policy maintained by the Company. |
|
(3) |
The named executive officer’s heirs would also be eligible for benefits under the life insurance policy maintained by the Company. |
|
(4) |
Includes the full premium cost of COBRA healthcare continuation coverage payable for 18 months following the executive’s termination, assuming that the executive does not become eligible to receive healthcare coverage from a subsequent employer or otherwise becomes ineligible for COBRA healthcare continuation coverage during this period. |
|
(5) |
Mr. Lambert terminated employment with us on February 18, 2022. In connection with his termination, he did not receive any severance payments or benefits and all his outstanding unvested equity awards were forfeited. |
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth certain information
as of December 31, 2021 with respect to securities that may be issued pursuant to outstanding awards granted under our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan (the “2008 Plan”), the 2013 Plan, and the 2019 Plan and authorized for issuance under the 2013 Plan and the 2019 Plan.
No new awards may be granted under the 2008 Plan. Each of these equity compensation plans was adopted with the approval of our shareholders.
Plan Category |
|
Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
|
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in column (a)) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders |
|
|
12,728,668 |
(1) |
|
$ |
14.06 |
|
|
|
7,787,895 |
(2) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
|
12,728,668 |
|
|
$ |
14.06 |
|
|
|
7,787,895 |
|
____________________
|
(1) |
Includes 12,260,187 outstanding stock options and 468,481 outstanding RSUs. |
|
(2) |
Our 2013 Plan, in addition to being available for future issuance upon exercise of stock options and vesting of RSUs that have been or may be granted after December 31, 2021, and our 2019 Plan, each provide for the issuance of SARS, restricted stock awards, other stock-based awards, incentive awards, and dividend equivalents. |
CEO
Pay Ratio
As required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K (“Item 402(u)”), we are providing the following information
about the relationship between the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Helen Sabzevari, Ph.D.,
our CEO during 2021. The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u).
Because Item 402(u) affords a large degree of flexibility in calculating the CEO pay ratio by allowing the use of reasonable estimates,
assumptions and methodologies, the pay ratio disclosed by us below may not be comparable to pay ratio disclosures presented by other companies.
For 2021, our last completed fiscal year:
|
· |
as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, the annual total compensation of our CEO was $2,516,168 (see above for details on this calculation); and |
|
· |
the annual total compensation of our median employee (other than our CEO) was $80,070. |
Based on this information,
for 2021, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 31
to 1.
In accordance with Item 402(u), we elected to
use the same median employee identified in 2020 in our 2021 pay ratio calculations, as we believe that there was no change in our employee
population or employee compensation arrangements that we believe would result in a significant change to our pay ratio disclosure for
2021. However, our pay ratio may fluctuate from year-to-year due to changes in the median employee’s or our CEO’s compensation.
We believe putting into context how our median employee was identified highlights why that employee’s compensation and the resulting
pay ratio, and year-over-year changes thereto, should not be compared on an “apples-to-apples” basis.
Consistent with our methodology disclosed in our
2020 proxy statement, to identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual
total compensation of the median employee, the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates used were as follows:
Determination Date
We selected December 31, 2020 as the date from
which to determine our total employee population and gather pay data.
Employee Population
As of December 31, 2020, according to internal
payroll records, our total employee population, excluding our CEO, consisted of approximately 476 individuals working at our Company or
within our consolidated subsidiaries on either a full-time or part-time basis. Out of these approximate 476 individuals, 94% are located
in North America and 6% are located in Europe.
Methodology
To identify the median employee, a listing was
prepared of our employee population as of December 31, 2020. We annualized the compensation of any permanent employees, employed either
part-time or full-time, who were employed by us for less than the full fiscal year. Additionally, we converted non-USD currency to USD
using the Oanda conversion rate as of December 16, 2020. We then compared the actual cash compensation received during 2020 for those
employees, consisting of base salary amounts and annual incentive awards as reflected by internal payroll records. We identified our median
employee using this compensation measure, which was consistently applied to all of our employees across the employee population. Using
this methodology, we determined that the median employee was a full-time, salaried employee located in the United States.
Annual Total Compensation
With respect to the annual total compensation
of the median employee, we identified and calculated the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2021 in accordance with the
requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K. This calculation is the same calculation used for our named executive officers as
set forth in the Summary Compensation Table earlier in this Proxy Statement. With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO,
we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table herein.
Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
The following is a description of transactions
since January 1, 2021 to which we have been a party, in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000, and in which any
of our directors, executive officers or beneficial owners of more than 5% of our voting securities, or affiliates or immediate family
members of any of our directors, executive officers or beneficial owners of more than 5% of our voting securities, had or will have a
direct or indirect material interest.
We believe that each of these transactions was
on terms no less favorable to us than terms we could have obtained from unaffiliated third parties. Moreover, all of these transactions
have been approved by a majority of the independent and disinterested members of the Board. It is our intention to ensure that all future
transactions, if any, between us and our officers, directors, principal shareholders and their affiliates or family members, are approved
by the Audit Committee or a majority of the independent and disinterested members of the Board, and are on terms no less favorable to
us than those that we could obtain from unaffiliated third parties.
Greenberg Traurig LLP
Mr. Alvarez, a member of the Board, is the Senior
Chairman of the international law firm Greenberg Traurig. Greenberg Traurig provides legal services to us from time to time, for which
it has received and may continue to receive customary fees. Greenberg Traurig received an aggregate of $9,767 in fees in connection with
2021 legal services. As the Senior Chairman, Mr. Alvarez does not participate in such services and does not materially benefit from the
engagement. As such, and in consideration of the fact that the amount received by Greenberg Traurig does not exceed 5% of Greenberg’s
Traurig’s consolidated gross revenues for 2021, the Board has determined that this relationship is not material and that it does
not impair Mr. Alvarez’s independence.
Transactions with Third Security, LLC and Affiliates
Through December 2019, the Company was party to
a Services Agreement (“Services Agreement”) with Third Security pursuant to which Third Security provided the Company with
certain professional, legal, financial, administrative, and other support services necessary to support the Company and its Chairman.
Following the expiration of the Services Agreement in 2020, the Company entered into a new agreement with Third Security under which the
Company reimburses Third Security for certain tax-related services performed by Third Security as requested by the Company. The Company
also reimburses Third Security for certain out-of-pocket expenses incurred on the Company’s behalf prior to and after the expiration
of the Services Agreement under a separate agreement. The total amount of expenses reimbursed by the Company for the year ended December
31, 2021, was approximately $99,000.
The Company also, until November 2021, subleased
certain administrative offices to Third Security. The significant terms of the lease mirrored the terms of the Company's lease with the
landlord, and the Company recorded sublease income of approximately $75,000, $83,000, and $89,000 for the years ended December 31,
2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Transactions with ECC Parties, Joint Ventures and Majority-Owned
Subsidiaries
Intrexon Energy Partners
In March 2014, we and certain investors (the “IEP
Investors”), including an affiliate of Mr. Kirk, NRM VII Holdings I, LLC, entered into a Limited Liability Company Agreement which
governs the affairs and conduct of business of Intrexon Energy Partners, LLC (“Intrexon Energy Partners”), a joint venture
formed to optimize and scale-up our methane bioconversion platform technology for the production of certain fuels and lubricants. We also
entered into an ECC with Intrexon Energy Partners providing exclusive rights to our technology for the use in bioconversion, as a result
of which we received a technology access fee of $25 million while retaining a 50% membership interest in Intrexon Energy Partners. The
IEP Investors
made initial
capital contributions, totaling $25 million in the aggregate, in exchange for pro rata membership interests in Intrexon Energy Partners
totaling 50%.
We committed to make capital contributions of
up to $25 million, and the IEP Investors, as a group and pro rata in accordance with their respective membership interests in Intrexon
Energy Partners, have committed to make additional capital contributions of up to $25 million, at the request of the Intrexon Energy Partners
Board, and subject to certain limitations. Intrexon Energy Partners is governed by the Intrexon Energy Partners Board, which has five
members. Two members of the Intrexon Energy Partners Board are designated by us and three members are designated by a majority of the
IEP Investors. We and the IEP Investors have the right, but not the obligation, to make additional capital contributions above these limits
when and if solicited by the Intrexon Energy Partners Board.
Any investor who purchased at least $10.0 million
of our common stock in the private placement related to Intrexon Energy Partners will have the right to require us to register such shares
of our common stock on a registration statement on Form S-3, if available for use.
Intrexon Energy Partners II
In December 2015, we and certain investors (the
“IEP II Investors”), including Harvest, entered into a Limited Liability Company Agreement which governs the affairs and conduct
of business of Intrexon Energy Partners II, LLC (“Intrexon Energy Partners II”), a joint venture formed to utilize our natural
gas bioconversion platform for the production of 1,4-butanediol, an industrial chemical intermediate used to manufacture spandex, polyurethane,
plastics, and polyester. We also entered into an ECC with Intrexon Energy Partners II providing exclusive rights to our technology for
the use in the field, as a result of which we received a technology access fee of $18 million while retaining a 50% membership interest
in Intrexon Energy Partners II. The IEP II Investors made initial capital contributions, totaling $18 million in the aggregate, in exchange
for pro rata membership interests in Intrexon Energy Partners II totaling 50%. In December 2015, the owners of Intrexon Energy Partners
II made a capital contribution of $4 million, half of which was paid by us. We committed to make capital contributions of up to $10 million,
and the IEP II Investors, as a group and pro rata in accordance with their respective membership interests in Intrexon Energy Partners,
have committed to make additional capital contributions of up to $10 million, at the request of the Intrexon Energy Partners II board
of managers, or the Intrexon Energy Partners II Board, and subject to certain limitations. Intrexon Energy Partners II is governed by
the Intrexon Energy Partners II Board, which has five members. One member of the Intrexon Energy Partners II Board is designated by us
and four members of the Intrexon Energy Partners II Board are designated by a majority of the IEP II Investors. We and the IEP Investors
II have the right, but not the obligation, to make additional capital contributions above these limits when and if solicited by the Intrexon
Energy Partners II Board.
Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions
The Board has adopted a written related policy
with respect to related person transactions. This policy governs the review, approval or ratification of covered related person transactions.
The Audit Committee of the Board oversees and manages this policy.
For purposes of this policy, a “related
person transaction” is a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships)
in which we (or any of our subsidiaries) were, are or will be a participant, and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any
related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect interest. For purposes of determining whether a transaction is a related person
transaction, the Audit Committee relies upon Item 404 of Regulation S-K, promulgated under the Exchange Act.
The policy generally provides that we may enter
into a related person transaction only if:
|
· |
the Audit Committee pre-approves such transaction in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the policy; |
|
· |
the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party and the Audit Committee (or the chairperson of the Audit Committee) approves or ratifies such transaction in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the policy; |
|
· |
the transaction is approved by the disinterested members of the Board; or |
|
· |
the transaction involves compensation approved by the Compensation Committee. |
In the event a related person transaction is not
pre-approved by the Audit Committee and our management determines to recommend such related person transaction to the Audit Committee,
such transaction must be reviewed by the Audit Committee. After review, the Audit Committee will approve or disapprove such transaction.
When our Chief Legal Officer, in consultation with our CEO or our Chief Financial Officer, determines that it is not practicable or desirable
for us to wait until the next Audit Committee meeting, the chairperson of the Audit Committee possesses delegated authority to act on
behalf of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee (or the chairperson of the Audit Committee) may approve only those related person transactions
that are in, or not inconsistent with, our best interests and the best interests of our shareholders, as the Audit Committee (or the chairperson
of the Audit Committee) determines in good faith.
The Audit Committee has determined that certain
types of related person transactions are deemed to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Our related person transaction policy provides
that the following transactions, even if the amount exceeds $120,000 in the aggregate, are considered to be pre-approved by the Audit
Committee:
|
· |
any employment of certain named executive officers that would be publicly disclosed; |
|
· |
director compensation that would be publicly disclosed; |
|
· |
transactions with other companies where the related person’s only relationship is as a director or owner of less than 10% of said company (other than a general partnership), if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $200,000 or 5% of that company’s consolidated gross revenues; |
|
· |
transactions where all shareholders receive proportional benefits; |
|
· |
transactions involving competitive bids; |
|
· |
transactions with a related person involving the rendering of services at rates or charges fixed in conformity with law or governmental authority; and |
|
· |
transactions with a related person involving services as a bank depositary of funds, transfer agent, registrar, trustee under a trust indenture or similar services. |
In addition, the Audit Committee will review the
policy at least annually and recommend amendments to the policy to the Board from time to time.
The policy provides that all related person transactions
will be disclosed to the Audit Committee, and all material related person transactions will be disclosed to the Board. Additionally, all
related person transactions requiring public disclosure will be properly disclosed, as applicable, on our various public filings.
The Audit Committee will review all relevant
information available to it about the related person transaction. The policy provides that the Audit Committee may approve or ratify
the related person transaction only if the Audit Committee determines that, under all of the circumstances, the transaction is in,
or is not inconsistent with, our best interests. The policy provides that the Audit Committee may, in its sole discretion, impose
such conditions as it deems appropriate on us or the related person in connection with approval of the related person
transaction.
PROPOSAL 4
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE
PRECIGEN, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED 2013 OMNIBUS
INCENTIVE PLAN
(THE “2013 PLAN”)
Overview
The Board requests that shareholders approve the
proposed amendment (the “2013 Plan Amendment”) to the 2013 Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock which may
be subject to awards under the 2013 Plan by 10,000,000 shares. Other than the increase in the number of shares which may be subject to
awards under the 2013 Plan that is reflected in the proposed 2013 Plan Amendment, there are no other changes proposed to the 2013 Plan.
The 2013 Plan became effective upon the closing
of our initial public offering in August 2013 and was approved by our shareholders at our 2014 Annual Meeting. Our shareholders have authorized
additional shares for issuance pursuant to the 2013 Plan at each of our Annual Meetings since 2015, except for the Annual Meeting that
was held in 2021.
Share Increase
The 2013 Plan has served as an important part
of our overall compensation program since it became effective. The 2013 Plan enables us to grant equity-based compensation awards designed
to provide an additional incentive for our officers, employees, and non-employee directors and other service providers who are critical
to the achievement of our long-term financial and strategic goals. We believe that the 2013 Plan Amendment, which amends the 2013 Plan
to increase by 10,000,000 the number of shares of common stock which may be subject to awards thereunder, supports our ability to attract,
motivate, and retain the most competent and skilled officers, employees, non-employee directors, and other service providers, which is
a significant factor for our long-term success. Awards made under the 2013 Plan, including annual cash incentive awards and long-term
incentive equity grants, are designed to align the individual interests of our officers, employees, non-employee directors, and other
service providers with the interests of our shareholders and reward them for the creation of long-term shareholder value.
In 2021, we determined that it was not necessary
to ask shareholders to authorize additional shares for issuance under the 2013 Plan at our Annual Meeting held in 2021, which was a break
from our prior practice of requesting that shareholders authorize additional shares for issuance on an annual basis. As we look toward
our future equity incentive needs, we believe that the number of shares currently available for issuance under the 2013 Plan may not be
sufficient in view of our compensation structure and strategy and that the availability of the additional shares sought in this proposal
will help us to continue to have a sufficient number of shares of common stock available for awards under the 2013 Plan. As a result,
the Compensation Committee and the Board have approved the 2013 Plan Amendment, subject to the approval of our shareholders at the Annual
Meeting.
As of March 31, 2022, there were options to purchase
an aggregate of 14,121,502 shares of common stock outstanding under the 2013 Plan at a weighted-average exercise price of $12.37 per share
and a weighted-average remaining term of 7.1 years, 569,445 RSUs outstanding under the 2013 Plan, and 2,085,537 shares of common stock
reserved for future issuance under the 2013 Plan, which is our only plan under which equity awards can currently be made to officers and
employees. As of March 31, 2022, the fair market value of our common stock was $2.11, which was the closing price of our common stock
on that date on the Nasdaq Global Select Market.
As of March 31, 2022, all of our
approximately 500 employees were eligible to receive awards under the 2013 Plan, including 4 executive officers. As of March 31,
2022, 9 non-employee directors and all of our consultants and advisors were also eligible to receive awards under the 2013 Plan,
although we currently only make awards to non-employee directors, consultants and advisors under the 2019 Plan and not the 2013
Plan. The basis for participation in the 2013 Plan is the Compensation Committee’s decision, in its sole discretion, that an
award to an eligible participant will further the 2013 Plan’s purposes of attracting, retaining, and motivating such
participants to promote the success of our business by linking their personal interests to those of our
shareholders
and to encourage stock ownership on the part of management. In exercising its discretion, the Compensation Committee will consider the
recommendations of management and the purposes of the 2013 Plan.
In making the recommendation to increase the 2013
Plan’s share reserve by an additional 10,000,000 shares, we considered a number of factors, including:
Importance of Long-Term Equity Incentives.
Long-term equity incentives are an important component of our executive compensation program, motivating officers and employees, non-employee
directors, and other service providers to make decisions that focus on creating long-term value for shareholders, aligning their interests
with the interests of shareholders, and serving as an effective recruitment and retention tool.
Historical Burn Rate. We are committed
to managing the use of our equity incentives prudently to balance the benefits equity compensation brings to our compensation program
with the dilution it causes our shareholders. As part of our analysis when considering the proposed share increase, we considered the
2013 Plan’s three-year average “burn rate,” or the number of shares subject to equity awards granted from the beginning
of 2019 through the first quarter of 2022, divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for that period. We also considered
that during the period from the beginning of 2019 through first quarter of 2022, we made equity grants from the 2013 Plan in connection
with the following: leadership appointments to advance our efforts, including the appointments of our CEO and CFO; the compensation of
employees who we believe are critical to furthering our business strategy; equity grants in lieu of cash compensation; incentivizing our
key officers and employees; and our former Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with Mr. Kirk that expired on March 31, 2020 (the “RSU
Agreement”). We believe these new hires and compensation decisions are critical to the development and strength of our senior management
team to attract the experience and talent necessary to further implement our strategy.
Overhang Percentage. Over the period from
January 1, 2019 through March 31, 2022 , our overhang percentage has averaged 11.8%, which is based on (i) approximately 13,282,000 shares
subject to outstanding equity awards under the 2013 Plan and 2019 Plan, (ii) 8,171,000 shares available for future equity awards under
the 2013 Plan and 2019 Plan, and (iii) 181,651,000 shares of the Company outstanding on a fully-diluted basis. The following table sets
forth the total equity dilution as of the date of this proxy statement:
Number of Stock Options Outstanding | |
| 16,019,710 | |
Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
$ | 11.23 | |
Weighted Average Term (in years) | |
| 7.32 | |
Number of Full-Value Stock Awards Outstanding | |
| 1,185,205 | |
Number of Shares Remaining for Future Grant | |
| 2,328,562 | |
2013 Plan | |
| 2,085,537 | |
2019 Plan | |
| 243,025 | |
Common Shares Outstanding as of April 12, 2022 | |
| 207,639,277 | |
Overhang Percentage | |
| 9.4% | |
If approved, the 10,000,000 shares reserved for
issuance under the 2013 Plan would, when combined with shares subject to outstanding equity awards under the 2013 Plan and 2019 Plan as
reflected in the table above, increase the overhang percentage to approximately 14.2%.
Shareholder Value Transfer Test. When evaluating
the appropriate number of shares to increase the share reserve under the 2013 Plan, we reviewed the shareholder value transfer of the
proposed increase, calculated as the value of available shares and plan awards as a percentage of our market capitalization, and determined
that the addition of 10,000,000 shares to the 2013 Plan share reserve was reasonable and consistent with industry guidelines.
Expected Duration. We expect that the shares
available for issuance pursuant to future awards, including the additional shares if this proposal is approved by our shareholders, will
be sufficient for currently anticipated awards under the 2013 Plan through the remainder of the term of the 2013 Plan currently scheduled
to expire in August 2023. Expectations regarding future share usage could be impacted
by a number
of factors such as hiring and promotion activity at the executive level; the rate at which shares are returned to the 2013 Plan reserve
upon awards’ expiration, forfeiture, or cash settlement; the future performance of our stock price; consequences of acquisitions
or dispositions; and other factors. While we believe that the assumptions we used are reasonable, future share usage may differ from
current expectations. If, however, the shareholders do not approve the 2013 Plan Amendment to increase the number of shares reserved
for issuance under the 2013 Plan, there may not be a sufficient number of shares of our common stock available to achieve our recruiting
and retention objectives.
Text of the 2013 Plan Amendment
The first paragraph of Section 6.02 of the 2013
Plan would be revised as follows:
“6.02 Aggregate Limit
The maximum aggregate number (the “Maximum
Aggregate Number”) of shares of Common Stock which may be subject to Awards under this Plan is 37,000,000 shares of Common Stock.”
Summary of the Material Terms of the 2013 Plan
A summary of the material terms of the 2013 Plan
is set forth below. This summary does not purport to be a complete description of all provisions of the 2013 Plan and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the 2013 Plan, a copy of which is attached as an appendix to this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference
into this proposal.
Purpose. We established the 2013 Plan to
attract, retain, and motivate our employees, officers, and non-employee directors, to promote the success of our business by linking the
personal interests of our employees, officers, consultants, advisors, and non-employee directors to those of our shareholders and to encourage
stock ownership on the part of management. The 2013 Plan is intended to permit the grant of stock options (both incentive stock options,
or “ISOs”, and non-qualified stock options, or “NQSOs,” and, collectively, “Options”), stock appreciation
rights, or “SARs,” restricted stock awards, or Restricted Stock Awards, RSUs, incentive awards, or Incentive Awards, other
stock-based awards, or Stock Based Awards, and dividend equivalents, or Dividend Equivalents.
Administration. The 2013 Plan is administered
by the Compensation Committee, which has the authority to grant awards to such persons and upon such terms and conditions (not inconsistent
with the provisions of the 2013 Plan) as it may consider appropriate. The Committee may act through subcommittees or, with respect to
awards granted to individuals who are not subject to the reporting and other provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and who are
not members of the Board or the board of directors of our Affiliates (as defined by the 2013 Plan), delegate to one or more officers all
or part of its duties with respect to such awards. The Committee may, at its discretion, accelerate the time at which any award may be
exercised, become transferable or nonforfeitable, or become earned and settled including without limitation (i) in the event of the participant’s
death, disability, retirement, or involuntary termination of employment or service (including a voluntary termination of employment or
service for good reason) or (ii) in connection with a Change in Control (as defined in the 2013 Plan).
Authorized Shares. Under the 2013 Plan,
we may issue a maximum aggregate of 27,000,000 shares of common stock (37,000,000 shares of common stock if the shareholders approve the
2013 Plan Amendment to the 2013 Plan), all of which may be issued pursuant to Options, SARs, Restricted Stock Awards, RSUs, Incentive
Awards, Stock-Based Awards, or Dividend Equivalents. Each share issued in connection with an award will reduce the number of shares available
for awards under the 2013 Plan by one, and each share covered under the exercised portion of a SAR will reduce the number of shares available
for awards under the 2013 Plan by one, even though the share is not actually issued upon settlement of the SAR. Shares relating to awards
that are terminated by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation or otherwise without issuance of shares of common stock, settled in cash in
lieu of shares, or exchanged prior to the issuance of shares for awards not involving shares, will again be available for issuance under
the 2013 Plan. Shares not issued as a result of net settlement of an award, tendered or withheld to pay the exercise price, purchase price
or withholding taxes of an award or shares purchased on the open market with the proceeds of the exercise price of an award will be deemed
delivered under the 2013 Plan and will not again be available for issuance under the 2013 Plan.
Written Agreements. All awards granted
under the 2013 Plan will be governed by separate written agreements between the participants and us. The written agreements will specify
the terms of the particular awards.
Transferability. Generally, an award is
non-transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and during the lifetime of the participant to whom the award
is granted, the award may only be exercised by, or payable to, the participant. However, the Compensation Committee may provide that awards,
other than ISOs or a Corresponding SAR (as defined below) that is related to an ISO, may be gifted by a participant to immediate family
members or trust or other entities on behalf of the participant and/or family members. Any such transfer will be permitted only if (i)
the participant does not receive any consideration for the transfer and (ii) the Committee expressly approves the transfer. The holder
of the transferred award will be bound by the same terms and conditions that governed the award during the period that it was held by
the participant, except that such transferee may only transfer the award by will or the laws of descent and distribution.
Maximum Award Period. No award will be
exercisable or become vested or payable more than ten years after the date of grant. An ISO granted to a Ten Percent Shareholder (as defined
in the 2013 Plan) or a Corresponding SAR that relates to such an ISO may not be exercisable more than five years after the date of grant.
Compliance with Applicable Law. No award
will be exercisable, vested, or payable except in compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations (including, without
limitation, tax and securities laws), any listing agreement with any stock exchange to which we are a party, and the rules of all domestic
stock exchanges on which our shares may be listed.
Payment. The exercise or purchase price
of an award, and any taxes required to be withheld with respect to an award, may be paid in cash or, if the written agreement so provides,
the Compensation Committee may allow a participant to pay all or part of the exercise or purchase price, and any required withholding
taxes, by tendering shares of common stock the participant already owns, through a broker-assisted cashless exercise, by means of “net
exercise” procedure whereby shares of common stock shall be withheld from delivery, or any other specified medium of payment or
combination thereof.
Shareholder Rights. No participant will
have any rights as our shareholder as a result of issuance of an award until the award is settled by the issuance of common stock (other
than a Restricted Stock Award or RSUs for which certain shareholder rights may be granted).
Forfeiture Provisions. Awards do not confer
upon any individual any right to continue in our employ or service or in the employ or service of our affiliated entities. All rights
to any award that a participant has will be immediately forfeited if the participant is discharged from employment or service.
Types of Awards
Options. Both ISOs and NQSOs may be granted
under the 2013 Plan. The Compensation Committee determines the eligible individuals to whom grants of Options will be made, the number
of shares subject to each option, the exercise price per share, the time or times at which the option may be exercised, whether any performance
or other conditions must be satisfied before a participant may exercise an Option, the method of payment by the participant, the method
of delivery of shares to a participant, whether the Option is an ISO or a NQSO, and all other terms and conditions of the award. However,
the exercise price of an Option may not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date the Option is granted.
No participant may be granted ISOs that are first exercisable in any calendar year for shares of common stock having an aggregate fair
value (determined on the date of grant) that exceeds $100,000. With respect to an ISO granted to a participant who is a Ten Percent Shareholder
(as defined in the 2013 Plan), the exercise price per share may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on
the date the Option is granted. At the Committee’s discretion, an Option may be granted with or without a Corresponding SAR.
SARs. A SAR entitles the participant to
receive, upon exercise, the excess of the fair market value on that date of each share of common stock subject to the exercised portion
of the SAR over the fair market value of each such share on the date of the grant of the SAR. A SAR can be granted alone or in tandem
with an Option. A SAR granted in tandem with an Option is called a Corresponding SAR and entitles the
participant
to exercise the Option or the SAR, at which time the other tandem award expires with respect to the number of shares being exercised.
The Compensation Committee is authorized to determine the eligible individuals to whom grants of SARs will be made, the number of shares
of common stock covered by the grant, the time or times at which a SAR may be exercised, and all other terms and conditions of the SAR.
However, no participant may be granted Corresponding SARs that are related to ISOs which are first exercisable in any calendar year for
shares of common stock having an aggregate fair market value (determined on the date of grant) that exceeds $100,000.
Restricted Stock Awards and RSUs. A Restricted
Stock Award is the grant or sale of shares of common stock, which may be subject to forfeiture for a period of time or subject to certain
conditions. An RSU entitles the participant to receive, upon vesting, shares of our common stock. We will deliver to the participant one
share of common stock for each RSU that becomes earned and payable. With regard to Restricted Stock Awards, the Compensation Committee
is authorized to determine the eligible individuals to whom grants will be made, the number of shares subject to such grants, the purchase
price, if any, to be paid for each share subject to the award of restricted stock, the time or times at which the restrictions will terminate,
and all other terms and conditions of the restricted stock. With regards to RSUs, the Committee is authorized to determine the eligible
individuals to whom grants will be made, the number of shares subject to such grants and the vesting conditions entitling a participant
to settlement of the RSUs.
Incentive Awards. An Incentive Award entitles
the participant to receive cash or common stock when certain conditions are met. The Compensation Committee has the authority to determine
the eligible individuals to whom grants will be made and all other terms and conditions of the Incentive Award.
Stock-Based Awards. Stock-Based Awards
may be denominated or payable in, valued by reference to or otherwise based on shares of common stock, including awards convertible or
exchangeable into shares of common stock (or the cash value thereof) and common stock purchase rights and awards valued by reference to
the fair market value of the common stock. The Compensation Committee has the authority to determine the eligible individuals to whom
grants will be made and all other terms and conditions of Stock-Based Awards. However, the purchase price for the common stock under any
Stock-Based Award in the nature of a purchase right may not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock as of the date
the award is granted. Cash awards, as an element of or supplement to any other award under the 2013 Plan, may also be granted.
The Compensation Committee is also authorized
under the 2013 Plan to grant shares of common stock as a bonus, or to grant shares of common stock or other awards in lieu of any of our
obligations or of our affiliates to pay cash or to deliver other property under the 2013 Plan or under any other of our plans or compensatory
arrangements or any of our affiliates.
Dividend Equivalents. The Compensation
Committee may also grant Dividend Equivalents under the 2013 Plan. A Dividend Equivalent is an award that entitles the participant to
receive cash, shares of common stock, other awards, or other property equal in value to all or a specified portion of dividends paid with
respect to shares of our common stock. The Committee is authorized to determine the eligible individuals to whom grants will be made and
all other terms and conditions of the Dividend Equivalents. However, no Dividend Equivalents may be awarded in connection with an Option,
SAR, or Stock-Based Award in the nature of purchase rights.
Eligibility. Any of our employees or service
providers, employees or service providers of our Affiliates (as defined in the 2013 Plan), and nonemployee members of the Board or of
any board of directors of our Affiliates is eligible to receive an award under the 2013 Plan.
Award Limits. In any calendar year, no
participant may be granted Options, SARs or other stock-based awards in the nature of purchase rights that relate to more than 5,000,000
shares of common stock. For these purposes, an Option and its corresponding SAR will be counted as a single award. For any award stated
with reference to a specific dollar limit, the maximum amount payable with respect to any 12-month performance period to any one participant
is $5,000,000 (pro-rated up or down for performance periods greater or less than 12 months). Award limits that are expressed as a number
of shares are subject to the adjustment provisions of the 2013 Plan as described below.
Performance Criteria. The Compensation
Committee has the discretion to establish objectively determinable performance conditions for when performance-based awards will become
vested, exercisable,
and payable.
Objectively determinable performance conditions generally are performance conditions (a) that are established in writing (i) at the time
of the grant or (ii) no later than the earlier of (x) 90 days after the beginning of the period of service to which they relate and (y)
before the lapse of 25% of the period of service to which they relate; (b) that are uncertain of achievement at the time they are established
and (c) the achievement of which is determinable by a third party with knowledge of the relevant facts. These performance conditions
may be based on one or any combination of metrics related to our financial, market or business performance.
The Compensation Committee has the discretion
to select one or more periods of time over which the attainment of one or more of the foregoing performance conditions will be measured
for the purpose of determining when an award will become vested, exercisable, or payable. The Committee has the authority to adjust goals
and awards in the manner set forth in the 2013 Plan.
Change in Control. In the event of a “Change
in Control” (as defined in the 2013 Plan) and, with respect to awards that are subject to Section 409A of the Code, and such awards,
409A Awards, only to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the Code, the Compensation Committee in its discretion may, on a participant-by-participant
basis (a) accelerate the vesting of all unvested and unexercised Options, SARs or Stock-Based Awards in the nature of purchase rights
and/or terminate such awards, without any payment therefore, immediately prior to the date of any such transaction after giving the participant
at least seven days written notice of such actions; (b) fully vest and/or accelerate settlement of any awards; (c) terminate any outstanding
Options, SARs or Stock-Based Awards in the nature of purchase rights after giving the participant notice and a chance to exercise such
awards (to the extent then exercisable or exercisable upon the change in control); (d) cancel any portion of an outstanding award that
remains unexercised or is subject to restriction or forfeiture in exchange for a cash payment to the participant of the value of the award;
or (e) require that the award be assumed by the successor corporation or replaced with interests of an equal value in the successor corporation.
Amendment and Termination. The 2013 Plan
expires ten years after its original effective date, unless terminated earlier by the Board. Any award that is outstanding as of the date
the 2013 Plan expires will continue in force according to the terms set out in the award agreement. The Board may terminate, amend, or
modify the 2013 Plan at any time. However, shareholder approval may be required for certain types of amendments under applicable law or
regulatory authority. Except as may be provided in an award agreement or the 2013 Plan, no amendment to the 2013 Plan may adversely affect
the terms and conditions of any existing award in any material way without the participant’s consent.
An amendment will be contingent on approval of
our shareholders, to the extent required by law, by the rules of any stock exchange on which our securities are then traded or if the
amendment would (i) increase the benefits accruing to participants under the 2013 Plan, including without limitation, any amendment to
the 2013 Plan or any agreement to permit a re-pricing or decrease in the exercise price of any outstanding awards, (ii) increase the aggregate
number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2013 Plan, or (iii) modify the eligibility requirements for participation
in the 2013 Plan.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Awards under the
2013 Plan
The following discussion summarizes the principal
federal income tax consequences associated with awards under the 2013 Plan. The discussion is based on laws, regulations, rulings, and
court decisions currently in effect, all of which are subject to change.
ISOs. A participant will not recognize taxable income on the
grant or exercise of an ISO (although the excess of the fair market value of the common stock over the exercise price will be included
for alternative minimum tax purposes in the year of exercise). A participant will recognize taxable income when he or she disposes of
the shares of common stock acquired under the ISO. If the disposition occurs more than two years after the grant of the ISO and more than
one year after its exercise (the “ISO holding period”), the participant will recognize long-term capital gain (or loss) to
the extent the amount realized from the disposition exceeds (or is less than) the participant’s tax basis in the shares of common
stock. A participant’s tax basis in the shares of common stock acquired under an ISO generally will be the amount the participant
paid for the stock. If common stock acquired under an ISO is disposed of before the expiration of the ISO holding period described above,
the participant will recognize as ordinary income in the year of the disposition the excess of the fair market value of the common stock
on the date of exercise
of the ISO over the exercise price. Any additional gain will be treated
as long-term or short-term capital gain, depending on the length of time the participant held the shares. Special rules apply if a participant
pays the exercise price by delivery of common stock. We will not be entitled to a federal income tax deduction with respect to the grant
or exercise of an ISO. However, in the event a participant disposes of common stock acquired under an ISO before the expiration of the
ISO holding period described above, we generally will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income
the participant recognizes on the disqualifying disposition.
NQSOs. A participant will not recognize any taxable income on
the grant of a NQSO. On the exercise of a NQSO, the participant will recognize as ordinary income the excess of the fair market value
of the common stock acquired over the exercise price. A participant’s tax basis in the common stock then is the amount paid for
the shares of common stock plus any amounts included in income on exercise of the NQSO. Special rules apply if a participant pays the
exercise price by delivery of common stock. The exercise of a NQSO generally will entitle us to claim a federal income tax deduction equal
to the amount of ordinary income the participant recognizes on exercise of the NQSO.
SARs. A participant will not recognize any taxable income at
the time SARs are granted. The participant at the time of receipt will recognize as ordinary income the amount of cash and the fair market
value of the common stock that he or she receives on exercise of the SAR. We generally will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction
equal to the amount of ordinary income the participant recognizes on exercise of the SAR.
Restricted Stock Awards and RSUs. With regard to Restricted
Stock Awards, a participant will recognize ordinary income on account of a Restricted Stock Award on the first day that the shares are
either transferable or no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. The ordinary income recognized will equal the excess of
the fair market value of the common stock on such date over the price, if any, paid for the stock. However, even if the shares under a
Restricted Stock Award are both nontransferable and subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the participant may make a special “83(b)
election” to recognize income, and have his or her tax consequences determined, as of the date of grant of the Restricted Stock
Award. The participant’s tax basis in the shares received under the Restricted Stock Award will equal the income recognized plus
the price, if any, paid for the Restricted Stock Award. We generally will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction equal to the ordinary
income the participant recognizes with respect to the Restricted Stock Award. With regard to RSUs, a participant will not recognize any
taxable income at the time RSUs are granted. When the terms and conditions to which the RSUs are subject have been satisfied and the RSUs
are settled, the participant will recognize as ordinary income the fair market value of the common stock he or she receives on settlement
of the RSUs. We generally will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction equal to the ordinary income the participant recognizes on
settlement of the RSUs.
Incentive Awards. A participant will not recognize any taxable
income at the time an Incentive Award is granted. When the terms and conditions to which an Incentive Award is subject have been satisfied
and the award is paid, the participant will recognize as ordinary income the amount of cash and the fair market value of the common stock
he or she receives on settlement of the Incentive Award. We generally will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction equal to the
amount of ordinary income the participant recognizes on settlement of the Incentive Award.
Stock-Based Awards. A participant will recognize ordinary income
on receipt of cash or shares of common stock paid with respect to a Stock-Based Award. We generally will be entitled to a federal tax
deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income the participant recognizes.
Dividend Equivalents. A participant will recognize as ordinary
income the amount of cash and the fair market value of any common stock he or she receives on payment of the Dividend Equivalents. To
the extent the Dividend Equivalents are paid in the form of other awards, the participant will recognize income as otherwise described
herein. We generally will be entitled to a federal tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income the participant recognizes.
Limitation on Deductions. Section 162(m) of the Code denies
a federal income tax deduction for certain compensation in excess of $1.0 million per year paid by a publicly held corporation to each
of its “covered employees.” A publicly held corporation’s covered employees include its chief executive officer, its
chief financial officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers. To retain highly skilled
executives and remain competitive with other employers, the Compensation
Committee may authorize compensation that would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code or otherwise if it determines that
such compensation is in the best interests of us and our shareholders.
Registration with the SEC
If the shareholders approve this proposal, we will file with the SEC,
as soon as reasonably practicable after such approval, a registration statement on Form S-8 relating to the additional shares available
for issuance under the 2013 Plan.
New Plan Benefits
A new plan benefits table for the amended 2013 Plan and the benefits
or amounts that would have been received by or allocated to participants for the last completed fiscal year under the amended 2013 Plan
if the amended 2013 Plan was then in effect, as described in the federal proxy rules, are not provided because all awards made under the
amended 2013 Plan will be made at the Compensation Committee’s discretion, subject to the terms of the amended 2013 Plan. Therefore,
the benefits and amounts that will be received or allocated under the amended 2013 Plan are not determinable at this time. However, please
refer to the 2021 Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement which sets forth certain information regarding awards granted to
our NEOs during the last completed fiscal year.
Vote Required and Board Recommendation
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the matter
is required for the approval of this item. As this proposal is not considered a “routine item,” your bank, broker, or other
nominee cannot vote your shares without receiving your voting instructions. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the
vote.
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS
VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE 2013 PLAN.
PROPOSAL 5
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE
PRECIGEN, INC. 2019
Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Service Providers (the “2019 Plan”)
Overview
The Board requests that shareholders approve the
proposed amendment (the “2019 Plan Amendment”) to the 2019 Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock which may
be subject to awards under the 2019 Plan by 7,000,000 shares. Other than the increase in the number of shares which may be subject to
awards under the 2019 Plan that is reflected in the proposed 2019 Plan Amendment, there are no other changes proposed to the 2019 Plan.
The Board adopted the 2019 Plan in April 2019,
which became effective upon approval by our shareholders on the date of our 2019 Annual Meeting,
June 12, 2019.
Share Increase
The 2019 Plan has served as an important part
of our overall compensation program since it became effective. The 2019 Plan enables us to grant equity-based compensation awards designed
to provide an additional incentive for our non-employee directors and other service providers who are critical to the achievement of our
long-term financial and strategic goals. We believe that the 2019 Plan Amendment, which amends the 2019 Plan to increase by 7,000,000
the number of shares of common stock which may be subject to awards thereunder, supports our ability to attract,
retain and motivate our non-employee service providers and to promote the success of our business by linking the personal interests
of our consultants, advisors, non-employee directors and other non-employee service providers to those of our shareholders.
We believe that the number of shares currently
available for issuance under the 2019 Plan may not be sufficient in view of our compensation structure and strategy and that the availability
of the additional shares sought in this proposal will help us to continue to have a sufficient number of shares of common stock available
for awards under the 2019 Plan. As a result, the Compensation Committee and the Board have approved the 2019 Plan Amendment, subject to
the approval of our shareholders at the Annual Meeting.
As of March 31, 2022, there were options to purchase
an aggregate of 1,898,208 shares of common stock outstanding under the 2019 Plan at a weighted-average exercise price of $2.74 per share
and a weighted-average remaining term of 8.95 years, 615,760 RSUs outstanding under the 2019 Plan, and 243,025 shares of common stock reserved
for future issuance under the 2019 Plan. As of March 31, 2021, the fair market value of our common stock was $2.11, which was the closing
price of our common stock on that date on the Nasdaq Global Select Market.
As of March 31, 2022, we had nine non-employee
directors that would be eligible to participate in the 2019 Plan, and over 100 non-employee service providers that would be eligible to
receive awards under the 2019 Plan. The basis for participation in the 2019 Plan is the Compensation Committee’s decision, in its
sole discretion, that an award to an eligible participant will further the 2019 Plan’s purposes of attracting, retaining, and motivating
our non-employee service providers to promote the success of our business by linking the personal interests of our consultants, advisors,
non-employee directors and other non-employee service providers to those of our shareholders. In exercising its discretion, the Compensation
Committee will consider the recommendations of management and the purposes of the 2019 Plan.
In making the recommendation to increase the 2019
Plan’s share reserve by an additional 7,000,000 shares, we considered a number of factors, including:
Importance of Long-Term Equity Incentives.
Long-term equity incentives are an important component of our compensation program, motivating our non-employee service
providers to make decisions that focus on creating long-term value for shareholders, aligning their interests with the interests
of shareholders, and serving as an effective recruitment and retention tool.
Historical Burn Rate. We are committed
to managing the use of our equity incentives prudently to balance the benefits equity compensation brings to our compensation program
with the dilution it causes our shareholders. As part of our analysis when considering the proposed share increase, we considered the
2019 Plan’s “burn rate,” or the number of shares subject to equity awards granted since the plan’s adoption in
2019, divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for that period. We also considered that during the period from the
April 1, 2019 (the adoption of the 2019 Plan) through March 31, 2022 we made equity grants from the 2019 Plan to compensate our Board
of Directors, and we considered the remaining life of the 2019 Plan. We believe these compensation decisions are critical to the development
and strength of our Board.
Shareholder Value Transfer Test. When evaluating
the appropriate number of shares to increase the share reserve under the 2019 Plan, we reviewed the shareholder value transfer of the
proposed increase, calculated as the value of available shares and plan awards as a percentage of our market capitalization, and determined
that the addition of 7,000,000 shares to the 2019 Plan share reserve was reasonable and consistent with industry guidelines.
Overhang Percentage. See Proposal No. 4
above for information regarding the Company’s overhang percentage with respect to outstanding equity awards and shares available
for future equity awards under the 2019 Plan and 2013 Plan. If approved, the 7,000,000 shares reserved for issuance under the 2019 Plan
would, when combined with shares subject to outstanding equity awards under the 2019 Plan and 2013 Plan, increase the overhang percentage
to approximately 17.5%.
Expected Duration. We expect that the shares
available for issuance pursuant to future awards, including the additional shares if this proposal is approved by our shareholders, will
be sufficient for currently anticipated awards under the 2019 Plan for the foreseeable future. Expectations regarding future share usage
could be impacted by a number of factors such as future use of grants to our non-employee service providers; changes in Board compensation,
if any; the rate at which shares are returned to the 2019 Plan reserve upon awards’ expiration, forfeiture, or cash settlement;
the future performance of our stock price; consequences of acquisitions or dispositions; and other factors. While we believe that the
assumptions we used are reasonable, future share usage may differ from current expectations. If, however, the shareholders do not approve
the 2019 Plan Amendment to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2019 Plan, there may not be a sufficient number
of shares of our common stock available to achieve our Board recruiting and retention objectives.
Text of the 2019 Plan Amendment
The first paragraph of Section 6.02 of the 2019
Plan would be revised as follows:
“6.02 Aggregate Limit
The maximum aggregate number (the “Maximum
Aggregate Number”) of shares of Common Stock which may be subject to Awards under this Plan is 12,000,000 shares of Common Stock.”
Summary of Material Terms of the 2019 Plan
A summary of the material terms of the 2019 Plan
is set forth below. This summary does not purport to be a complete description of all provisions of the 2019 Plan and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the 2019 Plan, a copy of which is attached as an appendix to this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference
into this proposal.
Purpose; Eligibility. We established the
2019 Plan to attract, retain and motivate our non-employee service providers and to promote the success of our business by linking the
personal interests of our consultants, advisors, non-employee directors and other non-employee service providers to those of our shareholders.
The 2019 Plan permits the grant of stock options (“Options”), stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock
awards (“Restricted Stock Awards”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”), incentive awards (“Incentive Awards”),
other stock-based awards (“Stock Based Awards”) and dividend equivalents (“Dividend Equivalents”).
Administration. The 2019 Plan is administered
by our Compensation Committee, which has the authority to grant awards to such persons and upon such terms and conditions (not inconsistent
with the provisions of the 2019 Plan) as it may consider appropriate. Our Compensation Committee may act through
subcommittees
or, with respect to awards granted to individuals who are not subject to the reporting and other provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange
Act, who are not members of our Board or the board of directors of our Affiliates (as defined by the 2019 Plan), delegate to one or more
officers all or part of its duties with respect to such awards. Our Compensation Committee may, at its discretion, accelerate the time
at which any award may be exercised, become transferable or nonforfeitable or become earned and settled including without limitation
(i) in the event of the participant’s death, disability, retirement or involuntary termination of service (including a voluntary
termination of service for good reason) or (ii) in connection with a Change in Control (as defined in the 2019 Plan).
Authorized Shares. Under the 2019 Plan,
we may issue a maximum aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of common stock (15,000,000 shares of common stock if the shareholders approve the
2019 Plan Amendment to the 2019 Plan), all of which may be issued pursuant to Options, SARs, Restricted Stock Awards, RSUs, Incentive
Awards, Stock-Based Awards or Dividend Equivalents. Each share issued in connection with an award will reduce the number of shares available
under the 2019 Plan by one, and each share covered under the exercised portion of a SAR will reduce the number of shares available under
the 2019 Plan by one, even though the share is not actually issued upon settlement of the SAR. Shares relating to awards that are terminated
by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation or otherwise without issuance of shares of common stock, settled in cash in lieu of shares, or
exchanged prior to the issuance of shares for awards not involving shares, will again be available for issuance under the 2019 Plan. Shares
not issued as a result of net settlement of an award, tendered or withheld to pay the exercise price, purchase price or withholding taxes
of an award or shares purchased on the open market with the proceeds of the exercise price of an award will be deemed delivered under
the 2019 Plan and will not again be available for issuance under the 2019 Plan.
Written Agreements. All awards granted
under the 2019 Plan will be governed by separate written agreements between the participants and us. The written agreements will specify
the terms of the particular awards.
Transferability. Generally, an award is
non-transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and during the lifetime of the participant to whom the award
is granted, the award may only be exercised by, or payable to, the participant. However, the Compensation Committee may provide that awards
may be gifted by a participant to immediate family members or trust or other entities on behalf of the Participant and/or family members.
Any such transfer will be permitted only if (i) the participant does not receive any consideration for the transfer and (ii) the Committee
expressly approves the transfer. The holder of the transferred award will be bound by the same terms and conditions that governed the
award during the period that it was held by the participant, except that such transferee may only transfer the award by will or the laws
of descent and distribution.
Maximum Award Period. No award will be
exercisable or become vested or payable more than ten years after the date of grant.
Compliance with Applicable Law. No award
will be exercisable, vested or payable except in compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations (including, without
limitation, tax and securities laws), any listing agreement with any stock exchange to which we are a party, and the rules of all domestic
stock exchanges on which our shares may be listed.
Payment. The exercise or purchase price
of an award, and any taxes required to be withheld with respect to an award, may be paid in cash or, if the written agreement so provides,
the Compensation Committee may allow a participant to pay all or part of the exercise or purchase price, and any required withholding
taxes, by tendering shares of common stock the participant already owns, through a broker-assisted cashless exercise, by means of “net
exercise” procedure whereby shares of common stock shall be withheld from delivery, or any other specified medium of payment or
combination thereof.
Shareholder Rights. No participant shall
have any rights as our shareholder as a result of issuance of an award until the award is settled by the issuance of common stock (other
than a Restricted Stock Award or RSUs for which certain shareholder rights may be granted).
Forfeiture Provisions. Awards do not confer
upon any individual any right to continue in our service or in the service of our affiliated entities. All rights to any award that a
participant has will be immediately forfeited if the participant is discharged from service.
Types of Awards
Options. All Options granted under the
2019 Plan will be non-qualified stock options. Our Compensation Committee determines the eligible individuals to whom grants of Options
will be made, the number of shares subject to each option, the exercise price per share, the time or times at which the option may be
exercised, whether any performance or other conditions must be satisfied before a participant may exercise an option, the method of payment
by the participant, the method of delivery of shares to a participant and all other terms and conditions of the award. However, the exercise
price of an Option may not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date the Option is granted. At the Compensation
Committee’s discretion, an Option may be granted with or without a Corresponding SAR (as defined below).
SARs. A SAR entitles the participant to
receive, upon exercise, the excess of the fair market value on that date of each share of common stock subject to the exercised portion
of the SAR over the fair market value of each such share on the date of the grant of the SAR. A SAR can be granted alone or in tandem
with an Option. A SAR granted in tandem with an Option is called a Corresponding SAR and entitles the participant to exercise the Option
or the SAR, at which time the other tandem award expires with respect to the number of shares being exercised. The Compensation Committee
is authorized to determine the eligible individuals to whom grants of SARs will be made, the number of shares of common stock covered
by the grant, the time or times at which a SAR may be exercised and all other terms and conditions of the SAR.
Restricted Stock Awards and RSUs. A Restricted
Stock Award is the grant or sale of shares of common stock, which may be subject to forfeiture for a period of time or subject to certain
conditions. An RSU entitles the participant to receive, upon vesting, shares of our common stock. We will deliver to the participant one
share of common stock for each RSU that becomes earned and payable. With regard to Restricted Stock Awards, the Compensation Committee
is authorized to determine the eligible individuals to whom grants will be made, the number of shares subject to such grants, the purchase
price, if any, to be paid for each share subject to the award of restricted stock, the time or times at which the restrictions will terminate,
and all other terms and conditions of the restricted stock. With regards to RSUs, the Compensation Committee is authorized to determine
the eligible individuals to whom grants will be made, the number of shares subject to such grants and the vesting conditions entitling
a participant to settlement of the RSUs.
Incentive Awards. An Incentive Award entitles
the participant to receive cash or common stock when certain conditions are met. The Compensation Committee has the authority to determine
the eligible individuals to whom grants will be made and all other terms and conditions of the Incentive Award.
Stock-Based Awards. Stock-Based Awards
may be denominated or payable in, valued by reference to or otherwise based on shares of common stock, including awards convertible or
exchangeable into shares of common stock (or the cash value thereof) and common stock purchase rights and awards valued by reference to
the fair market value of the common stock. The Compensation Committee has the authority to determine the eligible individuals to whom
grants will be made and all other terms and conditions of Stock-Based Awards. However, the purchase price for the common stock under any
Stock-Based Award in the nature of a purchase right may not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock as of the date
the award is granted. Cash awards, as an element of or supplement to any other award under the 2019 Plan, may also be granted.
Our Compensation Committee is also authorized
under the 2019 Plan to grant shares of common stock or other awards in lieu of any of our obligations or of our affiliates to pay cash
or to deliver other property under the 2019 Plan or under any other of our plans or compensatory arrangements or any of our affiliates.
Dividend Equivalents. Our Compensation
Committee may also grant Dividend Equivalents under the 2019 Plan. A Dividend Equivalent is an award that entitles the participant to
receive cash, shares of common stock, other awards or other property equal in value to all or a specified portion of dividends paid with
respect to shares of our common stock. The Compensation Committee is authorized to determine the eligible individuals to whom grants will
be made and all other terms and conditions of the Dividend Equivalents. However, no Dividend Equivalents may be awarded in connection
with an Option, SAR or Stock-Based Award in the nature of purchase rights.
Eligibility. Any of our non-employee service
providers or service providers of our Affiliates (as defined in the 2019 Plan), non-employee members of our Board or of any board of directors
of our Affiliates and any entity that is a wholly-owned alter ego of such member of the Board or board of directors of an Affiliate or
other person or entity that provides services is eligible to receive an award under the 2019 Plan.
Performance Criteria. Our Compensation
Committee has the discretion to establish performance conditions for when performance-based awards will become vested, exercisable and
payable.
Our Compensation Committee has the discretion
to select one or more periods of time over which the attainment of one or more of the performance conditions will be measured for the
purpose of determining when an award will become vested, exercisable or payable. The Compensation Committee has the authority to adjust
goals and awards in the manner set forth in the 2019 Plan.
Change in Control. In the event of a “Change
in Control” (as defined in the 2019 Plan) and, with respect to awards that are subject to Section 409A of the Code, and such awards,
409A Awards, only to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the Code, our Compensation Committee in its discretion may, on a participant-by-participant
basis (i) accelerate the vesting of all unvested and unexercised Options, SARs or Stock-Based Awards in the nature of purchase rights
and/or terminate such awards, without any payment therefore, immediately prior to the date of any such transaction after giving the participant
at least seven days written notice of such actions; (ii) fully vest and/or accelerate settlement of any awards; (iii) terminate any outstanding
Options, SARs or Stock-Based Awards in the nature of purchase rights after giving the participant notice and a chance to exercise such
awards (to the extent then exercisable or exercisable upon the change in control); (iv) cancel any portion of an outstanding award that
remains unexercised or is subject to restriction or forfeiture in exchange for a cash payment to the participant of the value of the award;
or (v) require that the award be assumed by the successor corporation or replaced with interests of an equal value in the successor corporation.
Amendment and Termination. The 2019 Plan
expires 10 years after its original effective date, unless terminated earlier by our Board. Any award that is outstanding as of the date
the 2019 Plan expires will continue in force according to the terms set out in the award agreement. Our Board may terminate, amend or
modify the 2019 Plan at any time. However, shareholder approval may be required for certain types of amendments under applicable law or
regulatory authority. Except as may be provided in an award agreement or the 2019 Plan, no amendment to the 2019 Plan may adversely affect
the terms and conditions of any existing award in any material way without the participant’s consent.
An amendment will be contingent on approval of
our shareholders, to the extent required by law, by the rules of any stock exchange on which our securities are then traded or if the
amendment would (i) increase the benefits accruing to participants under the 2019 Plan, including without limitation, any amendment to
the 2019 Plan or any agreement to permit a re-pricing or decrease in the exercise price of any outstanding awards, (ii) increase the aggregate
number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2019 Plan, or (iii) modify the eligibility requirements for participation
in the 2019 Plan.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Awards under the
2019 Plan
The following discussion summarizes the principal
federal income tax consequences associated with awards under the 2019 Plan. The discussion is based on laws, regulations, rulings and
court decisions currently in effect, all of which are subject to change.
Options. A participant will not recognize
any taxable income on the grant of an Option. On the exercise of an Option, the participant will recognize as ordinary income the excess
of the fair market value of the common stock acquired over the exercise price. A participant’s tax basis in the common stock then
is the amount paid for the shares of common stock plus any amounts included in income on exercise of the Options. Special rules apply
if a participant pays the exercise price by delivery of common stock. The exercise of an Option generally will entitle us to claim a federal
income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income the participant recognizes on exercise of the Option.
SARs. A participant will not recognize
any taxable income at the time SARs are granted. The participant at the time of receipt will recognize as ordinary income the amount of
cash and the fair market value of the common stock that he or she receives on exercise of the SAR. We generally will be entitled to
a federal
income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income the participant recognizes on exercise of the SAR.
Restricted Stock Awards and RSUs. With
regard to Restricted Stock Awards, a participant will recognize ordinary income on account of a Restricted Stock Award on the first day
that the shares are either transferable or no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. The ordinary income recognized will
equal the excess of the fair market value of the common stock on such date over the price, if any, paid for the stock. However, even if
the shares under a Restricted Stock Award are both nontransferable and subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the participant may
make a special “83(b) election” to recognize income, and have his or her tax consequences determined, as of the date of grant
of the Restricted Stock Award. The participant’s tax basis in the shares received under the Restricted Stock Award will equal the
income recognized plus the price, if any, paid for the Restricted Stock Award. We generally will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction
equal to the ordinary income the participant recognizes with respect to the Restricted Stock Award. With regard to RSUs, a participant
will not recognize any taxable income at the time RSUs are granted. When the terms and conditions to which the RSUs are subject have been
satisfied and the RSUs are paid, the participant will recognize as ordinary income the fair market value of the common stock he or she
receives on settlement of the RSUs. We generally will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income
the participant recognizes on settlement of the RSUs.
Incentive Awards. A participant will not
recognize any taxable income at the time an Incentive Award is granted. When the terms and conditions to which an Incentive Award is subject
have been satisfied and the award is paid, the participant will recognize as ordinary income the amount of cash and the fair market value
of the common stock he or she receives on settlement of the Incentive Award. We generally will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction
equal to the amount of ordinary income the participant recognizes on settlement of the Incentive Award.
Stock-Based Awards. A participant will
recognize ordinary income on receipt of cash or shares of common stock paid with respect to a Stock-Based Award. We generally will be
entitled to a federal income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income the participant recognizes.
Dividend Equivalents. A participant will
recognize as ordinary income the amount of cash and the fair market value of any common stock he or she receives on payment of the Dividend
Equivalents. To the extent the Dividend Equivalents are paid in the form of other awards, the participant will recognize income as otherwise
described herein. We generally will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income the participant
recognizes.
Third Security
On October 30, 2015, the independent members
of the Board approved a Services Agreement (the “Services Agreement”),
effective as of November 1, 2015, between us and Third Security, LLC (“Third Security”). Pursuant to the terms of the
Services Agreement, as amended, Third Security provided us with services necessary or appropriate to support us. In exchange for the
services, we paid Third Security a fee of $800,000 per month, which payment was made in fully-vested shares of our common stock.
Following the enactment of the 2019 Plan, payments made by us under the Services Agreement were made under the 2019 Plan and were
subject to the terms of the 2019 Plan. The Services Agreement terminated in December 2019.
Mr. Randal J. Kirk, our Chairman of the Board
and former Chief Executive Officer, currently serves as the Chairman and Senior Managing Director of Third
Security and owns 100 percent of the equity interests in Third Security. Third Security is the manager to certain funds that own shares
of our common stock, and, therefore may be deemed to have beneficial ownership in us of approximately 9.3%.
Registration with the SEC
If the shareholders approve this proposal, we will file with the SEC,
as soon as reasonably practicable after such approval, a registration statement on Form S-8 relating to the additional shares available
for issuance under the 2019 Plan.
New Plan Benefits
A new plan benefits table for the amended 2019 Plan and the benefits
or amounts that would have been received by or allocated to participants for the last completed fiscal year under the amended 2019 Plan
if the amended 2019 Plan was then in effect, as described in the federal proxy rules, are not provided because all awards made under the
amended 2019 Plan will be made at the Compensation Committee’s discretion, subject to the terms of the amended 2019 Plan. Therefore,
the benefits and amounts that will be received or allocated under the amended 2019 Plan are not determinable at this time. However, please
refer to the 2021 Director Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement which sets forth certain information regarding awards granted to
our non-employee directors during the last completed fiscal year.
Vote Required and Board Recommendation
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the matter
is required for the approval of this item. As this proposal is not considered a “routine item,” your bank, broker, or other
nominee cannot vote your shares without receiving your voting instructions. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the
vote.
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS
VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE 2019 PLAN.
CERTAIN MATTERS RELATING TO PROXY MATERIALS
AND ANNUAL REPORTS
Electronic Access of Proxy Materials and Annual Reports
Our Proxy Statement, including the accompanying
notice and form of proxy, and 2021 Annual Report are available at https://materials.proxyvote.com. A free paper copy of any of these
documents may be requested by contacting the Corporate Secretary in writing at Precigen, Inc., 20374 Seneca Meadows Parkway, Germantown,
Maryland 20876.
“Householding” of Proxy Materials and Annual Reports
for Record Owners
The SEC rules permit us, with your permission,
to deliver a single proxy statement and annual report to any household at which two or more shareholders of record reside at the same
address. Each shareholder will continue to receive a separate proxy card. This procedure, known as “householding,” reduces
the volume of duplicate information you receive and reduces our expenses. Shareholders of record voting by mail can choose this option
by marking the appropriate box on the proxy card included with this Proxy Statement. Shareholders of record voting via telephone or over
the internet can choose this option by following the instructions provided by telephone or over the internet, as applicable. Once given,
a shareholder’s consent will remain in effect until he or she revokes it by notifying our Corporate Secretary as described above.
If you revoke your consent, we will begin sending you individual copies of future mailings of these documents within 30 days after we
receive your revocation notice. Shareholders of record who elect to participate in householding may also request a separate copy of future
proxy statements and annual reports by writing to the Corporate Secretary at Precigen, Inc., 20374 Seneca Meadows Parkway, Germantown,
Maryland 20876 or by phone on (301) 556-9900.
Separate Copies for Beneficial Owners
Institutions that hold shares in street name for
two or more beneficial owners with the same address are permitted to deliver a single proxy statement and annual report to that address.
Any such beneficial owner can request a separate copy of this Proxy Statement or the 2021 Annual Report by contacting our Corporate Secretary
as described below. Beneficial owners with the same address who receive more than one Proxy Statement and 2021 Annual Report may request
delivery of a single Proxy Statement and 2021 Annual Report by contacting the Corporate Secretary in writing at Precigen, Inc., 20374
Seneca Meadows Parkway, Germantown, Maryland 20876.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board is not aware of any other matters to
be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than as set forth in this Proxy Statement. However, if other matters properly come
before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, the person or persons voting the proxies will vote them in accordance
with their best judgment.
By Order of the Board of Directors
DONALD P. LEHR
Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary
Germantown, Maryland
April 29, 2022
Precigen (NASDAQ:PGEN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Precigen (NASDAQ:PGEN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024