By Sarah E. Needleman
The second week of the trial between Epic Games Inc. and Apple
Inc. has centered on expert-witness testimony debating whether
smartphones are interchangeable with other videogame platforms and
the definition of a market in the digital age.
Epic sued Apple in August and accused the tech giant of
violating antitrust laws after it yanked the developer's hit
videogame "Fortnite" from the App Store. Apple has defended itself
by arguing that its app-marketplace policies are fair and that Epic
breached a contract applicable to all developers distributing apps
on its mobile devices.
The trial, in which U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
will decide the outcome, is slated to run at least three weeks in
Oakland, Calif., and could help reshape the multibillion-dollar
market for distributing apps on mobile devices.
Ms. Gonzalez Rogers is used to handling tech-industry cases, and
neither Apple nor Epic are newcomers to her courtroom. She says she
helped her son find success as an aeronautical engineer by denying
him videogames but also noted that her daughter has Nintendo Co.'s
Switch.
Here is an overview of what has happened so far and what is
next:
Who were Epic's key witnesses and what did they say?
David Evans, a University of Chicago economist, argued on Epic's
behalf that game consoles aren't good substitutes for smartphones
because they can't be used to access the internet by consumers on
the go. If that were the case, "people wouldn't use smartphones,"
he said, adding that while Nintendo's Switch is portable, it
doesn't have a cellular connection.
Dr. Evans further stated that Apple's rules unfairly prevent
developers from letting consumers know if their prices for in-app
purchases take into account the iPhone maker's 30% commission or
that consumers may be able to get better deals elsewhere.
Also speaking for Epic was Susan Athey, economics of technology
professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Business. She said
Apple locks consumers into its mobile operating system, known as
iOS, because to switch devices they would in many cases have to
repurchase the apps they already bought and deal with other
hurdles.
Epic attorney Yonatan Even referenced a 2013 email from Apple
executive Eddy Cue to current Apple Fellow Phil Schiller and Chief
Executive Tim Cook: "Who is going to buy a Samsung phone if they
have apps, movies, etc., already purchased? They now need to spend
hundreds more to get where they are today."
Who were Apple's key witnesses and what did they say?
Lorin Hitt, a professor at University of Pennsylvania's Wharton
School, discussed in-app purchase pricing, noting that developers
can charge various prices on iOS devices to demonstrate the
flexibility of the App Store. He also said Apple lowered its
developer fees on long-term subscription sales in 2016 and has said
it plans to do the same this year for companies that generate less
than $1 million in annual revenue through its marketplace.
Mr. Hitt said anticompetitive measures tend to result in reduced
quality, yet that hasn't happened with iPhone and iPad apps, as
developers have seen their revenue increase over time. "They've
been able to raise their prices because consumers perceive the
value in what they're offering," he said.
Mr. Hitt also rejected the notion that Apple locks iPhone and
iPad users into its mobile ecosystem. "For one thing, consumers
actually do switch, " he said. He added that high customer
retention rates aren't evidence of high switching costs. "I stick
with the product I have because I like the product I have."
Another witness for Apple said Epic's conclusion that the App
Store is a monopoly is incorrect. Richard Schmalensee, emeritus
professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, said Apple's behavior is similar to credit-card
companies because they offer transaction platforms and have rules
to ensure they collect commissions from sellers.
Mr. Schmalensee also argued that because Apple has the unique
ability to identify the hardware connected to its App Store, it can
benefit consumers by making purchases easy to complete, private and
secure. With multiple third-party providers, users couldn't
automatically share purchases with family members, he said.
Why did a banana in a tuxedo come up during the trial?
Testimony early in the week from Matthew Weissinger, vice
president of marketing at Epic, added some levity when referencing
a banana-like "Fortnite" character known as Peely. During Mr.
Weissinger's cross-examination, Apple's attorney showed Peely's
tuxedo-wearing alter ego "Agent Peely," saying it would have been
inappropriate to show Peely without a suit in a federal courtroom.
To set the record straight, Epic's counsel questioned whether there
is anything inappropriate about Peely without a suit. Mr.
Weissinger replied: "It's just a banana man."
Mr. Weissinger also testified that his employer has had a much
better relationship with console makers Sony Group Corp., Microsoft
Corp. and Nintendo than it did with Apple. Promotional
collaborations with Apple around "Fortnite" were less successful
and less targeted to gamers, he said.
When will we hear from Apple CEO Tim Cook?
Mr. Cook may be the final witness that Apple calls as part of
its defense.
On Tuesday Judge Gonzalez Rogers asked the parties if they are
on track with witnesses and when Mr. Cook plans to take the stand.
Epic's attorneys said they will wrap their expert testimony this
week, while Apple attorney Richard Doren said in regard to Mr.
Cook: "It'll be the last day of our case, we believe."
Mr. Cook has been Apple's chief executive since 2011 and is
expected to testify about the company's corporate values and
operations, the launch of the App Store and the competition that
Apple faces. He has defended the company's App Store practices,
saying in a congressional hearing last year that they help create a
reliable and secure user experience. Under his leadership, Apple's
market value has risen to more than $2.2 trillion from around $350
billion.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
May 14, 2021 09:10 ET (13:10 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024