UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the month of June 2020
Commission File Number: 001-13742
ICL GROUP LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
ICL Group Ltd.
Millennium Tower
23 Aranha Street
P.O. Box 20245
Tel Aviv, 61202 Israel
(972-3) 684-4400
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:
Form 20-F ☒ Form 40-F ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
Yes ☐
No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
Yes ☐
No ☒
ICL GROUP LTD.
1. S&P Reaffirms ICL's BBB- Rating with a Stable Outlook
Item 1
S&P Reaffirms ICL's BBB- Rating with a Stable Outlook
The Company hereby reports that S&P has reaffirmed the company’s Long-Term Issuer Default Rating at BBB- with a Stable Outlook. The Company hereby
reports that S&P has reaffirmed the company’s Long-Term Issuer Default Rating at BBB- with a Stable Outlook. In addition, S&P reaffirmed the Israeli local rating at ilAA with stable outlook.
The S&P report is attached.
ICL Group Ltd.
Primary Credit Analyst:
Paulina Grabowiec, London (44) 20-7176-7051; paulina.grabowiec@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:
Tom Dar, RAMAT-GAN (972) 3-753-9722; tom.dar@spglobal.com
Table Of Contents
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Credit Highlights
Outlook
Our Base-Case Scenario
Company Description
Peer Comparison
Business Risk
Financial Risk
Liquidity
Covenant Analysis
Environmental, Social, And Governance
Group Influence
Issue Ratings--Subordination Risk Analysis
Ratings Score Snapshot
|
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
|
JUNE 29, 2020 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relative resilience of the fertilizer industry to the recessionary macroeconomic environment caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
|
|
Cyclical and competitive nature of the fertilizer industry.
|
|
|
|
One of the leading global potash producers and the largest global bromine producer.
|
|
Exposure to regulatory changes and political pressure in Israel pertaining to extending the Dead Sea mining concession, which is valid until 2030.
|
|
|
|
Competitive advantage from mining in the Dead Sea, which provides access to unique high-quality raw materials, logistical advantages, proximity to ports, and a more favorable cost position for potash and
bromine than peers.
|
|
Large nondiscretionary capital expenditure (capex) requirements at the Dead Sea concession.
|
|
|
|
Synergies between the manufacturing processes for different specialty chemicals products, which provide added value.
|
|
Some exposure of the bromine segment to cyclical end-markets such as oil and gas, automotive, and construction.
|
|
|
|
Prudent financial policy and adequate liquidity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P Global Ratings forecasts that ICL Group Ltd.'s (ICL's) credit metrics will remain commensurate with the
rating in 2020, despite COVID-19-related pressures. The company's operations were minimally disrupted by the coronavirus pandemic in the first
quarter of the year. In Spain, mining operations were stopped for about three weeks as restrictions to contain the COVID-19 pandemic were implemented in the country, while in the U.K. operating rates were down about 30% to realign shifts
and maintain social-distancing measures. All operations, including those in China, are now back or close to normal levels. We anticipate that the demand for fertilizers will remain generally stable in 2020, while recognizing farmers'
tight inventory management and weaker agricultural commodity prices. That said, we also assume that the impact of the pandemic on the agriculture sector and demand for fertilizers will be much lower than for broader chemicals. This
reflects the indispensable role of the sector in security of food supply, a factor recognized by the governments by designating it as critical. In bromine, while about 25% of sales are exposed to cyclical oil and gas, automotive, and
construction end markets, we anticipate that profits should be supported by resilient demand from pharmaceutical, food, and health care industries, which account for about 8% of sales. We note ICL's proactive measures to bolster cash
balances, including drawing $300 million from its $1.1 billion revolving credit facility (RCF), and strict management of capex and working capital.
|
|
|
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
|
JUNE 29, 2020 2
|
Chart 4
ICL's operations are based primarily on natural resources--potash, bromine, magnesium, and sodium chloride from the Dead Sea; and
phosphate rock from the Negev Desert, via concessions and licenses from the Israeli government. Operations are also based on polysulphate and salt mines in Spain and England and on phosphate mines and processing plants in China. ICL is the
sixth-largest global potash producer, and the largest global producer of bromine and purified phosphoric acid among others. The company is well diversified geographically, with about 36% of its 2019 revenues generated in Europe, 27% in Asia, 17% in
North America, 13% in South America, and the remainder in the rest of the world.
Chart 5
Peer Comparison
Table 1
|
ICL Group Ltd.--Peer Comparison
|
|
Industry sector: Chemical companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICL
Group Ltd.
|
|
|
|
K+S AG
|
|
|
|
The Mosaic Co.
|
|
|
|
Uralkali OJSC
|
|
|
|
EuroChem Group AG
|
|
|
|
|
(BBB-)/(Stable)/--
|
|
|
B/Negative/B
|
|
|
|
BBB-/Negative/NR
|
|
|
|
BB-/Stable/--
|
|
|
|
BB-/Positive/--
|
|
|
|
|
|
--Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019--
|
|
|
(Mil. $)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
5,271.0
|
|
|
|
4,568.1
|
|
|
|
8,906.3
|
|
|
|
2,781.9
|
|
|
|
6,184.0
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
1,201.0
|
|
|
|
730.5
|
|
|
|
1,501.4
|
|
|
|
1,561.2
|
|
|
|
1,578.0
|
|
|
Funds from operations (FFO)
|
|
|
947.0
|
|
|
|
535.5
|
|
|
|
1,211.8
|
|
|
|
986.8
|
|
|
|
1,106.3
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
140.0
|
|
|
|
182.6
|
|
|
|
296.9
|
|
|
|
276.1
|
|
|
|
257.4
|
|
|
Cash interest paid
|
|
|
134.0
|
|
|
|
143.5
|
|
|
|
243.1
|
|
|
|
377.3
|
|
|
|
291.9
|
|
|
Cash flow from operations
|
|
|
976.0
|
|
|
|
701.9
|
|
|
|
1,153.5
|
|
|
|
656.5
|
|
|
|
906.1
|
|
|
Capital expenditure
|
|
|
557.0
|
|
|
|
551.7
|
|
|
|
1,243.7
|
|
|
|
329.4
|
|
|
|
868.7
|
|
|
Free operating cash flow (FOCF)
|
|
|
419.0
|
|
|
|
150.3
|
|
|
|
(90.2
|
)
|
|
|
327.0
|
|
|
|
37.4
|
|
Table 1
|
ICL Group Ltd.--Peer
Comparison (cont.)
|
|
|
Industry sector: Chemical companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICL Group Ltd.
|
|
|
K+S AG
|
|
|
The Mosaic Co.
|
|
|
Uralkali OJSC
|
|
|
EuroChem Group AG
|
|
|
Discretionary cash flow (DCF)
|
|
|
146.0
|
|
|
|
96.5
|
|
|
|
(307.3
|
)
|
|
|
316.9
|
|
|
|
(747.6
|
)
|
|
Cash and short-term investments
|
|
|
191.0
|
|
|
|
373.9
|
|
|
|
519.1
|
|
|
|
482.7
|
|
|
|
313.4
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
3,034.5
|
|
|
|
4,837.2
|
|
|
|
4,657.1
|
|
|
|
5,606.4
|
|
|
|
5,828.4
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
4,061.0
|
|
|
|
5,044.3
|
|
|
|
9,367.6
|
|
|
|
2,105.5
|
|
|
|
4,983.1
|
|
|
Adjusted ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA margin (%)
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
56.1
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
Return on capital (%)
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
EBITDA interest coverage (x)
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
FFO cash interest coverage (x)
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
Debt/EBITDA (x)
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
FFO/debt (%)
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
Cash flow from operations/debt (%)
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
FOCF/debt (%)
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
DCF/debt (%)
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)
|
We compare ICL with business peers operating in the potash and phosphate fertilizer industry, such as K+S AG,
Uralkali OJSC, EuroChem Group AG, and Mosaic Co. ICL's adjusted EBITDA margins have historically lagged those of Eurochem, which benefits from a first-quartile position in phosphate, thanks to access to lower gas prices for Russian producers and a
high degree of vertical integration. In comparison with K+S, ICL displays higher margins, reflecting its highly advantageous cost position in potash given its access to high quality raw materials in the Dead Sea, and notwithstanding its high cost
position in Spain. By comparison, K+S' profitability has been declining in recent years due to production challenges and the high cost position of its German mines. Overall, the EBITDA margins of ICL, K+S, and Eurochem contrast with Uralkali's
superior margins. The latter has large and very low-cost reserves, which position it as the leader on the global cost curve.
Chart 6
Business Risk: Satisfactor y
Our assessment of ICL's business risk reflects its position as the sixth-largest global potash
producer--a market with continuously increasing demand and few players--and the largest global bromine producer. ICL's business position is underpinned by its inherent advantages, including direct access to a concentrated source of unique
high-quality raw materials in the Dead Sea; a good cost position of potash and bromine mining compared with competitors; low storage costs and easier inventory maintenance, due to the dry weather in the Dead Sea area; proximity to ports and
strategic clients (notably China and India); and a synergy between the manufacturing processes for different specialty chemicals products.
Our view of ICL's business is further supported by its wide geographic sales spread, which we
believe reduces its exposure to demand shifts due to regional factors (like extreme weather), and by a diversified portfolio of products used in many industries.
ICL's main business risk relates to its dependence on the extension of its Dead Sea concession
by the Israeli government in 2030, and its exposure to political pressures and regulatory changes, because it translates into uncertainty as to whether the business will continue in its current form beyond 2030. There are currently no firm
developments in this area. We also note that ICL's position in the commodity phosphate market is weaker than that of peers, for example OCP S.A. or Phosagro PJSC, due to the relatively low quality of the phosphate rock mined in the Negev Desert in
Israel, high production costs, and the lack of an alternative mining site as reserves at the current site are dwindling.
Our view on ICL's business is further constrained by the highly cyclical nature of the
fertilizer industry. This cyclicality reflects the industry's changing supply-demand balance, which is difficult to predict as it depends on fertilizer price expectations, harvests, the crop mix, farmers' earnings (which depend on crop prices),
the weather, and inventory levels. New supply tends to come on stream and higher cost capacities are curtailed. Political decisions influence both demand and supply, through export allowances or taxes and subsidies in various core markets,
especially in India and China.
ICL's ongoing shift from the production of commodity fertilizers to value-added complementary
products is an important strategic step to help it stabilize profits through the cycle. It is also continuing its cost efficiency programs at the phosphate mines in China, the production ramp up at the polysulphate mine in England, and
consolidation of the mines in Spain. The company is also committing capex to improve capacity, lower production costs, and meet regulatory requirements.
Financial Risk: Significant
Our assessment of ICL's financial risk reflects the cyclical nature of the fertilizer industry,
which historically--and as for peers--has led to significant volatility in ICL's adjusted EBITDA. We also factor in ICL's investment needs, which mainly include maintenance capex and obligations to the Israeli government as part of the Dead Sea
concession (including the salt harvest project). We also factor in ICL's balanced financial policy, notably with regard to dividend distributions to the parent company, Israel Corp, and to all other shareholders. Over the medium term, ICL's
strategy is to enhance its market positions across three core mineral value chains in bromine, potash, and phosphate, as well as expanding its Innovative Ag Solutions business. We understand that the company will execute its growth strategy via
bolt-on acquisitions, organic investments, ramp-up of specialty fertilizer products such as polysulphate, innovation through new product development, and new applications for existing products.
At the same time, ICL is committed to the current rating and to maintaining prudent leverage.
Management demonstrated this commitment in 2018, when it used net proceeds of about $900 million from the sale of a fire safety unit to repay about $800 million of debt. The deleveraging was further followed by ICL's board of directors' decision to
revise the dividend distribution policy to about 50% of adjusted net income from 70% in 2016.
Under our base-case scenario, we forecast that adjusted debt to EBITDA will be 3.2x-3.4x in
2020, compared with 2.5x in 2019. We don't anticipate any material transactions, with only $27 million outflow for a bolt-on acquisitions of Growers Holdings Inc. in February 2020. Based on reported EBITDA of $900 million-$940 million, capex of
about $570 million, and modest working capital outflows, we estimate that ICL will generate $80 million-$120 million of free operating cash flow (FOCF) in 2020. We forecast that FOCF will recover to more than $200 million in 2021, but remain lower
than the over $400 million the company generated in 2019.
The fertilizer industry's cyclicality is a structural constraint to its financial risk because it translates into
volatility in profits outside of the company's control, as well as large seasonal working capital swings. ICL's track record of navigating the business through the cycle and prudent financial policy are important mitigating factors.
|
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
|
JUNE 29, 2020 13
|
Financial summary
Table 2
|
ICL Group Ltd.--Financial Summary
|
|
Industry sector: Chemical companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--Fiscal year ended Dec. 31--
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
(Mil. $)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
5,271.0
|
|
|
|
5,556.0
|
|
|
|
5,418.0
|
|
|
|
5,363.0
|
|
|
|
5,405.0
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
1,201.0
|
|
|
|
1,181.0
|
|
|
|
1,087.0
|
|
|
|
1,006.5
|
|
|
|
1,224.9
|
|
|
Funds from operations (FFO)
|
|
|
947.0
|
|
|
|
981.8
|
|
|
|
810.7
|
|
|
|
776.0
|
|
|
|
1,086.8
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
140.0
|
|
|
|
165.2
|
|
|
|
175.3
|
|
|
|
187.5
|
|
|
|
132.1
|
|
|
Cash interest paid
|
|
|
134.0
|
|
|
|
143.2
|
|
|
|
149.3
|
|
|
|
146.5
|
|
|
|
118.1
|
|
|
Cash flow from operations
|
|
|
976.0
|
|
|
|
631.8
|
|
|
|
859.7
|
|
|
|
987.0
|
|
|
|
595.8
|
|
|
Capital expenditure
|
|
|
557.0
|
|
|
|
550.0
|
|
|
|
434.0
|
|
|
|
610.0
|
|
|
|
598.0
|
|
|
Free operating cash flow (FOCF)
|
|
|
419.0
|
|
|
|
81.8
|
|
|
|
425.7
|
|
|
|
377.0
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
Discretionary cash flow (DCF)
|
|
|
146.0
|
|
|
|
(159.2
|
)
|
|
|
188.7
|
|
|
|
215.0
|
|
|
|
(350.2
|
)
|
|
Cash and short-term investments
|
|
|
191.0
|
|
|
|
213.0
|
|
|
|
173.0
|
|
|
|
116.0
|
|
|
|
248.0
|
|
|
Gross available cash
|
|
|
161.0
|
|
|
|
183.0
|
|
|
|
146.0
|
|
|
|
96.0
|
|
|
|
248.0
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
3,034.5
|
|
|
|
3,044.0
|
|
|
|
3,959.9
|
|
|
|
4,052.0
|
|
|
|
3,883.1
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
4,061.0
|
|
|
|
3,915.0
|
|
|
|
2,930.0
|
|
|
|
2,659.0
|
|
|
|
3,188.0
|
|
Reconciliation
Table 3
|
ICL Group Ltd.--Reconciliation Of Reported Amounts With S&P Global Ratings' Adjusted Amounts (Mil. $)
|
|
|
|
--Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019--
|
|
|
ICL Group Ltd. reported amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Shareholders' equity
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
S&P Global Ratings' adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
Cash flow from operations
|
|
|
Capital expenditure
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
2,301.0
|
|
|
|
3,925.0
|
|
|
|
1,189.0
|
|
|
|
756.0
|
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
|
|
1,201.0
|
|
|
|
992.0
|
|
|
|
576.0
|
|
|
S&P Global Ratings' adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash taxes paid
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(120.0
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Cash interest paid
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(115.0
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Reported lease liabilities
|
|
|
300.0
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Postretirement benefit obligations/deferred compensation
|
|
|
439.0
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Accessible cash and liquid investments
|
|
|
(161.0
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
(19.0
|
)
|
|
|
(19.0
|
)
|
|
|
(19.0
|
)
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Table 3
|
ICL
Group Ltd.--Reconciliation Of Reported Amounts With S&P Global Ratings' Adjusted Amounts (Mil. $) (cont.)
|
|
Dividends received from equity investments
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Asset-retirement obligations
|
|
|
155.5
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Nonoperating income
(expense)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Reclassification of interest and dividend cash flows
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest/minority interest
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
136.0
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
EBITDA: Other
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: Asset valuation gains/(losses)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
733.5
|
|
|
|
136.0
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
(254.0
|
)
|
|
|
(16.0
|
)
|
|
|
(19.0
|
)
|
|
S&P Global Ratings' adjusted amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Funds from
|
|
|
Cash flow from
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
expense
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
expenditure
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
3,034.5
|
|
|
|
4,061.0
|
|
|
|
1,201.0
|
|
|
|
752.0
|
|
|
|
140.0
|
|
|
|
947.0
|
|
|
|
976.0
|
|
|
|
557.0
|
|
Liquidity: Adequate
ICL's liquidity is adequate. Our assessment of ICL's liquidity reflects our expectation that the ratio of sources and uses will be
around 1.4x in the 12 months from March 31, 2020. Our assessment is underpinned by the company's prudent liquidity management, sufficient unutilized committed credit lines, and good access to the banking system and the Israeli capital markets.
Principal liquidity sources
• Available unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of about $500 million on March 31, 2020. We
note that cash balances were boosted by the preventative drawing of $300 million under ICL's committed revolving credit facility (RCF) in March 2020;
• Availability of about $590 million under a $1.1 billion long-term RCF maturing beyond one year;
• Our forecast of reported cash FFO of $720 million-$740 million; and
• About $110 million in proceeds from the issuance of a bond in May 2020.
Principal liquidity uses
• Short-term debt maturities of about $606 million;
• Capex of $550 million-$560 million;
• Working capital outflows (including intrayear) of about $50 million; and
• Dividend distribution of about $120 million.
Covenant Analysis
We forecast comfortable headroom under the covenants incorporated in ICL's debt agreements. These include:
• Total shareholders' equity greater than $2 billion;
• EBITDA net interest cover ratio equal to, or greater than 3.5x;
• Net financial debt to EBITDA less than 3.5x; and
• Ratio of certain subsidiaries loans to total consolidated assets of less than 10%.
Environmental, Social, And Governance
|
|
|
|
We see ESG credit factors for ICL as more exposed in comparison with industry peers', given that it
operates a unique natural resource asset in a region facing water scarcity and significant geopolitical tensions. The company conducts its Dead Sea operations under a concession agreement with the Israeli government.
|
|
|
The minerals from the Dead Sea are produced by means of solar evaporation, in which salt sinks to the
bottom of one of the pools. As a result of this process, raising the water above a certain level may cause damage to the foundations and hotel buildings located near the shoreline and to other infrastructure on the beach. ICL also draws
water from the northern basin of the Dead Sea and transfers it to pools at the southern part of the sea. As a result, the water level has decreased in the Dead Sea's northern basin over the years, most recently at an average annual rate
of about 110 centimeters, leading to the creation of sinkholes.
|
|
|
We note that ICL's share of responsibility for the Dead Sea's water depletion is about 23%, with the
balance due to evaporation, increased use of upstream water by neighboring countries (including Israel), and less rain in general. Over the longer term, we believe this situation may create pressure on ICL to reduce its use of Dead Sea
minerals, which could have an adverse effect on its business.
|
|
|
In addition, ICL is exposed to lawsuits in connection with malfunctions at its plants resulting in an
ecological environmental impact. For example, in 2017, a pool used to store water gypsum formed in production processes in the Negev collapsed. This event led to severe environmental pollution. Class action suits were filed against ICL
and it was required to bear long-term costs relating to rehabilitation programs. Such costs are hard to predict but could influence the financial and credit metrics of the company if incurred.
|
Group Influence
ICL is 45.9% owned by Israel Corp., whose shares are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. The balance of shares are owned by
institutional and public investors and traded on the Tel Aviv and the New York Stock Exchanges.
Israel Corp's asset portfolio is dominated by its controlling stake in ICL (about 88% of Israel Corp's portfolio value as of May 31,
2020). It is also the major shareholder of Oil Refineries Ltd. (ORL), an Israel-based energy company (about 12% of its portfolio value).
Israel Corp.'s main source of cash for its debt service are the dividends from ICL, bearing in mind that ORL's dividends are relatively
limited. Notwithstanding this status, we view ICL's credit quality as insulated from the estimated credit quality of Israel Corp. due to relatively strong Israeli legislative and regulatory protection frameworks, where both companies are
incorporated. We recognize that five out of 10 board members of ICL are independent, and five are nominated by Israel Corp.
That said, we understand that Israel Corp.'s stated strategy is to expand its holding portfolio to new industries, through
acquisitions. While the implementation of this strategy may take time and could be delayed due to COVID-19, we understand from management that it will not lead to an increase in net debt over time. In our view, this represents an important area of
uncertainty with regard to the credit quality of the parent, notwithstanding our view of ICL's insulation.
Issue Ratings--Subordination Risk Analysis
Capital str ucture
ICL's capital structure consists primarily of senior unsecured debt issued at the parent or 100%-owned financing entity level. There is
no material secured debt.
Analytical conclusions
ICL's debt is rated 'BBB-', the same as the issuer credit rating, because ICL does not have any material secured debt, limiting the
risk of subordination for lenders of unsecured debt.
Ratings Score Snapshot
Issuer Credit Rating
Foreign Currency: BBB-/Stable/--
Business risk: Satisfactory
● Country risk: Intermediate
● Industry risk: Intermediate
● Competitive position: Satisfactory
Financial risk: Significant
● Cash flow/leverage: Significant
Anchor: bbb-
Modifiers
● Diversification/portfolio effect: Neutral (no impact)
● Capital str ucture: Neutral (no impact)
● Financial policy: Neutral (no impact)
● Liquidity: Adequate (no impact)
● Management and gover nance: Fair (no impact)
● Comparable rating analysis: Neutral (no impact)
Related Criteria
• General Criteria: Group Rating Methodology, July 1, 2019
• Criteria | Corporates | General: Corporate Methodology: Ratios And Adjustments, April 1, 2019
• General Criteria: Methodology For National And Regional Scale Credit Ratings, June 25, 2018
• Criteria | Corporates | General: Reflecting Subordination Risk In Corporate Issue Ratings, March 28, 2018
• Criteria | Corporates | General: Methodology And Assumptions: Liquidity Descriptors For Global
Corporate Issuers, Dec. 16, 2014
• General Criteria: Country Risk Assessment Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 19, 2013
• Criteria | Corporates | General: Corporate Methodology, Nov. 19, 2013
• General Criteria: Methodology: Industry Risk, Nov. 19, 2013
• General Criteria: Methodology: Timeliness Of Payments: Grace Periods, Guarantees, And Use Of 'D' And 'SD' Ratings, Oct. 24, 2013
• General Criteria: Methodology: Management And Governance Credit Factors For Corporate Entities, Nov. 13, 2012
• General Criteria: Use Of CreditWatch And Outlooks, Sept. 14, 2009
|
Business And Financial Risk Matrix
|
|
Business Risk Profile
|
Financial Risk Profile
|
|
Minimal
|
Modest
|
Intermediate
|
Significant
|
Aggressive
|
Highly leveraged
|
|
Excellent
|
aaa/aa+
|
aa
|
a+/a
|
a-
|
bbb
|
bbb-/bb+
|
|
Strong
|
aa/aa-
|
a+/a
|
a-/bbb+
|
bbb
|
bb+
|
bb
|
|
Satisfactory
|
a/a-
|
bbb+
|
bbb/bbb-
|
bbb-/bb+
|
bb
|
b+
|
|
Fair
|
bbb/bbb-
|
bbb-
|
bb+
|
bb
|
bb-
|
b
|
|
Weak
|
bb+
|
bb+
|
bb
|
bb-
|
b+
|
b/b-
|
|
Vulnerable
|
bb-
|
bb-
|
bb-/b+
|
b+
|
b
|
b-
|
Ratings Detail (As Of June 29, 2020)*
|
|
ICL Group Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer Credit Rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency
|
|
|
|
BBB-/Stable/--
|
|
|
|
Senior Unsecured
|
|
|
|
BBB-
|
|
|
|
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
|
JUNE 29, 2020 18
|
Copyright © 2020 by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof
(Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates
(collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not
guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the
Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no
event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost
profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not
statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any
security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees,
advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be
reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating- related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily
dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain
regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an
acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective
activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information
received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P
reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed
through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
STANDARD & POOR’S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC.
|
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
|
JUNE 29, 2020 20
|
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
ICL Group Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Kobi Altman
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Kobi Altman
|
|
|
|
|
Title: Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
ICL Group Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Aya Landman
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Aya Landman
|
|
|
|
|
Title: Global Company Secretary
|
|
Date: June 29, 2020