SNES SenesTech Inc

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 1 - Organization and Description of Business

SenesTech, Inc. (“SenesTech,” the “Company,” “we” or “us”) was formed in July 2004 and incorporated in the state of Nevada. The Company subsequently reincorporated in the state of Delaware in November 2015. Our corporate headquarters is in Flagstaff, Arizona. We have developed and are commercializing a global, proprietary technology for managing animal pest populations, primarily rat populations, through fertility control.

Pest management professionals (“PMPs”) continue to face challenges in controlling infestations. While there are many tools to bring rat populations down quickly, they are at a disadvantage: they do not prevent the rapid reproduction, leaving PMPs and their customers open to a possible rebound in rat population.

ContraPest ^® is a proven fertility control solution that complements integrated pest management (“IPM”) protocols to bring rat populations down and keep them down.* Without fertility control, rat populations can rebound, but ContraPest, targets the reproductive capabilities in Norway and roof rats to minimize these population spikes and keep rat populations down more effectively.

Additionally, PMPs are being increasingly asked for new solutions to help them solve their customers’ toughest rat infestations. With growing interest in non-lethal options, it is becoming increasingly important for PMPs to have proven non-lethal tools at their disposable. ContraPest can help PMPs expand their service offering and serve customers that are looking to decrease or eliminate the amount of lethal rat control methodologies.

Our flagship fertility control product, ContraPest is a liquid fertility control bait containing the active ingredients 4-vinylcyclohexene diepoxide (“VCD”) and triptolide. When consumed, ContraPest targets reproduction, limiting fertility in male and female Norway and roof rats beginning with initial consumption. ContraPest can be deployed in either the JT Eaton Rat Fortress (903TP) or the Bell Labs EVO PROTECA Express bait stations, giving PMPs flexibility in their site deployments. We submitted ContraPest for registration with the EPA on August 23, 2015, and the EPA granted registration approval for ContraPest effective August 2, 2016. We expect to continue to pursue regulatory approvals and amendments to existing registration in the United States for ContraPest, including additional species and additional jurisdictions.

We believe ContraPest is the first and only non-lethal, fertility control product approved by the EPA for the management of rat populations. In addition to the EPA registration of ContraPest in the U.S., we must obtain registration from the various state regulatory agencies prior to being used in each state. We have received registration for ContraPest in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The EPA also approved the removal of Restricted Use Pesticide (“RUP”) designation from the ContraPest ^® label in October 2018. SenesTech is currently in the approval process for individual state approval of this new designation.

Besides providing just the product, SenesTech provides PMPs with product training, and supports the PMPs by creating tools, training and awareness campaigns to help inform their customers, specifically within the food safety industry and larger residential customers, such as Home Owners Associations (“HOAs”), on the benefits of including ContraPest into their IPM protocols.

*When used as directed. ContraPest ^® is a Restricted Use Pesticide, due to applicator expertise. Read and follow all label instructions. Target species: Norway and roof rats.

Potential Need for Additional Capital

Since our inception, we have sustained significant operating losses in the course of our research and development activities, and expect such losses to continue for the near future. We have generated limited revenue to date from product sales, research grants and licensing fees received under our former license agreement with Neogen. In 2017, we began to prepare and launch commercialization of our first product, ContraPest. We have funded our operations to date through the sale of equity securities, including convertible preferred stock, common stock and warrants to purchase common stock. Such sales include:

We have also raised capital through debt financing, consisting primarily of convertible notes; and, to a lesser extent, payments received in connection with product sales, research grants and licensing fees.

Through September 30, 2018, we had received net proceeds of $61.7 million from our sales of common stock, preferred stock and warrant exercises and issuance of convertible and other promissory notes, an aggregate of $1.7 million from licensing fees and an aggregate of $0.2 million in product sales. At September 30, 2018, we had an accumulated deficit of $83.2 million and cash and cash equivalents and highly liquid investments of $7.2 million. 

Our ultimate success depends upon the outcome of a combination of factors, including: (i) successful commercialization of ContraPest and ongoing regulatory approvals of our other product candidates encompassing market acceptance, commercial viability and profitability of ContraPest and other products; (ii) our ability to retain and attract key personnel to develop, operate and grow our business; and (iii) our ability to meet our working capital needs. 

Based upon our current operating plan, we expect that cash and cash equivalents and highly liquid, short term investments at September 30, 2018, in combination with anticipated revenue, will be sufficient to fund our current operations for at least the next 12 months. However, if anticipated revenue targets and margin targets are not achieved, we may seek to reduce operating expenses and are likely to require additional capital in order to fund our operating losses and research and development activities until we become profitable. We may never achieve profitability or generate positive cash flows, and unless and until we do, we will continue to need to raise capital through equity or debt financing. If such equity or debt financing is not available at adequate levels or on acceptable terms, we may need to delay, limit or terminate commercialization and development efforts. 

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements of the Company have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial reporting. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the Company’s opinion, the unaudited condensed financial statements include all material adjustments, all of which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of September 30, 2018, the Company’s operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, and the Company’s cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. The accompanying financial information as of December 31, 2017 is derived from audited financial statements. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended for the year ended December 31, 2017. All amounts shown in these financial statements and accompanying notes are in thousands, except percentages and per share and share amounts.

SENESTECH, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and classification of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The significant estimates in the Company’s financial statements include the valuation of preferred stock, common stock and related warrants, and other stock-based awards. Actual results could differ from such estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no material impact on net earnings, financial position or cash flows.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers money market fund investments to be cash equivalents. The Company had such cash equivalents of $21 and $3 at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, included in cash as reported.

Investments in Securities

The Company uses cash holdings to purchase highly liquid, short term, investment grade securities diversified among security types, industries and issuers. All of the Company’s investment securities are measured at fair value. The Company’s investment securities primarily consist of municipal debt securities, corporate bonds, U.S. agency securities and commercial paper and highly-liquid money market funds.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable consist entirely of trade receivables. The Company provides an allowance for doubtful trade receivables equal to the estimated uncollectible amounts. That estimate is based on historical collection experience, current economic and market conditions and a review of the current status of each customer’s trade accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful trade receivables was less than $1 as of September 30, 2018 and $0 at December 31, 2017.

Deferred Offering Costs

Deferred offering costs consisted primarily of legal, accounting and other direct and incremental fees and costs related to the Rights Offering that closed on August 13, 2018 and the downward price adjustment that occurred to certain outstanding warrants as a result of the Rights Offering. Total deferred offering costs of $1.0 million were offset against the proceeds received from the Rights Offering during the quarter ending September 30, 2018. There were no deferred offering costs at September 30, 2018 or December 31, 2017.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value, using the first-in, first-out convention. Inventories consist of raw materials, work in process and finished goods.

SENESTECH, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)

Prepaid Expenses

Prepaid expenses consist primarily of payments made for director compensation as well as payments made for director and officer insurance, rent and legal deposits to be expensed in the current year.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Equipment held under capital leases are stated at the present value of minimum lease payments less accumulated amortization.

Depreciation on property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. The cost of leasehold improvements is amortized over the life of the improvement or the term of the lease, whichever is shorter. Equipment held under capital leases is amortized over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life of the asset. The Company incurs repair and maintenance costs on its major equipment, which are expensed as incurred.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require long-lived assets or asset groups to be tested for possible impairment, the Company compares the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the use of the asset or asset group to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, an impairment charge is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flow models and the use of third-party independent appraisals. The Company has not recorded an impairment of long-lived assets since its inception.

Revenue Recognition

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 — Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Under ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue from the commercial sales of products, licensing agreements and contracts to perform pilot studies by applying the following steps: (1) identify the contract with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when each performance obligation is satisfied. For the comparative periods, revenue has not been adjusted and continues to be reported under ASC 605 — Revenue Recognition. Under ASC 605, revenue is recognized when the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) the performance of service has been rendered to a customer or delivery has occurred; (3) the amount of the fee to be paid by a customer is fixed and determinable; and (4) the collectability of the fee is reasonably assured. The performance obligations identified by the Company under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue From Contracts With Customers, are straightforward and similar to the unit of account and performance obligation determination under ASC Topic 605,  Revenue Recognition . There was no impact on the Company’s financial statements as a result of adopting ASC 606 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, or the twelve months ended December 31, 2017.

The Company recognizes revenue when it leaves their facility at a fixed selling price and payment terms of 30 to 60 days from invoicing.

SENESTECH, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)  

All of the revenue recognized in the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 is from the sale of Contrapest.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses primarily consist of salaries and benefits for research and development employees, stock-based compensation, consulting fees, lab supplies, costs incurred related to conducting scientific trials and field studies, and regulatory compliance costs. Also, included in research and development expenses is an allocation of facilities related costs, including depreciation of research and development equipment.

Stock-based Compensation

Employee stock-based awards, consisting of restricted stock units and stock options expected to be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock, are recorded as equity awards. The grant date fair value of these awards is measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company expenses the grant date fair value of its stock options on a straight-line basis over their respective vesting periods. Performance-based awards are expensed over the performance period when the related performance goals are probable of being achieved.

For equity instruments issued to non-employees, the stock-based consideration is measured using a fair value method. The measurement of the stock-based compensation is subject to re-measurement as the underlying equity instruments vest.

The stock-based compensation expense recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, is as follows:

See Note 13 for additional discussion on stock-based compensation.

SENESTECH, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities and net operating loss carryforwards using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent it believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. These deferred tax assets are subject to periodic assessments as to recoverability and if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the benefits will not be realized, valuation allowances are recorded which would increase the provision for income taxes. In making such determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations.

The Company applies a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold for all tax uncertainties. Only those benefits that have a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities are recognized. Based on its evaluation, the Company has concluded there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in its financial statements.

The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. There are no uncertain tax positions as of September 30, 2018 or December 31, 2017 and as such, no interest or penalties were recorded in income tax expense.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Job Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”). SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the date of enactment for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740, Income Taxes. The Company is still analyzing the Tax Act and the impact, if any, it will have.

Comprehensive Loss

Net loss and comprehensive loss were the same for all periods presented; therefore, a separate statement of comprehensive loss is not included in the accompanying financial statements.

Loss Per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders

Basic loss per share attributable to common stockholders is calculated by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares and potentially dilutive securities outstanding for the period determined using the treasury stock and if-converted methods. For purposes of the computation of diluted loss per share attributable to common stockholders, common stock purchase warrants, and common stock options are considered to be potentially dilutive securities but have been excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share attributable to common stockholders because their effect would be anti-dilutive given the net loss reported for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. Therefore, basic and diluted loss per share attributable to common stockholders are the same for each period presented.

SENESTECH, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Adoption of New Accounting Standards:

In May 2014 the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers . Since ASU 2014-09 was issued, several additional ASUs have been issued to clarify various elements of the guidance. These standards provide guidance on recognizing revenue, including a five-step model to determine when revenue recognition is appropriate. The standard requires that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” using the modified retrospective method to all contracts that were not completed as of the date of adoption. The results of operations for reported periods after January 1, 2018 are presented under this amended guidance, while prior period amounts are reported in accordance with ASC 605 — Revenue Recognition . There was no material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. See Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Revenue Recognition.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments . The amendments in this ASU provide guidance on the following eight specific cash flow classification issues: (1) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; (2) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing; (3) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; (4) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; (5) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies; (6) distributions received from equity method investees; (7) beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and (8) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. The amendments of this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-15 on its financial statements. There was no material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

SENESTECH, INC. 

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). This standard affects the accounting for equity instruments, financial liabilities under the fair value option and the presentation and disclosure requirements of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective the first quarter of 2018. The Company has adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-01 on its financial statements. There was no material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted:

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”). This standard amends various aspects of existing accounting guidance for leases, including the recognition of a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. This standard also introduces new disclosure requirements for leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years for public business entities. Early adoption is permitted and the new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach, and provides for certain practical expedients. At September 30, 2018, the Company had future minimum lease payments on its operating leases of $282 that would be recorded as a capital lease liability on its balance sheet. The Company plans to adopt ASU 2016-02 on its financial statements and related disclosures at December 31, 2018.

SENESTECH, INC. 

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 3 - Fair Value Measurements

We invest in various short term, highly liquid financial instruments, which may include municipal debt securities, corporate bonds, U.S. agency securities and commercial paper. We value these instruments at fair value. The accounting guidance for fair value, among other things, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure for each major asset and liability category measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the reporting date. The framework for measuring fair value consists of a three-level valuation hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value based upon whether such inputs are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect market assumptions made by the reporting entity. The three-level hierarchy for the inputs to valuation techniques is briefly summarized as follows:  

Level 1 —Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date;

Level 2 —Inputs are observable, unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities; and

Level 3 —Unobservable inputs that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities that are supported by little or no market data.

An asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques:

The Company’s cash equivalents, which include money market funds, are classified as Level 1 because they are valued using quoted market prices. The Company’s marketable securities consist of securities and are generally classified as Level 2 because their value is based on valuations using significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data.

In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around the inputs to valuation, securities are classified as Level 3. Level 3 liabilities consist of common stock warrant liability.

SENESTECH, INC. 

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(1) The change in the fair value of the common stock warrant and convertible notes payable for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 was recorded as a decrease to other income (expense) and interest expense of $1 and $1, respectively, in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, including accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate fair value due to their short maturities. The estimated fair value of notes payable, not recorded at fair value, are recorded at cost or amortized cost which was deemed to estimate fair value.

SENESTECH, INC. 

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 4 - Investments in Securities

As of September 30, 2018, investment in securities primarily consisted of corporate fixed income securities. These investments are in short term, highly liquid investments which are recorded at cost plus or minus market fluctuation and gains and losses are recognized as the sale or redemption of the securities is realized. Gains and losses are included in non-operating other income (expense) on the condensed statement of operations and are derived using the specific identification method for determining the cost of the securities sold. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company recorded $12 and $44 net gain (loss) on investments recorded, respectively. Interest and dividends on investment securities are included in interest and other income, net, in the condensed statements of operations. 

The following is a summary of investment in securities at September 30, 2018:

SENESTECH, INC. 

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

* Shorter of lease term or estimated useful life

Depreciation expense was approximately $108 and $118 for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $332 and $272 for nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

SENESTECH, INC. 

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Capital Lease Obligations 

Capital lease obligations are for computer and lab equipment leased through GreatAmerica Financial Services, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Navitas Credit Corp., Wells Fargo and ENGS Commercial Finance Co. These capital leases expire at various dates through July 2023 and carry interest rates ranging from 6.0% to 11.6%.

Other Promissory Notes

Also included in the table above are three notes payable to Direct Capital, one note to M2 Financing and one note to Fidelity Capital, all for the financing of fixed assets. These notes expire at various dates through June 2022 and carry interest rates ranging from 4.3% to 13.8%.

In April 2013, the Company and a previous employee entered into an agreement to settle all outstanding obligations consisting of a promissory note of $40, dated March 2009, and deferred salaries amounting to $72. The note and salary obligation had an interest at 8% and 4.25%, respectively. The note required monthly payments of $1 and matured in May 2018, but the final disbursement was not made until July 2018. The deferred salary obligation required monthly payments of $1 and matured in June 2018, with final payment also made in July 2018.

Amounts outstanding on these obligations were $0 and $12 at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Interest expense on the notes payable, related parties, was $0 for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and $1 for the year ended December 31, 2017 respectively.

         SENESTECH, INC. 

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(1) The common stock warrants issued in November 2017 with an initial exercise price of $1.50 per share adjusted downward to $0.95 per share effective July 24, 2018 in connection with our Rights Offering, and may be subject to further downward adjustments, pursuant to antidilution price adjustment protection contained within those warrants.

On November 21, 2017, the Company issued a total of 4,657,500 detachable common stock warrants issued with the second public offering of 5,860,000 shares of its common stock at $1.00 per share. The common stock warrant is exercisable until five years from the date of grant. The common shares of the Company’s stock and detachable warrants exist independently as separate securities. As such, the Company estimated the fair value of the common stock warrants, exercisable at $1.50 per share, to be $661 using a lattice model based on the following significant inputs: Common stock price of $1.00; comparable company volatility of 73.8%; remaining term 5 years; dividend yield of 0% and risk-free interest rate of 1.87. The initial exercise price of these warrants was $1.50 per share, which adjusted downward to $1.47 on July 24, 2018, the record date of the Right’s Offering and downward to $0.95 per share on August 13, 2018, the date of the Rights Offering, pursuant to antidilution price adjustment protection contained within these warrants.

Per guidance of ASC 260, the Company recorded a deemed dividend of $333 on the 3,181,841 unexercised warrants that contained this antidilution price adjustment protection provision and was calculated as the difference between the fair value of the warrants immediately prior to downward exercise price adjustment and immediately after the adjustment using a Black Scholes model based on the following significant inputs: On July 24, 2018: Common stock price of $1.38; comparable company volatility of 72.4%; remaining term 4.33 years; dividend yield of 0% and risk-free interest rate of 2.83%. On August 13, 2018: Common stock price of $1.02; comparable company volatility of 74.0%; remaining term 4.25 years; dividend yield of 0% and risk-free interest rate of 2.75%.

On June 20, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with a holder of 1,133,909 of the November 2017 warrants to exercise its original warrant representing 1,133,909 shares of Common Stock for cash at the $1.50 exercise price for gross proceeds of $1.7 million and the Company issued to holder a new warrant to purchase 1,133,909 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.82 per share. The new warrant did not contain the antidilution price adjustment protection that was contained within the exercised warrants. In June 2018, the Company recorded stock compensation expense of $1.7 million representing the fair value of the of 1,133,909 inducement warrants issued. The Company estimated the fair value of the common stock warrants, exercisable at $1.82 per share, to be $1.7 million using a Black Scholes model based on the following significant inputs: Common stock price of $2.11; comparable company volatility of 72.6%; remaining term 5 years; dividend yield of 0% and risk-free interest rate of 2.8%. Also in June 2018, an additional 341,750 of the November 8, 2017 warrants that were in the money at the time of exercise, were exercised for gross proceeds of $513.

On August 13, 2018, in connection with a Rights Offering of 5,357,052 shares of its common stock, the Company issued 5,357,052 warrants to purchase shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $1.15 per share. The Company estimated the fair value of the common stock warrants, exercisable at $1.15 per share, to be $3.6 million using a Monte Carlo model based on the following significant inputs: common stock price of $0.94; comparable company volatility of 159.0%; remaining term 5 years; dividend yield of 0% and risk-free interest rate of 2.77%.

In connection with the closing of the Rights Offering, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 267,853 shares of common stock to Maxim Partners LLC, an affiliate of the dealer-manager of the Rights Offering. The Company estimated the fair value of the common stock warrants, exercisable at $1.725 per share, to be $169 using a using a Monte Carlo model based on the following significant inputs: common stock price of $0.94; comparable company volatility of 159.0%; remaining term 5 years; dividend yield of 0% and risk-free interest rate of 2.77%.

SENESTECH, INC. 

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 10 - Common Stock Warrants and Common Stock Warrant Liability-continued

Common Stock Warrant Issued to Underwriter of Common Stock Offering

In November 2017, the Company issued to Roth Capital Partners, LLC, as underwriter, a warrant to purchase 945,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share as consideration for providing services in connection with our common stock offering. The warrant was fully vested and exercisable on the date of issuance. The common stock warrant is exercisable until five years from the date of grant. The Company estimated the fair value of the common stock warrants, exercisable at $1.50 per share, to be $134 using a lattice model based on the following significant inputs: Common stock price of $1.00; comparable company volatility of 73.8%; remaining term 5 years; dividend yield of 0% and risk-free interest rate of 1.87%.

University of Arizona Common Stock Warrant

In connection with the June 2015 amended and restated exclusive license agreement with the University of Arizona (“University”), the Company issued to the University a common stock warrant to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $7.50 per share. The warrant was fully vested and exercisable on the date of grant, and expires, if not exercised, five years from the date of grant. In the event of a “terminating change” of the Company, as defined in the warrant agreement, the warrant holder would be paid in cash the aggregate fair market value of the underlying shares immediately prior to the consummation of the terminating change event. Due to the cash settlement provision, the derivative warrant liability was recorded at fair value and is revalued at the end of each reporting period. The changes in fair value are reported in other income (expense) in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The estimated fair value of the derivative warrant liability was $53 at the date of grant.

The estimated fair value of the derivative warrant liability was $0 at September 30, 2018. As this derivative warrant liability is revalued at the end of each reporting period, the fair values as determined at the date of grant and subsequent periods was based on the following significant inputs using a Monte Carlo option pricing model: common stock price of $7.91; comparable company volatility of 77.7% of the underlying common stock; risk-free rates of 1.93%; and dividend yield of 0%; including the probability assessment of a terminating change event occurring. The change in fair value of the derivative warrant liability was $0 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and was recorded in other income (expense) in the accompanying statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Note 11 - Stockholders’ Deficit

Common Stock

The Company had 23,425,287 and 16,404,195 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company issued 7,021,092 shares of common stock as follows:

Rights Offering

On August 13, 2018, the Company closed a Rights Offering. Pursuant to the Rights Offering, the Company accepted subscriptions for 5,357,052 units for a purchase price of $1.15 per unit, with each unit consisting of one share of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and one warrant. Each warrant included in the unit was exercisable for one share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.15 per share. At closing of the Rights Offering, the Company issued 5,357,052 shares of its common stock and 5,357,052 warrants to purchase shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $1.15 per share. The Rights Offering generated net proceeds to the Company of approximately $5.1 million after the payment of fees and expenses related to the Rights Offering. In connection with the closing of the Rights Offering, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 267,853 shares of common stock to Maxim Partners LLC, an affiliate of the dealer-manager of the Rights Offering.

SENESTECH, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 12 - Stock-based Compensation 

On June 12, 2018, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”) to replace the Company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”). The 2018 Plan authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. In addition, up to 2,874,280 shares of our common stock currently reserved for issuance under the 2015 Plan became available for issuance under the 2018 Plan to the extent such shares were available for issuance under the 2015 Plan as of June 12, 2018 or cease to be subject to awards outstanding under the 2015 Plan, such as by expiration, cancellation, or forfeiture of such awards.

The stock-based awards are generally issued with a price equal to no less than fair value at the date of grant. Options granted under the 2018 Plan generally vest immediately, or ratably over a two- to 36-month period coinciding with their respective service periods; however, participants may exercise their options prior to vesting as provided by the 2018 Plan. Unvested shares issued for options exercised early may be subject to a repurchase by the Company if the participant terminates, at the original exercise price. Options under the 2018 Plan generally have a contractual term of five years. Certain stock option awards provide for accelerated vesting upon a change in control.

As of September 30, 2018, the Company had 1,860,375 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2018 Plan.

The Company measures the fair value of stock options with service-based and performance-based vesting criteria to employees, directors and consultants on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of equity instruments issued to non-employees is re-measured as the award vests. The Black-Scholes valuation model requires the Company to make certain estimates and assumptions, including assumptions related to the expected price volatility of the Company’s stock, the period under which the options will be outstanding, the rate of return on risk-free investments, and the expected dividend yield for the Company’s stock.

The weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model used to calculate the fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2018, were as follows:

Due to the Company’s limited operating history and lack of company-specific historical or implied volatility, the expected volatility assumption was determined based on historical volatilities from traded options of biotech companies of comparable in size and stability, whose share prices are publicly available. The expected term of options granted to employees is calculated based on the mid-point between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term according to the simplified method as described in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 110 because the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected term due to the limited period of time its awards have been outstanding. For non-employee options, the expected term of options granted is the contractual term of the options. The risk-free rate by reference to the implied yields of U.S. Treasury securities with a remaining term equal to the expected term assumed at the time of grant. The expected dividend assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation of dividend payouts. The Company has not paid and does not intend to pay dividends on its shares of capital stock.

SENESTECH, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

The stock-based compensation expense was recorded as follows:

The allocation between research and development and selling, general and administrative expense was based on the department and services performed by the employee or non-employee.

At September 30, 2018, the total compensation cost related to unvested options not yet recognized was $989, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 18 months, assuming the employees complete their service period required for vesting.

SENESTECH, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 13 - License and Other Agreements

Neogen Corporation

On January 23, 2017 we entered into a termination agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Neogen. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the parties agreed to (a) terminate the existing Exclusive License Agreement between us and Neogen dated May 15, 2014 (the “License Agreement”), with neither Neogen or us having any further obligations thereunder (other than certain confidentiality obligations); (b) dismiss with prejudice the court action filed by Neogen in the District Court for the District of Arizona on January 19, 2017 (the “Court Action”), as further described below; and (c) mutually release any and all existing or future claims between the parties and their affiliates related to or arising from the License Agreement or the Court Action. As part of the Settlement Agreement, we agreed to pay to Neogen upon the execution of the Settlement Agreement an aggregate of $1.0 million in settlement of all claims.

SENESTECH, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 13 - License and Other Agreements-continued

Bioceres/INMET S.A. Agreement

In January 2016, the Company entered into a services agreement with Bioceres, Inc. (“Bioceres”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bioceres S.A., a leading agricultural biotechnology company in Argentina, and its Argentinean subsidiary, Ingenieria Metabolica S.A. (“INMET”) to develop a production method for synthetic triptolide, the main ingredient in ContraPest. The Company also entered into an agency agreement with INMET whereby the Company appointed INMET as its exclusive agent to seek regulatory approval for and conduct pre-sales and marketing of its product, ContraPest, in Argentina. The Company and INMET also agreed to manufacture and distribute its product in Argentina and other countries, as mutually agreed, through a newly formed entity.

The initial term of the service agreement is for two years. The service agreement can be terminated at any time upon written notice by either party for any reason. The term of the agency agreement with INMET is the earlier of: (i) when the Company and INMET incorporate the joint venture entity in Argentina or (ii) January 2018. These agreements were renewed for an additional year, through January 2019.

Note 14 - Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

The Company may be subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from contracts or other matters from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Management is not aware of any pending or threatened litigation where the ultimate disposition or resolution could have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

On February 20, 2018, New Enterprises, Ltd. (“New Enterprises”), filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona against the Company and Roth Capital Partners, LLC. The suit alleges nine counts against the Company, including that the Company engaged in common law fraud and securities fraud to induce the chairman of New Enterprises into investing in the Company; that the Company breached the lock-up agreement and tortiously interfered with prospective business advantage. New Enterprises is seeking monetary damages, including compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees. New Enterprises has also named Roth Capital Partners, LLC as a co-defendant. Pursuant to our underwriting agreement with Roth Capital Partners, LLC, the Company may be required to indemnify Roth Capital Partners, LLC for liabilities arising out of our initial public offering. The Company believes there is no basis to any of the claims, and intends to vigorously defend itself, including seeking appropriate counterclaims.

SENESTECH, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 14 - Commitments and Contingencies-continued

Lease Commitments

Rent expense was $183 and $246 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively. The future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating lease and future minimum capital lease payments as of September 30, 2018 are as follows: