Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note
1 – Description of Business
Surna
Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Nevada on October 15, 2009. The Company develops innovative technologies
and products that monitor, control and or address the energy and resource intensive nature of indoor cannabis cultivation. Currently,
the Company’s revenue stream is derived primarily from supplying industrial technology and products to commercial indoor
cannabis cultivation facilities. Headquartered in Boulder, Colorado, the Company’s engineering and technical team provides
solutions that allow growers to meet the unique demands of a cannabis cultivation environment through precise temperature, humidity,
and process controls, energy and water efficiency, and satisfaction of the evolving code and regulatory requirements being imposed
at the state and local levels. The Company’s objective is to leverage its experience in this space in order to bring value-added
climate control solutions to its customers that help improve their overall crop quality and yield as well as optimize the resource
efficiency of their controlled environment (i.e,. indoor and greenhouses) cultivation facilities. The Company is not involved
in the growing, formulation or sale of cannabis products.
Note
2 – Basis of Presentation; Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Financial
Statement Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions
to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Pursuant to these rules and regulations, certain information and note disclosures,
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2017 has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date, but does not include all the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. The notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are presented
on a going concern basis.
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going
concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The
Company has experienced recurring losses since its inception. The Company incurred a net loss of approximately $3,928,000 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2018, and had an accumulated deficit of approximately $23,531,000 as of September 30, 2018.
Since inception, the Company has financed its activities principally through debt and equity financing and customer deposits.
Management expects to incur additional losses and cash outflows in the foreseeable future in connection with its operating activities.
The
Company is subject to a number of risks similar to those of other similar stage companies, including dependence on key individuals,
successful development, marketing and branding of products; uncertainty of product development and generation of revenues; dependence
on outside sources of financing; risks associated with research and development; dependence on third-party suppliers and collaborators;
protection of intellectual property; and competition with larger, better-capitalized companies. Ultimately, the attainment of
profitable operations is dependent on future events, including obtaining adequate financing to fulfill its development activities
and generating a level of revenues adequate to support the Company’s cost structure.
There
can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise debt or equity financing in sufficient amounts, when and if needed,
on acceptable terms or at all. If results of operations for 2018 do not meet management’s expectations, or additional capital
is not available, management believes it has the ability to reduce certain expenditures. The precise amount and timing of the
funding needs cannot be determined accurately at this time, and will depend on a number of factors, including the market demand
for the Company’s products and services, the quality of product development efforts, management of working capital, and
continuation of normal payment terms and conditions for purchase of the Company’s products. The Company believes its cash
balances and cash flow from operations will be insufficient to fund its operations for the next 12 months. If the Company is unable
to substantially increase revenues, reduce expenditures, or otherwise generate cash flows for operations, then the Company will
need to raise additional funding to continue as a going concern.
The
foregoing factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one
year from the date the financial statements are issued. These condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis
of Consolidation
The
condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its controlled and wholly-owned subsidiary,
Hydro Innovations, LLC (“Hydro”). Intercompany transactions, profit, and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and that affect the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results
of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Key estimates include: valuation of derivative liabilities,
valuation of intangible assets, valuation of equity-based compensation, valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, warranty
accruals, inventory allowances, AR reserves, and legal contingencies.
Fair
Value Measurement
The
Company records its financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The accounting standard for fair value provides a framework
for measuring fair value, clarifies the definition of fair value, and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Fair
value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the reporting date. The accounting standard establishes a three-tier hierarchy, which
prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:
Level
1 - inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level
2 - inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level
3 - inputs are unobservable inputs based on the Company’s assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value.
On
a Recurring Basis
A
financial asset’s or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level of input
that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to
the fair value measurement in its entirety requires management to make judgments and consider factors specific to the asset or
liability.
On
a Non-Recurring Basis
Intangible
assets that are amortized are evaluated for recoverability whenever adverse effects or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying value may not be recoverable. The recoverability test consists of comparing the undiscounted projected cash flows
with the carrying amount. Should the carrying amount exceed undiscounted projected cash flows, an impairment loss would be recognized
to the extent the carrying amount exceeds fair value.
For
the Company’s indefinite-lived goodwill, the impairment test consists of comparing the fair value, determined using the
market value method, with its carrying amount. An impairment loss would be recognized for the carrying amount in excess of its
fair value. The Company concluded that no impairment relating to intangible assets or goodwill existed at September 30, 2018.
Due
to their short-term nature, the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued
expenses, approximate fair value.
Revenue
Recognition
On
January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09 (Topic 606),
Revenue from Contracts
with Customers
and all the related amendments (“ASC 606” or the “new revenue standard”) to all contracts
and elected the modified retrospective method. The results for periods before 2018 were not adjusted for the new revenue standard
and the cumulative effect of the change in accounting was recognized through accumulated deficit at the date of adoption. The
comparative financial information presented has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards
in effect for those periods. The Company expects the impact of the adoption of the new revenue standard to be immaterial to its
net income (loss) on an ongoing basis.
The
cumulative effect of the changes made to the condensed consolidated balance sheet for the adoption of the new revenue standard
as of January 1, 2018 was as follows:
|
|
Balance
as of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
Adjustments
Due to
ASC 606
|
|
|
Balance
as of
January 1, 2018
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,011,871
|
|
|
$
|
(56,912
|
)
|
|
$
|
954,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
$
|
(19,254,911
|
)
|
|
$
|
56,912
|
|
|
$
|
(19,197,999
|
)
|
In
accordance with the new revenue standard’s requirements, the disclosure of the impact of adoption on the condensed consolidated
income statements and balance sheets for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 (including insignificant
true-up adjustments related to the first quarter of 2018 which have been reflected in the nine months ended September 30, 2018)
was as follows:
|
|
For
the Three Months Ended
Sept 30, 2018
|
|
|
For
the Nine Months Ended
Sept 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
As
Reported
|
|
|
Balances
Without
Adoption of
ASC 606
|
|
|
Effect
of
Change
Higher/
(Lower)
|
|
|
As
Reported
|
|
|
Balances
Without
Adoption of
ASC 606
|
|
|
Effect
of
Change
Higher/
(Lower)
|
|
Income Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
3,324,621
|
|
|
$
|
3,342,533
|
|
|
$
|
(17,912
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,387,094
|
|
|
$
|
7,404,506
|
|
|
$
|
(17,412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(643,562
|
)
|
|
$
|
(625,650
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,912
|
|
|
$
|
(3,928,051
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,910,639
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Revenue
|
|
$
|
555,417
|
|
|
$
|
594,917
|
|
|
$
|
(39,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
555,417
|
|
|
$
|
594,917
|
|
|
$
|
(39,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
$
|
(23,531,018
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,570,518
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,531,018
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,570,518
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39,500
|
)
|
Revenue
Recognition Accounting Policy Summary
The
Company accounts for revenue in accordance with the new revenue standard. Under the new revenue standard, a performance obligation
is a promise in a contract with a customer to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer. Most of the Company’s
contracts contain multiple performance obligations that include engineering and technical services as well as the delivery of
a diverse range of climate control system equipment and components, which can span multiple phases of a customer’s project
life-cycle from facility design and construction to equipment delivery and system installation and start-up. The Company does
not provide construction services or system installation services. Some of the Company’s contracts with customers contain
a single performance obligation, typically engineering only services contracts. A contract’s transaction price is allocated
to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. When there
are multiple performance obligations within a contract, the Company allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation
based on its standalone selling price.
Generally,
satisfaction occurs when control of the promised goods are transferred to the customer or as services are rendered or completed
in exchange for consideration in an amount for which the Company expects to be entitled. The Company recognizes revenue for the
sale of goods when control transfers to the customer, which primarily occurs at the time of shipment. The Company’s historical
rates of return are insignificant as a percentage of sales and, as a result, the Company does not record a reserve for returns
at the time the Company recognizes revenue. The Company also recognizes revenue net of sales taxes. The revenue and cost for freight
and shipping is recorded when control over the sale of goods passes to the Company’s customers.
The
Company also has performance obligations to perform certain engineering services that are satisfied over a period of time. Performance
obligations are satisfied over-time if the customer receives the benefits as the Company performs work, if the customer controls
the asset as it is being produced, or if the product being produced for the customer has no alternative use and the Company has
a contractual right to payment. Revenue is recognized from this type of performance obligation as services are rendered based
on the percentage completion towards certain specified milestones.
The
Company offers assurance-type warranties for its products and products manufactured by others to meet specifications defined by
the contracts with customers and does not have any material separate performance obligations related to these warranties. The
Company maintains a warranty reserve based on historical warranty costs.
Other
Judgments and Assumptions
The
Company applies the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-50-14 and does not disclose information about remaining performance obligations
that have original expected durations of one year or less. Applying the practical expedient in ASC 340-40-25-4, the Company recognizes
the incremental costs of obtaining contracts as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the assets that the Company
otherwise would have recognized is one year or less. These costs include certain sales commissions and incentives and are included
in selling, general and administrative expenses. ASC 606-10-32-18 allows the Company to not adjust the amount of consideration
to be received in a contract for any significant financing component if the Company expects to receive payment within twelve months
of transfer of control of goods or services. The Company has elected this expedient as it expects all consideration to be received
in one year or less at contract inception. The Company has also elected not to provide the remaining performance obligations disclosures
related to service contracts in accordance with the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-55-18. The Company recognizes revenue in
the amount to which the entity has a right to invoice and has adopted this election to not provide the remaining performance obligations
related to service contracts.
Contract
Assets and Contract Liabilities
Contract
assets reflect revenue recognized and performance obligations satisfied in advance of customer billing. Contract liabilities relate
to payments received in advance of the satisfaction of performance under the contract. The Company receives payments from customers
based on the terms established in its contracts.
Contract
assets include unbilled amounts where revenue recognized exceeds the amount billed to the customer and the right of payment is
conditional, subject to completing a milestone, such as a phase of a project. The Company typically does not have material amounts
of contract assets since revenue is recognized as control of goods are transferred or as services are performed. As of September
30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had no contract assets.
Contract
liabilities consist of advance payments in excess of revenue recognized. The Company’s contract liabilities are recorded
as a current liability in Deferred Revenue in the condensed consolidated balance sheet since the timing of when the Company expects
to recognize revenue is generally less than one year. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the deferred revenue, which
was classified as a current liability, was $555,417 and $1,011,871, respectively.
Accounting
for Share-Based Compensation
The
Company recognizes the cost resulting from all share-based compensation arrangements, including stock options, restricted stock
awards and restricted stock units that the Company grants under its equity incentive plan in its condensed consolidated financial
statements based on their grant date fair value. The expense is recognized over the requisite service period or performance period
of the award. Awards with a graded vesting period based on service are expensed on a straight-line basis for the entire award.
Awards with performance-based vesting conditions, which require the achievement of a specific company financial performance goal
at the end of the performance period and required service period, are recognized over the performance period. Each reporting
period, the Company reassesses the probability of achieving the respective performance goal. If the goals are not expected to
be met, no compensation cost is recognized and any previously recognized amount recorded is reversed. If the award contains market-based
vesting conditions, the compensation cost is based on the grant date fair value and expected achievement of market condition and
is not subsequently reversed if it is later determined that the condition is not likely to be met or is expected to be lower than
initially expected.
The
grant date fair value of stock options is based on the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model (the “Black-Scholes Model”).
The Black-Scholes Model requires judgmental assumptions including volatility and expected term, both based on historical experience.
The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury interest rates whose term is consistent with the expected term of the option.
The
grant date fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units is based on the closing price of the underlying stock on
the date of the grant.
The
Company has elected to reduce share-based compensation expense for forfeitures as the forfeitures occur since the Company does
not have historical data or other factors to appropriately estimate the expected employee terminations and to evaluate whether
particular groups of employees have significantly different forfeiture expectations.
Share-based
awards granted to non-employees are recorded at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity issued,
whichever can be more readily measured, on the measurement date and are subject to periodic adjustment as the underlying share-based
awards vest.
Share-based
compensation paid to employees, directors and non-employees totaled $573,931 and $878,964 for the three months ended September
30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $2,067,191 and $1,270,933 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Share-based
compensation expenses are classified in the condensed consolidated financial statements in the same manner as if such compensation
was paid in cash. The following is a summary of share-based compensation costs included in the condensed consolidated statements
of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively:
|
|
For
the Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Share-based compensation expense included
in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
20,311
|
|
|
$
|
38,104
|
|
|
$
|
99,374
|
|
|
$
|
38,104
|
|
Advertising and marketing expenses
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
7,259
|
|
|
|
5,398
|
|
|
|
7,259
|
|
Product development costs
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
|
|
2,640
|
|
|
|
3,411
|
|
|
|
2,640
|
|
Selling, general
and administrative expenses
|
|
|
550,210
|
|
|
|
830,961
|
|
|
|
1,959,008
|
|
|
|
1,222,930
|
|
Total share-based
compensation expense included in consolidated statement of operations
|
|
$
|
573,931
|
|
|
$
|
878,964
|
|
|
$
|
2,067,191
|
|
|
$
|
1,270,933
|
|
Basic
and Diluted Net Loss per Common Share
Basic
net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during
the period. Diluted net loss per common share is determined using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during
the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. In periods when losses are reported, the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents, because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Commitments
and Contingencies
In
the normal course of business, the Company is subject to loss contingencies, such as legal proceedings and claims arising out
of its business, that cover a wide range of matters, including, among others, customer disputes, government investigations and
tax matters. An accrual for a loss contingency is recognized when it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability
had been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.
Other
Risks and Uncertainties
To
achieve profitable operations, the Company must successfully develop, manufacture and market its products. There can be no assurance
that any such products can be developed or manufactured at an acceptable cost and with appropriate performance characteristics,
or that such products will be successfully marketed. These factors could have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s
financial results, financial position, and future cash flows.
The
Company is subject to risks common to similarly-situated companies including, but not limited to, new technological innovations,
dependence on key personnel, protection of proprietary technology, compliance with government regulations, uncertainty of market
acceptance of products, product liability, and the need to obtain financing for operations and capital requirements. As a supplier
of services and equipment to cannabis cultivators, the Company is also subject to risks related to the cannabis industry. Although
certain states and Canada, where the Company sells its products, have legalized medical and/or recreational cannabis, U.S. federal
laws continue to prohibit cannabis in all its forms as well as its derivatives. The enforcement of U.S. federal laws may adversely
affect the implementation of state and local cannabis laws and regulations that permit medical or recreational cannabis and, correspondingly,
may adversely impact the Company’s customers and the Company. The Company’s success is also dependent upon its ability
to raise additional capital and to successfully develop and market its products.
Segment
Information
Operating
segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated
regularly by the Company’s senior management team in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The
Company has one operating segment that is dedicated to the manufacture and sale of its products.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
February 2016, the FASB adopted ASU 2016-02,
Leases
(Topic 842) which requires companies leasing assets to recognize on
their balance sheet a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to
use the underlying asset for the lease term on contracts longer than one year. The lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy
election to not recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases. How leases are recorded on the balance sheet
represents a significant change from previous GAAP guidance in Topic 840. ASU 2016-02 maintains a distinction between finance
leases and operating leases similar to the distinction under previous lease guidance for capital leases and operating leases.
In July 2018, FASB issued ASU 2018-10,
Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases
. This amendment provides improvements
that clarify specific aspects of the guidance in ASU 2016-02. In July 2018, FASB also issued ASU 2018-11,
Targeted Improvements
to Topic 842, Leases
. This amendment provides entities with an additional (and optional) transition method to adopt the new
leases standard. Under this new transition method, an entity initially applies the new leases standard at the adoption date and
recognizes a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. Consequently,
an entity’s reporting for the comparative periods presented in the financial statements in which it adopts the new leases
standard will continue to be in accordance with current GAAP (Topic 840, Leases). ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal periods
beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The Company expects that this new standard will have a material
effect on our financial statements. While we continue to assess all of the effects of adoption, we currently believe the most
significant effect to be related to the recognition of new ROU assets and lease liabilities on our balance sheet for our office
and equipment operating leases.
In
June 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) adopted ASU 2018-07, “Compensation — Stock
Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which expands the scope of Topic
718 to include all share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. ASU 2018-07 specifies
that Topic 718 applies to all share-based payment transactions in which the grantor acquires goods and services to be used or
consumed in its own operations by issuing share-based payment awards. ASU 2018-07 also clarifies that Topic 718 does not apply
to share-based payments used to effectively provide (1) financing to the issuer, or (2) awards granted in conjunction with selling
goods or services to customers as part of a contract accounted for under ASC 606. ASU 2018-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted, but no earlier than
the Company’s adoption of ASC 606. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that adopting this new accounting guidance
will have on its consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
In
August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) - Disclosure Framework - Changes to the disclosure
requirements for fair value measurement, which modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820. The
amendment will be effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted. The Company
is currently assessing the impact of the ASU on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other
accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected
to have a material impact on the financial statements upon adoption. The Company does not discuss recent pronouncements that are
not anticipated to have an impact on or are unrelated to its financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
Note
3 – Inventory
Inventory
consisted of the following:
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
536,512
|
|
|
$
|
569,047
|
|
Work in progress
|
|
|
10,159
|
|
|
|
14,348
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
282,837
|
|
|
|
262,611
|
|
Allowance for
excess & obsolete inventory
|
|
|
(328,310
|
)
|
|
|
(323,384
|
)
|
Inventory, net
|
|
$
|
501,198
|
|
|
$
|
522,622
|
|
Overhead
expenses of $34,081 and $28,554 were included in the inventory balance as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
Note
4 – Property and Equipment
Property
and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
$
|
352,434
|
|
|
$
|
326,894
|
|
Equipment held for lease to related
party
|
|
|
176,042
|
|
|
|
159,806
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
215,193
|
|
|
|
33,257
|
|
|
|
|
758,669
|
|
|
|
534,957
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(228,514
|
)
|
|
|
(133,601
|
)
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
530,155
|
|
|
$
|
401,356
|
|
Note
5 – Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities consisted of the following:
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
1,561,706
|
|
|
$
|
1,159,975
|
|
Sales
commissions payable
|
|
|
96,525
|
|
|
|
21,931
|
|
Accrued
payroll liabilities
|
|
|
146,773
|
|
|
|
58,557
|
|
Product
warranty accrual
|
|
|
130,042
|
|
|
|
105,122
|
|
Commercial
dispute settlement
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
332,418
|
|
Other
accrued expenses
|
|
|
178,670
|
|
|
|
291,260
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,113,716
|
|
|
$
|
1,969,263
|
|
Note
6 – Related Party Agreements and Transactions
Sterling
Pharms Equipment Agreement
On
May 10, 2017, the Board approved a three-year equipment, demonstration and product testing agreement between the Company and Sterling
Pharms, LLC (“Sterling”), an entity controlled by Mr. Keen, a principal shareholder of the Company, which operates
a Colorado-regulated cannabis cultivation facility. Under this agreement, the Company agreed to provide to Sterling certain lighting,
environmental control, and air sanitation equipment for use at the Sterling facility in exchange for a quarterly fee of $16,500
from Sterling. Also, under this agreement, Sterling agreed to allow the Company and its existing and prospective customers to
have access to the Sterling facility for demonstration tours in a working environment, which the Company believes will assist
it in the sale of its products. Sterling also agreed to monitor, test and evaluate the Company’s products installed at the
Sterling facility and to collect data and provide feedback to the Company on the energy and operational efficiency and efficacy
of the installed products, which the Company intends to use to improve, enhance and develop new or additional product features,
innovations and technologies. In consideration for access to the Sterling facility to conduct demonstration tours and for the
product testing and data to be provided by Sterling, the Company will pay Sterling a quarterly fee of $12,000.
On
March 22, 2018, the Company and Sterling entered into an amendment of the original agreement to include additional leased equipment
and to increase the quarterly fee payable to the Company to $18,330. The amendment of the original agreement also provided that,
upon expiration of the initial three-year term, either: (i) the leased equipment would be returned to the Company and the agreement
would terminate, (ii) Sterling could purchase the leased equipment at the agreed upon residual value of $81,827, or (iii) Sterling
and the Company could agree to an extension of the original agreement at mutually agreed to quarterly payments to and from the
parties.
After
giving effect to the amended quarterly equipment lease fees received from Sterling of $18,330 (the “Lease Fee”) and
the quarterly demonstration and testing fees paid to Sterling of $12,000 (the “Demo and Testing Fee”), the Company
will receive a net payment of $6,330 from Sterling each quarter.
Sterling
accepted delivery of the remaining leased equipment and completed installation of the equipment at its facility on May 1, 2018.
Accordingly, the term of this agreement, which commenced upon complete installation of the equipment, commenced May 1, 2018 and
will expire April 30, 2021.
The
Company is treating the equipment rental arrangement and related Lease Fee payment as an operating lease. Accordingly, the equipment
held for lease has been recorded as property and equipment on the balance sheets and will be depreciated over the term of the
lease. The Lease Fee will be recorded as “Interest and other income, net” in the condensed consolidated statements
of operations. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company recorded Lease Fees of $18,330 and $30,550,
respectively.
The
Company will record the Demo and Testing Fee as operating expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. For
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company recorded Demo and Testing Fees of $12,000 and $20,000, respectively.
Company
Purchase of Common Stock from Stephen and Brandy Keen
On
May 29, 2018, the Company and the Keens entered into a Stock Repurchase Agreement (the “Stock Repurchase Agreement”),
pursuant to which the Company agreed to repurchase from the Keens shares of the Company’s common stock at the Repurchase
Price per Share (as defined below) for a total repurchase price of $400,000 (“Repurchased Shares”). The Company’s
obligation to repurchase the Repurchased Shares was contingent on the closing of a private placement offering to accredited investors
of the Company’s common stock, which occurred during the second quarter of 2018. The Repurchase Price per Share was $0.128,
which was equal to 80% of the $0.16 unit price paid by investors in the private placement offering to reflect the estimated value
of the warrant included in the unit. On June 19, 2018, the Company closed the transaction under the Stock Repurchase Agreement
and repurchased 3,125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock from the Keens.
Company
Option to Purchase of Preferred Stock from Stephen and Brandy Keen
On
May 29, 2018, the Company and the Keens entered into a Preferred Stock Option Agreement under which the Company has the right,
but not the obligation, to acquire all 35,189,669 shares of preferred stock owned by the Keens (the “Preferred Stock”).
Pursuant to the Preferred Stock Option Agreement, upon exercise of the option by the Company, the Company will issue one share
of common stock for each 1,000 shares of preferred stock purchased by the Company. The common stock issued upon exercise will
be restricted shares. The option will expire on April 30, 2020. As consideration for the Keens’ grant of the option, the
Company paid them $5,000. As of September 30, 2018, the Company has not exercised this option. See Note 9 and Note 12.
Note
7 – Derivative Liabilities
The
Company determined that certain warrants issued in 2015 qualified as derivative financial instruments. Accordingly, the warrants
were recorded as derivative liabilities and were marked to market at the end of each reporting period. Any change in fair value
during the period was recorded as gain (loss) on change in derivative liabilities in the condensed consolidated statements of
operations.
During
the first quarter of 2018, all of the outstanding warrants were exercised on a cashless basis and the Company extinguished the
derivative liability of approximately $389,000 and recorded an increase in additional paid-in capital of the same amount. The
gain on change in derivative liabilities presented in the statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2018 of $0 and $21,403, respectively, represent the gain on derivatives through the date of the cashless exercise of the warrants.
The
following table sets forth movement in the derivative liability related to the warrants:
Balance December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
410,880
|
|
Gain on change
in derivative liability, net
|
|
|
(21,403
|
)
|
Balance prior to exercise of associated
warrants
|
|
|
389,477
|
|
Extinguishment
of derivative liability on cashless exercise of associated warrants
|
|
|
(389,477
|
)
|
Balance September 30, 2018
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Note
8 – Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
From
time to time, in the normal course of its operations, the Company is subject to litigation matters and claims. Litigation can
be expensive and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to
predict and the Company’s view of these matters may change in the future as the litigation and events related thereto unfold.
The Company expenses legal fees as incurred. The Company records a liability for contingent losses when it is both probable that
a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. An unfavorable outcome to any legal matter,
if material, could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations or its financial position, liquidity or results of
operations.
Internal
Revenue Service Penalties
The
Company was penalized by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for failure to file its Foreign Form 5471, Information
Return of U.S. Persons with Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations, for the years 2011, 2012 and 2014 on a timely basis. In September
2018, the IRS notified the Company that it granted an abatement of the full amount of the assessed penalties and interest. No
prior accrual was recorded as management determined the abatement was more likely than not.
Building
Lease
The
Company has a lease agreement for its manufacturing and office space consisting of approximately 18,600 square feet, which commenced
on September 29, 2017 and continues through August 31, 2022. The monthly rental rate was $18,979 until August 31, 2018. Beginning
September 1, 2018, the monthly rent increased by 3% and will continue to increase by 3% each year through the end of the lease.
The current monthly rental rate is $19,548. The Company made a security deposit of $51,000 and received a $100,000 tenant allowance
for leasehold improvements.
The
following is a schedule by years of the minimum future lease payments on the building lease as of September 30, 2018.
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
58,645
|
|
2019
|
|
|
236,926
|
|
2020
|
|
|
244,034
|
|
2021
|
|
|
251,355
|
|
2022
|
|
|
170,888
|
|
Total
future minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
961,848
|
|
Total
rent under the building lease is charged to expense over the term of the lease on a straight-line basis, resulting in the same
monthly rent expense throughout the lease. The difference between the rent expense amount and the actual rent paid is recorded
to deferred rent on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The
Company recorded to deferred rent a credit for the tenant improvements paid for or reimbursed by the landlord during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2018. Depreciation of the leasehold improvements and amortization of the credit have been
determined based on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the lease. The amortization of the credit for the tenant
improvement allowance will result in a corresponding reduction in rent expense over the term of the lease.
Other
Commitments
In
the ordinary course of business, the Company may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors,
business partners, and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of the
Company’s breach of such agreements, services to be provided by the Company, or from intellectual property infringement
claims made by third parties. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and certain
of its officers and employees that will require the Company to, among other things, indemnify them against certain liabilities
that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors, officers, or employees. The Company maintains director and officer
insurance, which may cover certain liabilities arising from its obligation to indemnify its directors and certain of its officers
and employees, and former officers, directors, and employees of acquired companies, in certain circumstances.
Note
9 – Non-compensatory Equity Transactions
Private
Placement Offering
During
the second quarter of 2018, the Company completed a private placement offering of investment units (the “Units”),
at a price of $0.16 per Unit, with certain accredited investors. Each Unit consisted of one share of the Company’s common
stock and one warrant for the purchase of one share of the Company’s common stock. The Company issued a total of 7,562,500
Units for aggregate proceeds of $1,210,000. No commissions or fees were paid in connection with the offering. The proceeds are
being used for working capital and general corporate purposes, after $400,000 from the proceeds was used to repurchase shares
of common stock from the Keens.
The
warrants have an exercise price of $0.25 per share of the common stock underlying each warrant, subject to adjustment as provided
in the warrant. The warrants are exercisable commencing July 1, 2018 until June 30, 2021. The warrant may be exercised only for
cash.
Each
warrant is callable at the Company’s option, beginning on July 1, 2019 until the expiration date of the warrant, provided
the closing price of the Company’s common stock is $0.40 (subject to adjustment as provided in the warrant) or greater for
five consecutive trading days (the “Call Condition”). Commencing at any time after the date on which the Call Condition
is satisfied, the Company has the right, upon notice to the holders, to redeem the shares of common stock underlying each warrant
at a price of $0.01 per share, but such redemption may not occur earlier than sixty-one (61) days following the date of the receipt
of notice by the holder (the “Redemption Date”). The holder may exercise the warrant (in whole or in part) prior to
the Redemption Date at the Exercise Price.
Other
Equity Issuances
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company issued shares of its restricted common stock as follows:
|
●
|
100,000
shares upon the exercise of certain warrants by an investor and payment of the exercise
price of $15,000;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
1,498,325
shares upon the exercise of certain warrants by a former director on a cashless exercise
basis;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
1,168,540
shares upon exercise of certain warrants by investors on a cashless exercise basis;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
800,000
shares in connection with the settlement of a commercial dispute;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
273,675
shares to consultants as compensation for services rendered;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
31,562
shares to certain employees under a sales incentive plan;
|
Purchase
of Preferred Stock Option
On
May 29, 2018, the Company acquired an option to purchase 35,189,669 shares of preferred stock owned by the Keens. The Company
paid the Keens $5,000 for this option. See Note 6. The Company recorded the purchase price for the option as an increase to accumulated
deficit. See Note 12.
Note
10 – Equity Incentive Plan
On
August 1, 2017, the Board adopted and approved the 2017 Equity Plan in order to attract, motivate, retain, and reward high-quality
executives and other employees, officers, directors, consultants, and other persons who provide services to the Company by enabling
such persons to acquire an equity interest in the Company. Under the 2017 Equity Plan, the Board (or the compensation committee
of the Board, if one is established) may award stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock
awards (“RSAs”), restricted stock unit awards (“RSUs”), shares granted as a bonus or in lieu of another
award, and other stock-based performance awards. The 2017 Equity Plan allocates 50,000,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock (“Plan Shares”) for issuance of equity awards under the 2017 Equity Plan. If any shares subject to an award
are forfeited, expire, or otherwise terminate without issuance of such shares, the shares will, to the extent of such forfeiture,
expiration, or termination, again be available for awards under the 2017 Equity Plan.
As
of September 30, 2018, the Company has granted, under the 2017 Equity Plan, awards in the form of RSAs for services rendered by
independent directors and consultants, non-qualified stock options, RSUs and stock bonus awards totaling 41,069,342 shares. Of
these total awards, as of September 30, 2018, (i) awards related to 5,411,666 shares have been forfeited or expired, (ii) 11,896,974
shares have been issued on settlement of vested awards, and (iii) awards related to 23,760,702 remain outstanding.
On
July 9, 2018, the Board appointed a new Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Treasurer. In connection with this appointment,
the Company and the new CFO entered into an employment agreement that will continue until June 30, 2020. Under the employment
agreement, the new CFO is eligible to receive an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, as determined
by the Board in its sole discretion, as follows: (i) for the six-month period ended December 31, 2018, the new CFO will be eligible
to receive a special bonus of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, provided the Board has determined that his
performance has been average or better for such period, and (ii) for each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2019, December
31, 2019 and June 30, 2020, the new CFO will be eligible to receive a special bonus of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock, provided the Board has determined that he has achieved certain benchmarks and milestones as mutually agreed to by
him and the Board in advance of each such period.
On
July 13, 2018, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares to Brandy Keen in settlement of RSUs that vested on June 30, 2018.
On
August 2, 2018, the Board approved the following:
|
●
|
The
issuance of 105,634 shares of common stock to independent directors in lieu of cash director
fees of $15,000 related to the second quarter of 2018;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
issuance of 560,000 shares pursuant to a special incentive stock bonus earned by an employee
for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, subject to the remittance of required withholding
taxes by the recipient; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
grant to a new employee of 120,000 RSUs that vest on the six-month anniversary of employment.
|
On
September 12, 2018, the Board approved the following:
|
●
|
The
grant to an independent director in lieu of cash director fees of $30,000 of 394,736
RSU’s of which 197,368 vested on his appointment and were settled by issuance of
197,368 shares in September 2018 and 197,368 of which will vest on completion of one
year of service; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
September 2018, the issuance of 300,000 shares pursuant to incentive stock bonuses earned
by employees upon completion of their first year of employment.
|
The
total unrecognized compensation expense for unvested non-qualified stock options, RSUs and stock bonus awards at September 30,
2018 was $1,294,958, which will be recognized over approximately 2.0 years. This unrecognized compensation expense does not include
the potential future compensation expense related to non-qualified stock options and RSUs which are subject to vesting based on
the achievement of $18,000,000 in revenue for 2018 and $25,000,000 in revenue for 2019 (the “Performance-based Awards”).
As of September 30, 2018 and the grant date, the Company has determined that the likelihood of performance levels being obtained
is remote; therefore, no expense was recognized. The unrecognized compensation expense with respect to these Performance-based
Awards at September 30, 2018 was $995,154.
Non-Qualified
Stock Options
The
Company uses the Black-Scholes Model to determine the fair value of options granted. Option-pricing models require the input of
highly subjective assumptions, particularly for the expected stock price volatility and the expected term of options. Changes
in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. The expected stock price volatility assumptions
are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over periods that are similar to the expected terms
of grants and other relevant factors. The Company derives the expected term based on an average of the contract term and the vesting
period taking into consideration the vesting schedules and future employee behavior with regard to option exercise. The risk-free
interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury yields for a maturity approximating the expected term calculated at the date of grant.
The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock and the Company has no intention to pay a dividend at this time;
therefore, the Company assumes that no dividends will be paid over the expected terms of option awards.
The
Company determines the assumptions used in the valuation of option awards as of the date of grant. Differences in the expected
stock price volatility, expected term or risk-free interest rate may necessitate distinct valuation assumptions at those grant
dates. As such, the Company may use different assumptions for options granted throughout the year. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2018, the valuation assumptions used to determine the fair value of each option award on the date of grant were:
expected stock price volatility 118.90%; expected term in years 7.5 and risk-free interest rate 2.77%.
A
summary of the non-qualified stock options granted to employees under the 2017 Equity Plan as of September 30, 2018, and changes
during the nine months then ended, are presented in the table below:
|
|
Number
of
Options
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
10,235,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.121
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,218,375
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2,183,332
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(33,334
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
as of September 30, 2018
|
|
|
8,993,334
|
|
|
$
|
0.121
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
$
|
210,640
|
|
Exercisable
as of September 30, 2018
|
|
|
1,826,674
|
|
|
$
|
0.124
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
36,390
|
|
Oustanding
vested and expected to vest as of September 30, 2018
|
|
|
2,693,334
|
|
|
$
|
0.126
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
47,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
options based on 2018 and 2019 revenue thresholds - uncertain vesting as of September 30, 2018
|
|
|
6,300,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.118
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
$
|
162,950
|
|
A
summary of non-vested non-qualified stock options granted to employees
under the
2017 Equity
Plan
as of September 30, 2018, and any changes during the nine months then ended, are presented in
the table below: