NMRK Newmark Group Inc

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

Newmark Group, Inc., formerly known as Newmark Knight Frank (together with its subsidiaries, “Newmark” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, was formed as NRE Delaware, Inc. on November 18, 2016. Newmark changed its name to Newmark Group, Inc. on October 18, 2017. Newmark Holdings, L.P. (“Newmark Holdings”) is a consolidated subsidiary of Newmark for which Newmark is the general partner. Newmark and Newmark Holdings jointly own Newmark Partners, L.P. (“Newmark OpCo”), the operating partnership. Newmark is a leading commercial real estate services firm. Newmark offers commercial real estate tenants, owner-occupiers, investors and developers a wide range of services, including leasing and corporate advisory, investment sales and real estate finance, consulting, origination and servicing of commercial mortgage loans, valuation, project and development management and property and facility management.

Newmark was formed through BGC Partners, Inc.’s (“BGC Partners” or “BGC”) purchase of Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc. and certain of its affiliates in 2011. A majority of the voting power of BGC Partners is held by Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. and its affiliates (together, “Cantor”), including Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. which we refer to as “CF&Co.”

On September 8, 2017, BGC acquired, from Cantor Commercial Real Estate Company, LP (“CCRE”), 100% of the equity of Berkeley Point Financial LLC (“Berkeley Point Acquisition”). Berkeley Point Financial LLC (“Berkeley Point” or “BPF”) is a leading commercial real estate finance company focused on the origination and sale of multifamily and other commercial real estate loans through government-sponsored and government-funded loan programs, as well as the servicing of commercial real estate loans. At the closing of the Berkeley Point Acquisition, BGC purchased and acquired from CCRE all of the outstanding membership interests of BPF, a wholly owned subsidiary of CCRE, for an acquisition price of $875.0 million, subject to a post-closing upward or downward adjustment to the extent that the net assets, inclusive of certain fair value adjustments, of BPF as of the closing were greater than or less than $508.6 million. BGC paid $3.2 million of the $875.0 million acquisition price with 247,099 limited partnership units of BGC Holdings, L.P. (“BGC Holdings”), which may be exchanged over time for shares of Class A common stock of BGC, with each BGC Holdings unit valued for these purposes at the volume weighted-average price of a share of BGC Class A common stock for the three trading days prior to the closing. The Berkeley Point Acquisition did not include the Special Asset Servicing Group of BPF; however, BPF will continue to hold the Special Asset Servicing Group’s assets until the servicing group is transferred to CCRE at a later date in a separate transaction. Accordingly, CCRE will continue to bear the benefits and burdens of the Special Asset Servicing Group from and after the closing.

Concurrently with the Berkeley Point Acquisition, on September 8, 2017 Newmark invested $100.0 million in a newly formed commercial real estate-related financial and investment business, CF Real Estate Finance Holdings, L.P. (“Real Estate LP”), which is controlled and managed by Cantor. Real Estate LP may conduct activities in any real estate related business or asset backed securities-related business or any extensions thereof and ancillary activities thereto. In addition, Real Estate LP may provide short-term loans to related parties from time to time when funds in excess of amounts needed for investment are available. As of September 30, 2018, Newmark’s investment in Real Estate LP is accounted for under the equity method.

On December 13, 2017, prior to the closing of Newmark’s initial public offering (“IPO”), BGC, BGC Holdings, BGC Partners, L.P. (“BGC U.S. OpCo”), Newmark, Newmark Holdings, Newmark OpCo and, solely for the provisions listed therein, Cantor and BGC Global Holdings, L.P. (“BGC Global OpCo”) entered into a Separation and Distribution Agreement (the “Separation and Distribution Agreement”). The Separation and Distribution Agreement sets forth the agreements among BGC, Cantor, Newmark and their respective subsidiaries regarding, among other things:

11

On December 15, 2017, Newmark announced the pricing of the IPO of 20 million shares of Newmark’s Class A common stock at a price to the public of $14.00 per share, which was completed on December 19, 2017. Newmark Class A shares began trading on December 15, 2017 on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “NMRK.” In addition, Newmark granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 3 million shares of Newmark Class A common stock at the IPO price, less underwriting discounts and commissions. On December 26, 2017, the underwriters of the IPO exercised in full their overallotment option to purchase an additional 3 million shares of Newmark Class A common stock from Newmark at the IPO price, less underwriting discounts and commission (the “option”). As a result, Newmark received aggregate net proceeds of approximately $295.4 million from the IPO, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses. Upon the closing of the option, Newmark’s public stockholders owned approximately 16.6% of the shares of Newmark Class A common stock. This is based on 138.6 million shares of Newmark Class A common stock outstanding following the closing of the option. Also upon the closing of the option, Newmark’s public stockholders owned approximately 9.8% of what was then Newmark’s 234.2 million fully diluted shares outstanding.

As part of the Separation described above, BGC contributed its interests in both BPF and Real Estate LP to Newmark.

On March 7, 2018, BGC Partners and its operating subsidiaries purchased 16.6 million newly issued exchangeable limited partnership units (the “Newmark Units”) of Newmark Holdings L.P. for approximately $242.0 million (the “Investment in Newmark”). These newly-issued Newmark Units are exchangeable, at BGC’s discretion, into either shares of Class A common stock or shares of Class B common stock of Newmark. BGC and its subsidiaries funded the Investment in Newmark using proceeds of its Controlled Equity Offering sales program. See Note 25— Related Party Transactions for additional information.

On November 13, 2018, BGC announced that its Board of Directors approved the distribution, or spin-off, to its common stockholders of all the Class A shares and Class B shares of Newmark common stock that it then owns in a manner intended to qualify as generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Newmark is in the process of completing the necessary steps to achieve the spin-off by November 30, 2018 (the “Distribution Date”), and as part of these steps, Newmark has obtained its own credit rating. In addition, in order for the spin-off to be tax free, Newmark must repay or refinance any debt owed to or guaranteed by BGC.  As of September 30, 2018, Newmark had $434.0 million of debt owed to or guaranteed by BGC and $382.5 million of borrowings outstanding under the Intercompany Credit Agreement. As of September 30, 2018, Newmark had $260.6 million pledged for the benefit of Fannie Mae in excess of the minimum required balance. On October 4, 2018, Newmark withdrew $252.0 million of the cash pledged for the benefit of Fannie Mae, and repaid BGC $252.0 million of the outstanding borrowings under the Intercompany Credit Agreement. On November 6, 2018, Newmark repaid the remaining $134.0 million outstanding principal amount of the Converted Term Loan and the $112.5 million promissory note under the Intercompany Credit Agreement using proceeds from the sale of its 6.125% Senior Notes. On November 7, 2018, Newmark repaid the then remaining outstanding balance under the Intercompany Credit Agreement. Newmark will repay the $300.0 million outstanding principal amount under the 2019 Promissory Note prior to November 30, 2018, using primarily proceeds from the sale of its 6.125% Senior Notes. Upon repayment of the 2019 Promissory Note, Newmark will have no further debt obligations owed to BGC. See Note 30 - Subsequent Events.

On November 22, 2017, BGC and Newmark entered into an amendment to an unsecured senior term loan credit agreement, dated as of September 8, 2017, with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and a syndicate of lenders. The agreement provides for a term loan of up to $575.0 million (the “Term Loan”), and as of the Separation this entire amount remained outstanding under the term loan credit agreement. Pursuant to the term loan amendment and effective as of the Separation, Newmark assumed the obligations of BGC as borrower under the Term Loan. Newmark used the proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and commissions from the IPO to partially repay $304.3 million of the Term Loan. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, Newmark repaid the outstanding balance of $270.7 million on the Term Loan.

12

Also on November 22, 2017, BGC and Newmark entered into an amendment to the unsecured senior revolving credit agreement, dated as of September 8, 2017, with the administrative agent and a syndicate of lenders. The re volving credit agreement provides for revolving loans of up to $400.0 million. As of the Separation, $400.0 million of borrowings were outstanding under the revolving credit facility. Pursuant to the revolver amendment, the then-outstanding borrowings of B GC under the revolving credit facility were converted into a term loan (the “Converted Term Loan”) and, effective upon the Separation, Newmark assumed the obligations of BGC as borrower under the Converted Term Loan. During the nine months ended September  30, 2018, Newmark repaid $ 266.1 million of the Converted Term Loan. As of September 30, 2018, the balance of the Converted Term Loan was $134.0 million.

On June 26, 2012, BGC issued an aggregate of $112.5 million principal amount of its 8.125% Senior Notes due 2042 (the “8.125% BGC Senior Notes”). In connection with the issuance of the 8.125% BGC Senior Notes, BGC lent the proceeds of the 8.125% BGC Senior Notes to BGC U.S. OpCo, and BGC U.S. OpCo issued an amended and restated promissory note, effective as of June 26, 2012, with an aggregate principal amount of $112.5 million payable to BGC (the “2042 Promissory Note”). In connection with the Separation, on December 13, 2017 Newmark OpCo assumed all of BGC U.S. OpCo’s rights and obligations under the 2042 Promissory Note. On September 4, 2018, BGC U.S. OpCo loaned to Newmark OpCo $112.5 million pursuant to the Intercompany Credit Agreement, which bears an annual interest rate of 6.5%. Newmark OpCo used the proceeds to repay the 2042 Promissory Note assumed by it in connection with the Separation.  In addition, on September 5, 2018, BGC redeemed the outstanding $112.5 million aggregate principal amount of the 8.125% BGC Senior Notes. On November 6, 2018, Newmark repaid the $112.5 million promissory note under the Intercompany Credit Agreement using proceeds from the sale of its 6.125% Senior Notes. See Note 30 - Subsequent Events for additional information.  

On December 9, 2014, BGC issued an aggregate of $300.0 million principal amount of its 5.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “5.375% BGC Senior Notes”). In connection with the issuance of the 5.375% BGC Senior Notes, BGC lent the proceeds of the 5.375% BGC Senior Notes to BGC U.S. OpCo, and BGC U.S. OpCo issued an amended and restated promissory note, effective as of December 9, 2014, with an aggregate principal amount of $300.0 million payable to BGC (the “2019 Promissory Note” and, together with the 2042 Promissory Note, the “BGC Notes”). In connection with the Separation, on December 13, 2017 Newmark OpCo assumed all of BGC U.S. OpCo’s rights and obligations under the 2019 Promissory Note. Newmark will repay the $300.0 million outstanding principal amount under the 2019 Promissory Note prior to November 30, 2018, using primarily proceeds from the sale of its 6.125% Senior Notes. See Note 30 - Subsequent Events.

On March 19, 2018, Newmark entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “Intercompany Credit Agreement”) with BGC, which amended and restated the original intercompany credit agreement between the parties in relation to the Separation, dated as of December 13, 2017. The Intercompany Credit Agreement provides for each party to issue revolving loans to the other party in the lender’s discretion. The interest rate on the Intercompany Credit Agreement can be the higher of BGC’s or Newmark’s short-term borrowings rate in effect at such time plus 100 basis points, or such other interest rate as may be mutually agreed between BGC and Newmark. The interest rate as of September 30, 2018 was 5.41%. As of September 30, 2018, Newmark’s borrowings under the Intercompany Credit Agreement included $270.0 million which bore an interest rate of 5.41% and $112.5 million which bore an interest rate 6.5%. Newmark recorded interest expense of $4.2 million and $7.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, which is included in “Interest (expense) income, net” in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations. As of November 7, 2018, all borrowings outstanding under the Intercompany Credit Agreement had been repaid. See Note 30 - Subsequent Events.

Exchangeable Preferred Partnership Units and Forward Contract

On June 18, 2018 and September 26, 2018, Newmark’s principal operating subsidiary, Newmark OpCo, issued approximately $175 million and $150 million of exchangeable preferred limited partnership units (“EPUs”), respectively, in private transactions to The Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”) (the “Newmark OpCo Preferred Investment”). Newmark received $152.9 million and $113.2 million of cash in the second and third quarter, respectively, of 2018 with respect to these transactions. The EPUs were issued in four tranches and are separately convertible by either RBC or Newmark into a fixed number of Newmark’s Class A common stock, subject to a revenue hurdle for Newmark in each of the fourth quarters of 2019 through 2022 for each of the respective four tranches. As the EPUs represent equity ownership of a consolidated subsidiary of Newmark, they have been included in Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity. The EPUs are entitled to a preferred payable-in-kind dividend, which is recorded as accretion to the carrying amount of the EPUs through Retained Earnings on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity and are reductions to Net income (loss) available to common stockholders for the purpose of calculating earnings per share.

13

Contemporaneously with the issuance of the EPUs, the newly formed special purpose vehicle entities (the “SPV s ”) that are consolidated subsidiaries of Newmark, entered into four variable postpaid forward contracts with RBC (together, the "RBC Forward s "). The SPV s are indirect subsidiaries of Newmark whose sole asset is the Nasdaq share Earn-outs for 2019 through 2022. The RBC Forward s provide the option to both Newmark and RBC for RBC to receive up to 992,247 shares of Nasdaq common stock, received by Newmark pursuant to the Nasdaq earn-out (see Note 6— Marketabl e Securities), in each of the fourth quarters of 2019 through 2022 in exchange for either cash or redemption of the EPUs, solely at Newmark’s option. The Nasdaq Earn-Out is related to BGC’s sale of its eSpeed business to Nasdaq, Inc. (“Nasdaq”) on June 28, 2013. The purchase consideration consisted of $750.0 million in cash paid upon closing, plus an expected payment of up to 14.9 million shares of Nasdaq common stock to be paid ratably over 15 years beginning in 2013, assuming that Nasdaq, as a whole, gene rates at least $25.0 million in gross revenues each of these years. In connection with the separation of Newmark from BGC, during the third quarter of 2017 BGC transferred to Newmark the right to receive the remainder of the Nasdaq earn-out payments.

As the RBC Forwards provide Newmark with the ability to redeem the EPUs for Nasdaq stock, and these instruments are not legally detachable, they represent single financial instruments. The financial instruments’ EPU redemption feature for Nasdaq common stock is not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of Newmark’s EPU equity host instruments, and, therefore, it represents an embedded derivative that is required to be bifurcated and recorded at fair value on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations, with all changes in fair value recorded as a component of ”Other income (losses), net” on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. See Note 10 — Derivatives for additional information.

Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”). The Newmark unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared on a stand-alone basis derived from the financial statements and accounting records of BGC. For the periods presented, prior to the IPO, Newmark was an unincorporated reportable segment of BGC. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the historical results of operations, financial position and cash flows of Newmark as it was historically managed and adjusted to conform with U.S. GAAP. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are presented as if Newmark had operated on a stand-alone basis for all periods presented. Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all of the BGC subsidiaries that comprise its real estate segment, all of which are controlled by BGC.

This Berkeley Point Acquisition has been determined to be a combination of entities under common control that resulted in a change in the reporting entity. Accordingly, the financial results of Newmark have been retrospectively adjusted to include the financial results of BPF in the current and prior periods as if BPF had always been consolidated. On December 13, 2017, in connection with the Separation, the assets and liabilities of BPF were transferred to Newmark. As of October 15, 2018, ARA, Berkeley Point, NKF Capital Markets, and Newmark Cornish & Carey all operate under the name “Newmark Knight Frank”.

Intercompany balances and transactions within Newmark have been eliminated. Transactions between Cantor or BGC and Newmark pursuant to service agreements between Cantor and BGC (see Note 25— Related Party Transactions), represent valid receivables and liabilities of Newmark, which are periodically cash settled, have been included in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as either receivables to or payables from related parties. Additionally, certain other transactions between BGC and Newmark are contributions of BGC’s net investment in Newmark including acquisitions prior to the IPO (see Note 4— Acquisitions).

Newmark receives administrative services to support its operations, and in return, Cantor and BGC allocate certain of their expenses to Newmark. Such expenses represent costs related, but not limited to, treasury, legal, accounting, information technology, payroll administration, human resources, incentive compensation plans and other services. These costs, together with an allocation of Cantor and BGC overhead costs, are included as expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. Where it is possible to specifically attribute such expenses to activities of Newmark, these amounts have been expensed directly to Newmark. Allocation of all other such expenses is based on a services agreement between Cantor and BGC which reflects the utilization of service provided or benefits received by Newmark during the periods presented on a consistent basis, such as headcount, square footage, revenue, etc. Management believes the assumptions underlying the stand-alone financial statements, including the assumptions regarding allocated expenses, reasonably reflect the utilization of services provided to or the benefit received by Newmark during the periods presented. However, these shared expenses may not represent the amounts that would have been incurred had Newmark operated independently from Cantor and BGC. Actual costs that would have been incurred if Newmark had been a stand-alone company would depend on multiple factors, including organizational structure and strategic decisions in various areas, including information technology and infrastructure. For an additional discussion of expense allocations, (see Note 25— Related Party Transactions).

14

Prior to the Separation, BGC used a centralized approach to cash management. Accordingly, excess cash and cash equivalents were held by BGC at the corporate level and were not attributed to Newmark for any of the periods presented. Transfers of cash, both to and from BGC’s centralized cash management system, are included in “current portion of payables to related parties” on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet and as part of the change in payments to and borrowings from related parties in the financing section within the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

The income tax provision in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income has been calculated as if Newmark was operating on a stand-alone basis and filed separate tax returns in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Newmark’s operations have historically been included in the BGC U.S. federal and state tax returns or separate non-U.S. jurisdictions tax returns. As Newmark operations in many jurisdictions are unincorporated commercial units of BGC and its subsidiaries, stand-alone tax returns have not been filed for the operations in these jurisdictions.

Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all normal and recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets, the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations, the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income, the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows and the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of changes in equity of Newmark for the periods presented.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting , which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification of related amounts within the statement of cash flows. The new standard was effective for Newmark beginning January 1, 2017, and early adoption was permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers , which relates to how an entity recognizes the revenue it expects to be entitled to for the transfer of promised goods and services to customers. Newmark adopted the standard as of its effective date of January 1, 2018 and recognized an increase in assets, liabilities, beginning retained earnings and non-controlling interests of $64.4 million, $45.6 million, $16.5 million and $2.3 million, respectively, as the cumulative effect of adoption of this accounting change. The impact of adoption is primarily related to Newmark’s brokerage revenues from leasing commissions where revenue recognition was previously deferred when future contingencies exist under the previous revenue recognition guidance. The adoption of the new revenue recognition guidance accelerated these commission revenues that were based, in part, on future contingent events. For example, a portion of certain brokerage revenues from leasing commissions were deferred until a future contingency was resolved (e.g., tenant move-in or payment of first month’s rent). Under the new revenue recognition model, Newmark’s performance obligation will be typically satisfied at lease signing and, therefore, the portion of the commission that is contingent on a future event will likely be recognized earlier, if it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur.  

Further, Newmark previously presented expenses incurred on behalf of customers for certain management services subject to reimbursement on a net basis within expenses. Under the new revenue recognition model, Newmark concluded that it controls the services provided by a third party on behalf of customers and, therefore, acts as a principal under those contracts. As a result, for these service contracts, Newmark will present expenses incurred on behalf of customers along with corresponding reimbursement revenue on a gross basis in Newmark’s condensed consolidated statements of operations, with no impact on net income available to common stockholders.

Newmark elected to adopt the new guidance using a modified retrospective approach applied to contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Accordingly, the new revenue standard is applied prospectively in Newmark’s financial statements from January 1, 2018 onward, and reported financial information for historical comparable periods is not revised and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect during those historical periods.

The new revenue recognition guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for under other U.S. GAAP, and as a result did not have an impact on the elements of Newmark’s condensed consolidated statements of operations most closely associated with financial instruments, including revenues from Capital markets commissions, Gains from mortgage banking activities/origination, net, and Servicing fees.

There was no significant impact as a result of applying the new revenue standard to Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, except as it relates to the revenue recognition of

15

certain brokerage revenues from leasing commissions that were based, in part, on future cont ingent events and the presentation of expenses incurred on behalf of customers for certain management services subject to reimbursement.

See Note 3— Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 12— Revenues from Contracts with Customers.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities . This ASU requires entities to measure equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method at fair value and recognize any changes in fair value in net income unless the investments qualify for the new practicability exception. Entities will also have to record changes in instrument-specific credit risk for financial liabilities measured under the fair value option in other comprehensive income. In addition, entities will be required to present enhanced disclosures of financial assets and financial liabilities. The guidance became effective beginning January 1, 2018. In September 2017, the FASB issued a Proposed ASU, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Recently Issued Standards: Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, that clarified certain aspects of the guidance. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)—Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments , which makes changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statements of cash flows. The new standard became effective beginning with the first quarter of 2018 and required adoption on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)—Restricted Cash , which requires that the statements of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The new standard became effective beginning January 1, 2018 and required adoption on a retrospective basis. The effect of this guidance resulted in the inclusion of restricted cash and cash segregated under regulatory requirements in the cash and cash equivalents balance on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805) Clarifying the definition of Business , which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of providing additional guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The new standard became effective beginning January 1, 2018 on a prospective basis. The adoption of this U.S. GAAP guidance did not have a material impact on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting , which amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements and provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting. Under this guidance, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, the vesting conditions, and the classification of the awards (as equity or liability) are the same immediately before and after the modification. The new standard became effective beginning January 1, 2018, on a prospective basis for awards modified on or after the adoption date. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) . This standard requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and lease liability for all leases with terms of more than 12 months. Recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses will depend on classification as a finance or operating lease. The amendments also require certain quantitative and qualitative disclosures. Accounting guidance for lessors is mostly unchanged. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases , to clarify how to apply certain aspects of the new leases standard. The amendments address the rate implicit in the lease, impairment of the net investment in the lease, lessee reassessment of lease classification, lessor reassessment of lease term and purchase options, variable payments that depend on an index or rate and certain transition adjustments, among other issues. In addition, in July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842), Targeted Improvements , which provides an additional (and optional) transition method to adopt the new leases standard. Under the new transition method, a reporting entity would initially apply the new lease requirements at the effective date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption; continue to report comparative periods presented in the financial statements in the period of adoption in accordance with current U.S. GAAP (i.e., ASC 840, Leases ); and provide the required disclosures under ASC 840 for all periods presented under current U.S. GAAP. Further ASU 2018-11 contains a new practical expedient that allows lessors to avoid separating lease and associated non-lease components within a contract if certain criteria are met. The guidance in ASUs 2016-02, 2018-10 and 2018-11 is effective beginning January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted.

16

Newmark plans to adopt the standards on their required effective date and use the effective date as the date of i nitial application. As a result, pursuant to this transition method financial information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the ne w leases standards will not be provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019. While management is continuing its implementation effort of the new guidance, by assessing all of the effects of adoption, Newmark, acting primarily as a lessee, currentl y believes the most significant effects will relate to the recognition of new ROU asset s and lease liabilit ies for its real estate and equipment operating leases.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments , which requires financial assets that are measured at amortized cost to be presented, net of an allowance for credit losses, at the amount expected to be collected over their estimated life. Expected credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as changes to credit losses during the period, are recognized in earnings. For certain purchased financial assets with deterioration in credit quality since origination, the initial allowance for expected credit losses will be recorded as an increase to the purchase price. Expected credit losses, including losses on off-balance-sheet exposures such as lending commitments, will be measured based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. The new standard will become effective for Newmark beginning January 1, 2020, under a modified retrospective approach, and early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment , which eliminates the requirement to determine the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit to measure goodwill impairment. Under the amendments in the new ASU, goodwill impairment testing will be performed by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognizing an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The new standard will become effective beginning January 1, 2020 and will be applied on a prospective basis, and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities . The guidance intends to better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. To meet that objective, the amendments expand and refine hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and align the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements. The new standard will become effective beginning January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted, and will be applied on a prospective basis and modified retrospective basis. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes. Based on concerns about the sustainability of LIBOR, in 2017, a committee convened by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York identified a broad Treasury repurchase agreement (repo) financing rate referred to as the SOFR as its preferred alternative reference rate. The guidance in ASU No. 2018-16 adds the OIS rate based on SOFR as a U.S. benchmark interest rate to facilitate the LIBOR to SOFR transition and provide sufficient lead time for entities to prepare for changes to interest rate risk hedging strategies for both risk management and hedge accounting purposes. The amendments in this ASU are required to be adopted concurrently with the guidance in ASU No. 2017-12. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income . The guidance helps organizations address certain stranded income tax effects in accumulated other comprehensive income resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 by providing an option to reclassify these stranded tax effects to retained earnings in each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (or portion thereof) is recorded. The new standard will become effective beginning January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The guidance should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is recognized. Management is currently evaluating the transition method and the adoption of the new guidance is not expected to have a material effect on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The guidance largely aligns the accounting for share-based payment awards issued to employees and nonemployees, whereby the existing employee guidance will apply to nonemployee share-based transactions (as long as the transaction is not effectively a form of financing), with the exception of specific guidance relate to the attribution of compensation cost. The cost of nonemployee awards will continue to be recorded as if the grantor had paid cash for the goods or services. In addition, the contractual term will be able to be used in lieu of an expected term in the option-pricing model for non-employee awards. The new standard will become effective Newmark beginning January 1, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. The ASU is required to

17

be applied on a prospective basis to all new awards granted after the date of adoption. In addition, any liability-classified awards that have not been settled and equity-classified awards for which a measurement date has not been established by the adoption date should be remeasured at fair value as of the adoption date with cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings in the year of adoption. Management expects to adopt this standard on its effective date. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to ha ve a material impact on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement . The guidance is part of the FASB’s disclosure framework project, whose objective and primary focus are to improve the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to financial statements. The ASU eliminates, amends and adds certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The FASB concluded that these changes improve the overall usefulness of the footnote disclosures for financial statement users and reduce costs for preparers. The new standard will become effective for Newmark beginning January 1, 2020 and early adoption is permitted for eliminated and modified fair value measurement disclosures. Certain disclosures are required to be applied prospectively and other disclosures need to be adopted retrospectively in the period of adoption. As permitted by the transition guidance in the ASU, Newmark’s early adoption eliminated and modified disclosure requirements as of September 30, 2018 and Newmark plans to adopt the remaining disclosure requirements effective January 1, 2020. The adoption of this standard did not impact Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. See Note 13 — “Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities” for additional information.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) . The guidance on the accounting for implementation, setup, and other upfront costs (collectively referred to as implementation costs) applies to entities that are a customer in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract. The amendments align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is not affected by the guidance in this ASU. The new standard will become effective for Newmark beginning January 1, 2020, should be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption, and early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Newmark is a holding company with no direct operations and conducts substantially all of its operations through its operating subsidiaries. Virtually all of Newmark’s consolidated net assets and net income are those of consolidated variable interest entities. Newmark Holdings is a consolidated subsidiary of Newmark for which Newmark is the general partner. Newmark and Newmark Holdings jointly own Newmark OpCo, the operating partnership. Listed below are the limited partnership interests in Newmark Holdings. In addition, Newmark OpCo issued approximately $325 million of exchangeable preferred limited partnership units in private transactions to RBC (see Note 1—Organization and Basis of Presentation ). The founding/working partner units, limited partnership units, limited partnership interests held by Cantor (“Cantor units”) and limited partnership interests held by BGC (“BGC units”), each as described below. In addition, BGC Partners and its operating subsidiaries hold limited partnership interest in Newmark Holdings due to the Investment in Newmark (see Note 25— Related Party Transactions). These collectively represent all of the “limited partnership interests” in BGC Holdings and Newmark Holdings.

BGC Holdings is a consolidated subsidiary of BGC, which along with BGC jointly own BGC U.S. OpCo and BGC Global OpCo, the two BCG operating partnerships. As a result of the Separation and Distribution Agreement, the limited partnership interests in Newmark Holdings were distributed to the holders of limited partnership interests in BGC Holdings, whereby each holder of BGC Holdings limited partnership interests at that time holds a BGC Holdings limited partnership interest and a corresponding Newmark Holdings limited partnership interest, which is equal to a BGC Holdings limited partnership interest multiplied by one divided by 2.2 (the “contribution ratio”), divided by the exchange ratio (which is the ratio by which a Newmark Holdings limited partnership interest can be exchanged for Newmark Class A common stock). Initially the exchange ratio equaled one, so that each Newmark Holdings limited partnership interest was exchangeable for one Newmark Class A common stock, however, such exchange ratio is subject to adjustment. For reinvestment, acquisition or other purposes, Newmark may determine on a quarterly basis to distribute to its stockholders a smaller percentage of its income than Newmark Holdings distributes to its equity holders (excluding tax distributions from Newmark Holdings) of cash that it received from Newmark OpCo. In such circumstances, the Separation and Distribution Agreement provides that the exchange ratio will be reduced to reflect the amount of additional cash retained by Newmark as a result of the distribution of such smaller percentage, after the payment of taxes. The exchange ratio as of September 30, 2018 equaled 0.9811.

18

Founding/Working Partner Units

Founding/working partners have a limited partnership interest in Newmark Holdings. Newmark accounts for founding/working partner units (“FPUs”) outside of permanent capital, as “Redeemable partnership interests,” in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements balance sheets. This classification is applicable to founding/working partner units because these units are redeemable upon termination of a partner, including a termination of employment, which can be at the option of the partner and not within the control of the issuer.

Founding/working partner units are held by limited partners who are primarily employees of BGC and generally receive quarterly allocations of net income. Upon termination of employment or otherwise ceasing to provide substantive services, the founding/working partner units are generally redeemed, and the unit holders are no longer entitled to participate in the quarterly allocations of net income. Since these allocations of net income are cash distributed on a quarterly basis and are contingent upon services being provided by the unit holder, they are reflected as a component of “Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests” in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations to the extent they related to Newmark employees.

Limited Partnership Units

Certain Newmark employees hold limited partnership interests in Newmark Holdings (e.g., REUs, RPUs, PSUs, PSIs and LPUs, collectively the “limited partnership units”). Generally, such limited partnership units receive quarterly allocations of net income, which are cash distributed and generally are contingent upon services being provided by the unit holders. As prescribed in U.S. GAAP guidance, the quarterly allocations of net income on such limited partnership units are reflected as a component of compensation expense under “Allocations of net income and grant of exchangeability to limited partnership units” in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. From time to time, Newmark issues limited partnership units as part of the consideration for acquisitions.

Certain of these limited partnership units entitle the holders to receive post-termination payments equal to the notional amount of the units in four equal yearly installments after the holder’s termination. These limited partnership units are accounted for as post-termination liability awards, and in accordance with U.S. GAAP guidance, Newmark records compensation expense for the awards based on the change in value at each reporting date in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations as part of “Compensation and employee benefits.”

Certain Newmark employees hold Preferred Units. Each quarter, the net profits of BGC Holdings and Newmark Holdings are allocated to such units at a rate of either 0.6875% (which is 2.75% per calendar year) or such other amount as set forth in the award documentation (the “Preferred Distribution”). These allocations are deducted before the calculation and distribution of the quarterly partnership distribution for the remaining partnership units and are generally contingent upon services being provided by the unit holder. The Preferred Units are not entitled to participate in partnership distributions other than with respect to the Preferred Distribution. Preferred Units may not be made exchangeable and are only entitled to the Preferred Distribution, and accordingly are not included in Newmark’s fully diluted share count. The quarterly allocations of net income on Preferred Units are reflected in compensation expense under “Allocations of net income and grant of exchangeability to limited partnership units” in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. After deduction of the Preferred Distribution, the remaining partnership units generally receive quarterly allocation of net income based on their weighted-average pro rate share of economic ownership of the operating subsidiaries.

Cantor Units

Cantor holds limited partnership interests in Newmark Holdings. Cantor units are reflected as a component of “Noncontrolling interests” in the Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. Cantor receives allocations of net income (loss), which are cash distributed on a quarterly basis and are reflected as a component of “Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests” in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

BGC Units

BGC and its operating subsidiaries hold limited partnership interests in Newmark Holdings. Such BGC units have been reflected as a component of “Noncontrolling interests” in the Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. BGC and its operating subsidiaries received allocations of net income (loss), which will be cash distributed on a quarterly basis and will be reflected as a component of “Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests” in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Exchangeable Preferred Limited Partnership Units

RBC holds approximately $325.0 million of EPUs in Newmark OpCo, as a result of the Newmark OpCo Preferred Investment.  The EPUs were issued in four tranches and are separately convertible by either RBC or Newmark into a fixed number of

19

Newmark’s Class A common stock, subject to a revenue hurdle for Newmark in each of the fourth quarters of 2019 through 2022 for each of the four tranches , respectively. As the EPUs represent equity ownership of a consolidated subsidiary of New mark, they have been included in “Noncontrolling interests” on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity. The EPUs are entitled to a preferred payable-in-kind dividend, which is recorded as accretion to the carrying amount of the EPUs through retained earnings on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity and are included in “Net income available to common stockholders” for the purpose of calculating earnings per share.

General

Certain of the limited partnership interests, described above, have been granted exchangeability into BGC Class A common stock, and additional limited partnership interests may become exchangeable for BGC and/or Newmark Class A common stock. In addition, the limited partnership interests held by Cantor in BGC Holdings and Newmark Holdings are generally exchangeable for up to 34.6 million shares of BGC Class B common stock and/or up to the authorized amount of Newmark Class B common stock. In order for a partner or Cantor to exchange a limited partnership interest in BGC Holdings or Newmark Holdings into a Class A or Class B common stock of BGC, such partner or Cantor must exchange both one BGC Holdings limited partnership interests and a number of Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests equal to a BGC Holdings limited partnership interest multiplied by the quotient obtained by dividing Newmark Class A and Class B common stock, Newmark OpCo interests, and Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests held by BGC as of such time by the number of BGC Class A and Class B common stock outstanding as of such time (the “distribution ratio”), divided by the exchange ratio. Initially the distribution ratio was equivalent to the contribution ratio (one divided by 2.2 or 0.4545), and immediately following the close of the third quarter of 2018, the distribution ratio equaled 0.4640. As of November 7, 2018, Newmark estimates the distribution ratio on the date of the spin-off will be 0.4613 (see Note 30 – Subsequent Events). As a result of the change in the distribution ratio, certain BGC Holdings limited partnership interests no longer have a corresponding Newmark Holdings limited partnership interest. The exchangeability of these BGC Holdings limited partnership interests along with any new BGC Holdings limited partnership interests issued after the Separation and Distribution Agreement (together referred to as “standalone”) into BGC Class A or Class B common stock is contingent upon the Newmark spin-off. After the spin-off, these standalone BGC limited partnership interests can then become exchangeable into BGC Class A or Class B common stock.

Each quarter, net income (loss) is allocated between the limited partnership interests and the common stockholders. In quarterly periods in which Newmark has a net loss, the loss allocation for FPUs, limited partnership units (including BGC units and Cantor units) is allocated to Cantor and reflected as a component of “Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests” in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. In subsequent quarters in which Newmark has net income, the initial allocation of income to the limited partnership interests is to “Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests,” to recover any losses taken in earlier quarters, with the remaining income allocated to the limited partnership interests. This income (loss) allocation process has no impact on the net income (loss) allocated to common stockholders.

For a detailed discussion about Newmark’s significant accounting policies, see Note 3— Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Other than the following, during the nine months ended September 30, 2018, there were no significant changes made to Newmark’s significant accounting policies.

Equity Investments

Effective January 1, 2018, in accordance with the new guidance on recognition and measurement of equity investments, Newmark carries its marketable equity securities at fair value and recognizes any changes in fair value in net income (loss). Further, Newmark has elected to use a measurement alternative for its equity investments without a readily determinable fair value, pursuant to which these investments are initially recognized at cost and remeasured through earnings when there is an observable transaction involving the same or similar investment of the same issuer, or due to an impairment. See Note 6— Marketable Securities and Note 7— Investments for additional information. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, Newmark had realized gains, net of $1.5 million related to the sale of marketable securities. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, Newmark had unrealized gains/(losses), net of $(0.6) million and $0.9 million, respectively, related to the mark to market of Newmark’s marketable securities.

Revenue Recognition

The accounting policy changes are attributable to the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from contracts with Customers and related amendments on January 1, 2018. These revenue recognition policy updates are applied prospectively in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements from January 1, 2018 onward. Financial information for the historical

20

comparable periods was not revised and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect during those historical periods.

Commissions:

For certain revenues based, in part, on future contingent events (e.g., tenant move-in or payment of first month’s rent), Newmark’s performance obligation is typically satisfied at lease signing and, therefore, the portion of the commission that is contingent on a future event is recognized as revenue, if deemed not subject to significant reversal.

Restricted Cash:

Represents cash set aside for amounts pledged for the benefit of Fannie Mae in excess of the required cash to secure Newmark’s financial guarantee liability.

Segment

Newmark has a single operating segment. Newmark is a real estate services firm offering services to commercial real estate tenants, owner occupiers, investors and developers, leasing and corporate advisory, investment sales and real estate finance, consulting, origination and servicing of commercial mortgage loans, valuation, project and development management and property and facility management. The chief operating decision maker regardless of geographic location evaluates the operating results of Newmark as total real estate services and allocates resources accordingly. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, Newmark recognized revenues as follows (in thousands):

(4) Acquisitions

During April of 2018, Newmark completed the acquisition of two former Integra Realty Resources (“IRR”) offices (Boston and Pittsburgh). IRR specializes in commercial real estate valuation and advisory services, and the acquisition provides Newmark with greater geographic coverage.

In July 2018, Newmark completed the acquisition of two additional IRR offices (Denver and Pasadena) as well as Dallas based Jackson & Cooksey, Inc., a nationally known corporate tenant representation real estate agency.

In September 2018, Newmark completed the acquisition of RKF Retail Holdings, LLC (“RKF”). RKF is a leading independent real estate firm in North America specializing in retail leasing, investment sales and consulting services.

21

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the following tables summarize the components of the purchase consideration transferred, and the preliminary allocation of the as sets acquired and liabilities assumed. Newmark expects to finalize its analysis of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed within the first year of the acquisition, and therefore adjustments to assets and liabilities may occur.

The total consideration for acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was approximately $58.8 million in total fair value, comprised of cash and Newmark Holdings limited partnership units. The total consideration included contingent consideration of approximately 412,090 Newmark’s Holding partnership units (with an acquisition date fair value of approximately $5.7 million), restricted stock of approximately 216,900 (with an acquisition date fair value of approximately $3.1 million) and $8.2 million in cash that may be issued contingent on certain targets being met through 2021. The excess of the consideration over the fair value of the net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill of approximately $38.4 million, of which $23.4 million is deductible by Newmark for tax purposes.

These acquisitions are accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The results of operations of these acquisitions have been included in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements subsequent to their respective dates of acquisition, which in aggregate contributed $8.9 million and $9.9 million to Newmark’s revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively.

On September 8, 2017, Newmark acquired from CCRE 100% of the equity of BPF. The Berkeley Point Acquisition has been determined to be a combination of entities under common control that resulted in a change in the reporting entity (see Note 1— Organization and Basis of Presentation).

The assets and liabilities of BPF have been recorded in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets at the seller’s historical carrying value. The excess of the purchase price over BPF’s net assets was accounted for as an equity transaction for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the period in which the transaction occurred). See Note 1— Organization and Basis of Presentation for additional information.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to basis differences between the carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Accordingly, a deferred tax asset of $108.6 million has been contributed to Newmark for the year ended December 31, 2017 for the basis difference between BPF’s net assets and its tax basis.

On January 13, 2017, Newmark acquired a San Francisco-based advisory firm, Regency Capital Partners (“Regency”). Regency specializes in structured debt and equity for large office and multi-family developments.

On July 26, 2017, Newmark acquired an approximately 50% controlling interest in a joint venture. Cantor owns a noncontrolling interest of 25% of the company, which is headquartered in New York, NY and specializes in commercial real estate due diligence.

22

In September 2017, Newmark completed the acquisition of six former Integra Realty Resources offices (Washington DC, Baltimore, Willmington, DE, New York/New Jersey, Philadelphia and Atlanta offices). These firms specialize in valuation services, and the acquisition provides Newmark with greater geographic coverage.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the following tables summarize the components of the purchase consideration transferred, and the preliminary allocation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, for all acquisitions other than the Berkeley Point Acquisition, based on the fair values of the acquisition date. Newmark expects to finalize its analysis of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed within the first year of the acquisition, and therefore adjustments to assets and liabilities may occur.

The total consideration for acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $55.6 million in total fair value, comprised of cash, and BGC Holdings limited partnership units. The total consideration included contingent consideration of approximately 477,169 BGC’s Holding partnership units (with an acquisition date fair value of approximately $5.0 million) and $1.3 million in cash that may be issued contingent on certain targets being met through 2020. The excess of the consideration over the fair value of the net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill of approximately $64.3 million, of which $45.4 million is deductible by Newmark for tax purposes.

These acquisitions are accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The results of operations of these acquisitions have been included in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements subsequent to their respective dates of acquisition, which in aggregate contributed $13.1 million to Newmark’s revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017.

U.S. GAAP guidance—Earnings Per Share provides guidance on the computation and presentation of earnings per share (“EPS”). Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing Net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding and contingent shares for which all necessary conditions have been satisfied except for the passage of time. Net income (loss) is allocated to Newmark’s outstanding common stock, FPUs, limited partnership units, Cantor units and BGC units (see Note 2— Limited Partnership Interests). In addition, in relation to the Newmark OpCo Preferred Investment, the EPUs issued in June 2018 and September 2018 are entitled to a preferred payable-in-kind dividend which is recorded as accretion to the carrying amount of the EPUs and is a reduction to Net income (loss) available to common stockholders for the calculation of Newmark’s Basic earnings (loss) per share and Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share.

23

The following is the calculation of Newmark’s basic EPS (in thousands, except per share data):

Fully diluted EPS is calculated utilizing net income (loss) available to common stockholders plus net income allocations to the limited partnership interests in Newmark Holdings as the numerator. The denominator comprises Newmark’s weighted-average number of outstanding shares of common stock and, if dilutive, the weighted-average number of limited partnership interests and other contracts to issue shares of common stock, stock options and RSUs. The limited partnership interests generally are potentially exchangeable into shares of Class A common stock and are entitled to remaining earnings after the deduction for the Preferred Distribution; as a result, they are included in the fully diluted EPS computation to the extent that the effect would be dilutive.

The following is the calculation of Newmark’s fully diluted EPS (in thousands, except per share data):

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, there were 77.4 million and 70.5 million potentially dilutive securities, respectively, that were excluded from the computation of fully diluted EPS as they would have had an anti-dilutive effect.

On June 28, 2013, BGC sold certain assets of its on-the-run, electronic benchmark U.S. Treasury platform (“eSpeed”) to Nasdaq. The total consideration received by BGC in the transaction included an earn-out of up to 14,883,705 shares of Nasdaq common stock to be paid ratably over 15 years, provided that Nasdaq, as a whole, produces at least $25.0 million in consolidated gross revenues each year (the “Nasdaq Earn-Out”). The Nasdaq Earn-Out was excluded from the initial gain on the divestiture and is recognized in income as it is realized and earned when these contingent events have occurred, consistent with the accounting guidance for gain contingencies. The remaining rights under the Nasdaq Earn-Out were transferred to Newmark on September 28, 2017. Any Nasdaq shares that were received by BGC prior to September 28, 2017 were not transferred to Newmark.

24

In connection with t he Nasdaq Earn-Out, Newmark earned 992,247 shares during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 992,247 shares during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 . Newmark will recognize the remaining Nasdaq Earn-Out of up to 8,930,223 shares of Nasdaq common stock ratably over the next approximately 9 years, provided that Nasdaq, as a whole, produces at least $25.0 million in gross revenues each year. During the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, in connection with the Nas daq Earn-Out, Newmark recognized $ 85.1 million and $ 77.0 million, respectively , which is included in “Other income (loss)” in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet .

For further information, refer to the section titled “Exchangeable Preferred Partnership Units and Forward Contract” in Note 1— Organization and Basis of Presentation, see Note 10— Derivatives and see Note 24— Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, Newmark sold 650,000 of the Nasdaq shares received in 2017. In November of 2017, Newmark sold 242,247 shares and has 100,000 remaining shares as of September 30, 2018. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the gross proceeds of the shares sold was $51.4 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, Newmark recognized a gain on the sale of these securities of $1.5 million. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, Newmark also recorded an unrealized gain/(loss) of $(0.6) million and $0.9 million, respectively on the mark to market of these securities, which is included in “Other income (loss)” in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, Newmark had $93.7 million and $57.6 million, respectively included in “Marketable securities” on its unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet (see Note 18— Securities Loaned).

Newmark has a 27% ownership in Real Estate LP, a joint venture with Cantor in which Newmark has the ability to exert significant influence over the operating and financial policies. Accordingly, Newmark accounts for this investment under the equity method of accounting. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, Newmark recognized $0.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively of equity income included in “Other income (loss)” in its unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, Newmark had $103.6 million and $101.6 million, respectively in an equity method investment, and is included in “Other assets” in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Investments Carried Under Measurements Alternatives

Newmark had previously acquired investments for which it did not have the ability to exert significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investees. Prior to January 1, 2018, these investments were accounted for using the cost method in accordance with U.S. GAAP guidance, Investments—Other . The carrying value of the cost method investments was $6.0 million and is included in “Other assets” in the Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017. Newmark did not recognize any gain or loss relating to cost method investments for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Effective January 1, 2018, these investments are accounted for using the measurement alternative in accordance with the new guidance on recognition and measurement. The carrying value of these investments was $28.7 million and is included in “Other assets” in the Newmark’s unaudited condensed statements balance sheets as of September 30, 2018. Newmark did not recognize any gains, losses, or impairments relating to investments carried under the measurement alternative for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018.

In addition, Newmark owns membership shares, which are included in “Other Assets” in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Prior to January 1, 2018, these shares were accounted for using the cost method in accordance with U.S. GAAP guidance, Investments—Other . Effective January 1, 2018, these shares are accounted for using the measurement alternative in accordance with the new guidance on recognition and measurement. During the three months ended September 30, 2018, there were no observable transactions to trigger an adjustment to the fair value of these shares. Newmark did not recognize any gains, losses or impairment charges on these shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Newmark is subject to various capital requirements in connection with seller/servicer agreements that Newmark has entered into with the various GSEs. Failure to maintain minimum capital requirements could result in Newmark’s inability to originate and service loans for the respective GSEs and could have a direct material adverse effect on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. Management believes that, as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, Newmark has met all capital requirements. As of September 30, 2018, the most restrictive capital requirement was Fannie Mae’s net worth requirement. Newmark exceeded the minimum requirement by $475.1 million.

25

Certain of Newmark’s agreements with Fannie Mae allow Newmark to originate and service loans under Fannie Mae’s DUS Program. These agreements require Newmark to maintain sufficient collateral to meet Fannie Mae’s restricted and operational liquidity requirements based on a pre-establishe d formula. Certain of Newmark’s agreements with Freddie Mac allow Newmark to service loans under Freddie Mac’s Targeted Affordable Housing Program (“TAH”). These agreements require Newmark to pledge sufficient collateral to meet Freddie Mac’s liquidity req uirement of 8% of the outstanding principal of TAH loans serviced by Newmark. Management believes that, as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, Newmark has met all liquidity requirements.

In addition, as a servicer for Fannie Mae, GNMA and FHA, Newmark is required to advance to investors any uncollected principal and interest due from borrowers. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, outstanding borrower advances were approximately $0.4 million and $0.1 million respectively, and are included in “Other assets” in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Loans held for sale, at Fair Value represent originated loans that are typically sold within 45 days from the date of the mortgage loan is funded. Newmark initially and subsequently measures all loans held for sale at fair value on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. The fair value measurement falls within the definition of a Level 2 measurement (significant other observable inputs) within the fair value hierarchy. Electing to use fair value allows a better offset of the change in the fair value of the loan and the change in fair value of the derivative instruments used as economic hedges. Loans held for sale had a cost basis and fair value as follows (in thousands):

As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, there were no loans held for sale that were 90 days or more past due or in nonaccrual status.

During the period prior to its sale, interest income on a loan held for sale is calculated in accordance with the terms of the individual loan. Interest income on loans held for sale was $10.3 million and $19.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, and $5.7 million and $24.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively. Interest income on loans held for sale is included in “Management services, servicing fees and other” in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. Newmark recognized a loss of $6.8 million and a gain of $0.5 million, respectively, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, and gains of $0.6 million and $0.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, for the change in fair value on loans held for sale. These gains were included in “Gains from mortgage banking activities/originations, net” in Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Newmark accounts for its derivatives at fair value, and recognized all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in its unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. In its normal course of business, Newmark enters into commitments to extend credit for mortgage loans at a specific rate (rate lock commitments) and commitments to deliver these loans to third-party investors at a fixed price (forward sale contracts). These transactions are accounted for as derivatives.

The fair value of derivative contracts, computed in accordance with the Newmark’s netting policy, is set forth below (in thousands):