|
ITEM
1.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
|
PACIFIC
ETHANOL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
62,581
|
|
|
$
|
49,489
|
|
Accounts receivable, net (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $64 and $19, respectively)
|
|
|
72,518
|
|
|
|
80,344
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
67,305
|
|
|
|
61,550
|
|
Prepaid inventory
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
7,634
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
8,871
|
|
|
|
7,584
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
220,705
|
|
|
|
203,246
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
495,274
|
|
|
|
508,352
|
|
Other Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
6,020
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
7,253
|
|
|
|
8,698
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
723,232
|
|
|
$
|
720,296
|
|
*
Amounts
derived from the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
PACIFIC
ETHANOL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except par value)
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable – trade
|
|
$
|
40,966
|
|
|
$
|
39,738
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
21,790
|
|
|
|
21,673
|
|
Current portion – capital leases
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
Current portion – long-term debt
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
10,157
|
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
6,567
|
|
|
|
6,396
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
99,642
|
|
|
|
90,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
237,771
|
|
|
|
221,091
|
|
Capital leases, net of current portion
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
25,457
|
|
|
|
24,676
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
362,971
|
|
|
|
336,596
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Ethanol, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A: 1,684 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B: 1,581 shares authorized; 927 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017; liquidation preference of $18,075 as of June 30, 2018
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 300,000 shares authorized; 44,960 and 43,985 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Non-voting common stock, $0.001 par value; 3,553 shares authorized; 1 share issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
928,378
|
|
|
|
927,090
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2,234
|
)
|
|
|
(2,234
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(589,838
|
)
|
|
|
(568,462
|
)
|
Total Pacific Ethanol, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
336,352
|
|
|
|
356,439
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
23,909
|
|
|
|
27,261
|
|
Total Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
360,261
|
|
|
|
383,700
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
$
|
723,232
|
|
|
$
|
720,296
|
|
*
Amounts
derived from the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
PACIFIC
ETHANOL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited,
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
410,522
|
|
|
$
|
405,202
|
|
|
$
|
810,549
|
|
|
$
|
791,542
|
|
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
411,795
|
|
|
|
403,549
|
|
|
|
808,460
|
|
|
|
795,662
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
(1,273
|
)
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
|
|
2,089
|
|
|
|
(4,120
|
)
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
8,898
|
|
|
|
8,762
|
|
|
|
18,213
|
|
|
|
14,212
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(10,171
|
)
|
|
|
(7,109
|
)
|
|
|
(16,124
|
)
|
|
|
(18,332
|
)
|
Fair value adjustments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,177
|
)
|
|
|
(2,694
|
)
|
|
|
(8,682
|
)
|
|
|
(5,331
|
)
|
Other
income (expense), net
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
Loss before benefit for income
taxes
|
|
|
(14,604
|
)
|
|
|
(9,938
|
)
|
|
|
(24,664
|
)
|
|
|
(23,423
|
)
|
Benefit
for income taxes
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consolidated net loss
|
|
|
(14,604
|
)
|
|
|
(9,938
|
)
|
|
|
(24,101
|
)
|
|
|
(23,423
|
)
|
Net
loss attributed to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
3,352
|
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
Net
loss attributed to Pacific Ethanol, Inc.
|
|
$
|
(12,908
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,841
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,749
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,477
|
)
|
Preferred
stock dividends
|
|
$
|
(315
|
)
|
|
$
|
(315
|
)
|
|
$
|
(627
|
)
|
|
$
|
(627
|
)
|
Loss
available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(13,223
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,156
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,376
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,104
|
)
|
Net
loss per share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.31
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.52
|
)
|
Weighted-average
shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
|
|
43,285
|
|
|
|
42,295
|
|
|
|
43,098
|
|
|
|
42,334
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
PACIFIC
ETHANOL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss
|
|
$
|
(24,101
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,423
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net loss to net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
20,418
|
|
|
|
18,408
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(563
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Fair value adjustments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(473
|
)
|
Amortization of debt discount
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
Inventory valuation adjustment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
Non-cash compensation
|
|
|
1,695
|
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
Loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
7,781
|
|
|
|
39,835
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(5,755
|
)
|
|
|
(3,273
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(1,437
|
)
|
|
|
(4,454
|
)
|
Prepaid inventory
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
(486
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
(14,273
|
)
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
|
|
15,091
|
|
Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(7,340
|
)
|
|
|
(6,229
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(7,340
|
)
|
|
|
(6,229
|
)
|
Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from Kinergy’s line of credit
|
|
|
22,551
|
|
|
|
5,295
|
|
Proceeds from assessment financing
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net proceeds from notes
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,530
|
|
Principal payments on borrowings
|
|
|
(6,500
|
)
|
|
|
(4,500
|
)
|
Payments on capital leases
|
|
|
(626
|
)
|
|
|
(386
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of warrants and options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
Preferred stock dividends paid
|
|
|
(627
|
)
|
|
|
(627
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
15,526
|
|
|
|
14,002
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
13,092
|
|
|
|
22,864
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
49,489
|
|
|
|
68,590
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
62,581
|
|
|
$
|
91,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
7,598
|
|
|
$
|
4,852
|
|
Income tax refunds received
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Noncash financing and investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclass of warrant liability to equity upon warrant exercises
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
PACIFIC
ETHANOL, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
1.
|
ORGANIZATION
AND
BASIS OF PRESENTATION.
|
Organization
and Business
– The consolidated financial statements include, for all periods presented, the accounts of Pacific
Ethanol, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Pacific Ethanol”), and its direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively,
the “Company”), including its subsidiaries, Kinergy Marketing LLC, an Oregon limited liability company (“Kinergy”),
Pacific Ag. Products, LLC, a California limited liability company (“PAP”), PE Op Co., a Delaware corporation (“PE
Op Co.”) and all nine of the Company’s ethanol production facilities.
The
Company’s acquisition of Illinois Corn Processing, LLC (“ICP”) was consummated on July 3, 2017, and as a result,
the Company’s accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of ICP only as of December 31, 2017 and
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.
The
Company is a leading producer and marketer of low-carbon renewable fuels in the United States. The Company has a combined production
capacity of 605 million gallons per year, markets, on an annualized basis, nearly 1.0 billion gallons of ethanol and specialty
alcohols, and produces, on an annualized basis, over 3.0 million tons of co-products on a dry matter basis, such as wet and dry
distillers grains, wet and dry corn gluten feed, condensed distillers solubles, corn gluten meal, corn germ, dried yeast and CO
2
.
The
Company owns and operates nine production facilities, four in the Western states of California, Oregon and Idaho, and five in
the Midwestern states of Illinois and Nebraska.
The
Company’s four ethanol plants in the Western United States (together with their respective holding companies, the “Pacific
Ethanol West Plants”) are located in close proximity to both feed and ethanol customers and thus enjoy unique advantages
in efficiency, logistics and product pricing. These plants produce among the lowest-carbon ethanol produced in the United States
due to low energy use in production.
The
Company’s five ethanol plants in the Midwest (together with their respective holding companies, the “Pacific Ethanol
Central Plants”) are located in the heart of the Corn Belt, benefit from low-cost and abundant feedstock production and
allow for access to many additional domestic markets. In addition, the Company’s ability to load unit trains from these
facilities in the Midwest allows for greater access to international markets.
As
of June 30, 2018, all nine facilities were operating. As market conditions change, the Company may increase, decrease or idle
production at one or more operational facilities or resume operations at any idled facility.
Basis
of Presentation
–
Interim Financial Statements
– The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial
statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Results for interim
periods should not be considered indicative of results for a full year. These interim consolidated financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. The accounting policies used in preparing these consolidated financial
statements are the same as those described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, with the exception of revenue recognition, as discussed further below. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair statement
of the results for interim periods have been included. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation.
Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
– Trade accounts receivable are presented at face value, net of the
allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company sells ethanol to gasoline refining and distribution companies, sells distillers grains
and other feed co-products to dairy operators and animal feedlots and sells corn oil to poultry and biodiesel customers generally
without requiring collateral.
The
Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for balances that appear to have specific collection issues. The collection
process is based on the age of the invoice and requires attempted contacts with the customer at specified intervals. If, after
a specified number of days, the Company has been unsuccessful in its collection efforts, a bad debt allowance is recorded for
the balance in question. Delinquent accounts receivable are charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts once uncollectibility
has been determined. The factors considered in reaching this determination are the apparent financial condition of the customer
and the Company’s success in contacting and negotiating with the customer. If the financial condition of the Company’s
customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Of
the accounts receivable balance, approximately $56,412,000 and $64,501,000 at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively,
were used as collateral under Kinergy’s operating line of credit. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $64,000 and $19,000
as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The Company recorded a bad debt recovery of $2,000 and $5,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company recorded a bad debt expense of $45,000 and $2,000 for the
six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company does not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related
to its customers.
Benefit
for Income Taxes
– The Company recognized a tax benefit of $563,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 due to
the Company’s reduction of its deferred tax asset valuation allowance due to the taxable losses incurred during the period.
Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017, losses incurred after 2017 can be carried forward indefinitely.
The Company does not expect additional tax benefits to be recognized during 2018 due to this provision. The Company recognized
no tax benefit for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 due to the uncertainty
of using its tax losses to offset future taxable income. To the extent the Company believes it can utilize its tax losses, the
Company will adjust its benefit for income taxes accordingly in future periods.
Comprehensive
Loss
– The Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss relates to the Company’s pension plans. For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company’s consolidated loss and comprehensive loss were substantially
the same amount.
Noncontrolling
Interests
– For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the changes to noncontrolling interests represented
the net loss attributed to noncontrolling interests, with no other adjustment for the periods.
Financial
Instruments
– The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued
liabilities are reasonable estimates of their fair values because of the short maturity of these items. The Company believes the
carrying value of its long-term debt approximates fair value because the interest rates on these instruments are variable, and
are considered Level 2 fair value measurements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
– In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
new guidance on accounting for leases. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases
(with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: (1) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation
to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted cash flow basis; and (2) a “right of use” asset,
which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use the specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance,
lessor accounting is largely unchanged, with some minor exceptions. Lessees will no longer be provided with a source of off-balance
sheet financing for other than short-term leases. The standard is effective for public companies for annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company expects that upon adoption
of this accounting standard, right of use assets and lease obligations will be recognized in its consolidated balance sheets in
amounts that will be material.
In
May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance on the recognition of revenue (“ASC 606”). ASC 606 states that an entity should
recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration
to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard is effective for annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. In March and April 2016, the
FASB issued further revenue recognition guidance amending principal vs. agent considerations regarding whether an entity should
recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration
to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services.
The
provisions of ASC 606 include a five-step process by which an entity will determine revenue recognition, depicting the transfer
of goods or services to customers in amounts reflecting the payment to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for
those goods or services. ASC 606 requires the Company to apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract with the customer;
(2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price
to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies the performance obligation.
Effective
January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method for all of its contracts. Following the adoption
of ASC 606, the Company continues to recognize revenue at a point-in-time when control of goods transfers to the customer. This
is consistent with the Company’s previous revenue recognition accounting policy under which the Company recognized revenue
when title and risk of loss pass to the customer and collectability was reasonably assured. In addition, ASU 606 did not impact
the Company’s presentation of revenue on a gross or net basis.
The
Company recognizes revenue primarily from sales of ethanol and its related co-products.
The
Company has nine ethanol production facilities from which it produces and sells ethanol to its customers through Kinergy. Kinergy
enters into sales contracts with ethanol customers under exclusive intercompany ethanol sales agreements with each of the Company’s
nine ethanol plants. Kinergy also acts as a principal when it purchases third party ethanol which it resells to its customers.
Finally, Kinergy has exclusive sales agreements with other third-party owned ethanol plants under which it sells their ethanol
production for a fee plus the costs to deliver the ethanol to Kinergy’s customers. These sales are referred to as third-party
agent sales. Revenue from these third-party agent sales is recorded on a net basis, with Kinergy recognizing its predetermined
fees and any associated delivery costs.
The
Company has nine ethanol production facilities from which it produces and sells co-products to its customers through PAP. PAP
enters into sales contracts with co-product customers under exclusive intercompany co-product sales agreements with each of the
Company’s nine ethanol plants.
The
Company recognizes revenue from sales of ethanol and co-products at the point in time when the customer obtains control of such
products, which typically occurs upon delivery depending on the terms of the underlying contracts. In some instances, the Company
enters into contracts with customers that contain multiple performance obligations to deliver volumes of ethanol or co-products
over a contractual period of less than 12 months. The Company allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation identified
in the contract based on relative standalone selling prices and recognizes the related revenue as control of each individual product
is transferred to the customer in satisfaction of the corresponding performance obligations.
When
the Company is the agent, the supplier controls the products before they are transferred to the customer because the supplier
is primarily responsible for fulfilling the promise to provide the product, has inventory risk before the product has been transferred
to a customer and has discretion in establishing the price for the product. When the Company is the principal, the Company controls
the products before they are transferred to the customer because the Company is primarily responsible for fulfilling the promise
to provide the products, has inventory risk before the product has been transferred to a customer and has discretion in establishing
the price for the product.
The
Company accounts for shipping and handling costs relating to contracts with customers as costs to fulfill its promise to transfer
its products. Accordingly, the costs are classified as a component of cost of goods sold. See Note 2 for the Company’s revenue
by type of contracts.
Estimates
and Assumptions
– The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates are required as part of determining the allowance for doubtful
accounts, net realizable value of inventory, estimated lives of property and equipment, long-lived asset impairments, valuation
allowances on deferred income taxes and the potential outcome of future tax consequences of events recognized in the Company’s
financial statements or tax returns, and the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of business combinations.
Actual results and outcomes may materially differ from management’s estimates and assumptions.
The
Company reports its financial and operating performance in two segments: (1) ethanol production, which includes the production
and sale of ethanol, specialty alcohols and co-products, with all of the Company’s production facilities aggregated, and
(2) marketing and distribution, which includes marketing and merchant trading for Company-produced ethanol, specialty alcohols
and co-products and third-party ethanol.
The
following tables set forth certain financial data for the Company’s operating segments (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production, recorded as gross:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol/alcohol sales
|
|
$
|
233,888
|
|
|
$
|
197,657
|
|
|
$
|
453,517
|
|
|
$
|
382,112
|
|
Co-product sales
|
|
|
78,514
|
|
|
|
58,468
|
|
|
|
153,048
|
|
|
|
117,087
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
Total production sales
|
|
|
312,941
|
|
|
|
256,313
|
|
|
|
607,578
|
|
|
|
499,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol/alcohol sales, gross
|
|
$
|
97,634
|
|
|
$
|
148,644
|
|
|
$
|
203,063
|
|
|
$
|
291,526
|
|
Ethanol/alcohol sales, net
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
2,330
|
|
|
|
1,963
|
|
|
|
4,555
|
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
Total marketing sales
|
|
|
100,450
|
|
|
|
151,040
|
|
|
|
208,539
|
|
|
|
296,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment eliminations
|
|
|
(2,869
|
)
|
|
|
(2,151
|
)
|
|
|
(5,568
|
)
|
|
|
(4,299
|
)
|
Net sales as reported
|
|
$
|
410,522
|
|
|
$
|
405,202
|
|
|
$
|
810,549
|
|
|
$
|
791,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
$
|
320,631
|
|
|
$
|
254,570
|
|
|
$
|
619,064
|
|
|
$
|
505,155
|
|
Marketing and distribution
|
|
|
94,203
|
|
|
|
151,130
|
|
|
|
195,135
|
|
|
|
294,806
|
|
Intersegment eliminations
|
|
|
(3,039
|
)
|
|
|
(2,151
|
)
|
|
|
(5,739
|
)
|
|
|
(4,299
|
)
|
Cost of goods sold as reported
|
|
$
|
411,795
|
|
|
$
|
403,549
|
|
|
$
|
808,460
|
|
|
$
|
795,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before benefit for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
$
|
(17,210
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,304
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,609
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,619
|
)
|
Marketing and distribution
|
|
|
4,929
|
|
|
|
(1,435
|
)
|
|
|
10,677
|
|
|
|
(1,286
|
)
|
Corporate activities
|
|
|
(2,323
|
)
|
|
|
(2,199
|
)
|
|
|
(5,732
|
)
|
|
|
(3,518
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(14,604
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,938
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,664
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,423
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
$
|
10,045
|
|
|
$
|
9,016
|
|
|
$
|
19,977
|
|
|
$
|
17,862
|
|
Corporate activities
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,253
|
|
|
$
|
9,299
|
|
|
$
|
20,418
|
|
|
$
|
18,408
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
|
$
|
3,724
|
|
|
$
|
2,211
|
|
Marketing and distribution
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
Corporate activities
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
|
|
2,510
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,177
|
|
|
$
|
2,694
|
|
|
$
|
8,682
|
|
|
$
|
5,331
|
|
The
following table sets forth the Company’s total assets by operating segment (in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
$
|
567,322
|
|
|
$
|
583,696
|
|
Marketing and distribution
|
|
|
150,255
|
|
|
|
127,242
|
|
Corporate assets
|
|
|
5,655
|
|
|
|
9,358
|
|
|
|
$
|
723,232
|
|
|
$
|
720,296
|
|
Inventories
consisted primarily of bulk ethanol, specialty alcohols, corn, co-products, low-carbon and Renewable Identification Number (“RIN”)
credits and unleaded fuel, and are valued at the lower-of-cost-or-net realizable value, with cost determined on a first-in, first-out
basis. Inventory is net of a $2,678,000 valuation adjustment as of December 31, 2017. Inventory balances consisted of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
42,279
|
|
|
$
|
35,652
|
|
Work in progress
|
|
|
8,115
|
|
|
|
8,807
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
7,834
|
|
|
|
7,601
|
|
Low-carbon and RIN credits
|
|
|
7,461
|
|
|
|
7,952
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,616
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
67,305
|
|
|
$
|
61,550
|
|
The
business and activities of the Company expose it to a variety of market risks, including risks related to changes in commodity
prices. The Company monitors and manages these financial exposures as an integral part of its risk management program. This program
recognizes the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to reduce the potentially adverse effects that market volatility
could have on operating results.
Commodity
Risk
–
Cash Flow Hedges
– The Company uses derivative instruments to protect cash flows from
fluctuations caused by volatility in commodity prices for periods of up to twelve months in order to protect gross profit margins
from potentially adverse effects of market and price volatility on ethanol sale and purchase commitments where the prices are
set at a future date and/or if the contracts specify a floating or index-based price for ethanol. In addition, the Company hedges
anticipated sales of ethanol to minimize its exposure to the potentially adverse effects of price volatility. These derivatives
may be designated and documented as cash flow hedges and effectiveness is evaluated by assessing the probability of the anticipated
transactions and regressing commodity futures prices against the Company’s purchase and sales prices. Ineffectiveness, which
is defined as the degree to which the derivative does not offset the underlying exposure, is recognized immediately in cost of
goods sold. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company did not designate any of its derivatives as
cash flow hedges.
Commodity
Risk – Non-Designated Hedges
– The Company uses derivative instruments to lock in prices for certain amounts
of corn and ethanol by entering into exchange-traded forward contracts for those commodities. These derivatives are not designated
for special hedge accounting treatment. The changes in fair value of these contracts are recorded on the balance sheet and recognized
immediately in cost of goods sold. The Company recognized losses of $2,909,000 and $568,000 as the changes in the fair values
of these contracts for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company recognized losses of $3,370,000
and $352,000 as the changes in the fair values of these contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Non
Designated Derivative Instruments
– The classification and amounts of the Company’s derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments, and related cash collateral balances, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
As of June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Type of Instrument
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash collateral balance
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
5,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
7,634
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
10,157
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Type of Instrument
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash collateral balance
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
3,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
998
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
2,307
|
|
The
classification and amounts of the Company’s recognized gains (losses) for its derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
Realized Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Type of Instrument
|
|
Statements of Operations Location
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
(499
|
)
|
|
$
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Type of Instrument
|
|
Statements of Operations Location
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
(2,410
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Type of Instrument
|
|
Statements of Operations Location
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,918
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Type of Instrument
|
|
Statements of Operations Location
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
(1,213
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,566
|
|
Long-term borrowings are summarized as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
June 30,
2018
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
Kinergy line of credit
|
|
$
|
72,028
|
|
|
$
|
49,477
|
|
Pekin term loan
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
53,500
|
|
Pekin revolving loan
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
ICP term loan
|
|
|
19,500
|
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
ICP revolving loan
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
Parent notes payable
|
|
|
68,948
|
|
|
|
68,948
|
|
|
|
|
260,476
|
|
|
|
244,425
|
|
Less unamortized debt discount
|
|
|
(1,052
|
)
|
|
|
(1,409
|
)
|
Less unamortized debt financing costs
|
|
|
(1,653
|
)
|
|
|
(1,925
|
)
|
Less short-term portion
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
237,771
|
|
|
$
|
221,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kinergy Operating Line of
Credit
– As of June 30, 2018, Kinergy had additional borrowing availability under its credit facility of $2,612,000.
Pekin Term Loan
– On
March 30, 2018, Pacific Ethanol Pekin, LLC (“PE Pekin”), one of the Company’s subsidiaries, amended its term
loan facility by reducing the amount of working capital it is required to maintain to not less than $13.0 million from March 31,
2018 through November 30, 2018 and not less than $16.0 million from December 1, 2018 and continuing at all times thereafter. In
addition, a principal payment in the amount of $3.5 million due for May 2018 was deferred until the maturity date of the term loan.
As of the filing of this report, the Company believes PE Pekin is in compliance with its working capital requirement.
Pacific Aurora Line of Credit
– On March 30, 2018, Pacific Aurora, LLC, a majority owned subsidiary of the Company, terminated its revolving credit facility,
which was unused during the three months ended March 31, 2018. As a result, the Company fully amortized its deferred financing
fees of $0.3 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.
Distribution Restrictions
– At June 30, 2018, there were approximately $196.0 million of net assets at the Company’s subsidiaries that were not
available to be transferred to Pacific Ethanol, Inc. in the form of dividends, loans or advances due to restrictions contained
in the credit facilities of the Company’s subsidiaries.
|
6.
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES.
|
Sales Commitments
–
At June 30, 2018, the Company had entered into sales contracts with its major customers to sell certain quantities of ethanol and
co-products. The Company had open ethanol indexed-price contracts for 297,162,000 gallons of ethanol as of June 30, 2018 and open
fixed-price ethanol sales contracts totaling $76,289,000 as of June 30, 2018. The Company had open fixed-price co-product sales
contracts totaling $22,713,000 and open indexed-price co-product sales contracts for 697,000 tons as of June 30, 2018. These sales
contracts are scheduled to be completed throughout 2018.
Purchase Commitments
–
At June 30, 2018, the Company had indexed-price purchase contracts to purchase 8,774,000 gallons of ethanol and fixed-price purchase
contracts to purchase $6,109,000 of ethanol from its suppliers. The Company had fixed-price purchase contracts to purchase $28,453,000
of corn from its suppliers as of June 30, 2018. These purchase commitments are scheduled to be satisfied throughout 2018.
Litigation –
General
–
The Company is subject to various claims and contingencies in the ordinary course of its business,
including those related to litigation, business transactions, employee-related matters, environmental regulations and others.
When the Company is aware of a claim or potential claim, it assesses the likelihood of any loss or exposure. If it is
probable that a loss will result and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company will record a liability
for the loss. If the loss is not probable or the amount of the loss cannot be reasonably estimated, the Company discloses the
claim if the likelihood of a potential loss is reasonably possible and the amount involved could be material. While there can
be no assurances, the Company does not expect that any of its pending legal proceedings will have a material impact on the
Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
The Company assumed certain legal matters
which were ongoing at July 1, 2015, the date of the Company’s acquisition of Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc. (“PE
Central”). Among them were lawsuits between Aventine Renewable Energy, Inc. (now known as Pacific Ethanol Pekin, LLC) and
Glacial Lakes Energy, Aberdeen Energy and Redfield Energy, together, the “Defendants,” in which PE Pekin sought damages
for breach of termination agreements that wound down ethanol marketing arrangements between PE Pekin and each of the Defendants.
In February and March 2017, the Company and the Defendants entered into settlement agreements and the Defendants paid in cash to
the Company $3.9 million in final resolution of these matters. The Company did not assign any value to the claims against the Defendants
in its accounting for the PE Central acquisition as of July 1, 2015. The Company recorded a gain, net of legal fees, of $3.6 million
upon receipt of the cash settlement and recognized the gain as a reduction to selling, general and administrative expenses in the
consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
|
7.
|
PENSION AND RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS.
|
The Company sponsors
a defined benefit pension plan (the “Retirement Plan”) and a health care and life insurance plan (the “Postretirement
Plan”). The Company assumed the Retirement Plan and the Postretirement Plan as part of its acquisition of PE Central on July
1, 2015.
The Retirement Plan is
noncontributory, and covers only “grandfathered” unionized employees at the Company’s Pekin, Illinois facility
who fulfill minimum age and service requirements. Benefits are based on a prescribed formula based upon the employee’s years
of service. The Retirement Plan, which is part of a collective bargaining agreement, covers only union employees hired prior to
November 1, 2010.
The Company uses a December
31 measurement date for its Retirement Plan. The Company’s funding policy is to make the minimum annual contribution required
by applicable regulations. As of December 31, 2017, the Retirement Plan’s accumulated projected benefit obligation was $19.7
million, with a fair value of plan assets of $14.0 million. The underfunded amount of $5.7 million is recorded on the Company’s
consolidated balance sheet in other liabilities.
Of the net periodic expense
for the Retirement Plan and Postretirement Plan, the Company recognizes the service cost component in cost of goods sold and the
interest cost, expected return on plan assets and amortization of gain (loss) in other income (expense), net.
The Company’s net
periodic Retirement Plan costs are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
348
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
Net periodic expense
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
The Postretirement Plan
provides postretirement medical benefits and life insurance to certain “grandfathered” unionized employees. Employees
hired after December 31, 2000 are not eligible to participate in the Postretirement Plan. The Postretirement Plan is contributory,
with contributions required at the same rate as active employees. Benefit eligibility under the plan reduces at age 65 from a defined
benefit to a defined dollar cap based upon years of service. As of December 31, 2017, the Postretirement Plan’s accumulated
projected benefit obligation was $5.6 million and is recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet in other liabilities.
The Company’s funding policy is to make the minimum annual contribution required by applicable regulations.
The Company’s net
periodic Postretirement Plan costs are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Amortization of (gain) loss
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Net periodic expense
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS.
|
The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the
inputs used in valuation techniques into three levels, as follows:
|
●
|
Level 1 – Observable inputs – unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets and liabilities;
|
|
●
|
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable
for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data; and
|
|
●
|
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs – includes amounts derived from valuation models where
one or more significant inputs are unobservable. For fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, a description
of the inputs and the information used to develop the inputs is required along with a reconciliation of Level 3 values from the
prior reporting period.
|
Pooled Separate Accounts
– Pooled separate accounts invest primarily in domestic and international stocks, commercial paper or single mutual funds.
The net asset value is used as a practical expedient to determine fair value for these accounts. Each pooled separate account provides
for redemptions by the Retirement Plan at reported net asset values per share, with little to no advance notice requirement, therefore
these funds are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
Other Derivative Instruments
– The Company’s other derivative instruments consist of commodity positions. The fair values of the commodity positions
are based on quoted prices on the commodity exchanges and are designated as Level 1 inputs.
The following table summarizes recurring fair value measurements
by level at June 30, 2018 (in thousands):
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
7,634
|
|
|
$
|
7,634
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
(10,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The following tables compute basic and
diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
Loss
Numerator
|
|
|
Shares Denominator
|
|
|
Per-Share Amount
|
|
Net loss attributed to Pacific Ethanol, Inc.
|
|
$
|
(12,908
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(13,223
|
)
|
|
|
43,285
|
|
|
$
|
(0.31
|
)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
Loss
Numerator
|
|
|
Shares Denominator
|
|
|
Per-Share Amount
|
|
Net loss attributed to Pacific Ethanol, Inc.
|
|
$
|
(8,841
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(9,156
|
)
|
|
|
42,295
|
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
Loss
Numerator
|
|
|
Shares Denominator
|
|
|
Per-Share Amount
|
|
Net loss attributed to Pacific Ethanol, Inc.
|
|
$
|
(20,749
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(627
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(21,376
|
)
|
|
|
43,098
|
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
Loss
Numerator
|
|
|
Shares Denominator
|
|
|
Per-Share Amount
|
|
Net loss attributed to Pacific Ethanol, Inc.
|
|
$
|
(21,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(627
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(22,104
|
)
|
|
|
42,334
|
|
|
$
|
(0.52
|
)
|
There were an aggregate of 1,606,000 and
721,000 potentially dilutive weighted-average shares from convertible securities outstanding for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2018, respectively. These convertible securities were not considered in calculating diluted net loss per share for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
|
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
|
The following discussion
and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this report. This report and our consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements
contain forward-looking statements, which generally include the plans and objectives of management for future operations, including
plans and objectives relating to our future economic performance and our current beliefs regarding revenues we might generate and
profits we might earn if we are successful in implementing our business and growth strategies. The forward-looking statements and
associated risks may include, relate to or be qualified by other important factors, including:
|
●
|
fluctuations in the market price of ethanol and its co-products;
|
|
●
|
fluctuations
in the costs of key production input commodities such as corn and natural gas;
|
|
●
|
the projected growth or contraction in the ethanol
and co-product markets in which we operate;
|
|
●
|
our strategies for expanding, maintaining or contracting
our presence in these markets;
|
|
●
|
anticipated trends
in our financial condition and results of operations; and
|
|
●
|
our ability
to distinguish ourselves from our current and future competitors.
|
You are cautioned not
to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report, or in the case of a
document incorporated by reference, as of the date of that document. We do not undertake to update, revise or correct any forward-looking
statements, except as required by law.
Any of the factors described
immediately above, or referenced from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in the “Risk
Factors” section below could cause our financial results, including our net income or loss or growth in net income or loss
to differ materially from prior results, which in turn could, among other things, cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate
substantially.
Overview
We are a leading producer and marketer of
low-carbon renewable fuels in the United States.
We operate nine strategically-located production
facilities. Four of our plants are in the Western states of California, Oregon and Idaho, and five of our plants are located in
the Midwestern states of Illinois and Nebraska. We are the sixth largest producer of ethanol in the United States based on annualized
volumes. Our plants have a combined production capacity of 605 million gallons per year. We market all the ethanol, specialty alcohols
and co-products produced at our plants as well as ethanol produced by third parties. On an annualized basis, we market nearly 1.0
billion gallons of ethanol and over 3.0 million tons of co-products on a dry matter basis. Our business consists of two operating
segments: a production segment and a marketing segment.
Our mission is to advance our position and
significantly increase our market share as a leading producer and marketer of low-carbon renewable fuels and high-quality alcohol
products in the United States. We intend to accomplish this goal in part by expanding our ethanol production capacity and distribution
infrastructure, accretive acquisitions, lowering the carbon intensity of our ethanol, extending our marketing business into new
regional and international markets, and implementing new technologies to promote higher production yields and greater efficiencies.
Production Segment
We produce ethanol, specialty alcohols and
co-products at our production facilities described below. Our plants located on the West Coast are near their respective fuel and
feed customers, offering significant timing, transportation cost and logistical advantages. Our plants located in the Midwest are
in the heart of the Corn Belt, benefit from low-cost and abundant feedstock production and allow for access to many additional
domestic markets. In addition, our ability to load unit trains from our plants located in the Midwest, and barges from our Pekin,
Illinois plants, allows for greater access to international markets.
We wholly-own all of our plants located
on the West Coast and the three plants in Pekin, Illinois. We own approximately 74% of the two plants in Aurora, Nebraska as well
as the grain elevator adjacent to those properties and related grain handling assets, including the outer rail loop, and the real
property on which they are located, through Pacific Aurora, LLC, or Pacific Aurora, an entity owned approximately 26% by Aurora
Cooperative Elevator Company.
Facility
Name
|
Facility
Location
|
Estimated
Annual Capacity
(gallons)
|
Magic Valley
|
Burley, ID
|
60,000,000
|
Columbia
|
Boardman, OR
|
40,000,000
|
Stockton
|
Stockton, CA
|
60,000,000
|
Madera
|
Madera, CA
|
40,000,000
|
Aurora West
|
Aurora, NE
|
110,000,000
|
Aurora East
|
Aurora, NE
|
45,000,000
|
Pekin Wet
|
Pekin, IL
|
100,000,000
|
Pekin Dry
|
Pekin, IL
|
60,000,000
|
Pekin ICP
|
Pekin, IL
|
90,000,000
|
We produce ethanol co-products at our production
facilities such as wet distillers grains, or WDG, dried distillers grains with solubles, or DDGS, wet and dry corn gluten feed,
condensed distillers solubles, corn gluten meal, corn germ, corn oil, dried yeast and CO
2
.
Marketing Segment
We market ethanol, specialty alcohols and
co-products produced by our facilities and market ethanol produced by third parties. We have extensive customer relationships throughout
the Western and Midwestern United States. Our ethanol customers are integrated oil companies and gasoline marketers who blend ethanol
into gasoline. Our customers depend on us to provide a reliable supply of ethanol, and manage the logistics and timing of delivery
with very little effort on their part. Our customers collectively require ethanol volumes in excess of the supplies we produce
at our production facilities. We secure additional ethanol supplies from third-party plants in California and other third-party
suppliers in the Midwest where a majority of ethanol producers are located. We arrange for transportation, storage and delivery
of ethanol purchased by our customers through our agreements with third-party service providers in the Western United States as
well as in the Midwest from a variety of sources.
We market our distillers grains and other
feed co-products to dairies and feedlots, in many cases located near our ethanol plants. These customers use our feed co-products
for livestock as a substitute for corn and other sources of starch and protein. We sell our corn oil to poultry and biodiesel customers.
We do not market co-products from other ethanol producers.
See “Note 2 – Segments”
to our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report for financial information about our business
segments.
Outlook
Our
results for the first half of 2018 reflect a compressed and volatile margin environment. Significantly higher corn freight costs
and resulting corn basis costs into our Western facilities reduced production margins. In addition, the Environmental Protection
Agency’s, or EPA’s, continued practice of granting small refinery exemptions from the Renewable Fuel Standard, or
RFS, negatively impacted ethanol margins. Also, escalating trade positioning between the Unites States and China, which resulted
in early April in additional tariffs placed on United States ethanol shipped to China, halted United States ethanol exports to
China, resulting in higher industry-wide inventory levels which further pressured margins.
Despite
a challenging first-half, industry fundamentals remain strong and should support better margins. Ethanol
remains a low-cost, high-value, low-carbon renewable fuel and source of octane. Moreover, blending ethanol into gasoline
reduces the price of gasoline to consumers. We believe these compelling blend economics will drive higher domestic and
international blend rates.
We
are actively engaged, including through industry trade associations, with the EPA to achieve Reid vapor pressure (RVP) parity
to allow for higher ethanol blends year-round; to maintain the EPA’s renewable volume obligation (RVO) targets consistent
with the law; and to be more judicious in granting small refinery economic hardship exemptions and, when granted, to reallocate those
gallons to all other obligated parties. While we do not anticipate that any of these outcomes will affect the balance of 2018,
we do anticipate positive movement in 2019 to allow for year-round blending of E15.
Domestic
gasoline demand remains firm at approximately 1.5% higher year-over-year. At 10% blend ratios, each 1.0% increase in average
annual gasoline demand in the United States would result in demand for an additional 140 million gallons of ethanol.
Moreover, as the market migrates to higher ethanol blend ratios, each 1.0% increase in aggregate blend ratios across the
United States gasoline pool, at current levels of gasoline demand, would result in demand for an additional 1.4 billion
gallons of ethanol.
International
demand for ethanol set records in 2017 and remains on pace to exceed those records in 2018, with approximately 30 countries
having renewable fuel standards or targets. United States ethanol exports from January through June 2018 reached 928 million
gallons, up 33% from the same period in 2017 and on pace to significantly exceed the 1.37 billion gallons exported for all of
2017. More countries are importing ethanol from the United States as it represents a low-cost source of high-octane and
low-carbon transportation fuel. Japan recently announced its intention to allow United States ethanol to meet up to 44% of a
total estimated annual demand of 217 million gallons of ethanol used to make ethyl tert-butyl ether, or ETBE, an oxygenate
gasoline additive, or the equivalent of approximately 100 million gallons of United States-sourced ethanol annually. Prior to the halt
of United States exports to China, China had returned earlier in the year as a significant buyer of United States-sourced
ethanol, supporting its announced 10% blending requirement by 2020. If China continues to pursue this goal, even while
rapidly increasing its own domestic ethanol production, it will require significant ethanol imports, ultimately supporting
the continued growth in overall international demand for ethanol.
Carbon
values in our California and Oregon markets are increasing, resulting in continued and growing premiums for our lower-carbon ethanol.
In California, carbon prices currently exceed $185 per metric ton. Over the past year, California carbon prices have risen steadily
to an average of $154 per metric ton in June 2018 from $77 per metric ton at the same time last year. Earlier this year, the California
Air Resources Board announced changes to extend and increase carbon reduction requirements imposed on refiners through 2030, requiring
them to reduce carbon levels to 20% below 2010 levels. Carbon values in Oregon have also improved, with prices currently over
$80 per metric ton for our lower-carbon ethanol produced at our Oregon facility. Over the past year, Oregon carbon prices have
risen steadily to an average of $69 per metric ton in June 2018 from $45 per metric at the same time last year.
We
continue to focus on implementing initiatives and investing in our assets to reduce costs, improve yields and carbon scores, and
build our long-term value. We are engaged in several plant-level capital projects with near-term paybacks designed to increase
output of high-value co-products such as corn oil, corn gluten meal and yeast. We are also working with our ingredient suppliers
to reduce costs and increase ethanol yields.
Our
acquisition of ICP in July 2017 provided product diversification, bringing us high-quality alcohol products, which help support
stronger margins and reduce our exposure to commodity price fluctuations in the fuel ethanol market. We recently completed our
integration of ICP and achieved our goal of $4.5 million in annualized cost synergies in 2018.
Our
3.5 megawatt cogeneration system at our Stockton plant has not yet achieved full commercial operation. The manufacturer of the
system’s natural gas fired cogeneration units is handling modifications to meet performance standards. The system converts
process waste gas and natural gas into electricity and steam, reducing energy costs by up to $4.0 million per year and lowering
carbon and nitrogen oxide emissions.
We
completed our 5 megawatt solar photovoltaic power system at our Madera facility. The system is operating at 70% capacity and we
anticipate full electricity production by the fourth quarter, once PG&E, our electricity provider, has completed its final
upgrades to its adjacent substation. We expect the system to reduce our utility costs by approximately $1.0 million annually and
lower our carbon score.
Airgas
has begun construction of a liquid CO
2
production plant adjacent to our Stockton facility. We expect to commence production
and begin generating revenues from this arrangement in the fourth quarter of 2018.
We
continue to produce commercial levels of cellulosic ethanol and generate D3 RINs at our Stockton plant. However, we continue to
suspend production of cellulosic ethanol at our Madera and Magic Valley plants due to delays in EPA approval of our cellulosic
ethanol pathways for those plants. We believe these delays result from a negative political environment at the EPA towards advanced
biofuels but we are hopeful that we will obtain EPA approval under new regulatory leadership. Once approved, production from these
three plants will generate additional combined EBITDA of $2.0 million annually.
Our
capital expenditures for the first quarter of 2018 totaled $7.4 million and were primarily related to plant improvement initiatives.
We expect our 2018 capital expenditures to remain in-line with our 2017 expenditure level, although we may adjust this amount based on industry economics and our financial performance.
We
plan to drive growth by leveraging our diverse base of production and marketing assets to advance our position and significantly
increase market share as a leading producer and marketer of low-carbon renewable fuels and high-quality alcohol products in the
United States. The foundations of this strategy are our strategically located bio-refineries, which enable us to serve multiple
markets; the diversity of our production, geography, technology, feedstocks and logistics, which helps us mitigate exposure to
commodity price risks within fuel markets; and our focus on evaluating and investing in plant improvement and other initiatives
to increase production and operating efficiencies and yields.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America, requires us to make judgments and estimates that may have a significant impact upon the portrayal of our financial
condition and results of operations. We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following require estimates and
assumptions that require complex, subjective judgments by management that can materially impact the portrayal of our financial
condition and results of operations: revenue recognition; impairment of long-lived assets; valuation of allowance for deferred
taxes; derivative instruments; accounting for business combinations; and allowance for doubtful accounts. These significant accounting
principles are more fully described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations—Critical Accounting Policies” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Results of Operations
The following selected
financial information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes to our consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this report, and the other sections of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” contained in this report.
Certain performance metrics
that we believe are important indicators of our results of operations include:
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
Production gallons sold (in millions)
|
|
|
144.4
|
|
|
|
120.0
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
|
285.2
|
|
|
|
235.0
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
Third party gallons sold (in millions)
|
|
|
83.0
|
|
|
|
115.8
|
|
|
|
(28.3
|
)%
|
|
|
174.9
|
|
|
|
227.0
|
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)%
|
Total gallons sold (in millions)
|
|
|
227.4
|
|
|
|
235.8
|
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
|
|
460.1
|
|
|
|
462.0
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gallons produced (in millions)
|
|
|
143.2
|
|
|
|
121.8
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
285.4
|
|
|
|
239.7
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
Production capacity utilization
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average sales price per gallon
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corn cost per bushel – CBOT equivalent
|
|
$
|
3.82
|
|
|
$
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
3.69
|
|
|
$
|
3.66
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
Average basis
(1)
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
Delivered cost of corn
|
|
$
|
4.11
|
|
|
$
|
3.91
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
3.98
|
|
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total co-product tons sold (in thousands)
|
|
|
794.0
|
|
|
|
734.4
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
1,592.0
|
|
|
|
1,419.9
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
Co-product
revenues as % of delivered cost of corn
(2)
|
|
|
35.7
|
%
|
|
|
33.5
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
36.4
|
%
|
|
|
34.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average CBOT ethanol price per gallon
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
$
|
1.53
|
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
Average CBOT corn price per bushel
|
|
$
|
3.83
|
|
|
$
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
3.75
|
|
|
$
|
3.66
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Corn basis represents the difference between the immediate cash price of delivered
corn and the future price of corn for Chicago delivery.
|
|
(2)
|
Co-product revenues as a percentage of delivered cost of corn shows our yield
based on sales of co-products, including WDG and corn oil, generated from ethanol we produced.
|
Net Sales, Cost
of Goods Sold and Gross Profit (Loss)
The following table
presents our net sales, cost of goods sold and gross profit (loss) in dollars and gross profit (loss) as a percentage of net sales
(in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Variance
in
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Variance
in
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
410,522
|
|
|
$
|
405,202
|
|
|
$
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
810,549
|
|
|
$
|
791,542
|
|
|
$
|
19,007
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
411,795
|
|
|
|
403,549
|
|
|
|
8,246
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
808,460
|
|
|
|
795,662
|
|
|
|
12,798
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,273
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,653
|
|
|
$
|
(2,926
|
)
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
$
|
2,089
|
|
|
$
|
(4,120
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,209
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
The increase in our
net sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017 was primarily due to an
increase in our production gallons sold, partially offset by our reduction in third party gallons sold. We increased our
production gallons sold primarily due to increased volumes attributed to our ICP facility, which we acquired on July 3, 2017.
We sold fewer third party gallons as we deliberately focused our third party ethanol sales in regions where we have either a
stronger presence around our own production assets or more favorable margins.
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018
On a consolidated basis,
our average sales price per gallon remained flat at $1.66 for the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period
in 2017. The average Chicago Board of Trade, or CBOT, ethanol price per gallon, however, decreased 6.5% to $1.45 for the three
months ended June 30, 2018 compared to an average CBOT ethanol price per gallon of $1.55 for the same period in 2017.
Production Segment
Net sales of ethanol
from our production segment increased by $36.2 million, or 18%, to $233.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared
to $197.7 million for the same period in 2017. Our total volume of production ethanol gallons sold increased by 24.4 million gallons,
or 20%, to 144.4 million gallons for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to 120.0 million gallons for the same period
in 2017. Our production segment’s average sales price per gallon decreased 1.8% to $1.62 for the three months ended June
30, 2018 compared to our production segment’s average sales price per gallon of $1.65 for the same period in 2017. At our
production segment’s average sales price per gallon of $1.62 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, we generated $39.5
million in additional net sales from our production segment from the 24.4 million additional gallons of produced ethanol sold in
the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. The decline of $0.03 in our production segment’s
average sales price per gallon for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017 reduced our net
sales of ethanol from our production segment by $3.3 million.
Net sales of co-products
increased $20.0 million, or 34%, to $78.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to $58.5 million for the
same period in 2017. Our total volume of co-products sold increased by 59.6 thousand tons, or 8%, to 794.0 thousand tons for three
months ended June 30, 2018 from 734.4 thousand tons for the same period in 2017, and our average sales price per ton increased
to $98.88 for the three months ended June 30, 2018 from $79.61 for the same period in 2017. At our average sales price per ton
of $98.88 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, we generated $5.9 million in additional net sales from the 59.6 thousand tons
of additional co-products sold in the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. The increase of
$19.27, or 24%, in our average sales price per ton for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017
increased net sales of co-products by $14.1 million.
Marketing Segment
Net sales of ethanol from our marketing
segment decreased by $51.0 million, or 34%, to $98.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to $149.1 million
for the same period in 2017. Our total volume of ethanol gallons sold by our marketing segment decreased by 8.4 million gallons,
or 3.6%, to 227.4 million gallons for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to 235.8 million gallons for the same period
in 2017. Of these amounts, we sold 32.8 million fewer third party gallons, which was partially offset by 24.4 million additional
production gallons sold by our marketing segment.
The increase in production gallons sold
by our marketing segment resulted in an increase of $0.4 million in net sales generated by our marketing segment, which were eliminated
upon consolidation.
Our marketing segment’s average sales
price per gallon increased $0.05, or 3%, to $1.72 for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to $1.67 for the same period
in 2017. At our marketing segment’s average sales price per gallon of $1.72 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, we
generated $56.5 million less in net sales from our marketing segment from the 32.8 million fewer third party gallons sold in the
three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. The increase of $0.05 in our marketing segment’s
average sales price per gallon for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017 increased our net
sales from third party ethanol sold by our marketing segment by $5.5 million.
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018
On a consolidated basis,
our average sales price per gallon decreased 1.8% to $1.61 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to our average sales
price per gallon of $1.64 for the same period in 2017. The average CBOT ethanol price per gallon decreased 5.9% to $1.44 for the
six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to an average CBOT ethanol price per gallon of $1.53 for the same period in 2017.
Production Segment
Net sales of ethanol
from our production segment increased by $71.4 million, or 19%, to $453.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared
to $382.1 million for the same period in 2017. Our total volume of production ethanol gallons sold increased by 50.2 million gallons,
or 21%, to 285.2 million gallons for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to 235.0 million gallons for the same period
in 2017. Our production segment’s average sales price per gallon decreased 2% to $1.58 for the six months ended June 30,
2018 compared to our production segment’s average sales price per gallon of $1.61 for the same period in 2017. At our production
segment’s average sales price per gallon of $1.58 for the six months ended June 30, 2018, we generated $79.2 million in additional
net sales from our production segment from the 50.2 additional gallons of produced ethanol sold in the six months ended June 30,
2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. The decline of $0.03 in our production segment’s average sales price per gallon
for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017 reduced our net sales of ethanol from our production
segment by $7.8 million.
Net sales of co-products
increased $36.0 million, or 31%, to $153.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to $117.0 million for the
same period in 2017. Our total volume of co-products sold increased by 172.1 thousand tons, or 12%, to 1,592.0 thousand tons for
six months ended June 30, 2018 from 1,419.9 thousand tons for the same period in 2017, and our average sales price per ton increased
to $96.14 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 from $82.47 for the same period in 2017. At our average sales price per ton of
$96.14 for the six months ended June 30, 2018, we generated $16.6 million in additional net sales from the 172.1 thousand tons
of additional co-products sold in the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. The increase of $13.67,
or 17%, in our average sales price per ton for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017 increased
net sales of co-products by $19.4 million.
Marketing Segment
Net sales of ethanol from our marketing
segment decreased by $88.5 million, or 30%, to $203.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to $291.6 million
for the same period in 2017. Our total volume of ethanol gallons sold by our marketing segment decreased by 1.9 million gallons,
or 0.4%, to 460.1 million gallons for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to 462.0 million gallons for the same period
in 2017. Of these amounts, we sold 52.1 million fewer third party gallons, which was partially offset by 50.2 million additional
production gallons sold by our marketing segment.
The increase in production gallons sold
by our marketing segment resulted in an increase of $0.8 million in net sales generated by our marketing segment, which were eliminated
upon consolidation.
Our marketing segment’s average sales
price per gallon decreased $0.01, or less than 1%, to $1.64 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to $1.65 for the
same period in 2017. At our marketing segment’s average sales price per gallon of $1.64 for the six months ended June 30,
2018, we generated $85.2 million less in net sales from our marketing segment from the 52.1 million fewer third party gallons sold
in the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. Further, the decline of $0.01 in our marketing segment’s
average sales price per gallon for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017 reduced our net sales
from third party ethanol sold by our marketing segment by $3.3 million.
Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit
(Loss)
Our consolidated gross profit declined primarily
due to significantly lower commodity margins in the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same periods in 2017.
Significantly higher corn
freight costs and resulting corn basis costs into our Western facilities compressed production margins. In addition, ethanol
margins were negatively impacted by the EPA’s continued practice of granting small refinery exemptions from the
Renewable Fuel Standard and trade tariffs that have halted United States ethanol exports to China, resulting in higher
industry wide inventory levels which further pressured margins.
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018
Our consolidated gross profit declined to
a gross loss of $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to gross profit of $1.7 million for the same
period in 2017, representing a negative gross margin of 0.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to a positive
gross margin of 0.4% for the same period in 2017.
Production Segment
Our production segment’s gross profit
from external sales declined by $9.4 million to a gross loss of $7.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared
to a gross profit of $1.7 million for the same period in 2017. Of this amount, $8.1 million is attributable to our production segment’s
lower margins for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, and $1.3 million is attributable
to increased production volumes at negative production margins for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same
period in 2017.
Gross profit generated by
our production segment was negatively impacted by higher than expected repairs and maintenance expense at our Pekin, Illinois
wet mill facility. Our results for the second quarter of 2018 include final costs associated with these boilers of
approximately $1.5 million. We have experienced larger than anticipated expenses since the second half of 2015 related to the
repair, and then replacement, of two package boilers that failed shortly prior to our acquisition of our Midwest assets in
2015. We have resolved these boiler issues, which totaled $11.0 million in 2017, and anticipate that wet mill boiler expenses
associated with these issues will be eliminated going forward. We continue to pursue a claim against the boiler manufacturer
which will result, however, in ongoing litigation expenses.
Marketing Segment
Our marketing segment’s gross profit
improved by $ 6.4 million to $6.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to breakeven for the same period
in 2017. Of this increase, $10.6 million is attributable to our marketing segment’s improved margins per gallon for the three
months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, partially offset by $4.2 million in lower gross profit attributable
to the 32.8 million gallon reduction in third-party marketing volumes for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the
same period in 2017.
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018
Our consolidated gross profit improved by
$6.2 million to a gross profit of $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to gross loss of $4.1 million
for the same period in 2017, representing a gross margin of 0.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to a negative
gross margin of 0.5% for the same period in 2017.
Production Segment
Our production segment’s gross profit
from external sales declined by $6.0 million to a gross loss of $11.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared
to a gross loss of $5.5 million for the same period in 2017. Of this decline, $4.0 million is attributable to our production segment’s
lower margins for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, and $2.0 million is attributable to
increased production volumes at negative production margins for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period
in 2017.
Gross profit generated by our
production segment was negatively impacted by $4.1 million in higher than expected repairs and maintenance expense at our
Pekin, Illinois wet mill facility for the six months ended June 30, 2018. We have experienced larger than anticipated
expenses since the second half of 2015 related initially to the repair, and then replacement, of two package boilers
that failed shortly prior to our acquisition of our Midwest assets in 2015. We have resolved these boiler issues, which
totaled $11.0 million in 2017, and anticipate that wet mill boiler expenses associated with these issues will be eliminated
going forward. We continue to pursue a claim against the boiler manufacturer which will result, however, in ongoing
litigation expenses.
Marketing Segment
Our marketing segment’s gross profit
improved by $12.2 million to $13.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to $1.4 million for the same period
in 2017. Of this increase, $16.2 million is attributable to our marketing segment’s improved margins for the six months ended
June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, partially offset by $4.0 million in lower gross profit attributable to the
52.1 million gallon reduction in third-party marketing volumes for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period
in 2017.
Selling, General
and Administrative Expenses
The following table presents
our selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, expenses in dollars and as a percentage of net sales (in thousands, except
percentages):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Variance
in
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Variance
in
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
8,898
|
|
|
$
|
8,762
|
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
18,213
|
|
|
$
|
14,212
|
|
|
$
|
4,001
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
%
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our SG&A expenses remained relatively
flat for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017.
Our SG&A expenses increased $4.0 million
to $18.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to $14.2 million for the same period in 2017. The increase
in SG&A expenses is primarily due to $3.6 million in one-time gains associated with legal matters resolved in the prior year
that reduced our SG&A expenses. In addition, our SG&A expenses for the 2018 periods include expenses related to the operation
of our ICP facility that were not present in the prior year periods as the acquisition had not yet occurred. We anticipate SG&A
expenses will total approximately $36.0 million for all of 2018.
Interest Expense
The following table presents
our interest expense in dollars and as a percentage of net sales (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Variance in
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Variance in
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
4,177
|
|
|
$
|
2,694
|
|
|
$
|
1,483
|
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,682
|
|
|
$
|
5,331
|
|
|
$
|
3,351
|
|
|
|
62.9
|
%
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense increased
$1.5 million to $4.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 from $2.7 million for the same period in 2017. Interest expense
increased $3.4 million to $8.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 from $5.3 million for the same period in 2017. The
increase in interest expense is primarily due to additional borrowings related to our acquisition of ICP and higher interest rates
on our senior notes, which increased in accordance with the note terms. In addition, we realized higher interest expense due to
accelerated amortization of deferred financing costs associated with our termination of Pacific Aurora’s line of credit.
Net Loss Available
to Common Stockholders
The following table presents
our net loss available to common stockholders in dollars and as a percentage of net sales (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Variance
in
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Variance
in
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(13,223
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,156
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,067
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
(21,376
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,104
|
)
|
|
$
|
(728
|
)
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in net loss
available to common stockholders is primarily due to lower margins and higher interest expense for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2018 as compared to the same periods in 2017.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During the six months ended June 30, 2018,
we funded our operations primarily from cash on hand, cash generated from our operations and advances from our revolving credit
facilities. These funds were also used to make capital expenditures, capital lease payments and principal payments on term debt.
Our current available capital resources
consist of cash on hand and amounts available for borrowing under our credit facilities. We expect that our future available capital
resources will consist primarily of our remaining cash balances, cash generated from our operations, and amounts available for
borrowing, if any, under our credit facilities.
We believe that current
and future available capital resources, including cash generated from our operations, and other existing sources of liquidity,
including our credit facilities, will be adequate to meet our anticipated capital requirements for at least the next twelve months.
Quantitative Quarter-End
Liquidity Status
We believe that the following
amounts provide insight into our liquidity and capital resources. The following selected financial information should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
report, and the other sections of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
contained in this report (dollars in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Change
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
62,581
|
|
|
$
|
49,489
|
|
|
26.5
|
%
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
220,705
|
|
|
$
|
203,246
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
495,274
|
|
|
$
|
508,352
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
99,642
|
|
|
$
|
90,706
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
$
|
237,771
|
|
|
$
|
221,091
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
121,063
|
|
|
$
|
112,540
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
Working capital ratio
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
Restricted Net Assets
At June 30, 2018, we had approximately $196.0
million of net assets at our subsidiaries that were not available to be transferred to Pacific Ethanol, Inc. in the form of dividends,
loans or advances due to restrictions contained in the credit facilities of our subsidiaries.
Changes in Working Capital and Cash
Flows
Working capital increased to $121.1 million
at June 30, 2018 from $112.5 million at December 31, 2017 as a result of an increase of $17.5 million in current assets, partially
offset by an increase of $8.9 million in current liabilities.
Current assets increased primarily due to
increases of $13.1 million in cash and cash equivalents, $6.6 million in derivative instruments, $5.8 million in inventories and
$1.3 million in other current assets, partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable of $7.8 million and $1.5 million in
other prepaid inventory. Our cash and cash equivalents increased by $13.1 million at June 30, 2018 as compared to December 31,
2017 due to $4.9 million of cash provided by our operations and $15.5 million of cash provided by our financing activities, partially
offset by $7.3 million of cash used in our investing activities.
Our current liabilities increased primarily
due to increases of $7.9 million in derivative instruments and $1.3 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
Cash provided by our Operating Activities
Cash provided by our operating activities
declined by $10.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the same period in 2018. We generated $4.9 million
in cash from our operating activities during the period. Specific factors that contributed to the decrease in cash provided by
our operating activities include:
|
●
|
a decrease related to accounts receivable of $32.1 million primarily due to the timing of collections; and
|
|
●
|
a decrease related to inventories of $2.5 million due to the timing of purchases.
|
These amounts were partially offset by:
|
●
|
an increase related to accounts payable and accrued expenses of $15.3 million due to the timing of payments and higher sales
volumes;
|
|
●
|
an increase related to prepaid expenses and other assets of $3.0 million;
|
|
●
|
an increase in depreciation expense of $2.0 million related to our ICP facilities; and
|
|
●
|
an increase related to higher losses on derivative instruments of $3.0 million.
|
Cash used in our Investing Activities
Cash used in our investing activities increased
by $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. The increase in cash used in our
investing activities is due to higher spending on capital projects associated with our plant improvement initiatives.
Cash provided by our Financing Activities
Cash provided by our financing activities
increased by $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. The increase in cash provided
by our financing activities is primarily due to $17.3 million in increased net borrowings under Kinergy’s line of credit,
partially offset by a decline of $13.5 million in note proceeds from the prior period and $2.0 million in increased principal payments
on our term debt.
Kinergy Operating Line of Credit
Kinergy maintains an operating line of credit
for an aggregate amount of up to $100.0 million. The credit facility matures on August 2, 2022. Interest accrues under the credit
facility at a rate equal to (i) the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), plus (ii) a specified applicable
margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.00%. The credit facility’s monthly unused line fee is 0.25% to 0.375% of the amount by which
the maximum credit under the facility exceeds the average daily principal balance during the immediately preceding month. Payments
that may be made by Kinergy to Pacific Ethanol as reimbursement for management and other services provided by Pacific Ethanol to
Kinergy are limited under the terms of the credit facility to $1.5 million per fiscal quarter. The credit facility also includes
the accounts receivable of Pacific Ag. Products, LLC, or PAP, as additional collateral. Payments that may be made by PAP to Pacific
Ethanol as reimbursement for management and other services provided by Pacific Ethanol to PAP are limited under the terms of the
credit facility to $0.5 million per fiscal quarter. PAP, one of our indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, markets our co-products
and also provides raw material procurement services to our subsidiaries.
For all monthly periods in which excess
borrowing availability falls below a specified level, Kinergy and PAP must collectively maintain a fixed-charge coverage ratio
(calculated as a twelve-month rolling earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) divided by the sum
of interest expense, capital expenditures, principal payments of indebtedness, indebtedness from capital leases and taxes paid
during such twelve-month rolling period) of at least 2.0 and are prohibited from incurring certain additional indebtedness (other
than specific intercompany indebtedness). Kinergy’s and PAP’s obligations under the credit facility are secured by
a first-priority security interest in all of their assets in favor of the lender. Kinergy and PAP believe they are in compliance
with this covenant. The following table summarizes Kinergy’s financial covenants and actual results for the periods presented
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three Months
Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Years
Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Charge Coverage Ratio Requirement
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
11.63
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
7.88
|
|
Excess (deficit)
|
|
|
9.63
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
For all periods presented above, Kinergy
maintained more than the minimum excess borrowing availability required; accordingly, the fixed-charge coverage ratio requirement
did not apply.
Pacific Ethanol has guaranteed all of Kinergy’s
obligations under the credit facility. As of June 30, 2018, Kinergy had an outstanding balance of $72.0 million with additional
borrowing availability under the credit facility of $2.6 million.
Pekin Credit Facilities
On December 15, 2016,
our wholly-owned subsidiary, Pacific Ethanol Pekin, LLC, or Pekin, entered into term and revolving credit facilities. Pekin borrowed
$64.0 million under a term loan facility that matures on August 20, 2021 and $32.0 million under a revolving credit facility that
matures on February 1, 2022. The Pekin credit facilities are secured by a first-priority security interest in all of Pekin’s
assets. Interest initially accrued under the Pekin credit facilities at an annual rate equal to the 30-day LIBOR plus 3.75%, payable
monthly. Pekin is required to make quarterly principal payments in the amount of $3.5 million on the term loan beginning on May
20, 2017, with the remaining principal balance payable at maturity on August 20, 2021. Pekin is required to pay monthly in arrears
a fee on any unused portion of the revolving credit facility at a rate of 0.75% per annum. Prepayment of these facilities is subject
to a prepayment penalty. Under the initial terms of the credit facilities, Pekin was required to maintain not less than $20.0 million
in working capital and an annual debt service coverage ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.0.
On August 7, 2017, Pekin
amended its term and revolving credit facilities by agreeing to increase the interest rate under the facilities by 25 basis points
to an annual rate equal to the 30-day LIBOR plus 4.00%. Pekin and its lender also agreed that Pekin is required to maintain working
capital of not less than $17.5 million from August 31, 2017 through December 31, 2017 and working capital of not less than $20.0
million from January 1, 2018 and continuing at all times thereafter. In addition, the required debt service coverage ratio was
reduced to 0.15 to 1.00 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. Pekin’s actual debt service coverage ratio was 0.17
to 1.00 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, 0.02 in excess of the required 0.15 to 1.00. For the month ended January 31,
2018, Pekin was not in compliance with its working capital requirement due to larger than anticipated repair and maintenance related
expenses to replace faulty equipment. Pekin has received a waiver from its lender for this noncompliance. Further, the lender decreased
Pekin’s working capital covenant requirement to $13.0 million for the month ended February 28, 2018, excluding from the calculation
a $3.5 million principal payment previously due in May 2018.
On March 30, 2018, Pekin
further amended its term loan facility by reducing the amount of working capital it is required to maintain to not less than $13.0
million from March 31, 2018 through November 30, 2018 and not less than $16.0 million from December 1, 2018 and continuing at all
times thereafter. In addition, a principal payment in the amount of $3.5 million due for May 2018 was deferred until the maturity
date of the term loan. As of the filing of this report, we believe Pekin is in compliance with its working capital requirement.
ICP Credit Facilities
On September 15, 2017, ICP entered into
term and revolving credit facilities. ICP borrowed $24.0 million under a term loan facility that matures on September 20, 2021
and $18.0 million under a revolving credit facility that matures on September 1, 2022. The ICP credit facilities are secured by
a first-priority security interest in all of ICP’s assets. Interest accrues under the ICP credit facilities at an annual
rate equal to the 30-day LIBOR plus 3.75%, payable monthly. ICP is required to make quarterly consecutive principal payments in
the amount of $1.5 million. ICP is required to pay monthly in arrears a fee on any unused portion of the revolving credit facility
at a rate of 0.75% per annum. Prepayment of these facilities is subject to a prepayment penalty. Under the terms of the credit
facilities, ICP is required to maintain not less than $8.0 million in working capital and an annual debt service coverage ratio
of not less than 1.5 to 1.0, beginning for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Pacific Ethanol, Inc. Notes Payable
On December 12, 2016, we entered into a
Note Purchase Agreement with five accredited investors. On December 15, 2016, under the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement, we
sold $55.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our senior secured notes to the investors in a private offering for aggregate
gross proceeds of 97% of the principal amount of the notes sold. On June 26, 2017, we entered into a second Note Purchase Agreement
with five accredited investors. On June 30, 2017, under the terms of the second Note Purchase Agreement, we sold an additional
$13.9 million in aggregate principal amount of our senior secured notes to the investors in a private offering for aggregate gross
proceeds of 97% of the principal amount of the notes sold, for a total of $68.9 million in aggregate principal amount of senior
secured notes.
The notes mature on December 15, 2019. Interest
on the notes accrues at an annual rate equal to (i) the greater of 1% and the three-month LIBOR, plus 7.0% from the closing through
December 14, 2017, (ii) the greater of 1% and three-month LIBOR, plus 9% between December 15, 2017 and December 14, 2018, and (iii)
the greater of 1% and three-month LIBOR plus 11% between December 15, 2018 and the maturity date. The interest rate increases by
an additional 2% per annum above the interest rate otherwise applicable upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event
of default until cured. Interest is payable in cash in arrears on the 15th calendar day of each March, June, September and December.
We are required to pay all outstanding principal and any accrued and unpaid interest on the notes on the maturity date. We may,
at our option, prepay the outstanding principal amount of the notes at any time without premium or penalty. Pacific Ethanol, Inc.
issued the notes, which are secured by a first-priority security interest in the equity interest held by Pacific Ethanol, Inc.
in its wholly-owned subsidiary, PE Op. Co., which indirectly owns our plants located on the West Coast.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes in the
six months ended June 30, 2018 to the amounts presented in the table under the “Contractual Obligations” section in
Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2017.
Effects of Inflation
The impact of inflation
was not significant to our financial condition or results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.