AITX Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc (PK)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K /A

Amendment No. 1

 

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2018

 

or

 

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from __________ to __________

 

Commission file number: 000-55079

 

ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada		27-2343603
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

 

1 East Liberty, 6th Floor Reno, NV 89501		89501
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (702) 990-3271

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

 

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

 

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, $0.001 par value		OTC QB

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

[  ] Yes    [X] No

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

[  ] Yes    [X] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[X] Yes    [  ] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

[X] Yes    [  ] No

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

[X]      

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,“and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

	Large accelerated filer	[  ]	Accelerated filer	[  ]
	Non-accelerated filer	[  ]	Smaller reporting company	[X]
			Emerging growth company	[  ]

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

[  ]       

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

[  ] Yes    [X] No

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of August 31, 2017 based upon the closing price reported on such date was approximately $17,439,944. Shares of voting stock held by each officer and director and by each person who, as of August 31, 2017, may be deemed as have beneficially owned more than 10% of the outstanding voting stock have been excluded. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination of affiliate status for any other purpose.

 

As of June 12, 2018, there were 165,340,897 shares of the registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

None.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

The purpose of this Amendment No. 1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 13, 2018 (“Form 10-K”) is to correct a typographical error in Part 1 of the Form 10-K and in the table in Note 15, and to reflect restatements to the Consolidated Statement of Stockholder’s Deficit for the period from Inception on July 26, 2016 through December 31, 2016 as well as to include the Audit Opinion of Malone Bailey, LLP for the period from Inception on July 26, 2016 through December 31, 2016, which was left off of the initial Form 10-K filing for the year ended February 28, 2018.

In addition we submit Exhibit 101 to the Form 10-K in accordance with Rule 405 of Regulation S-T. Exhibit 101 consists of the Interactive Data Files from the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2018, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 13, 2018 including the changes in this form 10-K/A.

Below is a summary of the changes:

1)  Page 2, paragraph 1, sentence 1: we changed the incorrect date of “April 2017” to the correct date of “April 2018.”

2)  Page F-3: we included the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Robotic Assistance Devices, LLC for the period from Inception on July 26, 2016 through December 31, 2016.

3)  Page F-6, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT: we reflected restatements for the period from Inception on July 26, 2016 through December 31, 2016.

4)  Corrected the total in the table in Note 15 from $334,837 to $336,837.

5)  The respective page numbers and indexes have been updated accordingly.

No other changes were made to this report.

---

Table of Contents

 

		Page
PART I
Item 1 .	Business	1
Item 1A .	Risk Factors	7
Item 1B .	Unresolved Staff Comments	13
Item 2 .	Properties	13
Item 3 .	Legal Proceedings	13
Item 4 .	Mine Safety Disclosures	14
PART II
Item 5 .	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	14
Item 6 .	Selected Financial Data	17
Item 7 .	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
Item 7A .	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	23
Item 8 .	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	23
Item 9 .	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures	23
Item 9A .	Controls and Procedures	24
Item 9B .	Other Information	25
PART III
Item 10 .	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	26
Item 11 .	Executive Compensation	27
Item 12 .	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	28
Item 13 .	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	29
Item 14 .	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	29
PART IV
Item 15 .	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	30
	Signatures	32

---

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

 

Certain statements in this report contain or may contain forward-looking statements. These statements, identified by words such as “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “should”, “expect” and similar expressions include our expectations and objectives regarding our future financial position, operating results and business strategy. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements were based on various factors and were derived utilizing numerous assumptions and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, our ability to secure suitable financing to continue with our existing business or change our business and conclude a merger, acquisition or combination with a business prospect, economic, political and market conditions and fluctuations, government and industry regulation, interest rate risk, U.S. and global competition, and other factors. Most of these factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond our control. You should consider the areas of risk described in connection with any forward-looking statements that may be made herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Readers should carefully review this report in its entirety, including but not limited to our financial statements and the notes thereto and the risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2018. We advise you to carefully review the reports and documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), particularly our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our current reports on Form 8-K. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the Federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events.

---

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Business Overview

On the Move Systems Corp. (“OMVS”) was incorporated in Florida on March 25, 2010. OMVS reincorporated into Nevada on February 17, 2015. OMVS’s fiscal year end is February 28. OMVS is located at 701 North Green Valley Parkway, Suite 200, Henderson, Nevada 89074, and the telephone number is 702-990-3271.

OMVS’s prior business focus was transportation services, and we were previously exploring the on-demand logistics market by seeking to develop a network of logistics partnerships. On August 28, 2017, OMVS acquired all of the outstanding shares of Robotic Assistance Devices, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “RAD” or the “Company”). Following the RAD acquisition, our business consists of delivering artificial intelligence (“AI”) based solutions to solve complex enterprise problems and challenges while delivering an immediate return on investment. Our initial goal is to disrupt and capture a significant portion of the $30+ billion human security guard market(1) and the $20+ billion physical security market (cctv, access control, intercom) and become a key driver in the $1+ billion managed security services market(2) through its innovative RAD Software Suite and manufactured solutions which combine the most desired features of both industries in a compact, cloud based mobile environment.

__________

(1)  https://www.statista.com/statistics/294206/revenue-of-security-services-in-the-us/

(2)  https://www.securitymagazine.com/articles/80145-managed-wireless-security-services-market-to-top-1-billion-in-2014-1

Recent Developments

On August 28, 2017, OMVS entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) with RAD and Steve Reinharz, as sole stockholder of RAD. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, on August 28, 2017, OMVS acquired 10,000 shares of RAD’s common stock, representing all of RAD’s issued and outstanding capital stock, from Mr. Reinharz in exchange for the issuance of (i) 3,350,000 shares of its Series E Preferred Stock and (ii) 2,450 shares of its Series F Convertible Preferred Stock. As a result of the RAD acquisition, RAD became a wholly owned subsidiary of OMVS.  RAD was considered the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes.

Business

Our business consists of seeking to deliver AI based solutions to solve complex enterprise problems and challenges while delivering an immediate return on investment. We have initially targeted the security industry, which utilizes electronic systems and further involves approximately 1.1 million security guards in the U.S. alone.  We plan to provide our AI robotic solutions to companies and governments so that they can employ such solutions for the purposes of protecting their assets, whether those assets are government, commercial or industrial. We believe that our security guard solutions combine both robotic and AI solutions to provide a superior solution to our clients which can save them money on their security needs.

RAD was incorporated as a limited liability corporation under the laws of the State of Wyoming in July 2016 and later reincorporated (as a C corp.) in the State of Nevada in July 2017. RAD’s mission is to deliver artificial intelligence solutions to solve complex and expensive enterprise organizational challenges. We believe that RAD’s robotic solutions can improve the security services of any enterprise due to advanced technology that is always on, compared to human guarding where it is difficult to maintain non-stop attention in mundane or dangerous guarding roles.

Founded by Mr. Steve Reinharz in the summer of 2016, RAD originally partnered with SMP Robotics Systems Corp (SMP) to commercialize the SMP S5 Robot for the security industry. RAD’s commercialization of the platform focused on integrating traditional security industry manufacturers’ solutions onto the robotics platform. After two paid proof of concepts for large utility companies (under an NDA) and over 18 months of development and testing, RAD began deployments with various Fortune 500 customers. These deployments were scheduled to begin in October 2017, but were delayed until December 2017 due to various supply chain challenges.

- 1 -

---

By April 2018 it was apparent that the S5 platform promotion and development was not sustainable and RAD pulled its robots from service.  With over 40 attempted deployments, it appeared that the S5 Robots were being rejected by customers due to their unreliability and certain technical flaws which could not be solved despite full efforts by both SMP and RAD. SMP has shared that they expect to solve these technical issues with an updated version to their S5 Robot but no firm date of the release has been provided. As a result, RAD has shifted its solutions to its Security Control and Observation Tower (“SCOT™”), its RAD Software Suite and future solutions 100% developed and owned by RAD. It is possible moving forward that RAD will cease to be an SMP dealer, however it expects no impact on its’ business if the SMP relationship ends. RAD calls its current lineup of solutions the ’2 ^nd Generation of electronic guarding solutions.’

RAD’s primary strategy has always been to use AI technology and modern systems to transform the security industry. Mobile robots, indoor and outdoor, are a part of that strategy. RAD will continue to pursue such avenues but sees SCOT™ and its forthcoming derivatives as its primary source of revenue for the remainder of 2018.

The development of SCOT™ began in August 2017. SCOT™ performs many of the same functions of a stationary human security guard, plus many features that human guards cannot perform, at approximately 15% of the cost. We are unaware of any comparable solution available today that blends technology, usability, special features and cost. This is why SCOT™ has seen growing demand and has received considerable accolades. As a result, the Company has accelerated SCOT™’s development and the RAD Software Suite.

SCOT™ runs on the RAD Software Suite, as all current and future RAD security solutions will. This software suite is a cloud and mobile based solution that is at the heart of RAD’s security solution.

The beta release of SCOT™ took place in Ohio at the end of February 2018. Security representatives from Cincinnati Reds, Bengals, Cincinnati Police Department and the County of Hamilton Sheriff’s Department were present and gave SCOT™ and the preliminary RAD Software Suite a tremendous endorsement. SCOT™ was officially launched on April 2, 2018, a week before the ISC West show, the largest security show in the U.S.  SCOT™’s first three deployments were made on April 9 to two clients. Both clients have since requested additional SCOT™ units for their facilities.

At the ISC West show in April 2018, SCOT™ won three awards: (1) a SIA New Product Award for Law Enforcement/Guarding, (2) 2018 Secure Campus Award from Campus Security and Life Safety and (3) a ‘Govie’ award for government security solutions from Security Today. We were notified we won a ‘money saving’ award from an additional, non-industry organization which was made public in June 2018.

The Security Industry Association’s (SIA) New Product Showcase recognizes innovative products, services and solutions in electronic physical security, and SCOT™’s award comes in the Law Enforcement/Guarding Systems category. Technologies within the program are used in the protection of life and property in residential, commercial and institutional settings, displaying SCOT™’s importance in long-range human detection and acting as a force multiplier for safety and defense against outside threats.

RAD’s business shift to SCOT™ and its future derivatives is complete and current facilities can produce up to 100 units per month with moderate additional investment in equipment, space and manpower.  The SCOT™s are primarily furnished to customers using a Solutions-as-a-Service (“SaaS”) recurring revenue model.

The Company’s mission is to improve customer security services of all types of enterprises while providing significant operating cost reduction through deployment of AI based solutions and systems. We believe that RAD’s solutions can improve an enterprise security services due to advanced technology that is always on, compared to human guarding where it is difficult to maintain non-stop attention in mundane guarding roles. The security guard industry suffers from low client satisfaction, high turnover and can be a source of new liabilities for clients. Security guards often just ‘punch the clock’ and sometimes perform functions that are little more than ‘being there’.

Our belief that RAD Solutions are positioned to provide improved performance and lower costs to create a major disruption to the security industry are well substantiated by the interest and partnerships from major US corporations including Allied Universal Services. Discussions with the top 5 US guarding companies further substantiates that new electronic solutions must be adopted to improve customer service, to meet growing demand, to allow flexibility in meeting new government employment requirements, to respond to customer requests for lower costs, and to provide modern solutions and enhanced performance.

- 2 -

---

SCOT™

The SCOT™ is a standalone remote, portable, self-sufficient security observation tower designed to expand an organization’s security reach instantly. RAD’s unique power system allows SCOT™ to be quickly placed virtually anywhere for short- or long-term deployments with zero investment/planning in any supporting infrastructure.

Its use of AI based technology allows it to deliver guarding services at a fraction of the cost and it is considerably more affordable than any human or automated solution on the market.

SCOT™ is equipped with AI that powers human detection analytics, featuring the longest-range detection at low false alarm rates. In addition, SCOT™ debuts the RAD Software Suite, which is a collection of integrated software applications hosted in Microsoft’s Azure Cloud services and allows immediate and mobile access to alerts and controls generated by SCOT™. Each tower is equipped with the latest artificial intelligence technologies:

▪	Human detection analytics – SuspectSpotter
▪	License plate recognition – LicenseSpoter
▪	Standalone power – RAD Power Systems
▪	MAC Tracker™ capabilities – through BOLO Technologies
▪	Long-range paging
▪	Close-range video intercom
▪	Customizable wraparound LED panels
▪	Long-range high deterrence visibility
▪	Cellular connectivity and WiFi standard
▪	Credential validation and access control (optional)
▪	24/7 equipment monitoring from RAD through the Robot Monitoring Center
▪	24/7 security functions monitoring by 3 rd parties or by the end users (or any combination thereof)
▪	Security/Help/Panic button
▪	Large Tablet featuring security and concierge services PLUS video conferencing with the SOC or guards in the field
▪	Over-the-air software updates
▪	Digital signage for concierge services or emergency/security messaging
▪	Cloud processing
▪	Various physical and anti-tamper security features
▪	Self-powering option for up to 10 days

RAD has completed development of two iterations of the SCOT™:

▪	Wally™ is a wall-mounted version of SCOT. It features a single camera and speaker (versus 4 for SCOT™) and was created from feedback by SCOT™’s Ohio presentations. Wally™ is designed to perform lobby guard activities as well as be mounted inside parking structures and block walls. Wally™ is indoor/outdoor rated and, like SCOT™, is IP65 rated and can operate up to 8 days on battery power. Wally™ uses the RAD Software Suite while connecting to the third-party monitoring of the customer’s choice. Instead of SCOT™’s LED digital signage, Wally™ uses a 10” HD screen that can display digital signage and full video as desired by the end user. Wally™ integrates with RAD’s Visitor Management system and Facial Recognition system just as SCOT™ does. Wally™’s official introduction will be in June, 2018.
▪	Facial Recognition Entry Device (“FRED”) is an add-on to the RAD Software Suite that uses facial recognition to grant access through gates and doors. This was specifically requested by several customers and prospects. FRED is designed to perform facial recognition for outdoor gate applications, main entry applications and general high security applications. FRED is a purpose-built RAD Software Suite device meaning that it does not run the entire Software Suite. FRED focuses on Visitor enrollment and entry, employee entry, help and information.

The RAD Software Suite

RAD’s Software Suite encompasses a suite of software applications that replace functionality for the most used security legacy hardware and software. Implemented in RAD’s hardware solutions, the RAD Software Suite delivers security services plus concierge, marketing and data collection services.

- 3 -

---

Introduced on April 2, 2018, the software suite is based on the following principles:

▪	Legacy security technology such as video management systems do not take full advantage of modern technology because their pricing model restricts implementing new technologies, specifically cloud-based recording and serving of video equipment. RAD’s software can be taught to an operator in less than 15 minutes, significantly less time than many other legacy solutions. This is due to a complete ground-up software design that did not need legacy connections plus the application of security industry specific experience.
▪	Modern cloud focused software design can be applied to provide dramatic functional improvement to electronic security systems. Specifically, AI based human detection, facial recognition and pattern behavior. Using AI based solutions is essential given its reliability, accuracy and low cost.
▪	The Security Operations Center that has been an industry stalwart can be augmented and/or replaced by better systems at a fraction of the cost.
▪	Intelligent solutions such as those offered by RAD collect and provide useable data, in real time, to clients. This is in contrast to many traditional industry solutions that typically offer forensic features and benefits.

The RAD Software Suite is 100% designed, developed and owned by RAD. RAD’s primary software solution includes but is not limited to the following:

▪	RADGuard™: This is the primary software that provides visitor and/or customer with links to Help, Entry functions and other customized features requested by the customer.
▪	RADSoC™: Cloud-served complete Security Operations Center Communications software application that allows monitoring at the Security Operating Center (SOC) to see and communicate with SCOT
▪	RAD Mobile Control™: This software platform allows end users to access and monitor SCOT™ features from any portable device
▪	Where’s My SCOT™: For placing and tracking SCOT™ from order, through production to delivery status. It is also a tool to use for planning SCOT™ placements.

RAD’s ’Where’s My SCOT™’ was custom developed so that RAD dealers and end users can have access so that new rental orders can be entered via self-serve.

Sales & Marketing Strategy

RAD solutions’ primary use cases include the following:

▪	Critical infrastructure - Boosting the protection of any critical infrastructure site where the end user needs more control over an expansive area. Example applications: Vehicle/manned gates, perimeters, difficult-to-staff locations
▪	Home Owner’s Associations - Providing an inexpensive way to bolster security without breaking the bank, providing eyes and ears to the entrance of a neighborhood without the infrastructure or investment of a human guard.
▪	Recreational & shopping facilities - RAD’s technological capabilities and customizable alerts make it the perfect security solution for high-trafficked recreational facilities such as sports arenas or malls. Example applications: parking areas, entrance areas
▪	Corporate Campuses - Security and credential validation capabilities make RAD ’ s solutions the perfect security solution for employee and visitor access control. Example applications: parking areas, entrance areas
▪	Distribution Centers - SCOT ™  can work for vehicle, visitor and employee entrances, as well as interior/perimeter areas.

RAD will primarily use its guarding dealer channel to deliver solutions to the market. Guarding companies are cognizant of the fact that failure to adopt new technology will severely impact their business in the future. The guarding partnership model is valuable as it provides RAD with instant access to the largest consumers of guarding services, the Company’s primary target market.  RAD’s dealer network currently totals over 800 reps.

- 4 -

---

Solutions-As-A-Service Rental Program

RAD is focused on providing cost-effective, customized options to help organizations achieve their operational and security goals.

Our “ Solutions-as-a-Service ” program includes:

▪	Comprehensive training for operators and staff that may interact with SCOT ™ through a combination of online and in-person certification programs.
▪	Multiple options for customer training with a focus on positive end user solution adoption.
▪	In-person SOP integration for SCOT ™ and robot protocols.
▪	RAD offers complete maintenance and service through the life of the contract. 24/7 technical service support is available online or through RAD sales contacts. RAD’s goal is easy integration of its security solutions that keep an enterprises security team functioning 100% of the time.

“Solutions-as-a-Service” terms are from 12 months to 48 months, with incentives for longer term rental commitments. Available channels include:

▪	Direct to end user: RAD manages all aspects of deployment.
▪	Guarding Company Dealer: RAD works with a number of excellent guarding companies that can help ensure its security solutions augment an enterprise ’ s guarding force.
▪	Integrator Dealer: RAD solutions are currently offered to the integrator channel through a partnership with PSA Network.  Sales networks: Sales organizations that carry a wide range of solutions through independent sales representatives.

RAD’s software is provided free to customers with a RAD hardware solution. RAD’s software strategy is to create as many connections as possible, at low cost, so that the RAD Software Suite becomes the dominant control system for security and other systems.

Artificial Intelligence: Object Recognition

RAD’s neural network can be customized to a variety of customer needs and utilizes best-in-breed AI algorithms from a variety of vendors. RAD’s use of base level algorithms allows for easy integration of different features for different uses and ensures that RAD is never reliant on any one vendor. RAD maintains complete control over its Software Suit and the ability to enhance its features and options.

Competition and Competitive Strengths

We are unaware of any comparable solution available today that blends technology, usability, special features and cost while focusing on partnering with industry and law enforcement to effect realistic improvements to security while providing a return on investment.

As the robotics industry continues to grow one can expect a number of new ventures, start-ups, and university research programs to develop products that could compete with the Company. Some outside of the security industry believe security robots, stand alone or mobile, compete against closed-circuit television providers, but cameras do not provide a physical presence, are typically used for forensics after an event, and do not offer a client the plethora of capabilities available in the RAD Software Suit/SCOT ™ /SOC combination. The Company believes that having these systems working together provides a more effective approach.

The Company also competes indirectly with private physical security firms that provide clients with security personnel and other security services. There are more than 8,000 such firms in the U.S. alone. The Company’s SCOT ™ offers clients a significant cost reduction compared to traditional security guards. In addition, the Company ’ s SCOT ™ offers significantly more capabilities, such as license plate detection, data gathering, and people detection that are delivered consistently, on a 24/7 basis, without human intervention. In most cases, the Company ’ s technology complements and improves the operations of traditional security firms.

- 5 -

---

Manufacturing

RAD manufactures and assembles its SCOT ™ in the U.S. The Company has developed a local ecosystem of suppliers with multiple vendors for each category of material, however some items are only available overseas, specifically the tablets and some battery technology. Other items that are purchased in the U.S. have substantial portions built overseas, including, for example, the cameras and speakers. RAD is committed to North American sourcing and manufacturing.

RAD has begun development for manufacturing plans in Michigan, which will allow flexibility for high volume production.

Research and Development

RAD is continuously engaged in research and development. Its family of products is continuously evolving. The first production run, SCOT ™ version 1.0, and its subsequent deployments, has resulted in SCOT ™ version 1.2. This latest version of SCOT ™ includes significant improvements to power, processing and other physical enhancements. RAD is continuously working towards improving the design and construction of its SCOT ™ ’ s and is working to be GDPR compliant by the end of RAD ’ s second fiscal quarter.  In addition, RAD is pursuing additional cost savings optimized for mass production.

Intellectual Property Protection

There are no patents filed as of the date of this report. RAD plans to file various applications for protection of certain aspects of its intellectual property in the United States.

Government Approvals

The Company is not aware of any government approvals applicable to its business and further is not aware of any pending or threatened investigation, proceeding or action by foreign, federal, state or local agencies, or third parties involving its current operations.

Environmental Matters

The Company is not aware of any environmental regulations applicable to its business and further is not aware of any pending or threatened environmental investigation, proceeding or action by foreign, federal, state or local agencies, or third parties involving its current operations.

Description of the Industry

The Security Guard Industry

We believe that the outlook for the private security services industry in the U.S. and abroad continues to be upbeat. Worldwide annual spending on private contract security services was estimated at $244 billion for 2016, with the U.S. being the biggest consumer, accounting for 26% or $63.4 billion(1). Security guard services are expected to attract the largest share of overall U.S. security spending through 2019 with security guard and patrol services estimated at $19.4 billion in 2016(1). According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are currently over 1 million security guards employed in the U.S. generating $31.2 billion per year in wages.

__________

(1)  Summit Security report www.summitsecurity.com/looking-forward-security-industry-trends-and-outlook-for-2016-and-beyond/ .

According to The Freedonia Group, U.S. demand for private contracted security services is expected to rise 4.2% annually through 2019 to $66.9 billion. Systems integration and security consulting is expected to be the fastest growing services, while guarding and alarm monitoring is expected to remain dominant. The non-residential market is expected to remain the largest segment, while the institutional market grows the fastest.

- 6 -

---

The Robotics Industry

International Data Corporation (“IDC”) has identified robotics as one of six Innovation Accelerators that will drive digital transformation by opening new revenue streams and changing the way work is performed. In the new Worldwide Commercial Robotics Spending Guide, IDC forecasts global spending on robotics and related services to grow at a Compounded Annual Growth Rate (“CAGR”) of 17% from more than $71 billion in 2015 to $135.4 billion in 2019. Such broad-based growth in robotic adoption is being driven by increasing labor costs, shortage of skilled labor, and an increasing emphasis on repeatable quality in conjunction with a reduction in prices of robotic systems and strategic national initiatives. There were over 41,000 professional service robots sold in 2015 valued at $4.6 billion, up 25% from the year before.

The service robotics market is expected to reach $23.9 billion by 2022, growing at a CAGR of 15.2% between 2016 and 2022 with professional service robots holding the largest market share of the service robotics market in 2015. Professional service robotics is currently the most widely developed and deployed application area of service robots in terms of market value. The market is expected to be driven by the increase in demand for logistics applications. However, other emerging professional applications such as telepresence and inspection and maintenance are expected to fuel the overall service robotics market during the forecast period. The security robots market is expected to reach $2.4 billion by 2022, at a CAGR of 8.6% between 2016 and 2022 with North America expected to hold the largest share during this period.

Employees

As of June 11 2018, we had 15 full-time employees and 21 contracted employees. None of our employees are represented by a union. We consider our relations with our employees to be excellent.

Legal Proceedings

See Item 3—Legal Proceedings.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES DESCRIBED BELOW AND THE OTHER INFORMATION CONTAINED OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THIS TRANSITIONAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K BEFORE DECIDING WHETHER TO INVEST IN THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK. ADDITIONAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES NOT PRESENTLY KNOWN TO THE REGISTRANT OR THAT THE REGISTRANT CURRENTLY DEEMS IMMATERIAL MAY ALSO IMPAIR THE REGISTRANT’S BUSINESS OPERATIONS.

IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING RISKS ACTUALLY OCCUR, THE REGISTRANT’S BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION OR OPERATING RESULTS COULD BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED. IN SUCH CASE, THE TRADING PRICE OR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK COULD DECLINE AND YOU MAY LOSE PART OR ALL OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

THE FOLLOWING ALSO CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. PLEASE SEE “CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS”.

Risks Related to Our Industry and Our Company

Our business is at an early stage and we have not yet generated any profits or significant revenues.

RAD was formed in 2016 and made its first sale in 2016. Accordingly, the Company has a limited operating history upon which to evaluate its performance and future prospects. Our current and proposed operations are subject to all the business risks associated with new enterprises. These include likely fluctuations in operating results as the Company makes significant investments in research, development and product opportunities, and reacts to developments in its market, including purchasing patterns of customers, and the entry of competitors into the market. We cannot assure you that we will generate sufficient revenue to be profitable in the next three years or at all, which could lead to a loss of part or all of an investment in the Company.

- 7 -

---

We have a limited number of deployments and our success depends on an unproven market.

The market for advanced physical security technology is relatively new and unproven and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. In order to grow our business and extend our market position, we will need to place into service additional robots, expand our service offerings, and expand our presence. Our ability to expand the market for our products depends on a number of factors, including the cost, performance and perceived value associated with our products and services. Furthermore, the public’s perception of the use of robots to perform tasks traditionally reserved for humans may negatively affect demand for our products and services. Ultimately, our success will depend largely on our customers’ acceptance that security services can be performed more efficiently and cost effectively through the use of our robots and ancillary services, of which there can be no assurance.

We cannot assure you that we can effectively manage our growth.

RAD expects to continue hiring additional employees. The growth and expansion of our business and products create significant challenges for our management, operational, and financial resources, including managing multiple relationships and interactions with users, distributors, vendors, and other third parties. As the Company continues to grow, our information technology systems, internal management processes, internal controls and procedures and production processes may not be adequate to support our operations. To ensure success, we must continue to improve our operational, financial, and management processes and systems and to effectively expand, train, and manage our employee base. As we continue to grow, and implement more complex organizational and management structures, we may find it increasingly difficult to maintain the benefits of our corporate culture, including our current team’s efficiency and expertise, which could negatively affect our business performance.

Our costs may grow more quickly than our revenues, harming our business and profitability.

We expect our expenses to continue to increase in the future as we expand our product offerings, expand production capabilities and hire additional employees. We expect to continue to incur increasing costs, in particular for working capital to purchase inventory, marketing and product deployments as well as costs associated with customer support in the field. Our expenses may be greater than we anticipate which would have a negative impact on our financial position, assets and ability to invest further in the growth and expansion of our business.

The loss of one or more of our key personnel, or our failure to attract and retain other highly qualified personnel in the future, could harm our business.

RAD currently depends on the continued services and performance of key members of the management team, in particular, founder and CEO, Steven Reinharz, and Chief Technology Officer, Aziz Sekander. If we cannot call upon them or other key management personnel for any reason, our operations and development could be harmed. The Company has not yet developed a succession plan. Furthermore, as the Company grows, it will be required to hire and attract additional qualified professionals such as accounting, legal, finance, production, service and engineering experts. The Company may not be able to locate or attract qualified individuals for such positions, which will affect the Company’s ability to grow and expand its business.

We have no employment agreements in place with our executive officers or directors.

We currently do not have any employment agreements in place with our only executive officer and director. Since the Company has no such agreements currently in place, there is a risk that our only executive officer and director may terminate their association with the Company.  The loss of our only executive officer and director would have a material and adverse effect on our Company and our business prospects.   Further, in the future, the Company may attract additional persons to serve as its executive officers and directors and may negotiate and consummate employment agreements with its executive officers and directors and such agreements may contain issuance of the Company’s securities as part of the compensation, which would lead our shareholders to experience dilution.

Because we do not currently have an audit committee, compensation committee or any other form of corporate governance committee, shareholders will have to rely on our only director, who is not independent, to perform these functions.

We do not have an audit committee, compensation committee or any form of corporate governance committees comprised of an independent director. The Board, which currently consists of our only director, performs these functions as a whole and the only member of the Board is not an independent director.

- 8 -

---

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be diminished and our business may be adversely affected.

RAD relies and expects to continue to rely on a combination of confidentiality agreements with its employees, consultants, and third parties with whom it has relationships, as well as trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret, and domain name protection laws, to protect its proprietary rights. As of the date of this report, there are no patents filed on behalf of the Company.  The Company plans to file various applications in the United States for protection of certain aspects of its intellectual property. However, third parties may knowingly or unknowingly infringe our proprietary rights, may challenge proprietary rights held by us and pending and future trademark and patent applications may not be approved. In addition, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which we intend to operate in the future. In any or all of these cases, we may be required to expend significant time and expense in order to prevent infringement or to enforce our rights. Although we plan to take measures to protect our proprietary rights, there can be no assurance that others will not offer products or concepts that are substantially similar to those of RAD and compete with our business. If the protection of our proprietary rights is inadequate to prevent unauthorized use or appropriation by third parties, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be diminished and competitors may be able to more effectively mimic our service and methods of operations. Any of these events could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results.

Our financial results will fluctuate in the future, which makes them difficult to predict.

RAD’s financial results may fluctuate in the future. Additionally, we have a limited operating history with the current scale of our business, which makes it difficult to forecast future results. As a result, you should not rely upon the Company’s past financial results as indicators of future performance. You should take into account the risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by rapidly growing companies in evolving markets. Our financial results in any given quarter can be influenced by numerous factors, many of which we are unable to predict or are outside of our control, including, but not limited to the following:

▪	Our ability to maintain and grow our client base;
▪	Our clients may suffer downturns, financial instability or be subject to mergers or acquisitions;
▪	The development and introduction of new products by RAD or our competitors;
▪	Increases in marketing, sales, service and other operating expenses that we may incur to grow and expand our operations and to remain competitive;
▪	RAD ability to maintain gross margins and operating margins;
▪	Changes affecting our suppliers and other third-party service providers;
▪	Adverse litigation judgments, settlements, or other litigation-related costs; and
▪	Changes in business or macroeconomic conditions including regulatory changes.

Our business is subject to data security risks, including security breaches.

Our products employ technologies which are subject to various data security risks including security breaches and hacking and we cannot guarantee that our products may not be negatively affected by these risks causing them to suffer damages.  Any occurrence of the foregoing may damage our brand and increase our costs. Any of these events or circumstances could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Economic factors generally may negatively affect our operations.

The Company is subject to the general risks of the marketplace in which the Company does business. Moreover, the results of operations of the Company will depend on a number of factors over which the Company will have no control, including changes in general economic or local economic conditions, changes in supply of or demand for similar and/or competing products and services, and changes in tax and governmental regulations that may affect demand for such products and services. Any significant decline in general economic conditions or uncertainties regarding future economic prospects that affect industrial and consumer spending could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. For these and other reasons, no assurance of profitable operations can be given.

- 9 -

---

Our business success depends on large part on the success of our efforts to rent our products through dealerships.

The Company plans to primarily look to rent its robots through dealerships with guarding companies. The Company believes that the guarding partnership model is valuable. The Company currently has such partnerships with 5 dealers and plans to sign on additional dealers. However, there can be no assurance that the Company can successfully secure agreements with dealerships for the use of our products, which could materially impair our sales and our business prospects.

We may not be able to develop automatic charging four our products, which could negatively affect our growth strategy.

Part of the Company’s growth strategy is to implement automatic charging for our products. The Company plans to implement autonomous charging capabilities for its products as part of its long-term efforts. The Company believes that adding this feature would allow companies to add security to areas that are either not suitable for humans or cost effective for permanent security and thus expanding the market for our products. If the Company cannot implement automatic charging for its products it would impact the size of the market for its products and could negatively affect its growth strategy.

We currently face some competition and may face additional competition in the future and if we are not able to compete effectively, our business prospects and operations would be harmed.

We are aware of a number of other companies that are already active in our industry and others that are developing physical security technology in the U.S. and abroad that may potentially compete with our technology and services. These, or new, competitors may have more resources than us or may be better capitalized, which may give them a significant advantage, for example, in offering better pricing than the Company, surviving an economic downturn or in reaching profitability. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to compete successfully against existing or emerging competitors. Additionally, existing private security firms may also compete on price by lowering their operating costs, developing new business models or providing other incentives.  We cannot give any assurance that we can adequately compete with existing or new competitors which could lead us to expend additional funds toward our marketing efforts and would further adversely affect our business operations.

Our ability to operate and collect digital information on behalf of our clients is dependent on the privacy laws of jurisdictions in which our machines operate, as well as the corporate policies of our clients, which may limit our ability to fully deploy our technologies in various markets.

Our robots collect, store and analyze certain types of personal or identifying information regarding individuals that interact with the machines. While we maintain stringent data security procedures, the regulatory framework for privacy and security issues is rapidly evolving worldwide and is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. Federal and state government bodies and agencies have in the past adopted, and may in the future adopt, laws and regulations affecting data privacy, which in turn affect the breadth and type of features that we can offer to our clients. In addition, our clients have separate internal policies, procedures and controls regarding privacy and data security with which we may be required to comply. Because the interpretation and application of many privacy and data protection laws are uncertain, it is possible that these laws may be interpreted or applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our current data management practices or the features of our products. If so, in addition to the possibility of fines, lawsuits and other claims and penalties, we could be required to fundamentally change our business activities and practices or modify our products, which could have an adverse effect on our business. Any inability to adequately address privacy and security concerns, even if unfounded, or comply with applicable privacy and data security laws, regulations, and policies, could result in additional cost and liability to us, damage our reputation, inhibit sales, and adversely affect our business. Furthermore, the costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, the laws, regulations, and policies that are applicable to the businesses of our clients may limit the use and adoption of, and reduce the overall demand for, our products. Privacy and data security concerns, whether valid or not valid, may inhibit market adoption of our products, particularly in certain industries and foreign countries. If we are not able to adjust to changing laws, regulations, our business may be harmed.

Our success depends on the growth of our industry and specifically on the growing adoption and use of physical security technology in general and of our products.

The market for products and for physical security technology is relatively unproven and new, as well as being subject to many risks and uncertainties. Our ability to gain growing market acceptance and adoption of our products, depends on the market’s acceptance of physical security technology in general.  If we are unable to increase acceptance of our products and if the market for physical security technology generally does not develop we will not be able to sell our products and our financial performance will be adversely affected.

- 10 -

---

Our shareholders do not have voting control over the Company due to the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of its Series E Preferred Stock.

Mr. Parsons, the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer currently owns 1,000,000 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock and; Steve Reinharz is the CEO of RAD, and is currently the holder of 3,350,000 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock.  The outstanding shares of Series E Preferred Stock have the right to take action by written consent or vote based on the number of votes equal to twice the number of votes of all outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, the holders of Series E Preferred Stock have 2/3rds of the voting power of all shareholders at any time corporate action requires a vote of shareholders, and therefore our other shareholders do not have voting control over the Company.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

The Company’s continued operations may be dependent on the Company raising additional capital.

To the extent that the cash flow from operations are insufficient to fund the Company’s operations, we will be required to raise additional capital through equity or debt financing. Any additional equity financing may be dilutive to shareholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve significant restrictive covenants. The Company’s failure or inability to raise capital when needed, or on terms acceptable to the Company and our shareholders, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that such financing will be available on terms satisfactory to the Company, if at all.  If we are unable to obtain such financing when needed, in addition to having an adverse effect on our business operations, it would also have a negative adverse effect on the price of our Common Stock.  

The Company may conduct further offerings in the future, in which case your shareholdings will be diluted.

The Company may rely on equity sales of common stock to fund operations. The Company may conduct further equity and/or convertible debt offerings in the future to finance operations or other projects that it decides to undertake. If common stock is issued in return for additional funds, or upon conversion or exercise of outstanding convertible debentures or warrants, the price per share could be lower than that paid by existing common stockholders. The Company anticipates continuing to rely on equity sales of common stock and issuances of convertible debt and/or warrants convertible or exercisable into shares of common stock in order to fund its business operations. If the Company issues additional shares of common stock, your percentage interest in the Company will be lower. This is often referred to as “dilution,” which could result in a reduction in the per share value of your shares of common stock.

The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.

Volatility in the trading price of our common stock may prevent our shareholders from being able to sell their shares of our common stock at prices equal to or greater than their purchase price. The trading price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly for various reasons, including:

▪	our operating and financial performance and prospects;
▪	our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in our industry;
▪	the public ’ s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission;
▪	changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by research analysts who track our common stock or the stock of other companies in our industry;
▪	strategic actions by us or our competitors;
▪	new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business;
▪	changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;
▪	changes in general economic conditions in the U.S. and global economies or financial markets, including such changes resulting from war or incidents of terrorism; and
▪	sales of our common stock by us or members of our management team.

- 11 -

---

In addition, in recent years, the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant impact on the trading price of securities issued by many companies. The changes frequently occur irrespective of the operating performance of the affected companies. Hence, the trading price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors that have little or nothing to do with our business.

The Company does not anticipate paying dividends in the future.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. Our current policy is to retain earnings to reinvest in our business. Therefore, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The Company’s dividend policy will be reviewed from time to time by the Board of Directors in the context of its earnings, financial condition and other relevant factors. Until the Company pays dividends, which it may never do, its shareholders will not be able to receive a return on shares of our common stock unless they are able to sell them, of which there can be no assurance. In addition, there is no guarantee that our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which stockholders have purchased their shares or that our stockholders will be able to sell their shares of our common stock at all.

Our shares are subject to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “penny stock” rules that limit trading activity in the market, which may make it more difficult for our shareholders to sell their common stock.

Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00. Since our common stock is trading at less than $5.00 per share, we are subject to the penny stock rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission that require broker-dealers to deliver extensive disclosure to its customers prior to executing trades in penny stocks not otherwise exempt from the rules. The broker-dealer must also provide its customers with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held by the customer. Under the penny stock regulations, a broker-dealer selling a penny stock to anyone other than an established customer or accredited investor must make a special suitability determination regarding the purchaser and must receive the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the sale, unless the broker-dealer is otherwise exempt. Generally, an individual with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000, or annual income exceeding $200,000 individually, or $300,000 together with his or her spouse, is considered an accredited investor. The additional burdens from the penny stock requirements may deter broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our securities, which could limit the liquidity and market price of our securities. These disclosure requirements may cause a reduction in the trading activity of our common stock, which likely would make it difficult for our stockholders to resell their securities.

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted Rule 2111 that requires a broker-dealer to have reasonable grounds for believing that an investment is suitable for a customer before recommending the investment.  Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information.  Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers.  The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

Because we are a small company with a limited operating history, stockholders may find it difficult to sell their common stock in the public markets.

The number of persons interested in purchasing our common stock s at any given time may be relatively small. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is still relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors, and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would likely be reluctant to follow an unproven company such as ours.  Additionally, many brokerage firms may not be willing to effect transactions in our securities.  As a consequence, there may be periods when trading activity in our common stock is minimal or even non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity.  We cannot give you any assurance that an active public trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained, or that trading levels will be sustained.

- 12 -

---

We will continue to incur significant costs to ensure compliance with United States corporate governance and accounting requirements.

We will continue to incur significant costs associated with our public company reporting requirements, costs associated with applicable corporate governance requirements, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other rules implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission. We expect all of these applicable rules and regulations will result in significant legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time consuming and costly. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these rules, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

An investment in the Company’s common stock is extremely speculative and there can be no assurance of any return on any such investment.

An investment in the Company’s common stock is extremely speculative and there is no assurance that investors will obtain any return on their investment. Investors will be subject to substantial risks involved in an investment in the Company, including the risk of losing their entire investment. The market price of our common stock is subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in our quarterly operating results, general trends in the market and other factors, many of which we have little or no control over. In addition, broad market fluctuations, as well as general economic, business and political conditions, may adversely affect the market for our common stock, regardless of our actual or projected performance.

Our shareholders’ percentage of ownership may become diluted upon conversion of shares of our Series F convertible preferred stock, 1,000 shares of which are currently issued and outstanding and held by Garett Parsons, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and 2,450 shares of which are currently issued and outstanding and held by Steve Reinharz, the CEO of RAD.

Garett Parsons, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is the current holder of 1,000 shares of the Company’s Series F Convertible Preferred Stock, and Steve Reinharz, the CEO of RAD, is currently the holder of 2,450 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock.  As the holders of such stock, Mr. Parsons and Mr. Reinharz, can each, at any time, convert all, but not less than all of their shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock into a number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of the Company’s common stock determined by multiplying the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company on the date of conversion by three and 45 100ths (3.45).  The conversion of such shares shall cause substantial dilution to the Company’s current shareholders.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

We maintain our corporate offices at 1 East Liberty. 6 ^th Floor, Reno, Nevada 89501, pursuant to a month-to-month lease. Our annual rental cost for this facility is approximately $936 annually. RAD maintains its offices at 23121 La Cadena Suite B/C Laguna Hills, California 92675, pursuant to a five-year term ending March 31, 2022. Its annual rental cost for this facility is approximately $65,000, plus a proportionate share of operating expenses of approximately $35,000 annually.  The Company also leases premises in northern California. The lease is for three years, beginning in August 2017, and expires in August 2020. The Company shares these premises with a supplier who is the co-lessee. Through agreement with the supplier, the Company will pay 75% of the lease costs and the supplier will pay 25%. The Company’s share of rent costs approximately $43,000 annually.

On February 1, 2018 the Company entered into an additional lease for premises for a robotic control center. The lease runs from February 1, 2018 to January 31, 2021 for $6,600 annually.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. There are no legal proceeding pending at this time.

- 13 -

---

In February 2016, OMVS received notice that it had been sued in the Clark County District Court of Nevada. The plaintiff alleges that OMVS obtained certain trade secrets through a third party also named in the suit. OMVS believes the suit is without merit and intend to vigorously defend it. An Arbitration was conducted on May 9, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Trial de Novo, seeking a review of the merit dismissal. It is counsel’s opinion this Trial de Novo is without merit and OMVS should prevail.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

OMVS’s common stock began trading on the “Over the Counter” Bulletin Board (“OTC”) under the symbol “OMVS” in June 2011. The following table sets forth, for the period indicated, the prices of the common stock in the over-the-counter market, as reported and summarized by OTC Markets Group, Inc. These quotations represent inter-dealer quotations, without adjustment for retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not represent actual transactions. There is an absence of an established trading market for the Company’s common stock, as the market is limited, sporadic and highly volatile, which may affect the prices listed below.

		High			Low
Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2018:
Quarter ended February 28, 2018		$	0.12		$	0.05
Quarter ended November 30, 2017		$	0.14		$	0.04
Quarter ended August 31, 2017		$	0.27		$	0.03
Quarter ended May 31, 2017		$	0.08		$	0.02
Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2017:
Quarter ended February 28, 2017		$	0.02		$	0.00
Quarter ended November 30, 2016		$	0.10		$	0.01
Quarter ended August 31, 2016		$	0.20		$	0.07
Quarter ended May 31, 2016		$	0.50		$	0.14

On June 8, 2018, the closing price per share of the Company’s common stock as quoted on the OTC was $0.01.

Dividends

To date, we have not paid dividends on shares of the Company’s common stock and we do not expect to declare or pay dividends on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of any dividends will depend upon our future earnings, if any, OMVS’s financial condition, and other factors deemed relevant by its Board of Directors.

Holders of Common Stock

As of June 8, 2018, there were 13 holders of OMVS’s common stock. The number of foregoing holders does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of banks, brokers, nominees or other fiduciaries.

Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 480,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.001. The closing price of its common stock on June 8, 2018, as quoted by OTC Markets Group, Inc., was $0.01. There were 154,260,797 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of June 8, 2018. All shares of common stock have one vote per share on all matters including election of directors, without provision for cumulative voting. The common stock is not redeemable and has no conversion or preemptive rights. The common stock currently outstanding is validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. In the event of liquidation of the Company, the holders of common stock will share equally in any balance of its assets available for distribution to them after satisfaction of creditors and preferred shareholders, if any. The holders of the Company’s common are entitled to equal dividends and distributions per share with respect to the common stock when, as and if, declared by the Board of Directors from funds legally available.

- 14 -

---

Our Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, and the applicable statutes of the state of Nevada contain a more complete description of the rights and liabilities of holders of our securities.

During the year ended February 28, 2018, there was no modification of any instruments defining the rights of holders of the Company’s common stock and no limitation or qualification of the rights evidenced by the Company’s common stock as a result of the issuance of any other class of securities or the modification thereof.

On March 5, 2015, OMVS effected a 500-for-1 reverse split, upon its reincorporation in Nevada. Each common shareholder received one common share in the Nevada company for every 500 common shares they held in the Florida company. Fractional shares were rounded up, and each share shareholder received at least 5 shares.

Non-cumulative voting

Holders of shares of the Company’s common stock do not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares, voting for the election of directors, can elect all of the directors to be elected, if they so choose, and, in that event, the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any of our directors.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table shows the number of shares of common stock that could be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and warrants, the weighted average exercise price of the outstanding options and warrants, and the remaining shares available for future issuance.

Plan Category		Number of Securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders.		—		—		9,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders.		—		—		—
Total		—		—		9,000

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value preferred stock. The board of directors is authorized to designate any series of preferred stock up to the total authorized number of shares.

Series E Preferred Stock

The board of directors has designated 4,350,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock. As of the date of this report, there are 4,350,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock outstanding. The Series E Preferred Stock ranks subordinate to the Company’s common stock. The Series E preferred stock is non-redeemable, does not have rights upon liquidation of the Company and does not receive dividends. The outstanding shares of Series E Preferred Stock have the right to take action by written consent or vote based on the number of votes equal to twice the number of votes of all outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, the holder of Series E Preferred Stock has 2/3rds of the voting power of all shareholders at any time corporate action requires a vote of shareholders.

Series F Convertible Preferred Stock

The board of directors has designated 4,350 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock with a par value of $1.00 per share. As of the date of this report, there are 4,350 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding. The Series F Convertible Preferred Stock is non-redeemable, does not have rights upon liquidation of the Company, does not have voting rights and does not receive dividends. The each holder may, at any time and from time to time convert all, but not less than all, of their shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock into a number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of common stock determined by multiplying the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company on the date of conversion by three and 45 100ths (3.45) on a pro rata basis. So long as any shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock are outstanding, the Company shall

- 15 -

---

not, without first obtaining the approval of the majority of the holders: (a) alter or change the rights, preferences or privileges of any capital stock of the Company so as to affect adversely the Series F convertible preferred stock; (b) create any Senior Securities; (c) create any pari passu Securities; (d) do any act or thing not authorized or contemplated by the Certificate of Designation which would result in any taxation with respect to the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock under Section 305 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or any comparable provision of the Internal Revenue Code as hereafter from time to time amended, (or otherwise suffer to exist any such taxation as a result thereof).

Series G Preferred Stock

The board of directors has designated 1,000 shares of Series G Preferred Stock. As of the date of this report, there are no shares of Series G Preferred Stock outstanding. The Series G preferred stock does not have voting rights, does not have rights upon liquidation of the Company and does not receive dividends. These shares were created after February 28, 2017.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The Transfer Agent for our capital stock is Island Stock Transfer with an address at 15500 Roosevelt Boulevard, Suite 301, Clearwater, Florida 33760. Their telephone number is Office phone: 727-289-0010.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

The following is a summary of transactions by OMVS involving sales of its securities that were not registered under the Securities Act.

On August 28, 2017, OMVS entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with RAD and Steve Reinharz, as sole stockholder of RAD. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, OMVS acquired, on August 28, 2017, 10,000 shares of RAD’s common stock, representing all of RAD’s issued and outstanding capital stock, from Mr. Reinharz in exchange for the issuance by OMVS of (i) 3,350,000 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock and, (ii) 2,450 shares of our Series F Convertible Preferred Stock.  In connection with the foregoing, the Registrant relied upon the exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder, in reliance upon Section 4(a)(2) thereof and Regulation D thereunder.

During the period from June 1, 2017 through July 25, 2017, OMVS issued 8,922,279 shares of common stock upon cashless exercise of warrants held by one of the Company’s lenders who also converted $3,358 in interest and principal for 395,667 shares for a total of 9,317,946 shares issued.

On July 8, 2017, OMVS issued a convertible note payable for $200,000 which bears interest at 8% per annum and is due July 6, 2018. The note is convertible into common stock of the Company at a 40% discount to the lowest trading price in during the 20 trading days prior to conversion.

In connection with the foregoing, the Registrant relied upon the exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder, in reliance upon Section 4(a)(2) thereof and Regulation D thereunder.

On February 16, 2017, OMVS closed on a Share Purchase Agreement with Capital Venture Holdings LLC (“Capital Venture”), a Wyoming Limited Liability Company, whereby OMVS issued Capital Venture 1,000 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock, representing all of the issued and outstanding shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock to Capital Venture in consideration for $5,000. Mr. Garett Parsons is the sole and managing member of Capital Venture.

In connection with the foregoing, OMVS relied upon the exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder, in reliance upon Section 4(a)(2) thereof and Regulation D thereunder.

Penny Stock Regulations

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share. Our Common Stock falls within the definition of penny stock and therefore is subject to rules that impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally those with assets in excess of $1,000,000, or annual incomes

- 16 -

---

exceeding $200,000 individually, or $300,000, together with their spouse). For transactions covered by these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of such securities and have received the purchaser’s prior written consent to the transaction. Additionally, for any transaction, other than exempt transactions, involving a penny stock, the rules require the delivery, prior to the transaction, of a risk disclosure document mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer must also make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. In addition, the broker-dealer must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market-maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer’s presumed control over the market. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. Consequently, the “penny stock” rules may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to sell our Common Stock and may affect the ability of investors to sell their Common Stock in the secondary market. In addition to the “penny stock” rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit the investors’ ability to buy and sell our stock.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Registrant and Affiliated Purchasers

We have not repurchased any shares of our common stock during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2018.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes to those financial statements that are included elsewhere in this report. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth under the Risk Factors, Forward-Looking Statements and Business sections in this report. We use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.

Overview

OMVS was incorporated in Florida on March 25, 2010. OMVS reincorporated into Nevada on February 17, 2015. OMVS’ fiscal year end is February 28. OMVS is located at 1 East Liberty, 6 ^th Floor, Reno, NV 89501 and our telephone number is 702-990-3271.

OMVS’ prior business focus was transportation services and it was exploring the on-demand logistics market by developing a network of logistics partnerships.

On August 28, 2017, OMVS entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) with RAD and Steve Reinharz, as sole stockholder of RAD. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, OMVS acquired, on August 28, 2017, 10,000 shares of RAD’s common stock, representing all of RAD’s issued and outstanding capital stock, from Mr. Reinharz in exchange for the issuance by OMVS of (i) 3,350,000 shares of its Series E Preferred Stock and, (ii) 2,450 shares of its Series F Convertible Preferred Stock. As a result of the RAD acquisition, RAD is a wholly owned subsidiary of OMVS. As a result of the closing of the RAD acquisition, OMVS has succeeded to the business of RAD, in which it purchased all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of RAD. As a result, OMVS’ business going forward will consist of one segment activity which is the delivery of artificial intelligence and robotic solutions for operational, security and monitoring needs.

- 17 -

---

The RAD acquisition is being treated as a reverse recapitalization effected by a share exchange for financial accounting and reporting purposes since substantially all of our prior operations were disposed of as part of the consummation of the transaction and therefore no goodwill or other intangible assets were recorded. RAD is treated as the accounting acquirer as its stockholders control the Company after the RAD Acquisition, even though the Company was the legal acquirer.  As a result, the assets and liabilities and the historical operations that are reflected in these financial statements are those of RAD as if RAD had always been the reporting company.

Results of Operations

The following table shows our results of operations for the year ended February 28, 2018, the two months ended February 28, 2017 and period from inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016. The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period.

Revenue

The Company began to earn revenues of for the year ended February 28, 2018 of $106,476, but had no revenues for the period from inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016 and for the two months ended February 28, 2017, since the Company had just begun operations and was still in product development.

Operating expenses

Operating expenses for the year ended February 28, 2018, the two months ended February 28, 2017 and period from inception  (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016, were comprised of the following:

- 18 -

---

Our operating expenses were comprised of general and administrative expenses, research and development, depreciation and amortization, and a loss on impairment of fixed assets. General and administrative expenses consisted primarily of professional services, automobile expenses, advertising, salaries and wages, travel expenses and rent. Our operating expenses during the year ended February 28, 2018 and the two months ended February 28, 2017 were $3,578,301 and $81,203, respectively. The overall $3,497,098 increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to the following increases in operating expenses of:

●	General and administrative expenses – $2,336,808
●	Research and development – $472,847
●	Depreciation and amortization – $123,887
●	Loss on impairment of fixed assets – $563,556

The $3,497,098 increase in operating expenses are a result of the start of RAD’s operations in 2017.

Our operating expenses during the year ended February 28, 2018 and the period from inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016 were $3,578,301 and $79,921, respectively. The overall $3,498,380 increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to the following increases in operating expenses of:

●	General and administrative expenses – $2,342,315
●	Research and development – $462,428
●	Depreciation and amortization – $130,081
●	Loss on impairment of fixed assets – $563,556

The $3,498,380 increase in operating expenses are a result of the start of RAD’s operations in 2017.

Other income (expense)

Other income (expense) consisted of the change of fair value of derivative liabilities, gain on settlement of debt, and interest expense, amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts. Other income (expense) for the year ended February 28, 2018, the two months ended February 28, 2017 and for the period from inception (July 26, 2016) through December 31, 2016 was ($20,732,176), ($2,732) and ($1,183), respectively. The significant  increases in other expense was primarily attributable to the interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts, partially offset by a change in the fair value of derivatives and the gain on settlement of debt.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

For the year ended February 28, 2018, the Company had negative cash flow from operating activities of $3,309,230. As of February 28, 2018, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $35,504,029 and negative working capital of $34,292,202. Management does not anticipate having positive cash flow from operations in the near future. These factors raise a substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the twelve months following the issuance of these financial statements.

The Company does not have the resources at this time to repay its credit and debt obligations, make any payments in the form of dividends to its shareholders or fully implement its business plan. Without additional capital, the Company will not be able to remain in business.

Management has plans to address the Company’s financial situation as follows:

In the near term, management plans to continue to focus on raising the funds necessary to implement the Company’s business plan. Management will continue to seek out debt financing to obtain the capital required to meet the Company’s financial obligations. There is no assurance, however, that lenders will continue to advance capital to the Company or that the new business operations will be profitable. The possibility of failure in obtaining additional funding and the potential inability to achieve profitability raises doubts about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

- 19 -

---

Capital Resources 

The following table summarizes total current assets, liabilities and working capital for the period indicated:

As of February 28, 2018, we had a cash balance of $24,773.

Summary of Cash Flows

Net cash used in operating activities

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended February 28, 2018 was $3,309,230. This included a net loss of $24,249,001, gain on settlement of debt of $1,175,028 and a change in operating assets of $89,010. These instances of decreases in cash are offset by a change in fair value of derivative financial instruments of $9,495,321 (non-cash), interest expense related to derivative liability on excess of face value of debt change of $10,797,663, amortization of debt discounts of $1,214,348, a loss on impairment of fixed assets of $563,556, stock-based compensation of $2,840 and depreciation and amortization of $130,081.

Net cash used in investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended February 28, 2018, was $239,490, which consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $228,371, cash paid for security deposit of $30,141 and was offset by cash proceeds from the WeSecure transaction of $17,000 and cash acquired in reverse capitalization of $2,022.

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended February 28, 2018, was $3,516,586, which resulted from proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes of $2,558,345, net borrowings from loan payable-related party $219,613, loan from OMVS to RAD prior to reverse recapitalization of $752,500, proceeds from vehicle loan $47,661 and was reduced by principal repayment on convertible note payable of $50,000 and payments on a vehicle loan of $11,533.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any outstanding off-balance sheet guarantees, interest rate swap transactions or foreign currency forward contracts. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. We do not have any variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to us or that engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.

- 20 -

---

Significant Accounting Policies

Robot Parts Inventory

Robot parts inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market using the weighted average cost method. The Company records a valuation reserve for obsolete and slow-moving inventory, relying principally on specific identification of such inventory. The Company uses these robot parts in the assembly of revenue earning robots and demo robots as well as research and development. Depending on use, the Company will transfer the parts to the corresponding asset or expense if used in research and development. A charge to income is taken when factors that would result in a need for an increase in the valuation, such as excess or obsolete inventory, are noted.

Revenue Earning Robots

Revenue earning robots are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of 48 months. The Company continually evaluates revenue earning robots to determine whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred that may warrant revision of the estimated useful life or whether the robot should be evaluated for possible impairment. The Company uses a combination of the undiscounted cash flows and market approaches in assessing whether an asset has been impaired. The Company measures impairment losses based upon the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value.

Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the respective assets which range from two to five years. Major repairs or improvements are capitalized. Minor replacements and maintenance and repairs which do not improve or extend asset lives are expensed currently.

Demo robots		4 years
Computer equipment		3 years
Office equipment		4 years
Vehicles		3 years
Leasehold improvements		5 years, the life of the lease

The Company periodically evaluates the fair value of fixed assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Upon retirement or other disposition of fixed assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is recognized in income.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed in the period they are incurred, unless they meet specific criteria related to technical, market and financial feasibility, as determined by Management, including but not limited to the establishment of a clearly defined future market for the product, and the availability of adequate resources to complete the project. If all criteria are met, the costs are deferred and amortized over the expected useful life or written off if a product is abandoned. At February 28, 2018, the Company had no deferred development costs.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, goods are delivered for rental and/or services are rendered, sales price is determinable, and collection is reasonably assured.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC Topic 820”) provides a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs).

- 21 -

---

The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820 are described as follows:

	●	Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date.
	●	Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
	●	Level 3 – Inputs that are unobservable for the asset or liability.

The carrying amounts of RAD ’ s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2017-01,  Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business , which amends the current definition of a business. Under ASU 2017-01, to be considered a business, an acquisition would have to include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contributes to the ability to create outputs. ASU 2017-01 further states that when substantially all of the fair value of gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single asset (or a group of similar assets), the assets acquired would not represent a business. The new guidance also narrows the definition of the term “outputs” to be consistent with how it is described in Topic 606,  Revenue from Contracts with Customers . The changes to the definition of a business will likely result in more acquisitions being accounted for as asset acquisitions. The guidance is effective for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company has elected to early adopt ASU 2017-01 and to apply it to any transaction, which occurred prior to the issuance date that has not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) . The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. This standard is effective for fiscal years and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date.  The amendments in this update deferred the effective date for implementation of ASU 2014-09 by one year and is now effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim reporting periods within that period. Topic 606 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of Fiscal 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the new revenue recognition guidance. The Company has completed its initial impact assessment and has commenced an in-depth evaluation of the adoption impact, which involves review of selected revenue arrangements. Based on the Company’s preliminary review, the Company believes that the timing and measurement of revenue for its customers will be similar to the Company’s current revenue recognition. However, this view is preliminary and could change based on further analysis associated with the conversion and implementation phases of our ASU 2014-09 project.

From March 2016 through September 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, ASU 2016-11, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting, ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606):Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients , ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers and ASU No. 2017-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Leases (Topic 840), and Leases (Topic 842): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to the Staff Announcement at the July 20, 2017 EITF Meeting and Rescission of Prior SEC Staff Announcements and Observer Comments. These amendments are intended to improve and clarify the implementation guidance of Topic 606. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments are the same as the effective date and transition requirements of ASU No. 2014-09 and ASU No. 2015-14.

- 22 -

---

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) , which is effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Under ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: 1) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis, and 2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments . ASU 2016-15 eliminates the diversity in practice related to the classification of certain cash receipts and payments for debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, the maturing of a zero-coupon bond, the settlement of contingent liabilities arising from a business combination, proceeds from insurance settlements, distributions from certain equity method investees and beneficial interests obtained in a financial asset securitization. ASU 2016-15 designates the appropriate cash flow classification, including requirements to allocate certain components of these cash receipts and payments among operating, investing and financing activities. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning after December 15, 2017, although early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-15 on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force . ASU 2016-18 requires restricted cash and cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents on the statement cash flows. The new standard is expected to be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-18 on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception . Part I of this update addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. Part II of this update addresses the difficulty of navigating Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity , because of the existence of extensive pending content in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This pending content is the result of the indefinite deferral of accounting requirements about mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests. The amendments in Part II of this update do not have an accounting effect. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of adopting ASU 2017-11 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We do not have any financial instruments that are exposed to significant market risk. We maintain our cash and cash equivalents in bank deposits and short-term, highly liquid money market investments. A hypothetical 100-basis point increase or decrease in market interest rates would not have a material impact on the fair value of our cash equivalents securities, or our earnings on such cash equivalents.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules appearing on pages F-1 through F-22 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

On February 19, 2018, our Board of Directors  approved and ratified the engagement of GBH CPAs, PC (“GBH”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the Company’s fiscal year ended February 28, 2018, effective immediately, and dismissed Friedman, LLP (“Friedman”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

From September 25, 2017 to February 19, 2018, there were (i) no disagreements (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) between the Company and Friedman on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.

- 23 -

---

Prior to the appointment of GBH, on September 25, 2017, our Board of Directors approved and ratified the engagement of Friedman LLP (“Friedman”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the Company’s fiscal year ending February 28, 2018, effective immediately, and dismissed MaloneBailey, LLP (“MaloneBailey”) as our independent registered public accounting firm.

MaloneBailey’s audit report on OMVS’ consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2017, did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, other than an explanatory paragraph regarding the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

During the two months ended February 28, 2017, and the subsequent interim periods through September 25, 2017, there were (i) no disagreements (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) between the Company and MaloneBailey on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to MaloneBailey’s satisfaction, would have caused MaloneBailey to make reference thereto in their report on the financial statements for such year, and (ii) no “reportable events” within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S- K.

During the two months ended February 28, 2017, and the subsequent interim periods through September 25, 2017, neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf has consulted with Friedman regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements or the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and neither a written report or oral advice was provided to the Company that Friedman concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, (ii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K, or (iii) any reportable event within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of February 28, 2018, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of February 28, 2018, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Limitations on Systems of Controls

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. To address the material weaknesses identified in our evaluation, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures in an effort to ensure our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:

- 24 -

---

•	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
•	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
•	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

As of February 28, 2018, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 framework) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of U.S. GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: lack of a functioning audit committee; lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors; inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives; and, management is dominated by a single individual. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Executive Officer in connection with the review of our financial statements as of February 28, 2018.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth above did not have an effect on our financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.

This report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No changes were made to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended February 28, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.  

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

- 25 -

---

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following table sets forth the names, positions and ages of our directors and executive officers as of the date of this report. Our directors serve for one year and until their successors are elected and qualified. Our officers are elected by the board of directors to a term of one year and serve until their successor is duly elected and qualified, or until they are removed from office. The board of directors has no nominating, auditing or compensation committees.

Name		Age		Position(s)
Garett Parsons		34		President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director

Biographical information concerning our director and executive officer listed above is set forth below.

Garett Parsons. Mr. Parsons has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and member of our board of directors since February 2017. Mr. Parsons has over 10 years of financial consulting for both private and public equity markets. Mr. Parsons has extensive experience in the field of asset valuation, funding structures and public release document generation. His education includes a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science/Economics from California State University Sacramento and an Associate of Arts in Liberal Studies/ Business San Joaquin Delta College and West Hills College.

There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers and directors. During the past 10 years, Mr. Parsons was involved in any of the legal proceedings listed in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K. There are no arrangements or understandings between Mr. Parsons and any other person pursuant to which he was or is to be selected as an executive officer or director.

Board Committees and Director Independence

As Mr. Parsons serves as our sole director, we do not have a separately designated audit committee, compensation committee or nominating and corporate governance committee. The functions of those committees are being undertaken by our sole director. Because we do not have any independent directors and have only one director, our sole director believes that the establishment of committees of the Board would not provide any benefits to our company and could be considered more form than substance.

We currently do not have any non-employee or independent directors, as such term is defined in the listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market, and we do not anticipate appointing additional directors in the near future.

Our sole director is not an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 401(e) of Regulation S-K. As with most small, early stage companies until such time our company further develops its business, achieves a stronger revenue base and has sufficient working capital to purchase directors and officer’s insurance, the Company does not have any immediate prospects to attract independent directors. When the Company is able to expand our Board of Directors to include one or more independent directors, the Company intends to establish an Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. It is our intention that one or more of these independent directors will also qualify as an audit committee financial expert. Our securities are not quoted on an exchange that has requirements that a majority of our Board members be independent, and the Company is not currently otherwise subject to any law, rule or regulation requiring that all or any portion of our Board of Directors include “independent” directors, nor are we required to establish or maintain an Audit Committee or other committee of our Board of Directors.

Procedures for Nominating Directors

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Board since the most recently completed fiscal quarter. We do not have a policy regarding the consideration of any director candidates that may be recommended by our stockholders, including the minimum qualifications for director candidates, nor has our sole director established a process for identifying and evaluating director nominees. We have not adopted a policy regarding the handling of any potential recommendation of director candidates by our stockholders, including the procedures to be followed. Our sole director has not considered or adopted any of these policies, as we have never received a recommendation from any stockholder for any candidate to serve on our Board of Directors. Given our relative size and lack of directors and officers insurance coverage, we do not anticipate that any of our stockholders will make such a recommendation in the near future.

While there have been no nominations of additional directors proposed, in the event such a proposal is made, all current members of our Board will participate in the consideration of director nominees.

- 26 -

---

Director Qualifications

Mr. Parsons was appointed to our board in February 2017. Mr. Parsons has significant operational experience in our industry and brings both a practical understanding of the industry and as well as hands-on experience in our business sector to our board and a greater understanding of certain of the challenges we face in executing our growth strategy.

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct

We have adopted a code of ethics meeting the requirements of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We believe our code of ethics is reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct; provide full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in public reports; comply with applicable laws; ensure prompt internal reporting of violations; and provide accountability for adherence to the provisions of the code of ethics.

Director Compensation

Mr. Parsons, our sole director, does not receive any additional compensation for his services as a director. We reimburse our directors for all reasonable ordinary and necessary business-related expenses, but we did not pay director’s fees or other cash compensation for services rendered as a director during the year ended February 28, 2018 or the two months ended February 28, 2017 to any of the individuals serving on our Board during that period. We have no standard arrangement pursuant to which our directors are compensated for their services in their capacity as directors. We may pay fees for services rendered as a director when and if additional directors are appointed to the Board of Directors.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common shares and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations that no other reports were required, and to the best of our knowledge, we believe that all of our officers, directors, and owners of 10% or more of our common stock filed all required Forms 3, 4, and 5.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table summarizes all compensation recorded by us in the past two fiscal years for Mr. Parsons, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Mr. Wilson, our former Chief Executive Officer.

2018 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position		Year		Salary or Fees ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
Garett Parsons,		2018		69,768		—		—		—		—		—		—		69,768
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (1)		2017		2,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		2,000
Robert Wilson,		2018		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Former Chief Executive Officer (2)		2017		120,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		120,000

__________

(1)	Mr. Parsons was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer on February 16, 2017.
(2)	Mr. Wilson ceased to be an executive officer on February 16, 2017.

Employment Agreements

We are not currently a party to an employment agreement with Mr. Parsons, our sole executive officer. We may enter into an employment agreement with Mr. Parsons in the future, however. We have no plans providing for the payment of any retirement benefits.

- 27 -

---

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2018 Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for Mr. Parsons, our sole executive officer outstanding as of February 28, 2018:

OPTION AWARDS												STOCK AWARDS
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
Garett Parsons		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

At February 28, 2018, OMVS had 125,004,554 shares of its common stock issued and outstanding. The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of February 28, 2018, and reflects:

●	each of our executive officers;
●	each of our directors;
●	all of our directors and executive officers as a group; and
●	each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock.

Information on beneficial ownership of securities is based upon a record list of our stockholders and we have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. We believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws, except as otherwise provided below.

Name		Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1)		Percent of Class (2)
Named Executive Officers and Directors:
Garett Parsons (3)		125,004,554		22.47%
Robert Wilson (4)		—		0.0%
All executive officers and directors as a group (1 persons)		125,004,554		22.47%
5% Stockholders:
Steve Reinharz (5)		306,261,157		55.06%
23121 La Cadena Suite B/C, Laguna Hills, California 92675

__________

(1)

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Beneficial ownership also includes shares of stock subject to options and warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the date of this table. In determining the percent of common stock owned by a person or entity as of the date of this Report, (a) the numerator is the number of shares of the class beneficially owned by such person or entity, including shares which may be acquired within 60 days on exercise of warrants or options and conversion of convertible securities, and (b) the denominator is the sum of (i) the total shares of common stock outstanding on as of the date of this Report 125,004,554 shares, and (ii) the total number of shares that the beneficial owner may acquire upon exercise of the derivative securities. Unless otherwise stated, each beneficial owner has sole power to vote and dispose of its shares.

- 28 -

---

(2)	Based on 125,004,554 shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding as of the date of this report.
(3)	Mr. Wilson ceased to be an officer and director in February 2017 and sold his shares in the market to unrelated parties.
(4)	Mr. Parsons is the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and owns 1,000,000 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock and 1,000 shares of our Series F Preferred Stock. If Mr. Parsons converted the 1,000 shares of the Company’s Series F Preferred stock, he would receive 431,265,711 shares of the Company’s common stock, which is included in the chart above as if such conversion has occurred.  Further, the outstanding shares of Series E preferred stock have the right to take action by written consent or vote based on the number of votes equal to twice the number of votes of all outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, the holder of Series E preferred stock has 2/3rds of the voting power of all shareholders at any time corporate action requires a vote of shareholders.
(5)	Steve Reinharz is the CEO of RAD and is the holder of (i) 3,350,000 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock and, (ii) 2,450 shares of our Series F Convertible Preferred Stock. If Mr. Reinharz converted the 2,450 shares of the Company’s Series F Convertible Preferred Stock, he would receive 306,261,157 shares of the Company’s common stock, which is included in the chart above as if such conversion has occurred.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

We do not have a written policy for the review, approval or ratification of transactions with related parties or conflicted transactions. When such transactions arise, they are referred to our board of directors for its consideration.

The sole shareholder and owner of RAD loaned RAD certain funds to pay for RAD’s expenses.  The loans are non-interest bearing and unsecured, with no specific terms of repayment or collateral. For the year ended February 28, 2018, the Company received net advances of $219,613 from its loan payable to a related party. At February 28, 2018 and 2017, the balance due to the related party was $316,142, and $62,529, respectively.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

On September 25, 2017, our Board of Directors approved and ratified the engagement of GBH CPAs, PC (“GBH CPAs”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the Company’s fiscal year ending February 28, 2018, effective immediately, and dismissed MaloneBailey as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The following table shows the fees that were billed for the audit and other services provided by MaloneBailey and GBH CPAs for the fiscal years ended February 28, 2018 and 2017.

		2018			2017
Audit Fees
MaloneBailey		$	—		$	30,000
GBH CPAs			25,000			—
Total Audit Fees			25,000			30,000
Audit-Related Fees			—			—
Tax Fees			—			—
All Other Fees			—			—
Total		$	25,000		$	30,000

Audit Fees - This category includes the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with engagements for those fiscal years. This category also includes advice on audit and accounting matters that arose during, or as a result of, the audit or the review of interim financial statements.

Audit-Related Fees - This category consists of assurance and related services by the independent registered public accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported above under “Audit Fees.” The services for the fees disclosed under this category would include consultation regarding correspondence with the SEC, other accounting consulting and other audit services.

- 29 -

---

Tax Fees - This category consists of professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for tax compliance and tax advice. The services for the fees disclosed under this category include tax return preparation and technical tax advice.

All Other Fees - This category consists of fees for other miscellaneous items.

As part of its responsibility for oversight of the independent registered public accountants, the Board has established a pre-approval policy for engaging audit and permitted non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accountants. In accordance with this policy, each type of audit, audit-related, tax and other permitted service to be provided by the independent auditors is specifically described and each such service, together with a fee level or budgeted amount for such service, is pre-approved by the Board. All of the services provided by MaloneBailey and GBH CPAs described above were approved by our Board.

The Company’s principal accountant did not engage any other persons or firms other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1) Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are listed in the Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules on page F-1 and included on pages F-2 through F-22.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are either not required under the related instructions, are not applicable (and therefore have been omitted), or the required disclosures are contained in the financial statements included herein.

- 30 -

---

(3) Exhibits.

Exhibit No.		Description of Document
2.1		Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 28, 2017, by and among the registrant, Steve Reinharz and Robotic Assistance Devices Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 31, 2017).
3.1		Articles of Incorporation of the registrant filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on September 8, 2014. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s transition report on Form 10-KT filed with the Commission on March 12, 2018).
3.2		Plan and Agreement of Merger of On the Move Systems Corp. (a Florida corporation) and On the Move Systems Corp. (a Nevada corporation). (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the registrant’s transition report on Form 10-KT filed with the Commission on March 12, 2018).
3.3		Bylaws of the registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168530), filed with the Commission on August 4, 2010).
3.4		Certificate of Designations filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on February 8, 2017. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the registrant’s transition report on Form 10-KT filed with the Commission on March 12, 2018).
3.5		Certificate of Designations filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on May 3, 2017. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the registrant’s transition report on Form 10-KT filed with the Commission on March 12, 2018).
3.6		Amendment to Certificate of Designations filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on May 3, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 12, 2017).
10.1		Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 31, 2017 and entered into between the Company and Capital Venture Holdings LLC. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s transition report on Form 10-KT filed with the Commission on March 12, 2018).
14.1		Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the registrant’s registrant statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168530) , filed with the Commission on August 4, 2010).
21.1		List of Subsidiaries. *
31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
101.INS		XBRL Instance **
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema **
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation **
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition **
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels **
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation **

__________

*	Filed or furnished herewith.
**	In accordance with Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files in Exhibit 101 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed “furnished” and not “filed.”

- 31 -

---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.
Date: June 22, 2018	By:	/s/ Garett Parsons
		Garett Parsons
		President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature		Title		Date
/s/ Garett Parsons		President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director (principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)		June 22, 2018
Garett Parsons

- 32 -

---

ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms	F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-5
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit	F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-7
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	F-8

F-1

---

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the stockholders and the board of directors of

On The Move Systems Corp.

Reno, Nevada

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of On The Move Systems Corp. (the “Company”) as of February 28, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year ended February 28, 2018 and for the two months ended February 28, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”).  In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of February 28, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended February 28, 2018 and for the two months ended February 28, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits.  We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks.  Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Other Matters

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 2 to  the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ GBH CPAs, PC

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2018.

GBH CPAs, PC

www.gbhcpas.com

Houston, Texas

June 13, 2018

F-2

---

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Director and Stockholder

Robotic Assistance Devices, LLC

Laguna Hills, California 92675

We have audited the accompanying statement of operations and cash flows of Robotic Assistance Devices, LLC (the “Company”) for the period from Inception on July 26, 2016 through December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibilities of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of the Company’s operations and its cash flows for the period from inception on July 26, 2016 through December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP

www.malonebailey.com

Houston, Texas

August 31, 2017

F-3

---

ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.

(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

---

ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.

(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

__________

(1)	The weighted average number of common shares outstanding was computed by multiplying the number of common shares of OMVS outstanding as of February 28, 2017 by 3.45 based on the terms listed under the amended Certificate of Designation for OMVS’s Series F Convertible Preferred Stock.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

---

ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.

(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

FOR THE YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2018, THE TWO MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2017

AND THE PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (JULY 26, 2016) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2016

		Series E					Series FConvertible										Additional						Total
		Preferred Stock					Preferred Stock					Common Stock					Paid-In			Accumulated			Stockholders’
		Shares		Amount			Shares		Amount			Shares		Amount			Capital			Deficit			Deficit
Balance at Inception July 26, 2016		3,350,000		$	3,350		2,450		$	2,450		—		$	—		$	13,857		$	(19,658	)	$	(1	)
Net loss		—			—		—			—		—			—			—			(81,104	)		(81,104	)
Balance at December 31, 2016		3,350,000		$	3,350		2,450		$	2,450		—		$	—		$	13,857		$	(100,762	)	$	(81,105	)
Net loss		—			—		—			—		—			—			—			(83,935	)		(83,935	)
Balance at February 28, 2017		3,350,000		$	3,350		2,450		$	2,450		—		$	—		$	13,857		$	(184,697	)	$	(165,040	)
Common stock and preferred stock issued for recapitalization by RAD		1,000,000			1,000		1,000			1,000		101,987,887			101,987			306,588			(11,070,331	)		(10,659,756	)
Common stock issued for debt conversion		—			—		—			—		23,016,667			23,017			785,023			—			808,040
Stock based compensation		—			—		—			—		—			—			2,840			—			2,840
Net loss		—			—		—			—		—			—			—			(24,249,001	)		(24,249,001	)
Balance at February 28, 2018		4,350,000		$	4,350		3,450		$	3,450		125,004,554		$	125,004		$	1,108,308		$	(35,504,029	)	$	(34,262,917	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

---

ON THE MOVE SYSTEMS CORP.

(f/k/a ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE DEVICES, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS