Shari Redstone Alleges CBS CEO Threatened to Quit If Board Didn't Strip Redstones of Control -- Update
May 29 2018 - 12:34PM
Dow Jones News
By Keach Hagey and Joe Flint
Shari Redstone shot back at CBS Corp. in court Tuesday, alleging
that CBS Chief Executive Leslie Moonves gave the CBS board an
"ultimatum" that he would resign unless directors voted to strip
her family of voting control.
In a complaint filed Tuesday in the Delaware Court of Chancery,
Ms. Redstone and her family holding company, National Amusements
Inc., say that CBS's action to strip National Amusements of voting
control by issuing a dilutive dividend to all shareholders is
invalid.
They say that the recent legal attacks against the Redstone
family aren't motivated by the CBS board's concern over being
forced to merge with corporate sibling, Viacom Inc., as CBS says.
Rather, Ms. Redstone says that the motivation is Mr. Moonves's
opportunistic seizure of the moment to throw off the yoke of having
a controlling shareholder that he has long chafed against,
according to the complaint.
"The only cogent, but manifestly improper, explanation for the
Director Defendants' unprecedented action is that Leslie 'Les'
Moonves, CBS's longtime CEO, has tired of having to deal with a
stockholder with voting control and has taken particular umbrage
that the exercise of such stockholder's control has migrated from
Sumner Redstone to his daughter, Ms. Redstone," the complaint
alleges.
Ms. Redstone, the vice chairman of CBS and Viacom, rose to power
in 2016 following a power struggle at Viacom that led to the
resignation of her ailing 95-year-old father, Sumner Redstone, from
the boards of both media companies.
In the wake of several months of merger talks that stalled over
how the merged company would be managed, CBS filed a lawsuit on May
14 saying it had voted against a merger and was seeking to block
National Amusements from being able to replace any board members
before it could vote on stripping the firm of control. National
Amusements then changed CBS's bylaws to require 90% of directors to
support such a move, a day before the CBS board held the vote. The
outcome is now up to a Delaware judge.
"Today's reactive complaint from NAI was not unexpected," CBS
said in a statement. "The amended complaint filed last week by CBS
and its Special Committee details the ways in which NAI misused its
power to the detriment of CBS shareholders, and was submitted after
careful deliberation by all involved. We continue to believe firmly
in our position."
In the complaint, Ms. Redstone and National Amusements reiterate
their insistence that they were never going to pursue a merger
without the companies' support. In fact, according to the
complaint, a week before the CBS special committee convened to
recommend against a merger and filed a lawsuit, "NAI had determined
that it no longer supported a merger" and Ms. Redstone told
Viacom's special committee about the decision. The special
committee told her that it preferred to have a chance to complete
its assignment, the complaint says. The court documents don't
specify whether CBS was notified.
A person familiar with CBS's position said that neither National
Amusements nor Viacom had ever suggested to CBS that they no longer
supported the merger, and noted that National Amusements had been
saying that a merger was close and that a price had been agreed
upon.
Mr. Moonves had tried to rid himself of the Redstones' control
at least twice before, Ms. Redstone and National Amusements say. In
2006, he asked whether National Amusements would consider a
transaction in which Mr. Moonves and his partners would take CBS
private -- a discussion that "led nowhere," they allege, given Mr.
Redstone's clear statements about wanting to maintain control.
Mr. Moonves approached National Amusements again in 2015, asking
about a transaction in which the family holding company would be
paid a premium in exchange for giving up its control of CBS, which
also went nowhere, Tuesday's complaint says.
The complaint also makes clearer the nature of the allegations
of "bullying and intimidation" that Ms. Redstone and National
Amusements had previously lodged against CBS director Charles
Gifford, a member of the company's compensation committee that she
had asked to be quietly removed from the board.
In one case, the complaint alleges Mr. Gifford "acted in an
intimidating and bullying manner, including on one occasion by
grabbing [Ms. Redstone's] face and directing her to listen to him."
Mr. Gifford later told her that he meant no offense, and "that was
how he treats his daughters when he wants their attention,"
according to the complaint.
Mr. Gifford didn't immediately respond to requests for
comment.
"Ms. Redstone's issue with Mr. Gifford is that he has always
operated by an entirely different definition of what it means to be
an independent director -- namely to act in the best interest of
all CBS shareholders," CBS said. "As a result of Mr. Gifford's
steadfast belief in good corporate governance, it is unfortunate
and revealing that NAI has resorted to baseless personal attacks
that are clearly tied to the execution of Mr. Gifford's duties in
this matter."
Write to Keach Hagey at keach.hagey@wsj.com and Joe Flint at
joe.flint@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
May 29, 2018 12:19 ET (16:19 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
CBS (NYSE:CBS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
CBS (NYSE:CBS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024