VHC VirnetX Holding Corp

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant   o

Check the appropriate box:

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

VirnetX Holding Corporation 308 Dorla Ct. Zephyr Cove, NV 89448 www.virnetx.com April 12, 2018

To the Stockholders of VirnetX Holding Corporation:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Annual Meeting”) of VirnetX Holding Corporation to be held on Thursday, May 24, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time, at the MontBleu Resort Casino & Spa - South Lake Tahoe, 55 Highway 50, Stateline, Nevada 89449. At the Annual Meeting, we will ask you to consider the following proposals:

Our board of directors has fixed the close of business on April 2, 2018 as the record date for the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”). Only stockholders of record as of the Record Date may vote at the Annual Meeting. Further information regarding voting rights and matters to be voted upon is presented in the accompanying proxy statement.

On or about April 12, 2018, we expect to mail to our stockholders of record as of the Record Date a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement accompanying this letter (the “Proxy Statement”) and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017 (the “Annual Report”) online. The Notice provides instructions on how to vote online or by telephone and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. The Proxy Statement and the Annual Report can be accessed directly at www.proxyvote.com . All you have to do is enter the control number located on your proxy card.

Your vote is important to us. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to submit your vote online, by telephone or by mail.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
OF
VIRNETX HOLDING CORPORATION

environment. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by email, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting website. Your election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect until you terminate it.

Street Name Stockholders . If your shares are held by a broker, bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name and the Proxy Statement should be forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other nominee, who is considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares. Beneficial owners are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee. If you request a printed copy of the proxy materials by mail, your broker, bank or other nominee will provide a voting instruction card for you to use.

Registered Stockholders : Registered stockholders may vote by one of the following methods:

Please note that online and telephone voting facilities for registered stockholders will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 23, 2018.

Street Name Stockholders : If your shares are held by a broker, bank or other nominee, you should have received instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote or instruct your broker, bank or other nominee to vote your shares. Please follow their instructions carefully. Also, please note that if the holder of record of your shares is a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you must request and obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee and present that proxy or voting instruction card and valid, government-issued photo identification at the Annual Meeting in order to vote your shares.

Street name stockholders may generally vote by one of the following methods:

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may change your vote:

The two director nominees receiving the highest number of votes cast by the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting on this matter will be elected to the Board.

For Proposal II - Ratification of Farber Hass Hurley LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm , you may vote “ FOR ,” “ AGAINST ” or “ ABSTAIN .” If you abstain from voting on Proposal II, your shares will be counted as present and entitled to vote for the purpose of establishing a quorum, but your abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. If you hold your shares in street name, your broker, bank or nominee will have discretionary authority to vote on Proposal II if they do not receive instructions from you.

Ratification of Farber Hass Hurley LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting on this matter.

Finally, if you sign and return your proxy card with no further instructions, your shares will be counted as a vote “ FOR ” both Class II director nominees; and “ FOR ” the ratification of the appointment of Farber Hass Hurley LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. In addition, the proxy also delegates discretionary authority to vote with respect to any other business which may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy or if you vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, a majority of the votes present at the meeting may adjourn the meeting to another date.

Under the rules that govern brokers who have record ownership of shares that are held in “street name” for their clients, the beneficial owners of the shares, brokers have discretion to vote these shares on routine matters but not on non-routine matters. If you hold common stock through a broker and you have not given voting instructions to the broker, the broker will be prevented from voting shares on non-routine matters, resulting in a “broker non-vote.” Thus, if you do not otherwise instruct your broker, the broker may turn in a proxy card voting your shares on routine matters but expressly instructing that the broker is NOT voting on non-routine matters. Ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal II) contained in this Proxy Statement is considered a routine matter. However, Proposal I is considered a non-routine matter.

Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors (Proposal I) so it is very important that you instruct your broker how to vote with respect to this proposal.

If you share an address with another stockholder and received only one Notice or set of proxy materials and would like to request a separate copy of these materials, please: (1) mail your written request to VirnetX Holding Corporation, P.O. Box 439, Zephyr Cove, Nevada 89448 (Attn: Investor Relations), or (2) call our Investor Relations department at (775) 548-1785. Additional copies of the proxy materials will be sent promptly after receipt of your request. Similarly, you may also contact us if you received multiple copies of the proxy materials and would prefer to receive a single copy in the future.

We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting. We will publish the preliminary, or if available, final, voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC on or before the fourth business day following the date of the Annual Meeting. If not published in an earlier Current Report on Form 8-K, we will publish the final voting results in an amendment to the Current Report on Form 8-K reporting the preliminary voting results within four business days after the final voting results are available. You may obtain a copy free of charge on our website at http://www.virnetx.com , by contacting our Investor Relations Department at (775) 548-1785, or online at www.sec.gov .

Board of Directors, Nominating and Governance Committee,
or name of individual director
c/o Corporate Secretary
VirnetX Holding Corporation
P.O. Box 439
Zephyr Cove, Nevada 89448

Our Secretary will then direct such communications (except for solicitations or other matters unrelated to us) to the relevant director(s).

In addition, the Company’s bylaws establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present certain matters, including the nomination of directors, before an annual meeting of stockholders without including those matters in the Company’s proxy statement. In general, such proposals, including the information required by the Company’s bylaws, must be received by the Company no earlier than January 24, 2019 and no later than February 23, 2019.

If the date of the stockholder meeting is moved more than 30 days before or 60 days after the anniversary of the 2018 annual meeting and less than 60 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, the Company’s advance notice procedure requires that such proposal including certain information, as described in the Company’s bylaws, must be received by the Company not later than the 10th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. Our Bylaws have been publicly filed with the SEC and can be obtained online at www.sec.gov .

If a stockholder fails to give notice of a stockholder proposal as required by our bylaws or other applicable requirements, then the proposal will not be included in the proxy statement for our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the stockholder will not be permitted to present the proposal to the stockholders for a vote at our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

IMPORTANT ADDITIONAL VOTING INFORMATION FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING

Broker Voting

Stockholders who hold shares of the Company through a broker, bank or other nominee receive proxy materials before each stockholder meeting. Your broker is not permitted to vote on your behalf on Proposal I, unless you follow the instructions provided by your broker. For your vote to be counted, you will need to communicate your voting decisions to your broker, bank or other nominee before the date of the stockholder meeting.

Your Participation in Voting the Shares You Own Is Important

Voting your shares is important to ensure that you have a say in the governance of the Company and to fulfill the objectives of the majority voting standard that we apply in the election of directors. Please review the proxy materials and follow the instructions on the proxy card to vote your shares. We hope you will exercise your rights and fully participate as a stockholder in the Company’s future.

More Information Is Available

If you have any questions about the proxy voting process, please contact the broker, bank or other nominee where you hold your shares. The SEC also has a website ( www.sec.gov/spotlight/proxymatters.shtml ) with more information about your rights as a stockholder. Additionally, you may call our Investor Relations department at (775) 548-1785.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board is presently composed of five members: Michael F. Angelo, Gary Feiner, Kendall Larsen, Thomas M. O’Brien and Robert D. Short III, Ph.D. Mr. Larsen serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors.

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that the directors on our Board shall be divided into three classes, with the classes serving for staggered, three-year terms. Currently, we have two Class I directors, two Class II directors and one Class III director. One class is elected each year at the annual meeting of stockholders. The term of each class of directors expires as follows: Class II at the Annual Meeting, Class III at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, and Class I at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders. Each director shall hold office until his successor is elected and qualified or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.

he also held various other positions at SAIC. Prior to SAIC, he worked at ARCO Power Technologies, Inc. (Atlantic Richfield Petroleum), Sperry Corporate Technology Center and Sperry Research Center. He has a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Purdue University along with a M.S. in Mathematics and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Virginia Tech.

As co-inventor on the majority of the patents in the Company’s patent portfolio, Dr. Short brings to the Board extraordinary technical knowledge and a deep understanding of the Company’s business, history and organization and the field of information security.

Continuing Directors
   
Class III Director

Michael F. Angelo has been a director since July 5, 2007. He has been the Chief Security Architect at NetIQ Corporation/Micro Focus, a global, enterprise software company since August 2005. From October 2003 to August 2005, Mr. Angelo was a Security Architect and Manager, Government Engagements SBU with Microsoft Corporation. From July 1989 to October 2003, Mr. Angelo was a Staff Fellow at both Hewlett Packard Company and Compaq Computer Corp. Mr. Angelo also served as Senior Systems Programmer at the John von Neumann National Supercomputer Center from September 1985 to July 1989. He was a Sub-Chairman of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Board of Assessment for Programs/National Research Council responsible for the CISD review for fiscal years 2001 and 2002, and he has been a technology contributor and participant on the U.S. Commerce Department’s Information Systems Technical Advisory Council (ISTAC) from 1999 to the present. Mr. Angelo was named a distinguished lecturer for 2004 and 2005 by Sigma XI, the Scientific Research Society. He currently holds 60 patents, most in the area of security and authentication, and was named the 2003 Inventor of the Year for the City of Houston by the Houston Intellectual Property Lawyers Association. In 2013, he was named to the Information Systems Security Association Hall of Fame. In 2017, he was named as an Information Systems Security Association Fellow.

As a holder of many patents in the fields of security and authentication, and as a result of his long and distinguished industry and scholarly background in the area of computer security and networking, Mr. Angelo brings to the Board critical technical and industry knowledge and expertise. With his extensive industry knowledge and having successfully served in multiple leadership capacities in various types of organizations, Mr. Angelo is uniquely qualified to serve as chair of the Company’s nominating and governance committee.

Class I Directors

Kendall Larsen has been Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer since July 5, 2007 and held the same positions with VirnetX Inc. since its inception in August 2005. Mr. Larsen does not hold director positions with any other reporting or registered investment companies. From April 2003 to July 2005, Mr. Larsen focused on pre-incorporation activities related to VirnetX Inc. From April 2002 to April 2003, Mr. Larsen was a Limited Partner at Osprey Ventures, L.P., a venture fund that makes investments primarily in business and consumer technology companies. From October 2000 to April 2002, he was Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Security Products Division of Phoenix Technologies Ltd., a software and firmware developer, and he has also held senior executive positions over a period of over twenty years at various leading technology companies, including RSA Security, Inc., Xerox Corporation, Rolm/International Business Machines Corporation, Novell, Inc., General Magic, Inc., and Ramp Networks. Mr. Larsen holds a B.S. in Economics from the University of Utah.

With his years of managerial experience, Mr. Larsen brings to the Board demonstrated management ability at senior levels. Mr. Larsen’s day-to-day leadership and intimate knowledge of our business and operations provide the Board with Company-specific experience and expertise. Mr. Larsen’s drive for innovation and excellence position him well to serve as our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Gary Feiner has been a director since 2014. Mr. Feiner has served as President of Feiner Financial, a tax, accounting and planning services company since 1993 and has been employed by Feiner Financial since 1986. Mr. Feiner was selected to serve on the Board because of his breadth of tax, accounting and financial knowledge.

Corporate Governance

Role of the Board

Our directors are appointed to oversee the actions and results of our management. They were selected for their educational background, professional experience, knowledge of our business, integrity, professional reputation, independence, wisdom and ability to represent the best interests of our stockholders. Their responsibilities include but are not limited to:

Board Leadership Structure

The Board believes that the Company’s Chief Executive Officer is best situated to serve as Chairman of the Board because he is the director most familiar with the Company’s business and industry, and most capable of effectively identifying strategic priorities and leading the execution of strategy. Independent directors and management have different perspectives and roles in strategy development. The Company’s independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from outside the Company and industry, while the Chief Executive Officer brings company-specific experience and expertise. The Board believes that the combined role of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer promotes strategy development and execution, and facilitates information flow between management and the Board, which is essential to effective governance.

The Company does not currently have a lead independent director. To ensure effective independent oversight, the Board has designed its leadership structure so that independent directors exercise oversight of the Company’s management and key issues related to strategy and risk. Only independent directors serve on and chair the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and governance committee of the Board. As a result of the Board’s committee system and majority of independent directors, the Board maintains effective oversight of our business operations, including independent oversight of our financial statements, executive compensation, selection of director candidates, and corporate governance programs. Accordingly, we believe that our current leadership structure is appropriate and enhances the Board’s ability to effectively carry out its roles and responsibilities on behalf of our stockholders.

Risk Oversight

Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks that the Company faces, while the Board, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, the Board has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning, as designed. The Board believes that establishing the right “tone at the top” and full and open communication between management and the Board are essential for effective risk management and oversight. Senior management attends Board meetings quarterly and is available to address any questions or concerns raised by the Board on risk management and any other matters. Each quarter, the Board receives presentations from senior management on strategic matters involving our operations. The Board holds strategic planning sessions with senior management to discuss strategies, key challenges, risks and opportunities for the Company.

While the Board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight for the Company, our three Board committees assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to certain areas of risk. The audit committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to risk management in the areas of financial reporting, internal controls and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Our compensation committee assists the

Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks arising from our compensation policies and programs. The nominating and governance committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with Board organization, membership and structure, succession planning for our directors and executive officers, and corporate governance.

Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies

The Company notes that:

The Company’s compensation policies and practices are intended not to foster risk taking above the level of risk associated with the Company’s business model. Accordingly, the Company believes it has a balanced pay and performance program that does not promote excessive risk taking.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics for all employees and directors in accordance with the requirements of Item 406 of Regulation S-K and the NYSE American LLC (formerly NYSE MKT) Company Guide. A copy of our Code of Ethics is available on our website at http://www.virnetx.com in the “Highlights” link in the “Corporate Governance” subcategory under the “Investors” tab, or by writing to us at VirnetX Holding Corporation, P.O. Box 439, Zephyr Cove, Nevada 89448 (Attention: Investor Relations).

We intend to post on our website any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Ethics within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver. We do not anticipate any such amendments or waivers.

Composition of the Board

Mix of Independent Directors and Officer-Directors

The Board has a majority of independent directors and has determined that it is beneficial for us and our stockholders for our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Scientist to also be Board members. Other officers may, from time to time, serve as Board members, but no officer other than the Chief Executive Officer should be expected to be elected to the Board by virtue of his or her office.

Independence Determinations

The Board annually determines the independence of directors based on a review by the directors and the nominating and governance committee. No director is considered independent unless the Board has determined that he or she has no material relationship with the Company, either directly or as a partner, stockholder, or officer of an organization that has a material relationship with the Company.

We have adopted rules for director independence standards of the NYSE American corporate governance listing standards and the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Board has determined that Michael F. Angelo, Gary Feiner and Thomas M. O’Brien meet the aforementioned independence standards.

Board and Committee Meetings and Annual Meeting Attendance

The Board held a total of eight meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and no director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and the committees of which he was a member, except for Dr. Short. Since November 6, 2007, the Board has had a standing audit committee, compensation

committee and nominating and governance committee. Our audit committee charter, compensation committee charter, and nominating and governance committee charter, each as adopted by the Board, are posted on our website at http://www.virnetx.com in the “Highlights” link in the “Corporate Governance” subcategory under the “Investors” tab.

We encourage, but do not require, the Board members to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. All of our current Board members were in attendance for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, except for Mr. O’Brien.

Membership and Independence

Messrs. Angelo, Feiner and O’Brien comprise our nominating and governance committee, with Mr. Angelo serving as the chairman. The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Angelo, Feiner and O’Brien meets the NYSE American requirements for independence. Our nominating and governance committee met three times during fiscal 2017.

Responsibilities

Our nominating and governance committee is responsible for, among other things:

A more detailed description of our nominating and governance committee’s functions can be found in our nominating and governance committee charter at http://www.virnetx.com in the “Highlights” link in the “Corporate Governance” subcategory under the “Investors” tab, or by writing to us at VirnetX Holding Corporation, P.O. Box 439, Zephyr Cove, NV 89448 (Attention: Investor Relations).

Stockholder Recommendations and Nominees

The policy of our nominating and governance committee is to consider properly submitted recommendations for candidates to the Board from stockholders. In evaluating such recommendations, our nominating and governance committee seeks to achieve a balance of experience, knowledge, integrity, and capability on the Board and to address the membership criteria set forth under “Director Qualifications” below. Any stockholder recommendations for

consideration by our nominating and governance committee should include (1) the name, age, business address and residence address of such person, (2) the principal occupation or employment of such person, (3) the class and number of shares of the Company that are beneficially owned by such person, and (4) any other information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (including, without limitation, such person’s written consent to being named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected).

Stockholder recommendations to the Board should be sent to our Corporate Secretary at VirnetX Holding Corporation, PO Box 439, Zephyr Cove, Nevada 89448.

In addition, our Bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for consideration at an annual meeting of stockholders. For a description of the process for nominating directors in accordance with our Bylaws, see “ How do I submit a stockholder proposal for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders ?” of this Proxy Statement and our Bylaws which have been filed with the SEC.

Director Qualifications

Our nominating and governance committee evaluates and recommends candidates for membership on the Board consistent with criteria established by the Board. The Board has not formally established any specific, minimum qualifications that must be met by each candidate for the Board or specific qualities or skills that are necessary for one or more of the members of the Board. However, our nominating and governance committee, when considering a potential candidate, will factor into its determination the following qualities of a candidate, among others: educational background, professional experience, including whether the person is a current or former chief executive officer or chief financial officer of a public company or the head of a division of a large international organization, knowledge of our business, integrity, professional reputation, independence, wisdom, and ability to represent the best interests of our stockholders.

Identification and Evaluation of Nominees for Directors

Our nominating and governance committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for any position on the Board. Our nominating and governance committee regularly assesses the appropriate size and composition of the Board, the needs of the Board, the respective committees of the Board, and the qualifications of candidates in light of these needs. Candidates may come to the attention of the nominating and governance committee through stockholders, management, current members of the Board, or third-party search firms engaged by the nominating and governance committee.

Once the nominating and governance committee has identified a prospective nominee, the nominating and governance committee makes an initial determination as to whether to conduct a full evaluation of the candidate. This initial determination is based on the information provided to the nominating and governance committee concerning the prospective candidate, as well as the nominating and governance committee’s own knowledge of the prospective candidate, which may be supplemented by inquiries to the person making the recommendation or others. If the nominating and governance committee determines, in consultation with other Board members as appropriate, that additional consideration is warranted, it may gather or request the third party search firm to gather additional information about the prospective nominee’s background and experience. The nominating and governance committee then evaluates the prospective nominee, taking into account whether the prospective nominee is independent within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE American and such other factors as it deems relevant, including the current composition of the Board, the balance of management and independent directors, the need for audit committee or compensation committee expertise, the prospective nominee’s qualifications as discussed above, the diversity of the member’s skills and experience in areas that are relevant to the Company’s businesses and activities, and its evaluations of other prospective nominees. In connection with this evaluation, the nominating and governance committee determines whether to interview the prospective nominee and, if warranted, one or more members of the nominating and governance committee and others, as appropriate, conduct interviews in person or by telephone. After completing this process, the nominating and governance committee makes a recommendation to the full Board as to the persons who should be nominated by the Board, and the Board determines the nominees after considering the recommendation and report of the nominating and governance committee. The nominating and governance committee follows the same process and uses the same criteria for evaluating candidates proposed by stockholders, members of the Board, and members of management.

The nominating and governance committee considers diversity as one of a number of factors in identifying nominees for director. It does not, however, have a formal policy in this regard. The nominating and governance committee views diversity broadly to include diversity of experience, skills, and viewpoint as well as traditional diversity concepts such as race or gender.

Audit Committee Matters

Membership and Independence

Messrs. Angelo, Feiner and O’Brien comprise our audit committee, with Mr. O’Brien serving as the chairman. The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Angelo, Feiner and O’Brien satisfies the requirements for independence under the rules and regulations of the NYSE American and the SEC, including the enhanced standards for audit committee members. The Board has also determined that Mr. O’Brien qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in the SEC rules and satisfies the financial sophistication requirements of the NYSE American. Our audit committee met six times during fiscal 2017.

Responsibilities

Our audit committee is responsible for, among other things:

A more detailed description of our audit committee’s functions can be found in our audit committee charter at http://www.virnetx.com in the “Highlights” link in the “Corporate Governance” subcategory under the “Investors” tab, or by writing to us at VirnetX Holding Corporation, PO Box 439, Zephyr Cove, Nevada 89448 (Attention: Investor Relations).

Audit Fees . Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements, including the audit of internal control over financial reporting, review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports, and accounting services in connection with securities offerings.

Audit-Related Fees . Consists of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include consultations in connection with financial accounting and reporting standards.

Tax Fees . Consists of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. We have nothing to report in this line item as we did not engage Farber Hass Hurley LLP to perform tax-related services for the Company.

All Other Fees . We have nothing to report in this line item as we did not engage Farber Hass Hurley LLP to perform services not covered by the preceding three categories.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our audit committee’s policy is to pre-approve all services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. For fiscal 2017, our audit committee pre-approved 100% of all services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. These services include audit services and audit-related services. Our independent registered public accounting firm is required to periodically report to our audit committee regarding the extent of services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval policy. Our audit committee may also delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. Such member(s) must report any such pre-approval to our audit committee at the next scheduled meeting.

Compensation Committee Matters

Membership and Independence

Messrs. Angelo, Feiner and O’Brien comprise our compensation committee, with Mr. Feiner serving as the chairman. The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Angelo, Feiner and O’Brien satisfies the requirements for independence under the rules of the NYSE American, including the enhanced standards for compensation committee members, is a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and is an “outside director,” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Our compensation committee met five times during fiscal 2017.

Responsibilities, Processes and Procedures

Our compensation committee’s responsibilities and primary processes for establishing and overseeing executive compensation include, among other things:

Our Chief Executive Officer generally attends compensation committee meetings and makes recommendations to our compensation committee regarding the amount and form of the compensation of the other executive officers and key employees. He is not present for any of the executive sessions or for any decisions regarding his own compensation.

Except with respect to determining the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, the compensation committee may delegate its authority to a subcommittee thereof and, to the extent permitted by applicable law, the compensation committee may delegate to officers or appropriate supervisory personnel the authority to grant stock awards to non-executive, non-director employees.

Non-employee directors’ compensation is established by the Board upon the recommendation of our compensation committee.

A more detailed description of our compensation committee’s functions can be found in our compensation committee charter at http://www.virnetx.com in the “Highlights” link in the “Corporate Governance” subcategory under the “Investors” tab, or by writing to us at VirnetX Holding Corporation, P.O. Box 439, Zephyr Cove, Nevada 89448 (Attention: Investor Relations).

Stock Compensation of Non-Employee Directors

Consistent with our compensation policy, we provide the following stock compensation for non-employee directors:

The following table shows the compensation earned by or paid to each of our non-employee directors for fiscal 2017:

PROPOSAL I:

ELECTION OF CLASS II DIRECTORS

The Board consists of five members. In accordance with our certificate of incorporation, the Board is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At the Annual Meeting, two Class II directors will be elected for a three-year term to serve until the 2021 annual meeting and until their respective successors are qualified and elected, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal.

Nominees

The nominating and governance committees of the Board recommended, and the Board approved, Thomas M. O’Brien and Robert D. Short III, Ph.D. as the Class II director nominees for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting. If elected, Mr. O’Brien and Dr. Short will serve as directors until our annual meeting in 2021, and until their successors are qualified and elected or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. Both Mr. O’Brien and Dr. Short are current directors of the Company. Please see “Director Nominees” of this Proxy Statement for information concerning Mr. O’Brien and Dr. Short.

Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them FOR Mr. O’Brien and Dr. Short as Class II directors. If a nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for another nominee designated by the Board. We are not aware of any reason that either of the nominees would be unable or unwilling to serve as a director.

Vote Required

The two director nominees receiving the highest number of votes cast by the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting on this matter will be elected to the Board. Votes that are withheld will be excluded entirely and will have no effect in the election of directors.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the election of Thomas M. O’Brien and Robert D. Short III, Ph.D as Class II Directors.

PROPOSAL II:

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The audit committee has selected Farber Hass Hurley LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 and recommends that stockholders vote for ratification of such selection. Although ratification by stockholders is not required by law, the Company has determined that it is desirable to request ratification by the stockholders of this selection. If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of Farber Hass Hurley LLP, the audit committee may reconsider its selection. Notwithstanding its selection or voting results, the audit committee, in its discretion, may appoint a new independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the audit committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Farber Hass Hurley LLP has audited our consolidated financial statements annually since it was first appointed in fiscal year 2007. We expect that representatives of Farber Hass Hurley LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

Vote Required

Ratification of Farber Hass Hurley LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting on this matter. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “against” the ratification of Farber Hass Hurley LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Board of Directors, on behalf of the audit committee, recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the ratification of the selection of Farber Hass Hurley LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.

To achieve these objectives, we implement and maintain compensation plans that tie a substantial portion of each executive officer’s overall compensation to key strategic financial and operational goals, such as revenue-generating activities, product and technical development, corporate public relations and stockholder value creation. The compensation committee’s approach emphasizes the setting of compensation at levels it believes are competitive with executives at other companies of similar size and stage of development who are operating in the information technology industry while taking into account our relative performance, key qualitative factors such as executive performance, criticality and tenure and our own strategic goals.

Executive Compensation Process

Role of the Compensation Committee

We maintain an executive compensation program comprised of multiple elements. The compensation committee typically reviews the elements of compensation for our named executive officers annually. The compensation committee makes all compensation decisions with regard to our Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s other named executive officers. In addition, the compensation committee is responsible for determining for all executive officers: annual base salary, annual incentive bonus, including specific goals, as applicable, and amount, equity compensation, employment agreements, severance arrangements and change in control agreements/provisions, if any, and any other benefits or compensation arrangement; evaluating and recommending to the Board compensation plans, policies, and programs for our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; administering our equity incentive plans; and preparing the compensation committee report that the SEC requires in our annual proxy statement.

Role of the Chief Executive Officer and Management in Compensation Decisions

Our Chief Executive Officer generally attends the compensation committee’s meetings and makes recommendations to the compensation committee regarding the amount and form of the compensation of the other named executive officers and key employees. He is not present for any of the executive sessions or for discussion related to his own compensation.

Compensation Consultant

The compensation committee retains sole authority to hire a compensation consultant, approve its compensation, determine the nature and scope of its services, evaluate its performance, and terminate its engagement.

In fiscal 2017, the compensation committee engaged Compensia to:

Compensation Consultant Independence

The compensation committee has reviewed our relationship with Compensia pursuant to NYSE American and SEC rules and has found no conflict of interest in Compensia continuing to provide advice to the compensation committee. The compensation committee is also regularly advised by our primary outside corporate and compensation and benefits legal counsel, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation (“WSGR”). The compensation committee has reviewed our relationship with WSGR pursuant to NYSE American and SEC rules and has found no conflict of interest in WSGR continuing to provide advice to the compensation committee.

Competitive Data

Our primary business is the development of software and technology solutions for securing real-time communications over the internet. In addition, we hold a valuable intellectual property portfolio from which we have generated revenue, both from licenses and one time payments in settlement of infringement claims by us.

In fiscal 2017, the compensation committee reviewed the Company’s compensation practices in comparison to the compensation practices of certain peer-group companies identified by Compensia in a report provided to the compensation committee in 2015 (the “Compensation Assessment”). As part of the Compensation Assessment, in 2015 the compensation committee and Compensia worked together to determine a group of 20 publicly-traded companies that generally had similar financial, operational and strategic characteristics as the Company. For the Compensation Assessment, our peer group (“Peer Group”) consisted of:

At the time of our Compensation Assessment, these peer companies were generally comparable to the Company with respect to annual revenue (median of $81 million at such time), market capitalization (median of $330 million at such time) and industry (primarily IP-licensing and software and other high-technology industries) to the extent practical taking into consideration our unique business model and financial profile. To assess the competitiveness of our executive compensation program for fiscal 2017, the compensation committee reviewed the data provided by Compensia. As part of this process, in fiscal 2017, Compensia analyzed base salaries, target bonuses and target total cash compensation, annual equity compensation and target total direct compensation for each of our named executive officers, as compared against the Compensation Assessment, and aging the cash compensation data by an additional 3% to reflect current market trends (the “Adjusted Compensation Assessment”). Compensia then presented this information to the compensation committee for its review and use in setting compensation.

Our success largely depends on the skills, experience and efforts of our key personnel, including Mr. Larsen, Dr. Short and Mr. Nance. Generally, the compensation committee seeks to provide compensation for our executive officers that is market competitive and provides incentives for our executive officers to remain with the Company and to drive development in the Company’s business. We do not benchmark our overall total compensation to any specific percentile but instead maintain a flexible approach to setting executive compensation for achieving our objectives. In setting compensation, the compensation committee considers various factors such as Company performance and individual performance, the importance of the officer’s role and the scope of the officer’s responsibilities (for example, job responsibilities that are broader than the specific position may suggest), current executive equity holdings and retention hold and competitive market data provided by Compensia for executives in similar positions. When determining compensation for the named executive officers, the compensation committee took into account that Mr. Nance works on a part-time basis.

In fiscal 2017, the compensation committee approved target total cash compensation levels (both base salary and target annual incentives) and equity compensation that resulted in target total direct compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer that fell at the 40 ^th and 55 ^th percentile, respectively, and for our Chief Technology Officer and Chief Scientist at the 60 ^th percentile, excluding the September Short Grant (as defined below), of our Peer Group from the Adjusted Compensation Assessment.

The compensation committee believes this approach to setting executive compensation is important for driving achievement towards our financial and operational milestones and recognizing the importance of Mr. Larsen, Dr. Short and Mr. Nance to the Company.

Prior Say-on-Pay Advisory Approval

The Company held its most recent say-on-pay advisory vote in fiscal 2017. Over 67% of the stockholder votes cast on the proposal (excluding broker non-votes) were voted in favor of our compensation of our named executive officers. The compensation committee believes these results affirm stockholder support for our executive compensation decisions and policies, and as such, the compensation committee has not materially changed its approach to fiscal 2017 compensation. The compensation committee will continue to consider the results of say-on-pay proposals this year and in the future along with material feedback from periodic shareholder outreach with key investors when making executive compensation policies and decisions.

Elements of Executive Compensation

Our executive compensation program consists of the following elements:

Stock-based awards are made at the commencement of employment, may be made annually based upon performance and, occasionally, following a significant change in job responsibilities or to meet other special retention objectives. The compensation committee reviews and approves stock-based awards to named executive officers based upon a review of competitive compensation data, its assessment of individual performance, a review of each executive’s existing long-term incentives, and retention considerations. In determining the number of stock options and RSUs to be granted to our named executive officers, we take into account the individual’s position, scope of responsibility, ability to affect profits and stockholder value, the individual’s historic and recent performance, the value of stock options and RSUs and percent of company granted in relation to other elements of the individual executive’s total compensation and relative to comparable companies. We expect to continue to use stock options and RSUs as a long-term incentive vehicle, potentially in combination with equity award types, because we believe that stock options and RSUs:

Named Executive Officers’ Compensation Decisions for Fiscal 2017

In fiscal 2017, the compensation committee undertook a full review of the compensation of our named executive officers, and following this review, in June 2017, the compensation committee made the following decisions (as described in greater detail in the sections below):

The compensation for our named executive officers for fiscal 2017 is presented in the table below.

Base Salary

Mr. Larsen is our President and Chief Executive Officer, as well Chairman of the Board. Mr. Larsen, a founder of VirnetX Inc., has driven the organization’s performance, leading it from inception, through the early start-up phase and through several rounds of financing. He has also helped drive significant growth in our revenues and market capitalization, as well as achievement of our operational and strategic milestones. The compensation committee believes that Mr. Larsen is critical to our ability to pursue our licensing strategy going forward. In light of these considerations and the other factors described above, in June 2017, the compensation committee increased Mr. Larsen’s base salary from $583,261 to $618,298, an increase of approximately $35,000, or 6%, over fiscal 2016. With this increase, Mr. Larsen’s base salary exceeded the upper quartile of our Peer Group from the Adjusted

Compensation Assessment, which the compensation committee felt was warranted due to the value Mr. Larsen brings to the Company through his key role in the management of the Company during his long tenure, as well as our successes under his leadership in product development, licensing, and litigation matters.

Dr. Short has significant scientific and technological expertise, and the compensation committee considered his technical, scientific and management skills, his level of responsibility and expected contributions to intellectual property and product development. In light of these considerations and the other factors described above, in June 2017, the compensation committee increased Dr. Short’s base salary from $371,125 to $393,393, an increase of approximately $22,000, or 6%, over fiscal 2016. With this increase, Dr. Short’s base salary also placed him within the upper quartile of our Peer Group from the Adjusted Compensation Assessment on an annualized basis, which the compensation committee believed was appropriate given his long tenure with us and contributions to our business.

Mr. Nance has significant public company experience, and the compensation committee considered his technical and strategic skills, his level of responsibility and expected contributions to our further success. In fiscal 2017, Mr. Nance’s responsibilities and time commitment to the Company increased significantly. Accordingly, in accordance with his appointment as CFO on a part-time basis, the compensation committee approved a base salary of $159,120 for Mr. Nance based on an annual salary of $397,800 adjusted to reflect Mr. Nance’s actual part-time status, which also placed him within the upper quartile of our Peer Group from the Adjusted Compensation Assessment on an annualized basis, which the compensation committee believed was appropriate given his long tenure with us and contributions to our business.

Annual Incentive Bonus

In fiscal 2017, the compensation committee maintained the fiscal 2016 target incentive opportunity percentages for Mr. Larsen, Dr. Short and Mr. Nance at 50% of fiscal 2017 base salary.

In January 2018, the compensation committee reviewed the Company’s performance in fiscal 2017 and the contributions that Mr. Larsen, Dr. Short and Mr. Nance made to such performance. The compensation committee determined to pay each of Mr. Larsen, Dr. Short and Mr. Nance 62.5% of their respective fiscal 2017 base salary in light of the Company’s overall performance for the year, including a significant verdict for the Company in its litigation against Apple and advances in product development for the Company’s line of products, and their contributions in achieving this performance. The compensation committee took into account the achievement of certain licensing and litigation milestones, technical milestones, and development of the Company’s patent portfolio, none of which were given any particular weight or assigned a dollar value. The resulting aggregate fiscal 2017 annual incentive bonus payments paid to Mr. Larsen, Dr. Short and Mr. Nance were $386,436, $245,870 and $99,450, respectively.

Equity Incentive Compensation

On June 2, 2017, the compensation committee approved grants of stock options and restricted stock units to Mr. Larsen, Dr. Short and Mr. Nance and an additional stock option to Dr. Short on September 14, 2017. As part of the compensation review, the compensation committee, with input from Compensia, also reviewed our executive officers’ equity incentive compensation in terms of both annual grant date fair value granted and percent of the Company granted. Based on this review, the Company determined that the Company’s equity compensation grant date fair value in fiscal 2017, excluding the September Short Grant, was at or slightly above the bottom quartile of our Peer Group from the Adjusted Compensation Assessment for Mr. Larsen, Dr. Short and Mr. Nance, and below the bottom quartile on a percent of company granted basis.

In determining fiscal 2017 stock option awards and stock awards for Mr. Larsen, Dr. Short and Mr. Nance, the compensation committee reviewed various factors, including the Company’s performance, each officer’s performance and perceived criticality to future success, peer practices with respect to long-term incentives, and total annual equity allocations at the Company for fiscal 2017.

In addition, after a review of Dr. Short’s overall performance, the Company’s performance and Dr. Short’s equity holdings, including recently expired options that he held, the compensation committee granted Dr. Short an option to purchase 980,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in September 2017. The compensation committee believed this grant was important to provide retention incentives to Dr. Short.

Perquisites

Our named executive officers participate in the same group insurance and employee benefit plans as our other salaried employees. At this time, we do not provide special benefits or other perquisites to our named executive officers.

Severance and Change in Control Arrangements

We do not provide change in control agreements or employment agreements providing formal cash or equity severance rights to any of our named executive officers. Our 2013 Plan allows the Board to determine the terms and condition of awards issued thereunder. The Board has made the determination that all equity awards issued under our 2013 Plan will include the provision that in the event of a “Change in Control” (as defined in our 2013 Plan), all unvested shares underlying the option and all unvested RSUs will vest and become exercisable immediately prior to the consummation of such Change in Control transaction.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have not adopted stock ownership guidelines, and we currently do not require our directors or executive officers to own a particular amount of our Common Stock. The compensation committee is satisfied that stock and option holdings among our directors and executive officers are sufficient at this time to provide ongoing motivation to align this group’s interests with those of our stockholders.

The Company has adopted policies that prohibits employee, officers, directors, and consultants from engaging in any short sale, “sale against the box” or any equivalent transaction involving the Company’s stock. Additionally, the Company’s directors and officers are prohibited from engaging in hedging or derivative transactions, such as “cashless” collars, forward contracts, equity swaps or other similar or related transactions, and all other Company employees and consultants may only engage in such transactions after obtaining approval from the Company’s compliance officer.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

The compensation committee considers the possible tax consequences to the Company and to its executives of our compensation programs, the accounting consequences to the Company of different compensation decisions and the impact of such decisions on stockholder dilution. With respect to the tax consequences to the Company, the compensation committee considers the potential future effects of Section 162(m) on the compensation paid to our named executive officers. Section 162(m) disallows a tax deduction for any publicly held corporation for individual compensation exceeding $1.0 million in any taxable year for the chief executive officer and certain other highly compensated officers. Until recently, remuneration in excess of $1 million may be deducted if, among other things, it qualifies as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m). The exemption from Section 162(m)’s deduction limit for performance-based compensation has been repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid to our covered executive officers in excess of $1.0 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017 that has not been subsequently materially modified.

We follow ASC Topic 718 for our options and stock awards. ASC Topic 718 requires companies to measure the compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including stock options and other stock awards, based on the grant date “fair value” of these awards. This calculation is performed for accounting purposes and reported in the compensation tables below. ASC Topic 718 also requires companies to recognize the compensation cost of their stock-based compensation awards in their income statements over the period that a named executive officer is required to render service in exchange for the option or other award.

In approving the amount and form of compensation for our named executive officers, our compensation committee may consider all elements of the cost to us of providing such compensation, including the potential impact of Section 162(m) and accounting consequences. However, to maintain maximum flexibility in designing compensation programs, the compensation committee will not limit compensation to those levels or types of compensation that are intended to be deductible or that lead to a particular accounting result or level of stockholder dilution.

Risk Assessment

The compensation committee structures our executive and other compensation programs in a manner that it believes does not promote inappropriate risk taking by our executive officers, but rather encourages management to take a balanced approach, focused on achieving our corporate goals. The Company’s compensation programs were reviewed by the compensation committee and determined not to create inappropriate or excessive risk that is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

As stated elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, we do not provide change in control agreements or employment agreements providing formal cash or equity severance rights to any of our named executive officers. However, the Board has made the determination that all equity awards issued under our 2013 Plan will include the provision that in the event of a “Change in Control” (as defined in our 2013 Plan), all unvested shares underlying the option and all unvested RSUs will vest and become exercisable immediately prior to the consummation of such Change in Control transaction.

The table below provides an estimate of the value of the equity awards that will vest and become immediately exercisable prior to the consummation of such Change in Control transaction for each of our named executive officers for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, assuming that the change in control was effective on December 31, 2017. The amounts reported in the table reflect the aggregate market value of the unvested shares of our common stock underlying outstanding stock options and restricted stock unit awards.

CEO PAY RATIO

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”), we are providing the following disclosure that compares the annual total compensation of our “median employee” to the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Larsen.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. The SEC’s rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported below, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates that we used were as follows:

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors and ten percent stockholders to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. The same persons are required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company during fiscal 2017 and written representations regarding Forms 5 provided to the Company, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements have been met.

to other employees in similar positions of responsibility at comparable companies. During fiscal 2017, Corby Hoback received an aggregate of $216,112 in the form of salary and bonus, $34,375 in the form of option grants and $32,082 in the form of stock awards. In February 2018, Corby Hoback received $84,300 in the form of option grants and $81,000 in the form of stock awards.

During fiscal 2017, the Company leased the use of an aircraft from K2 Investment Fund LLC (“LLC”) for business travel for employees of the Company. The Company incurred approximately $1,240,000 in rental fees (including fees and other reimbursements) to the LLC during fiscal 2017 for such use. Kendall Larsen and Kathleen Larsen are the sole member-managers of the LLC and control the equity interests of the LLC. On January 31, 2017 the Company entered into a 12-month non-exclusive lease with the LLC for use of the plane at a rate of $8,100 per flight hour, with no minimum usage requirement. The agreement contains other terms and conditions normal in such transactions and can be cancelled by either the Company or the LLC with 30-days’ notice. The audit committee has approved the rental fees and lease agreement.

OTHER BUSINESS

The Board is not aware of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If, however, any other matter should properly come before the Annual Meeting, the enclosed proxy card confers discretionary authority with respect to such matter.

AVAILABILITY OF FORM 10-K

We will provide upon request without charge to each person solicited by this Proxy Statement a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017, including our financial statements but excluding the exhibits to Form 10-K. The Form 10-K includes a list of the exhibits that were filed with it, and we will furnish a copy of any such exhibit to any person who requests it upon the payment of our reasonable expenses in providing the requested exhibit. For further information, please send a request to: Secretary, VirnetX Holding Corporation, PO Box 439, Zephyr Cove, NV 89448, telephone (775) 548-1785. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other filings with the SEC, including exhibits, are also available for free online at http://www.virnetx.com under the “SEC Filings” link in the “Investors” tab and at the SEC’s internet site, http://www.sec.gov .

ANNUAL MEETING INSTRUCTIONS

Attendance at the Annual Meeting is limited to stockholders of record as of April 2, 2018. Registration will begin at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time on May 24, 2018, and each stockholder will need proof of identification with valid picture identification such as a driver’s license or passport and verification of stock ownership as of April 2, 2018.

The use of cell phones, smartphones, pagers, recording and photographic equipment and/or computers is not permitted in the meeting room at the Annual Meeting.

See below for driving directions.

DRIVING DIRECTIONS TO ANNUAL MEETING

MontBleu Resort Casino & Spa - South Lake Tahoe
55 Highway 50
Stateline, Nevada 89449
(800) 829-7630

Driving Directions

From Sacramento (Route #1 Hwy-50):

From Sacramento or San Francisco (Route #2 - I-80):

From Reno: