Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
¨
Yes
x
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
¨
Yes
x
No
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x
Yes
¨
No
Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
x
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
x
Indicate by checkmark if registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
¨
Yes
x
No
The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of June 30, 2017, was approximately $190,010,016 based on the closing sales price of the common stock on such date as reported on the OTCQB Marketplace operated by the OTC Markets Group, Inc.
On March 21, 2018 we had 23,951,252 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) issued and outstanding.
Certain statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are “forward-looking statements” regarding the plans and objectives of management for future operations. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements of CURE Pharmaceutical Holding Corp. to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. The Company’s plans and objectives are based, in part, on assumptions involving the continued expansion of business. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Although the Company believes its assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance the forward-looking statements included in this report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein particularly in view of the current state of our operations, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a statement by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth herein under the headings “Description of Business”. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements unless required by law.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
.
Market Information
The Company’s common stock is listed on the “OTC Markets” under the Symbol “CURR”. Trading in stocks quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board is often thin and is characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices due to many factors that may be unrelated to a company’s operations or business prospects. We cannot assure you that there will be a market in the future for our common stock.
OTC Bulletin Board securities are not listed or traded on the floor of an organized national or regional stock exchange. Instead, OTC Bulletin Board securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting dealers in stocks. OTC Bulletin Board issuers are traditionally smaller companies that do not meet the financial and other listing requirements of a regional or national stock exchange.
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
5.10
|
|
|
$
|
1.40
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
8.02
|
|
|
$
|
4.30
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
6.50
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
8.70
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
Our shares of common stock began trading on January 18, 2017.
Number of Holders
As of December 31, 2017, the 23,901,252 issued and outstanding shares of common stock were held by a total of 99 shareholders of record.
Penny Stock
The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a market price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, that: (a) contains a description of the nature and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading; (b) contains a description of the broker’s or dealer’s duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation of such duties or other requirements of the securities laws; (c) contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask price; (d) contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions; (e) defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and (f) contains such other information and is in such form, including language, type size and format, as the SEC shall require by rule or regulation.
The broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock, the customer with (a) bid and offer quotations for the penny stock; (b) the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction; (c) the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the market for such stock; and (d) a monthly account statement showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account.
In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement as to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement.
These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity for our Common Stock. Therefore, stockholders may have difficulty selling our securities.
Dividends
The Company has never paid cash dividends on its common stock. We intend to keep future earnings, if any, to finance the expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate that any cash dividends will be paid in the foreseeable future. The registrant’s future payment of dividends will depend on the registrant’s earnings, capital requirements, expansion plans, financial condition and other relevant factors that the registrant’s board of directors may deem relevant. The registrant’s accumulated deficit currently limits the registrant’s ability to pay dividends.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
On December 27, 2017, the Company held a special meeting of stockholders (the “Meeting”) at the Company’s corporate office located at 1620 Beacon Place, Oxnard, California 93033. At the Meeting, the stockholders voted on the various proposals, including the Company’s 2017 Equity incentive plan, described in detail in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Meeting filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 13, 2017. The Company’s 2017 Equity Incentive Plan was approved and the voting results are disclosed in the Company’s Form 8-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2017.
The Company does not have any individual compensation arrangements with respect to its common or preferred stock. The issuance of any of our common or preferred stock is within the discretion of our Board of Directors, which has the power to issue any or all of our authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
On April 7, 2017, the Company issued 14,579 common stock shares at $6.86 per share for consulting services to be performed over a one year period.
On April 24, 2017, the Company issued 100,000 common stock shares at $7.00 per share for consulting services to be performed over a six month period.
On May 18, 2017, the Company issued 300,000 common stock shares at $2.10 per share for consulting services to be performed over a one year period.
On August 21, 2017, the Company issued 100,000 common stock shares at $5.30 per share for consulting services to be performed over a four month period.
The shares of common stock described above were issued without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) in reliance on the exemptions provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act promulgated thereunder and in reliance on similar exemptions under applicable state laws.
From May 11, 2017 to December 14, 2017, the Company issued 360,000 warrants in connection with the issuance of $1,800,000 convertible promissory notes. The warrants have an exercise price of the lower of $7.00 per share or the price per share in the Company’s latest debt or equity financing greater than $3,000,000 and a term of 3 years.
From May 11, 2017 to December14, 2017, the Company issued up to $1,900,000 convertible promissory notes due between November 11, 2017 and June 14, 2018. The notes bear interest at 8% per year and are convertible into common stock at the lower of $7.00 per share or the price per share in the Company’s latest debt or equity financing greater than $3,000,000.
On October 30, 2017, the Company issued 50,000 common stock shares at $3.50 per share for consulting services to be performed over a one year period.
Purchase of Our Equity Securities by Officers and Directors
None
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
.
Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
.
The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition of CURE Pharmaceutical Holding Corp., a Nevada corporation for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of CURE Pharmaceutical Holding Corp., and the notes to those financial statements that are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. This discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as CURE Pharmaceutical Holding Corp.’s plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth under the Business sections in this Form 10-K. Words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” and similar expressions are used to identify forward-looking statements.
BUSINESS
CURE Pharmaceutical Holding Corp. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on May 15, 2014. The Company was formerly named Makkanotti Group Corp. which was formed to engage in the business of manufacturing food paper bags in Nicosia, Cyprus.
On November 7, 2016, the board of directors and the majority stockholder of the then outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock executed a written consent to change the registrant’s name to CURE Pharmaceutical Holdings Corp. from Makkanotti Group Corp. The Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation was filed with the State of Nevada on November 30, 2016.
CURE Pharmaceutical Corporation
Our wholly owned subsidiary and operating business, CURE Pharmaceutical, located in Oxnard, California was originally incorporated in July 2011 to develop novel drug formulation and delivery technologies.
The pharmaceutical industry is facing ever-growing R&D expenditure and fewer new drug approvals as a result of increasing regulation, a failure to predict safety problems or a lack of efficacy early in a drug’s development, and high investment in new technologies to improve the speed and accuracy of drug development. In addition to these challenges to the industry’s operators, many leading drugs are coming off-patent, creating a need to fill revenue gaps. The pharmaceutical industry is also challenged by the many patients who do not adhere to a regime of prescription drugs because of side effects, difficulty in administration or the taste of a drug. According to HealthPrize and Capgemini, the loss of global revenues by drug makers due to non-adherence to medicines is $630 billion every year.
Improved formulations can address these many challenges by cutting down development costs, reducing the time to market, extending product patent protection, improving patient compliance and increasing drug efficacy. For example, reformulation can enable drug repositioning, the process of finding new uses for failed drugs, such as those abandoned for lack of efficacy after Phase II trials, or marketed drugs for which new uses will extend patent life and, therefore, profitability.
The FDA approves more reformulations than new chemical entities (NCEs) each year under Section (505)(b)(2) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, (“505(b)(2)”) the FDA. The number of 2017 NDA approvals that used the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway rose dramatically from 45 approvals in each of the last two years to an all-time high of 63 in 2017. Under Section (505)(b)(2), the FDA may grant market exclusivity for a term of up to three years of exclusivity following approval of a listed drug that contains previously approved active ingredients but is approved in a new dosage, dosage form, route of administration or indication for use. Taken together, the exclusivity period of a drug and the lower R&D cost for reformulating a drug, have led to pharmaceutical companies taking a keen interest in reformulating their drugs as part of their lifecycle management protocols.
The veterinary industry, which is under pressure to acquire new products and revenue streams, will benefit from similar formulation-focused commercial strategies, addressing a significant need for improved ease of administration by animal caregivers and handlers.
Our Product
CUREFilm™ Technology
The founders of CURE Pharmaceuticals are pioneers in drug delivery and oral thin film (OTF), having launched the first therapeutic OTF product, Chloraseptic® relief strips in 2003. OTF products are about the size of a postage stamp and can deliver medicines through the mucosal tissue in the mouth, sublingually or buccally – on the cheek or via the gastrointestinal tract. Oral transmucosal drug delivery is a non-invasive route for drug delivery that allows for absorption directly into the vascularized tissue in the mouth, bypassing the hepatic first pass effect. This leads to reduced drug exposure, and can offer a rapid onset of action. As an OTF, pharmaceutical actives can be either pre-solubilized or encapsulated, or both for more effective GI absorption and/or sustained release. The quick dissolution nature of OTF means that no water is required for administration, improving patient compliance - especially among the elderly, children, and in conditions where patients have difficulty in swallowing.
The CUREfilm platform is a scalable and versatile formulation and drug delivery system for both oral (OTF) and transdermal (skin) delivery. CUREfilm formulations can improve or match the pharmacokinetics of drugs in accordance with the desired outcome. The platform is compatible with a broad spectrum of molecules, for the formulation of both investigational and marketed prescription, OTC and nutraceutical products.
The competitive advantages of the CUREfilm platform over other OTF technology are protected by issued and pending patents, as well as trade secrets, and are as follows:
|
|
1.
|
A dual layer approach with a liquid-based film layer and a powder matrix layer. The powder composition which may include an active ingredient, can be used to modulate the mucoadhesiveness of the film as well as the dissolution and absorption rates of the medicament. This approach protects the active ingredient from high shear and heat which can degrade the drug.
|
|
|
2.
|
Micro-encapsulation of drug actives that allows for loading higher amounts of an active ingredient, such that we can deliver lower potency drugs in a single dose. By extension, multiple actives can be loaded onto a single dose. The micro-encapsulation process, envelopes all or part the active ingredients with microscopic particles or droplets to protect and shield them. This technique allows the delivery of higher dosing with better flavor masking, increase stability of the active ingredient as well sustained drug release.
|
|
|
3.
|
Proprietary equipment design and manufacturing processes, pursued as trade secrets, allow us to produce CUREfilm products at commercial scale in a cGMP environment.
|
Business Strategy
Our commercial strategy is designed to mitigate risk by pursuing a diversified model.
|
|
1.
|
Nutraceuticals. We manufacture select nutraceuticals that complement our portfolio and align with our mission, in partnership with distributors. This approach provides us with short term revenue opportunities.
|
|
|
2.
|
Pharmaceuticals. We partner with companies that are responsible for clinical development and regulatory approval with the FDA and/or other regulatory bodies, as well as for the marketing and distribution of the products. On a case-by-case basis, we may be responsible for providing all or part of the documentation required for regulatory submissions and for conducting the preclinical testing of our products. Deal terms may include upfront licensing fees, development costs, milestone payments and exclusive manufacturing rights. Within this category, we are further diversifying risk and return by pursuing product life cycle opportunities (e.g. Sildenafil CUREfilm) as well as investigational drugs (e.g. PEA & Dronabinol combination CUREfilm). While we currently manufacture nutraceutical products in our state-of-the-art cGMP oral film manufacturing facility, we are undertaking steps to manufacture pharmaceutical products for commercial use.
|
|
|
3.
|
Cannabinoids. We are specifically investing in pharmaceutical-grade cannabinoid products, such as tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). The oral bioavailability of cannabinoids is very low due to extensive “first-pass” metabolism. Consequently, potency and release times are unpredictable and inconsistent. Moreover, cannabinoids don’t readily dissolve in water which adds to dosing difficulties and discrepancies. In addition to improving bioavailability, CUREfilm enables the loading of combinations of cannabinoids and other plant extracts that, together, provide maximum therapeutic benefit. We are investing in preclinical cannabinoid research at the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, where the laboratory of Dr. Dedi Meiri is identifying specific combinations of cannabinoids with anti-tumor effects. We are undertaking steps to research scheduled drugs at our Oxnard facility.
|
|
|
4.
|
Underserved patient populations. Consistent with our mission of improving the lives of all people in need, regardless of geography or economic status, we have made our technology available to a private company, Oak Therapeutics (“Oak”), that is developing novel drug formulations for patients in developing nations (“Territory”). On November 10, 2017, we received 269,000 shares of Oak as consideration for an exclusive license to our patents rights in the Territory, along with a royalty-free non-exclusive license to any improvements made by Oak. As a result of this transaction, we own approximately 63% of Oak’s outstanding shares and have consolidated Oak’s financial statements as of the fourth quarter 2017. Oak has completed a Phase I Small Business Innovative Research Contract (“SBIR”) from the National Institutes of Health to develop a formulation for 300mg of Isoniazid in a rapidly dissolving film as an anti-tuberculosis treatment option. Oak is currently in the application process for Phase II of the SBIR program to continue its research and development and focus on manufacturing scale up, clinical trials and commercialization.
|
Office
Our corporate office is located at 1620 Beacon Place, Oxnard, California 93033. Our phone number is (805) 824-0410.
RESULTS
Revenues
Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $180,404, an increase from $84,165 generated in the year ended December 31, 2016. Revenues have increased by $96,239 in the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was due to the increase in sales to one customer for our Sleep OTF product and we expect to see a larger increase in 2018 as well. In addition, the Company completed two research and development deals with two customers during the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company did not generate this type of revenue in the year ended December 31, 2016.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold was $180,629 in the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $153,330 in the year ended December 31, 2016. Cost of goods sold increased by $27,299 in the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company incurred higher sales in both compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 resulting in higher cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 amounted to $5,914,514, and for year ended December 31, 2016 amounted to $3,103,710. For the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, selling, general and administrative expenses were mainly comprised of amortization, commission, insurance, payroll, consulting, marketing, public company expenses, legal, accounting, facility rent and travel expenses. The increase in the selling, general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 was due to the increase in payroll as well as noncash transactions relating to amortization of common stock issued for consulting services, commissions and recording the fair value of warrants issued for services totaling $3,143,805. In addition, the Company increased our marketing expenses during the year-ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 as we began to rebrand the Company
Research and Development Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2017, research and development expenses increased to $1,427,341 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 of $753,369. As the Company was able to raise funds during 2016 and 2017 by issuing convertible promissory notes, we were able to continue to focus on spending to improve our intellectual property. At the same time the Company focused on developing potential partnerships with pharmaceutical and bioscience companies and new OTC and prescription products. This is evident by our research and development deals for the development of a Sildenafil CUREfilm and a PEA and Dronabinol combination CUREfilm as well as our investment in preclinical cannabinoid research at the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, where the laboratory of Dr. Dedi Meiri is identifying specific combinations of cannabinoids with anti-tumor effects. In addition, our subsidiary Oak Therapeutics, Inc. has completed a Phase I Small Business Innovative Research Contract (“SBIR”) from the National Institutes of Health to develop a formulation for 300mg of Isoniazid in a rapidly dissolving film as an anti-tuberculosis treatment option. Oak is currently in the application process for Phase II of the SBIR program to continue its research and development and focus on manufacturing scale up, clinical trials and commercialization.
Other Income/Expenses
Other income/expenses for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 amounted to $821,588 and $231,236, respectively. The increase of $590,352 is mainly due to the company recording the change in derivative liability of $742,109 offset by the increase in interest expense of $1,460,612 due to the Company recording the amortization of beneficial conversion features and fair value of warrants issued.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2017, our total assets were $2,099,885 comprised of cash of $108,249, accounts receivable of $4,364, inventory of $44,996, prepaid expenses and other assets of $586,888, net property equipment of $337,361, net intangibles of $900,472 and other assets of $117,555. Our total liabilities were $4,089,071 comprised of accounts payable of $544,980, accrued expenses of $129,978, current portion of loan and note payables of $850,425, current portion of convertible promissory notes of $1,551,488, derivative liability of $90,738, deferred revenue of $361,462, and license fees of $560,000.
As of December 31, 2016, our total assets were $2,835,092 comprised of cash of $1,106,142, accounts receivable of $7,049, inventory of $81,285, prepaid expenses and other assets of $223,879, net property equipment of $370,648, net intangibles of $894,510, and other assets of $151,579. Our total liabilities were $1,118,039 comprised of accounts payable of $265,386, accrued expenses of $26,305, current portion of loan and note payables of $83,277, current portion of capital lease payable of $9,453, deferred revenue of $173,618, and license fees of $560,000.
Cash flows used in operating activities
For the year ended December 31, 2017, operating activities consumed $3,555,668 of cash. This was primarily the result of a net loss of $8,149,885, offset by depreciation and amortization of $164,596, amortization of warrants granted for discount of convertible promissory notes of $535,195, warrants granted for commission expense $832,000, amortization of prepaid stock-based compensation of $2,311,805, amortization of loan discounts of $953,179 and the change in derivative liability of $742,109 as well as the changes in prepaid expenses and other assets of $104,091, accounts payable of $279,594, accrued expenses of $102,882 and deferred revenue of $187,844.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, operating activities consumed $3,516,430 of cash. This was primarily the result of a net loss of $4,157,480, offset by depreciation and amortization of $172,608 and warrants granted for services of $607,906 as well as the changes in inventory of $110,180, prepaid expenses and other assets of $185,757, and accounts payable of $298,204.
Cash flows used in investing activities
Investment activities used an additional $88,920 of cash during the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to cash from the acquisition of Oak Therapeutics of $65,702, payments for patents and costs associated in the development and improvement of our intellectual property of $49,480, investment in joint venture of $5,000 and acquisition of property and equipment of $100,142.
Investment activities used an additional $206,767 of cash during the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to payments for patents and costs associated in the development and improvement of our intellectual property of $45,930, payment for a note receivable of $18,290, investment in joint venture of $20,421 and acquisition of property and equipment of $122,126.
Cash flows provided by financing activities
Financing activities provided $2,646,695 of cash for the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily as the result of proceeds from the issuance of convertible promissory notes of $2,855,549 and repayments of convertible promissory note and loan payables of $199,401 and capital lease payments of $9,453.
Financing activities provided $4,815,987 of cash for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily as the result of proceeds from the issuance of convertible promissory notes of $5,855,575 and repayments of convertible promissory note and loan payables of $1,039,588.
The financial statements in this Form 10-K are presented on the basis that the Company is a going concern. Going concern contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business over a year from the date of the financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2017.
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our Company’s results of operations.
CRITICAL ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
The preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to receivables and accrued expenses. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable based on the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements include estimates as to the appropriate carrying value of the Company’s intangible assets, the amount of stock compensation, and the amount of accrued liabilities that are not readily attainable from other sources. These accounting policies are described at relevant sections in this discussion and analysis and in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The SEC has defined a company’s critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of the company’s financial condition and results of operations, and which require the company to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, we have identified the critical accounting policies and judgments addressed below. We also have other key accounting policies, which involve the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that are significant to understanding our results. For additional information, see Note 2 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”. Although we believe that our estimates, assumptions, and judgments are reasonable, they are based upon information presently available. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions, judgments, or conditions.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets include equipment and intangible assets other than those with indefinite lives. We assess the carrying value of our long-lived asset groups when indicators of impairment exist and recognize an impairment loss when the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable when compared to undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset.
Indicators of impairment include significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in our use of the assets or in our business strategy, loss of or changes in customer relationships and significant negative industry or economic trends. When indications of impairment arise for a particular asset or group of assets, we assess the future recoverability of the carrying value of the asset (or asset group) based on an undiscounted cash flow analysis. If carrying value exceeds projected, net, undiscounted cash flows, an additional analysis is performed to determine the fair value of the asset (or asset group), typically a discounted cash flow analysis, and an impairment charge is recorded for the excess of carrying value over fair value. The Company did not write off any patents during the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company wrote off $58,522 of patents during the year ended December 31, 2016.
Going Concern
The Company has an accumulated deficit balance as of December 31, 2017 and net loss during the year ended December 31, 2017; the Company’s financial statements are prepared using U.S. GAAP applicable to a going concern for the next twelve months from the date of this filing, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it establishes a revenue stream and becomes profitable. The Company is continually analyzing its current costs and is attempting to make additional cost reductions where possible. We expect that we will continue to generate losses from operations throughout 2018.
In order to continue as a going concern and to develop a reliable source of revenues, and achieve a profitable level of operations the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plans to continue as a going concern include raising additional capital through borrowing and/or sales of equity and debt securities. However, management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.
Specifically, management has identified that a minimum of $4,000,000 of capital is needed over the next 12 months in order sustain operations. These capital needs take into account, among other things, management’s plans to advance intellectual property, maintenance of patents, upgrades for manufacturing and to hire personnel for business development. Management has outlined a plan to raise $8,000,000 to $10,000,000 in capital over the next 12 months through either the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock to accredited investors or issuance of convertible promissory notes to accredited investors. Management believes that the capital raised through these methods will be sufficient to sustain operations for the next 12 months. However, the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty at this time.
The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets and liabilities that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments, approximate their fair values. These financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and notes payable. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for these financial instruments because they are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values or they are receivable or payable on demand.
The Company uses fair value measurements under the three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follows:
|
|
·
|
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value.
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which requires, among other things, that entities measure equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Under the standard, entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized holding gains and losses on equity securities classified today as available for sale as a component of other comprehensive income. For equity investments without readily determinable fair values the cost method of accounting is also eliminated, however subject to certain exceptions, entities will be able to elect to record equity investments without readily determinable fair values at cost, less impairment and plus or minus adjustments for observable price changes, with all such changes recognized in earnings. This new standard does not change the guidance for classifying and measuring investments in debt securities and loans. The standard is effective for us on July 1, 2018 (the first quarter of our 2019 fiscal year). The Company is currently evaluating the anticipated impact of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 affects any entity that enters into a lease, with some specified scope exemptions. The guidance in this Update supersedes Topic 840, Leases. The core principle of Topic 842 is that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For public companies, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-02 on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)
that clarifies how to apply revenue recognition guidance related to whether an entity is a principal or an agent. ASU 2016-08 clarifies that the analysis must focus on whether the entity has control of the goods or services before they are transferred to the customer and provides additional guidance about how to apply the control principle when services are provided and when goods or services are combined with other goods or services. The effective date for ASU 2016-08 is the same as the effective date of ASU 2014-09 as amended by ASU 2015-14, for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. The Company does not anticipate a significant impact upon adoption.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation, or ASU No. 2016-09. The areas for simplification in this Update involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. Amendments related to the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized, minimum statutory withholding requirements, forfeitures, and intrinsic value should be applied using a modified retrospective transition method by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period in which the guidance is adopted. Amendments related to the presentation of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares to meet the minimum statutory withholding requirement should be applied retrospectively. Amendments requiring recognition of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies in the income statement and the practical expedient for estimating expected term should be applied prospectively. An entity may elect to apply the amendments related to the presentation of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows using either a prospective transition method or a retrospective transition method. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-09 on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing
, which provides further guidance on identifying performance obligations and improves the operability and understandability of licensing implementation guidance. The effective date for ASU 2016-10 is the same as the effective date of ASU 2014-09 as amended by ASU 2015-14, for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. The Company does not anticipate a significant impact upon adoption.
FASB ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” was issued in June 2016 and clarifies the objective of the collectability criterion, presentation of taxes collected from customers, non-cash consideration, contract modifications at transition, completed contracts at transition and how guidance in Topic 606 is retrospectively applied. The amendments do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606. The effective dates are the same as those for Topic 606.
FASB ASU 2014-12, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period” was issued June 2014. This guidance was issued to resolve diversity in accounting for performance targets. A performance target in a share-based payment that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period should be accounted for as a performance condition and should not be reflected in the award’s grant date fair value. Compensation cost should be recognized over the required service period, if it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those annual periods. This update did not have a significant impact upon early adoption.
FASB ASU 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” was issued September 2014. This provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ASU applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not anticipate a significant impact upon adoption.
FASB ASU 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” was issued in July 2015. This requires entities to measure most inventory “at the lower of cost and net realizable value,” thereby simplifying the current guidance under which an entity must measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. The ASU will not apply to inventories that are measured by using either the last-in, first-out method or the retail inventory method. For public business entities, the ASU is effective prospectively for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein. Upon transition, entities must disclose the nature of and reason for the accounting change. The Company does not anticipate a significant impact upon adoption.
FASB ASU No. 2015-15, Interest—Imputation of Interest: Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements” was issued in August 2015 which permits an entity to report deferred debt issuance costs associated with a line-of-credit arrangement as an asset and to amortize such costs over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings under the credit line. The ASU applies to all entities and is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The guidance should be applied on a retrospective basis. The Company does not anticipate a significant impact upon adoption.
FASB ASU 2015-17, “Income Taxes Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” was issued in November 2015. This requires entities to classify deferred tax liabilities and assets as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position and applies to all entities that present a classified statement of financial position. For public entities, this update is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company does not anticipate a significant impact upon adoption.
FASB ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326)” was issued in June 2016. This ASU amends the Board’s guidance on the impairment of financial instruments. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses, which the FASB believes will result in more timely recognition of such losses. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption will be permitted. The Company does not anticipate a significant impact upon adoption.
ECONOMY AND INFLATION
Except as disclosed herein, we have not experienced any significant cancellation of orders due to the downturn in the economy and only a small number of customers requested delays in delivery or production of orders in process. Our management believes that inflation has not had a material effect on our results of operations.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET AND CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS
We do not have any off-balance sheet or contractual arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, and results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
.
Not Applicable.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
.
Our consolidated financial statements and the related notes begin on Page F-1, which are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
.
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our principal executive and principal financial officers have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a – 15(e) and 15d – 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required under the SEC’s rules and forms and that the information is gathered and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(c) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(t) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
1.
|
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of our management and directors; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. Based on this assessment, management concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting as a result of the identified material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting described below. In making this assessment, management used the framework set forth in the report entitled Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO. The COSO framework summarizes each of the components of a company’s internal control system, including (i) the control environment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii) control activities, (iv) information and communication and (v) monitoring.
Identified Material Weakness
A material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement or the financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Management identified the segregation of duties as a material weakness during its assessment of internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017: As of December 31, 2017, we had one full-time employee with the requisite expertise in the key functional areas of finance and accounting. As a result, there is a lack of proper segregation of duties necessary to insure that all transactions are accounted for accurately and in a timely manner. As our resources allow, we will add financial personnel to our management team.
(b) Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2017 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to have a materially affect, on our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
.
Our executive officers, directors and significant employees and their ages and their respective positions as of December 31, 2017 were as follows:
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Robert Davidson
|
|
50
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Edward Maliski
|
|
69
|
|
Chief Scientific Officer, President
|
|
Wayne Nasby(1)
|
|
56
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
Mark Udell
|
|
40
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
|
|
Jessica Rousset(2)
|
|
41
|
|
Chief Business Officer
|
|
William Yuan
|
|
57
|
|
Director
|
|
Charles Berman
|
|
74
|
|
Director
|
|
Alan Einstein
|
|
52
|
|
Director
|
|
|
1.
|
Wayne Nasby resigned as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer effective January 21, 2018.
|
|
|
2.
|
Jessica Rousset was also appointed the Company’s Chief Operating Officer effective January 22, 2018.
|
Officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors (subject to the terms of any employment agreement), at our annual meeting, to hold such office until an officer’s successor has been duly appointed and qualified, unless an officer sooner dies, resigns or is removed by the Board.
Background of Executive Officers and Directors
The following is a brief account of the education and business experience of the incoming directors and executive officers during at least the past five years, indicating the person’s principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which he or she was employed.
Robert Davidson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Robert Davidson has served as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of CURE Pharmaceutical since July 2011. Prior to his role at CURE Pharmaceutical, Mr. Davidson served as President and Chief Executive Officer of InnoZen Inc., Chief Executive Officer of Gel Tech LLC, Chief Executive Officer of Bio delivery Technologies Inc., and Director of HealthSport Inc. Mr. Davidson was responsible for the development of several drug delivery technologies and commercial brand extensions. He has worked with brands such as Chloraseptic™, Suppress™, as well as Pediastrip™, a private label electrolyte oral thin film sold in major drug store chains. Mr. Davidson is also considered an industry expert leader in OTF technology. Mr. Davidson received his B.S. degree with a concentration in Biological Life Sciences from the University of the State of New York, Excelsior College. He has a Masters Certificate in Applied Project Management from Villanova University, Masters of Public Health from American Military University, Virginia and a Masters in Health and Wellness from Liberty University, Virginia. Mr. Davidson is also a Certified Performance Enhancement Specialist and Fitness Nutrition Specialist through the National Academy of Sports Medicine and attended Post-Graduate Studies at the University of Cambridge. Mr. Davidson’s experience as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, and his extensive knowledge of OTF and drug delivery technologies qualifies him to serve on our Board.
Edward Maliski, PhD – President and Chief Science Officer
Dr. Edward Maliski has served as the President, Chief Science Officer and Director of CURE Pharmaceutical since July 2011. Dr. Maliski is an accomplished research scientist with 30 years of experience in the development of pharmaceutical and biotechnology products. As an executive leader and strategist, Dr. Maliski contributed his expertise in project management and chemical research to facilitate the transfer of new discoveries into pharmaceutical products for the Sterling Winthrop Research Institute, Glaxo Research Institute, Merck & Co., and Amgen Inc. Additionally, Dr. Maliski has worked with several successful start-up companies.
Wayne Nasby – Chief Operating Officer
Wayne Nasby had served as the Chief Operating Officer and director of Cure Pharmaceutical from July 2011 until January 21, 2018. He has over 30 years of experience in the healthcare industry and has been recognized by industry and regulatory leaders for his proven track record in cGMP pharmaceutical regulatory compliance and innovation. Prior to Cure Pharmaceutical, Mr. Nasby served as the Vice President of Operations at InnoZen, Inc. He also served in various management positions at Amgen Inc. within quality assurance, supply chain, and corporate project management. During his twenty year tenure at Amgen, Inc., Mr. Nasby also established and directed distribution of pharmaceutical products to Asia, Australia, Europe and Puerto Rico.
Mark Udell, CPA – Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Mark Udell has served as the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of CURE Pharmaceutical since July 2011. He is a Certified Public Accountant with over 17 years of experience in finance and accounting. Prior to joining the Company in 2011, Mr. Udell served as InnoZen, Inc.’s Chief Accounting Officer and Controller and was responsible for establishing, monitoring and enforcing policies and procedures for the company as well as conducting audits and working with external auditors. While working at CURE and InnoZen, Inc., Mr. Udell gained valuable knowledge in the drug delivery industry and is a key contributor in the development and commercialization of various drug delivery technologies. He has also held the position as Auditing Manager at Green Hasson & Janks, LLP in Los Angeles. Mr. Udell received his B.A. in Business Economics with a concentration in accounting from the University of California, Santa Barbara.
Jessica Rousset – Chief Business Officer
Jessica Rousset has been with the Company since March 15, 2017 as the Company’s Chief Business Officer where Mrs. Rousset oversees operations and drives corporate strategy and growth. Mrs. Rousset was also appointed as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer on January 22, 2018. She is a seasoned business development and commercialization leader, expert in bridging corporate, academic and governmental interests toward the common goal of improving patient’s lives. She brings more than fifteen years of experience fostering innovation in large organizations and advising start-ups to bring novel healthcare solutions to market and into clinical use. Mrs. Rousset previously served as Head of Innovation at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, where over a ten year period from 2011 to 2016, she helped launch both therapeutic and medical device companies and founded and operated a national pediatric technology accelerator. Prior to that, Mrs. Rousset held positions at The Scripps Research Institute and GlaxoSmithkline Biologicals in laboratory, clinical research and business development roles. She trained as a biochemical engineer at the Institut National des Sciences Appliquées in Lyon, France.
William Yuan – Director
William Yuan was most recently Chairman and CEO of Fortress Hill Holdings, an Asian-based investment banking firm. With 23 years in global finance experience, he has served as a key strategist and advisor to international institutions. U.S. companies advised by Mr. Yuan include Amgen Corp., Biogen, GE Capital, Warner Brothers Studios, and Fox News. He has also guided such leading Asian institutions as Sina.com, Shanghai Petrochemicals, Jinlia Pharmaceutical and Tsingtao Beer Corp. In 1995, Mr. Yuan led Merrill Lynch Asset Management Asia, and managed one of the largest pension/retirement funds in the world, with a $488 billion portfolio under his leadership. Simultaneously, he was chairman and portfolio manager of the $1.2 billion AmerAsia Hedge Fund. In 1993, he was the founder and managing director of the Corporate Institutional Services Group at Merrill Lynch Asset Management. Prior to that, Mr. Yuan served as a senior-vice president and co-manager at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney’s Portfolio Management Corporation with dual functions as co-head of the Capital Markets Derivative team, and Chairman of the Technology Investment Management and Executive Policy Committee. He began his finance career at Goldman Sachs in 1983 as an investment banker in Mergers & Acquisitions. Mr. Yuan is a member of the International Who’s Who of Finance, Technology, Media and Telecom. Mr. Yuan holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics from Cornell University and attended Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School as a Mason Fellow. Mr. Yuan’s extensive finance, investment banking and corporate strategy background as well as his experience advising large pharmaceutical companies such as Amgen, Biogen and Jinlia Pharmaceutical qualify him to serve on our Board.
Charles Berman - Director
Most recently a former shareholder of the international law firm of Greenberg Traurig, Charles Berman has focused his practice in patent work for more than 40 years. His clients included both major corporations and smaller companies, which he represents within the U.S. and internationally. He has a degree in electrical engineering and a law degree from the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, where he also started his legal career, concentrating in patent work. In 1978 Berman joined Lyon & Lyon’s Los Angeles office as an associate, and then was a partner in other national law firms including Merchant & Gould of Minnesota. He is admitted to practice before the US Patent and Trademark Office, the U.S. District Court, Central District of California and the US Supreme Court. From 1996-2000, he served as president, secretary and treasurer of the Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association (“LAIPLA”), and has represented LAIPLA and the California State Bar Intellectual Property Section before the U.S. Bar/European Patent Office- Liaison Council and the U.S. Bar/Japanese Patent Office- Liaison Council since 1990. Berman also has been a member of the Editorial Board of Managing Intellectual Property magazine since 1992. A board member of the American Intellectual Property Association from 1995 to 1998, he was a founding fellow of the AIPLA and served as Chair of the Fellows. Mr. Berman’s extensive work experience as a patent attorney providing legal services to major corporations and smaller companies, both within the U.S. and internationally, qualifies him to serve on our Board.
Alan Einstein - Director
Dr. Alan Einstein, grandson to famed Albert Einstein, has been practicing medicine since 1996. His educational history includes a Bachelors of Science undergraduate degree in Physical Chemistry from The University of Florida. Subsequently, he earned his medical degree from The College of Osteopathic Medicine and Surgery in Des Moines, Iowa, in 1992. Subsequently, Dr. Einstein completed his Internship and Residency training at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine/Sinai Hospital program in Internal Medicine, in Baltimore, MD in 1995, where he was recognized as, “The Outstanding Senior Resident of the Year.” Dr. Einstein is also involved in medical research utilizing Umbilical Cord Blood stem cells, with a particular interest in Parkinson’s disease. Dr. Einstein also assisted Senator David Shafer in the writing and passage of Georgia’s first and only Cord Blood stem cell bill. Furthermore, in July 2006, Georgia’s Governor Sonny Perdue appointed Dr. Einstein to the, “Commission for Newborn Umbilical Cord Blood Research and Medical Treatment.” He emphasizes health and preventative care to allow individuals to achieve their maximum potential. He has numerous areas of medical expertise including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, thyroid and hormone metabolism disorders. He emphasizes returning adults to a normal hormonal state, yet via a more natural route. Furthermore, Dr. Einstein is a thought leader in the area of metabolic syndrome and its role in weight gain and overall health and longevity. He has presented to his medical peers at numerous medical institutions and conferences around the country, and has been featured on Video Health Magazine and Diabetes News Stand. Dr. Einstein prides himself in individualized and unrushed medical care. He takes detailed histories and performs thorough physical examinations while paying attention to detail.
Term of Office
Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws.
Our executive officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board.
Significant Employees
None.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships between or among the directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or executive officers.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
To the best of our knowledge, during the past five years, none of the following occurred with respect to a present director, person nominated to become director, executive officer, or control person: (1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.
Audit Committee
We do not have a separately-designated standing audit committee. The entire board of directors performs the functions of an audit committee, but no written charter governs the actions of the board of directors when performing the functions of that would generally be performed by an audit committee. The board of directors approves the selection of our independent accountants and meets and interacts with the independent accountants to discuss issues related to financial reporting. In addition, the board of directors reviews the scope and results of the audit with the independent accountants, reviews with management and the independent accountants our annual operating results, considers the adequacy of our internal accounting procedures and considers other auditing and accounting matters including fees to be paid to the independent auditor and the performance of the independent auditor.
We do not have an audit committee financial expert because of the size of our company and our board of directors at this time. We believe that we do not require an audit committee financial expert at this time because we retain outside consultants who possess these attributes.
Nominating Committee
We do not have a nominating committee. The board of directors acts as the nominating committee and members of the board participate in the discussions. If the size of the board expands, the board will reconsider the need or desirability of a nominating committee.
Compensation Committee
We do not have a compensation committee. If the size of the board expands, the board will reconsider the need or desirability of a compensation committee.
For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, the board of directors:
|
1.
|
Reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management, and
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Reviewed and discussed the written disclosures and the letter from our independent auditors on the matters relating to the auditor’s independence.
|
Based upon the board of directors’ review and discussion of the matters above, the board of directors authorized inclusion of the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 to be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Code of Ethics Disclosure
We adopted a Code of Ethics. The code of ethics is available on the Company's website.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
.
The following executive compensation disclosure reflects all compensation for the periods ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, received by our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and most highly compensated executive officers.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
Name & Principal Position
|
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
December 31,
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Davidson (1)
|
|
2017
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|
|
2016
|
|
|
118,333
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
118,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward Maliski (1)
|
|
2017
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
President, Chief Scientific Officer
|
|
2016
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne Nasby (1) (2)
|
|
2017
|
|
|
129,783
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
129,783
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
2016
|
|
|
104,792
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
104,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Udell
|
|
2017
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
|
|
2016
|
|
|
102,305
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
102,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jessica Rousset (3)
|
|
2017
|
|
|
127,953
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
127,953
|
|
|
Chief Business Officer
|
|
2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Hlavsa (4)
|
|
2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anna Ioannou (5)
|
|
2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
This does not include convertible promissory notes issued to such executive in connection with accrued payroll as described in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” under Item 2.01 “Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets” in the Form 8-K filed December 13, 2016.
|
|
(2)
|
Wayne Nasby entered into a separation agreement that was effective January 21, 2018
|
|
(3)
|
Jessica Rousset was appointed to Chief Operating Officer effective January 22, 2018
|
|
(4)
|
Michael Hlavsa resigned as the Company’s president, chief executive and treasurer on November 7, 2016.
|
|
(5)
|
Anna Ioannou resigned as the Company’s president, chief executive and treasurer on June 28, 2016.
|
Director Compensation
The table below summarizes all compensation earned by each of our directors for services performed during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
|
Name
|
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Non-qualified Deferred Comp Earnings
($)
|
|
|
All Other
Comp
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Davidson
|
|
2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William Yuan
|
|
2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles Berman
|
|
2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anna Ioannou (1)
|
|
2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Hlavsa (2)
|
|
2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan Einstein
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________________
|
(1)
|
Anna Ioannou resigned as the Company’s director on June 28, 2016.
|
|
(2)
|
Michael Hlavsa resigned as the Company’s director on November 7, 2016.
|
Employment Agreements
On March 15, 2017 (the “Effective Date”), the Company entered into an employment agreement with Jessica Rousset (“Executive”) to serve as the Company’s Chief Business Officer with such customary responsibilities, duties and authority normally associated with such position. In the performance of such duties, the Executive shall report to the Board of Directors and shall receive a base salary at a rate of $145,000 per annum (such annual base salary, as it may be adjusted from time to time, the “Annual Base Salary”). The Annual Base Salary shall be paid in equal installments in accordance with the customary payroll practices of the Company, but no less frequently than monthly. The Company’s Board shall review the Executive’s salary at least once a year and shall increase her salary if, in the sole discretion of the Board, an increase is warranted. The term of employment under the employment agreement (the “Term”) shall commence on the Effective Date and continue for a period of one year, unless terminated in accordance with Section 3 of the employment agreement. Following the expiration of the initial Term, the Term shall be extended by one year unless terminated by either the Executive or the Company.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control
The Company and Wayne Nasby entered into a Separation Agreement which granted Mr. Nasby a separation payment totaling $65,000 which is equivalent to six months of his base salary, less standard payroll deductions and withholdings, in six monthly payments beginning January 31, 2018. Additionally, the Company will pay Mr. Nasby’s COBRA premiums for six months following the Separation Date, totaling approximately $35,000.
We currently have no other contract, agreement, plan or arrangement, whether written or unwritten, that provides for payments to a named executive officer at, following, or in connection with any termination, including without limitation resignation, severance, retirement or a constructive termination of a named executive officer, or a change in control of the registrant or a change in the named executive officer’s responsibilities, with respect to each named executive officer.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table sets forth certain information, as of March 21, 2018 with respect to the beneficial ownership of the outstanding common stock by (i) any holder of more than five (5%) percent; (ii) each of our executive officers and directors; and (iii) our directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, each of the stockholders listed below has sole voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned.
|
Named Executives Officers and Directors (1)
|
|
Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned (2)
|
|
|
Percent of
Class (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Davidson
|
|
|
535,469
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
Edward Maliski
|
|
|
471,131
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
%
|
|
Mark Udell
|
|
|
442,632
|
|
|
|
1.85
|
%
|
|
Jessica Rousset
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
William Yuan
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Charles Berman
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Alan Einstein
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Executive Officers and Directors as a group (7 person)
|
|
|
1,449,232
|
|
|
|
6.06
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Branstetter Group (5)
|
|
|
2,754,626
|
|
|
|
11.53
|
%
|
|
Climate Change Investigation, Innovation and Investment Company, LLC (6)
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
12.55
|
%
|
___________________
|
(1)
|
Unless otherwise noted, the address for each of the named beneficial owners is: 1620 Beacon Place, Oxnard, California 93035.
|
|
(2)
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Commission generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Under the rules of the Commission, a person (or group of persons) is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if he or she, directly or indirectly, has or shares a power to vote or to direct the voting of such security. Accordingly, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same security. In accordance with Commission rules, shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon exercise of stock options or warrants which are currently exercisable or which become exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table are deemed beneficially owned by the optionees. Subject to community property laws, where applicable, we believe the persons or entities named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of the Common Stock indicated as beneficially owned by them.
|
|
(3)
|
In determining percentage of outstanding, we included shares issued and outstanding, shares obligated to be issued and the securities identified (if consisting of derivative securities) as if issued. As of December 31, 2017, we had 23,901,252 shares of common stock.
|
|
(4)
|
The address for this shareholder is 271 North Sepulveda, California 90266.
|
|
(5)
|
The address for this shareholder is 12 San Rafael Avenue, Belvedere, California 94920.
|
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
.
As of March 31, 2016 our sole officer and director advanced us $4,032, which is not a part of a Loan Agreement. Anna Ioannou verbally agreed to loan this amount to the Company. The loan is not interest bearing, without any profit and has no set maturity date, and the Company intends to repay the loan as cash flow becomes available. Ms. Ioannou was not repaid from the proceeds of the offering in 2016. There is no due date for the repayment of the funds advanced by Ms. Ioannou. Ms. Ioannou will be repaid from revenues of operations if and when we generate significant revenues to pay the obligation. There is a written agreement evidencing the advancement of funds by Ms. Ioannou.
On various dates from October 31, 2014 to February 2, 2015, CURE Pharmaceutical issued convertible promissory notes to Ronick, Inc., (“Ronick”) totaling $89,000 that were due on February 25, 2016, but Ronick has agreed to extend the due date to August 31, 2016. Robert Davidson, our Chief Executive Officer and director, is a shareholder of Ronick. Interest is payable at 3% per annum and is secured by technology and patent rights. Principal and accrued interest is convertible into common stock at $4.00 per share. This conversion is subject to an adjustment if CURE Pharmaceutical sells stock or grants conversion rates at a lower price; however, Ronick has subsequently agreed to waive these conversion rights and will convert at $4.00 per share. As of October 6, 2016, Ronick has converted $35,260 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 8,815 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical. As of October 6, 2016, Ronick converted $35,290 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 8,822 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical.
On December 31, 2015, CURE Pharmaceutical converted $100,150 of accrued payroll for Robert Davidson into a convertible promissory note. As of October 6, 2016, Robert Davidson has converted $38,415 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 9,604 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical. On October 17, 2016, Robert Davidson transferred his convertible promissory note to Ronick. On that same date, Ronick converted $38,449 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 9,612 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical.
On December 31, 2015, CURE Pharmaceutical converted $94,312 of accrued payroll for Wayne Nasby, our Chief Operating Officer, into a convertible promissory note. As of October 6, 2016, Wayne Nasby has converted $48,241 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 12,060 of common stock shares of the CURE Pharmaceutical. As of October 17, 2016, Wayne Nasby converted $48,284 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 12,071 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical.
On December 31, 2015, CURE Pharmaceutical converted $77,250 of accrued payroll for Edward Maliski, our President and Chief Science Officer, into a convertible promissory note. As of October 6, 2016, Edward Maliski has converted $39,514 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 9,878 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical. As of October 17, 2016, Edward Maliski converted $39,549 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 9,887 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical.
On December 31, 2015, CURE Pharmaceutical converted $51,500 of accrued payroll for Jonathan Turman into a convertible promissory note. As of October 6, 2016, Jonathan Turman has converted $26,343 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 6,586 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical. As of October 17, 2016, Jonathan Turman converted $26,366 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 6,591 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical.
At December 31, 2017, two of our executive officers, Robert Davidson and Mark Udell, had $7,931 and $13,716, respectively, due to them and are included in accounts payable. At December 31, 2016, one of our executive officers, Robert Davidson, had $10,992 due to him and is included in accounts payable.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
.
Our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were audited by RBSM LLP.
Since we do not have a formal audit committee, our board of directors serves as our audit committee. We have not adopted pre-approval policies and procedures with respect to our accountants. All of the services provided and fees charged by our independent registered accounting firms were approved by the board of directors.
Services rendered by RBSM LLP
The following is a summary of the fees for professional services rendered by RBSM LLP for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
|
Fee Category
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Audit fees
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
85,510
|
|
|
Audit-related fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Other fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$
|
86,500
|
|
|
$
|
88,510
|
|
Audit fees.
Audit fees represent fees for professional services performed by RBSM LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our quarterly financial statements, as well as services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-related fees.
We did not incur any other fees for services performed by RBSM LLP, other than the services covered in “Audit Fees” for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 or 2016.
Tax Fees
. Tax fees represent fees for professional services performed by RBSM LLP for the corporate tax preparation for the Federal and State.
Other fees
. RBSM LLP did not receive any other fees during for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 or 2016.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS
CURE Pharmaceutical Holding Corp (the “Company”), formally known as Makkanotti Group Corp, was incorporated in the State of Nevada on May 15, 2014. The Company was originally formed to engage in the business of manufacturing food paper bags in Nicosia, Cyprus. On November 7, 2016, the Company changed its name to CURE Pharmaceutical Holding Corp.
On November 7, 2016, the Company, in a reverse take-over transaction, acquired CURE Pharmaceutical Corporation (“CURE Pharmaceutical”), a specialty pharmaceutical and bioscience company based in California that specializes in drug delivery technologies, by executing a Share Exchange Agreement and Conversion Agreement (“Exchange Agreement”) by and among the Company and a holder of a majority of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the registrant prior to the closing (the “Majority Stockholder”), on the one hand, and CURE Pharmaceutical a California corporation, all of the shareholders of CURE Pharmaceutical’s issued and outstanding share capital (the “CURE Pharm Shareholders”) and the holders of certain convertible promissory notes of CURE Pharmaceutical (“CURE Pharm Noteholders”), on the other hand. Hereinafter, this share exchange transaction is described as the “Share Exchange.” As a result of the Share Exchange, CURE Pharmaceutical became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and the CURE Pharm Shareholders and CURE Pharm Noteholders became the controlling shareholders of the Company.
For accounting purposes, CURE Pharmaceutical shall be the surviving entity. The transaction is accounted for using the reverse acquisition method of accounting. As a result of the recapitalization and change in control, CURE Pharmaceutical is the acquiring entity in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations.
CURE Pharmaceutical Holding Corp is a specialty pharmaceutical and bioscience company with a focus in drug delivery technologies. CURE leverages novel drug delivery technologies to develop and commercialize new applications of proven therapeutics through Oral Thin Film (“OTF”) via our proprietary patented CUREFilm™ Technology as well as through transdermal applications. Our micro encapsulation of drug actives in our CUREFilm™ Technology allows for a higher volume of an active and if required, multiple actives to be produced on a single oral thin film strip.
The Company is focused on partnering with pharmaceutical and biotech companies seeking to deliver drug actives utilizing and benefitting from our proprietary OTF and transdermal applications and when preferable to take our own products from clinical process to commercialization. We are focused on both the human and veterinary prescription, OTC and nutraceutical markets. CURE represents the complete solution for OTF drug delivery therapeutics from inception to finished product utilizing our CGMP/FDA registered manufacturing facility and processes.
In July 2017, the Company, Therapix Biosciences Ltd. (“Therapix”), a specialty clinical-stage pharmaceutical company dedicated to the development of cannabinoid-based drugs headquartered in Israel, and Assuta Medical Centers, Ltd., a medical services center located in Israel, entered into a nonbinding memorandum of understanding to collaborate to advance, research, develop and commercialize potential therapeutic products in the fields of personalized medicine and cannabinoids. On October 27, 2017, the Company entered into a development agreement with Therapix where the Company will formulate and develop pharmaceutical products using Therapix’s proprietary compounds while utilizing the Company’s proprietary OTF technology.
Consistent with our mission of improving the lives of all people in need, regardless of geography or economic status, we have made our technology available to a private company, Oak Therapeutics (“Oak”), that is developing novel drug formulations for patients in developing nations (“Territory”). On November 10, 2017, we received 269,000 shares of Oak as consideration for an exclusive license to our patents rights in the Territory, along with a royalty-free non-exclusive license to any improvements made by Oak. As a result of this transaction, we own approximately 63% of Oak’s outstanding shares and have consolidated Oak’s financial statements as of the fourth quarter 2017. Oak has completed a Phase I Small Business Innovative Research Contract (“SBIR”) from the National Institutes of Health to develop a formulation for 300mg of Isoniazid in a rapidly dissolving film as an anti-tuberculosis treatment option. Oak is currently in the application process for Phase II of the SBIR program to continue its research and development and focus on manufacturing scale up, clinical trials and commercialization.
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of consolidation and basis of presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CURE Pharmaceutical Holding Corp (“CPHC”), its wholly-owned subsidiary, CURE Pharmaceutical Corporation (“CURE”) and its majority owned subsidiary Oak Therapeutics, Inc. (“OAK”), collectively referred to as (“CURE”, “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company” All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company’s film strip product represents the principal operations of the Company.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. At December 31, 2017 and 2016 included in these estimates are assumptions about collection of accounts receivable, and useful life of fixed and intangible assets, tax valuation analysis, and warrant fair values.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all cash on hand and in banks, including accounts in book overdraft positions, certificates of deposit and other highly-liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 the Company had no cash equivalents. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in banks insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) in accounts that at times may be in excess of the federally insured limit of $250,000 per bank. The Company minimizes this risk by placing its cash deposits with major financial institutions.
Investment in Associates
An associate is an entity over which the Company has significant influence through a joint venture. Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee but not control or have joint control over those policies.
The results of assets and liabilities of associates are incorporated in the consolidated financial statements using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, investments in associates are carried in the consolidated balance sheet at cost as adjusted for post-acquisition changes in the Company’s share of the net assets of the associate, less any impairment in the value of the investment. Losses of an associate in excess of the Company’s interest in that associate are not recognized. Additional losses are provided for, and a liability is recognized, only to the extent that the Company has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate.
Any excess of the cost of acquisition over the Company’s share of the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the associate recognized at the date of acquisition is recognized as goodwill. The goodwill is included within the carrying amount of the investment.
On January 8, 2016, the Company received 50% ownership in CURE Innovations, Inc (“CI”). CI was created in 2015 by IncuBrands Studio, Inc (“IncuBrands”). The Company and IncuBrands each own 50% of the common stock of CI. The Company and IncuBrands entered into a Joint Venture agreement in 2013 to distribute several OTF products utilizing IncuBrands marketing and contacts in various industries as well as utilize the Company’s technology and capabilities of manufacturing OTF’s.
On December 6, 2016, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (“Joint Venture”) with Pace Wellness, Inc. (“Pace”) to jointly develop three Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (“API”) within the nonprescription and/or Over-the-Counter (OTC) medicines specifically utilizing the Company’s patented and proprietary CUREFilm™ Technology. The three API’s to be jointly developed are Diphenhydramine HCL, Omeprazole and a third API to be determined at a later date (“Products”). Pace shall be the exclusive global distributor of the Products under the Solves Strips® branding or other private or branded labels. All benefits, advantages, and liabilities derived from, or incurred in respect of the Joint Venture shall be borne by the parties in proportion of their respective participating interests of 50/50 equal interest. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has contributed $5,000 to the Joint Venture.
On June 30, 2015, our subsidiary, Oak Therapeutics, Inc. (“Oak”), issued 25,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for $10,000 and 181,251 common stock shares of Pace Wellness, Inc. (“Pace”) at a value of $1.00 per share, which represents 1.8% interest in Pace. Oak has fully written off the investment as of the acquisition date, November 10, 2017.
Acquisitions
On November 10, 2017, we received 269,000 shares of Oak as consideration for an exclusive license to our patents rights in developing nations, along with a royalty-free non-exclusive license to any improvements made by Oak. As a result of this transaction, we own approximately 63% of Oak’s outstanding shares and have consolidated Oak’s financial statements as of the fourth quarter 2017. The following summarizes the consideration paid for Oak and the amounts of the assets and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date, as well as the fair value at the acquisition date of the noncontrolling interest in Oak.
|
|
|
As of
November 10,
2017
|
|
|
Consideration
|
|
|
|
|
License of CURE’s intellectual property
|
|
$
|
139,000
|
|
|
Fair value of total consideration transferred
|
|
$
|
139,000
|
|
|
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
65,702
|
|
|
Intangible asset
|
|
|
139,000
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(791
|
)
|
|
Loans from shareholder
|
|
|
(4,217
|
)
|
|
Total identifiable net assets
|
|
|
199,694
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in Oak
|
|
|
(60,694
|
)
|
|
CURE’s interest in Oak
|
|
$
|
139,000
|
|
Unaudited pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017, as if the Company and Oak had been combined as of the beginning of the period, follows. The pro forma results include estimates and assumptions which management believes are reasonable. However, pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred if the business combination had been in effect on the dates indicated, or which may result in the future.
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
363,434
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(8,099,441
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.34
|
)
|
Property and Equipment
The Company capitalizes expenditures related to property and equipment, subject to a minimum rule, that have a useful life greater than one year for: (1) assets purchased; (2) existing assets that are replaced, improved or the useful lives have been extended; or (3) all land, regardless of cost. Acquisitions of new assets, additions, replacements and improvements (other than land) costing less than the minimum rule in addition to maintenance and repair costs, including any planned major maintenance activities, are expensed as incurred. Depreciation has been provided using the straight-line method on the following estimated useful lives:
|
Manufacturing equipment
|
|
5-7 Years
|
|
|
Computer and other equipment
|
|
3-7 Years
|
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
Lesser of useful life or the
term of the lease
|
|
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the FASB ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. ASC 605 requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred and/or service has been performed; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company believes that these criteria are satisfied upon shipment from our facility. Freight billed to customers is presented as revenues, and the related freight costs are presented as cost of goods sold. Deferred revenue is recognized when earned and all significant obligations have been satisfied.
Accounts receivable
Accounts receivable are generally unsecured. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based on the age of outstanding invoices and management’s evaluation of collectability. Accounts are written off after all reasonable collection efforts have been exhausted and management concludes that likelihood of collection is remote. Any future recoveries are applied against the allowance for doubtful accounts.
Inventory
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The Company determines the cost of its inventory, which includes amounts related to materials, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead, on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company performs an assessment of the recoverability of capitalized inventory during each reporting period, and writes down any excess and obsolete inventories to their realizable value in the period in which the impairment is first identified.
Advertising Expense
The Company expenses marketing, promotions and advertising costs as incurred. Such costs are included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying statements of operations. The Company recorded advertising costs of $13,062 and $12,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Research and Development
Costs incurred in connection with the development of new products and processes are charged to research and development expenses as incurred. The Company recorded research and development expenses of $1,427,341 and $753,369 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes FASB ASC 740, “Income Taxes,” which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is “more likely-than-not” that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The Company generated a deferred tax asset through net operating loss carry-forward. However, a valuation allowance of 100% has been established due to the uncertainty of the Company’s realization of the net operating loss carry forward prior to its expiration.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of the Share-Based Payment Topic of ASC 718 which requires recognition in the consolidated financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The ASC also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award.
Pursuant to ASC Topic 505-50, for share-based payments to consultants and other third-parties, compensation expense is determined at the “measurement date.” The expense is recognized over the vesting period of the award. Until the measurement date is reached, the total amount of compensation expense remains uncertain. The Company initially records compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the reporting date.
Convertible Debentures
Beneficial Conversion Feature
If the conversion features of conventional convertible debt provides for a rate of conversion that is below market value, this feature is characterized as a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). A BCF is recorded by the Company as a debt discount pursuant to ASC Topic 470-20 ”Debt with Conversion and Other Options.” In those circumstances, the convertible debt is recorded net of the discount related to the BCF and the Company amortizes the discount to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method.
Derivative Liabilities
ASC 815-40 (formerly SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities”), requires that embedded derivative instruments be bifurcated and assessed, along with free-standing derivative instruments such as warrants, on their issuance date and in accordance with ASC 815-40-15 (formerly EITF 00-19 “Accounting for derivative financial instruments indexed to, and potentially settled in, a company’s own stock”) to determine whether they should be considered a derivative liability and measured at their fair value for accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing formula and present value pricing. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company adjusted its derivative liability to its fair value, and reflected the change in fair value, in its consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.
Basic and diluted loss per share
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common equivalent shares, which consist of stock options and warrants, have been excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation because their effect is anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of common stock shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
23,901,252
|
|
|
Number of common stock shares from conversion of convertible notes
|
|
|
307,904
|
|
|
Number of common stock shares from exercise of warrants
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
Total fully-diluted common stock shares
|
|
|
24,569,156
|
|
Going Concern
The Company’s financial statements are prepared using U.S. GAAP applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company had an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2017 of $18,868,599. The Company had a working deficit of $2,784,574 as of December 31, 2017. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the issuance of the financial statements. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it establishes a revenue stream and becomes profitable. The Company is continually analyzing its current costs and is attempting to make additional cost reductions where possible. We expect that we will continue to generate losses from operations throughout 2018.
Historically, the Company has had operating losses and negative cash flows from operations which cast significant doubt upon the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company will need to raise capital in order to fund its operations. This need may be adversely impacted by uncertain market conditions and changes in the regulatory environment. To address its financing requirements, the Company intends to seek financing through debt and equity issuances to existing stockholders.
Specifically, management has identified that a minimum of $4,000,000 of capital is needed over the next 12 months in order sustain operations. These capital needs take into account, among other things, management’s plans to advance intellectual property, maintenance of patents, upgrades for manufacturing and to hire personnel for business development. Management has outlined a plan to raise between $8,000,000 to $10,000,000 in capital over the next 12 months through the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock to accredited investors. Management believes that the capital raised through these methods will be sufficient to sustain operations for the next 12 months. However, the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty at this time.
The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the issuance of the financial statements. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets and liabilities that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, which defines fair value as used in numerous accounting pronouncements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements.
The estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents are carried at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.
ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 — quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable
Level 3 — inputs that are unobservable (for example cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions)
The Company has assets or liabilities valued at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Long-lived Assets
Long-lived assets include equipment and intangible assets other than those with indefinite lives. We assess the carrying value of our long-lived asset groups when indicators of impairment exist and recognize an impairment loss when the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable when compared to undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset.
Indicators of impairment include significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in our use of the assets or in our business strategy, loss of or changes in customer relationships and significant negative industry or economic trends. When indications of impairment arise for a particular asset or group of assets, we assess the future recoverability of the carrying value of the asset (or asset group) based on an undiscounted cash flow analysis. If carrying value exceeds projected, net, undiscounted cash flows, an additional analysis is performed to determine the fair value of the asset (or asset group), typically a discounted cash flow analysis, and an impairment charge is recorded for the excess of carrying value over fair value. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, our qualitative analysis of long-lived assets did not indicate any impairment.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
In the normal course of business, the Company provided credit terms to its customers; however, collateral was not required. Accordingly, the Company performed credit evaluations of its customers and maintained allowances for possible losses which, when realized, were within the range of management’s expectations. From time to time, a higher concentration of credit risk existed on outstanding accounts receivable for a select number of customers due to individual buying patterns.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales includes the purchase cost of products sold and all costs associated with getting the products to our customers, including transportation costs.
Shipping Costs
Shipping and handling costs billed to customers are recorded in sales. Shipping costs incurred by the company are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Related parties
Parties are considered to be related to the Company if the parties that, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal owners of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal owners of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. All transactions with related parties shall be recorded at fair value of the goods or services exchanged.
Recently Issued Standards
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The purpose is to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. This ASU is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018. Early adoption is not permitted except for limited provisions. The Company does not expect the adoption of this amendment to have a material effect on its financial condition and results of operations.
In January 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which requires, among other things, that entities measure equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Under the standard, entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized holding gains and losses on equity securities classified today as available for sale as a component of other comprehensive income. For equity investments without readily determinable fair values the cost method of accounting is also eliminated, however subject to certain exceptions, entities will be able to elect to record equity investments without readily determinable fair values at cost, less impairment and plus or minus adjustments for observable price changes, with all such changes recognized in earnings. This new standard does not change the guidance for classifying and measuring investments in debt securities and loans. The standard is effective for us on July 1, 2018 (the first quarter of our 2019 fiscal year). The Company is currently evaluating the anticipated impact of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02—Leases (Topic 842), requiring lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with the exception of short-term leases. For lessees, leases will continue to be classified as either operating or finance leases in the income statement. The effective date of the new standard for public companies is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition and requires application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. The Company is evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)
that clarifies how to apply revenue recognition guidance related to whether an entity is a principal or an agent. ASU 2016-08 clarifies that the analysis must focus on whether the entity has control of the goods or services before they are transferred to the customer and provides additional guidance about how to apply the control principle when services are provided and when goods or services are combined with other goods or services. The effective date for ASU 2016-08 is the same as the effective date of ASU 2014-09 as amended by ASU 2015-14, for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. The Company does not anticipate a significant impact upon adoption.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The new standard requires recognition of the income tax effects of vested or settled awards in the income statement and involves several other aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. This new standard became effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or statements of cash flows upon adoption.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing
, which provides further guidance on identifying performance obligations and improves the operability and understandability of licensing implementation guidance. The effective date for ASU 2016-10 is the same as the effective date of ASU 2014-09 as amended by ASU 2015-14, for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. The Company does not anticipate a significant impact upon adoption.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, “
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients
”, to clarify certain core recognition principles including collectability, sales tax presentation, noncash consideration, contract modifications and completed contracts at transition and disclosures no longer required if the full retrospective transition method is adopted. The effective date and transition requirements for these amendments are annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods therein, and that would also permit public entities to elect to adopt the amendments as of the original effective date as applicable to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The new guidance allows for the amendment to be applied either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company does not anticipate a significant impact upon adoption.
In August, 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU 2016-15”). The amendments in ASU 2016-15 address eight specific cash flow issues and apply to all entities that are required to present a statement of cash flows under ASC Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption during an interim period. The Company does not anticipate a significant impact upon adoption.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. This new standard clarifies the definition of a business and provides a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018; however, early adoption is permitted with prospective application to any business development transaction.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09,
Compensation-Stock Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting,
which provides clarification on when modification accounting should be used for changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. This ASU does not change the accounting for modifications but clarifies that modification accounting guidance should only be applied if there is a change to the value, vesting conditions or award classification and would not be required if the changes are considered non-substantive. The amendments of this ASU are effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2017-09 is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
There are various other updates recently issued, however, they are not expected to a have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 3 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for sales returns and doubtful accounts, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
4,364
|
|
|
$
|
7,049
|
|
|
Less allowances
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
4,364
|
|
|
$
|
7,049
|
|
NOTE 4 – PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS
As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, prepaid expenses and other assets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid consulting services – stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
258,918
|
|
|
$
|
150,168
|
|
|
Prepaid consulting services
|
|
|
116,167
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Prepaid clinical study
|
|
|
110,538
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
|
60,180
|
|
|
|
42,785
|
|
|
Other Receivables
|
|
|
5,858
|
|
|
|
10,948
|
|
|
Prepaid inventory
|
|
|
12,182
|
|
|
|
13,178
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
23,045
|
|
|
|
6,800
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
$
|
586,888
|
|
|
$
|
223,879
|
|
NOTE 5 - INVENTORY
Inventory consists of raw materials, packaging components, work-in-process and finished goods. The Company’s inventory is stated at the lower of cost (FIFO cost basis) or net realizable value.
The carrying value of inventory consisted of the following:
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw Materials
|
|
$
|
67,664
|
|
|
$
|
68,047
|
|
|
Packaging Components
|
|
|
17,546
|
|
|
|
84,927
|
|
|
Work-In-Process
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
17,406
|
|
|
Finished Goods
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,039
|
|
|
|
170,380
|
|
|
Reserve for Obsolescence
|
|
|
(41,043
|
)
|
|
|
(89,095
|
)
|
|
Total inventory
|
|
$
|
44,996
|
|
|
$
|
81,285
|
|
NOTE 6 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, property and equipment and intangible assets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing equipment
|
|
$
|
797,513
|
|
|
$
|
769,074
|
|
|
Computer and other equipment
|
|
|
169,499
|
|
|
|
116,747
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
42,666
|
|
|
|
36,066
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(672,317
|
)
|
|
|
(551,239
|
)
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
$
|
337,361
|
|
|
$
|
370,648
|
|
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $121,078 and $129,985 respectively, which includes depreciation of $8,640 for capitalized leased assets for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Accumulated depreciation for property held under capital leases were $37,177 and $28,537 as December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
$
|
814,582
|
|
|
$
|
814,582
|
|
|
Patents
|
|
|
224,527
|
|
|
|
175,047
|
|
|
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(138,637
|
)
|
|
|
(95,119
|
)
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
900,472
|
|
|
$
|
894,510
|
|
The Company incurred $49,480 and $45,930 of legal patent costs that were capitalized during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company wrote off $58,522 of intangibles during the year ended December 31, 2016. Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $43,518 and $42,663, respectively.
The estimated aggregate amortization expense over each of the next five years is as follows:
|
2018
|
|
$
|
43,518
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
43,518
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
43,518
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
43,518
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
43,518
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
513,785
|
|
|
Total Amortization
|
|
$
|
731,375
|
|
NOTE 7 – NOTE RECEIVABLE
Note receivable consists of the following at December 31, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The note receivable is a promissory note with a company bearing an interest rate of 8% per annum, principal and accrued and unpaid interest is payable on demand of the Company any time before November 11, 2016 or by November 11, 2016 if no demand is made prior to such date. This note has been written off in 2016.
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
17,948
|
|
|
The note receivable is a promissory note with a company bearing an interest rate of 8% per annum, principal and accrued and unpaid interest is payable on demand of the Company any time before March 29, 2017 or by March 29, 2017 if no demand is made prior to such date. This note has been written off in 2016.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36,238
|
|
|
Less allowances
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(36,238
|
)
|
|
Current portion of note receivable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Note receivable, less current portion
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
NOTE 8 – LOAN PAYABLE
Loan payable consists of the following at December 31, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Notes to a company due August 29, 2018 and September 21, 2018, including interest at 7.55% and 7.05%, respectively per annum; unsecured; interest due monthly
|
|
$
|
50,425
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
Note to a company due September 29, 2017 including interest at 13,25% per annum; unsecured; interest due monthly
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
33,277
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,425
|
|
|
$
|
33,277
|
|
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $2,011 and $930, respectively.
NOTE 9 – NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable consist of the following at December 31, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note to a company amended on August 27, 2017 and due on or before one month from the amended date and the maturity date shall be extended for one month periods as long as the Company is not in default, interest shall accrue at 10% per annum, secured by the Company’s intellectual property
|
|
$
|
650,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
Note to a company of $100,000 due January 31, 2018 including interest of $3,000 per month, unsecured, principal and interest due at maturity, principal and interest repaid on January 23, 2018
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Note to an individual, non-interest bearing, unsecured and has no fixed terms of repayment
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred $10,000 and $0, respectively, amortization of discount. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $30,226 and $0, respectively.
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES
Convertible promissory notes consist of the following at December 31, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible promissory notes totaling $1,900,000 due between November 11, 2017 and May 8, 2018, interest payable at 8% per annum; unsecured; principal and accrued interest convertible into common stock at the lower of $7.00 per share or the price per share of the latest closing of a debt or equity offering by the Company greater than $3,000,000; accrued interest due between November 11, 2017 and May 8, 2018; convertible promissory notes totaling $1,300,000 were amended to extend the maturity date to March 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
1,900,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
(348,512
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Convertible promissory notes
|
|
$
|
1,551,488
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred $1,170,873 and $0, respectively, amortization of discount. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $84,161 and $0, respectively.
NOTE 11 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITY
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2017 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
Level I
|
|
|
Level II
|
|
|
Level III
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(90,738
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,738
|
)
|
No financial assets or liabilities were measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016.
The Company has issued convertible promissory notes during 2017. The convertible notes require us to record the value of the conversion feature as a liability, at fair value, pursuant to ASC 815, including provisions in the notes that protect the holders from declines in the Company’s stock price, which is considered outside the control of the Company. The derivative liabilities are marked-to-market each reporting period and changes in fair value are recorded as a non-operating gain or loss in our statement of operations, until they are completely settled. The fair value of the conversion feature is determined each reporting period using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and is affected by changes in inputs to that model including our stock price, expected stock price volatility, interest rates and expected term. The assumptions used in valuing the derivative liability during 2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
Significant assumptions (weighted-average):
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate at grant date
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
75.43
|
%
|
|
Expected dividend payout
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Expected option life (in years)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Expected forfeiture rate
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
The following is a reconciliation of the derivative liability for 2017:
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
Value at December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
Initial value at the debt issuance
|
|
|
832,846
|
|
|
Decrease in value
|
|
|
(742,108
|
)
|
|
Value at December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
90,738
|
|
NOTE 12 – WARRANT AGREEMENTS
On January 3, 2017, the Company issued 1,300,000 warrants in connection with commissions earned in relation to the Company’s Private Label Exclusive Distribution and License agreement with Red Barn Pet Products, LLC.
From May 11, 2017 to December 31, 2017, the Company issued 360,000 warrants in connection with the issuance of $1,800,000 convertible promissory notes. The warrants have an exercise price of the lower of $7.00 per share or the price per share in the Company’s latest debt or equity financing greater than $3,000,000 and a term of 3 years.
Warrants that vest at the end of a one-year period are amortized over the vesting period using the straight-line method.
The Company’s warrant activity was as follows:
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted Average Contractual Remaining Life
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2016
|
|
|
4,392,107
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
6.17
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,660,000
|
|
|
|
3.08
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,300,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3.94
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Forfeited/Expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2017
|
|
|
4,752,107
|
|
|
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
3,101,026
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
3.93
|
|
The change in warrant value for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $1,181,057 and $607,906, respectively.
|
Range of
Exercise Price
|
|
Number of
Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Number of Warrants Exercisable
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
$1.00 - $7.00
|
|
|
4,752,107
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
|
|
$
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
3,101,026
|
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,752,107
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
|
|
$
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
3,101,026
|
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
The weighted-average fair value of warrants granted to during the year ended December 31, 2017 and year ended December 31, 2016, and the weighted-average significant assumptions used to determine those fair values, using a Black-Scholes-Merton (“Black-Scholes”) option pricing model are as follows:
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
Significant assumptions (weighted-average):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate at grant date
|
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
|
|
1.83
|
%
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
84.43
|
%
|
|
|
84.42
|
%
|
|
Expected dividend payout
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Expected option life (in years)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Expected forfeiture rate
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
NOTE 13 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Authorized Stock
The Company has authorized to issue is 75,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share.
As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were 23,901,252 and 23,336,673 shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.
Common Share Issuances
On April 7, 2017, the Company issued 14,579 common stock shares at $6.86 per share for consulting services to be performed over a one year period. The total value of this issuance was $100,000 and as of December 31, 2017, $26,575 is included in prepaid expenses and other assets.
On April 24, 2017, the Company issued 100,000 common stock shares at $7.00 per share for consulting services to be performed over a six month period. The total value of this issuance was $700,000.
On May 18, 2017, the Company issued 300,000 common stock shares at $2.10 per share for consulting services to be performed over a one year period. The total value of this issuance was $630,000 and as of December 31, 2017, $39,699 is included in prepaid expenses and other assets.
On August 21, 2017, the Company issued 100,000 common stock shares at $5.30 per share for consulting services to be performed over a four month period. The total value of this issuance was $530,000.
On October 15, 2017, the Company issued 50,000 common stock shares at $4.90 per share for consulting services to be performed over a one year period. The total value of this issuance was $245,000 and as of December 31, 2017, $192,644 is included in prepaid expenses and other assets.
Stock Payable
On December 14, 2017, the Company issued a $100,000 convertible promissory note to a company due June 14, 2018. In connection with issuance of this convertible promissory note, the Company is to issue 150,000 common stock shares at $2.05 per share per the terms of the convertible promissory note. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has not yet issued these common stock shares and thus the Company recorded a stock payable for $307,500.
On October 15, 2017, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement (“Agreement”) with an individual (“Consultant”) to provide business development advisory services. In consideration for the Consultant’s services provided, the Company shall grant 100,000 common stock shares, where 50,000 common stock shares shall be issued on October 15, 2017 and the remaining 50,000 common stock shares shall be granted to the Consultant within 90 days of execution of the Agreement. The Company issued 50,000 common stock shares at $4.90 per share for consulting services to be performed over a one year period on October 15, 2017. As the Company did not issue the remaining 50,000 common stock shares before the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a stock payable of $16,667, which is included in consulting expenses.
NOTE 14 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. The only significant matter of which the Company is aware of is discussed below.
On May 22, 2017, Sandy Sierra Garate (“Applicant”), an employee of the Company, filed an application for benefits due to serious and willful misconduct of the employer pursuant to labor code section 4553 with the State of California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB Case No: ADJ 10686812) resulting in injury arising out of and in the course of the Applicant’s employment on August 5, 2016. The Applicant is requesting relief in this matter for a one half increase in all compensation recoverable in connection with the injury of August 5, 2016, for the allowance of costs and expenses in an amount to be determined and for such further relief as is deemed appropriate. The Company is currently unable to determine what the additional expenses will be incurred in order to defend this matter. As such, the Company cannot determine whether there is a reasonable possibility that a loss will be incurred nor can it estimate the range of any such potential loss. Accordingly, the Company has not accrued an amount for any potential loss associated with this action.
Operating leases
The Company maintains its corporate offices and manufacturing facility at 1620 Beacon Place, Oxnard, CA 93033, which contains approximately 25,000 square feet. The Company is currently on a month-to-month lease, with a lease payment of $19,997 per month.
The Company also leases additional office and warehouse space at 1610 and 1612 Fiske Place, Oxnard, CA 93033, which contains approximately 6,547 square feet. The Company is currently on a month-to-month lease, with a lease payment of $4,763 per month.
The Company also leases additional research and development space at 2029 Becker Drive, Lawrence, KS 66047, which contains approximately 1,350 square feet. The Company is currently on a month-to-month lease, with a lease payment of $1,000 per month.
Total rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $294,646 and $286,539, respectively.
NOTE 15 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On various dates from October 31, 2014 to February 2, 2015, CURE Pharmaceutical issued convertible promissory notes to Ronick, Inc., (“Ronick”) totaling $89,000 that were due on February 25, 2016, but Ronick has agreed to extend the due date to August 31, 2016. Robert Davidson, our Chief Executive Officer and director, is a shareholder of Ronick. Interest is payable at 3% per annum and is secured by technology and patent rights. Principal and accrued interest is convertible into common stock at $4.00 per share. This conversion is subject to an adjustment if CURE Pharmaceutical sells stock or grants conversion rates at a lower price; however, Ronick has subsequently agreed to waive these conversion rights and will convert at $4.00 per share. As of October 6, 2016, Ronick has converted $35,260 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 8,815 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical. As of October 6, 2016, Ronick converted $35,290 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 8,822 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical.
On December 31, 2015, CURE Pharmaceutical converted $100,150 of accrued payroll for Robert Davidson into a convertible promissory note. As of October 6, 2016, Robert Davidson has converted $38,415 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 9,604 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical. On October 17, 2016, Robert Davidson transferred his convertible promissory note to Ronick. On that same date, Ronick converted $38,449 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 9,612 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical.
On December 31, 2015, CURE Pharmaceutical converted $94,312 of accrued payroll for Wayne Nasby, our Chief Operating Officer, into a convertible promissory note. As of October 6, 2016, Wayne Nasby has converted $48,241 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 12,060 of common stock shares of the CURE Pharmaceutical. As of October 17, 2016, Wayne Nasby converted $48,284 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 12,071 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical.
On December 31, 2015, CURE Pharmaceutical converted $77,250 of accrued payroll for Edward Maliski, our President and Chief Science Officer, into a convertible promissory note. As of October 6, 2016, Edward Maliski has converted $39,514 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 9,878 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical. As of October 17, 2016, Edward Maliski converted $39,549 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 9,887 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical.
On December 31, 2015, CURE Pharmaceutical converted $51,500 of accrued payroll for Jonathan Turman into a convertible promissory note. As of October 6, 2016, Jonathan Turman has converted $26,343 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 6,586 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical. As of October 17, 2016, Jonathan Turman converted $26,366 of principal and unpaid accrued interest into 6,591 of common stock shares of CURE Pharmaceutical.
At December 31, 2017, two of our executive officers, Robert Davidson and Mark Udell, had $7,931 and $13,716, respectively, due to them and are included in accounts payable. At December 31, 2016, one of our executive officers, Robert Davidson, had $10,992 due to him and is included in accounts payable.
NOTE 16 – INCOME TAXES
The Company utilizes FASB ASC740, “Income Taxes,” which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is “more likely-than-not” that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The tax reform bill that Congress voted to approve December 20, 2017, also known as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”, made sweeping modifications to the Internal Revenue Code, including a much lower corporate tax rate, changes to credits and deductions, and a move to a territorial system for corporations that have overseas earnings.
The act replaced the prior-law graduated corporate tax rate, which taxed income over $10 million at 35%, with a flat rate of 21%.
The Company generated a deferred tax asset through net operating loss carry-forwards. Management of the Company’s analysis indicates the net operating losses would be subject to significant limitations pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 382. The Company has not completed its IRC Section 382 Valuation, as required and the NOL’s because of potential Change of Ownerships might limit the usage or render the NOL’s completely worthless. Therefore, Management of the Company based upon Management’s evaluation has recorded a Full Valuation Reserve (100%), since it is more likely than not that no benefit will be realized for the Deferred Tax Assets.
Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or noncurrent depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The Company does not have any uncertain tax positions.
The total deferred tax asset is calculated by multiplying a domestic (US) 21 percent marginal tax rate by the cumulative Net Operating Loss Carryforwards (“NOL”). The Company currently has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $17,385,131, which expire through 2037. The deferred tax asset related to the NOL carryforwards Management has determined based on all the available information that a 100% Valuation reserve is required.
The provision for incomes taxes for the years ending December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Current expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Deferred income tax (liabilities) assets at December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
|
$
|
5,585,508
|
|
|
$
|
4,622,321
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
107,860
|
|
|
|
74,378
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
|
|
15,524
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
11,346
|
|
|
|
8,699
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
5,706,020
|
|
|
|
4,720,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
(353,750
|
)
|
|
|
(329,222
|
)
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(16,065
|
)
|
|
|
(23,120
|
)
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(5,336,205
|
)
|
|
|
(4,368,580
|
)
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(5,706,020
|
)
|
|
|
(4,720,922
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax, net
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
NOTE 17 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In connection with a Consulting Agreement with an individual, the Company issued the remaining 50,000 common stock shares at $1.48 per share on January 24, 2018 for consulting services to be performed over a one year period.
On January 30, 2018, the Company received in total $1,000,000 by issuing a convertible promissory note (“Convertible Note”) to an individual (“Holder”) that is due November 30, 2018 (“Maturity Date”). The Convertible Note shall accrue interest at 9% per annum, to be paid quarterly in cash on the last trading day of each fiscal quarter staring with June 30, 2018 and is unsecured. At any time after June 30, 2018 until the Maturity Date, the outstanding principal amount of this Note (the “Principal Amount”), plus all accrued but unpaid interest shall be convertible at the option of the Holder, in whole or in part, into shares of Common Stock, at any time and from time to time (the “Optional Conversion”), at a price per share equal to the average closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the OTC Markets for the five consecutive trading days prior to the delivery of the Notice of Conversion, (the “Optional Conversion Price”). If on or prior to the Maturity Date, the Company consummates its next bona fide sale of its preferred stock or Common Stock in excess of $4,000,000 in gross proceeds, in one transaction or a series of related transactions, which offering definitively sets a price per share of Common Stock or preferred stock and enables the Company to list its Common Stock on a national securities exchange (“Qualified Offering”), the entire Principal Amount of this Note shall be automatically converted into shares of Common Stock (the “Mandatory Conversion” and together with the Optional Conversion, the “Conversion”) at a price per share equal to 75% of the price of the Qualified Offering (the “Mandatory Conversion Price” together with Optional Conversion Price, the “Conversion Price”).
On February 20, 2018, (the “Effective Date”) the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement (“Agreement”) with an individual (“Consultant”) to perform strategic marketing and development services. The term of the Agreement is for one year from the Effective Date and the Company shall compensate the Consultant’s services by issuing 250,000 restricted common stock shares of the Company. As of the date of the Company’s filing of its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, the Company has not yet issued these restricted common stock shares.
On February 23, 2018, (the “Effective Date”) the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement (“Agreement”) with Liviakis Financial Communications, Inc. (“Consultant”) to perform services in investors’ communication and public relations with existing and prospective shareholders, brokers, dealers and other investment professionals with respect to the Company’s current and proposed activities. The term of the Agreement is for 30 months from the Effective Date and the Company shall compensate the Consultant’s services by issuing 1,000,000 restricted common stock shares of the Company. As of the date of the Company’s filing of its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, the Company has not yet issued these restricted common stock shares.
The Company has previously adopted and maintains the CURE Pharmaceutical Holding Corp. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), pursuant to which an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of the common stock of the Company remain available for grant as of the Company’s filing of its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. The Board of Directors have determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to provide an additional incentive for certain employees, including executive officers, and non-employee members of the Board of Directors of the Company by granting to them awards with respect to the common stock of the Company pursuant to the Plan. No awards have been granted as of the date of the Company’s filing of its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.
On March 20, 2018, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with investors (the “Investors”) for the sale of up to $5,000,000 of convertible promissory notes (“Convertible Notes”) that are due November 30, 2018 (“Maturity Date”). The Convertible Notes shall accrue interest at 9% per annum, to be paid quarterly in cash on the last trading day of each fiscal quarter beginning on June 30, 2018 and are unsecured. At any time after June 30, 2018 until the Maturity Date, the outstanding principal amounts of these Notes (the “Principal Amounts”), plus all accrued but unpaid interest shall be convertible at the option of the Holders, in whole or in part, into shares of the Company’s Common Stock, at any time and from time to time, at a price per share equal to the average closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the OTC Markets for the five consecutive trading days prior to the delivery of the notice of conversion, . If on or prior to the Maturity Date, the Company consummates its next bona fide sale of its preferred stock or Common Stock in excess of $4,000,000 in gross proceeds, in one transaction or a series of related transactions, which offering definitively sets a price per share of Common Stock or preferred stock and enables the Company to list its Common Stock on a national securities exchange (“Qualified Offering”), the entire Principal Amounts of these Notes shall be automatically converted into shares of Common Stock at a price per share equal to 75% of the price of the Qualified Offering. The Investors in this offering also received warrants (the “Warrants”) for the option to purchase equal to 50% of the shares of Common Stock that the Investor is entitled to receive in connection with the conversion of the Investor’s Note. The Warrants’ price per share shall equal the lower of (a) $2.00 or (b) 125% of the price per share of the Qualified Offering. The Warrants will have a three year term and shall be exercisable in cash.