We may offer and issue from time to time
common shares (the “Common Shares”), warrants to purchase Common Shares (the “Warrants”) and share purchase
contracts (all of the foregoing, collectively, the “Securities”) or any combination thereof up to an aggregate initial
offering price of $50,000,000 in one or more transactions under this shelf prospectus (which we refer to as the “Prospectus”).
Securities may be offered separately or together, at times, in amounts, at prices and on terms to be determined based on market
conditions at the time of sale and set forth in an accompanying shelf prospectus supplement (a “Prospectus Supplement”).
This Prospectus provides you with a general
description of the Securities that we may offer. Each time we offer Securities, we will provide you with a Prospectus Supplement
that describes specific information about the particular Securities being offered and may add, update or change information contained
or incorporated by reference in this Prospectus. You should read both this Prospectus and the Prospectus Supplement, together
with the additional information which is incorporated by reference into this Prospectus and the Prospectus Supplement.
Our outstanding common shares are listed
and posted for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) and the NYSE American LLC (“NYSE American”,
previously the NYSE MKT LLC), under the symbol “TMQ”. On November 20, 2017, the last reported sale price of the Common
Shares on the NYSE American was $0.936 per Common Share and on the TSX was Cdn$1.17 per Common Share. Unless otherwise specified
in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, Securities other than the Common Shares will not be listed on any securities exchange.
There is currently no market through which the Securities, other than the Common Shares, may be sold and you may not be able
to resell such Securities purchased under this Prospectus and any applicable Prospectus Supplement. This may affect the pricing
of such Securities in the secondary market, the transparency and availability of trading prices, the liquidity of the Securities,
and the extent of issuer regulation.
The offering of Securities hereunder is subject to approval of certain legal matters
on our behalf by Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, with respect to Canadian legal matters, and Dorsey & Whitney LLP, with
respect to U.S. legal matters and, except as otherwise set forth in any Prospectus Supplement, on behalf of any underwriters or
agents by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP with respect to U.S. legal matters.
Description of the Business
Our principal business is the exploration
and development of our Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects located in the Ambler mining district in Northwest Alaska, United States which
comprises (i) the Arctic Project, which contains the high-grade polymetallic volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit located on the
Ambler lands (“Arctic Project”); and (ii) the Bornite Project, which contains a carbonate-hosted copper deposit (“Bornite
Project”). Our goals include expanding mineral resources and advancing our projects through technical, engineering and feasibility
studies so that production decisions can be made on those projects.
Recent Developments
Filing
of the Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Bornite Project, Northwest Alaska, USA
On October 12, 2017, the Company filed
with the securities regulatory authorities in each of the provinces of Canada, an amended technical report for the Bornite Project
entitled “Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Bornite Project, Northwest Alaska, USA” dated October 12, 2017
with an effective date of April 19, 2016 (the “
2017 Bornite Report
”) prepared by Bruce Davis, FAUSIMM, Robert
Sim, P.Geo., and Jeff Austin, P.Eng, all of whom are “Qualified Persons” under National Instrument 43-101 –
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects
(“
NI 43-101
”) and are independent of the Company. The 2017
Bornite Report supersedes the Company’s previous technical report on the Bornite Project entitled “NI 43-101 Technical
Report on the Bornite Project, Northwest Alaska, USA” dated May 16, 2016 and having an effective date of April 19, 2016
(the “
2016 Bornite Report
”) and reflects non-material changes made to the 2016 Bornite Report which were made
at the request of the British Columbia Securities Commission. The summary of the Bornite Project contained in the Company’s
Form 10-K (as defined herein) remains accurate and complete.
Filing of the NI 43-101 Technical Report
on the Arctic Project, Northwest Alaska, USA
On November 9, 2017, the Company filed
with the securities regulatory authorities in each of the provinces of Canada, a technical report for the Company’s Arctic
Project entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Arctic Project, Northwest Alaska, USA” dated November 9, 2017
with an effective date of April 25, 2017 (the “
Arctic Report
”) prepared by Bruce Davis, Robert Sim and Jeff
Austin, all of whom are “Qualified Persons” under NI 43-101 and are independent of the Company. The resource estimate
included in the Arctic Report supersedes all previous resource estimates for the Arctic Project. See “
The Arctic Project
”.
Option Agreement
To Form Joint Venture with South32 Group Operations Pty Ltd.
On April 10, 2017, Trilogy entered into
an option agreement with NovaCopper US Inc. and South32 Group Operations Pty Ltd (“South32 Operations”), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of South32 Limited, which agreement was later assigned by South32 Operations to its affiliate, South32 USA Exploration
Inc. (together with South32 Operations, “South32”). The Agreement grants to South32 a three-year option to form a 50/50
joint venture with respect to Trilogy’s Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects.
South32 must contribute a minimum of US$10
million each year, for a maximum of three years, to keep the option in good standing (the “Initial Funding”). South32
may exercise its option at any time to form the 50/50 joint venture until the option expiration date. Provided that all the exploration
data and information related to approved programs has been made available to South32 by no later than December 31 of each year
in respect of the first two years, South32 must decide by January 31 of the following year whether; (i) to fund a further tranche
of a minimum of $10 million, or (ii) to withdraw and not provide any further annual funding. If the election to fund a further
tranche is not made in January, South32 has until the end of March to exercise the option to form the LLC and make the subscription
payment. If South32 elects to exercise the option, the subscription price less certain deductions for Initial Funding shall be
paid in one tranche within 45 business days. Should South32 not make its annual minimum payment or elect to withdraw, the option
will lapse and South32 will have no claim to ownership or to the funds it had already spent.
In order to exercise its option to form
the joint venture, South32 must contribute a minimum of US$150 million, plus (i) any amounts Trilogy spends at the Arctic Project
over the next three years up to US$5 million per year, less the amount of the Initial Funding contributed by South32, and (ii)
US$5 million if the option is exercised between April 1, 2018 and March 31, 2019 or US$10 million if the option is exercised between
April 1, 2019 and the expiration date of the option.
South32 has made the option payment for
the first year and the funds are being used for a US$10 million exploration program in 2017 at the Bornite Project.
The
Arctic Project
The following summary is derived from the
Arctic Report, and in some instances is a direct extract from, and based on the assumptions, qualifications and procedures set
out in, the Arctic Report. Such assumptions, qualifications and procedures are not fully described in this Prospectus and the
following summary does not purport to be a complete summary of the Arctic Report. Reference should be made to the full text of
the Arctic Report which is available on the Company’s website (
https://trilogymetals.com/
) and has been filed with
the securities regulatory authorities in each of the provinces of Canada on SEDAR (www.sedar.com).
Project Description, Location and
Access
Location
The Arctic Property is located in the Ambler
mining district of the southern Brooks Range, in the NWAB of Alaska. The Arctic Property is located in Ambler River A-2 quadrangle,
Kateel River Meridian T 20N, R 11E, section 2 and T 21N, R 11E, sections 34 and 35.
The Arctic Project is located 270 km east
of the town of Kotzebue, 37 km northeast of the village of Kobuk, and 260 km west of the Dalton Highway, an all-weather state
maintained public road, at geographic coordinates N67.17° latitude and W156.39° longitude (Universal Transverse Mercator
(UTM) North American Datum (NAD) 83, Zone 4 coordinates 7453080N, 613110E).
Accessibility
Air
Primary access to the Arctic Property is
by air, using both fixed wing aircraft and helicopters.
There are four well maintained, approximately
1,500 m-long gravel airstrips located near the Arctic Property, capable of accommodating charter fixed wing aircraft. These airstrips
are located 64 km west at Ambler, 46 km southwest at Shungnak, 37 km southwest at Kobuk, and 34 km southwest at Dahl Creek. There
is daily commercial air service from Kotzebue to the village of Kobuk, the closest community to the Arctic Property. During the
summer months, the Dahl Creek Camp airstrip is suitable for larger aircraft, such as a C-130 and DC-6.
In addition to the four 1,500 m airstrips,
there is a 700 m airstrip located at the Bornite Camp. The airstrip at Bornite is suited to smaller aircraft, which support the
Bornite Camp with personnel and supplies. There is also a 450m airstrip (“
Arctic Airstrip
”) located at the
base of Arctic ridge that is suited to support smaller aircraft.
Water
There is no direct water access to the
Arctic Property. During spring runoff, river access is possible by barge from Kotzebue Sound to Ambler, Shungnak, and Kobuk via
the Kobuk River.
Road
A winter trail and a one-lane dirt track
suitable for high-clearance vehicles or construction equipment links the Arctic Project’s main camp located at Bornite to
the 1525m Dahl Creek airstrip southwest of the Arctic Deposit. An unimproved gravel track connects the Arctic Airstrip with the
Arctic Deposit.
Mineral Tenure
The Arctic Property comprises approximately
46,226 ha of State of Alaska mining claims and US Federal patented mining claims in the Kotzebue Recording District. The Arctic
Project land tenure consists of 1,386 contiguous claims, including 883 40-acre State claims, 503 160-acre State claims, and eighteen
Federal patented claims comprising 272 acres (110 ha) held in the name of NovaCopper US Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Trilogy.
The Arctic Project is located near the southern edge of the centre of the claim block. The Federal patented claim corners were
located by the US Geological Survey. There is no expiration date or labour requirement on the Federal patented claims. Rent for
each State claim is paid annually to the Alaska Department of Natural Resources. An Annual Labour Statement must be submitted
annually to maintain the State claims in good standing.
Royalties,
Agreements and Encumbrances
Kennecott Agreements
On March 22, 2004, Alaska Gold Company,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of NovaGold Resources Inc. (“
NovaGold
”) completed an Exploration and Option to Earn
an Interest Agreement with Kennecott Exploration Company and Kennecott Arctic Company (collectively, “
Kennecott
”)
on the Ambler land holdings.
On December 18, 2009, a Purchase and Termination
Agreement was entered into between Alaska Gold Company and Kennecott whereby NovaGold agreed to pay Kennecott a total purchase
price of $29 million for a 100% interest in the Ambler land holdings, which included the Arctic Project, to be paid as: $5 million
by issuing 931,098 NovaGold shares, and two installments of $12 million each, due 12 months and 24 months from the closing date
of January 7, 2010. The NovaGold shares were issued in January 2010, the first $12 million payment was made on January 7, 2011,
and the second $12 million payment was made in advance on August 5, 2011; this terminated the March 22, 2004 exploration agreement
between NovaGold and Kennecott. Under the Purchase and Termination Agreement, the seller retained a 1% net smelter return (“
NSR
”)
royalty that is purchasable at any time by the land owner for a one-time payment of $10 million.
During 2011, NovaGold incorporated NovaCopper
US Inc. and transferred its Ambler land holdings, including the Arctic Project, from Alaska Gold Company to NovaCopper US Inc.
In April 2012, NovaGold completed a spin-out of NovaCopper Inc., a publicly traded company listed on the TSX and NYSE-MKT stock
exchanges and owned by the same shareholders as NovaGold. In September of 2016, NovaCopper Inc. changed its name to Trilogy Metals
Inc.
NANA Agreement
In 1971, the US Congress passed the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act (“
ANCSA
”) which settled land and financial claims made by the Alaska Natives and
provided for the establishment of 13 regional corporations to administer those claims. These 13 corporations are known as the
Alaska Native Regional Corporations. One of these 13 regional corporations is the Northwest Alaska Native Association Regional
Corporation, Inc. (“
NANA
”). ANCSA Lands controlled by NANA bound the southern border of the Arctic Property
claim block. National Park lands are within 25 km of the northern property border.
On October 19, 2011, Trilogy and NANA
Regional Corporation, Inc. entered into an Exploration Agreement and Option to Lease (the “
NANA Agreement
”)
for the cooperative development of their respective resource interests in the Ambler mining district. The NANA Agreement consolidates
Trilogy’s and NANA’s land holdings and provides a framework for the exploration and development of the area. The NANA
Agreement provides that NANA will grant Trilogy the nonexclusive right to enter on, and the exclusive right to explore, the Bornite
Lands and the ANCSA Lands (each as defined in the NANA Agreement) and in connection therewith, to construct and utilize temporary
access roads, camps, airstrips and other incidental works. The NANA Agreement has a term of 20 years, with an option in favour
of Trilogy to extend the term for an additional 10 years. The NANA Agreement may be terminated by mutual agreement of the parties
or by NANA if Trilogy does not meet certain expenditure requirements on NANA’s lands.
If, following receipt of a feasibility
study and the release for public comment of a related draft environmental impact statement, Trilogy decides to proceed with construction
of a mine on the lands subject to the NANA Agreement, Trilogy will notify NANA in writing and NANA will have 120 days to elect
to either (a) exercise a non-transferrable back-in-right to acquire between 16% and 25% (as specified by NANA) of that specific
project; or (b) not exercise its back-in-right, and instead receive a net proceeds royalty equal to 15% of the net proceeds realized
by Trilogy from such project. The cost to exercise such back-in-right is equal to the percentage interest in the Project multiplied
by the difference between (i) all costs incurred by Trilogy or its affiliates on the project, including historical costs incurred
prior to the date of the NANA Agreement together with interest on the historical costs; and (ii) $40 million (subject to exceptions).
This amount will be payable by NANA to Trilogy in cash at the time the parties enter into a joint venture agreement and in no
event will the amount be less than zero.
In the event that NANA elects to exercise
its back-in-right, the parties will, as soon as reasonably practicable, form a joint venture with NANA electing to participate
between 16% to 25%, and Trilogy owning the balance of the interest in the joint venture. Upon formation of the joint venture,
the joint venture will assume all of the obligations of Trilogy and be entitled to all the benefits of Trilogy under the NANA
Agreement in connection with the mine to be developed and the related lands. A party’s failure to pay its proportionate
share of costs in connection with the joint venture will result in dilution of its interest. Each party will have a right of first
refusal over any proposed transfer of the other party’s interest in the joint venture other than to an affiliate or for
the purposes of granting security. A transfer by either party of an NSR return on the project or any net proceeds royalty interest
in a project other than for financing purposes will also be subject to a first right of refusal.
In connection with possible development
on the Bornite Lands or ANCSA Lands, Trilogy and NANA will execute a mining lease to allow Trilogy or the joint venture to construct
and operate a mine on the Bornite Lands or ANCSA Lands. These leases will provide NANA a 2% NSR as to production from the Bornite
Lands and a 2.5% NSR as to production from the ANCSA Lands.
If Trilogy decides to proceed with construction
of a mine on its own lands subject to the NANA Agreement, NANA will enter into a surface use agreement with Trilogy which will
afford Trilogy access to the project along routes approved by NANA. In consideration for the grant of such surface use rights,
Trilogy will grant NANA a 1% NSR on production and an annual payment of $755 per acre (as adjusted for inflation each year beginning
with the second anniversary of the effective date of the NANA Agreement and for each of the first 400 acres (and $100 for each
additional acre) of the lands owned by NANA and used for access which are disturbed and not reclaimed.
History
Prospectors first arrived in the Ambler
District around 1900, shortly after the discovery of the Nome and Fairbanks gold districts. Several small gold placer deposits
were located in the southern Cosmos Hills south of the Arctic Deposit and worked intermittently over the next few years. During
this time copper mineralization was observed at Ruby Creek in the northern Cosmos Hills; however, no exploration was undertaken
until 1947 when local prospector Rhinehart “Rhiny” Berg located outcropping mineralization along Ruby Creek. Berg
subsequently staked claims over the Ruby Creek showings and constructed an airstrip for access.
Bear Creek Mining Company (“
BCMC
”),
an exploration subsidiary of Kennecott, optioned the property from Berg in 1957. The prospect became known as Bornite and Kennecott
conducted extensive exploration over the next decade, culminating in the discovery of the high-grade No. 1 orebody and the sinking
of an exploration shaft to conduct underground drilling.
In conjunction with the discovery of the
Bornite Deposit, BCMC greatly expanded their regional reconnaissance exploration in the Cosmos Hills and the southern Brooks Range.
Stream silt sampling in 1966 revealed a significant copper anomaly in Arctic Creek roughly 27 km northeast of Bornite. The area
was subsequently staked and, in 1967, eight core holes were drilled at the Arctic Deposit yielding impressive massive sulphide
intercepts over an almost 500-m strike length.
BCMC conducted intensive exploration on
the property until 1977 and then intermittently through 1998. No drilling or additional exploration was conducted on the Arctic
Project between 1998 and 2004.
In addition to drilling and exploration
at the Arctic Deposit, BCMC also conducted exploration at numerous other prospects in the Ambler District (most notably Dead Creek,
Sunshine, Cliff, and Horse). The abundance of volcanogenic massive sulphide (“
VMS
”) prospects in the district
resulted in a series of competing companies, including Sunshine Mining Company, Anaconda, Noranda, Teck Cominco, Resource Associates
of Alaska (“
RAA
”), Watts, Griffis and McOuat Ltd., and Houston Oil and Minerals Company, culminating into a
claim staking war in the district in 1973.
District exploration by Sunshine Mining
Company and Anaconda resulted in two additional significant discoveries in the district; the Sun Deposit located 60 km east of
the Arctic Deposit, and the Smucker Deposit located 36 km west of the Arctic Deposit.
District exploration continued until the
early 1980s on the four larger deposits in the district (Arctic, Bornite, Smucker and Sun) when the district fell into a hiatus
due to depressed metal prices.
In 1987, Cominco acquired the claims covering
the Sun and Smucker deposits from Anaconda. Teck Resources Ltd., as Cominco’s successor company, continues to hold the Smucker
Deposit. In 2007, Andover Mining Corporation purchased a 100% interest in the Sun Deposit for US$13 million.
In 1981 and 1983, Kennecott received three
US Mineral Survey patents (MS2245 totalling 240 acres over the Arctic Deposit – later amended to include another 32 acres;
and MS2233 and MS2234 for 25 claims totalling 516.5 acres at Bornite). The Bornite patented claims and surface development were
subsequently sold to NANA Regional Corporation, Inc. in 1986.
No production has occurred at the Arctic
Deposit or at any of the other deposits within the Ambler District.
Prior Ownership
and Ownership Changes – Arctic Deposit and the Ambler Lands
BCMC initially staked federal mining claims
covering the Arctic Deposit area beginning in 1965. The success of the 1960’s drill programs defined a significant high-grade
polymetallic resource at the Arctic Deposit and, in the early 1970s, Kennecott began the patent process to obtain complete legal
title to the Arctic Deposit. In 1981, Kennecott received US Mineral Survey patent M2245 covering 16 mining claims totalling 240.018
acres. In 1983, US Mineral Survey patent M2245 was amended to include two additional claims totalling 31.91 acres.
With the passage of the Alaska National
Interest Lands Conservation Act in 1980, which expedited native land claims outlined in the ANSCA and state lands claims under
the Alaska Statehood Act, both the state of Alaska and NANA selected significant areas of land within the Ambler District. State
selections covered much of the Ambler schist belt, host to the VMS deposits including the Arctic Deposit, while NANA selected
significant portions of the Ambler Lowlands to the immediate south of the Arctic Deposit as well as much of the Cosmos Hills including
the area immediately around Bornite.
In 1995, Kennecott renewed exploration
in the Ambler schist belt containing the Arctic Deposit patented claims by staking an additional 48 state claims at Nora and 15
state claims at Sunshine Creek. In the fall of 1997, Kennecott staked 2,035 state claims in the belt consolidating their entire
land position and acquiring the majority of the remaining prospective terrain in the VMS belt. Five more claims were subsequently
added in 1998. After a short period of exploration which focused on geophysics and geochemistry combined with limited drilling,
exploration work on the Arctic Project again entered a hiatus.
On March 22, 2004, Alaska Gold Company,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of NovaGold completed an Exploration and Option Agreement with Kennecott to earn an interest in the
Ambler land holdings.
Previous
Exploration and Development Results – Arctic Deposit
Introduction
Kennecott’s tenure at the Arctic
Project saw two periods of intensive work from 1965 to 1985 and from 1993 to 1998, before optioning the property to NovaGold in
2004.
Though abundant reports, memos, and files
exist in Kennecott’s Salt Lake City office, only limited digital compilation of the data exists for the earliest generation
of exploration at the Arctic Deposit and within the VMS belt. Beginning in 1993, Kennecott initiated a re-evaluation of the Arctic
Deposit and assembled a computer database of previous work at the Arctic Deposit and in the district. A new computer-generated
block model was constructed in 1995 and an updated resource of the deposit was calculated from the block model. Subsequently,
Kennecott staked a total of 2,035 State of Alaska claims in 1997 and, in 1998 undertook the first field program since 1985.
Due to the plethora of companies and the
patchwork exploration that occurred as a result of the 1973 staking war, much of the earliest exploration work on what now constitutes
the Ambler Schist belt was lost during the post-1980 hiatus in district exploration. The following subsections outline the best
documented data at the Arctic Deposit as summarized in the 1998 Kennecott exploration report, including the assembled computer
database; however, this outline is not considered to be either exhaustive or in-depth.
In 1982, geologists with Kennecott, Anaconda
and the State of Alaska published the definitive geologic map of the Ambler schist belt.
Geochemistry
Historic geochemistry for the district,
compiled in the 1998 Kennecott database, includes 2,255 soil samples, 922 stream silt samples, 363 rock samples, and 37 panned
concentrate samples. Data has been sourced from several companies including Kennecott, Sunshine Mining, RAA, and NANA. Sourcing
of much of the data had been poorly documented in the database.
During 1998, Kennecott renewed its effort
in the district, and, as a follow-up to the 1998 electromagnetic (“
EM
”) survey, undertook soil and rock chip
sampling in and around EM anomalies generated in the geophysical targeting effort. During this period Kennecott collected 962
soils and 107 rocks and for the first time used extensive multi-element inductively coupled plasma (“
ICP
”)
analysis.
Geophysics
Prior to 1998, Kennecott conducted a series
of geophysical surveys which are poorly documented or are unavailable to Trilogy. With the renewed interest in the belt, Kennecott
mounted a largely geophysically driven program to assess the district for Arctic-sized targets. Based on an initial review of
earlier geophysical techniques employed at the Arctic Deposit, Kennecott initiated an extensive helicopter-supported airborne
EM and magnetic survey covering the entire VMS belt in March 1998. The survey was conducted on 400 m line spacing with selective
200 m line spacing at the Arctic Deposit and covered 2,509 total line kilometres. The Arctic Deposit presented a strong 900 Hz
EM conductive signature.
Forty-six additional discrete EM conductors
were identified, of which, 17 were further evaluated in the field. Eight of the EM anomalies were coincident with anomalous geochemistry
and prospective geology, and were deemed to have significant potential for mineralization. As a follow-up, each anomaly was located
on the ground using a Maxmin 2 horizontal loop EM system. Gravity lines were subsequently completed utilizing a LaCoste and Romberg
Model G gravimeter over each of the eight anomalies.
In addition to the EM and gravity surveys
in 1998, five lines of Controlled Source Audio Magnetotelluric (“
CSAMT
”) data were collected in the Arctic
Valley. The Arctic Deposit showed an equally strong conductive response in the CSAMT data as was seen in the EM data. As a result
of the survey, Kennecott recommended additional CSAMT for the deposit area.
Field targeting work in 1998 prompted Kennecott
to drill two exploration holes on anomaly 98-3, located approximately 6 km northwest of the Arctic Deposit and 2 km east-northeast
of the Dead Creek prospect. Hole 98-03-01 was drilled to test the sub-cropping gossan and was roughly coincident with the centre
of the geophysical anomaly as defined by airborne and ground EM data. Scattered mineralization was encountered throughout the
hole with intervals of chalcopyrite and sphalerite.
Based on the results of the 1998 geophysical
program, Kennecott made the following recommendations:
|
·
|
anomaly
98-3 requires further drilling;
|
|
·
|
anomalies
98-7 and 98-22 are drill ready; and
|
|
·
|
anomalies
98-8, -9, -14, -35, and -38 require additional ground targeting.
|
Kennecott conducted no further field exploration
in the district after 1998 and subsequently optioned the property to NovaGold in 2004.
Drilling
Between 1967 and July 1985, Kennecott (BCMC)
completed 86 holes (including 14 large diameter metallurgical test holes) totalling 16,080 m. In 1998, Kennecott drilled an additional
6 core holes totalling 1,492 m to test for:
|
·
|
extensions
of the known Arctic resource;
|
|
·
|
grade
and thickness continuity; and
|
Drilling for all BCMC/Kennecott campaigns
in the Arctic Deposit area (1966 to 1998) totals 92 core holes for a combined 17,572 m. A complete and comprehensive discussion
of the all the drilling undertaken at the Arctic Deposit is contained under the heading “
The Arctic Project – Drilling
”.
Specific Gravity
Prior to 1998, no specific gravity (“
SG
”)
measurements were available for the Arctic Deposit rocks. A “factored” average bulk density was used to calculate
a tonnage factor for resource estimations. A total of 38 samples from the 1998 drilling at the Arctic Deposit were measured for
SG determinations. This included six samples of unaltered metavolcanics, ten samples of graphitic schist and talc schist lithology,
seven samples of semi-massive sulfide (“
SMS
”), and fifteen samples of massive sulfide (“
MS
”).
A complete and comprehensive discussion
of SG determinations captured during both the Kennecott and Trilogy/NovaGold tenures are discussed under the headings “
The
Arctic Project – Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification
” and “
The Arctic Project – Mineral Resource
Estimate
”.
Petrology, Mineralogy
and Research Studies
There have been numerous internal studies
done by Kennecott on the petrology and mineralogy of the Arctic Deposit that exist as internal memos, file notes, and reports
from as early as 1967, as well as several academic studies.
Geotechnical,
Hydrological and Acid-Base Accounting Studies
A series of geotechnical, hydrological
and acid-base accounting (“
ABA
”) studies were conducted by Kennecott before their divestiture of the Arctic
Project to NovaGold.
Geotechnical Studies
In December 1998, URSA Engineering prepared
a geotechnical study for Kennecott titled “Arctic Project – 1998 Rock Mass Characterization”. Though general
in scope, the report summarized some of the basic rock characteristics as follows:
|
·
|
Compressive
strengths average 6,500 psi for the quartz mica schists, 14,500 psi for the graphitic
schists, and 4,000 psi for talc schists.
|
|
·
|
Rock
mass quality can be described as average to good quality, massive with continuous jointing
except the talc schist, which was characterized as poor quality. The rock mass rating
averages 40 to 50 for most units except the talc schist which averages 30.
|
Hydrological Studies
In 1998, Robertson Geoconsultants Inc.
(“
Robertson
”) of Vancouver prepared a report for Kennecott titled “Initial Assessment of Geochemical
and Hydrological Conditions at Kennecott’s Arctic Project”. The report presented the results of the acid generation
potential of mine waste and wall rock for the Arctic Project in the context of a hydrological assessment of the climate, hydrology
and water balance analyses at the Arctic Deposit. Climatic studies at the time were limited to regional analyses as no climatic
data had been collected at the Arctic Project site prior to the review. Regional data, most specifically a government installed
gauging station about 20 miles to the southwest at Dahl Creek, provided information in assessing the hydrology of the Arctic Project
at the time. A total of nine regional gauges were utilized to evaluate the overall potential runoff in the area.
Acid-Base Accounting
Studies
The 1998 Robertson study documented acid-base
accounting results based on the selection of 60 representative core samples from the deposit. Results of the study are summarized
as follows:
|
·
|
Roughly
70% of the waste rock material was deemed to be potentially acid generating.
|
|
·
|
Mitigation
of the acid generating capacity could be affected by submersion of the waste rock. Mitigation
of the high wall and pit geometries would make potential pit flooding unlikely and could
present a long term mitigation issue.
|
|
·
|
Characteristics
of the mine tailings were not assessed.
|
|
·
|
Based
on the study, Robertson recommended underground mining scenarios, or aggressive study
including site water balance.
|
Historical
Mineral Resource Estimates
For more information about the prior exploration,
including the type, amount and results of any exploration work undertaken by previous owners at the Arctic Project and a summary
of historical mineral resource estimates, please see the full text of the Arctic Report.
Geological Setting, Mineralization and
Deposit Types
Regional
Geology – Southern Brooks Range
The Ambler District occurs along the southern
margin of Brooks Range within an east-west trending zone of Devonian to Jurassic age submarine volcanic and sedimentary rocks.
The district covers both: 1) VMS-like deposits and prospects hosted in the Devonian age Ambler Sequence (or Ambler Schist belt),
a group of metamorphosed bimodal volcanic rocks with interbedded tuffaceous, graphitic and calcareous volcaniclastic metasediments;
and 2) epigenetic carbonate-hosted copper deposits occurring in Devonian age carbonate and phyllitic rocks of the Bornite Carbonate
Sequence. The Ambler Sequence occurs in the upper part of the Anirak Schist, the thickest member of the Schist belt or Coldfoot
subterrane (Moore et al. 1994). VMS-like stratabound mineralization can be found along the entire 110 km strike length of the
district. Immediately south of the Schist belt in the Cosmos Hills, a time equivalent section of the Anirak Schist includes the
approximately 1 km thick Bornite Carbonate Sequence. Mineralization of both the VMS-like deposits of the Schist belt and the carbonate-hosted
deposits of the Cosmos Hills has been dated at 375 to 387 Ma.
In addition, the Ambler District is characterized
by increasing metamorphic grade north perpendicular to the strike of the east-west trending units. The district shows isoclinal
folding in the northern portion and thrust faulting to south. The Devonian to Late Jurassic age Angayucham basalt and the Triassic
to Jurassic age mafic volcanic rocks are in low-angle over thrust contact with various units of the Ambler Schist belt and Bornite
Carbonate Sequence along the northern edge of the Ambler Lowlands.
Terrane Descriptions
The terminology of terranes in the southern
Brooks Range evolved during the 1980s because of the region’s complex juxtaposition of rocks of various composition, age
and metamorphic grade. Certain studies have divided the Ambler District into the Ambler and Angayucham terranes. Recent work includes
the rocks of the previously defined Ambler terrane as part of the regionally extensive Schist belt or Coldfoot subterrane along
the southern flank of the Arctic Alaska terrane. In general, the southern Brooks Range is composed of east-west trending structurally
bound allochthons of variable metasedimentary and volcanogenic rocks of Paleozoic age.
The Angayucham terrane, which lies along
southern margin of the Brooks Range, is locally preserved as a klippen within the eastern Cosmos Hills and is composed of weakly
metamorphosed to unmetamorphosed massive-to-pillowed basalt rocks with minor radiolarian cherts, marble lenses and isolated ultramafic
rocks. This package of Devonian to Late Jurassic age mafic and ultramafic rocks is interpreted to represent portions of an obducted
and structurally dismembered ophiolite that formed in an ocean basin south of the present day Brooks Range. Locally, the Angayucham
terrane overlies the schist belt to the north along a poorly exposed south-dipping structure.
Gottschalk and Oldow (1988) describe the
Schist belt as a composite of structurally bound packages composed of dominantly greenschist facies rocks, including pelitic to
semi-pelitic quartz-mica schist with associated mafic schists, metagabbro and marbles. Locally, the Schist belt includes the middle
Devonian age Bornite Carbonate Sequence, the lower Paleozoic age Anirak pelitic, variably siliceous and graphic schists, and the
mineralized Devonian age Ambler sequence consisting of volcanogenic and siliciclastic rocks variably associated with marbles,
calc-schists, metabasites and mafic schists. The lithologic assemblage of the Schist belt is consistent with an extensional, epicontinental
tectonic origin.
Structurally overlaying the Schist belt
to the north is the Central belt. The Central belt is in unconformable contact with the Schist belt along a north-dipping low-angle
structure. The Central belt consists of lower Paleozoic age metaclastic and carbonate rocks, and Proterozoic age schists. Both
the Central belt and Schist belt are intruded by meta-to-peraluminous orthogneisses, which locally yield a slightly discordant
U-Pb thermal ionization mass spectrometry zircon crystallization age of middle to late Devonian. This igneous protolith age is
supported by Devonian orthogneiss ages obtained along the Dalton Highway, 161 km to the east of the Ambler District.
Overlaying the Schist belt to the south
is the Phyllite belt, characterized in the Ambler mining district as phyllitic black carbonaceous schists of the Beaver Creek
Phyllite which is assumed to underlie much of the Ambler Lowlands between the Brooks Range and the Arctic Deposit to the north
and the Cosmos Hills and the Bornite Deposit to the south. The recessive weathering nature of the Beaver creek phyllite limits
the exposure but is assumed to occur as a thrust sheet overlying the main Schist belt rocks.
Regional Tectonic
Setting
Rocks exposed along the southern Brooks
Range consist of structurally bound imbricate allochthons that have experienced an intense and complex history of deformation
and metamorphism. Shortening in the fold and thrust belt has been estimated by some workers to exceed 500 km based on balanced
cross sections across the central Brooks Range. In general, the metamorphic grade and tectonism in the Brooks Range increases
to the south and is greatest in the Schist belt. The tectonic character and metamorphic grade decreases south of the Schist belt
in the overlaying Angayucham terrane.
In the late Jurassic to early Cretaceous
age, the Schist belt experienced penetrative thrust-related deformation accompanied by recrystallization under high-pressure and
low-temperature metamorphic conditions. The northward directed compressional tectonics were likely related to crustal thickening
caused by obduction of the Angayucham ophiolitic section over a south-facing passive margin. Thermobarometry of schists from the
structurally deepest section of the northern Schist belt yield relict metamorphic temperatures of 475°C, ±35°C,
and pressures from 7.6 to 9.8 kb. Metamorphism in the schist belt grades from lowest greenschist facies in the southern Cosmos
Hills to upper greenschist facies, locally overprinting blueschist mineral assemblages in the northern belt.
Compressional tectonics, which typically
place older rocks on younger, do not adequately explain the relationship of young, low-metamorphic-grade over older and higher-grade
metamorphic rocks observed in the southern Brooks Range hinterland. Mull (1982) interpreted the Schist belt as a late antiformal
uplift of the basement to the fold and thrust belt. More recent models propose that the uplift of the structurally deep Schist
belt occurred along duplexed, north-directed, thin-skinned thrust faults, followed by post-compressional south-dipping low angle
normal faults along the south flank of the Schist belt, accommodating for an over-steepened imbricate thrust stack. Rapid cooling
and exhumation of the Schist belt began at the end of the early Cretaceous age at 105 to 103 Ma, based on Ar40/Ar39 cooling ages
of hornblende and white mica near Mount Igikpak, and lasted only a few million years. Additional post-extension compressive events
during the Paleocene age further complicate the southern Brooks Range.
Ambler Sequence
Geology
Rocks that form the Ambler Sequence consist
of a lithologically diverse sequence of lower Paleozoic Devonian age carbonate and siliciclastic strata with interlayered mafic
lava flows and sills. The clastic strata, derived from terrigenous continental and volcanic sources, were deposited primarily
by mass-gravity flow into the sub-wavebase environment of an extending marginal basin.
The Ambler Sequence underwent two periods
of intense, penetrative deformation. Sustained upper greenschist-facies metamorphism with coincident formation of a penetrative
schistosity and isoclinal transposition of bedding marks the first deformation period. Pervasive similar-style folds on all scales
deform the transposed bedding and schistosity, defining the subsequent event. At least two later non-penetrative compressional
events deform these earlier fabrics. Observations of the structural and metamorphic history of the Ambler District are consistent
with current tectonic evolution models for the Schist belt, based on the work of others elsewhere in the southern Brooks Range.
General Stratigraphy
of the Ambler Sequence
Though the Ambler Sequence is exposed over
110 km of strike length, descriptions and comments herein will refer to an area between the Kogoluktuk River on the east and the
Shungnak River on the west where Trilogy has focused the majority of its exploration efforts over the last decade.
The local base of the Ambler Sequence consists
of variably metamorphosed carbonates historically referred to as the Gnurgle Gneiss. Trilogy interprets these strata as calc-turbidites,
perhaps deposited in a sub-wavebase environment adjacent to a carbonate bank. Calcareous schists overlie the Gnurgle Gneiss and
host sporadically distributed mafic sills and pillowed lavas. These fine-grained clastic strata indicate a progressively quieter
depositional environment up section, and the presence of pillowed lavas indicates a rifting, basinal environment.
Overlying these basal carbonates and pillowed
basalts is a section of predominantly fine-grained carbonaceous siliciclastic rocks which host a significant portion of the mineralization
in the district including the Arctic Deposit. This quiescent section indicates further isolation from a terrigenous source terrain.
The section above the Arctic Deposit host
stratigraphy contains voluminous reworked silicic volcanic strata with the Button Schist at its base. The Button Schist is a regionally
continuous and distinctive albite porphyroblastic unit that serves as an excellent marker above the main mineralized stratigraphy.
The paucity of volcanically derived strata below the Arctic Deposit host section and abundance above indicates that the basin
and surrounding hinterlands underwent major tectonic reorganization during deposition of the Arctic Deposit section. Greywacke
sands that Trilogy interpret as channeled high-energy turbidites occur throughout the section but concentrate high in the local
stratigraphy.
Several rock units show substantial change
in thickness and distribution in the vicinity of the Arctic Deposit that may have resulted from the basin architecture existing
at the time of deposition. Between the Arctic Ridge, geographically above the Arctic Deposit, and the Riley Ridge to the west
several significant differences have been documented including:
|
·
|
The
Gnurgle Gneiss is thickest in exposures along the northern extension of Arctic Ridge
and appears to thin to the west.
|
|
·
|
Mafic
lavas and sills thicken from east to west. They show thick occurrences in upper Subarctic
Creek and to the west, but are sparsely distributed to the east.
|
|
·
|
The
quartzite section within and above the Arctic sulphide horizon does not occur in abundance
east of Arctic Ridge; it is thicker and occurs voluminously to the west.
|
|
·
|
Button
Schist thickens dramatically to the west from exposures on Arctic Ridge; exposures to
the east are virtually nonexistent.
|
|
·
|
Greywacke
sands do not exist east of Subarctic Creek but occur in abundance as massive, channeled
accumulations to the west, centered on Riley Ridge.
|
These data are interpreted by Trilogy to
define a generally north-northwest-trending depocentre through the central Ambler District. Volcanic debris flow occurrences described
below in concert with these formational changes suggest that the depocentre had a fault-controlled eastern margin. The basin deepened
to the west; the Riley Ridge section deposited along a high-energy axis, and the COU section lies to the west-southwest distally
from a depositional energy point of view. This original basin architecture appears to have controlled mineralization of the sulphide
systems at Arctic and Shungnak (Dead Creek), concentrating fluid flow along structures on the eastern basin margin.
Structural Framework
of the Ambler District
In addition to the underlying pre-deformational
structural framework of the district suggested by the stratigraphic thickening of various facies around the Arctic Deposit, the
Ambler Sequence is deformed by two penetrative deformational events that significantly complicate the distribution and spatial
arrangement of the local stratigraphy.
F1 Deformation
The earliest penetrative deformation event
is associated with greenschist metamorphism and the development of regional schistosity. True isoclinal folds are developed and
fold noses typically are thickened. The most notable F1 fold is the Arctic antiform that defines the upper and lower limbs of
the Arctic Deposit. The fold closes along a north-northeast- trending fold axis roughly mimicking the trace of Subarctic Creek
and opening to the east. Importantly, the overturned lower limb implies that the permissive stratigraphy should be repeated on
a lower synformal isocline beneath the currently explored limbs and would connect with the permissive mineralized stratigraphy
to the northwest at Shungnak (Dead Creek).
F2 Deformation
The earlier F1 schistosity is in turn deformed
by the F2 deformational event that resulted in the local development of an axial planar cleavage. The deformational event is well
defined throughout the Schist belt and results in a series of south verging open to moderately overturned folds that define a
series of east-west trending folds of similar vergence across the entire Schist belt stratigraphies.
This event is likely temporarily related
to the emplacement of the Devonian Angayucham volcanics, the obducted Jurassic ophiolites and Cretaceous sediments over the Schist
belt stratigraphies.
In addition to the earlier penetrative
deformation events, a series of poorly defined non-penetrative deformation likely as a consequence of Cretaceous extension are
seen as a series of warps or arches across the district.
The interplay between the complex local
stratigraphy, the isoclinal F1 event, the overturned south verging F2 event and the series of post-penetrative deformational events
makes district geological interpretation often extremely difficult at a local scale.
Arctic Deposit
Geology
Previous workers at the Arctic Deposit
describe three mineralized horizons at the Arctic Deposit: the Main Sulphide Horizon, the Upper South Horizon and the Warm Springs
Horizon. The Main Sulphide Horizon was further subdivided into three zones: the southeast zone, the central zone and the northwest
zone. Previous deposit modelling was grade-based resulting in numerous individual mineralized zones representing relatively thin
sulphide horizons.
Recent work by Trilogy define the Arctic
Deposit as two or more discrete horizons of sulphide mineralization contained in a complexly deformed isoclinal fold with an upright
upper limb and an overturned lower limb hosting the main mineral resources. Nearby drilling suggests a third limb, an upright
lower limb, likely occurs beneath the currently explored stratigraphy.
Lithologies and
Lithologic Domain Descriptions
Historically, five lithologic groupings
have been utilized by Kennecott to describe the local stratigraphy of the deposit. These groupings include: 1) metarhyolite (Button
Schist) or porphyroblastic quartz feldspar porphyry and rhyolitic volcaniclastic and tuffaceous rocks; 2) quartz mica schists
composed of tuffaceous and volcaniclastic sediments; 3) graphitic schists composed of carbonaceous sedimentary rocks; 4) base
metal sulphide bearing schists; and 5) talc schists composed of talc altered volcanic and sedimentary rocks.
The principal lithologic units captured
in logging and mapping by Trilogy are summarized and described in the following subsections, in broadly chronologically order
from oldest to youngest.
Greenstone (GNST)
Greenstones are typically massive dark-green
amphibole- and garnet-bearing rocks, differentiated by their low quartz content and dark green color. Textural and colour similarities
along with similar garnet components and textures often cause confusion with some sedimentary greywackes within the Ambler Sequence
stratigraphy. Intervals of greenstone range up to 80 m in thickness and are identified as pillowed flows, sills and dikes. Multiple
ages of deposition are implied as both basal pillowed units are present as well as intrusive sill and dike-like bodies higher
in the local stratigraphy.
Chlorite Schist (CHS)
This unit is likely alteration-related
but has been used for rocks where more than half of the sheet silicates are composed of chlorite. In the field, some samples of
chlorite schist showed a distinctive dark green to blue-green colour, but in drill core the chlorite schists commonly have lighter
green colour. Some intervals of chlorite schist are associated with talc-rich units.
Talc Schist (TS)
Talc-bearing schists are often in contact
with chlorite-rich units and reflect units which contain trace to as much as 10% talc often occurring on partings. Like the chlorite
schist this unit is likely alteration related.
Black to Grey Schist
(GS)
Black or grey schists appear in many stratigraphic
locations particularly higher in the stratigraphy but principally constitute the mineralized permissive stratigraphy of the Arctic
Deposit lying immediately below the Button Schist (MRP). The unit is typically composed of muscovite, quartz, feldspar, graphite,
and sometimes chlorite, biotite or sulphides. The texture is phyllitic, variably crenulated, well-foliated and suggests a pelitic
protolith, likely deposited in a basin progressively filled with terrigenous fine sediment. This unit is host to the MS and SMS
horizons that constitute the Arctic Deposit.
Button Schist (MRP)
This rock type consists of quartz-muscovite-feldspar
schists with abundant distinctive 1 to 3 cm albite porphyroblasts of metamorphic origin and occasional 0.5 to 2 cm blue quartz
phenocrysts of likely igneous origin. The unit shows a commonly massive to weakly foliated texture, although locally the rocks
have a well-developed foliation with elongate feldspars.
Quartz-Mica-(Feldspar)
Schist (QMS/QFMS)
This schistose rock contains variable proportions
of quartz, muscovite, and sometimes feldspar. Most contain high amounts of interstitial silica, and some have feldspar or quartz
porphyroblasts. The texture of the unit shows significant variability and likely represents both altered and texturally distinct
felsic tuffs and volcaniclastic lithologies.
Volcanic Debris Flow
(DM)
This unit contains a range of unsorted,
matrix supported polylithic clasts including Button Schist occurring in black to dark grey, very fine-grained graphitic schist.
The unit occurs as lenses with other stratigraphies and likely represents local derived debris flows or slumps.
Greywacke (GW)
This unit consists of massive green rocks
with quartz, chlorite, probably amphibole, feldspar, muscovite, and accessory garnet, biotite, and calcite/carbonate. Voluminous
accumulations of medium-grained greywacke occur within, but generally above, the quartz mica schist and are differentiated from
texturally similar greenstones by the presence of detrital quartz, fine-grained interbeds, graded bedding and flute casts.
Lithogeochemistry of
Immobile Trace Elements
In 2007, work by NovaGold suggested that
many of the nondescript felsic metavolcanic lithologies were simply alteration and textural variants of the felsic rock units
and not adequately capturing true compositional lithological differences between units. Twelker (2008) demonstrated that the use
of lithogeochemistry utilizing immobile trace elements specifically Al2O3:TiO2 (aluminium oxide:titanium dioxide) ratios could
be used to effectively differentiate between different felsic volcanic and sedimentary suites of rocks at the Arctic Deposit.
Lithogeochemistry shows three major felsic
rock suites in the Arctic Deposit area: a rhyolite suite; and intermediate volcanic suite and a volcaniclastic suite. These suites
are partially in agreement with the logged lithology but in some instances show that alteration in texture and composition masked
actual lithologic differences.
Results of the lithogeochemistry have led
to a better understanding of the stratigraphic continuity of the various units and have been utilized to more accurately model
the lithologic domains of the Arctic Deposit.
Lithologic Domains
Though a variety of detailed lithologies
are logged during data capture, Trilogy models the deposit area as two distinct units –an Upper Plate and Lower Plate separated
by the Warm Springs Fault. The Upper and Lower plates contain similar lithologic domains which are primarily defined by lithogeochemical
characteristics, but are also consistent with their respective acid-generating capacities and spatial distribution around the
fold axes, and include the following units: the Button Schist (a meta-rhyolite porphyry - MRP), aphanitic meta-rhyolite, a series
of felsic quartz mica schists, and carbonaceous schists of the Grey Schist unit. An alteration model has been built to adequately
characterize the chlorite and talc schists found within the deposit. The mineralization is modelled as eight distinct zones (Zones
1 – 8) found both in the Upper and Lower plates and range from MS to SMS layers.
Structure
Earlier studies concluded mineralization
at the Arctic deposit was part of a normal stratigraphic sequence striking northeast and dipping gently southwest. Subsequent
reinterpretation by Kennecott in 1998 and 1999 suggested the entire Ambler Sequence at Arctic could be overturned. Proffett (1999)
reviewed the Arctic geology and suggested that a folded model with mineralization as part of an isoclinal anticline opening east
and closing west could account for the mapped and logged geology. His interpretation called for an F2 fold superimposed on a north-trending
F1 fabric.
Lindberg (2004) supported a folded model
similar to Proffett, though he felt the main fold at Arctic is northwest closing and southeast opening. Lindberg named this feature
the Arctic Antiform, and interpreted this structure to be an F1 fold.
Lindberg believes the majority of folding
within the mineralized horizons occurs in the central part of the deposit within a southwest plunging “cascade zone.”
The increased thicknesses of mineralized intervals in this part of the property can in part be explained by the multiple folding
of two main mineralized horizons as opposed to numerous individual mineralized beds as shown in the 1995 geologic model. The cascade
zone appears to be confined to the upper sulphide limbs of the Arctic Antiform.
Continuity drilling on closer spacing in
2008 across the “cascade” zone confirms the continuity of the two mineralized horizons but does not support the complexity
proposed by Lindberg. Dodd et al. (2004) suggested that some of the complexity might be related to minor thrusting. Results of
2006 mapping at Arctic supported the interpretation that an F2 fold event may fold the lower Button Schist back to the north under
the deposit in this area (Otto 2006). Deep drilling in 2007 just to the north of the deposit to test the concept drilled the appropriate
upright stratigraphy at depth. Though the target horizon was not reached due to the drill rig limitations the hole did encountered
significant mineralization below the Button Schist immediately above the sulphide-bearing permissive stratigraphy. That hole (AR07-110)
intersected roughly 35 m of anomalous mineralization including 0.45 m of 1.17% copper, 0.8% lead, 5.8% zinc, 49.7 g/t silver and
0.7 g/t gold.
Alteration
Three main zones of hydrothermal alteration
occurring at the Arctic Deposit have been defined:
|
·
|
A
main chloritic zone occurring within the footwall of the deposit consisting of phengite
and magnesium-chlorite.
|
|
·
|
A
mixed alteration zone occurring below and lateral to sulphide mineralization consisting
of phengite and phlogopite along with talc, calcite, dolomite and quartz.
|
|
·
|
A
pyritic zone overlying the sulphide mineralization.
|
Field observations conducted by Trilogy
in 2004 and 2005 supported by logging and short wave infrared (“
SWIR
”) spectrometry only partially support
Schmidt’s observations.
Talc and magnesium chlorite are the dominant
alteration products associated with the sulphide-bearing horizons. Talc alteration grades downward and outward to mixed talc-magnesium
chlorite with minor phlogopite, into zones of dominantly magnesium chlorite, then into mixed magnesium chlorite-phengite with
outer phengite-albite zones of alteration. Thickness of alteration zones vary with stratigraphic interpretation, but tens of metres
for the outer zones is likely, as seen in phengite-albite exposures on the east side of Arctic Ridge.
Stratigraphically above the sulphide-bearing
horizons significant muscovite as paragonite is developed and results in a marked shift in sodium/magnesium (Na/Mg) ratios across
the sulphide bearing horizons.
Visual and quantitative determination of
many of the alteration products is difficult at best due to their light colours and the well-developed micaceous habit of many
of the alteration species. Logging in general has poorly captured the alteration products and the SWIR methodology though far
more effective in capturing the presence or absence of various alteration minerals adds little in any quantitative assessment.
Of particular note are the barium species
including barite, cymrite (a high-pressure Ba phyllosilicate), and Ba-bearing muscovite, phlogopite and biotite. These mineral
species are associated with both alteration and mineralization and demonstrate local remobilization during metamorphism. Though
little has been done to document their distribution, they do have a significant impact on bulk density measurements.
Additional discussion of the potential
impacts of barite is discussed under the headings “
The Arctic Project – Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification
”
and “
The Arctic Project – Mineral Resource Estimate
”).
Talc is of particular importance at the
Arctic Deposit due to its potential negative impact on flotation characteristics during metallurgical processing as well as for
geotechnical pit slope stability. A great deal of effort has gone into modeling the distribution of talc and talc-chlorite units
throughout the deposit area; even zones as small as 10cm have been logged and mapped. The majority of the talc zones occur between
the upper, stratigraphically up-right zones and the lower, overturned zones. Significant metallurgical test work has demonstrated
that a talc pre-float eliminates talc from interfering with subsequent extraction and concentration of the base and precious metals
(See under the heading “
The Arctic Project – Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
”). As for the
geotechnical stabilities, SRK has completed detailed studies and these will be included in future pit slope stability studies.
Arctic Deposit
Mineralization
Mineralization occurs as stratiform SMS
to MS beds within primarily graphitic schists and fine-grained quartz mica schists. The sulphide beds average 4 m in thickness
but vary from less than 1 m up to as much as 32 m in thickness. The sulfide mineralization occurs within eight modelled zones
lying along the upper and lower limbs of the Arctic isoclinal anticline. All of the zones are within an area of roughly 1 km
2
with mineralization extending to a depth of approximately 250 m below the surface. There are five zones of MS and SMS that
occur at specific pseudo-stratigraphic levels which make up the bulk of the mineral resources. The other three zones also occur
at specific pseudo-stratigraphic levels, but are too discontinuous to confidently model as resources.
Unlike more typical VMS deposits, mineralization
is not characterized by steep metal zonation or massive pyritic zones. Mineralization is dominantly sheet-like zones of base metal
sulphides with variable pyrite and only minor zonation usually on an extremely small scale.
Mineralization is predominately coarse-grained
sulphides consisting mainly of chalcopyrite, sphalerite, galena, tetrahedrite-tennantite, pyrite, arsenopyrite, and pyrrhotite.
Trace amounts of electrum are also present. Gangue minerals associated with the mineralized horizons include quartz, barite, white
mica, chlorite, stilpnomelane, talc, calcite, dolomite and cymrite.
Genesis
Historic interpretation of the genesis
of the Ambler Schist belt deposits have called for a syngenetic VMS origin with steep thermal gradients in and around seafloor
hydrothermal vents resulting in metal deposition due to the rapid cooling of chloride-complexed base metals. A variety of VMS
types have been well documented in the literature with the Ambler Schist belt deposits most similar to deposits associated with
bimodal felsic dominant volcanism related to incipient rifting.
The majority of field observations broadly
support such a scenario at the Arctic Deposit and include: 1) the tectonic setting with Devonian volcanism in an evolving continental
rift; 2) the geologic setting with bimodal volcanics including pillow basalts and felsic volcanic tuffs; 3) an alteration assemblage
with well-defined magnesium-rich footwall alteration and sodium-rich hanging wall alteration; and 4) typical polymetallic base-metal
mineralization with massive and semi-massive sulphides.
Deposits
and Prospects
In addition to the Arctic Deposit, numerous
other VMS-like occurrences are present on the Trilogy land package. The most notable of these occurrences are the Dead Creek (also
known as Shungnak), Sunshine, Cliff, Horse, Cobre and the Snow prospects to the west of the Arctic Deposit and the Red, Nora,
Tom-Tom and BT prospects to the east.
Deposit Types
The mineralization at the Arctic Deposit
and at several other known occurrences within the Ambler Sequence stratigraphy of the Ambler District, consists of Devonian age,
polymetallic (zinc-copper-lead-silver-gold) VMS-like occurrences. VMS deposits are formed by and associated with sub-marine volcanic-related
hydrothermal events. These events are related to spreading centres such as fore arc, back arc or mid-ocean ridges. VMS deposits
are often stratiform accumulations of sulphide minerals that precipitate from hydrothermal fluids on or below the seafloor. These
deposits are found in association with volcanic, volcaniclastic and/or siliciclastic rocks. They are classified by their depositional
environment and associated proportions of mafic and/or felsic igneous rocks to sedimentary rocks. There are five general classifications
based on rock type and depositional environment:
|
·
|
Mafic
rock dominated often with ophiolite sequences, often called Cyprus type.
|
|
·
|
Bimodal-mafic
type with up to 25% felsic volcanic rocks.
|
|
·
|
Mafic-siliciclastic
type with approximately equal parts mafic and siliciclastic rocks, which can have minor
felsic rocks and are often called Besshi type.
|
|
·
|
Felsic-siliciclastic
type with abundant felsic rocks, less than 10% mafic rocks and shale rich.
|
|
·
|
Bimodal-felsic
type where felsic rocks are more abundant than mafic rocks with minor sedimentary rocks,
also referred to as Kuroko type.
|
Prior to any subsequent deformation and/or
metamorphism, these deposits are often bowl- or mound-shaped with stockworks and stringers of sulfide minerals found near vent
zones. These types of deposit exhibit an idealized zoning pattern as follows:
|
·
|
Pyrite
and chalcopyrite near vents.
|
|
·
|
A
halo around the vents consisting of chalcopyrite, sphalerite and pyrite.
|
|
·
|
A
more distal zone of sphalerite and galena and metals such as manganese.
|
|
·
|
Increasing
manganese with oxides such as hematite and chert more distal to the vent.
|
Alteration halos associated with VMS deposits
often contain sericite, ankerite, chlorite, hematite and magnetite close to the VMS with weak sericite, carbonate, zeolite, prehnite
and chert more distal. These alteration assemblages and relationships are dependent on degree of post deposition deformation and
metamorphism. A modern analog of this type of deposit is found around fumaroles or black smokers in association with rift zones.
In the Ambler District, VMS-like mineralization
occurs in the Ambler Sequence schists over a strike length of approximately 110 km. These deposits are hosted in volcaniclastic,
siliciclastic and calcareous metasedimentary rocks interlayered with mafic and felsic metavolcanic rocks. Sulphide mineralization
occurs above the mafic metavolcanic rocks but below the Button schist, a distinctive district wide felsic unit characterized by
large K-feldspar porphyroblasts after relic phenocrysts. The presence of the mafic and felsic metavolcanic units is used as evidence
to suggest formation in a rift-related environment, possibly proximal to a continental margin.
A sulphide-smoker occurrence has been tentatively
identified near Dead Creek, northwest of the Arctic Deposit and suggests local hydrothermal venting during deposition. However,
the lack of stockworks and stringer-type mineralization at the Arctic Deposit suggest that the deposit may not be a proximal vent
type VMS. Although the deposit is stratiform in nature, it exhibits characteristics and textures common to replacement-style mineralization.
At least some of the mineralization may have formed as a diagenetic replacement.
At the Arctic Deposit, sulphides occur
as disseminated (<30%), semi-massive (30 to 50% sulphide) to massive (greater than 50% sulphide) layers, typically dominated
by pyrite with substantial disseminated sphalerite and chalcopyrite and trace amounts of galena and tetrahedrite-tennantite. The
Arctic Deposit sulphide accumulation is thought to be stratigraphically correlative to those seen at the Dead Creek and Sunshine
deposits up to 12 km to the west.
There is also an occurrence of epithermal
discordant vein and fracture hosted base metal (lead-zinc-copper) mineralization with significant fluorite mineralization identified
at the Red prospect in the Kogoluktuk Valley, east of the Arctic Deposit. Although not yet fully understood, the genesis of this
occurrence is considered to be related to the regional system that formed the VMS deposits in the Ambler District.
Exploration
The following section summarizes and highlights
work completed by Trilogy and its predecessor company NovaGold. NovaGold began exploration of the Arctic Deposit and surrounding
lands of the Schist belt in 2004 after optioning the Arctic Property from Kennecott. Previous exploration on the Arctic Property
during Kennecott’s tenure is summarized under the heading “
The Arctic Project – History
”.
Field exploration was largely conducted
during the period between 2004 to 2007 with associated engineering and characterization studies between 2008 and the present.
Drilling related to exploration is discussed under the heading “
The Arctic Project – Drilling
”.
Table 7: Summary of Trilogy/NovaGold Exploration
Activities Targeting VMS-style Mineralization in the Ambler Sequence Stratigraphy and the Arctic Deposit
Work
Completed
|
|
Year
|
|
Details
|
|
Focus
|
Geological Mapping
|
-
|
|
2004
|
|
-
|
|
Arctic Deposit surface geology
|
-
|
|
2005
|
|
-
|
|
Ambler Sequence west of the Arctic Deposit
|
-
|
|
2006
|
|
-
|
|
COU, Dead Creek, Sunshine, Red
|
-
|
|
2015, 2016
|
|
SRK
|
|
Geotechnical Structural Mapping
|
-
|
|
2016
|
|
-
|
|
Arctic Deposit surface geology
|
Geophysical Surveys
|
SWIR Spectrometry
|
|
2004
|
|
2004 drill holes
|
|
Alteration characterization
|
TDEM
|
|
2005
|
|
2 loops
|
|
Follow-up of Kennecott DIGHEM EM survey
|
|
|
2006
|
|
13 loops
|
|
District targets
|
|
|
2007
|
|
6 loops
|
|
Arctic extensions
|
Downhole EM
|
|
2007
|
|
4 drill holes
|
|
Arctic Deposit
|
Geochemistry
|
-
|
|
2005
|
|
-
|
|
Stream silts – core area prospects
|
-
|
|
2006
|
|
-
|
|
Soils – core area prospects
|
-
|
|
2006
|
|
-
|
|
Stream silts – core area prospects
|
-
|
|
2007
|
|
-
|
|
Soils – Arctic Deposit area
|
Survey
|
Collar
|
|
2004 to 2011
|
|
GPS
|
|
All 2004 to 2011 NovaCopper drill holes
|
|
|
2004, 2008
|
|
Resurveys
|
|
Historical Kennecott drill holes
|
Photography/Topography
|
|
2010
|
|
-
|
|
Photography/topography
|
LiDAR Survey
|
|
2015, 2016
|
|
-
|
|
LiDAR over Arctic Deposit
|
Technical Studies
|
Geotechnical
|
|
2010
|
|
BGC
|
|
Preliminary geotechnical and hazards
|
ML/ARD
|
|
2011
|
|
SRK
|
|
Preliminary ML and ARD
|
Metallurgy
|
|
2012
|
|
SGS
|
|
Preliminary mineralogy and metallurgy
|
Geotechnical and Hydrology
|
|
2012
|
|
BGC
|
|
Preliminary rock mechanics and hydrology
|
Geotechnical and Hydrology
|
|
2015, 2016
|
|
SRK
|
|
Arctic PFS Slope Design
|
ML/ARD
|
|
2015, 2016, 2017
|
|
SRK
|
|
Static Kinetic Tests and ABA Update - ongoing
|
Metallurgy
|
|
2015, 2016, 2017
|
|
SGS, ALS
|
|
Cu-Pb Separation Test Work; Flotation and Variability Test
Work
|
Project Evaluation
|
Resource Estimation
|
|
2008
|
|
SRK
|
|
Resource estimation
|
PEA
|
|
2011
|
|
SRK
|
|
PEA – Underground
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Tetra Tech
|
|
PEA – Open Pit
|
|
Note:
|
SWIR = short wave infrared; ML
= metal leaching; BGC = BGC Engineering Inc.; SRK = SRK Consulting; SGS = SGS Canada;
ALS = ALS Metallurgy
|
Drilling
Drilling at the Arctic Deposit and within
the Ambler District has been ongoing since its initial discovery in 1967. Approximately 56,480 m of drilling has been completed
within the Ambler District, including 39,320m of drilling in 163 drill holes at the Arctic deposit or on potential extensions
in 27 campaigns spanning 50 years. All of the drill campaigns at Arctic have been run under the auspices of either: 1) Kennecott
and its subsidiaries (BCMC), 2) Anaconda, or 3) Trilogy and its predecessor companies, NovaGold and NovaCopper.
Trilogy and its predecessor company NovaGold
drilled 22,144 m in 79 different drill holes targeting the Arctic Deposit and several other prospects of the Ambler Schist belt.
Table 8 summarizes all of the Trilogy/NovaGold tenure drilling on the Arctic Property.
Table 8: Summary of Trilogy/NovaGold Drilling
Year
|
|
Metres
|
|
|
No. of
Drill Holes
|
|
Sequence
|
|
Purpose of Drilling
|
2004
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
|
11
|
|
AR04-78 to 88
|
|
Deposit scoping and verification
|
2005
|
|
|
3,030
|
|
|
9
|
|
AR05-89 to 97
|
|
Extensions to the Arctic Deposit
|
2006
***
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
|
12
|
|
AR06-98 to 109
|
|
Property-wide exploration drilling
|
2007
|
|
|
2,606
|
|
|
4
|
|
AR07-110 to 113
|
|
Deep extensions of the Arctic Deposit
|
2008
*
|
|
|
3,306
|
|
|
14
|
|
AR08-114 to 126
|
|
Grade continuity and metallurgy
|
2011
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
5
|
|
AR11-127 to 131
|
|
Geotechnical studies
|
2012
***
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
|
4
|
|
SC12-014 to 017
|
|
Exploration drilling – Sunshine
|
2015
|
|
|
3,055
|
|
|
14
|
|
AR15-132 to 145
|
|
Geotechnical-hydrogeological studies, resource infill
|
2016
|
|
|
3,058
|
|
|
13
|
|
AR16-146 to 158
|
|
Geotechnical-hydrogeological studies, resource infill
|
2017
**
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
5
|
|
AR17-159 to 163
|
|
Ore sorting studies
|
|
Notes:
|
*A total of 12 of the 14 holes
drilled in 2008 were utilized in the 2012 SRK resource update. Two holes were maintained
in sealed frozen storage to provide additional metallurgical samples if required.
|
**Holes drilled
in 2017 are not included in the current resource estimation contained herein.
***Drilling in 2006 and 2012
targeted exploration targets elsewhere in the VMS belt.
A detailed discussion and review of the
geotechnical and hydrogeological results can be found under the heading “
The Arctic Project – Exploration
”.
Recovery
Core recovery during NovaGold/Trilogy tenure
has been good to excellent, resulting in quality samples with little to no bias. There are no other known drilling and/or recovery
factors that could materially impact accuracy of the samples during this period. Table 9 shows recoveries and rock-quality designation
(“
RQD
”) for each of the NovaGold/Trilogy campaigns exclusive of the geotechnical drill holes in 2011. BGC Engineering
Inc. (2012) reports a detailed and exhaustive discussion of the recoveries and RQDs of the 2011 drilling.
Table 9: Recovery and RQD 2004 to 2008
Arctic Drill Campaigns
Year
|
|
Metres
|
|
|
Recovery
(%)
|
|
|
RQD
(%)
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
|
|
98.0
|
|
|
|
73.4
|
|
2005
|
|
|
3,030
|
|
|
|
96.0
|
|
|
|
74.4
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2,606
|
|
|
|
95.7
|
|
|
|
73.1
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,306
|
|
|
|
98.0
|
|
|
|
80.1
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
96.0
|
|
|
|
68.8
|
|
2015
|
|
|
3,055
|
|
|
|
91.3
|
|
|
|
69.0
|
|
Year
|
|
Metres
|
|
|
Recovery
(%)
|
|
|
RQD
(%)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
3,058
|
|
|
|
91.5
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
|
2017
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
95.5
|
|
|
|
75.0
|
|
Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification
Sample Preparation
Core Drilling
Sampling
The data for the Arctic Deposit resource
was generated over three primary drilling campaigns: 1966 to 1986 when BCMC, a subsidiary of Kennecott Copper Corporation was
the primary operator, 1998 when Kennecott Minerals resumed work after a long hiatus, and 2004 to present with NovaGold Resources
Inc. and now Trilogy as the operators.
Kennecott and BCMC
Sampling of drill core prior to 1998 by
BCMC focused primarily on the mineralized zones; numerous intervals of weak to moderate mineralization were not sampled during
this period. During the 1998 campaign, Kennecott did sample some broad zones of alteration and weak mineralization, but much of
the unaltered and unmineralized drill core was left unsampled. Little documentation on historic sampling procedures is available.
NovaGold and Trilogy
Tenure
Between 2004 and 2006, NovaGold conducted
a systematic drill core re-logging and re-sampling campaign of Kennecott and BCMC era drill holes AR-09 to AR-74. NovaGold either
took 1 to 2 m samples every 10 m, or sampled entire lengths of previously unsampled core within a minimum of 1 m and a maximum
of 3 m intervals. The objective of the sampling was to generate a full ICP geochemistry dataset for the Arctic Deposit and ensure
continuous sampling throughout the deposit. Sample preparation procedures for NovaGold era work are described in the following
subsection. Quality assurance/quality control (“
QA/QC
”) review of historic sampling is described under the
heading “
The Arctic Project – Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification – Quality Assurance/Quality Control
”
below.
All drill core was transported by helicopter
in secure core “baskets” to either the Dahl Creek camp or the Bornite camp for logging and sampling. Sample intervals
were determined by the geologist during the geological logging process. Sample intervals were labelled with white paper tags and
butter (aluminum) tags which were stapled to the core box. Each tag had a unique number which corresponded to that sample interval.
Sample intervals were determined by the
geological relationships observed in the core and limited to a 3 m maximum length and 1 m minimum length. An attempt was made
to terminate sample intervals at lithological and mineralization boundaries. Sampling was generally continuous from the top to
the bottom of the drill hole. When the hole was in unmineralized rock, the sample length was generally 3 m, whereas in mineralized
units, the sample length was shortened to 1 to 2 m.
Geological and geotechnical parameters
were recorded based on defined sample intervals and/or drill run intervals (defined by the placement of a wooden block at the
end of a core run). Logged parameters were reviewed annually and slight modifications have been made between campaigns, but generally
include rock type, mineral abundance, major structures, SG, point load testing, recovery and rock quality designation measurements.
Drill logs were converted to a digital format and forwarded to the Database Manager, who imported them into the master database.
Core was photographed and then brought
into the saw shack where it was split in half by the rock saw, divided into sample intervals, and bagged by the core cutters.
Not all core was oriented; however, core that had been oriented was identified to samplers by a line drawn down the core stick.
If core was not competent, it was split by using a spoon to transfer half of the core into the sample bag.
Once the core was sawed, half was sent
to ALS Minerals Laboratories (“
ALS Minerals
”) in Vancouver for analysis and the other half was initially stored
at the Dahl Creek camp but has been consolidated at the storage facility at the Bornite camp facilities or at Trilogy warehouse
in Fairbanks.
Shipment of core samples from the Dahl
Creek camp occurred on a drill hole by drill hole basis. Rice bags, containing two to four poly-bagged core samples each, were
marked and labelled with the ALS Minerals address, project and hole number, bag number, and sample numbers enclosed. Rice bags
were secured with a pre-numbered plastic security tie and a twist wire tie and then assembled into standard fish totes for transport
by chartered flights on a commercial airline to Fairbanks, where they were met by a contracted expeditor for deliver directly
to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Fairbanks. In addition to the core, control samples were inserted into the shipments
at the approximate rate of one standard, one blank and one duplicate per 20 core samples:
|
·
|
Standards:
four standards were used at the Arctic Deposit. The core cutter inserted a sachet of
the appropriate standard, as well as the sample tag, into the sample bag.
|
|
·
|
Blanks:
were composed of an unmineralized landscape aggregate. The core cutter inserted about
150 g of blank, as well as the sample tag, into the sample bag.
|
|
·
|
Duplicates:
the assay laboratory split the sample and ran both splits. The core cutter inserted a
sample tag into an empty sample bag.
|
Samples were logged into a tracking system
on arrival at ALS Minerals, and weighed. Samples were then crushed, dried, and a 250 g split pulverized to greater than 85% passing
75 μm.
Gold assays were determined using fire
analysis followed by an atomic absorption spectroscopy finish. The lower detection limit was 0.005 ppm gold; the upper limit was
1,000 ppm gold. An additional 49-element suite was assayed by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy methodology, following
nitric acid aqua regia digestion. The copper, zinc, lead, and silver analyses were completed by atomic absorption (“
AA
”),
following a triple acid digest, when overlimits.
Security
Security measures taken during historical
Kennecott and BCMC programs are unknown to NovaGold or Trilogy. Trilogy is not aware of any reason to suspect that any of these
samples have been tampered with. The 2004 to 2016 samples were either in the custody of NovaGold personnel or the assay laboratories
at all times, and the chain of custody of the samples is well documented.
Assaying
and Analytical Procedures
The laboratories used during the various
exploration, infill, and step-out drill analytical programs completed on the Arctic Project are summarized in Table 10.
ALS Minerals has attained International
Organization for Standardization (“
ISO
”) 9001:2000 registration. In addition, the ALS Minerals laboratory in
Vancouver is accredited to ISO 17025 by Standards Council of Canada for a number of specific test procedures including fire assay
of gold by AA, ICP and gravimetric finish, multi-element ICP and AA assays for silver, copper, lead and zinc.
Table 10: Analytical Laboratories Used
by Operators of the Arctic Project
Laboratory
Name
|
|
Laboratory
Location
|
|
Years
Used
|
|
Accreditation
|
|
Comment
|
Union Assay
Office, Inc.
|
|
Salt Lake City, Utah
|
|
1968
|
|
Accreditations are not known.
|
|
Primary Assay Lab
|
Rocky Mountain
Geochemical Corp.
|
|
South Midvale, Utah
|
|
1973
|
|
Accreditations are not known.
|
|
Primary and Secondary Assays
|
Resource Associates
of Alaska, Inc.
|
|
College, Alaska
|
|
1973, 1974
|
|
Accreditations are not known.
|
|
Primary and Secondary Assays
|
Georesearch
Laboratories, Inc.
|
|
Salt Lake City, Utah
|
|
1975, 1976
|
|
Accreditations are not known.
|
|
Primary and Secondary Assays
|
Bondar-Clegg &
Company Ltd.
|
|
North Vancouver BC
|
|
1981, 1982
|
|
Accreditations are not known.
|
|
Primary and Secondary Assays
|
Acme Analytical
Laboratories Ltd.
(AcmeLabs)
|
|
Vancouver, BC
|
|
1998, 2012,
2013
|
|
Accreditations are not known.
|
|
2012 and 2013 Secondary Check Sample Lab
|
Laboratory
Name
|
|
Laboratory
Location
|
|
Years
Used
|
|
Accreditation
|
|
Comment
|
ALS Analytical Lab
|
|
Fairbanks, Alaska
(prep) and
Vancouver, BC
(analytical)
|
|
1998, 2004,
2005, 2006,
2012, 2013,
2015, 2016
|
|
In 2004, ALS Minerals held ISO 9002 accreditations but changed
to ISO 9001 accreditations in late 2004. ISO/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 17025 accreditation
was obtained in 2005.
|
|
2012 - 2016 Primary
Assay Lab
|
Quality Assurance/Quality
Control
Core Drilling
Sampling QA/QC
Previous data verification campaigns were
limited in scope and documentation and are described by SRK (2012).
During 2013, Trilogy conducted a 26% audit
of the NovaGold era assay database fields: sample interval, Au, Ag, Cu, Zn, and Pb. This audit is documented in a series of memos.
Trilogy staff did not identify and/or correct any transcription and/or coding errors in the database prior to resource estimation.
Trilogy also retained independent consultant Caroline Vallat, P.Geo. of GeoSpark Consulting Inc. (“
GeoSpark
”)
to: 1) re-load 100% of the historical assay certificates, 2) conduct a QA/QC review of paired historical assays and NovaGold era
re-assays; 3) monitor an independent check assay program for the 2004 to 2008 and 2011 drill campaigns; and 4) generate QA/QC
reports for the NovaGold era 2004 to 2008 and NovaCopper/Trilogy era 2011, 2015, and 2016 drill campaigns. Below is a summary
of the results and conclusions of the GeoSpark QA/QC review.
Novagold QA/QC Review
on Historical Analytical Results
During 2004, NovaGold conducted a large
rerun program and check sampling campaign on pre-NovaGold (pre-2004) drill core. The 2004 and 2005 ALS Minerals Laboratories primary
sample results have been assigned as the primary assay results for the Arctic Project in the database, amounting to 1,287 of the
total 3,186 primary samples related to pre-NovaGold drill holes.
During 2013, GeoSpark conducted a QA/QC
review of available QA/QC data (20130422 – QAQC on Pre-NovaGold Arctic Assays); including sample pair data amounting to
422 data pairs which is 11% relative to the primary sample quantity. The sample pairs included original duplicates, original repeat
assays, 2004 rerun assays on original sample pulps analyzed secondarily at ALS Minerals, and check samples from 2004 on original
samples re-analyzed at ALS Minerals.
The review found that the available QA/QC
data is related to drill holes that are spatially well distributed over the historic drill hole locations.
Review of Precision
A comparison of the original analytical
results with the secondary results serves to infer the level of precision within the original results. Also, the 2004 rerun sample
results and the check sample pair results from 2004 and 2005 were compared to the original assays to infer the level of repeatability
or precision within the original results.
The result of the average relative difference
(“
AD
”) review on sample pairs found satisfactory to good inferred precision levels for all of the sample pairs
and elements except for the 2004 rerun sample lead results. For the lead 2004 rerun sample pairs there were 66.85% of the pairs
less than the 1 AD limit, inferring poor precision in the original results. Overall, the lead values were found to pass the AD
criteria for the original duplicates, original repeats, and check sample reviews. More insight was made regarding the lead precision
upon review of the data pairs graphically within scatter plots and Thompson-Howarth Precision Versus Concentration plots. The
2004 rerun sample lead values were found to infer a poor-to-moderate level of precision and an indication that the original results
might be of negative bias where the original results may have been reported on average 0.2% less than their true values for grades
of 0.5% lead and higher. However, the original duplicate, original repeats, and check samples inferred that there was a moderate
or satisfactory level of correlation within the lead values. Furthermore, the overall inference of precision in the lead values
has been defined as moderate.
The detailed review of the gold pairs inferred
an overall moderate level of precision within the original analytical results.
The silver, copper, and zinc analytical
pair review found overall inferred strong precision in the original analytical results.
It is GeoSpark's opinion that the detailed
review of analytical pair values reported for gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc has inferred an overall acceptable level of
precision within the original sample analytical results for the pre-NovaGold Arctic Project.
Review of Accuracy
The rerun sample program of 2004 included
analysis of 53 QA/QC materials comprising 20 standards and 33 blanks. These standards and blanks were reviewed in order to indirectly
infer the accuracy within the original sample data.
The 2004 rerun samples on original pulps
also included analysis of standards and blanks with the primary samples. These results have been reviewed using control charts
for review of the inferred accuracy within the 2004 rerun sample results; in addition, the inferred rerun sample accuracy is related
to the accuracy of the original results in that comparison of the original results to the 2004 reruns and has been shown to be
acceptable overall.
The blank results were reviewed for gold,
silver, copper, lead, and zinc and it has been inferred that there is good accuracy within the results and that there was no significant
issue with sample contamination or instrument calibration during the analysis.
The standard results were reviewed for
gold, silver, copper, lead, and zinc. The reported control limits were available for silver, copper, lead, and zinc. The gold
control limits were calculated for the review.
In addition upon initial review, the zinc
control limits were also calculated from the available data to provide a more realistic range of control values for the results.
The gold, silver, and copper results were inferred to be of strong accuracy. The lead and zinc results were inferred to be of
moderate accuracy overall.
It was GeoSpark’s opinion that the
review for accuracy has found an acceptable level of inferred accuracy within the gold, silver, copper, lead, and zinc results
reported for the 2004 rerun samples and indirectly within the original results.
Review of Bias
There were 35 check samples on original
samples re-assayed at ALS Minerals during 2004. These were reviewed for an indication of bias in the original results. Additionally,
the 2004 rerun sample results have been reviewed for inference of bias in the original results.
Overall, the detailed review of the check
sample pair gold concentrations has found minor positive bias in the 2004 pairs and minor positive bias in the 2005 pairs. The
level of bias is inferred to be at very near zero with the original being reported approximately 0.005 greater than the 2004 results
reported by ALS Minerals. The 2004 rerun samples compared to the originals has inferred negligible bias in the original gold results.
It is GeoSpark's opinion that these levels of inferred bias are not significant to merit concern with the overall quality of gold
values reported for the pre-NovaGold Arctic Project.
The detailed review of the check sample
silver pairs has found minor negative bias implied by the 2004 check sample pairs. The 2004 rerun samples have shown a negligible
amount of bias in the original results. It is GeoSpark’s opinion that overall the bias in original silver concentrations
is inferred to be negligible to minor negative but not significant to merit concern of the overall quality of the silver results.
The copper check samples reported in 2004
were found to have a few anomalous results that were implying significant positive bias. However, a more detailed review found
that the exclusion of the anomalous pairs resulted in a minor positive bias overall. The 2004 rerun sample copper results have
shown that there is a possibility for positive bias in the original copper grades at concentrations greater than 5%. Overall,
it is GeoSpark’s opinion that the bias inferred within the original copper results is not significant to merit concern with
the original assay quality.
The 2004 check sample review inferred overall
small negative bias in the original lead results. The 2004 rerun sample data also inferred that there was a small negative bias
in the original results for grades over 0.5%. Overall, it is GeoSpark’s opinion that this detailed review has inferred that
the levels of inferred bias within the lead concentrations are not significant enough to merit concern over the original result
quality.
The original zinc results have been inferred
to be of very minor positive bias when the 2004 check sample pairs (excluding three anomalous pairs) are reviewed. The 2004 rerun
sample zinc values have been shown to be very comparable with the originals and a negligible amount of bias can be inferred in
the original zinc concentrations. Furthermore, this detailed bias review has inferred that there is no significant bias in the
original zinc results for the pre-NovaGold Arctic Project.
Conclusion
The pre-NovaGold Arctic Project database
analytical results have been verified and updated to provide a good level of confidence in the database records.
It is GeoSpark’s opinion that with
consideration of the historic nature of the Arctic Project, a sufficient amount of QA/QC data and information has been reviewed
to make a statement of the overall pre-NovaGold Arctic Project analytical result quality.
It is GeoSpark’s opinion that this
detailed review has inferred that the pre-NovaGold Arctic Project analytical results are of overall acceptable quality.
QA/QC Review on Novagold
(2004 to 2013) Analytical Results
During 2013, GeoSpark conducted a series
of QA/QC reviews on Trilogy 2004 to 2013 analytical results. These QA/QC reviews serve to infer the precision of the Trilogy Arctic
Project analytical results through a detailed analytical and statistical review of field duplicate samples; serve to infer the
accuracy of the analytical results through a review of the standards and blanks inserted throughout the Trilogy programs; and
serve to define any bias in the primary sample results through a review of secondary lab checks at AcmeLabs in Vancouver, BC.
Acid-Base Accounting
Sampling QA/QC
SRK conducted a QA/QC review of the 2010
ABA dataset for the Arctic Project in March 2011. The memo entitled “Preliminary ML/ARD Analysis Ambler District Arctic
Deposit, Alaska”, located in NovaCopper’s Document Management System (“
DMS
”), discusses the results
of the ABA review and documents the 33 duplicate ABA analyses on the lab certificates.
Density Determinations
QA/QC
A QA/QC review of the SG dataset for the
Arctic Project was conducted by NovaCopper staff in March 2013. The memo entitled “Arctic_Specific Gravity Review_A.West_20130326”,
located in NovaCopper’s DMS, discusses the results of the QA/QC review and is summarized in the following subsections.
Lab Versus Field Determinations
SG lab determinations conducted during
2004 produced significantly lower average SG results for the mineralized zone than the 1998 and 2004 average field determinations.
In the same test, lithology samples outside the mineralized zone produced comparable values. The difference between the averaged
1998 and 2004 lab results and those from field studies may be the result of selection bias, limited population size, and sample
length. Paired lab and field determinations from the 2004 program show very low variation.
In 2010, to check the validity of the wet-dry
measurements on the Arctic Deposit core with respect to possible permeability of the core samples, NovaGold measured 50 unwaxed
samples representing a full range of SG values for a variety of lithologies and then submitted the samples to ALS Minerals for
wet-dry SG determinations after being sealed in wax. The mean difference between the NovaGold unwaxed and the ALS Minerals waxed
SG determinations was 0.01.
In 2011, to check the accuracy of the wet-dry
measurements, the SG for 266 pulps was determined by pycnometer by ALS Minerals (ALS code OA-GRA08b). The two methods compare
favourably, with the wet-dry measurements displaying a very slight low bias. Generally, wet-dry measurements are considered the
more acceptable method for accurate SG determinations since they are performed on whole (or split) core that more closely resembles
the in-situ rock mass.
Stoichiometric Method
Full sample length determinations can be
directly compared to the assay results for copper, zinc, lead, iron, and barium that are the major constituents of the sulphide
and sulphate species for the Arctic Deposit. This allows NovaCopper to check the wet-dry measurements by estimating the SG for
an ideal stoichiometric distribution of the elements into sulphide and sulphate species.
Stoichiometric SG values were estimated
for 279 sample intervals from 2008 drill core that had both measured SG values and total digestion XRF barium values. Overall,
there is a very good correlation between the two SG populations (R2 of 0.9671), though stoichiometric estimates are slightly lower
with increasing SG. Using slightly different compositional values for the assorted sulphide and sulphate species, and assuming
a 1:1 ratio of weight percent iron to weight percent copper in chalcopyrite (the molar value is 1:1), the stoichiometric equation
yields SGs that have an even better correlation (R2=0.9726), due to partitioning more iron into less dense chalcopyrite which
leaves less iron available for more dense pyrite, essentially correcting the bias for the lack of estimated iron-bearing silicates.
Multiple Regressions
Method
The positive comparisons/correlations of
our measured SG values to the laboratory determined values and to the stoichiometric estimated values gives us high confidence
in our wet-dry measurements. As a result, a multiple regression analysis can be performed using the assay data to get a best fit
to the measured SGs. This may correct for the varying residencies of Fe and Ba (and also for the varying density within sphalerite
due to the Zn:Fe ratio).
The best fit to the data was achieved by
using the multiple regression tool in Microsoft Excel on Ba, Fe, Zn and Cu for the entire dataset. The estimate correlates very
well (R2=0.9678) with observed data and has a sinusoidal pattern that fits the low and moderately high SG very well and has high
bias for moderate SG values and a low bias for very high SG values. The resultant SG formula is as follows:
SG (Regression) = 2.567 + 0.0048*Cu(wt%)
+ 0.045*Fe(wt%) + 0.032*Ba(wt%) + 0.023%*Zn(wt%)
Density Determinations
Performance
The SG of a field sample interval can be
reproduced in the lab or estimated from assay values using either a stoichiometric method which assumes a fixed metal residency
in certain sulphide and sulphates or by a multiple regression method that empirically fits measured data. Overall, what this QA/QC
analysis suggests is that the measured SG values can be replicated by various methods, thus supporting the quality of the measured
SG data.
Arctic Project
Technical Report Author’s Opinion
In the Arctic Project Technical Report,
BD Resource Consulting, Inc. (“
BDRC
”) stated that it believes the database meets or exceeds industry standards
of data quality and integrity. BDRC further stated that it believes the sample preparation, security and analytical procedures
are adequate to support resource estimation.
Data Verification
Drill Hole
Nine drill hole collars (AR-03, AR-04,
AR-10, AR-44, AR-47, AR-64, AR05-0094, AR05-0097 and AR-40) were located by Tetra Tech using a Garmin Etrex 20 GPS unit. The offset
distances between the collar coordinates reflected in the drill hole database provided by Trilogy and the measured positions range
from 3.4 to 7.8 m with an average offset of 4.8 m. This range is within the tolerance to be expected from GPS measurements and
the collar positions are adequately located to form the basis of resource estimation work.
BDRC checked the locations of holes drilled
to infill the PEA drill pattern. Infill holes were correctly located relative to the prior drilling. All holes were compared to
the LIDAR survey of the topographic surface and found to be in the correct locations. All holes are adequately located to support
resource estimation.
Topography Verification
Tetra Tech conducted two foot traverses
over representative areas of the Arctic Deposit. Continuous GPS measurements were compiled during these traverses. The averages
of these 724 spot height measurements within 10 m2 by 10 m2 areas were compared to the corresponding digital terrain model survey
points.
For the traverse data, 90% confidence limits
are -0.73 m and +0.09 m.
Agreement between surveyed drill hole collar
elevations and the LIDAR topographic surface verifies the correctness of the digital topography.
Core Logging Verification
Tetra Tech visited the Trilogy core storage
facility in Fairbanks in 2013 and reviewed three drill holes for lithology, mineralization and the quality of storage.
Core boxes were found to be in good condition
and intervals were easily retrieved for the following drill holes:
|
·
|
AR05-0092
(129 to 147 m)
|
|
·
|
AR08-0117
(128 to 216 m)
|
|
·
|
AR08-0126
(144 to 211 m).
|
Logged descriptions of massive and semi-massive
sulphide mineralization and general sampling results corresponded to the appearance of the core for selected intervals.
BDRC made similar observations of the core
logging and geology data collection. The core logging information is acceptable for resource estimation purposes.
Database Verification
The Trilogy drill database has been reviewed,
and no significant concerns were noted. Nine holes were randomly selected from the Arctic database representing six percent of
the data. The assay grades from these holes were dumped from MineSight™ and compared to the values listed in certified assay
certificates. No errors were found.
The results of previous data verifications
by external Qualified Persons, completed for Trilogy, were also reviewed. The previous data verification exercises included extensive
reviews of all NovaGold drilling as well as drilling completed by previous operators. Based on the current review, BDRC believes
that the data verification completed on the Trilogy dataset is sufficiently robust to support resource estimation.
QA/QC Review
Standards, blanks, duplicates and check
samples have been regularly submitted at a combined level of 20% of sampling submissions for all NovaGold/NovaCopper/Trilogy era
campaigns. GeoSpark conducted QA/QC reviews of all sampling campaigns which included review for accuracy, precision and bias.
In addition to the QA/QC review, GeoSpark has been retained to provide ongoing database maintenance and QA/QC support.
BDRC has reviewed the QA/QC dataset and
reports and found the sample insertion rate and the timeliness of results analysis meets or exceeds industry best practices. The
QA/QC results indicate that the assay results collected by Trilogy, and previously by NovaGold and NovaCopper, are reliable and
suitable for the purpose of this study.
Qualified Person
Opinion
It is BDRC’s opinion that the drill
database and topographic surface for the Arctic Deposit is reliable and sufficient to support the purpose of this technical report
and a current mineral resource estimate.
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical
Testing
Metallurgical
Test Work Review
Introduction
The Arctic Deposit is a stratiform polymetallic
VMS deposit comprised of semi-massive and massive sulphides deposited in a highly variable metasedimentary and metavolcanic stratigraphy.
Hydrothermal alteration has resulted in the development of footwall magnesium-rich alteration characterized by abundant chlorite
and talc and hanging wall sodium-rich alteration characterized by paragonite. In the mineralized zone, the principal economic
minerals are chalcopyrite, sphalerite, galena, and minor tetrahedrite and bornite. Metallurgical studies have spanned over 30
years with metallurgical test work campaigns undertaken at the Kennecott Research Center, Lakefield Research Ltd., SGS Vancouver
(“
SGS
”) and ALS Metallurgy Kamloops, B.C.
The test work conducted in 2012 and 2017
has been under the technical direction of International Metallurgical and Environmental Inc. The basis of test work has been focused
on a traditional process flowsheet employing crushing, grinding, bulk flotation of a copper and lead concentrate, flotation of
a zinc concentrate and the subsequent separation of copper and lead values via flotation.
Mineral and Metallurgical
Test Work – 2012 to 2017
Introduction
Test work conducted prior to 2012 is considered
relevant to the project, but predictive metallurgical results are considered to be best estimated from test work conducted on
sample materials obtained from exploration work under the direction of Trilogy, conducted in 2012 and 2017.
In 2012, SGS conducted a test program on
the samples produced from mineralization zones 1, 2, 3, and 5 of the Arctic Deposit. To the extent known, the samples are representative
of the styles and types of mineralization and the mineral deposit as a whole. Drill core samples were composited from each of
the zones into four different samples for the SGS test work which included process mineralogical examination, grindability parameter
determination, and flotation tests.
SGS used QEMSCAN™, a quantitative
mineralogical technique utilizing scanning electron microscopy to determine mineral species, species liberation and mineral associations
in order to develop grade limiting/recovery relationships for the composites.
Standard Bond grindability tests were also
conducted on five selected samples to determine the BWi and Ai.
The flotation test work investigated the
effect of various process conditions on copper, lead and zinc recovery using copper-lead bulk flotation and zinc flotation followed
by copper and lead separation. The test work conducted in 2012 at SGS forms the bases for predicting metallurgical performance
of the mineralized zone in terms of recovery of copper and lead to a bulk concentrate as well as predicting zinc recovery to a
zinc concentrate.
In 2017, test work at ALS Metallurgy was
focused on predicting the expected performance of the proposed copper and lead separation process, which required the use of larger
test samples. A pilot plant was operated to generate approximately 50 kilograms of copper and lead concentrate, which became test
sample material in locked cycle testing of the copper and lead separation process. This test work allows for the accurate prediction
of copper and lead deportment in the process as well as provided detailed analysis of the final copper and lead concentrates,
expected from the process. Additional metallurgical test work in the form of variability samples being subject to grindability
and baseline flotation tests was also completed.
Test Samples
The 2012 test program used 90 individual
drill core sample intervals totaling 1,100 kg from the Arctic Deposit. Individual samples were combined into four composites representing
different zones and labelled as Composites Zone 1 & 2, Zone 3, Zone 5, and Zone 3 & 5. The sample materials used in the
2012 test program at SGS were specifically obtained for metallurgical test purposes. The drill cores were stored in a freezer
to ensure sample degradation and oxidation of sulphide minerals did not occur.
The 2017 test program involved the collection
of approximately 4000 kg of drill core from five drill holes within the Arctic Deposit. The core was shipped in its entirety to
ALS Metallurgy of Kamloops, B.C. for use in grinding and flotation test work. 15 separate composites samples were generated by
crushing defined intercepts of mineralization. These samples were riffle split to generate 15 individual samples which were separately
tested for grindability and flotation response, as well, a large portion of each sample was blended to make a single large composite
sample for use in copper-lead separation test work. The copper-lead separation test work involved operating a pilot plant for
the production of a single sample of copper/lead concentrate which was then used in bench-scale flotation testing, including open
circuit flotation tests as well as locked cycle flotation tests.
Mineralogical Investigation
SGS used QEMSCAN™ to complete a detailed
mineralogical study on each composite to identify mineral liberations and associations, and to develop grade/recovery limiting
relationships for the samples. Head assays indicate that all four composite samples contain a considerable amount of magnesium
oxide, implying the potential for significant talc which could impact flotation.
The mineralogical study showed that the
mineralogy of all four composites was similar. Each composite was composed mainly of pyrite, quartz, and carbonates. However,
Composite Zone 1 & 2 contains approximately 30% quartz, compared to 8.6% for Composite Zone 3, and 16.6% for Composite Zone
5. The study also showed that Composite Zone 1 & 2 had the lowest pyrite content (6.7%) while Composites Zone 3 and Zone 5
contained approximately 30.4% and 27.8% pyrite, respectively.
In all four samples, the major floatable
gangue minerals were talc and pyrite. Chalcopyrite was the main copper carrier. Combined bornite, tetrahedrite, and other sulphides
accounted for less than 5% of the copper minerals in the Zone 1 & 2, Zone 3, and Zone 3 & 5 composites. In the Zone 5
sample, a slightly higher amount of bornite accounted for approximately 9% of the copper minerals. Galena was the main lead mineral
(1.3% in the Zone 1 & 2 composite, and 2.1% in the other three composites) and sphalerite was the main zinc mineral (7.2%
in Zone 1 & 2 composite and 11 to 14% in the other three composites).
All the composites contained a significant
amount of talc, which may have the potential to consume reagents and dilute final concentrates. Therefore, SGS recommended that
talc removal using flotation be employed prior to base metal flotation.
At a grind size of approximately 90% passing
150 µm (ranging from 94.5 to 89% passing 150 µm), chalcopyrite liberation ranged from approximately 80 to 87% (free
and liberated combined) for all composites. The chalcopyrite is mostly free, with 7 to 10% associated with pyrite. For all composites,
galena liberation ranged from 54 to 68% (free and liberated combined). Sphalerite liberation varied between 81 to 89%. Sphalerite
is mostly free with about 7 to 10% associated with pyrite.
In general, SGS indicated that the liberation
of galena and chalcopyrite was adequate, and acceptable copper and lead metallurgical performance was expected within the rougher
circuit. Sphalerite was well liberated at the grind size.
Comminution Test Work
SGS conducted a comminution study on five
selected samples during the test program. The tests included the standard BWi test and Ai test.
With respect to the results of the grindability
tests, the BWi values range from 6.5 to 11 kWh/t for the materials sampled. The data indicates that the samples are not resistant
to ball mill grinding. The Ai ranged from 0.017 to 0.072 g, which indicates that the samples are not abrasive.
Flotation Test Work
In 2012, SGS conducted bench-scale flotation
test work to investigate the recovery of copper, lead, zinc, and associated precious metals using bulk copper-lead flotation and
zinc flotation, followed by copper and lead separation. The four composite samples were tested for rougher flotation kinetics,
cleaner efficiency, and copper and lead separation flotation efficiency. SGS also conducted locked cycle flotation tests on each
composite and these test results for the basis for predicting copper and zinc recovery to a bulk concentrate as well as predicting
zinc recovery to a zinc concentrate.
The tests produced similar metallurgical
performances among the samples tested, although the Zone 1 & 2 composite showed slightly inferior performance compared to
the Zone 3 composite and Zone 5 composite.
Flotation test work conducted in 2017 conducted
at ALS Metallurgy in Kamloops B.C., was focused on a detailed evaluation of the performance of a copper and lead separation process
including open circuit flotation tests and locked cycle flotation tests.
Open Circuit Flotation
Test Work
The initial flotation tests at SGS evaluated
rougher flotation kinetics by investigating the effect of various reagent regimes on the flotation kinetics of copper, lead, and
zinc minerals.
Cytec 3418A promoter and sodium isopropyl
xanthate (“
SIPX
”) were used as collectors in the copper and lead flotation circuits. Methyl isobutyl carbinol
was used as the frother to maintain a stable froth in the flotation stages. Hydrated lime was used as the pH regulator. Zinc cyanide,
a mixture of zinc sulphate and sodium cyanide, or zinc sulphate alone, was used to suppress zinc minerals that might report to
the copper and lead bulk concentrate.
Zinc was floated after the copper-lead
bulk flotation using the traditional reagent regime, including SIPX as the collector and copper sulphate as the sphalerite activator
at an elevated pH.
The feed material was ground to 80% passing
70 µm prior to talc pre-flotation. The talc flotation tailings were sent for copper-lead bulk flotation. The bulk copper-lead
flotation tailings were conditioned with copper sulphate to activate sphalerite prior to zinc rougher flotation.
Regrinding was included in the flowsheet
for both the copper-lead bulk concentrate and the zinc concentrate. The target regrind sizes were 80% passing 24 µm for
the copper-lead bulk concentrate and 40 µm for the zinc concentrate.
The reground bulk copper-lead concentrate
was cleaned to further reject sphalerite, pyrite, and other gangues. The reground zinc rougher concentrate was cleaned to produce
the final zinc concentrate.
The testing indicated that a primary grind
size of 80% passing 70 µm was adequate for the optimum copper-lead bulk rougher flotation and zinc rougher flotation. Copper
grade and recovery to the bulk copper/lead rougher concentrate ranged from 16 to 21% and from 86 to 94%, respectively. The bulk
concentrate also recovered between 89 and 94% lead, grading at 6.8 to 8.4%.
Gold and silver reported preferentially
to the bulk copper-lead rougher concentrate. Gold recovery ranged from 54 to 80% to the bulk copper and lead cleaner concentrate,
while silver recovery to the concentrate was in the range of between 68 and 84%.
Approximately 250 g/t of zinc cyanide was
required to effectively depress the zinc minerals during flotation of the copper and lead minerals. Although zinc sulphate could
be used as an alternative for zinc cyanide, approximately 1,500 g/t of zinc sulphate would be required, which is much higher than
the zinc cyanide dosage. SGS recommended further tests to optimize the reagent regimes for zinc mineral suppression.
The cleaner flotation tests showed that
regrinding was required to upgrade the bulk concentrates prior to separation of copper and lead minerals. The regrind size had
not been optimized. It appeared that a regrind size of 80% passing approximately 30 µm would provide sufficient liberation
for the bulk concentrate upgrading and copper-lead separation. Concentrate regrinding was incorporated into all locked cycle tests
and open circuit cleaning tests.
In the batch cleaner tests, lead was separated
from the bulk copper and lead concentrate using a procedure to float lead minerals and suppress copper minerals. With one stage
of lead rougher flotation and two stages of cleaner flotation, approximately 50 to 75% of the lead was recovered to the lead concentrate
containing 41 to 60% lead. A high-grade copper concentrate was produced, ranging between 29 and 31% copper. The concentrate recovered
between 75% and 91% of the copper from the bulk concentrates produced from the four composites.
Locked Cycle Test
SGS conducted six locked cycle tests to
simulate bulk copper-lead flotation and zinc flotation in closed circuit. The bulk copper and lead concentrates produced were
tested for copper and lead separation in an open circuit.
The copper recoveries to the bulk copper-lead
concentrates produced from the locked cycle tests were as follows:
|
·
|
89
to 92% for the Zone 3 & 5 composite
|
|
·
|
93%
for the Zone 3 composite
|
|
·
|
86
to 91% for the Zone 5 composite
|
|
·
|
84%
for the Zone 1 & 2 composite.
|
The Zone 1 & 2 composite produced a
lower copper recovery. This result is likely due to insufficient sample for developing optimized flotation conditions for this
sample. Additional work would likely bring this result in line with other sample test results.
The copper grades of the copper concentrate
produced ranged from 24 to 28%.
Approximately 88 to 94% of the lead was
recovered to the bulk copper-lead concentrates, which contained 9 to 13% lead.
Three of the four composites demonstrated
good zinc recovery in the locked cycle tests, excluding the Zone 1 & 2 composite sample.
The zinc recoveries to the final zinc concentrates
produced from the locked cycle tests were as follows:
|
·
|
92%
for the Zone 3 & 5 composite
|
|
·
|
93%
for the Zone 3 composite
|
|
·
|
91%
for the Zone 5 composite
|
|
·
|
84%
for the Zone 1 & 2 composite.
|
On average, the zinc grades of the concentrates
produced were higher than 55%, excluding the concentrate generated from Composite Zone 1 & 2, which contained only 44.5% zinc.
Once again, it is expected that the results of zone 1 & 2 will improve with additional test work, if sample were available.
Gold and silver were predominantly recovered
into the bulk copper-lead concentrates. Gold recoveries to this concentrate ranged from 65 to 80%, and silver recoveries ranged
from 80 to 86%.
Copper/Lead Separation
Test Work
SGS performed preliminary open-circuit
copper and lead separation tests on the bulk copper-lead concentrates produced from the locked cycle tests in open circuit flotation
tests. Sodium cyanide was used to suppress copper minerals; 3418A was used as the lead collector and lime added to adjust the
pulp pH to 10.
The copper concentrates that were produced
assayed at:
|
·
|
31%
copper from Composite Zone 3 & 5
|
|
·
|
31%
copper from Composite Zone 3
|
|
·
|
30%
copper from Composite Zone 5
|
|
·
|
28
to 29% copper from Composite Zone 1 & 2.
|
The lead second cleaner concentrates that
were produced contained:
|
·
|
41%
lead from Composite Zone 3 & 5
|
|
·
|
59%
lead from Composite Zone 3
|
|
·
|
67%
lead from Composite Zone 5
|
|
·
|
55%
lead from Composite Zone 1 & 2.
|
On average, the lead concentrates that
were produced from the Zone 1 & 2, Zone 3, and Zone 5 composites contained approximately 2.2% copper while the copper content
of the concentrate from the Zone 3 & 5 composite was higher, grading at 5%. There is a substantial reduction in lead recovery
when the lead first cleaner concentrate was further upgraded.
2017 ALS Metallurgy
ALS Metallurgy conducted detailed copper
and lead separation flotation test work using a bulk sample of copper-lead concentrate produced from the operation of a pilot
plant.
The lead concentrate produced from the
locked cycle work at ALS Metallurgy contained only about 24% lead, due to contamination of the concentrate with talc minerals.
This contamination is due to the high levels of talc in the sample provided for this specific test work. Lead concentrate grades
produced during the 2012 test work ranged from 41 to 59% lead using samples that had substantially lower levels of talc in the
process feed.
Expected Concentrate
Quality
ICP assays were conducted on the copper
and lead concentrates produced from the locked cycle tests at ALS Metallurgy and the zinc concentrate from the locked cycle tests
at SGS. The samples are thought to represent the expected concentrate quality.
The results indicated that key penalty
elements, as well as precious metals are typically concentrated into a lead concentrate, leaving the copper concentrate of higher
than expected quality given the levels of impurities seen in the test samples.
The lead concentrate may have penalties
for the high arsenic and antimony concentrations seen in the results of this test work.
Precious metal deportment into a lead concentrate
is very high and should benefit the payable levels of precious metals at a smelter.
Silicon dioxide and fluoride assays should
be conducted on the concentrates to determine whether or not they are higher than the penalty thresholds.
Within the zinc concentrates produced at
SGS in 2012 from the locked cycle tests, the cadmium content generally ranges from 2,100 to 3,400 ppm, which will likely be higher
than the penalty thresholds outlined by most zinc concentrate smelters. The arsenic content may be higher than the penalty mark
in the concentrate produced from Composite Zone 5. However, the mineralization from Zone 5 is not expected to be mined separately,
on average; therefore, the arsenic in the zinc concentrate should not attract a penalty.
Recommended
Test Work
In general, the flowsheet developed in
the 2012 test program and further tested in the 2017 test work program at ALS Metallurgy, is feasible for the Arctic mineralization.
Further metallurgical test work is recommended on representative samples to optimize the flowsheet and better understand the impact
of talc levels in the process feed samples. Lead concentrate quality is impacted by the level of talc in the process feed and
a better understanding of the level of talc in an expected process feed is critical in maximizing the value of a lead concentrate.
There are no outstanding metallurgical issues related to the production of a copper or zinc concentrate from all of the materials
tested.
On-going grinding test work is recommended
at some time in the future, including SAG mill characterization test work.
Mineral Resource Estimates
Introduction
This section describes the generation of
an updated mineral resource estimate for the Arctic Project. The mineral resource estimate has been prepared by Bruce M. Davis,
FAusIMM, BDRC and Robert Sim, P.Geo., SIM Geological Inc. Both are “Independent Qualified Persons” as defined in NI
43-101. Trilogy has filed several technical reports on the Arctic Deposit as described under the heading “
The Arctic
Project – History
”, the most recent one was a PEA authored by Tetra Tech with an effective date of September 12,
2013. During the summers of 2015 and 2016, Trilogy conducted drilling programs designed to upgrade previous in-pit Inferred Mineral
Resources to the Indicated category. During the fall of 2016, following the completion of the final drilling program, Trilogy
geologists reinterpreted the geologic units present in the vicinity of the Arctic deposit. This section incorporates the new geologic
model and all available sample data as of April 25, 2017.
This section describes the resource estimation
methodology and summarizes the key assumptions considered by the Qualified Persons. In the opinion of the Qualified Persons, the
resource evaluation reported herein is a sound representation of the mineral resources for the Arctic Project at the current level
of sampling. The mineral resources have been estimated in conformity with generally accepted CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources
and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines and are reported in accordance with the NI 43-101. Mineral resources are not mineral
reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resource will
be converted into mineral reserves.
The database used to estimate the Arctic
Project mineral resource was audited by the Qualified Persons. The Qualified Persons are of the opinion that the current drilling
information is sufficiently reliable to confidently interpret the boundaries of the mineralization and the assay data are sufficiently
reliable to support mineral resource estimation.
The resource estimate was generated using
MineSight® v11.60-2. Some non-commercial software, including the Geostatistical Library family of software, was used for geostatistical
analyses.
Resource
Classification
The mineral resources were classified in
accordance with the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (May 2014). The classification parameters
are defined relative to the distance between sample data and are intended to encompass zones of reasonably continuous mineralization
that exhibit the desired degree of confidence in the estimate.
Classification parameters are generally
linked to the scale of a deposit: a large and relatively low-grade porphyry-type deposit would likely be mined at a much higher
daily rate than a narrow, high-grade deposit. The scale of selectivity of these two examples differs significantly and this is
reflected in the drill-hole spacing required to achieve the desired level of confidence to define a volume of material that represents,
for example, a year of production. Based on engineering studies completed to date, the Arctic Deposit would likely be amenable
to open pit extraction methods at a production rate of approximately 10,000 tonnes per day. A drill hole spacing study, which
tests the reliability of estimates for a given volume of material at varying drill hole spacing, suggests that drilling on a nominal
100 m grid pattern would provide annual estimates of volume (tonnage) and grade within ±15% accuracy, 90% of the time.
These results were combined with grade and indicator variograms and other visual observations of the nature of the deposit in
defining the criteria for mineral resource classification as described below. At this stage of exploration, there is insufficient
density of drilling information to support the definition of mineral resources in the Measured category.
The following classification criteria are
defined for the Arctic Deposit:
|
·
|
Indicated
Mineral Resources includes blocks in the model with grades estimated by three or more
drill holes spaced at a maximum distance of 100 m, and exhibit a relatively high degree
of confidence in the grade and continuity of mineralization.
|
|
·
|
Inferred
Mineral Resources require a minimum of one drill hole within a maximum distance of 150
m and exhibit reasonable confidence in the grade and continuity of mineralization.
|
Some manual “smoothing” of
the criteria for Indicated Resources was conducted that includes areas where the drill hole spacing locally exceeds the desired
grid spacing, but still retains continuity of mineralization or, conversely, excludes areas where the mineralization does not
exhibit the required degree of confidence.
Mineral Resource
Estimate
CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources
and Mineral Reserves (May 2014) defines a mineral resource as:
“A mineral resource is
a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade or quality
and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade or quality, continuity
and other geological characteristics of a mineral resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence
and knowledge, including sampling”.
The “reasonable prospects for eventual
economic extraction” requirement generally implies that quantity and grade estimates meet certain economic thresholds and
that mineral resources are reported at an appropriate cut-off grade which takes into account the extraction scenarios and the
processing recovery.
The Arctic Deposit comprises several zones
of relatively continuous moderate- to high-grade polymetallic mineralization that extends from surface to depths of over 250 m
below surface. The deposit is potentially amenable to open pit extraction methods. The “reasonable prospects for eventual
economic extraction” was tested using a floating cone pit shell derived based on a series of technical and economic assumptions
considered appropriate for a deposit of this type, scale and location. These parameters are summarized in Table 11.
Table 11: Parameters Used to Generate a
Resource-Limiting Pit Shell
Optimization Parameters
|
Open Pit Mining Cost
|
US$3/tonne
|
Milling Cost + G&A
|
US$35/tonne
|
Pit Slope
|
43 degrees
|
Copper Price
|
US$3.00/lb
|
Lead Price
|
US$0.90/lb
|
Zinc Price
|
US$1.00/lb
|
Gold Price
|
US$1300/oz
|
Silver Price
|
US$18/oz
|
Metallurgical Recovery: Copper
|
92%
|
Lead
|
77%
|
Zinc
|
88%
|
Gold
|
63%
|
Silver
|
56%
|
Note: No
adjustments for mining recovery or dilution.
The pit shell has been generated about
copper equivalent grades that incorporate contributions of the five different metals present in the deposit. The formula used
to calculate copper equivalent grades is listed as follows:
CuEq%= (Cu% x 0.92) +(Zn% x 0.290)+(Pb%
x 0.231)+(Augpt x 0.398)+(Aggpt x 0.005)
It is important to recognize that discussions
regarding these surface mining parameters are used solely for the purpose of testing the “reasonable prospects for eventual
economic extraction,” and do not represent an attempt to estimate mineral reserves. These preliminary evaluations are used
to assist with the preparation of a Mineral Resource Statement and to select appropriate reporting assumptions.
Using the parameters defined above, a pit
shell was generated about the Arctic Deposit that extends to depths approaching 300 m below surface. Table 12 lists the estimate
of mineral resources contained within the pit shell. Based on the technical and economic factors listed in Table 12, a base case
cut-off grade of 0.50% CuEq is considered appropriate for this deposit. There are no known factors related to environmental, permitting,
legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, or political issues which could materially affect the mineral resource. It
is expected that a majority of Inferred resources will be converted to Indicated or Measured resources with additional exploration.
Table 12: Mineral Resource Estimate for
the Arctic Project
|
|
M
|
|
|
Average Grade:
|
|
|
Contained metal:
|
|
Class
|
|
tonnes
|
|
|
Cu %
|
|
|
Pb%
|
|
|
Zn%
|
|
|
Au g/t
|
|
|
Ag g/t
|
|
|
Cu Mlbs
|
|
|
Pb Mlbs
|
|
|
Zn Mlbs
|
|
|
Au koz
|
|
|
Ag Moz
|
|
Indicated
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
3.07
|
|
|
|
0.73
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
|
|
2441
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
3356
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Inferred
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
2.72
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Notes:
|
(1)
|
Resources stated as contained
within a pit shell developed using metal prices of US$3.00/lb Cu, $0.90/lb Pb, $1.00/lb
Zn, $1300/oz Au and $18/oz Ag and metallurgical recoveries of 92% Cu, 77% Pb, 88% Zn,
63% Au and 56% Ag and operating costs of $3/t mining and $35/t process and G&A. The
average pit slope is 43 degrees.
|
|
(2)
|
The base case cut-off grade
is 0.5% copper equivalent. CuEq = (Cu%x0.92)+(Zn%x0.290)+(Pb%x0.231)+(Augptx0.398)+(Aggptx0.005).
|
|
(3)
|
Mineral Resources are not
Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty
that all or any part of the Mineral Resources will be converted into Mineral Reserves.
|
|
(4)
|
Inferred resources have a
great amount of uncertainty as to whether they can be mined legally or economically.
It is reasonably expected that a majority of Inferred resources will be converted to
Indicated resources with additional exploration.
|
Exploration and Current Developments
In early June 2017, we announced the engagement
of Ausenco Engineering Canada Inc. (“Ausenco”) to prepare the Arctic Project Pre-feasibility Study technical report
(the “Arctic PFS”) which is anticipated to be completed in the first quarter of 2018. The Company has also engaged
Amec Foster Wheeler plc (“Amec”) to complete mine planning and SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (“SRK”) to
complete tailings and waste design, hydrology and environmental studies.
The summer field program for the Arctic
PFS was conducted in July 2017 with the completion of 257 meters of geotechnical drilling and 26 test pits completed to determine
site facility locations and mine design. We also completed geophysical ground surveys to evaluate ground conditions. We continued
our environmental baseline program through the summer of 2017 which includes baseline data collection on aquatic and avian resources,
ongoing water quality, hydrology and meteorology.
The results from the 2017 summer field
program are currently being compiled and analyzed by Ausenco, Amec and SRK. The timing of the field program will provide the information
required for completion of the Arctic PFS anticipated to be in first quarter of 2018.
We also completed 455 meters of infill
drilling at the Arctic Project in late August 2017 collecting core to provide two tonnes of material for an ore-sorting study
to be initiated in the fourth quarter of 2017
.
The assay results from the drilling have not yet been received by the Company.