NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES-

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The interim consolidated financial statements of Quest Solution, Inc. include the combined accounts of Quest Marketing, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, and Quest Exchange Ltd., a Canadian based holding company.

Divesture of Canadian Operations

Effective September 30, 2016, the Company sold all of the outstanding shares of Quest Solution Canada Inc., and the consideration received was $1.0 million in cash, which was all collected at June 30, 2017. In addition, the Company has redeemed 1 share of Preferred Class B Stock and 1,839,030 shares of Preferred Class C Stock of the Company, as well as the accrued dividend of $31,742 thereon. Lastly, Quest Exchange Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, redeemed 5,200,000 exchangeable shares as part of the divestiture.

Additionally, as part of the transaction, Viascan Group Inc., the acquirer, assumed $1.0 million of liabilities which the Company had at September 30, 2016. Other consideration that is part of the transaction included:

The operations of Quest Solution Canada Inc. have been classified as a discontinued operation and the assets and liabilities of Quest Solution Canada Inc. have been classified as held for disposal.

On December 31, 2016, the Company merged BCS in Quest Marketing to form one US legal entity as part of its streamlining efforts.

The interim consolidated financial statements included herein, presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and stated in US dollars, have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

These statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein. It is suggested that these interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 17, 2017. The Company follows the same accounting policies in the preparation of interim reports.

Operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2017.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of significant accounting policies of Quest Solution, Inc. is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management who is responsible for the integrity and objectivity of the financial statements. These accounting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

CASH

Cash consists of petty cash, checking, savings, and money market accounts. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, may exceed federal insured limits.

The Company has restricted cash on deposit with a federally insured bank in the amount of $684,610 at September 30, 2017. This cash is security and collateral for a corporate credit card agreement with a bank and for deposit against a letter of credit issued for executive life insurance policies owned by the Company.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Certain accounting policies involve judgments and uncertainties to such an extent that there is reasonable likelihood that materially different amounts could have been reported under different conditions, or if different assumptions had been used. The Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. The Company uses historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances to form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates and assumptions used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

PURCHASE ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

The Company accounts for its business combinations using the purchase method of accounting which requires that intangible assets be recognized apart from goodwill if they are contractual in nature or separately identifiable. Acquisitions are measured on the fair value of consideration exchanged and, if the consideration given is not cash, measurement is based on the fair value of the consideration given or the fair value of the assets acquired, whichever is more reliably measurable. The excess of cost of an acquired entity over the fair value of identifiable acquired assets and liabilities assumed is allocated to goodwill.

The valuation and allocation process relies on significant assumptions made by management. In certain situations, the allocations of excess purchase price are based upon preliminary estimates and assumptions. Accordingly, the allocations are subject to revision when the Company receives updated information, including appraisals and other analyses, which are completed within one year of the acquisition. Revisions to the fair values, which may be significant, are recorded when pending information is finalized, within one year from the acquisition date.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts. The Company provides allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable equal to the estimated collection losses that will be incurred in collection of all receivables. Accounts receivable are periodically evaluated for collectability based on past credit history with customers and their current financial condition. The Company’s management determines which accounts are past due and if deemed uncollectible, the Company charges off the receivable in the period the determination is made. The Company generally requires no collateral to secure its ordinary accounts receivable.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment are stated at purchased cost and depreciated using both straight-line and accelerated methods over estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 15 years. Upon disposition of property and equipment, related gains and losses are recorded in the results of operations. For federal income tax purposes, depreciation is computed using the modified accelerated cost recovery system. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments that extend the useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expenses as incurred.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated amortization. The assets are being amortized on the straight-line method over useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years. Amortization expense for the period ending September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $1,276,286 and $1,701,700, respectively.

The future amortization expense on the Trade Names and Customer Relationships are as follows:

Goodwill is not amortized, but is evaluated for impairment annually or when indicators of a potential impairment are present. Our impairment testing of goodwill is performed separately from our impairment testing of intangibles. The annual evaluation for impairment of goodwill and intangibles is based on valuation models that incorporate assumptions and internal projections of expected future cash flows and operating plans. None of the goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes.

Purchased intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, if any. The Company’s finite-lived intangible assets consist of customer relationships, contractor and resume databases, trade names, and internal use software and are being amortized over periods ranging from two to nine years. Purchased intangible assets are reviewed annually to determine if facts and circumstances indicate that the useful life is shorter than originally estimated or that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. If such facts and circumstances exist, recoverability is assessed by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their remaining lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairments, if any, are based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. If the useful life is shorter than originally estimated, the rate of amortization is accelerated and the remaining carrying value is amortized over the new shorter useful life. No impairments were identified or changes to estimated useful lives have been recorded as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

ADVERTISING

The Company generally expenses advertising costs as incurred. During the nine month periods ending September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company spent $183,301 and $77,205 on advertising (marketing, trade show and store front expense), net of co-operative rebates, respectively. The Company received rebates on advertising from co-operative advertising agreements with several vendors and suppliers. These rebates have been recorded as a reduction to the related advertising and marketing expense in the periods they are received.

INVENTORY

Substantially all inventory consists of raw materials and finished goods and are valued based upon first-in first-out (“FIFO”) cost, not in excess of market. The determination of whether the carrying amount of inventory requires a write-down is based on a detailed evaluation of inventory relative to any potential slow moving products or discontinued items as well as the market conditions for the specific inventory items.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

Depreciation and amortization expense primarily consists of the non-cash write-down of tangible and intangible assets over their expected economic lives. We expect this expense to continue to grow in absolute dollars and potentially as a percentage of revenue as we continue to grow and incur capital expenditures to improve our technological infrastructure and acquire assets through potential future acquisitions.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. Applicable accounting guidance provides a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that prioritize the use of observable inputs over the use of unobservable inputs, when such observable inputs are available. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

Assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. The Company reviews the fair value hierarchy classification on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observable inputs may result in a reclassification of assets and liabilities within the three levels of the hierarchy outlined above.

Liabilities Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The Company measures certain liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis such as our contingent consideration related to business combinations and recognizes transfers within the fair value hierarchy at the end of the fiscal quarter in which the change in circumstances that caused the transfer occurred. There have been no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 assets or liabilities during the period ending September 30, 2017 or fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.

The Company has classified its contingent consideration related to the acquisitions as a Level 3 liability. Revenue and other assumptions used in the calculation require significant management judgment. The Company reassesses the fair value of the contingent consideration liabilities on a quarterly basis. Based on that assessment, the Company recognized an adjustment of $0 to the actual calculation of the earn-out obligations during the quarter ending September 30, 2017 and in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company does not have any unrecorded contingent liabilities.

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

Net loss per share is provided in accordance with FASB ASC 260-10, “Earnings per Share”. Basic net loss per common share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average shares outstanding, assuming all dilutive potential common shares were issued, unless doing so is anti-dilutive. The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for computing basic EPS for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were 35,587,238 and 36,506,733, respectively. Diluted net loss per share of common stock is the same as basic net loss per share of common stock because the effects of potentially dilutive securities are antidilutive.

Dilutive securities are excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share because such securities have no anti-dilutive impact due to losses reported.

GOODWILL

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired business. Goodwill is tested annually at December 31 for impairment. The annual qualitative or quantitative assessments involve determining an estimate of the fair value of reporting units in order to evaluate whether an impairment of the current carrying amount of goodwill exists. A qualitative assessment evaluates whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The first step of a quantitative goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss may be recognized. The amount of impairment loss is determined by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value then an impairment loss is recognized equal to that excess. No impairment charges have been recorded as a result of the Company’s annual impairment assessments.

We test our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, or, under certain circumstances, more frequently, such as when events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. We are required to write down the value of goodwill only when our testing determines the recorded amount of goodwill exceeds the fair value. Our annual measurement date for testing goodwill impairment is December 31, at which date we test our reporting units, which is currently our ownership in Quest Solution, Inc.

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

The consolidated financial statements of the Company are presented in U.S. dollars. The functional currency for the Company is U.S. dollars. Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are recorded using the appropriate exchange rate at the time of the transaction. All of the Company’s continuing operations are conducted in U.S. dollars. The Company owns a non-operating subsidiary in Canada, from which it has received no revenue since October 1, 2016. Canadian records of the divested Canadian operation were maintained in the local currency and re-measured to the functional currency as follows: monetary assets and liabilities are converted using the balance sheet period-end date exchange rate, while the non-monetary assets and liabilities are converted using the historical exchange rate. Expenses and income items are converted using the weighted average exchange rates for the reporting period. Foreign transaction gains and losses are reported on the consolidated statement of operations and were included in the amount of loss from discontinued operations.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15 requiring management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, which is currently performed by the external auditors. Management will be required to perform this assessment for both interim and annual reporting periods and must make certain disclosures if it concludes that substantial doubt exists. This ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning on or after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material effect on our financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued new revenue recognition guidance under ASU 2014-09 that will supersede the existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). The new standard focuses on creating a single source of revenue guidance for revenue arising from contracts with customers for all industries. The objective of the new standard is for companies to recognize revenue when it transfers the promised goods or services to its customers at an amount that represents what the company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date by one year (ASU 2015-14). This ASU will now be effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning on or after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2016. Since the issuance of the original standard, the FASB has issued several other subsequent updates including the following: 1) clarification of the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations (ASU 2016-08); 2) further guidance on identifying performance obligations in a contract as well as clarifications on the licensing implementation guidance (ASU 2016-10); 3) rescission of several SEC Staff Announcements that are codified in Topic 605 (ASU 2016-11); and 4) additional guidance and practical expedients in response to identified implementation issues (ASU 2016-12). The new standard will be effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and we expect to implement the standard with the modified retrospective approach, which recognizes the cumulative effect of application recognized on that date. We are evaluating the impact of adoption on our consolidated results of operations, consolidated financial position and cash flows.

In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2015-11 (ASC 330) , Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory . This guidance requires companies to measure inventory using the lower of cost and net realizable value. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt ASU 2015-11 as of January 1, 2017 on a prospective basis and there is expected to be no impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes , which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes. The ASU requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as non-current in a statement of financial position, thereby simplifying the current guidance that requires an entity to separate deferred assets and liabilities into current and noncurrent amounts. The Company early adopted ASU 2015-17 as of January 31, 2016 on a prospective basis. The statement of financial position as of January 31, 2016 reflects the classification of deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 amending the existing accounting standards for lease accounting and requiring lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for all leases with lease terms of more than 12 months, including those classified as operating leases. Both the asset and liability will initially be measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments, with the asset being subject to adjustments such as initial direct costs. Consistent with current U.S GAAP, the presentation of expenses and cash flows will depend primarily on the classification of the lease as either a finance or an operating lease. The new standard also requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases in order to provide additional information about the nature of an organization’s leasing activities. This ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018 and requires modified retrospective application. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09 amending several aspects of share-based payment accounting. This guidance requires all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies to be recorded in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled, with prospective application required. The guidance also changes the classification of such tax benefits or tax deficiencies on the statement of cash flows from a financing activity to an operating activity, with retrospective or prospective application allowed. Additionally, the guidance requires the classification of employee taxes paid when an employer withholds shares for tax-withholding purposes as a financing activity on the statement of cash flows, with retrospective application required. This ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) (“ASU 2016-08”). ASU 2016-08 does not change the core principle of Topic 606 but clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. ASU 2016-08 is effective for the annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We are currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2016-08 on our consolidated financial statements and results of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments, including trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities and loans, and requires entities to use a new forward-looking expected loss model that will result in the earlier recognition of allowance for losses. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for a fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted. We are currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements and results of operations.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 reduces diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 provide guidance on specific cash flow issues including debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, and distributions received from equity method investees. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We are currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2016-15 on our consolidated financial statements and results of operations.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. This new standard clarifies the definition of a business and provides a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018; however, early adoption is permitted with prospective application to any business development transaction.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) that will eliminate the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, impairment charge will be based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value. The guidance is effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2023. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements, absent any goodwill impairment.

The Company has evaluated other recent pronouncements and believes that none of them will have a material effect on the company’s financial statements.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has acquired a significant working capital deficit and issued a substantial amount of subordinated debt in connection with its acquisitions. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had a working capital deficit of $14,811,674 and an accumulated deficit of $34,758,766. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis to obtain additional debt or equity financing for working capital (i.e., vendor trade credit extensions) or refinancing (restructuring of subordinated debt) as may be required and, ultimately, to attain profitable operations. Management is focused on reducing operating expenses. Management’s plans to eliminate the going concern situation include, but are not limited to, the raise of additional capital through the issuance of debt and equity, improved cash flow management, aggressive cost reductions, and the creation of additional sales and profits across its product lines. One initiative to reduce operating expense and start the path to attaining profitability was the sale of Quest Solution Canada Inc. primarily because it had incurred significant operating losses and negative cash flow. In order to mitigate the risk related with this uncertainty, the Company may issue additional shares of common and preferred stock for cash and services during the next 12 months.

NOTE 3 – CONCENTRATIONS

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable. Beginning January 1, 2015, all of our cash balances were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000 per depositor at each financial institution. This coverage is available at all FDIC member institutions. The Company uses Wells Fargo Bank, which is an FDIC insured institution. The restricted cash in the amount of $684,610 at September 30, 2017 is in excess of the FDIC limit.

For the nine months and year ending September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, one customer accounted for 16.0% and 17.3% of the Company’s revenues, respectively.

Accounts receivable at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are made up of trade receivables due from customers in the ordinary course of business. One customer made up 21.6% and another customer 33.1% of the trade accounts receivable balances at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Accounts payable are made up of payables due to vendors in the ordinary course of business at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. One vendor made up 86.4% and 76.4%, respectively of the outstanding balance, which represented greater than 10% of accounts payable at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

NOTE 4 –DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS – DIVESTURE OF QUEST SOLUTION CANADA, INC.

Effective September 30, 2016, the Company sold all of the outstanding shares of Quest Solution Canada Inc. The Company decided to sell this division primarily because it has incurred significant operating losses.

The consideration received was $1.0 million in cash, which was all collected at June 30, 2017. In addition, the Company has redeemed 1 share of Preferred Class B Stock and 1,839,030 shares of Preferred Class C Stock of the Company, as well as the accrued dividend of $31,742 thereon. Lastly, Quest Exchange Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, redeemed 5,200,000 exchangeable shares as part of the divestiture.

Additionally, as part of the transaction, Viascan Group Inc., the acquirer, assumed $1.0 million of liabilities which the Company had at September 30, 2016. Other consideration that was part of the transaction included:

On September 30, 2016, the Company divested its Canadian operations, Quest Solution Canada, Inc., in order to focus its efforts and resources on its US operations. This represented a strategic shift that had a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results.

Accordingly, the assets and liabilities, operating results, and operating and investing activities cash flows for the former Canadian operations are presented as a discontinued operation separate from the Company’s continuing operations, for all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements and footnotes, unless indicated otherwise.

The following is a reconciliation of the major line items constituting pretax loss of discontinued operations to the after-tax loss of discontinued operations that are presented in the condensed consolidated statements of operations as indicated below:

The major classes of assets and liabilities of Quest Solution Canada Inc. were classified as held for disposal as at September 30, 2016, as follows:

The net cash flows incurred by Quest Solution Canada Inc. for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 are presented below:

The Company has purchased key man life insurance policies for some of its executives to insure the Company against risk of loss of an executive. Should loss of an executive occur, those funds would be used to pay off their respective promissory notes, repurchase their shares and settle out any amounts owed to them and their estate.

.

On June 10, 2016, the Company entered into an assignment whereby the insured individuals would assume the key man insurance policies. The agreement stated that the Company assign the policy over to the insured and the insured would assume all the obligations under the premium financed note in place. At September 30, 2017, the three life insurance policies and premium financed notes have been transferred to the insureds.

At September 30, 2017, the balance of amount of the remaining premium financed note is $1,482,850 and the cash value of the policy as of this date is $1,425,537, with a net positive cash value of the policy of $57,313.

The value of the policies is recorded at the new value per the right of offset noted in Topics 210-220. To have a right of offset, the Company would need to show (1) amounts of debt are determinable, (2) reporting entity has the ‘right’ to setoff, (3) the right is enforceable by law, and (4) reporting entity has the ‘intention’ to setoff. Given that the Company has met all of these, the Company has elected to use the right of setoff as the cash value of the policies is being used as the collateral for the loans. Should the Company default on payments to the policy or determine to not continue with the policies, the cash value of the policy is intended to pay off the loan. The Company also intends to settle out the loans in the future with the cash value of the policy.

NOTE 9 – DEFERRED REVENUE

Deferred revenue consists of prepaid third party hardware service agreements, software maintenance service contracts and the related costs and expenses recorded net of the revenue charged to the customer and paid within normal business terms. The net amount recorded as a deferred revenue liability is being recognized into the results of operations over the related periods on a straight line basis, normally 1-5 years with 3 years being the average term.

Expected future recognition of net deferred revenue as of September 30, 2017, is as follows;

NOTE 10 – CREDIT FACILITIES AND LINE OF CREDIT

On July 1, 2016, the Company entered into a Factoring and Security Agreement (the “FASA”) with Action Capital Corporation (“Action”) to establish a sale of accounts facility, whereby the Company may obtain short-term financing by selling and assigning to Action acceptable accounts receivable. Pursuant to the FASA, the outstanding principal amount of advances made by Action to the Company at any time shall not exceed $5,000,000. Action will reserve and withhold an amount in a reserve account equal to 10% of the face amount of each account purchased under the FASA. The balance at September 30, 2017 was $3,677,661 and at December 31, 2016 $5,059,292 which includes accrued interest.

The per annum interest rate with respect to the daily average balance of unpaid advances outstanding under the FASA (computed on a monthly basis) will be equal to the “Prime Rate” of Wells Fargo Bank N.A. plus 2%, plus a monthly fee equal to 0.75% of such average outstanding balance. The Company shall also pay all other costs incurred by Action under the FASA, including all bank fees. The FASA will continue in full force and effect unless terminated by either party upon 30 days’ prior written notice. Performance of the Company’s obligations under the FASA is secured by a security interest in certain collateral of the Company. The FASA includes customary representations and warranties and default provisions for transactions of this type.

Future maturities of notes payable as of September 30, 2017 are as follows;

The Company finances its Property and Casualty as well as its Directors and Officers Liability Insurance with First Insurance Funding. The Insurance period is for 12 months and the premium is financed over 9 months. The Property and Casualty Insurance is paid in equal monthly installments of $3,940 at 3.25% interest. The outstanding balance at September 30, 2017 was $0 and the monthly payments are current. The Directors and Officers Liability Insurance is renewed annually and is paid in four equal installments of $17,121 at 3.25% interest. The outstanding balance at September 30, 2017 was $0 and the monthly payments are current.

In September 2017 the Property & Casualty policy were extended for a period of 60 days.

In connection with the BCS acquisition the Company assumed a related party note payable to the former CTO of the RFID division of BCS. The note is payable in equal monthly installments of $4,758 beginning October 31, 2014 and ending October 2018. The loan bears interest at 1.89% and is unsecured and subordinated to the Company’s bank debt. The balance on this loan at September 30, 2017 was $130,294 of which all of it was classified as long term. In July 2016, the holder of the note signed a subordination agreement with the Supplier of the Secured Promissory Note and Action, whereby the noteholder agrees to subordinate its right to payment of capital and interest until the Supplier with the Secured Promissory Note is reimbursed in full.

In January 2016, the Company entered into a Stock Redemption Agreement whereby the Company would repurchase 507,079 shares of common stock for $230,490 on an installment basis which was recorded as a note on the transaction date carrying interest at 9%. As at September 30, 2017, the Company did not complete the redemption of 507,079 shares of common stock and the remaining balance of the note is $220,490.

On July 18, 2016, the Company and the supplier entered into that certain Secured Promissory Note, with an effective date of July 1, 2016, in the principal amount of $12,492,137. The USD Note accrues interest at 12% per annum and is payable in six consecutive monthly installments of principal and accrued interest in a minimum principal amount of $250,000 each, with any remaining principal and accrued interest due and payable on December 31, 2016. On November 30, 2016, the Company entered into an Amendment Agreement to the secured Promissory Note whereby the maturity date was extended to March 31, 2017 and the monthly installments of principal and accrued interest were increased to $400,000 commencing December 15, 2016 with any remaining principal and accrued interest due and payable on March 31, 2017. The Amendment also provides that the Company will make an additional principal payment of $300,000 by December 15, 2016. On March 31, 2017, the Company entered into a Second Amendment Agreement to the secured Promissory Note whereby the maturity date was extended to September 30, 2017 whereby any remaining principal and accrued interest is due and payable on September 30, 2017. The Amendment also provides that the Company will continue to make monthly installments of principal and accrued interest in a minimum principal amount of $400,000 each. On September 30, 2017, the Company entered into a Third Amendment Agreement to the secured Promissory Note whereby the maturity date was extended to October 31, 2017. The Amendment also provides that the Company will continue to make monthly installments of principal and accrued interest in a minimum principal amount of $600,000 each. On November 15 ^th , the Company entered into a Fourth Amendment extending the maturity date to December 31 ^st , and this Fourth Amendment is effective on October 31 ^st , whereby any remaining principal and accrued interest is due and payable on December 31, 2017. The Amendment also provides that the Company will continue to make monthly installments of principal and accrued interest in a minimum principal amount of $600,000 each.

On July 31, 2016 as part of the Separation Agreement with Mr. Ross, the Company issued a promissory note in the amount of $59,500 in connection with the redemption by the Company of 350,000 shares of restricted common stock. The promissory was paid off in 12 monthly installments commencing October 1, 2016 and this transaction was recorded as a restructuring charge in the amount of $84,317 in the third quarter of 2016. In addition, the Company restated a promissory note in favor of Mr. Ross which was paid at the balance of the $102,000 over 12 monthly installments commencing October 1, 2016. The balance on these two notes at September 30, 2017 was $0.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded interest expense in connection with these notes in the amount of $496,850 and $523,586, respectively.

The note payable for acquisition of Quest was issued on January 9, 2014 in conjunction with the acquisition of Quest Marketing, Inc. The initial interest rate was 1.89%, subsequent to December 31, 2015; the interest was increased to 6% and is due in 2018. Principal and interest payments have been postponed. In addition, on June 17, 2016, the Company entered into Promissory Note Conversion Agreement with one of the Noteholders whereby $684,000 of the promissory note was converted into 684,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock. As part of the transaction, the related debt discount of $171,000 was recorded against Additional paid in capital. As part of the acquisition of Quest Marketing, the Company engaged an independent valuation analysis to do a valuation of the purchase accounting. In July 2016, the holders of the notes signed subordination agreements with the Supplier who holds the Secured Promissory Note and Action, whereby the noteholders agree to subordinate their rights and payments until the Secured Promissory Note with the Supplier is reimbursed in full. As a result, the balance on this loan and related accrued interest at September 30, 2017 were all classified as long term.

The note payable for acquisition of BCS was issued on November 21, 2014 in conjunction with the acquisition of BCS. The current interest is at 1.89% and is due in 2018. This note is convertible at $2.00 per share, subject to board approval such that no debt holder can own more than 5% of the outstanding shares. Principal and interest payments have been postponed. In July 2016, the holders of the notes signed subordination agreements with the holder of the Secured Promissory Note and Action, whereby the noteholder agree to subordinate its right and payment of capital and interest until the Supplier who holds the Secured Promissory Note is reimbursed in full. As a result, the balance on this loan and related accrued interest at September 30, 2017 were all classified as long term.

The Quest preferred stock 6% note payable is in conjunction with the promissory note issued in October 2015 related to the redemption and cancelation of 100% of the issued and outstanding Series A preferred stock as well as 3,400,000 stock options that had been issued to a now former employee. The principal payments have been postponed. In June 2016, the holder of the note granted the Company a forgiveness of debt in the amount of $75,000 which was recorded as an increase in the additional paid in capital because it was a related party transaction. In addition, on June 17, 2016, the Company entered into Promissory Note Conversion Agreement with the Noteholder whereby $1,800,000 of the promissory note was converted into 1,800,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock. In July 2016, the holders of the notes signed subordination agreements with the Supplier of the Secured Promissory Note and Action, whereby the noteholder agree to subordinate its right and payment of capital and interest until the Supplier with the Secured Promissory Note is reimbursed in full. As a result, the balance on this loan and related accrued interest at September 30, 2017 were all classified as long term.

The repayment of the subordinated notes payable is contingent on the complete reimbursement of the Supplier Secured Promissory Note and other conditions and as such based on these factors management has estimated that the future maturities of subordinated notes payable at September 30, 2017 is as follows:

NOTE 13 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

PREFERRED STOCK

Series A

As of September 30, 2017, there were 1,000,000 Series A preferred shares designated and 0 Series A preferred shares outstanding. The board of directors had previously set the voting rights for the preferred stock at 1 share of preferred to 250 common shares.

Series B

As of September 30, 2017 there was 1 preferred share designated and 0 preferred shares outstanding. Effective on September 30, 2016, with the divestiture of Quest Solution Canada Inc., the one share was redeemed by the Company and retired.

Series C

As of September 30, 2017, there were 15,000,000 Series C preferred shares authorized and 3,143,530 Series C preferred shares outstanding. It has preferential rights above common shares and the Series B preferred shares and is entitled to receive a quarterly dividend at a rate of $0.06 per share per annum. Each Series C preferred share outstanding is convertible into one (1) share of common stock of Quest Solution, Inc.

COMMON STOCK

For the nine month period ended September 30, 2017, the Company issued 87,500 shares to board members in relation to the vesting schedule agreed to during 4 ^th quarter 2015, which is based on an annual grant of 100,000 restricted shares every October and vesting over 8 quarters per independent board member as compensation. The shares were valued at $9,501.

In addition, pursuant to the Employee Stock Purchase Program (“ESPP”) for which the Company filed an S-8 registration statement, 264,423 shares of Common Stock were issued for proceeds of $21,060.

In April 2017, the Company issued 640,000 shares to the Chief Executive Officer as a signing bonus under his Employment Agreement. The shares were valued at $48,000. In addition, the Company issued 70,000 shares to the Chief Financial Officer as additional fees pursuant to his Contractor Agreement. The shares were valued at $8,400

As of September 30, 2017 the Company had 36,157,422 common shares outstanding.

Outstanding warrants as of September 30, 2017 are as follows:

Warrants outstanding at September 30, 2017 and 2016 have the following expiry date and exercise prices:

Share Purchase Option Plan

The Company has a stock option plan whereby the Board of Directors, may grant to directors, officers, employees, or consultants of the Company options to acquire common shares. The Board of Directors of the Company has the authority to determine the terms, limits, restrictions and conditions of the grant of options, to interpret the plan and make all decisions relating thereto. The plan was adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors on November 17, 2014 in order to provide an inducement and serve as a long term incentive program. The maximum number of common shares that may be reserved for issuance was set at 10,000,000.

The option exercise price is established by the Board of Directors 0and may not be lower than the market price of the common shares at the time of grant. The options may be exercised during the option period determined by the Board of Directors, which may vary, but will not exceed ten years from the date of the grant. There are 10,000,000 of the Company’s common shares which may be issued pursuant to the exercise of share options granted under the Plan. As at September 30, 2017, the Company had issued options, allowing for the subscription of 9,125,000 common shares of its share capital.

Stock Options - The following table summarizes information about stock options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted a total of 6,481,000 stock options, 2,200,000 stock options were granted to five Board members and 3,781,000 stock options were granted to the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to his Employment Contract and 500,000 to Company’s legal counsel.

Outstanding stock options as of September 30, 2017 are as follows: