Item 1.
Financial
Statements
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per
share amounts)
|
|
September 30,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate, at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
10,385
|
|
|
$
|
7,600
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
30,885
|
|
|
|
22,475
|
|
Tenant improvements
|
|
|
5,901
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total real estate, at cost
|
|
|
47,171
|
|
|
|
30,075
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Net real estate held for investment
|
|
|
46,592
|
|
|
|
30,048
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
22,204
|
|
|
|
33,003
|
|
Deposits and other assets, net
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
70,143
|
|
|
$
|
63,327
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant improvements payable
|
|
$
|
5,900
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Offering cost liability
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
Rents received in advance and tenant security deposits
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
|
|
2,542
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
10,183
|
|
|
|
2,888
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7 and 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, 50,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 50,000,000 shares and no shares authorized, and 3,501,147 shares and no shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share, no shares and 49,000,000 shares authorized, and no shares and 3,416,508 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Class B common stock, par value $0.001 per share, no shares and 1,000,000 shares authorized, and no shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
65,027
|
|
|
|
64,828
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(5,071
|
)
|
|
|
(4,392
|
)
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
|
|
59,960
|
|
|
|
60,439
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
70,143
|
|
|
$
|
63,327
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations
for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per
share amounts)
|
|
For the Three
Months Ended
September 30,
2017
|
|
|
For the Nine
Months Ended
September 30,
2017
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$
|
1,495
|
|
|
$
|
4,074
|
|
Tenant reimbursements
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
|
4,138
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property expenses
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
4,204
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
4,934
|
|
Income / (loss) from operations
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
(796
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Net income / (loss)
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
$
|
(679
|
)
|
Net income / (loss) per share (basic and diluted)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
3,392,508
|
|
|
|
3,369,308
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Stockholders' Equity
for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
Shares
of
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
3,416,508
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
64,828
|
|
|
$
|
(4,392
|
)
|
|
$
|
60,439
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
Reclassification
of Class A and Class B common stock to common stock
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common
stock dividends
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,050
|
)
|
Net
issuance of unvested restricted stock
|
|
|
84,639
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
Balance,
September 30, 2017
|
|
|
3,501,147
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
65,027
|
|
|
$
|
(5,071
|
)
|
|
$
|
59,960
|
|
* Effective as of January 26, 2017, each share of the
Company’s outstanding Class A common stock and Class B common stock was reclassified as, and became one share of, a new
single class of common stock named “common stock”. There were no shares of Class B common stock outstanding as of
January 26, 2017, as all such shares were redeemed by the Company for $0.001 per share (par value) immediately prior to the
Company's initial public offering in December 2016.
See accompanying notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Cash Flows
for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(679
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
553
|
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation awards
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits and other assets, net
|
|
|
(882
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
538
|
|
Security deposit
|
|
|
418
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments in real estate
|
|
|
(11,185
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(11,196
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Initial public offering costs
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
Dividends paid to common stockholders
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(1,099
|
)
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(10,799
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, December 31, 2016
|
|
|
33,003
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, September 30, 2017
|
|
$
|
22,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual for common stock dividend declared
|
|
$
|
525
|
|
Accrual for offering costs
|
|
|
190
|
|
Accrual for tenant improvements
|
|
|
5,900
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
September 30, 2017
(Unaudited)
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(the "Company", "we", "us" and "our"), formerly known as Innovative Greenhouse Properties,
Inc. and incorporated in Maryland on June 15, 2016, was formed to own specialized industrial real estate assets primarily leased
to tenants in the regulated medical-use cannabis industry.
On December 5, 2016, the Company completed
its initial public offering of 3,350,000 shares of its Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at a public offering price
of $20.00 per share. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $61.1 million from the offering.
As of September 30, 2017, the Company owned
two properties in New York and Maryland. The New York property is a 127,000 square foot industrial property, which the Company
purchased in December 2016 for approximately $30.0 million (plus approximately $75,000 in transaction costs). The Maryland property
is a 72,000 square foot industrial property, which was under development when the Company purchased the property in May 2017 for
an initial purchase price of approximately $8.0 million (plus approximately $185,000 in transaction costs). The Company paid an
additional $3.0 million to the seller of the Maryland property upon completion of certain development milestones in August 2017,
and reimbursed the tenant at the Maryland property an additional $5.9 million for tenant improvements in October 2017. Subsequent
to the funding of the tenant improvements, the Company's total investment in the Maryland property was $16.9 million (excluding
transaction costs).
IIP Operating Partnership, LP, a Delaware
limited partnership (the "Operating Partnership"), was formed on June 20, 2016 and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company. The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and conducts substantially all of its business through
the Operating Partnership.
|
2.
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Procedures
and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
Basis of Presentation.
The
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States ("GAAP") for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X. They do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The comparative
financial statements for the periods from June 15, 2016 (date of incorporation) through September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 through
September 30, 2016 have been omitted as the Company had no significant operations during the period.
This interim financial information should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period from
June 15, 2016 (date of incorporation) through December 31, 2016.
Management believes that all adjustments
of a normal, recurring nature considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. This interim financial information
does not necessarily represent or indicate what the operating results will be for the year ending December 31, 2017.
Federal Income Taxes.
We
intend to elect and to operate our business so as to qualify, and to be taxed, as a real estate investment trust ("REIT")
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2017. Under the REIT operating structure,
we are permitted to deduct dividends paid to our stockholders in determining our taxable income. Assuming our dividends equal or
exceed our taxable net income, we generally will not be required to pay federal corporate income taxes on such income. The income
taxes recorded on our consolidated statement of operations represent amounts paid for city and state income and franchise taxes
and are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Use of Estimates.
The
preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make a number of
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates and assumptions.
Acquisition of Real Estate Properties.
Our
investment in real estate is recorded at historical cost, less accumulated depreciation. Upon acquisition of a property, the tangible
and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are initially measured based upon their relative fair values. We estimate
the fair value of land by reviewing comparable sales within the same submarket and/or region and the fair value of buildings on
an as-if vacant basis. Acquisition costs are capitalized as incurred. The acquisitions of our two properties in New York and Maryland
were each recorded as an asset acquisition.
Depreciation.
We are
required to make subjective assessments as to the estimated useful lives of our depreciable assets. We consider the period of future
benefit of the assets to determine the appropriate estimated useful lives. Depreciation of our assets is charged to expense on
a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives. We depreciate each of our buildings over its estimated useful life of 35
years. We depreciate tenant improvements at our buildings over the shorter of the estimated useful lives or the terms of the related
leases.
Provision for Impairment.
Another
significant judgment must be made as to if, and when, impairment losses should be taken on a property when events or a change in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. A provision is made for impairment if estimated
future operating cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) plus estimated disposition proceeds (undiscounted) are
less than the current book value of the property. Key inputs that we utilize in this analysis include projected rental rates, estimated
holding periods, capital expenditures and property sales capitalization rates. As of September 30, 2017, no impairment losses were
recognized.
Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable.
Our
leases and future tenant leases are expected to be triple-net leases, an arrangement under which the tenant is responsible for
all aspects of and costs related to the property and its operation during the lease term, including structural repairs, maintenance,
taxes and insurance. We anticipate that all leases will be accounted for as operating leases. Under this method, leases that have
fixed and determinable rent increases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, unless the collectability of
minimum lease payments is not reasonably predictable. Contractually obligated reimbursements from tenants for recoverable real
estate taxes and operating expenses are included in tenant reimbursements in the period when such costs are incurred.
Future contractual minimum rent (including
base rent, supplemental base rent (for our property in New York) and property management fees) under the operating leases as of
September 30, 2017 for future periods is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Year
|
|
Contractual Minimum Rent
|
|
2017 (three months ending December 31)
|
|
$
|
1,953
|
|
2018
|
|
|
7,964
|
|
2019
|
|
|
8,201
|
|
2020
|
|
|
8,448
|
|
2021
|
|
|
8,661
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
96,151
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
131,378
|
|
We recognize an allowance for
doubtful accounts relating to accounts receivable for amounts deemed uncollectible. We consider tenant specific issues, such
as financial stability and ability to pay, when determining collectability of accounts receivable and appropriate allowances
to record. We record revenue for each of our properties on a cash basis due to the uncertainty of collectability of lease
payments from each tenant due to its limited operating history. Rent received in advance of the contractual due date is
recorded as a liability until earned. Rent under the lease for the property we acquired in Maryland in May 2017 was
subject to an initial rent abatement of three months, and as such, no rental revenues were generated from that property until
August 26, 2017.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
. We consider
all highly-liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2017,
$12.1 million was invested in short-term money market funds and certificates of deposit.
Stock-Based Compensation.
Stock-based
compensation for equity awards is based on the grant date fair value of the equity investment and is recognized over the requisite
service period.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements.
In May 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU")
No. 2015-07 that eliminates the requirement to categorize investments within the fair value hierarchy if their fair value is measured
using the net asset value per share practical expedient in the FASB’s fair value measurement guidance. The amendments also
limit certain disclosures to investments for which the entity has elected to measure at fair value using the net asset value per
share practical expedient. The amendments were applied retrospectively by removing from the fair value hierarchy any investments
for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. Adoption of this guidance did not have
an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements.
In
May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASU 2014-09"). ASU 2014-09 outlines a
comprehensive model for companies to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers, and will apply to transactions
such as the sale of real estate. ASU 2014-09 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2018 as a result of the Company’s
election as an emerging growth company. The majority of our revenues related to rental income from leasing arrangements, which
is excluded from ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2014-09 will have on any non-lease components
and revenues generated from activities other than leasing.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases ("ASU 2016-02"). Under this new standard the large majority of operating leases are expected to remain classified
as operating leases, and lessors should continue to recognize lease income for those leases on a generally straight-line basis
over the lease term. ASU 2016-02 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2019 as a result of the Company’s election
as an emerging growth company, using a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after,
the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The
amendments in ASU 2016-02 do not significantly change the current lessor accounting model or the lessee accounting model for our
corporate office operating lease; however, we are currently evaluating the impact of this new standard.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,
Compensation — Stock Compensation; Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2016-09").
The FASB issued ASU 2016-09 to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including classification
of awards as either equity or liabilities, estimation of forfeitures and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09
is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2017 as a result of the Company’s election as an emerging growth company,
and early adoption is permitted. ASU 2016-09 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13,
Financial Instruments-Credit Losses ("ASU 2016-13"), which changes the impairment model for most financial assets and
certain other instruments. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments, companies
will be required to use a new forward-looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier recognition
of allowances for losses. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, companies will measure credit losses in
a manner similar to what they do today, except that the losses will be recognized as allowances rather than as reductions in the
amortized cost of the securities. Companies will have to disclose significantly more information, including information they use
to track credit quality by year of origination for most financing receivables. Companies will apply the standard’s provisions
as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance
is adopted. ASU 2016-13 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2020 as a result of the Company’s election as
an emerging growth company, with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the initial stage of evaluating the impact of this
new standard.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No.
2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments ("ASU 2016-15"),
which clarifies or provides guidance relating to eight specific cash flow classification issues. The standard should be applied
retrospectively for each period presented, as appropriate. This new standard is effective for years beginning after December 15,
2018 as a result of the Company’s election as an emerging growth company, with early adoption permitted. The impact of ASU
2016-15 will depend on future transactions, though the impact will only be related to the classification of those items on the
statement of cash flows and will not impact our cash flows or our consolidated results of operations.
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No.
2017-05, Other Income – Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the
Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets ("ASU 2017-05"), which
defines “in substance nonfinancial asset”, unifies guidance related to partial sales of nonfinancial assets, eliminates
rules specifically addressing sales of real estate, removes exceptions to the financial asset derecognition model, and clarifies
the accounting for contributions of nonfinancial assets to joint ventures. ASU 2017-05 is effective for years beginning after
December 15, 2018 as a result of the Company’s election as an emerging growth company. ASU 2017-05 is not expected to have
a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Concentration of Credit Risk
. Our
properties are located in the states of New York and Maryland. The ability of our tenants to honor the terms of their leases
are dependent upon the economic, regulatory, competition, natural and social factors affecting the community in which our tenants
operate.
As of September 30, 2017, the tenants at
our properties in New York and Maryland represented 67% and 33% of our total annualized base rent and supplemental base rent (for
our property in New York), respectively.
We have deposited cash with a financial
institution that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to $250,000. As of September
30, 2017, we had cash accounts in excess of FDIC insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts.
Reclassifications
. Certain prior
period amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect
on the reported results of operations.
The Company is authorized to issue up to
50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. Effective as of January 26, 2017, the Company amended its charter
to reclassify all shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock of the Company as a single class of common stock, par
value $0.001 per share.
The Company is authorized to issue up to
50,000,000 shares preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. No shares of preferred stock had been issued as of September 30,
2017. See Note 11 for further information.
The following table describes the dividends declared by the
Company during the period from June 15, 2016 (date of incorporation) through September 30, 2017:
Declaration
Date
|
|
Amount
Per
Share
|
|
|
Period Covered
|
|
Dividend Payable
Date
|
|
Dividend Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
May 30, 2017
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
April 1, 2017 to June 30, 2017
|
|
July 14, 2017
|
|
$
|
525
|
|
September 15, 2017
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
July 1, 2017 to September 30, 2017
|
|
October 13, 2017
|
|
$
|
525
|
|
|
6.
|
Net Income / (Loss) Per Share
|
Grants of restricted stock of the Company
in share-based payment transactions are considered participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, are considered in
computing basic earnings per share under the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation method for calculating
earnings per share when a company’s capital structure includes either two or more classes of common stock or common stock
and participating securities. Earnings per basic share under the two-class method is calculated based on dividends declared on
common shares and other participating securities (“distributed earnings”) and the rights of participating securities
in any undistributed earnings, which represents net income remaining after deduction of dividends accruing during the period. The
undistributed earnings are allocated to all outstanding common shares and participating securities based on the relative percentage
of each security to the total number of outstanding participating securities. Earnings per basic share represents the summation
of the distributed and undistributed earnings per share class divided by the total number of shares.
Through September 30, 2017, all of the
Company’s participating securities received dividends at an equal dividend rate per share. As a result, distributions to
participating securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 have been included in net income / (loss) attributable
to common stockholders to calculate net income / (loss) per basic and diluted share. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,
the Company incurred a net loss and therefore had distributions in excess of earnings. As such, 108,639 of unvested restricted
shares outstanding at September 30, 2017 have been excluded from the calculation of net income / (loss) per diluted share for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 as the impacts were anti-dilutive. Computations of net income / (loss) per basic
and diluted share (in thousands, except share data) were as follows:
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Net income / (loss)
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
$
|
(679
|
)
|
Distributions to participating securities
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Net income / (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
318
|
|
|
$
|
(711
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted
|
|
|
3,392,508
|
|
|
|
3,369,308
|
|
Net income/(loss) per share attributable to common stockholders - basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
On December 19, 2016, we purchased a 127,000
square foot industrial property located in New York from PharmaCann LLC (“PharmaCann”) for approximately $30.0 million
(plus approximately $75,000 in transaction costs) in a sale-leaseback transaction. PharmaCann, as tenant, is responsible under
the triple-net lease for paying all structural repairs, maintenance expenses, insurance and taxes related to the property. The
lease term is 15 years, with two options to extend the term of the lease for two additional five-year periods. The initial base
rent of the PharmaCann lease is approximately $319,580 per month, subject to annual increases at a rate based on the higher of
(i) 4% or (ii) 75% of the consumer price index, or CPI. The lease also provides that we will receive a property management fee
equal to 1.5% of the then-current base rent throughout the term, and supplemental base rent for the first five years of the term
of the lease at a rate of $105,477 per month.
On May 26, 2017, we purchased an industrial
property located in Maryland, which comprises approximately 72,000 square feet and was under development at the time of our acquisition.
The initial purchase price was $8.0 million (plus approximately $185,000 in transaction costs), with an additional $3.0 million
payable to the seller upon completion of certain development milestones. Concurrent with the closing of the purchase, we entered
into a triple-net lease agreement with Holistic Industries LLC ("Holistic") for use as a medical cannabis cultivation
facility. The initial term of the lease is 16 years, with three options to extend the term of the lease for three additional five
year periods. The initial annualized base rent, after a three month rent abatement period, is 15% of the sum of the initial purchase
price (excluding transaction costs), the additional seller reimbursement and the reimbursed tenant improvements as described below,
with 3.25% annual escalations for the initial term of the lease. Holistic is also responsible for paying the Company a 1.5% property
management fee of the then-existing base rent under the lease throughout the initial term. Holistic has an option to purchase the
property at a qualifying termination event or at the end of the initial lease term and subject to certain conditions, at the option
purchase price that is the greater of fair market value or a 7.5% capitalization rate derived from market rental rates for industrial
properties in the relevant competitive market.
On August 1, 2017, we paid the
additional $3.0 million to the seller upon the seller’s completion of the development milestones at the Maryland
property. On September 25, 2017, we amended the lease on our Maryland property with Holistic to, among other things, rescind
the $1.9 million rent reserve that we originally established for Holistic under the lease, and to reimburse up to $1.9
million of additional tenant improvements for Holistic, such that a total of $5.9 million is reimbursable by us to Holistic
for tenant improvements. In connection with that amendment and in lieu of draws on the previously established rent reserve,
Holistic paid to us $205,000 as a stipulated payment for the full base rent and property management fees for amounts from
August 26, 2017 (the expiration of the rent abatement period) through September 30, 2017. The personal guaranty by a
principal of Holistic, was also amended to guaranty the payment of the base rent and property management fee obligations due
under the lease from September 1, 2017 through May 31, 2018. On September 28, 2017, we approved and accrued for Holistic's
draw request for reimbursement of the full $5.9 million of tenant improvements and funded that amount on October 2, 2017. As
a result, our total investment in the Maryland property was approximately $16.9 million (excluding transaction costs), and,
effective as of October 1, 2017, Holistic's annualized base rent is approximately $2.6 million, or approximately $213,760 per
month, of which $187,500 is subject to annual escalations of 3.25% for the initial lease term.
|
8.
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
Fair value is defined as the price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the
measurement date. Accounting guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that
may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1—Observable inputs that reflect
quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2—Includes other inputs that
are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.
Level 3—Unobservable inputs that
are supported by little or no market activities, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
At September 30, 2017, cash equivalent
instruments consisted of $3.1 million in short-term money market funds that were measured using the net asset value per share that
have not been classified using the fair value hierarchy. The fund invests primarily in short-term U.S. Treasury and government
securities.
The carrying amounts of financial instruments
such as cash equivalents invested in certificates of deposit, receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
approximate their relative fair values due to the short-term maturities and market rates of interest of these instruments.
|
9.
|
Common Stock Incentive Plan
|
Our board of directors adopted our 2016
Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "2016 Plan") to enable us to motivate, attract and retain the services of directors, employees
and consultants considered essential to our long-term success. The 2016 Plan offers our directors, employees and consultants an
opportunity to own our stock or rights that will reflect our growth, development and financial success. Under the terms of the
2016 Plan, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock subject to options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock units and other awards, will be no more than 1,000,000 shares. The 2016 Plan has a term of ten years from the
date it was adopted by our board of directors.
A summary of the activity under the 2016
Plan and related information is included in the table below.
|
|
Unvested
Restricted
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average Date
Fair Value
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
66,508
|
|
|
$
|
17.47
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
109,056
|
|
|
|
18.68
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2017
|
|
|
175,564
|
|
|
|
18.55
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
5,955
|
|
|
|
17.64
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(42,508
|
)
|
|
|
18.55
|
|
Forfeited (1)
|
|
|
(30,372
|
)
|
|
|
18.49
|
|
Balance at each of June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2017
|
|
|
108,639
|
|
|
$
|
18.52
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes 16,792 shares that were forfeited to cover the employees’ tax withholding obligation upon vesting.
|
The remaining unrecognized compensation
cost of $1.5 million will be recognized over a weighted-average amortization period of approximately 2.3 years as of September
30, 2017.
|
10.
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
Office Lease
. As of September 30,
2017, we had approximately $252,000 outstanding in commitments related to our office lease, with approximately $16,000 expected
to be paid in 2017, approximately $75,000 to be paid in 2018, approximately $89,000 to be paid in 2019 and approximately $72,000
to be paid in 2020.
Acquisition and Real Estate Related
Commitments
. See Note 7.
Environmental Matters
. We follow
the policy of monitoring our properties, both targeted acquisition and existing properties, for the presence of hazardous or toxic
substances. While there can be no assurance that a material environmental liability does not exist, we are not currently
aware of any environmental liabilities that would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flow, or that we believe would require disclosure or the recording of a loss contingency.
Litigation
.
We
may, from time to time, be a party to legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not aware of
any pending or threatened litigation that, if resolved against us, would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
On October 2, 2017, we funded the $5.9
million tenant improvement allowance for the Maryland property in accordance with the amended lease agreement. See Note 7.
On October 19, 2017, we completed
an underwritten public offering of 600,000 shares of 9.00% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.001 par
value per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), at a price to the public of $25.00 per share, resulting in
gross proceeds of $15.0 million, excluding underwriting discounts and offering costs. Dividends on the Series A
Preferred Stock are payable quarterly in arrears on or about the 15
th
day of January, April, July and October of
each year, with the first dividend scheduled to be paid on January 16, 2018. The Series A Preferred Stock ranks senior
to our common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up.
The Series A Preferred Stock has no stated maturity date and is not subject to mandatory redemption or any sinking
fund. Generally, we are not permitted to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock prior to October 19, 2022, except in
limited circumstances relating to our ability to qualify as a REIT and in certain other circumstances related to a change of
control (as defined in the articles supplementary for the Series A Preferred Stock). We expect to use the net
proceeds to invest in specialized industrial real estate assets that support the regulated medical-use cannabis cultivation
and processing industry and for general corporate purposes.
On October 23, 2017, we acquired a property in New York for
approximately $3.4 million (excluding transaction costs) in a sale-leaseback transaction. Upon the closing, we entered into a triple-net
lease for the entire property with a subsidiary of Vireo Health, LLC, to operate a medical-use cannabis cultivation and processing
facility in compliance with applicable state and local law. The tenant responsible for paying all structural repairs, maintenance
expenses, insurance and taxes related to the property, and the lease provides that we will fund up to $1.0 million as reimbursement
for future tenant improvements at the property. The initial annual base rent for the property is $660,000, or 15% of the sum of
the purchase price and the tenant improvement allowance made available for the property, and subject to annual increases at a rate
of 3.5%. We also receive a property management fee under the lease equal to 1.5% of the then-current base rent throughout the term.
The initial lease term is 15 years, with two options to extend the term of the lease for two additional five-year periods.
On November 8, 2017 we acquired a property
in Minnesota for approximately $3.0 million (excluding transaction costs) in a sale-leaseback transaction. Upon the closing, we
entered into a triple-net lease for the entire property with a subsidiary of Vireo Health, LLC, to operate a medical-use cannabis
cultivation and processing facility in compliance with applicable state and local law. The tenant responsible for paying all structural
repairs, maintenance expenses, insurance and taxes related to the property, and the lease provides that we will fund up to $1.0
million as reimbursement for future tenant improvements at the property. The initial annual base rent for the property is $600,000,
or 15% of the sum of the purchase price and the tenant improvement allowance made available for the property, and subject to annual
increases at a rate of 3.5%. We also receive a property management fee under the lease equal to 1.5% of the then-current base
rent throughout the term. The initial lease term is 15 years, with two options to extend the term of the lease for two additional
five-year periods.
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read
in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. We make
statements in this report that are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. In particular, statements pertaining to our capital resources, portfolio performance and results of operations
contain forward-looking statements. Likewise, our statements regarding anticipated growth in our funds from operations and anticipated
market and regulatory conditions, our strategic direction, demographics, results of operations, plans and objectives are forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties, and you should not rely on them as predictions
of future events. Forward-looking statements depend on assumptions, data or methods which may be incorrect or imprecise, and we
may not be able to realize them. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described will happen as described (or that
they will happen at all). You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes,"
"expects," "may," "will," "should," "seeks," "approximately," "intends,"
"plans," "estimates" or "anticipates" or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words
or phrases. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. The following factors,
among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking
statements: our business and investment strategy; our projected operating results; actions and initiatives of the U.S. or state
governments and changes to government policies and the execution and impact of these actions, initiatives and policies, including
the fact that cannabis remains illegal under federal law; availability of suitable investment opportunities in the medical-use
cannabis industry; concentration of our portfolio of assets and limited number of tenants; our understanding of our competition
and our potential tenants' alternative financing sources; the estimated growth in the medical-use cannabis market; the demand for
medical-use cannabis cultivation and processing facilities; the expected medical-use or adult-use cannabis legalization in certain
states; shifts in public opinion regarding medical-use cannabis; the state of the U.S. economy generally or in specific geographic
areas; economic trends and economic recoveries; our ability to access equity or debt capital; financing rates for our target assets;
our expected leverage; changes in the values of our assets; our expected portfolio of assets; our expected investments; interest
rate mismatches between our target assets and our borrowings used to fund such investments; changes in interest rates and the market
value of our target assets; rates of default on leases for our target assets; the degree to which any interest rate or other hedging
strategies may or may not protect us from interest rate volatility; impact of and changes in governmental regulations, tax law
and rates, accounting guidance and similar matters; our ability to qualify as a REIT and, once qualified, maintain our qualification
as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes; our ability to maintain our exemption from registration under the Investment Company
Act of 1940; availability of qualified personnel; and market trends in our industry, interest rates, real estate values, the securities
markets or the general economy.
The risks included here are not exhaustive,
and additional factors could adversely affect our business and financial performance, including factors and risks included in other
sections of this report. In addition, we discussed a number of material risks in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
from June 15, 2016 (date of incorporation) through December 31, 2016, and in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017 under Part II, "Item 1A. Risk Factors." Those risks continue to be
relevant to our performance and financial condition. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment.
New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess
the impact of all such risk factors on our Company's business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may
cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement
made by us speaks only of the date on which we make it. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by law. Stockholders
and investors are cautioned not to unduly rely on such forward-looking statements when evaluating the information presented in
the Company's filings and reports.
The purpose of this Management's Discussion
and Analysis ("MD&A") is to provide an understanding of the Company's consolidated financial condition, results of
operations and cash. MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company's condensed consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes.
Overview
We were organized in the state of Maryland
on June 15, 2016. We are a self-advised Maryland corporation focused on the acquisition, ownership and management of specialized
industrial properties leased to experienced, state-licensed operators for their regulated medical-use cannabis facilities. We have
acquired and intend to continue to acquire our properties through sale-leaseback transactions and third-party purchases. We have
leased and expect to continue to lease our properties on a triple-net lease basis, where the tenant is responsible for all aspects
of and costs related to the property and its operation during the lease term, including structural repairs, maintenance, taxes
and insurance. We intend to elect and to operate our business so as to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax
purposes commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2017. We conduct all of our operations through our Operating Partnership.
Emerging Growth Company
We have elected to be an emerging growth
company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage
of specified reduced reporting requirements and is relieved of certain other significant requirements that are otherwise generally
applicable to public companies. As an emerging growth company, among other things:
|
·
|
we are exempt from the requirement to obtain an attestation and report
from our auditors on the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
|
|
·
|
we are permitted to provide less extensive disclosure about our executive
compensation arrangements;
|
|
·
|
we are not required to give our stockholders non-binding advisory
votes on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements; and
|
|
·
|
we have elected to use an extended transition period for complying
with new or revised accounting standards.
|
We may take advantage of the other provisions
for up to five years or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We will cease to be an emerging growth
company upon the earliest to occur of: (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1.07
billion, (ii) the date that we become a "large accelerated filer" as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates
exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, or (iii) the date on which
we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period.
Factors Impacting Our Operating Results
Our results of operations are affected
by a number of factors and depend on the rental revenue we receive from the properties that we acquire, the timing of lease expirations,
general market conditions, the regulatory environment in the medical-use cannabis industry, and the competitive environment for
real estate assets that support the regulated medical-use cannabis industry.
Rental Revenues
We receive income primarily from rental
revenue generated by the properties that we acquire. The amount of rental revenue depends upon a number of factors, including:
|
·
|
our ability to enter into leases with increasing or market value rents
for the properties that we acquire; and
|
|
·
|
rent collection, which primarily relates to each of our tenant's financial
condition and ability to make rent payments to us on time.
|
The properties that we acquire consist
of real estate assets that support the regulated medical-use cannabis industry. Changes in federal law and current favorable state
or local laws in the cannabis industry may impair our ability to renew or re-lease properties and the ability of our tenants to
fulfill their lease obligations and could materially and adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase rental rates for
our properties.
Conditions in Our Markets
Positive or negative changes in regulatory,
economic or other conditions, drought, and natural disasters in the markets where we acquire properties may affect our overall
financial performance.
Competitive Environment
We face competition from a diverse mix
of market participants, including but not limited to, other companies with similar business models, independent investors, hedge
funds, hard money lenders and other real estate investors, as well as potential tenants (cannabis operators themselves), all of
whom may compete with us in our efforts to acquire real estate zoned for cannabis cultivation and production operations. Competition
from others may diminish our opportunities to acquire a desired property on favorable terms or at all. In addition, this competition
may put pressure on us to reduce the rental rates below those that we expect to charge for the properties that we acquire, which
would adversely affect our financial results.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses include general
and administrative expenses, including personnel costs, stock-based compensation, and legal, accounting, and other expenses related
to corporate governance, public reporting and compliance with the various provisions of U.S. securities laws. As we have with the
leases at our two properties in New York and Maryland, and subsequently acquired properties, we generally expect to structure our
leases so that the tenant is responsible for taxes, maintenance, insurance, and structural repairs with respect to the premises
throughout the lease term. Increases or decreases in such operating expenses will impact our overall financial performance.
Our Qualification as a REIT
We have been organized and we intend to
elect, and to operate our business so as to qualify, to be taxed as a REIT, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, commencing with
our taxable year ending December 31, 2017. Shares of our common stock are subject to restrictions on ownership and transfer that
are intended, among other purposes, to assist us in qualifying and maintaining our qualification as a REIT. In order for us to
qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, the relevant sections of our charter provide
that, subject to certain exceptions, no person or entity may own, or be deemed to own, by virtue of the applicable constructive
ownership provisions of the Code, more than 9.8% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the aggregate
of our outstanding shares of stock or more than 9.8% (in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding
common stock or any class or series of our outstanding preferred stock.
Results of Operations
We were formed on June 15, 2016. We commenced
active real estate operations on December 19, 2016 with the acquisition of our first property in New York. As of September 30,
2017, we owned two properties: (1) a 127,000 square foot industrial property located in New York, which was purchased in December
2016 for approximately $30.0 million (excluding transaction costs), and (2) a 72,000 square foot industrial property located in
Maryland, which was under development when we purchased it in May 2017 for an initial purchase price of approximately $8.0 million
(excluding transaction costs), and for which we made an additional payment to the seller of $3.0 million in August 2017 upon completion
of certain development milestones. In October 2017, we funded an additional $5.9 million in tenant improvements at the Maryland
property, resulting in our total investment in the Maryland property being approximately $16.9 million (excluding closing costs).
As a result of the timing of our formation,
initial public offering and active real estate operations, comparative operating results with prior periods are not relevant to
a discussion of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. We expect revenue and expenses to increase in
future periods as we acquire additional properties.
Revenues
.
Rental
. Our rental revenues for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2017 related to rent generated from our properties in New York and Maryland. Rent under the lease for
the property we acquired in Maryland in May 2017 was subject to an initial rent abatement of three months, which expired on August
26, 2017.
Expenses
.
General and Administrative Expense
. General and administrative
expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was primarily related to compensation and occupancy costs for our
employees and corporate office. Compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 included approximately
$173,000 and $1.5 million, respectively, in non-cash stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation for equity awards is based
on the grant date fair value of restricted stock that was granted to certain of our employees and non-employee members of our board
of directors during 2016 and during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, which is recognized over the requisite service period.
Severance.
During the nine months ended September 30,
2017, we incurred $113,000 in severance expense related to the cessation of employment of one of our executive officers in June
2017.
Depreciation Expense.
Depreciation expense for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2017 related to depreciation of our properties.
Other Income.
Other income for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2017 related to interest earned on our cash and cash equivalents.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is a measure of our ability to
meet potential cash requirements. We expect to use significant cash to acquire our target properties, pay dividends to our stockholders,
fund our operations, and meet other general business needs.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Through September 30, 2017, we derived
most of our revenues from our property in New York, collecting rental income based on contractual arrangements with our tenant.
Rent under the lease for the property we acquired in Maryland in May 2017 was subject to an initial rent abatement of three months,
which expired on August 26, 2017. Revenues for our properties in New York and Maryland represent our primary source of liquidity
to fund our dividends, general and administrative expenses, property operating expenses and other expenses incurred related to
managing our existing portfolio and investing in additional properties. To the extent additional resources are needed, we expect
to fund our investment activity generally through equity or debt issuances either in the public or private markets. Where possible,
we also may issue limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership to acquire properties from existing owners seeking
a tax-deferred transaction.
We expect to meet our liquidity needs through
cash on hand, cash flows from operations and cash flows from sources discussed above. We believe that our liquidity and sources
of capital are adequate to satisfy our cash requirements. We cannot, however, be certain that these sources of funds will be available
at a time and upon terms acceptable to the Company in sufficient amounts to meet its liquidity needs. Our investment guidelines
also provide that our aggregate borrowings (secured and unsecured) will not exceed 50% of the cost of our tangible assets at the
time of any new borrowing, subject to our board of directors' discretion.
Operating Activities
Cash flows provided by operating activities for the nine
months ended September 30, 2017 was approximately $1.5 million. Cash flows provided by operating activities were generally
from contractual rent from our properties in New York and Maryland, offset by our general and administrative expense and other
costs of operating our properties.
Investing Activities
On May 26, 2017, we purchased one property
in Maryland for an initial purchase price of $8.0 million (plus $185,000 in transaction costs). On August 1, 2017, we paid the
additional $3.0 million to the seller upon the seller’s completion of the development milestones at the Maryland property.
On September 25, 2017, we amended the lease on our Maryland property with Holistic to, among other things, rescind the $1.9 million
rent reserve that we originally established for Holistic under the lease, and to reimburse up to $1.9 million of additional tenant
improvements for Holistic, such that a total of $5.9 million is reimbursable by us to Holistic for tenant improvements. In addition,
on September 28, 2017, we approved Holistic's draw request for reimbursement of the full $5.9 million of tenant improvements and
subsequent to September 30, 2017, funded that amount on October 2, 2017. As a result, our total investment in the Maryland property
was approximately $16.9 million (excluding transaction costs).
Subsequent to September 30, 2017 on October
23, 2017, we acquired a property in New York for approximately $3.4 million (excluding transaction costs) in a sale-leaseback transaction.
Upon the closing, we entered into a triple-net lease for the entire property with a subsidiary of Vireo Health, LLC, to operate
a medical-use cannabis cultivation and processing facility in compliance with applicable state and local law. The tenant responsible
for paying all structural repairs, maintenance expenses, insurance and taxes related to the property, and the lease provides that
we will fund up to $1.0 million as reimbursement for future tenant improvements at the property. The initial annual base rent for
the property is $660,000, or 15% of the sum of the purchase price and the tenant improvement allowance made available for the property,
and subject to annual increases at a rate of 3.5%. We also receive a property management fee under the lease equal to 1.5% of the
then-current base rent throughout the term. The initial lease term is 15 years, with two options to extend the term of the lease
for two additional five-year periods.
Also subsequent to September 30, 2017,
on November 8, 2017 we acquired a property in Minnesota for approximately $3.0 million (excluding transaction costs) in a sale-leaseback
transaction. Upon the closing, we entered into a triple-net lease for the entire property with a subsidiary of Vireo Health, LLC,
to operate a medical-use cannabis cultivation and processing facility in compliance with applicable state and local law. The tenant
responsible for paying all structural repairs, maintenance expenses, insurance and taxes related to the property, and the lease
provides that we will fund up to $1.0 million as reimbursement for future tenant improvements at the property. The initial annual
base rent for the property is $600,000, or 15% of the sum of the purchase price and the tenant improvement allowance made available
for the property, and subject to annual increases at a rate of 3.5%. We also receive a property management fee under the lease
equal to 1.5% of the then-current base rent throughout the term. The initial lease term is 15 years, with two options to extend
the term of the lease for two additional five-year periods.
Financing Activities
During the nine months ended September
30, 2017, we paid approximately $276,000 of initial stock offering costs, approximately $298,000 related to net share settlement
of equity awards to pay the required withholding taxes upon vesting of restricted stock for certain employees, and approximately
$525,000 in dividends to common stockholders.
Subsequent to September 30, 2017,
on October 19, 2017, we completed an underwritten public offering of 600,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at a price
to the public of $25.00 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of $15.0 million, excluding underwriting discounts
and offering costs. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are payable quarterly in arrears on or about the
15
th
day of January, April, July and October of each year, with the first dividend scheduled to be paid on January
16, 2018. The Series A Preferred Stock ranks senior to our common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights
upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up. The Series A Preferred Stock has no stated maturity date and
is not subject to mandatory redemption or any sinking fund. Generally, we are not permitted to redeem the
Series A Preferred Stock prior to October 19, 2022, except in limited circumstances relating to our ability to qualify
as a REIT and in certain other circumstances related to a change of control (as defined in the articles supplementary for the
Series A Preferred Stock). We expect to use the net proceeds to invest in specialized industrial real estate
assets that support the regulated medical-use cannabis cultivation and processing industry and for general corporate
purposes.
Dividends
The Company is required to pay dividends to its stockholders
at least equal to 90% of its taxable income in order to qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT. We are a newly formed
company, and paid our first dividend of $0.15 per share on July 14, 2017 to stockholders of record on June 30, 2017. We paid our
second dividend of $0.15 per share on October 13, 2017 to stockholders of record on September 29, 2017, equal to an annual dividend
rate of $0.60 per share. The actual dividend payable in the future will be determined by our board of directors based upon the
circumstances at the time of declaration and, as a result, the actual dividend payable in the future may vary from the current
rate. The decision to declare and pay dividends on shares of our common stock in the future, as well as the timing, amount and
composition of any such future dividends, will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors in light of conditions then
existing, including our ability to generate cash flows, earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, debt maturities, the
availability of debt and equity capital, applicable REIT and legal restrictions and general overall economic conditions and other
factors.
Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations
Funds from operations (“FFO”)
and FFO per share are operating performance measures adopted by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc.
(“NAREIT”). NAREIT defines FFO as the most commonly accepted and reported measure of a REIT’s operating performance
equal to “net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus
depreciation and amortization related to real estate properties, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint
ventures.”
Management believes that net income (loss),
as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measurement. However, management believes FFO and FFO per share to be supplemental
measures of a REIT’s performance because they provide an understanding of the operating performance of our properties without
giving effect to certain significant non-cash items, primarily depreciation expense. Historical cost accounting for real estate
assets in accordance with GAAP assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. However, real estate
values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions. We believe that by excluding the effect of depreciation,
FFO and FFO per share can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods. We report FFO and FFO per share because
these measures are observed by management to also be the predominant measures used by the REIT industry and by industry analysts
to evaluate REITs and because FFO per share is consistently reported, discussed, and compared by research analysts in their notes
and publications about REITs. For these reasons, management has deemed it appropriate to disclose and discuss FFO and FFO per share.
Management believes that AFFO and AFFO
per share are also appropriate supplemental measures of a REIT’s operating performance. We calculate AFFO by adding to FFO
certain non-cash and non-recurring expenses, consisting of non-cash stock-based compensation expense and severance expense.
Our computation of FFO and AFFO may differ
from the methodology for calculating FFO and AFFO utilized by other equity REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such
REITs. Further, FFO and AFFO do not represent cash flow available for management's discretionary use. FFO and AFFO should not be
considered as an alternative to net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our financial performance
or to cash flow from operating activities (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our liquidity, nor is it indicative
of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or make distributions. FFO and AFFO should be
considered only as supplements to net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP as measures of operations.
The table below is a reconciliation of
net income / (loss) to FFO and AFFO for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 (In thousands, except share and per
share amounts).
|
|
For the Three
Months Ended
September 30,
2017
|
|
|
For the Nine
Months Ended
September 30,
2017
|
|
Net income / (loss)
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
$
|
(679
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
FFO
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
AFFO
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
1,535
|
|
FFO per common share – basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
AFFO per common share – basic
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
AFFO per common share – diluted
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding-basic
|
|
|
3,392,508
|
|
|
|
3,369,308
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding-diluted
|
|
|
3,501,147
|
|
|
|
3,509,166
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies
Our condensed consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ materially
from those estimates and assumptions. Set forth below is a summary of our accounting policies that we believe are critical to the
preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Acquisition of Rental Property, Depreciation and Impairment
In order to prepare our condensed consolidated
financial statements according to the rules and guidelines set forth by GAAP, many subjective judgments must be made with regard
to critical accounting policies. One of these judgments is our estimate for useful lives in determining depreciation expense for
our properties. Depreciation of our buildings is computed using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of 35 years,
which we believe is an appropriate estimate of useful life. Depreciation of tenant improvements at our buildings is computed using
the straight-line method over the shorter of its estimated useful life or the terms of the related leases. If we use a shorter
or longer estimated useful life, it could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations.
Management must make significant
assumptions in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Upon acquisition of a property, we allocate
the purchase price based upon the relative fair values of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Acquisition costs are capitalized
as incurred. The acquisitions of our property in New York and our property in Maryland were each recorded as an asset acquisition.
Another significant judgment must be made
as to if, and when, impairment losses should be taken on our properties when events or a change in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. A provision is made for impairment if estimated future operating cash
flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) plus estimated disposition proceeds (undiscounted) are less than the current
book value of the property. Key inputs that we utilize in this analysis include projected rental rates, estimated holding periods,
capital expenditures, and property sales capitalization rates. If a property is held for sale, it is carried at the lower of carrying
cost or estimated fair value, less estimated cost to sell. The carrying value of our real estate is anticipated to be the largest
component of our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Our strategy of primarily holding properties, long-term, directly decreases
the likelihood of their carrying values not being recoverable, thus requiring the recognition of an impairment. However, if our
strategy, or one or more of the above assumptions were to change in the future, an impairment may need to be recognized. If events
should occur that require us to reduce the carrying value of our real estate by recording provisions for impairment, they could
have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations.
Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable
Our leases and future tenant leases are
generally expected to be triple-net leases, an arrangement under which the tenant is responsible for all aspects of and costs related
to the property and its operation during the lease term, including structural repairs, maintenance, taxes and insurance. We anticipate
that all leases will be accounted for as operating leases. Under this method, leases that have fixed and determinable rent increases
are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, unless the collectability of minimum lease payments is not reasonably
predictable. Contractually obligated reimbursements from tenants for recoverable real estate taxes and operating expenses will
be included in tenant reimbursements in the period when such costs are incurred.
We recognize an allowance for doubtful
accounts relating to accounts receivable for amounts deemed uncollectible. We consider tenant specific issues, such as financial
stability and ability to pay, when determining collectability of accounts receivable and appropriate allowances to record. We record
revenue for our properties on a cash basis due to the uncertainty of collectability of lease payments from the tenants due to their
lack of operating history.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation for equity awards
is based on the grant date fair value of the equity instrument and is recognized over the requisite service period.
Income Taxes
We have been organized and we intend to
elect, and to operate our business so as to qualify, to be taxed as a REIT, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, commencing with
our taxable year ending December 31, 2017. Under the REIT operating structure, we are permitted to deduct dividends paid to our
stockholders in determining our taxable income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As long as our dividends equal or exceed our
taxable net income, we generally will not be required to pay U.S. federal income tax on such income.
Adoption of New or Revised Accounting Standards
As an "emerging growth company"
under the JOBS Act, we can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an "emerging
growth company" can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private
companies. An "emerging growth company" may opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised
accounting standards. A decision to opt out, however, is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition
period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies,
we can adopt the standard for the private company. This may make comparison of our financial statements with a public company that
either is not an "emerging growth company" or is an "emerging growth company" that has opted out of using the
extended transition period difficult or impossible as different or revised accounting standards may be used.
Impact of Real Estate and Credit Markets
In the commercial real estate market, property
prices generally continue to fluctuate. Likewise, during certain periods, the U.S. credit markets have experienced significant
price volatility, dislocations, and liquidity disruptions, which may impact our access to and cost of capital. We continually monitor
the commercial real estate and U.S. credit markets carefully and, if required, will make decisions to adjust our business strategy
accordingly.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no unconsolidated investments or
any other off-balance sheet arrangements.
Interest Rate Risk
We have not issued any debt and have no
debt outstanding, so we are not exposed to interest rate changes. At this time, we have no plans to issue debt instruments. It
is possible that a property we acquire in the future would be subject to a mortgage, which we may assume.
Impact of Inflation
We intend to enter into leases that generally
provide for limited increases in rent as a result of increases in the CPI (typically subject to ceilings) or fixed increases. We
expect these lease provisions to result in rent increases over time. During times when inflation is greater than increases in rent,
as provided for in the leases, rent increases may not keep up with the rate of inflation.
Seasonality
We do not expect our business to be subject
to material seasonal fluctuations.