The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)
1. Organization and Business
ORBCOMM Inc. (“ORBCOMM” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, is a global provider of Internet of Things (“IoT”) solutions,
including network connectivity, devices, device management and web reporting applications. The Company’s IoT products and services are designed to track, monitor, control and enhance security for a variety of assets, such as trailers, trucks, rail cars, sea containers, generators, fluid tanks, marine vessels, diesel or electric powered generators (“gensets”), oil and gas wells, pipeline monitoring equipment, irrigation control systems and utility meters, in industries for transportation & supply chain, heavy equipment, fixed asset monitoring, maritime and government.
Additionally, the Company provides satellite Automatic Identification Service (“AIS”) data services to assist in vessel navigation and to improve maritime safety for government and commercial customers worldwide.
The Company provides these services
using multiple network platforms, including
a constellation of low-Earth orbit (“LEO”) satellites and accompanying ground infrastructure, as well as terrestrial-based cellular communication services obtained through reseller agreements with major cellular (Tier One) wireless providers. The Company also offers customer solutions utilizing additional satellite network service options that the Company obtains through service agreements entered into with multiple mobile satellite providers.
The Company’s satellite-based customer solution offerings use small, low power, mobile satellite subscriber communicators for remote asset connectivity, and the Company’s terrestrial-based solutions utilize cellular data modems with subscriber identity modules (“SIMS”). The Company also resells service using the two-way Inmarsat satellite network to provide higher bandwidth, low-latency satellite products and services, leveraging the Company’s IsatDataPro (“IDP”) technology. The Company’s customer solutions provide access to data gathered over these systems via connections to other public or private networks, including the Internet. The Company provides what it believes is the most versatile, leading-edge IoT solutions in the Company’s markets to enable its customers to run their business more efficiently.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Principles
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The accompanying financial statements are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (including normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, and investments in variable interest entities in which the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The portions of majority-owned subsidiaries that the Company does not own are reflected as noncontrolling interests in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Investments
Investments in entities over which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not have a controlling interest are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The Company considers several factors in determining whether it has the ability to exercise significant influence with respect to investments, including, but not limited to, direct and indirect ownership level in the voting securities, active participation on the board of directors, approval of operating and budgeting decisions and other participatory and protective rights. Under the equity method, the Company’s proportionate share of the net income or loss of such investee is reflected in the Company’s condensed consolidated results of operations. When the Company does not exercise significant influence over the investee, the investment is accounted for under the cost method.
Although the Company owns interests in companies that it accounts for pursuant to the equity method, the investments in those entities had no carrying value as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The Company has no guarantees or other funding obligations to those entities. The Company had no equity in or losses of those investees for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.
8
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
Acquisition-related and Integration Costs
Acquisition-related and integration costs are expensed as incurred and are presented separately on the condensed consolidated statement of operations. These costs may include professional services expenses and identifiable integration costs directly relating to acquisitions.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company has no financial assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. However, if certain triggering events occur the Company is required to evaluate its non-financial assets for impairment and any resulting asset impairment would require that a non-financial asset be recorded at the fair value. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurement Disclosure,” prioritizes inputs used in measuring fair value into a hierarchy of three levels: Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets; Level 2 – inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3 – unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing.
The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated their fair value due to the short-term nature of these items. As of September 30, 2017, the carrying amount and the fair value of the Company’s Senior Secured Notes (described in “Note 11 – Notes Payable”) were $250,000 and $268,125, respectively. The fair values of the Senior Secured Notes are based on observable relevant market information. Fluctuations between the carrying amounts and the fair values of the Senior Secured Notes for the period presented are associated with changes in market interest rates. The Company may redeem all or part of the Senior Secured Notes at any time or from time to time at its option at specified redemption prices that would include “make-whole” premiums. Refer to “Note 11 – Notes Payable” for more information. The fair value of the $1,343 book value Note payable-related party is de minimus.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company’s customers are primarily commercial organizations. Accounts receivable are generally unsecured.
Accounts receivable are due in accordance with payment terms included in contracts negotiated with customers. Amounts due from customers are stated net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company determines its allowance for doubtful accounts by considering a number of factors, including the length of time accounts are past due, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligations to the Company and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes-off accounts receivable when they are deemed uncollectible.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2017, JB Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (“JB Hunt Transport”) comprised 14.9% of the Company’s consolidated total revenues. There were no customers with revenues greater than 10% of the Company’s consolidated total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. There were no customers with revenues greater than 10% of the Company’s consolidated total revenues for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016.
Two customers, JB Hunt Transport and AT&T Solutions, Inc. comprised 11.5% and 10.2%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated accounts receivable as of September 30, 2017. One customer, Caterpillar, Inc., comprised 10.5% of the Company’s consolidated accounts receivable as of December 31, 2016.
As of September 30, 2017, the Company did not maintain in-orbit insurance coverage for its ORBCOMM Generation 1 (“OG1”) or ORBCOMM Generation 2 (“OG2”) satellites to address the risk of potential systemic anomalies, failures or catastrophic events affecting its satellite constellation.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, determined on a first-in, first-out basis. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, inventory consisted primarily of finished goods and purchased parts to be utilized by its contract manufacturer totaling $29,863 and $14,531, respectively, and $6,323 and $8,686, respectively, of raw materials, net of inventory obsolescence. The Company reviews inventory quantities on hand and evaluates the realizability of inventories and adjusts the carrying value as necessary based on forecasted product demand. A provision, recorded in cost of product sales on the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations, is made for potential losses on slow moving and obsolete inventories when identified.
9
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
Valuation of Long-lived
Assets
Property and equipment and other long-lived assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company measures recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to the projected cash flows the assets are expected to generate. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that carrying value exceeds fair value.
The Company’s satellite constellation and related assets are evaluated as a single asset group whenever facts or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If indicators of impairment are identified, recoverability of long-lived assets is measured by comparing their carrying amount to the projected cash flows the assets are expected to generate.
Determining whether an impairment has occurred typically requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including the allocation of cash flows to assets or asset groups and, if required, an estimate of fair value for those assets or asset groups.
If a satellite were to fail while in-orbit, the resulting loss would be charged to expense in the period it is determined that the satellite is not recoverable. An impairment loss of $31,224 related to three of the Company’s OG2 satellites was recorded for the quarter ended September 30, 2017.
Refer to “Note 6 – Satellite Network and Other Equipment” for more information.
Warranty Costs
The Company accrues for one-year warranty coverage on product sales estimated at the time of sale based on historical costs to repair or replace products for customers compared to historical product revenues. The warranty accrual is included in accrued liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Refer to “Note 8 – Accrued Liabilities” for more information.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 for all entities by one year. As a result, the new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. Early adoption prior to the original effective date is not permitted. The two permitted transition methods under the new standard are the full retrospective method, in which case the standard would be applied to each prior reporting period presented, or the modified retrospective method, in which case the cumulative effect of applying the standard would be recognized at the date of initial application. The Company has substantially completed its review of its contract portfolio and is currently finalizing its evaluation of the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company will complete this process during the fourth quarter of 2017 and anticipates a modified retrospective application upon adoption in the first quarter of 2018.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”), which is effective for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. ASU 2016-02 requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases, along with additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, if any.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 “Statements of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”) and is effective for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. ASU 2016-15 is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard, which is required to be applied using the retrospective transition method, is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statement of cash flows.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18 “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash” (“ASU 2016-18”) and is effective for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. ASU 2016-18 requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Entities will also be required to reconcile such total to amounts on the balance sheet and disclose the nature of the restrictions. The guidance requires application using a retrospective transition method. The Company intends to adopt this standard on January 1, 2018 and expects the retrospective application to impact its classification of certain restricted cash activity in its statement
10
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
of cash flows in future interim filings. The Company
is evaluating
other potential
effects, if any, that the a
doption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04 “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU 2017-04”) and is effective beginning with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. ASU 2017-04 removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The adoption of this standard, which will be applied prospectively, is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
3. Acquisitions
inthinc Technology Solutions Inc.
On June 9, 2017, pursuant to the asset purchase agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) entered into by the Company and, inthinc, Inc., inthinc Technology Solutions, Inc., tiwi, Inc., inthinc Telematics, Inc., DriveAware, Inc., inthinc Chile, SP, and inthinc Investors, L.P. (collectively, “inthinc”), the Company completed the acquisition of inthinc for an aggregate consideration of (i) $34,236 in cash, subject to net working capital adjustments, on a debt free, cash free basis; (ii) issuance of 76,796 shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $9.95 per share, which reflected a 20 day trading average price of the Company’s stock ending June 8, 2017; and (iii) additional contingent consideration of up to $25,000 subject to certain operational milestones, payable in stock or a combination of cash and stock at the Company’s election (the “inthinc Acquisition”). As the inthinc Acquisition was effective on June 9, 2017, the results of operations of inthinc were included in the condensed consolidated financial statements beginning June 9, 2017.
Preliminary Estimated Purchase Price Allocation
The inthinc Acquisition has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. This method requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of the preliminary purchase price over the preliminary net assets was recorded as goodwill. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price was based upon a preliminary valuation and the estimates and assumptions are subject to change during the one year measurement period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded a measurement period adjustment related to the intangible asset valuation and other working capital accounts, which resulted in a decrease in goodwill of $4,403. The total consideration for the inthinc Acquisition was $44,835, of which $9,835 represents acquisition date contingent consideration at fair value, in a debt free, cash free transaction. The preliminary estimated purchase price allocation for the acquisition is as follows:
|
|
Amount
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
1,833
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
906
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
112
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
258
|
|
Lease receivable
|
|
|
5,812
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
24,300
|
|
Total identifiable assets acquired
|
|
|
33,221
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
5,214
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
506
|
|
Other current and non-current liabilities
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
7,347
|
|
Net identifiable assets acquired
|
|
|
25,874
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
18,961
|
|
Total preliminary purchase price
|
|
$
|
44,835
|
|
Intangible Assets
The estimated fair value of the technology intangible assets was determined using the “relief from royalty method” under the income approach, which is a valuation technique that provides an estimate of the fair value of an asset based on the costs savings that are
11
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
available through ownership of the asset by the avoidance of paying royalties to license the use of the assets from another owner. The estimated fair value of the customer lists was determined using the “excess earnings method” under the income ap
proach, which represents the total income to be generated by the asset. Some of the more significant assumptions inherent in the development of those asset valuations include the projected revenue associated with the asset, the appropriate discount rate to
select in order to measure the risk inherent in each future cash flow stream, the assessment of each asset’s life cycle, as well as other factors. The discount rate used to arrive at the present value at the acquisition date of the customer lists and tech
nology was 12%. The remaining useful lives of the technology were based on historical product development cycles, the projected rate of technology migration and a market participant’s use of these intangible assets and the pattern of projected economic ben
efit of this intangible asset. The remaining useful lives of customer lists were based on the customer attrition and the projected economic benefit of these customers.
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(years)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
18,300
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,300
|
|
Goodwill
The inthinc Acquisition allows the Company to offer fleet management and driver safety solutions to more than 100 enterprises and industrial companies around the world, who operate large commercial vehicle fleets. These factors contributed to a preliminary estimated purchase price resulting in the recognition of goodwill.
The goodwill attributable to the inthinc Acquisition is deductible for tax purposes.
Indemnification Asset
In connection with the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into an Escrow Agreement with inthinc and an escrow agent (the “Escrow Agreement”). Under the terms of this Escrow Agreement, $500 was placed in an escrow account through September 9, 2019 (the “Escrow Amount”) to fund any indemnification obligations to the Company under the Asset Purchase Agreement. Under the terms of the Escrow Agreement, as of any release date for any portion of the Escrow Amount, the value of any then submitted and unresolved indemnification claims shall be retained in the Escrow Amount until such time as the applicable claims are resolved.
Acquired Customer Product Liability
As a result of the inthinc Acquisition, the Company acquired customer product obligations on inthinc’s product sales. The Company’s analysis of the customer product liabilities are estimated based on the historical costs of inthinc to replace or fix products for customers, as well as installations costs associated with these obligations. As the Company continues to gather additional information, these accrual estimates may differ from actual results and adjustments to the estimated customer product liability would be required. The Company continues to evaluate customer product liabilities relating to the inthinc Acquisition throughout the measurement period. If the Company determines that adjustments to these amounts are required during the remainder of the measurement period, such amounts will be recorded as an adjustment to goodwill. On June 9, 2017, the Company had estimated additional product liabilities obligations of $1,333 relating to customer product obligations it was investigating associated with the inthinc Acquisition.
12
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
Continge
nt Consideration
Additional consideration is conditionally due to the inthinc sellers upon achievement of certain financial milestones through June 2019. The fair value measurement of the contingent consideration obligation is determined using Level 3 unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity based on the Company’s own assumptions. The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration was determined based on the Company’s preliminary estimates using the probability-weighted discounted cash flow approach. As of September 30, 2017, the Company recorded $9,040 in other non-current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet in connection with the contingent consideration. The first financial milestone for this additional consideration is not expected to be met, and therefore, the Company recorded a reduction of the contingent liability of $795 in selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017.
Skygistics Ltd.
On May 26, 2016, pursuant to an asset purchase agreement entered into on April 11, 2016 among a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, Skygistics Propriety Limited and Satconnect Propriety Limited (the “Skygistics Sellers”), the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Skygistics (PTY) Ltd. (“Skygistics”) for a purchase price of $3,835 and additional contingent consideration of up to $954, subject to certain operational milestones (the “Skygistics Acquisition”). The Skygistics Acquisition provides a broad range of satellite and cellular connectivity options as well as telematics solutions centered on the management of remote and mobile assets to more than 250 telematics and enterprise customers.
Contingent Consideration
Additional consideration was conditionally due to the Skygistics Sellers upon achievement of certain financial milestones through April 2017. The fair value measurement of the contingent consideration obligation was determined using Level 3 unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity based on the Company’s own assumptions. The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration was determined based on the Company’s preliminary estimates using the probability-weighted discounted cash flow approach. The financial milestone for this additional consideration has not been met, and therefore, the Company recorded a reduction of the contingent liability of $519 in SG&A expenses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations in the three months ended March 31, 2017.
Euroscan Holding B.V.
On March 11, 2014, pursuant to the share purchase agreement entered into by the Company and MWL Management B.V., R.Q. Management B.V., WBB GmbH, ING Corporate Investments Participaties B.V. and Euroscan Holding B.V., as sellers, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the outstanding equity of Euroscan Holding B.V., including, indirectly, its wholly-owned subsidiaries Euroscan B.V., Euroscan GmbH Vertrieb Technischer Geräte, Euroscan Technology Ltd. and Ameriscan, Inc. (collectively, the “Euroscan Group” or “Euroscan”) for an aggregate consideration of (i) $29,163, inclusive of net working capital adjustments and net cash (on a debt free, cash free basis); (ii) issuance of 291,230 shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $7.70 per share, which reflected the Company’s closing price on the acquisition date; and (iii) additional contingent consideration of up to $6,547 (the “Euroscan Acquisition”). The Euroscan Acquisition allowed the Company to complement its North American operations in IoT by adding a significant distribution channel in Europe and other key geographies where Euroscan has market share.
Contingent Consideration
Additional consideration was conditionally due to MWL Management B.V. and R.Q. Management B.V. upon achievement of financial and operational milestones through March 2017. The fair value measurement of the contingent consideration obligation was determined using Level 3 unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity based on our own assumptions. The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration was determined based on the Company’s preliminary estimates using the probability-weighted discounted cash flow approach. As of December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $655 in accrued expenses on the condensed consolidated balance sheet in connection with the contingent consideration. Changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration obligations are recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.
A total of $694 was paid to MWL Management B.V. and R.Q. Management B.V. in cash and common stock of the Company during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 upon achievement of one milestone
.
13
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
4. Stock-based Compensation
On April 20, 2016, the stockholders of the Company approved the ORBCOMM Inc. 2016 Long-Term Incentives Plan (the “2016 LTIP”). The 2016 LTIP replaces the Company’s 2006 Long-Term Incentives Plan (the “2006 LTIP”). The number of shares authorized for delivery under the 2016 LTIP is 6,949,400 shares, including 1,949,400 shares that remained available under the 2006 LTIP as of February 17, 2016, plus any shares previously subject to awards under the 2006 LTIP that are cancelled, forfeited or lapse unexercised since that date. As of September 30, 2017, there were 5,136,686 shares available for grant under the 2016 LTIP.
Total stock-based compensation recorded by the Company for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $1,345 and $1,219, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $4,314 and $3,824, respectively. Total capitalized stock-based compensation for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $114 and $88, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $357 and $219, respectively.
The following table summarizes the components of stock-based compensation expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
Cost of product sales
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
3,606
|
|
|
|
3,062
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,345
|
|
|
$
|
1,219
|
|
|
$
|
4,314
|
|
|
$
|
3,824
|
|
As of September 30, 2017, the Company had unrecognized compensation costs for stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) totaling $4,041.
Time-Based Stock Appreciation Rights
A summary of the Company’s time-based SARs for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Term (years)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2017
|
|
|
3,789,394
|
|
|
$
|
5.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
8.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,214,000
|
)
|
|
|
4.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2017
|
|
|
2,665,394
|
|
|
$
|
5.34
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
12,888
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2017
|
|
|
2,561,694
|
|
|
$
|
5.26
|
|
|
|
4.73
|
|
|
$
|
12,903
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2017
|
|
|
2,665,394
|
|
|
$
|
5.34
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
12,888
|
|
For the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $133 and $48, respectively, relating to these SARs. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $428 and $213, respectively, relating to these SARs. As of September 30, 2017, $466 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to these SARs is expected to be recognized through December 2019.
The intrinsic value of the time-based SARs exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $7,515.
14
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
Performance-Based Stock Appreciation Rights
A summary of the Company’s performance-based SARs for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Term (years)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2017
|
|
|
589,424
|
|
|
$
|
6.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(28,640
|
)
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(44,611
|
)
|
|
|
11.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2017
|
|
|
516,173
|
|
|
$
|
5.78
|
|
|
|
3.95
|
|
|
$
|
3,588
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2017
|
|
|
516,173
|
|
|
$
|
5.78
|
|
|
|
3.95
|
|
|
$
|
3,588
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2017
|
|
|
516,173
|
|
|
$
|
5.78
|
|
|
|
3.95
|
|
|
$
|
3,588
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $2 relating to these SARs, respectively. As of September 30, 2017, there is no unrecognized compensation cost related to these SARs expected to be recognized.
The intrinsic value of the performance-based SARs exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $215.
The fair value of each time-based and performance-based SAR award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the assumptions described below. For the periods indicated, the expected volatility was based on the Company’s historical volatility over the expected terms of the SAR awards. Estimated forfeitures were based on voluntary and involuntary termination behavior, as well as analysis of actual forfeitures. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of the grant over the expected term of the SAR grants. The Company did not grant time-based or performance-based SARs during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
2.10%
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
6.0
|
Estimated volatility factor
|
|
59.85%
|
Expected dividends
|
|
None
|
Time-based Restricted Stock Units
A summary of the Company’s time-based RSUs for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is as follows:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2017
|
|
|
691,952
|
|
|
$
|
8.28
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
184,370
|
|
|
|
10.05
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(370,331
|
)
|
|
|
7.15
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(4,559
|
)
|
|
|
8.78
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2017
|
|
|
501,432
|
|
|
$
|
9.76
|
|
15
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
For the quarters ended
September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $7
17
and $605, respectively, related to these RSUs. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $2,0
96
and $1,755, respectively, related to these RSUs. As of September 30, 2017, $2,897 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to these RSUs is expected to be recognized through September 2020.
Performance-based Restricted Stock Units
A summary of the Company’s performance-based RSUs for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is as follows:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2017
|
|
|
473,608
|
|
|
$
|
7.80
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(214,835
|
)
|
|
|
6.78
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(40,174
|
)
|
|
|
7.01
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2017
|
|
|
218,599
|
|
|
$
|
7.80
|
|
For the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $274 and $301, respectively, related to these RSUs. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $1,016 and $1,180, respectively, related to these RSUs. As of September 30, 2017, $678 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to these RSUs is expected to be recognized through March 2018.
The fair values of the time-based and performance-based RSU awards are based upon the closing stock price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.
Performance Units
The Company grants market performance units (“MPUs”) to its senior executives based on stock price performance over a three-year period measured on December 31 of each year in the performance period. The MPUs will vest at the end of each year in the performance period only if the Company satisfies the stock price performance targets and continued employment by the senior executives through the dates the Compensation Committee has determined that the targets have been achieved. The value of the MPUs that will be earned each year ranges up to 15% of each of the senior executives’ annual base salaries depending on the Company’s stock price performance target for that year. The value of the MPUs can be paid in either cash or common stock or a combination of cash and stock at the Company’s option. The MPUs are classified as a liability and are revalued at the end of each reporting period based on the fair value of the awards over a three-year period.
As the MPUs contain both a performance and service condition, the MPUs have been treated as a series of three separate awards, or tranches, for purposes of recognizing stock-based compensation expense. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on a tranche-by-tranche basis over the requisite service period for that specific tranche. The Company estimated the fair value of the MPUs using a Monte Carlo Simulation Model that used the following assumptions:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
1.06% to 1.51%
|
|
0.29% to 0.80%
|
Estimated volatility factor
|
|
23.0% to 31.0%
|
|
29.0% to 34.0%
|
Expected dividends
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
For the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $175 and $229, respectively, relating to these MPUs. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $639 and $626, respectively, relating to these MPUs.
As of September 30, 2017, the Company recorded $666 and $223 in accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities, respectively, in its condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $715 and $260 in accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities, respectively, in its condensed consolidated balance sheet.
16
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company’s Board of Directors adopted the ORBCOMM Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) on February 16, 2016 and the Company’s shareholders approved the ESPP on April 20, 2016. Under the terms of the ESPP, 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock are available for issuance, and eligible employees may have up to 10% of their gross pay deducted from their payroll up to a maximum of $25 per year to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at a discount of up to 15% of the common stock’s fair market value, subject to certain conditions and limitations. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $46 and $135 relating to the ESPP. Purchases of the Company’s Common Stock under the ESPP were 75,888 shares at a price of $6.97 during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
5. Net Loss Attributable to ORBCOMM Inc. Common Stockholders
The Company accounts for earnings per share (“EPS”) in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share” (“ASC 260”) and related guidance, which requires two calculations of EPS to be disclosed: basic and diluted. The numerator in calculating basic and diluted EPS is an amount equal to the net loss attributable to ORBCOMM Inc. common stockholders for the periods presented. The denominator in calculating basic EPS is the weighted-average shares outstanding for the respective periods. The denominator in calculating diluted EPS is the weighted-average shares outstanding, plus the dilutive effect of unvested SAR and RSU grants and shares of Series A convertible preferred stock, if any, for the respective periods. The following sets forth the basic and diluted calculations of EPS for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Net loss attributable to ORBCOMM Inc.
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(39,694
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,048
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53,777
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,313
|
)
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
73,762
|
|
|
|
70,997
|
|
|
|
72,396
|
|
|
|
70,866
|
|
Dilutive effect of unvested SARs and RSUs and shares
of Series A convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Diluted number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
73,762
|
|
|
|
70,997
|
|
|
|
72,396
|
|
|
|
70,866
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.74
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.74
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
The computation of net loss attributable to ORBCOMM Inc. common stockholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Net loss attributable to ORBCOMM Inc.
|
|
$
|
(39,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,041
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53,765
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,306
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends on Series A convertible preferred
stock
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to ORBCOMM Inc.
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(39,694
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,048
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53,777
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,313
|
)
|
17
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
6. Satellite Network and Other Equipment
Satellite network and other equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
381
|
|
|
$
|
381
|
|
Satellite network
|
|
|
193,358
|
|
|
|
231,782
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
42,243
|
|
|
|
30,758
|
|
Computer hardware
|
|
|
5,245
|
|
|
|
4,707
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,974
|
|
|
|
7,522
|
|
Assets under construction
|
|
|
14,748
|
|
|
|
11,284
|
|
|
|
|
263,949
|
|
|
|
286,434
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(87,845
|
)
|
|
|
(70,593
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
176,104
|
|
|
$
|
215,841
|
|
During the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company capitalized internal costs attributable to the design, development and enhancements of the Company’s products and services in the amount of $3,232 and $2,215, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company capitalized internal costs attributable to the design, development and enhancements of the Company’s products and services in the amount of $9,840 and $6,947, respectively.
Depreciation expense for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $8,850 and $8,048, respectively, including depreciation of internal-use software of $1,602 and $889, respectively. Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $25,891 and $22,429, respectively, including depreciation of internal-use software of $4,437 and $2,534, respectively.
For the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, 61% and 72% of depreciation and amortization expense, respectively, relate to cost of services and 8% and 7%, respectively, relate to cost of product sales, as these assets support the Company’s revenue generating activities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, 63% and 69% of depreciation and amortization expense, respectively, relate to cost of services and 8% and 10%, respectively, relate to cost of product sales, as these assets support the Company’s revenue generating activities.
As of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, assets under construction primarily consist of costs associated with acquiring, developing and testing software and hardware for internal and external use that have not yet been placed into service.
During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company recorded an impairment loss on one of its leased AIS satellites. The impairment loss of $466 was determined based on the net carrying value of the asset at the time of the impairment and was recorded in depreciation and amortization in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016. In addition, the Company decreased satellite network and other equipment, net and the associated accumulated depreciation on the condensed consolidated balance sheet by $2,374 and $1,908, respectively.
In August 2016, the Company lost communication with one of its OG2 satellites launched in July 2014. The Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $10,680 to write-off the net book value of the satellite. In addition, the Company decreased satellite network and other equipment by $13,474 and associated accumulated depreciation by $2,794 to remove the asset as of September 30, 2016.
In December 2016, the Company lost communication with one of its OG1 Plane D satellites. In the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company decreased each of satellite network and other equipment, net and associated accumulated depreciation by $137, representing the fully depreciated value of the satellite.
One OG2 satellite that was launched in December 2015 experienced a solar array anomaly in July 2016 that resulted in the satellite entering a safe mode and being taken out of commercial service.
This satellite had previously been intermittently providing AIS service and regularly communicating with the ground infrastructure.
In April 2017, communication was lost with this OG2 satellite. The Company’s satellite engineering team developed and uploaded new software designed to prevent a similar solar array anomaly from occurring on other OG2 satellites.
18
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
In June 2017, there was a loss of communication with the prototype OG2 satellite that was launched in December 2015, and in July 2017 there was
a loss of communication with an OG2 satellite that was launched in July 2014. The Company established a comprehensive
investigative team that included
outside independent consultants, internal engineering and OG2 contractors to determine the root cause o
f the anomalies affecting these three OG2 satellites (described in this and the prior paragraph) and associated corrective measures. The investigative team identified two primary potential causes for the loss of communication and developed operational pro
cedures and software enhancements to mitigate the risk of a similar anomaly from occurring on other OG2 satellites. The investigative team did not identify a systemic design flaw in the OG2 satellites.
On October 31, 2017, the Company’s Audit Committee of the Board of Directors concluded, based on management’s recommendation and the information provided by the investigative team, that a non-cash impairment charge of $31,224 should be recorded as a recognized subsequent event in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 855 “Subsequent Events” to write-off the net book value of the three OG2 satellites for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 and decreased satellite network and other equipment by $39,576 and associated accumulated depreciation by $8,352 to remove the assets as of September 30, 2017. The impairment charge is reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. No amount of the impairment charge represents a cash expenditure.
Satellite network capacity remains multiple times more capable than current demand, while there has been a small effect on message delivery times.
7. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over the estimated fair values of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets.
Goodwill consisted of the following:
|
|
Amount
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2017
|
|
$
|
114,033
|
|
Additions through acquisitions
|
|
|
18,961
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2017
|
|
$
|
132,994
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized goodwill of $18,961 in connection with the inthinc Acquisition.
Goodwill is allocated to the Company’s one reportable segment, which is its only reporting unit.
The Company’s intangible assets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2017
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Useful life
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(years)
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Customer lists
|
|
5-20
|
|
$
|
110,057
|
|
|
$
|
(26,876
|
)
|
|
$
|
83,181
|
|
|
$
|
91,757
|
|
|
$
|
(20,026
|
)
|
|
$
|
71,731
|
|
Patents and
technology
|
|
5-10
|
|
|
23,032
|
|
|
|
(7,534
|
)
|
|
|
15,498
|
|
|
|
16,556
|
|
|
|
(5,990
|
)
|
|
|
10,566
|
|
Trade names and
trademarks
|
|
1-2
|
|
|
2,883
|
|
|
|
(2,815
|
)
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
2,885
|
|
|
|
(2,637
|
)
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
135,972
|
|
|
$
|
(37,225
|
)
|
|
$
|
98,747
|
|
|
$
|
111,198
|
|
|
$
|
(28,653
|
)
|
|
$
|
82,545
|
|
The weighted-average amortization period for the intangible assets is 11.4 years. The weighted-average amortization period for customer lists, patents and technology and trade names and trademarks is 12.1, 9.4 and 1.2 years, respectively.
Amortization expense was $3,191 and $3,110 for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Amortization expense was $8,572 and $9,239 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
19
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
Estimated annual amortization expense for intangible assets subsequent to September 30, 2017 is as follows:
|
|
Amount
|
|
2017 (remaining)
|
|
$
|
3,097
|
|
2018
|
|
|
12,044
|
|
2019
|
|
|
12,008
|
|
2020
|
|
|
11,727
|
|
2021
|
|
|
11,262
|
|
2022
|
|
|
10,807
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
37,802
|
|
|
|
$
|
98,747
|
|
8. Accrued Liabilities
The Company’s accrued liabilities consisted of the following:
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
7,407
|
|
|
$
|
7,456
|
|
Warranty
|
|
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
Acquired customer product liabilities
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Corporate income tax payable
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
Contingent consideration amount
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
Accrued satellite network and other equipment
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
Accrued inventory purchases
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
OG2 satellite milestone payable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,609
|
|
Accrued interest expense
|
|
|
9,444
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
Accrued professional fees
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
876
|
|
Accrued airtime charges
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
8,903
|
|
|
|
7,207
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,090
|
|
|
$
|
30,431
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, changes in accrued warranty obligations consisted of the following:
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
1,842
|
|
|
$
|
2,321
|
|
Warranty liabilities assumed through acquisition
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of fair value adjustment of warranty
liabilities acquired through acquisitions
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Reduction and amortization of fair value adjustment
of warranty liabilities acquired through acquisitions
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
Warranty expense
|
|
|
1,825
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
Warranty charges
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
(607
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
$
|
1,995
|
|
20
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
9. Deferred Revenues
Deferred revenues consisted of the following:
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Service activation fees
|
|
$
|
5,837
|
|
|
$
|
7,594
|
|
Prepaid services
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
|
|
2,777
|
|
Extended warranty revenues
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
9,297
|
|
|
|
10,392
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(6,738
|
)
|
|
|
(7,414
|
)
|
Long-term portion
|
|
$
|
2,559
|
|
|
$
|
2,978
|
|
10. Note Payable-Related Party
In connection with the acquisition of a majority interest in Satcom International Group plc in 2005, the Company recorded an indebtedness to OHB Technology A.G. (formerly known as OHB Teledata A.G.), a stockholder of the Company. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the principal balance of the note payable was €1,138 and it had a carrying value of $1,343 and $1,195, respectively. The carrying value was based on the note’s estimated fair value at the time of acquisition. The difference between the carrying value and principal balance was being amortized to interest expense over the estimated life of the note of six years which ended in September 30, 2011. This note does not bear interest and has no fixed repayment term. Repayment will be made from the distribution profits, as defined in the note agreement, of ORBCOMM Europe LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The note has been classified as long-term and the Company does not expect any repayments to be required prior to September 30, 2018.
11. Note Payable
Senior Secured Notes
On April 10, 2017, the Company issued $250,000 aggregate principal amount of 8.0% senior secured notes due 2024 (the “Senior Secured Notes”). The Senior Secured Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated as of April 10, 2017, among the Company, certain of its domestic subsidiaries party thereto (the “Guarantors”) and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee and collateral agent (the “Indenture”). The Senior Secured Notes are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by the Guarantors, and are secured on a first priority basis by (i) pledges of capital stock of certain of the Company’s directly and indirectly owned subsidiaries; and (ii) substantially all of the other property and assets of the Company and the Guarantors, to the extent a first priority security interest is able to be granted or perfected therein, and subject, in all cases, to certain specified exceptions. Interest payments are due on the Senior Secured Notes semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 beginning October 1, 2017.
The Company will have the option to redeem some or all of the Senior Secured Notes at any time on or after April 1, 2020, at redemption prices set forth in the Indenture plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. The Company will also have the option to redeem some or all of the Senior Secured Notes at any time before April 1, 2020 at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes to be redeemed, plus a “make-whole” premium and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. In addition, at any time before April 1, 2020, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption, with the proceeds from certain equity issuances.
The Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s and its restricted subsidiaries’ ability to: (i) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; (ii) pay dividends, make other distributions or repurchase or redeem capital stock; (iii) prepay, redeem or repurchase certain indebtedness; (iv) make loans and investments; (v) sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of assets; (vi) incur or permit to exist certain liens; (vii) enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates; (viii) enter into agreements restricting the Company’s subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends; and (ix) consolidate, amalgamate, merge or sell all or substantially all of their assets; subject, in all cases, to certain specified exceptions. Such limitations have various exceptions and baskets as set forth in the Indenture, including the incurrence by the Company and its restricted subsidiaries of indebtedness under potential new credit facilities in the aggregate principal amount at any one time outstanding not to exceed $50 million.
21
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
In connection with the issuance of the Senior Secured Notes, the Company incurred debt issuance costs of approximately $5,431. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 20
17, amortization of the debt issuance costs was $194 and $368, respectively. The Company recorded charges of $5,197 and $9,824 to interest expense on its statement of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017,
respectively,
relat
ed to interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs associated with the Senior Secured Notes.
Termination of Secured Credit Facilities
On April 10, 2017, a portion of the proceeds of the issuance of the Senior Secured Notes was used to repay in full the Company’s outstanding obligations under, and to terminate the Company’s $150,000 outstanding credit facilities incurred pursuant to the Credit Agreement, as defined below, resulting in an early payment fee of $1,500 and an additional expense associated with the remaining unamortized debt issuance cost and fees of $2,368.
Secured Credit Facilities
On September 30, 2014, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Macquarie CAF LLC (the “Lender”) in order to refinance the Company’s $45,000 9.5% per annum senior notes. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the Lender provided secured credit facilities (the “Secured Credit Facilities”) in an aggregate amount of $160,000 comprised of (i) a term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $70,000 (the “Initial Term Loan Facility”); (ii) a $10,000 revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”); (iii) a term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $10,000 (the “Term B2 Facility”), the proceeds of which were used to partially finance the acquisition of InSync Solutions, Inc. in 2015; and (iv) a term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $70,000 (the “Term B3 Facility”), the proceeds of which were used partially finance the acquisition of SkyWave Mobile Communications, Inc. in 2015. The Secured Credit Facilities bear interest, at the Company’s election, of a per annum rate equal to either (a) a base rate plus 3.75% or (b) LIBOR plus 4.75%, with a LIBOR floor of 1.00%.
In connection with entering into the Credit Agreement, and the subsequent funding of the Initial Term Loan Facility, Revolving Credit Facility, Term B2 Facility and the Term B3 Facility, the Company incurred debt issuance costs of approximately $4,481. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017, amortization of the debt issuance costs was $0 and $229, respectively. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, amortization of the debt issuance costs was $227 and $681, respectively. The Company recorded charges of $0 and $2,642 to interest expense on its statement of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, related to interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs associated with the Initial Term Loan Facility, the Term B2 and the Term B3 Facilities.
12. Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock
The Company currently has 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized.
Series A convertible preferred stock
During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company issued dividends in the amount of 1,078 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock to the holders of the Series A convertible preferred stock. As of September 30, 2017, dividends in arrears were $4.
Common Stock
As of September 30, 2017, the Company has reserved 16,741,371 shares of common stock for future issuances related to employee stock compensation plans.
On June 15, 2017, the Company completed a private placement of 1,552,795 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $9.66 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $15,000. The per share price of $9.66 was calculated as 95% of the volume-weighted average trading price of common stock 30 trading days ending on June 14, 2017.
22
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
13. Segment
Information
The Company operates in one reportable segment, IoT services. Other than satellites in orbit, goodwill and intangible assets, long-lived assets outside of the United States are not significant. The Company’s foreign exchange exposure is limited as approximately 88% of the Company’s consolidated revenue is collected in US dollars. The following table summarizes revenues on a percentage basis by geographic regions, based on the region in which the customer is located.
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
United States
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
South America
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Japan
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Europe
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
14. Income taxes
For the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company’s income tax expense was $479, compared to a tax benefit of $9 for the prior year period. The change in the income tax provision for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 primarily related to a change in the geographical mix of income which increased taxable non-U.S. earnings before income taxes when compared to the prior year period.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company’s income tax expense was $1,192, compared to a tax provision of $369 for the prior year period. The change in the income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily related to a change in the geographical mix of income which increased taxable non-U.S. earnings before income taxes when compared to the prior year period.
As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company maintained a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets primarily attributable to operations in the United States, as the realization of such assets was not considered more likely than not.
There were no changes to the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The Company does not expect any significant changes to its unrecognized tax positions during the next twelve months.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. No interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
15. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
ORBCOMM v. CalAmp Corp
.
On April 7, 2016, the Company filed a complaint against defendant CalAmp Corp. (“CalAmp”) in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia alleging infringement of five patents, seeking compensatory damages, treble damages, and an injunction.
On May 27, 2016, CalAmp filed a motion to dismiss the Company’s claims on the basis, inter alia, that the Company’s patents are directed at ineligible subject matter and are therefore invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. On July 22, 2016, the court denied CalAmp’s motion; however, CalAmp filed a motion for reconsideration of its motion to dismiss. On October 19, 2016, the court denied CalAmp’s motion for reconsideration with respect to four of the five patents in suits and granted CalAmp’s motion to invalidate one of the Company’s patents in-suit as an unpatentable abstract idea.
On July 18, 2016, CalAmp filed its answer to the Company’s complaint and counterclaim for (1) declaratory judgment of unenforceability of ORBCOMM’s patents in-suit; (2) inequitable conduct related to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office action to correct one of the patents in-suit; and (3) an award of legal fees to CalAmp.
23
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
On January 25, 2017, the court ruled on the disputed claim construction issues with
respect to the remaining patent in-suit, in which it ruled that the claim term “wireless network” is limited to wireless pager networks. While this claim construction resulted in a stipulation of non-infringement, the Company believes this claim construct
ion to be incorrect and, prior to the global settlement described below, was in the process of filing an appeal which would have requested that this claim construction ruling be reviewed on a de novo basis.
Each of the Company and CalAmp filed motions for summary judgment with respect to CalAmp’s counterclaim for inequitable conduct related to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office action to correct the one remaining patent-in-suit. CalAmp’s motion requested summary judgment finding inequitable conduct rendering the patent unenforceable and providing a basis to seek an award of its legal fees. The Company’s motion requested summary judgment to dismiss such counterclaim.
In April 2017, the parties settled the litigation pursuant to the CalAmp Settlement Agreement, as defined below.
CalAmp Wireless Networks Corporation v. ORBCOMM Inc
.
On October 26, 2016, a patent infringement lawsuit was filed against the Company by CalAmp Wireless Networks Corporation (“CalAmp Wireless”) in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. CalAmp Wireless alleged that certain of the Company’s modems, devices and geofencing systems for tracking and monitoring vehicles, machinery, and other assets infringe on two patents asserted by CalAmp Wireless. CalAmp Wireless did not make a specific damages claim, but sought compensatory damages, treble damages, and equitable relief.
On February 9, 2017, the court invalidated the majority of the claims in one of the two patents in-suit brought by CalAmp Wireless.
On April 24, 2017, the Company and CalAmp Wireless entered into a Confidential Settlement, General Release, and License Agreement (the “CalAmp Settlement Agreement”). The CalAmp Settlement Agreement resolves both pending litigation matters between the parties, described above, and provides that each of the Company and CalAmp Wireless grant the other royalty free licenses and covenants not to sue for the patents-in-suit described above, as well as general releases. Neither party made a settlement payment to the other party. Each of the Company and CalAmp will bear its own costs and fees associated with the prior litigation.
In addition to the foregoing matters, from time to time, the Company is involved in various litigation claims or matters involving ordinary and routine claims incidental to its business. While the outcome of any such claims or litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, management currently believes that the outcome of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition.
Airtime credits
In 2001, in connection with the organization of ORBCOMM Europe and the reorganization of the ORBCOMM business in Europe, the Company agreed to grant certain country representatives in Europe approximately $3,736 in airtime credits. The Company has not recorded the airtime credits as a liability for the following reasons: (i) the Company has no obligation to pay the unused airtime credits if they are not utilized; and (ii) the airtime credits are earned by the country representatives only when the Company generates revenue from the country representatives. The airtime credits have no expiration date. Accordingly, the Company is recording airtime credits as services are rendered and these airtime credits are recorded net of revenues from the country representatives. For the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, airtime credits used totaled approximately $8 and $7, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, airtime credits used totaled approximately $23 and $21, respectively. As of September 30, 2017 and 2016, unused credits granted by the Company were approximately $1,986 and $2,016, respectively.
16. Subsequent Events
On October 2, 2017, ORBCOMM Technology Ireland Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a share purchase agreement with Blue Tree Systems Limited, a global leader in enterprise fleet management software for the trucking and transportation industries for an aggregate consideration of (i) $34,750, subject to a working capital adjustment; (ii) issuance of 191,022 shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $10.47 per share, which reflected the Company’s common stock closing price one business day prior to the closing date; and (iii) additional consideration up to $5,750 based on Blue Tree Systems Limited achieving certain thresholds.
On September 30, 2017, the Company classified $34,500 as cash held for acquisition on the condensed consolidated balance sheet for the acquisition of Blue Tree Systems Limited.
24
ORBCOMM Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(All amounts in thousands except share amounts, per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)-continued
25