NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 – Organization
Merion, Inc. (the “Company”), a Nevada corporation, was formed on February 4, 2011. Its predecessor, E-World USA Holding, Inc., was a California company incorporated in 2007 (“E-World CA”). In April 2011, E-World CA entered into a merger agreement with its wholly-owned subsidiary with the same name, E-World USA Holding, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“E-World NV”) that was the survivor of the merger and became the Company. Under the Merger Agreement, the Company issued 90,000,000 shares of its common stock on a one share for one share basis for each share of E-World CA’s common stock issued and outstanding at the date of the merger. In addition, the Company issued its Type A Warrants and Type B Warrants in exchange for comparable warrants issued and outstanding of E-World CA at the date of the merger. On June 27, 2017, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State for the State of Nevada to change its name from E-World NV, effective immediately, to Merion, Inc.
The Company is a provider of health and nutritional supplements and personal care products currently sold on the Internet through our website, www.dailynu.com, and to wholesale distributors.
Note 2 – Going Concern
There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern as a result of our lack of significant revenues, significant recurring losses and negative working capital. If we are unable to generate significant revenue or secure financing, we may be required to cease or curtail our operations. Our financial statements do not include adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Management is trying to alleviate the going concern risk by: engaging external sales representatives to sell the Company’s products, securing various financing resources, including but not limited to, borrowing from the Company’s major shareholder, private placements and the possibility of raising funds through a future public offering.
Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
These unaudited condensed financial statements have been presented by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, are expressed in U.S. dollars. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements, have been included. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year. The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with information included in the Company’s 2016 annual report on Form 10-K filed on May 1, 2017.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant accounting estimates reflected in the Company’s financial statements include the useful lives of property and equipment, collectability of receivables and fair value of the warrant rescission liability for the Company’s Type A & B Warrants. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are comprised primarily of money market accounts and foreign and domestic bank accounts. To reduce its credit risk, the Company monitors the credit standing of the financial institutions that hold the Company’s cash and cash equivalents.
Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are periodically evaluated for collectability based on credit history with customers and their current financial condition. Bad debt expense or write-offs of receivables are determined on the basis of loss experience, known and inherent risks in the receivable portfolio and current economic conditions.
The accounts receivable balance and allowance for doubtful accounts are as follows:
|
|
September 30,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
43,276
|
|
|
$
|
121,207
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(43,276
|
)
|
|
|
(43,276
|
)
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
77,931
|
|
Movement of allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows:
|
|
Nine months
ended
September 30,
2017
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
43,276
|
|
|
$
|
25,236
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18,040
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
43,276
|
|
|
$
|
43,276
|
|
Inventory
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (determined on a first-in, first-out basis) or net realizable value. Inventory consists of nutritional and skin-care products. Management reviews inventory on hand for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable items, as compared to future demand requirements and the shelf life of the various products. Based on the review, the Company records inventory write-downs when costs exceed expected net realizable value. The inventories’ shelf lives are approximately 3 years.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Upon disposition, the cost and related accumulated depreciation is removed from the books, and any resulting gain or loss is included in operations. The Company provides for depreciation using straight-line methods over the estimated useful lives of various classes as follow:
Computer and software
|
|
3 to 5 years
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
5 to 10 years
|
Vehicles
|
|
5 to 7 years
|
Leasehold improvement
|
|
over expected lease term
|
Repairs and maintenance is charged to operations when incurred while betterments and renewals are capitalized.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, including, property and equipment and intangible assets with finite lives are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances (such as a significant adverse change to market conditions that will impact the future use of the assets) indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the recoverability of the assets based on the undiscounted future cash flows the assets are expected to generate and recognizes an impairment loss when estimated discounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset plus net proceeds expected from disposition of the asset, if any, are less than the carrying value of the asset. When the Company identifies an impairment, the Company reduces the carrying amount of the asset to its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flows approach or, when available and appropriate, to comparable market values. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, no impairment of long-lived assets was recognized.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue represents product deposits advanced by customers on specified product orders or on future orders that have not been shipped as of the balance sheet date. Deferred revenue also represents shipping fees deposits advanced by customers in relation to the unshipped product orders. Deferred revenue is reduced when the related sale is recognized in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy.
Accrued Bonus
Accrued bonus represents amounts earned by the Company’s Affiliated Members for product sales. These bonuses are in the form of rebate credits that can be used to order the Company’s products, or the Affiliate Members can request a rebate in cash.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
ASC 825 requires that the Company discloses estimated fair values of financial instruments. The Company believes the carrying value of short-term debt is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to rates being currently offered.
As defined in ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company utilized the market data of similar entities in its industry or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. The Company classifies fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurement).
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 –
|
Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
|
Level 2 –
|
Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date and includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.
|
|
|
Level 3 –
|
Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.
|
The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value as of:
September 30, 2017
Recurring Fair Value Measures
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Rescission Liability – Type A Warrants
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
7,165,413
|
|
|
$
|
7,165,413
|
|
Rescission Liability – Type B Warrants
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
621,427
|
|
|
|
621,427
|
|
Total
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
7,786,840
|
|
|
$
|
7,786,840
|
|
December 31, 2016:
Recurring Fair Value Measures
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Rescission Liability – Type A Warrants
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
7,165,413
|
|
|
$
|
7,165,413
|
|
Rescission Liability – Type B Warrants
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
249,111
|
|
|
|
249,111
|
|
Total
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
7,414,524
|
|
|
$
|
7,414,524
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
2017
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
7,414,524
|
|
|
$
|
7,414,524
|
|
Change in fair value of Rescission Liability – Type B Warrants
|
|
|
372,316
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
7,786,840
|
|
|
$
|
7,414,524
|
|
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when a formal arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, the delivery is completed, no other significant obligations of the Company exist and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company generally receives the net sales price in cash or through credit card payments when products are ordered. When the Company has sales events whereby the sales are non-returnable or non-refundable, the revenue is recognized when products are shipped.
The Company also recognized revenue on shipping and handling fees charged to the Company’s customers. Shipping and handling fee revenue is recognized when products have been delivered. Shipping and handling fee revenues totaled $2,896 and $12,204 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and totaled $5,101 and $23,275 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Product returns are allowed for unopened products purchased under regular sales terms within 60 days. Allowances for product returns are provided at the time the sale is recorded using historic return rates for each country and the relevant return pattern. Historically the Company has a nearly zero return rate. Hence, the allowance as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is estimated at $0.
In addition to the Company’s 60-day return policy, the Company, at its discretion, may accept a customer’s application for a buy-back of products previously sold within one year at 90% of the original product costs less commissions and shipping costs. The Company implemented its buy-back policy on January 1, 2012. To date, the Company has not received any buy-back applications. As a result, no allowance for buy-backs has been recorded as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
The majority of the Company’s revenues are generated from China. Revenues generated from other countries or within the United States are immaterial to our financial statements. While all products are priced in U.S. currency, the Company accepts payments in U.S. dollars and Hong Kong dollars.
Shipping and Handling Expenses
Shipping and handling costs incurred by the Company are included in selling expenses and totaled $13,967 and $13,019 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and totaled $24,824 and $36,358 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Operating Leases
The Company leases its property under an operating lease.
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes ASC 740, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America regarding earnings per share (“EPS”) requires presentation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share in conjunction with the disclosure of the methodology used in computing the weighted average number of shares outstanding.
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share takes into account the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised and converted into common stock. Diluted loss per shares does not include these items because they would be anti-dilutive.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Type A and Type B Warrants did not have a dilutive effect on loss per share, as the Company had incurred a loss for the periods.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are cash, accounts receivable and other receivables arising from its normal business activities. The Company maintains balances at financial institutions which, from time to time, may exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured limits for the banks located in the United States, or may exceed Hong Kong Deposit Protection Board (HKDPB) insured limits for the banks located in Hong Kong.
For the three months ended September 30, 2017, one customer accounted for approximately 29% of the Company’s sales and for the three months ended September 30, 2016, one customer accounted for approximately 28% of the Company’s sales.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, one customer accounted for approximately 36% of the Company’s sales and for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, two customers accounted for approximately 43% of the Company’s sales.
For the three months ended September 30, 2017, three suppliers accounted for approximately 89% of the Company’s product purchases and for the three months ended September 30, 2016, three suppliers accounted for approximately 92% of the Company’s product purchases.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, two suppliers accounted for approximately 92% of the Company’s product purchases and for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, three suppliers accounted for approximately 96% of the Company’s product purchases.
Contingencies
The Company may have issued Type A Warrants and Type B Warrants to U.S. citizens or residents in violation of federal securities laws and may be subject to sanctions for such violations. Further, the exchange of the warrants for common shares may also have been in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. Thus, risk exists that the SEC or former warrant holders may bring legal action against the Company, its officers and directors for securities law violations. The Company determined it is reasonably possible that a loss may have been incurred as a result of these issuances. The Company has recorded a liability equal to the amount it believes it would pay to redeem the warrants. See Note 4.
Related Parties
A party is considered to be related to the Company if the party directly or indirectly or through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal owners of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal owners of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. A party which can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or if it has an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests is also a related party.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 Amendments to the ASC 842 Leases. This update requires a lessee to recognize the assets and liability (the lease liability) arising from operating leases on the balance sheet for the lease term. When measuring assets and liabilities arising from a lease, a lessee (and a lessor) should include payments to be made in optional periods only if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise an option to extend the lease or not to exercise an option to terminate the lease. Within a twelve months or less lease term, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election not to recognize lease assets and liabilities. If a lessee makes this election, it should recognize lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. In transition, this update will be effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not currently expect the adoption of ASU 2016-02 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements unless it enters into a new long-term lease.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (ASC 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The objective is to identity, evaluate, and improve areas of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for which cost and complexity can be reduced while maintaining or improving the usefulness of the information provided to users of financial statements. The areas for simplification include the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Some of the areas apply only to nonpublic entities. For public business entities, the ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. For all other entities, the ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not impact our financial statements.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The objective is to clarify the two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for these areas. The ASU affects the guidance in ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for this ASU are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in ASC 606 (and any other Topic amended by ASU 2014-09). ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-10 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. The objective is to address certain issues identified by the FASB-IASB Joint Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition. The amendments in this Update affect the guidance in Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this Update are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for ASC 606 (and any other Topic amended by Update 2014-09). Accounting Standards Update 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, defers the effective date of Update 2014-09 by one year. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-12 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, to address diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments provide guidance on the following eight specific cash flow issues: (1) Debt Prepayment or Debt Extinguishment Costs; (2) Settlement of Zero-Coupon Debt Instruments or Other Debt Instruments with Coupon Interest Rates That Are Insignificant in Relation to the Effective Interest Rate of the Borrowing; (3) Contingent Consideration Payments Made after a Business Combination; (4) Proceeds from the Settlement of Insurance Claims; (5) Proceeds from the Settlement of Corporate-Owned Life Insurance Policies, including Bank-Owned; (6) Life Insurance Policies; (7) Distributions Received from Equity Method Investees; (8) Beneficial Interests in Securitization Transactions; and Separately Identifiable Cash Flows and Application of the Predominance Principle. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. If it is impracticable to apply the amendments retrospectively for some of the issues, the amendments for those issues would be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18), which requires companies to include amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in cash and cash equivalents when reconciling beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance will be effective in the first quarterly of 2018 and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-18 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the definition of a business. The amendments in this ASU is to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company does not believe the adoption of this ASU would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Scope of Modification Accounting, which amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements and provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting under ASC 718. For all entities, this ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on the accompanying statements of operations and other comprehensive loss and cash flows.
Note 4 – Rescission Liability – Type A & B Warrants
Type A Warrants
As an incentive to increase sales and bring in additional members, the Company’s predecessor, E-World CA, issued type A warrants to its sales members. Upon the merger of E-World CA with and into the Company in 2011, the Company issued to those sales member replacement type A warrants with substantially similar terms and conditions (the “Type A Warrants”).
Upon issuance, Type A Warrants had no expiration and could be exercised for:
|
(1)
|
common shares of the Company at a ratio of 1:1 upon a going public event in the U.S.,
|
|
(2)
|
products of the Company at their retail prices, or
|
|
(3)
|
cancelled membership and a refund in cash at 75% of face value.
|
From inception on January 5, 2007 to December 31, 2010, new sales members of E-World CA who purchased a package of products received an option to include the equivalent Type A Warrants in the purchase. Net cash proceeds from the equivalent Type A Warrants sold to sales members by E-World CA through December 31, 2010 were $8,169,707. During 2011, a total of 18,000 Type A Warrants were exercised for cash refunds totaling $22,950 and products of the Company for $7,200. During 2012, all of the remaining Type A Warrants were exchanged by the Company for the following:
|
(1)
|
842,300 warrants for $495,170 in cash refunds
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
10,300 warrants for $16,650 in products
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
23,216,188 warrants for shares of common stock
|
Our Type A Warrants may have been issued and exercised in violation of United States federal securities laws. We recorded the fair value of these warrants as a liability on the date of issuance (“Rescission Liabilities – Type A Warrants”). The value of the Rescission Liabilities – Type A Warrants was determined by calculating the maximum potential cash outlay if all Type A Warrant holders exercised using option 3 above. The total fair value was determined by calculating how much each Type A Warrant holder would receive in cash if they exercised the warrant by canceling their membership and receiving 75% of the face value of their warrants in cash and then adding these amounts together to reach the total potential cash outlay. The face value of the warrant is the stated value assigned to each Type A Warrant. The face value determines how much the sales member could receive if exercised for cash and a canceled membership. If sales members exercise their warrants for cash, the Company reduces the liability by the amount of cash paid. If sales members exercise their warrants for products, the Company recognizes revenue equal to the retail value of the related products once they have been delivered. During 2014, the Company refunded $2,250, and members returned 9,300 Type A Warrant shares. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, 23,206,888 shares are included in Rescission Liabilities – Type A Warrants and totaled $7,165,413.
Type B Warrants
During 2009 and 2010, the Company’s predecessor, E-World CA, issued a total of 2,485,708 type B warrants as sales incentive compensation to sales members. The type B warrants entitled the holders to collectively receive 2,485,708 common shares upon a going public event in the U.S. as specified in the warrant. No additional consideration for the common shares was required upon exercise. Upon the merger of E-World CA with and into the Company in 2011, the Company issued to those sales members replacement type B warrants with substantially similar terms and conditions (the “Type B Warrants”). During 2012, all of the Company’s Type B Warrants were exercised for shares of common stock. The Type B Warrants may have been issued and exercised in violation of United States federal securities laws. We recorded “Rescission Liabilities – Type B Warrants” at the fair value of the shares issued upon exercise of these warrants. The fair value of the common shares was initially estimated using comparable sales of common stock prior to August 9, 2017. The Company determined that comparable sales of stock is more reliable as the fair value because goods or services received cannot be reliably measured. On August 9, 2017, the Company’s common stock resumed trading in the OTC market. As a result, the Company began valuing the fair value of the common shares using the closing price of the Company’s common stock. The fair value of the Type B warrants as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $621,427 and $249,111, respectively.
We cannot estimate when this rescission offer liability will end for either the Type A Warrants or the Type B Warrants as this liability will end only when the Company and its legal counsel conclude the rescission liability now shown in the financial statements becomes at least a remote possibility, which has not yet occurred and we cannot reasonably predict at this time, when or if, it will occur.
Note 5 – Inventory
Inventories consist of finished goods available for resale and can be categorized as:
|
|
September 30,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Nutrition supplements
|
|
$
|
87,438
|
|
|
$
|
81,390
|
|
Skin-care products
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
87,652
|
|
|
$
|
81,790
|
|
Note 6 – Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of following:
|
|
September 30,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Computer equipment and software
|
|
$
|
114,953
|
|
|
$
|
114,953
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
26,686
|
|
|
|
26,686
|
|
Automobiles
|
|
|
179,677
|
|
|
|
179,677
|
|
Leasehold improvement
|
|
|
40,053
|
|
|
|
40,053
|
|
Total
|
|
|
361,369
|
|
|
|
361,369
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(312,291
|
)
|
|
|
(288,341
|
)
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
49,078
|
|
|
$
|
73,028
|
|
Depreciation expense totaled $7,949 and $8,207 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Depreciation expense totaled $23,950 and $25,030 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Note 7 – Debt
Due to employee
The Company has borrowed money from an employee to fund operations. These advances do not bear interest, are unsecured and are due on demand. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company owed $95,000 to an employee.
Due to third parties, interest bearing
The Company has borrowed money from third parties to fund operations. These third parties consist of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer’s friends and the spouse of the Company’s former board member. These advances have an annual interest rate of 6%, are unsecured and are due on demand. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company owed $109,030 to these third parties.
Following the resignation of one of the Company’s board members in January 2017, the Company reclassified an outstanding loan balance of $20,000 from the spouse of the former board member from advances from related parties, interest bearing, to due to third parties, interest bearing, as of December 31, 2016 to conform to the current year presentation.
Interest expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 for above loans amounted to $1,649 and $1,404, respectively.
Interest expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 for above loans amounted to $4,684 and $1,722, respectively.
Due to third parties, non-interest bearing
The Company has borrowed money from third parties to fund operations. These third parties consist of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer’s friends and the Company’s former board member. These advances do not bear interest, are unsecured, and are due on demand. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company owed $756,175 and $326,292 to these third parties, respectively.
Following the resignation of one of the Company’s former board members in January 2017, the Company reclassified the former board member’s outstanding loan balance of $50,000 from advances from related parties, non-interest bearing, to due to third parties, non-interest bearing, as of December 31, 2016 to conform to the current year presentation.
Long term loan
In December 2015, the Company refinanced a prior loan balance of $51,263 with an annual interest rate of 2.99% to be repaid over 48 months.
Future maturities of long term debt are as follows:
Three months ended December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
2,129
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
13,002
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2019
|
|
|
13,395
|
|
Total
|
|
|
28,526
|
|
Current portion of long term debt
|
|
|
(11,844
|
)
|
Long term debt
|
|
$
|
16,682
|
|
Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 for the above loan amounted to $237 and $330, respectively.
Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 for the above loan amounted to $781 and $1,059, respectively.
Note 8 – Related Party Transactions
Due to shareholder, interest bearing
In January 2016, Mr. Dinghua Wang, a principal shareholder, director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pledged certain of his personal assets and obtained a personal loan from which he funded the operations of the Company. In consideration for the funds the Company received, the Company agreed to pay the interest of this loan on Mr. Wang’s behalf. This loan has an annual borrowing rate of 9.99%. During the year ended December 31, 2016, Mr. Wang’s advances to the Company totaled $471,603. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the balance on the principal of the loan due to Mr. Wang, interest bearing, amounted to $471,603. The full balance of $471,603 is to be repaid on February 1, 2019.
Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 for the above loan amounted to $12,488 and $12,487, respectively.
Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 for the above loan amounted to $37,463 and $33,300, respectively.
Due to shareholder, non-interest bearing
From time to time, Mr. Dinghua Wang, a principal shareholder, director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, advances monies to the Company and the Company repays such advances. Such business transactions are recorded as due to or from Mr. Wang at the time of the transaction. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, advances totaled $34,937 and $161,889, respectively, and payments to Mr. Wang totaled $106,380 and $189,934, respectively. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the balance due to shareholder, non-interest bearing, amounted to $2,875,727 and $2,947,170, respectively. This balance does not bear interest, is unsecured and is due on demand.
Advances from related parties, interest bearing
During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company borrowed $30,000 and $40,000 from a related party to fund operations, respectively. This related party is the son of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. These advances have an annual interest rate of 10% for the year ended December 31, 2016 and incurred a one-time $5,000 finance charge for the year ended December 31, 2015, are unsecured and are due on demand. Repayment to this related party amounted to $0 and $40,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company owed $30,000 to this related party.
Following the resignation of one of the Company’s board members in January 2017, the Company reclassified an outstanding loan balance of $20,000 from the spouse of the former board member from advances from related parties, interest bearing, to due to third parties, interest bearing, as of December 31, 2016 to conform to the current year presentation.
Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 for the above loan amounted to $756 and $911, respectively.
Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 for the above loan amounted to $2,244 and $980, respectively.
Advances from related parties, non-interest bearing
The Company has borrowed money from certain related parties to fund operations. The related parties consist of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer’s immediate family members and relatives. These advances do not bear interest, are unsecured and are due on demand. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, payment to related parties totaled $15,000. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company owed $518,839 and $533,839, respectively, to these related parties.
Following the resignation of one of the Company’s board members in January 2017, the Company reclassified the Company’s former board member’s outstanding loan balance of $50,000 from advances from related parties, non-interest bearing, to due to third parties, non-interest bearing, as of December 31, 2016 to conform to the current year presentation.
Note 9 – Income Taxes
The following table reconciles the U.S. statutory rates to the Company’s effective tax rate for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2017
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2016
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
2016
|
|
Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
State statutory rate
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
|
(39.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(25.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(39.6
|
)%
|
Permanent difference
|
|
|
(52.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(14.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
The Company uses the liability method, where deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting purposes. The cumulative net operating loss carryforwards that may be applied against future taxable income is approximately $6,231,000 for Federal tax as of September 30, 2017. The cumulative net operating loss carryforwards that may be applied against future taxable income will expire in the years 2031 to 2037. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred a net loss. As the deferred tax asset may not be realizable due to the Company’s recurring losses, management has provided a 100% valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset.
The components of the deferred tax assets is as follows:
|
|
September 30,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Property and equipment - depreciation
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
35,838
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
18,539
|
|
|
|
17,237
|
|
Net operating loss
|
|
|
2,558,106
|
|
|
|
3,661,022
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
2,576,645
|
|
|
|
3,714,097
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,576,645
|
)
|
|
|
(3,714,097
|
)
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
As of September 30, 2017, federal tax returns filed for 2014, 2015 and 2016 remain subject to examination by the taxing authorities. As of September 30, 2017, California tax returns filed for 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 remain subject to examination by the taxing authorities.
The change in the valuation allowance for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $1,137,452 and $242,000, respectively.
Note 10 – Commitments
Operating lease
The Company rents office and warehouse space for its main corporate office from March 2015 to October 2018. The Company’s commitment for minimum lease payments under these operating leases as of September 30, 2017 for the following periods is as follow:
Three months ended December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
9,300
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
31,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
40,300
|
|
The Company incurred rent expenses of $5,346 and $36,150 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The Company incurred rent expenses of $26,746 and $108,450 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Note 11 – Equity
Share Distribution Plan
On March 31, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approved share distribution plans for the Company.
1) The Company will grant up to thirty million shares of common stock to certain persons outside of the United States who have previously worked with the Company as an incentive for these individuals to assist the Company to develop its international market. Mr. Dinghua Wang, a principal shareholder, director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, will voluntarily relinquish up to thirty million shares of common stock owned by him to the Company’s Treasury, and thereafter the Company will issue to persons not citizens or residents of the U.S. an equal number of shares pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933. Accordingly, special legends regarding restrictions on resale of the securities and no-hedging transactions will need to be included on the securities. No shares has been issued or relinquished.
On July 15, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Company’s withdrawal from plan (1) as approved by the Board on March 31, 2017, as the Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders that Mr. Wang distribute these shares directly to the intended recipients. No shares has been transferred as of September 30, 2017
2) To thank the people who, directly or indirectly, loaned funds or referred customers to the Company or purchased products from the Company in connection with the Company’s financial hardship, the Company will issue up to five million shares of common stock to these individuals upon approval by the Board of Directors. In connection with this transaction, Mr. Wang will voluntarily relinquish up to five million shares of common stock owned by him to the Company’s Treasury. To the extent that these share distributions are being made to anyone outside of the U.S., those distributions will be made under Regulation S and must contain appropriate Regulation S subscription agreements and legends. If anyone within U.S. is to receive those shares, the Company must consult with the Company counsel to comply with U.S. securities laws. No shares has been issued or relinquished.
On July 28, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Company’s withdrawal from plan (2) as approved by the Board on March 31, 2017, as the Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders that Mr. Wang distribute these shares directly to the intended recipients. No shares has been transferred as of September 30, 2017.
3) The Company will grant up to twenty million shares (from authorized but unissued shares of its common stock) to persons outside the U.S. who sell Company products based on their sales performance in the future. The Company must determine that this type of incentive compensation is legal and appropriate for each country in which it is utilized. For ease of administration, this plan will be implemented solely for persons outside of the United States pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933. No shares has been issued as of September 30, 2017.
Private placement
On September 1, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Jinhua Wang, an unrelated third party, pursuant to which the Company sold to him in a private placement 110,045 shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at a purchase price of $0.90 per share for an aggregate offering price of $99,400. The sale was completed pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Note 12 – Subsequent Events
On October 10, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Changlin Cao, an unrelated third party, pursuant to which the Company sold to him in a private placement 113,089 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at a purchase price of $0.90 per share for an aggregate offering price of $101,780. The sale was completed pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.