|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
Trilogy
Metals Inc.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
in thousands
of US dollars
|
|
August
31, 2017
$
|
|
|
November
30, 2016
$
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
10,205
|
|
|
|
7,340
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Deposits and prepaid amounts
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
Current investments (note 3)
|
|
|
4,571
|
|
|
|
7,538
|
|
|
|
|
15,981
|
|
|
|
15,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments (note 3)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
Plant and equipment
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
Mineral properties and development costs (note 4)
|
|
|
30,587
|
|
|
|
30,586
|
|
|
|
|
47,048
|
|
|
|
46,747
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 5)
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineral properties purchase option (note 4)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
14,759
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital (note 6)
– unlimited common shares authorized, no par value; Issued –105,667,125 (2016 – 105,286,469)
|
|
|
136,494
|
|
|
|
136,357
|
|
Warrants (note 6(d))
|
|
|
2,163
|
|
|
|
2,163
|
|
Contributed surplus
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Contributed surplus – options (note 6(a, b))
|
|
|
18,392
|
|
|
|
18,134
|
|
Contributed surplus – units (note 6(c))
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
(126,142
|
)
|
|
|
(111,764
|
)
|
|
|
|
32,289
|
|
|
|
46,154
|
|
|
|
|
47,048
|
|
|
|
46,747
|
|
Commitments and
contingencies
(notes 4, 5 and 8)
(See accompanying
notes to the interim consolidated financial statements)
/s/ Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse,
Director
|
|
/s/ Kalidas Madhavpeddi,
Director
|
Approved on
behalf of the Board of Directors
Trilogy
Metals Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss
(unaudited)
in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share amounts
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
For the nine months ended
|
|
|
|
August
31, 2017
$
|
|
|
August
31, 2016
$
|
|
|
August
31, 2017
$
|
|
|
August
31, 2016
$
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Foreign exchange (gain) loss
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
Investor relations
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Mineral properties expense (note 4(d))
|
|
|
8,471
|
|
|
|
3,077
|
|
|
|
10,407
|
|
|
|
4,067
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
Salaries
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
Salaries
– stock-based compensation
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
8,694
|
|
|
|
3,918
|
|
|
|
12,934
|
|
|
|
6,937
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on held for
trading investments
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss on sale of investments
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss on disposal of equipment
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest
and other income
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
Loss from
continuing operations for the period
|
|
|
8,992
|
|
|
|
3,902
|
|
|
|
14,378
|
|
|
|
6,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
Loss
from discontinued operations for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
Loss
and comprehensive loss for the period
|
|
|
8,992
|
|
|
|
4,255
|
|
|
|
14,378
|
|
|
|
7,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per common share
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
105,581,406
|
|
|
|
105,213,320
|
|
|
|
105,524,598
|
|
|
|
105,046,854
|
|
(See accompanying
notes to the interim consolidated financial statements)
Trilogy
Metals Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
(unaudited)
in thousands
of US dollars, except share amounts
|
|
Number
of
shares
outstanding
|
|
|
Share
capital
$
|
|
|
Warrants
$
|
|
|
Contributed
surplus
$
|
|
|
Contributed
surplus –
options
$
|
|
|
Contributed
surplus –
units
$
|
|
|
Deficit
$
|
|
|
Total
shareholders’
equity
$
|
|
Balance
– November 30, 2015
|
|
|
104,796,421
|
|
|
|
136,040
|
|
|
|
2,163
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
17,841
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
(106,902
|
)
|
|
|
50,430
|
|
Restricted Share
Units
|
|
|
108,399
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Deferred Share
Units
|
|
|
218,795
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
143,889
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
Loss
for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,597
|
)
|
|
|
(7,597
|
)
|
Balance
– August 31, 2016
|
|
|
105,267,504
|
|
|
|
136,348
|
|
|
|
2,163
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
18,111
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
(114,499
|
)
|
|
|
43,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
– November 30, 2016
|
|
|
105,286,469
|
|
|
|
136,357
|
|
|
|
2,163
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
18,134
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
(111,764
|
)
|
|
|
46,154
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
171,458
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Restricted Share
Units
|
|
|
209,198
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
Loss
for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14,378
|
)
|
|
|
(14,378
|
)
|
Balance
– August 31, 2017
|
|
|
105,667,125
|
|
|
|
136,494
|
|
|
|
2,163
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
18,392
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
(126,142
|
)
|
|
|
32,289
|
|
(See accompanying
notes to the interim consolidated financial statements)
Trilogy
Metals Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
in
thousands of US dollars
|
|
For
nine months ended
|
|
|
|
August
31, 2017
$
|
|
|
August
31, 2016
$
|
|
Cash
flows used in operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
for the period
|
|
|
(14,378
|
)
|
|
|
(7,597
|
)
|
Items not affecting
cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Loss on disposal of equipment
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss on sale of held for trading
investments
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Unrealized loss on held for trading
investments
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange gain
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
Net change
in non-cash working capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in
accounts receivable
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
(Increase)/decrease
in deposits and prepaid amounts
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
132
|
|
Increase
in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
4,116
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
(9,067
|
)
|
|
|
(6,716
|
)
|
Cash
flows from (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement
of Restricted Share Units
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cash
flows from (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of
plant & equipment
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
Mineral properties
funding (note 4)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from the sale of investments, net of fees
|
|
|
2,180
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
11,971
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
Increase (decrease)
in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
(6,837
|
)
|
Effect
of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents – beginning of period
|
|
|
7,340
|
|
|
|
16,139
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents – end of period
|
|
|
10,205
|
|
|
|
9,302
|
|
Less
cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations – end of period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents of continuing operations – end of period
|
|
|
10,205
|
|
|
|
9,227
|
|
(See accompanying
notes to the interim consolidated financial statements)
Trilogy
Metals Inc.
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Trilogy Metals
Inc., formerly NovaCopper Inc., (“Trilogy”, the “Company”, or “we”) was incorporated in British
Columbia under the
Business Corporations Act (BC)
on April 27, 2011. The Company changed its name from NovaCopper
Inc. to Trilogy Metals Inc. on September 1, 2016 to better reflect its diversified metals resource base. The Company is engaged
in the exploration and development of mineral properties with a focus on the Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects (“UKMP”),
including the Arctic and Bornite Projects located in Northwest Alaska in the United States of America (“US”).
|
2
|
Summary
of significant accounting policies
|
These consolidated financial statements
have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and include
the accounts of Trilogy and its wholly-owned subsidiary, NovaCopper US Inc., doing business as Trilogy Metals US (“Trilogy
Metals US”). These consolidated financial statements included the accounts of Sunward Resources Ltd. (“Sunward”),
Sunward Investments Ltd. (“Sunward Investments”) and Sunward Resources Limited (“Sunward BVI”) for the
period June 19, 2015 to September 1, 2016, inclusive. Sunward BVI has registered a branch, Sunward Resources Sucursal Colombia,
to do business in Colombia. All significant intercompany transactions are eliminated on consolidation.
On June 19, 2015,
we completed the acquisition of Sunward, which held 100% ownership in the Titiribi gold-copper exploration project in Colombia
through Sunward Investments. Sunward was converted to Sunward Resources Unlimited Liability Company on June 19, 2015 and wound-up
on February 29, 2016. On September 1, 2016, we completed the sale of Sunward Investments and the Titiribi project.
The
Company classified the operations of Sunward Investments as discontinued operations, retrospectively.
All figures are
in United States dollars unless otherwise noted. References to CDN$ refer to amounts in Canadian dollars.
The unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for the fair presentation of
our financial position as of August 31, 2017, our results of operations for the three months and nine months ended August 31,
2017 and 2016 and our cash flows for the nine months ended August 31, 2017 and 2016. The results of operations for the three and
nine months ended August 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending November 30,
2017.
As these interim
consolidated financial statements do not contain all of the disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statements,
these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements and
related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2016 filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 3, 2017.
These financial
statements were approved by the Company’s Audit Committee on behalf of the Board of Directors for issue on October 4, 2017.
|
|
Recent accounting
pronouncements
|
|
i.
|
Statement
of cash flows
|
In
November 2016, the FASB issued guidance regarding the presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows (“ASU
2016-18”). This update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is
permitted. The Company has analyzed the impact of the update and determined that the clarification will not affect the Company’s
presentation on its statement of cash flows. The Company early adopted the standard in the second quarter of 2017. As there was
no impact on the Company’s statement of cash flows, there were no changes as a result of adopting the standard.
In February
2016, the FASB issued new accounting requirements for accounting for, presentation of, and classification of leases (“ASU
2016-02”). This will result in most leases being capitalized as a right of use asset with a related liability on our balance
sheets. The requirements of the new standard are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018,
and interim periods within those annual periods, which for us is the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. We expect the adoption
will have an impact as we expect to capitalize leases, specifically our office leases that are not currently recognized on the
balance sheet and are in the process of analyzing the quantitative impact of this guidance on our results of operations and financial
position.
|
iii.
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
In
March 2016, the FASB issued new guidance simplifying the accounting for stock-based compensation transactions, including income
tax consequences, classification of awards as equity or liabilities, forfeitures, and classification on the statement of cash
flows (“ASU 2016-09”). This update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and
early adoption is permitted. The Company has analyzed the impact of the update and determined that the simplification applied
to accounting for forfeitures will affect the results of operations and financial position as it will alter the timing of recognition
of forfeitures. The Company is currently considering its policy choice. The remaining changes in the update do not have an effect
on the Company’s accounting for stock-based compensation.
|
iv.
|
Business
combinations
|
In
January 2017, the FASB issued new guidance to assist in determining if a set of assets and activities being acquired or sold is
a business (“ASU 2017-01”). It also provided a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether both an input and
a substantive process are present, which at a minimum, must be present to be considered a business. This update is effective for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted in most circumstances. It expects
there could be an impact to how the Company accounts for assets acquired in the future.
On September 1,
2016, Trilogy completed the sale to GoldMining Inc. (“GMI”), formerly Brazil Resources Inc., a public company listed
on the TSX-Venture exchange, of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Sunward Investments for consideration of 5,000,000
common shares of GMI valued at $7.8 million and 1,000,000 warrants, with each warrant exercisable into one common share of GMI
for a period of two years at an exercise price of CDN$3.50, valued at $0.3 million, for total consideration of $8.1 million. Of
the common shares received, 2,500,000 common shares were saleable immediately with the remaining 2,500,000 common shares saleable
six months following the close. Sunward Investments, through a subsidiary, owns 100% of the Titiribi gold-copper exploration project.
The common shares
and warrants received have been designated as held-for-trading financial assets, with the classification as current investments
and long-term investments, respectively.
in
thousands of dollars
|
|
August
31, 2017
$
|
|
|
November
30, 2016
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current investments
|
|
|
4,571
|
|
|
|
7,538
|
|
Long-term
investments
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
4,652
|
|
|
|
7,835
|
|
The fair value
of the common shares is determined based on the closing price at each period end. The fair value of the BRI warrants is determined
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model at each period end.
During the nine
months ended August 31, 2017, the Company sold 1,519,000 common shares of GMI during the period for proceeds of $2.2 million and
realized a loss on sale of $0.2 million. For the nine months ended August 31, 2017, the Company recorded an unrealized loss on
the common shares and warrants of GMI of $1.3 million.
|
4
|
Mineral
properties and development costs
|
in thousands
of dollars
|
|
November
30, 2016
$
|
|
|
Acquisition
costs
$
|
|
|
August
31, 2017
$
|
|
Alaska, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ambler (a)
|
|
|
26,586
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
26,587
|
|
Bornite (b)
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
30,586
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
30,587
|
|
in thousands
of dollars
|
|
November
30, 2015
$
|
|
|
Acquisition
costs
$
|
|
|
November 30,
2016
$
|
|
Alaska, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ambler (a)
|
|
|
26,586
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
26,586
|
|
Bornite (b)
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
30,586
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,586
|
|
On January 11, 2010,
NovaGold Resources Inc. (“NovaGold”), through Alaska Gold Company (“AGC”), at the time a wholly-owned
subsidiary, purchased 100% of the Ambler lands in Northwest Alaska, which contains the copper-zinc-lead-gold-silver Arctic Project
and other mineralized targets within the volcanogenic massive sulfide belt, through a series of cash and share payments. Total
fair value of the consideration was $26.6 million. The vendor retained a 1% net smelter return royalty that the owner of
the property can purchase at any time for a one-time payment of $10.0 million.
The Ambler lands were acquired
on October 17, 2011 by Trilogy Metals US through a purchase and sale agreement with AGC. On October 24, 2011,
NovaGold transferred its ownership of Trilogy Metals US to the Company, then a wholly owned subsidiary of NovaGold, which
was subsequently spun-out to NovaGold shareholders and publicly listed on April 30, 2012 (“NovaGold Arrangement”).
On October 19, 2011, Trilogy
Metals US acquired the exclusive right to explore and the non-exclusive right to access and enter on the Bornite lands, and
lands deeded to NANA Regional Corporation, Inc. (“NANA”) through the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, located adjacent
to the Ambler lands in Northwest Alaska. As consideration, Trilogy Metals US paid $4 million to acquire the right
to explore and develop the combined Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects through an Exploration Agreement and Option to Lease with NANA.
Upon a decision to proceed with construction of a mine on the lands, NANA maintains the right to purchase between a 16%-25% ownership
interest in the mine or retain a 15% net proceeds royalty which is payable after Trilogy Metals US has recovered certain
historical costs, including capital and cost of capital. Should NANA elect to purchase an ownership interest, consideration will
be payable equal to all historical costs incurred on the properties at the elected percentage purchased less $40 million,
not to be less than zero. The parties would form a joint venture and be responsible for all future costs, including capital costs
of the mine based on their pro-rata share.
NANA
would also be granted a net smelter return royalty of between 1% and 2.5% upon the execution of a mining lease or a surface use
agreement, the amount of which is determined by the classification of land from which production originates.
On
April 10, 2017, Trilogy and Trilogy Metals US entered into an Option Agreement to Form a Joint Venture with South32 Group Operations
Pty Ltd. (“South32”) on the UKMP (“Option Agreement”). Trilogy Metals
US
has granted South32 the right to form a 50/50 joint venture to hold all of Trilogy Metals US’ Alaskan assets. Upon exercise
of the option, Trilogy Metals US will transfer its Alaskan assets, including the UKMP, and South32 will contribute a minimum of
$150 million to a newly formed limited liability company (“JV LLC”), plus any amounts Trilogy Metals US spends at the
Arctic Project over the next three years to a maximum of $5 million per year (the “Subscription Price”), less an amount
of the initial funding contributed by South32.
To maintain
the option in good standing, South32 is required to fund a minimum of $10 million per year for up to a three year period, which
funds will be used to execute a mutually agreed upon program at the UKMP. The funds provided by South32 may only be expended based
on the approved program. Provided that all the exploration data and information has been made available to South32 by no later
than December 31 of each year, South32 must decide by the end of January of the following year whether: (i) to fund a further
tranche of a minimum of $10 million, or (ii) to withdraw and not provide any further annual funding. If the election to fund a
further tranche is not made in January, South32 has until the end of March to exercise the option to form the JV LLC and make
the subscription payment.
The
Company received $10.0 million for the first payment following the approval of the year 1 program and budget in April 2017. As
at August 31, 2017, the Company held $2.7 million in a segregated bank account for spending on the approved year 1 program at
Bornite. The Company is responsible for the disbursement of these funds in accordance with the approved program and budget and
accordingly has not classified the funds as restricted cash.
As the
initial option payments are credited against the future subscription price upon exercise, the Company has accounted for the payment
received as deferred consideration. At such time as the option is exercised, the initial payments received to that date will be
recognized as part of the consideration received for the Company’s contribution of the UKMP into the JV LLC. If South 32
withdraws from the Option Agreement, the consideration will be recognized in the statement of loss at that time.
The
option to form the JV LLC is recognized as a financial instrument at inception of the arrangement with an initial fair value of
$nil. This option is required to be re-measured at fair value at each reporting date with any changes in fair value recorded in
loss for the period.
|
(d)
|
Mineral
properties expense
|
The
following table summarizes mineral properties expense for the noted periods and includes expenditures funded by South32.
In thousands
of dollars
|
|
Three
months
ended August
31, 2017
$
|
|
|
Three
months
ended August
31, 2016
$
|
|
|
Nine
months
ended August
31, 2017
$
|
|
|
Nine
months
ended August
31, 2016
$
|
|
Alaska,
USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
3,194
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
Engineering
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
Geochemistry and
geophysics
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Land and permitting
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Project support
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
2,641
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
Wages
and benefits
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
Mineral
property expense
|
|
|
8,471
|
|
|
|
3,077
|
|
|
|
10,407
|
|
|
|
4,067
|
|
Mineral
property expenses consist of direct drilling, personnel, community, resource reporting and other exploration expenses as outlined
above, as well as indirect project support expenses such as fixed wing charters, helicopter support, fuel, and other camp operation
costs. Cumulative mineral properties expense in Alaska from the initial earn-in agreement on the property in 2004 to August 31,
2017 is $73.4 million and cumulative acquisition costs are $30.6 million totaling $104.0 million spent to date.
|
5
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
in thousands
of dollars
|
|
August
31, 2017
$
|
|
|
November
30, 2016
$
|
|
Trade
accounts payable
|
|
|
2,179
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,494
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
Accrued
salaries and vacation
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
Authorized:
unlimited
common shares, no par value
in thousands
of dollars, except share amounts
|
|
Number
of shares
|
|
|
Ascribed
value
$
|
|
November 30,
2015
|
|
|
104,796,421
|
|
|
|
136,040
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
162,854
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Restricted Share
Units
|
|
|
108,399
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Deferred
Share Units
|
|
|
218,795
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
November 30,
2016
|
|
|
105,286,469
|
|
|
|
136,357
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
171,458
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Restricted
Share Units
|
|
|
209,198
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
August
31, 2017, issued and outstanding
|
|
|
105,667,125
|
|
|
|
136,494
|
|
On April 30,
2012, under the NovaGold Arrangement, Trilogy committed to issue common shares, once vested, to satisfy holders of deferred share
units (“NovaGold DSUs”) on record as of the close of business April 27, 2012. When vested, Trilogy committed to deliver
one common share to the holder for every six shares of NovaGold the holder is entitled to receive, rounded down to the nearest
whole number. As of August 31, 2017, 20,685 NovaGold DSUs remain outstanding representing a right to receive 3,447 common shares
in Trilogy, which will settle upon certain directors retiring from NovaGold’s board.
During the nine
month period ended August 31, 2017, 1,695,000 options (August 31, 2016 – 1,785,000 options) at a weighted-average exercise
price of CDN$0.72 (August 31, 2016 – CDN$0.44) were granted to employees, consultants and directors exercisable for a period
of five years with various vesting terms between nil and two years. The weighted-average fair value attributable to options granted
in the period was $0.22 per option.
For the nine month
period ended August 31, 2017, Trilogy recognized a stock-based compensation charge of $0.31 million (August 31, 2016–
$0.33 million) for options granted to directors, employees and service providers, net of forfeitures.
The fair value
of the stock options recognized in the period has been estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Assumptions used
in the pricing model for the period are as provided below.
|
|
August
31, 2017
|
|
Risk-free
interest rates
|
|
|
0.89
|
%
|
Exercise price
|
|
|
CDN$0.72
|
|
Expected life
|
|
|
3.0
years
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
74.3
|
%
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
As of August 31,
2017, there were 1,405,843 non-vested options outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $0.48; the non-vested stock
option expense not yet recognized was $0.1 million. This expense is expected to be recognized over the next two years.
A summary of the
Company’s stock option plan and changes during the nine month period ended is as follows:
|
|
August
31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Number
of options
|
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise price
$
|
|
Balance
– beginning of period
|
|
|
6,049,433
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,695,000
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(362,477
|
)
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(169,329
|
)
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
Balance
– end of period
|
|
|
7,212,627
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
The following table
summarizes information about the stock options outstanding at August 31, 2017.
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
Range
of price
|
|
Number
of
outstanding
options
|
|
|
Weighted
average
years to
expiry
|
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
$
|
|
|
Number
of
exercisable
options
|
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
$
|
|
|
Number
of
unvested
options
|
|
$0.35 to $0.50
|
|
|
4,267,627
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
3,588,457
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
679,170
|
|
$0.51 to $1.00
|
|
|
2,890,000
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
2,163,327
|
|
|
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
726,673
|
|
$1.01 to $1.47
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
0.67
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
7,212,627
|
|
|
|
3.07
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
5,806,784
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
1,405,843
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic
value of vested share options (the market value less the exercise price) at August 31, 2017 was $2.8 million (August 31, 2016
- $0.49 million) and the aggregate intrinsic value of exercised options for the nine months ended August 31, 2017 was $0.15 million
(August 31, 2016 - $0.09 million).
|
(b)
|
NovaGold
Arrangement Options
|
Under the NovaGold
Arrangement, holders of NovaGold stock options received one option in Trilogy for every six options held in NovaGold (“NovaGold
Arrangement Options”). All NovaGold Arrangement Options remaining expired during the nine months ended August 31, 2017.
A summary of the
NovaGold Arrangement Options and changes during the nine month period ended is as follows:
|
|
August
31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Number
of options
|
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise price
$
|
|
Balance
– beginning of period
|
|
|
312,195
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(312,195
|
)
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
Balance
– end of period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(c)
|
Restricted
Share Units and Deferred Share Units
|
The Company has
a Restricted Share Unit Plan (“RSU Plan”) and a Non-Executive Director Deferred Share Unit Plan (“DSU Plan”)
to provide long-term incentives to employees, officers and directors. The RSU Plan and DSU Plan may be settled in cash and/or
Common Shares at the Company’s election with each RSU and DSU entitling the holder to receive one common share of the Company
or equivalent value. All units are accounted for as equity-settled awards.
A summary of the
Company’s unit plans and changes during the nine month period ended August 31, 2017 is as follows:
|
|
Number
of RSUs
|
|
|
Number
of DSUs
|
|
Balance
– beginning of period
|
|
|
400,001
|
|
|
|
925,390
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
98,554
|
|
Vested/paid
|
|
|
(399,999
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance
– end of period
|
|
|
600,002
|
|
|
|
1,023,944
|
|
For the nine months
ended August 31, 2017, Trilogy recognized a stock-based compensation charge of $0.29 million (August 31, 2016- $0.22 million),
net of forfeitures.
On December 15,
2016, 600,000 RSUs were granted to officers vesting one third immediately, one third on the first anniversary of the grant date,
and one third on the second anniversary. On December 23, 2016, 399,999 RSUs vested and were settled through the issuance of 209,198
shares and a cash payment of $90,000 to cover tax withholdings.
|
(d)
|
Share
Purchase Warrants
|
A summary of the
Company’s warrants and changes during the nine months ended August 31, 2017 is as follows:
|
|
Number
of
Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted
average years to
expiry
|
|
|
Weighted
average exercise
price
$
|
|
Balance
– beginning of period
|
|
|
6,521,740
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
Balance
– end of period
|
|
|
6,521,740
|
|
|
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
The Company is
exposed to a variety of risks arising from financial instruments. These risks and management’s objectives, policies and
procedures for managing these risks are disclosed as follows.
The Company’s
financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, deposits, investments, and accounts payable and
accrued liabilities. The fair value of the Company’s financial instruments approximates their carrying value due to the
short-term nature of their maturity. The Company’s financial instruments initially measured at fair value and then held
at amortized cost include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, deposits, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
The Company’s investments are held for trading and are marked-to-market at each period end with changes in fair value recorded
to the statement of loss. The South32 purchase option is a derivative financial liability measured at fair value with changes
in value recorded to the statement of loss.
|
|
Financial
risk management
|
The Company’s
activities expose them to certain financial risks, including currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, interest risk and price
risk.
Currency risk is the risk of a fluctuation
in financial asset and liability settlement amounts due to a change in foreign exchange rates. The Company operates in the United
States and Canada. The Company’s exposure to currency risk at August 31, 2017 is limited to Canadian dollar balances consisting
of cash of CDN$2,596,000, accounts receivable of CDN$421,000, deposit amounts of CDN$116,000, investments of CDN$5,833,000 and
accounts payable of CDN$859,000. Based on a 10% change in the US-Canadian exchange rate, assuming all other variables remain constant,
the Company’s net loss would change by approximately $647,000.
Credit risk is
the risk of an unexpected loss if a customer or third party to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations.
The Company holds cash and cash equivalents with Canadian Chartered financial institutions. The Company’s accounts receivable
consist of GST receivable from the Federal Government of Canada and other receivables for recoverable expenses. The Company’s
exposure to credit risk is equal to the balance of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable as recorded in the financial
statements.
Liquidity risk
is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulties raising funds to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The
Company is in the exploration stage and does not have cash inflows from operations; therefore, the Company manages liquidity risk
through the management of its capital structure and financial leverage. Management does expect to monetize its investments held
over the next year to assist in meeting its operational requirements. Future financings are anticipated through the sale of investments,
equity financing, the exercise of mineral properties option, debt financing, convertible debt, or other means.
Contractually obligated
cash flow requirements as at August 31, 2017 are as follows.
in thousands
of dollars
|
|
Total
$
|
|
|
<
1 Year
$
|
|
|
1–2
Years
$
|
|
|
2–5
Years
$
|
|
|
Thereafter
$
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Office
lease (note 8)
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
|
6,108
|
|
|
|
4,803
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
On February 21,
2017, the Company entered into a lease for office space effective July 1, 2017 for a period of seven years with a total commitment
of $1.3 million.
Interest rate risk
is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest
rates. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk with respect to interest earned on cash and cash equivalents. Based on balances
as at August 31, 2017, a 1% change in interest rates would result in a change in net loss of $0.1 million, assuming all other
variables remain constant.
As we are currently
in the exploration phase none of our financial instruments are exposed to commodity price risk; however, our ability to obtain
long-term financing and its economic viability could be affected by commodity price volatility.
Financial instruments
measured at fair value are classified into one of three levels in the fair value hierarchy according to the significance of the
inputs used in making the measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level
1
— Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted
assets or liabilities;
Level
2
— Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for
substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and
Level
3
— Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable
(supported by little or no market activity)
The levels in the
fair value hierarchy into which the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair
value on a recurring basis were categorized as follows:
in thousands
of dollars
|
|
August
31, 2017
$
|
|
|
November
30, 2016
$
|
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
Current
investments – shares
|
|
|
4,571
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,538
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Investments –
warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
South32 purchase
option
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
The Company’s
investments consist of shares and warrants in a publicly-held mining company. The share investments are recorded as current investments
and are valued using quoted market prices in active markets and as such are classified as a Level 1 financial instrument. The
warrants are valued using a Black-Scholes pricing model and are considered a Level 3 financial instrument because the valuation
models have significant unobservable inputs.
The South32 purchase
option received is recorded at fair value. As the inputs to valuing the purchase option are significant to the measurement of
the option and are unobservable, it is considered a Level 3 financial instrument.
The Company has
commitments in respect of office leases requiring future minimum lease payments as follows:
in thousands
of dollars
|
|
August
31, 2017
$
|
|
2017
|
|
|
44
|
|
2018
|
|
|
178
|
|
2019
|
|
|
184
|
|
2020
|
|
|
193
|
|
2021
|
|
|
203
|
|
2022-2024
|
|
|
547
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
Cautionary
notes
|
|
Forward-looking
statements
|
This Management’s
Discussion and Analysis contains “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” within
the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Canadian securities laws. These forward-looking statements may include
statements regarding outlook, perceived merit of properties, exploration results and budgets, mineral reserves and resource estimates,
work programs, capital expenditures, operating costs, cash flow estimates, production estimates and similar statements relating
to the economic viability of a project, timelines, strategic plans, statements relating to anticipated activity with respect to
the Ambler Mining District Industrial Access Project, including the Company’s plans and expectations relating to its Upper
Kobuk Mineral Projects, the adequacy of the funds paid by South32 under the Option Agreement including pursuant to the exercise
of the option to fund the UKMP through to feasibility and permitting of the first mine, the exercise of the option by South32,
market prices for precious and base metals, or other statements that are not statements of fact. These statements relate to analyses
and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions
of management. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute “forward-looking statements”
to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the property is developed.
Any statements
that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions
or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is
expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”,
“assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”,
“possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”,
“could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be
achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking
statements.
Forward-looking
statements are based on a number of material assumptions, including those listed below, which could prove to be significantly
incorrect:
|
·
|
assumptions
made in the interpretation of drill results, and of the geology, grade, and continuity
of the Company’s mineral deposits;
|
|
·
|
our
ability to achieve production at any of the Company’s mineral exploration and development
properties;
|
|
·
|
our
expected ability to develop adequate infrastructure and that the cost of doing so will
be reasonable;
|
|
·
|
assumptions
that all necessary permits and governmental approvals will be obtained;
|
|
·
|
estimated
capital costs, operating costs, production and economic returns;
|
|
·
|
estimated
metal pricing, metallurgy, mineability, marketability and operating and capital costs,
together with other assumptions underlying the Company’s resource and reserve estimates;
|
|
·
|
continued
good relationships with local communities and other stakeholders;
|
|
·
|
our
expectations regarding demand for equipment, skilled labour and services needed for exploration
and development of mineral properties;
|
|
·
|
assumptions
regarding the merit of litigation; and
|
|
·
|
that
our activities will not be adversely disrupted or impeded by development, operating or
regulatory risks.
|
Forward-looking
statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events
or results to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:
|
·
|
risks
related to the inability to define proven and probable reserves;
|
|
·
|
risks
related to our ability to finance the development of our mineral properties through external
financing, strategic alliances, the sale of property interests or otherwise;
|
|
·
|
none
of the Company’s mineral properties are in production or are under development;
|
|
·
|
uncertainties
relating to the assumptions underlying our resource estimates, such as metal pricing,
metallurgy, mineability, marketability and operating and capital costs;
|
|
·
|
risks
related to lack of infrastructure including but not limited to the risk whether or not
the Ambler Mining District Industrial Access Project (“AMDIAP”) will receive
the requisite permits and, if it does, whether Alaska Industrial Development and Export
Authority will build the AMDIAP;
|
|
·
|
uncertainty
as to whether there will ever be production at the Company’s mineral exploration
and development properties;
|
|
·
|
uncertainty
as to estimates of capital costs, operating costs, production and economic returns;
|
|
·
|
risks
related to our ability to commence production and generate material revenues or obtain
adequate financing for our planned exploration and development activities;
|
|
·
|
risks
related to future sales or issuances of equity securities decreasing the value of existing
Trilogy common shares, diluting voting power and reducing future earnings per share;
|
|
·
|
risks
related to market events and general economic conditions;
|
|
·
|
uncertainty
related to inferred mineral resources;
|
|
·
|
uncertainty
related to the economic projections contained herein derived from the Preliminary Economic
Assessment titled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Report on the Arctic Project,
Ambler Mining District, Northwest Alaska” dated effective September 12, 2013;
|
|
·
|
risks
related to inclement weather which may delay or hinder exploration activities at its
mineral properties;
|
|
·
|
risks
and uncertainties relating to the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade,
and continuity of our mineral deposits;
|
|
·
|
mining
and development risks, including risks related to infrastructure, accidents, equipment
breakdowns, labor disputes or other unanticipated difficulties with or interruptions
in development, construction or production;
|
|
·
|
the
risk that permits and governmental approvals necessary to develop and operate mines at
our mineral properties will not be available on a timely basis or at all;
|
|
·
|
commodity
price fluctuations;
|
|
·
|
risks
related to governmental regulation and permits, including environmental regulation, including
the risk that more stringent requirements or standards may be adopted or applied due
to circumstances unrelated to the Company and outside of its control;
|
|
·
|
risks
related to the need for reclamation activities on our properties and uncertainty of cost
estimates related thereto;
|
|
·
|
uncertainty
related to title to our mineral properties;
|
|
·
|
our
history of losses and expectation of future losses;
|
|
·
|
risks
related to increases in demand for equipment, skilled labor and services needed for exploration
and development of mineral properties, and related cost increases;
|
|
·
|
our
need to attract and retain qualified management and technical personnel;
|
|
·
|
risks
related to conflicts of interests of some of our directors;
|
|
·
|
risks
related to potential future litigation;
|
|
·
|
risks
related to the voting power of our major shareholders and the impact that a sale by such
shareholders may have on our share price;
|
|
·
|
risks
related to global climate change;
|
|
·
|
risks
related to adverse publicity from non-governmental organizations;
|
|
·
|
uncertainty
as to the volatility in the price of the Company’s shares;
|
|
·
|
the
Company’s expectation of not paying cash dividends;
|
|
·
|
adverse
federal income tax consequences for U.S. shareholders should the Company be a passive
foreign investment company;
|
|
·
|
uncertainty
as to our ability to maintain the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting
as per the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; and
|
|
·
|
increased
regulatory compliance costs, associated with rules and regulations promulgated by the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), Canadian Securities
Administrators, the NYSE American, the TSX, and the Financial Accounting Standards Boards,
and more specifically, our efforts to comply with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act.
|
This list is
not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements
are statements about the future and are inherently uncertain, and actual achievements of the Company or other future events or
conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties
and other factors, including, without limitation, those referred to in Trilogy’s Form 10-K dated February 2, 2017, filed
with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and the SEC, and other information released by Trilogy and filed with the
appropriate regulatory agencies.
The Company’s
forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, expectations, and opinions of management on the date the statements are made,
and the Company does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management’s beliefs,
expectations or opinions should change, except as required by law. For the reasons set forth above, investors should not place
undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
|
|
Cautionary
note to United States investors
|
|
|
Reserve and
resource estimates
|
This Management’s Discussion
and Analysis has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ
from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. Unless otherwise indicated, all resource and reserve estimates included in
this Management’s Discussion and Analysis have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and the 2014 Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy,
and Petroleum Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian
Securities Administrators which establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical
information concerning mineral projects. Canadian standards, including NI 43-101, differ significantly from the requirements
of the SEC, and resource and reserve information contained herein may not be comparable to similar information disclosed by
U.S. companies. In particular, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term “resource” does not
equate to the term “reserves”. Under U.S. standards, mineralization may not be classified as a
“reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally
produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. The SEC’s disclosure standards normally do not
permit the inclusion of information concerning “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral
resources” or “inferred mineral resources” or other descriptions of the amount of mineralization in mineral
deposits that do not constitute “reserves” by U.S. standards in documents filed with the SEC. Investors are
cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.
U.S. investors should also understand that an “inferred mineral resource” has a lower level of confidence than
an “indicated mineral resource” and must not be converted to a mineral “reserve”. It is reasonably
expected that the majority of “inferred mineral resources” could be upgraded to “indicated mineral
resources” with continued exploration. Under Canadian rules, estimated “inferred mineral resources” may not
form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies except in rare cases. Disclosure of
“contained ounces” in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC
normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC standards as
in-place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. The requirements of NI 43-101 for identification of
“reserves” are also not the same as those of the SEC, and reserves reported by the Company in compliance with NI
43-101 may not qualify as “reserves” under SEC standards. Accordingly, information concerning mineral deposits
set forth herein may not be comparable with information made public by companies that report in accordance with U.S.
standards.
General
This Management’s Discussion and
Analysis (“MD&A”) of Trilogy Metals Inc. (“Trilogy”, “Trilogy Metals”, “the Company”
or “we”) is dated October 4, 2017 and provides an analysis of our unaudited interim financial results for the quarter
ended August 31, 2017 compared to the quarter ended August 31, 2016.
The following information
should be read in conjunction with our August 31, 2017 unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes which
were prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The MD&A
should also be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended November 30, 2016.
A summary of the U.S. GAAP accounting policies are outlined in note 2 of the audited consolidated financial statements
and note 2 of the interim consolidated financial statements. All amounts are in United States dollars unless otherwise stated.
References to “Canadian dollars” and “C$” and “CDN$” are to the currency of Canada and references
to “U.S. dollars”, “$” or “US$” are to the currency of the United States.
Andrew W. West,
P.Geo., an employee and Exploration Manager for Trilogy, is a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 -
Standards
of Disclosure for Mineral Projects
(“NI 43-101”), and has approved the scientific and technical information in
this MD&A.
Trilogy’s shares are listed on the
Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) and the NYSE-American under the symbol “TMQ”. Additional information related
to Trilogy, including our annual report on Form 10-K, is available on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com
and on EDGAR at
www.sec.gov
.
Description
of business
We are a base metals exploration company
focused on exploring and developing our mineral holdings in the Ambler mining district located in Alaska, U.S.A. We conduct our
operations through a wholly-owned subsidiary, Trilogy Metals US. Our Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects, (“UKMP” or “UKMP
Projects”), consist of: i) the 100% owned Ambler lands which host the Arctic copper-zinc-lead-gold-silver Project (the “Arctic
Project”); and ii) the Bornite lands being explored under a collaborative long-term agreement with NANA Regional Corporation,
Inc. (“NANA”), a regional Alaska Native Corporation, which host the Bornite carbonate-hosted copper Project (the “Bornite
Project”).
Project
activities
The focus of this third fiscal quarter
has been working to advance our projects. With a combined 2017 budget of $17.1 million for the Bornite and Arctic Projects, this
quarter was busy at our remote project sites in northwest Alaska.
Bornite Project
We are currently executing a $10 million
exploration program at the Bornite Project, funded by South32 Group Operations Pty Ltd., a subsidiary of South32 Limited (ASX/JSE/LSE:
S32), (“South32”) under an Option Agreement on the UKMP entered into on April 10, 2017 (“Option Agreement”).
The focus of this year’s program is to target high-grade copper mineralization north and east of the previously identified
resources which were last drilled by us in 2013 and to define the edges of the mineralized system. This year’s exploration
at Bornite was approved by a joint Trilogy-South32 Technical Committee.
Under the terms of the Option Agreement,
Trilogy Metals US granted South32 the right to form a 50/50 joint venture to hold all of the Company’s Alaskan assets currently
held directly by Trilogy Metals US. Upon exercise of the option, Trilogy Metals US will transfer its Alaskan assets, including
the UKMP, and South32 will contribute a minimum of $150 million, subject to certain adjustments, to a newly formed and jointly
held, limited liability company.
To maintain the option in good standing,
South32 is required to fund a minimum of $10 million per year for up to a three year period, which funds will be used to execute
a mutually agreed upon program at the UKMP. South32 may exercise its option at any time over the next three years to enter into
the 50/50 joint venture. Provided that all the exploration data and information has been made available to South32 by no later
than December 31 of each year, South32 must decide by the end of January of the following year whether: (i) to fund a further tranche
of a minimum of $10 million, or (ii) to withdraw and not provide any further annual funding. If the election to fund a further
tranche is not made in January, South32 has until the end of March to exercise the option to form the LLC and make the subscription
payment.
This year’s
exploration program at Bornite is one of the larger programs in the history of drilling at the Bornite Project. With an approved
budget of $10 million, we will be drilling approximately 9,000 meters at Bornite this field season to test the extension of the
mineralization from the drill holes from our 2013 drill campaign along with a ground gravity survey, continuation of hydrology
data collection and initiating metallurgy and acid based accounting for Bornite.
Drilling at the
Bornite Project began in early June and is expected to be finished in early October with results released throughout the fall.
We completed 6,037 meters by August 31, 2017 and released our first results on September 18, 2017 from the first three holes comprising
3,083 meters.
Arctic Project
In early June 2017,
we announced the engagement of Ausenco Engineering Canada Inc. to prepare the Arctic Project PFS technical report anticipated
to be complete in Q1 2018. The Company has also engaged Amec Foster Wheeler to complete mine planning and SRK Consulting (Canada)
Inc. to complete tailings and waste design, hydrology and environmental studies.
The summer field program for the Arctic
Project PFS was conducted in July with the completion of 257 meters of geotechnical drilling and 26 test pits completed to determine
site facility locations and mine design. We also completed geophysical ground surveys to evaluate ground conditions. We continued
our environmental baseline program through the summer of 2017 which includes baseline data collection on aquatic and avian resources,
ongoing water quality, hydrology and meteorology. The water quality program was expanded in 2017 to include additional sample locations
and increased sample frequency.
The results from
this summer’s field program are currently being compiled and analyzed by the PFS consultants. The timing of the field program
will provide the information required for completion of the PFS anticipated to be in Q1 2018.
We also completed 455 meters of infill
drilling at Arctic in late August collecting core to provide two tonnes of material for an ore-sorting study to be initiated in
Q4 2017.
Outlook
Our 2017 program
has a total budget of $17.1 million with $7.1 million to be expended during the fiscal year to advance the Arctic Project to pre-feasibility
and $10.0 million for the exploration program at the Bornite Project. The Arctic Project PFS will be supported by information
collected during the 2015 - 2017 field seasons. The completion of our 2017 field program has completed a staged three-year site
investigation program where the first two years focused almost exclusively on collecting data in and around the proposed Arctic
open-pit, and the third year focused on infrastructure and mine design. The Arctic Project PFS is anticipated to be completed
in Q1 2018.
The exploration
program at the Bornite Project is an opportunity to potentially expand the size of the Bornite deposit by drilling the extensions
of mineralization last drilled by the Company in 2013. Approximately 9,000 meters will be drilled at Bornite which drilling will
be focused entirely on testing the size and depth of the extension of the known deposit. Drilling at the Bornite Project commenced
in early June and will continue through to early October with drill results anticipated to be released through the fall. Initial
drill results were released on September 18, 2017 on the first three drill holes.
Property
review
Our principal
assets, the UKMP Projects, are located in the Ambler mining district in Northwest Alaska. Our UKMP Projects comprise approximately
355,385 acres (143,819 hectares) consisting of the Ambler and Bornite lands.
Arctic Project
The Ambler lands, which host a number of
deposits, including the high-grade copper-zinc-lead-gold-silver Arctic Project, and other mineralized targets within a 100 kilometer
long volcanogenic massive sulfide (“VMS”) belt, are owned by Trilogy Metals US. The Ambler lands are located in Northwestern
Alaska and consist of 114,500 acres (46,337 hectares) of Federal patented mining claims and State of Alaska mining claims,
within which VMS mineralization has been found.
We have recorded
the Ambler lands as a mineral property with acquisition costs capitalized and exploration costs expensed in accordance with our
accounting policies.
Bornite Project
On October 19, 2011, Trilogy Metals
US and NANA signed a collaborative agreement to explore and develop the Ambler mining district. Under the Exploration Agreement
and Option to Lease (the “NANA Agreement”), we acquired, in exchange for, among other things, a $4.0 million cash payment
to NANA, the exclusive right to explore the Bornite property and lands deeded to NANA through the Alaska Native Claims Settlement
Act (“ANCSA”), located adjacent to the Arctic Project, and the non-exclusive right to access and entry onto NANA’s
lands. The agreement establishes a framework for any future development of either the Bornite Project or the Arctic Project. Both
projects are included as part of a larger area of interest set forth in the NANA Agreement. The agreement with NANA created a total
land package incorporating our Ambler lands with the adjacent Bornite and ANCSA lands with a total area of approximately 355,385
acres (143,819 hectares).
Upon the decision
to proceed with development of a mine within the area of interest, NANA maintains the right to purchase an ownership interest
in the mine equal to between 16%-25% or retain a 15% net proceeds royalty which is payable after we have recovered certain historical
costs, including capital and cost of capital. Should NANA elect to purchase an ownership interest in the mine, consideration will
be payable based on the elected percentage purchased and all the costs incurred on the properties less $40.0 million, not
to be less than zero. The parties would form a joint venture and be responsible for all future costs incurred in connection with
the mine, including capital costs of the mine, based on each party’s pro-rata share.
NANA would also
be granted a net smelter return royalty between 1% and 2.5% upon the execution of a mining lease or a surface use agreement, the
amount of which is determined by the particular area of land from which production originates.
We have accounted
for the Bornite property as a mineral property with acquisition costs capitalized and exploration costs expensed in accordance
with our accounting policies.
Summary
of results
in thousands
of dollars,
except
for per share amounts
|
|
Three
months ended
|
|
|
Nine
months ended
|
|
Selected
expenses
|
|
August
31,
2017
$
|
|
|
August
31,
2016
$
|
|
|
August
31,
2017
$
|
|
|
August
31,
2016
$
|
|
Foreign exchange
(gain) loss
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
Mineral properties expense
|
|
|
8,471
|
|
|
|
3,077
|
|
|
|
10,407
|
|
|
|
4,067
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
Salaries
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
Salaries – stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
Unrealized loss on held for
trading investments
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
for the period
|
|
|
8,992
|
|
|
|
3,902
|
|
|
|
14,378
|
|
|
|
6,885
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
Loss and comprehensive loss
for the period
|
|
|
8,992
|
|
|
|
4,255
|
|
|
|
14,378
|
|
|
|
7,597
|
|
Basic and
diluted loss per common share
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
For the three months
ended August 31, 2017, Trilogy reported a net loss of $9.0 million (or $0.09 basic and diluted loss per common share) compared
to a net loss of $4.3 million for the corresponding period in 2016 (or $0.04 basic and diluted loss per common share). This variance
of $4.7 million was primarily due to the size of the field programs at the UKMP in 2017 as well as the timing of the program.
An increase of $5.4 million in mineral property expenses incurred during the three months ended August 31, 2017 compared to the
three months ended August 31, 2016 accounted for the increase in its entirety. The 2017 program consists of a $10.0 million exploration
program at the Bornite Project, funded by South32, and a $7.1 million program towards completing a pre-feasibility study at the
Arctic Project expected to be completed in Q1 2018. Comparably, in 2016, the field program consisted of a drill program at Arctic
to prepare the project for pre-feasibility work. The field program in 2017 began in late May and continued through the third quarter.
In 2016, the field program consisted of a 45-day program that wrapped up in late July. The increase in the mineral property expenses
is due to the size and variety of the programs being undertaken. The increase was offset by slight decreases in general and administrative,
salaries and stock-based compensation expense during the three months ended August 31, 2017 compared to the three months ended
August 31, 2016.
Trilogy recognized
a gain on foreign exchange during the three months ended August 31, 2017 of $0.6 million due to the appreciation of the Canadian
dollar in the current fiscal year. We were holding a higher average volume of cash and cash equivalents in Canadian dollars during
the third quarter of 2017 mainly due to the sale of investments which consist of shares in Gold Mining Inc. (“GMI”).
The investments are also denominated in Canadian dollars and benefited from the appreciation of the Canadian dollar in the third
quarter. We acquired the investments on September 1, 2016 as consideration for the sale of Sunward Investments Limited (“Sunward”)
and its Titiribi gold-copper exploration project in Colombia. As such, a comparable foreign currency movement did not exist in
the third quarter of 2016. There was also a loss from discontinued operations of $0.4 million for the three months ended August
31, 2016 which relates to the sale of Sunward. There is no comparable amount in the current fiscal year as the sale was completed
on September 1, 2016. Other minor differences noted for the comparable periods were i) a small decrease in general and administrative
expenses; ii) a small decrease in salaries due to lower level of staff in the third quarter of 2017 compared to 2016; and iii)
a small decrease in stock-based compensation due to the timing of the amortization of expense.
The basic and diluted
loss per common share of $0.09 for the three months ended August 31, 2017 increased from the basic and diluted loss per common
share of $0.04 for the three months ended August 31, 2016 due to the increased loss as described above.
For the nine months ended August 31, 2017,
Trilogy reported a net loss of $14.4 million (or $0.14 basic and diluted loss per common share) compared to a net loss of $7.6
million for the corresponding period in 2016 (or $0.07 basic and diluted loss per common share). The increase in net loss is primarily
due to an increase in mineral property expense of $6.3 million from $4.1 million for the nine months ended August 31, 2016 to $10.4
million for the nine months ended August 31, 2017. Similarly to the variance in the three-month periods, the field program being
executed in 2017 is significantly larger and more varied than the field program completed in 2016. The variance is also due to
an unrealized loss on investments on the GMI securities of $1.3 million classified as held for trading for which changes in the
fair value of the investments are recorded through the statement of loss. There are no comparable amounts for the nine months ended
August 31, 2016 as the Company acquired the investments in September 2016.
Trilogy recognized a gain on foreign exchange
during the nine months ended August 31, 2017 of $0.5 million due to the appreciation of the Canadian dollar in the current quarter
as well as the volume of funds held in Canadian dollars. There is no comparable amount in 2016 due to the timing of acquiring the
GMI investments. Additionally, there was a loss from discontinued operations of $0.7 million for the nine months ended August 31,
2016 from the operations of Sunward for which there is no comparable amount in 2017. Other minor differences noted for the comparable
periods were i) a small increase in general and administrative expenses; ii) a small decrease in professional fees due to a lower
level of corporate activity compared to 2016, iii) a small decrease in salaries due to lower level of staff in the third quarter
of 2017 compared to 2016; and iv) a small increase in stock-based compensation due to increasing Black-Scholes valuations from
an increased share price.
The basic and diluted
loss per common share of $0.14 for the nine months ended August 31, 2017 increased from the basic and diluted loss per common
share of $0.07 for the nine months ended August 31, 2016 due to the increased loss as described above.
Selected
financial data
Quarterly
information
in thousands
of dollars,
except
per share amounts
|
|
Q3
2017
|
|
|
Q2
2017
|
|
|
Q1
2017
|
|
|
Q4
2016
|
|
|
Q3
2016
|
|
|
Q2
2016
|
|
|
Q1
2016
|
|
|
Q4
2015
|
|
|
|
08/31/17
$
|
|
|
05/31/17
$
|
|
|
02/28/17
$
|
|
|
11/30/16
$
|
|
|
08/31/16
$
|
|
|
05/31/16
$
|
|
|
02/29/16
$
|
|
|
11/30/15
$
|
|
Interest and other
income
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Mineral property expenses
|
|
|
8,471
|
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
3,077
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,561
|
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) for the period
|
|
|
(8,992
|
)
|
|
|
(2,390
|
)
|
|
|
(2,996
|
)
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
(4,255
|
)
|
|
|
(1,648
|
)
|
|
|
(1,695
|
)
|
|
|
(2,090
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per common share
– basic and diluted
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(
0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Factors that can
cause fluctuations in our quarterly results include the length of the exploration field season at the properties, the type of
program conducted, stock option vesting, and issuance of shares. Other factors that have caused fluctuations in the quarterly
results that would not be expected to re-occur include the acquisition and disposition of Sunward and financing activities.
Our net loss for
the fourth quarter of 2015 of $2.1 million consists of $0.8 million in mineral property expenses incurred for assay costs and
engineering studies conducted in the fall as well as $0.2 million in discontinued operation costs from Sunward.
Our loss for the
first quarter ended February 29, 2016 is comparable to typical first quarter losses in that it consists mainly of mineral property
expenses relating to engineering studies completed in advance of the 2016 field program. The loss is increased slightly due to
costs related to operating Sunward of $0.2 million when compared to periods when Trilogy did not own Sunward. During the second
quarter of 2016, we incurred $0.5 million in mineral property expenses due to the field season starting up in the last month of
the second quarter and $0.2 million in discontinued operations relating to Sunward. During the third quarter of 2016, we incurred
mineral property expenses of $3.1 million as we completed our drilling program. As a result, our loss for the third quarter ended
August 31, 2016 is higher compared to previous quarter losses and consistent with the spending in the third quarter of 2015. We
recognized earnings for the fourth quarter of 2016 of $2.7 million due to the gain on the sale of Sunward. Adjusted for the discontinued
operations, the fourth quarter periods are substantially comparable.
Our loss for the
first quarter ended February 28, 2017 of $3.0 million is significantly increased compared to prior quarterly periods due to an
unrealized loss on held for trading investments of $1.2 million. The investments are classified as held for trading and changes
in the fair value of the investments are recorded through the statement of loss. Our loss for the second quarter ended May 31,
2017 of $2.4 million is significantly increased from the comparable period due to a significant increase is the size of our field
program resulting in increased mineral property expenses of $1.3 million. Similarly, our loss for the third quarter ended August
31, 2017 of $9.0 million is significantly increased from the comparable loss of $4.3 million in the third quarter ended August
31, 2016 due to the size of the 2017 field program which is more than double the 2016 field program.
Liquidity
and capital resources
At August 31, 2017,
we had $10.2 million in cash and cash equivalents. We expended $9.1 million on operating activities during the nine months
ended August 31, 2017 compared with $6.7 million for operating activities for the same period in 2016. The majority of cash spent
on operating activities during all periods was expended on mineral property expenses. Other operating expenses consisted of cash
spent on general and administrative costs, salaries, professional fees and investor relations. At August 31, 2017, the Company
had working capital available of $11.2 million. As at August 31, 2017, the Company continues to manage its cash expenditures and
management believes that the working capital available is sufficient to meet its operational requirements for the next year. Management
does expect to monetize its current investments by selling shares of GMI in the next six months to assist in meeting its operational
requirements. Future financings are anticipated through the sale of investments, equity financing, the exercise of mineral properties
option, convertible debt, or other means.
During the nine
months ended August 31, 2017, we received $10.0 million in funding from South32 for the exploration program at the Bornite Project
which is categorized as an investing activity as the funds are being utilized on the UKMP. The Company is responsible for the
disbursement of these funds in accordance with the approved program and budget and accordingly has not classified the funds as
restricted cash. Funds are transferred to operating accounts on a monthly basis in accordance with the approved budget and working
capital needs. As at August 31, 2017, the Company held $2.7 million in a segregated bank account for spending on the approved
year 1 program at the Bornite Project.
During the nine months ended August 31,
2017, we generated $2.2 million in proceeds from the sale of investments. The proceeds were used for general operating activities.
There was no comparable amount from investing activities in 2016 as we acquired the investments in September 2016. Subsequent to
quarter-end, we have generated approximately an additional C$1.0 million in proceeds from the sale of investments.
During the nine
months ended August 31, 2017, $0.1 million was used in financing activities to pay statutory employee withholding taxes on Restricted
Share Units that vested. There were no comparable amounts from financing activities in 2016.
Contractual
obligations
Contractually obligated
cash flow requirements as at August 31, 2017 are as follows.
in thousands
of dollars
|
|
Total
$
|
|
|
<
1 Year
$
|
|
|
1–2
Years
$
|
|
|
2–5
Years
$
|
|
|
Thereafter
$
|
|
Accounts payable
and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Office
lease
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
|
6,108
|
|
|
|
4,803
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
On February 21,
2017, the Company entered into a lease for office space effective July 1, 2017 for a period of seven years with a total commitment
of $1.3 million.
Off-balance
sheet arrangements
We have no material
off-balance sheet arrangements. The Company has lease commitments for office spaces with a remaining total commitment of $1.3
million.
Outstanding
share data
At October 4, 2017, we had 105,674,303
common shares issued and outstanding. At October 4, 2017, we had outstanding 6,521,740 warrants with an exercise price of $1.60
each, 7,197,500 stock options with a weighted-average exercise price of $0.56, 1,041,232 DSUs, 600,002 RSUs, and 20,685 NovaGold
DSUs for which the holder is entitled to receive one common share for every six NovaGold shares received. For additional information
on NovaGold Arrangement Options and NovaGold DSUs, please refer to note 6 in our August 31, 2017 interim consolidated financial
statements. Upon exercise of all of the forgoing convertible securities, the Company would be required to issue aggregate of 15,363,921
common shares.
New
accounting pronouncements
Certain recent
accounting pronouncements have been included under note 2 in our August 31, 2017 unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
Critical
accounting estimates
The most critical
accounting estimates upon which our financial status depends are those requiring estimates of the recoverability of our capitalized
mineral properties, impairment of long-lived assets, and valuation of stock-based compensation.
Mineral properties
and development costs
All direct costs
related to the acquisition of mineral property interests are capitalized. The acquisition of title to mineral properties is a
complicated and uncertain process. We have taken steps, in accordance with industry standards, to verify the title to mineral
properties in which it has an interest. Although we have made efforts to ensure that legal title to mining assets is properly
recorded, there can be no assurance that such title will be secured indefinitely.
Impairment
of long-lived assets
Management assesses
the possibility of impairment in the carrying value of its long-lived assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that the
carrying amounts of the asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Significant judgments are made in assessing the possibility
of impairment. Management considers several factors in considering if an indicator of impairment has occurred, including but not
limited to, indications of value from external sources, significant changes in the legal, business or regulatory environment,
and adverse changes in the use or physical condition of the asset. These factors are subjective and require consideration at each
period end. If an indicator of impairment is determined to exist, management calculates the estimated undiscounted future net
cash flows relating to the asset or asset group using estimated future prices, mineral resources, and operating, capital and reclamation
costs. When the carrying value of an asset exceeds the related undiscounted cash flows, the asset is written down to its estimated
fair value, which is usually determined using discounted future cash flows. Management’s estimates of mineral prices, mineral
resources, foreign exchange rates, production levels and operating capital and reclamation costs are subject to risk and uncertainties
that may affect the determination of the recoverability of the long-lived asset.
Stock-based
compensation
Compensation expense
for options granted to employees, directors and certain service providers is determined based on estimated fair values of the
options at the time of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which takes into account, as of the grant date, the
fair market value of the shares, expected volatility, expected life, expected forfeiture rate, expected dividend yield and the
risk-free interest rate over the expected life of the option. The use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires input
estimation of the expected life of the option, volatility, and forfeiture rate which can have a significant impact on the valuation
model, and resulting expense recorded.
Additional
information
Additional information
regarding the Company, including our annual report on Form 10-K, is available on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com
and EDGAR at
www.sec.gov
and on our website at
www.trilogymetals.com
. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference.