FOMC FOMO Corporation (PK)

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Note 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ORGANIZATION

2050 Motors, Inc., (the “Company”) was incorporated on October 9, 2012, in the state of Nevada to import, market, and sell electric cars manufactured in China. On October 25, 2012, 2050 Motors, Inc., entered into an agreement with Jiangsu Aoxin New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd., (“Aoxin”), located in Jiangsu, China, for the distribution in the United States of a new electric automobile, known as the e-Go EV.

Note 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the SEC’s requirements for Form 10-Q and, in the opinion of management, contain all adjustments, of a normal and recurring nature, which are necessary for a fair statement of (i) the condensed balance sheets at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016; (ii) the condensed statements of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016; and (iii) the condensed statements of cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. However, the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements do not include all information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The Condensed balance sheet, included in this report, as of December 31, 2016 was derived from the 2016 audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP.

These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the SEC on April 17, 2017.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements were prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include collectability of accounts receivable, accounts payable, sales returns and recoverability of long-term assets.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash consists of deposits in one large national bank. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had $24 and $11,766 in cash in the United States. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any risks on its cash in bank accounts.

Property, Plant & Equipment

Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term. The estimated useful lives of our property and equipment are generally as follows: tools and equipment, five years; vehicles and parts, three years; leasehold improvements, lesser of lease term or life of related asset; and furniture and fixtures, seven years.

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:

Depreciation expense was $8,757 and $9,900 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Depreciation expense was $18,220 and $19,800 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Impairment of LongLived Assets and Assets

The Company reviews longlived assets to be held and used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recorded. No impairment losses were recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

For certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash accounts payable, accrued liabilities, short-term debt and derivative liability, the carrying amounts approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. We adopted ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, which requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company. ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions, such as valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

The Company analyzes all financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,” and ASC 815.

We have recorded the conversion option on few notes as a derivative liability as a result of the variable conversion price, which in accordance with U.S. GAAP, prevents them from being considered as indexed to our stock and qualified for an exception to derivative accounting.

We recognize derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the accompanying balance sheets at fair value. We record changes in the fair value of the derivatives in the accompanying statement of operations.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are as follows as of June 30, 2017:

The following is a reconciliation of the derivative liability for which Level 3 inputs were used in determining the approximate fair value:

Earnings Per Share (EPS)

Basic EPS is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed similar to basic net income per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all the potential common shares, warrants and stock options had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Diluted EPS is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method for the outstanding options and the if-converted method for the outstanding convertible preferred shares. Under the treasury stock method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Under the if-converted method, convertible outstanding instruments are assumed to be converted into common stock at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later). During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred losses. Therefore, the effect of any common stock equivalents is anti- dilutive during those periods.

The following table sets for the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:

Weighted average number of shares in computing basic and diluted net loss

Advertising and Marketing Costs

Costs incurred for producing and communicating advertising and marketing are expensed when incurred and included in selling general and administrative expenses. Advertising and marketing expense amounted to $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Advertising and marketing expense amounted to $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Income Taxes

The Company utilizes FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 740, Income Taxes, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that were included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The Company follows FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (codified in FASB ASC Topic 740). When tax returns are filed, it is likely that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. Interest associated with unrecognized tax benefits is classified as interest expense and penalties are classified in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statements of income.

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had not taken any significant uncertain tax positions on its tax returns for period ended December 31, 2016 and prior years or in computing its tax provision for 2016. Management has considered its tax positions and believes that all of the positions taken by the Company in its Federal and State tax returns are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. The Company is subject to examination by U.S. Federal and State tax authorities from inception to present, generally for three years after they are filed.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Cash is mainly maintained by one highly qualified institution in the United States. At various times, such amounts are in excess of federally insured limits. Management does not believe that the Company is subject to any unusual financial risk beyond the normal risk associated with commercial banking relationships. The Company has not experienced any losses on our deposits of cash.

Foreign Currency Risk

Any significant changes in foreign currency exchange rates may have significant impact on Company’s future financial statements upon fulfilling certain purchase commitments in accordance to the license agreement disclosed in Note 5.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This update addresses a diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. We adopted this ASU in 2016 and the implementation did not have a material impact on our financial position or statement of operations.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “ Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern” , Subtopic 205-40, “ Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” The amendments in this ASU apply to all entities and require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. We adopted this ASU in 2016 and the implementation did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Reclassification

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations or cash flow.

Note 3 – GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate the continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company reported accumulated deficit of $3,022,377 as of June 30, 2017. The Company also incurred net losses of $213,462 and $300,232 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively and had negative working capital for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. To date, these losses and deficiencies have been financed principally through the issuance of common stock, loans from related parties and from third parties.

In view of the matters described, there is substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern without a significant infusion of capital. We anticipate that we will have to raise additional capital to fund operations over the next 12 months. To the extent that we are required to raise additional funds to acquire properties, and to cover costs of operations, we intend to do so through additional offerings of debt or equity securities. There are no commitments or arrangements for other offerings in place, no guaranties that any such financings would be forthcoming, or as to the terms of any such financings. Any future financing will involve substantial dilution to existing investors.

Note 4 – VEHICLE DEPOSITS

Vehicle deposit of $24,405, as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, represents one prototype test model for delivery into the United States in late 2017. This vehicle will undergo an advanced crash test known in the Automobile Safety Industry as the “overlap crash test”.

Note 5 – LICENSE AGREEMENT

In 2012 and 2013, the Company made a total payment of $50,000 and signed an exclusive license agreement with Aoxin to import, assemble and manufacture the advanced carbon fiber electric vehicle, the e-Go EV model. The cost of this license agreement has been recognized as a long-term asset and is evaluated, by management, for impairment losses at each reporting period. As of June 30, 2017, no such impairment losses have been identified by the management.

Note 6 – ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DUE TO RELATED PARTIES

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued 140,808 shares of common stock for payment of a related party accounts payable totaling $8,589, including penalties.

Note 7 – LOANS PAYABLE DUE TO RELATED PARTIES

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company raised two loans for a total amount of $100,000 due to a shareholder. The loans bear 12% interest and matured on February 28, 2015 and March 30, 2015, respectively. Subsequently, the loans have been combined and the maturity date has been extended to April 1, 2018. The outstanding balance as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $3,550 and $36,050, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30 2017, the Company recorded an interest of $305 and $943, respectively, on the note.

The Company received a $10,000 loan during the third quarter of 2016 from a related party. The loan bears 12% interest and on March 16, 2017, the original maturity date, an extension was granted to April 1, 2018. The outstanding balance on the loan as of June 30, 2017 was $10,000. The Company accrued an interest of $299 and $596 on the loan during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

Note 8 – CONVERTIBLE NOTE PAYABLES

On November 1, 2016, the Company entered into four convertible promissory notes with three unrelated parties. The principle amount is $10,000 for each note and carries interest of 12% annum. All four notes mature on April 30, 2017. The notes may be converted into common stock of the Company at any time by the election of the lender at a conversion price of $0.075 per share. The Company recorded a debt discount of $16,000 for the difference in the conversion price and the fair market value on the date of agreement. The debt discount is being amortized over the term of the notes. On April 30, 2017, the Company extended the term of the four notes by 90 days until July 29, 2017. The remaining debt discount is being amortized over the extended term. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company amortized $2,667 and $10,667, respectively, of the debt discount. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded $1,185 and $2,412, respectively, of interest expense.

On October 26, 2016, the Company entered into a convertible note agreement, with an accredited investor, for $65,000. The note bears interest at 12% per annum and is due and payable on July 26, 2017. The note has financing cost of $9,500 associated with it. This deferred financing fee has been deducted directly from the carrying value of the note, pursuant to ASU 2015-03. The deferred financing fee is being amortized over the term of the convertible note payable. The Company may prepay the note in full together with any accrued and unpaid interest plus any applicable pre-payment premium set forth in the note. Until the Ninetieth (90th) day after the Issuance Date the Company may pay the principal at a cash redemption premium of 135%, in addition to outstanding interest, which can be paid without the Holder’s consent; from the 90th day to the One Hundred and Twentieth (120th) day after the Issuance Date, the Company may pay the principal at a cash redemption premium of 140%, in addition to outstanding interest, which can be paid without the Holder’s consent; from the 12th day to the One Hundred and Eightieth (180th) day after the Issuance Date, the Company may pay the principal at a cash redemption premium of 145%, in addition to outstanding interest, which can be paid without the Holder’s consent. After the 180th day up to the Maturity Date this Note shall have a cash redemption premium of 150% of the then outstanding principal amount of the Note, plus accrued interest and Default Interest if any, which may only be paid by the Company upon Holder’s prior written consent The note is convertible into fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock, after 180 days from the date of the note, at a conversion price which is lower of: (i) a 50% discount to the lowest trading price during the previous twenty trading days prior to the date of a conversion notice; or (ii) a 50% discount to the lowest trading price during the previous twenty trading days before the date that this note was executed. Since the conversion price of the note is variable, the conversion option has been treated as a derivative liability. The derivative liability on the note was calculated, using the Binomial model, to be $242,500, of which $55,500 was recorded as a debt discount and the balance $186,500 was recorded as an interest expense, at inception. As of December 31, 2016, the derivative liability amounted to $270,025.

On April 25, 2017, the Company entered into a note amendment whereby, the maturity of the note was extended to January 26, 2018 and the principal was increased by $7,800 to $72,800. The Company had paid $33,118 to the note holder on April 25, 2017. The derivative liability was recalculated on June 30, 2017 as $103,516 and the difference in the value was recorded as a change in derivative liability in the income statement. The additional finance fee of $7,800 is being amortized over the remaining term of the note. The remaining debt discount of $18,500, as of the date of amendment, is also being amortized over the remaining term of the note. The Company amortized a debt discount of $9,554 and $27,851, respectively, during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2017. The Company amortized the finance fee of $3,168 and $7,041, respectively, during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2017. Interest expense of $1,923 and $4,037 was accrued on the convertible note respectively, during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2017. Additional interest of $33,118 was paid in cash on April 25, 2017, pursuant to the amended note terms.

The variables used for the Binomial model are as listed below:

On January 6, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible note agreement with a third party for $78,750. The Company received $70,000, net of the financing fee of $8,750. This deferred financing fee has been deducted directly from the carrying value of the note, pursuant to ASU 2015-03. The deferred financing fee is being amortized over the term of the convertible note payable. The note is due on October 6, 2017 and carries interest at the rate of 12% per annum. The note is convertible at the lower of ; (i) a 50% discount to the lowest trading price during the previous twenty five trading days prior to the date of a conversion notice; or (ii) a 50% discount to the lowest trading price during the previous twenty five trading days before the date that this note was executed. Since the conversion price of the note is variable, the conversion option has been treated as a derivative liability. The derivative liability on the note was calculated, using the Binomial model, to be $137,118, of which $70,000 was recorded as a debt discount and the balance $67,118 was recorded as an interest expense, at inception.

On June 30, 2017, the Company entered into a note amendment agreement to increase the principal balance of the note by $14,100 to $92,850. The Company paid the $14,100 to the holder on July 6, 2017, to delay conversion option until September 5, 2017, pursuant to the amended terms. The derivative liability was recalculated on June 30, 2017 as $96,279 and the difference in the value was recorded as a change in derivative liability in the income statement.

The Company amortized a debt discount of $23,333 and $44,872, respectively, during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2017. The Company amortized the finance fee of $2,917 and $5,609, respectively, during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2017. Interest expense of $2,356 and $4,531 was accrued on the convertible note during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2017.

The variables used for the Binomial model are as listed below:

On April 21, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible note agreement with a third party for $58,000. The Company received $55,000, net of the financing fee of $3,000. This deferred financing fee has been deducted directly from the carrying value of the note, pursuant to ASU 2015-03. The deferred financing fee is being amortized over the term of the convertible note payable. The note is due on January 30, 2018 and carries interest at the rate of 12% per annum. The note is convertible at any time starting after the first 180 days of the note and ending on the later of the maturity date or the date of payment. The note is convertible at 61% of the Market Price. Market price shall mean the average of the lowest two trading prices during the last fifteen trading day period completed on the latest trading day prior to the conversion. Since the conversion price of the note is variable, the conversion option has been treated as a derivative liability. The derivative liability on the note was calculated, using the Binomial model, to be $85,380, of which $55,000 was recorded as a debt discount and the balance $30,380 was recorded as an interest expense, at inception.

The derivative liability was recalculated on June 30, 2017 as $67,227 and the difference in the value of $18,153, was recorded as a change in derivative liability in the income statement. The Company amortized a debt discount of $13,556, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. The Company amortized the finance fee of $739, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. Interest expense of $1,335 was accrued on the convertible note during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

The variables used for the Binomial model are as listed below:

On May 31, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible note agreement with a third party for $28,000. The Company received $25,000, net of the financing fee of $3,000. This deferred financing fee has been deducted directly from the carrying value of the note, pursuant to ASU 2015-03. The deferred financing fee is being amortized over the term of the convertible note payable. The note is due on March 15, 2018 and carries interest at the rate of 12% per annum. The note is convertible at any time starting after the first 180 days of the note and ending on the later of the maturity date or the date of payment. The note is convertible at 61% of the Market Price. Market price shall mean the average of the lowest two trading prices during the last fifteen trading day period completed on the latest trading day prior to the conversion. Since the conversion price of the note is variable, the conversion option has been treated as a derivative liability. The derivative liability on the note was calculated, using the Binomial model, to be $37,967, of which $25,000 was recorded as a debt discount and the balance $9,967 was recorded as an interest expense, at inception.

The derivative liability was recalculated on June 30, 2017 as $32,454 and the difference in the value of $5,513, was recorded as a change in derivative liability in the income statement. The Company amortized a debt discount of $2,604, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. The Company amortized the finance fee of $312, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. Interest expense of $276 was accrued on the convertible note during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

The variables used for the Binomial model are as listed below:

Note 9 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Effective March 1, 2014, the Company signed a lease for four thousand square feet of industrial space in North Las Vegas. The term of the lease is for three years and cost $2,200 per month. The lease expired on April 30, 2017 and thereafter, the Company has continued leasing the space on a monthly basis at the same amount.

Rent expense amounted to $6,539 and $12,867 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Rent expense amounted to $12,956 and $32,483 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

According to the license agreement signed between the Company and Aoxin, in order to maintain exclusive rights for the United States (US), the Company is required to purchase and sell certain amount of e-Go EV model vehicles per year for a certain period of time starting from the completion of the requirements established by the United States Department of Transportation’s protocols for the e-Go EV model. The table below demonstrates the required amount of vehicles that the company needs to sell per year.

As part of the license agreement, the Company is committed to pay expenses related to any required airbag testing procedures. The cost of these airbags could be as little as $500,000 or as much as $2 million.

The Company may from time to time, become a party to various legal proceedings, arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company investigates these claims as they arise. Management does not believe, based on current knowledge, that there were any such claims outstanding as of June 30, 2017.

Note 10 – REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT- RELATED PARTY

On February 12, 2016, the Company signed a twelve months revolving line of credit agreement with a consulting firm which is also utilized for consulting services. The line amount is $100,000 and carries interest at 12% per annum. As of June 30, 2017, the outstanding balance was $101,400.

Note 11 – INCOME TAXES

The Company did not file its tax returns for fiscal years from 2012 through 2016. Management believes that it should not have any material impact on the Company’s financials because the Company did not have any tax liabilities due to net loss incurred during these years.

Based on the available information and other factors, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 will not be fully realizable. Accordingly, management has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had federal net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $3,000,000 and $2,800,000, respectively, expiring beginning in 2032.

Deferred tax assets consist of the following components:

Note 12 – PROMISSORY NOTE AND EQUITY PURCHASE AGREEMENT

On June 24, 2016, the Company issued a $75,000 non-refundable Promissory Note to an investor as a pre condition to an Equity Purchase Agreement. The promissory note bears 10% interest per annum with a one year maturity date. The note is recognized as a deferred finance charge and is being amortized over the contract period.

The Equity Purchase Agreement allows the Company to issue Put Notices and the right to sell up to $10,000,000 of its no par value common stock at 88% of its market value. The market value is based on a ten day valuation period immediately preceding the Put Notice. The right to sell the shares becomes an obligation to sell as of the closing date after the Put Notice has been issued to the investor. The investor at no time can own more than 9.99% of the Company’s common stock outstanding as of the closing date.

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares (See Note 13) to the note holder to convert the outstanding principal balance of $75,000 and accrued interest of $6,576. As of June 30, 2017, the outstanding balance of the note was $0.

Note 13 – EQUITY

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company issued 200,000 shares of company’s common stock, valued at $0.1574 per share, to a third party in exchange for consulting and advisory services for a period of six months.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued 36,885 shares of company’s common stock, to a third party for $2,250 cash.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued 140,808 shares of company’s common stock, for payment of a related party accounts payable totaling $8,589, including penalties.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued 177,694 shares of company’s common stock in exchange for consulting and advisory services, valued at $10,839.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of company’s common stock, to convert a non-refundable promissory note of $75,000 along with interest accrued on the same of $6,574. The shares issued were recorded at the fair market value of $0.054 on the date of conversion notice.