Notes
to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE
1 – ORGANIZATION
Next
Graphite, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Nevada on September 26, 2012 under the name Zewar Jewellery, Inc.
and is a development-stage entity. The Company’s current business plan is to engage in the mining business developing graphite
properties located in Namibia. The Company is based in Carson City, Nevada.
On
November 14, 2013, the Company consummated transactions pursuant to a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”)
dated November 14, 2013 by and among the Company and the stockholders of African Graphite, Inc., a private Nevada corporation
(“AGI” and the “AGI Stockholders”) whereby AGI Stockholders transferred 100% of the outstanding shares
of common stock of AGI held by them, in exchange for an aggregate of 8,980,047 newly issued shares of the Company’s common
stock, par value $.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”).
On
November 14, 2013, AGI entered into a Stock Purchase Option Agreement (the “Option Agreement”) with NMC Corp., a corporation
organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada (“NMC”), whereby NMC granted to AGI an option to purchase
90 ordinary shares, par value one Namibian dollar per share, of Gazania Investments Two Hundred and Forty Two (Proprietary) Limited,
a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Namibia (“Gazania”), representing 90% of the issued and outstanding
shares of Gazania, for $240,000. NMC had entered into an option agreement dated March 29, 2013, as amended on November 4, 2013
(the “Centre Agreement”), with Centre for Geoscience Research CC (formerly known as “Industrial Minerals and
Rock Research Centre CC”), a company organized under the laws of the Republic of Namibia (“Centre”), whereby Centre
agreed to transfer to Gazania 100% undivided interest in the exclusive prospecting license No. 3895 known as AUKAM originally
issued to Centre by the government of the Republic of Namibia on April 4, 2011 and renewed on April 4, 2013 (the “License”).
The License grants the right to conduct prospecting operations, bulk sampling and pilot production in the license area called
AUKAM located in southern Namibia in the Karas Region within the Betaine district. The license area covers about 49,127 hectares.
The only mine in Namibia which has produced graphite is situated in the license area. The transfer of the License to Gazania was
approved by the Ministry of Mines and Energy of the Republic of Namibia on February 25, 2014.
Under
the Option Agreement, AGI was required to pay to NMC $90,000 as an advance payment to be credited towards the purchase price of
the Gazania shares. The Company made the advance payment on November 14, 2013. The balance of the purchase price in the amount
of $150,000 was paid by AGI upon exercise of the option that was completed on March 14, 2014. As a result, Gazania became a direct
90% owned subsidiary of the Company.
The
Company acquired the remaining 10% ownership of Gazania for $15,000 in the third quarter of 2015. As a result, Gazania became
a direct 100% owned subsidiary of the Company.
NOTE
2 – GOING CONCERN
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company
has incurred approximately $5,180,458 in accumulated deficit since its inception, and has generated no operating revenue, which
could raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
In
view of these matters, realization of the assets of the Company is dependent upon the Company’s ability to meet its financial
requirements through equity financing and the success of future operations. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
do not include adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities
that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.
NOTE
3 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and are presented in
accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
included herein contain all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary to present fairly the financial
position, the results of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows of the Company for the periods presented. These
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes hereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2016 included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2017. The
operating results or cash flows for the interim periods presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected
for any other interim period or the full year.
NOTE
4 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Revenue
Recognition, Deferred Revenue and Customer Deposits
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition,” when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, the price is fixed or determinable, collection is reasonably assured and delivery of products has occurred or services
have been rendered. The Company did not have product sales for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
The
Company received a customer deposit for potential usage of Company’s license in the amount of $177,493 and $132,971 as of
March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The Company recognize the amount of $177,493 as additional paid-in capital
by transferring 52% of interest to the joint venture party.
Income
Taxes
Provisions
for income taxes are based on taxes payable or refundable and deferred taxes. Deferred taxes are provided on differences between
the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements and tax operating loss carry forwards.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the financial statements at currently enacted income tax rates applicable
to the period in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws
or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. Assets and liabilities
are established for uncertain tax positions taken or positions expected to be taken in income tax returns when such positions
are judged to not meet the “more-likely-than-not” threshold based on the technical merits of the positions. Estimated
interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of general and administrative expense.
Basic
and Diluted Loss per Common Share
Basic
loss per common share amounts are computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding
during each period. Diluted loss per share amounts are computed assuming the issuance of common stock for potentially dilutive
common stock equivalents.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for accounts payable, and related party payables approximate fair value because
of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The carrying amounts reported for convertible notes payable
approximate fair value based on the value of the common stock into which the notes are convertible. The carrying amounts reported
for notes payable approximate fair value because the underlying instruments are at interest rates that approximate current market
rates.
ASC
820 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities
required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it
would transact and it considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. ASC 820 establishes
a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs
when measuring fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest
level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used
to measure fair value:
|
●
|
Level
1 – Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company
holds. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with
sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
|
|
●
|
Level
2 – Valuation based on quoted prices in markets that are not active for which all significant inputs are observable,
either directly or indirectly.
|
|
●
|
Level
3 – Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.
|
Financial
instruments include cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities. The carrying amounts of cash, accounts
payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate their fair value due to the short term maturities of these
instruments.
The
Company has Level 3 financial instrument, an embedded derivative liability (beneficial conversion feature) that is recorded at
fair value on periodic basis. The embedded derivative is evaluated under the hierarchy of ASC 480-10, ASC Paragraph 815-25-1 and
ASC Subparagraph 815-10-15-74 addressing embedded derivatives. The fair value of such Level 3 financial instrument is estimated
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The foregoing Level 3 financial instrument has certain provisions which qualifies
to be classified as a liability under ASC 815.
As
of March 31, 2017, the following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for items that are required to be measured
at fair value on a recurring basis:
Description
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
46,476
|
|
As
of December 31, 2016, the following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for items that are required to be
measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Description
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
38,756
|
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-09,
Compensation
– Stock Compensation
(Topic 718)
: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
. This ASU is intended
to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification
of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The provisions of this ASU are effective
for years beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
this ASU.
In
August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15,
Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a
Going Concern
. This ASU establishes specific guidance to an organization’s management on their responsibility to evaluate
whether there is substantial doubt about the organization’s ability to continue as a going concern. The provisions of ASU
2014-15 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. This ASU is not expected to have an impact
on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606). The objective of ASU
2014-09 is to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue by removing inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements;
providing a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues; improving comparability of revenue recognition practices across
entities, industries, jurisdictions and capital markets; and providing more useful information to users of financial statements
through improved revenue disclosure requirements. On August 12, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, deferring the effective
date by one year for ASU No. 2014-09. The provisions of ASU No. 2014-09 will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of this standard on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
NOTE
5 – ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
As
of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, the Company’s accounts payable was primarily composed of professional fees.
NOTE
6 – NOTES PAYABLE
The
Company had the following notes payable as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
Issuance Date
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
Interest
Rate
|
|
|
March 31,2017
(unaudited)
|
|
|
December 31,2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 10, 2015
|
|
February 9, 2016
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
24,000
|
|
|
$
|
24,000
|
|
March 31, 2015
|
|
September 30, 2015
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
December 3, 2015
|
|
February 29, 2016
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
December 23, 2015
|
|
September 29, 2016
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
20,500
|
|
|
|
20,500
|
|
March 2, 2016
|
|
September 29, 2016
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
March 2, 2016
|
|
September 29, 2016
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
August 3, 2016
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
August 3, 2016
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
September 9, 2016
|
|
March 9, 2017
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
October 13, 2016
|
|
April 13, 2017
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
147,000
|
|
|
$
|
147,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original issuance discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,517
|
)
|
|
|
(1,517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
145,483
|
|
|
$
|
145,483
|
|
The
notes payable with the maturity date that has matured at the time the financial statements are issued continued to accrue interest
and default interests were incurred. Interest expense for notes payable amounted to $3,123 and $11,142 for the quarters (3 months)
ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company recorded original issue discount of $1,517 for March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
NOTE
7 – NOTES PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY
The
Company had the following related party notes payable as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
Description
|
|
Issuance Date
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
(unaudited)
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Doron
|
|
July 8, 2015
|
|
September 8, 2015
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
Charles C. Bream III
|
|
July 8, 2015
|
|
September 8, 2015
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Charles C. Bream III
|
|
August 24, 2015
|
|
November 23, 2015
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Charles C. Bream III
|
|
August 1, 2016
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,000
|
|
|
$
|
16,000
|
|
Interest
expense for notes payable-related party amounted to $316 and $298 for the quarter (3 months) ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
NOTE
8 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
The
Company issued convertible notes payable. The outstanding balance and any accrued interest is due on maturity date or when the
cash is available to repay the notes payable. Under the agreement, the notes can be convertible at the holder’s discretion
into common shares of the Company’s stock at a 25% discount to the price at the date of exercise.
The
Company’s convertible notes payable is as follows:
Convertible Note
|
|
Issuance Date
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Original Borrowing
|
|
|
Balance at
March 31, 2017
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 1
|
|
October 2, 2014
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Note 2
|
|
December 23, 2015
|
|
September 23, 2016
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
21,000
|
|
|
$
|
21,000
|
|
|
$
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,000
|
|
|
|
121,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
121,000
|
|
|
$
|
121,000
|
|
The convertible notes with the maturity date that has matured at the time the financial statements are issued continued to accrue
interest and default interests were incurred. The Company incurred $2,554 and $1,665 of interest expense for the quarter (3 months)
ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. No convertible notes were converted as of March 31, 2017 and up to the date the financial statements
are issued.
The
Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”) (previously
EITF 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock”),
as the convertible note agreement contained certain provision that the convertible note failed to pass the “fixed for fixed”
criteria of ASC815, the conversion feature of the convertible debt should have to be bifurcated and recorded separately until
the conversion date.
The
following table represents fair value of embedded derivative movement from the date of issuance to December 31, 2016:
Embedded Derivative Liabilities
|
|
Fair Value at Date of Issuance
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 1 – Issued in 2014
|
|
$
|
70,334
|
|
|
$
|
(34,778
|
)
|
|
$
|
35,556
|
|
Note 2 – Issued in 2015
|
|
$
|
10,500
|
|
|
$
|
(17,800
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(52,578
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,756
|
|
As
a result of initial recording of derivative liability of $30,500 for convertible notes issued in 2015 with proceeds of $49,000
the Company recorded debt discount of $30,500 at the date of issuance of convertible note payable for issuances occurred in 2015.
The Company accretes debt discount of $30,500 for convertible notes issued in 2015 and $70,334 for convertible note issued in
2014 over the life of the convertible note.
Based
on ASC 815, the Company determined that the convertible debt contained embedded derivatives and full-ratchet provision which the
Company valued the embedded derivative using the Black-Scholes method. The following table represents fair value of embedded derivative
movement from the date of issuance to March 31, 2017:
Embedded Derivative Liabilities
|
|
Fair Value at Date of Issuance
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value at March 31, 2017
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 1 – Issued in 2014
|
|
$
|
70,334
|
|
|
$
|
(37,001
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,333
|
|
Note 2 – Issued in 2015
|
|
$
|
21,000
|
|
|
$
|
(7,857
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(44,858
|
)
|
|
$
|
46,476
|
|
The
Company recorded accretion of $5,483 and $7,350 for the three months ended on March 31, 2017 and 2016 which is recorded as interest
expense.
NOTE
9 – PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The
Company recognizes the tax effects of transactions in the year in which such transactions enter into the determination of net
income regardless of when reported for tax purposes. Deferred taxes are provided in the financial statements under FASB 740-10-65-1
to give effect to the temporary differences which may arise from differences in the bases of fixed assets, depreciation methods
and allowances based on the income taxes expected to be payable in future years. Minimal development stage deferred tax assets
arising as a result of net operating loss carry-forwards have been offset completely by a valuation allowance due to the uncertainty
of their utilization in future periods.
The
Company recognizes interest accrued relative to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expense.
During the period from August 28, 2013 (inception) to March 31, 2017, the Company recognized no income tax related interest and
penalties. The Company had no accruals for income tax related interest and penalties at March 31, 2017.
NOTE
10 -
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
As
of March 31, 2017, the Company had (i) 100,000,000 Common shares authorized with a par value of $.0001 per share, of which 51,411,443
shares were issued and outstanding, and (ii) 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.0001 per share, authorized, none
of which was issued and outstanding.
On November 14, 2013, the Company consummated transactions
pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement with AGI dated November 14, 2013 by and among the Company and the stockholders of AGI
whereby the AGI Stockholders transferred 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of AGI held by them, in exchange for an
aggregate of 8,980,047 newly issued shares of Common Stock
, of which, 400,016 shares were issued to the President and director
as part of their consulting agreements. The shares were valued at par for a value of $898.
NOTE
11 – RESTRICTED COMMON SHARES AND WARRANTS
In
May 20, 2014, the Company approved future issuances of performance based restricted common shares to the following employees and
outside consultants. The Company accounts the issuances of restricted common shares, as defined by ASC 718,
Compensation—Stock
Compensation
, in accordance with ASC 718. The restricted common shares will be issued upon completion of certain tasks or
deliverables and contain certain exercise price with no expiration period.
On
May 28, 2015, the Company has elected to grant warrants to certain entities and individuals in lieu of restricted common stock
that has been issued.
As of March 31,2017: (i) 2,793,651 shares
of Company common stock were subject to issuance pursuant to outstanding convertible notes payable, (ii) 12,855,000 shares of Company
common stock were subject to issuance pursuant to the existing warrants. There are total 48,588, 557 unissued shares of Company
common stocks, which are more than the potential of common stocks if the convertible debt and warrant have been converted at the
end of March 31, 2017.
a) A
summary of the status of the Company’s restricted common shares is presented below:
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(in
Years)
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Vested at March 31, 2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
b) The
stock warrants issued in lieu of restricted common stock granted but not yet issued is presented below:
Date Issued
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
|
|
Expiration date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 28, 2015 (Issued in lieu of restricted common stock)
|
|
$
|
0.011
|
|
|
|
2,720,000
|
|
|
3.16 years
|
|
May 27, 2020
|
May 28, 2015 (Issued in lieu of restricted common stock)
|
|
$
|
0.011
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
3.16 years
|
|
May 27, 2020
|
June 16, 2015 (Issued in lieu of restricted common stock)
|
|
$
|
0.011
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
3.21 years
|
|
June 15, 2020
|
July 8, 2015 (Issued in lieu of restricted common stock)
|
|
$
|
0.011
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
3.27 years
|
|
July 7, 2020
|
July 8, 2015 (Issued in lieu of restricted common stock)
|
|
$
|
0.011
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
3.27 years
|
|
July 7, 2020
|
August 24, 2015 (Issued in lieu of restricted common stock)
|
|
$
|
0.011
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
3.40 years
|
|
August 23, 2020
|
February 1, 2016
|
|
$
|
0.003
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
3.84 years
|
|
January 31,2021
|
February 1, 2016
|
|
$
|
0.003
|
|
|
|
1,750,000
|
|
|
3.84 years
|
|
January 31,2021
|
February 29, 2016
|
|
$
|
0.004
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
3.92 years
|
|
February 28, 2021
|
July 15, 2016
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
4.29 years
|
|
July 14, 2021
|
January 6, 2017
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
1,750,000
|
|
|
4,77 years
|
|
January 5, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total warrants at September 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,855,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
initial fair value of the new warrants issued for services in 1
st
quarter, 2016 was estimated at an aggregate value
of $5,449. The initial fair value of the new warrants issued for services in 3
rd
quarter, 2016 was estimated at an
aggregate value of $40,002. The initial fair value of the new warrants issued for services in 1st quarter, 2017 was estimated
at an aggregate value of $48,558. All warrants are vested and exercisable immediately.
The
total 1,750,000 and 4.750,000 share of warrants for three months ended on March 31,2017 and 2016 were issued to a related party,
360 Partners.
NOTE
12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The
Company is subject to various legal proceedings from time to time as part of its business. As of March 31,2017, the Company was
not currently party to any legal proceedings or threatened legal proceedings, the adverse outcome of which, individually or in
the aggregate, it believes would have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
NOTE
13 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
ASC
855, “Subsequent Events. ASC 855 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after
the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. During these periods, other than
as set forth above, the Company did not have any material recognizable subsequent events required to be disclosed other than those
disclosed in this note to the financial statements as of and for quarter ended March 31, 2017.