PRED Predictive Technology Group Inc (CE)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1- BUSINESS DESCRIPTION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BUSINESS DESCRIPTION:

Predictive Technology Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively, “PTG” or the “Company”), develops and commercializes discoveries and technologies involved in novel molecular diagnostic, therapeutic, and Human Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (“HCT/Ps”). The Company uses this information as the cornerstone in the development of new diagnostics that assess a person’s risk of disease and develop pharmaceutical therapeutics and HCT/Ps for use by healthcare professionals to improve outcomes in their patients.  The Company’s corporate headquarters are located in Salt Lake City, Utah.

SEGMENT INFORMATION:

Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker (CODM) in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance.  The Company operates in two reportable segments, which are differentiated by product.  The HCT/P segment offers minimally manipulated tissue products intended for homologous use, prepared utilizing proprietary extraction methods that reduce the loss of important scaffolding, growth factors and cytokines.  The Company’s Diagnostics and Therapeutics segment uses data analytics for disease identification and subsequent therapeutic intervention through novel gene-based diagnostics, and companion therapeutics. Lastly, the “Unallocated Corporate” column in the table below represents those headquarters activities that do not qualify as operating segments and which are not allocated to operating segments in information provided to the CODM. We currently sell our products exclusively in the United States.

During the fourth quarter of 2019, we realigned our segment reporting to separately present headquarters costs in information available to the CODM.  The presentation of the comparative information has been recast to conform to the 2019 presentation.

-7-

Segment revenue and operating income (loss) were as follows during the periods presented:

-8-

BASIS OF PRESENTATION:

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Predictive Technology Group, Inc. (the “Company” or “Predictive”) in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for financial information and pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries.   All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly all financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  

The condensed consolidated financial statements herein should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. Operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2019 may not necessarily be indicative of results to be expected for any other interim period or for the full fiscal year.

Fiscal Year End

The Company operates on a fiscal year basis with the fiscal year ending on June 30.

Consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Predictive Technology Group, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries.  All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.  

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents.  The Company places its temporary cash investments with high-quality financial institutions.  

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that the Company will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts of liabilities that may result from any inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

The Company believes that its existing cash and cash equivalents of $841,843 at September 30, 2019, expected revenues and borrowings under our Revolving Loan Agreement are sufficient to fund operations as currently planned through at least one year from the date of the issuance of these financial statements. However, the Company cannot predict, with certainty, the outcome of its actions to grow revenues. The Company has based this belief on assumptions and estimates that may prove to be incorrect, and the Company could spend its available financial resources less or more rapidly than currently expected. The Company may continue to require additional sources of cash for general corporate purposes, which may include operating expenses, working capital to improve and promote its commercially available products, advance product candidates, general capital expenditures and satisfaction of debt obligations. Management may seek additional capital through debt financings, collaborative or other funding arrangements with partners, or through other sources of financing. Should the Company seek additional financing from outside sources, the Company may not be able to raise such financing on terms acceptable to the Company or at all. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital when required or on acceptable terms, this could have a material adverse effect on liquidity and could raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In such a case, the Company may be required to scale back or to discontinue the promotion of currently available products, scale back or discontinue the advancement of product candidates, reduce headcount, file for bankruptcy, reorganize, merge with another entity, or cease operations.

-9-

Trade Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Trade accounts receivable are primarily comprised of amounts due from sales of the Company’s HCT/P products and are recorded at the invoiced amount. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable, which is based on historical write-off experience, customer creditworthiness, facts and circumstances specific to outstanding balances, and payment terms. Account balances are charged against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to its customers and does not require collateral.

Inventories

Inventories consist primarily of HCT/Ps produced by Predictive Biotech and laboratory supplies used in genetic testing performed by Predictive Labs.  We value inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. We determine the cost of inventory using the standard cost method, which approximates actual cost based on a first-in, first-out method.  All other costs, including administrative costs, are expensed as incurred.   

We analyze our inventory levels at least annually and write down inventory that has a cost basis in excess of its expected net realizable value, or that is considered in excess of normal operating levels, as determined by management.  We also reserve for the quantity of quarantined (WIP) inventory that is not expected to pass quality control based on historical averages. The related costs are recognized as cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of operations.

Stock Subscriptions Receivable

Stock subscriptions are recorded as contra-equity on the day the subscription agreement is signed and accepted by the Company.  As of September 30, 2019 and June 30, 2019, all stock subscribed has been fully paid.  

Prepaid Expenses

Amounts paid in advance for expenses are accounted for as prepaid expenses and classified as current assets if such amounts are to be recognized as expense within one year from the balance sheet date.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Lab equipment, furniture and computer equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on the lesser of estimated useful lives of the related assets or the underlying lease term. Lab equipment items have depreciable lives of 5 years, furniture items have depreciable lives of 5 to 7 years, and computer equipment items have depreciable lives of 3 years. Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred. Amortization of assets recorded under finance leases is included in depreciation expense.

The Company reviews property and equipment for impairment. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of their carrying amounts to future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If property and equipment are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds its fair market value.

-10-

Leases

We have entered into operating and finance lease agreements primarily for office and laboratory facilities and laboratory equipment located in Salt Lake City, Utah with lease periods expiring between 2020 and 2022.

We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. For all classes of underlying assets, we elect not to recognize right of use assets or lease liabilities when a lease has a lease term of 12 months or less at the commencement date and does not include an option to purchase the underlying asset that we are reasonably certain to exercise. Operating lease assets and liabilities are included on our consolidated balance sheet beginning July 1, 2019. Finance lease assets are included in property and equipment, net.

Operating lease assets and liabilities are recognized at the present value of the future lease payments at the lease commencement date. The interest rate used to determine the present value of the future lease payments is our incremental borrowing rate, because the interest rate implicit in most of our leases is not readily determinable. Our incremental borrowing rate is estimated to approximate the interest rate on a collateralized basis with similar terms and payments, and in economic environments where the leased asset is located. Operating lease assets also include any prepaid lease payments and lease incentives. Our lease terms include periods under options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. We generally use the base, non-cancelable, lease term when determining the lease assets and liabilities. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Our lease agreements generally contain lease and non-lease components. Non-lease components primarily include payments for maintenance and utilities. We combine fixed payments for non-lease components with our lease payments and account for them together as a single lease component which increases the amount of our lease assets and liabilities.

Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets

Intangible and other long-lived assets are comprised of acquired patents, licenses, trade secrets and other intellectual property.  Acquired intangible assets are recorded at fair value and amortized over the shorter of the contractual life or the estimated useful life.

The Company reviews definite-lived intangible assets for impairment. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of their carrying amounts to future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If identifiable intangibles are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds its fair market value.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets not subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment annually, typically at the beginning of the fourth fiscal quarter, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable.  Such events and circumstances may include sweeping regulatory changes, shifts in market demand that would negatively impact revenue, overall industry deterioration, dramatic increase in the number of competitors, rapidly increasing costs related to production inputs, significant changes in Company management or Company strategy, or significant litigation.  The Company first assesses qualitative factors above to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test to identify any impairment loss.

Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to estimated future undiscounted net cash flows, or fair value, of the related asset or group of assets over their remaining lives.  

Certain of the Company’s patents are currently subject to litigation (see Note 14) to determine whether the seller of the patents had satisfactory title to the patents that were then sold to the Company. These patents have a carrying value of $6,659,314 on our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2019. While the litigation is in its early stages and may reach a broad range of possible outcomes, we have determined that it is at least reasonably possible that the patents may become impaired in the near term depending on the information gained during the legal discovery process and the outcome of the litigation.

-11-

Revenue Recognition

We derive our revenue primarily from sales of HCT/P products to clinicians. The majority of our contracts with customers have a single performance obligation, and all of our contracts with customers have a duration of less than one year. Revenue is recognized when control of the product passes to the customer, typically upon confirmation of delivery of the product to the customer. As our products must remain frozen during transit, we typically ship our products overnight. Revenue is recognized in an amount that reflects the expected consideration to be received in exchange for such goods or services. As such, customer orders are recorded as deferred revenue prior to delivery of products or services ordered.

Generally, we require authorization from a credit card or verification of receipt of payment before we ship products to customers. From time to time we grant credit to our customers with normal credit terms (typically 30 days). We do not recognize assets associated with costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer, as the amortization period for any such costs if capitalized would be one year or less.

Shipping and handling is considered a fulfillment activity, as it takes place prior to the customer obtaining control of the product, and fees charged to customers are included in net revenue upon completion of our performance obligation. Shipping and handling expenses are included in cost of sales. We present revenue net of sales taxes, discounts, and expected returns.

Deferred Revenue

We recognize a contract liability when customer payment precedes the completion of our performance obligations.

The following table provides information about deferred revenue from contracts with customers, including significant changes in deferred revenue balances during the period (in thousands).

-12-

Research and Product Development Costs

The Company expenses research and product development costs as incurred.

Product Liability and Warranty Costs

The Company maintains product liability insurance and has not experienced any related claims from its product offerings. The Company also offers a warranty to customers providing that its products will be delivered free of any material defects.  There have been no material costs incurred since inception based on estimated return rates.  The Company reviews the adequacy of its accrual on a quarterly basis.

Income Taxes

In order to determine the Company’s quarterly provision for income taxes, the Company uses an estimated annual effective tax rate that is based on expected annual income and applicable federal and state tax rates.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded to reflect the future tax consequences attributable to the effects of differences between the carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities for financial reporting and for income tax purposes. Deferred taxes are calculated by applying enacted statutory tax rates and tax laws to future years in which temporary differences are expected to reverse. The impact on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that the rate change is enacted.  

Other Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss is comprised of net loss and other comprehensive loss. Other comprehensive loss is equal to net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.

Measurement of Fair Value

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs. A fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values.  Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined in the following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

During the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, we did not have any remeasurements of non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis subsequent to their initial recognition.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting periods.  Key estimates in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include, among others, revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts and product returns, provisions for obsolete inventory, valuation of long-lived assets, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances.  Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

-13-

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326)” which introduces new guidance for the accounting for credit losses on instruments within its scope. The new guidance introduces an approach based on expected losses to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments. For trade receivables, the Company will be required to use a forward-looking expected loss model rather than the incurred loss model for recognizing credit losses which reflects losses that are probable. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those years. Early application of the guidance is permitted for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including the interim periods within those fiscal years. Application of the amendments is through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this update on the consolidated financial statements.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In February 2016, the FASB established Topic 842, Leases, by issuing Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, which requires lessees to recognize leases on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU No. 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842; ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases; and ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements. The new standard establishes a right-of-use model (ROU) that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases are classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the income statement.

The new standard was effective for us on July 1, 2019. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may choose to use either (1) its effective date or (2) the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application. If an entity chooses the second option, the transition requirements for existing leases also apply to leases entered into between the date of initial application and the effective date. The entity must also recast its comparative period financial statements and provide the disclosures required by the new standard for the comparative periods. We used the effective date as our date of initial application. Consequently, financial information was not updated, and the disclosures required under the new standard were not provided for dates and periods before July 1, 2019.

The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. We elected the ‘package of practical expedients’, which permits us not to reassess under the new standard our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. We elected all of the new standard’s available transition practical expedients that are applicable.

The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. We elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means, for those leases that qualify, we will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities, and this includes not recognizing ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. We also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of our leases, other than for leases of real estate.

-14-

NOTE 2 CORRECTION OF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Subsequent to the issuance of the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 2018, the Company discovered (i) an error in the Company's accounting for income taxes, primarily with regard to the impact of income taxes on the Company's accounting for business combinations and asset acquisitions, and (ii) a clerical error in the calculation of volatility used as an input to the Black-Scholes model used to value the warrants issued as consideration for the acquisition of certain intellectual property.  As a result, the Company has corrected the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss and the statement of stockholders' equity for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from amounts previously reported to (i) record a benefit from income taxes of $612,452, (ii) record $273,900 in share based compensation expense , and (iii) reduce amortization expense related to intangible assets by $6,708.

Additionally, the Company identified the following errors in the calculation of weighted average shares outstanding underlying the calculation of earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2018.  Common shares in the amount of 23,127,666 issued prior to the 2017 fiscal year were thought to have been cancelled, when in fact they remain legally outstanding.  The weighted average shares outstanding used to calculate earnings per share were also calculated incorrectly, such that the total corrected weighted average shares outstanding increased by 30,813,446. The error did not affect reported earnings per share in any period.

The condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the three months ended September 30, 2018 has also been corrected for the adjustments to the condensed consolidated statement of operations discussed above, to have reported net loss agree to the net loss shown in operating cash flows, and to correct the presentation of certain investing and financing activities as follows. First, amounts related to the acquisition of InceptionDX, LLC improperly included noncash activity, and have been corrected in investing activities to show only the cash received as a result of the acquisition.  Non-cash consideration paid for InceptionDX, LLC has been separately disclosed in the corrected table of supplemental cash flow disclosures. Second, $1,216,634 of cash paid under our subscription payable previously incorrectly included in financing activities has been reclassified to investing activities.

In addition to the impact of the corrections described above, the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2018 includes certain insignificant corrections in presentation that were made to conform to the fiscal 2019 annual financial statements.

The following tables present the effects of the corrections to the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss and the statement of cash flows for the three months ended September 30, 2018.

-15-

-16-

Unaudited consolidated statement of cash flows

-17-

NOTE 3 BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND ASSET ACQUISITIONS

Inception DX, LLC

On August 22, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement captioned “Securities Purchase Agreement” with the members of Inception DX, LLC (“Inception”), a Utah limited liability company. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company acquired Inception for 15,500,000 shares of common stock. Inception owns laboratory equipment, partial interest in database records for over 31,900,000 individuals for use in genetics research, 400,000 units in Juneau Biosciences, LLC, initial CLIA registration, CLIA lab protocols, and other assets. Once the CLIA registration is completed, Inception will be used as a CLIA-certified laboratory by Predictive Technology Group, Inc. and its affiliates.

The stock issued was for cash, laboratory equipment, membership units in Juneau Biosciences, LLC (“Juneau units”), and trade secrets related to the DNA database and protocols related to a future use as a CLIA laboratory.  The Juneau units were valued based on the value assigned when the Company entered into a subscription to purchase units of Juneau ($1.10 per unit).  The equipment will be depreciated over 5 years.  The proprietary data, DNA library, protocols, research and methods are classified as trade secrets in our industry.  The Company will amortize the trade secrets over an estimated useful life of 15 years.   

The stock price on August 22, 2018 was $0.92 per share, indicating a purchase price of $14,260,000 requiring allocation:

Taueret Laboratories, LLC Asset Purchase

On August 22, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement captioned “Asset Purchase Agreement” (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Taueret Laboratories, LLC and its members. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued warrants exercisable for 16,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The warrants were exercisable at fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the closing date. In consideration for the warrants, the Company acquired (i) approximately 1,000 degenerative disc disease related DNA samples, related family records, relevant clinical records (including approximately 600 affected probands) and 800 ancestry matched control samples, (ii) whole exome sequencing data on approximately 300 degenerative disc disease samples, over 800 local controls, and published reference populations, together with initial analysis of the markers, (iii) project plan, study paperwork, promotional study and materials used in the research study, (iv) exclusive use of a DNA biobank that has a collection of over 300,000 samples for multiple diseases that the Company may target, (v) the remaining interest in database records for over 31,900,000 individuals for use in genetics research, and (vi) other assets.

-18-

The warrants issued are for proprietary data and methods that are otherwise a trade secret in our industry.  Therefore, the Company determined to classify the assets purchased as trade secrets with a 15-year life.  The Company used a Black Scholes calculation to determine valuation of the warrants of $13,860,000. As the purchase of the trade secrets with common stock warrants resulted in a difference between book and tax basis in the trade secrets, the carrying amount of the trade secrets was increased to $18,480,000 to reflect the deferred tax liability of $4,620,000 assumed in the transaction.

The fair value of the warrants was determined using the following inputs to the Black Scholes model:

Expected volatility was calculated from the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock.

Regenerative Medical Technologies, Inc.

On December 19, 2018 the Company executed a merger with the shareholders of Regenerative Medical Technologies, Inc. (“RMT”), a Utah corporation. The Company acquired RMT for 10,000,000 shares of common stock. RMT holds various assets including (i) models, methods and protocols for collection of birthing tissue and DNA samples, (ii) patient registry models, methods and protocols to collect clinical outcomes and electronic medical records, and (iii) designs and methodologies relating to many initiatives that are complementary to anticipated product offerings and ongoing research, and (iv) other assets.

The fair value of consideration paid was determined based on our stock price of $0.92 on the date of acquisition. In addition, the Company recognized a deferred tax liability of $3,066,667 related to the differences between book and tax basis arising from the acquisition, resulting in a total purchase price of $12,266,667. The Company determined that the assets acquired qualify for treatment as trade secrets within industry.  The trade secrets will be amortized over an estimated useful life of 10 years.  

Taueret Laboratories, LLC Acquisition

On March 22, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of Taueret Laboratories, LLC (“Taueret”) pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement (as amended, the “Purchase Agreement”), dated January 1, 2019. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding units of Taueret. The Company and its affiliates plan to use Taueret’s CLIA-certified laboratory to perform diagnostic testing services.

The Purchase Agreement also specifies that the Company may, at its sole discretion, put certain patents related to the diagnosis and treatment of Preeclampsia (the “Preeclampsia IP”) back to the members of Taueret at any time prior to December 31, 2020 (the “Preeclampsia Option”). On December 31, 2020, an additional payment of $8,547,000 in cash will become due if the Company has not exercised the Preeclampsia Option. After considering the relevant accounting guidance, we determined that the Preeclampsia Option was not part of the business combination with Taueret, because the Preeclampsia Option was included in the Purchase Agreement primarily to benefit the acquirer.

The Company acquired Taueret and the Preeclampsia Option for total consideration of $931,817, net of cash acquired of $85,964. The consideration was paid as 552,995 shares of the Company’s common stock. The common stock was valued at the closing price on the date of the closing of the merger, adjusted for a 20% discount for lack of marketability related to a contractually stipulated lockup provision with a period of one year. The consideration was allocated between the business combination and the Preeclampsia Option on a relative fair value basis with $917,511 allocated to the business combination and $100,000 allocated to the Preeclampsia Option. The Preeclampsia Option was recorded in intangible assets and will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the period the option is exercisable.

Total consideration transferred was allocated to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values as of the acquisition date.  

-19-

Management estimated the fair value of tangible and intangible assets and liabilities in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance for business combinations and utilized the services of third-party valuation consultants.  These amounts are provisional and may be adjusted during the measurement period, which expires no later than one year from the acquisition date, if new information is obtained that, if known, would have affected the amounts recognized as of the acquisition date.

 Identifiable intangible assets

The Company acquired intangible assets that consisted of an internally developed laboratory information management system which had an estimated fair value of $239,000, CLIA regulatory licenses with a fair value of $295,000, and customer relationships with a fair value of $16,000. The fair value of the software was determined using the replacement cost method.  The fair value of the CLIA licenses were estimated using the excess earnings method. The estimated net cash flows were discounted using a discount rate of 22%, which is based on the estimated internal rate of return for the acquisition and represents the rate that market participants might use to value the intangible assets. The projected cash flows were based on key assumptions such as estimates of revenues and operating profits. The Company will amortize the intangible assets on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 15 years for the CLIA license and 5 years for the software and customer relationships. This amortization is deductible for income tax purposes.  

-20-

Bargain purchase gain

Any excess of fair value of acquired net assets over the purchase price (negative goodwill) has been recognized as a gain in the period the acquisition was completed. We have reassessed whether all acquired assets and assumed liabilities have been identified and recognized and performed remeasurements to verify that the consideration paid, assets acquired, and liabilities assumed have been properly valued. The remaining excess has been recognized as a gain in other income and expense in the consolidated statement of operations. The bargain purchase gain partly resulted from the allocation of the total consideration between the business combination and the Preeclampsia Option. We also believe we were able to negotiate a bargain price due to the desire of the sellers to induce the Company to purchase the Preeclampsia Option contemporaneously with the business combination.

Depreciation expense for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $381,886 and $83,133, respectively.

-21-

-22-

Estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets consists of the following as of September 30, 2019:

Total amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $2,228,359 and $1,582,589 respectively.

Endometriosis license

On December 28, 2016, Predictive Therapeutics and Juneau amended and restated the license agreement dated July 9, 2015.  

An additional license fee of $2,000,000 is due and payable once the Company has received profits of $25,000,000 related to the intellectual property licensed under the agreement.

Upon first commercial sale of the licensed assay, the Company will issue to Juneau common shares with a market value of $2,500,000.  Juneau is entitled to a royalty equal to 50% of net sales, adjusted to exclude certain costs and fees, and subject to certain minimums.

In March of 2018, the Company’s licenses with Juneau were amended to reduce the royalty rate and expand the scope of the licenses to include the entire field of endometriosis and pelvic pain. The Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock and 14,000,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.80 per share as consideration.

In December of 2018 the Company and Juneau agreed to renegotiate the price paid for the license.  The warrants issued initially for this license agreement were cancelled, and new warrants were issued with an increased exercise price of $0.90 per share, resulting in a decrease in the value assigned to the license agreement of $4,449,211. The replacement of the warrants resulted in an additional deferred tax liability of $290,263, resulting in a net decrease in the carrying value of the licenses of $4,158,948.  There was an associated adjustment to amortization expense. The fair value of the replacement warrants were determined using the following inputs to the Black Scholes model:

Companion diagnostic license

In addition to the license for the commercialization of assays and related services for the prognosis and monitoring of endometriosis in the infertility market, the Company entered into a license agreement with Juneau to use the assay as a companion diagnostic test in conjunction with endometriosis therapeutics that may be developed from intellectual property owned by the Company and Juneau.  Once FDA approval is granted on any companion diagnostic test, a final milestone payment of $250,000 is due.

The agreement requires a 2% royalty to be paid to Juneau on the sale of patented therapeutic products specifically covered by the agreement.

The Company amortizes the licenses over the life of the underlying patents.

-23-

In December 2017, the Company and Juneau reached verbal agreement on a stock subscription arrangement. The Company agreed to purchase 15,681,818 Class A Units of Juneau at a price of $1.10 per unit. In early 2018, the terms were finalized and memorialized in a subscription agreement executed by the Company and Juneau. Under the terms of the agreement (as amended), the subscription is to be paid in installments through September 30, 2021. The Company has the option to cancel the subscription.  If this option is exercised, any units of Juneau issued to the Company but not paid will be cancelled. The agreement includes certain restrictions on the use of funds provided under the subscription agreement and grants the Company the right to appoint a minority of Juneau’s Board of Managers.  Should the Company elect not to fund the entire subscription, Juneau’s obligations to the Company that are not related to the license agreements (see Note 6) will terminate.

On September 25, 2019, the Company and Juneau executed an amendment to the subscription agreement. The amendment changed the schedule of payments due under the subscription agreement to purchase units of Juneau. In addition, a receivable due from Juneau in the amount of $184,443 was applied to the subscription payable balance.  The schedule of payments as of September 30, 2019 under the amended agreement is as follows:

-24-

Summarized financial information for the Company’s equity method investee as of and for its fiscal year end is presented in the following tables:

-25-

NOTE 9 DEBT

From June to September 2019, the Company issued unsecured promissory notes to an accredited investor in the total amount of $2,900,000. The promissory notes bear 12% simple interest and mature on the two year anniversary of each note. The notes may be repaid at any time.

In September 2019, the Company and the accredited investor entered into a Revolving Loan Agreement whereby the accredited investor agreed to lend the Company up to an additional $3,000,000. Amounts drawn under the revolving loan will be charged interest at a rate of 12% and may be repaid at any time. There was no balance drawn under the Revolving Loan Agreement as of September 30, 2019. All amounts outstanding under the revolving loan are due upon the expiration of the revolving loan facility on September 30, 2021.  

In September 2019, the Company issued unsecured promissory notes to a second accredited investor in the amount of $3,600,000. The promissory notes bear 12% simple interest and mature on the two year anniversary of the notes. The notes may be repaid at any time.

Promissory notes with a face value of $400,000 mature during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021. Promissory notes with a face value of $6,100,000 mature during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.

The fair value of the Company’s outstanding debt obligations as of September 30, 2019 was $6,500,000 which was determined based on a discounted cash flow model using an estimated market rate of interest of 12%, which is classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.

NOTE 10 INCOME TAXES

In order to determine the Company’s quarterly provision for income taxes, the Company used an estimated annual effective tax rate that is based on expected annual income and applicable federal and state tax rates.  The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduced the federal corporate tax rate to 21% in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019.  Section 15 of the Internal Revenue Code Stipulates that the Company’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, had a blended corporate tax rate of 28%, which is based on the applicable tax rates before and after the Tax Act and the number of days in the year. For the fiscal years ending after June 30, 2019, the Company’s federal corporate tax rate is 21%.  Certain significant or unusual items are separately recognized in the quarter during which they occur and can be a source of variability in the effective tax rate from quarter to quarter.

The Company recognized income tax benefits of $5,208,418 and $612,452 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company’s recognized effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate for the three months ended September 30, 2019 primarily due to state income taxes, share based compensation and excess tax benefits arising from the exercise of commons stock warrants during the period.  The Company’s recognized effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate for the three months ended September 30, 2018 primarily due to state income taxes and share based compensation.

NOTE 11 STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY

The Company has issued various warrants exercisable for our common stock outside of the 2015 Stock Option Plan (see Note 13). The warrants were issued to raise capital, as compensation for acquisitions of intellectual property, and as compensation for services.

-26-

In September 2019, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for research and development services. In consideration for these services, the Company granted options to the consultant exercisable for 1,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a strike price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Options to acquire 625,000 shares vested upon issuance. Of the remaining options, 375,000 vest on March 1, 2020 and 225,000 vest on September 1, 2020.  The warrants expire ten years from the date of issuance.

On July 16, 2019 and August 1, 2019, a total of 11,000,000 common stock warrants issued to FlagshipSailsRx, LLC, our former sales and marketing contractor, were exercised pursuant to a cashless exercise feature. The cashless exercise resulted in the issuance of 9,172,157 shares of common stock and the cancellation of 1,827,843 warrants as consideration for the exercise price.

The following is a summary of warrant activity from June 30, 2019 through September 30, 2019:

The Company recognizes expense for warrants issued for services that are subject to graded vesting on a straight-line basis. As Share based compensation expense related to warrants issued for services for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $1,890,213 and $586,444, respectively.

As of September 30, 2019, unrecognized compensation cost related to warrants issued for services was $5,371,927 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.51 years.

-27-

Potentially dilutive securities that would be excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per common share because to include them would be anti-dilutive are as follows:

-28-

NOTE 13 STOCK OPTION PLAN

 In 2015, a Stock Option Plan was adopted to advance the interests of the Company and its shareholders by helping the Company obtain and retain the services of employees, officers, consultants, independent contractors and directors, upon whose judgment, initiative and efforts the Company is substantially dependent, and to provide those persons with further incentives to advance the interests of the Company. Eligible participants include employees, officers, certain consultants, or directors of the Company or its subsidiaries.  

The number of shares, terms, and vesting periods are determined by the Company’s Board of Directors or a committee thereof on an award-by-award basis. Awards provided under the Plan generally vest in three equal annual installments. The maximum term of options issued under the plan is 10 years from the date of grant. The aggregate number of shares of Option Stock that may be issued pursuant to the exercise of Options granted under this Plan will not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the total outstanding shares of the Company's common stock. The Company settles exercises of stock option awards by issuing new shares. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur.

A summary of option activity is as follows for the three months ended September 30, 2019:

Share based compensation expense related to options issued under the 2015 Plan for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $3,104,387 and $380,742, respectively.

The Company recognizes expense for awards subject to graded vesting on a straight-line basis. As of September 30, 2019, there was $28,671,765 of total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to stock options issued under the 2015 Stock Option Plan that will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.64 years.

-29-

NOTE 14 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Licenses

The Company has commitments under license agreements which are described in Note 5.

Leases

Operating leases primarily relate to the Company’s leases of laboratory and office space expiring in December 2020. The Company also has short term “month to month” leases of office space.

In March 2019, the Company entered into finance leases of laboratory equipment.  The validation process for the leased equipment was completed and payments commenced in October 2019.  The lease expires in September 2022, at which time the Company has the option to purchase the leased equipment for one dollar.  

The table below presents the future minimum lease payments under operating and finance leases:

-30-

Lease information for the three months ended September 30, 2019 is as follows:

Lease expense under operating leases was $51,777 for the three months ended September 30, 2018.

-31-

Purchase commitments

In March 2019, in connection with the lease of laboratory equipment described above, the Company agreed to purchase a fixed quantity of the consumables used by the equipment for a total of $1,386,710. The Company is obligated to pay for the consumables in twelve fixed monthly installments beginning in October 2019. At September 30, 2019, the Company had taken delivery of consumables worth $500,502. The amount due for goods that have been delivered is included in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Remaining payments due under the purchase commitment total $1,040,233 during the year ending June 30, 2020 and $346,477 during the year ending June 30, 2021.

Legal proceedings

On or about July 13, 2018, RTJ, LLC and two of its principals filed a lawsuit against Predictive Therapeutics LLC, Predictive Biotech, Inc., both subsidiaries of Predictive Technology Group, Inc., and Jack Turner, Jr., an employee of Predictive Biotech, Inc. The plaintiffs had acted in a distributor capacity. The relationship was terminated. Plaintiffs are alleging breach of contract, promissory estoppel, unjust enrichment, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, defamation, false light, and tortious interference. Based on the information available to us, we do not believe any of the RTJ proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position or liquidity. Further, we deny the allegations in the complaint, have not discovered any evidence of wrongdoing with respect to the allegations and will vigorously defend against these allegations.

On or about May 1, 2019, Surgenex, LLC and one of its principals filed a lawsuit against Predictive Therapeutics LLC, Predictive Biotech, Inc., both subsidiaries of Predictive Technology Group, Inc., and Doug Schmid, an employee of Predictive Biotech, Inc. In 2014 Surgenex contracted with Utah Cord Bank, Inc., a former employer of Doug Schmid, to assist Surgenex in the doing work relating to allograft tissue. Schmid was later hired by Predictive Biotech, Inc. In connection with Schmid’s employment with Predictive Biotech, Surgenex has filed a lawsuit alleging unjust enrichment, conspiracy, conversion, tortious interference with contractual and business relations, violations of trade secrets act, and other claims. Based on the information available to us, we do not believe the Surgenex proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position or liquidity. Further, we deny the allegations in the complaint, have not discovered any evidence of wrongdoing with respect to the allegations and will vigorously defend against these allegations.

On or about July 12, 2019, Predictive Technology Group, Inc. and Predictive Therapeutics, LLC, a subsidiary of Predictive Technology Group, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Michael Schramm. Schramm had previously acted as our patent agent. While acting as our patent agent, Schramm entered into an agreement to sell us certain patents and patent applications in consideration for equity securities. Schramm represented that he owned all right, title and interest in and to the intellectual property. We were subsequently advised by the patent counsel who replaced Schramm that Schramm’s representation was false. The Company raised these concerns with Schramm, who did not provide satisfactory evidence addressing the concerns of our current patent counsel. We sued Schramm for breach of contract, conversion and on other legal theories and are seeking, among other things, rescission of the purchase and sale transaction. Schramm filed a counterclaim against us and Bradley C. Robinson, our Chief Executive Officer and Transfer Online, Inc., our transfer agent. Schramm is alleging he did not make any false representations. He is alleging, among other things, that various parties involved in the transaction committed breach of contract, conversion, violations of Nevada state law for failure to transfer securities, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference, and civil conspiracy.  Based on the information available to us, we do not believe the Schramm proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position or liquidity. Further, we deny the allegations in the counterclaim, have not discovered any evidence of wrongdoing with respect to the allegations in the counterclaim and will vigorously prosecute our claims against Schramm.

As of September 30, 2019, we did not record a liability related to these matters as it was determined that an unfavorable resolution is either not currently probable or that an amount or relevant range is not reasonably estimable, or both. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable and it is possible that losses may occur. Any unfavorable resolution of any of these matters could materially affect our consolidated financial position, cash flows, or results of operations. All legal costs associated with litigation are expensed as incurred.

-32-