Coretec Group Inc (CE) (CRTG) Quote

Report of Disclosure Revision (Filing from DKME today on Dart )

Revision Date 2025-06-18
1. Disclosure Documents in relation with Revision Resolution to convene general shareholders' meeting
2. Submission date of documents 2025-06-18
3. Reason for Revision Change in schedule of extraordinary general shareholders' meeting
4. Revised Information
information before revision after revision
2. Date 2025-07-03 / 09:00 2025-07-08 / 09:00
-
Decision on Calling Shareholders' Meeting
1. Type of shareholders' meeting Extraordinary meeting
2. Date and time of meeting 2025-07-08 09:00
3. Place of meeting 260-37, Cheoyong-ro, Nam-gu, Ulsan Metropolitan City
3rd floor, conference room, head office
4. Agenda and key issues Agenda No. 1: Appointment of directors
Agenda No. 2: Dismissal of directors
5. Date of board resolution (decision date) 2025-04-16
- Attendance of outside directors Present(No.) 4
Absent(No.) 0
- Attendance of auditors (members of Audit Committee who are not outside directors) -
6. Other matters to be factored into investment decisions
- All three members of our Audit Committee are outside directors.
- Date of confirmation of shareholders: June 4, 2025
- The main contents of the above 4. agenda may change and will be re-disclosed in case of change.
? Related disclosure 2025-05-19 Shareholders' meeting convocation resolution
2025-04-16 Shareholders' meeting convocation resolution

Hey John,

Thanks again for all the consistent DD you share on this forum. We’ll all be reaping a good reward soon.

DKME delisting objection application? Minority shareholders "Disclose the contents" ( news out today June 17th out of Korea )

Hong Sang-soonJune 17, 2025 08:43:49
Print font size
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on KakaoTalk
DKME, which has been decided to be delisted, and former KIB (KIB) Plug Energy submitted an objection application and an improvement plan to the Korea Exchange yesterday (6/16).

DKME is known to have actively explained the eligibility of the major shareholder, which is currently under controversy, and additionally submitted a second plan to change the major shareholder if it is not proven.

Minority shareholders held a rally in front of the Korea Exchange on the 13th to oppose the delisting and are demanding that the company disclose the improvement plan.

https://www.usmbc.co.kr/article/DHa3ZXRt-71BF

I believe that out of the many many great things that I have waited for to push this company to the big time........ that never came to fruition ....... the current event of them getting their financial shit together over the past 6 months has been the most painful for me. I really am just lacking faith that this company is truly on the right path. Just seems very toxic to me. Just my opinion.

at least someone is.....

man, these lawyers are making a lot of money....

DKM submits an opposition related to delisting.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2025/6/16/dihvkDKM-submits-an-opposition-related-to-delisting-Screenshot_16-6-2025_85058_dart.fss.or.kr.jpeg

Notice on Other Matters (Disclosure of KRX). ( Filing from DKME Co LTD IN KOREA TODAY )
1. Title DKME (Co., Ltd.) Submission of Objection to Delisting
2. Details DKME (Co., Ltd.) was determined to meet the criteria for delisting in accordance with Article 48, Paragraph 2 of the Listing Regulations of the Korea Exchange as a result of the deliberation of the Corporate Review Committee on May 22, 2025 for substantive examination of listing eligibility.

In relation to this, the company submitted an objection to delisting on June 16, 2025,

and the Korea Exchange will hold a Listing Disclosure Committee meeting within 20 days (based on business days) from the date of receipt of the objection to deliberate on whether to delist, and will decide on delisting, granting an improvement period, etc. within 3 days from the date of deliberation.
3. Other references useful for making investment decisions -
? Title and date of other disclosure related to this one 2025-05-22 Other Market Information (Notice of Results of Substantive Examination of Listing Eligibility)

In my Last Post, I should have said 'trading halt' instead of 'suspend trading'.

This coming Friday will mark one month since Coretec approved the resolution in its 8-K filing.

When they are ready to file publicly, I wonder if Coretec will suspend trading until its financials are publicly available and it gets approved for regular trading on the OTC.

From the 8-K.
“On May 13, 2025, the Board of Directors of The Coretec Group, Inc. (the “Company”) took action by written consent in lieu of a meeting, in accordance with Section 8 of Article III of the Bylaws of the Company. The Board approved changes in corporate leadership and governance, including the appointment of new officers, acceptance of resignations, and authorization of regulatory filings and financing.”

There is really only one thing I want to see, the company getting all its required filings in here in the US, and normal trading on the market restored. All the rest is interesting, but meaningless without legitimate trading here.

Once that's reestablished, perhaps we can get a handle on what we really own. There are at least a couple carmakers who'll have solid state sodium batteries in cars with nearly 1000 mile range on their cars. Is our technology compatible with their batteries.

To me it doesn't make any sense to build a battery plant that doesn't make the best of the batteries that will be employed practically everywhere by 2030 IMHO.

From what I read a 900 mile battery will be slightly smaller and lighter than those that provide 300 miles today, and if the chargers have the capacity charge them faster. If they're actually building a new battery plant it should be for this or a better battery form.

Gary

Ok is it just me or does it sound suspicious that both companies got accused of misconduct and then get scooped up?

I've posted year by year revenue/ financials for IsMedia and the year they got in trouble the media were dumfounded as the were having a very good year revenue wise then after the accusations came out everything started to go bad because the stock sold off got delisted and then lost their business to Core Optics who purchased the CCM business and retooled it. Question really is about today what happens with Coretec and does DKME Co Ltds business who's name was changed by Coretecs management at Kib Plug come under the CRTG umbrella through DKME Inc and Coretec merger of some sort and does DKME Inc completely take over DKME Co Ltd and gain more than 23% stake they have now and fully merge witjh DKME Coltd

Both got delisted and both were taken over by new investors and new management during the time period they both got accused of embezzlement. When previous management got into trouble they both got taken over. IsMedia was having a record breaking year when embezzlement accusations came out against the CEO and others . I'll look up all that info from records and news articles out of Korea. IsMedia was actually doing very well financially at the time the embezzlement accusations came out. Can't right now but I'll post all of that info if you need me to. Most importantly Coretec now gets the newly formed CCM business that started from scratch with no real revenue retooled the machines for the Auto industry and were supposed to make 8 million the first year and 16 million this year . Not to shabby for the newly focused business model targeting mostly autos which it hadn't previously

Both got delisted and both were taken over by new investors and new management during the time period they both got accused of embezzlement. When previous management got into trouble they both got taken over. IsMedia was having a record breaking year when embezzlement accusations came out against the CEO and others . I'll look up all that info from records and news articles out of Korea. IsMedia was actually doing very well financially at the time the embezzlement accusations came out. Can't right now but I'll post all of that info if you need me to

isMedia was in financial trouble and faced corruption, and had to start liquidating some of its holdings.
DKM Co., Ltd. is not in financial trouble, at least to the best of our knowledge.

I think Corerec is still in it as they were still listed as directors on the board at DKME Co Ltd in the latest filing even though Kim stepped down as a CEO he was still listed as a director . We will find out at the extrodinary shareholders meeting July 4th or 5th i think where they will dismiss some directors and name news ones according to the filings.

Who is the director at DKME Inc is a good question . The one filing at DKME Inc in Delaware doesnt show any names at all from the filing i ordered for 20 dollars from the Gov site in Delaware. Coretecs people at Kib Plug are the ones who chanked the name to DKME Co ltd when Kim was CEO so i think Coretec is behing DKME Inc in Delaware. They went through all of this with Core Optics and IsMedia as well nothing new to them .
Watch for any more filings at DKME Co ltd and im watching DKME Inc for new filings

Be interesting to know that. De-listing is not the same as bankrupt. DKME is making money so it does seem an injustice for small holders to get aced out. Is it not customary that when a company goes private that shareholders are bought out? The protestors seem to have a legitimate gripe if they end up with nothing through this. Starting to think that Coretec saw a long legal slog coming and just wanted out.

So Coretec is now out of the picture in these proceedings?

ChatGPT said:
Based on the latest available information, Coretec seems to have fully exited the Plug Energy (now DKME Co., Ltd.) saga and is no longer directly involved in the ongoing delisting proceedings in Korea. Here's how this conclusion is supported:

✅ Key Evidence Coretec Is Out of the Picture
Stake Transfer Over

Coretec sold its approximately 22.3% stake in KIB Plug Energy (now DKME) first to Quantum Wealth and then onward to DKME Inc.
globenewswire.com

.Board & Governance Absence

No current filings show Coretec or its executives holding board seats or official roles at DKME Co., Ltd. (formerly KIB Plug). The last known Coretec-associated board members have reportedly resigned, further indicating a clean break.

Legal Disputes Resolved

Court filings previously involved Coretec disputing management voting rights in South Korean courts. Those appeals were dismissed, and there have been no new legal filings implicating Coretec in the delisting situation.

🧭 Current Focus of DKME Shareholder Protests
The protests taking place in Ulsan and Seoul are centered around:

Accusations of embezzlement, mismanagement, and poor governance by DKME’s largest shareholder (DKME Inc.).

Minority shareholders are warning that asset sales or liquidation could hurt small investors under a delisting scenario.
investorshub.advfn.com

There is no indication Coretec is part of this stakeholder struggle—the same protests are directed at DKME Inc. and the Korean stock exchange, not Coretec.

🧠 Summary
Bottom Line: Coretec appears to have completely divested its interest in KIB Plug Energy (DKME Co., Ltd.) and is no longer involved in its board, ownership, or the legal/regulatory issues tied to delisting. The current turmoil surrounds new controlling shareholder DKME Inc. and local governance challenges.

Thanks ! When IsMedia got delisted and Core Optics purchased the companies CCM assets i wonder what shareholders got for their stock ?? This looks like the same thing could happen to DKME CO ltds shareholders.

ChatGPT said:

Yes! Here's an English translation of the signs in the photo, starting from left to right:
🪧 Sign 1 (Yellow/Red)

????? ??? ??? DKME(?) ???? ????!

"Stop the delisting of DKME Co., Ltd. that pushes individual investors to ruin!"

🪧 Sign 2 (Blue/Red)

???? ?????. ‘??? ??? ?? ????’ ??? ???!

"Lee Jae-myung said, ‘I will create a market where shareholders are the owners.’ Now is the time!"

(Note: Lee Jae-myung is a well-known South Korean politician.)
🪧 Sign 3 (Red/White)

DKME ????! ???? ? ?? ????

"Save DKME! Is the stock exchange just watching with open eyes?"

🪧 Sign 4 (Blue/Red)

?????? DKME(?) ???? ???? ????

"Delisting Ulsan’s local company DKME Co., Ltd. will destroy the regional economy"

🪧 Sign 5 (Red/White)

DKME ????! ???? ? ?? ????
(Same as Sign 3)

"Save DKME! Is the stock exchange just watching with open eyes?"

🪧 Sign 6 (Red/Blue)

???? ????? ?? DKME(?) ???? ????!

"Stop the delisting of DKME Co., Ltd. that only benefits the immoral largest shareholder!"

These are clearly coordinated protest slogans from DKME’s minority shareholders, accusing the Korea Exchange and the company’s leadership of collusion, negligence, or corruption—especially to the detriment of small investors and the local economy in Ulsan.

Another photo of the protest of the DKME Co Ltd delisting in Korea outside the Korean Stock exchange https://www.news1.kr/photos/7319082

I would like to know what their signs say in english can any one translate them

News out on DKME Co Ltd with video if you can translate it .. Not sure if they would do a liquidation sale which you sell of asetts when going out of business but they could purchase the business as Core Optics did with ISMedia in Korea when they got delisted .Core Optics LLC was started in Virginia shortly before Core Optics LLC purchased IsMedias Compact Module business in Korea Now Core Optics Ltd in Korea ( which is now a subsidiary of the Coretec Group) . DKME Co LTD in Korea might be purchased in full or merged with DKME Inc the new USA company formed in Delaware in July and become a subsidiary of DKME INC which in turn could merge with Coretec then DKME Inc and DKME Co LTD are under Coretec ??? Any thoughts

https://www.usmbc.co.kr/article/GnFP3f831WRbMa13qj Article translation below but can anyone translate the video

Local company DKME 'delisted'? "Only ants are harmed"
Hong Sang-soonMay 29, 2025 21:30:56
Print font size
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on KakaoTalk
Play

00:00
-02:51
Quiet

Settings
Enter and full screen
Play
[Anchor]

Minor shareholders are protesting the decision to delist DKME, a local company in Ulsan.

They say that the excessive disposal of a company with a sound financial structure is only increasing the damage to minor shareholders.

The company announced that it will soon file an objection with the Korea Exchange.

Hong Sang-soon is holding a press conference.

[Report]

Minor shareholders of DKME, a local company in Ulsan, the former Daegyeong Machinery, are holding a protest in front of the Korea Exchange every day.

This is because the Korea Exchange notified the company of its delisting on the 22nd.

Minority shareholders are protesting, saying that the delisting decision protects the immoral largest shareholder and causes all the damage to the minority shareholders.

If the delisting is confirmed, the stocks of over 13,000 shareholders will become worthless overnight,

while the largest shareholder will be able to escape strict monitoring as a listed company and even increase his 22.5% stake through a liquidation sale.

[DKME Minority Shareholder/Voice Disguised]

"Major shareholders have nothing to lose. Even if it becomes unlisted, they can still operate as if it were unlisted, and they can still embezzle money from transactions, dispose of assets, and do whatever they want at a low price."

The reason for the delisting is that the improvement plan submitted by the company was not properly implemented as a result of the review due to allegations of embezzlement and breach of trust, and management transparency was also inadequate.

Last November, the company was sued by three executives and employees for embezzlement and breach of trust worth 7.08 billion won, and a trading suspension decision was made.

As shareholders’ opposition grew, the company announced on its website that the company’s claims that it was promoting delisting were completely untrue and that it would do its best to resume trading as soon as possible.

DKME, which manufactures heat exchangers, has been in a serious management dispute with the former KIB Plug Energy, changing its major shareholder five times in the past two years.

However, it has consistently posted sales of over 100 billion won and operating profits of over 10 billion won every year, and its financial status is stable with a debt ratio of 55%.

The company plans to submit an objection to the Korea Exchange by the 16th of next month.

[Reporter]

If the Korea Exchange receives an objection, it will hold a Listing Disclosure Committee meeting within 20 business days and decide whether to give the company an additional improvement period or delist it as is.

This is Hong Sang-soon from MBC News.

Video Coverage: Choi Young, Choi Jun-hwan

CG: Kang Sung-woo

ALSO other news agencies coverage . msiron@news1.kr. https://www.news1.kr/photos/7319081

(?)DKME delisting protest rally
Reporter Kim Myeong-seop
Reporter Kim Myeong-seop
2025.05.30 12:55 PM
(Seoul = News 1) Reporter Kim Myeong-seop = On the 30th, members of the DKME small shareholder group are holding a protest against delisting in front of the Korea Exchange in Yeouido, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul. 2025.5.30/News 1
(Seoul = News 1) Reporter Kim Myeong-seop = On the 30th, members of the DKME small shareholder group are holding a protest against delisting in front of the Korea Exchange in Yeouido, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul. 2025.5.30/News 1

It seemed to me that they have prepared all the past-due quarterly and annual reports, and now they need to have them audited by a registered PCAOB audit firm. If they haven't started yet, it will take another month or two.

In the meantime, they could return to trading on OTC markets by submitting an OTC Markets Alternative Reporting Standard (“ARS”), which does not require an audit.

It appears to me in the 8-K report that the $300,000 is also to cover the audit.
From the 8-K.
The actions taken include, among others:
? Approval of financing authorization for related audit expenses;

RESOLVED FURTHER, that to fund the preparation of said ARS Reports—including pre-audit services by an audit-preparation firm, PCAOB audit fees, and any related audit costs from a U.S. CPA firm—the Authorized Officers are hereby authorized to negotiate, enter into, and draw upon a loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to US?$300,000 with such lender and upon such terms and conditions as they deem appropriate, and to execute and deliver any and all agreements, promissory notes, certificates, or other instruments, and to take any other actions they deem necessary or advisable to effectuate such financing; and

ElectricStream21,

What are your thoughts about the 8K that CRTG filed today?

How long do they have to file?  

... and we will finally get a look at some official numbers.

I'm not certain whether the term "regulatory filings" must be interpreted as SEC filings exclusively because the OTC has certain regulatory requirements as well. But, I would say that 300K for an audit that isn't PCAOB is awfully expensive, who would make that outlay just to be a pink sheet company? Maybe things will break loose a little bit in the coming weeks. At least with the filing of this 8K we can see there is some work in progress toward getting us trading again.

From the 8-K.

8. Authority to Update Corporate Records.
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the proper officers of the Corporation are hereby authorized and directed to make all filings and take all other actions necessary or desirable to carry out the intent of these resolutions, including updating the Corporation’s internal records, regulatory filings, website, and public disclosures to reflect the foregoing changes.

This is a quote from Ken Evans from the Coretec Group shareholder Update Call July 22, 2020.

Looks like CRTG will be back on the pinks for now.

"Ken Evans
We are on the pinks now, however, we are in the process of
completing and providing to the OTC markets our application to move onto the OTC:QB. There
are three tiers in the OTC markets, and QB is the second. It confirms that we are a fully
reporting '34 Act company, that we're filing all of our required reports on a timely basis.
And more importantly it provides additional market-makers, who are willing to follow the
company and get involved. It also provides additional credibility for the future as we look to the
capital markets to raise additional financing. It puts us on the path, basically, combined with the
other things that the team are accomplishing with regard to the commercialization of CHS, it
puts us on a pathway to NASDAQ, which is where we would really like to be.'

https://investors.thecoretecgroup.com/static-files/680c3af6-7b41-4eff-b2c8-c00a0ae90786

If CRTG can regain OTC trading then they can grow the Price Per Share (PPS) and pay for some of their expenses without going into debt. That is how I would handle it as debt is an anchor to growth. The board has been trying to position CRTG to break out but IMO they ran into head winds they weren't anticipating. At this point CRTG is ripe for a takeover. Would that be a good thing or bad thing for us?

That is one way to look at it. I'm thinking there may be a number of folks who are weary of it all and will be willing to exit at something near a penny. It's a lot higher than the current triple zero level.

Check out the verbiage in your second link. I believe it is in harmony with the following from ChatGPT.

🟢 Coretec is not filing with the SEC.
The “ARS” referenced in their 8-K stands for OTC Markets Alternative Reporting Standard — not SEC Form ARS (Annual Report to Shareholders).
📄 OTC ARS is a disclosure pathway for companies that are no longer SEC reporting (like Coretec) to publish financials and regain Pink Current status under Rule 15c2-11.
❌ This does not mean they are becoming SEC-compliant again.
It’s the minimum requirement to resume public quoting — unaudited disclosures posted directly to OTC Markets, not to EDGAR.
• SEC filings (like the Form 10-K) require PCAOB-audited financials, detailed risk disclosures, Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, etc.
• Coretec likely couldn’t afford or chose not to endure the full burden of SEC reporting right now.

✅ Bottom line:
Coretec is taking a non-SEC path to update its disclosures and possibly resume public trading — not returning to full SEC reporting (yet).

That's ok. Let them get back on OTC first and we can all get one more shot at buying up at sub-penny prices before it moves.

looking very promising!

I believe those filings will be submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Because they are subject to SEC Rule 15c2-11, they need to submit an OTC Markets Alternative Reporting Standard (“ARS”). That's how I see it.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sec-form-ars.asp
https://blog.otcmarkets.com/2021/12/15/an-investors-guide-common-issues-with-company-disclosure/

From the 8K

“OTC Markets Alternative Reporting and Financing Authorization

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Board hereby approves the preparation and submission of the Corporation’s OTC Markets Alternative Reporting Standard (“ARS”) disclosure statements (collectively, the “ARS Reports”) for the outstanding reporting periods ended September 30,?2024 and December?31,?2024, and for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2025, together with any required financial statements, certifications, and subsequent amendments;

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Authorized Officers are directed and authorized, in the name and on behalf of the Corporation, to execute, file, and publish such ARS Reports, and any related correspondence or supplemental disclosures with OTC Markets Group Inc., and to take any other action they deem necessary or advisable in connection therewith;

RESOLVED FURTHER, that to fund the preparation of said ARS Reports—including pre-audit services by an audit-preparation firm, PCAOB audit fees, and any related audit costs from a U.S. CPA firm—the Authorized Officers are hereby authorized to negotiate, enter into, and draw upon a loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to US?$300,000 with such lender and upon such terms and conditions as they deem appropriate, and to execute and deliver any and all agreements, promissory notes, certificates, or other instruments, and to take any other actions they deem necessary or advisable to effectuate such financing; and

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Authorized Officers are authorized and directed to allocate the proceeds of such loan facility to the budget for the ARS project and any other outstanding budgetary requirements relating thereto.

8. Authority to Update Corporate Records

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the proper officers of the Corporation are hereby authorized and directed to make all filings and take all other actions necessary or desirable to carry out the intent of these resolutions, including updating the Corporation’s internal records, regulatory filings, website, and public disclosures to reflect the foregoing changes.”

got it - thanks.

This seems like significant progress.

It is linked on the company website.

The problem I see is that they are not working on SEC compliance, just an OTC alternative to get listed back to the pink sheets I believe.

New 8K is out. Appears to cement leadership changes and approve of up to $300k in financing (loans?) as needed to get their filings in order. Two missing quarterly filings from last year and 1Q this year specifically mentioned. Looks like they are done focusing on other endeavors and ready to finally let us know what we're actually invested in. Good news!

https://investors.thecoretecgroup.com/node/8716/html

trying to find it. where is it?

Filing out.. Form 8-K

It appears that dkme.us is parked at GoDaddy, and they can assist you in acquiring the domain for a $99.99 broker fee. Also, if I add dkme.us to Google browser, it redirects me to the GoDaddy website.

https://www.godaddy.com/domainsearch/find?itc=dlp_domain&domainToCheck=dkme.us&tmskey=1dom_03_buydomain.

this loads for me:

https://thecoretecgroup.com/

wouldn't load for me....

There is the possiblity Coretec does not file till the DKME Co LTD revenue can be counted and the Coretec group fully mergers with DKME INC registered Deleware and DKME Co ltd and the Reshaping Core Optics is completed . Ive seen no filings to suggest Coretec is owned by DKME INC . Core Optics is a wholly owned by The Coretec Group Core Optics is the major stack holder as we know in CRTG . DKME INC needs to come under the umbrella of The Coretec Group as does DKME Co Ltd . Our guys may have controlling interest in DKME INC maybe but filings in Delaware dont show the Director name i called them and they said it would not show their name . Time will tell all will be merged together and that takes time . Hopefully they can file soon but the SEC has its rules so they cant just stop and file anytime they want to. I like what i see though and will be watching for more DKME Co Ltd filing and results of their upcoming shareholder meeting one listed in early July and i think something in early June was to be done . Good things ahead as they work trough this pl;an they nicely laid out in the December news release .

The news release in December said Coertec would have revenue from Kib Plug now DKME Co Ltd . There are no filing to suggest that plan has changed . https://thecoretecgroup.com/press-releases/the-coretec-group-secures-controlling-stake-of-multi-national-energy-company-with-over-us70m-in-annual-revenues-strengthens-board-and-introduces-global-expansion-plans/

From the news release in December : Just what does this outcome look like we will find out soon enough .

Reshaping Core Optics for New Horizons

Coretec is restructuring its Core Optics subsidiary, known for its expertise in compact camera modules (CCMs), to maximize efficiency and unlock new revenue streams. By enhancing its capabilities in testing and calibration equipment, Core Optics will play a pivotal role in Coretec’s growth strategy and its expansion into advanced technology markets.

I assumed the Seonkee Kim transition back to Coretec CEO would take place once stepped down as a duel CEO at KIB / now DKME Co ltd . These guys really shuffle around to take and fill different positions as they move this whole reorganization forward of these companies they work with . I noticed this in many of their other endevors as well . Par for the course.

The dkme.us website should load in time this google search brought up :

Privacy Policy | DKME Inc

dkme.us
https://www.dkme.us › privacy
Our company specializes in consulting, product development, and customer support. We tailor our services to fit the unique needs of businesses across ...

I see lots of different headings when i google dkme.us one may be , blog or news or about , this one as we can see says privacy but none of them load and take us to the website. Its intersting that at the same time this dmke.us website link came up a week about 2 weekes ago the Core Optics.us website which i check almost everyday wouldnt load .

Seonkee Kim is back as the CEO, and Neil Kleinman is no longer CFO.
They must be getting close to filing and becoming current with the SEC.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CRTG/profile

Coretec has been much quicker to update the OTC Markets site than its website.
Neil Kleinman has been CFO since the beginning of the year. I think he is just there temporarily to help with the integration.

This is a screenshot I took in early January this year.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2025/5/30/nuxhxScreenshot_12-1-2025_143028_www.otcmarkets.com.jpeg
A day or so later, after the screenshot, they removed Elbert Michael Ussery as CEO.