By Christine Mai-Duc
After losing a difficult battle in Sacramento last year over a
law that could classify their drivers as full-time employees, Lyft
Inc. and Uber Technologies Inc. are signaling they are ready to
spend big against California legislators who opposed them.
Lyft has placed $2 million in a campaign account taking aim at
Tyler Diep, an Orange County assemblyman who was the sole
Republican to vote for the law, known as AB5, according to
campaign-finance records. Uber has contributed $200,000 to a PAC
that opposes Mr. Diep, who faces a contested primary election on
Tuesday, a company spokesman said.
The Lyft-backed committee, called Californians for Independent
Work, has received all of its funding from the ride-hailing company
and has spent more than $328,000 on activities including polling,
digital ads and mailers. One mailer called Mr. Diep's AB5 vote "a
mockery of his campaign pledge to roll back regulations and promote
jobs."
It is by far the largest share of outside spending in the race.
Mr. Diep's campaign has spent only a little more in total so far,
$458,649, while his best-funded primary opponent, fellow Republican
Janet Nguyen, has spent $277,777.
But political experts said it is the $2 million deposited in the
account that is garnering the most attention.
"Throwing down seven figures just shows the rest of the
community that they take this seriously and that they could do
more," said John Thomas, a GOP political consultant who is
unaffiliated with any of the campaigns in Mr. Diep's race. He added
that "$2 million is probably just the tip of the iceberg."
Mr. Diep declined to comment. Ms. Nguyen in a Facebook post
called AB5 "one of the worst and most devastating antibusiness and
antijobs laws that has come out of Sacramento."
Dave Gilliard, a spokesman for Ms. Nguyen's campaign, said
Lyft's spending has helped even the playing field. "We're very
grateful for their support," he added.
The top two vote-getters in the primary, regardless of party,
will advance to the November election.
Lyft, Uber and other Silicon Valley companies have argued that
AB5, passed by a Democratic-controlled legislature and signed by
Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, could take away flexibility for
drivers and force them to work pre-scheduled shifts. Both
ride-hailing companies have maintained their workers are properly
classified and not made them employees since the law took effect
Jan. 1.
"AB5 has put the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of
Californians at risk," said Lyft spokesman Adrian Durbin. "It is a
broken law, and we are giving a louder voice to those who want to
protect their ability to do independent work."
Mr. Durbin said the spending against Mr. Diep should be
considered just the beginning of Lyft's efforts in contested
legislative races and that it is weighing additional targets for
the future.
Uber, meanwhile, has also given $100,000 to a committee called
Keep California Golden, which is spending against several
legislative candidates this cycle. A company spokesman declined to
comment on the spending.
Previously, Lyft had given money directly only to support
legislative incumbents, a traditional route frequently used to seek
influence in California's capital.
"Giving money to sitting elected officials is more of a thank
you. It's a carrot, not a stick, and now they've pulled out the
stick," said Mr. Thomas.
He added that targeting Mr. Diep, whose district political
consultants consider safe for the GOP, wouldn't likely upset
Democratic leaders who control the state's legislative agenda.
Still, the money Lyft has invested hasn't gone unnoticed by
Democrats.
"We assume that they're trying to send a message to all
legislators, Republican or Democrat...to say they're not happy
about how the legislature voted on the issue," said Bill Wong, who
manages political strategy for Assembly Democrats.
Lyft, Uber and several other companies are pushing a November
ballot initiative to exempt themselves from AB5, amassing more than
$110 million for what promises to be a bruising fight with labor
unions. Proponents say they have already collected more than one
million signatures, nearly double the number required to qualify
for the November ballot.
Uber and food-delivery company Postmates Inc. also have filed a
lawsuit challenging the law.
Meanwhile, talks over crafting a compromise to amend AB5 have
stalled in the state legislature. Mr. Durbin and others said that
no negotiations are currently happening between legislators and
companies including Lyft and that none are scheduled.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
March 02, 2020 10:23 ET (15:23 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024