PDCO Patterson Companies Inc

Filed by the Registrant  ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant   ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

July 31, 2020

Dear Shareholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting of shareholders of Patterson Companies, Inc. to be held virtually at 4:30 p.m., Central Daylight Saving Time, on Monday, September 14, 2020. This will be the first time we have held our annual meeting virtually. Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and our desire to support the health and well-being of our shareholders, employees and directors, we have decided not to have a physical annual meeting this year. Instructions regarding virtual attendance are set forth in the Notice below. Shareholders attending the virtual annual meeting online will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote.

The annual meeting will be held for the following purposes: (1) to vote for the election of eight directors, (2) to vote upon an advisory proposal concerning our executive compensation program, and (3) to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending April 24, 2021. I encourage you to vote for the nominees for director, for advisory approval of our executive compensation program, and for ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.

Whether or not you expect to attend the virtual annual meeting online, it is important that your shares be represented and voted. After reading this proxy statement, please promptly vote and submit your proxy. You may vote through the Internet, by telephone, by requesting, signing and returning a proxy card, or online during the virtual annual meeting. Your vote is important.

Very truly yours,

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

 Mark S. Walchirk
President and Chief Executive Officer

Shareholders receiving a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials will find instructions about how to obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials on their notice.

At our virtual annual meeting, shareholders will vote on the following items of business:

Shareholders will also vote on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote:

With respect to any other matter that properly comes before the meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by our Board of Directors or, if no recommendation is given, in their own discretion.

As of July 17, 2020, the record date for the meeting, we had 96,279,152 shares of common stock outstanding and approximately 1,948 shareholders of record. Each share of our common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote on each item being voted on at the meeting. You can vote all the shares that you owned on the record date. These shares include (1) shares held directly in your name as the shareholder of record, and (2) shares held for you as the beneficial owner through a broker, bank or other nominee. Shareholders do not have the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors. Shares are counted as present if either the shareholder votes online at the virtual annual meeting, or has properly submitted a proxy by Internet, by telephone, or by mail.

Whether you hold shares directly as the shareholder of record or through a broker, trustee or other nominee as the beneficial owner, you may direct how your shares are voted without attending the virtual annual meeting. There are three ways to vote by proxy:

By Internet – Shareholders who receive a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions on the notice. Shareholders who receive a paper copy of a proxy card or voting instruction card provided by their broker, trustee or nominee by mail may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction card.

By Telephone – Shareholders of record may submit proxies by telephone by following the instructions set forth on the website listed on the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials or the proxy card. You will need to have the control number that appears on your Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card available when voting by telephone.

By Mail – Shareholders who request and receive a paper copy of the proxy card or the voting instruction card by mail may submit proxies by completing, signing and dating their proxy card or voting instruction card and mailing it in the accompanying pre-addressed envelope.

If you participate in the ESOP or the DPSP, follow the directions on your proxy card to vote shares held for you in your ESOP or DPSP account, and such shares will be voted in accordance with your instructions. If you do not provide instructions on or before Wednesday, September 9, 2020, our Board of Directors will direct Delaware Charter Guarantee & Trust Company dba Principal Trust Company, the trustee of the ESOP, to vote your ESOP shares in accordance with the Board’s recommendations. If you do not provide instructions on or before Wednesday, September 9, 2020, our Board will direct Standard Life Trust Company, the trustee of the DPSP, to vote your DPSP shares in accordance with the Board’s recommendations.

All shareholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend and participate in the virtual annual meeting by accessing www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PDCO2020. To join the annual meeting, you will need to have your 16-digit control number, which is included on your Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials or on your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials). In the even that you do not have a control number, please contact your broker, bank, or other nominee as soon as possible and no later than Wednesday, September 9, 2020, so that you can be provided with a control number and gain access to the meeting. Shareholders may vote electronically and submit questions online while attending the virtual annual meeting.

The live audio webcast of the annual meeting will begin promptly at 4:30 p.m., Central Daylight Saving Time. Online access to the audio webcast will open approximately 15 minutes prior to the start of the annual meeting to allow time for you to log in and test the computer audio system. We encourage our shareholders to access the meeting prior to the start time. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual annual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the online annual meeting login page at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PDCO2020.

To vote your shares online at the virtual annual meeting, please visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PDCO2020 and enter the 16-digit control number included in our Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials or on your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials).

Even if you plan to attend the virtual annual meeting online, we recommend that you vote by proxy in advance of the annual meeting as described above so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the annual meeting. For additional information, please see “How can I vote by proxy in advance of the virtual annual meeting?” above.

To vote your shares without attending the virtual annual meeting, please follow the instructions for Internet or telephone voting contained in the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials. Whether you hold shares directly as a shareholder of record or beneficially in street name, you may direct how your shares are voted without attending the virtual annual meeting online. If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote by submitting a proxy electronically via

the Internet, by telephone, or if you have requested a paper copy of these proxy materials, by returning the proxy card or voting instruction card. If you hold shares beneficially in street name, you may vote by submitting voting instructions to your broker, trustee or nominee. All shares represented by a valid proxy received prior to the annual meeting will be voted.

Yes. If you vote prior to the meeting, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before the votes are cast at the meeting. You may automatically revoke your proxy by attending the virtual annual meeting online and voting online at the meeting. Attending the virtual annual meeting online without voting at such meeting will not in and of itself constitute revocation of a proxy. To revoke your voting instructions, you may submit new voting instructions to your broker, trustee or nominee. Another means to revoke your proxy or change your proxy or voting instructions is to send a written notice via email to investor.relations@pattersoncompanies.com before the beginning of the annual meeting.

The presence at the virtual annual meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of at least a majority of the shares of our common stock outstanding as of the record date will constitute a quorum. There must be a quorum for any action to be taken at the meeting (other than an adjournment or postponement of the meeting). If you submit a properly executed proxy card, even if you abstain from voting, then your shares will be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. Because brokers cannot vote shares on their customers’ behalf on “non-routine” proposals, such as Proposal Nos. 1 and 2 in this proxy statement, without receiving voting instructions from a customer, if a broker does not receive voting instructions from its customer with respect to a non-routine proposal and is precluded from voting on that proposal, then a “broker non-vote” occurs. If a broker returns a proxy indicating a lack of authority to vote on non-routine proposals, the shares represented by the proxy will be deemed present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum, but not present for purposes of calculating the vote on such proposals.

Proposal No. 1. Assuming the presence of a quorum, election as a director requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting. For additional information, please see “How does the director resignation policy work?” below.

Proposal Nos. 2 and 3. Assuming the presence of a quorum, the affirmative vote of the greater of (1) a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the item at the meeting and (2) a majority of the minimum number of shares entitled to vote that would constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the meeting, will be required for approval of each of these proposals.

With respect to the election of directors, the advisory proposal on executive compensation, and the proposal to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP:

If you receive more than one proxy card, it means that you hold shares registered in more than one name or brokerage account. You should sign and return each proxy card that you receive in order to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

With respect to the first proposal, you may vote FOR or AGAINST the nominees, or you may indicate that you wish to ABSTAIN from voting on the nominees. With respect to each of the second and third proposals, you may vote FOR or AGAINST the proposal, or you may indicate that you wish to ABSTAIN from voting on the proposal.

If you vote by proxy, your shares will be voted at the annual meeting in the manner you indicate on your proxy. If you sign a paper proxy card but do not specify how you want your shares to be voted (and you do not hold your shares through a broker, bank or other financial institution), they will be voted (1) FOR election of the nominees named below under the caption “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors;” (2) FOR advisory approval of our executive compensation program; (3) FOR ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending April 24, 2021; and (4) in the discretion of the proxies named on the proxy card with respect to all other appropriate matters properly brought before the annual meeting.

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, any nominee for director in an uncontested election (i.e., an election where the number of nominees is not greater than the number of directors to be elected) who fails to receive the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting shall, promptly following certification of the shareholder vote, offer his or her resignation to our Governance and Nominating Committee. The resignation offer shall be in writing and shall be an irrevocable resignation offer pending acceptance or rejection by our Board of Directors following its receipt of the recommendation of our Governance and Nominating Committee. We will promptly disclose to the public each such resignation and decision by our Board.

All votes will be tabulated by Broadridge Financial Services as the inspector of election for the meeting. Such firm will separately tabulate affirmative and negative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes.

We do not expect any matters to be presented for a vote at the meeting other than the matters described in this proxy statement. If you grant a proxy, either of the proxy holders, Mark S. Walchirk or Les B. Korsh, or his nominee(s) or substitute(s), will have the discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters that are properly presented for a vote at the meeting. If a nominee is not available as a candidate for director, the persons named as proxy holders may vote your proxy for another candidate nominated by our Board of Directors.

We will pay the expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of proxies. We are soliciting proxies principally by mail. In addition, our directors, officers and other employees may solicit proxies personally, by telephone, by facsimile or by e-mail, for which they will receive no consideration other than their regular compensation. We will also request brokerage houses, nominees, custodians and fiduciaries to forward soliciting material to the beneficial owners of shares held as of the record date and will reimburse such persons for their reasonable expenses so incurred.

John D. Buck serves as our non-executive Chairman of the Board. Mr. Buck is the principal owner of Whitefish Ventures, LLC, a family investment fund. He has been its Chief Executive Officer since 2000. Mr. Buck was Chief Executive Officer of Medica, the second largest health benefits plan in Minnesota, from February 2002 to May 2003. From 1996 to 2000, he worked for Fingerhut Companies, Inc. with his last assignment as President and Chief Operating Officer, and played an integral role in developing the business services area of the company. Prior to Fingerhut, Mr. Buck was Vice President of Administration at Alliant Techsystems, a leading supplier of aerospace and defense technologies. Prior to that, Mr. Buck spent 21 years at Honeywell, Inc., including a four-year international posting, and most recently serving as Vice President of Administration. Mr. Buck is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Medica, served as a director of Evine Live, Inc. from 2004 to 2015, and became a director of Round River Research in 2017. He has been one of our directors since December 2006. Mr. Buck brings financial, strategic and leadership experience, including health benefit plan experience, to our Board.

Alex N. Blanco served as Senior Vice President and Chief Supply Chain Officer for Baxter International, a leading provider of products to treat hemophilia, kidney disease, immune disorders and other chronic and acute medical conditions, from March 2020 to June 2020. From January 2013 to March 2020, Mr. Blanco served as Executive Vice President and Chief Supply Chain Officer for Ecolab Inc., a global leader in water, hygiene and energy technologies and services that protect people and vital resources. From 1982 to 2012, Mr. Blanco held senior management positions at Procter & Gamble Co. (“P&G”), with his last position as Vice President Product Supply Global Beauty Sector. In his previous roles, he led the supply chain in other key P&G divisions and also had international assignments, in which Mr. Blanco was based outside of the United States from 1990 to 2004, having spent ten years in South America and four years in Europe, and during which time he had responsibility for Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa. He has been a director of YMCA of the Greater Twin Cities since June 2015. He has been one of our directors since April 2017. Mr. Blanco brings extensive supply chain and international experience to our Board.

Jody H. Feragen served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hormel Foods Corp., a multinational marketer and manufacturer of brand name food and meat products, from November 2010 to October 2016. Ms. Feragen served as Hormel’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from January 2007 to October 2010 and Hormel’s Vice President (Finance) and Treasurer from October 2005 to December 2006. She also served on Hormel’s board of directors from 2007 to 2016. Since September 2015, Ms. Feragen has served as a director, including current service as chair of the audit committee and a member of the nomination and governance committee, of Graco Inc., a supplier of technology and expertise for the management of fluids in both industrial and commercial applications. She has been one of our directors since September 2011. Ms. Feragen brings extensive experience in public company financial management to our Board.

Robert C. Frenzel has served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Xcel Energy Inc. (“Xcel Energy”) since March 2020, where he has responsibility for Xcel Energy’s four utility operating companies, along with the transmission, distribution and natural gas businesses. From May 2016 to March 2020, Mr. Frenzel served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Xcel Energy. From February 2012 to April 2016, Mr. Frenzel served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Luminant, a subsidiary of Energy Future Holdings Corp. (“EFHC”). From February 2009 to February 2012, he served as Senior Vice President for Corporate Development, Strategy and Mergers and Acquisitions for EFHC. In April 2014, EFHC, the majority of its subsidiaries, including Texas Competitive Energy Holdings (“TCEH”), the parent company of Luminant, filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. TCEH emerged from Chapter 11 in October 2016. Earlier in his career, Mr. Frenzel advised corporate clients on strategic and financial transactions as a Vice President in the Investment Banking Division at Goldman Sachs, and consulted in the strategy, finance, and economics practice at Arthur Andersen. Mr. Frenzel also served in the United States Navy for six years as a nuclear engineering officer and weapons officer, and was promoted to lieutenant commander in the Navy Reserve following active duty. He has been one of our directors since March 2018. Mr. Frenzel brings public company executive management, supply chain, strategic merger and acquisition, system implementation and risk management experience to our Board.

Francis J. Malecha has served as Manager of Hidden Lake Vineyard, LLC since March 2020. He previously served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Compass Minerals International, Inc., a leading provider of essential minerals, from January 2013 to November 2018. Previously, Mr. Malecha was Head of Agricultural Products, North America at Glencore International plc. From 2000 to 2013, Mr. Malecha held a series of increasingly senior roles at global agribusiness company Viterra, Inc, culminating in his tenure Chief Operating Officer of the company’s grain division before Viterra was acquired by Glencore. Earlier in his career, Mr. Malecha spent 15 years in the grain division of General Mills, Inc. He has been one of our directors since June 2018. Mr. Malecha brings merchandising, transportation, operations, risk management and international merger and acquisition experience to our Board.

Ellen A. Rudnick has served as Senior Advisor on Entrepreneurship at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business since July 2016. Ms. Rudnick was previously the Executive Director and Clinical Professor of the Polsky Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business since March 1999. She served as Chairman of Pacific Biometrics, a medical diagnostics company which she co-founded, from 1993 to 1999; President of HCIA and CEO of Healthcare Knowledge Resources, both healthcare information service companies, from 1990 to 1992; and in a variety of capacities at Baxter Healthcare from 1975 to 1990, including Corporate Vice President of Baxter Healthcare and President and Founder of Baxter Management Services Division. Ms. Rudnick served as Founder and Chairman of CEO Advisors, a consulting firm established in 1992. Ms. Rudnick serves as director of First Midwest Bancorp, Inc., HMS Holdings Corporation and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. She has been one of our directors since December 2003. Ms. Rudnick brings experience with small businesses (our customer base), the medical products industry, academia and entrepreneurship to our Board.

Neil A. Schrimsher has served as Chief Executive Officer of Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc., one of North America’s largest industrial parts distributors, since October 2011 and was also elected its President in August 2013. From January 2010 to August 2011, Mr. Schrimsher was Executive Vice President of Cooper Industries, a global electrical products manufacturer, where he led multiple businesses in Cooper’s Electrical Products Group and headed numerous domestic and international growth initiatives. Mr. Schrimsher joined Cooper Industries in May 2006 as the President of Cooper Lighting. Mr. Schrimsher’s other experience includes senior leadership positions for Siemens Energy & Automation, part of Siemens AG, the global electronics and electrical engineering company. He began his career at General Electric Company and rose through a succession of positions in GE Lighting. He has served as a director of Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. since October 2011. He has been one of our directors since March 2014. Mr. Schrimsher brings wholesale distribution and executive leadership experience to our Board.

Mark S. Walchirk became our President and Chief Executive Officer in November 2017. Mr. Walchirk previously served as President of U.S. Pharmaceutical at McKesson Corporation from October 2012 to October 2017, where he held responsibility for McKesson’s U.S. Pharmaceutical sales, distribution and customer service operations. Mr. Walchirk joined McKesson in April 2001 and held various leadership positions including President of McKesson Specialty Care Solutions and Chief Operating Officer of McKesson U.S. Pharmaceutical. Before joining McKesson, he spent 13 years in medical-surgical distribution and manufacturing with Baxter Healthcare, Allegiance Healthcare and Encompass Group, holding various leadership positions in sales, marketing, operations and business development. Mr. Walchirk became one of our directors in November 2017. Mr. Walchirk brings strategic and leadership experience, including healthcare services and distribution experience, to our Board.

Election as a director requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting. Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the election of the nominees listed above.

Our Board of Directors represents the interests of our shareholders as a whole and is responsible for directing the management of the business and affairs of our company, as provided by Minnesota law. Our Board held 14 meetings and took action by written consent twice during fiscal 2020. In addition to meetings of the full Board, directors also attended committee meetings. Each director attended at least 75% of all of the meetings of the Board and of those committees on which he or she served.

Our Board is comprised of a majority of independent directors as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Our Board has affirmatively determined the independence under the applicable Marketplace Rule as to each of our directors who are identified as independent directors in the chart that appears below within the subsection captioned “Committee Overview.”

As part of our Board’s evaluation of director independence, they considered our company’s ongoing transactions with Ecolab Inc., where director Alex N. Blanco had been employed as Executive Vice President and Chief Supply Chain Officer until March 2020, and our company’s purchases from Baxter International, where Mr. Blanco had been employed as Senior Vice President and Chief Supply Chain Officer from March 2020 to June 2020. Our Board reviewed such transactions and determined that they were entered into and provided in the ordinary course of business and were immaterial to either company’s revenues or operations.

The independent members of our Board meet in executive session at each regular meeting of our Board, with no members of management present.

Our company and our Board are members of the National Association of Corporate Directors (“NACD”). Our Board authorizes, recommends and encourages each Board member and our company’s senior management to attend educational courses offered by the NACD or similar accredited educational organization. We reimburse reasonable expenses incurred by our directors and senior management in attending such courses.

Our company has adopted and published Principles of Business Conduct and Code of Ethics. Our Principles of Business Conduct and Code of Ethics satisfy the requirements of Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K and applicable NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. Our Principles of Business Conduct and Code of Ethics are available on our website at www.pattersoncompanies.com or in print upon written request to Patterson Companies, Inc., 1031 Mendota Heights Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55120, Attention: Investor Relations. We intend to disclose any amendment to or waiver from a provision of our Principles of Business Conduct and Code of Ethics that requires disclosure on our website at www.pattersoncompanies.com.

Our company also has adopted and published Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines address various governance topics, including the role of our Board of Directors, the composition of our Board and selection of directors, functioning of our Board and its committees, compensation of directors, and conduct and ethics standards for directors. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website at www.pattersoncompanies.com or in print upon written request to Patterson Companies, Inc., 1031 Mendota Heights Road, St. Paul, MN 55120, Attention: Investor Relations.

Our Board of Directors, which elects its Chairman annually by a majority vote, does not have a fixed policy regarding whether the same person should serve as both the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and our Board believes that flexibility on this point best serves our company by allowing us to employ a leadership structure that is most appropriate under the circumstances at any given time.

We currently believe that bifurcating the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, as well as the oversight exercised by the independent members of our Board through the work of the committees of our Board discussed below, enables strong and dynamic Board leadership, and effectively allocates authority, responsibility and oversight between management and the independent members of our Board. Our Board has the discretion to combine the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board in the future if it deems it advisable and in the best interest of our company to do so.

The separation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions allows our Chairman to focus on governance of our Board, Board meeting agenda planning, Board committee succession planning, the recruitment of new directors, Board committee responsibilities, and other governance matters as further described below under the caption “Role of Non-Executive Chairman,” and our Chief Executive Officer to focus his attention on our business and execution of our company’s strategy. The Chairman also has an important role in the performance evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer, which helps the Governance and Nominating Committee evaluate the most effective Board leadership structure for our company. Our Board believes that these and other activities of the Chairman serve to enhance the independent leadership of the Board in order to provide robust oversight and promote overall Board effectiveness. Mr. Buck has an extensive leadership background, is actively engaged as Chairman on Board matters, and works closely with Mr. Walchirk. Mr. Buck frequently interacts with Mr. Walchirk and other members of management to provide his perspective on important issues facing our company and the informational needs of our Board. In addition to the Governance and Nominating Committee, which he chairs, and the Compliance Committee, where he currently serves as a member, Mr. Buck routinely attends the meetings of our Board’s other committees and frequently communicates with the chairs of those committees and with other independent directors both inside and outside of our Board’s normal meeting schedule to discuss Board and company issues as they arise. In addition, our Board has a significant majority of independent directors and all Board committees are comprised of independent directors.

Senior management is primarily responsible for assessing and managing risk. Risk oversight is provided by a combination of our full Board and its committees. As part of its oversight, our Board meets regularly to discuss the strategic direction and the issues and opportunities facing our company, including the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically regarding COVID-19, our Board has been actively overseeing our company’s response, including receiving regular updates from and having discussions with senior management. The Board’s review and discussions around this ongoing crisis span a broad range of matters, including protecting the health and safety of our employees, supporting our employees, evaluating the impact of the pandemic on strategy, operations, liquidity and financial matters, interruptions in the industries in which our products are used (including the closure of dental practices, veterinary practices and meat production facilities), limited supply of personal protective equipment needed by dental practices, minimizing supply chain disruption, interruptions in the financial markets, and monitoring continued compliance with applicable laws.

Throughout the year, our Board provides guidance to senior management regarding strategy and critically reviews operating plans that are intended to implement that strategy. Our Board periodically holds meetings with senior management dedicated to discussing and reviewing operating plans and overall corporate strategy. A discussion of key risks to the plans and strategy as well as risk mitigation plans and activities is conducted during that meeting. The involvement of our Board in setting business strategy is critical to the determination of the types and appropriate levels of risk undertaken by our company. Our Board’s oversight includes its receipt and review of reports on data protection and cybersecurity matters from our information technology department. Also, more particularly, and as discussed below, our Audit Committee focuses on oversight of financial risks relating to our company; our Compensation Committee focuses primarily on risks relating to remuneration of officers and other employees; our Governance and Nominating Committee focuses on reputational and corporate governance risks relating to our company; our Finance and Corporate Development Committee focuses on risks associated with our capital structure, capital budget, capital expenditures, issuance and repurchase of securities, acquisitions and divestitures, and corporate investment and treasury policy; and our Compliance Committee focuses on oversight of matters related to the company’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

The role of non-executive Chairman is designed to provide leadership to our Board and to provide support and advice to our Chief Executive Officer. The role is intended to foster an environment conducive to effective communication by and among our Directors and senior management. The non-executive Chairman performs such duties and responsibilities as our Board may determine appropriate, including the following:

The current standing committees of our Board of Directors are the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Finance and Corporate Development Committee and the Compliance Committee. Each committee consists solely of members who are independent as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market. In addition, each member of our Audit Committee is independent as defined in Exchange Act Rule 10A-3 and each member of our Compensation Committee is a non-employee director under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Each standing committee has a charter, all of which are available on our website at http://investor.pattersoncompanies.com/governance.cfm or in print upon written request to Patterson Companies, Inc., 1031 Mendota Heights Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55120, Attention: Investor Relations. Such committees review and reassess the adequacy of their respective charters and recommend any changes to them at least annually. These charters were last reviewed and revised in June 2020. Our committees also engage in an annual review of committee performance.

The following table shows the current membership of our standing committees and identifies our independent directors:

The Board sets the annual schedule of standing committee meetings, with regularly scheduled meetings held adjacent to our Board’s regularly scheduled meetings. In addition to meetings set by the Board, each standing committee shall meet, either by phone or in person, when and as often as the chairperson of each committee deems appropriate. The chairperson of each standing committee, with the advice and consultation of management and the committees’ outside advisors, if any, sets the agenda for each meeting. Committee members receive detailed materials related to the topics on the agenda prior to each meeting.

Company Accounting Oversight Board. In addition, the committee has discussed with EY the firm’s independence from management and our company, including the matters in the written disclosures and the letter the committee received from EY as required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, and considered the compatibility of non-audit services performed by EY during the year on such firm’s independence prior to the commencement of the non-audit services.

Our Audit Committee is committed to ensuring the independence of our company’s independent registered public accountants and directs significant attention toward the appropriateness of the outside auditor to perform services other than the audit. The committee has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures in this regard.

As a matter of policy, the independent registered public accountants will only be engaged for non-audit related work if those services enhance and support the attest function of the audit, are an extension to the audit or audit related services, or relate to tax matters. Annually, the lead audit partner reviews with the Audit Committee the services the outside auditor expects to provide in the coming year, and the related fees. In addition, management provides the committee with a quarterly status for the committee’s approval of any non-audit services that the outside auditor has been asked to provide or may be asked to provide in the next quarter. The committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided by the company’s outside auditor.

Our Chief Financial Officer is responsible for the implementation of the Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures. The committee pre-approved all of the services we received from EY during fiscal 2020.

The Audit Committee discussed with our company’s internal auditors and EY the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The committee meets with the internal auditors and EY, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of our company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of our company’s financial reporting.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board (and our Board approved) that our audited consolidated financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 25, 2020, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Audit Committee and our Board have recommended and seek shareholder ratification of the selection of EY as our company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending April 24, 2021. In making this recommendation, the committee evaluated the independence of EY, their knowledge and experience with our company, the quality of their past work for our company, their industry knowledge, data relating to their audit quality and performance and the level of fees to be charged for the audit services. The committee and our Board believe that the appointment of EY as our company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of our shareholders and our company.

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Robert C. Frenzel, Chair
/s/ Alex N. Blanco
/s/ Jody H. Feragen
/s/ Francis J. Malecha
The Audit Committee

Responsibilities and Composition. Our Compensation Committee, chaired by Ms. Rudnick, is authorized by our Board to set the annual compensation of each of our executive officers, to grant stock options, restricted stock and other awards to employees under our Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and to review and approve our compensation and benefit plans. Our Compensation Committee held seven meetings and took action by written consent twice during fiscal 2020.

Our Board has determined that each member of our Compensation Committee is independent of management and our company. Further, as noted above, each member of the committee is an independent director and is a non-employee director under the applicable rules of NASDAQ and the Securities and Exchange Commission, respectively.

The Compensation Committee has the dual responsibility of serving the interests of our shareholders and serving as an advisor to management. The committee assists our Board in fulfilling its responsibility to our shareholders so that our executive officers and certain other officers and managers are compensated in accordance with our company’s total compensation objectives and executive compensation policy. Management assists the committee by advising and recommending compensation policies, strategies and pay levels necessary to establish appropriate incentives for management and employees that are aligned with business strategies and goals that the committee believes will drive competitive advantage and deliver sustainable returns to shareholders. Other than as permitted under the Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the committee does not delegate any of its duties or responsibilities to any subcommittee or other person. The committee’s specific responsibilities include:

In fulfilling its duties and responsibilities, the Compensation Committee may hire independent consultants, confer with our internal human resource professionals and consult with our Chief Executive Officer and other members of management. In the most recently completed fiscal year, the committee engaged and worked with Pearl Meyer, an independent compensation consultant that has no other ties to our company or its management, to review compensation philosophy, competitiveness, pay for performance, and short term and long term compensation design. The committee believes that Pearl Meyer is independent of our management. Our management has not engaged Pearl Meyer to provide any other services to our company.

During the Compensation Committee meetings held in fiscal 2020, certain members of management were present to address specific topics within the scope of their responsibilities. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, our Chief Human Resources Officer and our Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary attended several of the meetings to provide certain recommendations to the committee regarding the compensation of other executive officers and to discuss the financial implications of various compensatory awards and benefit programs. No such executive officer was present during the committee’s discussion and determination of his or her respective compensation.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. The members of our Compensation Committee are identified by name in the “Compensation” column of the chart that appears above within the subsection captioned “Committee Overview.” None of the members of the committee was an officer or employee of Patterson Companies, Inc. during fiscal 2020 or in any prior year, and none of the members of the committee had any relationship requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. There were no Compensation Committee interlocks as described in Item 407(e)(4) of Regulation S-K.

Compensation Committee Report. Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” that appears herein with management. Based on such review and discussions, the committee recommended to our Board that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this proxy statement and, thereby, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 25, 2020.

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Ellen A. Rudnick, Chair
/s/ Alex N. Blanco
/s/ Francis J. Malecha
/s/ Neil A. Schrimsher
The Compensation Committee

Responsibilities and Composition. Our Governance and Nominating Committee, chaired by John D. Buck, performs the core function of providing the overall protocol for Board operation to improve the effectiveness of the Board. It also serves as the nominating committee, making recommendations as to nominees to serve as members of our Board and regarding the composition of the committees of our Board. The committee’s responsibilities include establishing criteria for Board and committee membership, considering rotation of committee members, reviewing candidates’ qualifications and any potential conflicts with our interests, assessing the contributions of current directors in connection with their

re-nomination, and making recommendations to the full Board on how to improve the effectiveness of our Board. The committee believes that diversity of viewpoints, backgrounds, skills, experience and expertise is a key attribute for directors. As a result, the committee seeks to have a diverse Board that is representative of our company’s customer, employee and shareholder base. The committee carefully considers diversity when considering nominees for director and periodically reviews its recruitment and selection protocols to ensure that diversity remains a component of each director search.

Our Governance and Nominating Committee has identified nominees based upon suggestions by non-employee directors, executive officers, shareholders and third-party search firms. Our director selection criteria includes: integrity; high level of education; business experience; broad-based business acumen; understanding of our business and industry; strategic thinking and willingness to share ideas; network of contacts; and diversity of experiences, expertise and backgrounds among members; balanced representation of the best interests of the company’s shareholders as a whole rather than special constituencies; and any potential conflicts with the company’s interests. The committee has used these criteria to evaluate potential nominees. The committee does not evaluate proposed nominees differently depending upon who has made the recommendation.

Our Governance and Nominating Committee has from time to time engaged third-party search firms to provide assistance in the identification and evaluation of potential nominees, whose qualifications and independence are then thoroughly evaluated by the committee. The committee has paid fees to third-party search firms for such assistance.

It is our Governance and Nominating Committee’s policy to consider director candidates recommended by shareholders who appear to be qualified to serve on our Board. The committee may choose not to consider an unsolicited recommendation if no vacancy exists on our Board and the committee does not perceive a need to increase the size of our Board. The committee will consider only those director candidates recommended in accordance with the procedures set forth below.

Nomination Procedures. To submit a recommendation of a director candidate to our Governance and Nominating Committee, a shareholder must submit the following information in writing, addressed to our Chairman of the Board, care of our Corporate Secretary, at the main office of Patterson Companies, Inc.:

Our Bylaws provide that in order for a person nominated by a shareholder to be eligible for election as a director at any regular or special meeting of shareholders, a written request that his or her name be placed in nomination must be received from a shareholder of record by our Corporate Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the date fixed for the meeting, together with the written consent of such person to serve as a director. A copy of our Bylaws may be obtained by written request to Patterson Companies, Inc., 1031 Mendota Heights Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55120, Attn: Les B. Korsh, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.

Minimum Qualifications. In carrying out its responsibility to find the best-qualified persons to serve as directors, our Governance and Nominating Committee will consider appropriate data with respect to each suggested candidate, consisting of business experience, educational background, current directorships, involvement in legal proceedings during the last ten years which are material to the evaluation of the integrity of the candidate, and an indication of the willingness of the candidate to serve as a director.

In addition, prior to nominating an existing director for re-election to our Board, our Governance and Nominating Committee will consider and review an existing director’s Board and committee attendance and performance; length of Board service; experience, skills and contributions that the existing director brings to our Board; and his or her independence. Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, independent directors generally may not stand for election following their attaining the age of 75, or 20 years of service as a director on our Board.

Our Governance and Nominating Committee is also responsible for overseeing and reviewing our processes for providing information to our Board. The committee completes an annual review of the performance of our Chief Executive Officer. In addition, the committee recommends a succession plan to our Board for our Chief Executive Officer and reviews programs created and maintained by management for the development and succession of other executive officers and other individuals identified by management or the committee. The committee develops and oversees a company orientation program for new directors and a continuing education program for current directors. The committee also sets director compensation. The committee held four meetings during fiscal 2020.

In June 2020, the committee’s charter was revised to provide that the committee shall advise the Board on matters of environmental and social governance that are of strategic significance to the company, provide oversight of the company’s sustainability, corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship matters, and maintain an informed status on such matters through discussions and receipt of reports from management.

Purpose. Our Finance and Corporate Development Committee, chaired by Ms. Feragen, oversees our company’s capital structure, capital budget and capital expenditures, issuance and repurchase of equity and debt, and acquisitions and divestitures, and corporate investment and treasury policy and their consistency with our company’s overall financial and strategic plans.

Responsibilities and Organization. The responsibilities of our Finance and Corporate Development Committee include:

Our Finance and Corporate Development Committee reports to our Board on the principal matters reviewed or approved at each meeting and provides recommendations as to actions to be taken by our Board. The committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any outside financial or other consultants to assist in carrying out its duties, including the authority to approve consultant fees and other retention terms. The committee has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal, financial or other advisors. In addition, the committee has the authority to delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees, as it deems appropriate, subject to the requirements of applicable laws and regulations. The committee held five meetings during fiscal 2020.

Purpose. Our Compliance Committee, chaired by Mr. Schrimsher, is authorized by our Board to oversee and monitor matters relating to our company’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations in all jurisdictions in which we operate, other than those matters reserved for the Audit Committee. Management has primary responsibility for compliance with relevant laws, our company’s Compliance Program and other relevant standards.

Our company’s Compliance Program includes, solely as related to compliance, the following topics: antitrust; Code of Ethics; conflicts of interest; Controlled Substances Act and related DEA requirements; consumer protection; customs and trade, including import and export matters; data privacy and data security; ethics; environment; False Claims Act; FDA regulations and requirements, including the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-bribery laws; Fraud and Abuse Laws, including the Anti-Kickback Statute; government relations; health and safety; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act; interactions with healthcare professionals; information systems security; labor and employment; physical security; quality; recalls; regulatory compliance; sales of products or services to U.S. or foreign governments, including entities owned by such governments; Sunshine Act and other laws relating to reporting of and transparency with respect to payments to healthcare professionals; transportation; and such other matters as may be requested by the Compliance Committee.

Responsibilities and Organization. The responsibilities of our Compliance Committee include:

Our Compliance Committee reports to our Board on the principal matters reviewed or approved at each meeting and provides recommendations as to actions to be taken by our Board. The committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any outside financial or other consultants to assist in carrying out its duties, including the authority to approve consultant fees and other retention terms. The committee has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal, financial or other advisors. In addition, the committee has the authority to delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees, as it deems appropriate, subject to the requirements of applicable laws and regulations. The committee, which was initially created in December 2019, held one meeting during fiscal 2020.

Our Board of Directors has provided the following process for interested persons to send communications to our Board or individual directors. All communications from shareholders should be addressed to Patterson Companies, Inc., 1031 Mendota Heights Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55120, Attention: Les B. Korsh, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Communications to individual directors may also be made to such director at our company’s address. All communications sent to the chair of our Audit Committee or to any individual director will be received directly by such individuals and will not be screened or reviewed by any company personnel. Any communications sent to our Board in the care of our Corporate Secretary will be reviewed by him to ensure that such communications relate to the business of our company or its subsidiaries before being reviewed by our Board.

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, it is our policy that all directors should be present at the annual meeting of shareholders. We generally hold a Board of Directors meeting coincident with the shareholders’ meeting to facilitate their attendance at the shareholders’ meeting. All directors then in office attended the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders.

70,445 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts and that Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard, is the beneficial owner of 24,632 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings. The reporting person’s address is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and provide us with copies of such reports. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required for those persons, we believe that, during the past fiscal year, our officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders complied with applicable filing requirements, except that one Form 4 report for each of Messrs. Walchirk, Zurbay, Korsh, Pohlman and Ms. Frohning reporting the June 11, 2019 determination by the Compensation Committee that the performance criteria for the period of April 29, 2018 through April 27, 2019 applicable to non-derivative performance units issued on August 7, 2018 had been satisfied, was not filed on a timely basis.

The management team drove many positive developments in fiscal 2020 and the overall value of our fiscal 2020 executive compensation package was above the targeted level, reflecting financial performance that, despite the goodwill impairment and the emerging impact of COVID-19, exceeded our objectives.

Base Salary. At the beginning of 2020, we made base salary adjustments reflecting a combination of factors including internal equity, positioning against external benchmarks, experience in role, and individual performance.

Annual Short-Term and Long-Term Incentives. During fiscal 2020, we continued to emphasize the importance of fiscal 2020 operational results to our company’s long-term success by aligning executive compensation with enterprise performance objectives and individual accountabilities.

As shown in the charts below for Mark S. Walchirk, our Chief Executive Officer, and our other named executive officers, fiscal 2020 actual total direct compensation was above target pay levels as our performance was above target and a significant portion of the total pay opportunity is earned over the long-term. Actual compensation reflects our base salaries, funding of our MICP on our financial performance metrics, funding decisions for each named executive officer on the individual component of our MICP, performance units earned based on fiscal 2020 performance (valued at our fiscal year-end stock price), and the other long-term incentives we granted in fiscal 2020 as shown in the Grants of Plan-based Awards Table.

 

The committee is responsible for the review and approval of all aspects of the executive compensation program. The committee meets regularly each year to (among other items):

When making individual compensation decisions for the executives, the committee takes many factors into account. These factors include objective and subjective considerations of each individual’s skills, performance and level of contribution towards desired business objectives, our company’s overall performance, retention concerns, the individual’s tenure and experience with our company and in his or her current position, the recommendations of management and the independent compensation consultant, the individual’s current and historical compensation, the committee’s compensation philosophy, and comparisons to other comparably situated executives (both those of our company and those of peer companies). The committee’s process utilizes input, analysis and review from a number of sources, including our company’s management,

other independent directors of the Board, the committee’s independent compensation consultant, and market studies and other comparative compensation information as discussed below.

The committee uses this information in conjunction with its own review of the various components of our executive compensation program to determine the base salary and annual short-term and long-term incentive targets and opportunities of the executive officers as a group and individually.

The committee meets with the Chief Executive Officer annually to review the performance of the other executives. The meeting includes a discussion of each executive officer’s performance for the year and a review of individual contributions towards achievement of our business goals. A summary of the performance review is presented to the full Board each year.

The committee considers input from the Chief Executive Officer and other select executives when developing and selecting metrics and performance objectives that may be referenced in the annual short-term or long-term incentive program, and evaluating performance against such pre-established metrics and objectives. The committee also receives recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer regarding base salary amounts, annual short-term and long-term incentive award amounts for the other executive officers. In determining the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, the committee considers comparative compensation information and input from its independent compensation consultant.

During fiscal 2020, the committee retained Pearl Meyer as its independent compensation consultant. The committee reviewed and confirmed the independence of such firm. The compensation consultant provides the committee with an annual compensation market analysis for the executives; makes recommendations on the executive pay programs; reviews, participates and comments on executive compensation matters; and provides updates on regulatory changes in compensation related issues and other developments and trends in executive compensation.

The committee reviews recommendations from the independent compensation consultant on a peer group of companies about which competitive compensation data is obtained. There was one change to such peer group for fiscal 2020 decision-making when Essendant Inc. was replaced with Covetrus, Inc. The peer group companies had annual revenue ranging from $2.9 billion to $11.2 billion (median $4.8 billion) and market capitalization ranging from $0.5 billion to $17.3 billion (median $4.9 billion). Both management and the committee believe that the resulting peer group of 16 companies provided a robust statistical set of compensation data to serve as a basis for fiscal 2020 compensation decisions.

The companies comprising the peer group used to establish fiscal 2020 compensation opportunities of the named executive officers are listed below:

In connection with compensation decisions the committee made for fiscal 2020, the committee worked with its independent compensation consultant in the peer group development process.

The reports furnished by the compensation consultant provided the committee with market information at the 25^th, 50^th, and 75^th percentiles for each executive position and pay component, and for total direct compensation, and compared the market compensation data to current pay for each executive. This market information is an important element reviewed by the committee, and provides a basis for adjusting a component of pay, or total direct compensation generally, above or below these ranges to recognize the specific circumstances of individual executive officers in a manner consistent with the stated objectives of the compensation program.

We continue to consider the perspectives of our shareholders in the design and administration of our executive compensation programs. Historically, Patterson’s shareholders have provided strong support of our executive compensation programs with the overwhelming majority of shares voted at our annual meetings approving, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. At last year’s annual meeting, our proposal regarding advisory approval of executive compensation was approved by 87.8% of the shares voted on such proposal.

During fiscal 2020, as part of our efforts to continuously improve our governance practices, we conducted targeted shareholder engagement with certain of our institutional investors. Members of our management team and committee met with shareholders and discussed several elements of our executive compensation strategy.

The committee is guided by the following objectives that it believes are key to the successful execution of our strategic business imperatives, enhancing growth opportunities and providing benefits to our shareholders:

 

The committee has not yet taken any action with respect to fiscal 2021 base salaries for our named executive officers. However, as part of our broad-based effort to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented certain cost reduction measures, including a temporary 35% reduction in Mr. Walchirk’s base salary and a temporary 30% reduction in the base salaries of the other named executive officers. These base salary reductions, which are in effect from May 1, 2020 through July 31, 2020, will not modify the rights our executives may have with respect to the calculation of any annual or long-term incentive awards or severance.

The named executive officers are eligible to earn annual cash incentive compensation under the MICP. A cash incentive is payable if a threshold level of performance is achieved, and the ultimate payout varies with performance.

Consistent with the approach taken in fiscal year 2019, the committee determined that annual cash incentives for fiscal 2020, if any, would be earned on the basis of adjusted operating income weighted at 60%, free cash flow weighted at 25%, and individual performance objectives weighted at 15%. Such weightings were made to (1) emphasize the importance of fiscal 2020 operational results to our company’s long-term success, (2) align executive compensation with enterprise performance objectives and individual accountabilities, (3) maintain our ability to attract and retain executive talent, and (4) in consideration of existing best practices around key design features.

On the financial performance objectives, incentive payouts under the MICP for our named executive officers, other than Mr. Shirley, vary according to performance outcomes as follows:

As shown in the table above, based on the committee’s determination of actual results for fiscal 2020, the financial performance metrics under the MICP for our named executive officers, other than Mr. Shirley, funded at 125% of target.

Mr. Shirley’s MICP opportunity, in his role as President of Patterson Dental, is tied to a different set of financial performance metrics. The committee took similar action with respect to the alignment of financial performance objectives to which Mr. Shirley’s compensation is tied and used a combination of enterprise financial objectives and financial objectives specific to our Dental unit. The financial performance objectives for Mr. Shirley under the MICP vary according to performance outcomes as follows:

As shown in the table above, for fiscal 2020, the financial performance metrics under the MICP for Mr. Shirley funded at 106% of target.

In addition to these financial performance objectives, the committee included individual performance goals and objectives for each named executive officer. This individual element accounts for 15% of the target annual incentive opportunity.

Fiscal 2020 incentive payments across our MICP for each named executive officer are reviewed in the following table:

* Note: the values in this table may not exactly equal the Summary Compensation Table due to rounding.

Fiscal 2020 performance units were earned based on one-year adjusted net income and one-year consolidated free cash flow, each weighted 50%. Such weightings were selected to emphasize the importance of fiscal 2020 operational results to our company’s long-term success, to better align executive compensation with enterprise performance objectives, and because both measures are key drivers of shareholder value.

As shown in the table below, based on our actual performance in fiscal 2020, the performance unit element of our long-term incentive plan funded at 142.5% of target.

Restricted stock unit equivalents issued as a result of our performance will vest in full and automatically convert into shares three years after the date of original grant.

Stock options continue to be an important element of our long-term incentive strategy as they create direct alignment between management and shareholder interests. Multi-year vesting requirements require long-term growth in our stock price for our executives to receive value from these awards. Stock options granted in fiscal 2020 under our long-term incentive program vest one-third each year, starting one year after grant, and expire after 10 years.

While the committee adheres to an overall executive compensation program that is heavily performance-based, we also recognize our objectives of leadership retention and stock ownership. Therefore, 25% of the long-term incentive value is delivered in service-based RSUs. RSUs granted in fiscal 2020 under our long-term incentive program vest in full on the third anniversary of the grant date.

We believe that the design of these elements of long-term incentive compensation inspire a long-term perspective, encourage shareholder value creation and align the interests of management and shareholders.

As we execute against our strategic business objectives, we continue to review our incentive compensation structure to ensure it is consistent with our compensation philosophy and strategy and supports our commitment to create value for all shareholders. In making changes to our incentive programs for fiscal 2021, we took into consideration feedback from our institutional investors as collected during our shareholder outreach process, feedback from outside proxy advisor constituencies, and a review of peer company incentive plan design practices.

The COVID-19 pandemic that emerged in March 2020 created broad economic uncertainty for our company and our customers. This uncertainty and the challenges that it created for our business is reflected in our suspension of earnings guidance and is further reflected in changes to our incentive structure for fiscal 2021.

Our fiscal 2021 MICP was simplified to focus solely on our ability to drive adjusted operating income. Actual MICP payments will be made based on our adjusted operating income against goals and an assessment of each executives’ performance against individual performance goals and objectives.

Our fiscal 2021 long-term incentive plan maintained the same incentive vehicle mix and weights that were used for our fiscal 2020 long-term incentive construct: 50% of long-term incentive opportunities delivered in performance units, 25% delivered in stock options, and the final 25% delivered in restricted stock units.

The performance unit component is based on a 3-year performance cycle with goals set at the beginning of each year in the cycle. Metrics for the 1^st year of the 3-year cycle include adjusted net income and enterprise free cash flow, each weighted 50%. Total shares earned over the 3-year cycle will then be subject to a 3-year relative TSR modifier based on Patterson’s TSR against the S&P 400.

This revised structure addresses the feedback we have received regarding our existing incentive compensation plans in that it (1) eliminates the overlap in using free-cash flow for both our MICP and performance unit grants, (2) introduces a relative performance component, and (3) is based on a multi-year performance measurement period.

The committee believes this revised incentive framework for fiscal 2021 addresses the challenges and uncertainty created by COVID-19 and remains strongly aligned with shareholder interests.

We maintain an executive nonqualified deferred compensation plan under which our named executive officers may participate. We do not make any contributions to such plan and all amounts outstanding thereunder consist solely of participant contributions and are fully vested. The amounts deferred into such plan may become payable during employment upon designated fixed payment dates or following a termination of employment (subject to a six-month delay in certain circumstances) or a change in control of our company. Further information regarding nonqualified deferred compensation is reported in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table below.

Patterson formerly made available a deferred compensation, restricted stock purchase plan (the “Capital Accumulation Plan”). Under the Capital Accumulation Plan, participants could defer annually up to 25% of their pre-tax compensation to be used to purchase shares of restricted stock. The stock purchased with the corresponding salary deferral was bought at a 25% discount from the market price of our common stock at the beginning of the calendar year or the end of the calendar year, whichever was lower. Participants elected the initial deferral period between three and five years. Participants could elect to defer the compensation beyond the initial deferral period, with the restrictions also continuing for the additional deferral period, with the minimum additional deferral period being five years. If the participant voluntarily left employment during the initial deferral period, 100% of the purchased restricted stock and any salary deferred were forfeited. The Capital Accumulation Plan was terminated for new participants, effective January 1, 2019.

Patterson provides a full range of benefits to its executives, including the standard medical, dental and disability benefits generally available to our employees. We also sponsor a qualified 401(k) plan which allows participants to make plan contributions on a pre-tax basis.

Patterson provides the named executive officers with the following perquisites and other personal benefits that the committee believes are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation philosophy:

We believe that promoting share ownership aligns the interests of our executives and non-employee directors with those of our shareholders and provides strong motivation to build shareholder value. Under our stock ownership guidelines, which were last reviewed and revised by the committee in June 2020, the following persons are expected to own shares of a value equal to a multiple of their annual base pay, or annual cash retainer, as follows:

Executives and non-employee directors are expected to achieve target levels over a period of five years from the effective date of the guidelines. If an executive or non-employee director is below the guideline, he or she is expected to retain 50% of the net shares (after satisfying tax obligations) resulting from the vesting, settlement or exercise, as applicable, of all stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance stock units, or other equity-based awards. As of July 17, 2020, our executives and directors were in compliance with applicable stock ownership guidelines.

Our Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which replaced our Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (under which no new awards may be granted), contains “clawback” provisions. If the committee determines that a participant has taken any action that would constitute “cause” or an “adverse action,” as the plan defines such terms, while providing services to the company, or after termination of such services, all rights of the participant under the plan and any agreements evidencing an incentive award the participant then holds will terminate and be forfeited. In addition, the committee may require the participant to return to the company any shares received, any profits or any other economic value realized by the participant in connection with any awards or any shares issued upon the exercise or vesting of any awards. In addition, the plan incorporates the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 automatic forfeiture standard for certain participants in connection with material noncompliance, as a result of misconduct, resulting in an accounting restatement. In addition, all awards under the plan are subject to forfeiture or other penalties pursuant to any clawback or forfeiture policy of the company, as in effect from time to time, and such forfeiture and/or penalty conditions or provisions as determined by the committee and set forth in the applicable award agreement.

Our Securities Trading and Information Disclosure Policy prohibits short sales of company securities (a sale of securities which are not then owned) and other speculative trading of company securities. No director, officer or other employee is permitted to enter into any arrangement or agreement involving writing or trading in options, warrants, puts, calls or other derivative securities on company securities, to engage in any hedging transactions including the use of prepaid variable

forwards, equity swaps, collars or exchange funds, or to hold company securities in a margin account or otherwise pledge company securities as collateral for a loan. In addition, such policy discourages the use of standing and limit orders on company securities, except under an approved Rule 10b5-1 plan.

Patterson has agreements with its named executive officers providing them with certain severance and change-in-control benefits in exchange for their agreement to certain restrictive covenants. When establishing those benefits and the level of those benefits, the committee considered the competitive market for comparable executives and the benefits provided by comparable companies. The committee believes that competition for executive talent primarily affects the aggregate level of the target total direct compensation opportunity. However, the committee also believes it is critical to our company’s long-term performance to offer other compensation opportunities, including severance and change-in-control benefits, that are broadly commensurate with competitive alternatives. The committee also believes that the issuance of inducement equity awards and other one-time equity awards as consideration for the restrictive covenants contained in such agreements serves to align named executive officer and shareholder interests and, as to the inducement awards, were necessary to attract and retain senior executive talent. In the context of Chief Executive Officer transition, the committee further considered the importance of having such agreements in place with the broader executive leadership team given that, prior to entry into Mr. Walchirk’s employment agreement, the company did not previously have such agreements with its leaders.

In particular, we have entered into individual agreements with our named executive officers that provide for severance benefits upon involuntary termination without cause. Such benefits, receipt of which is conditioned upon executive’s execution and delivery of a release of all potential claims against us, consist of:

Our individual agreements with our named executive officers also provide certain change-in-control benefits, in lieu of the above-referenced severance benefits, that are triggered if either of the following occurs within 24 months after a change in control (as defined in each agreement):

Such change-in-control benefits, receipt of which is also conditioned upon executive’s execution and delivery of a release of potential claims against us, consist of:

The committee designed these agreements to help ensure that our executive team is able to evaluate objectively whether a potential change in control transaction is in the best interests of Patterson and its shareholders, without having to be

concerned about their future employment. We believe that retaining the services of our key executives during a change-in-control scenario is critical to maximizing shareholder value. These agreements help ensure the continued services of our executive officers throughout the change in control transaction by giving them incentives to remain with us rather than seeking alternative employment or being recruited to a competitor during a highly uncertain time. Our agreements providing for change-in-control benefits do not contain excess parachute payment tax gross-up provisions.

The committee reviewed prevalent market practices in determining the severance amounts and the events that trigger payments under the agreements. The committee determined that the amounts and triggering events were appropriate and designed to encourage decision-making that is in the best interest of Patterson. The committee considered competitive market data and governance best practices information provided by Pearl Meyer. The committee also evaluated the cost to us of these arrangements and the potential payout levels to each affected executive officer under various scenarios. In approving these agreements, the committee determined that their cost to us and our shareholders was reasonable and not excessive, given the benefit conferred on us. See “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” for further information regarding such agreements.

Our equity plans and inducement awards issued outside such plans also provide change-in-control benefits. As described below, our Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan only provides such benefits in connection with a change in control and a subsequent event (a “double trigger”), which we believe enables us to better balance the employee’s need for certainty with the interests of our shareholders.

The committee annually considers the designs of our executive compensation programs relative to risk. This assessment includes an analysis of our overall compensation philosophy, the program value and plan design, and our governance processes to ensure that we are promoting superior performance in a responsible way relative to risk. In addition, in June 2020, the committee worked with Pearl Meyer in the assessment of the potential for risk stemming from our compensation programs. Following its assessment, including its review of the report of its compensation consultant, the committee concluded that our executive compensation programs are unlikely to create a material adverse effect on Patterson.

Pursuant to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the Section 162(m) performance-based compensation exception was repealed with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, except that certain transition relief is provided for remuneration provided pursuant to a written binding contract which was in effect on November 2, 2017 and which was

not modified in any material respect on or after such date. As a result, compensation paid to any of our covered employees in excess of $1 million per taxable year generally will not be deductible unless, among other requirements, it is intended to qualify, and is eligible to qualify, as Section 162(m) performance-based compensation pursuant to the transition relief provided by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. No assurance can be given that any compensation paid by Patterson will be eligible for such transition relief and, therefore, eligible for the Section 162(m) performance-based compensation exception. The committee will continue to monitor the applicability of Section 162(m) to our ongoing compensation arrangements and intends to continue to compensate our named executive officers in a manner consistent with the best interests of Patterson and its shareholders. The committee also considers the impact of Section 409A of the Code, and in general, our executive plans and programs are designed to comply with the requirements of that section to avoid the possible adverse tax consequences that may arise from non-compliance.