Millendo Therapeutics,
Inc.000154422710-QMar 31, 2020false--12-31YesYesAccelerated
Filertruefalsefalse13,472,9372020Q1truefalseP6MP5Y00015442272020-01-012020-03-31xbrli:shares00015442272020-05-07iso4217:USD00015442272020-03-3100015442272019-12-31iso4217:USDxbrli:shares00015442272019-01-012019-03-310001544227us-gaap:CommonStockMember2019-12-310001544227us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2019-12-310001544227us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2019-12-310001544227us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2019-12-310001544227us-gaap:ParentMember2019-12-310001544227us-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2019-12-310001544227us-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227us-gaap:ParentMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227us-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227us-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-03-310001544227us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2020-03-310001544227us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2020-03-310001544227us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2020-03-310001544227us-gaap:ParentMember2020-03-310001544227us-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2020-03-310001544227us-gaap:CommonStockMember2018-12-310001544227us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2018-12-310001544227us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2018-12-310001544227us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2018-12-310001544227us-gaap:ParentMember2018-12-310001544227us-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2018-12-3100015442272018-12-310001544227us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2019-01-012019-03-310001544227us-gaap:ParentMember2019-01-012019-03-310001544227us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2019-01-012019-03-310001544227us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2019-01-012019-03-310001544227us-gaap:CommonStockMember2019-03-310001544227us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2019-03-310001544227us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2019-03-310001544227us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2019-03-310001544227us-gaap:ParentMember2019-03-310001544227us-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2019-03-3100015442272019-03-310001544227mlnd:UnderwritingAgreementMember2019-12-012019-12-310001544227mlnd:PublicOfferingMember2019-12-310001544227mlnd:PublicOfferingMember2019-12-012019-12-310001544227us-gaap:OverAllotmentOptionMember2019-12-012019-12-310001544227mlnd:AtTheMarketOfferingMember2019-04-012019-04-300001544227mlnd:AtTheMarketOfferingMember2020-03-012020-03-310001544227us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2019-01-012019-03-310001544227mlnd:CommonStockWarrantMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227mlnd:CommonStockWarrantMember2019-01-012019-03-310001544227us-gaap:WarrantMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227us-gaap:WarrantMember2019-01-012019-03-310001544227us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:MoneyMarketFundsMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member2020-03-310001544227us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:MoneyMarketFundsMember2020-03-310001544227us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:MoneyMarketFundsMember2020-03-310001544227us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:MoneyMarketFundsMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member2019-12-310001544227us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:MoneyMarketFundsMember2019-12-310001544227us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:MoneyMarketFundsMember2019-12-31iso4217:EUR0001544227mlnd:BpifranceFinancingMembermlnd:AlizPharmaSasMember2017-12-310001544227mlnd:BpifranceFinancingMembermlnd:AlizPharmaSasMember2017-01-012017-12-310001544227mlnd:BpifranceFinancingMembermlnd:AlizPharmaSasMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227mlnd:BpifranceFinancingMembermlnd:AlizPharmaSasMember2020-03-31xbrli:pure0001544227us-gaap:SubsequentEventMembermlnd:BpifranceFinancingMember2020-04-012020-04-300001544227mlnd:BpifranceFinancingMembermlnd:AlizPharmaSasMember2019-01-012019-03-310001544227srt:MinimumMember2020-03-310001544227srt:MaximumMember2020-03-310001544227mlnd:WalthamMassachusettsMember2019-01-152019-01-150001544227mlnd:WalthamMassachusettsMember2020-01-012020-03-31mlnd:agreement00015442272018-10-012019-02-280001544227mlnd:EquityIncentivePlan2019Member2020-03-310001544227mlnd:EquityIncentivePlan2019Member2020-01-012020-03-310001544227mlnd:EmployeeStockPurchasePlanMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227mlnd:EmployeeStockPurchasePlanMember2020-03-310001544227us-gaap:ResearchAndDevelopmentExpenseMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227us-gaap:ResearchAndDevelopmentExpenseMember2019-01-012019-03-310001544227us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember2019-01-012019-03-3100015442272019-01-012019-12-310001544227us-gaap:WarrantMembermlnd:AlizPharmaSasMembermlnd:BsaWarrantsMember2017-12-190001544227us-gaap:WarrantMembermlnd:BspceWarrantsMembermlnd:AlizPharmaSasMember2017-12-190001544227mlnd:BspceWarrantsMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227mlnd:BsaAndBspceWarrantsMember2020-01-012020-03-310001544227us-gaap:WarrantMembermlnd:AlizPharmaSasMember2020-03-310001544227srt:ScenarioForecastMembermlnd:PraderWilliSyndromeClinicalDevelopmentProgramDiscontinuationMemberus-gaap:EmployeeSeveranceMember2020-04-012020-04-300001544227srt:ScenarioForecastMembermlnd:PraderWilliSyndromeClinicalDevelopmentProgramDiscontinuationMemberus-gaap:EmployeeSeveranceMember2020-04-012020-06-30
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________________________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
_____________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2020
OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
¨ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from __________ to
__________
Commission File No. 001-35890
_____________________________________________________________________
Millendo Therapeutics, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
_____________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
45-1472564 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
110 Miller Avenue, Suite 100
Ann Arbor, Michigan |
|
48104 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (734)
845-9000
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if
Changed Since Last Report)
_____________________________________________________________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of each class |
Trading Symbol(s) |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, $0.001 par value |
MLND |
The Nasdaq Capital Market, LLC |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a
smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” accelerated filer,”
“smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
|
¨ |
Accelerated filer |
x |
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer |
¨ |
Smaller reporting company |
x |
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company |
¨ |
|
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Exchange Act.
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value
per share, outstanding as of May 5, 2020 was
18,999,701.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Unless the context suggests otherwise, references in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q to “Millendo,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,”
and “our” refer to Millendo Therapeutics, Inc. and, where
appropriate, its subsidiaries.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements
reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs and include, but are not
limited to, statements about our plans to develop and commercialize
our product candidates; the progress and timing of our ongoing and
planned clinical trials for our product candidates, including the
timing of an interim data readout from our Phase 2b clinical study
of nevanimibe in congenital adrenal hyperplasia (“CAH”), the
potential and timing for a neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist
(MLE-301) as a potential treatment of vasomotor symptoms to enter
clinical trials; the impact of our discontinuation of the
development of livoletide as a potential treatment of patients with
Prader-Willi syndrome (“PWS”); the timing of and our ability to
obtain and maintain regulatory approvals for our product
candidates; the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business,
preclinical studies and clinical development programs and
timelines, our financial condition and results of operations; and
our estimates regarding future revenue, if any, future expenses,
the funding of our operations, including whether our existing cash,
cash equivalents and restricted cash will be sufficient to fund our
current operating plans into 2022, as well as our future capital
requirements and needs for additional financing. These statements
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to
be materially different from any future results, performances or
achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by terms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,”
“estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,”
“predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “would,” and similar expressions
intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements reflect our current views with respect to future events
and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and
uncertainties. Because of these risks and uncertainties, the
forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report
may not transpire. These risks and uncertainties include, but are
not limited to, the risks included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q under Part II, Item 1A, “Risk
Factors.”
Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements
represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this
document. You should read this document with the understanding that
our actual future results may be materially different from what we
expect. Except as required by law, we do not undertake any
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements
contained in this report, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise.
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 – Financial Statements
MILLENDO THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2020 |
|
December 31,
2019 |
Assets
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ |
58,007 |
|
|
$ |
62,478 |
|
Short-term restricted cash |
870 |
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
4,211 |
|
|
6,344 |
|
Refundable tax credit |
1,536 |
|
|
1,276 |
|
Total current assets
|
64,624 |
|
|
71,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease right-of-use assets |
2,866 |
|
|
3,331 |
|
Other assets |
555 |
|
|
507 |
|
Total assets |
$ |
68,045 |
|
|
$ |
74,970 |
|
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
Current portion of debt |
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
Accounts payable |
2,773 |
|
|
1,495 |
|
Accrued expenses |
6,738 |
|
|
9,066 |
|
Operating lease liabilities — current |
1,442 |
|
|
1,751 |
|
Total current liabilities |
11,211 |
|
|
12,520 |
|
Debt, net of current portion |
110 |
|
|
168 |
|
Operating lease liabilities |
2,078 |
|
|
2,395 |
|
Other liabilities |
7 |
|
|
16 |
|
Total liabilities |
13,406 |
|
|
15,099 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) |
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized; no
shares issued and outstanding
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 100,000,000 shares authorized;
18,998,252 and 18,266,545 shares issued and outstanding at March
31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively
|
19 |
|
|
18 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
274,340 |
|
|
267,018 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
(220,652) |
|
|
(208,654) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
123 |
|
|
165 |
|
Total stockholders’ equity attributable to Millendo
Therapeutics, Inc. |
53,830 |
|
|
58,547 |
|
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests |
809 |
|
|
1,324 |
|
Total stockholders’ equity |
54,639 |
|
|
59,871 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ |
68,045 |
|
|
$ |
74,970 |
|
See accompanying Notes to unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements
MILLENDO THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Loss
(Unaudited)
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 |
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
$ |
7,540 |
|
|
$ |
6,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
4,595 |
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
12,135 |
|
|
10,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (income), net |
$ |
(162) |
|
|
$ |
(315) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other loss |
25 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
$ |
(11,998) |
|
|
$ |
(10,366) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share of common stock, basic and diluted |
$ |
(0.65) |
|
|
$ |
(0.78) |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding, basic and
diluted |
18,448,507 |
|
|
13,357,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
$ |
(42) |
|
|
$ |
(9) |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
$ |
(12,040) |
|
|
$ |
(10,375) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements
MILLENDO THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(Deficit)
(Unaudited)
(in thousands except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital |
|
Accumulated
Deficit |
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income |
|
Total
Stockholders’
Equity (Deficit)
attributable to Millendo
Therapeutics, Inc. |
|
Total Equity
Attributable to
Noncontrolling
Interests |
|
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
(Deficit) |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2020 |
18,266,545 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
267,018 |
|
|
$ |
(208,654) |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
58,547 |
|
|
$ |
1,324 |
|
|
$ |
59,871 |
|
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
719,400 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
5,649 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
5,650 |
|
|
— |
|
|
5,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise/forfeiture of BSPCE warrants |
12,307 |
|
|
— |
|
|
593 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
593 |
|
|
(515) |
|
|
78 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,080 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(42) |
|
|
(42) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(42) |
|
Net income (loss) |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(11,998) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(11,998) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(11,998) |
|
Balance at March 31, 2020 |
18,998,252 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
274,340 |
|
|
$ |
(220,652) |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
53,830 |
|
|
$ |
809 |
|
|
$ |
54,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital |
|
Accumulated
Deficit |
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income |
|
Total
Stockholders’
Equity (Deficit)
attributable to Millendo
Therapeutics, Inc. |
|
Total Equity
Attributable to
Noncontrolling
Interests |
|
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
(Deficit) |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Balance at Balance at January 1, 2019 |
13,357,999 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
234,876 |
|
|
$ |
(164,086) |
|
|
$ |
148 |
|
|
$ |
70,951 |
|
|
$ |
2,171 |
|
|
$ |
73,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
939 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
939 |
|
|
— |
|
|
939 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(9) |
|
|
(9) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(9) |
|
Net income (loss) |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(10,366) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(10,366) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(10,366) |
|
Balance at March 31, 2019 |
13,357,999 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
235,815 |
|
|
$ |
(174,452) |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
61,515 |
|
|
$ |
2,171 |
|
|
$ |
63,686 |
|
See accompanying Notes to unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements
MILLENDO THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
2019 |
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
$ |
(11,998) |
|
|
$ |
(10,366) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities: |
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
37 |
|
|
8 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
1,080 |
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of right-of-use asset |
243 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
1,807 |
|
|
(162) |
|
Other assets |
(1) |
|
|
(59) |
|
Accounts payable |
1,329 |
|
|
398 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
(2,255) |
|
|
(1,291) |
|
Operating lease liabilities |
(403) |
|
|
(144) |
|
Cash used in operating activities |
(10,161) |
|
|
(10,601) |
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
(26) |
|
|
(10) |
|
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities |
— |
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(26) |
|
|
2,976 |
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
Repayment of debt |
— |
|
|
(45) |
|
Payment of financing costs |
(197) |
|
|
(15) |
|
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of issuance
costs |
5,718 |
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from option and warrant exercises |
78 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of principal on finance lease |
(10) |
|
|
— |
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
5,589 |
|
|
(60) |
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on
cash |
(37) |
|
|
(14) |
|
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted
cash |
(4,635) |
|
|
(7,699) |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of
period |
63,512 |
|
|
73,770 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of
period |
$ |
58,877 |
|
|
$ |
66,071 |
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing costs in accounts payable and accrued
expenses |
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
See accompanying Notes to unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements
MILLENDO THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements
1. Organization and Description of Business
Description of Business
Millendo Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware
corporation, together with its subsidiaries, is a clinical stage
biopharmaceutical company primarily focused on developing novel
treatments for endocrine diseases where current therapies do not
exist or are insufficient. The Company seeks to leverage its
understanding of recent biological discoveries in endocrinology to
continue to advance and build its pipeline in order to improve the
lives of patients.
The Company is currently developing nevanimibe (ATR-101) as a
potential treatment for patients with classic congenital adrenal
hyperplasia, (“CAH”), a rare, monogenic adrenal disease that
requires lifelong treatment with exogenous cortisol, often at high
doses. The Company also has a neurokinin 3-receptor (NK3R)
antagonist (MLE-301) in its research and development pipeline,
which it plans to develop as a potential treatment of vasomotor
symptoms (“VMS”), commonly known as hot flashes and night sweats,
in menopausal women. The Company is actively pursuing additional
pipeline assets in treatment areas where it has knowledge and
experience in developing drug product candidates. The Company seeks
to identify assets that complement its current
portfolio.
The Company had been developing livoletide (AZP-531) as a potential
treatment for Prader-Willi syndrome (“PWS”), a rare and complex
genetic endocrine disease characterized by hyperphagia, or
insatiable hunger. The Company elected to discontinue the
development of livoletide as a potential treatment for PWS in April
2020 based upon results from its Phase 2b trial.
The Company’s operations to date have focused on conducting
preclinical studies and clinical trials, acquiring technology and
assets, organization and staffing, business planning, and raising
capital. The Company does not have any products approved for sale
and has not generated any revenue from product sales. The Company’s
product candidates are subject to long development cycles and the
Company may be unsuccessful in its efforts to develop, obtain
regulatory approval for or market its product
candidates.
The Company is subject to a number of risks including, but not
limited to, the need to obtain adequate additional funding for the
ongoing and planned clinical development of its product candidates.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with
pharmaceutical products and development, the Company is unable to
accurately predict the timing or amount of funds required to
complete development of its product candidates, and costs could
exceed the Company’s expectations for a number of reasons,
including reasons beyond the Company’s control.
Liquidity
The Company has incurred net losses since inception and it expects
to generate losses from operations for the foreseeable future
primarily due to research and development costs for its potential
product candidates. As of March 31, 2020, the Company had
cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of $58.9 million and an
accumulated deficit of $220.7 million.
In December 2019, the Company sold a total of 4,791,667 shares of
its common stock pursuant to an underwriting agreement (the
“Underwriting Agreement”) with Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and
SVB Leerink LLC, as representatives of the several underwriters
named herein (the “Underwriters”), for total net proceeds of
approximately $26.5 million, after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and other offering expenses payable by
the Company. The price to the public in this offering was $6.00 per
share and resulted in the sale of 4,166,667 shares of the Company's
common stock for net proceeds of approximately $23.0 million,
after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other
offering expenses payable by the Company. In addition, the
Underwriters purchased an additional 625,000 shares of the
Company's common stock at the public offering price of $6.00 per
share pursuant to a purchase option granted to them under the
Underwriting Agreement, resulting in net proceeds of approximately
$3.5 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions.
In April 2019, the Company entered into an “at-the-market” (“ATM”)
equity distribution agreement with Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
acting as sole agent with an aggregate offering value of up to
$50.0 million, which allows the Company to sell its common stock
through the facilities of the Nasdaq Capital Market. Subject to the
terms of the ATM equity distribution agreement, the Company is able
to determine, at its sole discretion, the timing and number of
shares to be sold under this ATM facility. In March 2020, the
Company amended and restated the equity distribution agreement to
include SVB Leerink LLC as an additional sales agent for the ATM.
In March 2020, the Company sold 719,400 shares of its common stock
under its ATM equity distribution agreement for net proceeds of
approximately $5.7 million.
The Company will require additional capital in the future through
equity or debt financings, partnerships, collaborations, or other
sources to carry out the Company’s planned development activities
and to obtain regulatory approval for or to commercialize its
product candidates. If additional capital is not secured when
required, the Company may need to delay or curtail its operations
until such funding is received. Various internal and external
factors will affect whether and when the Company’s product
candidates become approved drugs. The regulatory approval and
market acceptance of the Company’s proposed future products (if
any), length of time and cost of developing and commercializing
these product candidates and/or failure of them at any stage of the
drug approval process will materially affect the Company’s
financial condition and future operations. The Company believes its
cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at March 31, 2020
are sufficient to fund its current operations for at least 12
months following the issuance of these financial
statements.
2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Basis of presentation and consolidation principles
The accompanying unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements include the accounts of Millendo Therapeutics, Inc.
and its subsidiaries, and all intercompany amounts have been
eliminated. The unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (“GAAP”). Any reference in these notes to
applicable guidance is meant to refer to GAAP as found in the
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and Accounting Standards
Updates (“ASU”) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”). The unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
include the accounts of the Company’s subsidiaries in which the
Company holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial
statement date.
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company has prepared the accompanying unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements based on Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) rules that permit reduced disclosure for interim
periods. These unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
include, in the Company’s opinion, all adjustments, consisting only
of normal recurring adjustments that the Company considers
necessary for a fair presentation of its consolidated financial
position and results of operations for these periods. The Company’s
historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to
be expected in the future and the Company’s operating results for
the three months ended March 31, 2020 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2020.
The accompanying unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated
Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2019 as filed with the SEC on March 11, 2020.
Since the date of such financial statements, there have been no
changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies except as
noted below:
Use of estimates
The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in
conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of
expenses during the reporting period. Due to the uncertainty of
factors surrounding the estimates or judgments used in the
preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements, actual
results may materially vary from these estimates. Estimates and
assumptions are periodically reviewed and the effects of revisions
are reflected in the financial statements in the period they are
determined to be necessary.
The Company anticipates that the COVID-19 pandemic will have an
impact on clinical and preclinical development
activities.
Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects
cannot be determined with certainty and therefore require the
exercise of judgment. As of the date of issuance of these financial
statements, the Company is not aware of any specific event or
circumstance that would require the Company to update its
estimates, assumptions and judgments or revise the carrying value
of its assets or liabilities. These estimates may change as new
events occur and additional information is obtained and are
recognized in the consolidated financial statements as soon as they
become known. Actual results could differ from those estimates and
any such differences may be material to the Company’s financial
statements.
Significant Risks and Uncertainties
With the global spread of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in the
first quarter of 2020, the Company has implemented business
continuity plans designed to address and mitigate the impact of the
COVID-19 pandemic on its business. The Company anticipates that the
COVID-19 pandemic will have an impact on clinical and preclinical
development activities.
The
extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts the Company’s
business, its preclinical and clinical development and regulatory
efforts, its corporate development objectives and the value of and
market for its common stock, will depend on future developments
that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence
at this time, such as the ultimate duration of the pandemic, travel
restrictions, quarantines, social distancing and business closure
requirements in the U.S., Europe and other countries, and the
effectiveness of actions taken globally to contain and treat the
disease. The global economic slowdown, the overall disruption of
global healthcare systems and the other risks and uncertainties
associated with the pandemic could have a material adverse effect
on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of
operations and growth prospects.
In addition, the Company is subject to other challenges and risks
specific to its business and its ability to execute on its
strategy, as well as risks and uncertainties common to companies in
the pharmaceutical industry with development operations, including,
without limitation, risks and uncertainties associated with:
obtaining regulatory approval of its product candidates, loss of
single source suppliers or failure to comply with manufacturing
regulations, identifying, acquiring or in-licensing additional
products or product candidates; pharmaceutical product development
and the inherent uncertainty of clinical success; and the
challenges of protecting and enhancing its intellectual property
rights; complying with applicable regulatory requirements. In
addition, to the extent the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic adversely
affects its business and results of operations, the Company may
also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks and
uncertainties discussed above.
Net loss per share
Basic loss per share of common stock is computed by dividing net
loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period.
Diluted loss per share of common stock includes the effect, if any,
from the potential exercise or conversion of securities, such as
restricted stock and stock options, which would result in the
issuance of incremental shares of common stock. In computing the
basic and diluted net loss per share, the weighted-average number
of shares of common stock remains the same for both calculations
due to the fact that when a net loss exists, dilutive shares are
not included in the calculation as the impact is
anti-dilutive.
The following potentially dilutive securities have been excluded
from the computation of diluted weighted-average shares of common
stock outstanding, as they would be anti-dilutive (amounts shown as
common stock equivalents):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
2019 |
Stock options
|
3,340,732 |
|
|
2,381,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock warrants |
17,125 |
|
|
17,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
BSA and BSPCE warrants |
58,415 |
|
|
156,719 |
|
|
3,416,272 |
|
|
2,555,132 |
|
Recent accounting pronouncements
In January 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-01,
Investments-Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments-Equity
Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging
(Topic 815).
ASU 2020-01 states any equity security transitioning from the
alternative method of accounting under Topic 321 to the equity
method, or vice versa, due to an observable transaction will be
remeasured immediately before the transition. In addition, the ASU
clarifies the accounting for certain non-derivative forward
contracts or purchased call options to acquire equity securities
stating such instruments will be measured using the fair value
principles of Topic 321 before settlement or exercise. The ASU is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and
will be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is
permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact
of this new guidance on its consolidated financial statements and
related disclosures.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12,
Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Simplifying the Accounting for Income
Taxes.
ASU 2019-12 simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing
exceptions within the general principles of Topic 740 regarding the
calculation of deferred tax liabilities, the incremental approach
for intraperiod tax allocation, and calculating income taxes in an
interim period. In addition, the ASU adds clarifications to the
accounting for franchise tax (or similar tax), which is partially
based on income, evaluating tax basis of goodwill recognized from a
business combination, and reflecting the effect of any enacted
changes in tax laws or rates in the annual effective tax rate
computation in the interim period that includes the enactment date.
The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2020, and will be applied either retrospectively or prospectively
based upon the applicable amendments. Early adoption is permitted.
The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this new
guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13,
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework -
Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value
Measurement.
ASU 2018-13 resulted in certain modifications to fair
value
measurement disclosures, primarily related to level 3 fair value
measurements. This standard was effective for fiscal years,
and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after
December 15, 2019, and early adoption was permitted. The
adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the
consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13,
Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) Measurement
of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,
which replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current
GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and
requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and
supportable information to inform credit loss estimates.
Additionally, ASU 2016-13 requires a financial asset measured at
amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to
be collected through the use of an allowance of expected credit
losses. In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-05,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) Targeted
Transition Relief,
which amends ASU 2016-13 by providing entities with an option to
irrevocably elect the fair value option to be applied on an
instrument-by-instrument basis for eligible financial instruments
that are within the scope of Topic 326. The fair value option
election does not apply to held-to-maturity debt securities. In
November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-10,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic
326),
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic
842),
which finalized effective date delays for private companies,
not-for-profit organizations, and certain smaller reporting
companies applying the credit losses, leases, and hedging
standards. Also, in November 2019, the FASB issued ASU
2019-11,
Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments -
Credit Losses,
which provides clarity about certain aspects of the amendments in
ASU 2016-13. ASU 2016-13, as amended, is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including
interim periods within those fiscal years, and requires a
modified retrospective approach. The Company is in the process of
evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its consolidated
financial statements and related disclosures.
3. Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present the Company’s fair value hierarchy for
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds (included in cash and cash
equivalents) |
$ |
51,585 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds (included in cash and cash
equivalents) |
$ |
59,382 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following (amounts in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2020 |
|
December 31,
2019 |
Compensation and related benefits |
$ |
760 |
|
|
$ |
2,042 |
|
Professional fees |
2,266 |
|
|
2,929 |
|
Preclinical and clinical costs |
2,129 |
|
|
1,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premiums |
831 |
|
|
1,423 |
|
Other |
752 |
|
|
852 |
|
Total |
$ |
6,738 |
|
|
$ |
9,066 |
|
5. Debt
Bpifrance Reimbursable Advance
In December, 2017, in connection with its acquisition of Alizé
Pharma SAS (“Alizé”), the Company assumed €0.7 million of debt that
Alizé had outstanding with Bpifrance Financing (“Bpifrance”). The
original advance amount of €0.8 million (“the Bpifrance Advance”)
was provided to Alizé as an innovation aid that required Alizé to
carry out certain activities related to its livoletide clinical
development program and incur a certain level of program
expenditures. No interest is charged or accrued under the
advance.
The Company is required to make quarterly principal payments, which
began in December 2016 and continue through September 2021.
The quarterly principal payments escalate over the repayment period
beginning with €17,500 per quarter and increasing to €50,000
through maturity. In addition to the quarterly payments, beginning
January 1, 2016, Bpifrance may require the Company to pay, by no
later than March 31 of each year, a reimbursement annuity
equal to 20% of the proceeds generated by the Company from license,
assignment or use of livoletide. Under no circumstance, however,
would the Company be required to reimburse to Bpifrance principal
amounts greater than the original advance it received.
The Company is permitted to repay the Bpifrance Advance at any
time, at which point it would be released from all commitments and
obligations under the Bpifrance Advance agreement. The Bpifrance
Advance agreement does not contain any ongoing financial
covenants.
During the three months ended March 31, 2020 the Company made
no principal payments due to the fact that in April 2020, Bpifrance
provided a
six month deferral of principal payments to support
businesses as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. During the three
months ended March 31, 2019, the Company made principal
payments of $45,000. At March 31, 2020, the balance
outstanding was $0.4 million (or €0.3 million).
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases
The Company has noncancellable operating leases for office and
laboratory space which have remaining lease terms between
approximately six months and four years. In connection with
privately-held Millendo Therapeutics, Inc.'s merger with
OvaScience, Inc. in December 2018 (the “Merger”), the Company
assumed a sublease agreement for office and laboratory space
located in Waltham, Massachusetts. The sublease commenced on
January 15, 2019 and expires in November 2020. The total minimum
sublease rentals to be received under the Waltham, Massachusetts
agreement is $0.6 million. The remaining sublease rentals to be
received as of March 31, 2020 is $0.2 million. In February 2019 and
October 2018, the Company entered into two additional
noncancellable operating leases for office space in Ann Arbor,
Michigan for the Company’s headquarters; one that the Company took
possession of in April 2019, and the other that the Company took
possession of in July 2019, respectively. One of its leases in Ann
Arbor, Michigan expires in June 2024 and the other expires in March
2024. In April 2019, the Company entered into a lease agreement for
office space in Lexington, Massachusetts and that lease expires on
September 30, 2020. Lease agreements generally do not require
material variable lease payments, residual value guarantees or
restrictive covenants. In January 2020, the Company terminated its
office lease agreement in Lyon, France.
As of March 31, 2020, the operating lease ROU asset and the
operating lease liabilities were $2.9 million and $3.5 million,
respectively. The weighted average discount rate used to account
for the Company's operating leases under ASC 842 is the Company’s
estimated incremental borrowing rate of 7.0%. The Company has
options to extend certain of its leases for another
five to ten years. These options to extend were not
recognized as part of the Company’s measurement of the ROU assets
and operating lease liabilities for the three months ended
March 31, 2020. The weighted average remaining term of the
Company’s noncancellable operating leases is 3.48
years.
Rent expense related to the Company's operating leases was
approximately $231,000 and $67,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company recognizes
rent expense on a straight-lined basis over the lease period and
has accrued for rent expense incurred but not yet paid. Cash paid
for amounts included in the measurement of the lease liabilities
was approximately $0.5 million and $0.2 million and the Company
received approximately $87,000 and $71,000 in sublease payments
related to its Waltham, Massachusetts lease during the three months
ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Future minimum rental payments under the Company’s noncancellable
operating leases at March 31, 2020 is as follows (amounts in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 (excluding the three months ended March 31, 2020) |
$ |
1,293 |
|
2021 |
760 |
|
2022 |
783 |
|
2023 |
806 |
|
2024 |
302 |
|
Thereafter
|
— |
|
Total |
$ |
3,944 |
|
Present Value Adjustment |
(424) |
|
Lease liability at March 31, 2020 |
$ |
3,520 |
|
Litigation
Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims,
assessments, litigation, fines, penalties, and other sources are
recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and
the amount can be reasonably estimated.
On November 9, 2016, a purported shareholder derivative action was
filed in the Business Litigation Session of the Suffolk County
Superior Court in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
(Cima
v. Dipp,
No. 16-3443-BLS1 (Mass. Sup. Ct.)) against certain former officers
and directors of OvaScience and one current director of the Company
(a former director of OvaScience) and OvaScience as a nominal
defendant alleging breaches of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment,
abuse of control, gross mismanagement and corporate waste for
purported actions related to OvaScience’s January 2015 follow-on
public offering. On February 22, 2017, the court approved the
parties’ joint stipulation to stay all proceedings in the action
until further notice. Following a status conference in December
2017, the stay was lifted. On January 25, 2018, at the parties’
request, the court entered a second order staying all proceedings
in the action until further order of the court. On March 2, 2020,
the parties submitted a status report requesting that the Court
continue the stay. On March 5, 2020, the court entered an order
continuing the stay and requiring that the parties file a further
status report on or before June 30, 2020. The Company believes that
the complaint is without merit and intends to defend against the
litigation. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company
will be successful. At present, the Company is unable to estimate
potential losses, if any, related to the lawsuit.
On March 24, 2017, a purported shareholder class action lawsuit was
filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
(Dahhan
v. OvaScience, Inc.,
No. 1:17-cv-10511-IT (D. Mass.)) against OvaScience and certain
former officers and directors of OvaScience alleging violations of
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act (the "Dahhan Action").
On July 5, 2017, the court entered an order approving the
appointment of Freedman Family Investments LLC as lead plaintiff,
the firm of Robins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP as lead counsel and
the Law Office of Alan L. Kovacs as local counsel. Plaintiff filed
an amended complaint on August 25, 2017. The Company filed a motion
to dismiss the amended complaint, which the court denied on July
31, 2018. On August 14, 2018, the Company answered the amended
complaint. On December 9, 2019, the Court granted leave for
plaintiff to file a second amended complaint under seal and
permitted defendants to file a motion to strike the second amended
complaint. On December 30, 2019, the Court granted the parties’
joint motion to stay all proceedings in the case pending mediation.
On March 3, 2020, the parties conducted a mediation session. As the
mediation was unsuccessful, the parties are resuming discovery, and
the Company filed a motion to strike the second amended complaint
on May 1, 2020. The Company believes that the amended complaint and
the second amended complaint are without merit and intends to
defend against the litigation. There can be no assurance, however,
that the Company will be successful. A resolution of this lawsuit
adverse to the Company or the other defendants could have a
material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position
and results of operations. At present, the Company is unable to
estimate potential losses, if any, related to the
lawsuit.
On July 27, 2017, a purported shareholder derivative complaint was
filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
(Chiu
v. Dipp,
No. 1:17-cv-11382-IT (D. Mass.)) against OvaScience, as a nominal
defendant, certain former officers and directors of OvaScience and
one current director of the Company (a former director of
OvaScience) alleging breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment
and violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act alleging that
compensation awarded to the director defendants was excessive and
seeking redress for purported actions related to OvaScience’s
January 2015 follow-on public offering and other public statements.
On September 26, 2017, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint
which eliminated all claims regarding allegedly excessive director
pay and additionally alleged claims of abuse of control and
corporate waste.
On October 27, 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the
amended complaint. The court heard oral argument on the motion to
dismiss on April 5, 2018. On April 13, 2018, the court granted the
defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to
state a claim for relief under Section 14(a). The court also
dismissed the plaintiffs’ pendent state law claims without
prejudice, based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On April
25, 2018, the plaintiffs moved for leave to amend the complaint and
to stay this case pending the outcome of the Dahhan Action. The
Company does not believe that the proposed amended complaint cures
the defects in the current complaint, but informed plaintiffs’
counsel that, in the interest of judicial economy, defendants would
not oppose the proposed amendment if the court would consider
staying the case pending the resolution of the Dahhan Action. On
April 27, 2018, the court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for leave
to amend the complaint and for a stay. On April 30, 2018, the
plaintiffs filed their second amended complaint. On May 23, 2018,
the court entered an order staying this case pending the resolution
of the Dahhan Action. The Company believes that the complaint is
without merit and intends to defend against the litigation. There
can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful.
At present, the Company is unable to estimate potential losses, if
any, related to the lawsuit.
In addition to the matters described above, the Company may be a
party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary
course of business from time to time. Regardless of the outcome,
litigation can have an adverse impact on the Company because of
defense and settlement costs, and diversion of management
resources.
7. Stock-Based Compensation
On June 11, 2019, the Company held its 2019 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). At the Annual Meeting, the
Company’s stockholders approved the Company’s 2019 Equity Incentive
Plan (the “2019 Plan”) and the Company’s 2019 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the “2019 ESPP,” and together with the 2019 Plan,
the “Plans”). The 2019 Plan is the successor to the Private
Millendo 2012 Stock Plan and the OvaScience 2012 Stock Incentive
Plan (each, as amended, the “Prior Plans”) and allows the Company
to grant stock options, restricted stock unit awards and other
awards at levels determined appropriate by the Company’s Board of
Directors (the “Board”) or the Compensation Committee of the Board.
No additional awards will be granted under either of the Prior
Plans. The 2019 ESPP enables employees to purchase shares of the
Company’s common stock through offerings of rights to purchase the
Company’s common stock to all eligible employees. The Plans were
adopted by the Board on April 29, 2019, subject to approval by the
Company’s stockholders, and became effective with such stockholder
approval on June 11, 2019. Outstanding awards under the Prior Plans
continue to be subject to the terms and conditions of the Prior
Plans.
The aggregate number of shares of the Company's common stock
initially reserved for issuance under the 2019 Plan was 2,919,872
shares, which is the sum of (i) 534,320 shares, (ii) the number of
unallocated shares remaining available for grant under the Prior
Plans as of the effective date of the 2019 Plan, and (iii) the
Prior Plans' Returning Shares (as defined below), as such shares
become available from time to time. The number of shares of the
Company's common stock reserved for issuance under the 2019 Plan
will automatically increase on January 1 of each year, for a period
of ten years, from January 1, 2020 continuing through January 1,
2029, by 4% of the total number of shares of the Company's common
stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar
year, or a lesser number of shares as may be determined by the
Board.
The term “Prior Plan's Returning Shares” refers to the following
shares of the Company's common stock subject to any outstanding
stock award granted under either of the Prior Plans: shares of
common stock subject to awards that (i) expire or terminate for any
reason prior to exercise or settlement; (ii) are forfeited because
of the failure to meet a contingency or condition required to vest
such shares or otherwise return to the Company; (iii) are
reacquired, withheld (or not issued) to satisfy a tax withholding
obligation in connection with an award or to satisfy the purchase
price or exercise price of a stock award. The foregoing includes
shares subject to outstanding awards under the OvaScience 2011
Stock Incentive Plan that expire, terminate or are otherwise
surrendered, canceled, forfeited or repurchased by the Company at
their original issuance price pursuant to a contractual repurchase
right.
The following shares of the Company's common stock under the 2019
Plan (collectively, the “2019 Plan Returning Shares”) will also
become available again for issuance under the 2019 Plan: (i) any
shares subject to a stock award that are not issued because such
stock award expires or otherwise terminates without all of the
shares covered by such stock award having been issued, (ii) any
shares subject to a stock award that are not issued because such
stock award is settled in cash; (iii) any shares issued pursuant to
a stock award that are forfeited back to or repurchased by the
Company because of the failure to meet a contingency or condition
required for the vesting of such shares; and (iv) any shares
reacquired by the Company in satisfaction of tax withholding
obligations on a stock award or as consideration for the exercise
or purchase price of a stock award.
The aggregate number of shares of the Company's common stock that
may be issued under the 2019 ESPP is 133,580 shares, plus the
number of shares of the Company's common stock that are
automatically added on January 1st of each year, for a period of up
to ten years, from January 1, 2020 continuing through January 1,
2029, by the lesser of (i) 1% of the total number
of shares of the Company's capital stock outstanding on
December 31 of the preceding calendar year, or (ii) 133,580
shares of the Company's common stock, unless a lesser number of
shares is determined by the Board. Pursuant to the terms of the
2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, an additional 133,580 shares
were added to the number of available shares effective January 1,
2020.
The Company measures employee and nonemployee stock-based awards at
grant date fair value and records compensation expense on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period of the
award.
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense in the
following expense categories of its accompanying consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss for
the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019,
respectively (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 |
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
780 |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$ |
1,080 |
|
|
$ |
939 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
Options issued may have a contractual life of up to 10 years and
may be exercisable in cash or as otherwise determined by the Board.
Vesting generally occurs over a period of not greater than four
years.
The following table summarizes the activity related to stock option
grants to employees and nonemployees for the three months ended
March 31, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise price
per share |
|
Weighted-average
remaining
contractual
life (years) |
Outstanding at December 31, 2019 |
2,498,606 |
|
|
$ |
17.18 |
|
|
7.7 |
Granted |
857,875 |
|
|
7.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
(15,749) |
|
|
14.65 |
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2020 |
3,340,732 |
|
|
$ |
14.76 |
|
|
8.0 |
Vested and exercisable at March 31, 2020 |
1,230,674 |
|
|
$ |
23.08 |
|
|
5.8 |
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2020 |
3,340,732 |
|
|
$ |
14.76 |
|
|
8.0 |
As of March 31, 2020, the unrecognized compensation cost
related to 2,110,058 unvested stock options expected to vest was
$12.5 million. This unrecognized compensation will be recognized
over an estimated weighted-average amortization period of 3.0
years. There were no options exercised during the three months
ended March 31, 2020. The aggregate intrinsic value of options
outstanding and options exercisable as of March 31, 2020 was
$0.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively. The options granted
during the three months ended March 31, 2020 had an estimated
weighted-average grant date fair value of $5.21. There were 705,133
options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2019
at an estimated weighted-average fair value of $6.45. The grant
date fair value of each option grant was estimated during the three
months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 using the following
assumptions within the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2020 |
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Expected term (in years) |
6.08 |
|
6.05 |
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
78 |
% |
|
80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
1.36 |
% |
|
2.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield |
0 |
% |
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
At the time of the Alizé acquisition, Alizé had 6,219 nonemployee
(BSA) warrants and 5,360 employee (BSPCE) warrants outstanding,
which have weighted-average exercise prices of €80.06 and €83.40,
respectively. As of March 31, 2020, all BSA and BSPCE warrants
were vested. During the three months ended March 31, 2020, 910
BSPCE warrants were exercised
resulting in the issuance of 12,307 shares of the Company’s common
stock. In addition, during the three months ended March 31,
2020, a total of 1,836 BSA and BSPCE warrants were forfeited. As of
March 31, 2020, there were an aggregate of 58,415 shares of
common stock issuable upon the exercise of the BSA and BSPCE
warrants with a weighted-average exercise price of $7.02 per share.
These instruments are included in the equity attributable to
noncontrolling interests.
8. Subsequent Events
As discussed in Note 1, in April 2020, the Company elected to
discontinue the development of livoletide as a potential treatment
for PWS based upon results from its Phase 2b trial. The Company is
in the process of estimating the amounts expected to be incurred in
connection with the discontinuation of the PWS
program.
In connection with the discontinuation of the livoletide program in
PWS, the Company is currently evaluating its business strategy to
prioritize and allocate resources towards the advancement of its
current product candidates and potential future pipeline assets. In
an effort to streamline costs, the Company is also in the process
of
eliminating employee positions representing approximately 30% of
its prior headcount,
with the majority of the reduction in personnel completed in April
2020. The Company estimates that it will incur one-time costs of
approximately $1.0 million in the form of termination benefits
related to this plan in the second quarter of 2020.
Subsequent events were evaluated through the filing date of this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion of our financial condition
and results of operations in conjunction with our unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and with our
annual audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) on March 11, 2020. In addition to historical
financial information, the following discussion contains
forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates,
beliefs and expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Our
actual results and the timing of events could differ materially
from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors
that could cause or contribute to these differences include those
discussed below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly in
Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and “Special Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements.”
Overview
We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company primarily focused
on developing novel treatments for endocrine diseases where current
therapies do not exist or are insufficient. We seek to leverage our
understanding of recent biological discoveries in endocrinology to
continue to advance and build our pipeline in order to improve the
lives of patients. We are currently developing nevanimibe (ATR-101)
as a potential treatment for patients with classic congenital
adrenal hyperplasia (“CAH”), and we are also developing a
neurokinin 3-receptor (NK3R) antagonist (MLE-301) as a potential
treatment of vasomotor symptoms (“VMS”) in menopausal women. We are
actively pursuing additional pipeline assets in treatment areas
where we have knowledge and experience in developing drug product
candidates. We seek to identify assets that complement our current
portfolio.
CAH is a rare, monogenic adrenal disease that requires lifelong
treatment with exogenous cortisol, often at high doses. These
chronic high doses of cortisol can result in side effects that
include diabetes, obesity, hypertension and psychological problems.
When on suboptimal doses of cortisol, female patients with CAH can
experience hirsutism, infertility and menstrual irregularity, and
male patients with CAH can experience testicular atrophy,
infertility and testicular tumors. It is often difficult for
physicians to appropriately treat CAH without causing adverse
consequences. We reported results from our Phase 2a clinical trial
of nevanimibe in patients with CAH in March 2018 and initiated a
Phase 2b trial in the third quarter of 2018. Due to the COVID-19
pandemic, new patients are not being actively enrolled in the
open-label Phase 2b study. We expect to conduct an interim review
of the dataset for enrolled patients by the third quarter of
2020.
VMS is commonly known as hot flashes and night sweats, in
menopausal women. The sensations of heat and/or perspiration
associated with VMS can occur frequently, generally last several
minutes, and are often preceded or followed by sensations of cold
and/or shivering. VMS interfere with the lives of affected women in
a number of ways, including disrupting patients’ ability to sleep
and concentrate and causing anxiety and depression. VMS are
experienced by up to 70% of women as they advance through
menopause. We believe that approximately 20 million women in the
United States experience VMS at any given time and that these
patients are motivated to seek medical treatment for relief.
MLE-301 is currently in preclinical studies designed to enable
first-in-human clinical studies, which we expect to initiate in the
second half of 2020.
We had been developing livoletide (AZP-531) as a potential
treatment for Prader-Willi syndrome (“PWS”), a rare and complex
genetic endocrine disease characterized by hyperphagia, or
insatiable hunger. We elected to discontinue the development of
livoletide as a potential treatment for PWS in April 2020 based
upon results from the Phase 2b trial.
Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses and
negative operating cash flows and there is no assurance that we
will ever achieve or sustain profitability. Our net losses were
$12.0 million and $10.4 million for the three months ended March
31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of March 31, 2020, we had an
accumulated deficit of $220.7 million. We expect to continue to
incur significant expenses and increasing operating losses for the
foreseeable future.
On December 7, 2018, OvaScience, Inc. (“OvaScience”), now
known as Millendo Therapeutics, Inc., completed its reverse
merger (the “Merger”) with what was then known as privately-held
Millendo Therapeutics, Inc., (“Private Millendo”), in
accordance with the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger and
Reorganization dated as of August 8, 2018, as amended on
September 25, 2018 and November 1, 2018. OvaScience’s
shares of common stock listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market,
previously trading through the close of business on Friday,
December 7, 2018 under the ticker symbol “OVAS,” commenced
trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market, under the ticker symbol
“MLND,” on Monday, December 10, 2018.
Recent Developments
Discontinuation of development of livoletide for the treatment of
Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS)
As we previously announced, we elected in April 2020 to discontinue
the development of livoletide as a potential treatment for PWS,
including the 9-month extension study and the initiation of the
Phase 3 ZEPHYR trial. The decision to discontinue the PWS program
was based on results from the Phase 2b ZEPHYR study, which showed
that treatment with livoletide did not result in a statistically
significant improvement in hyperphagia and food-related behaviors
as measured by the Hyperphagia Questionnaire for Clinical Trials
compared to placebo.
In connection with the discontinuation of the livoletide program in
PWS, we are currently evaluating our business strategy to
prioritize and allocate resources towards the advancement of
current product candidates and potential future pipeline assets. In
an effort to streamline costs, we are also in the process of
eliminating employee positions representing approximately 30% of
our prior headcount,
with the majority of the reduction in personnel completed in April
2020.
Nevanimibe for the treatment of classic congenital adrenal
hyperplasia (CAH)
The
Phase 2b
clinical study of nevanimibe for the treatment of CAH is an
open-label, intra-subject dose-escalation trial designed to enroll
a total of 10 or more
patients with CAH
for each of the two distinct cohorts of patients, across
approximately 10 to 12 sites.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, new patients are not being actively
enrolled in the study, and we may experience
a disruption or delay in our ability to assess already-enrolled
patients.
We expect to conduct an interim review of the dataset for enrolled
patients by the third quarter of 2020.
COVID-19 Business Update
With the global spread of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in the
first quarter of 2020, we established a cross-functional task force
and implemented business continuity plans designed to address and
mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our employees and
our business. While we are experiencing limited financial impacts
from the pandemic at this time, given the global economic slowdown,
the overall disruption of global healthcare systems and the other
risks and uncertainties associated with the pandemic, our business,
financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects
could be materially adversely affected. We continue to closely
monitor the COVID-19 situation as we evolve our business continuity
plans and response strategy. In March 2020, our global workforce
transitioned to working remotely. We are currently preparing plans
to allow employees to return to the office, which will be based on
a phased approach that is principles-based, flexible and local in
design, with a focus on patient continuity, employee safety and
optimal work environment.
Supply Chain
We are working closely with our third-party manufacturers,
distributors and other partners to manage our supply chain
activities and mitigate potential disruptions to our product
supplies as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. We currently expect
to have adequate global supply of nevanimibe to support our ongoing
Phase 2b trial and of MLE-301 to support our ongoing preclinical
studies. If the COVID-19 pandemic persists for an extended period
of time and begins to impact essential distribution systems such as
FedEx and postal delivery, we could experience disruptions to our
supply chain and operations, and associated delays in the
manufacturing and supply of our products, which would adversely
impact our ability to conduct clinical and preclinical
trials.
Clinical Development
With respect to clinical development, we have taken measures to
implement remote and virtual approaches, including remote patient
monitoring and home delivery of drug treatments where possible, to
maintain patient safety and trial continuity and to preserve study
integrity. For our ongoing Phase 2b clinical trial of nevanimibe,
we are experiencing, and expect to continue to experience, a
disruption or delay in our ability to enroll and assess patients.
As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we anticipate an impact on our
ability to
initiate trial sites and maintain patient
enrollment.
We could also see an impact on our ability to acquire supplies of
study drug, report trial results or interact with regulators,
ethics committees or other important agencies due to limitations in
regulatory authority employee resources or otherwise. In addition,
we rely on contract research organizations or other third parties
to assist us with clinical trials, and we cannot guarantee that
they will continue to perform their contractual duties in a timely
and satisfactory manner as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. If
the COVID-19 pandemic continues and persists for an extended period
of time, we could experience significant disruptions to our
clinical development timelines, which would adversely affect our
business, financial condition, results of operations and growth
prospects.
Regulatory Activities
We have not experienced, to date, any delays with respect to
regulatory reviews or interactions with regulatory authorities as a
result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Neither the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (the "FDA"), or other regulatory authorities such as
the European Medicines Agency (the "EMA"), has notified us of any
COVID-19-related delays in reviews impacting our clinical or
preclinical programs. However, it is possible that we could
experience delays in the timing of regulatory reviews or
interactions with the FDA, EMA, or other regulatory authorities due
to, for example, absenteeism by governmental employees or the
diversion of regulators' efforts and attention to approval of other
therapeutics or other activities related to COVID-19.
Corporate Development
With our strong cash balance, including net proceeds of
approximately $5.7 million in March 2020 from the sale of
719,400 shares of our common stock under our “at-the-market” equity
distribution agreement with Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and SVB
Leerink LLC, we anticipate having sufficient liquidity to make
strategic investments in our business this year in support of our
long-term growth strategy. We believe that our cash, cash
equivalents and restricted cash as of March 31, 2020 will fund our
planned operations into 2022. However, our operating plan may
change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us, and we
may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned, through
public or private equity or debt financings, third-party funding,
marketing and distribution arrangements, as well as other
collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements, or
any combination of these approaches. In addition, the COVID-19
pandemic continues to rapidly evolve and has already resulted in a
significant disruption of global financial markets. If the
disruption persists and deepens, we could experience an inability
to access additional capital, which could in the future negatively
affect our operations.
Other Financial and Corporate Impacts
While we expect the COVID-19 pandemic to adversely affect our
business operations and financial results, our clinical development
and regulatory efforts, our corporate development objectives and
the value of and market for our common stock, will depend on future
developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with
confidence at this time, such as the ultimate duration of the
pandemic, travel restrictions, quarantines, social distancing and
business closure requirements in the U.S., Europe and other
countries, and the effectiveness of actions taken globally to
contain and treat the disease. For example, if remote work policies
for certain portions of our business, or that of our business
partners, are extended longer than we currently expect, we may need
to reassess our priorities and our corporate objectives for the
year.
We have not experienced any material impact to our internal
controls over financial reporting despite the fact that our
employees are working remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We are
continually monitoring and assessing the COVID-19 situation on our
internal controls to minimize the impact on their design and
operating effectiveness. In addition, all information technology
operations are inherently vulnerable to inadvertent or intentional
security breaches, incidents, attacks and exposures, the
accessibility and distributed nature of our information technology
systems, and the sensitive information stored on those systems,
make such systems potentially vulnerable to unintentional or
malicious, internal and external attacks on our technology
environment. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have enabled
substantially all of our employees to work remotely, which may make
us more vulnerable to cyberattacks or other incidents. To date, we
have not experienced any increase to cyberattacks or other
incidents.
Components of Our Results of Operations
Research and development expense
Research and development expense consists primarily of costs
incurred in connection with the development of our product
candidates. We expense research and development costs as incurred.
These expenses include:
•personnel
expenses, including salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation
expense;
•costs
of funding research performed by third-parties, including pursuant
to agreements with contract research organizations, (“CROs”), as
well as investigative sites and consultants that conduct our
preclinical studies and clinical trials;
•expenses
incurred under agreements with contract manufacturing organizations
(“CMOs”), including manufacturing scale-up expenses and the cost of
acquiring and manufacturing preclinical study and clinical trial
materials;
•payments
made under our third-party licensing agreements;
•consultant
fees and expenses associated with outsourced professional
scientific development services;
•expenses
for regulatory activities, including filing fees paid to regulatory
agencies; and
•allocated
expenses for facility costs, including rent, utilities,
depreciation and maintenance.
Milestone payment obligations incurred prior to regulatory approval
of a product candidate, which are accrued when the event requiring
payment of the milestone occurs are included in research and
development expense.
We typically use our employee, consultant and infrastructure
resources across our development programs. We track certain
outsourced development costs by product candidate, but do not
allocate all personnel costs or other internal costs to specific
product candidates.
The following table summarizes our research and development
expenses by product candidate, personnel expense and other expenses
for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019,
respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 |
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Livoletide expenses |
$ |
4,846 |
|
|
$ |
3,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nevanimibe expenses |
252 |
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
|
MLE-301 expenses |
430 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel expenses |
1,774 |
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses |
238 |
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$ |
7,540 |
|
|
$ |
6,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
We expect our research and development costs related to livoletide
will decrease significantly due to our decision to discontinue the
program based on results from the Phase 2b ZEPHYR study in PWS. The
successful development of our product candidates is highly
uncertain. At this time, we cannot reasonably estimate or know the
nature, timing and costs of the efforts that will be necessary to
complete the remainder of the development of nevanimibe or MLE-301.
We are also unable to predict when, if ever, material net cash
inflows may commence from sales of nevanimibe, MLE-301 or any
future product candidates that we may develop due to the numerous
risks and uncertainties associated with clinical development,
including risks and uncertainties related to:
•the
ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, including the potential impact on
various aspects and stages of the clinical development
process;
•the
number of clinical sites included in the trials;
•the
length of time required to enroll suitable patients;
•the
number of patients that ultimately participate in the
trials;
•the
number of doses patients receive;
•the
duration of patient follow-up and number of patient
visits;
•the
results of our clinical trials;
•the
establishment of commercial manufacturing
capabilities;
•the
receipt of marketing approvals; and
•the
commercialization of product candidates.
We may never succeed in obtaining regulatory approval for
nevanimibe, MLE-301 or any future product candidates we may
develop. Product candidates in later stages of clinical
development, like nevanimibe, generally have higher development
costs than those in earlier stages of clinical development,
primarily due to the increased size and duration of later-stage
clinical trials.
General and administrative expense
General and administrative expense consists primarily of personnel
expenses, including salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation
expense, for employees in executive, finance, accounting, business
development, legal and human resource functions. General and
administrative expense also includes corporate facility costs,
including rent, utilities, depreciation and maintenance, not
otherwise included in research and development expense, as well as
legal fees related to intellectual property and corporate matters
and fees for accounting, recruiting and consulting
services.
Interest expense (income), net
Interest income represents amounts earned on our cash, cash
equivalents and restricted cash balances.
Results of operations
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2020 and
2019
The following table summarizes our operating results for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 |
|
2019 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
$ |
7,540 |
|
|
$ |
6,204 |
|
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
21.5 |
% |
General and administrative |
4,595 |
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
142 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
Loss from operations |
12,135 |
|
|
10,657 |
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
13.9 |
|
Other expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (income), net |
(162) |
|
|
(315) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
(48.6) |
|
Other loss |
25 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
4.2 |
|
Net loss |
$ |
(11,998) |
|
|
$ |
(10,366) |
|
|
$ |
(1,632) |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
Research and development expense
Research and development expense increased by $1.3 million to $7.5
million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 from $6.2
million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. The
following table summarizes our research and development expenses
for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and
2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 |
|
2019 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preclinical and clinical development expense |
$ |
5,528 |
|
|
$ |
4,093 |
|
|
$ |
1,435 |
|
|
35.1 |
% |
Compensation expense, other than stock-based
compensation |
1,474 |
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
300 |
|
|
423 |
|
|
(123) |
|
|
(29.1) |
|
Other expenses |
238 |
|
|
232 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
2.6 |
|
Total research and development expense |
$ |
7,540 |
|
|
$ |
6,204 |
|
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
21.5 |
% |
The increase in total research and development expense is
attributable to:
•a
$1.4 million increase in preclinical and clinical development
expense mainly related to the development of livoletide;
and
•a
$0.1 million decrease in stock-based compensation expenses
primarily related to certain changes in headcount.
General and administrative expense
General and administrative expense increased by $0.1 million to
$4.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 from
$4.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. The
increase was primarily due to a $0.8 million increase in
compensation and stock-based compensation expense as a result of an
increase in our general and administrative headcount and changes to
compensation arrangements. These increases were partially offset by
a decrease of $0.7 million in professional fees primarily as a
result of lower legal and accounting fees incurred as compared to
the prior period. Legal and accounting fees were higher in the
first quarter of 2019 due to administrative and other activities
following our merger with OvaScience, Inc. in December 2018 (the
“Merger”).
Interest income, net
Interest income, net decreased by $0.1 million to $0.2 million net
interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2020 from
net interest income of $0.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2019. The change was primarily due to lower interest
income received as a result of lower cash and cash equivalent and
marketable securities balances.
Other loss
Other loss increased by $1,000 to $25,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2020 from $24,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2019 due to higher foreign currency losses as a result of
exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a
currency other than our functional currency.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash flows
The following table sets forth the primary uses of cash and cash
equivalents for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and
2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
2019 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
$ |
(10,161) |
|
|
$ |
(10,601) |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(26) |
|
|
2,976 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
5,589 |
|
|
(60) |
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on
cash |
(37) |
|
|
(14) |
|
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted
cash |
$ |
(4,635) |
|
|
$ |
(7,699) |
|
Operating activities
During the three months ended March 31, 2020, we used $10.2 million
of cash to fund operating activities. During the three months ended
March 31, 2020, cash used in operating activities reflected our net
loss of $12.0 million and a net change in operating assets and
liabilities of $0.5 million, offset by non-cash charges of $1.4
million, principally related to stock-based compensation and the
amortization of our right-of-use ("ROU") assets.
During the three months ended March 31, 2019, we used $10.6 million
of cash in operating activities. Cash used in operating activities
reflected our net loss of $10.4 million and a net increase in
operating assets and liabilities of $1.3 million, offset by
non-cash charges of $1.0 million, principally related to
stock-based compensation.
Investing activities
During the three months ended March 31, 2020, we paid $26,000
in purchases of property and equipment. During the three months
ended March 31, 2019, we received $3.0 million in net proceeds from
the sale of marketable securities and paid $10,000 in purchases of
property and equipment.
Financing activities
During the three months ended March 31, 2020, we received proceeds
of $5.7 million received from the issuance of common stock, net of
issuance costs paid. See Note 1 of our Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information
related to the issuance of common stock. These proceeds were offset
by $0.2 million in the payment of financing costs. During the three
months ended March 31, 2019, we used cash of $45,000 in principal
loan repayments and $15,000 in the payment of financing
costs.
Funding requirements
We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing
activities, particularly as we continue the research and
development of, continue or initiate clinical trials of, and seek
marketing approval for, our product candidates. In addition, if we
obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we
expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to
program sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution to the
extent that such sales, marketing and distribution are not the
responsibility of potential collaborators. Furthermore, we expect
to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public
company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional
funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are
unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we may
would be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and
development programs or future commercialization efforts. The
COVID-19 pandemic continues to rapidly evolve and has already
resulted in a significant disruption of global financial markets.
If the disruption persists and deepens, we could experience an
inability to access additional capital, which could in the future
negatively affect our operations.
In April 2019, we entered into an “at-the-market” (“ATM”),
equity distribution agreement with Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
acting as sole agent with an aggregate offering value of up
to $50.0 million, which allows us to sell our common
shares through the facilities of the Nasdaq Capital Market. Subject
to the terms of the ATM equity distribution agreement, we are able
to determine, at our sole discretion, the timing and number of
shares to be sold under this ATM facility. In March 2020, we
amended and restated the equity distribution agreement to include
SVB Leerink LLC as an additional sales agent for the ATM. In March
2020, we sold 719,400 shares of its common stock under our ATM
equity distribution agreement for net proceeds of approximately
$5.7 million.
As of March 31, 2020, we had cash, cash equivalents and restricted
cash of $58.9 million, which we believe are sufficient to fund our
planned operations into 2022. This cash runway guidance is based on
our current operational plans and excludes any additional funding
that may be received and business development activities that may
be undertaken. In addition, our operating plans may change as a
result of many factors currently unknown to us, and we may need to
seek additional funds sooner than planned, through public or
private equity or debt financings, third-party funding, and
marketing and distribution arrangements, as well as other
collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements, or
a combination of these approaches. In any event, we will require
additional capital to pursue regulatory approval and the
commercialization of our current and future product
candidates.
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors,
including:
•the
scope, progress, results and costs of preclinical studies and
clinical trials;
•the
scope, prioritization and number of our research and development
programs;
•the
costs, timing and outcome of regulatory review of our product
candidates;
•our
ability to establish and maintain collaborations on favorable
terms, if at all;
•the
extent to which we are obligated to reimburse, or entitled to
reimbursement of, clinical trial costs under collaboration
agreements, if any;
•the
costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications,
maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property rights and
defending intellectual property-related claims;
•the
extent to which we acquire or in-license other product candidates
and technologies;
•the
costs of securing manufacturing arrangements for commercial
production; and
•the
costs of establishing or contracting for sales and marketing
capabilities if we obtain regulatory approvals to market our
product candidates.
Identifying potential product candidates and conducting preclinical
studies and clinical trials is a time-consuming, expensive and
uncertain process that takes many years to complete, and we
may never generate the necessary data or results required to obtain
marketing approval and achieve product sales. In addition, our
product candidates, if approved, may not achieve commercial
success. Our commercial revenues, if any, will be derived from
sales of product candidates that we do not expect to be
commercially available for many years, if at all. Accordingly,
we will need to continue to rely on additional financing to achieve
our business objectives. Adequate additional financing may not be
available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.
Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product
revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination
of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic
alliances and licensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise
additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt
securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms
of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences
that adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. Debt
financing, if available, may involve agreements that include
covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific
actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital
expenditures or declaring dividends.
If we raise funds through additional collaborations, strategic
alliances or licensing arrangements with third-parties, we may have
to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue
streams, research programs or product candidates or to grant
licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable
to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when
needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our
product development or future commercialization efforts or grant
rights to develop and market product candidates that we would
otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
In January 2020, we terminated our office lease agreement in Lyon,
France.
During the three months ended March 31, 2020, there were no other
material changes to our contractual obligations and commitments
described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of March 31,
2020, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation
S-K.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Other than as described under Note 2 to our Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements, the Critical Accounting Policies
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2019, as filed with the SEC on March 11, 2020,
have not materially changed.
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer), evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) as required by
paragraph (b) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15, as of March
31, 2020. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of March 31, 2020, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable
assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting
during the quarter ended March 31, 2020 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting. We have not experienced
any material impact to our internal controls over financial
reporting despite the fact that our employees are working remotely
due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We are continually monitoring and
assessing the COVID-19 situation on our internal controls to
minimize the impact on their design and operating
effectiveness.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, believes that our disclosure controls and
procedures and internal control over financial reporting are
designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their
objectives and are effective at the reasonable assurance level.
However, our management does not expect that our disclosure
controls and procedures or our internal control over financial
reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system,
no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the
control system are met. Further, the design of a control system
must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the
benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.
Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.
These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur
because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be
circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion
of two or more people or by management override of the controls.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon
certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and
there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving
its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time,
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may
deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a
cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud
may occur and not be detected.
PART II
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
On November 9, 2016, a purported shareholder derivative action was
filed in the Business Litigation Session of the Suffolk County
Superior Court in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
(Cima
v. Dipp,
No. 16-3443-BLS1 (Mass. Sup. Ct.)) against certain former officers
and directors of OvaScience and one current director of the Company
(a former director of OvaScience) and OvaScience as a nominal
defendant alleging breaches of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment,
abuse of control, gross mismanagement and corporate waste for
purported actions related to OvaScience’s January 2015 follow-on
public offering. On February 22, 2017, the court approved the
parties’ joint stipulation to stay all proceedings in the action
until further notice. Following a status conference in December
2017, the stay was lifted. On January 25, 2018, at the parties’
request, the court entered a second order staying all proceedings
in the action until further order of the court. On March 2, 2020,
the parties submitted a status report requesting that the Court
continue the stay. On March 5, 2020, the court entered an order
continuing the stay and requiring that the parties file a further
status report on or before June 30, 2020. We believe that the
complaint is without merit and intend to defend against the
litigation. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be
successful. At present, we are unable to estimate potential losses,
if any, related to the lawsuit.
On March 24, 2017, a purported shareholder class action lawsuit was
filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
(Dahhan
v. OvaScience, Inc.,
No. 1:17-cv-10511-IT (D. Mass.)) against OvaScience and certain
former officers and directors of OvaScience alleging violations of
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act (the "Dahhan Action").
On July 5, 2017, the court entered an order approving the
appointment of Freedman Family Investments LLC as lead plaintiff,
the firm of Robins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP as lead counsel and
the Law Office of Alan L. Kovacs as local counsel. Plaintiff filed
an amended complaint on August 25, 2017. We filed a motion to
dismiss the amended complaint, which the court denied on July 31,
2018. On August 14, 2018, we answered the amended complaint. On
December 9, 2019, the Court granted leave for plaintiff to file a
second amended complaint under seal and permitted defendants to
file a motion to strike the second amended complaint. On December
30, 2019, the Court granted the parties’ joint motion to stay all
proceedings in the case pending mediation.
On March 3, 2020, the parties conducted a mediation session.
As the mediation was unsuccessful, the parties are resuming
discovery, and the Company filed a motion to strike the second
amended complaint on May 1, 2020. We believe that the amended
complaint and the second amended complaint are without merit and
intend to defend against the litigation. There can be no assurance,
however, that we will be successful. A resolution of this lawsuit
adverse to the Company or the other defendants could have a
material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position
and results of operations. At present, we are unable to estimate
potential losses, if any, related to the lawsuit.
On July 27, 2017, a purported shareholder derivative complaint was
filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
(Chiu
v. Dipp,
No. 1:17-cv-11382-IT (D. Mass.)) against OvaScience, as a nominal
defendant, certain former officers and directors of OvaScience and
one current director of the Company (a former director of
OvaScience) alleging breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment
and violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act alleging that
compensation awarded to the director defendants was excessive and
seeking redress for purported actions related to OvaScience’s
January 2015 follow-on public offering and other public statements.
On September 26, 2017, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint
which eliminated all claims regarding allegedly excessive director
pay and additionally alleged claims of abuse of control and
corporate waste. On October 27, 2017, the defendants filed a motion
to dismiss the amended complaint. The court heard oral argument on
the motion to dismiss on April 5, 2018. On April 13, 2018, the
court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended
complaint for failure to state a claim for relief under Section
14(a). The court also dismissed the plaintiffs’ pendent state law
claims without prejudice, based on lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. On April 25, 2018, the plaintiffs moved for leave to
amend the complaint and to stay this case pending the outcome of
the Dahhan Action. We do not believe that the proposed amended
complaint cures the defects in the current complaint, but informed
plaintiffs’ counsel that, in the interest of judicial economy,
defendants would not oppose the proposed amendment if the court
would consider staying the case pending the resolution of the
Dahhan Action. On April 27, 2018, the court granted the plaintiffs’
motion for leave to amend the complaint and for a stay. On April
30, 2018, the plaintiffs filed their second amended complaint. On
May 23, 2018, the court entered an order staying this case pending
the resolution of the Dahhan Action. We believe that the complaint
is without merit and intend to defend against the litigation. There
can be no assurance, however, that we will be successful. At
present, we are unable to estimate potential losses, if any,
related to the lawsuit.
In addition to the matters described above, the Company may be a
party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary
course of business from time to time. Regardless of the outcome,
litigation can have an adverse impact on the Company because of
defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and
other factors.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as
general economic and business risks and the other information in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. The occurrence of
any of the following risks could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, results of operations and future
growth prospects or cause our actual results to differ materially
from those contained in forward-looking statements we have made in
this report and those we may make from time to time. In these
circumstances, the market price of our common stock could decline,
and you may lose all or part of your investment. We cannot assure
you that any of the events discussed below will not occur. Such
risks may be amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential
impact on our business and the global economy.
Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional
Capital
We have incurred significant operating losses since inception and
anticipate that we will continue to incur substantial operating
losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain
profitability.
Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses and
negative operating cash flows and there is no assurance that we
will ever achieve or sustain profitability. Our net loss was $27.2
million and $44.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2019, respectively. As of March 31, 2020, we had an accumulated
deficit of $220.7 million. We expect to continue to incur
significant expenses and increasing operating losses for the
foreseeable future. We have devoted substantially all of our
efforts to the acquisition of and preclinical and clinical
development of nevanimibe, a current product candidate, and
livoletide, which we discontinued the development of as a potential
treatment of patients with PWS in April 2020, as well as to
building our management team and infrastructure. It could be
several years, if ever, before we have a commercialized
product and our commercialized products, if any, may not be
profitable. The net losses we incur may fluctuate significantly
from quarter to quarter and year to year. We anticipate
that our expenses will increase significantly in connection with
our ongoing activities such as:
•continuing
the ongoing and planned clinical development of
nevanimibe;
•continuing
the preclinical development and potential clinical development of
MLE-301;
•initiating
preclinical studies and clinical trials for any additional diseases
for our current product candidates and any future product
candidates that we may pursue;
•building
a portfolio of product candidates through the acquisition or
in-license of drugs or product candidates and
technologies;
•developing,
maintaining, expanding and protecting our intellectual property
portfolio;
•manufacturing,
or having manufactured, clinical and commercial supplies of our
product candidates;
•seeking
marketing approvals for our current and future product candidates
that successfully complete clinical trials;
•establishing
a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure to commercialize
any product candidate for which we may obtain marketing
approval;
•hiring
additional administrative, clinical, regulatory and scientific
personnel; and
•continuing
to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public
company.
In order to become and remain profitable, we will need to develop
and eventually commercialize, on our own or with collaborators, one
or more product candidates with significant market potential. This
will require us to be successful in a range of challenging
activities, including completing clinical trials of nevanimibe and
MLE-301, developing commercial scale manufacturing processes,
obtaining marketing approval, manufacturing, marketing and selling
any current and future product candidates for which we may obtain
marketing approval, and satisfying any post-marketing requirements.
We may never succeed in any or all of these activities and, even if
we do, we may never generate revenue from product sales or achieve
profitability.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with
pharmaceutical products and development, we are unable to
accurately predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or
when, or if, we will be able to achieve profitability. If we are
required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA"), or
other regulatory authorities such as the European Medicines Agency
(the "EMA"), to amend existing studies or trials, to perform
studies and trials in addition to those currently expected, or if
there are any delays in the development or in the completion of any
planned or future preclinical studies or clinical trials of our
current or future product candidates, our expenses could increase
and profitability could be further delayed.
Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain
or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our
failure to become and remain profitable would decrease our value
and could impair our ability to raise capital, maintain our
research and development efforts, expand our business or continue
our operations. A decline in our value also could cause you to lose
all or part of your investment.
We have a limited operating history and have never generated any
revenue from product sales, which may make it difficult to assess
our future viability.
We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company with a limited
operating history. Our operations to date, with respect to the
development of our product candidates, have been limited to
organizing and staffing the business, business planning, raising
capital, acquiring our product candidates and other assets and
conducting preclinical and clinical development of our product
candidates. We have not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully
complete clinical development of a product candidate, obtain
marketing approval, manufacture a commercial-scale drug (or arrange
for a third-party to do so on our behalf), or conduct sales and
marketing activities necessary for successful commercialization.
Consequently, our predictions about our future success or viability
may not be as accurate as they could be if we had more experience
developing product candidates.
Our ability to generate revenue from product sales and achieve
profitability depends on our ability, alone or with any future
collaborations, to successfully complete the development of, and
obtain the regulatory approvals necessary to commercialize,
nevanimibe, MLE-301 and any additional product candidates that we
may pursue in the future. We do not anticipate generating revenue
from product sales for the next several years, if ever. Our
ability to generate revenue from product sales depends heavily on
our or any future collaborators’ success in:
•timely
and successful completion of development activities of our current
product candidates;
•obtaining
and maintaining regulatory and marketing approvals for nevanimibe,
MLE-301 and any future product candidates for which we successfully
complete clinical trials;
•launching
and commercializing any product candidates for which we obtain
regulatory and marketing approval by establishing a sales force,
marketing and distribution infrastructure or, alternatively,
collaborating with a commercialization partner;
•qualifying
for coverage and adequate reimbursement by government and
third-party payors for our current or any future product
candidates, if approved, both in the United States and
internationally, and reaching acceptable agreements with such
government and third-party payors on pricing terms;
•developing,
validating and maintaining a commercially viable, sustainable,
scalable, reproducible and transferable manufacturing process for
nevanimibe, MLE-301 or any future product candidates that are
compliant with current good manufacturing practices, or
cGMP;
•establishing
and maintaining supply and manufacturing relationships with
third-parties that can provide an adequate amount and quality of
drugs and services to support our planned clinical development, as
well as the market demand for nevanimibe, MLE-301 and any future
product candidates, if approved;
•obtaining
market acceptance, if and when approved, of nevanimibe, MLE-301 or
any future product candidates as a viable treatment option by
physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical
community;
•effectively
addressing any competing technological and market
developments;
•implementing
additional internal systems and infrastructure, as
needed;
•negotiating
favorable terms in any collaboration, licensing or other
arrangements into which we may enter, and performing our
obligations pursuant to such arrangements;
•maintaining,
protecting and expanding our portfolio of intellectual property
rights, including patents, trade secrets and know-how;
•avoiding
and defending against third-party interference or infringement
claims; and
•attracting,
hiring and retaining qualified personnel.
We will require additional capital to finance our operations, which
may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Failure to
obtain capital when needed may force us to delay, limit or
terminate certain of our development programs, future
commercialization efforts or other operations.
We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing
activities, particularly as we continue to develop, and if
approved, commercialize, nevanimibe and MLE-301. Additionally, if
we obtain marketing approval for our product candidates, we expect
to incur significant expenses related to manufacturing, marketing,
sales and distribution. Furthermore, we expect to continue to incur
additional costs associated with operating as a public
company.
As of March 31, 2020, our cash, cash equivalents and restricted
cash were $58.9 million. Our existing cash, cash equivalents and
restricted cash are currently expected to be sufficient to fund our
current operating plans into 2022. This cash runway guidance is
based on our current operational plans and excludes any additional
funding that may be received and business development activities
that may be undertaken. In addition, our operating plans may change
as a result of many factors currently unknown to us, including the
short- and long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and we may
need to seek additional funds sooner than planned, through public
or private equity or debt financings, third-party funding, and
marketing and distribution arrangements, as well as other
collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements, or
a combination of these approaches. In any event, we will require
additional capital to pursue preclinical and clinical activities,
regulatory approval and the commercialization of our current and
future product candidates. Even if we believe we have sufficient
capital for our current operating plans, we may seek additional
capital if market conditions are favorable or if we have specific
strategic considerations. If we elect to do so, additional capital
may not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. Our
ability to access additional capital, and as a result our operating
results and liquidity needs, could be negatively affected by market
fluctuations and economic downturn. The COVID-19 pandemic has
already resulted in a significant disruption of global financial
markets. If the disruption persists and deepens, we could
experience an inability to access additional capital, which could
negatively affect our business. Any additional capital raising
efforts may divert our management from its day-to-day activities,
which may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize
our current and future product candidates.
Raising additional capital by issuing equity or debt securities may
cause dilution to our existing stockholders, and raising funds
through lending and licensing arrangements may restrict our
operations or require us to relinquish proprietary
rights.
Until such time as we can generate substantial revenue from product
sales, if ever, we expect to finance our cash needs through a
combination of equity and debt financings, strategic alliances and
license and development agreements in connection with any future
collaborations. To the extent that we raise additional capital by
issuing equity securities, our existing stockholders’ ownership may
experience substantial dilution, and the terms of these securities
may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect
your rights as a stockholder. Equity and debt financing, if
available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting
or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as
redeeming our shares, making investments, incurring additional
debt, making capital expenditures or declaring
dividends.
The incurrence of indebtedness could result in increased fixed
payment obligations and we may be required to agree to certain
restrictive covenants therein, such as limitations on our ability
to incur additional debt, limitations on our ability to acquire,
sell or license intellectual property rights and other operating
restrictions that could adversely affect our ability to conduct our
business.
If we raise additional capital through collaborations, strategic
alliances or third-party licensing arrangements, we may have to
relinquish valuable rights to our intellectual property, future
revenue streams, research programs or product candidates, or grant
licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable
to raise additional capital through equity or debt financings when
needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our
product development or future commercialization efforts, or grant
rights to develop and market product candidates that we would
otherwise develop and market ourselves.
We may be required to make payments under licenses applicable to
nevanimibe and MLE-301.
We have certain milestone and royalty payments related to
nevanimibe and MLE-301. We acquired worldwide, exclusive rights to
nevanimibe pursuant to our license agreement with the Regents of
the University of Michigan (the "University of
Michigan"), entered into in June 2013 (the "UM License
Agreement"). Under the terms of the UM License Agreement, we are
obligated to make significant milestone and royalty payments in
connection with the attainment of certain development steps and the
sale of resulting products with respect to nevanimibe, as well as
other material obligations. We acquired worldwide, exclusive rights
to MLE-301 pursuant to a license agreement with F. Hoffmann-La
Roche Ltd and Hoffman-La Roche Inc. (collectively, "Roche," and
such agreement, the "Roche License Agreement."). Under the terms of
the Roche License Agreement, we are obligated to make significant
milestone and royalty payments in connection with the attainment of
certain development steps and the sale of resulting products with
respect to MLE-301, as well as other material obligations. In
addition, we are required to share a portion of any net proceeds
received in connection with certain agreements that we may enter
into with third-parties to develop and commercialize MLE-301. If
milestone or other non-royalty obligations become due, we may not
have sufficient funds available to meet our obligations, which will
materially adversely affect our business operations and financial
condition. If milestone or other non-royalty obligations become
due, we may not have sufficient funds available to meet our
obligations, which will materially adversely affect our business
operations and financial condition.
We may expend our limited resources to pursue a particular product
candidate or disease and fail to capitalize on product candidates
or diseases that may be more profitable or for which there is a
greater likelihood of success.
Because we have limited financial and managerial resources, we
focus on research programs and product candidates for specific
indications. As a result, we may forego or delay pursuit of
opportunities with respect to our own product candidates for
additional indications and other product candidates or diseases
that later prove to have greater commercial potential. Our resource
allocation decisions may ultimately not result in successful
clinical development programs and may cause us to fail to
capitalize on other viable product candidates, commercial products
or profitable market opportunities. In addition, our spending on
current and future research and development programs and product
candidates for specific indications may not yield any commercially
viable products. For example, we discontinued the development of
livoletide as a potential treatment of patients with PWS after
receiving results from the Phase 2b trial in April
2020.
Further, if we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential
or target market for a particular product candidate, we may
relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through sale,
collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in
which it would have been advantageous for us to retain sole
development and commercialization rights, which could materially
adversely affect our business operations and financial
condition.
Risks Related to Development and Commercialization
Our future success is dependent on the successful clinical
development, regulatory approval and subsequent commercialization
of nevanimibe, MLE-301 and any future product candidates. If we are
not able to obtain the required regulatory approvals, we will not
be able to commercialize our current or future product candidates
and our ability to generate revenue will be adversely
affected.
We do not have any drugs that have received regulatory approval and
may never be able to develop marketable product candidates. An
inability to effectively commercialize our product candidates and
to maximize their potential where possible through successful
research and development activities, whether due to the impacts of
the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic or otherwise, could have an adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations
and growth prospects.
We expect that a substantial portion of our efforts and expenses
for the foreseeable future will be devoted to the clinical
development of nevanimibe and MLE-301 and, as a result, our
business currently depends heavily on the successful development,
regulatory approval and commercialization of nevanimibe and
MLE-301. We cannot be certain that nevanimibe or MLE-301 will
receive regulatory approval or be successfully commercialized even
if we receive regulatory approval. The research, testing,
manufacturing, safety, efficacy, labeling, approval, sale,
marketing and distribution of our product candidates are, and will
remain, subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA and other
regulatory agencies in the United States and similar foreign
regulatory authorities. Failure to obtain regulatory approval for
nevanimibe or MLE-301 in the United States or other jurisdictions
will prevent us from commercializing and marketing nevanimibe and
MLE-301.
Even if we were to successfully obtain approval from the FDA and
comparable foreign regulatory authorities for our product
candidates, any approval might contain significant limitations
related to use restrictions for specified age groups, warnings,
precautions or contraindications, or may be subject to burdensome
post-approval study or risk management requirements. If we are
unable to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates, or
any approval contains significant limitations, on our own or with
any future collaborators, we may not be able to obtain sufficient
funding or generate sufficient revenue to continue the development
of any other product candidate that we may in-license, develop or
acquire in the future.
Furthermore, even if we obtain regulatory approval for nevanimibe
or MLE-301, we will still need to develop a commercial
infrastructure, or otherwise develop relationships with
collaborators to commercialize, establish a commercially viable
pricing structure and obtain approval for adequate reimbursement
from third-party and government payors. If we, or our
collaborators, are unable to successfully commercialize nevanimibe
or MLE-301, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to
continue our business.
Preclinical studies or earlier clinical trials are not necessarily
predictive of future results and the results of our clinical trials
may not support our nevanimibe or MLE-301 claims.
Nevanimibe is still in development and will require additional
clinical testing before we are prepared to submit an NDA or other
similar application for regulatory approval. MLE-301 is currently
in preclinical studies but will also require clinical testing
before we are prepared to submit an NDA or other similar
application for regulatory approval. We cannot predict with any
certainty if or when we might submit an NDA for regulatory approval
for nevanimibe or MLE-301 for the treatment of the indications we
are pursuing or whether any such application will be approved by
the relevant regulatory authority. Human clinical trials are very
expensive and difficult to design and implement, in part because
they are subject to rigorous regulatory requirements. For instance,
the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities may not agree with our
proposed endpoints for any clinical trials of nevanimibe or
MLE-301, even if validated in prior clinical trials of similar
product candidates, which may delay the commencement of our future
clinical trials. The FDA or foreign regulatory authorities may also
not agree with our proposed trial designs or dosing regimens, which
may likewise prevent or delay the commencement of our future
clinical trials. The clinical trial process is also time-consuming.
We estimate that clinical trials of nevanimibe and MLE-301 for the
indications we are pursuing will take the next several years to
complete. Failure can occur at any stage of the trials, and we
could encounter problems that cause us to abandon or repeat
clinical trials. For example, we discontinued the development of
livoletide as a potential treatment of patients with PWS after
receiving results from the Phase 2b trial in April 2020. Further,
we may encounter challenges in the clinical development of product
candidates for reasons unrelated to the observed safety or efficacy
of such product candidates in prior clinical trials. For example,
and as previously disclosed, in our Phase 2 clinical trial for the
treatment of
Cushing’s syndrome ("CS"),
we experienced slower than anticipated enrollment, which could have
made impractical further development of nevanimibe for the
treatment of CS. As a result of the difficulty in enrolling this
trial, we discontinued this Phase 2 clinical trial in August 2019
and suspended development of nevanimibe for the treatment of CS. In
addition, because we may at times pursue the treatment of multiple
indications for a single product candidate, setbacks or failures
in, or termination of, clinical development for one indication may
have a negative impact on the clinical development for the
treatment of other indications.
Success in preclinical testing and early clinical trials does not
ensure that later and/or pivotal clinical trials will generate the
same results, or otherwise provide adequate data to demonstrate the
safety and efficacy of a product candidate. Frequently, product
candidates that have shown promising results in early clinical
trials have subsequently suffered significant setbacks in later or
pivotal clinical trials. For example, we expended substantial time
and resources on a previous product candidate, MLE4901, an NK3R
antagonist, which we ceased developing in 2017 due to concerns
relating to elevated liver enzymes observed in clinical trials that
weren’t observed in preclinical testing or early clinical
trials.
Our approach to targeting endocrine diseases where current
therapies do not exist or are insufficient, is novel and unproven,
and as such, the cost and time needed to develop nevanimibe and
MLE-301 is difficult to predict and our efforts may not be
successful. If we do not observe favorable results in future or
planned clinical trials of nevanimibe or MLE-301, we may decide to
delay or abandon development of nevanimibe or MLE-301, which could
harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. A
number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered
significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to lack of
efficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding promising
results in earlier trials.
We may encounter substantial delays in our clinical trials or we
may fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of
applicable regulatory authorities.
Before obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for
the sale of nevanimibe, MLE-301 and any future product candidates,
we must conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety
and efficacy of the product candidate for its intended indication.
We cannot guarantee that any clinical trials will be conducted as
planned or completed on schedule, if at all. A failure of one or
more clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. Events that
may prevent successful or timely completion of clinical development
include:
•direct
and indirect effects of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on various
aspects and stages of the clinical development
process;
•significant
reprioritization and diversion of healthcare resources away from
the conduct of clinical trials as a result of the ongoing COVID-19
pandemic, including the diversion of hospitals serving as our
clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of
our clinical trials;
•failure
to obtain regulatory approval to commence a trial;
•unforeseen
safety issues;
•determination
of dosing issues;
•lack
of effectiveness during clinical trials;
•inability
to reach agreement on acceptable terms with prospective contract
research organizations, or CROs, and clinical trial
sites;
•slower
than expected rates of patient recruitment, failure to recruit
adequate numbers of suitable patients to participate in our
clinical trials or failure to maintain participation of recruited
patients in clinical trials;
•interruption
of key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site
monitoring, due to limitations on travel, quarantines or social
distancing protocols imposed or recommended by federal or state
governments, employers and others in connection with the ongoing
COVID-19 pandemic;
•failure
to manufacture sufficient quantities of a product candidate for use
in clinical trials;
•inability
to monitor patients adequately during or after treatment;
and
•inability
or unwillingness of medical investigators to follow our clinical
protocols.
Further, we, the FDA, an institutional review board, or other
regulatory authority may suspend our clinical trials at any time if
it appears that we or our collaborators are failing to conduct a
trial in accordance with regulatory requirements, including, for
example, the FDA’s good clinical practice, or GCP, regulations,
that we are exposing participants to unacceptable health risks, or
if the FDA or other regulatory authority, as the case may be, finds
deficiencies in our investigational new drug, or IND, application
or other submissions, or the manner in which the clinical trials
are conducted. Therefore, we cannot predict with any certainty the
schedule for commencement and completion of future clinical trials.
If we experience delays in the commencement or completion of our
clinical trials, or if we terminate a clinical trial prior to
completion, the commercial prospects of our current and future
product candidates could be harmed, and our ability to generate
revenue from our current or future product candidates, once
approved, may be delayed or eliminated. In addition, any delays in
our clinical trials could increase our costs, slow down the
approval process and jeopardize our ability to commence product
sales and generate revenue. Any of these occurrences may harm our
business, financial condition and results of operations. In
addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in
the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also
ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product
candidates.
Moreover, principal investigators for our clinical trials may serve
as our scientific advisors or consultants from time to time and
receive compensation in connection with such services. We will be
required to report these relationships to the FDA or other
regulatory authorities as part of the drug approval process. The
FDA or other regulatory authorities may conclude that a financial
relationship between us and a principal investigator has created a
conflict of interest or otherwise affected interpretation of the
trial results. They may therefore question the integrity of the
data generated at the applicable clinical trial site and the
utility of the clinical trial itself may be jeopardized. This could
result in a delay in approval, or rejection, of our marketing
applications by the FDA or other regulatory authority, as the case
may be, and may ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval
of one or more of our product candidates.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, for nevanimibe, we have experienced a
disruption in our ability to enroll and assess patients in our
Phase 2b study, and enrollment in the study is currently paused.
For our trials of nevanimibe or MLE-301, we may in the future
experience additional disruptions or delays in our ability to
initiate trial sites, enroll and assess patients, maintain patient
enrollment, acquire supplies of study drug, report trial results,
or interact with regulators, ethics committees or other important
agencies due to limitations in employee resources or otherwise. In
addition, some patients may not be able to comply with clinical
trial protocols if quarantines or shelter-in-place orders impede
patient movement or interrupt healthcare services. Similarly, our
ability to recruit and retain patients and principal investigators
and site staff who, as healthcare providers, may have heightened
exposure to COVID-19 and adversely impact our clinical trial
operations.
In light of the ongoing COVID-19
pandemic, we have taken measures to implement remote and virtual
approaches to clinical development, including remote patient
monitoring and home delivery of drug treatments where possible, and
if the COVID-19 pandemic continues and persists for an extended
period of time, we could experience significant disruptions to our
clinical development timelines, which would adversely affect our
business, financial condition, results of operations and growth
prospects.
We have never obtained marketing approval for a product candidate
and we may be unable to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining,
marketing approval for our current product candidates or any future
product candidates that we may develop.
We have never obtained marketing approval for a product candidate.
It is possible that the FDA may refuse to accept for substantive
review any NDAs that we submit for our product candidates or may
conclude after review of our data that our application is
insufficient to obtain marketing approval of our product
candidates. If the FDA does not accept or approve our NDAs for any
of our product candidates, it may require that we conduct
additional clinical trials, preclinical studies or manufacturing
validation studies and submit that data before it will reconsider
our applications. Depending on the extent of these or any other
FDA-required trials or studies, approval of any NDA or application
that we submit may be delayed by several years or may require
us to expend more resources than we have available. It is also
possible that additional trials or studies, if performed and
completed, may not be considered sufficient by the FDA to approve
our NDAs.
Any delay in obtaining, or an inability to obtain, marketing
approvals would prevent us from commercializing our product
candidates, generating revenues and achieving and sustaining
profitability. If any of these outcomes occurs, we may be forced to
abandon our development efforts for our product candidates, which
could significantly harm our business, prospects, operating results
and financial condition.
Enrollment and retention of patients in clinical trials is a
competitive, expensive and time-consuming process and could be made
more difficult or rendered impossible by multiple factors outside
our control.
Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in our clinical
trials is critical to our success. We may encounter delays in
enrolling, or be unable to enroll, a sufficient number of patients
to complete any of our clinical trials, and even once enrolled we
may be unable to retain a sufficient number of patients to complete
any of our trials. Patient enrollment and retention in clinical
trials, including our Phase 2b clinical trial of nevanimibe in
patients with CAH and planned clinical trial for MLE-301, depends
on many factors, including: the size of the patient population, the
nature of the trial protocol, our ability to recruit clinical trial
investigators with the appropriate competencies and experience, the
existing body of safety and efficacy data with respect to the study
drug, the number and nature of competing treatments and ongoing
clinical trials of competing drugs for the same disease, the
proximity of patients to clinical sites and the eligibility
criteria for the trials, our ability to obtain and maintain patient
consents and the risk that patients enrolled in clinical trials
will drop out of the trials before completion.
Patient enrollment may also be affected by the ongoing COVID-19
pandemic due to the prioritization of hospitalization resources
toward this pandemic, exposure of healthcare providers to COVID-19
and difficulties for patients to access clinical trial sites and
comply with clinical trial protocols. For example, enrollment in
the Phase 2b study of nevanimibe for patients with CAH is currently
paused as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. While we have taken
measures to implement remote and virtual approaches to clinical
development, including remote patient monitoring and home delivery
of drug treatments where possible, we cannot at this time fully
forecast the scope of impacts that the COVID-19 pandemic may have
on our ability to initiate trial sites, enroll and assess patients,
acquire supplies of study drug and report trial
results.
The competitive nature of clinical trials in the pharmaceutical and
biotechnology industries may make it difficult for us to recruit a
sufficient number of patients to complete any of our clinical
trials or may increase costs. We may not be able to initiate or
continue to support clinical trials of our product candidates for
one or more indications, or any future product candidates, if we
are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible
participants in these trials as required by the FDA or other
regulatory authorities. For example, in our Phase 2 clinical trial
for CS we experienced slower than anticipated enrollment, which
could have made impractical further development of nevanimibe for
the treatment of CS. As a result of the difficulty in enrolling
this trial, we elected to discontinue this Phase 2 clinical trial
in August 2019 and suspended development of nevanimibe for the
treatment of CS. Even if we are able to enroll a sufficient number
of patients in our clinical trials, if the pace of enrollment is
slower than we expect, the development costs for our product
candidates may increase and the completion of our trials may be
delayed or our trials could become too expensive or impractical to
complete.
Furthermore, any negative results we may report in clinical trials
of our product candidates may make it difficult or impossible to
recruit and retain patients in other clinical trials of those
product candidates. Delays or failures in planned patient
enrollment or retention may result in increased costs, program
delays or both, which could have a harmful effect on our ability to
develop nevanimibe or could render further development impossible.
For example, enrollment in the Phase 2b study of nevanimibe for
patients with CAH is currently paused as a result of the COVID-19
pandemic. In addition, we may rely on CROs and
clinical
trial sites to ensure proper and timely conduct of our future
clinical trials and, while we have and would in the future intend
to enter into agreements governing their services, we will be
limited in our ability to compel their actual
performance.
Our product candidates may cause undesirable side effects or have
other properties that could delay or prevent their regulatory
approval, limit their commercial potential or result in significant
negative consequences following any potential marketing
approval.
During the conduct of clinical trials, clinical investigators
monitor changes in patients’ health, including illnesses, injuries
and discomforts. Often, it is not possible to determine whether or
not the product candidate being investigated caused these
conditions, and regulatory authorities may draw different
conclusions or require additional testing to confirm these
determinations if they occur. In addition, it is possible that as
we test nevanimibe or any other product candidate in larger, longer
and more extensive clinical programs, or as use of any current or
future product candidates becomes more widespread if they receive
regulatory approval, illnesses, injuries, discomforts and other
adverse events that were observed in earlier trials, as well as
conditions that did not occur or went undetected in previous
trials, will be observed or reported by subjects. If clinical
testing indicates that nevanimibe, MLE-301 or any future product
candidate has side effects or causes serious or life-threatening
side effects, we may need to change the design of ongoing clinical
trials or adjust dosing levels in ongoing or future clinical
trials, and the development of the product candidate may be delayed
or terminated entirely. Further, if the product candidate has
received regulatory approval, such approval may be revoked, which
would materially harm our business, prospects, operating results
and financial condition.
Moreover, if we elect or are required to modify, delay, suspend or
terminate any clinical trial for our product candidates, the
commercial prospects of our product candidates may be harmed and
our ability to generate revenue through their sale may be delayed
or eliminated. Any of these occurrences may harm our business,
financial condition and prospects significantly.
We face substantial competition, and our operating results will
suffer if we fail to compete effectively.
The commercialization of new drugs is competitive, and we may face
worldwide competition from major pharmaceutical companies,
specialty pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies and
ultimately generic companies. Our competitors may develop or market
therapies that are more effective, safer or less costly than any
that we are commercializing, or may obtain regulatory or
reimbursement approval for their therapies more rapidly than we may
obtain approval for ours.
We are aware of a number of other clinical stage companies that are
working to develop drugs that would compete, directly or
indirectly, against nevanimibe for the treatment of CAH and MLE-301
for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms, or VMS.
We are aware of four other companies developing treatments for
patients with CAH: Diurnal Group PLC is developing an exogenous
cortisol treatment with a modified release intended to more closely
match the physiological release profile of cortisol but recently
announced a failed Phase 3 study and placed their United States
development activities on hold. Diurnal Group PLC submitted a
Market Authorization Application to the EMA in December of 2019.
Both Spruce Biosciences, Inc and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. are
developing CRF1 antagonists and have completed Phase 2 studies in
adults with CAH. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. has announced the
initiation of a Phase 2 study in a pediatric CAH population and
announced their intention to start an adult Phase 3 CAH
study
of their product candidate crinecerfont
in mid-2020. Spruce Biosciences has announced intentions to conduct
two Phase 2b studies in adults with CAH as well as initiate a
pediatric Phase 2 study.
Preclinically,
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. is evaluating a gene therapy program
(BBP-631) to treat CAH and has announced plans to file an IND in
2020.
We are aware of four competing NK3R antagonists currently in
clinical development for VMS. Astellas is developing fezolinetant
and has announced the initiation of their Phase 3 VMS program.
KaNDy Therapeutics has recently announced preliminary positive
topline data for NT-814, a dual NK1/3 receptor antagonist, with
full trial results yet to be disclosed. Sojournix is currently
studying SJX-653 in a Phase 2 trial. Additionally, Acer
Therapeutics has announced their intentions to develop osanetant,
an NK3R antagonist, for induced vasomotor symptoms stemming from
hormonal therapies used to treat breast and prostate
cancer,
but have not announced intentions of developing this product
candidate for menopausal vasomotor symptoms.
Many of our existing or potential competitors may have
substantially greater financial, technical and human resources than
we do, and significantly greater experience in the discovery and
development of product candidates, including in the recruitment of
patients for clinical trials, as well as in obtaining regulatory
approvals of those product candidates in the United States and in
foreign countries. Our current and potential future competitors may
also have significantly more experience commercializing drugs that
have been approved for marketing. If we are not able to compete
effectively against existing and potential competitors, our
business and financial condition may be harmed.
Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology
industries could result in even more resources being concentrated
among a small number of our competitors. Competition may reduce the
number and types of patients available to us to participate in
clinical trials, because some patients who might have opted to
enroll in our trials may instead opt to enroll in a trial being
conducted by one of our competitors.
Competition may further increase as a result of advances in the
commercial applicability of technologies and greater availability
of capital for investment in these industries. Our competitors may
succeed in developing, acquiring or licensing, on an exclusive
basis, drugs that are more effective or less costly than any
product candidate that we may develop.
Any inability to successfully complete clinical development of a
product candidate could result in additional costs or impair or
eliminate our ability to generate revenue from future sales of such
product candidate, if approved, or from any regulatory and
commercialization milestone with respect to such product candidate.
In addition, if we make manufacturing or formulation changes to
nevanimibe, MLE-301 or any future product candidates, we may need
to conduct additional testing to bridge our modified product
candidates to earlier versions. Clinical trial delays could also
shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to
commercialize nevanimibe, MLE-301 or any future product candidates,
or allow our competitors to bring comparable drugs to market before
we do, which could impair our ability to successfully commercialize
nevanimibe, MLE-301 or any future product candidates, and may harm
our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Established pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies may invest
heavily to accelerate discovery and development of novel compounds
or to in-license novel compounds that could make nevanimibe or
MLE-301 less competitive. In addition, any new product that
competes with an approved product must demonstrate compelling
advantages in efficacy, convenience, tolerability and safety in
order to overcome price competition and to be commercially
successful. Accordingly, our competitors may succeed in obtaining
patent protection, discovering, developing and receiving FDA or
other regulatory authority approval, or commercializing drugs
before we do, which would have an adverse impact on our business
and results of operations.
The availability of our competitors’ products could limit the
demand and the price we are able to charge for any product
candidate we develop. The inability to compete with existing or
subsequently introduced drugs would harm our business, prospects,
financial condition and results of operations.
The regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign
authorities are lengthy, time consuming and inherently
unpredictable, and even if we obtain approval for a product
candidate in one country or jurisdiction, we may never obtain
approval for, or commercialize, that product candidate in any other
jurisdiction, which would limit our ability to realize our full
market potential.
Prior to obtaining approval to commercialize a product candidate in
any jurisdiction, we or our collaborators must demonstrate with
substantial evidence from well-controlled clinical trials, and to
the satisfaction of the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies, that
such product candidates are safe and effective for their intended
uses. Results from preclinical studies and clinical trials can be
interpreted in different ways. Even if our product candidates meet
their safety and efficacy endpoints in clinical trials, the FDA or
foreign regulatory agencies may believe the clinical trials do not
show the appropriate balance of safety and efficacy in the
indication being sought or may interpret the data differently than
we do, and deem the results insufficient to demonstrate the
appropriate balance of safety and efficacy at the level required
for product approval. Further, the regulatory authorities may not
complete their review processes in a timely manner, or we may
otherwise not be able to obtain regulatory approval. Additional
delays may result if an FDA Advisory Committee or other regulatory
authority recommends non-approval or restrictions on approval. In
addition, we may experience delays or rejections based upon
additional government regulation from future legislation or
administrative action, or changes in regulatory authority policy
during the period of product development, clinical trials and the
review process.
Further, in order to market any products in any particular
jurisdiction, we must establish and comply with numerous and
varying regulatory requirements on a country-by-country basis
regarding safety and efficacy. Approval by the FDA in the United
States does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in any
other country or jurisdiction. In addition, clinical trials
conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory
authorities in other countries, and regulatory approval in one
country does not guarantee regulatory approval in any other
country. Approval processes vary among countries and can involve
additional product testing and validation and additional
administrative review periods. Seeking foreign regulatory approval
could result in difficulties and costs for us and require
additional preclinical studies or clinical trials, which could be
costly and time consuming. We do not have any product candidates
approved for sale in any jurisdiction, including in international
markets, and we do not have experience in obtaining regulatory
approval in international markets. If we fail to comply with
regulatory requirements in international markets or to obtain and
maintain required approvals, or if regulatory approvals in
international markets are delayed, our target market will be
reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of any
product we develop will be unrealized.
The FDA or any foreign regulatory bodies can delay, limit or deny
approval of our product candidates or require us to conduct
additional preclinical or clinical testing or abandon a program for
many reasons, including:
•the
FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s disagreement with
the design or implementation of our clinical trials;
•negative
or ambiguous results from our clinical trials or results that may
not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA
or comparable foreign regulatory agencies for
approval;
•serious
and unexpected drug-related side effects experienced by
participants in our clinical trials or by individuals using drugs
similar to our product candidates;
•our
inability to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or the
applicable foreign regulatory body that our product candidates are
safe and effective for the proposed indication;
•the
FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s disagreement
with the interpretation of data from preclinical studies or
clinical trials;
•our
inability to demonstrate the clinical and other benefits of our
product candidates outweigh any safety or other perceived
risks;
•the
FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s requirement for
additional preclinical studies or clinical trials;
•the
FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s disagreement
regarding the formulation, labeling or the specifications of our
product candidates;
•the
FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s failure to
approve the manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party
manufacturers with which we contract, including failure of such
manufacturers to pass the required pre-approval inspections;
or
•the
potential for approval policies or regulations of the FDA or the
applicable foreign regulatory agencies to significantly change in a
manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for
approval.
Even if we eventually complete clinical testing and receive
approval of an NDA or foreign marketing application for our product
candidates, the FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory agency may
grant approval contingent on the performance of costly additional
clinical trials, including Phase 4 clinical trials, or the
implementation of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or
REMS, which may be required to ensure safe use of the drug after
approval. The FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory agency also
may approve a product candidate for a more limited indication or
patient population than we originally requested, and the FDA or
applicable foreign regulatory agency may not approve the labeling
that we believe is necessary or desirable for the successful
commercialization of a product candidate. Any delay in obtaining,
or inability to obtain, applicable regulatory approval would delay
or prevent commercialization of that product candidate and would
negatively impact our business and results of
operations.
If we are not able to obtain orphan drug designations or
exclusivity for any of our current or future product candidates for
which we seek such designation, the potential profitability of any
such product candidates could be limited.
Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the United
States, may designate drugs for relatively small patient
populations as orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act of 1983, the
FDA may designate a product as an orphan drug if the treatment is
intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally
defined as a patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals
in the United States. Generally, if a product with an orphan drug
designation subsequently receives the first marketing approval for
a disease for which it receives the designation, then the product
is entitled to a period of marketing exclusivity that precludes the
applicable regulatory authority from approving another marketing
application for the same product for the same disease for the
exclusivity period except in limited situations. For purposes of
small molecule drugs, the FDA defines “same drug” as a drug that
contains the same active moiety and is intended for the same use as
the drug in question.
Nevanimibe has received orphan drug designation from the FDA and
the EMA for the treatment of CAH. We may also seek orphan drug
designation, where applicable, for our current product candidates
in additional indications or for our future product candidates.
However, obtaining an orphan drug designation can be difficult and
we may not be successful in doing so for any of
our current or future product candidates, in any applicable
indication. Even if we were to obtain orphan drug designation for a
product candidate, we may not obtain orphan exclusivity and that
exclusivity may not effectively protect the product candidate from
the competition of different products or drugs for the same
condition, which could be approved during the exclusivity period.
Additionally, after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA could
subsequently approve another application for the same product for
the same disease if the FDA concludes that the later product is
shown to be safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to
patient care. Orphan drug exclusive marketing rights in the United
States also may be lost if the FDA later determines that the
request for designation was materially defective, the prevalence of
the orphan disease is found to increase such that the qualifying
criterion is no longer met or if the manufacturer is unable to
assure sufficient quantity of the product to meet the needs of
patients with the rare disease or condition. The failure to obtain
an orphan drug designation for any product candidates we may
develop and seek it for, the inability to maintain that designation
for the duration of the applicable period, or the inability to
obtain or maintain orphan drug exclusivity could reduce our ability
to make sufficient sales of the applicable product candidates to
balance our expenses incurred to develop it, which would have a
negative impact on our operational results and financial
condition.
If we are not able to obtain required regulatory approvals, we will
not be able to commercialize nevanimibe or MLE-301 and our ability
to generate revenue will be harmed.
Nevanimibe and MLE-301, and the activities associated with their
development and commercialization, including their design,
research, testing, manufacture, safety, efficacy, recordkeeping,
labeling, packaging, storage, approval, advertising, promotion,
sale and distribution, are subject to comprehensive regulation by
the FDA and other regulatory agencies in the United States and by
similar regulatory authorities outside the United States. Failure
to obtain marketing approval for nevanimibe or MLE-301 or failure
to meet post-marketing requirements will prevent us from
commercializing nevanimibe or MLE-301.
We have not yet received approval from regulatory authorities to
market any product candidate in any jurisdiction, and it is
possible that nevanimibe, MLE-301 or any future product candidates
will never obtain the appropriate regulatory approvals necessary
for us to commence product sales. Neither we nor any future
collaborator is permitted to market any of our product candidates
in the United States until we receive regulatory approval of an NDA
from the FDA.
The time required to obtain approval of an NDA by the FDA is
unpredictable but typically takes many years following the
commencement of clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors,
including the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities.
Prior to submitting an NDA to the FDA or an equivalent application
to other foreign regulatory authorities for approval of nevanimibe
for the treatment of CAH and MLE-301 for the treatment of VMS, we
will need to complete its currently planned registration clinical
trials and any additional trials that the FDA may require us to
complete.
Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it is possible that we could
experience delays in the timing of our interactions with regulatory
authorities due to absenteeism by governmental employees, inability
to conduct planned physical inspections related to regulatory
approval, or the diversion of regulatory authority efforts and
attention to approval of other therapeutics or other activities
related to COVID-19, which could delay anticipated approval
decisions and otherwise delay or limit our ability to make planned
regulatory submissions or obtain new product approvals.
Additionally, if the results of our clinical trials are
inconclusive or if there are safety concerns or serious adverse
events associated with nevanimibe or MLE-301, we may:
•be
delayed in obtaining marketing approval for nevanimibe or MLE-301,
if at all;
•obtain
approval for indications or patient populations that are not as
broad as intended or desired;
•obtain
approval with labeling that includes significant use or
distribution restrictions or safety warnings;
•be
subject to additional post-marketing testing
requirements;
•be
required to perform additional clinical trials to support approval
or be subject to additional post-marketing testing
requirements;
•have
regulatory authorities withdraw, or suspend, their approval of the
drug or impose restrictions on its distribution in the form of
REMS;
•be
subject to the addition of labeling statements, such as warnings or
contraindications;
•be
sued; or
•experience
damage to our reputation.
Furthermore, approval policies, regulations, or the type and amount
of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during the
course of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary
among jurisdictions.
We may rely on third-party CROs and consultants to assist us in
filing and supporting the applications necessary to gain marketing
approvals. Securing marketing approval requires the submission of
extensive preclinical and clinical data and supporting information
to regulatory authorities for each disease to establish the safety
and efficacy of nevanimibe, MLE-301 and any future product
candidate for that disease. Securing marketing approval also
requires the submission of information about the product
manufacturing process to, and inspection of manufacturing
facilities by, the regulatory authorities.
Even if we obtain regulatory approval for nevanimibe, MLE-301 or
future product candidates, we will remain subject to ongoing
regulatory oversight.
Even if we obtain any regulatory approval for nevanimibe, MLE-301
or future product candidates, the approved product will be subject
to ongoing regulatory requirements for manufacturing, labeling,
packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, sampling,
record-keeping and submission of safety and other post-market
information. For example, we must comply with the FDA’s advertising
and promotion requirements, such as those related to
direct-to-consumer advertising and the prohibition on promoting
products for uses or in patient populations that are not described
in the product’s approved labeling. In addition, any regulatory
approvals that we receive for nevanimibe, MLE-301 or future product
candidates may also be subject to REMS limitations on the approved
indicated uses for which the drug may be marketed or to the
conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially
costly post-marketing testing, including Phase 4 clinical trials,
and surveillance to monitor the quality, safety and efficacy of the
drug.
In addition, drug manufacturers and their facilities are subject to
payment of user fees and continual review and periodic inspections
by the FDA and other regulatory authorities for compliance with
cGMP requirements and adherence to commitments made in the NDA or
foreign marketing application. If we, or a regulatory authority,
discover previously unknown problems with a drug, such as adverse
events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the
facility where the drug is manufactured or disagrees with the
promotion, marketing or labeling of that drug, a regulatory
authority may impose restrictions relative to that drug, the
manufacturing facility or us, including requiring recall or
withdrawal of the drug from the market or suspension of
manufacturing.
If we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements
following approval of nevanimibe, MLE-301 or future product
candidates, a regulatory authority may, among other
things:
•issue
a warning letter asserting that we are in violation of the
law;
•seek
an injunction or impose administrative, civil or criminal penalties
or monetary fines;
•suspend
or withdraw regulatory approval;
•suspend
any ongoing clinical trials;
•refuse
to approve a pending NDA or comparable foreign marketing
application (or any supplements thereto) submitted by us or our
strategic partners;
•restrict
the marketing or manufacturing of the drug;
•seize
or detain the drug or otherwise require the withdrawal of the drug
from the market;
•refuse
to permit the import or export of product candidates;
or
•refuse
to allow us to enter into supply contracts, including government
contracts.
Any government investigation of alleged violations of law could
require us to expend significant time and resources in response and
could generate negative publicity. The occurrence of any event or
penalty described above may inhibit our ability to commercialize
nevanimibe or MLE-301, and harm our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
In addition, the FDA’s policies, and those of equivalent foreign
regulatory agencies, may change and additional government
regulations may be enacted that could suspend or restrict
regulatory approval of nevanimibe or MLE-301. We cannot predict the
likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may
arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in
the United States or abroad. If we are slow or unable to adapt to
changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new
requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain
regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we
may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability,
which would harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Even if one of our product candidates receives marketing approval,
it may fail to achieve market acceptance by physicians, patients,
third-party payors or others in the medical community necessary for
commercial success.
Even if one of our product candidates receives marketing approval,
it may fail to gain sufficient market acceptance by physicians,
patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community.
If any such product candidate does not achieve an adequate level of
acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenue and may
not become profitable. The degree of market acceptance of a product
candidate, if approved for commercial sale, will depend on a number
of factors, including but not limited to:
•the
efficacy and potential advantages compared to alternative
treatments;
•the
success of our efforts to educate physicians, patients, third-party
payors and others in the medical community on the benefits of our
products;
•effectiveness
of sales and marketing efforts;
•the
cost of treatment in relation to alternative treatments, including
any similar generic treatments;
•our
ability to offer our drugs, once approved, for sale at competitive
prices;
•the
convenience and ease of administration compared to alternative
treatments;
•the
willingness of the target patient population to try new therapies
and of physicians to prescribe these therapies;
•the
strength of marketing and distribution support;
•the
availability of third-party coverage and adequate reimbursement,
and patients’ willingness to pay out-of-pocket in the absence
third-party coverage or adequate reimbursement;
•the
prevalence and severity of any side effects; and
•any
restrictions on the use of our drugs, once approved, together with
other medications
If the market opportunities for our product candidates are smaller
than we believe they are, our product revenues may be adversely
affected and our business may suffer.
Our efforts to educate physicians, patients, third-party payors and
others in the medical community on the benefits of our products, if
and when approved, may require significant resources and may never
be successful. Further, patient populations suffering from CAH, and
other indications we may target in the future, are small and have
not been established with precision. If the actual number of
patients is smaller than we estimate for any disease that we are
targeting, or if we cannot raise awareness of these diseases and
diagnosis is not improved, our revenue and ability to achieve
profitability may be adversely affected. For example, since the
patient population for CAH is small, the per-patient drug pricing
must be high in order to recover our development and manufacturing
costs, fund adequate patient support programs and achieve
profitability. For CAH, then, we may not maintain or obtain
sufficient sales volume at a price high enough to justify our
product development efforts and our sales and marketing and
manufacturing expenses. Because we expect sales of nevanimibe, if
approved, to generate substantially all of our product revenue for
the foreseeable future, the failure of nevanimibe to find market
acceptance would harm our business.
If we are unable to establish sales, marketing and distribution
capabilities, either on our own or in collaboration with
third-parties, we may not be successful in commercializing our
product candidates, if approved.
We do not have any infrastructure for the sales, marketing or
distribution of our products, and the cost of establishing and
maintaining such an organization may exceed the cost-effectiveness
of doing so. In order to market any product that may be approved,
we must build our sales, distribution, marketing, managerial and
other non-technical capabilities, or make arrangements with
third-parties to perform these services. There can be no assurance
we will be able to do so in a cost-effective manner, on terms
favorable to us, or at all.
While we may seek the aid of global or regional collaborators to
provide additional resources for larger indications or to
co-commercialize our product candidates in the European Union and
certain other territories, we expect to build a focused sales,
distribution and marketing infrastructure to market our product
candidates in the United States itself, if approved. There are
significant expenses and risks involved with establishing our own
sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, including our
ability to hire, retain and appropriately incentivize qualified
individuals, generate sufficient sales leads, provide adequate
training to sales and marketing personnel, and effectively manage a
geographically dispersed sales and marketing team. Any failure or
delay in the development of our internal sales, marketing and
distribution capabilities could delay any product launch, which
would adversely impact its commercialization.
Factors that may inhibit our future efforts to commercialize our
products on our own include:
•our
inability to raise additional capital through equity or debt
financings or through lending and licensing
arrangements;
•our
inability to recruit, train and retain adequate numbers of
effective sales and marketing personnel;
•the
inability of sales personnel to obtain access to educate adequate
numbers of physicians as to the benefits or our drug
products;
•the
inability of reimbursement professionals to negotiate arrangements,
for formulary access, reimbursement, and other acceptance by
payors;
•restricted
or closed distribution channels that make it difficult to
distribute our products to segments of the patient
population;
•the
lack of complementary medicines to be offered by sales personnel,
which may put us at a competitive disadvantage relative to
companies with more extensive product lines; and
•unforeseen
costs and expenses associated with creating an independent sales
and marketing organization.
Further, we do not anticipate having the resources in the
foreseeable future to allocate to the sales and marketing of our
product candidates in certain markets overseas. Therefore, our
future success will depend, in part, on our ability to enter into
and maintain collaborative relationships for such capabilities, the
collaborator’s strategic interest in a product and such
collaborator’s ability to successfully market and sell the product.
We intend to pursue collaborative arrangements regarding the sale
and marketing of our product candidates, if approved, for certain
markets overseas; however, we cannot assure you that we will be
able to establish or maintain such collaborative arrangements, or
if able to do so, that we will have effective sales forces. To the
extent that we depend on third-parties for marketing and
distribution, any revenue we receive will depend upon the efforts
of such third-parties, and there can be no assurance that such
efforts will be successful.
If we are unable to build our own sales force or negotiate a
collaborative relationship for the commercialization of our product
candidates, we may be forced to delay our potential
commercialization or reduce the scope of our sales or marketing
activities for them. If we elect to increase our expenditures to
fund commercialization activities itself, we will need to obtain
additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable
terms, or at all. If we do not have sufficient funds, we will not
be able to bring our product candidates to market or generate
product revenue. We could enter into arrangements with
collaborative partners or otherwise at an earlier stage than
otherwise would be ideal and we may be required to relinquish
rights to our product candidates or otherwise agree to terms
unfavorable to us, any of which may have an adverse effect on our
business and results of operations.
If we are unable to establish adequate sales, marketing and
distribution capabilities, either on our own or in collaboration
with third-parties, we will not be successful in commercializing
our product candidates and may not become profitable. We will be
competing with many companies that currently have extensive and
well-funded sales and marketing operations. Without an internal
team or the support of a third-party to perform sales and marketing
functions, we may be unable to compete successfully against these
more established companies.
Even if we obtain and maintain approval for our current and future
product candidates from the FDA, we may nevertheless be unable to
obtain approval for our product candidates outside of the United
States, which would limit our market opportunities and could harm
our business.
Approval of a product candidate in the United States by the FDA
does not ensure approval of such product candidate by regulatory
authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and approval by
one foreign regulatory authority does not ensure approval by
regulatory authorities in other foreign countries or by the FDA. If
approved, sales of nevanimibe, MLE-301 and any future product
candidate outside of the United States will be subject to foreign
regulatory requirements governing clinical trials and marketing
approval. Even if the FDA grants marketing approval for a product
candidate, comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries
also must approve the manufacturing and marketing of the product
candidate in those countries. Approval procedures vary among
jurisdictions and can involve requirements and administrative
review periods different from, and more onerous than, those in the
United States, including additional preclinical studies or clinical
trials. In many countries outside the United States, a product
candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be
approved for sale in that country. In some cases, the price that we
intend to charge for any product candidates, if approved, is also
subject to approval. Obtaining approval for nevanimibe, MLE-301 or
any future product candidate in the European Union from the
European Commission following the opinion of the EMA, if we choose
to submit a marketing authorization application there, would be a
lengthy and expensive process. Even if a product candidate is
approved, the FDA or the European Commission, as the case may be,
may limit the indications for which the drug may be marketed,
require extensive warnings on the drug labeling or require
expensive and time-consuming additional clinical trials or
reporting as conditions of approval. Obtaining foreign regulatory
approvals and compliance with foreign regulatory requirements could
result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and
could delay or prevent the introduction of nevanimibe, MLE-301 or
any future product candidate in certain countries.
Further, clinical trials conducted in one country may not be
accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries. Also,
regulatory approval for nevanimibe, MLE-301 or any future product
candidate may be withdrawn. If we fail to comply with the
regulatory requirements, our target market will be reduced and our
ability to realize the full market potential of nevanimibe, MLE-301
or any future product candidate will be negatively impacted, and
our business, prospects, financial condition and results of
operations could be harmed.
We are exposed to a variety of risks associated with our
international operations.
Since the closing date of the Merger, we have been engaged in the
process of winding up various subsidiaries of OvaScience, some or
all of which are in foreign jurisdictions. We expect to incur
additional costs to complete this process. Moreover, even if we
successfully wind up these entities, we may be exposed to liability
in these foreign jurisdictions as a result of their historical
operations.
In addition, in December 2017, we acquired Alizé Pharma SAS,
or Alizé, a biopharmaceutical company based in Lyon, France. As of
May 1, 2020, we had 26 employees located in the United States and 3
employees located in France. Our global operations expose us to
numerous and sometimes conflicting legal, tax and regulatory
requirements, and violations or unfavorable interpretation by the
respective authorities of these regulations could harm our
business. Risks associated with international operations include
the following, and these risks may be more pronounced if we seek to
commercialize nevanimibe, MLE-301 or any future product candidates
outside of the United States:
•different
regulatory requirements for approval of therapies in foreign
countries;
•reduced
protection for intellectual property rights;
•unexpected
changes in tariffs, trade barriers and regulatory
requirements;
•economic
weakness, including inflation, or political instability in
particular foreign economies and markets;
•compliance
with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees
living or traveling abroad;
•foreign
currency fluctuations, which could result in increased operating
expenses and reduced revenue, and other obligations incident to
doing business in another country;
•foreign
reimbursement, pricing and insurance regimes;
•workforce
uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in
the United States;
•changes
in diplomatic and trade relationships;
•anti-corruption
laws, including the FCPA, and its equivalent in foreign
jurisdictions, such as the UK Bribery Act;
•production
shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply
or manufacturing capabilities abroad; and
•business
interruptions resulting from pandemics and public health
emergencies, including those related to the COVID-19 pandemic,
geopolitical actions, including war and terrorism or natural
disasters including earthquakes, typhoons, floods and
fires.
In addition, there are complex regulatory, tax, labor, and other
legal requirements imposed by both the European Union and many of
the individual countries in and outside of Europe, with which we
may need to comply. Many biopharmaceutical companies have found the
process of marketing their own products in foreign countries to be
very challenging.
Furthermore, in some countries, the pricing of prescription
pharmaceuticals is subject to governmental control. In these
countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can
take considerable time after the receipt of marketing approval for
a product candidate. In addition, there can be considerable
pressure by governments and other stakeholders on prices and
reimbursement levels, including as part of cost containment
measures. Political, economic and regulatory developments may
further complicate pricing negotiations, and pricing negotiations
may continue after coverage and reimbursement have been obtained.
Reference pricing used by various countries and parallel
distribution or arbitrage between low-priced and high-priced
countries, can further reduce prices. To obtain reimbursement or
pricing approval in some countries, we may be required to conduct a
clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of our product
candidate to other available therapies, which is time-consuming and
costly. If coverage and reimbursement of our product candidates are
unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at
unsatisfactory levels, our business could be harmed.
Legal, political and economic uncertainty surrounding the exit of
the U.K., from the European Union, or EU, may be a source of
instability in international markets, create significant currency
fluctuations, adversely affect our operations in the U.K. and pose
additional risks to our business, revenue, financial condition, and
results of operations.
On June 23, 2016, the U.K. held a referendum in which a
majority of the eligible members of the electorate voted for the
U.K. to leave the EU. The U.K.’s withdrawal from the EU is commonly
referred to as Brexit. The U.K. formally left the EU on January 31,
2020, and is now in a transition period through December 31, 2020.
The lack of clarity over which EU laws and regulations will
continue to be implemented in the U.K. after Brexit (including
financial laws and regulations, tax and free trade agreements,
intellectual property rights, data protection laws, supply chain
logistics, environmental, health and safety laws and regulations,
immigration laws and employment laws) may negatively impact foreign
direct investment in the U.K., increase costs, depress economic
activity and restrict access to capital. The uncertainty concerning
the U.K.’s legal, political and economic relationship with the EU
after Brexit may be a source of instability in the international
markets, create significant currency fluctuations, and/or otherwise
adversely affect trading agreements or similar cross-border
co-operation arrangements (whether economic, tax, fiscal, legal,
regulatory or otherwise) beyond the date of Brexit.
These developments, or the perception that any of them could occur,
have had, and may continue to have, a significant adverse effect on
global economic conditions and the stability of global financial
markets, and could significantly reduce global market liquidity and
limit the ability of key market participants to operate in certain
financial markets. In particular, it could also lead to a period of
considerable uncertainty in relation to the U.K. financial and
banking markets, as well as on the regulatory process in Europe.
Asset valuations, currency exchange rates and credit ratings may
also be subject to increased market volatility. The long-term
effects of Brexit will depend on any agreements (or lack thereof)
between the U.K. and the EU and, in particular, any arrangements
for the U.K. to retain access to EU markets either during a
transitional period or more permanently.
Such a withdrawal from the EU is unprecedented, and it is unclear
how the U.K.’s access to the European single market for goods,
capital, services and labor within the EU, or single market, and
the wider commercial, legal and regulatory environment, will impact
us. We may also face new regulatory costs and challenges that could
have an adverse effect on our operations. Depending on the terms of
the U.K.’s withdrawal from the EU, the U.K. could lose the benefits
of global trade agreements
negotiated by the EU on behalf of its members, which may result in
increased trade barriers that could make our doing business in the
U.K. more difficult. Furthermore, there are likely to be changes to
the way in which marketing approvals are granted in the U.K., which
could add time and expense to the process by which our product
candidates receive and maintain regulatory approval in the U.K. and
across the European Economic Area in future.
Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur
substantial liabilities and could limit commercialization of any
product candidate that we may develop.
We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to
the testing of our current and future product candidates, and may
face an even greater risk if we commercialize any product candidate
that we may develop. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves
against claims that any such product candidates caused injuries, we
could incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or
eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:
•decreased
demand for any product candidate that we may develop;
•loss
of revenue;
•substantial
monetary awards to trial participants or patients;
•significant
time and costs to defend the related litigation;
•withdrawal
of clinical trial participants;
•the
inability to commercialize any product candidate that it may
develop;
•injury
to our reputation and significant negative media attention;
and
•increased
marketing costs to attempt to overcome any injury to our reputation
or negative media attention.
In addition, we face an inherent risk of product liability exposure
related to OvaScience’s prior use of fertility treatments in
humans. Product liability claims involving OvaScience’s activities
may be brought for significant amounts because OvaScience’s
potential fertility treatments involved mothers and children. For
example, it is possible that we will be subject to product
liability claims that assert that OvaScience’s potential fertility
treatments have caused birth defects in children or that such
defects are inheritable. These claims could be made many years
into the future based on effects that were not observed or
observable at the time of birth. If we cannot successfully defend
against claims that OvaScience’s potential fertility treatments
caused injuries, we will incur substantial liabilities. Regardless
of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in, among
other things, significant costs to defend the related litigation;
substantial monetary awards or payments to trial participants or
patients; loss of revenue; and the diversion of management’s
resources.
Although we maintain product liability insurance coverage, such
insurance may not be adequate to cover all liabilities that we may
incur. We anticipate that we will need to increase our insurance
coverage each time we commence a clinical trial and if we
successfully commercialize any product candidate. Insurance
coverage is increasingly expensive. We may not be able to maintain
insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in an amount adequate to
satisfy any liability that may arise.
If OvaScience failed to comply with environmental, health and
safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or
penalties or incur costs that could have a material adverse effect
on the success of our business.
OvaScience is subject to numerous environmental, health and safety
laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory
procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment and disposal
of hazardous materials and wastes. OvaScience’s prior operations
involved the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including
chemicals and biological materials. OvaScience’s prior operations
also produced hazardous waste products. OvaScience generally
contracted with third-parties for the disposal of these materials
and wastes. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from
OvaScience’s use of hazardous materials, we could be held liable
for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our
resources. We also could incur significant costs associated with
civil or criminal fines and penalties.
We do not maintain insurance for environmental liability or toxic
tort claims that may be asserted against us in connection with
OvaScience’s storage or disposal of biological, hazardous or
radioactive materials.
Risks Related to Regulatory Compliance
Our current and future relationships with investigators, health
care professionals, consultants, third-party payors and customers
may be subject, directly or indirectly, to federal and state
healthcare fraud and abuse laws, false claims laws, health
information privacy and security laws, and other healthcare laws
and regulations. If we are unable to comply, or have not fully
complied, with such laws, we could face substantial
penalties.
Our operations may be directly, or indirectly through our
prescribers, customers and purchasers, subject to various federal
and state fraud and abuse laws and regulations, including, without
limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal civil
and criminal false claims laws and Physician Payments Sunshine Act
and regulations. These laws may constrain our current and future
business or financial arrangements and relationships through which
we conduct our operations, including how we research, market, sell
and distribute our products for which we obtain marketing approval.
In addition, we may be subject to patient privacy laws by both the
federal government and the states and other countries in which we
conduct our business. The laws that will affect our operations
include, but are not limited to:
•the
federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things,
persons or entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting,
receiving, offering or paying any remuneration (including any
kickback, bribe or rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or
covertly, in cash or in kind, in return for the purchase,
recommendation, leasing or furnishing of an item or service
reimbursable under a federal healthcare program, such as the
Medicare and Medicaid programs. This statute has been interpreted
to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on
the one hand, and prescribers, purchasers, formulary managers, and
others on the other hand. In addition, the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act, or collectively PPACA, amended the intent
requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, establishing that
a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this
statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed
a violation;
•federal
civil and criminal false claims laws, including the federal civil
False Claims Act, and civil monetary penalty laws which prohibit,
among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly
presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment or
approval from Medicare, Medicaid or other government payors that
are false or fraudulent. PPACA provides, and recent government
cases against pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers
support the view, that federal Anti-Kickback Statute violations and
certain marketing practices, including off-label promotion, may
implicate the federal civil False Claims Act;
•the
federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of
1996, or HIPAA, which created additional federal civil and criminal
statutes that prohibit a person from knowingly and willfully
executing a scheme or from making false or fraudulent statements to
defraud any healthcare benefit program, regardless of the payor
(e.g., public or private);
•HIPAA,
as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and
Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, and their implementing regulations,
which imposes certain requirements relating to the privacy,
security and transmission of individually identifiable health
information without appropriate authorization by entities subject
to the rule, such as health plans, health care clearinghouses and
certain health care providers, known as covered entities, and their
business associates who create, use or disclose individually
identifiable health information on their behalf;
•federal
transparency laws, including the federal Physician Payments
Sunshine Act, that require certain manufacturers of drugs, devices,
biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under
Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, with
specific exceptions, to report annually to CMS information related
to: (i) payments or other “transfers of value” made to
physicians, as defined by such law, and teaching hospitals and
(ii) ownership and investment interests held by physicians and
their immediate family members;
•state
and foreign law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such
as state anti-kickback, self-referral, and false claims laws which
may apply to our business practices, including but not limited to,
research, distribution, sales and marketing arrangements as well as
submitting claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed
by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers; state laws
that require pharmaceutical manufacturers to comply with the
industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the applicable
compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government that
otherwise restricts payments that may be made to healthcare
providers; state laws that require pharmaceutical manufacturers to
file reports with states regarding marketing information, such as
the tracking and reporting of gifts, compensation and other
remuneration and items of value provided to healthcare
professionals and entities; state laws that require the reporting
of information related to drug pricing; and state and local laws
requiring the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives;
and
•state
and foreign laws that govern the privacy and security of health
information in some circumstances, many of which differ from each
other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA,
thus complicating compliance efforts.
Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third-parties
will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will
involve substantial costs. However, because of the breadth of these
laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and regulatory
safe harbors available, it is possible that some of our business
activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such
laws. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the
laws described above or any other government regulations that apply
to us, we may be subject to penalties, including significant
administrative, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines,
additional reporting requirements and oversight if we become
subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to
resolve allegations of noncompliance with these laws, exclusion
from participation in government health care programs, such as
Medicare and Medicaid, disgorgement, contractual damages,
reputational harm and the curtailment or restructuring of our
operations, any of which could harm our ability to operate our
business and our results of operations. Similar sanctions and
penalties, as well as imprisonment, also can be imposed upon
executive officers and employees, including criminal sanctions
against executive officers under the so-called “responsible
corporate officer” doctrine, even in situations where the executive
officer did not intend to violate the law and was unaware of any
wrongdoing.
The risk of us being found in violation of these laws is increased
by the fact that many of them have not been fully interpreted by
the regulatory authorities or the courts, and its provisions are
open to a variety of interpretations. Any action against us for
violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it,
could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our
management’s attention from the operation of our business. The
shifting compliance environment and the need to build and maintain
a robust and expandable system to comply with multiple
jurisdictions with different compliance and/or reporting
requirements increases the possibility that a healthcare company
such as we may run afoul of one or more of the
requirements.
Coverage and adequate reimbursement may not be available for our
current or future product candidates, which could make it difficult
for us to sell them profitably, if approved.
Market acceptance and sales of any product candidates that we
commercialize, if approved, will depend in part on the extent to
which coverage and reimbursement for these drugs and related
treatments will be available from third-party payors, including
government health administration authorities and private health
insurers. Third-party payors often rely upon Medicare coverage
policy and payment limitations in setting their own coverage and
reimbursement policies. However, decisions regarding the extent of
coverage and amount of reimbursement to be provided for any product
candidates that we develop will be made on a plan-by-plan basis. As
a result, the coverage determination process is often a
time-consuming and costly process that may require us to provide
scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to each
payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate
reimbursement will be applied consistently or obtained. One payor’s
determination to provide coverage for a drug does not assure that
other payors will also provide coverage, and adequate
reimbursement, for the drug. Additionally, a third-party payor’s
decision to provide coverage for a therapy does not imply that an
adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Each plan determines
whether it will provide coverage for a therapy, what amount it will
pay the manufacturer for the therapy, and on what tier of its
formulary it will be placed. The position on a formulary generally
determines the co-payment that a patient will need to make to
obtain the therapy and can strongly influence the adoption of such
therapy by patients and physicians. Patients who are prescribed
treatments for their conditions and providers prescribing such
services generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or
part of the associated healthcare costs. Patients are unlikely to
use our drugs unless coverage is provided and reimbursement is
adequate to cover a significant portion of the cost of our
drugs.
A primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry and elsewhere is
cost containment. Third-party payors have attempted to control
costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for
particular medications. We cannot be sure that coverage and
reimbursement will be available for any drug that we commercialize
and, if reimbursement is available, what the level of reimbursement
will be. Inadequate coverage and reimbursement may impact the
demand for, or the price of, any drug for which we obtain marketing
approval. If coverage and reimbursement are not available, or are
available only to limited levels, we may not be able to
successfully commercialize nevanimibe, MLE-301 and any future
product candidates that we develop.
Additionally, there have been a number of legislative and
regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system in the United
States and in some foreign jurisdictions that could affect our
ability to sell any future product candidates profitably. These
legislative and regulatory changes may negatively impact the
coverage and available reimbursement for nevanimibe, MLE-301 and
any future product candidates we may commercialize, following
approval, if obtained.
Healthcare legislative reform measures may have a negative impact
on our business and results of operations.
In the United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have
been, and continue to be, several legislative and regulatory
changes and proposed changes regarding the healthcare system that
could prevent or delay marketing approval of product candidates,
restrict or regulate post-approval activities, and affect our
ability to profitably sell any product candidates for which we
obtain marketing approval.
In March 2010, PPACA was passed, which substantially changed the
way healthcare is financed by both the government and private
insurers, and significantly impacts the U.S. pharmaceutical
industry. PPACA, among other things: (i) addressed a new
methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the
Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are
inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected; (ii) increased
the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by manufacturers under the
Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and extends the rebate program to
individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations; (iii)
established annual fees and taxes on manufacturers of certain
branded prescription drugs; (iv) expanded the availability of lower
pricing under the 340B drug pricing program by adding new entities
to the program; and (v) established a new Medicare Part D coverage
gap discount program, in which manufacturers must, as of January 1,
2019, agree to offer 70% point-of-sale discounts off negotiated
prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during
their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s
outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D.
There remain judicial and Congressional challenges to certain
aspects of PPACA, as well as efforts by the Trump administration to
repeal or replace certain aspects of PPACA. Since January 2017,
President Trump has signed two Executive Orders and other
directives designed to delay the implementation of certain
provisions of PPACA or otherwise circumvent some of the
requirements for health insurance mandated by PPACA. Concurrently,
Congress has considered legislation that would repeal or repeal and
replace all or part of PPACA. While Congress has not passed
comprehensive repeal legislation, several bills affecting the
implementation of certain taxes under PPACA have been signed into
law. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or Tax Act, included a
provision which repealed, effective January 1, 2019, the tax-based
shared responsibility payment imposed by PPACA on certain
individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all
or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual
mandate”. Additionally, the 2020 federal spending package
permanently eliminated, effective January 1, 2020, the
PPACA-mandated “Cadillac” tax on high-cost employer-sponsored
health coverage and medical device tax and, effective January 1,
2021, also eliminates the health insurer tax. Further, the
Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, among other things, amended the
PPACA, effective January 1, 2019, to increase from 50 percent to 70
percent the point-of-sale discount that is owed by pharmaceutical
manufacturers who participate in Medicare Part D and to close the
coverage gap in most Medicare drug plans, commonly referred to as
the “donut hole.” In December 2018 CMS published a new final rule
permitting further collections and payments to and from certain
PPACA qualified health plans and health insurance issuers under the
PPACA risk adjustment program. On April 27, 2020, the United States
Supreme Court reversed a Federal Circuit decision that previously
upheld Congress' denial of $12 billion in "risk corridor" funding.
On December 14, 2018, a Texas U.S. District Court Judge ruled that
the PPACA is unconstitutional in its entirety because the
“individual mandate” was repealed by Congress as part of the Tax
Act. Additionally, on December 18, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the 5th Circuit upheld the District Court ruling that the
individual mandate was unconstitutional and remanded the case back
to the District Court to determine whether the remaining provisions
of the PPACA are invalid as well. On March 2, 2020, the United
States Supreme Court granted the petitions for writs of certiorari
to review this case and has allotted one hour for oral arguments.
It is unclear when such oral arguments are to be held and when a
decision is expected to be made. It is also unclear how such
litigation and other efforts to repeal and replace the PPACA will
impact the PPACA. We continue to evaluate the potential impact of
PPACA and its possible repeal or replacement on our
business.
We expect that PPACA, as well as other healthcare reform measures
that may be adopted in the future, may result in more rigorous
coverage criteria and in additional downward pressure on the price
that we are able to charge for any approved drug in the United
States. For example, there have been several recent U.S.
Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state
legislation designed to, among other things, bring more
transparency to drug pricing, review the relationship between
pricing and manufacturer patient programs, reduce the cost of drugs
under Medicare, and reform government program reimbursement
methodologies for drugs. At the federal level, the Trump
administration’s budget proposal for fiscal year 2021 includes a
$135 billion allowance to support legislative proposals seeking to
reduce drug prices, increase competition, lower out-of-pocket drug
costs for patients, and increase patient access to lower-cost
generic and biosimilar drugs. On March 10, 2020, the Trump
administration sent “principles” for drug pricing to Congress,
calling for legislation that would, among other things, cap
Medicare Part D beneficiary out-of-pocket pharmacy expenses,
provide an option to cap Medicare Part D beneficiary monthly
out-of-pocket expenses, and place limits on pharmaceutical price
increases.
Moreover, the Trump administration previously released a
“Blueprint” to lower drug prices and reduce out of pocket costs of
drugs that contains additional proposals to increase drug
manufacturer competition, increase the negotiating power of certain
federal healthcare programs, incentivize manufacturers to lower the
list price of their products, and reduce the out of pocket costs of
drug products
paid by consumers. The Department of Health and Human Services, or
HHS, has solicited feedback on some of these measures and has
implemented others under its existing authority. For example, in
May 2019, CMS issued a final rule to allow Medicare Advantage Plans
the option of using step therapy for Part B drugs beginning on
January 1, 2020. The final rule codified a CMS policy change that
was effective January 1, 2019. Congress and the Trump
administration have each indicated that it will continue to seek
new legislative and/or administrative measures to control drug
costs. At the state level, legislatures are increasingly passing
legislation and implementing regulations designed to control
pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or
patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on
certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and
transparency measures, and, in some cases, such measures are
designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk
purchasing. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other
government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments
from private payors. The implementation of cost containment
measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able
to generate revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize our
drugs. We expect that additional state and federal healthcare
reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could
limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for
healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced
demand for our product candidates or additional pricing
pressures.
In addition, other legislative changes have been adopted since
PPACA was enacted. These changes include aggregate reductions in
Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which went
into effect on April 1, 2013 and, following passage of the
Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, among other legislative amendments,
will remain in effect through 2030 unless additional Congressional
action is taken. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security
Act, or CARES Act, which was signed into law in March 2020 and is
designed to provide financial support and resources to individuals
and businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, suspended the 2%
Medicare sequester from May 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, and
extended the sequester by one year, through 2030.
The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, among other things,
further reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers and
increased the statute of limitations period for the government to
recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. These
new laws may result in additional reductions in Medicare and other
healthcare funding, which could have a material adverse effect on
our customers and, accordingly, our financial
operations.
Additional changes that may affect our business include those
governing enrollment in federal healthcare programs, reimbursement
changes, rules regarding prescription drug benefits under the
health insurance exchanges and fraud and abuse and enforcement.
Continued implementation of PPACA and the passage of additional
laws and regulations may result in the expansion of new programs
such as Medicare payment for performance initiatives, and may
impact existing government healthcare programs, such as by
improving the physician quality reporting system and feedback
program. For each state that does not choose to expand its Medicaid
program, there likely will be fewer insured patients overall, which
could impact the sales, business and financial condition of
manufacturers of branded prescription drugs. Where patients receive
insurance coverage under any of the new options made available
through PPACA, the possibility exists that manufacturers may be
required to pay Medicaid rebates on their resulting drug
utilization, a decision that could impact manufacturer
revenues.
Further, it is possible that additional governmental action may be
taken to address the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, on April 18,
2020, CMS announced that Qualified Health Plan issuers under the
PPACA may suspend activities related to the collection and
reporting of quality data that would have otherwise been reported
between May and June 2020 given the challenges healthcare providers
are facing responding to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Regulatory, legislative or self-regulatory/standard developments
regarding privacy and data security matters could adversely affect
our ability to conduct our business.
We are subject to and affected by laws, rules, regulations and
industry standards related to data privacy and security, and
restrictions or technological requirements regarding the
collection, use, storage, security, retention or transfer of data.
In the United States, the rules and regulations to which we
may be subject include federal laws and regulations enforced by the
Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Health & Human
Services, and state privacy, data security, and breach notification
laws, as well as regulator enforcement positions and expectations.
Internationally, governments and agencies have adopted and could in
the future adopt, modify, apply or enforce additional laws,
policies, regulations, and standards covering privacy and data
security that may apply to our business. New regulation or
legislative actions regarding data privacy and security (together
with applicable industry standards) may increase our costs of doing
business. In addition to privacy and data security regulations
currently in force in the jurisdictions where we operate, the
European Union General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, went
into effect in May 2018. The GDPR contains numerous
requirements and changes from existing European Union, or EU, law,
including more robust obligations on data processors and data
controllers and heavier documentation requirements for data
protection compliance programs. Specifically, the GDPR will
introduce numerous privacy-related changes for companies operating
in the EU, including greater control over personal data-by-data
subjects (e.g.,
the “right to be forgotten”), increased data portability for EU
consumers, data breach notification requirements, and increased
fines. In particular, under the GDPR, fines of up to €20 million or
up to 4% of the annual global revenue of the noncompliant company,
whichever is greater, could be imposed for violations of certain of
the GDPR’s requirements. The GDPR requirements apply not only to
third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information
between us and our subsidiaries, including employee information.
However, despite our ongoing efforts to bring our practices into
compliance before the effective date of the GDPR, we may not be
successful either due to various factors within our control, such
as limited financial or human resources, or other factors outside
our control. It is also possible that local data protection
authorities may have different interpretations of the GDPR, leading
to potential inconsistencies amongst various EU member states. Any
failure or alleged failure (including as a result of deficiencies
in our policies, procedures, or measures relating to privacy, data
security, marketing, or communications) by us to comply with laws,
regulations, policies, legal or contractual obligations, industry
standards, or regulatory guidance relating to privacy or data
security, may result in governmental investigations and enforcement
actions, litigation, fines and penalties, additional regulatory
oversight and reporting obligations or adverse publicity. Further,
because of the work-from-home policies we implemented due to
COVID-19, information that is normally protected, including company
confidential information, may be less secure.
We expect that there will continue to be new proposed laws,
regulations and industry standards relating to privacy and data
protection in the United States, the European Union, and in other
jurisdictions, and we cannot determine the impact such future laws,
regulations and standards may have on our business. Future laws,
regulations, standards and other obligations or any changed
interpretation of existing laws or regulations could impair our
ability to operate our business and negatively impact our results
of operations.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
We rely on the availability of licenses for intellectual property
from third-parties and these licenses may not be available to us on
commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
We rely upon the UM License Agreement to certain patent rights and
proprietary technology from the University of Michigan that are
important or necessary to the development of nevanimibe. We rely
upon the Roche License Agreement to certain patent rights and
proprietary technology from Roche that are important or necessary
to the development of MLE-301. As of March 31, 2020, with respect
to nevanimibe patent rights, we owned two issued U.S. patents, two
pending U.S. patent applications, and a number of patent
applications in other jurisdictions, and we jointly owned, with the
University of Michigan, three issued U.S. patents, one pending U.S.
patent application, and a number of patent applications in other
jurisdictions. In addition, as of March 31, 2020, with respect to
MLE-301 patent rights, we owned one pending U.S. patent
application, and we exclusively licensed from Roche one issued U.S.
patent and a number of patents and pending patent applications in
other jurisdictions. There is no guarantee that any of the
foregoing patent applications will result in issued patents, or
that any current patents or patent applications, if issued, will
include claims that are sufficiently broad to cover our product
candidates or future products, or to provide meaningful protection
from our competitors in all territories in which we may wish to
develop or commercialize our products in the future. We will be
able to protect our proprietary rights from unauthorized use by
third-parties only to the extent they are covered by valid and
enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets
within our organization. If third-parties disclose or
misappropriate our proprietary rights, it may have a material
adverse effect on our business.
The licenses granted under the UM License Agreement and Roche
License Agreement, respectively, are revocable under certain
circumstances including if we cease to do business, fail to make
the payments due thereunder, commit a material breach of the
agreement that is not cured within a certain time period after
receiving written notice or fail to meet certain specified
development and commercial timelines. In such an event, our ability
to compete in the market for a particular drug indication may be
diminished. Termination of the UM License Agreement or Roche
License Agreement may result in us having to negotiate a new or
reinstated agreement, which may not be available to us on equally
favorable terms, or at all, which may mean we are unable to develop
or commercialize nevanimibe or MLE-301, as applicable.
Additionally, the UM License Agreement, Roche License Agreement and
other licenses we may enter into in the future may not provide
exclusive rights to use such intellectual property and technology
at all, in all relevant fields of use and/or in all territories in
which we may wish to develop or commercialize our product
candidates in the future. As a result, we may not be able to
prevent competitors from developing and commercializing competitive
products, including in territories included in the UM License
Agreement and Roche License Agreement.
Licenses to additional third-party patents and materials that may
be required for our development programs may not be available in
the future or may not be available on commercially reasonable
terms, or at all, which could harm our business and financial
condition.
Our intellectual property licenses and agreements with
third-parties may be subject to disagreements over contract
interpretation, which could narrow the scope of our rights to the
relevant intellectual property or technology or increase our
financial or other obligations to our licensors.
We currently depend, and will continue to depend, on the UM License
Agreement. In addition, we currently depend, and will continue to
depend, on the Roche License Agreement. If Roche terminates the
Roche License Agreement due to a breach of any of our material
obligations under the Roche License Agreement or due to our
insolvency, or if we terminate the Roche License Agreement without
cause, the rights and licenses granted by Roche to us under the
Roche License Agreement will terminate on the effective date of the
termination. In such event, if Roche provides us with timely
notice, and to the extent reasonably requested by Roche, we must
transfer to Roche all regulatory filings and approvals, all final
preclinical, non-clinical and clinical study reports and clinical
study protocols, trademarks, and all data, including clinical data,
materials and information, in our possession and control related to
MLE-301 necessary or reasonably useful for Roche to continue to
develop and commercialize MLE-301. Further, if the effective date
of such a termination is after the first commercial sale of the
first MLE-301 product, Roche shall have a worldwide, non-exclusive,
sublicensable, transferable license to research, develop,
manufacture, and sell MLE-301 compounds and products. In such
event, Roche would pay to us royalty fees with respect to the sale
of those compounds and products. Further development and
commercialization of nevanimibe and MLE-301 may, and development of
any future product candidates may, require us to enter into
additional license, assignment or collaboration agreements. The
agreements under which we currently hold or license intellectual
property or technology from third-parties are complex, and certain
provisions in such agreements may be susceptible to multiple
interpretations. The resolution of any contract interpretation
disagreement that may arise could narrow what we believe to be the
scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property or
technology, or increase what we believe to be our financial or
other obligations under the relevant agreement, either of which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects.
If any of our current or future licenses or agreements or material
relationships or any in-licenses upon which our current or future
licenses and intellectual property are based are terminated or
breached, we may:
•lose
our rights to develop and market our current and any future product
candidates;
•lose
our rights to patent protection for our current or any future
product candidates;
•experience
significant delays in the development or commercialization of our
current or any future product candidates;
•not
be able to obtain any other licenses on acceptable terms, if at
all; or
•incur
liability for damages.
These risks apply to any agreements that we may enter into in the
future for nevanimibe, MLE-301 or for any future product
candidates. If we experience any of the foregoing, it would have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
If we fail to comply with our obligations in the agreements under
which we hold or license intellectual property rights from
third-parties or otherwise experience disruptions to our business
relationships with our licensors, we could lose license and
intellectual property rights that are important to our
business.
Further, we cannot provide any assurances that third-party patents
or other intellectual property rights do not exist, which might be
enforced against our current product candidates, resulting in
either an injunction prohibiting our manufacture or sales, or, with
respect to our sales, an obligation on our part to pay royalties
and/or other forms of compensation to third-parties. Moreover, if
disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent
or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing
arrangements on commercially acceptable terms, we may be unable to
successfully develop and commercialize the affected product
candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, prospects, financial condition and results of
operations.
If we are unable to obtain and maintain patent protection for our
technology and products, or if the scope of the patent protection
obtained is not sufficiently broad, we may not be able to compete
effectively in our markets.
We rely upon a combination of patents, trade secret protection and
confidentiality agreements to protect the intellectual property
related to our product candidates. Our success depends in large
part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection in the
United States and other countries with respect to our current and
future product candidates in the United States and other countries
in which we plan to develop and commercialize such product
candidates. We seek to protect our proprietary
position by filing patent applications in the United States and
abroad related to our development programs and product candidates.
The patent prosecution process is expensive and time-consuming, and
we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable
patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely
manner.
Pursuant to the UM License Agreement, we obtained an exclusive,
worldwide license to develop, manufacture and commercialize
nevanimibe. However, the UM License Agreement permits the
University of Michigan, and other non-profit research institutions
which are granted such rights from the University of Michigan, to
manufacture and research nevanimibe for internal research, public
service and internal educational purposes, all of which could
result in new patentable inventions concerning the manufacture or
use of nevanimibe. In addition, pursuant to the Roche License
Agreement, we obtained an exclusive, worldwide license to develop,
manufacture and commercialize MLE-301. However, the Roche License
Agreement permits Roche to use MLE-301 for internal research
purposes, which could result in new patentable inventions
concerning the manufacture or use of MLE-301.
It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable
aspects of our research and development output before it is too
late to obtain patent protection. The patent applications that we
own or in-license may fail to result in issued patents with claims
that cover our current and future product candidates in the United
States or in other foreign countries. There is no assurance that
all of the potentially relevant prior art relating to our patents
and patent applications has been found, which can invalidate a
patent or prevent a patent from issuing from a pending patent
application. Even if patents do successfully issue and even if such
patents cover our current and future product candidates,
third-parties may challenge their validity, enforceability or
scope, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated
or held unenforceable. Any successful opposition to these patents
or any other patents owned by or licensed to us could deprive us of
rights necessary for the successful commercialization of any
product candidates that we may develop. Further, if we encounter
delays in regulatory approvals, the period of time during which we
could market a product candidate and companion diagnostic under
patent protection could be reduced.
If the patent applications we hold or have in-licensed with respect
to our development programs and product candidates fail to issue,
if their breadth or strength of protection is threatened, or if
they fail to provide meaningful exclusivity for our current and
future product candidates, it could dissuade companies from
collaborating with us to develop product candidates, and threaten
our ability to commercialize future drugs. Any such outcome could
have a material adverse effect on our business.
The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies
generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal and factual
questions and has in recent years been the subject of much
litigation. In addition, the laws of foreign countries may not
protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the United
States, or vice versa. For example, European patent law restricts
the patentability of methods of treatment of the human body more
than United States law does. Further, we may not be aware of all
third-party intellectual property rights potentially relating to
our product candidates. Publications of discoveries in scientific
literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent
applications in the United States and other jurisdictions are
typically published 18 months after filing, or in some cases,
not at all. Therefore, we cannot know with certainty whether we
were the first to make the inventions claimed in our owned or
licensed patents or pending patent applications, or that we were
the first to file for patent protection of such inventions. As a
result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and
commercial value of our patent rights are highly uncertain. Our
pending and future patent applications may not result in patents
being issued which protect our technology or product candidates, in
whole or in part, or which effectively prevent others from
commercializing competitive technologies and drugs. Changes in
either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the
United States and other countries may diminish the value of our
patents or narrow the scope of our patent protection.
Recent patent reform legislation could increase the uncertainties
and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications
and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents. On
September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the
"Leahy-Smith Act"), was signed into law. The Leahy-Smith Act
includes a number of significant changes to United States patent
law. These include provisions that affect the way patent
applications are prosecuted and may also affect patent litigation.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, recently
developed new regulations and procedures to govern administration
of the Leahy-Smith Act, and many of the substantive changes to
patent law associated with the Leahy-Smith Act, and in particular,
the first to file provisions, only became effective on
March 16, 2013. Accordingly, it is not clear what, if any,
impact the Leahy-Smith Act will have on the operation of our
business. However, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could
increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of
our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our
issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect
on our business and financial condition. Any further changes in
either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the
United States and other countries may diminish the value of our
patents and patent applications or narrow the scope of our
potential patent protection.
Moreover, we may be subject to a third-party pre-issuance
submission of prior art to the USPTO or become involved in
opposition, derivation, reexamination, inter partes review,
post-grant review or interference proceedings challenging our
patent rights or the patent rights of others. An adverse
determination in any such submission, proceeding or litigation
could reduce the
scope of, or invalidate, our patent rights, allow third-parties to
commercialize our technology or product candidates and compete
directly with us, without payment to us, or result in our inability
to manufacture or commercialize product candidates without
infringing third-party patent rights. In addition, if the breadth
or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent
applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from
collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current
or future product candidates.
The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship,
scope, validity or enforceability, and our owned and licensed
patents may be challenged in the courts or patent offices in the
United States and abroad. Such challenges may result in loss of
exclusivity or freedom to operate or in patent claims being
narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable, in whole or in part,
which could limit our ability to stop others from using or
commercializing similar or identical technology and product
candidates, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our
technology and product candidates. Moreover, patents have a limited
lifespan. In the United States, the natural expiration of a patent
is generally 20 years from the earliest filing date of a
non-provisional patent application. Various extensions may be
available; however, the life of a patent, and the protection it
affords, is limited. Without patent protection for our current or
future product candidates, we may be open to competition from
generic versions of such drugs. Given the amount of time required
for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product
candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before
or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result,
we owned and licensed patent portfolio may not provide it with
sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing drugs
similar or identical to that of us.
We jointly own patents and patent applications with third-parties.
Our ability to exploit or enforce these patent rights, or to
prevent the third-party from granting licenses to others with
respect to these patent rights, may be limited in some
circumstances.
We jointly own certain patents and patent applications with
third-parties. In the absence of an agreement with each co-owner of
jointly owned patent rights, we will be subject to default
rules pertaining to joint ownership. Some countries require
the consent of all joint owners to exploit, license or assign
jointly owned patents, and if we are unable to obtain that consent
from the joint owners, we may be unable to exploit the invention or
to license or assign our rights under these patents and patent
applications in those countries. For example, we secured exclusive
rights from the University of Michigan for certain patents and
patent applications that they jointly own with us related to
nevanimibe. Additionally, in the United States, each co-owner may
be required to be joined as a party to any claim or action we may
wish to bring to enforce these patent rights, which may limit our
ability to pursue third-party infringement claims.
We have in-licensed patents and patent applications from
third-parties. Our ability to exploit or enforce these patent
rights, or to prevent the third-party from granting licenses to
others with respect to these patent rights, may be limited in some
circumstances.
We have in-licensed certain patents and patent applications from
third-parties. In the absence of an agreement with each patent
rights owner, we will be subject to default rules pertaining to
ownership. Some countries require the consent of all owners to
exploit, license or assign owned patents, and if we are unable to
obtain that consent from the owners, we may be unable to exploit
the invention or to license or assign our rights under these
patents and patent applications in those countries. For example, we
secured exclusive rights from Roche for certain patents and patent
applications that they own related to MLE-301. Additionally, in the
United States, each owner may be required to be joined as a party
to any claim or action we may wish to bring to enforce these patent
rights, which may limit our ability to pursue third-party
infringement claims.
Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on
compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee
payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent
agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated
for non-compliance with these requirements.
Periodic maintenance fees, renewal fees, annuity fees and various
other government fees on patents and/or applications will be due to
be paid to the USPTO and various government patent agencies outside
of the United States in several stages over the lifetime of our
owned and licensed patents and/or applications and any patent
rights it may own or license in the future. We rely on our outside
counsel or our licensing partners to pay these fees due to non-U.S.
patent agencies. The USPTO and various non-U.S. government patent
agencies require compliance with several procedural, documentary,
fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent
application process. We employ reputable law firms and other
professionals to help us comply and we are also dependent on our
licensors to take the necessary action to comply with these
requirements with respect to our licensed intellectual property. In
many cases, an inadvertent lapse can be cured by payment of a late
fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable
rules.
There are situations, however, in which non-compliance can result
in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application,
resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the
relevant jurisdiction.
In such an event, potential competitors might be able to enter the
market and this circumstance would have a material adverse effect
on our business.
Patent terms may be inadequate to protect our competitive position
on our product candidates for an adequate amount of
time.
Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and
regulatory review of new product candidates such as nevanimibe and
MLE-301, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or
shortly after such candidates are commercialized. We expect to seek
extensions of patent terms in the United States and, if available,
in other countries where we are prosecuting patents. In the United
States, the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act
of 1984 permits extension of the term of one U.S. patent that
includes at least one claim covering the composition of matter of
an FDA-approved drug, an FDA-approved method of treatment using the
drug. The extended patent term cannot exceed the shorter of
five years beyond the non-extended expiration of the patent or
14 years from the date of the FDA approval of the drug.
However, the applicable authorities, including the FDA and the
USPTO in the United States, and any equivalent regulatory authority
in other countries, may not agree with our assessment of whether
such extensions are available, and may refuse to grant extensions
to our patents, or may grant more limited extensions than we
request. Further, we may not elect to extend the most beneficial
patent to us or the claims underlying the patent that we choose to
extend could be invalidated. If any of the foregoing occurs, our
competitors may be able to take advantage of our investment in
development and clinical trials by referencing its clinical and
preclinical data and launch their drug earlier than might otherwise
be the case.
Intellectual property rights do not necessarily address all
potential threats to our business.
The degree of future protection afforded by our intellectual
property rights is uncertain because intellectual property rights
have limitations and may not adequately protect our business. The
following examples are illustrative:
•others
may be able to make compounds, nevanimibe or MLE-301 formulations
that are similar to our nevanimibe or MLE-301 formulations but that
are not covered by the claims of the patents that we own or
control;
•we
or any strategic partners might not have been the first to make the
inventions covered by the issued patents or pending patent
applications that we own or control;
•we
might not have been the first to file patent applications covering
certain of our inventions;
•others
may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or
duplicate any of our technologies without infringing our
intellectual property rights;
•it
is possible that our pending patent applications will not lead to
issued patents;
•issued
patents that we own or control may not provide us with any
competitive advantages, or may be held invalid or unenforceable as
a result of legal challenges;
•our
competitors might conduct research and development activities in
the United States and other countries that provide a safe harbor
from patent infringement claims for certain research and
development activities, as well as in countries where we do not
have patent rights and then use the information learned from such
activities to develop competitive drugs for sale in our major
commercial markets;
•we
may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are
patentable; and
•the
patents of others may have an adverse effect on our
business.
We do not have broad composition of matter patent protection with
respect to nevanimibe.
We own certain patents and patent applications with claims directed
to a form of nevanimibe and to specific methods of using nevanimibe
and we expect to have marketing exclusivity from the FDA and EMA
for a period of seven and ten years, respectively, because
nevanimibe has not been approved in these markets. However, we do
not have composition of matter protection in the United States and
elsewhere broadly covering nevanimibe. We may be limited in our
ability to list our patents
in the FDA’s Orange Book if the form of the compound used is
materially different from what is claimed in our patents, or if the
use of its product, consistent with its FDA-approved label, would
not fall within the scope of our patent claims. Also, our
competitors may be able to offer and sell products so long as these
competitors do not infringe any other patents that we (or
third-parties) hold, including patents with claims directed to the
forms and manufacture of nevanimibe and/or method of use patents.
In general, patents covering certain forms of a compound and method
of use patents are more difficult to enforce than broad composition
of matter patents because, for example, of the risks that the FDA
may approve different forms of subject compounds or alternative
uses of the subject compounds not covered by the method of use
patents, and others may engage in off-label sale or use of the
subject compounds. Physicians are permitted to prescribe an
approved product for uses that are not described in the product’s
labeling. Although off-label prescriptions may infringe its method
of use patents, the practice is common across medical specialties
and such infringement is difficult to prevent or prosecute. FDA
approval of uses that are not covered by our patents would limit
our ability to generate revenue from the sale of nevanimibe, if
approved for commercial sale. Off-label sales would limit our
ability to generate revenue from the sale of nevanimibe, if
approved for commercial sale.
Third-parties may initiate legal proceedings, which are expensive
and time consuming, alleging that we are infringing their
intellectual property rights, the outcome of which would be
uncertain and could have a material adverse impact on the success
of our business.
Our commercial success depends, in part, upon our ability, and the
ability of our future collaborators, to develop, manufacture,
market and sell nevanimibe, MLE-301 and any future product
candidates and use our proprietary technologies without infringing
the proprietary rights and intellectual property of third-parties.
The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized
by extensive and complex litigation regarding patents and other
intellectual property rights. We may in the future become party to,
or be threatened with, adversarial proceedings or litigation
regarding intellectual property rights with respect to nevanimibe,
MLE-301 and any future product candidates and technology, including
interference proceedings, post grant review and inter partes review
before the USPTO. Third-parties may assert infringement claims
against us based on existing patents or patents that may be granted
in the future, regardless of their merit. There is a risk that
third-parties may choose to engage in litigation with us to enforce
or to otherwise assert their patent rights against us. Even if we
believe such claims are without merit, a court of competent
jurisdiction could hold that these third-party patents are valid,
enforceable and infringed, which could have a material adverse
effect on our ability to commercialize nevanimibe, MLE-301 and any
future product candidates. In order to successfully challenge the
validity of any such U.S. patent in federal court, we would need to
overcome a presumption of validity. As this burden is a high one
requiring us to present clear and convincing evidence as to the
invalidity of any such U.S. patent claim, there is no assurance
that a court of competent jurisdiction would invalidate the claims
of any such U.S. patent. If we are found to infringe a
third-party’s valid and enforceable intellectual property rights,
we could be required to obtain a license from such third-party to
continue developing, manufacturing and marketing our product
candidate and technology. However, we may not be able to obtain any
required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even
if we were able to obtain a license, it could be non-exclusive,
thereby giving our competitors and other third-parties access to
the same technologies licensed to us, and it could require us to
make substantial licensing and royalty payments. We could be
forced, including by court order, to cease developing,
manufacturing and commercializing the infringing technology or
product candidate. In addition, we could be found liable for
monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees, if
we are found to have willfully infringed a patent or other
intellectual property right. A finding of infringement could
prevent us from manufacturing and commercializing nevanimibe,
MLE-301 or any future product candidates or force us to cease some
or all of our business operations, which would have a material
adverse effect on our business. Claims that we have misappropriated
the confidential information or trade secrets of third-parties
could have a similar material adverse effect on our business. Even
if we prevail in such infringement claims, patent litigation can be
expensive and time consuming, which would harm our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our
patents, the patents of our licensors or our other intellectual
property rights, which could be expensive, time consuming and
unsuccessful.
Competitors may infringe or otherwise violate our patents, the
patents of our licensors or our other intellectual property rights.
To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to
file legal claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. In
addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a
patent of ours or our licensors is not valid or is unenforceable,
or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at
issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology
in question. An adverse result in any litigation or defense
proceedings could put one or more of ours patents at risk of being
invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent
applications at risk of not issuing. The initiation of a claim
against a third-party may also cause the third-party to bring
counter claims against us such as claims asserting that our patents
are invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United
States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or
unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge
could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory
requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness,
non-enablement or lack of statutory subject matter. Grounds for an
unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone
connected with prosecution of the patent
withheld relevant material information from the USPTO, or made a
materially misleading statement, during prosecution. Third-parties
may also raise similar validity claims before the USPTO in
post-grant proceedings such as ex parte reexaminations, inter
partes review, or post-grant review, or oppositions or similar
proceedings outside the United States, in parallel with litigation
or even outside the context of litigation. The outcome following
legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is
unpredictable. We cannot be certain that there is no invalidating
prior art, of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during
prosecution. For the patents and patent applications that we have
licensed, we may have limited or no right to participate in the
defense of any licensed patents against challenge by a third-party.
If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity
or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all,
of any future patent protection on our current or future product
candidates. Such a loss of patent protection could have material
adverse effect on our business.
We may not be able to prevent, alone or with our licensors,
misappropriation of our intellectual property rights, particularly
in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully
as in the United States. Our business could be harmed if in
litigation the prevailing party does not offer us a license on
commercially reasonable terms. Any litigation or other proceedings
to enforce our intellectual property rights may fail, and even if
successful, may result in substantial costs and distract our
management and other employees. Even if we prevail in such
infringement claims, patent litigation can be expensive and time
consuming, which would harm our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery
required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there
is a risk that some of our confidential information could be
compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. There
could also be public announcements of the results of hearings,
motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities
analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it
could have an adverse effect on the price of our common
stock.
Changes in U.S. patent law or the patent law of other countries or
jurisdictions could diminish the value of patents in general,
thereby impairing our ability to protect our product
candidates.
The United States has recently enacted and implemented wide-ranging
patent reform legislation. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on
several patent cases in recent years, either narrowing the
scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or
weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. In
addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to our ability to
obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has
created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once
obtained. Depending on actions by the U.S. Congress, federal
courts, USPTO, and the relevant law-making bodies in other
countries, the laws and regulations governing patents could change
in unpredictable ways that would weaken our ability to obtain new
patents or to enforce patents that we have licensed or that we
might obtain in the future. Similarly, changes in patent law and
regulations in other countries or jurisdictions or changes in the
governmental bodies that enforce them or changes in how the
relevant governmental authority enforces patent laws or regulations
may weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce patents
that we have licensed or that we may obtain in the
future.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights
throughout the world, which could have a material adverse effect on
our business.
Filing, prosecuting and defending patents covering nevanimibe,
MLE-301 and any future product candidates throughout the world
would be prohibitively expensive. Competitors may use our
technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent
protection to develop our own drugs and, further, may export
otherwise infringing drugs to territories where we may obtain
patent protection, but where patent enforcement is not as strong as
that in the United States. These drugs may compete with our drugs
in jurisdictions where we do not have any issued or licensed
patents and any future patent claims or other intellectual property
rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from so
competing.
Our reliance on third-parties requires us to share our trade
secrets, which increases the possibility that a competitor will
discover them or that our trade secrets will be misappropriated or
disclosed.
If we rely on third-parties to manufacture and commercialize
nevanimibe, MLE-301 or any future product candidates, or if we
collaborate with third-parties for the development of nevanimibe,
MLE-301 or any future product candidates, we must, at times, share
trade secrets with them. We may also conduct joint research and
development programs that may require us to share trade secrets
under the terms of our research and development partnerships or
similar agreements. We seek to protect our proprietary technology
in part by entering into confidentiality agreements and, if
applicable, material transfer agreements, consulting agreements or
other similar agreements with our advisors, employees, third-party
contractors and consultants prior to beginning research or
disclosing proprietary information. These agreements typically
limit the rights of the third-parties to use or disclose our
confidential information, including our trade secrets. Despite the
contractual provisions employed when working with third-parties,
the need to share trade secrets and other confidential information
increases the risk that such trade secrets become known by our
competitors, are inadvertently incorporated into the technology of
others, or are disclosed or used in violation of
these agreements. Given that our proprietary position is based, in
part, on our know-how and trade secrets, a competitor’s discovery
of our trade secrets or other unauthorized use or disclosure could
have an adverse effect on our business and results of
operations.
In addition, these agreements typically restrict the ability of our
advisors, employees, third-party contractors and consultants to
publish data potentially relating to our trade secrets. Despite our
efforts to protect our trade secrets, our competitors may discover
our trade secrets, either through breach of our agreements with
third-parties, independent development or publication of
information by any of third-party collaborators. A competitor’s
discovery of our trade secrets would harm our
business.
We may be subject to claims that our employees, consultants or
independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed
confidential information of their former employers or other
third-parties.
Certain of our employees, consultants or advisors are currently, or
were previously, employed at universities or other biotechnology or
pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential
competitors. Although we try to ensure that our employees,
consultants and advisors do not use the proprietary information or
know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to
claims that these individuals or we have used or disclosed
intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary
information, of any such individual’s current or former employer.
Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we
fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary
damages we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or
personnel. Even if we are successful in defending against such
claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a
distraction to management.
In addition, while it is our approach to require our employees and
contractors who may be involved in the conception or development of
intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such
intellectual property to us, we may be unsuccessful in executing
such an agreement with each party who, in fact, conceives or
develops intellectual property that we regard as our own. The
assignment of intellectual property rights may not be
self-executing or the assignment agreements may be breached, and we
may be forced to bring claims against third-parties, or defend
claims that they may bring against us, to determine the ownership
of what we regard as our intellectual property.
Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third-Parties
We do not have our own manufacturing capabilities and will rely on
third-parties to produce clinical and commercial supplies of
nevanimibe, MLE-301 and any future product candidates.
We have no experience in drug formulation or manufacturing and do
not own or operate, and we do not expect to own or operate,
facilities for product manufacturing, storage and distribution, or
testing. We currently rely on contract manufacturing organizations,
or CMOs, to produce nevanimibe for our clinical trials.
Additionally, we rely on CMOs with respect to the manufacture of
drug product for our clinical trials, including for filing and
packaging. Any significant delay in the supply of a product
candidate, or the raw material components thereof, for an ongoing
clinical trial due to the need to replenish the supply or replace a
third-party manufacturer could considerably delay completion of our
clinical trials, product testing and potential regulatory approval
of our product candidates. If we or our manufacturer are unable to
purchase these raw materials after regulatory approval has been
obtained for our product candidates, the commercial launch of our
product candidates would be delayed or there would be a shortage in
supply, which would impair our ability to generate revenue from the
sale of our product candidates.
We will need to rely on third-party manufacturers to supply us with
sufficient quantities of nevanimibe and MLE-301 to be used, if
approved, for its commercialization. The facilities used by our
contract manufacturers to manufacture our product candidates must
be approved by the FDA pursuant to inspections that will be
conducted after we submit our NDA to the FDA. We do not control the
manufacturing process of, and are completely dependent on, our
contract manufacturing partners for compliance with cGMP
requirements for manufacture of drug products. If our contract
manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that
conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory
requirements of the FDA or others, they will not be able to secure
or maintain regulatory approval for their manufacturing facilities.
In addition, we have no control over the ability of our contract
manufacturers to maintain adequate quality control, quality
assurance and qualified personnel. If the FDA or a comparable
foreign regulatory authority does not approve these facilities for
the manufacture of our product candidates or if it withdraws any
such approval in the future, we may need to find alternative
manufacturing facilities, which would significantly impact our
ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our
product candidates, if approved. Further, our reliance on
third-party manufacturers entails risks, to which we would not be
subject if we manufactured product candidates ourselves,
including:
•inability
to meet our product specifications and quality requirements
consistently;
•delay
or inability to procure or expand sufficient manufacturing
capacity;
•issues
related to scale-up of manufacturing;
•costs
and validation of new equipment and facilities required for
scale-up;
•failure
to comply with cGMP and similar foreign standards;
•inability
to negotiate manufacturing agreements with third-parties under
commercially reasonable terms;
•termination
or nonrenewal of manufacturing agreements with third-parties in a
manner or at a time that is costly or damaging to us;
•reliance
on a limited number of sources, and in some cases, single sources
for product components;
•lack
of qualified backup suppliers for those materials that are
currently purchased from a sole or single source
supplier;
•operations
of our third-party manufacturers or suppliers could be disrupted by
conditions unrelated to our business or operations, including
public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, natural
disasters, such as earthquakes, fires or floods, or the bankruptcy
of the manufacturer or supplier;
•inability
to find replacement manufacturers or suppliers, if necessary, on
terms favorable to us, in a timely manner, or at all;
•carrier
disruptions or increased costs that are beyond our control;
and
•failure
to deliver our products under specified storage conditions and in a
timely manner.
Any of these events could lead to clinical trial delays, failure to
obtain regulatory approval or impact our ability to successfully
commercialize our products once approved. Some of these events
could be the basis for FDA or other regulatory authority action,
including injunction, recall, seizure, or total or partial
suspension of production.
We may in the future enter into collaborations with third-parties
to develop our product candidates. If these collaborations are not
successful, our business could be harmed.
We may enter into collaborations with third-parties in the future.
We may in the future determine to collaborate with other
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for development and
potential commercialization of our product candidates. These
relationships, or those like them, may require us to incur
non-recurring and other charges, increase our near- and long-term
expenditures, issue securities that dilute our existing
stockholders or disrupt our management and business. In addition,
we could face significant competition in seeking appropriate
collaborators and the negotiation process is time-consuming and
complex. Our ability to reach a definitive collaboration agreement
will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the
collaborator’s resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of
the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator’s
evaluation of several factors. If we license rights to our product
candidates, we may not be able to realize the benefit of such
transactions if we are unable to successfully integrate them with
our existing operations and company culture.
If any such potential future collaborations do not result in the
successful development and commercialization of product candidates,
or if one of our future collaborators terminates its agreement with
us, we may not receive any future research funding or milestone or
royalty payments under the collaboration. If we do not receive the
funding we expect under these agreements, the development of our
product candidates could be delayed and we may need additional
resources to develop our product candidates. In addition, if one of
our future collaborators terminates its agreement with us, we may
find it more difficult to attract new collaborators and the
perception of us in the business and financial communities could be
adversely affected. All of the risks relating to product
development, regulatory approval and commercialization apply to the
activities of our potential future collaborators.
We may not be successful in finding strategic collaborators for
continuing development of nevanimibe, MLE-301 or successfully
commercializing or competing in the market for certain
diseases.
We may seek to develop strategic partnerships for developing and
commercializing nevanimibe or MLE-301, due to capital costs
required to develop the product candidate, manufacturing
constraints or anticipated commercialization costs. We may
not
be successful in our efforts to establish such a strategic
partnership or other alternative arrangements for nevanimibe or
MLE-301 because our research and development pipeline may be
insufficient or third-parties may not view nevanimibe or MLE-301 as
having the requisite potential to demonstrate safety and efficacy.
In addition, we may be restricted under an existing collaboration
agreement from entering into a future agreement with a potential
collaborator. We cannot be certain that, following a strategic
transaction or license, we will achieve an economic benefit that
justifies such transaction.
If we are unable to reach agreements with suitable collaborators on
a timely basis, on acceptable terms or at all, we may have to
curtail the development of our product candidates, reduce or delay
the development programs, delay potential commercialization, reduce
the scope of any sales or marketing activities or increase our
expenditures and undertake development or commercialization
activities at our own expense. If we elect to fund development or
commercialization activities on our own, we may need to obtain
additional expertise and additional capital, which may not be
available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we fail to enter
into collaborations and do not have sufficient funds or expertise
to undertake the necessary development and commercialization
activities, we may not be able to further develop nevanimibe or
MLE-301, which could harm our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
We rely on third-parties to conduct, supervise and monitor our
clinical trials, and if those third-parties perform in an
unsatisfactory manner, it may harm our business.
We currently do not have the ability to independently conduct
preclinical studies and clinical trials that comply with the
regulatory requirements known as good laboratory practice, or GLP,
and good clinical practice, or GCP, respectively. We also do not
currently have the ability to independently conduct large clinical
trials. We intend to rely on CROs and clinical trial sites to
ensure the proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials, and we
expect to have limited influence over their actual
performance.
We intend to rely upon CROs to monitor and manage data for our
clinical programs, as well as the execution of future preclinical
studies. We expect to control only certain aspects of our CROs’
activities. Nevertheless, we will be responsible for ensuring that
each of our studies or trials is conducted in accordance with the
applicable protocol, legal, regulatory and scientific standards and
our reliance on the CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory
responsibilities.
We and our CROs will be required to comply with GLP and GCP, which
are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA and are also
required by the Competent Authorities of the Member States of the
European Economic Area and comparable foreign regulatory
authorities in the form of International Conference on
Harmonization guidelines for any of our product candidates that are
in preclinical and clinical development, respectively. The
regulatory authorities enforce GCP through periodic inspections of
trial sponsors, principal investigators and clinical trial sites.
Although we rely on CROs to conduct any future GLP-compliant
preclinical and preclinical studies and current or planned
GCP-compliant clinical trials, we remain responsible for ensuring
that each of our GLP preclinical studies and clinical trials is
conducted in accordance with our investigational plan and protocol
and applicable laws and regulations, and our reliance on the CROs
does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. If we or
our CROs fail to comply with GCP, the clinical data generated in
our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or
comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform
additional clinical trials before approving our marketing
applications. Accordingly, if our CROs fail to comply with these
regulations or fail to recruit a sufficient number of subjects, we
may be required to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the
regulatory approval process.
While we will have agreements governing their activities, our CROs
are and will not be our employees, and we will not control whether
or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our future
clinical and preclinical programs. These CROs may also have
relationships with other commercial entities, including our
competitors, for whom they may also be conducting clinical trials,
or other drug development activities which could harm our business.
We face the risk of potential unauthorized disclosure or
misappropriation of our intellectual property by CROs, which may
reduce our trade secret protection and allow our potential
competitors to access and exploit our proprietary technology. In
addition, our CROs may experience business disruptions from public
health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and accompany
shelter-in-place or similar orders. If our CROs do not successfully
carry out their contractual duties or obligations, fail to meet
expected deadlines, or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical
data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to its
clinical protocols or regulatory requirements or for any other
reasons, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or
terminated, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval
for, or successfully commercialize any product candidate that we
develop. As a result, our financial results and the commercial
prospects for any product candidate that we develop would be
harmed, our costs could increase, and our ability to generate
revenue could be delayed.
If our relationships with these CROs terminate, we may not be able
to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs or do so on
commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional CROs
involves substantial cost and requires management time and focus.
In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new CRO
commences work. As a result, delays occur,
which can negatively impact our ability to meet our desired
clinical development timelines. In addition, we may not be able to
enter into arrangements with alternative CROs or do so on
commercially reasonable terms as a result of business disruptions
from public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Though we intend to carefully manage our relationships with our
CROs, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter
challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or
challenges will not have a negative impact on our business and
financial condition. Further, we currently rely on several CROs to
conduct our ongoing clinical trials and may engage one of these
same CROs to conduct additional clinical trials on our behalf. To
the extent that these CROs fail to comply with GLP or their
contractual obligations to us for any reason, the negative impact
on our business and financial condition could be more profound than
if we relied on a greater number of CROs.
Risks Related to Our Business Operations, Employee Matters and
Managing Growth
Our business, preclinical studies and clinical development programs
and timelines, our financial condition and results of operations
could be materially and adversely affected by the current COVID-19
pandemic.
In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2,
causing COVID-19, was initially reported and has since been
declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The COVID-19
pandemic has resulted in travel and other restrictions in order to
reduce the spread of the disease, including state and local orders
across the country, which, among other things, direct individuals
to shelter at their places of residence, direct businesses and
governmental agencies to cease non-essential operations at physical
locations, prohibit certain non-essential gatherings, and order
cessation of non-essential travel. In response to these public
health directives and orders, we have implemented work-from-home
policies for certain employees. The effects of the executive
orders, the shelter-in-place orders and our work-from-home policies
may negatively impact productivity, disrupt our business and delay
our clinical programs and timelines, the magnitude of which will
depend, in part, on the length and severity of the restrictions and
other limitations on our ability to conduct our business in the
ordinary course. These and similar, and perhaps more severe,
disruptions in our operations could negatively impact our business,
operating results and financial condition.
Quarantines, shelter-in-place and similar government orders related
to COVID-19 may adversely impact our business operations and the
business operations of our contract research organizations
conducting our clinical trials and our third-party manufacturing
facilities in the United States and other countries. In particular,
some of our third-party manufacturers which we use for the supply
of materials for product candidates or other materials necessary to
manufacture product to conduct preclinical studies and clinical
trials are located in countries affected by COVID-19, and should
they experience disruptions, such as temporary closures or
suspension of services, we would likely experience delays in
advancing these tests and trials. Currently, we expect no material
impact on the clinical supply of any of our product
candidates.
In addition, our clinical trials may be affected by the COVID-19
pandemic. For example, clinical site initiation and patient
enrollment may be delayed due to prioritization of hospital
resources toward the COVID-19 pandemic. Some patients may not be
able to comply with clinical trial protocols if quarantines impede
patient movement or interrupt healthcare services. Similarly, our
ability to recruit and retain patients and principal investigators
and site staff who, as healthcare providers, may have heightened
exposure to COVID-19 and adversely impact our clinical trial
operations. As a result, we may face delays in meeting our
anticipated timelines for our ongoing and planned clinical
trials.
The spread of COVID-19, which has caused a broad impact globally,
may materially affect us economically. While the potential economic
impact brought by, and the duration of, COVID-19 may be difficult
to assess or predict, a widespread pandemic could result in
significant disruption of global financial markets, reducing our
ability to access capital, which could in the future negatively
affect our liquidity. In addition, a recession or market correction
resulting from the spread of COVID-19 could materially affect our
business and the value of our common stock.
The global pandemic of COVID-19 continues to rapidly evolve. The
extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business, our
clinical development and regulatory efforts will depend on future
developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with
confidence, such as the duration of the outbreak, travel
restrictions, quarantines, social distancing requirements and
business closures in the United States and other countries, and
business disruptions, and the effectiveness of actions taken in the
United States and other countries to contain and treat the disease.
Accordingly, we do not yet know the full extent of potential delays
or impacts on our business, our clinical and regulatory activities,
healthcare systems or the global economy as a whole. However, these
impacts could adversely affect our business, financial condition,
results of operations and growth prospects.
In addition, to the extent the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic adversely
affects our business and results of operations, it may also have
the effect of heightening many of the other risks and uncertainties
described in this ‘‘Risk Factors’’ section.
Potential future acquisitions could prove difficult to integrate,
disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and strain our
resources.
We may acquire companies, technologies or product candidates that
we believe could complement or expand our business. Integrating the
operations of acquired businesses successfully or otherwise
realizing any of the anticipated benefits of acquisitions involves
a number of potential challenges. The failure to meet these
integration challenges could seriously harm our financial condition
and results of operations. Realizing the benefits of acquisitions
depends in part on the integration of operations and personnel.
These integration activities are complex and time-consuming, and we
may encounter unexpected difficulties or incur unexpected costs,
including with respect to:
•diversion
of management attention from ongoing business concerns to
integration matters;
•coordinating
clinical and preclinical development plans;
•consolidating
and rationalizing information technology and accounting platforms
and administrative infrastructures;
•complexities
associated with managing the geographic separation of the combined
businesses and consolidating multiple physical
locations;
•reconciling
different corporate cultures; and
•retaining
scientific and other key employees.
Acquired businesses may have liabilities, adverse operating issues
or other matters of concern arise following the acquisition that we
fail to discover through due diligence prior to the acquisition.
Further, our acquisition targets may not have as robust internal
controls over financial reporting as would be expected of a public
company. Acquisitions may also result in the recording of goodwill
and other intangible assets that are subject to potential
impairment in the future that could harm our financial results. We
may also become subject to new regulations as a result of an
acquisition, including if we acquire operations in a country in
which we do not already operate. If we fail to properly evaluate
acquisitions or unanticipated issues arise following the
acquisition, we may incur costs in excess of what we anticipate and
may not otherwise achieve the anticipated benefits of any such
acquisitions.
We are highly dependent
on the services of our key executives and personnel, including
Julia C. Owens, Ph.D., our chief executive
officer,
Christophe Arbet-Engels,
our chief medical officer,
and Ryan Zeidan, Ph.D., our chief development officer, and if we
are not able to retain these members of our management team or
recruit and retain additional management, clinical and scientific
personnel, our business will be harmed.
We are highly dependent on
Drs. Owens, Arbet-Engels, and Zeidan. The
employment
agreements we have with these officers do not prevent such persons
from terminating their employment with us at any time. Further,
these officers may be unable to perform their duties or have
limited availability due to COVID-19 or other health emergencies.
The temporary or permanent loss of the services of any of these
persons could impede the achievement of our research, development
and commercialization objectives.
In addition, we are dependent on our continued ability to attract,
retain and motivate highly qualified additional management,
clinical and scientific personnel. If we are not able to retain our
management and to attract, on acceptable terms, additional
qualified personnel necessary for the continued development of our
business, we may not be able to sustain our operations or
grow.
We may not be able to attract or retain qualified personnel in the
future due to the intense competition for qualified personnel among
biotechnology, pharmaceutical and other businesses. Many of the
other pharmaceutical companies that we compete against for
qualified personnel and consultants have greater financial and
other resources, different risk profiles, are located in
geographies with a larger biotechnology industry presence and a
longer history in the industry than we do. They also may provide
more diverse opportunities and better chances for career
advancement. Some of these characteristics may be more appealing to
high-quality candidates and consultants than what we have to offer.
If we are unable to continue to attract, retain and motivate
high-quality personnel and consultants to accomplish our business
objectives, the rate and success at which we can discover and
develop product candidates and our business will be limited and we
may experience constraints on our development
objectives.
Our future performance will also depend, in part, on our ability to
successfully integrate newly hired executive officers into our
management team and our ability to develop an effective working
relationship among senior management. Our failure to integrate
these individuals and create effective working relationships among
them and other members of management could result in inefficiencies
in the development and commercialization of our product candidates,
harming future regulatory approvals, sales of our product
candidates and our results of operations. Additionally, we do not
currently maintain “key person” life insurance on the lives of our
executives or any of our employees.
We must attract and retain highly skilled employees to
succeed.
To succeed, we must recruit, develop, retain, manage and motivate
qualified clinical, scientific, technical, general and
administrative and management personnel while facing significant
competition for experienced personnel. In April 2020, we announced
our decision to discontinue the development of livoletide as a
potential treatment for PWS. In connection with the discontinuation
of the livoletide program in PWS, we are in the process of
eliminating employee positions representing approximately 30% of
our prior headcount,
with the majority of the reduction in personnel completed in April
2020, or the restructuring. The restructuring could
harm
our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. The
restructuring could also result in reduced morale and productivity
among our remaining personnel.
Our inability or failure to successfully attract and retain
qualified personnel, particularly at the management level, could
adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan and harm
our operating results. In particular, the loss of one or more of
our executive officers could be detrimental if we cannot recruit
suitable replacements in a timely manner. The competition for
qualified personnel in the pharmaceutical field is intense and we
may be unable to continue to attract and retain qualified personnel
necessary for the development of our business or to recruit
suitable replacement personnel.
Many of the other pharmaceutical companies with which we compete
for qualified personnel have greater financial and other resources,
different risk profiles and a longer history in the industry than
we have. These companies may also provide more diverse
opportunities and better or more chances for development or career
advancement. Some of these characteristics may appeal more to
high-quality candidates than what we offer. If we are unable to
continue to attract and retain personnel, the rate at which we can
discover, develop and advance current and future product
candidates, and our success in doing so, will be limited and our
business may be harmed.
Our employees, independent contractors, principal investigators,
consultants, commercial collaborators, service providers and other
vendors may engage in misconduct or other improper activities,
including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements,
which could have an adverse effect on our results of
operations.
We are exposed to the risk of fraud or other misconduct by our
employees, principal investigators, consultants and commercial
partners. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional
failures to comply with FDA regulations or the regulations
applicable in other jurisdictions, provide accurate information to
the FDA and other regulatory authorities, comply with healthcare
fraud and abuse laws and regulations in the United States and
abroad, report financial information or data accurately or disclose
unauthorized activities to us. In particular, sales, marketing and
business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to
extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud,
misconduct, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices.
These laws and regulations restrict or prohibit a wide range of
pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission,
customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Such
misconduct also could involve the improper use of information
obtained in the course of clinical trials or interactions with the
FDA or other regulatory authorities, which could result in
regulatory sanctions and cause serious harm to our reputation. It
is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct,
and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may
not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or
losses or in protecting us from government investigations or other
actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with these
laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us
and we are not successful in defending itself or asserting our
rights, those actions could have a negative impact on our business,
financial condition and results of operations, including the
imposition of significant fines or other sanctions.
We may be delayed in our receipt of certain tax benefits that Alizé
historically received as a French technology company.
As a French technology company, Alizé historically benefited from
certain tax advantages, including the French research tax credit
(credit
d’impot recherche),
or CIR. The CIR is a French tax credit aimed at stimulating
research and development and can offset French corporate income tax
due. Alizé has historically received CIR reimbursements promptly
following filing for such reimbursements with applicable French
taxing authorities. For the year ended December 31, 2018, claims
were made totaling $1.3 million, which we received in the third
quarter of 2019. We filed claims totaling $1.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2019, which we received in the second quarter of
2020. In the future, we may no longer qualify as a French small or
medium size enterprise, and, accordingly, we may be subject to a
three-year waiting period for reimbursement of CIRs, which could
adversely affect the combined business’s results of operations and
cash flows. In addition, the amount of CIR
received is, among other factors, dependent upon incurring
qualified research and development expenses and maintaining a
certain level of employee salaries and other personnel costs in
France. The number of our research and development employees in
France decreased during the year ended December 31, 2019 and we
expect a decrease in qualified research and development expenses
for the year ending December 31, 2020 due to the discontinuation of
our livoletide program. Therefore, the amount of CIR we are
eligible for may decrease.
Our internal computer systems, or those of our collaborators or
other contractors or consultants, may fail or suffer security
breaches, which could result in a material disruption of our
product development programs.
Our internal computer systems and those of our current and any
future collaborators and other contractors or consultants are
vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access,
natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and
electrical failures. While we are not aware of any such material
system failure, accident or security breach to date, if such an
event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it
could result in a material disruption of our development programs
and our business operations, whether due to a loss of our trade
secrets or other proprietary information or other similar
disruptions. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from
completed or future clinical trials could result in delays in our
regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to
recover or reproduce the data. To the extent that any disruption or
security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data
or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or
proprietary information, we could incur liability, our competitive
position could be harmed and the further development and
commercialization of our product candidates could be
delayed.
We may be exposed to significant foreign exchange
risk.
We incur portions of our expenses, and may in the future derive
revenue, in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, in particular,
the euro. As a result, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange
risk as our results of operations and cash flows are subject to
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Any fluctuation in
the exchange rate of these foreign currencies may negatively impact
our business, financial condition and operating results. Global
economic events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have and may
continue to significantly impact local economies and the foreign
exchange markets, which may increase the risks associated with
sales denominated in foreign currencies. We currently do not engage
in hedging transactions to protect against uncertainty in future
exchange rates between particular foreign currencies and the euro.
Therefore, for example, an increase in the value of the euro
against the U.S. dollar could be expected to have a negative impact
on our operating expenses as euro denominated expenses, if any,
would be translated into U.S. dollars at an increased value. We
cannot predict the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, and
foreign currency fluctuations in the future may adversely affect
our financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
The risks arising with respect to the historic OvaScience business
and operations may be different from what we anticipate, which
could lead to significant, unexpected costs and liabilities and
could materially and adversely affect our business going
forward.
It is possible that we may not have fully anticipated the extent of
the risks associated with recent Merger we completed with
OvaScience in 2018. After the Merger, OvaScience’s historic
business was discontinued, but prior to the transaction OvaScience
had a significant operating history. As a consequence, we may be
subject to claims, demands for payment, regulatory issues, costs
and liabilities that were not and are not currently expected or
anticipated. Notwithstanding our exercise of due diligence
pre-transaction and winding down of the OvaScience business
post-transaction, the risks involved with taking over a business
with a significant operating history and the costs and liabilities
associated with these risks may be greater than we anticipate. We
may not be able to contain or control the costs or liabilities
associated with OvaScience’s historic business, which could
materially and adversely affect our business, liquidity, capital
resources or results of operation.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock and Our Status as a
Public Company
The trading price of the shares of our common stock has been and is
likely to continue to be volatile, and purchasers of our common
stock could incur substantial losses.
The market price of our common stock has been and is likely to
continue to be highly volatile and could be subject to wide
fluctuations in price in response to various factors. A number of
factors could influence the volatility in the trading price of our
common stock, including changes in the economy or in the financial
markets, including recently in connection with the ongoing COVID-19
pandemic, industry-related developments, and the impact of material
events and changes in our operations, including as a result of our
recent announcement to discontinue our livoletide program in PWS.
Worsening economic conditions and other adverse effects or
developments relating to our business or the ongoing COVID-19
pandemic may negatively affect the market price of our common
stock. The market price for our common stock is likely to continue
to be
volatile, particularly due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and
subject to significant price and volume fluctuations in response to
market, industry and other factors, including the risk factors
described in this “Risk Factors” section. As a result of this
volatility, investors may not be able to sell their common stock at
or above the price paid for the shares. The market price for our
common stock may be influenced by many factors,
including:
•the
commencement, enrollment or results of our clinical trials or
changes in the development status of our product
candidates;
•any
delay in our regulatory filings for any product candidate we may
develop, and any adverse development or perceived adverse
development with respect to the applicable regulatory authority’s
review of such filings, including without limitation the FDA’s
issuance of a “refusal to file” letter or a request for additional
information;
•adverse
results from, delays in or termination of clinical
trials;
•adverse
regulatory decisions, including failure to receive regulatory
approval of our product candidates;
•unanticipated
serious safety concerns related to the use of our product
candidates;
•changes
in financial estimates by us or by any securities analysts who
might cover our stock;
•conditions
or trends in our industry;
•changes
in the structure of healthcare payment systems;
•changes
in the market valuations of similar companies;
•stock
market price and volume fluctuations of comparable companies and,
in particular, those that operate in the biopharmaceutical
industry;
•publication
of research reports about us or our industry or positive or
negative recommendations or withdrawal of research coverage by
securities analysts;
•announcements
by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic
partnerships or divestitures;
•announcements
of investigations or regulatory scrutiny of our operations or
lawsuits filed against us;