ZOM Zomedica Corp

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Stated in United States dollars)

1. Nature of operations and going concern

Zomedica Pharmaceuticals Corp. ("Zomedica" or the “Company”) was incorporated on January 7, 2013 under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta) as Wise Oakwood Ventures Inc. (“WOW”) and was classified as a capital pool company, as defined in Policy 2.4 of the TSX Venture Exchange. ZoMedica Pharmaceuticals Inc. was incorporated on May 14, 2015 under the Canada Business Corporations Act.

On April 21, 2016, the Company closed its qualifying transaction (“Transaction”), consisting of the acquisition of ZoMedica Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“ZoMedica”) pursuant to a three-cornered amalgamation, whereby ZoMedica was amalgamated with 9674128 Canada Inc. (which was wholly-owned by WOW) and common shares and options of the Company were issued to former holders of ZoMedica securities as consideration. The amalgamated company changed its name to Zomedica Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and WOW subsequently changed its name to Zomedica Pharmaceuticals Corp. Prior to completion of the Transaction, WOW consolidated its common shares on the basis of the one post-consolidation common share for every 2.5 pre-consolidation common shares. The Transaction constituted WOW’s qualifying transaction under TSX Venture Exchange Policy 2.4 – Capital Pool Companies. The shares of Zomedica Pharmaceuticals Corp. began trading on the TSX Venture Exchange under the new symbol “ZOM” on Monday, May 2, 2016. On June 21, 2016, the Company filed Articles of Amalgamation and vertically amalgamated with its wholly-owned subsidiary, Zomedica Pharmaceuticals Ltd. On February 10, 2020 the Company voluntarily delisted from the TSX-V.

Zomedica has one corporate subsidiary, Zomedica Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware company whose results and operations are included in these consolidated financial statements. We are a development stage veterinary health company focused on creating point-of-care diagnostic platforms for use by veterinarians treating companion animals by focusing on the unmet needs of clinical veterinarians. Zomedica's head office is located at 100 Phoenix Drive, Suite 180, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 and its registered office is located at 3400, 350-7th Ave SW, Calgary, AB, T2P 3N9.

The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently in the condensed unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. The condensed unaudited interim consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information required for annual consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2020.

These condensed unaudited interim consolidated financial statements were prepared using the same basis of presentation, accounting policies and methods of computation as those of the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Basis of consolidation

These condensed unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned operating subsidiary, Zomedica Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

Use of estimates

The preparation of the condensed unaudited interim consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Areas where significant judgment is involved in making estimates are, the determination of fair value of stock-based compensation, the useful lives of property and equipment, allocation of proceeds from financings to shares and warrants, fair value of placement agent warrants and forecasting future cash flows for assessing the going concern assumption.

Basis of measurement

The condensed unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis except as otherwise noted.

Functional and reporting currencies

The Company’s and subsidiary’s functional currency, as determined by management, is US dollars, which is also the Company’s reporting currency.

The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods and companies presented in the condensed unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

Research and development

Research and development costs related to continued research and development programs are expensed as incurred in accordance with ASC topic 730.

Share issue costs

Share issue costs are recorded as a reduction of the proceeds from the issuance of capital stock.

Translation of foreign currencies

In respect of other transactions denominated in currencies other than the Company and its wholly owned operating subsidiaries’ functional currencies, the monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured at the period end rates. Revenue and expenses are measured at rates of exchange prevailing on the transaction dates. All of the exchange gains or losses resulting from these other transactions are recognized in the condensed unaudited interim consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Stock-based compensation

The Company measures the cost of equity-settled transactions by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted if the fair value of the goods or services received by the Company cannot be reliably estimated.

The Company calculates stock-based compensation using the fair value method, under which the fair value of the options at the grant date is calculated using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and subsequently expensed over the vesting period of the option using the graded vesting method. The provisions of the Company's stock-based compensation plans do not require the Company to settle any options by transferring cash or other assets, and therefore the Company classifies the awards as equity. Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of stock-based payment awards that are ultimately expected to vest.

The Company estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

Loss per share

Basic loss per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing the loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through the exercise or conversion of stock options, restricted stock awards, warrants and convertible securities. In certain circumstances, the conversion of options is excluded from diluted EPS if the effect of such inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

The dilutive effect of stock options is determined using the treasury stock method. Stock options to purchase common shares of the Company during the period were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the Company has incurred a loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

Comprehensive loss

The Company follows ASC topic 220. This statement establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive (loss) income and its components. Comprehensive loss is net loss plus certain items that are recorded directly to shareholders' equity. The Company has no other comprehensive loss items.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and revenue and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and further periods if the review affects both current and future periods.

Critical areas of estimation and judgements in applying accounting policies include the following:

Going concern

These condensed unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP on a going concern basis, which assumes the realization of assets and discharge of liabilities in the normal course of business within the foreseeable future. Management uses judgment in determining assumptions for cash flow projections, such as anticipated financing, anticipated sales and future commitments to assess the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Stock-based payments

The Company estimates the fair value of convertible securities such as options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model which requires significant estimation around assumptions and inputs such as expected term to maturity, expected volatility and expected dividends.

Useful lives of property and equipment

The Company reviews the estimated useful lives of property and equipment with definite useful lives at the end of each year and assesses whether the useful lives of certain items should be shortened or extended, due to various factors including technology, competition and revised service offerings. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company was not required to adjust the useful lives of any assets based on the factors described above. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable.

The impact of the novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”)

Since December 31, 2019, the outbreak of the novel strain of coronavirus, specifically identified as “COVID-19”, has resulted in the World Health Organization declaring this virus a global pandemic in March 2020. Governments around the world have enacted emergency measures to combat the spread of the virus. These measures, which include the implementation of travel bans, self-imposed quarantine periods and social distancing and closure of businesses have caused material disruption to businesses resulting in an economic slowdown. Governments and central banks have responded with significant monetary and fiscal interventions designed to stabilize the financial markets. A critical estimate for the Company is to assess the impact of the pandemic on the recoverability of long-lived assets as well as the availability of future financing in assessing the going concern assumption.

In February 2020, the Company disposed of assets with a net book value of $75,234. The Company received proceeds of $5,400 and recorded a loss of $69,834 in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and six months ended June 30, 2020.

In February 2020, the Company reclassified $299,268 of prepaid expenses to property and equipment for leasehold improvements that became ready for use in February 2020 but were paid for in 2019.

Total estimated future amortization of intangible assets for each fiscal year is as follows:

The Company adopted ASC 842 with an initial application date of January 1, 2019. The Company was party to two lease agreements under which it rented office and laboratory space. The rent for both leases was prepaid upon inception and therefore at January 1, 2019, the Company reclassified its prepaid lease balances of $1,613,038 to a right-of-use asset. The Company recorded nil and $42,448 of amortization on the right-of-use asset for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 (June 30, 2019 - $254,690).

On February 1, 2020 the Company cancelled its existing lease with Wickfield Phoenix LLC and entered into a new lease. The new lease period is for 60 months, commencing on February 1, 2020 and ending on January 31, 2025 with a monthly rent payment of $32,452 escalating to $36,525 over the lease period. Upon cancellation of the existing lease, the Company received a refund of prepaid rent in the amount of $1,002,113. The carrying value of the right of use asset was $1,061,210 upon cancellation. In February 2020, the Company recorded a loss on right-of-use asset of $59,097 in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

On February 1, 2020, the Company recorded a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability in the amount of $1,553,611 using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate of 12%. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company recognized $103,375 and $172,291 in rent expense with $21,763 and $38,992 recorded in research and development expenses and $81,612 and $137,630 recorded in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company recognized $5,940 and $11,880 in rent expense with nil recorded in research and development expenses and $5,940 and $11,880 recorded in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company also recorded $4,331 in rent expense related to month to month leases with the entirety in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

On October 17, 2017, the Company entered into a loan arrangement with a shareholder of the Company, pursuant to which such shareholder has agreed to provide a loan facility to the Company, whereby the Company may borrow up to $5,000,000, with the proceeds to be used for working capital and general corporate purposes. The term of the loan facility is five (5) years, with principal and interest payments being due only at the time of maturity. Under the loan agreement, the Company may borrow in one or more advances, provided however that a minimum amount of $250,000 must be borrowed at any one time and not more than two advances may occur per month. Interest shall accrue at a rate of fourteen percent (14%) per annum, payable upon maturity. As of June 30, 2020, no amounts have been borrowed.

In April of 2020, the Company received $527,360 from the SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program. The receipt is currently reported in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. If the loan is required to be repaid it will be granted a two-year term at 1% interest.

The Company is authorized to issue 20 shares of Series 1 Preferred Shares, all without par value, and each having a stated value of $1,000,000. The Series 1 Preferred Shares do not have voting rights except to the extent required by applicable law and are not convertible into the Company’s common shares. Holders of the Series 1 Preferred Shares will not be entitled to dividends but, in lieu thereof, will receive Net Sales Payments (“Net Sales Payments” is defined as annual payments equal to 9 percent of sales) until such time as the holders have received total Net Sales Payments equal to 9 times the aggregate stated value of the outstanding Series 1 Preferred Shares. The Company will have the right to redeem the outstanding Series 1 Preferred Shares at any time at a redemption price equal to 9 times the aggregate stated value of the Series 1 Preferred Shares outstanding less the aggregate amount of the Net Sales Payments paid (the “Redemption Amount”).

Upon any dissolution, liquidation or winding up, whether voluntary or involuntary, holders of Series 1 Preferred Shares will be entitled to a liquidation preference equal to the stated value of the Series 1 Preferred Shares less the Net Sales Payments paid on the Series 1 Preferred Shares.

In the event of a fundamental transaction (defined to include an amalgamation, merger or other business combination transaction involving our company in which our shareholders do not have the right to cast more than 50% of the votes that may be cast for the election of directors, or a sale, lease or other disposition of the properties and/or assets of our company as an entirety or substantially as an entirety to a third party), the holders of the Series 1 Preferred Shares will be entitled to receive consideration for their Series 1 Preferred Shares equal to a multiple of the stated value of the Series 1 Preferred Shares ranging from 5.0 to 9.0 depending on the timing of the fundamental transaction, subject to a cap equal to the redemption amount. The Company has assessed the likelihood of any Net Sales Payments to the Series 1 Preferred shareholders to be remote.

Issued and outstanding preferred stock:

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares, all without par value.

Issued and outstanding common stock:

The Company raised $2,500,000 in gross proceeds as part of the RDO. The Company recorded $1,705,655 as the value of common shares under common stock and $794,345 as the value of Series A Warrants under additional paid-in-capital in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity.

The direct cash costs related to the issuance of the common shares and warrants issued in February were $348,220. These direct costs were recorded as an offset against the statement of shareholders’ equity with $238,217 being recorded under capital stock and $110,003 being recorded under additional paid-in-capital. The Company also recorded the value of the Series A Placement Agent Warrants in the amount of $52,496 as an offset against the statement of shareholders’ equity with $35,816 being recorded under capital stock and $16,680 being recorded under additional paid-in-capital.

The Company raised $4,000,000 in gross proceeds in the CMPO. The Company recorded $2,942,248 as the value of common shares under common stock and $1,057,752 as the value of Series B Warrants under additional paid-in-capital in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity.

The direct cash costs related to the issuance of the common shares and warrants issued in April were $582,977. These direct costs were recorded as an offset against the statement of shareholders’ equity with $428,283 being recorded under capital stock and $154,694 being recorded under additional paid-in-capital. The Company also recorded the value of the Series B Placement Agent Warrants in the amount of $161,714 as an offset against the statement of shareholders’ equity with $118,951 being recorded under capital stock and $42,763 being recorded under additional paid-in-capital.

The Company raised $19,998,783 in gross proceeds as part of the public offering. The Company recorded $11,336,422 as the value of common shares under common stock, $1,080,289 as the value of the pre-funded warrants and $7,582,072 as the value of Series C Warrants under additional paid-in-capital in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity.

The direct cash costs related to the issuance of the common shares, Series C pre-funded warrants and Series C Warrants issued in May were $1,908,202. These direct costs were recorded as an offset against the statement of shareholders’ equity with $1,088,876 being recorded under capital stock and $819,327 being recorded under additional paid-in-capital.

The Company received cash on Series C Warrant exercises in for 9,770,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.15 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,465,500. The Company issued the shares in the subsequent period.

During the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, nil options were exercised. During the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, nil and 394,735 options were exercised, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company issued 2,000,000 and nil stock options, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company issued 7,056,000 and 5,995,000 stock options, respectively, each option entitling the holder to purchase one common share of the Company.

The continuity of stock options are as follows:

As at June 30, 2020, details of the issued and outstanding stock options were as follows:

The fair value of options granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of options granted using the following assumptions:

The Company recorded $135,844 and $290,866 of stock-based compensation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 (2019 – nil and $2,341,104). For the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 the Company recorded nil cash receipts due to the exercise of options. The Company recorded nil in cash receipts due to the exercise of options during the three months ended June 30, 2019. The Company recorded the cash receipt of $600,000 and reclassified $154,148 of stock-based compensation to common stock due to the exercise of options during the six months ended June 30, 2019.

The Company has estimated its stock option forfeitures to be nil for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 (three and six months ended June 30, 2019 - nil).

14. Warrants

In connection with the February 14, 2020 RDO, the Company issued 20,833,334 five and one half-year Series A Warrants to purchase one common share at an exercise price of $.20. The Company also issued 1,041,667 placement agent warrants to purchase one common share at an exercise price of $0.15 per share.

In connection with the April 9, 2020 CMPO, the Company issued 16,666,667 five-year Series B Warrants to purchase one common share at an exercise price of $0.15. The Company also issued 1,666,667 placement agent warrants to purchase one common at an exercise price of $0.15 per share.

In connection with the May 29, 2020 public offering, the Company issued 133,333,333 two-year Series C Warrants to purchase on share of common stock at an exercise price of $0.15. The Company also issued 12,170,000 Series C pre-funded warrants to purchase common shares at an exercise price of $0.0001 on a cashless exercise basis. As of June 30, 2020, the Series C pre-funded warrants have all been exercised.

As at June 30, 2020, details of the outstanding warrants were as follows:

14. Warrants (continued)

The fair value of warrants issued the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of warrants granted using the following assumptions:

On November 26, 2018, the Company entered into a Development and Supply Agreement and as part of this agreement, the Company has contingent future outflows as follows:

As of June 30, 2020, the first and second milestones have been met and paid. The third milestone was met and paid in April 2020. Per the terms of the agreement the cash option of $3,000,000 was chosen. The fourth milestone payment has not been met.

On May 10, 2018, the Company entered into a Development, Commercialization and Exclusive Distribution Agreement. As part of the agreement, the Company is required to make the following future milestone payments:

As of June 30, 2020, neither of the future development milestones related to the above agreement have been met.

On November 1, 2019, Heska Corporation (“Heska”) filed a complaint for damages and injunctive relief (the “Complaint”) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, Case 1:19-cv-01108-LCB-JLW, against Qorvo US, Inc. (“Qorvo US”), Qorvo Biotechnologies, LLC (“Qorvo Biotech” and, together with Qorvo US, “Qorvo”) and the Company (collectively with Qorvo, the “Defendants”). The Complaint alleges, among other things, that the Defendants improperly obtained Heska’s trade secrets and confidential information and/or conspired to use improper means to misappropriate Heska’s trade secrets related to an instrument and related consumable products for performing immunoassay analysis of biomarkers and other substances. The Complaint seeks compensatory and exemplary damages, as well as preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to prevent the Defendants from commercializing the Company’s TRUFORMATM diagnostic instrument. On January 21, 2020, the Defendants filed a motion seeking dismissal of the Complaint. On February 11, 2020, Heska filed its response to the Defendants’ motion to dismiss to which the Defendants responded on February 25, 2020. The Court has not yet ruled on Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and the litigation remains stayed pending a ruling on that motion. The Company believes that the allegations in the Complaint have no merit and will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition. Under the terms of the Development and Supply Agreement, dated November 26, 2018, by and between Qorvo Biotech and the Company (the “Qorvo Agreement”), Qorvo Biotech agreed to indemnify the Company and certain related parties against claims alleging infringement or misappropriation of third-party intellectual property rights, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. Qorvo Biotech has notified the Company that Qorvo Biotech has assumed the defense of the Complaint and will indemnify the Company for losses arising from the Complaint in accordance with the terms of the Qorvo Agreement. Qorvo Biotech has further advised the Company that it intends to mount a vigorous defense to the claims in the Complaint, and that it believes the allegations contained in the Complaint are without merit.

The Company follows ASC topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of ASC topic 820 apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. ASC topic 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date; and establishes a three level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. Inputs refers broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, the fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The three levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for asset or liabilities.

The categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

An increase/decrease in the volatility would have resulted in an increase/decrease in the fair value of the options.

The carrying values of cash, tax credit and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and shareholder loans payable approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of a financial instrument might be adversely affected by a change in interest rates. The Company does not believe that the results of operations or cash flows would be affected to any significant degree by a sudden change in market interest rates, relative to interest rates on cash and cash equivalents, due to the short-term nature of these balances.

The Company is also exposed to credit risk at period end from the carrying value of its cash. The Company manages this risk by maintaining bank accounts with a Canadian Chartered Bank. The Company’s cash is not subject to any external restrictions.

The Company has balances in Canadian dollars that give rise to exposure to foreign exchange (“FX”) risk relating to the impact of translating certain non-U.S. dollar balance sheet accounts as these statements are presented in U.S. dollars. A strengthening U.S. dollar will lead to a FX loss while a weakening U.S. dollar will lead to a FX gain. For each Canadian dollar balance of $1.0 million, a +/- 10% movement in the Canadian currency held by the Company versus the U.S. dollar would affect the Company’s loss and other comprehensive loss by $0.1 million.

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty raising liquid funds to meet commitments as they fall due. In meeting its liquidity requirements, the Company closely monitors its forecasted cash requirements with expected cash drawdown.

The following are the contractual maturities of the undiscounted cash flows of financial liabilities as at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019:

The Company's operations comprise a single reportable segment engaged in the research, development targeting health and wellness solutions for the companion animal. As the operations comprise a single reportable segment, amounts disclosed in the financial statements for loss for the period, depreciation and total assets also represent segmented amounts. In addition, all of the Company's long-lived assets are in the United States of America (“US”).