AXAS Abraxas Petroleum Corporation (CE)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

1. Basis of Presentation

The accounting policies we follow as of January 1, 2021 are set forth in the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2020 filed with the SEC on May 6, 2021.  The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements have not been audited by our independent registered public accountants. In the opinion of management, these statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations. Any and all adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Although management believes the unaudited interim related disclosures in these condensed consolidated financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual audited consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America  (“GAAP”)  have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. The results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 and the statement of cash flows for the three month period ended March 31, 2021, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

COVID-19

In the first quarter of 2020, a new strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) emerged, creating a global health emergency that has been classified by the World Health Organization as a pandemic. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, consumer demand for both oil and gas decreased as a direct result of travel restrictions placed by governments in an effort to curtail the spread of COVID-19. In addition, in March 2020, members of Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) failed to agree on production levels, which caused an increased supply of oil and gas and led to a substantial decrease in oil prices and an increasingly volatile market. OPEC agreed to cut global petroleum output but did not go far enough to offset the impact of COVID-19 on demand. As a result of this decrease in demand and increase in supply, the price of oil and gas decreased, which has affected our liquidity. While the Company’s  commodity hedges protected its cash flows in 2020 from such price decline, and while prices have slowly risen in recent months, if oil or natural gas prices remain depressed or decline again the Company will be required to record oil and gas property write-downs.

In early March 2020, global oil and natural gas prices declined sharply, have since been volatile, rising in recent months, but  may decline again. The Company expects ongoing oil and gas price volatility over the short term. The full impact of COVID-19 and the decrease in oil prices continues to evolve as of the date of this report. As such, it is uncertain as to the full magnitude that will have on the Company. Management is actively monitoring the global situation and the impact on the Company’s  future operations, financial position and liquidity in fiscal year 2021. In response to the price volatility, the Company has taken action to reduce general and administrative costs, as well as  shutting in production in mid- March 2020, but subsequently started restoring production in mid- June, a majority of such wells were back on production in early September 2020. We have also suspended our capital expenditures indefinitely. 

Going Concern

Our present level of indebtedness and the recent commodity price environment present challenges to our ability to comply with certain covenants in our credit facilities, and under applicable auditing standards, the independent accountants' opinion on our  financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s  ability to continue as a “going concern”    At December 31, 2020, we had a total of $95.0  million outstanding under our First Lien Credit Facility, $112.7 million under our Second Lien Credit Facility, and total indebtedness of  $220.5 million including a $10.0 million exit fee. As of March 31, 2021, we had a total of $89.5  million outstanding under our First Lien Credit Facility, $127.2   million under our Second Lien Credit Facility, including a  $10.0 million exit fee, and total indebtedness of $219.4 million. If interest expense increases as a result of higher interest rates or increased borrowings, more cash flow from operations would be used to meet debt service requirements.

Specifically, with regard to our credit agreements, we did not satisfy the first lien debt to consolidated EBITDAX ratio covenant under our First Lien Credit Facility as of the December 31, 2020 measurement date and such failure represented an event of default under our First Lien Credit Facility. In addition,  we do not anticipate that we will  maintain compliance with the Second Lien Credit Facility total leverage ratio covenant or the minimum asset coverage ratio (as defined in Note 5) both of which will be  first tested as of September 30, 2021, over the next twelve months and, accordingly, the audit report prepared by our auditors with respect to the financial statements in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 included an explanatory paragraph expressing uncertainty as to our ability to continue as a “going concern”.  The inability to maintain compliance with certain covenants of our Second Lien Credit Facility would represent an additional default under our First Lien Credit Facility as of the end of any such future fiscal quarters. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of the “going concern”  uncertainty.

We are evaluating the available financial alternatives and are in discussion with our lenders seeking additional waivers or amendments to the covenants or other provisions of our credit facilities to address any current and future default relating to the covenants in question. The existing defaults at March 31, 2021 were subject to forbearance agreements with our lenders that expired on  May 6, 2021. We are currently in discussions with our lenders regarding further forbearance, but no assurance can be provided that we will be able to enter into any additional forbearance agreements. If, upon a future default, the Company is unable reach an agreement with its lenders or find acceptable alternative financing, the lenders under the Company’s  First Lien Credit Facility  may choose to accelerate repayment. If the Company’s  lenders accelerate the payment of amounts outstanding under its credit facilities, the Company does not currently have sufficient liquidity to repay such indebtedness and would need additional sources of capital to do so. The Company could attempt to obtain additional sources of capital from asset sales, public or private issuances of debt, equity or equity-linked securities, debt for equity swaps, or any combination thereof. However, the Company cannot provide any assurances that it will be successful in obtaining capital from such transactions on acceptable terms, or at all. 

Under applicable accounting principles these circumstances are deemed to create substantial doubt regarding the Company’s  ability to continue as a “going concern”. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a

“going concern”  basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and other commitments in the normal course of business for the twelve-month period following the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements. As such, the accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets and their carrying amount, or the amount and classification of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a “going concern”

.

In April 2021, we received notice that certain of our hedging agreements were being terminated as a result of events of default under the First Lien Credit Facility, and we voluntarily terminated most of our other  hedging arrangements. As a result of the settlement of the terminated hedges, we have outstanding obligations of $9.9 million. These obligations were added to the outstanding balance under our First Lien Credit Facility and will accrue interest at the default interest rate, currently 8.75%,  until repaid. Our remaining  hedging agreements may also be terminated as a result of such events of default. The settlement of terminated hedging agreements may result in losses and limit our ability to reduce exposure to adverse fluctuations in oil and gas prices. See Note 10 “Subsequent Events” for current information regarding non-compliance with certain covenants.

Consolidation Principles

The terms “Abraxas,” “Abraxas Petroleum,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company” refer to Abraxas Petroleum Corporation and all of its subsidiaries, including Raven Drilling, LLC (“Raven Drilling”).

Rig Accounting

In accordance with SEC Regulation S-X, no income is recognized in connection with contractual drilling services performed in connection with properties in which we or our affiliates hold an ownership, or other economic interest. Any income not recognized as a result of this limitation is credited to the full cost pool and recognized through lower amortization as reserves are produced.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Stock-Based Compensation, Option Plans and Warrants

Stock Options

We currently utilize a standard option-pricing model (i.e., Black-Scholes) to measure the fair value of stock options granted to employees and directors.

The following table summarizes our stock-based compensation expense related to stock options for the periods presented: 

The following table summarizes our stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2021, (in thousands):

As of March 31, 2021, there was no unamortized compensation expense related to outstanding stock options.

Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock awards are awards of common stock that are subject to restrictions on transfer and to a risk of forfeiture if the recipient of the award terminates employment with us prior to the lapse of the restrictions. The fair value of such stock was determined using the closing price on the grant date and compensation expense is recorded over the applicable vesting periods.

The following table summarizes our restricted stock activity for the three months ended March 31, 2021: 

The following table summarizes our stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock for the periods presented: 

As of   March 31, 2021, there was approximately $0.4 million of unamortized compensation expense relating to outstanding restricted shares that will be recognized from 2021 through 2022.

Performance Based Restricted Stock

We issue performance-based shares of restricted stock to certain officers and employees under the Abraxas Petroleum Corporation Amended and Restated 2005 Employee Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. The shares will vest in three years from the grant date upon the achievement of performance goals based on our Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) as compared to a peer group of companies. The number of shares which would vest depends upon the rank of our TSR as compared to the peer group at the end of the three-year vesting period and can range from zero percent of the initial grant up to 200% of the initial grant.

The table below provides a summary of Performance Based Restricted Stock as of the date indicated:

Compensation expense associated with the performance based restricted stock is based on the grant date fair value of a single share as determined using a Monte Carlo Simulation model which utilizes a stochastic process to create a range of potential future outcomes given a variety of inputs. As the Compensation Committee intends to settle the performance based restricted stock awards with shares of our common stock, the awards are accounted for as equity awards and the expense is calculated on the grant date assuming a 100% target payout and amortized over the life of the awards.

 The following table summarizes our stock-based compensation expense related to performance based restricted stock for the periods presented: 

As of March 31, 2021, there was approximately $0.3 million of unamortized compensation expense relating to outstanding performance based restricted shares that will be recognized from 2021 through 2022.

Warrants for Common Stock

As of March 31, 2021, outstanding warrants to purchase shares of common stock were as follows:

In connection with the amended Second Lien Credit Agreement, on August 11, 2020, the Company issued a warrant to the lender to purchase a total of 33,445,792 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. As a result of the  October 19, 2020 a reverse stock split of the Company’s  authorized, issued and outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of 1-for-20, thus the warrant was adjusted to provide that the lender may purchase a total of 1,672,290 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share the warrant is  exercisable immediately, in whole or in part, on or before five years from the issuance date. The fair value of the warrant was recorded as debt issuance costs, presented in the consolidated balance sheets as a deduction from the carrying amount of the note payable, and is being amortized over the loan term. 

Oil and Gas Properties

We follow the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties.  Under this method, all direct costs and certain indirect costs associated with the acquisition of properties and successful and unsuccessful exploration and development activities are capitalized. Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of capitalized oil and gas properties and estimated future development costs, excluding unproved properties, are based on the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves.  Net capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, less related deferred taxes, are limited by country, to the lower of unamortized cost or the cost ceiling, defined as the sum of the present value of estimated future net revenues from proved reserves based on unescalated prices discounted at 10%, plus the cost of properties not being amortized, if any, plus the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproved properties included in the costs being amortized, if any, less related income taxes. Costs in excess of the present value of estimated net revenue from proved reserves discounted at 10% are charged to proved property impairment expense.  No gain or loss is recognized upon sale or disposition of oil and gas properties for full cost accounting companies with proceeds accounted for as an adjustment of capitalized cost. An exception to this rule occurs when the adjustment to the full cost pool results in a significant alteration of the relationship between capitalized cost and proved reserves. We apply the full cost ceiling test on a quarterly basis on the date of the latest balance sheet presented. At March 31, 2021 the net capitalized costs of oil and gas properties did not exceed. the cost ceiling of our estimated proved reserves. At March 31, 2020 our net capital cost of oil and gas properties exceeded the cost ceiling of our estimated proved reserves resulting in an impairment of $26.7 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2020.  

Restoration, Removal and Environmental Liabilities

We are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may require us to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the disposal or release of petroleum substances at various sites.  Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future economic benefit.  Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and that have no future economic benefit are expensed.

Liabilities for expenditures of a non-capital nature are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the timing of cash payments for the liability or component is fixed or reliably determinable.

We account for future site restoration obligations based on the guidance of ASC 410 which addresses accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. ASC 410 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset’s retirement obligation be recorded in the period in which it is incurred and the corresponding cost capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its then present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the estimated useful life of the related asset. For all periods presented, we have included estimated future costs of abandonment and dismantlement in our full cost amortization base and amortize these costs as a component of our depletion expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

The following table summarizes our future site restoration obligation transactions for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and the year ended December 31, 2020:

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards 

Effective January 1, 2020, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13 and its related amendments.  This ASU primarily applies to the Company’s  accounts receivable, of which the majority are due within 30 days. The Company monitors the credit quality of its counterparties through review of collections, credit ratings, and other analysis. The Company develops its estimated allowance for credit losses primarily using an aging method and analysis of historical loss rates as well as consideration of current and future conditions that could impact its counterparties’ credit quality and liquidity. The adoption and implementation of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s  financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 840): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting” (“ASU 2020-04”), which provides companies with optional guidance to ease the potential accounting burden associated with transitioning away from reference rates (e.g., London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)) that are expected to be discontinued. ASU 2020-04 allows, among other things, certain contract modifications, such as those within the scope of Topic 470 on debt, to be accounted as a continuation of the existing contract. This ASU was effective upon the issuance and its optional relief can be applied through December 31, 2022. The Company will consider this optional guidance prospectively, if applicable.

In May 2020, the SEC adopted final rules that amend the financial statement requirements for significant business acquisitions and dispositions. Among other changes, the final rules modify the significance tests and improve the disclosure requirements for acquired or to be acquired businesses and related pro forma financial information, the periods those financial statements must cover, and the form and content of the pro forma financial information. The final rules do not modify requirements for the acquisition and disposition of significant amounts of assets that do not constitute a business. The final rules are effective January 1, 2021, but earlier compliance is permitted. The Company will consider these final rules and update its disclosures, as applicable.

2. Reverse Stock Split

On  October 19, 2020, the Company effected a 1-for-20 reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock, $0.01 par value. The Company effected the reverse stock split pursuant to the Company’s filing of a Certificate of Change  with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on September 29, 2020. Under Nevada law, no amendment to the Company’s  Articles of Incorporation was required in connection with the reverse stock split. The Company was authorized to issue 400,000,000 shares of common stock. As a result of the reverse stock split, the Company is authorized to issue 20,000,000 shares of common stock.  As a result of the reverse split, 168,069,305 outstanding shares of the Company’s  common stock were exchanged for approximately 8,403,465 shares of the Company’s  common stock (subject to adjustment due to the effect of rounding fractional shares into whole shares). The reverse stock split did not have any effect on the stated par value of the common stock.   All per share amounts and number of shares in the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes have been retroactively restated to reflect the reverse stock split.

Additionally on October 19, 2020, all options, warrants and other convertible securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior to the reverse stock split will be adjusted by dividing the number of shares of common stock into which the options, warrants and other convertible securities are exercisable or convertible by 20, and multiplying the exercise or conversion price thereof by 20, all in accordance with the terms of the plans, agreements or arrangements governing such options, warrants and other convertible securities and subject to rounding to the nearest whole share.

The common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on the NASDAQ at the market open on October 19, 2020.  The trading symbol for the common stock remains “AXAS”.

.

3. Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Revenue Recognition

Sales of oil, gas and natural gas liquids (“NGL”) are recognized at the point in time when control of the product is transferred to the customer and collectability is reasonably assured. Our contracts’ pricing provisions are tied to a market index, with certain adjustments based on, among other factors, physical location, quality of the oil or gas, and prevailing supply and demand conditions. As a result, the price of the oil, gas and NGL fluctuates to remain competitive with other available oil, gas and NGL supplies in the market. We believe that the pricing provisions of our oil, gas and NGL contracts are customary in the industry.

Oil sales

Our oil sales contracts are generally structured such that we sell our oil production to a purchaser at a contractually specified delivery point at or near the wellhead. The crude oil production is priced on the delivery date based upon prevailing index prices less certain deductions related to oil quality, physical location and transportation costs incurred by the purchaser subsequent to delivery. We recognize revenue when control transfers to the purchaser upon delivery at or near the wellhead at the net price received from the purchaser.

Gas and NGL Sales

Under our gas processing contracts, we deliver wet gas to a midstream processing entity at the wellhead or the inlet of the midstream processing entity’s system. The midstream processing entity processes the natural gas and remits proceeds to us based upon either (i) the resulting sales price of NGL and residue gas received by the midstream processing entity from third party customers, or (ii) the prevailing index prices for NGL and residue gas in the month of delivery to the midstream processing entity. Gathering, processing, transportation and other expenses incurred by the midstream processing entity are typically deducted from the proceeds that we receive.

In these scenarios, we evaluate whether the midstream processing entity is the principal or the agent in the transaction. In our gas purchase contracts, we have concluded that the midstream processing entity is the agent, and thus, the midstream processing entity is our customer. Accordingly, we recognize revenue upon delivery to the midstream processing entity based on the net amount of the proceeds received from the midstream processing entity.

Disaggregation of Revenue

We are focused on the development of oil and natural gas properties primarily located in the following two operating regions in the United States: (i) the Permian/Delaware Basin and (ii) Rocky Mountain. Revenue attributable to each of those regions is disaggregated in the tables below.

Significant Judgments

Principal versus agent

We engage in various types of transactions in which midstream entities process our gas and subsequently market resulting NGL and residue gas to third-party customers on our behalf, such as our percentage-of-proceeds and gas purchase contracts. These types of transactions require judgment to determine whether we are the principal or the agent in the contract and, as a result, whether revenues are recorded gross or net.

Transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations

A significant number of our product sales are short-term in nature with a contract term of one year or less. For those contracts, we have utilized the practical expedient in ASC Topic 606-10-50-14 exempting us from disclosure of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations if the performance obligation is part of a contract that has an original expected duration of one year or less.

For product sales that have a contract term greater than one year, we have utilized the practical expedient in ASC Topic 606-10-50-14(a) which states we are not required to disclose the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations if the variable consideration is allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied performance obligation. Under these sales contracts, each unit of product generally represents a separate performance obligation; therefore, future volumes are wholly unsatisfied, and disclosure of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations is not required.

Contract balances

Under our product sales contracts, we are entitled to payment from purchasers once our performance obligations have been satisfied upon delivery of the product, at which point payment is unconditional. We record invoiced amounts as “Accounts receivable - Oil and gas production sales” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.

To the extent actual volumes and prices of oil and natural gas are unavailable for a given reporting period because of timing or information not received from third parties, the expected sales volumes and prices for those properties are estimated and also recorded as “Accounts receivable - Oil and gas production sales” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In this scenario, payment is also unconditional, as we have satisfied our performance obligations through delivery of the relevant product. As a result, we have concluded that our product sales do not give rise to contract assets or liabilities under ASU 2014-09. At March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, our receivables from contracts with customers were $10.0 million and $8.8 million, respectively.

Prior-period performance obligations

We record revenue in the month production is delivered to the purchaser. However, settlement statements for certain gas and NGL sales may not be received for 30 to 60 days after the date production is delivered, and as a result, we are required to estimate the amount of production that was delivered to the midstream purchaser and the price that will be received for the sale of the product. Additionally, to the extent actual volumes and prices of oil are unavailable for a given reporting period because of timing or information not received from third party purchasers, the expected sales volumes and prices for those barrels of oil are also estimated.

We record the differences between our estimates and the actual amounts received for product sales in the month that payment is received from the purchaser. Any identified differences between our revenue estimates and actual revenue received historically have not been significant. For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, revenue recognized in the reporting period related to performance obligations satisfied in prior reporting periods was not material.

4.  Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the tax rates and laws expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.

For the three months ended March 31, 2021, and 2020, there was no income tax benefit due to net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) and we recorded a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax asset. 

At December 31, 2020, we had, subject to the limitation discussed below, $245.2 million of pre-2018 NOLs and $140.0 million of post 2018 NOL carryforwards for U.S. tax purposes.  Our pre-2018 NOLs will expire in varying amounts from 2022 through 2037, if not utilized. Any NOLs arising in 2018, 2019, and 2020 can generally be carried back five years, carried forward indefinitely and can offset 100% of taxable income for tax years 2020 and up to 80% of future taxable income for tax years after December 31, 2020. Any NOLs arising on or after January 1, 2021 can generally be carried forward indefinitely and can offset up to 80% of future taxable income. The use of our NOLs will be limited if there is an “ownership change” in our common stock, generally a cumulative ownership change exceeding 50% during a three year period, as determined under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. As of March 31, 2021, we have not had an ownership change as defined by Section 382.

Given historical losses, uncertainties exist as to the future utilization of the NOL carryforwards. Therefore, we established a valuation allowance of $117.3 million for deferred tax assets at  December 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, we did not have any accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions. The tax years 2015 through 2020 remain open to examination by the tax jurisdictions to which we are subject.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act  that was enacted March 27, 2020 includes income tax provisions that allow NOLs to be carried back, allows interest expense to be deducted up to a higher percentage of adjusted taxable income, and modifies tax depreciation of qualified improvement property, among other provisions.  These provisions have no material impact on the Company.

5. Long-Term Debt
 

The following sections regarding the First Lien Credit Facility and Second Lien Credit Facility are qualified in their entirety by the disclosure contained in Note 1. Going Concern.  Due to certain covenant violations under our credit facilities as of December 31, 2020, and the potential for future violations, all of the debt related to our credit facilities has been classified as current liabilities.

The following is a description of our debt as of March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 (in thousands):

First Lien Credit Facility

The Company has a senior secured First Lien Credit Facility with Société Générale, as administrative agent and issuing lender, and certain other lenders.  As of March 31, 2021, $89.5 million was outstanding under the First Lien Credit Facility. 

Outstanding amounts under the First Lien Credit Facility accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to (a)(i) for borrowings that we elect to accrue interest at the reference rate  at the greater of (x) the reference rate announced from time to time by Société Générale, (y) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, and (z)  daily one-month LIBOR plus, in each case, 1.5%-2.5%, depending on the utilization of the borrowing base, and (ii) for borrowings that  we elect to accrue interest at the Eurodollar rate, LIBOR plus 2.5%-3.5% depending on the utilization of the borrowing base, and (b) at any time an event of default exists, 3.0% plus the amounts set forth above. At March 31, 2021, the interest rate on the First Lien Credit Facility was approximately 3.6%.

Subject to earlier termination rights and events of default, the stated maturity date of the First Lien Credit Facility is May 16, 2022. Interest is payable quarterly on reference rate advances and not less than quarterly on LIBOR advances. The Company is permitted to terminate the First Lien Credit Facility and is able, from time to time, to permanently reduce the lenders’ aggregate commitment under the First Lien Credit Facility in compliance with certain notice and dollar increment requirements.

Each of the Company’s  subsidiaries has guaranteed our obligations under the First Lien Credit Facility on a senior secured basis. Obligations under the First Lien Credit Facility are secured by a first priority perfected security interest, subject to certain permitted encumbrances, in all of the Company and its subsidiary guarantors’ material property and assets. As of March 31, 2021, the collateral is required to include properties comprising at least 90% of the PV-9 of the Company’s  proven reserves and 95% of the PV-9 of the Company’s  PDP reserves.

Under the amended First Lien Credit Facility, the Company is subject to customary covenants, including financial covenants and reporting covenants. The amendment to the First Lien Credit Facility dated June 25, 2020 (the “1L Amendment”) modified certain provisions of the First Lien Credit Facility, including (i) the addition of monthly mandatory prepayments from excess cash (defined as available cash minus certain cash set-asides and a $3.0 million working capital reserve) with corresponding reductions to the borrowing base; (ii) the elimination of scheduled redeterminations (which were previously made every six months) and interim redeterminations (which were previously made at the request of the lenders no more than once in the six month period between scheduled redeterminations) of the borrowing base; (iii) the replacement of total debt leverage ratio and minimum asset ratio covenants with a first lien debt leverage ratio covenant (comparing the outstanding debt of the First Lien Credit Facility to the consolidated EBITDAX of the Company and requiring that the ratio not exceed 2.75 to 1.00 as of the last day of each fiscal quarter) and a minimum first lien asset coverage ratio covenant (comparing the sum of, without duplication, (A) the PV-15 of producing and developed proven reserves of the Company, (B) the PV-9 of the Company’s  hydrocarbon hedge agreements and (C) the PV-15 of proved reserves of the Company classified as “drilled uncompleted” (up to 20% of the sum of (A), (B) and (C)) to the outstanding debt of the First Lien Credit Facility and requiring that the ratio exceed 1.15 to 1.00 as of the last day of each fiscal quarter ended on or before December 31, 2020, and 1.25 to 1.00 for fiscal quarters ending thereafter); (iv) the elimination of current ratio and interest coverage ratio covenants; (v) additional restrictions on (A) capital expenditures (limiting capital expenditures to $3.0 million in any four fiscal quarter period (commencing with the four fiscal quarter period ended  June 30, 2020 and calculated on an annualized basis for the 1, 2 and 3 quarter periods ended on June 30, 2020, September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2020, respectively, subject to certain exceptions, including capital expenditures financed with the proceeds of newly permitted, structurally subordinated debt and capital expenditures made when (1) the first lien asset coverage ratio is at least 1.60 to 1.00, (2) the Company is in compliance with the first lien leverage ratio, (3) the amounts outstanding under the First Lien Credit Facility are less than $50.0 million, (4) no default exists under the First Lien Credit Facility, and (5) and all representations and warranties in the First Lien Credit Facility and the related credit documents are true and correct in all material respects), (B) outstanding accounts payable (limiting all outstanding and undisputed accounts payable to $7.5 million, undisputed accounts payable outstanding for more than 60 days to $2.0 million and undisputed accounts payable outstanding for more than 90 days to $1.0 million and (C) general and administrative expenses (limiting cash general and administrative expenses the Company may make or become legally obligated to make in any four fiscal quarter period to $9.0 million for the four fiscal quarter period ended  June 30, 2020, $8.25 million for the four fiscal quarter period ended  September 30, 2020, $6.9 million for the four fiscal quarter period ended  December 31, 2020, and $6.5 million for the fiscal quarter from  March 31, 2021 through December 31, 2021 and $5.0 million thereafter; in all cases, general and administrative expense excludes up to $1.0 million in certain legal and professional fees; and (vi) permission for up to an additional $25.0 million in structurally subordinated debt to finance capital expenditures. Under the 1L Amendment, the borrowing base was adjusted to $102.0 million. The borrowing base will be reduced by any mandatory prepayments from excess cash flow (in an amount equal to such prepayment) and upon the disposition of the Company’s oil and gas properties.

As of March 31, 2021, we were not in compliance with the financial covenants under the First Lien Credit Facility, as amended. See Note 10 “Subsequent Events” for details.

The First Lien Credit Facility contains a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to: 

The First Lien Credit Facility also contains customary events of default, including nonpayment of principal or interest, violations of covenants, cross default and cross acceleration to certain other indebtedness, bankruptcy and material judgments and liabilities. 

Events of default have occurred, or are reasonably likely to occur, under the First Lien Credit Facility as a result of (i) our failure to timely deliver audited financial statements without a “going concern” or like qualification for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, (ii) our inability to comply with the first lien debt to consolidated EBITDAX ratio for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2020, (iii) our failure to cause certain deposit accounts to be subject to control agreements in favor of the administrative agent for the First Lien Credit Facility and (iv) certain cross-defaults that have occurred, or may occur, as a result of the events of default under the First Lien Credit Agreement and corresponding cross-defaults under the Second Lien Credit Facility and cross-defaults or similar termination events under our hedging contracts.

Second Lien Credit Facility

On November 13, 2019, we entered into the Term Loan Credit Agreement, with Angelo Gordon Energy Servicer, LLC, as administrative agent, and certain other lenders party thereto, which we refer to as the Second Lien Credit Facility.  The Second Lien Credit Facility was amended on June 25, 2020. The Second Lien Credit Facility has a maximum commitment of $100.0 million. On November 13, 2019, $95.0 million of the net proceeds obtained from the Second Lien Credit Facility were used to permanently reduce the borrowings outstanding on the First Lien Credit Facility.  As of March 31, 2021, the outstanding balance on the Second Lien Credit Facility was $127.2 million, which includes a $10.0 million exit fee. 

The stated maturity date of the Second Lien Credit Facility is November 13, 2022. Prior to the latest amendments of the Second Lien Credit Facility, accrued interest was payable quarterly on reference rate loans and at the end of each three-month interest period on Eurodollar loans. We are permitted to prepay the loans in whole or in part, in compliance with certain notice and dollar increment requirements.

Each of our subsidiaries has guaranteed our obligations under the Second Lien Credit Facility. Obligations under the Second Lien Credit Facility are secured by a first priority perfected security interest, subject to certain permitted liens, including those securing the indebtedness under the First Lien Credit Facility to the extent permitted by the Intercreditor Agreement, of even date with the Second Lien Credit Facility, among us, our subsidiaries, Angelo Gordon Energy Servicer, LLC and Société Générale, in all of our subsidiary guarantors’ material property and assets. As of March 31, 2021, the collateral is required to include properties comprising at least 90% of the PV-9 of the Company’s proven reserves and 95% of the PV-9 of the Company’s PDP reserves. 

Under the amended Second Lien Credit Facility, the Company is subject to customary covenants, including financial covenants and reporting covenants. The amendment to the Second Lien Credit Facility dated June 25, 2020 (the "2L Amendment") modified certain provisions of the Second Lien Credit Facility, including (i) a requirement that, while the obligations under the First Lien Credit Facility are outstanding, scheduled payments of accrued interest under the Second Lien Credit Facility will be paid in the form of capitalized interest; (ii) an increase in the interest rate by 200bps for interest payable in cash and 500bps for interest payable in kind; (iii) modification of the minimum asset ratio covenant to be the sum of, without duplication, (A) the PV-15 of producing and developed proven reserves of the Company, (B) the PV-9 of the Company’s  hydrocarbon hedge agreements and (C) the PV-15 of proved reserves of the Company classified as “drilled uncompleted” (up to 20% of the sum of (A), (B) and (C)) to the total outstanding debt of the Company and requiring that the ratio not exceed 1.45 to 1.00 as of the last day of each fiscal quarter ending between September 30, 2021 to December 31, 2021, and 1.55 to 1.00 for fiscal quarters ending thereafter); (iv) modification of the total leverage ratio covenant to set the first test date to occur on September 30, 2021; (v) modification of the current ratio to eliminate the exclusion of certain valuation accounts associated with hedge contracts from current assets and from current liabilities, (vi) additional restrictions on (A) capital expenditures (limiting capital expenditures to those expenditures set forth in a plan of development approved by Angelo Gordon Energy Servicer, LLC, subject to certain exceptions, including capital expenditures financed with the proceeds of newly permitted, structurally subordinated debt), (B) outstanding accounts payable (limiting all outstanding and undisputed accounts payable to $7.5 million, undisputed accounts payable outstanding for more than 60 days to $2.0 million and undisputed accounts payable outstanding for more than 90 days to $1.0 million and (C) general and administrative expenses (limiting cash general and administrative expenses the Company may make or become legally obligated to make in any four fiscal quarter period to $9.0 million for the four fiscal quarter period ended  June 30, 2020, $8.25 million for the four fiscal quarter period ended  September 30, 2020, $6.5 million for fiscal quarter period from March 31, 2021 through December 31, 2021 and $5.0 million thereafter. 

 As of March 31, 2021, we were not in compliance with the financial covenants under the Second Lien Credit Facility, as amended. See Note 10 “Subsequent Events” for details.

The Second Lien Credit Facility contains a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to:

The Second Lien Credit Facility also contains customary events of default, including nonpayment of principal or interest, violation of covenants, cross default and cross acceleration to certain other indebtedness, bankruptcy and material judgments and liabilities.

Events of default have occurred, or are reasonably likely to occur, under the Second Lien Credit Facility as a result of (i) our failure to timely deliver audited financial statements without a “going concern” or like qualification for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, (ii) our failure to cause certain deposit accounts to be subject to control agreements in favor of the administrative agent for the Second Lien Credit Facility, (iii)  the failure of the Company to meet certain hedging requirements, and (iv) certain cross-defaults that have occurred, or may occur, as a result of the occurrence of events of default under the First Lien Credit Facility and the Second Lien Credit Facility and corresponding cross-defaults or similar termination events under our hedging contracts.

On April 16, 2021, we received a Notice of Default and Reservation of Rights (the “Notice of Default”) from Angelo Gordon stating that we have defaulted under the Second Lien Credit Facility, and that, as a result, the lenders have accelerated our obligations due thereunder and have reserved their rights to pursue additional remedies in the future.

The Notice of Default describes certain events of default that occurred under the Second Lien Credit Facility as a result of (i) our failure to file timely our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, (ii) our failure to timely deliver audited financial statements without a “going concern”  or like qualification for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, and (iii) other defaults under our revolving credit facility.

The Notice of Default declares that our obligations under the Second Lien Credit Facility are immediately due and payable, in each case without presentment, demand, protest or other requirements of any kind, and have begun to bear interest at the rate applicable to such amount under the Second Lien Credit Facility, plus an additional 3%. Additionally, the administrative agent and the lenders have reserved their right to exercise further rights, powers and remedies under the Second Lien Credit Facility, at any time or from time to time, with respect to any of the events of default described above. Angelo Gordon agreed to forbear from exercising remedies available to it until May 6, 2021. We are currently in discussions with Angelo Gordon regarding further forbearance, but no assurance can be provided that we will be able to enter into any additional forbearance agreements.

Real Estate Lien Note

We have a real estate lien note secured by a first lien deed of trust on the property and improvements which serves as our corporate headquarters. The outstanding principal accrues interest at a fixed rate of 4.9%. The note is payable in monthly installments of principal and accrued interest in the amount of $35,672. The maturity date of the note is July 20, 2023. As of  March 31, 2021 and   December 31, 2020,  $2.7  million and $2.8 million, respectively, were outstanding on the note.

6. Earnings per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

Basic earnings per share, excluding any dilutive effects of stock options and unvested restricted stock, is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share is computed similar to basic; however diluted income per share reflects the assumed conversion of all potentially dilutive securities. For the three month period ended March 31, 2021 there were no dilutive potential shares relating to stock options and restricted stock due to our depressed stock price and losses in the period. 

7.  Hedging Program and Derivatives

The derivative contracts we utilize are based on index prices that may and often differ from the actual oil and gas prices realized in our operations.  Our derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting; therefore, fluctuations in the market value of the derivative contracts are recognized in earnings during the current period. There are no netting agreements relating to these derivative contracts and there is no policy to offset. Substantially all of our hedge contracts were terminated subsequent to March 31, 2021, See Note 10 “Subsequent Events”.

.

The following table sets forth the summary position of our derivative contracts as of March 31, 2021:

Substantially all of our hedges were terminated subsequent to March 31, 2021.

The following table illustrates the impact of derivative contracts on our balance sheet:

8. Financial Instruments

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are categorized into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. We are further required to assess the creditworthiness of the counter-party to the derivative contract. The results of the assessment of non-performance risk, based on the counter-party’s credit risk, could result in an adjustment of the carrying value of the derivative instrument. The following tables sets forth information about our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by us to determine such fair value:

As of   March 31, 2021 and  December 31, 2020, our derivative contracts consisted of NYMEX-based fixed price swaps and basis differential swaps. Under fixed price swaps, we receive a fixed price for our production and pay a variable market price to the contract counterparty. Under basis swaps, if the market price is above the fixed price, we pay the counter-party, if the market price is below the fixed price, the counter-party pays us. The NYMEX-based fixed price derivative swaps and basis differential swap contracts are indexed to NYMEX futures contracts, which are actively traded, for the underlying commodity and are commonly used in the energy industry. A number of financial institutions and large energy companies act as counter-parties to these types of derivative contracts. As the fair value of NYMEX-based fixed price swaps are based on a number of inputs, including contractual volumes and prices stated in each derivative contract, current and future NYMEX commodity prices, and quantitative models that are based upon readily observable market parameters that are actively quoted and can be validated through external sources, we have characterized these derivative contracts as Level 2. In order to verify the third party valuation, we enter the various inputs into a model and compare our results to the third party for reasonableness. We did not have any Level 3 contracts at December 31, 2020 or March 31, 2021.

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

Non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis included certain non-financial assets and liabilities as may be acquired in a business combination and thereby measured at fair value and the initial recognition of asset retirement obligations for which fair value is used. Unproved oil and gas properties are assessed periodically, at least annually, to determine whether impairment has occurred. The assessment considers the following factors, among others: intent to drill, remaining lease term, geological and geophysical evaluations, drilling results and activity, the assignment of proved reserves, the economic viability of development if proved reserves were assigned and other current market conditions. During any period in which these factors indicate an impairment, the cumulative drilling costs incurred to date for such property and all or a portion of the associated leasehold costs are transferred to the full cost pool and are then subject to amortization.

The asset retirement obligation estimates are derived from historical costs as well as management’s expectation of future cost environments. As there is no corroborating market activity to support the assumptions used, the Company has designated these liabilities as Level 3. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the Company’s  asset retirement obligation is presented in Note 1.

Other Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of our cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturities and/or liquid nature of these assets and liabilities. The carrying value of our debt approximates fair value as the interest rates are market rates and this debt is considered Level 2.

9. Leases

Nature of Leases

We lease certain real estate, field equipment and other equipment under cancelable and non-cancelable leases to support our operations. A more detailed description of our significant lease types is included below.

Real Estate Leases

We rent a residence in North Dakota from a third party for living accommodations for certain field employees. Our real estate lease is non-cancelable with a term of five years, expiring August 31, 2024. We have concluded our real estate agreements represent operating leases with a lease term that equals the primary non-cancelable contract term. Upon completion of the primary term, both parties have substantive rights to terminate the lease. As a result, enforceable rights and obligations do not exist under the rental agreements subsequent to the primary term.

Field Equipment

We rent various field equipment from third parties in order to facilitate the downstream movement of our production from our drilling operations to market. Our compressor and cooler arrangements are typically structured with a non-cancelable primary term of one  year and continue thereafter on a month-to-month basis subject to termination by either party with thirty days’  notice. These leases are considered short term and  are not capitalized. We have a small number of  compressor leases that are longer than  twelve months. We have concluded that our equipment rental agreements represent operating leases with a lease term that equals the primary non-cancelable contract term. Upon completion of the primary term, both parties have substantive rights to terminate the lease. As a result, enforceable rights and obligations do not exist under the rental agreement subsequent to the primary term. We enter into daywork contracts for drilling rigs with third parties to support our drilling activities. Our drilling rig arrangements are typically structured with a term that is in effect until drilling operations are completed on a contractually specified well or well pad. Upon mutual agreement with the contractor, we typically have the option to extend the contract term for additional wells or well pads by providing thirty days' notice prior to the end of the original contract term. We have concluded that our drilling rig arrangements represent short-term operating leases. The accounting guidance requires us to make an assessment at contract commencement if we are reasonably certain that we will exercise the option to extend the term. Due to the continuously evolving nature of our drilling schedules and the potential volatility in commodity prices in an annual period, our strategy to enter into shorter term drilling rig arrangements allows us the flexibility to respond to changes in our operating and economic environment. We exercise our discretion in choosing to extend or not extend contracts on a rig by rig basis depending on the conditions present at the time the contract expires. At the time of contract commencement, we have determined we cannot conclude with reasonable certainty if we will choose to extend the contract beyond its original term. Pursuant to the full cost method, these costs are capitalized as part of natural gas and oil properties on our balance sheet when paid.

Discount Rate

Our leases typically do not provide an implicit rate. Accordingly, we are required to use our incremental borrowing rate in determining the present value of lease payments based on the information available at commencement date. Our incremental borrowing rate reflects the estimated rate of interest that we would pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. We use the implicit rate in the limited circumstances in which that rate is readily determinable.

Practical Expedients and Accounting Policy Elections

Certain of our lease agreements include lease and non-lease components. For all existing asset classes with multiple component types, we have utilized the practical expedient that exempts us from separating lease components from non-lease components. Accordingly, we account for the lease and non-lease components in an arrangement as a single lease component. In addition, for all of our existing asset classes, we have made an accounting policy election not to apply the lease recognition requirements to our short-term leases (that is, a lease that, at commencement, has a lease term of 12 months or less and does not include an option to purchase the underlying asset that we are reasonably certain to exercise). Accordingly, we recognize lease payments related to our short-term leases in our statement of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term which has not changed from our prior recognition. To the extent that there are variable lease payments, we recognize those payments in our statement of operations in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred. None of our current leases contain variable payments.  Refer to ”Nature of Leases”   above for further information regarding those asset classes that include material short-term leases.

The components of our total lease expense for the three months ended March 31, 2021, the majority of which is included in lease operating expense, are as follows:

Supplemental balance sheet information related to our operating leases is included in the table below:
 

Our weighted average remaining lease term and weighted average discount rate for our operating leases are as follows:

Our lease liabilities with enforceable contract terms that are greater than one year mature as follows:

At March 31, 2021, we had only a lease on a residence and office equipment, with minimum lease payments with commitments that had initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year. 

10.  Subsequent Events

In connection with the completion of our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company tested its financial ratios for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2020 and determined that it was not in compliance the first lien debt to consolidated EBITDAX ratio covenant under the First Lien Credit Facility.  Our failure to comply with such covenant contributed to our independent accountant’s including an explanatory paragraph with regard to the Company’s  ability to continue as a “going concern”  in issuing their opinion on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020.  The "going  concern" opinion resulted in an additional event of default under the First Lien Credit Facility and the Second Lien Credit Facility.  A discussion of the events of default follows.

First Lien Credit Facility

Events of default have occurred, or are reasonably likely to occur, under the First Lien Credit Facility as a result of (i) the Company’s failure to timely deliver audited financial statements without a “going concern” or like qualification for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, (ii) its inability to comply with the first lien debt to consolidated EBITDAX ratio for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2020, (iii) our failure to cause certain deposit accounts to be subject to control agreements in favor of the administrative agent for the First Lien Credit Facility,  and (iv) certain cross-defaults that have occurred, or may occur, as a result of the events of default under the First Lien Credit Agreement and corresponding cross-defaults under the Second Lien Credit Facility and cross-defaults or similar termination events under our hedging contracts.

Second Lien Credit Facility

Events of default have occurred, or are reasonably likely to occur, under the Second Lien Credit Facility as a result of (i) the

Company’s

failure to timely deliver audited financial statements without a “going concern”  or like qualification for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, (ii) its failure to cause certain deposit accounts to be subject to control agreements in favor of the administrative agent for the Second Lien Credit Facility and (iii) the failure of the Company to meet certain hedging requirements, and (iv) certain cross-defaults that have occurred, or may occur, as a result of the occurrence of events of default under the First Lien Credit Facility and corresponding cross-defaults or similar termination events under our hedging contracts.

On April 16, 2021, we received a Notice of Default and Reservation of Rights (the “Notice of Default”) from Angelo Gordon stating that we have defaulted under the Second Lien Credit Facility, and that, as a result, the lenders have accelerated our obligations due thereunder and have reserved their rights to pursue additional remedies in the future.

The Notice of Default describes certain events of default that occurred under the Second Lien Credit Facility as a result of (i) our failure to file timely our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, (ii) our failure to timely deliver audited financial statements without a “going concern” or like qualification for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, and (iii) other defaults under our revolving credit facility.

The Notice of Default declares that our obligations under the Second Lien Credit Facility are immediately due and payable, in each case without presentment, demand, protest or other requirements of any kind, and have begun to bear interest at the rate applicable to such amount under the Second Lien Credit Facility, plus an additional 3%. Additionally, the administrative agent and the lenders have reserved their right to exercise further rights, powers and remedies under the Second Lien Credit Facility, at any time or from time to time, with respect to any of the events of default described above. Angelo Gordon agreed to forbear from exercising remedies available to it until May 6, 2021. We are currently in discussions with Angelo Gordon regarding further forbearance, but no assurance can be provided that we will be able to enter into any additional forbearance agreements.

Hedging Contracts

Effective April 12, 2021, Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. (“Morgan Stanley”), a hedge counterparty to several of our hedging contracts sent us notice of events of default and early termination with respect to the hedging contracts to which they are a counterparty.  The notice indicates Morgan Stanley’s election to exercise termination rights under the hedge contract, which Morgan Stanley asserts have arisen as a result of the occurrence of events of default under the First Lien Credit Facility, of which Morgan Stanley is a lender, holding approximately 3.7% of the outstanding obligations under the First Lien Credit Facility.  The termination value of the hedge contracts with Morgan Stanley as of the effective date of the notice was approximately $9.1 million.  We subsequently voluntarily terminated most of our other hedging arrangements. As a result of the settlement of the terminated hedges, we have outstanding obligations of $9.9 million, including the $9.1 million to Morgan Stanley. These obligations will be added to the outstanding balance of the First Lien Credit Facility and accrue interest at the default rate, currently 8.75%, until repaid. Other hedging agreements may also be terminated as a result of the events of default. The termination of additional hedging contracts may result in losses and limit our ability to reduce exposure to adverse fluctuations in oil and gas prices. Amounts that we may owe as a result of terminated hedging contracts will accrue interest for so long as such amounts remain unpaid.

Forbearance Discussions

The existing events of default under the credit facilities were subject to forbearance agreements with our lenders that expired on May 6, 2021.  We are in current discussions with our lenders regarding further forbearance, but no assurance can be provided that we will be able to enter into any additional forbearance agreements.  We are also currently in discussions with our lenders regarding a waiver of existing and prospective defaults.  No assurances can be provided that any waivers will be obtained.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time, we are involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business. At March 31, 2021, we were not involved in any legal proceedings that are expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.