By Richard Rubin
WASHINGTON -- For Extraco Banks of central Texas, the 2017 tax
law that promised a 20% deduction is turning into something of a
headache.
S-corporation banks such as Extraco technically qualify for the
break. But under proposed IRS regulations, Extraco might lose out,
because it gets too much revenue from managing trusts and selling
mortgages into the secondary market. Those activities may be
ineligible -- and taint the ability of the whole business to
qualify.
"There's a difficult situation placed upon us late in the tax
year that gives us few alternatives to manage around it," said
Chief Financial Officer Gary Miller.
Situations like Extraco's will be a crucial part of an IRS
public hearing Tuesday, as the agency prepares to finish the rules
for the new 20% deduction for pass-through businesses such as
partnerships and S corporations, closely held companies that don't
pay standard corporate taxes. Companies, accountants and the
government are struggling over who is eligible for the tax
break.
In last year's law, Congress created the 20% deduction for
pass-through businesses, which pay taxes through their owners'
individual tax returns. The break shaves their top tax rate from
37% to 29.6%. Lawmakers were trying to cut rates for millions of
closely held businesses like they did for corporations.
But Congress aimed to prevent lawyers, doctors and similar
professionals from turning high-taxed labor income into lower-taxed
business income. It named which specified service businesses are
ineligible, listing industries such as law, medicine, consulting
and athletics.
In those industries, once taxable income hits $157,500 for an
individual or $315,000 for a married couple, the break starts
phasing out.
Congress left part of the problem for the Treasury Department
and the Internal Revenue Service. How much of a specified service
can a business perform before it becomes a specified-service
business? Once a business crosses that level, does it lose the
whole deduction?
Besides banks, insurance brokers worry that consulting services
could make them lose the deduction. Pharmacists offering direct
health care are on the bubble, too. Assisted living centers say
they might provide too much health care to qualify.
"We don't know what direction to go," said Steve Fogg, chief
financial officer of Marquis Companies, which runs 24
long-term-care facilities or similar operations in Oregon, Nevada
and California.
The pleading leaves the government in a pickle. Give companies
what they want and the U.S. could lose more revenue to the
deduction, beyond the $48.6 billion estimated for fiscal 2019.
Tight rules would mean fewer companies qualify for benefits and
encourage economically unproductive tax avoidance.
The IRS proposed a standard to help companies with minimal
service income. For businesses with $25 million or less in revenue,
10% of receipts from specified services is the magic number that
causes them to lose the entire deduction. Above $25 million, the
threshold drops to 5%.
A $30 million manufacturer can get the full deduction, even with
a $1 million consulting arm that helps customers use its products.
Extraco Banks, however, is over the $25 million threshold and says
5.98% of its revenue comes from the services in question, putting
its whole deduction at risk.
The IRS rule can be especially messy for businesses around the
$25 million threshold. Imagine a retailer with $24 million in
revenue and $1.7 million, or 7.1%, from consulting. That retailer
would get the full deduction. If the core business outside of
consulting grew by $2 million, the percentage would decline to
6.5%. But it would tip over the $25 million threshold and could
lose the entire break because of the 5% standard.
"You won't know if you've exceeded that $25 million threshold
until the end of the year, and then it's too late to self-correct,"
said Rick Grafmeyer, a lobbyist at Capitol Tax Partners.
Companies are pressing for leniency in defining a service
business, a higher percentage threshold and leeway in what happens
to businesses that trip over that threshold. Some argue against a
hard cap, so a business that's 25% specified services could lose
part of the break, not the whole thing.
The IRS rules could force companies to account separately for
services that are now commingled so specified-service revenue can
be isolated.
To insulate a core business eligible for the deduction,
companies could put service businesses into entities paying higher
tax rates.
Those separate businesses would need to meet the tax code's
definition of "trade or business," itself the subject of audits,
court fights and fact-dependent disputes.
"We're going to need an understanding of what comprises a trade
or business," said Tony Nitti, an accountant at Withum Smith &
Brown in Aspen, Colo. "We're trying to close one door of questions
but opening two more."
Once the rules are final, the IRS will argue with taxpayers one
at a time.
"It will be hard for the IRS to audit," said Steve Rosenthal,
senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center, a Washington group run by a
former Obama administration official. "If a business is close,
they'll fudge it, and this is a difficult thing for the IRS to
pursue."
Write to Richard Rubin at richard.rubin@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
October 16, 2018 05:44 ET (09:44 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.