By Deepa Seetharaman, Dustin Volz and John D. McKinnon
Even as top executives at Facebook and Twitter attempted to fend
off questions from senators about election interference on their
platforms, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said he plans to gather
state attorneys general this month to examine what the Justice
Department called the intentional "stifling" of voices on social
media.
The department announced the plan as Facebook Inc. Chief
Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg and Twitter Inc. Chief Executive
Jack Dorsey were wrapping up testimony Wednesday morning on efforts
to deter foreign trolls and bots ahead of this year's midterm
contests.
Mr. Dorsey later appeared alone in front of the House Commerce
Committee, where he faced a barrage of questions about alleged
anticonservative bias over how Twitter enforces its rules.
At both hearings, lawmakers quizzed tech executives about how
their sites work, what they are doing to bolster their defenses
against foreign disruption and what regulation the companies might
consider. The questions sharpened the focus on the chasm between
current U.S. regulations of global internet companies and the
far-reaching capabilities the platforms boast in shaping American
news diets and overall discourse.
At multiple points, Mr. Dorsey described Twitter's practice of
waiting for users to flag issues before acting as a shortcoming. He
said his company was working on algorithms to police abuse, which
the company hadn't previously disclosed proactively.
There was no representative of Alphabet Inc.'s Google at
Wednesday's Senate hearing . The company had been invited, but
declined when the committee said its proposed representative wasn't
sufficiently senior in rank. An empty chair next to Facebook's Ms.
Sandberg and Twitter's Mr. Dorsey was adorned with a placard that
simply said "Google."
Technology stocks tumbled across the board Wednesday as Ms.
Sandberg and Mr. Dorsey testified, a selloff that hit not just
social-media titans but also chip makers, software developers and
online streaming services. Facebook fell 2.3% while Twitter sank
6.1%, and Google lost about 1%.
The day's actions produced a split-screen effect: As most
Republicans and Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee
zeroed in on whether the U.S. midterms are sufficiently safeguarded
against Russian interference, the Trump administration and its
allies in Congress doubled down on longstanding complaints that the
platforms are allegedly biased against supporters of President
Trump.
In its statement, Justice Department spokesman Devin O'Malley
said the agency listened "closely" to the morning's testimony. He
said Mr. Sessions has convened a meeting on Sept. 25 with state
attorneys general "to discuss a growing concern that these
companies may be hurting competition and intentionally stifling the
free exchange of ideas on their platforms."
In the Senate hearing, both tech executives expressed contrition
for allowing their platforms to be abused in the past while
pledging to make protecting their systems during the 2018 midterm
elections a priority.
Ms. Sandberg said Facebook has made changes to its platform to
make political ads more transparent and suppress demonstrably false
news. For his part, Mr. Dorsey said Twitter was important to public
discourse as well as the company's commitment to investigating what
type of behavior the platform incentivizes.
The topic of anticonservative bias wasn't a major focus during
the roughly three hours of testimony in the Senate.
The hearings were occasionally interrupted by the presence of
far-right agitators. Alex Jones, the founder of conspiracy site
Infowars, attended the Senate hearing and occasionally filmed the
proceedings, seated behind reporters covering the event. Accounts
operated by Mr. Jones have been briefly suspended by many tech
companies, including Twitter and Facebook.
By the afternoon session in the House Commerce Committee,
allegations of anticonservative bias had taken on a more prominent
role. Many of the Republicans' questions focused on search
restrictions implemented by Twitter that made it harder for a time
for users to access accounts of Reps. Jim Jordan (R., Ohio), Mark
Meadows (R., N.C.) and Matt Gaetz (R., Fla.), among other prominent
Republicans.
"Can you at least see that is a concern a lot of us have?" Rep.
Steve Scalise (R., La.) asked.
Mr. Dorsey replied, "I assure you the algorithm was not written
with that in mind."
The problems resulted from adjustments Twitter made to its
search function aimed at fighting inflammatory, troll-like
behaviors on its platform. Twitter says it quickly fixed the
problem.
Some lawmakers saw the Justice Department statement as an effort
to distract attention from the conversation about Russian election
interference. In a statement, Sen. Mark Warner (D., Va.) said he
agreed that there are "very serious issues related to competition
in the digital economy that are worth taking a look at." But, he
added, he had "serious concerns" that the Justice Department was
relying on the "debunked idea that platforms censor conservative
perspectives."
Rep. John Sarbanes (D., Md.) said he was worried that
Wednesday's House Commerce hearing itself was part of a campaign by
Republicans "to work the refs" ahead of the November midterm
elections and "force an overcorrection" by social-media
companies.
A Justice Department spokesman said alleged stifling of
viewpoints has been a longstanding concern of Mr. Sessions and the
meeting had been in the works before Wednesday morning's hearing.
He declined to say how many states would attend the meeting or
which were invited.
In an interview published Wednesday morning with the Daily
Caller, Mr. Trump accused social-media companies of interfering in
elections in favor of Democrats. "The truth is they were all on
Hillary Clinton's side," he said.
Democrats and some former government officials have accused Mr.
Trump, a Republican, of not taking the threat of election security
seriously enough, due in part to a belief that raising the issue
undermines his 2016 victory. Mr. Trump has repeatedly been
dismissive of the Russian threat and at times indicated he trusts
Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials about election hacking
more than the unanimous assessments of his own U.S. intelligence
community.
Other parts of the Trump administration have dedicated increased
attention and resources to trying to protect the 2018 midterms from
foreign interference.
Speaking across town on Wednesday, Gen. Paul Nakasone, the chief
of U.S. Cyber Command and the National Security Agency, said there
was "nothing more important" at his agencies than the security of
the midterm elections.
April Doss, who served as senior counsel for Senate committee's
Russia investigation until earlier this year, said the Justice
Department statement was "puzzling."
"The hearing's focus was very clearly foreign influence
operations and how it can be manipulated by people who have malign
intent," said Ms. Doss, a partner at the law firm Saul Ewing and a
former National Security Agency lawyer. "The DOJ statement did not
appear to be about that."
--Sadie Gurman contributed to this article.
Write to Deepa Seetharaman at Deepa.Seetharaman@wsj.com and John
D. McKinnon at john.mckinnon@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
September 05, 2018 22:18 ET (02:18 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024