UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

 

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

or

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission File Number 000-52762

 

ABTECH HOLDINGS, INC.

 

 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada   14-1994102
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
4110 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 235    
Scottsdale, Arizona   85251
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

 

(480) 874-4000
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
 

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class   Name of each exchange on which registered
None   None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.001 par value

(Title of class)

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

¨ Yes    x No

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

¨ Yes    x No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x Yes    ¨ No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).       

x Yes    ¨ No

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K.         ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

(Check one):

Large accelerated filer   ¨ Accelerated filer   ¨ Non-accelerated filer   ¨   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company   x Emerging Growth Company   ¨    

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

 

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $1,296,130.

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of March 30, 2018, 504,872,558 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporates by reference information from the definitive Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or on a subsequent amendment to this Annual Report on From 10-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. Exhibits incorporated by reference are referred to under Part IV.

 

 

 

 

 

 

ABTECH HOLDINGS, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

  PART I  
     
ITEM 1. BUSINESS 1
     
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS 19
     
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS 32
     
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES 32
     
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 32
     
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES 33
     
  PART II  
     
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES 34
     
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION 35
     
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 35
     
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK 42
     
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 42
     
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENT WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 42
     
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 42
     
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION 43
     
  PART III  
     
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 43
     
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 43
     
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 43
     
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 43
     
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES 44
     
  PART IV  
     
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 44
     
SIGNATURES 46

 

  i  

 

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve many risks and uncertainties. Reference is made in particular to the description of our plans and objectives for future operations, assumptions underlying such plans and objectives, expectations regarding the acceleration of our indebtedness and other forward-looking statements included in this report. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements. Such statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, including but not limited to terms such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “confident,” “forecast,” “hope,” “likely,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “continue,” “future,” “ongoing,” or similar terms, variations of such terms or the negative of such terms. Such statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Such statements address future events and conditions concerning, among others, capital expenditures, earnings and future financial performance, results of pending and potential future litigation and government investigations, regulatory matters, liquidity and capital resources, growth targets or expectations, market and industry trends and developments, indebtedness, and accounting matters. Some factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated include, among others, future economic conditions, including changes in economic conditions in the markets in which we operate; changes in consumer demand; risks associated with our capital structure, including our ability to access necessary funding or generate sufficient sales growth to generate sufficient operating cash flow to meet our debt service obligations and operating needs; difficulties in successfully executing our growth initiatives; the effects of competition in the markets in which we operate; risks associated with new technologies and our ability to bring such new technologies to market, control of costs and expenses; risks associated with our indebtedness, including our ability to manage liquidity needs and to comply with the terms of our indebtedness; risks associated with the limited trading volume of our common stock; our ability to attract and retain key executives and employees, legislative, regulatory and competitive developments in markets in which we operate; results of pending litigation and present and possible future claims, litigation or enforcement actions or government investigations; and other circumstances and risks affecting anticipated revenues and costs, and the risk factors set forth under “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other risks referenced from time-to-time in our filings with the SEC.

 

YOU SHOULD NOT PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE ON THESE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

The forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions, or otherwise, after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report, including documents referenced by incorporation, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect or hope.

 

  ii  

 

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

 

Overview and Recent Events

 

Abtech Holdings, Inc. (“Abtech Holdings,” the “Company,” “we” or the “registrant”) was incorporated in Nevada on February 13, 2007 under the name “Laural Resources, Inc.” and was initially engaged in the business of acquiring and developing mineral properties. Subsequent to its fiscal year ended May 31, 2010, Laural Resources, Inc. decided to change its business focus to clean technology products and services, specifically in the water clean-up sector. In furtherance of its business objectives, effective June 14, 2010, Laural Resources, Inc. merged with its wholly-owned subsidiary, Abtech Holdings, Inc., for the purpose of effecting a name change to “Abtech Holdings, Inc.” On October 21, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors changed the Company’s fiscal year end from May 31 to December 31.

 

On February 10, 2011, the Company closed a merger transaction with AbTech Industries, Inc. (“AbTech Industries” or “AbTech”), a Delaware corporation, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Abtech Holdings, Abtech Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Abtech Holdings and AbTech Industries (the “Merger”).

 

As a result of the Merger, (i) Abtech Holdings acquired all of the issued and outstanding common stock of AbTech Industries (through a reverse acquisition transaction) in exchange for the common stockholders of AbTech Industries acquiring an approximate 78% ownership interest in Abtech Holdings, (ii) AbTech Industries became a majority-owned subsidiary of Abtech Holdings, and (iii) Abtech Holdings acquired the business and operations of AbTech Industries.

 

AEWS Engineering LLC (“AEWS”), a Delaware Limited Liability Company, was formed on October 31, 2011, as a subsidiary of Abtech Holdings. AEWS operated as an independent civil and environmental engineering firm that provided engineering and technology innovation to the water infrastructure sector. In 2015, the operations of AEWS were transferred to AbTech Industries and AEWS is now dormant.

 

The Company, through its operating subsidiary, AbTech Industries, provides solutions to water contamination issues that are caused by stormwater runoff, industrial processes, water produced in the extractive industries such as oil & gas drilling, and spills of oil-based fluids in marine environments. The Company’s total solutions and systems approach to addressing our customers’ needs results in the Company providing services for the design and selection of water treatment systems, sales of filtration and treatment systems, installation of the treatment technologies, and maintenance of the installed systems. Some of these activities are provided through subcontractors and on some projects the Company may act as a subcontractor to other entities.

 

AbTech Industries has developed a variety of products that leverage its cornerstone filtration media technology called Smart Sponge ® . This patented technology’s oil absorbing capabilities make it highly effective as a filtration media to remove hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water. AbTech Industries is currently manufacturing its products and is marketing them into a variety of markets with thousands of products installed in 46 states within the United States and 15 other countries to date.

 

The Company’s business is subject to several significant risks, any of which could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results, financial condition, and the actual outcome of matters as to which it makes forward-looking statements. See “Risk Factors” at page 19 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and refer to “Forward-Looking Statements” on page ii of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Technologies

 

AbTech Industries maintains a core set of water treatment technologies with applications in all of its market sectors. While the Company has expanded to include a variety of services that are related to its “solutions” approach, it has maintained a strong focus on its heritage as an advanced technology company. Moreover, the Company is able to leverage its core technologies as discriminators to gain entry into markets where otherwise there would be prohibitive barriers to entry.

 

  1  

 

 

Smart Sponge ®

 

AbTech Industries has developed and patented its core Smart Sponge technologies based on a proprietary blend of synthetic polymers aimed at the removal of hydrocarbons and oil derivatives from surface water. Smart Sponge products remove pollutants from water and encapsulate them so that they cannot be released, even under high pressure. The removal process starts with the physical contact between polymer and contaminant and the consequent adsorption (physical interaction, contaminant distributed on surface of adsorbing material) or absorption (contaminant distributed throughout the absorbing material). The absorption/adsorption process is determined by several polymer parameters (e.g., composition and structure, flexibility of the chain and molecular weight), as well as physical parameters (e.g., polymer physical form, contaminant molecule size and temperature). While polymer composition is the critical factor in defining the solubility, the polymer structure (amorphous or crystalline) is probably the most important factor in determining the process of absorption or adsorption.

 

AbTech Industries’ polymers are composed of amorphous products that are able to selectively absorb various hydrocarbons (contaminants) present in water, then stabilize and retain them in a gelified structure. Other traditional sorbent products, with more crystalline structures, can only adsorb the contaminants and don’t have the capability to totally retain them when the sorbent is removed from the water. AbTech Industries’ polymers, in order to selectively remove oil derivatives from water, are oleophilic (strong affinity for oils) and hydrophobic (repel water).

 

The adsorption/absorption process is also controlled by the physical size of the sorbent as diffusion is fairly proportional to the contact surface between fluid and sorbent. Finely powderized materials show the best absorption but, because of swelling, tend to gel quickly and block the contact of additional fluid with the remaining active sorbent, and are very difficult to handle. In order to overcome this problem and use the sorbent to the maximum capacity, AbTech Industries has developed a patented extrusion process that takes advantage of the different thermal behavior of the polymers used to create entanglements with the amorphous part of the other polymer, bonding the chains of the polymers in a flexible porous structure called Smart Sponge.

 

The porosity of the Smart Sponge allows the fluid containing the contaminant to penetrate into its structure, then the polymer chains selectively absorb the hydrocarbon contaminants and stably encapsulate them. Based on the level of contaminant, the entire structure begins to swell (but not collapse into a total gel) while maintaining absorption capabilities well beyond usual levels. Once reaching saturation, the Smart Sponge is easily recoverable and does not leach any of the absorbed contaminant, even in turbulent water or under pressure, giving it less expensive disposal options such as recycling through a waste-to-energy facility. The Smart Sponge can absorb up to 3 times its weight depending on the contaminant absorbed and remains buoyant permitting it to remain in place until fully saturated. The malleable nature of the Smart Sponge material allows it to be formed into a variety of shapes for optimum effectiveness in a wide variety of contaminated water filtration applications.

 

The advantages of Smart Sponge based products over competing products include:

· absorbing rather than adsorbing water-borne hydrocarbons;
· reducing coliform bacteria found in stormwater, industrial wastewater and municipal wastewater (in the case of Smart Sponge Plus, described below);
· locking-up or encapsulating the hydrocarbons;
· transforming the encapsulated pollutant into a solid to prevent leaching;
· remaining buoyant after the encapsulation in order to permit recovery;
· oil-soaked product may be recycled as a waste-to-energy fuel source;
· simpler and less expensive disposal due to classification as a solid “non-hazardous waste”;
· easy deployment and retrieval; and
· possesses the ability to harvest energy from contaminated water thereby creating a sustainable media solution.

 

  2  

 

 

Due to the ability of Smart Sponge to capture and retain hydrocarbons and other contaminants within its highly porous structure, its performance can best be measured by an in-depth look at the spent material to analyze its composition and the quantity of the various contaminants retained. This type of data cannot be gleaned from the customary random sampling events typically used to test filters. Such tests are often misleading or erroneous due to the non-homogenous concentrations of pollutants in stormwater and wastewater. Analyzing all contaminants entrapped in the filter over a period of time provides a better indicator of the filter’s true performance. Consequently, AbTech Industries took a more advanced approach and engaged a highly qualified, analytical laboratory to use complex analytical techniques to deconstruct used Smart Sponge polymer and selectively extract all the entrapped contaminants. This in-depth mapping and finger printing of contaminants (a first of its kind in stormwater treatment) is analogous to having a “Black Box” recording of the Ultra-Urban ® Filter’s (“UUF’s”) filtration mechanisms and all the contaminants collected in the Smart Sponge material during the time that it is deployed. The results of this analysis were then compared to base tests performed on virgin Smart Sponge material. The difference between the two samples constitutes the contaminants collected by the field deployed Smart Sponge. By extrapolating these results, estimations were made of the total contaminants AbTech Industries’ products prevented from being discharged into open waters for entire installation projects such as those at Norwalk, Connecticut. In Norwalk, 275 UUFs using Smart Sponge filtration media were installed in storm drains to protect residential, commercial, waterside, and industrial manufacturing settings which flow into Norwalk Harbor. The deconstruction or meltdown of Smart Sponge media samples documented approximately 50 pounds per filter of total contaminants with the presence of several heavy metals (e.g., copper, titanium, and zinc) and a variety of hydrocarbons (about 32 pounds per filter), including solvents, oils and cosmetic product components as well as chemical plasticizers.

 

The grand total of contaminants including hydrocarbons and heavy metals removed, extrapolated for the 275 filters, is an estimated 13,530 pounds. Essentially, the installation of the filters prevented the equivalent of an oil spill of 1,200 gallons from entering the Long Island Sound. This analysis demonstrated the effectiveness of AbTech Industries’ products with quantifiable data and added substantially to data provided by other tests that merely tested the difference between influents and effluents.

 

Smart Sponge Plus

 

The Company has expanded the original capability of Smart Sponge technology by adding an antimicrobial agent that has proven to be effective in reducing coliform bacteria found in stormwater, industrial wastewater and municipal wastewater while maintaining its oil-absorbing capability. This expanded technology, known as Smart Sponge Plus, provides an effective solution to municipalities and other entities faced with beach closures and other hazards of bacteria-laden stormwater. The presence of bacteria in stormwater is a serious problem and poses significant health risks that increasingly result in the contamination of water bodies. Water quality standards for bacteria counts are very strictly monitored in most coastal areas and small increases in bacteria counts can trigger beach closures. The best potential to reduce this bacteria count during rain events is the control and treatment of the stormwater runoff. This control can be achieved by expensive, complex equipment, such as ultraviolet light or chlorine treatment systems, which become cost prohibitive for most municipalities. AbTech Industries has developed a set of cost-effective systems for retrofit into existing stormwater infrastructure, leveraging the antimicrobial capabilities of Smart Sponge Plus. These systems require no electricity or moving parts and create no downstream toxicity effect (a problem that must be mitigated in alternative chemical treatment approaches).

 

This antimicrobial capability differentiates Smart Sponge Plus products from competitive stormwater treatment devices. It can be engineered to treat massive amounts of water runoff in end-of-pipe applications, such as drainage vaults or other configurations. Because of its antimicrobial properties, Smart Sponge Plus is characterized as a pesticide and is required to be registered with the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”). In July 2010, AbTech Industries received conditional approval of its application to register Smart Sponge Plus as a pesticide under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”). (See “Regulatory” below in this item.) Under the EPA registration, AbTech Industries is allowed to make the claim that Smart Sponge Plus is capable of reducing coliform bacteria found in stormwater, industrial wastewater and municipal wastewater.

 

The technological breakthrough in creating Smart Sponge Plus occurred when AbTech Industries, working with outside vendors, developed the process to bind an antimicrobial agent to its proprietary polymers, thereby modifying their surface and adding micro biostatic features while maintaining their oil absorbing capabilities. This enhanced filtration material provides a significant reduction in coliform bacteria and other pathogens frequently found in stormwater and other water streams. AbTech Industries believes that this breakthrough, coupled with additional advancements that have dramatically increased the antimicrobial strength of Smart Sponge Plus, will be key factors in penetrating the stormwater market. Accordingly, AbTech Industries has been issued three U.S. patents that protect the use of Smart Sponge Plus in stormwater filtration applications.

 

  3  

 

 

The anti-microbial agent used for this innovative technology is an organosilane derivative that is widely used in a variety of fields including medical, consumables, pool equipment and consumer goods. This anti-microbial agent is registered with the EPA for various applications and has been proven successful in those applications against a wide variety of microorganisms. As further discussed under “Regulatory” below in this item, AbTech Industries’ Smart Sponge Plus has received conditional registration approval from the EPA under FIFRA as an antimicrobial pesticide. Smart Sponge Plus will also act as a fungistatic to control fungus and mildew odor.

 

The anti-microbial mechanism of Smart Sponge Plus is based on the agent’s electromagnetic interaction with the microorganism cell membrane, causing the disruption of the cell wall of the microorganism, but no chemical or physical change in the agent. Consequently, the anti-microbial agent is not depleted over time, maintains its long-term effectiveness and unlike any other technology (with the exception of ultra-violet light), doesn’t release any chemical or by-product into the treated water.

 

In manufacturing the Smart Sponge Plus material, the anti-microbial agent is chemically and permanently bound to the polymer surface. In the development process, AbTech Industries has been successful in increasing the amount of anti-microbial agent bound to the polymer thus increasing its antimicrobial potency. In laboratory testing, the current generation of Smart Sponge Plus material has proven to be not only much more effective in destroying bacteria than the original generation of Smart Sponge Plus material, but also capable of reducing bacteria in a much shorter period of time (residence time), a very important factor in filtration applications where the contaminated water is in contact with the Smart Sponge material for just a few minutes versus the hours required in a sanitary sewer system.

 

Ironwood and Smart Sponge HM

 

In 2014, AbTech Industries exclusively licensed a heavy metals removal technology from Synanomet, LLC (“Synanomet”). The technology was developed at the University of Arkansas Little Rock and Synanomet is a company formed primarily for the purposes of commercializing the technology. The technology is a novel carbon-based renewable material with attached nanostructures that are highly effective at removing phosphates, as well as heavy metals such as selenium, chromium, copper, iron, lead and zinc.

 

AbTech is targeting both point and non-point source applications of the technology. Discharge permit requirements for heavy metals are very stringent, typically requiring removal down to the parts per billion level. Many of the heavy metals, like selenium and lead, have well known risks to human health and the environment. These are all heavily regulated contaminants. Phosphorous, a nutrient, which is found in fertilizers, soaps and many day-to-day consumer products increasingly in higher concentrations, make their way into our rivers, lakes and oceans. Phosphorous, when combined with nitrogen, is an optimal food source for algae creating seasonal algae blooms that ultimately lead to “dead zones”. These dead zones are areas where the algae have consumed much of the available oxygen in the water, making the water uninhabitable for other marine species. The USEPA has identified high-priority areas of concern such as the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and the Great Lakes Watershed.

 

The heavy metals media in its raw form is referred to as “Ironwood” and uses a wood substrate and attaches a hematite magnetite nanoparticle, in high density, to the surface of the substrate. This iron-based particle is then able to chelate and adsorb the metal to the surface of the media. The process of chelation and adsorption is very fast, typically a matter of minutes. Metals other than iron may also be adhered to the substrate surface in order to more effectively attract cationic or anionic species of heavy metals. The media can be quickly regenerated through a simple pH adjustment process and then reused. Regeneration in the lab has been done over 100 times with no concomitant reduction in total adsorption capacity. The technology is protected by 13 issued patents.

 

AbTech Industries has also combined the Ironwood media with Smart Sponge, which is referred to as SmartSponge HM, in order to achieve enhanced hydraulic conductivity over the wood-based media alone. AbTech deploys the media both in its virgin Ironwood form and as Smart Sponge HM.

 

  4  

 

 

Smart Sponge versus Commonly Used Non-Advanced Media Filtration

 

AbTech Industries’ core technologies are highly-engineered advanced materials that are chemically selective towards contaminants and, in the case of the antimicrobial material, create biostatic fields to disrupt the cellular membranes of pathogens. These advanced materials enable an entire set of engineered deployment systems that otherwise would be less effective or entirely ineffective using non-advanced materials.

 

Smart Sponge material has a distinct advantage over traditional polypropylene material. In the case of oils and hydrocarbons, once oil comes in contact with the Smart Sponge material it is permanently encapsulated in the structure of the polymer and cannot be released under any amount of pressure. In comparison, polypropylene materials adsorb, or form a temporary attachment to, water as well as oil, thus making them much heavier and messier to remove and causing them to release both water and oil back into the environment.

 

Disposal Options

 

As local conditions, product use and exposure can vary widely, the end user must determine the most appropriate disposal method for spent Smart Sponge materials. Smart Sponge samples saturated with hydrocarbons both in the lab and in the field have been tested according to the EPA’s Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (“TCLP”) by the following independent testing facilities: ABC Laboratories, Inc., Aculabs, Inc. and Turner Laboratories, Inc. These tests show that Smart Sponge is a “non-leaching” product. In addition, used Smart Sponge material can be recycled as an energy source with a British thermal unit, or BTU, value ranging from 10,000 to 18,000 BTU/lb. based on the type of contaminant absorbed. As a result, Smart Sponge technology affords many cost effective and environmentally friendly disposal options. The following waste disposal and resource recovery industries have accepted spent Smart Sponge materials for disposal and/or recycling:

 

On-site Recycling. AbTech Industries has developed a method for recycling spent Smart Sponge and its solidified hydrocarbons, allowing for 100% recycling of the spent-media. This patented process converts solid Smart Sponge media and absorbed hydrocarbons into a liquid that can be sold to a refinery, eliminating disposal costs and generating additional revenue.

 

Waste-to-Energy Facilities (“WTE”). A specialized segment of the solid waste industry has used spent Smart Sponge material as an alternative fuel in the production of electricity. WTE is acknowledged at the federal level as a renewable energy source under the Federal Power Act, Title IV of the Clean Air Act and is a participant in the Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Program.

 

Cement Kilns. This industry has used the spent Smart Sponge material as an alternative fuel in the production process of Portland Cement. This process is considered a beneficial reuse of waste products. The BTU value of spent Smart Sponge material is consistently above the average acceptable levels set for this high temperature process.

 

Landfills. Used Smart Sponge products have been classified as a solid waste and are commonly accepted at Subtitle D Landfills.

 

Engineered Systems and Smart Sponge-based Products Being Sold

 

In conjunction with developing advanced filtration media, AbTech Industries engineers have also developed a variety of deployment systems that can be retrofitted into existing stormwater and wastewater infrastructure. This solves a major problem for municipalities where aging water infrastructure and increasing enforcement of water quality standards (a result of increased awareness of the detrimental environmental and public health effects) pose one of the largest infrastructure challenges in the coming decades. Municipalities have already determined in the vast majority of cases that so-called centralized solutions are cost-prohibitive or infeasible. These solutions include rerouting combined sewer overflow water and/or even stormwater to wastewater treatment plants for purification (which would also require the construction of new or additional sanitation treatment plant capacity) or building large central stormwater/wastewater treatment “tunnels” underneath municipalities. AbTech Industries’ products enable decentralized solutions at the point-of-entry (e.g. stormdrains, etc.) or at the end of stormwater/combined sewer overflow outfall pipes.

 

  5  

 

 

AbTech Industries has engineered a variety of point-of-entry systems that can be dropped into storm drains with little or zero infrastructure disruption and end-of-pipe treatment systems that can be built into the existing water lines to treat the flowing water as it passes through.

 

The products described below incorporate any of the Smart Sponge medias in one or more of their various forms and are each designed to meet specific market challenges. Each of these products is currently being marketed and sold by the Company. We manufacture the Smart Sponge material in our manufacturing facility using polymers procured from the petrochemical industry. We then use this material to complete the final assembly of each product using component parts produced in-house or to our specification by outside vendors. Each product has application in each of the Company’s targeted markets discussed further under “Markets” below in this item, although the UUFs and end-of-pipe systems are designed primarily for stormwater applications and the gravity and vessel filters have primary application in industrial and produced water markets.

 

Smart Sponge Popcorn

 

The Smart Sponge material can be formed into a variety of physical shapes to optimize its performance in a wide range of filtration applications. The Smart Sponge material is the cornerstone of AbTech Industries’ current products, and AbTech Industries continues to find new applications for its use. When produced in its “popcorn” form (clumps of polymer similar in shape to popcorn), Smart Sponge is an effective filtration media due to its high porosity and favorable hydraulic characteristics. The Smart Sponge material can also be sold to OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) and other users to be integrated into many different filtration pressure vessels or gravity flow structures.

 

Ultra-Urban® Filter

 

The UUF with Smart Sponge is an innovative low-cost Best Management Practice (“BMP”) that helps meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) requirements with effective filtration, efficient application, and low maintenance. The UUF is a modular filtration unit (or Catch Basin Insert) designed in a variety of shapes and sizes for use in “curb opening” and “top down” storm drains and is used to treat stormwater runoff for new or retrofitted sites by absorbing oil and grease; adsorbing heavy metals and phosphates; and capturing trash and sediment.

 

The UUF is ideal for municipal, industrial and construction applications ensuring compliance with stormwater regulations. The filter comes in three designs: the Curb Opening, Drain Insert, and Customized Drain Insert. The unique micro porosity of Smart Sponge allows the standard sized CO1414 UUF filter a hydraulic flow rate of more than 200 gallons per minute and has proven effective in removing more than 80% of hydrocarbons and total suspended solids (“TSS”) (300 microns or greater).

 

The unique design of the Curb Opening Series allows crews to easily hang the appropriate number of filters in each drain on a simple mounting bracket. The product is designed with a lateral bypass to utilize each box as well as an overflow capability to eliminate the potential for street flooding in the event of a plugged filter.

 

The UUF Drain Insert Series offers the same filtration characteristics of the Curb Opening series for stormwater filtration of hydrocarbons, trash and sediment. The unique micro porosity of Smart Sponge allows the Drain Insert Series DI2020 UUF to have a hydraulic flow rate of more than 500 gallons per minute, and has proven effective in removing more than 80% of hydrocarbons and TSS (300 microns or greater). These units are designed to be suspended beneath a collar installed under the stormwater grates. This simple design allows easy access for maintenance while eliminating the potential for street flooding in the event of a plugged filter.

 

Customized drain inserts are available for those customers with shallow drains or requiring deeper bed depths. AbTech Industries’ engineers work with customers to understand the site characteristics, including hydraulics and contamination levels in order to confirm the appropriate Smart Sponge bed depth to achieve the project’s filtration goals.

 

  6  

 

 

End-of-Pipe Water Treatment Systems (using advanced filtration media like Smart Sponge)

 

AbTech Industries’ end-of-pipe water treatment systems, which include vaults, horizontal pipe systems and horizontal tank systems, use advanced filtration media such as Smart Paks ® as an effective alternative to treating individual catch basins. These systems, which are typically pre-cast vaults, pipes and tanks, are easily retrofitted into existing stormwater systems and are ideal for stormwater treatment at or near the end of pipe. End-of-pipe system sizes can be adapted for various flow rates and contamination levels to solve a wide range of stormwater treatment issues.

 

AbTech Industries can engineer its end-of-pipe water treatment systems for large projects either as stand-alone applications or as part of a treatment train to polish water working in conjunction with retention ponds or hydrodynamic separators. These engineered solutions can be direct or radial flow, and can easily be adapted to treat the first flush while allowing the later flow of a major storm event to pass around the systems to achieve the hydraulic requirements of the watershed.

 

SMART PAK ®

 

AbTech Industries' Smart Pak is designed for use in new or existing end-of-pipe systems such as vaults. Smart Paks may be specified with Smart Sponge, Smart Sponge Plus or Smart Sponge HM, to target the contaminants of concern such as oil and grease, trash, debris, sediment, heavy metals, phosphorous and coliform bacteria. Smart Paks help users meet and/or exceed stormwater NPDES permit requirements with effective filtration, absorption, life expectancy and maintenance costs. Smart Pak products are constructed out of AbTech Industries' patented Smart Sponge medias which are nonhazardous materials, and can be specified for a variety of applications. AbTech Industries' Smart Pak allows Smart Sponge technology to be scaled to virtually any size required in an easy-to-maintain form.

 

Absorbent Boom and Line Skimmer

 

AbTech Industries' Tubular Absorbent Booms and Line Skimmers employ the Smart Sponge absorptive technology which rejects water while absorbing even sheen levels of hydrocarbons in low energy flow environments. Tubular Absorbent Booms and Line Skimmers are designed to absorb and permanently encapsulate hydrocarbons resulting in no dewatering of oily water during removal. These products remain completely buoyant, even after being saturated, allowing long term deployment and conveniently scheduled removal.

 

Passive Skimmer

 

The Passive Skimmer is designed to absorb and encapsulate hydrocarbons by floating directly on the water in catch basins, sumps, oil/water separators, and marine fueling stations. Passive Skimmers are made with Smart Sponge, are packaged in flexible mesh containers, and are available in a variety of sizes.

 

Bilge Skimmer

 

The Smart Sponge Non-Leaching Bilge Skimmer is engineered and designed for permanently encapsulating the petroleum hydrocarbons that appear as oily sheen in the engine compartment during normal boat operation. The Bilge Skimmer will absorb the contaminant and allow the boater to discharge clean water from the bilge pump.

 

Industrial Process Water Systems

 

For the past several years, AbTech Industries has been working on solutions for the industrial process water and wastewater systems market. These systems utilize a combination of components including pretreatment, membranes and ion exchange to purify makeup water (well or surface) streams for various different plant requirements. Some systems may utilize AbTech’s core Smart Sponge technology in the pretreatment, depending upon the contaminants in the source water. With the recently added focus to the industrial sector, AbTech Industries has added personnel with extensive experience in process water systems. The Company has collaborative relationships with engineering contractors and third party manufacturers to provide the best quality systems for its customers.

 

  7  

 

 

Produced Water Products

 

AbTech Industries has developed de-oiling solutions for the produced water market.  These solutions generally are combined with other treatment systems to address the full range of the problematic contaminants present at a given site. AbTech’s de-oiling solutions are designed to remove hydrocarbons as both a pre-filter to protect the other treatment systems in the treatment train, or as polishing agent at the end of the treatment process. One solution for the removal of free oil in produced water is AbTech Industries’ contactor(s) in a pretreatment position.  These consist of contactor tanks that are sized based on flow rate, influent concentration of contaminant, the desired media change out schedule, and space or size constraints.  The contactors used are widely available vessels, including ASME certified pressure vessels that are filled with loose Smart Sponge popcorn media. These systems can be implemented ranging from 300 to 3,000 gallons per minute. While AbTech Industries has field tested several different configurations of these treatment systems, it has not yet sold any of these systems commercially. Over the past several years, AbTech Industries’ focus has been on a new evaporative technology to treat produced water. It is also experimenting with its heavy metal technology to develop cost effective solutions for the treatment of produced water.

 

Markets

 

AbTech Industries targets three major markets: stormwater/wastewater, industrial wastewater/process water, and produced water applications for the oil & gas industry. The Company’s products also have application in the spill prevention and control markets (including marine environments), although the Company is not currently focused on this market as a priority.

 

Stormwater and Wastewater Market

 

This market consists of municipalities and private sector entities that for regulatory or other reasons are seeking to control the quality of water and other fluids that run off roads and other paved surfaces during wet weather, cleaning or oil spill events. Current customers include municipalities, state agencies, federal agencies, commercial and private developers, industrial facilities and businesses. Stormwater discharges are generated during a rainfall event by runoff from land and impervious areas such as paved streets, parking lots and building rooftops. The runoff water picks up a variety of pollutants, in particular bacteria hydrocarbons and heavy metals in quantities that can adversely affect water quality, and carries those pollutants into nearby rivers, lakes and oceans.

 

· Regulatory Drivers to the Stormwater Market Stormwater discharges are subject to regulation by the EPA, state and local regulatory bodies. Authorized by the Clean Water Act, the NPDES program requires permits for sources that discharge pollutants into bodies of water. Obtaining and complying with NPDES permits requires implementation of stormwater control measures, such as AbTech Industries’ engineered solutions.

 

Regulation of stormwater is a relatively new occurrence. The first phase of the NPDES program was promulgated in 1990, but the permit requirement was limited to only select regulated entities. The second phase of the NPDES program expanded the permit requirement significantly but did not start until 2003.

 

Combined Sewer Overflows also must comply with the Clean Water Act and present an opportunity for AbTech Industries’ engineered treatment solutions. Combined sewer systems serve roughly 772 communities in the United States serving 40 million people. In periods of rainfall or snowmelt, the combined stormwater and wastewater volume in a combined sewer system can exceed the capacity of the sewer system or treatment plant. This leads to the direct discharge of untreated sewage and other pollutants to the environment.

 

Enforcement of stormwater/CSO standards have increased, with EPA compelling installation of stormwater control measures and water quality treatment systems through consent decrees. In recent years, billions of dollars of mandated spending on stormwater/CSO systems has been created through consent decrees.

 

  8  

 

 

· Health and Tourism Concerns Driving the Stormwater Market – One area of the stormwater market that is receiving increased publicity and attention is the water pollution caused by microorganisms (bacteria). Polluted stormwater runoff can expose boaters and swimmers to bacteria, viruses and protozoans. A Southern California epidemiological study revealed that individuals who swim in areas adjacent to flowing storm drain outfalls were 50% more likely to develop a variety of symptoms than those who swim further away from the same drains. These situations are the cause for thousands of beach closings every year, which affect public health and local economies dependent upon tourism and recreation. The Natural Resources Defense Council (“NRDC”) has reported that their research found that the biggest cause of beach closings and advisories is stormwater runoff. According to NRDC’s 2014 Testing the Waters report, in 2012 there were 20,120 days of closings and advisories across the country at ocean, bay and Great Lakes beaches. NRDC reported that more than 80% of the closings and advisories in 2012 were issued because bacteria levels in the beachwater exceeded public health standards, potentially indicating the presence of human or animal waste. This was the eighth time in the prior nine years that the number of beach closing and advisory days exceeded 20,000. Stormwater runoff was reported as the primary known source of known pollution nationwide, consistent with past years, indicating a lack of needed progress on the problem at the national level. NRDC's annual analysis of water quality data at 3,485 coastal U.S. beaches monitored in 2013 found that 10% of all monitoring samples exceeded the EPA's most protective benchmark for assessing swimmer safety, known as the Beach Action Value, or BAV.

 

· Going Green Initiatives Knowing that polluted stormwater runoff is one of the leading causes of water pollution in the country, many companies are including on-site stormwater treatment in their environmental sustainability goals. AbTech Industries’ systems can help companies meet these goals. AbTech Industries’ Smart Sponge technology not only treats polluted water, it is also recyclable, requires no electricity or other power source and can provide users with quantifiable results of its efficacy, thus helping companies demonstrate their “going green” stewardship.

 

Industrial Wastewater and Process WaterMarket

 

The industrial market serves manufacturers seeking to control and clean wastewater generated in various processes. The market is comprised of both heavy industry such as oil refineries, steel mills, chemical plants, pulp and paper plants and more localized concerns such as mid-size manufacturers, refuse sites and shipping/receiving areas. This market also includes private developers, gas stations and owners of developed sites (i.e., parking lots) of over one acre.

 

Companies in the industrial market are placing increased emphasis on water recovery and reuse in order to conserve and protect scarce water resources and the environment. These efforts create the need for effective products and services to treat the water to reduce bacteria and remove unwanted contaminants such as oil derivatives and hydrocarbons.

 

Industrial companies are also required to comply with increasingly stringent discharge regulations, creating the need for products to treat runoff water or discharge water before it leaves an industrial facility. The EPA has classified over 3,000 industrial and electric utility facilities as water pollution dischargers. Each of these facilities provides its own wastewater treatment prior to discharge into an open body of water. The size of many of these plants is equal to or greater than those of many municipalities, and in many instances their processes are more complex than those provided by a municipality because of the nature of the chemical pollutants being treated. The largest industrial user of wastewater treatment processes is the chemical and petrochemical sector. There are more than 12,000 chemical/petrochemical plants in the United States and approximately 90% treat wastewater on-site. In addition, there are approximately 30 to 40 independent industrial off-site plants, most of which handle chemical and petrochemical wastewater, principally from medium-sized and small companies.

 

Within these vertical markets exist opportunities for AbTech Industries, including phosphorus and heavy metals discharge.  Phosphorus is regulated to ultra-low levels to prevent eutrophication in receiving waters such as rivers, lakes, and other large bodies of water. Many industrial plants deploy biological waste treatment to destroy their organic contaminants.  Phosphorus is a nutrient used in this process, and at times carries over into the discharge.  Selenium is another contaminant of concern within several verticals such as mining, power and oil & gas.  Selenium is known to cause problems to aquatic life and is thus being regulated to ultra-low levels.  Other heavy metals such as mercury, copper, cadmium, arsenic, zinc, iron and chromium, have various discharge limits to which AbTech Industries is focusing its efforts to treat with Ironwood or Smart Sponge HM media.

 

  9  

 

 

Produced Water and Frack Water Applications in the Oil & Gas Industry

 

Oil and gas exploration and production activities result in the production of significant volumes of contaminated water. On average, there is five times as much contaminated water generated as oil or gas. Approximately 75% of this water is re-injected into the formation to maintain pressure or deep well re-injected at another site. In a traditional oil production field this water is called “produced water.” In fracking operations this can include “frac flowback water” and in gas fields this could include “gas condensate water.” Approximately 25% of all water generated from the exploration and production activities must be treated for either reuse in operations or for discharge to the environment under an NPDES permit. According to the EPA, the Clean Water Act prohibits the discharge of oil or oily waste into or upon the navigable waters of the United States or the waters of the contiguous zone if such discharge causes a film or sheen upon the surface of the water. Violators are subject to a monetary penalty. The attributes of AbTech Industries’ Smart Sponge technology and its ability to remove “oily sheen” make it especially suited to service this market. Smart Sponge can be used as a pretreatment system to remove diesel range organics and free oils prior to additional treatment by downstream technologies to remove or reduce contaminants such as volatile organic compounds, dissolved solids, bacteria, heavy metals and phosphates.

 

Spill Prevention and Control Market

 

There are a number of applications related to rivers, lakes and oceans that call for the use of floating or in-line filtration products to control and reduce the presence of hydrocarbons in the water or on board transiting vessels. Customers include the cruise ship industry, recreational boaters, marina owners, port authorities, spill response organizations and commercial shippers.

 

This market also comprises airports, airport fueling facilities, U.S. Department of Defense bases, transfer stations, and others concerned about oil spills. Under the Federal Clean Water Act, the EPA has issued the Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (“SPCC”) rule, which requires owners or operators of facilities that store, use, process, transfer, distribute or consume oil and oil products, including airports and military bases, to have minimum preventative systems in place. The risks of not adequately implementing such countermeasures are regulatory violations, fines and potential releases that result in contamination, clean-up and additional fines. The impact of these issues can result in significant costs to a facility owner/operator. There are more than 250 medium and large sized airports in the United States and approximately 300 U.S. military facilities.

 

AbTech Industries’ systems can be deployed for the oil and fuel contamination problems facing airports and military facilities. These systems can not only be used to address such problems as stormwater runoff, but also provide effective SPCC solutions to limit potential liabilities to customers by providing a last line of defense or perimeter protection for fuel spills.

 

Sales, Distribution, and Marketing Support

 

Historically, the Company has generated revenues by selling its products directly to end customers, through distributors in key geographic markets and, in recent years, through alliances to penetrate key market segments such as municipal stormwater, federal facilities and industrial process water. The Company pursued contracts that would enable it to bring its stormwater expertise to all phases of rebuilding projects, including the design, installation and operation of water treatment systems. The Company signed its first contract for such a project with the County of Nassau in October 2013. After more than a year of work on this project which progressed slowly and was hampered by many delays, the contract was suspended by Nassau County in May 2015, following the announcement of the federal investigation of a state senator, Dean Skelos, and his son Adam Skelos, who had acted as a consultant to the Company. As a consequence of the negative publicity for the Company surrounding these events, the Company began to direct a greater portion of its sales efforts towards non-stormwater applications of its products in commercial and industrial markets, while continuing to support stormwater product sales through direct sales staff and through distributors in domestic and international markets. In 2015 and 2016, the Company hired a team of seasoned sales professionals with extensive experience in industrial markets. Through its research and development efforts the Company has made strides to develop new products and refine existing products for these new markets intended to provide effective solutions for the treatment of produced water in the mining and drilling (fracking) industries, filtration of process water used in industrial applications and the filtration of heavy metals from water in a variety of applications. This is a time consuming process that requires significant testing in the lab and in the field to demonstrate efficacy.

 

  10  

 

 

Stormwater and Wastewater Market

 

AbTech Industries’ approach to the stormwater/wastewater market is now focused on product sales in the commercial, industrial and public (municipalities and cities) markets. The Company is primarily using a direct sales approach with its own sales staff to identify and address market opportunities in the United States. It also uses distributors and manufacturer representatives in specific geographic market areas. In markets outside the United States, the Company uses distributors with exclusive and non-exclusive marketing rights in specific geographic areas.

 

Industrial Wastewater Market

 

The industrial wastewater market is focused on the treatment of oily wastewater from industrial processes for either reuse or discharge. This market is serviced by many regional chemical and equipment supply companies that offer a catalog of solutions. Solutions may require little to no individual engineering, up to custom engineered solutions to address a customer need. AbTech Industries services this market by selling direct to industrial customers and providing engineering and sales support services to industrial chemical suppliers, equipment suppliers and consulting engineers. The Company also intends to engage manufacturer’s representatives and distributors to sell the Company’s products in specific markets or for specific applications.

 

Oil & Gas Market

 

Treatment of contaminated produced water for the oil & gas industry focuses on the water produced during oil and gas exploration and production. Oil services companies, oil and gas producers, and engineering firms are the main customers. Applications for this market are generally engineered solutions. AbTech Industries services this market with direct AbTech Industries’ sales representatives and engineering resources, including external engineering design resources when necessary. The Company’s attempts to collaborate with other entities that provide complimentary technologies to meet the specific needs of customers have not been successful to date in part due to economic factors affecting the oil & gas market, which has resulted in the prolonged depression of oil and gas prices. The Company is currently focusing most of its efforts in this market on the development of an evaporative technology which is not yet ready for commercialization.

 

Collaboration With Consulting Firms, Academic Institutions and Public Advocacy Groups

 

AbTech Industries, both on its own, and with its distributors, has been active in seeking out and cooperating with a number of academic institutions and private groups that have interests that may advance the use of AbTech Industries’ products.

 

AbTech Industries’ products have been assessed by several consultants and institutions. The tests performed by these entities, along with the extensive testing completed by the Company, have involved various types of contaminants, contaminant concentrations, flow rates, filter residence times and other factors. These tests, conducted over many years, have led the Company to design its products for the applications where Smart Sponge material performs best and have provided the data needed to validate performance claims for each of the various applications for which such products are currently being marketed. Testing is an ongoing process for the Company as we continue to seek new ways to improve performance and expand efficacy. Consultants used in the past to assess our products include:

 

· Alden Labs . Alden, a recognized leader in the field of research and development, is the oldest continuously operating hydraulic laboratory in the United States and one of the oldest in the world. Alden has completed a variety of tests on AbTech Industries’ SMART PAK for hydraulic conductivity and sediment removal in vault configurations.

 

· North America Science Associates (“NAMSA”) . For over 40 years, NAMSA has been supporting the medical device and pharmaceutical industries through a wide variety of testing services, all designed to ensure safety, efficacy and regulatory compliance. NAMSA has completed extensive lab efficiency tests for Smart Sponge Plus materials using varied concentrations of bacteria and exposure times.

 

  11  

 

 

· Millsaps College . Millsaps is a private liberal arts college located in Jackson, Mississippi. Through the Department of Geology, Millsaps has cooperated with AbTech Industries to test the Smart Sponge’s absorption capability with different hydrocarbons, Smart Sponge porosity and performance claims for the UUF and other products designed for the aviation industry. Millsaps has completed testing for many other large corporations including 3M, Dow, Clorox and Ergon, a local supplier of polypropylene fibers and sorbents for oil spills.

 

· HydroQual Inc . HydroQual (now HDR, Inc.) is an environmental engineering and science firm. With a staff of over 100 employees, HydroQual addresses issues dealing with water quality, TMDL analyses, floatables pollution, water and wastewater treatment. HydroQual has performed a variety of tests to validate AbTech Industries’ claims regarding the performance of the Smart Sponge.

 

· University of California, Los Angeles (“UCLA”) . The UCLA Department of Engineering and Environmental Sciences provided independent validation of early versions of AbTech Industries’ Ultra-Urban Filter.

 

Competition

 

Industrial Markets

 

There are three key areas of industrial focus, which include oil removal, phosphorus and heavy metals reduction and process water systems.

 

1.  Oil Reduction .  AbTech’s Smart Sponge media is designed to be applied in oil and grease polishing applications within the Oil & Gas and Food & Beverage industries.  The competition consists of mechanical removal unit processes like Dissolved Air Flotation and gravity sedimentation, in addition to filtrations systems such as walnut shell filtration, media filters and ultra-filtration.

 

· Walnut Shell Filters : Walnut shell filters are very similar to conventional media filters, except instead of using sand or anthracite media as the filtering media, crushed walnut shells are used as the media. Walnut shells are used because they have a very high affinity for attracting and capturing oil particles. Like conventional media filters, the walnut shells must be backwashed to remove accumulated oil.  Consequently, influent oil concentrations are normally limited to 50 to 100 mg/l to prevent excessive backwashing of the filter media. Due to the walnut shell media’s high affinity for oil, effluent oil concentrations of 5 mg/l or less are common.  While the walnut shell filter can remove some amounts of suspended solids, it is difficult to estimate its efficiency in this area. The walnut shell filter should not be used as a suspended solids removal device.  Smart Sponge’s simple design offers a competitive advantage over walnut shell technology.  The Smart Sponge system does not require backwashing, which saves on capital and operating expenses.  Suppliers of walnut shell filters include Siemens Energy, Enviro-Tech and Filtrasystems.

 

· Media Filters : Media filters, which use sand and/or anthracite media, are primarily used for suspended solids removal and not for oil removal, though some oil removal does occur. Influent oil and suspended solids concentrations are normally limited to 50 mg/l. Based on these influent conditions, effluent oil concentrations of 10 to 20 mg/l are common, with effluent suspended solids concentrations of 5 mg/l or less being common. If oil removal is the primary treatment goal, and effluent oil concentrations less than 20 mg/l are required, it is more prudent to select Smart Sponge, due to its affinity for absorbing oil.  There are many suppliers of media filters including Evoqua, GE, Suez and Veolia.

 

· Ultrafiltration : Like media filters, ultrafilters are primarily designed for removal of suspended solids to extremely low concentrations. While they can provide extremely good oil removal at relatively low influent oil concentration, they should not be used primarily for oil removal due to their relatively high costs. Normally, Smart Sponge can provide effective oil removal to required effluent requirements, at a lower cost than ultrafilters. One variation of the ultrafiltration product line has been specifically designed to remove oil emulsions, like those which may be present in metal finishing wastewaters.  Suppliers of ultrafiltration systems include Pall, Koch and Hydranautics.

 

  12  

 

 

2.  Phosphorus and Metals Reduction .  AbTech’s Ironwood and Smart Sponge HM medias are designed to remove phosphorus and heavy metals in polishing applications within multiple vertical markets.  The competition consists of conventional precipitation followed by gravity sedimentation or media filtration, or ion exchange, adsorptive media, zero valent iron and ultrafiltration.

 

· Ion Exchange : Ion exchange resin is a solution for treatment of heavy metals.  Ion exchange is a reversible chemical reaction wherein an ion from a wastewater solution is exchanged for a similarly charged ion attached to an immobile solid particle. The solid ion exchange particles predominantly used today are synthetically produced organic resins.  An organic ion exchange resin is composed of high molecular weight polyelectrolytes that can exchange their mobile ions for ions of a similar charge from the wastewater.  Each resin has a distinct number of mobile ion sites that set the maximum quantity of exchanges per unit of resin.  When all the sites are used up, the resin exhausts.  Spent resin can be regenerated either at the customer’s site, or a more typical approach is to send the resin offsite for regeneration under a service contract.  Ion exchange can have a high operational cost due to high regeneration frequency and high transportation/regulatory expenses incurred by the service supplier.  Ironwood uses an iron based adsorptive media in a chelating mechanism to remove metals.  Ironwood offers higher removal capacity and longer runs between regenerations.  Furthermore, the regeneration step is simple, using low quantities of chemical and shorter times, allowing the regenerant solution to be recycled to a primary metals precipitation within the customer’s site.   There are numerous wastewater ion exchange systems suppliers, including Prochem, Suez, Evoqua, Wastech and Trinetics.

 

· Adsorptive Media :  There are several adsorptive medias in the market, including both iron and aluminum based materials.  Suppliers of adsorptive media include Mar Systems, Blue Water Technologies and Westech.

 

· Zero Valent Iron :  Zero Valent Iron (“ZVI”), elemental metallic iron, reduces waterborne inorganic ions, releasing soluble Fe(II) in their place, which oxidizes further into Fe(III).  These characteristics allow ZVI to convert oxidized elements, which may be toxic and soluble in water, into immobile solid forms.  ZVI systems are designed to reduce contaminants such as selenium, arsenic, lead and mercury and other pollutants.  ZVI is known to have long retention times (hours) resulting in a large footprint and high initial capital cost (“CAPEX”).  Ironwood is able to achieve comparable results with lower retention times.  Suppliers of ZVI systems are Evoqua, Zero Valent Iron Solutions and Tersus Environmental.

 

· Ultrafiltration :  Ultrafiltration (UF) systems are being used to treat for phosphorus reduction.  Membrane based systems can reduce the total phosphorus to low levels, but soluble ortho-phosphates will pass through the membrane.  UF systems are high in initial capital cost (“CAPEX”) and operating cost (“OPEX”).  Ironwood and Smart Sponge HM reduce phosphorus to ultra-low levels.   The metal nanocomposites in the media have a high capacity for phosphorus removal.  Suppliers of UF membrane systems are “Evoqua, Pall, Koch Membrane Systems and Hydranautics.

 

3.  Process Water Systems .  AbTech provides process water systems as a non-core technology.  There are a number of competitors that supply process water systems.  Requirements of a project usually dictate which competitors will be bidding.  For example, some projects call for an open specification, which allows for the vendor to supply its pre-engineered standard equipment.  This approach keeps the CAPEX lower.  Other projects have specific requirements that must meet the plant’s site specifications.  AbTech can provide both types of solutions for its customers.  Suppliers of process water systems include GE, Evoqua, Veolia, Aquatech, Suez and H2O Innovation.

 

Competitive Position – Industrial

 

AbTech’s competitive strategy is to lead first with its innovative core-technologies, and then sell process water systems to the same customer base.  The medias are promoted specifically as polishers with superior results.  Testing through treatability and/or piloting, provides customers with the confidence to meet their project goals. The market reach is promoted through experienced regional salespersons, manufacturer’s representatives and distributors.  AbTech’s competitive goal is to be a customer centric organization. 

 

  13  

 

 

Stormwater Products

 

Four key factors differentiate AbTech Industries’ stormwater products from other filters in the stormwater market:

 

· Anti-microbial capability . AbTech Industries’ Smart Sponge filtration media, when treated with an anti-microbial agent, can reduce bacteria and other microbes flowing through the filter. Smart Sponge products are available with or without the added anti-microbial agent.

 

· Structural Filter . AbTech Industries’ UUF and end-of-pipe systems are designed so that the entire structure is involved in the filtration process. Most other products have inserted pads or pillows that allow some hydrocarbon removal, but the UUF directs the entire water flow through the filtration media thus enhancing the effectiveness of the filter.

 

· Superior Filtration Media . An essential and superior feature of Smart Sponge filtration medium is its ability to absorb hydrocarbons and prohibit them from being released back into the water flow when there are subsequent rain events. The reason for this is that AbTech Industries’ proprietary blend of polymers is both hydrophobic (repels water) and oleophilic, which means that hydrocarbons are bonded within its chemical matrix and cannot be washed off, squeezed out or leached out of the material during subsequent wetting or rain events. There are various materials used by competitors for stormwater filtration that do not have this absorbent characteristic, instead they feature an adsorbent capability that merely attracts hydrocarbons to their surface area, but cannot prevent them from leaching back into the environment during subsequent rain events. The most commonly used adsorbent in the market is polypropylene, which is currently used in many sorbent products used for oil spill clean-up. Although it is generally accepted that adsorbents are clearly inferior to absorbents in their ability to capture and remove hydrocarbons from stormwater flows, they are widely used because of the low comparative cost. AbTech Industries has performed numerous laboratory and field tests that verify its products’ absorption capabilities and other performance features dealing with the removal of trash, sediment, debris, and other contaminants. Central to these test data is the incontrovertible conclusion that AbTech Industries’ Smart Sponge filtration medium is an absorbent.

 

· Porous Structure . AbTech Industries’ Smart Sponge technology maximizes the effectiveness of the oil-absorbing polymers by forming them into an extremely porous structure that allows effective, long-lasting absorption without clogging or channeling, which is common among filter media in a powder or particulate form.

 

There are three general categories of solutions to deal with the treatment of stormwater: hydrodynamic separators (“HDS”), catch basin inserts and water retention or infiltration systems, also known as green infrastructure. To give a complete competitor profile, a brief explanation of HDS systems is given below as HDS systems are more often considered an alternative to catch basin inserts in new construction projects.

 

· Hydrodynamic Separators . HDS products use gravitational flow to spin the water in such a way that density differences cause sediment and other pollutants to be separated and skimmed-off the water. HDS units are large compared to catch basin inserts (smallest systems are about the size of an automobile) and are comprised of several large chambers or vaults, each designed to trap specific pollutants. These systems are much more expensive than catch basin inserts, but also have the ability to handle more water flow. Unit costs for HDS systems range from $10,000 to $100,000 depending on size. These systems tend to be more cost effective in large new developments where the HDS can be designed into the stormwater system and large areas of run-off can be directed to each unit. In dealing with existing storm drains, HDS products are less desirable because they require streets and sidewalks to be torn-up, drainage redirected, and construction equipment to retrofit the drain and install the units. Catch basin inserts, on the other hand, are relatively easy to install because they fit into existing storm drain catch basins and require little or no construction.

 

  14  

 

 

Not only are HDS systems expensive, they also require significant maintenance to remove the trapped pollutants and ensure that the system continues to function properly. Another limiting factor of HDS systems is that the filtered contaminants, when removed from the HDS, are often considered hazardous waste and must be disposed of accordingly. In addition, HDS systems, while capable of handling large quantities of water, are frequently unable to remove sufficient contaminants from the effluent to meet acceptable discharge limits. Some HDS vendors have purchased AbTech Industries’ Smart Sponge products to be used in conjunction with the HDS units to absorb the oil that is separated from the water, thus enhancing the performance of the systems and reducing the required maintenance. Another drawback of HDS systems is that they are designed to retain standing water after a rain or water flow event. Consequently, the HDS vaults become breeding grounds for mosquitoes (carrier of West Nile Virus), mold, mildew, bacteria and other undesirables.

 

The primary vendors of HDS systems are: ConTech (CDS Technologies, Vortechs), Stormceptor and Baysaver Technologies.

 

· Catch Basin Inserts . Competing products in this category include the following:

 

o “DrainPac” by United Storm Water, Inc.
o “StormBasin” by Fabco Industries
o “Fossil Filter” and “Flow Guard” by Kristar
o “Grate Inlet Skimmer Box” by Suntree Technologies
o “Aqua-Guardian” by AquaShield
o “Inceptor” by Stormdrain Solutions
o “Hydro-Cartridge” by Advanced Aquatic Products
o “Ultra-HydroKleen” by Ultra Tech International

 

· Water retention or infiltration systems . Another solution for the treatment of stormwater is the use of water retention systems and other “Green Infrastructure” solutions that are designed for infiltration of stormwater or redirection of such stormwater to areas where the water can be stored and allowed to naturally percolate into the ground without the use of any filtration technology or treatment system. These systems generally require a relatively large amount of land to be used effectively and therefore are often cost prohibitive or impractical where available land is scarce.

 

Competitive Position – Stormwater

 

AbTech Industries has a strong competitive position in the stormwater marketplace within the United States due to its product offerings. There is significant competition for stormdrain insert filters in the marketplace, though AbTech has a competitive advantage due to the strength of its hydrocarbon absorption technology. This competitive advantage extends to customers such as industrial facilities, marinas/ports, airports, fueling stations, and any area where vehicle maintenance occurs. AbTech has a highly unique antimicrobial technology that requires EPA registration. Since the development of antimicrobial technology is complex, AbTech's approach is patented, and the EPA registration process is extensive and costly, there are high barriers to entry for competitors. This antimicrobial technology has enabled new engineering approaches towards water quality treatment. AbTech faces competitive forces from traditional approaches towards antimicrobial treatment. It is unclear whether AbTech's unique engineering and technology approach will gain significant market penetration.

 

Intellectual Property, Research, and Development

 

Intellectual Property

 

Patents

 

AbTech Industries endeavors to protect the intellectual property it develops through its research and development efforts. The United States Patent Office has issued AbTech Industries and its subsidiary 18 patents related to the Smart Sponge technology and products including a patent issued on March 6, 2018, involving the process to recycle spent Smart Sponge and its solidified hydrocarbons. Additionally, three of the patent applications have been pursued internationally with patents issued in Australia, Canada, China, France, Great Britain, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico and Singapore. AbTech Industries is pursuing patent protection for other technologies that it believes are patentable and intends to pursue patent protection for new patentable technologies that it may develop. AbTech Industries’ success depends, in part, on its ability to maintain trade secrecy protection and operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of third parties. The table below lists the unexpired patents issued to the Company as of December 31, 2017 and their duration. Several of these patents have or will expire in 2018.

 

  15  

 

 

Patent Number   Issue Date   Expiration Date
US Pat. #6,344,519B1   2/5/2002   1/9/2018
US Pat. #6,099,723   8/8/2002   6/5/2018
US Pat. #6,080,307   6/27/2000   9/29/2018
US Pat. #6,106,707   8/22/2000   2/17/2019
US Pat. #6,541,569   4/1/2003   4/7/2018
US Pat. #6,143,172   11/7/2000   1/25/2019
US Pat. #6,231,758   5/15/2001   8/22/2020
US Pat. #6,531,059   3/11/2003   11/3/2020
US Pat. #6,712,976B2   3/30/2004   9/13/2021
US Pat. #6,723,791B2   4/20/2004   12/31/2021
US Pat. #7,094,338B2   8/22/2006   2/21/2023
US Pat #7,048,878B2   5/23/2006   3/24/2023
US Pat. #7,125,823B2   10/4/2006   1/29/2024
US Pat. #7,229,560B2   6/12/2007   12/6/2024
US Pat. #7,229,559B2   6/12/2007   2/27/2024
US Pat. #9,909,069 B2   3/6/2018   11/13/2034
US Pat. #7,066,023B2 (issued to subsidiary – Environmental Security Corporation)   6/27/2006   7/14/2024
Singapore Pat. #66582   6/20/2000   1/9/2018
Singapore Pat. #103019   7/31/2006   9/13/2022
Australia Pat. #732308   7/26/2001   1/9/2018
Australia Pat. #751991   12/19/2002   2/17/2019
Canada Pat. #2,277,163   5/10/2005   1/9/2018
Canada Pat. #2321108   5/26/2009   2/17/2019
Canada Pat. #2460511   11/27/2012   9/13/2022
China Pat. #ZL98801774.1   4/19/2006   1/9/2018
Mexico Pat. #232768   12/05/2005   1/9/2018
Japan Pat. #4470133   3/12/2010   2/17/2019
Italy Pat. #1073610B1   1/4/2009   2/17/2019
EEU Pat. #0973593 (France, Great Britain, Italy)   12/01/2004   1/9/2018
EEU Pat, #1436470   7/3/2013   9/13/2022

 

Trademarks

 

AbTech Industries has registered three trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: (i) Smart Sponge ® , which denotes the Smart Sponge material itself in its various shapes and sizes; (ii) Ultra-Urban ® Filter, which denotes AbTech Industries’ line of storm drain filtration devices; and (iii) SMART PAK ® , which describes Smart Sponge material compacted into blocks, bricks or other pre-shaped forms. AbTech Industries also trademarked, but does not currently use, the name OARS ® , which denotes an oil aquatic recovery system encompassing Smart Sponge products.

 

Trade Secrets

 

In order to protect its trade secrets and un-patented proprietary information arising from its development activities, AbTech Industries requires its employees, consultants and contractors to enter into agreements providing for confidentiality, non-disclosure and Company ownership of any trade secret or other un-patented proprietary information developed by employees, consultants or contractors during their employment or engagement by AbTech Industries. AbTech Industries also requires all potential collaborative partners and distributors to enter into confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements.

 

  16  

 

 

Research and Development

 

The current Smart Sponge technology has prompted the development of a robust line of products. However, to ensure future growth, new products and technologies must be developed. The Company attempts to focus its research and development efforts on projects with reasonable commercial potential, both in terms of revenue and in terms of profit margins, where the resulting products would be inherently differentiated from competing products, if any, or allow AbTech Industries to fill a critical gap in its products offering. In addition, the development time to achieve the new technology or product must be reasonable. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company spent $937,991 and $1,145,950, respectively, on research and development activities, none of which was borne directly by customers.

 

One of AbTech Industries’ most active development programs is focused on the treatment and removal of heavy metals, naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORMs) and phosphates from contaminated water. In 2014, AbTech Industries signed an exclusive license agreement for a highly effective heavy metals removal media that can be used to target heavy metal contamination in the stormwater and mining industries, including removal of selenium VI, a highly toxic heavy metal. This technology can be used in its raw form (referred to as “Ironwood”) or combined with Smart Sponge media to form a Smart Sponge HM product. In 2016, AbTech Industries produced its first batches of the raw Ironwood media at its manufacturing facility in Phoenix, Arizona. In 2017, AbTech Industries installed a more permanent system for manufacturing the Ironwood media in the same facility and continued testing the media in a variety of commercial applications. The Company expects to continue testing the heavy metal technology in various configurations and commercial applications during 2018 and has begun selling Smart Sponge HM products for some applications.

 

AbTech Industries is also involved in the development of an evaporative technology designed to treat produced water, including frac flowback water, on-site by evaporating the water and reducing the volume of water by more than 80%. This solution reduces the volume of water that needs to be trucked to reinjection wells and returns the vast majority of the water, in the form of clean water vapor, back to the environment. The technology uses thin film direct convection in a closed reaction chamber. This thermal process can use as its energy source the flare gas or well head gas available at the oil and gas production site. The technology is designed to be straightforward and robust in order to be reliable under very difficult operating conditions. Unlike AbTech’s other products, this product does not use Smart Sponge in any form. During 2016 and 2017, this technology was improved and refined as it underwent various tests in the lab and in the field. The Company believes that this technology holds great promise and is continuing its development efforts in 2018. However, even at this advanced stage of development, there can be no assurance that a commercially viable product will be available for sale in the near term.

 

AbTech Industries also has ongoing projects to evaluate Smart Sponge and other polymers to determine absorption performance under varying conditions and with a variety of contaminants. This testing not only provides independent verification of product performance but also allows AbTech Industries to provide more reliable information to customers about the product’s performance under various field conditions. In addition, AbTech Industries is evaluating various polymer combinations as the field of polymer science continues to evolve.

 

AbTech Industries’ strategy on all of these projects is to partner with third parties (universities, engineering companies and other commercial partners) for experimentation and validation of proposed concepts. AbTech Industries has worked cooperatively with North Carolina State University, University of North Carolina Coastal Studies Institute, West Virginia University National Environmental Service Center, Millsaps College, California State University at Fullerton, Alden Labs, APEX Laboratories, Brooks Rand, ABC Labs, NAMSA and Hydroqual, Inc. (now HDR, Inc.), on various projects and is looking at other qualified partners for specific projects.

 

Manufacturing and Engineering

 

The polymer raw materials used by the Company to manufacture Smart Sponge are readily available from the petrochemical industry. These polymers are used extensively in other non-related consumer products, road paving materials and various component parts in the auto industry. The Company’s primary suppliers of these polymers are Harwick Standard Distribution Corp., LCY Elastomers, SK Global Chemicals and JS Tech, Ltd. The Company’s supplier of corrugated plastic used in the manufacture of UUFs is Numatech West (KMP) LLC. The antimicrobial agent used by the Company in manufacturing Smart Sponge Plus material was procured from Apollo Chemical Company although no purchases of this material were made in either 2017 or 2016.

 

  17  

 

 

AbTech Industries currently plans to handle the production of its Smart Sponge products at its 13,000 square foot manufacturing facility in Phoenix, Arizona. The Company made its first attempt at manufacturing the Ironwood heavy metal media at its Phoenix facility in 2016 on a relatively small scale with a temporary setup. In 2017 the Company installed equipment and infrastructure to establish a more permanent capability for the production of Ironwood and has conducted trial runs with the newly installed equipment. Currently, the Company intends to outsource the manufacture of its evaporative technology products to an outside vendor. As demand for Smart Sponge products increases, AbTech Industries, while maintaining its core engineering and manufacturing competencies, may begin to develop a manufacturing outsourcing network capable of supplying existing and future products around the world although there are no current plans for such a network. For now, AbTech Industries will fully utilize its internal manufacturing capabilities. While maximizing the capacity of its current facility, AbTech Industries may, in the future, search out and train outsourcing partners in the United States and other regions. As production volumes increase, AbTech Industries intends to further evaluate the value proposition of outsourcing the manufacture of all components and most of the finished products, focusing on total quality and consistency. Due to the very atypical process and equipment used in AbTech Industries’ manufacturing, it is unclear at this time if a suitable manufacturing partner exists.

 

Regulatory

 

In 2009, AbTech Industries filed an application with the EPA for registration of Smart Sponge Plus under FIFRA. In July 2010, AbTech Industries received notice of a time-limited registration under FIFRA from the EPA that contained certain conditions requiring AbTech Industries to submit additional acute aquatic toxicity data regarding the active ingredient in Smart Sponge Plus to the EPA. Subsequently, the EPA granted various extensions of the time-limited registration to December 31, 2014. In December 2014, the Company received notice from the EPA that the conditional registration for its Smart Sponge Plus products was no longer subject to a time limitation and the pending submission of additional data, as required by the EPA’s original time-limited conditional registration approval, will not be required from AbTech until the agency requires all registrants of similar products to submit such data. Under the current registration, the Company is allowed to sell its Smart Sponge Plus products for the intended uses with EPA approved labeling. The EPA registration number for Smart Sponge Plus is 86256-1. The Company has also registered Smart Sponge Plus in many states within the United States of America. In the state of California, the Company’s application for the registration of Smart Sponge Plus has been denied and the Company currently is not able to sell Smart Sponge Plus products in the state of California. While the Company is continuing its efforts to obtain regulatory approval in the state of California, there is no assurance that such approval will be granted.

 

Employees

 

As of March 30, 2018, we had 13 full-time employees and no part-time employees. Six of these individuals are involved in sales and marketing; three in production; one in engineering and three in administrative functions.

 

Where You Can Find More Information

 

We are required to file Annual Reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The public can obtain copies of these materials by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549, by calling the SEC at 1-800-732-0330, or by accessing the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov . Links to these reports can also be found on our website at www.abtechindustries.com, under the INVESTORS section of the website.

 

  18  

 

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

 

Our business and an investment in our common stock is subject to a variety of risks. The following risk factors describe the most significant events, facts or circumstances that could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operations, ability to implement our business plan and the market price for our common stock. Many of these events are outside of our control. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and investors in our common stock could lose all or part of their investment. Other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K include additional factors that could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, we operate in a rapidly changing environment. Other known risks that we currently believe to be immaterial could become material in the future. We are also subject to legal and regulatory changes. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible to predict the impact of all these factors on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As used in this “Risk Factors” section, the terms “Company,” “we,” our” and like words mean Abtech Holdings together with Abtech Industries, unless the context otherwise requires.

 

Risks Relating to Our Business

 

Our ability to generate revenue to support our operations is uncertain.

 

We are in the early growth stage of our business and have a limited history of generating revenues. We have a limited operating history upon which you can evaluate our potential for future success, and we are subject to the additional risks affecting early-stage businesses. Rather than relying on historical information, financial or otherwise, to evaluate our Company, you should evaluate our Company in light of your assessment of the growth potential of our business and the expenses, delays, uncertainties, and complications typically encountered by early-stage businesses, many of which will be beyond our control. Early-stage businesses in rapidly evolving markets commonly face risks, such as the following:

 

· unanticipated problems, delays, and expenses relating to the development and implementation of their business plans;

 

· operational difficulties;

 

· lack of sufficient capital;

 

· competition from more advanced enterprises; and

 

· uncertain revenue generation.

 

Our limited operating history may make it difficult for us to forecast accurately our operating results.

 

Our planned expense levels are, and will continue to be, based in part on our expectations, which are difficult to forecast accurately based on our stage of development and factors outside of our control. We may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected developments. Further, business development expenses may increase significantly as we expand operations. To the extent that any unexpected expenses precede, or are not rapidly followed by, a corresponding increase in revenue, our business, operating results, and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

 

We have a history of losses that may continue, which may negatively impact our ability to achieve our business objectives.

 

We have incurred net losses since our inception. The Company had a net loss of approximately $4.3 million during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. We cannot assure you that we can achieve or sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. There can be no assurance that future operations will be profitable. We may not achieve our business objectives and the failure to achieve such goals would have an adverse impact on us.

 

  19  

 

 

Our success depends on our ability to expand, operate, and manage successfully our operations.

 

Our success depends on our ability to expand, operate, and manage successfully our operations. Our ability to expand successfully will depend upon a number of factors, including the following:

 

· signing with strategic partners, dominant in their field;

 

· the continued development of our business;

 

· the hiring, training, and retention of additional personnel;

 

· the ability to enhance our operational, financial, and management systems;

 

· the availability of adequate financing;

 

· competitive factors;

 

· general economic and business conditions; and

 

· the ability to implement methods for revenue generation.

 

If we are unable to obtain additional capital, our business operations could be harmed.

 

The development and expansion of our business will require additional funds. In the future, we may seek additional equity or debt financing to provide capital for our Company. Such financing may not be available or may not be available on satisfactory terms. If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to expand our operations. While debt financing will enable us to expand our business more rapidly than we otherwise would be able to do, debt financing increases expenses and we must repay the debt regardless of our operating results. Our inability or failure to timely repay such indebtedness could cause significant harm to our financial position and harm our business and operations. Future equity financings could result in dilution to our stockholders.

 

The most recent global financial crisis, which has included, among other things, significant reductions in available capital and liquidity from banks and other providers of credit, substantial reductions or fluctuations in equity and currency values worldwide, and concerns that similar crisis may occur in the future, may make it difficult for us to raise additional capital or obtain additional credit, when needed, on acceptable terms or at all.

 

Our inability to obtain adequate capital resources, whether in the form of equity or debt, to fund our business and growth strategies, may require us to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of our operations, which may adversely affect our financial results and ability to operate as a going concern.

 

You may suffer significant dilution if we raise additional capital.

 

If we raise additional capital, we expect it will be necessary for us to issue additional equity or convertible debt securities. If we issue equity or convertible debt securities, the price at which we offer such securities may not bear any relationship to our value, the net tangible book value per share may decrease, the percentage ownership of our current stockholders would be diluted, and any equity securities we may issue in such offering or upon conversion of convertible debt securities issued in such offering, may have rights, preferences, or privileges with respect to liquidation, dividends, redemption, voting, and other matters that are senior to or more advantageous than our common stock.

 

We have completed debt financings and face risks associated with financing our operations.

 

The Company has completed several debt financings and is subject to the normal risks associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest and the risk that we will not be able to renew, repay, or refinance our debt when it matures or that the terms of any renewal or refinancing will not be as favorable as the existing terms of that debt. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had $1 million of outstanding indebtedness under three promissory notes payable. In March 2017, the debt holder and the Company mutually agreed to extend the maturity dates of these notes to April 30, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, this $1 million of outstanding debt was in technical default because it had not been extended or repaid as of its maturity date. In addition, the Company had $45,546 of additional outstanding debt that matures in 2018, other debt of $7,413,000 with no specific due date which may become due in 2018, and accrued interest payable of $1,005,983. Our level of indebtedness may restrict our operations now or in the future.

 

  20  

 

 

We are presently in technical default under three promissory notes for not repaying the obligations owed thereunder prior to maturity. Should the holders of such notes pursue collection or any other remedies to which they are entitled, this would be expected to have a material adverse effect on our operations.

 

As of December 31, 2017, we were in default under three promissory notes payable with an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 outstanding for failure to repay the obligations thereunder prior to maturity. We currently do not have sufficient liquidity, including cash on hand, to repay this indebtedness. While the Company does not expect the noteholder to accelerate the indebtedness, the noteholder may do so at any time, or may initiate foreclosure actions, or seek any other remedies permitted by the terms of the notes and applicable law. There can be no assurances that the noteholder will not accelerate. We are currently in discussions to extend the maturity date and have the event of default waived; however, there can be no assurances that such discussions will be successful. Should the debtholder seek to accelerate the indebtedness, the Company could be required to discontinue or significantly reduce the scope of its operations if no other means of financing or refinancing are available. Such acceleration of the indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.

 

We have debt outstanding that is secured by all of the assets of the Company.

 

During 2014 and 2015, we issued promissory notes that were secured by all of the assets of the Company, including its intellectual property. As of December 31, 2017, two secured promissory notes, having a senior security interest in the assets of the Company and an aggregate principal amount of $294,546, were outstanding. If we are unable to pay our obligations to our secured lenders, they could proceed against any or all of the collateral securing our indebtedness to them which could prevent the Company from continuing its operations in whole or in part.

 

You may suffer dilution if the secured notes are converted to common stock.

 

As of December 31, 2017, the Company had $794,546 of convertible notes outstanding that, if converted, would require the company to issue approximately 3.1 million shares of common stock. In addition, the Company may offer more favorable conversion terms to the holders of the convertible notes if it determines that the conversion of such notes on the more favorable terms is in the best interest of the Company. Such conversion would cause the percentage ownership of our current stockholders to be diluted.

 

We have other debt outstanding that may eventually be converted to common stock.

 

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company received cash advances totaling $7,413,000 from related party stockholders holding more than 5% of our shares of outstanding common stock. The Company may offer these debt holders the option to convert their debt to common stock in the future if the Company is unable to repay the debt or if it determines that the conversion of such debt will be in the best interest of the Company. Such conversion would cause the percentage ownership of our current stockholders to be diluted and may depress the market price of our common stock.

 

Our independent auditors have expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, which may hinder our ability to obtain future financing.

 

In their report dated April 3, 2018, our independent registered public accounting firm included an emphasis-of-matter paragraph with respect to our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 concerning the Company’s assumption that it will continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is an issue raised as a result of recurring losses from operations. To date, each of Abtech Holdings and AbTech Industries has only incurred net operating losses resulting in a significant accumulated deficit. Our ability to continue as a going concern is subject to our ability to obtain necessary funding from outside sources, including obtaining additional funding from the sale of our securities, and to generate revenue from our operations. Our continued net operating losses increase the difficulty in meeting such goals and there can be no assurances that such methods will prove successful. The Company plans to raise additional capital in the near term and is currently considering the various options available for raising such capital.

 

  21  

 

 

We depend on our officers and key employees who would be difficult to replace, and our business will likely be harmed if we lose their services or cannot hire additional qualified personnel.

 

Our success depends substantially on the efforts and abilities of our officers and other key employees. AbTech Industries has employment agreements with its chief executive officer and its chief financial officer, and certain key employees, but we do not think those agreements limit any employee’s ability to terminate his or her employment. We have key person life insurance on Glenn R. Rink, our president, chief executive officer and a director, but we do not have key person life insurance covering any of our other officers or other key employees. The loss of services of one or more of our officers or key employees or the inability to add key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business. Competition for experienced personnel in our industry is substantial. Our success depends in part on our ability to attract, hire, and retain qualified personnel. In addition, if any of our officers or other key employees join a competitor or form a competing company, we may lose some of our customers.

 

We depend on the recruitment and retention of qualified personnel, and our failure to attract and retain such personnel could seriously harm our business.

 

Due to the specialized nature of our business, our future performance is highly dependent upon the continued services of current and future key personnel and managers. Our future business depends upon our ability to attract and retain qualified engineering, manufacturing, marketing, sales, and management personnel for our operations. We may also have to compete with the other companies in our industry in the recruitment and retention of qualified managerial and technical employees. Competition for personnel is intense and confidentiality and non-compete agreements may restrict our ability to hire individuals employed by other companies. Therefore, we may not be successful in attracting or retaining qualified personnel. Our failure to attract and retain qualified personnel could seriously harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Furthermore, we may not be able to accurately forecast our needs for additional personnel, which could adversely affect our ability to grow.

 

The effects of the most recent global economic downturn may continue to have an adverse impact on our business, operating results, or financial condition.

 

The most recent global economic downturn caused disruptions and volatility in global financial markets and increased rates of default and bankruptcy and has impacted levels of consumer and commercial spending. While the global economy is recovering, we are unable to predict the duration, severity or pace of recovery of the global economic and financial crisis, or the long-term effects it will have on our business. There can be no assurance that any actions we may take in response to any future deterioration in general economic and financial conditions will be sufficient. A protracted continuation or worsening of global economic conditions or disruptions in the financial markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

 

If we do not achieve broad market acceptance of our products and services, we may not be successful.

 

Although we believe our products and services will serve existing needs in the markets in which we operate, our delivery of these products and services is unique and subject to broad market acceptance. As is typical of any new product or service, the demand for and market acceptance of these products and services are highly uncertain. We cannot assure you that any of our products and services will be commercialized on a widespread basis. The commercial acceptance of our products and services may be affected by a number of factors, including the willingness of municipalities and other commercial and industrial entities to use our products and services to control the quality of water and other fluids. If the markets for our products and services fail to develop on a meaningful basis, if they develop more slowly than we anticipate, or if our products and services fail to achieve sufficient market acceptance, our business and future results of operations could be adversely affected.

 

  22  

 

 

Because our products may be designed to provide a solution which competes with existing methods, we are likely to face resistance to change, which could impede our ability to commercialize our business.

 

Our products are designed to provide a solution to environmental challenges created by contaminated water and other fluids. Currently, large and well capitalized companies provide services in these areas. These competitors have strong relationships with their customers’ personnel, and there is a natural reluctance for businesses to change to new technologies, particularly in such industries as the oil and gas industries where our future products may be relevant. This reluctance is increased when potential customers make significant capital investments in competing technologies. Because of these obstacles, we may face substantial barriers to commercializing our business.

 

If we experience rapid growth and we are not able to manage our growth successfully, our inability to manage the growth could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

Rapid growth places a significant strain on financial, operational, and managerial resources. While we engage in strategic and operational planning to adequately manage anticipated growth, there can be no assurance that we will be able to implement and subsequently improve operations and financial systems successfully and in a timely manner to fully manage our growth. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage our growth and any inability to successfully manage growth could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operation.

 

We have no experience in manufacturing or assembling products on a large scale basis and, if we do not develop adequate manufacturing and assembly processes and capabilities to do so in a timely manner, we may be unable to achieve our growth and profitability objectives.

 

We have no experience manufacturing or assembling products on a large scale. We do not know whether our current or future manufacturing arrangements will be able to develop efficient, low-cost manufacturing capabilities and processes that will enable us to meet the quality, price, engineering, design and production standards, or production volumes required to successfully mass market such products. Even if we are successful in developing manufacturing capabilities and processes, we do not know whether we will do so in time to meet our product commercialization schedule or to satisfy the requirements of our target market. Our failure to develop these manufacturing processes and capabilities, if necessary, in a timely manner, could prevent us from achieving our growth and profitability objectives.

 

If we fail to continue to develop or acquire new products, adapt to rapid and significant technological change, and respond to introductions of new products, we will not be competitive.

 

Our growth strategy includes significant investment in and expenditures for product development. We intend to sell products, primarily in the water clean-up sector, which are characterized by rapid and significant technological changes, frequent new product and service introductions, and enhancements and evolving industry standards. Without the timely introduction of new products, services, and enhancements, our products and services may become technologically obsolete over time, in which case our revenue and operating results would suffer.

 

In addition, our competitors may adapt more quickly to new technologies and changes in customers’ requirements than we can. The products that we are currently developing or those that we will develop in the future may not be technologically feasible or accepted by the marketplace, and our products or technologies could become uncompetitive or obsolete.

 

The market for our products is highly competitive, and there can be no assurance that competitors will not emerge with comparable products or technologies.

 

The markets for our products and services are expected to remain highly competitive. While we believe our products are unique and have some patent protection for the underlying technologies, or unique trade secrets, there can be no assurance that competitors will not emerge with comparable products or technologies. There are a number of large companies involved in the same businesses as us, but with larger more established sales and marketing organizations, technical staff, and financial resources. We may establish marketing and distribution partnerships or alliances with some of these companies, but there can be no assurance that such alliances will be formed.

 

  23  

 

 

Our business may become substantially dependent on contracts that are awarded through competitive bidding processes.

 

We may sell a significant portion of our products pursuant to contracts that are subject to competitive bidding, including contracts with municipal authorities. Competition for, and the negotiation and award of, contracts present varied risks, including, but not limited to:

 

· investment of substantial time and resources by management for the preparation of bids and proposals with no assurance that a contract will be awarded to us;

 

· the requirement to certify as to compliance with numerous laws (for example, socio-economic, small business, and domestic preference) for which a false or incorrect certification can lead to civil and criminal penalties;

 

· the need to estimate accurately the resources and cost structure required to service a contract; and

 

· the expenses and delays that we might suffer if our competitors protest a contract awarded to us, including the potential that the contract may be terminated and a new bid competition may be conducted.

 

If we are unable to win contracts awarded through the competitive bidding process, we may not be able to operate in the market for products and services that are provided under those contracts for a number of years. If we are unable to consistently win new contract awards over any extended period, or if we fail to anticipate all of the costs and resources that will be required to secure and perform such contract awards, our growth strategy and our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

 

We will sell products and services to companies in industries which tend to be extremely cyclical; downturns in those industries would adversely affect our results of operations.

 

The growth and profitability of our business will depend on sales to industries that are subject to cyclical downturns. Slowdowns in these industries may adversely affect sales by our businesses, which in turn would adversely affect our revenues and results of operations. In particular, our products may be sold to and used by the oil and gas industry, which historically has realized significant shifts in activity and spending due to fluctuations in commodity prices. Our revenues may be dependent upon spending by oil and gas producers; therefore, a reduction in spending by producers may have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, and results of operations.

 

The industries in which we may sell our products are heavily regulated and costs associated with such regulation could reduce our profitability.

 

Federal, state, and local authorities extensively regulate the stormwater and oil and gas industries, which are primary industries in which we may sell our products and offer our services. Legislation and regulations affecting the industries are under constant review for amendment or expansion. State and local authorities regulate various aspects of stormwater and oil and gas activities that ultimately affect how customers use our products and how we develop and market our products. The overall regulatory burden on the industries increases the cost of doing business, which, in turn, decreases profitability.

 

International sales are also subject to rules and regulations promulgated by regulatory bodies within foreign jurisdictions, and there can be no assurance that such foreign regulatory bodies will not adopt laws or regulatory requirements that could adversely affect our Company.

 

  24  

 

 

If chemical companies engage in predatory pricing, we may lose customers, which could materially and adversely affect us.

 

Municipalities and other commercial and industrial entities traditionally have used chemicals to control the quality of water and other fluids. The chemical companies represent a significant competitive factor. The chemical companies who supply chemicals to such municipalities and other commercial and industrial entities may, in order to maintain their business relationship, drastically reduce their price and seek to undercut the pricing at which we can realistically charge for our products and services. While predatory pricing that is designed to drive us out of business may be illegal under the United States anti-trust and other laws, we may lose customers as a result of any future predatory pricing and be required to file lawsuits against any companies who engage in such improper tactics. Any such litigation may be very expensive which will further impact us and affect their financial condition. As a result, predatory pricing by chemical companies could materially and adversely affect us.

 

We are, or in the future may be, subject to substantial regulation related to quality standards applicable to our manufacturing and quality processes. Our failure to comply with applicable quality standards could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

 

The EPA regulates the registration, manufacturing, and sales and marketing of products in our industry, and those of our distributors and partners, in the United States. Significant government regulation also exists in overseas markets. Compliance with applicable regulatory requirements is subject to continual review and is monitored through periodic inspections and other review and reporting mechanisms.

 

Failure by us or our partners to comply with current or future governmental regulations and quality assurance guidelines could lead to temporary manufacturing shutdowns, product recalls or related field actions, product shortages, or delays in product manufacturing. Specifically, with regard to the EPA’s conditional approval of the registration of our Smart Sponge Plus products under FIFRA, if the EPA makes additional information requests in the future that we are unable comply with, the EPA’s conditional approval of our registration of Smart Sponge Plus products under FIFRA could be suspended and the Company would then not be able to sell Smart Sponge Plus products. However, the expiration of the conditional approval of Smart Sponge Plus products would not affect our ability to continue to sell the regular Smart Sponge products that do not include an antimicrobial agent. (see PART I. Item 1. “BUSINESS – Regulatory” on page 18 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Efficacy or safety concerns and/or manufacturing quality issues with respect to our products or those of our partners could lead to product recalls, fines, withdrawals, declining sales, and/or our failure to successfully commercialize new products or otherwise achieve revenue growth.

 

Recent changes to U.S. tax laws may adversely affect our financial condition or results of operation and create the risk that we may need to adjust our accounting for these changes.

 

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”), enacted on December 22, 2017, makes significant changes to U.S. tax laws and includes numerous provisions that affect businesses, including ours. The Act is unclear in certain respects and will require interpretations and implementing regulations by the Internal Revenue Service, as well as state tax authorities, and the Act could be subject to amendments and technical corrections, any of which could lessen or increase the adverse (and positive) impacts of the Act. The accounting treatment of these tax law changes is complex, and some of the changes may affect both current and future periods. Others will primarily affect future periods. Consistent with guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission, our financial statements reflect our estimates of the tax effects of the Act on us to the extent we have been able to make such preliminary determinations. Although we believe these estimates are reasonable, they are provisional and may be adjusted prior to the end of 2018. We intend to complete accounting for the Act by the end of fiscal 2018. Any adjustments to our provisional estimates or the effects of currently unknown impacts of the Act on us could affect our current or future financial statements, or both.

 

The imposition of tariffs or duties on imported metals could significantly increase the price of the metals we purchase from international suppliers and/or shortages in the supply of raw materials.

 

On April 19, 2017, the U.S. Department of Commerce (the “DOC”) initiated an investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to determine the effects of steel imports on U.S. national security. On January 11, 2018, the DOC submitted its investigation report to the President, who, on March 8, 2018, signed two Presidential Proclamations imposing a 25% tariff on steel, and a 10% tariff on aluminum, imported from all countries except Canada and Mexico beginning on March 23, 2018. The imposition of these, or any future imposition of tariffs or duties, is expected to have a pervasive impact on the metals market in which we operate and could result in a decrease in imports and higher prices for those imports which are sold into the U.S. If we buy metals internationally, we may be unable to pass through the higher costs to our customers, which could adversely impact our financial condition and operating results. In addition, a decrease in imports could cause a disruption or shortage in the availability of the raw materials that we buy, which could limit our ability to meet our customer's demand or purchase material at competitive prices. This could cause us to lose sales, incur additional costs, or suffer harm to our reputation, all of which may adversely affect our operating results.

 

  25  

 

 

If a natural or man-made disaster strikes our or a third-party’s manufacturing facility that we may use, we may be unable to manufacture our products for a substantial amount of time and our sales and profitability will decline.

 

The manufacturing facility and manufacturing equipment we use to produce our products will be costly to replace and could require substantial lead-time to repair or replace. Our facility or a third-party’s facility that we use may be affected by natural or man-made disasters. In the event they were affected by a disaster, we would be forced to set up alternative production capacity, or rely on third-party manufacturers to whom we would have to disclose our trade secrets. Although we possess insurance for damage to our property and the disruption of our business from casualties, such insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of our potential losses, may not continue to be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all, and may not address the marketing and goodwill consequences of our inability to provide products for an extended period of time.

 

We may decide to outsource manufacturing in the future. Dependence on contract manufacturing and outsourcing other portions of our supply chain may adversely affect our ability to bring products to market and damage our reputation.

 

As part of our efforts to streamline operations and to cut costs in the future, we may decide to outsource aspects of our manufacturing processes and other functions. If our contract manufacturers or other outsourcers fail to perform their obligations in a timely manner or at satisfactory quality levels, our ability to bring products to market and our reputation could suffer. For example, during a market upturn, our contract manufacturers may be unable to meet our demand requirements, which may preclude us from fulfilling our customers’ orders on a timely basis. The ability of these manufacturers to perform is largely outside of our control. Additionally, outsourcing may take place in developing countries and, as a result, may be subject to geopolitical uncertainty.

 

The success of our businesses will depend on our ability to effectively develop and implement strategic business initiatives.

 

We are currently implementing various strategic business initiatives. In connection with the development and implementation of these initiatives, we will incur additional expenses and capital expenditures to implement the initiatives. The development and implementation of these initiatives also requires management to divert a portion of its time from day-to-day operations. These expenses and diversions could have a significant impact on our operations and profitability, particularly if the initiatives prove to be unsuccessful. Moreover, if we are unable to implement an initiative in a timely manner, or if those initiatives turn out to be ineffective or are executed improperly, our business and operating results would be adversely affected.

 

Failure to successfully reduce our current or future production costs may adversely affect our financial results.

 

A significant portion of our strategy will rely upon our ability to successfully rationalize and improve the efficiency of our operations. In particular, our strategy relies on our ability to reduce our production costs in order to remain competitive. If we are unable to continue to successfully implement cost reduction measures, or if these efforts do not generate the level of cost savings that we expect going forward or result in higher than expected costs, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

 

  26  

 

 

If we are unable to make necessary capital investments or respond to pricing pressures, our business may be harmed.

 

In order to remain competitive, we need to invest in research and development, manufacturing, customer service and support, and marketing. From time to time, we may have to adjust the prices of our products and services to remain competitive. We may not have available sufficient financial or other resources to continue to make investments necessary to maintain our competitive position.

 

Failure to obtain sufficient supply of component materials to conduct our business may have an adverse effect on our production and revenue targets.

 

Our component and materials’ suppliers may fail to meet our needs. We intend to manufacture our products using materials and components procured from a limited number of third-party suppliers. We do not currently have long-term supply contracts with our suppliers. This generally serves to reduce our commitment risk, but does expose us to supply risk and to price increases that we may have to pass on to our customers. In some cases, supply shortages and delays in delivery may result in curtailed production or delays in production, which can contribute to an increase in inventory levels and loss of profit. We expect that shortages and delays in deliveries of some components will occur from time to time. If we are unable to obtain sufficient components on a timely basis, we may experience manufacturing delays, which could harm our relationships with current or prospective customers and reduce our sales. We may also not be able to obtain competitive pricing for some of our supplies compared to our competitors. We also cannot assure that the component and materials from domestic suppliers will be of similar quality or quantity as those imported component and materials, which may lead to rejections of component and materials by our customers. In the event the domestic component and materials do not perform as well as the imported component and materials or do not perform at all, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.

 

We have limited product distribution experience and we expect to rely on third parties who may not successfully sell our products.

 

We have limited product distribution experience and currently rely and plan to rely on product distribution arrangements with third parties. We may also license our technology to certain third parties for commercialization of certain applications. We expect to enter into distribution agreements and/or licensing agreements in the future, and we may not be able to enter into these agreements on terms that are favorable to us, if at all. In addition, we may have limited or no control over the distribution activities of these third parties. These third parties could sell competing products and may devote insufficient sales efforts to our products. As a result, our future revenues from sales of our products, if any, will depend on the success of the efforts of these third parties.

 

We could face significant liabilities in connection with our technology, products, and business operations, which if incurred beyond any insurance limits, would adversely affect our business and financial condition.

 

We are subject to a variety of potential liabilities connected to our technology development and business operations, such as potential liabilities related to environmental risks. As a business which manufactures and/or markets products for use by consumers and institutions, we may become liable for any damage caused by our products, whether used in the manner intended or not. Any such claim of liability, whether meritorious or not, could be time-consuming and/or result in costly litigation. Although we have obtained insurance against certain of these risks, no assurance can be given that such insurance will be adequate to cover related liabilities or will be available in the future or, if available, that premiums will be commercially justifiable. If we were to incur any substantial liability and related damages were not covered by our insurance or exceeded policy limits, or if we were to incur such liability at a time when we are not able to obtain liability insurance, our business, financial conditions, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

 

Our failure to protect our intellectual property rights may undermine our competitive position, and litigation to protect our intellectual property rights or defend against third-party allegations of infringement may result in significant costs, which could harm our financial position and results of operations.

 

Our success will depend in part on our ability to develop patentable products and obtain and enforce patent protection for our products in the United States and other countries. We intend to file applications, as appropriate, for patents covering our products. Patents may not be issued for any pending or future patent applications owned by or licensed to us, and the claims allowed under any issued patents may not be sufficiently broad to protect our technology. Any issued patents owned by or licensed to us may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, and the rights under these patents may not provide us with competitive advantages. In addition, competitors may design around our technology or develop competing technologies. Intellectual property rights may also be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries, which could make it easier for competitors to capture increased market position. We could incur substantial costs to defend suits brought against us or suits in which we may assert our patent rights against others. An unfavorable outcome of any such litigation could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.

 

  27  

 

 

We may also rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how with which we seek to protect our products, in part by confidentiality agreements with our collaborators, employees, and consultants. Nevertheless, these agreements afford only limited protection, and the actions we take to protect our intellectual property rights may not be adequate. These agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently developed by our competitors. As a result, third parties may infringe or misappropriate our proprietary technologies or other intellectual property rights, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or operating results.

 

In addition, policing unauthorized use of proprietary technology can be difficult and expensive. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets, or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. We cannot assure you that the outcome of any litigation will be in our favor. Intellectual property litigation may be costly and may divert management attention, as well as expend our other resources away from our business. An adverse determination in any such litigation will impair our intellectual property rights and may harm our business, prospects, and reputation. In addition, we have no insurance coverage against litigation costs and would have to bear all costs arising from such litigation to the extent we are unable to recover them from other parties. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

 

The SEC is conducting an investigation involving the Company, the results of which could have a material impact on the Company financial position, operating results, and cash flows.

 

On May 28, 2015, the Company received a subpoena that stated that the staff of the SEC is conducting an investigation In the Matter of Abtech Holdings, Inc. (NY-9262) (see PART I. Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” below). In 2016 and 2017, the SEC issued additional subpoenas pertaining to this investigation to two officers, a director, a prior director, a prior employee of the Company, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and several law firms who have counseled the Company. We cannot estimate the full impact that this investigation and any results it may have on the Company’s financial position, operating results or cash flows. In addition to significant monetary costs and the impact on our business as a result of the subpoena and investigation, and any outcome thereof, there may be adverse publicity associated with this matter that could result in reputational harm to us that may adversely affect our business, stock price, results of operations and financial condition. Further, the investigation has caused senior management to divert significant time and resources from managing the business operations. We have not yet recorded a liability related to the cost of resolving of this matter although we have incurred and recognized material compliance costs to date. At this time, no estimate of the possible loss or range of loss can be made. In the meantime, we are continuing to incur significant legal fees for compliance with the SEC subpoenas.

 

Operational and Structural Risks

 

We can provide no assurances as to our future financial performance or the investment result of a purchase of our common stock.

 

Any projected results of operations involve significant risks and uncertainty, should be considered speculative, and depend on various assumptions which may not be correct. The future performance of our Company and the return on our common stock depends on a complex series of events that are beyond our control and that may or may not occur. Actual results for any period may or may not approximate any assumptions that are made and may differ significantly from such assumptions. We can provide no assurance or prediction as to our future profitability or to the ultimate success of an investment in our common stock.

 

  28  

 

 

The compensation we pay to our executive officers and employees will likely increase, which will affect our future profitability.

 

We believe that the compensation we have historically paid to our executive officers is within the lower quartile of compensation paid by peer companies. An increase in compensation and bonuses payable to our executive officers and employees could decrease our net income.

 

As a public reporting company, we are subject to corporate governance and internal control reporting requirements, and our costs related to compliance with, or our failure to comply with, existing and future requirements, could adversely affect our business.

 

We may face new corporate governance requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”), as well as new rules and regulations subsequently adopted by the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. These laws, rules, and regulations continue to evolve and may become increasingly stringent in the future. We are required to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of SOX (“Section 404”). We are a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act. Section 404 requires us to include an internal control report with our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The report must include management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the fiscal year. This report must also include disclosure of any material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting that we have identified. Failure to comply, or any adverse results from such evaluation, could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports and have an adverse effect on the trading price of our securities. We strive to continuously evaluate and improve our control structure to help ensure that we comply with Section 404. The financial cost of compliance with these laws, rules, and regulations is expected to remain substantial. We cannot assure you that we will be able to fully comply with these laws, rules, and regulations that address corporate governance, internal control reporting, and similar matters. Failure to comply with these laws, rules, and regulations could materially adversely affect our reputation, financial condition, and the value of our securities.

 

As a public company, we will have significant operating costs relating to compliance requirements and our management is required to devote substantial time to compliance initiatives.

 

Our management has only limited experience operating the Company as a public company. To operate effectively, we will be required to continue to implement changes in certain aspects of our business and develop, manage, and train management level and other employees to comply with on-going public company requirements. Failure to take such actions, or delay in the implementation thereof, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

SOX, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, imposes various requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and changes in corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly.

 

Risks Related to our Common Stock

 

A limited public trading market exists for our common stock, which makes it more difficult for our stockholders to sell their common stock in the public markets.

 

Although our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “ABHD,” there is a limited public market for our common stock. No assurance can be given that an active market will develop or that a stockholder will ever be able to liquidate its shares of common stock without considerable delay, if at all. Many brokerage firms may not be willing to effect transactions in our securities. Even if a purchaser finds a broker willing to effect a transaction in our securities, the combination of brokerage commissions, state transfer taxes, if any, and any other selling costs may exceed the selling price. Furthermore, our stock price may be impacted by factors that are unrelated or disproportionate to our operating performance. These market fluctuations, as well as general economic, political, and market conditions, such as recessions, interest rates, or international currency fluctuations may adversely affect the market price and liquidity of our common stock.

 

  29  

 

 

Our stock price may be volatile.

 

The market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:

 

· limited “public float” in the hands of a small number of persons whose sales (or lack of sales) could result in positive or negative pricing pressure on the market price for our common stock;
· actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results;
· changes in our earnings estimates;
· our ability to obtain adequate working capital financing;
· changes in market valuations of similar companies;
· publication (or lack of publication) of research reports about us;
· changes in applicable laws or regulations, court rulings, enforcement and legal actions;
· loss of any strategic relationships;
· additions or departures of key management personnel;
· actions by our stockholders (including transactions in our shares);
· speculation in the press or investment community;
· increases in market interest rates, which may increase our cost of capital;
· changes in our industry;
· competitive pricing pressures;
· our ability to execute our business plan; and
· economic and other external factors.

 

In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

 

Our common stock may be subject to the penny stock rules which may make it more difficult to sell our common stock.

 

The SEC has adopted regulations which generally define a “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price, as defined, less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities may be covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and accredited investors, such as institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or an individual with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with his or her spouse. For transactions covered by this rule, the broker-dealers must make a special suitability determination for the purchase and receive the purchaser’s written agreement of the transaction prior to the sale. Consequently, the rule may affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and also affect the ability of our stockholders to sell their shares in the secondary market.

 

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a shareholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

 

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative, low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives, and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative, low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

 

  30  

 

 

Our common shares are currently traded at low volume, and you may be unable to sell at or near ask prices or at all if you need to sell or liquidate a substantial number of shares at one time.

 

We cannot predict the extent to which an active public market for our common stock will develop or be sustained. Our common shares are currently traded, but currently with low volume, based on quotations on the OTCQB, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common shares at or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is still relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors, and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would be reluctant to follow an unproven company such as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until such time as we became more seasoned and viable. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained, or that trading levels will be sustained.

 

Shareholders should be aware that, according to SEC Release No. 34-29093, the market for “penny stocks” has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include: (1) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (2) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (3) boiler room practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (4) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (5) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses. Our management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market, and we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market. The occurrence of these patterns or practices could increase the future volatility of our share price.

 

We have historically not paid dividends and do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

 

We have historically not paid dividends to our stockholders, and management does not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock to our stockholders for the foreseeable future. Any determination we make regarding dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our results of operations, our financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law, and other factors our Board of Directors deem relevant. Even if the funds are legally available for distribution, we may nevertheless decide not to pay any dividends or may be restricted from paying dividends due to the covenants in any future financing agreements. We presently intend to retain future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business.

 

The elimination of monetary liability against our directors, officers, and employees under Nevada law and the existence of indemnification rights to our directors, officers, and employees may result in substantial expenditures by our Company and may discourage lawsuits against our directors, officers, and employees.

 

Our articles of incorporation contain a provision permitting us to eliminate the personal liability of our directors to our Company and shareholders for damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer to the extent provided by Nevada law. We may also have contractual indemnification obligations under our employment agreements with our officers. The foregoing indemnification obligations could result in our Company incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage awards against directors and officers, which we may be unable to recoup. These provisions and resultant costs may also discourage our Company from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties, and may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by our shareholders against our directors and officers even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit our Company and shareholders.

 

  31  

 

 

Two of our shareholders own a significant amount of our voting stock and may have interests that differ from our other shareholders. As a result, these significant shareholders may take actions that are not in the interests of our other shareholders.

 

Two of our shareholders collectively beneficially own in the aggregate 79.6% of our issued and outstanding common stock, with one shareholder beneficially owning 66.6% of our issued and outstanding common stock. Therefore, these shareholders have significant control over the outcome of matters submitted to a vote of shareholders, including, but not limited to, electing directors, adopting amendments to our certificate of incorporation, and approving corporate transactions. In addition, due to these shareholders’ significant ownership, they may approve certain matters requiring shareholder approval by written consent without soliciting the votes of other shareholders. Circumstances may occur in which the interests of these significant shareholders could be in conflict with the interests of our other shareholders, and would have the requisite voting power to take actions that align with their individual interest and not the interests of our other shareholders. Should conflicts of interest arise, we can provide no assurance that these significant shareholders would act in the best interests of our other shareholders or that any conflicts of interest would be resolved in a manner favorable to our other shareholders.

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

 

We currently lease an administrative office of 6,066 square feet located at 4110 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 235, Scottsdale, Arizona 85251. The Company also leases a 13,000 square foot space for its manufacturing facility located at 3610-2 E. Southern Ave., Phoenix, Arizona 85040.

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

 

On May 28, 2015, the Company received a subpoena from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that stated that the staff of the SEC is conducting an investigation In the Matter of Abtech Holdings, Inc. (NY-9262) .  Generally, the SEC’s subpoena asked for all documents, agreements, and communications concerning (i) the Company’s Contract for Services with Nassau County, New York, dated October 8, 2013; (ii) Dean Skelos, his son, Adam Skelos, who acted as a consultant to the Company, and their related entities; (iii) SLC Clean Water, LLC, Axiom, Glenwood Management, and a number of other listed individuals and entities; (iv) certain Board and Board committee minutes and related materials; (v) certain policies, procedures, and internal controls in effect at the Company; (vi) certain communications with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, transfer agent, potential and current investors, broker-dealers, investment advisors, and finders; and (vii) certain other organizational and financial account information of the Company.  The Company has provided a substantial number of documents in response to the SEC subpoena.  In 2016 and 2017, the SEC issued additional subpoenas pertaining to this investigation to two officers, a director, a prior director, a prior employee of the Company, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and several law firms who have counseled the Company from 2013 to the present.

 

The Company believes the SEC’s subpoenas are a result of the complaint announced on May 4, 2015 that was filed by federal authorities against Dean and Adam Skelos. That trial came to an end in December 2015 when both men were convicted of eight counts each, including fraud, bribery and extortion of three separate companies – one of which was the Company. The Company cooperated fully with the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York throughout the Skelos investigation and trial, by providing subpoenaed documents and other evidence and having the Company’s president and CEO testify on behalf of the government at the trial. In September 2017, a federal appeals panel overturned the 2015 corruption convictions of Dean Skelos and Adam Skelos. The Company is uncertain at this point if it will have any further involvement in this matter.

 

The investigation by the SEC is ongoing and no resolution can be predicted at this time. We have not yet recorded a liability related to the cost of resolving this matter although we have incurred and recognized material compliance costs to date. At this time, no estimate of the possible loss or range of loss can be made. In the meantime, we are continuing to incur significant legal fees for compliance with the SEC subpoenas.

 

  32  

 

 

In May 2016, the Company, AEWS and AbTech received letters from the New York State Joint Commission on Public Ethics (“JCOPE”) asking for a written response to allegations constituting potential violations of lobbying laws in the state of New York. The Company’s legal counsel provided a written response to JCOPE on May 31, 2016, wherein they presented the Company’s position that it has consistently complied with all applicable lobbying laws. On August 15, 2016, JCOPE issued notices to the Company, AbTech and AEWS that JCOPE had decided to commence an investigation to determine whether a substantial basis exists to conclude that the Company violated lobbying laws in the state of New York. The Company intends to defend its position that it has consistently complied with all applicable lobbying laws and is working with JCOPE to resolve this matter. However, it is not clear at this time how the matter will ultimately be resolved.

 

In accordance with the stockholder proposal approved by the Company’s stockholders at the May 13, 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Stockholder Proposal”), the Company engaged legal counsel to assess whether the Company should pursue legal action to recover financial losses and damages pertaining to the United States vs. Dean Skelos and Adam Skelos case. The Company, through its legal counsel, is currently in discussions with one entity regarding damages claimed by the Company. However, it cannot be determined at this time how this matter will ultimately be resolved.

 

As of December 31, 2017, the Company had incurred approximately $3,490,000 in legal fees and other costs related to the matters described above, including approximately $1,431,000 incurred during 2017. The Company cannot estimate at this time the cost of additional legal representation in resolving the SEC investigation, the JCOPE investigation or pursuing legal action pursuant to the Stockholder Proposal.

 

The Company has filed a claim for coverage for some of these legal fees under a liability insurance policy. The insurer denied the claim and the Company engaged legal counsel to dispute the insurer’s denial of the claim. After an unsuccessful attempt to resolve the dispute through mediation, the Company filed a formal complaint against the insurer on July 11, 2016, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In December 2016, the insurer remitted a payment to the Company of $465,187 for a portion of the claim that the insurer determined to be covered by the policy. During 2017, the insurer remitted additional payments totaling $1,138,984 to the Company, or directly to the applicable law firms, for legal fees related to these matters. The payments made by the insurer were offset against other selling, general and administrative operating expenses in the periods in which such payments were received. The ultimate outcome of the litigation with the insurer cannot be determined at this time.

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

 

Not applicable.

 

  33  

 

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

 

Market Information

 

Our common stock is listed on the OTCQB U.S. Market under the symbol “ABHD.” Our common stock has been listed on the OTCQB or OTCBB since June 2010. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our common stock.

 

The table below sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low stock prices for our common stock as reported by NASDAQ.com. These quotations may represent prices between dealers without adjustment for retail markups, markdowns, or commissions and may not represent actual transactions.

 

    Sales Price of Common Stock  
Quarter ended   High     Low  
             
December 31, 2017   $ 0.0180     $ 0.0126  
                 
September 30, 2017   $ 0.0190     $ 0.0105  
                 
June 30, 2017   $ 0.0240     $ 0.0110  
                 
March 31, 2017   $ 0.0175     $ 0.0061  
                 
December 31, 2016   $ 0.0330     $ 0.0019  
                 
September 30, 2016   $ 0.0440     $ 0.0250  
                 
June 30, 2016   $ 0.0440     $ 0.0191  
                 
March 31, 2016   $ 0.0300     $ 0.0189  

 

Stockholders

 

As of March 28, 2018 there were 191 stockholders of record of our common stock and approximately 2,000 additional “street name” holders whose shares are held of record by banks, brokers and other financial institutions. Our transfer agent is Worldwide Stock Transfer, LLC. The transfer agent’s address is 1 University Plaza, Suite 505, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601.

 

Dividends

 

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. Our future payment of dividends will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, expansion plans, financial condition, and other relevant factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant. Our accumulated deficit currently limits our ability to pay dividends.

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

 

There were no unregistered sales of our equity securities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

 

Repurchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchases

 

There were no issuer repurchases of our equity securities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

 

  34  

 

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION.

 

As a smaller reporting company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide the information required by this item.

 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

 

Forward-Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Results

 

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors, including those set forth under Risk Factors. Please refer to the discussion on forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Overview

 

Management is focused on establishing the Company as a reliable provider of water treatment solutions in the emerging markets for the treatment of stormwater, produced water and other industrial water applications. Abtech Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “ABHD”) is the parent holding company. Its subsidiary, AbTech Industries, Inc. (“AbTech”), is the operating company that manufactures and sells water treatment products, many of which incorporate its patented Smart Sponge ® technology. The operations of AEWS Engineering LLC (“AEWS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, were transferred to AbTech in 2015 and AEWS is currently dormant. Environmental Security Corporation is also a dormant wholly-owned subsidiary that holds a patent regarding a sensor array technology designed to detect impurities in water flows. This “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is based on the consolidated operations of ABHD and its subsidiaries.

 

The Company has and continues to incur significant costs as it seeks to gain traction in its targeted water treatment markets and position itself with validated treatment solutions that, if accepted and adopted by the market, could greatly increase revenues in the future. The Company’s operations reflect limited historical sales revenue as the Company attempts to engage in those business development activities that management believes have the greatest opportunity to generate future revenues. Key factors affecting the Company’s results of operations during the periods covered in this section include revenues, cost of revenues, operating expenses and interest expense.

 

Results of Operations

 

We generate revenues by selling products and services related to the treatment of contaminated water so that such water can either be discharged or reused. All of our products sold in 2017 and 2016 included some form of Smart Sponge filtration media, which we manufacture, or were accessories used for the deployment of Smart Sponge products, such as diversion collars, vessels and containment cages. Our products include a variety of designs and sizes to effectively address many applications where water treatment is needed. Our revenue in 2017 was comprised of the following:

 

Product   % of Revenue  
Ultra-Urban Filters     63 %
Smart Paks     11 %
Accessories     10 %
Filtration media     9 %
Skimmers     3 %
Freight & other     4 %
Total     100 %

 

  35  

 

 

We sell our products to distributors, contractors, original equipment manufacturers and end-users.

 

Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

 

Revenue

 

Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased by $263,151 to $573,107, or 85%, compared to revenues in 2016. The increase was due entirely to the increase in the quantity of product sales and included several relatively large orders from prior customers as well as the Company’s first sale of Ultra-Urban ® Filters containing a filtration media that combined Smart Sponge ® polymer with the Company’s new licensed media for filtering heavy metals. Sales in 2017 continued to be predominantly comprised of products used in stormwater treatment applications although approximately 7% of product sales in 2017 were for industrial applications. The Company has continued its redirected sales effort to focus more resources on non-stormwater applications of its products while continuing to support stormwater product sales through direct sales staff and through distributors in international markets. The Company’s redirected sales efforts did not have a significant impact on revenue in 2017 as most of the new opportunities being pursued have long lead times and involve the development and testing of new or modified products.

 

In 2017, our largest customer was a distributor, whose order for a stormwater project at a military base in the United States, accounted for approximately 23% of revenues. In 2016, our largest customer was a different distributor, which accounted for approximately 16% of revenues. There were no other customers that accounted for more than 10% of revenues in 2017 or 2016.

 

As discussed in NOTE 1 – BUSINESS AND SUMMARY ACCOUNTING POLICIES to the consolidated financial statements included in this Report on Form 10-K, the Company does not expect that the adoption of Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” will have a material impact on revenue when adopted in 2018 based on the types of contracts with customers currently in place.

 

Gross Margins

 

The gross margin percentage increased to 19% in 2017 compared to a negative gross margin of (16)% in 2016. The significant improvement in gross margin in 2017 was due to increased product sales during the period which helped offset the fixed costs of excess manufacturing capacity. The Company’s manufacturing facility operated at just over 2% of operating capacity during 2017, compared to approximately 1% in 2016. If, in the future, the Company can spread the overhead costs of operating the manufacturing facility over a larger base of produced products, the margins would be expected to improve significantly. In 2017, the Company converted a portion of its manufacturing facility to handle the production of heavy metal media. The cost of this conversion included approximately $35,000 for equipment, which will be depreciated over 5 to10 years and $6,000 in expenses for supplies and materials. This additional manufacturing capability for heavy metal media production did not affect the Company’s capacity for the production of Smart Sponge media which remains at approximately 75,000 pounds per month. We do not currently have plans to reduce manufacturing capacity and we anticipate that excess capacity will continue to adversely affect gross margins in 2018. Going forward, the Company expects that gross margin percentages, quarter by quarter, could vary widely depending on the volume of product sales, the corresponding volume of product manufacturing and the mix of products sold.

 

As described above, the Company expects to see increased margins for its product sales as it expands its volume to realize economies of scale. AbTech may also become involved in the sale of equipment manufactured by other vendors and may work on stormwater projects involving a combination of services, products, and work performed by other subcontractors. Accordingly, we expect to realize blended gross margin rates that could vary significantly.

 

  36  

 

 

The polymers we use to manufacture Smart Sponge material are produced by the petrochemical industry and use crude oil as a primary raw material. Accordingly, fluctuations in the price of crude oil can have a direct and significant impact on the cost of the polymers we use. The Company purchases its polymers infrequently and in large quantities to take advantage of quantity price breaks. The Company did not make any significant polymer purchases in 2017 or 2016. However, as an example of the significant effect such price fluctuations can have on product costs, a large purchase of one of the polymers was made in a prior year at a price that was 2.1 times the cost of the previous purchase of this same polymer. Before this price increase, the cost of these polymers represented approximately 5.1% of the list selling price of a typical UUF (2.5% for antimicrobial version) and approximately 6.3% of the list selling price of a typical Smart Pak insert (3.1% for antimicrobial version). After the price change, the cost of polymers as a percentage of list selling price increased to 9.2% for UUFs (4.5% for antimicrobial version) and 11.5% for Smart Pak inserts (5.7% for antimicrobial version). These percentages vary by product sold, depending on the size of the product and the amount of Smart Sponge media used in the product. The Company establishes its list selling prices taking into consideration the cost of the component materials (including polymers), competitive factors and other market conditions. The cost of the polymers used in the Smart Sponge products accounted for approximately 9% and 8% of the total cost of revenues in 2017 and 2016, respectively. While the Company has no contractual right to pass along fluctuations in raw material costs to customers, it does have the right to change selling prices from time to time by giving distributors 30 days advance notice.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses were approximately $559,000 lower in 2017 than in 2016 due in part to insurance proceeds received in 2017, which offset legal fees incurred by the Company in both 2017 and 2016 related to subpoenas issued by the SEC regarding its investigation In the Matter of Abtech Holdings, Inc. (NY-9262) (the “SEC Investigation”) . These insurance reimbursements totaled approximately $1,139,000 in 2017. In 2017 and 2016 the Company incurred significant legal fees in responding to (i) a Federal investigation regarding the indictment, and subsequent trial, of New York State Senator Dean Skelos and his son, Adam Skelos, who acted as a consultant to the Company (the “Federal Investigation”); (ii) the SEC Investigation, which has involved subpoenas to the Company, two officers, a director, a prior director, a prior employee of the Company, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and several law firms who have counseled the Company from 2013 to the present; (iii) an investigation by the New York State Joint Commission on Public Ethics regarding alleged violations of lobbying laws in the state of New York (the “JCOPE Investigation”); (iv) litigation with an insurance carrier regarding a claim for coverage of legal expenses incurred in the Federal Investigation and the SEC Investigation; and (v) legal analysis, conducted in response to a shareholder proposal approved by the Company’s stockholders at the May 13, 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to determine if the Company should pursue legal action to recover financial losses and damages related to the Federal Investigation. Fees for these matters totaled approximately $1,485,000 in 2017 and $882,000 in 2016. Excluding these legal expenses and corresponding reimbursements, the Company achieved other reductions in selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $488,000 in 2017 compared to 2016, due primarily to a $245,000 reduction in payroll and related benefits expenses, a $52,000 reduction in travel expenses, a $113,000 reduction in audit related costs and a $125,000 reduction in fees for members of the board and advisory board, consultants, public relations and investor relations. These expense reductions were partially offset by a $23,000 increase in sales commissions for the period.

 

As discussed in NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES to the consolidated financial statements included in this Report on Form 10-K, the Company does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02, “ Leases (Topic 842),” or ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ,” to have a material impact on operating expenses upon adoption.

 

Research and development expenses

 

The Company’s primary research and development (“R&D”) focus in 2017 and 2016 has been new products for the treatment of produced water, and other industrial applications. These activities have included the development of filtration media for the treatment of heavy metals and evaporative technologies to treat produced water. In both years, these efforts involved a significant amount of product testing in the lab and in the field with corresponding costs for personnel (employees and consultants), fees for lab analysis, equipment rental and travel costs.

 

  37  

 

 

R&D expenses decreased by approximately $208,000, or 18%, in 2017 compared to 2016. The reduced R&D expenses in 2017 were primarily attributable to a decrease of approximately $218,000 in payroll and related benefits expenses. R&D expenses in 2017 were also affected by a transfer to inventory of approximately $34,500 of expenses related to the production of the Company’s heavy metal filtration media. These costs were expensed in 2016 as part of an experimental production run of the new media. However, in 2017, after the produced media was thoroughly tested and evaluated, a portion of the material was determined to be market-ready and the related cost was transferred to inventory resulting in the R&D expenses related to this project being $69,000 less in 2017 than in 2016. The decrease in R&D expenses in 2017 was also attributable to a $77,000 reduction in field testing costs for a test that was concluded in 2016. The cost reductions were partially offset by the increased spending by the Company in 2017 for the evaporative technology. Expenses for this project, including consultant fees, totaled approximately $326,000 in 2017, compared to $275,000 in 2016. Costs for this project are expected to continue in 2018 as the Company continues its development efforts with this technology including further modifications and field testing of the prototype unit. R&D expenses in 2017 also included $100,000 for minimum royalty fees accrued for the licensed heavy metal technology.

 

As discussed in NOTE 1 – BUSINESS AND SUMMARY ACCOUNTING POLICIES to the consolidated financial statements included in this report on Form 10-K, the Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” to have a material impact on research and development expenses upon adoption.

 

Other income (expense)

 

Interest expense increased to approximately $668,000 in 2017 compared to $253,000 in 2016 due to the increased amount of outstanding loans from investors accruing interest at a rate of 10% per annum.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Liquidity

 

At December 31, 2017, the Company had a working capital deficiency of approximately $11,000,000 compared to a working capital deficiency of approximately $6,534,000 at December 31, 2016. This increase in the working capital deficit during 2017 is primarily attributable to the use of cash for operations during 2017 and short term borrowing during the year totaling $3,682,000. The Company’s cash balance decreased from $84,415 at December 31, 2016 to $58,435 at December 31, 2017. This cash balance represents less than one month of the Company’s historical monthly cash used for operations and evidences the Company’s need to raise additional capital in the immediate short-term. In the first three months of 2018, the Company received additional short-term loans of $785,000 from two related party stockholders to fund operations.

 

To date, the Company has not generated sufficient revenue to cover its operating costs and continues to operate with negative cash flow. While we hope to achieve significant sales growth over the long-term, continued negative cash flow from operations is expected in the short term. The Company will require additional capital to maintain current operations until the Company achieves the sales growth necessary to cover operating costs and expenses. The Company expects to raise additional capital through continued financing arrangements with its shareholders. The Company has $9,537,631 of short term debt, including accrued interest, which will need to be repaid, extended or refinanced by the Company during 2018. In addition, rapid sales growth may require the Company to enter into working capital financing arrangements. The Company has no such financing commitments in place and can provide no assurance that such a commitment can be obtained on reasonable terms, if at all. For a further discussion of management’s planned course of action to remedy the current deficiency in liquidity, see “ Going Concern and Management’s Plans,” later in this section.

 

Operations in 2017 and 2016 were funded primarily by proceeds from short-term loans from related party stockholders. The net proceeds from these loans amounted to $3,682,000 and $3,731,000 in 2017 and 2016, respectively.

 

The Company has a bank line of credit with a credit limit of $100,000. The line of credit has an annual interest rate of prime plus 6.75% and requires monthly payment of any interest due plus approximately 1% of the outstanding balance. The outstanding balance due on the bank line of credit as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $65,625 and $82,870, respectively.

 

  38  

 

 

Comparison of cash flow for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

 

Operating Activities

 

The Company had negative cash flow from operations in 2017 of approximately $3.6 million compared to negative cash flows from operations of $4.4 million in 2016. The reduction of negative cash flow in 2017 is largely attributable to the approximate $931,000 decrease in operating loss for the year. In addition, the Company used cash for only $26,000 of interest payments during the year while incurring approximately $668,000 in interest expense, resulting in an increase of $642,000 in accrued interest payable during the year. The increase in accrued interest payable during 2016 was comparably lower at approximately $215,000. The use of cash was also reduced in both 2017 and 2016 by the accrual of unpaid expenses of $52,000 and $45,000, respectively. Net inventory decreased in both 2017 and 2016 by approximately $15,000 and $52,000, respectively, as the Company used its supply of polymer materials to make products and did not make any major purchases of new polymer raw materials in 2017 or 2016.

 

These decreases in uses of cash for operations in 2017 were partially offset by the use of cash for a reduction in accounts payable of approximately $2,000 in 2017 compared to an increase in accounts payable during 2016 of approximately $39,000. The reduction in accounts payable during 2017 was partially due to payments made by an insurer in 2017 for legal fees incurred in 2017 and 2016.

 

Investing Activities

 

The Company had capital expenditures of approximately $64,000 in 2017 and $9,000 in 2016. The capital expenditures in 2017 were primarily related to manufacturing equipment purchased and installed for the production of heavy metal media. These capital expenditures were partially offset by proceeds of $10,000 from the sale of fixed assets that were located in the Raleigh, North Carolina office, which was closed in the second quarter of 2017. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had no commitments for any material future capital expenditures.

 

Financing Activities

 

Net cash provided by financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 amounted to approximately $3.6 million and $3.8 million, respectively. The primary financing sources of cash for the year ended December 31, 2017 were cash advances totaling $3,682,000 from two related party stockholders. The net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 included proceeds of $3.7 million from the same two related party stockholders and draws of $90,000 on the Company’s bank line of credit. The Company made repayments on the bank line of credit in 2017 and 2016 of $17,245 and $7,130, respectively.

 

In 2017, the Company entered into a new capital lease for approximately $54,000, which was used to finance the purchase of manufacturing equipment that will allow the Company to bring in-house certain manufacturing processes previously outsourced, as a cost-saving measure.

 

During 2017 the Company made payments totaling $60,000 to the holder of a convertible promissory note, of which approximately $55,000 was applied to reduce the principal amount of the note to a balance of $44,546 at December 31, 2017. Under amended terms of this note, the Company will not be obligated to make additional monthly payments on the note until May 15, 2018, provided the note remains outstanding as of that date.

 

  39  

 

 

Going Concern and Management’s Plans

 

The accompanying December 31, 2017 consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern and the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As discussed in NOTE 2 to the accompanying December 31, 2017 consolidated financial statements, we have not established an ongoing source of revenue sufficient to cover operating expenses and have incurred net losses from operations since our inception. These losses, along with the associated substantial accumulated deficit, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date these financial statements are issued. As a result, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in their report dated April 3, 2018, included an emphasis-of-matter paragraph with respect to our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, expressing uncertainty regarding the Company’s assumption that it will continue as a going concern. The accompanying December 31, 2017 consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities or any other adjustment that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. Management believes that the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern will be dependent on its ability to raise additional capital and/or generate significant sales growth in the short term and resolve the legal matters described Part I, Item 3 Legal Proceedings of this report on Form 10-K. The Company’s ability to achieve these objectives cannot be determined at this time. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are described in NOTE 2 to the accompanying December 31, 2017 consolidated financial statements. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital and/or generate significant sales growth in the near term, and resolve the legal matters described in Part I, Item 3 Legal Proceedings of this report on form 10-K, there is a risk that the Company could default on debt maturing during 2018. Further, the Company is currently in default on notes that matured in April 2017; however, the Company is currently in discussion with the noteholder to extend the maturity date but there can be no assurances that the noteholder will not elect to exercise his default remedies under the notes. The Company does not currently have sufficient liquidity to repay the indebtedness. While the Company does not expect the noteholder to accelerate the indebtedness, the noteholder may do so at any time, or may initiate foreclosure actions, or seek any other remedies permitted by the terms of the notes and applicable law. Should the holders of the Company’s indebtedness seek to accelerate the indebtedness upon an event of default, the Company could be required to discontinue or significantly reduce the scope of its operations if no other means of financing its operations are or become available.

 

Contractual Obligations

 

As a smaller reporting company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, Abtech Holdings is not required to provide the information required by this item.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of December 31, 2017, we did not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material to investors.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations, including the discussion on liquidity and capital resources, are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments. Management bases the estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. For any given individual estimate or assumption we make, it is possible that other people applying reasonable judgment to the same facts and circumstances could develop different estimates. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

The going concern basis of presentation assumes we will continue in operation throughout the next fiscal year and into the foreseeable future and will be able to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As discussed above, certain conditions currently exist, which raise substantial doubt upon the validity of this assumption. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of the uncertainty.

 

  40  

 

 

The methods, estimates, interpretations, and judgments we use in applying our most critical accounting policies can have a significant impact on the results that we report in our consolidated financial statements. The SEC considers an entity’s most critical accounting policies to be those policies that are both most important to the portrayal of the entity’s financial condition and results of operations and those that require the entity’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain when estimated.

 

The following discussion provides supplemental information regarding the significant estimates, judgments and assumptions made in implementing the Company’s critical accounting policies.

 

Inventory valuation

 

The Company’s inventory is stated at the lesser of cost or market, with cost computed on an average cost method which approximates the first-in first-out basis. Provision is made for obsolete, slow-moving or defective items where appropriate. This estimated valuation requires that management make certain judgments about the likelihood that specific inventory items may have minimal or no realizable value in the future. These judgments are based on the current quantity of the item on hand compared to historical sales volumes, potential alternative uses of the products and the age of the inventory item.

 

Revenue recognition and allowance for doubtful accounts

 

There are four factors that the Company uses to determine the appropriate timing of the recognition of revenue. Three of these factors (evidence of arrangement exists, delivery occurs and fee is fixed or determinable) are generally factual considerations that are not subject to material estimates or assumptions. The fourth factor involves judgment regarding the collectability of the sales price. The Company only ships product when it has reasonable assurance that it will receive payment from the customer. When such assurance is not available, the Company will require payment in advance. The assessment of a customer’s credit-worthiness is reliant on management’s judgment regarding such factors as previous payment history, credit rating, credit references and market reputation. If any sales are made that ultimately become uncollectible, the Company charges the uncollected amount against a reserve for uncollectible accounts. This reserve is established and adjusted from time to time based on management’s assessment of each outstanding receivable and the likelihood of it being collected.

 

Stock-based compensation

 

The Company uses the Black-Sholes model to estimate the value of options and warrants issued to employees and consultants as compensation for services rendered to the Company. This model uses estimates of volatility, risk free interest rate and the expected term of the options or warrants, along with the current market price of the underlying stock, to estimate the value of the options and warrants on the date of grant. In addition, the calculation of compensation costs requires that the Company estimate the number of awards that will be forfeited during the vesting period. The fair value of the stock-based awards is amortized over the vesting period of the awards. For stock-based awards that vest based on performance conditions, expense is recognized when it is probable that the conditions will be met. There were no options granted by the Company during 2017 or 2016.

 

Accounting for conversion options and imputed interest

 

The convertible promissory notes issued by the Company provide the note holders an option to convert the notes into the Company’s common stock at a set price. The value of these options has not been bifurcated from the value of the related notes because management has determined that such bifurcation is not required under GAAP due to the specific terms of the conversion option and management’s estimate that the underlying shares would not be readily convertible into cash. However, whenever such conversion options represent a right to convert at a price that is less than the market price at the date of issuance, the Company imputes the value of such beneficial conversion feature and charges it to interest expense over the term of the notes.

 

  41  

 

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

See NOTE 1 – BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES to the consolidated financial statements included in this Report on Form 10-K for a detailed description of recent accounting pronouncements.

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK.

 

As a smaller reporting company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide the information required by this item.

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

 

Reference is made to the consolidated financial statements, the notes thereto and the report of our independent registered public accounting firm, commencing at page F-1 of this report, which consolidated financial statements, notes and report are incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENT WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

 

None.

 

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

 

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

 

  42  

 

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm due to our status as a smaller reporting company, pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

March 31, 2018

 

Glenn R. Rink Lane J. Castleton
President, Chief Executive Officer Vice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

During the quarter ended December 31, 2017, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

 

There were no items requiring reporting on Form 8-K that were not reported on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of the year covered by this Form 10-K.

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

 

The information required by this item will be set forth in, and is incorporated by reference to, the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or in a subsequent amendment to this report, which, in either case, we will file with the SEC within 120 days after our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

 

The information required by this item will be set forth in, and is incorporated by reference to, the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or in a subsequent amendment to this report, which, in either case, we will file with the SEC within 120 days after our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

The information required by this item will be set forth in, and is incorporated by reference to, the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or in a subsequent amendment to this report, which, in either case, we will file with the SEC within 120 days after our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

 

The information required by this item will be set forth in, and is incorporated by reference to, the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or in a subsequent amendment to this report, which, in either case, we will file with the SEC within 120 days after our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

 

  43  

 

 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

 

The information required by this item will be set forth in, and is incorporated by reference to, the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or in a subsequent amendment to this report, which, in either case, we will file with the SEC within 120 days after our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

 

PART IV

 

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

 

(a) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(1) Financial Statements are listed in the Index to Financial Statements on page F-1 of this report.

 

(b) Exhibits

 

2.1   Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 17, 2010, by and among the Registrant, Abtech Merger Sub, Inc., and AbTech Industries, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on July 22, 2010) [ Agreement Plan Of Merger 7-17-2010]
     
2.2   Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 17, 2010, by and among the Registrant, Abtech Merger Sub, Inc., and AbTech Industries, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on September 22, 2010) [Amendment Plan of Merger 9-17-2010]
     
3.1   Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on July 27, 2007, Registration No. 333-144923) [Certificate of Incorporation]
     
3.2   Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on July 27, 2007, Registration No. 333-144923) [ Articles of Incorporation]
     
3.3   Bylaws (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on July 27, 2007, Registration No. 333-144923) [Bylaws]
     
3.4   Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1(a) to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2010). Link: [Amendment Articles of Incorporation]
     
3.5   Certificate of Change to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2016) [Cert of Change to Articles]
     
4.1   Stock Specimen (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on July 27, 2007, Registration No. 333-144923) [ Stock Specimen]
     
4.2   Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 10, 2015) [Transfer Agent Agreement]

 

  44  

 

 

10.1   Transfer Agent Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2012) [Transfer Agent Agreement]
     
10.2   Form of Employment Agreement dated May 13, 2009, by and between Glenn R. Rink and AbTech Industries, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2011) [Employment Agreement Rink]
     
10.3   Employment Agreement dated May 13, 2009 by and between Lane J. Castleton and AbTech Industries, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2011) [Employment Agreement Castleton]
     
10.4   Form of Indemnification Agreement between Abtech Holdings, Inc. and each member of its Board of Directors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2011) [Indemnification Agreement]
     
10.5   AbTech Industries, Inc. 2007 Stock Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2011) [2007 Stock Plan]
     
10.6   Form of AbTech Industries, Inc. 2007 Incentive Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2011) [2007 Stock Option Agreement]
     
10.7   Form of AbTech Industries, Inc. 2007 Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2011) [2007 NQ Stock Option Agreement]
     
10.8   Form of AbTech Industries, Inc. Warrant Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2011) [ Form of Warrant]
     
10.9*   Offer letter to Robert C. Backman dated February 13, 2018.
     
21*   List of Subsidiaries
     
24.1   Power of Attorney (set forth on the signature pages of this Form 10-K)
     
31.1*   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
     
31.2*   Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
     
32**   Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
     
101.INS*   XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

* Filed Herewith
** Furnished Herewith

 

  45  

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  ABTECH HOLDINGS, INC.
   
Date: April 3, 2018 By: /s/ Glenn R. Rink
     Glenn R. Rink
      Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

Each individual whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints each of Glenn R. Rink and Lane J. Castleton such person's true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for such person and in such person's name, place, and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Form 10-K and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto each such attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as such person might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Date: April 3, 2018 By: /s/ Glenn R. Rink
    Glenn R. Rink
    Chief Executive Officer,
    President and Director (Principal Executive
    Officer)
     
Date: April 3, 2018 By: /s/ Lane J. Castleton
    Lane J. Castleton
    Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Secretary and
    Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and
    Principal Accounting Officer)
     
Date: April 3, 2018 By: /s/ William S. Brennan
    William S. Brennan, Director
     
Date: April 3, 2018 By: /s/ David Greenwald
    David Greenwald, Director
     
Date: April 3, 2018 By: /s/ A. Judson Hill
    A. Judson Hill, Director
     
Date: April 3, 2018 By: /s/ Dipak P. Jogia
    Dipak P. Jogia, Director

 

  46  

 

 

ABTECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016

 

 

 

CONTENTS

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F-2
   
Consolidated Balance Sheets F-3
   
Consolidated Statements of Operations F-4
   
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency) F-5
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows F-6
   
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements F-7 – 24

 

  F- 1  

 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Shareholders and Board of Directors

Abtech Holdings, Inc.

Scottsdale, Arizona

 

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Abtech Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company and subsidiaries at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Going Concern Uncertainty

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2010

 

Phoenix, Arizona

April 3, 2018

 

 

  F- 2  

 

 

ABTECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31,

 

 

 

    2017     2016  
ASSETS                
Current assets                
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 58,435     $ 84,415  
Accounts receivable – trade, net     36,650       45,842  
Inventories, net     326,679       342,117  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets     22,625       24,373  
Total current assets     444,389       496,747  
                 
Fixed assets, net     141,629       44,406  
Security deposits     17,977       28,402  
Total assets   $ 603,995     $ 569,555  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)                
Current liabilities                
Accounts payable   $ 1,401,637     $ 1,402,777  
Accounts payable – related party     -       1,101  
Loans from shareholder     9,000       9,000  
Bank line of credit     65,625       82,870  
Notes payable     250,000       250,000  
Convertible promissory notes     794,546       850,000  
Due to investors – related party     7,413,000       3,731,000  
Related party loan     65,102       -  
Capital lease obligation – current portion     12,651       -  
Accrued interest payable     1,005,983       364,080  
Accrued expenses     391,801       339,732  
Total current liabilities     11,409,345       7,030,560  
                 
Related party loan     -       71,949  
Capital lease obligation – noncurrent portion     33,612       -  
Total liabilities     11,442,957       7,102,509  
                 
Commitments and contingencies                
                 
Stockholders’ equity (deficiency)                
Common stock, $0.001 par  value; 800,000,000 authorized shares; 501,678,288 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016     501,678       501,678  
Additional paid-in capital     61,068,271       61,050,271  
Non-controlling interest     (4,724,713 )     (4,197,807 )
Accumulated deficit     (67,684,198 )     (63,887,096 )
Total stockholders’ equity (deficiency)     (10,838,962 )     (6,532,954 )
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficiency)   $ 603,995     $ 569,555  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

  F- 3  

 

 

ABTECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

 

 

 

    2017     2016  
             
Net revenues   $ 573,107     $ 309,956  
Cost of revenues     465,420       360,894  
Gross profit (loss)     107,687       (50,938 )
Selling, general and administrative expenses     2,831,282       3,390,608  
Research and development expenses     937,991       1,145,950  
Gain on disposal of fixed assets     (5,552 )     -  
Operating loss     (3,656,034 )     (4,587,496 )
Interest expense     (667,974 )     (252,760 )
Loss before income taxes     (4,324,008 )     (4,840,256 )
Provision for income taxes     -       -  
Net loss     (4,324,008 )     (4,840,256 )
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest     (526,906 )     (704,456 )
Net loss attributable to controlling interest   $ (3,797,102 )   $ (4,135,800 )
                 
Basic and diluted loss per common share   $ (0.01 )   $ (0.01 )
                 
Basic and diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding     501,678,288       501,678,288  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

  F- 4  

 

 

ABTECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

 

 

 

    Common Stock     Additional 
paid-in
    Accumulated     Non-
controlling 
       
    Shares     Amounts     capital     deficit     interest     Total  
Balance at December 31, 2015     501,678,288     $ 501,678     $ 61,027,567     $ (59,751,296 )   $ (3,493,351 )   $ (1,715,402 )
Stock-based compensation expense                     22,704                       22,704  
Net loss                             (4,135,800 )     (704,456 )     (4,840,256 )
Balance at December 31, 2016     501,678,288       501,678       61,050,271       (63,887,096 )     (4,197,807 )     (6,532,954 )
Stock-based compensation expense                     18,000                       18,000  
Net loss                             (3,797,102 )     (526,906 )     (4,324,008 )
Balance at December 31, 2017     501,678,288     $ 501,678     $ 61,068,271     $ (67,684,198 )   $ (4,724,713 )   $ (10,838,962 )

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

  F- 5  

 

 

ABTECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

 

 

 

    2017     2016  
Operating Activities                
Net loss   $ (4,324,008 )   $ (4,840,256 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:                
Depreciation     16,148       11,489  
Stock-based compensation expense     18,000       22,704  
Gain on sale of fixed assets     (5,552 )     -  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                
Accounts receivable     9,192       57,346  
Inventories, net     15,438       52,352  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets     1,748       221  
Accounts payable     (2,241 )     39,060  
Security deposits     10,425       -  
Accrued interest payable     641,903       214,697  
Accrued expenses     52,069       45,283  
Net cash used in operating activities     (3,566,878 )     (4,397,104 )
                 
Investing Activities                
Purchases of fixed assets     (63,648 )     (8,688 )
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets     10,000       -  
Net cash used in investing activities     (53,648 )     (8,688 )
                 
Financing Activities                
Proceeds from due to investors – related party     3,682,000       3,731,000  
Repayment of notes payable     (55,454 )     -  
Draws on bank line of credit     -       90,000  
Repayments on bank line of credit     (17,245 )     (7,130 )
Repayments under capital lease obligation     (7,908 )     -  
Net decrease in due to related party     (6,847 )     (6,523 )
Net cash provided by financing activities     3,594,546       3,807,347  
                 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents     (25,980 )     (598,445 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period     84,415       682,860  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period   $ 58,435     $ 84,415  
                 
Supplemental cash flow information:                
Cash paid for interest   $ 26,129     $ 37,342  
Cash paid for income taxes   $ -     $ -  
Noncash investing and financing activities:                
Transfer of deposit to fixed assets   $ -     $ 5,538  
Fixed asset purchased with a capital lease   $ 54,171     $ -  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

  F- 6  

 

 

ABTECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

 

NOTE 1 – BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Organization and Description of Business

 

Abtech Holdings, Inc. (“ABHD” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on February 13, 2007, with authorized capital stock of 300,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.001 par value. During 2015, the number of authorized shares of capital stock was increased to 800,000,000. ABHD is the parent holding company.

 

AbTech Industries, Inc. (“AbTech”), a Delaware corporation with an authorized capital of 15,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value common stock and 5,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value preferred stock, was acquired by ABHD in a reverse acquisition transaction (the “Merger”) on February 10, 2011. AbTech is a majority-owned subsidiary of ABHD and is the operating company.

 

AbTech is an environmental technologies firm that provides innovative solutions to address issues of water pollution. AbTech has developed and patented the Smart Sponge ® polymer technology. This technology’s oil absorbing capabilities make it highly effective as a filtration media to remove hydrocarbons and other pollutants from flowing or pooled water. AbTech has also licensed or developed other products that reduce bacteria, remove heavy metals or reduce the volume of polluted water through evaporation. AbTech sells products and systems for the treatment of stormwater, industrial process water and produced water in oil and gas extraction operations. The Company is headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona and has a manufacturing facility located in Phoenix, Arizona.

 

In 2012, the Company formed a subsidiary, AEWS Engineering, LLC (“AEWS”), an independent civil and environmental engineering firm, established to provide engineering and technology innovation to the water infrastructure sector. AEWS is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The operations of AEWS, which focused on new business development activities, were transferred to AbTech in 2015. During 2017, AEWS closed its office located in Raleigh, North Carolina and as of December 31, 2017, AEWS was dormant.

 

AbTech’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Environmental Security Corporation (“ESC”), was formed by the Company in 2003 to develop a sensor array technology designed to detect impurities in water flows. ESC owns a U.S. patent on this technology and has acquired rights to another monitoring technology, but otherwise had no operations during 2017 or 2016.

 

The Company operates in one business segment which is the filtration and treatment of polluted water.

 

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Financial Statement Presentation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ABHD, AbTech, AEWS and ESC. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The shares of AbTech preferred stock that have not converted to shares of ABHD common stock represent the non-controlling interest shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents – The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with a maturity of three months or less when acquired to be cash and cash equivalents.

 

  F- 7  

 

 

Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Significant estimates are used in determining the allowance for doubtful accounts and obsolete inventory and in valuing stock-based compensation. Due to the uncertainties inherent in the formulation of accounting estimates, and the significance of these items, it is reasonable to expect that the estimates in connection with these items could be materially revised within the next year.

 

Concentration of Credit Risk – Credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counter parties failed completely to perform as contracted. Concentrations of credit risk that arise from financial instruments exist for groups of customers or counter parties when they have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions described below.

 

· Cash and cash equivalents – Financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk are cash balances maintained in excess of federal depository insurance limits. While the Company does on occasion have cash balances in excess of federal depository insurance limits, at December 31, 2017, the Company’s cash or cash equivalent balances were within the limits federally insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. To date, the Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes the exposure is minimal.

 

· Major customers and accounts receivable – Major customers represent any customer that accounts for more than 10% of revenues for the year. During 2017, the Company had one customer that accounted for 23% of revenues and had an accounts receivable balance of zero at December 31, 2017. During 2016, the Company had one customer that accounted for 16% of revenues and had an accounts receivable balance of zero at December 31, 2016.

 

· Supplier – Major suppliers represent any vendor that accounts for more than 10% of purchases for the year. During 2017, the Company had one vendor that accounted for 52% of its purchases and had an accounts payable balance of zero at December 31, 2017. During 2016, the Company had three vendors that accounted for 35%, 16% and 15%, respectively, of its purchases. All of these vendors had an accounts payable balance of zero at December 31, 2016.

 

Fair Values of Financial Assets and Liabilities – The Company measures and discloses certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Authoritative guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Authoritative guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

 

  F- 8  

 

 

Inventories – Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost computed on an average cost method which approximates the first-in, first-out basis. Inventory costs include raw materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Provision is made for obsolete, slow-moving or defective items when appropriate. The amount of any provision is recognized as an expense in the period the provision occurs.

 

Warranty Accrual – The Company’s products are subject to warranty periods of one year or less. The warranty accrual (see NOTE 8 – ACCRUED EXPENSES) is based on management’s best estimate of expected costs associated with product failure and historical product failures. The Company has not incurred any significant warranty claims to date.

 

Fixed Assets – Fixed assets, stated at cost, are depreciated on the straight-line method for financial statement reporting purposes, over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to ten years. Leasehold improvement costs are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or their useful life. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Betterments or renewals are capitalized when they occur.

 

Revenue Recognition – The Company recognizes revenue only when all of the following criteria have been met:

 

· Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

· Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;

· The fee for the arrangement is fixed or determinable; and

· Collectability is reasonably assured.

 

Persuasive Evidence of an Arrangement – The Company documents all terms of an arrangement in a quote signed or confirmed by the customer prior to recognizing revenue.

 

Delivery Has Occurred or Services Have Been Performed – The Company performs all services or delivers all products prior to recognizing revenue. Services are considered to be performed when the services are complete.

 

The Fee for the Arrangement is Fixed or Determinable – Prior to recognizing revenue, a customer’s fee is either fixed or determinable under the terms of the quote or accepted customer purchase order.

 

Collectability Is Reasonably Assured – Collectability is assessed on a customer by customer basis based on criteria outlined by management.

 

In 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized revenue from the sale of its Smart Sponge ® and Smart Sponge Plus products, including Ultra-Urban ® Filters, Line Skimmers, Passive Skimmers and Smart Paks ® . The Smart Paks are usually sold as a component of an engineered system such as an end-of-pipe vault or other larger multi-product treatment train. The Company provides engineering design services on some engineered solutions. Revenues from design services are recognized at the time the engineering services are rendered. In 2016, the Company also recognized revenue from distributor fees charged for support of business development activities of the distributor. These revenues were recognized after the services were rendered and upon receipt of payment from the distributor.

 

The Company recognizes shipping and handling fees as revenue and the related expenses as a component of cost of sales. All internal handling charges are charged to selling, general and administrative expenses.

 

  F- 9  

 

 

The payment terms for sales made to customers vary based on the credit worthiness of the particular customer and the size of the order. Some orders require prepayment of up to 50% at the time the order is received, others require payment in full before shipping and others are made on terms requiring payment within 30 days of the date of shipment. Customers do not have a right of return for products purchased from the Company. The Company may on occasion allow a return under appropriate conditions to promote good business practices; however, such returns have been and are expected to be minimal. Regardless of when payment is received from the customer, revenues are recognized in accordance with the criteria for revenue recognition described above.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The allowances are calculated based on a detailed review of individual customer accounts, historical rates and an estimation of the overall economic conditions affecting the Company’s customer base. The Company reviews a customer’s credit history before extending credit. If the financial condition of its customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. The Company charges off uncollectible receivables when all reasonable collection efforts have been taken. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $16,000 at December 31, 2017 and 2016.

 

Customer Deposits – The Company occasionally receives prepayments or deposits from customers for products they order or intend to order. In such cases the prepayment or deposit is initially recorded as a liability (customer deposits) and is only recognized as revenue when the ordered products are shipped and the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the customer.

 

Cost Recognition – Cost of revenues includes all direct material and labor costs and those indirect costs of bringing raw materials to sale condition, including depreciation of equipment used in manufacturing and shipping and handling costs. Selling, general, and administrative costs are charged to operating expenses as incurred. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and are included in operating expenses. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. The Company had advertising expenses of $7,268 and $3,000 for 2017 and 2016, respectively.

 

Long-Lived Assets – The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. When indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amount, the Company measures the amount of such impairment by comparing the assets' carrying value to the assets' present value of the expected future discounted cash flows. Impairment charges, if any, are recorded in the period realized.

 

Income Taxes – Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established to reduce a deferred tax asset to the amount expected to be realized. The Company assesses its ability to realize deferred tax assets based on current earnings performance and on projections of future taxable income in the relevant tax jurisdictions. These projections do not include taxable income from the reversal of deferred tax liabilities and do not reflect a general growth assumption but do consider known or pending events, such as the passage of legislation. The Company’s estimates of future taxable income are reviewed annually. All tax positions are first analyzed to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes. After the initial analysis, the tax benefit is measured as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Our income tax returns are subject to adjustment under audit for approximately the last four years.

 

  F- 10  

 

 

If the Company is required to pay interest on the underpayment of income taxes, the Company recognizes interest expense in the first period the interest becomes due according to the provisions of the relevant tax law.

 

If the Company is subject to payment of penalties, the Company recognizes an expense for the amount of the statutory penalty in the period when the position is taken on the income tax return. If the penalty was not recognized in the period when the position was initially taken, the expense is recognized in the period when the Company changes its judgment about meeting minimum statutory thresholds related to the initial position taken.

 

Stock-Based Compensation – All share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are expensed based on their estimated fair values at grant date, in accordance with ASC 718.

 

Compensation expense for stock options is recorded ratably over the vesting period using the estimated fair value on the date of grant, as calculated by the Company using the Black-Scholes model. The Company classifies all share-based awards as equity instruments.

 

See NOTE 11 for a description of the Company’s share-based compensation plan and information related to awards granted under the plan.

 

Net Loss Per Share – Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The Company has other potentially dilutive securities outstanding that are not shown in a diluted net loss per share calculation because their effect in both 2017 and 2016 would be anti-dilutive. The following chart lists the securities as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 that were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share because their effect would have been antidilutive:

 

    Common Shares  
    December 31, 2017     December 31, 2016  
Options to purchase common stock     3,099,194       3,647,240  
Warrants to purchase common stock     8,800,737       10,952,386  
Shares issuable upon conversion of debt     3,097,353       4,377,948  
Convertible preferred stock in AbTech     6,457,467       6,457,467  
      21,454,751       25,435,041  

 

Conversion Options – The Company will bifurcate conversion options embedded in financial instruments and account for them at fair value if required. Currently, the Company has determined that none of its embedded conversion options require bifurcation.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “ Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) ,” which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The core principle of ASU No. 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU No. 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08 which further clarifies the guidance on the principal versus agent considerations within ASU No. 2014-09. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10 to expand the guidance on identifying performance obligations and licensing within ASU No. 2014-09. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12 to improve revenue recognition in the areas of collectability, presentation of sales tax and other similar taxes collected from customers, noncash consideration, contract modifications and completed contracts at transition. This update also amends the disclosure requirements within ASU No. 2014-09 for entities that retrospectively apply the guidance. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients, or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU No. 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption. The Company intends to use the cumulative effect approach in adopting the new standard. However, based on the Company’s historical and current revenue transactions, the new standard is unlikely to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements until such time as the Company begins to generate material revenues through contracts with customers that are the subject of ASU No. 2014-09.

 

  F- 11  

 

 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “ Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments and affects all entities that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities. The update takes effect for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the new standard and believes that it will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “ Leases (Topic 842),” which, among other provisions, requires lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for those leases classified as operating leases under previous GAAP. Under this new provision, a lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years for public entities. The Company has various operating leases and expects that these amendments will significantly affect the manner in which such operating leases are presented in its consolidated financial statements. While the Company expects the amendment to have a minimal effect on the amount of operating expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations, the amendment will result in the Company including on its balance sheet a right to use asset and a corresponding liability for the lease payments due under operating leases in effect at the balance sheet dates.

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “ Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The standard will take effect for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the new standard which will apply to the estimation of credit losses on the Company’s trade receivables, but it is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s measurement of such credit losses.

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “ Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,” which addresses how eight specific cash flow issues should be presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted and the amendments are to be applied using a retrospective transition method. The Company is currently evaluating the new standard and its potential impact on the Company’s presentation of the relevant cash flow items in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

 

In June 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting,” which provides guidance on which changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards require an entity to apply modification accounting in ASC Topic 718. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and for interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is allowed. The Company is currently evaluating the new standard, but it is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

  F- 12  

 

 

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

 

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenue sufficient to cover its operating costs and has incurred net losses since its inception. These losses, with the associated substantial accumulated deficit, are a direct result of the Company’s product development activities, the costs of introducing its technologies to the market and pursuing market acceptance and, more recently, substantial legal expenses. In addition, the Company has a working capital deficit of approximately $11 million as of December 31, 2017, with approximately $9.5 million of debt and accrued interest that will become due in 2018 or is due on demand. Realization of a major portion of the assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which in turn is dependent upon the Company’s ability to meet its financing requirements and the success of its future operations. The Company operates in a new, developing industry with a variety of competitors. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. As a result, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm included an emphasis-of-matter paragraph with respect to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, expressing uncertainty regarding the Company’s assumption that it will continue as a going concern.

 

In order to continue as a going concern, management believes the Company will need to generate additional revenue through sales growth in the short term, raise additional capital to fund its operating losses and service its debt and resolve the legal matters described in NOTE 15 – CONTINGENCIES, LITIGATION, CLAIMS AND ASSESSMENTS. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are described as follows:

 

Sales and Marketing . Historically, the Company has generated revenues by selling its products directly to end customers, through distributors in key geographic markets and in recent years through alliances to penetrate key market segments such as municipal stormwater, federal facilities and industrial process water. The Company, including AEWS, pursued contracts that would enable it to bring its stormwater expertise to bear in all phases of rebuilding projects, including the design, installation and operation of water treatment systems. The Company signed its first contract for such a project with the County of Nassau in October 2013. After more than a year of work on this project which progressed slowly and was hampered by many delays, the contract was suspended by Nassau County in May 2015, following the announcement of the federal investigation of a state senator, Dean Skelos, and his son Adam Skelos, who had acted as a consultant to the Company. As a consequence of the negative publicity for the Company surrounding these events, the Company began to direct a greater portion of its sales efforts towards non-stormwater applications of its products in commercial and industrial markets, while continuing to support stormwater product sales through direct sales staff and through distributors in international markets. The Company hired a team of seasoned sales professionals with extensive experience in industrial markets in order to help facilitate sales growth. The Company has made strides to develop or refine products for these new markets intended to provide effective solutions for the treatment of produced water in the mining and drilling (fracking) industries, filtration of process water used in industrial applications and the filtration of heavy metals from water in a variety of applications. Management believes that these developments show promise for future revenues through sales growth once the products and systems being developed for these markets are proven and refined, although no assurance can be given that such future sales growth will occur.

 

  F- 13  

 

 

Financing. To date, the Company has financed its operations primarily with loans from shareholders, private placement financings and sales revenue. During 2017, the Company received $3,682,000 in cash advances from two of its major stockholders. Terms for these loans have not been formalized; however, the Company has treated the loans as debt accruing interest at 10% per annum. While it is possible that such loans will be converted into purchases of common stock of the Company, there is no assurance that such conversions will occur. The Company expects to continue to finance its operations, as needed, with loans from shareholders, however, there is no assurance such loans from these related parties will continue in the future or be sufficient to cover the costs of our operations.

 

Management believes that upon validation of its water treatment solutions for the stormwater, industrial and commercial markets, and if economic conditions improve in the Company’s target markets, sales revenue can grow significantly, which would enable the Company to reverse its negative cash flow from operations and raise additional capital as needed to service debt and fund operations. However, there is no assurance that the Company’s overall efforts will be successful. If the Company is unable to generate significant sales growth in the near term and raise additional capital, there is a risk that the Company could default on debt maturing during 2018. There can be no assurance that noteholders will grant additional maturity date extensions or waive any default provisions of our outstanding notes or that we will be able to timely refinance or repay such notes. Further, the Company is currently in default on notes that matured in April 2017; however, the Company is currently in discussions with the noteholder to extend the maturity date. There can be no assurances that the noteholder will not elect to exercise his default remedies under the notes and the Company does not currently have sufficient liquidity to repay the indebtedness. While the Company does not expect the noteholder to accelerate the indebtedness, the noteholder may do so at any time, or may initiate foreclosure actions, or seek any other remedies permitted by the terms of the notes and applicable law. Should the holders of the Company’s indebtedness seek to accelerate the indebtedness upon an event of default, the Company could be required to discontinue or significantly reduce the scope of its operations if no other means of financing its operations are or become available. Consequently, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that these consolidated financial statements are issued. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities or any other adjustment that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

NOTE 3 – INVENTORIES

 

Inventories consist of the following at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

 

    2017     2016  
Raw materials   $ 117,048     $ 99,182  
Work in process     243,810       279,045  
Finished goods     28,821       26,890  
Reserve for obsolescence     (63,000 )     (63,000 )
Total   $ 326,679     $ 342,117  

 

  F- 14  

 

 

NOTE 4 – FIXED ASSETS

 

Fixed assets consist of the following at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

 

    2017     2016  
Furniture and fixtures   $ 130,500     $ 135,804  
Computer equipment     41,428       62,630  
Machinery and equipment     383,717       270,534  
Leasehold improvements     22,548       31,830  
Total cost     578,193       500,798  
Less accumulated depreciation     (436,564 )     (456,392 )
Net book value   $ 141,629     $ 44,406  

 

Depreciation expense charged to operations during 2017 and 2016 was $16,148 and $11,489, respectively.

 

NOTE 5 – COMMITMENTS

 

Capital Leases – In 2017, the Company entered into a capital lease for the purchase of manufacturing equipment with a cost of $54,171. Depreciation expense on this equipment was $3,157 in 2017, which was the balance of accumulated depreciation at December 31, 2017. The Company had no other capital leases at December 31, 2017 or 2016. Minimum future lease payments and present values of the net minimum lease payments for this capital lease are as follows:

 

Year ended December 31:      
2018   $ 15,793  
2019     15,793  
2020     15,793  
2021     5,264  
Total minimum lease payments due     52,643  
Less: sales tax amounts     -  
Net minimum lease payments     52,643  
Less:  imputed interest     6,380  
Present value of net minimum lease payments     46,263  
Less: current portion     12,651  
Capital lease obligation noncurrent portion   $ 33,612  

 

Operating Leases – The Company leases office and warehouse space, office equipment and an automobile under various noncancelable operating leases that extend through October 2018. Total rental expense charged to operations during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, were $330,731 and $383,923, respectively. Because some of the Company’s leases contain escalating lease payments during their terms, the Company recognizes rental expense for these leases as a straight-line amortization of the total lease expense to be paid over the term of the leases. The difference between the amount of rent expensed and the amount of rent actually paid under the leases is included in accrued expenses as deferred rent (see NOTE 8 – ACCRUED EXPENSES). Future annual minimum lease payments for the next five years, under noncancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more, as of December 31, 2017, are as follows:

 

Year   2018     2019     2020     2021     2022     Thereafter     Total  
Amount   $ 162,866     $          -     $          -     $          -     $          -     $          -     $ 162,866  

 

  F- 15  

 

 

Indemnification Agreements - The Company enters into indemnification provisions under its agreements with officers and directors and companies in its ordinary course of business, typically with business partners, customers, landlords, lenders and lessors. Under these provisions the Company generally indemnifies and holds harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of the Company’s activities or, in some cases, as a result of the indemnified party’s activities under the agreement. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is unlimited. The Company has not incurred material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements. As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

 

Other Commitments – The Company has commitments for research and development activities with minimum future payments as follows:

 

Year   2018     2019     2020     2021     2022     Thereafter     Total  
Amount   $ 158,078     $ 62,118     $ 12,118     $ 12,118     $ 12,118     $ 1,010     $ 257,560  

 

NOTE 6 – LOANS FROM SHAREHOLDER

 

Loans from shareholder at December 31, 2017 and 2016 represents a $9,000 demand loan made by a prior Director of the Company to the Company’s subsidiary, ESC. This loan is unsecured and non-interest bearing.

 

NOTE 7 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

Accounts payable; related party – At December 31, 2016, Accounts payable – related party represents amounts owed to executives of the Company for travel expenses.

 

Related party loan – Represents amounts owed to a related company for services provided in the form of office and clerical support, and cash advances. On December 31, 1998, the Company executed a loan document in the amount of $127,353, with an original maturity date of December 31, 2003 (extended to December 31, 2018), with interest accruing at the rate of 5% per annum until the loan is paid in full. The Company may repay the note in part or in full at any time prior to maturity. In the event of default of principal or interest, the entire unpaid balance, including principal and interest, will be due and payable without notice, with interest accruing at 8% from the date of default. The outstanding balance on this loan was $65,102 and $71,949 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

 

Cash Advances – During 2017, two investors considered to be related parties because they individually beneficially own greater than 5% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock, made cash advances to the Company totaling $3,682,000, as short-term loans. During 2016, these same related party investors made similar cash advances to the Company totaling $3,731,000. These cash advances are reported as “Due to investor – related party” on the consolidated balance sheets. The specific terms of these loans have not yet been determined. However, the Company is accruing interest on these loans at a rate of 10% per annum, which accrued interest totaled approximately $709,000 and $146,000 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

 

NOTE 8 – ACCRUED EXPENSES

 

Accrued expenses consist of the following at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

 

    2017     2016  
Accrued payroll and commissions   $ 46,852     $ 37,176  
Deferred rent     7,291       34,847  
Accrued vacation     61,285       55,025  
Accrued director compensation     269,375       206,750  
Accrued warranty reserve     5,000       5,000  
Other accruals     1,998       934  
    $ 391,801     $ 339,732  

 

  F- 16  

 

 

NOTE 9 – INCOME TAXES

 

There is no current or deferred tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 due to the Company’s loss position and the full reserve taken on the Company’s deferred tax asset in both years.

 

A reconciliation of statutory rates is as follows at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

 

    2017     2016  
Statutory rate     21.0 %     34.0 %
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit     3.9 %     3.6 %
Reduction for valuation allowance related to net operating loss carry-forwards and change in permanent differences     -24.9 %     -37.6 %
      0.0 %     0.0 %

 

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

 

    2017     2016  
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):                
Net operating loss carryforwards   $ 14,138,000     $ 20,381,000  
Accumulated depreciation     (11,000 )     15,000  
Less valuation allowance     (14,127,000 )     (20,396,000 )
Net deferred tax assets   $ -     $ -  

 

The change in the federal statutory tax rate enacted in late 2017 resulted in a deferred tax asset reduction of approximately $6,269,000 during the year ended December 31, 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the net deferred tax benefit was approximately $1,494,000. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had federal loss carryforwards of approximately $58.5 million and $55.0 million, respectively, and state loss carryforwards of approximately $30.5 million and $27.1 million, respectively, which may be available to reduce future taxes, if any. The state net operating loss carryforwards expire starting in 2032 through 2037. The federal net operating loss carryforwards expire starting in 2018 through 2037. The net change in the total valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2017 was a net decrease of approximately $6,269,000 and for the year ended December 31, 2016, a net increase of $1,494,000. Based on the Company’s loss position and the uncertainty of the amount and timing of future taxable income, management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will not fully realize the benefit of its net deferred tax assets. Pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 382, annual utilization of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards may be limited if a cumulative change in ownership of more than 50% is deemed to occur within any three-year period. Because the deferred tax asset is fully reserved, the Company has not fully analyzed whether such limitation has occurred at this time. However, given the equity issuances in 2015, it is likely that a section 382 limitation has been incurred.

 

  F- 17  

 

 

NOTE 10 – PROMISSORY NOTES AND OTHER DEBT

 

Information regarding the various promissory notes that were outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 is set forth in the table below:

 

    Principal Amount     Interest         Conversion  
    2017     2016     Rate     Maturity Date   Rate  
Current promissory notes                                    
Secured note   $ 250,000     $ 250,000       11.5 %   4/15/16 (2)     N/A  
Secured, convertible note     44,546       100,000       11.5 %   4/30/18 (1)   $ 0.032  
Unsecured, convertible note     250,000       250,000       6.5 %   4/15/16 (2)   $ 0.53  
Unsecured, convertible note     500,000       500,000       6.5 %   4/15/16 (2)   $ 0.64  
Total promissory notes   $ 1,044,546     $ 1,100,000                      

 

(1) On October 21, 2016, the Company and the holder of this note mutually agreed to amend the note by: (i) extending the maturity date from April 12, 2016 to October 31, 2017; (ii) continuing the interest rate at 11.5% per annum through the new maturity date; (iii) obligating the Company to make monthly payments on the note of $10,000 per month beginning in November 2016; and (iv) adding a conversion feature to the note that allows the note holder to convert the unpaid balance due under the note into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of $0.032 per share.

 

On July 17, 2017, the Company and the holder of this note mutually agreed to further amend the note by: (a) extending the maturity date from October 31, 2017 to November 15, 2017; (b) granting to the holder of the note a right to convert the entire outstanding unpaid balance of the note, including any unpaid accrued interest thereon, into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of $0.015 per share through November 15, 2017; and (c) tolling the Company’s obligation to make monthly payments on the note until after November 15, 2017, at which time, the maturity date would be further extended and the Company would resume making payments of $10,000 per month until the note is paid in full.

 

On February 27, 2018, the Company and the holder of this note mutually agreed to further amend the note by: (a) extending the maturity date from November 15, 2017 to April 30, 2018; and (b) further tolling the Company’s obligation to make monthly payments on the note until after April 30, 2018, at which time, if the note has not been settled by conversion or otherwise, the maturity date will be further extended and the Company will resume making payments of $10,000 per month until the note is paid in full.

 

(2) In March 2017, the Company and the holder of these notes mutually agreed to extend the maturity dates of these notes to April 30, 2017, thus curing the technical default of the notes that had occurred on the prior maturity dates of May 11, 2016 for the secured note and April 15, 2016 for the unsecured notes. As of December 31, 2017, these notes were once again in technical default. However, the note holder has not declared an event of default. The Company is attempting to further extend the maturity dates on these notes. However, the Company gives no assurance that an agreement to extend such maturity dates will be achieved.

 

The convertible promissory notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the indicated conversion rates. The secured notes have a security interest in all of the personal property and other assets of the Company. The note discounts resulting from warrants issued with the notes and any beneficial conversion features inherent in the convertible notes, were fully amortized prior to 2016.

 

Bank Line of Credit

 

The Company has a bank line of credit with a credit limit of $100,000. This line of credit has an annual interest rate of prime plus 6.75% (11.25% as of December 31, 2017) and requires monthly payment of any interest due plus approximately 1% of the outstanding balance. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the outstanding balance due on the bank line of credit was $65,625 and $82,870, respectively.

 

  F- 18  

 

 

Due to Investors

 

The amount shown in the consolidated balance sheets as due to investors represents short-term loans made to the Company by related party investors (see NOTE 7 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS – Private Placements ). The terms of these loans have not yet been determined. However, the Company is accruing interest on the outstanding balance of the loans at a rate of 10% per annum, which management believes will approximate the final negotiated rate.

 

NOTE 11 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 

Stock Options

 

The Company grants stock options to officers, directors, employees and consultants under stock plans.

 

AbTech’s 2007 Stock Plan – Prior to the Merger with ABHD, AbTech issued stock options under a plan (the “2007 Stock Plan”) that allowed up to 15% of the capital stock outstanding of AbTech to be available for awards granted under the plan. Options granted under the plan expire on the earlier of the stated expiration date or, in the case of incentive stock options, ninety days after the date employment ends or, in the case of non-statutory options, 30 days after the optionee ceases to be a service provider to the Company. The stated expiration dates occur between 2018 and 2020. Stock options were granted at the fair market value of the common stock as determined by the Board of Directors on the date of grant and are exercisable subject to vesting provisions and performance objectives. All stock options granted by AbTech outstanding as of the date of the reverse acquisition transaction with ABHD automatically converted into options for the purchase of shares of ABHD common stock at the rate of 5.32 shares of ABHD stock for each share of AbTech stock. Upon the exercise of any of these AbTech stock options, ABHD will issue new authorized shares of its common stock.

 

ABHD’s 2012 Incentive Stock Plan – In May 2012, the shareholders of ABHD approved the 2012 Incentive Stock Plan (the “2012 Plan”), which allows for up to 9,000,000 shares of common stock awards to be granted during the term of the plan. The exercise price of options granted under the 2012 Plan is determined by the 2012 Plan Committee and may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock of ABHD on the grant date. Options expire not more than 10 years from the date of grant.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, compensation expense of $18,000 and $22,704, respectively, for stock options accounted for under ASC 718, is included in Selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations. There was no related tax benefit recognized due to the Company’s loss position. At December 31, 2017, the Company had approximately $4,500 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of less than one year. During 2017 and 2016, no stock options were exercised.

 

Compensation expense is determined from the estimates of fair values of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. There were no options granted in 2017 or 2016.

 

The Company’s stock option activity for the years ending December 31, 2017 and 2016 is summarized below (all share amounts for options granted by AbTech have been restated to give effect to the merger exchange ratio and reflect the equivalent number of ABHD shares):

 

  F- 19  

 

 

AbTech Options

 

    Number of
AbTech Shares
Under Option
    Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
    Weighted
Average
Remaining Term
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2015     755,977     $ 0.70       2.1  
Expired or forfeited     (239,570 )     0.70          
Outstanding at December 31, 2016     516,407       0.70       1.9  
Expired or forfeited     (346,046 )     0.70          
Outstanding at December 31, 2017     170,361     $ 0.70       2.8  

 

As of December 31, 2017, there were 170,361 stock options outstanding and exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $0.70, a weighted average remaining life of 2.8 years and an intrinsic value of zero.

 

ABHD Options

 

    Number of
ABHD Shares
Under Option
    Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
    Weighted
Average
Remaining Term
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2015     4,620,833     $ 0.48       5.6  
Expired or forfeited     (1,490,000 )     0.44          
Outstanding at December 31, 2016     3,130,833       0.49       4.3  
Expired or forfeited     (202,000 )     0.56          
Outstanding at December 31, 2017     2,928,833     $ 0.48       3.5  

 

As of December 31, 2017, the 2,928,833 stock options outstanding had an intrinsic value of zero. As of December 31, 2017, there were approximately 2,913,833 stock options exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $0.48, a weighted average remaining life of 3.5 years and an intrinsic value of zero. The 15,000 non-exercisable stock options outstanding at December 31, 2017, vest over time in 2018.

 

The following table summarizes the activity of the shares and weighted-average grant date fair value of the Company’s non-vested common stock options during the years ending December 31, 2017 and 2016:

 

    Non-vested ABHD Shares  
    Number of
Shares
    Weighted-
average
grant date
fair value
 
Non-Vested at December 31, 2015     275,000     $ 0.32  
Granted     -       -  
Vested     (75,000 )     0.30  
Expired or forfeited     (95,000 )     0.31  
Non-Vested at December 31, 2016     105,000     $ 0.34  
Granted     -       -  
Vested     (60,000 )     0.30  
Expired or forfeited     (30,000 )     0.43  
Non-Vested at December 31, 2017     15,000     $ 0.30  

 

Common stock

 

During 2017 and 2016, the Company issued no new shares of common stock.

 

  F- 20  

 

 

Warrants

 

There were no warrants issued by the Company in 2017. During 2016, the Company exercised the second maturity date extension options on two of the promissory notes issued in 2014, resulting in the number of warrant shares for the corresponding warrants issued with the promissory notes increasing by 17,500 shares. The value of these warrants was negligible due to the high exercise price of the warrants relative to the fair market price of ABHD shares on the date the warrant shares were issued.

 

A summary of warrants to purchase common stock outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:

 

    AbTech Warrants     ABHD Warrants  
    Number of
Warrants
    Weighted-
average
Exercise Price
    Number of
Warrants
    Weighted-
average
Exercise Price
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2015     141,969     $ 0.70       13,532,842       0.41  
Granted     -       -       17,500       0.33  
Exercised     -       -       -       -  
Expired     (141,969 )     0.70       (2,597,956 )     0.63  
Outstanding at December 31, 2016     -       -       10,952,386     $ 0.36  
Granted     -       -       -       -  
Exercised     -       -       -       -  
Expired     -       -       (2,151,649 )     0.68  
Outstanding at December 31, 2017     -     $ -       8,800,737       0.28  

 

The 8,800,737 exercisable ABHD warrants outstanding at December 31, 2017 expire at various dates through 2020 and have a weighted average remaining life of 1.6 years.

 

AbTech Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

 

AbTech has designated 3,500,000 of its 5,000,000 authorized preferred shares as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Stock”) and has 1,212,947 of such shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017. These shares represent the non-controlling interest in the Company’s subsidiary as shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations. Series A Stock has a par value of $0.01 and no liquidation or dividend preferences.

 

The holders of Series A Stock may at any time elect to convert any or all such shares into common shares of AbTech at a conversion rate initially set at one share of AbTech common stock for each share of Series A Stock, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments that protect Series A Stockholders if AbTech issues new shares at less than $3.75 per share. The Series A Stock will automatically convert into common shares upon either (a) the closing of a firm underwritten public offering, (b) subsequent listing on the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ Global Market, or (c) upon the sale or transfer of substantially all the assets or the consolidation or merger with an entity solely for cash or solely for cash and securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ Global Market. While Series A Stockholders have no voting rights as ABHD stockholders, they do have specific rights pertaining to the governance of AbTech, ABHD’s subsidiary.

 

  F- 21  

 

 

Common shares reserved for future issuance

 

ABHD common shares reserved for future issuance were as follows as of December 31 (all shares are stated in ABHD share equivalents):

 

    2017     2016  
Options to purchase common stock     3,099,194       3,647,240  
Warrants to purchase common stock     8,800,737       10,952,386  
Shares issuable upon conversion of debt     3,097,353       4,377,948  
Convertible preferred stock in AbTech     6,457,467       6,457,467  
      21,454,751       25,435,041  

 

NOTE 12 – PRIVATE PLACEMENTS

 

The Company did not complete any private placements during 2017 or 2016. However, during 2017 and 2016 the Company received short-term funding of $3,682,000 and $3,731,000, respectively, from two related party investors. The Company and the related party investors are currently working out the terms for these funded amounts (see NOTE 10 – PROMISSORY NOTES AND OTHER DEBT – Due to Investors).

 

NOTE 13 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, capital leases, due to investors, bank line of credit, notes payable and convertible notes payable. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying values, using level 3 inputs, based on their short maturities, or for long-term debt, based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms and maturities. Gains and losses recognized on changes in fair value of financial instruments, if any, are reported in other income (expense) as gain (loss) on change in fair value. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had no financial instruments outstanding that were estimated using level 1, level 2 or level 3 inputs, other than discussed above.

 

NOTE 14 – CONTINGENCIES, LITIGATION, CLAIMS AND ASSESSMENTS

 

On May 28, 2015, the Company received a subpoena from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that stated that the staff of the SEC is conducting an investigation In the Matter of Abtech Holdings, Inc. (NY-9262) .  Generally, the SEC’s subpoena asked for all documents, agreements, and communications concerning (i) the Company’s Contract for Services with Nassau County, New York, dated October 8, 2013; (ii) Dean Skelos, his son, Adam Skelos, who acted as a consultant to the Company, and their related entities; (iii) SLC Clean Water, LLC, Axiom, Glenwood Management, and a number of other listed individuals and entities; (iv) certain Board and Board committee minutes and related materials; (v) certain policies, procedures, and internal controls in effect at the Company; (vi) certain communications with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, transfer agent, potential and current investors, broker-dealers, investment advisors, and finders; and (vii) certain other organizational and financial account information of the Company.  The Company has provided a substantial number of documents in response to the SEC subpoena.  In 2016 and 2017, the SEC issued additional subpoenas pertaining to this investigation to two officers, a director, a prior director, a prior employee of the Company, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and several law firms who have counseled the Company from 2013 to the present.

 

  F- 22  

 

 

The Company believes the SEC’s subpoenas are a result of the complaint announced on May 4, 2015 that was filed by federal authorities against Dean and Adam Skelos. That trial came to an end in December 2015 when both men were convicted of eight counts each, including fraud, bribery and extortion of three separate companies – one of which was the Company. The Company cooperated fully with the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York throughout the Skelos investigation and trial, by providing subpoenaed documents and other evidence and having the Company’s president and CEO testify on behalf of the government at the trial. In September 2017, a federal appeals panel overturned the 2015 corruption convictions of Dean Skelos and Adam Skelos. The Company is uncertain at this point if it will have any further involvement in this matter.

 

The investigation by the SEC is ongoing and no resolution can be predicted at this time. We have not yet recorded a liability related to the cost of resolving this matter although we have incurred and recognized material compliance costs to date. At this time, no estimate of the possible loss or range of loss can be made. In the meantime, we are continuing to incur significant legal fees for compliance with the SEC subpoenas.

 

In May 2016, the Company, AEWS and AbTech received letters from the New York State Joint Commission on Public Ethics (“JCOPE”) asking for a written response to allegations constituting potential violations of lobbying laws in the state of New York. The Company’s legal counsel provided a written response to JCOPE on May 31, 2016, wherein they presented the Company’s position that it has consistently complied with all applicable lobbying laws. On August 15, 2016, JCOPE issued notices to the Company, AbTech and AEWS that JCOPE had decided to commence an investigation to determine whether a substantial basis exists to conclude that the Company violated lobbying laws in the state of New York. The Company intends to defend its position that it has consistently complied with all applicable lobbying laws and is working with JCOPE to resolve this matter. However, it is not clear at this time how the matter will ultimately be resolved.

 

In accordance with the stockholder proposal approved by the Company’s stockholders at the May 13, 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Stockholder Proposal”), the Company engaged legal counsel to assess whether the Company should pursue legal action to recover financial losses and damages pertaining to the United States vs. Dean Skelos and Adam Skelos case. The Company, through its legal counsel, is currently in discussions with one entity regarding damages claimed by the Company. However, it cannot be determined at this time how this matter will ultimately be resolved.

 

As of December 31, 2017, the Company had incurred approximately $3,490,000 in legal fees and other costs related to the matters described above, including approximately $1,431,000 incurred during 2017. The Company cannot estimate at this time the cost of additional legal representation in resolving the SEC investigation, the JCOPE investigation or pursuing legal action pursuant to the Stockholder Proposal.

 

The Company has filed a claim for coverage for some of these legal fees under a liability insurance policy. The insurer denied the claim and the Company engaged legal counsel to dispute the insurer’s denial of the claim. After an unsuccessful attempt to resolve the dispute through mediation, the Company filed a formal complaint against the insurer on July 11, 2016, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In December 2016, the insurer remitted a payment to the Company of $465,187 for a portion of the claim that the insurer determined to be covered by the policy. During 2017, the insurer remitted additional payments totaling $1,138,984 to the Company, or directly to the applicable law firms, for legal fees related to these matters. The payments made by the insurer were offset against other selling, general and administrative operating expenses in the periods in which such payments were received. The ultimate outcome of the litigation with the insurer cannot be determined at this time.

 

NOTE 15 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the Company received additional short-term funding of $785,000 from two investors considered to be a related party because they individually have a beneficial ownership interest in the Company of greater than 5%, bringing the total due to investors for these short-term loans in 2016, 2017 and 2018 to $8,198,000. The Company and the related party investors are currently working out the terms for these funded amounts (see NOTE 10 – PROMISSORY NOTES AND OTHER DEBT – Due to Investors).

 

  F- 23  

 

 

In February 2018, the Company amended a secured, convertible promissory note with an unpaid principal amount of $44,546, which was outstanding and in technical default as of December 31, 2017, by extending its maturity date as described in NOTE 10 – PROMISSORY NOTES AND OTHER DEBT. Accordingly, this note was not in technical default as of the filing date.

 

In March 2018, a holder of AbTech preferred stock converted 600,000 of such preferred shares into 600,000 shares of AbTech common stock and then converted these AbTech common shares into 3,194,270 shares of ABHD common stock in accordance with the terms of the Merger between AbTech and ABHD. This conversion reduced the number of AbTech preferred shares outstanding to 612,947 and reduced the minority interest of preferred shareholders in AbTech Industries from approximately 15.3% to 8.5%.

 

NOTE 16 – QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

 

    First Quarter     Second Quarter     Third Quarter     Fourth Quarter  
Year ended December 31, 2017:                                
Net revenues   $ 106,562     $ 88,048     $ 311,952     $ 66,545  
Gross profit (loss)     (2,655 )     (672 )     154,227       (43,213 )
Operating loss     (1,570,379 )     (246,480 )     (807,247 )     (1,031,928 )
Net loss     (1,699,682 )     (400,722 )     (988,441 )     (1,235,163 )
Basic and diluted loss per share   $ 0.00     $ 0.00     $ 0.00     $ 0.00  
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding     501,678,288       501,678,288       501,678,288       501,678,288  
                                 
Year ended December 31, 2016:                                
Net revenues   $ 42,637     $ 64,027     $ 53,730     $ 149,562  
Gross profit (loss)     (34,721 )     (24,394 )     (35,080 )     43,257  
Operating loss     (1,458,897 )     (1,366,467 )     (1,157,027 )     (605,105 )
Net loss     (1,483,555 )     (1,414,618 )     (1,230,311 )     (711,772 )
Basic and diluted loss per share   $ 0.00     $ 0.00     $ 0.00     $ 0.00  
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding     501,678,288       501,678,288       501,678,288       501,678,288  

 

  F- 24