Indicate by check mark if the registrant
is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant
is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of
delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy information statements incorporated by reference
in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K.
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth
company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company”
and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
If an emerging growth company, indicate
by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
¨
Yes
x
No
State the aggregate market value of the
voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last
sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently
completed second fiscal quarter: $1,296,130.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding
of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of March 30, 2018, 504,872,558
shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.
Part III of this Annual Report on Form
10-K incorporates by reference information from the definitive Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 2018 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders or on a subsequent amendment to this Annual Report on From 10-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
not later than 120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. Exhibits incorporated by reference are
referred to under Part IV.
This Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A
of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, that involve many risks and uncertainties. Reference is made in particular to the description of our plans and objectives
for future operations, assumptions underlying such plans and objectives, expectations regarding the acceleration of our indebtedness
and other forward-looking statements included in this report. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements
that could be deemed forward-looking statements. Such statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, including
but not limited to terms such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “would,”
“could,” “confident,” “forecast,” “hope,” “likely,” “plan,”
“possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “expect,”
“believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “continue,” “future,”
“ongoing,” or similar terms, variations of such terms or the negative of such terms. Such statements are based on management’s
current expectations and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements. Such statements address future events and conditions concerning, among
others, capital expenditures, earnings and future financial performance, results of pending and potential future litigation and
government investigations, regulatory matters, liquidity and capital resources, growth targets or expectations, market and industry
trends and developments, indebtedness, and accounting matters. Some factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those anticipated include, among others, future economic conditions, including changes in economic conditions in the markets
in which we operate; changes in consumer demand; risks associated with our capital structure, including our ability to access necessary
funding or generate sufficient sales growth to generate sufficient operating cash flow to meet our debt service obligations and
operating needs; difficulties in successfully executing our growth initiatives; the effects of competition in the markets in which
we operate; risks associated with new technologies and our ability to bring such new technologies to market, control of costs and
expenses; risks associated with our indebtedness, including our ability to manage liquidity needs and to comply with the terms
of our indebtedness; risks associated with the limited trading volume of our common stock; our ability to attract and retain key
executives and employees, legislative, regulatory and competitive developments in markets in which we operate; results of pending
litigation and present and possible future claims, litigation or enforcement actions or government investigations; and other circumstances
and risks affecting anticipated revenues and costs, and the risk factors set forth under “Risk Factors” in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K and other risks referenced from time-to-time in our filings with the SEC.
The forward-looking
statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements
are made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions, or otherwise, after
the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should read this report and
the documents that we reference in this report, including documents referenced by incorporation, completely and with the understanding
that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect or hope.
PART I
Overview and Recent Events
Abtech Holdings, Inc. (“Abtech Holdings,”
the “Company,” “we” or the “registrant”) was incorporated in Nevada on February 13, 2007 under
the name “Laural Resources, Inc.” and was initially engaged in the business of acquiring and developing mineral properties.
Subsequent to its fiscal year ended May 31, 2010, Laural Resources, Inc. decided to change its business focus to clean technology
products and services, specifically in the water clean-up sector. In furtherance of its business objectives, effective June 14,
2010, Laural Resources, Inc. merged with its wholly-owned subsidiary, Abtech Holdings, Inc., for the purpose of effecting a name
change to “Abtech Holdings, Inc.” On October 21, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors changed the Company’s
fiscal year end from May 31 to December 31.
On February 10, 2011, the Company closed
a merger transaction with AbTech Industries, Inc. (“AbTech Industries” or “AbTech”), a Delaware corporation,
pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Abtech Holdings, Abtech Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Abtech Holdings and AbTech Industries (the “Merger”).
As a result of the Merger, (i) Abtech Holdings
acquired all of the issued and outstanding common stock of AbTech Industries (through a reverse acquisition transaction) in exchange
for the common stockholders of AbTech Industries acquiring an approximate 78% ownership interest in Abtech Holdings, (ii) AbTech
Industries became a majority-owned subsidiary of Abtech Holdings, and (iii) Abtech Holdings acquired the business and operations
of AbTech Industries.
AEWS Engineering LLC (“AEWS”),
a Delaware Limited Liability Company, was formed on October 31, 2011, as a subsidiary of Abtech Holdings. AEWS operated as an independent
civil and environmental engineering firm that provided engineering and technology innovation to the water infrastructure sector.
In 2015, the operations of AEWS were transferred to AbTech Industries and AEWS is now dormant.
The Company, through its operating subsidiary,
AbTech Industries, provides solutions to water contamination issues that are caused by stormwater runoff, industrial processes,
water produced in the extractive industries such as oil & gas drilling, and spills of oil-based fluids in marine environments.
The Company’s total solutions and systems approach to addressing our customers’ needs results in the Company providing
services for the design and selection of water treatment systems, sales of filtration and treatment systems, installation of the
treatment technologies, and maintenance of the installed systems. Some of these activities are provided through subcontractors
and on some projects the Company may act as a subcontractor to other entities.
AbTech Industries has developed a variety
of products that leverage its cornerstone filtration media technology called Smart Sponge
®
. This patented technology’s
oil absorbing capabilities make it highly effective as a filtration media to remove hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water.
AbTech Industries is currently manufacturing its products and is marketing them into a variety of markets with thousands of products
installed in 46 states within the United States and 15 other countries to date.
The Company’s business is subject
to several significant risks, any of which could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results, financial condition,
and the actual outcome of matters as to which it makes forward-looking statements. See “Risk Factors” at page 19 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K and refer to “Forward-Looking Statements” on page ii of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Technologies
AbTech Industries maintains a core set
of water treatment technologies with applications in all of its market sectors. While the Company has expanded to include a variety
of services that are related to its “solutions” approach, it has maintained a strong focus on its heritage as an advanced
technology company. Moreover, the Company is able to leverage its core technologies as discriminators to gain entry into markets
where otherwise there would be prohibitive barriers to entry.
Smart Sponge
®
AbTech Industries has developed and patented
its core Smart Sponge technologies based on a proprietary blend of synthetic polymers aimed at the removal of hydrocarbons and
oil derivatives from surface water. Smart Sponge products remove pollutants from water and encapsulate them so that they cannot
be released, even under high pressure. The removal process starts with the physical contact between polymer and contaminant and
the consequent adsorption (physical interaction, contaminant distributed on surface of adsorbing material) or absorption (contaminant
distributed throughout the absorbing material). The absorption/adsorption process is determined by several polymer parameters (e.g.,
composition and structure, flexibility of the chain and molecular weight), as well as physical parameters (e.g., polymer physical
form, contaminant molecule size and temperature). While polymer composition is the critical factor in defining the solubility,
the polymer structure (amorphous or crystalline) is probably the most important factor in determining the process of absorption
or adsorption.
AbTech Industries’ polymers are composed
of amorphous products that are able to selectively absorb various hydrocarbons (contaminants) present in water, then stabilize
and retain them in a gelified structure. Other traditional sorbent products, with more crystalline structures, can only adsorb
the contaminants and don’t have the capability to totally retain them when the sorbent is removed from the water. AbTech
Industries’ polymers, in order to selectively remove oil derivatives from water, are oleophilic (strong affinity for oils)
and hydrophobic (repel water).
The adsorption/absorption process is also
controlled by the physical size of the sorbent as diffusion is fairly proportional to the contact surface between fluid and sorbent.
Finely powderized materials show the best absorption but, because of swelling, tend to gel quickly and block the contact of additional
fluid with the remaining active sorbent, and are very difficult to handle. In order to overcome this problem and use the sorbent
to the maximum capacity, AbTech Industries has developed a patented extrusion process that takes advantage of the different thermal
behavior of the polymers used to create entanglements with the amorphous part of the other polymer, bonding the chains of the polymers
in a flexible porous structure called Smart Sponge.
The porosity of the Smart Sponge allows
the fluid containing the contaminant to penetrate into its structure, then the polymer chains selectively absorb the hydrocarbon
contaminants and stably encapsulate them. Based on the level of contaminant, the entire structure begins to swell (but not collapse
into a total gel) while maintaining absorption capabilities well beyond usual levels. Once reaching saturation, the Smart Sponge
is easily recoverable and does not leach any of the absorbed contaminant, even in turbulent water or under pressure, giving it
less expensive disposal options such as recycling through a waste-to-energy facility. The Smart Sponge can absorb up to 3 times
its weight depending on the contaminant absorbed and remains buoyant permitting it to remain in place until fully saturated. The
malleable nature of the Smart Sponge material allows it to be formed into a variety of shapes for optimum effectiveness in a wide
variety of contaminated water filtration applications.
The advantages of Smart Sponge based products over competing
products include:
|
·
|
absorbing rather than adsorbing water-borne hydrocarbons;
|
|
·
|
reducing coliform bacteria found in stormwater, industrial wastewater and municipal wastewater (in the case of Smart Sponge
Plus, described below);
|
|
·
|
locking-up or encapsulating the hydrocarbons;
|
|
·
|
transforming the encapsulated pollutant into a solid to prevent leaching;
|
|
·
|
remaining buoyant after the encapsulation in order to permit recovery;
|
|
·
|
oil-soaked product may be recycled as a waste-to-energy fuel source;
|
|
·
|
simpler and less expensive disposal due to classification as a solid “non-hazardous waste”;
|
|
·
|
easy deployment and retrieval; and
|
|
·
|
possesses the ability to harvest energy from contaminated water thereby creating a sustainable media solution.
|
Due to the ability of Smart Sponge to capture
and retain hydrocarbons and other contaminants within its highly porous structure, its performance can best be measured by an in-depth
look at the spent material to analyze its composition and the quantity of the various contaminants retained. This type of data
cannot be gleaned from the customary random sampling events typically used to test filters. Such tests are often misleading or
erroneous due to the non-homogenous concentrations of pollutants in stormwater and wastewater. Analyzing all contaminants entrapped
in the filter over a period of time provides a better indicator of the filter’s true performance. Consequently, AbTech Industries
took a more advanced approach and engaged a highly qualified, analytical laboratory to use complex analytical techniques to deconstruct
used Smart Sponge polymer and selectively extract all the entrapped contaminants. This in-depth mapping and finger printing of
contaminants (a first of its kind in stormwater treatment) is analogous to having a “Black Box” recording of the Ultra-Urban
®
Filter’s (“UUF’s”) filtration mechanisms and all the contaminants collected in the Smart Sponge material
during the time that it is deployed. The results of this analysis were then compared to base tests performed on virgin Smart Sponge
material. The difference between the two samples constitutes the contaminants collected by the field deployed Smart Sponge. By
extrapolating these results, estimations were made of the total contaminants AbTech Industries’ products prevented from being
discharged into open waters for entire installation projects such as those at Norwalk, Connecticut. In Norwalk, 275 UUFs using
Smart Sponge filtration media were installed in storm drains to protect residential, commercial, waterside, and industrial manufacturing
settings which flow into Norwalk Harbor. The deconstruction or meltdown of Smart Sponge media samples documented approximately
50 pounds per filter of total contaminants with the presence of several heavy metals (e.g., copper, titanium, and zinc) and a variety
of hydrocarbons (about 32 pounds per filter), including solvents, oils and cosmetic product components as well as chemical plasticizers.
The grand total of contaminants including
hydrocarbons and heavy metals removed, extrapolated for the 275 filters, is an estimated 13,530 pounds. Essentially, the installation
of the filters prevented the equivalent of an oil spill of 1,200 gallons from entering the Long Island Sound. This analysis demonstrated
the effectiveness of AbTech Industries’ products with quantifiable data and added substantially to data provided by other
tests that merely tested the difference between influents and effluents.
Smart Sponge Plus
The Company has expanded the original capability
of Smart Sponge technology by adding an antimicrobial agent that has proven to be effective in reducing coliform bacteria found
in stormwater, industrial wastewater and municipal wastewater while maintaining its oil-absorbing capability. This expanded technology,
known as Smart Sponge Plus, provides an effective solution to municipalities and other entities faced with beach closures and other
hazards of bacteria-laden stormwater. The presence of bacteria in stormwater is a serious problem and poses significant health
risks that increasingly result in the contamination of water bodies. Water quality standards for bacteria counts are very strictly
monitored in most coastal areas and small increases in bacteria counts can trigger beach closures. The best potential to reduce
this bacteria count during rain events is the control and treatment of the stormwater runoff. This control can be achieved by expensive,
complex equipment, such as ultraviolet light or chlorine treatment systems, which become cost prohibitive for most municipalities.
AbTech Industries has developed a set of cost-effective systems for retrofit into existing stormwater infrastructure, leveraging
the antimicrobial capabilities of Smart Sponge Plus. These systems require no electricity or moving parts and create no downstream
toxicity effect (a problem that must be mitigated in alternative chemical treatment approaches).
This antimicrobial capability differentiates
Smart Sponge Plus products from competitive stormwater treatment devices. It can be engineered to treat massive amounts of water
runoff in end-of-pipe applications, such as drainage vaults or other configurations. Because of its antimicrobial properties, Smart
Sponge Plus is characterized as a pesticide and is required to be registered with the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”).
In July 2010, AbTech Industries received conditional approval of its application to register Smart Sponge Plus as a pesticide under
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”). (See “Regulatory” below in this item.)
Under the EPA registration, AbTech Industries is allowed to make the claim that Smart Sponge Plus is capable of reducing coliform
bacteria found in stormwater, industrial wastewater and municipal wastewater.
The technological breakthrough in creating
Smart Sponge Plus occurred when AbTech Industries, working with outside vendors, developed the process to bind an antimicrobial
agent to its proprietary polymers, thereby modifying their surface and adding micro biostatic features while maintaining their
oil absorbing capabilities. This enhanced filtration material provides a significant reduction in coliform bacteria and other pathogens
frequently found in stormwater and other water streams. AbTech Industries believes that this breakthrough, coupled with additional
advancements that have dramatically increased the antimicrobial strength of Smart Sponge Plus, will be key factors in penetrating
the stormwater market. Accordingly, AbTech Industries has been issued three U.S. patents that protect the use of Smart Sponge Plus
in stormwater filtration applications.
The anti-microbial agent used for this
innovative technology is an organosilane derivative that is widely used in a variety of fields including medical, consumables,
pool equipment and consumer goods. This anti-microbial agent is registered with the EPA for various applications and has been proven
successful in those applications against a wide variety of microorganisms. As further discussed under “Regulatory”
below in this item, AbTech Industries’ Smart Sponge Plus has received conditional registration approval from the EPA under
FIFRA as an antimicrobial pesticide. Smart Sponge Plus will also act as a fungistatic to control fungus and mildew odor.
The anti-microbial mechanism of Smart Sponge
Plus is based on the agent’s electromagnetic interaction with the microorganism cell membrane, causing the disruption of
the cell wall of the microorganism, but no chemical or physical change in the agent. Consequently, the anti-microbial agent is
not depleted over time, maintains its long-term effectiveness and unlike any other technology (with the exception of ultra-violet
light), doesn’t release any chemical or by-product into the treated water.
In manufacturing the Smart Sponge Plus
material, the anti-microbial agent is chemically and permanently bound to the polymer surface. In the development process, AbTech
Industries has been successful in increasing the amount of anti-microbial agent bound to the polymer thus increasing its antimicrobial
potency. In laboratory testing, the current generation of Smart Sponge Plus material has proven to be not only much more effective
in destroying bacteria than the original generation of Smart Sponge Plus material, but also capable of reducing bacteria in a much
shorter period of time (residence time), a very important factor in filtration applications where the contaminated water is in
contact with the Smart Sponge material for just a few minutes versus the hours required in a sanitary sewer system.
Ironwood and Smart Sponge HM
In 2014, AbTech Industries exclusively
licensed a heavy metals removal technology from Synanomet, LLC (“Synanomet”). The technology was developed at the University
of Arkansas Little Rock and Synanomet is a company formed primarily for the purposes of commercializing the technology. The technology
is a novel carbon-based renewable material with attached nanostructures that are highly effective at removing phosphates, as well
as heavy metals such as selenium, chromium, copper, iron, lead and zinc.
AbTech is targeting both point and non-point source applications
of the technology. Discharge permit requirements for heavy metals are very stringent, typically requiring removal down to the parts
per billion level. Many of the heavy metals, like selenium and lead, have well known risks to human health and the environment.
These are all heavily regulated contaminants. Phosphorous, a nutrient, which is found in fertilizers, soaps and many day-to-day
consumer products increasingly in higher concentrations, make their way into our rivers, lakes and oceans. Phosphorous, when combined
with nitrogen, is an optimal food source for algae creating seasonal algae blooms that ultimately lead to “dead zones”.
These dead zones are areas where the algae have consumed much of the available oxygen in the water, making the water uninhabitable
for other marine species. The USEPA has identified high-priority areas of concern such as the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and the
Great Lakes Watershed.
The heavy metals media in its raw form
is referred to as “Ironwood” and uses a wood substrate and attaches a hematite magnetite nanoparticle, in high density,
to the surface of the substrate. This iron-based particle is then able to chelate and adsorb the metal to the surface of the media.
The process of chelation and adsorption is very fast, typically a matter of minutes. Metals other than iron may also be adhered
to the substrate surface in order to more effectively attract cationic or anionic species of heavy metals. The media can be quickly
regenerated through a simple pH adjustment process and then reused. Regeneration in the lab has been done over 100 times with no
concomitant reduction in total adsorption capacity. The technology is protected by 13 issued patents.
AbTech Industries has also combined the
Ironwood media with Smart Sponge, which is referred to as SmartSponge HM, in order to achieve enhanced hydraulic conductivity over
the wood-based media alone. AbTech deploys the media both in its virgin Ironwood form and as Smart Sponge HM.
Smart Sponge versus Commonly Used Non-Advanced Media Filtration
AbTech Industries’ core technologies
are highly-engineered advanced materials that are chemically selective towards contaminants and, in the case of the antimicrobial
material, create biostatic fields to disrupt the cellular membranes of pathogens. These advanced materials enable an entire set
of engineered deployment systems that otherwise would be less effective or entirely ineffective using non-advanced materials.
Smart Sponge material has a distinct advantage
over traditional polypropylene material. In the case of oils and hydrocarbons, once oil comes in contact with the Smart Sponge
material it is permanently encapsulated in the structure of the polymer and cannot be released under any amount of pressure. In
comparison, polypropylene materials adsorb, or form a temporary attachment to, water as well as oil, thus making them much heavier
and messier to remove and causing them to release both water and oil back into the environment.
Disposal Options
As local conditions, product use and exposure
can vary widely, the end user must determine the most appropriate disposal method for spent Smart Sponge materials. Smart Sponge
samples saturated with hydrocarbons both in the lab and in the field have been tested according to the EPA’s Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure (“TCLP”) by the following independent testing facilities: ABC Laboratories, Inc., Aculabs, Inc.
and Turner Laboratories, Inc. These tests show that Smart Sponge is a “non-leaching” product. In addition, used Smart
Sponge material can be recycled as an energy source with a British thermal unit, or BTU, value ranging from 10,000 to 18,000 BTU/lb.
based on the type of contaminant absorbed. As a result, Smart Sponge technology affords many cost effective and environmentally
friendly disposal options. The following waste disposal and resource recovery industries have accepted spent Smart Sponge materials
for disposal and/or recycling:
On-site Recycling.
AbTech Industries
has developed a method for recycling spent Smart Sponge and its solidified hydrocarbons, allowing for 100% recycling of the spent-media.
This patented process converts solid Smart Sponge media and absorbed hydrocarbons into a liquid that can be sold to a refinery,
eliminating disposal costs and generating additional revenue.
Waste-to-Energy Facilities (“WTE”).
A specialized segment of the solid waste industry has used spent Smart Sponge material as an alternative fuel in the production
of electricity. WTE is acknowledged at the federal level as a renewable energy source under the Federal Power Act, Title IV of
the Clean Air Act and is a participant in the Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Program.
Cement Kilns.
This industry has
used the spent Smart Sponge material as an alternative fuel in the production process of Portland Cement. This process is considered
a beneficial reuse of waste products. The BTU value of spent Smart Sponge material is consistently above the average acceptable
levels set for this high temperature process.
Landfills.
Used Smart Sponge products
have been classified as a solid waste and are commonly accepted at Subtitle D Landfills.
Engineered Systems and Smart Sponge-based Products Being
Sold
In conjunction with developing advanced
filtration media, AbTech Industries engineers have also developed a variety of deployment systems that can be retrofitted into
existing stormwater and wastewater infrastructure. This solves a major problem for municipalities where aging water infrastructure
and increasing enforcement of water quality standards (a result of increased awareness of the detrimental environmental and public
health effects) pose one of the largest infrastructure challenges in the coming decades. Municipalities have already determined
in the vast majority of cases that so-called centralized solutions are cost-prohibitive or infeasible. These solutions include
rerouting combined sewer overflow water and/or even stormwater to wastewater treatment plants for purification (which would also
require the construction of new or additional sanitation treatment plant capacity) or building large central stormwater/wastewater
treatment “tunnels” underneath municipalities. AbTech Industries’ products enable decentralized solutions at
the point-of-entry (e.g. stormdrains, etc.) or at the end of stormwater/combined sewer overflow outfall pipes.
AbTech Industries has engineered a variety
of point-of-entry systems that can be dropped into storm drains with little or zero infrastructure disruption and end-of-pipe treatment
systems that can be built into the existing water lines to treat the flowing water as it passes through.
The products described below incorporate
any of the Smart Sponge medias in one or more of their various forms and are each designed to meet specific market challenges.
Each of these products is currently being marketed and sold by the Company. We manufacture the Smart Sponge material in our manufacturing
facility using polymers procured from the petrochemical industry. We then use this material to complete the final assembly of each
product using component parts produced in-house or to our specification by outside vendors. Each product has application in each
of the Company’s targeted markets discussed further under “Markets” below in this item, although the UUFs and
end-of-pipe systems are designed primarily for stormwater applications and the gravity and vessel filters have primary application
in industrial and produced water markets.
Smart Sponge Popcorn
The Smart Sponge material can be formed
into a variety of physical shapes to optimize its performance in a wide range of filtration applications. The Smart Sponge material
is the cornerstone of AbTech Industries’ current products, and AbTech Industries continues to find new applications for its
use. When produced in its “popcorn” form (clumps of polymer similar in shape to popcorn), Smart Sponge is an effective
filtration media due to its high porosity and favorable hydraulic characteristics. The Smart Sponge material can also be sold to
OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) and other users to be integrated into many different filtration pressure vessels or gravity
flow structures.
Ultra-Urban® Filter
The UUF with Smart Sponge is an innovative
low-cost Best Management Practice (“BMP”) that helps meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”)
requirements with effective filtration, efficient application, and low maintenance. The UUF is a modular filtration unit (or Catch
Basin Insert) designed in a variety of shapes and sizes for use in “curb opening” and “top down” storm
drains and is used to treat stormwater runoff for new or retrofitted sites by absorbing oil and grease; adsorbing heavy metals
and phosphates; and capturing trash and sediment.
The UUF is ideal for municipal, industrial
and construction applications ensuring compliance with stormwater regulations. The filter comes in three designs: the Curb Opening,
Drain Insert, and Customized Drain Insert. The unique micro porosity of Smart Sponge allows the standard sized CO1414 UUF filter
a hydraulic flow rate of more than 200 gallons per minute and has proven effective in removing more than 80% of hydrocarbons and
total suspended solids (“TSS”) (300 microns or greater).
The unique design of the Curb Opening Series
allows crews to easily hang the appropriate number of filters in each drain on a simple mounting bracket. The product is designed
with a lateral bypass to utilize each box as well as an overflow capability to eliminate the potential for street flooding in the
event of a plugged filter.
The UUF Drain Insert Series offers the
same filtration characteristics of the Curb Opening series for stormwater filtration of hydrocarbons, trash and sediment. The unique
micro porosity of Smart Sponge allows the Drain Insert Series DI2020 UUF to have a hydraulic flow rate of more than 500 gallons
per minute, and has proven effective in removing more than 80% of hydrocarbons and TSS (300 microns or greater). These units are
designed to be suspended beneath a collar installed under the stormwater grates. This simple design allows easy access for maintenance
while eliminating the potential for street flooding in the event of a plugged filter.
Customized drain inserts are available
for those customers with shallow drains or requiring deeper bed depths. AbTech Industries’ engineers work with customers
to understand the site characteristics, including hydraulics and contamination levels in order to confirm the appropriate Smart
Sponge bed depth to achieve the project’s filtration goals.
End-of-Pipe Water Treatment Systems
(using advanced filtration media like Smart Sponge)
AbTech Industries’ end-of-pipe water
treatment systems, which include vaults, horizontal pipe systems and horizontal tank systems, use advanced filtration media such
as Smart Paks
®
as an effective alternative to treating individual catch basins. These systems, which are typically
pre-cast vaults, pipes and tanks, are easily retrofitted into existing stormwater systems and are ideal for stormwater treatment
at or near the end of pipe. End-of-pipe system sizes can be adapted for various flow rates and contamination levels to solve a
wide range of stormwater treatment issues.
AbTech Industries can engineer its end-of-pipe
water treatment systems for large projects either as stand-alone applications or as part of a treatment train to polish water working
in conjunction with retention ponds or hydrodynamic separators. These engineered solutions can be direct or radial flow, and can
easily be adapted to treat the first flush while allowing the later flow of a major storm event to pass around the systems to achieve
the hydraulic requirements of the watershed.
SMART PAK
®
AbTech Industries' Smart Pak is designed
for use in new or existing end-of-pipe systems such as vaults. Smart Paks may be specified with Smart Sponge, Smart Sponge Plus
or Smart Sponge HM, to target the contaminants of concern such as oil and grease, trash, debris, sediment, heavy metals, phosphorous
and coliform bacteria. Smart Paks help users meet and/or exceed stormwater NPDES permit requirements with effective filtration,
absorption, life expectancy and maintenance costs. Smart Pak products are constructed out of AbTech Industries' patented Smart
Sponge medias which are nonhazardous materials, and can be specified for a variety of applications. AbTech Industries' Smart Pak
allows Smart Sponge technology to be scaled to virtually any size required in an easy-to-maintain form.
Absorbent Boom and Line Skimmer
AbTech Industries' Tubular Absorbent Booms
and Line Skimmers employ the Smart Sponge absorptive technology which rejects water while absorbing even sheen levels of hydrocarbons
in low energy flow environments. Tubular Absorbent Booms and Line Skimmers are designed to absorb and permanently encapsulate hydrocarbons
resulting in no dewatering of oily water during removal. These products remain completely buoyant, even after being saturated,
allowing long term deployment and conveniently scheduled removal.
Passive Skimmer
The Passive Skimmer is designed to absorb
and encapsulate hydrocarbons by floating directly on the water in catch basins, sumps, oil/water separators, and marine fueling
stations. Passive Skimmers are made with Smart Sponge, are packaged in flexible mesh containers, and are available in a variety
of sizes.
Bilge Skimmer
The Smart Sponge Non-Leaching Bilge Skimmer
is engineered and designed for permanently encapsulating the petroleum hydrocarbons that appear as oily sheen in the engine compartment
during normal boat operation. The Bilge Skimmer will absorb the contaminant and allow the boater to discharge clean water from
the bilge pump.
Industrial Process Water Systems
For the past several years, AbTech Industries
has been working on solutions for the industrial process water and wastewater systems market. These systems utilize a combination
of components including pretreatment, membranes and ion exchange to purify makeup water (well or surface) streams for various different
plant requirements. Some systems may utilize AbTech’s core Smart Sponge technology in the pretreatment, depending upon the
contaminants in the source water. With the recently added focus to the industrial sector, AbTech Industries has added personnel
with extensive experience in process water systems. The Company has collaborative relationships with engineering contractors and
third party manufacturers to provide the best quality systems for its customers.
Produced Water Products
AbTech Industries has developed de-oiling
solutions for the produced water market. These solutions generally are combined with other treatment systems to address the
full range of the problematic contaminants present at a given site. AbTech’s de-oiling solutions are designed to remove hydrocarbons
as both a pre-filter to protect the other treatment systems in the treatment train, or as polishing agent at the end of the treatment
process. One solution for the removal of free oil in produced water is AbTech Industries’ contactor(s) in a pretreatment
position. These consist of contactor tanks that are sized based on flow rate, influent concentration of contaminant, the
desired media change out schedule, and space or size constraints. The contactors used are widely available vessels, including
ASME certified pressure vessels that are filled with loose Smart Sponge popcorn media. These systems can be implemented ranging
from 300 to 3,000 gallons per minute. While AbTech Industries has field tested several different configurations of these treatment
systems, it has not yet sold any of these systems commercially. Over the past several years, AbTech Industries’ focus has
been on a new evaporative technology to treat produced water. It is also experimenting with its heavy metal technology to develop
cost effective solutions for the treatment of produced water.
Markets
AbTech Industries targets three major markets:
stormwater/wastewater, industrial wastewater/process water, and produced water applications for the oil & gas industry. The
Company’s products also have application in the spill prevention and control markets (including marine environments), although
the Company is not currently focused on this market as a priority.
Stormwater and Wastewater Market
This market consists of municipalities
and private sector entities that for regulatory or other reasons are seeking to control the quality of water and other fluids that
run off roads and other paved surfaces during wet weather, cleaning or oil spill events. Current customers include municipalities,
state agencies, federal agencies, commercial and private developers, industrial facilities and businesses. Stormwater discharges
are generated during a rainfall event by runoff from land and impervious areas such as paved streets, parking lots and building
rooftops. The runoff water picks up a variety of pollutants, in particular bacteria hydrocarbons and heavy metals in quantities
that can adversely affect water quality, and carries those pollutants into nearby rivers, lakes and oceans.
|
·
|
Regulatory Drivers to the Stormwater Market
–
Stormwater discharges are subject
to regulation by the EPA, state and local regulatory bodies. Authorized by the Clean Water Act, the NPDES program requires permits
for sources that discharge pollutants into bodies of water. Obtaining and complying with NPDES permits requires implementation
of stormwater control measures, such as AbTech Industries’ engineered solutions.
|
Regulation of stormwater is
a relatively new occurrence. The first phase of the NPDES program was promulgated in 1990, but the permit requirement was limited
to only select regulated entities. The second phase of the NPDES program expanded the permit requirement significantly but did
not start until 2003.
Combined Sewer Overflows also
must comply with the Clean Water Act and present an opportunity for AbTech Industries’ engineered treatment solutions. Combined
sewer systems serve roughly 772 communities in the United States serving 40 million people. In periods of rainfall or snowmelt,
the combined stormwater and wastewater volume in a combined sewer system can exceed the capacity of the sewer system or treatment
plant. This leads to the direct discharge of untreated sewage and other pollutants to the environment.
Enforcement of stormwater/CSO
standards have increased, with EPA compelling installation of stormwater control measures and water quality treatment systems through
consent decrees. In recent years, billions of dollars of mandated spending on stormwater/CSO systems has been created through consent
decrees.
|
·
|
Health and Tourism Concerns Driving the Stormwater Market
– One area of the stormwater
market that is receiving increased publicity and attention is the water pollution caused by microorganisms (bacteria). Polluted
stormwater runoff can expose boaters and swimmers to bacteria, viruses and protozoans. A Southern California epidemiological study
revealed that individuals who swim in areas adjacent to flowing storm drain outfalls were 50% more likely to develop a variety
of symptoms than those who swim further away from the same drains. These situations are the cause for thousands of beach closings
every year, which affect public health and local economies dependent upon tourism and recreation. The Natural Resources Defense
Council (“NRDC”) has reported that their research found that the biggest cause of beach closings and advisories is
stormwater runoff. According to NRDC’s 2014
Testing the Waters
report, in 2012 there were 20,120 days of closings
and advisories across the country at ocean, bay and Great Lakes beaches. NRDC reported that more than 80% of the closings and advisories
in 2012 were issued because bacteria levels in the beachwater exceeded public health standards, potentially indicating the presence
of human or animal waste. This was the eighth time in the prior nine years that the number of beach closing and advisory days exceeded
20,000. Stormwater runoff was reported as the primary known source of known pollution nationwide, consistent with past years, indicating
a lack of needed progress on the problem at the national level. NRDC's annual analysis of water quality data at 3,485 coastal U.S.
beaches monitored in 2013 found that 10% of all monitoring samples exceeded the EPA's most protective benchmark for assessing swimmer
safety, known as the Beach Action Value, or BAV.
|
|
·
|
Going Green Initiatives
–
Knowing that polluted stormwater runoff is one of
the leading causes of water pollution in the country, many companies are including on-site stormwater treatment in their environmental
sustainability goals. AbTech Industries’ systems can help companies meet these goals. AbTech Industries’ Smart Sponge
technology not only treats polluted water, it is also recyclable, requires no electricity or other power source and can provide
users with quantifiable results of its efficacy, thus helping companies demonstrate their “going green” stewardship.
|
Industrial Wastewater and Process WaterMarket
The industrial market serves manufacturers
seeking to control and clean wastewater generated in various processes. The market is comprised of both heavy industry such as
oil refineries, steel mills, chemical plants, pulp and paper plants and more localized concerns such as mid-size manufacturers,
refuse sites and shipping/receiving areas. This market also includes private developers, gas stations and owners of developed sites
(i.e., parking lots) of over one acre.
Companies in the industrial market are
placing increased emphasis on water recovery and reuse in order to conserve and protect scarce water resources and the environment.
These efforts create the need for effective products and services to treat the water to reduce bacteria and remove unwanted contaminants
such as oil derivatives and hydrocarbons.
Industrial companies are also required
to comply with increasingly stringent discharge regulations, creating the need for products to treat runoff water or discharge
water before it leaves an industrial facility. The EPA has classified over 3,000 industrial and electric utility facilities as
water pollution dischargers. Each of these facilities provides its own wastewater treatment prior to discharge into an open body
of water. The size of many of these plants is equal to or greater than those of many municipalities, and in many instances their
processes are more complex than those provided by a municipality because of the nature of the chemical pollutants being treated.
The largest industrial user of wastewater treatment processes is the chemical and petrochemical sector. There are more than 12,000
chemical/petrochemical plants in the United States and approximately 90% treat wastewater on-site. In addition, there are approximately
30 to 40 independent industrial off-site plants, most of which handle chemical and petrochemical wastewater, principally from medium-sized
and small companies.
Within these vertical markets exist opportunities
for AbTech Industries, including phosphorus and heavy metals discharge. Phosphorus is regulated to ultra-low levels to prevent
eutrophication in receiving waters such as rivers, lakes, and other large bodies of water. Many industrial plants deploy biological
waste treatment to destroy their organic contaminants. Phosphorus is a nutrient used in this process, and at times carries
over into the discharge. Selenium is another contaminant of concern within several verticals such as mining, power and oil
& gas. Selenium is known to cause problems to aquatic life and is thus being regulated to ultra-low levels. Other
heavy metals such as mercury, copper, cadmium, arsenic, zinc, iron and chromium, have various discharge limits to which AbTech
Industries is focusing its efforts to treat with Ironwood or Smart Sponge HM media.
Produced Water and Frack Water Applications
in the Oil & Gas Industry
Oil and gas exploration and production
activities result in the production of significant volumes of contaminated water. On average, there is five times as much contaminated
water generated as oil or gas. Approximately 75% of this water is re-injected into the formation to maintain pressure or deep well
re-injected at another site. In a traditional oil production field this water is called “produced water.” In fracking
operations this can include “frac flowback water” and in gas fields this could include “gas condensate water.”
Approximately 25% of all water generated from the exploration and production activities must be treated for either reuse in operations
or for discharge to the environment under an NPDES permit. According to the EPA, the Clean Water Act prohibits the discharge of
oil or oily waste into or upon the navigable waters of the United States or the waters of the contiguous zone if such discharge
causes a film or sheen upon the surface of the water. Violators are subject to a monetary penalty. The attributes of AbTech Industries’
Smart Sponge technology and its ability to remove “oily sheen” make it especially suited to service this market. Smart
Sponge can be used as a pretreatment system to remove diesel range organics and free oils prior to additional treatment by downstream
technologies to remove or reduce contaminants such as volatile organic compounds, dissolved solids, bacteria, heavy metals and
phosphates.
Spill Prevention and Control Market
There are a number
of applications related to rivers, lakes and oceans that call for the use of floating or in-line filtration products to control
and reduce the presence of hydrocarbons in the water or on board transiting vessels. Customers include the cruise ship industry,
recreational boaters, marina owners, port authorities, spill response organizations and commercial shippers.
This market also comprises
airports, airport fueling facilities, U.S. Department of Defense bases, transfer stations, and others concerned about oil spills.
Under the Federal Clean Water Act, the EPA has issued the Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (“SPCC”) rule,
which requires owners or operators of facilities that store, use, process, transfer, distribute or consume oil and oil products,
including airports and military bases, to have minimum preventative systems in place. The risks of not adequately implementing
such countermeasures are regulatory violations, fines and potential releases that result in contamination, clean-up and additional
fines. The impact of these issues can result in significant costs to a facility owner/operator. There are more than 250 medium
and large sized airports in the United States and approximately 300 U.S. military facilities.
AbTech Industries’ systems can be
deployed for the oil and fuel contamination problems facing airports and military facilities. These systems can not only be used
to address such problems as stormwater runoff, but also provide effective SPCC solutions to limit potential liabilities to customers
by providing a last line of defense or perimeter protection for fuel spills.
Sales, Distribution, and Marketing Support
Historically, the Company has generated
revenues by selling its products directly to end customers, through distributors in key geographic markets and, in recent years,
through alliances to penetrate key market segments such as municipal stormwater, federal facilities and industrial process water.
The Company pursued contracts that would enable it to bring its stormwater expertise to all phases of rebuilding projects, including
the design, installation and operation of water treatment systems. The Company signed its first contract for such a project with
the County of Nassau in October 2013. After more than a year of work on this project which progressed slowly and was hampered by
many delays, the contract was suspended by Nassau County in May 2015, following the announcement of the federal investigation of
a state senator, Dean Skelos, and his son Adam Skelos, who had acted as a consultant to the Company. As a consequence of the negative
publicity for the Company surrounding these events, the Company began to direct a greater portion of its sales efforts towards
non-stormwater applications of its products in commercial and industrial markets, while continuing to support stormwater product
sales through direct sales staff and through distributors in domestic and international markets. In 2015 and 2016, the Company
hired a team of seasoned sales professionals with extensive experience in industrial markets. Through its research and development
efforts the Company has made strides to develop new products and refine existing products for these new markets intended to provide
effective solutions for the treatment of produced water in the mining and drilling (fracking) industries, filtration of process
water used in industrial applications and the filtration of heavy metals from water in a variety of applications. This is a time
consuming process that requires significant testing in the lab and in the field to demonstrate efficacy.
Stormwater and Wastewater Market
AbTech Industries’ approach to the stormwater/wastewater
market is now focused on product sales in the commercial, industrial and public (municipalities and cities) markets. The Company
is primarily using a direct sales approach with its own sales staff to identify and address market opportunities in the United
States. It also uses distributors and manufacturer representatives in specific geographic market areas. In markets outside the
United States, the Company uses distributors with exclusive and non-exclusive marketing rights in specific geographic areas.
Industrial Wastewater Market
The industrial wastewater
market is focused on the treatment of oily wastewater from industrial processes for either reuse or discharge. This market is serviced
by many regional chemical and equipment supply companies that offer a catalog of solutions. Solutions may require little to no
individual engineering, up to custom engineered solutions to address a customer need. AbTech Industries services this market by
selling direct to industrial customers and providing engineering and sales support services to industrial chemical suppliers, equipment
suppliers and consulting engineers. The Company also intends to engage manufacturer’s representatives and distributors to
sell the Company’s products in specific markets or for specific applications.
Oil & Gas Market
Treatment of contaminated produced water
for the oil & gas industry focuses on the water produced during oil and gas exploration and production. Oil services companies,
oil and gas producers, and engineering firms are the main customers. Applications for this market are generally engineered solutions.
AbTech Industries services this market with direct AbTech Industries’ sales representatives and engineering resources, including
external engineering design resources when necessary. The Company’s attempts to collaborate with other entities that provide
complimentary technologies to meet the specific needs of customers have not been successful to date in part due to economic factors
affecting the oil & gas market, which has resulted in the prolonged depression of oil and gas prices. The Company is currently
focusing most of its efforts in this market on the development of an evaporative technology which is not yet ready for commercialization.
Collaboration With Consulting Firms,
Academic Institutions and Public Advocacy Groups
AbTech Industries, both on its own, and
with its distributors, has been active in seeking out and cooperating with a number of academic institutions and private groups
that have interests that may advance the use of AbTech Industries’ products.
AbTech Industries’ products have
been assessed by several consultants and institutions. The tests performed by these entities, along with the extensive testing
completed by the Company, have involved various types of contaminants, contaminant concentrations, flow rates, filter residence
times and other factors. These tests, conducted over many years, have led the Company to design its products for the applications
where Smart Sponge material performs best and have provided the data needed to validate performance claims for each of the various
applications for which such products are currently being marketed. Testing is an ongoing process for the Company as we continue
to seek new ways to improve performance and expand efficacy. Consultants used in the past to assess our products include:
|
·
|
Alden Labs
.
Alden, a recognized leader
in the field of research and development, is the oldest continuously operating hydraulic laboratory in the United States and one
of the oldest in the world. Alden has completed a variety of tests on AbTech Industries’ SMART PAK for hydraulic conductivity
and sediment removal in vault configurations.
|
|
·
|
North America Science Associates (“NAMSA”)
.
For over 40 years, NAMSA has been supporting the medical device and pharmaceutical industries through a wide variety of testing
services, all designed to ensure safety, efficacy and regulatory compliance. NAMSA has completed extensive lab efficiency tests
for Smart Sponge Plus materials using varied concentrations of bacteria and exposure times.
|
|
·
|
Millsaps College
.
Millsaps is a private
liberal arts college located in Jackson, Mississippi. Through the Department of Geology, Millsaps has cooperated with AbTech Industries
to test the Smart Sponge’s absorption capability with different hydrocarbons, Smart Sponge porosity and performance claims
for the UUF and other products designed for the aviation industry. Millsaps has completed testing for many other large corporations
including 3M, Dow, Clorox and Ergon, a local supplier of polypropylene fibers and sorbents for oil spills.
|
|
·
|
HydroQual Inc
.
HydroQual (now HDR, Inc.)
is an environmental engineering and science firm. With a staff of over 100 employees, HydroQual addresses issues dealing with
water quality, TMDL analyses, floatables pollution, water and wastewater treatment. HydroQual has performed a variety of tests
to validate AbTech Industries’ claims regarding the performance of the Smart Sponge.
|
|
·
|
University of California, Los Angeles (“UCLA”)
.
The UCLA Department of Engineering and Environmental Sciences provided independent validation of early versions of AbTech Industries’
Ultra-Urban Filter.
|
Competition
Industrial Markets
There are three key areas of industrial
focus, which include oil removal, phosphorus and heavy metals reduction and process water systems.
1.
Oil Reduction
. AbTech’s
Smart Sponge media is designed to be applied in oil and grease polishing applications within the Oil & Gas and Food & Beverage
industries. The competition consists of mechanical removal unit processes like Dissolved Air Flotation and gravity sedimentation,
in addition to filtrations systems such as walnut shell filtration, media filters and ultra-filtration.
|
·
|
Walnut Shell Filters
: Walnut shell filters
are very similar to conventional media filters, except instead of using sand or anthracite media as the filtering media, crushed
walnut shells are used as the media. Walnut shells are used because they have a very high affinity for attracting and capturing
oil particles. Like conventional media filters, the walnut shells must be backwashed to remove accumulated oil. Consequently,
influent oil concentrations are normally limited to 50 to 100 mg/l to prevent excessive backwashing of the filter media. Due to
the walnut shell media’s high affinity for oil, effluent oil concentrations of 5 mg/l or less are common. While the
walnut shell filter can remove some amounts of suspended solids, it is difficult to estimate its efficiency in this area. The
walnut shell filter should not be used as a suspended solids removal device. Smart Sponge’s simple design offers a
competitive advantage over walnut shell technology. The Smart Sponge system does not require backwashing, which saves on
capital and operating expenses. Suppliers of walnut shell filters include Siemens Energy, Enviro-Tech and Filtrasystems.
|
|
·
|
Media Filters
: Media filters, which use sand and/or anthracite media, are primarily used
for suspended solids removal and not for oil removal, though some oil removal does occur. Influent oil and suspended solids concentrations
are normally limited to 50 mg/l. Based on these influent conditions, effluent oil concentrations of 10 to 20 mg/l are common, with
effluent suspended solids concentrations of 5 mg/l or less being common. If oil removal is the primary treatment goal, and effluent
oil concentrations less than 20 mg/l are required, it is more prudent to select Smart Sponge, due to its affinity for absorbing
oil. There are many suppliers of media filters including Evoqua, GE, Suez and Veolia.
|
|
·
|
Ultrafiltration
: Like media filters, ultrafilters
are primarily designed for removal of suspended solids to extremely low concentrations. While they can provide extremely good
oil removal at relatively low influent oil concentration, they should not be used primarily for oil removal due to their relatively
high costs. Normally, Smart Sponge can provide effective oil removal to required effluent requirements, at a lower cost than ultrafilters.
One variation of the ultrafiltration product line has been specifically designed to remove oil emulsions, like those which may
be present in metal finishing wastewaters. Suppliers of ultrafiltration systems include Pall, Koch and Hydranautics.
|
2.
Phosphorus and Metals Reduction
.
AbTech’s Ironwood and Smart Sponge HM medias are designed to remove phosphorus and heavy metals in polishing applications
within multiple vertical markets. The competition consists of conventional precipitation followed by gravity sedimentation
or media filtration, or ion exchange, adsorptive media, zero valent iron and ultrafiltration.
|
·
|
Ion Exchange
: Ion exchange resin is a solution
for treatment of heavy metals. Ion exchange is a reversible chemical reaction wherein an ion from a wastewater solution
is exchanged for a similarly charged ion attached to an immobile solid particle. The solid ion exchange particles predominantly
used today are synthetically produced organic resins. An organic ion exchange resin is composed of high molecular weight
polyelectrolytes that can exchange their mobile ions for ions of a similar charge from the wastewater. Each resin has a
distinct number of mobile ion sites that set the maximum quantity of exchanges per unit of resin. When all the sites are
used up, the resin exhausts. Spent resin can be regenerated either at the customer’s site, or a more typical approach
is to send the resin offsite for regeneration under a service contract. Ion exchange can have a high operational cost due
to high regeneration frequency and high transportation/regulatory expenses incurred by the service supplier. Ironwood uses
an iron based adsorptive media in a chelating mechanism to remove metals. Ironwood offers higher removal capacity and longer
runs between regenerations. Furthermore, the regeneration step is simple, using low quantities of chemical and shorter times,
allowing the regenerant solution to be recycled to a primary metals precipitation within the customer’s site.
There are numerous wastewater ion exchange systems suppliers, including Prochem, Suez, Evoqua, Wastech and Trinetics.
|
|
·
|
Adsorptive Media
: There are several adsorptive
medias in the market, including both iron and aluminum based materials. Suppliers of adsorptive media include Mar Systems,
Blue Water Technologies and Westech.
|
|
·
|
Zero Valent Iron
: Zero Valent Iron (“ZVI”),
elemental metallic iron, reduces waterborne inorganic ions, releasing soluble Fe(II) in their place, which oxidizes further into
Fe(III). These characteristics allow ZVI to convert oxidized elements, which may be toxic and soluble in water, into immobile
solid forms. ZVI systems are designed to reduce contaminants such as selenium, arsenic, lead and mercury and other pollutants.
ZVI is known to have long retention times (hours) resulting in a large footprint and high initial capital cost (“CAPEX”).
Ironwood is able to achieve comparable results with lower retention times. Suppliers of ZVI systems are Evoqua, Zero Valent
Iron Solutions and Tersus Environmental.
|
|
·
|
Ultrafiltration
: Ultrafiltration (UF)
systems are being used to treat for phosphorus reduction. Membrane based systems can reduce the total phosphorus to low
levels, but soluble ortho-phosphates will pass through the membrane. UF systems are high in initial capital cost (“CAPEX”)
and operating cost (“OPEX”). Ironwood and Smart Sponge HM reduce phosphorus to ultra-low levels.
The metal nanocomposites in the media have a high capacity for phosphorus removal. Suppliers of UF membrane systems are
“Evoqua, Pall, Koch Membrane Systems and Hydranautics.
|
3.
Process Water Systems
.
AbTech provides process water systems as a non-core technology. There are a number of competitors that supply process water
systems. Requirements of a project usually dictate which competitors will be bidding. For example, some projects call
for an open specification, which allows for the vendor to supply its pre-engineered standard equipment. This approach keeps
the CAPEX lower. Other projects have specific requirements that must meet the plant’s site specifications. AbTech
can provide both types of solutions for its customers. Suppliers of process water systems include GE, Evoqua, Veolia, Aquatech,
Suez and H2O Innovation.
Competitive Position – Industrial
AbTech’s competitive strategy is to lead first with its
innovative core-technologies, and then sell process water systems to the same customer base. The medias are promoted specifically
as polishers with superior results. Testing through treatability and/or piloting, provides customers with the confidence
to meet their project goals. The market reach is promoted through experienced regional salespersons, manufacturer’s representatives
and distributors. AbTech’s competitive goal is to be a customer centric organization.
Stormwater Products
Four key factors differentiate AbTech Industries’
stormwater products from other filters in the stormwater market:
|
·
|
Anti-microbial capability
.
AbTech Industries’
Smart Sponge filtration media, when treated with an anti-microbial agent, can reduce bacteria and other microbes flowing through
the filter. Smart Sponge products are available with or without the added anti-microbial agent.
|
|
·
|
Structural Filter
.
AbTech Industries’
UUF and end-of-pipe systems are designed so that the entire structure is involved in the filtration process. Most other products
have inserted pads or pillows that allow some hydrocarbon removal, but the UUF directs the entire water flow through the filtration
media thus enhancing the effectiveness of the filter.
|
|
·
|
Superior Filtration Media
.
An essential
and superior feature of Smart Sponge filtration medium is its ability to absorb hydrocarbons and prohibit them from being released
back into the water flow when there are subsequent rain events. The reason for this is that AbTech Industries’ proprietary
blend of polymers is both hydrophobic (repels water) and oleophilic, which means that hydrocarbons are bonded within its chemical
matrix and cannot be washed off, squeezed out or leached out of the material during subsequent wetting or rain events. There are
various materials used by competitors for stormwater filtration that do not have this absorbent characteristic, instead they feature
an adsorbent capability that merely attracts hydrocarbons to their surface area, but cannot prevent them from leaching back into
the environment during subsequent rain events. The most commonly used adsorbent in the market is polypropylene, which is currently
used in many sorbent products used for oil spill clean-up. Although it is generally accepted that adsorbents are clearly inferior
to absorbents in their ability to capture and remove hydrocarbons from stormwater flows, they are widely used because of the low
comparative cost. AbTech Industries has performed numerous laboratory and field tests that verify its products’ absorption
capabilities and other performance features dealing with the removal of trash, sediment, debris, and other contaminants. Central
to these test data is the incontrovertible conclusion that AbTech Industries’ Smart Sponge filtration medium is an absorbent.
|
|
·
|
Porous Structure
.
AbTech Industries’
Smart Sponge technology maximizes the effectiveness of the oil-absorbing polymers by forming them into an extremely porous structure
that allows effective, long-lasting absorption without clogging or channeling, which is common among filter media in a powder
or particulate form.
|
There are three general categories of solutions
to deal with the treatment of stormwater: hydrodynamic separators (“HDS”), catch basin inserts and water retention
or infiltration systems, also known as green infrastructure. To give a complete competitor profile, a brief explanation of HDS
systems is given below as HDS systems are more often considered an alternative to catch basin inserts in new construction projects.
|
·
|
Hydrodynamic Separators
.
HDS products
use gravitational flow to spin the water in such a way that density differences cause sediment and other pollutants to be separated
and skimmed-off the water. HDS units are large compared to catch basin inserts (smallest systems are about the size of an automobile)
and are comprised of several large chambers or vaults, each designed to trap specific pollutants. These systems are much more
expensive than catch basin inserts, but also have the ability to handle more water flow. Unit costs for HDS systems range from
$10,000 to $100,000 depending on size. These systems tend to be more cost effective in large new developments where the HDS can
be designed into the stormwater system and large areas of run-off can be directed to each unit. In dealing with existing storm
drains, HDS products are less desirable because they require streets and sidewalks to be torn-up, drainage redirected, and construction
equipment to retrofit the drain and install the units. Catch basin inserts, on the other hand, are relatively easy to install
because they fit into existing storm drain catch basins and require little or no construction.
|
Not only are HDS systems expensive,
they also require significant maintenance to remove the trapped pollutants and ensure that the system continues to function properly.
Another limiting factor of HDS systems is that the filtered contaminants, when removed from the HDS, are often considered hazardous
waste and must be disposed of accordingly. In addition, HDS systems, while capable of handling large quantities of water, are frequently
unable to remove sufficient contaminants from the effluent to meet acceptable discharge limits. Some HDS vendors have purchased
AbTech Industries’ Smart Sponge products to be used in conjunction with the HDS units to absorb the oil that is separated
from the water, thus enhancing the performance of the systems and reducing the required maintenance. Another drawback of HDS systems
is that they are designed to retain standing water after a rain or water flow event. Consequently, the HDS vaults become breeding
grounds for mosquitoes (carrier of West Nile Virus), mold, mildew, bacteria and other undesirables.
The primary vendors of HDS systems
are: ConTech (CDS Technologies, Vortechs), Stormceptor and Baysaver Technologies.
|
·
|
Catch Basin Inserts
.
Competing products in this category include the following:
|
|
o
|
“DrainPac” by United Storm Water, Inc.
|
|
o
|
“StormBasin” by Fabco Industries
|
|
o
|
“Fossil Filter” and “Flow Guard” by Kristar
|
|
o
|
“Grate Inlet Skimmer Box” by Suntree Technologies
|
|
o
|
“Aqua-Guardian” by AquaShield
|
|
o
|
“Inceptor” by Stormdrain Solutions
|
|
o
|
“Hydro-Cartridge” by Advanced Aquatic Products
|
|
o
|
“Ultra-HydroKleen” by Ultra Tech International
|
|
·
|
Water retention or infiltration systems
. Another
solution for the treatment of stormwater is the use of water retention systems and other “Green Infrastructure” solutions
that are designed for infiltration of stormwater or redirection of such stormwater to areas where the water can be stored and
allowed to naturally percolate into the ground without the use of any filtration technology or treatment system. These systems
generally require a relatively large amount of land to be used effectively and therefore are often cost prohibitive or impractical
where available land is scarce.
|
Competitive Position – Stormwater
AbTech Industries has a strong competitive
position in the stormwater marketplace within the United States due to its product offerings. There is significant competition
for stormdrain insert filters in the marketplace, though AbTech has a competitive advantage due to the strength of its hydrocarbon
absorption technology. This competitive advantage extends to customers such as industrial facilities, marinas/ports, airports,
fueling stations, and any area where vehicle maintenance occurs. AbTech has a highly unique antimicrobial technology that requires
EPA registration. Since the development of antimicrobial technology is complex, AbTech's approach is patented, and the EPA registration
process is extensive and costly, there are high barriers to entry for competitors. This antimicrobial technology has enabled new
engineering approaches towards water quality treatment. AbTech faces competitive forces from traditional approaches towards antimicrobial
treatment. It is unclear whether AbTech's unique engineering and technology approach will gain significant market penetration.
Intellectual Property, Research, and Development
Intellectual Property
Patents
AbTech Industries endeavors to protect the intellectual property
it develops through its research and development efforts. The United States Patent Office has issued AbTech Industries and its
subsidiary 18 patents related to the Smart Sponge technology and products including a patent issued on March 6, 2018, involving
the process to recycle spent Smart Sponge and its solidified hydrocarbons. Additionally, three of the patent applications have
been pursued internationally with patents issued in Australia, Canada, China, France, Great Britain, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico
and Singapore. AbTech Industries is pursuing patent protection for other technologies that it believes are patentable and intends
to pursue patent protection for new patentable technologies that it may develop. AbTech Industries’ success depends, in part,
on its ability to maintain trade secrecy protection and operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of third parties.
The table below lists the unexpired patents issued to the Company as of December 31, 2017 and their duration. Several of these
patents have or will expire in 2018.
Patent Number
|
|
Issue Date
|
|
Expiration Date
|
US Pat. #6,344,519B1
|
|
2/5/2002
|
|
1/9/2018
|
US Pat. #6,099,723
|
|
8/8/2002
|
|
6/5/2018
|
US Pat. #6,080,307
|
|
6/27/2000
|
|
9/29/2018
|
US Pat. #6,106,707
|
|
8/22/2000
|
|
2/17/2019
|
US Pat. #6,541,569
|
|
4/1/2003
|
|
4/7/2018
|
US Pat. #6,143,172
|
|
11/7/2000
|
|
1/25/2019
|
US Pat. #6,231,758
|
|
5/15/2001
|
|
8/22/2020
|
US Pat. #6,531,059
|
|
3/11/2003
|
|
11/3/2020
|
US Pat. #6,712,976B2
|
|
3/30/2004
|
|
9/13/2021
|
US Pat. #6,723,791B2
|
|
4/20/2004
|
|
12/31/2021
|
US Pat. #7,094,338B2
|
|
8/22/2006
|
|
2/21/2023
|
US Pat #7,048,878B2
|
|
5/23/2006
|
|
3/24/2023
|
US Pat. #7,125,823B2
|
|
10/4/2006
|
|
1/29/2024
|
US Pat. #7,229,560B2
|
|
6/12/2007
|
|
12/6/2024
|
US Pat. #7,229,559B2
|
|
6/12/2007
|
|
2/27/2024
|
US Pat. #9,909,069 B2
|
|
3/6/2018
|
|
11/13/2034
|
US Pat. #7,066,023B2 (issued to subsidiary – Environmental Security Corporation)
|
|
6/27/2006
|
|
7/14/2024
|
Singapore Pat. #66582
|
|
6/20/2000
|
|
1/9/2018
|
Singapore Pat. #103019
|
|
7/31/2006
|
|
9/13/2022
|
Australia Pat. #732308
|
|
7/26/2001
|
|
1/9/2018
|
Australia Pat. #751991
|
|
12/19/2002
|
|
2/17/2019
|
Canada Pat. #2,277,163
|
|
5/10/2005
|
|
1/9/2018
|
Canada Pat. #2321108
|
|
5/26/2009
|
|
2/17/2019
|
Canada Pat. #2460511
|
|
11/27/2012
|
|
9/13/2022
|
China Pat. #ZL98801774.1
|
|
4/19/2006
|
|
1/9/2018
|
Mexico Pat. #232768
|
|
12/05/2005
|
|
1/9/2018
|
Japan Pat. #4470133
|
|
3/12/2010
|
|
2/17/2019
|
Italy Pat. #1073610B1
|
|
1/4/2009
|
|
2/17/2019
|
EEU Pat. #0973593 (France, Great Britain, Italy)
|
|
12/01/2004
|
|
1/9/2018
|
EEU Pat, #1436470
|
|
7/3/2013
|
|
9/13/2022
|
Trademarks
AbTech Industries has registered three
trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: (i) Smart Sponge
®
, which denotes the Smart Sponge material
itself in its various shapes and sizes; (ii) Ultra-Urban
®
Filter, which denotes AbTech Industries’ line of
storm drain filtration devices; and (iii) SMART PAK
®
, which describes Smart Sponge material compacted into blocks,
bricks or other pre-shaped forms. AbTech Industries also trademarked, but does not currently use, the name OARS
®
,
which denotes an oil aquatic recovery system encompassing Smart Sponge products.
Trade Secrets
In order to protect its trade secrets and
un-patented proprietary information arising from its development activities, AbTech Industries requires its employees, consultants
and contractors to enter into agreements providing for confidentiality, non-disclosure and Company ownership of any trade secret
or other un-patented proprietary information developed by employees, consultants or contractors during their employment or engagement
by AbTech Industries. AbTech Industries also requires all potential collaborative partners and distributors to enter into confidentiality
or non-disclosure agreements.
Research and Development
The current Smart Sponge technology has
prompted the development of a robust line of products. However, to ensure future growth, new products and technologies must be
developed. The Company attempts to focus its research and development efforts on projects with reasonable commercial potential,
both in terms of revenue and in terms of profit margins, where the resulting products would be inherently differentiated from competing
products, if any, or allow AbTech Industries to fill a critical gap in its products offering. In addition, the development time
to achieve the new technology or product must be reasonable. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company
spent $937,991 and $1,145,950, respectively, on research and development activities, none of which was borne directly by customers.
One of AbTech Industries’ most active
development programs is focused on the treatment and removal of heavy metals, naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORMs)
and phosphates from contaminated water. In 2014, AbTech Industries signed an exclusive license agreement for a highly effective
heavy metals removal media that can be used to target heavy metal contamination in the stormwater and mining industries, including
removal of selenium VI, a highly toxic heavy metal. This technology can be used in its raw form (referred to as “Ironwood”)
or combined with Smart Sponge media to form a Smart Sponge HM product. In 2016, AbTech Industries produced its first batches of
the raw Ironwood media at its manufacturing facility in Phoenix, Arizona. In 2017, AbTech Industries installed a more permanent
system for manufacturing the Ironwood media in the same facility and continued testing the media in a variety of commercial applications.
The Company expects to continue testing the heavy metal technology in various configurations and commercial applications during
2018 and has begun selling Smart Sponge HM products for some applications.
AbTech Industries is also involved in the
development of an evaporative technology designed to treat produced water, including frac flowback water, on-site by evaporating
the water and reducing the volume of water by more than 80%. This solution reduces the volume of water that needs to be trucked
to reinjection wells and returns the vast majority of the water, in the form of clean water vapor, back to the environment. The
technology uses thin film direct convection in a closed reaction chamber. This thermal process can use as its energy source the
flare gas or well head gas available at the oil and gas production site. The technology is designed to be straightforward and robust
in order to be reliable under very difficult operating conditions. Unlike AbTech’s other products, this product does not
use Smart Sponge in any form. During 2016 and 2017, this technology was improved and refined as it underwent various tests in the
lab and in the field. The Company believes that this technology holds great promise and is continuing its development efforts in
2018. However, even at this advanced stage of development, there can be no assurance that a commercially viable product will be
available for sale in the near term.
AbTech Industries also has ongoing projects
to evaluate Smart Sponge and other polymers to determine absorption performance under varying conditions and with a variety of
contaminants. This testing not only provides independent verification of product performance but also allows AbTech Industries
to provide more reliable information to customers about the product’s performance under various field conditions. In addition,
AbTech Industries is evaluating various polymer combinations as the field of polymer science continues to evolve.
AbTech Industries’ strategy on all
of these projects is to partner with third parties (universities, engineering companies and other commercial partners) for experimentation
and validation of proposed concepts. AbTech Industries has worked cooperatively with North Carolina State University, University
of North Carolina Coastal Studies Institute, West Virginia University National Environmental Service Center, Millsaps College,
California State University at Fullerton, Alden Labs, APEX Laboratories, Brooks Rand, ABC Labs, NAMSA and Hydroqual, Inc. (now
HDR, Inc.), on various projects and is looking at other qualified partners for specific projects.
Manufacturing and Engineering
The polymer raw materials used by the Company
to manufacture Smart Sponge are readily available from the petrochemical industry. These polymers are used extensively in other
non-related consumer products, road paving materials and various component parts in the auto industry. The Company’s primary
suppliers of these polymers are Harwick Standard Distribution Corp., LCY Elastomers, SK Global Chemicals and JS Tech, Ltd. The
Company’s supplier of corrugated plastic used in the manufacture of UUFs is Numatech West (KMP) LLC. The antimicrobial agent
used by the Company in manufacturing Smart Sponge Plus material was procured from Apollo Chemical Company although no purchases
of this material were made in either 2017 or 2016.
AbTech Industries currently plans to handle
the production of its Smart Sponge products at its 13,000 square foot manufacturing facility in Phoenix, Arizona. The Company made
its first attempt at manufacturing the Ironwood heavy metal media at its Phoenix facility in 2016 on a relatively small scale with
a temporary setup. In 2017 the Company installed equipment and infrastructure to establish a more permanent capability for the
production of Ironwood and has conducted trial runs with the newly installed equipment. Currently, the Company intends to outsource
the manufacture of its evaporative technology products to an outside vendor. As demand for Smart Sponge products increases, AbTech
Industries, while maintaining its core engineering and manufacturing competencies, may begin to develop a manufacturing outsourcing
network capable of supplying existing and future products around the world although there are no current plans for such a network.
For now, AbTech Industries will fully utilize its internal manufacturing capabilities. While maximizing the capacity of its current
facility, AbTech Industries may, in the future, search out and train outsourcing partners in the United States and other regions.
As production volumes increase, AbTech Industries intends to further evaluate the value proposition of outsourcing the manufacture
of all components and most of the finished products, focusing on total quality and consistency. Due to the very atypical process
and equipment used in AbTech Industries’ manufacturing, it is unclear at this time if a suitable manufacturing partner exists.
Regulatory
In 2009, AbTech Industries filed an application
with the EPA for registration of Smart Sponge Plus under FIFRA. In July 2010, AbTech Industries received notice of a time-limited
registration under FIFRA from the EPA that contained certain conditions requiring AbTech Industries to submit additional acute
aquatic toxicity data regarding the active ingredient in Smart Sponge Plus to the EPA. Subsequently, the EPA granted various extensions
of the time-limited registration to December 31, 2014. In December 2014, the Company received notice from the EPA that the conditional
registration for its Smart Sponge Plus products was no longer subject to a time limitation and the pending submission of additional
data, as required by the EPA’s original time-limited conditional registration approval, will not be required from AbTech
until the agency requires all registrants of similar products to submit such data. Under the current registration, the Company
is allowed to sell its Smart Sponge Plus products for the intended uses with EPA approved labeling. The EPA registration number
for Smart Sponge Plus is 86256-1. The Company has also registered Smart Sponge Plus in many states within the United States of
America. In the state of California, the Company’s application for the registration of Smart Sponge Plus has been denied
and the Company currently is not able to sell Smart Sponge Plus products in the state of California. While the Company is continuing
its efforts to obtain regulatory approval in the state of California, there is no assurance that such approval will be granted.
Employees
As of March 30, 2018, we had 13 full-time
employees and no part-time employees. Six of these individuals are involved in sales and marketing; three in production; one in
engineering and three in administrative functions.
Where You Can Find More Information
We are required to file Annual Reports
on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and other information with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “SEC”). The public can obtain copies of these materials by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference
Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549, by calling the SEC at 1-800-732-0330, or by accessing the SEC’s
website at
http://www.sec.gov
. Links to these reports can also be found on our website at www.abtechindustries.com, under
the INVESTORS section of the website.
Our business and an investment in our
common stock is subject to a variety of risks. The following risk factors describe the most significant events, facts or circumstances
that could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operations, ability to implement our
business plan and the market price for our common stock. Many of these events are outside of our control. If any of these risks
actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially adversely affected. In such case,
the trading price of our common stock could decline and investors in our common stock could lose all or part of their investment.
Other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K include additional factors that could materially and adversely impact our business,
financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, we operate in a rapidly changing environment. Other known risks that we
currently believe to be immaterial could become material in the future. We are also subject to legal and regulatory changes. New
factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible to predict the impact of all these factors on our business, financial condition
and results of operations. As used in this “Risk Factors” section, the terms “Company,” “we,”
our” and like words mean Abtech Holdings together with Abtech Industries, unless the context otherwise requires.
Risks Relating to Our Business
Our ability to generate revenue to support
our operations is uncertain.
We are in the early growth stage of our
business and have a limited history of generating revenues. We have a limited operating history upon which you can evaluate our
potential for future success, and we are subject to the additional risks affecting early-stage businesses. Rather than relying
on historical information, financial or otherwise, to evaluate our Company, you should evaluate our Company in light of your assessment
of the growth potential of our business and the expenses, delays, uncertainties, and complications typically encountered by early-stage
businesses, many of which will be beyond our control. Early-stage businesses in rapidly evolving markets commonly face risks, such
as the following:
|
·
|
unanticipated problems, delays, and expenses relating
to the development and implementation of their business plans;
|
|
·
|
operational difficulties;
|
|
·
|
lack of sufficient capital;
|
|
·
|
competition from more advanced enterprises; and
|
|
·
|
uncertain revenue generation.
|
Our limited operating history may make
it difficult for us to forecast accurately our operating results.
Our planned expense levels are, and will
continue to be, based in part on our expectations, which are difficult to forecast accurately based on our stage of development
and factors outside of our control. We may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected developments.
Further, business development expenses may increase significantly as we expand operations. To the extent that any unexpected expenses
precede, or are not rapidly followed by, a corresponding increase in revenue, our business, operating results, and financial condition
may be materially and adversely affected.
We have a history of losses that may
continue, which may negatively impact our ability to achieve our business objectives.
We have incurred net losses since our inception.
The Company had a net loss of approximately $4.3 million during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. We cannot assure you that
we can achieve or sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. There can be no assurance that future operations
will be profitable. We may not achieve our business objectives and the failure to achieve such goals would have an adverse impact
on us.
Our success depends on our ability to
expand, operate, and manage successfully our operations.
Our success depends on our ability to expand,
operate, and manage successfully our operations. Our ability to expand successfully will depend upon a number of factors, including
the following:
|
·
|
signing with strategic partners, dominant in their
field;
|
|
·
|
the continued development of our business;
|
|
·
|
the hiring, training, and retention of additional personnel;
|
|
·
|
the ability to enhance our operational, financial,
and management systems;
|
|
·
|
the availability of adequate financing;
|
|
·
|
general economic and business conditions; and
|
|
·
|
the ability to implement methods for revenue generation.
|
If we are unable to obtain additional
capital, our business operations could be harmed.
The development and expansion of our business
will require additional funds. In the future, we may seek additional equity or debt financing to provide capital for our Company.
Such financing may not be available or may not be available on satisfactory terms. If financing is not available on satisfactory
terms, we may be unable to expand our operations. While debt financing will enable us to expand our business more rapidly than
we otherwise would be able to do, debt financing increases expenses and we must repay the debt regardless of our operating results.
Our inability or failure to timely repay such indebtedness could cause significant harm to our financial position and harm our
business and operations. Future equity financings could result in dilution to our stockholders.
The most recent global financial crisis,
which has included, among other things, significant reductions in available capital and liquidity from banks and other providers
of credit, substantial reductions or fluctuations in equity and currency values worldwide, and concerns that similar crisis may
occur in the future, may make it difficult for us to raise additional capital or obtain additional credit, when needed, on acceptable
terms or at all.
Our inability to obtain adequate capital
resources, whether in the form of equity or debt, to fund our business and growth strategies, may require us to delay, scale back,
or eliminate some or all of our operations, which may adversely affect our financial results and ability to operate as a going
concern.
You may suffer significant dilution
if we raise additional capital.
If we raise additional capital, we expect
it will be necessary for us to issue additional equity or convertible debt securities. If we issue equity or convertible debt securities,
the price at which we offer such securities may not bear any relationship to our value, the net tangible book value per share may
decrease, the percentage ownership of our current stockholders would be diluted, and any equity securities we may issue in such
offering or upon conversion of convertible debt securities issued in such offering, may have rights, preferences, or privileges
with respect to liquidation, dividends, redemption, voting, and other matters that are senior to or more advantageous than our
common stock.
We have completed debt financings and
face risks associated with financing our operations.
The Company has completed several debt
financings and is subject to the normal risks associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow will be insufficient
to meet required payments of principal and interest and the risk that we will not be able to renew, repay, or refinance our debt
when it matures or that the terms of any renewal or refinancing will not be as favorable as the existing terms of that debt. As
of December 31, 2017, the Company had $1 million of outstanding indebtedness under three promissory notes payable. In March 2017,
the debt holder and the Company mutually agreed to extend the maturity dates of these notes to April 30, 2017. As of December 31,
2017, this $1 million of outstanding debt was in technical default because it had not been extended or repaid as of its maturity
date. In addition, the Company had $45,546 of additional outstanding debt that matures in 2018, other debt of $7,413,000 with no
specific due date which may become due in 2018, and accrued interest payable of $1,005,983. Our level of indebtedness may restrict
our operations now or in the future.
We are presently in technical default
under three promissory notes for not repaying the obligations owed thereunder prior to maturity. Should the holders of such notes
pursue collection or any other remedies to which they are entitled, this would be expected to have a material adverse effect on
our operations.
As of December 31, 2017, we were in default
under three promissory notes payable with an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 outstanding for failure to repay the obligations
thereunder prior to maturity. We currently do not have sufficient liquidity, including cash on hand, to repay this indebtedness.
While the Company does not expect the noteholder to accelerate the indebtedness, the noteholder may do so at any time, or may initiate
foreclosure actions, or seek any other remedies permitted by the terms of the notes and applicable law. There can be no assurances
that the noteholder will not accelerate. We are currently in discussions to extend the maturity date and have the event of default
waived; however, there can be no assurances that such discussions will be successful. Should the debtholder seek to accelerate
the indebtedness, the Company could be required to discontinue or significantly reduce the scope of its operations if no other
means of financing or refinancing are available. Such acceleration of the indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on
our operations and financial condition.
We have debt outstanding that is secured
by all of the assets of the Company.
During 2014 and 2015, we issued promissory
notes that were secured by all of the assets of the Company, including its intellectual property. As of December 31, 2017, two
secured promissory notes, having a senior security interest in the assets of the Company and an aggregate principal amount of $294,546,
were outstanding. If we are unable to pay our obligations to our secured lenders, they could proceed against any or all of the
collateral securing our indebtedness to them which could prevent the Company from continuing its operations in whole or in part.
You may suffer dilution if the secured
notes are converted to common stock.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company had
$794,546 of convertible notes outstanding that, if converted, would require the company to issue approximately 3.1 million shares
of common stock. In addition, the Company may offer more favorable conversion terms to the holders of the convertible notes if
it determines that the conversion of such notes on the more favorable terms is in the best interest of the Company. Such conversion
would cause the percentage ownership of our current stockholders to be diluted.
We have other debt outstanding that
may eventually be converted to common stock.
During the years ended December 31, 2017
and 2016, the Company received cash advances totaling $7,413,000 from related party stockholders holding more than 5% of our shares
of outstanding common stock. The Company may offer these debt holders the option to convert their debt to common stock in the future
if the Company is unable to repay the debt or if it determines that the conversion of such debt will be in the best interest of
the Company. Such conversion would cause the percentage ownership of our current stockholders to be diluted and may depress the
market price of our common stock.
Our independent auditors have expressed
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, which may hinder our ability to obtain future
financing.
In their report dated April 3, 2018, our
independent registered public accounting firm included an emphasis-of-matter paragraph with respect to our financial statements
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 concerning the Company’s assumption that it will continue as a going concern.
Our ability to continue as a going concern is an issue raised as a result of recurring losses from operations. To date, each of
Abtech Holdings and AbTech Industries has only incurred net operating losses resulting in a significant accumulated deficit. Our
ability to continue as a going concern is subject to our ability to obtain necessary funding from outside sources, including obtaining
additional funding from the sale of our securities, and to generate revenue from our operations. Our continued net operating losses
increase the difficulty in meeting such goals and there can be no assurances that such methods will prove successful. The Company
plans to raise additional capital in the near term and is currently considering the various options available for raising such
capital.
We depend on our officers and key employees
who would be difficult to replace, and our business will likely be harmed if we lose their services or cannot hire additional qualified
personnel.
Our success depends substantially on the
efforts and abilities of our officers and other key employees. AbTech Industries has employment agreements with its chief executive
officer and its chief financial officer, and certain key employees, but we do not think those agreements limit any employee’s
ability to terminate his or her employment. We have key person life insurance on Glenn R. Rink, our president, chief executive
officer and a director, but we do not have key person life insurance covering any of our other officers or other key employees.
The loss of services of one or more of our officers or key employees or the inability to add key personnel could have a material
adverse effect on our business. Competition for experienced personnel in our industry is substantial. Our success depends in part
on our ability to attract, hire, and retain qualified personnel. In addition, if any of our officers or other key employees join
a competitor or form a competing company, we may lose some of our customers.
We depend on the recruitment and retention
of qualified personnel, and our failure to attract and retain such personnel could seriously harm our business.
Due to the specialized nature of our business,
our future performance is highly dependent upon the continued services of current and future key personnel and managers. Our future
business depends upon our ability to attract and retain qualified engineering, manufacturing, marketing, sales, and management
personnel for our operations. We may also have to compete with the other companies in our industry in the recruitment and retention
of qualified managerial and technical employees. Competition for personnel is intense and confidentiality and non-compete agreements
may restrict our ability to hire individuals employed by other companies. Therefore, we may not be successful in attracting or
retaining qualified personnel. Our failure to attract and retain qualified personnel could seriously harm our business, results
of operations, and financial condition. Furthermore, we may not be able to accurately forecast our needs for additional personnel,
which could adversely affect our ability to grow.
The effects of the most recent global
economic downturn may continue to have an adverse impact on our business, operating results, or financial condition.
The most recent global economic downturn
caused disruptions and volatility in global financial markets and increased rates of default and bankruptcy and has impacted levels
of consumer and commercial spending. While the global economy is recovering, we are unable to predict the duration, severity or
pace of recovery of the global economic and financial crisis, or the long-term effects it will have on our business. There can
be no assurance that any actions we may take in response to any future deterioration in general economic and financial conditions
will be sufficient. A protracted continuation or worsening of global economic conditions or disruptions in the financial markets
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
If we do not achieve broad market acceptance
of our products and services, we may not be successful.
Although we believe our products and services
will serve existing needs in the markets in which we operate, our delivery of these products and services is unique and subject
to broad market acceptance. As is typical of any new product or service, the demand for and market acceptance of these products
and services are highly uncertain. We cannot assure you that any of our products and services will be commercialized on a widespread
basis. The commercial acceptance of our products and services may be affected by a number of factors, including the willingness
of municipalities and other commercial and industrial entities to use our products and services to control the quality of water
and other fluids. If the markets for our products and services fail to develop on a meaningful basis, if they develop more slowly
than we anticipate, or if our products and services fail to achieve sufficient market acceptance, our business and future results
of operations could be adversely affected.
Because our products may be designed
to provide a solution which competes with existing methods, we are likely to face resistance to change, which could impede our
ability to commercialize our business.
Our products are designed to provide a
solution to environmental challenges created by contaminated water and other fluids. Currently, large and well capitalized companies
provide services in these areas. These competitors have strong relationships with their customers’ personnel, and there is
a natural reluctance for businesses to change to new technologies, particularly in such industries as the oil and gas industries
where our future products may be relevant. This reluctance is increased when potential customers make significant capital investments
in competing technologies. Because of these obstacles, we may face substantial barriers to commercializing our business.
If we experience rapid growth and we
are not able to manage our growth successfully, our inability to manage the growth could adversely affect our business, financial
condition, and results of operations.
Rapid growth places a significant strain
on financial, operational, and managerial resources. While we engage in strategic and operational planning to adequately manage
anticipated growth, there can be no assurance that we will be able to implement and subsequently improve operations and financial
systems successfully and in a timely manner to fully manage our growth. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage
our growth and any inability to successfully manage growth could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition,
and results of operation.
We have no experience in manufacturing
or assembling products on a large scale basis and, if we do not develop adequate manufacturing and assembly processes and capabilities
to do so in a timely manner, we may be unable to achieve our growth and profitability objectives.
We have no experience manufacturing or
assembling products on a large scale. We do not know whether our current or future manufacturing arrangements will be able to develop
efficient, low-cost manufacturing capabilities and processes that will enable us to meet the quality, price, engineering, design
and production standards, or production volumes required to successfully mass market such products. Even if we are successful in
developing manufacturing capabilities and processes, we do not know whether we will do so in time to meet our product commercialization
schedule or to satisfy the requirements of our target market. Our failure to develop these manufacturing processes and capabilities,
if necessary, in a timely manner, could prevent us from achieving our growth and profitability objectives.
If we fail to continue to develop or
acquire new products, adapt to rapid and significant technological change, and respond to introductions of new products, we will
not be competitive.
Our growth strategy includes significant
investment in and expenditures for product development. We intend to sell products, primarily in the water clean-up sector, which
are characterized by rapid and significant technological changes, frequent new product and service introductions, and enhancements
and evolving industry standards. Without the timely introduction of new products, services, and enhancements, our products and
services may become technologically obsolete over time, in which case our revenue and operating results would suffer.
In addition, our competitors may adapt
more quickly to new technologies and changes in customers’ requirements than we can. The products that we are currently developing
or those that we will develop in the future may not be technologically feasible or accepted by the marketplace, and our products
or technologies could become uncompetitive or obsolete.
The market for our products is highly
competitive, and there can be no assurance that competitors will not emerge with comparable products or technologies.
The markets for our products and services
are expected to remain highly competitive. While we believe our products are unique and have some patent protection for the underlying
technologies, or unique trade secrets, there can be no assurance that competitors will not emerge with comparable products or technologies.
There are a number of large companies involved in the same businesses as us, but with larger more established sales and marketing
organizations, technical staff, and financial resources. We may establish marketing and distribution partnerships or alliances
with some of these companies, but there can be no assurance that such alliances will be formed.
Our business may become substantially
dependent on contracts that are awarded through competitive bidding processes.
We may sell a significant portion of our
products pursuant to contracts that are subject to competitive bidding, including contracts with municipal authorities. Competition
for, and the negotiation and award of, contracts present varied risks, including, but not limited to:
|
·
|
investment of substantial time and resources by management for the preparation of bids and proposals
with no assurance that a contract will be awarded to us;
|
|
·
|
the requirement to certify as to compliance with numerous laws (for example, socio-economic, small
business, and domestic preference) for which a false or incorrect certification can lead to civil and criminal penalties;
|
|
·
|
the need to estimate accurately the resources and cost structure required to service a contract;
and
|
|
·
|
the expenses and delays that we might suffer if our competitors protest a contract awarded to us,
including the potential that the contract may be terminated and a new bid competition may be conducted.
|
If we are unable to win contracts awarded
through the competitive bidding process, we may not be able to operate in the market for products and services that are provided
under those contracts for a number of years. If we are unable to consistently win new contract awards over any extended period,
or if we fail to anticipate all of the costs and resources that will be required to secure and perform such contract awards, our
growth strategy and our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
We will sell products and services to
companies in industries which tend to be extremely cyclical; downturns in those industries would adversely affect our results of
operations.
The growth and profitability of our business
will depend on sales to industries that are subject to cyclical downturns. Slowdowns in these industries may adversely affect sales
by our businesses, which in turn would adversely affect our revenues and results of operations. In particular, our products may
be sold to and used by the oil and gas industry, which historically has realized significant shifts in activity and spending due
to fluctuations in commodity prices. Our revenues may be dependent upon spending by oil and gas producers; therefore, a reduction
in spending by producers may have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, and results of operations.
The industries in which we may sell
our products are heavily regulated and costs associated with such regulation could reduce our profitability.
Federal, state, and local authorities extensively
regulate the stormwater and oil and gas industries, which are primary industries in which we may sell our products and offer our
services. Legislation and regulations affecting the industries are under constant review for amendment or expansion. State and
local authorities regulate various aspects of stormwater and oil and gas activities that ultimately affect how customers use our
products and how we develop and market our products. The overall regulatory burden on the industries increases the cost of doing
business, which, in turn, decreases profitability.
International sales are also subject to
rules and regulations promulgated by regulatory bodies within foreign jurisdictions, and there can be no assurance that such foreign
regulatory bodies will not adopt laws or regulatory requirements that could adversely affect our Company.
If chemical companies engage in predatory
pricing, we may lose customers, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Municipalities and other commercial and
industrial entities traditionally have used chemicals to control the quality of water and other fluids. The chemical companies
represent a significant competitive factor. The chemical companies who supply chemicals to such municipalities and other commercial
and industrial entities may, in order to maintain their business relationship, drastically reduce their price and seek to undercut
the pricing at which we can realistically charge for our products and services. While predatory pricing that is designed to drive
us out of business may be illegal under the United States anti-trust and other laws, we may lose customers as a result of any future
predatory pricing and be required to file lawsuits against any companies who engage in such improper tactics. Any such litigation
may be very expensive which will further impact us and affect their financial condition. As a result, predatory pricing by chemical
companies could materially and adversely affect us.
We are, or in the future may be, subject
to substantial regulation related to quality standards applicable to our manufacturing and quality processes. Our failure to comply
with applicable quality standards could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
The EPA regulates the registration, manufacturing,
and sales and marketing of products in our industry, and those of our distributors and partners, in the United States. Significant
government regulation also exists in overseas markets. Compliance with applicable regulatory requirements is subject to continual
review and is monitored through periodic inspections and other review and reporting mechanisms.
Failure by us or our partners to comply
with current or future governmental regulations and quality assurance guidelines could lead to temporary manufacturing shutdowns,
product recalls or related field actions, product shortages, or delays in product manufacturing. Specifically, with regard to the
EPA’s conditional approval of the registration of our Smart Sponge Plus products under FIFRA, if the EPA makes additional
information requests in the future that we are unable comply with, the EPA’s conditional approval of our registration of
Smart Sponge Plus products under FIFRA could be suspended and the Company would then not be able to sell Smart Sponge Plus products.
However, the expiration of the conditional approval of Smart Sponge Plus products would not affect our ability to continue to sell
the regular Smart Sponge products that do not include an antimicrobial agent. (see PART I. Item 1. “BUSINESS – Regulatory”
on page 18 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Efficacy or safety concerns and/or manufacturing quality issues with respect to
our products or those of our partners could lead to product recalls, fines, withdrawals, declining sales, and/or our failure to
successfully commercialize new products or otherwise achieve revenue growth.
Recent changes to U.S. tax laws may
adversely affect our financial condition or results of operation and create the risk that we may need to adjust our accounting
for these changes.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”),
enacted on December 22, 2017, makes significant changes to U.S. tax laws and includes numerous provisions that affect businesses,
including ours. The Act is unclear in certain respects and will require interpretations and implementing regulations by the Internal
Revenue Service, as well as state tax authorities, and the Act could be subject to amendments and technical corrections, any of
which could lessen or increase the adverse (and positive) impacts of the Act. The accounting treatment of these tax law changes
is complex, and some of the changes may affect both current and future periods. Others will primarily affect future periods. Consistent
with guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission, our financial statements reflect our estimates of the tax effects of
the Act on us to the extent we have been able to make such preliminary determinations. Although we believe these estimates are
reasonable, they are provisional and may be adjusted prior to the end of 2018. We intend to complete accounting for the Act by
the end of fiscal 2018. Any adjustments to our provisional estimates or the effects of currently unknown impacts of the Act on
us could affect our current or future financial statements, or both.
The imposition of tariffs or duties
on imported metals could significantly increase the price of the metals we purchase from international suppliers and/or shortages
in the supply of raw materials.
On April 19, 2017, the U.S. Department
of Commerce (the “DOC”) initiated an investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to determine
the effects of steel imports on U.S. national security. On January 11, 2018, the DOC submitted its investigation report to the
President, who, on March 8, 2018, signed two Presidential Proclamations imposing a 25% tariff on steel, and a 10% tariff on aluminum,
imported from all countries except Canada and Mexico beginning on March 23, 2018. The imposition of these, or any future imposition
of tariffs or duties, is expected to have a pervasive impact on the metals market in which we operate and could result in a decrease
in imports and higher prices for those imports which are sold into the U.S. If we buy metals internationally, we may be unable
to pass through the higher costs to our customers, which could adversely impact our financial condition and operating results.
In addition, a decrease in imports could cause a disruption or shortage in the availability of the raw materials that we buy, which
could limit our ability to meet our customer's demand or purchase material at competitive prices. This could cause us to lose sales,
incur additional costs, or suffer harm to our reputation, all of which may adversely affect our operating results.
If a natural or man-made disaster strikes
our or a third-party’s manufacturing facility that we may use, we may be unable to manufacture our products for a substantial
amount of time and our sales and profitability will decline.
The manufacturing facility and manufacturing
equipment we use to produce our products will be costly to replace and could require substantial lead-time to repair or replace.
Our facility or a third-party’s facility that we use may be affected by natural or man-made disasters. In the event they
were affected by a disaster, we would be forced to set up alternative production capacity, or rely on third-party manufacturers
to whom we would have to disclose our trade secrets. Although we possess insurance for damage to our property and the disruption
of our business from casualties, such insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of our potential losses, may not continue to
be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all, and may not address the marketing and goodwill consequences of our inability
to provide products for an extended period of time.
We may decide to outsource manufacturing
in the future. Dependence on contract manufacturing and outsourcing other portions of our supply chain may adversely affect our
ability to bring products to market and damage our reputation.
As part of our efforts to streamline operations
and to cut costs in the future, we may decide to outsource aspects of our manufacturing processes and other functions. If our contract
manufacturers or other outsourcers fail to perform their obligations in a timely manner or at satisfactory quality levels, our
ability to bring products to market and our reputation could suffer. For example, during a market upturn, our contract manufacturers
may be unable to meet our demand requirements, which may preclude us from fulfilling our customers’ orders on a timely basis.
The ability of these manufacturers to perform is largely outside of our control. Additionally, outsourcing may take place in developing
countries and, as a result, may be subject to geopolitical uncertainty.
The success of our businesses will depend
on our ability to effectively develop and implement strategic business initiatives.
We are currently implementing various strategic
business initiatives. In connection with the development and implementation of these initiatives, we will incur additional expenses
and capital expenditures to implement the initiatives. The development and implementation of these initiatives also requires management
to divert a portion of its time from day-to-day operations. These expenses and diversions could have a significant impact on our
operations and profitability, particularly if the initiatives prove to be unsuccessful. Moreover, if we are unable to implement
an initiative in a timely manner, or if those initiatives turn out to be ineffective or are executed improperly, our business and
operating results would be adversely affected.
Failure to successfully reduce our current
or future production costs may adversely affect our financial results.
A significant portion of our strategy will
rely upon our ability to successfully rationalize and improve the efficiency of our operations. In particular, our strategy relies
on our ability to reduce our production costs in order to remain competitive. If we are unable to continue to successfully implement
cost reduction measures, or if these efforts do not generate the level of cost savings that we expect going forward or result in
higher than expected costs, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations,
or cash flows.
If we are unable to make necessary capital
investments or respond to pricing pressures, our business may be harmed.
In order to remain competitive, we need
to invest in research and development, manufacturing, customer service and support, and marketing. From time to time, we may have
to adjust the prices of our products and services to remain competitive. We may not have available sufficient financial or other
resources to continue to make investments necessary to maintain our competitive position.
Failure to obtain sufficient supply
of component materials to conduct our business may have an adverse effect on our production and revenue targets.
Our component and materials’ suppliers
may fail to meet our needs. We intend to manufacture our products using materials and components procured from a limited number
of third-party suppliers. We do not currently have long-term supply contracts with our suppliers. This generally serves to reduce
our commitment risk, but does expose us to supply risk and to price increases that we may have to pass on to our customers. In
some cases, supply shortages and delays in delivery may result in curtailed production or delays in production, which can contribute
to an increase in inventory levels and loss of profit. We expect that shortages and delays in deliveries of some components will
occur from time to time. If we are unable to obtain sufficient components on a timely basis, we may experience manufacturing delays,
which could harm our relationships with current or prospective customers and reduce our sales. We may also not be able to obtain
competitive pricing for some of our supplies compared to our competitors. We also cannot assure that the component and materials
from domestic suppliers will be of similar quality or quantity as those imported component and materials, which may lead to rejections
of component and materials by our customers. In the event the domestic component and materials do not perform as well as the imported
component and materials or do not perform at all, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely
affected.
We have limited product distribution
experience and we expect to rely on third parties who may not successfully sell our products.
We have limited product distribution experience
and currently rely and plan to rely on product distribution arrangements with third parties. We may also license our technology
to certain third parties for commercialization of certain applications. We expect to enter into distribution agreements and/or
licensing agreements in the future, and we may not be able to enter into these agreements on terms that are favorable to us, if
at all. In addition, we may have limited or no control over the distribution activities of these third parties. These third parties
could sell competing products and may devote insufficient sales efforts to our products. As a result, our future revenues from
sales of our products, if any, will depend on the success of the efforts of these third parties.
We could face significant liabilities
in connection with our technology, products, and business operations, which if incurred beyond any insurance limits, would adversely
affect our business and financial condition.
We are subject to a variety of potential
liabilities connected to our technology development and business operations, such as potential liabilities related to environmental
risks. As a business which manufactures and/or markets products for use by consumers and institutions, we may become liable for
any damage caused by our products, whether used in the manner intended or not. Any such claim of liability, whether meritorious
or not, could be time-consuming and/or result in costly litigation. Although we have obtained insurance against certain of these
risks, no assurance can be given that such insurance will be adequate to cover related liabilities or will be available in the
future or, if available, that premiums will be commercially justifiable. If we were to incur any substantial liability and related
damages were not covered by our insurance or exceeded policy limits, or if we were to incur such liability at a time when we are
not able to obtain liability insurance, our business, financial conditions, and results of operations could be materially adversely
affected.
Our failure to protect our intellectual
property rights may undermine our competitive position, and litigation to protect our intellectual property rights or defend against
third-party allegations of infringement may result in significant costs, which could harm our financial position and results of
operations.
Our success will depend in part on our
ability to develop patentable products and obtain and enforce patent protection for our products in the United States and other
countries. We intend to file applications, as appropriate, for patents covering our products. Patents may not be issued for any
pending or future patent applications owned by or licensed to us, and the claims allowed under any issued patents may not be sufficiently
broad to protect our technology. Any issued patents owned by or licensed to us may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented,
and the rights under these patents may not provide us with competitive advantages. In addition, competitors may design around our
technology or develop competing technologies. Intellectual property rights may also be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries,
which could make it easier for competitors to capture increased market position. We could incur substantial costs to defend suits
brought against us or suits in which we may assert our patent rights against others. An unfavorable outcome of any such litigation
could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We may also rely on trade secrets and proprietary
know-how with which we seek to protect our products, in part by confidentiality agreements with our collaborators, employees, and
consultants. Nevertheless, these agreements afford only limited protection, and the actions we take to protect our intellectual
property rights may not be adequate. These agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In
addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently developed by our competitors. As a result, third parties
may infringe or misappropriate our proprietary technologies or other intellectual property rights, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or operating results.
In addition, policing unauthorized use
of proprietary technology can be difficult and expensive. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights,
protect our trade secrets, or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. We cannot assure you that the
outcome of any litigation will be in our favor. Intellectual property litigation may be costly and may divert management attention,
as well as expend our other resources away from our business. An adverse determination in any such litigation will impair our intellectual
property rights and may harm our business, prospects, and reputation. In addition, we have no insurance coverage against litigation
costs and would have to bear all costs arising from such litigation to the extent we are unable to recover them from other parties.
The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial
condition.
The SEC is conducting an investigation
involving the Company, the results of which could have a material impact on the Company financial position, operating results,
and cash flows.
On May 28, 2015, the Company received a
subpoena that stated that the staff of the SEC is conducting an investigation
In the Matter of Abtech Holdings, Inc. (NY-9262)
(see PART I. Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” below). In 2016 and 2017, the SEC issued additional subpoenas pertaining to
this investigation to two officers, a director, a prior director, a prior employee of the Company, the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm and several law firms who have counseled the Company. We cannot estimate the full impact that
this investigation and any results it may have on the Company’s financial position, operating results or cash flows. In addition
to significant monetary costs and the impact on our business as a result of the subpoena and investigation, and any outcome thereof,
there may be adverse publicity associated with this matter that could result in reputational harm to us that may adversely affect
our business, stock price, results of operations and financial condition. Further, the investigation has caused senior management
to divert significant time and resources from managing the business operations. We have not yet recorded a liability related to
the cost of resolving of this matter although we have incurred and recognized material compliance costs to date. At this time,
no estimate of the possible loss or range of loss can be made. In the meantime, we are continuing to incur significant legal fees
for compliance with the SEC subpoenas.
Operational and Structural Risks
We can provide no assurances as to our
future financial performance or the investment result of a purchase of our common stock.
Any projected results of operations involve
significant risks and uncertainty, should be considered speculative, and depend on various assumptions which may not be correct.
The future performance of our Company and the return on our common stock depends on a complex series of events that are beyond
our control and that may or may not occur. Actual results for any period may or may not approximate any assumptions that are made
and may differ significantly from such assumptions. We can provide no assurance or prediction as to our future profitability or
to the ultimate success of an investment in our common stock.
The compensation we pay to our executive
officers and employees will likely increase, which will affect our future profitability.
We believe that the compensation we have
historically paid to our executive officers is within the lower quartile of compensation paid by peer companies. An increase in
compensation and bonuses payable to our executive officers and employees could decrease our net income.
As a public reporting company, we are
subject to corporate governance and internal control reporting requirements, and our costs related to compliance with, or our failure
to comply with, existing and future requirements, could adversely affect our business.
We may face new corporate governance requirements
under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”), as well as new rules and regulations subsequently adopted by the SEC
and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. These laws, rules, and regulations continue to evolve and may become increasingly
stringent in the future. We are required to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of SOX (“Section
404”). We are a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act. Section 404 requires us to include
an internal control report with our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The report must include management’s assessment of the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the fiscal year. This report must also include disclosure of
any material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting that we have identified. Failure to comply, or any adverse
results from such evaluation, could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports and have an adverse effect
on the trading price of our securities. We strive to continuously evaluate and improve our control structure to help ensure that
we comply with Section 404. The financial cost of compliance with these laws, rules, and regulations is expected to remain substantial.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to fully comply with these laws, rules, and regulations that address corporate governance,
internal control reporting, and similar matters. Failure to comply with these laws, rules, and regulations could materially adversely
affect our reputation, financial condition, and the value of our securities.
As a public company, we will have significant
operating costs relating to compliance requirements and our management is required to devote substantial time to compliance initiatives.
Our management has only limited experience
operating the Company as a public company. To operate effectively, we will be required to continue to implement changes in certain
aspects of our business and develop, manage, and train management level and other employees to comply with on-going public company
requirements. Failure to take such actions, or delay in the implementation thereof, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
SOX, as well as rules subsequently implemented
by the SEC, imposes various requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure
and financial controls and changes in corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a
substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial
compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly.
Risks Related to our Common Stock
A limited public trading market exists
for our common stock, which makes it more difficult for our stockholders to sell their common stock in the public markets.
Although our common stock is quoted on
the OTCQB under the symbol “ABHD,” there is a limited public market for our common stock. No assurance can be given
that an active market will develop or that a stockholder will ever be able to liquidate its shares of common stock without considerable
delay, if at all. Many brokerage firms may not be willing to effect transactions in our securities. Even if a purchaser finds a
broker willing to effect a transaction in our securities, the combination of brokerage commissions, state transfer taxes, if any,
and any other selling costs may exceed the selling price. Furthermore, our stock price may be impacted by factors that are unrelated
or disproportionate to our operating performance. These market fluctuations, as well as general economic, political, and market
conditions, such as recessions, interest rates, or international currency fluctuations may adversely affect the market price and
liquidity of our common stock.
Our stock price may be volatile.
The market price of our common stock is
likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control,
including the following:
|
·
|
limited “public float” in the hands of a small number of persons whose sales (or lack
of sales) could result in positive or negative pricing pressure on the market price for our common stock;
|
|
·
|
actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating
results;
|
|
·
|
changes in our earnings estimates;
|
|
·
|
our ability to obtain adequate working capital financing;
|
|
·
|
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
|
|
·
|
publication (or lack of publication) of research reports
about us;
|
|
·
|
changes in applicable laws or regulations, court rulings,
enforcement and legal actions;
|
|
·
|
loss of any strategic relationships;
|
|
·
|
additions or departures of key management personnel;
|
|
·
|
actions by our stockholders (including transactions
in our shares);
|
|
·
|
speculation in the press or investment community;
|
|
·
|
increases in market interest rates, which may increase
our cost of capital;
|
|
·
|
changes in our industry;
|
|
·
|
competitive pricing pressures;
|
|
·
|
our ability to execute our business plan; and
|
|
·
|
economic and other external factors.
|
In addition, the securities markets have
from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular
companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Our common stock may be subject to the
penny stock rules which may make it more difficult to sell our common stock.
The SEC has adopted regulations which generally
define a “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price, as defined, less than $5.00 per share or
an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities may be covered by the penny stock
rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers
and accredited investors, such as institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or an individual with net worth in excess of
$1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with his or her spouse. For transactions covered by this rule,
the broker-dealers must make a special suitability determination for the purchase and receive the purchaser’s written agreement
of the transaction prior to the sale. Consequently, the rule may affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and
also affect the ability of our stockholders to sell their shares in the secondary market.
FINRA sales practice requirements may
also limit a shareholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.
In addition to the “penny stock”
rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has adopted rules that require that in
recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable
for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative, low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers
must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives,
and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative,
low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers
to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse
effect on the market for our shares.
Our common shares are currently traded
at low volume, and you may be unable to sell at or near ask prices or at all if you need to sell or liquidate a substantial number
of shares at one time.
We cannot predict the extent to which an
active public market for our common stock will develop or be sustained. Our common shares are currently traded, but currently with
low volume, based on quotations on the OTCQB, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common shares at
or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. This situation is attributable to a number of factors,
including the fact that we are a small company which is still relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional
investors, and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention
of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would be reluctant to follow an unproven company such as ours or purchase or recommend
the purchase of our shares until such time as we became more seasoned and viable. As a consequence, there may be periods of several
days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large
and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. We
cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained,
or that trading levels will be sustained.
Shareholders should be aware that, according
to SEC Release No. 34-29093, the market for “penny stocks” has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and
abuse. Such patterns include: (1) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related
to the promoter or issuer; (2) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading
press releases; (3) boiler room practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced
sales persons; (4) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (5) the wholesale
dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with
the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses. Our management is aware of the abuses that
have occurred historically in the penny stock market, and we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market
or of broker-dealers who participate in the market. The occurrence of these patterns or practices could increase the future volatility
of our share price.
We have historically not paid dividends
and do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
We have historically not paid dividends
to our stockholders, and management does not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock to our stockholders for the
foreseeable future. Any determination we make regarding dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will
depend on our results of operations, our financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law,
and other factors our Board of Directors deem relevant. Even if the funds are legally available for distribution, we may nevertheless
decide not to pay any dividends or may be restricted from paying dividends due to the covenants in any future financing agreements.
We presently intend to retain future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business.
The elimination of monetary liability
against our directors, officers, and employees under Nevada law and the existence of indemnification rights to our directors, officers,
and employees may result in substantial expenditures by our Company and may discourage lawsuits against our directors, officers,
and employees.
Our articles of incorporation contain a
provision permitting us to eliminate the personal liability of our directors to our Company and shareholders for damages for breach
of fiduciary duty as a director or officer to the extent provided by Nevada law. We may also have contractual indemnification obligations
under our employment agreements with our officers. The foregoing indemnification obligations could result in our Company incurring
substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage awards against directors and officers, which we may be unable
to recoup. These provisions and resultant costs may also discourage our Company from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers
for breaches of their fiduciary duties, and may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by our shareholders against
our directors and officers even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit our Company and shareholders.
Two of our shareholders own a significant
amount of our voting stock and may have interests that differ from our other shareholders. As a result, these significant shareholders
may take actions that are not in the interests of our other shareholders.
Two of our shareholders collectively beneficially
own in the aggregate 79.6% of our issued and outstanding common stock, with one shareholder beneficially owning 66.6% of our issued
and outstanding common stock. Therefore, these shareholders have significant control over the outcome of matters submitted to a
vote of shareholders, including, but not limited to, electing directors, adopting amendments to our certificate of incorporation,
and approving corporate transactions. In addition, due to these shareholders’ significant ownership, they may approve certain
matters requiring shareholder approval by written consent without soliciting the votes of other shareholders. Circumstances may
occur in which the interests of these significant shareholders could be in conflict with the interests of our other shareholders,
and would have the requisite voting power to take actions that align with their individual interest and not the interests of our
other shareholders. Should conflicts of interest arise, we can provide no assurance that these significant shareholders would act
in the best interests of our other shareholders or that any conflicts of interest would be resolved in a manner favorable to our
other shareholders.
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
|
Not applicable.
We
currently lease an administrative office of 6,066 square feet located at 4110 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 235, Scottsdale, Arizona
85251. The Company also leases a 13,000 square foot space for its manufacturing facility located at 3610-2 E. Southern Ave., Phoenix,
Arizona 85040.
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
|
On May 28, 2015, the
Company received a subpoena from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that stated that the staff of
the SEC is conducting an investigation
In the Matter of Abtech Holdings, Inc. (NY-9262)
. Generally, the SEC’s
subpoena asked for all documents, agreements, and communications concerning (i) the Company’s Contract for Services with
Nassau County, New York, dated October 8, 2013; (ii) Dean Skelos, his son, Adam Skelos, who acted as a consultant to the Company,
and their related entities; (iii) SLC Clean Water, LLC, Axiom, Glenwood Management, and a number of other listed individuals and
entities; (iv) certain Board and Board committee minutes and related materials; (v) certain policies, procedures, and internal
controls in effect at the Company; (vi) certain communications with the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm, transfer agent, potential and current investors, broker-dealers, investment advisors, and finders; and (vii) certain other
organizational and financial account information of the Company. The Company has provided a substantial number of documents
in response to the SEC subpoena. In 2016 and 2017, the SEC issued additional subpoenas pertaining to this investigation to
two officers, a director, a prior director, a prior employee of the Company, the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm and several law firms who have counseled the Company from 2013 to the present.
The Company believes
the SEC’s subpoenas are a result of the complaint announced on May 4, 2015 that was filed by federal authorities against
Dean and Adam Skelos. That trial came to an end in December 2015 when both men were convicted of eight counts each, including fraud,
bribery and extortion of three separate companies – one of which was the Company. The Company cooperated fully with the United
States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York throughout the Skelos investigation and trial, by providing
subpoenaed documents and other evidence and having the Company’s president and CEO testify on behalf of the government at
the trial. In September 2017, a federal appeals panel overturned the 2015 corruption convictions of Dean Skelos and Adam Skelos.
The Company is uncertain at this point if it will have any further involvement in this matter.
The investigation by
the SEC is ongoing and no resolution can be predicted at this time. We have not yet recorded a liability related to the cost of
resolving this matter although we have incurred and recognized material compliance costs to date. At this time, no estimate of
the possible loss or range of loss can be made. In the meantime, we are continuing to incur significant legal fees for compliance
with the SEC subpoenas.
In May 2016, the Company,
AEWS and AbTech received letters from the New York State Joint Commission on Public Ethics (“JCOPE”) asking for a written
response to allegations constituting potential violations of lobbying laws in the state of New York. The Company’s legal
counsel provided a written response to JCOPE on May 31, 2016, wherein they presented the Company’s position that it has consistently
complied with all applicable lobbying laws. On August 15, 2016, JCOPE issued notices to the Company, AbTech and AEWS that JCOPE
had decided to commence an investigation to determine whether a substantial basis exists to conclude that the Company violated
lobbying laws in the state of New York. The Company intends to defend its position that it has consistently complied with all applicable
lobbying laws and is working with JCOPE to resolve this matter. However, it is not clear at this time how the matter will ultimately
be resolved.
In accordance with
the stockholder proposal approved by the Company’s stockholders at the May 13, 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Stockholder
Proposal”), the Company engaged legal counsel to assess whether the Company should pursue legal action to recover financial
losses and damages pertaining to the United States vs. Dean Skelos and Adam Skelos case. The Company, through its legal counsel,
is currently in discussions with one entity regarding damages claimed by the Company. However, it cannot be determined at this
time how this matter will ultimately be resolved.
As of December 31,
2017, the Company had incurred approximately $3,490,000 in legal fees and other costs related to the matters described above, including
approximately $1,431,000 incurred during 2017. The Company cannot estimate at this time the cost of additional legal representation
in resolving the SEC investigation, the JCOPE investigation or pursuing legal action pursuant to the Stockholder Proposal.
The Company has filed
a claim for coverage for some of these legal fees under a liability insurance policy. The insurer denied the claim and the Company
engaged legal counsel to dispute the insurer’s denial of the claim. After an unsuccessful attempt to resolve the dispute
through mediation, the Company filed a formal complaint against the insurer on July 11, 2016, in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York. In December 2016, the insurer remitted a payment to the Company of $465,187 for a portion
of the claim that the insurer determined to be covered by the policy. During 2017, the insurer remitted additional payments totaling
$1,138,984 to the Company, or directly to the applicable law firms, for legal fees related to these matters. The payments made
by the insurer were offset against other selling, general and administrative operating expenses in the periods in which such payments
were received. The ultimate outcome of the litigation with the insurer cannot be determined at this time.
|
ITEM 4.
|
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
|
Not applicable.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 – BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization and Description of Business
Abtech Holdings, Inc. (“ABHD”
or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on February 13, 2007, with authorized capital
stock of 300,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.001 par value. During 2015, the number of authorized shares of capital stock
was increased to 800,000,000. ABHD is the parent holding company.
AbTech Industries, Inc. (“AbTech”),
a Delaware corporation with an authorized capital of 15,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value common stock and 5,000,000 shares of
$0.01 par value preferred stock, was acquired by ABHD in a reverse acquisition transaction (the “Merger”) on February
10, 2011. AbTech is a majority-owned subsidiary of ABHD and is the operating company.
AbTech is an environmental technologies
firm that provides innovative solutions to address issues of water pollution. AbTech has developed and patented the Smart Sponge
®
polymer technology. This technology’s oil absorbing capabilities make it highly effective as a filtration media to remove
hydrocarbons and other pollutants from flowing or pooled water. AbTech has also licensed or developed other products that reduce
bacteria, remove heavy metals or reduce the volume of polluted water through evaporation. AbTech sells products and systems for
the treatment of stormwater, industrial process water and produced water in oil and gas extraction operations. The Company is headquartered
in Scottsdale, Arizona and has a manufacturing facility located in Phoenix, Arizona.
In 2012, the Company formed a subsidiary,
AEWS Engineering, LLC (“AEWS”), an independent civil and environmental engineering firm, established to provide engineering
and technology innovation to the water infrastructure sector. AEWS is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The operations
of AEWS, which focused on new business development activities, were transferred to AbTech in 2015. During 2017, AEWS closed its
office located in Raleigh, North Carolina and as of December 31, 2017, AEWS was dormant.
AbTech’s wholly-owned subsidiary,
Environmental Security Corporation (“ESC”), was formed by the Company in 2003 to develop a sensor array technology
designed to detect impurities in water flows. ESC owns a U.S. patent on this technology and has acquired rights to another monitoring
technology, but otherwise had no operations during 2017 or 2016.
The Company operates in one business segment
which is the filtration and treatment of polluted water.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation
–
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ABHD, AbTech, AEWS and ESC. Intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated. The shares of AbTech preferred stock that have not converted to shares of ABHD common stock
represent the non-controlling interest shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
–
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with a maturity of three months or less when acquired to be cash and cash
equivalents.
Use of Estimates
– The preparation
of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”)
requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates are used in determining
the allowance for doubtful accounts and obsolete inventory and in valuing stock-based compensation. Due to the uncertainties inherent
in the formulation of accounting estimates, and the significance of these items, it is reasonable to expect that the estimates
in connection with these items could be materially revised within the next year.
Concentration of Credit Risk
–
Credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counter parties failed completely
to perform as contracted. Concentrations of credit risk that arise from financial instruments exist for groups of customers or
counter parties when they have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations
to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions described below.
|
·
|
Cash and cash equivalents –
Financial instruments that
subject the Company to credit risk are cash balances maintained in excess of federal depository insurance limits. While the Company
does on occasion have cash balances in excess of federal depository insurance limits, at December 31, 2017, the Company’s
cash or cash equivalent balances were within the limits federally insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. To date,
the Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes the exposure is minimal.
|
|
·
|
Major customers and accounts receivable –
Major customers represent any customer that
accounts for more than 10% of revenues for the year. During 2017, the Company had one customer that accounted for 23% of revenues
and had an accounts receivable balance of zero at December 31, 2017. During 2016, the Company had one customer that accounted for
16% of revenues and had an accounts receivable balance of zero at December 31, 2016.
|
|
·
|
Supplier –
Major suppliers represent any vendor that accounts for more than 10% of
purchases for the year. During 2017, the Company had one vendor that accounted for 52% of its purchases and had an accounts payable
balance of zero at December 31, 2017. During 2016, the Company had three vendors that accounted for 35%, 16% and 15%, respectively,
of its purchases. All of these vendors had an accounts payable balance of zero at December 31, 2016.
|
Fair Values of Financial Assets and
Liabilities
– The Company measures and discloses certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Authoritative
guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit
price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
on the measurement date. Authoritative guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the
use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels
of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1
– Quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2
– Observable
inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not
active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of
the assets or liabilities.
Level 3
– Unobservable
inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
Inventories
– Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost computed on an average cost method which approximates the first-in, first-out
basis. Inventory costs include raw materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Provision is made for obsolete, slow-moving
or defective items when appropriate. The amount of any provision is recognized as an expense in the period the provision occurs.
Warranty Accrual
– The Company’s
products are subject to warranty periods of one year or less. The warranty accrual (see NOTE 8 – ACCRUED EXPENSES) is based
on management’s best estimate of expected costs associated with product failure and historical product failures. The Company
has not incurred any significant warranty claims to date.
Fixed Assets
– Fixed assets,
stated at cost, are depreciated on the straight-line method for financial statement reporting purposes, over the estimated useful
lives of the assets, which range from three to ten years. Leasehold improvement costs are depreciated over the shorter of the lease
term or their useful life. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Betterments or renewals are capitalized when
they occur.
Revenue Recognition
– The
Company recognizes revenue only when all of the following criteria have been met:
|
·
|
Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
|
|
·
|
Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
|
|
·
|
The fee for the arrangement is fixed or determinable; and
|
|
·
|
Collectability is reasonably assured.
|
Persuasive Evidence of an Arrangement
– The Company documents all terms of an arrangement in a quote signed or confirmed by the customer prior to recognizing revenue.
Delivery Has Occurred or Services Have
Been Performed
– The Company performs all services or delivers all products prior to recognizing revenue. Services are
considered to be performed when the services are complete.
The Fee for the Arrangement is Fixed
or Determinable
– Prior to recognizing revenue, a customer’s fee is either fixed or determinable under the terms
of the quote or accepted customer purchase order.
Collectability Is Reasonably Assured
– Collectability is assessed on a customer by customer basis based on criteria outlined by management.
In 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized
revenue from the sale of its Smart Sponge
®
and Smart Sponge Plus products, including Ultra-Urban
®
Filters, Line Skimmers, Passive Skimmers and Smart Paks
®
. The Smart Paks are usually sold as a component of an engineered
system such as an end-of-pipe vault or other larger multi-product treatment train. The Company provides engineering design services
on some engineered solutions. Revenues from design services are recognized at the time the engineering services are rendered. In
2016, the Company also recognized revenue from distributor fees charged for support of business development activities of the distributor.
These revenues were recognized after the services were rendered and upon receipt of payment from the distributor.
The Company recognizes shipping and handling
fees as revenue and the related expenses as a component of cost of sales. All internal handling charges are charged to selling,
general and administrative expenses.
The payment terms for sales made to customers
vary based on the credit worthiness of the particular customer and the size of the order. Some orders require prepayment of up
to 50% at the time the order is received, others require payment in full before shipping and others are made on terms requiring
payment within 30 days of the date of shipment. Customers do not have a right of return for products purchased from the Company.
The Company may on occasion allow a return under appropriate conditions to promote good business practices; however, such returns
have been and are expected to be minimal. Regardless of when payment is received from the customer, revenues are recognized in
accordance with the criteria for revenue recognition described above.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
– The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers
to make required payments. The allowances are calculated based on a detailed review of individual customer accounts, historical
rates and an estimation of the overall economic conditions affecting the Company’s customer base. The Company reviews a customer’s
credit history before extending credit. If the financial condition of its customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment
of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. The Company charges off uncollectible receivables when
all reasonable collection efforts have been taken. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $16,000 at December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Customer Deposits
– The Company
occasionally receives prepayments or deposits from customers for products they order or intend to order. In such cases the prepayment
or deposit is initially recorded as a liability (customer deposits) and is only recognized as revenue when the ordered products
are shipped and the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the customer.
Cost Recognition
– Cost of
revenues includes all direct material and labor costs and those indirect costs of bringing raw materials to sale condition, including
depreciation of equipment used in manufacturing and shipping and handling costs. Selling, general, and administrative costs are
charged to operating expenses as incurred. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and are included in operating
expenses. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. The Company had advertising expenses of $7,268 and $3,000 for 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
Long-Lived Assets
– The Company
evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable. When indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by
those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amount, the Company measures the amount of such impairment by comparing the
assets' carrying value to the assets' present value of the expected future discounted cash flows. Impairment charges, if any, are
recorded in the period realized.
Income Taxes
– Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of
assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable
to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established to reduce a
deferred tax asset to the amount expected to be realized. The Company assesses its ability to realize deferred tax assets based
on current earnings performance and on projections of future taxable income in the relevant tax jurisdictions. These projections
do not include taxable income from the reversal of deferred tax liabilities and do not reflect a general growth assumption but
do consider known or pending events, such as the passage of legislation. The Company’s estimates of future taxable income
are reviewed annually. All tax positions are first analyzed to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that it
is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation
processes. After the initial analysis, the tax benefit is measured as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being
realized upon ultimate settlement. Our income tax returns are subject to adjustment under audit for approximately the last four
years.
If the Company is required to pay interest
on the underpayment of income taxes, the Company recognizes interest expense in the first period the interest becomes due according
to the provisions of the relevant tax law.
If the Company is subject to payment of
penalties, the Company recognizes an expense for the amount of the statutory penalty in the period when the position is taken on
the income tax return. If the penalty was not recognized in the period when the position was initially taken, the expense is recognized
in the period when the Company changes its judgment about meeting minimum statutory thresholds related to the initial position
taken.
Stock-Based Compensation
–
All share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are expensed based on their estimated fair values
at grant date, in accordance with ASC 718.
Compensation expense for stock options
is recorded ratably over the vesting period using the estimated fair value on the date of grant, as calculated by the Company using
the Black-Scholes model. The Company classifies all share-based awards as equity instruments.
See NOTE 11 for a description of the Company’s
share-based compensation plan and information related to awards granted under the plan.
Net Loss Per Share
– Basic
net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares
of common stock outstanding during the period. The Company has other potentially dilutive securities outstanding that are not shown
in a diluted net loss per share calculation because their effect in both 2017 and 2016 would be anti-dilutive. The following chart
lists the securities as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 that were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share because
their effect would have been antidilutive:
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Options to purchase common stock
|
|
|
3,099,194
|
|
|
|
3,647,240
|
|
Warrants to purchase common stock
|
|
|
8,800,737
|
|
|
|
10,952,386
|
|
Shares issuable upon conversion of debt
|
|
|
3,097,353
|
|
|
|
4,377,948
|
|
Convertible preferred stock in AbTech
|
|
|
6,457,467
|
|
|
|
6,457,467
|
|
|
|
|
21,454,751
|
|
|
|
25,435,041
|
|
Conversion Options
– The Company
will bifurcate conversion options embedded in financial instruments and account for them at fair value if required. Currently,
the Company has determined that none of its embedded conversion options require bifurcation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “
Revenue from Contracts
with Customers (Topic 606)
,” which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The core principle
of ASU No. 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects
the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU No. 2014-09 defines a five step process
to achieve this core principle and in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process
than are required under existing GAAP. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08 which further clarifies the guidance on the
principal versus agent considerations within ASU No. 2014-09. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10 to expand the guidance
on identifying performance obligations and licensing within ASU No. 2014-09. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12 to improve
revenue recognition in the areas of collectability, presentation of sales tax and other similar taxes collected from customers,
noncash consideration, contract modifications and completed contracts at transition. This update also amends the disclosure requirements
within ASU No. 2014-09 for entities that retrospectively apply the guidance. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective
approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients,
or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU No. 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption.
The Company intends to use the cumulative effect approach in adopting the new standard. However, based on the Company’s historical
and current revenue transactions, the new standard is unlikely to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements until such time as the Company begins to generate material revenues through contracts with customers that are the subject
of ASU No. 2014-09.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No.
2016-01, “
Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities,”
which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial
instruments and affects all entities that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities. The update takes effect for public
entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is
currently evaluating the new standard and believes that it will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No.
2016-02, “
Leases (Topic 842),”
which, among other provisions, requires lessees to recognize lease assets and
lease liabilities for those leases classified as operating leases under previous GAAP. Under this new provision, a lessee should
recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset
representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years for public entities. The Company has various
operating leases and expects that these amendments will significantly affect the manner in which such operating leases are presented
in its consolidated financial statements. While the Company expects the amendment to have a minimal effect on the amount of operating
expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations, the amendment will result in the Company including on its balance
sheet a right to use asset and a corresponding liability for the lease payments due under operating leases in effect at the balance
sheet dates.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13,
“
Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,”
which replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses
and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The standard
will take effect for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company
is currently evaluating the new standard which will apply to the estimation of credit losses on the Company’s trade receivables,
but it is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s measurement of such credit losses.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No.
2016-15, “
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,”
which
addresses how eight specific cash flow issues should be presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments
in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
Early adoption is permitted and the amendments are to be applied using a retrospective transition method. The Company is currently
evaluating the new standard and its potential impact on the Company’s presentation of the relevant cash flow items in the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
In June 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09,
“Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting,”
which provides guidance
on which changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards require an entity to apply modification accounting in
ASC Topic 718. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and for interim periods within those
annual periods. Early adoption is allowed. The Company is currently evaluating the new standard, but it is not expected to have
a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN
These consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern. The
Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenue sufficient to cover its operating costs and has incurred net
losses since its inception. These losses, with the associated substantial accumulated deficit, are a direct result of the
Company’s product development activities, the costs of introducing its technologies to the market and pursuing market
acceptance and, more recently, substantial legal expenses. In addition, the Company has a working capital deficit of
approximately $11 million as of December 31, 2017, with approximately $9.5 million of debt and accrued interest that will
become due in 2018 or is due on demand. Realization of a major portion of the assets in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which in turn is dependent upon the Company’s ability to
meet its financing requirements and the success of its future operations. The Company operates in a new, developing industry
with a variety of competitors. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern. As a result, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm included an emphasis-of-matter
paragraph with respect to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, expressing uncertainty regarding the
Company’s assumption that it will continue as a going concern.
In order to continue as a going concern,
management believes the Company will need to generate additional revenue through sales growth in the short term, raise additional
capital to fund its operating losses and service its debt and resolve the legal matters described in NOTE 15 – CONTINGENCIES,
LITIGATION, CLAIMS AND ASSESSMENTS. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are described as follows:
Sales and Marketing
. Historically,
the Company has generated revenues by selling its products directly to end customers, through distributors in key geographic markets
and in recent years through alliances to penetrate key market segments such as municipal stormwater, federal facilities and industrial
process water. The Company, including AEWS, pursued contracts that would enable it to bring its stormwater expertise to bear in
all phases of rebuilding projects, including the design, installation and operation of water treatment systems. The Company signed
its first contract for such a project with the County of Nassau in October 2013. After more than a year of work on this project
which progressed slowly and was hampered by many delays, the contract was suspended by Nassau County in May 2015, following the
announcement of the federal investigation of a state senator, Dean Skelos, and his son Adam Skelos, who had acted as a consultant
to the Company. As a consequence of the negative publicity for the Company surrounding these events, the Company began to direct
a greater portion of its sales efforts towards non-stormwater applications of its products in commercial and industrial markets,
while continuing to support stormwater product sales through direct sales staff and through distributors in international markets.
The Company hired a team of seasoned sales professionals with extensive experience in industrial markets in order to help facilitate
sales growth. The Company has made strides to develop or refine products for these new markets intended to provide effective solutions
for the treatment of produced water in the mining and drilling (fracking) industries, filtration of process water used in industrial
applications and the filtration of heavy metals from water in a variety of applications. Management believes that these developments
show promise for future revenues through sales growth once the products and systems being developed for these markets are proven
and refined, although no assurance can be given that such future sales growth will occur.
Financing.
To date, the Company
has financed its operations primarily with loans from shareholders, private placement financings and sales revenue. During 2017,
the Company received $3,682,000 in cash advances from two of its major stockholders. Terms for these loans have not been formalized;
however, the Company has treated the loans as debt accruing interest at 10% per annum. While it is possible that such loans will
be converted into purchases of common stock of the Company, there is no assurance that such conversions will occur. The Company
expects to continue to finance its operations, as needed, with loans from shareholders, however, there is no assurance such loans
from these related parties will continue in the future or be sufficient to cover the costs of our operations.
Management believes that upon validation
of its water treatment solutions for the stormwater, industrial and commercial markets, and if economic conditions improve in the
Company’s target markets, sales revenue can grow significantly, which would enable the Company to reverse its negative cash
flow from operations and raise additional capital as needed to service debt and fund operations. However, there is no assurance
that the Company’s overall efforts will be successful. If the Company is unable to generate significant sales growth in the
near term and raise additional capital, there is a risk that the Company could default on debt maturing during 2018. There can
be no assurance that noteholders will grant additional maturity date extensions or waive any default provisions of our outstanding
notes or that we will be able to timely refinance or repay such notes. Further, the Company is currently in default on notes that
matured in April 2017; however, the Company is currently in discussions with the noteholder to extend the maturity date. There
can be no assurances that the noteholder will not elect to exercise his default remedies under the notes and the Company does not
currently have sufficient liquidity to repay the indebtedness. While the Company does not expect the noteholder to accelerate the
indebtedness, the noteholder may do so at any time, or may initiate foreclosure actions, or seek any other remedies permitted by
the terms of the notes and applicable law. Should the holders of the Company’s indebtedness seek to accelerate the indebtedness
upon an event of default, the Company could be required to discontinue or significantly reduce the scope of its operations if no
other means of financing its operations are or become available. Consequently, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that these consolidated financial statements are issued.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded
asset amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities or any other adjustment that might be necessary should the Company
be unable to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 3 – INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following at December 31, 2017 and
2016:
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
117,048
|
|
|
$
|
99,182
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
243,810
|
|
|
|
279,045
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
28,821
|
|
|
|
26,890
|
|
Reserve for obsolescence
|
|
|
(63,000
|
)
|
|
|
(63,000
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
326,679
|
|
|
$
|
342,117
|
|
NOTE 4 – FIXED ASSETS
Fixed assets consist of the following at December 31, 2017 and
2016:
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
$
|
130,500
|
|
|
$
|
135,804
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
41,428
|
|
|
|
62,630
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
383,717
|
|
|
|
270,534
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
22,548
|
|
|
|
31,830
|
|
Total cost
|
|
|
578,193
|
|
|
|
500,798
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(436,564
|
)
|
|
|
(456,392
|
)
|
Net book value
|
|
$
|
141,629
|
|
|
$
|
44,406
|
|
Depreciation expense charged to operations
during 2017 and 2016 was $16,148 and $11,489, respectively.
NOTE 5 – COMMITMENTS
Capital Leases
– In 2017,
the Company entered into a capital lease for the purchase of manufacturing equipment with a cost of $54,171. Depreciation expense
on this equipment was $3,157 in 2017, which was the balance of accumulated depreciation at December 31, 2017. The Company had no
other capital leases at December 31, 2017 or 2016. Minimum future lease payments and present values of the net minimum lease payments
for this capital lease are as follows:
Year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
15,793
|
|
2019
|
|
|
15,793
|
|
2020
|
|
|
15,793
|
|
2021
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
Total minimum lease payments due
|
|
|
52,643
|
|
Less: sales tax amounts
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net minimum lease payments
|
|
|
52,643
|
|
Less: imputed interest
|
|
|
6,380
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments
|
|
|
46,263
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
12,651
|
|
Capital lease obligation noncurrent portion
|
|
$
|
33,612
|
|
Operating Leases
– The Company
leases office and warehouse space, office equipment and an automobile under various noncancelable operating leases that extend
through October 2018. Total rental expense charged to operations during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, were $330,731
and $383,923, respectively. Because some of the Company’s leases contain escalating lease payments during their terms, the
Company recognizes rental expense for these leases as a straight-line amortization of the total lease expense to be paid over the
term of the leases. The difference between the amount of rent expensed and the amount of rent actually paid under the leases is
included in accrued expenses as deferred rent (see NOTE 8 – ACCRUED EXPENSES). Future annual minimum lease payments for the
next five years, under noncancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more, as of December 31, 2017,
are as follows:
Year
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Amount
|
|
$
|
162,866
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
162,866
|
|
Indemnification Agreements
-
The Company enters into indemnification provisions under its agreements with officers and directors and companies in its ordinary
course of business, typically with business partners, customers, landlords, lenders and lessors. Under these provisions the Company
generally indemnifies and holds harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result
of the Company’s activities or, in some cases, as a result of the indemnified party’s activities under the agreement.
The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is
unlimited. The Company has not incurred material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements.
As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities
recorded for these agreements as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Other Commitments
– The Company
has commitments for research and development activities with minimum future payments as follows:
Year
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Amount
|
|
$
|
158,078
|
|
|
$
|
62,118
|
|
|
$
|
12,118
|
|
|
$
|
12,118
|
|
|
$
|
12,118
|
|
|
$
|
1,010
|
|
|
$
|
257,560
|
|
NOTE 6 – LOANS FROM SHAREHOLDER
Loans from shareholder at December 31, 2017 and 2016
represents a $9,000 demand loan made by a prior Director of the Company to the Company’s subsidiary, ESC. This loan is unsecured
and non-interest bearing.
NOTE 7 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Accounts payable; related party
– At December 31, 2016, Accounts payable – related party represents amounts owed to executives of the Company for travel
expenses.
Related party loan
– Represents
amounts owed to a related company for services provided in the form of office and clerical support, and cash advances. On December
31, 1998, the Company executed a loan document in the amount of $127,353, with an original maturity date of December 31, 2003 (extended
to December 31, 2018), with interest accruing at the rate of 5% per annum until the loan is paid in full. The Company may repay
the note in part or in full at any time prior to maturity. In the event of default of principal or interest, the entire unpaid
balance, including principal and interest, will be due and payable without notice, with interest accruing at 8% from the date of
default. The outstanding balance on this loan was $65,102 and $71,949 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Cash Advances
– During 2017,
two investors considered to be related parties because they individually beneficially own greater than 5% of the Company’s
issued and outstanding common stock, made cash advances to the Company totaling $3,682,000, as short-term loans. During 2016, these
same related party investors made similar cash advances to the Company totaling $3,731,000. These cash advances are reported as
“Due to investor – related party” on the consolidated balance sheets. The specific terms of these loans have
not yet been determined. However, the Company is accruing interest on these loans at a rate of 10% per annum, which accrued interest
totaled approximately $709,000 and $146,000 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
NOTE 8 – ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses consist of the following at December 31, 2017
and 2016:
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Accrued payroll and commissions
|
|
$
|
46,852
|
|
|
$
|
37,176
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
7,291
|
|
|
|
34,847
|
|
Accrued vacation
|
|
|
61,285
|
|
|
|
55,025
|
|
Accrued director compensation
|
|
|
269,375
|
|
|
|
206,750
|
|
Accrued warranty reserve
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Other accruals
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
$
|
391,801
|
|
|
$
|
339,732
|
|
NOTE 9 – INCOME TAXES
There is no current or deferred tax expense
for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 due to the Company’s loss position and the full reserve taken on the Company’s
deferred tax asset in both years.
A reconciliation of statutory rates is
as follows at December 31, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Statutory rate
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
Reduction for valuation allowance related to net operating loss carry-forwards and change in permanent differences
|
|
|
-24.9
|
%
|
|
|
-37.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
The tax effects of temporary differences
that give rise to deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows at December 31, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
14,138,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,381,000
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(11,000
|
)
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(14,127,000
|
)
|
|
|
(20,396,000
|
)
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The change in the federal statutory tax
rate enacted in late 2017 resulted in a deferred tax asset reduction of approximately $6,269,000 during the year ended December
31, 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the net deferred tax benefit was approximately $1,494,000. At December 31, 2017
and 2016, the Company had federal loss carryforwards of approximately $58.5 million and $55.0 million, respectively, and state
loss carryforwards of approximately $30.5 million and $27.1 million, respectively, which may be available to reduce future taxes,
if any. The state net operating loss carryforwards expire starting in 2032 through 2037. The federal net operating loss carryforwards
expire starting in 2018 through 2037. The net change in the total valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2017 was
a net decrease of approximately $6,269,000 and for the year ended December 31, 2016, a net increase of $1,494,000. Based on the
Company’s loss position and the uncertainty of the amount and timing of future taxable income, management believes that it
is more likely than not that the Company will not fully realize the benefit of its net deferred tax assets. Pursuant to Internal
Revenue Code Section 382, annual utilization of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards may be limited if a cumulative
change in ownership of more than 50% is deemed to occur within any three-year period. Because the deferred tax asset is fully reserved,
the Company has not fully analyzed whether such limitation has occurred at this time. However, given the equity issuances in 2015,
it is likely that a section 382 limitation has been incurred.
NOTE 10 – PROMISSORY NOTES AND OTHER DEBT
Information regarding the various promissory
notes that were outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 is set forth in the table below:
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
Rate
|
|
Current promissory notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured note
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
4/15/16
(2)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Secured, convertible note
|
|
|
44,546
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
4/30/18
(1)
|
|
$
|
0.032
|
|
Unsecured, convertible note
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
4/15/16
(2)
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
Unsecured, convertible note
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
4/15/16
(2)
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
Total promissory notes
|
|
$
|
1,044,546
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
On October 21, 2016, the Company and the holder
of this note mutually agreed to amend the note by: (i) extending the maturity date from April 12, 2016 to October 31, 2017; (ii)
continuing the interest rate at 11.5% per annum through the new maturity date; (iii) obligating the Company to make monthly payments
on the note of $10,000 per month beginning in November 2016; and (iv) adding a conversion feature to the note that allows the
note holder to convert the unpaid balance due under the note into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate
of $0.032 per share.
|
On July 17, 2017, the Company
and the holder of this note mutually agreed to further amend the note by: (a) extending the maturity date from October 31, 2017
to November 15, 2017; (b) granting to the holder of the note a right to convert the entire outstanding unpaid balance of the note,
including any unpaid accrued interest thereon, into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of $0.015 per
share through November 15, 2017; and (c) tolling the Company’s obligation to make monthly payments on the note until after
November 15, 2017, at which time, the maturity date would be further extended and the Company would resume making payments of $10,000
per month until the note is paid in full.
On February 27, 2018, the
Company and the holder of this note mutually agreed to further amend the note by: (a) extending the maturity date from November
15, 2017 to April 30, 2018; and (b) further tolling the Company’s obligation to make monthly payments on the note until after
April 30, 2018, at which time, if the note has not been settled by conversion or otherwise, the maturity date will be further extended
and the Company will resume making payments of $10,000 per month until the note is paid in full.
|
(2)
|
In March 2017, the Company and the holder of these
notes mutually agreed to extend the maturity dates of these notes to April 30, 2017, thus curing the technical default of the
notes that had occurred on the prior maturity dates of May 11, 2016 for the secured note and April 15, 2016 for the unsecured
notes. As of December 31, 2017, these notes were once again in technical default. However, the note holder has not declared an
event of default. The Company is attempting to further extend the maturity dates on these notes. However, the Company gives no
assurance that an agreement to extend such maturity dates will be achieved.
|
The convertible promissory notes are convertible
into shares of the Company’s common stock at the indicated conversion rates. The secured notes have a security interest in
all of the personal property and other assets of the Company. The note discounts resulting from warrants issued with the notes
and any beneficial conversion features inherent in the convertible notes, were fully amortized prior to 2016.
Bank Line of Credit
The Company has a bank line of credit with
a credit limit of $100,000. This line of credit has an annual interest rate of prime plus 6.75% (11.25% as of December 31, 2017)
and requires monthly payment of any interest due plus approximately 1% of the outstanding balance. At December 31, 2017 and 2016,
the outstanding balance due on the bank line of credit was $65,625 and $82,870, respectively.
Due to Investors
The amount shown in the consolidated balance
sheets as due to investors represents short-term loans made to the Company by related party investors (see NOTE 7 – RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS –
Private Placements
). The terms of these loans have not yet been determined. However, the Company
is accruing interest on the outstanding balance of the loans at a rate of 10% per annum, which management believes will approximate
the final negotiated rate.
NOTE 11 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY AND STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
Stock Options
The Company grants stock options to officers,
directors, employees and consultants under stock plans.
AbTech’s 2007 Stock Plan
–
Prior to the Merger with ABHD, AbTech issued stock options under a plan (the “2007 Stock Plan”) that allowed up to
15% of the capital stock outstanding of AbTech to be available for awards granted under the plan. Options granted under the plan
expire on the earlier of the stated expiration date or, in the case of incentive stock options, ninety days after the date employment
ends or, in the case of non-statutory options, 30 days after the optionee ceases to be a service provider to the Company. The stated
expiration dates occur between 2018 and 2020. Stock options were granted at the fair market value of the common stock as determined
by the Board of Directors on the date of grant and are exercisable subject to vesting provisions and performance objectives. All
stock options granted by AbTech outstanding as of the date of the reverse acquisition transaction with ABHD automatically converted
into options for the purchase of shares of ABHD common stock at the rate of 5.32 shares of ABHD stock for each share of AbTech
stock. Upon the exercise of any of these AbTech stock options, ABHD will issue new authorized shares of its common stock.
ABHD’s 2012 Incentive Stock Plan
– In May 2012, the shareholders of ABHD approved the 2012 Incentive Stock Plan (the “2012 Plan”), which allows
for up to 9,000,000 shares of common stock awards to be granted during the term of the plan. The exercise price of options granted
under the 2012 Plan is determined by the 2012 Plan Committee and may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common
stock of ABHD on the grant date. Options expire not more than 10 years from the date of grant.
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and
2016, compensation expense of $18,000 and $22,704, respectively, for stock options accounted for under ASC 718, is included in
Selling, general and administrative
expense in the consolidated statements of operations. There was no related tax benefit
recognized due to the Company’s loss position. At December 31, 2017, the Company had approximately $4,500 of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to unvested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of less
than one year. During 2017 and 2016, no stock options were exercised.
Compensation expense is determined from
the estimates of fair values of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. There were no options granted
in 2017 or 2016.
The Company’s stock option activity
for the years ending December 31, 2017 and 2016 is summarized below (all share amounts for options granted by AbTech have been
restated to give effect to the merger exchange ratio and reflect the equivalent number of ABHD shares):
AbTech Options
|
|
Number of
AbTech Shares
Under Option
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining Term
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
755,977
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Expired or forfeited
|
|
|
(239,570
|
)
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
516,407
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Expired or forfeited
|
|
|
(346,046
|
)
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
170,361
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
As of December 31, 2017, there were 170,361
stock options outstanding and exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $0.70, a weighted average remaining life of
2.8 years and an intrinsic value of zero.
ABHD Options
|
|
Number of
ABHD Shares
Under Option
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining Term
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
4,620,833
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Expired or forfeited
|
|
|
(1,490,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
3,130,833
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Expired or forfeited
|
|
|
(202,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
2,928,833
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
As of December 31, 2017, the 2,928,833
stock options outstanding had an intrinsic value of zero. As of December 31, 2017, there were approximately 2,913,833 stock options
exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $0.48, a weighted average remaining life of 3.5 years and an intrinsic value
of zero. The 15,000 non-exercisable stock options outstanding at December 31, 2017, vest over time in 2018.
The following table summarizes the activity
of the shares and weighted-average grant date fair value of the Company’s non-vested common stock options during the years
ending December 31, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
Non-vested ABHD Shares
|
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
grant date
fair value
|
|
Non-Vested at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(75,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
Expired or forfeited
|
|
|
(95,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
Non-Vested at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(60,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
Expired or forfeited
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
Non-Vested at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Common stock
During 2017 and 2016, the Company issued
no new shares of common stock.
Warrants
There were no warrants issued by the Company
in 2017. During 2016, the Company exercised the second maturity date extension options on two of the promissory notes issued in
2014, resulting in the number of warrant shares for the corresponding warrants issued with the promissory notes increasing by 17,500
shares. The value of these warrants was negligible due to the high exercise price of the warrants relative to the fair market price
of ABHD shares on the date the warrant shares were issued.
A summary of warrants to purchase common
stock outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
|
|
AbTech Warrants
|
|
|
ABHD Warrants
|
|
|
|
Number of
Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Number of
Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
141,969
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
13,532,842
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(141,969
|
)
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
(2,597,956
|
)
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,952,386
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,151,649
|
)
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,800,737
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
The 8,800,737 exercisable ABHD warrants
outstanding at December 31, 2017 expire at various dates through 2020 and have a weighted average remaining life of 1.6 years.
AbTech Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock
AbTech has designated 3,500,000 of its
5,000,000 authorized preferred shares as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Stock”) and has 1,212,947
of such shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017. These shares represent the non-controlling interest in the Company’s
subsidiary as shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations. Series A Stock has a par value
of $0.01 and no liquidation or dividend preferences.
The holders of Series A Stock may at any
time elect to convert any or all such shares into common shares of AbTech at a conversion rate initially set at one share of AbTech
common stock for each share of Series A Stock, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments that protect Series A Stockholders
if AbTech issues new shares at less than $3.75 per share. The Series A Stock will automatically convert into common shares upon
either (a) the closing of a firm underwritten public offering, (b) subsequent listing on the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ
Global Market, or (c) upon the sale or transfer of substantially all the assets or the consolidation or merger with an entity solely
for cash or solely for cash and securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ Global Market. While Series A Stockholders
have no voting rights as ABHD stockholders, they do have specific rights pertaining to the governance of AbTech, ABHD’s subsidiary.
Common shares reserved for future issuance
ABHD common shares reserved for future
issuance were as follows as of December 31 (all shares are stated in ABHD share equivalents):
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Options to purchase common stock
|
|
|
3,099,194
|
|
|
|
3,647,240
|
|
Warrants to purchase common stock
|
|
|
8,800,737
|
|
|
|
10,952,386
|
|
Shares issuable upon conversion of debt
|
|
|
3,097,353
|
|
|
|
4,377,948
|
|
Convertible preferred stock in AbTech
|
|
|
6,457,467
|
|
|
|
6,457,467
|
|
|
|
|
21,454,751
|
|
|
|
25,435,041
|
|
NOTE 12 – PRIVATE PLACEMENTS
The Company did not complete any private
placements during 2017 or 2016. However, during 2017 and 2016 the Company received short-term funding of $3,682,000 and $3,731,000,
respectively, from two related party investors. The Company and the related party investors are currently working out the terms
for these funded amounts (see NOTE 10 – PROMISSORY NOTES AND OTHER DEBT – Due to Investors).
NOTE 13 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
The Company’s financial instruments
consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, capital leases, due to investors,
bank line of credit, notes payable and convertible notes payable. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed
to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The fair value of these financial instruments
approximates their carrying values, using level 3 inputs, based on their short maturities, or for long-term debt, based on borrowing
rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms and maturities. Gains and losses recognized on changes in
fair value of financial instruments, if any, are reported in other income (expense) as gain (loss) on change in fair value. At
December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had no financial instruments outstanding that were estimated using level 1, level 2 or
level 3 inputs, other than discussed above.
NOTE 14 – CONTINGENCIES, LITIGATION, CLAIMS AND
ASSESSMENTS
On May 28, 2015, the Company received a
subpoena from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that stated that the staff of the SEC is conducting
an investigation
In the Matter of Abtech Holdings, Inc. (NY-9262)
. Generally, the SEC’s subpoena asked
for all documents, agreements, and communications concerning (i) the Company’s Contract for Services with Nassau County,
New York, dated October 8, 2013; (ii) Dean Skelos, his son, Adam Skelos, who acted as a consultant to the Company, and their related
entities; (iii) SLC Clean Water, LLC, Axiom, Glenwood Management, and a number of other listed individuals and entities; (iv) certain
Board and Board committee minutes and related materials; (v) certain policies, procedures, and internal controls in effect at the
Company; (vi) certain communications with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, transfer agent, potential
and current investors, broker-dealers, investment advisors, and finders; and (vii) certain other organizational and financial account
information of the Company. The Company has provided a substantial number of documents in response to the SEC subpoena.
In 2016 and 2017, the SEC issued additional subpoenas pertaining to this investigation to two officers, a director, a prior director,
a prior employee of the Company, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and several law firms who have
counseled the Company from 2013 to the present.
The Company believes the SEC’s subpoenas
are a result of the complaint announced on May 4, 2015 that was filed by federal authorities against Dean and Adam Skelos. That
trial came to an end in December 2015 when both men were convicted of eight counts each, including fraud, bribery and extortion
of three separate companies – one of which was the Company. The Company cooperated fully with the United States Attorney’s
Office for the Southern District of New York throughout the Skelos investigation and trial, by providing subpoenaed documents and
other evidence and having the Company’s president and CEO testify on behalf of the government at the trial. In September
2017, a federal appeals panel overturned the 2015 corruption convictions of Dean Skelos and Adam Skelos. The Company is uncertain
at this point if it will have any further involvement in this matter.
The investigation by the SEC is ongoing
and no resolution can be predicted at this time. We have not yet recorded a liability related to the cost of resolving this matter
although we have incurred and recognized material compliance costs to date. At this time, no estimate of the possible loss or range
of loss can be made. In the meantime, we are continuing to incur significant legal fees for compliance with the SEC subpoenas.
In May 2016, the Company, AEWS and AbTech
received letters from the New York State Joint Commission on Public Ethics (“JCOPE”) asking for a written response
to allegations constituting potential violations of lobbying laws in the state of New York. The Company’s legal counsel provided
a written response to JCOPE on May 31, 2016, wherein they presented the Company’s position that it has consistently complied
with all applicable lobbying laws. On August 15, 2016, JCOPE issued notices to the Company, AbTech and AEWS that JCOPE had decided
to commence an investigation to determine whether a substantial basis exists to conclude that the Company violated lobbying laws
in the state of New York. The Company intends to defend its position that it has consistently complied with all applicable lobbying
laws and is working with JCOPE to resolve this matter. However, it is not clear at this time how the matter will ultimately be
resolved.
In accordance with the stockholder proposal
approved by the Company’s stockholders at the May 13, 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Stockholder Proposal”),
the Company engaged legal counsel to assess whether the Company should pursue legal action to recover financial losses and damages
pertaining to the United States vs. Dean Skelos and Adam Skelos case. The Company, through its legal counsel, is currently in discussions
with one entity regarding damages claimed by the Company. However, it cannot be determined at this time how this matter will ultimately
be resolved.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company had
incurred approximately $3,490,000 in legal fees and other costs related to the matters described above, including approximately
$1,431,000 incurred during 2017. The Company cannot estimate at this time the cost of additional legal representation in resolving
the SEC investigation, the JCOPE investigation or pursuing legal action pursuant to the Stockholder Proposal.
The Company has filed a claim for coverage
for some of these legal fees under a liability insurance policy. The insurer denied the claim and the Company engaged legal counsel
to dispute the insurer’s denial of the claim. After an unsuccessful attempt to resolve the dispute through mediation, the
Company filed a formal complaint against the insurer on July 11, 2016, in the United States District Court for the Southern District
of New York. In December 2016, the insurer remitted a payment to the Company of $465,187 for a portion of the claim that the insurer
determined to be covered by the policy. During 2017, the insurer remitted additional payments totaling $1,138,984 to the Company,
or directly to the applicable law firms, for legal fees related to these matters. The payments made by the insurer were offset
against other selling, general and administrative operating expenses in the periods in which such payments were received. The ultimate
outcome of the litigation with the insurer cannot be determined at this time.
NOTE 15 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the Company
received additional short-term funding of $785,000 from two investors considered to be a related party because they individually
have a beneficial ownership interest in the Company of greater than 5%, bringing the total due to investors for these short-term
loans in 2016, 2017 and 2018 to $8,198,000. The Company and the related party investors are currently working out the terms for
these funded amounts (see NOTE 10 – PROMISSORY NOTES AND OTHER DEBT – Due to Investors).
In February 2018, the Company amended a
secured, convertible promissory note with an unpaid principal amount of $44,546, which was outstanding and in technical default
as of December 31, 2017, by extending its maturity date as described in NOTE 10 – PROMISSORY NOTES AND OTHER DEBT. Accordingly,
this note was not in technical default as of the filing date.
In March 2018, a holder of AbTech preferred
stock converted 600,000 of such preferred shares into 600,000 shares of AbTech common stock and then converted these AbTech common
shares into 3,194,270 shares of ABHD common stock in accordance with the terms of the Merger between AbTech and ABHD. This conversion
reduced the number of AbTech preferred shares outstanding to 612,947 and reduced the minority interest of preferred shareholders
in AbTech Industries from approximately 15.3% to 8.5%.
NOTE 16 – QUARTERLY FINANCIAL
DATA (UNAUDITED)
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
106,562
|
|
|
$
|
88,048
|
|
|
$
|
311,952
|
|
|
$
|
66,545
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
(2,655
|
)
|
|
|
(672
|
)
|
|
|
154,227
|
|
|
|
(43,213
|
)
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(1,570,379
|
)
|
|
|
(246,480
|
)
|
|
|
(807,247
|
)
|
|
|
(1,031,928
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(1,699,682
|
)
|
|
|
(400,722
|
)
|
|
|
(988,441
|
)
|
|
|
(1,235,163
|
)
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
501,678,288
|
|
|
|
501,678,288
|
|
|
|
501,678,288
|
|
|
|
501,678,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
42,637
|
|
|
$
|
64,027
|
|
|
$
|
53,730
|
|
|
$
|
149,562
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
(34,721
|
)
|
|
|
(24,394
|
)
|
|
|
(35,080
|
)
|
|
|
43,257
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(1,458,897
|
)
|
|
|
(1,366,467
|
)
|
|
|
(1,157,027
|
)
|
|
|
(605,105
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(1,483,555
|
)
|
|
|
(1,414,618
|
)
|
|
|
(1,230,311
|
)
|
|
|
(711,772
|
)
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
501,678,288
|
|
|
|
501,678,288
|
|
|
|
501,678,288
|
|
|
|
501,678,288
|
|