SHLDQ Sears Holdings Corporation (CE)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒             Filed by a party other than the Registrant   o

Check the appropriate box:

SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

   
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

March 29, 2018
Dear Stockholder:

I am pleased to invite you to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of Sears Holdings Corporation (the “Company” or “Sears Holdings”) on Wednesday, May 9, 2018. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. (Central time) in the Sears Holdings General Session Room, 3333 Beverly Road, Hoffman Estates, Illinois.

We are pleased to furnish proxy materials to our stockholders over the Internet. We believe that this e-proxy process expedites stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials, while also lowering the costs and reducing the environmental impact of our annual meeting.

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person, please read the proxy statement and vote your shares. Instructions for Internet and telephone voting are included in your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card (if you receive your materials by mail).

Sincerely,
 

Edward S. Lampert
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Sears Holdings Corporation
3333 Beverly Road
Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60179

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS  

Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials to each stockholder of record, we are furnishing proxy materials by providing access to such documents on the Internet. Most stockholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) is being sent to most of our stockholders

commencing on or about March 29, 2018, which will instruct you as to how you may access and review all of the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice also instructs you as to how you may submit your proxy on the Internet. If you would like to receive a paper or email copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice.

What is included in the proxy materials? What is a proxy statement and what is a proxy?

The proxy materials for the Sears Holdings 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) include the Notice of Annual Meeting, this proxy statement and our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K. If you received a paper copy of these materials, the proxy materials also include a proxy card or voting instruction form.

A proxy statement is a document that SEC regulations require us to give you when we ask you to sign a proxy designating individuals to vote on your behalf. A proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote the stock you own. That other person is called a proxy.

If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document also is called a proxy or a proxy card. We have designated three of our officers as proxies for the Annual Meeting. These officers are Robert A. Riecker, Stephen L. Sitley and Luke J. Valentino.

The form of proxy and this proxy statement have been approved by the Board of Directors and are being provided to stockholders by its authority.

What am I voting on at the Annual Meeting?

At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders are asked to:

What does it mean to vote by proxy?

It means that you give someone else the right to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. In this way, you ensure that your vote will be counted even if you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting. If you give your proxy but do not include specific instructions on how to vote, the individuals named as proxies will vote your shares as follows:

Who is entitled to vote?

Only holders of our common stock at the close of business on March 12, 2018 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each outstanding share of common stock is entitled to one vote. There were 107,957,910 shares of common stock outstanding on the Record Date.

How do I cast my vote?

If you hold your shares directly in your own name, you are a “registered stockholder” and can vote in person at the Annual Meeting or you can complete and submit a proxy through the Internet, by telephone or by mail (if you received a proxy card by mail). If your shares are registered in the

name of a broker or other nominee, you are a “street-name stockholder” and will receive instructions from your broker or other nominee describing how to vote your shares.

How do I vote by telephone or through the Internet?

If you are a registered stockholder, you may vote by telephone or through the Internet following the instructions on the Notice or proxy card. If you are a street-name stockholder, your broker or other nominee has provided information for you to use in directing your broker or nominee how to vote your shares.

Who will count the vote?

A representative of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., an independent tabulator, will count the vote and act as the inspector of election.

Can I change my vote after I have voted?

A subsequent vote by any means will change your prior vote. For example, if you voted by telephone, a subsequent Internet vote will change your vote. If you are a registered stockholder and wish to change your vote by mail, you may do so by requesting, in writing, a proxy card from the Corporate Secretary at Sears Holdings Corporation, Law Department,

3333 Beverly Road, Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60179, Attn: Corporate Secretary. The last vote received prior to the meeting will be the one counted. If you are a registered stockholder, you may also change your vote by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

Can I revoke a proxy?

Yes, registered stockholders may revoke a properly executed proxy at any time before it is exercised by submitting a letter addressed to and received by the Corporate Secretary at the address listed in the answer to the previous question. Street-name stockholders cannot revoke their proxies in person at the Annual Meeting because the actual registered

stockholders, the brokers or other nominees, will not be present. Street-name stockholders wishing to change their votes after returning voting instructions to their broker or other nominee should contact the broker or nominee directly.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice, proxy or voting instruction card?

It means your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. For all Notices you receive, please enter your vote by Internet for each control number you have been assigned. If you received paper copies of proxy materials, please provide voting instructions for all proxy and voting instruction cards you receive. We encourage you to register all your accounts in the same name and address. Registered stockholders

may contact our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, at 1-800-732-7780, www.computershare.com/investor or by mail at Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 30170, College Station, Texas 77842-3170. Street-name stockholders holding shares through a broker or other nominee should contact their broker or nominee and request consolidation of their accounts.

What shares are included on my Notice?

Your Notice includes all shares registered to your account in the same social security number and address, including any full and fractional shares you own under one or more of the following plans:

We refer to the Sears Holdings Savings Plan and the Sears Holdings Puerto Rico Savings Plan, collectively, as the “Savings Plans.”

How do I vote if I hold my shares through the Savings Plans?

If you participate in a Savings Plan (US or Puerto Rico) and have a balance in the SHLD Stock Fund, you may direct the trustee how to vote the number of shares of common stock credited to your account through the Internet, by telephone, or by U.S. mail. Your direction will be held in confidence by the trustee of the relevant Savings Plan. If you do not direct the vote of shares credited to your account in a Savings Plan (or you submit your proxy card with an unclear voting designation or with no voting designation at all), then the trustee of the relevant Savings Plan will vote the shares in your account in proportion to the way other participants in the

Savings Plans vote their shares, unless contrary to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. To allow sufficient time for the trustees of the Savings Plans to tabulate the vote of the Savings Plan shares, you must vote through the Internet, by telephone or return your proxy card so that it is received by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 7, 2018. Because shares of common stock held in the Savings Plans are registered in the name of the Savings Plan trustee, participants in the Company’s Savings Plans cannot vote Savings Plan shares or revoke prior voting instructions in person at the Annual Meeting.

What makes a quorum?

Each outstanding share of our common stock as of the Record Date is entitled to one vote at the Annual Meeting. A majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, being present or represented by proxy at the meeting, constitutes a quorum. A quorum is necessary to conduct the Annual Meeting.

How many votes are needed to approve each of the proposals?

How are votes counted?

Under Delaware law and our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated By-Laws, all votes entitled to be cast by stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter, whether those stockholders vote “for,” “against” or abstain from voting, will be counted for purposes of determining the minimum number of affirmative votes required to (1) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, (2) ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm and (3) approve the

stockholder proposal regarding an independent Chair of the Board of Directors, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting. With regard to the election of directors, votes may be cast in favor or withheld; votes cast in favor of a nominee will be counted for purposes of determining the nominees who will be elected; votes that are withheld will be excluded and will have no effect. However, the Board of Directors and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider a substantial number of withheld votes in future decisions regarding director nominees.

What is the effect of an abstention?

Abstentions occur when stockholders are considered present at the Annual Meeting, but fail to vote. The shares of a stockholder who abstains from voting on a matter will be counted for purposes of determining

whether a quorum is present at the meeting so long as the stockholder is present in person or represented by proxy. Abstentions may be specified on all proposals (other than the election of directors). An abstention from

voting on a matter by a stockholder present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting has the same legal effect as a vote “against” the proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, the proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte

& Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm and the stockholder proposal regarding an independent Chair of the Board of Directors, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

How will votes be counted on shares held through brokers?

If you hold shares beneficially in street name and do not provide your broker with voting instructions, your shares may constitute “broker non-votes” with respect to certain proposals. Generally, broker non-votes occur on a matter when a broker is not permitted to vote on that matter without instructions from the beneficial owner and instructions are not given. Brokers are not entitled to vote on the election of directors, the advisory proposal to approve the compensation of our named executive officers or the stockholder proposal regarding an independent Chair of the Board of Directors, unless they receive voting instructions from the

beneficial owner. The shares of a stockholder whose shares are not voted because of a broker non-vote on a particular matter will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the meeting so long as the stockholder is represented by proxy. In tabulating the voting result for any particular proposal, shares that constitute broker non-votes are not considered votes cast on that proposal. Thus, broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of any matter being voted on at the meeting, assuming that a quorum is obtained.

Who may attend the Annual Meeting?

Any stockholder as of the Record Date may attend. Seating and parking are limited and admission is on a first-come basis. Registration will begin at 8:30 a.m. and seating will begin at 8:45 a.m.

An admission ticket (or other proof of stock ownership) and some form of government-issued photo identification (such as a valid driver’s license or passport) will be required for admission to the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders who own Sears Holdings common stock as of the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to attend the meeting. An admission ticket will serve as verification of your ownership. If you received

a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and will not be requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials, please bring that Notice with you as your admission ticket. If you are a registered stockholder and you received printed copies of your proxy materials by mail, an admission ticket is attached to your proxy card. If you are a street-name stockholder, you will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement, proxy or letter from the broker or other nominee confirming ownership of Sears Holdings shares as of the Record Date. You may also contact your bank or broker to obtain a written legal proxy. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the meeting.

Can I access future annual meeting materials through the Internet rather than receiving them by mail?

Yes. Registered stockholders can sign up for electronic delivery at www.proxyvote.com. If you vote through the Internet, you can also sign up for electronic delivery. Just follow the instructions that appear after you finish voting. You will receive an e-mail next year containing our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting. Street-name stockholders may also have the opportunity to

receive copies of these documents electronically. Please check the information provided in the proxy materials mailed to you by your broker or other nominee regarding the availability of this service. This procedure reduces the printing costs and fees the Company incurs in connection with the solicitation of proxies.

What is “householding”?

Sears Holdings has adopted a procedure called “householding,” which has been approved by the SEC. Under this procedure, stockholders of record who have the same address and do not receive proxy materials electronically will receive a single Notice or set of proxy materials, unless one or more of these stockholders notifies the Company that they wish to continue receiving individual copies. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. This procedure can result in significant savings to the Company by reducing printing and postage costs.

If you participate in householding and wish to receive a separate Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or set of proxy materials, or if you wish to receive separate copies of future Notices, annual reports and proxy

statements, please call 1-800-542-1061 or write to: Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. The Company will deliver the requested documents to you promptly upon your request.

Any stockholders of record who share the same address and currently receive multiple copies of proxy materials who wish to receive only one copy of these materials per household in the future may contact Broadridge Financial Solutions at the address or telephone number listed above. If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, please contact your broker, bank, or other nominee to request information about householding.

How do I revoke my consent to the householding program?

If you are a holder of record and share an address and last name with one or more other holders of record, and you wish to continue to receive separate annual reports, proxy statements and other disclosure documents, you may revoke your consent by writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. You may also revoke your consent by contacting Sears Holdings’ householding agent by calling toll free at 1-800-542-1061 and following the voice prompts. You will be removed from the householding program within 30 days of receipt of the revocation of your consent.

A number of brokerage firms have instituted householding. If you hold your shares in street-name, please contact your bank, broker or other holder of record to request information about householding.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Corporate Governance Practices

Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) is committed to effective corporate governance. The Board has approved and adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that provide the framework for governance of the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and assesses the Corporate Governance Guidelines annually and recommends changes to the Board as appropriate. The Corporate Governance Guidelines, along with the charters of Board committees, our Code of Conduct and our Board of Directors Code of Conduct are available on our website at www.searsholdings.com under the heading “Investors—Corporate Governance.”

Among other things, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that:

Director Independence

Based on the review and recommendation by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board analyzed the independence of each director. In making its independence determinations, the Board considers transactions, relationships and arrangements between Sears Holdings and entities with which members of the Board of Directors are associated as executive officers, directors and trustees. When these transactions, relationships and arrangements exist, they are in the ordinary course of business and are of a type customary for a retail company such as Sears Holdings.

As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that the following current and former directors met the standards of independence under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the applicable NASDAQ listing rules and other applicable laws and regulations, including that each member is or was free of any relationship that would interfere with his or her individual exercise of independent judgment:

Cesar L. Alvarez
Bruce R. Berkowitz
Paul G. DePodesta
William C. Kunkler III
Ann N. Reese
Thomas J. Tisch

In determining that Cesar L. Alvarez, a former director of the Company, met the applicable independence standards, the Board considered his relationship with affiliates of Fairholme Capital Management, LLC, a significant stockholder, and the annual amounts paid by Sears Holdings to the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, where he serves as co-chairman.

In determining that Bruce R. Berkowitz, a former director of the Company, met the applicable independence standards, the Board considered his relationship with affiliates of Fairholme Capital Management, LLC, a significant stockholder.

The Board has also determined that all members of the Audit Committee meet additional, heightened independence criteria applicable to audit committee members under the NASDAQ listing rules and rules promulgated pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Board has further determined that Ann N. Reese, the chair of the Audit Committee, and William C. Kunkler, III are “audit committee financial experts,” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.

The Board has also determined that all members of the Compensation Committee meet independence criteria applicable to compensation committee members under the NASDAQ listing rules.

Item 1 is the election to our Board of the six nominees named in this proxy statement. If elected, the six nominees named in this proxy statement will hold office until the next annual meeting or until their successors are elected and qualified. The persons named in the proxy card (the “proxies”) will vote FOR the election of all of the nominees listed below, unless otherwise instructed.

The number of Directors constituting the entire Board is currently fixed at six. Accordingly, the proxies may not vote for the election of more than six nominees for Director at the Annual Meeting.

The Board expects all nominees to be available for election. If any nominee should become unavailable to serve as a director for any reason prior to the Annual Meeting, the Board may substitute another person as a nominee. In that case, the proxies will vote your shares for that other person.

The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” election of the six nominees for director named in this proxy statement.

The biographies of each of the nominees below contain information regarding the person’s service as a director, business experience, public company director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, information regarding involvement in certain legal or administrative proceedings, if applicable, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board to determine that the person should serve as a director for the Company.

Paul G. DePodesta

Director since 2012

Paul G. DePodesta, 45, is Chief Strategy Officer for the Cleveland Browns football team, and has served in that position since January 2016. From November 2010 until January 2016, he served as Vice President, Player Development & Amateur Scouting for the New York Mets major league baseball club. From November 2008 until November 2010, he served as Executive Vice President for the San Diego Padres major league baseball club. From July 2006 until November 2008, he served as Special Assistant for Baseball Operations with the San Diego Padres. For nine years prior to joining the San Diego Padres, Mr. DePodesta worked in a variety of positions with other major league baseball clubs, including time as the Executive Vice President and General Manager for the Los Angeles Dodgers major league baseball club. Mr. DePodesta brings to the Board extensive experience as a leader and manager, including expertise in evaluating, procuring and developing talent and in creating and using processes and systems to evaluate individuals, teams and organizations.

Kunal S. Kamlani

Director since 2014

Kunal S. Kamlani, 45, is President, ESL Investments, Inc., a hedge fund, and has served in this position since March 2016. Prior to ESL, he was Chief Executive Officer of CASP Advisors, an independent advisory firm founded in 2015, which focuses on brand extension strategies, infrastructure development and mergers & acquisitions in the global cruise industry. Mr. Kamlani previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Prestige Cruise Holdings, the parent company of Oceania Cruises and Regent Seven Seas Cruises, from August 2011 until December 2014, prior to which he served as its chief financial officer from August 2009 to March 2010. From March 2010 to May 2011 he served as head of the Global Investment Solutions division of Bank of America/Merrill Lynch. Mr. Kamlani also served as Managing Director and Chief Operating

Officer of Smith Barney from October 2006 until June 2009. Mr. Kamlani served on the board of directors of Staples Inc. from June 2015 until September 2017, when that company was sold in a going private transaction. Mr. Kamlani brings to the Board extensive experience in corporate finance, operational excellence and organizational leadership.

William C. Kunkler, III

Director since 2009

William C. Kunkler, III, 61, is the Executive Vice President of Operations of CC Industries, Inc., an affiliate of Henry Crown and Company, and has served in that position, as well as other officer positions, since 1994. CC Industries, Inc. is a private equity firm focused on manufacturing companies and real estate investments. Mr. Kunkler has extensive manufacturing company experience and a thorough understanding of business operations, including finance and accounting principles and functions as well as operational methodologies, garnered from his experience as an executive officer and director of various companies. He also has strong ties to the Chicago area, the location of Sears Holdings’ corporate headquarters.

Edward S. Lampert

Director since 2005

Edward S. Lampert, 55, is Chairman of our Board of Directors, and our Chief Executive Officer. He is also the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ESL Investments, Inc., which he founded in April 1988. Since July 2015, Mr. Lampert has served as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Seritage Growth Properties. Mr. Lampert has extensive experience in business and finance, and he has invested in many retail companies. He also served as Chairman of the Board of Kmart Holding Corporation, a company that emerged from bankruptcy in 2003 and was transformed into a profitable business prior to its merger with Sears, Roebuck and Co. in 2005.

Ann N. Reese

Director since 2005

Ann N. Reese, 65, founded the Center for Adoption Policy in New York in 2001 and serves as its Co-Executive Director. Prior to founding the Center, Ms. Reese served as a Principal with Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, a private equity investment firm, in 1999 and 2000. From 1995 to 1998, she was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ITT Corporation, a hotel and gaming company. Ms. Reese is a director of Xerox Corporation and Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and a trustee of the University of Pennsylvania. Ms. Reese has extensive executive experience in corporate finance, financial reporting and strategic planning through her position as a public company chief financial officer as well as corporate governance expertise gained from her experience on other public company boards. Ms. Reese also served as a director of Kmart Holding Corporation, a company that emerged from bankruptcy in 2003 and was transformed into a profitable business prior to its merger with Sears, Roebuck and Co. in 2005.

Thomas J. Tisch

Director since 2005

Thomas J. Tisch, 63, has served as the Managing Partner of Four Partners, a private investment firm, since 1992. He has served as the Chancellor of Brown University since July 2007, and he is also a trustee of New York University Medical Center. Mr. Tisch served as a director of Synageva BioPharma Corp. from June 2012 until its acquisition by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in June 2015. Mr. Tisch brings financial and general business expertise to the Board from his position at a private investment firm. Mr. Tisch also served as a director of Kmart Holding Corporation, a company that emerged from bankruptcy in 2003 and was transformed into a profitable business prior to its merger with Sears, Roebuck and Co. in 2005.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board is responsible for reviewing the qualifications and independence of members of the Board and its various committees on a periodic basis, as well as the composition of the Board as a whole. This assessment includes members’ qualifications as independent and their economic interest in the Company through meaningful share ownership, as well as considerations of diversity, skills and experience in relation to the needs of the Board. Director nominees will be recommended to the Board by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in accordance with the policies and principles in its charter. While the Committee has the ability to retain a third party to assist in the nomination process, the Company did not pay a fee to any third party to identify or assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees in fiscal year 2017. The ultimate responsibility for selection of director nominees resides with the Board. The Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee believe that each nominee has the relevant

experience, personal and professional integrity, ability to make independent, analytical inquiries, experience with and understanding of the Company’s business and business environment, and willingness and ability to devote adequate time to Board and relevant committee duties.

While the Company does not have a formal diversity policy, as mentioned above, the Board considers diversity in identifying director nominees. The Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee believe that it is important that our directors represent diverse viewpoints. In addition to diversity of experience, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks director candidates with a broad diversity of professions, skills and backgrounds.

The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. Stockholders can nominate a candidate for election to the Board by complying with the nomination procedures in our By-Laws. For an election to be held at an annual meeting of stockholders, nomination by a stockholder must be made by notice in writing delivered to the Corporate Secretary not later than 90 days in advance of such meeting. However, if the annual meeting is not held on or within eight days of the fourth Tuesday in May of a year, and if the Company provides stockholders with less than 100 days’ notice or public disclosure of the meeting date, the stockholder notice must be given not later than the 10th day following the notice or public disclosure of the meeting date.

A stockholder’s notice to the Corporate Secretary must be in writing and be delivered to Sears Holdings Corporation, Law Department, 3333 Beverly Road, Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60179, Attn: Corporate Secretary. Currently, the By-Laws require that the notice include the following:

The chairman of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person not made in compliance with the procedures in the By-Laws. A stockholder’s compliance with procedures in the By-Laws will not require the Company to include information regarding a proposed nominee in the Company’s proxy solicitation materials.

The Board met 15 times during fiscal year 2017 (the fiscal year ended February 3, 2018). All of the then-serving directors attended at least 80% of the aggregate meetings of the Board and committees on which they then served. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors are expected to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All directors who stood for election at the 2017 annual meeting attended that meeting.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board has Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees in accordance with the NASDAQ listing rules. All members of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are independent, as defined in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the applicable NASDAQ listing rules and other applicable laws and regulations.

The table below reflects the current membership of each committee and the number of meetings held by each committee in fiscal year 2017.

Each committee operates under a written charter, each of which is reviewed and assessed at least annually. The charters are available on the Corporate Governance section of our corporate website, www.searsholdings.com. The principal functions of each committee are summarized below:

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee has a Related Party Transactions Subcommittee (the “RPT Subcommittee”) to assist the Audit Committee by reviewing potential related party transactions; material amendments to, or modifications, terminations or extensions of, agreements involving related party transactions; and the Company’s guidelines and policies with regard to related party transactions generally. The RPT Subcommittee may approve or pre-approve certain types of related party transactions (and present them to the Audit Committee or the Board at its next scheduled meeting) or may, if it deems it advisable, refer them to the Audit Committee or the Board for review. The RPT Subcommittee met 21 times in fiscal year 2017. The members of the RPT Subcommittee for fiscal year 2017 were Ms. Reese (chair), Mr. DePodesta and Mr. Kunkler.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee may also form and delegate authority to subcommittees when appropriate.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Communications with the Board of Directors

You may contact any non-employee director, or the entire Board, at any time, subject to the exceptions described below. Your communication should be sent to the Sears Holdings Corporation Board of Directors—c/o Corporate Secretary, Sears Holdings Corporation, Law Department, 3333 Beverly Road, Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60179. Communications are distributed to the Board, a committee of the Board, or any Board member

as appropriate, depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication. Certain items that are unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board will be excluded, such as new product suggestions, resumes and other job inquiries, surveys and business solicitations or advertisements.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board has no policy that mandates the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board believes that it is in the best interest of the Company to make such a determination at the time that it elects a new Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Lampert, our Chairman of the Board since 2004, was elected by the Board to the position of Chief Executive Officer in 2013, and has served in both capacities since his appointment as Chief

Executive Officer. The Board selected Mr. Lampert to ensure continuity of leadership, sharpen the Company’s strategy, continue the momentum of the transformation of the Company and accelerate the progress that the Company has made. The Company’s By-Laws provide that the independent directors may appoint a lead independent director to preside over each executive session of the independent directors.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Consistent with our leadership structure, our Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management are responsible for the identification, assessment and management of risks that could affect the Company, and the Board provides oversight in connection with these efforts. The Board’s oversight is conducted primarily through committees of the Board, as disclosed in the descriptions of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee above and in the charters of the Audit

Committee and the Compensation Committee. The full Board has retained responsibility for general oversight of risks. The Board satisfies this responsibility through full reports by each committee chair regarding the committee’s considerations and actions, as well as through regular reports directly from officers responsible for oversight of particular risks within the Company, including our Chief Financial Officer and our General Counsel.

AMOUNT AND NATURE OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP  

Security Ownership of 5% Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth information with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 14, 2018 by persons known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our outstanding common stock:

(subject to a 1.00% floor) or a specified prime rate (“Base Rate”), in either case plus an applicable margin. The margin with respect to the Second Lien Term Loan is 7.50% for LIBOR loans and 6.50% for Base Rate loans.

On July 7, 2017, the Company, the Second Lien Borrowers, certain other subsidiaries of the Company and the Second Lien Lenders entered into the first amendment to the Second Lien Credit Agreement. The amendment, among other things, modified the Second Lien Credit Agreement to provide an uncommitted line of credit facility pursuant to which, subject to applicable borrowing base limitations, the Second Lien Borrowers may from time to time borrow line of credit loans (“Line of Credit Loans”) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $500 million at any time outstanding from lenders that are or become party to the Second Lien Credit Agreement, as amended (the “Line of Credit Lenders”) on terms to be agreed. On February 7, 2018, the Second Lien Credit Agreement was further amended to, among other things, increase the maximum aggregate principal amount of the Line of Credit Loans to $600 million.

The Line of Credit Loans are secured on a pari passu basis with the Company’s existing obligations under the Second Lien Credit Agreement, including the Second Lien Term Loan, and its obligations under that certain Indenture, dated as of October 12, 2010, by and among the Company, the Company subsidiaries from time to time party thereto and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as successor collateral agent, pursuant to which the Company issued its Senior Secured Notes (defined below). The collateral includes inventory, receivables and other related assets of the Company and its subsidiaries which are obligated on the Line of Credit Loans, the Second Lien Term Loan and the Senior Secured Notes. The Company’s obligations under the Second Lien Credit Agreement, as amended, are guaranteed by all domestic subsidiaries of the Company that guarantee the Company’s obligations under its existing revolving credit facility.

On January 9, 2018, the Company, the Second Lien Borrowers, certain other subsidiaries of the Company and the Second Lien Lenders entered into a second amendment to the Second Lien Credit Agreement. The amendment amended the borrowing base definition in the Second Lien Credit Agreement to increase the advance rate for inventory to 75% from 65%. The amendment also deferred the collateral coverage test for purposes of the mandatory repayment covenant in the Second Lien Credit Agreement such that no such mandatory repayment can be required until the end of the third quarter of 2018.

At February 3, 2018, entities affiliated with ESL held $300 million of principal amount of the Second Lien Term Loan. At February 3, 2018, entities affiliated with ESL held $480 million of principal amount of the Line of Credit Loans and Mr. Tisch held $20 million of principal amount of the Line of Credit Loans.

Letter of Credit Facility Agreement

On December 28, 2016, the Company, through SRAC and Kmart (the “LC Borrowers”), entered into a Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement (the “LC Facility Agreement”) providing for a $500 million secured standby letter of credit facility (the “LC Facility”) from JPP, LLC and JPP II, LLC (collectively, the “LC Lenders”), with Citibank, N.A., serving as administrative agent and issuing bank (the “Issuing Bank”).

In August 2017, the parties to the LC Facility Agreement entered into an amendment to the LC Facility Agreement. The amendment, among other things, extended the maturity of the $271 million committed under the existing LC Facility from its original maturity date of December 28, 2017

through December 28, 2018 and eliminated the unused portion of the facility. The amendment also increased the pricing under the LC Facility and provided for the release of all real estate collateral that secured the existing facility.

The LC Facility was further amended in August 2017 to permit the LC Lenders to syndicate all or a portion of their commitments under the LC Facility to other lenders. At February 3, 2018, the entities affiliated with ESL had originally extended $271 million under the LC Facility, of which $138 million has been syndicated to unaffiliated third party lenders as of February 3, 2018.

The LC Facility is guaranteed by the same subsidiaries of the Company that guarantee the obligations under the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2015, among the LC Borrowers, Bank of America, N.A., as agent, and the lenders and other financial institutions party thereto, and is secured by substantially the same collateral as that credit agreement. To secure their obligation to participate in letters of credit issued under the LC Facility, the LC Lenders are required to maintain cash collateral on deposit with the Issuing Bank in an amount equal to 102% of the commitments under the LC Facility (the “Lender Deposit”).

The LC Borrowers were required to pay the LC Lenders an upfront fee equal to 1.00% of the aggregate amount of the Lender Deposit. In addition, the LC Borrowers are required to pay a commitment fee on the average daily amount of the Lender Deposit (as such amount may be increased or decreased from time to time), as well as certain other fees.

2017 Secured Loan Facility

On January 3, 2017, the Company, through Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart Stores of Illinois LLC, Kmart of Washington LLC and Kmart Corporation (collectively, the “2017 Secured Loan Borrowers”), entities wholly-owned and controlled, directly or indirectly by the Company, obtained a $500 million secured loan facility (the “2017 Secured Loan Facility”) from JPP, LLC and JPP II, LLC (collectively, the “2017 Secured Loan Lenders”). $321 million was funded under the 2017 Secured Loan Facility on January 3, 2017, and an additional $179 million was drawn by the Company prior to January 28, 2017.

During October 2017, the Company, through the 2017 Secured Loan Borrowers and SHC Desert Springs, LLC, Innovel Solutions, Inc., Sears Holdings Management Corporation, Maxserv, Inc., Troy Coolidge No. 13, LLC, Sears Development Co. and Big Beaver of Florida Development, LLC (collectively, “Incremental Loan Borrowers”), entities wholly-owned and controlled, directly or indirectly by the Company, entered into amended and restated loan agreements (the “Incremental Loans”) with the 2017 Secured Loan Lenders. The Company borrowed $200 million pursuant to the Incremental Loans, and used the proceeds for general corporate purposes.

The 2017 Secured Loan Facility has an annual base interest rate of 8%, with accrued interest payable monthly. The 2017 Secured Loan Borrowers paid an upfront commitment fee equal to 1.0% of the full principal amount of the 2017 Secured Loan Facility and paid a funding fee equal to 1.0% of the amounts drawn under the 2017 Secured Loan Facility at the time such amounts were drawn. The Incremental Loans have an annual interest rate of 11%, with accrued interest payable monthly. No upfront or funding fees were paid in connection with the Incremental Loans.

The 2017 Secured Loan Facility and Incremental Loans are guaranteed by the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, and were secured by a first priority lien on 69 real properties owned by the 2017 Secured Loan

Borrowers, Incremental Loan Borrowers and guarantors at inception of the 2017 Secured Loan Facility, and an additional 7 real properties owned by the Incremental Loan Borrowers at inception of the Incremental Loans. In certain circumstances, the Lenders and the 2017 Secured Loan Borrowers and Incremental Loan Borrowers may elect to substitute one or more properties as collateral.

The Incremental Loans mature on the later of (1) April 23, 2018 and (2) the earlier of (x) the date the loans under the 2016 Secured Loan Facility are repaid in full and (y) the maturity date of the loans under the 2016 Secured Loan Facility (including any extensions thereof in accordance with the 2016 Secured Loan Facility). All other loans under the Second Amended and Restated 2017 Secured Loan Facility continue to mature on July 20, 2020.

At February 3, 2018, the entities affiliated with ESL held $384 million of principal amount of the 2017 Secured Loan Facility and $145 million of principal amount of the Incremental Loans.

Term Loan Facility

On January 4, 2018, the Borrowers entered into a Term Loan Credit Agreement (the “Term Loan Credit Agreement”) providing for a secured term loan facility (the “Term Loan Facility”) from JPP, LLC and JPP II, LLC, as lenders (the “Term Loan Lenders”), with JPP, LLC, serving as administrative and collateral agent.

The Term Loan Facility is guaranteed by the Company and certain of its subsidiaries that guarantee the Company’s other material debt or own material intellectual property. The Term Loan Facility is secured by substantially all of the unencumbered intellectual property of the Company and its subsidiaries, other than intellectual property relating to the Kenmore and DieHard brands, as well as by certain real property interests, in each case subject to certain exclusions.

On January 4, 2018, $100 million was borrowed under the Term Loan Facility. The Term Loan Facility also contains an uncommitted incremental loan feature that, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the consent of the agent thereunder, would permit up to an additional $200 million to be borrowed under the Term Loan Facility and secured by the same collateral as the initial loan under the Term Loan Facility. An additional $30 million was borrowed under the Term Loan Facility on January 19, 2018.

On January 29, 2018, the Company entered into an amendment to the Term Loan Credit Agreement (the “Term Loan Credit Agreement Amendment”), pursuant to which an additional $20 million was borrowed from the Term Loan Lenders and a further $60 million was borrowed from certain unaffiliated lenders, bringing the total amount borrowed under the Term Loan Facility to $210 million at February 3, 2018. The Term Loan Credit Agreement Amendment, among other changes, separated the loans under the Term Loan Facility into two tranches.

The loans under the Term Loan Facility bear interest at a weighted average annual interest rate of LIBOR plus 12.5%, which during the first year must be paid in kind by capitalizing interest. The loans under the Term Loan Facility mature on July 20, 2020. No upfront or arrangement fees were paid in connection with the Term Loan Facility. The loans under the Term Loan Facility are prepayable without premium or penalty.

At February 3, 2018, the entities affiliated with ESL held $151 million of principal amount of the Term Loan Facility.

Senior Secured Notes

At both February 3, 2018 and January 28, 2017, Mr. Lampert and ESL held an aggregate of $20 million of principal amount of the Company’s 6 5/8% Senior Secured Notes due 2018. At February 3, 2018, entities affiliated with ESL held an aggregate of approximately $20 million of principal amount of the Company’s 6 5/8% Senior Secured Notes due 2018.

Senior Unsecured Notes and Warrants

At February 3, 2018, Mr. Lampert and ESL held an aggregate of approximately $188 million of principal amount of the Company’s 8% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2019 and warrants to purchase 11,137,153 shares of the Company’s common stock. At February 3, 2018, Fairholme held an aggregate of approximately $336 million of principal amount of the Company’s 8% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2019 and warrants to purchase 6,402,685 shares of the Company’s common stock. At February 3, 2018, Mr. Tisch held an aggregate of approximately $10 million of principal amount of the Company’s Senior Unsecured Notes and warrants to purchase 151,261 shares of the Company’s common stock.

Subsidiary Notes

At February 3, 2018, Fairholme held an aggregate of $9 million of principal amount of unsecured notes issued by SRAC.

Lands’ End

ESL owns approximately 67% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Lands’ End (based on publicly available information as of January 24, 2018). The Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a transition services agreement in connection with the spin-off pursuant to which Lands’ End and the Company provide to each other, on an interim, transitional basis, various services, which may include, but are not limited to, tax services, logistics services, auditing and compliance services, inventory management services, information technology services and continued participation in certain contracts shared with the Company and its subsidiaries, as well as agreements related to Lands’ End Shops at Sears and participation in the Shop Your Way ^® program.

Amounts due to or from Lands’ End are non-interest bearing, and generally settled on a net basis. Amounts related to revenue from retail services and rent for Lands’ End Shops at Sears, participation in the Shop Your Way program and corporate shared services were $60 million during fiscal year 2017. The amounts Lands’ End earned related to call center services and commissions were $2 million during fiscal year 2017. The Company also paid Lands’ End approximately $875,000 for uniforms and work-related clothing, $485,000 related to inventory for resale in one Kmart store, and $271,000 for Lands’ End merchandise purchased via Sears.com Marketplace sales in fiscal 2017.

Sears Hometown

On October 11, 2012, the Company completed the separation of our Sears Hometown and Outlet businesses through a rights offering (the “Sears Hometown separation”). ESL owns approximately 58% of the outstanding common stock of Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores, Inc. (“Sears Hometown”) (based on publicly available information as of November 8, 2017). The Company and certain of its subsidiaries engage in transactions with Sears Hometown pursuant to various agreements with

Sears Hometown which, among other things, (1) govern the principal transactions relating to the rights offering and certain aspects of our relationship with Sears Hometown following the Sears Hometown separation, (2) establish terms under which Sears Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries will provide Sears Hometown with services, and (3) establish terms pursuant to which Sears Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries will obtain merchandise for Sears Hometown.

These agreements were originally made in the context of a parent-subsidiary relationship and were negotiated in the overall context of the Sears Hometown separation. A summary of the nature of related party transactions involving Sears Hometown is as follows:

Sears Hometown obtains a significant amount of its merchandise from the Company. We have also entered into certain agreements with Sears Hometown to provide logistics, handling, warehouse and transportation services. Sears Hometown also pays a royalty related to the sale of Kenmore, Craftsman and DieHard products and fees for participation in the Shop Your Way program.

Sears Hometown receives amounts from the Company for the sale of merchandise made through www.sears.com, extended service agreements, delivery and handling services and credit revenues.

The Company provides Sears Hometown with shared corporate services. These services include accounting and finance, human resources, information technology and real estate.

Amounts due to or from Sears Hometown are non-interest bearing and generally settled on a net basis. The Company invoices Sears Hometown on a weekly basis. Amounts related to the sale of inventory and related services, royalties, and corporate shared services were $1 billion during fiscal year 2017. The net amounts Sears Hometown earned related to commissions were $66 million during fiscal year 2017. Additionally, the Company has guaranteed lease obligations for certain Sears Hometown store leases that were assigned as a result of the Sears Hometown separation.

Also in connection with the Sears Hometown separation, the Company entered into an agreement with Sears Hometown and the agent under Sears Hometown’s secured credit facility, whereby the Company committed to continue to provide services to Sears Hometown in connection with a realization on the lender’s collateral after default under the secured credit facility, notwithstanding Sears Hometown’s default under the underlying agreement with us, and to provide certain notices and services to the agent, for so long as any obligations remain outstanding under the secured credit facility.

During fiscal year 2017, the Company also paid Sears Hometown approximately $170,000 for purchases in Sears Hometown, Sears Outlet and Sears Hardware stores related to merchandise used for in-home service repairs (inventory for resale) and local purchases and approximately $110,000 for rent associated with a location subleased by the Company from Sears Hometown.

Seritage

On July 7, 2015, Sears Holdings completed its rights offering and sale-leaseback transaction (the “Seritage transaction”) with Seritage Growth Properties (“Seritage”), an independent publicly traded real estate investment trust. As part of the Seritage transaction, the Company sold 235 properties to Seritage (the “REIT properties”) along with the Company’s 50% interest in certain joint ventures. The Company received aggregate gross proceeds from the Seritage transaction of $2.7 billion

($2.6 billion, net of closing costs). The Seritage transaction was partially financed through the sale of common shares and limited partnership units, totaling $1.6 billion, including $745 million received from ESL and its affiliates and $297 million received from Fairholme and its affiliates. ESL owns approximately 7.2% of the total voting power of Seritage, and approximately 43.5% of the limited partnership units of Seritage Growth Properties, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), the entity that now owns the properties sold by the Company in the Seritage transaction and through which Seritage conducts its operations (based on publicly available information as of December 27, 2017). Mr. Lampert is also currently the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Seritage. Fairholme owns approximately 11% of the outstanding Class A common shares of Seritage and 100% of the outstanding Class C non-voting common shares of Seritage (based on publicly available information as of February 14, 2018).

In connection with the Seritage transaction, the Company entered into agreements with Seritage under which the Company initially leased 255 of the properties (the “Master Leases”), with the remaining properties being leased by Seritage to third parties. The Master Leases generally are triple net leases with respect to the space occupied by the Company, and the Company has the obligation to pay rent, costs and expenses of operation, repair, and maintenance of the space occupied. The Master Leases have an initial term of 10 years and provide the Company three options for five-year renewals of the term and a final option for a four-year renewal. Seritage has a recapture right with respect to approximately 50% of the space within the stores (subject to certain exceptions), in addition to all of the automotive care centers which are free-standing or attached as “appendages”, and all outparcels or outlots, as well as certain portions of parking areas and common areas, except as set forth in the Master Leases, for no additional consideration. Seritage has the additional right to recapture 100% of the space within the Company’s main store for certain specified location, effectively terminating the Master Leases with respect to such properties. The Master Leases also provide the Company certain rights to terminate the Master Leases with respect to properties that cease to be profitable for operation by the Company. In order to terminate the Master Lease with respect to a certain property, the Company must make a payment to Seritage of an amount equal to one year of rent (together with taxes and other expenses) with respect to such property. Such termination right, however, is limited so that it will not have the effect of reducing the fixed rent under the Master Lease for the REIT properties by more than 20% per annum. During fiscal 2017, Holdings received 100% recapture notices from Seritage with respect to 14 stores, 50% recapture notices with respect to an additional 11 stores and recapture notices with respect to 4 additional spaces. During fiscal year 2017, Holdings delivered lease termination notices to Seritage with respect to 39 stores.

Also, in connection with the Seritage transaction, the Company assigned its lease agreements with third party tenants for REIT properties to Seritage, and assigned rental income from Lands’ End for REIT properties to Seritage.

The initial amount of aggregate annual base rent under the Master Lease is $134 million, with increases of 2% per year beginning in the second lease year. In addition to base rent under the Master Lease, the Company pays monthly installment expenses for property taxes and insurance at all REIT properties where the Company is a tenant and installment expenses for common area maintenance, utilities and other operating expenses at REIT properties that are multi-tenant locations where Sears Holdings and other third parties are tenants. The initial amount of installment expenses under the Master Lease was initially $70 million, based on estimated installment expenses, and currently is $41 million as a result of recapture activity and reconciling actual installment expenses.

The Company paid Seritage $109 million rent, $43 million installment expenses, and $35 million lease termination fees during fiscal year 2017.

Sears Canada

ESL owns approximately 45% of the outstanding common shares of Sears Canada Inc. (“Sears Canada”) (based on publicly available information as of July 27, 2017).

For portions of fiscal year 2017, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries engaged in transactions with Sears Canada pursuant to the following agreements and arrangements: (1) a licensing agreement pursuant to which the Company gave Sears Canada a royalty-free license to use the name “Sears” as part of Sears Canada’s corporate name, as well as to use other brand names such as Kenmore and DieHard; (2) an information technology agreement pursuant to which the Company and Sears Canada shared information technology and software development,

ownership and costs; (3) an import services agreement pursuant to which a subsidiary of the Company performed certain import services at Sears Canada’s request, including coordination of merchandise shipments and inspections of imported merchandise; and (4) the performance by the Company of other services for Sears Canada outside the scope of the foregoing agreements on market terms and conditions. In fiscal year 2017, Sears Canada paid the Company or its subsidiaries an aggregate of approximately $948,000 under the foregoing arrangements.

Other

Our Chief People Officer, Julie Ainsworth, owns approximately 29% of the equity interests of celectiv LLC, a recruiting platform (“celectiv”). During fiscal 2017, the Company paid celectiv $150,000 for recruiting services provided by celectiv to the Company pursuant to an agreement entered into prior to Ms. Ainsworth becoming our Chief People Officer.

REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS  

The Company’s Audit Committee charter requires that the Audit Committee review and approve all related party transactions required to be disclosed pursuant to SEC or NASDAQ rules. The Audit Committee has adopted a written Related Party Transactions Policy that governs the Audit Committee’s practices with respect to related party transactions. In doing so, the Audit Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms that are no less favorable to the Company or its subsidiaries than would be obtained in a comparable arm’s-length transaction and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction.

In addition, as described above, the Audit Committee has established the RPT Subcommittee to assist the Audit Committee by reviewing potential related party transactions; any material amendments to, or modifications, terminations or extensions of, agreements involving related party transactions; and the Company’s guidelines and policies with regard to related party transactions generally. See, “Election of Directors—Committees of the Board of Directors—Audit Committee.”

Annual Compensation

Long-Term Compensation

When making individual compensation decisions for our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee takes many factors into account, including: the individual’s performance and experience; the performance of the Company overall; retention risk; the responsibilities, impact and importance of the position within the Company; the individual’s expected future contributions to the Company; and the individual’s historical compensation. There is not a pre-established policy or target for the allocation between annual and long-term incentive compensation. Instead, the Compensation Committee takes a holistic approach to executive compensation and balances the compensation elements for each named executive officer individually.

How Elements Are Used to Achieve Our Compensation Objectives

In fiscal year 2017, the Compensation Committee sought to achieve the objectives of our compensation program through the grant of annual or long-term incentive awards, or both, to our named executive officers. The 2017 annual incentive awards offer participating named executive officers an opportunity for cash compensation (or, in the case of Mr. Lampert, cash or equity compensation) based upon Sears Holdings Corporation (“SHC”) EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) or a combination of SHC EBITDA and business unit operating profit (“BOP”), in each case for the fiscal year.

The Compensation Committee granted long-term performance-based awards to certain of our named executive officers that become payable in cash following a three-year performance cycle upon achievement of SHC EBITDA during the three-year performance period, provided that the participating named executive officer is actively employed on the vesting date. The Compensation Committee also granted long-term time-based awards to certain of our named executive officers that become payable in cash following the three-year service period, provided that the participating named executive officer is actively employed on the vesting date. The 2017 long-term incentive awards are designed to retain and motivate our participating named executive officers to focus on long-term financial performance of the Company.

The Compensation Committee believes that the most fair and effective way to motivate the Company’s named executive officers to produce the best results for its stockholders is to increase the proportion of an executive officer’s total compensation that is performance-based or otherwise “at risk,” as the executive’s ability to affect those results increases. Additionally, the Compensation Committee believes that the value of incentive compensation should depend upon the performance of the Company and/or its business units in a given performance period or over the applicable vesting period.

Except for Mr. Lampert, the annual incentive plan (“AIP”) targets for the Company’s participating named executive officers in fiscal year 2017 were calculated based on a multiple of base salary, which ranged from .75 to 1.5. Mr. Lampert’s AIP target in fiscal year 2017 was $2,000,000. Target AIP opportunities for the participating named executive officers are generally established when the Compensation Committee approves a new annual incentive plan or at the time the Compensation Committee otherwise approves a compensation package for a newly hired or promoted participating named executive officer. Target AIP opportunities are based upon the participating named executive officer’s relative level of responsibility and potential to affect the Company’s overall performance. The performance-based long-term awards and time-based long-term awards granted to the Company’s participating named executive officers under the long-term incentive programs in fiscal year 2017 also were calculated based on a multiple of base salary, which ranged from .75 to 1.03. The target AIP opportunities are determined based on a combination of several factors including internal equity/job level, prior compensation levels, market rates and individual negotiations with candidates.

The Compensation Committee determines whether the applicable financial performance targets have been attained under our applicable annual and long-term performance-based incentive programs. The Compensation Committee has not exercised its discretion to adjust performance targets or payout amounts for any of our participating named executive officers. In 2017, the Compensation Committee also considered the requirements of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”). The impact of Section 162(m) on compensation awarded to our named executive officers in 2017 is described in “Certain Tax Consequences” on page 27 of this proxy statement.

Fiscal Year 2017 Compensation Decisions

During fiscal year 2017, the Compensation Committee worked with senior management of the Company in determining named executive officers’ total compensation. Management presented recommendations to the

Compensation Committee regarding a named executive officer’s total compensation for review and final approval.

2017 Base Salaries

Base salaries are set to reflect: a named executive officer’s performance and experience; the individual’s expected future contributions to the Company; the responsibilities, impact and importance of the position within the Company; internal pay equity; and competitive pay research. The timing and amount of base salary increases depend on the named executive officer’s past performance, promotion or other change in responsibilities, expected future contributions to the Company and current market competitiveness; provided, however, that Mr. Lampert’s annual base salary does not reflect the foregoing factors.

Mr. Lampert received a salary of $1.00 for fiscal year 2017. The base salaries of Messrs. Hollar, Lakshman and Zoll remained unchanged for

fiscal year 2017 from fiscal year 2016. In connection with her promotion to Chief Digital Officer effective January 1, 2018, Ms. Munjal’s base salary was increased to $700,000 retroactive to May 1, 2017. Mr. Naedele joined the Company in March 2017, and his 2017 base salary was $550,000. In connection with his promotion to Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Riecker’s base salary was increased to $650,000 effective April 21, 2017. In connection with his promotion to President, Tools, Lawn & Garden, Fitness, Sporting Goods and Children’s Entertainment, Mr. Schwartz’s base salary was increased to $400,000 effective January 29, 2017, and in connection with his promotion to President, Hardlines, Mr. Schwartz’s base salary was increased to $425,000 effective April 25, 2017.

2017 Annual Incentive Plan Opportunity

The AIP is a cash-based (or, in the case of Mr. Lampert, cash or equity-based) program that is intended to reward participants, including our named executive officers, for their contributions to the achievement of certain SHC EBITDA, BOP or other financial goals or a combination of these goals. The Compensation Committee approved 2017 performance measures under the AIP (together with the AIP plan document, the “2017

AIP”). Any payouts under the 2017 AIP generally were designed to range up to 200% of the target incentive award, at maximum level of performance. The following table sets forth the primary financial performance goals for each of our named executive officers under the 2017 AIP.

For fiscal year 2017, the Target AIP opportunity and financial performance measures for the named executive officers were as follows:

SHC EBITDA under the 2017 AIP is defined as earnings of the Company before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for the performance period computed as operating income (loss) on the statement of operations of the Company for the applicable reporting period, adjusted for depreciation and amortization and gains/(losses) on sales of assets. In addition, it is adjusted to exclude:

The SHC EBITDA incentive target contemplates that the Company remains approximately the same size over the performance period. If after the beginning of the performance period, the Company divests itself of assets or an entity equal or greater in value than $100,000,000, the SHC EBITDA target amount for the performance period will be decreased by the actual SHC EBITDA of such assets or entity for the portion of the last full fiscal year prior to the divestiture corresponding to the portion of the performance period (in which the divestiture occurs) remaining after the divestiture occurs.

We continue to use SHC EBITDA as a performance goal because it is a key metric used by management to measure business performance. We also believe that it accurately reflects our compensation philosophy of encouraging growth and creating increased stockholder value through the efficient use of corporate assets.

BOP for each business unit of the Company that is covered by the 2017 AIP is defined as SHC EBITDA, as adjusted as described above if related to the business unit, as reported in the Company’s internal operating statements. We believe that BOP performance goals support our financial goals by reinforcing responsibility and accountability at the business unit level.

In establishing financial business goals for the fiscal year to be approved by the Compensation Committee, factors such as our prior fiscal year financial business results, our competitive situation, our evaluation of market trends, as well as the general state of the economy and our business were all considered. For fiscal year 2017, threshold, target and maximum performance goals were established for SHC EBITDA and BOP components as follows:

Messrs. Riecker, Naedele and Schwartz earned an annual incentive payment under the 2017 AIP that was less than the minimum annual bonus guaranteed in their respective offer letter. Ms. Munjal earned an annual incentive payment

under the 2017 AIP of $12,331, which was attributable to the Overall Operating BU BOP portion of her award. None of the other named executive officers will receive a payout under the 2017 AIP.

Long-Term Incentive Opportunities

Long-term compensation opportunities for fiscal year 2017 consisted of performance-based awards under the Sears Holdings Corporation Long-Term Incentive Program (“LTIP”) and time-based awards under the Sears Holdings Corporation Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Cash LTI”). In fiscal year 2017, the Compensation Committee approved 2017 performance goals, measures, definitions and other particulars under the LTIP (together with the LTIP plan document, the “2017 LTIP”) and 2017 particulars under the Cash LTI (together with the Cash LTI plan document, the “2017 Cash LTI”).

In making compensation decisions, no formal weighting formula is used in determining individual award amounts under our long-term incentive programs. Instead, the Compensation Committee considers the participating named executive officer’s relative level of responsibility and potential to affect the Company’s overall performance when it awards long-term compensation. The Compensation Committee believes that at the time the performance goals for each LTIP were set, achievement of those levels of performance would require a high level of performance that would be difficult to attain.

SHC LTIP EBITDA is defined substantially the same for LTIP purposes as SHC EBITDA with respect to the 2017 AIP (as defined above). However, the specific financial goal under each plan year is specific to each plan period.

In addition to the 2017 long-term compensation program, for the continuing named executive officers (other than Messrs. Lampert and Naedele), long-term compensation opportunities also consist of awards under: the 2016 Long-Term Incentive Program (the “2016 LTIP”), a cash program dependent upon the achievement of Company financial goals during fiscal years 2016 through 2018 that was designed to be performance-based; the 2016 Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan, a cash program that was designed to be time-based (the “2016 Cash LTI”); the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Program (the “2015 LTIP”), a cash program dependent upon the achievement of Company financial goals during fiscal years 2015 through 2017 that was designed to be performance-based; and the 2015 Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan, a cash program that was designed to be time-based (the “2015 Cash LTI”).

Under the LTIP, in the event of a participant’s termination of employment as a result of death or disability before the payment date for his or her award, a payment will be made with respect to that participant in an amount equal to his or her pro-rated target cash incentive opportunity, but only if (1) the applicable performance measure(s) for the period of the performance period through the month preceding the participant’s termination of employment is equal to or greater than the performance goals for such measure(s), pro-rated through the date of termination, (2) the applicable performance measure(s) is equal to or greater than the performance goals for the applicable performance measure(s) for the performance period and (3) the participant has been employed by us for at least 12 months of the performance period. In the event of voluntary termination or termination with cause (as defined in the relevant plan document) before the payment date for his or her award, the participant will forfeit all of his or her LTIP award. Except as noted above, to be eligible to receive payment of an award, a participant must be actively employed as of the payment date following completion of the performance period.

In the event of a participant’s death or disability before the payment date for his or her award under the 2017 Cash LTI, 2016 Cash LTI or 2015 Cash LTI, a payment will be made with respect to that participant in an amount equal to his or her pro-rated cash incentive opportunity, but only if the

participant has been employed by us for at least 12 months of the service period. In the event of voluntary termination or involuntary termination (for any reason other than death or disability) before the vesting date for his or her award, the participant will forfeit all of his or her Cash LTI award.

The 2017 LTIP, 2017 Cash LTI, 2016 LTIP, 2016 Cash LTI, 2015 LTIP, and 2015 Cash LTI are described in further detail below.

2015 Long-Term Incentive Structure: 2015 LTIP and 2015 Cash LTI

For 2015, the LTIP was intended as a performance and time-based incentive program. The named executive officers who participate in the 2015 LTIP and the 2015 Cash LTI are Messrs. Riecker and Schwartz and Ms. Munjal. Upon Mr. Hollar’s departure from the Company in April 2017, Mr. Hollar forfeited his 2015 LTIP and 2015 Cash LTI award.

The 2015 long-term incentive opportunity for Messrs. Riecker and Schwartz and Ms. Munjal is equal to 50% of base salary, of which 75% is under the 2015 LTIP and 25% is under the 2015 Cash LTI.

2015 LTIP

Opportunities for participants under the 2015 LTIP portion of the 2015 long-term incentive opportunity are based on either 100% SHC LTIP EBITDA or a combination of 25% SHC LTIP EBITDA and 75% BOP-based measures.

The Compensation Committee determined the level of financial performance for each performance measure, the performance measure or measures to apply to each business, and which performance measure or measures applies to each participating named executive officer. Threshold, target and maximum goals have been established for all performance measures under the 2015 LTIP.

The 2015 LTIP portion of the 2015 long-term incentive opportunity for Mr. Riecker and Ms. Munjal is based 100% on SHC LTIP EBITDA. The 2015 LTIP portion of the 2015 long-term incentive opportunity for Mr. Schwartz is based 25% on SHC LTIP EBITDA and 75% on Lawn & Garden BOP performance and Tools BOP performance.

2015 Cash LTI

The second component of the 2015 long-term incentive structure is the 2015 Cash LTI.

The 2015 Cash LTI provides the opportunity for participants to receive a long-term incentive payout, provided that the participant is actively employed by the Company on the vesting date, which is the first April 1 following the end of the service period. The service period refers to the applicable fiscal years under which the 2015 Cash LTI award was granted. Awards under the 2015 Cash LTI represent the right to receive cash as soon as administratively feasible after the vesting date but in no case later than the date that is the 15th day of the third month following the vesting date. The service period for the 2015 Cash LTI is the beginning of the Company’s 2015 fiscal year through the end of its 2017 fiscal year. In 2015, Messrs. Riecker and Schwartz and Ms. Munjal received awards of

$46,875, $40,000 and $59,375, respectively, under the 2015 Cash LTI. Payment of such amounts is contingent upon their remaining actively employed by the Company through April 1, 2018.

2016 Long-Term Incentive Structure: 2016 LTIP and 2016 Cash LTI

For 2016, the LTIP was intended as a performance and time-based incentive program. The named executive officers who participate in the 2016 LTIP and the 2016 Cash LTI are Messrs. Riecker and Schwartz and Ms. Munjal. Upon Mr. Hollar’s departure from the Company in April 2017 and Mr. Zoll’s departure from the Company in June 2017, each forfeited his respective 2016 LTIP and 2016 Cash LTI award.

The 2016 long-term incentive opportunity for Ms. Munjal is equal to 75% of base salary and for each of Messrs. Riecker and Schwartz is 50% of base salary. In each case, 75% of the opportunity is under the 2016 LTIP and 25% is under the 2016 Cash LTI.

2016 LTIP

The 2016 LTIP for the participating named executive officers is based solely on SHC LTIP EBITDA. The Compensation Committee determined the level of financial performance for such performance measure, as well as threshold, target and maximum goals for such performance measure.

2016 Cash LTI

The second component of the 2016 long-term incentive structure is the 2016 Cash LTI.

The 2016 Cash LTI provides the opportunity for participants to receive a long-term incentive payout, provided that the participant is actively employed by the Company on the vesting date, which is the April 1st following the end of the service period. The service period refers to the applicable fiscal years under which the 2016 Cash LTI award was granted. Awards under the 2016 Cash LTI represent the right to receive cash as soon as administratively feasible after the vesting date but in no case later than the date that is the 15th day of the third month following the vesting date. The service period for the 2016 Cash LTI is the beginning of the

Company’s 2016 fiscal year through the end of its 2018 fiscal year. In 2016, Messrs. Riecker and Schwartz and Ms. Munjal received awards of $53,125, $40,000 and $112,500, respectively, under the 2016 Cash LTI. Payment of such amounts is contingent upon their remaining actively employed by the Company through April 1, 2019.

2017 Long-Term Incentive Structure: 2017 LTIP and 2017 Cash LTI

For 2017, the LTIP was intended as a performance and time-based incentive program. The continuing named executive officers who participate in the 2017 LTIP and the 2017 Cash LTI are Messrs. Riecker, Schwartz and Naedele and Ms. Munjal. Upon Mr. Hollar’s departure from the Company in April 2017 and Mr. Zoll’s departure from the Company in June 2017, each forfeited his respective 2017 LTIP and 2017 Cash LTI award.

The 2017 long-term incentive opportunity for Mr. Schwartz and Ms. Munjal is equal to 75% of base salary, of which 75% is under the 2017 LTIP and 25% is under the 2017 Cash LTI. The 2017 long-term incentive opportunity for Mr. Riecker is equal to 100% of base salary, of which 75% is under the 2017 LTIP and 25% is under the 2017 Cash LTI. The 2017 long-term incentive opportunity for Mr. Naedele is equal to 100% of base salary, subject to proration based on his start date with the Company, of which 75% is under the 2017 LTIP and 25% is under the 2017 Cash LTI. The 2017 long-term incentive opportunities were determined based on a combination of several factors including internal equity/job level, prior compensation levels and market rates.

2017 LTIP

The 2017 LTIP provides the opportunity for salaried employees who generally hold a position of vice president or higher to receive a long-term incentive award equal to a percentage of his or her base salary or a dollar amount subject to the attainment of performance goals for a three-year period (fiscal years 2017 through 2019). Awards under the 2017 LTIP represent the right to receive cash or, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, shares of our common stock in lieu of cash, or a combination of cash and shares, upon the achievement of certain performance goals.

The following table summarizes the long-term financial measures that apply to the performance-based portion of the 2017 LTIP for the participating named executive officers:

The financial performance weighting is based 100% on SHC EBITDA for each participating named executive officer. Under the 2017 LTIP, the

threshold level of performance for the LTIP EBITDA measure is 70% of the cumulative target three-year LTIP EBITDA during the performance period.

A threshold level of performance will generate a payout at 25% of the 2017 LTIP target opportunity and a target level of performance will generate a payout at 100% of the 2017 LTIP target opportunity. The maximum incentive opportunity under the 2017 LTIP is 200% of the participant’s target award amount.

If performance goals are achieved, the Company will pay awards earned under the 2017 LTIP to participants no later than April 15, 2020, provided that the participant is actively employed by the Company on the payment date (unless otherwise prohibited by law).

2017 Cash LTI

The second component of the 2017 long-term incentive structure is the 2017 Cash LTI.

The 2017 Cash LTI provides the opportunity for participants to receive a long-term incentive payout, provided that the participant is actively employed by the Company on the vesting date, which is the April 1st following the end of the service period. The service period refers to the applicable fiscal years under which the 2017 Cash LTI award was granted. Awards under the 2017 Cash LTI represent the right to receive cash as soon as administratively feasible after the vesting date but in no case later than the date that is the 15th day of the third month following the vesting date. The service period for the 2017 Cash LTI is the beginning of the Company’s 2017 fiscal year through the end of its 2019 fiscal year. In 2017, Messrs. Riecker, Schwartz and Naedele and Ms. Munjal received awards of $162,500, $75,000, $132,990 and $112,500, respectively, under the 2017 Cash LTI. Payment of such amounts is contingent upon their remaining actively employed by the Company through April 1, 2020.

Other Compensation Elements

Discretionary Bonuses and Incentives

We have paid, and may in the future pay, sign-on, guarantees and other bonuses where determined necessary or appropriate to attract top executive talent from other companies and motivate or retain key executives or both. Executives we recruit often have unrealized value in the form of unvested equity and other forgone compensation opportunities. Sign-on bonuses are an effective means of offsetting compensation opportunities executives may forfeit when they leave a former company to join Sears Holdings. The below discusses the additional compensation elements of certain of our continuing named executive officers.

Mr. Naedele’s offer letter provides for a one-time sign-on bonus of $180,000, subject to repayment in full if certain termination events occur within twenty-four (24) months of Mr. Naedele’s start date with the Company. Additionally, Mr. Naedele’s offer letter provides for an additional long-term cash award of $450,000, payable in three installments. Mr. Naedele will receive $100,000 within thirty (30) days of the first anniversary of his start date and $175,000 within thirty (30) days of each of his second and third anniversaries of his start date, provided he is actively employed on the applicable vesting date, and each installment is subject to repayment if terminated by the Company for misconduct or integrity issues within twelve months of the applicable payment date. Furthermore, Mr. Naedele is eligible to receive a special incentive award based on performance metrics determined by the Company for each of fiscal year 2017 ($300,000 prorated from his start date through February 3, 2018), 2018 ($400,000) and 2019 ($500,000), provided he is actively employed on the applicable payment date. For 2017, the performance metric was expansion, activation and profitability of the Shop Your Way partner ecosystem and related businesses. Target performance levels were achieved in part for the 2017 special incentive award; accordingly, Mr. Naedele received $193,694. Mr. Naedele received these compensation awards to induce him to join the Company, to compensate him for other foregone compensation opportunities and in recognition of his expected future contributions to the Company.

In connection with Mr. Schwartz’s promotion to President, Hardlines, Mr. Schwartz was granted a special performance bonus with a target payment opportunity of $200,000. Payment under the special performance bonus was based on the cumulative BOP for certain business units and was payable, if earned, after February 3, 2018. Threshold performance levels were not achieved; accordingly, there will be no payout under the special performance bonus.

Perquisites and Other Benefits

The Company may provide its named executive officers with perquisites and other personal benefits that the Compensation Committee deems reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program. None of its named executive officers received any perquisites or other personal benefits during fiscal year 2017 other than Mr. Naedele, who received certain commuter and relocation payments and tax gross-ups.

Retirement Plans

We provide 401(k) savings plans to allow participants to contribute towards retirement on a pre-tax (including catch-up contributions) and after-tax basis. The U.S. 401(k) savings plan allows pre-tax contributions of up to 50% of eligible compensation (or the limit determined by the Internal Revenue Service) and after-tax contributions of up to 25% of eligible compensation, provided however that in the aggregate these contributions do not exceed 50% of eligible compensation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective January 31, 2009, additional contribution restrictions were imposed on plan participants who were highly compensated employees as defined by the Internal Revenue Code. Each named executive officer was subject to these additional contribution restrictions. In addition, the Company has previously suspended its matching contributions to the 401(k) savings plans.

We also maintain a frozen, qualified pension plan, the Sears Holdings Pension Plan 1 (the “Pension Plan”), that provides retirement income to certain legacy Sears, Roebuck and Co. participants. The Company eliminated future benefit accruals for the Pension Plan as of December 31, 2005. No named executive officer, other than Mr. Schwartz, participates in the Pension Plan.

Severance Benefits

Each of our named executive officers other than Mr. Lampert has entered into an executive severance agreement (an “ESA”) with the Company. The ESAs contain non-disclosure, non-solicitation and non-competition restrictions. Additionally, the payments under the ESAs provide individuals a window of time to locate a new position in the marketplace. While the following description of the terms and conditions applies generally to our ESAs with our named executive officers, ESAs with certain of our executive officers may contain different or additional terms and conditions that

served as additional inducements for those named executive officers to join the Company and, if applicable, are more fully described under “Payments Pursuant to ESAs” starting on page 32 . Under the relevant ESA, payments are provided for involuntary termination by the Company without cause (as defined in the ESA) or termination by the named executive officer for “good reason” (as defined in the ESA). Named executive officers, except Mr. Lampert and, if applicable, except as described under the heading “Payments Pursuant to ESAs,” will receive payments equal to one year of annual base salary, subject to mitigation for salary or wages earned from another employer, including self-employment depending on the form of agreement.

If a named executive officer becomes entitled to benefits under the relevant ESA, the named executive officer will be entitled to other Company benefits such as continued participation in Sears Holdings medical and dental plans during the salary continuation period, among other benefits. The forms of ESAs do not have specific change-in-control or similar provisions that would give rise to or impact the payments and benefits to the executive officers.

Fiscal Year 2017 CEO Compensation

On January 28, 2016, the Company and Mr. Lampert agreed to a three year extension of Mr. Lampert’s offer letter dated March 18, 2013. Pursuant to Mr. Lampert’s compensation arrangement, Mr. Lampert is paid an annual base salary of $1, effective as of February 1, 2013, the date on which Mr. Lampert began to serve as our Chief Executive Officer. In addition, during each of the first six years of Mr. Lampert’s service as our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Lampert (1) participated in the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan, with a target incentive opportunity of $2,000,000 (based in fiscal year 2017 solely on the achievement of the SHC EBITDA goal), payout under which (if any) may be paid, at Mr. Lampert’s election, in cash or in common stock of the Company, and (2) received stock with a value of $4,500,000 per annum, payable in monthly installments subject to his continued service as Chief Executive Officer. For fiscal 2017, the number of shares issued to Mr. Lampert pursuant to his annual equity award through February 3, 2018 totaled 606,469. This total was calculated by dividing $4,500,000 by the value of the Company’s common

stock on January 27, 2017 of $7.42 per share, payable in monthly installments and subject to his continued service as Chief Executive Officer. The number of shares to be issued to Mr. Lampert from February 3, 2018 through February 2, 2019 was calculated by dividing $4,500,000 by the value of the Company’s common stock on February 2, 2018 of $2.35, payable in monthly installments and subject to his continued service as Chief Executive Officer. To the extent there is not a sufficient number of shares available under the Company’s equity plans to make any award contemplated under Mr. Lampert’s offer letter, Mr. Lampert will be entitled to receive compensation of substantially equivalent economic value in such form as the Company and Mr. Lampert mutually agree. Mr. Lampert is not eligible to participate in the Company’s long-term incentive programs. He also is not entitled to severance benefits if his employment with the Company is terminated for any reason, and he has not entered into an ESA with the Company.

Certain Tax Consequences

In setting an executive officer’s compensation package in 2017, the Compensation Committee considered the requirements of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m), which provided that compensation in excess of $1 million paid to certain executive officers was not deductible unless it was performance-based and paid under a program that meets certain other legal requirements. Neither base salary nor time-based cash or equity awards that vest based solely on continued service qualified as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). Although a significant portion of each executive officer’s 2017 compensation was intended to satisfy the requirements for deductibility under Section 162(m),

the Compensation Committee retained the ability to evaluate the performance of our executives and to pay appropriate compensation, even if it had resulted in the non-deductibility of certain compensation under federal tax law.

Following the passage in December 2017 of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the qualified performance-based compensation exception to Section 162(m)’s limit on deductibility has been eliminated, except with regard to certain grandfathered awards.

Compensation Committee Role in Executive Compensation Decisions

The Compensation Committee is appointed by the Board to fulfill the Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of our senior officers. The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for approving and evaluating all compensation plans, policies and programs as they affect the Chief Executive Officer and other senior officers. The Compensation Committee is composed of independent members of the Board and consists of no fewer than two members.

The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain or terminate any compensation consultant to be used to assist it in the evaluation of Chief Executive Officer or senior officer compensation and has the sole authority to approve the consultant’s fees and the terms and conditions of the consultant’s retention. The Compensation Committee also has authority to obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal, accounting or other advisors. No compensation consultant was used by the Compensation Committee in 2017.

The Compensation Committee duties include, but are not limited to:

The Compensation Committee also receives periodic reports on our compensation programs as they affect all associates.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning the total compensation paid to each person who served as our Chief Executive Officer or our Chief Financial Officer during fiscal year 2017, to our three other most highly compensated executive officers for fiscal year 2017 who were executive officers at the end of the fiscal year and to two additional individuals who served as executive officers during 2017 for whom disclosure would have been provided but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer at the end of the fiscal year (collectively, the “named executive officers”).

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The compensation plans under which the grants in the following table were made are generally described under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 20 of this proxy statement.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year End

The following table shows the number of shares of unvested restricted stock held by the Company’s named executive officers on February 3, 2018. None of the Company’s named executive officers held stock options on February 3, 2018.

Pension Benefits

As discussed under “Retirement Plans” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis on page 20 of this proxy statement, the Company maintains the Sears Holdings Pension Plan 1 (the “Pension Plan”), which provides retirement income to certain legacy Sears, Roebuck and Co. participants. As also discussed above, future benefit accruals for the Pension Plan have been eliminated. The Pension Plan does not provide for above-market earnings on deferred compensation amounts.

based upon credited years of service and the average annual cash compensation of the associate’s highest five successive calendar years of earnings out of the ten years immediately preceding termination of employment (“final average annual compensation”). Benefits earned through December 31, 1988 are reduced by a portion of the participant’s estimated social security benefits.

The table below shows information with respect to the Pension Plan. The years of credited service under the Pension Plan are as of January 31, 2018, rounded to the nearest whole number. The present value of accumulated benefit uses mortality and interest rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Company’s financial statements. See footnote (b) for assumptions used for the present value of accumulated benefit calculation. The only named executive officer eligible for pension benefits is Mr. Schwartz.

Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment

The amount of compensation paid to each of the named executive officers of the Company in the event of termination of such executive’s employment is discussed below, and potential payouts are detailed in the tables beginning on page 32 . The amounts shown assume that such termination was effective as of February 3, 2018, the last business day of fiscal year 2017. Therefore, the tables include amounts earned through

such time and are estimates of the amounts which would have been paid to each named executive officer upon his or her termination, subject to mitigation (as applicable). The actual amounts that would have been paid to the executives can be determined only at the time of such executive’s separation from the Company.

Payments Pursuant to ESAs

As described under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 20, the Company provides payments and benefits to our named executive officers pursuant to ESAs that the Company entered into with each of such executive officers, other than Mr. Lampert, who is not entitled to such payments and benefits and with whom there is no ESA. The amounts shown in the table for termination for “good reason” or termination without “cause” are based on the following agreement provisions, for those named executive officers with ESAs, other than Mr. Hollar who separated from the Company in April 2017, Mr. Lakshman who separated from the Company in May 2017, and Mr. Zoll who separated from the Company in June 2017, as further discussed below.

Payments and Benefits Upon Termination for “Good Reason” or Without “Cause”

For Mr. Naedele, an additional $550,000 would be deemed included in his base salary if his date of termination is prior to April 15, 2018.

Other Payments and Benefits

The forms of ESAs do not provide for payments to the participating named executive officers upon termination of employment due to death, disability or retirement. If a termination had been effective as of February 3, 2018 due to death or disability, the participating named executive officers would have been eligible to receive payments under the Company’s annual and long-term incentive programs, as provided below.

An eligible named executive officer will not be entitled to payment under the ESAs in the event of termination for “cause” or voluntary termination.

Under the ESAs, the named executive officers agree to non-disclosure of confidential information, non-solicitation and non-compete covenants, as well as a release of liability for certain claims against the Company.

Separation of Executive Officers

Effective April 29, 2017, Mr. Hollar ceased serving as our chief financial officer. In connection with Mr. Hollar’s separation from the Company, Mr. Hollar forfeited his 2017 annual incentive and LTIP awards. Mr. Hollar did not receive any additional compensation in connection with his departure from the Company.

Effective May 16, 2017, Mr. Lakshman ceased serving as an executive officer of the Company. In accordance with the terms of his pre-existing ESA, Mr. Lakshman forfeited his 2017 annual incentive award, but received the sum of his annual base salary of $800,000, payable in the form of salary continuation for 12 months, and will remain eligible to enroll in the Company’s benefit plans for 12 months.

Effective June 15, 2017, Mr. Zoll ceased serving as an executive officer of the Company. In accordance with the terms of his pre-existing ESA, Mr. Zoll will receive (i) the sum of his annual base salary of $725,000, (ii) an amount equivalent to his 2017 target bonus of $725,000, payable in the form of salary continuation for 12 months and (iii) an amount equal to his unpaid stay bonus under the terms of his offer letter of $500,000, and he will remain eligible to enroll in the Company’s benefit plans for 12 months.

Payments Pursuant to Incentive Compensation Programs

2017 Annual Incentive Plan

If a continuing named executive officer with an ESA voluntarily terminates employment (for any reason other than disability) or is involuntarily terminated for any reason (other than death), he or she will forfeit his or her 2017 AIP award, except as prohibited by law.

If a named executive officer with an ESA has a termination of employment with the Company because of death or disability, the named executive officer will be entitled to a prorated payment through the termination date if the financial criteria under the 2017 AIP are satisfied. The proration would be based upon a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full days worked on active payroll during fiscal year 2017 and the denominator of which is the number of full days in fiscal year 2017. Messrs. Riecker and Schwartz and Ms. Munjal would have received $14,348, $22,712 and $12,331, respectively, under the 2017 AIP in the event of death or disability because their financial goals pertaining to their respective AIP assignments were achieved in part. Mr. Naedele would not have been entitled to a distribution under the 2017 AIP in the event of death or disability because the financial goals pertaining to his AIP assignment was not achieved.

2015 Long-Term Incentive Program; 2016 Long-Term Incentive Program; 2017 Long-Term Incentive Program

Any awards under the 2015 LTIP, 2016 LTIP and 2017 LTIP are subject to forfeiture by a named executive officer with an ESA in the event of voluntary termination of employment (for any reason other than disability) or involuntary termination for any reason (other than death), except as prohibited by law. If such a named executive officer’s employment is terminated because of death or disability, the named executive officer will be entitled to a pro-rated payment through the termination date if the financial goals under the 2015 LTIP, 2016 LTIP or 2017 LTIP, as of the

termination date, equal or exceed the applicable performance goals and the named executive officer was a participant in the applicable LTIP for at least 12 months of the performance period. Any proration would be based on a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full months during the performance period in which the executive was a participant, and the denominator of which is the number of full months in the applicable performance period.

As of February 3, 2018, the financial performances under the 2015 LTIP, 2016 LTIP and 2017 LTIP were not equal to or in excess of the applicable performance goals, and therefore, no named executive officer participating in the 2015 LTIP, 2016 LTIP or 2017 LTIP would have been entitled to any payments under these plans in the event of death or disability on such date.

2015 Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan; 2016 Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan; 2017 Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan

If a named executive officer with an ESA voluntarily terminates employment (for any reason other than disability) or is involuntarily terminated for any reason (other than death) prior to the applicable vesting date, he or she will forfeit his or her 2015 Cash LTI award, 2016 Cash LTI award and 2017 Cash LTI award, if any, in each case except as prohibited by law. If such named executive officer’s employment is terminated because of death or disability, the named executive officer will be entitled to a pro-rated payment through the termination date if the named executive officer was employed by the Company or one of its subsidiaries for at least 12 months of the three year service period. As of February 3, 2018, Messrs. Riecker and Schwartz and Ms. Munjal would have been employed for at least 12 months of the 2015, 2016 and 2017 Cash LTI Plans’ respective service periods, and therefore would be entitled to payments under this program in the event of death or disability.

Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment

The table below summarizes the potential payouts to our named executive officers, other than for Messrs. Hollar, Lakshman and Zoll, for the specified termination events assuming such termination occurred on February 3, 2018. Mr. Hollar separated from the Company in April 2017 and is receiving no additional compensation. Mr. Lakshman separated from the Company in May 2017 and Mr. Zoll separated from the Company in June 2017, and each is receiving payments and benefits pursuant to his respective ESA, as further discussed above.